20140189 Ver 1_Year 6 Monitoring Report_2021_20211217

ID#* 20140189
Select Reviewer:
Erin Davis
Initial Review Completed Date 12/20/2021
Mitigation Project Submittal - 12/17/2021
Version* 1
Is this a Prospectus, Technical Proposal or a New Site?*
Type of Mitigation Project:*
Stream Wetlands Buffer Nutrient Offset
(Select all that apply)
Project Contact Information
Contact Name:*
Katie Webber
Project Information
ID#:* 20140189
Existing ID#
Project Type: DMS • Mitigation Bank
Project Name: Arrington Bridge III
County: Wayne
Document Information
O Yes O No
Email Address-*
[e-mail]
Version:* 1
Existing Version
Mitigation Document Type:*
Mitigation Monitoring Report
File Upload: AB III _MY6_2021_Monitoring Report_Only.pdf 9.32MB
Please upload only one PDF of the complete file that needs to be submitted...
Signature
Print Name:* Kathleen Webber
Signature: *

ARRINGTON BRIDGE III WETLAND MITIGATION SITE
YEAR 6 MONITORING REPORT
USACE PROJECT # SAW-2015-00360
WAYNE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
Prepared For:
EBX-Neuse I, LLC
3600 Glenwood Avenue, Suite 100
Raleigh, NC 27612
919-209-1055
Prepared by:
res Resource Environmental Solutions, LLC
o3600 Glenwood Avenue, Suite 100
Raleigh, NC 27612
919-209-1055
December 2021

TABLE OF CONTENTS
1 PROJECT GOALS, BACKGROUND AND ATTRIBUTES........................................................ I
1.1 Location and Setting............................................................................................................... I
1.2 Project Goals and Objectives.................................................................................................. I
1.3 Project Structure..................................................................................................................... 2
1.3.1 Wetland Restoration Type and Approach......................................................................2
1.4 Project History, Mitigation Bank Establishment, Contacts and Attribute Data ..................... 3
1.4.1 Project History................................................................................................................3
1.4.2 Project Watersheds......................................................................................................... 3
2 SUCCESS CRITERIA................................................................................................................... 4
2.1 Wetland Success Criteria........................................................................................................4
2.2 Vegetation Success Criteria....................................................................................................4
2.3 Scheduling/Reporting.............................................................................................................4
3 MONITORING PLAN................................................................................................................... 5
3.1 Visual Assessment Monitoring............................................................................................... 5
3.2 Vegetation.............................................................................................................................. 5
4 Maintenance and Contingency plan............................................................................................... 6
4.1 Wetlands.................................................................................................................................6
4.2 Vegetation.............................................................................................................................. 6
5 Monitoring Year 6 (MY6).............................................................................................................. 6
5.1 Year 6 Data Collection........................................................................................................... 6
5.1.1 Hydrology.......................................................................................................................6
5.1.2 Vegetation.......................................................................................................................7
5.1.3 Photo Documentation..................................................................................................... 7
5.2 Adaptive Management............................................................................................................7
6 REFERENCES...............................................................................................................................9

Appendices
Appendix A. General Tables and Figures
Table 1. Project Components and Mitigation Credits
Table 2. Project Activity and Reporting History
Table 3. Project Contacts
Table 4. Project Information
Figure 1. Project Vicinity Map
Figure 2. Current Conditions Plan View
Appendix B. Vegetation Data and Site Photos
Table 5. Planted Species Summary
Table 6. Vegetation Plot Mitigation Success Summary
Table 7. Stem Count Total and Planted Species (Species by Plot)
Vegetation Plot Photos
Year 6 General Condition Photos
Appendix C. Hydrology Data
Table 8. 2021 Rainfall Summary
Table 9. 2021 Max Hydroperiod
Table 10. Summary of Groundwater Monitoring Results
Chart 1. 2021 Groundwater Monitoring Gauge Hydrographs

Arrington Bridge HI WetlandMitigation Site • USGS HUC 03020201
Year 6 Monitoring Report- Wayne County, North Carolina • September 2021
1 PROJECT GOALS, BACKGROUND AND ATTRIBUTES
1.1 Location and Setting
The Arrington Bridge III Wetland Mitigation Project is located in Wayne County approximately three
miles southwest of Goldsboro, NC. To access the Site from the town of Goldsboro, travel south on NC
HWY 117, and turn left onto Arrington Bridge Road (NC Highway 581). Turn right onto the dirt
entrance road immediately after crossing the railroad tracks (approximately 0.15 miles). Turn left after
0.3 miles. In 0.1 miles, follow the left fork to access the northern end of the Site. Following the path to
the right will lead to the middle and southern portions of the Site.
The site is located in the Neuse River Basin within Cataloging Unit 03020201 (NCDWQ sub -basin 03-
04-12). The project is located within the Neuse River Basin (8-digit USGS HUC 03020201, 14-digit
USGS HUC 03020201200040.
1.2 Project Goals and Objectives
The Arrington Bridge III Wetland Mitigation Project provides numerous ecological and water quality
benefits within the Neuse River Basin. While many of these benefits are limited to the project area,
others, such as pollutant removal and improved aquatic and terrestrial habitat, have more far-reaching
effects. Expected improvements to water quality, hydrology, and habitat are outlined below.
Design Goals and Objectives
Benefits Related to Water Quality
Benefit will be achieved through cattle exclusion and direct removal of fecal inputs, filtering of runoff
Nutrient removal
through wetland areas, the conversion of active cattle pastures to forested wetlands, and improved
denitrification and nutrient uptake through wetland zones.
Runoff filtration
Benefit will be achieved through the restoration of buffer areas that will receive and filter runoff,
thereby reducing nutrients and sediment concentrations reaching water bodies downstream.
Benefits to Flood Attenuation
Water storage
Benefit will be achieved through the restoration of wetland areas which will infiltrate more water
during precipitation events than under current site conditions.
Improved groundwater
Benefit will be achieved through the increased storage of precipitation in wetland areas, ephemeral
recharge
depressions, and reconnection of existing floodplain. Greater storage of water will lead to improved
infiltration and groundwater recharge.
Benefits Related to Ecological Processes
Restoration of habitats
Benefit will be achieved by restoring riparian wetland habitat to appropriate bottomland hardwood
ecosystem.

