310274_INSPECTIONS_20171231

NUMH CAHOLINA
Department of Environmental Qual

Nutrient Management Plan For Animal Waste Utilization
08-21-2015
This plan has been prepared for:
Cypress Creek Farm31--274
Herschel WJenkins
692 James Rd
Wallace, NC 28466
910--285-2403
This plan has been developed by:
Billy W Houston
Duplin Soil & Water Conservation
165 Agriculture Dr.
Suite B
Kenansville, NC 28349
910-296-2I20
Developer Signature
Type of Plan: Nitrogen Only with Manure Only
Owner/Manager/Producer Agreement
I (we) understand and agree to the specifications and the operation and maintenance
procedures established in this nutrient management plan which includes an animal
waste utilization plan for the farm named above. I have read and understand the
Required Specifications concerning animal waste management that are included with
this plan.
ti
� r
Signature (owner) Date
Signature (manager or producer) Date
This plan meets the minimum standards and specifications of the U.S. Department of
Agriculture - Natural Resources Conservation Service or the standard of practices
adopted by the Soil and Water Conservation Commission.
Plan Approved By:
-s—
TechnicH Specialist Signature Date
-------------------•---------------------------------------------------------------------•--------------------------------------------• •--------------------
173385 Database Version 4.1 Date Printed: 08-21-2015 Cover Page I

Nutrients applied in accordance with this plan will be supplied from the
following source(s):
Commercial Fertilizer is not included in this plan.
S7
Swine Feeder -Finish Lagoon Liquid waste generated 2,447,280 gals/year by a 2,640
animal Swine Finishing Lagoon Liquid operation. This production facility has waste
storage capacities of approximately 180 days.
Estimated Pounds of Plant Available Nitrogen Generated per Year
Broadcast
4411
Incorporated
5294
Injected
S294
Irrigated
4411
Max. Avail.
PAN (lbs) 'r
Actual PAN
Applied (lbs)
PAN Surplus/
Deficit (lbs)
Actual Volume
Applied (Gallons)
Volume Surplus/
Deficit (Gallons)
Year 1 1
4,411
7660
-3,249
3,424,349
-977,069
-------------
--------- ----- ---------------- ------ --••---.... •.... •. --- -- --- - ---- ---------
Note: 1n source 1D, S means standard sourer, U means user defined source.
Max. Available PAN is calculated on the basis of the actual application method(s) identified in the plan for this source.
173385 Database Version 4.1 Date Printed: 08-21-2015 Source Page I of 1

Narrative
Revise WUP Pulls 10-13 from Fescue to Bennuda Pasture.
------------- ------- -------------------------- -............ --------------•--------------------•---- --•----------------------------------
173385 Database Version 4.1 Date Printed: 08-21-2015 Narrative Page L of .1

The table shown below provides a summary ofthe crops or rotations included in this plan for each field. Realistic
Yield estimates are also provided for each crop in the plan. In addition, the Leaching Index for each field is shown,
where available.
Planned Crops Summary
Tract
Field
Total
Acres
Useable
Acres
Leaching
Index (LI)
Soil Series
Crop Sequence
RYE
4859
10
1.94
1.84
NIA
Norfolk'
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
Hybrid Bermudagrass Pasture
6.5 Tons
4859
11
1.94
1.94
NIA
Norfolk
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
Hybrid Bermudagrass Pasture
6.5 "Eons
4859
12
2.65
2.65
NIA
Norfolk
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
Hybrid Bermudagrass Pasture
4859
13
1.55
1.55
NIA
Norfolk
Small Grain Overseed
fl5f
Hybrid Bermudagrass Pasture
7455
1
1.42
1.42
NIA
Ant ille
Small Grain Oversccd
1.0 Tons
Hybrid Bermudagmss Hay
5.5 Tons
7455
2
1.26
1.26
NIA
Aut ill,
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tans
Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay
5.5 Tans
7455
3
1.29
1.29
NIA
Autryville
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay
5.5 Tons
7455
4
1_65
1-65
NIA
Norfolk
Small Grain Ovcrseed
1.0 Tons
Hytxid Bermudagrass Hay
6.5 Tons
7455
5
3.34
3.34
NIA
Coreston
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
Hybrid Hermudagrass Pasture
6.0 Tons
7455
6
3.27
3.27
NIA
Porestan
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
Hybrid Bcrmudagrass Pasture
6.0 Tons
7455
7
2.43
2.43
NIA
Norfolk
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
Hybrid Bermudagrass Pasture
6.5 Tons
7455
8
1-691
1.69
NIA
iNorfolk
Small Grain Overseed
I.0 Tons
5
Hybrid Beramrdagass Pasture
6.5 Tons
7455
9
1.28
1.28
NIA
Norfolk
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
Hybrid Bermudagrass Pasture
6.5 Tons
PLAN TOTALS: 25.61 25.6t
173385 Database Version 4.1 Date Printed 8/21I2015
PCs Page 1 of 2
NOTE: Symbol 0 means user entered data.

U
Potential Leaching
Techyrical Guidance
Low potential to contribute to soluble
None
c 2
nutrient leaching below the root zone.
>= 2 &
Moderate potential to contribute to
Nutrient Management (590) should be planned.
<= to
soluble nutrient leaching below the root
zone.
High potential to contribute to soluble
Nutrient Management (590) should be planned. Other conservation practices that improve
nutrient leaching below the root zone,
the. soils available water holding capacity and improve nutrient use efficiency should be
> to
considered. Examples are Cover Crops (340) to scavenge nutrients, Sod -Based Rotations
(328), Long-Temi WTIII (778), and edge -of -field pmetices such as Filter Strips (393) and
Riparian Forest Buffers (391).
173385 Database Version U Bate Printed 8/21/2015
PCS Page 2 of 2
NOTE. Symbol * means user entered data.

The Waste Utilization table shown below summarizes the waste utilization plan for this operation. This plan provides an estimate of the number of acres of
cropland needed to use the nutrients being produced. The plan requires consideration of the realistic yields of the crops to be grown, their nutrient requirements,
and proper timing of applications to maximize nutrient uptake.
This table provides an estimate of the amount of nitrogen required by the crop being grown and an estimate of the nitrogen amount being supplied by manure or
other by-products, commercial fertilizer and residual from previous crops. An estimate of the quantity of solid and liquid waste that will be applied on each field in
order to supply the indicated quantity of nitrogen from each source is also included. A balance of the total manure produced and the total manure applied is
included in the table to ensure that the plan adequately provides for the utilization of the manure generated by the operation.
Waste Utilization Table
Year 1
Tract
Field
Source
ID
Soil Series
Teti
Acres
Uac.
Acres
Crop
RYE
APpua
Period
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
Re4d
0WA)
Cum
Fert.
Nutrient
Applied
0bs/A)
Rea.
pbs/A)
AppfiQ
Metbod
Manure:
PA
Nutrient
Applied
(ibs/A)
Liquid
ManurrA
ppE 01
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(sere)
Liquid
rVfanum
Applied
(Field)
Solid
Manua
Applied
(Fkid)
N
N
N
N
1000
gaVA
Tons
1000 gals
tons
4859
10
S7
Norfolk
1.84
1.84
Small Grain Overseed
I.0 Tons
1011-3131
50
0
0
brig.
50
27.74
0.00
51.04
0.00
4859
10
S7
Norfolk
1.94
1.84
Hybrid Bermudagrass Pasture
6.5 Tons
311-9/30
*244
0
0
Irrig.
244
135.37
0.00
249.07
0.00
4859
11
S7
Norfolk
1.94
1.94
Small Grain Overscxd
1.0 Tons
10/1 3/31
5o
0
0
brig.
501
27.74
0.001
53,31
0.00
4859
11
S7
Norfolk
1.941
1.94
Hybrid Bermudagr= Pasture
6.5 Tons
3/I-9/30
*244
0
0
brig.
244
135.37
0.00
262,61
0.00
4859
12
S7
Norfolk
2.65
2.65
Small Grain Oversocd
1.0 Tons
10/13131
50
0
0
brig.
50
27.74
0.00
73.51
0.00
4859
12
S7
Norfolk
2.65
2.65
Hybrid Bermudagrass Pasture
6.5 Tons
311-9/30
*244
0
0
Irrig.
244
135.37
0.00
353.72
0.00
4859
l3
S7
Norfolk
1.55
1.55
Small Grain Ovecsoed
1.0 Tone
1011-3131
50
0
0
Irri-,
50
27.74
0.00
43,00
0.00
4859
13
$7
Norfolk
1.55
1.55
Hybrid Bermudagrass Pasture
6.5 Tons
311-9130
*244
0
0
brig.
244
135.37
0.00
209.82
0.00
7455
1
S7
Autryville
1.42
1.421
Small Gram Oversoed
1.0 Tons
10/1-3/31
50
0
0
Irrig.
50
19.97
0.00
28.36
0,00
7455
1
S7
AutryvilEe
1.42
1.42
Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay
5.5 Tons
3/1-9/30
*275
0
0
Irrig.
275
109.85
0.00
155.98
0,00
7455
2
S7
Autryvillc
1.26
I.26
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
10/1-3131
50
0
0
GTi&
50
19.97
0.00
25.17
0.00
7455
2
S7
Autryville
126
1.26
Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay
5.5 Tons
311-9/30
$275
0
0
Errig.
275
109,85
0.00
138,41
0.00
7455
3
S7
lAutryville
1.29
1.29
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
10/1-3/31
5o
0
0
Irrig.
50
19.97
0.00
25.76
0.00
7455
3
S7
Autryville
1.29
1.29
Hybrid Bermudagmss Hay
5.5 Tons
3/1-9130
+275
0
0
brig,
275
109.85
0.00
141.70
0,00
7455
4
S7
Norfolk
1.65
1.65
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
10/1.3/31
50
0
0
Irrig,
50
19.97
0.00
32.95
0.00
7455
4
S7
Norfolk
1.65
1.65
Hybrid B=udagrass Hay
6.5 Tons
3/1-9/30
*325
0
0
Irrig.
325
129.82
0.00
21420
0.00
173385 Database Version 4.1 Date Printed: 8/21/2015 WUT Page 1 of 2

Waste Utilization Table
Year 1
Tract
Fidd
Source
ID
Soil Swim
Total
Aces
Use.
Acres
Crop
RYE
APPlic,
Period
irogon
PA
Nutrient
Req'd
(lbs/A)
Cantu
'Fen.
Nutrient
Applied
pbs/A)
Rs.
(lbs/A)
Applia
Method
Mmnro
PA
Nutrient
Applied
Qbs/A)
Liquid
anurrA
ppbed
(a=)
Solid
Mane
Applied
(aao)
Ligtid
Manum
Applied
(Field)
Solid
Manurc
Applied
(Fell)
N
N
N
N
1000
pVA
Tons
1000 gals
tons
7455
5
S7
Forston
3.34
334
Small Grain Ovcseed
I.0 Tons
10/1-3/31
50
0
0
irrig
50
19.97
0.00
66.71
0.00
7455
5
S7
Forcunn
3.34
3.34
Hybrid BcrmudaV= Pas tue
6.0 Tons
3/1-9/30
1225
0
0
lrri8.
225
89.87
0.00
300.18
0.00
7455
6
S7
ormton
327
327
Small Grain Ovcrmd
1.0 Tons
10/1-3131
5o
0
0
brig.
50
19.97
0.00
65.31
0.00
7455
6
S7
Foresmn
3.27
3.27
Hybrid Bermudagrass Pasture
6.0 Tons
3/1-9/60
*225
0
0
Irrig.
225
89.87
0.00
293.89
0.00
7455
7
S7
orfolk
2.43
2.43
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
1011-3131
50
0
0
brig
$0
19.97
0.00
48.53
0.00
7455
7
S7
Norfolk
2.43
2.43
Hybrid Beanudegrass Pasture
6.5 Tons
3/1-9/30
*244
0
0
97.46
0.00
236.84
0.00
7455
8
S7
ortblk
1.69
1.69
Small Gratin Ovesecd
1.0 Tons
10/1-3/31
50
0
0
19.97
0.00
33.75
0.00
7455
8
S7
Norfolk
1.69
1.69
Hybrid BemtudW= Pasture
6.5 Tons
3/1.9/30
4244
0
0
$,g244
97.46
0.00
164,71
0.00
7455
9
S7
orfolk
128
1.28
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
10/1-3/31
50
0
0
19.97
0.00
25.56
0.00
7455
9
S7
Norfolk
128
1.28
Hybrid Bermudagrass Pasture
6.5 Tons
3/1-9/30
*244
0
0
97.46
0.00
124.75
0.00
' Total Applied, 1000 gallons
3,424.35
Total Produced, 1000 gallons
2.44728
Balance, 1000 gallons
-977.07
Total Applied, tons
0.00
Total Produced, tons
0.00
B2dbuM't0oS1
0.00
Notes: 1. In the tract column, - symbol means leased, otherwise, owned. 2. Symbol * means user entered data
173385 Database Version 4.1 Date Printed: 8/212015 WUT Page 2 of 2

The Irrigation Application Factors for each field in this plan are shown in the following table. Infiltration rate varies
with soils. If applying waste nutrients through art irrigation system, you must applyat a rate that will not result in
runoff. This table provides the maximum application rate per hour that may be applied to each field selected to
receive wastewater. It also lists the maximum application.arnount that each field may receive in any one application
event.
Irrigation Application Factors
Tract
Field
'Soil Series
Application Rate
(inches/hour)
Application Amount
(inches)
4859
10
Norfolk
0,50
1.0
4859
11
Norfolk
0.50
1.0
4859
12
Norfolk
0.50
1.0
4859
13
Norfolk
0.50
1.0
7455
1
Autryville
0.60
1.0
7455
2
Autryville
0.60
1.0
7455
3
Autryville
0.60
1.0
7455
4
Norfolk
0.50
1.0
7455
5
Foreston
0.50
1.0
7455
G
Foreston
0.50
1.0
7455
7
Norfolk
0.50
1.0
7455
8
orfolk
0.50
1.0
7455
9 jNorfb1k
'
0.50
1 1.0
173385 Database Version 4A Date Printed W 1/2015 IAF Page 1 of 1
NOTE: Symbol • means user entered data.

The following Lagoon Sludge Nitrogen Utilization table provides an estimate of the number of acres needed for
sludge utilization for the indicated accumulation period. These estimates are based on average nitrogen
concentrations for each source, the number of animals in the facility and the plant available nitrogen application
rates shown in the second column.
Lagoon sludge contains nutrients and organic matter remaining after treatment and application of the effluent. At
clean out, this material must be utilized for crop production and applied at agronomic rates. In most cases, the
priority nutrient is nitrogen but other nutrients including phosphorous, copper and zinc can also be limiting. Since
nutrient levels are generally very high, application of sludge must be carefully applied.
Sites must first be evaluated for their suitability for sludge application. Ideally, effluent spray fields should not be
used for sludge application. if this is not possible, care should be taken not to load effluent application fields with
high amounts of copper and zinc so that additional effluent cannot be applied. On sites vulnerable to surface water
moving to streams and lakes, phosphorous is a concern. Soils containing very high phosphorous levels may also
be a conceal.
Lagoon Sludge Nitrogen Utilization Table
Crop
Maximum
PA-N Rate
lb/ac
Maximum Sludge
Application Bate
1000 gal/ac
Minimum Acres
5 Years Accumulation
Minimum Acres
10 Years Accumulation
Minimum Acres
15 Years Accumulation
Swine Feeder -Finish Lagoon Sludge - Standard
Com 120 bu
156
14.69
29.66
59.31
88.97
Hay 6 ton R.Y.E.
300
29.38
14.83
29.66
44AR
Soybean 40 bu
1601
15.67
27-80
55.60
$3.41
...... ---------------------------------------------- ---- ............................ -............ ---•----------------------------------•--------------------------- ---- ---
173385 Database Version 4.1 Date Printed: 08-21-2015 Sludge Page I of 1

The Available Waste Storage Capacity table provides an estimate of the number of days of storage
capacity available at the end of each month of the plan. Available storage capacity is calculated as the
designs storage capacity in days ininus the number of days of net storage volume accumulated. The start
date is a value entered by (lie user and is defined as the date prior to applying nutrients to the first crop in
the plan at which storage volume in the lagoon or holding pond is equal to zero.
Available storage capacity should be greater than or equal to zero and less than or equal to the design
storage capacity of the facility. If the available storage capacity is greater than the design storage
capacity, this indicates that the plan calls for the application of nutrients that have not yet accumulated.
If available storage capacity is negative, the estimated volume of accumulated waste exceeds the design
storage volume of the structure. Either of these situations indicates that the planned application interval
in the waste utilization plan is inconsistent with the structure's temporary storage capacity,
Avnilahle Waste Storaore C'anacity
Source Name
I Swine Feeder -Finish Lagoon Liquid
Design Storage Capacity a s
Start Date
9/t
180
Plan Year
Month
Available Storage Capacity (Days)'
l
l
97
l
2
78
1
3
108
l
4
147
l
5
180
l
6
180
1
7
180
I
8
180
1
9
ISO
to
158 '
l
11
154
1
12
149
° Available Storage Capacity is calculated as of the end of each month.
--------- --------------------------- I ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ --- ------
173385 Database Version 4.1 Date Printed: 08-21-2015 Capacity Page I of 1

Required Specifications For Animal Waste Manazement
1. Animal waste shall not reach surface waters of the state by runoff, drift,
manmade conveyances, direct application, or direct discharge during
operation or land application. Any discharge of waste that reaches surface
water is prohibited.
2. There must be documentation in the design folder that the producer
either owns or has an agreement for use of adequate land on which to
properly apply the waste. If the producer does not own adequate land to
properly dispose of the waste, he/she shall provide evidence of an
agreement with a landowner, who is within a reasonable proximity,
allowing him/her the use of the land for waste application. It is the
responsibility of the owner of the waste production facility to secure an
update of the Nutrient Management Plan when there is a change in the
operation, increase in the number of animals, method of application,
receiving crop type, or available land.
3. Animal waste shall be applied to meet, but not exceed, the nitrogen needs
for realistic crop yields based upon soil type, available moisture, historical
data, climatic conditions, and level of management,'unless there are
regulations that restrict the rate of applications for other nutrients.
4. Animal waste shall be applied to land eroding less than 5 tons per acre
per year. Waste may be applied to land eroding at more than 5 tons per
acre per year but less than 10 tons per acre per year provided grass filter
strips are installed where runoff leaves the field (see USDA, NRCS Field
Office Technical Guide Standard 393 - Filter Strips).
5. Odors can be reduced by injecting the waste or by disking after waste
application. Waste should not be applied when there is danger of drift
from the land application field.
6. When animal waste is to be applied on acres subject to flooding, waste
will be soil incorporated on conventionally tilled cropland. When waste is
applied to conservation tilled crops or grassland, the waste may be
broadcast provided the application does not occur during a season prone
to flooding (see "Weather and Climate in North Carolina" for guidance).
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
173385- Database Version 4.1 Date Printed: 8/21/2015 Specification Page 1

7. Liquid waste shall be applied at rates not to exceed the soil infiltration
rate such that runoff does not occur offsite or to surface waters and in a
method which does not cause drift from the site during application. No
ponding should occur in order to control odor and flies.
8. Animal waste shall not be applied to saturated soils, during rainfall
events, or when the soil surface is frozen.
9. Animal waste shall be applied on actively growing crops in such a manner
that the crop is not covered with rvaste to a depth that would inhibit
growth. The potential for salt damage from animal waste should also be
considered.
10. Nutrients from waste shall not be applied in -fall or winter for spring
planted crops on soils with a high potential for leaching. Wastelnutrient
loading rates on these soils should be held to a minimum and a suitable
winter cover crop planted to take up released nutrients. Waste shall not,
be applied more than 30 days prior to planting of the crop or forages
breaking dormancy.
11. Any neltiv swine facility sited on or after October 1,1995-shall- comply with
the following: The outer perimeter of the land area onto which waste is
applied from a lagoon that is a component of a swine farm shall be at least
50 feet from any residential property boundary and canal. Animal waste,
other than swine waste from facilities sited on or after October 1,1995,
shall not be applied closer that 25 feet to perennial waters.
12. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 100 feet to wells.
13. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 200 feet of dwellings other
than those owned by the landowner.
14. Waste shall be applied in a manner not to reach other property and
public right-of-ways.
---------------------------------------------------------------.-..--------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------- ----------
173385 Database Version 4.1 Date Printed: 8/21/2015 Specification Page 2

15. Animal waste shall not be discharged into surface waters, drainageways,
or wetlands by a discharge or by over -spraying. Animal waste may be
applied to prior converted cropland provided the fields have been
approved as a land application site by a "technical specialist". Animal
waste shall not be applied on grassed waterways that discharge directly
into water courses, and on other grassed waterways, waste shall be
applied at agronomic rates in a manner that causes no runoff or drift
from the site.
16. Domestic and industrial waste from wash down facilities, showers, toilets,
sinks, etc., shall not be discharged into the animal waste management
system.
17. A protective cover of appropriate vegetation will be established on all
disturbed areas (lagoon embankments, berms, pipe runs, etc.). Areas
shall be fenced, as necessary, to protect the vegetation. Vegetation such as
trees, shrubs, and other woody species, etc., are limited to areas where
considered appropriate. Lagoon areas should be kept mowed and
accessible. Berms and structures should be inspected regularly for
evidence.of erosion, leakage, or discharge.
18. If animal production at the facility is to be suspended or terminated, the
owner is responsible for obtaining and implementing a "closure plan"
which will eliminate the possibility of an illegal discharge, pollution, and
erosion.
19. Waste handling structures, piping, pumps, reels, etc., should be inspected
on a regular basis to prevent breakdowns, leaks, and spills. A regular
maintenance checklist should be kept on site.
20. Animal waste can be used in a rotation that includes vegetables and other
crops for direct human consumption. However, if animal waste is used on
crops for direct human consumption, it should only be applied pre -plant
with no further applications of animal waste during the crop season.
21. Highly visible markers shall be installed to mark the top and bottom
elevations of the temporary storage (pumping volume) of all waste
treatment lagoons. Pumping shall be managed to maintain the liquid level
behveen the markers. A marker will be required to mark the maximum
storage volume for waste storage ponds.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------•--- ------------------ ----
173385 Database Version 4.1 Date Printed: 8/2 U2015 Specification Page 3

22. Waste shall be tested within 60 days of utilization and soil shall be tested
at least annually at crop sites where waste products are applied. Nitrogen
shall be the rate -determining nutrient, unless other restrictions require
waste to be applied based on other nutrients, resulting in a lower
application rate than a nitrogen based rate. Zinc and copper levels in the
soils shall be monitored and alternative crop sites shall be used when
these metals approach excessive levels. pH shall be adjusted and
maintained for optimum crop production. Soil and waste analysis
records shall be kept for a minimum of five years. Poultry dry waste
application records shall be maintained for a minimum of three years.
Waste application records for all other waste shall be maintained for five
(5) years.
23. Dead animals will be disposed of in a manner that meets North Carolina
regulations.
-------------------------------------- ------ ---------------------------------------------------------------------------.........-------------------------------
173385 Database Version 4.1 Date Printed: 8/21/2015 Specification Page 4

Crop Notes
The following crop note applies to field(s): 4
Bennudagrass Coastal Plain, Mineral Soil, Moderately Well Drained.
Adaptation: Well -adapted.
In the Coastal Plain, hybrid bermudagrass sprigs can be planted Mar. 1 to Mar. 31. Cover sprigs 1" to 3"
deep (1.5" optimal). Sprigs should be planted quickly after digging and not allowed to dry in sun and
wind. For Coastal and Tifton 78 plant at least 10 bu/ac in 3' rows, spaced 2' to 3' in the row. Generally a
rate of 30 bu/ac is satisfactory to produce full groundcover in one or two years under good growing
conditions. Tifton 44 spreads slowly, so use at least 40 bu/ac in 1.5' to 2' rows spaced t' to 1.5' in row.
For broadcast/disked-in sprigs use about 60 bu/ac. Soil test for the amounts of lime, phosphorus,
potassium and micronutrients to apply preplant and for annual maintenance. Apply 60 to 100 lb/ac N in
the establishment year in split applications in April and July. For established stands apply 180 to 240
lb/ac N annually in split applications, usually in April and following the first and second bay cuts.
Reduce N rates by 25% for grazing. Refer to NCSU Technical Bulletin 305 Production and Utilization
of Pastures and Forages in Noah Carolina for more information or consult your regional agronomist or
extension agent for assistance.
The following crop note applies to field(s): I, 2, 3
Bermudagrass Coastal Plain, Mineral Soil, Moderately Well Drained.
Adaptation: Well -adapted. .
In (lie Coastal Plain, hybrid bermudagrass sprigs can be planted Mar. 1 to Mar. 31. Cover sprigs 1" to 3"
deep (1.5" optimal). Sprigs should be planted quickly after digging and not allowed to dry in sun and
wind. For Coastal and Tifton 78 plant at least 10 bu/ac in 3' rows, spaced 2' to 3' in the row. Generally a
rate of 30 bu/ac is satisfactory to produce full groundcover in one or two years tinder good growing
conditions. Tifton 44 spreads slowly, so use at least 40 bu/ac in L5' to 2' rows spaced P to 1.5' in row.
For broadcast/disked-in sprigs use about 60 bu/ac. Soil test for the amounts of lime, phosphorus,
potassium and micronutrients to apply preplant and for annual maintenance. Apply 60 to 100 lb/ac N in
the establishment year in split applications in April and July. For established stands apply 180 to 240
lb/ac N annually in split applications, usually in April and following the first and second hay cuts.
Reduce N rates by 25% for grazing. Refer to NCSU Technical Bulletin 305 Production and Utilization
of Pastures and Forages in North Carolina for more information or consult your regional agronomist or
extension agent for assistance.
---------•---------------------------------------•----- •---........--------------------------------•-------------...---------------------------------•--••----
173385 Database Version 4.1 Date Printed: 08-21-2015 Crop Note Page 1 of 3

The following crop note applies to field(s): 5, G
Small Grain: CP, Mineral Soil, low -leachable
In the Coastal Plain, oats and barley should be planted from October 15-October 30; and rye from
October 15-November 20. For barley, plant 22 seed/drill row foot and increase the seeding rate by 5% for
each week seeding is delayed beyond the optimum time. See the seeding rates table for applicable
seeding rate modifications in the current NCSU "Small Grain Production Guide". Also, increase the
initial seeding rate by at least 10% when planting no -till. Oats should be planted at 2 bushelstacre and
rye at 1-1 1/2 bushels/acre. Plant all these small grains at 1-1 1/2" deep. Adequate depth control is
essential. Review the NCSU Official Variety "green book" and information from private companies to
select a high yielding variety with the characteristics needed for your area and conditions. Apply no more
than 30 lbs/acre N at planting. Phosphorus and potash recommended by a soil test can also be applied at
this time. The remaining N should be applied during the months of February -March.
'Fite following crop note applies to field(s): 10, 11, 12, 13, 4, 7, 8; 9
Small Grain: CP, Mineral Soil, medium leachable
In the Coastal Plain, oats and barley should be planted from October 15-October 30; and rye from
October 15 November 20. For barley, plant 22 seed/drill rote foot and increase the seeding rate by 5% for
each week seeding is delayed beyond the optimum time. See the seeding rates table for applicable
seeding rate modifications in the current NCSU "Small Grain Production Guide". Also, increase the
initial seeding rate by at least 10% when planting no -till. Oats should be -planted at 2 bushels/acre and
rye at 1-1 112 bushels/acre. Plant all these small grains at 1-1 1/2" deep. Adequate depth control is
essential. Review (lie NCSU Official Variety "green book" and information from private companies to
select a high yielding variety with the characteristics needed for your area and conditions, Apply no more
than 30 Ibs/acre N at planting. Phosphorus and potash recommended by a soil test can also be applied at
this time. The remaining N should be applied during the months of February -March. -
The following crop note applies to field(s): 1, 2, 3
Small Grain: CP, Mineral Soil, medium leachable
In the Coastal Plain, oats and barley should be planted from October 15-October 30; and rye from
October 15-November 20. For barley, plant 22 seed/drill row foot and increase the seeding rate by 5% for
each week seeding is delayed beyond the optimum tinie. See the seeding rates table for applicable
seeding rate modifications in the current NCSU "Small Grain Production Guide". Also, increase the
initial seeding rate by at least 10% when planting no -till. Oats should be planted at 2 bushels/acre and S
rye at 1-1 1/2 bushels/acre. Plant all these small grains at 1-1 1/2" deep. Adequate depth control is
essential. Review the NCSU Official Variety "green book" and information from private companies to
select a high yielding variety with the characteristics needed for your area and conditions. Apply no more
than 30 Ibslacre N at planting. Phosphorus and potash recommended by a soil test can also be applied at
this time. The remaining N should be applied during the months of February -March.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------• •---------------------------------------------------------
173385 Database Version 4.1 Date Printed: 08-21-2015 Crop Note Page 2 of 3

The following crop note applies to field(s): 5, 6
Bermudagrass CP, Mineral Soil, Poorly Drained to Somewhat Poorly Drained.
Adaptation: Effective artificial drainage MUST be in place to achieve Realistic Yield Expectations
provided for these soils.
fn the Coastal Plain, hybrid bermudagrass sprigs can he planted Mar. 1 to Mar. 31. Cover sprigs I" to 3"
deep (1.5" optimal). Sprigs should be planted quickly after digging and not allowed to dry in sun and
wind. For Coastal and Tifton 78 plant at least 10 bu/ac in 3' rows, spaced 2' to 3' in the row. Generally a
rate of 30 bu/ac is satisfactory to produce full groundcover in one or hvo years under good growing
conditions. Tifton 44 spreads slowly, so use at least 40 bu/ac in 1.5' to 2' rows spaced V to 1.5' in row.
For broadcast/disked-in sprigs use about 60 bu/ac. Soil test for the amounts of lime, phosphorus,
potassium and micronutrients to apply preplant and for annual maintenance. Apply 60 to 100 Ib/ac N in
the establishment year in split applications in April and July. For established stands apply 180 to 240
lb/ac N annually in split applications,,usually in April and following the first and second hay cuts.
Reduce N rates by 25% for grazing. Refer to NCSU Technical Bulletin 305 Production and Utilization
of Pastures and Forages in North Carolina for more information or consult your regional agronomist or
extension agent for assistance.
The following crop note applies to Feld(s): 10, 11, 12, 13, 7, 8, 9
Bermudagrass: CP, Mineral Soil, Moderately Well Drained.
Adaptation: Well -adapted.
hi the Coastal Plain, hybrid bermudagrass sprigs can be planted Mar. i to Mar. 31. Cover sprigs I" to 3"
deep (1.5" optimal). Sprigs should be planted quickly after digging and not allowed to dry in sun and
wind. For Coastal and Tifton 78 plant at least 10 bu/ac in 3' rows, spaced 2' to 3' in the row. Generally a
rate of 30 bu/ac is satisfactory to produce full groundcover in one or two years under good growing
conditions. Tifton 44 spreads slowly, so use at least 40 bu/ac in 1.5' to 2' rows spaced 1' to 1.5' in ro%v.
For broadcast/disked-in sprigs use about 60 bulac. Soil test for the amounts of lime, phosphorus,
potassium and micronutrients to apply preplant and for annual maintenance. Apply 60 to 100 lb/ac N in
the establishment year in split applications in April and July. For established stands apply 180 to 240
Ib/ac N annually in split applications, usually in April and following the first and second hay cuts.
Reduce N rates by 25% for grazing. Refer to NCSU Technical Bulletin 305 Production and Utilization
of Pastures and Forages in North Carolina for more information or consult your regional agronomist or
extension agent for assistance.
------------------------------------------------------------------ --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
173365 Database Version 4.1 Date Printed: 08-21-2015 Crop Note Page 3 of 3

55P
At G
NO
C
NO
,\fJA
Jodi
Cypress Creek
Fac 31-274
Not to Scale
.65Ac
.f*

NCDENR JUL 12 2012
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Beverly Eaves Perdue Charles Wakild, P.E. Dee F ere man
Governor Director Secretary
July 9, 2012
Nick Herring
Langston Nursery
1902 S NC Hwy 11
Rose Hill, NC 28458
Subject: Certificate of Coverage No. AWS310273
Langston Nursery
Swine Waste Collection, Treatment,
Storage and Application System
Duplin County
Dear Nick Herring:
In accordance with your July 5, 2012 Notification of Change of Ownership, we are hereby forwarding to
you this Certificate of Coverage (COC) issued to Nick Herring, authorizing the operation of the subject
animal waste management system in accordance with General Permit AWG100000.
This approval shall consist of the operation of this system including, but not limited to, the management
and land application of animal waste as specified in the facility's Certified Animal Waste Management
Plan (CAWMP) for the Langston Nursery, located in Duplin County, with a swine animal capacity of no
greater than the following annual averages:
Wean to Finish: Feeder to Finish: Boar/Stud:
Wean to Feeder: 2640 Farrow to Wean: Gilts:
Farrow to Finish: Farrow to Feeder: Other:
If this is a Farrow to Wean or Farrow to Feeder operation, there may be one boar for each 15 sows. Where
boars are unnecessary, they may be replaced by an equivalent number of sows. Any of the sows may be
replaced by gilts at a rate of 4 gilts for every 3 sows.
The COC shall be effective from the date of issuance until September 30, 2014, and shall hereby void
Certificate of Coverage Number AWS310273 dated October 1, 2009. Pursuant to this COC, you are
authorized and required to operate the system in conformity with the conditions and limitations as
specified in the General Permit, the facility's CAWMP, and this COC. An adequate system for collecting
and maintaining the required monitoring data and operational information must be established for this
facility. Any increase in waste production greater than the certified design capacity or increase in number
of animals authorized by this COC (as provided above) will require a modification to the CAWMP and
this COC and must be completed prior to actual increase in either wastewater flow or number of animals.
Please carefully read this COC and the enclosed State General Permit. Please Pay careful attention to the
record keeping and monitoring conditions in this permit. Record kegping forms are unchanged with this
General Permit. Please continue to use the same record keepingforms,
orms,
1636 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1636
Location: 512 N. Salisbury St. Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Phone: [phone] FAX: [phone]
Internet: www.nmater4uality.4ra
NorthCarolina
Natmally
An Equal opportunity 1 Affirmative Action Employer

f'
If your Waste Utilization Plan (WUP) has been developed based on site -specific information, careful
evaluation of future samples is necessary. Should your records show that the current WUP is inaccurate
you will need to have a new WUP developed.
The issuance of this COC does not excuse the Permittee from the obligation to comply with all applicable
laws, rules, standards, and ordinances (local, state, and federal), nor does issuance of a COC to operate
under this permit convey any property rights in either real or personal property.
Per 15A NCAC 2T .0105(h) a compliance boundary is provided for the facility and no new water supply
wells shall be constructed within the compliance boundary. Per NRCS standards a 100-foot separation
shall be maintained between water supply wells and any lagoon, storage pond, or any wetted area of a
spray field.
Please be advised that any violation of the terms and'conditions specified in this COC, the General Permit
or the CAWMP may result in the revocation of this COC, or penalties in accordance with NCGS 143-
215.6A through 143-215.6C including civil penalties, criminal penalties, and injunctive relief.
If you wish to continue the activity permitted under the General Permit after the expiration date of the
General Permit, then an application for renewal must be filed at least 180 days prior to expiration.
This COC is not automatically transferable. A name/ownership change application must be submitted to
the Division prior to a name change or change in ownership.
If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this COC are unacceptable, you have the right to
apply for an individual permit by contacting the Animal Feeding Operations Unit for information on this
process. Unless such a request is made within 30 days, this COC shall be final and binding.
In accordance with Condition U.22 of the General Permit, waste application shall cease within four (4)
hours of the time that the National Weather Service issues a Hurricane Warning, Tropical Storm Warning,
or a Flood Watch associated with a tropical system for the county in which the facility is located. You
may find detailed watch/warning information for your county by calling the Newport/Morehead City, NC
National Weather Service office at [phone], or by visiting their website at:
www.erh.noaa.gov/
This facility is located in a county covered by our Wilmington Regional Office. The Regional Office
Aquifer Protection Staff may be reached at [phone]. If you need additional information
concerning this COC or the General Permit, please contact the Animal Feeding Operations Unit staff at
[phone].
Sincerely,
Enclosure (General Permit AWG100000)
cc: (Certificate of Coverage only for all ccs)
[Wilmington:Regional Office,.Aqui. Protection ................. c,
Duplin County Health Department
Duplin County Soil and Water Conservation District
APS Central Files (Permit No. AWS310273)
AFO Notebooks
Murphy -Brown, LLC
for Charles Wakild, P.E.

...
Notification of Change of Ownership
Animal Waste Management Facility
(Please type or print all information that does not require a signature)
)VI Izo
�y
In accordance with time reguirernents of 15A NCAC 2H _0217(a)[1)(H)(xii) this form is official notification to the Divisscn of
Water Quality (DWQ) of the transfer. of ownership of an Animal Waste Management Facility. This form must be
submitted to DWQ no later than 60 days following the transfer of ownership.
General Information:
Name of Farm: Langston Nursery Facility No: t131-0273
Previous Owner(s) Name: Gary !Hann Phone No: s:o-za�zs
New Owner(s) Name: - - — Nick Herrir:g - - - -- Phone No: a,a 1-21! ZVN
Mailing Address: i 40 2 S U G
0-rf Etrrw NC. -21g51
Farm Loca6dn:
Warsaw NC
County:
Duplin
Please attach a copy of a county road map with location identified and described below (Be specific: road names,
directions, milepost, etc.): T
SR 1307, 142 Sammy
Godwin Lane
_
I
Operation Description:
Type of swine W. of Animals
Type ofPowity Na of Animals
Tyne of cattle !b. amirral8
© wean to Fender 2600
Q Layer
Q
Dairy
© Feeder to Finish
© Pullets
©
Beet
[
0 Farrow to wean
Q Farrow to Feeder
Q Farrow toFmish Omar Type ofLivestock Nurrrberof}tnhnals
Q Wi an to Finish
0 Gifts
Soars
Acreage Available for Application: 11 Required Acreage: 6 1
Number of Lagoons 1 Storage Ponds: 1 Total Capacity: 141,367 Cubic Feet (W)
Owner 1 Manager Agreement
1 (we) verify that all the above information is correct and win be upda:ed upon changing, I (we) understand the operation and maintenance
pmceduros established In the Cerhiied Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP) Tor the farm named above and unli implement these procedwies,
(we) ►new that any modification or enwnsion to the e4sting design capacity of the waste treatment and storage systems or construction of new
facilities vri0 raquiry a permit mo6fication before the new animals am stocked. 1 (we) understand that there must be no discharge of anhrral Waste
from the storage or appilcation system to surraee waters of the stas either directly through a man-made conveyance or from a storm event less
severe than the 25 - year, 24 - hour storm and there must not he run-off from the apprira5on of animal waste. I (we) understand that this taoility may
be covered by a State Hon -Discharge Permit or a. NPDPS Permit and completion of the form authorizes the Division of Water Quaffty to issue the
required permit to the new land owner,
Marne of Previous land Owner. GOT
Mann I
Signatun� %mJ 1 •.. ,� Date: l w ! 'r
Name of Now Land
Marne of Manager (If diffdrent from
s 9.
Date:
Signature,• Date:
Please sign and return this form to:
N.C. Civtalon of Water Quality
AqutferPrctecfion Section
Animal Feeding Operations Unit
1636 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27n91636
RECEIVEDIDENRIM
JUL 1 1 2012
Aquifer Protection Section

l'-QS? Y'IQouvoillo 17-=G7
a1-czr- t, i!:4y r=*i-
PRWUCSR;
Langston Nursery
LOCATrON:
P.O. Box 806
Rose i- IL NC 28458
TEXBOH4NE:
[phone]
'TYPE oFvpuiLTioN:
Wean - Feeder
NUMBER OF ANNUALS: 2640
i wgn C- arify)
The waste from your animal facility must be land appG?d at a specified rate ta prevent pollution
of su taw and/or aroundwater. The plant nutrients in the animal waste should be used to
reduce the amount of commercial fertilizer requfred for the crops in the fields where the waste is
to be applied. This waste udraz6on plan uses nitrogen as P:a limiting nutrient. Waste should be
armlyzed before each application qme. Annual soil tests are strongly encourrged so that all
plant nutrients can be bafanced for realistic yields of the crop to be grcWn.
Sever- factors are important in implementing your waste utiliza'Don plan in order to ma)dmize
the ;'eA2er value of the waste and to erasure that it is applied in an environmentalty safe
nmruier. Ahrrys apply waste based on the needs of the crop to be grown and the nutrient
cante-nt of the waste. Do not apply more nitrogen ttian the crap can utilize. Soil types are
important as they have dMerent infiltration rates, leaching potentials, cation, exchange
capaa'tes, and available water holding c2pacades. NomWly waste shall not be applied to land
wing at greater than S torts pet acre per year. With sped precautions, waste may be
applietl so land eroding at up to 10 tons per year. Do not apply vrrste on saturated soils, when it
Is raining, or when the surface is frozen. Either of these conditions may result in runoff to
surface waters which is not allowed under DEM regulations. Wind conditions should also be
considered to avoid drift and dowmMnd odor problems. To rttwa.'ntze the value of nutrients for
crop production and to reduce the potential for poluton, the waste should be applied to a
grovAig =p or applied to bare ground not more than 30 days pr'or to planting. Injecting the
waste or disking will conserve nrttrierrts and reduce odor problens_
the esfirttatad acres needed to apply tt}e anirnal waste is based on. typlcal nutrient content. for
this type of facility. Acreage reauirerients should be based on the waste anafysfs report from
yotr vsraste management facility. Attached you will find information on proper sampling
tachniques, preparation, and transfer of waste samples to the lab for analysis.
This waste utilt nUon plan, if tarriad out; meets the requireements for compliance with 15A NCAC
2H.0247 adopted by the Environmental Management Comrnlsston.
P2ge 1
RECEIVEDIDENRIDWQ
JUL 112012
Aquifer. Protection Section

EitiZR't-
1
T-634 FODU310010 E-247
AMgnt of Wash Zroduced Pe og7ftns. it tons, etc.)
ZSW animaisX 042 (bns)waste/animaVyesr= 1,109 (tons)wast'aIye2r.
Amount of PlantAvargebfe Nit ogee (PAN) Produced Per Year
2,640 anwzals X O,CB bs. PANFanhetiyear = 1,267 ft. PAN/year. (PAN from M.C. ism
Guide Std 633)
Applying Me above arnourd o; .waste is a big job. You should plan time and haw appropriaie
egVwnx enf to apply the waste in a tfrnely manner
The following acreage wff be needed for waste application based on the crop to be grown and
surface appilcaticr:_
cable I. ACRES OWNED BY PRODUCER
Tract Field soil Crop Lbs. N Acres Lbs_ N Month of
9 No_ Tvne PQr Acre LWIized AntCliratinn
3107W 1
NoA
Bermuda (GI
2601
2.501
650
ranch - Sevi
3107 E-2
NoA
I Bermuda (G)
2601
2,501
650
1 March - Sept
3107 W-3
NoA
JSrnaB Grain G)
50
3.00
150
t - " ni
31{il e-d
NoA
Small Grain (G)
Sol
3.00
150
Seat -Apra
"oP'rltyralu."
3107
W-3
INQA
Bermuda G)
260
3.00
780
March - Sept
3107
E-4 INOA
Bermuda G)
260
3.00
780
March -Sept___
3107
W-i TiGK
jSrreH
Gran G
50
2.50
125
Sept - rt7
3107
INOA
SmaBGraph G)
50
2ZO
125
Sept -ADS
I
Total
II.cof
1,600A0
"Phis N is fmm animal waste only. IT nutrfents from othersouraes such as commercial ferlilfzerare
applred, dory must be aeaotmfed for hr must be based on realisticyield apectadon_
NOM- The appftafar is Catrboned that P and K x ay he C'Jer applied awhile metL-Ung the N
requiramwim Beginning in 9896 the Coastal Zone Management Act wN require harmers in sore
easfew couriCres of Mond Caralime to have a nutrfenf management plan thaf addresses all nt*Ienrs.
This plan only addresses Aftogerr.
Page 2

•r--b34 R004/0010 F-147
Table 2_ ACRES WFM AGREEMENT OR LONG TERM LEASE
(Agmenmt with aejarort landowpor must be attached)
(Required only if opw*bardoes not own adequate land jses
Required 5poWication Zjj
Tract FWd Soil Crop Lbs. N Acres Lies. N fdor=th of,
' See emote for Table 1 _
Totals Prom above Taxes
Aams Lbs. N
Utilized
Table 1 11.00 1.600
Table 10,00 -
Totai 11.001 1,600
Amovnl of N Produced 1 11267
suplas or Deficit (333}
NO-rF- the LSWa-e VWj2a ion Pfau r7jtt contun pmvisfans fcr pWOdie Tend appfl-eotlon of xlcdge ar
apiDn=de rates. The sludge swirl be acre ienl rich and will regv+re prw=lldonary aeastirss to PMveni over
vpffcagon ofrurtrkntarcther ekimwcs
Pepe 3

cF34C'1-
7-534 FOOOSIE0I0 F-147
See attach d map showkg &,e fr2lds to be used far tha u&rizaflorr of waste. water.
Ap pEication of Waste by Irrigation
Field Soo Type Crop Appticst3on Application
i}i4S TASLE i5 rY[ii rtEpEp 1F W.L53 [3 t F BclrrC APPE1 BY itZR[GAT 23P[. }{pSr1=YEiZ A SSIuftL a Lr BISc VW.L
BE .4Ee)M FOR DRY LrrrER OR SLURRY.
Your faddy is designed for 180 days of temporary stprMe and Me temporary storage must
De removed m fie average of once every 6 %40,WHS. In no instarsce should the volumes of
waste being stored in y= sh.--urie ex=4 Sevaiion 'see la on desion.
Cali the i x*i Nahaaf Rasources Conservation Service (formerly ScZ Corrserv; orb Serene) or Soil
and Water ConservatiaPn District office after you receive the waste analysis report for assistance in
defe3mining trim amwnt per acre to apply and the proper application rate prior to applysig the
vrste.
Nanra&& of Op4erafibn' Acres shown. am wetted acres w farm n diagram
Page4

11 1'Z:bid L—hlx-
i'-ti:ia ?WW9W?U117 r-?a'1
a �r •.v�Tr.-' _ _ - c
REQUIRED SPECfEICAMNS
A*nat waste shalt not re2--h Surrace waters of the slate by runoff. drift, rrrammde
axiweyances, direct application, or dUed drsdorge during operation or land appfication.
Alit' discharge of wam whirl's reactles surfce water is prohibited.
2 There must be documentation in the design folder ttrvt me producer ecZhFx owns or has an
agreement for use of adequate. Land on which to propiHy apply the tivasie. ff tine producer
does not own adequate fermi to property dire of waste, harshe shaA proviae a copy of
an agreement with a tasidewner who is twitixn a reasonable proximity, allowing hfrrinar the
use of the tarsi for waste appricabon. It is tfie rasponsibWty of the ovmer of the facility to
sa='e 2n update of the Waste l.iblimfion Pfau when there is a grange in itie operation,
6'is�'easa lit the ntmiber of animals, me!t�d of e;Glizatson. ar ava8abte tzrs6.
3 ArmnBl waste shad be died to maet, but not a zeed. the nitrogen needs for realistic crop
yie5ds based on sort type, available rtioL Lm h'seriral data, QR rralk Conditions, and level
of mod, unless Time are rvgtsta6ons that restrict the rate of application for other
nummim
4 Ar&rW waste shWf be applied to land eroding less ttran 5 tons per acre per year_ waste
tray be zppfied to land that'ts eroding at 5 or more ions, but fens 5'r—'n 10 tons per acre per
Year pturidfnig grass filter strips are installed where runoff leaves the field, (Sue FOTG
Sfsndard 393 - i'"fi W SVfp).
5 Ddors can be reduced by Ong the wastes or disking aster urasm appiica'don_ waste
should not be applied when there is danger of drM fvm the irrigation iletd_
6 VVhen animal urdsm b to be 2ppiled on acres sut>j to f3ooding, it will. be so7 incorporated
on cones rriiorml y Sad cropland. When applied to conservation tilled crops or grassland,
the waste ntay be i3ruadcast provided the eppGcation does not occur during a season
ptimm to %odkV. {see weather and CraTmte Gi Noah tarog na' for yuidence-3
7 Ekprid waste shall be applied at rates not to exceed the.soil irT.Watlon rate such that runoff
does not ocatr ate or to surface waters and in a r. sthod which does not cause drift
:torn Me site during appl' n. No ponding should occur m order to cortrof odor ar flies.
8 Anima€ Waste shall not be applied to sm.-ated sops, dining rain.�?lf a ,ents, or when :ire
surft= is ftmmn.
Pages

FBfJ�-
>.s.�•,`:3
REQUIRED SPEGEFIGAilONS
(continued)
T-E34- FOO 7I'M120 F-197
9 Animal waste shall be applied on aefiveiy gnawing crops in such a rrrarner that the crop is
not covered wb waste to a depth that wsould inhibit.grcwth. The potential for salt d2=cce
from arwrraf waste should also be considered.
13 Was8: nutrients shall not be appriez to fact or wintar for spring planted crops on sons with a
high potential for leaching. SAlaste nutrent loading rates an these sails should be held to a
Mir- murn and a suftbis winter cover crop planted to take up reeasd nutrients. Wt!ite
SW not be applied more than 30 days prior to plan,". of the crop or forages breafdng
doM%Mry.
11 Any new swine I*Aty sited on or aft-r October 1, 1995 shaft comply with the foflowing.
The outer pereneter of the land area cacao which waste is applied from a lagoon that is a
comportprtt of a swine faun shall be at least 50 feet rom any residential property boundary
and fiurn any perenn al stream or n%.w (other t)zn an irrigation ditch or canal. Animal
waste other than swine trash; from facgitles s,'ted on or after C)uober 1, 1 QSJ, shall not be
applied closer than 25 feet to petenval waters. (see Standard M - Fal�:r Strips).
12 Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 100 Wt to vireos.
13 Anginal waste shall not be applied c1cser than 200 feet of dwedCrngs other than these
owned by ttte landrwrner.
la Waste shall be applied in a manner riot to reach other property and public right-oPmays.
13 Anil waste shag riot be disGtarged into surface waters, drainageways, or wetlands by
drs� or by over -spraying. Animal waste may be applied to prior converted wetlands
provided they have been approved as a fare application site by a "techntcat spec-ieftst".
Anima( waste shall not be applied on grassed va derways that discharge directly into water
oaurses. end cn other grassed vratmvays, waste st:alt be applied at agronomic rates in a
aenner that courses no runoff ordri t from the site.
is Dorrrastic and k0astrim waste from wrashdown facilities, showers, to9ets, sinks_ e`er, shall
not be d"scharged into the animal waste. managesrrent sysL-m.
Page 6

tt"ly-'1.0 t�::,F7 k'`A.N7- 1"II3� Yl;edZ;/Idrt� !-:.uf
r
'•i�'�`�:r��`�.�--y�;F�j7s.�l'i.��?ti.4-'��,.�}�?e' �u ."!•'s„ 'a'�'� i '�.
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
(conlimed)
17 A protu:6" =d, of appropriatm vegetation will be estabGshrd an all disturbed areas
(lagoon rnrbankrnwts, berms, pipe runs. etc.). Areas shall be fenced as necessary to
protect the vegetation. Vegetation such as trees, shrubs. e,Id other woody species, etc,
are funned to areas where considered appropriate. Lagoon areas should be kept moved
and ale_ Berms and structures should be inspected regularly for evidence of
2scsion, leakage or discharge.
18 If anirl:ai prodr;tion at the tacRity is to be suspended or Wrnina#ie-d, the owrer is
responsf le for obtaining and implementing a 'closure plan` which will eliminate the
P=SbWof an R"ZJ fie, DCOJU on and erosion.
19 W2sta handling stuctures. piping pumps, reels, etc., should bbir inspected on a regular
basis to prevent bre 2 kcicim s. leaks end spills. A regular maintenance ci,ecfdist should be
kept on site.
20 Ankml waste can be used in a rotation that in dudes vegetables and oilier craps for direct
human •cot', imtplim Hawe=. if zn:rnai wasta is used on crops far direct human
consumption it should only be applied pre -plant wLkh no iuther applica`ions animal waste
during the Crop season.
21 Highly Vile markem shall be installed to mark the top wd botfo n elevations of the
temporary storage (lznDing volume) or ai waste treatment lagoons. humping mall be
managed to mslrrfaln tine tiCg:id level between the markers. A marker .wiff be required to
mark the mmdmurra storage volume for waste storage ponds.
22 WasL- eta be tested within SO days of ofiRmtion and sail shalt be tested at least annuaVy
aE crap sites where uresle products are applied. Nitrogen shall be Erie rate -determining
element. Z"uic and cropper to -vets in ttre sail stall be monitored and alternative crop sites
shad. be used when these metal 2ppmam excessive levels. pH shag be adjusted for
cpdmium crop prWuctbn and maintained. Sol[ and waste analysis records she be kept
for lire years Poulxy, dry waste eppfimffion records shall be maintained for three (3)
years_ Waste application records for al other waste strait be maintained for ffve (-7 years.
`t kj
De2d anhmis WM be 4ispa.sed of in a nr"er that oriels Norfn Carolina regulations.
Page 7

