20211801 Ver 1_DF17614.2044019_Haywood Bridge 382_404 and 401 Permit Application Package_20211209

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Roy COOPER J.ERIC BOYETTE
GOVERNOR SECRETARY
December 9, 2021
Mrs. Crystal Amschler, Project Manager
U. S. Army Corps of Engineers
151 Patton Avenue, Room 208
Asheville,NC 28801-2714
Subject: After-the-Fact Nationwide 3 Permit Application Narrative and Natural Resources
Report Update
DF17614.2044019 (formerly B-5900 and BP14.R004)
Replacement of Bridge#430382 on SR 1835
Haywood County,North Carolina
Dear Mrs. Amschler:
The North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) Division 14 is replacing bridge
#430382 on SR 1835 over Dutch Cove Creek in Haywood County(see map). This bridge was
completely washed-out by Tropical Storm Fred on August 17, 2021 and is now being replaced
quickly because it serves as the sole vehicle access to many residents of the community. The
replacement will be a new bridge situated on approximately the same footprint of the old bridge.
A written Nationwide 3 verification is hereby requested for the proposed unavoidable impacts of
the replacement in part due to a"may affect not likely to adversely affect" determination for
clearing of some potentially suitable bat roost trees. This project will be funded by the Federal
Emergency Management Agency as part of a Federally Declared Emergency.
Section 7
NCDOT coordinated with you and staffs with the United States Fish and Wildlife Service
(USFWS)regarding Tropical Storm Fred related Section 7 and 404 permitting procedures on
August 22 and 25, 2021 and in a field meeting on September 7, 2021. Also, in accordance with
recent direction from the USFWS, the project was screened using IPAC to determine the
potentially affected listed species. According to the screening conducted on October 1, 2021 the
only federally listed species with the potential to be in or near the project area include
Appalachian elktoe (Alasmidonta raveneliana), rock gnome lichen(Gymnoderma lineare), small
whored pogonia(Isotria medeoloides), gray bat(Myotis grisescens), Indiana bat(Myotis
sodalist), and northern long-eared bat(Myotis septentrionalis,NLEB). Section 7 Concurrence
Division 14 Office
Telephone: [phone] 253 Webster Road,Sylva,North Carolina 28779

430382 Page 2 December 9, 2021
Haywood County
was received for the project on July 30, 2019 in association with initial planning for the planned
replacement of this bridge (B-5900 federally funded). Due to the anticipated clearing of
approximately 25 trees, including some trees that are potentially suitable as roosts, a"may affect
but not likely to adversely affect" determination is applicable for Indiana bat.
Appalachian elktoe are found in some well-oxygenated, cool-water rivers with moderate to fast
flowing water and stable, mixed substrates of silt, sand, gravel, and/or cobble. This species is
present Haywood County in the Pigeon River watershed. However, Dutch Cove Creek is too
small to support mussels and the stream substrate is not suitable for mussels due to a heavy silt
load. Dutch Cove Creek flows into Hominy Creek which also is heavily impacted with
sedimentation. Natural Heritage element occurrence data for this species (NHP viewer checked
on October 1, 2021) do not include records in this watershed. The project should therefore have
no effect on this mussel.
Rock gnome lichen can be found on rock faces at relatively low elevations in deep river gorges.
A gorge or any rock faces with consistently humid conditions required by this plant are not
present at the bridge. Therefore, the project will have no effect on this species.
Small whorled pogonia usually occurs in open, dry, deciduous woods with acidic soil, though it
can sometimes be found on slopes along streams and mesic forest in association with white pine
and rhododendron. The habitats at the project site include a maintained road right-of-way,
forest, and shrub-scrub overgrown fields. Although forested habitats will be impacted by
construction there should be no effects of the project on pogonia because this plant has never
been observed near the bridge in the many site visit surveys (May 26, 2016, June 21, 2016, June
11, 2019, and October 4, 2021). Moreover, the ground conditions in the forested areas that will
be impacted by construction appear too shaded for this plant to occur due to thick ground and
mid-story vegetation.
Gray bats usually roost in caves or in/on structures year-round while Indiana bats and NLEB
only winter in caves or mines with stable, but not freezing, cold temperatures. During warm
seasons Indiana bats and NLEB usually roost on/in structures, under the shaggy bark of live trees
such as white oaks, sycamores, and hickories, or in cavities or under the loose peeling bark of
dead trees. Dutch Cove Creek is small and unlikely to serve as a foraging corridor for gray bats.
It also has poor quality substrate and thereby poor macroinvertebrate productivity that would
attract gray bats which typically forage over large waterbodies and streams/rivers.
There are no caves near the bridge. The bridge was surveyed for bats and evidence of bat
roosting on June 21, 2016 and June 11, 2019 and none were evident. Absence of bats and signs
of bat usage will not need to be confirmed since the bridge was destroyed by the flood.
This project will not require blasting, but it will require the removal of approximately 25 trees
(>3 inch diameter) and short-term (couple days)percussive activity(e,g. guardrail post driving).

430382 Page 3 December 9, 2021
Haywood County
A few trees to be removed appear suitable for bat roosting because they have peeling, loose, or
rough bark. Trees will be removed from October 16 to March 31 when active tree roosting by
bats is unlikely.
There should be no night work for construction and there will be no permanent lighting installed
on the project. There is no street lighting near the site and no other sources of light near the
bridge. Removal of trees for the bridge project should not appreciably increase the illumination
of the creek. For these reasons, and with the inclusion of"winter"tree clearing, we believe the
project"may affect but not adversely affect" Indiana bat and be compliant with the 4D rule for
NLEB.
Section 106
The project is not expected to have effects on 106 resources. There was a"no survey required"
determination rendered for archaeology. Consultation with the federally recognized tribes was
undertaken under emergency procedures with comments requested by October 8,2021. No comments
have been received to date. A determination of"no historic properties affected"was rendered for historic
architecture.
Impacts to Waters of the United States
The only jurisdictional feature in the project area that will be affected is Dutch Cove Creek. (DEQ Class:
Q. This creek has a large watershed and supports fish. It is believed to be Relatively Permanent Waters
and under the jurisdiction of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. In order to construct the project, it will
be necessary to impact Waters of the United States in the French Broad River Basin(HUC
06010105060010). Specifically,NCDOT is requesting to perform fills for temporary dewatering and rip
rap protection of unstable banks as specified in the following table.
Site No. Existing Condition Proposed Condition Perm. Temp.
Impacts Impacts
(Feet) (Feet)
1 Creek bank Stabilized bank at storm drain 11 10
outlet
2 Unstable creek banks Stabilized banks for new 44 52
bridge
3 Unstable creek bank Stabilized bank on road 30 10
shoulder/bridge approach
Total Permanent Stream Impact 85
Total Temporary Stream Impact 72
Compensatory mitigation has not been proposed because the permanent and temporary impacts are
minimal overall. Permanent impacts are for rip rap protection only and thereby do not constitute an
appreciable loss or diminution of aquatic habitat.

430382 Page 4 December 9, 2021
Haywood County
Permits Requested
NCDOT is hereby requesting authorization under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act to proceed with the
construction project outlined above. This application has been sent to the North Carolina Department of
Environmental Quality(DEQ),Division of Water Resources(DWR)because it will require a written GC
as well. By copy of this letter, I am asking Mr. Travis Wilson,Eastern NCDOT Review Coordinator of
the WRC,to comment directly to the regulatory agencies and myself concerning the Nationwide Permit
Verification and 401 WQC Written requests. Note,by email dated September 10,2021 Mrs. Chambers
has already noted that the WRC waived the trout moratorium for this emergency project.
Please contact me at(828)246-7078 if you have any questions about this application or need additional
information. Your prompt review and consideration of this request will be greatly appreciated.
� d b1y:
`/ - �2v—
8B673FBE42E5415...
Dave McHenry
Division 14 DEO
Enclosures
cc: Mr. Travis Wilson,Eastern NCDOT Review Coordinator,NCWRC, Creedmoor
Mr.Kevin Mitchell,Division of Water Resources—DEQ,Asheville
Attach/s

