20211334 Ver 1_ePCN Cover Letter and Appendices REVISED 12082021_20211209

X% % J )
November 30,2021
George Lyle Phillips
U. S.Army Corps of Engineers
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest,NC 27587
Subject:Application for Section 404 Nationwide Permit 14, Section 401 Water Quality Certification, and
Riparian Buffer Authorization for the Proposed Intersection Improvementsat SR2320and S7lepard School
RDad,Wake County
Dear Mr.Phillips:
On behalf of the Town of Zebulon,WSP USA has completed a Pre-Construction Notification(PCN)application
for the proposed Intersection Improvements at SR 2320 and Shepard School Road project and requests
authorization from the US Army Corps of Engineers(USAGE)and North Carolina Division of Water Resources
(DWR)to use a Nationwide Permit 14 and the associated 401 Water Quality Certification for impacts to
jurisdictional Waters of the U.S.that will result from the project.A riparian buffer authorization is also requested
from DWR for impacts to Neuse River riparian buffers.
The Town of Zebulon is seeking to improve vehicular and pedestrian safety at the SR 2320(Old Bunn
Road/Proctor Street)and Shepard School Road intersection by adding turn lanes,sidewalks,and pedestrian and
traffic signals.
Shepard School Road is being proposed to be widened to include a variable turn and median lane and curb and
gutter will be installed on both sides. Catch basins are proposed along the curb and gutter and tie into the existing
30"reinforced concrete pipe(RCP)-III.The cross pipe would be collared and extended to proposed roadway slope.
Impacts to the nearby wetland will include temporary fill impacts due to roadway construction.Proposed
permanent stream impacts include permanent fill due to the pipe extension and channel stabilization in this
location.
Along SR 2320(Proctor Street)will also be widened. A proposed 48"RCP-III cross pipe would replace the
existing 30"RCP.Proposed permanent stream impacts include rip rap at embankment at the outlet of a proposed
lateral V ditch that runs parallel to the widened roadway and pipe inlet channel stabilization at the inlet of the
proposed 48"RCP-III.At the outlet of the proposed 48"RCP-III,rip rap at the embankment at the outlet and pipe
outlet channel stabilization are being proposed.A roadside ditch that runs parallel to Shepard School Road north of
the intersection will be filled.
The Town proposes to mitigate for 1,594 square feet of Zone 1 impacts at a 3:1 ratio and 700 square feet of Zone 2
impacts at a 1.5:1 ratio that will result from the project.Buffer mitigation credits will be acquired through the
purchase of 5,832 square feet buffer mitigation credits from the Kittrell Hill Mitigation Bank. The mitigation credit
availability letter from EcoTerra regarding the Kittrell Hill Mitigation Bank is including in Appendix A.Mitigation
for losses of Waters of the U.S.is not proposed for this project because permanent stream impacts will not exceed
150 linear feet and there will be no permanent wetland impacts.
WSP USA
Suite 1500
434 Fayetteville Street
Raleigh,NC 27601
Tel.:[phone]
Fax:[phone]
wsp.com

Mr. Phillips
November 30,2021
Please see the enclosed documents as part of the PCN application:
• Appendix A: Processing Information
1. Statement of Mitigation Credit Availability Letter
• Appendix B:Applicant Information
1. Agent Authorization Form
• Appendix C:Project Information
1. Table 1. Property Owner Information
2. Figure 1. Site Location Map
3. Figure 2. USGS Topographic Map
4. Figure 3. Delineated Potential Waters of the U.S.
5. Figure 4. Proposed Intersection Improvements
6. Wetland and Stream Impacts Permit Drawings Sheets 1-4,including the Impact Summary Table
7. Buffer Impacts Permit Drawing Sheets 1-4,including the Impact Summary Table
8. DWR Determination for Applicability to the Neuse Buffer Rules
9. Stormwater Management Plan
• Appendix D: Supplementary Information
1. USACE Wetland Determination Forms
2. NC DWQ Stream Identification Forms
3. US Fish and Wildlife Service Information and Planning Consultation Official Species List
4. NC Natural Heritage Program Report
5. NC State Historic Preservation Office Response Letter
If you have any questions or need additional information,please contact me at amandaJohnson(a-)wsp.con or(919)
376-2733. Thank you for your assistance with this project.
Kind regards,
+r,rr �!D
Amanda Johnson,PWS
Lead Consultant,Environmental Scientist
cc. Rob Ridings,NCDWR
Chris Ray,Town of Zebulon
AMJ

Appendix A: Processing Information
1. Statement of Mitigation Credit Availability Letter

4.
November 4, 2021
Amanda Johnson, PWS
WSP USA Inc.
434 Fayetteville Street
Suite 1500
Raleigh, NC 27601
RE: Zebulon Project
Statement of Credit Availability
Dear Amanda Johnson:
Thank you for your inquiry regarding credit availability, reservation
and pricing. As you have requested:
• HUC: Neuse - 03020203
• Bank Name: Kittrell Hill Nutrient Offset and Buffer Mitigation
Bank - 2019-1261 v2
• Credit Requested: Buffer Mitigation Units
• Credit Amount Requested: 5,832.00
• Credit Price Proposed: $1.00
• Total Amount of the Transaction: $5,832.00
• Credit Reservation held until: December 20, 2021
Please let us know if we can be of service and we look forward to
working with you!
_ Sincerel t
r, �.
Michael Beinenson
President
Eco Terra Partners LLC
1328 Dekalb Avenue NE,Atlanta, GA 30307 EcoTerra.com

Appendix 6: Applicant Information
1. Agent Authorization Form

AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM
PROPERTY LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
LOT NO. PLAN NO. PARCEL ID NO. Multiple Properties
PROJECT NAME: Town of Zebulon —Intersection Improvements at SR 2320 and Shepard School Road
STREET ADDRESS: Shepard School Road Proctor Street, Old Bunn Road
PROPERTY SIZE: 8.4 Acres
PROPERTY PROJE OWNER: Town of Zebulon
Property/Project Owner's Address (if different than property above):
450 East Horton Street, Zebulon. NC. 27597
Attention: Chris Ray
Telephone: [phone]
The undersigned, registered property/project owners or owner representatives of the above noted
property/project, do hereby authorize Amanda Johnson of WSP USA to act on our behalf and take all
actions necessary for the processing, issuance and acceptance of this Jurisdictional Determination and/or
Section 404/Section 10 permit.
We hereby certify the above information submitted in this application is true and accurate to the best of
our knowledge.
Rop Srty
oj caner Representative:
I
Authorized SignaturW
Print Name
5�lo�zl
Date

Appendix C: Project Information
1. Table 1. Property Owner Information
2. Figure 1. Site Location Map
3. Figure 2. USGS Topographic Map
4. Figure 3. Delineated Potential Waters of the U.S.
S. Figure 4. Proposed Intersection Improvements
6. Wetland and Stream Impacts Permit Drawings
Sheets 1-4, including the Impact Summary Table
7. Buffer Impacts Permit Drawings Sheets 1-4,
including the Impact Summary Table
8. DWR Determination for Applicability to the
Neuse Buffer Rules
9. Stormwater Management Plan

Property Owner Information for the Town of Zebulon Intersection Improvements at SR 2320 and Shepard School Road
PARCEL NUMBER PROPERTY ADDRESS OWNER NAME MAILING ADDRESS MAILING CITY AND ZIP CODE
2706303537 1320 SHEPARD SCHOOL RD BOYS CLUB OF WAKE COUNTY INC 701 N RALEIGH BLVD RALEIGH, NC 27610-1692
2706300773 111 SHEPARD SCHOOL RD TWIN AGRI SERVICES INC 10501 DEBNAM RD ZEBULON, NC 27597-8520
2706206369 1309 SHEPARD SCHOOL RD LUTHER M AND MARI KITAHATA 2623B FRANKLIN AVE E SEATTLE, WA 98102-3218
2706219033 1401 SHEPARD SCHOOL RD DARRYL ROBERT HIGH 1721 LONGMONT DR WAKE FOREST, NC 27587-5912
2706209765 1315 SHEPARD SCHOOL RD TWIN AGRI SERVICES INC 10501 DEBNAM RD ZEBULON, NC 27597-8520
2706217463 901 PROCTOR ST TWIN AGRI SERVICES INC PO BOX 10 ZEBULON, NC 27597-0010
2706313724 SHEPARD SCHOOL RD STARLIGHT HOMES NORTH CAROLINA LLC 5711 SIX FORKS RD STE 300 RALEIGH, NC 27609-3888
2763044997 OLD BUNN RD GRANITE PROPERTIES& MANAGEMENT LLC PO BOX 400 ROLESVILLE, NC 27571-0400

Q f W�kcl,ea
D
3
4 J.
a
o yr
N
' n
0
5t ro m
r,� N
cU
gas 2 sr C
O o
a
ArOctOe, o07,
G�
SR 2320 G
4 Old 13"'? Rd
p�,�vvgpt r e� a� •,i:i
•` t
_❑r c VC
t
SeT�A6
n
t�thec Wakeivn St In
p ary br "
O F c•cd � �
C3.31E hc•=:�_ � �
�� Lion Nit
0 r CC',t E Judd St
a. q
0c1v er S t a�
aan n Source:NC OneMap,Esri World Street Map
ran
jop e
Legend G
n 5� WAKE
�r,hitlev �•1
Project Study Area Park
0(8.4 ac.) rya N �
S7
Figure 1 . Site Location N
ZEBULQN
Intersection Improvements at SR 2320 and Shepard School Road
Town of Zebulon 0 500 1,000
Wake County MENNEW:=
November 2021 Feet

1 r
1 + J
1
1 II I;
-t
r
1 f.
ID
Ij
{ SR 2320
�^I
Legend __---- — - --_
Project Study Area I
,x.
5 Source:USGS Zebulon,NC Quadrangle 7.5-Minute Series(2019)
Figure 2. U.S. Geological Survey Topographic Map N
ZEBULQN
Intersection Improvements at SR 2320 and Shepard School Road
„ Town of Zebulon 0 200 400
Feet

1
-
WB SB (4)
WA
r1 L r
SB (3) 'Y
.r
c►r'* A-
SB (2)
4s N
tOr Sf / v N
Q-
+ O n c�'t
0
o_
71
_ a
SB (1)
2
0/d at/at/0/3 R
" d
(SR 230).
SA
# i WC
w
r�
Legend F •
OProject Area(8.4 ac.) 4
_Potential Waters of the U.S. T
Potential Wetland Waters of the t
U.S. L
0 Stream Data Form
Wetland Data Form
Upland Data Form Notes:Potential jurisdictional Waters of the U.S.and excluded waters were delineatined by WSP on 4/7/21.This map is intended for
Culvert planning purposes only and is not intended for design,construction,or legal purposes.
Source:Esri Aerial Imagery dated 12/16/18
Figure 3. Delineated Potential Waters of the U.S. N
ZEBUL0N A
Intersection Improvements at SR 2320 and Shepard School Road
„ Town of Zebulon 0 75 150
Wake County Feet
November 2021

PROJECT REFERENCE NO. SHEET NO.
188675.08 28-1
WW SHEET NO-
ROADWAY DESIGN HYDRAULICS
��. ENGINEER ENGINEER
I �AD 8� � INC'OMPLE rE PLANS
p 00 NCT'u80 POR /W ACOU15MON
S '
'A�.
DOCLFMENT HOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
■■ �D 72 ,P PLANS PREPARED BY:
4 USA
.0 TliLi0 FA]F77TF.471 1.1?$TRphT
5lI0
RAIFICE3 1t:27R91
7Y:la 1.9Ia.83G4174q
FA%,1.91 Ok4i)99
ULmNsE No.N'-Oi6Li
-00 •1 20 10 0 20 40
72•
ST`� Y, C G 7?. GRAPHIC SCALE
2
R 7 %8a� PROPOSED 2-01 72'
S 5'SIDEWALK cTo 72 rY 1'
3 7.17
PROPOSED ,
x2p 5'SIDEWALK END GRADE BEGIN OVERLAYNNDENING
+ 17.3 R_ ' STA.-L-19+05.00 STA.-L-19+05,00
o � � 3S.
J 2'-0" 2'-6"
I �
CONCRETE ISLAN C&G
rP- 11 a 26 DR,
V] y ff h fD 0. CN
L T
ry
N I I
y11. C
va 31& 9 N� N
_ O
C �
8:1 I I v
317.84 'I r
SHEPARD SCHOOL RD.
w
L-
318.87 1318.77 ,N
jmmmks
N ly r 9 Q I I r44,
— — 'n � � ---- 315.4
iv N 11 . •I all N N
n
318.261 __
o f ------ +,
319.2 2 �
/f r;
uryi I 0� L C&G PROPOSED— m y
5'SIDEWALK
+ d'+ J
2'-6" PROPOSED x Q v
C&G 5'SIDEWALK 01 ��na N N 2
M W
co
%7s 319.10 Co
Cr
'319.93 Rays •Ssps r¢n
F
s2.
C& '
C&G
PROPOSED 72.'
5'SIDEWALK ' 72
PROPOSED
5'SIDEWALK
0
m
�J
' Figure 4. Proposed Intersection Improvements

See Sheet IA For Index of Sheets NET ems,
m
N.C.1 188673.08 1
TOWN OF Z IE B U ILe O N �.�PROl.N0. P.APROI.NQ DYCBIPIfON
SXPOL234z
2374 Be
3
00 z375 PROJECT
O 100 2376 2343 s LOCATION WADE COUNTY
2455 M
\O 320 LOCATION: OLD BUNN ROADIPROCTOR STREET AND
��aec
00 264 64 z4o6 n Rd. SHEPARD SCHOOL ROAD
~ TYPE OF WORK. GRADING,DRAINAGE, SIGNALS, SIGNING
2387
64 AND TRAFFIC CONTROL NAB 8�2011
z3a4 264
96 2380 2456 WETLAND AND STREAM IMPACTS PERMIT 11-17-2021
V 2430 97 PERMIT DRAWING
rx SHEET 1 OF 4
O VICINITY MAP �S END CONSTRUCTION
-Y- POT Sta. 25+50.00
O�
C�
BEGIN TIP PROJECT 188673.08
® O
-L- Sta. 12+75.00
o
TO PIPPIN RD./
DEBNAM RD.
TO US 264/64 SR 2337
SHEPARDI-IOOL RD.
SHEPARD SCHOOL RD. END TIP PROJECT 188673.08
-L- Sta. 21+70.00
a
22
J
m
,S O
INCOMPLETE PLANS
_ BEGIN CONSTRUCTION DO NOT USE FOR R/W ACQUISITION
-Y- POT Sta. 14+02.17 DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
PREPARED IN THE OFFICE OF: HYDRA ULICS ENGINEER
GRAPHIC SCALES DESIGN DATA PROJECT LENGTH S
" I „4 ,P L5�
gj 43 E150TCVILLL LUF'k'"C
%U El HN
ADT 2022 = 6825 TLLL1° C 19601
(y TLL:1.919.836A040
IAX:1.919.836.4099
50 25 0 50 100 ADT 2040 = 9800 LENGTH ROADWAY PROJECT 188763.08 = 0.170 MI "`F Z B LON
FOR THE TOWN OF EULON
z PLANS K % = 2018 STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS
LENGTH STRUCTURE PROJECT 188763.08 0.000 MI
o D = % P.E.
*,4" RIGHT OF WAY DATE: HOLLY CHRISTENBURY, PE srcxazuRE:
� 50 25 0 50 100 T = % * TOTAL LENGTH PROJECT 188763.08 = 0.170 MI PROJECT ENGINEER
Lu** V = 50 MPH JUNE 22.2021 ROADWAY DESIGN
ERIC MISAK
PROFILE (HORIZONTAL) * TTST = DUAL LETTING DATE: ENGINEER
PROJECT DESIGN ENGINEER
r*"f
FUNC CLASS = JUNE 21,2022
New 10 5 0 10 20
���,Ep�� MAJOR COLLECTOR
PROFILE (VERTICAL) TOWN CONTACT. CHRIS RAY P.E.
ZEBULON PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR SIGNATURE:

