20020991 Ver 1_Year 5 Monitoring Report_20140117

ks
CVC V\�
Kings Creek
Stream Restoration
NCEEP Project Number: 208
Contract Number: D09082S
Monitoring Year 5
2013 Final Report
Submitted to
North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
November 2013
Ecosystem
I'R(7li h/�M
1619 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699
RECEMD JAN 0 8 209
DG @C0w[� pp
JAN 17 2014
D NR - WA ALITY

0

Monitoring Firm
EQUINOX
ENVIRONMENTAL
CONSULTATION & DESIGN
37 Haywood Street, Suite 100
Asheville, North Carolina 28801
Phone: 828 - 253 -6856
Project Contact: Hunter Terrell
Email: Hunter @equinoxenvironmental.com

Kings Creek Stream Restoration
2013 Monitoring Report (MY 5)
Table of Contents
10 Executive Summary / Project Abstract Page 1
20 Methodology Page 3
30 References Page 4

Appendix A Pr
Figure 1
Table la
Table lb
Table 2
Table 3
Table 4
Appendices
:)ject Vicinity Map and Background Tables
Vicinity Map and Directions
Project Components
Component Summations
Project Activity and Reporting History
Project Contacts
Project Attributes
Appendix B Visual Assessment Data
Figure 2 Integrated Current Condition Plan View
Table 5 Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment
Table 6 Vegetation Condition Assessment
Appendix C Vegetation Plot Data
Table 7 Vegetation Plot Criteria Attainment
Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos
Table 8 CVS Vegetation Plot Metadata
Table 9 Planted and Total Stem Counts (Species by Plot with Annual Means)
Appendix D Stream Survey Data
Cross - Sections with Annual Overlays
Longitudinal Profiles with Annual Overlays
Pebble Count Plots with Annual Overlays
Table 10a Baseline Stream Data Summary
Table l Ob Baseline Stream Data Summary (Substrate, Bed, Bank, and Hydrologic
Containment Parameter Distributions)
Table 11 a Monitoring Data — Dimensional Morphology Summary (Dimensional
Parameters — Cross - Sections)
Table l lb Monitoring Data — Stream Reach Data Summary
Appendix E Hydrologic Data
Table 12 Verification of Bankfull Events

1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY / PROJECT ABSTRACT
The goals and objectives stated to the Kings Creek Mitigation Report (NCEEP 2006) are as
follows
• Restore 2,119 linear feet of channel dimension, pattern, and profile to the extent possible,
• Improve floodplam functionality by matching floodplam elevation with bankfull stage,
thereby increasing watershed attenuation and reducing peak flows,
• Establish native floodplain vegetation, which will allow treatment of diffuse storm flow
and nutrient uptake while establishing part of a wildlife corridor in the watershed,
• Remove invasive exotic vegetation species from the stream corridor,
• Improve the natural aesthetics of the stream corridor, and
• Improve the water quality in the Kings Creek watershed by reducing bank erosion,
increasing nutrient storage and uptake, and increasing dissolved oxygen of the system
The monitoring year five (MY5) vegetation plot data indicate that the project is meeting the final
established criterion for planted stem density, which is a minimum survival of 260 planted stems
per acre at the end of the year five monitoring period Average stem density for planted stems in
MY5 is approximately 648 stems per acre Additionally, when planted and natural stems are
combined, the average stem density is 2,536 stems per acre, which is well above the minimum
established criterion Of the 48 planted stems recorded within the monitoring plots, 94% had
vigor codes of good or excellent The site includes a diverse assemblage of 18 planted and
volunteers species of native trees and shrubs Planted species range from 5 to 6 per plot with 10
to 13 species observed when volunteers are included Past problems with vegetation consist of
areas of low stem densities adjacent to the stream reach as well as approximately 16 currently
isolated patches of high threat invasive plant species that span the project area A supplemental
live stake planting occurred on March 16, 2011 in those areas noted with low stem densities and
eroding banks A total of four treatments of invasive plant populations occurred on February 61h,
April 24`h, June 24`h, and September 30`h of 2013 Treatments targeted Bittersweet, Kudzu,
Multiflora Rose, Privet, Japanese Honeysuckle, Japanese Spirea, and Bamboo A walk- through
was performed to evaluate efficacy of prior treatments during the September 30`h treatment,
some resiliency was observed on privet and rose, but other species were affected greatly by
initial treatments Additionally, follow up treatments will be completed during 2014 growing
season, prior to project closeout
Stream longitudinal profiles have remained relatively stable among monitoring years The
primary stream issue observed during MY5 was bank erosion resulting from thalweg migration
and low woody stem densities In particular, thalweg migration has continued at station 2 +00
(83 feet) and 5 +25 (38 feet) causing further bank erosion These two areas of concern have
continued to actively erode between monitoring years Including these two areas, 16% of the
project area is currently actively eroding All other morphological metrics indicated
performance percentages averaging between 88 and 100% Two bankfull events, one event on
January 31" and one event on July 3rd, were documented during MY5 The former was
documented using wrack lines as well as the crest gauge High rainfall in the area and anecdotal
evidence of overbank flows confirmed the second bankfull event
Kings Creek Final 1 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc
Project No 208 November 2013
Monitoring Year 5 of 5

Summary information/data related to the occurrence of items such as beaver or easement
encroachment and statistics related to performance of various project and monitoring elements
can be found in the tables and figures in the report appendices Narrative background and
supporting information formerly found in these reports can be found in the mitigation and
restoration plan documents available on EEP's website All raw data supporting tables and
figures in the appendices is available from EEP upon request
Kings Creek Final 2 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc
Project No 208 November 2013
Monitoring Year 5 of 5

2.0 Methodology
The stream monitoring methodologies utilized to 2013 replicate those employed during previous
monitoring years and are based on standard guidance and procedures documents (Rosgen 1996
and USACE 2003) Vegetation monitoring data were collected following the standard CVS -EEP
Protocol for Recording Vegetation, Level 11 (Lee et al 2008)
Kings Creek Final 3 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc
Project No 208 November 2013
Monitoring Year 5 of 5

3.0 References
Lee, M T, R K Peet, S D Roberts, and T R Wentworth 2008 CVS -EEP Protocol for
Recording Vegetation Version 4 2 The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill,
Department of Biology
NCEEP (North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program) 2006 Mitigation Report
Kings Creek Restoration Project Raleigh
Rosgen, D L 1996 Applied River Morphology Wildland Hydrology Books, Pagosa
Springs, Colorado
USACE (U S Army Corps of Engineers) 2003 Stream Mitigation Guidelines USACOE,
USEPA, NCWRC, NCDENR -DWQ Wilmington District
Kings Creek Final 4 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc
Project No 208 November 2013
Monitoring Year 5 of 5

