20071313 Ver 1_401 Application_20070801

Robert J. Goldstein and Assoc"•iates, Inc.
FNVIRONMEN VAL CONSUL FANTS
1221 Corporation Parkway, Sultc 100 .Since IQ85 Tcl. (919) S72-1 174 or (X'00) Raleigh, North Carolina 27610 1 iy (v 11) i I I
c-mail: r?oldstein(ci)RJGAcarolina.com sschsuc vvssvv RJR, L('111
26 July 2007
q7-a313
Mr. Ronnie Smith
US-ACE Wilmington Regulatory Field Office
P.O. Box 1890
Wilmington, NC 28402-1890
Re: PCN for Harnett County South-Central Sewerline & WWTP
Dear Mr. Smith,
Attached is a Section 404-401 PCN and supporting documents for stream and wetland
impacts that will result from construction of Harnett County's proposed gravity sewerline, pump
station, force main, and Little River wastewater treatment plant in south-central Harnett County
near Spring Lake, NC. A NEPA EA for this project was reviewed by USDA and DENR and
issued a FONSI, which should adequately address DWQ's concerns regarding secondary and
cumulative impacts of the project. This PCN application package includes the following items:
1) PCN application form (I 1 pages)
2) Agent authorization letter from Harnett County (1 page)
3) NC-EEP In-Lieu Fee Acceptance Form (I page)
4) EA-FONSI sign-off letters (3 pages)
5) ACOE and DWQ stream assessment forms (3 pages)
6) ACOE Wetland Data Forms (8 pages)
7) Figures 1 - 6h (23 pages)
8) JD Form (8 pages)
Please contact me if you have any questions about the jurisdictional delineations, or contact
engineers Hirarn Marziano and Charlie McGougan at 336-629-3932 iCyou have yucstions ahout
construction or design issues.
Sincerely,
Gerald Pottern
AUG I -_2007
[e-mail] tMDW
.ANCH
cc: Ms. Cyndi Karoly, DWQ
(7 copies, excluding ACOE JD Form, plus S200. application fee check).
NEPA & SEPA Environmental Documents. EA, EIS, CE • /urisdictional Wetland & .SIrcam liii/%er l)c-lowulimm • 404 - 401 Pcc mils • (;LC (,l'S Alnl)p1m, • if w
Qunlin Studies •Strcam & Wctlnnd Mitigation and Rcstorntion • lin?/nn,?crcr/ Jjn ties Sur tree • Hiolo,icvll . h,w.,. me llb & ( on,crrallon /'/un> • II ell, blwl,, ,s
Reservoirs • Water Lines & Treatment Plants • SeWPPlineS & Wasicivatel l/calment • lnslream l Im, ,Ino/r.sec • l/1lerhaml hons/c/ ( cl Illirancs • II all r,h,
Assessmcnl & Management •Archoeological Surveps and Telling • Phase l Nile Assecsmcn is 0 l'ark.r N (irecnirnrs Phllinin?, 0 ( It Ml Gram :Ippln alcrun
Office Use Only: 1 01 111 v-'crsion v0%CIl11lCl
USACE Action ID No. DWQ No.
(It any particular item is not appucar)ie to mis prolect, piccl,,u rutci No, ?wl,,, ,im-
I. Processing
Q 7- 1 3 1 3
1. Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
® Section 404 Permit ? Riparian or Watershed Buffer RUIeS
? Section 10 Permit ? Isolated Wetland Permit from D",'Q
® 401 Water Quality Certification ? Express 401 Water Quality Certification
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit (s) Requested: NWP-12 (sewerline and effluent
discharge pipe) and NWP-39 (pump station and wastewater treatment plant sites)
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certi lication
is not required, check here: ?
4. If payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) is proposed
for mitigation of impacts, attach the acceptance letter from NCEEP, complete section A111.
and check here: ® (EEP Request Form copy attached; response pending)
5. If your project is located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on page
4), and the project is within a North Carolina Division of Coastal Management Area of
Environmental Concern (see the top of page 2 for further details), check here:
II. Applicant Information
AU G I - .2007
1. Owner/Applicant Information
Name: Harnett County Public Utilities DENR-WATER WALITY
Mailing Address: Rodney Tart Director
308 West Duncan Street { or: PO Box 1119 }
Lillin-ton NC 27546
Telephone Number: 910-893-7575 Fax Number: 910-893-6643
E-mail Address: rtart(c?harnett.org -
2. Agent/Consultant Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter
must be attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name, Company: engineer: Charlie McGougan, P.E. Marziano & Minier, PA
Mailing Address: 147-A Dublin Square Rd., Asheboro, NC 27203
E-mail /Tel/Fax/: cmcgougan a marziano-mcgougan.com /336-629-3931 /629-3932
Name, Company: wetland consult: Gerald Pottern, Robert .1 Goldstein & Assoc
Mailing Address: 1221 Comoration Pkwy suite 100, Raleigh NC 27610
E-mail /Tel/Fax/: gpotternn?rjgacarolina.com /919-872-1 174 /872-9214
Updated 11/1/2005
South Central I larnett Co sc\?ci & (\ ?\ I P
Page 5 of 15

