20140008 Ver 1_CAMA Application_20131223

20 1
NCDENR ,
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Coastal Management -
Pat McCrory
Governor
December 20, 2013
MEMORANDUM:
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
Applicant:
Project Location:
Braxton C. Davis
Director
Lby
Karen Higgins
Division of Water Resources
Doug Huggett
Major Permits Processing Coordinator
CAMA/DREDGE & FILL Permit Application Review
Ted & Jewell Ivey
1803 Hwy 24 along Bogue Sound, in Newport.
� 1 1
John E. Skvarla, III
Secretary
DEC 2 3 2013
Proposed Project: Proposes the removal of a four piling boatlift along the existing pier, the
replacement of the removed lift with a single pole jet -ski lift, as well as, the
construction of a second pier with platform and boatlifts along Bogue Sound.
Please indicate below your agency's position or viewpoint on the proposed project and return this form by
January 9, 2014. If you have any questions regarding the proposed project, please contact Heather Styron,
Permit officer at (252) 808 -2808. Ext. 216. When appropriate, in -depth comments with supporting data is
requested.
REPLY: This agency has no objection to the project as proposed.
This agency has no comment on the proposed project.
This agency approves of the project only if the recommended changes are
incorporated. See attached.
This agency objects to the project for reasons described in the attached comments.
SIGNED DATE
400 Commerce Ave., Morehead City, NC 28557
Phone: [phone] FAX: 252 - 247 -3330 Internet: www.necoastalmanagement.net
An Equal Opportunity 1 Affirmative Action Employer

DIVISION OF COASTAL MANAGEMENT
FIELD INVESTIGATION REPORT
1. APPLICANT'S NAME: Ted and Jewell Ivey
2. LOCATION OF PROJECT SITE: 1803 Highway 24 along Bogue Sound, in Newport,
Carteret County.
Photo Index - 2006: 41 -8046 grids G- 21 -22, H -21 -22
2000: 41 -517 grids Q -22, R -22
State Plane Coordinates - X: 2634320.71 Y: 362078.21
Longitude: 34 °43'34.79 Latitude: 76 °53'19.53
3. INVESTIGATION TYPE: CAMA
4. INVESTIGATIVE PROCEDURE: Dates of Site Visit - 12/10/13
Was Applicant Present — No
Photos Taken — Yes
5. PROCESSING PROCEDURE: Application Received:
Officially Submitted: 11/22/13
Complete — 12/9/13
Office - MHC
6. SITE DESCRIPTION:
(A) Local Land Use Plan — Carteret County- Certified 12/22/2010
Land Classification from LUP — Limited Transition/Conservation
(B) AEC(s) Involved: EW, PTA, CW
(C) Water Dependent: Yes
(D) Intended Use: Private
(E) Wastewater Treatment: Existing — Onsite Septic System
Planned - None
(F) Type of Structures: Existing — House, driveway, 2 -slip docking facility,
retaining wall
Planned- high ground boardwalk, replacement of existing
boatlift on existing pier with a jetski single pole lift, the
_addition of a two -slip new pier with platform and two new
slips with boatlifts along Bogue Sound.
(G) Estimated Annual Rate of Erosion: N/A
Source — N/A
7. HABITAT DESCRIPTION:
DRFDGF,D FH.T,RD 0T1RF,R
(A) Open,Water ( not over SAV)
N/A
N/A
96ft2 Shaded
494 ft2 Inc.
(B) Coastal Wetlands (low marsh)
N/A
N/A
75 ft2 Shaded
(C) Coastal Wetlands (high marsh)
N/A
N/A
100 ft2 Shaded
(D) High Ground
N/A
N/A
420 ft2 Shaded
(E) Open water (over SAV)
N/A
N/A
2,270 ft2 Shaded
2,270 ft2 Inc.

