The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About20131291 Ver 1_Individual_20131213Corps Submittal Cover Sheet Please provide the following info: 1. Project Name Prosperity Ridge Road Enhancement Project 2. Name of Property Owner/Applicant: City of Charlotte 3. Name of Consultant/Agent: Mr. Isaac Hinson, PWS *Agent authorization needs to be attached. 4. Related/Previous Action ID number(s): 2012-00058 and DWQ-12-0007 5. Site Address: Ridge Road, Charlotte, NC 6. Subdivision Name: N/A 7. City: Charlotte 8. County: Mecklenburg 9. Lat: N35.3731410 Long: W80.7799260 (Decimal Degrees Please) 10. Quadrangle Name: Derita, NC, dated 1993 11. Waterway: UT to Stoney Creek 12. Watershed: UDDer Pee Dee (CU 03040105) 13. Requested Action: X Individual (Standard) Permit — IP/SP Nationwide Permit # General Permit # X Jurisdictional Determination Request (Origin//y Submitted on December 19, 2011) Pre -Application Request The following information will be completed by Corps office: AID Assign number in ORM Prepare File Folder Begin Date Authorization: Section 10 Section 404 Project Description/ Nature of Activity/ Project Purpose: Site/Waters Name: Keywords: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Wilmington District Individual Permit Application and Supplement Prosperity Ridge Road Enhancement Project Charlotte -Mecklenburg Storm Water Services Charlotte, North Carolina GAI Project 6110437.08 December 2013 Prepared For: Charlotte Storm Water Services 600 E. 41h Street, Floor 14 Charlotte, NC 28202 Prepared By: GAI Consultants 6100 Fairview Road, Suite 616 Charlotte, NC 28210 FfCharlofte-Meckieni STORM • gai consultants WATER transforming ideas into reality,) Services U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS APPLICATION FOR DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY PERMIT OMB APPROVAL NO. 0710-0003 EXPIRES: 28 FEBRUARY 2013 33 CFR 325. The proponent agency is CECW-CO-R. Public reporting for this collection of information is estimated to average 11 hours per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of the collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Department of Defense, Washington Headquarters, Executive Services and Communications Directorate, Information Management Division and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0710-0003). Respondents should be aware that notwithstanding any other provision of law, no person shall be subject to any penalty for failing to comply with a collection of information if it does not display a currently valid OMB control number. Please DO NOT RETURN your form to either of those addresses. Completed applications must be submitted to the District Engineer having jurisdiction over the location of the proposed activity. PRIVACY ACT STATEMENT Authorities: Rivers and Harbors Act, Section 10, 33 USC 403; Clean Water Act, Section 404, 33 USC 1344; Marine Protection, Research, and Sanctuaries Act, Section 103, 33 USC 1413; Regulatory Programs of the Corps of Engineers; Final Rule 33 CFR 320-332. Principal Purpose: Information provided on this form will be used in evaluating the application for a permit. Routine Uses: This information may be shared with the Department of Justice and other federal, state, and local government agencies, and the public and may be made available as part of a public notice as required by Federal law. Submission of requested information is voluntary, however, if information is not provided the permit application cannot be evaluated nor can a permit be issued. One set of original drawings or good reproducible copies which show the location and character of the proposed activity must be attached to this application (see sample drawings and/or instructions) and be submitted to the District Engineer having jurisdiction over the location of the proposed activity. An application that is not completed in full will be returned. (ITEMS 1 THRU 4 TO BE FILLED BY THE CORPS) 1. APPLICATION NO. 2. FIELD OFFICE CODE 3. DATE RECEIVED 4. DATE APPLICATION COMPLETE (ITEMS BELOW TO BE FILLED BY APPLICANT) 5. APPLICANT'S NAME 8. AUTHORIZED AGENT'S NAME AND TITLE (agent is not required) First - Isaac Middle - Last - Hinson First - Middle - Last - Company - City of Charlotte Company - E-mail Address-ihinson@charlottenc.gov E-mail Address - 6. APPLICANT'S ADDRESS: 9. AGENT'S ADDRESS: Address- 600 East 4th Street Address - City - Charlotte State - NC Zip -28202 Country -US City - State - Zip - Country - 7. APPLICANT'S PHONE NOs. w/AREA CODE 10. AGENTS PHONE NOs. w/AREA CODE a. Residence b. Business c. Fax a. Residence b. Business c. Fax 704-336-4495 704-353-0473 STATEMENT OF AUTHORIZATION 11. 1 hereby authorize, to act in my behalf as my agent in the processing of this application and to fumish, upon request, supplemental information in support of this permit application. SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT DATE NAME, LOCATION, AND DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT OR ACTIVITY 12. PROJECT NAME OR TITLE (see instructions) Prosperity Ridge Road Connection Project 13. NAME OF WATERBODY, IF KNOWN (if applicable) 14. PROJECT STREET ADDRESS (if applicable) UT to Stoney Creek Address 15. LOCATION OF PROJECT Latitude: -N 35.373141 Longitude: oW -80.77992 City - State- Zip - 16. OTHER LOCATION DESCRIPTIONS, IF KNOWN (see instructions) State Tax Parcel ID Varies Municipality Charlotte Section - Township - Range - ENG FORM 4345, OCT 2012 PREVIOUS EDITIONS ARE OBSOLETE. Page 1 of 3 17. DIRECTIONS TO THE SITE From uptown Charlotte head north on I-77 to Exit 19A for NC -115 and turn right onto NC -115 N/Old Statesville Road. Turn right onto Eastfield Road and follow for three miles then turn right onto Prosperity Church Road. Turn left onto Ridge Road, then left onto Prosperity View Drive, take the second left to stay on Prosperity View Drive. Follow Prosperity View Drive and turn left onto Prosperity Ridge Road and arrive at project location. See Section 1.1 of the attached Supplement 18. Nature of Activity (Description of project, include all features) The project will complete two gaps in Prosperity Ridge Road between Prosperity Church Road and Ridge Road and make improvements to the intersection of Ridge Road and Prosperity Ridge Road. Improvements to Prosperity Ridge Road will include travel lanes, bike lanes, curb and gutter, on street parking on one side of the road, planting strips and sidewalks. Improvements to Ridge Road include additional through lanes, left turn lanes, sidewalk, bike lanes, a major culvert structure, and installation of a traffic signal. See Section 2.1 of the attached Supplement 19. Project Purpose (Describe the reason or purpose of the project, see instructions) The purpose of this project is to extend Prosperity Ridge Road to Ridge Road and create a new intersection. This project is part of the Transportation Action Plan (TAP) that was adopted by the Charlotte City Council in 2006 that will provide a policy framework to improve mobility and reduce vehicle -miles -of -travel. The TAP will enhance street, parking, bicycle, and pedestrian areas. This project will construct a section of the roadway that will serve as an integral part of the roadway system for the future I-485 interchange. The Prosperity Village plan calls for a dense grid of two-lane thoroughfares and a split -diamond interchange with I-485 rather than a conventional multilane road with a simple diamond interchange. The split -diamond concept requires that there be three parallel north -south minor thoroughfares across 1-485 to distribute the traffic through the interchange. Prosperity Ridge Road is the easternmost of the three minor thoroughfares. Construction of this project will build part of thoroughfare that provides access to the 1-485 eastbound onramp and westbou See Section 2.2 of the attached Supplement USE BLOCKS 20-23 IF DREDGED AND/OR FILL MATERIAL IS TO BE DISCHARGED 20. Reason(s) for Discharge The proposed 0.2 mile project will complete two gaps in Prosperity Ridge Road between Prosperity Ridge Road and Ridge Road and make improvements to the intersection of Ridge Road and Prosperity Ridge Road. This connection is being proposed in accordance with the greater Prosperity Church Road Village Plan, which calls for the development of a mixed-use, pedestrian oriented, urban village. The proposed Project is a City administered project with Federal funds. Permitting is to be completed by the City of Charlotte. See Section 5.0 of the attached Supplement for Proposed Impacts Inventory. 21. Type(s) of Material Being Discharged and the Amount of Each Type in Cubic Yards: Type Type Type Amount in Cubic Yards Amount in Cubic Yards Amount in Cubic Yards 22. Surface Area in Acres of Wetlands or Other Waters Filled (see instructions) Acres 0.24 acre of wetlands or Linear Feet 369 linear feet of permanent impacts and 79 linear feet of temporary impacts to Stream 1 23. Description of Avoidance, Minimization, and Compensation (see instructions) See Section 6.0, of the attached Supplement, for a detailed description of all avoidance, minimization, and compensation activities. ENG FORM 4345, OCT 2012 Page 2 of 3 24. Is Any Portion of the Work Already Complete? Yes FX -]No IF YES, DESCRIBE THE COMPLETED WORK 25. Addresses of Adjoining Property Owners, Lessees, Etc., Whose Property Adjoins the Waterbody (if more than can be entered here, please attach a supplemental list). a. Address- 5518 PROSPERITY VIEW DR City - CHARLOTTE State - NC Zip - 28269 b. Address- 5533 PROSPERITY VIEW DR City - CHARLOTTE State - NC Zip - 28269 c. Address- 5049 PROSPERITY RIDGE RD City - CHARLOTTE State - NC Zip - 28269 d. Address- 5053 PROSPERITY RIDGE RD City - CHARLOTTE State - NC Zip - 28269 e. Address- 5041 PROSPERITY RIDGE RD City - CHARLOTTE State - NC Zip - 28269 26. List of Other Certificates or Approvals/Denials received from other Federal, State, or Local Agencies for Work Described in This Application. AGENCY TYPE APPROVAL' IDENTIFICATION DATE APPLIED DATE APPROVED DATE DENIED NUMBER NCDENR 401 Certification 12-0007 12/19/2011 1/23/2012 USACE 404 NWP 14 2012-00058 12/19/2011 1/17/2012 NCSHPO Section 106 NHPA ER 11-2318 12/02/2011 12/15/2011 Natural Heritage State Protected Specie 12/02/2011 12/07/2011 Would include but is not restricted to zoning, building, and flood plain permits 27. Application is hereby made for permit or permits to authorize the work described in this application. I certify that this information in this application is complete and accurate. I further certify that I possess the authority to undertake the work described herein or am acting as the duly authorized agent of the applicant. SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT DATE SIGNATURE OF AGENT DATE The Application must be signed by the person who desires to undertake the proposed activity (applicant) or it may be signed by a duly authorized agent if the statement in block 11 has been filled out and signed. 18 U.S.C. Section 1001 provides that: Whoever, in any manner within the jurisdiction of any department or agency of the United States knowingly and willfully falsifies, conceals, or covers up any trick, scheme, or disguises a material fact or makes any false, fictitious or fraudulent statements or representations or makes or uses any false writing or document knowing same to contain any false, fictitious or Fraudulent statements or entry, shall be fined not more than $10,000 or imprisoned not more than five years or both. ENG FORM 4345, OCT 2012 Page 3 of 3 OwnerLastN BARKLEY BIERFISCHER HAMMOND FENTRESS KELLY D WONG MOHANAN BOROWIK QUAST BOSTON OwnerFirst MailAddrl City State ZipCode SANDRA 5518 PROSPERITY VIEW DR CHARLOTTE NC 28269 CARL B 5533 PROSPERITY VIEW DR CHARLOTTE NC 28269 ROBERT K 5049 PROSPERITY RIDGE RD CHARLOTTE NC 28269 5569 PROSPERITY VIEW DR 5053 PROSPERITY RIDGE RD CHARLOTTE NC 28269 CHENG-1 INDIRA HENRY EUGENE EMIL THE THOMAS J MALLARD CREEK INC OPTIMIST CLUB NAZZARO LOIS B VAUGHN JIMMY A WILLIAMS RUTH A CAROLINA STYLE PROPERTIES LLC 5041 PROSPERITY RIDGE RD CHARLOTTE NC 28269 5519 PROSPERITY VIEW DR CHARLOTTE NC 28269 2241 FROST COURT HENDERSON NV 89052 4822 BOOMERANG WAY CHARLOTTE NC 28269 5455 PROSPERITY VIEW DR CHARLOTTE NC 28269- 5569 PROSPERITY VIEW DR CHARLOTTE NC 2333 5502 MCCHESNEY DR CHARLOTTE NC 28269 927 JEAN WY TIDIOUTE PA 16351 5573 PROSPERITY VIEW DR CHARLOTTE NC 28269 5581 PROSPERITY VIEW DR CHARLOTTE NC 28269 1369 TIMBERLANE TERRACE MOORESVILLE NC 28115 WORKMAN CHARLES L 5447 PROSPERITY VIEW DR CHARLOTTE NC 28269 TUAT GEORGETTE A 5458 PROSPERITY VIEW DR CHARLOTTE NC 28269 BERRYHILL PATRICIA C 5465 PROSPERITY VIEW DR CHARLOTTE NC 28269 FAIN CAROL F 5569 PROSPERITY VIEW DR CHARLOTTE NC 28269 SCOTT ROBERT 5506 PROSPERITY VIEW DR CHARLOTTE NC 28269 RAVNELL ADLINE P 11638 NORTHWOODS FOREST DR CHARLOTTE NC 28214 LYNCH ROBERT 5308 WAVERLY LN CHARLOTTE NC 28269 DAVIS DWIGHT 5937 WAVERLY LYNN LN CHARLOTTE NC 28269 BUTTAR DEBORAH 5329 JOHNSTON MILL CT CHARLOTTE NC 28269 BARKS ROBERT L 5559 PROPSPERITY VIEW DR CHARLOTTE NC 28269 FINLEY CELESTE 5459 PROSPERITY VIEW DR CHARLOTTE NC 28269 WOLZ STEPHEN 5429 PROSPERITY VIEW DR CHARLOTTE NC 28269 DAVIS EDDIE L 5505 PROSPERITY VIEW DR CHARLOTTE NC 28269 POOVEY CECILIA R 5537 PROSPERITY VIEW DR CHARLOTTE NC 28269 COWAN B JUDITH 5312 WAVERLY LYNN LN CHARLOTTE NC 28269 PROSPERITY ASSOCIATION 1518 EAST THIRD ST CHARLOTTE NC 28204 RIDGE INC COMMUNITY IDEAS MELISSA D 4626 KINGLAND CT CHARLOTTE NC 28269 OAKES CARNELL S JR 4620 KINGSLAND CT CHARLOTTE NC 28269 SOMMER HORST W 5466 PROSPERITY VEW RD CHARLOTTE NC 28269 HARRISON GEORGE L 5545 PROSPERITY VIEW DR CHARLOTTE NC 28269 MCKINLEY MARCELLUS 34 ASHLEY CT BLOOMFIELD CT 06002 LEON DIFRANCO CONCETTA 4715 BOOMERANG WAY CHARLOTTE NC 28269 CAROLINA STYLE 1369 TIMBERLANE TERRACE MOORESVILLE NC 28115 Page 1 of 2 OwnerLastN OwnerFirst MailAddrl City State ZipCode PROPERTIES LLC WEAVER BRIDGETTE 4624 KINGSLAND CT CHARLOTTE NC 28269 MICHELLE TRAYLOR ANGIE 5306 WAVERLY LYNN LN CHARLOTTE NC 2826941 OWNBEY JORENE R 5321 JOHNSTON MILL CT CHARLOTTE NC 28269 DAVIS MICHELE L 5331 JOHNSTON MILL CT CHARLOTTE NC 28269 BURCH WIL D 5310 WAVERLY LYNN LN CHARLOTTE NC 28269 RAY RONALD W 5515 PROSPERITY VIEW DR CHARLOTTE NC 28269 DRUM CHARLES M JR 1517 BEECH CIR WILKESBORO NC 28697 BOWSER BOBBY 5045 PROSPERITY RIDGE RD CHARLOTTE NC 28269 SHINHOLSER JACK W 5437 PROSPERITY VIEW DR CHARLOTTE NC 28269 REECE REECE E 4902 RIDGE RD CHARLOTTE NC 28269 MIHALOVICH MATTHEW F 5514 PROSPERITY VIEW DR CHARLOTTE NC 28269 CHARTER 1520 SOUTH BLVD SUITE 215 CHARLOTTE NC 28203 PROPERTIES INC CAROLINA STYLE 1369 TIMBERLANE TERRACE MOORESVILLE NC 28115 PROPERTIES LLC MANNO KRISTA L 420 CAMELOT DR SALISBURY NC 28144 EVANS MARIAN V 4719 BOOMERANG WAY CHARLOTTE NC 28269 TILLMAN ALICE 5551 PROSPERITY VIEW DR CHARLOTTE NC 28269 MOYE ANNIE REE 5541 PROSPERITY VIEW DR CHARLOTTE NC 28269 PROSPERITY ASSOCIATION 1518 EAST THIRD ST CHARLOTTE NC 28204 RIDGE INC COMMUNITY PROSPERITY ASSOCIATION 1518 EAST THIRD ST CHARLOTTE NC 28204 RIDGE INC COMMUNITY DANIEL TRUDY O 4706 RIDGE RD CHARLOTTE NC 28269 (TRUSTEE U/T/D) DAVIS ROBERT E 5469 PROSPERITY VIEW DR CHARLOTTE NC 28269 WILLIAMS HOLLIS R 9912 JEANETTE CIR CHARLOTTE NC 28213 CAROLINA STYLE 1369 TIMBERLANE TERRACE MOORESVILLE NC 28115 PROPERTIES LLC MOORE ELIZABETH S 5563 PROSPERITY VIEW DR CHARLOTTE NC 28269 LEAMING CHAD GILES 5305 WEVERLY LYNN LN CHARLOTTE NC 28269 MARTIN MARIE 5470 PROSPERITY VIEW DR CHARLOTTE NC 28269 COOPER JAMES LYLES II 5577 PROSPERITY VIEW DR CHARLOTTE NC 28269 UNTZ REECE EARL 4902 RIDGE RD CHARLOTTE NC 28269 LOVE PAULINE A 4826 BOOMERANG WAY CHARLOTTE NC 28269 ALLEN SHARON R 4610 KINGSLAND CT CHARLOTTE NC 28269 KNOWLTON TIMOTHY D 4711 BOOMERANG WY CHARLOTTE NC 28269 GARRARD TERRY 4622 KINGSLAND CT CHARLOTTE NC 28269 GROUSE CHRISTOPHER J 5335 JOHNSTON MILL CT CHARLOTTE NC 28269 HUBBARD CHARLES C 5523 PROSPERITY VIEW DR CHARLOTTE NC 28269 ROSEBOROUGH MORGAN G JR 5509 PROSPERITY VIEW DR CHARLOTTE NC 28269 STATEN LINDA 5510 PROSPERITY VIEW DR CHARLOTTE NC 28269 Page 2 of 2 Individual Permit Application and Supplement Prosperity Ridge Road Enhancement Project Permit Application Pursuant to an Individual Permit Tmhle of Contantc 1.0 PROJECT BACKGROUND............................................................................................. 1 1.1. Site Location and Directions................................................................................... 1 2.0 PROJECT INFORMATION AND HISTORY...................................................................... 2 2.1. Nature of Activity.................................................................................................. 2 2.2. Purpose and Need................................................................................................. 2 2.3. Permit History....................................................................................................... 2 2.4. Future Project Plans.............................................................................................. 3 3.0 SITE CHARACTERISTICS............................................................................................ 3 3.1. Vegetation Cover.................................................................................................. 3 3.2. Soils.................................................................................................................... 3 3.3. Wetlands..............................................................................................................3 3.4. Surface Waters..................................................................................................... 3 3.5. Open Water.......................................................................................................... 4 4.0 JUSRISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION........................................................................... 4 4.1. Methodology........................................................................................................ 4 4.2. Survey Summary.................................................................................................. 4 4.3. Jurisdictional Determination Verification Request ..................................................... 5 5.0 PROPOSED IMPACTS INVENTORY............................................................................... 5 5.1. Impacts Summary................................................................................................. 5 5.2. Wetland Impacts................................................................................................... 5 5.3. Stream Impacts.................................................................................................... 6 5.4. Pond or Lake Construction..................................................................................... 7 5.5. Buffer Impacts...................................................................................................... 7 6.0 IMPACT JUSTIFICATION AND MITIGATION.................................................................. 7 6.1. Avoidance and Minimization................................................................................... 7 6.1 Essential Fish Habitat............................................................................................ 9 6.2. Compensatory Mitigation....................................................................................... 9 7.0 STORMWATER MANAGEMENT....................................................................................10 8.0 SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION...............................................................................11 8.1. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat...............................................11 8.2. Essential Fish Habitat...........................................................................................11 8.3. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources...............................................................11 8.4. Flood Zone Designation........................................................................................11 9.0 REFERENCES............................................................................................................11 Tables Table 1: Summary of On -Site Soil Types.............................................................................. 3 Table 2: Summary of Proposed Impacts to Jurisdictional Waters of the U.S............................. 7 Table 3: Summary of Proposed Compensatory Mitigation.....................................................10 Appendices Appendix A ............................................ NCDOT Indirect and Cumulative Effects (ICE) Analysis AppendixB........................................................................................................ Figures 1 - 5 Appendix C....................................................................................... Agency Correspondence Appendix D ....................................... Wetland Data, Stream Assessment, & Approved JD Forms AppendixE..................................................................................................Site Photographs Appendix F. Plan and Profile Sheets SD -1 & 7 through 11, and Wetlands & Stream Impact Aerial Appendix G .......................................................... Erosion Control Plan Sheets ECP1 and ECP2 Appendix H............................................................. Schweinitz's Sunflower Assessment Report [This Page is Intentionally Blank] Charlotte Mecklenburg Storm Water Services Prosperity Ridge Road Enhancement Project USACE Individual (Standard) Permit Application Project #13110437.08 1.0 PROJECT BACKGROUND The City of Charlotte (the City) has retained GAI Consultants (GAI) to prepare a U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) Individual Permit (IP) Application for the proposed Prosperity Ridge Road Enhancement Project (Project). On behalf of the City, GAI is submitting an IP Application and Supplement in accordance with Engineer Form 4345, Application of a Department of the Army Permit, format, and pursuant to Section 404 of the Clean Water Act. The proposed 0.2 -mile project will complete two gaps in Prosperity Ridge Road between Prosperity Church Road and Ridge Road and make improvements to the intersection of Ridge Road and Prosperity Ridge Road. This connection is being proposed in accordance with the greater Prosperity Church Road Village Plan, which calls for the development of a mixed-use, pedestrian oriented, urban village. The proposed Project is a City administered project with Federal funds. Permitting is to be completed by CMSWS. Single and Complete Project The proposed Project terminates at Ridge Road and, based on previous meetings and correspondence with Liz Hair of USACE—Wilmington District Regulatory Permit Program, is considered single and complete (separate) from the I-485 Prosperity Church Road interchange. As such, the North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) I-485 Outer Loop Link of I- 77 to I-85 Project (R -2248E) permit will not require modification to include this specific project. Also, the NCDOT Indirect and Cumulative Effects (ICE) Analysis includes all the projects in the vicinity of the I-485 interchange rather than for each individual project. This document, Indirect Screening and Land Use Scenario Assessment Report, encompasses a large study area centered on the I-485 project from west NC 115 to I-85. This report addresses the proposed Prosperity Village Plan area both north and south of I-485 and references the area as 'Probable Development Area 2 — Prosperity Church Road Interchange Area." The I-485 interchange ICE Analysis is included in Appendix A for reference. Site Location and Directions The Project is located approximately 0.3 miles east of the Prosperity Church Road and Ridge Road intersection (on Ridge Road) in Charlotte, Mecklenburg County, NC. The proposed Project will connect two unfinished road gaps in Prosperity Ridge Road between Prosperity Church Road and Ridge Road in the northeast quadrant of the Prosperity Village Subdivision. This is illustrated on Figure 2, Project Location, in Appendix B. Applicant Name: Charlotte -Mecklenburg Storm Water Services Applicant Contact: Isaac J. Hinson, PWS Mailing Address: 600 East Fourth Street, Charlotte, NC 28202 Phone Number of Owner/Applicant: 704-336-4495 Street Address of Project: Ridge Road, Charlotte, NC Waterway: Unnamed Tributaries (UTs) to Stoney Creek Basin: Upper Pee Dee (CU 03040105) City: Charlotte County: Mecklenburg Decimal Degree Coordinate Location of Project Site: N35.3733020, W80.7798640 USGS Quadrangle Name: Derita, North Carolina, 1993 Page 1 of 11 Charlotte Mecklenburg Storm Water Services Prosperity Ridge Road Enhancement Project USACE Individual (Standard) Permit Application Project #13110437.08 From uptown Charlotte head north on I-77 to Exit 19A for NC -115 and turn right onto NC -115 N/Old Statesville Road. Turn right onto Eastfield Road and follow for three miles then turn right onto Prosperity Church Road. Turn left onto Ridge Road, then left onto Prosperity View Drive, take the second left to stay on Prosperity View Drive. Follow Prosperity View Drive and turn left onto Prosperity Ridge Road and arrive at project location. (See coordinate information above.) 2.0 PROJECT INFORMATION AND HISTORY 2.1. Nature of Activity The project will complete two gaps in Prosperity Ridge Road between Prosperity Church Road and Ridge Road and make improvements to the intersection of Ridge Road and Prosperity Ridge Road. Improvements to Prosperity Ridge Road will include travel lanes, bike lanes, curb and gutter, on street parking on one side of the road, planting strips and sidewalks. Improvements to Ridge Road include additional through lanes, left turn lanes, sidewalk, bike lanes, a major culvert structure, and installation of a traffic signal. Furthermore, the pipe system is being upgraded to meet the design level service for a thoroughfare (50 -year design standard). Future land use conditions analysis indicates that the road and adjacent structures will likely flood during more frequent storm events (10 -year and lower events), so the proposed pipe system has been designed to address future conditions as well. See Figure 2, Project Study Area, in Appendix B. Purpose and Need The purpose of this project is to extend Prosperity Ridge Road to Ridge Road and create a new intersection. This project is part of the Transportation Action Plan (TAP) that was adopted by the Charlotte City Council in 2006 that will provide a policy framework to improve mobility and reduce vehicle -miles -of -travel. The TAP will enhance street, parking, bicycle, and pedestrian areas. This project will construct a section of the roadway that will serve as an integral part of the roadway system for the future I-485 interchange. The Prosperity Village plan calls for a dense grid of two-lane thoroughfares and a split -diamond interchange with I-485 rather than a conventional multilane road with a simple diamond interchange. The split -diamond concept requires that there be three parallel north -south minor thoroughfares across I-485 to distribute the traffic through the interchange. Prosperity Ridge Road is the easternmost of the three minor thoroughfares. Construction of this project will build part of thoroughfare that provides access to the I-485 eastbound on-ramp and westbound off -ramp. Permit History Initially, a Nationwide Permit (NWP) 14 application was submitted to USACE and NCDENR on December 19, 2011 for the proposed Project. Following agency reviews, the Project was guided to complete an IP application. See USACE Action ID 2012-00058 and NCDENR DWQ# 12-0007 letters dated 1/17/2012 and 1/23/2012, respectively, for stated reasons in Appendix C Agency Correspondence. Since the original submittal, the project design has been modified to comply with City storm water engineering standards for 50- and 100 -year storm events. This modification has resulted in an increase in stream impacts. Page 2 of 11 Charlotte Mecklenburg Storm Water Services Prosperity Ridge Road Enhancement Project USACE Individual (Standard) Permit Application Project #B110437.08 Future Project Plans This Project is not a phased project. This TAP project is administered and permitted by the City of Charlotte, and is not tied to the NCDOT R -2248E permit. Additionally, there are presently no future plans for additional construction by the City. 3.0 SITE CHARACTERISTICS Vegetation Cover The land cover for the approximate 2.0 -acre Project study area is comprised of asphalt paved roadways, residential lots with maintained lawns, non -maintained open fields and woodland areas. Dominant vegetation within the project area consists of goldenrod (Soiidago), sweetgum (Liquidambar styracifiva), kudzu (Pueraria montana), common blackberry (Rubus argutus), sericea lespedeza (Lespedeza cuneata) and little bluestem (Schizachyrium scoparium). Soils The Soil Survey of Mecklenburg County (NRCS, 1980) identified four mapped soil types within the Project vicinity. See Figure 3, Soils Map in Appendix B. Table 1 lists the soil types present within the Project area. The Enon, Cecil and Mecklenburg series are well drained and exhibit high permeability. The Helena series is moderately well drained with moderate permeability. The Helena series is listed as partially hydric in Mecklenburg County. Wetlands Two wetlands were observed within the project study area. Wetlands were identified as WL1 and WL2. WL1 was classified as a Palustrine Emergent (PEM)/Palustrine Forested (PFO) wetland. WL2 was classified as a PEM wetland. WL1 and WL2 are further discussed in Section 5.2. One jurisdictional stream was observed within the project study area and identified as Stream 1. On -Site jurisdictional waters of the U.S. are UTs to Stoney Creek and are located within the Upper Pee Dee River basin (CU 03040105). Stoney Creek is classified as "Class C waters" by the North Carolina Division of Water Resources (NCDWR). Class C waters are freshwaters identified for aquatic life propagation/protection. A non -jurisdictional ditch was identified within the project study area at the time of field review and identified as Non -Jurisdictional Stream 2. Stream 1 and Stream 2 are discussed further is Section 5.3. Page 3 of 11 Table 1: On -Site Soil Types Map Unit Name Soil Series Name HeB Helena sandy loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes EnB Enon sandy loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes CeB2 Cecil sandy clay loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes, eroded MeB Mecklenburg fine sandy loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes The Enon, Cecil and Mecklenburg series are well drained and exhibit high permeability. The Helena series is moderately well drained with moderate permeability. The Helena series is listed as partially hydric in Mecklenburg County. Wetlands Two wetlands were observed within the project study area. Wetlands were identified as WL1 and WL2. WL1 was classified as a Palustrine Emergent (PEM)/Palustrine Forested (PFO) wetland. WL2 was classified as a PEM wetland. WL1 and WL2 are further discussed in Section 5.2. One jurisdictional stream was observed within the project study area and identified as Stream 1. On -Site jurisdictional waters of the U.S. are UTs to Stoney Creek and are located within the Upper Pee Dee River basin (CU 03040105). Stoney Creek is classified as "Class C waters" by the North Carolina Division of Water Resources (NCDWR). Class C waters are freshwaters identified for aquatic life propagation/protection. A non -jurisdictional ditch was identified within the project study area at the time of field review and identified as Non -Jurisdictional Stream 2. Stream 1 and Stream 2 are discussed further is Section 5.3. Page 3 of 11 Charlotte Mecklenburg Storm Water Services Prosperity Ridge Road Enhancement Project USACE Individual (Standard) Permit Application Project #13110437.08 Two detention ponds were identified within the project study area. One detention pond measured 0.15 -acre and the other measured 0.03 -acre. No lakes are within the vicinity of the Project site. See Figure 2, Project Study Area, in Appendix A. 4.0 ]USRISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION 4.1. Methodology On October 31, 2011, GAI surveyed and preliminarily classified on-site jurisdictional waters of the U.S. using the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) - Routine On -Site Determination Method. This method is defined in the 1987 Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual (USACE, 1987) and the Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Interim Regional Supplement. Wetland Determination Data Forms representative of WL1 and WL2 as well as representative non -jurisdictional upland areas are included in Appendix D. Two stream channels were identified during the field investigation (Streams 1 and 2). Jurisdictional waters of the U.S. were classified according to NCDWR and USACE guidance. Also, NCDWR Stream Classification Forms and USACE Stream Quality Assessment Worksheets for on-site streams are included in Appendix D. 4.2. Survey Summary The topography of the approximate 2.0 acre project site is shown on Figure 4, USGS Topo in Appendix B. The field survey identified one jurisdictional stream channel (Stream 1), one non - jurisdictional stream channel (Stream 2) and two jurisdictional wetlands within the project area as shown on Figure 5 in Appendix B. An Approved Jurisdictional Determination Form for these features is included in Appendix D. Stream 1, a UT to Stoney Creek, flows southeast through the Project area and crosses under Ridge Road (Figure 3). Stream 1 was classified as perennial relatively permanent waters (RPW) and exhibited a 3-4 foot wide ordinary high water mark (OHWM). Stream 1 exhibited a well defined bed and bank, moderate flow and sinuosity and substrate consisting of silt, sand, gravel and small cobble. Stream 1 rated 51 out of a possible 100 points on the USACE Stream Quality Assessment Form and scored 31 out of 60 possible points on the NCDWR Stream Classification Form (Appendix D). Photographs of Stream 1 are included in Appendix E as Photographs 1-3. Stream 2, also an UT to Stoney Creek, flows parallel to the south side of Ridge Road in a southwesterly direction until its confluence with Stream 1 (Figure 3). Stream 2 is a non - jurisdictional roadside swale located in maintained upland lawns. Stream 2 classified as a non - jurisdictional ditch through uplands and exhibited no sinuosity or groundwater flow. The substrate within Stream 2 consists primarily of silt and vegetation. Non -jurisdictional Stream 2 rated 26 out of a possible 100 points on the USACE Stream Quality Assessment Form and scored 10 out of 60 possible points on the NCDWR Stream Classification Form (Appendix D). A photograph of Stream 2 is enclosed included in Appendix E as Photograph 4. Page 4 of 11 Charlotte Mecklenburg Storm Water Services Prosperity Ridge Road Enhancement Project USACE Individual (Standard) Permit Application Project #13110437.08 Wetland 1, designated as WL1, is classified as a Palustrine Emergent (PEM)/Palustrine Forested (PFO) wetland and is located north of Ridge Road, abutting Stream 1 (Photographs 5 and 6). WL 1 is approximately 0.23 acre in size. This wetland exhibited inundation, saturation to the surface, water stained leaves and drainage patterns. Dominant vegetation identified within WL1 included common rush (Juncus effusus), cattail (Typha latifolia), seedbox (Ludwigia alternafolia), hazel alder (A/nus serru/ata), eastern cottonwood (Popu/us deltoides) and various sedges (Carexspp). Soils sampled within WL1 exhibited a low-chroma matrix (2.5Y 4/2) with redox concentrations in the matrix and pore linings (7.5YR 4/6). Soils sampled within WL1 met the criteria for the depleted matrix hydric soil indicator (F3). Wetland 2, designated WL2, is classified as a PEM wetland and is located south of Ridge Road, abutting Stream 1 (Photograph 7). WL2 is approximately 0.01 acre in size and is maintained by mowing. This wetland exhibited saturation to the surface, crayfish mounds, sediment deposits, water stained leaves and drainage patterns. Dominant vegetation identified within WL2 included watercress (Nasturtium ofcinale), fescue (Festuca so.), polygonum (Polygonum sp.) and various sedges. Due to the vegetation maintenance within Wetland 2, certain species could not be identified beyond the genus level. Soils sampled within WL2 exhibited a low-chroma matrix (2.5Y 4/1) with redox concentrations in the matrix (7.5YR 4/6). Soils sampled within WL2 met the criteria for the depleted matrix hydric soil indicator (F3). Jurisdictional Determination Verification Request On behalf of SWS, GAI is requesting written verification of the jurisdictional determination of the aquatic resources discussed above (Stream 1, Stream 2, WL1 and WL2). Details regarding construction and impacts to jurisdictional waters are discussed in Section 4.0, Proposed Impacts Inventory. See Approved Jurisdictional Determination Form in Appendix D. 5.0 PROPOSED IMPACTS INVENTORY Impacts Summary Construction of this Project will result in unavoidable impacts to on-site jurisdictional waters of the U.S. The proposed Project will result in 372 LF of permanent impacts and 155 LF of temporary impacts to jurisdictional Stream 1, and 0.24 acre of permanent impacts to jurisdictional wetlands, WL1 and WL2. Stream 1 will be impacted by the replacement of existing culverts necessary for proper management of stormwater runoff from the final connector segment. The existing 36 -inch, double 75 -foot long reinforced concrete pipes (RCP) under Ridge Road will be removed and be replaced with three lengths (118 If, 179 If, and 36 If) of 8 -foot by 4 -foot RCP culverts. Sections 5.2 through 5.5 describe potential impacts to jurisdictional aquatic resources within the Project boundaries. See details on select Project Plan and Profile Sheet SD -1, Wetlands and Stream Impact Aerial, and Sheets 7 though 11 in Appendix F. Wetland Impacts Approximately 0.24 acre of wetlands (0.23 acre of WL1 and 0.01 acre of WL2) will potentially be impacted from construction of the proposed roadway Enhancement project. Construction of roadway side slopes will result in the permanent placement of fill within WL1 and WL2. Wetland impacts are depicted on Sheet SD -1 of SD -6 of the Storm Plan and Profile in Appendix F. Page 5 of 11 Charlotte Mecklenburg Storm Water Services Prosperity Ridge Road Enhancement Project USACE Individual (Standard) Permit Application Project #13110437.08 Under the proposed Project plans, a portion of Stream 1 will be relocated and directed into an upgraded and extended pipe system that will carry the flow under the proposed intersection of Prosperity Ridge Road and Ridge Road. Stream 1 currently flows through an existing 75 LF dual 36 inch RCP culvert under Ridge Road. The existing culvert will be replaced with an extended 8 -foot by 4 -foot RCP box culvert pipe system, totaling 333 LF, installed beneath the proposed connector segment of Prosperity Ridge Road and under the existing Ridge Road. The proposed 8' wide single box culvert that will provide additional hydraulic capacity at lower stages than the dual 