Arrington Bridge HI WetlandMitigation Site • USGS HUC 03020201
Year 6 Monitoring Report- Wayne County, North Carolina • September 2021
1.3 Project Structure
Arrington Bridge III Site Project Components — Wetland Mitigation
Mitigation Type
Total Acres
Mitigation Ratio
WMUs
Enhancement
5.80
3:1
1.93
Enhancement Low
6.07
5:1
1.21
Restoration
29.37
1:1
29.37
Non -Wetland Buffer
16.62
N/A
N/A
TOTAL:
57.40
32.51
1.3.1 Wetland Restoration Type and Approach
The Arrington Bridge III Wetland Mitigation project provides 32.51 wetland mitigation units through
a combination of Wetland Restoration and two levels of Wetland Enhancement. The existing pasture
areas on the Site are treated with Wetland Restoration at a credit ratio of 1:1. Wetland Restoration
activities included: plugging the main channel and side ditches, removing fill, and regrading the area
to reconstruct historical contours. A credit ratio of 3:1 was put in place for higher -uplift wetland
enhancement areas, including a drained area of planted cypress, an excavated pond, and forested areas
along the north side of the main ditch. A ratio of 5:1 was put in place for the lower -uplift wetland
enhancement areas, which are primarily along the north side of the main ditch. Both levels of Wetland
Enhancement were treated by enhancing the hydrology and providing long-term protection. This was
accomplished by filling the ditches across the site to raise the water table and restore a more natural
drainage pattern. Additionally, the pond was backfilled with the adjacent spoil pile and planted with
trees and a permanent seed mix. Although this was restored to a wetland, it receives Enhancement
credits at a ratio of 3:1 because the pond was already a jurisdictional feature.
1.3.1.1 Wetland Restoration Summary
The primary wetland restoration activities included:
• The backfilling and stabilizing of the main channelized drainage feature and existing side ditches;
• The fill material on one of the access roads was removed and stabilized to restore the natural flow
pattern, and the pond was backfilled with the adjacent spoil pile;
• Areas of cut and fill were re -graded to create a continuous bottomland wetland system.
Plugging ditches and main channelized drainage feature
Plugging of the main feature and side ditches was accomplished through a combination of backfilling
and the construction of ditch plugs throughout the easement area. Approximately 8,600 linear feet of
open ditch was backfilled within the easement boundary. Ditches are filled, compacted, and graded to
the adjacent floodplain elevation. Typical ditch plugs are 20 feet wide and extend above the top of the
ditch bank elevation a minimum of 6 inches. Plugs are constructed of compacted fill placed in 12-inch
lifts with the upper 18 inches minimally compacted to allow for plant growth. Plugs are spaced such
that successive plugs are no more than 6 inches in elevation below one another. At the point of departure
from the conservation easement, a headwater -type channel is graded to the existing ditch elevation.
When possible, ditch plugs are constructed using excavated material from the restoration and
construction of wetland pools.
Fill Removal, Pond Bacl�fill, and LCgradiLig o fsite
Disturbed soils underlain by hydric soils (as described in the soils report) were graded to allow for a
more natural hydrologic regime and function. Additionally, the fill material on the access roads was
removed to restore the natural flow pattern of the site. The restoration site is very gently sloping (less
than one percent) but does contain approximately three feet of elevation difference across the site.
Several decades of agricultural management and mining operations has eliminated microtopography

Arrington Bridge HI WetlandMitigation Site • USGS HUC 03020201
Year 6 Monitoring Report- Wayne County, North Carolina • September 2021
across the site. As outlined in the soils report located in the Mitigation Plan, approximately 12.6 acres
of the project area is described as disturbed soils having hydric indicators and lacking wetland
hydrology. These included large areas in a lower landscape position located adjacent to visible borrow
pits. The soils in these areas had variable textures that were exhibiting hydric indicators. All of this area
was in pasture and being grazed by cattle. One excavated pond is backfilled with soil from the adjacent
spoil pile. The filled pond is considered enhancement due to the jurisdictional status of the existing
open water habitat. The entire conservation easement was disked to break up the plow layer, increase
surface roughness, and promote infiltration.
1.3.1.2 Proposed Wetland Hydrology
The Arrington Bridge III Mitigation Site was once a Cypress Gum Swamp wetland subject to prolonged
inundation as indicated by soils mapping, historical aerial photography, and personal communication
with landowners. By 1974, the area was cleared, much of the borrow removed, and conversion of area
to agricultural production was occurring. The ditch system was mostly in place. The restoration plan
for the site consisted of filling and stabilizing ditches, converting active pasture to a bottomland wetland
system, restoring bottomland hardwood forests, and enhancing the hydrology of existing wetlands. The
backfilling and plugging of ditches lengthens wetland hydroperiods by halting artificial subsurface
drainage and preventing rapid surface drainage. Periodic flooding is vital to sustain plants and wildlife
characteristic of riverine wetlands (Ainslie, 2002). The drainage area for the project area is
approximately 0.63 square miles. The restored wetlands have a variable flooding regime due to the
small size of the drainage area
1.4 Project History, Mitigation Bank Establishment, Contacts and Attribute Data
1.4.1 Project History
The Arrington Bridge III Wetland Mitigation Site was restored by EBX Neuse I, LLC (EBX). EBX is
an entity of Resource Environmental Solutions LLC (RES). Tables 2, 3, and 4 (Appendix A) provide a
time sequence and information pertaining to the project activities, history, contacts, and baseline
information. EBX, acting as the Bank Sponsor, established a Conservation Easement (CE) and will
monitor the Site for a minimum of seven years. The Mitigation Plan provides detailed information
regarding bank operation, including long term management and annual monitoring activities. The Bank
Sponsor has conveyed the CE to the long-term land steward, the North Carolina Wildlife Habitat
Foundation (NCWHF). The Bank Sponsor will ensure that the conveyed CE will allow for the
implementation of an initial monitoring phase, which will be developed during the design phase and
conducted by the Bank Sponsor. The conveyed CE will allow for yearly monitoring and, if necessary,
maintenance of the Site during the yearly monitoring phases. These activities will be conducted in
accordance with the terms and conditions of the Neu -Con Wetland and Stream Umbrella Mitigation
Bank made and entered into by EBX, USACE, and NCDWR.
1.4.2 Project Watersheds
The easement totals 57.40 acres with one unnamed tributary entering the easement and draining into a
channelized wetland ditch, which runs the length of the easement. The total drainage area at the
downstream limits of the project is 403 acres (0.63 m12). The land use in the project watershed is
approximately 41 percent cultivated cropland, 18 percent pasture, 16 percent forested, eight percent
residential, eight percent commercial, and seven percent managed open space.

