440011_Inspection_20211119

Facility Number
I(
-'+ Division of Water Resources
0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation
0 Other Agency
Type of Visit: 0 Compliance Inspection 0
Reason for Visit: 0 Routine 0 Complaint
Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit RrillnArrival Time:I taw 4,,,LDeparture Time:
Farm Name:
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
IF L 2 cs
l) Ototrie,x ,Pcr
Physical Address: ` 5 / ts- E14 J ritigivAed
Facility Contact:
4�Op,(•tdti-of c
Onsite Representative: .
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Title:
ree)Gw4
Owner Email:
Phone:
County: '
VOSS.ihr 3/ g/
%20 -id-do -S266
Region:
/vJV,'//t_ Alt FS
al cedar- :Darc
-290167C-1^-• Latitude:
Integrator:
Phone:
l
7c4cec2. csve,
Certification Number:
Certification Number:
3Ed 05- Longitude: g0.
Swine
Design Current
Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Boars
Other
Other
Design Current
Wet Poultry Capacity Pop.
Layer
Non -Layer
Design Current
Dr v Poultry Cauacitv Pon.
Layers
Non -Layers
Pullets
Turkeys
Turkey Poults
Other
Cattle
Design Current
Capacity Pop.
Dairy Cow
Qmn
Dairy Calf
Dairy Heifer
Dry Cow
Non -Dairy
Beef Stocker
Beef Feeder
Beef Brood Cow
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
�of the State other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes cNo 0 NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes rgNo
❑ Yes cgNo
❑NA ❑NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
1 of3
2/4/2015 Con net

!Facility Number: CH - l/
Waste Collection & Treatment
(Date of Inspection: /q//q/n
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
❑ Yes 0 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
��,, Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: ( AIrs z- P�
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes 0 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes [iNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes 0 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes 10 No El NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes allo El NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes p. No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes EgNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
El PAN ❑ PAN> 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside ofAcceptable
�-Crop Window ❑ /Eviidenc`e of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): }end) S {l4p¢=.r 1/.t.1 Utat-a �i iti•=G fz �i�S/-Lr ° L. Hai/74— 4 .i%LCVe,
13.sod Type(s): I -leaf r°1l /U p7YtclB.ere4 ) SaMj 4c ) /c/eI%ovodl /9r`lerk&S-o
14. Do the receiving crops differf/from those designated in the CAWMP? ')'mil /I - ❑ Yes F No ❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yeso ❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes KI_No ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes O No ❑ NA ❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ NA El NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes [ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes [KNo El NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑Design ❑Maps ❑ Lease Agreements 0 Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes [ No ❑ NA El NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections ❑ Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? 0 Yes PSNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes 15No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

Facility Number: Y'-f -
Date of Inspection:
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
❑ Yes cil_No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NA
❑ NE
0 NE
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification?
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
❑ Yes ql.No
❑ Yes crNo
❑ Yes -No
❑ Yes fallo
❑ Yes [_No
❑ Yes
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
N
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes «No
❑ Yes KNo
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑NE
❑NA ❑NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations (use additional pages as necessary).
/WA 1 t Me) cpa.m. Wcp eeJ 11-4-
Y nyc..c Po SS /t-r Sr 6 Mad cia g.,}, CIA,_
iV ou elts- J of S J�r4� � � S (t_fr Cl art i
(fit vie— /a7& AO 1S•- -1 l lam,
Il' dsNc. 2-a19.
11-)e- dt'S sad 62-4-14cfrt-r"? 07.1 tier Need=d Ay eA4 a
tat yea-v ar-d -140- 4 I'M a//�Si,n, y. 4 I',Coilre.g ait
Ore lr e'f Urea Ok n c_ '7u fr Gc-o fi'e2
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Page 3 of 3
Date:
Phone: PO - Cry Wa=vl
iI/lgl)-I
5/12/2020