36" pipes and a 50 -year event or greater level of service for roadway flooding. Approximately 344 LF of Stream 1 upstream of the pipe system will be relocated and/or filled to facilitate flow into the new pipe system. Approximately 85 LF of new channel will be constructed to match the new pipe inlet. This relocated portion of Stream 1 will transition from the existing channel through a series of three boulder step structures over 85 LF, with channel improvements between the boulder step structures. These boulder step structures will be constructed to provide the necessary vertical transition and to adequately dissipate velocities before entering the proposed box culvert pipe system. Average rock size for the boulders used will be 2x2'x1.5', with the header rock being a minimum of 2'x1'x1'. Filter fabric will be installed from the middle of the header boulder and extend downward to the depth of the bottom footer boulder, and then upstream for a minimum of six feet. A mix of Class A and B rip rap will be used to fill the upstream side of each structure. The channel improvements will include lining the toe of the banks with Class I rip rap with filter fabric underneath and installing temporary erosion control matting and vegetation along the upper portion of the bank. Please note that the 10 -year velocity exceeds the recommended permissible velocity and sheer stress limits from soil or synthetic matting, thereby requiring the use of rip rap toe stabilization. Downstream of Ridge Road, the proposed pipe system will be extended 39 feet beyond the existing culvert outlet to allow for the construction of a sidewalk. Below the proposed outlet, flows will discharge to a 38 linear foot stilling basin. The basin will be constructed of Class I rip - rap with filter fabric under the rip -rap. This stilling basin will also assist with water quality by slowing flow velocity and allowing sediment to settle out. From the stilling basin, an additional 27 LF of Stream 1 will be reshaped and the toe of the banks will be stabilized with rip rap before tying back into the original channel. The channel improvements will be the same as mentioned previously. See details on Sheet SD -1 of SD -6 of the Storm Plan and Profile and Wetlands and Stream Impact Aerial in Appendix F for impacts to Stream 1. Due to construction of a new sidewalk extension along the south side of Ridge Road, the approximate 100 LF of non -jurisdictional Stream 2 will be relocated in to an 18 -inch diameter storm water piping system. Details for impacts to non -jurisdictional Stream 2 are shown on Sheet SD -1 of SD -6 of the Storm Plan and Profile in Appendix F. Page 6 of 11 Charlotte Mecklenburg Storm Water Services Prosperity Ridge Road Enhancement Project USACE Individual (Standard) Permit Application Project #13110437.08 Impacts to Waters of the U.S. are summarized in Table 2 below. Pond or Lake Construction Construction of the proposed Project will not affect the two detention ponds measuring approximately 0.15 -acre and 0.03 -acre, nor require pond or lake construction. 5.5. Buffer Impacts Stream 1 is subject to City of Charlotte Post -Construction Stormwater Ordinance. To comply with Section 18-143, Standards for the Central Catawba district, a minimum 30 -foot vegetated buffer (including a ten -foot zone adjacent to the bank) will be implemented. Disturbed buffer areas will be revegetated and disturbance of the ten -foot zone adjacent to the stream bank will be stabilized using rip -rap. 6.0 IMPACT JUSTIFICATION AND MITIGATION 6.1. Avoidance and Minimization Impacts to jurisdictional waters of the U.S. within the Project boundaries have been reduced to the maximum extent practicable. The design allows for: (1) proper connection of Prosperity Ridge Road subdivision stub -out —to- Prosperity Ridge Road south and South Prosperity Ridge Road —to- Ridge Road; Page 7 of 11 ImpactsTable 2: Summary of Jurisdictional Plan Sheet Impacts Feature (Location) Activity Permanent Temporary Channel relocation and fill for new Prosperity Stream 1 SD -1 Ridge Road segment and pipe system 344 LF 0 installation (upstream of Ridge Road) SD -1 Stream enhancement within existing channel Stream 1 to facilitate transition to relocated channel and 0 52 LF (Sta. 124+00 — 124+60) pipe system (upstream of Ridge Road) Stream 1 SD -1 Pipe system extension beyond existing culvert LF 0 (Sta. 119+85 — 120+23) outlet ( downstream of Ridge Road)39 9 SD -1 Stream 1 Rip rap stilling basin at pipe system outlet 38 LF 0 (Sta. 119+47 — 119+85) Stream 1 SD -1 Stream enhancements and bank stabilization 0 27 LF (Sta. 119+20 — 119+47) downstream of stilling basin 9 Wetland 1 SD -1 Fill 0.23 Ac. 0 Wetland 2 SD -1 Fill 0.01 Ac. 0 Total Impacts for Streams 421 LF 79 LF Total Impacts for Wetlands 0.24 Ac. 0 Pond or Lake Construction Construction of the proposed Project will not affect the two detention ponds measuring approximately 0.15 -acre and 0.03 -acre, nor require pond or lake construction. 5.5. Buffer Impacts Stream 1 is subject to City of Charlotte Post -Construction Stormwater Ordinance. To comply with Section 18-143, Standards for the Central Catawba district, a minimum 30 -foot vegetated buffer (including a ten -foot zone adjacent to the bank) will be implemented. Disturbed buffer areas will be revegetated and disturbance of the ten -foot zone adjacent to the stream bank will be stabilized using rip -rap. 6.0 IMPACT JUSTIFICATION AND MITIGATION 6.1. Avoidance and Minimization Impacts to jurisdictional waters of the U.S. within the Project boundaries have been reduced to the maximum extent practicable. The design allows for: (1) proper connection of Prosperity Ridge Road subdivision stub -out —to- Prosperity Ridge Road south and South Prosperity Ridge Road —to- Ridge Road; Page 7 of 11 Charlotte Mecklenburg Storm Water Services Prosperity Ridge Road Enhancement Project USACE Individual (Standard) Permit Application Project #13110437.08 (2) upgrade of existing storm drainage infrastructure to meet design standards for existing and future conditions; (3) minimization of impacts to adjacent properties and structures; and (4) tie-in with the proposed residential subdivision entrance on the south side of Ridge Road. Given these engineering and construction goals, several alternatives were evaluated. The main area of impacts to jurisdictional waters is upstream (north) of Ridge Road. At this location, impacts generally result from construction of the new segment of Prosperity Ridge Road that connects with Ridge Road. The location of this road segment is dictated by the existing Prosperity Ridge Road alignment, stub -out location, and proximity to adjacent structures and properties. There is no opportunity to adjust the footprint or fill limits of the road. Outside of the actual road footprint, the proposed storm drainage design and alignment will result in impacts to jurisdictional waters. This proposed storm drainage design was evaluated for avoidance and minimization opportunities. Alternative improvement analysis revealed multiple challenges, including: physical grade constraints of the roadways; proximity and elevation of existing buildings/structures; existing utilities within the roadway; and existing drainage system alignment and grade. Jurisdictional impacts upstream of the proposed Prosperity Ridge Road are due to the extension of the upgraded pipe system and the location of the inlet of the pipe system, which is shifted away from the existing alignment of Stream 1. This alignment necessitates relocation of the stream with enhancement of the relocated channel and existing channel immediately upstream of the relocated channel. The existing dual 36" RCPs will be replaced with an 8' x 3' RCBC at an average 0.50% slope. The proposed design, including extension and alignment, are necessary to: • provide additional hydraulic capacity at lower stages than the existing dual 36" pipes; • provide for a 50 -year event or greater level of service for roadway flooding; • accommodate the road widening and provide adequate clear zone per design standards; • minimize flooding potential for adjacent structures and minimize impacts (abandonment) to the existing upstream channel and wooded areas; and • minimize extent of impacts upstream and downstream by raising the proposed culvert slightly: minimal cover between the proposed finished roadway grade and the top of the RCBC and the required minimal clearance between the bottom of the RCBC and the 16" water main and 8" sanitary sewer. (Note: Installation of a larger size culvert to provide a natural bottom, either buried 1' or a bottomless arch culvert, is not possible without relocation of a 16" water main, additional sanitary sewer relocation, approximately 200' of additional channel improvements upstream and downstream to tie-in, and a complete road closure of the thoroughfare for an extended duration.) A design alternative that included shifting the inlet to the west, and thereby line up better with the current stream channel alignment, was considered in an effort to minimize channel fill and relocation impacts. However, hydraulic and hydrologic analyses indicate that this alignment would increase flooding at the intersection and of adjacent building structure at 4902 Ridge Road. This adjacent structure is currently at the same elevation of the existing roadway but will be lower than the proposed roadway after construction. These flood concerns dictated that the inlet be relocated to its proposed location. Page 8 of 11 Charlotte Mecklenburg Storm Water Services Prosperity Ridge Road Enhancement Project USACE Individual (Standard) Permit Application Project #13110437.08 Improvements to the relocated and existing channel upstream of the proposed pipe system inlet are also intended to minimize impacts. Storm water is currently directed across the entire parcel at 6902 Ridge Road and to the existing channel and ultimately the road crossing. The proposed upstream channel improvements include: • re -grading the areas adjacent to the roadways to relocate the 'glow point" of the system from the northwest curb return to the headwall; • grading to establish a new channel alignment; • providing grade control structures within the new upstream channel segment to provide vertical transition and to minimize length of impacts to the existing channel and upstream wooded areas; and • incorporating channel section improvements with a rip rap toe to tie-in to the existing channel and to minimize scour and bank erosion. A vertical drop of over 3' is needed to connect the existing channel into the proposed crossing. (Note: the 10 -year velocity is approximately 4.6 fps and exceeds the recommended permissible velocity and sheer stress limits for soil or synthetic matting. A significant amount of overland runoff will be entering the channel from the west side and the potential for bank erosion at the new channel location and crossing inlet is higher resulting in the need for structural stabilization.) Potential adverse water quality impacts associated with construction stormwater runoff will be managed in accordance with NCDENR NPDES General Construction Stormwater Permit, NCG01000, and the SWS procedures. Compensatory Mitigation Proposed permanent impacts total approximately 421 LF of jurisdictional stream channel and 0.24 acre of jurisdictional wetlands. Approximately 292 LF of stream bed will be relocated into a new 85 LF channel with a boulder step structure sequence on the intake side of the box culvert. The City proposes that this 85 LF channel segment provide on-site mitigation at a 1:1 ratio. Additional off-site mitigation is proposed at a 2:1 ratio. The City proposes to utilize the current balance of 318 stream mitigation credits in the Rocky watershed (Pee -Dee River Basin, HU 03040105) from the City's Umbrella Stream and Mitigation Bank (Bank). The City proposes to complete the required stream mitigation by making an in -lieu fee payment to the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) for 354 stream mitigation credits. To compensate for the 0.24 acre impacts to wetlands WL1 and WL2, the City is proposing to mitigate at a 2:1 ratio and purchase 0.50 wetland mitigation credits from the NCEEP. In a letter dated December 2, 2013, the NCEEP acknowledged that credits are available in the Yadkin (HUC 03040105) River Basin. Following USACE approval, the City will remit payment to the NCEEP for the credit purchase. The proposed compensatory mitigation measures are outlined in Table 3. Page 9 of 11 Charlotte Mecklenburg Storm Water Services Prosperity Ridge Road Enhancement Project USACE Individual (Standard) Permit Application Project #13110437.08 7.0 STORMWATER MANAGEMENT The Project will result in approximately 2.0 acres of land disturbance. The estimated impervious surface is approximately 0.80 -acre of asphaltic pavement for the proposed connecting segments. Since the total land disturbance is greater than 1.0 acres, no land disturbing activity will commence without an approved NCDENR Erosion and Sediment Control (E&SC) Plan. Upon receiving E&SC Plan approval, the project will be automatically covered under the state's NPDES Stormwater General Permit NCGO10000 for construction -related activities. The E&SC Plan and copy of General Permit NCGO10000 will be retained on-site by the contractor. Additionally, the drainage structures and stream channel enhancements, tree protection areas, Surface Water Improvement and Management (SWIM) stream buffers and best management practices (BMPs) incorporated into the Project plans are designed to minimize adverse impact to streams water quality. Further, to minimize adverse impacts to nearby surface waters, BMPs to be implemented include silt fence, sediment traps, erosion control matting, and temporary seeding. Upon completion of construction, disturbed areas will be seeded and mulched per Plan specifications. Silt fencing and tree protection measures will remain in place until disturbed areas are satisfactorily re- vegetated to minimize erosion and sedimentation. See Appendix G, Sheets ECP1 and ECP2, for details on erosion control measures. Erosion and sediment controls will be inspected after each phase of the project and in accordance with the E&SC Plan and General Permit NCG010000 conditions. Page 10 of 11 ProposedTable 3: Summary of Jurisdictional Mitigation Permanent Impacts Mitigation Measure Ratio Feature Provided On-site mitigation through construction of an 1:1 85 LF 85 LF enhanced relocated channel Purchase of 318 stream mitigation credits from the City's Umbrella Stream and 2:1 159 LF Stream 1 421 LF Mitigation Bank In -lieu fee payment to the NCEEP for 354 2:1 177 LF stream mitigation credits Total Stream Mitigation Provided 421 LF Wetlands 1 In -lieu fee payment to the NCEEP for 0.5 and 2 0.24 Ac. acre of riparian wetland credits 2:1 0.25 Ac. 7.0 STORMWATER MANAGEMENT The Project will result in approximately 2.0 acres of land disturbance. The estimated impervious surface is approximately 0.80 -acre of asphaltic pavement for the proposed connecting segments. Since the total land disturbance is greater than 1.0 acres, no land disturbing activity will commence without an approved NCDENR Erosion and Sediment Control (E&SC) Plan. Upon receiving E&SC Plan approval, the project will be automatically covered under the state's NPDES Stormwater General Permit NCGO10000 for construction -related activities. The E&SC Plan and copy of General Permit NCGO10000 will be retained on-site by the contractor. Additionally, the drainage structures and stream channel enhancements, tree protection areas, Surface Water Improvement and Management (SWIM) stream buffers and best management practices (BMPs) incorporated into the Project plans are designed to minimize adverse impact to streams water quality. Further, to minimize adverse impacts to nearby surface waters, BMPs to be implemented include silt fence, sediment traps, erosion control matting, and temporary seeding. Upon completion of construction, disturbed areas will be seeded and mulched per Plan specifications. Silt fencing and tree protection measures will remain in place until disturbed areas are satisfactorily re- vegetated to minimize erosion and sedimentation. See Appendix G, Sheets ECP1 and ECP2, for details on erosion control measures. Erosion and sediment controls will be inspected after each phase of the project and in accordance with the E&SC Plan and General Permit NCG010000 conditions. Page 10 of 11 Charlotte Mecklenburg Storm Water Services Prosperity Ridge Road Enhancement Project USACE Individual (Standard) Permit Application Project #13110437.08 8.0 SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION 8.1. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat A letter was forwarded to the North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) on December 2, 2011 to determine the presence of any federally -listed, candidate endangered, threatened species or critical habitat located within the proposed Project area. A letter dated December 7, 2011 was received from NCNHP stating that no records of rare, significant natural communities, significant natural heritage areas, or conservation/managed areas are at the project site or within 0.7 miles surrounding the project site. Additionally, the probability for the occurrence of federally -listed, candidate endangered, threatened species or critical habitat is very low since the Project area is currently dominated by single-family homes having maintained lawns with minimal wooded areas. In a U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) letter dated April 9, 2012, a survey for Schweinitz's sunflower (Heiianthus schweinitzii) was requested for the Project site. GAI performed a pedestrian survey within the FWS optimal survey window for Schweinitz's sunflower on October 24, 2013. The approximate 1.50 acre study area centered on the project's proposed 0.83 acre of non -forested land disturbance. Potential habitat (an approximate 0.20 -acre area) for the Schweinitz's sunflower is located at the terminus of the existing paved Prosperity Ridge Road "split" near an approximate 0.15 -acre detention pond. The Schweinitz's sunflower was not observed during the site investigation in the project study area. In fact no specimens of the genus Heiianthus were found in the project area. The Schweinitz's sunflower assessment report is provided in Appendix H for reference. Essential Fish Habitat According to the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) National Marine Fish Service (NMFS), the Project area does not contain essential fish habitat. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources A letter was forwarded to the NC State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) on December 2, 2011 to determine the presence of architectural, historic, or archaeological significant areas that would be affected by the Project. A letter dated December 15, 2011 was received from SHPO stating no historic resources would be affected by the Project. See agency correspondence in Appendix C. Flood Zone Designation Review of Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) GIS layer indicates that the Project area is not within nor does it contain a regulated floodplain. 