1`0:54 ruldkIJ/1041ti1 11-14,1
+c-
WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN AGREEMENT
MarneoFFarm Lanston.Nurs-ery_ --
Owned UcwagarAgxaeawt- t
i (we) understand and vAH fzeow P-nd Irnptanvent the spwYjcaftm end the operation end
owirvteF=r-e prooedures estaNlst in the approved ar» and waste ul itgan plan for the
fond n2r77ed above. I (we) taxw VW any expansion to the existing design capac�ty of the
waste treahnent and starge system or constft=kn of new fadWes wdl requi-e a new
won b be submitted !n the Division of Envirwrnent Management (OEM) before tine
new er>knas are st zkacL t (we) also undarstand that there must tie no discharge ' of
2m na waste from this system to surface waters of the state fmrn a storm event Less
severe. fhan the 25-year. 24-hour storm. iheap,waved plan wiD be filed on -sits 21 the farm
office and at the of m of the local Soo and Water Conservation District and will be
avattable for review by DEM upon request
!tame of Fsaffitf Chwmr. Card Mann_._
{ 40" atV
Signahlre:� _ bate:
Name of Manager (If diff�:r� from owraefj
Signature: Date -
Name ofTechnital Spacsafrst: (numpnr4 Toni W. King
Afrasan: Murphy Brown, LLC
Address. (Agency): P.d- B= M
Warsaw, NC 2M98
Signahze � Date: 1 L O 5
Page 8

1]-ly-'11 1l:'sl EZsU7-
T-534 P001010010 F-197
2003/2004 Amendment
Grower may apply 100 ft, and apply Sept - April because this is not an ove—iseed.
Tract Field Soil Crop Lbs- N Acres Lbs. N Month of
A No. TvDe ParArre Utilized Aoaticat'ton
3107 LV--3
INOA Small Grain
1100
3A0
. 30
Sept- April.
3107 E-4
INOA Smai1 G,rast
IDOI
3.00
3N
Sepi- Ara
0
0
t
0
j Of
0
Q
a
Q
a
0
Total i r.0ul 5uU.UD�
-3 pis N is from animal wash3 only. !f nutrients from other sources such as comrnereal fertilizer are
applied, May must be accounted for iYmust he isased on reaGstiC yield expectatrwi.
NOTETire applicator is cautioned 6W P and K may he over applied ► while meeting the N
requbvim nm Beginning in 19W the Coas-W Zone Manaaemani Act mill require farmers in some
eastern counties of Norf r MaroPme hb have a nut- nt management plat: that addresses all nubienM
This plan only addrsssas Nitrogen.
ner! itarrager
Technical Specialist
Data
iZ-19 -03
Date

P
/V&j cy
Nutrient Management Plan For Animal Waste Utilization
11-26-2008
This plan has been prepared for:
Cypress Creek Farm31-274
Herschel W Jenkins
692 James Rd
Wallace, NC 28466
910-285-2403
This plan has been developed by:
Billy W Houston
Duplin Soil & Water Conservation
PO Box 219
Kenanwille, NC 28349
910-296-2120
RECEIVED / DENR 1 DWQ
Type of Plan: Nitrogen Only with Manure Only Aquift'r Protection Section
MAR 2 5 2009
Owner/Manager/Producer Agreement
I (we) understand and agree to the specifications and the operation and maintenance procedures
established in this nutrient management plan which includes an animal waste utilization plan for tht
farm named above. I have read and understand the Required Specifications concerning animal
waste management that are included with this plan.
jj(,L6 D
Signature (owner Date
Signature (manager or producer) Date
This plan meets the minimum standards and specifications of the U.S. DepartmMit of Agriculture -
Natural Resources Conservation Service or the standard of practices adopted b r
Conservation Commission. t t' 13
MAR 2 7 1UD9
Plan Approved By: �"-
Technical Specialist Signature Date
513412 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed 11-26-2008 Cover Page 1

Nutrients applied in accordance with this plan will be supplied from the following
source(s):
Commercial Fertilizer is not included in this plan.
S7 -
Swine Feeder -Finish Lagoon Liquid waste generated 2,447,280 gals/year by a 2,640
animal Swine Finishing Lagoon Liquid operation. This production facility has waste
sto a capacities of approximately 180 days.
Estimated Pounds of Plant Available Nitrogen Generated per Year
Broadcast
5637
Incorporated
9680
Injected
10661
Irrigated
6127
Max. Avail.
PAN (lbs) *
Actual PAN
Applied (Ibs)
PAN Surplus/
Deficit (lbs)
Actual Volume Volume Surplus/
Applied (Gallons) Deficit (Gallons)
Year 1
6,127
6360
-233
2,540,338-93,058
Note- In source ID. S means su<ndard sauce. U memos user defined son=- -- -�
* Max- Available PAN is calculated on the basis of the actual application methods) identified in the plan for this same.
513412 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 11-26-2008 Source Page Page 1 of 1

The table shown below provides a summary of the crops or rotations included in this plan for each field Realistic Yield estimates are
also provided for each crap in the plan. In addition, the Leaching Index for each field is shown, where available.
Planned Crops Summary
Tract
Field
Total
Acres
Useable
Aces
leaching
Index (L I)
Soil Series
Crop Sequence
RYE
4859
10
1.84
1.
NIA
Narfb&
Fesme Pasture
3.5 Tans
4859
11
1.941
1.94
NIA
Feaava Pasture
3.5 Tau
4859
12
2.65
2.65
ew= Pasum
3.5 Tons
4859
13
1.55
1.55
Effie
earns Pasture
3.5 Tom
7455
I
1.42
1.42
Grain Ovaseed
1.0 Tars
Hybrid 8-=WWass Hay
5.5 Tots
7455
2
1.241.26
NIA
k
smu Gram owaseed
1.0 Toes
Hybrid BamodaWatss Hay
3.5 Tars
7455
3
1.2A1.
N/A
A.Iryrilk
&=9 CkaieOverseed
1.0 TOM
Hybrid BanudaV- Hay
5.5 Tons
7455
4
1.65
1.65
NIA
orfo0c
Small Gram Ovaseed
1.0 Tons
Hybrid $amudagr- Hay
6.5 Tons
7455
5
334
3.34
NIA
Foresbm
Suall Caain Ovaaeed
1.0 Tons
Hybrid Bamudavrm Pzmm
6.0 Tons
7455
6
3.211
3.27
NIA
Foreston
SaWl Grain Oveneed
1.0 Tons
Hybrid Baa xkrza Pasture
6.0 Tons
7455
7
2.43
2.43
NIA
Norfolk
5mail Grain Owavead
lA Tam
Hybrid Ban-dagrasa Pashas
6.5 Tons
7455
8
1.69
1.69
NIA
Norfb&
Snuff Grain Overseed
1.0 Tans
Hybrid Berme Np= Prier
6.5 Tons
7455
9
1.2
1.28
NIA
Norfolk
Small Grant Ovaseed
1.0 Torus
Hybrid Ban-da- P-t-
6.5 Tara
PLAN TOTALS: 25.61 25.61
513412 Database vasim 3.1 Dane Printed 11126/20118
1'CS Page Page I of 2
NOTE: Symbol 0 means user entered data.

u
Pofcntfar
TedmicarGuidance
Low poccoftel to coambute io soluble
Bone
< 2
mariew laadmg below ma toot me.
>= 2 &
ModW to pto oaUhi'bute tb sokkk
Nabico M (5W) dKn!d be planned.
lricM below fie toot zoce.
High potaitaal to ooatri'buta to soluble
Nutrient Management (590) should be pb nood. Other conservation practices that improw the soils
nutrient leaching below the root zone.
available water holding cvwdy and nnptove mm iaU use efficiency should be considered. Examples
> 10
— Co— Crops (340) to seavango mmi-K So&Baaed Rotations (328). Lang-Tauq No -Till (779),
and edge of-fceid practices such as >=dtor Strips (393) mid Riprian Faust Boilers (391)-
513412 batabam Version 3.1 Date Primed 1112&2008
NOTE 'Symbol • means user entered data.
PCS Page PaW 2 of 2

Tlx: Waste Utilization table shown below summarizes the waste utilization plan Iur this operation. This plan provides an estimate of the number of acres of cropland needed to use the
nutrients being produced, The plan requires cu mideration ofthe realistic yields of the craps to be grown, their nutrient requirements, and proper tinting of applications to maximize nutrient
uplalte.
This table provides an estimate of the amount of nitrogen required by the crop being grown and an estimate of the nitrogen amount being supplied by manure or other by-products,
commercial fertilizer and residual from previous crops. An estimate of the quantity of solid and liquid waste that will be applied on each field in order to supply the indicated quantity of
nitrogen from each source is also included, A balance of the total manure produced and the: total manure applied is included in the table to ensure that the plan adequately provides for the
utilization of the manure generated by the operation,
Waste Utilization Table
Year 1
Tract
Field
Source
ID
Soil Series
Tolal
Acres
Use,
Acres
Crop
RYE
APPlic.
Period
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
Req'd
OVA)
Comm.
Fen.
Nutrient
Applied
tlbdA)
Ree,
OWA)
Ap*.
MleMod
Manure
PA
NuukntA
*Cd
(P*A)
Liquid
MmtmA
ppliod
(acre)
Sold
Mamn
Applied
(acts)
Liquid
Menus
Applied
Meld)
Salk1
Mtmtue
Applied
(Fidel)
N
N
N
N
1000
ge1/A
Tom
1000 gals
tone
4859
t0
S7
Norfolk
1.84
1.84
Fescue Pasture
3.3 Tom
8/1-7131
•131
0
0
Irrig
131
52.33
0.00
96.28
0.00
4859
11
S7
Norfolk
1.94
1.94
Fescue Pasture
3.5 Tons
8/1-7131
0131
0
0
Irrig,
l31
52.33
0.00
101.51
D.0
4859
12
S7
Norlblk
2.65
2,65
Fescue Pasture
3.3 Tone
811-7131
•131
0
0
Irri&
131
32.33
0.00
138.67
0.00
4859
13
S7
Norfolk
1.55
1.53
Fescue Pasture
3.3 Tons
$11-7131
8131
0
0
brig
1 131
52.33
0.00
81.11
0.00
7455
1
S7
AutryWic
L42
1.42
Small Grain OvcFscW
1.0 Tons
1011-3131
50
0
0
Irrig.
50
19.9
0.00
28.36
o.00
7455
1
S7
Autryville
1,42
1.42
Hybrid 13ermudagraas Hay
5.3 Tons
311-9130
4275
0
0
Irri&
275
109,93
0.00
155.98
0.00
7455
2
S7
Autryville
1.26
1,26
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tone
10/1-3/31
50
0
0
Irrig.
50
19.97
0.00
25.I7
0.00
7455
2
S7
Autryville
1.26
1.26
Hybrid Betmudagrass Hay
5.5 Tons
3/1.9130
0275
0
0
brig.
275
109,85
0.00
138.41
0.00
7455
3
S7
Autryvil{e
1129
1.29
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
10/1-3/31
50
0
0
Irrig
SO
19.97
0.00
25.76
0.00
7455
3
S7
Autryville
1.29
1.29
Hybrid Plermudagrass Hay
5.3 Tons
311A130
9275
0
0
lrri&
275
109.85
0.00
141.70
0.00
7455
4
S7
Norfolk
1.65
1.63
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
1011.3131
50
0
0
brig.
50
19.97
0.00
32.95
0.00
7455
4
S7
Norfolk
1.65
1.65
Hybrid I3ermudagmss Hay
6.5 Tons
311-9130
0325
0
0
Irrig,
325
129.82
0,00
214.20
0.00
7455
5
S7
Foraston
3.34
3,34
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
10/1.3131
50
0
0
Irrig
50
19.97
0.00
66.71
0.00
7455
5
S7
Foreston
3.34
3.34
Hybrid Bermudagrass Pasture
6.0 Tons
311-9130
0225
0
0
Irrig,
225
89.87
0.00
300.18
0.00
7455
6
57
FOregon
3,27
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
1011-3131
50
0
0
brig.
50
19.9
0,00
65,31
0.00
7455
6
87
Foreston
j
3.27
Hybrid i3ermudagrass Pasture
6.0'Ions
3/1-9l30
•22S
0
0
{trig.
225
89.8
0.00
293.89
0.0
51,412 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 11/26/2008 WUT Page Page 1 of 2

Wusty Utilization Table
Wa, i I
Tract
Field
Source
U)
Soil Series
Total
Acres
Use.
I Acres
Crop
RYE
App11c,
Period
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
ReWd
(IWA)
Comm.
Fed.
Nutrient
Applied
(IbdA)
Res.
OWA)
Applic.
Method
Mangy
PA
NutrientA
ppbcd
(IWA)
liquid
ManureA
p*d
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
I LkpW
Manure
APPEW
(Field)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
lV
N
N
I N
1000
pYA
Tons
I000 gals
tons
7455
7
S7
INorfalk
2.43
2.43
Small Grain Qverwed
1.0 Tons
I011-3/31
50
0
0
Irrig.
50
19.9
0.00
48.33
0.00
7433
7
S7
Nudi)lk
2.43
2.43
Hybrid nerniudagrass Pasture
6.5 Tons
311-9i30
$244
0
0
irrig
244
97.
0.00
236.94
0.00.
7455
8
S7
Norfolk
1.69
1.69
Stnall Grain Overwed
1.0 Tom
10/1-3131
50
0
0
Irrig.
50
19.97
0.00
33.75
0.00
7455
8
S7
Norfolk
1.69
1,69
Hybrid Bernrudagrass Pasture
6.5 Tents
3/1-9130
$244
0
0
Irrig.
244
97,46
0.
164.71
0.00
7455
9
S7
Norfolk
1.28
1.28
Steal! Crain Oversood
1.0 Tom
10/1-3131
50
0
0
brig.
so
19.97
0,00
25.36
0.00
7435
9
S7
Norfolk
1.281
1.28
Hybrid Berrnudagrass Pasture
6.3 Tons
311-9/30
$244
0
0
brig
244
97.46
0.00
124.75
0.00
Total Apo* 1000 gallons
2,540,34
Taut) Produce4 1000 p8 m
2.447. 29
BdwrA 1000ya6om
-93.06
ToW Applied, tons
0.00
Total Produoad, tore
0.
Balm, tons
0.
Notes: 1. In the tract column, - symbol means leased, otherwise, owned. 2. Symbol ' means user entered data.
511412 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 1 I/26/2008 WUf Page Page 2 of 2

The Irrigation Application Factors for each field in this plan are shown in the following table. Infiltration rate varies with soils. if
applying waste nutrients through an irrigation systan, you must apply at a rate that will not result in runoff This table provides the
maximum application rate per hour that may be applied to each field selected to receive wastewater. it also lists the maximum
application amount that each field may receive in any one application evens.
Irrigation Application Factors
Tract
Field
Soil Series
Application Rate
Or
Application Amount
()
4859
10
Norfolk
0.50
1.0
4859
11
Norfolk
0.50
1.0
4859
12
Norfolk
0.50
l A
4859
13
Norfolk
0.50
1.0
7455
1
Autryville
0.60
1.0
7455
2
Autryville
0.60
1.0
7455
3
Autryville
0.60
1.0
7455
4
Norfolk
0.50
1.0
7455
5
Foreston
0.50
1.0
7455
6
Foreston
0.50
1.0
7455
7
Norfolk
0.50
1.0
7455
8
Norfolk
0.50
1.0
7455
9
orfolk
0.50
1.0
513412 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed 11/26/2008 1AF Page Page 1 of 1
NOTE: Svmbol ' means user entered data.

The following lagoon Sludge Nitrogen Utilization table provides an estimate of the number of acres needed for sludge utilization
for the indicated accumulation period. These estimates are based on average nitrogen concentrations for each source_ the number of
animals in the facility and the plant available nitrogen application rates shown in the second column.
Lagoon sludge contains nutrients and organic matter remaining after treatment and application of the effluent_ At clean out, this
material must be utilized for crop production and applied at agronomic rates In most cases, the priority nutrient is nitrogen but
other nutrients including phosphorous, capper and zinc can also be limiting. Since nutrient levels are generally very high,
application of sludge must be carefully applied -
Sites must first be evaluated for their suitability for sludge application. Ideally, effluent spray fields should not be used for sludge
application. If this is not possible, care should be taken not to load effluent application fields with high amounts of copper and zinc
so that additional effluent cannot be applied. On sites vuhi cable to surface water moving to streams and lakes, phosphorous is a
concern. Soils containing very high phosphorous levels may also be a concern_
Lagoon Sludge Nitrogen Utilization Table
Crop
Maximum
PA-N Rate
Ib/ac
Mwdmwn Sludge
Application Rate
1000 gal/ac
Minimum Acres
5 Years Accumulation
Minimum Acres
10 Years Accumulation
Minimum Acres
15 Years Accumulation
Swine Feeder -Finish Lagoon Sludge - Standard
Can 120 bu
150
13.16
33.10
66.19
99.29
Hay 6 tan R-Y.E.
300
26.32
16.55
33.10
49.64
Soybean 40 bu
160
14.04
31.03
62.06
93.08
513412 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 11-26-2008 Sludge Page Page 1 of

The Available Waste Storage Capacity table pnivides an estimate of the number of days of storage capacity available at
the end of each month of the plan. Available storage capacity is calculated as the design storage capacity in days minas
the number of days of net storage volume accumulated- The start date is a value entered by the user and is defined as the
date prior to applying nutrients to the first crop in the plan at which storage volume in the lagaan or holding pond is
equal to zero.
Available storage capacity should be greater than or equal to zero and less than or equal to the design storage capacity of
the facility. If the available storage capacity is greater than the design storage capacity, this indicates that the plan calls
for the application of nutrients that have not yet accuomulated. If available storage capacity is negative, the estimated
volume of accumulated waste exceeds the design storage volume of the structure. Either of these situations indicates
that the planned application interval in the waste utilization plan is inconsistent with the structure's temporary storage
capacity_
Available Waste Storap>e Canacity
Source Name
I Swine Feeler -Finish La n Liquid
Design Storage Capacity (Days)
Start Date
9/ 1
180
Plan Year
Month
Available Storage Capacity (Days) «
1
1
95
1
2
78
1
3
95
1
4
116
1
5
136
1
6
147
1
7
157
1
8
167
1
9
178
1
10
155
1
11
144
1
12
132
* Available Storage Capacity is calculated as of the end of each month_
513412 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed 11-26-2008 Capacity Page Page 1 of I

Required Specifications For Animal Waste Management
1. Animal waste shall not reach surface waters of the state by runoff, drift,
manmade conveyances, direct application, or direct discharge during operation
or land application. Any discharge of waste that reaches surface water is
prohibited.
2. There must be documentation in the design folder that the producer either owns
or has an agreement for use of adequate land on which to properly apply the
waste. If the producer does not own adequate land to properly dispose of the
waste, he/she shall provide evidence of an agreement with a landowner, who is
within a reasonable proximity, allowing him/her the use of the land for waste
application. It is the responsibility of the owner of the waste production facility to
secure an update of the Nutrient Management Plan when there is a change in the
operation, increase in the number of animals, method of application, receiving
crop type, or available land.
3. Animal waste shall be applied to meet, but not exceed, the nitrogen needs for
realistic crop yields based upon soil type, available moisture, historical data,
climatic conditions, and level of management, unless there are regulations that
restrict the rate of applications for other nutrients.
4. Animal waste shall be applied to land eroding less than 5 tons per acre per year.
Waste may be applied to land eroding at more than 5 tons per acre per year but
less than 10 tons per acre per year provided grass filter strips are installed where
runoff leaves the field (see USDA, NRCS Field Office Technical Guide Standard
393 - Filter Strips).
5. Odors can be reduced by injecting the waste or by disking after waste application
Waste should not be applied when there is danger of drift from the land
application field.
6. When animal waste is to be applied on acres subject to flooding, waste will be soil
incorporated on conventionally tilled cropland. When waste is applied to
conservation tilled crops or grassland, the waste may be broadcast provided the
application does not occur during a season prone to flooding (see "Weather and
Climate in North Carolina" for guidance).
7. Liquid waste shall be applied at rates not to exceed the soil infiltration rate such
that runoff does not occur offsite or to surface waters and in a method which does
not cause drift from the site during application. No ponding should occur in order
to control odor and flies.
50412 Database Version 3.1 ©ate Printed: 11/26/2008 Specification Page 1

& Animal waste shall not be applied to saturated soils, during rainfall events, or
when the soil surface is frozen.
9. Animal waste shall be applied on actively growing crops in such a manner that
the crop is not covered with waste to a depth that would inhibit growth. The
potential for salt damage from animal waste should also be considered.
10. Nutrients from waste shall not be applied in fall or winter for spring planted
crops on soils with a high potential for leaching. Wasteinutrient loading rates on
these soils should be held to a minimum and a suitable winter cover crop planted
to take up released nutrients. Waste shall not be applied more than 30 days prior
to planting of the crop or forages breaking dormancy.
11. Any new swine facility sited on or after October 1,1995 shall comply with the
following: The outer perimeter of the land area onto which waste is applied from
a lagoon that is a component of a swine farm shall be at least 50 feet from any
residential property boundary and canal. Animal waste, other than swine waste
from facilities sited on or after October 1,1995, shall not be applied closer that
25 feet to perennial waters.
12. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 100 feet to wells.
13. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 200 feet of dwellings other than
those owned by the landowner.
14. Waste shall be applied in a manner not to reach other property and public
right-of-ways.
15. Animal waste shall not be discharged into surface waters, drainageways, or
wetlands by a discharge or by over -spraying. Animal waste may be applied to
prior converted cropland provided the fields have been approved as a land
application site by a "technical specialist". Animal waste shall not be applied on
grassed waterways that discharge directly into water courses, and on other
grassed waterways, waste shall be applied at agronomic rates in a manner that
causes no runoff or drift from the site.
16. Domestic and industrial waste from washdown facilities, showers, toilets, sinks,
etc., shall not be discharged into the animal waste management system.
513412 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 11/26/2008 Specification Page 2

17. A protective cover of appropriate vegetation will be established on all disturbed
areas (lagoon embankments, berms, pipe runs, etc.). Areas shall be fenced, as
necessary, to protect the vegetation. Vegetation such as trees, shrubs, and other
woody species, etc., are limited to areas where considered appropriate. Lagoon
areas should be kept mowed and accessible. Berms and structures should be
inspected regularly for evidence of erosion, leakage, or discharge.
M ' If animal production at the facility is to be suspended or terminated, the owner is
responsible for obtaining and implementing a "closure plan" which will eliminate
the possibility of an illegal discharge, pollution, and erosion.
11
19. Waste handling structures, piping, pumps, reels, etc., should be inspected on a
regular basis to prevent breakdowns, leaks, and spills. A regular maintenance
checklist should be kept on site.
20. Animal waste can be used in a rotation that includes vegetables and other crops
for direct human consumption. However, if animal waste is used on crops for
direct human consumption, it should only be applied pre -plant with no further
applications of animal waste during the crop season.
21. Highly visible markers shall be installed to mark the top and bottom elevations of
the temporary storage (pumping volume) of all waste treatment lagoons.
Pumping shall be managed to maintain the liquid level between the markers. A
marker will be required to mark the maximum storage volume for waste storage
ponds.
22. Waste shall be tested within 60 days of utilization and soil shall be tested at least
annually at crop sites where waste products are applied. Nitrogen shall be the
rate -determining nutrient, unless other restrictions require waste to be applied
based on other nutrients, resulting in a lower application rate than a nitrogen
based rate. Zinc and copper levels in the soils shall be monitored and alternative
crop sites shall be used when these metals approach excessive levels. pH shall be
adjusted and maintained for optimum crop production. Soil and waste analysis
records shall be kept for a minimum of five years. Poultry dry waste application
records shall be maintained for a minimum of three years.
Waste application records for all other waste shall be maintained for five (5)
years.
23. Dead animals will l be disposed of in a manner that meets North Carolina
regulations.
513412 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 11/26(2008 Specification Page 3

Crop Notes
The following crop note applies to field(s): 4
Bermudagrass Coastal Plain, Mineral Soil, Moderately Well Drained.
Adaptation: Well -adapted -
In the Coastal Plain, hybrid bermudagrass sprigs can be planted Mar. 1 to Mar. 31. Cover sprigs 1" to 3"
deep (1 5" optimal). Sprigs should be planted quickly after digging and not allowed to dry in sun and wind.
For Coastal and Tifton 78 plant at least 10 bu/ac in 3' rows, spaced 2' to 3' in the row. Generally a rate of
30 bu/ac is satisfactory to produce full groundcover in one or two years under good growing conditions.
Tifton 44 spreads slowly, so use at least 40 bu/ac in 1.5' to 2' rows spaced 1' to 1.5' in row. For
broadcast/disked-in sprigs use about 60 bu/ac. Soil test for the amounts of lime, phosphorus, potassium
and micronutrients to apply preplant and for annual maimeaance- Apply 60 to 100 lb/ac N in the
establishment year in split applications in April and July. For established stands apply 180 to 240 lb/ac N
annually in split applications, usually in April and following the first and second hay cuts. Reduce N rates
by 25% for grazing. Refer to NCSU Technical Bulletin 305 Production and Utilization of Pastures and
Forages in North Carolina for more information or consult your regional agronomist or extension agent for
assisw=.
The following crop note applies to field(s): 1, 2, 3
Bermudagrass Coastal Plain, Mineral Soil, Moderately Well Drained.
Adaptation: Well -adapted.
In the Coastal Plain, hybrid bermudagrass sprigs can be planted Mar. I to Mar- 31. Cover sprigs 1" to 37'
deep (1.5" optimal). Sprigs should be planted quickly after digging and not allowed to dry in sun and wind.
For Coastal and Tifton 78 plant at least 10 bu/ac in 3' rows, spaced 2' to 3' in the row. Generally a rate of
30 bu/ac is satisfactory to produce full groundcover in one or two years under good growing conditions.
Tifton 44 spreads slowly, so use at least 40 bu/ac in 1.5' to 2' rows spaced 1' to 1.5' in row. For
broadcast/disked-in sprigs use about 60 bu/ac. Soil test for the amounts of lime, phosphorus, potassium
and nucronutnents to apply preplant and for annual maintenance. Apply 60 to 100 lb/ac N in the
establishment year in split applications in April and July. For established stands apply 180 to 240 lb/ac N
annually in split applications, usually in April and fallowing the first and second hay cuts. Reduce N rates
by 25% for grazing. Refer to NCSU Technical Bulletin 305 Production and Utilization of Pastures and
Forages in North Carolina for more information or consult your regional agronomist or extension agent for
assistance.
513412 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed. 11-26-2008 Crop Note Page Page 1 of 4

The following crop note applies to field(s): 10, 11, 12, 13
Fescue: Coastal Plain. Mineral Soli, Moderately Well Drained
Adaptation: Marginal.
In the Coastal Plain, tall fescue can be planted Sept. 1 to Oct. 15 (best) and Feb. 15 to Mar_ 20. For
pure -stand broadcast soedings use 20 to 30 Wk.. for drilled use 15 to 20 lb/ac. seed. Use certified seed to
avoid introducing weeds or annual ryegrass. Plant seed 0.25" to 0.5" deep for pure stands, 0.25" in mixture
with clovers. Tall fescue requires adequate soil moisture for persistence and production. Soil test for
preplant and maintenance lime, phosphorus, and potassium neon nendafions_ Apply 40 to 60 lb/ac
nitrogen at planting for pure stands only. Do not apply N for mixtures with clovers but use proper legume
inoculation techniques. Apply 150 to 200 lb/ac. N to pure -stand fescue for hay production; reduce N rates
by 25% for grazing. Apply N Feb. I to Mar. 20 and Aug. 20 to Sept. 30, with equal amounts in each
window. Refer to NCSU Technical Bulletin 305 Producxion and Utilization of Pastries and Forages in
North Carolina for additional information or consult your regional agronomist or extension agent for
assistance.
The following crop note applies to field(s): 5, 6
Small Grain. CP, Mineral Soil, low -leachable
1n the Coastal Plain, oats and barley should be planted from October 15-October 30, and rye from October
15-November 20. For barley, plant 22 seed/drill row foot and increase the seeding rate by 5% for each
week seeding is delayed beyond the optimum time. See the seeding rates table for applicable seeding rate
modifications in the current NCSU "Small Grain Production Guide". Also, increase the initial seeding rate
by at least 10% when planting no -till. Oats should be planted at 2 bushelslacre and rye at 1-1 1/2
bushels/acre. Plant all these small grains at 1-1 1/2" deep. Adequate depth control is essential. Review the
NCSU Official Variety "green book" and information from private companies to select a high yielding
variety with the characteristics needed for your area and conditions. Apply no more than 30 lbs/acre N at
planting. Phosphorus and potash recommended by a soil test can also be applied at this time. The
remaining N should be applied during the months of February -March.
The following crop note applies to field(s): 4, 7, S, 9
Small Grain: CP, Mineral Soil, medium leachable
In the Coastal Plain, oats and barley should be planted from October 15-October 30, and rye from October
15 November 20. For barley, plant 22 seed/drill row foot and increase the seeding rate by 5% for each
week seeding is delayed beyond the optimum time. See the seeding rates table for applicable seeding rate
modifications in the current NCSU "Small Grain Production Guide". Also, increase the initial seeding rate
by at least 10% when planting no -till. Oats should be planted at 2 bushels/acre and rye at 1-1 1/2
bushels/acre. Plant all these small grains at 1-1 1/2" deep. Adequate depth control is essential. Review the
NCSU Official Variety "green book" and information from private companies to select a high yielding
variety with the characteristics needed for your area and conditions. Apply no more than 30 lbs/acre N at
planting. Phosphorus and potash recommended by a soil test can also be applied at this time. The
remaining N should be applied during the months of February -March.
513412 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed 11-26-2008 Crop Note Page Page 2 of 4

The following crop note applies to field(s): 1. 1
Small Grain: CP, Mineral Soil. medium leachable
In the Coastal Plain, oats and barley should be planted from October 15-October 30; and rye from October
15-November 20. For barley, plant 22 seed/drill row foot and increase the seeding rate by 5% for each
week seeding is delayed beyond the optimum time. See the seeding rates table for applicable seeding rate
modifications in the current NCSU "Small Grain Production Guide". Also, increase the initial seeding rate
by at least 10% when planting no -till. Oats should be planted at 2 bushels/acre and rye at 1-1 1/2
bushels/acre. Plant all these small grains at 1-1 1/2" deep. Adequate depth control is essential. Review the
NCSU Official Variety "green book" and information ftom private companies to select a high yielding
variety with the characteristics needed for your area and conditiam. Apply no more than 30 lbs/acre N at
planting. Phosphorus and potash recominended by a soil test can also be applied at this time. The
remaining N should be applied during the months of February -March.
The following crop note applies to field(s): 5, 6
Bermuda ss CP, Mineral Soil, Poorly Drained to Somewhat Poorly Drained.
Adaptation: Effective artificial drainage MUST be in place to achieve Realistic Yield Expectations
provided for these soils_
In the Coastal Plain, hybrid bermudagrass sprigs can be planted Mar. 1 to Mar. 31. Cover sprigs 1" to 3"
deep (1.5" optimal). Sprigs should be planted quicJdy after digging and not allowed to dry in sun and wind.
For Coastal and Tifton 78 plant at least 10 bu/ac in 3' rows, spaced 2' to 3' in the row. Generally a rate of
30 bu/ac is satisfactory to produce full groundcover in one or two years under good growing conditions.
Tifton 44 spreads slowly, so use at least 40 bu/ac in 1.5' to 2' rows spaced 1' to 1.5' in row. For
broadcast/disked-in sprigs use about 60 bu/ac. Soil test for the amounts of lime, phosphorus, potassium
and micronutrients to apply preplant and for annual maintenance. Apply 60 to 100 lb/ac N in the
establishment year in split applications in April and July. For established stands apply 180 to 240 lb/ac N
annually in split applications, usually in April and following the first and second hay cuts. Reduce N rates
by 25% for grazing. Refer to NCSU Technical Bulletin 305 Production and Utilization of Pastures and
Forages in North Carolina for more information or consult your regional agronomist or extension agent for
assistance.
513412 Database Vernon 3.1 Dale Printed: 11-26-2008 Crop Note Page Page 3 of 4

The following crop note applies to field(s): 7, 8, 9
Betmudagrass. CP, Mineral Soil, Moderatelv Well Drained.
Adaptation: Well -adapted.
In the Coastal Plain_ hybrid bermudagrass sprigs can be planted Mar, l to Mar. 31. Cover sprigs 1" to 3"
deep (1.5" optimal). Sprigs should be planted quickly after digging and not allowed to dry in sun and wind.
For Coastal and Tifton 78 plant at least 10 bu/ac in 3' rows, spaced 2' to 3' in the row. Generally a rate of
30 bu/ac is satisfactory to produce full groundcover in one or two years under good growing conditions.
Tifton 44 spreads slowly, so use at least 40 bu/ac in 1.5' to 2' rows spaced 1' to 1-5' in row. For
broadeast/disked-in sprigs use about 60 bu/ac_ Soil test for the amounts of time, phosphorus, potassium
and micronutnents to apply preplant and for annual maintenance. Apply 60 to 100 lb/ac N in the
establishment year in split applications in April and July. For established stands apply 180 to 240 lb/ac N
annually in split applications, usually in April and following the first and second hay cuts. Reduce N rates
by 25% for grazing. Refer to NCSU Technical Bulletin 305 Production and Utilization of Pastures and
Forages in North Carolina for more information or consult your regional agronomist or extension agent for
assistance.
513412 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 11-26-2008 Crop Note Page Page 4 of 4

o�CF W R rF9QG Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
0) 7 North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Coleen H. Sullins, Director
Division of Water Quality
July 1, 2007 In-OCEIVEL
Herschel W Jenkins
Cypress Creek Farm JUN 2 6 2007
692 James Rd
Wallace, NC 28466 I3Y:
Subject: Certificate of Coverage No. AWS310274
Cypress Creek Farm
Animal Waste Management System
Duplin County
Dear Herschel W Jenkins: .
In accordance with your application received on 18-Dec-06, we are hereby forwarding to you this
Certificate of Coverage (COC) issued to Herschel W Jenkins, authorizing the operation of the subject
animal waste management. system in accordance with General Permit AWG100000,
This approval shall consist of the operation of this system including, but not limited to, the management
and land application of animal waste as specified in the facility's Certified Animal Waste Management
Plan (CAWMP) for the Cypress Creek Farm, located in Duplin County, with an animal .capacity of no
greater than the following swine annual averages:
Wean to Finish: 0 Feeder to Finish: 2640 Boar/Stud: 0
Wean to Feeder: 0 Farrow to Wean: 0 Gilts: 0
Farrow to Finish: 0 Farrow to Feeder: 0
If this is a Farrow to Wean or Farrow to Feeder operation, there may also be one boar for each 15 sows.
Where boars are unneccessary, they may be replaced by an equivalent number of sows. Any of the sows
may be replaced by gilts at a rate of 4 gilts for every 3 sows
The COC shall be effective from the date of issuance until September 30, 2009 and replaces the NPDES
COC issued to this facility with an expiration date of July 1, 2007. You are required to continue
conducting annual surveys of sludge accumulation in all lagoons at your facility; the one-year extension
in Condition 1H.19 does not apply.
Pursuant to this COC, you are authorized and required to operate the system in conformity with the
conditions and limitations as specified in the General Permit, the facility's CAWMP, and this COC. An
adequate system for collecting and maintaining the required monitoring data and operational information
must be established for this facility. Any increase in waste production greater than the certified design
capacity or increase in number of animals authorized by this COC (as provided above) will require a
modification to the CAWMP and this COC and must be completed prior to actual increase in either
wastewater flow or number of animals.
Please carefully read this COC and the enclosed State General Permit. Enclosed for your convenience is
a package containing the new and revised forms used for record keeping and reporting. Please pay
careful attention to the record keeping and monitoring conditions in this permit.
Aquifer Protection Section 1636 Mail Service Center
Internet: www.ncwat=uality.org Location: 2728 Capital Boulevard
An Equal Opportunity/AtfirmaNe Action Employer— 50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper
No Carolina
NOtum ily
Raleigh, NC 27699-1636 "telephone: [phone]
Raleigh, NC 27604 Fax 1: [phone]
Fax 2: (919)715-60,48
Customer Service: [phone]

If your Waste Utilization Plan has been developed based on site -specific information, careful evaluation
of future samples is necessary. Should your records show that the current Waste Utilization Plan is
inaccurate you will need to have a new Waste Utilization Plan developed.
The issuance of this COC does not excuse the Permittee from the obligation to comply with all applicable
laws, rules; standards, and ordinances (local, state, and federal), nor does issuance of a COC to operate
under this permit convey any property rights in either real or personal property.
Upon abandonment or depopulation for a period of four years or more, the Permittee must submit
documentation to the Division demonstrating that all current NRCS standards are met prior to restocking
of the facility. .
1.
Per 15A NCAC 02T .0111(c) a compliance boundary is provided for the facility and no new water supply
wells shall be constructed within the compliance boundary. Per MRCS standards a 100-foot separation
shall be maintained between water supply wells and any lagoon, storage pond, or any wetted area of a
spray field.
Per 15A NCAC 02T .1306, any containment basin, such as a lagoon or waste storage structure, shall
continue to be subject to the conditions and requirements of the facility's permit until closed to NRCS
standards and the permit is rescinded by the Division.
Please be advised that any violation of the terms and conditions specified in this COC, the General Permit
or the CAWMP may result in the revocation of this COC, or penalties in accordance with NCGS 143-
215.6A through 143-215.6C including civil penalties, criminal penalties, and injunctive relief.
If you wish to continue the activity permitted under the General Permit after the expiration date of the
General Permit, an application for renewal must be filed at least 180 days prior to expiration.
This COC is not automatically transferable. A name/ownership change application must be submitted to
the Division prior to a name change or change in ownership.
If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this COC are unacceptable, you have the right to
apply for an individual permit by contacting the staff member listed below for information on this
process. Unless such a request is made within 30 days, this COC shall be final and binding.
This facility is located in a county covered by our Wilmington Regional Office. The Regional Office
Aquifer Protection staff may be reached at 910-395-3900. If you need additional information concerning
this COC or the General Permit, please contact the Animal Feeding Operations Unit staff at (919) 733-
3221.
Sincerely,
for Coleen H. Sullins
Enclosures (General Permit AWG 100000, Record Keeping and Reporting Package)
cc: (Certificate of Coverage only for all cc's)
Duplin County Health Department
Duplin County Soil and Water Conservation District
Wilmington Regional Office, Aquifer Protection Section
AFO Unit Central Files
Permit File AWS310274

ANIMAL FACILITY ANNUAL CERTIFICATION FORM
Y Certificate of Coverage or Permit Number A 04- 310 a %y County -D �,=jj A • h _ Year 200_a
Facility Name (as shown on Certificate of Coverage or Permit) L4are s s &t ek- Fart2a ts a -
Operator in Charge for this Facility _ 4f— h,e�f-- ( Te-, , LL ✓1 S Certification # 1 %2 31 Se
Land application of animal waste as allowed by the above permit occurred during the past calendar year
�_ YES - NO. If NO, skip Part I and Part H and proceed to the certification. Also, if animal waste
was generate brut not land applied, please attach an explanation on how the animal waste was handled.
Part I: Facility Information:
1. Total number of application Fields C or Pulls {please check the appropriate box) in the Certified Animal
Waste Management Plan (CAWMP): , % _ Total Useable Acres approved in the CAWW
2. Total number of Fields ❑ or Pulls "lease check the appropriate box) on which land application
occurred during the year: . 13 Total Acres on which waste was applied .�S-
3. Total pounds of Plant Available Nitrogen (PAN) applied during the year for all application sites:
,573�.-7
4. Total pounds of Plant Available Nitrogen (PAN) allowed to be land applied annually by the CAWMP and
the permit:
S. Estimated amount of total manure, litter and process wastewater sold or given to other persons and taken
off site during the year ryw , tons ❑ or gallons ❑ (please check the appropriate box)
6. Annual average number of animals by type at thisfacilityduring the previous year:
{�
[ �� �
i. Largest and smallest number of animals by type at this facility at any one time during the previous year.
Largest 2 7 �2- C.
Smallest
(These numbers are for informational purposes only since the only permit limit on the number of animals
at the facility. is the annual average numbers)
8. Facility's Integratorif applicable: r.L.YlC]1iy 1,��6ii' t,
Part II: Facility Status:
IF THE ANSWER TO ANY -STATEMENT BELOW IS "NO", PLEASE PROVIDE A WRITTEN
DESCRIPTION AS TO WHY THE FACILITY WAS NOT COMPLIANT, THE DATES OF ANY NON
COMPLIANCE, AND EXPLAIN CORRECTIVE ACTION TAKEN OR PROPOSED TO BE TAKEN TO
BRING THIS FACILITY BACK INTO COMPLIANCE.
1. Only animal waste generated at this facility was applied to the permitted sites during dyes ❑ No
the past calendar year.
AFAC F 3-14-03

2. The facility was operated in such a way that there was no direct rnmoff of waste from
U Yes ❑ No t'
the facility (including the houses, lagoons/storage ponds and the application sites) during
the past calendar year.
y
I There was no discharge of waste to surface water from this facility during the past
Yes ❑ No
calendar year.
4. There was no freeboard violation in any lagoons or storage ponds at this facility during
E(Yes ❑ No
the past calendar year.
5. There was no PAN application to any fields or crops at this facility greater than the
levels specified in this facility's CAWMP during the past calendar year.
MYes ❑ No
6. All land application equipment was calibrated at least once during the past calendar year.
❑ Yes El No
7. Sludge accumulation in all lagoons did not exceed the volume for which the lagoon
❑ Yes IId No
was designed or reduce the lagoon's minimum treatment volume to less than the volume
for which the lagoon was designed.
8. A copy of the Annual Sludge Survey Form for this facility is attached to this Certification.
11 Yes �(No
9. Annual soils analysis were performed on each field receiving animal waste during the
dYes ❑ No
past calendar year.
10. Soil pH was maintained as specified in the permit during the past calendar Year?
Q/Yes ❑ No
11. All required monitoring and reporting was performed in accordance with the facility's
B Yes ❑ No
permit during the past calendar year.
12. All operations and maintenance requirements in the permit were complied with during
❑ Yes ErNo
the past calendar year or, in the case of a deviation, prior authorization was received
from the Division of Water Quality.. 5 c e— u as fii vvt 7
dYes
13. Crops as specified in the CAWMP were maintained during the past calendar year on all
❑ No
sites receiving animal waste and the crops grown were removed in accordance with
the facility's permit:
14. All buffer requirements as specified on the permit and the CAWMP for this facility were
1J Yes ❑ No
maintained during each application of animal waste during the -past calendar year.
`.`1 certify under penalty of law that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or
supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gather'and
evaluate the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or persons who manage the system, or
those persons directly responsible for gathering the information, the information submitted is, to the best of
my knowledge and belief, true, accurate, and complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties for
submitting false information, including the possibility of fines and imprisonment for knowing violations."
ame ana i sue (tvoe or
Date
Date
different from Permittee)
AFACF 3-14-03- 2

If your Waste Utilization Plan has been developed based on site specific information, careful evaluation
of future samples is necessary. Should your records show that the current Waste Utilization Plan is
inaccurate you will need to have a new Waste Utilization Plan developed.
The issuance of this COC does not excuse the Permittee from the obligation to comply with all applicable
laws, rules, standards, and ordinances (local, state, and federal), nor does issuance of a COC to operate
under this permit convey any property rights in either real or personal property.
Upon abandonment or depopulation for a period of four years or more, the Permittee must submit
documentation to the Division demonstrating that all current NRCS standards are met prior to restocking
of the facility.
Per 15A NCAC 2H .0225(c) a compliance boundary is provided for the facility and no new water supply
wells shall be constructed within the compliance boundary. Per NRCS standards a 100 foot separation
shall be maintained between water supply wells and any lagoon or any wetted area of a spray field.
Please be advised that any violation of the terms and conditions specified in this COC, the General Permit
or the CAWMP may result in the revocation of this COC, or penalties in accordance with NCGS 143-
215.6A through 143-215.6C, the Clean Water Act and 40 CFR 122AI including civil penalties, criminal
penalties, and injunctive relief.
If you wish _to continue the activity permitted under the General Permit after the expiration date of the
General Permit, an application for renewal must be filed at least 180 days prior to expiration.
This COC is not automatically transferable. A name/ownership change application must be submitted to
the Division prior to a name change or change in ownership.
If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this COC are unacceptable, you have the right to
apply for an individual NPDES Permit by contacting the staff member listed below for information on
this process. Unless such a request is made within 30 days, this CDC shall be final and binding.
This facility is located in a county covered by our Wilmington Regional Office. The Regional Office
Water Quality Staff may be reached at [phone]. If you need additional information concerning
this COC or the General Permit, please contact Sue Homewood at [phone] ext. 502.
Sincerely,
--- - for Alan W. Klimek, P.E.
Enclosures (General Permit NCA200000; Record Keeping and Reporting Package)
cc: (Certificate of Coverage only for all cc's)
Duplin County Health Department
Wilmington Regional Office, Water Quality Section
Duplin County Soil and Water Conservation District
Permit File NCA231274
Permit File AWS310274
NDPU Files

6F WATF Michael F. Easley, Governor
Rp �• William G. Boss Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
j '0 UaWl
Alan W. Klimek, P. E., Director
O
Division of Water Quality
April 9, 2003
Herschel Jenkins
Cypress Creek Farm
692 James Road
Wallace NC 28466
Subject: Certificate of Coverage No. NCA231274
Cypress Creek Farm
Swine Waste Collection, Treatment,
Storage and Application System
.Duplin County
Dear Herschel Jenkins:
On March 14, 2003, the North Carolina Division of Water Quality (Division) issued an NPDES General
Permit for swine facilities. The General Permit was issued to enable swine facilities in North Carolina to
obtain coverage under a single permit that addresses both State and Federal requirements.
In accordance with your application received on January 22, 2003, we are hereby forwarding to you this
Certificate of Coverage (COC) issued to Herschel Jenkins, authorizing the operation of the subject animal
waste collection, treatment, storage and land application system in accordance with NPDES General
Permit NCA200000. The issuance of this COC supercedes and terminates your COC Number
AWS310274 to operate under State Non -Discharge Permit AWG100000.
This approval shall consist of the operation of this system including, but not limited to, the management
of animal waste from the Cypress Creek Farm, located in DuplinCounty, with an animal capacity of no
greater than an annual average of 2640 Feeder to Finish swine and the application to land as specified in
the facility's Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP). If this is a Farrow to Wean or
Farrow to Feeder operation, there may also be one boar for each 15 sows. Where boars are unneccessary,
they may be replaced by an equivalent number of sows. Any of the sows may be replaced by gilts at a
rate of 4 gilts for every 3 sows
The COC shall be effective from the date of issuance until July 1, 2007. Pursuant to this COC, you are
authorized and required to operate the system in conformity with the conditions and limitations as
specified in the General Permit, the facility's CAWMP, and this COC. An adequate system for collecting
and maintaining the required monitoring.. data and operational information must be established for this
facility. Any increase in waste production greater than the certified design capacity or increase in number
of animals authorized by this COC (as provided above) will require a modification to the CAWMP and
this COC and must be completed prior to actual increase in either wastewater flow or number of animals.
Please carefully read this COC and the enclosed General Permit. Since this is a new joint State and
Federal general permit it contains many new requirements in addition to most of the conditions contained
in the current State general permit. Enclosed for your convenience is a package containing the new and
revised forms used for record keeping and reporting. Please pay careful attention to the record keeping
and monitorine conditions in this hermit. The Devices to Automaticallv Ston Irrigation Events Form
must be returned to the Division of Water Quality no later than 120 days following receipt of the
Certificate of Coverage. The Animal Facility Annual Certification Form must be completed and returned
to the Division of Water Qualfty by no later than March 1st of each year.
Non -Discharge Permitting Unit
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
Customer Service Center
An Equal Opportunity Action Employer
Internet httpJ/h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ndpu
Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
Telephone [phone]
50% recycled/10°/6 post -consumer paper

Qe,4\ 2312-14
ti
Nutrient Management Plan For Animal Waste Utilization
This plan has been prepared for:
Cypress Creek Farm31274
Herschel Jenkins
692 James Rd
Wallace, NC 28466
910-285-2403
12-09-2002
This plan has been developed by:
Billy W Houston
Duplin Soil & Water
PO Box 219
A
Kenansville, NC 28349
910-296-2120
Developer Signature
Type of Plan: Nitrogen Only with Manure Only
Owner/Manager/Producer Agreement
I (we) understand and agree to the specifications and the operation and maintenance
procedures established in this nutrient management plan which includes an animal
waste utilization plan for the farm named above. I have read and understand the
Required Specifications concerning animal waste management that are included with
this plan.
qL2r'4& iLCkO-
Signature (owner)
Signature (manager or producer)
� 7
Date
Date
This plan meets the minimum standards and specifications of the U.S. Department of
Agriculture - Natural Resources Conservation Service or the standard of practices
adopted by the Soil and Water Conservation Commission.
Plan Approved By: �✓ a�-
Tecimi Specialist Signature Date
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
404314 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 12-10-2002 Cover Page 1

Nutrients applied in accordance with this plan will be supplied from the y
following source(s):
Commercial Fertilizer is not included in this plan.
S7
Swine Feeder -Finish Lagoon Liquid waste generated 2,447,280 gaWyear by
a 2,640 animal Swine Finishing Lagoon Liquid operation. This production
facility has waste storage capacities of approximately 180 days.
Estimated Pounds of Plant Available Nitrogen Generated per Year
Broadcast
5637
Incorporated
9680
Injected
10661
Irrigated
6127
Actual PAN Applied
(Pounds)
Actual Volume Applied
(Gallons)
Volume Surplus/Deficit
(Gallons)
Year 1
6,351.75
2,537,150
-89,870
f
-----i------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 7----------------------
-
Note: In source ID. S means standard source. U means user defined source.
404314 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 12-10-2002 Source Page 1 of l

Narrative
This WUP is written based on a wetted acres footprint completed by Billy W. Houston of Duplin Soli &
Water.
---------------------------•-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
404314 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed- 12-10-2002 Narrative Page 1 of I

The table shown below provides a summary of the crops or rotations included in this plan for each field.
Realistic Yield estimates are also provided for each crop in the plan. In addition, the Leaching Index for each
field is shown, where available.
Planned Cross Summary
Tract
Field
Lga&ing
Index (LI)
Soil Series
Crop Sequence
RYE
4859
10
N/A
Norfotk
Fescue Pasture
3.5 Tons
4859
11
N/A
Norfialk
Fescue Pasture
3.5 Tons
49591
12
N/A
N.,flk
Fescue Pasture
3.5 Tons
4859
13
NIA
NKlk
Fescue Pasture
3-5 Tons
7455
1
NIA
Autrvville
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tans
Hybrid Bermudagram Hay
5.5 Tons
7455
2
N/A
Autrvville
Small Grain Overseed
I.0 Toms
Hybrid Bermudagram Hay
5.5 Tons
7455
3
N/A
Autrwille
Small Gram Overseed
1.0 Teas
Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay
5.5 Tons
7455
4
NIA
Norfolk
Small Gram Overseed
1 A Tons
Hybrid Bernmdagrass Hay
6.5 Tons
7455
5
NIA
ForeADn
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
Hybrid Bemmdagrass Pasture
6.0 Tons
7455
6
NIA
Foresson
Small Gram Overseed
1.0 Tors
Hybrid Bamudagram Pasture
6.0 Tons
7455
7
N/A
Norfolk
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
Hybrid Bemrudagrass Pasture
6.5 Tons
7455
8
N/A
N.,ffilk
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
Hybrid Bermudagrass Pasture
6.5 Tons
7455
9
NIA
Norfblk
Small Grain Overseed
i 1.0 Tons
Hybrid Bermudagrass Pasture
1 6.5 Tons
LI
Potential Leaching
Technical Guidance
Low potential to contribute to
None
2
soluble nutrient leaching below the
root zone.
> = 2 &
Moderate potential to contribute to
Nutrient Management (590) should be planned.
= 10
soluble nutrient leaching below the
root zone.
High potential to contribute to
NutrientManageement (590) should be planned. Other conservation practices that
soluble nutrient leaching below the
improve the soils available water holding rapacity and improve nutrient use efficiency
> 10
of zone.
should be considered. Examples are Cover Crops (340) to scavenge nutrients,
Sod -Based Rotations (328), Long -Term No-T91(778), and edge -of -field practices such
las Filter Strips (393) and Riparian Forest Buffers (391).
- - --- - - - - ---- -- -- - --
404314 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 12-10-2002 PCS Page 1 of 1
NOTE: Svrnbol * means user entered data.