DETAIL 1 DETAIL 4 CURVE DATA (Y-) PROJECT RARE=NANO. SHEE4NO.
SPECIAL LATERAL'V'DITCH
SPECIAL LATERAL'V'DITCH �� \
� (Nn„u scale) F IIOs ON F4RLixr
(No„.Srale)
Pl Ste /6+93.93 Pl SFO 22+8/.90 sAlaeli sllrrsr aural RAW SHEET NO.
O b N 6824 358'W a aanip ams4 2y ROADWAY DESIGN HYDRAULICS
Fill = 9.43'S2.3'(RTl = 5.37'26.2E(RTl w a FaiDLT /� _ _ W ENGINEER ENGINEER
sln,e nUn 3. s;Pe D = 3'/6'26.6' D = f 03'39.T rwllmawrA A wLen
D D L = 2972Z L = 530.05' 1J T111I + /
T = 1476..9�7/'' T = 265/2�4/'' MIN
0d PC a
Min.D= 1 F. Min.D= 1 Ft. R - 1✓50. R v 5.400.W CH •-
U
SPECIAL LATERAL'V'DITCH 7 sCCss
FROM -L-STA.14+55 TO STA.15+50 LT FROM -L-STA..18+25 TO STA.21+00 RT DS = OOMPH e = OOMPH SEE DETAIL 1 LL END CONS • CTI ,
FROM -Y-STA.14+75 TO STA.17+25 RT !'\•
FROM -Y-STA.21+50 TO STA.22+75 LT FROM -L-sTA.12+75 TO STA.14+56 TT = 3� B= NC -J -Y- POT Sta. +
FROM -Y-STA.24+75 TO STA.25+50 LT
FROM -Y-STA.21+75 TO STA.23+25 RT PERMANENT SURFACE �" + F ��'� "A,
DETAIL Z WATER IMPACTS W
SPEC;AL N.-sceDITCH TEMPORARY SURFAC C) ? NAD 83i2011 DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
Prnn, �J-
EI.P PIPE INLET . UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
s1•P. CHANNEL Q J
oo< WATER IMPACTS STABILIZATION / PLANS PREPARED BY:
roan 0 Sl C1A55 RIP RIP SPECIAL LATE ITCH I " � 434 USA
Min.D= 1 Ft. J DETAIL 5 �� / / SEED S2 434 EA 1500 ILI,E STREET
SUITE 1}}I5L�00
FROM -L-STA.18+75 TO STA.20+19 L7 / WAFACIMPACTS ' , slGti TEL:L919.836.40401
E1X:L919.836.4099
DETAIL e / PERMA NT SURFACE LICENSE NO.F-0165
SPECIAL BACK OF CURB CUT DITCH FM
(NOT TO SCALE)
RIP RAP AT EMBANKMENT PIPE OUTLET W TER I PACTS
rGRo`- t EST.8 AT
CLASS I RIP RAP 4, / CHANNEL
'� / 16 SYGF STABILIZATION IL
37 3 - SEE DETAIL 8 TEMPORARY S 6' CLASS I RIP RAP
SPECIAL LATERAL'V'DITCH WATER IMPACTS 2� SEE DETAIL 5 PIPE INLELOUTLET CHANNEL
SEE DETAIL 1 INo,to scnle)
91— E SURFACE
S LATERAL'V'DITCH W FR N IMP S
FROM -L-STA.16+97 TO STA.18+25 RT DETAIL 1 pp Y +10 TEM RV S ACE
FROM -Y-STA.17+25 TO STA.19+75 RT q(1� C 410 / WATER PACTS
TEMPORARY SURFACE SCALE 1"=�ISI WELL RY S F
WATER IMPACTS TO BE RELOCATED EZS.IP.L q0• IMPA E de=t tTOB to 4 Ft.c NFL aeo
PERMANENT SURFACE — wa Fas6IL / I IPRAP EST. Est.- 4 to a Tans at A.23+Rip Rap
WATER IMPACTS WK a PA 0DR Tul A1w1�LYris m ` U 62 2 17 SYGF -Y-STA.23+29
TERAL'V'DITC a pp•y p roar •S'B'RIPRAP , 7 S SEE DETAIL 8 SCALE 1"=50'
SE AIL 4 PLI ypspp• EST. INS ��� er REFER TO SIGNING PLAN
SCALE 1"=
iiRai EST.7 s y a SHEET SIGN-X FOR SPEED c�
-L- POT Sta.12+75.00 PO WN m 0 a WARNING SIGN LOCATIONS
\ el
BEGIN PROJECT 188673.08 SPECIAL LATERAL'V'DITCH XIS SIGN a
Z SEE DETAIL 1 T E EM VED y N
O IPE OUTLET C LASS'Bl P
H NNEL _
ST IZATICFEMPORAR SURFACE ^ e •- 1.2 SYGF -L- POT Sta.21+70.00
CLAS RIW4bTER IMPA smb ~ nr / $ SPEC) I T'V DI END PROJECT 188673.08
L+25 SEE DE L 6 0
65' L+30 PERMANENT tI R RAP EE DE
© ['!*40 65, WATER IMP T EST.2 T F. 15" j L+36 z
f!f. VY 40' EST.7 SYG RCP-III 55' 55'
tiY •- E ` E E EX.RW EX.RW J
• E E +a\\ \
- LLAR - _ Aw" ,a SHEPARD SCHOOL RD.
RETAIN O �� MOVE - REMO Y•Blr 'L
SR 2"SHFMAIdD RIMSYPEISIIC RiIY - RETAIN _ W
B•RCP b•RCP O M O G_
O
- 24 y+y(T El 80z p
I -- ��++f�,, 0 C JI III —
1 2 A��i L+50 C C s L+55 S
•V � '.
s s C 5 SPECIAL LATERAL'V DITCH .. •• 4—
EX1 i00rt 1 •.
/ - 40' SEE DETAIL 4 _ .RW \
PUBLICS WAGE EASEMENT
CLASS'B'RIPRAP
NS
24 M 50' %6� EST.7 SYEST.2 OGF N\
RCP-III PECIAL LATERAL VARIABLE WIDT •ASE DITCH
.10 TONS CLASS B RIP RAP
EXIST SIDEWALK DETAIL 7
L+15 TO BE REMOVED 40' REMOVE 51 LF PET , L- POT Sta.16+65B5 = -L- Sta.19+05.00 $ PERMIT DRAWING
24'RCP -Y- PC 570.20+14JO END GRADE
/ /c F BEGIN OVERLAY/WIDENINGgZ PER ANENT SURFACE
ISIi( EXIST SIDEWALK -Y- PT Sta.18+42J8 SPECIAL BACK OF CURB DITCH ER IMPACTS SHEET 2 OF 4
BOYS A GNU TO BE REMOVED A J SEE DETAIL 3
ID EA
Clue OF ZEBUL0N 3
em cum O CpMY Is1Asf `� / DETAIL 6 DETAIL
Ili 01!2 Ps 8
CCsf PIPE OUTLET CHANNEL RIP RAP AT KMENT
PN mOfi0f7N RETAIN IN-.scale) No,ro scale)
/ NcwraL to'min.
-F to Di�eh
ADJ.C / �pda +u� w�''.• \ G de To'm ts„
�N
GEOTEXIILE
ar �/�• Length= 10 F. rva ob1�Fo
IDq d= 1.25 Ft. Type of Liner= Class I Rip-R.P
1•s CA FORMULY i a'� Est.= 5 Tons of Class B Rip-Rap FROM -Y-STA.22+68 TO STA.22+83 LT
\
F>NM IDCr.9MSN ssowl I•s a K LLEN -L-STA.14+57 LT FROM -Y-STA.23+15 TO STA.23+29 RT
P a aeeio p IIILm NaSTFA0.N A •M. RETAIN
PtDn� III� a /J DETAIL 7 rr rr
p amr PC aowP SPECIAL LATERAL WARIABLE WIDTH BASE DIT INSET A
171 Dauaella
� L� 1•\ � z (Not to Scale)
A IMUM DEPTF'
• O ,II E E h
SPECIAL BACK OF CURB CUT DITCH NCRET
roUn 'o et Slope SIN E Mq
SEE DETAILS D P IIOs�• yA P Li
orm
�s. 8 1
O Geo,exrle B Min.D= H. °"•* 1: 47 HF 7�q
TAIN _F T NM Olt FC•DLY Max.d- s Ft. �
MR IS
T I B= V ie y EXIST SIDEWALK MAWASA Ir LLC A Type of Liner- Class B Rip-Rap (Ft) RET WAGE PROPOSED
'
/yq Cq Y ADJOINING _ E TO BE REMOVED Cs CsaPC OOM FROM STA.21+00 TO STA.21 -L-RT /
c m M YYissDCPST B AD I&C
'M
DDOis! /
C c SE T 'V'DITCH LEGEND 3M24•
SC SEE DETAIL 1
E DETAIL 1 /
DENOTES TEMPORARY
VNBZ A j•H O,/Sys FILL IN WETLAND `t*. / a Fsasl<r
�� THIS ® DENOTES
WATERTS IN BEGIN C T MUL1Iuo�T ILLC•
DENOTES TEMPORARY �� 2.17
O 4 c•�
u-H� C IMPACTS IN SURFACE WATER �Q(J

/ } ' - \P '- �) ✓\ ry_ PROJECT REFERENCE NO. SHEET NO.
— / _ CURVig DATA-(—Y-1 \ \ ` \ \ \ �bZF 18W3M 4
/ SPECIAL LATE 'V, U2Ff SpEC77 L -/^ 1 ! L( I ( > \ \
\ tis Na al LSA "�16i a
m d M1 r _- - V Nar\sow / I p/�p +93.93 1 / \ RW SHEET NO.
,,. J y \ \ — w N Ow21,' ROADWAY DESIGN HYDRAULICS
1` t-8
-/9'43 523' Rf� �� = 5'37'262'(RT) , ! / \ \ \ Eal _F;II 1 �� T \ ) L ENGINEER ENGINEER
0 7 s D o�r f Slone .00�J , ote�\ sioas w�✓ /Y ����/'��/`yy.'T/( / D s r 03'39.T l T ~ /\ \ \ \` ry /L YG/ �. 3>- s f /'Y / _ / T _ l (\ / T = 26524'J / Min.D) 1 H. -w J Mlv D=3zFr.- /! // - 1 ✓ = 5.400.010'
�{ PECIAL lRI'MAL'/s DITCH
l FRkOM 4k STA.14�++66 TO-STX 15+50 LT \J _ /�' \✓ -DS = 40MPH /1/!/ EE DETAIL 1 �!s� L END CONS CT '-"`�✓\ \ ^ \, ' / r
FROM -L-ST 18+25 TO S 21+00 kT r /
322-v
FROM STA. +75 T STA.17+2 lil o q.. h�- "�-- t f
/ yt ON FROM -L-ST/(.Pl +40 TO STA. 5.k50 Rl'� s . i e= Nr. / \ - -Y- T Stagy
'FROM Y-STA.21+50 TO STA.22 LT 1\m'�b' �/ i'c n\ ` \ + / - _ A'- ' ON \,�
FROM\Y-STA. 4+75 TCS STA.25t+50 LT FROM 1-L/STA.1 �75 TQ\STA..L4\lflA 8.,3zo-/ ! /1 w !/' , \ r \
¢ROM 1Y-STA?21+75 TQ STA. 25 RT L / FEE N,E'NT SORFACE
>DETAIL 2 w ,�TER'I/v�PA4\TS
I ! sP IAL CqT DITCHI a ! \ o-�� //' Scj \/ _-^ ` ? D ff�'16 \
�/ / 11,p7. \ , �' / h�31du l / I 3 V
\ I Notto�eol.l \ � ,♦w 3ii_^ -�� / O ^♦ �a-� DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
E.Y T)�MP01tAR�` SUR�JYI. ^_.\_ -- __
DBNR' ., \' -` \ �� �4+cf� �1'iPE INLET- f n / v r 1�-t - UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
�•L 'l �NATER IIv1P PLANS PREPARED BY:
\ / I slog ^ !� — CHANNEL ^ `
e< r�,r STABILIZATION / ,/ ♦ ,E pp \\ \ 1\
r`aa P ♦ r ai/ T o� \ bJ b / 7� CLASS RIP RIP ! 40 "
( m`\1\ S"&"�.� / / 1 --r 1 SPECIAL LATE ITCH \ WSP USA
DETAIL 5 //' / SEED n \ aJ 434 FAYETTEVILI,E STREET
f I > \ 1 // //- / / / \/ \ PERMANE / 2 \\ as- SRALEIG1500
}L NC 27601
FRC -L\STA\18+45 TO STA.2 +19 LT \"' m / \ / - SURFACE i.LR' / ` TEL:L919.836.4040
�'` \ g ) 1 I \r J2\=a y // ^1 } \\WATER IMPACT/5 > \_ 1✓' •. ^\ 1 FIX:L919.836.4099
�) ` \ \ \ J\ I \\ f / i -` / / - \ \'//L' 6 III �,_ LICENSE NO.F-0165
SPECI),t BACK'OFICIJRB CUT DITCH ( ! 4 a , yy ( ,, ��,� R°O / b /t / PERMA NT SURFAtt
(N�tE10�SC.rlp\ \ \ T.. , , A RCP-II '7' W TER I PACTS 1 '� \ \I `� �33A_w
LGROUN� / r\ L\ \ \ t RIP RAP AT EMBANKMENT / 1 l �tl y \
NATUEu '-'� 1 I ( \ / >'•^^� \- \ EST. TONS CLASS I RIP RAP 4i / P E OUT ET a
y�' yat \ /♦ SE 5 F CLASS
I RIP R - \ DETAIL 51
SEE DETAIL 8 TEMPORARY SURF CE B CLA55 I RIP RAP PIPEINLL .CFWNNEL2
\ \ SPECIAL LATERAL'V'DITCH WATER IMPACTS 2 SEE DETAIL 5 l v \ �\ \ } \ \ 4 •tin^
` vu ✓ ! \ SEE DETAIL 1 SURFACE / \ \ \ \I I`,a. ) \
\ No1� Scale
S LAT,E�.I,",�DITCH _ W R IMP S \ \
FROM -L-$T .16+91 TO SL11,18,F 5\Al\ DETAIL71 \w --_—` Y +10 E
FIRW -Y- 17+25 TO\STA.IQY+76$Tzz\L..,\ q�� V J 45, - WATTTTTTEEEEEERRRRRR``II PACTS ^�/
i :t, fEMPOftARI�IS � C�E — , , SCALE 1"=NiCIST WELL 1 \ R I'$ F' • \ S•\\
\\ A : TO BE RELOCATED f• ) l \/ 44.6' \♦ \ LenOth= 1�F. Iv4f amel \ , Ll�r
WATER IMPACTS /! =e� — ;v /, \ ' ' IMPA E ! , d= 'FOB ibd4 Ft. D \
PERMANENT SPOA�E >,' , — t EST. \Est.— 4 to 8 Tons 0r cuss 1 R�RDp\ \
4 I M ) �'tt w F111BIL f _ / CLA B'RIPRAP °9t i3 \ \
LNER IMPACst�S TERAL'V'DITC \_ r \ / 'RIPRAP O ESL 7 S N e SCE DETAIL 8♦ CALE�"-5 \ Y S71A.2 ti9 \ \ \ \\
I I l I Mao®� \ _\ \ 2 + s\ >,\\\\
s �� ; SEE AIL a ^i// ! /Espy 7 s Ns / �v dr \ \ REFER TO\SIG G P�N
t r r 7 1 h 3, $HEET\SIGN-Y�FOR\St?EEDE \ \ \ ". \
� � T SCALE\1"=50'"w oll: \.\ \ ,'d w R \ I �, �f °\ \ \ \ ` ..
/ d ro ) } .aE/ \ WARNINb,SIGN LOCATIONS, \ \ \ �3a \
g Lr -L OT Sta.I 4/75.06 \ �5 z � w / \ 0\\ \\ LEw \a ����e I'� t \ \ ,\ \ \ \ \\ \ \� \L
w ! B IN PRP) CT 1 86 w3. w a /SPECIIAAL LA ERAL'V'DITCH XIS fC,N
Z u l ry •'L �+ 1 / SEEIDETAIL 1 T E EM VED J \ \ \ o a-` \ \ m \�, \ \ ♦
O a w w" r /I �tL \ I~ IPE,OUTLET / / a` �.' /' CP \ \ \ \ \ 'DG455\\\`BBCC,RIPRAP m \ \ Ll` �a� \\ \\ \ \ '4,\ \\ \3Z0
NNEL / B-
wr 1 / \ \ \ eo -L- POT Sth.2 70.00 ~
kP' ( ST IZATIQEMPORAR SURFACE q \ \ \ SYGF
I L� CLAS RIM6ATER IMPA TS H ti / a $ ,�� \ \ ,� \ \ \
mNm'V \ \\ \ ' MD P QJE \18813.08` \ \ \ e
40' 65- AT IMP T ST.
R$Cg-III
EXAW EX.RW\ \ \`'� \\ \\ \\ •„�\1
I��TJ / I rv' /^ - LIAR J _ IF11171L \ .\ - ^_ 90 SHARD'ACH'O'OL
94
MOVE
\ RETAIN —i—�--�r�—
/ BYFU61i RN'Bly o -M o RETAIN
rRcp/
1 a \ r \ \ C
I
SPECIAL LATERP(L lV DITCH \ 1• •\ \ c- 41.1' �\�{c'• •\ l \, n I o� S 1 \
. SEE DETAIL 4 , \ - . EX �� �" ! 1 ( > 1
ter+ w
[_ _�________�/ Vi hIBLIC RCE EST \ - r
\ L�LA55'B'RIPRAP
\� x�t Irlll I / j 11 I za" \ 50 \\ \ ET1.2TON5 \ \ \ 1 y`I eoc---- /// oN �♦ moo. 9=\�9.� ) \\
\ ES 7 SYGF �pwt l
RCP-III \ \ \ ; \ ` \ \ - PECIAL LATERAL VARIABIPIDT �QSE DITCH ♦ sr c \ \ 1 z
\ \ .10 S �>jM'RAP
/EXIST SI WALK _ \ - � \
T9 BE REMOVED
1 / \ /• 1 1 1 �' ��• i� �^
ao ----_/ / / / tE r - POT S�G.16+B5B8 =1 t L-St 19+ AO - 1 g \ f REMOVE 51 LF
L � I , ! \\__-^---- /^^_4„RCP C - w \ 1 - 1 / a \ �,/� `'je�
N l _ -\PC 2O D GRADE/ t Y� r - t \ P1� Y'�II\I�IV',,,3
' T\�1 IjkFACE \
c \ I I \ 1 _ - A GIN OVERLAY/WIDO"NG I 8 p �(`�- °3 C��.y■SFr Tb \ A
e I 1 \ \ f\ \ `A'e\\ /\\/^` ` T SIDEWAL \ / r- PT 570.�8+42IQ ��fi SP�CIAL \CK OF URB DITCH „ t3 - U •'4TS �/ S 1 1
1 1 1( \ \ $$ A 1. SEEI DETABIL�3 \ \ /
\ l BOYS AND 1 \ -.°Ze - \i,TO BE REMOVED
I\♦ \ i CLUB OF ZEBULON, rz \ q � \
1 \ az I I I £ \ �\ \ apII• LJ - tbETAIL1ui\ DETAIL8 \ � \`E
PIPE CUT LEf CH NNEL , \ \ a , RIP RAP AT EMBANKMENT ti\ 3os \
RETAIN �p' \ \t t IN o Scaler Norro Scole) ZC` \ ^
�1 C T 1\ �1Do t w )wwo� 0-m �v
1 7 ! DB m r+
ADI.C " O� E �? ' 1< 1 \\ 1 e \ \ \ m., `l L `�+� m�v`Stcicrod TOa, 15• i� v,
JOT-L
Length 10�. ` al,I,ieO` 4 .d^ 1 \ 1,\�w \ ^ s , t,-• ♦ ,w
d= 1. Ft. \ \ Y S``= I ` T �sQ{ Ri Ra /
F•awLT L. I/,� :'• ! lw I st.= 5 Tons ofClass B IRip-Rapt \sl w �' 1 �'♦ t^ w� r P me S4— y"r r P
w1N TIIO.•YaN wtlik w / e� 2 & s' (� # 22+68 TO $A.22+83 L
tw w Fa•wLV / W i ! \ Y -L-STA.14+57 LT \ R w L ,`` -\ z t. G'b L�\ti y L ^' -•-@'^ +ffi TO STA.23+29/RT
w D7M..w�..w�..O�wlt NAISTFA0.WNt MlDl,fl!►. RETAIE� N \ N -j '�+l a � ,.x,\
\ �1 wws w� / // � �, >I 1 AI _ ,\ a 1 _ L INSET "Arr
\ \ 1 y\ c w FY 17w10®O da L3 ! ( I SPECIAL LATERAL WARIAE6E WI�9V-I 8,6SEb uy N\
;" Y (Na to seal.) -, �'
� - ..-./`_ re\ �,~\ \ • !P` / /�/// / � c'4'\ \ \ \ s I )\ °' ►B 1 �'^'t'.'\:.:,a a NCRETE`CA h
9 — SPECIAL BACK OF CURB CUT DITCH ` rou :l sio w ^ , ►\ /°9'wsr SIN — IIOa w i'a•YST M
SEE DETAIL 3 Pn \ I D 'G� 9�L` ♦ 3� ems' nt `' WIY ILLIDI wR. q TCN
B \") l ( y v �ITTt Y
\ `• a `r r 7 J l \x` L\ \ \ J� w ww Fo wso 'r rr
3z6/6- • Ze-.. \ , \ 1 ,y Min.D= H. a FY 1Taaloww �, F r
AIN I1K w w l �� ° 4 \ /(l \ w a ;�z 44 7
(e R TAI .0.' O wlwlL \`z \ \ x.V e FI \ I °I \/\ c w
MA W9 I \E PROP v y E�CIST SIDEWALK/YYYwIwIF 11C \ Type"L'er= Glass\.$Rip-Rap / V ) w �JY i 1 \ ( I RET 7
A�' m TO BE REMOVED fm awYM oowo u � \ D INAGE ROPOSED � q
w ``(i V ADJOINING PRPJEC - m to,M= I ? FROM STA.21+00 O ETA.21 -L-Ri I !m _ �> BY AD b'�PROIf
CWTIR
SFF ? wt&/ t� pa
I'll 1_ '>2 1 LEGENDN.�, F1Lnacwaw/
f N`SFT i ^/� SEE DETAIL ETAIL 1 RAS DITCH R klRw si w \ C l \ \ ) \ 4 q
I-fe¢ A I �S ro&,' DENOTES TEMPORARY
vxez ^I T� / 0/s J�1 Pa / w i, 1'�\ ti ®FILL IN WETLAND �( / 1 IN Falaeu'
vww i i .� ll �s 1`0' \ /320� tl� 1 e� .c FROPEtT s•
etyN T w R!ti S� - DENOTES IMPACTS IN BEGIN C TRUCTI wYYYtmYLLc
�� Nrs S, ., ,�� \\? �� ® SURFACE WATER _ O 4 -02.17 / r.
® DENOTES TEMPORARY Fill
`�C IMPACTS IN SURFACE WATER 1
(efeeJ � , •�IFL a

