20211836 Ver 1_401 Application_20211220

Preliminary ORM Data Entry Fields for New Actions
last
SAW — 201 - 202100263 BEGIN DATE [Received Date]:
Prepare file folder 0 Assign Action ID Number in ORM ❑
1. Project Name [PCN Form A2a]: Shepherd's Farm (Belk Residential)
2. Work Type: Private Institutional ❑ Government ❑ Commercial ❑
3. Project Description / Purpose [PCN Form 63d and 133e]:
The project involves the development of 443 single family homes, an amenity area, 10 scm's, and
walking trails.
4. Property owner / Applicant [PCN Form A3 or A4]: 11 parcels / Caballero Holdings LLC Mr. George Harvey
5. Agent / Consultant [PCN Form A5 — or ORM Consultant ID Number]: Atlas Environmental / Jennifer Robertson
6. Related Action ID Number(s) [PCN Form 135b]: no other known Action ID's
7. Project Location - Coordinates, Street Address, and/or Location Description [PCN Form B1b]:
120 Belk Road Mooresville, NC 28115 4658579750, 4658468604
35.632213 /-80.826312 4659407004, 4658495222, 4658585819, 4658895336, 4659705087
8. Project Location -Tax Parcel ID [PCN Form 131a]: 4659704103, 4658792995, 4659702086, 4659503669
9. Project Location —County [PCN Form A2b]: Iredell
10. Project Location — Nearest Municipality or Town [PCN Form A2c]: Mooresville
11. Project Information — Nearest Waterbody [PCN Form 62a]: Cornelius Creek - WS-IV
12. Watershed / 8-Digit Hydrologic Unit Code [PCN Form 62d: Upper Catawba, 03050101
Authorization: Section 10 ❑ Section 404 ❑✓ Section 10 & 404
Regulatory Action Type:
Standard Permit Pre -Application Request
✓ Nationwide Permit # 29 ❑ Unauthorized Activity
❑ Regional General Permit # ❑ Compliance
❑ Jurisdictional Determination Request ❑ No Permit Required
RECEIVED
0 E C 2 0 2021
D7- WATER RESOURCES
I & JFFER PERMITTING
Revised 20180124

-q,0
\j I+ TA
V{RONMENTAL
December 2, 2021
US Army Corps of Engineers NC Division of Water Resources
Asheville Regulatory Field Office 401 and Buffer Permitting Unit
Attn: Mrs. Ms. Krysta Stygar Attn: Mr. Paul Wojoski
8430 University Executive Park Drive, Suite 611 1617 Mail Service Center
Charlotte, North Carolina 28262 Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
Re: Shepherd's Farm (Belk Residential) - +/- 221.54 acres
120 Belk Road Mooresville, NC 28115
Nationwide Permit 29 Application
Action ID SAW 2021-00263 / DWR Project #: 20210265
Krysta/Paul:
The applicant, Mr. George Harvey with Caballero Holdings, LLC, is requesting approval of the
enclosed Nationwide Permit 29 verification for unavoidable impacts to Waters of the United
States. Atlas Environmental completed a stream and wetland delineation on November 6, 2020
and was issued a preliminary jurisdictional determination for Mr. George Harvey on April 2,
2021. The existing preliminary jurisdictional determination is included in this package along
with correspondence with the North Carolina Historic Preservation Office and the United States
Fish and Wildlife Service Office.
There are seven streams, eight wetlands, and one jurisdictional pond on site. CH 100 (3,429
linear feet), CH 200 (3,678 linear feet), CH 200 A (31 linear feet), CH 300 (856 linear feet), CH
400 (2,855 linear feet), CH 500 (1,141 linear feet) and CH 600 (362 linear feet) for a total of
12,352 linear feet. CH 100, CH 2O0, CH 400, CH 500, and CH 600 are perennial. CH 200 A and
CH 300 are intermittent. WL 1000 (0.011 acre) is hydrologically connected to CH 100. WL
2000 (0.026 acre), WL 2100 (0.002 acre), WL 2200 (0.041 acre), WL 2300 (0.014 acre), and
WL 2400 (0.739 acre) are hydrologically connected to CH 2O0. WL 3000 (0.001 acre) is
hydrologically connected to CH 300. WL 5000 (0.005 acre) is hydrologically connected to CH
500. Stream impacts are proposed to less than 3% of the streams on site. Wetland impacts
are proposed to less than 12% of the wetlands on site. The road impacts at streams are
necessary to gain access through the property. One wetland impact is necessary for road and
sewer construction. The second wetland impact is necessary for grading of the amenity
clubhouse site.
The development will require five permanent stream crossings for road access and two
permanent wetland impacts for a sewer line installation and amenity area. Additional impacts
are being avoided by site design and the construction of retaining walls. Permanent stream
impacts are defined as impacts S1, S2, S3, S4, and S5 which are located on perennial streams
identified as CH 100, CH 2O0, and CH 400. Impact S1 and S2 are located on CH 100. S1 will
have no stream impact as a bottomless culvert is proposed. Impact S2 is approximately 113
ATLAS Environmental, Inc.
338 S. Sharon Amity Road, #411
Charlotte, North Carolina 28211
704-512-1206 (o) / 828-712-9205 (m)
www.atlasenvi.com / Offices in Asheville and Charlotte

o
VIRONMENTAL
linear feet. Impact S3 is approximately 111 linear feet located on CH 2O0. Impact S4 will have
no stream impact as a bottomless culvert is proposed. Impact S5 is approximately 102 linear
feet located on CH 400. Total impacts to streams are approximately 326 linear feet. Corps and
NC DWR stream mitigation will be required since stream impacts exceed 0.02 acre and 300
linear feet. A copy of the NC DMS acceptance letter is enclosed. S1-S5 are necessary for five
permanent road crossings. Two unavoidable wetland impacts are located at W1 and W2. W1
includes 0.023 acre of fill for road construction and sewer line installation. W2 includes 0.068
acre for the construction of the amenity area. Total wetland impacts are 0.091 acre. No
wetland mitigation is required since impacts are less than 0.10 acre.
Atlas Environmental is proposing mitigation through payment to NC Division of Mitigation
Services. The streams on site to be impacted rate as follows on NC SAM: S2 = medium, S3 =
high, and S5 = high. The SAM stream ratings are mostly due to the fact that all streams are
forested. Due to the medium and high SAM quality of the streams a 2:1 mitigation ratio is
proposed for impacts.
Enclosed are the necessary jurisdictional determination documents and additional information.
Thank you for your attention to the enclosed request. Please contact me if you need any
additional information.
Best regards,
Jennifer L Robertson, President
[e-mail]
ATLAS Environmental, Inc.
338 S. Sharon Amity Road, #411
Charlotte, North Carolina 28211
704-512-1206 (o) / 828-712-9205 (m)
www.atiasenvi.com / Offices in Asheville and Charlotte

O� -- \N A 7-f;9
4 G
(ILJIJJLX
Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.4 January 2009
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A. Applicant Information
1. Processing
1 a. Type(s) of approval sought from the
Corps:
®Section 404 Permit ❑Section 10 Permit
1 b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 29 or General Permit (GP) number:
1c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
❑ Yes
® No
1 d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
® 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization
1 e. Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWQ 401
Certification:
❑ Yes ® No
For the record only for Corps Permit:
❑ Yes ® No
1f. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for
mitigation of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank
or in -lieu fee program.
® Yes
❑ No
1 g. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h
below.
❑ Yes
® No
1h. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
❑ Yes
® No
2. Project Information
2a. Name of project:
Shepherd's Farm (Belk Residential)
2b. County:
Iredell
2c. Nearest municipality / town:
Mooresville
2d. Subdivision name:
Shepherd's Farm
2e. NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state
project no:
not a DOT project
3. Owner Information
3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed:
Mitchel B & Melanie P Belk, Susan N & Daphne G McCarter, Mitchell B Belk ETAL,
Thomas E Carriker, Jennier M Holt and Bradley S & Phyllis Belk
3b. Deed Book and Page No.
See Attached Parcel Reports, there are 11 project parcels
3c. Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable):
N/A
3d. Street address:
N/A
3e. City, state, zip:
N/A
3f. Telephone no.:
N/A
3g. Fax no.:
N/A
3h. Email address:
N/A
Page 1 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

4. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a. Applicant is:
❑ Agent ❑ Other, specify:
4b. Name:
Caballero Holdings, LLC
4c. Business name
(if applicable):
Mr. George Harvey
4d. Street address:
3840 Windermere Parkway, Suite 402
4e. City, state, zip:
Cumming, GA 30041
4f. Telephone no.:
unknown
4g. Fax no.:
unknown
4h. Email address:
[e-mail]
5. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a. Name:
Jennifer L Robertson
5b. Business name
(if applicable):
Atlas Environmental, Inc.
5c. Street address:
338 S. Sharon Amity Road #411
5d. City, state, zip:
Charlotte, NC 28211
5e. Telephone no.:
704-512-1206
5f. Fax no.:
no fax
5g. Email address:
[e-mail]
Page 2 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
1 a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID):
11 project parcels, see attached parcel reports
1 b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees):
[Latitude: 35.632213 Longitude: --80.826312
1 c. Property size:
—221.54 acres
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water to proposed project:
Cornelius Creek
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water:
WS-IV
2c. River basin:
Upper Catawba- 03050101
3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application: The ground surface is gently sloping to the West. The surrounding area consists predominantly of farmland
and with some residential developments to the Southeast. The land use of the review area is currently undeveloped and
forested land with two residences and a few structures.
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property: 0.839
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property: 12,352
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project: Residential development
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used: The project purpose is for the
construction of a residential development consisting of detached single family dwellings. The development will also
include the construction of stormwater treatment, parking, amenity areas, roadways, and associated infrastructure such
as electric, sewer, and water.
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
project (including all prior phases) in the past?
® Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
Comments:
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
of determination was made?
®Preliminary El Final
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known): A Baggarley, J Robertson, J Sinclair
Agency/Consultant Company: Atlas Environmental, Inc.
Other:
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
2021-00263
5. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
❑ Yes ® No ❑ Unknown
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
N/A
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project?
❑ Yes ® No
6b. If yes, explain.
N/A
Page 3 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1 a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
® Wetlands ® Streams - tributaries ❑ Buffers ❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a.
2b.
2c.
2d.
2e.
2f.
Wetland impact
Type of jurisdiction
Area of
number
Type of impact
Type of wetland
Forested
Corps (404, 10) or
impact
Permanent (P) or
(if known)
DWQ (401, other)
(acres)
Temporary T
W1 P
Fill
Seep
Yes
I Corps
0.023
W2 P
Fill
Seep
Yes
Corps
0.068
W3 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
-
W4 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
-
W5 - I
Choose one
I Choose one
Yes/No
-
W6 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
-
2g. Total wetland impacts:
0.091
2h. Comments:
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a.
3b.
3c.
3d.
3e.
3f.
3g.
Stream impact
Type of impact
Stream name
Perennial
Type of jurisdiction
Average
Impact
number -
(PER) or
(Corps - 404, 10
stream
length
Permanent (P) or
intermittent
DWQ — non-404,
width
(linear
Temporary (T)
(INT)?
other)
(feet)
feet)
S1 P
Other (Type In)
CH 100
PER
Corps
n/a
0
S2 P
Culvert
CH 100
PER
Corps
5.8
113/0.015
S3 P
Culvert
CH 200
PER
Corps
5.1
111/0.013
S4 P
Other (Type In)
CH 200
PER
Corps
n/a
none
S5 P
Culvert
CH 400
PER
Corps
7.3
102/0.017
S6 -
Choose one
-
-
326 linear
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts:
feet /
0.045
acre
3i. Comments: Impacts S1 and S4 (no impact) are permanent bottomless culvert installations for road crossings necessary for
property access.
Page 4 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individually list all open water impacts below.
4a.
Open water
impact number -
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
4b.
Name of waterbody
(if applicable)
4c.
Type of impact
4d.
Waterbody
type
4e.
Area of impact (acres)
01 -
Choose one
Choose
02 -
Choose one
Choose
03 -
Choose one
Choose
04 -
Choose one
Choose
4f. Total open water impacts:
4g. Comments:
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, then complete the chart below.
5a.
Pond ID
number
5b.
Proposed use or purpose
of pond
5c.
Wetland Impacts (acres)
5d.
Stream Impacts (feet)
5e.
Upland
(acres)
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
P1
I Choose one
P2
Choose one
5f. Total:
5g. Comments..
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a.Project is in which protected basin?
❑ Neuse El Tar -Pamlico ❑Catawba El Randleman ❑ Other:
6b.
Buffer impact
number-
Permanent (P) or
Temporary (T)
6c.
Reason for impact
6d.
Stream name
6e.
Buffer
mitigation
required?
6f.
Zone 1
impact
(square
feet)
6g.
Zone 2
impact
(square
feet
131 -
Yes/No
B2 -
Yes/No
B3 -
Yes/No
B4 -
Yes/No
B5 -
Yes/No
B6 -
Yes/No
6h. Total buffer impacts:
6i. Comments:
Page 5 of 10
PCN Form - Version 1.4 January 2009

D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1 a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
Impacts to aquatic resource have been minimized to the greatest extent possible. There is approximately 12,352 linear feet of
stream and 0.839 acre of wetlands. The development of the property, including approximately 443 single family dwellings on
227 acres, is being accomplished with only three road crossing stream impacts. The proposed impacts are to locations where
cattle have historically had access to the channels. In some areas the channel banks are vertical with no vegetative protection
and are actively eroding.
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
Construction and engineering techniques are being applied to further minimize impacts from the development to aquatic
resources. The stream crossings at S2, S3, and S5 are being shortened by headwalls at the upper and lower extents of the
culverts. 100' buffers will remain on all remaining streams.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
® Yes ❑ No
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
® DWQ ® Corps
2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
project?
❑ Mitigation bank
®Payment to in -lieu fee program
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank: none
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
Type: Choose one
Type: Choose one
Type: Choose one
Quantity none
Quantity none
Quantity none
3c. Comments: none
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached.
® Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested:
326 linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature:
Warm
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only):
none square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
none acres
4f. Non -riparian wetland mitigation requested:
none acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested:
none acres
4h. Comments: 2:1 ratio as streams are medium and high quality
based on forested condition per SAM
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
Page 6 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
❑ Yes ® No
buffer mitigation?
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
6c.
6d.
6e.
Zone
Reason for impact
Total impact
Multiplier
Required mitigation
(square feet)
(square feet)
Zone 1
none
none
3 (2 for Catawba)
none
Zone 2
none
none
1.5
none
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
none
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund).
not applicable
6h. Comments: no comments
Page 7 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1 a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
❑ Yes ® No
1 b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
❑ Yes ®No
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project?
>24% %
2b. Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan?
® Yes ❑ No
2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why:
2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
The project engineer is coordinating all of the stormwater requirements.
2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
Mooresville
3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a. In which local government's jurisdiction is this project?
Mooresville
3b. Which of the following locally -implemented stormwater management programs
apply (check all that apply):
® Phase II
❑ NSW
❑ USMP
® Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other:
3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
attached?
❑ Yes ® No
4. DWQ Stormwater Program Review
4a. Which of the following state -implemented stormwater management programs apply
(check all that apply):
❑ Coastal counties
❑ HQW
❑ ORW
❑ Session Law 2006-246
❑ Other:
4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
attached?
❑ Yes ® No
5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
® Yes ❑ No
5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
® Yes ❑ No
Page 8 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

F. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
la. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the
❑ Yes ® No
use of public (federal/state) land?
1 b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State
❑ Yes ❑ No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1 c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
❑ Yes ❑ No
letter.)
Comments: n/a
2. Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards,
❑ Yes ® No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b. Is this an after -the -fact permit application?
❑ Yes ® No
2c. If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
❑ Yes ® No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b. If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non -discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
The project will connect to existing sanitary sewer.
Page 9 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
❑ Yes ® No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
® Yes ❑ No
impacts?
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
-
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
IPAC and the NC natural hetitage program; FWS Asheville office coordination, see enclosed letter
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat?
❑ Yes ® No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
NOAA
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
❑ Yes ® No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
NC HPO Buffer Map, No comment letter attacehd from NC HPO
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain?
❑ Yes ® No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? FEMA floodmaps GIS layer
Jennifer L Robertson
f d"Ztxv
December 2,
2021
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name
fd"
Applicant/Agent's Signature
Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant
isprovided.)
Page 10 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

IRONMENTAL
AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District
Attn: Mr. Scott McLendon, Chief, Regulatory Division
PO Box 1890
Wilmington, North Carolina 28402-1890
-and-
NC Division of Water Resources, Water Quality Program
Wetlands, Buffers, Streams — Compliance and Permitting Unit
Attn: Mrs. Karen Higgins, Supervisor
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1650
I, the current landowner, lessee, contract holder to purchase, right to purchase holder, or easement
holder of the property/properties identified below, hereby authorize Atlas Environmental Inc to act on my
behalf as my agent during the processing of permits to impact Wetlands and Waters of the US that are
regulated by the Clean Water Act and the Rivers and Harbors Act. Federal and State agents are
authorized to be on said property when accompanied by Atlas Environmental Inc staff for the purpose of
conducting on -site investigations and issuing a determination associated with Waters of the US subject to
Federal jurisdiction under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors
Act of 1899 and Waters of the State including 404 Wetlands, Isolated Wetlands, and other non-404
Wetlands subject to a permitting program administered by the State of North Carolina. Atlas
Environmental Inc is authorized to provide supplemental information needed for delineation approval
and/or permit processing at the request of the Corps or NC DWR Water Quality Program.
Belk Residential
Project Name:
Multiple, See Parcel Reports
Property Owner of Record:
Caballero Holdings, LLC / Gee Harvey
Contact Name:
3840 Windermere Parkway, Suite 402
Address:
Cumming, GA 30041
Address:
unknown
Phone/Fax Number:
[e-mail]
Email Address:
120 Belk Road
Project Address:
ooresville, NC 28115
Project Address:
°Ik esidential
Tax PIN:
Signature:
rFi/�L=M
ATLAS Environmental Inc.
338 S. Sharon Amity Road, #411
Charlotte, North Carolina 28211
704-512-1206 (o) / 828-712-9205 (m)
[e-mail]
www.e.tlasenvi.com

ON
Legend
= Review Area
D Iredell Co. Parcels
2 Ft Contours
Streets
Delineation
Intermittent
= Perennial
Pond
Wetland
= Culvert
1 of 7
l Aquatic Resource Sketch Ma i Sketch Map provided for illustrative purposes and
o°
� �\ \_. /� preliminary planning only. Not intended to be relied upon
for exact location, dimension, or orientation. All findings
and assessments are subject to verification from the
Army Corps of Engineers, NC Division of Water
Resources and/or other appropriate local authorities.
Do not reproduce map set except in its entirety.
U
Project Name: Belk Residential
Location: 120 Belk Road Mooresville, NC 28115
For: Caballero Holdings, LLC Attn: Mr. George Harvey
Coordinates: 35.63013,-80.83370
0 300 600 900 1200 Ft
Date: November 16, 2020 Updated April 01, 2021

Paae2of7
Project Name: Belk Residential
Location: 120 Belk Road Mooresville, NC 28115
For: Caballero Holdings, LLC Attn: Mr. George Harvey
Coordinates: 35.63013,-80.83370
Date: November 16, 2020 Updated April 01, 2021

Potential Non Wetland
CH 100, - 3429 LF
Legend
O Review Area
OIredell Co. Parcels
2 Ft Contours
Streets
Delineation
Intermittent
= Perennial
Pond
Wetland
= Culvert
��1�� F
A.fr6`
3 of 7
uatic Resource
17
Potential Non Wetland
CH 400, - 2855 LF
Project Name: Belk Residential
7
Potential Non Wetland
CH 2O0, - 3678 LF
0
0 100 200 300 400 Ft
Location: 120 Belk Road Mooresville, NC 28115 1
For: Caballero Holdings, LLC Attn: Mr. George Harvey
Detail 1 Coordinates: 35.63013,-80.83370 Date: November 16, 2020 Updated April 01, 2021

Legend
O Review Area
OIredell Co. Parcels
--- - 2 Ft Contours
Streets
Delineation
Intermittent
= Perennial
Pond
Wetland
= Culvert
rl-"A ;
WW6- -
uatic Resource
CH 100 Continued
Existing culvert for field access
-40LF
Potential Wetland
WL 1000, - 0.011 Ac
Project Name: Belk Residential
7
0 100 200 300 400 Ft
Location: 120 Belk Road Mooresville, NC 28115 1
For: Caballero Holdings, LLC Attn: Mr. George Harvey
Paae4of7
Detail 2 Coordinates: 35.63013,-80.83370 Date: November 16, 2020 Updated April 01, 2021

uatic Resource Sketch Ma D
J Potential Wetland
// WL 2200, - 0.041 Ac
/ Potential Wetland
WL 2100, - 0.002 Ac
1 � /
%
Potential Wetland
WL 2000, - 0.026 Ac
xrl
Legend
CH 200 Continued
O Review Area
O Iredel I Co. Parcels
2 Ft Contours
Streets
Delineation
Intermittent / Z/ i= Perennial
Pond
Wetland i ;;% ;; / \I /\ '; i' % ! % 0 100 200 300 400 Ft
= Culvert %%�!% ;` %% ,/,'/ %� i i / ; , ��� // /
Project Name: Belk Residential
% C Location: 120 Belk Road Mooresville, NC 28115
ONMFNTAL For: Caballero Holdings, LLC Attn: Mr. George Harvey
Paae 5 of 7 Detail 3 Coordinates: 35.63013,-80.83370 Date: November 16, 2020 Updated April 01, 2021

Ma
Potential Non Wetland
CH 300, - 856 LF
IPotential Non Wetland
Pond 1, - 0.164 Ac
Potential Wetland
WL 3000, - 0.001 Ac
Legend
-'%'
O Review Area
OIredell Co. Parcels
— 2 R Contours
o Streets
Delineation
Intermittent
PerennialPond
s f
Wetland
= Culvert
e6of7
Potential Non Wetland
CH 200 A, - 158 LF Ac
Project Name: Belk Residential
Potential Wetland
W L 2400, - 0.739 Ac
0 100 200 300 400 Ft
Location: 120 Belk Road Mooresville, NC 28115 1
For: Caballero Holdings, LLC Attn: Mr. George Harvey
Detail 4 Coordinates: 35.63013,-80.83370 Date: November 16, 2020 Updated April 01, 2021

uatic Resource_ Sketch Ma
_ ".-., Potential Non Wetland �..------
_ CH 400, 2855 LF Continued
Legend
O Review Area
OIredell Co. Parcels
2 Ft Contours
Streets
Delineation
Intermittent
M Perennial
20 Pond
= Wetland
= Culvert
Potential Wetland
WL 5000, - 0.005 Ac
Potential Non Wetland
CH 500, - 1141 LF
Potential Non Wetland
CH 600, - 362 LF
Project Name: Belk Residential
0
0 100 200 300 400 Ft
Location: 120 Belk Road Mooresville, NC 28115 1
For: Caballero Holdings, LLC Attn: Mr. George Harvey
Paqe 7 of 7 Detail 5 1 Coordinates: 35.63013,-80.83370 Date: November 16, 2020 Updated April 01, 2021

Stream Impact (Permanent)
W
Stream CH 100(Perennial)
S2= 113', 0.015 acre
)
Road Crossing72" culvert)
�` 'r� , I , I / / / I
`�� _ /./Y )\,' ' l I ' / i / ;
/ /
/ / .: / I
Stream Impact No Impact)
P ( P )
K
SAM = Medium(
- ( r'
!-
/ I ,
Stream CH 200 (Perennial)
, /
;
SITE
lu
"
S4 = 0', 0 acre
\
]
U
Road Crossing (Bottomless Culvert)
\
#
J z r a
SAM = Medium
Vicinity MaP
NTS
2 Ve
CnWetland
Impact (Permanent)
Wetland WL2000
?>
_
> '/ �^ ;�' L ` `, - — _ _ _t '
)
F
w a
W t = 0.023 acre
Sewer Line Installation /t • ;' 1
�: ' / �y"�— _
r
� JJ r / f'�, ;',., it
\ , /
, / /: ': .wi .. "F!. .•.' P� — /i—_—'_—
'
„.. ,
fir% ,/ -.'It � �',• ' •' `�1
`I`
1 I � `
% :. � �jl: Jet'...... .,•.�u+xa
—
1 1 /n � 1
f\
Nw
, , ;, �• ,• �, �
Wetland Impact (Permanent)
, 1"5
Welland WL 2400
0.068 acre
'•
'
Amenity Area Grading
•r• ,
� /,
Stream Impact Permanent
/
Stream CH 200 (Perennial)
-___
'� / / / I
L
S3=111',0.013acre
\ .' ll 1
cu a no
r :.' .j •: �wc' ,. �/ i —
_ — j,
Road Crossing (60" culvert)
, (
, ! i I
LL = M
. ! i .i•; f ' , -
-� -" �- -''/. ��_
SAM = High
1
o,
1�_ I
U E
1 .�... .........•�. • l \ i
/ SITE INFORMATION
`—' `� \
/ � ` 1``'
'O C
Q�
'�\ 1 •^� "tl
//
x,"c] •accas ixc,uoEo ix rHe oEvaw.exruaE
"mot•.65930]W3�,95M99]T9,.699995919. K50699334.699N59B],
( ' \
0
� O
." J �,
'\\ -^ �- ,���"'^ / •�� -
_� .699]M193 59]92999,.999)O1099, 4699903469.4599]3]90.
In
Stream Impact
Impact)
/'��z
�•,� ' \�`\ ` '
(No
StreEVELOPER
am CH 100 (Perennial)
-
_,
1"I
\ `\ , 1 `I °—w»,o�`9� 6,—.
I /, / IJJ
St = 0'• 0 acre
.-- v - -' --
\ :9�]Ew.
\ . \ `\
I III I
Road Crossing (Bottomless Culvert)
! SAM = High
•�
/'
G DESINER: `• 'f,
III A
,. 9 �.IE
,
j
Stream Impact(Permanen')
`
Stream CH 400 (Perennial)
S5 = 102', 0.017 acre
`�` � \
\ � (
`�\
, � \`� `,I � „_ � FLOOD DATA
,
lit 11�1i1 ( axe" ]
Road Crossing (60" culvert)
=
�` / i
J
, ) 'Jill
i r`!/%i«f I i / IMPERVIOUS
SAM = High (/
) I
} ,I'
``I
GRAPHIC SCALE
I •%Y;b �
�I /II`,n ` uT
�_.. ' \ 1\ l\� �\�,1 / )
�
SI'RPAM CULERIS�
` 1i
'.
\� \ ` 1 ��/'/ / "' I(
xomc.]n ,o n.
s rw.