Appendix A
Project Vicinity Map and Background Tables

Appendix A
Project Vicinity Map and Background Tables
*The anhupated mitigation units are based on the expected yields due to the lack of a full 30 -foot riparian buffer on portions of the stream
- Information unavailable
Table lib. Component SUMTHRUo s
gable 1a. Project
Components
Kin s Cre,1ek / Pro'ect o. 208
Restoration
Stream
Non -RipaT(Ac)
s Creek /
ect No. 208
Riparian Wetland (Ac)
Protect
on
c
°—
v
u
on
: u
ou
Ac
g
a
o.
Non- Rivenne
Component
v
w
`o d
a
y
Stationing
�o
_n 'e
Comment
or Reach ID
w
Enhancement
Q
U ii
oG
Q
j
a
Enhancement II
191
Reach 1
824
R
P2
990
840
1+00- 10+90
1 1
840
N/A
Excavated new off -Ime bankfull channel and
HQ Preservation
constructed flood lam at lower elevation
Reach 11
191
El
191
0
10 +90 - 12 +81
25 1
0
N/A
Excavated floodplain on left bank and stabilized
00 BMP
Count
*Anticipated
Jett bank slopes No work on right bank
Reach 111
800
R
P2
936
791
12 +81 - 22 +17
1 1
791
N/A
Excavated new off -line bankfull channel and
constructed flood lam at lower elevation
*The anhupated mitigation units are based on the expected yields due to the lack of a full 30 -foot riparian buffer on portions of the stream
- Information unavailable
= Non - Applicable
*The anticipated mitigation units are based on the expected yields due to the lack of a full 30 -foot riparian buffer on
portions of the stream
Kings Creek Final A -2 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc
Project No 208 November 2013
Monitoring Year 5 of 5
Table lib. Component SUMTHRUo s
Kin s Cre,1ek / Pro'ect o. 208
Restoration
Stream
Non -RipaT(Ac)
and Buffer
Riparian Wetland (Ac)
TBMP
Level
1
Ac
Ac
Rrvenne
Non- Rivenne
Restoration
1,928
Enhancement
Enhancement I
Enhancement II
191
Creation
Preservation
HQ Preservation
0
0
Totals
2,119
0.0
0.0
00
00 BMP
Count
*Anticipated
1,631
0.0
0.0
00
0.0 0
SMU Totals
= Non - Applicable
*The anticipated mitigation units are based on the expected yields due to the lack of a full 30 -foot riparian buffer on
portions of the stream
Kings Creek Final A -2 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc
Project No 208 November 2013
Monitoring Year 5 of 5

Appendix A
Project Vicinity Map and Background Tables
Tab a 2. Proj ct ctivity and porting • � tory
D ed Sinc Gr'rading ete• e
apsedTime Since 1211 'ng Co IMUMMIN ete: 7 ,ears
Number of a rlti ears • 5
Activity or Deliverable
Data Collection
Complete
Completion or
Delivery
Restoration Plan
-
-
Final Design - Construction Plans
-
Sep-04
Construction
N/A
2006
Live Stakes and Bare Root Trees Planted
N/A
2006
Mitigation Plan / As -bush Year 0 Momtorm - Basehne
Nov- 05/Dec -05
May-06
Year 1 Monitormg
2008
2008
Year 2 Monrtorm
Nov -10
Nov -10
Supplemental Live Stake Plantmg Effort
Mar -11
Mar -11
Year 3 Monrtorm
Nov -11
Nov -11
Beaver and Beaver Dam Removal
Oct -12
Oct -12
Year 4 Monrtorm
Nov -12
1 Dec -12
Year 5 Monitorm
Nov -13
I Nov -13
- Information unavailable
N/A - Item does not apply
Kings Creek Final A -3 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc
Project No 208 November 2013
Monitoring Year 5 of 5

Appendix A
Project Vicinity Map and Background Tables
able 3. ;j p ect Contacts
Kin s Creel;ro ect N_o_. 2_0_8
Designer
Buck Engineering / Michael Baker Corp
797 Haywood Road, Suite 201
Asheville, North Carolina 28806
Primary Project Design POC
Andrew Bick (828) 350 -1408
Construction Contractor
l -J, inc
220 Stoneridge Drive, Suite 405
Columbia, SC 29210
Construction Contractor POC
Richard Goodwin (803 ) 929-1181
Survey Contractor
Joel Johnson land Surveying
Survey Contractor POC
Joel Johnson (828) 586 -6488
Planting Contractor
Unknown
Planting Contractor POC
Unknown
Seeding Contractor
Unknown
Planting Contractor POC
Unknown
Seed M ix Sources
Unknown
Nursery Stock Suppliers
Unknown
Momtonng Performers (YO) - 2006
Buck Engineering/ Michael Baker Corp
797 Haywood Road, Suite 201
Asheville, North Carolina 28806
Stream Monitoring POC
Unknown
Vegetation Monitoring POC
Unknown
Momtonng Performers (Yl) - 2008
North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission
171 Southern Cross Road
Weaverville, North Carolina 28787
Stream Monitoring POC
Jeff Ferguson (828)231 -3517
Vegetation M onitoring POC
JeffFer son (828) 231 -3517
Monitoring Performers (Y2) - 2010
Equinox Environmental Consultation & Design, inc
37 Haywood Street, Suite 100
Asheville, North Carolina 28801
Stream Monitoring POC
Steve Melton (828) 253 -6856
Vegetation Monitoring POC
Sarah Marcmko (828 ) 253 -6856
Monitoring Performers (Y3) - 2011
Equinox Environmental Consultation & Design, Inc
37 Haywood Street Suite 100
Asheville, North Carolina 28801
Stream M omtonn POC
Win Taylor (828) 253 -6856
Vegetation Monitoring POC
Kevin Mitchell (828) 253 -6856
Monitonng Performers (Y4) - 2012
Equinox Environmental Consultation & Design, inc
37 Haywood Street, Suite 100
Asheville, North Carolina 28801
Stream Monitoring POC
Kevin Mitchell (828) 253 -6856
Vegetation M onitoring POC
Kevin Mitchell (828) 253 -6856
Momtonng Performers (Y5) - 2013
Equinox Environmental Consultation & Design, Inc
37 Haywood Street, Suite 100
Asheville, North Carolina 28801
Stream Monitoring POC
Hunter Terrell (828 ) 253 -6856
Vegetation M onitoring POC lHunter
Terrel](828) 253 -6856 EEEE�
Unknown - information was unknown at time of report submittal
Kings Creek Final A -4 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc
Project No 208 November 2013
Monitoring Year 5 of 5