I I 1604 r\ �; • ' �` g ra„^� �Op� ICI
O1513 I 1585 t;,,,,•'-' 1613 f i 1631 1603 1O � . _ �
1552 1602 o ti
1588 � �Cb Or s
a a cM m 1 1131
1553 �
R0, 5� 1004
OI v 1
?WC)
0 �[� - z, as. i?•,y�;r 1590 1592 r`r�A �rrfsr 1598 ,1601 r4sRa� 1202 1200
LUG
,` Qti _ xsP; 1563 F
i :�F 1 Canto r ♦'� I I a C3, 1596 �}g T r
r r e01 CL
c1 �q 1495
F
e U I+I " 5� ►'�W +44 F. {.
X �m Crah trek- Leiceste+ 0`o:111 11• 65 1643 � �a 1593 - -. iJ5 74 W
O 1 US-19
D1
rnnk`, j a 1599 -
?� ® ® Sheville - 1554 1558 O 1594 �r''ast ilr ��pundf��9 Rt� 1600 1130
-
'�� alas 1580
v,o•d --_ _ e, 1560 �� S}•kew•tjle r
d2 •t;ar NS th - La. $Ftrriu i A
hl[[ C �Icr }. ' It•11V�'y
® '12 .`216 J ' St Cdffi011 1465
- Wayry�svi A,r,Mr Qrsyan tsi, Aver pack ,n1942 S 1836 S39(V1r{?. Dr
aeela,otl saav _ 1833
arIr k Y springia s ry.:i Pxwy �': '
m >, "I'hrP�'d Cvfdt4M ^ ` We\\•. 1940 �nA3t .
B6.5p �r.., 11Cr�.sc P IS G A H 1191,-f
o�GF � 5:`murst F 1 r wayp eb, Mills 41er e 1837 ��y1
2,s 4535 Nprr � 1840 J , .aw
ie H A T. [rodle of �'\ ly Morse ! ��1tr
1839 B-5900 , 4
ron�s F�,e,r,y Ste 1830
ar,rt 9ald cv LP 1 and S► 4 dohnSph 1
1 f -=� lvvkrn t;�
se�e�- R1dGF.5':i•i,i ■ 3Inras�'767:' '3` S 1946 w Or C C�
S 0 N. eee,, k fiend ,945 r e
1 5
1926 u @` kevie 1835
w t
1844 Q' i
ay 1937 0] S�1 ��VG 1850 - �� w
1846 �o Q 3 � O
1825 1826 r 11950 O ° 1851
- 1848 p p, 1 �p
1920 Tub
1918 '� rQ �
1823 1® 1 0
903 1854 n
1853
z Q.;.
1906 �Rd 1857
110 ,Qotl
O 1860 Q �urlg
1113
saL err
NMiona
1936 1862 P�nro 1847 q
Dk s `Q� �d Z`1861 1858 F©rant l
'' 1935 Jff o n 1864 ^� Bunn1899
N
1867 g Nei;
O Other Nearby STI P Project 1865 as Ln �r � F
1866 f3ae o °ge
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT VICINITY MAP Div: TIP#
OF TRANSPORTATION Replace Bridge No. 382 on SR 1835 0 0.5 14 8-5900 Figure
z DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS over Dutch Cove Creek in Haywood County I I I
Q PROJECT DEVELOPMENT AND Date:
ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS UNIT TIP Project B-5900 Miles IDECEMBER 2015
0F TPPN

Bridge 382 location _August 19,
2021-facing east.
' rY. p` r ►
�� may• . ��• - +ram sr•..F'„ • -� R mew
41
kw
•�� y �41,
•fir _ •. �,.
Ze­
1 _ f r
_ .1 r
Z�
Of
'�• �.-.
�1.
`i■f
R - •t�
� ti�

O�P�MgNT OF Ty�'2 use vICE
N
United States Department of the Interior
0
7 �7
FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
�9RCH 3 8�9 orTxe`
Asheville Field Office
160 Zillicoa Street Suite#B
Asheville,North Carolina 28801
July 30, 2019
Dave McHenry&Patrick Breedlove
NC Department of Transportation
Division 14
253 Webster Road
Sylva,NC 28779
Subject: 19-313, 19-314, 19-315, 19-316, 19-317, 19-318, 19-319, Section 7 Concurrence
for Bridge Replacements in Haywood, Macon, Graham, Clay and Jackson
Counties
Dear Mr. McHenry and Mr. Breedlove,
On July 1, 2019,we received your email requesting section 7 concurrence on effects the subject
projects may have on the federally threatened Indiana bat(Myotis sodalis) and northern long-
eared bat(NLEB,Myotis septentrionalis)4(d)Rule compliance notification. The following
comments are provided in accordance with section 7 of the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as
amended(16 U.S.C. 1531-1543) (Act).
You have committed to remove trees required for the projects during October 15t'to April 151n,
avoiding impacts to potentially roosting bats. Additionally, surveys for bats and evidence of
roosting bats were negative (see attached table for specific dates). You have also committed to
confirming the absence of bats and signs of bat usage before demolition. Accordingly,we concur
with your determinations that the proposed projects may affect,but are not likely to adversely
affect,the Indiana bat.
As outlined in the Biological Opinion completed on the 4(d)rule for the federally threatened
Northern long-eared bat (Myotis septentrionalis) on January 5, 2016,this activity is now
excepted from take prohibitions for Northern long-eared bat,based on the project location.
Project activities in the action area: (1) would not affect a known hibernation site; (2) are not
located within '/4 mile of a known hibernation site, or; (3) are not located within a 150' radius of a
known maternity (tree) site.
Therefore, we believe the requirements under Section 7(c) of the Endangered Species Act(ESA)
of 1973, as amended(16 U.S.C. 15 31 - 1543), are fulfilled. Obligations under Section 7 of the
ESA must be reconsidered i£ (1)new information reveals impacts of this identified action that
may affect listed species or critical habitat in a manner not previously considered, (2)this action
is subsequently modified in a manner that was not considered in this review, or(3) a new species
is listed or critical habitat is determined that may be affected by the identified action.
3

The attached table summarizes the details of each project and any additional comments. Included
in the table is the USFWS file number that will aid us in referencing the appropriate file in the
future. Please include this number in any future correspondence. If you have questions about
these comments please contact Ms. Claire Ellwanger of our staff at 828/258-3939, Ext. 42235.
Sincerely,
J net Mizzi
ield Supervisor
2

+-,
m c
-v,) E a,
L 'L E
O IZ — —
N E
C
E Q U -0 to C CD
aj ;taj LU
O U O O tLa Ln Z
f0 C a) i U p O
C L a1 a) U
NW in
++ E E 3 +, O
co O N —
Q Lu 4- C
Z E O •3 C N
SZ -i ON v 'O E
V ai
O N o Q L O
N o M
�k
aJ
LL
to M d' Ln 1.0 r� 00 rn
3
LL m m m m m m M
H Ol Ol Ql Ql m (n al
r-I rI rl
E E E E E E
v v N v v v
(U (U aj a) v a)
H V V) V) V) V)
L L L L L L
O O O O O O
O O O O O O N
co
�
W L L L L L L L
*� ai a) v a) ai v
a) E E E E E E
cn
i
LA w mo mo w
a) a) al aj
Z Z Z Z Z Z Z
01 Q1 r Ol Q1 rl rI
> O O O O O O O
L fV N N fV N N N
to rH a\I lzt Ln
f4 m l0 to t.0 l0 l0 l0 l0
O O O
3 3 3 °
O U
f0 f6 !6 fL0 Y �
U f6 m
u S O S O S t3 (D U
U
d
tw
t rl 00 rl O N
L N M M .-I 00 l0 rl
m m m m m m m m
O) 00
� rl rl
O O N 00 00
L N N O1 d d a1 O1 Q1 a)
a `^ r, r- In Ln In L�
co rI to ci L.0 m m m m

