20140043 Ver 1_401 Application_20140114

�
�
January 10, 2014
Ms. Jennifer Burdette, 401/Buffer Coordinator
1650 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1650
Re: PNG Line 43 Replacement project
Pitt County, North Carolina
Dear Ms. Burdette:
� 1 � ^ �, �; 3
,
Please find enclosed five (5) complete sets of the Pre-Construction Notification (PCN)
application form and supporting documentation that was sub�nitted to the US Army Corps of
Engineers on January 10, 2014, for a Department of the Army Nationwide Permit #] 2 to disturb
Waters of the United States for the installation of a natural gas pipeline. Piedmont Natural Gas
(Applicant) would appreciate you reviewing this PCN application for the associated 401 General
Water Quality Certification. We have enclosed a check for $240.00, made payable to "NC
Division of Water Resources," for the application review fee.
Please call me at [phone] if you should have any questions regarding this submittal.
Sincerely,
URS Corporation — North Carolina
Sincerely,
URS Corporation — North Carolina
i
/
� •r
Charles E. Benton, PWS
Senior Environmental Scientist
Enclosures
cc: Mr. William Wescott, USACE
Mr. Chris Albers, PNG
File copy
URS Corporation — North Carolina
1600 Perimeter Park Drive, Suite 400
Morrisville, NC 27560
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
www.urscorp.com
,�� � '� `�
����Qe�
D
JAN132014
n �-�!�
�da & t�,,,:...---� AL!

�
January 10, 2014
Mr. William Wescott, Project Manager
Washington Regulatory Field Office
US Army Corps of Engineers
2407 West Fifth Street Washington, NC 27889
Re: PNG Line 43 Replacement project
Pitt County, North Carolina
Dear Mr. Wescott:
It was a pleasure meeting you during our recent field visit to the project site on Deceinber 19,
2013. Per our discussion, I a�n submitting, on behalf of Piedmont Natural Gas (PNG), a
preliminary Jurisdictional Determination package and a Pre-Construction Notification (PCN)
application for the PNG Line 43 Replacement project located in Greenville, Pitt County, North
Carolina. v� accordance with Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC 1344), we are
requesting authorization for a Department of the Army Nationwide Permit #12 to disturb Waters
of the United States for the installation of a natural gas pipeline. Please find enclosed a project
description for this project, along with supporCing documentation and figures.
Please call me at (9l9) 461-1435 if you should have any questions regarding this request.
Sincerely,
URS Corporation — North Carolina
�
/
�
%1 .lr
Charles E. Benton, PWS
Senior Environmental Scientist
Enclosures
cc: Ms. Jennifer Burdette, NCDWR
Mr. Chris Albers, PNG
File copy
URS Corporation — North Carolina
1600 Perimeter Park Drive, Suite 400
Morrisville, NC 27560
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
www.urscorp.com

Piedmont
Natural Gas
November 20, 2013
RE: Authorization far URS to act as agent on behalf of Owner
To wham it tnay concern:
This letter is to confirm tl�at URS Corporation- North Caroiina, 1600 Perimeter Park Drive,
STE 400, Morrisville, North Carolina is acting as agent on behalf of Piedmont Natural Gas for
tlle Line 43 Replacement Project located in tl�e City of Greenville, Pi�t Couniy, Nortl�
Carolina. This authorization is for the delineation of jurisdictionaI water resources, and
processing of subsequent permit applications, including:
U.S. Corps of Engineers (USACE) Section 404 Clean Water Act- Nationwide Permit
12: and
N.C. Department of the Environment and Natural Resources - Division of Water
Resouxces (NCDENR-DWR) Section 401 Clean Water Act- Water Quality
Certification
NCDENR-DWR — Tar-Pamlico Riparian Buffer Rules — Authorization
Any required written conespondence concerning the application process or ather aspects of
this project should be jointly capied to URS Corporation - North Carolina and Piedmont
Natural Gas at the address shown below:
Name: Chris Albers, PE, PMP
Title: Senior Praject Manager
Organization: Fiedmont Natural Gas
Address: 4720 Piedmont Row Drive, Chariotte, NC 28210
PIease contact Charles Benton witli any c�uestions at (919} 461-1435.
Sincerely,
r �r�
Chris R. Alber
4720 Pledmani Rci'd� Crf'f� � Cllal'loti�, h!C 22310
piedmontrig.corn
���\
J �'� I
q
N�
� 3 241�

oa�� W AT F9°�
� �v
� �r
ti
O <
Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.4 January 2009
Pre-Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A. Applicant Information
1. Processing
1 a. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps: �X Section 404 Permit ❑ Section 10 Permit
1 b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 1 z or General Permit (GP) number:
1 c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps? ❑X Yes ❑ No
1 d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
❑X 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization
1 e. Is this notification solely for the record For the record only for DWQ For the record only for Corps Permit:
because written approval is not required? 401 Certification:
❑ Yes ❑X No ❑ Yes ❑X No
1f. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in-lieu fee program proposed for
mitigation of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank X� Yes ❑ No
or in-lieu fee program.
1 g. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h � Yes ❑X No
below.
1 h. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)? ❑ Yes QX No
2. Project Information
2a. Name of project: PNG Line 43 Replacement
2b. County: Pitt County
2c. Nearest municipality / town: Greenville
2d. Subdivision name:
2e. NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state project no:
3. Owner Information
3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed:
3b. Deed Book and Page No.
3c. Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable):
3d. Street address:
3e. City, state, zip:
3f. Telephone no.:
3g. Fax no.:
3h. Email address:
Page 1 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

4 Applicant Information (if d�fferent from owner)
4a Applicant is ❑ Agent ❑ Other, specify Piedmont Natural Gas
4b Name Chns Albers
4c Busmess name Piedmont Natural Gas
(if applicable)
4d Street address 4720 Piedmont Row Dnve
4e City, state, zip Chariotte, NC 28210
4f Telephone no
4g Fax no
4h Emad address
5 Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a Name Charlie Benton, PWS
5b Busmess name URS Corporation
(if applicable)
5c Street address 1600 Perimeter Park Drive, STE 400
5d City, state, zip Mornsville, NC 27560
5e Telephone no 919 461 1435
5f Fax no 919 461 1415
5g Emad address charles benton@urs com
Page 2 of 10

B. Project Information and Prior Pro�ect History
1 Property Identification
1a Property identification no (tax PIN or parcel ID)
1 b Site coordinates (in decimal degrees) Latitude 35 590889 Longitude -77 45108
1 c Property size 33 71 acres
2 Surtace Waters
2a Name of nearest body of water to proposed pro�ect Greens Mill Run
2b Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water C, NSW
2c River basm Tar-Pamlico - 03020102
3. Pro�ect Description
3a Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the pro�ect at the time of th�s
apphcation
The pro�ect site is located in urban and rural areas of southwest Greenville, NC (Figure 1- Vicinity Map) The ma�ority of the proposed route is located
ad�acent to an overhead utdity Ime See Pro�ect Descnption for additional land use descnptions
3b List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property 0 5
3c List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perenrnal) on the property 0
3d Explam the purpose of the proposed pro�ect
Natural gas pipeline replacement pro�ect See Pro�ect Descnption for additional detads
3e Descnbe the overall pro�ect in detail, including the type of equipment to be used
See Pro�ect Descnption Standard pipeline construction eqwpment wdl be used Road crossings and rad Ime crossings v�nll use directional dnllmg
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a Have �urisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the � Yes �X No ❑ Unknown
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
ro ect mcludin all nor hases in the ast� Comments See NCDOT Coordination in Pro�ect Descnption
4b If the Corps made the �unsdictional determination, what type � Preliminary ❑ Final
of determination was made�
4c If yes, who delineated the �urisdictional areas� Agency/Consultant Company uRs
Name (if known) char�es Benton, uRS Other
4d if yes, list the dates of the Corps �urisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation
A prelimmary JD package is included as part of this PCN Site visit with USACE conducted on 12/19/2013 See NCDOT Coordination m the Pro�ect
Descnption
5 Pro�ect History
5a Have permits or certifications been requested or obtamed for �Yes � No ❑ Unknown
this pro�ect (mcluding all pnor phases) in the past�
5b If yes, explain in detad according to "help file" instructions
6 Future Pro�ect Plans
6a Is this a phased pro�ect� ❑ Yes ❑X No
6b If yes, explain
Page 3 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1 4 January 2009

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1 Impacts Summary
1 a Which sections were completed below for your pro�ect (check all that apply)
❑X Wetlands ❑ Streams — tnbutanes ❑ Buffers ❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2 Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted
2a 2b 2c 2d 2e 2f
Wetland impact Type of impact Type of wetland Forested Type of �unsdiction Area of
number Corps (404,10) or impact
Permanent (P) or DWQ (401, other) (acres)
Tem ora
W1 T Land Clearing Hardwood Flat Yes Corps 0 75
W2 - Choose one Choose one Yes/No -
W3 - Choose one Choose one Yes/No -
�/4 - Choose one Choose one Yes/No -
W5 - Choose one Choose one Yes/No -
W6 - Choose one Choose one Yes/No -
2g Total Wetland Impacts:
2h Comments
The pro�ect wdl clear 0 75 acres (50-wnde easement) for the construction of the pipeline through the wetland area usmg an open cut method A 30-foot
easement (0 44 acre) wdl be permanently maintained within the wetland (forest to emergent wetland conversion) The remaining 20-foot easement
(0 31 acre) wdl be allowed to revert to a forested condition
3 Stream Impacts
If there are perenrnal or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted
3a 3b 3c 3d 3e 3f 3g
Stream impact Type of impact Stream name Perennial (PER) or Type of Average Impact
number intermittent (IN�? �unsdiction stream length
Permanent (P) or width (Imear
Temporary (T) (feet) feet)
S1 - Choose one - -
S2 - Choose one - -
S3 - Choose one -
S4 - Choose one - -
S5 - Choose one - -
S6 - Choose one - -
3h Total stream and tributary impacts
3i Comments
Page 4 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1 4 January 2009

4 Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuanes, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U S then mdividuall list all o en water im acts below
4a 4b 4c 4d 4e
Open water Name of waterbody
impact number (if applicable) Type of impact Waterbody Area of impact (acres)
Permanent (P) or type
Tem ora T
01 - Choose one Choose
�2 - Choose one Choose
03 - Choose one Choose
04 - Choose one Choose
4f Total open water impacts
4g Comments
5 Pond or Lake Construction
if ond or lake construction ro osed, then com lete the chart below
5a 5b 5c 5d 5e
Pond ID number Proposed use or Wetland Impacts (acres) Stream Impacts (feet) Upland
purpose of pond (acres)
Flooded Fdled Excavated Flooded Fdled Excavated
P1 Choose one
P2 Choose one
5f Total:
5g Comments
5h Is a dam high hazard permit reqwred� ❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no
5i Expected pond surface area (acres)
5� Size of pond watershed (acres)
5k Method of construction
6 Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If pro�ect will impact a protected npanan buffer, then complete the chart below If yes, then indwidually list all buffer impacts
below If an im acts re uire miti ation, then ou MUST fill out Section D of this form
6a Pro�ect is in which protected basm� ❑ Neuse � Tar-Pamlico � Catawba � Randleman ❑ Other
6b 6c 6d 6e 6f 6g
Buffer Impact Reason for impact Stream name Buffer Zone 1 Zone 2
number — mitigation impact impact
Permanent (P) or required� (square (square
Tem ora T feet feet
B1 - Yes/No
62 - Yes/No
B3 _ Yes/No
g4 - Yes/No
B5 - Yes/No
gg - Yes/No
6h Total Buffer Impacts
6i Comments
Page 5 of 10

D. Impact Justif�cation and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1a Specifically descnbe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designmg pro�ect
The proposed route was designed to mirnmize impacts to wetland areas Within the one W-1 wetland area, the standard 50-foot �nnde permanent
maintenance easement has been reduced to a 30-foot v�nde easement
1 b Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques
Construction equipment mats wtll be used m this area to mmimize ground disturbance in this area In addition, super sdt fence, coir filter outlets, and
diversion terraces wdl be mstalled to mmimize sediment impacts to the ad�acent wetland areas
2. Com ensato Miti ation for Im acts to Waters of the U S. or Waters of the State
2a Does the pro�ect require Compensatory Mitigation for ❑X Yes ❑ No
impacts to Waters of the U S or Waters of the State�
2b If yes, mitigation is required by (check ali that apply) ❑ DWQ ❑X Corps
❑ Mitigation bank
2c If yes, which mitigation option wdl be used for this ❑X Payment to in-lieu fee program
pro�ect�
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3 Com lete if Usm a Miti at�on Bank
3a Name of Mitigation Bank
Type Choose one Quantity
3b Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter) Type Choose one Quantity
Type Choose one Quantity
3c Comments
4 Com lete if Makin a Pa ment to In-lieu Fee Pro ram
4a Approval letter from in-lieu fee program is attached �X Yes
4b Stream mitigation requested linear feet
4c If using stream mitigation, stream temperature Choose one
4d Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only) square feet
4e Ripanan wetland mitigation requested acres
4f Non-npanan wetland mitigation requested 0 5 acres
4g Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested acres
4h COmmefltS No pnvate mitigation banks available Approval is conditional for Small Impacts Policy
5 Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a If usmg a permittee responsible mitigation plan, prowde a descnption of the proposed mitigation plan
Page 6 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1 4 January 2009

6 Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — reqwred by DWQ
6a Wdl the pro�ect result in an impact within a protected npanan buffer that requires � Yes �X No
buffer mitigation�
6b If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the npanan buffer that reqwres mitigation Calculate the
amount of mitigation required
6c 6d 6e
Zone Reason for impact Totai impact Multiplier Required mitigation
(square feet) (square feet)
Zone 1 3(2 for Catawba)
Zone 2 1 5
6f Total buffer mitigation reqwred
6g If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e g, payment to pnvate mitigation bank,
permittee respons�ble npanan buffer restoration, payment mto an approved m-lieu fee fund)
6h Comments
Page 7 of 10

E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1. D�ffuse Flow Pian
1 a Does the pro�ect include or is it ad�acent to protected ripanan buffers identified � Yes ❑X No
withm one of the NC Ri anan Buffer Protection Rules�
1 b if yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included� If no, explain why
� Yes � No
2. Stormwater Mana ement Plan
2a What is the overall percent imperviousness of this pro�ect� p o�o
2b Does this ro ect re uire a Stormwater Mana ement Plan� ❑ Yes � No
2c If this pro�ect DOES NOT reqwre a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why
Pro�ect acUvity is a Imear underground utility line pro�ect
2d if this pro�ect DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a bnef, narrative description of the plan
2e Who wdl be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan�
3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a In which local overnmenYs unsdiction is this ro ect�
❑ Phase II
3b Which of the following locally-implemented stormwater management programs ❑ NSW
� USMP
apply (check all that apply) � Water Supply Watershed
� Other
3c Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been ❑ Yes ❑ No
attached�
4 DWQ Stormwater Pro ram Rewew
�Coastal counties
❑HQW
4a Which of the following state-implemented stormwater management programs apply �ORW
(check all that apply) ❑Session Law 2006-246
❑Other
4b Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been � Yes ❑ No
attached�
5 DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropnate requirements? � Yes � No
5b Have all of the 401 Urnt submittal requirements been met? � Yes � No
Page 8 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1 4 January 2009

F. Supplementary Information
1 Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1 a Does the pro�ect mvolve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the � Yes �X No
use of public (federal/state) land?
1 b If you answered "yes" to the above, does the pro�ect reqwre preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the reqwrements of the National or State ❑ Yes ❑ No
(North Carolma) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)�
1 c If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
letter ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
Comments
2 Violat�ons (DWQ Requirement)
2a Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H 0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H 1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards, ❑Yes ❑X No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B 0200)�
2b Is this an after-the-fact permit application� ❑Yes ❑X No
2c If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s)
3 Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a Will this pro�ect (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in �Yes �X No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality�
3b If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description
The pro�ect is an underground utdity Ime pro�ect The new utdity line replaces and existing utility line No new service area
4 Sewage D�sposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed pro�ect, or avadabie capacity of the sub�ect facdity
Page 9 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1 4 January 2009

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or � Yes ❑X No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act � Yes ❑X No
impacts?
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted. -
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
NC Natural Heritage Program data base, and field visit.
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat? ❑ Yes ❑X No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
http://www.habitat.noaa.gov/protection/efh/habitatmapper.html
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation � Yes �X No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
A historic/archeological survey was performed by URS; no historic or archeological resources were identified. A Phase I Archaeological survey report
was prepared. In their January 10. 2014 letter, NC HPO concurred that there are no archaeological concerns for this project (Attachment E).
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain? ❑ Yes �X No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?
http://floodmaps.nc.gov
Charles Benton � � � 01-10-2014
Applicant/AgenYs Printed Name Applican Agent's Signature Date
(AgenCs signature is valid only if an authorization
letter from the a licant is rovided.)
Page 10 of 10

PNG L�ne 43 Replacement Pro�ect
Proiect Description
PCN Appl�cation
Piedmont Natural Gas (PNG) proposes to construct natural gas pipelines near Greenville in Pitt County,
North Carohna (Figure 1) PNG plans to construct Lme 400, a six-mch pipel�ne, which is intended to
replace an existmg natural gas pipelme termed Lme 43 Line 400 will connect to Greenville Utilities
Commission's (GUC) Crty Gate #3 at the northern ternunus of the pipehne A short lateral pipehne, Lme
401, a six-mch pipehne, will connect Lme 400 to GUC's Crty Gate #5 near the southern terrrunus of Lme
400 Finally, PNG plans to construct a short natural gas pipehne, Lme 403, a six-mch pipehne, to service
GUC's City Gate #2 off Landmark Street m the city of Greenville "City Gate" refers to a pressure let
down system consistmg of a pipmg arrangement wrth pressure control valves that converts the received
high pressure natural gas to a lower pressure suitable for utilities distnbution to residences and
busmesses URS Corporation (URS) performed a wetland iield delmeation of the proposed pipehnes'
Right-of-Ways (ROW), temporary work spaces (TWS), and a temporary construction storage yard
associated with these pipelmes The pipehne ROWs, T'WSs, and temporary construction storage yards
are depicted on the attached 404/401 Permit Plans
The Lme 400 and 401 pipehnes are approximately 3 76 rrules long (combmed) withm a permanent ROW
that is 50 feet wide Total acreage of the permanent ROW is 23 22 acres, which mcludes City Gate #3
(north end) and City Gate #5 (south end) Temporary work spaces, pnmarily at road crossings for
bonng/directional dnll work, totals 4 81 acres The temporary construction storage yard is 4 65 acres
Lme 403 and the City Gate #2 permanent ROW consists of 0 93 acres and TWS for Crty Gate #2 is 0 10
acres for a total acreage for Lme 403/City Gate #2 of 1 03 acres The grand total of acreage for the
pro�ect is 33 71 acres
T'he anticipated construction let date is February 7, 2014 Construction is proposed to begm on February
10, 2014 and end by April 30, 2014
General Land Use
The proposed Lme 400 pro�ect area is located southwestern portion of Greenville, North Carolina The
pipehne route would cross several two-lane roadways, mcludmg Diclanson Avenue, Frog Level Road,
and Stantonsburg Road The pipehne would also cross a four-lane highway (US 64) near the John P East
Memorial Highway interchange, and a rail lme south of Statonsburg Road In the vicmity of Dicicinson
Avenue to the south of the pro�ect area, and the John P East Memonal Highway mterchange to the north
of the pro�ect area, the land use is characterized as commercial development and residential homes
Between the southern and northern portions of the pro�ect area, the pro�ect alignment is pnmarily located
ad�acent to an overhead utility easement and ad�acent to a future NCDOT Greenville Southwest Bypass
ROW Land use within this area is pnmarily charactenzed as agricultural iields (corn) and timber
plantations (loblolly pine) The Lme 403 area is located m a mamtamed commercial property off of
Landmark Street m the crty of Greenville The temporary construction storage yard is located on an
agricultural iield at the southwest intersection of Route 13 and Speight Seed Farm Road
Environmental Features
The pro�ect area is located m the Coastal Plam physiographic region The pro�ect is located on the
boundary between the Tar-Pamlico River basm (to the north) and the Neuse Rrver basm (to the south)
(Figure 1) The proJect route traverses relatively level mter-stream tenam Wrthin the pro�ect area, no
streams were mapped on the USGS 7 5 Greenville, NC SW quadrangle topographical map or the Pitt
County Soil Survey
1 Applicant - Piedmont Natural Gas

PNG Lme 43 Replacement Pro�ect PCN Application
The onlme Web Soil Survey (WSS) application was utilized to gau� a prelirrunary understanding of the
soil types present within the Line 43 proJect area Withm the pro�ect areas, the followmg six soil types
are present Byars loam (By), Coxville sandy loam (Co), Goldsboro sandy loam, 0-1% slopes (GoA),
Goldsboro sandy loam, 1-6% slopes (GoB), Lynchburg fine sandy loam (Ly), Norfolk sandy loam, 1-6°l0
slopes (NrB), Oc�lla loamy fine sand, 0-4% slopes (OcB), Pantego loam (Pg), and Rams fine sandy loam
(Ra) Table 1 prov�des select details about the above soils In general, only two soil types withm the
pro�ect area are considered moderately well dramed to well dramed - Goldsboro and Norfolk The
remamder of the soil types withm the pro�ect area consists of vanations on poorly dramed soils
Table 1. Soils mapped within the PNG Line 43 Replacement Project Area.
Soil T e Code Draina e Pro�le
By Very poorly dramed Loam overlymg clay subsoil
Co Poorly dra�ned Loam overlymg sandy clay and sandy clay loam subsoils
GoA / GoB Moderately well dramed Fme sandy loam overlymg sandy clay loam subsoils
Ly Somewhat poorly dramed Fme sandy loam overlymg sandy ]oam and sandy clay loam s�bso�ls
NrB Well dramed Sandy loam overlymg sandy clay loam subsoils
OcB Somewhat poorly dramed Loamy fine sand overlymg sandy loam and sandy clay loam subsoils
Pg Very poorly drained Loam surface overlymg sandy clay loam subso�ls
Ra Poorly drazned F�ne sandy loams overlymg sandy loam and sandy clay loam subsoils
On October 10 and 22, and on November 19, 2013, URS conducted a pedestnan survey of the pro�ect
area URS identified one forested wetland (W-1) dunng their evaluation that was located �ust north of
Stantonsburg Road (Figure 2) (see prehrrunary Junsdicrional Deternunation (JD) package in Attachment
A) Wetland Determinarion Data Forms (B-1 to B-11) were completed along the pro�ect route to
document upland azeas as well (Attachment A) All of the documented soil bonng locations are depicted
on the attached 404/401 Pernut Plans Photographs of wetland W-1 and upland areas along the pro�ect
alignment are located m Attachment B
No streams were identified dunng the field survey The Lme 400 alignment crosses several non-
�unsdictional roadside and agncultural ditches (D-1 to D-10) along the pro�ect route None of the ditches
crossed by the pro�ect ahgnment were mapped on e�ther the USGS 7 5 Greenville, NC SW quadrangle
topographical map or the Pitt County Soil Survey All of these drtches were straight, artificial dramages
excavated through uplands and did not connect to wetlands NC DWQ Stream Identification Forms
(Version 4 11) were completed for each of these ditches to document their condition (Attachment A)
The ditches would be open cut for the pipeline crossing and restored to their ongmal condition subsequent
to construction, as depicted on the attached 404/401 Perrrut Plans Drtch D-3 is proposed to be relocated
approximately 9-10 feet east of the existmg ditch Photographs of each of the ditches are located m
Attachment B
NCDOT Coordination
A sigmficant port�on of the Line 400 pro�ect ahgnment will be srtuated ad�acent to the future NCDOT
Greenville Southwest Bypass (TIP R-2250) (Figure 3) URS contacted NCDOT on November 11, 2013
to request any wetland or stream delineation files that they rrught have for their pro�ect (see Attachment
C) On November 13, 2013, NCDOT provided URS with their wetland file for the R-2250 pro�ect No
�unsdictional wetlands or streams were mapped m the NCDOT wetland file wrthm PNG pro�ect area
2 Applicant - Piedmont Natural Gas