9.0 REFERENCES USACE, Environmental Laboratory. "Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual," Technical Report Y-87-1, US Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, Mississippi. North Carolina Division of Water Quality, 2003. Stream Classification Method. Version 4.11. U.S. Geological Survey, 1974. Hydrologic Unit Map, State of North Carolina. Page 11 of 11 APPENDIX A NCDOT Indirect and Cumulative Effects (ICE) Analysis RECEIVED By Matt Magnasco at 9:07 am, May 08, 2012 STIP Project R -2248E 1-485 from NC 115 to 1-85 North in Mecklenburg County Indirect Screening and Land Use Scenario Assessment July 9, 2009 INDIRECT SCREENING AND LAND USE SCENARIO ASSESSMENT REPORT Proposed New Location Project STIP Project R -2248E, WBS # 34410.1.24 1-485 from NC 115 to 1-85 North Mecklenburg County Executive Summary STIP Project R -2248E is a proposed new location freeway (1-485) between NC 115 and 1-85 in Mecklenburg County. The proposed project is approximately 5.4 miles in length and is the final new location segment for the planned 1-485 urban loop around the City of Charlotte. According to the October 2008 Citizens Informational Workshop handout, the primary purpose of STIP R - 2248E is to complete the Charlotte Outer Loop. Once completed, STIP Project R -2248E in conjunction with STIP Project R-2123CE (1-85/1-485 interchange modification), will provide a high- speed, freeway connection between 1-77 and 1-85 in Northern Mecklenburg County. STIP R - 2248E will enable drivers to travel across Northern Charlotte more efficiently by providing motorists with an alternative route to NC 24 (Harris Boulevard). The construction of STIP Project R -2248E will also provide through traffic to bypass the congested sections of 1-77 and 1-85 adjacent to Uptown Charlotte. Modifications to the 1-485/1-85 interchange will be constructed under a separate project (STIP Project R-2123CE). A Future Land Use Study Area was delineated to identify the area around the project that could, in combination with other actions, experience land use changes as a result of STIP Project R - 2248E. Although it is the focus for data collection and analysis contained within this report, it is not meant to infer that land use effects will be felt throughout the Future Land Use Study Area. Figure 1 displays the Future Land Use Study Area boundaries. Indirect and cumulative effects associated with STIP Project R -2248E are assessed through 2030. This time frame is consistent with locally adopted transportation and land use plans, as well as the population projections from the North Carolina Office of State Budget and Management. Based on NC One Map GIS information, notable features within the Future Land Use Study Area include two airports, one helipad, eight schools, one hazardous disposal site, eight historic study list structures, and three historic sites or districts listed on the National Register of Historic Places, including the Croft Historic District. Field observations and input from local officials revealed four additional schools in the Future Land Use Study Area. Based on site visit observations, three of these additional schools are currently under construction. STIP Project R -2248E is located within sub -basin (03-07-11) of the Yadkin Pee Dee River Basin and sub -basins (03-08-33; 03-08-34) of the Catawba River Basin. There is one Water Supply Watershed (Class IV) within the Future Land Use Study Area - the Mountain Island Lake Water Supply Watershed of the Catawba River Basin (see Figure 2). Within the Future Land Use Study Area, Rocky River and Clarke Creek are both listed on the North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources (NCDENR's) 2006 Final 303(d) List. Clarke Creek is listed as having impaired biologic integrity from its source to Rocky River. The section of Rocky River from its source to the mouth of Reedy Creek is listed as having impaired biological integrity and violating standards for turbidity and fecal coliform. Based on USGS quadrangles encompassing the Future Land Use Study Area, the Carolina heelsplitter and WBS # 34410.1.24 STIP Project R -2248E 1-485 from NC 115 to 1-85 North in Mecklenburg County Indirect Screening and Land Use Scenario Assessment July 9, 2009 Schweinitz's sunflower are listed as federally endangered species and are listed in two of the four quadrangles reviewed. GIS data from NC One Map indicates there are five designated Significant Natural Heritage Areas within the Future Land Use Study Area (see Figure 2). These areas include the Trails End Lane Post Oak Upland, Bingham Road Hardpan Forest, the Ridge Road Hardpan Forest, Mallard Creek Sunflower Site, and the Clarke Creek Heron Rookery. Direct effects to natural environmental resources are avoided, minimized, mitigated, and/or enhanced and will be further evaluated by NCDOT Natural Environment Unit (NEU) during project permitting. According to information provided by the NCDOT NEU, concurrence is currently being requested from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service regarding two Schweinitz's sunflower populations that occur very close to the project. NCDOT NEU is currently working with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, City of Charlotte, and Mecklenburg County to identify and evaluate preliminary commitments intended to limit potential direct and indirect effects to the two Schweinitz's sunflower populations as a result of the proposed project. As part of this assessment, an Indirect Land Use Effects Screening Matrix was developed which qualitatively assesses factors that influence land development decisions. Each factor receives a rating from high concern for indirect effects to less concern for indirect effects. Based on the information gathered, the factors in the screening tool indicate a moderate to high concern for indirect effects as a result of the project. Despite comprehensive growth management policies, the scope of project, change in accessibility, forecasted population growth, availability of land, availability of water/sewer service, and market for development suggest further evaluation of indirect effects is warranted. Consequently, a Land Use Scenario Assessment was also completed. The purpose of this assessment was to evaluate whether indirect and cumulative effects are anticipated, both with and without the project, and to evaluate where these effects are most probable. There are three sub -areas within the Future Land Use Study Area identified as probable development areas (see Figure 3): the NC 115 interchange area, the Prosperity Church Road interchange area, and the Mallard Creek Road/Odell School Road interchange area. Based on a close examination of these three probable development areas, the construction of STIP Project R - 2248E has the potential to influence the timing and intensity of planned development within the Future Land Use Study Area. However, the potential effects to water quality as a result of this planned development will be tempered by existing land use controls and development regulations covering watershed protection, stream buffers, erosion and sedimentation control, and post - construction runoff. Given the minimal indirect effects of the project, any contribution of the project to cumulative effects resulting from current and planned development patterns should be minimal. For these reasons, potential indirect and cumulative effects to downstream water quality should be minimal. No additional ICE study is recommended. WBS # 34410.1.24 STIP Project R -2248E 1-485 from NC 115 to 1-85 North in Mecklenburg County Indirect Screening and Land Use Scenario Assessment July 9, 2009 Indirect and Cumulative Effects Introduction This report documents the information used to assess any future land use changes that could occur as a result of STIP Project R -2248E. The predicted changes, if any, require action from a non-NCDOT party to occur. The majority of measures taken to avoid, minimize, and decrease the potential effects associated with future land use changes in the Future Land Use Study Area would also be coordinated with these parties. Project Overview STIP Project R -2248E is a proposed new location freeway (1-485) between NC 115 and 1-85 in Mecklenburg County. The proposed project is approximately 5.4 miles in length and is the final new location segment for the planned 1-485 urban loop around the City of Charlotte. The project includes construction of a new split diamond interchange with Prosperity Church Road and a single point urban interchange with Mallard Creek Road/Odell School Road. Additionally, the project would complete construction of the 1-485/NC 115 interchange by adding interchange ramps to accommodate travel from NC 115 to eastbound 1-485 and westbound 1-485 to NC 115. The proposed right-of-way for the new location freeway is approximately 350 feet with wider areas proposed at the interchanges. The design speed for the project is 70 miles per hour. Construction of the 1-485/1-85 interchange will be completed as a separate project (STIP Project R-2123CE). In addition to the interchanges, the proposed project includes construction of the following grade separations: • 1-485 over Norfolk Southern Railroad; • 1-485 over Eastfield Road; • Browne Road over 1-485; • 1-485 over planned City of Charlotte Northeast Collector Street between Johnston -Oehler Road and Ridge Road Three bridges will also be constructed over an unnamed stream west of the proposed Mallard Creek Road/Odell School Road interchange (two mainline bridges and one interchange ramp bridge). According to the October 2008 Citizens Informational Workshop handout, the primary purpose of STIP R -2248E is to complete the Charlotte Outer Loop. Once completed, STIP Project R -2248E in conjunction with STIP Project R-2123CE (1-85/1-485 interchange modification), will provide a high-speed, freeway connection between 1-77 and 1-85 in Northern Mecklenburg County. STIP R -2248E will enable drivers to travel across Northern Charlotte more efficiently by providing motorists with an alternative route to NC 24 (Harris Boulevard). The construction of STIP Project R -2248E will also allow through traffic to bypass the congested sections of 1-77 and 1-85 adjacent to Uptown Charlotte. Modifications to the 1-485/1-85 interchange will be constructed under a separate project (STIP Project R-2123CE). Full control of access is proposed for the entire new location freeway segment. The proposed right-of-way is approximately 350 feet with wider areas at the proposed interchanges. The proposed typical section for the proposed freeway segment is eight 12 -foot travel lanes with a 46 - foot median. Twelve foot paved inside and outside shoulders are also proposed. According to the traffic forecast for STIP Project R-2123CE dated July 15, 2008, the estimated 2008 average annual daily traffic volumes on the proposed freeway range from 65,400 vehicles per day (vpd) east of the Mallard Creek Road interchange to 66,600 vpd west of the same WBS # 34410.1.24 STIP Project R -2248E 1-485 from NC 115 to 1-85 North in Mecklenburg County Indirect Screening and Land Use Scenario Assessment July 9, 2009 interchange. By 2035, projected traffic volumes are expected to be between 153,600 vpd east of the Mallard Creek Road interchange and 155,800 vpd west of the same interchange. Based on the preliminary design information provided by NCDOT in April 2009, there is only one alternative under consideration as the build alternative. !'he following intersecting roads (see Figure 1) will also be modified/constructed as part of the proposed project: • Realign Eastfield Road to intersect with Alexanderana Road and NC 115 north of the proposed freeway. Includes construction of a grade separated crossing of the Norfolk Southern Railroad • Realign Johnston -Oehler Road, portions of Prosperity Ridqe Road, and portions of Prosperity Church Road to connect with the proposed split diamond interchange configuration • Construct Loganville Drive (including the bridge over 1-485) between Ridge Road and relocated Johnston -Oehler Road • Construct a new location two-lane frontage road immediately north of the mainline corridor between Waverly Lynn Lane and Jimmy Oehler Road • Realign Mallard Creek Road, Odell School Road, Beard Road, and Ridge Road to connect with the proposed single point urban interchange configuration According to the NCDOT 2009-2015 State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP), right-of- way acquisition is scheduled to begin in 2010, with construction beginning in 2015. Project History The Final Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS) for the North Charlotte Outer Loop (1-485) was approved on January 29, 1992 under STIP Project R -2248B. As part of the FEIS and Record of Decision (ROD), the original design included a conventional diamond interchange with Prosperity Church Road. However, based on local planning efforts, a split -diamond interchange was identified as an option to better accommodate access requirements and proposed traffic volumes in the area. As a result, the proposed interchange configuration was re-evaluated as a Categorical Exclusion (CE). The 1-485 and Prosperity Church Road Interchange Study CE was approved by the Federal Highway Administration in May 2006. Based on the analyses contained within the CE, the split -diamond interchange configuration was identified as the Preferred Alternative. As part of the CE, an assessment of potential indirect and cumulative impacts (ICI) was also completed for the two interchange configurations under consideration. The Prosperity Church Road interchange ICI assessment concluded that development within the ICI study area has preceded the construction of STIP Project R -2248E. Development trends throughout Mecklenburg County would suggest that further infill development in the ICI study area and new development in the areas north of Eastfield Road would continue regardless of whether the proposed interchange at Prosperity Church Road were constructed. However, the ICI concluded that construction of the interchange will inevitably accelerate the timeline for development in these areas. According to the ICI assessment, the overall indirect and cumulative impacts associated with construction of the interchange relate to additional stormwater runoff and subsequent urban pollutants placed into the watershed with the intensification of development near the proposed interchange. However, the implementation of Best Management Practices (BMPs) and stormwater programs run by local governments would ameliorate stormwater issues from any new development. WBS # 34410.1.24 Coddle Creek 73 Lake Norman r:. � � � 0 i i a. Iry UnterS d vine -Concord f / I A i tV`e 29 Creek i - - - - - 0�d r C�aI -� o��'a Huntersville .� T - -- Concord s U Q i Q1 _ _ i a, J4 21 e �... c a s29 d ❑ ��❑ �" r �a a. M1l1se �J A/exanae� ��C ❑❑❑000e�C�c� tr�oac �o�❑ooh 0,� � ch°� `�`� hnstio CIOh ppJO > R o - Mountain Island Lake o 115 , y _ - a° sl ✓ � avid Cox Rd • - ek ChUr t \ �� h Ra \ I Z \^ r 03 G) �� - Harrisburg v` G Charlotte 4 29 o�So�/-' % �(�� North'Carolina Railroad her t - o �_• (01 ,I -o - � 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4Mile LEGEND: MAP SOURCES: Figure 1 North Carolina OneMap, http://www.nconemap.com North Carolina Department Transportation, http://www.ncdot.org o❑❑❑��❑ STIP Project R -2248E .T of ® FLUSA Railroad 0 Charlotte Future Land Use Study Area (FLUSA) �– Interstate Stream or Creek Concord 0 C US Route water Body Harrisburg STIP Project R -2248E Mecklenburg County —�— State Route �----i County 0 Huntersville � Mecklenburg County Local Road L---- Boundary July 2009 STIP Project R -2248E 1-485 from NC 115 to 1-85 North in Mecklenburg County Indirect Screening and Land Use Scenario Assessment July 9, 2009 Future Land Use Study Area The Future Land Use Study Area (FLUSA) is the area surrounding a project that could be indirectly affected as a result of the proposed project and other actions. This study area encompasses all of the areas examined for potential increases in development pressure as a result of project construction. Although it is the focus for data collection and analysis contained within this report, it is not meant to infer that land use effects will be felt throughout the Future Land Use Study Area. The area outlined in yellow and black on Figure 1 is the Future Land Use Study Area for STIP Project R -2248E. The Future Land Use Study Area is bounded to the north by: • SR 2136 (Gilead Road); • SR 2448 (Huntersville-Con cord Road); • SR 2426 (Huntersville-Concord Road); and • SR 1394 (Poplar Tent Road) To the east by: • Interstate 85 To the south by: • N C 24 To the west by: • Interstate 77 The Future Land Use Study Area contains portions of the municipalities of Charlotte, Huntersville, and Concord (Cabarrus County). Time Horizon The indirect and cumulative effects of STIP Project R -248E were evaluated between now and the year 2030. This time frame is consistent with locally adopted transportation and land use plans, as well as the population projections from the North Carolina Office of State Budget and Management. Other Transportation and Infrastructure Projects The 2009-2015 State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) includes several other projects that would be located in the Future Land Use Study Area. A summary of these projects is included below: • STIP Project 1-3803 is the widening of 1-85 from the US 29-49 Connector in Mecklenburg County to NC 73 in Cabarrus County. The project is approximately 12.8 miles in length. Section A is complete. Right-of-way acquisition for Section B is scheduled to begin in 2010 and construction is scheduled to begin in 2011. • STIP Project 1-3311 is the widening of 1-77 from 5t" Street in Charlotte to NC 73 (Sam Furr Road). The project is approximately 14.4 miles in length. Sections A, AA, and D are complete. Construction of Sections B and C are unfunded. Right of way acquisition for Section E is programmed for 2012. • STIP Project U-3415 is the widening of SR 1394 (Poplar Tent Road) from SR 1443 (Derita Road) to US 29-601 Bypass in Concord. The project is approximately 6.1 miles in length. Right-of-way acquisition for Section A is scheduled to begin in 2015. Construction is unfunded in the 2009-2015 STIP. • STIP Project U-4910 is the widening of SR 1445 (Derita Road) from SR 1394 (Poplar Tent Road) to SR 2894 (Concord Mills Boulevard). The project is approximately 2.6 miles in length. The project is being administered by the City of Concord and construction is scheduled to begin in 2010. WBS # 34410.1.24 STIP Project R -2248E 1-485 from NC 115 to 1-85 North in Mecklenburg County Indirect Screening and Land Use Scenario Assessment July 9, 2009 • STIP Project R-2123CE is the reconstruction of the interchange at 1-485 (Charlotte Eastern Outer Loop) and 1-85. Right-of-way acquisition is scheduled to commence in 2012. Construction is not completely funded in the STIP. • STIP Project R-2420 is the extension of City Boulevard and the relocation of SR 2467 (Mallard Creek Road) to US 29-49. The total project length is approximately 2.1 miles. Sections B and BA are complete. Section C is under construction by the City of Charlotte. Section A is unfunded in the 2009-2015 STIP. • STIP Project U-2507 is the widening of SR 2467 (Mallard Creek Road) from SR 2480 (Sugar Creek Road) to SR 2472 (Mallard Creek Church Road). The total project is approximately 4.1 miles in length. Section B is complete. Right-of-way acquisition for Section A is scheduled to begin in 2009 and construction is scheduled to begin in 2011. The Mecklenburg -Union Metropolitan Planning Organization (MUMPO) 2030 Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP) includes several planned transportation projects in the Future Land Use Study Area. A listing of these planned projects, as well as their planning horizon, is included below: 2010 Horizon • Index 305: Widening of 1-77 northbound by one lane between 1-485 and Gilead Road (approximately 3.0 miles). Also known as STIP Project 1-3311 D. • Index 207: Six -lane new location freeway (1-485) between Oakdale Road and NC 115 (Old Statesville Road). Approximately 6.8 miles in length. Also known as STIP Project R -2248D. 2020 Horizon • Index 242: New location eight -lane freeway (1-485) between NC 115 and 1-85 North (approximately 5.4 miles). Also identified as STIP Project R -2248E. • Index 206: Revise 1-485/1-85 interchange. • Index 57: Widen NC 115 to a four -lane median divided facility between Harris Boulevard and 1-485 (approximately 2.56 miles). • Index 130: Widen 1-77 between 1-485 and NC 73 (approximately 5.76 miles) to accommodate six general purpose travel lanes and High Occupancy Vehicle (HOV) lanes. • Index 143: Widen Mallard Creek Road to four -lane median divided facility with bicycle lanes between Prosperity Church Road and 1-485 (approximately 1.82 miles). • Index 262: New location four -lane median divided facility with bicycle lanes (Alexanderana Road) between NC 115 and Eastfield Road (approximately 0.91 miles). • Index 196: Widen Alexanderana Road to a four -lane median divided facility with bicycle lanes between Mt. Holly-Huntersville Road and NC 115 (approximately 1.70 miles). • Index 110: Widen US 21 (Statesville Road) to a four -lane median divided facility with wide outside lanes between Harris Boulevard and Gilead Road (approximately 4.48 miles). • Index 165: Widen Hambright Road to a four -lane median divided facility with bicycle lanes between Mt. Holly-Huntersville Road and NC 115 (approximately 1.17 miles). • Index 455: Widen NC 115 (Old Statesville Road) to a four -lane median divided facility with bicycle lanes between 1-485 and Verhoeff Drive (approximately 2.25 miles). • Index 183: New location two-lane facility with bicycle lanes (Prosperity Ridge Road) from south of Panthersville Drive to Prosperity Church Road (approximately 1.39 miles). WBS # 34410.1.24 STIP Project R -2248E 1-485 from NC 115 to 1-85 North in Mecklenburg County Indirect Screening and Land Use Scenario Assessment July 9, 2009 • Index 187: New location four -lane median divided facility with bicycle lanes (Ridge Road Extension) between Eastfield Road and Prosperity Church Road (approximately 0.95 miles). • Index 186: Widen Ridge Road to a four -lane median divided facility with bicycle lanes between Prosperity Church Road and Beard Road (approximately 2.36 miles). Index 184: Widen Prosperity Ridge Road to a four -lane median divided facility with bicycle lanes between Prosperity Church Road and Eastfield Road (approximately 1.52 miles). 