Arrington Bridge HI WetlandMitigation Site • USGS HUC 03020201
Year 6 Monitoring Report- Wayne County, North Carolina • September 2021
2 SUCCESS CRITERIA
The success criteria for the Arrington Bridge III Site follows accepted and approved success criteria
presented in the North Carolina Wetland Mitigation Guidelines and subsequent agency guidance.
Specific success criteria components are presented below.
2.1 Wetland Success Criteria
2.1.1 Wetland Hydrology Criteria
The Natural Resources Conservation Service (MRCS) has a current WETS table for Wayne County
upon which to base a normal rainfall amount and average growing season. The closest comparable data
station was determined to be WETS station NC713 Goldsboro S Johnson AFB. This station is located
at the Seymour Johnson Air Force Base approximately 1.5 miles east of the proposed mitigation site.
The growing season for Wayne County is 262 days long, extending from March 4 to November 21, and
is based on a daily minimum temperature greater than 28 degrees Fahrenheit occurring in five of ten
years.
Because of the surface roughing and shallow depressions, a range of hydroperiods and inundation is
expected. The hydrology success criterion for the site is to restore the water table at the site so that it
will remain continuously within 12 inches of the soil surface for at least eight percent of the growing
season (approximately 21 days) at each groundwater gauge location.
Restoration and enhancement wetland gauge data is compared to reference wetland gauge data in
growing seasons with less than normal rainfall. In periods of low rainfall, if a restoration gauge
hydroperiod exceeds the reference gauge hydroperiod, and both exceed five percent of the growing
season, then the gauge will be deemed successful. If a gauge location fails to meet these success criteria
in the seven year monitoring period, then monitoring may be extended, remedial actions may be
undertaken, or the limits of wetland restoration will be determined.
2.2 Vegetation Success Criteria
Specific and measurable success criteria for plant density within the wetland areas on the site follows
IRT Guidance. Vegetation monitoring plots are a minimum of 0.02 acres in size, and cover a minimum
of two percent of the planted area. Vegetation monitoring occurs annually in the fall of each year. The
measures of vegetative success for the site vary based on the planting zones outlined in the mitigation
plan.
The interim measures of vegetative success for the planted areas in the site is the survival of at least
320 planted three-year old trees per acre at the end of Year 3 and 260 five-year old trees per acre at the
end of Year 5. The final vegetative success criteria is the survival of 210 trees per acre at the end of
Year 7 of the monitoring period.
Survival is determined at the plot level, not averaged at the site level. No areas are planted with more
than 50 percent of one species comprising the total composition. In addition, planted vegetation should
show a general trend toward successful establishment of the target communities with vigor and height
growth. Specific height criteria are not specified due to the variability of species and site conditions.
2.3 Scheduling/Reporting
The Bank Sponsor follows the guidance document published by NC DMS, "Monitoring Requirements
and Performance Standards for Stream and/or Wetland Mitigation" dated November 7, 2011 and the
2003 USACE Stream Mitigation Guidelines. Due to the fact that this project is a private mitigation

Arrington Bridge HI WetlandMitigation Site • USGSHUC 03020201
Year 6 Monitoring Report- Wayne County, North Carolina • September 2021
bank and not an NC DMS project, monitoring documents follow DMS guidelines only to the extent
necessary for IRT approval. A monitoring report will be generated by December 31st of each
monitoring year documenting activities of the site, and submitted to the IRT. The monitoring program
is implemented to document system development and progress toward achieving the success criteria.
The monitoring program will be undertaken for seven years or until the final success criteria are
achieved, whichever is longer.
3 MONITORING PLAN
Annual monitoring data is reported using the IRT monitoring template. The monitoring report provides
a project data chronology that facilitates an understanding of project status and trends, research
purposes, and assists in decision making regarding project close-out. The success criteria for the
Arrington Bridge III site follows current accepted and approved success criteria presented in the North
Carolina Wetland Mitigation Guidelines, and subsequent agency guidance. Specific success criteria
components are presented in the table below. Monitoring reports will be prepared annually and
submitted to the IRT.
Monitoring Requirements
Required
Parameter
Fre uenc
Yes
Groundwater
Groundwater gauges
Quarterly
Groundwater monitoring gauges
Hydrology
distributed throughout the
with data recording devices will
site
be installed on site; the data will
be installed on site; the data will
be downloaded on a quarterly
basis during the growing season.
Yes
Vegetation
A representative coverage of
Semi-annual
Vegetation will be monitored
planted vegetation area.
using the Carolina Vegetation
Survey CVSprotocols
Yes
Exotic and Nuisance
Semi-annual
Locations of exotic and nuisance
Vegetation
vegetation will be mapped.
Yes
Project Boundary
Semi-annual
Locations of fierce damage,
vegetation damage, boundary
encroachments, etc. will be
mapped
Yes
Wetland Visual
Quarterly
Quarterly visual assessments
3.1 Visual Assessment Monitoring
Visual monitoring of all mitigation areas is conducted a minimum of twice per monitoring year by
qualified individuals. The visual assessments include vegetation density, vigor, invasive species, and
easement encroachments. Digital images are taken at fixed representative locations to record each
monitoring event, as well as any noted problem areas or areas of concern. Results of visual monitoring
are presented in a plan view exhibit with a brief description of problem areas and digital images.
Photographs are used to subjectively evaluate surface hydrology, success of vegetation, and
effectiveness of erosion control measures. A series of photos over time should indicate successional
maturation of vegetation.
3.2 Vegetation
Vegetation monitoring plots will be a minimum of 0.02 acres in size, and cover a minimum of two
percent of the planted area. The following data will be recorded for all trees in the plots: species, height,
planting date (or volunteer), and grid location. Monitoring occurs each year during the monitoring
period. Invasive and noxious species are monitored and controlled so that none become dominant or

Arrington Bridge HI WetlandMitigation Site • USGS HUC 03020201
Year 6 Monitoring Report- Wayne County, North Carolina • September 2021
alter the desired community structure of the site. If necessary, RES will develop a species -specific
control plan. Invasive and noxious species are monitored and controlled so that none become dominant
or alter the desired community structure of the site. Table 6 (Appendix B) provides a success summary
for each vegetation monitoring plot.
4 MAINTENANCE AND CONTINGENCY PLAN
All identified problematic areas or areas of concern such as wetland hydrology not meeting success
criteria, erosion/instability, aggradation/degradation, lack of targeted vegetation, and invasive/exotic
species which prevent the site from meeting performance success criteria will be evaluated on a case
by case basis. The USACE will be notified if monitoring or other information indicates that the Bank
Site, or a portion of a Bank Site, is not progressing as anticipated towards meeting the site specific
performance standards as defined in the Mitigation Plan. In such an event the USACE will be provided
with recommendations for adaptive management measures, which may include site modifications,
design changes, revisions to maintenance requirements, and revised monitoring requirements. USACE
approval will be obtained prior to conducting any adaptive management activities.
4.1 Wetlands
Any wetland problem areas which are identified during post construction monitoring activities are
documented and mapped on the Current Conditions Plan View (CCPV) as part of the annual monitoring
report. Wetland problem areas may include wetland hydrology not meeting success criteria. If it is
determined through IRT correspondence that remedial action is required to repair an area, a proposed
work plan will be submitted for remediation.
4.2 Vegetation
Any vegetation problem areas which are identified during post construction monitoring activities are
documented and mapped on the Current Conditions Plan View (CCPV) as part of the annual stream
monitoring report. Vegetation problem areas or areas of concern may include a vegetation plot not
meeting success criteria, invasive species abundance, sparse vegetation areas, etc. If it is determined
through IRT correspondence that remedial action is required to repair an area, a proposed work plan
will be submitted for remediation.
5 MONITORING YEAR 6 (MY6)
The Arrington Bridge III Mitigation Site Year 6 monitoring activities were performed throughout
2021 with the most recent activity at the end of August 2021. All required Year 6 monitoring data is
present below and in the appendices. Data presented shows the site has remained stable throughout
Year 6 and in general is on track to meeting vegetation and hydrology interim success criteria.
5.1 Year 6 Data Collection
5.1.1 Hydrology
Wetland hydrology is monitored with fifteen automatic recording pressure transducer gauges that have
been installed in representative locations across the wetland restoration areas. Two wetland hydrology
gauges were installed in reference wetland areas. An onsite rain gauge is also installed to document
rainfall events. Monitoring Year 6 wetland hydrology gauge data is documented in Table 9, Appendix
B. Year 6 wetland hydrology data show the site is performing as planned and is meeting targeted
wetland hydroperiods. During Year 6 wetland hydrology was monitored through August 18, 2021. All
15 wetland hydrology gauges met the hydrology success criteria of remaining continuously within 12

