20061421 Ver 1_401 Application_20060906

~X,p ~ ~ - ~ ~~~
~~ Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
11010 Raven Ridge Road Raleigh, North Carolina 27614 Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
www.SandEC.com September 14, 2006
S&EC Project # 10409.W2
To: US Army Corps of Engineers
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
Attn: Jamie Shern
6508 Falls of the Neuse Rd, Suite 120
Raleigh, N.C. 27615
NC Division of Water Quality
401 Oversight and Express Permits Unit
Attn: Lia MyotUCynthia Van Der Wiele
2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250
Raleigh, NC 27604-2260
From: Debbie Edwards
Soil & Environmental Consultants, P.A.
11010 Raven Ridge Road ~
Raleigh, NC 27614
~~Q~~~
Q ~a~

Re: Middle Creek Commons-EXPRESS REVIEW PROGRAM G~'~~~ gT'~z= ~~"~ ,
Clayton, Johnston County, NC
On behalf of the owner, Elizabeth T. Barber, please find attached a complete application and supplemental information
requesting written concurrence from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USAGE) and the North Carolina Division of
Water Quality (NC-DWQ) that the activities proposed below may procede utilizing Nationwide Permits 39 & 12 and
Water Quality Certifications 3402 & 3374. Please contact me at [phone] if you have any questions or require
additional information.
PROJECT SUMMARY
Project Name Middle Creek Commons
Project T e Commercial Subdivision
Owner / A licant Re enc Centers
Coun Johnston
Nearest Town Cla on
Waterbod Name UT to Middle Creek
Basin /Sub-basin 03-04-03
Index Number 27-43-15- 4
Class C; NSW
IMPACT SUMMARY
Stream Impact (acres): 0
Wetland Impact (acres): 0.470
Open Water Impact (acres): 0
Total Impact to Waters of the U.S. (acres): 0.470
Total Stream Impact (linear feet): 0
Attachments:
Pre-construction Notification (PCN) Application Form
Agent Authorization
USGS Vicinity Map
Wake County Soil Survey
URS letter to USAGE (dated July 20, 2006)
URS letter to NCDWQ (dated August 28, 2006)
DWQ Buffer Detennination letter (dated September 5, 2006)
EEP Acceptance letter (dated September 6, 2006)
Express Review Acceptance letter (dated August 31, 2006)
USAGE signed Jurisdictional Determination Map
Storm Drainage Calculations, including Level Spreader Worksheets -& Extended Detention Wetland Worksheet
Operations and Maintenance Agreement (signed and notarized)
Existing Conditions Map
Overall Layout Plan Map
Overall Stonn Drainage Map & BMP Detail Map
$1,000.00 Water Quality CertiScation Fee
Charlotte Office: Greensboro Office:
236 LePhillip Court, Suite C 3817-E Lawndale Drive
Concord, NC 28025 Greensboro, NC 27455
Phone: [phone] Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone] Fax: [phone]

~„ _ _
Office Use Only: Form Version March OS
USACE Action ID No. DWQ No. ~~ ~~ ` ~~2 ~
(If any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/A".)
I. Processing
1. Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
® Section 404 Permit ^ Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
^ Section 10 Permit ^ Isolated Wetland Permit from DWQ
® 401 Water Quality Certification ® Express 401 Water Quality Certification
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: 39 & 12
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here: ^
4. If payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) is proposed
for mitigation of impacts, attach the acceptance letter from NCEEP, complete section VIII,
and check here:
5. If your project is located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on page
4), and the project is within a North Carolina Division of Coastal Mana e
Environmental Concern (see the top of page 2 for further details), the `;`',! ~,'~?~
j=.
II. Applicant Information ~ ~ i~ 14 2.0(16
..
1. Owner/Applicant Information ~4 ~ ~~~ ~x~„.ant F~ r;~,a,~c~t
Name: Elizabeth T. Barber c/o Regency Centers~Attn: David Smith
Mailing Address: 101 Maynard Crossing Court, Suite 211
Card NC 27513
Telephone Number: 919-466-1500 Fax Number: 919-469-9883
E-mail Address: dsmith(c~r~,regencycenters.com
2. Agent/Consultant Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter
must be attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name: Debbie Edwards
Company Affiliation: Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
Mailing Address: 11010 Raven Ridge Road
Raleigh, NC 27614
Telephone Number: 919-846-5900 Fax Number: 919-846-9467
E-mail Address: dedwardsna,sandec.com
Page 1 of 9

III. Project Information
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USAGE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of project: Middle Creek Commons
2. T.I.P. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only): n/a
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN): 1616-79-0505
4. Location
County: Johnston Nearest Town: Clayton
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number): Middle Creek Commons
Directions to site (include road numbers/names, landmarks, etc.): The subject site is located
within the southwest quadrant of NC Hi lg iwa~50 and NC Hi way 42.
Site coordinates (For linear projects, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that
separately lists the coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
Decimal Degrees (6 digits minimum): 35.5918 °N 78.6006 °W
6. Property size (acres): 13.9 acres
7. Name of nearest receiving body of water: UT to Middle Creek 27-43-15-(42, C; NSW
8. River Basin: Neuse (03-04-03)
(Note -this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/admin/maps/.)
9. Describe the existing conditions on the site and general land use in the vicinity of the project
at the time of this application: This site has been logged within the last 10 years, therefore
a substantial amount of undergrowth is nresent. There are also 3 vacant dwellings located
along NC Hwy 42. The general land use in the vicinity of the property is mixed residential,
agricultural and forested.
Page 2 of 9

10. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
The proposed project is for a commercial development with impacts resulting from the
installation of a commercial buildin (g~Qrocery stored the stormwater piping {utilities for the
constructed wetland and the stormwater outlet/level spreader for the constructed wetland.
Heav~quipment typically used for construction and excavation will be employed for this
project.
11. Explain the purpose of the proposed work: The purpose of the proposed work is to supply a
commercial shopping area for the existing residential area.
IV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules.
Prior to S&EC's involvement, Mr. Ray Bode of URS Corporation completed the wetland
delineation and Neuse Buffer evaluation. As stated in a letter sent to Mr. Jamie Shern dated July
20 2006 Mr Shern and Mr Bode conducted a site visit on June 1 2006 to confirm
jurisdictional wetlands and waters on site (see attached As a result of this site visit on June 1,
2006, the jurisdictional determination has been si ir~y Mr. Shern and is attached (Action ID
2006-40446-251). As stated in an additional letter sent to Mr. Mike Horan dated Au sum
2006, Mr. Horan and Mr. Bode conducted a site visit on May 30, 2006 to confirm Neuse
Riparian Buffers and isolated wetlands (see attached). The Neuse buffer determination letter is
attaced (NBR# 06-2151.
V. Future Project Plans
Are any future permit requests anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated work,
and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application.
No additional permits are anticipated at this time.
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. Each impact must be
listed separately in the tables below (e.g., culvert installation should be listed separately from
riprap dissipater pads). Be sure to indicate if an impact is temporary. All proposed impacts,
permanent and temporary, must be listed, and must be labeled and clearly identifiable on an
accompanying site plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial)
should be shown on a delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems.
Page 3 of 9

Wetland and stream evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate.
Photographs maybe included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for
wetland or stream mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional
space is needed for listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
1. Provide a written description of the proposed impacts:
The ,proposed permanent impacts include 0.444 acre of jurisdictional wetlands for lot fill
f impact 1) and 0.014 acres of jurisdictional wetlands for a BMP outlet & level spreader
(impact 3). The proposed temporary impacts include 0.012 acre of jurisdictional wetlands
for stormwater pipin utilities (impact 2).
2. Individually list wetland impacts. Types of impacts include, but are not limited to
mechanized clearing, grading, fill, excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams,
separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding.
Wetland Impact Type of Wetland Located within Distance to Area of
Site Number Type of Impact (e.g., forested, marsh, 100-year
Floodplain Nearest
Stream Impact
(acres)
(indicate on map) herbaceous, bog, etc.) ( es/no linear feet)
Impact 1 permanent-Lot fill Forested Headwater No 100' 0.444
(NWP 39) Wetlands
Impact 2 Temporary-Stormwater Forested Headwater No 250' 0.012
(NWP 12) piping-Utility Wetlands
Impact 3 Permanent-BMP outlet Forested Headwater No ~60' 0.014
(NWP 39) & Level Spreader Wetlands
Total Wetland Impact (acres) 0.470
3. List the total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property: 1.641 acres
4. Individually list all intermittent and perennial stream impacts. Be sure to identify temporary
impacts. Stream impacts include, but are not limited to placement of fill or culverts, dam
construction, flooding, relocation, stabilization activities (e.g., cement walls, rip-rap, crib
walls, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is proposed,
plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams
must be included. To calculate acreage, multiply length X width, then divide by 43,560.
Stream Impact
Perennial or Average Impact Area of
Number Stream Name Type of Impact Stream Width Length Impact
indicate on ma Intermittent? Before Im act linear feet acres
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Total Stream Impact (by length and acreage) N/A N/A
5. Individually list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries, sounds, Atlantic
Ocean and any other water of the U.S.). Open water impacts include, but are not limited to
fill, excavation, dredging, flooding, drainage, bulkheads, etc.
Page 4 of 9