2030 Horizon • Index 166: New location four -lane median divided facility (Hambright Road Extension) between NC 115 and Eastfield Road (approximately 1.93 miles). • Index 453: Widen Hucks Road Extension between Sugar Creek Road and NC 115 (Old Statesville Road). Part on new location. Approximately 1.61 miles in length. • Index 233: Widen Eastfield Road to a four -lane median divided facility with bicycle lanes between Alexanderana Road and Prosperity Village Road (approximately 2.31 miles). • Index 52: Widen Odell School Road to a six -lane median divided facility with bicycle lanes between 1-485 and the Cabarrus County line (approximately 1. 13 miles). • Index 99: Widen Johnston -Oehler Road to a two-lane median divided facility with bicycle lanes between Prosperity Ridge Road and Mallard Creek Road (approximately 1.93 miles). • Index 265: Widen Huntersville-Concord Road to a two-lane median divided facility with bicycle lanes between NC 115 and Trails End Extension (approximately 1.65 miles). • Index 261: New location two-lane facility with bicycle lanes (Verhoeff Drive West) between US 21 and Mt. Holly-Huntersville Road. • Index 260: Widen Verhoeff Drive East to a two-lane facility with bicycle lanes between US 21 and NC 115. Part on new location. Approximately 0.66 miles length. • Index 234: Widen Eastfield Road to a four -lane median divided facility with bicycle lanes between Prosperity Village Road and the Cabarrus County line (approximately 1.68 miles). • Index 33: New location four -lane median divided facility with bicycle lanes (Hucks Road Extension) between Prosperity Church Road and Sugar Creek Road (approximately 0.81 miles). • Index 454: Widen Hucks Road Extension to a four -lane median divided facility with bicycle lanes between NC 115 (Old Statesville Road) and US 21 (Statesville Road). Part on new location. Approximately 1.04 miles in length. • Index 182: Widen Prosperity Church Road to a two-lane facility with bicycle lanes between 1-485 and Prosperity Ridge Road. Part on new location. Approximately 0.64 miles in length. The Cabarrus-Rowan Metropolitan Planning Organization 2030 Long Range Transportation Plan includes two planned projects in the Future Land Use Study Area: • Widening of 1-85 to an eight -lane facility from Speedway Boulevard to NC 73. The LRTP indicates a horizon year of 2020. Project is segment of STIP Project 1-3803. • Widening of Poplar Tent Road to a four -lane facility from Mecklenburg County Line to Derita Road. The LRTP indicates a horizon year of 2030. WBS # 34410.1.24 STIP Project R -2248E 1-485 from NC 115 to 1-85 North in Mecklenburg County Indirect Screening and Land Use Scenario Assessment July 9, 2009 • Widening of Poplar Tent Road to a four -lane facility from Derita Road to the Westside Bypass. The LRTP indicates a horizon year of 2020. Project is also identified as STIP Project U-3415. • Widening of Derita Road from to a four -lane facility from Polar Tent Road to the Municipal Area Boundary. The LRTP indicates a horizon year of 2030. The Charlotte Area Transit System's 2030 Transit Corridor System Plan indicates that Phase I of the North Transit Corridor (Purple Line) between Charlotte and Mount Mourne (approximately 25 miles) will be completed by 2012. The preferred mode for the corridor is commuter rail and the general concept is to utilize the existing Norfolk Southern rail line. Phase I will provide a modest level rush hour and off-peak service between Huntersville, Cornelius, Davidson, Mount Mourne, and Uptown Charlotte. Phase 11 is scheduled to add increased service levels by 2019. The Concord Regional Airport 2010-2014 Transportation Improvement Program indicates several planned capital improvements projects at the airport. The majority of these projects are intended to maintain existing facilities. Although some improvement/expansion of terminal and aircraft hangar(s) is included in the program, Airport officials indicate there are no plans to construct additional runway capacity. The capital improvement program (CIP) for the Water and Sewer Authority of Cabarrus County (Fiscal Year 2008-2009 through Fiscal Year 2013-2014) indicates there is one sewer project planned for construction within the Future Land Use Study Area: King's Grant Parallel Interceptor Phase I — This project will add transmission capacity to the existing Rocky River Interceptor. Construction is scheduled for completion in December 2009. According to the Charlotte -Mecklenburg Utilities website', there are no water system capital improvement program (CIP) projects planned within the five-year (Fiscal Year 2009 through Fiscal Year 2013) planning horizon. However, the water system CIP project map showed two projects within the Future Land Use Study Area as part of the ten-year water system needs assessment: • Prosperity Church Road Extension water line • Statesville Road water line There are three sewer system capital improvement program (CIP) projects planned within the five-year (Fiscal Year 2009 through Fiscal Year 2013) planning horizon. Each of these three projects are planned expansions of the Rocky River Regional Wastewater Treatment Plan collection system scheduled for funding in the fifth year of the CIP plan. Transportation Impact Causing Activities The existing route between NC 115 and 1-85 in the Future Land Use Study Area consists of a circuitous path of local roads approximately 8.7 miles in length. With the construction of STIP Project R -2248E, traffic using local roads such as Huntersville-Concord Road, Eastfield Road, Ridge Road, Johnston -Oehler Road, and David Cox Road may decide to utilize the proposed freeway instead. This may provide some relief to the traffic congestion described by local officials. However, traffic on local roads between the proposed Mallard Creek Road interchange and 1-85 may also increase temporarily until the 1-485/1-85 interchange is constructed under STIP Project R- 2123CE. Assuming an average travel speed of 35 miles per hour, it is estimated this trip would take 1 http://www.charmeck.org/Departments/Utilities/Home.htm, accessed April 2009. WBS # 34410.1.24 STIP Project R -2248E 1-485 from NC 115 to 1-85 North in Mecklenburg County Indirect Screening and Land Use Scenario Assessment July 9, 2009 approximately 15 minutes. The construction of STIP Project R -2248E will provide a freeway connection between NC 115 and Mallard Creek Road/Odell School. The length of the proposed project is approximately 5.4 miles. Assuming an average travel speed of 65 miles per hour, it is estimated this trip would take approximately 5 minutes. Therefore, it is estimated that STIP Project R -2248E would provide a travel time savings of approximately 10 minutes. STIP Project R -2248E is a proposed freeway facility on new location with full control of access. Local officials indicated that proposed project would likely increase opportunities for commercial and residential development at or around the proposed interchanges. This would also likely increase traffic on feeder roads such as Prosperity Church Road, Mallard Creek Road, Derita Road/Odell School Road. Local officials also indicated that the proposed project would support existing industrial development patterns along the Derita Road/Odell School Road corridor. As discussed in the Project Overview section, several local transportation network modifications are also proposed as part of the project. Although these modifications are intended to maintain safe and efficient access to properties adjacent to the project corridor, some properties on intersecting roadways may see increased levels of accessibility and exposure as a result of the project. By providing a freeway connection between 1-77 and 1-85 with planned interchanges at NC 115, Prosperity Church Road, and Mallard Creek Road/Odell School Road, the proposed project would provide enhanced access to regional destinations located both within the Future Land Use Study Area (e.g., Concord Mills, Concord Regional Airport) and outside of it (e.g., Northlake Mall and Lowe's Motor Speedway). Population Trends / Projections In order to evaluate population characteristics in the Future Land Use Study Area, data from the North Carolina Office of State Budget and Management (NCOSBM) was analyzed for Mecklenburg and Cabarrus Counties. According to the NCOSBM, the population of Mecklenburg County grew at an annual rate of 3.1 % between 1997 and 2007, and Cabarrus County grew at a rate of 3.3% per year during the same time period. Between 2010 and 2030, the populations of Mecklenburg County and Cabarrus County are projected to grow at an annual rate of 4.5% and 4.8%, respectively. The Future Land Use Study Area is expected to experience similar growth patterns, with increasing population growth between today and 2030. Job Trends / Projections Between 1997 and 2007, data from the North Carolina Employment and Security Commission (NCESC) indicates that Mecklenburg County and Cabarrus County gained jobs at an annual rate of 2.3% and 3.3%, respectively. The NCESC also produces labor projections for the Workforce Development Boards (WDB) in North Carolina. The NCESC predicts a 1.8% annual increase in jobs between 2006 and 2016 in both Charlotte/Mecklenburg WDB (Mecklenburg County) and Centralina WDB (including Anson, Cabarrus, Iredell, Lincoln, Rowan, Stanly, and Union Counties). In order to determine annual job growth rates for the Future Land Use Study Area, employment projections were distributed to three municipalities in the Future Land Use Study Area using 2000 US Census data and professional judgment. For example, the NCESC total projected employment growth for Mecklenburg County was distributed to each of the member municipalities based upon their percentage share of the total County population in 2000. The City of Charlotte and Town of Huntersville comprised approximately 78% and 3.5%, respectively, of the total 2000 population in Mecklenburg County. Consequently, the projected employment growth between 2006 and 2016 was distributed according to these percentages. The projected employment for each municipality was then distributed within the Future Land Use Study Area based on a review of existing transportation and land use plans, as well as professional judgment. This distribution assumed that WBS # 34410.1.24 STIP Project R -2248E 1-485 from NC 115 to 1-85 North in Mecklenburg County Indirect Screening and Land Use Scenario Assessment July 9, 2009 the Future Land Use Study Area contained approximately 3% of the City of Charlotte's employment base and 15% of the Town of Huntersville's employment base. The projected employment growth in Cabarrus County was distributed in a similar manner. Using 2000 US Census data, it was determined that Cabarrus County comprised approximately 20% of the total population within the 7 -county Centralina WDB. These jobs were then distributed to the each of the County's member municipalities based upon their percentage share of the population of Cabarrus County in 2000. Using this approach, 42% of the projected jobs within Cabarrus County were distributed to the City of Concord. Based on a review of existing and future land use, the project employment for City of Concord was then distributed to the Future Land Use Study Area. This distribution assumed that 10% of the Concord employment base was contained in the Future Land Use Study Area. Based on the methodology described above, it is estimated that the Future Land Use Study Area will experience an annual job increase of 1.8% between 2006 and 2016. Job projections past the year 2016 were not available at the time of this assessment. Municipal Utilities Sewer service within the Future Land Use Study Area is provided by Charlotte -Mecklenburg Utilities (CMU), City of Concord, and the Water and Sewer Authority of Cabarrus County (WSACC). In general, municipal sewer service is available in most of the Future Land Use Study Area. According to local officials, there are some pockets in the unincorporated portions of the Future Land Use Study Area that do not currently have sewer service. However, sewer service could be extended to these areas, if requested by individual homeowners and/or developers. WSACC is responsible maintenance and operation of trunk/interceptor sewer lines in Cabarrus County, as well as the Rocky River Regional Wastewater Treatment Plan (Rocky River WWTP). The City of Concord is responsible for the collector sewer system serving its retail and residential customers. Much of the sewerage generated in the Future Land Use Study Area is treated by the Rock River WWTP. Local officials indicate this facility has a current treatment capacity of 24 million gallons per day (MGD). On average, the plant receives approximately 16 MGD. The plant is permitted to treat approximately 32 MGD; however, achieving this capacity would require improvements to the Rocky River WWTP that are not currently included in the capital improvement program. According to Charlotte -Mecklenburg Utilities website 2, Charlotte -Mecklenburg Utilities has five wastewater treatment plants with a total treatment capacity of 123 MGD. On average, these treatment plants receive approximately 78 MGD for treatment. The Future Land Use Study Area is served by three wastewater treatment facilities: McDowell Creek WWTP, Mallard Creek WWTP, and Rocky River Regional WWTP. Water service within the Future Land Use Study Area is provided by Charlotte -Mecklenburg Utilities and the City of Concord. According to local officials, water service exists through much of the Future Land Use Study Area. There are some pockets that still are without municipal water service. However, water service could be extended to these outlying areas, if requested by individual homeowners and/or developers. The Charlotte -Mecklenburg Utilities website indicates that there are three water treatment plants with a total treatment capacity of 242 million gallons per day (MGD). The average daily water use is approximately 105 MGD. 2 htti)://www.charmeck.org/Departments/Utilities/About+Us/home.htm, accessed April 2009 WBS # 34410.1.24 10 STIP Project R -2248E 1-485 from NC 115 to 1-85 North in Mecklenburg County Indirect Screening and Land Use Scenario Assessment July 9, 2009 Notable Features Human Environment Based on NC One Map and NCDOT GIS data, Concord Regional Airport is located within the Future Land Use Study Area along Derita Road (SR 1445), approximately three miles north of the eastern project terminus. Concord Regional Airport is owned and operated by the City of Concord. Bradford Field Airport is also located within the Future Land Use Study Area. More specifically, this airport is located south of Huntersville-Concord Road and east of Asbury Chapel Road. Bradford Field Airport is privately owned and operated. NC One Map GIS information also indicates the presence of a private helipad near the southern boundary of the Future Land Use Study Area. Concord Mills Mall is also located in the Future Land Use Study Area. Concord Mills Mall contains over 200 stores and is the number one visitor attraction in the state of North Carolina3. According to NC One Map GIS data, there are eight schools in the Future Land Use Study Area. These schools are shown on Figure 2. • Cox Mill Elementary School • J.M. Alexander Middle School • North Mecklenburg High School • David Cox Road Elementary School • Mallard Creek Elementary School • Blythe Elementary School • Mallard Creek High School • Highland Creek Elementary School Based on field observations and input from local officials, there are four additional schools located or under construction in the Future Land Use Study Area. These schools are also shown on Figure 2: • Cox Road High School • Lake Norman Charter School Middle School • Lake Norman Charter School High School (under construction) • Countryside Community High School (Montessori School — Johnston -Oehler Campus; under construction) Based on NC One Map GIS data, Charlotte -Mecklenburg GIS data, existing aerial photography, and websites for both Huntersville Parks & Recreation Departmene and Charlotte -Mecklenburg Parks & Recreation Departments, the following recreational facilities are within the Future Land Use Study Area: • Alexandriana • Mallard Creek Community Park and Recreation Center • South Prong Clarke Creek Greenway (Proposed) • Davis Farm Property (Proposed) • Eastfield District Park (Proposed) • Ramah Creek Greenway (Proposed) • Clark's Creek Greenway NE (Partially complete) 3 www.visitnc.com, accessed May 2009 4 http://www.huntersville.org/parksrec 2.asp, accessed April 2009 5httD:HmaDS.co.mecklenbura.nc.us/website/Darkfacility/MaD.aSD?Actionl=ldentifv&Prkid=TRCK&x=308&v=1 36, accessed April 2009 WBS # 34410.1.24 11 V'F-/ STIP Project R -2248E 1-485 from NC 115 to 1-85 North in Mecklenburg County Indirect Screening and Land Use Scenario Assessment July 9, 2009 • Clark's Creek Tributary Greenway (Proposed) • Mallard Creek Greenway (Partially complete) • Huntersville Athletic Park • Hambright Soccer Fields • David B. Waymer Park & Recreation Center • David B. Waymer Aeromodeler Flying Field • Holbrook Park • Arts & Cultural Center • Tradition Golf Course • Highland Creek Golf