PNG Line 43 Replacement Pro�ect PCN Appl�cation
(Figure 3) The closest wetland mapped by NCDOT �s located approx�mately 650 feet north of Dicicroson
Avenue and 350 feet west of the PNG L�ne 43 Replacement pro�ect al�gnment (Figure 3) Subsequently,
URS called Mr Chris Rivenbark, Environmental Program Supervisor at NCDOT, to deterrrune �f a Final
JD had been �ssued for the NCDOT R-2250 pro�ect Mr Rivenbark said that a Final JD had been issued
for the NCDOT R-2250 proJect as depicted m their wetland file However Mr Rivenbark said that th�s
JD was older than five years and had expired Mr Rivenbark sa�d that new field studies were on-going
and that a new JD package for the NCDOT R-2250 pro�ect would be prepared m 2014
Wetland Impacts, Avoidance, and Minimization
No permanent fill impacts to wetlands or streams are proposed for the Lme 43 Replacement pro�ect All
land disturbed by the pro�ect construct�on activ�ties will be restored to their pre-construction conditions
To accommodate a utilrty hne mamtenance easement, a portion of one forested wetland (W-1) withm the
pro�ect ahgnment will be converted to an emergent wetland The pro�ect engineer inrtially proposed to
shift the pipelme alignment further south along Statonsburg Road to avoid the wetland area However,
the future NCDOT Greenville Southwest Bypass required the pipelme alignment to shift north to avoid
the future NCDOT ROW The wetland extends north m this area, shiftmg the pipelme ahgnment further
north would not avoid wetland impacts
A 50-foot wide construction easement is proposed m this wetland area to allow for an open cut
construction of the pipelme Construction eqwpment mats will be used m this area to rrumnuze ground
disturbance in this area In addrtion, super silt fence, coir filter outlets, and diversion terraces will be
installed to rrummize sediment impacts to the ad�acent wetland azeas Subsequent to construction, PNG
will only maintam a 30-foot permanent easement withm the wetland area (0 44 acre) The enrire wetland
easement area will be restored to its ongmal grade and seeded with a native wetland seed nux The
remaimng 20-feet of construction easement will be allowed to revert back to a forested condition via
natural seed recrurtment from the ad�acent canopy (0 31 acre) See sheet 9 of 9 of the attached 404/401
Pernut Plans
CompensatorV MiNgallon
For the 0 44 acre of permanent conversion of forested wetland to emergent wetland, PNG proposes a 1 1
compensatory rrutigation ratio PNG has apphed for compensatory riutigarion from the NC Ecosystem
Enhancement Program and has received conditional approval (see Attachment D) No pnvate wetland
mit�gation banks service the pro�ect's HUC
3 Applicant - P�edmont Natural Gos

Line 43
Replacement Project
Greenville
Pitt County
North Carolina
�/��� Piedr��or�t
(�} Natural Gas
Legend
� 8 Digit HUC
Project Route
'`'�'?
_�,_ � �
--���;- ,
��;_�,�� �`� ���}>�v��
.�_����
COUNTY
� Pitt
Neuse River Watershed
HUC - 03020202 8 03020203
ar-Pamlico River Watershed
HUC - 03020103
Figure 1
Project Vicinity
Dece�nber 2013
This map is for reference only

Line 43
Replacement Project
Greenville
Pitt County
North Carolina
�/��� Piedrriont
(V Natural Gas
Legend
o GPS Data Points
Project Route
_ � Delineated Wetland
� ����7
�' , �L-� V
C- � i
�—L �.
.�'
COUNTY
� Pitt
HUC - 03020103
Tar-Pamlico River Watershed
Subbasin 03-03-05
Figure 2
Wetland W-1
Novem6er201J
This map is for re(erence only.

Line 43
Replacement Project
Greenville
Pitt County
North Carolina
C/,�� Piedmont
(v Natural Gas
Legend
�� 8 Digit HUC
Project Route
�� NCDOT Wetland
— NCDOT R2250
Souice�. NCDOT
R2250 RDV_WET.Ve.dgn 8
R2250c RDV_DSN.dgn
obtained by URS on 11I732073
� � �4f ,
_� f ���Y��!
�' — ,V
COUNTY
- Pitt
Neuse River Watershed
HUC - 03020202 & 03020203
ar-Pamlico River Watershed
HUC - 03020103
Figure 3
NCDOT Wetlands
December 2013
Thls map is br re(erence only

Attachment A
Preliminary JD Request Form and Data Forms

ATTACHMENT PNG Line 43 Replacement Proiect
PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION FORM
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL
DETERMINATION (JD):
B. NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERSON REQUESTING PRELIMINARY JD:
Applicant•
Chris Albers, Senior Pro�ect Manager
Piedmont Natural Gas
4720 Piedmont Row Drive
Charlotte, NC 28210
Applicant's Agent
Charlie Benton, PWS
Senior Environmental Scientist
URS Corporation — North Carolina
1600 Perimeter Park Drive, STE 400
Morrisville, North Carolina 27560
C. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER:
D. PROJECT LOCATION(S) AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
(USE THE ATTACHED TABLE TO DOCUMENT MULTIPLE WATERBODIES
AT DIFFERENT SITES)
State NC County/parish/borough Pitt City Greenville
Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format).
Center - Lat. 35.600936° N, Long -77.442866° W
Universal Transverse Mercator
Name of nearest waterbody•
Tar-Pamlico River Watershed:
HUC # 03020102 — Greens Mill Run is the closest named stream located
approximately one mile southeast of Wetland W-1
Identify (estimate) amount of waters in the review area..
Non-wetland waters. 0 linear feet width (ft) and/or 0.75 acres
Cowardin Class
Stream Flow:
Wetlands 0 75 acres (see Figure 2)
Cowardin Class Palustrine Forested (PF01)

Name of any water bodies on the site that have been identified as Section 10
waters. IV/A
Tidal
Non-Tidal
E. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT
APPLY):
❑ Office (Desk) Determination Date
❑ Field Determination. Date(s).
1 The Corps of Engineers believes that there may be �urisdictional waters of the
United States on the sub�ect site, and the permit applicant or other affected party
who requested this preliminary JD is hereby advised of his or her option to
request and obtain an approved �urisdictional determination (JD) for that site.
Nevertheless, the permit applicant or other person who requested this
preliminary JD has declined to exercise the option to obtain an approved JD in
this instance and at this time
2 In any circumstance where a permit applicant obtains an individual permit, or
a Nationwide General Permit (NWP) or other general permit verification requiring
"pre-construction notification" (PCN), or requests verification for a non-reporting
NWP or other general permit, and the permit applicant has not requested an
approved JD for the activity, the permit appiicant is hereby made aware of the
following• (1) the permit applicant has elected to seek a permit authorization
based on a preliminary JD, which does not make an official determination of
Jurisdictional waters, (2) that the applicant has the option to request an approved
JD before accepting the terms and conditions of the permit authorization, and
that basing a permit authorization on an approved JD could possibly result in less
compensatory mitigation being required or different special conditions, (3) that
the applicant has the right to request an individual permit rather than accepting
the terms and conditions of the NWP or other general permit authorization, (4)
that the applicant can accept a permit authorization and thereby agree to comply
with all the terms and conditions of that permit, including whatever mitigation
requirements the Corps has determined to be necessary, (5) that undertaking
any activity in reliance upon the sub�ect permit authorization without requesting
an approved JD constitutes the appiicant's acceptance of the use of the
preliminary JD, but that either form of JD will be processed as soon as is
practicable, (6) accepting a permit authorization (e g, signing a proffered
individual permit) or undertaking any activity in reliance on any form of Corps
permit authorization based on a preliminary JD constitutes agreement that all
wetlands and other water bodies on the site affected in any way by that activity
are �urisdictionai waters of the United States, and precludes any challenge to
such �urisdiction in any administrative or �udicial compliance or enforcement
action, or in any administrative appeal or in any Federal court, and (7) whether
the applicant elects to use either an approved JD or a preliminary JD, that JD
�

will be processed as soon as is practicable Further, an approved JD, a proffered
individual permit (and all terms and conditions contained therein), or individual
permit denial can be administratively appealed pursuant to 33 C F R Part 331,
and that in any administrative appeal, �urisdictional issues can be raised (see 33
C.F R. 331.5(a)(2)) If, during that administrative appeal, it becomes necessary
to make an official determination whether CWA Jurisdiction exists over a site, or
to provide an official delineation of �urisdictional waters on the site, the Corps will
provide an approved JD to accomplish that result, as soon as is practicable
This preliminary JD finds that there "may be"waters of the United States on the
sub�ect pro�ect site, and identifies all aquatic features on the site that could be
affected by the proposed activity, based on the following information•
SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for preliminary JD (check all that apply
- checked items should be included in case file and, where checked and
requested, appropriately reference sources below)
� Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the
applicant/consultant. See Figures 1, 2, 3, and 404/401 Permit Plans
� Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the
applicant/consultant See USACE Wetland Determination Data Forms and
NCDWQ Stream Identification Forms in Attachment A
❑ Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report
❑ Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report
❑ Data sheets prepared by the Corps
❑ Corps navigable waters' study�
❑ U S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas•
❑ USGS NHD data
❑ USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps.
� U S. Geological Survey map(s) Cite scale & quad name 1 24,000 —
Greenville SW, NC 7 5 minute quadrangle
� USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey C�tation. Pitt
County Soil Survey, 1974, sheets 40 and 48
❑ National wetlands inventory map(s) Cite name
❑ State/Local wetland inventory map(s)
❑ FEMA/FIRM maps
❑ 100-year Floodplain Elevation is (National Geodectic Vertical Datum
of 1929)
� Photographs ❑ Aerial (Name & Date)
or � Other (Name & Date) See attached photographs in
Attachment B
❑ Previous determination(s) File no and date of response letter.
❑ Other information (please specify)
3

IMPORTANT NOTE: The information recorded on this form has not
necessarilv been verified bv the Corps and should not be relied upon for
later iurisdictional determinations.
Signature and date of
Regulatory Project Manager
(REQUIRED)
Applicant's Agent for Applicant
G
Signature and date of
person requesting preliminary JD
(REQUIRED, unless obtaining
the signature is impracticable)

Field Delineated Wetlands and Streams
Estimated
Site Cowardin amount of Class of aquatic
number Latitude Longitude Class aquatic resource
resource in
review area
W1 35 600936 -77.442866 PFO 0 75 acre Section 404/401
�urisdictional
wetland

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Pro�ecUS�te Line 43 Replacement C�tyiCounty Greenvdle/Pitt
appi�canUOwner Piedmont Natural Gas State NC
Investigator(s) Charles Benton - URS Corp Section, Township, Range
Landform (hdlslope, terrace, etc ) flat Local relief (concave, convex, none) none
Subregion (LRR or MLRA) LRR-P Lat 35 568980 Long '�� 447559
Sampling Date 10/10/2013
Sampling Point B-�
Slope (%) 0-1
Datum NAD-83
Sod Map Unit Name Lynchburg fine sandy loam (Ly) NWI classification
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year� Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks )
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed� Np Are "Normal Circumstances" present� Yes X No
Are Vegetation , Sod , or Hydrology naturally problematic� No (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks )
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present� Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Hydnc Sod Present? Yes No X X
within a Wetland7 Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present� Yes No x
Remarks
Maintained property boundary near southern portion of the pro�ect, ad�acent to an agricultural field
and residential properties
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators Secondarv Indicators (minimum of two reauuedl
Pnmarv Indicators (mmimum of one is reauired check all that aoalv) II Surface Soil Cracks (66)
�Surface Water (A1) r❑-� Aquatic Fauna (813) ❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
y� High Water Table (A2) 1��-1f Marl Deposits (B15) (LRR U) ❑ Drainage Patterns (B10)
LJ Saturation (A3) LJ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) � Moss Tnm Lines (616)
� Water Marks (B1) Q Oxidized Rhizospheres along �ivmg Roots (C3) II Dry-Season Water Table (C2)
�Sediment Deposits (B2) Q�-f Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) � Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Dnft Deposits (B3) LJ Recent Iron Reduction in Tdled Soils (C6) ❑ Saturation Visible on Aenal Imagery (C9)
Q, Algal Mat or Crust (B4) ❑ Thin Muck Surface (C7) ❑ Geomorphic Position (D2)
a Iron Deposits (B5) � Other (Explain in Remarks) II Shallow Aquitard (D3)
a Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (67) II FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
a Water-Stained Leaves (B9) � Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations
Surface Water Present� Yes No X Depth (inches)
Water Table Present� Yes No X Depth (inches)
Saturation Present� Yes No x Depth (mches) Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
mcludes ca tlla fnn e
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitonng well, aenal photos, prewous inspections), if avadable
Remarks
US Army Corps of Engmeers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2 0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) — Use scientific names of plants
Absolute Dommant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size 30 feet � % Cover Suecies� Status
� Pmus taeda - loblolly pine 20 Yes FAC
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
50% of total cover 10
Saplinq/Shrub Stratum (Plot size )
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Herb Stratum (Plot size
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size
1
2
3
4
5
50% of total cover
)
50% of total cover
)
Z� = Total Cover
20% of total cover 4
= Total Cover
20% of total cover
= Total Cover
20% of total cover
Samplmg Point B-�
Dominance Test worksheet
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC
Total Number of Dominant
Speaes Across All Strata
Percent of Dominant Speaes
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC
� (A)
1 �8�
100 �p�B�
Total % Cover of Multiolv bv
OBL species x 1 =
FACW species x 2 =
FAC species x 3 =
FACU speaes x 4 =
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals (A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetat�on Indicators
❑ 1- Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
✓❑ 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
a 3- Prevalence Index is s3 0'
a Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic
Defimtions of Four Vegetation Strata
Tree — Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in (7 6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height
Sapling/Shrub — Woody plants, excludmg vmes, less
than 3 in DBH and greater than 3 28 ft(1 m) tall
Herb — All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3 28 ft tall
Woody v�ne — All woody vines greater than 3 28 ft m
height
Hydrophytic
= Total Cover Vegetation
50% of total cover 20% of total cover Present? Yes X No
Remarks (If observed, list morphological adaptations below)
Maintained property boundary between agncultural field and residential properties Vegetation
consists of a hedge row of planted loblolly pines
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plam Region — Version 2 0

SOIL Sampling Point B-�
Profile Descnpt�on (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of mdicators )
Depth Matnx Redox Features
(inchesl Color (moist) % Color (mois8 % Tvpe Loc Texture Remarks
�-4 10 YR 4/1 � �� sandy loam 50/50 organic coating salUpepper appearance
4-12 10 YR 6/3 100 sandy loam
'T e C=Concentration, D=De letion, RM=Reduced Matnx, MS=Masked Sand Grams ZLocation PL=Pore Lmm , M=Matnx
Hydric Soil Indicators (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwlse noted ) Ind�cators for Problematic Hydric Solls'
� Histosol (A1) � Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U) �❑--I 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
�Histic Epipedon (A2) � Thin Dark SurFace (S9) (LRR S, T, U) �LnJ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
Black Histic (A3) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O) Tu� Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
� Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) � Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) -un Piedmont Floodplain Sods (F19) (LRR P, S, �
�Stratified Layers (A5) Depleted Matnx (F3) u Anomalous Bnght Loamy Sods (F20)
Orgarnc Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U) � Redox Dark Surface (F6) (MLRA 153B)
� 5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U) Depleted Dark SurFace (F7) ❑ Red Parent Material (TF2)
D Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U) � Redox Depressions (FS) � Very Shallow Dark Surtace (TF12)
D 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, � � Marl (F10) (LRR U) � Other (Explam in Remarks)
D Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) � Depleted Ochnc (F11) (MLRA 151)
� Thick Dark Surface (Al2) � Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, � 3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
� Coast Praine Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A) � Umbnc Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U) wetland hydrology must be present,
D Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S) Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151) unless disturbed or problematic
� Sandy Gleyed Matnx (S4) � Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 150B)
II Sandy Redox (S5) � Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 749A)
II Stripped Matnx (S6) Anomalous Bnght Loamy Sods (F20) (MLRA 149A, 753C, 153D)
D Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restnctrve Layer (if observed)
Type
Depth (inches) Hydric Soil PresentT Yes No X
Remarks
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2 0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Pro�ecUS�te Lme 43 Replacement C�ty/County Greenvdle/Pitt Sampl�ng Date 10/10/2013
ApplicanUOwner P�edmont Natural Gas State NC Sampling Point B-2
Investigator(s) Chafles Benton - URS Corp Section, Township, Range
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc ) flat Local relief (concave, convex, none) nOne Slope (%) �-�
Subregion (LRR or MLRA) LRR-P Lat 35 574916 Long -�� 450810 Datum NAD-83
Sod Map Unit Name Rams fine sandy loam (Ra) NWI classification
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explam in Remarks )
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology sigrnficantly disturbed� jvp Are "Normal Circumstances" present� Yes X No _
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic� No (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks )
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No is the Sampled Area
Hydric Sod Present� Yes No x within a Wetland� Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present� Yes No X
Remarks
Upland woods ad�acent to overhead utility line easement between Dickinson Avenue and Frog Level
Road
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators Secondarv Indicators (mmimum of two reqwred)
Primarv Indicators (minimum of one is reauired, check all that aoalvl � Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
�Surface Water (A1) ❑ Aquatic Fauna (613) ❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
High Water Table (A2) Q1--f Marl Deposits (B15) (LRR U) ❑ Drainage Pattems (B10)
� Saturation (A3) IJ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) g Moss Tnm Lines (616)
� Water Marks (61) II1�f Oxidized Rhizospheres along Lrving Roots (C3) ❑ Dry-Season Water Table (C2)
�Sediment Deposits (62) 1L�Jf Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) � Cra�sh Burrows (C8)
Drift Deposits (B3) L-I Recent Iron Reduction m Tdled Soils (C6) � Saturation Visible on Aenal Imagery (C9)
a Algal Mat or Crust (64) ❑ Thin Muck Surtace (C7) II Geomorphic Position (D2)
a Iron Deposits (65) � Other (Explain in Remarks) II Shallow Aquitard (D3)
a Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (67) II FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
a Water-Stained Leaves (B9) ❑ Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations
Surtace Water Present� Yes No X Depth (inches)
Water Table Present� Yes No X Depth (mches)
Saturation Present� Yes No X Depth (inches) Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
includes ca illa frm e
Descnbe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitonng well, aenal photos, previous inspections), if available
Remarks
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plam Region — Version 2 0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) — Use scientific names of plants Sampling Pomt B-2
Absolute Dominant Indicator pommance Test worksheet
Tree Stratum (Plot size 30 feet � % Cover Sqecies� Status Number of Dommant Species
� Pinus taeda - loblolly pme 100 Yes FAC That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC 5
Z Total Number of Dominant
3 Species Across All Strata 5
4
Percent of Dominant Species
5 That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC 100
6
� Prevalence Index worksheet
Total % Cover of Multiolv bv
8
50% of total cover 50
Saolinq/Shrub Stratum (Plot size 30 feet �
� Persea borbonia - red bay
2 Ilex opaca - Amencan holly
3
4
5
6
7
8
50% of total cover � �
Herb Stratum (Plot size 30 feet �
� Arundmana gigantea
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
50% of total cover 5
Woodv Vme Stratum (Plot size )
� Smdax rotundifolia
2
3
4
5
100 = Total Cover
20% of total cover Z�
10 Yes FACW
10 Yes FAC
Z� = Total Cover
20% of total cover 4
10 Yes FACW
10 = Total Cover
20% of total cover z
5 Yes FAC
5 = Total Cover
50% of total cover 2 5 20% of total cover �
Remarks (If observed, list morphological adaptations below)
Sampfe location within loblolly pine plantation
(A)
(B)
G°✓B)
OBL speaes x 1 =
FACW species x 2 =
FAC species x 3 =
FACU species x 4 =
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals (A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators
II1- Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
✓g 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
a 3- Prevalence Index is <_3 0'
a Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydnc sod and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata
Tree — Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 m(7 6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height
Saplmg/Shrub — Woody plants, excluding wnes, less
than 3 in DBH and greater than 3 28 ft(1 m) tall
Herb — All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3 28 ft tall
Woody vine — All woody wnes greater than 3 28 ft in
height
Hydrophyttc
Vegetation
Present? Yes X No
US Army Corps of Engmeers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plam Region — Version 2 0

