820597_Routine_20211201

Facility Number
gt7
Division of Water Resources
0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation
0 Other Agency
Type of Visit:
Reason for Visit:
Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0, Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit:
19-11(
Arrival Time:
Departure Time:
Farm Name: fl 1 e j u r e e s
°wIl..Nem• f7agle core
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: RI g I e. (DIV
Owner Email:
Phone:
County: 4JTh' Region: f JV
Onsite Representative: P t ( 1 e co 1-9
Certified Operator: Ch (11 \ 1. e( CI ta n
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Title:. OtN}"t'(
Latitude:
Phone:
Integrator: �)tkl S�
Certification Number:
Certification Number:
Longitude:
I On-1-Or
Swine
Design Current
Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
0
CPO()
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Boars
Other
Wet Poultry
Design
Capacity
Current
Pop.
Layer
Non -Layer
Dry Poultry
Design Current
Capacity Pop.
Layers
Non -Layers
Pullets
Turkeys
Turkey Poults
Other
Cattle
Design Current
Capacity Pop.
Dairy Cow
Dairy Calf
Dairy Heifer
Dry Cow
Non -Dairy
Beef Stocker
Beef Feeder
Beef Brood Cow
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
of the State other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes SLNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
NA ❑NE
NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ No MIA ❑ NE
❑ No Ngt NA ❑ NE
'❑,, No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 1 of 3
5/12/2020 Continued

Facility Number: c.T
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes 'RNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes .0No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:�1 yIt,
Designed Freeboard (in): r
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? D Yes [No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes❑vNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
❑ Yes IQ No ❑ NA n NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require `� Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
r.maintenance or improvement? ., 1, -7( / i \ fit ,1 ( �� 1_ (I f y j
r I�
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes "LNo 0 NA ❑ NE
n Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload n Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. n Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
•
r,
12. Crop Type(s): �k °
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ YesNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes El No ❑ NA 0 NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists n Design ❑ Maps n Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? if yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes El No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application El Weekly Freeboard El Waste Analysis n Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking n Crop Yield 11120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections n Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge'? ❑ Yes 0 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? n Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 5/12/2020 Continued

Facility Number: La
- 9i
Date of Inspection: la I 'L
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification?
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommenda
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations (use additional pages as necessary).
SqODN I OoK good 3 So tec the c;PtayfilP,11 NX to t'Q
hMe,.
walth for th¢ do9 i2D), On Mvc-e oNQ, look 1i\ce it ov-afi0wed
bur dfd not affeaY ftQV€, the SIYe.
i1ODfl a IoOK good co do flods.
for IIifl Zie out O doer on house �.
-reiaiciS wilt be re'vrewed c1u2 To tech Spec having
mem(cii iSSveS. (A►As Qbie +0 review t,oQSi-ee nhqlySlS in
PFrLS.
Reviewer/Inspector Name: Katre fa r)t,flD f Phone: 9 19 ' 6I] i 9
,
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: �;19 t Date: I at
Page 3 of 3
2/4/2015

fi /
1
04,
FACILITY#:i
riFARM NAME: ! i
PERMIT (#19)
LAGOON LEVEL
DUE EVERY 5 YEARS
EXPERIATION DATE NUMBER OF ANIMALS
- CURRENT NUMBER OF ANIMAL
OIC CARD YES OR NO
WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN (WUP) (#20)
SOIL TYPES i!
CROP TYPES C
ODOR CONTROL CHECK LIST YES OR NO
Irrigation Plan Maps YES OR NO
WASTE REPORT (#21)
-GOOD FOR 60 DAYS BEFORE OR AFTER
DATE 1 1 67 ' :/- l NITROGEN LEVEL f ' 1
NITROGEN LEVEL (9' II/l
om..,
DATE 1-', tt� '
DATE f ! ' �; --
EVERY 3 YEARS:
NITROGEN LEVEL
SOIL REPORT (#21)
DATE
- P-I (NO MORE THEN 400)
- PH (Note if 4 or less)
Cu/ZN (NO MORE THEN 3000) CU ZN
(IF PEANUTS NO MORE THEN 300)
IRR2 (#2,)
Not over PAN CROP TYPES
FLOW RATES NITROGEN (N)
Not over PAN CROP TYPES
FLOW RATES NITROGEN (N)
Not over PAN CROP TYPES
FLOW RATES NITROGEN (N)
Not over PAN CROP TYPES
FLOW RATES NITROGEN (N)