Course • Skybrook Golf Club According to the North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources (NCDENR) and NC One Map GIS data, there is one hazardous disposal site in the Future Land Use Study Area — Florida Steel Corporation. Florida Steel Corporation is located approximately two miles south of the western project terminus on Lakeview Road at NC 115. According to NC One Map and the North Carolina State Historic Preservation Office, there are three structures and/or districts in the Future Land Use Study Area that are listed on the National Register of Historic Places. Croft Historic District is located on NC 115, approximately 1.5 miles south of the western project terminus. John F. Ewart Farm is located on the northern boundary of the Future Land Use Study area on Huntersville-Concord Road. Favoni is a National Register structure located within the Future Land Use Study Area on Derita Road (SR 1445). According to the GIS database, the Favoni structure was burned in 1990. According to NC One Map GIS data, there are eight structures in the Future Land Use Study Area that are listed on the Historic Study List. The following study list structures are located within'/2 mile of the proposed STIP Project R -2248E project corridor: • Wilson House and Farm • Edgewood Plantation Farm House • Oehler Log House Natural Environment STIP R -2248E is located within sub -basin (03-07-11) of the Yadkin Pee Dee River Basin and sub - basins (03-08-33; 03-08-34) of the Catawba River Basin. There is one Water Supply Watershed (Class IV) within the Future Land Use Study Area - the Mountain Island Lake Water Supply Watershed of the Catawba River Basin (see Figure 2). Within the Future Land Use Study Area, Rocky River and Clarke Creek are both listed on the North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources (NCDENR's) 2006 Final 303(d) List6. Rocky River and Clarke Creek are both shown in Figure 2. Clarke Creek is listed as having impaired biologic integrity from its source to Rocky River. The section of Rocky River from its source to the mouth of Reedy Creek is listed as having impaired biological integrity and violating standards for turbidity and fecal coliform. There are no High Quality Waters or Outstanding Resource Waters located within the Future Land Use Study Area for STIP Project R -2248E. 6 http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/tmdI/documents/303d Report.pdf, accessed April 2009 WBS # 34410.1.24 12 STIP Project R -2248E 1-485 from NC 115 to 1-85 North in Mecklenburg County Indirect Screening and Land Use Scenario Assessment July 9, 2009 According to GIS data from NC One Map, there are National Wetlands Inventory (NWI) wetlands scattered throughout the Future Land Use Study Area, as well as along Clark's Creek, Clarke Creek, and Rocky River. The North Carolina Natural Heritage Program was accessed to obtain a list of Federally -Protected Species and Natural Communities in the four USGS quadrangles encompassing the Future Land Use Study Area. The Carolina heelsplitter and Schweinitz's sunflower are designated as federally endangered species and are listed in two of the four quadrangles reviewed. GIS data from NC One Map indicates there are five designated Significant Natural Heritage Areas within the Future Land Use Study Area (see Figure 2). These areas include the Trails End Lane Post Upland, Bingham Road Hardpan Forest, the Ridge Road Hardpan Forest, Mallard Creek Sunflower Site, and the Clarke Creek Heron Rookery. According to information provided by the NCDOT Natural Environment Unit (NEU), concurrence is currently being requested from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service regarding two Schweinitz's sunflower populations that occur very close to the project. NCDOT NEU is evaluating these populations for consideration of indirect effects from the proposed project. Based on discussions between NCDOT, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, City of Charlotte, and Mecklenburg County, the following preliminary environmental commitments are currently being evaluated by NCDOT NEU: 1. Retain the property where the sunflowers grow. NCDOT has been in contact with Mecklenburg County to see if they would be interested in helping the City of Charlotte maintain this population of sunflowers once construction of STIP Project R -2248E is complete. If no agreement can be reached to have the City of Charlotte and/or Mecklenburg County maintain the population of sunflowers, NCDOT may decide to retain the portion of the access road where the sunflowers are located in order to maintain the existing sunflowers. 2. Maintain the sunflowers with a mowing regime of no mowing between April 1 and November 15, and wintertime mowing at least every other year. 3. Post "Do Not Mow" signs at the sunflower locations once construction of STIP Project R - 2248E is complete. 4. Contact the two homeowners adjacent to the sunflowers to inform them of the mowing regime and the protected status of the sunflowers. 5. No ditching or changes in drainage in the vicinity of the sunflowers. 6. Use the NCDOT Roadside Environmental Unit's native seed mix will be used in the vicinity of the sunflowers. 7. Place orange fencing around the sunflower population for the duration of construction associated with STIP Project R -2248E. Development Regulations Transportation and land use decisions within the Future Land Use Study Area are guided by the following land use plans: Charlotte -Mecklenburg Planning Department • Mecklenburg -Union Metropolitan Planning Organization 2030 Long Range Transportation Plan • 2015 Plan — Planning Our Future • Centers, Corridors and Wedges Growth Framework • 1-485 Interchange Analysis • General Development Policies WBS # 34410.1.24 13 STIP Project R -2248E 1-485 from NC 115 to 1-85 North in Mecklenburg County Indirect Screening and Land Use Scenario Assessment July 9, 2009 • Northeast District Adopted Future Land Use Map • Northeast Area Plan • Northlake Area Plan • Prosperity Church Road Villages — Land Use and Urban Design Plan for the Prosperity Church Road and 1-485 Interchange Charlotte -Mecklenburg Storm Water Services • Mecklenburg County Phase II Stormwater Management Program Plan • City of Charlotte Phase I Stormwater Management Program Plan Charlotte Area Transit System • 2030 Transit Corridor System Plan • North Transit Corridor Proposed Station Locations • Transit Station Area Principles • Eastfield Station Area Plan* • Charlotte Region — Transit Station Area Joint Development Principles and Policy Guidelines • North Mecklenburg Towns — Transit Station Area Joint Development Principles and Policy Guidelines *Developed as part of the Northlake Area Plan Mecklenburg County Parks & Recreation Department • Comprehensive Parks and Recreation Master Plan Town of Huntersville • Huntersville Community Plan • Downtown Master Plan • East Huntersville Area Development Plan • NC 73 Transportation / Land Use Corridor Plan • Gilead Road / US 21 Small Area Plan • Mountain Island Lake Watershed Protection Guidelines City of Concord • City of Concord 2015 Land Use Plan • Concord Regional Airport Master Plan (currently being updated) Cabarrus County • Cabarrus-Rowan Metropolitan Planning Organization 2030 Long Range Transportation Plan • Cabarrus County Draft Northwest Area Future Land Use Map Ordinances/Regulations The City of Charlotte, Town of Huntersville, and Mecklenburg County have several regulations/ordinances that affect development within the Future Land Use Area. A listing of these regulations/ordinances is included below: • Floodplain Ordinance* • Post -Construction Storm Water Ordinance* • Surface Water Improvement & Management (SWIM) Ordinance* • Cabarrus County Zoning Ordinance • Cabarrus County Subdivision Ordinance WBS # 34410.1.24 14 STIP Project R -2248E 1-485 from NC 115 to 1-85 North in Mecklenburg County Indirect Screening and Land Use Scenario Assessment July 9, 2009 • Cabarrus County Flood Damage Prevention Ordinance • City of Charlotte Storm Water Pollution Ordinance • City of Charlotte Zoning Ordinance • City of Charlotte Water Supply Watershed Restrictions • City of Charlotte Sediment & Soil Erosion Control Ordinance • City of Charlotte Land Development Standards Manual • Mountain Island Lake Watershed Protection Guidelines • City of Concord Code of Ordinances • City of Concord Development Ordinance • City of Concord Technical Standards for Site Development • Mecklenburg County Surface Water Pollution Ordinance • Mecklenburg County Sediment & Soil Erosion Control Ordinance • Mountain Island Lake Watershed Protection Guidelines • North Carolina Division of Water Quality Water Supply Watershed Regulations • North Carolina Division of Land Resources — Sediment and Erosion Control Act • Town of Huntersville Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance • Town of Huntersville Zoning Ordinance • Town of Huntersville Low Impact Development Ordinance • Town of Huntersville Subdivision Ordinance • Town of Huntersville Water Quality Design Manual * Separate ordinances for City of Charlotte, Town of Huntersville, and Mecklenburg County Federal Regulations In 1972, the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) was established under the authority of the Clean Water Act. Phase I of the NPDES stormwater program was established in 1990. It requires NPDES permit coverage for large or medium municipalities with populations of 100,000 or more. In North Carolina, there are six Phase I communities, including the City of Charlotte. The Phase II program extends permit coverage to smaller (< 100,000 population) communities and public entities that own or operate a municipal separate storm sewer system (MS4) by requiring them to apply for and obtain a NPDES permit for stormwater discharge. Federal law requires communities and public entities that own or operate a MS4, and that meet either of the following two conditions, to obtain a NPDES Phase II stormwater permit: 1) The MS4 is located in an urbanized area as determined by the latest Decennial Census of the Bureau of the Census. If the MS4 is not located entirely within an urbanized area, only the portion that is within the urbanized area is regulated. 2) The community or public entity is designated by the NPDES permitting authority. In the state of North Carolina, the NPDES permitting authority is the Environmental Management Commission (EMC). The City of Charlotte has developed a Draft Phase I Stormwater Management Plan. Mecklenburg County, Cabarrus County, Town of Huntersville, and City of Concord are designated as Phase II communities by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). In coordination with other designated Phase II communities, Mecklenburg County and the Town of Huntersville have adopted a Phase II Stormwater Management Plan. The City of Concord's stormwater management plan and policies are a component of City's Technical Standards for Site Development Manual. Available Land There are approximately 28,373 acres of land within the Future Land Use Study Area. Approximately 1,888 acres are covered by the road network and the existing rights-of-way WBS # 34410.1.24 15 STIP Project R -2248E 1-485 from NC 115 to 1-85 North in Mecklenburg County Indirect Screening and Land Use Scenario Assessment July 9, 2009 associated with the roads. Approximately 1,408 acres are covered by streams, creeks, surface water, and buffers established through local ordinances. Other lands assumed protected from development activities (i.e., parks, greenways, Significant Natural Heritage Areas, National Register districts) totaled approximately 1,477 acres. However, because many of the registered Significant Natural Heritage Areas remain under private ownership, it should be noted that protection of land contained within them is not guaranteed. It was assumed that any parcel without a structure, with a structure valued at less than $10,000, or with a structure on land in excess of ten acres is available for development. After subtracting these areas from the total land area, it is estimated that approximately 17,164 acres in the Future Land Use Study Area (or 60%) could be considered available for development. It should be noted that the existing tax parcel data used for this GIS analysis contains a unique entry for each recorded parcel owner. As a result, the acreage for parcels having multiple owners could have been counted more than once during the GIS analysis. Market for Development Current Development Pressures Local officials indicate that residential and non-residential growth is occurring throughout the Future Land Use Study Area. Over the last several months, this area has experienced a slight decline in the overall growth rate due to generally poor economic conditions and outlook. However, there are several approved developments ready for construction once the economy improves. Local officials from the Charlotte -Mecklenburg Planning Commission and the Town of Huntersville indicate that most new residential growth in the Future Land Use Study Area has been in the areas between the major transportation corridors such as 1-77, 1-85 and the Charlotte Area Transit Systems' planned North Transit Corridor (North Corridor). The preferred mode of the North Corridor is commuter rail and the general concept is to utilize the existing Norfolk Southern Rail line. Commercial, retail, office, and business park growth is occurring in planned centers such as the Prosperity Church Road mixed-use center and the North Transit Corridor station areas. Additionally, major mixed-use developments such as Christenbury Corners and Bryton have been approved. Christenbury Corners is located at the intersection of Concord Mills Boulevard/Christenbury Parkway and Derita Road. Bryton is a transit oriented development located north of the 1-485/NC 115 interchange. According to local officials, Bryton will have approximately one million square feet of commercial space, one million square feet of office space, and approximately 2500 residential units. Industrial and commercial development is occurring in the area surrounding the Concord Regional Airport and the Derita Road corridor. Although supportive of residential growth, local officials indicate that a primary goal is to attract commercial and industrial growth in planned nodes and activity centers. Development Market Assumptions Current development trends are expected to continue or increase into the planning horizon of 2030. There is expected to be a modest increase in jobs between 2006 and 2016. Population, on the other hand, is expected to increase more rapidly between now and 2030. These factors suggest that demand for residential and non-residential land will stay the same or increase. Indirect and Cumulative Effects Screening Methodology and Matrix An Indirect and Cumulative Land Use Effects Screening Matrix (see Table 1) was developed which qualitatively assesses factors that influence land development decisions. It rates the influence of each category from high concern for indirect effects to less concern for indirect effects. The measures used to rate the effects from a high concern for indirect effects potential to less concern for indirect effects potential are also supported by documentation. Each characteristic is assessed individually and the results of the table are looked at comprehensively WBS # 34410.1.24 16 STIP Project R -2248E 1-485 from NC 115 to 1-85 North in Mecklenburg County Indirect Screening and Land Use Scenario Assessment July 9, 2009 to determine the indirect and cumulative effects potential of the proposed project. The scope of the project and change in accessibility categories are given extra -weight to determine if future growth in the area is related to the project modifications. Further examination of potential indirect and cumulative effects will be undertaken on projects that have more categories noted as moderate to high concern. Table 1. Indirect and Cumulative Land Use Effects Screening Matrix Screening Matrix Results for STIP Project R -2248E Based on the information gathered, the categories in the screening tool indicate a moderate to high concern for indirect and cumulative effects. Despite comprehensive growth management policies, the scope of project, change in accessibility, forecasted population growth, availability of land, availability of water/sewer service, and market for development suggest further evaluation of indirect and cumulative effects is warranted. Consequently, a Land Use Scenario Assessment was completed. The purpose of this assessment was to evaluate whether more substantial indirect and cumulative effects are anticipated, both with and without the project, and to note where these effects are most probable. Probable Development Scenarios In order to qualitatively assess the type of development that could occur in the Future Land Use Study Area both with and without the project, a number of sub -areas are examined in this assessment. Development pressures and regulations, including proposed future land use, proximity to transportation infrastructure, availability of water and sewer infrastructure, and proximity to population and employment centers will generally influence pattern and intensity of development. The sub -areas examined in this report, called probable development areas, are based on observations from the site visit, input from local planners, and review of existing local planning documents, tax parcel data, and professional judgment. Predictions of the type of development that might occur between now and 2030, both with and without the project, are discussed for each sub -area. The predictions of land use change in the sub -areas will be the basis for determining whether impacts to notable features, including waterways, are likely in the overall Build and No -Build Scenarios. Probable Development Areas Three sub -areas within the Future Land Use Study Area are identified as probable development areas (see Figure 3). These areas are consistent with local development trends and/or specifically identified on future development plans of the municipalities or counties. WBS # 34410.1.24 17 Forecasted Forecasted Notable Scope of Change in Population Employment Available Water/Sewer Market for Public Policy Environment Result Rating Project Accessibility Growth Growth Land Availability Development al Features Major New > 10 minute > 3% annual Substantial # of 5000+ Acres of All services Development Less stringent; Targeted or More Location travel time population New Jobs Land existing / activity abundant no growth Threatened Concern savings growth Expected available management Resource 1 X X X X X Likely Indirect x Scenano Assessment x X 1 X Less Concern Very Limited No travel time No population No new Jobs or Limited Land No service Development More stringent; Features Scope savings growth or Job Loses Avaialble available now or activity lacking growth incorporated in decline in future management local protection Screening Matrix Results for STIP Project R -2248E Based on the information gathered, the categories in the screening tool indicate a moderate to high concern for indirect and cumulative effects. Despite comprehensive growth management policies, the scope of project, change in accessibility, forecasted population growth, availability of land, availability of water/sewer service, and market for development suggest further evaluation of indirect and cumulative effects is warranted. Consequently, a Land Use Scenario Assessment was completed. The purpose of this assessment was to evaluate whether more substantial indirect and cumulative effects are anticipated, both with and without the project, and to note where these effects are most probable. Probable Development Scenarios In order to qualitatively assess the type of development that could occur in the Future Land Use Study Area both with and without the project, a number of sub -areas are examined in this assessment. Development pressures and regulations, including proposed future land use, proximity to transportation infrastructure, availability of water and sewer infrastructure, and proximity to population and employment centers will generally influence pattern and intensity of development. The sub -areas examined in this report, called probable development areas, are based on observations from the site visit, input from local planners, and review of existing local planning documents, tax parcel data, and professional judgment. Predictions of the type of development that might occur between now and 2030, both with and without the project, are discussed for each sub -area. The predictions of land use change in the sub -areas will be the basis for determining whether impacts to notable features, including waterways, are likely in the overall Build and No -Build Scenarios. Probable Development Areas Three sub -areas within the Future Land Use Study Area are identified as probable development areas (see Figure 3). These areas are consistent with local development trends and/or specifically identified on future development plans of the municipalities or counties. WBS # 34410.1.24 17 Lake Norman ems, i Coddle Cre 73 f e , nt U ersville Concord R =` d \ _ d'29 �\ r Huntersville ni -� - �f Concord 21 01 a ?