Arrington Bridge III WetlandMitigation Site • USGS HUC 03020201
Year 6 Monitoring Report- Wayne County, North Carolina • September 2021
inches of the soil surface for at least eight percent of the growing season (eight percent is approximately
21 days). Hydroperiods ranged from 19% to 64%. Recorded rainfall data shows the site was below
normal limits in April and May and above normal limits in January, February, June, and July (Table 8,
Appendix B). Reference Well 2 was destroyed during MY6 and will not be replaced due to the past
success of these gauges as well as the continued success of other gauges onsite.
5.1.2 Vegetation
Vegetation monitoring occurred on August 17-18th, 2021. Twenty-six of the 27 fixed vegetation plots
and five of the six random vegetation plots exceeded the interim success criteria, 210 stems per acre,
in Year 6. Planted stems per acre ranged from 121 to 1,012 with a mean of 486. Total stems per acre
ranged from 121 to 4,411 with a mean of 1,160. The average planted stem height across the entire site
was 6.7 feet which includes replanted stems. When averaging the necessary number of stems to meet
210 stems per acre, the average planted stem height is 8.2 feet. Vegetation Plot 6 and Random Plot 6
did not meet the interim success for planted stems; however, both plots seemed to be isolated and
contained fewer trees than their surrounding areas. Additionally, as discussed in the subsequent
paragraph of this report, both plots had high vegetative coverage. Vegetation Plot 6 was dominated by
desirable herbaceous vegetation which may have affected tree survivability. Given the conditions and
low expectations of additional survivability, RES believes these areas would not benefit from
supplemental planting at this time.
As requested by IRT during our site visit at the end of Monitoring Year 5, RES performed herbaceous
monitoring in Monitoring Year 6 at every vegetation plot. Herbaceous monitoring consisted of species
identification and percent coverage estimation within each plot. The goals of the herbaceous monitoring
were: 1) to evaluate if open water areas were prevalent on site and 2) to document herbaceous diversity
to supplement our understanding of the success of areas with low tree vigor/survival. Each plot had two
to seven herbaceous species and 21 species total were documented across all plots. The herbaceous
coverages averaged 94% and the median coverage was 95%. The lowest coverage percentage was 75%
in Plot 19; this plot has 486 stems per acre and is meeting all success criteria. All other plots had at
least 80% to 100% coverage. Plot 6, which did not meet success criteria for woody stems, had 100%
coverage of vegetation including Broadleaf arrowhead (Sagittaria latifolia), cattails (Typha latifolia),
tearthumb (Persicaria sagittata), soft rush (Juncus effusus), and sallow sedge (Carex lurida). Random
Plot 6, which also did not meet woody stem criteria, was dominated by Alligator weed (Alternanthera
philoxeroides) and include sallow sedge as well. The dryer plots documented more diversity than the
wetter plots. The wetter plots had less diversity but had high coverage and were dominated by either
Swamp smartweed (Persicaria hydropiperoides), Alligator weed, or tearthumb. No plot exhibited areas
of open water. Documented invasive species included Alligator weed and parrotfeather (Myriophyllum
aquaticum) and nuisance species included cattails. RES will treat cattails patches during the rest of the
monitoring period to reduce their presence onsite. The treatment of the other dominant invasive species
on -site would lead to unnecessary mortality of desirable species as well as an increase in open water
areas; therefore, RES will not treat the widespread aquatic invasives.
5.1.3 Photo Documentation
Permanent photo point locations are established at each vegetation plot by RES' staff. Any additional
problem areas or areas of concern will also be documented with a digital photograph during monitoring
activities. Digital photographs of the site's condition and vegetation plots can be found in Appendix B.
5.2 Adaptive Management
RES planted additional trees in March 2021 in and around Plots 6 and 7, and the open water areas near
Plot 4, Plot 10, and Plot 11. This supplemental planting totaled around 1.75 acres and consisted of 125

Arrington Bridge HI WetlandMitigation Site • USGS HUC 03020201
Year 6 Monitoring Report- Wayne County, North Carolina • September 2021
willow poles and 75 bald cypress container trees. The replanted area near Plot 4 was deemed successful
due to a random vegetation plot that was conducted within the area that met success criteria. In Plot 7,
the number of trees were consistent from the 2020 to 2021 monitoring year, and tree survival within
the plot now meets success criteria. However, replanting around Plots 6, 10, and 11 was not successful.
As mentioned above, the area near Plot 6 has abundant herbaceous growth as inventoried in this year's
report. The two low stem density/open water areas near Plots 10 and 11 remain open and trees have
failed in these areas numerous times despite multiple replanting events. The area near VP11 is 0.23
acres of wetland restoration and the area near VP10 is 0.17 acres of wetland enhancement (3:1). RES
anticipates reducing the site's final credit yield in Year 7 in coordination with the IRT to account for
these two areas.

Arrington Bridge HI WetlandMitigation Site • USGS HUC 03020201
Year 6 Monitoring Report- Wayne County, North Carolina • September 2021
6 REFERENCES
Amoroso, J.L., ed. 1999. Natural Heritage Program List of the Rare Plant Species of North Carolina. North
Carolina Natural Heritage Program, Division of Parks and Recreation, North Carolina Department of
Environment and Natural Resources. Raleigh, North Carolina.
Conner, W. H. and J. W. Day. (1976) Productivity and Composition of a Baldcypress-Water Tupelo Site and a
Bottomland Hardwood Site in a Louisiana Swamp. American Journal of Botany 63 (10): 1354-1364.
Cowardin, L.M., V. Carter, F.C. Golet and E.T. LaRoe. 1979. Classification of Wetlands and Deepwater
Habitats of the United States. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Office of Biological Services, FWS/OBS-79/31.
U.S. Department of the Interior, Washington, DC.
Environmental Laboratory. 1987. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual, Technical
Report Y-87-1. U.S. Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, Mississippi.
LeGrand, H.E., Jr. and S.P. Hall, eds. 1999. Natural Heritage Program List of the Rare Animal Species of
North Carolina. North Carolina Natural Heritage Program, Division of Parks and Recreation, North Carolina
Department of Environment and Natural Resources. Raleigh, North Carolina.
Peet, R.K, Wentworth, T.S., and White, P.S. (1998), A flexible, multipurpose method for recording vegetation
composition and structure. Castanea 63:262-274.
Radford, A.E., H.E. Ahles and F.R. Bell. 1968. Manual of the Vascular Flora of the Carolinas. The University
of North Carolina Press, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
Resource Environmental Solutions, LLC. 2015. Arrington Bridge III Wetland Mitigation Bank, Final
Mitigation Plan. WK Dickson & Co., Inc.
Resource Environmental Solutions, LLC. 2016. Arrington Bridge III Wetland Mitigation Site, Baseline
Monitoring Report
Schafale, M.P. and A.S. Weakley. 1990. Classification of the Natural Communities of North Carolina, Third
Approximation. North Carolina Natural Heritage Program, Division of Parks and Recreation, NCDENR,
Raleigh, NC.
US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), 2002. Regulatory Guidance Letter. RGL No. 02-2, December 24, 2002.
US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), 2013. April2003 NC Wetland Mitigation Guidelines.
United States Department of Agriculture (USDA), Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS), 1974. Soil
Survey of Wayne County, North Carolina.
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE). 2010. Regional Supplement to the Corps of Engineers Wetland
Delineation Manual: Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region (Version 2.0), ed. J. S. Wakeley, R. W. Lichvar,
and C. V. Noble. ERDC/EL TR-10-20. Vicksburg, MS: U.S. Army Engineer Research and Development Center.
United States Department of Agriculture (USDA), Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS), Web Soil
Survey; http://websoilsurvey.nres.usda.gov (September 2014)