Project Tracking No.(Internal Use
16-01-0105
t , ' HISTORIC ARCHICTECTURE AND LANDSCAPES
NO SURVEY REQUIRED FORM
This form only pertains to Historic Architecture and Landscapes for this project. It
is not valid for Archaeological Resources. You must consult separately with the
Archaeology Group.
PROJECT INFORMATION
Project No: B-5900 County: Haywood
WBS No.: 48032.1.1 Document CE
Type.-
Fed. Aid No: BRZ-1835(001) Funding: ❑ State ® Federal
Federal ❑ Yes ® No Permit none
Permit(s): Type(s):
Proiect Description:
Replace Bridge No. 382 on SR 1835 (Israel Rd) over Dutch Cove Creek.
SUMMARY OF HISTORIC ARCHICTECTURE AND LANDSCAPES REVIEW
Description of review activities, results, and conclusions:
Review of HPO quad maps,relevant background reports,historic designations roster,and indexes was
undertaken on February 11,2016. Based on this review there are no NR, DE,LL, SL, or SS in the Area
of Potential Effects (APE).The Haywood County online tax data was utilized to check for structures
greater than 50 years of age. There are two standing structures in the APE greater than fifty years of age.
One house built in 1940 and another which was built in 1960. Neither of these properties retains the
architectural integrity to be eligible for National Register listing. The bridge itself,Haywood County
Bridge No. 382,was built in 1964. The structure does not exemplify any distinctive engineering or
aesthetic type and is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places. No survey is
required.
Why the available information provides a reliable basis for reasonably predictin,- that there
are no unidentirted sianifcant historic architectural or landscape resources in the proiect
area:
Using HPO GIS website and county tax data provides reliable information regarding the structures in the
APE. These combined utilities are considered valid for the purposes of determining the likelihood of
historic resources being present.
SUPPORT DOCUMENTATION
®Map(s) ❑Previous Survey Info. ®Photos ❑Correspondence ❑Design Plans
FINDING BY NCDOT ARCHITECTURAL HISTORIAN
Historic Architecture and Landscapes --NO SURVEY REQUIRED
NCDOT Architectural Historian Date
Historic Architecture and Landscapes NO SURVEY REQUIRED form for Minor Transportation Projects as Qualified in the 2007 Programmatic Agreement.
Page 1 of 3

a
J
2 �
a
7
0
rn ,i
Y
U
lV
m
Otl
N
v
m
W
J
A
N
O
O
= k
•
•
x
O
•
W
C
j..
t ,
b
C
O
d N
a�
U Q
00
N Z
�U
10
to N
f0�
C_N
O�
U� gg
jZ 2 RY •� t+ .k� _
IL
Historic Architecture and Landscapes NO SURVEY REQUIRED form for Minor Transportation Projects as Qualified in the 2007 Programmatic Agreement.
Page 2 of 3

403larl Rd
(;entart Ibn�CaroGu v •', ; i' � � �r � .t�F�enY-Apr 2013 t�`- i '1 d''"• �f� '; `, €d 4' - _�..-. `�
T t'��j' � .Z�.: `y3.. �` �1 ,tw7•; {'Y �-J f`f,t
7ftii
.
^=
Aif,qv�
AIR
Wodd Umled Stales NC Haywood Co..(�
Al
e!k;
i„
` �t+• �,�, t ;��`.. .,� �.t,�•y Y 1'j4 err ��,y
h �
{,
a e r F M � e
' 1�, 1 } '� t41.1, l.- 1 r•'1 t ..i :,.0 ; ;uW .rer 1,,� d {y � ��� -'�`S{1 i

— N
SR'1836
r
i
tc Cove Creek
i
I ,
of SORT" ° USGS MAP - Canton
�0�� NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT Div: TIP#
OF TRANSPORTATION Replace Bridge No. 382 on SR 1835 0 300 Figure
(,00
z DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS over Dutch Cove Creek in Haywood County I i I 14 B-5900
, PROJECT DEVELOPMENT AND Date:
?1 g�Q�< ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS UNIT TIP Project B-5900 Feet IDECEMBER 2015
OF TRp�

. S rr ••N' -� - A1 'tip
t
,ask` ,3 '" � .,�• � �.
14
Aft
mf
.. �-
�. � ,. qeY� � - ..7 .[. •' + !• A
.yam.
It
+
Of
+':w .'� � - � - • .� Ty ', *-�, • •� /,sue �3 1!f i'� '' 1
iWA
r � .y v fir' } •7�'� r►r � .
i �k a i ! c. � .H•r .4 �� S :i� �' .� rr�AqAT
.F•' i * r ;L s. Y'�R��[A yT_'�}• �i�r , % t r l
r YY�i i ,J tyy�r s' 7 [� t•
A.
to
.`
' i;+. .[ yyr .i i •IY :h j7r'r�-,'y'• .'f�1� �!� i �y+� '.`+� y ,�'• v �i ,
�� + !' 1 Cx ti: 4 - 1�•1►� ! ti .r ',i 'T �. r- # 'rA �+ �f �'.�•jr .
1 r' '#�- -r,,.� A,�• 4• :� .�.� 4- _ .Y �t .[, ~•1 SI r.
NORTHjr
ViORTIf
- •
OF TRANSPORTATION Replace Bridge No. 382 on SR 1835 Div: TTIP_#_� Figure
14 11
DIVISIONOF over •ve Creek in Haywood County
PROJECT • • Date:
ENVIRONMENTALProjectTIPi • � DECEMB 1
OF

I I 1604 r\ �; • ' �` g ra„^� �Op� ICI
O1513 I 1585 t;,,,,•'-' 1613 f i 1631 1603 1O � . _ �
1552 1602 o ti
1588 � �Cb Or s
a a cM m 1 1131
1553 �
R0, 5� 1004
OI v 1
?WC)
0 �[� - z, as. i?•,y�;r 1590 1592 r`r�A �rrfsr 1598 ,1601 r4sRa� 1202 1200
LUG
,` Qti _ xsP; 1563 F
i :�F 1 Canto r ♦'� I I a C3, 1596 �}g T r
r r e01 CL
c1 �q 1495
F
e U I+I " 5� ►'�W +44 F. {.
X �m Crah trek- Leiceste+ 0`o:111 11• 65 1643 � �a 1593 - -. iJ5 74 W
O 1 US-19
D1
rnnk`, j a 1599 -
?� ® ® Sheville - 1554 1558 O 1594 �r''ast ilr ��pundf��9 Rt� 1600 1130
-
'�� alas 1580
v,o•d --_ _ e, 1560 �� S}•kew•tjle r
d2 •t;ar NS th - La. $Ftrriu i A
hl[[ C �Icr }. ' It•11V�'y
® '12 .`216 J ' St Cdffi011 1465
- Wayry�svi A,r,Mr Qrsyan tsi, Aver pack ,n1942 S 1836 S39(V1r{?. Dr
aeela,otl saav _ 1833
arIr k Y springia s ry.:i Pxwy �': '
m >, "I'hrP�'d Cvfdt4M ^ ` We\\•. 1940 �nA3t .
B6.5p �r.., 11Cr�.sc P IS G A H 1191,-f
o�GF � 5:`murst F 1 r wayp eb, Mills 41er e 1837 ��y1
2,s 4535 Nprr � 1840 J , .aw
ie H A T. [rodle of �'\ ly Morse ! ��1tr
1839 B-5900 , 4
ron�s F�,e,r,y Ste 1830
ar,rt 9ald cv LP 1 and S► 4 dohnSph 1
1 f -=� lvvkrn t;�
se�e�- R1dGF.5':i•i,i ■ 3Inras�'767:' '3` S 1946 w Or C C�
S 0 N. eee,, k fiend ,945 r e
1 5
1926 u @` kevie 1835
w t
1844 Q' i
ay 1937 0] S�1 ��VG 1850 - �� w
1846 �o Q 3 � O
1825 1826 r 11950 O ° 1851
- 1848 p p, 1 �p
1920 Tub
1918 '� rQ �
1823 1® 1 0
903 1854 n
1853
z Q.;.
1906 �Rd 1857
110 ,Qotl
O 1860 Q �urlg
1113
saL err
NMiona
1936 1862 P�nro 1847 q
Dk s `Q� �d Z`1861 1858 F©rant l
'' 1935 Jff o n 1864 ^� Bunn1899
N
1867 g Nei;
O Other Nearby STI P Project 1865 as Ln �r � F
1866 f3ae o °ge
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT VICINITY MAP Div: TIP#
OF TRANSPORTATION Replace Bridge No. 382 on SR 1835 0 0.5 14 8-5900 Figure
z DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS over Dutch Cove Creek in Haywood County I I I
Q PROJECT DEVELOPMENT AND Date:
ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS UNIT TIP Project B-5900 Miles IDECEMBER 2015
0F TPPN