Field Investigation Report
Ted and Jewell Ivey
1803 highway 24
Page 2 of 3
(D) Total Area Disturbed: 3,359 ft'
(E) Primary Nursery Area: No
(F) Water Classification: HQW /SA Open: Yes
8. Project Summary:
The proposed project is for the removal of a four piling boatlift along the existing pier, the
replacement of the removed lift with a single pole jet -ski lift as well as the construction of
a second pier with platform and boatlifts along Bogue Sound.
9. Narrative DescriQtion:
The Ted and Jewell Ivey project is located at 1803 highway 24 within Newport, Carteret
County. The site is found by following highway 24 east past the Gales Creek Bridge. It is
approximately 3,503' (.66 miles) east of the gales creek bridge. You will turn south onto
the existing driveway which is distinguished by a black rod iron type fence with stone
columns.
The residential property is 5.9 acres (257,004sf) in its entirety and 9' above nhw. Bogue Sound
runs along the south side of the property. The upland vegetation mainly consists of lawn
grasses, shrubs, palms and oak trees. There is a 50' x 324'section of coastal wetlands along the
324' of shoreline on Bogue Sound. The waters of Bogue Sound have approximately 2.5'to 3'
lunar tidal amplitude.
The Division of Water Quality classifies this area as HQW /SA Waters. This area of Bogue
Sound is not designated as a Primary Nursery Area and is open to the taking of shellfish. The
Carteret County Land Use Plan classifies this area as Limited Transition with Conservation
within the AECs. Although the ICWW is located approximately 1,403' from the proposed pier
there is a historic channel that is utilized within this area. This channel would be located
approximately 580' from all proposed development. Water depths within this project location
are - 2.5'nlw /mlw with connecting water depths of -3' plus nlw /mlw. The bottom substrate is
sand. Bogue Sound is approximately 11,500' wide at this location.
10) Proposed Development:
The applicant wishes to remove a four pole boatlift on the existing pier and replace with a
single pole jet -ski lift as well as construct a boardwalk and second longer pier on the
western portion of the property. There is an existing shorter (210') 2 -slip docking facility
along the eastern portion of the property; however, due to the shallow water depths and
SAV habitat, the applicants are asking for the construction of an additional 454' pier,
platform and slips with boatlifts along Bogue Sound for the western side. This area has a
smaller span of SAV habitat and deeper water depths. The only change that would occur
on the existing eastern docking facility would be the removal of the existing boatlift and
replacing it with a 7' x 10' single pole jet -ski lift.

Field Investigation Report
Ted and Jewell Ivey
1803 highway 24
Page 3 of 3
Due to the shallow water depths over SAV habitat and the location of the existing eastern
shorter pier, which is located over a sandy shoaled SAV area with water depths < 1' nlw,
the applicant is proposing a second longer (5' x 454' from the edge of marsh) pier along
the western portion of the property. In order to achieve the necessary depths to span this
shallow SAV habitat, the pier would need to exceed 400' from the edge of marsh. The
water depths from 400' to 467' would maintain the required rate of 1' of fall as well as the
deeper water depths ( >2' nlw) over the SAV habitat. The pier would intersect an 8' x 12'
T -head platform with a 13' x 13' boatlift to the east as well as one to the west of the
platform. The most waterward portion of the boatlifts would not exceed a maximum
distance of 467' from the edge of marsh. All parts of the docking facility would be
landward of the historical channel (approximately 575' landward) and a distance of 36'
from the western riparian corridor and 71' from the eastern riparian corridor. There would
be a total of four slips (2 spaces at the existing pier and 2 new along the new pier). The
water depths within the new slip areas for the proposed western dock are -2.5' nlw /mlw
with connecting water depths of -3' plus nlw /mlw. There are piers along the shoreline to
the east and west of this property that extend farther offshore than this proposal.
11. Anticipated Impacts:
The proposed dock would shade and incorporate 2270 ft2 of shallow bottom SAV habitat,
shade 96 Wand incorporate 494 ft2 of open water (non SAV), shade 100 ft2 of high marsh
and 75 ft2 of low marsh. The development would increase the number of slips to a total of
4 (2 existing and 2 new). The placement of the jet -ski lift within the existing slip area
along the existing eastern pier has the potential to reduce impacts due to the smaller size
(removal of larger boatlift). The proposed placement of the western new pier, platform and
boat lifts would reduce the likelihood of prop scarring and incidental prop dredging of the
existing SAV habitat. The deeper water depths ( >- 2'nlw) within the new pier location and
the shorter distance that the applicants would need to traverse in order to reach the deeper
water has the potential to help preserve and re- establish the SAV habitat closer inland. The
increase in suspended sediment and turbidity levels from the pier placement would be
temporary, occur while the pier placement is taking place and should be minimal given the
bottom composition. The location of the proposed docking facility should not be a
hindrance to navigation due to the fact all portions would be located landward of the
historical channel (575') however it is recommended to add reflectors (meeting Coast
Guard Standards) for safety due to the proposed length.
Name: Heather M. Styron Date: 12/20/13 Office: Morehead City