CALBRIATION (#24)
EACH REEL SHOULD BE CALIBRATED EVERY OTHER YEAR
DATE OF CALIBRATION
FLOW RATES
RAIN FALL (#21)
-INITIAL AFTER 1" RAIN EVENT
-LOOK FOR ANY LEVEL THAT IS LESS THEN THE DESIGNED FREEBORED POA NEEDED.
SLUDGE (#21 &25)
-DUE EVERY YEAR: DATE
0: P: % RATIO OF SLUDGE
0: P: % RATIO OF SLUDGE
0: P: % RATIO OF SLUDGE
0: P: % RATIO OF SLUDGE
OTHER FORMS (#22 AND #21)
RAIN BREAKER FORM CROP YEILDS MORTALITY
*If fields are grazed there will be no crop yields
VISUAL CHECK
FOUNDATION OR PIT LEAKS PIPE LEAKS LAGOON SEEPAGE LAGOON BARE
AREAS TREES OR GRASS NEED TO BE REMOVED EROSION DITCHES
WINTER CROP(OVERSEEDED) HARVESTED FIELDS GOOD HEALTHY CORPS CORRECT
CROPS NO PONDING REELS FEED BINS LAGOON GARBAGE
Bermuda grass: Opens March 1st - Ends September 30th
Small Grain Over seed: Opens October 1st - Ends March 31st
Corn: Opens February 15th - Ends June 30th
Cotton: Opens March 15th - Ends August 1st
Rye: Opens September 1st - Ends March 31st
Oats: Opens September 1st - Ends April 15th
Wheat: Opens September 1st - Ends April 30th
Soybeans: Opens April 1st - Ends September 15th
Fescue: Opens August 1st - Ends July 31st
Sorghum Hay: Opens March 15th - Ends August 31 st

C
O 0
C
C E
• O
U
D
- C
o �
LL
(f) u,
o L
Qi—
t0 o
o 00
EL)
_ o
(n C
Y O
(Q
E 0
} O
E Z
o a)
T
• E
O t. L
CD 4—
E c
o co
0
03 0)
C
03
E
0)
C
o 2
E
0
CT
0
0
W
O
0)
C
E
E
0)
O
L
NW
6
0
0
O
0
0
0
O
0
0
0
boo
EITh
bNA
jV
1
40
•
0
L
0
0
0
0
O
ti
0
0
0
0

NCDA&CS Agronomic Division Phone: [phone] Website: www.ncagr.gov/agronomi/ Report No. FY22-W000436
Paul Stanley Sampled: 07/16/2021 I Received: 07/29/2021 I Completed: 08/02/2021 Page 2 of 3
Nutrient Measurements are given in units of parts per million (ppm), unless otherwise specified. Other Results
Nitrogen (N) P K Ca Mg S Fe Mn Zn Cu B Mo C Al Na CI
Total N: 35.7 546 70.5 32.5 17.4 1.65 0.28 0.69 0.17 0.89 - - 0.34 129 -
Total Kjeldahl N: 279
Inorganic:
NHa N SS EC pH BD CCE ALE C:N DM
NO3-N (105 S/cm) (mS/cm) (Unitless) (Ib/yd3) (%) (1000 gal) (Unitless) (%)
7.44 - - - - -
Estimate of Nutrients Available for First Year (Ib/1000 gal) Other Results (Ib/1000 gal)
Application Method: N P205 K20 Ca Mg S Fe Mn Zn Cu B Mo Al Na CI
Irrigation 1.16 0.68 5.46 0.59 0.27 0.15 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.01 - 0.00 1.08 -
Sample Information
ID: PSN-B
Code: ALS
Description: Swine
Lagoon Liq.
Grower Comments:
Swine lagoon

NCDA&CS Agronomic Division Phone: [phone] Website: www.ncagr.gov/agronomi/ Report No. FY22-W000436
Paul Stanley Sampled: 07/16/2021 I Received: 07/29/2021 I Completed: 08/02/2021 Page 3 of 3
Understanding the Waste Report
NH4-N = Ammonium -N
Ni = Nickel
NO3-N = Nitrate -N
P = Phosphorus
Pb = Lead
S = Sulfur
Se = Selenium
meq/L = milliequivalent per liter; mS = millisiemens; ppm = parts per million or mg/L; S = siemens; T = trace (<0.005 lb/unit)
Additional information: www.ncagr.gov/agronomi/pdffiles/uwaste.pdf & www.ncagr.gov/agronomi/pdffiles/wastequide.pdf
Cu = Copper
Fe = Iron
K = Potassium
Mg = Magnesium
Mn = Manganese
Mo = Molybdenum
N = Nitrogen
Na = Sodium
E
C U
E
E _E
D a
Nutrient concentrations and other data on this report are provided so that waste materials can be applied at agronomic rat
application and preventing environmental contamination. In reading the Laboratory Results section, remember that mate
analyzed as received; all other wastes are dried first. Values in the Estimate of Nutrients Available for First Crop sectio
application you specify and reflects the fact that only 40-60% of the nitrogen becomes available within one year of applica
available.
E
O
O
E
5-0 O 2
D
O
70 co L
ii
ii
it
ii
ii ii ii
— t/)
Ri
13 - L
Q<
CO
U
U U U
DM% is percent Dry Matter [for semi -solid and
solid waste, this value facilitates conversion of
dry -basis concentrations (ppm) back to
wet -basis of original sample].
EC (Electrical Conductivity) measures
salinity, or soluble salts (SS).
pH measures basicity/acidity.
ALE is Agricultural Lime Equivalence. The ALE
indicates the amount of the waste material that
provides a limiting effect equivalent to one ton of
agricultural grade limestone.
BD is Bulk Density in Ib/yd3.
CCE is Calcium Carbonate Equivalence and is
used to determine ALE.
C:N ratio is the Carbon:Nitrogen ratio.