Project Tracking No.:
16-01-0105
o NO ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEY REQUIRED FORM
This form only pertains to ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES for this project. It is not
1
�. r valid for Historic Architecture and Landscapes. You must consult separately with the
� ' ✓ Historic Architecture and Landscapes Group.
PROJECT INFORMATION
Project No: B-5900 County: Haywood
WBS No: 48032.1.1 Document: CE
F.A. No: BRZ-1835(001) Funding: ❑ State ® Federal
Federal Permit Required? ® Yes ❑ No Permit Type: NWP& TVA
Project Description:
The project calls for the replacement of Bridge No. 382 on SR 1835 (Israel Road) over Dutch Cove Creek
in Haywood County. The archaeological Area of Potential Effects (APE)for the project is defined as a
1,600 foot(487.68 m) long corridor running 630 feet(192.02 m) east and 970 feet(295.66 m) west and
north from the center of Bridge No. 382. The corridor is approximately 200 feet(60.96 m) wide
extending 100 feet(30.48 m)from either side of the road's centerline.
SUMMARY OF CULTURAL RESOURCES REVIEW
Brief description of review activities, results of review, and conclusions:
The Bridge No. 382 replacement project is just west of Canton in the eastern portion of Haywood County,
North Carolina. The project area is plotted in the southern half of the Canton USGS 7.5'topographic
quadrangle(Figure 1).
A map review and site file search was conducted at the Office of State Archaeology(OSA)on February
8,2016. No previously recorded archaeological sites have been identified within or adjacent to the APE,
but one site(31 HW 164) is within a mile of the bridge. According to the North Carolina State Historic
Preservation Office online data base(HPOWEB 2016),there are no known historic architectural
resources within the APE that may yield intact archaeological deposits. Topographic maps,USDA soil
survey maps, aerial photographs(NC One Map),historic maps (North Carolina maps website), and
Google Street View application were examined for information on environmental and cultural variables
that may have contributed to prehistoric or historic settlement within the project limits and to assess the
level of ground disturbance.
The APE for Bridge 382 runs roughly east to west but turns north at its western end. Dutch Cove Creek,
which is crossed, drains to the north into Hominy Creek. These waterways are part of the French Broad
drainage basin. The project area is primarily situated in a narrow drainageway(Figure 2). A small
floodplain is found alongside the creek with small benches at either end of the project area. Strongly
sloping side slopes are also present. The area is mostly forested with scattered residential properties that
are open. Ground disturbance is mixed with the residential properties graded and level to accommodate
houses or mobile homes on the side slopes and floodplain.
According to the USDA soil survey, four soil types are found within the APE(see Figure 2). The
floodplain is composed of the Cullowhee-Nikwasi complex(CxA). This sandy loam series is somewhat
poorly drained to very poorly drained with a slope of less than 2 percent. It is also subject to frequently
flooding. It is unlikely significant cultural resources will be found on this series due to persistent wetness.
`No ARCHAEOLOGY SUR VEY REQUIRED"form for the Amended Minor Transportation Projects as Qualified in the 2015 Programmatic Agreement.
1 of 7

Project Tracking No.:
16-01-0105
The benches are made up of Saunook loam(SdC). This is a stony loam soil that is well drained and with
a slope of 8 to 15 percent. Inspection of benches with Google Street View shows that these areas are
smaller than depicted by the soil survey image. They are also dissected by small tributaries. Due to their
limited extent and erosion from dissection, a significant archaeological site is not likely to be encountered
within the project limits on this series. Lastly,the side slopes consists of the Hayesville-Urban land
complex(HeC)or the Evard-Cowee complex(EvE). Both of these series are well drained clay loams or
clays. The Hayesville-Urban land complex has a slope of 2 to 15 percent,but it appears to be greater than
15 percent when viewed by Google Street View. The Evard-Cowee Complex is much steeper with slope
at 30 to 50 percent. Slope of 15 percent or more is not usually tested since significant sites are not likely
to be found.
A review of OSA's site files shows few investigations or reviews carried out in the area. Only one site
(31HW164) is reported within a mile of the bridge and its location is suspect. This prehistoric site was
identified by the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill in 1964 during their archaeological study of
the Appalachian Summit. It is situated upstream in a wide floodplain made up of Dillsboro loam unlike
the current project area. Overall, further work is needed in the region to better understand settlement
patterns,but the scope and location of the current project area will not provide the necessary data.
A review of the historic maps suggests no evidence of a significant resource within the APE. The 1901
Asheville USGS topographic map shows Israel Road not crossing Dutch Cove Creek but continuing south
(Figure 3). The map also identifies Dutch Cove Creek as South Fork. Structures are plotted as well,but
appear to be located north of the project area. Structures on the eastside of Dutch Cove Creek suggest
that a road was present but not shown. The 1925 Soil Map for Haywood County displays a similar picture
with no changes(Figure 4). By the 1930s,highway maps begin to illustrate an unimproved road that is
similar to existing Israel Road. The 1938 Highway Map for Haywood County plots this road crossing
Dutch Cover Creek with the possibility of three structures near the APE(Figure 5). Regardless,none of
these structures have been recognized as significant.
Brief Explanation of why the available information provides a reliable basis for reasonably predicting
that there are no unidentified historic properties in the APE:
The defined archaeological APE for the proposed replacement of Bridge No. 382 in Haywood County is
unlikely to impact intact and significant archaeological deposits. This is due wet soils within the
floodplain, steep slopes, disturbance from grading and leveling for modern homes, and minimal extent of
suitable surface along the benches. As long as impacts to the subsurface occur within the defined APE,
no further archaeological work is recommended for the proposed replacement of Bridge No. 382. If work
should affect subsurface areas beyond the defined APE, further archaeological consultation might be
necessary.
Please note as well,this federally funded project requires a Tennessee Valley Authority(TVA)26(a)
permit and is subject to the conditions outlined in the 2003 joint letter from TVA and the Federal
Highway Administration(FHWA)to the North Carolina State Historic Preservation Officer(NCSHPO)
covering lead federal agency designations for Section 106 purposes. Copies of this form are being
provided to The Eastern Band of Cherokee Indians,The Cherokee Nation of Oklahoma and,The United
Keetoowah Band of Cherokee Indians on behalf of FHWA. A copy of this form is also being provided to
TVA for their use in their Section 106 compliance including Tribal consultations as appropriate.
"No ARCHAEOLOGYSUR VEY REQUIRED"form for the Amended Minor Transportation Projects as Qualified in the 2015 Programmatic Agreement.
2of7

Project Tracking No.:
16-01-0105
SUPPORT DOCUMENTATION
See attached: ® Map(s) ❑ Previous Survey Info ❑ Photos ❑Correspondence
❑ Photocopy of County Survey Notes Other: images of historic maps
FINDING BY NCDOT ARCHAEOLOGIST
NO ARCHAEOLOGY SUR VEY REO UIRED
2/17/16
C. Damon Jones Date
NCDOT ARCHAEOLOGIST
"No ARCHAEOLOGYSUR VEY REQUIRED"form for the Amended Minor Transportation Projects as Qualified in the 2015 Programmatic Agreement.
3 of 7

Project Tracking No.:
16-01-0105
One Mlle Radius(Shaded)
Around Project Area
'• -_ yp1 `.;rti, ���.��� ter:l � �:�:�-� _�
VV
J + �r L x�? lU .� 11 � �•�`� I � r•1,����4� - 11r �' I ��
s� '�� �i 'ar' �_� ��--� \� � fir'•\!!� J J�.1��1>-:
! * -+•rti ' { rl t f v 7 fir `` r v
� ' - '
��- _ f ` � Bridge 382 •r.r ��
�, ;. •° � �i ; 1;} APE Red} � 1 t
t6,
too
cif � ,• '1 7 I
' .\J r
fry
0 1 N
Miles
1..50© 1N E
Figure 1. Topographic Setting of the Project Area, Canton (1967; photorevised 1990),NC USGS 7.5'
Topographic Quadrangle.
"No ARCHAEOLOGYSUR VEY REQUIRED"form for the Amended Minor Transportation Projects as Qualified in the 2015 Programmatic Agreement.
4of7

Project Tracking No.:
16-01-0105
1;
.7f iy
t FL
1�
4
i .
r�
Bridge 382
APE(Red)
f
Contour at 20 feet
SoiIsTypes
o- 500 N
Fe et
vv E
150
Haywood Count},
Meters
Figure 2. Aerial photograph of the APE showing development, contours, and soils within and near the
project area.
"No ARCHAEOLOGYSUR VEY REQUIRED"form for the Amended Minor Transportation Projects as Qualified in the 2015 Programmatic Agreement.
5 of 7

Project Tracking No.:
16-01-0105
A ILA
'fe Ito, ir
i�� ' � � '.� `�. Project Area_ . -
4 iIN
r
_ } a +� h ♦ .r w
�"k i
• r,
Figure 3. The 1901 Asheville USGS topographic map showing the location of the project area.
w Project Area
C I
f• � ter.. .
-N,
v 1
Figure 4. The 1925 Soil Map for Haywood County showing the location of the project area.
`No ARCHAEOLOGY SURVEY REQUIRED"form for the Amended Minor Transportation Projects as Qualified in the 2015 Programmatic Agreement.
6of7