Major CAMA Permit Application
- Ted -and Jewel Ivey
1803 Highway 24
Newport, North Carolina
November 22, 2013
Prepared by:
Coastal Planning Services, Inc.
P.O. Box 827
Morehead City, North Carolina 28557
Telephone 252 - 354 -4916
REMTMD
NOV 2 2 2013

Ted and Jewel Ivey
Major CAMA Permit Application
Modification of Existing Pier /Proposed New Pier
Contents
Application Documents
DCM MP —1 Application
DCM MP — 4 Structures
Project Narrative
Introduction
Site Description
Project Description
Construction Methods
Authorized Agent letter
Property Deed
Notification to Adjacent Riparian Property owners
Project Plans
Sheet 1 of 1
D
RECEWED
NOV 2 2 2013
DCU- MHDCrry

NE x-11
NPLICATION for
major Development Permit
(last revised 12/27/06)
North Carolina DIVISION OF COASTAL MANAGEMENT
1, Primary Applicant/ Landowner Information
Business Name
Project Name (if applicable)
N/A
WA
Applicant 1: First Name
MI
Last Name
Jewel
H
Ivey
Applicant 2: First Name
MI
Last Name
Ted
E
Ivey
If additional applicants, please attach an additional page(s)
with names listed.
Mailing Address
PO Box
City
State
229 NC Highway 111 South
N/A
Goldsboro
NC
ZIP
Country
Phone No.
FAX No.
27534
USA
919 - 778 -2465 ext. N/A
N/A - -
Street Address (if different from above)
City
State
ZIP
N/A
FAX No.
Contractor #
-
Email
[e-mail]
2. Agent/Contractor Information
Business Name
Coastal Planning Services, Inc.
Agent/ Contractor 1: First Name
MI
Last Name
Kathy
B
Vinson
Agent/ Contractor 2: First Name
MI
Last Name
N/A
Mailing Address
PO Box
City
State
827
Morehead City
NC
ZIP
Phone No. 1
Phone No. 2
28557 0827
252 -240- 9297 ext. N/A
252 - 354 - 4916 ext. N/A
FAX No.
Contractor #
252 247 5876
N/A
Street Address (if different from above)
City
State
ZIP
N/A
-
Email
kbvinson @ec.rr.com
<Form continues on back>
IRECEMD
NOV 2 2 2013
DCfW-YfflDCffy

Form DCM MP -1 (Page 2 of 5)
APPLICATION for
Major Development Permit
3. Project Location
County (can be multiple)
Street Address
State Rd. #
Carteret
1803 Highway 24
N/A
Subdivision Name
City
State
Zip
WA
Newport
I NC
28570-
Phone No.
Lot No.(s) (if many, attach additional page with list)
N/A - - ext.
N /A, I I ,
a. In which NC river basin is the project located?
b. Name of body of water nearest to proposed project
White Oak
Bogue Sound
c. Is the water body identified in (b) above, natural or manmade?
d. Name the closest major water body to the proposed project site.
®Natural ❑Manmade []Unknown
Bogue Sound
e. Is proposed work within city limits or planning jurisdiction?
f. If applicable, list the planning jurisdiction or city limit the proposed
-[!Ye s- ONO
work falls within. -
Carteret County
4. Site Description
a. Total length of shoreline on the tract (ft.)
b. Size of entire tract (sq.ft.)
324
257,004
c. Size of individual lot(s)
d. Approximate elevation of tract above NHW (normal high water) or
N /A, I I
NWL (normal water level)
(if many lot sizes, please attach additional page with a list)
+91 ®NHW or ❑NWL
e. Vegetation on tract
Mature trees, grass, landscape vegetation, coastal wetlands
f. Man -made features and uses now on tract
Single - family residence, garage, block retaining wall, pier with boat lift and jet ski lift
g. Identify and describe the existing land uses adiacen t to the proposed project site.
Residential
h. How does local government zone the tract?
i. Is the proposed project consistent with the applicable zoning?
R -20
(Attach zoning compliance certificate, if applicable)
®Yes []No ❑NA
j. Is the proposed activity part of an urban waterfront redevelopment proposal? Yes J@No
k. Has a professional archaeological assessment been done for the tract? If yes, attach a copy. ❑Yes ONO ONA
If yes, by whom? N/A
I. Is the proposed project located in a National Registered Historic District or does lt involve a 0Yes CgNo ONA
National Register fisted or eligible property?
<Form continues on next uaae>
m. (i) Are there wetlands on the
(ii) Are there coastal wetlands on the site?
(iii) If yes to either (i) or (ii) above, has a delineation been conducted?
(Attach documentation, if available)
®Yes []NO NOV 2 2 2013
❑Yes ONO