Appendix A
Project Vicinity Map and Background Tables
Table 4. Projec W" b
Project County
Transylvania
Physiographic Region
Blue Ridge
Ecoregion
Broad Basms
Project River Basm
French Broad
USGS HUC for Project 14 di
06010105010050
NCDW Sub -Basin for Project
04 -03 -01
Withm Extent of EEP Watershed Plan
No
WRC Class Warm, Cool, Cold
Cool
% of Project Easement Fenced or Demarcated
1000/0
Beaver Activity Observed Durmg Design Phase
Unknown
Restoration Component Attributes
Kings Creek
Drama e Area (sq rr
4 2
Stream Order
Second
Restored Length feet
2,119
Perennial or Intermittent
Perennial
Watershed Type
Urban
Watershed LULC Distribution
-
Watershed Impervious Cover
-
NCDW AU / Index Number
6 -30
NCDWQ Classification
C / Tr
303d Listed
No
Upstream of 303d Listed Segment
No
Reasons for 303d Listmg or Stressor
N/A
Total Acreage of Easement
6 11
Total Vegetated Acreage within Easement
566
Total Planted Acreage as Part of Restoration
556
Ros en Classification of Pre- Existm
-
Ros en Classification of As -Built
C4
VaUey Type
-
VaHey Slope
-
VaHey Side Sloe Range
-
VaHey Toe Sloe Range
-
Cowardm Classification
N/A
Trout Waters Designation
Yes
Species of Concern, Endangered, Etc
-
Dorrmant Soil Series and Characteristics
Series
Depth
-
Cla /o
-
K
T.
-
- Information unavailable
N/A - Item does not apply
Kings Creek Final A -5 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc
Project No 208 November 2013
Monitoring Year 5 of 5

Appendix B
Visual Assessment Data

i' Hui i c. ill LU9I iiiUu ' U i 1U 111 L.I /IIU 1l1V11 1 lull v IU VV L1 ill
Prepared for Project: Kings Creek Notes: 1) Base Map Data Provided by NCEEP Prepared by
Year 5 Monitoring 2) 2010 Aerial Photo
�,..
Transylvania County, North Carolina
Sheet 1 of 1 EQUINOX
Ecosystem Date ENVIROY M o:: Y14M Project Number
PROGRAM November 2013 NCEEP # 208

Appendix B
Visual Assessment Data
Table 5. Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment
Kings Creek / Project No. 208
Assessed LenErth 2,119 feet
Number
Footage
Adfusted %
Number
Total
Number of
Amount of
% Stable,
with
wrth
for
Major Channel
Channel
Stable,
Category
Sub- Category
Metric
PerforPerforming
Number in
Unstable
Unstable
Performing
Stabilizing
Stabilizing
Stabilizing
As -built
Segments
Footage
as Intended
Woody
Woody
Woody
as ]mended
Vegetation
Vegetation
Vegetation
1 Bed
I Aggradation Bar formation /growth sufficient to significantly deflect
1 Vertical Stabihh
flow lateral) (not to include omt bars)
1
74
96%
2 Dewadation Evidence of downcuttmg
0
0
100%
(Riffle and Run Units)
2 Riffle Condition
I Texture /Substrate - Riffle maintains coarser substrate
13
13
100%
I Depth Sufficient (Max Pool Depth Mean Bankfull Depth 7 1 6)
12
12
100%
3 Meander Pool
Condition
2 Lemith appropriate(> 30 %ofcenterlmedistancebctweenfail of
upstream riffle and head of downstream nRle
1)
12
100%
I Thalweg centering at upstream of meander bend (Run)
7
12
58%
4 Thalweg Position
91%
2 Thalwegcentermg at downstream of meander bend (Glide)
10
11
2 Bank
1 Scoured /Eroding
Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from poor growth and/or
11
611
86%
II
284
92%
scour and erosion
Banks undercut /overhangmgto the extent that mass wasting appears likely
2 Undercut
Does NOT mclude undercuts that are modest appear sustainable and are
1
18
100%
1
18
100%
providing habitat
3 Mass Wasting
Bank slump mgcahmgorcollapse
2
49
99%
0
49
100%
Totals
14
678
84%
12
1 351
92%
3 Engineered
I Overall Integrity
Structures physically intact with no dislodged boulders or logs
14
16
88%
Structures
2 Grade Control
Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the sill
21
24
88%
2a Piping
Structures lacking any substantial flow underneath sills or aims
24
24
100%
3 Bank Protection
Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence does NOT exceed
29
30
97%
15%
Pool foamingstructuresmaintaining -Max Pool Depth McanBankfull
4 Habitat
Depth Ratio x 1 6 Rootwads/logs providing some cover at base -flow
12
12
1
Kings Creek Final
Project No 208
Monitoring Year 5 of 5
B -2 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc
November 2013

Appendix B
Visual Assessment Data
i
Table 6. Vegetation Condition Assessment
� gs C re e !OJ 1ct P No. 208
Acrea a 5_S_6
Number of
Combined
% of
Vegetation Category
Definitions
CCPV Depiction
Polygons
Acreage
Planted
Acreage
1 Bare Areas
Very limited cover of both woody and herbaceous material
N/A
0
000
0%
2 Low Stem Density Areas
Woody stem densities clearly below target levels based on M Y3,
Stipple
7
005
1%
4, or 5 stem count criteria
Black Dots White Background
Tptals
7
005
1%
3 Areas of Poor Growth Rates or Vigor
Areas with woody stems of a size class that are obviously small
N/A
0
000
0%
given the momtonn year
Cumalative Totals
7
005
1 %
Easement Acre age 6.11
% of
Vegetation Category
Definitions
CCPV Depiction
Number of
Combined
Easement
Polygons
Acreage
Acreage
4 Invasive Areas of Concern
Areas or points (if too small to render as polygons at map scale)
Cross Hatch _
0
000 4
0% m
(Red - Dense/Yellow - Present
5 Easement Encroachment Areas
Areas or points (if too small to render as polygons at map scale)
N/A
0
000
0%
Kings Creek Final
Project No 208
Monitoring Year 5 of 5
B -3 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc
November 2013

Appendix C
Vegetation Plot Data

Appendix C
Kings Creek Final
Project No 208
Monitoring Year 5 of 5
Vegetation Plot Data
Table MY Vegetation Plot Criteria Attainmen
s Creek / P,ro'ect No 208
Vegetation
Vegetation Plot
Survival
Tract Mean
ID
Threshold Met?
I
Yes
100%
2
Yes
3
Yes
C -1 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc
November 2013

Appendix C
Vegetation Plot Data
Vegetation Monitoring Plot 1
Monitoring Year 5 — June 3, 2013
Kings Creek Final
Project No. 208
Monitoring Year 5 of 5
Vegetation Monitoring Plot 2
Monitoring Year 5 — June 3, 2013
C -2 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
November 2013

Appendix C
Vegetation Plot Data
Kings Creek Final
Project No. 208
Monitoring Year 5 of 5
Vegetation Monitoring Plot 3
Monitoring Year 5 — June 3, 2013
C -3 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
November 2013