III. Project Information
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion_
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purpt>srs_ the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than I 1 by 17-inch I'ormat:
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans arc
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be inlormed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of project: South Central Harriett County 24" Interceptor Pump Station & W WTP
2. T.I.P. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only): NA
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN): W WTP prop # 0524-91-2707.000
4. Location
County: Harnett Nearest Town: Spring Lake (Cumberland Co)
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number): NA
Directions to site (include road numbers/names, landmarks, etc.): The 24" gravity sewer
will extend from Rainey Drive (SR 1147) east of Lake McKay southeastward 2.3 miles along
an unnamed stream crossing Rambeaut Road (SR 1 124) and NC 210, ending at the pump
station site on Shady Grove Rd (SR 2050) 0.8 mile east of NC-210. near the
Harnett/Cumberland county line. The force main will extencl from the pump st,tiio !i sitc? I
miles eastward along the south edge of SR 2050 to the 1-ittlc Rivcr W\V H) site. I he AI.
corner of the WWTP site is 0.2 mile west of Shady Grove Rd (SR 2050) and Elliott Brid??c
Rd (SR 2045) intersection. The 52 acre WWTP property is 960 feet wide along Shady Grovc
Rd and extends southward 2,600 feet to the north bank of Little River where the effluent \% ill
discharge.
5. Site coordinates (For linear projects, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that
separately lists the coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
Decimal Degrees (6 digits min): wwtp - 35.2330 "N, 78.8849 "W; see also attached list.
6. Property size (acres): WWTP prop = 52 acres PS prop--_ I acre, (Iraq-ity sc\\ er I I
feet Force main = 12,600 feet.
7. Name of nearest receiving body of water: (Lower) Little River.
8. River Basin: Cape Fear River, DWQ sub-basin 03-06-14 (Lower Little River)
updated I I'I'200S
.'I11Uf11 ( entI;)I I larncu ( '' ' c" 'I A "" I I'
I?a?,r 0 of I
(Note - this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at htt?%h2o.enr.statc.nc.us?admin.maps!.)
Describe the existing conditions on the site and general Iand use in the vicinity ol' tlIC I)I-01 cl
at the time of this application: The proposed W WTP property is predominantly loblolly
pine plantation with pines mostly 6 to 11 inches dbh, and an understory of red maple,
sweetgum black gum sourwood water oak inkberry, sweet pepperbush, blueberries, and
other shrubs and trees typical of cutover mesic flatwoods. The southern most portion adjacent
to Little River and other areas along property edges contain natural mixed hardwood and pine
forest with canopy trees 12 to 20 inches dbh. A petroleum pipeline lies along the eastern
property boundary and traverses the southern part of the property 500 feet north of the river.
Adjacent properties are forested agricultural, and residential. The pump station property
contains fallow field and mixed pine/hardwood forest. The gravity sewer and force main
corridors traverse a mix of forested cutover, agricultural, roadside, and residential lands.
10. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used: The 24-
inch diameter gravity sewerline will be installed by open trenching in a 40-foot wide
construction corridor (total corridor area = 11.0 acres), which will be cleared using timber
harvesting equipment and bulldozer. Seven proposed stream crossings range from 10 to 35
feet wide. Erosion will be minimized at stream crossings using portable dams and pumping
to de-water a short segment of stream bed for a few hours during trenching and pipe laying.
Directional boring at stream crossings is not be feasible due to the precise pipe gradient
required. The gravity sewer corridor will also cross eight wetland areas totalling 0.2395 acre
(temporary and permanent wetland impacts combined). The pipe will be installed and stream
banks and wetlands restored in accordance with applicable NWP-12 and GWQC-3374
conditions regarding riparian buffer protection, crossing angle, pipe joint locations, herbicide
and fertilizer use, rip-rap placement, erosion control, stabilization and seeding, anti-seep
collars and other US-ACE and NC-DENR requirements. The pump station and its access
road will require clearing 1.0 acre, mostly forested, including 0.1740 acre of wetland. The
24-inch ductile iron wastewater force main will be installed alongside SR 2050, requiring
minor new land clearing and no stream or wetland impacts. The WWTP facilities, access
road and effluent outfall will requiring clearing 17.5 acres (mostly pine plantation) on the
southern half of the 52 acre WWTP property. Beginning at the northwest property corner on
SR 2050. the 18-foot wide WWTP access road will extend 1,400 feet southward just inside
the western property line. The 24-inch force main and a 4-inch diameter potable w?ltcr main
will parallel this road. The WWTP buildings and treatment facilities will occupy 14.0 acres
north of the east-west gasline. This area -includes a man-made ditch wetland 6 feet by 800
feet (.1102 acre) that will be filled. The effluent outfall will cross the gasline, extend 200
feet southward to a cascade aerator, then another 400 feet southward to the discharge point
on the north bank of Little River. There is no stream or wetland crossing in the 40-foot wide
effluent outfall corridor. The discharge pipe will be flush with the river bank, disturbing not
more than 0.0092 acre of river channel below ordinary high water. The river bank will be
stabilized with rock and native vegetation in accordance with NWP 12 and GWQC 3374
conditions. Construction equipment to be used will include bulldozer, rubber tired excavator,
and pipe-laying equipment.
Updated 11/1/2005
South ('cntIaI I IaInCIt (o 1)v\ r & V\ \\I P
Page 7 of 15
11. Explain the purpose of the proposed work: South-central Harnett County's population has
grown substantially during the past decade and this trend is expected to continue, due lardy
to the importance of Fort Brae as a major military training and staging facility. Past
development has relied mainly on septic systems which are becoming less feasible as the
region becomes more urbanized To prevent water quality and health problems associated
with septic system failures Harnett County plans to make central wastewater collection and
treatment available to serve existing and new development as soon as possible. This will ,Ilso
accommodate more densely clustered developmennt that will provide more efficient Use oi ihic
land and require less land clearing and less impervious surface per capita. (The proposcd
collection system serving the Jumping Run and Twin Lakes areas west of Rainey Drip c \\ III
be designed and permitted separately).
IV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits ,uid
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued 11CI111 _
certifications or other useful inforn-iation. Describe previously appro??cd \v.ctland, stream mid
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules. No previous 404/401 permits requested for this or related project.
V. Future Project Plans
Are any future permit requests anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated work,
and provide justification for the exclusion of this work fi-om the current application.
The proposed collection system serving the lumping Run and Twin Lakes areas west ofl' Rainc\
Drive will be designed and permitted separately. Construction of the WWTP and pump station
needs to begin as soon as possible as they are more complex and time-consuming to build then
the upstream collection system.
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. Each impact must he
listed separately in the tables below (e.g., culvert installation should be listed separately 1-1-om
riprap dissipater pads). Be sure to indicate if an impact is temporary. All proposed impacts.
permanent and temporary, must be listed, and must be labeled and clearly identifiable on an
accompanying site plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial)
should be shown on a delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems.
Wetland and stream evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate.
Photographs may be included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for
Updated 11,1'2005
SO Lit h (?Clltfal I IaI11CIt (?0 S0vCI & \\ \\ I P
Pa-e 8 of I
wetland or stream mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional
space is needed for listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
Provide a written description of the proposed impacts: The gravity scwerlinc vv III critas
portions of wetlands MA GA U T S R Q and P totalling 0.2395 wetland acre. A 40 foot
wide construction corridor will be cleared O and the 24" interceptor pipe installed by
trenching The trench will be backfilled with stockpiled native soil, pre-construction
contours restored and the corridor stabilized with appropriate native and/or annual
,groundcover. The permanent sewer easement will be 20 feet wide, but the permanent rno\,\ed
access corridor in segments crossing wetlands will be limited to 10 feet wide. The only
permanent impact to these wetlands will be conversion of 0.0740 acre from forest/scrub
vegetation to an herb/low scrub community in the 10-foot wide maintenance corridor.
Wetland GP on the pump station site (0.1740 acre) and 800 feet of wetland DC (Ditch C) on
the WWTP site (0.1102 acre) will be permanently filled and graded. Acreages of each
wetland impact type are listed below. Stream crossings 1 through 7, ranging from 10 to 35
feet wide will also be installed by trenching. Directional boring is not be feasible due to the
precise pipe gradient required. Erosion will be minimized at stream crossings using portable
dams and pumping to de-water a short segment of stream bed for a few hours during
trenching and pipe laying. The two streams crossing Shady Grove Road are piped where they
cross the force main corridor- the force main will be installed under or over these pipes
without impacting these streams. Effluent outfall construction on the north bank of Little
River will disturb not more than 40 x 10 feet (0.0092 acre) of river channel below ordinary
high water. The river bank will be stabilized with rock and native vegetation in accordamcc
with NWP 12 and GWQC 3374 conditions.
2. Individually list wetland impacts. Types of impacts include, but are not limited to
mechanized clearing, grading, fill, excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams,
separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding.
Wetland
Impact
Site Number

Type of Impact
Type of Wetland
(e.g., forested, marsh, Located
within
100-year Distance to
Nearest
Str
m Area of Impact
(acres)
(indicate on
map) herbaceous, bog, etc.) Floodplain
(yes no ) ea
(linear feet) Temp Perm
MA, fig 6a 30' temp clear, perm mow 10' forest/shrub - contig yes 90 ft 0.00114 U 0000
GA, fig 6b 30' temp clear, perm mow 10' forest/shrub - contig yes 75 ft 0,0040 0 0U? ,
U, fig 6c 30' temp clear, perm mow 10' forest/shrub - contig yes 60 ft 0.0137 0.0069
T, fig 6d 30' temp clear, perm mow 10' forest/shrub - contig yes 35 ft 0.0490 0.02 ?6
S, fig 6d 30' temp clear, perm mow 10' forest/shrub - contig yes 50 ft 0.0622 0.0273
R, fig 6e 30' temp clear, perm mow 10' forest/shrub - contig yes SO ft 0.0072 0.0014
Q, fig 6f 30' temp clear, perm mow 10' forest/shrub - contig yes >100 ft 0,0208 O OoX9
P. fig 617 30' temp clear. perm mo%y 10' fOlestishrnh - contig ?.? =loo it 00040 1 it UU! r?
GP, rig 6g permanent fill and grade lorest"shrub - contig 45 It
i
DC, fig 6h permanent fill and grade ditch in foicst - conti(u, nu
Updated 11/1/2005
SOLI Ill ( CI ursl I I.IIIICt; ( I, 'I,1?,l .A V, I: -
Page 9 of 15

Total Wetland to be Cleared : Vegetation Change Only; No Topographic Impact 0.1655 0.0-740
Total Wetland to be Filled and Graded : Wetland Eliminated --- 0.2842
Total All Types of Impacts, Temporary and Permanent = 0.5237 acre 0.1655 0.3582
3. List the total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property: approximately
0.5237 wetland acres in the proposed construction areas (interceptor corridor, pump station_
and WWTP site).
4. Individually list all intermittent and perennial stream impacts. Be sure to identify temporary
impacts. Stream impacts include, but are not limited to placement of fill or culverts, clam
construction, flooding, relocation, stabilization activities (e.g., cement walls, rip-rap, crib
walls, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is proposed.
plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams
must be included. To calculate acreage, multiply length X width, then divide by 43,560.
Stream Impact
Number
(indicate on map)
Stream Name
Type of Impact Peren or
Intermit Average
Stream Width
Before Impact Impact
Length
(linear feet) Area of
Impact
(acrrs)
S-1 fig 4a UT Little River temp sewer trench xing Peren 18 ft 40 0.0165
S-2 fig 4b UT Little River temp sewer trench xing Peren 18 ft 40 0,016;
S-3 fig 4b UT Little River temp sewer trench xing Inter 10 ft 40 0.0092
S-4 fig 4b UT Little River temp sewer trench xing Peren 15 ft 40 0.0138
S-5 fig 4b UT Little River temp sewer trench xing Inter 10 ft 40 0.0092
S-6 fig 4b UT Little River temp sewer trench xing Peren 35 ft 40 0.0321
S-7 fig 4c UT Little River temp sewer trench xing Peren 15 ft 40 0.0138
S-8 fig 5f Little River outfall pipe in bank Peren 90 ft 40 0,009
Total Stream Impact (by length and acreage) 32t1 U I ?(I
5. Individually list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries, sounds, Atlantic
Ocean and any other water of the U.S.). Open water impacts include, but are not limited to
fill- excavation. dredging. flooding. drainage. bulkheads. etc.
Open Water Impact
Site Number
(indicate on map) Name of Waterbody
(if applicable)
Type of Impact Type of Waterbody
(lake, pond, estuary, sound, bay,
ocean, etc.) Area of
Impact
(acres)
none none none none none