Appendix A.
General Tables and Figures

Appendix A. General Tables and Figures
Table 1. Project Components and Mitigation Credits
Table 1. Project Components and Mitigation Credits
Arrington Bridge III Wetland Mitigation Site
DWR Project #
USACE Project # SAW-2015-00360
Mitigation Credits
Stream
Ri anan Wetland
Non-ri anan Wetland
Buffer
Nitrogen
Nutrient Offset
Phosphorous
Nutrient Offset
Type
R
RE
I
R
1
RE
R
RE
Totals
N/A
N/A
29.37
3.14
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Project Components
Project Component -or- Reach
ID
As -Built
Stationing/Location LF
Existing
Footage/Acreage
Approach
PI, PII etc.
Restoration -
or-
Restoration
Equivalent
Restoration
Footage or
Acreage
Mitigation
Ratio
SMUs with
Buffer
Multiplier
Component Summation
Restoration Level
Stream
(linear feet)
Riparian
Wetland Ac.
Non -riparian
Wetland
Buffer
(square feet)
Upland
(acres)
Riverine
Non-Riverine
Restoration
29.37
Enhancement
5.80
Enhancement 11
Enhancement- Low
6.07
Preservation
BMP Elements
Element
Location
Purpose/Function
Notes
BMP Elements
BR = Bioretention Cell; SF = Sand Filter; SW = Stormwater Wetland; WDP = Wet Detention Pond; DDP = Dry Detention Pond; FS = Filter Strip; S = Grassed
Swale; LS = Level Spreader; NI = Natural Infiltration Area, FB = Forested Buffer

Table 2. Project Activity and Reporting History
Project Activity and Reporting History
Arrington Bridge III Wetland Mitigation Site
DWR Project #
USACE Project # SAW-2015-00360
Activity or Report
Data Collection
Complete
Completion or
Delivery
Mitigation Plan
NA
September 2015
Final Design — Construction Plans
August 2015
August 2015
Construction Completed
May 2016
May 2016
Site Planting Completed
May 2016
May 2016
Baseline Monitoring Document Year 0 Monitoring — baseline
June 2016
July 2016
Year 1 Monitoring
December 2016
March 2017
Year 2 Monitoring
September 2017
September 2017
Year 3 Monitoring
September 2018
September 2018
Year 4 Monitoring
October 2019
October 2019
Year 5 Supplemental Planting
---
Aril 2020
Year 5 Monitoring
September 2020
Se tember 2020
Year 6 Monitoring
August 2021
September 2021
Year 7 Monitoring
Table 3. Project Contacts
Project Contacts Table
Arrington Bridge III Wetland Mitigation Site
DWR Project #
USACE Project # SAW-2015-00360
Designer
WK Dickson and Co., Inc.
720 Corporate Center Drive
Raleigh, NC 27607
[phone]
Frasier Mullen, PE
Construction Contractor
KBS Earthworks
5616 Coble Church Road
Julian, NC 27283
[phone]
Planting Contractor
H&J Forestry
Matt Hitch
Seeding Contractor
KBS Earthworks
5616 Coble Church Road
Julian, NC 27283
[phone]
Seed Mix Sources
Green Resource
Nursery Stock Suppliers
Arbogen, NC Forestry Services Nursery
Bank/Bank SponsorNeu-Con
Wetland and Stream Umbrella Bank
EBX Neuse I, LLC
3600 Glenwood Ave, Suite 100
Raleigh, NC 27612
Project Contact:
Brad Breslow ([e-mail])
Monitoring Performers
Resource Environmental Solutions, LLC
3600 Glenwood Ave, Suite 100
Raleigh, NC 27612
[phone]
ro'ect Manager:
Ryan Medric (rmedrickres.us )

Table 4. Project Information
Project Information
Project Name
Arrington Bridge III Wetland Mitigation Site
County
Wayne
Project Area (acres)
57.40
Project Coordinates (latitude and longitude)
35.342895°N-78.009907°W
Project Watershed Summary Information
Physiographic Province
Coastal Plain
River Basin
Neuse
USGS Hydrologic Unit 8-digit
03020201
USGS Hydrologic Unit 12-digit
03020201200040
DWQ Sub -basin
03-04-12
Project Drainage Area (acres)
403 Acres

ti
r
8�
4% ;Q
o �
a l Goldsboro
a Y -
m
a °
r �
Arrington Bridge III Site
O rr
�� l9
-c
} o D
s�
x'• (II
' f
C _ J
Legend
- Streams
- ABIII Easement
- Waterbody
HUC 03020201200040
Ir�7
rfh+
Y
s
12
k�
3
4
2
l;hn Rr
�L
Jo hIF50n
Fa Kr E,:
/ � ^'\� I\A \I
Sources: Esri, HERE, DeLorme, USGS, Intermap, incrementlP Corp.,
NR.CAN, Esri Japan, METI+, Esri China (Hong KongE.`rIN
i (Thailand),
TomTom, Mapmylndia, ©OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User
Cbrn,mn pity
Figure 1.
Resource Project Vicinity Map
Environmental Arrington Bridge III Site
Solutions 4
0 0.5 1 2 !WAYNE COUNTY
Miles Scale: NTS
1 inch = 1 miles

F
o
'aIL
3
o
vp
o
N O
p o
w v a
YO
`N II
7 O O to U
_rn }
u u '�-' u u m m
(7 W N u 0
w ooaaa" va" a""„ r eD,
LL C O) `
J Q v w w> w w
al
Vy'l E I m
S s,
.x
-
ZiT Irv".
El
46,
• (`Y
k i
a0'-
' o
N 7" M
l.. pp GG
a
vi
.Z
a
a �
,q
Y
v
itl
C
G
F