The Waste Utilization table shown below summarizes the waste utilization plan for this operation. This plan provides an estimate of the number of acres of
cropland needed to use the nutrients being produced. The plan requires consideration of the realistic yields of the crops to he grown, their nutrient
requirements, and proper timing of applications to maximize nutrient uptake.
This table provides an estimate of the amount of nitrogen required by the crop being grown and an estimate of the nitrogen amount being supplied by
manure or other by-products, commercial fertilizer and residual from previous crops. An estimate of the quantity of solid and liquid waste that will be
applied on each field in order to supply the indicated quantity of nitrogen from each source is also included. A balance of the total manure produced and the
total manure applied is included in the table to ensure that the plan adequately provides for the utilization of the manure generated by the operation.
Depending on the requirements of the crop and the nutrient content of the waste, some nutrients will likely be over or under applied if animal waste is being
utilized. Waste should be analyzed before each application cycle and annual soil tests are required if animal waste is being applied. Soil tests should be
used. to balance the nutrient application amounts with the realistic yields oft he crop to be grown. Nutrient management plans may require that the
application of animal waste be limited so as to prevent over application of phosphorous when excessive levels of this nutrient are detected in a field.
Tract
Field
Source
LD,
Soil Series
Total
Acre
Use,
Acres
Crop
RYE
Applic.
I Period
Nitroxen
PA
Nutrient
Req'd
Comm.
Fert.
Nutrient
Applied
Res.
(lbs/A)
Applic.
Method
Manure
PA
Nutrient
Applied
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Solid
Manure
,applied
(acre)
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
N
N
N
!bs/A
1000
l/A
tong
1000 RaIS
tote
-4859
10
S7
Ncrrolk
1.84
1,84
Fescue Pasture
3.5 Tons
811-7/31
*130
0
0
Irriz
130
5 L93
0
95.55
0.00
--4859
11
S7
Norfolk
1,94
1,94
Fescue Pasture
3.5 Tons
8/1-7/31
$130
0
0
brig,
130
51.93
0
100.74
0.00
•-4859
12
S7
Norfolk
2.65
2.65
Fescue Pasture
3.5 Tons
8/1-7/31
*130
0
01
Imp,
130
51.93
0
137.61
0.00
-49591
13
S7
Norfolk
1.55
1.55
Fescue Pasture
3.5 Tons
9/1-7/31
*130
0
0
Irrip,
130
51.93
0
80.49
0.00
7453
1
S7
Autryville
1,42
1.42
Small Grain Overseed
I.0 Tons
10/1-3131
50
0
0
Imp,
50
19.97
0
28.36
0.00
7455
1
S7
Autryville
1,42
1.42
Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay
5.5 Tons
*3/1-10/31
*275
0
0
Imp,.
275
109,83
0
155.98
0.00
7455
2
S7
Autryville
1,26
1.26
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
10/1-3/31
50
0
0
Imp,.
50
19.97
0
25.17
0.00
7455
2
S7
Autryville
1.26
1.26
Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay
5.5 Tons
*311-10/31
*275
0
0
brill.
275
109.85
0
138.41
0.00
7453
3
S7
Autryville
1.29
1.24
Stnall Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
10/1-3/31
50
0
0
Irrip,
50
19.97
0
25.76
0.00
7455
3
57
Autryville
1.24
1,29
Hybrid Betrnudagras9 Hay
5.5 Tons
*3/1-10131
*273
0
0
Irrig
2751
109.85,
D
141.70
D.00
-------------------- -------------------.-------_.. _. .. .. -. ----
404314 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed, 12/10/02 WIT Page 1

Trail
Field
Source
I.D.
Soil Series
Total
Acts
Use.
Acres
Crop
RYF
Applic.
Period
Nitrokm
PA
Nutrient
Req'd
Comm.
Fert.
Nutrient
Applied
Res,
(Ibs/A)
Applic.
Method
Manure
PA
Nutrient
Applied
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(arc)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
N
N
N
Ibs/A
1000
l/A
tens
1000018
tons
7455
4
87
1 Norfolk
1.65
1.65
Small Gram Overseed
1.0 Tons
10/1-3131
50
0
0
hyiK
50
19.97
0
32.95
0.00
7455
4
S7
Norfolk
1.65
1.65
hybrid Bermudagrass Hay
6.5 Tons
4311-10131
4325
0
0
IrriR,
325
129.82
0
214.20
0.00
7455
S
S7
Foreston
3.341
3.34
1 Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
10/1-3/31
50
0
0
Irrix
50
19.97
01
66,71
0.00
7455
5
S7
Foreston
3.34
3.34
Hybrid liermudegrass Pasture
6.0 Tons
43/1-10/31
*225
0
0
Ir x
225
89.87
0
306.18
0.00
7455
6
S7
Foredon
3.27
3,27
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
10/1-3131
50
0
0
IrriR,
50
19.97
0
63.31
0.00
7453
6
S7
Foreston
3.27
3.27
Hybrid Bermudag-ass Pasture
CO Tons
4311-10/31
0225
0
0
Inig.
225
89.87
0
293.89
0,00
7455
7
S7
Norfolk
2.43
2.43
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tana
10/1-3/31
501
0
01
Irrix
50
19.97
0
48.33
0,00
74551
7
S7
Norfolk
2.43
2.43
hybrid Bermudagmss Pasture
6.5 Tons
43/1-10131
4244
0
0
Imp,
244
97.46
0
236.84
0.00
7455
8
S7
Norfolk
1.69
1.69
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
10/t-3/31
50
0
0
Irrix
50
19.97
0
33.75
0.00
7455
8
S7
Norfolk
1.69
1.69
Hybrid Bermudagrass Pasture
6.5 Tons
03/1.1051
*244
0
0
IrriR
244
97.46
0
164.71
0.00
7455
9
S7
Norfolk
1.28
1.28
Small Grain Overseed
1.0'rons
10/1-3/31
Sp
0
0
Irri&
50
19.97
0
25.56
0.00
7455
9
S7
Norfolk
I.28
1.28
Hybrid Be mudagrass Pasture
6.5 Tons
4311-10/31
0244
0
0
Inrip
244
97.4,6
0
124.75
0.00
Total Applied, 1000 pllana
2,537.15
Lagoon Liquids
Total Produced, 1000 gallarw
2,447.2
Balance, I000 gallons
-0.87
Total Applied, tare
-,0.00
Manure Solids
Total Proda,04 ne
0.00
Balance, tans
0.00
Notes: 1. In the tract column, symbol -means leased, otherwise, owned.
2. Symbol' means user entered data.
--- --- ---- -------- --- •-- --- ----- --- ---- ---- -------- -----.....
404314 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 12/10/02 WUT Page 2
ti. K 4. "-�• 1s•��i -
s.

4
The irrigation Application Factors for each field in this plan are shown in the following table.
Infiltration rate varies with soils. If applying waste nutrients through an irrigation system, you must
apply at a rate that will not result in runoff. This table provides the maximum application rate per hour
that may be applied to each field selected to receive wastewater. It also lists the maximum application
amount that each field may receive in any one application event.
Irrigation Application Factors
Tract
Field
Soil Series
Application Rate
(inches/hour)
Application Amount
(inches)
4859
l0
Norfolk
0.50
0.96
4859
11
Norfolk
0.50
0.96
4859
12
Norfolk
0.50
0'%
4859
113
Norfallc
0.50
0.96
7455
1
Autryville
0.60
0.72
7455
2
Autryville
0.60
0.72
7455
3
Autryvipe
0.60
0-72
7455
4
Norfolk
0.50
0.96
7455
15
Foreston
0.50
0.96
7455
16
Foreston
0.50
0.96
7455
7
Norfolk
0.50
0.96
7455
8
Norfolk
0.50
0.96
7455
9
Norfolk
0.50
0.96
-------- ------ ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
404314 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 12-10-2002 IAF Page 1 of 1

The following Lagoon Sludge N itrogen Utilization table provides an estimate of the number of acres needed for
sludge utilization for the indicated accumulation period. These estimates are based on average nitrogen
concentrations for each source, the number of animals in the facility and the plant available nitrogen application
rates shown in the second column.
Lagoon sludge contains nutrients and organic matter remaining after treatment and application of the effluent. At
clean out, this material must be utilized for crop production and applied at agronomic rates. In most cases, the
priority nutrient is nitrogen but other nutrients including phosphorous, copper and zinc can also be limiting.
Since nutrient levels are generally very high, application of sludge must be carefully applied -
Sites must first be evaluated for their suitability for sludge application. Ideally, effluent spray fields should not
be used for sludge application. If this is not possible, care should be taken not to load effluent application fields
with high amounts of copper and zinc so that additional effluent cannot be applied. On sites vulnerable to surface
water moving to streams and lakes, phosphorous is a concern. Soils containing very high phosphorous levels
may also be a concern.
Lagoon Sludge Nitrogen Utilization Table
Crop
Maximum
PAN Rate
lb/ac
Maximum Sludge
Application Rate
1000 gal/ac
Minimum Acres
5 Years Accumulation
Minimum Acres
10 Years Accumulation
Minimum Acres
15 Years Accumulation
Swine Feeder -Finish lagoon Sludge - Standard
Corn 120 bu
150
13.16
33,10
66,19
99.29
Hay 6 too R-Y.E.
300
26.32
16.55
33.10
49.64
Soybean 40 bu -
160
14.04
31.03
62.06
93.08
----------------------•---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----g-------------
404314 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 12-10-2002 Sludge Page 1 of 1

The Available Waste Storage Capacity table provides an estimate of the number of days of storage
capacity available at the end of each month of the plan. Available storage capacity is calculated as the
design storage capacity in days minus the number of days of net storage volume accumulated. The
start date is a value entered by the user and is defined as the date prior to applying nutrients to the first
crop in the plan at which storage volume in the lagoon or holding pond is equal to zero.
Available storage capacity should be greater than or equal to zero and less than or equal to the design
storage capacity of the facility. if the available storage capacity is greater than the design storage
capacity, this indicates that the plan calls for the application of nutrients that have not yet accumulated.
If available storage capacity is negative, the estimated volume of accumulated waste exceeds the
design storage volume of the structure. Either of these situations indicates that the planned application
interval in the waste utilization plan is inconsistent with the structure's temporary storage capacity.
Source Name
ne Feeder -Finish oon Li uid
Deli Star -age a Capacity s
Start Date
E10110
180
Plan Year
Month
Available Storage Capacity (Days)
1
1
154
1
2
141
1
3
162
1
4
175
1
5
18fl
1
6
180
1
7
180
1
8
180
1
9
180
1
10
164
1
11
149
1
12
135
* Available Storage Capacity is calculated as of the end of each month.
-------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------
404314 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 12-10-2002 Capacity Page 1 of 1

Requi red Specifications For Animal Waste Management
1. Animal waste shall not reach surface waters of the state by runoff, drift,
manmade conveyances, direct application, or direct discharge during
operation or land application. Any discharge of waste that reaches
surface water is prohibited.
2. There must be documentation in the design folder that the producer
either owns or has an agreement for use of adequate land on which to
properly apply the waste. If the producer does not own adequate land to
properly dispose of the waste, he/she shall provide evidence of an
agreement with a landowner, who is within a reasonable proximity,
allowing him/her the use of the land for waste application. It is the
responsibility of the owner of the waste production facility to secure an
update of the Nutrient Management Plan when there is a change in the
operation, increase in the number of animals, method of application,
receiving crop type, or available land.
3. Animal waste shall be applied to meet, but not exceed, the nitrogen needs
for realistic crop yields based upon soil type, available moisture,
historical data, climatic conditions, and level of management, unless
there are regulations that restrict the rate of applications for other
nutrients.
4. Animal waste shall be applied to land eroding less than 5 tons per acre
per year. Waste may be applied to land eroding at more than 5 tons per
acre per year but less than 10 tons per acre per year provided grass filter
strips are installed where runoff leaves the field (see USDA, NRCS Field
Office Technical Guide Standard 393 - Filter Strips).
5. Odors can_ be reduced by injecting the waste or by disking after waste
application. Waste should not be applied when there is danger of drift
from the land application field.
6. When animal waste is to be applied on acres subject to flooding, waste
will be soil incorporated on conventionally tilled cropland. When waste is
applied to conservation tilled crops or grassland, the waste may be
broadcast provided the application does not occur during a season prone
to flooding (see "Weather and Climate in North Carolina" for
guidance).
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
404314 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 12/10/02 Specification Pape 1

7. Liquid waste shall be applied at rates not to exceed the soil infiltration
rate such that runoff does not occur offsite or to surface waters and in a
method which does not cause drift from the site during application. No
ponding should occur in order to control odor and flies.
8. Animal waste shall not be applied to saturated soils, during rainfall
events, or when the soil surface is frozen.
9. Animal waste shall be applied on actively growing crops in such a
manner that the crop is not covered with waste to a depth that would
inhibit growth. The potential for salt damage from animal waste should
also be considered.
10. Nutrients from waste shall not be applied in fall or winter for spring
planted crops on soils with a high potential for leaching. Waste/nutrient
loading rates on these soils should be held to a minimum and a suitable
winter cover crop planted to take up released nutrients. Waste shall not
be applied more than 30 days prior to planting of the crop or forages
breaking dormancy.
11. Any new swine facility sited on or after October 1,1995 shall comply
with the following: The outer perimeter of the land area onto which
waste is applied from a lagoon that is a component of a swine farm shall
be at least 50 feet from any residential property boundary and canal.
Animal waste, other than swine waste from facilities sited on or after
October 1, 1995, shall not be applied closer that 25 feet to perennial
waters.
12. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 100 feet to wells.
13. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 200 feet of dwellings other
than those owned by the landowner.
14. Waste shall be applied in a manner not to reach other property and
public right-of-ways.
------------------------------------------------------ -------------------------------------------------------------------
404314 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 12/10/02 Specification Page 2

15. Animal waste shall not be discharged into surface waters, drainageways,
or wetlands by a discharge or by over -spraying. Animal waste may be
applied to prior converted cropland provided the fields have been
approved as a land application site by a "technical specialist". Animal
waste shall not be applied on grassed waterways that discharge directly
into water courses, and on other grassed waterways, waste shall be
applied at agronomic rates in a manner that causes no runoff or drift
from the site.
16. Domestic and industrial waste from washdown facilities, showers, toilets,
sinks, etc., shall not be discharged into the animal waste management
system.
17. A protective cover of appropriate vegetation will be established on all
disturbed areas (lagoon embankments, berms, pipe runs, etc.). Areas
shall be fenced, as necessary, to protect the vegetation. Vegetation such
as trees, shrubs, and other woody species, etc., are limited to areas where
considered appropriate. Lagoon areas should be kept mowed and
accessible. Berms and structures should be inspected regularly for
evidence of erosion, leakage, or discharge.
18. If animal production at the facility is to be suspended or terminated, the
owner is responsible for obtaining and implementing a "closure plan"
which will eliminate the possibility of an illegal discharge, pollution, and
erosion.
19. Waste handling structures, piping, pumps, reels, etc., should be
inspected on a regular basis to prevent breakdowns, leaks, and spills. A
regular maintenance checklist should be kept on site.
20. Animal waste can be used in a rotation that includes vegetables and
other crops for direct human consumption. However, if animal waste is
used on crops for direct human consumption, it should only be applied
pre -plant with no further applications of animal waste during the crop
season.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- ---------------------
404314 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 12/10/02 Specification Page 3

21. Highly visible markers shall be installed to mark the top and bottom
elevations of the temporary storage (pumping volume) of all waste
treatment lagoons. Pumping shall be managed to maintain the liquid
level between the markers. A marker will be required to mark the
maximum storage volume for waste storage ponds.
22. Waste shall be tested within 60 days of utilization and soil shall be tested
at least annually at crop sites where waste products are applied.
Nitrogen shall be the rate -determining nutrient, unless other restrictions
require waste to be applied based on other nutrients, resulting in a lower
application rate than a nitrogen based rate. Zinc and copper levels in
the soils shall be monitored and alternative crop sites shall be used when
these metals approach excessive levels. pH shall be adjusted and
maintained for optimum crop production. Soil and waste analysis
records shall be kept for a minimum of five years. Poultry dry waste
application records shall be maintained for a minimum of three years.
Waste application records for all other waste shall be maintained for five
(5) years.
23. Dead animals will be disposed of in a manner that meets North Carolina
regulations.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
404314 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 12/10102 Specification Page 4

Crop Notes
The following crop note applies to field(s): 4
Bermudagrass Coastal Plain, Mineral Soil, Moderately Well Drained.
Adaptation: Well -adapted.
In the Coastal Plain, hybrid bermudagrass sprigs can be planted Mar. 1 to Mar. 31. Cover sprigs 1" to 3"
deep (1.5" optimal). Sprigs should be planted quickly after digging and not allowed to dry in sun and wind.
For Coastal and Tifton 78 plant at least 10 bu/ac in 3' rows, spaced 2' to 3' in the row. Generally a rate of
30 bu/ac is satisfactory to produce full groundcover in one or two years under good growing conditions.
Tifton 44 spreads slowly, so use at least 40 bu/ac in 1.5' to 2' rows spaced 1' to 1.5' in row. For
broadcast/disked-in sprigs use about 60 bu/ac. Soil test for the amounts of lime, phosphorus, potassium
and micronutrients to apply preplant and for annual maintenance. Apply 60 to 100 lb/ac N in the
establishment year in split applications in April and July. For established stands apply 180 to 240 lb/ac N
annually in split applications, usually in April and following the first and second hay cuts. Reduce N rates
by 25% for grazing. Refer to NCSU Technical Bulletin 305 Production and Utilization of Pastures and
Forages in North Carolina for more information or consult your regional agronomist or extension agent for
assistance.
The following crop note applies to field(s): 1, 2, 3
Bermudagrass Coastal Plain, Mineral Soil, Moderately Well Drained.
Adaptation: Well -adapted.
In the Coastal Plain, hybrid bermudagrass sprigs can be planted Mar. I to Mar. 31. Cover sprigs 1" to 3"
deep (1.5" optimal). Sprigs should be planted quickly after digging and not allowed to dry in sun and wind.
For Coastal and Tifton 78 plant at least 10 bu/ac in 3' rows, spaced 2' to 3' in the row. Generally a rate of
30 bu/ac is satisfactory to produce full groundcover in one or two years under good growing conditions.
Tifton 44 spreads slowly, so use at least 40 bu/ac in 1.5' to 2' rows spaced 1' to 1.5' in row. For
broadcast/disked-in sprigs use about 60 bu/ac. Soil test for the amounts of lime, phosphorus, potassium
and micronutrients to apply preplant and for annual maintenance. Apply 60 to 100 lb/ac N in the
establishment year in split applications in April and July. For established stands apply 180 to 240 lb/ac N
annually in split applications, usually in April and following the first and second hay cuts. Reduce N rates
by 25% for grazing. Refer to NCSU Technical Bulletin 305 Production and Utilization of Pastures and
Forages in North Carolina for more information or consult your regional agronomist or extension agent for
assistance.
------------•-------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------
404314 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 12-10-2002 Crop Note Page 1 of 4

The following crop note applies to field(s): 10, 11, 12, 13
Fescue: Coastal Plain, Mineral Soil, Moderately Well Drained
Adaptation: Marginal.
In the Coastal Plain, tall fescue can be planted Sept I to Oct. 15 (best) and Feb. 15 to Mar. 20. For
pure -stand broadcast seedings use 20 to 30 lb/ac., for drilled use 15 to 20 lb/ac. seed. Use certified seed to
avoid introducing weeds or annual ryegrass. Plant seed 0.25" to 0.5" deep for pure stands, 0.25" in mixture
with clovers. Tall fescue requires adequate soil moisture for persistence and production. Soil test for
preplant and maintenance lime, phosphorus, and potassium recommendations. Apply 40 to 60 lb/ac
nitrogen at planting for pure stands only. Do not apply N for mixtures with clovers but use proper legume
inoculation techniques. Apply 150 to 200 lb/ac. N to pure -stand fescue for hay production; reduce N rates
by 25% for grazing. Apply N Feb. 1 to Mar. 20 and Aug. 20 to Sept. 30, with equal amounts in each
window. Refer to NCSU Technical Bulletin 305 Production and Utilization of Pastures and Forages in
North Carolina for additional information or consult your regional agronomist or extension agent for
assistance.
The following crop note applies to field(s): 5, 6
Small Grain: CP, Mineral Soil, low -leachable
In the Coastal Plain, oats and barley should be planted from October 15-October 30; and rye from October
15-November 20. For barley, plant 22 seed/drill row foot and increase the seeding rate by 5% for each
week seeding is delayed beyond the optimum time. See the seeding rates table for applicable seeding rate
modifications in the current NCSU "Small Grain Production Guide". Also, increase the initial seeding rate
by at least 10% when planting no -till. Oats should be planted at 2 bushels/acre and rye at 1-1 1 /2
bushelslacre. PIant all these small grains at 1-1 1/2" deep. Adequate depth control is essential. Review the
NCSU Official Variety "green book" and information from private companies to select a high yielding
variety with the characteristics needed for your area and conditions. Apply no more than 30 lbs/acre N at
planting. Phosphorus and potash recommended by a soil test can also be applied at this time. The
remaining N should be applied during the months of February -March.
The following crop note applies to field(s): 4, 7, 8, 9
Small Grain: CP, Mineral Soil, medium leachable
In the Coastal Plain,. oats and barley should be planted from October 15-October 30; and rye from October
15-November 20. For barley, plant 22 seed/drill row foot and increase the seeding rate by 5% for each
week seeding is delayed beyond the optimum time. See the seeding rates table for applicable seeding rate
modifications in the current NCSU "Small Grain Production Guide". Also, increase the initial seeding rate
by at least 10% when planting no -till. Oats should be planted at 2 bushelslacre and rye at 1-1 1/2
bushelslacre. Plant all these small grains at 1-1 1 /2" deep. Adequate depth control is essential. Review the
NCSU Official Variety "green book" and information from private companies to select a high yielding
variety with the characteristics needed for your area and conditions. Apply no more than 30 lbslacre N at
planting. Phosphorus and potash recommended by a soil test can also be applied at this time. The
remaining N should be applied during the months of February -March.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
4at3 1; Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 12-10-2002 Crop Note Page 2 of 4

The following crop note applies to field(s): 1, 2, 3
Small Grain: CP, Mineral Soil, medium leachable
In the Coastal Plain, oats and barley should be planted from October 15-October 30; and rye from October
15-November 20. For barley, plant 22 seed/drill row foot and increase the seeding rate by 5% for each
week seeding is delayed beyond the optimum time. See the seeding rates table for applicable seeding rate
modifications in the current NCSU "Small Grain Production Guide". Also, increase the initial seeding rate
by at least 10% when planting no -till. Oats should be planted at 2 bushels/acre and rye at 1-1 1/2
bushels/acre. Plant all these small grains at 1-1 112" deep. Adequate depth control is essential. Review the
NCSU Official Variety "green book" and information from private companies to select a high yielding
variety with the characteristics needed for your area and conditions. Apply no more than 30 lbs/acre N at
planting. Phosphorus and potash recommended by a soil test can also be applied at this time. The
remaining N should be applied during the months of February -March.
The following crop note applies to field(s): 5, 6
Bermudagrass CP, Mineral Soil, Poorly Drained to Somewhat Poorly Drained.
Adaptation: Effective artificial drainage MUST be in place to achieve Realistic Yield Expectations
provided for these soils.
In the Coastal Plain, hybrid bermudagrass sprigs can be planted Mar. I to Mar. 31. Cover sprigs 1" to 3"
deep (1.5" optimal). Sprigs should be planted quickly after digging and not allowed to dry in sun and wind.
For Coastal and Tifton 78 plant at least 10 bu/ac in 3' rows, spaced 2' to 3' in the row. Generally a rate of
30 bu/ac is satisfactory to produce full groundcover in one or two years under good growing conditions.
Tifton 44 spreads slowly, so use at least 40 bu/ac in 1.5' to 2' rows spaced 1' to 1.5' in row. For
broadcast/disked-in sprigs use about 60 bu/ac. Soil test for the amounts of lime, phosphorus, potassium
and micronutrients to apply preplant and for annual maintenance. Apply 60 to 100 lb/ac N in the
establishment year in split applications in April and July. For established stands apply 180 to 240 lb/ac N
annually in split applications, usually in April and following the first and second hay cuts. Reduce N rates
by 25% for grazing. Refer to NCSU Technical Bulletin 305 Production and Utilization of Pastures and
Forages in North Carolina for more information or consult your regional agronomist or extension agent for
assistance.
------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------
404314 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 12-10-2002 Crop Note Page 3 of 4

The following crop note applies to field(s): 7, 8, 9
Bermudagrass: CP, Mineral Soil, Moderately Well Drained.
Adaptation: Well -adapted.
In the Coastal Plain, hybrid bermudagrass sprigs can be planted Mar. I to Mar. 31. Cover sprigs I" to 3"
deep (1.5" optimal). Sprigs should be planted quickly after digging and not allowed to dry in sun and wind.
For Coastal and Tifton 78 plant at least 10 bu/ac in 3' rows, spaced 2' to 3' in the row. Generally a rate of
30 bu/ac is satisfactory to produce full groundcover in one or two years under good growing conditions.
Tifton 44 spreads slowly, so use at least 40 bu/ac in 1.5' to 2' rows spaced 1' to 1.5' in row. For
broadcast/disked-in sprigs use about 60 bu/ac. Soil test for the amounts of lime, phosphorus, potassium
and micronutrients to apply preplant and for annual maintenance. Apply 60 to 100 lb/ac N in the
establishment year in split applications in April and July. For established stands apply 180 to 240 lb/ac N
annually in split applications, usually in April and following the first and second hay cuts. Reduce N rates
by 25% for grazing. Refer to NCSU Technical Bulletin 305 Production and Utilization of Pastures and
Forages in North Carolina for more information or consult your regional agronomist or extension agent for
assistance.
-------------------------------------------------------------- - --------------------------
404314 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 12-10-2002 Crop Note Page 4 of 4

WETTABLE ACRES
IRRIGATION SYSTEM DESIGN PARMATERS
and
COMPUTATIONAL WORKSHEET SUMMARY
Landowner/ Operator Name Herschel Jenkins
Adress 692 James Rd.
Wallace, NC 28466
Telephone [phone]
TABLE 1 - Field Specifications
COUNTY Duplin
DATE 12.15JQ2
Tract
Number
Hydrant
or
field (1)
Number
acres
start end
wetted
area
acres
middle
wetted
area
acres
stop and
wetted
area
Apprmdmate
Ma)dmun
Usaable Size
of field (2)
(acres) Table
column
length
of
pulls
in feet
Width
of
pulls
in feet
Soil Type
Slope
(%)
Crop(s)
Maxdmun
Application
Rabe (3)
(iNhr)
Mamdumn
Application
per Irrigation
cycle (3)
(Inches)
7455
pi
0.26
1.16
0
1.42 EE90
B-C
325
156
AUB
0.5
Bermuda
0.5
1
7455
p2
0.26
1
0
1.26 EE90
B-C
280
156
AUB
0.5
Bermuda
0.5
1
7455
p3
0.26
.391.64
0
1.29 EE90
B-C
222/179
76.51156
AUB
0-5
Bermuda
0.5
1
7455
p4
0.26
1.39
0
1.65 EE90
B-C
387
156
NOB
0-5
Bermuda
0.5
1
7455
p5
0.26
3.08
0
3.34 EE90
B-C
860
156
FOA
0.5
Bermuda
0.5
1
7455
p6
0.25
3.02
0
3.27 E190
B-C
860
153
FOA
0-5
Bermuda
0.5
1
7455
p7
0.25
2.18
0
2.43 E190
B-C
620
153
NOB
0.5
Bermuda
0.5
1
7455
p8
0.25
1.44
0
1.69 E190
B-C
410
153
NOB
0-5
Bermuda
0.5
1
7455
p9
0.26
1.02
0
1.28 EE90
B-C
285
156
NOB
0-5
Bermuda
0.5
1
1 see attached map.
2 Total field acreage minus required buffer areas.
3 Refer to N,C. Irrigation guide, Field Office Technical Guide, Section II G. Annual application must not exceed the agronomic rates for the soil and crop used.
Wettable Acre Computational Worksheet Completed by: I Billy Houston Date 12J5.102

WETTABLE ACRES
IRRIGATION SYSTEM DESIGN PARMATERS
and
COMPUTATIONAL WORKSHEET SUMMARY
Landowner / Operator Name Herschel Jenkins
Adress 692 James Rd.
Wallace, NC 28466
Telephone [phone]
TABLE 1 - Field Specifications
DATE
Duplin
12./5./02
Tract
Number
Hydrant
or
field (1)
Number
acres
start end
wetted
area
acres
middle
wetted
area
acres
stop end
wetted
area
Approximate
Ma)dmun
Useable Size
of field (2) -
(acres) Table
column
Length
of
pulls
in feet
Width
of
pulls
in feet
Sall Type
Slope
(%)
Crop(s)
Ma*nun
Application
Rate (3)
(In/hr)
Mwdumn
Application
per Irrigation
cycle (3)
(Inches)
4859
p10
0.26
1.58
0
1.84 EE90
B-C
440
156
NOB
0-5
Fescue
0.5
1
4859
p11
0.25
1.69
0
1.94 E190
B-C
480
153
NOB
0-5
Fescue
0.5
1
4859
p12
0.17
1.51/.97
0
2.65 EE90
B-C
430/352
153/120
NOB
0-5
Fescue
0.5
1
4859
p13
0.25
1.3
0
1.55 EE80
B-C
370
153
NOS
0-5
Fescue
0.5
1
1 see attached map.
Ii
2 Total field acreage minus required buffer areas.
3 Refer to N.C. Irrigation guide, Field Office Technical Guide, Section II G. Annual application must not exceed the agronomic rates for the sail and crop used.
Wettable Acre Computational Worksheet Completed by: tBELHouston Date 112./5./02 1

,�m ti i F • - '"�:ti, }- ..,y�. �.e:;��YY,r,+ .' ' a �.l ri'� 't 1 � -
'\„
lw
A
- . i � ` ' ,, ,./• rr yr; - v ' �4�•', �• �1 '`Y.�7.ti.
, � � ' � V +•' ;? ors r � �i' ? - '"',,
I ' yyL{ � �, Si Y • 1 �� ! V, r �, 1�••• 1
'i ^ �� F , • , fy��V'•�.T�FfI Fi1� ��„ `� �l•,r \ 'j1' l
1 � 'L.11 �• 4 :9
1'r S �� � �•» j G.
411• + � i5'h p+ • N
-!�,•. •e�. , y `, , , .t � -':Tip M •- r -• '7 t 4 ''n'•I '�: �'�.�.
. � ` :� � r ' - ''��. _'fir n�k`y1• `' �.
'g +• .'' SI. ,�: �,. ; ski \ 'h
, �,' R � • . , ` a4��1� r,r+ '� ,� Sy�f;Ya` 'r'^ry �,�µµ,,� a{1 r '{,- " .� s. •�-. ; .. '� i � , h
_ ., � t-f�� - `Jt .l. _'�: - .�.:�a�. Si, _ keJN,ry,y •, u?+r!�--�� i r f. r-.. C.,',., ,,�•J

NOV--25-02 04:0$"�Pq BILLYS ,iF2RIGATIOH 91�2H39 _ 1'++ %'�.
N
%..
TAPERIRING NOZZLE PERFORMANCE - U.S. UNITS
NELSON BIG GUNS
Flow rats in GPM, Diameter in feet �-
P. a
TA-2^#
100 SERIES BIG GUN - 2,0 TRAJECTORY - TAPEFVRINQ NOZZLE _
�
N=14
Nmle
Noate
Naz t*
Nc:de
Noz>fs
NG&
N*OWDle
Nm=
18rrm
1 T ffm
18mm
119m
20mm
21 err++
221Yi1
23mm
24111m
PS-1
GPM DIA
GPM DIA.
GPM DIA_
GPM DIA
GPM D1A
GPM o1A.
GPM DIA.
GPM VA.
GM Mk
-�
87 212
....:'
7+, ?14
` .. -f1'
84 225
47 . ' 240
11D 2�2
123 256
1'�1 keg
186 . 275
9a 233
110' 250
125
e6
83 239
94 246
105 254
:A14 268
120 2EA
130 217•
135 273
�� 286'-1�0
153 281
1e7 266
186 294
2W 30
80
95 259
IC8 269
122 278
139 288
156 297
176 3CvS
193 313
214 324
MS 3`3%
_�:
.t07:..:isSs!68 .
t15 ':,278...'
f30 :?J
147 200
166 309:
-10. ;r�317 •�
?0(..:::::.;.#24 `
'P27" � 334:.:'xa
100
107 273
121
137 2W
1'55 WS
175 318
197 327
216 334
240 344
282 US
'2S1": ';1�3:
._
z2rx C log- GPI" I9a..' w`#v( O1 i
150 SERIES BIG GUN_ - 2�f TRAJECTORY - TAP_ERIRING NOZZLE__
NC"* Nozzio Nozzle NUrsle � Nome Neale NoZ"
22mm 24rrm 2Brer11 28rnm mmrn 32nm 344"
P61. GPM DIA. GPM_ D'A. GFW DIA. GPM DIA GPM DIA. GPM M. GPM 01A !
— �sa._. 135 270 184 283 196 302 233 318 274 3m 319 347 1 3139 3m
214 :W MS 3a4 _ 3g1: • : > = . , ' 405 . 3i4 ;
70 158 _ me 194 315 231 331, 276 349 325 _ 365 378 ^� 382 437 3k
.:. ou 207.:::.. 330 247' NO '295 • 3e4.; . ::3Aj:...::'; :':3 Y :'. �0 :..:='.,347.:.. 4 7 ':..;--4m'' '
40 18i 92+D 226 34a 2W 357 313 377 366 X6 4N 4t1 495 424
,251 35J 277 me am :. 388 3e6 : .:' .•� `' :_.452
110 MD 33s 243 3% 290 370 346 397 407 41e 474 433 SQ 446
170 :.208 _ _= r :8!49 - : 253 389 303 388 36 t 407 425... = 42b 49S 44$ :.67:? i57 .;
the above distance of throw data re6 been calculated based on a We!, cornparatNe test and data from the Nelson SR
Serles Sig Gun Camlog. in equal corldlllors the distance of throw for the Taper,'RUng nozzle is I % less than tho Wet
Bore nozzle and 2% more then the Rirp nozzle.
Performance data has t_-een obU, ned unoer ideal test conditions and may be adversely affected by wind, poor
hydraulic entrance conditions or other factors. No representation regarding droplet condition, application race or
suifahls+y for a particular application is made herein.
Innovation in irrigation Tm
NbcISON
IRRIGATION CORPORA TiON
R M0 4, OCK 169. AlrW road
Walla Walla. WA 9M-9426 U.S.A.
Phone: (5W 525-75W
FAX M91525-7907
E-MAL: nel,vn>~'neisorirr.crm
WES WI=: www.neMnimcorn

2.
3.
4.
S.
b.
►7
*.9
3e Determination`Procedures
Apprcation Equipment
liard Hose Traveling Gun System
FIELD DATA WORKSHEETS`
lake and model number g G -Act Ln
Hose length �_ [feet] and hose inside diameter (ID) [inch]
Grin male and model number Wyo i
Gun nozzle size [inch], ring orifice, 21 M— taper bore orifice
Gun alc angle _ I s o - [degrees]
Travel lane spacin8 [feet]. Indicate %vil ether unifori or ra^,don?.
Number of exterior h}-drants `umber of interior hydrants
Gun wetted diameter J` D [feet]. ✓ measured or based on gun chart.
Gun pressure 40 [psi] observed at i.•orl<in; ga::ge,
determined from gun charts, calculated calculations)
Op.ra::na pressure at hose reel �20 _ [psi]. ✓' observed a? «o.1::r:s Cauge or
pro,ided b%- oxne..
Suppiti line size [inch] (;corn pump to last hydrant)
Supply line length feet (n;a�i,nUm pu„ ping distance)
Surply line type ^ PVC or aluminum
Pump make and model number &rkell-1 P� `d � � � 1 /Z
*' 14. Pu;-np capacity [gpm]
** 13. En. -Me mare and model number Al aFAtl4O�✓ 6 V C_ 2-1 AGO v✓ 9001. AA �
or
*'16. Electric r.-:otor hozsepower and rp,.-,i [hp] bS- [rpn?;
Note: It is stron&'L�' Iecom^?ended that you field determine .:etted diam Ler anu owera':na,
pressure at the reel and gull.
* Locate each hydrant on a cope of the map. Indicate the start and stop of the sprinkler ca.t
for each travel lane and show the distance tra-eled. Shod the location of the supply -line.
Irrigated acres are determined by the travel lane.
*' Optional data Furnish .here possible.
/;� *•. Information furnished by
S:gr.as::e of owner or facitil}- KI esentat; e Signaw.j9of technical specials:
k;tir B; }i,_ W_ 14°✓1
Printed name of 0: ner or facility repmentatiVe Printed�ie of te&tni.a: spectatisr
DarDate. It
*** Only the person or people collecting the data should sign the Field Data Worksheet. _.
C1
`1
8

•..i$r`la.�xi.-:i;:3�4'.['r ' .r:.T �'� ,:. �.'4'' '�$�, j 'may', 1�a`.-'i trti ri?•� -M W.MM
x �,
(Mildple wwftheeftnW be needed) � •._ . .. _ , ':,- Y ;, a,
i y�'r,••
HARD HOSE Ti ►1/EL EIt � � �= ,
IRRIGATION SYSTEM ;pi, `
H.
• , L • .ie:� i Ci-; +; C:L a; "Si;` •'3��T ?�.iat Y i~;£ £
_ .f'i f'�.k d T G`«
rs�`
Hand Hose Traveling Gun System
xL. }
. Y.Y iM'.a-e�i.' �r SS�iiY u �. TEA �., a. �S•C '�""�%14M'•M�...�.
x=
COMPUTATIONAL` - WORKSHEET
I. Farm number (identification) -.12 LE Field number (identification) 1
2. Irrigation system designation ✓ Existing irrigation system New/expanded Irrigation system
3. Dumber of travel lanes # Interior lanes # Exterior lanes JLr feet] Length of pull(L1)
# Interior lanes 2. # Exterior lanes 1,P'4 [feet] Length of pull(L2)
# Interior lanes _ `� # Exterior lanes jLL0 [feet] Length of pull(L3)
4. Wetted diameter [feet] from Field Data Worksheet
5. Spacing Hydrant spacing (feet] fas a rer=enta ID -of we'-ed diamet:r]
6. Hydrant layout Multiple hydrants Single hydrant � Excessively spaced hydrants
7. head the irrigated area per travel pull for the given wetted diameter from the appropriate table and column
based on pattern, spacing, and travel lane location.
Travel lane length (L, Interior or -J_ Exterior (lane/hydrant)
.lb (a) Acres start end of pull from Table r+:?;? Column 17
] ,1 (b) Acres middle portion of pull (L1)
{Pull lengthjIV (feet] X Wetted width 1 S"`� (feet]1, / 43,560
(c) acres stop end of pull from Table '' Column C
i • 42- Total acres for travel lane length (M) (Sum: a + b + c)
Travel lane length (L, Interior or 2 Fxterior (lane/hydrant)
,1,6 (a) Acres start end of pull from Table F_E 4 � Column r
•00 (b) Acres middle portion of pull (1-2)
{full length_ [feet] X .Wetted width 1;; [feet]) / 43,560
(c) Acres stop end of pull from Table i IColumn C
1,-L6 Total acres for travel lane length (L2) (Sum: a + b + c)
Travel Iane length (L, Interior or Exterior (lane/hydrant)
26 (a) Acres start end of pull from Table r- r qo Column d
-3I (b) .acres middle portion of pull (1-3)
' �' {Pull length 1g [feet] X Wetted width 1 S : [feet]} / 43,560
(c) .-Acres stop end of pull from Table " Column C
) •? � Total acres for travel Iane length (1-3) (Sum: a + b + c)
S. Multiply the tabulated irrigated acreage value per travel pull by the number of pulls of each
category in the field. Add all of these, and this is the total irrigated acreage for the field. ,
I `lam (a) Acres per travel lane length (1-1) X # Lanes = Acres
1,2� (b) Acres per travel lane length (1-2) X # Lanes = Acres
1.2'1 (c) Acres per travel lane length (1-3) X # Lanes = Acres
') Total C.Allw-MP wettable acres for field (Suss: 8a + 8b + 8c)
Wettable Acre Computational VVorlsheet Completed by: �`•1�1 _'!C_''�}. _ _ Date: 11
L
Signature of technical specialist
15J

a..+'Sr>i4.i.• ,i:-,•].«- ..r_:L.�-� f :4- -`'
{y sya*.ti:r
iMulopfaworks►rem be needed)
Y
HARD HOSE TRAVELER ' __
;.• . ,..... - r4 ;
r --,:
IRRIGATIQN$1fSiEM',.:
Had Hose Traveling `System
.Gun
COMPUTATIOIVALWORKSHEET
I. Farm number (identification) Field number (identification)
2. Irrigation system designation Existing irrigation system New/expanded irrigation system
3. Number of travel lanes # Interior lanes # Exterior lanes YJ,9 feet] Length of pull(Ll)
# Interior lanes _,� # Exterior lanes eGr? [feet] Length of pull(L2)
# Interior lanes # Exterior lanes �?60 [feet] Length of pull(B)
4. Wetted diameter [feet] from Field Data Worksheet
5. Spacing Hydrant spacing [feet] [as a percentage of wetted diameter]
6. Hydrant layout Multiple hydrants Single hydrant _ Excessively spaced hydrants
7. Read t''e -.�d area per travel pull for the given wetted diameter from the appropriate table and column
based on pattern, spacing, and travel lane location.
Travel lane length (Lj Interior or `f Exterior (lane/hydrant)
(a) Acres start end of pull from Table E0 ° Column Q
_-301 (b) Acres middle portion of pull (L1)
{Pull Length-M [feet] X Wetted width t3 b [feet]; / 43,560
(c) Acres stop end of pull from Table " Column C
1. b5'Tota1 acres for travel lane length (L1) (Sutra: a + b + c)
Travel lane length (L, Interior or ]Exterior (lane/hvdrant)
s 16 (a) Acres start end of pull from Table EE `l° Column
3•OF- (b) Acres middle portion of pull (L2)
(Pull length 6D [feet] X Wetted width 1.s6 [feet]} / 43,560
(c) Acres stop end of pull from Table '1 Column C_
3,3 4 Total acres for travel lane length (L2) (Sum: a + b + c)
TraveI lane length (Lj 6 Interior or Exterior (lane/hydrant)
(a) Acres start end of pull from Table E11-) Column B
. .vz (b) Acres middle portion of pull (L3)
(Pull length h� [feet] X Wetted width /,5 ] [feet]} / 43,560
(c) Acres stop end of pull from Table 11 Column C-
_a.? D Total acres for travel lane length (L3) (Sum: a + b + c)
8. Multiply the tabulated irrigated acreage value per travel pull by the number of pulls of each
category in the field. Add all of these, and this is the total irrigated acreage for the field.
(a) Acres per travel lane Iength (L1)
,3 (b) Acres per travel lane length (U)
5•^� (c) Acres per travel lane length (0)
X —# Lanes =
Acres
X # Lanes =
Acres
X # Lanes =
Acres
9'16 Total C.X1VNfP wettable acres for field (Sum: 8a + 8b + 8c)
Wettable Acre Computational �Vbrksheet Completed by: G.�i ` ;.��'� Date: 'ter;
Signature of technical specialist
S,

(.Vul'/.'. S`�GCLi':llQr�f[CLuc�s) i. '�•
R` rr:
yr{
Hand Hose �Travelkng A,
ATIONALWORKSHEET
1. Farm number (Identification) Field number (identification)
2. Irrigation system designation Existing irrigation system _____ New/expanded irrigation system
3. Number of travel lanes _ # Interior lanes # Exterior lanes 6La , feet] Length of pull(LI)
# Interior lanes # Exterior lanes a [feet] Length of pull(12)
# Interior lanes �� # Exterior lanes -1.�-r [feet] Length of pull(L3)
4. Wetted diameter [feet] from Field Data Worksheet
S. Spacing Hydrant spacing (feet] [as a percentage of «etted ~���r?
6. Hydrant layout Multiple hydrants _ Single hydrant ` Excessively spaced hydrants
7. Read the it:ion.:d area per travel pull for the given wetted diameter from the appropriate table and column
based on pattem, spacing, and travel lane location.
Travel lane length (L, 9 interior or Exterior (lane/hydrant)
--L?-r(a) Acres start end of pull from Table FI4 Column 6
2, I (b) Acres middle portion of pull (LI)
{Pull length 61 o [feet] X Wetted width 15.E [feet]; / 43,560
(c) Acres stop end of pull from Table 1' Column L
z,`f-3 Total acres for travel lane length (1-1) (Sum: a + b + c)
Travel lane length (L, --L Interior or Exterior (lane/hydrant)
.Zr (a) Acres start end of pull from Table j5Z Column Q
(b) Acres middle portion of pull (1-2)
(Pull length !D [feet] X lVetted width Is [feet]f / -43,560
O (c) Acres stop end of pull from Fable " Column — C
]. 69 Total acres for travel lane length (L2) (Sum: a + b + c)
Travel lane length (L_} Interior or 9 Exterior (lane/hydrant)
14 (a) Acres start end of pull from Table EEa -� Coll.mn
1-0= (b) .acres middle portion of pull (1-3)
[Pull length *r(feet] X Wetted width IJ-4 Ffeet](/ -43,360
(c) Acres stop end of pull from Table I' Column C
I . IS- Total acres for travel lane length (L3) (Sum: a + b + c)
8. Multiply the tabulated irrigated acreage value per travel pull by the number of pulls of each
category in the field. Add all of these, and this is the total irrigated acreage for the field.
.2-1f3 (a) Acres per travel lane length (L1) X # Lanes = Acres
1, &5 (b) Acres per travel lane length (1-2) X tt Lanes = Acres
!• ' P (c) Acres per travel lane length (1-3) X # Lanes = Acres
, , 4 Total CALZVUP wettable acres for field (Sum: 8a + 8b + 8c)
Wettable Acre Computational Vtibrl sheet Completed by: 6A f & Date: 1 ir1v
� Signature of technical specialist
;1SJ.

_W y�^�-...1'atr
�w�Iw4g,AE ..c_�.l r_ '+' Y.ri ut�
`(.sfultlpteii�riksirertt,may be need) T7" }4� t f ga , ' �s 3i; �, _ s FiMD HOSE
y+ IRRIGATION SYTEI1�!"
Yf n rc
• '' f Y'� ' �..:s�
Hard Hose Traiveling Gun :System99.
COMPUTATIONAL WORKSHEET
I. Farm number ('identification) Field number (identification)
2. Irrigation system designation Existing irrigation system New/expanded irrigation system
3. Number of travel lanes # Interior lanes J0 # Exterior lanes _IPID feet] Length of pull(L1)
I # Interior lanes # Exterior lanes `lP, [feet] Length of pull(L2)
IZ, # Interior lanes /2^ # Exterior lanes [feet] Length of pull(U)
4. Wetted diameter J_'L [feet] from Field Data Worksheet
5. Soacina Hydrant spacing a `age OF :-et`eL dia -e`er]
6. Hydrant layout ✓Multiple hydrants Single hydrant Excessively sauced hydra-ts
7. Read the irrigated area per travel pull for the given wetted diameter from the appropriate table and column
based on pattern, spacing, and travel lane Iocation.
Travel lane length (L_) Interior or /o Exterior (Iane/hydrant)
dC (a) Acres start end of pull from Table E—F-40 Column _r
(b) Acres middle portion of pull (LI)
WWI length�140 [feet] X Wetted width /S-Z_ [feet]; / 43,560
(c) acres stop end of pull from Table F_F_ ? ) Column C
1.24 Total acres for travel lane length (M) (Sum: a + b + c)
Travel lane length (L, JL Interior or Exterior (lane/hydrant)
(a) Acres start end of pull from Table Ej T ° Column Q
I.601(b) Acres middle portion of pull (1.2)
{Pull length WO [feet] X -Wetted width lam? (feet]} /43,560
(c) acres stop end of pull from Table Column
]' Total acres for travel lane length (L2) (Sum: a + b + c)
Travel lane length (L, U Interior or /.Z Exterior (lane/hydrant) o. 26X S 5 >>
.1'1 (a) Acres start end of pull from Table EF90 Cot,�mn . (�
1.s l (b) Acres middleportionof pull (13) l s�
{Pull length Iy2 (feet] X wetted width 1zm ffeet]i / 13,560
(c) .acres stop end of pull from Table FC-1} -Column c
2,k5'Tota] acres for travel lane length (L3) (Sum: a + b + c)
S. Multiply the tabulated irrigated acreage value per travel pull by the number of pulls of each
ea,egory in the field. Add all of these, and this is the total irrigated acreage for the field.
I.+ (a) Acres per travel lane length (LI) X ? Lanes = acres
# .? (b) Acres per travel lane length (1-2) X Lanes = Acres
(c) Acres per travel lane length (1-3) X ## Lanes = Acres
6,43 Total C.41W.% P wettable acres for field (Sum: 8a + 8b + 8c)
Wettable Acre Computational Worksheet Completed by: -; 4r _ _ _ Date:
Si;;na.ure of technical specialist
1.