Total Open Water Impact (acres)
6. List the cumulative impact to all Waters of the U.S. resulting, from the proiect:
Stream Impact (acres): 0.1203 temp -----
Wetland Impact - Vegetation Impact Only (acres): 0.1655 temp 0.0740 perm
Wetland Impact - Permanent Fill and Grade (acres) ----- 0.2842 perm
t pdal(2d I 1 1 200')
SO Lit h (??!9ural I kIIOCII (0 ')aver & A\ \\ I I'
Pa(-,c 10 of 15
1
Open Water Impact (acres): -----
Total Impact to Waters of the U.S. (acres) 0.2858 temp
Total Stream Impact (linear feet) -'211 11 tcmp
7. Isolated Waters
0.3582 perm
Do any isolated waters exist on the property? ? Yes ? No
Describe all impacts to isolated waters, and include the type of water (wetland or stream) and
the size of the proposed impact (acres or linear feet). Please note that this section only
applies to waters that have specifically been determined to be isolated by the USACE.
All wetlands to be impacted are hydrologically contiguous with perennial or relatively
permanent intermittent streams.
8. Pond Creation
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ? uplands ? stream ? wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.):
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.):
Current land use in the vicinity of the pond:
Size of watershed draining to pond: Cxpected pond surfarc arc,l_
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to prov I&
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts.
The proposed gravity interceptor alignment was selected to be at least 50 Feet from the
parallel stream bank and to avoid stream and wetland crossings wherever practicable, while
minimizing impacts to private property and accommodating sewer service to both sides of the
stream. The selected alignment shown here represents a balance of these constraints. As there
are numerous small floodplain depression wetlands throughout the project vicinity, it is
impossible to avoid them all. No permanent grade changes are proposed in these wetlands. The
force main is routed along a roadside where it will not affect streams or wetlands. Only two
wetlands will be permanently filled: a 0.1740 acre depression wetland on the pump station site
and 0.1102 acre ditch on the WWTP site. Neither of these wetlands appears to have sufficient
pending duration to serve as regular breeding sites for frogs or salamanders, nor do thcv ha\c
high potential value for floodwater storage, pollutant assnidation, stream banl: stabili/.1ti(t11.
wildlife habitat, or recreation based on DWQ evaluation criteria.
Updated 11/1/2005
South ( cntial I Ierncu (n ti???ci ?? AV VA I'
Pagc 11 of 15
VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nation\vide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on January 15, 2002, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCEEP concurrence shall be placed on hold as incomplete.
An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration in DWQ's
Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
http://li2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands/strm?,,ide.html.
Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage'lincar fcct
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
If required, Harnett County proposes to provide compensator mitigation for the permanent
wetland fill impacts (0.2842 acre) by in-lieu fee payment to NC-EEP. A copy of the EEP In-
Lieu Fee Requset Form is attached (response pending). No mitigation is proposed for the
wetland and stream impacts along the sewerline, where no permanent topographic changes
will occur. or the effluent outfall which will be essentially flush with the river bank.
2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement
Program (NCEEP). Please note it is the applicant's responsibility to contact the NCEEP at
[phone] to determine availability, and written approval from the NCEEP indicating
that they are will to accept payment for the mitigation must be attached to this form. For
additional information regarding the application process for the NCEEP, check the NCEFP
website at littp://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/w1-1)/index.litm. If use of the NCEEP is proposed, please
check the appropriate box on page five and provide the following information:
updated 11,1,2005
South ('enuaI IIarncu (o )L\\ C rfi \V V\ I P
Pace 12 of' 15
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet): 0
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet): 0
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): 0.2842 acre
Amount of Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): 0
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres): 0
IX. Environmental Documentation (required by DWQ)
1. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of
public (federal/state) land? Yes ? No ?
2. If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)'.'
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ® No E]
3. If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please
attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter. Yes ? No ?
X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (required by DWQ)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also providc
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
I. Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 213 .0233
(Neuse), 15A NCAC 2B .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 02B .0243 (Catawba) 15A NCAC
2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please
identify V Yes ? No
2. If "yes", identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers.
If buffer mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the
buffer multipliers.
Zone* Impact Multiplier Required
(square feet) Mitiu"atton
1 3 (2 for Cata\vba)
2 1.5
Total
Updated 11/1/2005
South ( cntral I Iarnctl ( 0 'W\\cr & V\ V1 I P
Pafe 13 of 15
* Zone I extends out 30 feet perpendicular from the top of the near bank of channel. Zone 2 extend; an
additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
3. If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e.,
Donation of Property, Riparian Buffer Restoration / Enhancement, or Payment into the
Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as identified
within 15A NCAC 2B .0242 or.0244, or.0260.
XI. Stormwater (required by DWQ)
Describe impervious acreage (existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site. Discuss
stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands downstream from
the property. If percent impervious surface exceeds 20%, please provide calculations
demonstrating total proposed impervious level.
Impervious surface at the pump station will occupy less than 20% of the 1.0 acre site, and
impervious surface at the wastewater treatment plant will occupy less than 20% of the 52 acre
site. The buried gravity sewerline and force main will have no impervious surface area.
XII. Sewage Disposal (required by DWQ)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or dischar(,e) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
The new wastewater treatment plant will will discharge into Little River upstream of Elliott
Bridge Road. Harnett County is also seeking potential reuse customers to receive as much of the
effluent as possible, as discussed in a NEPA EA approved by USDA Rural Utilities and NC-
DENR in August 2006.
XIII. Violations (required by DWQ)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ? No
Is this an after-the-fact permit application? Yes ? No Z
XIV. Cumulative Impacts (required by DWQ)
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in additional
development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality,.) 'i,es ? \,) ?
If yes, please submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analvsis in acc(udance \v 1111
the most recent North Carolina Division of Water Quality policy posted Oil 0111- \,\ChSItC X11
http:l/h2o.enr.state.ne.us/ncwetlands. If no, please provide a short narrative description: I his
wastewater project will serve existing and future development in the Ovcrhills, Twin t_,Ikcs. a11(1
Anderson Creek areas of southern Harnett County and the northern portion of Fort Brit,-, Amin
Reservation. Population growth, wastewater flow projections, and direct and secorndary impacts
are discussed in a NEPA EA approved in August 2006 by USDA Rural Utilities and NC-DENR.
I pdalcd I I. 1 2005
lnulh ( chiral I :irn,u ( „ ",??, & AA 'A I I'
Pa,-,c 14 of I5
XV. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control),
19
Gerald B. Pottern