WETLAND AND SURACE WATER IMPACTS SUMMARY
WETLAND IMPACTS SURFACE WATER IMPACTS
Hand Existing Existing
Permanent Temp. Excavation Mechanized Clearing Permanent Temp. Channel Channel Natural
Site Station Structure Fill In Fill In in Clearing in SW SW Impacts Impacts Stream
No. (From/To) Size/Type Wetlands Wetlands Wetlands in Wetlands Wetlands impacts impacts Permanent Temp. Design
(ac) (ac) (ac) (ac) (ac) (ac) (ac) (ft) (ft) (ft)
S1 -Y-23+30 LT Channel Stabilization < 0.01 < 0.01 16 36
S1 -Y-22+70 LT Rip Rap at Embankment < 0.01 < 0.01 13 9
S1 -Y-23+30 LT Stream loss in 48" Pipe < 0.01 7
S2 -Y-23+30 RT Stream loss in 48" Pipe < 0.01 22
S2 -Y-23+30 RT 48" Pipe Oulet Stabilization < 0.01 < 0.01 16 7
S3 -L- 14+42 LT Stream loss in 30" Pipe < 0.01 < 0.01 16
S3 -L- 14+42 LT Pipe Outlet Stabilization 10 7
S4 -L- 21+24 RT Fill Slope Over Ex. Ditch < 0.01 38
W 1 -L- 14+42 RT Construction Easement 0.02
TOTALS": 0.02 < 0.01 < 0.01 138 59 0
*Rounded totals are sum of actual impacts
NOTES:
NC DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
11/17/2021
Permanent Surface Water Impacts: 286 SF Wake County
Temporary Surface Water Impacts: 146 SF 188673-08.01
Revised 2018 Feb SHEET 4 OF 4

See Sheet IA For Index of Sheets NET ems,
m
N.C.1 188673.08 1
TOWN OF Z]EBUL®N �.�PROl.N0. P.APROI.NQ DtlC9IPIfON
S\ppertRd ,n
2374 2 se
2343 0� PROJECT WAIMCOUNTY
O LOCATION
•
7�
a oiae� LOCATION: OLD BUNN ROADIPROCTOR STREET AND BUFFER DRAWING
00 264 n Rd. SHEPARD SCHOOL ROAD SHEET 1 OF 4
~ TYPE OF WORK. GRADING,DRAINAGE, SIGNALS, SIGNING
NAD
64 AND TRAFFIC CONTROL 83'20»
• • 1r1 264
`j `�• 96 97 BUFFER IMPACTS PERMIT 11-18-2021
v O
VICINITY MAP 8 END CONSTRUCTION
O -Y- POT Sta. 25+50.00
,`hO
BEGIN TIP PROJECT 188673.08
\-L- a. 12+75.00 g 1
2 �
Q
TO PIPPIN RD./
/ DEBNAM RD.
TO US 264/64 SR 2337
-L- B3 SHEPARD HOO' RD.
SHEPARD SCHOOL RD. END TIP PROJECT 188673.08
-L- Sta. 21+70.00
a
J
m
� O
O
INC®MPLETE PLANS
_ BEGIN CONSTRUCTION DO NOT USE FOR R/W ACQUISITION
-Y- POT Sta. 14+02.17 DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
PREPARED IN THE OFFICE OF: HYDRAULICS ENGINEER
GRAPHIC SCALES DESIGN DATA PROJECT LENGTH " N I „SP—,
gj 434 F.4Y4:1Tk: LE STREET
SUITE.1500
KtLEADT 2022 = 6825 TEL:
NC I9601
(y :—1,119111,4140
I�AX:1.919.836.409Y
50 25 0 50 100 ADT 2040 = 9800 LENGTH ROADWAY PROJECT 188763.08 = 0.170 MI C1:V65
Z
FOR THE TOWN OF EBULOBULON
z PLANS K %D °/Q —
LENGTH STRUCTURE PROJECT 188763.08 0.000 MI
2018 STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS
o = P.E.
RIGHT OF WAY DATE: HOLLY CHRISTENBURY, PE srcxazuRE:
% 50 25 0 50 100 T = % * TOTAL LENGTH PROJECT 188763.08 = 0.170 MI PROJECT ENGINEER
�*w V = 50 MPH JUNE 22.2021 ROADWAY DESIGN
ERIC MISAK PROFILE (HORIZONTAL) * TTST = DUAL LETTING DATE: ENGINEER
(n*Z PROJECT DESIGN ENGINEER
New 10 5 0 10 20 FUNC CLASS = JUNE 21,2022
,Ep�� MAJOR COLLECTOR
PROFILE (VERTICAL) TOWN CONTACT. CHRIS RAY P.E.
ZEBULON PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR A, SIGNATURE:

DETAIL 1 DETAIL 4 CURVE DATA (Y-) PROJECT RARE=NANO. SHEET NO.
SPECIAL LATERAL'V'DITCH \ /WV/J�IV
SPECIAL LATERAL'V'DITCH
� (Nor ro Sc°Ie1 =Y Ip ON FONELY
(Nor ro S,.Ie)
Pl Ste /6+9393 Pl Ste 22+8/.90 a BN�ED eArlsl wt RAV SHEET NO.
O b N 6824 358'W ae•ow OOtY4 DESIGN HYDRAULICS
2y ROADWAY;II = 9'43'S2.3'(RTl = 5.37'Z6.ZE(RTl 0 w qt FOIBELT /� _ FINENGINEER ENGINEER
_ W
o slF Oe" 3 J— o e` s;pe D = T/6'26.6' D = f 03'39.T rwllmawrA A LUfM
D D L = 2972Z L = 530.05' 1J ITAMT` + /
T = 146..97'' T = 265/�24/'' 06Dw PC am
Ft.
.
Min.D= 1 Min.D= 1 Ft. R — 1✓750./ R v 5.400.W CH '• •-
U
SPECIAL LATERAL'V'DITCH 7 BOOOi
FROM -L-STA.14+76 TO STA.15+50 LT FROM -L-STA..18+25 TO STA.21+00 RT DS = OOMPH DS = OOMPH SEE DETAIL 1 L END CONST
FROM -Y-STA.14+70 TO STA.17+25 RT FROM -L-STA.24+40 TO STA.25+50 RT @= 3y @= N(. -`• /
FROM -Y-STA.21+55 TO STA.27+75 LT FROM -L-STA.12+75 TO STA.14+56 LT -Y- POT Sta. +
FROM -Y-STA.24+75 TO STA.25+50 LT
FROM -Y-STA.21+75 TO STA.23+25 RT
SPECIAAL CUT DITCH NAD 11 DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
(Nor ra sc.I.I I ?(� �^2�
Fr°"' PIPE INLET UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
Ditch
sl°Pe CHANNEL
0 oc / PLANS PREPARED BY:
roan D CIASSI RIPO P
Min.D= 1 Ft. SEE DETAIL 5 BOODS 7A� / SPECIAL LATERAL'V'DITCH " 434 USA
�Jl' SEE DETAIL 4 434 FAYETTEVII.LE STREET
FROM -L-STA.18+75 TO STA.20+19 LT BUFFER DRAWING SUITE 1}lIL.N
-� / 5 TT�L919.836.40401
40' FAX:L919.836.4099
DETAIL 3 9 Y +55 SHEET F LICENSE NO.F-0165
SPECIAL BACK OF CURB CUT DITCH PO• 40•
(NOT TO SCALE) 1178 FOIBELY
RIP RAP AT EMBANKMENT .�! PIPE OUTLET lEl AaSEltlflB
NATURAL EST.8 TONS CLASS I RIP RAP / CHANNEL
rGROUND
16 SYGF STABILIZATION OB IN 0 K�" IL S
37 SEE DETAIL B 6' CLASS I RIP RAP tll YIMLME PIPE INL�ELOUTLET CHANNEL
SPECIAL LATERAL'V'DITCH 2� SEE DETAIL 5
SEE DETAIL 1 (Nor ro scalel
SPECIAL LATERAL'V'DITCH wom
FROM -L-STA.16+97 TO STA.18+25 RT SEE DETAIL 1 Y +10 2' Y +50 ' a
FROM -Y-STA.17+25 TO STA.19+75 RT
4 65'
EXIST WELL Y +1 Y+2 to / 40'
TO BE RELOCATED S0 / Len th= 16 F. c NEL BED
0' 9 rvnn°hlel
40' Y +0 RIP RAP AT
5 EMBANKMENT d= TOB to 4 Ft.
5
110�alOIB� 55', EST.B TONS Est.- 4 to a Tons of Class 1 Rip-Rap
IPRAP CLASS)RIP RAP
YGF
SPECIAL LATERAL'V'DITCH IBM A3 / , U ell S 2 S SEESDETAIL 8 -Y-STA.23+29
/� 00 004A7 p WO S'B'RIPRAP
SEE DETAIL 4 1'J 1 ypFp EST. NS �c?� +So, ar REFER TO SIGNING PLAN
EST.7 s a SHEET SIGN-X FOR SPEED c�
-L- POT Sta.12+75.00 a Mill m Y +530° o 4 M \ el WARNING SIGN LOCATIONS
frolmloBEGIN PROJECT 188673.08 SPECIAL LATERAL'V'DITCH EXIs SIGN
EE DETAIL 1 T E REM (ED N +40 + \ nl
O PIPE OUTLET CP 5 L4S5'Bl P
CHANNEL 'c' •- 4' T.2 TO
STABILIZATION h ^ ^ ¢ SYGF -L- POT Sta.21+70.00
CLASS B RIP RAP 1• ^r
L+25 SEE DETAIL 6 m m mN mN L+60 SPECI T'V DI END PROJECT 188673.08
65' L+30 CLA R RAP I 50, EE DE Ig
40' 65' EST.2 T F. 15„40' 40 i \ o� L+36 z
Q 40' L+ 0 D L 5 EST.7 SYG 40 RCP-III \ r\ \'e� 55, 55'
50' 'D
E �l EX.RW EX.RW J
E DBE \ E
BOOOi
- � - •K \ F SHEPARD SCHOOL RD.
RETAIN O MOVE - RE MO Y•EI7 'L
SIP SM SIEM/Nm PAW F NILC IP/11' O W �� 1st W ®OE a<NYBER
IB'RCP IB'REP O M O RETAIN 42 --- G— --- -- ------------
-----•..— 24"RCIIIII C-G 02
____ E 0 ,per C J,I III
11Ir Il �JI�- IJIII A19 p 7 4 ` G• .. s i
i s ? C L 5 _ _ L 4151'L.0 B000B 1 SPECIAL LATERAL'V DITCH ••„ ••
�/— 40' SEE DETAIL 4 d -- EX.R—MOM r .
L -- --- wPIBLIC EASEMENT i+�
M 50, ��/ ST.52 TONS RAP N
RCP-III 0 6',� EST.7 SYGF \ PECIAL LATERAL VARIABLE WIDT ASE DITCH
EXIST SIDEWALK 0 _ S 10 TONS CLASS B RIP RAP
DETAILL+15 TO BE REMOVED
40' REMOVE 51 LF RET 4 4 PDT Std.16+65'85 = —L— Sta.19+05.00
24'RCP Y- PC Sta.20+14JO END GRADE/
4 Y+53.5
� BEGIN OVERLAY/WIDENING`
ISSK EXIST SIDEWALK q J 6
0 Y- PT Sto.18-M2J8 SPECIAL BACK OF CURB DITCH
IDBS fi7
BOYS A GB TO BE REMOVED SEE DETAIL 3
Clue OF ZEBIILON 3
pn cum or ENVY OBNff `� / DETAIL 6 DETAIL 8
DO 01lt p pp{= pO PIPE OUTLET CHANNEL RIP RAP AT KMENT
FN 2TOOBEEE RETAIN d IN—.scale) N°rro scale)
NcwraL to'm;".
-F Dikh
ADJ.C fF4 +""sz G de
/O• c NEL ED
GEOTEXTILE
Length= 10 F. rvar;°hiB
/ qq d= 1.25 Ft. Type of Dner= Clasz Rip-Rap
MM OR FORMERLY i QA Est.= 5 Tons of Class B Rip-Rap FROM -Y-STA.22+68 TO STA.22+83 LT
FaEM 7=13"BN••OI ON!O IOEEIY -L-STA.14+57 LT FROM -Y-STA.23+15 TO STA.23+29 RT
\ 0o ONEO K 00[i! NNS7FAD.WIN A11F11•M. RETAIN
FNDaaaIw4 M7PC a� /J DETAIL 7 TT TT
a•�r0000" 4 INSET A
FM DOEOBQ4f SPECIAL LATERAL W(N.1t. E WIDTH BASE DIT
� 1•\ � � (Nor ro Scale)
Q k\ A IMUM DEPTH
• O ;II NCRETE CA
E SPECIAL BACK OF CURB CUT DITCH roes 'o et slope SIN Iw Mq
\4Y m O SEE DETAILS D P I LI
W p �7 T
0 O Georexrle B Min.D= F. Q __sp•E /J
JD TAIN• NM Olt FO•ElY ••I'•� �s I
eT F ry n •GME FIIOFFItIl3• Max.d- 1 Ft. S'� 4�.
MR TA
v S EXIST SIDEWALK WYMOBEIT llt Type of Liner- Class B Rip-Rap B= V es(k) RET
N1q I TO BE REMOVED 0!OIMFO OOfN NAGS PROPOSED
w Y ADJOINING _ E FROM STA.21+00 TO STA.21 -L-RT �J'��11BBK��I&CC
y'cDT FN:mFb,El LEGEND ° B AD/ `� J
rNF ALLOWABLE IMPACTS ZONE 1 !O'2B'24'
1•NS /
c SPECIAL LATERAL'V'DITCH /
2 �� SEE DETAIL 1 /
�� .S}o/S ALLOWABLE IMPACTS ZONE 2
.00
�N Ty 49 MITIGABLE IMPACTS ZONE 1 IBEGINT4C T /
rS IS - - O 4 2.17
MITIGABLE IMPACTS ZONE 2
uin�

/ ) 1 \ mm \ \`- l \ PROJECT REFERENCE NO. SHEET NO.
s/ SPECIAL LAT R W} TDITCH SP€CdAi IA L'nq i ./" / (l J �/} I CURVE DATA-(-Y-) � ��r! I �\ \\) I /`� � �\\\ \\ \\ m�eaT �\`^ 1\- ell 18SS73DO 4
aD '1 .L '_i I -� (Nor xam�q / 1 - ( / i j / z\ \ `.d RW SHEET NO.
-- \ \ \ J P fSla 16+9393 P157a 22+8/.90 x t �j \ - _ s' / N 66'2�' \9' z ;NNIVIIIIIIIII,
M dom ROADWAY DESIGN HYDRAULICS
z Ak A 33=- /_ `\ `\ J b/-1 43 52--Y 0 - 5'Jr26Z(RT) a J \ / \ \ \ wl�AROFm -
3 �f siop l ro° 3�( \` Fill w f Jd V ( D I'03,39T / I T�O�`,un�I 1 - ''g f ,// \ \ ^33z6 \\ ENGINEER ENGINEER
/ D \' >� C6 / c'''--7L = 530A5
/ -'I Y / _ w�a / T P
/ T = Z6524' F0 / ?S
S // / Min.D) Ft. -A J Mh D=i�ff.- 1 / _ �/ \ \ R \•�
3 / / R = 5.400J�(Y `I /
/ Y ( PECIAL bMEK.AL'CI!DITCH \ \ r
FROM -L STA.1 +66 TO 3TK 15+50 LT�� `_ PH OS = OOMPH / s, /
FROM -L-STq..18+25 TO 521+00 Ri3 -1 / Yi f J EE DETAIL 1
FROM YY STA. +75 r STA.17+2 R7 o A d2} z, __ ', / �' l / END C ST• C `;✓\"\ \�z�
q FROM -L-BT Cl +40 TO STA. 5450 RT , / ( w // �.� / - -Y- T Stagy -- .� \~� _ - \
FROM /Y-STA. 1+50 TO STA.22 LT 6 p B= NC / /� \ G)
\ FROM -Lf STA.1 {75 T{J\S7?..4-4+5i W�3z ^ \ \ \ \
FROM Y-STA. 4+7s TCS STA.2 50 LT o. -�,/ / 1 < .r„ /% / - - ti4 ` �.
FROM 11'-STA?21+75 1'Q STA.2 25 RT 'L",
t'�319/ / ,,( / l^\ \m _� /// \ / o + r �. -- -\ •.�`,;� \w,z N 1
SPECIAL CoT DITCHI w / ! \n -917 �� me 3y 4� 'l ^\/ / z �'1.~ \'\ \ z
5:IN
f ! 1 ,yeD 8��0 \3 z\p
D" " \f r L _ 1 z DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
DA' / /�,/^�jJ� �✓ \ _�C1flPE,tcl91`7 '- /• i f Q y° \\ �\�� r j\ 1�ti - _ \ UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
ooa I - J \-3ti L S i J` -" ,. // ^; \ \\ \ 1\ PLANS PREPARED BY:
p \ r ay tc? ]\ e ay / 4^/ i s`J �_�- 1it� - sfa1L noN// /. / I/ \. \ \ \ \
c m�1e (-R'S.> ..._]s -- / y 9 1 r r / \ LA S I R PhRIp '/ / \
\EE DET L Sy/ / / / ! // \ SPECIAL ygTERAL'T9tTQH \ 434 USA
j �`F f ) l/ ♦ \ / f I A+�`3\b a `' ♦ \ ] 1\/r '� ( / \ l ( \ SEE DEL-i T4 434 FAYETTEVILLE STREET
> ) / 1 •,, , !� BUFFER DRAW IN ''\ �� � � RUPEE 1588
\ Y +6: ` RALEIG1 NC 27601
FRFif�1 -L>STA\18+Z5 TO STA.2Q+19 LT 5"' Liz, \ 1 \\ \ a r-.- i£\^ _ - / ///? \ \1 f/ // \ 55' "^ \ \ TEL:1.91�,836.4040
`^) D \ ! / �' \ �� ' (w� 1 / \- 40' FAX:1.9E NO.4099
F-01
\ w ��, 31�A, ,` /\ 55' SFiEETh3� OF\ `\
SPECI BACICOF"CURB G_UT CiLTCH ,� } / L l� ^\- \_�j�J ,r 40, (1 \ 1 LICENSE NO.F-0165
^J INbf4O ISc.}di9\ \ 13` /,w \ \ ! '/• \ //�/ / w / O -a9 \��5, ''Q \ ♦ t,Jza_L
\ \ RIP RAP AT EMBANKMENT - !` MOR OR FlIfIl T
EST.g TONS CLASS I RIP / / i�// / / PIPE OUTLET Tw UC \ \ \\ a
,�clEouNd'���/ I \5wt J u♦ L\ \I �C ��yL rk r ~lrF�\ 16 SYGF / / .4 /( z S ABCHAILIZATNEL ION OM m40 ro OON \ \ DgTbll �1 1 •\ \ ,3
,.'~\ SEE DETAIL 8 J/// CLASS IRIP RAP MEFOIWM! \ p +++AF]+I+�+�� s•
3. % \ - 32,` u/ S 6 // \ 8 1-y \�\1 j\ SPECIAL LATERAL'V'DITCH C9/ / 6Z SEE DETAIL 5 \ \ -\ \ �\ a\ PIP6INLET TLET CFiANNEL2 \ t �4
\ yy
\ 3m \ \ .r` y )y � l \ SEE DETAIL 1 / / � � \ \ (Noi'�Scalell } \ \
?6PECIAL 4'fHt�t'W DITCH ///Vnmm / � \ \\ -\\ -, t
FROM -L-ST.16+97 TO S7lrj16y 5\)tl'`\ �- S V 3�� � / \�1 SEE DETA14�1 \�� _ --_-_ '^� / ♦ � \ \\ \ � t \ \'"o 1 AN`'°`° O� \
dRQlr1 -Y- .17+25 TO\STA.1Qv+758TzzrA\� w/
\ >C ) 1 / `Y' ��
40' \ '�. \ 1 \ e
\� 1 \( /N TO BEy ELODAD� -1 \ / Y+2 , 3r \\ �'\ \t Length ll`�F}.l clv�nl.E� l 1 j\ a LL
^ Y +0 RYP�RAP A7 �~` C D I \ \ \
( L �f�` /r / ° 65 EMBANKMEN{. \ \ d=
, / \ '� \ \Est.= 4 to 8•Tons of Class 1 RI�Rap\ \
a>w )r \er Mw aM Fare v•/ .. 43 \ ' 65T.a SONS \
)iIM CLA IPRAP -'�09, CLASS I RIB jAP \\ \\ �3 \ \ V
g M ( \ J _L(5 AM1mIlIMFJB i B EST.2 t �. 7 SYGF \ \ 1, l \ \ 1Y_57•A.2 29 \
SPECIAL UITER/�'V'DITCC`�`/� tea^ \}1 a pe ( RIPRAP•• ••/ Q� Y +7 E, 2 \ \ \ 2 J
DET Jq ST.7 S f S DETAIL 8 \ \„
/ \ \ I l�/ / FMF /EST, NS �(, \ �' "\\ aZ ♦ \ R�FEIZ TO\SIGNti G P)AN
t ,5'r , ( �Mm m Fajf�r �/ E5r.7 s / IW a O\e a \ `a, HEET\SIGN4 FOR\ EED� \ \
91 -1.440 SYa. +/75.Od / ! \ \aoam tM10 yi 1 / S �, Ic/ o - \ \ w \ ♦ `WARNINb,SIGN\LOCATLOR%\
tp. \ 1 JSPEC L LATERAL'V'DIT � 0' O \ \ '� \��m! '�"-� \ \ \ \ \ \ \
IN PRP) CT IEL86 3. w a 1 EXIS SIGN j/->`<`w \ \ w \ \\ \ \ \ \ \
Z - / ^SEE) ETAIL 1 T E REM VED `A J / +40 \ JF + \
O 4� �r\N /} 1 r PIPE Ol1TLET ' \
ur iC4m w'w'} / 1 C NNEL / \ 1 T. TO \ \ \
rX� 1� 1 j H s- a \ '� \ -L- PGT Stu.2t` 70`0.0
ST BILIZATION r h' �^ y`4 ,ram\ \ L+60 SPECI NT V DI H�a \ \ \6p� ND P QJE 188 3.08\ \\ \\+2 CLASS
ESDETARIP RAP ` mb mH ,V (- q/ \ \ \, \ \ \
\\ ( ( L'1 k0 `'�30 / m RAP `CJ,/ / �5 40 ` EE L+36� \+41
0 EST SYG (`/ ® RCP-III 40 �` \ �� �0 \a
1 40' L+ 0 L 5D5 / I rn ao E dr \ \ - EX.W E%.RW \ \�.. \ ♦_ \ ��\J _
tee
_ — — — --- — —=9= _ ARC-SCHOOL RD_ —
= m d F \
\ \ RETAIN \ \ aF MOVE - ' \
i REMO 'M11F .L -�--�- / --T
/
RETAIN -
/J�, A 24„ _
CP-III G _ �- - _--- = P - I�- e= 43 15"R -III
F
)" r
A \ 1 J
24---\ l sCY / a19 A 2 I 4 \ L+50 1 \ \ L s o
�I� IJIII �-
S. i .w i \ \ A� 5 J 41.1' \ 1'0' S I \ 3\
/ / 1 / a.1/ i /\ 7• „ - \ -G• 40' ` SEEC ETALAT�R/�L'V DI11CH \ -- _1 i £� EX.R
N ��--------` /- CLA55'B'SRIPRAP I G: ,off �- �y �hLl_r. �\ \ 1, \ ~r
1 1 I W � / ' V•'f16LIC Nr£FASEFEMT- \ \ \ 1 it? � �� � \ \ I �� 3 \.
x/,,++AA ESr.2 TONS \ \ \ \ N 1 ___ / ♦ 4 y a♦ ) \
24^ \ \ \ �7 JL
ES'f�7 SYGF\ } \ \ eoc \; \ ♦ \ -�,
RCP-111 0 \ \ \ PECIAL LATERAL�VCARIABCE,V tDT IQSE DITCH -4 «L• ♦ �- z
/EfISTSl9dWALK \� \\ \ > RAPTO BE REMOVED 0/ / / / REMOVE 51 LF q 4 L- POT J/O.I6+65B5 =t S $Y �9+ .UU f
_----_ 24"RCP RET / Y-P(. 20+1 \ f A 1 1 $ \� } 1 u \ V✓ \ \ \\ 3j0♦
4 e F Y+53.5 1 �I \ GIN bVERLYWIDLNG I1/ �\ gal �] / \, s J
( 2 1 \ 3 �y I ) �m
I 1 ISaI \ \ \ \ \ i�EXf T SIDEWALK A J. y- PT •+�•184-06 Piz( SPECIAL Bl1CK OF CURB DITCH
I AND \ \ - SEEI DETAIL 3 \ o /
\ j I CWB 27 !�BOYS �ft; \ \ -.°z£\�- `.i \��iTQ BI REMOVED Q\ - \ �S 1 \I ! l \ ,\ �,P ` G� l�! // \� \ ll^�,�✓
1 r `
r2 \\\ 1 4 �' e / `\ b ET t I / \ 1 ) /+ !ui j DETAIL g �J
m altMs Pe acme y J l 305 -
e / \ \ •MDIi OW m tNPr l'OIFIIT 5 \ I ^ N ( \ , L \ w RIP RAP AT EMBA KMENT \ \
RETAIN k, J T, `t t(PIPE ONJEtTo SH I�NEL , (f (\ ( \ \.'� ( 1 �aC\ l /o \ \C \ `
\ 1 `"La,' 1 No..o Scalel C \
\ \f m jl )wwo TO-..
\ ! / \ \ fa1Rw1� •4 1 .dm F..��otl(A�1 \ "\ `Y \ ^1 Hof °\ w 13, (�
!--- 1 \°'"� , ,�,,, \ \ : w \,,,. \<) L ♦ !�£ 19, t.om� /
1 } ADJ.C D \ C \ \ 1 d \ \ ^� \( ✓ 1 e 1 L \v;ti w�IGmde 15" 7/ )v
1 l Q• 4 ^I \1 L \ )) c NNEI sEl l \,y ,, \J \p •w ` \�. ^\ \ �w OTEXTIL / / -/ ///
^Y c f ( C Length 10 Ft. I,lel L l Jam./ �J ."1.)p`. \ 1..� l^Y) \' w -•! / aP //
­ _ \ w I d= 1. Ft. \ \ V -w �\ '6 ^9 l �neg(Ifer= IwrmP / / o
_ ' w L F 2 L w s( � Jy \F- 4\ ( -�ti T^ - 3�) 22+68 TO $A.22+83 L
r PoOMFLt FOMtVIIL 1/,J ♦ �A. /' N = 5'dons ofClass B Rip-Rapt \9r S L `1 J ♦ \ ,'.yZ�+�TO 5TA.23+29/RT
7ROT,m1m .i+ MOM m v^
m mt•o N Bill MN 0.YMt M1Y/, RETAIN, / / w \ r -L-STA.14+57 LT \ g`: l .\='\;
` fN 1 �4 a ��*\
FM lTO00{I ,� m J wp w ^ .�
ww mdowremN�? w/ / a / MM // a � �, TI L 1 AIL `` �m S\ :V r INSET "Arr
1 y w FOt 7tTON09m 4, V /)a L� / ( I SPECIAL LATERAL WARIAfiLE WIbltH BASE LY _ \ \
eA\\ K\J1q
/ ! )\ - a ►y 4 w\ IMUMr PFH
_-/�- \<\ w • A / c"Stj ^,r t1' ♦ ^'rr.,, NCRETE A
- \ / / SPECIAL BACK OF CURB CUT DITCH rove J. II w SIN -
~) SEE DETAIL 3 "M \ ! D Q 'S.° � 9,� C TJI�
lr�>�� �\\ �� a \a` L\ \") �J': �. � � �S- �•[ry 7A
3 i c' Qc zr- 'IN / wrm /�� �� z 1 \ ^7' v 1 F 7 I
zd \ \ Min.D= Ft. E\ o I
q t F ti / ..
(e < 4)'��++ff,�R TAI y ry O mIMI[ •Sr \ \ B= V e Ft \ j Y \/\ < ti ti
VJT) I E PROP v rs E�IST SIDEWALK�FJFOIrR LLC \ Type of L'er= Class\,.@ Rip-Rap / Y I w �Jm 1 l \ J I I\3 ET
Y ADJOINING PROJEC /706EREMOVED� mm \'w FROM STA.21+00 TO STA.21 -L-RTI F, pp E Pfj �i 42m venom /'
rep �•t/3✓ / S✓ T a // 1/ �� \ } \Qw \/r .° \ `8r \LEDli `✓ I \ r ir- - 1 DJ 4,/
SFF / y�� ALLOWABLE IMPACTS ZONE 1 sr f it c If 6
/
y
w �,J 1� SPECIAL LATERAS�'DITCH
:2 y SFT q
Z ' 2 /� SEE DETAIL 1 k� '! S,y\ \ ♦„
N� O s ALLOWABLE IMPACTS ZONE 2
W
t T / PSIS 1 ` \ -
cril� �'N S' \ /3zo• MITIGABLE IMPACTS ZONE 1 BEGIN
\' 1
) MITIGABLE IMPACTS ZONE 2