rod ih
i
str-�c�-
EastLake
Shepherd's Farm
Engineering, PLLC
Mooresville, NC
47o North Broad St.
Caballero Holdings, LLC
Cumming GA
MOORESVILLE, NC 28115
[phone]
PROJECT #: 20-11 DATE: 11/17/21 R2
TITLE
SHEET
NC License #: P-1713
DRAWN BY: pdc CHECKED BY: pdc
STREAM IMPACT #1
1 OF 1

�
11 Ili
_
'•
-
IA� �;p
fill fil
� • � I'I
.,
�.. a ,�
o' ���.►:►,1
e cola
..
1 ry
`?.`, a.
�I i1,r' 1r
Engineering, PLLC
Mooresville,
47o North Broad St.
Caballero Holdings, LLC
Cumming GA
..• NC 28115
:. :.
R. DATE:

ME 90
..e�.✓s•�r. � ��� ` IOC..
WIN011
p!°�e•0 ii � i r/-
�ii
r —
•
Shepherd's Farm
Engineering,Mooresville,
47o North Broad St.
Caballero..
ings, LLC
MOORESVILLE, NC 28115 Cumming GA
:• .PROJECT

11/1612020
Property Data
Iredell County
Property Data
Parcel Number: 4659705087.000
Inquiry Date: 11/16/2020
Disclaimer: While every effort is made to keep information provided over the internet accurate and up-to-date, the County does not certify
the authenticity or accuracy of such information. No warranties, express or implied, are provided for the records and/or mapping data
herein, or for their use or interpretation by the User.
Property Map
C'
CP
120
k
Owner/Property Info
Tax Account Number: Null
Old Parcel Number: Null
Owner Name: BELK MITCHELL B+MELANIE P
Mailing Address: Null Null Null Null
Property Location: Null Null
Lot Number:
Legal Description: BRAWLEY U521
Municipal Information
Township Code: 03
City Code: Null
Neighborhood Code: 03010
Value Information - Current Year Property Record Card (PRC)
Building Value: Null
Other Building Features: Null
Land Value: Null
Tax Assessed Value: Null
Deferred: Null
Land Information - Register_of Deeds Online Search
,b3.mobile3ll.com/iredellReport/report.aspx?PIN=4659705087.000
1830
l01
422
10

11/16/2020
Date Recorded
20120209
Tax Information
Exemption
Null
Property Data
Document Type Deed Book Deed Page Plat Book & Page
WD 2158 1850
Tax Code 1 Tax Code 2 Tax Code 3
Null Null Null
Current Zoning Contact Info.
Land Area Land Type Zoning
Null Null Null
Tax Code 4 Tax Code 5
Null Null
Iredell County
704.878.3118
Harmony
704.878,3118
Love Valley
704.878.3118
City of Statesville
704.878.3575
Town of Troutman
704.528.7600
Town of Mooresville
704.662.7040
Village of Davidson
704.892.7591
web3.mobile311.com/IredellReport/report.aspx?PIN=4659705087.000 2/2

fi arAP411 11
Property Data
Iredell County
Property Data
Parcel Number: 4659704103.000
Inquiry Date: 11/16/2020
Disclaimer: While every effort is made to keep information provided over the internet accurate and up-to-date, the County does not certify
the authenticity or accuracy of such information. No warranties, express or implied, are provided for the records and/or mapping data
herein, or for their use or interpretation by the User.
Property Map
Z
c3'
Owner/Property Info
Tax Account Number: 77428633
Old Parcel Number: 0301000000B016A
Owner Name: BELK MITCHELL B+MELANIE P
Mailing Address: 120 BELK RD MOORESVILLE NC 28115
Property Location: CHARLOTTE HWY Null
Lot Number:
Legal Description: BELK US21
Municipal Information
Township Code: 03
City Code: 00
Neighborhood Code: 03010
Value Information - Current Year Property Record Card (PRC)
Building Value: 0
Other Building Features: 0
Land Value: 2990
Tax Assessed Value: 2990
Deferred: 0
Land Information - Register of Deeds, Online Search
b3.mobile311.com/IredelIReporUreport.aspx?PIN=4659704103.000 1/2

11/16/2020
Date Recorded
20190726
Tax Information
Exemption
Null
Property Data
Document Type Deed Book Deed Page Plat Book & Page
WD 2633 2041
Tax Code 1 Tax Code 2 Tax Code 3
C ADVLTAX Null FR06ADVLTAX
Current Zoning Contact Info.
Land Area Land Type Zoning
0.168 AC RA
Tax Code 4 Tax Code 5
Null Null
Iredell County
704.878.3118
Harmony
704.878.3118
Love Valley
704.878.3118
City of Statesville
704.878.3575
Town of Troutman
704.528.7600
Town of Mooresville
704.662.7040
Village of Davidson
704.892.7591
web3.mobile311.com/IredellReport/report.aspx?PIN=4659704103.000 2/2

11/16/2020
Property Data
Iredell County
Property Data
Parcel Number: 4658792995.000
Inquiry Date: 11/16/2020
Disclaimer: While every effort is made to keep information provided over the internet accurate and up-to-date, the County does not certify
the authenticity or accuracy of such information. No warranties, express or implied, are provided for the records and/or mapping data
herein, or for their use or interpretation by the User.
Property Map
Owner/Property Info
Tax Account Number: 77428633
Old Parcel Number:
Owner Name: BELK MITCHELL B+MELANIE P
Mailing Address: 120 BELK RD MOORESVILLE NC 28115
Property Location: BELK RD
Lot Number:
Legal Description: OFF CHARLOTTE HWY
Municipal Information
Township Code: 03
City Code: Null
Neighborhood Code: 03010
Value Information - Current Year Property Record Card (PRC)
Building Value: 0
Other Building Features: 0
Land Value: 19600
Tax Assessed Value: moo
Deferred: 0
Land Information - Register of Deeds Online -Search
web3.mobile3ll.com/Iredel[Reportfreport.aspx?PIN=4658792995.000
1/2

fii/ld KO-T!,
Date Recorded
20031031
Tax Information
Exemption
Null
Property Data
Document Type Deed Book Deed Page Plat Book & Page
W D 1499 43
Tax Code 1 Tax Code 2 Tax Code 3
C ADVLTAX Null FR06ADVLTAX
Current Zoning Contact Info.
Land Area Land Type Zoning
0.55 AC R2
Tax Code 4 Tax Code 5
Null Null
Iredell County
704.878.3118
Harmony
704.878.3118
Love Valley
704.878.3118
City of Statesville
704.878.3575
Town of Troutman
704.528.7600
Town of Mooresville
704.662.7040
Village of Davidson
704.892.7591
web3.mobile311.com/IredellReporttreport.aspx?PIN=4658792995.000 2/2

11/16/2020
Property Data
Iredell County
Property Data
Parcel Number: 4659702086.000
Inquiry Date: 11/16/2020
Disclaimer: While every effort is made to keep information provided over the intemet accurate and up-to-date, the County does not certify
the authenticity or accuracy of such information. No warranties, express or implied, are provided for the records and/or mapping data
herein, or for their use or interpretation by the User.
Property Map
Owner/Property Info
Tax Account Number: 77428633
Old Parcel Number: 0301000OOOB066
Owner Name: BELK MITCHELL B+MELANIE P
Mailing Address: 120 BELK RD MOORESVILLE NC 28115
Property Location: BELK RD
Lot Number:
Legal Description: u S 21 OFF BELK
Municipal Information
Township Code: 03
City Code: Null
Neighborhood Code:03010
Value Information - Current YgALPrgperty Record Card (PRC)
Building Value: 156290
Other Building Features: 0
Land Value: 35570
Tax Assessed Value: 191860
Deferred: 0
Land Information - Register of Deeds Online Search
web3.mobile3ll.com/fredellReporttreport.aspx?PIN=4659702086.000
1 /2

11/16/2020
Date Recorded
20031031
Tax Information
Exemption
Null
Property Data
Document Type Deed Book Deed Page Plat Book & Page
W D 1499 43
Tax Code 1 Tax Code 2 Tax Code 3
C ADVLTAX Null FR06ADVLTAX
Current Zoning Contact Info.
Land Area Land Type Zoning
1.4 AC R2
Tax Code 4 Tax Code 5
Null Null
Iredell County
704.878.3118
Harmony
704.878.3118
Love Valley
704.878.3118
City of Statesville
704.878.3575
Town of Troutman
704.528.7600
Town of Mooresville
704.662.7040
Village of Davidson
704.892.7591
web3.mobile311.com/IredellReport/report.aspx?PIN=4659702086.000 2/2

11 /16/2020
Property Data
wf
Iredell County
Property Data
Parcel Number: 4658495222.000
Inquiry Date: 11/16/2020
Disclaimer: While every effort is made to keep information provided over the internet accurate and up-to-date, the County does not certify
the authenticity or accuracy of such information. No warranties, express or implied, are provided for the records and/or mapping data
herein, or for their use or interpretation by the User.
Property Map
21
it
� F' be�.,�.--�••-
1 _~ ;4
t-
� •
• 4
�'y.Y�".„,r
�!F I -- - - -- - - - - --
1
f
-T
I
---- r -
--------------------
--------------
•
�•• •J •� •_�:•'�r''•
I------_-__
Owner/Property Info
Tax Account Number: Null
Old Parcel Number: Null
Owner Name: MCCARTER SUSAN N+DAPHNE G NEEL
Mailing Address: Null Null Null Null
Property Location: Null Null
Lot Number: Null
Legal Description: NEEL BELK U521 60 ROW2734-1350
Municipal Information
Township Code: 03
City Code: Null
Neighborhood Code: 03010
Value Information - Current Year Property Record Card (PRC)
Building Value: Null
Other Building Features: Null
Land Value: Null
Tax Assessed Value: Null
Deferred: Null
Land Information - Register of Deeds Online Search
:b3.mobile311.com/IredellReport/report.aspx?PIN=4658495222.000
1/2

11/16/2020
Date Recorded
20160307
Tax Information
Exemption
Null
Property Data
Document Type Deed Book Deed Page Plat Book & Page
WD 2407 1241
Tax Code 1 Tax Code 2 Tax Code 3
Null Null Null
Current Zoning Contact Info.
Land Area Land Type Zoning
Null Null Null
Tax Code 4 Tax Code 5
Null Null
Iredell County
704.878.3118
Harmony
704.878.3118
Love Valley
704.878.3118
City of Statesville
704.878.3575
Town of Troutman
704.528.7600
Town of Mooresville
704.662.7040
Village of Davidson
704.892.7591
web3.mobile311.com/IredellReport/report.aspx?PIN=4658495222.000 2/2

11 /16/2020
Property Data
redell County
Property Data
Parcel Number: 4659407004,000
Inquiry Date: 11/16/2020
Disclaimer: While every effort is made to keep information provided over the internet accurate and up-to-date, the County does not certify
the authenticity or accuracy of such information. No warranties, express or implied, are provided for the records and/or mapping data
herein, or for their use or interpretation by the User.
OwneriProperty Info
Tax Account Number: 80031796
Old Parcel Number: 0301000OOOB016B
Owner Name: BELK MITCHELL B ETAL
Mailing Address: 1830 CHARLOTTE HWY MOORESVILLE NC 28115
Property Location: CHARLOTTE HWY Null
Lot Number: Null
Legal Description: BELK FARM US21 OFF
Municipal Information
Township Code: 03
City Code: 00
Neighborhood Code: 03010
Value Information - Current Year Property Record Card (PRC).
Building Value: 0
Other Building Features: 0
Land Value: 224320
Tax Assessed Value: 224320
Deferred: o
Land Information - Register of Deeds Online Search
ib3.mobile311.com/lredelIReport/report.aspx?PI N=4659407004.000
1/2

11 /16/2020
Date Recorded
20150814
Tax Information
Exemption
Null
Property Data
Document Type Deed Book Deed Page Plat Book & Page
WB 15E 984
Tax Code 1 Tax Code 2 Tax Code 3
C ADVLTAX Null FR06ADVLTAX
Current Zoning Contact Info.
Land Area Land Type Zoning
72.83 AC R2
Tax Code 4 Tax Code 5
Null Null
Iredell County
704.878.3118
Harmony
704.878.3118
Love Valley
704.878.3118
City of Statesville
704.878.3575
Town of Troutman
704.528.7600
Town of Mooresville
704.662.7040
Village of Davidson
704.892.7591
web3.mobile311.com/IredellReport/report.aspx?PIN=4659407004.000 2/2

11/16/2020 Property Data
Iredell County
Property Data
Parcel Number: 4659503669.000
Inquiry Date: 11/16/2020
Disclaimer: While every effort is made to keep information provided over the internet accurate and up-to-date, the County does not certify
the authenticity or accuracy of such information. No warranties, express or implied, are provided for the records and/or mapping data
herein, or for their use or interpretation by the User.
Owner/ Property Info
Tax Account Number: 80032980
Old Parcel Number: Null
Owner Name: MCCARTER SUSAN N+DAPHNE G NEEL
Mailing Address: 312 WOOD DUCK LP MOORESVILLE NC 28117
Property Location: MILO LN
Lot Number:
Legal Description: US21 PB29-42
Municipal Information
Township Code: 03
City Code: Null
Neighborhood Code: 03010
Value Information - Current Year Properly Record Card (PRC)
Building Value: 0
Other Building Features: 0
Land Value: 2300
Tax Assessed Value: 2300
Deferred: 0
Land Information - Register -of -Deeds Online Search
web3. mobile311.com/I red ell Report/report.aspx?PIN=4659503669.000
1/2

11/16/2020
Date Recorded
20160307
Tax Information
Exemption
Null
Property Data
Document Type Deed Book Deed Page Plat Book & Page
WD 2407 1237
Tax Code 1 Tax Code 2 Tax Code 3
C ADVLTAX Null FR06ADVLTAX
Current Zoning Contact Info.
Land Area Land Type Zoning
0.14 AC RA
Tax Code 4 Tax Code 5
Null Null
Iredell County
704.878.3118
Harmony
704.878.3118
Love Valley
704.878.3118
City of Statesville
704.878.3575
Town of Troutman
704.528.7600
Town of Mooresville
704.662.7040
Village of Davidson
704.892.7591
web3.mobile311.com/IredellReport/report.aspx?PIN=4659503669.000 2/2

11 /16/2020
Property Data
Iredell County
Property Data
Parcel Number: 4658585819.000
Inquiry Date: 11/16/2020
Disclaimer: While every effort is made to keep information provided over the internet accurate and up-to-date, the County does not certify
the authenticity or accuracy of such information. No warranties, express or implied, are provided for the records and/or mapping data
herein, or for their use or interpretation by the User.
Property Map
„
I,
11
,1
1 I II -y
11 - - - - - -- l--
-------
..11 - ----
1-------------
2.9 I
• 1
I
1
1 -
j
I
265 I t
------------------
t
129i, +' '1'1` •r,..rj F.111:h
! • • ! •� • 1132`.
104
12
Owner/ Property Infer
Tax Account Number: 80050511
Old Parcel Number: 0301000o00B016D
Owner Name: CARRIKER THOMAS E III ETAL
Mailing Address: 145 SHINNVILLE RD MOORESVILLE NC 28115
Property Location: CHARLOTTE HWY Null
Lot Number: Null
Legal Description: CARRIKER OFF US HWY 21
Municipal Information
Township Code: 03
City Code: 00
Neighborhood Code: 03010
Value Information - Current Year Property Record Card_(PRC)
Building Value: 0
Other Building Features: 0
Land Value: 191370
Tax Assessed Value: 191370
Deferred: 174300
Land Information - Register of Deeds Online Search
web3.mobile3ll.com/Irede]]Report/report.aspx?PIN=4658585819.000
1 /2

11/16/2020
Date Recorded
20171229
Tax Information
Exemption
Null
Property Data
Document Type Deed Book Deed Page Plat Book & Page
WD 2531 2313 Null
Tax Code 1 Tax Code 2 Tax Code 3
C ADVLTAX Null FR06ADVLTAX
Current Zoning Contact Info.
Land Area Land Type Zoning
45.781 AC R2
Tax Code 4 Tax Code 5
Null Null
Iredell County
704.878.3118
Harmony
704.878.3118
Love Valley
704.878.3118
City of Statesville
704.878.3575
Town of Troutman
704.528.7600
Town of Mooresville
704.662.7040
Village of Davidson
704.892.7591
web3.mobile311.com/IredellReporUreport.aspx?PIN=4658585819.000 2/2

11/16/2020
Property Data
wt
Iredell County
Property Data
Parcel Number: 4658573750.000
Inquiry Date: 11/16/2020
Disclaimer: While every effort is made to keep information provided over the internet accurate and up-to-date, the County does not certify
the authenticity or accuracy of such information. No warranties, express or implied, are provided for the records and/or mapping data
herein, or for their use or interpretation by the User.
i
r
:1
r e,ttl Finch In
��5a
------ •---
I
122 J
164
r- - - - -238- 232 226` 220 214 I I 201 z02. t 188 • ' I .`
-Bailey Ro - -
Cxi - 144 j
r I'
Owner/Property Info
Tax Account Number: 80021326
Old Parcel Number: 0301000OOOB046
Owner Name: HOLT JENNIFER M
Mailing Address: 108 MILLS PLANTATION CIR TROUTMAN NC 28166
Property Location: CHARLOTTE HWY
Lot Number:
Legal Description: OVERCASH US21
Municipal Information
Township Code: 03
City Code: oo
Neighborhood Code: 03010
Value Information - Current Year Property Record Card (PRC).
Building Value: 0
Other Building Features: 0
Land Value: 325510
Tax Assessed Value: 325510
Deferred: 0
Land Information - Register of Deeds Online Search
�b3.mobile311.com/lredellReport/report.aspx?P I N=4658573750.000
irX

11/16/2020
Date Recorded
20150120
Tax Information
Exemption
Null
Property Data
Document Type Deed Book Deed Page Plat Book & Page
WD 2337 26
Tax Code 1 Tax Code 2 Tax Code 3
C ADVLTAX Null FR06ADVLTAX
Current Zoning Contact Info.
Land Area Land Type Zoning
41.678 AC RA
Tax Code 4 Tax Code 5
Null Null
Iredell County
704.878.3118
Harmony
704.878.3118
Love Valley
704.878.3118
City of Statesville
704.878.3575
Town of Troutman
704.528.7600
Town of Mooresville
704.662.7040
Village of Davidson
704.892.7591
web3.mobile311.com/iredellReport/report.aspx?PIN=4658573750.000 2/2

11/16/2020
Property Data
WI
Iredell County
Property Data
Parcel Number: 4658468604.000
Inquiry Date: 11/16/2020
Disclaimer: While every effort is made to keep information provided over the internet accurate and up-to-date, the County does not certify
the authenticity or accuracy of such information. No warranties, express or implied, are provided for the records and/or mapping data
herein, or for their use or interpretation by the User.
Property Map
125 125
I
Owner/Props Info
Tax Account Number: 80002908
Old Parcel Number: 030IM0000OA020
Owner Name: MEADOWS JENNIFER 0
Mailing Address: 108 MILLS PLANTATION CIR TROUTMAN NC 28166
Property Location: BAILEY RD
Lot Number:
Legal Description: NC150 OFF
Municipal Information
Township Code: 03
City Code: Null
Neighborhood Code: 03010
Value Information - Current Year Property Record Card (PRC)
Building Value: 0
Other Building Features: 4940
Land Value: 9020
Tax Assessed Value: 13960
Deferred: 0
Land Information - Register_of Deeds Online Search
:b3.mobile3ll.com/IredellReport/report.aspx?PIN=4658468604.000
146
93
L 100
irg

11 /16/2020
Date Recorded
20120318
Tax Information
Exemption
Null
Property Data
Document Type Deed Book Deed Page Plat Book & Page
WB 12E 310
Tax Code 1 Tax Code 2 Tax Code 3
C ADVLTAX Null FR06ADVLTAX
Current Zoning Contact Info.
Land Area Land Type Zoning
0.82 AC RA
Tax Code 4 Tax Code 5
Null Null
Iredell County
704.878.3118
Harmony
704.878.3118
Love Valley
704.878.3118
City of Statesville
704.878.3575
Town of Troutman
704.528.7600
Town of Mooresville
704.662.7040
Village of Davidson
704.892.7591
web3.mobile311.com/IredellReport/report.aspx?PIN=4658468604.000 2/2

11 /16/2020
Property Data
wl
Iredell County
Property Data
Parcel Number: 4659705175.000
Inquiry Date: 11/16/2020
Disclaimer: While every effort is made to keep information provided over the internet accurate and up-to-date, the County does not certify
the authenticity or accuracy of such information. No warranties, express or implied, are provided for the records and/or mapping data
herein, or for their use or interpretation by the User.
Property Map
j0
C,L
OIL
Owner/ Property Info
Tax Account Number: Null
Old Parcel Number: Null
Owner Name: BELK BRADLEY S+PHYLLIS C
Mailing Address: Null Null Null Null
Property Location: Null Null
Lot Number:
Legal Description: BELK US21
Municipal Information
Township Code: 03
City Code: Null
Neighborhood Code: 03010
Value Information - Current Year Property Record Card (PRC).
Building Value: Null
Other Building Features: Null
Land Value: Null
Tax Assessed Value: Null
Deferred: Null
Land Information - Register of Deeds Online Search
:b3.mobile311.com/IredellReporUreport.aspx?PIN=4659705175.000
CP
1830
1 /2

11 /16/2020
Date Recorded
20190726
Tax Information
Exemption
Null
Property Data
Document Type Deed Book Deed Page Plat Book & Page Land Area Land Type Zoning
WD 2633 2037 Null Null Null
Tax Code 1 Tax Code 2 Tax Code 3 Tax Code 4 Tax Code 5
Null Null Null Null Null
Current Zoning Contact Info.
Iredell County
704.878.3118
Harmony
704.878.3118
Love Valley
704.878.3118
City of Statesville
704.878.3575
Town of Troutman
704.528.7600
Town of Mooresville
704.662.7040
Village of Davidson
704.892.7591
web3.mobile311.com/IredellReport/report.aspx?PIN=4659705175.000 2/2

