440064_Inspection_20211206

Division of Water Resources
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 440064
Facility Status: Proposed
Permit: AWC440064 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Inactive Or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine
County:
Haywood
Region:
Date of Visit: 12/06/2021 Entry Time: 08:00 am Exit Time: 9:00 am Incident #:
Farm Name: WNC Regional Livestock Center LLC
Owner: Wnc Regional Livestock Center LLC
Mailing Address: 594 Brevard Rd
Asheville
Owner Email: [e-mail]
Phone: [phone]
Asheville NC 28806
Physical Address: 474 Stock Dr Canton NC 28716
Facility Status: ❑ Compliant • Not Compliant Integrator:
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35° 33' 10"
Interstate 40, exit 33 onto SR 1004 1/4 mi. to SR 1613 and then 1/4 mile.
Longitude: 82° 49' 60"
Question Areas:
▪ Dischrge & Stream Impacts
▪ Records and Documents
▪ Waste Col, Stor, & Treat
▪ Other Issues
Waste Application
Certified Operator:
Secondary OIC(s):
Jack Dan Messer
Operator Certification Number: 1010356
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Dan Messer
Primary Inspector:
Inspector Signature:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Timothy R Fox Phone: [phone]
Date:
Inspection Summary:
Tim Fox with ARO DWR inspected the site.
Dan Messer assisted during the inspection. Mr. Messer has obtained his AWB certification (#1010356)
Not all required records avaiable during the inspection.
Need any new facility changes/updates and land application records.
This would include but not be limited to: waste analysis, WU Plan, soils, PAN calculation, etc.
Items #10, 19, 20, 21, 24, 32,& 34.
Please provide all record keeping documents and new information by January 1, 2022.
Page 1 of 5

Permit: AWC440064
Inspection Date: 12/06/21
Owner: Wnc Regional Livestock Cent Facility Number: 440064
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Narrative:
The facility conducts an auction one day per week (Monday). Animals will be on -site on the day -before,
the day -of and the day -after the sale.
The facility is designed to hold a maximum of 700 beef stocker/feeder cattle. The entire facility is
covered and collects no rainfall or runoff as part of the manure management system. Manure will be handled as a solid material.
Surface -scraped manure will be stockpiled under cover and land applied to fields in the Waste Plan that are off -site.
The livestock facility is located at 474 Stock Drive, Canton and the land application site is approximately three miles away at 284
Caring Place Loop, Clyde, NC 28721.
Page 2 of 5

Permit: AWC440064
Inspection Date: 12/06/21
Owner: Wnc Regional Livestock Cent Facility Number: 440064
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at:
Structure
Application Field
Other
a. Was conveyance man-made?
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the
State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e./ larc
trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
waste management or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable
to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
Hydraulic Overload?
Frozen Ground?
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
PAN?
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
Total Phosphorus?
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
Outside of acceptable crop window?
Evidence of wind drift?
Application outside of application area?
Crop Type 1
Yes No NA NE
❑ • ❑ ❑
❑ • ❑ ❑
❑ • ❑ ❑
❑ • ❑ ❑
Yes No NA NE
❑ • ❑ ❑
❑ • ❑ ❑
❑ • ❑ ❑
Yes No NA NE
• ❑ ❑ ❑
❑ • ❑ ❑
El
El
El
Fescue (Hay, Pasture)
Page 3 of 5

Permit: AWC440064
Inspection Date: 12/06/21
Owner: Wnc Regional Livestock Cent Facility Number: 440064
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Crop Type 2
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste
Management Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre
determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
Records and Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
Checklists?
Design?
Maps?
Lease Agreements?
Other?
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
Weekly Freeboard?
Waste Analysis?
Soil analysis?
Waste Transfers?
Weather code?
Rainfall?
Stocking?
Crop yields?
Yes No NA NE
Udorthents
Evard
❑ • ❑ ❑
❑ • ❑ ❑
Yes No NA NE
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
•
• ❑ ❑ ❑
Page 4 of 5

Permit: AWC440064
Inspection Date: 12/06/21
Owner: Wnc Regional Livestock Cent Facility Number: 440064
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
120 Minute inspections?
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipmen
(NPDES only)?
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the
appropriate box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes,
contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit
(i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field
Lagoon / Storage Pond
Other
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or
CAW M P?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
Yes No NA NE
❑ • ❑ ❑
❑ • ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
❑ • ❑ ❑
❑ • ❑ ❑
❑ • ❑ ❑
Yes No NA NE
❑ • ❑ ❑
❑ • ❑ ❑
❑ • ❑ ❑
❑ • ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
❑ • ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
Page 5 of 5