Applicant/Agent's Signature Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
Digital Longitude & Latitude coordinates of stream and wetland crossings
Wetland Stream Long W Lat N Figure
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
24" Gravity Interceptor, Rainey Drive to Shady Grove Pump Station
Station Feature Jurisdic Impact Latit ON , Longit °W
119+60 --- SR 1147 Rainey Dr --- ---
116+00 Wetland MA 0.0034 ac 35.2369 , 78.9484
112+20 Stream 1, 18 ft wide 18 x 40 ft 35.2366 , 78.9473
105+00 Wetland MB no impact 35.2349 , 78.9467
101+00 Wetland N no impact 35.2346 , 78.9448
90+60 Stream 2, 18 ft wide 18 x 40 ft 35.2325 , 78.9436
87+40 Stream 3, 10 ft wide 10 x 40 ft 35.2318 , 78.9440
78+60 --- SR 1124 Rambeaut Rd --- ---
63+10 Stream 4, 15 ft wide 15 x 40 ft 35.2288 , 78.9380
58+20 Stream 5, 10 ft wide 10 x 40 ft 35.2296 , 78.9367
53+80 --- NC-210 --- ---
52+80 Stream 6, 35 ft wide 35 x 40 ft 35.2295 , 78.9355
47+50 Wetland GA 0.0069 ac 35.2284 , 78.9352
36+20 Wetland U 0.0206 ac 35.2269 , 78.9328
31+80 Stream 7, 15 ft wide 15 x 40 ft 35.2261 , 78.9321
21+50 Wetland T 0.0746 ac 35.2237 , 78.9323
18+00 Wetland S 0.0895 ac 35.2236 , 78.9317
14+80 Wetland R 0.0086 ac 35.2229 , 78.9306
08+50 Wetland Q 0.0297 ac 35.2227 , 78.9288
06+30 Wetland P 0.0062 ac 35.2228 . 78.9281
Shady Grove Pump Station, 24" PVC Force Main, and Little River WWTP Site
Station Feature Jurisdic Impact Latitude/ Longitude
Pump Sta Wetland GP 0.1740 ac 35.2236 , 78.9259
FM 10+25 Piped Stream, 30" RCP no impact 35.2241 , 78.9232
FM 74+50 Piped Stream, 36" RCP no impact 35.2301 , 78.9034
WWTP site Wetland DC (Ditch C) 0.1102 ac 35.2330 , 78.8849
Updated 1 1/1 /2005 SOUIh ( Grind 11,11 nctt (, 'I, , , '0 A I !'
Pagc 15 of 15
9108936643
Harnett
COUNTY
NOR In AWWA
-tl I
04 32 01 p in 06 0"i 2007 1 /1
A s,,vr AU rfJORIZA rI Du
T'? w Public Utilities Department
WWWAM&Morg
PO Box 1119
308 West Duncan Street
lillinglon, NC 27546-1119
Ph' 910.893-7575
fax. [phone]
June 5, 2007
Robert J. Goldstein & Associates, Inc.
1221 Corporation Parkway, Suite 100
Raleigh, NC 27610
Re: Agent Authorization Letter
Dear Mr. Pottern,
Robert J Goldstein & Associates has permission to serve as an authorized agent of Harnett
County for the purpose of environmental field studies and permitting of Harnett County's
proposed water and wastewater projects.
Sinc
Steve Ward
HCDPU Assistant Director
S W/ckm
strong roots • new growth
2007-06-05 16:28 NORTH CAROURA 9108936643 page 1
bob.
osstem
1??? ?a? ?e??ler?t
PROGRAM
July 24, 2007
Rodney Tart
Harnett County Utilities
PO Box 1119
Lillington, NC 27546
Project: South-Central Harnett Interceptor WWTP
EEP ACcomce FOr`y
County: Harnett
The purpose of this letter is to notify you that the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) is willing to
accept payment for impacts associated with the above referenced project. Please note that this decision does not assure that
the payment will be approved by the permit issuing agencies as mitigation for project impacts. It is the responsibility of the
applicant to contact these agencies to determine if payment to the NCEEP will be approved.
This acceptance is valid for six months from the date of this letter and is not transferable. If we have not received a copy of
the issued 404 Permit/401 Certification/CAMA permit within this time frame, this acceptance will expire. It is the
applicant's responsibility to send copies of the permits to NCEEP. Once NCEEP receives a copy of the permit(s) an invoice
will be. issued based on the required mitigation in that permit and payment must be made prior to conducting the authorizA
work. The amount of the In Lieu Fee to be paid to NCEEP by an applicant is calculated based upon the Fee Schedule and
policies listed at www.nceep.net.
Based on the information supplied by you the impacts that may require compensatory mitigation are summarized in the
following table.
Cape Fear
03030004 Stream (feet) Wetlands (acres) Buffer I
(Sq. Ft.) Buffer [I
(Sq. Ft.)
Cold Cool Warm Riparian Non-Riparian Coastal Marsh
Impacts 0 0 0 0.2842 0 0 0 0
Credits 0 0 0 0.57 0 0 0 0
Upon receipt of payment, EEP will take responsibility for providing the compensatory mitigation. If the regulatory agencies
require mitigation credits greater than indicated above, and the'applicant wants NCEEP to be responsible for the additional
mitigation, the applicant will need to submit a mitigation request to NCEEP for approval prior to permit issuance. The
mitigation will be performed in accordance with the Memorandum of Understanding between the N. C. Department of
Environment and Natural Resources and the U. S. Army Corps of Engineers dated November 4, 1998.
If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact Kelly Williams at [phone].
cc: Cyndi Karoly, NCDWQ Wetlands/401 Unit
Ronnie Smith, USACE-Wilmington
Ken Averitte, NCDWQ-Fayetteville
Gerald Pottern, agent
File
Sincerely,
tl to Gilmore, PE
Director
kmtorr;pl?5... E ... pro", ow Stag
's?L,
IBC E R
North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program, 1652 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1652 / 919-715-0476 / www.nceep net
MAY-30-2007 11:25A FROh1:11ARZIAO & MC-GOUGAN 3366293932 TO:19198729214 P.2f3
DIV _WATER UJPLITY _ Fax [phone])W
RA151 60mp/efioy
F WAT MWhatl F. Easley, 00VOMOr
`,() ?p wpApm 0. Ross Jr., seorawry
Q q North caroms DePayumm of En*Onmont and Natural HeaourCet
t-' Amt W. KNmak, P. E. Director
0 Nywon of water Duatlfy
September 20, 2006
Mr. Rodney Tart. pia vt
Harnett County r>epettt of Public Utilities
P.O. Box 1119
Ullington, North Carolina 27546
centralized wastewater collection and treatment system
RE: EA/FONSI for Implementation Harnett County
in the south central district of DWQ#1365D
Dear Mr. Tart: North On September 19, 20D6, the State Ciearit 8 e?attac?hed latter from chCe Cltearirtghous )?Ittis
owtcy
Act review on the above project comp ( for the
acceptable to proceed with YOU permit applications through the Division of Water Quality
Proposed project. No further actions on the Environmental Assessmam are required.
If there is anything I can assist you with, please do not hesitate to give me a call at [phone],
ext. 555.
Sincerely.
Hannah Stallings
SEPA Caordinatar
Attachments: (SCH Sign Off Letter, FONSn
Cc: Belinda Henson - Surface Water Protection Supervisor, FRO
Gil Vi=mi - NPDBS East
Jeff Poupart - PERCS
DiAslon of water CWaity 1817 Mall f3srvlcs Center fieleiyh, No ¢7699.1817
Customer Sorvice
(819) 7'33.7015
1.077.628-6748
hl1P/JWww.ent.itate.no ut
2007-05-30 10:39 MARZIANO & MINI 3366293932 Page 2
TUN-19-2007 10:00A FR0M:MAR7IA0 & MC-GOUGAN
111v U7HILK UUHL-1IT tax:yl,--1(I Jr
() ;? WAT
0 0?
O ?
T0:19199729214 P.45
U%J
MIMCI F. Eastay. Governor
Wiuiun G. Ross h.. Secretary
Neuth Carolina Dcparvn-t of Fsnvimnmeu and Natural R ewwces
Alan W. Klimek, P. E Director
Division of Waur Quality
-YV--Ik?°? W W'T P I ?s
August 2, 2006
To: Chrys Baggett, State Clearinghouse
From: Darlene Kucken, NCDENR/Division of Water Quality
Subject: EA/FONSI: Harnett
County South Central WWTP the The Division of Water Quality Is submitting for State Clearinghouse rnt Impact enclo sect
copies of the Environmental Assessment and Finding of No Signffica for he
project. has
publish
the EA.
Please The Department of Environment and Natural -Ressourcese environmental documents as
- this project'in the El tro?nmeriWBulletin and CIr
appropriate.
Contact me at 91 9.733.5083 ext. 354 if you have any questions.
Thank You
FOR LEAD STATE AGENCY USE ONLY
conclusion Statement (Misr be ca nplered and signed by responsible state agency and svblWited with
the E4 ,46c- nt to the Stare elaarbaghoure.)
Selsct?e appropriate statement bslow:
After preparattoaheview of this EA, the rccpousible state agency has ooacluded there is A Flndtng of Vo
Sign ?tant Impact (FONSI) and will not be proporing an Environmental hnpact Stareanent (61S). (Attach any •. ,
additional infomtotion regarding this conclusion that you deem im¢?ortant to this flailing.)
_ The agency has co*awd this £.A and is hereby submitting It for review and cotntnW. ARer a
ccttasidtsatioa of the comffientt ctxeivcd, the agency will proud wM a FONSI to prepare as F1S.
Signed Agency
An CAMBM
Ralei , NC 27699.161'7 Plmme [phone] Custotna sm-Ace
it 1617 Mail Scrvtoc Center 27604 F,& (919) 733,2496 t 8?7 6?3 6?at
Noah Carolina Division of Water (ku .ry
Internet }? u___ _"_e"nj1EfQ"11tY rnA Lnctron: 512 N. Salisbuy • St Rateig NC
Post Conwmet Paper
An EQUO 0Wu'tJnky)Aftumalwe ?dion Empbree- 50% RaCydedh0
paly- ) dblz
2007-06-19 09;15 MARZIANO & MINI Page 4
TUN-19-2017 09:59A FROM
U 5D?,
MARZIAO & MC-GOUGAN
cy) I 1e ? OV-\
S ? s+u.,
TO: 19198729214 P. 2.5
NOTICE OF FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT
and
Final Notice of Potential Conversion of Important Farmland
The USDA Rural Utilities Service has received an application for financial assistance from the
South Central Water & Sewer District Phase I (SCWSD). The proposed service area is within the
Anderson Creek Township of Harnett County. The proposed project consists of approximately
357,110 feet of gravity flow sewer lines (sized from 8" to 24 "), 76,500 feet of force main lines
(sized from 6" to 20"), construction of six pumping stations (sized from 180 to 2,800 gpm), and
the purchase of wastewater treatment from Harnett County.
Rural Development has assessed the environmental impacts of this proposed project and
determined that if implemented, the proposed project may cause so a minor direct conversion of
important farmland on sites where it is necessary to construct stations. There could
be some indirect conversion of important farmland in areas designated as growth corridors. The
amount of farmland conversion is a relatively small area in relation to the total amount of
important farmlands in the area, and is not significant in terms of the total land available for farm
use. It has been determined that there is no practicable alternative to avoiding this conversion
As required by the National Environmental Policy Act, the Rural Utilities Service has assessed the
potential environmental effects of the proposed project and has determined that the proposal will
not have a significant effect on the human environment and for which an Environmental Impact
Statement will not be prepared The basis for this determination is a thorough review and analysis
of the environmental information reported in the environmental assessment including public and
regulatory agencies' comments regarding the proposed project. In order to avoid or minimize any
adverse environmental impacts, the Rural Utilities Service will require South Central Water &
Sewer District to incorporate the following mitigation measures into the proposed project's design.
The potential impacts to floodplains will be mitigated through the enforcement of Harnett
County's "No Tap in the Floodplain" restriction on future development and the sealing and
venting of all lines crossing a designated floodplain at one foot above the 100-year floodplain
level to ensure no inflow into the collection system occurs thereby putting the system at minimal
risk for a sewerage spill. The potential impacts to wetlands will be mitigated through the
requirement that planning and construction at stream crossings and associated wetlands be
designed and performed in accordance with the provisions of the Nationwide Permit 12 and
through the US Army Corps of Engineers' Section 404 (Clean Water Act) permitting process and
NCDWQ General 401 Water Quality Certification and the use of anti-seep devices on all lines
crossing wetlands to prevent drainage from occurring along the pipelines. Adequate erosion
control measures will be employed, requiring both temporary and permanent measures, to return
the disturbed land to its pre-construction state as soon as possible.
The US Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all of its programs and
activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, sex, religion, age, disability, political beliefs,
sexual orientation, or marital or family status. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.)
Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program
information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA's TARGET Center at (202)
720-2600 (voice and TDD).
X007-0E-19 09:14 M.ARZIANO & MINI Page 2
IL
USACE AID#
So w ' 1-hovt(, Gd W tp
DWQ4
AC6 :3 CeA-or Ri M
Site #_ (indicate on atutchcd map)
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
Provide the following information for the?e!! stream reach under assessment:
-__-Uf?101
1. Applicant's name: u'uh 2. Evaluator's name:
0-0
3. Date of evaluation: K? 0 4. Time of evaluation 00 -
5. Name of stream: cjj Tom` C L --3 C Z 6. River basin: -? L! f1 (Vf l
7. Approximate drainage area: 1/0 aCMS 8. Stream order:- 1 sI
9. Length of reach evaluated: -1/ 0-ao ke t 10. County:
-gyp -
11. Site coordinates (if known): prefer in decimal degrees. 12. Subdivision name (if any):
Latitude (ex. 34.872312): ??• d ?0 Longitude (ex -775 661 1 ): O p t q
Method location determined (circle): GPS Topo Sheet Ortho (Aerial) Photo/GIS Other GIS Other
13. Location of reach under evaluation (note nearby roa s an an mars and attach map identifying stream(s) location):______
klef d?k C1--, C r7 am pr?pas?d ww-rr s?{e: Sl dv cave 1,?d S'Q_ aoso----------
r
14. Proposed channel work (if any):
k1l
15. Recent weather conditions: PR ??
16. Site conditions at time of visit: ?? I
17. Identify any special waterway classifications known: Section 10 -Tidal Waters Essential I ishei ie,: I luh utt
-Trout Waters Outstanding Resource Waters Nutrient Sensitive Waters Water Supply Watershed - _ ___(I-I V' I
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? YES 0 if yes, estimate the water surface area:----
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? 0 NO 20. Does channel appear on t ISDA Soil Survey" Yl;S 0
21. Estimated watershed land use: % Residential _% Commercial °b Industrial Agricultur:+l
_% Forested aO % Cleared / Logged 9'0 _% Other I— / pla b7t _
22. Bankfull width: 4-8 'tt 23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank): a f t
24. Channel slope down center of stream: Flat (0 to 2%) Gentle (2 to 4%) -Moderate (4 to 10%) __ titecl? I
25. Channel sinuosity: Straight -Occasional bends _Frequent meander Very sinuous Bwidcd haun
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecurc< ion hu 1 III
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. 1ssin points
to each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the
characteristics identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a
characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the
comment section. Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.,-,.. the stream flows from a p- is iure
into a forest), the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate eaclI
reach. The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing-, a stream (I) the
highest quality.
Total
Dw Qs
Evaluator's Signature Date ILW {
This channel evaluation form is intended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment ul strewn
quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to U'ACE ;ipproval and does not imply :i
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change - version 06,'0 3 -1 o Cot mr-it, please call O I 1)-S7o-? 141 x '(,
Air So - W 1?11? si' h-
AuF, souk d J4 C 1--? c 17
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET Q J-uw,267
z -fyC .vr .- ? ?? },O}Nr1; RANGE