U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
WILNIINGTON DISTRICT
Action Id. SAW-2021-00263 County:Iredell U.S.G.S. Quad: NC -Shepherds
NOTIFICATION OF JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
Requestor: Caballero Holdings, LLC
Gee Harvey
Address: 3840 Windermere Parkway Suite 402
Cumming. GA 30041
E-mail: [e-mail]
Size (acres) 221.54 Nearest Town Mooresville
Nearest Waterway Cornelius Creek RiverBasin Santee
USGS HUC 03050101 Coordinates Latitude:35.63013
Longitude:-80.83370
Location description: Projectcontains multiple parcels near the location of 120 Belk Road. Mooresville, Iredell CountL.North
Carolina. PINfsI: 4659407004, 4658495222, 4658585819.4658573750.4659702086, 4658792995 4659705097, 4659705175.
4659704103
Indicate Which of the Followine Apply:
A. Preliminary Determination
® There appearto be waters onthe above described projectarea/property, thatmay be subjectto Section 404 ofthe Clean Water
Act (CWA)(33 USC § 1344) and/or Section 10 ofthe Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) (33 USC § 403). The waters have been
delineated, and the delineation has been verified by the Corps to be sufficiently accurate and reliable. The approximate boundaries
of these waters are shown on the enclosed delineation map dated 4/1/2021. Therefore this preliminaryjurisdiction determination
maybe used in the permit evaluation process, including determining compensatory mitigation. Forpurposes of computation of
impacts, compensatory mitigation requirements, and other resource protection measures, a permit decision made on the basis of a
preliminary JD will treat allwaters and wetlands thatwould be affected in any wayby the permitted activity on the site as if they
are jurisdictional waters of the U.S. This preliminary determination is not an appealable action under the Regulatory Program
Administrative Appeal Process (Reference 33 CFR Part 331). However, youmayrequest an approved JD, which is an appealable
action, by contacting the Corps district for further instruction.
❑ There appear to be waters on the above described project area/property, that maybe subject to Section 404 o fthe Clean Water
Act (CWA)(33 USC § 1344) and/or Section 10 ofthe Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) (33 USC § 403). However, since the waters
have not been properly delineated, this preliminaryjurisdiction determination may not be used in the permit evaluation process.
Without a verified wetland delineation, this preliminary determination is merely an effectivepresumptionof CWA/RHA
jurisdiction over all of the waters at the project area, which is not sufficiently accurate and reliable to support an enforceable
permit decision. We recommend thatyouhave the waters onyourproject area/property delineated As the Corps may not be able
to accomplish this wetland delineation in a timely manner, you maywish to obtain a consultantto conduct a delineation that can
be verified by the Corps.
B. Approved Determination
❑ There areNavigable Waters ofthe United States within the above descrrbedproject area/property subjectto the permit
requirements of Section 10 of the Rivers andHarbors Act (RHA) (33 USC § 403) and Section 404 ofthe Clean WaterAct
(CWA)(33 USC § 1344). Unless there is a change in law orourpublished regulations, this determination maybe relied upon for
a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
❑ There are waterson the above described project area/property subjectto thepermit requirements ofSection 404 ofthe Clean
WaterAct (CWA) (33 USC § 1344). Unless there is a changein the law or our publishedregulations, this determination maybe
relied upon fora periodnotto exceedfiveyears fromthe date ofthis notification.
❑ We recommend you have the waters on yourproject area/property delineated As the Corps maynotbe able to accomplish
this wetland delineation in a timely manner, you may wish to obtain a consultant to conduct a delineation that can be verified by
the Corps.
❑ The waters on yourproject area/property havebeen delineated and the delineation has beenverifiedby theCorps. The
approximate boundaries of these waters are shown on the enclosed delineation map datedDATE. We strongly suggest youhave
this delineation surveyed Upon completion, this survey should be reviewed and verified by the Corps. Once verified, this survey

SAW-2021-00263
will provide an accurate depiction of all areas subject to CWAjurisdictiononyourproperty which, providedthere is no change in
the law or ourpublished regulations, maybe relied upon for a period notto exceed five years.
❑ The waters have been delineatedand surveyed and are accurately depictedon theplat signed bythe Corps Regulatory Official
identified below onDATE. Unless there is a change in the law or ourpublished regulations, this determinationmay be relied
upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
❑ There are no waters of the U.S., to include wetlands, presenton the above describedproject area/propertywhichare subjectto the
permit requirements of Section404 of the Clean WaterAct (33 USC 1344). Unless there is a change in the law orourpublished
regulations, this determination maybe relied upon fora periodnotto exceedfive years from the date ofthis notification.
❑ The property is located in one ofthe 20 Coastal Counties subject to regulation underthe Coastal Area Management Act (CAMAS
You should contactthe Division ofCoastalManagementin Morehead City, NC, at [phone] to determinetheir
requirements.
Placement o f dredged or fill material within waters of the US, including wetlands, without a Department ofthe Army peunit may
constitute a violation of Section 3 01 of the CleanWaterAct (3 3 USC § 1311). Placement of dredged or fill material, construction or
placement of structures, or work within navigable waters ofthe United States without a Department of the Armypermit may
constitute a violation of Sections 9 and/or 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act (33 USC § 401 and/or403). If you have any questions
regarding this determination and/or the Corps regulatory program, please contact Krystvnka B Sugar at 252-545-0507 or
krystynka.b.stygm(a)usace army.mil.
C. Basis For Determination: Basis For Determination: Based on information submitted by the applicant
and available to the U.S, Army Corps of Engineers, the project area exhibits criteria for waters of the
U.S. as defined in 33 CFR 328, Regulatory Guidance Letter 05-05, the 1987 Wetland Delineation
Manual, and/or the Regional Supplement to the 1987 Manual: Eastern Piedmont and Mountains v2.0.
See the preliminary jurisdictional determination form dated 04/02/2021 included in the file.
D. Remarks: See Delineation map dated 04/01/2021.
E. Attention USDA Program Participants
This delineation/determinationhas been conductedto identify the limits of Corps' Clean Water Act jurisdiction for the particular site
identified in this request. The delineation/determination may notbe valid for the wetland conservation provisions of the Food Security
Act of 1985. If you or your tenant are USDA Program participants, or anticipateparticipation in USDA programs, you should request
a certified wetland determination from the local office of the Natural Resources Conservation Service, prior to starting work.
F. Appeals Information (This information applies only to approved jurisdictional determinations as indicated in B.
above)
This correspondence constitutes an approvedjurisdictional determination forthe above described site. If you objectto this
determination, you mayrequest an administrative appeal under Corps regulations at 3 3CFRPart331. Enclosed you will find a
Notification ofAppeal Process (NAP) fact sheet andrequest for appeal (RFA) form. Ifyourequest to appeal this determination you
must submit a completed RFA form to the following address:
US Army Corps of Engineers
South Atlantic Division
Attn: Phillip Shannin, Review Officer
60 Forsyth Street SW, Room 1 OM 15
Atlanta,Georgia 30303-8801
In order for an RFA to be accepted by the Corps, the Corps must determine that it is complete, that it meets the criteria for appeal
under 33 CFR part 331.5, and that it has been received by the Division Office within 60 days ofthe date ofthe NAP. Should you
decide to submit an RFA form, it must be received at the above address byNot applicable.
**It is not necessary to submit an RFA form to the Division Office if you do not object to the determination in this correspondence.**
Corps Regulatory Official: / G
ou
Date of JD:4/2/2021 ExpirationDate ofJD: Not applicable

SAW-2021-00263
The Wilmington District is committed to providing the highest level of support to the public. To help us ensure we
continue to do so, please complete the Customer Satisfaction Survey located at
http://corpsmapu.usace.army.mil/cm_apex/Pp=l 36:4:0
Copy Furnished:
Property Owners:
Mitchell & Melanie P Belk
120 Belk Road
Mooresville,NC 28115
MitchellB Belk
1830 Charlotte Hwy
Mooresville, NC 28115
Susan McCarter&Daphne GNeel
312 Wood Duck Place
Mooresville, NC 28117
Thomas CarrikerE III ETAL
145 Shinnville Road
Mooresville,NC 28115
JenniferM Holt
108 Mills Plantation Circle
Troutman, NC 28166
Jennifer O Meadows
108 Mills Plantation Circle
Troutman, NC 2 8166
Agent: Atlas Environmental Inc.
Jennifer Robertson
Address: 338 S. Sharon Amity Road, # 411
Charlotte, NC 28211
Telephone Number. [phone]
E-mail: jrobertson aaatlasenv.com

t�'EST FOR APPEAL
Applicant: Caballero Holdings.LLC,GeeHarvey File Number: SAW-2021-00263 Date:4/2/2021
Attached is:
See Section below
INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT (Standard Permit or Letter of permission)
A
❑
PROFFERED PERMIT (Standard Permit or Letter of permission)
B
❑
PERMIT DENIAL
C
APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
D
®
PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
E
SECTION I -The following identifies your rights and options regarding an administrative appeal of the above decision.
Additional information maybe found atorhtt12:I/),vww.usace,an7i v.miUMission5/CivilWorks/Refit:lato!�Pro_gamandPeniiits.aspx
or the Corps regulations at 33 CFR Part331.
A: INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT: You may accept or object to the permit.
• ACCEPT: If you received a Standard Permit, you may sign the permit document and return it to the district engineer for final
authorization. If you received a Letter of Permission (LOP), you may accept the LOP and your work is authorized. Your
signature on the Standard Permit or acceptance of the LOP means that you accept the permit in its entirety, and waive all
rights to appeal the permit, including its terms and conditions, and approvedjurisdictionaldetertninations associated with the
permit.
• OBJECT: If you object to the permit (Standard orLOP) because of certain terms and conditions therein, you may request
that the permit be modified accordingly. You must complete Section II of this form and return the form to the district
engineer. Your objections must be received by the district engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice, or you will
forfeit your right to appeal the permit in the future. Upon receipt ofyour letter, the district engineer will evaluate your
objections and may: (a)modify the permit to address allof yourconcems, (b) modify the permit to address some ofyour
objections, or (c) not modify the permit having determined that the permit should be issued as previously written. After
evaluatingyourobjections, the district engineer will send you a proffered permit for your reconsideration, as indicated in
Section B below.
B: PROFFERED PERMIT: You may accept or appeal the permit
• ACCEPT: If you received a Standard Permit, you may sign the permit document and return it to the district engineer for final
authorization. If you received a Letter of Permission (LOP), you may accept the LOP and yourwork is authorized. Your
signature on the Standard Permit or acceptance of the LOP means that you accept the permit in its entirety, and waive all
rights to appealthe permit, including its terms and conditions, and approved jurisdictional determinations associated with the
permit.
• APPEAL: If you choose to decline the proffered permit (Standard or LOP) because of certain terms and conditions therein,
you may appeal the declined permit underthe Corps of Engineers Administrative Appeal Process by completing Section II of
this form and sendingthe form to the division engineer. This form must be received by the division engineer within 60 days
of the date of this notice.
C: PERMIT DENIAL: You may appeal the denialof a permit under the Corps of Engineers Administrative Appeal Process by
completing Section II of this form and sending the form to the division engineer. This form must be received by the division
engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice.
D: APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERNIINATION: You may acceptor appeal the approved JD or provide new
information.
• ACCEPT: You do not need to notify the Corps to accept an approved JD. Failure to notify the Corps within 60 days of the
date of this notice, means that you accept the approved JD in its entirety, and waive all rights to appealthe approved JD.
• APPEAL: If you disagree with the approved JD, you may appeal the approved JD under the Corps of Engineers
Administrative Appeal Process by completing Section II of this form and sending the form to the district engineer. This form
must be received by the division engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice.

E: PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION: You do not need to respond to the Corps regarding the
preliminary JD. The Preliminary JD is not appealable. If you wish, you may request an approved JD (which may be appealed),
by contacting the Corps district for further instruction. Also you may provide new information for further consideration by the
Corps to reevaluate the JD.
SECTION II -REQUEST FOR APPEAL or OBJECTIONS TO AN INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT .
REASONS FOR APPEAL OR OBJECTIONS: (Describe yourreasonsforappealingthe decision oryourobjections to an initial
proffered permit in clear concise statements. You may attach additional information to this form to clarify where yourreasons or
objections are addressed in the administrative record.)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: The appeal is limited to a review of the administrative record, the Corps memorandum forthe
record of the appeal conference ormeeting, and any supplemental information that the review officerhas determined is needed to
clarify the administrative record. Neither the appellant northe Corps may add new information oranalyses to the record.
However, you may provide additional information to clarify the location of information that is already in the administrative
record.
POINT OF CONTACT FOR QUESTIONS OR INFORMATION:
If you have questions regardingthis decision and/orthe
If you only have questions regardingthe appea I process you may
appealprocess you may contact:
also contact:
District Engineer, Wilmington Regulatory Division
Mr. Phillip Shannin,AdministrativeAppeal Review Officer
Attn: Krystynka B Stygar
CESAD-PDO
Charlotte Regulatory Office
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, South Atlantic Division
U.S Army Corps of Engineers
60 Forsyth Street, Room 1 OM 15
8430 University Executive Park Drive, Suite 615
Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8801
Charlotte, North Carolina28262
Phone: [phone]
RIGHT OF ENTRY: Your signature below grants the right of entry to Corps of Engineers personnel, and any government
consultants, to conduct investigations of the project site during the course of the appealprocess. You will be provided a 15-day
notice of any site investigation, and will have the opportunity to participate in a 11 site investi rations.
Date:
Telephone number:
Signature of appellant or agent.
For appeals on Initial Proffered Permits send this form to:
District Engineer, Wilmington Regulatory Division, Attn: Krystynka B Stygar, 8430 University Executive Park, Suite 615,
Charlotte, North Carolina, 28262
For Permit denials, Proffered Permits and Approved Jurisdictional Determinations send this form to:
Division Engineer, Commander, U.S. Army Engineer Division, South Atlantic, Attn: Mr. Phillip Shannin, Administrative
Appeal Officer, CESAD-PDO, 60 Forsyth Street, Room 1 OM15, Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8801
Phone: [phone]

PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (PJD) FORM
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR PJD: 4/2/2021
B. NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERSON REQUESTING PJD: Caballero Holdings, LLC, Gee Harvey, 3840
Windermere Parkway Suite 402, Cumming, GA 30041
C. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER: Wilmington District, Belk Residential, SAW-2021-
00263
D. PROJECT LOCATION(S) AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION: Project contains multiple parcels
near the location of 120 Belk Road, Mooresville, Iredell County, North Carolina. PIN(s): 4659407004,
4658495222, 4658585819, 4658573750,4659702086,4658792995, 4659705097,4659705175,4659704103
(USE THE TABLE BELOW TO DOCUMENT MULTIPLE AQUATIC RESOURCES
AND/OR AQUATIC RESOURCES AT DIFFERENT SITES)
State: NC County:Iredell City: Mooresville
Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format): Latitude:35.63013 Longitude:-80.83370
Universal Transverse Mercator:
NAD 83
Name of nearest waterbody: Cornelius Creek
E. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
❑ Office (Desk) Determination. Date:
®Field Determination. Date(s): April 1, 2021
TABLE OFAQUATIC RESOURCES INREVIEW AREA WHICH "MAY BE" SUBJECT TO
REGULATORY JURISDICTION
Site Number
Latitude
(decimal
degrees)
Longitude
(decimal
degrees)
Estimated
amountof
aquatic
resources in
reviewarea
(acreage and
linear feet, if
applicable
Type of aquatic
resources (i.e., wetland
vs. non -wetland waters)
Geographic
authority to
which the
aquatic resource
"may be" subject
(i.e., Section 404
or Section
10/404)
Cornelius Creek
35.62685
-80.83998
2855 LF
Non -wetland water
Section 404
CH 100
35.6300
-80.83878
3429 LF
Non -wetland water
Section 404
CH 200
35.62870
-80.83612
3678 LF
Non -wetland water
Section 404
CH 200 A
35.631480
-80.83141
31 LF
Non -wetland water
Section 404
CH 300
35.63235
-80.83173
856 LF
Non -wetland water
Section 404
CH 500
35.62581
-80.83211
1141 LF
Non -wetland water
Section 404
CH 600
35.62439
-80.83146
362 LF
Non -wetland water
Section 404
W L 1000
35.63058
-80.83855
0.011 Acres
Wetland
Section 404
WL 2000
35.62967
-80.83500
0.026 Acres
Wetland
Section 404
W L 2100
35.63009
-80.83379
0.002 Acres
Wetland
Section 404
W L 2200
35.63059
-80.83328
0.041 Acres
Wetland
Section 404
WL2300
35.63123
-80.83138
0.014Acres
Wetland
Section 404
W L 2400
35.63140
-80.83061
0.739 Acres
Wetland
Section 404
W L 3000
35.63289
-80.83162
0.001 Acres
Wetland
Section 404
W L 5000
35.62639
-80.83259
0.005 Acres
Wetland
Section 404
Pond 1
35.63140
-80.83061
0.164Acres
Non -wetland Water
I Section 404

1. The Corps of Engineers believes that there may be jurisdictional aquatic resources in the
review area, and the requestor of this PJD is hereby advised of his or her option to request
and obtain an approved JD (AJD) for that review area based on an informed decision after
having discussed the various types of JDs and their characteristics and circumstances when
they may be appropriate.
2. In any circumstance where a permit applicant obtains an individual permit, or a Nationwide
General Permit (NWP) or other general permit verification requiring "pre- construction
notification" (PCN), or requests verification for a non -reporting NWP or other general
permit, and the permit applicant has not requested an AJD for the activity, the permit
applicant is hereby made aware that: (1) the permit applicant has elected to seek a permit
authorization based on a PJD, which does not make an official determination of
jurisdictional aquatic resources; (2) the applicant has the option to request an AJD before
accepting the terms and conditions of the permit authorization, and that basing a permit
authorization on an AJD could possibly result in less compensatory mitigation being
required or different special conditions; (3) the applicant has the right to request an
individual permit rather than accepting the terms and conditions of the NWP or other
general permit authorization; (4) the applicant can accept a permit authorization and
thereby agree to comply with all the terms and conditions of that permit, including
whatever mitigation requirements the Corps has determined to be necessary; (5)
undertaking any activity in reliance upon the subjectpermit authorization without
requesting an AJD constitutes the applicant's acceptance of the use of the PJD; (6)
accepting a permit authorization (e.g., signing a proffered individual permit) or undertaking
any activity in reliance on any form of Corps permit authorization based on a PJD
constitutes agreement that all aquatic resources in the review area affected in any way by
that activity will be treated as jurisdictional, and waives any challenge to such jurisdiction
in any administrative or judicial compliance or enforcement action, or in any administrative
appeal or in any Federal court; and (7) whether the applicant elects to use either an AJD or
a PJD, the JD will be processed as soon as practicable. Further, an AJD, a proffered
individual permit (and all terms and conditions contained therein), or individual permit
denial can be administratively appealed pursuant to 33 C.F.R. Part 331. If, during an
administrative appeal, it becomes appropriate to make an official determination whether
geographic jurisdiction exists over aquatic resources in the review area, or to provide an
official delineation of jurisdictional aquatic resources in the review area, the Corps will
provide an AJD to accomplish that result, as soon as is practicable. This PJD finds that
there "maybe"waters of the U.S. and/or that there "maybe" navigable waters of the U.S.
on the subject review area, and identifies all aquatic features in the review area that could
be affectedby the proposed activity, based on the following information:
SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for PJD (check all that apply) Checked items are included in the administrative

record and are appropriately cited:
® Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor:
Map: Atlas Environmental for Caballero Holdings. LLC
® Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor. Datasheets:
® Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report.
❑ Office doesnotconcurwith data sheets/delineation report. Rationale:
❑ Data sheets prepared by the Corps:
El Corps navigable waters' study:
® U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas:
® USGS NHD data:
® USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps:
® U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name: Shepard & Mooresville Quad
® Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation: GIS Database, Web Soil Survey accessed
10/29/2020
National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name: GIS Database
❑ State/local wetland inventory map(s):
® FEMA/FIRM maps:
❑ 100-year Floodplain Elevation is: (National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929)
® Photographs: ® Aerial (Name & Date): Aerials
or ® Other (Name & Date): November 6.2020 Site photographs
❑ Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter:
®Other information (please specify): aquatic Resource Sketch Map dated 11/16/2020,Lidar Map, NCSAM
Forms. Site Visit conducted 04/01/2021
IMPORTANT NOTE: The information recorded on this form has not necessarily been verified by the Corps
and should not be relied upon for later jurisdictional determinations.
4�y* ))��
Signature and date of Regulatory
staff member completing PJD
4/2/2021
Signature and date of person requesting PJD
(REQUIRED, unless obtainingthe signature is
impracticable)'
t Districts may establish timeframes for requester to return signed PJD forms. If the requester does not respondwithin the established
time frame, the district may presume concurrence and no additional follow up is necessary prior to finalizing an action.

1 Sketch M provided for illustrative purposes and
Aquatic fZeSOUCCe SiCetCi1 Map 1 relimina� annin only.Not intended to be relied upon
�o J c o I �—� for exact location, dimension, or orientation. All findings
and assessments are subject to verification from the
Army Corps of Engineers, NC Division of Water
�. Resources, and/or other appropriate local authorities.
ORO— 4;. Do not reproduce map set except in its entirety.
Legend
O Review Area
OIredell Co. Parcels
2 Ft Contours
Streets
Delineation
Intermittent
M Perennial
Pond
Wetland
SW Culvert
U
0 300 600 900 1200 Ft
Project Name: Belk Residential e,�
% llJ Location: 120 Belk Road Mooresville, NC 28115
MCW TMYMlMCINR
sloop"
1xiONMENTAL For: Caballero Holdings, LLC Attn: Mr. George Harvey ,(,�,R�.,�
Paae 1 of 7 Coordinates: 35.63013,-80.83370 Date: November 16, 2020 Updated April 01, 2021

Governor Roy Cooper
July 29, 2021
North Carolina Department of Natural and Cultural Resources
State Historic Preservation Office
Ramona M. Bartos, Administrator
Secretary D. Reid Wilson
Austin Baggarley
Atlas Environmental, Inc.
338 South Sharon Amity Road, #411
Charlotte, NC 28211
abaggarley(n atlasenvi.com
Re: Construct Belk Residential development, 120 Belk Road Mooresville, Iredell County, ER 21-1622
Dear Mr. Baggarley:
Thank you for your email of June 18, 2021, regarding the above -referenced undertaking. We have reviewed
your submission and offer the following comments. We apologize for the delay and any inconvenience it may
have caused.
We have conducted a review of the project and are aware of no historic resources which would be affected by
the project. Therefore, we have no comment on the project as proposed.
However, we would like to request that prior to its demolition interior photographs of the structure ID0754/1836
Charlotte Highway, be taken and sent to us for filing in the survey record. Your time and efforts would be much
appreciated. We would be happy to provide any additional assistance you may need.
There are no known archaeological sites within the proposed project area. Based on our knowledge of the area,
it is unlikely that any archaeological resources that may be eligible for inclusion in the National Register of
Historic Places will be affected by the project. We, therefore, recommend that no archaeological investigation
be conducted in connection with this project.
The above comments are made pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act and the
Advisory Council on Historic Preservation's Regulations for Compliance with Section 106 codified at 36 CFR
Part 800.
Thank you for your cooperation and consideration. If you have questions concerning the above comment,
contact Renee Gledhill -Earley, environmental review coordinator, at 919-814-6579
or environmental.review(a,ncdcr.gov. In all future communication concerning this project, please cite the above
referenced tracking number.
(Sincerely, Aa
Ramona Bartos, Deputy
(� State Historic Preservation Officer
Location: 109 East Jones Street, Raleigh NC 27601 Mailing Address: 4617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh NC 27699-4617 Telephone/Fax: [phone]-6898

u.S.
II
United States Department of the Interior `"�'"����'
FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
Asheville Field Office
160 Zillicoa Street
Asheville, North Carolina 28801
July 22, 2021
Jennifer Robertson
Atlas Environmental
338 South Sharon Amity Road #411
Charlotte, North Carolina 28211
jrobertsona,atlasenvi.com
Subject: Belk Road Residential Development; Iredell County, North Carolina
Dear Jennifer Robertson:
The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) has reviewed the information provided in your
email correspondence dated June 18, 2021 wherein you solicit our comments regarding project -
mediated impacts to federally protected species. We submit the following comments in
accordance with the provisions of the Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act, as amended
(16 U.S.C. 661-667e); the National Environmental Policy Act (42 U.S.C. §4321 et seq.); and
section 7 of the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531-1543) (Act).
Project Description
According to the information provided, the Applicant proposes to construct an undisclosed
residential development on approximately 221 acres in Mooresville, North Carolina which will
require authorization from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers for impacts to Waters of the
United States. Based on the information provided and aerial imagery, onsite habitats are
dominated by successional mixed forest and undeveloped open space, but also contain forested
riparian and wetland habitats (Cornelius Creek and its unnamed tributaries), maintained road
rights of way, and transitional- edge habitats. No project design plans or a description of impacts
to onsite habitats have been provided at this time.
Federally Listed Endangered and Threatened Species
According to Service records, suitable summer roosting habitat may be present in the action area
(50CFR 402.02) for the federally threatened northern long-eared bat (Myotis septentrionalis).
However, the final 4(d) rule, (effective as of February 16, 2016) exempts incidental take of
northern long-eared bat associated with activities that occur greater than 0.25 miles from a
known hibernation site, and greater than 150 feet from a known, occupied maternity roost during
the pup season (June 1— July 31). Based on the information provided, the project would occur at
a location where any incidental take that may result from associated activities is exempt under
the 4(d) rule for this species. Although not required, we encourage the Applicant to avoid
any associated tree clearing activities during this animal's maternity roosting season from
May 15 — August 15.