Project Tracking No.:
16-01-0105
■
L .� '�y •:
Project Are
001-0
• i
no •
4.
w
Figure 5. The 1938 North Carolina State Highway Map for Haywood County showing the location of the
project area.
`No ARCHAEOLOGY SURVEY REQUIRED"form for the Amended Minor Transportation Projects as Qualified in the 2015 Programmatic Agreement.
7of7

ST�7E.
05
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
ROY COOPER J.ERIC BOYETTE
GOVERNOR SECRETARY
September 21,2021
To: Dr. Wenonah Haire, THPO
Catawba Indian Nation
1536 Tom Steven Road
Rock Hill, SC 29730
Elizabeth Toombs,THPO
Cherokee Nation
PO Box 948
Tahlequah, OK 74465
Russell Townsend and Stephen Yerka,THPO
Eastern Band of Cherokee Indians
2077 Governors Island Road
Bryson City,NC 28713
LeeAnne Wendt,THPO
Muscogee(Creek)Nation
PO Box 580
Okmulgee, OK 74447
James Hartley, THPO
United Keetoowah Band of Cherokee Indians
PO Box 1245
Tahlequah, OK 74465
Subject: Tropical Storm Fred Bridge Replacements
DF17614 (FEMA) and 17614(Federal Highway Administration)
Haywood County,North Carolina
The North Carolina Department of Transportation(NCDOT)is pursuing the replacement of
several bridges that were destroyed or severely damaged in Haywood County,North Carolina by
tropical storm Fred on August 17,2021. Some communities only have temporary accesses which
need to be replaced soon with safer and reliable permanent structures. These bridge projects are
being reviewed by qualified archaeology staffs under NCDOT's 2021 Section 106 programmatic
agreement with the Federal Highway Administration,NC State Historic Preservation Office,US
Forest Service, and others. The replacement of five of the bridges may affect small areas of
ground adjacent to the roads that appear previously undisturbed by highway construction. To
assist in our Section 106 review,we would appreciate advisement concerning the potential
presence of any archaeological resources in the vicinity the bridges.
Attached to this transmittal are maps of bridge locations. The subject bridges include:
Mailing Address: Telephone:[phone] Location:
NC Department of Transportation Fax:[phone] NC Department of Transportation
Division 14 Customer Service: 1-877-368-4968 Division 14
253 Webster Road Website:www.ncdot.gov 253 Webster Road
Sylva NC 28779 Sylva NC 28779

2
Site 151
430003 (Haywood County Bridge 3)
DF 17614.2044034
35.417799,-82.811311 Decimal Degrees
Site 143
430005 (Haywood County Bridge 5)
DF 17614.2044031
35.428620,-82.798567 Decimal Degrees
Site 28
430026(Haywood County Bridge 26)
DF 17614.2044014
35.566797,-82.801006 Decimal Degrees
Site 55
430382(Haywood County Bridge 382)
D1717614.2044019
35.521909,-82.814467 Decimal Degrees
In accordance with Section 106 of the NHPA,we request any comments that you may be able to
share regarding the proposed projects. Be assured that,in accordance with confidentiality and
disclosure stipulations in Section 304 of the NHPA,we will maintain strict confidentiality about
certain types of information regarding historic properties. Your comments may be included in
NEPA or NC Environmental Policy Act documentation.
Please contact me at [e-mail] or(828)586-2141 if you have any questions or need
additional information. Due to the urgency of this particular situation,we request any comments
by October 8,2021 so that we can identify any potential project issues quickly while also
moving forward with the much-needed actions. We greatly appreciate your attention to this
matter.
gi�ied by:
r
E2�B67Y3,BCYlenry
15
Dave lvl
Division 14 Environmental Officer
Cc:
M. Wilkerson,NCDOT Human Environment Unit
G. Hoops,FHWA
Attach:
NCDOT Haywood County major bridge damage maps—August 2021

Site 151
Haywood Bridge 3 �_�
Green outline = anticipated disturbance limits
(Red outline = approximate footprint new structure)
// t 3 ;
- � � � ��+�..a•'�"'� ll�f x # {i `'d i r'# ram..-•':ram•
r xl ..y {. r f '{ + • i r*# }' iifllrr� M
Pe
71 x }
.40
M ISO
;ss5
9
14,5rAIN BUNCOIV
-82.811311 35.417799 Decim,.i Degrees {y,
T 1 61
F � i 2:�'3•
HENDER
J SON
1
4 1 TRANSYLVANIA
50 25 0 50 CON
Feet 1 �NCDOT GIS Unit

Site 143 }
Haywood Bridge 5
(Green outline = anticipated disturbance limits)
(Red outline = approximate footprint new structure) #. t '
',* x
+� ► 1 !'1
\ X
24
J+,f
RL
�O'O � r • 4 M ISON,--Aj
� . y
s
s� :elf �_ rAIN BUNCOIV
4
'
` } -82.798567 35.428620 Decimal Degrees
i ,'r 2_7,3', HENDER�
J SON
�50 25 0 50 MACON TRANSYLVANIA
Feet - - ' �T
1 �NCDOT GIS Unit

ILI
'4 Ff Jr'
Site 28
Haywood Bridge 26
(Green outline = anticipated disturbance limits) " , _ 4 � . ' � r
(Red outline = approximate footprint new structure)
�k _ - f
-82.801006 35.566797 Decimal Degrees , f,-
% r
f
M ISO skl 251)
9
.s
CtIVAIN BUNCOM
t5
151�
+ HENDE
R
J SON
- NSY NIA
50 25 0 50 CON
' Fee 1 �NCDOT GIS Unit

Site 55
Haywood Bridge 382 rill
(Green outline = anticipated disturbance limits) S 4 J f
Red outline = a roximate foot rint new structure �. � v '- {
kv
h * • * ty ff Ir ; / I` life` }
CL
_ dh
-82.814467 35.521909 Decimal Degrees
NN
M ISO
0382 9
_rAIN BUNCOIV
L21
15i .
HENDERS
J SON
1
1 50 25 0 50 MACON TRANSYLVANIA
Feet . _ , �NCDOT GIS Unit

Hi h North Carolina Department of Transportation
gStorwamwater
Highway Stormwater Program
STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN
(Version 3.00;Released August 2021) FOR NCDOT PROJECTS
WBS Element: BP14.R004 TIP/Prof No: BP14.R004 County(ies): Haywood Page 1 of 2
General Project Information
WBS Element: BP14.R004 ITIP Number: 1BP14.R004 Project Type: Bridge Re lacement I Date: 11/23/2021
NCDOT Contact: Garrett Higdon Contractor/Designer: NV5 Engineers&Consultants/David Bocker, PE
Address: 253 Webster Road Address: 7500 East Independence Blvd.
Sylva, NC 28779 Suite 100
Charlotte, NC 28227
Phone: [phone] Phone: [phone]
Email: [e-mail] Email: [e-mail]
City/Town: Canton County(ies): Haywood
River Basin(s): French Broad I CAMA County? I No
Wetlands within Project Limits? Yes
Project Description
Project Length(lin.miles or feet): 365 ft Surrounding Land Use: Varies- Primarily Woodlands with adjacent rural residential areas
Proposed Project Existing Site
Project Built-Upon Area(ac.) 0.2 lac. 0.2 lac.
Typical Cross Section Description: Roadway-2 @ 10'Lanes with 3'unpaved shoulder. Existing Roadway- 19'Bridge Width(Out to Out)with no marked lanes or shoulders.
Annual Avg Daily Traffic(veh/hr/day): Design/Future: Year:I Existing:1 <400 1 Year:1 2016
General Project Narrative: The project consists of the bridge replacement(existing span 1 @ 25-6")of Bridge#430382 over Dutch Cove Creek in Haywood County. Existign ditches are being maintained
(Description of Minimization of Water as much as possible;however,shoulder berm gutter is being used in several locations to minimize project footprint and reduce cut slope length. As such,several storm drainge
Quality Impacts) systems and ditches are proposed to convey roadway runoff to the creek. Bridge does not require deck drainage,thus there is no direct discharge into the creek from the bridge.