Open Water Impact
Name of Waterbody Type of Waterbody Area of
Site Number (if applicable) Type of Impact (lake, pond, estuary, sound, bay, Impact
(indicate on ma) ocean, etc.) (acres
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Total Open Water Impact (acres) N/A
6. List the cumulative im act to all Waters of the U.S. resultin from the ro'ect:
Stream Im act (acres): 0
Wetland Im act (acres): 0.470
O en Water Impact (acres): 0
Total Impact to Waters of the U.S. (acres) 0.470
Total Stream Impact (linear feet): 0
7. Isolated Waters
Do any isolated waters exist on the property? ®Yes ^ No
Describe all impacts to isolated waters, and include the type of water (wetland or stream) and
the size of the proposed impact (acres or linear feet). Please note that this section only
applies to waters that have specifically been determined to be isolated by the USAGE.
There is a portion of an isolated wetland located on the southern nronertv boundarv of
the project site however there are no impacts proposed to this isolated wetland feature. The
amount of the isolated wetland that is located within the property boundaries is 0.003 acre.
8. Pond Creation
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ^ uplands ^ stream ^ wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.): N/A
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.): N/A
Current land use in the vicinity of the pond: N/A
Size of watershed draining to pond: N/A Expected pond surface area: N/A
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It maybe useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts.
Impact #1 is a proposed Qrocerv store. this building has been shifted as far east and as far
south as the site would allow. The 20' wide drivewav in the rear of the rg ocery store is required
to meet fire code. In addition, the truck turnaround areas which are normally required in the rear
Page 5 of 9

of a commercial building have been eliminated to minimize the proposed wetland impacts as
much as possible. Impact #2 is the result of the proposed stormwater piping needed to route the
stormwater from the uplands to the proposed stormwater BMP (constructed wetland). This
piping has been located as far north as possible to minimize the proposed wetland impacts but
also keeping the utilities from under HwX 42. Impact #3 is the result of the proposed outlet
structure and level spreader for the constructed wetland. Accordin tg o the project engineer, this
outlet structure is located within the wetland because the site is fairly flat, and the stormwater
.piping system required large diameter pipes at flat slopes with minimum cover to establish the
elevation of the BMP pond. The outlet pipe has been raised as hi as possible and even with
all of the above measures; the vertical fall of this pipe is deficient in order to daylight outside of
the existing wetland and avoid these impacts. The level spreader is needed to diffuse the flow
for the 1 year storm from the outfall of the constructed wetland to prevent future erosion.
VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on January 15, 2002, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCEEP concurrence shall be placed on hold as incomplete.
An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration in DWQ's
Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
http://h2o. enr.state. nc.us/ncwetlands/strm gide.html.
1. Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
Page 6 of 9

__ In conversation with Jamie Shern of the USACE, he requests a 2:1 mitigation ratio for the
proposed permanent impacts to wetlands (0.458 x 2 = 0.916) The applicant proposes
payment to the Ecosystem Enhancement Pro rg_am (EEP) for the proposed permanent impacts
to wetlands; a copy of the EEP Acceptance letter is attached.
2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement
Program (NCEEP). Please note it is the applicant's responsibility to contact the NCEEP at
[phone] to determine availability, and written approval from the NCEEP indicating
that they are will to accept payment for the mitigation must be attached to this form. For
additional information regarding the application process for the NCEEP, check the NCEEP
website at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/wrp/index.htm. If use of the NCEEP is proposed, please
check the appropriate box on page five and provide the following information:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet): 0
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet): 0
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): 0
Amount ofNon-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): 0.0458
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres): 0
IX. Environmental Documentation (required by DWQ)
1. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of
public (federal/state) land? Yes ^ No
2. If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ^ No ^
3. If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please
attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter. Yes ^ No ^
X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (required by DWQ)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
1. Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233
(Meuse), 15A NCAC 2B .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 02B .0243 (Catawba) 15A NCAC
Page 7 of 9

2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please
identify )? Yes ^ No
2. If "yes", identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers.
If buffer mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the
buffer multipliers.
Impact C-Road Widening
Zone* Impact
s uare feet Multiplier Required
Miti ation
1 N/A 3 (2 for Catawba) N/A
2 N/A 1.5 N/A
Total N/A N/A
* Zone 1 extends out 30 feet perpendicular from the top of the near bank of channel; Zone 2 extends an
additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
3. If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e.,
Donation of Property, Riparian Buffer Restoration /Enhancement, or Payment into the
Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as identified
within 15A NCAC 2B .0242 or .0244, or .0260.
There are no impacts proposed to the Neuse River Buffers. therefore mitigation is not
be required.
XI. Stormwater (required by DWQ)
Describe impervious acreage (existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site. Discuss
stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands downstream from
the property. If percent impervious surface exceeds 20%, please provide calculations
demonstrating total proposed impervious level.
The percent impervious for the entire proiect is calculated to be 68% (see attached Storm
Draina~?e Calculations~pplicant is proposing a constructed wetland to treat the onsite
stormwater, the extended detention wetland worksheet, level spreader worksheet and signed and
notarized Operations and Maintenance Agreements are attached, along with the Storm Drainage
Calculations package, the Overall Storm Drainage Plan (sheet C2.2) and BMP Details (sheet
XII. Sewage Disposal (required by DWQ)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
The proposed project will tie into existin sg anitary sewer lines in the area.
XIII. Violations (required by DWQ)
Page 8 of 9

Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ^ No
Is this an after-the-fact permit application? Yes ^ No
XIV. Cumulative Impacts (required by DWQ)
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in additional
development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality? Yes ^ No
If yes, please submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with
the most recent North Carolina Division of Water Quality policy posted on our website at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands. If no, please provide a short narrative description:
We have reviewed the "DRAFT Internal Policy, Cumulative impacts and the 401 Water OualitX
Certification and Isolated Wetland Programs" document prepared by the NC Division of Water
Quality on October 3, 2002, version 1.6. The draft states that most small commercial
developments are unlikely to cause cumulative impacts. Middle Creek Commons does not meet
anv of the three criteria of private projects that can clearly result in cumulative impacts. We
anticipate that you will advise us if a qualitative or quantitative impact analysis is required.
XV. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).
Page 9 of 9
Applicant/Agent's Signature Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)