SOIL Sampling Pomt B=2
Profile Description (Descnbe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of mdicators )
Depth Matnx Redox Features
(inches) Color (moisU % Color (moisU % Tvpe Loc Texture Remarks
�-�i 10YR 4/1 � �� sandy loam 50/50 organic coaimg salVpepper appearance
4-12 10YR 5/3 100 clayey loam
'T e C=Concentration, D=De letion, RM=Reduced Matnx, MS=Masked Sand Grains ZLocation PL=Pore Linin , M=Matnx
Hydr�c Sod Indicators (Applicable to all LRRs, unless othervvise noted ) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Sods'
� Histosol (A1) � Polyvalue Below Surface (SS) (LRR S, T, U) ❑ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
�Histic Epipedon (A2) � Thm Dark SurFace (S9) (LRR S, T, U) � 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
Black Histic (A3) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O) -n Reduced Vertic (F18) (outs�de MLRA 150A,8)
� Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) � Loamy Gleyed Matnx (F2) Tul Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, '1)
n Stratified Layers (A5) � Depleted Matrix (F3) u Anomalous Bnght Loamy Sods (F20)
LJ Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U) Redox Dark Surface (F6) (MLRA 1536)
�5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U) � Depleted Dark SurFace (F7) �❑l Red Parent Matenal (TF2)
Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U) Redox Depressions (F8) u Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
D 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, n � Marl (F10) (LRR U) � Other (Explain in Remarks)
Q Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) � Depleted Ochnc (F11) (MLRA 151)
II Thick Dark Surface (Al2) � Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, � 3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
�Coast Praine Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A) � Umbnc Surtace (F13) (LRR P, T, U) wetland hydrology must be present,
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S) � Delta Ochnc (F17) (MLRA 151) unless disturbed or problematic
� Sandy Gleyed Matnx (S4) � Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 1506)
�Sandy Redox (S5) Piedmont Floodplain Sods (F19) (MLRA 149A)
Stnpped Matnx (S6) Anomalous Bnght Loamy Sods (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
II Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictrve Layer (if observed)
Type
Depth (inches) Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
Remarks
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2 0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Pro�ect/S�te Lme 43 Replacement C�ty/County Greenvdle/Pitt Sampl�ng Date 10/10/2013
applicanUOwner Piedmont Natural Gas State NC Sampling Foint B-3
Investigator(s) Charles Benton - URS Corp Section, Township, Range
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc ) flat Local relief (concave, convex, none) none Slope (o�o� 0-1
Subregion (LRR or MLRA) LRR-P Lat 35 577649 Long '�� 452081 Datum NAD-83
Soil Map Unit Name Rains fine sandy loam (Ra) NWI classification
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year� Yes No (If no, explain in Remarks )
Are Vegetation , Sod , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? No Are "Normal Circumstances" present� Yes X No _
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic� No (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks )
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present� Yes X No Is the Sampied Area
Hydnc Sod Present? Yes No X withm a Wetland? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present� Yes No X —
Remarks
Upland woods south of Frog Level Road near pipeline route and temporary work space
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators Secondarv Indicators (minimum of two reawred)
Pnmarv Indicators (minimum of one is reawred. check all that a�plvl � Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
❑ Surface Water (A1) t❑--f Aquatic Fauna (B13) ❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surtace (68)
Q High Water Table (A2) �I--T� Mari Deposits (B15) (LRR U) ❑ Drainage Patterns (B10)
� Saturation (A3) tI--Jf Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) ❑ Moss Tnm Lines (B16)
�I Water Marks (B1) I--1 Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) ❑ Dry-Season Water Table (C2)
�Sediment Deposits (62) Q1--� Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) � Cra�sh Burrows (C8)
Dnft Deposits (63) I--J Recent Iron Reduction in Tdled Soils (C6) II Saturation Visible on Aenal Imagery (C9)
a Algal Mat or Crust (B4) � Thm Muck Surface (C7) ❑ Geomorphic Position (D2)
a Iron Deposits (B5) � Other (Explain in Remarks) II Shallow Aqwtard (D3)
a Inundation Visible on Aenal Imagery (B7) D FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
a Water-Stained Leaves (B9) � Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations
Surface Water Present� Yes No Depth (mches)
Water Table Present� Yes No Depth (inches)
Saturation Present� Yes No Depth (mches) Wetland Hydrology Present7 Yes No X
includes ca dla frm e
Descnbe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitonng well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if avadable
Remarks
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region – Version 2 0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) — Use scientific names of plants Sampling Point B-3
Absolute Dominant Indicator pommance Test worksheet
Tree Stratum (Plot size 30 feet � °/a Cover S�ecies� Status Number of Dominant Speaes
� Pmus taeda - loblolly pine 100 Yes FAC That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC �
2 Total Number of Dominant
3 Speaes Across All Strata �
4 Percent of Dominant Speaes
5 That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC 100
6 _
7
8
50% of total cover 50
Saplmq/Shrub Stratum (Plot size 30 feet �
� Persea borbonia - red bay
2 Ilex opaca - Amencan holly
3 Quercus rngra - water oak
q Lyonia luada - fetterbush
5
6
7
8 — -
50% of total cover � �
Herb Stratum (Plot size 30 feet �
� Arundinaria gigantea
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
50% of total cover Z 5
Woodv Vine Stratum (Plot size 30 feet �
� Smdax rotundifolia
2
3
4
5
100 = Total Cover
20% of total cover 20
5 Yes FACW
5 Yes FAC
5 Yes FAC
5 Yes FACW
20 = Total Cover
20% of total cover z
5
(A)
�B)
��B)
Total % Cover of Multiolv bv
OBL species x 1 =
FACW species x 2 =
FAC speaes x 3 =
FACU species x 4 =
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals (A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators
� 1- Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
✓[� 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
Q 3- Prevalence Index is <_3 0'
a Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
' Indicators of hydnc soil and wetland hydrology must
Yes FACW be present, unless disturbed or problematic
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata
Tree — Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 m(7 6 cm) or
more m diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height
SaplinglShrub — Woody plants, excludmg wnes, less
than 3 in DBH and greater than 3 28 ft(1 m) tall
Herb — All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3 28 ft tall
Woody vme — All woody vines greater than 3 28 ft in
height
5 = Total Cover
20% of total cover �
5 Yes FAC
5 = Total Cover
50% of total cover 2 5 20% of total cover �
Remarks (If observed, list morphological adaptations below)
Loblolly pine plantation
Hydrophytic
VegetaUon
Present? Yes X No
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plam Region — Version 2 0

SOIL Sampling Point B-3
ProFle Description (Descnbe to the depth needed to document the mdicator or confirm the absence of indlcators )
Depth Matnx Redox Features
Gnches) Color (moisU % Color (moist) % Tvae Loc Texture Remarks
0-3 10YR 3/2 100 loam
3-5 10YR 4/1 � �� sandy day loam 50/50 organic coating salUpepper appearence
5-12 10YR 4/3 � �� sandy uay ioam 50/50 organic coating sa�Upepper appearance
'T e C=Concentration, D=De letion, RM=Reduced Matnx, MS=Masked Sand Grains zLocation PL=Pore Linin , M=Matnx
Hydr�c Sod Ind�cators (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherw�se noted � Indicators for Problematic Hydric Sods'
� Histosol (A1) � Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U) �❑-1 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
�Histic Epipedon (A2) � Thin Dark Surtace (S9) (LRR S, T, U) IJ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
Black Histic (A3) Loamy Mucky Mmeral (F1) (LRR O) � Reduced Vertic (F18) (outs�de MLRA 150A,B)
,Q Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) � Loamy Gleyed Matnx (F2) �TI Piedmont Floodplain Sods (F19) (LRR P, S, �
�Stratified Layers (A5) Depleted Matnx (F3) u Anomalous Bnght Loamy Sods (F20)
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U) � Redox Dark Surtace (F6) (MLRA 1536)
�5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U) � Depleted Dark Surtace (F7) T❑�1 Red Parent Matenal (TF2)
Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U) Redox Depressions (F8) u Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
D 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, � � Marl (F10) (LRR U) � Other (Explain in Remarks)
D Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) � Depleted Ochnc (F11) (MLRA 151)
D Thick Dark Surface (Al2) D Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, 'n 'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
� Coast Prame Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A) � Umbnc SurFace (F13) (LRR P, T, U) wetland hydrology must be present,
D Sandy Mucky Mmeral (S1) (LRR 0, S) � Delta Ochnc (F17) (MLRA 151) unless disturbed or problematic
II Sandy Gleyed Matnx (S4) � Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 7506)
D Sandy Redox (S5) � Piedmont Floodplain Sods (F19) (MLRA 149A)
� Stnpped Matrix (S6) Anomalous Bnght Loamy Sods (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
D Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restr�ctrve Layer (if observed)
Type
Depth (inches) Hydnc So�l Present? Yes No X
Remarks
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plam Region — Version 2 0

�
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Guif Coastal Plain Region
Pro�ecUS�te Line 43 Replacement C�tylCounty GreenvdlelPitt Samphng Date 10/10/2013
ApplicanUOwner PiedmOnt Natural Gas State NC Sampling Point B"�
Investigator(s) Charles Benton - URS Corp Section, Township, Range
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc ) flat Local relief (concave, convex, none) none Slope (%) 0-1
Subregion (LRR or MLRA) LRR-P Lat 35 578435 Long -�7 452019 Datum NAD-83
So�l Map Un�t Name Rains fine sandy loam (Ra) NWI classification
Are climatic 1 hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year� Yes No (If no, explain in Remarks )
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed� Np Are "Normal Circumstances" present� Yes X No _
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic� No (If needed, explam any answers m Remarks )
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach s�te map showmg sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present� Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Hydnc Soil Present� Yes No X within a Wetland? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present� Yes No X —
Upland woods south of Frog Level Road near pipeline route and temporary work space
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators Secondarv Indicators (minimum of two reauired)
Pnmarv Indicators (minimum of one is reauired. check all that aaalvl ❑ Surtace Sod Cracks (B6)
�Surface Water (A1) ❑ Aquatic Fauna (B13) ❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (BS)
High Water Table (A2) Q1--f Marl Deposits (615) (LRR U) ❑ Drainage Pattems (610)
� Saturation (A3) 1U�f Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) � Moss Tnm Lines (B16)
� Water Marks (61) LJ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) � Dry-Season Water Table (C2)
�Sediment Deposits (62) �I--� Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Cra�sh Burrows (C8)
Dnft Deposits (83) I--J Recent Iron Reduction in Tdled Sods (C6) II Saturation Visible on Aenal Imagery (C9)
a Algal Mat or Crust (B4) ❑ Thin Muck SurFace (C7) II Geomorphic Position (D2)
Q, Iron Deposits (65) � Other (Explain in Remarks) II Shallow Aqwtard (D3)
a Inundation Visible on Aenal Imagery (67) ❑ FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
a Water-Stained Leaves (B9) II Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Fieid Observations
Surtace Water Present� Yes No Depth (inches)
Water Table Present� Yes No Depth (inches)
Saturation Present� Yes No Depth (mches) Wetland Hydrology Present� Yes No x
includes ca illa fnn e
Descnbe Recorded Data (stream gauge, morntonng well, aenal photos, previous inspections), if available
Remarks
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region – Version 2 0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) — Use scientific names of plants Sampling Point B-�
Absolute Dominant Indicator pommance Test worksheet
Tree Stratum (Plot size 30 feet � % Cover Soeaes� Status Number of Dominant Species
� Pinus taeda - loblolly pine 100 Yes FAC That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC 4
2 Total Number of Dominant
3 Species Across All Strata 4
4
Percent of Dominant Species
5 That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC 100
6
� Prevalence Index worksheet
8 Total % Cover of Multiolv bv
50% of total cover 50
Saplina/Shrub Stratum (Plot size 30 feet �
� Persea borbonia - red bay
Z Ilex opaca - Amencan holly
3
4
5
6
7
8
50% of total cover 5
Herb Stratum (Plot size 30 feet �
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
50% of total cover
Woodv Vine Stratum (Plot size 30 feet �
� Smdax rotundifolia
2
3
4
5
50% of total cover 2 5
100 = Total Cover
20% of total cover 20
5 Yes FACW
5 Yes FAC
10 = Total Cover
20% of total cover �
= Total Cover
20% of total cover
5 Yes FAC
5 = Total Cover
20% of total cover �
Remarks (If observed, list morphological adaptations below)
Loblolly pine plantation, with sparse understory
(A)
ig)
��B)
OBL species x 1 =
FACW species x 2 =
FAC species x 3 =
FACU species x 4 =
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals (A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators
❑ 1- Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
�✓ , 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
❑ 3- Prevalence Index is s3 0'
a Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric sod and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic
Defnitions of Four Vegetation Strata
Tree — Woody plants, excluding wnes, 3 in (7 6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height
Saplmg/Shrub — Woody plants, excluding wnes, less
than 3 in DBH and greater than 3 28 ft(1 m) tall
Herb — All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3 28 ft tall
Woody vine — All woody vines greater than 3 28 ft m
height
Hydrophytic
VegeWtion
Present� Yes X No
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2 0

SOIL Samplmg Point B"4
Profile Description (Describe to the depth needed to document the mdicator or confirm the absence of mdicators )
Depth Matrix Redox Features
Smches) Color (moist) % Color (moistl % Tvpe Loc Texture Remarks
0-3 10YR 3/2 100 loam
3-5 10YR 4/1 � �� sandy c�ay ioam 50/50 organic coatmg salUpepper appearance
5-12 lOYR 6/4 100 sandy clay loam
'T e C=Concentration, D=De letion, RM=Reduced Matnx, MS=Masked Sand Grains ZLocation PL=Pore Linin , M=Matnx
Hydric Soll Indicators (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted ) Indicators for Problematic Hydnc Soils'
� Histosol (A1) � Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U) ❑ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
�Histic Epipedon (A2) Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U) � 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
Black Histic (A3) � Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O) �--I Reduced Vertic (F18) (outslde MLRA 150A,8)
� Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) ,Q Loamy Gleyed Matnx (F2) �1u--I Piedmont Floodplain Sods (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
�Stratified Layers (A5) Depleted Matrix (F3) u Anomalous Bnght Loamy Sods (F20)
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U) � Redox Dark SurFace (F6) (MLRA 153B)
� 5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U) � Depleted Dark Surface (F7) T❑-I Red Parent Matenal (TF2)
� Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U) Redox Depressions (F8) u Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
D 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, '� � Marl (F10) (LRR U) � Other (Explain m Remarks)
D Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) � Depleted Ochnc (F11) (MLRA 151)
� Thick Dark Surface (Al2) � Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, � 'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
II Coast Praine Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A) � Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U) wetland hydrology must be present,
� Sandy Mucky Mmeral (S1) (LRR O, S) � Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151) unless disturbed or problematic
D Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) � Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 150B)
� Sandy Redox (S5) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
D Stnpped Matnx (S6) Anomalous Bright Loamy Sods (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
D Dark Surtace (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictrve Layer (if observed)
Type
Depth (inches) Hydnc Soil Present? Yes No X
Remarks
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2 0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Pro�ecUS�te Lme 43 Replacement C�ty/County Greenvdie/Pitt Samplmg Date � 0/10/2013
ApplicanUOwner Piedmont Natural Gas State NC Sampling Point B-5
Investigator(s) Charles Benton - URS Corp Sechon, Township, Range
Landform (hdislope, terrace, etc ) flat Local relief (concave, convex, none) nOne Slope (%) 0-1
Subregion (LRR or MLRA) LRR-P Lat 35 588445 Long -77 451436 Datum NAD-83
Soil Map Unit Name Ralns fine Sandy IOam (Ra) NWI classification
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year� Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks )
Are Vegetation , Sod , or Hydrology significantly disturbed� Np Are "Normal Circumstances" present� Yes X No
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic� No (If needed, explain any answers m Remarks )
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present� Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Hydnc Sod Present� Yes No X withm a Wetland? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present� Yes No X —
Remarks
Upland woods north of Frog Level Road near utility line easement and ditch
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators Secondarv Indicators (mmimum of two reawred)
Primarv Indicators (mmimum of one is reqwred, check all that aoolvl ❑ Surface Sod Cracks (B6)
❑ Surface Water (A1) r❑� Aquatic Fauna (813) ❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surtace (B8)
Q High Water Table (A2) 1�--1f Marl Deposits (615) (LRR U) ❑ Drainage Patterns (B10)
� Saturation (A3) �I---If Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) � Moss Tnm Lines (616)
� Water Marks (61) �L-7J Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) II Dry-Season Water Table (C2)
�Sediment Deposits (82) TL�Jf Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) 0 Cra�sh Burrows (CS)
Drift Deposits (B3) LJ Recent Iron Reduction in Tdled Sods (C6) ❑ Saturation Visible on Aenal Imagery (C9)
a Algal Mat or Crust (64) ❑ Thin Muck Surface (C7) ❑ Geomorphic Position (D2)
a Iron Deposits (B5) � Other (Explain in Remarks) II Shallow Aquitard (D3)
a Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (67) � FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
❑ Water-Stained Leaves (B9) � Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
F�eld Observations
Surtace Water Present� Yes No X Depth (inches)
Water Table Present� Yes No X Depth (mches)
Saturation Present? Yes No X Depth (inches) Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
mcludes ca dla fnn e
Descnbe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitonng well, aenal photos, prewous inspections), if avadable
Remarks
shallow ditching within plantation rows
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region – Version 2 0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) — Use scientific names of plants Samplmg Pomt B-5
Absolute Dominant Indicator pom�nance Test worksheet
Tree Stratum (Plot size 30 feet � % Cover Species� Status Number of Dommant Speaes
� Pinus taeda - loblolly pine 100 Yes FAC That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC 4
2 Total Number of Dommant
3 Species Across All Strata 4
4 Percent of Dommant Species
5 That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC 100
s
Prevalencelndex worksheet
7
Total % Cover of Multiolv bv
8
= Total Cover OBL speaes x 1=
50% of total cover 20% of total cover FACW species x 2=
Saplina/Shrub Stratum (Plot size 30 feet � FAC species x 3=
� Ilex glabra - mkberry 10 Yes FACW FACU species x 4=
2 UPL species x 5=
Column Totals (A)
3
4 Prevalence Index = B/A =
5 _
6 _
7 _
8 - —
50% of total cover 5
Herb Stratum (Plot size 30 feet �
� Arundinana gigantea - giant cane
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
50% of total cover 5
Woodv Vine Stratum (Plot size 30 feet �
� Smdax rotundifolia - bner
2
3
4
5
50% of total cover 5
Remarks (If observed, list morphological adaptation�
Soil boring in loblolly pine plantation
10 = Total Cover
20% of total cover 2
10 Yes FACW
� � = Total Cover
20°/a of total cover 2
10 Yes FAC
10 = Total Cover
20% of total cover 2
(A)
ig)
i�B)
❑ 1- Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
II✓ 2- Dominance Test is >50%
a 3- Prevalence Index is <_3 0'
a Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
�B)
'Indicators of hydnc sod and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vmes, 3 m(7 6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excludmg vines, less
than 3 in DBH and greater than 3 28 ft(1 m) tall
Herb-All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3 28 ft tall
Woody v�ne - All woody vines greater than 3 28 ft in
height
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present7 Yes X No
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2 0

SOIL Sampling Pomt 6=5
Profile Description (Describe to the depth needed to document the ind�cator or confirm the absence of indicators )
Depth Matnx Redox Features
(inchesl Color (moisU % Color (moist) % Tvoe Loc Texture Remarks
�-3 10YR 2/1 � �� Sandy 108R1 50/50 organic coating salVpepper appearance
3-5 10YR 4/4 100 sandy loam
5-12 10YR 7/4 90 10YR 7/8 10 D M sandy loam
'T e C=Concentration, D=De letion, RM=Reduced Matnx, MS=Masked Sand Grains ZLocation PL=Pore Linin , M=Matnx
Hydr�c Sod Indicators (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted ) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Sods'
� Histosol (A1) � Polyvalue Below SurFace (S8) (LRR S, T, U) T❑� 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
j1 Histic Epipedon (A2) � Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U) u 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
�� Black Histic (A3) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O) _-❑I--I Reduced Vertic (F18) (outslde MLRA 150A,B)
� Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) � Loamy Gleyed Matnx (F2) Tu�I Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, �
�Stratified Layers (A5) Depleted Matnx (F3) u Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
Orgarnc Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U) � Redox Dark Surface (F6) (MLRA 1536)
� 5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U) � Depleted Dark Surface (F7) T❑�I Red Parent Matenal (TF2)
D Muck Presence (AS) (LRR U) Redox Depressions (F8) u Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
D 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T) Q Marl (F10) (LRR U) � Other (Explain m Remarks)
D Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) � Depleted Ochnc (F11) (MLRA 151)
� Thick Dark SurFace (Al2) � Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, � 'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
� Coast Praine Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A) � Umbric Surtace (F13) (LRR P, T, U) wetland hydrology must be present,
II Sandy Mucky Mmeral (S1) (LRR O, S) � Delta Ochnc (F17) (MLRA 157) unless disturbed or problematic
II Sandy Gleyed Matnx (S4) � Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 1506)
II Sandy Redox (S5) � Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
II Stnpped Matrix (S6) Anomalous Bnght Loamy Sotls (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
D Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrict�ve Layer (if observed)
Type
Depth (inches) Hydric So�l Present? Yes No X
Remarks
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2 0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Pro�ectlSite Line 43 Repiacement C�ty/Counry Greenville/Pitt Sampl�ng Date � 0/10/2013
ApplicanUOwner PiedmOnt Natural Gas State NC Sampling Pomt B-6
Investigator(s) Charles Benton - URS Corp Section Township, Range
Landform (hdlslope, terrace, etc ) flat Local relief (concave, convex, none) none Slope (%) 0-1
Subregion (LRR or MLRA) LRR-P Lat 35 594499 Long -�� 448448 Datum NAD-83
Soil Map Unit Name RalnS fine Sandy loam (Ra) NWI classification
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year� Yes X No (If no, explam m Remarks )
Are Vegetation , Sod , or Hydrology sigrnficantly disturbed� Np Are "Normal Circumstances° present� Yes X No
Are Vegetation , Sod , or Hydrology naturally problematic� No (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks )
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present� Yes X No
Is the Sampled Area
Hydnc Sod Present� Yes No X withm a Wetland? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present� Yes No X —
Remarks
Upiand woods south of Stantonsburg Road
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators Secondarv Indicators (mmimum of two reauiredl
Pnmarv Indicators (mirnmum of one is reauired, check all that aoolv) II Surtace Sod Cracks (66)
❑ Surface Water (A1) ❑ Aquatic Fauna (B13) ❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surtace (68)
Q High Water Table (A2) Q1--� Marl Deposits (B15) (LRR U) ❑ Drainage Patterns (610)
� Saturation (A3) 1I---fI Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) g Moss Tnm Lmes (B16)
� Water Marks (61) LJ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) � Dry-Season Water Table (C2)
❑ Sediment Deposits (B2) Q1--f Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Crayfish Burrows (C8)
� Dnft Deposits (B3) I--� Recent Iron Reduction in Tdled Soils (C6) II Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
a Algal Mat or Crust (B4) ❑ Thin Muck Surtace (C7) II Geomorphic Position (D2)
Q, Iron Deposits (B5) � Other (Explain m Remarks) II Shallow Aqwtard (D3)
a Inundation Visible on Aenal Imagery (B7) II FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
a Water-Stained Leaves (B9) ❑ Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations
SurFace Water Present� Yes No X Depth (inches)
Water Table Present� Yes No X Depth (inches)
Saturation Present� Yes No X Depth (inches) Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
mcludes ca dla frin e
Descnbe Recorded Data (stream gauge, morntonng well, aenal photos, previous inspections), if available
Remarks
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2 0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) — Use scientific names of plants Sampling Pomt B-�
Absolute Dominant Indicator pominance Test worksheet
Tree Stratum (Plot size 30 feet � % Cover Soeaes? Status Number of Dominant Species
� Pinus taeda - loblolly pine 95 Yes FAC That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC 5
2 Quercus nigra - water oak 5 No FAC
Total Number of Dominant
3 Species Across All Strata 4
4
Percent of Dominant Speaes
5 That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC $�
6
� Prevalence Index worksheet
8 Total % Cover of Multiqlv bv
100 = Total Cover
50% of total cover 50 20% of total cover 20
Saplinq/Shrub Stratum (Plot size 30 feet �
� Morella cenfera - wax myrtle 5
2 Lyonia luada - fetterbush 5
3 _
4
5 _
6 _
7 _
8 _
50% of total cover 5
Herb Stratum (Plot size 30 feet �
� Arundinana gigantea - giant cane
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
50% of total cover 2 5
Woodv Vine Stratum (Plot size 30 feet �
1
2
3
4
5
50% of total cover _
Remarks (If observed, list morphological adaptations
Young growth pine piantation
Yes FAC
Yes FACW
�� = Total Cover
20% of total cover Z
5
(A)
�B)
(f'✓B)
OBL species x 1 =
FACW species x 2 =
FAC species x 3 =
FACU speaes x 4 =
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals (A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
❑ 1- Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
�✓� 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
❑ 3- Prevalence Index is s3 0'
a Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explam)
'Indicators of hydnc soil and wetland hydrology must
Yes FACW be present, unless disturbed or problematic
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata
Tree — Woody plants, excluding vmes, 3 in (7 6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height
Saplmg/Shrub — Woody plants, excluding vmes, less
than 3 m DBH and greater than 3 28 ft(1 m) tall
Herb — All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3 28 ft tall
Woody vine — All woody vmes greater than 3 28 ft in
height
5 = Total Cover
20% of total cover �
Hydrophytic
= Total Cover Vegetation
20% of total cover Present? Yes X No
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plam Region — Version 2 0