Form DCM MP -1 (Page 3 of 5)
n. Describe existing wastewater treatment facilities.
Individual septic system
o. Describe existing drinking water supply source
Water service provided by West Carteret Water Corporation
p. Describe existing storm water management or treatment systems.
None
APPLICATION for
Major Development Permit
5. Activities and Impacts
a. Will the project be for commercial, public, or private use? ❑Commercial ❑PublictGovemment
®Private /Community
b. Give a brief description of purpose, use, and daily operations of the project when complete.
The project will provide water/boating access for owners of the property and their guests.
c. Describe the proposed construction methodology, types of construction equipment to be used during construction, the number of each type
of equipment and where it is to be stored.
One barge with pile- driving equipment will be used for construction of dock and will be stored in deep water. Construction of
the elevated walkway will employ conventional methods.
d. List all development activities you propose.
Construction of a new pier with platform, two boatlifts, and associated highground elevated walkway; replacement of boatlift
on existing pier with a jet -ski lift.
e. Are the proposed activities maintenance of an existing project, new work, or both? New
f. What is the approximate total disturbed land area resulting from the proposed project? 1000 ®Sq Ft or []Acres
g. Will the proposed project encroach on any public easement, public acoessway or other area SYes EJNo NA
that the public has established use of?
h. Describe location and type of existing and proposed discharges to waters of the state
Sheet flow run -off to Bogue Sound.
i. Will wastewater or stormwater be discharged into a wetland? Yes ONo NA
If yes, will this discharged water be of the same salinity as the receiving water? E]Yes []No ®NA
j. Is there any mitigation proposed? ElYes ®No NA RECE
If yes, attach a mitigation proposal.
<Form continues on back>
NOV 22 2013
6. Additional Information �
In addition to this completed application form, (MP -1) the following items below, if applicable, must be submitted in order for the app cation
package to be complete. Items (a) — (f) are always applicable to any major development application. Please consult the application
instruction booklet on how to property prepare the required items below.
a. A project narrative.
b. An accurate, dated work plat (including plan view and cross - sectional drawings) drawn to scale Please give the present status of the
proposed project. Is any portion already complete? If previously authorized work, clearly indicate on maps, plats, drawings to distinguish
between work completed and proposed.
c. A site or location map that is sufficiently detailed to guide agency personnel unfamiliar with the area to the site.

Form DCM MP -1 (Page 4 of 5)
APPLICATION for
Major Development Permit
d. A copy of the deed (with state application only) or other instrument under which the applicant claims title to the affected properties.
e. The appropriate application fee. Check or money order made payable to DENR.
f. A list of the names and complete addresses of the adjacent waterfront (riparian) landowners and signed return receipts as proof that such
owners have received a copy of the application and plats by certified mail. Such landowners must be advised that they have 30 days in
which to submit comments on the proposed pro/ect to the Division of Coastal Management.
Name Lynn Turner Lee
Phone No
Address 5864 Sapony Creek Drive, Nashville, NC 27856
Name Elmer T. Sprinkle, III
Phone No.
Address 243 Deep Bay Drive, Newport, NC 28570
Name
Phone No
Address
g. A list of previous state or federal permits issued for work on the project tract Include permit numbers, permittee, and issuing dates.
CAMA'General Permit 22296, issued to Ted and Bob Ivey, 6/23/99
h. Signed consultant or agent authorization form, if applicable.
1. Wetland delineation, if necessary
j. A signed AEC hazard notice for projects in oceanfront and inlet areas. (Must be signed by property owner)
k. A statement of compliance with the N C. Environmental Policy Act (N C.G S 113A1-10), if necessary. If the project involves expenditure
of public funds or use of public lands, attach a statement documenting compliance with the North Carolina Environmental Policy Act.
1 7. Certfcation and Permission to Enter on Land
I understand that any permit issued in response to this application will allow only the development described in the application.
The project will be subject to the conditions and restrictions contained in the permit.
I certify that I am authorized to grant, and do in fact grant permission to representatives of state and federal review agencies to
enter on the aforementioned lands in connection with evaluating information related to this permit application and follow -up
monitoring of the project.
I further certify that the information provided in this application is truthful to the best of my knowledge.
Date _November 22 2013 Print Name _Kathy B. Vinson
Signature U
Please indicate application attachments pertaining to your proposed project.
❑DCM MP -2 Excavation and Fill Information ❑DCM MP -5 Bridges and Culverts
❑DCM MP -3 Upland Development
®DCM MP-4 Structures Information
NOV 222013
DCU MFID CTPY