c
O 0
D
c
c E
0
0 U
• -o
- c
0
LL
cn
o
a F-
t o
0
a. 0
2 L
cn
L ~
O -
Y O
E cB
U
L • �
E Z
a) N
`1) E
c
E c
O ca
0 L-
as 0)
c
co
ELs--ee�
1 0)
c
O OL
E
0
cT
0
0
^0
W
L
lH
O
0)
c
E
E
0)
O
L
^Q
NW
North Carolina
0
0
0'
0
0
0
O
0
0
h
0
O
0
L
0
0
by
0
0
0
O
L
O
0
O
j0j��
u4/
0
0
O
L
0
0
0,0
0
O
•
N
st Fund Commission

NCDA&CS Agronomic Division Phone: [phone] Website: www.ncagr.gov/agronomi/ Report No. FY21-W005351
Paul Stanley Sampled: 03/18/2021 I Received: 03/29/2021 I Completed: 04/01/2021 Page 2 of 3
Nutrient Measurements are given in units of parts per million (ppm), unless otherwise specified. Other Results
Nitrogen (N) P K Ca Mg S Fe Mn Zn Cu B Mo C Al Na CI
Total N: 27.4 536 86.1 24.2 13.5 3.56 0.35 2.28 0.69 0.81 - - 0.48 126 -
Total Kjeldahl N: 452
Inorganic:
NH4-N SS EC pH BD CCE ALE C:N DM
NO3-N (105 S/cm) (mS/cm) (Unitless) (Ib/yd3) (%) (1000 gal) (Unitless) (%)
7.60 - - - - -
Estimate of Nutrients Available for First Year (lb/1000 gal) Other Results (lb/1000 gal)
Application Method: N P205 K20 Ca Mg S Fe Mn Zn Cu B Mo Al Na CI
Irrigation 1.89 0.52 5.37 0.72 0.20 0.11 0.03 0.00 0.02 0.01 0.01 - 0.00 1.05 -
Sample Information
ID: PSN-B
Code: ALS
Description: Swine
Lagoon Liq.
Grower Comments:
SWINE

NCDA&CS Agronomic Division Phone: [phone] Website: www.ncagr.gov/agronomi/ Report No. FY21-W005351
Paul Stanley Sampled: 03/18/2021 I Received: 03/29/2021 I Completed: 04/01/2021 Page 3 of 3
Understanding the Waste Report
NH4-N = Ammonium -N
Ni = Nickel
NO3-N = Nitrate -N
P = Phosphorus
Pb = Lead
S = Sulfur
Se = Selenium
meq/L = milliequivalent per liter; mS = millisiemens; ppm = parts per million or mg/L; S = siemens; T = trace (<0.005 lb/unit)
Additional information: www.ncagr.gov/agronomi/pdffiles/uwaste.pdf & www ncagr.gov/agronomi/pdffiles/wasteguide.pdf
Cu = Copper
Fe = Iron
K = Potassium
Mg = Magnesium
Mn = Manganese
Mo = Molybdenum
N = Nitrogen
Na = Sodium
E E E
U E N
E O O 5-0 0 2
D 112 O CO C6 L L
<< m O O O O
ii n ii ii ii n n
Nutrient concentrations and other data on this report are provided so that waste materials can be applied at agroi
application and preventing environmental contamination. In reading the Laboratory Results section, remember 1
analyzed as received; all other wastes are dried first. Values in the Estimate of Nutrients Available for First Crc
application you specify and reflects the fact that only 40-60% of the nitrogen becomes available within one year c
available.
Q<
CO U U
U U
DM% is percent Dry Matter [for semi -solid and
solid waste, this value facilitates conversion of
dry -basis concentrations (ppm) back to
wet -basis of original sample].
EC (Electrical Conductivity) measures
salinity, or soluble salts (SS).
pH measures basicity/acidity.
ALE is Agricultural Lime Equivalence. The ALE
indicates the amount of the waste material that
provides a limiting effect equivalent to one ton of
agricultural grade limestone.
BD is Bulk Density in Ib/yd3.
CCE is Calcium Carbonate Equivalence and is
used to determine ALE.
C:N ratio is the Carbon:Nitrogen ratio.