Hard Hose
COMPUTAi
Gun' list
I. Farm number (identification) Field number (identification)
2. Irrigation system designation Existing irrigation system New/expanded irrigation system
3. Dumber of travel lanes # Interior lanes !3 # Exterior lanes 3 7D feet] Length of pull(Ll)
# Interior lanes # Exterior lanes (feet] Length of pull(L2)
# Interior lanes # Exterior lanes [feet] Length of pull(L3)
4. Wetted diameter l 7 0 [feet] from Field Data Worluheet
5. Spacing H:.-!rant svacir - [feet] jas entae o` ed die:,>eter]ar g
6. Hydrant layout ✓Llultipieh}"drants Single hvdrant Excessively spaced hvdra^F,z
Read the irrio.,ccd area per travel pull for the given wetted diameter from the appropriate table and column
based on pattern, spacing, and travel lane location.
Travel lane length (L, Interior or II Exterior (lane/hydrant)
(a) Acres start end of pull from Table CE,Sr o Column l!
1•30 (b) acres middle portion of pull (L1)
{Pull length 3a0 (feet] X Wetted width -b'2- (feetj; / 43,560
o (c) Acres stop end of pull from Table rE t,) Column c
Total acres for travel lane length (LI) (Sum: a + b + c)
Travel lane length (L_ Interior or Exterior (Iane/hydrant)
(a) .acres start end of pull from Table
(b) Acres middle portion of pull (1.2)
{Pull length [feet] X Wetted width
(c) Acres stop end of pull from Table —
Total acres for travel lane length (L2) (Sum: a + b + c)
Travel lane length (L, Interior or Exterior (lane/hydrant)
(a) Acres start end of pull from Table T
(b) .acres middle portion of pull (1-3)
jPull length [feet] X Wetted width
(c) .acres stop end of pull from Table
Total acres for travel lane Iength (L3) (Sum: a + b + c)
Column
. [feet]} / 43,560
Column
Column
]:feet]) / 43,560
Column
S. Multiply the tabulated irrigated acreage value per travel pull by the number of pulls of each
category in the field. Add all of these, and this is the total irrigated acreage for the field.
13? (a) acres per travel lane length (1-1) X Lanes = .acres
(b) Acres per travel lane length (1.2) X n Lanes = Acres
(c) Acres per travel lane length (1-3) X r Lanes = Acres
JIL Total C43WUP wettable acres for field (Sum: 8a + 8b + 8c)
Wettable Acre Computational `A'orksheet Completed by:��/ ` `--_f _ .._ Date:
Sipa:u-e of technical specialist

use
Wjko- A-eS
Nutrient Management Plan For Animal Waste Utilization
This plan has been prepared for:
Cypress Creek Farm31274
Herschel Jenkins
692 James Rd
Wallace, NC 28466
910-285-2403
12-09-2002
This plan has been developed by:
Billy W Houston
Duplin Soil & Water
PO Box 219
Kenawville, NC 28349
910-296-2120
In..G
Developer Signature
Type of Plan: Nitrogen Only with Manure Only RECEMIDENRIDWQ
AQUIFER PROTECTION SECTION
Owner/Manager/Producer Agreement DEC 18 Z006
I (we) understand and agree to the specifications and the operation and maintenance
procedures established in this nutrient management plan which includes an animal
waste utilization plan for the farm named above. I have read and understand the
Required Speci ications concerning animal waste management that are included,with
this plan.
w i'm 0 Tz, US
J 1 1
G
Signature (manager or producer)
1a - j-)- 601
Date
This plan meets the minimum standards and specifications of the U.S. Department of
Agriculture - Naturai Resources Conservation Service or the standard of practices
adopted by the Soil and Water Conservation Commission.
Plan Approved By: AW, /L✓ /Mh4
TechnicApecialist signature • Date
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
404314 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 12-10-2002 Cover Page I

Nutrients applied in accordance with this plan will be supplied from the
following source(s):
Commercial Fertilizer is not included in this plan.
S7
Swine Feeder -Finish Lagoon Liquid waste generated 2,447,280 gals/year by
a 2,640 animal Swine Finishing Lagoon Liquid operation. This production
facility has waste storage capacities of approximately 180 days.
Estimated Pounds of Plant Available Nitrogen Generated per Year
Broadcast
5637
Incorporated
9680
Injected
10661
Irrigated
6127
Actual PAN Applied
(Pounds)
Actual Volume Applied
(Gallons)
Volume Surplus/Deficit
(Gallons)
Year 1
6,351.75
2,537,150
-89,870
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Note: In source ID, S means standard source. U means user defined source.
404314 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 12-10-2002 Source Page 1 of I

Narrative
This WUP is written based on a wetted acres footprint completed by Billy W. Houston of Duplin Soli &
Water.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
.� 404314 Database Version 2-0 Date Printed: 12-10-2002 Narrative Page 1 of 1

The table shown below provides a summary of the crops or rotations included in this plan for each field.
Realistic Yield estimates are also provided for each crop in the plan. In addition, the Leaching Index for each
field is shown, where available.
Planned Crops Summary
Tract
Field
Leaching
Index (U)
Soil Seaies
Crop §2guence
RYE
4859
10
NIA
Norfolk
Fescue Pyre
3.5 Tons
4859
11
NIA
NbrUk
Fescue Pin
3.5 Tons
49591
12
NIA
Nor&&
Fescue Pasture
3.5 Tans
4859
13
NIA
Norfolk
Fescue Pin
3.5 Tons
7455
1
N/A
Auuvvdle
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
Hybrid Bermudapm Hay
5.5 Tons
7455
1
N/A
A bvvrile
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
Hybrid Bermudagass Hay
5.5 Tons
7455
3
N/A
Anuyvffle
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
Hybrid Bermudagraz Hai'
5.5 TmA
7455
4
N/A
Norfolk
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
Hybrid Bermudagtass May
6.5 Tons
7455
5
NIA
Foresm
Small Gram Overseed
1.0 Taus
Hybrid Bern udagrass Pin
6.0 Tans
7455
6
N/A
Forestno
Small Gram Overseed
1.0 Tans
Hybrid Bermudagmw Pasture
6.0 Tons
7455
7
N/A
Norfift
Small Gram Overseed
iA Tons
Hybrid Bermudagtass Pasture
6.5 Tons
7455
8
N/A
Nofflk
Small Gram Ovaseed
1.0 Tons
Hybrid � Pin
6.5 Tans
7455
9
N/A
Norfolk
Small Gram Overseed
1.0 Tons
Hybrid Bairardagrnss Pastime
6.5 Tans
Ll
Potential Leaching
Technical Guidance
Low potential to contribute to
None
< 2
soluble nutrient leaching below the
root zone.
> = 2Moderate
potential to contribute to
Nutrient Management (590) should be planned.
< v 10
soluble nutrient leaching below the
of zone.
High potential to contribute to
trient Management (590) should be planned. Other conservation practices that
soluble nutrient leaching below the
prove the soils available water holding capacity and improve nutrient use efficiency
> 10
of zone
[houldbe considered. Examples are Cover Crops (340) to scavenge nutrients,
d-Based Rotations (328), Long -Term No Tdl (778), and edge -of -field practices such
Filter Strips (393) and Riparian Forest Buffers (391).
------------------ - - ---- - -------------------------------------------------------.
404314 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 12-10-2002
--' NOTE: Symbol * means user entered data.
------- - -------------------------
-- - -PCs Page l of I

The Waste Utilization table shown below summarizes the waste utilization plan for this operation. This plan provides an estimate of the number of acres of
cropland needed to use the nutrients being produced. The plan requires consideration of the realistic yields of the crops to be grown, their nutrient
requirements, and proper tinning of applications to maximize nutrient uptake.
This table provides an estimate of the amount of nitrogen required by the crop being grown and an estimate of the nitrogen amount being supplied by
manure or other by-products, commercial fertilizer and residual from previous crops. An estimate of the quantity of solid and liquid waste that will be
applied on each field in order to supply the indicated quantity of nitrogen from each source is also included. A balance of the total manure produced and the
total manure applied is included in the table to ensure that the plan adequately provides for the utilization of the manure generated by the operation.
Depending on the requirements of the crop and the nutrient content of the waste, some nutrients w ill likely be over or under applied if animal waste is being
utilized. Waste should be analyzed before each application cycle and annual soil tests are required if animal waste is being applied. Soil tests should be
used to balance the nutrient application amounts with the realistic yields of the crop to be grown. Nutrient management plans may require that the
application of animal waste be limited so as to prevent over application of phosphorous when excessive levels of this nutrient are detected in a field.
Tract
Field
Source
I.D.
Soil Series
Total
Acre
Use.
Acres
cropRYE
Applic.
Period
Nitrogen
PA
Nutrient
Req'd
Comm.
Fert.
Nutrient
Applied
Res.
(lbs/A)
Applic,
Method
Manure
PA
Nutrient
Applied
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
N
N
N
lbs/A
1000
UA
1000 is
tons
-4859
10
S7
Norfolk
1.84
1,84
Fescue Pasture
3.5 Tons
8/1-7/31
*130
0
0
IrriR.
130
5 L93
0
95.55
0.00
-4859
11
S7
Norfolk
1.94
1.94
Fescue Pasture
3.5 Tons
8/1-7/31
*130
Oi
0
IrriR.
130
51.93
0
100.74
0.00
-4859
12
S7
Norfolk
2.65
2.65
Fescue Pasture
3.5 Tons
8/1-7/31
*130
0
0
IrriR.
130
51.93
0
137.61
0.00
-4859
13
S7
1 Norfolk �
1.55
1.55
Fescue Pasture
3.5 Tons
811-7/31
*130
0
0
IrriR.
130
51.93
01
80.49
0.00
7455
1
S7
Autryville
1.42
1.42
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
10/1-3/31
50
0
0
IrriR.
50
19.97
0
28.36
0.00
7455
1
S7
Autryville
1.42
1.42
Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay
53 Tons
*311-10/31
02751
0
0
IrriA.
275
109.85
0
155.98
0.00
7455
2
S7
Autryville
1.26
1.26
Small Grain Overseed
LO Tons
10/1-3/31
50
0
0
Irrip,
50
19.97
0
25.17
0.00
7455
2
S7
Autryville
1.26
1.26
Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay
5.5 Tons
*311-10/31
*275
0
0
1rriR.
275
109.85
0
138,41
0.00
7455
31
S7
Autryville
1.291
1.29
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
10/1-3/31
50
0
0
Irrig•
50
19.97
D
25.76
0.00
7455
3
S7
Aut y ill,
1.29
1.29
Hybrid Bermudagrass Hay
5.5 Tons
*3/1-10131
*275
0
0
IrriR
1 275
109.85
0
141.70
0.00
--------------------------------------------•------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------..
404314 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 12/10/02 W JT Page 1

Tract
Field
Source
I.D.
Soil Series
Total
Acre
Use.
Acres
Crop
RYE
Applies
I Period
Nitrogai
PA
Nutrient
Req,d
Comm.
Fert.
Nutrient
Applied
Res.
(lbs/A)
Applies
Method
Manure
PA
Nutrient
Applied
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(acre)
Liquid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
Solid
Manure
Applied
(Field)
N
N
N
Ibs/A
1000
l/A
tons
1000 Aals
tons
7455
4
S7
Norfolk
1.65
1.65
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
1011-3/31
50
0
0
Irrig.
50
19.97
0
32.95
0.00
7455
4
97
Norfolk
1.65
1.65
Hybrid 6crmudagrass Hay
6,5 Tons
*311-10131
*325
0
0
Imp.
325
129.82
0
214.20
0.00
7455
5
S7
Foreston
3.34
3,34
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
1011-3131
50
0
0
Irrix
50
19.97
0
66.71
0.00
7455
5
S7
Foreston
3.34
3.34
Hybrid Bermudagrass Pasture
6.0 Tones
*311.10/31
*225
0
0
IrriK
225
89.87
0
300.18
0.00
7455
6
S7
Foreston
3.27
3.27
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tones
10/1.3/31
50
0
0
Irriz
50
19.97
0
65.31
0.00
7455
6
S7
Foreston
3.27
3.27
Hybrid Bermudagrass Pasture
6.0 Tons
*3/1-10/31
*225
0
0
Irrix
225
89.87
0
293.69
0.00
7455
7
S7
Norfolk
2,43
2.43
small Chain Overseed
1.0 Tons
10/1-3131
50
0
0
Irrim
50
19.97
0
48.53
0.00
7455
7
87
Norfolk
2,43
4.43
Hybrid Bamudagrass Pasture
6.5 Tons
*311-10/31
*2441
0
0
Irrix
244
97.46
01
236.84
0.00
7455
8
67
Norfolk
1.69
1.69
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
1011-3/31
50
0
0
1nip,
50
19.97
0
33.75
0.00
7455
8
S7
Norfolk
1.69
1,691
Hybrid Bermudagrass Pasture
6.5 Torres
*3/1.10/31
*244
0
0
Irrix
244
97.46
0
164.71
0,00
7455
9
S7
Norfolk
1.28
1.28
Small Grain Overseed
1.0 Tons
10/1.3/31
50
0
0
Irri&
50
19.97
0
25.56
0100
7455
9
S7
Norfolk
1.28
1.28
Hybrid Bamudagrass Pasture
6.5 Tons
*3/1-10131
*244
0
0
Irri&
244
97.46
0
124.75
0,00
Total Applied, 1000 gallons
2,537.15
Lagoon Liquids
Total Produced, 1000 gallons
2,447.26
Balance, 1000 gallons
-89.87
•
Total Applied, tone
;
0.00
Manure Solids
Total Produced, tons
'
0100
Balance, tone
0.00
Notes; 1. In the tract column, symbol -means leased, otherwise, owned. 2• Symbol * means user entered data.
-•---•----------•------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ --------------------------- -.
404314 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 12/10/02 WUT Page 2

The irrigation Application Factors for each field in this plan are shown in the following table.
Infiltration rate varies with soils. If applying waste nutrients through an irrigation system, you must
apply at a rate that will not result in runoff_ This table provides the maximum application rate per hour
that may be applied to each field selected to receive wastewater. it also lists the maximum application
amount that each field may receive in any one application event.
Irrigation Application Factors
Tract
Field
Sod Series
Application Rate
Onches/hour)
Application Amount
(inches)
4859
10
Norfolk
0.50
0.96
4859
11
Norfolk
0.50
0.96
4859
112
Norfolk
0.50
0.96
4859
13
Norfolk
0.50
0.96
7455
1
Auttyvdle
0.60
0.72
7455
2
Autryville
0.60
0.72
7455
3
AnftMlc
0.60
0.72
7455
14
Norfolk
0.50
0.%
7455
5
Fonstom -
0.50
0.%
7455
6
Foreston
0.50
0.96
7455
7
Norfolk
0.50
0.96
7455
8
Norfolk
0.50
0.%
7455 19
Norfolk
0.50
0.96
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
�- 404314 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 12-10-2002 lAF Page I of 1

The fallowing Lagoon Sludge Nitrogen Utilization table provides an estimate of the number of acres needed for
sludge utilization for the indicated accumulation period. These estimates are based on average nitrogen
concentrations for each source, the number of animals in the facility and the plant available nitrogen application
rates shown in the second column.
Lagoon sludge contains nutrients and organic matter remaining after treatment and application of the effluent. At
clean out, this material must be utilized for crop production and applied at agronomic rates. In most cases, the
priority nutrient is nitrogen but other nutrients including phosphorous, copper and zinc can also be limiting.
Since nutrient levels are generally very high, application of sludge must be carefully applied.
Sites must first be evaluated for their suitability for sludge application. Ideally, effluent spray fields should not
be used for sludge application. Ifthis is not possible, care should betaken not to bad effluent application fields
with high amounts of copper and zinc so that additional effluent cannot be applied. On sites vulnerable to surface
water moving to streams and lakes, phosphorous is a concern. Soils containing very high phosphorous levels
may also be a concern.
Lagoon. Sludge Nitrogen Utilization Table
Crop
Maximum
PA-N Rate
lb/ac
Maximum Sludge
Application Rate
1000 gal/ac
Minimum Acres
5 Years Accumulation
Minimum Acres
10 Years Accumulation
Minimum Acres
15 Years Accumulation
Swine Feeder -Finish Lagoon Sludge - Standard
Com 120 bu
150
13.16
33-10
66.19
99-29
Hay 6 too K.Y.E.
300
26.32
16-55
33.10
49-64
Soybean 40 bu
160
14-04
31.03
62-06
93.08
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
404314 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 12-10-2002 Sludge Page l of 1

The Available Waste Storage Capacity table provides an estimate of the number of days of storage
capacity available at the end of each month ofthe plan. Available storage capacity is calculated as the
design storage capacity in days minus the number of days of net storage volume accumulated. The
start date is a value entered by the user and is defined as the date prior to applying nutrients to the first
crop in the plan at which storage volume in the lagoon or holding pond is equal to zero.
Available storage capacity should be greater than or equal to zero and less than or equal to the design
storage capacity of the facility. If the available storage capacity is greater than the design storage
capacity, this indicates that the plan calls for the application of nutrients that have not yet accumulated.
If available storage capacity is negative, the estimated volume of accumulated waste exceeds the
design storage volume of the structure. Either ofthese situations indicates that the planned application
interval in the waste utilization plan is inconsistent with the structure's temporary storage capacity.
Available Waste Stnraoe Capacity
Source Name
I Swine Feeder -Finish Lagoon Liquid
Design Stora Ca cirj
Start Date
10/30
190
Plan Year
Month
Available Storage Capacity (Days)'
1
I
154.
1
2
141
1
3
162
1
4
175
1
5
180
1
6
180
1
7
7 `180
1
8
180
1
9
180
1
!0
164
1
11
149
1
12
135
* Available Storage Capacity is calculated as of the end of each month.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- - ----
- - - - -----------------
404314 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed- 12-10-2002 Capacity Page 1 of 1

Required Specifications For Animal Waste Management
1. Animal waste shall not reach surface waters of the state by runoff, drift,
manmade conveyances, direct application, or direct discharge during
operation or land application. Any discharge of waste that reaches
surface water is prohibited.
2. There most be documentation in the design folder that the producer
either owns or has an agreement for use of adequate land on which to
properly apply the waste. If the producer does not own adequate land to
properly dispose of the waste, he/she shall provide evidence of an
agreement with a landowner, who is within a reasonable proximity,
allowing him/her the use of the land for waste application. It is the
responsibility of the owner of the waste production facility to secure an
update of the Nutrient Management Plan when there is a change in the
operation, increase in the number of animals, method of application,
receiving crop type, or available land.
3. Animal waste shall be applied to meet, but not exceed, the nitrogen needs
for realistic crop yields based upon soil type, available moisture,
historical data, climatic conditions, and level of management, unless
there are regulations that restrict the rate of applications for other
nutrients.
4. Animal waste shall be applied to land eroding less than 5 tons per acre
per year. Waste may be applied to land eroding at more than 5 tons per
acre per year but less than 10 tons per acre per year provided grass filter
strips are installed where runoff leaves the field (see USDA, NRCS Field
Office Technical Guide Standard 393 - Filter Strips).
5. Odors can be reduced by injecting the, waste or by disking after waste
application. Waste should not be applied when there is danger of drift
from the land application field.
b. When animal waste is to be applied on acres subject to flooding, waste
will be soil incorporated on conventionally tilled cropland. When waste is
applied to conservation tilled crops or grassland, the waste may be
broadcast provided the application does not occur during a season prone
to flooding (see "Weather and Climate in North Carolina" for
guidance).
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
�-' 404314 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed_ 12/10/02 Specification Paize 1

7. Liquid waste shall be applied at rates not to exceed the soil infiltration
-� rate such that runoff does not occur offsite or to surface waters and in a
method which does not cause drift from the site during application. No
ponding should occur in order to control odor and flies.
8. Animal waste shall not be applied to saturated soils, during rainfall
events, or when the soil surface is frozen.
9. Animal waste shall be applied on actively growing crops in such a
manner that the crop is not covered with waste to a depth that would
inhibit growth. The potential for salt damage from animal waste should
also be considered.
10. Nutrients from waste shall not be applied in fall or winter for spring
planted crops on soils with a high potential for leaching. Wasteinutrient
loading rates on these soils should be held to a minimum and a suitable
winter cover crop planted to take up released nutrients. Waste shall not
be applied more than 30 days prior to planting of the crop or formes
breaking dormancy.
11. Any new swine facility sited on or after October 1,1995 shall comply
with the following: The outer perimeter of the land area onto which
`J waste is applied from a lagoon that is a component of a swine farm shall
be at least 50 feet from any residential property boundary and canal.
Animal waste, other than swine waste from facilities sited on or after
October 1,1995, shall not be applied closer that 25 feet to perennial
waters.
12. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 100 feet to wells.
13. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 200 feet of dwellings other
than those owned by the landowner.
14. Waste shall be applied in a manner not to reach other property and
public right of ways.
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
404314 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 12/10/02 Specification Pa;-e 2

15. Animal waste shall not be discharged into surface waters, drainageways,
or wetlands by a discharge or by over -spraying. Animal waste may be
applied to prior converted cropland provided the fields have been
approved as a land application site by a "technical specialist". Animal
waste shall not be applied on grassed waterways that discharge directly
into water courses, and on other grassed waterways, waste shall be
applied at agronomic rates in a manner that causes no runoff or drift
from the site.
16. Domestic and industrial waste from washdown facilities, showers, toilets,
sinks, etc., shall not be discharged into the animal waste management
system.
17. A protective cover of appropriate vegetation will be established on all
disturbed areas (lagoon embanlmZents, berms, pipe runs, etc.). Areas
shall be fenced, as necessary, to protect the vegetation. Vegetation such
as trees, shrubs, and other woody species, etc., are limited to areas where
considered appropriate. Lagoon areas should be kept mowed and
accessible. Berms and structures should be inspected regularly for
evidence of erosion, leakage, or discharge.
18. H animal production at the facility is to be suspended or terminated, the
owner is responsible for obtaining and implementing a "closure plan"
which will eliminate the possibility of an illegal discharge, pollution, and
erosion.
19. Waste handling structures, piping, pumps, reels, etc., should be
inspected on a regular basis to prevent breakdowns, leaks, and spills. A
regular maintenance checklist should be kept on site.
20. Animal waste can be used in a rotation that includes vegetables and
other crops for direct human consumption. However, if animal waste is
used on crops for direct human consumption, it should only be applied
pre -plant with no further applications of animal waste during the crop
season.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
' 404314 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 12/10/02 Specification Page 3

21. Highly visible markers shall be installed to mark the top and bottom
elevations of the temporary storage (pumping volume) of all waste
treatment lagoons. Pumping shall be managed to maintain the liquid
level between the markers. A marker will be required to mark the
maximum storage volume for waste storage ponds.
22. Waste shall be tested within 60 days of utilization and soil shall be tested
at least annually at crop sites where waste products are applied.
Nitrogen shall be the rate -determining nutrient, unless other restrictions
require waste to be applied based on other nutrients, resulting in a lower
application rate than a nitrogen based rate. Zinc and copper levels in
the soils shall be monitored and alternative crop sites shall be used when
these metals approach excessive levels. pH shall be adjusted and
maintained for optimum crop production. Soil and waste analysis
records shall be kept for a minimum of five years. Poultry dry waste
application records shall be maintained for a minimum of three years.
Waste application records for all other waste shall be maintained for five
(5) years.
23. Dead animals will be disposed of in a manner that meets North Carolina
regulations.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
`' 404314 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 12r10/02 Specification ire 4

Crop Notes
The following crop note applies to field(s): 4
Bermudagrass Coastal Plain, Mineral Soil, Moderately Well Drained.
Adaptation: Well --adapted.
In the Coastal Plain, hybrid bermudagrass sprigs can be planted Mar. I to Mar. 31. Cover sprigs 1" to 3"
deep (1.5" optimal). Sprigs should be planted quickly after digging and not allowed to dry in sun and wind.
For Coastal and Tifton 78 plant at least 10 bu/ac in 3' rows, spaced 2' to 3' in the row. Generally a rate of
30 bu/ac is satisfactory to produce full groundcover in one or two years under good growing conditions.
Tifton 44 spreads slowly, so use at least 40 bu/ac in 1.5' to 2' rows spaced 1' to 1.5' in row. For
broadcast/disked-in sprigs use about 60 bu/ac. Soil test for the amounts of lime, phosphorus, potassium
and micronutrients to apply preplant and for annual maintenance. Apply 60 to 100 ib/ac N in the
establishment year in split applications in April and July. For established stands apply 180 to 240 lb/ac N
annually in split applications, usually in April and following the first and second hay cuts. Reduce N rates
by 25% for grazing. Refer to NCSU Technical Bulletin 305 Production and Utilization of Pastures and
Forages in North Carolina for more information or consult your regional agronomist or extension agent for
assistance.
The following crop note applies to fceld(s): 1, 2, 3
Bermudagrass Coastal Plain, Mineral Soil, Moderately Well Drained -
Adaptation: Well -adapted.
In the Coastal Plain, hybrid bermudagrass sprigs can be planted Mar. 1 to Mar. 31. Cover sprigs I" to 3"
deep (1.5" optimal). Sprigs should be planted quickly after digging and not allowed to dry in sun and wind.
For Coastal and Tifton 78 plant at least 10 bu/ac in 3' rows, spaced 2' to 3' in the row. Generally a rate of
30 bu/ac is satisfactory to produce full groundcover in one or two years under good growing conditions.
Tifton 44 spreads slowly, so use at least 40 bu/ac in 1.5' to 2' rows spaced P to 1.5' in row. For
broadcast/disked-in sprigs use about 60 bu/ac. Soil test for the amounts of lime, phosphorus, potassium
and micronutrients to apply preplant and for annual maintenance. Apply 60 to 100 lb/ac N in the
establishment year in split applications in April and July. For established stands apply 180 to 240 lb/ac N
annually in split applications, usually in April and following the first and second hay cuts. Reduce N rates
by 25% for grazing. Refer to NCSU Technical Bulletin 305 Production and Utilization of Pastures and
Forages in North Carolina for more information or consult your regional agronomist or extension agent for
assistance.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-` 404314 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 12-10-2002 Crop Note Page t of 4

The following crop note applies to field(s): 10, 11, 12, 13
-- Fescue: Coastal Plain, Mineral Soil, Moderately Well Drained
Adaptation: Marginal.
In the Coastal Plain, tall fescue can be planted Sept. 1 to Oct. IS (best) and Feb. 15 to Mar. 20. For
pure -stand broadcast seedings use 20 to 30 lb/ac., for drilled use 15 to 20 lb/ac. seed. Use certified seed to
avoid introducing weeds or annual ryegrass. Plant seed 0.25" to 0.5" deep for pure stands, 0.25" in mixture
with clovers. Tall fescue requires adequate soil moisture for persistence and production. Soil test for
preplant and maintenance lime, phosphorus, and potassium recommendations. Apply 40 to 60 lb/ac
nitrogen at planting for pure stands only. Do not apply N for mixtures with clovers but use proper legume
inoculation techniques. Apply 150 to 200 Ib/ac. N to pure -stand fescue for hay production; reduce N rates
by 25% for gazing. Apply N Feb. 1 to Mar. 20 and Aug. 20 to Sept. 30, with equal amounts in each
window. Refer to NCSU Technical Bulletin 305 Production and Utilization of Pastures and Forages in
North Carolina for additional information or consult your regional agronomist or extension agent for
assistance.
The following crop note applies to field(s): 5, 6
Small Grain: CP, Mineral Soil, low -leachable
In the Coastal Plain, oats and barley should be planted from October 15-October 30; and rye from October
15 November 20. For barley, plant 22 seed/drill row foot and increase the seeding rate by 5% for each
week seeding is delayed beyond the optimum time. See the seeding rates table for applicable seeding rate
modifications in the current NCSU "Small Grain Production Guide". Also, increase the initial seeding rate
by at least 10% when planting no -till. Oats should be planted at 2 bushels/acre and rye at 1-1 1/2
�— bushels/acre. Plant all these small grains at 1-1 1/2" deep. Adequate depth control is essential. Review the
NCSU Official Variety "green book" and information from private companies to select a high yielding
variety with the characteristics needed for your area and conditions. Apply no more than 30 lbs/acre N at
planting, Phosphorus and potash recommended by a soil test can also be applied at this time. The
remaining N should be applied during the months of February March.
The following crop note applies to field(s): 4, 7, 8, 9
Small Grain: CP, Mineral Soil, medium leachable
In the Coastal Plain, oats and barley should be planted from October 15-October 30; and rye from October
15-November 20. For barley, plant 22 seed/drill row foot and increase the seeding rate by 5% for each
week seeding is delayed beyond the optimum time. See the seeding rates table for applicable seeding rate
modifications in the current NCSU "Small Grain Production Guide". Also, increase the initial seeding rate
by at least 10% when planting no -till. Oats should be planted at 2 bushels/acre and rye at 1-1 1/2
bushels/acre. Plant all these small grains at 1-1 1/2" deep. Adequate depth control is essential. Review the
NCSU Official Variety "green book" and information from private companies to select a high yielding
variety with the characteristics needed for your area and conditions. Apply no more than 30 lbs/acre N at
planting. Phosphorus and potash recommended by a soil test can also be applied at this time. The
remaining N should be applied during the months of February -March.
--------- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
404314 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 12-10-2002 Crop Note Page 2 of 4

The following crop note applies to field(s): 1, 2, 3
Small Grain: CP, Mineral Soil, medium leachable
In the Coastal Plain, oats and barley should be planted from October 15-October 30; and rye from October
15 November 20. For barley, plant 22 seed/drill row foot and increase the seeding rate by 5% for each
week seeding is delayed beyond the optimum time. See the seeding rates table for applicable seeding rate
modifications in the current NCSU "Small Grain Production Guide". Also, increase the initial seeding rate
by at least 10% when planting no -till. Oats should be planted at 2 bushels/acre and rye at 1-1 112
bushels/acre. Plant all these small grains at 1-1 1/2" deep. Adequate depth control is essential. Review the
NCSU Official Variety "green book" and information from private companies to select a high yielding
variety with the characteristics needed for your area and conditions. Apply no more than 30 lbs/acre N at
planting. Phosphorus and potash recommended by a soil test can also be applied at this time. The
remaining N should be applied during the months of February -March.
The following crop note applies to field(s): 5, 6
Bermudagrass CP, Mineral Soil, Poorly Drained to Somewhat Poorly Drained
Adaptation: Effective artificial drainage MUST be in place to achieve Realistic Yield Expectations
provided for these soils.
In the Coastal Plain, hybrid bermudagrass sprigs can be planted Mar. I to Mar. 31. Cover sprigs i" to 3"
deep (1.5" optimal). Sprigs should be planted quickly after digging and not allowed to dry in sun and wind.
For Coastal and Tifton 78 plant at least 10 bu/ac in 3' rows, spaced 2' to 3' in the row. Generally a rate of
30 bu/ac is satisfactory to produce full groundcover in one or two years under good growing conditions.
Tifton 44 spreads slowly, so use at least 40 bu/ac in 1.5' to 2' rows spaced 1' to 1.5' in row. For
broadcast/disked-in sprigs use about 60 bu/ac. Soil test for the amounts of lime, phosphorus, potassium
and micronutrients to apply preplant and for annual maintenance. Apply 60 to 100 lb/ac N in the
establishment year in split applications in April and duly. For established stands apply 180 to 240 lb/ac N
annually in split applications, usually in April and following the first and second hay cuts. Reduce N rates
by 25% for grazing- Refer to NCSU Technical Bulletin 305 Production and Utilization of Pastures and
Forages in North Carolina for more information or consult your regional agronomist or extension agent for
assistance.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------�
ase -------------------
404314 DatabVersion 2.0 Date Printed: 12-10-2002 Cr Note e 3 of 4

The following crop note applies to f eld(s): 7, 8, 9
Bermudagrass: CP, Mineral Soil, Moderately Well Drained
Adaptation: Well -adapted.
In the Coastal Plain, hybrid bermudagrass sprigs can be planted Mar. 1 to Mar. 31. Cover sprigs 1" to 3"
deep (1.5" optimal). Sprigs should be planted quickly after digging and not allowed to dry in sun and wind -
For Coastal and Tifton 78 plant at least 10 bu/ac in 3' rows, spaced 2' to 3' in the row. Generally a rate of
30 bu/ac is satisfactory to produce fall groundcover in one or two years under good growing conditions.
Tifton 44 spreads slowly, so use at least 40 bu/ac in 1.5' to 2' rows spaced 1' to 1.5' in row. For
broadcasttdisked-in sprigs use about 60 bu/ac. Soil test for the amounts of lime, phosphorus, potassium
and n&ronutrients to apply preplant and for annual maintenance. Apply 60 to 100 lb/ac N in the
establishment year in split applications in April and July. For established stands apply 180 to 240 lb/ac N
annually in split applications, usually in April and following the first and second hay cuts. Reduce N rates
by 25% for grazing. Refer to NCSU Technical Bulletin 305 Production and Utilization of Pastures and
Forages in North Carolina for more information or consult your regional agronomist or extension agent for
assistance.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------
404314 Database Version 2.0 Date Printed: 12-10-2002 Cr Note Page 4 of 4

r
WETTABLE ACRES
IRRIGATION SYSTEM DESIGN PARMATERS
and
COMPUTATIONAL WORKSHEET SUMMARY
Landowner/ Operator Name Herschel Jenkins
Adress 692 James Rd.
Wallace, NC 28466
Telephone [phone]
TABLE 1 - Field Specifications
COUNTY Duplin
DATE 12.15.102
Tract
Number
Hydrant
or
field (1)
Number
acres
start end
wetted
area
acres
middle
wetted
area
aces
stop end
wetted
area
Apprmbdmate
Mamdmun
Useable Size
of field (2)
(acres) Table
column
Length
of
pulls
Infest
Width
of
pulls
infest
Soil Type
Slope
(%)
Crop(s)
Mamdmun
Application
Rate (3)
(INhr)
Mamdumn
Application
per Irrigation
cycle (3)
(inches)
7465
pl
0.26
1.16
0
1.42 EE90
B-C
325
156
AUB
0.5
Bermuda
0.5
1
7455
p2
0.26
1
0
1.28 EE90
B-C
280
156
AUB
0.5
Bermuda
0.5
1
7455
p3
0.26
.391.64
0
1.29 EE90
B-C
222J179
76.51158
AUB
M
Bermuda
0.5
1
7455
p4
0.26
1.39
0
1.65 EE90
B-C
387
156
NOS
0.5
Bermuda
0.5
1
7455
p5
0.28
3.08
0
3.34 EE90
B.0
860
158
FOA
0.5
Bermuda
0.5
1
7465
p6
0.25
3.02
0
3.27 E190
B.0
860
153
FOA
0.5
Bermuda
0.5
1
7465
p7
0.26
2.18
0
2.43 E190
B-C
620
153
NOB
0-5
Bermuda
0.5
1
7455
p8
0.25
1.44
0
1.69 E190
B-C
410
153
NOB
0-5
Bennuda
0.5
1
7455
139
0.26
1.02
0
1.28 EE90
B-C
285
156
NOB
0.5
Bermuda
0.5
1
1 see attached map.
2 Total field acre minus required buffer areas.
3 Refer to N.C. Irrigation guide, Field Office Technical Guide, Section II G. Annual application must not exceed the agronomic rates for the soli and crap used,
Wettable Acre Computational Warksheet Completed by: Bill Houston Date 12.15.102

WETTABLE ACRES
IRRIGATION SYSTEM DESIGN PARMATERS
and
COMPUTATIONAL WORKSHEET SUMMARY
Landowner / Operator Name Herschel Jenkins
Adress 692 James Rd.
Wallace, NC 28466
Telephone [phone]
0
TABLE 1 - Field Specifications
COUNTY Duplin
DATE 12./5./02
Tract
Number
Hydrant
or
field (1)
Number
acres
start end
wetted
area
ages
middle
wetted
area
acres
atop end
wetted
area
Apprcodmste
Mendmun
Useable Size
of field (2)
(acres) Table
column
Length
of
pulls
in feet
Width
of
pulls
Infest_
SoIlTypa,(96)
Slope
Crop(s)
Maxdmun
Application
Rate (3)
(in/hr)
Mwdumn
Application
per Irrigation
cycle (3)
(inches)
4859
p10
0.26
1.58
0
1.84 EE90
13-C
440
156
NOS
0-5
Fescue
0,5
1
4859
ell
0.25
1.69
0
1.94 E190
B-C
480
153
N09
0-5
Fescue
0.5
1
4859
p12
0.17
1.51/.97
0
2.65 EE90
S-C
4301352
1531120
NOB
0-5
Fescue
0.5
1
4859
p13
0.25
1.3
0
1.55 EE80
B-C
370
153
NOS
0.5
Fescue
0.5
1
1 see attached map.
2 Total field acreage minus required buffer areas.
3 Refer to N.C. Irrigation guide, Field Office Technical Guide, Section II G. Annual application must not exceed the agronomic rates for the loll and crop used. 1
Wettable Acre Computational Worksheet Completed by: I Billy Houston Date 12./5J02 = � r

i M=274.
12
' x o -r "l�s�l •ra ��f -.. re .r'!� �.�• .'ri say' R��r: ., o,,e�
Vi
Al
U. '[JM' _ .iii . s�• f` r - t- o ` �a .s irW x�` #^ 't' ? _' �* - s -.,
JL
L i + k
- 1 ➢ - a _ � a �'' _ t - �� •- '9 fs`��i, �s �r'3 '�J•-tea � � ..q, n ' Ci''
- /10
/P
t :_.� �'� P� � d _- �aF'tr �'�]:' � r ' 3x � ! �- "'•cx '*sue' y � : `
s r � ♦� �� „� a
`„`k� .�`J,��"°;�;'u,N 4��� �. 1L� k� fig. �-� � �R-. � i' ¢�^ `s ,•��'
Oak
` ¢� fit° �+ "��`+� Y+�6E' � , �` ' • �/ -, �;`; �� F .;� �
M Fes' r s� ...V�� -, y� _ ,�. - �, '1 _••�F a ..

may--26-02 04:0S FM 8iLLY$ IRRIGRTION 9102859601
1.r
TAPER/RING N - —LE PERFORMANCE - U.S. UNITS
NELSON BIG GUNS 407' 30 -7s �70
Row rate in GPM. Diameter in feet
TR-G
100 SERIES BIG GUN - 2-C TRAJECTORY - TAPER/RING NOZZLE
Noah
Nazda
Noza�
t%da
Nozzlea
Nile
N`
�
i?8.1
lemm
GPM DW
1t'mm
GPM DIA.
I&= i
GPM DLk
19irm
GPM DW
20mm
GPM D1A
21mm
i3Pb1 DIA.
Zam
rM DW
GPM W
V 212
86 M
11D 242
258'
125 290
':139'. _-:
�6j` •W
': '_T1 =
151 259
.': _ �;�'
186 275
"•'
76 2%
'
98 233
60�.;
- 7?+I•:..:,8�
..T31':
; 11T 24p
710' 250
123
187 29fi
te8 294
203 303
OD
83 239
80
94 246
' ::. 2sa.
106 264
.114 ZdB
120 264
13Q 2t7•
135 273
'IiB ; '
t53 281
_:po~.
•` ? „ `` .'
;;' '
80
% 259
..0
108 260
"
122 278'
139' 268
1-% 297
'
.
176 X6
193 319336
':
a0i•. : s
i15 .':278..
130 ?�B
147 2w
16fr :
:18f!= •" ...
-::'
Im
107 2M
121 288
'•;, '2�8:
137 2W
1% 308
175 318
;
197 327
r8::
216 334
240 344
; �15t-- -,
282
r¢:;
?f1Q"
112 =' : =
-
t43 3p8
1a3 317
.18$ 3Z!'I
`237.
/oz GPM IV! W,44W Oil
160 SERIES BIG GUN - 2t TRAJECTORY - TAPER/RING NOZZLE
M tie Nozzle Nozz1a Nuzzle r I Nardo WMENS
22rrm 24rtm 2916AI+ 29mm 30 m saw"
P.S.I. (EMI DIA. GPM D►A. GPM D1A. GPMA DIA Cam DiA. GPM DM1.
5o
135
270
164
286
70
159'Y
299
194
315
3m
90
181
320
220
34D
110
2y�D,yD�
339
243
359
• 'lrk1;
_.av
•. _ , .'.
: 2G3
. 31i9
198
238
319
274
333
319
947
414
S47
255
: 3:i4
.8[Ii:
�- :'
''
.. -
231
331
276
349
325
3m
378
382
24T
$40
72ss
262.
357
313
377
36
30
4m
411
277
365
330
-
290
378
346
397
4o7
410
474
433
3m
as _
361
40
42s.::
42et :
'4 •:.. ;:'' ..,'.
Nozzle
34a"
GPM DIA, I
369 us
437 aw
496 424
. ~
.51.:
The above distance of throw data has been calculated based on a briet, comparative test end data from the Nelson SH
Series ft tam Catalog. In equal conditions the distance of throw for the TapetlRing nozzle is i % leas than tiro Tapes
Bore nozzle and 2% more than the Ring nozzle.
Perforrltarloe data hm been obUned urlflei idaai test conditions and stay be adverse► affected by wind, poor
hydraulic entrance conditlorm or other factors. No reVesentallon regarding droplet corldltlorl. appiiCat1011 rate or
suitaNlity for a particcilar applhx&on Is made herein.
Innovation In I,+�I tlon rm
Z
MN
IRRIGATION CORPORATION
Route 4. Box 169. Akpon road
Walla Wad, WA 99362-9426 USA
Rcm: (509) 525.76M
FAX M91525-7907
E-MAIL: rastoo6nelsonicrcm
WEB rATE: www.neleorftcom

Acreage Determination Procedures
/,cev"ater Application Equipment
Hard Hose Traveling Gun System
FIELD DATA WORKSHEET*
1. Make and model number AG -&ci i n _ T
i
2. Hose length
i; D [feet] and hose inside diameter (ID) [inch)
3. Gun make and model number. 1Da
4. Gun nozzle size [inch), ring orifice, _,22 /%,%— taper bore orifice
i 5. Gun arc angle I Fro [degrees)
6. Travel lane spacing [feet]. Indicate whether uniform or = _ random.
Number of exterior hydrants . Number of interior hydrants
7. Gun wetted diameter 1' 2 [feet). ✓ measured or based on gun chart.
8. Gun pressure ;_l.o [psi] ✓ observed at working garage,
determined from gun charts, calculated (show calculations)
*19 Operating pressure at hose reel 10 [psi]. ✓' observed at wo:ring g3uge or
provided by owner.
*`10. Supply line size [inch] (from pump to last hydrant)
**1 i. Supply line length feet (maximum pumping distance)
**12. Supplti- line type - �E_ R%'C or alurninum
**13. Pump make and model number l : P,R [ ` l Z TPM.3
*`1.1. Pump capacity [gprn)
** 15. Engine mane and model number Al41r /'� V f_ )-l=t-Q v✓ 9001- A,4- L-
I or
**16. Electric motor horsepower and rpm 10 (hp) 2 lfb� [rpm;
Note: It is strongly recommended that yott yield determine wetted diameter and operating
pressure at the reel and gun.
* Locate each hydrant on a copy of the map. Indicate the start and stop of the sprinkler cart
` for each travel lane and show the distance traveled. Show the location of the supply line.
Irrigated acres are determined by the travel lane.
i
Optional data, furnish where possible.
*' Information furnished by
--� -► and-orLEA `W
Signature of ov+•ner or faciiit prMntative Signaturi9of technical specia..s.
14oyA,,
Printed name of.o%%ner or facility representative !Tinted hame of technical specia!;st
Da•e j [ b ti _ _ Date_
f *** Only the person or people collecting the data should sign the Feld Data Worksheet. _.
�; 14
4
5

(.WuIdjp le worksheets may be rieeded)
HARD HOSE TRAVELER
IRRIGATION SYSTEM
Hard Hose Traveling Gun System
COMPUTATIONAL WORKSHEET
1. Farm number (identification) 31-a' Field number (identification) 1
2. Irrigation system designation ✓ Existing irrigation system New/expanded irrigation system
3. Number of travel lanes # Interior lanes # Exterior lanes 32-L feet] Length of pull(L1)
# Interior lanes 2 # Exterior lanes o [feet] Length of puli(L2)
# Interior lanes _ # Exterior lanes ! a [feet] Length of pull(1-3)
4. Wetted diameter [feet] from Field Data Worksheet
S. Spacing Hydrant spacing [feet] [as a percentage of wetted diameter]
6. Hydrant layout Multiple hydrants Single hydrant — Excessively spaced hydrants
7. Read the irrigated area per travel pull for the given wetted diameter from the appropriate table and column
based on pattem, spacing, and travel lane location.
Travel lane length (L_) Interior or _I Exterior (lane/hydrant)
.26 (a) Acres start end of pull from Table r-C10 Column
(b) Acres middle portion of pull (Ll)
{Putt length,ZL [feet] X Wetted width 16-6 [feet]; / 43,560
(c) Acres stop end of pull from Table 1' Column C
V 42• Total acres for travel lane length (U) (Sum: a + b + c)
Travel tame length (L, w Interior or _.2__Erterior (lane/hydrant)
_, 2.b (a) Acres start end of pull from Table r-Eq --1 Column 13
1.01> (b) Acres middle portion of pull (1-2)
.J (PulI lengthyY-Q- [feet] X Wetted width IS"& {€eet]1 / 43,560
(c) Acres stop end of pull from Table Column C
1.2-6Total acres for travel lane length (L2) (Sum: a + b + c)
Travel lane length (L_) Interior or _ _Exterior (lane/hydrant)
. 26 (a) Acres start end of pull from Table EC 4o _ Column 13
0 - J 9 (b) Acres middle portion of pull (1-3)r-
�' 6`{ (Pull length_? �4 [feet] X Wetted width 1S`6 [feet]i / 43,560
(c) Acres stop end of pull from Table ' Column C
1.2ct Total acres for travel lane length (L3) (Sum: a + b + c)
8. Multiply the tabulated irrigated acreage value per travel pull by the number of pulls of each
category in the field. Add all of these, and this is the total irrigated acreage for the field.
1, Lf 2- (a) Acres per travel lane length (1-1)
X
# Lanes =
Acres
i . 26 (b) Acres per travel lane length (1-2)
X
# Lanes =
,acres
1.2°t (c) Acres per travel lane length (L3)
X
# Lanes =
Acres
33 ? Total CA,ilv3fP wettable acres for field (Sum: 8a + 8b + 8c)
Wettable Acre Computational Worksheet Completed by: _ Q )per '; ,f ,4 _ Date: r j
.Signature of technical specialist

�bfeiltiA;e woAsleeets may be needed;
HARD HOSE TRAVELER
IRRIGATION SYSTEM
\.�
Hard Hose Traveling Gun System
COMPUTATIONAL WORKSHEET
1. Farm number (identification) Field number (identification)
2. Irrigation systern designation Existing irrigation system New/expanded irrigation system
3. Number of travel lanes # Interior lanes # Exterior lanes J3P9 feet] Length of pull(L1)
# Interior lanes # Exterior lanes Eby [feet] Length of pull(L2)
# Interior lanes # Exterior lanes eP6 D [feet] Length of pull(L3)
4. Wetted diameter [feet] from Field Data Worksheet
5_ Spacing Hydrant spacing [feet] [as a percentage of wetted diameter]
6. Hydrant layout Multiple hydrants Single hydrant Excessively spaced hydrants
7. Read the irrigated area per travel pull for the given wetted diameter from the appropriate table and column
based on pattern, spacing, and travel lane location.
Travel lane length (Lj Interior of `f Exterior (lane/hydrant)
, z& (a) Acres start end of pull from Table EE4 Column Q
—301 (b) Acres middle portion of pull (L1)
{Pull length IM [feet] X Wetted width Id-6 [feet]; / 43,560
(c) Acres stop end of pull from Table I Column t
).45'Total acres for travel lane length (LI) (Sum: a + b + c)
Travel lane length (L, - Interior or S Exterior (lane/hydrant)
! 14 (a) Acres start end of pull from Table _ FE yu Column 13
3.UYr (b) Acres middle portion of pull (1.2)
jPull length -Eta [Feet] X Wetted width 15-4 [feet]} / 43,560
(c) Acres stop end of pull from Table !i Column C
3_.3 44 Total acres for travel lane length (L2) (Sum: a + b + c)
Travel lane length (L, & Interior or Exterior (Lane/hvdrant)
.,25-(a) Acres start end of pull from Table E140 Column B
.02. (b) Acres middle portion of pull (1-3)
(Pull length 9b [feet] X Wetted width IS-3-jfeet]f / 43,560
___(c) Acres stop end of pull from Table r' Column G
119 Total acres for travel lane length (L3) (Sum: a + b + c)
8. Multiply the tabulated irrigated acreage value per travel pull by the number of pulls of each
category in the field. Add all of these, and this is the total irrigated acreage for the field.
_• 65' (a) Acres per travel lane length (U) X # Lanes = Acres
3.3 N (b) Acres per travel lane length (1-2) X # Lanes = Acres
3.1') (c) Acres per travel lane length (L3) X # Lanes = ` Acres
9.1.6 Total CAWMP wettable acres for field (Sum: 8a + 8b + 8c)
Wettable Acre Computational Worksheet Completed by: Date: �L -
Signature of technical specialist

( ultip;e worksheets may be needed)
./
L
HARD HOSE TRAVELER
IRRIGATION SYSTEM
Hard Hose Traveling Gun System
COMPUTATIONAL WORKSHEET
1. Vann number (identification) Field number (identification)
2. Irrigation system designation Existing irrigation system - New/expanded irrigation system
3. Number of travel lanes �_ # Interior lanes # Exterior lanes 6za feet] Length of.puli(L1)
# Interior lanes # Exterior lanes W-D [feet] Length of pull(L2)
# Interior lanes --q- # Exterior Ianes -S [feet] Length of pull(1-3)
4. Wetted diameter [feet] from Field Data Worksheet
5. Spacing Hydrant spacing [feet] [as a percentage of wetted diameter]
6. Hydrant layout ylultiple hydrants _ Single hydrant _ Excessively spaced hydrants
7. Read the irrigated area per travel pull for the given wetted diameter from the appropriate table and column
based on pattern, spacing, and travel lane location.
Travel lane length (L, Interior or Exterior (lane/hydrant)
�?- r (a) Acres start end of pull from Table i1 q o Column G'
2,1 (b) Acres middle portion of pull (L1)
(Pull length b.2 o [feet] X Wetted width !S �? [feet]! / 43,560
0 (c) Acres stop end of pull from Table to Column e
z `+3 Total acres for travel lane length (Ll) (Sum: a + b + c)
Travel lane length. (L, Interior or Exterior (lane/hydrant)
(a) Acres start end of pull from Table L 4o Column 13
(b) Acres middle portion of pull (L2)
(Pull length 1D [feet] X Wetted width 3 3 [feet]( / 43,560
O (c) Acres stop end of pull from Table It. Column C
1_:.69 Total acres for travel lane length (L2) (Sum: a + b + c)
Travel lane length (L, Interior or 9 Exterior (lane/hydrant)
.26 (a) Acres start end of pull from Table EF170 CO,= _ C�
1-oL (b) Acres middle portion of pull (1-3)
(Pull length AfS'[feet] X Wetted width /6`6 [feet]] 143,560
(c) Acres stop end of pull from Table I 'Column C
I . �- Total acres for travel lane length (1-3) (Sum: a + b + c)
8. Multiply the tabulated irrigated acreage value per travel pull by the number ref pulls of each
category in the field. Add all of these, and this is the total irrigated acreage for the field.
-2-LQ (a) Acres per travel lane length (L1)
X
# Lanes =
Acres
1 69 (b) Acres per travel lane length (L2)
X
# Lanes =
Acres
1.2P (c) Acres per travel lane length (1-3)
X
# Lanes =
Acres
�S ', 14 Total CAU-NfP wettable acres for field (Sum: 8a + 8b + 8c)
Wettable Acre Computational Worksheet Completed by: � ° u _ Date: r ".�-
Signature of technical specialist