-?- SCORE-i
- Moat 'Piedmont Slountain
='s'
l, ?' z ,`-Presence of [low f persistent pools in'stre, -tin
Ex. ,.
0-5
0-4 0-5
I
s (no flow or saturation= 0; strum, flow- max points)
-
2 Evidence of past human alteration
'
0 6
0-5
0-5
` : 0; noalteration= max points) .'
(extensive alteration
- Riparian zone
n,, buffer= 0; comigurws, wide buffer =- max points) _
1 v idence of nutrient or chemical discharges
0-5
0-4
0-4
S
4 (cxtensivc dischar-cs = 0, no dis barges near points ;
Groundwater discharoe
nodischar>e? 0 s?rin ?s seeps, wetlands, etc; =rnax poirrtsl
r 't' Presuuc of adjacent iloodplaiir,' 0-4 0-4 0 -
rio #laod lain.0 'extensive flood Main -,tnax points ':
«" ' Lufrenchmcntlfloodplam'access 0-5 0-4 0-2 Q
h '_? >t << .: dce 1 %'entrcnehed ,.-o;'frecjiient floodiiie. ',riax points)
Presence'uf adjacent wetlands
0
0
4
0
0-2
s. _
no wetlands = 0. large-adjacent %etlands - max pints . - - -?
Channel sinuosity,*,'
0- 5
0- 4
0-3

0
(CXtensiVe eh:11111cli7.rtion = 0: natural meander - moue points)
10 Sediment input
- 5
0 - 4
0 - 4
-, r extensive de position- 0; little or no sediment= mcrx points) -
'Size & diversity of channel bed Substrate - 0-4 U-
w
°t?'?fine,'lipmo enous , 0,']arge divuse.Sizes;,'maxpint'
de?icc;of. h'aipnclancision WN" s
'
? 0- 5' 0_ 4 0 5

M:
ble bed r ?t
z ed
?
a o,liank

erosi0n' , ,>
O;:uQc stun'? st ib'_ an taxi o
severe: x„
0 _
0-5
0- 5
- I-' --

1
-
r Root depth and density on banks''` 0-3 0-4 0-5
14 no v isiblc roots - 0, dense roots ihrou?fiout - maa } Dints)

15

'. Impact by agriculture, livestock, or timberproductiApr
;.

(substantial impact =(no cvidencc= max points) s
0
0-1
0-5 j

I
I ( Presence of riftle-pool ripple-pool complexes
0-3
0-5
0-6
(n) riffles/ripples or pools 0, well-developed - max points)
N
?17 -- -- --
1 I abitat complexity -

0-6 ----

0- 6

0 6
(little or no habitat U frequent, varied habnats - marts)
Canopy coverage over streambed 0-5 0-5 0- 5
_ =.(no shadiiil,- ve,_ctation = 0; continuous canopy = nrar points) _
cdd
ess '
e
?n NA* 0-4 0-4
struct ire =mar)
d 0
lo
dec ply en bJ l .
-Presence of stream invertebrates (see page 4)
0
4
0
5
0
5
20, (ro evidence - 0; common, numenxrs types nax points) - - -

? 21 Presence of amphibians

0_4

0-4

0-4
O; lino evidence 0; common, numerous tvp(2s= max points)

O ,> Presence 'offish
0--4
0-4
0-4
M (no evidence - 0• common, numerous types = max oints) _
`
'> Evidence of wildlife use

"
`
0-6
0-5
0-5
3 - 0: abundant c, idcncc
(nr, evidcncc
- max
1 otal Points Possibly 100 100 100

* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.
Sccktr
2
PAIQ sTM4?1"