Form DCM MP -1 (Page 5 of 5) APPLICATION for
Major Development Permit
RECEPf1ED
NOV 2 2 2013
Dcu- mocrrY

Form DCM MP-4
STRUCTURES
(Construction within Public Trust Areas)
Attach this form to Joint Application for CAMA Major Permit, Form DCM MP -1. Be sure to complete all other sections of the Joint
Application that relate to this proposed project. Please include all supplemental information.
1. DOCKING FACILITY/MARINA CHARACTERISTICS ❑This section not applicable
a. (i) Is the docking facility /marina: b. (i) Will the facility be open to the general public?
❑Commercial ❑Public/Govemment ®Prmate/Community []Yes ®No
c. - (i) Dock(s) and/or pier(s) d.
(ii) Number one proposed dock plus one existing dock
(ill) Length proposed = 454'. existing = 219
(iv) Width proposed = 5'. existing = 5'
(v) Floating []Yes ®No
e. () Are Platforms included? ®Yes []No
If yes:
(i) Number proposed dock =1, existing dock =1
(iii) Length proposed dock= 8'. existing dock =16'
(iv) Width proposed dock= 12'. existing dock =14'
(v) Floating []Yes ®No
Note: Roofed areas are calculated from dripline dimensions.
g. (i) Number of slips proposed
2
(ii) Number of slips existing
2
i. Check the proposed type of siting:
❑ Land cut and access channel
[]Open water, dredging for basin and/or channel
®Open water, no dredging required
❑Other, please describe:
k. Typical boat length: 25' or less
m. () Will the facility have tie pilings?
[]Yes ®No
(ii) If yes number of tie pilings?
N/A
f.
(i) Are Finger Piers included? ❑Yes ®No -
If yes:
(i) Number
(ii) Length
(iv) Width
(v) Floating ❑Yes []No
(i) Are Boatli is included? ®Yes ❑No
If yes:
(ii) Number 2 boatlifts and one sinale-pole„jet ski lift
are proposed plus one eAstina sinale -Dole let ski lift
(iii) Length 13'
(iv) Width 13'
h. Check all the types of services to be provided.
❑ Full service, including travel lift and/or rail, repair or
maintenance service
❑ Dockage, fuel, and marine supplies
0 Dockage Net slips") only, number of slips: 4
❑ Dry storage; number of boats:
❑ Boat ramp(s); number of boat ramps:
❑ Other, please describe:
j. Describe the typical boats to be served (e.g., open runabout,
charter boats, sail boats, mixed types).
Open runabout
RECMW
NOV 2 2 2013
I. (i) Will the facility be open to the general public? 1DC1V- .M
❑Yes ®No
2. DOCKING FACILITY /MARINA OPERATIONS 0 This section not applicable
�r

Form ®CM MP -4 (Structures, Page 2 of 4)
a. Check each of the following sanitary facilities that will be included in the proposed projecL
❑ Office Toilets
❑ Toilets for patrons; Number: ; Location:
❑ Showers
❑ Boatholding tank pumpout; Give type and location:
b. Describe treatment type and disposal location for all sanitary wastewater.
None
c. Describe the disposal of solid waste, fish offal and trash.
Waste receptacles located on high ground
d. How will overboard discharge of sewage from boats be controlled?
None
e. (I) Give the location and number of "No Sewage Discharge* signs proposed.
None
(ii) Give the location and number of " Pumpout Available" signs proposed.
None
f. Describe the special design, if applicable, for containing industrial type pollutants, such as paint, sandblasting waste and petroleum products.
N/A
g. Where will residue from vessel maintenance be disposed of?
None
h• Give the number of channel markers and "No Wake" signs proposed. None
i. Give the location of fuel- handling facilities, and describe the safety measures planned to protect area water quality.
None
j. What will be the marina policy on overnight and live- aboard dockage?
None
k. Describe design measures that promote boat basin flushing?
None
I. If this project is an expansion of an existing marina, what types of services are currently provided? RBCE M
Not an existing marina r`
NOV 2 2 2013
m. Is the marina/docking facility proposed within a primary or secondary nursery area?
❑Yes ®No
n. Is the marina/docking facility proposed within or adjacent to any shellfish harvesting area? DCM MHD CY
❑Yes ®No
o. Is the marina/docking facility proposed within or adjacent to coastal wetlands/marsh (CW), submerged aquatic vegetation (SAV), shell bottom
(SB), or other wetlands (WL)? If any boxes are checked, provide the number of square feet affected.
®CW existing = 81 sf shaded. proposed = 90 sf shaded ®SAV existina =1520 sf shaded. proposed= 2365 sf shaded
❑SB
OWL ❑None