(Mullfple worksheets may be needed)
HARD HOSE TRAVELER
IRRIGATION SYSTEM
Hard Hose Traveling Gun System
COMPUTATIONAL WORKSHEET
I. Farm number (identification) Field number (identification)
2. Irrigation system designation Existing irrigation system Newlexpanded irrigation system
3. Number of travel lanes # Interior lanes 10 # Exterior lanes -qfeet] Length of pull(LI)
11 # Interior lanes # Exterior lanes 49�, [feet] Length of pull(L2)
1� #Interior lanes 30
r Z - # Exterior Ianes `�3 j-? [feet] Length of pull(B)
4. Netted diameter [feet] from Field Data Worksheet
5. Spacing Hydrant spacing [feet] [as a percentage of wetted diameter]
6. Hydrant layout —""yfultiple hydrants Single hydrant Excessively spaced hydrants
7. Read the irrigated area per travel pull for the given wetted diameter from the appropriate table and column
based on pattern, spacing, and travel lane location.
Travel lane length (L, Interior or / b Exterior (lane/hydrant)
(a) Acres start end of pull from Tablet F 1 v Column
(b) Acres middle portion of pull (LI)
EPull length *`10 [feet] X Wetted width 1,TL [feet]; / 43,560
° (c) Acres stop end of pull from Table _ EF_ 9 O Column C
I.8 q Total acres for travel lane Iength (U) (Sum: a + b + c)
Travel lane length (L, _LL Interior or Exterior (lane/hydrant)
,15 (a) Acres start end of pull from Table _-FliQ Column C
1. 601 (b) Acres middle portion of pull (1-2)
{bull length WO [feet] X Wetted width 1�T3_ [feet]) / 43,560
(c) Acres stop end of pull from Table Column
Total acres for travel Iane length (L2) (Sum: a + b + c)
Travel lane length (L, ))- Interior or 1.2- Exterior (lane/hydrant) o.26X
0 -M (a) Acres start end of pull from Table UiO Column
1,65 1 (b) Acres middle _portion of pull (L3) a S�
.q Pull length__ [feet] X Netted width lz-m (feet]l / 43,560
D (c) Acres stop end of pull from Table �q� _ Column c
2,b Total acres for travel lane Iength (L3) (Sum: a + b + c)
8. Multiply the tabulated irrigated acreage value per travel pull by the number of pulls of each
category in the field. Add all of these, and this is the total irrigated acreage for the field,
Ste{ (a) Acres per travel lane length (L1)
X
#Lanes -
Acres
1.q4 (b) Acres per travel lane length (1-2)
X
# Lanes =
_ Acres
�65 (c) Acres per travel lane length (1-3)
X
# Lanes =
Acres
6,43 Total C.AZVVP wettable acres for field (Sum: 8a + 815 + 8c)
Wettable Acre Computational Worksheet Completed by: � ��� � n�� Date:
Signature of technical specialist
S�

(MuldF worksheets may be needed) HARD HOSE TRAVELER
IRRIGATION SYSTEM
Hard Hose Traveling Gun System
COMPUTATIONAL WORKSHEET
I. Farm number (identification) Field number (identification)
2. Irrigation system designation Existing irrigation system New/expanded irrigation system
3. Number of travel lanes # Interior lanes 13 # Exterior lanes J W feet] Length of pull(L1)
# Interior lanes # Exterior lanes [feet] Length of pull(L2)
# Interior lanes # Exterior lanes [feet] Length of pull(L3)
4. Wetted diameter j 2 b [feet] from Field Data Worksheet
S. Spacing Hydrant spacing [feet] [as a percentage of tti etted diameter]
6. Hydrant layout ---multiple hydrants Single hydrant Excessively spaced hydrants
7. Read the irrigated area per travel pull for the given wetted diameter from the appropriate table and column
based on pattern, spacing, and travel lane location.
Travel lane length (L, Interior or Jj_ Exterior (lane/hydrant)
,r (a) Acres start end of pull from Table CCU Rg Column V
1.30 (b) Acres middle portion of pull (L1)
(Pull length_')D [feet] X Netted width � 3_ [feet]! / 43,560
O (c) Acres stop end of pull from Table E-660 Column c
Total acres for travel lane length (LI) (Sum: a + b + c)
Travel lane length (L, Interior or Exterior (lane/hydrant)
(a) Acres start end of pull from Table Column
(b) Acres middle portion of pull (1-2)
{Pull length [feet] X Wetted width [feet]} /43,560
(c) Acres stop end of pull from Table Column
Total acres for travel lane length (1-2) (Sum: a + b + c)
Travel lane length (L, Interior or Exterior (lane/hydrant)
(a) Acres start end of pull from Table Column
(b) Acres middle portion of pull (1-3)
{Pull length [feet] X Wetted width (feet]} / 43,560
(c) .acres stop end of pull from Table Column
Total acres for travel lane length (L3) (Sum: a + b + c)
8. tilultiply the tabulated irrigated acreage value per travel pull by the number of pulls of each
category in the field. Add all of these, and this is the total irrigated acreage for the field.
I,Jf' (a) Acres per travel lane length (L1) X # Lanes = Acres
(b) Acres per travel lane length (L2) X # Lanes = Acres
(c) Acres per travel lane length (1-3) X # Lanes = Acres
i_JkTotal C.ktir-NfP wettable acmes for field (Sum: 8a + 8b + 8c)
Wettable .acre Computational 'Worksheet Completed by: ���:� Date:
Signature of technical specialist
IS'

Operator:HERSHEL JENKINS County: DUPLIN Date: 02/25/94
Distance to nearest residence (other than owner): -240-8:0 feet
1. STEADY STATE LIVE WEIGHT mt l�D
0 sows (farrow to finish) x 1417 lbs. = 0 lbs
0 sows (farrow to feeder) x 522 lbs. = 0 lbs
2640 head -(finishing only) x 135 lbs. - 356400 lbs.
0 sows (farrow to wean) x 433 lbs. = 0 lbs
0 head (wean to feeder) x 30 lbs. - 0 lbs
TOTAL STEADY STATE LIVE WEIGHT (SSLW) = 356400 lbs
2. MINIMUM REQUIRED TREATMENT VOLUME OF LAGOON
3.
4.
Volume = 356400 lbs. SSLW x Treatment Volume(CF)/lb. SSLW
Treatment Volume(CF)/lb. SSLW 1 CF/lb. SSLW
Volume = 356400 cubic feet
STORAGE VOLUME FOR SLUDGE ACCUMULATION
Volume = 0.0 cubic feet di G`r''``j7k4�"��'"�`� w��i
TV8
TOTAL DESIGN VOLUME
Inside top length 195.0 feet ; Inside top width 360.0 feet
Top of dike aZoR
ation 55.8 feet
Freeboard eet ; Side slopes 3.0 : 1 (Inside lagoon)
Total design liquid level at elevation 54.8 feet
Bottom of lagoon elevation 43.8 feet
Seasonal high water table elevation 48.0 feet
Total design volume using prismoidal formula
SS/END1 SS/END2 SS/SIDE1 SS/SIDE2 LENGTH WIDTH DEPTH
3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 189.0 354.0 11.00
AREA OF TOP
LENGTH * WIDTH =
189.0 354.0
AREA OF BOTTOM
LENGTH * WIDTH =
123.0 288.0
66906 (AREA OF TOP)
35424 (AREA OF BOTTOM)
AREA OF MIDSECTION
LENGTH * WIDTH * 4
156.0 321.0 200304 (AREA OF MIDSECTION * 4)
CU. FT. = A.AREA TOP + (4*AREA MIDSECTION) + AREA BOTTOMO * DEPTH/6
66906.0 200304.0 35424.0 1.
VOLUME OF LAGOON AT TOTAL DESIGN LIQUID LEVEL = 554829 CU. FT.

5. TEMPORARY STORAGE REQUIRED
DRAINAGE AREA:
Lagoon (top of dike)
Length * Width
195.0 360.0 70200.0 square feet
Buildings (roof and lot water)
Length * Width =
0.0 0.0 0.0 square feet
TOTAL DA 70200.0 square feet
Design temporary storage period to be 180 days.
5A. Volume of waste produced
Approximate daily production of manure in CF/LB SSLW 0.00136
Volume = 356400 Lbs. SSLW * CF of Waste/Lb./Day * 180 days
Volume = 87247 cubic feet
��. Volume of wash water
This is the amount of fresh water used for washing floors or volume
of fresh water used for a flush system. Flush systems that recirculate
the lagoon water are accounted for in 5A.
Volume 0.0 gallons/day * 180 days storage/7.48 gallons
per CF
Volume = 0.0 cubic feet
5C. Volume of rainfall in excess of evaporation
Use period of time when rainfall exceeds evaporation by largest amount
180 days excess rainfall = 7.0 inches
Volume = 7.0 in * DA / 12 inches per foot
Volume = 40950.0 cubic feet

5D. Volume of 25 year - 24 hour storm
Volume = 7.5 'riches / 12 inches per foot * DA
Volume = 43875.0 cubic feet
TOTAL REQUIRED TEMPORARY STORAGE
5A.
87247
cubic
feet
5B.
0
cubic
feet
5C.
40950
cubic
feet
5D.
43875
cubic
feet
TOTAL 172072 cubic feet
6. SUMMARY
Total required volume 528472 cubic feet
Total design volume avail. 554829 cubic feet
Min. req. treatment volume plus sludge accumulation
356400 cubic f,
At-elev. 51.9 feet ; Volume is 373631 cubic feet (end pumping)
Total design volume less 25yr-24hr storm is 510954 cubic feet
At elev. 54.0 feet ; Volume is 505561 cubic feet (start pumping
Seasonal high water table elevation 48.0 feet
7. DESIGNED BY -
APPROVED BY: r , 4?3 0
DATE: �` I� �I� DATE:
NOTE: SEE ATTACHED WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
COMMENTS:
SCS DDF.S_ NOT CERTIFY THAT
EXCAVATION_AND FILL VOLUMES
ARE CORRECT

NOV 10 59 02: a5PM
-
il " +inendment to Include S&WCC Chronic Rainfall Practices and Standards throQ-gh March 31,
1. If this facility can comply with its odsr:ag pamit and CAWMP it must do so.
!:' { 2. Temporary Addition of New SpraAcids (Check appropriate boxer.)
0 A. acres of cropland: List crop -types used;_--
"' B. aces of hardwood woodland 100 lbs PAN I acre added.
-�Y 1� •�, -- 0 (�
Q C. acres of pine woodland added @e 60 lbs PAN I acre adder
3. Summer Pcrezmial Cuass (Check appropriate box.)
A. Application windaw c=ded for acres of pa'enaial grass uatil first lolling frost.
. a An additi oval 50 lbs of PAN applied to. acres of perennial grass prior to hiRing frost.
4. PAN Applicatiaa Tncra9cd for Small Grains & Wiw= Grasses to be harvested. (Check appropriate box.)
PA. PAN application increased up to 200 lbs per acre for .acres of small grams or winter gasses to be hzrw4rcd.
1) B. PAST application incr=sed up to 150 lbs per acre for �. ages of overseedcd summer perennial included in 3. B.
: • ` $. Waste Analysis (Check appropriate box)
[] A Prior to December 1",1999 the calculation of PAN will be based on a 3 5% reducdotu of the last analysis tam
prior to the Srst 25 year 24 hour storm event, (Cutrew waste analysis must be used a$er Dec.11.)
RB. Use current waste analysis to determine PAN%
6. Required -Maximum Ntrogem.Utilization Measures far Small Grains and Wirt-r Caasszs.
A. Use of higher seeding rates,
B. "Timely harvest of forage to ina-ease yield, and
C. Irrigating during periods of warmer weather.
7. Reguired -Irrigation Management Tccbniques to Reduce -Rmoffand Poadiog Poteadal.
A. Malting frcqumt, light irriptim applications, mud
B. Not irrigating immediately before predicmd rainfall.
S. 'Ili_ owner I manager is required w manasre the mov== of animals to and from the facility to mmi„nfeaviromnantal
impacts, ensure compliance with tore iacdity's permit and, amended CAWN2, and avoid discharge to surfam Watas.
9. Amh r~izatim to use the additional pr...ctices included in this ameadrnent expires if a facility discharges to sur'`z= wags.
Any discharge is a violation and may result in as eaiorcemmt aim.
s[ -Y
1
10. The owner I operator is required to Ice= :-cords of a1 xNwt: applications.
11. This region must include a asap cr $i:ach of new land zn�61ication areas.
,'Facility Norma
L1L// "0,?D L • IAes a 04
Technical Specialist Name (PRJN17
1' l FacZliry O« oer I Mmager Sigizr�xre Technical Specialist signature
}ate / % /� �' i� Dam�-
t
1.
{ This document must be filed at the SW CD office and be attached to the facMU CAY MP
' and be available for inspection at the facility.
(*iN w t=pora-y samyfields must me:: applicable busies and setback requiremeam Vvasto must not be applied to wed=44.
is 11�7 �1lT.�0 -
Pscili*y Number 3 - 2-1
` . -
Facility Owna I _Man_gcrName (PRE T

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Wilmington Regional Office
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
Division of Water Quality
November 30, 1999
Mr. Herschel Jenkins
692 James Road
Wallace, NC 28466
1IMPFA
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOuRCES
Subject: Routine Inspection Form
Cypress Creek and Herschel Jenkins Farm
Facility Number. 31-274/31-379
Duplin County
Dear Mr. Jenkins:
Please find enclosed copies of the routine inspection forms for the Cypress Creek and
Herschel Jenkins Farms conducted on November 24, 1999, 1 was unable to leave a copy on site
at the time of the inspection. If you have any questions, please contact me at [phone].
Sincerely,
Brian L. Wrenn
Environmental Specialist
SAWQSIBRL4NMMISC131-204.LET
127 North Cardinal Dr., Wilmington, North Carolina 28405 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/101%, post -consumer paper
i

R=vistd Ap:i120, Z999
JUSTIFICATION & DOCUMENTATION FOR MANDATORY -WA DETERMINATION
Facility Number aL Operation is Tagged for a wettable
Farm Name: i r5 fr �S I-l►� _ acre determination due to failure of
On -Site Rep resentative:6kMA s� u 1`�j Pars It eligibility ifem{s) F1 F2 F3 F4
Inspector/Reviewer's Name: `
Date of site visit:
Date of most recent WUP: o�
Operation not required to secure WA -
determination at this ti based on
exemption E7 E2 I E E4
Operation pended for wettable acre
determination based on Pl P2 P3
Annual farm PAN deficit: 5 pounds
Irrigation System(s).- circ#e �-.1. turd-hose1raveier :center_pivot system; 3. linear -move system;
4. stationary sprinkler system w pemzanerit pipe; a. stationary sprinkler system wipbriable pipe;.
6. stationary gun system wlpemzanant pipe; 7. stationary gun :system wlporlable pipe
-PART i_ r'!n Determination Exemptions (Eligibiiilyfailure, Part II, overrides Part l exemption.)
El Adequate irrigation design, including map de.picung wettable acres, is complete
and signed by an I or PE.
E2 Adequate D, and DD3 irrigaiian operating parameter sheets, in -reap
depicting wattabie acres, is complete and signed by an I .or PE_
�3 Adequate D, iriUatiDn operating parameter sheer , including map depicting
wettable acres, is complete and signed by a WU _
=4 75% rule exemption as verified in Part III. (NOTE. -7b % exemption -cannot be
appFied to farms ii•:at fail the eiigibiiity checklist in Part If. Complete aiigibiliiy
checklist, :Part II - F1 F2 Fs3, betacomplering compirtatianaltable:in Fart I].[) -
PART 11.75% RuleEligib1iity.Chgckiist.andDocumentauon-o; WADeterrmina#ion -
Reouirements. _ WA -Determirauon required because :oprrauan tails mne ofthe eiigibiiitY
-equir ements iistedj3eilow:
'I 1ack�;�c agea�rhicn ..sr ddnave; nli iorx an;ast aie,_(P�4T�j -omspray-
neld(s)��arpinr�o' �arm�estiwa�ears�rrig�na�crn:ds-. .
F2 unclear,- Ilsgible�r lack of inionmiabonirran::-
F3 Obvinlls�elt�imiiionsnumernusxiitci�Y:rlvr�dirctgriirLd� .
bunerlseibacic�crage�r�6a i�I�creagedeiie��riAWN1Pinciirri=s _-
smelt,-srrag111arly�i��apeda�alds=?ldsds:an�cresorvrlar�rjess-t-,an
2 acresinrstaboraryzprinklers)_
F4 WA aarermrra ionnquiredb--cause CAWMr?.-crariits_j-1eld(s)'s acreage -in -excess
cf, 76%a or the respective -field's total acreage as noted in -able in Fart III.

. R--. istd Ap�12D, ? oog
Facili#y Humber
Part Ill. Field by Field Determination of 75% Exemption Rule for WA Determination .
TRACT
FIELD
TYPE of
TOTAL
CAWMP
FIELD
COMMENTS;
NUMBER
NUNIBER7-2
UMGATlDN-
ACRES
ACRES".
%
SYSTEM
ri-! D-NUMBER'- hYd" u ,zona. Orpns nutr rs ay Ye* used.m place -or ztatd.nurnbem-dapeenaing on CAWMP
and types of Mgabon•systeem.-- F puls,=ai c: crDss-inoretr+an -one held,:kMDeciorirL-ri-_wer w611 have to combina.-h-0ds iD
calculam-75%—fiekd.by-fi-eid Q--L-rrninauon-ior-exemFmDrr,-otherwiSe Dp¢7aIiDn vAl be sui ie&L to Wkcietermba ori.
F NUMBS-Tnusi se=_ariy.:deiineated nnmrrp.
::0MMEKTS'-ha=k-3ip crFrstcitaL-d=sendtiavingTesc ivedies-st-an-5D%
:rits annua!PAN:aS:IjD rrteri-in7tneiEirm"s rrAviols:iwoyeam'-(3a57&1996)�ofjrncannnn�s;x:annoi�erva�s�
ioiabasis�b j ntirrmga v1iA�-�tmrranar a:.ti tds,Inc:st x�D dm n8:.cmmerrtsa�an nc[ •s' w. m�e
)y hTiscafion S}'SiaTll.'
'art 1V_.Plending WAD-etermira o s
Pj -Pian Jacksj6Ilowingjnfformamon:
P2 PtanTevisian-may-safs75%-rule-basad onmciequate-overafi -PAN deficitand:b
aolusnngali:iield3craage:btaiow75% use -jute
r3 Dthav(iahn process of installing new irrigation s stem):

Revised Apnfi 20,1999
JUSTIFICATION & DOCUMENTATION FOR MANDATORY WA DETERMINATION
Facility Number -St_-7n4_ Operation is flagged for a wettable
Farm Name: C,iSS ( k lam acre determination due to failure of
On -Site Representaflve: Nc.rs, &k l kL1C•, , Part 11 eligibility item(s) Ft F2 F3 F4
Inspector/Reviewer's Name: r
Date of site visit:_ IqQ
Date of most recent WUP: z q�
Annual farm PAN deficit: og4p.s pounds
Operation not required to secure WA
determination at this ti e based on
exemption -El E2 E E4
Operation pended for wettable acre
determination based on P1 P2 P3
Irrigation System(s) - circle #: 1. hard -hose traveler; 2: center -pivot system; 3. linear -move system;
4. stationary sprinkler system wlpermanent pipe; 5. stationary sprinkler system wlportble pipe;
6. stationary gun system wlpermanent pipe; 7. stationary gun system wlportable pipe
PART 1. WA Determination Exemptions (Eligibility failure, Part 11, overrides Par [ Exemption.)
E1 Adequate irrigation design, including map depicting wettable acres, is complete
and signed by an I or PE.
E2 Adequate D, and D�D, irrigation operating parameter sheets, including map
depicting wettable acres, is complete and signed by an I or PE.
✓ E3 Adequate D, irrigation operating parameter sheet, including map depicting
wettable acres, is complete and signed by a WUP.
E4 75% n Ile exemption as verified in Part II1. (NOTE:75 % exemption cannot be
applied to farms that fail the eligibility checkfist in Part 11. Complete eligibility
checklist, Part 11- F1 F2 F3, before completing computational table in Part 111).
PART 11. 75% Rule.Elicibility Checklist and Documentation of WA Determination
Requirements. WA Determination required .because operation fails one of the .eligibility
requirements listed below:
_ F1 Lack of acreagewhichTesuitedln:overmppiicationmfmastewateE(PAN) on:spray.
field(s) according-tofarm'siast two -years mfimg2tion3ecords.-.
F2 UndEarjilegible,-or lack of informatonlmap.
F3 Obvious -field -limitations-(numerous�ditches;dai€ureto:deductTequired.—
bufferlsetback-acrease;-or25%:ofIota] :acreageidertmedln7.CAWMP includes
small;-irregularly-shaped.fields=fields:less-than -5-acres-for..#rave€ers-or.lessthan
2 acres -for stationary -sprinklers).
F4 WA determination required because CAWMP credits field(s)'s acreage in excess

Revised April 20, 1999
Facility Number -
Part Ill. Field by Field Determination of 75% Exemption Rule for WA Determination
TRACT
NUMBER
FIELD
NUMBER'-2
TYPE OF TOTAL CAWMP FIELD
IRRIGATION ACRES ACRES %
SYSTEM
COMMENTS3
I
'FIELD NUMBER' - hydrant, pull, zone, o r.po int numb ers. may be used in place of field numbers depending on CAWMP
and type of irrigation system. If pulls, etc. cross more than one field, inspectodreviewer will have to combine fe!ds to
calculate 75% field by field determination for exemption; -otherwise operation will be subject to WA d ermination.
FIELD NUMEERZ - must be clearly delineated on map.
COMMENTS' - back-up fields with CAWMP acreage:exceeding75% of its totcl.acres-and havinCTeceived less than 50%
of its annual PAN as documented in the farm's previous two years' (1 °97 & 1998) of irrigation Teccrds, cannot serve as the
sole basisfor requiring a VIA Determination._Eack-up fieldsTnust,be-noted in the -comment -section, and must be accessible
by irrigation system.
Part IV. Pending WA Determinations -
Pi Plan -.lacks.foilowina-information:
P2 Plan revision maysEbsfy-75% rule based on adequate overGil PAN deticit-2nd by
adjusting all field -acreage-to below 75% use rate
P3 Other (ielin process of installing new irrigation system):
t

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
October 5, 1998
T ]w
IT - - V_T
1 � •
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
Herschel Jenkins
Cypress Creek Farm IRE C E 1 V IEI) OCT 0 7 1998
692 James Rd
Wallace NC 28466
Subject: Certificate of Coverage No. AWS310274
Cypress Creek Farm
Swine Waste Collection, Treatment,
Storage and Application System
Duplin County
Dear Herschel Jenkins:
In accordance with your application received on September 9, 1998, we are forwarding this
Certificate of Coverage (COC) issued to Herschel Jenkins, authorizing the operation of the subject
animal waste collection, treatment, storage and land application system in accordance with General
Permit AWG100000. This approval shall consist of the operation of this system including, but not
limited to, the management of animal waste from the Cypress Creek Farm, located in Duplin County,
with an animal capacity of no greater than 2640 Feeder to Finish and the application to land as specified
in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP).
The COC shall be effective from the date of issuance until April 30, 2003. Pursuant to this COC,
you are authorized and required to operate the system in conformity with the conditions and limitations
as specified in the General Permit, the facility's CAWMP, and this COC, with no discharge of wastes to
surface waters. An adequate system for collecting and maintaining the required monitoring data and
operational information must be established for this farm. Any increase in waste production greater than
the certified design capacity or increase in number of stocked animals above the number authorized by
this COC will require a modification to the CAWMP and this COC and shall be completed prior to
actual increase in either wastewater flow or number of animals.
Please be advised that any violation of the terms and conditions specified in this COC, the General
Permit or the CAWMP may result in the revocation of this COC, or penalties in accordance with NCGS
143-215.6A through 143-215.6C including civil penalties, criminal penalties, and injunctive relief.
Upon notification by the Division of this COC's expiration, you shall apply for its renewal. This
request shall be made within 30 days of notification by the Division.
This COC is not automatically transferable. A name/ownership change application must be
submitted to the DWQ prior to a name change or change in ownership.
If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this COC are unacceptable, you have the
right to apply for an individual non -discharge permit by contacting the engineer listed below for
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled110% post -consumer paper

Certificate of Coverage AWS310274
Cypress Creek Farm �-.._ .,..-,.� ..�..
Page 2
information on this process. Unless such a request is made within 30 days, this COC shall be final and
binding. - The subject farm is located in the Wilmington Regional Office. The Regional Office Water
Quality Staff may be reached at [phone]. If you need additional information concerning this
COC or the General Permit, please contact J R Joshi at [phone] ext. 363.
J11LC1G1 L
• � l
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E.
cc: (Certificate of Coverage only for all cc's)
Duplin County Health Department
Wilmington Regional Office, Water Quality Section
Duplin County Soil and Water Conservation District
Permit File -Central Files
Permit File-NDPU

31-Z7�%c
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment and Natural Resources R EC �I
Division of Water Quality LIVAT ER 0 � �
Non -Discharge Permit Application Form
(THIS FORM MAY BE PHOTOCOPIED FOR USE AS AN ORIGINAL) Sip 0 9,998
General Permit - Existing Liquid Animal Waste Operations
hlblq_ iseharaq P.errrr., -
The following questions have been completed utilizing information on file with the Division. Please
review the information for completeness and make any corrections which are appropriate. If a
question has not been completed by the Division, please complete as best as possible. Do not leave
any question unanswered.
1. GENERAL INFORMATION:
1.1 Facility Name: Cypress Creek Farm
1.2 Print Land Owner's name: Herschel Jenkins
1.3 Mailing address: 692 James Rd
City, State: Wallace NC
Telephone Number (include area code): 285-2403
Zip: 28466
1.4 County where facility is located: Duplin
1.5 Facility Location (Directions from nearest major highway. Please include SR numbers for state roads. Please include a
copy of a county road map with the location of the farm identified): Take Hwy 53 north from 1-40. Turn left on to NC
Hwy 50 north. Turn right on to SR 1526. Road becomes SR 1828 in Duplin County. At Cypress Creek turn right on to
SR 1826. Farm is approx 1 mile on northwest side
1.6 Print Farm Manager's name (if different from Land Owner):
1.7 Lessee's / Integrator's name (if applicable; please circle which type is listed): Carroll's Foods Inc
1.8 Date Facility Originally Began Operation: 06/09/94
1.9 Date(s) of Facility Expansion(s) (if applicable):
2. OPERATION INFORMATION:
2.1 Facility No.: _31_ (county number); _274 (facility number).
2.2 Operation Description: Swine operation
Feeder to Finish
2640- Certified Design Capacity
Is the above information correct? [Kyes; no. If no, correct below using the design capacity of the facility
m The "No. of Animals" should be the maximum nuer or which the waste management structures were designed.
Type of Swine No. of Animals Type of Poultry No. of Animals Type of Cattle No. of Animals
0 Wean to Feeder 0 Layer 0 Dairy
0 Feeder to Finish 0 Non -Layer 0 Beef
0 Farrow to Wean (# sow) 0 Turkey
0 Farrow to Feeder {# sow)
0 Farrow to Finish (# sow)
Other Type of Livestock on the farm: No. of Animals:
FORM: AWO-G-E 5/28/98 Page 1 of 4 31 - 274

If
2.3 Acreage cleared and available for application (excluding all required buffers and areas not covered by the application
system): 27.80 ; Required Acreage (as listed in the AWMP): --224 r- 3, cl
2.4 Number o lagoon storage ponds (circle which is applicable):
2.5 Are subsurface drains present within 100' of any of the application fields? YES or NO (please circle one)
2.6 Are subsurface drains present in the vicinity or under the lagoon(s)? YES or 0 (please circle one)
2.7 Does this facility meet all applicable siting requirements? (Swine Farm Siting Act, NRCS Standards, etc.) (Swine Only)
0 or NO (please circle one)
What was the date that this facility's swine houses and lagoon were sited? f 6 ri 4
What was the date that this facility's land application areas were sited? I b -Ci +
3. REQUIRED ITEMS CHECKLIST
Please indicate that you have included the following required items by signing your initials in the space provided next to each
item.
Applicants Initials
3.1 One completed and signed original and one copy of the application for General Permit - Animal
Waste Operations;
3.2 Two copies of a general location map indicating the location of the animal waste facilities and
field locations where animal waste is land applied;
3.3 Two copies of the entire Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP). If the facility
does not have a CAWMP, it must be completed prior to submittal of a general permit
application for animal waste operations.
The CAWMP must include the following components:
,/ 3.3.1 The Waste Utilization Plan (WUP) must include the amount of Plant Available
Nitrogen (PAN) produced and utilized by the facility.
3.3.2 The method by which waste is applied to the disposal fields (e.g. irrigation,
injection, etc.)
3.3.3 A map of every field used for land application.
3.3.4 The soil series present on every land application field.
3.3.5 The crops grown on every land application field.
3.3.6 The Realistic Yield Expectation (RYE) for every crop shown in the WUP.
3.3.7 The PAN applied to every land application field.
3.3.8 The waste application windows for every crop utilized in the WUP.
3.3.9 The required MRCS Standard specifications.
3.3.10 A site schematic.
3.3.11 Emergency Action Plan.
3.3.12 Insect Control Checklist with chosen best management practices noted.
3.3.13 Odor Control Checklist with chosen best management practices noted.
3.3. l4 Mortality Control Checklist with the selected method noted.
3.3.15 Lagoon/storage pond capacity documentation (design, calculations, etc.). Please be
sure to include any site evaluations, wetland determinations, or hazard classifications
that may be applicable to your facility.
3.3.16 Operation and Maintenance Plan.
If your CAWMP includes any components not shown on this list, please include the
additional components with your submittal.
FORM: AWO-G-E 5/28/98 Page 2 of 4 31 - 274

RECEI4i�D
VEtr',E�R{3'Jr'iiT' arEGTf0N
Facility Number. 31 - 274
13FP 0 91998
- Facility Name: Cypress Creek Farm Mort Djsc,3args Permjtling
4. APPLICANT'S CERTIFICATION:
5 r 5 C_ 1 C,1 _ 1A ki n.r � _ (Land Owner's name listed in question 1.2), attest that
this application for CN prau Creek Far (Facility name listed in question 1.1)
has been reviewed by me ang is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that if all required parts of this
application are not completed and that if all required supporting information and attachments are not included, this application
package will be returned to me as incomplete.
Signature
Date 9 — p-- qX_
5. MANAGER'S CERTIFICATION: (complete only if different from the Land Owner)
Ll
(Manager's name listed in question 1.6), attest that this
application for (Facility name listed in question 1.1)
has been reviewed by me and is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that if all required parts o`this
application are not completed and that if all required supporting information and attachments are not included, this application
package will be returned as incomplete.
Signature
Date
THE COMPLETED APPLICATION PACKAGE, INCLUDING ALL SUPPORTING INFORMATION AND MATERIALS,
SHOULD BE SENT TO THE FOLLOWING ADDRESS:
NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
WATER QUALITY SECTION
NON -DISCHARGE PERMITTING UNIT
POST OFFICE BOX 29535
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27626-0535
TELEPHONE NUMBER: [phone]
FAX NUMBER: [phone]
FORM: AWO-G-E 5/28/98 Page 3 of 4 31 - 274

DWISION OF WATER QUALITY REGIONAL OFFICES (IM)
Achcvilk Regional WQ Supervisor
59 Woodfin Place
Asheville, NC 28801
(704) 2.51-6208
Fax [phone]
Avery Macon
Buncombe Madison
Burke McDowell
Caldwell Mitchell
[$ex+okae Polk
Clav Rudmford .
Graham Swain
Haywood Transylvania
Henderson Yancey
Jackson
Fayetteville Regional WQ Supervisor
Wachovia Building, Suite 714
Fayetteville, NC 28301
(910) 48&1541
Fax [phone]
Washington Regional WQ Supervisor
943 Washington Square Mall
Washington, NC 27889
[phone]
Fax [phone]
Beaufort
Jones
Berde
Camden
Lenoir
Martin
CUMM
Craven
Pamlico
Pasgnotank
Crarituck
Prxquimpus
Dare
Pitt
Gates
Tyreil
Ortme
Washington.
Hertford
Wayne
Hyde
Mooresville Regional WQ Supervisor
919 North Main Suva
Mooresville, NC 28115
[phone]
Fax [phone]
Raleigh Regional WQ Supavisor
38M Bazz Dr.
Raleigh, NC 27611
(919) 571-47W
lFax. [phone]
Cbaffi-n Nash
Durham Northampton
Edgecambe Orange
Franklin Person
Granville Vance
Johnston Wamm
Lee Wilson
Wilmington Region. WQ Supervisor
127 Cardinal Drive Extension
Wilmington, NC 28405-3845
[phone]
Fax [phone]
Anson Moore . Alexander UnwIn Brunswick New Hanover
Blades Richmond Caharrus Medkkaburg Csrtaet Onslow
Cumberland Robeson Catawba Rowan Columbus P nder
Harnett Sampson Ckaveland Stanly Dq)lin
Hoke Scodand Gaston - Union
Montgomery kedeil
Winston-Salem Regional WQ Supervisor
555 waughuis-1 Sumer
Winston-Salem, NC 27107
(910) 7714600
Fax [phone]
Alamance Rocibngham
Alleghany Randolph
Ashe Stokes
Caswell Sutry
Davidson Watauga
Davie Wilkes
Forsyth Yadidn
Guilford
FORM: AWO-GE 5/28198 Page 4 of 4

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
Producer: HERSCHEL JENKINS
Location: 692 JAMES RD
WALLACE NC 28466
Telephone: [phone]
Type Operation: New Feeder to Finish Swine
Number of Animals: 2640.00 hogs
(Design Capacity)
STORAGE STRUCTURE: Anaerobic Waste Treatment Lagoon
APPLICATION METHOD: Irrigation
The waste from your animal facility must be land applied at a
specified rate to prevent pollution of surface water and/or
groundwater. The plant nutrients in the animal waste should be used
to reduce the amount of commercial fertilizer required for the crops
in the fields where the waste is to be applied.
This waste utilization plan uses nitrogen as the limiting nutrient.
Waste should be analyzed before each application cycle. Annual soil
tests are strongly encouraged so that all plant nutrients can be
balanced for realistic yields of the crop to be grown_
Several factors are important in implementing your waste utilization
plan in order to maximize the fertilizer value of the waste and to
ensure that it is applied in an environmentally safe manner:
1. Always apply waste based on the needs of the crop to be
grown and the nutrient content of the waste. Do not apply
more nitrogen than the crop can utilize.
2. Soil types are important as they have different infiltration
rates, leaching potentials, cation exchange capacities, and
available water holding capacities.
3. Normally waste shall be applied to land eroding at less than
5 tons per acre per year. Waste may be applied to land
eroding at 5 or more tons per acre annually, but less than
10 tons per acre per year providing that adequate filter
strips are established.
4. Do not apply waste on saturated soils, when it is raining,
v
or when the surface is frozen. Either of these conditions
may result in runoff to surface waters which is not.allowed
under DWQ regulations.
Page: 1

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
S. Wind conditions should also be considered to avoid drift and
• downwind odor problems.
6. To maximize the value of the nutrients for crop production
and to reduce the potential for pollution, the waste should
be applied to a growing crop or applied not more than 30
days prior to planting a crop or forages breaking dormancy.
Injecting the waste or disking will conserve nutrients and
reduce odor problems.
This plan is based on the waste application method shown above. If
you choose to change methods in the future, you need to revise this
plan. Nutrient levels for different application methods are not the
same.
The estimated acres needed to apply the animal waste is based on
typical nutrient content for this type of facility. Acreage
requirements should be based on the waste analysis report from your
waste management facility. In some cases you may want to have plant
analysis made, which could allow additional waste to be applied.
Provisions shall be made for the area receiving waste to be flexible
so as to accommodate changing waste analysis content and crop type.
Lime must be applied to maintain pH in the optimum range for specific
crop production.
This waste utilization plan, if carried out, meets the requirements
for compliance with 15A NCAC 2H .0217 adopted by the Environmental
Management Commission.
AMOUNT OF WASTE PRODUCED PER YEAR (gallons, ft3, tons, etc.)
2640 hogs x 1.9 tons waste/hogs/year = 5016 tons
AMOUNT OF PLANT AVAILABLE NITROGEN (PAN) PRODUCED PER YEAR
2640 hogs x 2.3 lbs PAN/hogs/year = 6072 lbs. PAN/year
Applying the above amount of waste is a big job. You should plan
time and have appropriate equipment to apply the waste in a timely
manner.
The following acreage will be needed for waste application based on
the crop to be grown, soil type and surface application.
Page: 2

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
TABLE 1: ACRES OWNED BY PRODUCER
TRACT
Fes$
SOIL TYPE & CLASS-
CROP
YIELD
LBS
COMM N
**
* LBS
DETERMINING PHASE
CODE
AW N
PER
ACRES
AW N
PER AC
AC
USED
-----
or.
-------
APPLY
RESID.
APPLIC
METH
N
TIME
7455
1
AUB
BH
5.5
275
3.4
935
I
APR-SEP
7455
1
7455
2
7455
--2
­d
7455
F
7455
--3
7455
4
7455
-4
7455
5
7455
-5
■it
ae:
I •:
NOB
END
G
I
11
I50
I 13.4
1170
SEP-APR
BH
5.5
275
3.2
I
1880
APR-SEP
SG
1
I
1-50
13.2
1160
SEP-APR
BH
6.1
1189.5
IAPR-SEP
1305
1 13..9
SG
1
I
ISO
1 13_9
1195
SEP-APR
BH
I
16.1
1305 1
12.9
1884.5
APR-SEP
SG
1
I
150 1
12.9--rl-45
EP-APR
BH
6.1
I
1305
1
11.4 1427
APR-SEP
SG
1
150 1
11.4
170
I
SEP-APR
I
- Indicates that this field is being overseeded (i.e.
interplanted) or winter annuals follow summer annuals.
TOTAL15056
Page: 3

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
NOTE: The applicator is cautioned that P and K may be over applied
while meeting the N requirements. in the future, regulations
may require farmers in some parts of North Carolina to have a
nutrient management plan that addresses all nutrients. This
plan only addresses nitrogen.
Page: 4

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
TABLE 2: ACRES WITH NOTARIZED AGREEMENT OR LONG TERM LEASE
(Agreement with adjacent landowners must be attached.)
(Required only if operator does not own adequate land.
See required specification 2.)
TRACT
FHB
SOIL TYPE & CLASS-
CROP
YIELD
LBS
COMM.N
**
* LBS
P1111
DETERMINING PHASE
CODE
AW N
PER
ACRES
AW N
PER AC
AC
USED
-----
or
-------
APPLY
RESID.
APPLIC
METH
N
TIME
4859
6
NOB
C
100
105
20
2.2
231
MAR--JUN
4859
j
1-6
INOB
IW
155
1110
12.2
1242OCTMAR
4859
7
NOB
IC
1100
1105 120
11.6
1168
MAR-JUN
4859
NOB
W
1-7
I
155
1110
11.6
1176
OCT--MAR
4859
8
NOB
IC
1100
1105 120
13.4
1357
MAR-JUN
4859
�8
NOS
W
155
�110
13-4
1374
OCT-MAR
4859
9
NOB
C
1.9
199.5
1100
1105 120
MAR - Jt7N
4859
NOB
W
1-9
�55 1110
1 11.9
1209
OCT-MAR
END
TOTAL11956.5
Indicates that this field is being overseeded (i.e. interplanted) or
winter annuals follow summer annuals.
In interplanted fields (i.e. small grain, etc, interseeded
in bermudagrass), forage must be removed through grazing,
hay and/or silage. Where grazing, plants should be grazed
when they reach a height of six to nine inches. Cattle
Page: 5

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
should be removed when plants are grazed to a height of four
inches. In fields where small grain, etc, is to be removed
for hay or silage, care should be exercised not to let small
grain to reach maturity, especially late in the season (i.e.
April or May). Shading may result if small grain gets too
high and this will definitely interfere with stand of
bermudagrass. This loss of stand will result in reduced
yields and less nitrogen being utilized. Rather than
cutting small grain for hay or silage just before heading as
is the normal situation, you are encouraged to cut the small
grain earlier. You may want to consider harvesting hay or
silage two to three times during the season, depending on
time - small grain is planted in - the fall.
The ideal time to interplant small grain, etc, is late
September or early October. Drilling is recommended over
broadcasting. Bermudagrass should be grazed or mowed to a
height of about two inches before drilling for best results.
** Acreage figures may exceed total acreage in fields due to
overseeding.
* lbs AW N (animal waste nitrogen) equals total required nitrogen
less any commercial nitrogen (COMM N) supplied.
The following legend -explains the crop codes used in tables 1 and 2 above:
CROP CODE
CROP
UNITS
PER UNIT
BH
HYBRID BERMUDAGRASS-HAY
TONS
50
C
CORN
BUSHELS
1.25
SG
SMALL GRAIN OVERSEEDED
AC
5o
W
WHEAT
BUSHELS
2
TABLE 1
TOTALS FROM TABLES 1 AND 2
WETTABLE
_ACRES_
14_S
LBS AW N USED
5056
TABLE 2 1 9.1 1 1956.5
Page: 6

t.
ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
TOTAL 1 23.9 1 7012.5
*** BALANCE 1 -940.5
-------------------
*** This number must be less than or equal to 0 in order to
fully utilize the animal waste N produced.
Page: 7

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
*** This number must be less than or equal to 0 in order to fully
utilize the animal waste N produced.
Acres shown in each of the preceding tables are considered to be the
usable acres excluding required buffers, filter strips along ditches,
odd areas unable to be irrigated, and perimeter areas not receiving
full application rates due to equipment limitations. Actual total
acres in the fields listed may, and most likely will be, more than
the acres shown in the tables.
See attached map showing the fields to be used for the utilization of
animal waste.
SLUDGE APPLICATION:
The waste utilization plan must contain provisions for periodic land
application of sludge at agronomic rates. The sludge will be nutrient
rich and will require precautionary measures to prevent over application
of nutrients or other elements. Your production facility will produce
approximately 976.8 pounds of plant available nitrogen per year in the
sludge.
If you remove the sludge every 5 years, you will have approximately 4884
pounds of PAN to utilize. Assuming you apply this PAN to hybrid
bermudagrass hayland at the rate of 300 pounds of nitrogen per acre, you
will need 16.28 acres of land. If you apply the sludge to corn at
the rate of 125 pounds of nitrogen per acre, you will need 39.072 acres
of land. Please be aware that these are only estimates of the -PAN and
land needed. Actual requirements could vary by 25% depending on•your
sludge waste analysis, soil types, realistic yields, and application
methods.
APPLICATION OF WASTE BY IRRIGATION
The irrigation application rate should not exceed the intake rate of the
soil at the time of irrigation such that runoff or ponding occurs. This
rate is limited by initial soil moisture content, soil structure, soil
texture, water droplet size, and organic solids. The application amount
should not exceed the available water holding capacity of the soil at the
time of irrigation nor should the plant available nitrogen applied exceed
the nitrogen needs of the crop.
If surface.irrigation is the method of land application for this plan,
it is the responsibility of the producer and irrigation designer to ensure
that an irrigation system is installed to properly irrigate the acres
shown in Tables 1 and 2. Failure to apply the recommended rates and
Page: 8

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
amounts of nitrogen shown in the tables may make this plan invalid.
The following table is provided as a guide for establishing application
rates and amounts.
Tract
I
J
I Soil Type
P,
I
4859
J 6
l NOB
4859 17
1
I NOB
I
4859 l
8
l NOB
4859 l
9
I NOB
4859 l
--6
l NOB
I
4859 J
-7
I NOB
I
4859 J
I
-8
i NOB
4859 l
I
-9
l NOB
7455 l
1
l AUB
7455 l
2
I
I AUB
I
(Application
RatelApplic. Amount
I Crop
l
I (in/hr)
I
I (inches)
I
J C
i .50
l *1.0
J C
J .50
I
I *1.0
I
J C
I
l .50
l *1.0
l C
l .50
l *1.0
I
j W
I
I .50
i
I *1.0
I
W
I
I -50
l *1.0
J W
l .50
J *1.0
W
I .50
i *1.0
!
BH
I
I .5
I
I *1
I
I BH
I
I .5
l
l *1
Page: 9

1. ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
7455
f 3
f
7455
4
I
7455
f 5
f
7455
I ,-1
I
7455
--2
7455
I -3
7455
f -4
7455 I -5
1
_1
f NOB
f BH
f
_f
NOB
I BH
I
_I
NOB
I BH
SG
SG
SG
SG
SG
.50
1
f .50
f
f .50
*1.0
.5
f
f *1
I
•5
I
I *1
f .5
I
I *1
•5
1 *1
f
f •5
I *1
* This is the maximum application amount allowed for the soil
assuming the amount of nitrogen allowed for the crop is not over
applied. In many situations, the application amount shown cannot
be applied because of the nitrogen limitation. The maximum
application amount shown can be applied under optimum soil
conditions.
Your facility is designed for 180.00 days of temporary storage and
the temporary storage must be removed on the average of once every
6.00 months. In no instance should the volume of the waste be stored
in your structure be within the 25 year 24 hour storm storage or one
foot of freeboard except in the event of the 25 year 24 hour storm.
Page: 10

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
It is the responsibility of the producer and waste applicator to
ensure that the spreader equipment is operated properly to apply the
correct rates to the acres shown in Tables 1 and 2. Failure to apply
the recommended rates and amounts of nitrogen shown in the tables may
make this plan invalid.
Call your technical specialist after you receive the waste analysis
report for assistance in determining the amount of waste per acre and
the proper application rate prior to applying the waste.
NARRATIVE OF OPERATION
THIS PLAN IS BASED ON HYDRANT PULLS SHOWN ON THE ATTACHED MAP.
Page: 11

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
1. Animal waste shall not reach surface waters of the state by
runoff, drift, manmade conveyances, direct application, or
direct discharge during operation or land application. Any
discharge of waste which reaches surface water is prohibited.
2. There must be documentation in the design folder that the
producer either owns or has an agreement for use of adequate
land on which to properly apply the waste. If the producer does
not own adequate land to properly dispose of waste, he/she shall
provide a copy of an agreement with a landowner who is within a
reasonable proximity, allowing him/her the use of the land for
waste application. It is the responsibility of the owner of the
facility to secure an update of the Waste Utilization Plan when
there is a change in the operation, increase in the number of
animals, method of utilization, or available land.
3. Animal waste shall be applied to meet, but not exceed, the
nitrogen needs for realistic crop yields based on soil type,
available moisture, historical data, climatic conditions, and
level of management, unless there are regulations that restrict
the rate of application for other nutrients.
4. Animal waste shall be applied to land eroding less than 5 tons
per acre per year.. Waste may be applied to land that is eroding
at 5 or more tons, but less than 10 tons per acre per year
providing grass filter strips are installed where runoff leaves
the field. (See FOTG Standard 393 -Filter Strip)
5. Odors can be reduced by injecting the waste or disking after
waste application. Waste should not be applied when there is
danger of drift from the irrigation field.
6. When animal waste is to be applied on acres subject to
flooding, it will be soil incorporated on conventionally tilled
cropland. When applied to conservation tilled crops or
grassland, the waste may be broadcast provided the application
does not occur during a season prone to flooding. (See "Weather
and Climate in North Carolina" for guidance.)
7. Liquid waste shall be applied at rates not to exceed the soil
infiltration rate such that runoff does not occur offsite or to
surface waters and in a method which does not cause drift from
the site during application. No ponding should occur in order
to control odor or flies.
8. Animal waste shall not be applied to saturated soils, during
rainfall events, or when the surface is frozen.
9. Animal waste shall be applied on actively growing crops in such
a manner that the crop is not covered with waste to a depth that
would inhibit growth. The potential for salt damage from animal
waste should also be considered.
Page: 12

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
10. Waste nutrients shall not be applied in fall or winter for
spring planted crops on soils with a high potential for
leaching. Waste nutrient loading rates on these soils should be
held to a minimum and a suitable winter cover crop planted to
take up released nutrients. Waste shall not be applied more
than 30 days prior to planting of the crop or forages breaking
dormancy.
11. Any new swine facility sited on or after October 1, 1995 shall
comply with the following: The outer perimeter of the land area
onto which waste is applied from a lagoon that is a component of
a swine farm shall be at least 50 feet from any residential
property boundary and from any perennial stream or river (other
than an irrigation ditch or canal. Animal waste other than
swine waste from facilities sited on or after October 1, 1995),
shall not be applied closer than 25 feet to perennial waters.
(See Standard 393 - Filter Strips).
12. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 100 feet to
wells.
13. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 200 feet of
dwellings other than those owned by the landowner.
14. Waste shall be applied in a manner not to reach other property
and public right-of-ways.
15. Animal waste shall not be discharged into surface waters,
drainageways, or wetlands by a discharge or by over -spraying.
Animal waste may be applied to prior converted cropland provided
they have been approved as a land application site by a
"technical specialist". Animal waste shall not be applied on
grassed waterways that discharges directly into water courses,
and on other grassed waterways, waste shall be applied at
agronomic rates in a manner that causes no runoff or drift from
the site.
16. Domestic and industrial waste from washdown facilities,
showers, toilets, sinks, etc., shall not be discharged into the
animal waste management system.
17. A protective cover of appropriate vegetation will be
established on all disturbed areas (lagoon embankments, berms,
pipe runs, etc.). Areas shall be fenced, as necessary, to
protect the vegetation. Vegetation such as trees, shrubs, and
other woody species, etc., are limited to areas where considered
appropriate. Lagoon areas should be kept mowed and accessible.
Berms and structures should be inspected regularly for evidence
of erosion, leakage or discharge.
Page: 13

WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS
18. If animal production at the facility is to be suspended or
terminated, the owner is responsible for obtaining and
implementing a "closure plan" which will eliminate the
possibility of an illegal discharge, pollution and erosion.
19. Waste handling structures, piping, pumps, reels, etc., should
be inspected on a regular basis to prevent breakdowns, leaks,
and spills. A regular maintenance checklist should be kept on
site.
20. Animal waste can be used in a rotation that includes vegetables
and other crops for direct human consumption. However, if
animal waste is used on crops for direct human consumption it
should only be applied preplant with no further applications of
animal waste during the crop season.
21. Highly visible markers shall be installed to mark the top and
bottom elevations of the temporary storage (pumping volume) of
all waste treatment lagoons. Pumping shall be managed to
maintain the liquid level between the markers. A marker will
be required to mark the maximum storage volume for waste
storage ponds.
22. Waste shall be tested within 60 days of utilization and soil
shall be tested at least annually at crop sites where waste
products are applied. Nitrogen shall be the rate - determining
element. Zinc and copper levels in the soils shall be
monitored and alternative crop sites shall be used when these
metals approach excessive levels. pH shall be adjusted for
optimum crop production and maintained. Soil and waste
• analysis records shall be kept for five years. Poultry dry
waste application records shall be maintained for three (3)
years. Waste application records for all other waste shall be
maintained for five (5) years:
23. Dead animals will be disposed of in a manner that meets North
Carolina regulations.
Page: 14