Appendix B.
Vegetation Data

Appendix B. Vegetation Tables
Table 5. Planted Species Summary
Scientific Name
Common Name
Species Type
Total Stems Planted
Asimina triloba
Pawpaw
Bare Root
500
Betula nigra
River Birch
Bare Root
2,650
Cephalanthus occidentalis
Common Buttonbush
Bare Root
500
Diospyros virginiana
Persimmon
Bare Root
800
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
Green Ash
Bare Root
3,200
Liriodendron tulipifera
Tuliptree
Bare Root
3,000
Nyssa aquatica
Water Tupelo
Bare Root
2,200
Nyssa b flora
Swamp Blackgum Tupelo
Bare Root
5,200
Platanus occidentalis
American sycamore
Bare Root
6,000
Quercus lyrata
Overcup Oak
Bare Root
5,300
Quercus michauxii
Swamp Chestnut Oak
Bare Root
8,500
Quercus nigra
Water Oak
Bare Root
6,050
Quercus phellos
Willow Oak
Bare Root
1,600
Taxodium distichum
Bald Cypress
Bare Root
3,200
Total
48,700
Supplemental Planted Species Summary (April 2020)
Species
Type
Size (ft)
Amount
Bald cypress
Whip
4
750
Water tupelo
Bareroot
2
150
Green ash
Whip
4
500
Black willow
Livestake
3
750
Buttonbush
Livestake
3
500
Black willow
Pole
6
50
Whip Total
1,400
Livestake/Pole Total
1,300
Grand Total
2,700

Appendix B. Vegetation Tables
Table 6. Vegetation Plot Mitigation Success Summary
Plot #
Planted
Stems/Acre
Volunteer
Stems/Acre
Total
Stems/Acre
Success
Criteria
Met?
Average
Stem
Height (ft)
1
607
40
647
Yes
9.9
2
931
1700
2630
Yes
12.0
3
486
0
486
Yes
12.0
4
769
0
769
Yes
2.7
5
728
0
728
Yes
5.1
6
121
0
121
No
4.4
7
243
971
1214
Yes
6.1
8
526
526
1052
Yes
6.2
9
688
1012
1700
Yes
5.4
10
647
526
1174
Yes
5.2
11
283
405
688
Yes
3.7
12
647
1862
2509
Yes
10.5
13
567
0
567
Yes
10.2
14
607
2833
3440
Yes
5.2
15
324
4087
4411
Yes
12.6
16
607
2064
2671
Yes
11.7
17
567
526
1093
Yes
11.1
18
405
0
405
Yes
3.7
19
486
0
486
Yes
5.4
20
647
607
1255
Yes
1.6
21
486
0
486
Yes
7.0
22
1012
2630
3642
Yes
4.1
23
486
728
1214
Yes
11.4
24
486
324
809
Yes
6.1
25
324
0
324
Yes
4.1
26
405
1416
1821
Yes
2.3
27
364
0
364
Yes
3.0
R1
283
0
283
Yes
5.9
R2
324
0
324
Yes
4.5
R3
283
0
283
Yes
4.5
R4
243
0
243
Yes
5.3
R5
243
0
243
Yes
5.1
R6
202
0
202
No
5.7
Project Avg
486
674
1153
Yes
6.7

1■1■11■1■11■1■111��11
1�1�11�1�11�1�111
1�
�1����1��������II����
�■�■��■�■n■'■n���ta
iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii
i�
iiiiii�iiiiiii�ii
i1
iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii
i�
;:�:;;:;:;;:;:,�'31��
,.,.,,.,.,,.�.,,,��,o
tiititiititiititiii
1lIII
I
IIII
III
IIII
I
I
Illlll
i�:;;:;:;;:;:,':;:�0:
I'e����e��e�e��e��
���
:;;:;E;;:;E;�E;:�I:
I:..:.:..:.:.':.:�I:
I:,�:;:;;:;:,':;:31:
IEE;;E;E;;:;:,,E;:�I:
I:,�:;:;;:;:;;:;:il:
:;;E;:;;E;:;;:;E�I�
�itiititiititiitit
1!
IIIIII
III
Il

I;;;;;;;;;;;�;II'1
I;;,";;;;;;�;II'o
I;;,";;;;;;�;II"
I;;;;;;;,�,;�;II'�
I;;;;;;;;;;;�;II'�
I;;,";;;;;;�;II"
E;;;;;;;,";�;II"
��������������e���
I...'....'..=;11'�
liiiiiiiiiii=illii
I,�,;;;;,�,;�oll'�
1111
III
��
lo��ll
��
Ill�i@
�;11�1
l•�����"��������o'�•iillii
;�Il�o
ti
i
.
11

E
z
w
m m
=
E 3
> E
E
` o
X
Eo
Y
3 Y
S
m o
Y
0
> E
o
E
3
E
a
E
w
c
N
o
j
X
c 3 E w =
3 r v 3
> E = E m`
n
in asff
X
E
z E
m E 3 Y 3 m 3
> E
E
V � n
F � O
X
E
z
Y
'
E
E
�>"
o
E
3
E
3
�
�
c
Em
z
E 3
@
0 3
2
x
> o
3 Y
m E
3
3
=
E
3 E
w
`
U
X
>> E
3
—
E
c
E
X
E
z
I
v
E
a of
> o
3 Y
o
m 3
Y
3
E
z
A
g i n
0
N
i
X
E
z
3
Y
=
m 3
E
�j
3
x
e
E
_
3
o
°
m
z
E m
C
=
° 3
m m
E
m
°
E
v o
>
EO
3
3
E
z
o a
0
m
c
E
> o
E
X
E
01
m
m
> E
3
Y
E
3 E
E
X
E
-O
> E
¢
Q `a
X
E
m
m
> E
¢
sQ
Q
m°
X
E
z
E
Z
m
w
o
n
'ff
CU
o

§§
E
)
—
m�!cro�
!
m|Em:
[
_
—
:
\
\
o
!
!
[
r`
[
§E
Ĩ/\`/
$

Appendix B. Vegetation Plot Photos
Appendix B.
Arrington Bridge III Vegetation Plot Photos (NIY6 2021)
Vegetation Plot 1(8/17/2021)
Vegetation Plot 3 (8/17/2021)
Vegetation Plot 5 (8/17/2021)
Vegetation Plot 2 (8/17/2021)
Vegetation Plot 4 (8/17/2021)
Vegetation Plot 6 (8/17/2021)

MVMI VA
_ 7
f

Appendix B. Vegetation Plot Photos
Vegetation Plot 13 (8/18/2021)
Vegetation Plot 15 (8/18/2021)
Vegetation Plot 17 (8/18/2021)
Vegetation Plot 14 (8/18/2021)
Vegetation Plot 16 (8/18/2021)
Vegetation Plot 18 (8/18/2021)