� 5•e`a Rd 29 �a R�d9e l `\ a Con cord - Mliis i C. pppppOC4Cp0OO4jOL.L / ��-"_pOOCp'J� a l 3 � Mountain Island Lake I �av\d Cox Nd)a, q d Cre � \ • �,- 115 �a�� c, �v o Harrisburg n v Z �� p � K • v o Charlotte 4 29 < \ o oliva Railroad o North Car � h - as - - - y \\ Or ,10.5' 1 1.5 2 2:5 3 Miles LEGEND: RailroadMAP Harrisburg SOURCES: STIP Project Stream or Creek Figure 3 North Carolina OneMap, http://www.nconemap.com North Carolina Department of Transportation, http://www.ncdot.org ❑pppC7pt R-2248 E Huntersville ® FLUSA Water Body Probable Development ----� County Area 1 Probable Development Areas �– Interstate L� Boundary US Route Probable Development Area 2 STIP Project R -2248E Charlotte Mecklenburg County —❑— State Route 0 Concord Probable Development Mecklenburg County Local Road Area 3 July 2009 STIP Project R -2248E 1-485 from NC 115 to 1-85 North in Mecklenburg County Indirect Screening and Land Use Scenario Assessment July 9, 2009 1.) NC 115 Interchange Area This sub -area is centered on the existing/proposed interchange with NC 115 and encompasses approximately 1,905 acres of land on both sides of 1-485 (see Figure 3). Existing land use in the area of the proposed NC 115 interchange is a mixture of single- family residential, institutional, commercial and industrial. The Northeast District Adopted Future Land Use Map and the Northlake Area Plan both designated the land west of NC 115 for office/business park, industrial, and retail use. East of NC 115 and south of Eastfield Road, most of the land is generally planned for dense (approximately 5 to 8 units per acre) residential development. The area surrounding the proposed NC 115 interchange is also part of the planned North Corridor Transit Station Area. A station area plan is currently being developed by the City of Charlotte for this area. According to the Charlotte Area Transit System (CATS) Transit Station Area Principles, more intense uses are encouraged within approximately '/z -mile of proposed transit stations to support pedestrian -oriented activity. The highest density uses would be concentrated closest to the planned transit station and would transition to lower density development adjacent to existing single-family neighborhoods. Several transit -oriented developments (TODs) with more intense land uses, such as the Bryton development, have already been approved by local land use authorities. Bryton will be located immediately north of the NC 115 interchange. The North Mecklenburg Industrial Park, which has also been approved for development, will be located immediately north of Bryton. No -Build: Commercial, business park, industrial, and residential development in this sub- area is likely because of the available acreage and proximity to 1-77, and the planned North Corridor Transit Station. These developments would be likely be commercial, dense residential, or mixed-use in nature to provide the density needed to encourage pedestrian -oriented activity and to support the planned transit system. Build: The construction of STIP Project R -2248E is the final new location segment for the planned 1-485 urban loop around the City of Charlotte. As an eight -lane freeway, it will provide enhanced regional mobility and improved access at planned interchanges such as NC 115. However, the construction of the 1-485/1-85 interchange is a separate project. Therefore, eastbound 1-485 traffic will still need to utilize the local transportation network to access 1-85. The increased mobility and access provided by STIP Project R -2248E could accelerate planned commercial, industrial, and residential growth in the area surrounding the NC 115 interchange. However, these types of developments are already occurring in this sub -area in anticipation of the planned future transit service, and the current proximity to 1-77. 2.) Prosperity Church Road Interchange Area This sub -area is centered on the proposed interchange with Prosperity Church Road and encompasses approximately 549 acres of land on both sides of 1-485 (see Figure 3). Existing land use in the area of the Prosperity Church Road interchange is a mixture of commercial, retail with out -parcels and single-family residential. Based on existing aerial photography, there is a mobile home park on the west side of Prosperity Church Road north of the proposed interchange. According to the Northeast District Adopted Future Land Use Map, the mobile home park as well as other land surrounding the interchange is planned for more intense land uses. Additionally, the Prosperity Church Road Villages Plan (Villages Plan) recommended implementation of the village concept in the area of the planned interchange with 1-485. The primary purpose of this recommendation was to avoid segregated development that typically occurs at highway interchange. More specifically, the Plan recommended two villages, one on each side of 1-485 with a mixture of retail, office and residential uses oriented to public streets and squares. This planned WBS # 34410.1.24 18 STIP Project R -2248E 1-485 from NC 115 to 1-85 North in Mecklenburg County Indirect Screening and Land Use Scenario Assessment July 9, 2009 development pattern was meant to place the tallest buildings and most intense traffic generating mixed commercial uses adjacent, or in close proximity, to 1-485. The Village Plan recommended transitioning to multi -family (up to 30 units acre) two to three blocks from 1-485, transitioning to further lower density townhouses (up to 20 units per acre), then to single family detached (6-8 units per acre) at the village edges. According to the Village Plan, the planned village boundary extends up to approximately 0.5 miles from the interchange on all sides. No -Build: Residential and commercial development would likely continue along Prosperity Church Road in the No -Build scenario. Between Ridge Road and Dearmon Road, much of this development would be mixed-use in nature. The majority of land outside these areas would likely continue to develop as single-family residential. Under the No -Build scenario, it is possible that the density of future land use could decrease with the absence of the proposed interchange. This would likely result in less dense uses that could encompass a larger land area. Build: Local officials suggested that some of the planned development in this sub -area is reliant on the construction of STIP Project R -2248E. Consequently, dense mixed-use development consisting of office, retail, industrial, single-family and multi -family residential uses is anticipated adjacent to the project corridor. It is anticipated that this growth would occur within the planned village area which centers on Prosperity Church Road and extends basically from Eastfield Road on the north to just south of Dearmon Road. The character and intensity of this development would transition to less dense residential use as the distance from the interchanges increases. This pattern of development in the area of the proposed interchange is consistent with the Villages Plan. 3.) Mallard Creek Road/Odell School Road Interchange Area This sub -area is located north and southeast of the proposed interchange with Mallard Creek Road/Odell School Road and encompasses approximately 1,477 acres (see Figure 3). The majority of the land southwest of the proposed interchange is already developed or is owned by Mecklenburg County (including Mallard Creek Community Park and the Tradition Golf Club) and was therefore not considered developable area. Local planners also indicated the presence of a minority population outside the probable development area along Polk and White Road. Existing land use in the area of the interchange is single-family residential and institutional with some park/open space. The Northeast District Adopted Future Land Use map indicates that land uses north of the interchange will transition to higher density residential and mixed-use. Southeast of the interchange, the future land use map indicates that the density of the residential uses will increase. No -Build: Residential development would likely continue in this sub -area under the No - Build scenario. In the absence of the interchange, it is possible that the office space component of the planned mixed-use developments could decrease. Additionally, residential density may also decrease. However, the sub -area still has relatively easy access to the Interstate (1-85) and the major arterials such as NC 24. Build: The construction of STIP Project R -2248E could attract more dense mixed-use developments to the northern half of this sub -area. These developments would be comprised of single-family and multi -family residential, office, and retail uses. Dense residential development (8-12 units per acre) would also likely occur on major feeder roads such as Ridge Road, Beard Road, Odell School Road, and Mallard Creek Road. Local officials indicated that some planned development in this sub -area was reliant upon the construction of the freeway. The southeast portion of this sub -area would remain WBS # 34410.1.24 19 STIP Project R -2248E 1-485 from NC 115 to 1-85 North in Mecklenburg County Indirect Screening and Land Use Scenario Assessment July 9, 2009 single-family in character, but the density of the development would likely increase to approximately 4-6 units per acre. Land Use Scenario Assessment Methodology and Matrix The categories listed on the Scenario Assessment Matrix (Figure 4) have been shown to have a direct relationship to future quality of life and effects to resources. The measures used to rate the effects from a high concern for quality of life and effects to resources to less concern for quality of life and effects to resources are also supported by documentation and case studies. Each characteristic is assessed individually, for the Build Scenario and the No -Build Scenario. The results of the screening matrix in Table 2 represent a comprehensive determination as to whether greater quality of life or effects to resources are expected to result from the project. In general, the more the Build Scenario and the No -Build Scenario diverge, the greater the potential for future effects to quality of life or resources. Table 2 — Land Use Scenario Analysis Matrix Scenario Assessment Results Based on a close examination of the probable development areas, the construction of STIP Project R -2248E could result in land use change. These changes would likely result in a mixture of uses with increased densities at nodes such as interchanges and planned transit stations. Construction of the project may accelerate planned growth within each of the three sub -areas examined. However, land use patterns are not expected to be markedly different between the No -Build and Build scenarios. The construction of STIP Project R -2248E is not expected to influence regional population growth. Due to its proximity to the Charlotte and the surrounding municipalities, the accessibility of the Interstate system, and presence of regional attractions (such as Concord Mills Mall, Northlake Mall, and Lowe's Motor Speedway, growth is already occurring within the Future Land Use Study Area. Given this situation, no difference in future population is anticipated between the No -Build and Build scenarios. The comprehensive and extensive land use controls and development regulations in-place throughout the entire Future Land Use Study suggest that constructing the roadway will not increase pressure for residential, commercial, and industrial in non-regulated areas. There are a number of adopted ordinances to help mitigate the water quality effects due to increased impervious surface coverage, increased stormwater runoff, and a greater change for non -point source pollution. WBS # 34410.1.24 20 Future Shift of Pressure I Demand for Regional Population Pressure for Land Pressure for Land Typically Higher Growth to the Growth Development Outside Development Outside Planned / Managed Rating Impact Development Area Regulated Areas Planned Areas Development Pattern Landuse and Impacts A Large Number of Acres A Large Number of Acres Commercial / Industrial in the Probable Growth in the Probable Growth Land Development and Development with Large Strong Attraction of Areas are Outside a Areas are Outside a Strip or Sprawling Storm Water Management More Parkinq Lots Likely Develo ment in this Area Re ulated Area Planned Area Development Likelv Goals Not Set 1Concern I Build Scenario Build Scenario No -Build Scenario No -Build Scenario No -Build Scanario Build Scenario No -Build Scenario Build Scenario Build Scenario Build Scenario No -Build Scenario No -Build Scenario Less Concern Commercial Development No Population Shift Likely All Probable Growth Areas All Probable Growth Areas Likely to Support and Growth Areas are and / or Large Residential in a Regulated Area in a Regulated Area Clustered Development Consistent with Land Developments Not Likely Development and Storm Water Management Goals Scenario Assessment Results Based on a close examination of the probable development areas, the construction of STIP Project R -2248E could result in land use change. These changes would likely result in a mixture of uses with increased densities at nodes such as interchanges and planned transit stations. Construction of the project may accelerate planned growth within each of the three sub -areas examined. However, land use patterns are not expected to be markedly different between the No -Build and Build scenarios. The construction of STIP Project R -2248E is not expected to influence regional population growth. Due to its proximity to the Charlotte and the surrounding municipalities, the accessibility of the Interstate system, and presence of regional attractions (such as Concord Mills Mall, Northlake Mall, and Lowe's Motor Speedway, growth is already occurring within the Future Land Use Study Area. Given this situation, no difference in future population is anticipated between the No -Build and Build scenarios. The comprehensive and extensive land use controls and development regulations in-place throughout the entire Future Land Use Study suggest that constructing the roadway will not increase pressure for residential, commercial, and industrial in non-regulated areas. There are a number of adopted ordinances to help mitigate the water quality effects due to increased impervious surface coverage, increased stormwater runoff, and a greater change for non -point source pollution. WBS # 34410.1.24 20 STIP Project R -2248E 1-485 from NC 115 to 1-85 North in Mecklenburg County Indirect Screening and Land Use Scenario Assessment July 9, 2009 All land within the Future Land Use Study Area falls under the jurisdiction of the City of Charlotte, Town of Huntersville, Mecklenburg County, Cabarrus County and the City of Concord. There are numerous land use and transportation plans in-place to guide land use decisions. Therefore, construction of the roadway is not expected to increase the pressure for development outside of planned development areas. Construction of STIP Project R -2248E may slightly influence development patterns in the Future Land Use Study Area. However, the resulting patterns are more consistent with local land use plans. This is particularly true at the proposed interchanges where mixed-use developments are anticipated if the project is constructed. The clustered development in these areas will likely have a lower ecological footprint per unit than anticipated No -Build development patterns. Constructing the roadway is not expected to change the ability of local jurisdictions to implement and meet development and stormwater management goals. Additionally, the Build Scenario is consistent with adopted transportation and land use plans. Stream buffers, Water Supply Watershed regulations, local stormwater regulations, and numerous ordinances will limit the potential indirect effects to water quality in the Future Land Use Study Area. Indirect Assessment Summary The construction of 1-485 between NC 115 and 1-85 (excluding the 1-485/1-85 interchange) will enable drivers to travel across northern Charlotte more efficiently by providing motorists with an alternative route to NC 24 (Harris Boulevard). The construction of STIP Project R -2248E will also provide through traffic to bypass the congested sections of 1-77 and 1-85 adjacent to uptown Charlotte. Residential, commercial, and industrial development is expected to continue in the Future Land Use Study Area with or without the project. Following recent trends, residential units will likely be constructed throughout the Future Land Use Study Area. Increased residential unit density, as well as commercial and industrial development is anticipated in the area of the three proposed interchanges. Construction of the project is expected to have minimal, if any, effect on the overall number of residential units or commercial/industrial facility square footage of these developments. The Future Land Use Study Area has stringent development regulations, particularly with regard to the preservation of water quality. A portion of the Future Land Use Study Area is contained within the protected area of the Mountain Island Lake Class IV Water Supply Watershed. This area includes density limits and limitations on percentage of impervious surface. As discussed in the Development Regulations section of this assessment, several other regulations exist within the Future Land Use Study Area to limit water quality effects of development. These include provisions for floodplain development, zoning, post -construction stormwater runoff, stream buffers, and zoning. In addition to these regulatory mechanisms, there are several land use and transportation plans and policies helping to organize and control growth within the Future Land Use Study Area. All land within the Future Land Use Study Area falls under the jurisdiction of the City of Charlotte, Town of Huntersville, Mecklenburg County, Cabarrus County, or the City of Concord. Although the construction of STIP Project R -2248E has the potential to somewhat influence development within