ANIMAL WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN AGREEMENT
Name of Farm:CYPRESS CREEK FARM
Owner/Manager Agreement
I (we) understand and will follow and implement the specifications
and the operation and maintenance procedures established in the
approved.animal waste utilization plan for the farm named above. I
(we) know that any expansion to the existing design capacity of the
waste treatment and storage system or construction of new
facilities will require a new certification to be submitted to the
North Carolina Division of Water Quality (NCDWQ) before the new
animals are stocked. I (we) also understand that there must be no
discharge of animal waste from this system to surface waters of the
state from a storm event less severe than the 25--year, 24-hour
storm. The approved plan will be filed on -site at the farm office
and at the office of the local Soil and Water Conservation District
and will be available for review by NCDWQ upon request.
Naive of Facility Owner: HERSCHEL JENKINS
(Please print)
Signature: A_i` Date: � --7, P -
Name of Manager(If different
Signature:
from owner) :
Date:
Name of Person Preparing Plan: (please print)BILLY W. HOUSTON
Affil.iation:DUPLIN SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT
Phone No. 910-296-2120
Address (Agency): PO BOX 277
KENANSVILLE NC 28349
Signature: Date:
Page: 15

EMERGENCY ACTION PLAN
PHONE NUMBERS
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY (DWO)
EMERGENCY MANAGEMNET SERVICES (EMS)
SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT (SWCD)
NATURAL RESOURCES CONSERVATION SERVICE (MRCS)
COOPERATIVE EXTERSION SERVICE (CES)
[phone]
[phone]
[phone]
[phone]
[phone]
This plan will be implemented in the event that wastes from your operation are leaking,
overflowing or running off site. You should not wait until wastes reach surface waters
or leave you property to consider that you have a problem. You should make every
effort to ensure that this does not happen. This plan should be posted in an accessible
location for all employees at the facility. The following are some action items you should
take.
1 . Stop the release of wastes. Depending on the situation, this may ore may not be
possible. Suggested responses to some possible problems are listed belwo.
A. Lagoon overflow -possible solutions are:
a. Add soil to berm to increase elevation of dam.
b. Pump wastes to fields at an acceptable rate.
c. Stop all flows to the lagoon immediately.
d. Call a pumping contractor.
e. Make sure no surface water is entering lagoon.
B. Runoff from waste application field -actions include:
a. Immediately stop waste application.
b. Create a temporary diversion to contain waste.
c. Incorporate waste to reduce runoff.
d. Evaluate and eliminate the reason(s) that cause the runoff.
e. Evaluate the application rates for the fields where runoff occurred.
C. Leakage from the waste pipes and sprinklers -action include:
a. Stop recycle pump.
b. Stop irrigation pump.
c. Close valves to eliminate further discharge.
d. Repair all leaks prior to restarting pumps.
D. Leakage from flush systems, houses, solid separators -action include:
a. Stop recycle pump.
b. Stop irrigation pump.
c. Make sure siphon occurs.
d. Stop all flows in the house, flush systems, or solid separators.
E. Leakage from base or sidewall of lagoon. Often this is seepage as opposed
to flowing leaks -possible action:
a. Dig a small sump or ditch from the embankment to catch all
seepage, put in a submersible pump, and pump back to lagoon.
b. If holes are caused by burrowing animals, trap or remove animals and fill
holes and compact with a clay type soil.
c. Have a professional evaluate the condition of the side walls and lagoon
bottom as soon as possible.
1

2. Assess the extent of the spill and note any obvious damages.
a. Did the waste reach any surface waters?
b. Approximately how much was released and for what duration?
c. Any damage notes, such as employee injury, fish kills, or property damage?
d. Did the spill leave the property?
e. Does the spill have the potential to reach surface waters?
f. Could a future rain event cause the spill to reach surface waters?
g. Are potable water wells in danger (either on or off the property)?
h. How much reached surface waters?
3. Contact appropriate agencies.
a. During normal business hours call your DWQ regional office; Phone - -. After
hours, emergency number: 919-733-3942. Your phone call should include: your
name, facility number, telephone number, the details of the incident from item 2
above, the exact location of the facility, the location or direction of movement of
the spill, weather and wind conditions. The corrective measures that have been
under taken, and the seriousness of the sitution.
b. If spill leaves property or enters surface waters, call local EMS phorie number.
c. Instruct EMS to contact local Heiath Department.
d. Contact CEs, phone number - , local SWCD office phone number - -, and local
NRCS office for advice/technical assistance phone number - -.
4. If none of the above works tali 911 or the Sheriff's Department and explain you
problem to them and ask the person to contact the proper agencies for you.
5. Contact the contractor of your choice to begin repair or problem to minimize off -
site damage.
a. Contractors Name:
b. Contractors Address
c. Contractors Phone:
6. Contact the technical specialist who certified the lagoon (NRCS, Consulting
Engineer, etc.)
a. Name:
b. Phone:
7. Implement procedures as advised by DWQ and technical assistance agencies to
rectify the damage, repair the system, and reassess the waste managment plan to
keep problems with release of wastes from happening again.
OQ

SWINE FARM WASTE MANAGEMENT ODOR CONTROL CHECKLIST
• Source
Cause
BMP's to Minimize Odor Site Specific Practices
Farmstead
Swine production
{ egetative or wooded buffers;
(commended best management
pr ctices;
( )-food judgment and common sense
Animal body surfaces
Dirty manure -covered animals
(,Wry floors
Floor surfaces
Wet manure -covered floors
{_}-� tted floors;
{ aterers located over slotted floors;
O Feeders at high end of solid floors;
(JL,§crape manure buildup from floors;
Qkrh_derfloor ventilation for drying
Manure collection pits
Urine
( requent manure removal by flush,pit
recharge,or scrape
Parital micorbial decomposition
'
{ +'Ure/nderfloor ventilation
Ventilation exhaust fans
Volatile gases;
( an maintenance;
Dust
(-}-Efficient air movement
Indoor surfaces
Dust
( ashdown between groups of animals
() Feed additives;
(1 Feeder covers;
(! Feed delivery downspout extenders to
feeder covers
Flush tanks
Agitation of recycled lagoon
{ } Flush tank covers
liquid whiles tanks are filling
O Extend fill lines to near bottom of
tanks with anti -siphon vents
Flush alleys
Agitation during wastewater
{ nderfloor flush with underfloor
conveyanance
ventilation
Pit recharge points
Agitation of recycled lagoon
O Extend rechard lines to near bottom of
liquid while pits are filling
pits with anti -siphon vents
Lift stations
Agitation during sump tank filling
{ } Sump tank covers
and drawdown
Outside drain collection
Agitation during wastewater
O Box covers
or junction boxes
conveyance
-
End of drainpipes at lagoon
Agitation during wastewater
{ xtend discharge point of pipes
underneath lagoon liquid level
Lagoon surfaces Volatile gas emissions
{ Proper lagoon liquid capacity
Biological mixing
{ }`C��orrect lagoon startup procedures
Agitation
(i^lVljnimum surface area -to -volume ratio
( inimum agitation when pumping
{) Mechanical aeration
{ } Proven biological additives
Irrigation sprinkler nozzles High pressure agitation
( rt ate on dry days with little or no wind
Wind draft
( inimum recommended operation pressure
F
(-Y6ump intake near lagoon liquid surface
( ) Pump from second -stage lagoon
AMOC--November 11, 1996

Storage tank or basin Partial microbial decomposition O Bottom or midlevel loading
surface Mixing while filling (} Tank covers
Agitation when emptying O Basin surface mats of solids
{) Proven biological additives or oxidants
Settling basin surface Partial micobial decomposition { I Extend drainpipe outlets underneath liquid
Mixing while filling level
Agitation when emptying () Remove settled solids regularly
Manure, slurry or sludge Agitation when spreading ( /oiofyyinjection of slurry/sludges
spreader outlets Volatile gas emissions (4 ash residual manure from spreader after use
( ) Proven biological additives or oxidants
Uncovered manure, slurry Volatile gas emissions while drying f7r infection of slurryh fudges
or sludge on field surfaces 1 j'S9if ineorporation within 48 hours
Wpraad in thin uniform layers for rapid drying
) Proven biological additives or oxidants
Dead animals Carcass decomposition
disposition of carcasses
Dead animal disposal Carcass decomposition {) Complete covering of carcasses in burial pits
pits [) Proper location/construction of disposal pits
Incinerators Incomplete combustion ; ) Secondary stack burners
Standing water around Improper drainage ( $grade and landscape such that water drains
facilities Microbial decomposition of away from facilities
organic matter
Manure tracked onto public Poorly maintained access roads
roads from farm access
rm access road maintenance
Additional Information: Available From:
Swine Manure Management; 0200 Rule/BMP Packet
NCSU-County Extension Center
Swine Production Farm Potential Odor Sources and Remedies, EBAE Fact Sheet
NCSU-BAE
Swine Production Facility Manure Management: Pit Recharge --Lagoon Treatment; EBAE 128-88
NCSU-BAE
Swine Production Facility Manure Management: Underfloor Fluse--Lagoon Treatment; EBAE 129-88
NCSU-BAE
Lagoon Desig and Management for Livestock Manure Treatment and Storage; EBAE 103-83
NCSU-BAE
Calibration of Manure and Wastewater Application Equipment; EBAE Fact Sheet
NCSU-BAE
Controlling Odors from Swine Buildings; PIH-33
NCSU-Swine Extension
Environmental Assuranc Program: NPPC Manual
NC Pork Produces Assoc
Options for Managing Odor; a report from the Swine Odor Task Force
NCSU Agri Communications
Nuisance Concerns in Animal Manure Management: Odors and Flies; PR0107, 1995 Conference Proceedings Florida Cooperative Extension
The issues checked (�4 pertain to this operation. The landowner/integrator agrees to use sound judgment in applying
odor control measures as practical.
l certify the aforementioned odor control Best Managment Practices have been reviewed with me.
{Landowner Signature)
AMOC--November 11, 1996

INSECT CONTROL CHECKLIST FOR ANIMAL OPERATIONS
Source
Cause BMP's to Minimize Odor Site Specific Practices
(Liquid Systems)
Flush Gutters
Accumulation of solids { ush system is designed and operated
sufficiently to remove accumulated
sor s from gutters as designed.
( emove bridging of accumulated solids at
discharge
Lagoons and Pits
Crusted Solids { aintain lagoons, settling basins and
pits where pest breeding is apparent to
minimize the crusting of solids to a depth
of no more than 6-8 inches over more than
30% of surface.
11-1
Excessive Vegetative
Decaying vegetation ( aintain vegetative control along banks of
Growth
lagoons and other impoundments to prevent
accumulation of decaying vegetative matter
along Water's edge on impoundment's perimeter.
(Dry Systems)
Feeders
Feed Spillage I 1 Design, operate and maintain feed systems (e.g.,
bunkers and troughs) to minimize the accumulation
of decaying wastage.
f) Clean up spillage on a routine basis (e.g- 7-10 day
interval during summer; 1 5-30 day interval during winter),
Feed Storage
Accumulations of feed residues f) Reduce moisture accumulation within and around
immediate perimeter of feed storage areas by
insuring drainage away from site and/or providing
adequate containment (e.g., covered bin for
brewer's grain and similar high moisture gran
products).
() inspect for and remove or break up accumulated
solids in filter strips around feed storage as needed.
Animal Holding Areas
Accumulations of animal wastes { } Eliminate low area that trap moisture along fences
and feed wastage and other locations where waste accumulates and
and disturbance by animals is minimal.
I 1 Maintain fence rows and filter strips around animal
holding areas to minimize accumulations of wastes
(i.e. inspect for and remove or break up accumulated
solids as needed).
AMIC--Novernber 11, 1996

Dry Manure Handling Accumulations of animal wastes f l Remove spillage on a routine basis (e.g. 7-10 day
Systems interval during summer; 1 5-30 days interval during
winter) where manure is loaded for land application
or disposal.
i I Provide for adequate drainage around manure stockpiles.
f) Inspect for and remove or break up accumulated wastes
in filter stripes around stockpiles and manure handling
areas as needed.
The issues checked (-}pertain to this operation. The landowner/integrator agrees to use sound judgment in applying
insect control measures as practical.
1 certify the aforementioned insect control Best Management Practices have been reviewed with me.
(Landow er Signature)
reek ra.eA
-
(Farm Name)
(Facility Number)
For more information contact the Cooperative Extension Service, Department of Entomology. Box 7613, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC
27695-7613,
AMIC--November 1 1 , 1996

System Calibration
Information presented in manufacturer's charts are based on average operation conditions
with relatively new equipment. Discharge rates and application rates change over time as
equipment gets older and components wear. In particular, pump wear tends to reduce
operating pressure and flow. With continued use, nozzle wear results in an increase in
the nozzle opening which will increase the discharge rate while decreasing the wetted
diameter.
You should be aware that'operating the system differently than assumed in the design will
alter the application rate, diameter of coverage, and subsequently the application
uniformity. For example, operating the system with excessive pressure results in smaller
droplets, greater potential for drift, and accelerates wear of the sprinkler nozzle. Clogging
of nozzles can result in pressure increase. Plugged intakes or crystallization of mainlines
will reduce operating pressure. Operating below design pressure greatly reduces the
coverage diameter and application uniformity.
For the above reason, you should calibrate your equipment on a regular basis to ensure
proper application rates and uniformity. Calibration at least once every three years is
recommended. Calibration involves collecting and measuring flow at several locations in
the application area. Any number of containers can be used to collect flow and determine
the application rate. Rain gauges work best because they already have a graduated scale
from which to read the application amount without having to perform additional
calculations. However, pans, plastic buckets, jars, or anything with a uniform opening
and cross-section can be used provided the liquid collected can be easily transferred to a
scaled container for measuring.
For stationary sprinklers, collection containers should be located randomly throughout the
application area at several distances from sprinklers. For traveling guns, sprinklers should
be located along a transect perpendicular to the direction of pull. Set out collection
containers 25 feet apart along the transect on both sides of the gun cart. You should
compute the average application rate for all nonuniformity of the application. On a
windless day, variation between containers of more than 30 percent is cause for concern.
You should contact your irrigation dealer or technical specialist for assistance.
*Reprinted for Certification Training for Operations ofAnunal Waste Management Systefnr Manual

OPERATION & MAINTENANCE PLAN
Proper lagoon liquid management should be a year-round priority. It is especially
important to manage levels so that you do not have problems during extended rainy and
wet periods.
Maximum storage capacity should be available in the lagoon for periods when the
receiving crop is dormant (such as wintertime for bermudagrass) or when there are
extended rainy spells such as the thunderstorm season in the summertime. This means
that at the first signs of plant growth in the later winter/early spring, irrigation according to
a farm waste management plan should be done whenever the land is dry enough to
receive lagoon liquid. This will make storage space available in the lagoon for future wet
periods. In the late summer/early fall the lagoon should be pumped down to the low
marker (see Figure 2-1) to allow for winter storage. Every effort should be made to
maintain the lagoon close to the minimum liquid level as long as the weather and waste
utilization plan will allow it.
Waiting until the lagoon has reached its maximum storage capacity before starting to
irrigate does not leave room for storing excess water during extended wet periods.
Overflow from the lagoon for any reason except a 25-year, 24-hour storm is a violation of
state law and subject to penAlty action. `
The routine maintenance of a lagoon involves the following:
Maintenance of a vegetative cover for the dam.
Fescue or common bermudagrass are the most common vegetative
covers. The vegetation should be fertilized each year, if needed, to
maintain a vigorous stand. The amount of fertilizer applied should be
based on a soils test, but in the event that it is not practical to obtain
a soils test each year, the lagoon embankment and surrounding areas
should be fertilized with 800 pounds per acre of 10-10-10, or
equivalent.
Brush and trees on the embankment must be controlled. This may be
done by mowing, spraying, grazing, chopping, or a combination of
these practices. This should be done at least once a year and
possibly twice in years that weather conditions are favorable for
heavy vegetative growth.
NOTE: If vegetation is controlled by spraying, the herbicide must not be allowed to enter
the lagoon water. Such chemicals could harm the bacteria in the lagoon that are treating
the waste.
Maintenance inspections of the entire lagoon should be made during the initial filling of
the lagoon and at least monthly and after major rainfall and storm events. Items to be
checked should include, as a minimum, the following:
Waste Inlet Pipes, Recycling Pipes, and Overflow Pipes ---look for:
1. separation of joints
2. cracks or breaks
3. accumulation of salts or minerals
4. overall condition of pipes

Lagoon surface ---look for:
1. undesirable vegetative growth
2. floating or lodged debris
Embankment ---look for:
1. settlement, cracking, or "jug" holes
2. side slope stability ---slumps or bulges
3. wet or damp areas on the back slope
4. erosion due to lack of vegetation or as a result of wave action
5. rodent damage
Larger lagoons may be subject to liner damage due to wave action caused by strong
winds. These waves can erode the lagoon sidewalls, thereby weakening the lagoon dam.
A good stand of vegetation will reduce the potential damage caused by wave action. If
wave action causes serious damage to a lagoon sidewall, baffles in the lagoon may be
used to reduce the wave impacts.
Any of these features could lead to erosion and weakening of the dam. If your lagoon has
any of these features, you should call an appropriate expert familiar with design and
construction of waste lagoons. You may need to provide a temporary fix if there is a threat
o(a waste discharge. However, a permanent solution should be reviewed by the
technical expert. Any digging into a lagoon dam with heavy equipment is a serious
undertaking with potentially serious consequences and should not be conducted unless
recommended by an appropriate technical expert.
Transfer Pumps ---check for proper operation of:
1. recycling pumps
2. irrigation pumps
Check for leaks, loose fittings, and overall pump operation. An unusually loud or grinding
noise, or a large amount of vibration, may indicate that the pump is in need or repair or
replacement.
NOTE: Pumping systems should be inspected and operated frequently enough so that you
are not completely "surprised" by equipment failure. You should perform your pumping
system maintenance at a time when your lagoon is at its low level. This will,allow some
safety time should major repairs be required. Having a nearly full lagoon is not the time
to think about switching, repairing , or borrowing pumps. Probably, if your lagoon is full,
your neighbor's lagoon is full also. You should consider maintaining an inventory of spare
parts or pumps.
Surface water diversion features are designed to carry all surface
drainage waters (such as rainfall runoff, roof drainage, gutter outlets,
and parking lot runoff) away from your lagoon and other waste
treatment or storage structures. The only water that should be
coming frorn your lagoon is that which comes from your flushing
(washing) system pipes and the rainfall that hits the lagoon directly.
You should inspect your diversion system for the following:
I . adequate vegetation
2. diversion capacity
3. ridge berm height

Identified problems should be corrected promptly. It is advisable to inspect your system
during or immediately following a heavy rain. If technical assistance is needed to
determine proper solutions, consult with appropriate experts.
You should record the level of the lagoon just prior to when rain is predicted, and then
record the level again 4 to 6 hours after the rain (assumes there is no pumping). This will
give you an idea of how much your lagoon level will rise with a certain rainfall amount
(you must also be recording your rainfall for this to work). Knowing this should help in
planning irrigation applications and storage. If your lagoon rises excessively, you may
have an inflow problem from a surface water diversion or there may be seepage into the
lagoon from the surrounding land.
Lagoon Operation
Startup:
immediately after construction establish a complete sod cover on bare soil
surfaces to avoid erosion.
2. Fill new lagoon design treatment volume at least half full of water before
waste loading begins, taking care not to erode lining or bank slopes.
Drainpipes into the lagoon should have a flexible pipe extender on the
end of the pipe to discharge near the bottom of the lagoon during initial
filling or another means of slowing the incoming water to avoid erosion of
the lining.
4. When possible, begin loading new lagoons in the spring to maximize
bacterial establishment (due to warmer weather).
It is recommended that a new lagoon be seeded with sludge from a healthy
working swine lagoon in the amount of 0.25 percent of the full lagoon
liquid vole ne. This seeding should•occour at least two weeks prior to the
addition of wastewater.
6. Maintain a periodic check on the lagoon liquid pH. If the pH falls below
7.0, add agricultural lime at the rate of I pound per 1000 cubic feet of
lagoon liquid volume until the pH rises above 7.0. Optimum lagoon liquid
pH is between 7.5 and 8.0.
7. A dark color, lack of bubbling, and excessive odor signals inadequate
biological activity. Consultation with a technical specialist is recommended
if these conditions occur for prolonged periods, especially during the warm
season.
Loading:
The more frequently and regularly that wastewater is added to a lagoon, the better the
lagoon will function. Flush systems that wash waste into the lagoon several times daily are
optimum for treatment. Pit recharge systems, in which one or more buildings are drained
and recharged each day, also work well.

Management:
Practice water conservation ---minimize building water usage and
spillage from leaking waterers, broken pipes and washdown through
proper maintenance and water conservation.
Minimize feed wastage and spillage by keeping feeders adjusted. This
will reduce the amount of solids entering the lagoon
Maintain lagoon liquid level between the permanent storage level and
the full temporary storage level.
Place visible markers or stakes on the lagoon bank to show the
minimum liquid level and the maximum liquid lever (Figure 2-1).
Start irrigating at the earliest possible date in the spring based on
nutrient requirements and soil moisture so that temporary storage
will be maximized for the summer thunderstorm season. Similarly,
irrigate in the late summer/early fall to provide maximum lagoon
storage for the winter.
The lagoon liquid level should never be closer than I foot to the lowest
point of the dam or embankment.
Do not pump the lagoon liquid level lower that the permanent storage
Ievel unless you are removing sludge.
Locate float pump intakes approximately 18 inches underneath the liquid
surface and as far away from the drainpipe inlets as possible.
Prevent additions of bedding materials, long-stemmed forage or vegetation,
molded feed, plastic syringes, or other foreign materials into the lagoon.
Frequently remove solids from catch basins at end of confinement houses or
wherever they are installed.
Maintain strict vegetation, rodent, and varmint control near lagoon edges.
Do not allow trees or large bushes to grow on lagoon dam or embankment.
Remove sludge from the lagoon either when the sludge storage capacity is
full or before it fills 50 percent of the permanent storage volume_
If animal production is to be terminated, the owner is responsible for
obtaining and implementing a closure plan to eliminate the possibility of a
pollutant discharge.
Sludge Removal:
Rate of lagoon sludge buildup can be reduced by:

proper lagoon sizing,
mechanical solids separation of flushed waste,
gravity settling of flushed waste solids in an appropriately designed basin, or
minimizing feed wastage and spillage.
Lagoon sludge that is removed annually rather than stored long term will:
have more nutrients,
have more odor, and
require more land to properly use the nutrients.
Removal techniques:
Hire a custom applicator
Mix the sludge and lagoon liquid with a chopper -agitator impeller
pump through large -bore sprinkler irrigation system onto nearby cropland;
and soil incorporate.
Dewater the upper part of lagoon by irrigation onto nearby cropland or
forageland; mix remaining sludge; pump into liquid sludge applicator; haul
and spread onto cropland or forageland; and soil incorporate.
Dewater the upper part of lagoon by irrigation onto nearby cropland or
forageland; dredge sludge from lagoon with dragline or sludge barge; berm
an area beside lagoon to receive the sludge so that liquids can drain back
into lagoon; allow sludge to dewater; haul and spread with manure spreader
onto cropland or forageland; and soil incorporate.
Regardless of the method, you must have the sludge material analyzed for waste
constituents just as you would your lagoon water. The sludge will contain different
nutrient and metal values from the liquid. The application, of the sludge to fields will be
limited by these nutrients as well as any previous waste applications to that field and crop
requirement. Waste application rates will be discussed in detail in Chapter 3.
When removing sludge, you must also pay attention to the liner to prevent damage. Close
attention by the pumper or drag -line operator will ensure that the lagoon liner remains
intact. If you see soil material or the synthetic liner material being disturbed, you should
stop the activity immediately and not resume until you are sure that the sludge can be
removers without liner injury. if the liner is darnaged it must be repaired as soon as
possible.
Sludge removed from the lagoon has a much higher phosphorus and heavy metal content
than liquid. Because of this it should probably be applied to land with low phosphorus
and metal levels, as indicated by a soil test, and incorporated to reduce the chance of
erosion. Note that if the sludge is applied to fields with very high soil -test phosphores, it
should be applied only at rates equal to the crop removal of phosphorus. As with other
wastes. always have your lagoon sludge analyzed for its nutrient value.
The application of sludge will increase the amount of odor at the waste application site.
Extra precaution should be used to observe the wind direction and other conditions which
could increase the concern of neighbors.

Possible Causes of Lagoon Failure
Lagoon failures result in the unplanned discharge of wastewater from the structure. Types
of failures include leakage through the bottom or sides, overtopping, and breach of the
dam. Assuming proper design and construction. the owner has the responsibility for
ensuring structure safety. Items which may lead to lagoon failures include:
Modification of the lagoon structure ---an example is the placement of a pipe
in the dam without proper design and construction. (Consult an expert in
lagoon design before placing any pipes in (Jams.)
Lagoon liquid levels ---high levels are a safety risk.
Failure to inspect and maintain the dam.
Excess surface water flowing into the lagoon.
Linz- integrity ---protect from inlet pipe scouring. damage during sludge
removal, or rupture from lowering lagoon liquid level below groundwater
table.
NOTE.- if lagoon v.-a€er is allowed to overtop the dam, the moving water will soon cause
gullies to form in the dam. Once this damage starts, it can quickly cause a large discharge
of wastewater and possible darn failure. Y

MORTALITY MANAGEMENT METHODS
(check which method(s) are being implemented)
{ } Burial three feet beneath the surface of the ground within 24 hours
after knowledge of the death. The burial be at least 300 feet from
any flowing steam or public body of water.
{ Rendering at a rendering plant licensed under G. S. 106-168.7
( ) Complete incineration
( ) In the case of dead poultry only, placing in a disposal pit of a size and
design approved by the Department of Agriculture.
( ) Any method which in the professional opinion of the State
Veterinarian would make possible the salvage of part of a dead
animal's value without endangering hurnan or animal health._ (Written
approval of the State Veterinarian must be attached)

USDA Sorg CONSERVA110N SERVIC-•
FINAL CONSTRUCTION CHECK AND CERTIFICATION
FOR ANrl\IAI- WASTE TREATMENT LAGOON (359)
NAME
LOCATION _Q, j\4
SIZE OF OPERATION 3 VFu FARROW TO -FEEDER
FARROW TO FINISH"
. FARROW PTO WEAN ;:.
► ' FEEDER TO FINISH ;
CONTRACTING• COMPANY � (. r . „ � , - .
WEANTO' FEEDER'• .., ., .
'OTHER
DESIGN DATA AND CONSTRUCTION CHECK DATA ; -- -
.TBM ELEVATION TO,00 FEET
AS DESIGNED AS BUILT: .
INSIDE TOP DIMENSION
DIKE TOP WIDTH
TOP OF DIKE
BOTTOM OF LAGOON -
INSIDE SIDESLOPE
OUTSIDE SIDESLOPE
PIPE INVERT
CLAY LINER/CORE TRENCH
HAS LAGOON BEEN SEEDED TO PERMANENT VEGETATION YES lN0
DOES LAGOON MEET SCS MINIMUM STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR
WASTE TREATMENT LAGOONS AS OUTLINED IN PRACTICE CODE 359?
YES NO
COMMENTS ?- :�, ':� 9G� r�-r�J L �•! 7:E r:7
SIGNATURE F�:�.;., TITLE' i DATE 1 f

ANIMAL WASTE MANAGEMENT PLAN CERTWICATION FOR NEW OR EXPANDED FEEDLOTS
Please return the completed form to the Division of Environmental Management at the address, on the reverse side
of this form.
Name of farm (Please print): CYPRC95 Cgectc F-ARM 119051 C MENE NS
Address: reqz Nmys . QoaD _
�larl�c_� K. c. 1 a gLt Phone No: 916 .2Bg- 24o3
County: — . 12PC r u _
Farm location: Latitude and Longitude :W—tj!1:�~/ T 4r'�c "(required). Also, please attach a copy of county road
map with location identified.
Type of operation (swine, layer, dairy, etc.) 5WAAK ELEIN — -EIPA. _
Design capacity (number of animals): 4.0
Average size of operation .(12 month population avg.): 4.o
Average acreage needed for land application of waste (acres) 44- J"
Technical Specialist Certification
As a technical specialist- designated by the North Carolina Soil and Water Conservation Commission pursuant to
the 15A NCAC 6F .0005, I certify that the new or expanded animal waste management system as installed for the
farm named above has an animal waste management plan that meets the design, construction, operation and
maintenance standards and specifications of the Division of Environmental Management and the USDA -Soil
Conservation Service and/or the North Carolina Soil and Water Conservation Commission pursuant to 15A NCAC
2H.0217 and 15A NCAC 6F .0001-.0005. The following elements and their corresponding minimum criteria have
been verified by me or other designated technical specialists and are included in the plan as applicable: minimum
separations (buffers); liners or equivalent for lagoons or waste storage ponds; waste storage. capacity; access or
ownership or proper waste application equipment; schedule for timing of applications; application rates; loading
rates; and the control of the discharge of pollutants from stormwater runoff events less severe than the 25-year,
24-hour storm.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print): A�bd'mo L. f,1sBs�+
Affiliation: C4,e12-61G s dos ,Y.rl�• _
Address (Agency): A0 044,vW ��,t r/_�4as _ AI.C. 24 g98 Phone No.9/b P 93 —343,6 �
Signature: 0�?da.r,';9� Date:_ JQ,,W
----------------
Owner/Manager Agreement
I (we) understand the operation and maintenance procedures established in the approved animal waste management
plan for the farm named above and will implement these procedures. I (we) know that any additional expansion
to the existing design capacity of the waste treatment and storage system or construction of new facilities will
require a new certification to be submitted to the Division of Environmental Management before the new animals
are stocked. I (we) also understand that there must be no discharge of animal waste from this system to surface
waters of the state either through a man-made conveyance or through runoff from a storm event less severe than
the 25-year, 24-hour storm. The approved plan will be filed at the farm and at the office of the local Soil and
Water Conservation District.
Name of Land Owner (Please Print): s
Signature:4. Date: ZVZ&Y —
Name of Manager,if differen from owner (Please print):
Signature: Date:
Note: A change in land ownership requires notification or a new certification (if the approved plan is changed)
to be submitted to the Division of Environmental Management within 60 days of -a title transfer.
DEM USE ONLY:ACNEW#

WATER QUALITY PLAMING irax:919-715-5637 Jun 20 '95 14:19 P. 17i17
I -TUN 20 ' 9S 03 : 17PM
State'of �Vo -tit-=CgrofhaAN
Depart ne t:,of Eh .lr6hfnent,
1-fedltfl dnCl Natural Resources 4 '•
Division of Environmental Monagernent E
James B..Hunt, Jr., Governor daft
Jonathan B.--Howes', Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
ADDENDUM
CONDI'F14Ns: ANWOR E$CEPTIUNS tG CERTIFICATION
Name of Farm: C Y P2Es�s OREray- = F w+ t
Address. __fa4 2 . ]�a r� �5, oRD i L t ►�[ C' 28" G County:_y�L L K
Name of band owner (print): A4k,eIeAe_ .r_ KrR S
O siguiture (Land owner):_. —
Name of Technical Specialist Eerafying (print): o�v -
Signature (Technical specialist): nary: �o1s'/4s
All statements below that are inidalled-by-a technical specialist apply to the attached certification:
X' Mie irrigation systerrr.has roar been insmllad or evaluaied co=wmg nozzle size, spray Patteim•
. spacing, :.plpe siie, etc: It is the. responsibiity of the producer to obtain and Operate the
system wuh the propericomponents and to supply the mquixed maintenance to assure that no
runoff o f pollumn occan :daring pperation and that the waste is applied at the approved razes.
By ,Dea I, i3S,; {monWday/year) -he producer should hwe an inipfion specialist, possibly
the dealei where the system was purchased, prepare an• operation_and maintenance plan for
the ini'gadon system so that the produces knows how W operate. the- equipment to meet the
non -discharge requirements.
The waste management plan for-L s operation is based on.Xlelds higher than what is now
xt=commended by NRCS;' however; these yields are ob€ainable under high levels of
managemem and the -fanner has supporting documentation to justify higher ni=gen
application rites.
_2�,*_ All of tite•permanen� vegetation requited by the wasteymanagcment plan has not beeA
established as of the datCof this rddffcaran. the producer agrees to establish the
vegetate by==(mont2?Jilayiyear).and sa,pmvide,a teuporary.smaII;grain.crop in
rase some' um is- or Eo the` establish ieui O£the;perrnarrr��;r vegeta#on_ ,
:71M landnwncr i$*p=si fo><. yuig'DF1 vvrining that br--stated:work that hasa.compliance
aaie lint been completed. Ts tnauot� must taxed l}y lGs. ,tba� 1s "days;,
cnmptiahce above. 'Ream t►erificagon of trice properly completed work to: DEI1it
Planning Brash, P.O. Box 29535, Ralcigh. N.C.. 27626.
revised- 6-15-95
P.O. Box 29535! Rde9gh. Nor4h Carolina 27S2b-0535 Tglaphono 19-733-7015 FAX [phone]
An Equd �odt mity Affirm 0VO Action EmPloyer 6" recyci i d/ 3 CM post-conuirner popor .

;v/aesS [R��c
>
o U N I t k
l
51
Honey
THE STATE
North Carolina's Stat,
bee, one of the most v.
z State. Not only do h
millions of dollars wort
but they pollinate manj
important crops, includir
bee climbs into a flowe
bee's body hairs and is c
of the bee for transpo
Honey bees are social it
made hives for the m
1973.)
Mink
Mink was one of the most highly -prized
bearers, but as fashion trends chang
long-haired pelts became more valual
The color of the fur is uniformly brox
dark and glossy on the back. Most m
are raised on game farms for their
They are 1 % to 2 feet long, slender, and he
short legs and a long tail. The mink feed:
night, mostly on small mammals and bir
They nest in burrows in banks of streams,
der stumps or in hollow logs_

UNITED STATES
DEPARTMENT OF
AGRICULTURE
SOIL
CONSERVATION
SERVICE
WASTE MANAGEMENT -FACILITY SITE EVALUATION
GENERAL.INFORMATION
NAMEr�4�1�-���k�nl _- - LOCATION=On
,, �r 1 —J _
z [Q_2� ,� _a —
TELEPHONE SIZE OPERATION—
`.
r-y Y Lt
t LOCATION: DATA r ;. ti } ; {�
DISTANCE:;• OFF oM ^NEARESTz RESIDENCE `NOT OWNED BY
PRODUCER --_-FT.' 1
IS ._SITE _WITHIN `100-YEAR .,FLOOD„PLAINS YES ---- NO'�-
If yes, -­SCS cannot ,provide tassistance
4 1 t S- ly
-" 5 - . ..! .' .v .. J -i:. •J -. 'f" 4- 4 l {"F by -: --- _
IS SITE AT }LEAST, :104 FT FROM _A' "BLUE LINE"
z :PERENNIAL � + � � _ YES-` . - NO-----
If; no site mist be reloca d
IS 'SITE'- WITHIN, 1 MILE ZONING URISDICTION'.'_
OF A MUNICIPALITY?:.
,l YES----- No.If .'yes' landowner '-should.consult...:with::local zoning board
about .required permits Permits must�be,obtained prior
to desigii-,approval.
Are utilities in construction area? YES----- NO ----
If yes, see Part 503 of the National Engineering Manual
r and follow policy'
(Copies of maps or other reference materials may be
attached to site evaluation.)
Page 1

I
WETLANDS
WILL SITE INVOLVE CLEARING WOODLAND OR ANY
NON -CROPLAND? YES------ NO ----
if yes, producer must complete a Form AD-1026.
WILL ACTION RESULT IN SWAMPBUSTING? YES---- NO ----
IF WETLANDS ARE INVOLVED, IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE
PRODUCER TO CONTACT THE US ARMY CORP OF ENGINEERS AND THE
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT TO DETERMINE IF
-ADDITIONAL:PERMITS.ARE REQUIRED.- NO WETLANDS SHOULD BE.
...ALTERED UNTIL. PRODUCER, RECEIVES WRITTEN APPROVAL• FROM SCS,
US.- ARMY CORP: OF ,.ENGINEERS..AND NC DIVISION. OF ENVIRONMENTAL
- MANAGEMENT
AD--1026 tand CPA-02'6', should be attached'_to
site...evaluation: j
OTHER -ENVIRONMENTAL;:FACtORS
IS ENDANGERED_AND/OR THREATENED SPECIES:'HABITAT
P2£SENT� a, = YES- NO
IS;: ,A. DESIGNATED °NATURAL SCENIC :AREA .INCLUDED` -IN -THE
` M PLANNING y"AREA' '.OR 'WILL :PLANNED` ACTIONS- IMPACT'°ON ,`AN f
ADJACENT ' NATURAL ;SCENIC:, AREA. ' YES-- = - NO----
IS:AN`,ARCHAEOLOGICAL OR HISTORICAL -SITE LOCATED IN THE,
PLANNED='AREA?=`" YES--- ` NO-----
ARE:°THERE.PRIME, UNIQUE, STATE; OR .LOCALLY .IMPO TANT
FARMLANDS IN ,THE OPERATING _UNIT.?; , .., YES= N0-
WLLL,:.THE ACTION RESULT IN SODBUSTING� YES- NO
If.yes to. any-..,, these ;quest o s; refer; to_ form. NC-CPA-16
for.pol�cy sources:` The formd es not •need .to be
completed..::.
•ODOR.-.- CONTROL...: #
-HAS.,ODOR CONTROL 13EEN_DISCUSSED WITH:PRODUCER...........
. ... PREDOMINANT WIND -DIRECTION? :YES'-- -- NO ----
..........POSSIBLE EXPANSION OF TREATMENT
VOLUME FROM 1 CU.FT. UPWARDS TO
3 CU. FT./LB. OF ANIMAL?' YES---- NO----
. ........PRECHARGING LAGOON WITH FRESH
WATER TO AT LEAST 1/2 OF THE
CAPACITY? YES-`- - NO ----
........USING GOOD SOUND JUDGMENT IN
LAND APPLICATION OF WASTE? YES -- -- NO ----
Page 2

-WASTE MANAGEMENT
DOES PRODUCER OWN ENOUGH LAND TO PROPERLY LAND
APPLY WASTE? 'YES---- NO ----
IF NO, DOES PRODUCER HAVE ACCESS_ TO
MORE LAND? YES—�:fL NO ----
IF LAND IS NOT OWNED BY PRODUCER,
CAN PRODUCER 'GET- AGREEMENT ON LAND
ON WHICH TO APPLY WASTE? YES---- NO ----
.(Attach Waste Utilization Plan to site evaluation..).
SOIL :-INVESTIGATION; .,VALID ONLY IF.,'SOIL -INVESTIGATION'
SHEET..' ATTACHED i..
I5: SOIL' SUITABLE.=FOR .,LAGOON?. -YES .;`/ NO - --
�_—
IS A :CLAY LINERzR.EQUIRED? . XES-=- NO -_-
IF :YES;' I� :CLAY, AVAILABLE-ONSITE?. YES-�. N0- -
_ - � QUESTIONABLE--- ti T_ -
IS A CORE TRENCH :REQUIRED?, YES N0- --
{Attach soi investigation sheet to site evaluation:)
11
jv •t �'�
r
SITE 'AP PROVED YES-==-- NO-=----' CONDITLONAL---= --
--'IA ' �� / �a �w !ARE/_ ✓ �{r!" /Glr,n+ng�
} .SJ-L�����a+❑7!� �� 1��
lhs �A f4,_�— S11cvv'= e%0.yf — soi II—rJTI��
THIS. SITE INVESTIGATION_ IS'VALID AS LONG AS THE DESIGN AND
CONSTRUCTION,. -OF LAGOON CONTINUES IN REASONABLE TIME
PERIOD.- UNDPE.DELAYS_OR. HESITANCY. IN CONSTRUCTION MAY
REQUIRE THAT SITE, EVALUATION BE INVALIDATED.
(� ___� cT __- C-6�9
SIGNATURE- ----- DATE-
and Seaso-%a er - Qe. eje,.a+Ia^f. Mal
I -tor �.S��.o �^i- I4,o0�, i ;ner•� insJe
Sv,Me- clay for 100- a.r ha •e �v be
Page 3
µof
Apo.", ,
a ✓ l-C d ��v fi c7�s, fe ,

J. ';- ULI'nrii-,f.i ')e Ur�L
` vc.. 5-70 Y n01L COKSCRVAriorq SERVICC
SOIL INVESTIGATION TO DETERMINE SUITABILITY OF I"ROPOSED POND SITE_
I'A ,M-ER'S NAME DISTRICT 3
• DATE . 11 i - ? ' COUNTY r�
S_ C. S. PHOTO SHEET NO. WORK UNIT
WATERSHED AREA MEASLMEMEM
CROPLAND —ACRES
WOODLAND -ACRES TOTAL••
•
•• • •
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■®■■■■
■■■■■■M■■■■■■®■■■■■■■■■OEM
mom
�■■m■■■
MEN
■■■■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■EN
EME■■■■■■■■■MEN
■■mm
Immmms
-M■■■■■■EM■N■■■
■
■■_
■■■
■M®®®■■■■®■■■
■MERE,
N■■■■MEMEMEM■■■■■■E
■■■■■■■■■■■■■
MEMO■
■■
■■
■
E■■■M■
ME
ONE
■
■
■■■
ENE
so
MEMNON
Monson
mom
f
01®
I©
®mil■
�■
!
!■I■�lm1■lmmI
ll
l■
®
�®■
1■e
�■�
M■
®��l■�E��
�i■
i
�■�l■■
IEEE
®
fOe
®
�■1■MESON
1■{
■1■m■!■
��■
e■
■ell
f
f
i

..,
'i
R.--
1
�
t
}
4
g
}
F
r
q
;�
�Ip
`
4
i
`F
1
1
-.
4��.
pfp
i
i
r
'f
{
b
..
1
k
S
k
1
�.
�.
r
i
;F
R
r,
i
�

hereby give you, C
landowner) (producer)
permission to apply the lagoon effluent from your operation
on lr`f acres of my land (see attached map showing the
field(s) to be used for the waste disposal). This
permission is granted for the life of the proposed swine
operation.
I have not and will not give permission to anyone else to
apply their lagoon effluent or litter to the fields and
tracts listed below.
Tract Number
Field(s) Number
r
The lagoon effluent is to be applied in a manner that will
not cause a problem with the nutrients leaching out of the
soil and into ground and surface water (lakes, streams, and
drainage ditches).
i
The application of the waste will be timed in a manner so
that it will not inconvenience the existing farming
operations_
-I9-3-

21 S
It
L16
j,
-4
�16 e
ce... ...
'ITS
--7
J'.-4
I. Fl�,;:ly:
A
r6
7 -�j� IRA,,
W,
-N,
21--u 6y
!:-o
y r6s Creek.
ct
42'30' 9,xm To ff. C. so 253 fMAPLE Hia) 255 40' 256
5AS3 /I Nw
SCALE 1:24 000
1 .5 0 K)LGME7ERS 2
10,00 0 METERS 1000 2000
IGN 1 0
MILES
! -S 1-3 2' low a 1000 20010 3000 4m0 saw 6000 7000 swo 90M 10000
27 MILS FELT
CONTOUR hNTERVAL 2 METERS
NATIONAL GEODETIC VERTICAL DATUM OF 1929
CONTROL ELEVATIONS SHOWN TO THE NEAREST 0.1 METER
1931 MAGNETIC NORTH OTHER ELEVATIONS SHOWN TO THE NEAREST 0.5 METER
',T CENTER OF SHEET
S al 01 NADONA --. MAP I STAr
'('I" Qj, F-, i C
A rL ,,. A P 5 A P S.',.4 t3,-) S ,ULNI

oi
i

Duplin County
Planning Department
FLOOD CERTIFICATION
DATE: 12--29-93
TO: Hershel Jenkins
RE: Flood Certification
: 21 Ac. cleared tract
: NCSR 1826 - Back Swamp Rd.
Duplin County
::aunty Administration Building
224 Seminary Street-
P. O. Box 585
Kenansville, NC 28349-0585
Prone 919-296-2102
800-488-1488
Fax [phone]
FLOOD PRONE DETERMINATION: According to the Flood Insurance Rate Maps
published by the Federal Emergency Management Agency, the cleared
portion of the above' referenced tract is determined to be outside the
100 year flood plain.
The Duplin County Flood Damage Prevention Ordinance does not apply to
areas outside the 100 year flood plain. To avoid any application of
this ordinance, any building construction should be limited to the
existing cleared area.
REFERENCE: Federal Emergency Management Agency
Flood Insurance Rate Map
Duplin County, North Carolina
COMMUNITY PANEL NUMBER: 370083 0275 B
EFFECTIVE DATE: July 4, 1989
If you have any questions or need additional information
please call.
Michael
Aldrid
County
Planner

Operator:HERSHEL JENKINS County: DUPLIN Date: 02/25/'94
Distance to nearest residence (other than owner):feet
1. STEADY STATE LIVE WEIGHT .-t 6o O
0
sows
(farrow to finish)
x 1417
lbs. -
0
lbs
0
sows
(farrow to feeder)
x 522
lbs. -
0
lbs
2640
head
(finishing only)
x 135
lbs. --
356400
lbs
0
sows
(farrow to wean)
x 433
lbs.
- 0
lbs
0
head
(wean to feeder)
x 30
lbs. =
0
lbs
TOTAL STEADY STATE LIVE WEIGHT (SSLW) = 356400 lbs
2. MINIMUM REQUIRED TREATMENT VOLUME OF LAGOON
Volume = 356400 lbs. SSLW x Treatment Volume(CF)/lb. SSLW
Treatment Volume(CF)/lb. SSLW= 1 CF/lb. SSLW
Volume = 356400 cubic feet
3. STORAGE VOLUME FOR SLUDGE ACCUMULAT,IiON '
Volume = 0.0 cubic feet N 6T C'`y-p`` �#tjo°�''"�
TD RE kkencr-1140 AJ n1elk0LA,
4. TOTAL DESIGN VOLUME
Inside top length 195.0 feet ; Inside top width 360.0 feet
Top of dike at elevation 55.8 feet
Freeboard 1.0 feet ; Side slopes 3.0 : 1 (Inside lagoon)
Total design lagoon liquid level at elevation 54.8 feet
Bottom of lagoon elevation 43.8 feet
Seasonal high water table elevation 48.0 feet
Total design volume using prismoidal formula
SS/END1 SS/END2 SS/SIDE1 SS/SIDE2 LENGTH WIDTH DEPTH
3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 189.0 354.0 11.00
AREA OF TOP
LENGTH * WIDTH =
189.0 354.0
AREA OF BOTTOM
LENGTH * WIDTH =
123.0 288.0
66906 (AREA OF TOP)
35424 (AREA OF BOTTOM)
AREA OF MIDSECTION
LENGTH * WIDTH * 4
156.0 321.0 200304 (AREA OF MIDSECTION * 4)
CU. FT. = AAREA TOP + (4*AREA MIDSECTION) + AREA BOTTOMO * DEPTH/6
66906.0 200304.0 35424.0 1.
VOLUME OF LAGOON AT TOTAL DESIGN LIQUID LEVEL = 554829 CU. FT.

5.TEMPORARY STORAGE REQUIRED
DRAINAGE AREA:
Lagoon (top of dike)
Length * Width =
195.0 360.0 70200.0 square feet
Buildings (roof and lot water)
Length * Width
0.0 0.0 0.0 square feet
TOTAL DA 70200.0 square feet
Design temporary storage period to be 180 days.
5A. Volume of waste produced
Approximate daily production of manure in CF/LB SSLW 0.00136
Volume = - 356400 Lbs. SSLW * CF of Waste/Lb./Day * 180 days
Volume = 87247 cubic feet
5B. Volume of wash water
This is the amount of fresh water used for washing floors or volume
of fresh water used for a flush system. Flush systems that recirculate
the lagoon water are accounted for in 5A.
Volume 0.0 gallons/day * 180 days storage/7.48 gallons
per CF
Volume = 0.0 cubic feet
5C. Volume of rainfall in excess of evaporation
Use period of time when rainfall exceeds evaporation by largest amount
180 days excess rainfall = 7.0 inches
Volume = 7.0 in * DA / 12 inches per foot
Volume = 40950.0 cubic feet

5D. Volume of 25 year -- 24 hour storm
Volume = 7.5 inches / 12 inches per foot * DA
Volume = 43875.0 cubic feet
TOTAL REQUIRED TEMPORARY STORAGE
5A.
87247
cubic
feet
5B.
0
cubic
feet
5C.
40950
cubic
feet
5D.
43875
cubic
feet ,�-
TOTAL 172072 cubic feet
6. SUMMARY
Total required volume 528472 cubic feet
Total design volume avail. 554829 cubic feet
Min. req. treatment volume plus sludge accumulation 356400 cubic f,
At elev. 51.9 feet ; Volume is 373631 cubic feet (end pumping)
Total design volume less 25yr-24hr storm is 510954 cubic feet
At elev. 54.0 feet ; Volume is 505561 cubic feet (start pumping
Seasonal high water table elevation 48.0 feet
7. DESIGNED BY.�,,,`
APPROVED BY:
M� r
�30
DATE: 3 - 1-0 y
DATE:
2///Jl7�
NOTE: SEE ATTACHED WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
COMMENTS:
SCS DOES NOT CERTIFY THAT
EXCAVATION AND FILL VOLUMES
ARE CCiRRECT ----

OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE PLAN
------------------------------
This lagoon is designed for waste treatment (permanent storage) with
min. odor control. The time required for the planned fluid level to be
reached (permanent + temporary storage) may vary due to soil conditions
flushing operations, and the amount of fresh water added to the system.
The designed 6 months temporary storage is an estimated volume
based on: 1) waste from animals; 2) excess rainfall after evaporation;
and 3) the largest 24 hour (one day) rainfall that occurs on the
average of once every 25 years. The volume of waste generated from
a given number of animals will be fairly constant throughout the year
and from year to year. This estimate is based on 7 inches of excess
rainfall which is equal to or exceeds the highest 6 months excess in
a year. The average annual excess rainfall is approximately 8 inches.
Therefore, an average of 8 inches of excess rainfall will need to be
pumped each year. The 25 year rainfall will not be a factor to consider
in an annual pumping cycle, but this storage volume must always be
available. A maximum elevation is determined in each design to begin
pumping and this is usually the outlet invert of pipe(s) from
building(s). If the outlet pipe is not installed on the elevation to
begin pumping, a permanent marker must be installed on this elevation
to indicate when pumping should begin. An elevation must be established
to stop pumping to maintain minimum treatment depth (6 feet).
Pumping can be started or stopped at any time between these two
elevations for operating convenience as site conditions permit, such as
weather, soils, crop, and equipment in order to apply waste without
runoff or leaching.
Land application of waste water is recognized as an acceptable
method of disposal. Methods of application include solid set,
center pivot, -guns, and traveling gun irrigation. Care should be
taken when applying waste to prevent damage to crops. '
The following items are to be carried out:
1. It is strongly recommended that the .treatment lagoon}be pre -
charged to 1/2 its capacity to prevent excessive odors during
start-up. Pre -charging reduces the concentration of the initial
waste entering the lagoon thereby reducing odors. Solids should be
covered with effluent at all times. When precharging is complete,
flush buildings with recycled lagoon liquid. Fresh water should not
be used for flushing after initial filling.
2. The attached waste utilization plan shall be followed. This
plan recommends sampling and testing of waste (see attachment)
before land application.
3. Begin pump -out of the lagoon when fluid level reaches eleva-
tion 54.0 as marked by permanent marker. Stop pump -out when
the fluid level reaches elevation 51.9 or before the fluid depth is
less than 6 feet deep (this prevents the loss of favorable
bacteria). The design temporary storage, less 25 year storm
is 128197 cubic feet or 958911 gallons. As stated before, this
volume will vary considerably from year to year.