Form DCM MP -4 (Structures, Page 3 of 4)
p. Is the proposed marina/docking facility located within or within dose proximity to any shellfish leases? []Yes ®No
If yes, give the name and address of the leaseholder(s), and give the proximity to the lease
N/A
3. BOATHOUSE (including covered lifts) ®This section not applicable
a. (i) Is the boathouse structure(s):
OCommercial []PublidGovemment []Private /Community
(ii) Number
(iii) Length
(iv) Width
Note: Roofed areas are calculated from dripline dimensions.
4. GROIN (e.g., wood, sheetpi /e, etc. If a rock groin, use MP -2, Excavation and Fill.) ®This section not applicable
a• (i) Number
(ii) Length
(iii) Width
5. BREAKWATER (e.g., wood, sheetpile, etc.) ®This section not applicable
a. Length b Average distance from NHW, NWL, or wetlands
c. Maximum distance beyond NHW, NWL or wetlands
16. MOORING PILINGS and BUOYS ®This section not applicable
a. Is the structure(s):
[]Commercial OPublic/Govemment []Private /Community
C. Distance to be placed beyond shoreline
Note: This should be measured from marsh edge, if present.
e. Arc of the swing
T. GENERAL
a. Proximity of structure(s) to adjacent riparian property lines
71' to east, 36' to west
b• Number
d. Description of buoy (color, inscription, size, anchor, etc.)
b. Proximity of structure(s) to adjacent docking facilities.
237' to east, 473' to west
Note: For buoy or mooring piling, use arc of swing including length
Of vessel.
c. Width of water body d. Water depth at waterward end of structure at NLW or NWL
+/- 13.000' - 2' NLW at progosed dock
e. Q) Will navigational aids be required as a result of the project?
[]Yes ®No []NA NOV 2 2 2013
(i) If yes, explain what type and how they will be implemented.
N/A DCVMHDCny
8. OTHER 0 This section not applicable

Form ®CM MP -4 (Structures, Page 4 of 4)
a. Give complete description:
Due to the relatively high elevation of the parcel, an elevated slatted walkway will provide pedestrian access from the
highground onto the proposed pier. The walkway is shown on project plans and will be in two sections measuring 46'x 5' and
38' x 5'.
November 22, 2013
Date
Project Name
Jewel and Ted Ivey
Applicant Name
Ap icant Sign re
RECEM {
NOV 2 2 2013
D�'V.Wc1TY

Ted and Jewel Ivey
Carteret County
Project Narrative
Introduction
Ted and Jewel Ivey are the owners of a single - family residential parcel located at 1803 Highway
24 in Carteret County adjacent Bogue Sound. The project site includes an existing pier with one
boat lift and one single -pole jet -ski lift.
Mr. and Mrs. Ivey propose to replace the existing boat lift with a single -pole jet -ski lift and
construct a second pier with associated highground walkway, platform, and two boat lifts.
Site Description
The Ivey property consists of 5.9 acres. It fronts both Bogue Sound and Highway 24 and is zoned
by Carteret County for residential use. An existing residence and detached garage are being
renovated. The project site is accessible from a driveway that runs from Highway 24 to the
house at the waterward end of the parcel. The portion of the parcel adjacent Highway 24 is
wooded, with the area immediately surrounding the house containing landscape vegetation
and grass. A number of mature trees are located along the waterfront and elsewhere on the
property. A fringe of coastal wetlands ranging in width from about 15' to 25' is found along the
shoreline of the property.
An existing block retaining wall is located along a portion of the waterfront and landward of a
grassy lawn area and the fringe of coastal wetlands. The shoreline along Normal High Water
(NHW) measures 324'.
The existing pier is located on the east side of the property. It is 210' in length, measured from
the waterward edge of marsh, and is 5' in width. The docking facility contains a roofed platform
measuring 16' x 14' at the waterward end, with steps into the water to access an existing boat
lift located on the eastern side. A single -pole jet -ski lift is located at the western end of the
platform.
The existing pier length is consistent with the pier head line along this shoreline, as shown on
aerial photographs. Normal Low Water (NLW) depths at the waterward end of the existing pier
measure less than -1.0. Submerged aquatic vegetation (SAV) is observed in the area adjacent
Ted and Jewel Ivey
Major CAMA Permit Application RECEIVED
November 22, 2013 Page 1
NOV 2 2 2013
DCM MHD CITY