Table 4.1.1 of your report indicates that suitable habitat is present onsite for dwarf -flowered
heartleaf and that surveys for this species were conducted on October 16, 2020. Provided that
targeted botanical surveys of all potential habitats for dwarf -flowered heartleaf in the action area
were conducted at that time' and no members of the genus Hexastylis (except H. arifolia) were
detected, we would concur with a may affect, not likely affect determination for this species
from the appropriate action agency.
Your correspondence indicates that H. arifolia was observed onsite and references photographs
of these observations (section 3.3.2), but no images depicting this species were included in your
biological evaluation. Please provide the images referenced above to this office for our review.
Aerial imagery suggests that suitable nesting habitat may be present onsite for bald eagle
(Haliaeetus leucocephalus), but this federally protected species was not considered in your
evaluation. The bald eagle has been removed from the federal list of endangered and threatened
species due to its recovery. However, this species is afforded legal protection by the Bald and
Golden Eagle Protection Act (16 U.S.C. 668 668d) and the Migratory Bird Treaty Act (16 U.S.C.
703 712). The Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act, enacted in 1940, and amended several
times, prohibits anyone without a permit issued by the Secretary of the Interior from "taking"
bald eagles, including their parts, nests, or eggs. "Take" includes pursue, shoot, shoot at, poison,
wound, kill, capture, trap, collect, molest or disturb (16 U.S.C. 668c; 50 CFR 22.3). "Disturb"
means "To agitate or bother a bald or golden eagle to the degree that interferes with or interrupts
normal breeding, feeding, or sheltering habits, causing injury, death, or nest abandonment." In
addition to immediate impacts, these definitions also cover impacts that result from human
induced alterations initiated around a previously used nest site during a time when eagles are not
present if, upon an eagle's return, such alterations agitate or bother the eagle to a degree that
interferes with or interrupts normal breeding, feeding, or sheltering habits and causes injury,
death, or nest abandonment.
If any active nests are located within a half mile of the project site, we request that work at the
site be restricted from mid -January through July in order to prevent adverse impacts to the bald
eagle. This will prevent disturbance of the eagles from the egg laying period until the young
fledge, which encompasses their most vulnerable times.
In accordance with the Act, it is the responsibility of the appropriate federal agency or its
designated representative to review its activities or programs and to identify any such activities
or programs that may affect endangered or threatened species or their habitats. If it is
determined that the proposed activity may adversely affect any species federally listed as
endangered or threatened, formal consultation with this office must be initiated.
Erosion and Sediment Control
'Members of the genus Hexastylis can be positively identified year-round. However, floristic
measurements are required to diagnose at least eight species in the Virginica group, including dwarf -
flowered heartleaf (Gaddy, 1987). Leaf morphology alone cannot be used to differentiate dwarf -flowered
heartleaf from its congeners in the Virginica group.

Measures to control sediment and erosion should be installed before any ground -disturbing
activities occur. Grading and backfilling should be minimized, and existing native vegetation
should be retained (if possible) to maintain riparian cover for fish and wildlife. Disturbed areas
should be revegetated with native vegetation as soon as the project is completed. Ground
disturbance should be limited to what will be stabilized quickly, preferably by the end of the
workday. Natural fiber matting (coir) should be used for erosion control as synthetic
netting can trap animals and persist in the environment beyond its intended purpose.
The Service appreciates the opportunity to provide these comments. Please contact Mr. Byron
Hamstead of our staff at [e-mail] if you have any questions. In any future
correspondence concerning this project, please reference our Log Number 4-2-21-343.
Sincerely,
- - original signed - -
Janet Mizzi
Field Supervisor
References
Gaddy, L. L. (1987). A review of the taxonomy and biogeography of Hexastylis
(Aristolochiaceae). Castanea, 186-196.

NC SAM FIELD ASSESSMENT RESULTS
user manual version z.i
USACE AID #: NCDWR #:
INSTRUCTIONS: Attach a sketch of the assessment area and photographs. Attach a copy of the USGS 7.5-minute topographic quadrangle,
and circle the location of the stream reach under evaluation. If multiple stream reaches will be evaluated on the same property, identify and
number all reaches on the attached map, and include a separate form for each reach. See the NC SAM User Manual for detailed descriptions
and explanations of requested information. Record in the "Notes/Sketch" section if supplementary measurements were performed. See the
NC SAM User Manual for examples of additional measurements that may be relevant.
NOTE EVIDENCE OF STRESSORS AFFECTING THE ASSESSMENT AREA (do not need to be within the assessment area).
PROJECT/SITE INFORMATION:
1. Project name (if any): Belk Residential 2. Date of evaluation: 04/05/2021
3. Applicant/owner name: Caballero Holdings, LLC 4. Assessor name/organization: Atlas Environmental
5. County: Iredell 6. Nearest named water body
7. River basin: Catawba on USGS 7.5-minute quad: Cornelius Creek
8. Site coordinates (decimal degrees, at lower end of assessment reach): 35.62801,-80.83987
STREAM INFORMATION: (depth and width can be approximations)
9. Site number (show on attached map): S1 10. Length of assessment reach evaluated (feet): 100
11. Channel depth from bed (in riffle, if present) to top of bank (feet): 2 ❑Unable to assess channel depth.
12. Channel width at top of bank (feet): 6 13. Is assessment reach a swamp steam? ❑Yes ❑No
14. Feature type: ®Perennial flow []Intermittent flow []Tidal Marsh Stream
STREAM CATEGORY INFORMATION:
15. NC SAM Zone: ❑ Mountains (M) ® Piedmont (P) ❑ Inner Coastal Plain (1) ❑ Outer Coastal Plain (0)
16. Estimated geomorphic ®A �►� J ❑B
valley shape (skip for
Tidal Marsh Stream): (more sinuous stream, flatter valley slope) (less sinuous stream, steeper valley slope)
17. Watershed size: (skip ❑Size 1 (< 0.1 mi2) ®Size 2 (0.1 to < 0.5 mil) []Size 3 (0.5 to < 5 mil) ❑Size 4 (z 5 miz)
for Tidal Marsh Stream)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION:
18. Were regulatory considerations evaluated? ®Yes []No If Yes, check all that apply to the assessment area.
❑Section 10 water ❑Classified Trout Waters ®Water Supply Watershed (❑1 ❑11 ❑III ®IV ❑V)
❑Essential Fish Habitat ❑Primary Nursery Area ❑ High Quality Waters/Outstanding Resource Waters
❑Publicly owned property ❑NCDWR Riparian buffer rule in effect ❑Nutrient Sensitive Waters
❑Anadromous fish ❑303(d) List ❑CAMA Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)
❑Documented presence of a federal and/or state listed protected species within the assessment area.
List species:
El Designated Critical Habitat (list species)
19. Are additional stream information/supplementary measurements included in "Notes/Sketch" section or attached? ❑Yes ®No
1. Channel Water — assessment reach metric (skip for Size 1 streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
®A Water throughout assessment reach.
❑B No flow, water in pools only.
❑C No water in assessment reach.
2. Evidence of Flow Restriction — assessment reach metric
❑A At least 10% of assessment reach in -stream habitat or riffle -pool sequence is severely affected by a flow restriction or fill to the
point of obstructing flow or a channel choked with aquatic macrophytes or ponded water or impoundment on flood or ebb within
the assessment reach (examples: undersized or perched culverts, causeways that constrict the channel, tidal gates, debris jams,
beaver dams).
®B Not A
3. Feature Pattern — assessment reach metric
❑A A majority of the assessment reach has altered pattern (examples: straightening, modification above or below culvert).
®B Not
4. Feature Longitudinal Profile —assessment reach metric
®A Majority of assessment reach has a substantially altered stream profile (examples: channel down -cutting, existing damming, over
widening, active aggradation, dredging, and excavation where appropriate channel profile has not reformed from any of these
disturbances).
❑B Not A
5. Signs of Active Instability — assessment reach metric
Consider only current instability, not past events from which the stream has currently recovered. Examples of instability include
active bank failure, active channel down -cutting (head -cut), active widening, and artificial hardening (such as concrete, gabion, rip -rap).
®A < 10% of channel unstable
❑B 10 to 25% of channel unstable
❑C > 25% of channel unstable

6. Streamside Area Interaction — streamside area metric
Consider for the
LB RB
❑A ❑A
®B ®B
❑C ❑C
Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB).
Little or no evidence of conditions that adversely affect reference interaction
Moderate evidence of conditions (examples: berms, levees, down -cutting, aggradation, dredging) that adversely affect
reference interaction (examples: limited streamside area access, disruption of flood flows through streamside area, leaky
or intermittent bulkheads, causeways with floodplain constriction, minor ditching [including mosquito ditching])
Extensive evidence of conditions that adversely affect reference interaction (little to no floodplain/intertidal zone access
[examples: causeways with floodplain and channel constriction, bulkheads, retaining walls, fill, stream incision, disruption
of flood flows through streamside area] or too much floodplainfintertidal zone access [examples: impoundments, intensive
mosquito ditching]) or floodplain/intertidal zone unnaturally absent or assessment reach is a man-made feature on an
interstream divide
Water Quality Stressors — assessment reach/intertidal zone metric
Check all that apply.
❑A Discolored water in stream or intertidal zone (milky white, blue, unnatural water discoloration, oil sheen, stream foam)
❑B Excessive sedimentation (burying of stream features or intertidal zone)
❑C Noticeable evidence of pollutant discharges entering the assessment reach and causing a water quality problem
❑D Odor (not including natural sulfide odors)
❑E Current published or collected data indicating degraded water quality in the assessment reach. Cite source in "Notes/Sketch"
section.
❑F Livestock with access to stream or intertidal zone
❑G Excessive algae in stream or intertidal zone
❑H Degraded marsh vegetation in the intertidal zone (removal, burning, regular mowing, destruction, etc)
❑I Other: (explain in "Notes/Sketch" section)
®J Little to no stressors
8. Recent Weather — watershed metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
For Size 1 or 2 streams, D1 drought or higher is considered a drought; for Size 3 or 4 streams, D2 drought or higher is considered a drought.
❑A Drought conditions and no rainfall or rainfall not exceeding 1 inch within the last 48 hours
❑B Drought conditions and rainfall exceeding 1 inch within the last 48 hours
®C No drought conditions
9. Large or Dangerous Stream — assessment reach metric
❑Yes ®No Is stream is too large or dangerous to assess? If Yes, skip to Metric 13 (Streamside Area Ground Surface Condition).
10. Natural In -stream Habitat Types — assessment reach metric
10a. ❑Yes ❑No Degraded in -stream habitat over majority of the assessment reach (examples of stressors include excessive
sedimentation, mining, excavation, in -stream hardening [for example, rip -rap], recent dredging, and snagging)
(evaluate for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams only, then skip to Metric 12)
10b. Check all that occur (occurs if > 5% coverage of assessment reach)
(skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams)
❑A
Multiple aquatic macrophytes and aquatic mosses
a y
❑F
5% oysters or other natural hard bottoms
(include liverworts, lichens, and algal mats)
� m
❑G
Submerged aquatic vegetation
®B
Multiple sticks and/or leaf packs and/or emergent
w
❑H
Low -tide refugia (pools)
vegetation
-6 t
C, ❑I
Sand bottom
❑C
Multiple snags and logs (including lap trees)
re,
❑J
5% vertical bank along the marsh
®D
5% undercut banks and/or root mats and/or roots
02
❑K
Little or no habitat
in banks extend to the normal wetted perimeter
❑E
Little or no habitat
**************...****""****"*REMAINING
QUESTIONS ARE NOT APPLICABLE FOR TIDAL MARSH STREAMS*****"'*********
11. Bedform and Substrate —assessment reach metric (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
11a. ❑Yes ®No is assessment reach in a natural sand -bed stream? (skip for Coastal Plain streams)
11b. Bedform evaluated. Check the appropriate box(es).
®A Riffle -run section (evaluate 11c)
❑B Pool -glide section (evaluate 11d)
❑C Natural bedform absent (skip to Metric 12, Aquatic Life)
11 c. In riffle sections, check all that occur below the normal wetted perimeter of the assessment reach —whether or not submerged. Check
at least one box in each row (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams). Not Present (NP) = absent, Rare
(R) = present but < 10%, Common (C) _ > 10-40%, Abundant (A) _ > 40-70%, Predominant (P) _ > 70%. Cumulative percentages
should not exceed 100% for each assessment reach.
NP
R
C
A
P
®
❑
❑
❑
Cl
Bedrock/saprolite
®
❑
❑
❑
❑
Boulder (256 — 4096 mm)
❑
®
❑
❑
❑
Cobble (64 — 256 mm)
❑
❑
❑
Cl
®
Gravel (2 — 64 mm)
❑
❑
®
❑
❑
Sand (.062 — 2 mm)
❑
®
❑
❑
❑
Silt/clay (< 0.062 mm)
❑
®
❑
❑
❑
Detritus
®
❑
❑
❑
❑
Artificial (rip -rap, concrete, etc.)
11 d. ❑Yes ❑No Are pools filled with sediment? (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)

12. Aquatic Life — assessment reach metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
12a. ®Yes ❑No Was an in -stream aquatic life assessment performed as described in the User Manual?
If No, select one of the following reasons and skip to Metric 13. ❑No Water ❑Other:
12b. ®Yes []No Are aquatic organisms present in the assessment reach (look in riffles, pools, then snags)? If Yes, check all that
apply. If No, skip to Metric 13.
>1 Numbers over columns refer to "individuals" for Size 1 and 2 streams and "taxa" for Size 3 and 4 streams.
❑Adult frogs
❑Aquatic reptiles
[]Aquatic macrophytes and aquatic mosses (include
❑ Beetles
❑Caddisfly larvae (T)
❑Asian clam (Corbicula)
®Crustacean (isopod/amphipod/crayfish/shrimp)
❑Damselfly and dragonfly larvae
❑Dipterans
[]Mayfly larvae (E)
❑Megaloptera (alderfly, fishfly, dobsonfly larvae)
❑Midges/mosquito larvae
liverworts, lichens, and algal mats)
❑Mosquito fish (Gambusia) or mud minnows (Umbra pygmaea)
❑Mussels/Clams (not Corbicula)
❑Other fish
®Salamanders/tadpoles
❑Snails
®Stonefly larvae (P)
❑Tipulid larvae
❑Worms/leeches
13. Streamside Area Ground Surface Condition — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams and B valley types)
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB). Consider storage capacity with regard to both overbank flow and upland runoff.
LB RB
®A ®A Little or no alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area
❑B ❑B Moderate alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area
❑C ❑C Severe alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area (examples: ditches, fill, soil compaction,
livestock disturbance, buildings, man-made levees, drainage pipes)
14. Streamside Area Water Storage — streamside area metric (skip for Size 1 streams, Tidal Marsh Streams, and B valley types)
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB) of the streamside area.
LB RB
❑A ❑A Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water z 6 inches deep
❑B ❑B Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water 3 to 6 inches deep
®C ®C Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water < 3 inches deep
15. Wetland Presence — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB). Do not consider wetlands outside of the streamside area or within the normal
wetted perimeter of assessment reach.
LB RB
❑Y ❑Y Are wetlands present in the streamside area?
®N ®N
16. Baseflow Contributors — assessment reach metric (skip for Size 4 streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all contributors within the assessment reach or within view of and draining to the assessment reach.
❑A Streams and/or springs (jurisdictional discharges)
❑B Ponds (include wet detention basins; do not include sediment basins or dry detention basins)
❑C Obstruction passing flow during low -flow periods within the assessment area (beaver dam, leaky dam, bottom -release dam, weir)
®D Evidence of bank seepage or sweating (iron in water indicates seepage)
®E Stream bed or bank soil reduced (dig through deposited sediment if present)
OF None of the above
17. Baseflow Detractors — assessment area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all that apply.
❑A Evidence of substantial water withdrawals from the assessment reach (includes areas excavated for pump installation)
❑B Obstruction not passing flow during low -flow periods affecting the assessment reach (ex: watertight dam, sediment deposit)
❑C Urban stream (Z 24% impervious surface for watershed)
❑D Evidence that the streamside area has been modified resulting in accelerated drainage into the assessment reach
❑E Assessment reach relocated to valley edge
®F None of the above
18. Shading — assessment reach metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider aspect. Consider "leaf -on" condition.
®A Stream shading is appropriate for stream category (may include gaps associated with natural processes)
❑B Degraded (example: scattered trees)
❑C Stream shading is gone or largely absent

19. Buffer Width — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider "vegetated buffer" and "wooded buffer" separately for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB) starting at the top of bank out
to the first break.
Vegetated Wooded
LB RB LB
RB
®A ®A ®A
®A >_ 100 feet wide or extends to the edge of the watershed
❑B ❑B ❑B
❑B From 50 to < 100 feet wide
❑C ❑C ❑C
❑C From 30 to < 50 feet wide
❑D ❑D ❑D
❑D From 10 to < 30 feet wide
❑E ❑E ❑E
❑E < 10 feet wide or no trees
20. Buffer Structure — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB) for Metric 19 ("Vegetated" Buffer Width).
LB RB
❑A ❑A
Mature forest
®B ®B
Non -mature woody vegetation or modified vegetation structure
El El
Herbaceous vegetation with or without a strip of trees < 10 feet wide
❑D ❑D
Maintained shrubs
❑E ❑E
Little or no vegetation
21. Buffer Stressors — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all appropriate boxes for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB). Indicate if listed stressor abuts stream (Abuts), does not abut but is
within 30 feet of stream (< 30 feet), or is between 30 to 50 feet of stream (30-50 feet).
If none of the following stressors occurs on either bank, check here and skip to Metric 22:
Abuts < 30 feet 30-50 feet
LB RB LB RB LB RB
❑A ❑A ❑A ❑A ❑A ❑A Row crops
❑B ❑B ❑B ❑B ❑B ❑B Maintained turf
❑C ❑C ❑C ❑C ❑C ❑C Pasture (no livestock)/commercial horticulture
❑D ❑D ❑D ❑D ❑D ❑D Pasture (active livestock use)
22. Stem Density — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB) for Metric 19 ("Wooded" Buffer Width).
LB RB
❑A ®A Medium to high stem density
®B ❑B Low stem density
❑C ❑C No wooded riparian buffer or predominantly herbaceous species or bare ground
23. Continuity of Vegetated Buffer — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider whether vegetated buffer is continuous along stream (parallel). Breaks are areas lacking vegetation > 10 feet wide.
LB RB
®A ®A The total length of buffer breaks is < 25 percent.
❑B ❑B The total length of buffer breaks is between 25 and 50 percent.
❑C ❑C The total length of buffer breaks is > 50 percent.
24. Vegetative Composition — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Evaluate the dominant vegetation within 100 feet of each bank or to the edge of the watershed (whichever comes first) as it contributes to
assessment reach habitat.
LB RB
®A ❑A Vegetation is close to undisturbed in species present and their proportions. Lower strata composed of native species,
with non-native invasive species absent or sparse.
❑B ®B Vegetation indicates disturbance in terms of species diversity or proportions, but is still largely composed of native
species. This may include communities of weedy native species that develop after clear -cutting or clearing or
communities with non-native invasive species present, but not dominant, over a large portion of the expected strata or
communities missing understory but retaining canopy trees.
❑C El Vegetation is severely disturbed in terms of species diversity or proportions. Mature canopy is absent or communities
with non-native invasive species dominant over a large portion of expected strata or communities composed of planted
stands of non -characteristic species or communities inappropriately composed of a single species or no vegetation.
25. Conductivity — assessment reach metric (skip for all Coastal Plain streams)
25a. ❑Yes ®No Was conductivity measurement recorded?
If No, select one of the following reasons. ❑No Water ❑Other:
25b. Check the box corresponding to the conductivity measurement (units of microsiemens per centimeter).
❑A < 46 ❑B 46 to < 67 ❑C 67 to < 79 ❑D 79 to < 230 ❑E >_ 230
Notes/Sketch

Stream Site Name Belk Residential
Stream Category Pa2
Draft NC SAM Stream Rating Sheet
Accompanies User Manual Version 2.1
Date of Assessment 04/05/2021
Assessor Name/Organization Atlas Environmental
Notes of Field Assessment Form (Y/N) NO
Presence of regulatory considerations (Y/N) YES
Additional stream information/supplementary measurements included (Y/N) NO
NC SAM feature type (perennial, intermittent, Tidal Marsh Stream) Perennial
USACE/ NCDWR
Function Class Rating Summary
All Streams Intermittent
(1) Hydrology
HIGH
(2) Baseflow
HIGH
(2) Flood Flow
HIGH
(3) Streamside Area Attenuation
MEDIUM
(4) Floodplain Access
MEDIUM
(4) Wooded Riparian Buffer
MEDIUM
(4) Microtopography
LOW
(3) Stream Stability
HIGH
(4) Channel Stability
HIGH
(4) Sediment Transport
HIGH
(4) Stream Geomorphology
MEDIUM
(2) Stream/Intertidal Zone Interaction
NA
(2) Longitudinal Tidal Flow
NA
(2) Tidal Marsh Stream Stability
NA
(3) Tidal Marsh Channel Stability
NA
(3) Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology
NA
(1) Water Quality
HIGH
(2) Baseflow
HIGH
(2) Streamside Area Vegetation
HIGH
(3) Upland Pollutant Filtration
HIGH
(3) Thermoregulation
HIGH
(2) Indicators of Stressors
NO
(2) Aquatic Life Tolerance
HIGH
(2) Intertidal Zone Filtration
NA
(1) Habitat
HIGH
(2) In -stream Habitat
MEDIUM
(3) Baseflow
HIGH
(3) Substrate
MEDIUM
(3) Stream Stability
MEDIUM
(3) In -stream Habitat
MEDIUM
(2) Stream -side Habitat
HIGH
(3) Stream -side Habitat
HIGH -
(3) Thermoregulation
HIGH
(2) Tidal Marsh In -stream Habitat
NA
(3) Flow Restriction
NA
(3) Tidal Marsh Stream Stability
NA
(4) Tidal Marsh Channel Stability
NA
(4) Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology
NA
(3) Tidal Marsh In -stream Habitat
NA
(2) Intertidal Zone
NA
Overall
HIGH

NC SAM FIELD ASSESSMENT RESULTS
user manual version z.,j
USACE AID #: NCDWR #:
INSTRUCTIONS: Attach a sketch of the assessment area and photographs. Attach a copy of the USGS 7.5-minute topographic quadrangle,
and circle the location of the stream reach under evaluation. If multiple stream reaches will be evaluated on the same property, identify and
number all reaches on the attached map, and include a separate form for each reach. See the NC SAM User Manual for detailed descriptions
and explanations of requested information. Record in the "Notes/Sketch" section if supplementary measurements were performed. See the
NC SAM User Manual for examples of additional measurements that may be relevant.
NOTE EVIDENCE OF STRESSORS AFFECTING THE ASSESSMENT AREA (do not need to be within the assessment area).
PROJECT/SITE INFORMATION:
1. Project name (if any): Belk Residential 2. Date of evaluation: 04/05/2021
3. Applicant/owner name: Caballero Holdings, LLC 4. Assessor name/organization: Atlas Environmental
5. County: Iredell 6. Nearest named water body
7. River basin: Catawba on USGS 7.5-minute quad: Cornelius Creek
8. Site coordinates (decimal degrees, at lower end of assessment reach): 35.63284,-80.83767
STREAM INFORMATION: (depth and width can be approximations)
9. Site number (show on attached map): S2 10. Length of assessment reach evaluated (feet): 100
11. Channel depth from bed (in riffle, if present) to top of bank (feet): 0.75 ❑Unable to assess channel depth.
12. Channel width at top of bank (feet): 4 13. Is assessment reach a swamp steam? ❑Yes []No
14. Feature type: ®Perennial flow ❑Intermittent flow ❑Tidal Marsh Stream
STREAM CATEGORY INFORMATION:
15. NC SAM Zone: ❑ Mountains (M) ® Piedmont (P) ❑ Inner Coastal Plain (1) ❑ Outer Coastal Plain (0)
16. Estimated geomorphic ®A ❑B
valley shape (skip for
Tidal Marsh Stream): (more sinuous stream, flatter valley slope) (less sinuous stream, steeper valley slope)
17. Watershed size: (skip []Size 1 (< 0.1 mi2) ®Size 2 (0.1 to < 0.5 m12) ❑Size 3 (0.5 to < 5 mil) ❑Size 4 (z 5 mi2)
for Tidal Marsh Stream)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION:
18. Were regulatory considerations evaluated? ®Yes ❑No If Yes, check all that apply to the assessment area.
❑Section 10 water ❑Classified Trout Waters ®Water Supply Watershed (❑I Ell] ❑III ®IV ❑V)
❑Essential Fish Habitat ❑Primary Nursery Area ❑ High Quality Waters/Outstanding Resource Waters
❑Publicly owned property ❑NCDWR Riparian buffer rule in effect ❑Nutrient Sensitive Waters
❑Anadromous fish ❑303(d) List ❑CAMA Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)
❑Documented presence of a federal and/or state listed protected species within the assessment area.
List species:
[]Designated Critical Habitat (list species)
19. Are additional stream information/supplementary measurements included in "Notes/Sketch" section or attached? ❑Yes ®No
1. Channel Water- assessment reach metric (skip for Size 1 streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
®A Water throughout assessment reach.
❑B No flow, water in pools only.
❑C No water in assessment reach.
2. Evidence of Flow Restriction - assessment reach metric
❑A At least 10% of assessment reach in -stream habitat or riffle -pool sequence is severely affected by a flow restriction or fill to the
point of obstructing flow or a channel choked with aquatic macrophytes or ponded water or impoundment on flood or ebb within
the assessment reach (examples: undersized or perched culverts, causeways that constrict the channel, tidal gates, debris jams,
beaver dams).
®B Not A
3. Feature Pattern - assessment reach metric
❑A A majority of the assessment reach has altered pattern (examples: straightening, modification above or below culvert).
®B Not A
4. Feature Longitudinal Profile - assessment reach metric
®A Majority of assessment reach has a substantially altered stream profile (examples: channel down -cutting, existing damming, over
widening, active aggradation, dredging, and excavation where appropriate channel profile has not reformed from any of these
disturbances).
❑B Not A
5. Signs of Active Instability - assessment reach metric
Consider only current instability, not past events from which the stream has currently recovered. Examples of instability include
active bank failure, active channel down -cutting (head -cut), active widening, and artificial hardening (such as concrete, gabion, rip -rap).
®A < 10% of channel unstable
❑B 10 to 25% of channel unstable
❑C > 25% of channel unstable