Appendix C
Vegetation Plot Data
Ta61e 8. C1fS Vegetation Plot Metadata
Tangs Creek /Project No. 208
Report Prepared By
Owen Carson
Date Prepared
7/15/2013 10 49
Database Name
E wnox- 2013 -A -Km sCreek -MY5 mdb
Database Location
Z \ES \NRI &M \EEP Monitorin \Kin s Creek \KC -MY5- 2013 \Data \Ve
Computer Name
SENIORSCIEMIST
File Size
148234496
DESCRIP.jTiIONTO -ORK HS TS IN THIS DOCUMENIT
Metadata
Description of database file, the report worksheets, and a summary of
project(s) and project data
Proj, Planted
Each project is listed with its PLANTED stems per acre, for each year
This excludes live stakes
Proj, Total Stems
Each project is listed with its TOTAL stems per acre, for each year This
includes live stakes, all planted stems, and all natural /volunteer stems
Plots
List of plots surveyed with location and summary data (live stems, dead
stems, missing, etc
Vigor
Frequency distribution of v or classes for stems for all plots
Vigor b Spp
Frequency distribution of v or classes listed by species
Damage
List of most frequent damage classes with number of occurrences and
percent of total stems impacted by each
Damage by Spp
Dama a values tallied by type for each species
Damage by Plot
Damage values tallied by type for each plot
Planted Stems by Plot and Spp
A matrix of the count of PLANTED living stems of each species for each
lot, dead and missing stems are excluded
ALL Stems by Plot and spp
A matrix of the count of total living stems of each species (planted and
natural volunteers combined) for each plot, dead and missing stems are
excluded
PR EIN QUMM
Project Code
208
project Name
Kings Creek
Description
On the campus of Brevard College
River Basin
French Broad
Length(ft)
Stream -to -Ede Width ft
Area sq m
Required Plots calculated
Sam led Plots
13
Kings Creek Final
Project No 208
Monitoring Year 5 of 5
C -4 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc
November 2013

Appendix C
Vegetation Assessment Data
'Fable 9. Planted and 7btal Stem Counts (Species by Plot with Annual Means)
Kings Creek / Project No. 208
Current Plot Data (MY5 2013)
Annual Means
Scientific Name
Common Name
Species Type
E208 -01 -0001
E208 -01 -0002
E208 -01 -0003
MY5(2013)
MY4(2012)
MY3(2011)
MY2(2010)
PnoLS
P -all
T
PnoLS
P -all
T
PnoLS
P -all
T
PnoLS
P -all
T
PnoLS
P -all
IT
PnoLS
P -all
IT
PnoLS
P -all
IT
Acer
maple
Tree
3
Acer rubrum
red maple
Tree
48
113
Acer rubrum var. rubrum
red maple
Tree
16
10
49
75
113
Acersaccharinum
silver maple
Tree
2
2
Alnusserrulata
hazel alder
Shrub
6
6
6
1
1
1
1
1
4
8
8
11
8
8
16
8
8
13
10
10
1
Aronia arbutifolia
Red Chokeberry
Shrub
1
2
2
3
2
2
4
21
2
2
2
2
3
2
2
2
Betula nigra
river birch
Tree
2
2
2
3
3
3
3
3
3
81
8
8
8
8
8
7
7
7
8
8
Cornus amomum
silky dogwood
Shrub
3
3
9
8
3
3
3
20
3
3
21
3
3
8
3
3
5
Corylus americana
American hazelnut
Shrub
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
green ash
Tree
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Hamamelis virginiana var
American witchhazel
Tree
4
4
4
2
2
2
1
1
1
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
5
5
5
Juglans nigra
black walnut
Tree
2
2
2
Liquidambarstyraciflua
sweetgum
Tree
1
1
7
1
2
Liriodendron tulipifera
tuliptree
Tree
13
Liriodendron tulipifera vz
Tulip -tree, Yellow Pc
Tree
2
1
6
9
6
12
Nyssa sylvatica
blackgum
Tree
2
2
3
2
2
3
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
Pinus strobus
eastern white pine
Tree
1
1
2
1
Platanus occidentalis var.
Sycamore, Plane-trei
Tree
6
6
it
3
3
3
7
7
9
16
16
23
12
12
28
16
16
27
15
15
39
Prunus serotina
black cherry
Tree
2
Prunus serotina var, serol
black cherry
Tree
2
2
1
Quercus phellos
1willow oak
Tree
1
Salix nigra Iblackwillow
Tree
3
3
4
3
Sambucuscanadensis lCommon
Elderberry
Shrub
12
2
14
1
2
1
1
1
1
size (ares1
size (ACRES0.02
Stem counr93O.8
Species coun
StemsperACR930.8
23
61
10
10
4
15
15
85
48
48
188
44
45
151
47
48
2
47
48
2
1
1
3
3
3
3
0.02
0.02
0.07
0.07
0.07
0.07
6
1
5
5
1
6
6'
12
9
9
1
9
10
1
9
10
15
9
10
1
246
404.71404
7
1700
607
607
3440
647.5
647.5
2536
593.5
607
203J
634
647.51
2752
634
647.5
281
Exceeds requirements by 10%
Kings Creek Final C-5 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
Project No. 208 November 2013
Monitoring Year 5 of 5

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data

Appendix D
2115
2114
2113
2112
2111
2110
:. 2109
u
� 2108
0
cya 2107
W 2106
2105
2104
2103
2102
2101
2100
11+{10 0 +10 0 +20 0 +30 0 +40 0 +50 0+60 0 +70 0 +80 0 +90
Station (feet)
�- MYO 5/2006 MY2 6/22/2010 MY3 2/17/2011 MY4 2/8/2012 —•--- MY5 3/27/2013
Stream Survey Data
Kings Creek/ Project No. 208
Cross - Section 1 - Riffle
Station 6 +84
1 +00
Kings Creek Final D- I Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
Project No. 208 November 2013
Monitoring Year 5 of 5

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
Cross - Section 1 — Riffle
Left Bank Descending
Monitoring Year 5 — March 27, 2013
Cross - Section 1 — Riffle
Right Bank Descending
Monitoring Year 5 — March 27, 2013
Kings Creek Final D -2 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
Project No. 208 November 2013
Monitoring Year 5 of 5

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
Cross - Section 1 — Riffle
Downstream
Monitoring Year 5 — March 27, 2013
Cross- Section 1 — Riffle
Upstream
Monitoring Year 5 — March 27, 2013
Kings Creek Final D -3 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
Project No. 208 November 2013
Monitoring Year 5 of 5

Appendix D
2115
2114
2113
2112
2111
2110
2109
w
1.108
0
a 2107
W 2106
2105
2104
2103
2102
2101
2100
0
Stream Survey Data
Kings Creek / Project No. 208
Cross - Section 2 - Pool
Station 7 +85
+00 0 +10 0 +20 0 +30 0 +40 0 +50 0+60 0 +70 0 +80 0+90 1+00 1 +10 1 +20 1 +30
Station (feet)
• MYO 5/2006 MY2 6/22/2010 MY3 2/17/2011 MY4 2/8/2012 ' MY5 3/27/2013 — — — * Bkf
Kings Creek Final D -4 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
Project No. 208 November 2013
Monitoring Year 5 of 5