SOIL Sampling Pomt B'S
Profde Descriptlon (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of md�cators )
Depth Matnx Redox Features
(inchesl Color (moisU % Color (moist) % Tvpe Loc Texture Remarks
�-3 10YR 2/1 � �� sandy loam 50/50 organic coating salUpepper appearance
3-5 10YR 4/4 100 sandy Gay loam
5-12 10YR 7/4 97 7 5YR 5/6 3 C M sandy clay loam
'T e C=Concentration, D=De letion, RM=Reduced Matnx, MS=Masked Sand Gra�ns ZLocation PL=Pore Lmin , M=Matnx
Hydric Sod Indicators (Appl�cable to all LRRs, unless othervvise noted ) Indicators for Problemat�c Hydric Soils'
� Histosol (A1) � Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U) T❑I 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
�Histic Epipedon (A2) � Thm Dark Surtace (S9) (LRR S, T, U) �u--I 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
Black Histic (A3) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O) �u--I Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
� Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) � Loamy Gleyed Matnx (F2) u Piedmont Floodplain Sods (F19) (LRR P, S, �
�Stratified Layers (A5) Depleted Matnx (F3) � Anomalous Bright Loamy Sods (F20)
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U) � Redox Dark Surface (F6) (MLRA 153B)
D 5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U) � Depleted Dark Surface (F7) ❑ Red Parent Matenal (TF2)
D Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U) Redox Depressions (FS) � Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
D 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, '� � Marl (F10) (LRR U) � Other (Explain m Remarks)
D Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) � Depleted Ochnc (F11) (MLRA 151)
D Thick Dark Surtace (Al2) � Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, 'n 'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
� Coast Praine Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A) � Umbnc Surtace (F13) (LRR P, T, U) wetland hydrology must be present,
D Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S) � Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151) unless disturbed or problematic
D Sandy Gleyed Matnx (S4) � Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 150B)
D Sandy Redox (S5) Piedmont Floodplam Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
n Stnpped Matnx (S6) Anomalous Bnght Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
D Dark Surtace (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed)
Type
Depth (inches) Hydric So�l Present? Yes No X
Remarks
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2 0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Piain Region
Pro�ecuS�te Lme 43 Replacement C�ty/County Greenvdle/Pitt Sampl�ng Date 11/19/2013
appl�canUOwner Piedmont Natural Gas State N� Sampling Point B'� �W1-Up)
Investigator(s) Charles Benton - URS Corp Section, Township, Range
Landform (hdlslope, terrace, etc ) flat Local relief (concave, convex, none) nOne Slope (o�a� 0-1
Subregion (LRR or MLRA) LRR-P Lat 35 600098 �o�g -77 443331 Datum NAD-83
Sod Map Unit Name Lynchburg fine sandy loam (Ly) NWI classification
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year� Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks )
Are VegetaUon , Sod , or Hydrology significantly disturbed� r]o Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation , Sod , or Hydrology naturally problematic? No (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks )
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showmg sampl�ng point locations, transects, important features, etc
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present� Yes X No _
Hydric Soil Present� Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present� Yes No X
Remarks
Upland pair for Wetland W-1
HYDROLOGY
Is the Sampled Area
within a Wetland� Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Ind�cators Secondarv Indicators (minimum of two reawred)
Pnmarv Indicators (minimum of one is reawred, check all that aoolv) II Surface Sod Cracks (66)
❑ Surtace Water (A1) 1❑--� Aquatic Fauna (613) ❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
Q High Water Table (A2) 1�---1f Marl Deposits (615) (LRR U) ❑ Drainage Patterns (B10)
� Saturation (A3) I--I Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) ❑ Moss Tnm Lines (616)
� Water Marks (61) II Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) II Dry-Season Water Table (C2)
�Sediment Deposits (62) Q1�f Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) � Cra�sh Burrows (C8)
Dnft Deposits (B3) LI Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Sods (C6) ❑ Saturation Visible on Aenal Imagery (C9)
a Algal Mat or Crust (B4) ❑ Thin Muck Surface (C7) � Geomorphic Position (D2)
a Iron Deposits (65) 0 Other (Explain in Remarks) � Shallow Aqwtard (D3)
a Inundation Visible on Aenal Imagery (67) II FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
a Water-Stained Leaves (69) II Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations
Surface Water Present� Yes No X Depth (inches)
Water Table Present� Yes No X Depth (inches)
Saturation Present� Yes No X Depth (inches) Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
mdudes ca dla fnn e
Descnbe Recorded Data (stream gauge, morntonng well, aenal photos, previous inspections), if avadable
Remarks
Excavated ditch D-7 in vicinity was dry within 2 feet of the surface
US Army Corps of Engmeers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plam Region — Version 2 0

�
VEGETATION (Four Strata) — Use scientific names of plants Samplmg Pomt B-� (W�-up�
Absolute Dominant Indicator pommance Test worksheet
Tree Stratum (Plot size 30 feet � % Cover S�ecies� Status Number of Dommant Species
� Liqwdambar stryaciflua 100 Yes FAC That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC 3 (A)
2
Total Number of Dommant
3 Speaes Across All Strata 3 (B)
4
Percent of Dommant Speaes ii
5 That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC 100 �q�g� i
6
� Prevalence Index worksheet
8 Total % Cover of Multialv bv
50% of total cover 50
SaplinqlShrub Stratum (Plot size 30 feet �
� Morella cenfera - wax myrtle
2
3
4
5
6
7
8 —
50% of total cover z 5
Herb Stratum (Plot size 30 feet �
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
50% of total cover
Woodv Vine Stratum (Plot size 30 feet �
� Smilax rotundifolia - bner
2
3
4
5
100 = Total Cover
20% of total cover 20
5 Yes FAC
OBL speaes x 1 =
FACW speaes x 2 =
FAC species x 3 =
FACU species x 4 =
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals (A) (B)
Prevalencelndex = B/A =
J� 1- Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
✓� 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
❑ 3- Prevalence Index is <_3 0'
5 = Total Cover a Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
20% of total cover �
'Indicators of hydnc sod and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic
Defmitions of Four Vegetation Strata
Tree — Woody plants, excludmg vines, 3 in (7 6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height
Saplmg/Shrub — Woody plants, excluding wnes, less
than 3 in OBH and greater than 3 28 ft(1 m) tall
Herb — All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3 28 ft tall
Woody vme — All woody vines greater than 3 28 ft m
height
= Total Cover
20% of total cover
5
Hydrophyt�c
5 = Total Cover Vegetation
50% of total cover 2 5 20% of total cover � Present?
Remarks (If observed, list morphological adaptations below)
Sweetgum thicket ad�acent to Statonsburg road Sparce understory
Yes X No
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2 0

SOIL Sampling Point B"� �1-Up)
Profde Description (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators )
Depth Matnx Redox Features
(mchesl Color (moisU % Color (moisU % Tvae Loc Texture Remarks
�-4 10YR 4/2 sandy loam 50/50 orgamc coating salUpepper appearance
4-12 10YR 6/6 95 10YR 5!8 5 C M sandy loam
'T e C=Concentration, D=De letion, RM=Reduced Matnx, MS=Masked Sand Grains ZLocation PL=Pore Lirnn , M=Matnx
Hydnc Sod Ind�cators (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted ) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Sods'
� Histosol (A1) � Polyvalue Below Surtace (S8) (LRR S, T, U) T❑ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
�Histic Epipedon (A2) Q Thm Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U) TL-JI 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
Black Histic (A3) � Loamy Mucky Mmeral (F1) (LRR O) Tu1 Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
� Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) � Loamy Gleyed Matnx (F2) Tu-t Piedmont Floodplain Sods (F19) (LRR P, S, �
�Stratified Layers (A5) Depleted Matnx (F3) L.I Anomalous Bright Loamy Sods (F20)
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U) � Redox Dark Surtace (F6) (MLRA 153B)
� 5 cm Mucky Mmeral (A7) (LRR P, T, U) � Depleted Dark Surface (F7) �❑--I Red Parent Matenal (TF2)
II Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U) Redox Depressions (F8) u Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
D 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, � � Marl (F10) (LRR U) � Other (Explain in Remarks)
D Depleted Below Dark SurFace (A11) � Depleted Ochnc (F11) (MLRA 151)
� Thick Dark Surtace (Al2) � Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, � 'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
�Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A) � Umbnc Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U) wetland hydrology must be present,
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S) � Delta Ochnc (F17) (MLRA 151) unless disturbed or problematic
Q Sandy Gleyed Matnx (S4) � Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 150B)
�Sandy Redox (S5) � Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
Stnpped Matnx (S6) Anomalous Bnght Loamy Sods (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
D Dark Surtace (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictrve Layer (if observed)
Type
Depth (inches) Hydric Sod Present? Yes No X
Remarks
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2 0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Pro�ecUSite Line 43 Replacement City/County Greenville/Pitt Samplmg Date 11l19/2013
ApplicanUOwner P�edmont Natural Gas State NC Sampling Point B-$ (W1-Wet)
Investigator(s) Charles Benton - URS Corp Section, Township, Range
Landform (hdislope, terrace, etc ) flat Local relief (concave, convex, none) non2 Slope (o�a� 0-1
Subregion (LRR or MLRA) LRR-P Lat 35 600904 Long '�� 44291 � Datum NAD-83
Soil Map Unit Name Rains fine sandy loam (Ra) Nwl class�fication PFO
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year� Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks )
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology sigrnficantly disturbed� jvo Are "Normal Circumstances" present� Yes X No
Are Vegetation , Sod , or Hydrology naturally problematic� No (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks )
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present� Yes X No
Is the Sampled Area
Hydnc Sod Present� Yes X No W�thm a Wetland7 Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present� Yes X No
Remarks
Documentation for Wetland W-1 located north of Stantonsburg Road
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators Secondarv Indicators (minimum of two reauired)
Primarv Indicators (mmimum of one is reauired. check all that apqlv) II SurFace Soil Cracks (B6)
�❑ Surface Water (A1) ❑ Aquatic Fauna (B13) ❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surtace (B8)
Q� High Water Table (A2) Q1--� Marl Deposits (815) (LRR U) � Drainage Patterns (B10)
LI Saturation (A3) 1L-J-f Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) g Moss Tnm Lines (616)
❑ Water Marks (61) L-I Oxidized Rhizospheres along Liwng Roots (C3) � Dry-Season Water Table (C2)
� Sediment Deposits (62) Q Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Cra�sh Burrows (C8)
� Dnft Deposits (B3) II Recent Iron Reduction in Tdled Sods (C6) � Saturation Visible on Aenal Imagery (C9)
a Algal Mat or Crust (B4) � Thin Muck Surface (C7) ❑ Geomorphic Position (D2)
Q, Iron Deposits (85) � Other (Explain m Remarks) j] Shallow Aqwtard (D3)
a Inundation Visible on Aenal Imagery (67) II FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
a Water-Stained Leaves (B9) II Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations
Surface Water Present� Yes No X Depth (inches)
Water Table Present� Yes X No Depth (inches) 0
Saturation Present� Yes X No Depth (inches) 4 Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
mcludes ca illa fnn e
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, morntonng well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if avadable
Remarks
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2 0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) — Use scientific names of plants
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size 30 feet � % Cover S�ecies� Status
� Liquidambar stryaaflua - sweetgum 50 Yes FAC
2 Persea borbonia 5 No FACW
3 Pinus taeda 10 No FAC
4 Quercus nigra 5 No FAC
5 Acer rubrum 30 Yes FAC
6
7
8
50°/a of total cover 50
Saplinq/Shrub Stratum (Plot size 30 feet �
� Ilex opaca - Amencan holly
2 Lyonia luada - fetterbush
3 Vacanium corymbosum - highbush blueberry
q Ilex verticillata - winterberry
5
6
7
8
100 = Total Cover
20% of total cover 20
5 No FAC
20 Yes FACW
10 Yes FACW
5 No FACW
40
50% of total cover 20
Herb Stratum (Plot size 30 feet �
� Osmundastrum annamomeum - annamon fern 5
2 Onoclea sensibdis - sensitive fern 5
3 Arundinana gigantea - giant cane 10
4 Sphagnum sp - sphagnum moss Q
5 _
6 _
7 _
8 _
9 _
10 _
11 _
12
50% of total cover 10
Woodv Vine Stratum (Plot size 30 feet �
� Smilax rotundifolia
2
3
4
5
= Total Cover
20% of total cover $
Yes FACW
Yes FACW
Yes FACW
N/A
Z� = Total Cover
20% of total cover 4
10 Yes FAC
10 = Total Cover
50% of total cover 5 20% of total cover 2
Remarks (If observed, list morphological adaptations below)
Wetland extends north outside of pro�ect study area
Sampling Pomt B'8 �w'��
Number of Dommant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC $
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata
Percent of Dommant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC
8
100
(A)
�B)
��B)
Prevalencelndex worksheet
Total % Cover of Multiolv bv
OBL species x 1 =
FACW speaes x 2 =
FAC species x 3 =
FACU species x 4 =
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals (A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
�j 1- Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
✓� 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
❑ 3- Prevalence Index is 53 0'
a Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric sod and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic
Definitions of Four Veaetation Strata
Tree — Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in (7 6 cm) or
more m diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height
Sapling/Shrub — Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in DBH and greater than 3 28 ft(1 m) tall
Herb — All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3 28 ft tall
Woody vine — All woody vines greater than 3 28 ft in
height
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes X No
US Army Corps of Engmeers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2 0

SOIL Samplmg Point B-8 �W-��
Profde Description (Describe to the depth needed to document the mdicator or confirm the absence of indicators )
Depth Matnx Redox Features
Sinches) Color (moisU % Color (moisU % Tvpe Loc Texture Remarks
0-8 10YR 4/1 100 sandy loam >70% orgamc coatmg
8-12 10YR 6/2 95 10YR 5/6 5 C M sandy loam
'T e C=Concentration, D=De letion, RM=Reduced Matnx, MS=Masked Sand Grains ZLocation PL=Pore Lmin , M=Matnx
Hydric Sod Ind�cators (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted ) Indicators for Problematic Hydnc Soils'
� Histosol (A1) � Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U) T❑-I 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
�Histic Epipedon (A2) � Thm Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U) � 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
Black Histic (A3) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O) Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
� Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) � Loamy Gleyed Matnx (F2) �-1-� Piedmont Floodplain Sods (F19) (LRR P, S, �
�Stratified Layers (A5) Depleted Matnx (F3) u Anomalous Bnght Loamy Soils (F20)
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U) � Redox Dark Surtace (F6) (MLRA 153B)
�5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) T❑�I Red Parent Material (TF2)
Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U) � Redox Depressions (F8) u Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
II 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, � � Marl (F10) (LRR U) � Other (Explain in Remarks)
D Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) � Depleted Ochnc (F11) (MLRA 151)
� Thick Dark Surface (Al2) � Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, 'n 'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
� Coast Prame Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A) � Umbric Surtace (F13) (LRR P, T, U) wetland hydrology must be present,
� Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S) � Delta Ochnc (F17) (MLRA 151) unless disturbed or problematic
D Sandy Gleyed Matnx (S4) ,Q Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 1506)
D Sandy Redox (S5) � Piedmont Floodplain Sods (F19) (MLRA 149A)
� Stripped Matnx (S6) Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
D✓ Dark SurFace (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restnctrve Layer (if observed)
Type
Depth (inches) Hydnc Soil Present� Yes X No
Remarks
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2 0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Pro�ecUSite Line 43 Replacement City/County Greenwlle/Pitt Sampling Date 11/19/2013
ApplicanUOwner P�edmont Natural Gas State NC Sampling Point B-9
Investigator(s) Charles Benton - URS Corp Section, Township, Range
Landform (hdlslope, terrace, etc ) flat Local relief (concave, convex, none) nOne Slope (o�o� 0-1
Subregion (LRR or MLRA) LRR-P Lat 35 601687 Long -�� 438636 Datum NAD-83
Sod Map Urnt Name Ralns fine Sandy loam (Ra) NWI classification
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year'� Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks )
Are Vegetation , Sod , or Hydrology signiflcantly disturbed� Np Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No _
Are Vegetation , Sod , or Hydrology naturally problemat�c� No (If needed, explam any answers m Remarks )
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present� Yes X No
Is the Sampled Area
Hydnc Sod Present� Yes No x within a WetlandT Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present� Yes No X —
Upiand woods north of Stantonsburg Road and ad�acent to an agricultural field
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators Secondarv Indicators (minimum of two reawredl
Pnmarv Indicators (minimum of one is reawred, check all that aoolv) II Surtace Sod Cracks (B6)
❑ Surface Water (A1) ❑ Aquatic Fauna (613) ❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (68)
Qp� High Water Table (A2) Q1--f Marl Deposits (B15) (LRR U) ❑ Drainage Pattems (610)
LJ Saturation (A3) 1I-J-f Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) g Moss Trim Lines (B16)
� Water Marks (B1) l-J Oxidized Rhizospheres along Livmg Roots (C3) ❑ Dry-Season Water Table (C2)
�, Sediment Deposits (B2) �1�f Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) ❑ Cra�sh Burrows (C8)
❑ Dnft Deposits (B3) LJ Recent Iron Reduction m Tilled Soils (C6) II Saturation Visible on Aenal Imagery (C9)
a Algal Mat or Crust (B4) ❑ Thm Muck Surface (C7) II Geomorphic Position (D2)
a Iron Deposits (B5) 0 Other (Explain in Remarks) ❑ Shallow Aqwtard (D3)
a Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (67) � FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
a Water-Stamed Leaves (B9) � Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations
Surface Water Present� Yes No X Depth (mches)
Water Table Present� Yes No X Depth (mches)
Saturation Present� Yes No x Depth (mches) Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
includes ca dla fnn e
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitonng well, aenal photos, prewous mspections), if avadable
Remarks
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plam Region - Version 2 0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) — Use scientific names of plants
Absolute Dommant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size 30 feet � % Cover Soecies� Status
� Pinus taeda - loblolly pme 100 Yes FAC
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
50% of total cover 50
Saplinq/Shrub Stratum (Plot size 30 feet �
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
50% of total cover
Herb Stratum (Plot size 30 feet �
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
50% of total cover
Woodv Vme Stratum (Plot size 30 feet �
� smdax rotundifolia
2
3
4
5
100 = Total Cover
20% of total cover 20
= Total Cover
20°/a of total cover
= Total Cover
20% of total cover
10 Yes FAC
10 = Total Cover
50% of total cover 5 20% of total cover �
Remarks (If observed, list morphological adaptations below)
Dense loblolly stand with sparse understory
Samplmg Point B-9
Dommance Test worksheet
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC 2 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata 2 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC 100 �,q�g�
Prevalence Index worksheet
Total °/a Cover of Multi�lv bv
OBL species x 1 =
FACW species x 2 =
FAC species x 3 =
FACU species x 4 =
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals (A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indlcators
❑ 1- Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
❑✓ 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
II 3- Prevalence Index is 53 0'
II Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explam)
'Indicators of hydnc soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic
Definit�ons of Four Veqetation Strata
Tree — Woody plants, excluding vmes, 3 in (7 6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height
Sapling/Shrub — Woody plants, excluding wnes, less
than 3 m DBH and greater than 3 28 ft(1 m) tall
Herb — All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3 28 ft tall
Woody vine — All woody vines greater than 3 28 ft in
height
Hydrophytic
Vegetat�on
PresentT Yes X No
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2 0

SOIL Sampling Point B-9
Profile Description (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators )
Depth Matnx Redox Features
(mches) Color (moisU % Color (moisfl % Tvae Loc Texture Remarks
�-3 10YR 3/2 � �� 50/50 organic coat�ng salVpepper appearance
3-12 10YR 6/4 100
'T e C=Concentration, D=De letion, RM=Reduced Matnx, MS=Masked Sand Grams ZLocation PL=Pore Lirnn , M=Matrix
Hydric Sod Indicators (Appl�cable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted ) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils'
� Histosol (A1) � Polyvalue Below SurFace (S8) (LRR S, T, U) ❑ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
�Histic Epipedon (A2) � Thm Dark Surtace (S9) (LRR S, T, U) � 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
Black Histic (A3) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O) � Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,8)
,Q Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) � Loamy Gleyed Matnx (F2) �T-1 Piedmont Floodplain Sods (F19) (LRR P, S, �
�Stratified Layers (A5) Depleted Matnx (F3) u Anomalous Bnght Loamy Soils (F20)
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U) � Redox Dark Surface (F6) (MLRA 1536)
� 5 cm Mucky Mmeral (A7) (LRR P, T, U) � Depleted Dark Surface (F7) ❑ Red Parent Matenal (TF2)
II Muck Presence (AS) (LRR U) Redox Depressions (F8) -❑ Very Shallow Dark Surtace (TF12)
II 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, 7) � Marl (F10) (LRR U) � Other (Explam in Remarks)
D Depleted Below Dark Surtace (A11) � Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
D Thick Dark Surface (Al2) � Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, � 'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
� Coast Praine Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A) � Umbnc Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U) wetland hydrology must be present,
D Sandy Mucky Mmeral (S1) (LRR O, S) � Delta Ochnc (F17) (MLRA 151) unless disturbed or problematic
D Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) � Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 150B)
�Sandy Redox (S5) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
Stripped Matnx (S6) Anomalous Bnght Loamy Sods (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
II Dark Surtace (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restnctrve Layer (if observed)
Type
Depth (inches) Hydric Soii Present? Yes No X
Remarks
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2 0