Sev.13. 2006 9:55AM ALLEN R TEW PA No.3362 P• 2
~~~~k~a~A'~?~
~ r~~r
1 q !q 5~3 -!~, ~~.. C~1 tom. `Cr.~.a +4~#~r~+~t y
r,rt eta/E?~Z'Iption: t'~l ,c~lc~ )e C~C~_~;~r~nc~.vl S~dx~~ .erect # .1.~~
1 4
TL16 ~et~ltlt='f1~ {I~ ~'l0 ~,rV
U.S. Army Corkas of in~rsY W11m1x~gtcu~ i~istrlct
F.CI. l~c~c 1890
kVllmi~x~f~n.I'~G ~ ``--
Atm: __ ~c~v°h t~_ ~ Y1cJv~
~~~
ice: W~t1 >~Ia~t r.~tt~ nrRd ~~
Tti Whom It Ztiiay Ctanc~~
L the c~trx~nt,~ a.~, ~ ~~t~ arui.aa~alrl~ Sa#f fir Ert~3rq~rttxxextt ~1~ts, PA to
act in my beha-ff ~ try t hY t~ pmcessing r-£ permit apph~tlt, to tern x~:rn ~( ~
e~x tear-~n ~o~~an fn ~;mxt of ~f1t, ebC flcxrm Phis ci~yr fc~tr~-ard.. Thy ~''~' day of
'y'ip r~c~tlfl~attax~ super any prevlaus evrr~spuraderare c~or-c~rrxty~ We agent fru th1.s Irk
N~'1`iClr: '17ute, r~ctht>rtrp#i~~n, fuat Ii+I~xillty ~rtdpraEes~r#s~x~ei caurt+r~y re~strr~~, is vAlid o~y fQx
gauerm~te~t af#idoi~ ~ ertt~z the prap+~rty' when arratnpsanf+x~i by 5C ata~x 'y'ou shu~xld X11 S~
to arse, x gita trte prier to rriaitixt~ the sib.
r ~
P~xt F perry Uvvtl~x's N`ar a .~' ~z~
~c: hip. Cyandi tCaroly c: ie yr~i~ar ~
NF,.~liit - DWQ fall 1~ ~~~x-+mt~-1 C~.suf~tan#a, I~~l .
2"21 C~a~e Boulevard
Kalex~h, hi+C ~~i#
~.c: ~~1~
X315 l,~PhiFIJ~ Cann. 5u#u~ C ~ 317-T? Lawlnc~n9e ~ri~ti
~, rrc` a~zs r~s~rt~tx,~, rac xxAis
~~~: t~t~i ~zo•~at+~~ ~ Fxxr r~3d) ~0-3.35
Pdarar~: ~ ~CLt`~Q.~"

Project Number:
10409.W2
Project Manager:
DE
Scale:
I " = 2,000'
Date:
08/3 I /06
Map Title:
FIGURE I -USGS Map
MIDDLE CREEK
COMMONS
Johnston Co., NC
Source:
Edmundson Quadrangle
Soil & Environmental Consultants,
11010 Raven Ridge Rd.• Raleigh, NC 27614
(919}846-5900 - (919} 846-9467
Web Page: wiww.SandEC.can
PA

- - "- ~ -.., ~ i/
/ !
-~ ~ r ~ :'~.Cf. ~ ~
,~
a ~ e ~ i ~~ r'f ~ r~ 1 I F
,:~ ~ , ~~ ,
_ ~ .~ ~ 1~ ~4a ~~~~~~ ., McB ~ m ,~t Cary
tom- CeC f Ge ~ ~ i ~
~,~ ~ fit! ~~ ~, (L °~~ ~ .,~ ~ ~~~ ~~~~
~ , ~ ' Ra v 1 J ~ ° ! ~'cE
+<' ' / i __
~;. -
`~~ ~ r3 PY~6 ~ CeC , 1 ~ ~~ -' CeC NoB 0 \ .'', `/ / f~ f ~~ ~~~
-~~ ~ CeC ~~ `S ~ ~ ,
O ~_ ht ~ ~ PAD n ~ i 4)
O A ~~~~ ~~ P ~ . Mc6 WaB A4c6
S~,° PaD 50 ~ CeB ~ ~ ~ r3o _
O ~
~ o~'~ ~ ,CeC- ~ ~ CeC CeC CeC Q PaD ~~ ~ -
o '_ _ /,
- ~H\b PaE ~\ ~~ ~~ \ ~-__ ~/ 8b
Nob '_ Ce3 PaE ~', _~~~
WaB '~~ / ~il~ ~' PaD - Nk6
-: ~ .~ r- ~ ~ ~ ~ N°~~
1
~ SITE Ij, -~ NoA ~ ~~ ~ ; ~ ~ /~, _
$D 6'~ i 'J NoB:~
~ ~a2 :r'' WaB ::~...,~ ~ McB ~~~~ ~ ~ ~ . ~
~. ~" Ud ~ i ~~,. ~ y '~ - Nob
Cep ~ ..~ ~ NkB
t
F~~ ~"~~~ Wo6 Cob_ '..a - Nob ~j [ Fr- "} Nk6
r ~.i?_ AmB._~ WaB '" Nob a - McB - ~ J ~~ ~ ..
7 ~~ ~ r r NoB ~'.~ -~
'~ WoD~ ~ ~~ Sb r,. ~~ ~ ~~ ~ "~~'.
~", Am8 Q ~ NoA .:r X t ~aE :," ~ ~ ~yrF ._~
CeC ; WoD ci ' a;' '. td F t ~ ~ ~ G_'e ~ -~j
CeB ~ba'' Mc8 '~`- O CeC ,
~~e6 , NoB ~ ~ Bb ~ CeC. „ ~ -"~~CeB ~ ~ ~
~' Fa B O / "
~ ~ r/ Nob ° ' ("~ /: ~ sr ` ~ ~- ~ a
B6~ ~ ~~ VJt~s~~ .PaD NkB ~~O ~'
4YOD , CeC
CeB I ~ t' ~ s~P-~ ~-l,~cE NoB ~ ~`~6 ~/~ ~~CeB
t ~"~ iii ~ f ' "~~ _ ~ r~~., ° -_ '! _ _ ~
J NoA > -_
\\\ e~x ~~ ~ ~ c !~ ~'c ~
~ ~ - ~~ ~ _ ~~ r e Q -~ ~ k; DoA ~~„- v Tr.
,) ~0 Kp ~ ~, ~`~, , Y~n~k~~ t ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Ce8
1 '~
~, ~ i ~ ~: ~ ~ v ~:~ ~,~ : (r -I ~ ti(cF a~ , ~ ~~ ~~ ~ tip. ( ~ Sw... ~~
~ si t ~j ;. ~ ~c ~,c
iuater ~ ,~ yi ~ s'~1 Y~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~ _ ~ - '~~ , s~ ~ r ^~• . rye
,~ 5 F. s' ~ ~t F ~ ~-(~ ~b
~~ ~\ ~ i ` ~~ x{ `~_ ~~s .x:,A ~ NoR ~ S~ ~~ ~ ~.111~ McB~ y
gb I ,~ t 'FSr '3~G~ ~ 0 e
" ~ .~ h ~~~. '~-Y L rJiC$ L ~~ 3~ie G:' Ch ~3ne ~ t' -
=:~\\\ V ~ AeA PaE
~,~, ' ~.' ' ~, PaD ~ ~'
~ ~PaD do ~r.paR i ~ ,~ r
_ ~~ 9 _ ~." W~~ r ~4hf ~ ,
r ~ ~ filet ( _ ~ - ~. ~' t,r. ~ ~7, PaE
''" ~~ ~ t ~ ~~ i A _~ "
~ ~'~w ~~~ ~ ~ ~ ( t~ ` ~ No8 ~ ~' rzi
- ~ .. ~r: - i ~ ~'~ F ra ~ ~ ~ Wt
- McE '~ p~
f w~~ s ..' ~, ~~,,n ~, A ._»~ ~ ~ ~Li
~ ---
Pro~ect Number: Map Title:
10409.W2 FIGURE 2-SOIL SURVEY
Project Manager: MIDDLE CREEK
DE COMMONS ` Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
Scale: Johnston Co., NC 11010 Raven Ridge Rd.• Raleigh, NC 27614
[phone] •[phone]
I ~~ = 2 ~ 000 Web Page: www.SandEC.com
Date: Source:
08/3 I /06 Johnston Co. Soil Survey

~~
URS Corporation -North Carolina
1600 Perimeter Park Drive
Morrisville, North Carolina 27560
July 20, 2006 Telephone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Mr. James Shern
US Army Corps of Engineers
6508 Falls of the Neuse Road, Suite 120
Raleigh, North Carolina 27615
Subject: Section 404/401 Wetland Boundary Verification
Middle Creek Commons
Cleveland Township, Johnston County, NC
Dear Mr. Shern:
On June 1, 2006, you toured the Middle Creek Commons site and granted verbal approval of
the jurisdictional wetland boundaries delineated by URS Corporation (URS). Two areas
containing forested wetlands were observed within the subject property. One wetland (wetland
WA) comprising 1.641 acres was determined to fall under US Army Corps of Engineers
(USAGE) jurisdiction. The other wetland (wetland WB) was determined to be an isolated
wetland therefore falling under the jurisdiction of the North Carolina Division of Water Quality
(NCDWQ). The US Department of Agriculture (USDA) Johnston County Soil Survey indicated
that an unnamed intermittent tributary to Middle Creek was located within the western portion of
the property; however Mr. Michael Horan of the NCDWQ toured the site on May 30, 2006 and
determined that the stream point of origin did not fall within the site boundaries.
The wetland boundaries have been surveyed by a professional land surveyor and are presented
on the enclosed plat maps.
URS is requesting written verification of the jurisdictional wetland boundaries at this time.
If you have any questions or require additional information, please contact me at (919) 461-
1278 (direct line) or by email at [e-mail].
Sincerely,
URS Corporation - Carolina
Ra ode
Ecologist
cc: Mr. Michael Horan, NCDWQ
file
enc: Plat drawings ~ b ~ ~ V
Wetland data forms S~P ~ 1 2~~6
Agent authorization letter
Sot S EmRnnmenial Consultants, PA

DATA FORM
WA -Wetland
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual
Pro'ect/Site: Middle Creek Commons Date: 4/18/2006
A licant / Owner: R enc Centers Count :Johnston
Investi ator: R. Bode, C. Benton URS CORP. State: NC
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? YES NO Communi ID: PF01 b
Is the site si nificantl disturbed At ical Situation ? YES NO Transect ID:
Is the area a tential Problem Area? If needed, ex lain on reverse YES NO Plot ID: WA-35
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant S ecies Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant S ecies Stratum Indicator
Pinus taeda T FAC Clethra alnifolia S FACW
Acer rubrum T FAC Arundinaria i antes S FACW
Liriodendron tuli ifera T FAC Woodwardia areolata H OBL
M ica cerifera S FAC+
Percent of Dominant S ecies that are OBL, FACW, or FAC excludin FAC- :100%
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
[ ]Recorded Data (Describe in Ren
[ ]Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge
[ ]Aerial Photographs
[ ]Other
[ ] No Recorded Data Available
FIELD
Depth to Free Water in Pit
Depth to Saturated Soil
WETLAND HYDROLOGY INDICA
Primary Indicators:
[ ~ Inundated
[ ~C ]Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
[ ]Water Marks
[ ]Drift Lines
[ ]Sediment Deposits
( ]Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
- (in) Secondary Indicators (2 or more Required)
[ X ]Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 inches
4 (in) [ JWater-stained Leaves
[ ]Local Soil Survey Data
0 (in) [ ]FAC-Neutral Test
[ ]Other (Explain in Remarks)
SVILS
Map Unit Name (Series and Phase): Bibb sand, frequently flooded Drainage Class: Poorly drained
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Coarse-loamy, siliceous, active, acid,
thermic T is Fluva vents Field Observations Confirm Mapped Type? YES
PROFILE DESCRIPTION
Depth Horizon Matrix Color Mottle Colors Mottle Abundance/Contrast Texture, Concretions,
inches Munsell Moist Munsell Moist Structure, etc.
0-6 A 10YR2/1 Sand silt
6-12 A2 10YR3N Sand silt
12-16 B 10YR6/1 Sil sand

HYDRIC SOIL INDI CATORS:
[ ] Histosol
[ ] Histic Epipedon
[ ] Sulfidic Odor
( ] Aquic Moisture Regime
[ ]Reducing Conditions
Gle ed or Low-Chroma Colors [ ]Concretions
[ ]High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
[X ]Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
[ ]Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
[ ]Listed on National Hydric Soils List
Other Explain in Remarks
Remarks:
WETLAND DETERMINATION
H dro h is V etation Present? YES NO
Wetland H drolo Present? YES NO Is this Sampling Point Within a Wetland? YES NO
H dric Soil Present? Yf=S NO
Remarks: Wetland is located in headwater area at western side of subject property. Hyrdologic source is from groundwater, surface
flow, and culvert at the north end.

DATA FORM
WA -UPLAND
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
Pro'ect/Site: Middle Creek Commons Date: 4/18/2006
A licant / Owner: R enc Centers Count :Johnston
Investi ator: R. Bode, C. Benton URS CORP State: NC
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? YES NO Communi ID: U land
Is the site si nificantl disturbed At ical Situation ? YES IVO Transect ID:
Is the area a tential Problem Area? If needed, ex lain on reverse YES NO Plot ID: Near WA -35
Dominant Plant S ecies Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant S ecies Stratum Indicator
Pinus taeda T FAC
ti uidambar st aciflua T FAC+
Acer rubrum T FAC
M 'ca cerifera S FAC+
Percent of Dominant S ecies that are OBL, FACW, or FAC excludin FAC- :100%
Remarks:
...,w.,,.. ,.,..,
[ ]Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks) WETLAND HYDROLOGY INDICATORS
[ ]Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators:
(]Aerial Photographs [ ]Inundated
[ ]Other [ ]Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
[ ]Water Marks
[ ] No Recorded Data Available [ ]Drift Lines
[ ]Sediment Deposits
FIELD OBSERVATIONS [ ]Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
~ Depth of Surface Water
~ Depth to Free Water in Pit
Depth to Saturated Soil
..,.....
--- (in) Secondary Indicators (2 or more Required).
[ ]Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 inches
-- (in) [ ]Water-stained Leaves
( ]Local Soil Survey Data
(in) [ ]FAC-Neutral Test
[ ]Other (Explain in Remarks)
~~~~~
Map Unit Name (Series and Phase): Wagramloamy sand, 0%-6% Drainage Class: Well drained
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Loamy, kaolinitic, thermic Arenic Kandiudults Field Observations Confirm Mapped Type? YES