4. The recommended maximum amount to apply per irrigation is
one (1) inch and the recommended maximum application rate is 0.3
inch per hour.
5. Keep vegetation on the embankment and areas adjacent to the
lagoon mowed annually. Vegetation should be fertilized as needed
to maintain a vigorous stand.
6. Repair any eroded areas or areas damaged by rodents and
establish in vegetation.
7. All surface runoff is to be diverted from the lagoon to stable
outlets.
8. Keep a minimum of 25 feet of grass vegetated buffer around
waste utilization fields adjacent to perennial streams. Waste will
not be applied in open ditches. Do not pump within 200 feet of a
residence or within 100 feet of a well.
9. The Clean Water Act of 1977 prohibits the discharge of
pollutants into waters of the United States. The Department of
Environment, Health, and Natural Resources, Division of Environ-
mental Management, has the responsibility for enforcing this law.

SPECIFICATIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION OF WASTE TREATMENT LAGOONS
----------------------------------------------------------
Clearing:
All trees and brush shall be removed from the construction area
before any excavating or fill is started. Stumps will be removed
within the area of the foundation of the embankment and fill areas
and all excavated areas. All stumps and roots exceeding one (1)
inch in diameter shall be removed to a -minimum depth of one (1)
foot. Satisfactory disposition will be made of all debris. The
foundation area shall be loosened thoroughly before placement of
embankment material. Lagoon site (and pad site if needed) to be
stripped of topsoil (311) and stockpiled for use on dike and pad
slopes (2-311). The topsoiling quantity is in excess of amounts
specified on page one (1).
Cut-off Trench:
----------------
A cut --off trench (when specified) shall be installed as shown in
the plans.
Construction:
-------------
Construction. of excavated and earthfill areas shall be performed to
the neat lines and grades as planned. Deviations from this will
require prior approval of the SCS. Earthfill shall be placed in
max. of 6" lifts and not placed in standing water. Compaction shall be
performed -by the construction equipment or sheeps-foot roller during
placement. The embankment of the lagoon shall be installed using
the more impervious materials. Construction of fill heights shall
include ten (10) percent for settlement. To protect against seepage,
when areas of unsuitable material are encountered, they will need to
be excavated a minimum of below grade and backfilled and
compacted with a SCS approved mat ial (ie-CL,SC,CH). Refer to the soil
investigation information in the pl ns for special considerations.
Precautions should be taken during c struction to prevent excessive
erosion and sedimentation. l.5 {-
Vegetation:
All exposed embankment and other bare constructed areas shall be
seeded to the planned type of vegetation as soon as possible after
construction according to seeding specifications sheet. p �c
G4 %h(/ai�

SEEDING RECOMMENDATIONS
-----------------------
AREA TO BE SEEDED: 2.0 ACRES
USE THE SEED MIXTURE INDICATED:
0 LBS. FESCUE GRASS § 60 LBS./ACRE
(BEST SUITED ON CLAYEY OR WET SOIL CONDITIONS)
SEEDING DATES: SEPTEMBER 15 TO NOVEMBER 30
0 LBS. 'PENSACOLA' BAHIA GRASS.§ 60 LBS./ACRE
(SEE FOOTNOTE NO. 1)
SEEDING DATES: MARCH 15 TO JUNE 30
16 LBS. HULLED BERMUDA GRASS § 8 LBS./AC.
(SUITED FOR MOST SOIL CONDITIONS)
SEEDING DATES: APRIL 1 TO JULY 31
0 LBS. RYE GRAIN § 30 LBS./ACRE (NURSERY FOR FESCUE)
O LBS. RYE GRASS § 40 LBS./ACRE (TEMPORARY VEGETATION)
SEEDING DATES: DECEMBER 1 TO MARCH 30
LBS.
APPLY THE FOLLOWING:
2000 LBS. OF 10-10-10 FERTILIZER (1000 LBS./ACRE)
4 TONS OF DOLOMITIC LIME (2 TONS/ACRE)
200 BALES OF SMALL GRAIN STRAW (100 BALES/ACRE)
ALL SURFACE DRAINS SHOULD BE INSTALLED PRIOR TO SEEDING. SHAPE
ALL DISTURBED AREA IMMEDIATELY AFTER EARTH MOVING IS COMPLETED.
APPLY LIME AND FERTILIZER THEN DISK TO PREPARE A 3 TO 4 INCH
SMOOTH SEEDBED. APPLY SEED AND FIRM SEEDBED WITH A CULTIPACKER
OR SIMILAR EQUIPMENT. APPLY MULCH AND SECURE WITH A MULCH
ANCHORING TOOL OR NETTING.
1. PENSACOLA BAHIAGRASS IS SLOWER TO ESTABLISH THAN COMMON
BERMUDA GRASS. WHEN USING BAHIA, IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT 8
LBS./ACRE OF COMMON BERMUDA BE INCLUDED TO PROVIDE COVER
UNTIL BAHIAGRASS IS ESTABLISHED.

WY. V V
Plot of all data for the surface:
Existing
Project: HERSHAL JENKINS
Drawing: SHT1
Number:
Location:
Bid Data:
Engineer:.
Owner:
Estimator:
Prepared bg: using Sitework
10
62.e0

Orientation: -45.0
56.0
54.0
52.0
60. 0
48.0
46.0
Lower Left
Z Magnification: 17.6
30 Mush Surface
Existing
Project: 1ERSHAL JENKINS
Drawing: SH71
Number:
Location:
Hid Crate:
Engineer:
Owner:
Estimator:
Prepared bg: using Sitawork
Inclination: 20.0
-so Mesh 5urface

f
,--w4F,Nke-m t Wr B LDQ.
7-q of PAp tIEV,
--�? IcOL Ckoss sec-rjog V1EW D C, 4� t)NP--- . �-r�G%r-- LA&oN
A�-T _ R+t-rcN'AP,GT-_- DG-tl -
QaTT0rA 0 fi s u 0k*F1
ZoT AL t)S51 &t4
SToR�AG-S SLV. --Vi
.?Ip
81`. � IP1= 1
1 li' UG Wt o f � Vl l
s.Ir.u,
5u�pnR� L�Gv9 N
p Ep7}{
IN��IRT" Q� auYL►�� PIPE
TOP cP pIK�
eLeV.
4tlNr`1 At2��5.dI~ vN�viT'A�L� N�ATE��p�.
-ry 4? rz 1wG41 VAT
oc'�ow eomAv�-- A►sp
I. om pr�-ret7 w lrH c,G5

Orientation: -45.0
56-00 "
54, 00 "
52.00,
60. 00
48.00
46.00
44.00
42.00
Lower Left
Z Magnification: 13.8
30 Mesh Surface
Balanced
Project: HERSHAL JENKINS
Drawing: SHT1
Numbmr'
Location:
Bid Data!
Engineer:
Owner:
Estimator:
Prepared bu: using Sitawork
Inclination: 26.8
30 Mesh Surface

Fill shrink/swell percent: 20.00 Cut shrink/swell percent: 0.00
Iterating to balancing within 10.0 cubic yards...
delta Cut Fill
0.00 12429.20 12429.25
-0.00 12535.13 12176.77
-0.00 12535.12 12176.80
0.05 12424.54 12440.35
0.05 12429.20 12429.26 -)(
Raise "Proposed" by 0.05 feet.
New surface called "Balanced" has been created.
Project: HERSHAL JENKINS
Drawing: SHT1
Number:
Location:
Bid Date:
Engineer:
Owner:
Estimator:
Prepared by: using Sitework
CUT - FILL
-0.05
358.36
358.31
-15.81
-0.05
'Tv�At ZA".a u DI V 4 0 6P,-
Mound — c u+s A(qd F -klls L A(ANC�r--
T v1' S U o f u m t,
PN,1 0VV�7kc.v'� ova bwc��;11.

Dawliwht Agtor
............................................................................................................. - .........
56,•7
6- .......... .�T ............................. ................
55
....................................................................
43. 76
16
�ze
.. ............................................................ ..............................
.............. . ....... .
1� '76
............ %
.......... ....... - - ------- 4-) .
.............................. 16.76
62.06
025
- BE SS BE1.66.
I I 5. 8 4 15-.-S-� 66.6 tTY&
rw-E�4 155.87
r, 1pi- e2e
s
Plot of all data for the surface:
Balanced
Project: HERSHAL JENKINS
Drawing: SHT1
Number:
Loco ion:
Bid Onto:
Engineer:
Owner:
Estimator:
Prepared bW: using Sitework
P -r- . I

Daylight Perimeter
N................... . .....0.........................................
0,1 slop
43•;-46..............................................................................
cJrv. qg.........................................................
.76
Plot of the contour data for the surface:
Balanced
Project: HERSHAL JENKINS
Drawing: ' SHT1
Number:
Location:
Bid Date:
Engineer:
Owner:
Estimator:
Prepared by: using Sitework

56 76
43.76
43.76
56.76
I
/ 55.
33. 76
Punter
43.76
6 76
159V
SS,g
65
626
�
C
C
v
a
¢
'-
5
.56
6
.66
65.6
56.8
6.67
64 05
Plot of the sloping lines for the surface:
Balanced
Project: HERSHAL JENKINS
Drawing: SHT1
Number:
Location:
Bid Date:
Engineer:
Owner:
Estimator:
62.06
Prepared bg: using Sitawork

65. 7d
r
65.0 56.70+'6b.0 SS. TB
O
P f-
j8
x_
Z
n
55.65
87
Plot of the sloping lines for the surface:
Balanced
Project: HERSHAL JENKINS
Drawing: SHT1
Number:
Location:
Bid Data:
Engineer:
Owner:
Estimator:
Prepared bye: using Sitework

..............................
...................................... I ........
..................................
....................................
ZOW -
.-Im...........................................
.............. .................... I.., .................
........... - ............. -1-1 .......
....................................................
......................... . ................ z
43.
............................ ............. ............ I
.......... ....... ................................ ...............
6e4 . 0 6 20
76
6.76
52.65
! HFPSHAI_ JeNKINS! SHTI: Balanced
25 FES 94 3:56 pm

$6.00
64.00
52.00
s0.00
48.00
46.08
44.00
42. 00 `
(362.66,77.32)
HERSHAL JENKINS: SHTI
(488.78)
(341.43,565.97)
26 FES 94 3:66 PM

- - - .' - i
. '---i--__. _. -
RJR
-
... - 1THINK
:
- } T -
I I- i i_..��,�• ~� I �
�
�..0 - .
✓��1"���!/.�-1��
--�-t�:. :rd1r�iU�r.�ll _, .�-
{ T F
7
1 r,l {` r �• Y '_ IVI/�'r r.-S• ' 1 --
i
I I
1
r
1
r i
E ( i I 1 f i E E I IS 1 -_ { {
'J
�■11777
,
:
46
7 TT- - P
,.44
CY
rE . 1 M- 1 TT:T; 7
i -
w
sit
v�

SCS-FNG-538
Rev. �-78
U. S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
SOIL CONSERVATION SERVICE
SOIL INVESTIGATION TO DETERMINE SUITABILITY OF PROPOSED POND SITE
• t a I Pn law a al .•
WATERSHED AREA MEASUREMENTS
••• + -ACRFS PASTURE- ACRE
.ai • • •• i •• • •
ff-oE?L�W,ud ski-, W-r- 11-4-jifflig raff Rio,
■O00■■■r■OE■
-
N■■
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■■
■NEE■
NEE■■E■■■■■■E■■■■r■
NONE■
■N■■■■Or■■■E■OrrNrO
■
ENEO■
■■■
N■N■0■■E000lO�■
■■NO■NE
NN
■■MEEMErOONO■rO
■ENNEN
■
■■OE■E■ONO■■
MEN
EMEN
NE
■NONE■■EN■N■
EOEONNONEN
E■■EE■0
■■�E■
■■EENE■■■■■■■O■
ONE
■
■■E■■
On
OMMEN
MENo
mom
MEN
M
■
mmmm■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■�■■
rl
m"i
a10101�
ildlimlmf®Iml®1�lmimi
7lE'JI®
l©
IMENI
■1■Mimml®I■
®lam
�i■f
■i■
rl■!
[■I�l�l■
minim
■lmml
f
l�IOI■101E
I■I®(■
�rf■
ill
!■!■fr�I��IEi■10!■f■I
1■1®I■I■!■I■1■I
WERE
®�®I®I■�■Iri�l
®®1■1■1■l■lml■!■',l■lml■i�■I■
1015
XWE
�®i
■�■iE�
I■1■®'�i■f■I■l■i
lOiEllr�rli■l0�■i�lO
i■f■1■�■!■1N■i■
�®i�i01■i!■l�ii■lei®i�■1■��■1■1■
■lf�lrjr!■I®!rf■�
i®l■i■I■i■l�l■I■f■;■I■1■Ol
®®
i■t■I■I®IifaE�l�l�i��■!r)rl�l�lair���alr��
®irf■I■I®!NI■�l■I■�
I�
I■I
!
I!
i
f
CL
i BORINGS

Sin'CD 1
tA
ICAT]O11!C
1 . SM -LE COLLECTION --
0
A. Liquid ?Manure Slurry
1. Under -slotted -floor pit
a. Use a length of 112" conduit open on one end and that can be
easily sealed on the other end (e.g., by placing one's thumb
over the end of the conduit).
b. With both ends of the conduit open, extend .it into the. manure
to the pit floor.
c. Seal the upper end of the conduit trapping the -manure that has
entered the lower end, remove and empty into a bucket or container.
c_ Collect samples from at least 5 locations or at least enough
for a total of I quart of slurry.
e. Thoroughly mix this slurry and empty approximately 112 pint
into sample container.
2. Exterior storage basin or tank
a. Make sure the manure has been well mixed or homogenized with a
liquid manure chopper -agitator pump or propeller agitator.
b. Take samples from approximately 5 locations in the pit, from the
agitator pump,' or from the ma1ure spreader and place. in a bucket.
c . Thoroughly mix and empty 1�V2�: pint into sample container.
II. SAMPLE PREPARATION AND TRANSFER
A. Place the sample for analysis into a flexible or expandable container that
can be sealed_ The container should be rinsed clean with water and free
of any residues but should not be chlorinated or treated in any other way.
Dry litter may also be placed in a sealed plastic bag such as a freezer bag.
B. The sample should be refrigerated, iced or cooled, if possible, or trans-
ferred to the lab immediately.
C. Hand -delivery is the most reliable way of sample transfer, but it can also
be mailed.
D. if mailed, sample container should first be protected with a packing material
such as newspaper, then boxed or packaged with wrapping paper and taped.
F_ The NCDA Plant Analysis Lab provides this service for a nominal fee of
$4 per sample which should be forwarded along with the sample.

PS4,CD 1
1. Addt-ess: tl_ C. Departrien, ei r.gricuI'Wre
Ib Plant Analysis Lab -�
Agronomic Division
Blue Ridge Road Center
Raleigh, NC 27611
Ph: [phone]
Attn: Dr. Ray Campbell
F. Request that as a minimum the following analyses be performed:
1. Total nitrogen (TKN)
2- Ammonia nitrogen (Nii N)
'3. Total phosphorus .(TP
Q. Potassium .(K)
5. Dry litter samples should also include a total so -lids (TS) analysis.
G. Other analyses performed at no extra cost by NCDA include trace mineral.s.'

hc!i
PSWICD 2
C. Lagoon Liquid --
i. Collect approximately 1/2 pint of recycled lagoon liquid from the
inflow pipe to the flush tanks.
2. From lagoon
a. Place a small bottle (1/2 pint or less) on the end of a 1'0--15 '
foot long pole.
b. Extend the bottle 10-15 feet away from the bank edge.
c. Brush away any floating scum or debris so it is not collected
with sample. -
d. Submierge the bottle within 1 foot of the liquid surface.
e. Repeat at approximately 5 locations around the lagoon, place
into a bucket, thoroughly mix, and empty l pint into sample
container.
3. From a multi -stage lagoon system collect sample from lagoon that
is going to be irrigated from.
11. SNIPLE PREPARATION AND TRANSFER
A. Place the sample for analysis into a flexible or expandable -container that
can be sealed. The container should be rinsed clean with water and free
Of any residues but ,should not be c�,J or.i hated or treated -in any other way.
Dry litter may also'be placed in a Sealed plastic bag such as a freezer bag.
B. The sample should be refrigerated, iced or cooled, if possible, or trans-
ferred to the lab immediately.. ,
C. Hand -delivery is the most reliable way of sample transfer, but it can also
be mailed.
D_ If mailed, sample container should first be protected with a packing material
such as newspaper, then boxed or packaged with wrapping paper and taped.
E. The 11'CDA Plant Analysis -Lab provides this service for a nominal fee of
54 per sample which should be forwarded along with the sample.
7. Address: U. C. Department of Agriculture
Plant Analysis Lab
Agronomic Division
Blue Ridge Road Center
Raleigh, NC 2- 611
P"': (919) 7133-2655 -
At4n: Dr. R3y Campbell

PSWCD 2
'r I:e;UcSL LISU L 4ti lE i ni ;iUE i the i 0111 ,=': iy cili 1 j'SGS be peri-Qrii[t L:
1. Total nitrogen (TKN) T
2. Ammonia nitrogen Mi
N)
3. Total phosphorus
4. Potassium (K)
5. Dry litter samples should also include a total solids (TS) analysis.
G. Other analyses performed at no extra cost by hCDA include trace minerals.

U. S. Department of Agriculture
.Soil Conservation Service
NC-ENG-34
September 1980
File Code: 210
HAZARD CLASSIFICATION DATA SHEET FOR DAM
Landowner jeers,=hey _ r��k ,, — - - County<_.. ----
Community or Group No. C -1
Conservation Plan No.
Estimated Depth of Water to Top of Dam /2,o Ft. Length of Flood Pool Ft.
Date of Field Hazard Investigation 1-6 -qc-
Evaluation by reach of flood plain downstream to the point of estimated minor effect
from sudden dam Jailure.
Est. Elev.:Est. Elevation
Kind of :Improvements: of Breach
Reach: Length: Width: Slope: Land Ilse ; Improvements Above :Floodwater Above
_ Flood Plain: Flood Plain
Ft. Ft. Ft. Ft.
1
2
3
Describe potential for loss of life and damage to existing or probable future downstream
improvements from a sudden breach N oVV
��
Hazard Classification of Dam (�), b, c) (see NEM-Part 520.21)
Dam Classification (1, 1I, III,; V V)
By
name title
Concurred By M • �, Sck
name title
NOTE: I. Instructions on reverse side.
2. Attach additional sheets as needed.
Date
Date3-/1--9

State of .North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
July 31, 1998
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Herschel Jenkins
Cypress Creek Farm
692 James Rd
Wallace NC 28466
Farm Number: 31- 274
Dear Herschel Jenkins:
A&1101,
464
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND McrURAL RESOURCES
You are hereby notified that Cypress Creek Farm, in accordance with G.S. 143-215.10C, must
apply for coverage under an Animal Waste Operation General Permit. Upon receipt of this letter, your
farm has sixty (60) days to submit the attached application and all supporting documentation. In
accordance with Chapter 626 of 1995 Session Laws (Regular Session 1996), Section 19(c)(2), any
owner or operator who fails to submit an application by the date specified by the Department
SHALL NOT OPERATE the animal waste system after the specified date. Your application must
be returned within sixty (60) days of receipt of this letter. Failure to submit the application as required
may also subject your facility to a civil penalty and other enforcement actions for each day the facility is
operated following the due date of the application.
The attached application has been partially completed using information listed in your Animal
Waste Management Plan Certification Form. If any of the general or operation information listed is
incorrect please make corrections as noted on the application before returning the application package.'
The signed original application, one copy of the signed application, two copies of a general location
map, and two copies of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan must be returned to complete the
application package. The completed package should be sent to the following address:
North Carolina Division of Water Quality
Water Quality Section
Non -Discharge Permitting Unit
Post Office Box 29535
Raleigh, NC 27626-0535
If you have any questions concerning this letter, please call Sue Homewood at [phone]
extension 502 or Dave Holsinger with the Wilmington Regional Office at [phone].
S' cerely,
o .Preston//oZwa,Jr., P.E.
cc: Permit File (w/o encl.)
Wilmington Regional Office (w/o encl.)
P.O. Sox 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
November 13, 1996
Herschel Jenkins
Herschel Jenkins Farm
Rt 2 Box 267-AA
Wallace NC 28466
SUBJECT: Operator In Charge Designation
Facility: Herschel Jenkins Farm
Facility ID#: 31-274
Duplin County
Dear Mr. Jenkins:
Senate Bill 1217, An Act to Implement Recommendations of the Blue Ribbon Study
Commission on Agricultural Waste, enacted by the 1996 North Carolina General Assembly,
requires a certified operator for each animal waste management system that serves 250 or more
swine by January 1, 1997. The owner of each animal waste management system must submit a
designation form to the Technical Assistance and Certification Group which designates an
Operator in Charge and is countersigned by the certified operator. The enclosed form must be
submitted by January 1, 1997 for all facilities in operation as of that date. Failure to designate a
certified operator for your animal waste management system is a violation of 15A NCAC 2H
.0224 and may result in the assessment of a civil penalty.
If you have questions concerning operator training or examinations for certification, please
contact your local North Carolina Cooperative Extension Service agent or our office.
Examinations have been offered on an on -going basis in many counties throughout the state for
the past several months and will continue to be offered through December 31, 1996.
Thank you for your cooperation. If you have any questions concerning this requirement please
call Beth Buffington or Barry Huneycutt of our staff at 919n33-0026.
Sincerely,
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P. rector
Division of Water Quality
Enclosure
cc: Wilmington Regional Office
Water Quality Files
P.O. Box 27687, '.
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687 �4��C An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer
Voice 919-715-4100 - - 60% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
MAY 14, 1996
MEMORANDUM
To: Shannon Langley
(Compliance Group
From: Jim Bushardt
Through: Dave Adkiris.
Subject: Herschell Yenklns Swine Facility (Cypress Creek Farm)
Recommenda s for Coverage under 2H.0217
Duplin County
The Herschell Jenkins Swine Farm had a lagoon failure in
August 1995. Approximately 750,000 gallons was released from the
lagoon via submerged drain tile that was never removed during the
lagoon construction. The wastewater flowed to Back Creek
tributary to Cypress Creek in the Cape Fear River Basin (class C
swamp waters). The lagoon was repaired rapidly by excavating and
removing the drain tile and patching the excavated lagoon dike
with clay material. The, Region was satisfied with the repair
activity. The inspection revealed that Mr. Jenkins did not have
an irrigation system at the farm which was placed into service in
June 1994. In addition, he did not have a cover crop available to
receive spray irrigation at the time of the inspection. The corn
was brown and he did not plant the coastal bermuda, specified
within his plan. The lack of available cover crop and spray
equipment was the reason that the farm was recommended for
removal from the deemed permitted status.
The correspondence indicates that coastal bermuda/small
grain crops and spray irrigation equipment are now present on the
site. It is recommended that the Cypress Creek Farm be covered
under the 2H.0217 permitting rule.
If you have questions concerning this subject, please
contact me at [phone].
JB:JENKINS.596
cc :=Daave—Ho-singe
�---.Wilmington Office Swine Files

State of North Carolina :9@199TM
Department of Environment, MAR 0 1 1496
Health and Natural Resources +
Division of Environmental Management ................
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary � � � FNJ F1
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
CERTIFIED MAIL February 27, 1996
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
MR. HERSCHEL JENKINS
CYPRESS CREEK SWINE FARM
692 JAMES ROAD ROUTE 2 - WALLACE
WALLACE, NC 28466
Subject: Notice of Violation # 95-62
Notice of Intent to Revoke Deemed Permit
Cypress Creek Swine Farm
Farm Number 31-274
Duplin County
Dear Mr. Jenkins:
You are hereby notified that, having been deemed permitted to have a nondischarge permit for the
subject animal waste disposal system pursuant to 15A NCAC 2H .021.7, you have been found to
be in violation of your 2H .0217 Permit.
An inspection was performed on August 3, 1995, after an advisement was received from the
Duplin County NRCS Office relative to a discharging submerged drain tile outlet. The facility was
designed and constructed with assistance from the NRCS. According to NRCS personnel,
several submerged drain tile pipes were removed during the lagoon construction phase. However,
at least one drain the was not detected during the construction of the lagoon. This drain tile
allowed a discharge of 750,000 gallons of lagoon wastewater into a farm ditch which flowed to
Back Swamp. Back Swamp is classified as "C-Swamp" waters within the Cape Fear River Basin.
The finishing operation was required to have coastal bermuda planted in the spring of 1995, but a
coastal berrnuda field was not found during the inspection. The adjacent field contained a mature
corn crop. There was not evidence that spray irrigation activities had been performed. In addition,
there was no spray equipment found on the site during the inspection.
In accordance with the requirements of NCAC 2H .0213, you are hereby given notice that sixty
(60) days following your receipt of this letter, the Division of Environmental Management intends
to revoke your permit unless the following conditions are completed:
1. Immediately eliminate the discharge of wastewater or correct the violation.
2. Make any modifications needed to ensure there will be no future discharges.
3. Submit an approved animal waste management plan and have the attached certification form
completed. One copy of the plan must be sent to your local Soil and Water Conservation
District.
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

The certification form and two (2) copies of your plan must be returned to the address below:
Division of Environmental Management
Water Quality Section Operations Branch
P.O. Box 29535
Raleigh, NC 27626-0535
Failure to comply with the above conditions will result in permit revocation and therefore, the
existing animal waste management system serving your animal operation will be in operation
without a permit as required by North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1.
Your approved animal waste management plan must explain how you will collect, store, treat and
land apply your animal waste in an environmentally acceptable manner. To assist you in the
development of this plan and to provide the required certification that the plan is acceptable, you
should contact your local agricultural agencies such as the Soil and Water Conservation District,
the USDA Natural Resource Conservation Service, the North Carolina Cooperative Extension
Service or a technical specialist designated pursuant to the rules adopted by the Soil and Water
Conservation Commission.
If we have not received the requested animal waste management plan and certification within 60
days of receipt of this letter or if there are additional discharges to the surface water a civil penalty
of up to $10,000 may be assessed and you may be required to apply for an individual
nondischarge permit from the Division. This permit, if issued, will contain monitoring and
reporting requirements determined to be necessary by the Division.
Although we will make every effort to work with you in correcting the problems found at your
facility, please be advised that nothing in this letter should be taken as preventing the Division from
taking appropriate enforcement actions for either these violations or other past or future violations.
If you have any questions concerning this matter please do not hesitate to contact either Dave
Adkins, Water Quality Regional Supervisor for our Wilmington Regional Office at [phone]
or Mr. Shannon Langley at [phone], ext. 581.
Sinc ely, } :�
i
i
A. Preston Ho d, Jr E.
ATTACHMENTS
cc: Dave Adkins--Regional-Wawr Quality -Supervisor
Mike Sugg - Duplin County Soil and Water Conservation District
Ronnie Kennedy - Duplin County Health Department
Tom Jones - Regional Coordinator, NC DSWC, Morehead City
ComplianceM forcement File

r1
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
AUGUST 7, 1995
MEMORANDUM
To: Wilmington Office Files (Duplin Animal Operations)
e"
From: Jim Bushardt
Subject: Swine Lagoon aste Spill
The writer and Steve West responded to a notice received
from the Duplin County NRCS relative to a swine lagoon waste
spill at the Herschel Jenkins Cypress Creek Farm. The incident
occurred during the morning of August 3, 1995 and involved the
release of approximately 1 million gallons of swine lagoon waste
into Back Swamp which is tributary to Cypress Creek in the Cape
Fear River Basin. A subsurface drain tile (6 inch dia, clay pipe)
was not found during the lagoon construction. This pipe allowed
the release into a farm ditch which flowed to Back Swamp. Mr.
Ronnie Kennedy with the Duplin County Health Department was
alerted of the incident on August 4, 1995. The NRCS was involved
with the lagoon repair which focused on removal of the drain pipe
and reconstruction of the lagoon dike in the area where the pipe
was removed. Photographs and water quality samples were taken.
The water sample resulted in a value of 22,000 fecal coliform
colonies per 100 ml. The Division's Environmental Sciences Branch
has indicated that they will begin sampling the creek at the NCSR
1828 Bridge on August_ 7, 1995 as an expanded part of the
Limestone Creek sampling activity (health alert support).
The event was not created by anomalous operations at the
farm.
JB:JENKINS.895
cc: Tom Jones
M

1 - ,
n
20
�... o n a
N
27.511
Cem
— — V
— . a 13
_° zc nl _
, _ - _ 20
Ifl
22-6 If — - Cem
u
If _ _ HERSCHEL JENKINS
- I" CYPRESS CREEK FARM
IA 0 DUPLIN COUNTY
210 H USGS QUAD: LYMAN, NC
0
—
p - Ifi5
SPILL FLOW PATH � M !T
t /` i Cem \'
;_ —_ - - _ -` Cypres/Creel:
-- — is - -- _ E-rY - - - r Cem• 2A 0___
2 380 000 FEET-
51 42'30" -153� (MAPLE ,
)ublished by the Geological Survey 5e5311.
A, and North Carolina Geodetic survey SCALE 1.
'trio methods from aerial photographs MN t .5 0 _ KILOME
119BOi Map edited i981 _V. �i, cN t t0�c 5 t1 M �Es
^^^ 1Rnn MILT
,nn„ zn�r rrn,

Chemists,
1ho
`.LAJL NG—ILDDR. SS;
ix'LEPHON'E:
P.G. Box 1037
(91012S60934 (Ouicc)
66DZ NL% m i Vl'a}•
CONSUL i iNG
�t rig is ili Bczch,
(910) 392-02? i (Iao)
tiVM., ^*.on,
CHEM157S
!Vorth Carolina 28480
(910) 392- W24 (Fax)
North Ca rolim 23405
CHAIN OF CUSTODY FOR SAMPLE COLLECTION
Client: Report *:
Collected By (signature & print) /,�!J��/ ��% ram
Sample Type: In=luent, Effluent, Well, `ream Soil, Other
Collection: For composite Indicate Date & Time for Start & Finish
Location &
Identification
Sample
Type
Collection
Date Time
Bottle
ID
Lab
ID
Analysis
Requested
�n
Transfet Relinquished By
Date/Time Received By I
Date/Time
1
2
Proper Preservative Used: Acid
Received On Ice -or Chilled to V C :
Accepted ---— Rejected
Comments
Delivered By
, Base , Others ,6
Yes No
By - Comment

I In- v r c nn is -a
0-e-- � I C
MLAILING AZDRF-S5-
TELEPHONE
P.O. Box 1037
(M) 156-3934, (0,5ce)
6602 VAnamiH My
13,-2_!I,
C; 10) 392-022�- (Lab)
Wumirlgton,
CHEM'STS
North Carolina 28480
p 10) 3924424 t(rhavc)
Norib Carolina 28405
Cuj DATE SAMPL.-L): i),r" 0'. pr-.Vr.
Tomm Ale-- D /-:—: A)
At SAMPL20 BY;
ASSic r To: 1643
e
0 1
c"b
j E Al
340"A"my, /V

..` p
Il
11 I
n
u
p
N p 2pl
18.5 1-1
-
1 _
a
41
Cem
ti
jj
l-- _r — — - ` 20
x _ _ Cem--
"� v~ ,ft HERSCHEL JENKINS
' ,ryg Iju CYPRESS CREEK FARM
"IIF B
DUPLIN t =
u COUNTY
USGS QUAD: LYMAN, NC
2LII!
SPILL FLOW PATH � f — 20 —
14
Lem
cem
Cypress Creek251
AD 42'3a"
Ical 253 - (MAPLE r
-411rvey 5453 !!
{II1q 61I1my SCALE L
ElK{�1�111 MN 0 KIL6ME
1fl :G
Gn 0 MEjE'r
a~ 1 5 fl
•nn, , MILE
l nnn ,.. •lnn
trnn

y 3
ti5 vironmental Chemists, .Inc.
w tier � @ df U DRESS: TELEPHONE: SHIPPING ADDRESS:
CONSULTING M�_��p,.Be1t'1037 [phone] (Office) 6602 Windmill Way
CHEMISTS •-^`Wrightaville Beach, [phone] ('ate) Wlimington,
North Carolina 28480 [phone] (Fax) North Carolina 28405
CHAIN OF CUSTODY FOR SAMPLE COLLECTION
Client: � A f /)z l d V e Report
Collected B (signature & ri.nt) : Jam_
Y g P
Sample Type: Influent; Effl1lent, well, .roam. Soil, Other
Collection: For composite Indicate Date & Time for Start & Finish
Location &
Identification
Sample
Type
Collection
Date Time
Bottle
ID
Lab
ID
Analysis.
Requested
r et'S s &,7c F� ,-
Y� _
g
( 10
�
317 y
Transfe Relinquished By
Date/Time
Received By
Date/Time
1
2
Proper Preservative Used: Acid
Received On Ice r Chilled to 4°C:
aFepted Rejected
Comments.
Delivered
Base ,
Yes No
By Comment
Other 1 '()

AUG 81995 Mvironmental Chemists, Inc.
DRESS:
TELEPHONE:
SHIPPING ADDRESS:
P.O. Box 1037
[phone] (Office)
6602 Windmill Way
CONSULTING Wrightsville Beach,
[phone] (Lab)
Wilmington,
CHEMISTS
North Carolina 28480
[phone] (Fax)
North Carolina 28405
ATTN: JIM BUSHARDT
REPORT OF ANALYSIS'
Cu ramm' NCDEM
127 Cardinal Dr. Ext.
Wilmington, NC 28405
Din S,wrua 8 / 3 / 9 5
SAw= Rn NCDEM
Rrronr To: Rick Shiver
DAu Or.Ron r. 8/7/95
A O. 1;
Rpow 0. 10 4 3
FECAL COLIFORM BY SM9222D, 18TH EDITION (MEMBRANE FILTER)
Sample Lab No. Col/100ml
JEN 3179 22,000

ANL'`�.AL WASTE MANAG TT PL.1N CERTIFICATION FOR NEW OR EXPANDED F LOTS 1
.r.... � 1994
Please return the ccm, lated tors to the Division of Environmental Managea:ent at
the add --ass on the reVBr9e aide of this fo=.
Name of
Address:
ViAFER QUAUTY
HWUNu BRANCH
Phone No. -9)b --a -t
County: v ',n
Farm location: Latitude and Longitude: 1r ±1 1 EL (required). Also,
please attach a copy of a county road map with location identified.
Type of operation (swine, layer, dai etc.): S Y1
Design capacity (number of animals) :to D
Average size of operation'(12 month population avg.): job Q b
Average acreage needed for land application of -waste (acres): �.
--^-=c=acaaaaaaaaaaasaaaaa�aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaeaaaaaaaaaaa=a=c=cv=aan=aa=oasnaaas
Technical Specialist Certification
As a technical specialist designated by the North Carolina Soil and Water
Conservation Commission pursuant to 15A NCAC 6F .0005, I certify that the new or
expanded animal waste management system as installed for the ,farm named above
has an animal waste management plan that meets the design, construction,
operation and maintenance standards and specifications of the Division of
Environmental Management and the USDA -Soil Conservation Service and/or the North
Carolina Soil and Water Conservation Commission pursuant to 15A NCAC 2H.0217 and
15A NCAC 6F .0001-.0005. The following elements and their corresponding minimum
criteria-haue-been verified by me or other designated technical specialists and
are included in the plan as applicable: minimum separations (buffers); liners or
equivalent for lagoons or waste storage ponds; waste storage capacity; -adequate
quantity and amount of land for waste utilization (or use of third party) ; access
or ownership of proper waste application equipment; schedule for timing of
applications; application rates; loading rates; and the control of the discharge
of pollutants from stormwater runoff events less severe than the 25-year, 24-hour
storm..
Kama of Technical Specialist (Please Print) -_A*£L ir su("/
Affiliation: LIII C r
Address (Agency) : c�I G ZQ3t4j Phone No. V O - 2.46 - 7,12.1
Signature : [ , Date: 0""_ -
=aaamam=a.avacasaaaaaaaa �aaaasaaaaa=sans=aaaaaaa.. a�a=a==aeaaaaoaaaa
Owner/Manager Ag=aement
I (we) understand the operation and maintenance procedures established in the
approved animal waste management plan for the farm named above and will implement
these procedures. I (we) know that any additional expansion to the existing
design capacity of the waste treatment and storage system or construction of new
facilities will require a new certification to be submitted to the Division of
Environmental Management before the new animals are stocked. I (we) also
understand that there must be no discharge of animal waste from this system to
surface waters of the state either through a man -shade conveyance or through
runoff from a storm event less severe than the 25-year, 24-hour storm. The
approved plan will be filed at the farm and at the office of the local Soil and
Water Conservation District.
Naa:e of Land owner (Please Print) V'4cht r Te `1\ S
Signature : Date: t' C7�7 �{
Name of 'Manager, if different from owner (Please print):
Signature: .. Date:
_Tote: A change in land ownership requires notification or a new certification
(if the approved plan is changed) to be submitted to the Division of
Environmental Management within 60 days of a title transfer.
DE: USE ONLY : ACNETd# 00000Td ,
3l- �

q
14
4
Emu-
Ilk
AA

NORTH CAROLINA .�
Department of Environmental W6

Type of Visit: taCom ce Inspection O Operation Review Q Structure Evaluation Q Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: Routine O Complaint O Follow-up O Referral O Emergency O Other O Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: Departure Time: © County: Region:
Farm Name:
Owner fume:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: Title:
Onsite Representative: c-u -ffc '1hI ��
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Owner Email:
Phone:
Phone:
Integrator:
Certification Number:
Certification Number:
Latitude: Longitude:
Design current Design Current
Swine Capacity Pop. Wet Pointry Capacity Pep.
Wean to Finish I 11-ayer I
Design Current
C►attle Capacity Pop.
Dairy Cow
Wean to Feeder
er Non -La
Dairy Calf
ceder to Finish
Farrow to Wean Design Current
Farrow to Feeder D . P.oult . Ca aci P.v ,
Dairy Heifer
Dry Cow
Non -Dairy
Farrow to Finish
Layers
Beef Stocker
Gilts
Non -Layers
Beef Feeder
I
Boars
Pullets
Turke s
Turkey Poults
Other
Beef Brood Cow
Other
Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
KNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
❑ Yes
[] No
❑ NA
❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR)
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
N
❑ NA
❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
❑ Yes
�No
❑ NA
❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page I of 3 21412015 Continued

Facili Number: t - Date of Inspection: '5 /
Waste+Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in): /
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes ❑ No [] NA ❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes 0 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environment threat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? [] Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require [] Yes dNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes dNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes dNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s):
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑Yes W�4
❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes d�4
o❑ NA ❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes No [] NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes 6 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and I ° Rainfall Inspections ❑ Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes [:]No L Z ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412015 Continued

Facility Number: 3 ( - 2 Date of lns 7
pection:
24. DWthe facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ❑-]lo� ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes ❑- o;�❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? [—]Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes ❑ No NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
[:]Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative? ❑ Yes
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
N�o NA ❑ NE
❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: Date: ( (� �%
Page 3 of 3 21412015

Z7
Type of Visit: PJCom nee Inspection U Operation Review Q Structure Evaluation Q Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: Routine Q Complaint O Follow-up O Referral Q Emergency O Other O Denied Access
Date of Visit: { / Arrival Time: O Departure Time: Z Z County: Region:
Farm Name: Owner Email:
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Title:
Phone:
Onsite Representative: �/p^d `t T ems- r \ t --s Integrator:
Phone:
Certified Operator: Certification Number: 172,31
Back-up Operator:
Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: Longitude:
Design Current
Swine Capacity Pop.
Design
Wet Poultry Capacity
Current
Pop.
Design Current
Cattle Capacity Pop.
Dairy Cow
Wean to Finish
Layer
Wean to Feeder
Non -La er
I
Dairy Calf
Fi5e—der to Finish 2_2
a
Design
D , Poultry Ca aci
Layers
C*urrent
P.o ,
I
Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Dry Cow
Non -Dairy
Beef Stocker
Gilts
Non -Layers
Beef Feeder
Boars
Pullets
Beef Brood Cow
Other
Other
Turke s
Turkey Poults
Other
Dischar¢es and Stream Imuacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
E2-7qo—
❑ NA
❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
[]Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
❑ Yes
[] No
❑ NA
❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR)
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
2-1�o
❑ NA
❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page I of 3 21412015 Continued

Facility Number: - 27 Date of -Inspection: 1( 7
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in): _
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑'lees 16 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes [:3_ ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes ❑Wo ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application j^
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement? /�
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes � <0 [DNA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s):
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes ONo ❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes ❑/ NNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes to ' ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
Flo ❑ NA
❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
� "" ❑ NA
❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ]o ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and I" Rainfall Inspections ❑ Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes [:fNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412015 Continued

Facility Number: - 7 <f Date of inspection:
6
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit.
❑ Yes
[1"" ❑ NA
❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? if yes, check
❑ Yes
U No ❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge
levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification?
❑ Yes
❑ No NA
❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes
P �01__] NA
❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
❑ Yes
Z rNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
DNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
[/" No
❑ NA
❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes
U "'_ ❑ NA
❑ NE
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: }/! i
Page 3 of 3 11412015

Division of Water Resources
�"acility Number � - lii_J � Division of Soil and Water Conservation
0 Other Agency
Type of Visit: Compliance Inspection Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation Q Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: Routine O Complaint O Follow-up O Referral O Emergency Q Other O Denied Access
Date of Visit: ! Arrival Time: Departure Time: ZZ County: Region:
Farm Name: Owner Email:
Owner Name: Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Title:
Onsite Representative: L-VA*-j*_ 7e n lJ j �-_ 3 Integrator:
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Latitude:
Phone:
Certification Number: t :Z2 -3-2—
Certification Number:
Longitude:
Swine
Wean to Finish
Design
Capacity
C*urrent
Pop.
Design Current
Wet Poult>y Capacity Pop.
La er
Design Current
Cattle C+apacity Pop.
DailyCow
W an to Feeder
Non -Layer
DairyCalf
Feeder to Finish
Z
Da' Heifer
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Design Current
D , P,oult . Ca aci_ Pao P.
D Cow
Non -Dairy
Farrow to Finish
Layers
Beef Stocker
Gilts
Non -Layers
Beef Feeder
Boars
El
Pullets
Turkeys
Turkey Poults
Other
Beef Brood Cow
Qther
Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
of the State other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes ErNfo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
[] Yes �o ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page I of 3 21412015 Continued

Facility Number: - 2 Date of Ins ection:
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
❑ Yes
[:]No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure 5
Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in): -
Observed Freeboard (in): -51
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
O No
❑ NA
❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or envi onmental
threat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
ETYes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
E rNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes El"No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes 0 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes El"No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s):
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ YesN
.
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
❑ Yes
/ �No
❑ NA
❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
16b
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
0 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
/ N
❑ NA
❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑ WUP ❑ Checklists [:]Design [—]Maps ❑ Lease Agreements
❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes [3/No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspection ❑ Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes Q]No ❑ NA ❑ NE
23, if selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes 0 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412015 Continued

Facili Number: - Date of Inspection:
24, Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit.
❑ Yes
i�_l t"o ❑ NA
❑ NE
25. is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification?
❑ Yes
❑ No /E'NA
❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes El"No ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes ffNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes dNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes T No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes T/�io NE ❑ NA ❑
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative? ❑ Yes VN
❑ NA ❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments refer to. uestion # • • Explain lain. any YES answers and/or any additional: recommendations: or, any, otber; comments.
9 )
Use drawings, facility to better .explain- situations (use additional pages as -,necessary).
C t Aw 5 6 4 &N
7
e I<< i� P'^ U5 toll /3,
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Page 3 of 3
I
Phone: 10 `71 � 7,t>
Date:
214120151

Type of Visit: 99LICompliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: Y ° Departure Time: County: Region:
Farm Name:7^(��%�Q _ Owner Email:
OwnerName: („1 �T11C149! S' Phone: Mailing Address: �_ �Q�j rK S 1 �-E1 _ � A L L 4-C� , /VL p &C e
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Title:
Onsite Representative: Integrator:
Phone:
Certified Operator: Certification Number:
Back-up Operator: Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: Longitude:
Design Current
Swine Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry
Wean to Finish I ILayer
Design G•urrent
Capacity Pop.
I
Cattle
Dairy Cow
Design Current
Capacity Pop.
Wean to Feeder
I INon-Layer
I
Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish by
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Dr. P,Oultry
Layers
Design Current
Ca aci P,o ,
Dairy Heifer
Dry Cow
Non -Dairy
Beef Stocker
Gilts
Non -La ers
Beef Feeder
Boars
jPullets
Beef Brood Cow
Turkeys
Other Turkey Poults
Other Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWR)
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
[-]Yes [:]No ❑ NA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR) ❑ Yes ]❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes vvv���� No ❑ NA [] NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3 21412014 Continued

Facility Number: - Ds ection: j
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: [' C—
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in): 1 Q
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes 9No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ YesNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable. Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): [ _ S
13. Soil Type(s): 1V O V_F0 —
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
❑ Yes
o
k
❑ NA
❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
o
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
ElYes
two
❑ NA
❑ NE
Required Records &_Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
The appropriate box.
QWUP []Checklists ODesign Q Maps ❑ Lease Agreements
❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ANo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Q Waste Application Q Weekly Freeboard 0 Waste Analysis 0 Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Weather Code
M. Rainfall ❑ Stocking Q Crop Yield Q 120 Minute Inspections Q Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections Q Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes �`j No ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ✓i No ❑ NA [] NE
Page 2 of 3 21412014 Continued

Facili Number: - Date of inspection: 1 l /
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface the drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
[:]Yes �] No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
[:]Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
[XNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers andlor.-any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations (use additional naees as necessary).
Su�DCiC Sk2vr4� /0/0gPV
q VI
C,4(-I 0AA 7-1 OA-( l O/��%/v
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Page 3 of 3
Phone: g%Q )% -'� 5e0
Date: 11 f / d/� I
—r-
214/2014

Type of Visit: Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: Qf Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: Departure Time: '�: j}. County: Region: VIM
Farm Name: Owner Email:
Owner Name: Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Onsite Representative:
Title:
Certified Operator:
Phone:
Integrator: �]
Certification Number: y �3
Back-up Operator: Certification Number:
Location of Farm:
Latitude:
Longitude:
Swine
Wean to Finish
Design Current
Capacity Pop.
Wet Poultry
Layer
Design
Capacity
C►urrent
Pop.
Cattle
airy Cow
Design Current
Capacity Pop.
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Non -La er
airy Calf
airy Heifer
Farrow to Wean
Design
Current
D Cow
Non -Dairy
Beef Stocker
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
D . P�oult, Ca acity Pao .
Layers
Gilts
Non -La ers
Pullets
Beef Feeder
Boars
Beef Brood Cow
Other
Other
Turke s
Turkey Poults
Other
Discharges and Stream impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes iiNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes No [DNA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
of the State other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes ONo
❑ Yes �TNo
❑ Yes KNo
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
Page I of 3 21412011 Continued

Facility Number: jDate of Inspection:
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes j!fNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes VNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in): -
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
waste management or closure plan?
❑ Yes
;6 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
XNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes ,K No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks) 16
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes VrNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes /N9 ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s):
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes eNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes iii No ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements
❑ Yes
)n No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
;Zf'No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes PNo
❑ Other:
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. [:]Yes VfNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1 " Rainfall Inspections ❑ Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412011 Continued

Facility Number: `3 -Jrlut I jDate of Inspection:
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes XNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check [:]Yes ZNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes 9
No ❑ NA ONE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes KNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes No 0 NA ❑ NE
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes No
❑ NA
[] NE
33. Did the ReviewerlInspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes J'No
❑ NA
❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes OrNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
Comments (refer to question ft Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations (use additional pages as necessary).
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
ReviewerlInspector Signature:
Page 3 of 3
: Phone���
Date:
21412011

a
Type of Visit: (?) Compliance Inspection O Operation Review p Structure Evaluation O Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: d Routine O Complaint O Follow-up O Referral O Emergency O Other O Denied Access
Date of Visit: I 12, Arrival Time: Lib Departure Time: lGU County: Region:
Farm Name:
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Title:
Owner Email:
Phone:
Onsite Representative: M-'IC C-o- Integrator:
Phone:
Certified Operator: Certification Number: 1(,5to i
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Latitude:
Certification Number:
Longitude:
Design
Swine Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish
esiNswe.,ti eat
Wet MD—acit-v5111111111110p.
Layer I
Design
Cattle C►apacity
Dairy Cow
Current
Pop.
Wean to Feeder XL10
Feeder to Finish
9't046
1
Non -La er
I I
Dairy Calf
Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Design Current
D�, P,nult , Ca aci. P,o .
Layers
Dry Cow
Non -Dairy
I 113eef Stocker
Gilts
Non -Layers
I 113eef Feeder
Boars
Pullets
I 113eef Brood Cow
Other
Other
I
Turke s
Turkey Poults
10ther
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
of the State other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes [21/No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes [:]No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes FEr/N)❑NA ❑ NE
[3Yes NoNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 1 of 3 21412011 Continued

Facility Number: jDate of Inspection: fig
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes (3/No ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: LAC—aojJ
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? [Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? [:]Yes [�/No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes [Z/No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes [j No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes [% No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s):
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes C3r�o ❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes EJ44o ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
[:]Yes [D-No ❑ NA ❑ NE
[:]Yes F3/No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check [:]Yes [;�No [DNA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. [:]Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and I" Rainfall Inspections ❑ Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes �To ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? [—]Yes UNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412011 Continued

Faci4 Number: 3 - I'll Date of Inspection:
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes �14o ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes FfNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? [:)Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes WNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document [] Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
[:]Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface file drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
[:]Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
E6 o
❑ NA
❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes
fNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES. answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations (use additional pages as necessary).
©-Tlc( WKLtr Na.S Sande WO,30V C_4-z_otjTN NEC-o ro CL-c-A tJ ro -roe o�
t�a,2N� s•Ln :1.1.) 11"n—, �APER-WoL(L �jCZI_�. 101J IL�+USG �, UFdAYF Wfl(--A) t-FGaV£P,
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Page 3 of 3
Phone: (—m) V_M 413
Date: F f 12a=:�
21412011

I
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: % Departure Time: County: (/>rl Region:
Farm Name:
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: Title:
OnsiteRepresentative: 4AF,f7crFJ 41V011
Certified Operator: g �Cl C EaEL �/V SIN S
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Latitude:
Owner Email:
Phone:
Phone:
Integrator:
DC39 � 31 Certification Number:
Certification Number:
Longitude:
Design
Swine Capacity
Wean to Finish
Current
Pop.
Design Current
Wet Poultry Capacity Pop.
ILayer
Design Current
C►attle Capacity Pop.
Dairy Cow
Wean to Feeder
I Non -Layer
EEJ
Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish
Design CurrentDry
De. P,�ul Ca aci P,o .
Layers I
Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Cow
Non -Dairy
I JBeef Stocker
Gilts
Non -Layers
Beef Feeder
Boars
Pullets
Beef Brood Cow
Other
Other
Turke s
Turkey Poults
Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
No
x
❑ NA
❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
❑ YesENo
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3 21412011 Continued