RIPARIAN BUFFER IMPACTS SUMMARY
IMPACTS BUFFER
TYPE ALLOWABLE MITIGABLE REPLACEMENT
Site Station Structure ROAD PARALLEL
No. (From/To) Size /Type CROSSING IMPACT BRIDGE ZONE 1 ZONE 2 TOTAL ZONE 1 ZONE 2 TOTAL ZONE 1 ZONE 2
(ft2) (ft2) (ft2) (ft2) (ft2) (ft2) (ft2) (ft2)
B1 -Y-Sta. 23+30 LT 48" Crosspipe & 'V' Ditch x 494 291 785 1594 700 2294
B2 -Y-Sta. 23+30 RT 48" Crosspipe & 'V' Ditch x 1962 1229 3191
B3 -L-Sta. 14+42 LT 30" Pipe Collar and Extend x 2045 1293 3339
B4 -L- Sta. 21+50 RT Lateral Variable Base Ditch x 613 982 1594
B5 -L-Sta. 21+50 LT Special Cut 'V' Ditch x 572 516 1088
TOTALS*: 5686 1 4311 9996 1594 700 2294 0 0
NOTES:
NC DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
11/17/2021
Wake County
188673-08.01
Revised 2018 Feb SHEET 4 OF 4

t STATE
s
ROY COOPERGovernor o
+
DIONNE DELLFGATTI
SecretaryT
S.DANIEL SMITH NORTH CAROLINA
Director Environmental Quality
May 12,2021
To: Amanda Johnson,WSP,USA
From: Rob Ridings,NC Division of Water Resources,Transportation Permitting Branch
Subject: Town of Zebulon Project:Intersection of SR 2320&Shepard School Road,Zebulon,
Neuse Basin,Wake County. DWR Project#20210937
Determination for Applicability to the Neuse Buffer Rules(15A NCAC 2B.0233)
Dear Ms Johnson:
The NC Division of Water Resources reviewed your Buffer Determination Package for the above project. The
drainage features are approximated on referenced package on topo and soils maps received by DWR on May 11,
2021.
NCDWR has confirmed that the drainage features approximated as follows:
Stream SA: SUBJECT to Neuse Buffer Rules
Stream SB: SUBJECT to Neuse Buffer Rules
Ditch DA: NOT subject to Neuse Buffer Rules
No other stream or buffer sites were included in this request. Also,this letter only addresses applicability to the
Neuse Buffer Rules at the sites specifically referenced and does not apply to reaches of the channels further
downstream,or upstream,from the project area,or to any other drainage features in the vicinity.
This letter only addresses the applicability to the Neuse buffer rules and does not approve any activity within the
buffer,Waters of the United States,or Waters of the State. Any impacts to wetlands, streams and buffers must
comply with the Neuse Buffer Rules,404/401 regulations,water supply regulations(15A NCAC 2B .0216),and any
other required federal, state and local regulations.
Please be aware that even if no direct impacts are proposed to the protected buffers, sheet flow of all new
stormwater runoff as per 15A NCAC 2B.0233 is required.
The owner(or future owners)or permittee should notify NCDWR(and other relevant agencies)of this
determination in any future correspondences concerning this property and/or project. This on-site determination
shall expire five(5)years from the date of this letter.
Landowners or affected parties that dispute a determination made by NCDWR or Delegated Local Authority that a
surface water exists and that it is subject to the mitigation rules may request a determination by the Director. A
request for a determination by the Director shall be referred to the Director in writing c/o Amy Chapman,NCDWR
Transportation Permitting Branch, 1617 Mail Service Center,Raleigh,NC 27699-1617.
Individuals that dispute a determination by NCDWR or Delegated Local Authority that"exempts"a surface water
from the mitigation rules may ask for an adjudicatory hearing. You may obtain the petition form from the office of
Administrative hearings. You must file the petition with the office of Administrative Hearings within sixty(60)
days of receipt of this notice and the date the affected party(including downstream and adjacent landowners)is
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality I Division of Water Resources
512 North Salisbury Street 11617 Mail Service Center I Raleigh,North Carolina 27699-1617
NORTH CAgpL3NA �
".wm^�dWE-L m�io��� /"� 919.707.9000

notified of this decision. A petition is considered filed when it is received in the office of Administrative Hearings
during normal office hours. The Office of Administrative Hearings accepts filings Monday through Friday between
the hours of 8:00am and 5:00pm,except for official state holidays. The original and one(1)copy of the petition
must be filed with the Office of Administrative Hearings.
The petition may be faxed-provided the original and one copy of the document is received by the Office of
Administrative Hearings within five(5)business days following the faxed transmission.
The mailing address for the Office of Administrative Hearings is:
Office of Administrative Hearings
6714 Mail Service Center
Raleigh,NC 27699-6714
Telephone: [phone],Facsimile: [phone]
A copy of the petition must also be served on DEQ as follows:
Mr. Sam M.Hayes,General Counsel
Department of Environmental Quality
1601 Mail Service Center
This determination is final and binding unless you ask for a hearing within 60 days.
If you have any additional questions or require additional information please contact Rob Ridings at
rob.ridings(a)ncdenr.gov.
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality I Division of Water Resources
512 North Salisbury Street 11617 Mail Service Center I Raleigh,North Carolina 2 76 9 9-161 7
NORTH CAgpLiY3A
Nmw .Mor iA„m iou.nq 919.707.9000

H' �t
Highway Stormwater Program
STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN
(Version 2.08;Released April 2018) lw:: FOR NCDOT PROJECTS IN
WBS Element: 188673.08 TIP No.: N/A County(ies): Wake Page 1 of 2
General Project Information
WBS Element: 188673.08 ITIP Number: N/A Project Type: Intersection Improvement Date: 6/21/2021
Town Contact: Chris Ray Contractor/Desi ner: WSP USA/John F.Watson,PE
Address:450 East Horton St Address:434 Fayetteville St.
Zebulon,NC 27597 Suite 1500
Raleigh,NC 27601
Phone: [phone] Phone: [phone]
Email: cra townofzebulon.or Email: 'ohn.f.watson ws .com
City/Town: Zebulon Count ies: Wake
River Basin(s): Neuse CAMA County? No
Wetlands within Project Limits? Yes
Project Description
Project Length(lin.miles or feet): 0.17 miles Surrounding Land Use: lResidential
Proposed Project Existing Site
Project Built-Upon Area ac. 2.4 ac. 1.2 ac.
Typical Cross Section Description: -L-will have 2-12'paved lanes with a 4'paved open shoulder/ditch section on the left;a 12'ctr.It. -L-features 2-14'paved lanes with C&G along the right side w/a 4'concrete sidewalk from Sta.
turn lane a 12'rt.turn lane along with a 5'concrete sidewalk and C&G.-Y-will feature 2-12'paved 12+75 to 16+66.From 16+66 to 21+70 L has 2-11'paved lanes w/open shoulder/ditch
lanes w/a 12'ctr It.turn lane with C&G on both sides w/a 5'concrete sidewalk.North of the sections.-Y-features 2-10'lanes w/4'concrete sidewalk on both sides and open
intersection,-Y-transitions from the C&G section to an open shoulder/ditch section shoulder/ditch sections from start to 20+14;and 2-12'paved lanes from Sta.20+14 to end.
Annual Avg Daily Traffic(veh/hr/day): Design/Future: 9800 2040 Existing: 6825 Year: 2022
General Project Narrative: Along Shepard School Rd(-L-)the roadway has been widened to include a variable turn and median lane and curb and gutter will be installed on both sides.Catch basins will
(Description of Minimization of Water be installed along the curb and gutter and tie into the existing 30"RCP-III near Sta.14+40.This crosspipe will be collared and extended to proposed roadway fill.By not
Quality Impacts) replacing 30"RCP-III,impacts to Wetland(W1)are minimized to mechanized clearing for roadway construction.Impacts to JS are from pipe extension and channel stabilization
at this site.Along Old Bunn Rd(-Y-),a proposed 48"RCP-III crosspipe will replace the existing 30"RCP.Permanent surface water mpacts to the JS,include rip rap at
embankment where a lateral'v'ditch outlets and channel stablization at the inlet of the proposed 48"RCP-III.At the outlet of the proposed 48"RCP-III,there is rip rap at the
embankment at the outlet of the ditch along with pipe outlet channel stabilization.The last site of impacts is at the end of the project on-L-RT where a proposed ditch outlets at
the wetland boundary and due to construction a segment of the wetland(W2)will require mechanized clearing.
Waterbody Information
Surface Water Body(1): Unnamed Tributary of Beaver Dam Creek NCDWR Stream Index No.: 27-86-2-3
NCDWR Surface Water Classification for Water Body Primary Classification: Class C
Supplemental Classification: Nutrient Sensitive Waters(NSW)
Other Stream Classification:
Impairments: None
Aquatic T&E Species? No Comments:
NRTR Stream ID: SA,SB(1-4) Buffer Rules in Effect: Neuse
Project Includes Bridge Spanning Water Body? INo I Deck Drains Discharge Over Buffer? I N/A Dissipator Pads Provided in Buffer? N/A
Deck Drains Discharge Over Water Body? I N/A (If yes,provide justification in the General Project Narrative) (If yes,describe in the General Project Narrative;if no,justify in the
(If yes,provide justification in the General Project Narrative) I General Project Narrative)

Hi�h., North Carolina Department of Transportation
Strmwater
Highway Stormwater Program
STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN
(Version 2.08;Released April 2018) FOR NCDOT PROJECTS
WBS Element: 188673.08 TIP No.: N/A Count ies: Wake Page 2 of 2
Swales
Station&Coordinates Surface Base Front Back Drainage Recommended Actual Longitudinal Rock BMP
Sheet (Road and Non Road Water Width Slope Slope Area Treatm't Length Length Slope Q2 V2 Q10 V10 Checks Associated w/
No. Projects) Body ft H:1 (H:1) (ac) (ft ft % cfs (fps) cfs (fps) Used Buffer Rules?
4 -Y-17+25 RT (1)Unnamed 0.0 4.0 2.0 1.3 128 250 1.22% 2.7 2.0 2.3 2.1 No No
-Y-19+75 RT Tributary of
4 -L-19+00 LT (1)Unnamed 0.0 4.0 3.0 0.1 8 119 1.55% 0.5 4.1 1.2 1.9 No No
-L-20+19 LT Tributary of
4 -L-19+00 RT (1)Unnamed 0.0 4.0 3.0 2.8 280 250 2.73% 4.4 7.1 9.6 3.9 Yes No
-L-20+50 RT Tributary of
4 -Y-21+50 LT (1)Unnamed 0.0 4.0 2.0 0.1 14 125 0.38% 0.4 1.0 1.2 1.1 No No
-Y-22+75 LT Tributary of
4 -L-16+97 RT (1)Unnamed 0.0 4.0 3.0 2.9 292 203 2.88% 4.4 4.7 5.6 3.4 Yes No
-L-19+00 RT Tributary of
4 -L-13+50 LT (1)Unnamed 0.0 4.0 3.0 0.5 48 106 1.25% 1.2 2.7 1.5 0.4 Yes No
-L-14+56 LT Tributary of
4 -L-15+75 LT (1)Unnamed 0.0 4.0 2.0 0.1 13 109 0.30% 0.3 1.3 0.9 1.0 Yes No
-L-14+66 LT Tributary of
Additional Comments

Appendix D: Supplementary Information
1. USACE Wetland Determination Forms
2. NC DWQ Stream Identification Forms
3. US Fish and Wildlife Service Information and
Planning Consultation Official Species List
4. NC Natural Heritage Program Report
S. NC State Historic Preservation Office Response
Letter