Depth Horizon Matrix Color
inches Munsell Moist PROFILE DESCRIPTION
Mottle Colors Mottle Abundance/Contrast Texture, Concretions,
Munsell Moist Structure, etc.
0-12 A 10YR3/2 Sand loam
12-16 B 10YR4/3 Loam sand

HYDRIC SOIL INDI CATORS:
[ ] Histosol
[ ] Histic Epipedon
[ ] Sulfidic Odor
[ ] Aquic Moisture Regime
[ ]Reducing Conditions
Gle ed or Low-Chroma Colors [ ]Concretions
[ ]High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
[ ]Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
[ ]Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
[ ]Listed on National Hydric Soils List
Other Ex lain in Remarks
Remarks: No hydric soil indicators observed.
u~rr~ a..w w...r.-w...... ~..~..
H dro h is V etation Present? YES NO
Wetland H drolo Present? YES NO Is this Sampling Point Within a Wetland? YES NO
H dric Soil Present? YES NO
Remarks:..

DATA FORM
WB -wetland
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Pro'ect/Site: Middle Creek Commons Date: 4/18/2006
A licant /Owner: Re enc Centers Count :Johnston
Investi ator: R. Bode, C. Benton URS CORP State: NC
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? YES NO Communi ID: PF01b
Is the site si nificantl disturbed At ical Situation ? YES NO Transect ID:
Is the area a tential Problem Area? If needed, ex lain on reverse YES NO Plot ID: WB -10
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant S ecies Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant S ecies Stratum Indicator
Li uidambar st raciflua T FAC+ Smilax rotundifolia V FAC
Acer rubrum T FAC
Arundinaria i antes S FACW
M rica cerifera S FAC+
Percent of Dominant S ecies that are OBL, FACW, or FAC excludin FAC- :100%
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
] Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks)
[ ]Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge
[ ]Aerial Photographs.
[ J Other
[ 3C ] No Recorded Data Available
FIELD OBSERVATIONS
Depth of Surface Water
Depth to Free Water in Pit
Depth to Saturated Soil
SOILS
WETLAND HYDROLOGY INDICATORS
Primary Indicators:
[ ]Inundated
[ ]Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
[ ]Water Marks
[ ]Drift Lines
[ ]Sediment Deposits
[ ]Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
---- (in) Secondary Indicators (2 or more Required)
[ X J Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 inches
--- (in) [ X ]Water-stained Leaves
[ ]Local Soil Survey Data

4 (in) [ ]FAC-Neutral Test
[ ]Other (Explain in Remarks)
Map Unit Name (Series and Phase): Norfolk sandy loam Drainage Class: Well drained
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Fine-loamy, kaolinitic, thermic Typic
Kandiudults Field Observations Confirm Mapped Type? YES N
PROFILE DESCRIPTION
Depth Horizon Matrix Color Mottle Colors Mottle Abundance/Contrast Texture, Concretions,
inches Munsell Moist Munsell Moist Structure, etc.
0-2 A t0YR3/3 Sil loam
2-16 A 10YR4/1 Cla loam

HYDRIC SOIL INDI CATORS:
(] Histosol
[ ] Histic Epipedon
[ ] Sulfidic Odor
[ ] Aquic Moisture Regime
[ X ]Reducing Conditions
X Gle ed or Low-Chroma Colors [ ]Concretions
[ ]High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
[ ]Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
[ ]Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
[ ]Listed on National Hydric Soils List
Other Ex lain in Remarks
Remarks:
WETLAND DETERMINATION
H dro h is V etation Present? YES NO
Wetland H drolo Present? YES NO Is this Sampling Point Within a Wetland? YES NO
H dric Soil Present? YES NO
Remarks: Wetland is located along the southern boundary of the subject property. Hydrologic source is from ground water and surface
flow

DATA FORM
WB -Upland
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manuall
Pro'ect/Site: Middle Creek Commons Date: 4/18/2006
A licant /Owner: Re enc Centers Count :Johnston
Investi ator: R. Bode, C. Benton URS CORP State: NC
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? YES NO Communi ID: U land
Is the site si nificantl disturbed At ical Situation ? YES NO Transect ID:
Is the area a otential Problem Area? If needed, ex lain on reverse YES NO Plot ID: Near WB -1
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant S ecies Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant S ecies Stratum Indicator
Pious taeda T FAC Smitax rotundifolia V FAC
Quercus ellos T FAC
Arundinaria i antea S FACW
Vaccinnium corumbosum S FACW
Percent of Dominant S ecies that are OBL, FACW, or FAC excludin FAG :100%
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY.
[ ]Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks)
[ ]Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge
[ ]Aerial Photographs
[ ]Other
[ ] No Recorded Data Available
FIELD OBSERVATIONS
Depth of Surface Water.
Depth to Free Water in Pit
Depth to Saturated Soil
WETLAND HYDROLOGY INC
Primary Indicators:
[ ]Inundated
[ ]Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
(]Water Marks
[ ] Drrft Lines
[ ]Sediment Deposits
[ ]Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
- (in) Secondary Indicators (2 or more Required)
[ ]Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 inches
- (in) [ ]Water-stained Leaves
[ ]Local Soil Survey Data
[ ]FAC-Neutral Test
-- (in) (]Other (Explain in Remarks)
SUILS
Map Unit Name (Series and Phase): Norfolk sandy loam Drainage Class: Well drained
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Fine-loamy, kaolinitic, thermic Typic
Kandiudults Field Observations Confirm Mapped Type? YES N
PROFILE DESCRIPTION
Depth Horizon Matrix Color Mottle Colors Mottle Abundance/Contrast Texture, Concretions,
inches Munsell Moist Munsell Moist Structure, etc.
0-4 Al 10YR5/4 Loam -sand
48 A2 10YR4/2 Loam sand
8-16 B 10YR5/3 Loam sand

HYDRIC SOIL INDI CATORS:
[ J Histosol
[ ] Histic Epipedon
[ ] Sulfidic Odor
[ ] Aquic Moisture Regime
[ ]Reducing Conditions
Gle ed or Low-Chroma Colors [ ]Concretions
[ ]High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
[ ]Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
[ ]Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
[ ]Listed on National Hydric Soils List
Other Ex lain in Remarks
Remarks: No hydric soil indicators observed.
WETLAND DETERMINATION
H dro h is V etation Present? YES NO
Wetland H drolo Present? YES NO Is this Sampling Point Within a Wetland? YES NQ
H dric Soil Present? YES F10
Remarks