6. Streamside Area Interaction — streamside area metric
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB).
LB RB
❑A ❑A Little or no evidence of conditions that adversely affect reference interaction
®B ®B Moderate evidence of conditions (examples: berms, levees, down -cutting, aggradation, dredging) that adversely affect
reference interaction (examples: limited streamside area access, disruption of flood flows through streamside area, leaky
or intermittent bulkheads, causeways with floodplain constriction, minor ditching [including mosquito ditching])
❑C ❑C Extensive evidence of conditions that adversely affect reference interaction (little to no floodplain/intertidal zone access
[examples: causeways with floodplain and channel constriction, bulkheads, retaining walls, fill, stream incision, disruption
of flood flows through streamside area] or too much floodplain/intertidal zone access [examples: impoundments, intensive
mosquito ditching]) or floodplain/intertidal zone unnaturally absent or assessment reach is a man-made feature on an
interstream divide
Water Quality Stressors — assessment reach/intertidal zone metric
Check all that apply.
❑A Discolored water in stream or intertidal zone (milky white, blue, unnatural water discoloration, oil sheen, stream foam)
❑B Excessive sedimentation (burying of stream features or intertidal zone)
❑C Noticeable evidence of pollutant discharges entering the assessment reach and causing a water quality problem
❑D Odor (not including natural sulfide odors)
❑E Current published or collected data indicating degraded water quality in the assessment reach. Cite source in "Notes/Sketch"
section.
❑F Livestock with access to stream or intertidal zone
❑G Excessive algae in stream or intertidal zone
❑H Degraded marsh vegetation in the intertidal zone (removal, burning, regular mowing, destruction, etc)
❑I Other: (explain in "Notes/Sketch" section)
®J Little to no stressors
8. Recent Weather — watershed metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
For Size 1 or 2 streams, D1 drought or higher is considered a drought; for Size 3 or 4 streams, D2 drought or higher is considered a drought.
❑A Drought conditions and no rainfall or rainfall not exceeding 1 inch within the last 48 hours
❑B Drought conditions and rainfall exceeding 1 inch within the last 48 hours
®C No drought conditions
9. Large or Dangerous Stream — assessment reach metric
❑Yes ®No Is stream is too large or dangerous to assess? If Yes, skip to Metric 13 (Streamside Area Ground Surface Condition).
10. Natural In -stream Habitat Types — assessment reach metric
10a. ❑Yes []No Degraded in -stream habitat over majority of the assessment reach (examples of stressors include excessive
sedimentation, mining, excavation, in -stream hardening [for example, rip -rap], recent dredging, and snagging)
(evaluate for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams only, then skip to Metric 12)
10b. Check
all that occur (occurs if > 5% coverage of assessment reach)
(skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams)
❑A
Multiple aquatic macrophytes and aquatic mosses
a W
❑F 5% oysters or other natural hard bottoms
(include liverworts, lichens, and algal mats)
:2 W
❑G Submerged aquatic vegetation
®B
Multiple sticks and/or leaf packs and/or emergent
w
❑H Low -tide refugia (pools)
vegetation
76 H
01 Sand bottom
❑C
Multiple snags and logs (including lap trees)
t „
❑J 5% vertical bank along the marsh
❑D
5% undercut banks and/or root mats and/or roots
L) 2
❑K Little or no habitat
in banks extend to the normal wetted perimeter
❑E
Little or no habitat
********* **"**"*********'"'******REMAINING
QUESTIONS ARE NOT APPLICABLE FOR TIDAL MARSH STREAMS**** * ****
11. Bedform and Substrate —assessment reach metric (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
1 la. ❑Yes ®No Is assessment reach in a natural sand -bed stream? (skip for Coastal Plain streams)
11 b. Bedform evaluated. Check the appropriate box(es).
®A Riffle -run section (evaluate 11c)
❑B Pool -glide section (evaluate 11d)
❑C Natural bedform absent (skip to Metric 12, Aquatic Life)
11 c. In riffle sections, check all that occur below the normal wetted perimeter of the assessment reach — whether or not submerged. Check
at least one box in each row (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams). Not Present (NP) = absent, Rare
(R) = present but < 10%, Common (C) _ > 10-40%, Abundant (A) _ > 40-70%, Predominant (P) _ > 70%. Cumulative percentages
should not exceed 100% for each assessment reach.
NP R C A P
® ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Bedrock/saprolite
® ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Boulder (256 — 4096 mm)
❑ ® ❑ ❑ ❑ Cobble (64 — 256 mm)
❑ ❑ ® ❑ ❑ Gravel (2 — 64 mm)
❑ ❑ ❑ ® ❑ Sand (.062 — 2 mm)
❑ ® ❑ ❑ ❑ Silt/clay (< 0.062 mm)
❑ ® ❑ ❑ ❑ Detritus
® ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Artificial (rip -rap, concrete, etc.)
11d. ❑Yes [:]No Are pools filled with sediment? (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)

12. Aquatic Life — assessment reach metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
12a. ®Yes [:]No Was an in -stream aquatic life assessment performed as described in the User Manual?
If No, select one of the following reasons and skip to Metric 13. ❑No Water ❑Other:
12b. ®Yes ❑No Are aquatic organisms present in the assessment reach (look in riffles, pools, then snags)? If Yes, check all that
apply. If No, skip to Metric 13.
1 >1 Numbers over columns refer to "individuals" for Size 1 and 2 streams and "taxa" for Size 3 and 4 streams.
® ❑Adult frogs
❑ ❑Aquatic reptiles
❑ []Aquatic macrophytes and aquatic mosses (include liverworts, lichens, and algal mats)
® ❑Beetles
❑ ❑Caddisfly larvae (T)
❑ ❑Asian clam (Corbicula)
❑ ®Crustacean (isopod/amphipod/crayfish/shrimp)
❑ ❑Damselfly and dragonfly larvae
❑ ❑Dipterans
® ❑Mayfly larvae (E)
❑ ❑Megaloptera (alderfly, fishfly, dobsonfly larvae)
❑ ❑Midges/mosquito larvae
❑ ❑Mosquito fish (Gambusia) or mud minnows (Umbra pygmaea)
❑ ❑Mussels/Clams (not Corbicula)
❑ ❑Other fish
® ❑Salamanders/tadpoles
❑ ❑Snails
❑ ❑Stonefly larvae (P)
❑ ❑Tipulid larvae
❑ ❑Worms/leeches
13. Streamside Area Ground Surface Condition — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams and B valley types)
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB). Consider storage capacity with regard to both overbank flow and upland runoff.
LB RB
®A ®A Little or no alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area
❑B ❑B Moderate alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area
❑C ❑C Severe alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area (examples: ditches, fill, soil compaction,
livestock disturbance, buildings, man-made levees, drainage pipes)
14. Streamside Area Water Storage — streamside area metric (skip for Size 1 streams, Tidal Marsh Streams, and B valley types)
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB) of the streamside area.
LB RB
❑A ❑A Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water z 6 inches deep
❑B ❑B Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water 3 to 6 inches deep
®C ®C Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water < 3 inches deep
15. Wetland Presence — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB). Do not consider wetlands outside of the streamside area or within the normal
wetted perimeter of assessment reach.
LB RB
❑Y ❑Y Are wetlands present in the streamside area?
ON ON
16. Baseflow Contributors — assessment reach metric (skip for Size 4 streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all contributors within the assessment reach or within view of and draining to the assessment reach.
❑A Streams and/or springs (jurisdictional discharges)
❑B Ponds (include wet detention basins; do not include sediment basins or dry detention basins)
❑C Obstruction passing flow during low -flow periods within the assessment area (beaver dam, leaky dam, bottom -release dam, weir)
❑D Evidence of bank seepage or sweating (iron in water indicates seepage)
®E Stream bed or bank soil reduced (dig through deposited sediment if present)
❑F None of the above
17. Baseflow Detractors — assessment area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all that apply.
❑A Evidence of substantial water withdrawals from the assessment reach (includes areas excavated for pump installation)
❑B Obstruction not passing flow during low -flow periods affecting the assessment reach (ex: watertight dam, sediment deposit)
❑C Urban stream (z 24% impervious surface for watershed)
❑D Evidence that the streamside area has been modified resulting in accelerated drainage into the assessment reach
❑E Assessment reach relocated to valley edge
®F None of the above
18. Shading — assessment reach metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider aspect. Consider "leaf -on" condition.
®A Stream shading is appropriate for stream category (may include gaps associated with natural processes)
❑B Degraded (example: scattered trees)
❑C Stream shading is gone or largely absent

19. Buffer Width — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider "vegetated buffer" and "wooded buffer" separately for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB) starting at the top of bank out
to the first break.
Vegetated Wooded
LB RB LB RB
®A ®A ❑A ®A >_ 100 feet wide or extends to the edge of the watershed
❑B ❑B ®e ❑B From 50 to < 100 feet wide
❑C ❑C ❑C ❑C From 30 to < 50 feet wide
❑D ❑D ❑D ❑D From 10 to < 30 feet wide
❑E ❑E ❑E ❑E < 10 feet wide or no trees
20. Buffer Structure — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB) for Metric 19 ("Vegetated" Buffer Width).
LB RB
❑A ®A Mature forest
®B ❑B Non -mature woody vegetation or modified vegetation structure
❑C ❑C Herbaceous vegetation with or without a strip of trees < 10 feet wide
❑D ❑D Maintained shrubs
❑E ❑E Little or no vegetation
21. Buffer Stressors — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all appropriate boxes for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB). Indicate if listed stressor abuts stream (Abuts), does not abut but is
within 30 feet of stream (< 30 feet), or is between 30 to 50 feet of stream (30-50 feet).
If none of the following stressors occurs on either bank, check here and skip to Metric 22: ED
Abuts < 30 feet 30-50 feet
LB RB LB RB LB RB
❑A ❑A ❑A ❑A ❑A ❑A Row crops
❑B ❑B ❑B ❑B ❑B ❑B Maintained turf
❑C ❑C ❑C ❑C ❑C ❑C Pasture (no livestock)/commercial horticulture
❑D ❑D ❑D ❑D ❑D ❑D Pasture (active livestock use)
22. Stem Density — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB) for Metric 19 ("Wooded" Buffer Width).
LB RB
❑A ❑A Medium to high stem density
®B ®B Low stem density
❑C ❑C No wooded riparian buffer or predominantly herbaceous species or bare ground
23. Continuity of Vegetated Buffer — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider whether vegetated buffer is continuous along stream (parallel). Breaks are areas lacking vegetation > 10 feet wide.
LB RB
®A ®A The total length of buffer breaks is < 25 percent.
❑B ❑B The total length of buffer breaks is between 25 and 50 percent.
❑C ❑C The total length of buffer breaks is > 50 percent.
24. Vegetative Composition — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Evaluate the dominant vegetation within 100 feet of each bank or to the edge of the watershed (whichever comes first) as it contributes to
assessment reach habitat.
LB RB
❑A ®A Vegetation is close to undisturbed in species present and their proportions. Lower strata composed of native species,
with non-native invasive species absent or sparse.
®B ❑B Vegetation indicates disturbance in terms of species diversity or proportions, but is still largely composed of native
species. This may include communities of weedy native species that develop after clear -cutting or clearing or
communities with non-native invasive species present, but not dominant, over a large portion of the expected strata or
communities missing understory but retaining canopy trees.
❑C ❑C Vegetation is severely disturbed in terms of species diversity or proportions. Mature canopy is absent or communities
with non-native invasive species dominant over a large portion of expected strata or communities composed of planted
stands of non -characteristic species or communities inappropriately composed of a single species or no vegetation.
25. Conductivity — assessment reach metric (skip for all Coastal Plain streams)
25a. [-]Yes ®No Was conductivity measurement recorded?
If No, select one of the following reasons. []No Water []Other:
25b. Check the box corresponding to the conductivity measurement (units of microsiemens per centimeter).
❑A < 46 ❑B 46 to < 67 ❑C 67 to < 79 ❑D 79 to < 230 ❑E >_ 230
Notes/Sketch:

Stream Site Name Belk Residential
Stream Category Pa2
Draft NC SAM Stream Rating Sheet
Accompanies User Manual Version 2.1
Date of Assessment 04/05/2021
Assessor Name/Organization Atlas Environmental
Notes of Field Assessment Form (Y/N) NO
Presence of regulatory considerations (Y/N) YES
Additional stream information/supplementary measurements included (Y/N) NO
NC SAM feature type (perennial, intermittent, Tidal Marsh Stream) Perennial
USACE/ NCDWR
Function Class Rating Summary
All Streams Intermittent
(1) Hydrology
MEDIUM
(2) Baseflow
HIGH
(2) Flood Flow
MEDIUM
(3) Streamside Area Attenuation
MEDIUM
(4) Floodplain Access
MEDIUM
(4) Wooded Riparian Buffer
MEDIUM
(4) Microtopography
LOW
(3) Stream Stability
MEDIUM
(4) Channel Stability
HIGH
(4) Sediment Transport
MEDIUM
(4) Stream Geomorphology
MEDIUM
(2) Stream/Intertidal Zone Interaction
NA
(2) Longitudinal Tidal Flow
NA
(2) Tidal Marsh Stream Stability
NA
(3) Tidal Marsh Channel Stability
NA
(3) Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology
NA
(1) Water Quality
HIGH
(2) Baseflow
HIGH
(2) Streamside Area Vegetation
HIGH
(3) Upland Pollutant Filtration
HIGH
(3) Thermoregulation
HIGH
(2) Indicators of Stressors
NO
(2) Aquatic Life Tolerance
MEDIUM
(2) Intertidal Zone Filtration
NA
(1) Habitat
LOW
(2) In -stream Habitat
LOW
(3) Baseflow
HIGH
(3) Substrate
MEDIUM
(3) Stream Stability
MEDIUM
(3) In -stream Habitat
LOW
(2) Stream -side Habitat
HIGH
(3) Stream -side Habitat
HIGH
(3) Thermoregulation
HIGH
(2) Tidal Marsh In -stream Habitat
NA
(3) Flow Restriction
NA
(3) Tidal Marsh Stream Stability
NA
(4) Tidal Marsh Channel Stability
NA
(4) Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology
NA
(3) Tidal Marsh In -stream Habitat
NA
(2) Intertidal Zone
NA
Overall
MEDIUM

NC SAM FIELD ASSESSMENT RESULTS
user manual version z.,j
USACE AID #: NCDWR #:
INSTRUCTIONS: Attach a sketch of the assessment area and photographs. Attach a copy of the USGS 7.5-minute topographic quadrangle,
and circle the location of the stream reach under evaluation. If multiple stream reaches will be evaluated on the same property, identify and
number all reaches on the attached map, and include a separate form for each reach. See the NC SAM User Manual for detailed descriptions
and explanations of requested information. Record in the "Notes/Sketch" section if supplementary measurements were performed. See the
NC SAM User Manual for examples of additional measurements that may be relevant.
NOTE EVIDENCE OF STRESSORS AFFECTING THE ASSESSMENT AREA (do not need to be within the assessment area).
PROJECT/SITE INFORMATION:
1. Project name (if any): Belk Residential 2. Date of evaluation: 04/05/2021
3. Applicant/owner name: Caballero Holdings, LLC 4. Assessor name/organization: Atlas Environmental
5. County: Iredell 6. Nearest named water body
7. River basin: Catawba on USGS 7.5-minute quad: Cornelius Creek
8. Site coordinates (decimal degrees, at lower end of assessment reach): 35.62936,-80.83516
STREAM INFORMATION: (depth and width can be approximations)
9. Site number (show on attached map): S3 10. Length of assessment reach evaluated (feet): 100
11. Channel depth from bed (in riffle, if present) to top of bank (feet): 1.5 ❑Unable to assess channel depth.
12. Channel width at top of bank (feet): 7 13. Is assessment reach a swamp steam? ❑Yes ❑No
14. Feature type: ®Perennial flow ❑Intermittent flow ❑Tidal Marsh Stream
STREAM CATEGORY INFORMATION:
15. NC SAM Zone: ❑ Mountains (M) ® Piedmont (P) ❑ Inner Coastal Plain (1) ❑ Outer Coastal Plain (0)
16. Estimated geomorphic ®A ❑B
valley shape (skip for
Tidal Marsh Stream): (more sinuous stream, flatter valley slope) (less sinuous stream, steeper valley slope)
17. Watershed size: (skip ❑Size 1 (< 0.1 mi2) ®Size 2 (0.1 to < 0.5 mil) ❑Size 3 (0.5 to < 5 miz) []Size 4 (2 5 mi2)
for Tidal Marsh Stream)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION:
18. Were regulatory considerations evaluated? ®Yes ❑No If Yes, check all that apply to the assessment area.
El Section 10 water ❑Classified Trout Waters ®Water Supply Watershed (❑I ❑II ❑III ®IV ❑V)
❑Essential Fish Habitat ❑Primary Nursery Area ❑ High Quality Waters/Outstanding Resource Waters
❑Publicly owned property ❑NCDWR Riparian buffer rule in effect ❑Nutrient Sensitive Waters
❑Anadromous fish ❑303(d) List ❑CAMA Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)
❑Documented presence of a federal and/or state listed protected species within the assessment area.
List species:
El Designated Critical Habitat (list species)
19. Are additional stream information/supplementary measurements included in "Notes/Sketch" section or attached? [:]Yes ®No
1. Channel Water- assessment reach metric (skip for Size 1 streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
®A Water throughout assessment reach.
❑B No flow, water in pools only.
❑C No water in assessment reach.
2. Evidence of Flow Restriction - assessment reach metric
❑A At least 10% of assessment reach in -stream habitat or riffle -pool sequence is severely affected by a flow restriction or fill to the
point of obstructing flow or a channel choked with aquatic macrophytes or ponded water or impoundment on flood or ebb within
the assessment reach (examples: undersized or perched culverts, causeways that constrict the channel, tidal gates, debris jams,
beaver dams).
®B Not
3. Feature Pattern - assessment reach metric
❑A A majority of the assessment reach has altered pattern (examples: straightening, modification above or below culvert).
®B Not A
4. Feature Longitudinal Profile - assessment reach metric
®A Majority of assessment reach has a substantially altered stream profile (examples: channel down -cutting, existing damming, over
widening, active aggradation, dredging, and excavation where appropriate channel profile has not reformed from any of these
disturbances).
❑B Not
5. Signs of Active Instability - assessment reach metric
Consider only current instability, not past events from which the stream has currently recovered. Examples of instability include
active bank failure, active channel down -cutting (head -cut), active widening, and artificial hardening (such as concrete, gabion, rip -rap).
®A < 10% of channel unstable
❑B 10 to 25% of channel unstable
El > 25% of channel unstable

6. Streamside Area Interaction — streamside area metric
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB).
LB RB
®A ®A
Little or no evidence of conditions that adversely affect reference interaction
❑B ❑B
Moderate evidence of conditions (examples: berms, levees, down -cutting, aggradation, dredging) that adversely affect
reference interaction (examples: limited streamside area access, disruption of flood flows through streamside area, leaky
or intermittent bulkheads, causeways with floodplain constriction, minor ditching [including mosquito ditching])
❑C ❑C
Extensive evidence of conditions that adversely affect reference interaction (little to no floodplain/intertidal zone access
[examples: causeways with floodplain and channel constriction, bulkheads, retaining walls, fill, stream incision, disruption
of flood flows through streamside area] or too much floodplain/intertidal zone access [examples: impoundments, intensive
mosquito ditching]) or floodplain/intertidal zone unnaturally absent or assessment reach is a man-made feature on an
interstream divide
Water Quality Stressors — assessment reach/intertidal zone metric
Check all that apply.
❑A Discolored water in stream or intertidal zone (milky white, blue, unnatural water discoloration, oil sheen, stream foam)
❑B Excessive sedimentation (burying of stream features or intertidal zone)
El Noticeable evidence of pollutant discharges entering the assessment reach and causing a water quality problem
❑D Odor (not including natural sulfide odors)
❑E Current published or collected data indicating degraded water quality in the assessment reach. Cite source in "Notes/Sketch"
section.
❑F Livestock with access to stream or intertidal zone
❑G Excessive algae in stream or intertidal zone
❑H Degraded marsh vegetation in the intertidal zone (removal, burning, regular mowing, destruction, etc)
❑I Other: (explain in "Notes/Sketch" section)
Si Little to no stressors
Recent Weather — watershed metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
For Size 1 or 2 streams, D1 drought or higher is considered a drought; for Size 3 or 4 streams, D2 drought or higher is considered a drought.
❑A Drought conditions and no rainfall or rainfall not exceeding 1 inch within the last 48 hours
❑B Drought conditions and rainfall exceeding 1 inch within the last 48 hours
®C No drought conditions
Large or Dangerous Stream — assessment reach metric
❑Yes ®No Is stream is too large or dangerous to assess? If Yes, skip to Metric 13 (Streamside Area Ground Surface Condition).
10. Natural In -stream Habitat Types —assessment reach metric
10a. ❑Yes
[]No Degraded in -stream habitat over majority
of the assessment reach (examples of stressors include excessive
sedimentation, mining, excavation, in -stream hardening [for example, rip -rap], recent dredging, and snagging)
(evaluate for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams only, then skip to Metric 12)
10b. Check all that occur (occurs if > 5% coverage of assessment
reach) (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams)
❑A
Multiple aquatic macrophytes and aquatic mosses
H ❑F 5% oysters or other natural hard bottoms
(include liverworts, lichens, and algal mats)
F ,E, ❑G Submerged aquatic vegetation
®B
Multiple sticks and/or leaf packs and/or emergent
w m ❑H Low -tide refugia (pools)
vegetation
t ❑I Sand bottom
❑C
Multiple snags and logs (including lap trees)
❑J 5% vertical bank along the marsh
®D
5% undercut banks and/or root mats and/or roots
02 ❑K Little or no habitat
in banks extend to the normal wetted perimeter
❑E
Little or no habitat
********'*"*`REMAINING QUESTIONS ARE NOT APPLICABLE FOR TIDAL MARSH STREAMS*************'**'*"*'** ****
11. Bedform and Substrate —assessment reach metric (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
11a. ❑Yes ®No Is assessment reach in a natural sand -bed stream? (skip for Coastal Plain streams)
11 b. Bedform evaluated. Check the appropriate box(es).
®A Riffle -run section (evaluate 11c)
❑B Pool -glide section (evaluate 11d)
❑C Natural bedform absent (skip to Metric 12, Aquatic Life)
11 c. In riffle sections, check all that occur below the normal wetted perimeter of the assessment reach — whether or not submerged. Check
at least one box in each row (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams). Not Present (NP) = absent, Rare
(R) = present but < 10%, Common (C) _ > 10-40%, Abundant (A) _ > 40-70%, Predominant (P) _ > 70%. Cumulative percentages
should not exceed 100% for each assessment reach.
NP R C A P
® ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Bedrock/saprolite
® ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Boulder (256 — 4096 mm)
❑ ® ❑ ❑ ❑ Cobble (64 — 256 mm)
❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ® Gravel (2 — 64 mm)
❑ ❑ ® ❑ ❑ Sand (.062 — 2 mm)
❑ ® ❑ ❑ ❑ Silt/clay (< 0.062 mm)
❑ ® ❑ ❑ ❑ Detritus
® ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Artificial (rip -rap, concrete, etc.)
11d. ❑Yes ❑No Are pools filled with sediment? (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)