WETLAND DETERMtNATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Pro�ecUSite Line 43 Replacement City/County Greenvdle/Pitt Sampling Date 10/22/2013
Applicant/Owner Piedmont Natural Gas State NC Sampling Point B'10
Investigator(s) Charles Benton - URS Corp Section, Township, Range
Landform (hilislope, terrace, etc ) flat Local relief (concave, convex, none) norle Slope (%) �-�
Subregion (LRR or MLRA) LRR-P Lat '�� 435431 Long 35 608748 Datum NAD-83
Sod Map Unit Name Rams fine sandy loam (Ra) NWI classification
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year� Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks )
Are Vegetation , Sod , or Hydrology sigrnficantly disturbed� Np Are "Normal Circumstances" present� Yes X No _
Are Vegetation , Sod , or Hydrology naturally problematic� No (If needed, explain any answers m Remarks )
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showmg sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present�
Hydnc Sod Present�
Wetland Hydrology Present�
Near US 264 interchange
HYDROLOGY
Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Yes No X withm a Wetland� Yes No X
Yes No X —
Wetland Hydrology Indicators Secondarv Indicators (minimum of two reauiredl
Pnmarv Indicators (minimum of one is reawred, check all that applv) II Surtace Sod Cracks (66)
❑ Surface Water (A1) ❑ Aquatic Fauna (B13) ❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
Q High Water Table (A2) Q1--f Marl Deposits (615) (LRR U) ❑ Drainage Patterns (B10)
� Saturation (A3) �IJf Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) � Moss Trim Lines (616)
� Water Marks (61) u Oxidized Rhizospheres along Liwng Roots (C3) ❑ Dry-Season Water Table (C2)
�Sediment Deposits (62) � Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) � Cra�sh Burrows (C8)
Dnft Deposits (B3) II Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Sods (C6) ❑ Saturation Visible on Aenal imagery (C9)
a Algal Mat or Crust (B4) ❑ Thin Muck Surface (C7) II Geomorphic Position (D2)
a Iron Deposits (65) � Other (Explam in Remarks) � Shallow Aqwtard (D3)
a MundaUon Visibie on Aerial Imagery (67) � FAGNeutral Test (D5)
a Water-Stamed Leaves (B9) � Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations
Surface Water Present� Yes No X Depth (mches)
Water Table Present� Yes No X Depth (inches)
Saturation Present� Yes No X Depth (inches) Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
includes ca dla fnn e
Descnbe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available
Remarks
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plam Region – Version 2 0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) — Use saentific names of plants Sampling Point g=��
Tree Stratum (Plot size 30 feet
� Pinus taeda - loblolly pine
2 Acer rubrum - red maple
g Magnolia virginiana - magnolia
4
5
s
7
8
Absolute Dominant Indicator pominance Test worksheet
) % Cover Saeaes� Status Number of Dominant Species
40 Yes FAC That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC 5
30 Yes FAC
Total Number of Dominant
5 No FACW Speaes Across All Strata 5
Percent of Dominant Speaes
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC � 00
75 = Total Cover
50% of total cover 37 5 20% of total cover � 5
Saplinq/Shrub Stratum (Plot size 30 feet �
� Ilex opaca - Amencan holly 10
2 _
3 _
4 _
5 _
6 _
7 _
8 _
50% of total cover 5
Herb Stratum (Plot size 30 feet �
� Arundinana gigantea - giant cane
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
50% of total cover � �
Woodv Vine Stratum (Plot size 30 feet �
� smilax rotundifolia - brier
2
3
4
5
50% of total cover 5
observed, list morphological adaptations
Yes FAC
10 = Total Cover
20% of total cover 2
20
(A)
(B)
i�e)
Prevalence Index worksheet
Total % Cover of Multialv bv
OBL speaes x 1 =
FACW species x 2 =
FAC species x 3 =
FACU species x 4 =
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals (A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetat�on Indicators
❑ 1- Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
✓� 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
II 3- Prevalence Index is <_3 0'
II Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
Yes FAC be present, unless disturbed or problematic
Defnitions of Four Vegetation Strata
Tree — Woody plants, excluding vmes, 3 in (7 6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height
Sapling/Shrub — Woody plants, excluding vmes, less
than 3 in DBH and greater than 3 28 ft(1 m) tall
Herb — All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3 28 ft tall
Woody vine — All woody wnes greater than 3 28 ft in
height
20 = Total Cover
20% of total cover 4
10 Yes FAC
Hydrophytic
10 = Total Cover Vegetation
20% of total cover 2 Present� Yes X No
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2 0

SOIL Sampling Point B-10
Profile Description (Describe to the depth needed to document the �ndicator or confirm the absence of indicators )
Depth Matnx Redox Features
bnches) Color (moist) % Color (moisU % Tvoe Loc Texture Remarks
0-4 10YR 3/2 100 sandy loam
4-6 10YR 5/3 100 sandy loam
6-12 10YR 4/3 100 sandy loam
'T e C=Concentration, D=De letion, RM=Reduced Matnx, MS=Masked Sand Grains ZLocation PL=Pore Linin , M=Matnx
Hydric Sod Indicators (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted ) Indicators for Problematic Hydr�c Sods'
� Histosol (A1) � Polyvalue Below Surtace (SS) (LRR S, T, U) T❑� 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
�Histic Epipedon (A2) Thm Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U) LJ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
Black Histic (A3) � Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O) ��--I Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
� Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) D Loamy Gleyed Matnx (F2) u Piedmont Floodplain Sods (F19) (LRR P, S, '1)
�Stratified Layers (A5) Depleted Matrix (F3) � Anomalous Bnght Loamy Sods (F20)
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U) � Redox Dark Surface (F6) (MLRA 153B)
D 5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U) � Depleted Dark Surtace (F7) �❑—I Red Parent Matenal (TF2)
D Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U) Redox Depressions (F8) u Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
II 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, 7') ,� Marl (F10) (LRR U) � Other (Explain in Remarks)
D Depleted Below Dark Surtace (A11) � Depleted Ochnc (F11) (MLRA 151)
� Thick Dark Surface (Al2) � Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, � 'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Q Coast Praine Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A) � Umbnc Surtace (F13) (LRR P, T, U) wetland hydrology must be present,
D Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S) � Delta Ochnc (F17) (MLRA 151) unless disturbed or problematic
D Sandy Gleyed Matnx (S4) � Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 150B)
�Sandy Redox (S5) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
Stripped Matnx (S6) Anomalous Bnght Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
Q Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictrve Layer (if observed)
Type
Depth (mches) Hydnc Soil Present? Yes No X
Remarks '
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plam Region — Version 2 0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Pro�ect/Site Line 43 Replacement City/County Greenvdle/Pitt
ApplicanUOwner P�edmont Natural Gas State NC
Investigator(s) Charles Benton - URS Corp Section, Township, Range
Landform (hdlslope, terrace, etc ) flat Local relief (concave, convex, none) none
Subregion (LRR or MLRA) LRR-P Lat 35 610434 Long -77 432831
Sampling Date � 0/22/2013
Sampling Pomt B'11
Slope (%) 0-1
Datum NAD-83
Soil Map Unit Name Lynchburg fine sandy loam (Ly) NWI classification
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year� Yes X No (If no, explam in Remarks )
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed� ]�]p Are "Normal Circumstances" present� Yes X No
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic� No (If needed, explain any answers m Remarks )
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present� Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Hydnc Soil Present� Yes No X withm a Wetland? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present� Yes No X
Remarks
Upland woods near overhead utility easement near MacGregor powns Road near temporary
workspace at the northern end of the pro�ect study area
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators Secondarv Indicators (mmimum of two reauiredl
Pnmarv Indicators (minimum of one is reauired, check all that applv) II Surface Sod Cracks (B6)
❑ Surface Water (A1) 1❑--� Aquatic Fauna (813) ❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surtace (B8)
Q�q High Water Table (A2) 1�-J-f Marl Deposits (B15) (LRR U) ❑ Drainage Patterns (B10)
LJ Saturation (A3) LJ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) g Moss Tnm Lines (616)
� Water Marks (B1) II Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) � Dry-Season Water Table (C2)
�Sediment Deposits (62) Q Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) � Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Dnft Deposits (B3) II Recent Iron Reduction in Tdled Soils (C6) � Saturation Visible on Aenal Imagery (C9)
a Algal Mat or Crust (B4) ❑ Thin Muck SurFace (C7) II Geomorphic Position (D2)
a Iron Deposits (65) � Other (Explain m Remarks) ❑ ShallowAquitard (D3)
a Inundation Visible on Aenal Imagery (67) ❑ FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
a Water-Stained Leaves (B9) II Sphagnum moss (DS) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations
SurFace Water Present� Yes No X Depth (inches)
Water Table Present� Yes No X Depth (inches)
Saturation Present� Yes No X Depth (inches) Wetland Hydrology PresentT Yes X No
includes ca illa fnn e
Descnbe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aenal photos, prewous inspections), if available
Remarks
US Army Corps of Engmeers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2 0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) — Use scientific names of plants Sampling Point g=� �
Absolute Dominant Ind�cator pommance Test worksheet
Tree Stratum (Plot size 30 feet � % Cover Species� Status Number of Dommant Species
� Pmus taeda - loblolly pine 60 Yes FAC That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC 5
2 Acer rubrum - red maple 40 Yes FAC
Total Number of Dominant
3 Speaes Across All Strata 5
4
Percent of Dominant Species
5 That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC 100
6
Prevalence Index worksheet
7
Total % Cover of Multialv bv
8
50% of total cover Z�
Saphnq/Shrub Stratum (Plot s¢e 30 feet �
� Persea borbonia - redbay
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
50% of total cover 5
Herb Stratum (Plot size 30 feet �
1 Arundinana gigantea - giant cane
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
50% of total cover 5
Woodv Vine Stratum (Plot size 30 feet �
� Smilax rotundifolia
2
3
4
5
Remarks (If observed, list
Lobloliy pine stand
100 = Total Cover
20% of total cover 20
10 Yes FACW
�� = Total Cover
20% of total cover 2
10 Yes FACW
10 = Total Cover
20% of total cover 2
5 Yes FAC
5 = Total Cover
50% of total cover Z 5 20% of total cover �
hological adaptations below)
(A)
ig)
(%�/B)
OBL species x 1 =
FACW speaes x 2 =
FAC species x 3 =
FACU speaes x 4 =
UPL speaes x 5 =
Column Totals (A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators
II 1- Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
✓� 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
II 3- Prevalence Index is s3 0'
a Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explam)
'Indicators of hydnc soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata
Tree — Woody plants, excludmg vmes, 3 in (7 6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height
Saplmg/Shrub — Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in DBH and greater than 3 28 ft(1 m) tall
Herb—All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3 28 ft tall
Woody v�ne — All woody vmes greater than 3 28 ft in
herght
Hydrophytic
Vegetat�on
Present? Yes X No
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2 0

SOIL Sampling Pomt B=11
Profde Description (Describe to the depth needed to document the fndicator or confirm the absence of indicators )
Depth Matnx Redox Features
(inchesl Color (moist) % Color (moistl % Tvpe Loc Texture Remarks
�-6 10YR 3/2 � 0� 50l50 organic coat�ng salUpepper appearance
6-12 10YR 5/4 100
'T e C=Concentration, D=De letion, RM=Reduced Matnx, MS=Masked Sand Grains ZLocation PL=Pore Linin , M=Matrix
Hydric Sod Indicators (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherw�se noted ) Indicators for Problematic Hydnc Sods'
� Histosol (A1) � Polyvalue Below Surtace (S8) (LRR S, T, U) T❑� 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
J� Histic Epipedon (A2) � Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U) -L�--lI 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
��� Black Histic (A3) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O) -un Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,6)
,Q Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) ,Q Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Tu1 Piedmont Floodplain Sods (F19) (LRR P, S, 'i)
�Stratified Layers (A5) D Depleted Matnx (F3) u Anomalous Bnght Loamy Sods (F20)
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U) � Redox Dark Surtace (F6) (MLRA 1536)
� 5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U) Q Depleted Dark Surface (F7) T❑-I Red Parent Matenal (TF2)
D Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U) � Redox Depressions (F8) u Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
D 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, � � Marl (F10) (LRR U) � Other (Explain in Remarks)
II Depleted Below Dark Surtace (A11) D Depleted Ochnc (F11) (MLRA 151)
� Thick Dark Surface (Al2) � Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, � 'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
� Coast Praine Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A) D Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U) wetland hydrology must be present,
D Sandy Mucky Mmeral (S1) (LRR O, S) � Delta Ochnc (F17) (MLRA 151) unless disturbed or problematic
� Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) � Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 1506)
�Sandy Redox (S5) � Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
Stnpped Matrix (S6) � Anomalous Bnght Loamy Sods (F20) (MLRA 749A, 153C, 153D)
II Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictrve Layer (if observed)
Type
Depth (inches) Hydnc Sod PresentT Yes No X
Remarks
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2 0

� � � C..� � ...� ��
NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Vers�on 4.11
Date � g� � a� ��°�, Pro�ecUSite �� �`F��3����� Labtude
� �_e 35tS`�����
Evaluator ����.�� `��� � ���� County ''��� Longitude �'`� �e�a� ����
Total Points' Stream Determmation (circle one) Other
Stream �s at /east �nterm�ttent / �r%°��}� ��1 ��
if? 19 orperennial if? 30' �� F`� Ephemeral Intermittent Perenmal e g Qua Name•
A Geomor holo (Subtotal =� ) Absent Weak Moderate Strong
1a Continuity of channel bed and bank �.{ �� 0 1 2 3
2 Sinuosity of channel along thalweg 0 1 2 3
3 In-channel structure ex riffle-pool, step-pool, � � 2 3
n le- ool se uence
4 Particle size of stream substrate 1 2 3
5 Active/relict floodplam 0 1 2 3
6 Depositional bars or benches 1 2 3
7 Recent alluvial deposits 0 1 2 3
8 Headcuts 0 1 2 3
9 Grade control 0 0 5 1 1 5
10 Natural valley 0 0 5 1 1 5
11 Second or greater order channel No 0 Yes = 3
a� ����,.�a� ,.�,,,,,�� a�� ,,,,. , o,�,., ,�� ,.,,,,.u��,�„� ,,, ,�,a� �„a�
B H drolo Subtotal = .5 )
12 Presence of Baseflow 0 1 2
13 Iron oxidizmg bactena 0 1 2
14 Leaf litter 1 1 0 5
15 Sediment on plants or debns 0 0 5 1
16 Organic debris lines or piles 0 5 1
17 Soil-based evidence of high water table? No = 0
C Biolo Subtotal =
18 Fibrous roots in streambed 3 2 1
19 Rooted upland plants m streambed �`j3 2 1
20 Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance) 0 1 2
21 Aquatic Mollusks 0 1 2
22 Fish 0 0 5 1
23 Crayfish 0 5 1
24 Amphibians 0 0 5 1
25 Algae 0 0 5 1
26 Wetland plants in streambed FACW = 0 75, OBL = 1 5�(
'perennial streams may also be identified usmg other methods See p 35 of manual
Notes ctCtC.UE��€F�� ,MA n-rna.�e �'x �es�..��.. c°drr�E��.�_ e�c 9-� �
c� c c,o.�����' �a�cea��5�.a�.f�c� �cc�tr,uc,�+ �a�C4, . 4i'
Sketch � �
a �
o�` ���� �
� 1 ��, �
����o b Z �
� -0�f�� �.�'•-'• �Y� �E �. e •
��c�E�,�,� ��.�_
�
3
0
15
15
0
0
3
3
15
15
15
15
e
S�L�,a� �� � ��e�.�c��.;�'� ����
I�--��e���,�`� 4
t-1U�� �� ��1"��:ACid1`�'� .�"� ;�,#x����4t4�'��
���,�e���_ � � �
ir� t' f��� ��.4 f�k`�'� 6 t� t��`� S a�
e�n�� ����
7 ��
�

�� �� � �_
NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date
� (j � E Q � ►� Pro�ecUSite ���` � � ���� Latitude ��, ���j,� ��
�
Evaluator �t - �, _ � ��'� County. -`�— Longitude o � �� �s�����!
�i -�
Total Pomts. Stream Determination (arcle one) Other �CC?�'��l ����� ��
Stream �s at least rnterm,ttent ���� Ephemeral Intermittent Perennial e g Quad Name
if >_ 19 or erenmal �f = 30'
A Geomor holo (Subtotal = � ) Absent Weak Moderate Strong
1a Continwty of channel bed and bank � 0 1 2 3
2 Sinuosity of channel along thalweg 0 1 2 3
3 In-channel structure ex nffle-pool, step-pool, �
n le- ool se uence � 2 3
4 Particle size of stream substrate � 1 2 3
5 Active/rehct floodplain 1 2 3
6 Depositional bars or benches 1 2 3
7 Recent ailuvial deposits 1 2 3
8 Headcuts 1 2 3
9 Grade control 0 5 1 1 5
10 Natural valley 0 0 5 1 1 5
11 Second or greater order channel o= 0 Yes = 3
a artificial ditches are not rated, see discussions in manual
B H drolo (Subtotal = �'�
12 Presence of Baseflow 0 1 2 �3
13 Iron oxidizmg bactena �`�iQ 1 2 3
14 Leaf litter 1 0 5 0
15 Sediment on plants or debns � 0 5 1 1 5
16 Organic debns lines or piles � 0 5 1 1 5
17 Soil-based evidence of high water table� No = 0 Yes =
C Biolo (Subtotal =
18 Fibrous roots m streambed 3 2 1 0
19 Rooted upland plants in streambed 2 1 0
20 Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance) 1 2 3
21 Aquatic Moliusks � 1 2 3
22 Fish 0 0 5 1 1 5
23 Crayfish 0 5 1 1 5
24 Amphibians 0 0 5 1 1 5
25 Algae 0 0 5 1 1 5
26 Wetland plants in streambed FACW = 0 75, OBL = 1 5 e=
*perennial streams may also be identified usmg other methods See p 35 of manual
Notes �GS"4C�-C.aYfffi]'�GC..�< c���..a���. ��a�`� "tnc�..°- ��Y'�t�� � �� �. C����� '�
Sketch , � £� ��_�y��
rt �� °"?,,, s t � a �S"� � �C!_i �
ry�� � � (
� ����� � 5
�� ,�
� � �-- �� � �./ �G� �6"t �Q e� � � �._
��.'t��"���� �� �C"�391t?�F� � s���W �� �+t.lt.f
s � � ������� k� g�.�g �y�+./'/��` �q-�� q��y
7 � � J � T\ �tff�A �'t ' �H M�E � � � v4. a L�
� o �- �� E.� e� � � ��. � e�
:� � � � � �,� �' � ''�

� ��� ���
NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
��a �,��-°��. ����� : �.
Date � � � 4a � �� ProjecUSite .� ,� � Lat�tude• 3� �� � � � �.°�
Evaluator �}��p.��� ��� .� ��� County Longitude Q��$������
Total Points. Stream Determmation (circle one) Other �r,�����f�'t� ���+
Stream is at least �nterm�ttent ��� Ephemeral Intermittent Perenmal e g Quad Name
�f >_ 19 or aerennral �f >_ 30* a
A Geomor holo (Subtotal = � ) Absent Weak Moderate Strong
1a Continuity of channel bed and bank �� 0 1 2 3
2 Sinuosity of channel along thalweg � 1 2 3
3 In-channel structure ex nfFle-pool, step-pool, ,�, � 2 3
ri le- ool se uence �„J
4 Particle size of stream substrate 0�, 1 2 3
5 Active/relict floodplam � 1 2 3
6 Depositionai bars or benches 0�s 1 2 3
7 Recent alluvial deposits � 2 g
8 Headcuts 0 1 2 3
9 Grade control 0 5 1 1 5
10 Natural valley 0 0 5 1 1 5
11 Second or greater order channel No = 0 Yes = 3
a
a�.������� ,,,����.,� u�.. ���. ��....., .,,.....�.,.,����.,��� ��� ���o���a�
B H drolo (Subtotai = �. � )
12 Presence of Baseflow 0 1
13 Iron oxidizing bactena 1
14 Leaf litter 1 5 1
15 Sediment on plants or debns 0 5
16 Orgarnc debns lines or pdes 0 0 5
17 Soil-based evidence of high water table� No = 0
C Biolo Subtotal = )
18 Fibrous roots m streambed 3 j 2
19 Rooted upland plants in streambed 3" 2
20 Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance) � 1
21 Aquatic Mollusks � 1
22 Fish 0 r 0 5
23 Crayfish �0 0 5
24 Amphibians 0 0 5
25 Algae 0` 0 5
26 Wetland pfants m streambed FACW = 0 75, OBL = 1
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods See p 35 of manual
Notes �zt��.��,.�� ���_ai���. �a � a+- t�rec� ts `����'� ���,`+"+ev,�- �,c�e4_ ,
Sketch
�'�
2
2
05
1
1
0
0
�
0
0
0
0
0
�
3
0
15
15
0
0
3
3
15
15
15
15
L�; ��„Rc�t\..� � t�� �- � -i'��.�"��°`�'"*��
i ,,
, �,. �t t�- -�
6�...�.-...-�a.,.�.....,wa�...,s^'•....�... i..N--,. �... - _�._..__ ^.. � ^�.Q.��F __� "- - _.,-'.-�`.. <_ _ , � �` _ _. _r'' r -'__ _ _� ,� _ �..�
_ � �
5�� �� ��, P������
'�J � � 6 �` L� a,.+�° i.,t� i � 6 �� f�! ga ��-;� `�""� �'' �, 4 `� .�..��.. (
�
i� � o r � ����°� �.� E�� �+�..��� �,� ���
� � �.������ 6�:�, �-� ����� � e �,�°� �.�
� � `�' � �'..����c� � a° � �°b� �2 � �� 4� � o� � ��

����� �� �
NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date � �j � �Q � E'� Pro�ecUS�te ��l�� �'� ������" Latitude 3 � ��y �°
i;,�" � ` 42� � � �,
Evaluator �,�� `"'���,��� w g� �`�� County �� �° Longitude c'��, 9����R'��
Tota) Points. Stream Determination (circle one) Other G-� ('�@��s ��� ��
Stream �s at least �nterm�ttent � �'
�f>_ 19 or erennrel �f>_ 30` � fi Ephemeral Intermittent Perenmal e g Quad Name
A Geomor holo (Subtotal =�;? �) Absent Weak Moderate Strong
1a Continuity of channei bed and bank � 0 1 2 3
2 Sinuosity of channel along thalweg � � � Z g
3 In-channel structure ex nff1e-pooi, step-pool, ,�, � 2 3
ri le- aol se uence �
4 Particle size of stream substrate � 1 2 3
5 Active/rehct floodplam �py � z 3
6 Depositional bars or benches � 1 2 3
7 Recent alluvial deposits 0 1 2 3
8 Headcuts �` 1 2 3
9 Grade control �1 0 5 1 1 5
10 Natural valley �0 �, �.,..,. 0 5 1 1 5
11 Second or greater order channel �` No = 0� Yes = 3
a artifiaal ditches are not rated, see discussions in manual °"�Y�'"
B H drolo (Subtotal = b ��
12 Presence of Baseflow 0 2 3
13 Iron oxidizmg bactena �0� 1 2 3
14 Leaf litter 1 5 1 �.� p
15 Sediment on plants or debns 0 5 1 1 5
16 Organic debns Imes or pdes 0 5 1 1 5
17 Sod-based evidence of high water table� No =� Yes = 3
C Biolo Subtotal =
18 Fibrous roots in streambed 3 1 p
19 Rooted upland plants in streambed 3 � 1 0
20 Macrobenthos (note droersity and abundance) 1 2 3
21 Aquatic Moliusks _� � 2 g
22 Fish 0 0 5 1 1 5
23 Crayfish ['�Q.� 0 5 1 1 5
24 Amphibians _ 0 5 1 1 5
25 Algae ; 0 5 1 1 5
26 Wetland plants m streambed FACW = 0 75, OBL = 1 5 ther = 0'
`perennial streams may also be identified using other methods See p 35 of manual
Notes ����..��, sa��l;� ��e���c��� �x�-�.� ���'� 4:�e�� ����-��d��F��-� �'���
, , ' �. � � , �..r-. ��,. � � �?� � �
� �
Sketch ��n� �ias�! ��,� �-'��,�,�,� i �v i�.�� �,'�CC����+�t �,��v��.�� ��b���,.
,��� f�� ��. �'� ' .�_ y�..� �. � . , � ��,� �,��� ��� �'��'`' �
G� � `f �� _ `_ � � u" �-,P �$� ����`��.���� �`� �;,,��� a�����.�
s
P
�� k�` F �{ � �.� � �a��t'�8� �i �°` �r � �`� � �' 6"
�a�:.� , � '� �''� - E,. �^�� k � � � � ��X