LFacUity Number: -T471 jDate of Inspection: j
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure 5
Structure 6
Identifier: CIC-
Spiliway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑ Yes
'XNo ❑ NA
❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks) NNo
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes XNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes X'No ❑NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window D Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): Fes ct, & 6 P1
13. Soil Type(s):
U1(-LE
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
Require_ d Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
the appropriate box.
QWUP ❑Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements
❑ Yes
If
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
jgNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
ZNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes A, No
❑ YesA'No
❑ Yes kNo
Yeso
❑ Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No
0 Waste Application Q Weekly Freeboard 0 Waste Analysis Q Soii Analysis ❑ yste Transfers
0 Rainfall ❑ Stocking 0 Crop Yield 0120 Minute Inspections Q Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes XNo
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes §3 No
❑NA ❑NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑NA ❑NE
❑NA ❑NE
❑NA ❑NE
0 Weather Code
0 Sludge Survey
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412011 Continued

Facili Number: Date of Inspection: j
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
0 Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes �kNo NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? []Yes ❑ No NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes
No
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes
No
0
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
❑ Yes
� No
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
%�
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
'ANo
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes
�
t No
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
No
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑NA ❑NE
❑NA ❑NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES -answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments:
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations (use additional -pages asnecessary).
1- 43
r
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Page 3 of 3
Phone:
Date: pC
214,12011

IType of Visit: ,Compliance Inspection O Operation Review Q Structure Evaluation Q Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: outine O Complaint O Follow-up Q Referral Q Emergency O Other Q Denied Access
Date of Visit: 1 1! Arrival Time: f® Departure Time: County: �� Ll/�/ Region:
Farm Name: , pq-ESS C-e ge— �;o (LIM Owner Email:
Owner Name: 1AE Q --X--14 E L { J�� ,E JV 14in1s Phone: ��d- SS o� L40q
Mailing Address: LP9Q J A(Y)GS Uk-3AL (ACC Of / Y C 08cl b lo
If
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: t ' , Title: Phone:
OnsiteRepresentative: w�r}NrJlq °i' L�Ei�SCJf�L- �ENK�NS Inte rator:
Certified Operator: 1 `i E scwE-L �] C LlN S Certification Number:
p 1 �i J JV i
Back-up Operator: _ _ _ _ _ Certification Number:
Location of Farm:
Latitude:
Longitude:
1`4Qf?3)
Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Pop. Wet P,aultry Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish Layer
Design Current
C►attle Capacity Pop.
airy Cow
Da' Calf
airy Heifer
Dry Cow
Non -Dairy
Wean to Feeder
Non -La er
Feeder to Finish
Design Current
Dr, P,o_ul_., C_a aci_ P.o
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Layers
Beef Stocker
Gilts
Non -Layers
Beef Feeder
Boars
Pullets
Beef Brood Cow
Other
Other
Turke s
Turke Poults
Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Discharge originated at: El Structure El Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
[] No
❑ NA
❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3 21412011 Continued

Facili Number: - 'JU Date of Inspection:
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ YesA
No
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑NA ❑NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: CC.
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in): L�Q
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes ;A No ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes j No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need [:]Yes " No ❑ NA ❑ NE
. maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes C {� No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc..))
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ] Evidence
�o�f7Wind Drift ( ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): Fo5c' f'- CPS '3 �-1
13. Soil Type(s):
Ul t~CI`
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
the appropriate box.
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes 9No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
[]Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
0W1JP El Checklists 0Design [] Maps [:]Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No
Q Waste Application Q Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers
Q Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield Q 120 Minute Inspections [] Monthly and 1 " Rainfall Inspections
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes No
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes N
❑NA ❑NE
❑ Weather Code
[] Sludge Survey
❑ NA ❑ NE
o ❑NA ❑NE
Page 2 of 3 21412011 Continued

Facility Number: -31 - 0 1 Date of inspection: I J J
24. Did the fatality fail -to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is tke facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes ❑ No NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes
j�] No
❑ NA
❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
TT
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or.any other comments ,,­�
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations (use additional naies as necessarv).
GAL1W,QR
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Page 3 of 3
Phone: qJ( - -1q16
Date:
21412011

Type of Visit
Compliance Inspection
O Operation Review Q Structure Evaluation
O Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit
'1% Routine O Complaint
O Follow up O Referral O Emergency
O Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: �7 Arrival Time: /d Departure Time: County: u N Region:
Farm Name: LACJ2+ -eSS CQ-00(_ �r O N\- Owner Email:
Owner Name: IN e'Z SC if EL C • &,/K-IAl 1 P�honre:f 91d
Mailing Address: &q LQ �e i~n e_5 VA `� pIccAce , r/�`7
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: I Title:
,
Onsite Representative: 41eQ-Sca LWr4.. 3 OA -SE7V ILW 171
Certified Operator: I'� fL SC HE Lw JE/V 0A13
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Phone No:
IntegraAor: Operator Certification Number: 14n —z- '/
Back-up Certification Number:
Latitude: = o = 1 Longitude: = ° = 4
Design
Swine Capacity
Current
Population
Design Current
Wet Poultry Capacity Population
Design Current
Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Finish
❑ Layer
❑ DairyCow
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Non -Layer
❑ DairyCalf
Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Other
Dry Poultry
❑ Layers
❑ DairyHeifer
❑ D Cow
❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Beef Stacker
❑ Non -Layers
❑ Pullets
❑ Turkeys
Q2Turkey Poults
❑ Beef Feeder
ElBeef Brood Co
umber of Structures:
❑ Other
10 Other
I
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
other than from a discharge?
Page I of 3
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes tNo
o ❑ NA ❑ NE
ElYes ❑ NA ❑ NE
12128104 Continued

Facility Number: j — Date of Inspection `--�
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes No ElNA ElNE
a. if yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ElYes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?: Designed Freeboard (in): 19.5
Observed Freeboard (in): 41
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
1ANo
❑ NA
❑ NE
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
through a waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental
threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ Yes
' No
❑ NA
❑ NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? if yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN [-IPAN > 10% or ] O lbs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window //❑ss Evidence of Wind
lDrift
❑ Application Outside of Area
12. Crop type(s) fCS C=��E�P� L�94E
13. Soil type(s) /U ooLD -- Auiq�u 1 t-t-E
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes )RNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes tNo
❑ NA El NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination ? El Yeso ❑ NA ❑ NE
17, Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? El Yes ❑ NA ElNE
18, Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ElYes❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments (refer to question #) Explain any YES answers and/or�any .recomniendatrons or�any other -comments
Use drawrngs of facility to better explain'situatigns {use 'additional pages as necessary)
Reviewer/inspector Name I Rnievvb741 /V �.a., a : Phone: 9/6 -_�9%=} �
Reviewerlinspector Signature: Date:
Page 2 of 3 12128104 Continued

Facility Number: f — Date of Inspection
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes ANo ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box. 0 WUP ❑ Checklists 0 Design X g ❑ Maps El
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes �No [INA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application 0 Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ElSoil Analysis ❑NIV
te Transfers El Anal Certification
El Rainfall ❑ Stocking El Crop Yield El 120 Minute Inspections 0 Monthly and V Rain Inspections El Weather Code
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes
VNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes
JVNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
'VNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
gNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
,(No
❑ NA
❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑ Yes
❑ No
XNA
❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes
XNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑ yes
qNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31. Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32. Did Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Additional Comments and/or Drawings:
C �F U Tt c�N Dk O 1 ra
`
Page 3 of 3 12128104

Type of Visit oXompliance Inspection O Operation Review O Structure Evaluation O Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit .Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Referral O Emergency O Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: !O oQr Q9 Arrival Time: loq0 Departure Time: County: Q /v Region:
Farm Name: cs4c�Le S5 c� Ey �`HQ � Owner Email:
—� /gyp r I
Owner Name: ER SCi-1E L _����� g Phone:
Mailing Address: 999, SWmES ?J3 LA_�)A(_UgCE . NL o` dwb to _
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: 'Title:
Onsite Representative: y Ha�sct4eL.-S&WKIA'S
Certified Operator: Y'`1 E a- 5-C 14 G L U13 . , EM K +14 S.
Back-up Operator:
Phone No:
Integrator: Operator Certification Number: 1-4 n d'& I
Back-up Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: = c = i = Longitude: = ° 0 6 =
16
Swine Capacity
❑ Wean to Finish
M ❑ Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish (pLfQ
z ❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
_ ❑ Gilts
� ❑ Boars
Other
'Cu'rrent �~
:opuration M Wet Poultry .
Layer U Dairy Cow
Non -Laver 11,10 Dai Calf
❑ DaiEy Heifer
❑ Dix Cow
❑ Non -Dairy
Layers
❑ Beef Stocker
Non -Layers
El Beef Feeder
Pullets
❑ Beef Brood
El Turkey Poults
' ❑ Other
1 1 -; .
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑Yes ❑No ❑NA El NE
❑Yes El No ❑NA ❑NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes oNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes XNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
12128104 Continued

Facility Number: —a-4Y Date of Inspection 1 �1
Waste Collection & Treatment X
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ElYesNo [INA ElNE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ElYes❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: t Lj!52QA1
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ElNE
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
through a waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes �No
❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks) 10
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes No []NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application ,�(
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need El Yes f�J No ❑ NA El NE
maintenancelimprovement? _ 1
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes /0 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 Ibs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop WindowElElEvidence of Wind Drift El Application Outside of Area
12. Crop type(s) FEScuC (P) .](—� V Fe6H)
13. Soil type(s)
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
` No
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination ?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Comments {refer to question#) 'Explain a'nf'YES answers and/or any!recommendations o'r any other -comments
9 k
Use drawings of facility tobetter explain, situations;, (use additional.pages as,necessary)
•4.
CA6 I. y
P M ANpH 1�AIN S : ,; Phone: �I lid _ nl%—
Reviewer/Ins ector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: 0.w719� Date: /0L8 1 /09
121z8104 Continued

Facility Number: Date of Inspection 1�1I
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes kNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes N'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box. 0 WUp ❑ Checklists
0 Design 0 Maps El Other
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes N;�No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application 0 Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis 0 Soil Analysis ❑ yaste Transfers ❑ /nnual Certification
0 Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield G 120 Minute Inspections 0 Monthly and 1" Rain Inspections O Weather Code
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
- 23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes]
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
K Vo
❑ NA
❑ NE
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
.0 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
XNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑ Yes
❑ No
NA
❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes
I°C No
❑ NA
❑ NE
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31. Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
qNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
XNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
cApflP 1 e C24p �l C C
12128104

❑ Wean to Finish
❑ Wean to Feeder
EgFeeder to Finish
P6L10
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
JW Division of Water Quality
Y -- Facility Number ��� O Division of Soil and Water. Conservation
- - - -- Q Other Agency
Type of Visit )0 Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit 2kRoutine 0 Complaint 0 Follow up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: ,�)E I Arrival Time: ® Departure Time: County: lbkAOUN Region:
Farm Name: i CSS �� E��` �p,21'� Owner Email:: /��}
Owner Name: %�IivRSC14e w� nJt�1VILINS Phone: -110" dl25-aLI03
Mailing Address: �,9-Tot �A�'1GS Y ��A�ACC /yC 94bco
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: Title:
Onsite Representative: Q F1EL w0104 �11;�E/uKIAIS
Certified Operator: 4r25c44GL W - ScNICINS
Back-up Operator:
Phone No:
Integrator:
Operator Certification Number: I
Back-up Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude:" E--] o E__Y Longitude: [= o = i = it
Design Current Design Current -
Swine Capacity -Population Wet Poultry Capacity Population
❑ Layer
Non -Layer
❑
Other
❑ Other
Dry Poultry
❑ Layers
❑ Non -La ers
❑ Pullets
❑ Turkeys
❑ Turkey Poults
❑ Other
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
Design Current
Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Dairy Cow
❑ Daia Calf
❑ Dairy Heifer
❑ Da Cow
❑ Non-Dai
❑ Beef Stocker
❑ Beef Feeder
❑ Beef Brood Cowl
Number of Structures:
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
other than from a discharge?
Page I of 3
❑ Yes JqNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
§ZNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
N No
❑ NA
❑ NE
11/28104 Continued

FxcAty-Number: ? — �Lj Date of Inspection 1 a
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes VZNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No Cl NA ❑ NE
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: C.c_�6tJ
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in): �• y�,��
Observed Freeboard (in): y
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
through a waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes No [3NA ❑ NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks) IR
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 Ibs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Area
12. Crop type(s)
13. Soil type(s)
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination ? ❑ Yes
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes
PNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
5Q No
❑ NA
❑ NE
El NA
El NE
Comments (refer to question #): Explain. any YES answers and/or any recommendations or%'any other comments
..Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary): a
Reviewer/Inspector Name I yyj A1YQ C Phone: 9 Jo --wQ
ReviewertInspector Signature: "L. _ Date: 11 Aw&g
Page 2 of 3 1212RI04 Conhfnued

Facility Number: `3 j a�y Date of Inspection
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
the appropriate box. ❑ WUp ❑ Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Other
❑ Yes
` No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes{
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
21.
Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Annual Certification
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and I"
Rain Inspections ❑
Weather Code
22.
Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
23.
If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes
1VNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
24.
Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
jq No
❑ NA
❑ NE
25.
Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
6kNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
26.
Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
JCKNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes ko ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes
m No
'�
❑ NA
❑ NE
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes
QNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31. Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
❑ Yes
FNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
2(No
❑ NA
❑ NE
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
9io
❑ NA
❑ NE
Additional Comments and/or Drawings:
Fri
Page 3 of 3 12128104

r,
Facility Number
G(Division of Water Quality
0 Division of Soil. and Water Conservation
0 Other Agency
Type of Visit 0 ,Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit 4 Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: 1 3d Departure Time: County: i7 V pZIt) Region:
Farm Name: Owner Email:
Owner Name: —
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Onsite Representative: [iFa�UI F t_ J EJJ YTr-LS
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Design
'
Swine Capacity
❑ Wean to Finish
�! ❑ Wean to Feeder
1=eeder to Finish 103,P440
❑ harrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
n Farrow to Finish
LJ Gilts
❑ Boars
Other
❑ Other
Title:
Phone:
Phone No:
Integrator:
Operator Certification Number:
Back-up Certification Number:
Latitude: 0 c 0 1= Longitude: 0 0 0 S
Current Design Current Design Cur
opulation Wet Poultry, Capacity Population. -...Cattle Capacity aP,opie!
❑ Layer
❑ Non -Layer
Dry Poultry;..
❑ La ers
❑ Non -Layers
❑ Pullets
❑ Turkeys
❑ Turkey Poults
❑ Other
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
❑ Dairy Cow
❑ Dairy Calf
❑ Dairy Heifer
❑ Dry Cow
❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Beef Stocker
❑ Beef Feeder
❑ Beef Brood Cowl
F.
.Number.of Structures.._-�
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3
❑ Yes /No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑Yes
El No
❑NA
El NE
El Yes
❑No
❑NA
❑NE
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes ffNNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes if No ❑ NA ❑ NE
12128104 Continued

Facility Number: 3
Date of Inspection l 0
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
Structured Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Identifier: (A&-mOd
❑ Yes 2 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 5 Structure 6
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in): 37
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed ❑ Yes ! d No ❑ NA ❑ NE
through a waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? El Yes � No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes ONo ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Apolication
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes L/J No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes 9No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or l0 Ibs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Area
12. Crop type(s) F ( [r) (3 C 9 -,� G) E Go
13.
Soil type(s) _ A VTR`',y.zt 1J a Rf'-oL k- �'o rt�.3Tu
14.
Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CA WMP?
❑ Yes
�o
❑ NA
❑ NE
15.
Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
B No
❑ NA
❑ NE
16.
Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination ?
❑ Yes
�
❑ NA
El NE
17.
Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
VNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
18.
Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
2/No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Comments (refer to question ##): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use. additional pages as necessary):
Reviewer/Inspector Name �j V �{� Phone: �9f8Z6 3 �$
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: QIZA — --)&AxQN Date: i L l -5 ! v (a
Page 2 of 3
12/28/04 Continued

• Facility Number: — a Date of Inspection 1,1113LoG
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes WNo
ZNo ElNA ElNE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box. ❑ WUP ❑ Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps
p El Other
21.
Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
0No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers
❑ Annual Certification
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1"
Rain Inspections
Weather Code
22.
Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes
El
[I NA
❑ NE
23.
If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
El Yes
Zo
❑ NA
❑ NE
24.
Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
El NA
❑ NE
25.
Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
[I Yes
Zo
❑ NA
❑ NE
26.
Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
C�o
❑ NA
❑ NE
27.
Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑ Yes
2"N0
❑ NA
❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes
L✓I No
❑ NA
❑ NE
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes
[�<o
❑ NA
❑ NE
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes
L"J No
❑ NA
❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31. Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
El Yes
��
LI No
❑ NA
❑ NE
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
IJ N
❑ NA
❑ NE
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Comments and/or Drawings:
Page 3 of 3 12128104

H
Type of Visit O,C,00mpliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit CJ Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Referral O Emergency 0 Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: 1 2 a 1 Departure Time: County: D uP� Region:
Farm Name:
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: Title:
Onsite Representative:._ E4t.'i-i (:C, SbtJK3�
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Swine
Owner Email:
Phone:
Phone No:
Integrator:
Operator Certification Number:
Back-up Certification Number:
Latitude: 0 0 = , Longitude: = ° = 1
Design Current Design Current
Capacity Population Wet Poultry Capacity Population
❑ La er
❑ Non -La et
❑ Wean to Finish
❑ Wean to Feeder
© Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Other
❑ Other
Dry Poultry
❑ Layers
❑ Non -Layers
❑ Pullets
❑ Turkeys
❑ Turkey Poults
❑ Other _ _ _
E�A
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
Design Current
Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Dairy Cow
❑ Dairy Calf
❑ Dairy Heifej
❑ Dry Cow
❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Beef Stocket
❑ Beef Feeder
❑ Beef Brood Cow
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
Number of Structures:
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes ONo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes [2 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
12128104 Continued

Facility Number: 3 — a7
Date of Inspection
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Identifier: [A 27
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in): Q S
Observed Freeboard (in): 3
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
No El NA ❑NE
❑ Yes LI No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 5 Structure 6
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed ❑ Yes
through a waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes El No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes 2No I ❑ NA ❑ NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑yes No ❑ NA El NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes [ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ENo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 Ibs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Area
12. Crop type(s) � � CG rJ E (L ,,) U A k) S 6 D
13. Soil type(s) r 6 RLFo L)C
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes Q No ❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes ��No El NA El NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination[:] Yes 0 ElNA ❑ NE
l7. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes I No ❑ NA ❑ NE
�p��,✓ WO a c,oltins
Reviewer/Inspector Name I
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Phone: (qlO
Date:
l!./40/V
-t
o s-
Continued

Facility Number: ., I — Date of Inspection to?
Re uired Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
the appropirate box.
❑ WUP ❑ Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑Other
21. Does record keeping need improvement? if yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Annual Certification
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and I" Rain Inspections ❑ Weather Code
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ElYes L/J No ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes [2NNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ 0
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? Yes 'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit? ❑ Yes LJ NNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes O No ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes L,h o ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31. Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
Additional Comments.andlor Drawings:
❑ Yes N ❑ NA ❑ NE
El Yes;No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
O No
[ N
❑ NA
❑ NA
❑ NE
El NE
El Yes
Woo-
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
ff No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
f/No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
W441
❑ NA
❑ NE
12128104

(Type of Visit (!)Npompliance Inspection Q Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit d Routine O Complaint Q Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number -� Date of Visit Tune:
0 Not Operational 0 Below Threshold
Permitted Certified [l Conditionally Certified 0 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: .. -.. _.
Farm Name: �!��W�S.� �0.6F1� �rA0.�M County: Z n,LO
Owner Name:. _ .. . .. . » ..�. » ». .. Phone No:
Mailing Address:
Fadiitw Contact: ___ ----Tide: --- _ . __ Phone No:
Onsite Representative: ��1 tSO� ���+' - Integrator:
Certified Operator:.._ . ., _ .., , Operator Certification Number: -
Location of Farm:
❑ Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude • 4 " Longitude • 4 "
CnrrPnt = De.Qgn� _: Desegxr F Curren Cnrnt = v t
Swine
:Po {iPoaltr9
Po iron; Cattle
ace " Po ` t<on
Wean to Feeder
❑ Layer
Dairy
-_ Feeder to Finish
'b ❑Non -Layer
= Non -Dairy
_
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder;`
Other
-_
Farrow to Finish
,Tu#a1 D�tgn CaEy
- Gilts
ltS
Boars
TOtaI �SI.�_ V-�
IigoonS`
NQ�er,C.77
Discharees & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes O/No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field [:)Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b_ If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ff No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes 13'�o
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes [�io
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: —_.
Freeboard (inches): 3
12112103 Continued

r
Facility Number: — Date of Inspection 1
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the sitmtioa poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/mnprovement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Aoiplication
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenancerimprovement?
11. Is there evidence of over application? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Copper and/or Zinc
12. Crop type FfscciG
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Odor Issues
17. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
18. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
19. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
20. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional
Air Quality representative immediately.
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes allo
❑ Yes
❑ Yes N
❑ Yes L Na
❑ Yes [�
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes VN
Y
❑ Yes
El YesVNo
❑ Yes
[Yes ❑ N
❑ Yes [ hTo
❑ Yes !d No
❑ Yes 1I N
❑ Yes `f' o'
❑ Yes No
��F°'i ..,."^.'Y�e• +?+�'�
C+us (re% to�gpeon} Explain anyy�itF.S aaswe:s and/or any orsnpioter cammeats.:r
Use dcsvvmgs of fscity�fo >bEer pcplaun-(`additional as ) 1 E1 Field Copy ❑ Final Notes
CON - -1LAJb*- 6J C(f-O CQ►a1Trt.o{_. a F Fa-cn aep*-vivoFA 1f PA GKI 66SCOC
a
Reviewer r Name
iaj'2?
Reviewer&gwctor Signature: Date: 1 a
12112103 Confinued

Facility Number: 3 ! 2
Date of Inspection to o
Required Records & Documents
21. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
22. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
23. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below_
❑ Waste Application ❑ Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Sampling
24. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
25. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
26. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(iel discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
27. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss reviewlinspection with on -site representative?
28. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
29. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
NPDES Permitted Facilities
30. Is the facility covered under a NPDES Permit? (If no, skip questions 31-35)
31. if selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
32. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
33. Did the facility fail to conduct an annual sludge survey?
34. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment?
35. Does record keeping for NPDES required forms need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below
king Form ❑ Crop Yield Form ❑ Rainfall ❑ Inspection After 1" Rain
❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Annual Certification Form
❑ Yes (/NNo
❑ Yes
❑ Yes rNo
❑ Yes OINo
❑ Yes QNo
❑ Yes 7No
N
❑Yes
❑ Yes
❑ Yes 6 o
[Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes O(No
❑ Yes [-No
❑ Yes 01
❑ Yes M�9
0
❑4es ❑ No
12112103

y
�rr '" ���. � r ; Dtvtstcin of Water Quality x ti �
-�DtvLston of Soil and -Water Conservation {
r
Type of Visit jj Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit 6 Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification 0 Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of visit: � Time: / QQ Printed art: 7/21/2000
L- - Facility Number
0 Not Operational 0 Below Threshold
Permitted ❑ Certified 0 Conditionally Certified [] Registered Date Last Operate or Above Threshold: ...................
4104051-
pFarm Name: M Countv:..} .- G/v ............................... .!t..Q-..
_...............�..06A......... ......................... _ �.... w,
Owner Name: t� /
......��.....���4r....................� ���1.`.��..--.r-.•...._.... Phone Na:..........._..............-........
Facility Contact: .............................................................................. Title. Phone No.
MailingAddress:......-----................................................ .......
. Y
Onsite Representative:.._-.�"71, 1� j�.1�--K-" Integrator:..... CAUNIL j...................
Certified Operator: ................................................... j ............................... Operator Certification Number:,,,,,. -
Location of Farm:
Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ horse Latitude �' �� �•� Longitude �• �� ��
Design Current Design Current Design Currrent
: :Capacity Po ulaUo
Wean to Feeder
u,
Feeder to Finish
0
arrow to Wean
Y`
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Boars
ta� of Lagaoas
rail, KENN
Poultry Capacity Population Cattle . Call
❑ Layer 1 10 Dairy
❑ Non -Layer 10 Non -Dairy
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity.E:
Tgtal,SSI W-:
❑ Subsurface Drains Present:110 Lagrxm Area P Spray Field Area
No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the convevance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
c. if discharge is observed. what is the estimated flow in gal/ruin?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system'? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
❑ Yes 91,10
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes VNo
❑ Yes XNo
❑ Yes JgNo
Structure 6
Identifier: ....................................
Freeboard (inches): 31
5100
Continued on back

Facility Number: — Date of Inspection
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ic/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes �No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? ❑ Yes No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes /I No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑ Yes �No
Waste Annlication ,�(
L 0. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? El J,�.C,,Jyy No
11. Is there evidence of over application? El Excessive Ponding [I PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload A El Yes Yes No
12. Crop type z
Od
13.
Do the receiving crops differ with those designated ' e Certified Anima Waste ManaV,4ent Plan (CAWMP)?
Yes
o
14.
a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
No
15.
Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
(
QJ No
16.
Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
i� No
Required Records & Documents
17.
Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
o
18.
Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
❑ Yes
,(
o
19.
Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
❑ Yes
/ No
20.
Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
No
21.
Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
No
22.
Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
❑ Yes
[ No
23.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
�No
24.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
X No
25.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
�No
0 No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
,Z;
Comments (refer to question # Eaplam any. YES answers an or anytrecommendations,,oriany p ert comments?
t,..
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use addrtibna! pages, as necessary) 4 Field Copy ❑ Final Notes a
a r Ggc,c - /�N0 �,�A y����,o s ar, e000,
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewerllnspector Signature: Date:
05103101 T 1 ( Continued

0

Facility Number: Date of Inspection Z Z Printed on: 7/21/2000
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge attor below ❑ Yes No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes 5-�" 0
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes dNo
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes �No
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes No
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes X No
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? ❑ Yes �&
5100

Type of Visit jarCompliance Inspection O Operation Review Q Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit R"Routine O Complaint. O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other I ❑ Denied Access
—1 Facility Number Date of Visit:
Permitted U Certified r] Condition
lally
�Certified [3 Registered
Farm Name: ........4� Tp gC 5.....e.1 e R.. r �i r r'L...............................................
"�
Owner Name: . rS G�c� Jar)�� nj
Time:
)verational O Below Threshold
Date Last Operated or Above Threshold:..
County: ....D-V.01t.11
PhoneNo : ................................................. ......... _.......
� _....»
FacilityContact: ................. ...................................................... I....... Title:................................................................ Phone No:...................................................
Mailing Address
Onsite Representative:..1,', r—ke—' _ �.t1 ' PA4......i1..4�1tk. . 3 Integrator:...�Afs�iQ��f............................................._..
.............
Certified Operator: ...................................................
Location of Farm:
Operator Certification Number:
❑ Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude • 4 41 Longitude • S &6
- Design. Current
Swine Cavacitv Population
❑ Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
=_
❑ Farrow to Finish
-=
Gilts
LEE
❑ Boars
Design Current
Poultry _ Ca aci - Po�ulation Cattle
❑ Layer ❑ Dairy
❑ Non -Layer : ❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Other
Total'Msign Capacity
Total SSLW
Desiign Cairn -
Capacity- `Povulation
=1
Nuntbei of f.agoons e ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area . ❑ Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds I So1id' Tra q g y ps _ ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System -:: � •::
Discharges & Stream I, mpacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed. did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed. what is the.estimated flow in gaVmin?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3- Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
Identifier: :
Struµure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3- Structure 4 Structure 5
................................... .................................... ...................................................... .
Freeboard (inches): 3
5100
❑ Yes ONo
❑ Yes eNo
❑ Yes No
n,
❑ Yes �No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes )2fNo
❑ YesNo
Structure 6
Continued on back

Facility Number: — 2741Date of Inspection 2 61 ,
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
❑ Yes XNo
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
❑ Yes PNo
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes �No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenancelimprovement?
❑ Yes �&No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
❑ Yes eNo
elevation markings?
Waste APRlication
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes gNo
i 1. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload
❑ Yes Jj] No
12. Crop type GQYWlUd4 14pL &p,+l Vd-1 T74 S�wt 45�/',t /h 44VA C� /� 12Z ZC
13. Do the receiving crops differ with th se designated in the Certified Animal, Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
❑ Yes ONo .
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes Q140
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes J!YNO
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes XNo
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes XNo
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes )R�No
Renuired Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
❑ Yes XNo
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
❑ Yes RNo
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
❑ Yes ;Ef No
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes )2rNo
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes ❑'No
/
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
❑ Yes XNo
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes ;M'No
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes PIT40
25, Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes &No
•yi0fj%00ris'et- def d ndie5 wire pQteo during phis;visit: - Yo0 y<ii-> ftiye flo furthgr: -
cories ' deice: about; this visit:
C©mments-(refer to_question #) ;EapI' any YES -answers and/or any.recommendatirins or any othsi cozniMnents.
Use Whigs bf facilitydt6` t►elter e�tghuq situations {use addrtuiin_, pages as n ssary?
`
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: L7 Z 21ZIP I
_ 5/pp

Facility Number: �� —1, Date of Inspection
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑ Yes ❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes ONo
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes 'P3 No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
24. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes IETNo
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes lEfNo
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes )7"No
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? 0 Yes ❑ No
Additional- Comments an or ravings: _
+I
5/00

a Division of Water Quality
Q Division of Soil and Water. Conservation
O Other Agency
(Type of Visit )EFCompliance Inspection O Operation Review Q Lagoon Evaluation I
Reason for Visit Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number I
gate of Visit: f
Ef Permitted 13 Certified 13 Conditionally Certified 13 Registered
Farm Name: tr. �,rGrS C/ GL� r� f Y`1... ......... ............................... ............................
Owner Name: I _ ! �
...............
aC] Time. N Printed on: 7/21/2000
O Not Operational O Below Threshold
Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: .........................
County: Pb'
Phone No:
FacilityContact:.............................................................................. Title:................................................................ Phone No:...................................................
Mailing Address:
Onsite Representative:....!.l.e. SG!lel.....\.1.:..41.1 f......................................... Integrator:.5� gall �f.................._....................................
Certified Operator;,,,,,,,,,,,, Operator Certification Number:.,...
Location of Farm:
Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude 0 4 Longitude • =' «
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Population. Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder ❑ Layer I I I Dairy
Feeder to Finish 2 2A t9 0 1[] Non -Layer I I ❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder Other
Farrow
❑ Farrow to Finish Total Design Capacity
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars Total SSLW
Number of Lagoons MSubsurface Drains Present ❑ Lag,u+n Area spray Field Area
Holding Ponds / Solid Traps ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance roan -made'? ❑ Yes No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes XNo
c. if discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/rein? n/a
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes 9No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes A No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes /S No
Waste Collection & 'Freatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes ANo
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure b
Identifier: .....................................................................................................................................................................................................................
Freehoard (inches): 2-0
5/00 Continued an back

Facility Number: 31 —Zr] Date of Inspection a ��L Printed on: 7/21/2000
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed'? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes No
seepage, etc.) Td
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? ❑ Yes 24 No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
SM
.rrv)
7.
Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? �eS
J4 Yes
(6No
8.
Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
Eff'No
9.
Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
❑Yes
J No
Waste Application
10.
Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
1929 No
11.
Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload
❑ Yes
S No
12.
Crop type EQfrttV�[�- 11Axj-�+"�i. N�"y"I'V*7 �s+s�yrf � te,SGI� TQ S�Ure
13.
Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
❑ Yes
D9 No
14.
a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑ Yes P No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? ❑ Yes 2�No
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available? ❑ Yes 19 No
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.) ❑ Yes %No
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports) 3ff Yes ElNo
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes f'No
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes [9No
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application) ❑ Yes P No
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative'? ❑ Yes No
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ Yes �$ No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes 'n"No
�' .6., i atidris'oi' defcie;ndies •were noted during �his;visit; - You :will •i-eeeiye rio: further ; ;
corres�orideike. about: this visit.. • . . . • ............... . . .
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary):
s-Aeotd,4 Use qll �tUq;ia�1� � ; �ns Clo)� ida
%Wer /Rymi,j level 1+t ('eS�ov1�%�ic�.�;"ei ,►-ratlne�
1• G'a' L ✓o� �Je e r���, a tit 19%1 1 AM e5 e G i a !( k m a e ✓
19 �►Igs a npi�s�s hce1 4o be 44ko,) mare �.-� r�er�i 14t tv],1 e- 1VP1 rrr
G4h 6G b5eQ ,�Or Qppl�G4 t`oh tlGGV�✓!,1 jt/ i,ry 6,4da
a� elhar -n'.
Reviewer/Inspector Name s�e{ wq 1 tl t s ►
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: V 71 /, T Date: 91,q IA& 5/00

9
11

Facility Number: 31 —Z Date of Inspection QQ
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑ Yes ONo
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes XNo
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes )K No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes 54 No
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e, broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes No
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes X No
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? ❑ Yes A No
Additional- Comments and/or D rawin = -77
l'S'
3123/99

J3 Division of Soil and Water Conservation - Operation Review
13 Division of Soil and Water Conservation- Compliance Inspection
(►Division of Water Quality - Compliance Inspection
0 Other Agency - Operation Review' .
RD 4 Routine O Complaint Q Follow-up of DWQ inspection O Follow -tip of DSWC review Q Other
Facility Number _ 31 T� bate of Inspection \ qi
( Time of Inspection r 24 hr. (hh:mm)
14 Permitted [3 Certified © Conditionally Certified © Registered 10 Not O erational Date Last Operated:
FarmName: ......Gets.."....COA"......lary . ......................................................... County: ....... .1� 1!i............... ....................... ...... .................
OwnerName:........-..�iQhCSC�................... ........:M.lj►...................................... Phone No:.�.].L.....zti................-......... .................
FacilityContact: . ................................................... ..Title:.................................. ....... Phone No:...............
Mailing Address:_..-...�.�Z....��irYLl�S.....0........................ .... �.ii�GiYf.....N�.......................................... .........
Onsite Representative: �} Inte grator
Certified Operator:
Location of Farm:
Operator Certification Number:
Latitude • 6 •4 Longitude • ° «
Design Current Design Current - Design Current
Swine Capacity Population Poultry- Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder ❑ Layer I JEI Dairy
Feeder to Finish TG40 J❑ Non -Layer I I JE1 Non -Dairy
❑ Farrow to Wean -
❑ Farrow to Feeder ❑ Other
❑ Farrow to Finish = - Total Design Capacity Z-e.G
- r
❑
Gilts,
❑ Boars Total SSLW
]wumber of Lagoons ❑Subsurface Drains Present ❑Lagoon Area I[] Spray Field Area
i, -
Holdmg Ponds / Solid Traps ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes No
Dischar-e originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance tnan-made? ❑ Yes V No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State'? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes RNo
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gallmin?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes tRNo
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ER No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes No
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure b
Identifier:
Freeboard (inches): .....
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes R1 No
seepage, etc.)
3/23/99 Continued on back

Facility Number: 3 -- Hate of Inspection
6- Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any pan of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenarce/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN
12. Crop type L2Ymue�A- V�u 5Afls&I QW,b1,,.,_ C_Cky�
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
to Management Plan (CAWMP)?
Required Records &_Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freehoard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
...... yi. . . ... ..... r�... were ..... d.............r>F �. . S. Yoti wit...... Rio further .
roues ondence:ab'ufthIS YisI .. • • . :: ::: :
C6mments (refer• t6quesbo`#) =Explain any YFS answers and/or any recommendations or -any other commi
Use,drawings of facility fo better explain situaiions (use_additi no al pages as necessary)
❑ Yes W No
❑ Yes ED No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes M No
❑ Yes (] No
❑ Yes 03 No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes R No
❑ Yes 1)-j No
❑ Yes No
13 Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes L No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
[&Yes ❑ No
��-� OvrrCc.� k`�f�t� s1�wu1J �e 1o.loel,ctl ort � IRR-Z �ornnS {� stnct(� 4Yo„t. �
wl-.��. � la'ks'� Trask Sys ►s s11u�1IJ 4�. u�eJ wl•.:,t� cc�(cv(�Al�-t ..,� -� J,�� tro�Q►�-
�,�tyS � i�0-g{Q Wu�uSLS S�Ou�(� +02, �� P�2ry � ►'i''10Y�Th5,
Z5` 4�0:CG hj Mo&4s 5�•o%A �G O Spy rv-3 Av- C IK.
Reviewer/Inspector Name L- c �� i-
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: ti- Date: j I
3/23/99

Facility Number: , —2� Date of Inspection �41
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑ Yes �No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes EP No
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes {� No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes ® No
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or r
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes 1P No
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes Q4 No
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? ❑ Yes [R No
'Additional omntents'an or Drawin c
3/23/99

Division of Soil and Water Conservation 0 Other Agency
Division of Water Quality
19 Routine O Complaint O Follow-up of DWQ inspection O Follow-up of DSWC. review O Other
F{ Date of Inspection
Facility Number ( t
Time of Inspection ; 00 24 hr. (hh:mm)
13 Registered OCertified [3 Applied for Permit P Permitted JE3 Not Operational I Date Last Operated: ..........................
FarmName: .............. Lj cs.4.......G&L.......................................... I........... County:...... �4k(................................................................
Owner Name: ......... .......................................... Phone No:..... ............................................
Facility Contact:
................................... Title:
Mailing Address:......:�a �� ........ r ......... T c!, ..............................................
tt (( �S� N&
1�;
Onsite Representative: .............tx {�a 1.......jji .
............................................
CertifiedOperator;..................................................................................................
Location of Farm:
........................................ Phone No:..............................
.. ........... We*N'mi..... NG......� 4L
...........................................
Integrator: .......... %ryatk................................
Operator Certification Number: .........................................
............0t....... V.cr ...... A L:...0...... F%_.....i;....n..............a......Lvrx.u.....C.l:x(X..-........................................................................
-------------------------- -----------------......-.----.............-----.............---.............-----......................................... ...........----------.....---....- -- ....... ,
Latitude Longitude �• �' �"
Design W Current „ Desi Current Design Current
SwiIV
ne Capacity "Populahon PaWtty "Capacity1O—ppelation CattEe Capacity Populafrott ,
❑ Wean to Feeder ❑ Layer ❑Dairy
®Feeder to Finish Z(, (� 'Lh ❑Non -Layer ❑Non -Dairy
❑ Farrow to Wean
A.
❑ Farrow to Feeder ❑Other
❑ Farrow to Finish Total Design Capacity
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
' TotaI,SSLW r
Numberdf Lagoaizs I Holdrng Punds� ❑ Subsurface Drains Present 110 Lagoon Area ❑ Spray Field Area 2.
No Liquid Waste Management System . .e�
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
bi No
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
® No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
❑ Yes
No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
[A No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
N
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system`? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes.
No
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
Ep No
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes
q No
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
❑ Yes
[P No
maintenance/improvement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
® No
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
❑ Yes
14 No
7/25/97

;Facility Number:
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
Structures (Laeoons,Ilolding Ponds, Flush Pits, etc.)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
Structure 1
Identifier:
...................................
Freeboard (ft): .............1 .5.............
❑ Yes V No
❑ Yes 1J No
Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 - Structure 6
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers? ❑ Yes
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application? ❑ Yes
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type }
.? rvr�111�1�;...........lc!�fn�l....ti-A-rsa........ C Q+IY4-JAk.................................. ..................................
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)? ❑ Yes
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
20- Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
22. Does record keeping need improvement?
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
[� No.violations`or' ddidencies.werenoted-duri_ng this',visit.- Yoiimilf i-eceive-no"ft rth:ei
OfrOO]Wehce aliout this.visit. :
I9 No
EA No
[21 No
❑ Yes Ep No
❑ Yes $] No
❑ Yes M No
❑ Yes 1p No
❑ Yes No
Q9 Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes [11 No
❑ Yes Q9 No
❑ Yes ER No
L�- (\e CCAklcP, aa�s N. e"A C*bt 'iL10111J �e abseY1/V-J La9aorr LwgIs SkCUa
M� Ccrc�a. a Oeelt-1l Wo"sEt., c ���cti�;or A_tr►.A_ SKOJO I-e ;r duct to
e=-v,ea ara�t1� nVWP,PIk'C.C- ton .
7/25/97
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: ��n�_r_ ` A Date:

❑DSWC Animal Feedlot Operation Review
DWQ Animal Feedlot Operation Site Inspection°
Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up of DWQ inspection 0 Follow-u of DSWC review 0 Other
Date of Inspection �3
Facility Number
Time of Inspection 24 hr. (hh:mm)
0 Registered 13 Certified 0 Applied for Permit © Permitted 10 Not Operational 1 Date Last Operated:
Farm Name: ... lCr��Nx s........CY��� �.�...�7�rrt.............................................................. County: ....... �.1r�1�.t�....................................... I ................. -...
Owner Name: ... !"TiX��.L...... jp.bktt �tS.......... ... .... Phone No:..,(.ri.I�� 1V......Z-4- 3................... .................
...................................................... ......
Facility Contact: ..... 4-CRLI.......J-It tn&....................... Title ......... plUii%,
Mailing Address:....LZ�-...�....1��r2X.. Z�. 7�.A.. A ............................................................
Onsite Representative:.......�knx1'� ....--...-,...................................................
CertifiedOperator....................................................................................
Location of Farm:
..........................
. Phone No: ... [9Ia)..Z.�.:7tla .......
Lf.....1.11 e......................................... .. W. 44.........
tIntegrator:....... ........................... I ..................... ........
Operator Certification Number--17Z.3/.................
....TAU....... . 53...xlar�in,....... �nn.....�.:... 0.. .l.Al�,<t....1.c.�:..41a.... ....,!!1:L...#f�,r ....:SA..nQ.t �h.:..iT�rn....�'a:�.h ....a .SR..... �
7
(n..'...K........ e,e ..... [L.:...I�Z ....� h.... kn.CQ�- 'k..)t5.5....L ..... �rr...n hf...oxa.%... K.-lS :...F. �xr,...t .-.-....... .
r—^^^-1 - r---------'1 r--a _ r--------•� _ r----�I r—•••'1 Gt,�D�"GDI. Vhi It Oil r%or4kWes f-
A./il<alµµ4 I 1 {.. 1 E t anru�iai+•.�- { 1 I 1 I 1
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Population Poultry Capacity .Population Cattle Capacity. Population
❑ Wean to Feeder ❑ Layer ❑ Dairy
Weeder to Finish ❑ Non -Layer ❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder ❑ Other
❑ Farrow to Finish Total Design Capacity . (F
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars Total SSLW'
Number of Lagoons / Holding Ponds ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑Lagoon Area I0 Spray Field Area
❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes Q1PNo
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes Pj No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes EP No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ( No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system'? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑Yes [p No
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes [A No
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes KNo
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require ❑ Yes EA No
maintenance/improvement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes ® No
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge? ❑ Yes KNo
7/25/97 Continued on back

Facility Number:
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed? ❑ Yes ® No
Structures (Lagoons,Holding Ponds, Flush Pits, eta
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Yes 9.No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure fi
Identifier:
Freeboard (ft): ........7— 7........... I ..................... .
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures? ❑ Yes qNo
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes tdNo
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? 5`Yes ❑ No
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers? ❑ Yes No
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application? ❑ Yes No
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type ......... C�...
...... 6ctcmuJ�................... Lptj!L
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)? ❑ Yes FINo
17.
Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
KNo
18.
Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
ONo
19.
Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
54 No
20.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
&No
21.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
KNo
22.
Does record keeping need improvement?
jXf Yes
❑ No
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only
23.
Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
❑ Yes
9No
24.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
19No
25.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
❑ Yes
NrNo
No violations or deficiencies. were noted during this;visit.:Yo'u will receive no further
correspondence, about this.visit:
Cornet, -hits {refer to question #): Explain.: any: YES answers and/or any in recomendations or any other comments.
.Use drawiigsof facility to better explain situations. (use additional lieges as necessary);
lZ- I..ru�r wally aF lager � vlt1 b� r+o ec} 34rG 5(`` pps�ulG �t mir-eded--y i
2z_ S is r�Cards skovi t h,� w} now tam d I &J�c
at15i4_ L�r,, aes} �; kCy, am Spetite'-to."S., ay o4,
� � jj ShOdW - 6� cn 5� k. �s S It s 5kavl� it~l .
7/25/97
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: 1< .Y_ G(/�„r--�_ Date:

Site Requiies Immediate Attention:
Facility No. 3.1 - 7
DIVISION OF ENVIltONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
ANIMAL FEEDLOT OPERATIONS SITE VISITATION RECORD
-4v�,q . . DATE: '� S , 1995
Q Time:
Farm Name/Own4b,
f?7 L
o Mailing Address: C �s Z
County:
Integrator: d S. Phone: .'
On Site Representative: Y r i Phone: o� �`��
Physical Address/Location: 7;/W_ 14C,2 a
3 Type of Operation: Swine _ Po try Cattle
Design Capacity: �n Number of Animals on Site:
�1 DEM Certification Number. ACE DEM Certification Number: ACNEW
-� Elevation: _Latitude: Lon itude• Feet
Circle Yes or No
° Does'the Animal Waste Lagoon hav ufficient freeboard of I Foot + 25 year 24 hour storm event
(approximately 1 Foot + 7 inches) a or No Actual Freeboard: --5—Ft. Inches
Was any seepage observed from the is oon(s)? e or No Was any erosion observed? Yes oro
Jc Is adequate land available for spray. a or No Is the cover op de pate? Yes or
O KCrop(s) being utilized: 0h � O t" n : 4I 7 r er
Z�l t .L Does the facility meet SCS minimum setback criteria? 200 Feet from Dwellings? a or No
t� 100 Feet from Wells? �or o
A Is the animal waste stockpiled within 100 Feet of USGS Blue Line Stream? Yeo
11� Is animal waste land applied or spray irrigated within 25 Feet of a USGS Map Blue Line? Yes or&
v 4
! r Is animal waste discharged into ters of the state by"man-made ditch, flushing system, or other
similar man-made devices?' a or No If Yes, Please Explain.
u , 'Does the facility maintain adequate waste management records (volumes of manure, land applied,
spray irrigated on specific a eage with c v crop)? Yes ope�
��Additional Comments: a len exr3Gv�j�Yilt d119�J_
oh 3` leS
� � '�• / o o CJ�S
ip/ %1 rrtr exlp h'w we"r wie Cr 0
l a"'Oro
`mil Ol`OW /h4i, q fe.-n JV IJ"
Inspector Name L
cc: Facility Assessment Unit
Use Attachments if Needed.
7

Site Requires Immediate Attention
0) Facility Number:3/— 'Z-?(T
• SITE VISITATION RECORD
DATE: _`1-?�3'` , 1995
Owner: r 5e Farm Name: < <r -
County: 1101 i __--
Agent Visiting Site: h63 Phone:
Operator:
On Site Representative:
Phone: QEv-_zkr---,24U3
Phone:
Physical Address: O ►n S1K 1 ,16 a p,o x O. k rA ; 6 NE
Mailing Address: & 9 2 Tamt f . Rd
Wallace .� NL 4 L - --
Type of Operation: Swine _)(_ Poultry Cattle
Design Capacity: 2=640 Number of Animals on Site: .2 6 4kD
Latitude: " Longitude: 0 1it
Type of Inspection: Ground Aerial
• Circle Yes or No
0
Does the Animal Waste Lagoon have sufficient freeboard of i Foot + 25 year 24 hour storm event
(approximately I Foot + 7 inches) 0 or No Actual Freeboard: �2- Feet S- Inches
For facilities with more than one lagoon, please address the other lagoons' freeboard under the
comments section.
Was any seepage observed from the lagoon(s)? Yes or No Was there erosion of the dam?: Yes or No
Is adequate land available for land application? Yes or No Is the cover crop adequate? Yes or No
Additional Comments:
Fax to [phone]
ignature of Agent

Site Requires Immediate Attention:
Facility No,? Z z
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
ANIMAL FEEDLOT OPERATIONS SITE VISITATION RECORD
DATE: 7.2 , 1995
Time:
Farm Name/Owner: . /`7�YG+'L� f �l C�.1 /%Il S '2e'5'- 2 e-la
Mailing Address: - —�d1. //T--T,y • C
County:
Integrator: Chi rYo 1/s Phone:
On Site Representative: 601VPhone:
Physical Address/Location: -mac r' Nor& t{jrz ,..L d1y S� /,Pz �
Type of Operation: Swine Poultry Cattle
. Design Capacity: 96 6�6 Number of Animals on'Site: ' 3 !3 =' Yd
DEM Certification Number: ACE DEM Certification Number: ACNEW
Latitude: 3_° _' �" Longitude: _° 11 S1 " Elevation: Feet
Circle Yes or No
Does the Animal Waste Lagoon have sufficient freeboard of 1 Foot + 25 year 24 hour storm event
(approximately'l Foot + 7 inches) Yes or No Actual Freeboard: __7_Ft. Inches
Was any seepage observed from the lagoon(s)? Yes or T&o Was any erosion observed? Yes ore
Is adequate land available for spray? Yes or No Is the cover crop adequate? (! or No
Crop(s) being utilized: e
Does the facility meet SCS minimum setback criteria? 200 Feet from Dwellings?(Bor No
100 Feet from Wells? Yes or No
Is the animal waste stockpiled within 100 Feet of USGS Blue Line Stream? ' Yes or id
Is animal waste land applied or spray irrigated within 25 Feet of a USGS Map Blue Line? Yes or(2
Is animal waste discharged into waters of the state by man-made ditch, flushing system, or other
similar man-made devices? Yes orb If Yes, Please Explain.
Does the facility maintain adequate waste management records (volumes of manure, land applied,
spray irrigated on specific acreage with cover crop)? Yes or No LI
. Additional Comments: U'exc.Y� i . 1 -t & Sl / C��** �,�¢J' e Z_iye_L
Inspector Name
Signature
cc: Facility Assessment Unit Use Attachments if Needed.

•
•
[�� G Site Requires Immediate Attenti n:
�j Facility No. �!,�
5 DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
I ANIMAL FEEDLOT OPERATI NS SITE VISITATION RECORD
DATE= [1 , 1995
Time:
Farm Name/Owner:
Mailing Address:
County:
Integrator -
On Site Representative: _
Physical Address/Location:
Type of Operation: Swine s_,!!,�' Poultry Cattle
phnnP-
Design Capacity: Number of Animals on Site:
DEM Certification Number: ACE DEM Certification Number: ACNEW
Latitude:
ft Longitude: °
Circle Yes or No
tr Elevation: Feet
Does the Animal Waste Lagoon have sufficient freeboard of 1 Foot + 25 ye 24 hour storm event
(approximately 1 Foot + 7 inches) Yes or No Actual Freeboard: Ft. Inches
Was any seepage observed from the lagoon(s)? Yes o l i Was any erosion observed? Y o�
Is adequate land available for spray? or No Is the co r crop adequa e? Yes oz
Crop(s) being utilized: C c © ,o" c e��
Does the facility meet SCS minimum setback criteria? 200 Feet from Dwellings? to or No
100 Feet from Wells? 0 or No
Is the animal waste stockpiled within 100 Feet of USGS Blue Line Stream? Yes oro
Is animal waste land applied or spray irrigated within 25 Feet of a USGS Map Blue Line? Yes o N
Is animal waste discharged into waters he state by man-made ditch, flushing system, or other
similar man-made devices? Yes or If Yes, Please Explain.
Does the facility maintain adequate waste management records (volumes of manure, land applied,
spray irrigated on specific acreage with cover crop)? Yes or No
Additional Comments:
Inspector Name
S igriature
f
cc: Facility Assessment Unit
Use Attachments if Needed.