12. Aquatic Life — assessment reach metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
12a. ®Yes [:]No Was an in -stream aquatic life assessment performed as described in the User Manual?
If No, select one of the following reasons and skip to Metric 13. ❑No Water ❑Other:
12b. ®Yes ❑No Are aquatic organisms present in the assessment reach (look in riffles, pools, then snags)? If Yes, check all that
apply. If No, skip to Metric 13.
1 >1 Numbers over columns refer to "individuals" for Size 1 and 2 streams and "taxa" for Size 3 and 4 streams.
® ❑Adult frogs
❑ ❑Aquatic reptiles
❑ ❑Aquatic macrophytes and aquatic mosses (include liverworts, lichens, and algal mats)
® ❑Beetles
® ❑Caddisfly larvae (T)
❑ ❑Asian clam (Corbicula)
❑ ®Crustacean (isopod/amphipod/crayfish/shrimp)
❑ ❑Damselfly and dragonfly larvae
❑ ❑Dipterans
❑ ®Mayfly larvae (E)
❑ ❑Megaloptera (alderfly, fishfly, dobsonfly larvae)
❑ ❑Midges/mosquito larvae
❑ ❑Mosquito fish (Gambusia) or mud minnows (Umbra pygmaea)
❑ ❑Mussels/Clams (not Corbicula)
❑ ❑Other fish
❑ ®Salamanders/tadpoles
❑ ❑Snails
® ❑Stonefly larvae (P)
❑ ❑Tipulid larvae
❑ ❑Worms/leeches
13. Streamside Area Ground Surface Condition — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams and B valley types)
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB). Consider storage capacity with regard to both overbank flow and upland runoff.
LB
RB
®A
®A
Little or no alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area
❑B
❑B
Moderate alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area
❑C
❑C
Severe alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area (examples: ditches, fill, soil compaction,
livestock disturbance, buildings, man-made levees, drainage pipes)
14. Streamside Area Water Storage — streamside area metric (skip for Size 1 streams, Tidal Marsh Streams, and B valley types)
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB) of the streamside area.
LB RB
❑A ❑A Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water z 6 inches deep
❑B ❑B Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water 3 to 6 inches deep
®C ®C Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water < 3 inches deep
15. Wetland Presence — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB). Do not consider wetlands outside of the streamside area or within the normal
wetted perimeter of assessment reach.
LB RB
❑Y ❑Y Are wetlands present in the streamside area?
ON ON
16. Baseflow Contributors — assessment reach metric (skip for Size 4 streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all contributors within the assessment reach or within view of and draining to the assessment reach.
❑A Streams and/or springs (jurisdictional discharges)
❑B Ponds (include wet detention basins; do not include sediment basins or dry detention basins)
❑C Obstruction passing flow during low -flow periods within the assessment area (beaver dam, leaky dam, bottom -release dam, weir)
®D Evidence of bank seepage or sweating (iron in water indicates seepage)
®E Stream bed or bank soil reduced (dig through deposited sediment if present)
OF None of the above
17. Baseflow Detractors — assessment area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all that apply.
❑A Evidence of substantial water withdrawals from the assessment reach (includes areas excavated for pump installation)
❑B Obstruction not passing flow during low -flow periods affecting the assessment reach (ex: watertight dam, sediment deposit)
❑C Urban stream (z 24% impervious surface for watershed)
❑D Evidence that the streamside area has been modified resulting in accelerated drainage into the assessment reach
❑E Assessment reach relocated to valley edge
OF None of the above
18. Shading — assessment reach metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider aspect. Consider "leaf -on" condition.
®A Stream shading is appropriate for stream category (may include gaps associated with natural processes)
❑B Degraded (example: scattered trees)
❑C Stream shading is gone or largely absent

19. Buffer Width — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider "vegetated buffer" and "wooded buffer" separately for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB) starting at the top of bank out
to the first break.
Vegetated
Wooded
LB RB
LB
RB
®A ®A
❑A
®A
>_ 100 feet wide or extends to the edge of the watershed
❑B ❑B
®B
❑B
From 50 to < 100 feet wide
❑C ❑C
❑C
❑C
From 30 to < 50 feet wide
❑D ❑D
❑D
❑D
From 10 to < 30 feet wide
❑E ❑E
❑E
❑E
< 10 feet wide or no trees
20. Buffer Structure — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB) for Metric 19 ("Vegetated" Buffer Width).
LB RB
®A ®A Mature forest
❑B ❑B Non -mature woody vegetation or modified vegetation structure
❑C ❑C Herbaceous vegetation with or without a strip of trees < 10 feet wide
❑D ❑D Maintained shrubs
❑E ❑E Little or no vegetation
21. Buffer Stressors — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all appropriate boxes for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB). Indicate if listed stressor abuts stream (Abuts), does not abut but is
within 30 feet of stream (< 30 feet , or is between 30 to 50 feet of stream 30-50 feet)
Abuts < 30 feet 30-50 feet
LB RB LB RB LB RB
❑A ❑A ❑A ❑A ❑A ❑A Row crops
❑B ❑B ❑B ❑B ❑B ❑B Maintained turf
❑C ❑C ❑C ❑C ❑C ❑C Pasture (no livestock)/commercial horticulture
❑D ❑D ❑D ❑D ❑D ❑D Pasture (active livestock use)
22. Stem Density — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB) for Metric 19 ("Wooded" Buffer Width).
LB RB
®A ®A Medium to high stem density
❑B ❑B Low stem density
❑C ❑C No wooded riparian buffer or predominantly herbaceous species or bare ground
23. Continuity of Vegetated Buffer — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider whether vegetated buffer is continuous along stream (parallel). Breaks are areas lacking vegetation > 10 feet wide.
LB RB
®A ®A The total length of buffer breaks is < 25 percent.
❑B ❑B The total length of buffer breaks is between 25 and 50 percent.
❑C ❑C The total length of buffer breaks is > 50 percent.
24. Vegetative Composition — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Evaluate the dominant vegetation within 100 feet of each bank or to the edge of the watershed (whichever comes first) as it contributes to
assessment reach habitat.
LB RB
®A ®A Vegetation is close to undisturbed in species present and their proportions. Lower strata composed of native species,
with non-native invasive species absent or sparse.
❑B ❑B Vegetation indicates disturbance in terms of species diversity or proportions, but is still largely composed of native
species. This may include communities of weedy native species that develop after clear -cutting or clearing or
communities with non-native invasive species present, but not dominant, over a large portion of the expected strata or
communities missing understory but retaining canopy trees.
❑C ❑C Vegetation is severely disturbed in terms of species diversity or proportions. Mature canopy is absent or communities
with non-native invasive species dominant over a large portion of expected strata or communities composed of planted
stands of non -characteristic species or communities inappropriately composed of a single species or no vegetation.
25. Conductivity — assessment reach metric (skip for all Coastal Plain streams)
25a. ❑Yes ®No Was conductivity measurement recorded?
If No, select one of the following reasons. ❑No Water ❑Other:
25b. Check the box corresponding to the conductivity measurement (units of microsiemens per centimeter).
❑A < 46 ❑B 46 to < 67 ❑C 67 to < 79 ❑D 79 to < 230 ❑E z 230
Notes/Sketch:

Stream Site Name Belk Residential
Stream Category Pa2
Draft NC SAM Stream Rating Sheet
Accompanies User Manual Version 2.1
Date of Assessment 04/05/2021
Assessor Name/Organization Atlas Environmental
Notes of Field Assessment Form (Y/N) NO
Presence of regulatory considerations (Y/N) YES
Additional stream information/supplementary measurements included (Y/N) NO
NC SAM feature type (perennial, intermittent, Tidal Marsh Stream) Perennial
USACE/ NCDWR
Function Class Rating Summary
All Streams Intermittent
(1) Hydrology
HIGH
(2) Baseflow
HIGH
(2) Flood Flow
HIGH
(3) Streamside Area Attenuation
HIGH
(4) Floodplain Access
HIGH
(4) Wooded Riparian Buffer
HIGH
(4) Microtopography
LOW
(3) Stream Stability
HIGH
(4) Channel Stability
HIGH
(4) Sediment Transport
HIGH
(4) Stream Geomorphology
MEDIUM
(2) Stream/Intertidal Zone Interaction
NA
(2) Longitudinal Tidal Flow
NA
(2) Tidal Marsh Stream Stability
NA
(3) Tidal Marsh Channel Stability
NA
(3) Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology
NA
(1) Water Quality
HIGH
(2) Baseflow
HIGH
(2) Streamside Area Vegetation
HIGH
(3) Upland Pollutant Filtration
HIGH
(3) Thermoregulation
HIGH
(2) Indicators of Stressors
NO
(2) Aquatic Life Tolerance
HIGH
(2) Intertidal Zone Filtration
NA
(1) Habitat
HIGH
(2) In -stream Habitat
MEDIUM
(3) Baseflow
HIGH
(3) Substrate
MEDIUM
(3) Stream Stability
MEDIUM
(3) In -stream Habitat
MEDIUM
(2) Stream -side Habitat
HIGH
(3) Stream -side Habitat
HIGH
(3) Thermoregulation
HIGH
(2) Tidal Marsh In -stream Habitat
NA
(3) Flow Restriction
NA nj
(3) Tidal Marsh Stream Stability
NA
(4) Tidal Marsh Channel Stability
NA
(4) Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology
NA
(3) Tidal Marsh In -stream Habitat
NA
(2) Intertidal Zone
NA
Overall
HIGH

NC SAM FIELD ASSESSMENT RESULTS
user manual version c.i
USACE AID #: NCDWR #:
INSTRUCTIONS: Attach a sketch of the assessment area and photographs. Attach a copy of the USGS 7.5-minute topographic quadrangle,
and circle the location of the stream reach under evaluation. If multiple stream reaches will be evaluated on the same property, identify and
number all reaches on the attached map, and include a separate form for each reach. See the NC SAM User Manual for detailed descriptions
and explanations of requested information. Record in the "Notes/Sketch" section if supplementary measurements were performed. See the
NC SAM User Manual for examples of additional measurements that may be relevant.
NOTE EVIDENCE OF STRESSORS AFFECTING THE ASSESSMENT AREA (do not need to be within the assessment area).
PROJECT/SITE INFORMATION:
1. Project name (if any): Belk Residential 2. Date of evaluation: 04/05/2021
3. Applicant/owner name: Caballero Holdings, LLC 4. Assessor name/organization: Atlas Environmental
5. County: Iredell 6. Nearest named water body
7. River basin: Catawba on USGS 7.5-minute quad: Cornelius Creek
8. Site coordinates (decimal degrees, at lower end of assessment reach): 35.63088,-80.83229
STREAM INFORMATION: (depth and width can be approximations)
9. Site number (show on attached map): S4 10. Length of assessment reach evaluated (feet): 100
11. Channel depth from bed (in riffle, if present) to top of bank (feet): 1 ❑Unable to assess channel depth.
12. Channel width at top of bank (feet): 5 13. Is assessment reach a swamp steam? ❑Yes ❑No
14. Feature type: ®Perennial flow []Intermittent flow ❑Tidal Marsh Stream
STREAM CATEGORY INFORMATION:
15. NC SAM Zone: ❑ Mountains (M) ® Piedmont (P) ❑ Inner Coastal Plain (1) ❑ Outer Coastal Plain (0)
16. Estimated geomorphic ❑A ���_� ®B
valley shape (skip for
Tidal Marsh Stream): (more sinuous stream, flatter valley slope) (less sinuous stream, steeper valley slope)
17. Watershed size: (skip ❑Size 1 (< 0.1 mil) ®Size 2 (0.1 to < 0.5 mi2) ❑Size 3 (0.5 to < 5 mil) ❑Size 4 (t 5 mi2)
for Tidal Marsh Stream)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION:
18. Were regulatory considerations evaluated? ®Yes []No If Yes, check all that apply to the assessment area.
❑Section 10 water ❑Classified Trout Waters ®Water Supply Watershed (❑I ❑II ❑III ®IV ❑V)
❑Essential Fish Habitat ❑Primary Nursery Area ❑ High Quality Waters/Outstanding Resource Waters
❑Publicly owned property ❑NCDWR Riparian buffer rule in effect ❑Nutrient Sensitive Waters
❑Anadromous fish ❑303(d) List ❑CAMA Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)
❑Documented presence of a federal and/or state listed protected species within the assessment area.
List species:
[I Designated Critical Habitat (list species)
19. Are additional stream information/supplementary measurements included in "Notes/Sketch" section or attached? ❑Yes ®No
1. Channel Water— assessment reach metric (skip for Size 1 streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
®A Water throughout assessment reach.
❑B No flow, water in pools only.
❑C No water in assessment reach.
2. Evidence of Flow Restriction — assessment reach metric
❑A At least 10% of assessment reach in -stream habitat or riffle -pool sequence is severely affected by a flow restriction or fill to the
point of obstructing flow or a channel choked with aquatic macrophytes or ponded water or impoundment on flood or ebb within
the assessment reach (examples: undersized or perched culverts, causeways that constrict the channel, tidal gates, debris jams,
beaver dams).
®B Not A
3. Feature Pattern — assessment reach metric
®A A majority of the assessment reach has altered pattern (examples: straightening, modification above or below culvert).
❑B Not A
4. Feature Longitudinal Profile — assessment reach metric
®A Majority of assessment reach has a substantially altered stream profile (examples: channel down -cutting, existing damming, over
widening, active aggradation, dredging, and excavation where appropriate channel profile has not reformed from any of these
disturbances).
❑B Not A
5. Signs of Active Instability — assessment reach metric
Consider only current instability, not past events from which the stream has currently recovered. Examples of instability include
active bank failure, active channel down -cutting (head -cut), active widening, and artificial hardening (such as concrete, gabion, rip -rap).
❑A < 10% of channel unstable
®B 10 to 25% of channel unstable
❑C > 25% of channel unstable

6. Streamside Area Interaction — streamside area metric
Consider for the
LB RB
❑A ❑A
®B ®B
❑C ❑C
Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB).
Little or no evidence of conditions that adversely affect reference interaction
Moderate evidence of conditions (examples: berms, levees, down -cutting, aggradation, dredging) that adversely affect
reference interaction (examples: limited streamside area access, disruption of flood flows through streamside area, leaky
or intermittent bulkheads, causeways with floodplain constriction, minor ditching [including mosquito ditching])
Extensive evidence of conditions that adversely affect reference interaction (little to no floodplain/intertidal zone access
[examples: causeways with floodplain and channel constriction, bulkheads, retaining walls, fill, stream incision, disruption
of flood flows through streamside area] or too much floodplain/intertidal zone access [examples: impoundments, intensive
mosquito ditching]) or floodplain/intertidal zone unnaturally absent or assessment reach is a man-made feature on an
interstream divide
Water Quality Stressors — assessment reach/intertidal zone metric
Check all that apply.
❑A Discolored water in stream or intertidal zone (milky white, blue, unnatural water discoloration, oil sheen, stream foam)
❑B Excessive sedimentation (burying of stream features or intertidal zone)
El Noticeable evidence of pollutant discharges entering the assessment reach and causing a water quality problem
❑D Odor (not including natural sulfide odors)
❑E Current published or collected data indicating degraded water quality in the assessment reach. Cite source in "Notes/Sketch"
section.
❑F Livestock with access to stream or intertidal zone
❑G Excessive algae in stream or intertidal zone
❑H Degraded marsh vegetation in the intertidal zone (removal, burning, regular mowing, destruction, etc)
❑I Other: (explain in "Notes/Sketch" section)
®J Little to no stressors
8. Recent Weather — watershed metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
For Size 1 or 2 streams, D1 drought or higher is considered a drought; for Size 3 or 4 streams, D2 drought or higher is considered a drought.
❑A Drought conditions and no rainfall or rainfall not exceeding 1 inch within the last 48 hours
❑B Drought conditions and rainfall exceeding 1 inch within the last 48 hours
®C No drought conditions
9. Large or Dangerous Stream — assessment reach metric
[]Yes ®No Is stream is too large or dangerous to assess? If Yes, skip to Metric 13 (Streamside Area Ground Surface Condition).
10. Natural In -stream Habitat Types — assessment reach metric
10a. ❑Yes ❑No Degraded in -stream habitat over majority of the assessment reach (examples of stressors include excessive
sedimentation, mining, excavation, in -stream hardening [for example, rip -rap], recent dredging, and snagging)
(evaluate for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams only, then skip to Metric 12)
10b. Check
all that occur (occurs if > 5% coverage of assessment reach)
(skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams)
❑A
Multiple aquatic macrophytes and aquatic mosses
N
❑F 5% oysters or other natural hard bottoms
(include liverworts, lichens, and algal mats)
m
❑G Submerged aquatic vegetation
®B
Multiple sticks and/or leaf packs and/or emergent
w 9
❑H Low -tide refugia (pools)
vegetation
HC
❑I Sand bottom
❑
Multiple snags and logs (including lap trees)
r 10
❑J 5% vertical bank along the marsh
❑D
5% undercut banks and/or root mats and/or roots
02
❑K Little or no habitat
in banks extend to the normal wetted perimeter
❑E
Little or no habitat
*"*********
*" "REMAINING QUESTIONS ARE NOT APPLICABLE FOR TIDAL MARSH STREAMS*"'*'*'****"*"'*"* "•""""""
11. Bedform and Substrate —assessment reach metric (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
1 la. ❑Yes ®No Is assessment reach in a natural sand -bed stream? (skip for Coastal Plain streams)
11 b. Bedform evaluated. Check the appropriate box(es).
®A Riffle -run section (evaluate 11c)
❑B Pool -glide section (evaluate 11d)
❑C Natural bedform absent (skip to Metric 12, Aquatic Life)
11 c. In riffle sections, check all that occur below the normal wetted perimeter of the assessment reach — whether or not submerged. Check
at least one box in each row (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams). Not Present (NP) = absent, Rare
(R) = present but < 10%, Common (C) _ > 10-40%, Abundant (A) _ > 40-70%, Predominant (P) _ > 70%. Cumulative percentages
should not exceed 100% for each assessment reach.
NP R C A P
® ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Bedrock/saprolite
® ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Boulder (256 — 4096 mm)
❑ ® ❑ ❑ ❑ Cobble (64 — 256 mm)
❑ ❑ ® ❑ ❑ Gravel (2 — 64 mm)
❑ ❑ ® ❑ ❑ Sand (.062 — 2 mm)
❑ ® ❑ ❑ ❑ Silt/clay (< 0.062 mm)
❑ ® ❑ ❑ ❑ Detritus
® ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Artificial (rip -rap, concrete, etc.)
11d. ❑Yes ❑No Are pools filled with sediment? (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)

12. Aquatic Life — assessment reach metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
12a. ®Yes ❑No Was an in -stream aquatic life assessment performed as described
If No, select one of the following reasons and skip to Metric 13. ❑No Water ❑Other:
in the User Manual?
12b. ®Yes ❑No Are aquatic organisms present in the assessment reach (look in riffles, pools, then snags)? If Yes, check all that
apply. If No, skip to Metric 13.
>1 Numbers over columns refer to "individuals" for Size 1 and 2 streams and "taxa" for Size 3 and 4 streams.
❑Adult frogs
❑Aquatic reptiles
❑Aquatic macrophytes and aquatic mosses (include liverworts,
❑Beetles
❑Caddisfly larvae (T)
❑Asian clam (Corbicula)
❑Crustacean (isopod/amphipod/crayfish/shrimp)
❑Damselfly and dragonfly larvae
❑Dipterans
❑Mayfly larvae (E)
❑Megaloptera (alderfly, fishfly, dobsonfly larvae)
❑Midges/mosquito larvae
El Mosquito fish (Gambusia) or mud minnows (Umbra pygmaea)
❑Mussels/Clams (not Corbicula)
❑Other fish
❑Sala manders/tad poles
❑Snails
❑Stonefly larvae (P)
❑Tipulid larvae
❑Worms/leeches
lichens, and algal mats)
13. Streamside Area Ground Surface Condition — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams and B valley types)
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB). Consider storage capacity with regard to both overbank flow and upland runoff.
LB RB
❑A ❑A Little or no alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area
®B ®B Moderate alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area
El ❑C Severe alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area (examples: ditches, fill, soil compaction,
livestock disturbance, buildings, man-made levees, drainage pipes)
14. Streamside Area Water Storage — streamside area metric (skip for Size 1 streams, Tidal Marsh Streams, and B valley types)
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB) of the streamside area.
LB RB
❑A ❑A Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water z 6 inches deep
❑B ❑B Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water 3 to 6 inches deep
®C ®C Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water < 3 inches deep
15. Wetland Presence — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB). Do not consider wetlands outside of the streamside area or within the normal
wetted perimeter of assessment reach.
LB RB
❑Y ❑Y Are wetlands present in the streamside area?
®N ®N
16. Baseflow Contributors — assessment reach metric (skip for Size 4 streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all contributors within the assessment reach or within view of and draining to the assessment reach.
❑A Streams and/or springs (jurisdictional discharges)
❑B Ponds (include wet detention basins; do not include sediment basins or dry detention basins)
❑C Obstruction passing flow during low -flow periods within the assessment area (beaver dam, leaky dam, bottom -release dam, weir)
®D Evidence of bank seepage or sweating (iron in water indicates seepage)
®E Stream bed or bank soil reduced (dig through deposited sediment if present)
❑F None of the above
17. Baseflow Detractors — assessment area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all that apply.
❑A Evidence of substantial water withdrawals from the assessment reach (includes areas excavated for pump installation)
❑B Obstruction not passing flow during low -flow periods affecting the assessment reach (ex: watertight dam, sediment deposit)
❑C Urban stream (>_ 24% impervious surface for watershed)
❑D Evidence that the streamside area has been modified resulting in accelerated drainage into the assessment reach
El Assessment reach relocated to valley edge
OF None of the above
18. Shading — assessment reach metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider aspect. Consider "leaf -on" condition.
®A Stream shading is appropriate for stream category (may include gaps associated with natural processes)
❑B Degraded (example: scattered trees)
❑C Stream shading is gone or largely absent

19. Buffer Width — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider "vegetated buffer" and "wooded buffer" separately for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB) starting at the top of bank out
to the first break.
Vegetated Wooded
LB RB LB RB
®A ®A ®A ®A >_ 100 feet wide or extends to the edge of the watershed
❑B ❑B ❑B ❑B From 50 to < 100 feet wide
❑C ❑C ❑C ❑C From 30 to < 50 feet wide
❑D ❑D ❑D ❑D From 10 to < 30 feet wide
❑E ❑E ❑E ❑E < 10 feet wide or no trees
20. Buffer Structure — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB) for Metric 19 ("Vegetated" Buffer Width).
LB RB
®A ®A Mature forest
❑B ❑B Non -mature woody vegetation or modified vegetation structure
❑C ❑C Herbaceous vegetation with or without a strip of trees < 10 feet wide
❑D ❑D Maintained shrubs
❑E ❑E Little or no vegetation
21. Buffer Stressors — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all appropriate boxes for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB). Indicate if listed stressor abuts stream (Abuts), does not abut but is
within 30 feet of stream (< 30 feet), or is between 30 to 50 feet of stream (30-50 feet).
If none of the`following stressors occurs on either bank, check here and skip to Metric 22:
Abuts < 30 feet 30-50 feet
LB RB LB RB LB RB
❑A ❑A ❑A ❑A ❑A ❑A Row crops
❑B ❑B ❑B ❑B ❑B ❑B Maintained turf
❑C ❑C ❑C ❑C ❑C ❑C Pasture (no livestock)/commercial horticulture
❑D ❑D ❑D ❑D ❑D ❑D Pasture (active livestock use)
22. Stem Density — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB) for Metric 19 ("Wooded" Buffer Width).
LB RB
❑A ❑A Medium to high stem density
®B ®B Low stem density
❑C ❑C No wooded riparian buffer or predominantly herbaceous species or bare ground
23. Continuity of Vegetated Buffer — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider whether vegetated buffer is continuous along stream (parallel). Breaks are areas lacking vegetation > 10 feet wide.
LB RB
®A ®A The total length of buffer breaks is < 25 percent.
❑B ❑B The total length of buffer breaks is between 25 and 50 percent.
❑C ❑C The total length of buffer breaks is > 50 percent.
24. Vegetative Composition — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Evaluate the dominant vegetation within 100 feet of each bank or to the edge of the watershed (whichever comes first) as it contributes to
assessment reach habitat.
LB RB
®A ®A Vegetation is close to undisturbed in species present and their proportions. Lower strata composed of native species,
with non-native invasive species absent or sparse.
❑B El Vegetation indicates disturbance in terms of species diversity or proportions, but is still largely composed of native
species. This may include communities of weedy native species that develop after clear -cutting or clearing or
communities with non-native invasive species present, but not dominant, over a large portion of the expected strata or
communities missing understory but retaining canopy trees.
El El Vegetation is severely disturbed in terms of species diversity or proportions. Mature canopy is absent or communities
with non-native invasive species dominant over a large portion of expected strata or communities composed of planted
stands of non -characteristic species or communities inappropriately composed of a single species or no vegetation.
25. Conductivity — assessment reach metric (skip for all Coastal Plain streams)
25a. ❑Yes ®No Was conductivity measurement recorded?
If No, select one of the following reasons. ❑No Water [—]Other:
25b. Check the box corresponding to the conductivity measurement (units of microsiemens per centimeter).
❑A < 46 ❑B 46 to < 67 ❑C 67 to < 79 ❑D 79 to < 230 ❑E > 230
Notes/Sketch:

Stream Site Name Belk Residential
Stream Category Pb2
Draft NC SAM Stream Rating Sheet
Accompanies User Manual Version 2.1
Date of Assessment 04/05/2021
Assessor Name/Organization Atlas Environmental
Notes of Field Assessment Form (Y/N) NO
Presence of regulatory considerations (Y/N) YES
Additional stream information/supplementary measurements included (Y/N) NO
NC SAM feature type (perennial, intermittent, Tidal Marsh Stream) Perennial
USACE/ NCDWR
Function Class Rating Summary
All Streams Intermittent
(1) Hydrology
MEDIUM
(2) Baseflow
MEDIUM
(2) Flood Flow
MEDIUM
(3) Streamside Area Attenuation
MEDIUM
(4) Floodplain Access
MEDIUM
(4) Wooded Riparian Buffer
MEDIUM
(4) Microtopography
NA
(3) Stream Stability
MEDIUM
(4) Channel Stability
MEDIUM
(4) Sediment Transport
HIGH
(4) Stream Geomorphology
LOW
(2) Stream/Intertidal Zone Interaction
NA
(2) Longitudinal Tidal Flow
NA
(2) Tidal Marsh Stream Stability
NA
(3) Tidal Marsh Channel Stability
NA
(3) Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology
NA
(1) Water Quality
MEDIUM
(2) Baseflow
MEDIUM
(2) Streamside Area Vegetation
HIGH
(3) Upland Pollutant Filtration
HIGH
(3) Thermoregulation
HIGH
(2) Indicators of Stressors
NO
(2) Aquatic Life Tolerance
MEDIUM
(2) Intertidal Zone Filtration
NA
(1) Habitat
HIGH
(2) In -stream Habitat
HIGH
(3) Baseflow
MEDIUM
(3) Substrate
HIGH
(3) Stream Stability
MEDIUM
(3) In -stream Habitat
HIGH
(2) Stream -side Habitat
HIGH
(3) Stream -side Habitat
HIGH
(3) Thermoregulation
HIGH
(2) Tidal Marsh In -stream Habitat
NA
(3) Flow Restriction
NA
(3) Tidal Marsh Stream Stability
NA
(4) Tidal Marsh Channel Stability
NA
(4) Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology
NA
(3) Tidal Marsh In -stream Habitat
NA
(2) Intertidal Zone
NA
Overall
MEDIUM

NC SAM FIELD ASSESSMENT RESULTS
user manual version z.-i
USACE AID #: NCDWR #:
INSTRUCTIONS: Attach a sketch of the assessment area and photographs. Attach a copy of the USGS 7.5-minute topographic quadrangle,
and circle the location of the stream reach under evaluation. If multiple stream reaches will be evaluated on the same property, identify and
number all reaches on the attached map, and include a separate form for each reach. See the NC SAM User Manual for detailed descriptions
and explanations of requested information. Record in the "Notes/Sketch" section if supplementary measurements were performed. See the
NC SAM User Manual for examples of additional measurements that may be relevant.
NOTE EVIDENCE OF STRESSORS AFFECTING THE ASSESSMENT AREA (do not need to be within the assessment area).
PROJECT/SITE INFORMATION:
1. Project name (if any): Belk Residential 2. Date of evaluation: 04/05/2021
3. Applicant/owner name: Caballero Holdings, LLC 4. Assessor name/organization: Atlas Environmental
5. County: Iredell 6. Nearest named water body
7. River basin: Catawba on USGS 7.5-minute quad: Cornelius Creek
8. Site coordinates (decimal degrees, at lower end of assessment reach): 35.62658,-80.83283
STREAM INFORMATION: (depth and width can be approximations)
9. Site number (show on attached map): S5 10. Length of assessment reach evaluated (feet): 100
11. Channel depth from bed (in riffle, if present) to top of bank (feet): 1.5 ❑Unable to assess channel depth.
12. Channel width at top of bank (feet): 6 13. Is assessment reach a swamp steam? []Yes ❑No
14. Feature type: ®Perennial flow [Intermittent flow ❑Tidal Marsh Stream
STREAM CATEGORY INFORMATION:
15. NC SAM Zone: ❑ Mountains (M) ® Piedmont (P) ❑ Inner Coastal Plain (1) ❑ Outer Coastal Plain (0)
16. Estimated geomorphic ®A` El
valley shape (skip for
Tidal Marsh Stream): (more sinuous stream, flatter valley slope) (less sinuous stream, steeper valley slope)
17. Watershed size: (skip ❑Size 1 (< 0.1 mi2) ®Size 2 (0.1 to < 0.5 mil) ❑Size 3 (0.5 to < 5 mi2) ❑Size 4 (Z 5 mi2)
for Tidal Marsh Stream)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION:
18. Were regulatory considerations evaluated? ®Yes ❑No If Yes, check all that apply to the assessment area.
❑Section 10 water ❑Classified Trout Waters ®Water Supply Watershed (❑I ❑II []III ®IV ❑V)
❑Essential Fish Habitat ❑Primary Nursery Area ❑ High Quality Waters/Outstanding Resource Waters
❑Publicly owned property ❑NCDWR Riparian buffer rule in effect []Nutrient Sensitive Waters
❑Anadromous fish ❑303(d) List ❑CAMA Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)
❑Documented presence of a federal and/or state listed protected species within the assessment area.
List species:
El Designated Critical Habitat (list species)
19. Are additional stream information/supplementary measurements included in "Notes/Sketch" section or attached? ❑Yes ®No
1. Channel Water- assessment reach metric (skip for Size 1 streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
®A Water throughout assessment reach.
❑B No flow, water in pools only.
❑C No water in assessment reach.
2. Evidence of Flow Restriction - assessment reach metric
❑A At least 10% of assessment reach in -stream habitat or riffle -pool sequence is severely affected by a flow restriction or fill to the
point of obstructing flow or a channel choked with aquatic macrophytes or ponded water or impoundment on flood or ebb within
the assessment reach (examples: undersized or perched culverts, causeways that constrict the channel, tidal gates, debris jams,
beaver dams).
®B Not A
3. Feature Pattern - assessment reach metric
❑A A majority of the assessment reach has altered pattern (examples: straightening, modification above or below culvert).
®B Not A
4. Feature Longitudinal Profile - assessment reach metric
®A Majority of assessment reach has a substantially altered stream profile (examples: channel down -cutting, existing damming, over
widening, active aggradation, dredging, and excavation where appropriate channel profile has not reformed from any of these
disturbances).
❑B Not
5. Signs of Active Instability - assessment reach metric
Consider only current instability, not past events from which the stream has currently recovered. Examples of instability include
active bank failure, active channel down -cutting (head -cut), active widening, and artificial hardening (such as concrete, gabion, rip -rap).
®A < 10% of channel unstable
❑B 10 to 25% of channel unstable
❑C > 25% of channel unstable

6. Streamside Area Interaction — streamside area metric
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB).
LB RB
❑A ®A Little or no evidence of conditions that adversely affect reference interaction
®B ❑B Moderate evidence of conditions (examples: berms, levees, down -cutting, aggradation, dredging) that adversely affect
reference interaction (examples: limited streamside area access, disruption of flood flows through streamside area, leaky
or intermittent bulkheads, causeways with floodplain constriction, minor ditching [including mosquito ditching])
❑C El Extensive evidence of conditions that adversely affect reference interaction (little to no flood plain/intertidal zone access
[examples: causeways with floodplain and channel constriction, bulkheads, retaining walls, fill, stream incision, disruption
of flood flows through streamside area] or too much floodplain/intertidal zone access [examples: impoundments, intensive
mosquito ditching]) or floodplain/intertidal zone unnaturally absent or assessment reach is a man-made feature on an
interstream divide
Water Quality Stressors — assessment reach/intertidal zone metric
Check all that apply.
❑A Discolored water in stream or intertidal zone (milky white, blue, unnatural water discoloration, oil sheen, stream foam)
❑B Excessive sedimentation (burying of stream features or intertidal zone)
❑C Noticeable evidence of pollutant discharges entering the assessment reach and causing a water quality problem
❑D Odor (not including natural sulfide odors)
❑E Current published or collected data indicating degraded water quality in the assessment reach. Cite source in "Notes/Sketch"
section.
❑F Livestock with access to stream or intertidal zone
❑G Excessive algae in stream or intertidal zone
❑H Degraded marsh vegetation in the intertidal zone (removal, burning, regular mowing, destruction, etc)
❑1 Other: (explain in "Notes/Sketch" section)
®J Little to no stressors
Recent Weather — watershed metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
For Size 1 or 2 streams, D1 drought or higher is considered a drought; for Size 3 or 4 streams, D2 drought or higher is considered a drought.
❑A Drought conditions and no rainfall or rainfall not exceeding 1 inch within the last 48 hours
❑B Drought conditions and rainfall exceeding 1 inch within the last 48 hours
®C No drought conditions
9. Large or Dangerous Stream — assessment reach metric
❑Yes ®No Is stream is too large or dangerous to assess? If Yes, skip to Metric 13 (Streamside Area Ground Surface Condition).
10. Natural In -stream Habitat Types —assessment reach metric
10a. []Yes [_-]No Degraded in -stream habitat over majority of the assessment reach (examples of stressors include excessive
sedimentation, mining, excavation, in -stream hardening [for example, rip -rap], recent dredging, and snagging)
(evaluate for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams only, then skip to Metric 12)
10b. Check all that occur (occurs if > 5% coverage of assessment reach
❑A
Multiple aquatic macrophytes and aquatic mosses
(include liverworts, lichens, and algal mats)
®B
Multiple sticks and/or leaf packs and/or emergent
P
vegetation
t
®C
Multiple snags and logs (including lap trees)
El
5% undercut banks and/or root mats and/or roots
in banks extend to the normal wetted perimeter
❑E Little or no habitat
(skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams)
❑F
5% oysters or other natural hard bottoms
❑G
Submerged aquatic vegetation
❑H
Low -tide refugia (pools)
❑I
Sand bottom
❑J
5% vertical bank along the marsh
❑K
Little or no habitat
*****************"*REMAINING QUESTIONS ARE NOT APPLICABLE FOR TIDAL MARSH STREAMS"**********************'***
11. Bedform and Substrate — assessment reach metric (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
11a. ❑Yes ®No is assessment reach in a natural sand -bed stream? (skip for Coastal Plain streams)
11 b. Bedform evaluated. Check the appropriate box(es).
®A Riffle -run section (evaluate 11c)
❑B Pool -glide section (evaluate 11d)
❑C Natural bedform absent (skip to Metric 12, Aquatic Life)
11 c. In riffle sections, check all that occur below the normal wetted perimeter of the assessment reach —whether or not submerged. Check
at least one box in each row (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams). Not Present (NP) = absent, Rare
(R) = present but < 10%, Common (C) _ > 10-40%, Abundant (A) _ > 40-70%, Predominant (P) _ > 70%. Cumulative percentages
should not exceed 100% for each assessment reach.
NP
R
C
A
P
®
❑
❑
❑
❑
Bedrock/saprolite
®
❑
❑
Cl
Cl
Boulder (256 — 4096 mm)
❑
®
❑
❑
❑
Cobble (64 — 256 mm)
Cl
❑
Cl
❑
®
Gravel (2 — 64 mm)
❑
❑
®
❑
❑
Sand (.062 — 2 mm)
❑
®
❑
❑
❑
Silt/clay (< 0.062 mm)
❑
®
❑
❑
❑
Detritus
®
❑
❑
❑
❑
Artificial (rip -rap, concrete, etc.)
11d. ❑Yes []No Are pools filled with sediment? (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)

12. Aquatic Life — assessment reach metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
12a. ®Yes ❑No Was an in -stream aquatic life assessment performed as described in the User Manual?
If No, select one of the following reasons and skip to Metric 13. ❑No Water ❑Other:
12b. ®Yes []No Are aquatic organisms present in the assessment reach (look in riffles, pools, then snags)? If Yes, check all that
apply. If No, skip to Metric 13.
1 >1 Numbers over columns refer to "individuals" for Size 1 and 2 streams and "taxa" for Size 3 and 4 streams.
® []Adult frogs
❑ []Aquatic reptiles
❑ []Aquatic macrophytes and aquatic mosses (include liverworts, lichens, and algal mats)
❑ ®Beetles
® ❑Caddisfly larvae (T)
❑ ❑Asian clam (Corbicula)
❑ ®Crustacean (isopod/amphipod/crayfish/shrimp)
❑ ❑Damselfly and dragonfly larvae
❑ ❑Dipterans
❑ ❑Mayfly larvae (E)
❑ ❑Megaloptera (alderfly, fishfly, dobsonfly larvae)
❑ ❑Midges/mosquito larvae
❑ ❑Mosquito fish (Gambusia) or mud minnows (Umbra pygmaea)
❑ ❑Mussels/Clams (not Corbicula)
® ❑Other fish
❑ ®Salamanders/tadpoles
® ❑Snails
❑ ❑Stonefly larvae (P)
❑ ❑Tipulid larvae
❑ ❑Worms/leeches
13. Streamside Area Ground Surface Condition — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams and B valley types)
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB). Consider storage capacity with regard to both overbank flow and upland runoff.
LB RB
®A ®A Little or no alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area
❑B ❑B Moderate alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area
❑C ❑C Severe alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area (examples: ditches, fill, soil compaction,
livestock disturbance, buildings, man-made levees, drainage pipes)
14. Streamside Area Water Storage — streamside area metric (skip for Size 1 streams, Tidal Marsh Streams, and B valley types)
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB) of the streamside area.
LB RB
❑A ❑A Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water Z 6 inches deep
❑B ❑B Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water 3 to 6 inches deep
®C ®C Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water < 3 inches deep
15. Wetland Presence — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB). Do not consider wetlands outside of the streamside area or within the normal
wetted perimeter of assessment reach.
LB RB
❑Y ❑Y Are wetlands present in the streamside area?
ON ON
16. Baseflow, Contributors — assessment reach metric (skip for Size 4 streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all contributors within the assessment reach or within view of and draining to the assessment reach.
®A Streams and/or springs (jurisdictional discharges)
❑B Ponds (include wet detention basins; do not include sediment basins or dry detention basins)
❑C Obstruction passing flow during low -flow periods within the assessment area (beaver dam, leaky dam, bottom -release dam, weir)
®D Evidence of bank seepage or sweating (iron in water indicates seepage)
®E Stream bed or bank soil reduced (dig through deposited sediment if present)
❑F None of the above
17. Baseflow Detractors —assessment area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all that apply.
❑A Evidence of substantial water withdrawals from the assessment reach (includes areas excavated for pump installation)
❑B Obstruction not passing flow during low -flow periods affecting the assessment reach (ex: watertight dam, sediment deposit)
❑C Urban stream (�! 24% impervious surface for watershed)
❑D Evidence that the streamside area has been modified resulting in accelerated drainage into the assessment reach
❑E Assessment reach relocated to valley edge
OF None of the above
18. Shading —assessment reach metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider aspect. Consider "leaf -on" condition.
®A Stream shading is appropriate for stream category (may include gaps associated with natural processes)
❑B Degraded (example: scattered trees)
❑C Stream shading is gone or largely absent

19. Buffer Width — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider "vegetated buffer" and "wooded buffer" separately for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB) starting at the top of bank out
to the first break.
Vegetated Wooded
LB RB LB RB
®A ®A ®A ®A >_ 100 feet wide or extends to the edge of the watershed
❑B ❑B ❑B ❑B From 50 to < 100 feet wide
❑C ❑C ❑C ❑C From 30 to < 50 feet wide
❑D ❑D ❑D ❑D From 10 to < 30 feet wide
❑E ❑E ❑E ❑E < 10 feet wide or no trees
20. Buffer Structure — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB) for Metric 19 ("Vegetated" Buffer Width).
LB RB
®A ®A Mature forest
❑B ❑B Non -mature woody vegetation or modified vegetation structure
❑C ❑C Herbaceous vegetation with or without a strip of trees < 10 feet wide
❑D ❑D Maintained shrubs
❑E ❑E Little or no vegetation
21. Buffer Stressors — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all appropriate boxes for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB). Indicate if listed stressor abuts stream (Abuts), does not abut but is
within 30 feet of stream (< 30 feet), or is between 30 to 50 feet of stream (30-50 feet).
If none of the following stressors occurs on either bank, check here and skip to Metric 22:
Abuts < 30 feet 30-50 feet
LB RB LB RB LB RB
❑A ❑A ❑A ❑A ❑A ❑A Row crops
❑B ❑B ❑B ❑B ❑B ❑B Maintained turf
❑C ❑C ❑C ❑C ❑C ❑C Pasture (no livestock)/commercial horticulture
❑D ❑D ❑D ❑D ❑D ❑D Pasture (active livestock use)
22. Stem Density — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB) for Metric 19 ("Wooded" Buffer Width).
LB RB
®A ❑A Medium to high stem density
❑B ®B Low stem density
El ❑C No wooded riparian buffer or predominantly herbaceous species or bare ground
23. Continuity of Vegetated Buffer — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider whether vegetated buffer is continuous along stream (parallel). Breaks are areas lacking vegetation > 10 feet wide.
LB RB
®A ®A The total length of buffer breaks is < 25 percent.
❑B ❑B The total length of buffer breaks is between 25 and 50 percent.
❑C ❑C The total length of buffer breaks is > 50 percent.
24. Vegetative Composition — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Evaluate the dominant vegetation within 100 feet of each bank or to the edge of the watershed (whichever comes first) as it contributes to
assessment reach habitat.
LB RB
®A ®A Vegetation is close to undisturbed in species present and their proportions. Lower strata composed of native species,
with non-native invasive species absent or sparse.
❑B ❑B Vegetation indicates disturbance in terms of species diversity or proportions, but is still largely composed of native
species. This may include communities of weedy native species that develop after clear -cutting or clearing or
communities with non-native invasive species present, but not dominant, over a large portion of the expected strata or
communities missing understory but retaining canopy trees.
El ❑C Vegetation is severely disturbed in terms of species diversity or proportions. Mature canopy is absent or communities
with non-native invasive species dominant over a large portion of expected strata or communities composed of planted
stands of non -characteristic species or communities inappropriately composed of a single species or no vegetation.
25. Conductivity — assessment reach metric (skip for all Coastal Plain streams)
25a. ❑Yes ®No Was conductivity measurement recorded?
If No, select one of the following reasons. []No Water ❑Other:
25b. Check the box corresponding to the conductivity measurement (units of microsiemens per centimeter).
❑A < 46 ❑ B 46 to < 67 ❑ C 67 to < 79 ❑ D 79 to < 230 ❑ E >_ 230
Notes/Sketch:

Stream Site Name Belk Residential
Stream Category Pa2
Draft NC SAM Stream Rating Sheet
Accompanies User Manual Version 2.1
Date of Assessment 04/05/2021
Assessor Name/Organization Atlas Environmental
Notes of Field Assessment Form (Y/N) NO
Presence of regulatory considerations (Y/N) YES
Additional stream information/supplementary measurements included (Y/N) NO
NC SAM feature type (perennial, intermittent, Tidal Marsh Stream) Perennial
USACE/ NCDWR
Function Class Rating Summary
All Streams Intermittent
(1) Hydrology
HIGH
(2) Baseflow
HIGH
(2) Flood Flow
HIGH
(3) Streamside Area Attenuation
HIGH
(4) Floodplain Access
HIGH
(4) Wooded Riparian Buffer
MEDIUM
(4) Microtopography
LOW
(3) Stream Stability
HIGH
(4) Channel Stability
HIGH
(4) Sediment Transport
HIGH
(4) Stream Geomorphology
MEDIUM
(2) Stream/Intertidal Zone Interaction
NA
(2) Longitudinal Tidal Flow
NA
(2) Tidal Marsh Stream Stability
NA
(3) Tidal Marsh Channel Stability
NA
(3) Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology
NA
(1) Water Quality
HIGH
(2) Baseflow
HIGH
(2) Streamside Area Vegetation
HIGH
(3) Upland Pollutant Filtration
HIGH
(3) Thermoregulation
HIGH
(2) Indicators of Stressors
NO
(2) Aquatic Life Tolerance
MEDIUM
(2) Intertidal Zone Filtration
NA
(1) Habitat
HIGH
(2) In -stream Habitat
MEDIUM
(3) Baseflow
HIGH
(3) Substrate
MEDIUM
(3) Stream Stability
MEDIUM
(3) In -stream Habitat
MEDIUM
(2) Stream -side Habitat
HIGH
(3) Stream -side Habitat
HIGH
(3) Thermoregulation
HIGH
(2) Tidal Marsh In -stream Habitat
NA
(3) Flow Restriction
NA
(3) Tidal Marsh Stream Stability
NA
(4) Tidal Marsh Channel Stability
NA
(4) Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology
NA
(3) Tidal Marsh In -stream Habitat
NA
(2) Intertidal Zone
NA
Overall
HIGH

ROY COOPER
Governor
ELIZABETH S. BISER
Secretary
NORTH CAROLINA
Environmental Quality
December 3, 2021
George Harvey
Caballero Holdings, LLC
3840 Windemere Parkway, Suite 400
Cumming, GA 30041
Project: Shepherd's Farm
Expiration of Acceptance: 6/3/2022
County: Iredell
The purpose of this letter is to notify you that the NCDEQ Division of Mitigation Services (DMS) is willing to
accept payment for compensatory mitigation for impacts associated with the above referenced project as
indicated in the table below. Please note that this decision does not assure that participation in the DMS in -
lieu fee mitigation program will be approved by the permit issuing agencies as mitigation for project impacts.
It is the responsibility of the applicant to contact permitting agencies to determine if payment to the DMS will
be approved. You must also comply with all other state, federal or local government permits, regulations or
authorizations associated with the proposed activity including G.S. § 143-214.11.
This acceptance is valid for six months from the date of this letter and is not transferable. If we have not
received a copy of the issued 404 Permit/401 Certification within this time frame, this acceptance will
expire. It is the applicant's responsibility to send copies of the permits to DMS. Once DMS receives a copy
of the permit(s) an invoice will be issued based on the required mitigation in that permit and payment must
be made prior to conducting the authorized work. The amount of the in -lieu fee to be paid by an applicant is
calculated based upon the Fee Schedule and policies listed on the DMS website.
Based on the information supplied by you in your request to use the DMS, the impacts for which you are
requesting compensatory mitigation credit are summarized in the following table. The amount of mitigation
required and assigned to DMS for this impact is determined by permitting agencies and may exceed the
impact amounts shown below.
River Basin
Impact Location
8-di it HUC
Impact Type
Impact Quantity
Catawba
03050101
Warm Stream
326
Upon receipt of payment, DMS will take responsibility for providing the compensatory mitigation. The
mitigation will be performed in accordance with the In -Lieu Fee Program instrument dated July 28, 2010.
Thank you for your interest in the DMS in -lieu fee mitigation program. If you have any questions or need
additional information, please contact [e-mail].
Sincerely,
FOR James. B Stanfill
Asset Management Supervisor
cc: Jennifer Robertson, agent
D QJ North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality I Division of Mitigation Services
I _ 217 West Jones Street 1 1652 Mail Service Center I Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1652
a� /'� 919.707.8976

ID#* 20210265 Version* 1
Regional Office * Mooresville Regional Office - [phone]
Reviewer Ust* Alan Johnson
Pre -Filing Meeting Request submitted 2/7/2021
......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
Contact Name * Jennifer Robertson
Contact Email Address*
[e-mail]
Project Name *
Belk Residential
Project Owner*
Caballero Holdings, LLC / Mr. Gee Harvey
Project County*
Iredell
Owner Address:
Street Address
338 S. Sharon Amity Road #411
Address Line 2
Cfty
State / Province / Fegion
Charlotte
North Carolina
Postal / Zip Code
Country
28211
United States
Is this a transportation project?* r Yes r No
Type(s) of approval sought from the DWR:
r 401 Water Quality Certification - r 401 Water Quality Certification -
Regular Express
Pr Individual Permit r Modification
r- Shoreline Stabilization
Does this project have an existing project ID#?*
r Yes r No
Do you know the name of the staff member you would like to request a meeting with?
Alan Johnson
Please give a brief project description below.*
Large scale residential subdivision.
Please give a couple of dates you are available for a meeting.
2/15/2021

2/16/2021
2/17/2021
Please attach the documentation you would like to have the meeting about.
11 Parcel Map.pdf 880.07KB
12 Parcel Zoomed Map.pdf 674.77KB
9 PJD.pdf 147.31KB
10 Aquatic Resource Sketch Map.pdf 6.54MB
If-nY
By digitally signing below, I certify that I have read and understood that per the Federal Clean Water Act Section
401 Certification Rule the following statements:
• This form completes the requirement of the Pre -Filing Meeting Request in the Clean Water Act Section 401 Certification
Rule.
• I understand by signing this form that I cannot submit my application until 30 calendar days after this pre -filing
meeting request.
1 also understand that DWR is not required to respond or grant the meeting request.
Your project's thirty -day clock started upon receipt of this application. You will receive notification regarding meeting location
and time if a meeting is necessary. You will receive notification when the thirty -day clock has expired, and you can submit an
application.
Signature
r/,W,W *t ,e"OK, /N
Submittal Date 2/7/2021