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers OMB Control#:0710-xxxx,Exp:Pending
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET—Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT:
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R (Authority:AR 335-15,paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: Intersection Improvements at SR 2320 and Shepard School Road City/County: Zebulon/Wake Sampling Date: 4/7/21
Applicant/Owner: Town of Zebulon State: NC Sampling Point: WA
Investigator(s): A.Johnson&C. Baker,WSP USA Section,Township, Range: Little River Township
Landform(hillside,terrace,etc.): floodplain Local relief(concave,convex,none): concave Slope(%): 0-2
Subregion(LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.839743 Long:-78.315130 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: HeB-Helena sandy loam,2 to 6 percent slopes NWI classification: R4SBC
Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no,explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are"Normal Circumstances"present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed,explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS—Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No within a Wetland? Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators(minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators(minimum of one is required:check all that apply) —Surface Soil Cracks(136)
X Surface Water(Al) _True Aquatic Plants(1314) _Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(138)
X High Water Table(A2) X Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(Cl) —Drainage Patterns(1310)
X Saturation(A3) _Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots(C3) _Moss Trim Lines(616)
—Water Marks(131) —Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) _Dry-Season Water Table(C2)
_Sediment Deposits(132) _Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils(C6) X Crayfish Burrows(C8)
_Drift Deposits(63) _Thin Muck Surface(C7) _Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery(C9)
—Algal Mat or Crust(134) —Other(Explain in Remarks) —Stunted or Stressed Plants(D1)
X Iron Deposits(135) _Geomorphic Position(D2)
_Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(137) —Shallow Aquitard(D3)
—Water-Stained Leaves(69) _Microtopographic Relief(D4)
Aquatic Fauna(1313) X FAC-Neutral Test(D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes X No Depth(inches): 0.25
Water Table Present? Yes X No Depth(inches): 0
Saturation Present? Yes X No Depth(inches): 0 Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data(stream gauge,monitoring well,aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG,JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont—Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: WA
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 10'x30' ) %Cover Species? Status Dominance Test worksheet:
1 Number of Dominant Species
2. That Are OBL, FACW,or FAC: 1 (A)
3• Total Number of Dominant
4. Species Across All Strata: 1 (B)
5. Percent of Dominant Species
6. That Are OBL, FACW,or FAC: 100.0% (A/B)
7. Prevalence Index worksheet:
=Total Cover Total%Cover of: Multiply by:
50%of total cover: 20%of total cover: OBL species x 1 =
Saplino/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 10'x30' ) FACW species x 2=
1. FAC species x 3=
2. FACU species x 4=
3. UPL species x 5=
4. Column Totals: (A) (B)
5. Prevalence Index =B/A=
6. Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7. _1 -Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
8. X 2-Dominance Test is>50%
9. _3-Prevalence Index is:53.0'
=Total Cover 4-Morphological Adaptations'(Provide supporting
50%of total cover: 20%of total cover: data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 10'x30' ) -Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
1. Juncus effusus 70 Yes FACW 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
2. present,unless disturbed or problematic.
3. Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
4. Tree-Woody plants,excluding vines,3 in. (7.6 cm)or
5• more in diameter at breast height(DBH), regardless of
6 height.
7• Sapling/Shrub-Woody plants,excluding vines,less
8• than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
9 (1 m)tall.
10. Herb-All herbaceous(non-woody)plants, regardless
11. of size,and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
70 =Total Cover Woody Vine-All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
50%of total cover: 35 20%of total cover: 14 height.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 10'x30' )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Hydrophytic
=Total Cover Vegetation
50%of total cover: 20%of total cover: Present? Yes X No
Remarks:(Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Plot size adjsuted to fit the size of the wetland
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG,JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont-Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: WA
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color(moist) % Color(moist) % Types Loc2 Texture Remarks
0-18 10YR 4/2 100 Loamy/Clayey
Type: C=Concentration,D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining,M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
_Histosol (Al) _Polyvalue Below Surface(S8)(MLRA 147,148) _2 cm Muck(A10)(MLRA 147)
_Histic Epipedon(A2) _Thin Dark Surface(S9)(MLRA 147,148) —Coast Prairie Redox(A16)
—Black Histic(A3) —Loamy Mucky Mineral(F1)(MLRA 136) (MLRA 147,148)
X Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) _Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) —Piedmont Floodplain Soils(F19)
—Stratified Layers(A5) _Depleted Matrix(F3) (MLRA 136,147)
_2 cm Muck(A10)(LRR N) _Redox Dark Surface(F6) —Red Parent Material(F21)
_Depleted Below Dark Surface(A11) _Depleted Dark Surface(F7) (outside MLRA 127, 1479 148)
_Thick Dark Surface(Al 2) _Redox Depressions(F8) —Very Shallow Dark Surface(F22)
—Sandy Mucky Mineral(S1) _Iron-Manganese Masses(F12)(LRR N, —Other(Explain in Remarks)
_Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) MLRA 136)
—Sandy Redox(S5) _Umbric Surface(F13)(MLRA 122,136) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
—Stripped Matrix(S6) —Piedmont Floodplain Soils(F19)(MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present,
Dark Surface(S7) Red Parent Material(F21)(MLRA 127,147,148) unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer(if observed):
Type:
Depth(inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
Soil was extremely saturated and muddy
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG,JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont—Version 2.0

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers OMB Control#:0710-xxxx,Exp:Pending
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET—Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT:
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R (Authority:AR 335-15,paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: Intersection Improvements at SR 2320 and Shepard School Road City/County: Zebulon/Wake Sampling Date: 4/7/21
Applicant/Owner: Town of Zebulon State: NC Sampling Point: UPA
Investigator(s): A.Johnson&C. Baker,WSP USA Section,Township, Range: Little River Township
Landform(hillside,terrace,etc.): hillslope Local relief(concave,convex,none): convex Slope(%): 2-4
Subregion(LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.839761 Long:-78.315095 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: HeB-Helena sandy loam,2 to 6 percent slopes NWI classification: R4SBC
Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no,explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation X Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are"Normal Circumstances"present? Yes No X
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed,explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS—Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No X Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X within a Wetland? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
Upland data form represents the adjacent roadside area that is periodically mowed.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators(minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators(minimum of one is required:check all that apply) —Surface Soil Cracks(136)
_Surface Water(Al) _True Aquatic Plants(1314) _Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(138)
—High Water Table(A2) —Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(Cl) —Drainage Patterns(1310)
_Saturation(A3) _Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots(C3) _Moss Trim Lines(616)
—Water Marks(131) —Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) _Dry-Season Water Table(C2)
_Sediment Deposits(132) _Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils(C6) _Crayfish Burrows(C8)
_Drift Deposits(63) _Thin Muck Surface(C7) _Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery(C9)
—Algal Mat or Crust(134) —Other(Explain in Remarks) —Stunted or Stressed Plants(D1)
_Iron Deposits(135) —Geomorphic Position(D2)
_Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(137) —Shallow Aquitard(D3)
—Water-Stained Leaves(69) _Microtopographic Relief(D4)
Aquatic Fauna(1313) FAC-Neutral Test(D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No X Depth(inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No X Depth(inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No X Depth(inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data(stream gauge,monitoring well,aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG,JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont—Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: UPA
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 10'x30' ) %Cover Species? Status Dominance Test worksheet:
1 Number of Dominant Species
2. That Are OBL, FACW,or FAC: 0 (A)
3• Total Number of Dominant
4. Species Across All Strata: 2 (B)
5. Percent of Dominant Species
6. That Are OBL, FACW,or FAC: 0.0% (A/B)
7. Prevalence Index worksheet:
=Total Cover Total%Cover of: Multiply by:
50%of total cover: 20%of total cover: OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
Saplino/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 10'x30' ) FACW species 0 x 2= 0
1. FAC species 5 x 3= 15
2. FACU species 80 x 4= 320
3. UPL species 35 x 5= 175
4. Column Totals: 120 (A) 510 (B)
5. Prevalence Index =B/A= 4.25
6. Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7. _1 -Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
8. 2-Dominance Test is>50%
9. _3-Prevalence Index is:53.0'
=Total Cover 4-Morphological Adaptations'(Provide supporting
50%of total cover: 20%of total cover: data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 10'x30' ) -Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
1. Anthoxanthum odoratum 50 Yes FACU 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
2. Lamium purpureum 35 Yes UPL present,unless disturbed or problematic.
3. Poa annua 20 No FACU Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
4. Taraxacum officinale 10 No FACU Tree-Woody plants,excluding vines,3 in. (7.6 cm)or
5. Valerianella radiata 5 No FAC more in diameter at breast height(DBH), regardless of
6 height.
7• Sapling/Shrub-Woody plants,excluding vines,less
8• than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
9 (1 m)tall.
10. Herb-All herbaceous(non-woody)plants, regardless
11. of size,and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
120 =Total Cover Woody Vine-All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
50%of total cover: 60 20%of total cover: 24 height.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 10'x30' )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Hydrophytic
=Total Cover Vegetation
50%of total cover: 20%of total cover: Present? Yes No X
Remarks:(Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Plot size adjsuted to fit the roadside upland area
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG,JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont-Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: UPA
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color(moist) % Color(moist) % Types Loc2 Texture Remarks
0-4 10YR 3/4 100 Loamy/Clayey
4-10 10YR 4/4 60 10YR 3/4 40 Loamy/Clayey
10-16 10YR 5/4 100 Loamy/Clayey
Type: C=Concentration,D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining,M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
_Histosol (Al) _Polyvalue Below Surface(S8)(MLRA 147,148) _2 cm Muck(A10)(MLRA 147)
_Histic Epipedon(A2) _Thin Dark Surface(S9)(MLRA 147,148) —Coast Prairie Redox(A16)
—Black Histic(A3) —Loamy Mucky Mineral(F1)(MLRA 136) (MLRA 147,148)
_Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) _Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) —Piedmont Floodplain Soils(F19)
—Stratified Layers(A5) _Depleted Matrix(F3) (MLRA 136,147)
_2 cm Muck(A10)(LRR N) _Redox Dark Surface(F6) —Red Parent Material(F21)
_Depleted Below Dark Surface(A11) _Depleted Dark Surface(F7) (outside MLRA 127, 1479 148)
_Thick Dark Surface(Al 2) _Redox Depressions(F8) —Very Shallow Dark Surface(F22)
—Sandy Mucky Mineral(S1) _Iron-Manganese Masses(F12)(LRR N, —Other(Explain in Remarks)
_Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) MLRA 136)
—Sandy Redox(S5) _Umbric Surface(F13)(MLRA 122,136) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
—Stripped Matrix(S6) —Piedmont Floodplain Soils(F19)(MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present,
Dark Surface(S7) Red Parent Material(F21)(MLRA 127,147,148) unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer(if observed):
Type:
Depth(inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG,JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont—Version 2.0

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers OMB Control#:0710-xxxx,Exp:Pending
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET—Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT:
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R (Authority:AR 335-15,paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: Intersection Improvements at SR 2320 and Shepard School Road City/County: Zebulon/Wake Sampling Date: 4/7/21
Applicant/Owner: Town of Zebulon State: NC Sampling Point: WB
Investigator(s): A.Johnson&C. Baker,WSP USA Section,Township, Range: Little River Township
Landform(hillside,terrace,etc.): hillslope Local relief(concave,convex,none): none Slope(%): 2-5
Subregion(LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.839761 Long:-78.315095 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: RgC-Rawlings-Rion complex,6-10 percent slopes NWI classification: none
Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no,explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are"Normal Circumstances"present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed,explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS—Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No within a Wetland? Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators(minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators(minimum of one is required:check all that apply) —Surface Soil Cracks(136)
_Surface Water(Al) _True Aquatic Plants(1314) _Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(138)
X High Water Table(A2) —Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(Cl) —Drainage Patterns(1310)
X Saturation(A3) _Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots(C3) _Moss Trim Lines(616)
—Water Marks(131) —Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) _Dry-Season Water Table(C2)
_Sediment Deposits(132) _Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils(C6) X Crayfish Burrows(C8)
_Drift Deposits(63) _Thin Muck Surface(C7) _Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery(C9)
—Algal Mat or Crust(134) —Other(Explain in Remarks) —Stunted or Stressed Plants(D1)
_Iron Deposits(135) X Geomorphic Position(D2)
_Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(137) —Shallow Aquitard(D3)
—Water-Stained Leaves(69) _Microtopographic Relief(D4)
Aquatic Fauna(1313) FAC-Neutral Test(D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No X Depth(inches):
Water Table Present? Yes X No Depth(inches): 12
Saturation Present? Yes X No Depth(inches): 10 Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data(stream gauge,monitoring well,aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG,JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont—Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: WB
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30'radius ) %Cover Species? Status Dominance Test worksheet:
1. Liquidambar styraciflua 35 Yes FAC Number of Dominant Species
2. Pinus taeda 10 Yes FAC That Are OBL, FACW,or FAC: 4 (A)
3• Total Number of Dominant
4. Species Across All Strata: 5 (B)
5. Percent of Dominant Species
6. That Are OBL, FACW,or FAC: 80.0% (A/B)
7. Prevalence Index worksheet:
45 =Total Cover Total%Cover of: Multiply by:
50%of total cover: 23 20%of total cover: 9 OBL species x 1 =
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 30'radius ) FACW species x 2=
1. Liquidambar styraciflua 20 Yes FAC FAC species x 3=
2. Acerrubrum 5 No FAC FACU species x 4=
3. Morella cerifera 5 No FAC UPL species x 5=
4. Liriodendron tulipifera 2 No FACU Column Totals: (A) (B)
5. Pinus taeda 2 No FAC Prevalence Index =B/A=
6. Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7. _1 -Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
8. X 2-Dominance Test is>50%
9. _3-Prevalence Index is:53.0'
34 =Total Cover 4-Morphological Adaptations'(Provide supporting
50%of total cover: 17 20%of total cover: 7 data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 30'radius ) -Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
1. Lonicera japonica 20 Yes FACU 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
2. Juncus effusus 5 Yes FACW present,unless disturbed or problematic.
3. Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
4. Tree-Woody plants,excluding vines,3 in. (7.6 cm)or
5• more in diameter at breast height(DBH), regardless of
6 height.
7• Sapling/Shrub-Woody plants,excluding vines,less
8• than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
9 (1 m)tall.
10. Herb-All herbaceous(non-woody)plants, regardless
11. of size,and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
25 =Total Cover Woody Vine-All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
50%of total cover: 13 20%of total cover: 5 height.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30'radius )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Hydrophytic
=Total Cover Vegetation
50%of total cover: 20%of total cover: Present? Yes X No
Remarks:(Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG,JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont-Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: WB
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color(moist) % Color(moist) % Types Loc2 Texture Remarks
0-4 10YR 3/2 100 Loamy/Clayey
4-9 2.5Y 7/3 70 10YR 7/8 20 C M Loamy/Clayey Prominent redox concentrations
10YR 4/1 10
9-17 10YR 4/2 95 10YR 5/8 5 C M Loamy/Clayey Prominent redox concentrations
17-20 10YR 4/1 95 10YR 4/6 5 C M Loamy/Clayey Prominent redox concentrations
Type: C=Concentration,D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining,M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
_Histosol (Al) _Polyvalue Below Surface(S8)(MLRA 147,148) _2 cm Muck(A10)(MLRA 147)
_Histic Epipedon(A2) _Thin Dark Surface(S9)(MLRA 147,148) —Coast Prairie Redox(A16)
—Black Histic(A3) —Loamy Mucky Mineral(F1)(MLRA 136) (MLRA 147,148)
_Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) _Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) —Piedmont Floodplain Soils(F19)
—Stratified Layers(A5) X Depleted Matrix(F3) (MLRA 136,147)
_2 cm Muck(A10)(LRR N) _Redox Dark Surface(F6) —Red Parent Material(F21)
_Depleted Below Dark Surface(A11) _Depleted Dark Surface(F7) (outside MLRA 127, 1479 148)
_Thick Dark Surface(Al 2) _Redox Depressions(F8) —Very Shallow Dark Surface(F22)
—Sandy Mucky Mineral(S1) _Iron-Manganese Masses(F12)(LRR N, —Other(Explain in Remarks)
_Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) MLRA 136)
—Sandy Redox(S5) _Umbric Surface(F13)(MLRA 122,136) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
—Stripped Matrix(S6) —Piedmont Floodplain Soils(F19)(MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present,
Dark Surface(S7) Red Parent Material(F21)(MLRA 127,147,148) unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer(if observed):
Type:
Depth(inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
Gravel and sand was intermixed within the soil profile from 4 to 13 inches
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG,JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont—Version 2.0