North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form;
Version 3.1
Date: a I-tiwG a00
Evaluator: 6, ro h-ffYi
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent
if ? 19 or perennial if ? 30
Project: Hzirlrnh?-?-C ?
Site: _M4 li11 --+ C. Jr ! 1
County: /?f'hett
Latitude: 35. 2 3-? ()
Longitude: 7g, ggyq
Other !/
e g Quad Name: Ma?t?es l?,
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal
1a. Continuous bed and bank
2. Sinuosity
3. In-channel structure: riffle-pool sequence
4. Soil texture or stream substrate sorting
5. Active/relic floodplain
6. Depositional bars or benches
7. Braided channel
8. Recent alluvial deposits
9 a Natural levees
10. Headcuts
Absent Weak Moderate
0 1 2
- r _ -_
1 2
i 1 --- 2 .
io 1 2
1 2
1 ?_-
1 2
1 2
Strong
'D )TGN
0
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
1.5
15
11. Grade controls 0 0.5 1
12. Natural valley or drainageway 0 0 5
13. Second or greater order channel on existing
USGS or NRCS map or other documented No 10
evidence.
Yes = i
a Man-made ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
R Hvrirnlnnv (Suhtntal = 2.0 )
14. Groundwater flow/discharge
15. Water in channel and > 48 hrs since rain, or
Water in channel -- d or growing season
16. Leaflitter
17. Sediment on plants or debris
18. Organic debris lines or piles (Wrack lines)
19. Hydric soils (redoximorphic features) present?
?? - 2 3
2 3
1.5 1 0.5--
- 0 0.5 1 1.5
0.5 1 1.5
No = 0 Yes = 1 5
`ZS
C. Biology (Subtotal = _
__)
20 . Fibrous roots in channel 3 2 0
21 . Rooted plants in channel 3 2 1 0
22. Crayfish 0 0.5 1 1 5
23. Bivalves 0 1 2 3
24. Fish 0 0.5 1 1 5
25. Amphibians 0 0.5 1 1.5
26. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance) 0 0.5 i 1 1,5
27. Filamentous algae; periphyton 0 1 2 3
28. Iron oxidizing bacteria/fungus. 0 1 1 5
29b. etland plants in streambed FAC 0 5, FACW ?075)
OBI = 1 5 SAV = 2 f1 O.he
Items 20 and 21 focus on the presence of upland pla nts, Item 29 focuses on the presence of =I, It " ?i :-] .i, ? ; ,,1,,.?Sketch
Notes: (use back side of this form for additional notes.)
To id A 4- Q + C v2 5- Vicb of 1.0 p
/ban hfuFt° JS a i?1, MW6-
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Determination Manual)
Wetlands GP, MA, GA, U. T, S, R, Q, and P
Project I Site: South Central Harnett County Scwer .lob '12470 Date: I 1052004_
Applicant I Owner: Marziano & Minier / Harnett County Utilities County: Harnett
Investigator: Sean Peffer, Jessi O'Neal -- R.J.Goldstein & Associates__ State: NC

Do normal circumstances exist on the site? Yes X No Community: forest/shrub
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical situation) Yes No X wetland depression
Is the area a potential problem area? Yes No X Transect ID: wetl GP
(explain on reverse if needed) Plot ID: N of GP-5
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
1. Vaccinium tenellum H FAC 9. Nyssa sylvatica T FAC
2. Vitis rotundifolia V FAC 10. Clethra alnifolia S FACW
3. Lyonia lucida S FACW 11.
4. Ilex glabra S FACW 12.
5. Smilax rotundifolia V FAC 13.
6. Acer rubrum T FAC 14.
7. Liquidambar styraciflua T FAC+ 15.
8. Magnolia virginiana T FACW t 16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC excluding FAC-). 100`%,
Remarks: Wetland Vegetation Present Based Upon Greater than 50% of the Plant Species are Classified its
FAC-OBL in the National List of Plant Species that Occur in Wetlands. Vegetation is sinvlar to above in
wetlands MA, GA, U, T, S, R, Q, and P along the gravity interceptor corridor.
HYDROLOGY
Recorded Data (Describe In Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators
Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge
Aerial Photographs Primary Indicators:
Other Inundated
X Saturated in Upper 12"
No Recorded Data Available Water Marks
Drift Lines
Field Observations: Sediment Deposits
X Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Depth of Surface Water: 0 (in.) Secondary Indicators:
Oxidized Roots Channels in Upper 12"
Depth to Free Water in Pit: 2 - 16 (in.) x Water-Stained Leaves
Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Saturated Soil: 0 - 10 (in.) x FAC-Neutral Test
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
Typical floodplain depression hydrology indicators. Indicators are similar to above in wetlands MA, GA, U, "I, S, R.
Q, and P along the gravity interceptor corridor.
I/3
SOILS
Map Unit Name
(Series and Phase): Altavista fine sandy loam Drainage Class: moderately well drained
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Thermic Aquic Hapludults Confirm Mapped Type? Yes No
Profile Description:
Depth Matrix Colors Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions,
(inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Structure, etc.
12 B 2.5Y3/1 -- -
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol Concretions
Histic Epipedon High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
X Sulfidic Odor Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
Aquic Moisture Regime Listed On Local Hydric Soils List
Reducing Conditions Listed on National Hydric Soils List
X Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: An unmapped hydric inclussion within the mapped Altavista (AtA) soil series. Soils in wetlands MA,
GA, U, T, S, R, Q, and P along the gravity interceptor corridor are mapped as Altavista (AtA), Bibb (Bb), or Wahee
(We) series, and have soil color and redoximorphie features similar to wetland GP.
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampling Point
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No Within a Wetland? Yes X No
Hydric Soils Present? Yes X No
Remarks: Wetland GP is classified as a wetland hascd upon the criteria set forth in the 1987 Army Corps of
Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual. Wetlands MA. GA. U, T, S. R, Q, and P along the gravity interceptor
corridor have vegetation, soils, and hydrology indicators similar to CAP and are also classified as x%ctlands hased on
the 1987 ACOE manual.
2/s
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Determination Manual)
Uplands near GP. MA. GA. ti_ "f. S. R. Q. and N
Project / Site: South Central Harnett County Sewer/ Job 42470 Date: 1 1/05/2004
Applicant/ Owner: Marziano & Minier / Harnett County Utilities
Investigator: Sean Peffer Jessi O'Neal - R.J.Goldstein & Associates County: Harnett
State: NC

Do normal circumstances exist on the site? Yes X No
disturbed (Atypical situation)? Yes No X
nificantl
si
it
th
I Community: hw-pine
forest
y
g
e s
e
s
Is the area a potential problem area? Yes No X
(explain on reverse if needed) Transect ID: wetl GP
Plot ID: S ofGP-5
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
1. Vaccinium tenellum H FAC 9. Nyssa sylvatica T FAC
2. Vitis rotundifolia V FAC 10. Clethra alnifolia S FACW
3. Lyonia lucida S FACW 11. Pinus taeda T FAC
4. Ilex opaca S FAC- 12.
5. Smilax rotundifolia V FAC 13.
6. Acer rubrum T FAC 14.
7. Liquidambar styracif7ua T FAC+ 15.
8. Magnolia virginia T FACW+ 16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC excluding FAC-). 91%
Remarks: Wetland Vegetation is Present Based Upon Greater than 50% of the Plant Species are Classified as
FAC-OBL in the National List of Plant Species that Occur in Wetlands. Vegetation is similar to above in uplands
adjacent to MA, GA, U, T, S, R, Q, and P along the gravity interceptor corridor.
HYDROLOGY
Recorded Data (Describe In Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators
Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge
Aerial Photographs Primary Indicators:
Other Inundated
-Saturated in Upper 12"
No Recorded Data Available Water Marks
Drift Lines
Field Observations: Sediment Deposits
Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Depth of Surface Water: (in.) Secondary Indicators:
Oxidized Roots Channels in Upper 12"
Depth to Free Water in Pit: (i??•) Water-Stained Leaves
Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Saturated Soil: >18 (in.) X FAC-Neutral Test
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
Wetland hydrology indicators not present. Indicators are similar to above in uplands adjacent to MA, GA, U, T, S,
R, Q, and P along the gravity interceptor corridor.
3/g
SOILS
Map Unit Name
(Series and Phase): Altavista tine sandy loam Drainage Class: moderately well drained
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Thermic Anuic Hapludults Confirm Mapped Type? Yes No
Profile Description:
Depth Matrix Colors Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions,
(inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Structure, etc.
0-14+ A 10 YR 3i3 clay loam
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol Concretions
Histic Epipedon High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
Sulfidic Odor Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
Aquic Moisture Regime Listed On Local Hydric Soils List
Reducing Conditions Listed on National Hydric Soils List
_Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors -Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: Not hydric. Similar soil indicators in uplands mapped as Altavista, Gilead, and Wahee adjacent to
MA, GA, U, T, S, R, Q, and P along the gravity interceptor corridor.
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampling Point
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X Within a Wetland? Yes_ No X
Hydric Soils Present? Yes No X
Remarks: Areas adjacent to wetland GP are not classified as a wetland based upon the criteria set forth in the
1987 Army Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual. Non-wetland areas adjacent to MA, GA, U, T, S, R,
Q, and P along the gravity interceptor corridor have vegetation, soils, and hydrology indicators similar those near GP
and are also classified as non-wetlands based on the 1987 ACOE manual.
q/9
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Determination Manual)
Wetland DC (Ditch C)
Project / Site: South Central Harnett County Sc%%er & %VWTP Date: 12 June 2007
Applicant / Owner: Marziano & Minier; Harnett Courm Utilities County: Harnett
Investigator: Gerald Pottern -- R.J.Goldstein & Associates State: NC