� ��,� � F�
NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date � � � � �y � �'� Pro�ect/Site
���
Evaluator ������� � ����� ��s��� County� �,
Total Points.
Stream �s at least �nterm�ttent
�f _> 19 or oerennial �f >_ 30'
,��
��
Stream Determination (circle one)
Ephemeral Intermittent Perenmal
A Geomor holo (Subtotal =�) Absent
1a Continuity of channel bed and bank � 0
2 Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
3 In-channel structure ex rifFle-pool, step-pool, ��-,,
ri le- ool sequence �
4 Particle size of stream substrate k"`0`�
5 Active/rehct floodplain €'0?
6 Depositional bars or benches �.�
7 Recent alluvial deposits �
8 Headcuts +��
9 Grade control �
10 Natural valley
11 Second or greater order channel
a artificial ditches are not rated, see dis ussions in manual
B H drolo (Subtotal = o�
, 12 Presence of Baseflow 0
13 Iron oxidizmg bacteria 0
14 Leaf htter 1 5�'j
15 Sediment on plants or debns �'(}'�
16 Organic debns hnes or piles �0
17 Soil-based evidence of high water table� °�No y
C Biolo (Subtotal =
18 Fibrous roots in streambed � 3�
19 Rooted upland plants in streambed �i
20 Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance) �
21 Aquatic Mollusks LL .
22 Fish �
23 Crayfish �'�
24 Amphibians Qw0
25 Algae �
26 Wetland plants in streambed �
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods See p 35 of manual
Notes �r �c..�,-�•-'��.� �..�',��,.��,� �- � �F� �,�. tti� ,� i ��.'�, �'
G,t' -c � �'� wt �. t'�'t '� �'"`� �mx . �'�.,� L�L�-ds �
�
Sketch �,��„� •-��t;�''�'�� ��' ��,��;
.a•
� �� -- �--� -..-. r , -
��.-� -...__,,._�r%. �- a._ H �--�.�.,�,„.: __ - _ �-_-�.�.
Weak
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
05
05
1
1
05
05
Latitude �� a ��� � � �
Longitude �`��y�S� ���
�`
Other�+„c�.�`�F:.4:���'� � �
e g Quad Name
Moderate
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
1
1
Yes = 3
2
2
05
1
1
Yes = 3
2 1
2 1
1 2
1 2
05 1
05 1
05 1
05 1
FACW = 0 75, OBL = 1 5 Other = 0
� � `� � ��,"���.€�"f � ��� ��`� � �� F .
`� �� �6���,���� �
��
�., a ° � �� �� �'�,� e, � � D �°` ��a t�
i �
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
15
15
3
3
0
15
15
0
0
3
3
15
15
15
15
� }y 4 r �
��t� � � i �'" �� t � �K. � 6� �= # �4� §���4 `1 �� �� �C
� f
' .,� � � � �
' c�� R e4
�°` � � �`(�z"`, � �. � � '� � �a i� ��' `� .w
� � � ti �e 9��'��!` P� `�. �%� § � �`fM�E y1 naF;
� � Y _ , � ��. tM, � w.�t�c�,�

�,f 9 T i�i� :✓ ° �J
NC DWQ 5tream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date �, � � � d � � `� Pro�ecUSite �� �tJ� �� �f��
T7 -�
Evaluator �,�., � ��� ����j� _ � �� County �� �
Total Points' Stream Determ�nation (c�rcle one)
Stream �s atleast interm�ttent � Ephemeral Intermittent Perennial
�f >_ 19 or nerenn�al �f ? 30*
Latitude � � ,�� � ��
Longitude a� 9����'�,���
Other ��-���,�%r ���� ��
e g Quad Name
A Geomor holo (Subtotal = �) Absent Weak Moderate Strong
1a Contmuity of channel bed and bank f.l �e 0 1 2 3
2 Sinuosity of channel along thalweg �j 1 2 3
3 In-channel structure ex nffle-pool, step-pool, ,�y
n le- ool se uence (� � 2 3
4 Particle size of stream substrate 1 2 3
5 Active/relict floodplam 0 1 2 3
6 Depositional bars or benches 0 1 2 3
7 Recent alluvial deposits 1 2 3
8 Headcuts 1 2 3
9 Grade control 0 5 1 1 5
10 Natural valley 0 5 1 1 5
11 Second or greater order channel = 0 Yes = 3
a_s.�--' '-'-`-- --- --` --`--' --- -'�--��--�--- '
�.� .� � �..�.,� ..,...� �.,., .. � .. � � ... . ........ ...... .........,....,..... . � � � � �..� .....,
B H drolo (Subtotal = � )
12 Presence of Baseflow 0
13 Iron oxidizing bacteria (�j
14 Leaf litter
15 Sediment on plants or debns 0
16 Organic debns lines or piles 0
17 Sod-based evidence of high water table� o
C B�olo (Subtotal = � �°°°
18 Fibrous roots m streambed 3
19 Rooted upland plants in streambed
20 Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
21 Aquatic Mollusks
22 Fish 0
23 Crayfish �
24 Amphibians �
25 Algae �9i
26 Wetland plants in streambed
*perennial streams may also be identified using other methods See p 35 of manuai
Notes ;� � e_c�.�c�.�� �r c tesr� �a�- ��.� � � �.�'�� �.� _ 4���
Sketch � g� ��
�� o g
� p�
a ' � �.�� � B
/� � � .�- � � t �-
f
�
�
1
1
05
05
2
2
05
1
1
Yes=3
2 1
2 1
1 2
1 2
05 1
05 1
05 1
05 1
FACW = 0 75, OBL = 1 5 Other = 0
.'� � 4+�
f �
f�
tt F I s��(# 5 nP t� �k�
�
�E�
3
3
0
15
15
0
3
3
15
15
15
15
� o C.c��.c�.r���e�`��4�<�c
�'� �a�s��ar � G�`� � ��.��
��'� ����� � �`��
�� r � ������"�
:�
4�--

€�'E�G� �` F
NC DWQ Stream Identificat►on Form Version 4.11
�i l�n��, d-�� ���
Date ,��i0�� ,� Pro�ecUSite �o�
Evaluator ���v��� �• ���� .� ��� County �it.�
Total Points. Stream Determination (circle one)
Stream �s at /east �ntermittent � E hemeral Intermittent Perennial
�f >_ 19 or perenn�al if ? 30` p
Latitude °�� ��.� �, ��
Long�tude ��'�A�G�y��,�=�g�
Other�'�-�¢�4�����i` ��
e g Quad Name•
A Geomor holo (Subtotal = U) Absent Weak Moderate
1a Continuity of channel bed and bank �.i � 0 1 2
2 Smuosity of channel along thalweg �' 1 2
3 In-channel structure ex riffle-pool, step-pool, �
ri le- ool se uence � 2
4 Particle size of stream substrate � 1 2
5 Active/relict floodplain � 1 2
6 Depositional bars or benches '� 1 2
7 Recent alluvial deposits � 1 2
8 Headcuts t� 1 2
9 Grade control 0 5 1
10 Natural valley � 0 5 1
11 Second or greater order channel No = 0�
a artifiaal ditches are not rated, see discussions in manual
B H drolo (Subtotal = �
12 Presence of Baseflow �Qi 1
13 Iron oxidizing bactena � 1
14 Leaf litter 1 5 1
15 Sediment on plants or debns 0� 0 5
16 Organic debris Imes or piles �0 �� 0 5
17 Soil-based evidence of high water table� � �""iVo = 0
C Biolo (Subtotal = �)
18 Fibrous roots m streambed 3 2 ,
19 Rooted upland plants in streambed 3 2
20 Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance) 0 1
21 Aquatic Mollusks 1
22 Fish 0 5
23 Crayfish 0 5
24 Amphibians � 0 5
25 Algae � 0 5
26 Wetland plants in streambed FACW = 0 75, OBL = 1
`perennial streams may also be identified using other methods See p 35 of manual
Notes �..� e�.�r�.:���, �,�t� �� ,� n1a � i�:�� S.
Sketch
�� �
���
„� ' ,4 r .. .. e- e .. c—�. .... c= w- . •�
� Y � � ���
� �������� � - - �,�.��.
+.�r.,.'�'a�.�.a•�°""�'"...-,..,,..a-- ....��
�
�i} ��'� �� ��
�G.��6 � l'�°��'���� ��
r
" jgFerL'� u�'f
Yes = 3
2
2
05
1
1
Yes=3
�
0
0
0
�
r=0
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
15
15
3
3
15
15
0
0
3
3
15
15
15
15
�}� �,t'c�,���� �tt���.�����r��`��
�� EQ����.C1F�f�' `�1 ������ y
�A
��� �. C� � � ��^ �'-�"�, x'�`��� ��a
�� �Q��� ,����
�

�� ���� � P�
NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
1\���,� -� �R�� t,�� � �3 �`P �.�e
Date � Pro�ect/Site �
�
Evaluator ���������.��� ��� County ���.
Total Points. Stream Determination (circle one)
Streamrsat/east�nterm�ttent E hemeral Intermittent Perennial
�f >_ 19 or perenn�al if >_ 30" �� �� p
A Geomor holo (Subtotal = �...�' ) Absent
1a Continuity of channel bed and bank �� 0
2 Sinuosity of channel along thalweg �0 �
3 In-channel structure ex riffle-pool, step-pool, `"�
n le- ool se uence �-
4 Particle size of stream substrate 0`
5 Active/relict floodplam �,0
6 Depositional bars or benches �
7 Recent alluvial deposits �
8 Headcuts
9 Grade control 0 i
10 Natural valley 0'�
11 Second or greater order channel o
a artificial ditches are not rated, see discussions m manual
B H drolo (Subtotal = � )
12 Presence of Baseflow 0
13 Iron oxidizmg bactena
14 Leaf litter 1 5
15 Sediment on plants or debns 0
16 Organic debris lines or pdes �0,,,,i
17 Sod-based evidence of high water table� No
C Biolo Subtotal = � e � `� ) "�`
18 Fibrous roots in streambed 3
19 Rooted upland plants in streambed
20 Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
21 AquaUc Moilusks �
22 Fish 0
23 Crayfish 0
24 Amphibians
25 Algae �
26 Wetland plants in streambed
`perennial streams may also be identified using other methods See p 35 of manual
Notes ���t.�t.adsr�.�.<a�A ��'�c�r. s�, ���r�nr� �,s.�ne �, <
d` O� u �t� �' a'�.`��'• ,
Sketch �'°� �, � � ��
�'�. �-��� ." �"��z,�� i ��� �a � �
�,,w�,�`�` q �e'� t
�
��.. � �. � , - � < f � , < <
� �,�`°� �-t ���� �� � �� `�
���
/eak
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
05
05
�'�7
�
��
�
�
�
�
�i�7
� �-�� . � �.�—��c�'�� �
2
2
1
1
05
OS
05
05
N=0
Latitude �� ��� �� �
Longitude a ��� t� ��
OtherC�►,r�tr��4���`y �
e g Quad Name
Moderate
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
1
1
Yes = 3
2
2
05
1
1
Yes=3
1
2
2
1
1
1
1
= 1 5 Other = 0
�
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
15
15
3
3
0
15
15
0
0
3
3
15
15
15
15
�+.
$��s ��'�i��+�����e�������`°� ������.
�� �.�'f'���.�.� k�,� �� �-��� � � �"'���
� ��
�� � ��� ��� �� � � �
���, �� �
�

���� � �
NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
PN[n l-ew� �-jt� a�� c'a�.
Date `t ��(,�� � � Pro�ecUSite �^q a
Evaluator ��r�e� � `�� _ ��-�� County. � �
,
Total Points• Stream Determmation (circle one)
Stream �s at /east mterm�ttent �� Ephemeral Intermittent Perennial
rf >_ 19 or perennial �f >_ 30`
A Geomorpholo (Subtotal =,�) Absent Weak
1a Continuity of channel bed and bank � 0 1
2 Smuosity of channel along thalweg � 1
3 In-channel structure ex nffle-pool, step-pool, �
n ple- ool sequence �
4 Particle size of stream substrate 1
5 Active/relict floodplain �
6 Depositional bars or benches 1
7 Recent alluvial deposits 1
8 Headcuts 1
9 Grade control 0 0 5
10 Natural valley 0 �0 5
11 Second or greater order channel o= 0
a artifiaal ditches are not rated, see discussions in manual
B H drolo Subtotal = a 5
12 Presence of Baseflow 0 1
13 Iron oxidizing bactena � 1
14 Leaf litter 1 1
15 Sediment on plants or debns 0 0 5
16 Organic debris Imes or pdes 0 0 5
17 Soil-based evidence of high water table? No = 0
C Biolo (Subtotal = —t, S )
18 Fibrous roots in streambed 2
19 Rooted upland plants in streambed 3 2
20 Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance) �
21 Aquatic Mollusks 0 1
22 Fish �0 0 5
23 Crayfish 0 0 5
24 Amphibians 0 5
25 Aigae (�0 0 5
26 Wetland plants m streambed FACW = 0
"perennial streams may also be identified using other methods See p 35 of manual
Notes �,� � � .t < .�,�,�_ r� � ��r�. �c?�t��.�� ,� `���,�� k�E
Sketch ������ � �
�� � c,,.�_
�� � �.� c�
� `»�--��.. � ' t -.,��� � — - - � �- _ _ � �
� -- ._.. _._ _ _� _ - - - -- -�-- �- E�EV¢,�� � vt,,fc w � ,.� ., . .,.,�._.� �.,.�...� �,..
�;�`�s�; ������-a�� � `� s.�� �,
,�6�=—� � ��; �, e �`e �'t ��E"? t h"�'�,t��.�'`'="� t ,�
Latitude �� ,�� �r �'
Longitude �''�����' �i�t�
Other �,�,g����g���� S �
e g Quad Name
Moderate
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
1
1
Yes = 3
2
2
05
1
1
Yes = 3
1
1
2
2
1
1
1
1
='1�5`r Other = 0
Strong
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
15
15
3
3
0
15
15
0
0
3
3
15
15
15
15
�G 4p�"'I�,�y�{��`t� �}rG1� u1 R-Tf.(L.
� � r o c�r�c��,� ��, �sre.-�
N V�F ["' t(k�(�- E-il !4' � tily °�,�.¢'t � `F f<'T
3 �'..��� ��`�� - � �
�
�
S

r—
�.� ���,���°��
NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 411
Date � Pro�ecUSite �a� �F�� � ���
���� �'+� ��3E�
Evaluator �+ �f�,��ff `��,��� �, ���� County 7�.�—
Total Points: Stream Determmation (circie one)
Stream �s at /east �ntermrttent � Ephemeral Intermittent Perennial
if >_ 19 or nerennial if ? 30`
Latitude: �� � � �� �
Longitude -°�'�, �2�� �
Other ��ec�v� �1 �� ,�€�
e g Quad Name
A Geomor holo (Subtotal = � ) Absent Weak Moderate Strong
1a Continuity of channel bed and bank � 0 1 2 3
2 Sinuosity of channel along thalweg 1 2 3
3 In-channel structure ex rifFle-pool, step-pool, /^� � 2 3
ri le- ool se uence �/'
4 Particle size of stream substrate 1 2 3
5 Active/relict floodpiain 1 2 3
6 Depositional bars or benches 0 1 2 3
7 Recent alluvial deposits �` 1 2 3
8 Headcuts 0 1 2 3
9 Grade control 0 5 1 1 5
10 Natural valley 0 5 1 1 5
11 Second or greater order channel o= 0 Yes = 3
a„���,.�a� „„����� a�� ��,,, �q,� , ��,.�., �„��� ��� ���a���a�
B H drolo (Subtotal = )
12 Presence of Baseflow
13 Iron oxidizing bacteria
14 Leaf litter 5
15 Sediment on plants or debns 0
16 Organic debris lines or pdes 0 j
17 Soil-based evidence of high water table� �`~�"` � No =
C Biolo (Subtotal = "'°�
1S Fibrous roots in streambed 3
19 Rooted upland plants in streambed 3
20 Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance) ��
21 Aquatic Mollusks �p
22 Fish � �
23 Crayfish 0
24 Amphibians 0
25 Algae �
26 Wetland plants in streambed
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods See p 35 of manual
Notes �-�c�� ba_.�- ��. ��-��u �v� � � � � �� F�-€��.�F2 1 �
i b�� 1�� ����t t ff" CP_ 4_�. Y���'^
Sketch .
� �.�F ��
>
!i1 p �,y �. �i � �� �� �" �'r`� - �n'i�.
�i '
� � ..l � �'� ! 66P�� V Q$� '� 4fi`t ��
1
1
05
05
2
2
05
1
1
2 1
2 1
1 2
1 2
05 1
05 1
05 1
05 1
FACW = 0 75, OBL = 1 5
Yes=3
��
3
3
0
15
15
0
0
3
3
15
15
15
15
Y""� £�C�'S��''��£!G �1�iilit,c�i�..�$ Yd
� 6 C.���`���.�°��a� �-� ���� �� C�^
��✓i �`��TM_�t'�� ���`,. 7�;'hR.� � �`,Y
R..,. 4 j
� �t ' � w 4�+ � ;�"�
�, �
��� ��� �� r� �"����.'.� �t�``�� � �
7d"��. �_.
�' �

� a�.� �T��_��
NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Versaon 4.11
� c.F���&�' €"���1.s.�
Date � (� � �� � �'� Pro�ecUSite ..� �� �
Evaluator ,����.��,� ���� County ���- �
Total Points• Stream Determ�nation (circle one)
Stream �s at /east �nterm�ttent �� Ephemeral Intermittent Perennial
�f >_ 19 or perenn�al if >_ 30'
Latitude � �, �`� � �� �
Longitude .,'����� � � �
Other (`;<<��p���e� ��
e g Quad Name
A Geomor holo (Subtotal = �.� ) Absent Weak Moderate Strong
1a Continuity of channel bed and bank � 0 1 2 3
2 Sinuosity of channel along thalweg 0 1 2 3
3 In-channel structure ex nfFle-pool, step-pool, � �� � 2 3
n le- ool se uence
4 Particle size of stream substrate _b� 1 2 3
5 Active/rehct floodplam �p'�'� 1 2 3
6 Depositional bars or benches 8°^� 1 2 3
7 Recent alluvial deposits ,� 1 2 3
8 Headcuts 0 1 2 3
9 Grade control R 0 0 5 1 1 5
10 Natural valley ,� 0� 0 5 1 1 5
11 Second or greater order channel No = 0� Yes = 3
a
QILIIIli1Q1 4111iI1cJ GIIG I�VL iPlc � cG �/ia�.a�a��vl�u I�i I�ICIIIUOI
B H drolo (Subtotal = fl )
12 Presence of Baseflow �� 1
13 Iron oxidizmg bacteria 1
14 Leaf litter 1 5 1
15 Sediment on plants or debns 0 0 5
16 Organic debris lines or piles 0 0 5
17 Soii-based evidence of high water table� No = 0
C Biolo (Subtotal = �
2 3
2 3
05 �
1 15
1 15
Yes = 3
18 Fibrous roots in streambed 3 2 1
19 Rooted upland plants in streambed 3 �' 1
20 MaCt'obenthos (note diversity and abundance) ('_0`a 1 2
21 Aquatic Mollusks � 1 2
22 Fish 0 5 1
23 Crayfish �0� 0 5 1
24 Amphibians �A� 0 5 1
25 Algae 0� 0 5 1
26 Wetland plants in streambed FACW = 0 75, OBL = 1 5 Other
`perenn�al streams may also be identified using other methods See p 35 of manual
Notes �x r�ar�f� rk r$C �.. �� ���, �����, e�` ���r� � Ck� � u$ E Et� v� �+�� �'��F�z-x�•,.
�
Sketch * � �s`�`�';�`� �
E�F
, -�
4 ��
.� , - --�=u,.�.�,�. �.
� �p� ,�..— _ �
f ¢
� n���SL`T��' fi'•.�
�
,. `r��;�a; �#�- aL�.. �r-�' c
�
�
°�'� � ' ���t �� � � tx� � t �'? � �� �'�'�-"`�`
:..,�
0
0
3
3
15
15
15
15
6u€� �� €�.� �e�� �� �� t�,.�� � p��� �tf�.-g� ��
e�
� � C.�>��- ����N��� "'��. ;� �'� �`-� � `� ��
� e�,� i�'t �,(���F� �ao� � �'� ��``�
�� �, ��„ � a
��`si�� �� ay � °' �;

Attachment 6
Photographs

PNG Line 43 Replacement Project
Ditch D-1 looking south. This agricultural ditch
drains south into a roadside drainage ditch along
Dickinson Ave.
Ditch D-1 looking east along Dickinson Ave.
Ditch D-1 looking west along Dicki�lson Ave.
PCN Application
Ditch D-2 adjacent to agricultural field near
Dickinson Ave. where it drains to the Ditch D-1
roadside drainage (foreground).
Ditch D-3 adjaeent to overhead utility line
easement.
Ditch D-3 adjacent to overhead utility line
easement.
Photographs Applicant - Piedmont Natural Gas

PNG Line 43 Replacement Project
Ditch D-4 near Ditch D-3.
Ditch D-J ❑ear llitcl� D-�
Ditch D-6 in agricultural field.
PCN Application
Ditch D-7 through upland woods.
l�itch D-8 through upland woods.
Ditch D-9 looking east alongside Stantonsburg
Road.
Photographs Applicant - Piedmont Natura! Gas

PNG Line 43 Replacement Project
Ditch D-10 in agricultural field.
Ditch D-1 1 near utility easement in upland
woods.
Photo looking north near southern portioi� of
project area near City Gate #5.
PCN Application
Photo looking north near soil boring B-1.
Photo looking south at temporary workspace
near the southern portion of the project.
Photo looking east near soil boring B-2.
Photographs Applicant - Piedmont Natural Gas

PNG Line 43 Replacement Project
Photograph looking east near soil boring B-4.
Photograph looking south at overhe�d utility
easement from Frog Level Road.
Photograph looking north aC overhead utility line
easement from Frog Level Road.
PCN Application
Photograph lookinff west near soil boring B-5.
Photograph looking south near soil boring B-6.
Photograph looking east near soil boring B-7.
This is the upland boring near wetland W-1.
Photographs Applicant - Piedmont Natural Gas

PNG Line 43 Replacement Project
Photograph looking north at wetland W-1 near
soil boring B-8.
Photograph looking east near soil boring B-9
Photograph looking north near soil boring B-10.
PCN Application
;d,�
�i
'; ,
:._��r
Photograph looking souch near soil boring B-11
Photograph looking west at Line 403 ROW near
GUC's City Gate #5 off Landmark Street;
existing curb (left side of photo) is for a future
parking lot.
_-�::=� -
Photograph looking south at Line �103 ROW
through an existing parking lot.
Photographs Applicant - Piedmont Natural Gas

PNG Line 43 Replacement Project
Photograph looking south at proposed
Temporary Construction Storage Yard in an
agricultural field near the intersection of Route
13 and Speight Seed Farm Road.
PCN Application
Photographs Applicant - Piedmoni Natural Gas

Attachment C
NCDOT Correspondence

�
From: Kretchman, Douglas W [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2013 8:07 AM
To: Benton, Charles
Cc: Moore, Brenda L; Adam, Chris J
Subject: RE: R-2Z50 expansion - Piedmont NG Line 43
Mr. Benton,
Please see the attached wetland file for the R-2250 project. I have also attached our design file along with two of our
survey files showing the existing conditions to help you locate the Stantonsburg road area.
Let me know if you need anything additional.
Thank you,
Douglas W. Kretchman, PE
Assistant Project Design Engineer
NC Dept. of Transportation
Phone: [phone]
From: Moore, Brenda L
Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2013 8:25 AM
To: Adam, Chris J; Kretchman, Douglas W
Subject: FW: R-2250 expansion - Piedmont NG Line 43
Please provide the requested information to Charlie. Thanks.
From: Benton, Charles fmailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Monday, November 11, 2013 10:54 AM
To: Moore, Brenda L
Cc: Benton, Charles
Subject: R-2250 expansion - Piedmont NG Line 43
Brenda Moore,
I am working on the Piedmont NG Line 43 project in Greenville, NC, and understand that you are the DOT contact that
may be able to supply me with some data from the R-2250 expansion project that is in the same vicinity as the proposed
pipeline near Stantonsburg Road.
I would like to get any wetland/stream delineation files that have been conducted in this area, and know if the
delineations have received a JD from the USACE.
Thank you,
Charlie Benton, P.W.S
Senior Environmental Scientist
URS Corporation-North Carolina

Benton, Chartes
From: Kretchman, Douglas W <[e-mail]>
Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2013 8:39 AM
To: Benton, Charles
Cc: Moore, Brenda L; Adam, Chris J
Subject: RE: R-2250 expansion - Piedmont NG Line 43
Mr. Benton,
I spoke with our Natural Environment Section and they said that the streams and wetlands shown in their file
(R2250_RDY_WET_V8.dgn) are Jurisdictional.
The streams shown in the PS files I sent can be assumed to be non-jurisdictional unless also shown in the WET file.
Thanks,
Douglas W. Kretchman, PE
Assistant Project Design Engineer
NC Dept. of Transportation
Phone: [phone]
From: Benton, Charles fmailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2013 11:16 AM
To: Kretchman, Douglas W
Cc: Moore, Brenda L; Adam, Chris J
Subject: RE: R-2250 expansion - Piedmont NG Line 43
Mr. Kretchman,
Thank you for this data. Would you know if the wetlands/streams depicted in the vicinity of the R-2250 expansion area
have received a Jurisdictional Determination from the US Corps of Engineers?
Regards,
Charlie Benton, P.W.S
Senior Environmental Scientist
URS Corporation-North Carolina
1600 Perimeter Park Drive, Suite 400
Raleigh, North Carolina 27560
[e-mail]
919.461.1100 Main
919.461.1435 Direct
Ple�se note my NEV�.� Mobile # is now 919 946.3122
919.461.1415 Fax
1

Line 43
Replacement Project
Greenville
Pitt County
North Carolina
C41��i�Cil"r10Pil.
��:�tt��ral C+�s
Legend
� 8 Digit HUC
Project Route
,;��� NCDOT Wetland
------- NCDOT R2250
Source'. NCDOT
R2250 RDV_WET.VB.tlgn S
R2250c RDV DSN.dpn
obtained by URS on 71l7312013
� 4 T�.
j� \
c�_��� � �� �
-- � J-.. y �,y �
�r
COUNTY
� Pitt
Neuse River Watershed
HUC - 03020202 & 03020203
Tar-Pamlico River Watershed
HUC - 03020103
Figure 3
NCDOT Wetlands
Deceinber 2013
This map �is for reference only.