Wetland WA
WETLAND RATINGWORKSHEET:Fourth Version
Project Name: Regency Centers -Middle Creek Commons Nearest Road: NC42 and NC50
County: Johnston Wetland Area: acres Wetland Width feet
Name of Evaluator: Bode, Benton Evaluation Date: 4118/06
nd Location
on pond or lake
on perennial stream
on intermittent stream
within interstream divide
I Series
redominantly organic-humus, muck,
Or peat
redominantly mineral -non-sandy
redominantly sandy
ulic factors
~ topography
red or channelized
wetland width >= 100 feet
Adjacent land use
(within Y= mile upstream, upslope, or radius)
X forested/natural vegetation 80
X agriculture, urbanlsuburban 15
X impervious surface 5
Dominant Vegetation
(1) Acer rubrum
(2) C/ethra alnifolia
(3) Woodwardia areolata
Flooding and wetness
semipermanently to permanently
flooded or inundated
X seasonally flooded or inundated
intermittently flooded or temporary
surface water
No evidence of flooding or
surface water
Wetland type (select one)*
Bottomland hardwood forest Pine savanna
X Headwater forest Freshwater marsh
Swamp forest Bog/fen
Wet flat Ephemeral wetland
Pocasin Carolina Bay
Bog forest Other
*the rating system cannot be applied to salt or brackish marshes or stream channels
Water storage 2 x 4.00 =8
Bank/Shoreline stabilization 0 x 4.00 =0
Pollutant removal 1 x 5.00 =5
Wildlife Habitat 2 x 2.00 =4
Aquatic life value 1 x 4.00 =4
Recreation/Education 1 x 1.00 =1
* Add 1 point if in sensitive watershed and >10% nonpoint disturbance within'/z mile upstream,
upslope, or radius

Wetland WB
WETLAND RATING WORKSHEET Fourth Version:
Project Name: Regency Centers -Middle Creek Commons Nearest Road: NC42 and NC50
County: Johnston Wetland Area: 0.2 acres Wetland Width feet
Name of Evaluator: Bode. Benton Evaluation Date: 4/18/06
and Location
on pond or lake
on perennial stream
on intermittent stream
within interstream divide
other
Series
predominantly organic-humus, muck,
Or peat
predominantly mineral -non-sandy
predominantly sandy
raulic factors
steep topography
ditched or channelized
total wetland width >=100 feet
Adjacent land use
(within'/z mile upstream, upslope, or radius)
X forested/natural vegetation 80
X agriculture, urban/suburban 15
X impervious surface 5
Dominant Vegetation
(1) Llguidambar sfyraciflua
(2) Acer rubrum
(3) Arundinaria gigantea
Flooding and wetness
semipermanently to permanently
flooded or inundated
seasonally flooded or inundated
X intermittently flooded or temporary
surface water
No evidence of flooding or
surface water
Wetland type (select one)*
Bottomland hardwood forest Pine savanna
X Headwater forest Freshwater marsh
Swamp forest Bog/fen
Wet flat Ephemeral wetland
Pocasin Carolina Bay
Bog forest Other
*the rating system cannot be applied to salt or brackish marshes or stream channels
Water storage 2 x 4.00 =8
Bank/Shoreline stabilization 0 x 4.00 =0
Pollutant removal 1 * x 5.00 =5
Wildlife Habitat 1 x 2.00 =2
Aquatic life value 0 x 4.00 =0
Recreation/Education 1 x 1.00 =1
* Add 1 point if in sensitive watershed and >10% nonpoint disturbance within'/: mile upstream,
upslope, or radius

May 10, 2006
Mr. James Shern
US Army Corps of Engineers
6508 Falls of the Neuse Road, Suite 120
Raleigh, North Carolina 27615
RE: Authorization for URS to act as agent on behalf of Regency Centers
Dear Mr. Shern
This letter is to confirm that URS Corporation is acting on behalf of Regency Centers Inc.
concerning delineation of wetlands and streams on the Middle Creek Commons site near
Clayton in Johnston County, North Carolina.
Correspondence with Regency Centers regarding this project should be sent to:
David R Smith
Senior Manager -Construction
101 Maynard Crossing Court
Cary, NC 27106
[phone] Direct
[phone] Cell
X19) 469-9883 Fax
[e-mail]
Please feel free to contact me with any questions.
Regency Centers
Cc: David Smith, Regency Centers
101 Maynard Crossing Court
Cary, North Carolina 27513
Office: 919.466.1500 • Toll Free: 888.468.9800 • Fax: [phone]
www. rege ncycente rs. com
Vice President

l.~ J
URS Corporation -North Carolina
1600 Perimeter Park Drive
Morrisville, North Carolina 27560
August 28, 2006 Telephone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Mr. Michael Horan
North Carolina Division of Water Quality
Raleigh- Regional Office
1628 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1628
Subject: Intermittent stream origin determination
Middle Creek Commons
Cleveland Township, Johnston County, NC
Dear Mr. Horan:
On May 30, 2006, you toured the Middle Creek Commons site and determined that the wetland
to the south of the site (wetland WB) was an isolated wetland therefore falling under the
jurisdiction of the North Carolina Division of Water Quality (NCDWQ). Also, it was determined
that the point of origin of an unnamed intermittent tributary to Middle Creek shown on the US
Department of Agriculture (USDA) Johnston County Soil Survey within the western portion of
the property did not fall within the site boundaries.
URS is requesting written verification of the determination of the point of origin of the stream
channel at this time. S&EC Consultants is compiling the permit application at this time and this
document is outstanding. Please forward the written verification both to me and to:
Debbie Edwards
Environmental Specialist
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
11010 Raven Ridge Road
Raleigh, North Carolina 27614
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Mobile: [phone]
If you have any questions or require additional information, please contact me at (919) 461-
1278 (direct line) or by email at [e-mail].
Sincerely,
URS...Cyorporation,-North Carolina
~" ,~~ ter''?
~~ ~, v`;'
rte.
Ra~r~ode
Ecologist
cc: file
enc: Subject property location map
S M
D
sE~ o ~ 2oos
8y: Soil & Envirornnenfal Cansutt~rsts. PA

Legend ~ FIGURE 1
'1k' Approximate Location Mortisville. NC SUBJECT PROPERTY LOCATION
of Subject Property N
NC Counties A MIDDLE CREEK COMMONS
USGS Edmundson, NC REGENCY CENTERS
Johnston 7.5' quadrangle map, 1993. o ~,ooo z,ooo
Feet

SEP-14-2006 06 35 P.02i04
QF ~~"/F,4 ~, Michael F, Easley, Governor
`O~ QG I William G_ Ross Jr., Secretary
C~ y North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
> rT
~ Y Alan W, Klimek, P.L. ptrector
Division of Water Quality
September 5, 2006
URS Corporation
C/o Ray Bode
1600 Perimeter Park Dr.
Morrisville, NC 275b0
Attn: Mr. Ray Bode
BASIN:
1Veuse R1VL`r X
(ISA NCf-C 2B .0233) -
Complaint
NOV
NBR# 06-215
Johnston County
Tar-Pamlico
(15A NCAC 213 ,0259) " ~~
incident #
Determination X
Project Name: Middle Creep Gammons
Location/Direetions: located o the so thwest creel of the interseetio of NC 42 and NC 50 in Johnston Co,
Subject Stream: UT to Middle Creek
Date of Determination: 5/30/2004
Feature(s) Not Subject Start @
Subject
A X Ofi property
at buffer stsirt
flea
_ _.
Comments: Not subject on property,
.. ~ _
Explanation: The feature(s) listed above hes or have been located on the Soil Survey of Johnston County, North
Carolina or the most recent copy ofthe iJSGS Topographic map at a 1:24,000 scale. Each feature that is checked
"Not Subject" has been determined not to be a stream or is not present on the property, Features that are checked
"Subject" have been located on the property and possess characteristics that qualify it to be a stream. There may be
other streams other str~eatns located on your property that do not show up on the msps referenced above but, still
a ° Carolina
Jl~afura!!~
Stream Soil USGS
1~orm Pts. Survey Topv
X
North Caroline Division of Water Quality Ratciglt Regional Office Surfacc3 Writer Protection Phone [phone] Customer Service
lntemek h2o.enrstate.nc,us 1628 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1628 FA?i [phone] t-877-623-674x
An Equal OpportunitylAtfimlaGve ActJon Employer -- 50~ Recycled/tb% Post Cotlsumer Paper

SEP-14-2006 06 35 P.03i04
Johnston County
9/5/2006
Page2of2
maybe considered jurisdictional according to the US Army Cores of Engineers and/or to the Division of Water
Quality.
Thls on-site determination shall expire five (S~ years from the date of this letter. Landowners or affected
parties that dispute a determination made by the DWQ or Delegated focal Authority that a s>irfau st fotr a
exists and that it is subject to the buffer rule may request a determination by the Director. A req
determination by the Director shall be referred to the Director in writing e/o Cyndi Karoly , DVVQ
Wetlands1401 C7nit, 2321 Crabtree Blvd., Raleigh, NC 27604-2260. Individuals that dispute a determination
by the DWQ or pelegated Local ~~ het within 60 days of'the datecthat youf re eive this letter./ Appll a is are
an ad judicatory hearing. You mcludin
hereby notified that the 60-day statutory appeal time does not start until the affected party {' g
downstream and adjacent landowners) is notified of this decision. DaWlsQre ma~'n astlmelyhm nner.a To ask
conduct this notification in order to be certain that third party app
for a hearing, send a of Admlmtstr five I-learings~6714 Mail Service Cent rw, R lcigh N Cu2'1699-67 4. This
Statutes to the Offic
determination is final and binding unless you ask for a hearing within 60 days, _ . .
The (o'wner/futare owners) shoald notify the Division of Water Quality (Including any other Local, State,
and Federal Agencies) of this decision concerning any future correspondences regarding the subject property
(stated above). This project may require a Sectton Central Offi e f aC (919) 733- 86~ and the i.TS tArmY ~
should be directed to the Dlvisiott of Water Quality ( )
Corp of Engineers (Raleigh Regulatory Fietd Office) at (919)-876-8441.
Respect~fullyp,
„~11,tClt[ux ~~'~'`~
Michael Horan
1~nviranzncntal Spec. I
CC: Shandra Coats-. Johnston County Government, F.O. Box 1049, Smithfield, NC 27577
7atnie Shern-US Army Corps of Engineers, Raleigh Regulatory Office
Wetlands/ Stormwater Branch, 2321 Cxahtree Blvd, Suite 250, Raleigh, NC 27b04
RRO/SWP Files
Central Files
mlly