/]f auK x Wx cyi
Hi h}``vl}a l` /�� North Carolina Department of Transportation
Stor �l V v,atcl k a
Highway Stormwater Program =fir
STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLANw•^�`"�
(Version 3.00; Released August 2021) FOR NCDOT PROJECTS
WBS Element: BP14.R004 TIP/Prof No.: BP14.R004 County(ies): Haywood Page 2 of 2
General Project Information
Waterbody Information
Surface Water Body(1): Dutch Cove Creek NCDWR Stream Index No.: 6-76-1
NCDWR Surface Water Classification for Water Body Primary Classification: Class C
Supplemental Classification:
Other Stream Classification:
Impairments:
Aquatic T&E Species? No Comments:
NRTR Stream ID: Buffer Rules in Effect: N/A
Project Includes Bridge Spanning Water Body? iYes Deck Drains Discharge Over Buffer? INo Dissipator Pads Provided in Buffer? INo
Deck Drains Discharge Over Water Body? INo (If yes, provide justification in the General Project Narrative) (If yes, describe in the General Project Narrative; if no, justify in the
(If yes, provide justification in the General Project Narrative) General Project Narrative)
Surface Water Body (2): NCDWR Stream Index No.:
NCDWR Surface Water Classification for Water Body Primary Classification:
Supplemental Classification:
Other Stream Classification:
Impairments:
Aquatic T&E Species? Comments:
NRTR Stream ID: Buffer Rules in Effect:
Project Includes Bridge Spanning Water Body? Deck Drains Discharge Over Buffer? Dissipator Pads Provided in Buffer?
Deck Drains Discharge Over Water Body? (If yes, provide justification in the General Project Narrative) (If yes, describe in the General Project Narrative; if no, justify in the
(If yes, provide justification in the General Project Narrative) General Project Narrative)
Surface Water Body (3): 1 NCDWR Stream Index No.:
NCDWR Surface Water Classification for Water Body Primary Classification:
Supplemental Classification:
Other Stream Classification:
Impairments:
Aquatic T&E Species? Comments:
NRTR Stream ID: Buffer Rules in Effect:
Project Includes Bridge Spanning Water Body? Deck Drains Discharge Over Buffer? Dissipator Pads Provided in Buffer?
Deck Drains Discharge Over Water Body? (If yes, provide justification in the General Project Narrative) (If yes, describe in the General Project Narrative; if no, justify in the
(If yes, provide justification in the General Project Narrative) General Project Narrative)

430382 STATE STATE PROJECT REFERENCE NO. SHEET TOTAL
co N® SHEETS
LID
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINAN.C. BP14 . RO04 I
DIVISION O HIGHWAYSSTATE PROJ.NO. F.A.PROJ.NO. DESCRIPTION
mm t 4 =M / XXXXXX ------------ — P.E.
V XXXXXX RIW, UTI L
hu
oao,
C C150
x 4 rch St.
aC148
n o
---------- ----------- -----------
• v. ,a Gr sonto OD
4�* I I
W HAYWOOD COUNTY
---------- ----------
"4* a Holtzcla v ---------- ------------ -----------
�a » r
o a
T w.a ✓
k 9
Farm Rd. �. LOCATION: BRIDGE NO. 430382 OVER DUTCH COVE CREED
GI N W PLANS COMPLETE
JE P JECT ``
ON SR 1835 (ISRAEL RD)
s
aPERMIT DRAWING
.o Star St �' TYPE OF WORK: GRADING, DRAINAGE, PAVING, AND STRUCTURE
a
SHEET 1 OF 5
Eie orning Star l°dy CQ�e Rd.
o r4
y 8 WETLAND AND SURFACE WATER IMPACTS PERMIT
g
i
VICINITY MAP Sr
✓S� ✓s N
s,
_T_F `0�
ISM--,-
---- Q
O DUTCH COVE CREEK
Js ✓s
SITE 1
—TEMPORARY DETOUR
EDGE OF PAVEMENT
SITE 3
�_✓s ✓s \�s
-- is \ END BRIDGE
✓s �� —L— STA. 14 + 44
\ +/— TO CRITTER
'
- \---------- s
\ \ CREEK RD
All—
)10
�--------------
\ - -------- J -- ----------
�� V RD ------
--------- ---- ---- --, JS�
-------------
-- - -
---------------------------—
—1SRAEL RD—
SR 1835
BEGIN PROJECT BP14.R004 ✓S��-�,5 -- - -----
-L- STA. 12 + 25.00
7D
v BEGIN BRIDGE y
SITE 2 —L— STA. 14 + 04 +/—
t
END PROJECT BP14.R004
-L- STA. 15 + 90.00 O
J DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
o CLEARING ON THIS PROJECT SHALL BE PERFORMED TO THE LIMITS ESTABLISHED BY METHOD ??? UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
i THIS PROJECT IS NOT WITHIN ANY MUNICIPAL BOUNDARIES
0
E GRAPHIC SCALES DESIGN DA TA PROJECT LENGTH 7NV550 ENGINEERS&CONSULTANTS,INC.
HYDRA ULICS ENGINEER
O 5 E.INDEPENDENCE BLVD, TE 00
ADT 2016 — < 400NV5 CH RLOTrE,NC 04.53 .7300 227
P:704.537.7300 www.NV5.com
NC License#F-1333
> 100
55 0 0 55 0 100 formerly CALYX Engineers&Consultants n 0 r
w K = WA FOR THE NORTH CAROLINA DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION
Uj D — N/A 2018 STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS ----------------------- QQ o Q
�O
PLANS LENGTH ROADWAY TIP PROJECT BP14.R004 ............ 0.061 Miles
T = WA CHRIS D. ANDERSON P.E. 0
cl� LENGTH STRUCTURE TIP PROJECT BP14.R004 0.008 Miles RIGHT OF WAY DATE: , PE SIGNATURE:
11 50 25 0 50 100 V = 25 MPH ••••••••••• PROJECT ENGINEER
i-CO C * TOTAL LENGTH TIP PROJECT BP14.R004 0.069 Miles NOVEMBER 2021 ROADWAY DESIGN ', a
TTST = WA DUAL WA ••••••••••••••••••
PROFILE HORIZONTAL LETTING DATE: ENGINEER
—� ) FUNC CLASS = REGAN L. CAREATHERS, PE
N U J �� 5 �� 20 LOCAL NOVEMBER 2021 PROJECT DESIGN ENGINEER
0 L SUB REGIONAL TIER --
�U)
GARRETT HIGDON
PROFILE (VERTICAL) NCDOT CONTACT: DIVISION PROJECT ENGINEER SIGNATURE. PE