Attachment D
NC EEP Mitigation Approval Letter

�•-
�
Ecos�stem
PROGRAM
December 1 l, 2013
Chris Albers
Piedmoi�t Natural Gas
4720 Piedmont Ro�nr Drive
Charlotte. NC 282 ( 0
Etipiration of Acceptance: June I l. ?Old
Project: l,ine 4� Replacement Countp�: Pitt
This is a conditional �cceptance letter.
�The purpose of this letter is to notify you that the North Carolina Ecosystein Enhancement ProQrail� (NCGEP) is ���illii�g to accept
payment for compensatory miti�ation for impacts associated �vith the above referenced project under the conditions outlined belo�v.
Please note that this decision does not assure that participation in the NCEEP «�ill be approved b� the permit issuinQ aQencies as
i7�itivation for pro,ject impacts. It is the responsibility of the applicant to contact these agencies to determine if payn�ent to the NCEEP
will be approved. You must alsu com�ly with all other state, federal or local Qovernment permits. re�=ulations or authorizations
associated with tl�e pro�osed activitv includin� SL ?009-337: An Act to Promote the Use of Compensatorv Miti;ation Banks as
amended by S.L. ?01 I-343.
This acceptance is valid for six months Pi�om the date of this letter and is nut h•ansferable. If we have i�ot reeei� ed a copy of the
issued 40d Permit/401 Ce�-tification/CAMA permit h�ithin this time frame, this acceptance ���ill expire. It is the applicant's
responsibilit} to send copies of d�e permits lo NCEEP. Once NCEEP receives a copy of the �ermit(s) an invoice � ill be issiied based
on the required mitigation in U�at permit and payment must be inade prior to conducting the authorized ���orl:. �The amount of the li�-
Lieu Fee to be paid to NCF.EP by an applicant is calculated based upon the Fee Schedule and policies listed at ti�aw.nceep.net.
Based on the infonnation supplied by you in yow- request to use the NCEEP, the impacts that mav require compensatorv miti`�ation are
summarized in the follo���in<� table. The amount of mitigation required and assigned to NCEEP for this impact is determined bv
permitting a��encies and may exceed the itnpact aroounts shown below.
River CU I Stream (feetj
Basin Location
' Cold
Impact Tar-Pamlicc� 0�0�0103*� 0
Cool I Warm
Wetlands (aa�es)
Non-Rinarian � Coastal Marsh
Up to 0.50
Bufifer 1 Buffer ll
(Sq. Ft.) (Sq. Ft.)
The above impacts comply with the Small Impacts Policy as described in Section IV. E. of the N.0 Department of Environment and
Natural Resources� Ecosvstem Enhancement Pro�_ram In-Lieu Fee Inst��ument dated Jul�� 28. ZO10. Upon receipt of payment EFP will
provide sufficieni compensatory miti��ation credits in Tar-Pamlieo 03020103, 03020104 or 03020105 to offset the impacts associated
��-ith this project as specitied bv the permitting agencies using the deliver�� timeline outlined in Section F. �.c.iii of the In-Lieu Fee
Instrument.
Thank you for yo�u- interest in the NCEEP. If you have any questions or need additional information. please contact Kell� W illiams at
(919)707-891�.
Sinccrely,
; i , � � +
James. B Stanfill
Asset Management Supen�isor
cc: Karen Hi�gins, NCDWR Wetlands�401 Unit
VVilliam Wescott. 11SACF-Washinr�ton
Charles Bei�ton, avent
File
Re,sto�r;t�t�... � ... P�otect� Ot�r,Y .fta,te
�� � l.
r
e�n
NCDENR
North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program, 1652 Mail Service Center, Raleigh. NC 27699-1652 / 919-707-8976 ! www.nceep.net

Attachment E
NC HPO Concurrence Letter

� �,a. STATp q.�
`Y� N,,m.�n,
� 1 _ � - D
�� ,�.n �>,�. ��
�
North Carolina Department of Cultural Resources
State Historic Preservation Office
Ram�mn ;11. Bartos, .ldmtnistrator
G�nrm��r Pat �Ic(:rnrc
Sccrctan' �usan Iilutn
januar�� 10, 201-4
Danicl F. Cassed��, Ph.D.
L?RS Corporation
1600 Perimeter Park Dri�-e, Suite 400
1��lorris��ille, NC 2756O
clauicLcls�c��l���u�ur:.r��m
( )t�lcc n� .Archiccs:�nJ I lisu�n�
Ucputc ticcrcinrc liccin (:hcrrc
Re: PNC Line �3 Replacement, lines �00, 401 & 403, Greenville, Pitt Counn�, ER 13-2893
Dear Dr. Cassedy:
Thank you for your letter of December 2, 2013, transmitting the archaeological survet� report b�� 1��latthew
jorgenson and Marvin .�. Brown oE URS for the abo�re project.
During the course ��t the sur�-ey, no sites ��exe located �vithin the project area. Mr. �orgenson has recommended
that no further archaeological invesrigation be conducted in connecuon ��ith this project. A�'e concur with this
recommendation since the project will not in�rolve significant archaeological resources.
Z'he above comments are made pursuant to Section 106 of the Narional Historic Preser�-ation l�ct and the
_�d�-isory Council on Historic Preservation's Regularions for Compliance ��-ith Secuon 106 codified at 36 CI'R
Part 500.
Thank ��ou for �•our cooperation atid consideration. If �-ou ha�re yuestions concerning the aboee comment,
contact Renee Gledhill-Earle��, environmental re�-ie�� coordinator, at 919-807-6579 or rc�n��c�,lc�lhill-
c�irlc� !r� ,�c�icr.r� �� . In all future communicarion concerning this projeet, please cite the abo�-e referenced
tracl�in� number.
Sincerel�-,
.) }��_ c,
� � C-�_Q fr.�-� � �h,� �.� � - ( �,�t ��1p t�a:
�,�
�a✓Ramona I�L I3artos
t„'
cc: 1��1att �orgenson, URS, u�att.l�>r�cnsc�n(it�;urs.c<m1
I�cation: IU9 I:a.i ���ncs titr��a. Ralci�h N(:?7GU1 MaiGngAddress:4Gl7 ��1ail ticnicc (:cnter. Ralriqh N(' 27G99-�1G1 ; Telephone/Fax: (919) 811+-G5;II,�SOi-(5')9

LAYDOWN
' — YARD
�%
US Z� „T �S �J
J
. a.
10550 Richmond, Suite 155
Houston, TX 77042
'Piedmont
Natural Gas
4720 Piedmont Row Drive
Charlotte, NC 28210
' �s � '� I. ��� .
��
_ � e�
os ..
ti
;� '.q,.. N.T.S
RECEIVER 8 1
d
� CITY GATE #3 ---_` o o.zs o.s (`
i 4
% `�---�_, Mles
i - . ^�
R - ,\ ,
MP-3 .�^' �y?�;, �i
MP-2 ' � � � 4 ��'••
/�� �,r'ti': ryFn"•uc�� � ,.m, , ,.��
/ ,n��A`' ..,��e�n° r �^� / L e ../� {� � .
.. . / y� � � + - �.....�.i , � '.,� '�e` .
�
. �, •S
�� .? a3` �r„/ �. .��_"�e?��w�
♦ ,;r�' •� 4�
Q�� +.,
' `` 't
�� �Q\ , z.r • . �: f � '" .
1,` ^+
`,� f�P ,, • ' �;,,.
,;
� .�J�P� t*`�• - ,,... '°`�
?P + , ,� fi
�o�o r.� .,r,. �, .,
OQ�� ` ° �� �` `�- � `
CITY GATE #5 Q� � - . �� r �`� � ' �� '�
s� ���.l '' � . , v �^ � r �f , ,,<,� , , �
� � .�yC•j � '.y :'l � �� 3 n_' S (Y„ �� � y-".� ��..+:::
LAUNCHER � � o;�k�� ,,,A�eE,� ; ;. �.,J a� �
; \ _ '''�—�,_ . `3 .� g � x — , ' � �� YY. j� \.__ �, �"f
� - �. � , � . - ? ` . . `• ^'r� ,' •1 /
, .. . �. \\\\\� ' - .. . . . /� .s aa� /
, .�.^+ ``'c f; _.. � . J " ' ,' .
� .t,�� '^�ia , j,� q . , .. h , _ .
�\ .i . Q'1 Yn ' � ' � � ... . ` ,' . � ' �.>�
�� ,J � ` ` ,.,'4 `C° � p • ,.4K� y
� . }`„ y,/, ,''n V �' .. yd•_ ^fr` � � `�, 1` � � 'J .
4 ` �; a u
� ��•�' �r � . <�•� 'Yr� •r ` _
•'�� •�yrin 4+y,o A .a . � M j-
�� 9{' <� ' . �F' �k - ��T.K:�9' _ '�,-�f . • �
. ; _ . y� � \ �r. r � � .
� � fn �, � ^ },{�a� > � ` F `.. f _
`,G r'� . .,. _� �yr ;•i` F&
��e...t t YY � � J iFr� � I#e � ` t a 4��9 �� 5. L�' '�ti�.
. V"�" : ~' �' ' � L' �i�+ �� Sd �RJ t`* :! . i
w i fP� � �� 4 .�' �p �a. ry � # 04�J 1C" � �k �t .. . • .
.._4..r Y `.�„ ; .. � '' �J ': } a
, Y �'� -. .. .•Ya Fa°.0 . c. - _ � ': cer . .
.z �-J:! M v -�/ - �+:,� � �4'�. � A� � . �1. ..
,1� ,.�� � .�• Flry eA�o -i'��� ' , \ `i
. 7' .. 5 . i:� S" i � `� . (�� _*� � . ��`'\� t� � ��
� .S / � _ "��n,.. Ye ` ` .. . � y. Na
'r < j , / �. . • % � - CITY GATE #2 ��< f �'°`� _ ,
\ _ � G ,.� `' , /� � ___. .�._
LINE 43 REPLACEMENT
U S A C E 4 0 4/ 4 0 1 C O V E R
PROPOSED 6" NATURAL GAS PIPELINE
PITT COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
DRAWING N0: 43 USACE.0 001
URS PROJECT NO: 39911138

SHEET TITLE SHEET TITLE SHEET TITLE SHEET TITLE
43-SEGC-001 COVER G3SEGEG007 GTY GP.TE 2 AND LAVDOWN VARD
43SEGGEN-001 GENERAL NOTES 43SECATL-001 DETAI�S
a3-SEGI-001 INDEXSHEET 4}SEGDTL-002 DETAILS
43-SEGEC-001 STA 0�00 - 35+00 435EC-0TL-003 DETAILS
d3-SEC-EC-002 STA 36�00-65�00 03SEC-0TL-004 DETAllS
a3�SEC-EG003 STA 69+00 - 103�00 43SEC-0TL-005 DETAllS
43-SEC-EG004 STA 103�00-t3��00 43SEC-0TL-006 DETAILS
43-SEGEC�005 STA 13��00-1�4.00 43-SEC-DIL-0W DETAILS
43-SEC-EG006 STA 174.00 - 8�10*25 tEND� 435ECLMD-007 CIXJSTRUCTION MET100S
n
a
NOTES
. f
EC ;007 = _� � �
,- - � � ,
EC-003
Sq
#
�
�
0 2,000 4,000
Feet
��� = 2����
�nJC uaey
cwe
1
f
EDGECOMBE
COUNTY
WILSON /
COUNTY
GREENE
COUNTY
KEY MAP I
�-/ � MARTIN
COUNTY
\
EAUFOR
COUNTY
rP�n
COUNTY
, N
�,.. , ��
1 j µ'
� � �
- ---- , ' EC-004 .
02 -- '
_ �. _ _--- -
�G.O .: '"�, � ---
1
_ �--� � � EC-005 � .
Go�.� `,, // —� - - - --- _-- EC-006 �,� � f ...,,..
� �'� � � +� -- --- --- �' �!E'�,.
s_ `
-��_ � �'
I
��-. . �_� .. ... {.
\�: _ �11 �. . ' �` , .
�`1 O -.. ��•
\ � '_'• ,.., +
� � �
F , ;r
_ .. \'`i�� �� . � -, •F ' • y., � .:.z�� _
. ', � ; .. .. � i '
` � . �
�._. . i , " - � �, - �' , \ . . i = . t
.,.. � i _.. ,s.� .....,, q N,,•'`` � ��.
, `N , ..
' . ' ' -
. �
t. _ .. I�, . ta . . .
...... ' J. ,....k � � � � ��' _rv \�4 'r \ .. iti ��� � .
. . � . � ., ,� �.. �y: ( ���H � � . .. .
•� . �., � _ ' , � , . - � � . ' ' � µ .
j � s r \ . , � � �� . . �. .
�- ' nr � �. . . .. �s . :�\ . .. '�.:���, ., _
r`�' .wr^° . >> , .. � _ ��t
. � � � , � . . d .' . . � , - . ... . ,`ilt : , . � •"� �h �1� . .. . � .
' c,« �cW r ��1 . ��.
cwe
il�i �.,e,M:,E. ,
z , - .,. .,,,
`� r � f,' . �' ,,,a '�.
��� r - ,,, EC 007 �!i
_ —� ' .
LEGEND REVISIONS
I NO DATE DESCRIPTION
� PROPOSED CENTERLINE y- RAILROADS I A 02l102014 ISSUED FOR CONSTRUCTION
SHEETS ROADS �
HIGHWAYS LAKES � � �
RIVERS COUNTY BOUNDARIES
I i- ACCESS ROADS � -
"�� ' . R _ ,.. '���.. - , __ � L ia�. �
p � 2.':.�:.t . . i
. ,` � � '.�� � , f
: ,a
.. � � ,!, �
�� f
�'� . %
u. • --�
�
� E. ,�,�.
REPERENCE DRAWINGS
ENG DRAWN CHK DRAWING NO TITLE
DC WF . NF i �-
�: �� t M
' ... ��� � � � s
, '
;� '
\
,' ! �
,�
UR$ �O�I Piedmont
. URS Corporation - North W rolina N a t u ra I G a s
— North Carolina License # C-2263
-�oe No. se9iiila LINE 43 REPLACEMENT PROJECT
-cueN7 �oe No _2�seoss. USACE 404/401 INDEX SHEET
PITT COUNTY, NC
� ��IDRAWN BY�. CHECKED BY. APPROVED BY' SCALE
i WF NF DC 1" = 2.000'
. DATE: ORAWING NO- REV
02�10�2014 43-USACE-I-001 SHEET 1 OF 9 A

NOTES
L E G E N D
� ProposeoCemen�ne • HDOEniryErn
� MaicM1i�nes :-. CoirFinerONlei
Contoun �j SoiiBwin�
- -' — Silt Fence Pen^arie Eaeement
-,. - s�p��snic���e � E�iaremowonsoace
'I — Dive�swn Tenace a �imns oi Dis�urbance
�. — Parcel BounOary ,� Consiruciwn En��ance
��m y:_;..p
a Cuiven �.f.:.� Boro Prt
Ditcn - TemP Br�a9e
, ✓�, v.t�m�a
a�ows�asw�i.a�io�sia„ sous
R E V 1 S 1 O N 5
NO �ATE �ESCRIPTIpN
A 02/70l2014 ISSUED FOR CONSTRUCTION
ENG DRRWH CxN
NF SF
�
REFERENCE DRAWINGS
DRUWiNG NG TiTLE
jJR$ �' Piedmont
�RS �o�PO�a�o� . No�h �a�o���a ro N at u ra I G a s
Nonn ca�o.��a ��ce�se a c-z.a3
uRS�osNO sssni3a LINE 43 REPLACEMENT PROJECT
� CLIENT JOB NO z�aeoss 404/40'1 PERMIT PLANS
FROM STATION 0+00 TO STATION 36+00
� DRAWN BV� CHECKED BV' APPROVED BY� SCALE
NF SF DC
, DATE. DRAWWGNO. SHEET 2 OF 9
I 02n0.�2014 43�USACE-001
1"= 60'
H[ V
A

NOTES
LEGEND
� � c�or��=a cemem�e
�I � Malc�lines
- �� — 5 InFence
- _.-. - SuDer Sin cen<e
— Drversron Tertace
— ParcelBOUndary
�,m
a cw"�,�
on�n
- Ro�av
:ea s..,ie aeio�ai�o�
� !fD�EnWE�i�
�- Coi� F�Xer Outiel
!�j SoiiBonng
PermarcM Easemenl
OE.�n1�m�N.b,�soa«
Q�im2s ol Drs�ur�ance
� ConsiruciwnEn�rance
� s��. P�
- r�mo e�ase
i�/ v�ria�e
sous
REVISIONS
NO DnTE DESCRiPTiON
. A 02n012014 ISSUEDFORCONSTRUCTION
REFERENCE DRAWINGS
�RAWN CMK ORPW�NGN!� TITLE
NF SF ,
��� ��s �o,po,a��a�o���a
NeM Carolina License # C-2..4J --
j URS J06 NO. 39911138
�i CLIENT J08 NO 2739066
CO�'Piedmont
Natural Gas
LINE 43 REPLACEMENT PROJECT
404/40'1 PERMIT PLAN
FROM STATION 36+00 TO STATION 69+00
DRAWN BV' CHECKED BY APPROVED BV SCA�E
NF SF DC 1" = 60'
DATE DRAWING NO SHEET 3 OF 9 A`�
02/102014 43�USACE-002 A