North C.afokins Division of Wrttr Quality Rc5
o
n
a
~f
R 28 ~ ~ ci
h NC 7699-1628 FAX [phone]-dz3~ $e
Intemek h2o.enr.stdte.nc.us c
r
~
e
3
~ ~
t ~
An Equal OpportuniiylA~rmative Adiop Empfoyet- 50°~ Recycled/10°~6 Post Consumer Papef

SEP-14-2006 06 36 P.04i04
TOTAL P. 84
___ --
~~. s~~ t c,~1-~w SURVi=YED
Legend ~ ~ ~ ~~,Q /D(~ "'ei{'""~'N° WETLAND BOUNDARIES
[_] Nc Counties Approximate Location of Subject Prope~ty A
.jonnston Surveyed Wetlands o ' ` 20o MIDQ~.E CREEK COMMONS
USGS Edmuadson, NC 7,s g4adrerple map, 1993. ~ 'Feat REGENCY CENTERS

SEP-14-2006 06 3'7
2 12~ 000 FEET
n ~ ,r' 1M
- ~ '~:
' `•Yk~•.. h.
!4 ~ •
F ~..--
m' ~ W~ ,
ar . ~ ~ N'.
.~~..
~,.,+..
ur ~'...bie~ o~ ~~~
s~~bcb~ ~° WQO~
P.81i01
TT
~'
w. ~Z.~ ` ~ ~~'~~ ' lid/
Y/~

F, r r~
1T~' v
•~~ ~ ~. ~ .~
Y
_~ ~
.
~
~
:~ %:
,,. , r ~
w,
~.
~
~'
~
r
Y, ~
l

~
•

~ ~ J
',I
.~
~
.X~ ~~ R ~ - ~ ~ ~~y~
r r' L ~
~ ~
-
` J
~
i ,i Ca
r (• -~~N
~~t
e~i
~
> ~ 7 GJ~
4 ~~~
fir
y
. ,

~
~~, !
'~ 1
!
~yi+
a~
',;f .. , ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ti
,.
'

i
~ I
`

- .~~ t ~3. ^~ r .c~
44 ~~
~ ry

~ ~, ~
I
•
'~+ l
,
n* 1
1
y
~ 1 r R
,~~
~ ar~ P?.
S Y
~ ~.
'•~~
. -.tr
k ~c'µ ~
~ I t
'~ ; M.-

~f rj~ y0.r
` 1'. v~
,~ ~ .
~~k`~G8
_ _

l7y-IOb-' IOb 15 : b'L rHUCI-llt;Nti ~l;t' yly (15LIOt71
c~
~.
''''pp r
~i.~.
Ptcoc RAM
September 6, 2006
Debbie Edwards
S&~EC
11010 Raven Ridge Rd
Raleigh, NC ?7614
Project: Middle Creek Commons Counry: Johnston
1 -125,5 YVJL u- r cat
The purpose of this letter is to notify you that the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhaneempnt Progam (N'C EEP) is willing to
accept payment for impacts associated with the above referenced project. Please note that this decision does not assure tl-at
die payment will be approved by the permit issuing agencies as mitigation for project impacts_ It is the responsibility of the
applicant to contact these agencies to determine if payment to the NC EEP will be approved.
'This acceptance is valid for six months from the date of this letter. )(f we have not received a copy of the issued 404
1Permit/401 Certit~c~tfon within this tfine frame, this acceptance will expire. It is the applicant's responsibility to send
copies of the 404/401/CA1rtA permits to NC EEP, Once NC EEP receives a copy of the 404 Permit and/or the 401
Certification an utvoice will be issued and payment must be made.
Based on the information supplied by you the impacts that may require compensatory mitigation are summarized in the
following table.
River Basin Wetlands Stream Buffer Buffer
Cataloging (Acres) ()_,itlear Feet) Zone 1 Zone 2
Unit
(Sq_ Ft.)
(Sq. Ft.)
Ri arian Non-Ri arian Coastal Marsh Cold Cool Warm
Neuse 0 0.47 0 0 0 0 0 0
03020201
Upon receipt of payment, EEP will take responsibility for providing the compensatory mitigation for the permitted impacts
up to a 2:1 mitigation to-impact ratio, (buffers, Zoae 1 at a 3:1 ratio and Zone 2 at a 1.5:1 ratio). The type and amount of the
compensatory mitigation will be as specified in the Section 404 Permit and/or 401 Water Quality Certification, and/or
CAMA Permit. The mitigation will be performed in accordance with the 1Vlernorandum of Understanding between the N. C_
Department of Environment and Natural Ttesources and the U. S. Army Corps of Engineers dated November 4, 199$.
if you have any questions or need additienal information, please contact Carol Shaw at [phone].
cc: Cyndi Karoly, Wetlands/401 Unit
Jean Manuele, USACE-Raleigh
Eric Kulz, DWQ-Raleigh
1?ile
Sincerely,
c
yti~~~~~
illiam b. ilmore, PE
Director
R,~ori~t~... ~ ... Pro>~~ Ou.~ Sfat,~

North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program, 1652 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1652 / 919-715-0476 / www.nceep,net

Michael 1'. >/asley, Uovemor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
August 31, 2006
Johnston County
EXPRESS REVIEW ACCEPTANCE LETTER
Regency Centers
Attn: David Smith
101 Maynard Crossing Court, Suite 211
Cary, NC 27513
Dear Mr. Smith:
Project Name: Middle Creek Commons
M ~ ~ Y
D
SEP 0 6 2006
8y: Sod 6 Em~rortrnental Consultants. PA
On August 31, 2006, the 401 Oversight/Express .Permitting Unit of the Division of Water Quality received a
request from Debbie Edwards, of S&EC, regarding a project known as "Middle Creek Commons" for acceptance
into the Express Review Program. This letter advises. you that your project will be accepted into the Express
Review Program once the following items are received:
1. The application fee of $1,000.00 [for 401 Water Quality Certification service], made payable to the North
Carolina Division of Water Quality];.
2. Five (5) complete and collated copies. of the PCN Application;
3. One (1) copy of the Addendum; and
4. Five (5) copies of all site plan information pertaining to this project (please refer to the Addendum
http•//h2o enr state nc us/ncwetlands/appadd5.pdf).
Thank you for your attention to this matter. Please keep in mind that the clock for this. project will not start until
receipt of the completed application package and required fee are received. If the impacts are greater than
indicated on the initial interest form and/or the services. are different, you may be required to remit an additional
fee.
If you have any questions or wish to discuss these matters further please do not hesitate to call Lia Myott or
Cynthia Van Der Wiele of 919-733-1786.
Sincerely, n _ _ / ~~
~~-
Cyndi Karoly, anager
1/Express Review Oversite Unit
CBK/cvdw
cc: File copy
Debbie Edwards, S&EC; 11010 Raven Ridge Road, Raleigh, NC
40t Oversight /Express Review Permitting Unit
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1650
2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Phone: [phone] FAX [phone]ntemet: ht :i%h2o.enrstate.nc.us.:ncwetlands
No Carolina
,J1~atura!!r~
An Equal OpportunitylAffinnative Action Employer - 50% Regded110°~ Post Consumer Paper