PROJECT REFERENCE NO. SHEET NO.
BPAR004 4
C3 RiW SHEET NO.
ROADWAY DESIGN HYDRAULICS
ENGINEER ENGINEER
I I I
I I I
STREAM & WETLAND IMPACTS
DENOTES TEMPORARY
IMPACTS IN SURFACE WATER
DENOTES IMPACTS IN 2Q
SURFACE WATER DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
II rm NV5 ENGINEERS&CONSULTANTS, INC.
I I 7500 E. INDEPENDENCE BLVD, STE 100
CHARLOTTE, NC 28227
P: 704.537.7300 www.NV5.com
NC License#F-1333
135900-G102
/ PERMIT DRAWING
/ REBAR
SHEET 2 OF 5
� / o
RONALD L. RATHBONE REBAR 'o
DB 452 PG 926 JENNIFER R. EARLEY
PLAT CAB C SLIDE 1330 '�F'G� MICHAEL G. EARLEY
I I ° / �s 0 ���' 2 Pa . DB 452 PG 932
I I �* • G PLAT CAB C SLIDE 1330
sr
40" OAK � O
III / S
ITE 1 98.
/ \ 0 JS
/ _ \✓s `JS CHRIST HER M. RATHBONE
J T. RATHBONE
WOODS / - \ 2 n ESTAT FILE 2013E PG 105 ��` ECIABINETSTING RC SLIDE 1330/W PER T
I I / O DB 452 P T\-� , •
$ a �JS�� SELENE FINANCE, LP PLAT CAB C SLIDE 1330 0�
_____________ I DB 902 PG 940 FF�
Z I I / - B PLAT CAB C SLIDE 4792 X S k �o
p I I 3 ' ------------ �k
BRIANA J. SINGLETON'`, \,
N III _ DB 710 PG 807 END PR ECG' BP14.R004 k
w I I �h DB 710 PG 809 SBG LIMITS:
Fp B R�L PLAT CAB C SLIDE 4792 -L- PT StG. 12+44.64 BEG 14+50.69 \ P�
�S END 15+60.00 -� may•
OFF 10.67 LT \
��� � �� � �s� x k ,,,\., L- POC Sta. + 90.00 S �. .
I I Z �, coZ�O P� 0R EBAR -L- PC StG. 13+48.39
vo X s R° �S �0 �\ B- SPECIAL CUT V ���T
gR '01�-- \ \JS S SOli RIP RAP AT EMBANKMEN DETAIL 4BDITCH E L- P C �tG 46+34.02 /S WELT 2 �W 6�y �`•
i �- S 5 MTL S JS re SEE DETAIL 4C FD
I �O ---- `� RP79AR r -, m R�ann GI01 I
I ��s� '' ��✓S wo Ds i - PT to. 17+75.63 ,
WOODS \S �� GRADE S ARID V 3 L POT Sto. I8+73.02
I I \ \ �� DRAIN / SEE BIRD
REMOVE 3@72 1 TAIL 4F FEED R + '
I \ is./
S UT �rs WOODS -
I I \ r re C✓ OVE -re PIPES y� RETAIN • ;XM WOODS
I I ------ CREEK -�� e E 0 + PIPE SHOWN AT j GR PASTURE \ �
I I \ \ BL-4 \, E T ,�1RION + SI \
I I .• \ \``•`` ` .• ,� 3SBW � EXISTING W �- -
WOODS \ \\ GR WOODS re�i�e� E OSED SR,ORKCyIV C X- _J
G --
\. \ \ E w ASH AREA i --------t ------ -------
TAIN`nQ'� a F�� 12'GR ------------ -------------------------- -- -------°-- ,- - - - ----- --X---------XWW---- W X --------X-----'X----------------------------------------
I -- o _-'-------TtI ITB�TB J. --------------------------- SB9'G_R_
-------- ------- ---
3 &I
I PC StG. 10+0 0 \� Rp --_�\P tB S� MP ------ ---------------- 24"rCMP------------------------------- --- ------- -------
J- _ I/L
\ S
is
�W PK� P- - EXISTING _
I I NAIE _o -- ------- e F t ( RxvNe
ETAIN t, 'GR I P 3
_ /5 m
HTR o � I RETAIN
I 1 SECONDARY / ---'r / �'19'C \ ✓s
I -L- PRC StG. l0+ 5 WOODS k 4SBw E = F \� GROWTH fI W \ ) SW
\ N I `, `4 CON
I - - - E �k RIP � �� � a ; W �` -
z DECK
50' A / �A- OFc,� \ BM
TRANSIT►o �' 4
I I m
III N SITE 3 N , ;------ o o��
III SITE 2 �TB/ - rn T l6'GR \ \ SEWER yR
I I STONERIDGE HOUSING GROUP, LLC SBG LIMITS: SPE L CUT V ALARM WOODS
I I • DB 765 PG 2023 BEG 12+60.00 CHANNEL AT DIT I
I I PLAT CAB C SLOT 3058 `u � b
END 13+75.00 BRIDGE TYPICAL \--- SEE EC � II9'CO `� ` 0
I I OFF 10.67' RT SEE DETAIL 4D �. . - /P K SryNC` N RI HOUSING S ,0 DGE OUS G LLC MARK A.
2 TON CLASS B RIP RAP BM 2 WOODS DB 765 PG 2023 CATHLYN A
I �h 7 SY GEOTEXTILE -L- PRC Sto. I5+63.17 a uT^ pLA1 CAB C SLOT 3058 \ PIA�B 88n8
I 1 -01 DETAIL 4C 25 TON CLASS RIP RAP
RIP RAP AT EMBANKMENT 25 SY GEOTEXTILE
I �I SEE DETAIL 4E
i (Not to Scale) + \
BEGIN PR O E C T BP14.R 004 ,D'min. -L- PCC S/G. 15+97.52
I �1 Ditch 1.0'min. 1.5'
Grade
-L- POC Sta. 12 + 25.,00 -L- PRC Sto. 17+00.23
I I � GEOTEXTILE
I 1 =1 Type of Liner= 10 TONS,CL-I Rip-Rap
Geotextile= 12 SY
I �I FROM -L- STA. 13+70 LT
co
P1 Sto 10+42.44 P1 StG 1/+65.43 P1 StG 14.57.37 P/ StG 15+80.35
3
DETAIL 4A p = 3° 0/' //.0" (RT) � = 18° 181 35.8" (LT) � = 23° 53' 42.4" (LT) � = 2° 42' 53.1" (RT)
L SPECIAL CUT DITCH D = 3° 33' 3/.5" D = //* 27' 33.0" D = //* 07' 31.4" D = 7° 54' 10.3"
� (Not to Scale)
Front L = 84.85' L = 159.78' L = 214.78" L = 34.35'
o< Ditch T = 42.44' T = 80.58' T = 108.97' T = 17.18'
Natural 7. het Slope
0 Ground ?, D F�a R = 1,6/0.00' R = 500.00" R = 5/5.00' R = 725.00'
E Min. D= 1 Ft. SE = EXIST SE = EXIST SE = 04 SE = EXIST
o V = 25 MPH DETAIL 4D DETAIL 4E DETAIL 4F
STANDARD 'V' DITCH
FROM -L- STA. 14+75 TO 15+25 RT RO = 60 CHANNEL AT BRIDGE TYPICAL BANK STABILIZATION (Not to Sale)
> NOT TO SCALE NOT TO SCALE
L (LEFT TO RIGHT LOOKING DOWNSTREAM) (LEFT TO RIGHT LOOKING DOWNSTREAM)
W + + + PROPOSED BRIDGE AND WALL EXISTING Natural
P1 Sto 16 15.90 P1 Sto 16 67.14 P1 Sto 17 37.93 PROPOSED GRADE EXISTING Natural FAA
l6° 43 37.2 (RT) = 4° 11 30.4 (RT) ° GROUND Ground
DETAIL 4B _ p = 2 09' 36.5" (LT) ----- ----- ---- ---- --- ----- -------- ------__ _ GROUND... gRiFs D o`� Ground
SPECIAL CUT DITCH ° ° . „ ° ; �2.0!
D = 45 50 //.8 D = 6 19 51.7 D = 2 5/ 53.2 �a
(Not to Scale) CLAS$ T RI �^��"�;^;i.r� LASS '1'RIP ; ;y� APSS 'll'RIP
Front itch L = 36.49' L = 66.2/' L = 75.40' ;1 Min. D= 1 Ft.
Natural D 1° < Slop T = 18.38' T = 33.12' T = 37.71' �° , ° �!; 1 $ FROM -L- STA. 15+90 TO STA. 16+35 LT
CO CCJ Ground �qR/�S D �\o e R = 125.00' R = 905.00" R = 2,000.00'
N D Min. D= 1 Ft. SE = EXIST SE = EXIST SE = EXIST EXISTING STRE M WIDTH EXISTING RE WIDTH
0 1- EST TONS CLASS '11'=115 TONS EST TONS CLASS '11'=26 TONS ALL STRUCTURE ANCHOR UNITS ARE TYPE B-77
o� FROM -L- STA. 15+75 TO 15+90 LT EST GEOTEXTILE= 113 SY EST GEOTEXTILE= 25 SY ALL GUARDRAIL END UNITS ARE TL-2
'= L
DDE= 245 CY
LENGTH= 71 FT FOR -L- PROFILE SEE SHEET 5

•
•
V� ,�+• . j � I � 1� /1 .
I � � / 1 r • \I _ O �
��%� 1 � 1 e ��. '.���`� » �". ;� n. �YI/// �.` . . ., '� � � ,III :.. ,: s� �■ . :• e� 'r _ '� \ �♦
, �� / 1, � ♦, ,`CAI ^Ir.� , ,r I_l,i i. 1 ��� .�r�, J •• - . . . - 1.: '': _, � �� `.
MEN
t!"g
FAR
,i/I' . •• � ,�''' =��� i ✓f`-�=� ��;�� :� „'� � �� .� �ii��/N,diii/ i,I�l�ll mr�lid//�i/��i ti � Li � �. �� � .. ��R ,� -
4 NO
M0. ��Ii�����`'T11 �, � � `1�� ` \ ♦ � � � -
O �� 1 �!1'1/'i� O� ``11 `` �•. � \` ..� � �� yam/ .. i •11• • ��� \` �►��
�` - � �`�```�, �Y \ mil.•�.•,���o�- �:� I � • I � \�����-'.
�• � \ � ����! `t�\� `\S: `: lnw
Mr
j'11O mi
,` � B'dTiles, \ ! : \ •r ~,+' \� �
�`-��\��.f��—�. '-.:•:. ��.. _ I I =��\,.�:.,^�� aY:���!\tea •��r`�� ����/ � \\:
Y-I /r • v;
+ �71"1T= % i'� . \• �`
•.. .y
l77� � y\�` i•_ :\� 7f:•�J •t, :Y r III
\�\ /'� �3� ."_�% % yr •. J i• - • - ���\\\��
N
RM
/
rer ;,4 �`fi - J `���:�:•�.a • �_a/ �'■ sir Vt, I�� ` �\��•��•� - �• !I a -,,• i, ■•
- - r
_ _
wow
01"
• ♦ --.Mow WNP
r
Wrfo el
qM M-2 JERE-
MEMO
PIWAK
NO
�� ► 1 .- :�e,.��
���� ': �■1�a•I=L �I�V��� - ��.�Qi r.��i�r.�' �:.•.� :..�� �� .•_. , �.. •• wr •• T 1 �7r � �
filialr►iC�r��.�•r.� _ .��fa . �.� ' t Ir/ y- Pi. _n s. �r / -t�
B ' �� � �•� � � �' �•� I ��� � �►�1 i • � • •• � �=:�!'-i •• ..v-��►' 'tit �� �•
11111 VIP
IWO
NO
ll I
. . . . . ..
.• , . ,
1 � • I.I I I I.I I .I I I I rx :.c
•
II •I 1I 111.11 �• �•
I 1
11