Do normal circumstances exist on the site? Yes X No Community: herb/shrub
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical situation) Yes No X man-made ditch wetland
Is the area a potential problem area? Yes No X
7
Transect ID: Cl - CI
(explain on reverse if needed) Plot ID: near C I O
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
1. Cyrilla racemiflora S FACW 9.
2. Woodwardia areolata H OBL 10.
3. Lyonia lucida S FACW 11.
4. Ilex glabra S FACW 12.
5. Smilax rotundifolia V FAC 13.
6. Acer rubrum T FAC 14.
7. Osmunda regalis H OBL 15.
8. Magnolia virginiana S FACW 16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC excluding FAC-). 100`%o
Remarks: Wetland Vegetation Present Based Upon Greater than 50% of the Plant Species are Classified as
FAC-OBL in the National List of Plant Species that Occur in Wetlands
HYDROLOGY
Recorded Data (Describe In Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators
_ Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge
Aerial Photographs Primary Indicators:
Other Inundated
X Saturated in Upper 12"
No Recorded Data Available Water Marks
Drift Lines
Field Observations: Sediment Deposits
Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Depth of Surface Water: 0 (in.) Secondary Indicators:
Oxidized Roots Channels in Upper 12"
Depth to Free Water in Pit: 2 - 10 (in.) x Water-Stained Leaves
Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Saturated Soil: 0 - 6 (in.) FAC-Neutral Test
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: Ditch bed has saturated soil; surroundim, mesic flamoods does not Recent ??cather has peen do
SOILS S/9
Map Unit Name
(Series and Phase): Wahee fine sandy loam Drainage Class: moderately well drained
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Thermic Aquic Hapludults Confirm Mapped Type? Yes No
Profile Description:
Depth Matrix Colors Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions,
(inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Structure, etc.
10 ? 2.5 Y 3,'l ---
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol Concretions
Histic Epipedon High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
_Sulfidic Odor Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
_Aquic Moisture Regime Listed On Local Hydric Soils List
_ Reducing Conditions Listed on National Hydric Soils List
X Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: An unmapped hydric inclussion within the mapped Wahee (We) soil series. Redoximorphic features
likely developed as a result of ditching. Soils on either side of the ditch are not hydric.
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampling Point
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No Within a Wetland? Yes X No
Hydric Soils Present? Yes X No
Remarks: Wetland DC is classified as a wetland hased upon the criteria set forth in the 1987 Army Corps of
Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual.
618
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Determination Manual)
Upland near Wetland DC
Project / Site: South Central Harnett County Sewer & W WTP Date: 12 June 2007
Applicant / Owner: Marziano & Milner 'Harnett County Utilities County: Harnett
Investigator: Gerald Pottern -- R.J.Goldstein & Associates State: NC

Do normal circumstances exist on the site? Yes X No Community: Shrubby
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical situation) Yes No X mesic flatwoods
Is the area a potential problem area? Yes No X Transect ID: ('I = ( I
(explain on reverse if needed) Plot ID: \ of t_ l0
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
1. Cyrilla raceiniflora S FACW 9. Quercus niyra S FAC
2. Nyssa sylvatica S FAC 10. Clethra alnifolia S FACW
3. Lyonia lucida S FACW 11. Vitis rotundifolia V FAC
4. Ilex glabra S FACW 12.
5. Smilax rotundifolia V FAC 13.
6. Acer rubnun 1 1 A( 14.
7. Pinus taeda T FAC 15.
8. Magnolia virginiana S FACW+ 16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC excluding FAC-). 100`%
Remarks: Wetland Vegetation Present Based Upon Greater than 50`%0 of the Plant Species are Classified as
FAC-0131, in the National List of Plant Species that Occur in Wetlands
HYDROLOGY
Recorded Data (Describe In Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators
_ Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge
Aerial Photographs Primary Indicators:
Other Inundated
-Saturated in Upper 12"
No Recorded Data Available Water Marks
Drift Lines
Field Observations: Sediment Deposits
Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Depth of Surface Water: 0 (i Secondary Indicators:
------Oxidized Roots Channels in Upper 12"
Depth to Free Water in Pit: 10 (in.) Water-Stained Leaves
Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Saturated Soil >16 (in.) FAC-Neutral Test
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: No evidence of saturation within the upper 16 inches. Recent weather has been dry.
7/S
SOILS
Map Unit Name
(Series and Phase): Wahee tine sand\ loam Drainage Class: moderately well drained
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Thermic Aquic Hapludults Confirm Mapped Type? Yes--- No____
Profile Description:
Depth Matrix Colors Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions,
(inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Structure, etc.
10 ? 2.5 Y 5/2 - none
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol Concretions
Histic Epipedon High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
Sulfidic Odor Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
Aquic Moisture Regime Listed On Local Hydric Soils List
Reducing Conditions Listed on National Hydric Soils List
Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: Soils in the adjacent wetland ditch DC appear to have developed redoximorphic features as a result of'
ditching.
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampling Point
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X Within a Wetland? Yes__ No_ X
Hydric Soils Present? Yes No X
Remarks: The mesic flatwoods adjacent to Wetland DC is not classified as a wetland based upon lack of wetland
hydrology and hydric soil indicators as set forth in the 1987 Army Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual.
F/ 9
o by m x ? ? ? r
m o
r?
?b0
<°A cc
41
47
q^ ,
--
° a U
eoeen,s / no
??•? Vii ??P?? ?? /y? / o °? __ J C/)
I ° = N ? O 0 ?? ' \ \ ? Y'\Y r ^ rw
/' vJ 1 _J O '
Ca. 7)
67 Otl
a
tl
tr -._ f? '°??el - - -- ? ? •,? E"I Q??
- / ) ¢ ,? ?( \ / u?i J , \ - ? '!° l u 11 ? rrQ^? Q ? w
CIO
-? - O/` / \I U ', o Otl OMII/ l; O 0 ` jV.-/-?,? Q F'? cr)
l? °Y i 13 _ II .? OIIEr /? \ ~ r--I W O W ??
OY dY ? \ II ? < ? \?- I
T' 1
I s / ?S 1 C r_
ty _ ? S 2 OY 3tl / / o.!V?r ? \ , ?J Wi< • / ? O
nn 1
\ NOlJY °b \ P?? !! 1Y. ? - ?)`W ? / ? / ? ? YlMIrM /??(
< n _
( cyJ COLEMAN PO OY \? \ \.. 6 \ ( \
Y I I ? '13Yp ?' O ? g /
??r T ? I OY r °< \ I o I i 1 i `
L I Z \O 1
all r 31"31 ' AP ?Y u '? C - - I ! 1 f-'1 \? ?i 0 40
E d \
300R1? '0- "? I M'L
P I ?Q ?I/ lip p
r - T
wl
y 1 .. ? ? ' N fre Plo?'E P Q? \ ' ? O
1 m N I ? o?\ \
° Pp ? o ? 10- /? i ? AY J
GcL
°y otl rnv i I'- fy a d
n.NSgiT ;Jrli c _ / rnr W ?.;
N J ?"
4
d -
s? I 1 ?P/nJ A
p0Cs b°Y.
no K"\ ? 1\• hew \? Po vtr n -? _? VI _ ?
v 'y # tlb Y ( 1? - lp
,
I _
? ? i Ls? - y? ? h 1
------------ L
4 T-- OY M3DM ? ? \
;w r ? o k ? me - ?-
,
•11
irrl 7i / J f _ ?? ? ? .vim ?.? - 1 - _ - _ A? J ? ?, VY•''.???Q?v ?Y
i
CA;
41 s O
? • 1
c ?
i o •
i
i Q
/ ? n?flNd • . / ? p v
CI?
cl?
a - - -Lij? 70 cli
? h
mop p
?jj
\ 43A Nl day j- % -_? \;! - 0 0 0
'? OJ sir ?
Z i ?, Lh
tzl
a?
ty.
I to €i:` a`
•ti Q
?? - r ? • ??? _ _ _ by (Z, C?i? z
IS
``? ?(.\\ II ? d1 111\
? ? ?? `? o?• o I ? ???? _ ?? it
J!
v 1 1
J °fa G ? i. Q
V F m ??
44.
y ! `v) may,
m
t ,,. w' k k zf 2`t' Q
- L 'Y ct CC +r' t K x "
a r r3" ?`` yam. ? I
CD-
Y r? ?$ f cad ?y.x Q r s
-€c- x o
f
o f
` 2 {yam S *y' ? fsLXt
??.? n? Q ?.?+4. rA. .?^•?'"' s J.i?- eft `? 1?:
u _ O' ? .x d
_, m t co
CO
t
S• , ? .fir, .`'? ? a 'Fri,, .. , ' ? `` ??- .• - -
7
co
Q
'Y_ Mil
3
CO' >
?t
T, k' .. y L ,. i• W
A ?`•9 v • 9 ?r i yr' F`.I L-?.
CC)
CID
" f OR
c 1 Lo-?
Q ?J
??! _ i ?4 aM q 0
1 ? cti o
Q
I v ?
\\ O Q ? 8
c m \
c c?
Q \ L Q
o -
Cl-
' Q 3
CO r
QC CID
70 m
Y `
N.
m d /may -
f0 ? -xl Q V'
CO CL t
uo
cr CL
c
.? J
m c<
z
_ Q
? o
G -Y
:/ P m
Q
Z m
a
v
r H
?" 3 o z
0
3 `r ¢
Ci (-,
' (t ?D
Q) Q z
7-1
ti W C?
o w
V] Q., V O
z
r,? O O
L
? O
bD y?
w