JORiSDICfIONAL DEfERMRdATION SURVEY };,FCF«,rn
MIDDLE CREEK COMMONS Luc e~F
PROPERTY OF ELIZABETH TAYLOR BARBER.,.
CLEVELAND TOWNSHIP, JOHNSTON
PREPARED FOR
REGENCY REALTY GROUP
CORPS. WETLANDS CERTiFlCA110N
t~NERAI NOTES:
VICINITY MAP (N.T.S.)
I, DAVID K. BRUBAKER, CERTIFY THAT THIS PUT
WAS DRAWN UNDER MY SUPERVISION FROM AN
ACTUAL SURVEY MADE UNDER MY SUPERVISION
DESCRIPTION RECORDED IN BOOK ~`z , PAGi:~
THAT THE BOUNDARIES NOT SURVEYED ARE CLEARLY
INDICATED AS DRAWN FROM INFORMATION AS SHOWN ON
THE FACE OF THIS MAP; THAT THE RAi10 OF PREgSiON
AS CALCUUTED IS is ;AND THAT
THIS PUT WAS PREPAR ACCORDANCE WITH G.S.
47-30 AS AMENDED., THE S MY ORI 1 k~141~J~RE,
REGI TRAiI NUMBER, AND Al THI$, ~i~
OF , A.D. J ......,. N ~i
~ :~~ ~~ ~~4ESS10~ 9 ~i;
.. s4 ~ ~
i ~.xb6 =
DAVID K. BRUBAKER, P.L.S.
y, Q'; ~
~ ~1 ~
.,~~''o in ``, ``~~
I, DAVID K. BRUBAKER, PROFESSIONAL UND SURVEYOR
/ 2968, CERTIFY TO ONE OR MORE OF THE FOLLOWING
AS INDICATED:~~
X
_ THAI;, THIS PU IS OF A SURVEY OF AN
EXIySA1JG PAR OR PARCELS OF LAND;
DAVID K. BRUBAKER; P.L.S. ~ 2968
COUNN, NC
THIS CERTIFlES THAT THIS COPY OF THIS PUT ACCURATELY
DEPICTS THE BOUNDARY OF THE JURISMCTION OF SECTION 404
OF THE CLEAN WATER ACT AS DETERMINED BY THE UNDERSIGNED
ON THIS DATE. UNLESS THERE IS A CHANGE IN THE UW OR
OUR PUBLISHED REGUU110NS, THIS DETERMINATION OF SECTION
404 JURISDICTION MAY BE RELIED UPON. FOR A PERIOD NOT TO
EXCEED FlVE YEARS FROM THIS DATE. THIS DETERMINATION WAS
MADE UTILIZING THE 1987 CORPS OF ENGINEERS WETLANDS
DEUIpp>s,(1TlON MANUAL.
REGUUT~O~Y OFFlgAL'' . " ,
v ~ ~ ~
TITLE
~Iz~ l o~
DATE
~IQ ' V
USACE ACTION ID
THE PURPOSE OF THIS MAP IS TO IDENTIFY
WETLANDS DELINEATED BY URS, INC., TO BE
APPROVED BY THE U.S. ARMY CORPS OF
ENGINEERS. THIS MAP IS NOT INTENDED TO
REFLECT A COMPLETE BOUNDARY SURVEY OF
THE PARCEL
PROPERTY SUBJECT TO ALL EASEMENTS AND
RESTRICTIONS OF RECORD
LINES NOT SURVEYED ARE SHOWN AS BROKEN
UNES FROM INFORMATION REFERENCED ON THE
FACE OF THIS PUT
THE AREA SHOWN HEREON WAS COMPUTED
USING THE COORDINATE COMPUTA110N METHOD
BASIS OF BEARINGS: NCGS GRID COORDINATES,
NAD 83/2001 DATUM
ALL DISTANCES ARE HORIZONTAL GROUND
DISTANCES IN U.S. FEET UNLESS OTHERWISE
NOTED

=f
~A W
~/
GQ~IERAL NOTES (CONT'D.):
TEIIS PUT IS A CORRECT REPRESENTATION OF
THE LAND PUTTED AND Hi,S SEEN PREPARED
IN CONFORMITY 1hITH NORTH- CAROLINA
STANDARDS, G.S. 47-30, AND REQUIREMENTS
OF UW, BUT A NORTH CAROLINA LICENSED
ATTORNEY-AT-UW SHOULD BE CONSULTED
REGARDING CORRECT OWNERSHIP, WIDTH, AND
LtX;AT10N OF EASEMENTS AND OTHER TITLE
QUESTIONS REVEALED BY r ^..t EXAMINATION
SOURCE OF TITLE
WB 1 B, PG. 195
DB 423, PG. 93
JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION SURVEY
MIDDLE CREEK COMMONS
PROPERTY OF ELIZABETH TAYLOR BARBER
CLEVELAND TOWNSHIP, JOHNSTON COUNTY, N.C.
PREPARED FOR
REGENCY REALTY GROUP
CHAS. H. SELLS, INC.
CONSULTING BNGD!IEERS, SURVEYORS, AND PHOTOGRA]O1ETRiSTS
15401 11ESTON PARKIIAY SUITE 100 CARP, NC 27515
PHONE:919.878.OOS5 FAZ:919.878.0208 1fII1f.~~~ist7r~,C01[
Drawn By DB Date Job No.
Surveyed by MH MAY 30, 2006 06-7051
Checked By CEB/DKB Scale Drwg. No.
Fle Name MIDDLE CREEK COMMONS VYEILANDS N/A 1 OF 3
Revisions 1) PER URS COMMENTS 7-20-06 3)

--- NC HIGHWAY 42
-~R~__.-- ~- V I NCDOT CLNMEO 100' PUBLIC R/W
.._...nn nl C

LEGEND:
cP 0 COMPUTED POINT
wMZ90 wETLANU FLAG
cP- t 4 WETLAND TIE PgNT
RBF7• REBAR FOUL
PKSQ PK NAIL SET
pK0 PK NAIL FOUND
a® cEaoEno MONIAAENr
PROPERTY TINE
- - - PROPERTY LINE (Not SURVEYED)
-- . - CREIX CHANlEL
---- NON-JURISDICTIONAL STREAM
Wc'1LANDS BOUNDARY
Wc"RuWDS AREA
-R/W- RIGHT-OF-WAY
-EP- EDGE OF PAVEMENT
NOW OR FORMERLY
ELIZABETH TAYLOR BARBER
WB 1 B, PG. 195
PIN: 1616-79-0505
``~pil
~~ ~~
r:Q
NlJ~~~i
wA-z4
o WA-2S
~ -~- O
w ~^ `9
~ ~,~ , -;3~; ~ wA-aa
~~ '~
~ wA-r~ ., ~'1 ~~~', wA-zz
J W
a wA-zo ti,* 2w wA-zt
~ ~
~ ~ v '~ / wA-20
~ ~ J`'
wA 30
,~},~ wA-1o
t ~ a;
W O i/ /w,
~ ~ wA-31 ~.,~~ wA-1e
<"b
°z ;oe ; ~
WA-17
wA- ' a
^r; '
WA-33 yob >~ wA-16
~ ~~.
?~ ~:
3S ~ wA-1S
~ ~ ~ A 1DRVI ~ ~
m 9 ~. t ; DA wA-14
~ ~ :/ ~ ~, 4
1~
., t: ~2; ., W/,l-:0>(.37, DA-3 DA-4
(~ _ 83.31' 89.81'

S -
968
'~ ~''
t~11111{11~; _t1

11.63'

~
l - R/W
N86'2_9'04~E ~-
971.38'
E)4STIND 30' C.P. k L EASEMENT
BASED ON UTILITY PDIE LOCATION
AREAS IMTHIN USACE JURISDICTION
71,498 SQ. FT. / 1.641 ACRES
NOW OR FORMERLY
ELIZABETH TAYLOR BARBER
WB 18, PG. 195
DB 423, PG, 93
PIN: 1616-79-0505
TOTAL RECOMBINED AREA
606,357 S0. FT. / 13.920 GROSS ACRES
88,219 SD. FT. / 2.025 ACRES IN R/W
518,138 SQ. FT. 11.895 NET ACRES
AREAS NOT SUBJECT TO USACE JURISDICTION I
663.9 LINEAR FEET
L41 DA-6 DA-7 -
DA-5 L42 L'~ L44 DA-9 ~ `u D-~\DRAW DA-11
lfe L47
N8T58'30`yy_ 1067.24' ~
SEE DETAIL ~'2 SHEET 3
~~
~" s
Aso,.
(~A~F
EXISTING EASEMENT LINE ~ ~
PER NCDOT RIGHT-OF-WAY
AGREEMENT DAZED SEPTEMBER '
1956 -PROJECT }'4864
DD 1323, PG 60
EXISTING WATERLINE EASEMENT
DB 1724, PG 37
SEE DETAIL ~ 1 SHEET 3

i
N ~
o
r~o
Nd
d
O
EXISTING C.P. k L EASEMENT~~~~~~ ~ N
~
DASEO ON 15' OFF CENTERUN ~

OF U11UTY POLE LOCATIONS ~
!I
CONTROL CORNER I'
0.75' REBAR FOUND
Y(N): 670,312670
X(E): 2,119,067.655
NC GRID NAD 83/200\
~A
50'
312.61' S0.

O~
~m
}~ a
=o
C7 ~
=3
U~
O
Z~
0
U
z

.1117,24' (TOTAL)
NCGS "MESSER'
Y(N):669,382552 ~ GROUND)
X(E): 2,106,410.400 ,
NC GRID NAD 83/2001 ~ _N85'4814 E 12712_85 ( _ . - -
a~ ~ -'J ~ rCOMBINED GRID (ACTOR: U•999880496
N74y633 WJ~1
1914p,60' ~ \
~GRip~~ ~
NOW OR FORMERLY
D do S PROPERTIES, LLC
DB 2849, PG. 589
PIN: 1616-89-4820

z~
~
~
~z
0
~~
V1
mZ

NCGS '25 L8 1"
Y(N}: 664,195.299
X(E): 2,124,834.700
NC GRID NAD 83/2001 DATUM
GRAPHIC SCALE
too 0 5o too 200 ODD
( IN FEET )
1 inch = 100 ft. MAPCHECK BY CEB 7/14/06
JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION SURVEY
MIDDLE CREEK COMMONS
PROPERTY OF ELIZABETH TAYLOR BARBER
CLEVELAND TOWNSHIP, JOHNSTON COUNTY, N.C.
PREPARED. FOR
REGENCY REALTY GROUP
CHAS. H. SELLS, INC.
CONSULTING ENGII~BRS, SURVEYORS, AND PHOTOGRAIO[E'PRiSTS
15401 IIESTON PARK1fAY SUTfE 100 CARP, NC 27519
PHONE: 919.878,0095 FAX: [phone] lllllf.~~~t't;1.rs,COY
Drawn By DB Date Job No.
Surveyed by MH MAY 30, 2006 06-7051
Checked By CEB~DKB Scale Drwg. No.
File Name MIDDLE CREEK COMMONS WEZWIDS 1" = 100' 2 OF 3
Revisions 1)PER URS COMMENT'S 7-20-06 3)
4