and waterward of the pier, with a sandbar visible approximately 80' to 100' waterward of the
existing pier. Photographs taken from the existing pier clearly show scrape marks through
SAV's caused by boats attempting to navigate the shallow water in the pier head vicinity.
An historic channel used by local residents to access deep water is visible on aerial photos of
the area. The location and orientation of the historic channel were used to determine the
riparian corridor for the Ivey project site and adjacent properties. The Intracoastal Waterway is
located approximately 835' beyond the edge of the deep water historic channel.
The highground topography is relatively flat, with an approximate elevation of + 9' NHW that
slopes to the water at the shoreline. The waters of Bogue Sound at the project site are
classified as SA HQW by the Environmental Management Commission and are open to the
harvesting of shellfish. Bogue Sound is approximately 13,000 feet wide at the project site. There
are no shellfish leases adjacent to or within close proximity of the project.
Several large single - family residential parcels are located to the west along Bogue Sound. Deep
Bay, a single - family residential subdivision, is located immediately to the east of the Ivey
property. Elmer Sprinkle is the adjacent riparian property owner to the east. Lynn Turner Lee is
the adjacent riparian property owner to the west.
Project Description
The owners propose to modify the existing pier located on the eastern portion of the property.
They also propose to build a new pier with highground elevated walkways, platform, and two
boat lifts to the west of the existing pier.
The existing pier currently includes one boat lift and one single -pole jet -ski lift. The owners
propose to replace the existing boat lift with another single -pole jet -ski lift. They plan to utilize
the existing dock as a pedestrian pier and for dockage of jet -skis, thus lessening the impact to
resources from boat traffic. They propose to relocate their full -size boat to the new, longer
dock with boat slips located in deeper water (minimum of -2' NLW) than found at the existing
dock.
The new pier will measure 454' x 5' and will be located to the west of the existing pier. A t-
head platform measuring 8' x 12' will be positioned at the waterward end, with two boatlifts
measuring 13' x 13' located adjacent the platform. The new pier will be accessed by means of
Ted and jewel Ivey RECEMED
Major CAMA Permit Application
November 22, 2013 NOV 2 2 2013 Page 2
DCM- MffD CrrY

two elevated, slatted walkways located on high ground. The walkways will measure 46'x 5' and
38' x 5' as shown on project plans and are necessitated by the relatively high elevation of the
high ground portion of the property. The pier will be elevated a minimum of 3' above the
substrate as it crosses over the wetlands along the shoreline.
The new pier will be utilized by full -size boats (typically 25' or less), with the existing shorter
pier used for pedestrian and jet -ski access. Placement of the new pier was determined by the
location of normal low water depths of -2' NLW at the point closest to shore, thus limiting as
much as possible the new pier length.
The length of the proposed pier will exceed the existing pier head line along this shoreline.
However, because NLW depths at the end of the proposed pier measure -2', the owners are
requesting that the proposed pier be used to establish a new pier head line. This area of Bogue
Sound is characterized by shallow water, shoals, and SAVs, while pier length has been
controlled by the length of existing piers that typically end in less than -2' NLW. By establishing
a longer pier head line, boat traffic through shallow shoal /SAV areas will be avoided at the Ivey
site, thus minimizing/reducing impacts to SAVs. As shown on the attached photos (taken while
standing on the existing shorter pier located in -1' NLW), adherence to the existing pier head
line does not minimize impact to resources.
The proposed dock will not encroach into the federal channel setback, as designated by the US
Army Corps of Engineers. At its closest point, the waterward end of the dock will be
approximately1405' landward of the edge of the federal channel. Since Bogue Sound is about
13,000' wide at this point, the proposed pier length is consistent with the one - quarter width
rule.
The new and modified piers will also comply with the 15' setback from adjacent riparian
corridors. On the east, the existing dock is 71' from the riparian corridor. The proposed dock
will be located 36' from the western riparian corridor.
The proximity of the proposed dock to the adjacent docking facility is 473' on the west. The
existing dock on the east of the property is 237' from the next pier on the east.
The project also includes repair or replacement of existing components of the existing dock and
platform, as may be needed.
Ted and Jewel Ivey
Major CAMA Permit Application RECEIVED
November 22, 2013 Page 3
NOV 22 2013
DCM.MHDCrrY