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
Cross - Section 2 — Pool
Left Bank Descending
Monitoring Year 5 — March 27, 2013
Cross - Section 2 — Pool
Right Bank Descending
Monitoring Year 5 — March 27, 2013
Kings Creek Final D -5 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
Project No. 208 November 2013
Monitoring Year 5 of 5

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
Cross - Section 2 — Pool
Downstream
Monitoring Year 5 — March 27, 2013
Cross - Section 2 — Pool
Upstream
Monitoring Year 5 — March 27, 2013
Kings Creek Final D -6 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
Project No. 208 November 2013
Monitoring Year 5 of 5

Appendix D
2110
2109
2108
2107
2106
a 2105
w
C
0 2104
W 2103
2102
2101
2100
2099
2098
0+00 0 +10 0 +20 0 +30 0 +40 0+50 0 +60 0 +70 0+80
Station (feet)
MYO 5/2006 MY2 6/24/2010 Ml'3 2/18/2011 MY4 2/8/2012 ` MY5 3/28/2013 - -- Bkf
Stream Survey Data
Kings Creek / Project No. 208
Cross - Section 3 - Riffle
Station 15 +13
0 +90
Kings Creek Final 0-7 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
Project No. 208 November 2013
Monitoring Year 5 of 5

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
Cross - Section 3 — Riffle
Left Bank Descending
Monitoring Year 5 — March 28, 2013
Cross - Section 3 — Riffle
Right Bank Descending
Monitoring Year 5 — March 28, 2013
Kings Creek Final D -8 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
Project No. 208 November 2013
Monitoring Year 5 of 5

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
Cross - Section 3 — Riffle
Downstream
Monitoring Year 5 — March 28, 2013
Cross - Section 3 — Riffle
Upstream
Monitoring Year 5 — March 28, 2013
Kings Creek Final D -9 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
Project No. 208 November 2013
Monitoring Year 5 of 5

Appendix D
2110
2109
2108
2107
2106
a 2105
w
c
2104
W 2103
2102
2101
2100
2099
2098
0+00
Stream Survey Data
Kings Creek/ Project No. 208
Cross - Section 4 - Pool
Station 16 +17
0 +10 0 +20 0 +30 0 +40 0 +50 0 +60 0 +70 0 +80 0 +90
Station (feet)
• Y1Y0 5/2006 MY2 6/24/2010 MY3 2/18/2011 MY4 2/8/2012 iN9Y5 3/28/2013 — — — Bkf
Kings Creek Final D -10 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
Project No. 208 November 2013
Monitoring Year 5 of 5

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
Cross - Section 4 — Pool
Left Bank Descending
Monitoring Year 5 — March 28, 2013
Kings Creek Final
Project No. 208
Monitoring Year 5 of 5
Cross - Section 4 — Pool
Right Bank Descending
Monitoring Year 5 — March 28, 2013
D -11 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
November 2013

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
Cross- Section 4 — Pool
Downstream
Monitoring Year 5 — March 28, 2013
Cross - Section 4 — Pool
Upstream
Monitoring Year 5 — March 28, 2013
Kings Creek Final D -12 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
Project No. 208 November 2013
Monitoring Year 5 of 5

Appendix D
2120
2118
2116
2114
2112
2110
2108
w 2106
c
0
2104
w
2102
2100
2098
2096
2094
2092
2090
0
Stream Survey Data
Kings Creek
Longitudinal Profile
Stationing 1 +14 - 22 +28
8 9 to !j l2 I�
'bo 'bo �o �o
Station (feet)
"I'halweg MYO ___r — Thalweg NIY'I Thal"g MY2 Thalweg MY'3 1halweg NIY4 Thalweg NIN 5 • Bkf YY'S o Structures
Kings Creek Final D -13 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
Project No. 208 November 2013
Monitoring Year 5 of 5

Appendix D
ds
Stream Survey Data
5 C @l3
Monrtormg Year 5
Description
Material
Size (mm)
Total #
Item %
Cum %
Silt /Clay
sdt/clay
0 062
0%
0%
Sand
very fine sand
0 125
0%
0%
fine sand
025
0%
0%
median sand
050
6
6%
6%
coarse sand
100
6
6%
12%
very coarse sand
200
4
4%
16%
Gravel
very fine gravel
40
00/0
16%
fine gravel
57
2
2%
18%
fine gravel
80
1
1%
19%
medium gravel
113
1
1%
20%
medium gravel
160
5
5%
25%
coarse gravel
223
11
11%
36%
coarse gravel
32
13
13%
49%
very coarse gravel
45
22
22%
70%
very coarse gravel
64
15
15%
85%
Cobble
small cobble
90
9
9%
94%
medium cobble
128
6
6%
1000/0
large cobble
180
0%
100%
very large cobble
256
0%
1000/.
Boulder
small boulder
362
0%
1000/0
small boulder
512
0%
1000/0
medium boulder
1024
0%
1000/0
large boulder
2048
0%
1000/0
very large boulder
4096
0%
1000/0
Bedrock
bedrock
>4096
0%
1000/0
TOTALS
1
101
100%
100%
IN
a
D50 33
D84 62
D95 95
Kings Creek Final
Project No 208
Monitoring Year 5 of 5
r
D -14 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc
November 2013

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
Kings Creek
Pebble Count - Percent Cumulative
Cross Section 1 - Riffle
a •
• • • •
F —+
100
90%
—
80%
—
e
ro
r
70% F
--
u
e
--
60% i
e
u
50
--
d
a
—
40% >
30% E
0
20%
—
�—
10%
O C N
M N O
O O
0%
ry
C1
Particle Size (mm)
MY2 6/16/2010 MY3 211712011
MY4 6/26/2012 MY5 3/28/2013
Kings Creek
Pebble Count - Percent Individual
Cross Section 1 - Riffle
25%
20%
15% ;v
e
c
v
10% �
u
a
5%
0%
t N Q
7 O
M Vo
V
O O
'm
O O
^O
N
V 9
V
m
Particle Size (mm)
o MY2 6/16/2010 13 MY3 1/17/2011
13 MY4 6/26/2012 ■ MY5 3/28/2013
Kings Creek Final
Project No. 208
Monitoring Year 5 of 5
D -15 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
November 2013