Appendix B. Vegetation Plot Photos
Vegetation Plot 19 (8/18/2021)
Vegetation Plot 21 (8/18/202 1)
Vegetation Plot 23 (8/18/2021)
Vegetation Plot 20 (8/18/2021)
Vegetation Plot 22 (8/18/2021)
Vegetation Plot 24 (8/18/2021)

Appendix B. Vegetation Plot Photos
Vegetation Plot 25 (8/18/2021)
Vegetation Plot 27 (8/18/2021)
Vegetation Plot 26 (8/18/2021)

Appendix B. Vegetation Plot Photos
Random Vegetation Plot 1 (8/18/2021)
Random Vegetation Plot 3 (8/18/2021)
Random Vegetation Plot 5 (8/18/2021)
Random Vegetation Plot 2 (8/18/2021)
Random Vegetation Plot 4 (8/18/2021)
Random Vegetation Plot 6 (8/18/2021)

Appendix B. Vegetation Plot Photos
Arrington Bridge III General Conditions Photos
Planting area near RVP 1 (8/17/2021)
Open water area near VP11 (8/17/2021)
Planting area near VP10 (8/17/2021)
Beaver dam near VP11 (3/11/2021)

Appendix C.
Hydrology Data

Table 8. 2021 Rainfall Summary
Month
Average
Normal Limits
Goldsboro
Station
30 Percent
70 Pe rce nt
January
4.64
3.56
5.37
5.97
February
3.67
2.47
4.28
5.86
March
4.55
3.28
5.53
4.87
April
3.45
2.15
4.31
1.33
May
3.87
2.65
4.83
2.64
June
4.03
2.51
4.94
11.63
July
5.34
3.51
6.38
7.55
August
5.52
3.49
6.34
5.78
September
5.57
2.43
7.40
---
October
3.10
1.99
4.39
---
Novem ber
1 3.01
1.94
3.65
---
Decem ber
3.44
2.28
4.25
---
Total
50.19
32.26
1 61.67
45.63
Ahnva Nnrmal I imitc �Qrmal Limits
Notes:
NCSCO - KGSB Seymour -Johnson AFB Airport
Table 9.
2021 Max Hydroperiod (Growing Season 4-Mar through 21-Nov, 262 days)
Well Data for March 4, 2021 thru August 17, 2021
Success Criterion 8%
Gauge
Consecutive
Cumulative
1 Occurrences
Days
0
Percent of
growing
Season
Days
0
Percent of
growing
Season
AW1
49
19%
109
42%
10
AW2
167
64%
167
64%
1
AW3
1 81
31%
161
61%
4
AW4
167
64%
167
64%
1
AW5
80
30%
159
61%
4
AW6
167
64%
167
64%
1
AW7
167
64%
167
64%
1
AW8
79
30%
157
60%
3
AW9
167
64%
167
64%
1
AW10
167
64%
167
64%
1
AW11
167
64%
167
64%
1
AW12
167
64%
167
64%
1
AW13
167
64%
167
64%
1
AW14
167
64%
167
64%
1
AW15
167
64%
167
64%
1
REFAWI
167
64%
167
64%
1
REFAW2
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A

Table 10.
Summary of Groundwater Monitoring Results
Arrington B ride III
Gauge ID
Percent of Growing Season; Success Criteron 8%
Year 1
(2016)
Year 2
(2017)
Year 3
(2018)
Year 4
(2019)
Year 5
(2020)
Year 6
(2021)
Year 7
(2022)
AWl
18%
10%
5%
21°
13%
19
AW2
12%
71%
43%
49%
67%
64%
AW3
38%
59%
39%
49%
67%
31%
AW4
31%
71%
41%
81%
67%
64%
AW5
31%
59%
44%
35%
67%
30%
AW6
43%
59%
42%
49%
67%
64%
AW7
31%
71%
44%
46%
67%
64%
AW8
24%
50%
39%
30%
57%
30%
AW9
24%
71%
41%
81%
67%
64%
AW10
26%
57%
40%
46%
67%
64%
AW11
31%
58%
41%
49%
67%
64%
AW12
31%
71%
43%
35%
67%
64%
AW13
31%
18%
41%
32%
67%
64%
AW14
31%
55%
45%
30%
57%
64%
AW15
18%
59%
24%
49%
67%
64%
REFAWI
31%
59%
43%
81%
67%
64%
REFAW2
17%
19%
22%
24%
22%
N/A

(sayoui) uoijejidioaad
O O O O O O O
CO Ln � M N O O O O O O O O O O O
� 7.WZ/
�Z/M/
6 7.WU
Q
6Z/6/6
CD6
('
ZW9
L
6 ZWIL
6 ZW9
O
C7
6Z/6/S ;
Q
T
A\
YW}�/
�zWt
O
a
N
O
�
L
m
6 ZWC
I
O
6Z/6/Z
i
L
L
6Z/6/6
Q
N
CDOZ/6/Z6
N
OZ/6/66
OZ/1/01
OZ/ 6 /6
0 0 0 o CDo 0 0 0
It coN N co
(sayoui) u01jena13 aalempunoa�
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
N
N_
C
0
N
R
G1
I
rn
3
o
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
c
0
� c
�o
� N
I
3
0
c�

(sayoui) uoijejidioaad
O O O O O O O
CO Ln � M N O CD CD CD CD CD CD CD CD CD O
� 71 � 6 V M N O
� 7.WZ/
�Z/M/
N
6 ZWU
Q
6Z/6/6
6 ZW9
('
L
N

(sayoui) uoijejidioaad
O O O O O O O
CO Ln � M N O O O O O O O O O O O
� 7.WZ/
�Z/M/
M
6 ZWU
Q
6Z/6/6
('
o

(sayoui) uoijejidioaad
O O O O O O O
CO Ln � M N O O O O O O O O O O O
� 7.WZ/
�Z/M/
6 ZWU
Q
6Z/6/6
6 ZW9
('
cn
6 ZWIL
M
6 ZW9
O
C7
6Z/6/S ;
Q
T
A\
6 zWtl
O
a
N
M
IF
O
�
L
m
6 ZWC
I
6Z/6/Z
i
L
L
6Z/6/6
Q
N
OZ/6/Z6
p
N
OZ/6/I I
y

(sayoui) uoijejidioaad
O O O O O O O
CO Ln � M N O O O O O O O O O O O
� 7.WZ/
�Z/M/
LO
6Z/6/06
Q
IZ/1/6
6 ZW9
('
cn
6 ZWL
3
6 ZW9
O
C7
6Z/6/S ;
Q
T
A\
6 zWtl
O
a
N
O
�
L
m
6 ZWC
I
O
4-0
6Z/6/Z
i
L
L
6Z/6/6
Q
N
OZ/6/Z6
p
N
OZ/6/I I
OZ/6/06
:IL
-� OZ/ 6 /6
0 0 0 o O o 0 0 0
It coN N M IT(sayoui)
u01jena13 aalempunoa!D
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
N
O
N
I
I
a�
I
I
�
c
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
c
o
I
in �
c N
I
I
O
(7
I
I