WETLAND FLAG COORDINATE TABLE
DA-11 670348.2816 2118680.9296
DA-I-DRAW 670368.0218 2118122.8318
DA-2 670369.3022 2118208.3484
DA-3 670367.6649 2118245.0566
DA-4 670367.7699 2118284.4188
DA-S-DRAW 670375.1739 2118325.7154
DA-6 670375.8031 2118360.3975
DA-7-DRAW 670317.5380 2118405.7353
DA-8 670383.0605 2118448.0808
DA-9 670371.1406 2118533.8001
DB-10-DRA 670366.8369 2118614.3686
WA-13 670359.1774 2118212.5348
WA-14 670389.7496 2118259.3128
WA-15 670429.9968 2118262.1250
WA-16 610481.1263 2118256.7046
WA-17 670526.8762 2118250.6567
WA-1B 670565.2670 2118259.4047
WA-19 670601.6642 2118259.5267
WA-20 670637.7549 2118257.0429
WA-21 670681.2919 2118265.7285
WA-22 670724.4154 2118259.8526
WA-23 670754.1176 2118269.7820
WA-24 670830.3186 2118274.1641
WA-25 670799.7128 2118246.0768
WA-26 670753.8918 2118179.9617
WA-26 670786.8440 2118194.4320
WA-27 670714.8949 2118174.0594
WA-28 670697.7178 2118146.8365
WA-29 670672.6521 2118123.9660
WA-30 670611.1555 2118110.0226
WA-31 670557.3029 2118097.3177
WA-32 670505.1719 2118085.6562
WA-33 670477.1069 2118056.8226
WA-34 670434.8652 2118031.6503
WA-35-END 670442:7403 2117997.6233
WA-5 670355.8429 2118114.7672
WA-6 670366.4075 2118124.5048
WB-10-END 670332.6042 2118757.4511
WB-5-DRAW 670340.8050 2118756.5011
CP-1 67034.4580 2118104.3350
CP-2 670347.0470 2118115.9540
CP-3 670343.8740 2118205.7030
CP-4 670436.7930 2118023.3210
CP-5 670325.1370 2118735.6370
CP-6 670323.8810 2118771.1600
CP-7 670323.7370 2118775.2400
WETLAND FLAG LINE TABLE
LINE LENGTH BEARING
L8 8.55 N76'S8'09"W
L9 49.17 S30'4T28"W
L10 40.24 S45'46'26"W
L11 53.42 S12'36'33"W
L12 55.33 S13'16'28"W
U 3 63.06 S12'46'30"W
L14 33.93 S42'22'41 "W
L15 32.19 S57'44'56"W
L16 39.44 S08'36'24"W
L17 35.99 S23'42'28"W
L18 53.22 S76'00'29"W
L19 41.54 S42'32'35"W
L20 76.33 N03'17'29"E
L21 31.32 N18'29'05"E
L22 43.52 N07'45'33"W
L23 44.39 N11'16'S7"E
L24 36.18 N03'S6'13"W
L25 36.40 N00'11'32"E
L26 39.37 N12'S0'12"E
L27 46.15 N07'31'S0"W
L28 51.42 N06'03'05"W
L29 40.35 N03'S9'49"E
L30 55.88 N56'49'S9"E
L31 16.76 N24'03'22"E
L32 13.38 N51'12'32"E
L33 14.37 N42'40'02"E
L34 21.16 823'49'44"W
L35 23.06 N71'06'14"E
L36 16.25 S57'31'S3"E
L37 85.53 N89'OS'32'E
L38 36.74 887'26'46"E
L39 39.36 N89'S0'S0"E
L40 41.96 N79'S0'08"E
L41 34.69 N88'S7'38"E
L42 45.37 N87'48'31"E
L43 42.70 N82'34'11"E
L44 85.92 886'02'58"E
L45 81.22 582'42'44"E
L46 69.10 S74'25'23"E
L47 75.94 584'21'00"E
L48 25.35 847'40'19"E
UNE TABLE
LINE LENGTH BEARING
L1 23.45 S19'09'Ot"E
L2 67.83 S46'01'43"E
L3 134.64 S46'01'43"E
L4 67.83 S46'01'43"E
L5 99.62 N86'29'04"E
L6 99.62 S01'2Y29"W
we-lo \
.'(y
4',.
18'30"W 1117.24' (TOTAL)
4.08'
DETNL ~2 (N.T.S.)
EXISTING WATERLINE ~
EASEMENT
OB 1724, PG 37

AREAS NOT SUBJECT TO USACE JURISDICTION
146 SQ. FT. / 0.003 ACRES
0
?n
i~
Wo
m`
~, z
0
0
~~
mV
z
,,~ttt
`~~
~~~=.,oF
Q~
:i
t
i.
i4
n, ~~i.
r
i i
~:'
K. BRU~± ~~~`~`~
illltltt p~~p
~\~1"
MAPCHECK BY CEB 7/14/06
JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION SURVEY
MIDDLE CREEK COMMONS.
PROPERTY OF ELIZABETH TAYLOR BARBER
CLEVELAND .TOWNSHIP, JOHNSTON COUNTY, N.C.
PREPARED .FOR
REGENCY REALTY GROUP
CHAS. H. SELLS, INC.
CONSULTING ENGINEERS, SURVEYORS, AND PflOTOGRAMMETRISTS
15401 IIESTON PARKIIAY SUITE 100 CARY, NC 27513
PHONE: [phone] FAX: [phone]flflf.CHASHSELIS.COM
Drown By DB Date Job No.
Surveyed by MH MAY 30, 2006 06-7051
Checked By CEB/DKB Scale Drwg. Na.
Fle Nome MIDDLE CREEK COMMONS Wt"1lANpS N/A 3 OF 3
Revisions 1) PER URS COMMENTS 7-20-06 3)
2) 4)

RESERVOIR WATERSHED PROTECTION IMPOUNDMENT MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT
PROJECT: Middle Creek Commons Shopping Center
BMP Constructed Wetland and Level Spreader per plans completed by Chas H. Sells. Inc
RESPONSIBLE PARTY: Regency Realty Group, Inc. PHONE #: [phone]
ADDRESS: 101 Maynard Crossing Center, Cary. NC 27513
I. Monthly or after every runoff producing rainfall, whichever comes first:
a. Remove debris from trash rack.
b. Check and clear orifice of any obstructions.
c. Check pond side slopes; remove trash, repair eroded areas before next rainfall.
II. Quarterly
a. Inspect the collection system (i.e., catch basin, piping, grassed swales) for proper functioning.
Clear accumulated trash from basin grates, and basin bottoms, and check piping for obstructions.
b. Check pond inlet pipes for undercutting. Repair if necessary.
c. Repair any broken pipes.
d. Replace rip rap that is choked with sediment.
III. Semi-Annually
a. Remove accumulated sediment from bottom of outlet structure.
b. Check pond depth at various locations. If depth is reduced to 75% of original design depth, remove
sediment to original design depth.
c. Reseed grassed swales twice yearly. Repair eroded areas immediately.
IV. Annual
a. Submit report to the Environmental Protection Administrator with the following information:
• Site map with specific BMP identified by number or letter
• Owner name
• Inspector name, Professional Engineer registration seal, signature and date
• Weather at time of inspection
• Most recent rain event date and approximate amount
• BMP type
• Specific information about the condition of the BMP
• Note any repairs needed or made
• Provide at least two pictures of the structure, showing the inflow and outflow area.
IV. General
a. Mow side slopes according to the season. Maximum grass height to be six (6) inches.
b. Cattails are encouraged along pond perimeter, however, they must be removed when they cover
the entire surface area of pond.
c. All components of impoundment system to be kept in good working order.
d. In case the ownership of the Impoundment Transfers, the current owner shall, within thirty (30) days
of transfer of ownership, notify the Johnston County Environmental Protection Administrator, of
such ownership transfer.
e. This property and impoundment is also subject to the Operation and Maintenance Manual filed with
the register of deeds.

[ b.c~ $EHi4l. F D~'~EG~.t~ y~~~it-7'Y ~-,r ~'ouP~
I, <_r~~s l,~l,~,~vsCER ,hereby acknowledge that I am the financially responsible party for
maintenance and inspection of this impoundment. I will perform the maintenance as outlined above, to comply
with the Johnston County Stormwater Management Ordinance and the Stormwater Management permit
received for this project. Furthermore, I attest that this Inspection and Maintenance Agreement is on file with
the Register of D
Signature: ~ Date: --~~-~-
I, ~~. ~1/I yi, a Notary Public for the State of ~C ,County ofI D~,
do h reb certify tha S W~~ ersonall a eared before me this (~'~'
r Y rr lay ~f
200 and acknowledge due execution of the foregoing instrument. Witness my
hand and official seal,
\\~~\\111 I I Ill~~~i
S • M'• M~~• '~i~~ My commission expires: 5I ~0~
.4• .y.
?Glai~enan~~~ient ~ '`
~ . PUBLIC :
~, V\
/'//~~~~~ COUN~?~\`