NCG060290_Inspection_20211201

ROY COOPER
Governor
ELIZABETH S. BISER
Secretary
BRIAN WRENN
Director
December 3, 2021
Bunge Oils, Inc.
Attn: Mattias Richter, President
1391 Timberlake Manor Parkway
Chesterfield, MO 63017
NORTH CAROLINA
Environmental Quality
Subject: Compliance Evaluation Inspection
NPDES General Stormwater Permit NCG060000
Certificate of Coverage NCG060290
Warsaw Oil Processing Facility
Duplin County
Dear Mr. Richter:
On December 1, 2021, Brian Lambe from the Wilmington Regional Office of the Division of Energy, Mineral, and
Land Resources (DEMLR), conducted a compliance evaluation inspection Warsaw Oil Processing Facility located
in 376 W Park Drive, Duplin County, North Carolina. The site drains to Turkey Creek, which is currently classified
as Class C, Sw Waters in the Cape Fear River Basin.
The following observations were noted during the DEMLR inspection (please see the attached addendum for
additional information about your permit):
1) Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SPPP)
A Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SPPP) has been developed, recorded, and properly implemented.
Yes ■ No ❑
2) Qualitative Monitoring
Qualitative monitoring has been conducted and recorded in accordance with permit requirements.
Yes ■ No ❑
3) Analytical Monitoring
Analytical monitoring has been conducted and recorded in accordance with permit requirements.
Yes ■ No ❑
No recent sampling events have been recorded. Diligent effort needs to occur to obtain samples.
Other Observations:
Wastewater is being discharged to the stormwater pond 1. Install containment to prevent contamination of
stormwater. Provide this office of a timeline when the containment will be installed.
Thank you for your assistance and cooperation during this inspection. Please be advised that violations of the
NPDES Stormwater General Permit may be subject to a civil penalty assessment of up to $25,000.00 per day
for each violation. If you have any questions, comments, or need assistance with understanding any aspect of
your permit, please do not hesitate to contact Daniel Sams or me at 910-796-7215 or [e-mail]
Sincerely,,.,"
BrianLambe
'{
vlronmental Specialist
Land Quality Section
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality i Division of Energy. Mineral and Land Resources
Wilmington Regional Office 1127 Cardinal Drive Extension I Wilmington, North Carolina 28405
rvcani cu»uw.
"+u.e�.mar�.x�mwum 970.796.7215

BuDge Oils, Inc.
Page 2 of 2
Attachments:
1. BIMS Inspection Checklist
cc: WiRO Files — Land Quality
Central Files LF
Kelly Quinn, Bunge (email)
D_E Q North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality I Division of Energy, Mineral and Land Resources
�4J/p Wilmington Regional Office 1 L27 Cardinal Drive Extension I Wilmington, North Carolina 28405
rvonw cMourw
�a�v 910.796.7215

Permit: NGG060290
SOC:
County: Duplin
Region: Wilmington
Contact Person: Lisa Hart
Directions to Facility:
Compliance Inspection Report
Effective: 07/01/21 Expiration: 06/30/26 Owner: Bunge Oils Inc
Effective: Expiration: Facility: Warsaw Oil Processing Facility
376 W Park Or
System Classifications: SWNC,
Primary ORC:
Secondary ORC(s):
On -Site Representative(s):
Related Permits:
Inspection Date: 12/01/2021
Primary Inspector: Brian P Lambe
Secondary Inspector(s):
Title:
Entry Time 12:OOPM
Certification:
Warsaw NC 28398
Phone: [phone]
Phone:
Exit Time: 01:OOPM
Phone:
Reason for Inspection: Routine Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Permit Inspection Type: Food/Tobacco/Soaps/Cosmetics/Public Warehousing Stormwater Discharge CDC
Facility Status: ❑ Compliant M Not Compliant
Question Areas:
Storm Water
(See attachment summary)
Page 1 of 3

Permit: NCG060290 Owner- Facility: gunge Oils Inc
Inspection Date: 12/01/2021 Inspection Type : Compliance Evaluation Reason for Visit: Routine
Inspection Summary.
Met with Kelly Quinn, EHA Manager/QA Whole Harvest, Warsaw regarding NCG060290.
The SPPP was professionally prepared and updated according to the permit requirements.
Investigation of the site conditions revealed that there are issues with boiler blow down and product waste entering into pond
1. This discharge is wastewater and must be contained, Provide a schedule that is reasonable to establish containment.
The management of the flashboard riser in pond 1 needs to be documented. Currently, the flashboard is halfway up the riser.
The bottom of the riser showed evidence of some discharge. The pond condition appeared to be cloudy. A priority needs to
be placed on obtaining a sample for the discharge.
You may apply for Representative Outfall Status (ROS) for pond 2, represented by pond 1
Page 2 of 3

Permit: NCG060290 Owner- Facility: Bunge Oils Inc
Inspection Date: 12/01/2021 Inspection Type :Compliance Evaluation Reason for Visit: Routine
Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan
Yes No NA NE
Does the site have a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan?
M ❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a General Location (USGS) map?
0 ❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a "Narrative Description of Practices'?
E ❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a detailed site map including outfall locations and drainage areas?
0 ❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a list of significant spills occurring during the past 3 years?
❑ ❑ ❑
# Has the facility evaluated feasible alternatives to current practices?
❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the facility provide all necessary secondary containment?
❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a BMP summary?
❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a Spill Prevention and Response Plan (SPRP)?
0 ❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a Preventative Maintenance and Good Housekeeping Plan?
0 ❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the facility provide and document Employee Training?
M ❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a list of Responsible Party(s)?
0 ❑ ❑ ❑
# Is the Plan reviewed and updated annually?
0 ❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a Stormwater Facility Inspection Program?
❑ ❑ ❑
Has the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan been implemented?
❑ ❑ ❑
Comment
Qualitative Monitoring Yes No NA NE
Has the facility conducted its Qualitative Monitoring semi-annually? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑
Comment:
Analytical Monitoring Yes No NA NE
Has the facility conducted its Analytical monitoring? M ❑ ❑ ❑
# Has the facility conducted its Analytical monitoring from Vehicle Maintenance areas? ❑ ❑ ❑
Comment: Repeated no flow in pond 1 and 2. Pond two has a gate valve. Pond 1 has a flashboard riser.
There was evidence of flow at outlet of pond 1.
Permit and Outfalls
Yes No NA NE
# Is a copy of the Permit and the Certificate of Coverage available at the site?
❑
❑ ❑ ❑
# Were all outfalls observed during the inspection?
❑
❑ ❑ ❑
# If the facility has representative outfall status, is it properly documented by the Division?
❑
❑ ❑ ❑
# Has the facility evaluated all illicit (non stormwater) discharges?
❑
❑ ❑ ❑
Comment
Page 3 of 3