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
I C
e
Momtormg Year 5
Description
Material
Size (mm)
Total #
Item %
Cum %
Silt /Clay
sdUclay
0 062
0%
0%
Sand
very fine sand
0 125
2
2%
2%
fine sand
025
9
9%
11%
medium sand
050
5
5%
16%
coarse sand
100
10
10%
26%
very coarse sand
200
5
5%
31%
very fine gravel
40
0%
31%
fore gravel
57
4
4%
35%
Gravel
fine gravel
80
3
3%
38%
medium gravel
113
6
6%
44%
medium gravel
160
7
7%
50%
coarse gravel
223
11
11%
61%
coarse gravel
32
12
12%
73%
very coarse gravel
45
9
9%
82%
very coarse gravel
64
7
7%
89%
Cobble
small cobble
90
11
11%
100%
medium cobble
128
0%
100%
large cobble
180
0%
100%
very large cobble
256
0%
1000/0
Boulder
small boulder
362
01/1.
100%
small boulder
512
0%
100° /a
medium boulder
1024
0%
100%
large boulder
2048
0%
1000/0
very large boulder
4096
0%
1000/0
Bedrock
bedrock
>4096
0%
100%
FTOTALS1
1
101
1 100%
100%
a
D50 16
D84 49
D95 77
Kings Creek Final D -16 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc
Project No 208 November 2013
Monitoring Year 5 of 5

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
Kings Creek
Pebble Count - Percent Cumulative
Cross Section 2 - Pool
100%
90
80
¢,
t
F'
70%
r
60% L%
e
5
i
40% i
30
U
20%
10%
`
0%
d
CC
Particle Size (mm)
MY2 6/16/2010 MY3 2/17/2011
MY4 7/12/2012 MY5 3/28/2013
Kings Creek
Pebble Count - Percent Individual
Cross Section 2 - Pool
25%
20
is
0
:2
15%
9
O
d
to %
96
5%
0%
V1
�O
N 7 OD
N R
0O Y
T V
d
m
Particle Size (mm)
®MY2 6116/2010 13MY3 2/17/2011
�MY4 7/12/2012 OMY5 3/28/2013
Kings Creek Final
Project No. 208
Monitoring Year 5 of 5
D -17 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
November 2013

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
Kings Creek Final D -18 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc
Project No 208 November 2013
Monitoring Year 5 of 5
'
D50
Monitormg Year 5
Description
Material
Size (mm)
Total #
Item %
Cum %
Silt /Clay
sildclay
0 062
0%
0%
Sand
very fine sand
0 125
0%
0%
fine sand
025
0%
0%
medium sand
050
1
1%
1%
coarse sand
100
4
4%
5%
very coarse sand
200
8
7%
12%
Gravel
very fine gravel
40
0%
12%
fine gravel
57
1
1%
13%
fine gravel
80
0%
13%
medium gravel
113
1
1%
14%
medium gravel
160
0%
14%
coarse gravel
223
3
3%
17%
coarse gravel
32
19
17%
34%
very coarse gravel
45
15
14%
48%
very coarse gravel
64
20
18%
66%
Cobble
small cobble
90
8
7%
73%
medium cobble
128
20
18%
92%
large cobble
180
7
6%
98%
very large cobble
256
2
2%
1000/0
Boulder
small boulder
362
0%
1000/0
small boulder
512
0%
1000/0
medium boulder
1024
0%
100%
large boulder
2048
0%
100%
very large boulder
4096
0%
1000/0
Bedrock
bedrock
>4096
0%
100%
TOTALS
1
1 109
100%
100%
Kings Creek Final D -18 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc
Project No 208 November 2013
Monitoring Year 5 of 5
'
D50
47
D84
110
D95
150
Kings Creek Final D -18 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc
Project No 208 November 2013
Monitoring Year 5 of 5

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
Kings Creek Final
Project No. 208
Monitoring Year 5 of 5
D -19 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
November 2013
Kings Creek
Pebble Count - Percent Cumulative
Cross Section 3 - Riffle
100%
90%
—
80% e
ea
L
F.
70%
40
d
e
Lz
60%
v
—
50% 6
u
a
—
40% >
.W
30% E
—
e
U
20%
—
10%
0%
m
Particle Size (mm)
MV2 6116/2010 MY3 2/18/2011
' MY4 7/12/2012 MY5 3/28/2013
Kings Creek
Pebble Count - Percent Individual
Cross Section 3 - Riffle
25%
20%
is
15%
e
e
10%
Y
a
5%
0%
N V � �(, �
�O N
Q p —
N •f .0 X - .L N N �, "I � OC O D N N
- - N -f �. T 00 1A b r
N M VI
Q b
N !►
O O
�D Y
O� V
O O
d
6i
Particle Size (mm)
MY2 6/16/2010 OMY3 2/18/2011
OMY4 7112/2102 ■MY5 3/28/2013
Kings Creek Final
Project No. 208
Monitoring Year 5 of 5
D -19 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
November 2013

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
0
o. 208
13
Monrtormg Year 5
Description
Material
Size (mm)
Total #
Item %
Cum %
Silt /Clay
sdUclay
0 062
0%
0%
Sand
very fine sand
0 125
0%
0%
fine sand
025
9
9%
9%
medium sand
050
9
9%
18%
coarse sand
100
8
8%
26%
very coarse sand
200
9
9%
35%
Gravel
very fine gravel
40
0%
35%
fine gravel
57
1
1%
36%
fine gravel
80
2
2%
38%
medium gravel
113
4
4%
42%
medium gravel
160
18
18%
59%
coarse gravel
223
18
18%
77%
coarse gravel
32
17
17%
94%
very coarse gravel
45
6
6%
100%
very coarse gravel
64
0%
100%
Cobble
small cobble
90
0%
100%
medium cobble
128
0%
100%
large cobble
180
0%
100%
very large cobble
256
0%
100%
Boulder
small boulder
362
0%
100%
small boulder
512
0%
100%
medium boulder
1024
0%
100%
large boulder
2048
0%
100%
very large boulder
4096
0%
100%
Bedrock
bedrock
>4096
0%
100%
TOTALS1
101
100%
1000/0
Kings Creek Final D -20 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc
Project No 208 November 2013
Monitoring Year 5 of 5
D50
13
D84
26
D95
34
Kings Creek Final D -20 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc
Project No 208 November 2013
Monitoring Year 5 of 5

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
Kings Creek
Pebble Count - Percent Cumulative
Cross Section 4 - Pool
100%
90%
80%
C
W
L
70
d
C
60
50
u
CL
40% >
—
30
U
--
20%
--
10%
0%
m
Particle Size (mm)
MY2 6/16/2010 MY3 2/18/2011
MY4 7/12/2012 t MY5 3/28/2013
Kings Creek
Pebble Count - Percent Individual
Cross Section 4 - Pool
25%
20%
1�
W
15%
10°%
5%
0%
_
00 �L rl N V, R O 00 O b
00 N
N N Q 00
_
0 N R
�O a
O, V
v
m
Particle Size (mm)
■MY2 6/16/2010 13MY3 2/18/2011
■MY4 7/12/2012 ■MYS 3/28/2013
Kings Creek Final
Project No. 208
Monitoring Year 5 of 5
D -21 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
November 2013