Lake
Mc Kay

gi;GIN
ST ATiof1 (t9+6o
500 feet
?? Strea?m 1
t8 ft wide
7rc?
Wetland MB
No lmpal-t
?-Wetland N
No 1MPact
Figure 4a. Stream and Wetland Impacts along Gravity Interceptor
Construction Corridor, Station 119+60 to Station 94+00.
Robert J. Goldstein & Associates, Inc
ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS

?/ .Si ?TI?N q?+00
?' 5 Cream a 8 ft wide-
Stream 3 , 10 ft wide
,o
N /
i
i
i
i
/ Stream
35 ft wide
E. ?

ahd U
!ct - . 0Z06 ac
Stream 7
f s ft wAe
1
f
r? -1
ID
c: A
77
z? o
m -- r.
7' a ? s
77
n _o
- ? __ crc
Z N
n
c?
J
J
V
Figure 4d. Stream and Wetland Impacts along Gravity Interceptor
Construction Corridor, Station 22+00 to Shady Grove Pump Station.
Robert J. Goldstein & Associates, Inc
- - ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS Force Main
STATION 0+ 0
?. ST?TioN as+00
v _ pump Staf ion --
-?, t?+pact .17?I0 ac
tfand T
e
i ?n part = .0'I46 '? __?- = ?
V,1etIa0 d S -5 TATI NN
rn 7act = .0895 ac 0+ 0 0
i
M Pact -. 0062 ac __-r
er
etlard R
impact _ .6686 ac Llt?e t2?y
;?wetland Q
impact '.0297 ac
5o0 feet

Force MaiK
STATION Z9 +0o

Force Malh
STATION 0 t 00
.,hady Grove Roan(

? --? ? PUMP
Si-AT 1o N
a'f 9 ra?v??y
i ntercepto r

4 I,
H
stream
PP
No Impact
. Zb a 10 !
500 feet

Figure Sa. Stream and Wetland Impacts from Shady Grove
Pump Station along Force Main Corridor to Little River WWTP,
Station 0+00 to Station 29+00.
Robert J. Goldstein & Associates, Inc
ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS
Force Maivl
STATION (02 t 00
i
ad ?j i ?o
goo feet
i

30
force Mash
STRtioN _ too

Figure 5b. Stream and Wetland Impacts from Shady Grove
Pump Station along Force Main Corridor to Little Rivcr WWTP,
Station 29+00 to Station 62+00.
Robert J. Goldstein & Associates, Inc
ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS

ff ceMaih
ATION ?a+00
,y
?o

'' 1S
Piped stream
No Tvmpact
load
Force Maim ,.
S7AZ'10 N qa +00
r
500 feet
Figure 5c. Stream and Wetland Impacts from Shady Grove
Pump Station along Force Main Corridor to Little River WWTP,
Station 62+00 to Station 92+00.
Robert J. Goldstein & Associates, Inc
ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS
Force Maim
STATION 123+01D

Force MaiK
STATION V+00
&YO
?11 .?o?oei
/
I --4
500 feet

Figure 5d. Stream and Wetland Impacts from Shady Grove
Pump Station along Force Main Corridor to Little River WWTP,
Station 92+00 to Station 123+00.
Robert J. Goldstein & Associates, Inc
ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS

Force Haiti
St-AT(ON 123+•0o

Figure Se. Stream and Wetland Impacts from Shady Grove
Pump Station along Force Main Corridor to Little River WWTP,
Station 123+00 to WWTP.
Robert J. Goldstein & Associates, Inc
ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS
d
rode!
Shat :!?- ?,p,?
Z°S0
SR

E0 0 feet
WWTP t,
access road
3
Weet(Ana B
No I'mpact
{A
"I" I WWTP site

?,1
Rd
64e,
hady
?50
s
?
'-?,
sR
?

Figure Sf. Stream and Wetland Impacts at
Little River WWTp Site Harnett County
v
.
'v Robert J. Goldstein &
Associates, Inc
ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANT
S

`
a `'? 1
_. ?,e
1

1
I ?

Access Road
f
t
do Force Main ee
;1 200
:_ ". - ;;/' _-
•
`
? 400
??
?
?

'Do

o•

Cascade

- -- `--: Aerator
??
+

Effluent Stream 8
?_?= D i scl?ar '
= 9e (Bank lMpact)
1
.?rrLE
?t?ER

Lake \
McKay
=J
i
1
I
it
it I
I I
3
II I
1
II
i
_.?-.---?--.----?-_? -fir
_--I?., ? ? goo feet
e
A A
- ---------- -
kletland M A
.0034 acre temp. '10pact
w
(rto tOP05raptiic chahye)

Figure 6a. Close-Up of Wetland Impacts, Wetland MA.
Robert J. Goldstein & Associates, Inc
ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS

i
q0t constrac p Corridor
20' Fermayieht Easeovent
(lo' Monied in wetlands
SO feet

W?{lahd ? R ? ? ? - _ - -
? o
,30 ._! eM porotry Cleared = . 009 ac o
10" Permanent MOwed - • 0023 aC
?" - -
-L6 I= , o 0 O ac
(no permaviemtt 1aPo9 mpWc chap ye) Figure 6b. Close-Up of Wetland Impacts, Wetland G.A.
Robert J. Goldstein & Associates, Inc
ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS
1 y a
I
Wetland u
30/ TemP cleared= . U1371
10' Perm MDVJed = .0047
f0tal-.020 act
(ho 6Po9 raphic c?avl9e>

I
I
feet
0 so 100

Figure 6c. Close-Up of Wetland Impacts, Wetland U.
Robert J. Goldstein & Associates, Inc
ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS
y
?Jetla?d T ?
30' Temp cleared = . oHg0 ac
10' Perm. Molded = .025C ac ?
o
total -
_ ? c,han e) ?`'
(no to ra ic'
9
z
-Feet
o 0 so 100
1

Figure 6d. Close-Up of Wetland Impacts, Wetlands S and T.
Robert J. Goldstein & Associates, Inc
ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS
Wetland S
30' Tew+p Cleared:= .062Z ac
A / Perm. Mowed = .0273 ac ?
-iota I = . 089 S a c,
(no topographic c6mye-)
r " s r
\ oo
Wetland R \
30 rem clear- .007.761c,
P l0' Pero? mow - .0014 aC
fatal = .0096 ac
?00 topojmpkic c kiw e)
,

Feet

o so
0
a
N,
Figure 6e. Close-Up of Wetland Impacts, Wetland R.
Robert J. Goldstein & Associates, Inc
ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS
loo

-Fee t
0 SO
o

loo /
- o
-
_?-- -?- VJ e t la h d P
T'en?P deareid = .OON6 ac
Perm moiled = .001 ac
Wellond R
Temp cleared . . ORO9 ac
Perm mowed .4)09'1 ac.
t f a,Q = . 0 aq 7 a c.
(MO topoymp Ivc. cAa"9e)
s
/
/
tote( .046a Qc
(ho -bPO raP6_- c6ye)
Figure 6f. Close-Up of Wetland Impacts, Wetlands P and Q.
Robert J. Goldstein & Associates, Inc
rriA I TD (_'? rrnA C N irrnT /? n\ rcr 1 i -- nr.i'rc
A.t3.t? . I
ess ro\
ad - ?
p..erny(av?eKt :Fill = lrigO ac
(No fempordry

S&Wy Grave Road ?q ll {arcemain to WWTP
o-

.?N "" i nterCe-P LV
100 feet
Figure 6g. Close-Up of Wetland Impacts. Wetland C;P.
Robert J. Goldstein & Associates, Inc
ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS
Figure 6h. Close-Up of'Wetland Impacts, Wetland DC.
' Robet J. Goldstein S, Associates, Inc
it I Access Rood
I?NVIRONMIA TAI. CONSULTANTS
i ?
Force Main
C?
wetland .
f ' - IMPQcr = 800 ?x ?. Pern,dnent
t
6 = .110a acre
0?hsfiru?i o?
\ j
WctJa ?, +, 7, T,
?? ;... -------- - 1 I I
-
200 feet Effluent
==t4,'
outfall to
L i the River -
(ho wetlahas)