NCG060143_Inspection_20211201

ROY COOPER
Governor
ELIZABETH S. BISER
Secretory
BRIAN WRENN
Director
December 6, 2021
Valley Proteins, Inc.
Attn: Paul White, General Manager
PO Box 1025
Rose Hill, INC 28458
Valley Proteins, Inc.
Attn: Gerald F. Smith, Jr., President
151 Valoro Drive
Winchester VA 22603
NORTH CAROLINA
Environmental Quality
Subject: Compliance Evaluation Inspection
NPDES General Stormwater Permit NCG060000
Certificate of Coverage NCG060143
Valley Proteins, Inc. Rose Hill Division
Duplin County
Dear Mr. White
On December 1, 2021, Brian Lambe from the Wilmington Regional Office of the Division of Energy, Mineral, and
Land Resources (DEMLR), conducted a compliance evaluation inspection for Valley Proteins, Inc Rose Hill
Division located on Yellow Cut Road, Duplin County, North Carolina.
The following observations were noted during the DEMLR inspection (please see the attached addendum for
additional information about your permit):
1) Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SPPP)
A Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SPPP) has been developed, recorded, and properly implemented.
Yes ■ No ❑
2) Qualitative Monitoring
Qualitative monitoring has been conducted and recorded in accordance with permit requirements.
Yes ■ No ❑
3) Analytical Monitoring
Analytical monitoring has not been conducted and recorded in accordance with permit requirements. The tier
response must be carried over from the previous permit period, it does not restart. You must reinstitute Tier III
status for outfalls 3 and 4 for COD and TSS. Additionally, you must sample for fecal coliform at these two
outfal Is.
Yes ❑ No ■
Other Observations:
Submit attached Representative Outfall Status application for outfall 2. Include in application to eliminate outfall
1.
Submit Tier III response to this office by January 1, 2022.
D_E QJ� North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality I Division of Energy, Mineral and Land Resources
Wilmington Regional Office 1127 Cardinal Drive Extension I Wilmington, North Carolina 28405
Homy cuaunn
aw�aenwwmnb�o..ary 910.796.7215

Valley Proteins Rose Hill
NCG060143
Page 2 of 2
Thank you for your assistance and cooperation during this inspection. If you have any questions, comments, or
need assistance with understanding any aspect of your permit, please do not hesitate to contact me at
[phone].
Z
e
Environmental Specialist
Land Quality Section
Attachments:
1. BIMS Inspection Checklist
cc:WiRO Files — Land Quality
tt North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality I Division of Energy, Mineral and Land Resources
_E �J/ Wilmington Regional office 1 127 Cardinal Drive Extension I Wilmington. North Carolina 28405
910.796.7215

Compliance Inspection Report
Permit: NCG060143 Effective: 07/01/21 Expiration: 06/30/26 Owner : Valley Proteins Inc
SOC: Effective: Expiration: Facility: Valley Proteins - Rose Hill Div.
County: Duplin 469 Yellowcut Rd
Region: Wilmington
Rose Hill NC 26458
Contact Person: Matt Haynes Title: District Env. Manager Phone: [phone]
Directions to Facility:
From Rose Hill, take Hwy 117 North approx. 0.8 miles to Yellowcut Rd., left to end of road
System Classifications: SWNC,
Primary ORC:
Secondary ORC(s):
On -Site Representative(s):
Related Permits:
Certification: Phone:
Inspection Date: 12101/2021 Entry Time 10:30AM Exit Time: 11:30AM
Primary Inspector: Brian P Lambe rr?? Phone:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Reason for Inspection: Routine Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Permit Inspection Type: Food/Tobacco/Soaps/Cosmetics/Public Warehousing Stormwater Discharge COC
Facility Status: ❑ Compliant E Not Compliant
Question Areas:
Storm Water
(See attachment summary)
Page 1 of 3

Permit: NCG060143 Owner - Facility:Valley Proteins Inc
Inspection Date: 12/01/2021 Inspection Type : Compliance Evaluation Reason for Visit: Routine
Inspection Summary:
Response to tier protocols should be submitted by January 1, 2022.
Page 2 of 3

Permit: NCG060143 Owner - Facility: Valley Proteins Inc
Inspection Date: 12/01/2021 Inspection Type : Compliance Evaluation
Reason for Visit: Routine
Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan
Yes No NA NE
Does the site have a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan?
0
❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a General Location (USGS) map?
0
❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a "Narrative Description of Practices"?
0
❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a detailed site map including outfall locations and drainage areas?
0
❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a list of significant spills occurring during the past 3 years?
0
❑ ❑ ❑
# Has the facility evaluated feasible alternatives to current practices?
0
❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the facility provide all necessary secondary containment?
0
❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a BMP summary?
E
❑ ❑ ❑
If Does the Plan include a Spill Prevention and Response Plan (SPRP)?
0
❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a Preventative Maintenance and Good Housekeeping Plan?
0
❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the facility provide and document Employee Training?
❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a list of Responsible Party(s)?
❑ ❑ ❑
# Is the Plan reviewed and updated annually?
❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a Stormwater Facility Inspection Program?
❑ ❑ ❑
Has the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan been implemented?
0
❑ ❑ ❑
Comment: Tier response needs to be more detailed on responses to sampling events
If the facility was in Tier III during permit renewal, the tier does NOT reset. If you had three
samples exceed the benchmark, that resets, but once Vou achieve the specified tier, it must be
complied with until conditions merit relief. Therefor, you must re-evaluate your tier status.
Submit documentation of the tier status and renewed response.
Qualitative Monitoring Yes No NA NE
Has the facility conducted its Qualitative Monitoring semi-annually? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑
Comment:
Analytical Monitoring Yes No NA NE
Has the facility conducted its Analytical monitoring? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑
# Has the facility conducted its Analytical monitoring from Vehicle Maintenance areas? N ❑ ❑ ❑
Comment: Fecal coliform needs to be tested on outfall 3, 4, and an offsite location for comparison. Offsite
comparison should be done for other parameters as well.
Permit and Outfalls Yes No NA NE
# Is a copy of the Permit and the Certificate of Coverage available at the site? E ❑ ❑ ❑
If Were all outfalls observed during the inspection? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑
# If the facility has representative outfall status, is it properly documented by the Division? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑
# Has the facility evaluated all illicit (non stormwater) discharges? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑
Comment: Sample point 1, NE side of the train tracks can be eliminated.
Sample Point 2, Representative Outfall Status by 3.
Page 3 of 3