Appendix D Stream Survey Data
M Y'"r _ _ _ ^I [E'er"
e e S
ti `� f,Table�l0a Baslin Stream Data ummary
r rte.,' s,ICi s Creek /�P,ro ect�No. 208
- t
i
't�� '�
Parameter
Gaugi Regional Cure Pre - Existing Condition
Reference Reach(es) Data
Design
Monitoring Baseline
Dl mensiag&I3_ubstrate-Rlffle
s LL UL Eq Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD
n
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD'
n
Min
Med
Max
Min
Mean
x
SD
n
Bankfull Width (ft)
242
255
7
N/A
2
Floodprone Width (f)
� l
>150
>150
0
N/A
2
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
2 1
22
[653
2
N/A
2
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
3 0
3 1
1
N/A
2
Bankfull Cross - Sectional Area (ft')
519
552
5
N/A
2
Width/Depth Ratio
l�
113
118
2
N/A
2
Entrenchment Ratio
® ®� _
-
-
_
-
-
-
-
-
-
>3 60
73 65
70
N/A
2
Bank Height Ratio
- _ _ _
10
10
1 1 U
1 1 0
N/A
2
Profile
Riffle Length (ft)
®_
293
460
444
682
132
10
Riffle Slope (ft /ft
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
0281 0026
00069
00059
00153
0 0039
10
Pool Length (ft)
S -
-
-
-
-
-
_
-
-
-
-
-
-
52 4
586
698
156
11
Pool Max Depth (ft)��
®_ -
14
22
23
34
05
11
Pool Spacing (ft)
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
985
150 6
143 2
220 9
409
8
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth (ft)
_ _
610
1108
107 5 173 0
35 2 12
Radius of Curvature (ft)
_ _ _
620
56 0 139 0
26 7 11
Rc Bankfull Width ft /ft)
_ _
Meander Wavelen li ft
L23'101
276 8
240 0 414 0
77 6 5
Meander Width Ratio
_ _ - -
-
- -
- - -
-
4 2
4 2 4 4
N/A 2
?ra nspori Painmgtere
Reach Shear Stress (competency) (lb /ft)
� O
Max part size (mm ) mobilized at bankfall
Stream Power trans ort ca acit W /m)
� -
-
Additlona�Reech Parameters
Rosgen Classification
-
C4
Bankfull Velocity (fps)
- - - -
Bankfull Discharge (cfs)
- - - -
Valley Length (ft)
® 1 694
Channel Thahveg Length (ft)
1,815
2 135
Sinuosity (ft)
® 1 07
128
Water Surface Slope (Channel) (ft /ft)
- ®
00049
Bankfull Slope (ft /ft)
®
00044
Bankfull Floodplain Area (acres)
% of Reach with Eroding Banks
Channel Stability or Habitat Metnc
Biological or Other
-
mtomation unavailable
N/A Information does not apply
Kings Creek Final D -22 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc
Project No 208 November 2013
Monitoring Year 5 of 5

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
TSble 106 Basel a Stream Data Summary
(Substrate, Bed, Bank, ead Hydrologic Coutammeat Parameter DishiboLoas)
Km s Creek / P,ro ct N-o 20S - Reaches wirwit II
Parameter Pre- Dasting Condition
Reference Reach(es) Data
Design Nbnitonng Baseline
Rt% /Ru% /P% /G% /S%
-
__
__
- --
33%
10%
41%
16%
0%
SC% /SA % /G % /C % /B % /Be%
d16 /d35 /d50 /d84 /d95 /diP /dt`P mm
Entrenchment Class
<15 /15 199/2 49/50 99/>10
■
■
e
■
■
■
■
■
■
■
■
-
-
-
Class
<12/12 149/15nc199/>20
■S■
®■■■■■■■■N
No
Zrci— nuns =romi u = "one,a =—p
= Sdt -Clay / SA = Sand / G = Gmvel / C =Cobble/ B = Boulder/ Bc = Bedrock
d? =max pave /di' =max sub pave
Infomat ton unavailable
Kings Creek Final
Project No 208
Monitoring Year 5 of 5
D -23
Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc
November 2013

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
KBIM a. ' o ' o ' MEMO ' o ho o , nmmaty
s
Cross - Section 1
Riffle
Cross - Section 2
Pool
Dimension
Base
MYI
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
Record elevation (datum) used
-
2108 9
2108 9
2108 9
2108 9
-
-
21081
21081
21081
2108 1
Bankfull Width (ft)
267
268
268
275
272
31 I
303
298
296
276
Flood prone Width (ft)
>150
>150
>150
>150
>I50
>150
>150
>150
>150
>150
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
22
22
21
20
20
25
l9
19
19
20
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
31
33
33
33
34
47
37
35
34
33
Bankfull Cross - Sectional Area (ft`)
585
580
573
56 1
552
766
585
556
550
54 1
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
122
124
125
13 5
134
127
157
160
15 9
141
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
>3 7
>5 6
>5 6
>5 4
>5 5
>3 9
>4 9
>5 0
>5 1
>5 4
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
10
1 0
10
10
10
10
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
Cross - Sectional Area Between End Pms (ft`)
-
596
584
566
56 1
-
61 6
574
57 1
559
d50 (mm)
24
13
17
33
16
17
29
1 16
Cross - Section 3
Riffle
Cross - Section 4
Pool
D mk on
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
Base
MYI
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
Record elevation (datum) used
-
2104 7
2104 7
2104 7
2104 7
-
-
21041
21041
21041
2104 1
Bankfull Width (ft)
242
25 7
256
25 8
279
283
25 8
259
241
22 8
Floodprone Width (ft)
>150
>150
>150
>150
>150
>150
>150
>150
>150
>150
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
21
21
20
21
18
20
25
26
27
29
Bankfull MaxDepth (ft)
30
32
31
31
31
31
44
45
45
42
Bankfull Cross - Sectional Area (ft -)
51 9
53 1
520
530
51 1
55 5
63 1
674
659
653
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
11 3
124
126
125
15 3
144
105
99
88
79
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
>3 6
>5 8
>5 9
>5 8
>5 4
>3 2
>5 8
>5 8
>6 2
>66
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
10
10
1 0
10
1 0
10
10
10
1 0
1 0
Cross - Sectional Area Between End Pins (ft`)
-
602
593
594
56 1
-
661
693
676
665
d50 (mm)
33
24
12
47
-
13
2
2
13
- Information unavailable
Kings Creek Final D -24 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc
Project No 208 November 2013
Monitoring Year 5 of 5