Division of Water Resources
Division of Soil and Water Conservation
Other Agency
Facility Number: 440011
Facility Status: Active
Permit: AWC440011 Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Inactive Or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine
County:
Haywood
Region:
Date of Visit: 11/19/2021 Entry Time: 10:00 am Exit Time: 11:00 am Incident #:
Farm Name: H. Dean Ross Farm
Owner Email:
Asheville
Owner: H Dean Ross Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 111 Owens Rd
Waynesville NC 287859668
Physical Address: 295 Holstein Farm Rd Waynesville NC 28785
Facility Status: Compliant Not Compliant Integrator:
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35° 35' 05°
Longitude: 83° 01' 18"
Joe Carver Rd. (SR 1322) off NC 276 Jonathan Creek, right on (SR 1323) Owens Road, right on Holstein Farm Rd.
Question Areas:
▪ Dischrge & Stream Impacts
▪ Records and Documents
▪ Waste Col, Stor, & Treat
▪ Other Issues
Waste Application
Certified Operator:
Secondary OIC(s):
Hobert D Ross
Operator Certification Number: 21954
On -Site Representative(s): Name
24 hour contact name Ronnie Ross
Title
Phone
828-507-3151
Primary Inspector:
Inspector Signature:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Timothy R Fox Phone: [phone]
Date:
Inspection Summary:
Tim Fox with ARO DWR inspected the site.
Ronnie Ross assisted during the inspection.
November 2015 Dairy Shut down.
6th year with no confined cattle.
No land application since spring 2016.
Soils done 2019.
We discussed certification hours needed by the end of the year and that Attachment A permit requirements
are not required until further notice.
Page 1 of 5

Permit: AWC440011
Inspection Date: 11/19/21
Owner: H Dean Ross
Facility Number: 440011
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Structures
Type
Identifier
Effective
Date
Built
Date
Closed Designated Observed
Date Freeboard Freeboard
Waste Pond
WASTE STORAGE POr
01/17/2000
D 1 /01 /1996
21.60
Page 2 of 5

Permit: AWC440011
Inspection Date: 11/19/21
Owner: H Dean Ross
Facility Number: 440011
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at:
Structure
Application Field
Other
a. Was conveyance man-made?
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the
State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e./ larc
trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
waste management or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicablE
to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
Hydraulic Overload?
Frozen Ground?
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
PAN?
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
Total Phosphorus?
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
Outside of acceptable crop window?
Evidence of wind drift?
Application outside of application area?
Crop Type 1
Yes No NA NE
❑ • ❑ ❑
❑ • ❑ ❑
❑ • ❑ ❑
Yes No NA NE
❑ • ❑ ❑
❑ • ❑ ❑
❑ • ❑ ❑
❑ • ❑ ❑
Yes No NA NE
❑ • ❑ ❑
Corn (Silage)
Page 3 of 5

Permit: AWC440011
Inspection Date: 11/19/21
Owner: H Dean Ross
Facility Number: 440011
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application Yes No NA NE
Crop Type 2 Fescue (Hay, Pasture)
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste
Management Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre
determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
Records and Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
Checklists?
Design?
Maps?
Lease Agreements?
Other?
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
Weekly Freeboard?
Waste Analysis?
Soil analysis?
Waste Transfers?
Weather code?
Rainfall?
Stocking?
Crop yields?
❑ • ❑ ❑
❑ • ❑ ❑
Yes No NA NE
❑ • ❑ ❑
❑• ❑ ❑
El
El
❑ • ❑ ❑
Page 4 of 5

Permit: AWC440011
Inspection Date: 11/19/21
Owner: H Dean Ross
Facility Number: 440011
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
120 Minute inspections?
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipmen
(NPDES only)?
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the
appropriate box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes,
contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit
(i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field
Lagoon / Storage Pond
Other
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or
CAW M P?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
Yes No NA NE
❑ • ❑ ❑
❑ • ❑ ❑
❑ • ❑ ❑
❑ • ❑ ❑
IEI
IEI
El
❑ • ❑ ❑
❑ • ❑ ❑
Yes No NA NE
❑ • ❑ ❑
❑ • ❑ ❑
❑ • ❑ ❑
❑ • ❑ ❑
❑ • ❑ ❑
❑ • ❑ ❑
❑ • ❑ ❑
Page 5 of 5

Picture
t
77 Vs
iflt

Picture