. , . � . . . . . . � � - . . . � . . . �
.. . . � .. � . . . . `� 87
. . . .. - . . '\ -. '� � . .. �. � . �
`_ \� , \� \� �� � ``., ,\�;`.\ ..\ . \ \ ..\+ `., \\\ \ .., '. \ � ,���
\ ���\\\, \� �� \ \ �_`\ \\ ��.\\\ �\\\ \ \� � � �\ � ��\\\ \ �\\ �. � \ ` \
` \\\\`..\`\` \\\��\�\� \� � \ � .. � � � \\\\ \ �\ \ � \\ `. \\ �\
� �\�\�\\ \ \�� � �\\� .\�\��\� � ��\� \\\\ �\ ``\��.\�• ``\��..\\\ �`•.\ \
. \ ' � - �'� � �'� \
,,� � \ � \ � `� \ \, .. -.
�• \��\\ \ \ �`.,\� �\��\� � �'� \�\\� �i � ` \ \ \ \ .�
\ � � � �. 1 '\ � ��` , ' ����'� `.. �' �
\ '., `\ ` ���\�`\ � \ \ �\ \
� �� �\\ \� \�� � ,` � ` . � \\� �\�\� \
EDWARDS TIM9ER CO tNC �\ \\ �\\� � \ ���� �� � � _, \\ �\ � ' _ \ ' �
.. Oa� \ � ���\ � \� �\ _ - � - -
reraon�m swoce - - -�� -. - - -
,'! ___ _ - - __ -- - - -_ -_ _ - -
1
Oa - - - - - - - - -_ - .`'{ �` � �
� � .I: � - � _:
_ - - _ _ - - F- - - -' - - 4 '. y�, �:�.'."i � _ _ r - - -�= S,•,,, F \ R � � • \� . �
i°' \� \ �\\
� ti Y► , s...., " r.� ,� + ' . - . � �� . � �. \ � . ` •..
_ ° �". - � � � � '' \ � n � a• �� �'� \�"��\\\ �\
J- f �� v \ �\ \ � . '� '� '. ' , ��\ `, \
_ ,�'�� . . • � � � — � ��� '�' � '� �� �\ \ �� \ \� � •� ��
_ - -- �:r.a'� sL yy- �� �.- -� � —.� '�,I: `.�� �,ry ,�— . �82��� � . `` \ � � \\`'�\��. \� ��C��\ �`t �
�,e � .. . _ -' � �,.'y: �'!�T � _ - .r � ,a, � . ' i� i . - ' � \ i J ` \ %`�`.. � �' ��
+ 1!S -� - - - - - ORAUOYJEIL ED�7H lEE � \ � �� �j%'�.. •� �,`\
r.. . `� � � � • ~ , � � �( \�. ,� .
. _ � SHLLC � � • ,`. . `� `
. . ' 1.K10GE d M10RR15 LLC -^ � I � • .. � - �' �
. � � � \
� � . ��. ,, � � � � � a �� � . �' ,
birl�3' �' - i �� . B°� I' i 1 1 \�.\ �� / \ e •.�.�.�.,��so
/ ii�; _`��. _ _�,_ . .�` � , ' _ .. ... � .. i .. .�. � / - - .
:a` . � � � ' , - .82�� i
!- 01.� - � . "��I� _ . � / '�� • ' � r / � � ,�- . . . -' �,` ` ' /
\`� � � � ' i. .�' - � � . I . � �\ � � , .
\� �� � _ �� _ - .- ' �g1'' . r*.r � � • l .. � •�K; / � J —
• \
I EONMJtD& T�.16kR Cd R1C � a - UM1f On a61U11h�MGlpY►� r . . - � . .. . � . • �r . ``: ' ^ � \ � I �. NAPCY TRA1L FARMS LLC �
� _ �. . %� . '`!' . . ���'� � � _� 1. . / .�' • � . �' . � � •��T��i i„ •
`1t. :�'� r� • .� . . r.. . �• Y f _ ��.` Y -� . � .
',' � . �� . .. `_ �. � �' � � '
� F ' . 1 - . ' • � � " � �-� * � "` ' -
g •� �� - �� - - - - - �,.. . �'-�- - - -- ..�/:
_ �- � . . . - � r , �� -
' . - `�� .s• Y,+��►�C � �� + � • - -- - -
.
� .
�
-- -"� -� � � � � \ \ �
\ --, � ��� � � �,� \ � �' � f_' �` _ ^�.
`� ` ``� " � - 1 �`� , .,` , `� `�F� .`` �- - �`'"�-�� ` �� \� �_ �-� `--__ �• ` - ` - �_= - _ ` " r _ � . - .
-. - -.� � ��-- `--- _ ` _ ' - - _\-_ � _ _ -�` �_� �`_`` � -�� �� \ _ `` ` '�-` '`_` \ �''_,•-.c � � �-__ `,._ -�"`��� _-a' � � .��--?
� -� - . - , ��= - - _- _ � _ � �� � � -r ' ` -� -._ .- >.�1 :�� - .
\,'` _ _� �� � �` ` ' -'-- _ ' _ ' __ �� - _ ' - � � _ �� . __ -`� - � - � __ ` j- �- _ '- - - . � � _ - � - ^ - , ' `
; � : � ` --_ ' � _ , _ _
... . � ` - �_..
, - . � , , � � � - - ' � - , `- , - -
�,,;• , . � -, �. - � � � - _ , - -_ � -_ ' ' - - , - - - � - - - -� - - � _ _ � - - _
, � _ - __ � _
�
••���,\. ` - _ � - �- _ � . \ . -� _` _ �''_� _-` -``��'-�� - �_ ' � `� �� ` �\ -� �_'�'` �'\� `'`�� 1` -� _ _ -\`' __„ __ > � � _ `
. __ _
- -, � , _ ` � ���`�� ` ` __ ��` `� ` _
T� - ` �� _
,
�, _ ' : G._-. \ ' -\ -' . � .. � __ � _ `� � _ �.`�`^`\ `` `� ` '` . �� ' �``` � � � ``_ � � ��_�.`'` � �T. _-_ _ .
�� � � -� _ __ � - _ _ _ _ \`\ �` � � � `��`'� _ _ .. `\ \ � � �. �^. � �`` � � - � `_ 1_ _- -- - _ �
�-� ' _ - \ - _ T_ � ` `-- ` ` `•'`�����`� ` ~� _`� '\'\ �`���_'\ _� ` - ` ``` ` �`� • `/ ' � �� _ -' `���
i� ''�. ~ `\ � � -..�� � - - ` �`� .� � �` � �-� ` 1�� � �� `` �� ` \ �`_ . .• . ` . ``�. , i -, \ . � ` l � � `. \ ��� ,
�` ',= _ �� , � `�- ', `,� ` ti ` `�,`��`�_ \ `` �\___�`��`\.````,�,`= ��'\ ` �'� ``���```� `�'`` � ,``�`\ � -,_/ �-�
`` - ' �� � _� . 7'�. ���_ ��... _'`� �...�` ��_� _�\ � __ -``�- '�\ � i ' `�`\ �� �` �` '1 �''- ` '-.� '__� ` ` '-� � �'��-"�� �`��� _�� �'
"�_ _ . ' ,�' ' ,l� \ ' � �-�' ^�� \ `` `` \ ��` ` _- �_`� � � _� �1+�\� � - � -� ` '— ..� ��_ - \` -�� ��. �=`` \ � �_�'�_ �, �`�_ \ `.
_ ` `` _� -. ...� -�` \ _ -•�� � ��_ � \ � �1_ \` '�� `_ _ -__ ' '` t � � _ � \_` :\� ``� � � °_ � � � � - � �r
�_` -_ ��.. � ,., _ �'�� � � �- .�, `\ �- �,` � _' � �`��'`= ' ��, �� �'�_�-� �� \�_� `'` � ' -__ � . �- _�� _ � - - `� _°�.�`�`��`� \ �•"- � .. -` ���_ �- ``�� �_\ � ''-- �:
� - - ' \ _� ' _ . _ _ ` . - �� ��� , -_� _ ` '�� �-- '\. \. ��� ' , - -� . -- \ ' _ - � _. - '-�_ � �_ _, �_ _ � x -- . �'`�`� _�� _ - �.._` � _ ` -. `-�.
� � �� . _ -. _ -. _ _
� _ � '
_ � - �
-- _ �� ��. �.. -., .� ` - . _ ` � ,�. �. _ . .
._ -_ _ . -_ ; _ � _
'--_� - - � _ - - - �_ - - , - _ - _ __ , - _ --_ --_ - _ , - _ . � _ _ �� � -. �- - ' � '� � -_ _ _
--' � '-- � '�-• ��-- �,` � . _ - �- � ` � __ _ -` _ � `' , _ _. - _ .. . _ - - _. . -- .. .. _ . _.. - _ . .. ` - ` �_` ` `' ` `- ` ' � � � � ` ` ``��
- '- � _ - __ _ _ _
f � _
_ ` —
_ - �-_ -�_ -� -_ —_ � _ - - _ _ _ __' _� _ � __ ��
_, ` ` _ , _ +
� �
, ti � M
. . ` � q�°� BRAUD.YELL EDITN LEE \. NqPPV iHAIL PAHMS l l C .. � � � ': � � ``
-- . _ Qa�i
aiiT COUNtv
b1f1�3 � ' ' � +!�/�ft.essa�:�r

NOTES
LEGEND
� a,000sea CeMenine
� MatcM1lines
Contours
— � — Sill Fen<c
- ... - Super SiX Fence
— DivarsnnT¢rtace
— cel8ountlary
Ec�m
a cw.�n
DncM1
— a�o„p
aroeosea swnia aeiocauon
• MDDEntry.Exii
-��� GoirFiitei0uiiet
fy Soil Boring
Permarrerrc Eaumem
� E�Ira Temp WoM1Space
QLimrts ol Dis[urpancc
� Consiruefwn Enteanee
� ��e P��
_ r�ma e��aqe
�ff- weua�a
sons
REVISIONS REFERENCE DRAWINGS
MO DATE DESCRi�TI[JN ENG DRAWN � CHK ORAWING NO TITLE
A 02/10/2014 ISSUED fOR CONSTRUCTION NF S�
jjj� �d�l Piedmont
�RS �o�PO�a��o� . Non^ �a�o���a N a t u ra I G a s
Nortli Ca�olina LiCPnSP # C-2243
URS JOB NO. 3991113� LINE 43 REPLACEMENT PROJECT
CLIENT JOB NO 2739066 404/401 PERMIT PLAN
FROM STATION 103+00 TO STATION � 37+00
DRAWN BV'. CHECKED BV' APPROVED 8Y: SCALE�.
NF SF DC 1"=60'
DATE- DRAWING NO�. SHEET 5 OF 9 REv
02/10/2014 43-USACE-004 A

.�r.�� -• �...00
165.00
�{"� .s _ � �. . -. .. .�����-,.o
�,,,/°" � o �o. _ .�
;� , , ;:
,:.s.a .�= . �.. . t i,i,�:
�6�. t r Y
`G: . . I - . .. . . _ -f 4 �
t58.N �w.✓•. . __. .
?� . .00 ,r-'�^'��� � � , .
y�t . . `°�".�' -y ,�"! �
. Z F � . �4v�' �* � `.t�'�� W
m�. - . � �r : . , -- . , .._- oe.
� } , - ; � �"h�'", .- , � �,� ,�?
� . . '/ " � . }- � ��69�UU .:
. . O - . y ': _ � � � . . }
J - /� � J�.�� 'M1�S�� l \
� �. . . " ' Y - Y ~•. ._ � _ .. I{1
..i�' ♦ . �J' ./.1 � >
• l � � - r• - ..� ' � ` 1 . ', . �
", . OCB �.%.- 'OCB ��y- c //,''��
�e.w�� '. i' _ . . _ !-.�. � �f ' �.
`
� ' �
• _ --� , ,- rt1L', '+y' � �'r `�Y � � .
c' - - i� �
�q r- =��:r�� ',
l'3? - I
''} �. -R'
z ��f � , - .!?: � -� - - "i �,� i
lAi F "� . ',.
w` �� I
_ ,� +
,z � � � "_ _ _ �,M, � �
_ � � z . k� �' ��
_ z,� � ��.
��
, � ° .���,..
�,. ,6,.� . - '' � . - �� ��y ,.
, � �i
�' _ .:� : ' � yt�. -
� I '
,�u.�o +'�•n� _�.�.�;, ��.��;- y
� � o
� � _- ' -t� - .00 .. . o
� � �
i� . 4, �
-�. ,D ':y._: ,
� � .. �� .� � ►
l�,,.�o �°`� - � �, —= '� e
�. r''` _ * . � � "
� . � , . . `�,.�'� � ' . �
' 1� � �. y uar , y.�
.� /'_ . _� .. o so en i �
3�5�i.; v ,�'. �P , E F��� . r'
�.
NOTES LEGEND REVISIONS REFERENCE DRAWINGS I —I�''y� y
� P�oposeeCCrne�line � MOCEniry�Erit NO DATE DESCRiPTION ENG DRAWN CHN I DRnWINGNO TITIE � � I PI��A1 I IO�I.
so�i eorcroNiei A 02/102014 ISSUED FOR CONSTRUCTION NF SF II URS Corporaoon � North Carolina
��;o�°.' ti �9 � '� �� Natural Gas
--- sn� F���e Pe,ma�m Fasame�i . . _ , _ Noro, �a�oi��a ���e�se a ��a�3
�- — - -
-...-s„oe,s,uF�„« �'j E���aTemow��xav=Ce iurtS�oeNO as9nias LINE43REPLACEMENTPROJECT
—o�.e�za�r�,�a« Q ��mnsoio�s���e��« , _ . . _ ',CUENT�oBNO znvoes 404I40'IPERMITPLAN
— Pa��� eoun��� 0 c°^�"°°'"" E""'"°� � . . - . . . '� . FROM STATION '137+00 TO STATION '174+00
�,m
�, -:i' e�« a � . . . . .
a a.��n -� __ _
, ou�n � Temo Breqe � � - i � I DRAWN BV. CHECKED BY� � APPROVED BV SCALE
I �/ �/: weia�a �I . . . _ . NF SF DC �.. _ 60'
���� �DATE� DRAWINGNO SHEET 6 OF g uEv
, oiw.eo.,w.�icReio�ano� s���s I � � � � ' '. OZri012014 43-USACE-005 A

�0.� �
� �
�1B•G0� �.�
�,
�`�.�� <f..'' .. � �f � � �- - -e
� r7�f ` �J � �� .�' -
� ,���� '!n - � / $ _ �t% - . �'�° �+i�� �'�\
1 .� . �T4
�� ` � � , . � . . '
�` � J �
`� r. `
`r �, � �`,, `� ' `� r _,-� � �r-�,a„
.dr '�� ti- "� � `� '
•,. � . .,� �. ,s-:
�:, i • .. � ,� ;� f ' ; . � � ��-
li: �,R�,� �i �j' � ��
�� �: � � . � L..
�,�. � .\ ��_
.� � � _ �
1 �
',X ,y�- � ` :. � ., ., � h
� � . p_� l�., •'� ,�.:, _i . +'r{
��. _, . f•�4'i ''0° �' � . '
-�� `
, . � ..cc.� .
�� �
- - ��l �' �� � ��.00',
� 1r `� 1�� ,�K'
_ ��-lfQ- . � -
,� . ,z.ao
- � `� ^� -� .�'�;�
. � , ."` �Y � ` , , � ,' S ' '�
i� . �" �� ,
�
°'" � , ^ ���� ,
8.04 � \
' i �� �G� O IS �- t. ���.'� �
� ;� . - s
. D=1 - - '�, y� �� j �.
..� I ��'�� fS � I�
'� . � `,� � "�"'�. � �k�,�..
� t � \
i �. � � �r � � "� -.�
a'
�, ?,� ExA :
,- �
i.. � _,j , ..
;i * - ' ti I _ . ��� a•.
_ �� � ' 1� . ��� ._�.
,� t 50r%, : `-� • -
� '�� � t _ : � ��,,�
d' � D-2 �`:'I.�^ t
rP`�.:�� � J,�. � } ' �.
� �
�
�
,�
a
��' .
� n
\�
•
3G GO 120
Feet
..,''�`.,- - .
NOTES LEGEND REVISIONS REFERENCE DRAWINGS
_ - -- - � - -- -- . — - -- - -- � �O '
� Proposed CeMen�ne � MD� [n�ry�E. � NO DFTE DESCR vT nN ENG �RAWN CHN pR4WING NG TITLE _ � � P i ed m o n t
— rnairn�es :�. co�Fnc�ou�ei ' A 02/102014 ISSUEDFORCONSTRUCTION NF SF � �
CoMOUrs �j So eor ne � � - � � URS Cor�poranon NorM� Garol na N a t u ra I G a s
Nor�h G ol na L�cense 4 C 2.'4"i
- � — Sill Fence PermarcM Easemenl � - ' � � � �
- �� - s�pe,s�uFe�« �j E*�,�t�mowoMSCa=e � � � �, � URS.IOenlo 399iii38 � LINE 43 REPLACEMENT PROJECT
—o��e«a�T=�a« Q �,m�so�o����,��« , � , , . cueN7�oeNO. naeoss� 404/401PERMITPLAN
— Parce�BOUnCary �p�Emrance
� �,m � ��^s���< FROM STATION �74+00 TO STATION 8+�0.25
cm,en �,,:... e�,� an , . . � . . ��
s �.�,� _ rc��� e��aqe � - � � DRAWN BY� CHECKED BV APPROVED BY SCALE
� we��,�a � . �. NF SF DC 1.� - 60'
Ao�,�a s,+ai.r a�io�aia�, sons � I DATE' DRAWING NO. SHEET 7 Of g REV q
02/10/2014 43-USACE�006

_1� �
►� _ -� �
�
�_
f :�, �
�.�. ---:.� �` �,,�_���
�� - '''�'�-'�.�.
� �i
( { �� , � �.11'j �Y1� -�? �.. • � 1��ti . �i �.' .� _ _
�R. Y^ i} � `d � -'y � � ., , . Y
1� � },4 } %. f`i' 3i� .. ��• I - ._�y -� y4„ �
� �yt� y� � ��i Sj . � + I �'_ t l� I �L, a Y I . . . �.
. -i�� _:'�a` '�' '' _
� - . f. rS ' ti4� . ' _ _ t, Y. . _ l-��F . ���..
-+-u�� . _ . . .. .. _. � � �� D•12� ` .. �r ` �,i�� �����' � � .i
. . _ ' 1�'. .. . � .r-���
� �:.� � � - _ " _ � _ . . . -. _ ' I = ' I r"1}. � K . .
' �.CO__ _
" ' '=` �� ^ � �� �?� .
� r" ' -� ._.. . ` . .. _y �- v
' '
. � i . .. . � - • 11[ �"��--��,., � � ' �
�
_. _�i<_ �"�-��� � � ,
{ � �-_ � f_ .,Q. � Y, y�„
r , � r. . �T �� _ -- _ . �� � � �.. J��r��pi.
- j A. � I :-' . - � .) � � .�� , �
. c I J� `' �H �'� "7� � �' ; �� ! `{ � 1 i � �
,� I !c —� �; �
, _ _ . � , , , ,,,, _ �
�� .i : ,� �:
t i _ � �,
• . � �.
I i �; �� � 1�! y �
�� . I _ , . .. � ' y t ; ' �7 ` � � ' '
f-
� .,�� �,�; � � _ � ��
� �� �
.� � ��-
, > � � � — __ -. -- - �� _ , �
CiTY,GATE 1��� -_ -
~�Jr—= a, .
.. ExA , � ti r � �.� �
a � �'
.. ,d �� } ` iri � . � �� ' � _ � !�
��,�- _' _. _ �1��.._ ...i!��r.ar�:, 'li.' �, --,t a
. ,. �� �
n �' �
� . :tl , � J . . .. �
Y� . . �r
. '� - ... ' - �� . . _ _. ��
� � i !� �
' � �� � ��
Z
: � . � �. . .��, �
�� . . ..� �.�• i �
_" �R ( '�
� -� I t
.�,' � � �i
�_- �
F '�
�
; �
� � J
� �
.:� _ SBd, _ - "�'si�lp'�`#��
�
' � � ���� : �a �5
� .j . _ . . C9. L., .'�� ,. ,. .. ' _ . -
�'.Y + .� �� �T 5 � �.�'-� � �_��'��; � 'r . .
�. � ,� �,,,�,+� ,� "'� — ,�
� ,.�
� �"� .��' t:r � -- ��- ,.- "
�. � .
� �
1 ` .p� M y�,ti' ;� _•� �-- ^-.'�.�,�, -
. , r-�� , . . _ {� �� �, � .i �. ' -
�, t.�' ,g `�=` ExA ` - ,. �
-' ~V.�7' � � • ..���*' ,:�' � � � .
�4r ;� w' ..,� , : ,.
-�° _ y. �w y' �,� t , � '� 'r�
, � '� � : �r � - `"". ` � ti. �1 � : , 1
�c' [_r-_ . . . � . _ _
�j � ,7� � _. ' " ,
�' � '
._ r.i�
- r=�,
�- r _ y
��
�
�
LAYDOWN YARD
►'�� �--�� ' � - . " '` .
� � �,' �. �-�•_•�•f _ --- . �...i.�.+..�.r�:�= ia.�.�..-r---� , , _ .� ._� - . � 1
, ���.. -: -� ---,:���_�
�.�.� �, .
NOTES LEGEND
� PropouaCemenine � nDDEn�ry�Eai�
�. � Malc�lines �� Coir FillerOullel
Conlours �j So�i Bonng
- ' - Silt Fente Perma�nl Easemen�
-. - s�oe� src ce��e � e.o-a remo wo�sw«
— o��e�son-eRacc� Q �mnzo�o�s���ea�ce
— Parcel Bounaary � Cens�ructnn Ent�ence
��m
� c��.�,� �,r<; eo,�P��
DncF - TcinP Britlpe
, �%/- v���,�d
.ccFCO�..�i.,.�. so�
.---- -- -
�+ .
.�_ . "` �
- � �8
a �o
C __,_,�f*!:�"��yr.r;
�'-- •r''�'
�:
�� ��
�y�
* ; 4
Ai
r�� i r
:�;�����
�
:� w
�-_'- `
_ � ��
�� -
_ ��n
,`,
�"� _ � `. .'�,, 7�
_ �a� ` " - ' _ _ � ��
:� ,; , -_ _ � - � „ �,�.
�� �; - - .- . - -.
� � � _ -_. � � --. , . ,
�� �� = - - .- �_ � . - � � �j"-.--�' �
� _ - �.,,. f
�"` y ,r .. � � _ _,� ��„ � --�" :
i-'�.' ..� + ��'"� - - 4, � � � �~ . �ai'. k lr
r ' �,�' r
_� N �
� i � �r � 1 � e
�� .
��.�
..-+- . � t I � �i�. � _� .. � � � �`,. - �� ', �,
!�_�, j; � , ��
� � �• �! = �_ j
�. ' ..:-, � �` � . ,
, , � �, �, ,�
,; , .. . ,` �G,� '�
:`� ; -.��� � ""r;n, � . ''P� ��� �t ..r��
-. N
��-,.�
� ��� �, � �
�w�� , �
� : � --
��
.
,�:: - V�,•��..w�
REVISIONS REFERENCE DRAWINGS
''�i NO DATE OESCFiPTipN ENG DRAWN CHK DPFIMNG NO _ _ _ 11TLE —� � �O�' P i ed m o n t
A 0 211 012 0 7 1 ISSUED FOR CONSTRUCTION NF SF
� �RS�o,,,o,a��o� Nort��a,o��a Natural Gas
Noiri� Carolina License tl C-224?
ruRS�oeNO ae9nise LINE 43 REPLACEMENT PROJECT
,
�, CLIENT J08 NO. 2739066 404/40i PERMIT P�N
FROM STATION 0+00 TO STATION 4+57.94
� � � � � � DRAWN BV- CHECKED BV APPROVED 8Y SCALE.
. . , . NF SF DC �"' 6a� I
. . DATE� DRAWING NO SHEET 8 OF g aev
02110R014 43-USACE�007 _ H I

NOTES
� a�oro:eac�me���
— Malch nes
- — Sil1 FenGe
-. - SuDeiS�XFen�:e
— o��e�:o�re�a«
— P�a'ce18owaary
on�n
� ee sw�i� eem�nuo�
LEGEND I REVISIONS
0o e rv.e �\ . , . � r+o onrE oesceiPrioN
��� c Fix o i l E�,,,..,�, „ � q 02/102014 ISSUED FOR CONSTRUCTION
�1 5 Ba rq
Permaner'AEasemeM � .
� Ex�2?emp WorksDace � �
a�mrts oi Dis�uieance I . .
� ConsliuclronEnt�a�rc'e , . ,
t:?,:,-..r: ao,� a:� . . .
- TemO BriOge �
✓//, v�e�w�a
sons
REFERENCE DRAWINGS
_. ENG DHAWN CM� DRAWINGNO _ TITLE __ I �
NF SF URS Cor t on � No�m Caroi na
� . 'I . I por3
North Carol na L cense a G-: 243
� ' - � URS JOB NO 39911138
� CLIEN7 JOB NO 2739066
r�Piedmont
j,� Natural Gas
--_ _. __.__ _ _— _
LINE 43 REPLACEMENT PROJECT
404/40'1 PERMIT PLAN
WET�AND IMPACT FIGURE �
DRAWN BV CHECKED BY APPROVED BV SCALE�.
NF SF DC
DATE'. DRAWING NO SHEET 9 OF 9
02i1012074 43-USACE-008
i' = 60'
a[v
A