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
mormation unavmiame
N/A Information does not apply
Ri = Riffle/R­ Run / P -Pool /G = Gltde / S = Step
SC = Sib Clay / SA - Sand / G = Gravel / C - Cobble / B = Bouldm / Be = Bedrock
Pmenta®s based on riffle and pool pebble counts
Kings Creek Final
Project No 208
Monitoring Year 5 of 5
D -25 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc
November 2013
Tab 1 1b Monkoriog eta - beam Reuh llYffi S®maly
KID Greek Sro cbNo. 08- each HI
MY 1 MY -2 1 MY -3
Parameter
MY -4
MY -5
Baseilne
DIt>xaV ®B<T8a6ctnte - RrID7
Bankfull Width 1
Ift-91
bteae
1Wd]
t8D7
WOE
1WRI
IMeI a1
II
M—A
ISDN
Witt♦
M11
257
We"
263
5W41
263
268
N/A
2
256
JUI
262
�lYoul
1 262
illfec
268
iSD1
N/A
rn1♦
2
/Min7
258
IMea -1n
267
kHr'dl fM1ta -1
267 275
/9Dl
N/A
inl♦
2
Mira
272
IMe'wl
276
IMa'dl
276
'1
279
/eD7
N/A
to7
2
242
255
255
267
N/A
2
Flood ronc Width (it)
1150
1150
>150
>150
N/A
2
>150
>150
>150
1150
N/A
2
>150
1150
>150
1150
N/A
2
1150
1150
1150 >150
N/A
2
>150
>150
>150
>150
N/A
2
Bankfull Mean Depth 1
2 1
2 2
22
2 2
N/A
2
2 1
2 2
2 2
2 2
1 N/A
2
20
2 1
N/A
2
20
2 1
2 1 2 1
N/A
2
1 8
19
1 9
20
N/A
2
Bankfull McXDepth I
30
31
31
31
N/A
2
32
33
33
33
N/A
2
31
N/A
2
31
32
32 33
N/A
31
33
33
34
N/A
2
Bankfull Cross Sectional Aria (R
51 9
55 2
55 2
5R 5
N/A
2
53 1
55 6
55 6
SR 0
N/A
2
52 0
N/A
2
53 0
54 6
54 6 56 1
N/A
2
51 1
53 2
53 2
55 2
N/A
2
Width/D th Ratio
113
118
118
122
N/A
2
124
124
124
124
N/A
125
j32
g8>5
N/A
2
125
130
130 135
N/A
2
134
144
144
153
N/A
Lntrcnchmcnt Ratio
>3 6
>3 7
>3 7
>3 7
N/A
2
>5 6
>3 7
>5 7
>5 8
N/A
2
>5 6
N/A
2
>5 4
>5 6
>3 6 >5 8
N/A
2
>5 4
>5 5
>5 5
>5 5
N/A
2
Bank Hci t Ratio
1 0
1 0
1 0
1 0
N/A
2
1 0
t 0
1 0
1 0
N/A
2
1 0
N/A
2
1 0
10
10 10
1 N/A
2
1 0
1 1 0
10
10
N/A
2
PTIBa
Riffle lain h ffl) 293
460
1 444
682
132 10
95
347
333
588
166
10
108
257
256
630 155
10 119 334 305
609
156
9
135
352
312 582 143 9
130 348
362
590
128 9
Riflle Slo e(0 /R
0003
0007
0006
0015
0004 10
0005
0013
0010
0027
0008
10
0003
0017
0020
0025 0009
10 0004 0013 0012
0029 0007
9
0004
0013
0012 0027 0008
9
0002
0015
0013
0034
0010 9
Pool Lcn h(11)
281
524
586
698
156 11
129
357
322
879
189
22
144
414
381
998 217
22 147 383 339
1007 214
21
151
382
374 967 21 I
21
148
403
385
978
224 23
Pool M-Depth (1
31
39
39
47
N/A 2
37
41
41
44 N/A
2 35 40 40
45 N/A
2
40
51
50 72 O8
21
39
48
47
64
06 22
Pools acm (R
985
1506
1432
2209
409 8
229
946
1012
1705
409
21
320
798
711
2141 414
21 305 886 933
1833 383
19
382
897
848 1615 354
19
311
869
834
1728
357 21
l3ttam
Channel Belt Width (B)
1 610 1 1108 1 1075 1 17301 35 2 1 12
S
S
Radius of Curvature ffl)I
41 0 1 620
1 560 1 1390
1 267
11
Re Bankfull Width (il /B
Meander Wavelen h (R)
1 231 0 1 2768
1 2400 1 4140
1 776
5
Meander Width RallO
40 42
42 44
N/A
2
mil♦ ����
Addi8an`_td�Rea�hn,m
RosWn Classficauon
C4
C4
C4
C4
C4
Channel Thatweg Length (R)
2 119
2 189
2 135
2 138
2 101
2092
Smuostl (B )
125
129
129
128
126
125
Water Surlacc Slope (Channel) (R /R)
00049
00050
00048
00048
00048
00049
Bankfull Slope (ft/ft)
00044
00051
00052
00049
0 0048
00051
Ri% /Ru % /P % /G % /S%•
33%
10%
41%
1 16%
1 0%
22%
1 II%
1 51% 1 16%
1 0%
16%
6%
1 57%
21%
0%
i7%
9%
45%
28%
0%
17%
12%
44%
26%
0%
16%
14%
47%
23%
0%
SC % /SA " % /G % /CBo /B% /Be %�����
������
0%
17%
71%
I3%
0%
0%
0%
27 °/
68%
5%
0%
0%
5%
26%
59%
10%
0%
0%
0%
23%
62%
IS%
0%
0%
d16/d35/d50/dR4/d95 mm
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
% of Reach with 'c'ui Banks
0%
11 %
15%
15%
15%
16%
Channel Stabibt y or Habitat M etne
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Biolo cal or Otha
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
mormation unavmiame
N/A Information does not apply
Ri = Riffle/R­ Run / P -Pool /G = Gltde / S = Step
SC = Sib Clay / SA - Sand / G = Gravel / C - Cobble / B = Bouldm / Be = Bedrock
Pmenta®s based on riffle and pool pebble counts
Kings Creek Final
Project No 208
Monitoring Year 5 of 5
D -25 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc
November 2013

Appendix E
Hydrologic Data

Appendix E
Hydrologic Data
Date of Data Date of
Collection Occurrence
Method
Photo #
(if available)
6/15/2010
Unknown
Crest gauge & wrack lines
11/9/2010
Unknown
Crest gauge & wrack Ines
1/20/2011
Unknown
Crest gauge & wrack lines
10/2612011
9/6/2011
Crest gauge & wrack Ines
1/18/2012
11/29/2011
Crest gauge & wrack tines
10/15/2012
9/19/2012
Crest gauge & wrack Ines
3/28/2013
1/31/2013
Crest gauge & wrack Ines
7/25/2013
07/03/13
Precipitation data & anecdotal evidence
Kings Creek Final
Protect No 208
Monitoring Year 5 of 5
I-v,
E -1 Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc
November 2013