Legend
O Review Area
I Iredell County Parcels
Streets
�..�
Al i—
�` . 1
c
J
0
Parcel Map
4659407004.000
4658495222.000
4658585819.000
4658573750.000
J-
0
9
Rd
\1
0 500 1000 1500 2000 Ft
Project Name: Belk Residential
Location: 120 Belk Road Mooresville, NC 28115
For: Caballero Holdings, LLC Attn: Mr. George Harvey
Coordinates: 35.63013,-80.83370 Date: October 29, 2020

Parcel Map Zoomed
fu
Peace Ln a!
00
CD
rq
Ln
41
4658495242.000
Legend
Review Area
Streets
Project Name: Belk Residential
Location: 120 Belk Road Mooresville, NC 28115
For: Caballero Holdings, LLC Attn: Mc George Harvey
Coordinates: 35.63013,'80.83370
Date: October 29, 2020

LV
USGS Topo,
1 \
��"�_„�+ �' � - r'fr. •++ _ r� � + � .f i r� . i��� yr � J `v.__�r
. r
If � ', .�`� . f ; (< � % r J,.r.' jam' ' - � `r• _ �+� .•*
`~-w -_--tir.✓',r f f 1 � � �.r� ,� r--..•' ((��,,� _ / 14-- • -- f � �_ � 'tip
~�_l" ,� I � ��� r•� � , try f r
a
'• `� 1 / � - _•._ ..-•---' -r' .1 ` i � � is •
1117
Legend
O Review Area
USGS Topo 0 500 1000 1500 2000 Ft
A \�
�W AW ,
Project Name: Belk Residential
Location: 120 Belk Road Mooresville, NC 28115
For: Caballero Holdings, LLC Attn: Mr. George Harvey
Coordinates: 35.63013,-80.83370
Date: October 29, 2020

Project Name: Belk Residential
-LA Location: 120 Belk Road Mooresville, NC 28115
ISONmENTSAL For: Caballero Holdings, LLC Attn: Mr. George Harvey
Coordinates: 35.63013,-80.83370 I Date: October 29, 2020

Y
r
t
.egend
Review Area

0
WN
Gold Finch Ln
Legend
O Review Area
Streets
NWI
Freshwater Forested/Shrub Wetland
Freshwater Pond S
I1 Riverine
NWI Map
0
Project Name: Belk Residential
Location: 120 Belk Road Mooresville, NC 28115
4fU
m
A
Rd
0 500 1000 1500 2000 Ft
For: Caballero Holdings, LLC Attn: Mr. George Harvey
Coordinates: 35.63013,-80.83370 Date: October 29, 2020

Soil Map—Iredell County, North Carolina
(Review Area)
MAP LEGEND
Area of Interest (AOI)
Area of Interest (AOI)
Soils
Soil Map Unit Polygons
Soil Map Unit Lines
®
Soil Map Unit Points
Special
Point Features
V
Blowout
C9
Borrow Pit
X
Clay Spot
®
Closed Depression
X
Gravel Pit
4
Gravelly Spot
Landfill
R
Lava Flow
Marsh or swamp
Mine or Quarry
Miscellaneous Water
0
Perennial Water
N
Rock Outcrop
+
Saline Spot
Sandy Spot
Severely Eroded Spot
Q'
Sinkhole
Slide or Slip
Sodic Spot
MAP INFORMATION
Spoil Area
The soil surveys that comprise your AOI were mapped at
1:12,000.
Stony Spot
Please rely on the bar scale on each map sheet for map
Very Stony Spot
measurements.
Wet Spot
Source of Map: Natural Resources Conservation Service
Other
Web Soil Survey URL:
Coordinate System: Web Mercator (EPSG:3857)
�.
Special Line Features
Maps from the Web Soil Survey are based on the Web Mercator
Water Features
projection, which preserves direction and shape but distorts
Streams and Canals
distance and area. A projection that preserves area, such as the
Albers equal-area conic projection, should be used if more
Transportation
accurate calculations of distance or area are required.
}}{
Rails
This product is generated from the USDA-NRCS certified data as
..ter
Interstate Highways
of the version date(s) listed below.
a
US Routes
Soil Survey Area: Iredell County, North Carolina
Major Roads
Survey Area Data: Version 25, Jun 4, 2020
Local Roads
Soil map units are labeled (as space allows) for map scales
1:50,000 or larger.
Background
Aerial Photography
Date(s) aerial images were photographed: Nov 17, 2019—Dec
18, 2019
The orthophoto or other base map on which the soil lines were
compiled and digitized probably differs from the background
imagery displayed on these maps. As a result, some minor
shifting of map unit boundaries may be evident.
USpq Natural Resources Web Soil Survey
Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey
Project Name: Belk Residential
T' t'A'S Location: 120 Belk Road Mooresville, NC 28115
�. RONMENTAL For: Caballero Holdings, LLC Attn: Mr. George Harvey
10/29/2020
Page 2 of 3
Coordinates: 35.63013,-80.83370
Date: October 29, 2020

Map Unit Legend
Map Unit Symbol
Map Unit Name
Acres in AOI
Percent of AOI
ApB
Appling sandy loam, 2 to 6
6.0
2.7%
percent slopes
CeB2
Cecil sandy day loam, 2 to 6
30.2
13.7%
percent slopes, moderately
eroded
CeC2
Cecil sandy day loam, 6 to 10
52.1
23.6%
percent slopes, moderately
eroded
CgC
Cecil -Urban land complex, 2 to
2.3
1.1%
10 percent slopes
CM
Chewada loam, 0 to 2 percent
20.0
9.1%
slopes, frequently flooded
McD4
Madison-Udorthents complex,
6.7
3.1 %
2 to 15 percent slopes,
gulled
MaE4
Madison-Udorthents complex,
13.2
6.0%
15 to 25 percent slopes,
gullied
PaE
Pacolet sandy loam, 15 to 25
12.0
5.5%
percent slopes
Pal'
Pacolet sandy loam, 25 to 45
9.5
4.3%
percent slopes
PcB2
Pacolet sandy clay loam, 2 to 6
1.7
0.8%
percent slopes, moderately
eroded
PcC2
Pacolet sandy day loam, 6 to
27.6
12.5%
10 percent slopes,
moderately eroded
Pd)2
Pacolet sandy day loam, 10 to
23.8
10.8%
15 percent slopes,
moderately eroded
PcE2
Pacolet sandy day loam, 15 to
14.0
6.4%
25 percent slopes,
moderately eroded
W
Water
1.0
0.5%
Totals for Area of Interest
220.2
100.0%
USDA Natural Resources
�dllliiiil Conservation Service
Web Soil Survey 10/29/2020
National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 3 of 3
Project Name: Belk Residential
ONMENTAL
Location: 120 Belk Road Mooresville, NC 28115
For: Caballero Holdings, LLC Attn: Mr. George Harvey
Coordinates: 35.63013,-80.83370 1 Date: October 29, 2020

g-1 12U UCIK 14a. MoorcsVide. r, X10,
Eih am cfnrl?ORPI
13
'5,'7 -'--Ida ic Acres D,
`-re;
-,z ; I
Su acc atci-Clast
licat-ont:
Rd
... ......
holly 0,
m lc vpetrcom of mouth
1,0 33ft ca"', on :
vvS.Iv vz
Octc ot Uca3.
What doosi'th-a,
Moro into
class. mean?
r 1p,
River Bet m:
C41t&WbS
Saq
T
Shinnville
115
.946 ff
Project Name: Belk Residential
"ONMENTAL
Location: 120 Belk Road Mooresville, NC 28115
For: Caballero Holdings, LLC Attn: Mr. George Harvey
__Date:
Coordinates: 35.63013, -80.83370
October 29, 2020

mm

i-

r Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan
D 2020 2020 2020 2020 2020 2020 2020 2021
35.63013,-80.83370
2020-11-06
823.68
Severe wetness (2020-10)
Wet Season
30 Days Ending
301h %ile (in)
70rh %ile (in)
Observed (in)
Wetness Condition
Condition Value
Month
2020-11-06
1.879134
4.206299
4.547244
Wet
3
2020-10-07
1.922835
4.556299
4.925197
Wet
3
2020-09-07
3.012599
4.888977
10.88189
Wet
3
Result
s made by the
Weather Station Name I Coordinates I Elevation (ft) I Distance (mi) I Elevation A I Weighted A

Stream Reach Evaluation Form
Date:
11-6-2020 1 Evaluator: I Atlas Environmental, Inc.
Eastin :
35.63000
Project:
Belk Road Subdivision
Northing:
-80.83878
Cornelius Creek, CH 100, CH 200 Perennial
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent if > 19 or perennial if > 30*
41.0
(right -click the purple number and left -click Update Field to summarizepoints)
A. Geomorphology
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
SCORE
la. Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
3
3. In -channel structure: riffle- / step- pool sequence
0
1
2
3
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
2
5. Active/relic flood lain
0
1
2
3
1 2
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
2
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
2
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
1
9. Grade controls
0
0.5
1
1.5
1
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
1
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes = 3
3
Geomorphology Subtotal
WISM
a Man-made ditches are not rated: see discussion in NCDWQ Manual
B. Hvdroloav
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
3
13. Iron Oxidizing Bacteria
0
1
2
3
1
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
1
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1.5
0.5
16. Or anic debris lines or piles Wrack lines
0
0.5
1
1.5
0.5
17. Soil -based Evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes = 3
3
Hydrology Subtotal
C. Bioloav
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
2
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
2
20. Macrobenthos note diversity and abundance
0
1
2
3
2
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
0
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
1
23. Crayfish
0
1 0.5
1 1
1.5
1
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1 1.5
1
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1 1.5
0
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW= 0.75, OBL= 1.5, Other= 0
0
Biology Subtotal
oerennial streams may also be identified usinq other methods. See page 35 of NCDWQ manual.
Notes:
I certify that this evaluation conforms to the latest version of
f_ Jf�vau-fae�
the NCDWQ document entitled Methodology for Identification
of Intermittent and Perennial Streams and their Oriqins.
r U
Signature of Certified Evaluator
(version 4.11)
Form #PC039

Stream Reach Evaluation Form
Date:
11-18-2020 1 Evaluator: FAtIas Environmental, Inc.
Eastin :
35.63235
Project:
Belk Road Subdivision
Northing:
-80.83173
CH 300 Intermittent
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent if > 19 or perennial if > 30"
2%.�
(right -click the purple number and left -click Update Field to summarizepoints)
A. Geomorphology
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
SCORE
1,9. Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
2
3. In -channel structure: riffle- / step- pool sequence
0
1
2
3
2
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
1
5. Active/relic flood lain
0
1
2
3
1 1
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
1
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
1
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
1
9. Grade controls
0
0.5
1
1.5
0.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
0.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes = 3
0
Geomorphology Subtotal
a Man-made ditches are not rated: see discussion in NCDWQ Manual
B. Hydrology
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
3
13. Iron Oxidizing Bacteria
0
1
2
3
2
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
1
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1.5
0
16. Organic debris lines or piles Wrack lines
0
0.5
1
1.5
0.5
17. Soil -based Evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes = 3
3
Hydrology Subtotal
C. Biology
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
1
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
1
20. Macrobenthos note diversity and abundance
0
1
2
3
1
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
0
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
0
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
1
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
0.5
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1.5
0
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW= 0.75, OBL= 1.5, Other= 0
0
Biology Subtotal
cicinuai JucanlJ IIICIY QIJU UU IUUIILIIICU UJIII Uurol 111ULIJUUD. OCC cl C J.7 UI IVIJUVVW IIIdIIUdI.
Notes:
I certify that this evaluation conforms to the latest version of �L4�'LGoIG..f�
the NCDWQ document entitled Methodology for Identification
of Intermittent and Perennial Streams and their Origins.
nature of Certified Evaluator
(version 4.11)
Form #PC039

Stream Reach Evaluation Form
Date: 11-18-2020 1 Evaluator: I Atlas Environmental, Inc. Eastin : 35.62581
Project: Belk Residential Subdivision Northing:-80.83211
CH 500, 600 Perennial
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent if > 19 or perennial if > 30*
(right -click the purple number and left -click Update Field to summarizepoints)
A. Geomorphology
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
SCORE
la. Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
3
3. In -channel structure: riffle- / step- pool sequence
0
1
2
3
2
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
2
5. Active/relic flood lain
0
1
2
3
1
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
1
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
1
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
1
9. Grade controls
0
0.5
1
1.5
0.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
0.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes = 3
0
Geomorphology Subtotal
a Man-made ditches are not rated: see discussion in NCDWQ Manual
B. Hydrology
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
3
13. Iron Oxidizing Bacteria
0
1
2
3
2
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
1
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1.5
0
16. Organic debris lines or piles Wrack lines
0
0.5
1
1.5
0.5
17. Soil -based Evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes = 3
3
Hydrology Subtotal
C. Bioloav
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
2
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
1
20. Macrobenthos note diversity and abundance
0
1
2
3
2
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
0
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
1
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1 1.5
1
24. Amphibians
0
1 0.5
1
1.5
0.5
25. Algae
0
1 0.5
1
1.5
0
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW= 0.75, OBL= 1.5, Other= 0
0
Biology Subtotal
cciuuai Ju U0...0 1110Y 01O UV R MIL111CU U0111Y UUMN IIICUIUUJ. OCC G C JU UI IVLLIVVU mdflUdl.
Notes:
I certify that this evaluation conforms to the latest version
the NCDWQ document entitled Methodology for Identification UU
of Intermittent and Perennial Streams and their Origins.
nature of Certified Evaluator
(version 4.11)
Form #PC039

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers OMB Control M, 0710•xxxx, Exp: Pending
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT:
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R (Authority: AR 335-15, paragraph 5.2a)
Project/Site: Belk Residential City/County: Mooresville/ Iredell Sampling Date: N°va W6,2020
Applicant/Owner: Caballero Holdings, LLC State: NC Sampling Point: Fmeafedwedand
Investigator(s): J Robertson, J Sinclair, A Baggarley Section, Township, Range: Mooresville
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): Hillside Local relief (concave, convex, none): Convex Slope (%): —2
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.63058 Long:-80.83855 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: Pacolet NWI classification: None
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No X (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No within a Wetland? Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
Climate conditions are wetter than normal. See attached climate data report (NOAA's Daily Global Historical Climatology Network). Wetlands are
forested.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required:
check all that apply)
—Surface Soil Cracks (136)
_Surface Water (Al)
_True Aquatic Plants (1314)
X Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
X High Water Table (A2)
—Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
—Drainage Patterns (1310)
X Saturation (A3)
X Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
X Moss Trim Lines (1316)
—Water Marks (131)
_ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
—Sediment Deposits (132)
—Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
X Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Drift Deposits (133)
_Thin Muck Surface (C7)
—Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_Algal Mat or Crust (134)
_Other (Explain in Remarks)
_Stunted or Stressed Plants (131)
_Iron Deposits (135)
_Geomorphic Position (132)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery
(137)
—Shallow Aquitard (133)
—Water-Stained Leaves (139)
_Microtopographic Relief (134)
Aquatic Fauna (B13)
FAC-Neutral Test (135)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes
No X Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes X
No Depth (inches): 0
Saturation Present? Yes X
No Depth (inches): 0
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
Wetter than normal
ENG FORM 611E-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: Forested Wetland
Absolute
Dominant
Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 )
% Cover
Species?
Status
Dominance Test worksheet:
1.
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
5
Yes
FACW
Number of Dominant Species
2.
Liquidambar styraciflua
2
No
FAC
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
3
(A)
3.
Acer rubrum
2
No
FAC
Total Number of Dominant
4.
Quercus alba
3
Yes
FACU
Species Across All Strata:
5
(B)
5•
Percent of Dominant Species
6.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
60.0%
(A/B)
7.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
12
=Total Cover
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
50% of total cover:
6 20%
of total cover:
3
OBL species 0 x 1 =
0
Saolina/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15
)
FACW species 9 x 2 =
18
1.
Ligustrum sinense
10
Yes
FACU
FAC species 21 x 3 =
63
2.
Acer rubrum
5
Yes
FAC
FACU species 13 x 4 =
52
3.
UPL species 0 x 5 =
0
4.
Column Totals: 43 (A)
133
(B)
5,
Prevalence Index = B/A =
3.09
6.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
8.
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
9.
3 - Prevalence Index is s3.0'
15 =Total Cover
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
50% of total cover:
8 20% of total cover:
3
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5 )
_Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
1. Juncus effusus
2 No
FACW
'indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
2. Carex bromoides
2 No
FACW
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
3. Po/ygonum douglasll
10 Yes
FAC
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
4•
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
5_
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
6.
7•
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
B.
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft (1
m) tall.
9.
10.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
11
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
14 =Total Cover
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
50% of total cover:
7 20% of total cover:
3
height.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30 )
1. Toxicodendron radicans 2 No FAC
2.
3.
4.
5.
Hydrophytic
2 =Total Cover Vegetation
50% of total cover: 1 20% of total cover: 1 Present? Yes X No
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: Fmscedweaand
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Loc Texture Remarks
0-2 5YR 5/1 60 5YR 5/3 20 C M Loamy/Clayey Distinct redox concentrations
2-16 7.5YR 5/2 100 Loamy/Clayey
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
—Black Histic (A3)
—Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
(MLRA 147, 148)
—Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
—Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
—Stratified Layers (A5)
X Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
—Red Parent Material (F21)
—Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
—Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
(outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
X Redox Depressions (178)
_Very Shallow Dark Surface (1722)
_Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
_Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
_Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
MLRA 136)
—Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Umbric Surface (1713) (MLRA 122, 136)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
—Stripped Matrix (S6)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
wetland hydrology must be present,
Dark Surface (S7)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116-4SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers OMB Control #: 0710-xxxx, Exp: Pending
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT.,
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R (Authority: AR 335.15, paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: Belk Residential City/County: Mooresville/ Iredell Sampling Date: Novemeere.2020
Applicant/Owner: Caballero Holdings, LLC State: NC Sampling Point: Forested Upland
Investigator(s): J Robertson, J Sinclair, A Baggarley Section, Township, Range: Mooresville
Landforrn (hillside, terrace, etc.): Hillside Local relief (concave, convex, none): Convex Slope (°/d): —3
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Let: 35.45111 Long:-80.80550 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: Pacolet NWI classification: None
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No X (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No X Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X within a Wetland? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
Climate conditions are wetter than normal. See attached climate data report (NOAA's Daily Global Historical Climatology Network). Uplands
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two reouired)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
—Surface Soil Cracks (136)
_Surface Water (Al)
_True Aquatic Plants (1314)
_Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
—High Water Table (A2)
—Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
—Drainage Patterns (1310)
_Saturation (A3)
_Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_Moss Trim Lines (B16)
—Water Marks (131)
_ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_Sediment Deposits (132)
_Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_Drift Deposits (B3)
_Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_Algal Mat or Crust (134)
—Other (Explain in Remarks)
—Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_Iron Deposits (B5)
_Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_Shallow Aquitard (133)
—Water-Stained Leaves (139)
_Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (B13)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes
No X Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes
No X Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes
No X Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
Wetter than normal
ENG FORM 6115-4-510, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: Forested Upland
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 )
% Cover
Species?
Status
Dominance Test worksheet:
1.
Quercus rubra
10
Yes
FACU
Number of Dominant Species
2.
Liriodendron tulipifera
5
No
FACU
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
2
(A)
3.
Acer rubrum
5
No
FAC
Total Number of Dominant
4.
Quercus alba
10
Yes
FACU
Species Across All Strata:
6
(B)
5'
Percent of Dominant Species
6.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
33.3%
(A/B)
7.
Prevalence Index workshest:
30
=Total Cover
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
50% of total cover:
15 20% of total cover:
6
OBL species 0 x 1 =
0
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15
)
FACW species 0 x 2 =
0
1.
Ligustrum sinense
10
Yes
FACU
FAC species 15 x 3 =
45
2.
Acer rubrum
5
Yes
FAC
FACU species 42 x 4 =
168
3.
UPL species 0 x 5 =
0
4.
Column Totals: 57 (A)
213
(B)
5.
Prevalence Index = B/A =
3.74
6.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
8.
_ 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
9.
3 - Prevalence Index is 53.0+
15 =Total Cover
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
50% of total cover:
8 20% of total cover: 3
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5 )
-Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
1. Fragaria vesca
5 Yes FACU
'indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
2. Hexastylis arifolia
3 Yes FAC
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
3.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
4.
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
5.
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
6
height.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
8
=Total Cover
50% of total cover:
4
20% of total cover:
2
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30
)
1.
Parthenocissus quinquefolia
2
No
FACU
2.
Toxicodendron radicans
2
No
FAC
3.
4.
5.
4
=Total Cover
50% of total cover:
2
20% of total cover:
1
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft (1
m) tall.
Herb -All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes No X
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: Forested upland
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Loc Texture Remarks
0-6 5YR 5/3 40 Loamy/Clayey
6-16 7.5YR 5/4 100 Loamy/Clayey
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
—Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
—Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
—Black Histic (A3)
—Loamy Mucky Mineral (171) (MLRA 136)
(MLRA 147, 148)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
—Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
_Stratified Layers (A5)
_Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
—Red Parent Material (F21)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
(outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
—Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
—Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
—Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
—Other (Explain in Remarks)
_Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
MLRA 136)
—Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
wetland hydrology must be present,
Dark Surface (S7)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

tCornelius CreekatCH1O
2:CH 151
:.
.
�
}m/
e
R4"�
$s Nov
4:CH 199
9 CH 20
a WL1000 E WL2000

� t•�s
Y
i
',/``jam",;
•.j;
r

a•
A
ice,
a.-
r-y �
_
Y
l
mow...
•:�i�w`�'
_ �
- �.
_ _
t:
�
I �..'�
I __} �
'�'� "FTC,
_ �. � f--
�d r.,
y✓,��:'Y �'_
�
s
t
•r

Photograph and Data Form Location Map
;i/�ll� ���- i I � �- l i 1 )�1///i%%����)Jilill (�������lll/i///ll�r��� � ; �'%/% � , •
,I Photo 2 k
Photo 1 .�
Legend
O Review Area
OIredell Co. Parcels�-
--- 2 Ft Contours
Streets
Delineation -
Intermittent
® Perennial
Pond
Wetland Potential Non Wetland
= Culvert Cornelius Creek, - 2855 LF
Photo 5
DWR Stream Form
Project Name: Belk Residential
QLocation: 120 Belk Road Mooresville, NC 28115
ONMFNTAL For: Caballero Holdings, LLC Attn: Mr. George Harvey
Pace 3 of 7 Detail 1 Coordinates: 35.63013,-80.83370
0 100 200
Date: November 16, 2020
Elm

Photoqraph and Data Form Location
Legend
O Review Area
OIredell Co. Parcels
-- - 2 Ft Contours
Streets
Delineation
Intermittent
= Perennial
Pond
Wetland
M Culvert
Photo 4
Photo 3
0 100 200 300 400 Ft
Project Name: Belk Residential
Location: 120 Belk Road Mooresville, NC 28115
(711RONMENTAL For: Caballero Holdings, LLC Attn: Mr. George Harvey
Paae 4 of 7 Detail 2 Coordinates: 35.63013,-80.83370 Date: November 16, 2020

Photos 6, 7
Forested upland Data Form
/ ,—'
Legend
O Review Area
OIredell Co. Parcels
- — 2 Ft Contours
Streets
Delineation
Intermittent
M Perennial
Pond
Wetland
= Culvert
graph and Data Form Location M
Photo 10
j Photo 9
Photo 8
,
SLForested
Wetland Data Form
0 100 200
300 400 Ft
Project Name: Belk Residential
Location: 120 Belk Road Mooresville, NC 28115
IRDNMENTAL For: Caballero Holdings, LLC Attn: Mr. George Harvey
Paae 5 of 7 Detail 3 Coordinates: 35.63013,-80.83370 Date: November 16, 2020

Photograph and Data Form Location M
I Photo 12 1
DWR Stream Form
Photo 11
Legend
O Review Area
OIredell Co. Parcels
— 2 Ft Contours
Streets
Delineation
Intermittent
M Perennial
e Pond
= Wetland
= Culvert
;
Photo 13
Photo 14 1
Photo 17
Photo 15, 16
0 100 200 300 400 Ft
Project Name: Belk Residential
Q C Location: 120 Belk Road Mooresville, NC 28115
NMENTAL For: Caballero Holdings, LLC Attn: Mr. George Harvey
Page 6 of 7 Detail 4 Coordinates: 35.63013,-80.83370 Date: November 16, 2020

Photoqraph and Data Form Location Ma
Photo 19
0
—� Photo 18 I
DWR Stream Form
--A Photo 20 1
1 Photo 24 1
Legend
O Review Area
= Iredell Co. Parcels
2 Ft Contours
Streets
Delineation
Intermittent
M Perennial
Pond
Wetland
Culvert
Photo 21 E
Photo 22
r
i' %i - j i
\ Photo 23
Project Name: Belk Residential
Location: 120 Belk Road Mooresville, NC 28115
iENTAL For: Caballero Holdin'1%rgs, LLC Attn: Mr. George Harvey
Page 7 of 7 Detail 5 Coordinates: 35.63013,-80.83370 Date: November 16, 2020