(sayoui) uoijejidioaad
O O O O O O O
CO Ln � M N O O O O O O O O O O O
� 7.WZ/
�Z/M/
6 ZWU
Q
IZ/1/6
('
o

(sayoui) uoijejidioaad
O O O O O O O
CO Ln � M N O O O O O O O O O O O
� 7.WZ/
�Z/M/
6 ZWU
Q
6Z/6/6
6 ZW9
('
L
6 ZWIL
'3

(sayoui) uoijejidioaad
O O O O O O O
CO Ln � M N O O O O O O O O O O O
� 7.WZ/
�Z/M/
co
6 ZWU
Q
6Z/6/6
6 ZW9
('
L
6 ZWL
3
6 ZW9
O
C7
6Z/6/SAl ;
Q
T
A\
YW}�/
�Z/�/V
O
a
N
M
O
�
L
m
6 ZWC
I
O
6Z/6/Z
c
i
�L
L
6Z/6/6
Q
N
OZ/6/Z6
p
N
OZ/6/I I
OZ/6/06
OZ/ 6 /6
0 0 0 o O o 0 0 0
V co N N co
(sayoui) u01jena13 aalempunoa�
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
N
o
N
I
I
N
�
I
I
c
�3
o
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
o
I
yo
�o
� N
I
I
o
c7
I
I

(sayoui) uoijejidl3aad
O O O O O O O
CO Ln � M N O O O O O O O O O O O
� 7.WZ/
�Z/M
6 ZWU
Q
6Z/6/6
6 ZW9
('
L
6 ZWIL
a
M
a
6 ZW9
O
C7
6Z/6/S ;
Q
T
A\
YW}�/
�zWtIF
O
a
N
O
�
L
m
6 ZWC
I
O
6Z/6/Z
i
L
L
6Z/6/6
Q
N
CDOZWZ6
N
OZ/M/
OZWU
OZ/ 6 /6
co
C) OV CD CD CD co (NN O
(sayOui) u01jena13 aalempunoa�
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
N
o
N
I
I
N
�
I
I
c
�3
0
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
c
0
ino
c N
I
I
O
c9
I
I

(sayoui) uoijejidl3aad
O O O O O O O O O
� 7.WZ/
�Z/M/
CD
6 ZWU
Q
IZ/1/6
6 ZW9
L
6 ZWL
3
6 ZW9
O
7
6zn/S
c
('
R
�
T
IQ
G4
6zn/t
♦./�
a
-moo
M
7
�L
6Z/6/E
Im
i
6Z/6/Z
i
.i
6Z/6/6
Q
N
OZ/6/Z6
CDCMOZ/6/66
OZ/6/06
IF
OZ/ 6 /6
C) C) OV CD CD CD N O
(sayOui) u01jena13 aalempunoa�
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
N
O
N
I
I
a�
N
I
I
�
c
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
c
0
yo
Imoo
C EtI
I
o
c�
I
I

(sayoui) uoijejidl3aad
O O O O O O O O O O o
O O O O O O O O O O O
N m w Il_ M Ln -It M N — O
� 7.WZ/
�Z/M
r
6 ZWU
Q
IZ/1/6
6 ZW9
L
6 ZWL 3
m
6 ZW9
7
O
6Z/6/S
('
�
Q
T
G�
6Z/6/�
♦./�
m
-moo
�L
/6/
6ZE
Im
i
6Z/6/Z
i
.i
6Z/6/6
Q
N OZ/6/Z6
CD
N
OZ/6/66
OZ/1/01
OZ/ 6 /6
C) C) OV CD CD CD N CD O)
(sayOui) u01jena13 aalempunoa�
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
o
N
I
I
N
�
N
I
I
c
.3
o
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
c
o
I
ino
c N
I
I
O
c9
I
I

(sayoui) uoi}e}idioaad
O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O
M N O 6� 00 Ih (O Ln (M N O O O O O O O O O O O
N N N N N m w I— CO Lo "t M N O
6Z/6/Z6
6Z/6/66
N
6Z/6/06
r
Q
6Z/6/6
r�
o
N
c

(sayoui) uoijejidioaad
O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O
� M N O � M N O O O O O O O O O O O
N N N N N � m M Il- CD Ln V M N O
6ZWZ6
6Z/M/
M
6 ZWU
Q
6Z/6/6
6 ZW9
L
6 ZWL
3
6 ZW9
O
6Z/6/S
c
('
�
Q
T
G�
6 zWtl
♦./
a
-moo
L
6Z/6/E
I
m
i
A
6Z/6/Z
i
.i
6Z/6/6
Q
N
OZ/6/Z6
CD
CMOZ/6/66
OZ/6/06
OZ/ 6 /6
O O CD CD0 o O
m Ih Ln M M
(sayoui) uoijena13 aalempunoa�
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
N
O
N
I
I
a�
N
I
I
�
c
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
c
0
CA�
c N
I
I
I
I
I
O
(7

(sayoui) uoijejidioaad
O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O
A M IN",O O W O �
N N N N N � � � � � 1m a0 Il— O LO It M N O
6ZWZ6
6Z/M/
6 ZWU
Q
IZ/1/6
6 ZW9
L
6 ZWL 3
6 ZW9
7
O
6zn/S
c
('
�
Q
T
G�
6Z/6/tlIF
♦./
a
-moo
L
6Z/6/E
Im
i
6Z/6/Z
i
.i
6Z/6/6
Q
N
OZ/6/Z6
O
N
OZ/M
y
IMo
N

(sayoui) uoijejidl3aad
O O O O O O O
CO Ln � M N O O O O O O O O O O O
� 7.WZ/
�Z/M
.. AA
Y/
6 ZWU
Q
IZ/1/6
6 ZW9
L
6 ZWL
3
6 Zn /9
O
6ZWS
('
;
R
�
Q
T
6Z/6/t
m
�o
L
6Z/6/E
Im
i
6Z/6/Z
i
.i
6Z/M
Q
N
OZWZ6
O
N
OZ/M/
OZWU
OZ/ 6 /6
co
C) OV CD CD CD N O
(sayOui) u01jena13 aalempunoa!D
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
N
O
N
I
I
a�
N
I
I
�
c
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
c
0
yo
rno
C N
I
I
o
c�
I
I

(sayoui) uoijejidioaad
O O O O O O O
CO Ln � M N O O O O O O O O O O O
� 7.WZ/
�Z/M
r
Q 6 ZWU
LL
W
6Z/6/6
6 ZW9
6 ZWL
w
6 ZW9
OL 6zn/S w
6zn/t o
d°
fla
V/ o
L 6 ZWC I
m
6 ZWZ
O
6Z/6/6
L
L
Q
OZ/ 6/Z I•
N
O
N
OZ/6/66
OZ/6/06
OZ/ 6 /6
0 0 0 o O o 0 0 0
It coN N co(sayoui) u01jena13 aalempunoa!D
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
N
O
N
I
I
a�
I
I
�
c
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
c
o
I
cn c
c N
I
I
O
c9
I
I