Construction Methods
Conventional marine construction methodology will be employed. A barge with pile- driving
equipment will be used for construction of the docking facility. The barge will be stored in deep
water. The highground walkways will be built using conventional wood framing methods.
Ted and Jewel Ivey
Major CAMA Permit Application
November 22, 2013 f Page 4
NOV 2 2 2013
0 d
1�I,.,

NOV 2 2 2013

NI0v2221 01

tjau�l 1 iAuEa �pualo
_ - - fly" 3,1,yM - bfPJ
S3 t
f
�
I q E
� t
Of v 0 JC
tv. I E
AL
Vw
. � s � @ —
cl
Ol
� s
IL i
a - `,?
x
x€
F i C4 i x
t.t i 1 x }
QQ-'
4
C4
;
m
?
0
i C)
y
co
z3.
�
33
fn
1D- -
o
� �
3
CD
3.
L _:
[
ai
J
I
3j
CD M
I
3
I
x
v3
'
7
_
� �
3
� -ito
-k OXX
fUE [
I
t
i
!
:
'
Y� r
•L
St`
02 t
r ', i 3 x
!
x
A
x
x
IL i
a - `,?
x
x€
F i C4 i x
t.t i 1 x }
10 - t
IV
Cl) E ti I! ' �g L a. j x
L-
a } X rte. .,�, ` ! i •�;
11 IL X $
_ x 4 2€
1
x aaa a
oce
too (1) -�f x v
, L A
Cu
[ _ —�
' x x E L? tx n `x r i
l X
LU v _ [ LU C
�t 0
g 4
€E Z u—I
v
# 1 O 3 �\ !
C Z vi x x CV 3
( i [
_, . # ' °
�.-
'� _
x
[ Sm il'G �: rte+" Ss 3 l r ar i7n uJ ! N4
o
Ty, _ e
i +} c 3 - _
-0 .S _d :,�1 Ti. £�. '}
> i bJ "'if ^`V S1 s..,t f` i'°d 3 > � ; i
;? iii _ _ Cs`) t q „
�-- _
CD z
cz
,; t [- CQ ! rya
t ° 11 c cq x �.
co
x i t
! Cd ! x
ti- :st x
_ s x tO 4 X _ [
^?
s f x c l !
Lij 0)
0
C5 z*
-.:; Fy • _ • : - . It - ,3 -7 E`!
s ?
�''��� X
CL
all co
tfi
;f
O
_ [ X F
x !
! t ¢ t
/ � '� ttt��^+� t � °— 3 �
c� + .-
CO M
-•� 159
W
v LIJ c�
CD
cc
�.- ` W
W
r ' z <0 OM
0
( Ld a-
/ �y 0 i - jE Ja° '-
i < :2 �o W
T- i t'
— CO
Iz
F,
Q LIJ
l
4
C4
;
m
C }
L`
10 - t
IV
Cl) E ti I! ' �g L a. j x
L-
a } X rte. .,�, ` ! i •�;
11 IL X $
_ x 4 2€
1
x aaa a
oce
too (1) -�f x v
, L A
Cu
[ _ —�
' x x E L? tx n `x r i
l X
LU v _ [ LU C
�t 0
g 4
€E Z u—I
v
# 1 O 3 �\ !
C Z vi x x CV 3
( i [
_, . # ' °
�.-
'� _
x
[ Sm il'G �: rte+" Ss 3 l r ar i7n uJ ! N4
o
Ty, _ e
i +} c 3 - _
-0 .S _d :,�1 Ti. £�. '}
> i bJ "'if ^`V S1 s..,t f` i'°d 3 > � ; i
;? iii _ _ Cs`) t q „
�-- _
CD z
cz
,; t [- CQ ! rya
t ° 11 c cq x �.
co
x i t
! Cd ! x
ti- :st x
_ s x tO 4 X _ [
^?
s f x c l !
Lij 0)
0
C5 z*
-.:; Fy • _ • : - . It - ,3 -7 E`!
s ?
�''��� X
CL
all co
tfi
;f
O
_ [ X F
x !
! t ¢ t
/ � '� ttt��^+� t � °— 3 �
c� + .-
CO M
-•� 159
W
v LIJ c�
CD
cc
�.- ` W
W
r ' z <0 OM
0
( Ld a-
/ �y 0 i - jE Ja° '-
i < :2 �o W
T- i t'
— CO
Iz
F,
Q LIJ
l
11
4
;
co
i[
fn
�>
o
� �
3
3.
L _:
[
ai
J
I
3j
CD M
I
3
I
v3
'
7
_
� �
3
� -ito
fUE [
I
t
i
!
:
0 `
a 0
0i_
11
co
11