Facility Number
"1-E0
• Division of Water Resources
0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation
0 Other Agency
Type of Visit: ® Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: 0 Routine 0 Complaint -,0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit:
Farm Name:
12i(p/2f
IUNG
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Arrival Time: 8)att- Departure Time:Ti��
tii
Pal/)31-�L LfV eriZ �- Ow
vn E ail:
V /q /sl t_. 11%1\S1s.0-c. LAN e.€1 one:
aiap-
County: ifs-rcayDID Region: A-taz
1-1%z,PL b4`v-e d-ca7 /(o
'Ditto tiles eta
Title:
Onsite Representative: tJ117.3 &ritrcje
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
ProSeD 1 O l b 3 Ca %
Latitude:
Integrator:
Phone:
Certification Number:
Certification Number:
rr as G5"/ 00 n
�-dr fs � �� Longitude:
Swine
Design Current
Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Boars
Other
Other
Design Current
Wet Poultry Capacity Pop.
Layer
Non -Layer
Design Current
Ca'acl Po..
Cattle
Design Current
Capacity Pop.
Dairy Cow
SSD
Dairy Calf
Dairy Heifer
Dry Cow
Non -Dairy
Beef Stocker
709
20'0
Beef Feeder
Beef Brood Cow
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. 1s any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
of the State other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes KNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes [ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes [54 o ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 1 of 3
2/4/2015 Continued

Facility Number: L. - ( $
Date of Inspection: G71lo/42-I
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (Structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
a. If yes, is wasteepvel into the structural freeboard?
De-'2 SIa S
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWR
❑ Yes $No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Stnicture 5 Structure 6
❑ Yes 191 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes 'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes iSNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need KYes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes 91No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN> 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
0 Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
eke. / ageitfrin -e-12 - lazy cozA/
12. Crop Type(s):
13. Soil Type(s):
❑ Yes gNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? if yes, check
the appropriate box.
IgIWUP ❑Checklists ❑Design ❑Maps 0 Lease Agreements
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard �$aste Analysis cgt.Soil Analysis
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
Page 2 of 3
❑ Yes %No
❑ Yes RNc
❑ Yes KNo
❑ Yes [ No
❑ Yes [A No
WI Yes ID No
ayes ❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NA
❑ NA
❑ NA
❑ NA
❑ NA
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ NE
❑ NE
❑ NE
❑ NE
❑ NE
❑ NE
❑Other:
gYes No ❑NA ❑NE
❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Weather Code
❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections ❑ Sludge Survey
❑ Yes 'i No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes 7:1.No ❑ NA ❑ NE
2/4/2015 Continued
I

Facility Number:
tar C
Date of Inspec
24. Did,the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
on: /Za/�o /2i
14 Yes ❑ No ❑ NA d NE
❑Yes giNo ❑NA ❑NE
❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification?
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NA
❑ NA
❑ NA
❑ NA
❑ Yes RNo ❑ NA
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
glNo
IANo
RNo
[sz No
tA.No
caYes ❑ No
❑Yes po
Wes ❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NA
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ NE
❑ NE
❑ NE
❑ NE
❑ NE
❑ NE
❑ NE
❑ NE
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations (use additional pages as necessary).
t✓ it-- A4a.6 -% c1zt $es %7c Gk.
t Ake Csace h«'r s fect oht.Yi}.Q We e%kt i✓ lleigna
�y hos o b 'Ice t1 ' - B rei r'1it,t?r3,.J ,
�(-o_ Li tz 3 67a j
#10Aror RMt geri'reS 1�¢ear-dt'-4t/q'f,t3/r fPa/2ni6
era y New a/si l ec0 do-kf �' '> ` � et4�W r-
1 l . o L4tJ tb ,4pp I C air) t
A woouU ih dudes bat Ivor he. lira,'. 70
(iJ1-19'/ ow, So; 1 St PtsJ Cet (e-rA/AM 0,/ eft
Prowl; p�eaJ A7; Peva1L0 iCt2ae vittadrY
3 C�rritaarS
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Page 3 of 3
�ctS.
W ft s s
G.y t`Y a' 0.kCG ( ?
Phone: Ga "2-6-4 o
/20 %2oz]
Date:
5/12/2020