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers OMB Control#:0710-xxxx,Exp:Pending
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET—Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT:
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R (Authority:AR 335-15,paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: Intersection Improvements at SR 2320 and Shepard School Road City/County: Zebulon/Wake Sampling Date: 4/7/21
Applicant/Owner: Town of Zebulon State: NC Sampling Point: UPB
Investigator(s): A.Johnson&C. Baker,WSP USA Section,Township, Range: Little River Township
Landform(hillside,terrace,etc.): hillslope Local relief(concave,convex,none): none Slope(%): 5-10
Subregion(LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.840441 Long:-78.314920 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: RgC-Rawlings-Rion complex,6-10 percent slopes NWI classification: none
Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no,explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are"Normal Circumstances"present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed,explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS—Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No X Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X within a Wetland? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators(minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators(minimum of one is required:check all that apply) —Surface Soil Cracks(136)
_Surface Water(Al) _True Aquatic Plants(1314) _Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(138)
—High Water Table(A2) —Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(Cl) —Drainage Patterns(1310)
_Saturation(A3) _Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots(C3) _Moss Trim Lines(616)
—Water Marks(131) —Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) _Dry-Season Water Table(C2)
_Sediment Deposits(132) _Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils(C6) _Crayfish Burrows(C8)
_Drift Deposits(63) _Thin Muck Surface(C7) _Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery(C9)
—Algal Mat or Crust(134) —Other(Explain in Remarks) —Stunted or Stressed Plants(D1)
_Iron Deposits(135) —Geomorphic Position(D2)
_Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(137) —Shallow Aquitard(D3)
—Water-Stained Leaves(69) _Microtopographic Relief(D4)
Aquatic Fauna(1313) FAC-Neutral Test(D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No X Depth(inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No X Depth(inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No X Depth(inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data(stream gauge,monitoring well,aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG,JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont—Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: UPB
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30'radius ) %Cover Species? Status Dominance Test worksheet:
1. Juniperus virginiana 10 Yes FACU Number of Dominant Species
2. That Are OBL, FACW,or FAC: 1 (A)
3. Total Number of Dominant
4. Species Across All Strata: 3 (B)
5. Percent of Dominant Species
6. That Are OBL, FACW,or FAC: 33.3% (A/B)
7. Prevalence Index worksheet:
10 =Total Cover Total%Cover of: Multiply by:
50%of total cover: 5 20%of total cover: 2 OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
Saplino/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 30'radius ) FACW species 0 x 2= 0
1. Liquidambar styraciflua 15 Yes FAC FAC species 15 x 3= 45
2. FACU species 110 x 4= 440
3. UPL species 0 x 5= 0
4. Column Totals: 125 (A) 485 (B)
5. Prevalence Index =B/A= 3.88
6. Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7. _1 -Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
8. 2-Dominance Test is>50%
9. _3-Prevalence Index is:53.0'
15 =Total Cover 4-Morphological Adaptations'(Provide supporting
50%of total cover: 8 20%of total cover: 3 data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 30'radius ) -Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
1. Rosa multiflora 90 Yes FACU 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
2. Lonicera japonica 10 No FACU present,unless disturbed or problematic.
3. Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
4. Tree-Woody plants,excluding vines,3 in. (7.6 cm)or
5, more in diameter at breast height(DBH), regardless of
6 height.
7• Sapling/Shrub-Woody plants,excluding vines,less
8. than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
9 (1 m)tall.
10. Herb-All herbaceous(non-woody)plants, regardless
11. of size,and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
100 =Total Cover Woody Vine-All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
50%of total cover: 50 20%of total cover: 20 height.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30'radius )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Hydrophytic
=Total Cover Vegetation
50%of total cover: 20%of total cover: Present? Yes No X
Remarks:(Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG,JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont-Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: UPB
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color(moist) % Color(moist) % Types Loc2 Texture Remarks
0-5 10YR 3/2 100 Loamy/Clayey
5-12 10YR 6/3 100 Loamy/Clayey
12-18 10YR 5/3 100 Loamy/Clayey
Type: C=Concentration,D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining,M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
_Histosol (Al) _Polyvalue Below Surface(S8)(MLRA 147,148) _2 cm Muck(A10)(MLRA 147)
_Histic Epipedon(A2) _Thin Dark Surface(S9)(MLRA 147,148) —Coast Prairie Redox(A16)
—Black Histic(A3) —Loamy Mucky Mineral(F1)(MLRA 136) (MLRA 147,148)
_Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) _Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) —Piedmont Floodplain Soils(F19)
—Stratified Layers(A5) _Depleted Matrix(F3) (MLRA 136,147)
_2 cm Muck(A10)(LRR N) _Redox Dark Surface(F6) —Red Parent Material(F21)
_Depleted Below Dark Surface(A11) _Depleted Dark Surface(F7) (outside MLRA 127, 1479 148)
_Thick Dark Surface(Al 2) _Redox Depressions(F8) —Very Shallow Dark Surface(F22)
—Sandy Mucky Mineral(S1) _Iron-Manganese Masses(F12)(LRR N, —Other(Explain in Remarks)
_Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) MLRA 136)
—Sandy Redox(S5) _Umbric Surface(F13)(MLRA 122,136) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
—Stripped Matrix(S6) —Piedmont Floodplain Soils(F19)(MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present,
Dark Surface(S7) Red Parent Material(F21)(MLRA 127,147,148) unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer(if observed):
Type:
Depth(inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG,JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont—Version 2.0

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers OMB Control#:0710-xxxx,Exp:Pending
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET—Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT:
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R (Authority:AR 335-15,paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: Intersection Improvements at SR 2320 and Shepard School Road City/County: Zebulon/Wake Sampling Date: 4/7/21
Applicant/Owner: Town of Zebulon State: NC Sampling Point: WC
Investigator(s): A.Johnson&C. Baker,WSP USA Section,Township, Range: Little River Township
Landform(hillside,terrace,etc.): depression Local relief(concave,convex,none): concave Slope(%): 0-2
Subregion(LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.837889 Long:-78.314483 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: HeB-Helena sandy loam,2 to 6 percent slopes NWI classification: PUBHh
Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no,explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation X Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are"Normal Circumstances"present? Yes No X
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed,explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS—Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No within a Wetland? Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
Vegetation was mowed within 7 days of the delineation which left behind dead material and made it difficult to characterize vegetation. Equipment
tracks in soft soil with standing water were observed within the wetland.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators(minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators(minimum of one is required:check all that apply) —Surface Soil Cracks(136)
_Surface Water(Al) _True Aquatic Plants(1314) _Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(138)
—High Water Table(A2) —Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(Cl) —Drainage Patterns(1310)
_Saturation(A3) X Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots(C3) _Moss Trim Lines(616)
—Water Marks(131) —Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) _Dry-Season Water Table(C2)
_Sediment Deposits(132) _Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils(C6) _Crayfish Burrows(C8)
_Drift Deposits(63) _Thin Muck Surface(C7) X Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery(C9)
—Algal Mat or Crust(134) —Other(Explain in Remarks) —Stunted or Stressed Plants(D1)
_Iron Deposits(135) X Geomorphic Position(D2)
_Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(137) —Shallow Aquitard(D3)
—Water-Stained Leaves(69) _Microtopographic Relief(D4)
Aquatic Fauna(1313) FAC-Neutral Test(D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No X Depth(inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No X Depth(inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No X Depth(inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data(stream gauge,monitoring well,aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
FAC-Neutral Test hydrology indicator was omitted due to inability to identify vegetation that typically grows within the area idenified as wetland WC
because of recent mowing.
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG,JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont—Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: WC
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30'radius ) %Cover Species? Status Dominance Test worksheet:
1 Number of Dominant Species
2. That Are OBL, FACW,or FAC: 1 (A)
3. Total Number of Dominant
4. Species Across All Strata: 1 (B)
5. Percent of Dominant Species
6. That Are OBL, FACW,or FAC: 100.0% (A/B)
7. Prevalence Index worksheet:
=Total Cover Total%Cover of: Multiply by:
50%of total cover: 20%of total cover: OBL species x 1 =
Saplino/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 30'radius ) FACW species x 2=
1. FAC species x 3=
2. FACU species x 4=
3. UPL species x 5=
4. Column Totals: (A) (B)
5. Prevalence Index =B/A=
6. Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7. _1 -Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
8. X 2-Dominance Test is>50%
9. _3-Prevalence Index is:53.0'
=Total Cover 4-Morphological Adaptations'(Provide supporting
50%of total cover: 20%of total cover: data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 30'radius ) -Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
1. Juncus effusus 10 Yes FACW 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
2. present,unless disturbed or problematic.
3. Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
4. Tree-Woody plants,excluding vines,3 in. (7.6 cm)or
5• more in diameter at breast height(DBH), regardless of
6 height.
7• Sapling/Shrub-Woody plants,excluding vines,less
8• than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
9 (1 m)tall.
10. Herb-All herbaceous(non-woody)plants, regardless
11. of size,and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
10 =Total Cover Woody Vine-All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
50%of total cover: 5 20%of total cover: 2 height.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30'radius )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Hydrophytic
=Total Cover Vegetation
50%of total cover: 20%of total cover: Present? Yes X No
Remarks:(Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Much of the area was covered in dead plant material.Some dead material that suggested plants such as Solidago sp.and Dichanthelium sp. (less
wet species)may be growing in the area identified as wetland WC
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG,JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont-Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: WC
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color(moist) % Color(moist) % Types Loc2 Texture Remarks
0-9 10YR 4/1 95 10YR 5/8 5 C PL/M Loamy/Clayey Prominent redox concentrations
9-15 10YR 5/1 80 10YR 5/8 20 C M Loamy/Clayey Prominent redox concentrations
15-24 10YR 6/1 75 10YR 5/6 25 C M Loamy/Clayey Prominent redox concentrations
Type: C=Concentration,D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining,M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
_Histosol (Al) _Polyvalue Below Surface(S8)(MLRA 147,148) _2 cm Muck(A10)(MLRA 147)
_Histic Epipedon(A2) _Thin Dark Surface(S9)(MLRA 147,148) —Coast Prairie Redox(A16)
—Black Histic(A3) —Loamy Mucky Mineral(F1)(MLRA 136) (MLRA 147,148)
_Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) _Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) —Piedmont Floodplain Soils(F19)
—Stratified Layers(A5) X Depleted Matrix(F3) (MLRA 136,147)
_2 cm Muck(A10)(LRR N) _Redox Dark Surface(F6) —Red Parent Material(F21)
_Depleted Below Dark Surface(A11) _Depleted Dark Surface(F7) (outside MLRA 127, 1479 148)
_Thick Dark Surface(Al 2) _Redox Depressions(F8) —Very Shallow Dark Surface(F22)
—Sandy Mucky Mineral(S1) _Iron-Manganese Masses(F12)(LRR N, —Other(Explain in Remarks)
_Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) MLRA 136)
—Sandy Redox(S5) _Umbric Surface(F13)(MLRA 122,136) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
—Stripped Matrix(S6) —Piedmont Floodplain Soils(F19)(MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present,
Dark Surface(S7) Red Parent Material(F21)(MLRA 127,147,148) unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer(if observed):
Type:
Depth(inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG,JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont—Version 2.0

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11 SA
Date: 4/7/21 Project/Site: Shepard School Rd Latitude: 35.837993
Intersection
Evaluator: A. Johnson and C. Baker, WSP USA County: Wake Longitude: -78.314776
Total Points: 27.5 Stream Determination (circle one) Other Zebulon Quadrangle
Stream is at least intermittent 7.5-Minute Series
if>_ 19 or perennial if 2:30* Ephemeral Intermittent Perennial e.g. Quad Name:
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal =9 ) Absent Weak Moderate Strong
1 a.Continuity of channel bed and bank 0 1 2 3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg 0 1 2 3
3. In-channel structure: ex. riffle-pool, step-pool, 0 1 2 3
ripple-pool sequence
4. Particle size of stream substrate 0 1 2 3
5.Active/relict floodplain 0 1 2 3
6. Depositional bars or benches 0 1 2 3
7. Recent alluvial deposits 0 1 2 3
8. Headcuts 0 1 2 3
9. Grade control 0 0.5 1 1.5
10. Natural valley 0 0.5 1 1.5
11. Second or greater order channel No=0 Yes=3
a artificial ditches are not rated;see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = 10 )
12. Presence of Baseflow 0 1 2 3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria 0 1 2 3
14. Leaf litter 1.5 1 0.5 0
15. Sediment on plants or debris 0 0.5 1 1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles 0 1 0.5 1 1.5
17. Soil-based evidence of high water table? No=0 Yes=3
C. Biology Subtotal = 8.5
18. Fibrous roots in streambed 3 2 1 0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed 3 2 1 0
20. Macrobenthos(note diversity and abundance) 0 1 2 3
21.Aquatic Mollusks 0 1 2 3
22. Fish 0 0.5 1 1.5
23. Crayfish 0 0.5 1 1.5
24.Amphibians 0 0.5 1 1.5
25.Algae 0 0.5 1 1.5
26.Wetland plants in streambed FACW=0.75; OBL= 1.5 Other=0
"perennial streams may also be identified using other methods.See p.35 of manual.
Notes:A crayfish, aquatic beetle, and many small clams were observed
Sketch:

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11 SB(1)
Date: 4/7/21 Project/Site: Shepard School Rd Latitude: 35.838636
Intersection
Evaluator: A. Johnson and C. Baker, WSP USA County: Wake Longitude: -78.315597
Total Points: 33.0 Stream Determination (circle one) Other Zebulon Quadrangle
Stream is at least intermittent 7.5-Minute Series
if>_ 19 or perennial if 2:30* Ephemeral Intermittent Perennial e.g. Quad Name:
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = 13 ) Absent Weak Moderate Strong
1 a.Continuity of channel bed and bank 0 1 2 3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg 0 1 2 3
3. In-channel structure: ex. riffle-pool, step-pool, 0 1 2 3
ripple-pool sequence
4. Particle size of stream substrate 0 1 2 3
5.Active/relict floodplain 0 1 2 3
6. Depositional bars or benches 0 1 2 3
7. Recent alluvial deposits 0 1 2 3
8. Headcuts 0 1 2 3
9. Grade control 0 0.5 1 1.5
10. Natural valley 0 0.5 1 1.5
11. Second or greater order channel No=0 Yes=3
a artificial ditches are not rated;see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = 10.5 )
12. Presence of Baseflow 0 1 2 3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria 0 1 2 3
14. Leaf litter 1.5 1 0.5 0
15. Sediment on plants or debris 0 0.5 1 1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles 0 0.5 1 1.5
17. Soil-based evidence of high water table? No=0 Yes=3
C. Biology Subtotal = 9.5
18. Fibrous roots in streambed 3 2 1 0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed 3 2 1 0
20. Macrobenthos(note diversity and abundance) 0 1 2 3
21.Aquatic Mollusks 0 1 2 3
22. Fish 0 0.5 1 1.5
23. Crayfish 0 0.5 1 1.5
24.Amphibians 0 0.5 1 1.5
25.Algae 0 0.5 1 1.5
26.Wetland plants in streambed FACW=0.75; OBL= 1.5 Other=0
"perennial streams may also be identified using other methods.See p.35 of manual.
Notes:A crayfish and several dragonfly nymphs and mosquito fish were observed
Sketch:

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11 SB(2)
Date: 4/7/21 Project/Site: Shepard School Rd Latitude: 35.839072
Intersection
Evaluator: A. Johnson and C. Baker, WSP USA County: Wake Longitude: -78.315696
Total Points: 28.0 Stream Determination (circle one) Other Zebulon Quadrangle
Stream is at least intermittent 7.5-Minute Series
if>_ 19 or perennial if 2:30* Ephemeral Intermittent Perennial e.g. Quad Name:
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = 11.5 ) Absent Weak Moderate Strong
1 a.Continuity of channel bed and bank 0 1 2 3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg 0 1 2 3
3. In-channel structure: ex. riffle-pool, step-pool, 0 1 2 3
ripple-pool sequence
4. Particle size of stream substrate 0 1 2 3
5.Active/relict floodplain 0 1 2 3
6. Depositional bars or benches 0 1 2 3
7. Recent alluvial deposits 0 1 2 3
8. Headcuts 0 1 2 3
9. Grade control 0 0.5 1 1.5
10. Natural valley 0 0.5 1 1.5
11. Second or greater order channel No=0 Yes=3
a artificial ditches are not rated;see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = 9•5 )
12. Presence of Baseflow 0 1 2 3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria 0 1 2 3
14. Leaf litter 1.5 1 0.5 0
15. Sediment on plants or debris 0 0.5 1 1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles 0 0.5 1 1.5
17. Soil-based evidence of high water table? No=0 Yes=3
C. Biology Subtotal = 7
18. Fibrous roots in streambed 3 2 1 0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed 3 2 1 0
20. Macrobenthos(note diversity and abundance) 0 1 2 3
21.Aquatic Mollusks 0 1 2 3
22. Fish 0 0.5 1 1.5
23. Crayfish 0 0.5 1 1.5
24.Amphibians 0 0.5 1 1.5
25.Algae 0 0.5 1 1.5
26.Wetland plants in streambed FACW=0.75; OBL= 1.5 Other=0
*perennial streams may also be identified using other methods.See p.35 of manual.
Notes: Data form also represents segment SB 3 ; a crayfish was observed
Sketch:

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11 SB(4)
Date: 4/7/21 Project/Site: Shepard School Rd Latitude: 35.840031
Intersection
Evaluator: A. Johnson and C. Baker, WSP USA County: Wake Longitude: -78.314831
Total Points: 31.5 Stream Determination (circle one) Other Zebulon Quadrangle
Stream is at least intermittent 7.5-Minute Series
if>_ 19 or perennial if 2:30* Ephemeral Intermittent Perennial e.g. Quad Name:
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = 10 ) Absent Weak Moderate Strong
1 a.Continuity of channel bed and bank 0 1 2 3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg 0 1 2 3
3. In-channel structure: ex. riffle-pool, step-pool, 0 1 2 3
ripple-pool sequence
4. Particle size of stream substrate 0 1 2 3
5.Active/relict floodplain 0 1 2 3
6. Depositional bars or benches 0 1 2 3
7. Recent alluvial deposits 0 1 2 3
8. Headcuts 0 1 2 3
9. Grade control 0 0.5 1 1.5
10. Natural valley 0 0.5 1 1.5
11. Second or greater order channel No=0 Yes=3
a artificial ditches are not rated;see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = 11 )
12. Presence of Baseflow 0 1 2 3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria 0 1 2 3
14. Leaf litter 1.5 1 0.5 0
15. Sediment on plants or debris 0 0.5 1 1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles 0 1 0.5 1 1.5
17. Soil-based evidence of high water table? No=0 Yes=3
C. Biology Subtotal = 10.5
18. Fibrous roots in streambed 3 2 1 0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed 3 2 1 0
20. Macrobenthos(note diversity and abundance) 0 1 2 3
21.Aquatic Mollusks 0 1 2 3
22. Fish 0 0.5 1 1.5
23. Crayfish 0 0.5 1 1.5
24.Amphibians 0 0.5 1 1.5
25.Algae 0 0.5 1 1.5
26.Wetland plants in streambed FACW=0.75; OBL= 1.5 Other=0
"perennial streams may also be identified using other methods.See p.35 of manual.
Notes:A few crayfish and several dragonfly nymphs, aquatic snails, tadpoles, and mosquito fish were observed
Sketch:

� s'• � � Rif�7rF
United States Department of the Interior
f FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
. Raleigh Ecological Services Field Office
Post Office Box 33726
Raleigh,NC 27636-3726
Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
In Reply Refer To: September 02, 2021
Consultation Code: 04EN2000-2021-SLI-2157
Event Code: 04EN2000-2021-E-04422
Project Name: Intersection Improvements at SR 2230 and Shepard School Road
Subject: List of threatened and endangered species that may occur in your proposed project
location or may be affected by your proposed project
To Whom It May Concern:
The species list generated pursuant to the information you provided identifies threatened,
endangered, proposed and candidate species, as well as proposed and final designated critical
habitat, that may occur within the boundary of your proposed project and/or may be affected by
your proposed project. The species list fulfills the requirements of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service (Service) under section 7(c) of the Endangered Species Act(Act) of 1973, as amended
(16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.).
New information based on updated surveys, changes in the abundance and distribution of
species, changed habitat conditions, or other factors could change this list. Please feel free to
contact us if you need more current information or assistance regarding the potential impacts to
federally proposed, listed, and candidate species and federally designated and proposed critical
habitat. Please note that under 50 CFR 402.12(e) of the regulations implementing section 7 of the
Act, the accuracy of this species list should be verified after 90 days. This verification can be
completed formally or informally as desired. The Service recommends that verification be
completed by visiting the ECOS-IPaC website at regular intervals during project planning and
implementation for updates to species lists and information.An updated list may be requested
through the ECOS-IPaC system by completing the same process used to receive the enclosed list.
Section 7 of the Act requires that all federal agencies (or their designated non-federal
representative), in consultation with the Service, insure that any action federally authorized,
funded, or carried out by such agencies is not likely to jeopardize the continued existence of any
federally-listed endangered or threatened species. A biological assessment or evaluation may be
prepared to fulfill that requirement and in determining whether additional consultation with the
Service is necessary. In addition to the federally-protected species list, information on the
species' life histories and habitats and information on completing a biological assessment or

09/02/2021 Event Code: 04EN2000-2021-E-04422 2
evaluation and can be found on our web page at http://www.fws.gov/raleigh. Please check the
web site often for updated information or changes
If your project contains suitable habitat for any of the federally-listed species known to be
present within the county where your project occurs, the proposed action has the potential to
adversely affect those species. As such, we recommend that surveys be conducted to determine
the species' presence or absence within the project area. The use of North Carolina Natural
Heritage program data should not be substituted for actual field surveys.
If you determine that the proposed action may affect (i.e., likely to adversely affect or not likely
to adversely affect) a federally-protected species, you should notify this office with your
determination, the results of your surveys, survey methodologies, and an analysis of the effects
of the action on listed species, including consideration of direct, indirect, and cumulative effects,
before conducting any activities that might affect the species. If you determine that the proposed
action will have no effect (i.e., no beneficial or adverse, direct or indirect effect) on federally
listed species, then you are not required to contact our office for concurrence (unless an
Environmental Impact Statement is prepared). However, you should maintain a complete record
of the assessment, including steps leading to your determination of effect, the qualified personnel
conducting the assessment, habitat conditions, site photographs, and any other related articles.
Please be aware that bald and golden eagles are protected under the Bald and Golden Eagle
Protection Act(16 U.S.C. 668 et seq.), and projects affecting these species may require
development of an eagle conservation plan (http://www.fws.gov/windenergy/
eagle_guidance.html). Additionally, wind energy projects should follow the wind energy
guidelines (http://www.fws.gov/windenergy/) for minimizing impacts to migratory birds and
bats.
Guidance for minimizing impacts to migratory birds for projects including communications
towers (e.g., cellular, digital television, radio, and emergency broadcast) can be found at: http://
www.fws.gov/migratorybirds/CurrentBirdlssues/Hazards/towers/towers.htm; http://
www.towerkill.com; and http://www.fws.gov/migratorybirds/CurrentBirdIssues/Hazards/
towers/comtow.html.
Not all Threatened and Endangered Species that occur in North Carolina are subject to section 7
consultation with the U.S Fish and Wildlife Service. Atlantic and shortnose sturgeon, sea
turtles,when in the water, and certain marine mammals are under purview of the National Marine
Fisheries Service. If your project occurs in marine, estuarine, or coastal river systems you should
also contact the National Marine Fisheries Service, http://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/
We appreciate your concern for threatened and endangered species. The Service encourages
Federal agencies to include conservation of threatened and endangered species into their project
planning to further the purposes of the Act. Please include the Consultation Tracking Number in
the header of this letter with any request for consultation or correspondence about your project
that you submit to our office. If you have any questions or comments, please contact John Ellis
of this office at [e-mail].

09/02/2021 Event Code: 04EN2000-2021-E-04422 3
Attachment(s):
• Official Species List

09/02/2021 Event Code: 04EN2000-2021-E-04422 1
Official Species List
This list is provided pursuant to Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act, and fulfills the
requirement for Federal agencies to "request of the Secretary of the Interior information whether
any species which is listed or proposed to be listed may be present in the area of a proposed
action".
This species list is provided by:
Raleigh Ecological Services Field Office
Post Office Box 33726
Raleigh, NC 27636-3726
[phone]

09/02/2021 Event Code: 04EN2000-2021-E-04422 2
Project Summary
Consultation Code: 04EN2000-2021-SLI-2157
Event Code: Some(04EN2000-2021-E-04422)
Project Name: Intersection Improvements at SR 2230 and Shepard School Road
Project Type: TRANSPORTATION
Project Description: The Town of Zebulon is seeking to improve vehicular and pedestrian
safety by adding turn lanes, sidewalks, pedestrian and traffic signals.
Drainage improvements to accommodate the sidewalks and additional
lanes are also being proposed. There are three culvert extensions with
riprap stabilization at the inlet/outlet and two small sections of bank
stabilization along a stream bank that is located adjacent to the proposed
roadway fill slope.
Project Location:
Approximate location of the project can be viewed in Google Maps: https:
www.google.com/maps/035.838930399999995,-78.31591730432245,14z
L
2
' r
1• 5
Counties: Wake County, North Carolina

09/02/2021 Event Code: 04EN2000-2021-E-04422 3
Endangered Species Act Species
There is a total of 7 threatened, endangered, or candidate species on this species list.
Species on this list should be considered in an effects analysis for your project and could include
species that exist in another geographic area. For example, certain fish may appear on the species
list because a project could affect downstream species.
IPaC does not display listed species or critical habitats under the sole jurisdiction of NOAA
Fisheries1, as USFWS does not have the authority to speak on behalf of NOAA and the
Department of Commerce.
See the "Critical habitats" section below for those critical habitats that lie wholly or partially
within your project area under this office's jurisdiction. Please contact the designated FWS office
if you have questions.
1. NOAA Fisheries, also known as the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), is an
office of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration within the Department of
Commerce.
Birds
NAME STATUS
Red-cockaded Woodpecker Picoides borealis Endangered
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile:httpss://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/7614
Amphibians
NAME STATUS
Neuse River Waterdog Necturus lewisi Threatened
There is final critical habitat for this species.The location of the critical habitat is not available.
Species profile:https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/6772
Fishes
NAME STATUS
Carolina Madtom Noturus furiosus Endangered
There is final critical habitat for this species.The location of the critical habitat is not available.
Species profile:https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/528

09/02/2021 Event Code: 04EN2000-2021-E-04422 4
Clams
NAME STATUS
Atlantic Pigtoe Fusconaia masoni Proposed
There is proposed critical habitat for this species.The location of the critical habitat is not Threatened
available.
Species profile:https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/5164
Dwarf Wedgemussel Alasmidonta heterodon Endangered
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile:https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/784
Insects
NAME STATUS
Monarch Butterfly Danaus plexippus Candidate
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile:https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9743
Flowering Plants
NAME STATUS
Michaux's Sumac Rhus michauxii Endangered
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile:https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/5217
Critical habitats
THERE ARE NO CRITICAL HABITATS WITHIN YOUR PROJECT AREA UNDER THIS OFFICE'S
JURISDICTION.

Roy Cooler,{sovernor
r ■■■
■■ x NC DEPARTMENT OF 0 Reid Wilson,Secretary
A 71
■■� ■■ NATURAL AND CULTURAL RESOURCES
■ ■■■ fvlisty Buchanan
Deputy Director,Natural Heritage Program
NCNHDE-16245
November 4, 2021
Adam Karagosian
WSP USA
1001 Morehead Square Drive
Charlotte, INC 28203
RE: Intersection Improvements at SR 2320 and Shepard School Road
Dear Adam Karagosian:
The North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) appreciates the opportunity to provide
information about natural heritage resources for the project referenced above.
Based on the project area mapped with your request, a query of the NCNHP database indicates that
there are no records for rare species, important natural communities, natural areas, and/or
conservation/managed areas within the proposed project boundary. Please note that although there
may be no documentation of natural heritage elements within the project boundary, it does not
imply or confirm their absence; the area may not have been surveyed. The results of this query
should not be substituted for field surveys where suitable habitat exists. In the event that rare
species are found within the project area, please contact the NCNHP so that we may update our
records.
The attached 'Potential Occurrences' table summarizes rare species and natural communities that
have been documented within a one-mile radius of the property boundary. The proximity of these
records suggests that these natural heritage elements may potentially be present in the project area
if suitable habitat exists. Tables of natural areas and conservation/managed areas within a one-mile
radius of the project area, if any, are also included in this report.
If a Federally-listed species is found within the project area or is indicated within a one-mile radius of
the project area, the NCNHP recommends contacting the US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) for
guidance. Contact information for USFWS offices in North Carolina is found here:
https://www.fws.gov/offices/Directory/ListOffices.cfm?statecode=37.
Please note that natural heritage element data are maintained for the purposes of conservation
planning, project review, and scientific research, and are not intended for use as the primary criteria
for regulatory decisions. Information provided by the NCNHP database may not be published
without prior written notification to the NCNHP, and the NCNHP must be credited as an information
source in these publications. Maps of NCNHP data may not be redistributed without permission.
The INC Natural Heritage Program may follow this letter with additional correspondence if a
Dedicated Nature Preserve, Registered Heritage Area, Land and Water Fund easement, or Federally-
listed species are documented near the project area.
If you have questions regarding the information provided in this letter or need additional assistance,
please contact Rodney A. Butler at rod nev.butler(o)ncdcr.gov or 919-707-8603.
Sincerely,
NC Natural Heritage Program
0EPAR7MENT OF NATURAL AND CULTURAL RESOURCES
121 W.JONES STREET RALEIGH_h1C 27fiQB - 1651 MAIL SEFRv10E CEN I'CR,RALEIGH.NC 276"
OFC q14.7Q7131;20 • FAX 91R.707.9i?1

Natural Heritage Element Occurrences, Natural Areas, and Managed Areas Within a One-mile Radius of the Project Area
Intersection Improvements at SR 2320 and Shepard School Road
November 4, 2021
NCNHDE-16245
Element Occurrences Documented Within a One-mile Radius of the Project Area
Taxonomic EO ID Scientific Name Common Name ast Element Accuracy Federal State Global State
Group 0 Observation Occurrence Status Status Rank Rank
Date Rank
Dragonfly or 32043 Coryphaeschna ingens Regal Darner 2004-Pre H? 5-Very --- Significantly G5 S2?
Damselfly Low Rare
No Natural Areas are Documented Within a One-mile Radius of the Project Area
Managed Areas Documented Within a One-mile Radius of the Project Area
Managed Area Name Owner Owner Type
Town of Zebulon Open Space - Whitley Park Town of Zebulon Local Government
Town of Zebulon Open Space - Gill Street Park Town of Zebulon Local Government
Town of Zebulon Open Space Town of Zebulon Local Government
Definitions and an explanation of status designations and codes can be found at httos://ncnhde.natureserve.orq/helr). Data query generated on November 4,2021;source: NCNHP,Q3 October 2021.
Please resubmit your information request if more than one year elapses before project initiation as new information is continually added to the NCNHP database.
Page 2 of 3

NCNHDE-16245: Intersection Improvements at SR 2326 and Shepard School Road
.. .. 4i 6elMmdam G
�Y
-
ac!
5
.5
Y � L
9
y A.
�3 q�eyt R.r
11
� •27 K!
f' 7
- - - - z4 tieWsr• � - Qh�n n
F
-. - pari Ware
^mmccr.Y❑r swMF�f,y� � +e.daT.
- raoa e.tuwe..
r.an � nwr:f
— A
7.
P F��^ _ ��~Y1^ hN•� Y Zejlllltlfl .` -
5•rfh. yr,
wL 1 =
s -
November 4,2021 1:22,860
❑ Project Boundary Q 0.175 0-35 0-7 ml
Buffered Project Boundary 0 0.3 0.6 1.2 km
Managed Area r�v1AREA Sources:Esn,HERE,Garmn,Interrrrap,increment P Carp,GEKO.USGS,
1 ) FAO,NPS,NRCM.GmBase,IGN,Kadaster NL Ordnance Survey,Eeri Japan.
METI.Esri Chim IHong Kang),(q OpenStr"Wp contributors,and the GIS
User Conmun iy
Page 3 of 3

Ruw
North Carolina Department of Natural and Cultural Resources
State Historic Preservation Office
Ramona M.Bartos,Administrator
Governor Roy Cooper Office of Archives and History
Secretary D.Reid Wilson Deputy Secretary,Darin J.Waters,Ph.D.
October 12, 2021
Amanda Johnson Amanda.Johnson(cwsp.com
WSP USA
434 Fayetteville Street, Suite 1500
Raleigh,NC 27601
Re: Intersection improvements at SR 2320 and Shepard School Road, Zebulon, Wake County,
ER 21-2226
Dear Ms. Johnson:
Thank you for your letter of September 7, 2021, regarding the above-referenced undertaking. We have
reviewed the submission and offer the following comments.
We have conducted a review of the project and are aware of no historic resources which would be affected
by the project. Therefore, we have no comment on the project as proposed.
The above comments are made pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act and the
Advisory Council on Historic Preservation's Regulations for Compliance with Section 106 codified at 36
CFR Part 800.
Thank you for your cooperation and consideration. If you have questions concerning the above comment,
contact Renee Gledhill-Earley, environmental review coordinator, at 919-814-6579
or environmental.review&ncdcr.gov. In all future communication concerning this project,please cite the
above referenced tracking number.
Sincerely,
Ramona Bartos, Deputy
State Historic Preservation Officer
Location:109 East Jones Street,Raleigh NC 27601 Mailing Address:4617 Mail Service Center,Raleigh NC 27699-4617 Telephone/Fax:[phone]-6898