110006_Inspection_20211119

Facility Number
11
aro
O Division of Water Resources
O Division of Soll and Water Conservation
O Other Agency
Type of Visit: Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: 0 Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit:
Farm Name:
Owner Name:
/(/4r Arrival Time: AA!c29 eii4 Departure Time:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
/ V-c d71iz
/22creolsCounty: Atitbi,/to Region.
Owner Email:
&eO(�C_©�(le A- ` ,t -
th', ,1 ,,�� Phone: SZs -67V- 'S6—
• cp , ersta /c.c. 2 73.7
4. 16„ 1 see yen 8ieet fh- ()-ash. El
�cnc Rie-Mt
Onsite Representative: tokciAjegbet
Certified Operator: t /jhlr
W./eclat-6
Title:
Back-up Operator:
t !-Cw of R ZiTsSi f (Tri-dg
Location of Farm: Latitude: d;J +21'. 35
Integrator:
Phone:
S2$-- 627Y- bed
Certification Number:
Certification Number:
418 a-s55
Longitude: �. • • bC.
Swine
Design Current
Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Boars
Other
Other
Current
Design Current
Wet Poultry Capacity Pop.
Layer
Non -Layer
Design
Poultr Cai aci
Cattle
Design Current
Capacity Pop.
Dairy Cow
S,-C
Dairy Calf
EV-gig--
_
Dairy Heifer
Dry Cow
__
Non -Dairy
Beef Stocker
Beef Feeder
Beef Brood Cow
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
e. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
of the State other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes I_No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes [t No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes.No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page I of 3
2/4/20I5 Continued

'Facility Number: J[ - (�q
Waste Collection & Treatment
Date of Inspection: ///rN/y/
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
a. if yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
❑ Yea No ❑ NA ❑ NE
of Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
tructury 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
V
NV
5
Observed Freeboard (in)' a2 p (q..f 1t ,mot
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes l,[ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e., large trees severe erosion, seepage, etc.) 7�
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes VINo ❑NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes iStNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes tliNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
0 Excessive Ponding 0 Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN> 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus 0 Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s):
13. Soil Type(s):
C)
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes K'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes V,XNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑ WUP ['Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ['Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes 'YiNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and I" Rainfall Inspections 0 Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes '[ No ❑ NA fl NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes 'No ❑ NA 0 NE
Page 2 of 3
❑ Yes 0 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes VNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes 71No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes gETo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes gNo 0 NA ❑ NE
2/4/2015 Continued

Faa Number: // - ego
Date of Inspection:
KllY�zr I
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ Yes y N To ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes [No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
0 Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes [ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphoms loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes [ -No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes iNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes [ -No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes t1No ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application) T
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ElYes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes EiKi No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No ❑NA ❑NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments (refer to question if): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or anyother comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations (use additional pages as necessary).
wit?, lucre eci Ste.
1°"'7 wechi f torts Sea* d uv1 1 84.4p.eitha,3,
done 16(Zeal ) 4E ie 1N avb7
`Is AA() bar"- set hen Vet ( a-r)
wsa hhOdirim Provided P/<//zr tsD L )- 5-1/q/w zsc 2 ?D
tNs//i - 46'fl -7-' f
S aate.e4 h` d *17- Tina- (/ .) /WI /or /9
°Air %omit./
pt-?aad �2drt7?�3 hats- - tract
t
soli Gl n A" pond- r uf'reia . s /t4- re tt
cavnc-- 7uv M fig.
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Page 3 of 3
Phone
Date:
1(10124
2Y
5/12/2020

Division of Water Resources
Division of Soil and Water Conservation
Other Agency
Facility Number: 110006
Facility Status: Active
Permit: AWC110006 Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Inactive Or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine
County:
Buncombe
Region:
Date of Visit: 12/01/2020 Entry Time: 12:00 pm Exit Time: 1:00 pm Incident #:
Farm Name: T&C Dairy Owner Email:
Asheville
Owner: George A Nesbitt Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: PO Box 936
Physical Address: 440 Lower Brush Creek Rd
Facility Status: Compliant Not Compliant
Integrator:
Location of Farm: Latitude:
Fletcher NC 287320936
Fletcher NC 28732
35° 28' 35"
Longitude: 82° 26' 05"
436 Lower Brush Creek Rd, Fletcher. 4 miles SW of Fairview, 6 miles east of Fletcher, turn at Oak Baptist Church on to Lower
Brush Creek Rd. Go to dirt Rd 4th drive on left.
Question Areas:
▪ Dischrge & Stream Impacts
▪ Records and Documents
Waste Col, Stor, & Treat Waste Application
Certified Operator:
Secondary OIC(s):
George A Nesbitt
Operator Certification Number: 21355
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
Primary Inspector:
Inspector Signature:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Timothy R Fox Phone: [phone]
Date:
Inspection Summary:
Tim Fox with ARO inspected the site. Tony Nesbit assisted during the inspection.
Soils will be due in 2021.
Calibration records due by December 31, 2020.
We discussed the one year extension for credit hours for the 3 year period 2018-2020 to obtain 6 hours for recertification
purposes.
We also discussed Attachment A requirements which are not required until further resolution and notification.
Page 1 of 5

Permit: AWC110006
Owner: George A Nesbitt
Inspection Date: 12/01/20 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number: 110006
Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations
Design Capacity
Current promotions
Cattle
Cattle - Milk Cow
Waste Structures
Type
300
300
Identifier
Effective
Date
Total Design Capacity:
Total SSLW:
Built
Date
300
420,000
Closed Designated Observed
Date Freeboard Freeboard
Waste Pond
SLURRY POND
01 /01 /1996
D1/01/1989
22.80
Page 2 of 5

Permit: AWC110006
Inspection Date: 12/01/20
Owner: George A Nesbitt
Facility Number: 110006
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at:
Structure
Application Field
Other
a. Was conveyance man-made?
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the
State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e./ larc
trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
waste management or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicablE
to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
Hydraulic Overload?
Frozen Ground?
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
PAN?
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
Total Phosphorus?
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
Outside of acceptable crop window?
Evidence of wind drift?
Application outside of application area?
Crop Type 1
Yes No NA NE
❑ • ❑ ❑
❑ • ❑ ❑
❑ • ❑ ❑
Yes No NA NE
❑ • ❑ ❑
❑ • ❑ ❑
❑ • ❑ ❑
❑ • ❑ ❑
Yes No NA NE
❑ • ❑ ❑
Corn (Silage)
Page 3 of 5

Permit: AWC110006
Inspection Date: 12/01/20
Owner: George A Nesbitt
Facility Number: 110006
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Crop Type 2
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste
Management Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre
determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
Records and Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
Checklists?
Design?
Maps?
Lease Agreements?
Other?
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
Weekly Freeboard?
Waste Analysis?
Soil analysis?
Waste Transfers?
Weather code?
Rainfall?
Stocking?
Yes No NA NE
Small Grain (Wheat, Barley,
Oats)
Fescue (Hay)
❑ • ❑ ❑
❑ • ❑ ❑
❑ • ❑ ❑
Yes No NA NE
❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑
Page 4 of 5

Permit: AWC110006
Inspection Date: 12/01/20
Owner: George A Nesbitt
Facility Number: 110006
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Crop yields?
120 Minute inspections?
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipmen
(NPDES only)?
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the
appropriate box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
Yes No NA NE
❑ • ❑ ❑
❑ • ❑ ❑
❑ • ❑ ❑
❑ • ❑ ❑
❑ • ❑ ❑
❑ • ❑ ❑
Page 5 of 5