PROJECT REFERENCE NO. SHEET NO.
BPAR004 4
co RiW SHEET NO.
ROADWAY DESIGN HYDRAULICS
ENGINEER ENGINEER
SITE 2
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
NV5 ENGINEERS&CONSULTANTS, INC.
7500 E. INDEPENDENCE BLVD, STE 100
N V 5 CHARLOTTE, NC 28227
P: 704.537.7300 www.NV5.com
D40 / )
I I NC License#F-1333
4 + 24 SP / N
9 PERMIT DRAWING
SHEET 4 OF 5
12 00 13 00 14 00 15 00 16 00
- _ _ - - _ P. = 8 °2
- - - - A 15 6
HIGH 1 E E ) -
° Or
IAI
—_
9
O IT / &E-A.A ILI- Is
W
W
U
W o
� o 0
O
U
S
O
0
�Llu 0 YV �A P �1 V Lp 11 )1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
CA
W
W
W
W
O
S
CD
W
O1
C
3
ro
L
0
ro
C
O
L
C
O
L
C
W
CJ�
W
W
O
N ro ro
O L
CV—o
\ 71
rq-L
(V/

WETLAND AND SURFACE WATER IMPACTS SUMMARY
WETLAND IMPACTS URFA E WATER IMPACTS
Hand Existing Existing
Permanent Temp. Excavation Mechanized Clearing Permanent Temp. Channel Channel Natural
Site Station Structure Fill In Fill In in Clearing in SW SW Impacts Impacts Stream
No. (From/To) Size / Type Wetlands Wetlands Wetlands in Wetlands Wetlands impacts impacts Permanent Temp. Design
(ac) (ac) (ac) (ac) (ac) (ac) (ac) (ft) (ft) (ft)
1 -L- 13+70 Bank Stabilization < 0.01 < 0.01 11 10
2 -L- 13+84/14+57 Bank Stabilization < 0.01 0.04 44 52
3 -L- 15+62/15+91 Bank Stabilization < 0.01 < 0.01 30 10
TOTALS*: < 0.01 0.04 85 72 0
*Rounded totals are sum of actual impacts
NOTES:
NC DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
11/23/2021
Haywood County
BP14.R004
Revised 2018 Feb SHEET 5 OF 5

3 Hydric Rating by Map Unit—Haywood County Area, North Carolina 3
(Bridge 382)
N N
W W
335470 335480 335490 335500 335510 335520 335530 335540 335550 335%0
35o 31'21"N 35'31'21"N
o_
o_
M
o^
IX�Yr"1
fi
M
N
}
0
_v
v `o�
R
N
II - 11INII I
35o 31'17'N 35o 31'17'N
335470 335480 335490 335500 335510 335520 335530 335540 335550 335560
3 3
Map Scale:1:652 if printed on A portrait(8.5"x 11")sheet.
Meters
N 0 5 10 20 30
Feet
0 30 60 120 180
Map projection:Web Mercator Comer coordinates:WGS84 Edge tics:UTM Zone 17N WGS84
U}DA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 12/9/2021
Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 1 of 5

McHenry, David G
From: Chambers, Marla J
Sent: Friday, September 10, 2021 3:37 PM
To: McHenry, David G
Subject: RE: Storm Damage
Correction—I just heard back on the trout. We agree to waive the trout moratorium for these storm repairs.
Marla
Marla Chambers // NCDOT Coordinator
Habitat Conservation Program
NC Wildlife Resources Commission
12275 Swift Road
Oakboro, NC 28129
mobile: [phone]
Marla.chambers(cDncwildlife.org
ncwildlife.org
0 91 n
From: Chambers, Marla J
Sent: Friday, September 10, 2021 3:33 PM
To: McHenry, David G <[e-mail]>
Subject: RE: Storm Damage
Hi Dave! Sorry about not making the field meeting this week. I was in the field in Div. 11 doing hellbender surveys mainly
at bridge projects. I had not heard back from the Biologists yet so I sent them another request. I'll try to have a response
on the trout early next week. If you need to discuss further, I'll be available until 4 pm today.
Marla
Marla Chambers // NCDOT Coordinator
Habitat Conservation Program
NC Wildlife Resources Commission
12275 Swift Road
Oakboro, NC 28129
mobile: [phone]
Marla.chambers(cDncwildlife.org
ncwildlife.org

From: McHenry, David G<[e-mail]>
Sent: Friday, September 10, 2021 12:05 PM
To: Chambers, Marla J <[e-mail]>
Cc:Amschler, Crystal C CIV USARMY CESAW (USA)<[e-mail]>; Mitchell, Robert K
<[e-mail]>; Barnett, Kevin H <[e-mail]>
Subject: Storm Damage
Importance: High
Hey Marla,
Hope you are well.
Please see below a map depicting most of the repair sites we have been dealing with in Haywood County following the
recent storm Fred. We have many in Transylvania as well. Most of all the sites shown in red have been fixed already,
many did not even affect streams but were pavement repairs or debris removal. But, in the blue shading are the sites or
areas where we would appreciate an okay, if possible,to proceed with ongoing work into the trout moratorium due to
urgency.
The two northernmost sites are bridges included in what I sent to you all earlier. These are on poor quality streams and
likely not trout issues as well.
The 3 southern sites and the circle around several sites are all on trout water. Two of them are bridge replacement and
were included in information I sent before. One additional site (bridge 420 on West ForkPigeon River) has a slide that
we need to fix relatively soon as well (see picture 89). That slope is still sloughing and I suspect will continue to do so
over winter because of freeze/thaw and the site's high elevation. The circle with several sites is where several of us
looked at damage on Tuesday. An example of the damage in this area is shown in attached picture DSCN5928.
Repairs to shoulders will generally involve mostly the placement of clean boulders or rip rap at the pre-strorm creek
bank alignments. The bridge work will mostly involve rip rap placement, though there will be stream disturbance for
temporary pipe crossing removal and channel restoration as well.
I hope this information helps. We would appreciate any thoughts you have on proceeding with this work into the trout
moratorium. I know you reccommended to Crystal earlier on that we should do work quick as possible, but we please
just need confirmation that includes work into the trout moratorium if needed. Even though these are emergency
actions,we have design work to complete on the bridges in next few weeks, so it is likely work on these bridges would
be starting late next month or November, if we can.
Thanks and please let me know if you have any questions or need additional information.
Dave
2

Fred Aug 2021 sites-ArcMap
a a❑ ® itr x Q
Drawing- C>• Q y ' ' Mal v 10 ,] 13 I U A Y 4+ Y •
File Edit View Bookmarks Insert 5elecbon Geoprocessin] Customize Windows Hetp
Table Of Contents x
r �
G Layers
ii ® NCDOTBridgel-ocations
© 2021 Fred Severe Weather
`4 ryg
r_i JZ surveyPoint
# 2021 TS Fred
�-J Ed hydrp24k A _o
Haywaod 26 bridge replacementon tributary to North Hominy $
[v] LRS_Route
Z
a 0 6100_arc
G ❑ Div14 ;v
1 r 178
178
459 �j, ■' f
3 1 M -------
10423122
ke
3 ter,- y �•? �30 � ��
a �a
FiDA 338
41 4
I
319 r
1
bridge 420 on West Fork Pigeon
�1Q �
110
a
f EY+ .!� 1�
5
c a �.�i F1 Q� Ii c
® 0 Type here to search
3

Dave Mchenry
Email correspondence to and from this sender is subject to the N.C.Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.
4