the Future Land Use Study Area, the Build scenario is not expected to result in increased effects to quality of life or resources. The water quality concerns associated with future development in both the No -Build and Build scenarios will be greatly mitigated by regulations covering watershed protection, stream buffers, and stormwater management regulations. WBS # 34410.1.24 21 STIP Project R -2248E 1-485 from NC 115 to 1-85 North in Mecklenburg County Indirect Screening and Land Use Scenario Assessment July 9, 2009 Cumulative Effects Summary Due to the access and mobility provided by 1-77, 1-85 and completed sections of the Outer Loop (1-485), growth is occurring in the Future Land Use Study Area. However, this growth is consistent with adopted transportation and land use plans such as the City of Charlotte's Centers, Corridors, and Wedges Growth Framework and the Prosperity Church Road Villages Land Use and Urban Design Plan. The Charlotte Area Transit System (CATS) also has plans to construct two transit stations in the Future Land Use Study Area as part of its North Transit Corridor. As a result, transit -oriented development such as Bryton is currently underway in the planned transit station areas. As needed, municipal sewer and water service is being extended to accommodate this planned growth. Cumulatively, STIP Project R -2248E and other planned roadway improvements in the Future Land Use Study Area should enhance accessibility and improve travel time locally and regionally. The planned transportation and infrastructure improvements could make the area more attractive for potential development. STIP Project R -2248E is the final new location segment for the planned I-485 urban loop around the City of Charlotte. As an eight -lane freeway, it will provide enhanced regional mobility and improved access at proposed interchanges and major feeder roads. The increased mobility and access provided by STIP Project R -2248E could accelerate planned commercial, industrial, residential, and mixed-use growth in the Future Land Use Study Area. However, these types of developments are consistent with locally adopted land use plans and are anticipated with or without the construction of the project. As impervious surface becomes more prevalent from these planned developments, there is increased potential to harm aquatic resources from the increased stormwater runoff. However, stringent regulations and requirements associated with construction activities will serve to temper the effects to notable features as land use change continues in the Future Land Use Study Area. Conclusions and Next Steps Direct effects to natural environmental resources are avoided, minimized, mitigated, and/or enhanced and will be further evaluated by NCDOT NEU during project permitting. Detailed qualitative analysis of the probable development patterns in the Future Land Use Study Area suggests that STIP Project R -2248E will have little to no effect on future stormwater runoff or water quality in the watersheds encompassed by the project. The proposed project has the potential to influence timing and intensity of planned development within the Future Land Use Study Area. However, the effects to water quality as a result of this planned project will be tempered by existing land use controls and development regulations covering watershed protection, stream buffers, erosion and sedimentation control, and post -construction runoff. Given the minimal indirect effects of the project, any contribution of the project to cumulative effects resulting from current and planned development patterns should be minimal. For these reasons, potential indirect and cumulative effects to downstream water quality should be minimal. No additional ICE study is recommended. WBS # 34410.1.24 22 STIP Project R -2248E 1-485 from NC 115 to 1-85 North in Mecklenburg County Indirect Screening and Land Use Scenario Assessment July 9, 2009 Sources: Aerial photography from Google, www.google.com, accessed April 2009. Cabarrus Rowan Metropolitan Planning Organization, 2030 Long Range Transportation Plan Fiscally Constrained Project List, provided via e-mail, April 30, 2009. Charlotte -Mecklenburg GIS, accessed September 2007, April 2009. Charlotte -Mecklenburg Parks & Recreation Department, http://www.charmeck.org/Departments/Park+and+Rec/Home.htm, accessed April 2009. Charlotte -Mecklenburg Planning Department, http://www.charmeck.org/Departments/Planning/Home.htm, accessed April 2009. Charlotte -Mecklenburg Storm Water Services Department, http://www.charmeck.org/Departments/StormWater/Home.htm, accessed April 2009. Charlotte -Mecklenburg Utilities Department, http://www.charmeck.org/Departments/Utilities/Home.htm, accessed April 2009. City of Concord, http://www.ci.concord.nc.us, accessed April 2009. Mecklenburg -Union Metropolitan Planning Organization, Mecklenburg -Union Metropolitan Planning Organization 2030 Long Range Transportation Plan, http://www.mumpo.org/2030 LRTP.htm, accessed April 2009. North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources, http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/tmdl/General 303d.htm, 2006 Final 303(d) List of Impaired Waterbodies, accessed April 2009. North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources, www.ncnhp.org, Natural Heritage Program, accessed April 2009. North Carolina Department of Transportation, 2009-2015 State Transportation Improvement Program. North Carolina Department of Transportation, Project Development and Environmental Analysis Branch, Categorical Exclusion for 1-485 and Prosperity Church Road Interchange, May 2006. North Carolina Department of Transportation, Roadway Design Unit, Preliminary Roadway Design Plans, transferred via NCDOT File Transfer System, April 2009. North Carolina Employment Security Commission, www.ncesc.com, 1990, 2000, 2007 data and projections to 2016, accessed April 2009. North Carolina Office of State Budget and Management, www. osbm.state. ne.us, 2010-2030 projections, accessed April 2009. NC One Map, www.nconemap.com, accessed December 2007. North Carolina State Historic Preservation Office, www.hpo.dcr.state.nc.us, accessed April 2009. Town of Huntersville, http://www.huntersville.org/, accessed April 2009. United States Census Bureau, www.census.gov, 1990 and 2000 population data, accessed April 2009. WBS # 34410.1.24 23 Appendix — Local Planner Meeting Minutes HNTB Project: STIP Project R -2248E —1-485 from NC 115 to 1-85 North Subject: Meeting with Charlotte -Mecklenburg Planning Commission Meeting Date/Time: 4/23/09, 1:00 pm Meeting Location: Charlotte Mecklenburg Government Center 81h Floor Conference Room Present: Kathy Cornett Charlotte -Mecklenburg Northeast District Planner Adin McCann HNTB — Charlotte Paige Dixon HNTB — Charlotte Adin McCann began by providing a brief overview of the project. HNTB is working with the North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) in developing an Indirect and Cumulative Effects Screening Report and Land Use Scenario Analysis for State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) Project R -2248E. This project proposed to construct a new location freeway (1-485) between NC 115 and 1-85 North. The 1-485/1-85 interchange will be constructed as a separate project (STIP Project R-2123CE). HNTB provided Ms. Cornett with a Draft Future Land Use Study Area (FLUSA) map to use as a reference during the meeting. No schedules or project timelines were discussed. Other items discussed: Staff Background: • Ms. Cornett has been with the Charlotte -Mecklenburg Planning Commission for ten years and is very familiar with the Future Land Use Study Area. Relevant plans/ ordinances we are missing: • Ms. Cornett stated that when property is rezoned, even if it was inconsistent with the adopted land use policy, it amends the land use plan. Therefore, it becomes the adopted land use for that specific parcel. • The land use map in the City's website is updated regularly to reflect approved rezoning. • According to the concept Prosperity Church Road Villages Plan (Villages Plan), the non-residential and higher density residential development is planned in the area closest to the interchange. The residential density decreases as distance from the interchange increases. The least dense residential use in the Villages Plan is approximately 6-8 dwelling units per acre. This is more intensive than typical single-family development in Mecklenburg County. Development that has occurred in the area of the proposed interchange has mostly stayed consistent with the Villages Plan. This trend is expected to continue into the future. • Mr. McCann presented Ms. Cornett with a list of plans and ordinances that HNTB has obtained. • Ms. Cornett stated that the list of plans and ordinances seemed to cover most everything. She suggested it may be beneficial to obtain/review the basic rezoning process since most projects that are not done under current zoning are mostly conditionally rezoned. • Ms. Katrina Young is the zoning administrator. GIS Data: • It was recommended to contact Ms. Jan Whitesell with Charlotte -Mecklenburg GIS Department for any needed GIS data. Extraterritorial jurisdiction (ETJ) /Sphere of Influence: • The City of Charlotte regulates land in the ETJ. Eastfield Road is boundary for Town of Huntersville ETJ/Sphere of Influence. Page 1 of 4 FINAL Minutes of Charlotte -Mecklenburg Planning Commission Meeting — 04/23/09 (cont'd) STIP Project R -2248E Annexation/ Future Annexation Plans: • Generally, the amount of "rooftops" and population numbers drive the annexation process. • Mr. Jonathan Wells is a good contact in regards to annexation process. Current traffic patterns / congestion area: • Ms. Cornett suggested contacting Mr. Brian Horton (Charlotte Department of Transportation). • Mallard Creek Road / Odell School Road intersection was recently re -constructed. Proposed local transportation project • Ms. Cornett suggested contact Mr. Stuart Basham (MUMPO) to obtain more information on this subject. Mr. Basham has been working with the State on the realignment of Odell School Road / Ridge Road, as well as any other local connections are also being discussed. Local controversy associated with STIP Project R -2248E: • Ms. Cornett is not aware of any local controversy associated with the project. She mentioned that attendance was low at local meetings associated with the development of the Villages Plan. Growth in study area: • There were approximately 42 rezoning petitions in the late 1990s to early 2000s in the 1-85 / Mallard Creek Road area. Much of this was non-residential development that was not built. • Ms. Cornett has recently received phone calls regarding residential development in Homewood Acres, which is behind Mallard Woods where the proposed interchange will be constructed. • There has been residential (town homes) and non-residential (retail) growth around Prosperity Church Road near the proposed interchange. Ms. Cornett anticipates the next wave of residential development in this area would be single-family homes. • Ms. Cornett has not seen a lot of development along NC 24 (Harris Boulevard). Redevelopment • None. Characterization of resicential, commerical, and industrial market: • The markets have been slow and Charlotte -Mecklenburg is currently not filling alloted rezoning petitions. This trend first started in late summer / early fall 2008. Major employment centers / planned employer relocations: • University Research Park, located just north of NC 24 (Harris Boulevard) and west of 1-85, is a major employment center within the Future Land Use Study Area. • No planned employer relocations into or out of the Future Land Use Study Area. Water / sewer: • Charlotte -Mecklenburg Utilities provided water and sewer services to the majority of Mecklenburg County. A small portion of Mecklenburg County receives water and sewer services from Cabarrus County. • Ms. Cornett is unsure of any planned extension or upgrades to Charlotte-Mecklenburg's water and sewer systems. • In a subsequent telephone conversation, Ms. Cornett suggested contacting Mr. Andrew Brunnick with Charlotte -Mecklenburg Utilities for more information related to municipal water and sewer services. Local commitment to development: • The local commitment to development slightly favors pro -growth. Page 2 of 4 FINAL Minutes of Charlotte -Mecklenburg Planning Commission Meeting — 04/23/09 (cont'd) STIP Project R -2248E • Approximately 90% of plans are consistent with the land use plan. Many of the conditions placed upon approval of site plans are the result of negotiations. Major constraints to development in the area: • A constraint to development in the Future Land Use Study Area is the adopted policies. Development that is not consistent with these policies does not generally occur. • The area has good transportation access and good infrastructure and municipal services. Buffer regulations/ land use controls: • In addition to the SWIM buffers, Ms. Cornett suggested referencing Charlotte-Mecklenburg's Zoning Ordinance. Local runoff management programs / Phase 11 stormwater regulations: • Ms. Cornett suggested checking with Charlotte -Mecklenburg Storm Water Services on this subject Land protected from development: • None. Development moratoria /incentives: • No development moratoria. • No specific development incentives. However, opportunities, such as TIF districts, do exist. Voluntary agricultural districts: • None. FEMA buyout properties in study area: • None. Notable features: • Notable features include Mallard Creek Community Park, two greenways, Croft Historic District. The Alexander House may also be in the study area. The Johston-Oehler properties may also fall under this category. • Ms. Jan Whitesell should have access to GIS data containing notable features in the Future Land Use Study Area. • Ms. Cornett suggested reviewing Charlotte-Mecklenburg's Historic Landmarks Commission website. Low income, minority, or ethnic communities: • Homewood Acres is a minority subdivison located just south of the eastern project terminus. • Polk and White Road (south of Mallard Creek Community Park) is also a minority community. • LeGranger is located across the street from Mallard Creek Presbyterian Church and is a minority community. Projected annual employment growth rate of 1.8% per year between 2006 and 2016 in Mecklenburg County: • Ms. Cornett feels that the annual employment growth rate of 1.8% is reasonable for the Mecklenburg County portion of the Future Land Use Study Area. • Charlotte -Mecklenburg recently updated employment projections as part of the CATS Blue Line Extension study, but there projections are not at a level to release to the public yet. Page 3 of 4 FINAL Minutes of Charlotte -Mecklenburg Planning Commission Meeting — 04/23/09 (cont'd) STIP Project R -2248E Projected annual population growth rate of 4.5% in Mecklenburg County between 2010 and 2030: • Ms. Cornett feels that the annual population growth rate of 4.5% per year is reasonable for the Mecklenburg County portion of the Future Land Use Study Area. Anticipated affected land use in area due to STIP Project R -2248E: • Ms. Cornett anticipates that the proposed project will probably open up the area to development. This is particularly true in the area of the Mallard Creek Road interchange. • Ms. Cornett expects more residential land use around the proposed Mallard Creek Road interchange. • The land around the proposed Mallard Creek Road / 1-485 interchange (northwest quadrant) was rezoned about ten years ago to allow for approximately 100,000 square feet of retail development, 33,000 square feet of office, as well as residential development (approximately 12 dwelling units per acre). This development will have to undergo a site plan amendment (i.e., go back through rezoning process) because the approved site plan will not work with the proposed interchange design. • Most of the planned retail and town home development in the area of the proposed Prosperity Church Road interchange has already occurred. Ms. Cornett anticipates single-family and lower density residential development will likely occur next in the area. The foregoing constitutes our understanding of the matters discussed and the conclusions reached. If there are any questions, corrections, omissions, or additional comments please advice Adin McCann (HNTB) within five working days after receipt of these minutes. cc: Attendees Project File Page 4 of 4 XNTB Project: STIP Project R -2248E — 1-485 from NC 115 to 1-85 North Subject: Meeting with Cabarrus County Commerce Department Meeting Date/Time: 4/27/09, 3:00 pm Meeting Location: Cabarrus County Government Center 2nd Floor Conference Room Present: Jonathan Marshall Commerce Director Susie Morris Planning and Zoning Manager Adin McCann HNTB — Charlotte Paige Dixon HNTB — Charlotte Adin McCann began by providing a brief overview of the project. HNTB is working with the North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) in developing an Indirect and Cumulative Effects Screening Report and Land Use Scenario Analysis for State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) Project R -2248E. This project proposed to construct a new location freeway (1-485) between NC 115 and 1-85 North. The 1-485/1-85 interchange will be constructed as a separate project (STIP Project R-2123CE). HNTB provided Mr. Marshall and Ms. Morris a Draft Future Land Use Study Area (FLUSA) map to use as a reference during the meeting. No schedules or project timelines were discussed. Other items discussed: Staff Background: • Mr. Marshall has been working with Cabarrus County for twenty years and is very familiar with the project study area. • Ms. Morris has been working with Cabarrus County for five years and is also familiar with the project study area. Relevant plans/ ordinances we are missing: • Mr. Marshall and Mrs. Morris suggested that HNTB obtain Concord's 2015 Land Use Plan, the Western Area Plan, and the Prosperity Church Road Study. • The County has ordinances covering floodplains, subdivisions, and zoning. • Cabarrus County enforces all ordinances and regulations until an area is annexed. Local controversy associated with STIP R -2248E: • Mr. Marshall and Ms. Morris are not aware of any local controversy associated with this project Growth in study area / major developments under construction: • There is a new high school being constructed on Cox Mill Road. Redevelopment • Non-residential redevelopment (industrial, business park, office) is occurring all along Derita Road in the general area of the airport. Major employment centers /planned employer relocations: • The area around Concord Regional Airport is a major employment area and is also zoned for industrial use. • There are no planned employer relocations into or out of the Future Land Use Study Area. Page 1 of 3 FINAL Minutes of Cabarrus County Commerce Department Meeting — 04/27/09 (cont'd) STIP Project R -2248E Water / sewer: • Huntersville and Charlotte -Mecklenburg Utilities Department provide water and sewer service to the Skybrook subdivision. • The City of Concord's water and sewer services extend almost to the county line. Local commitment to development: • Mr. Marshall and Ms. Morris feel that the local commitment to development is best described as being somewhere between pro -growth and anti -growth. The primary focus of growth within the County is non- residential development. Action was taken towards this several years ago when Cabarrus County rezoned land for non-residential growth. Major constraints to development in the area: • A rock quarry located along Poplar Tent Road serves as a constraint to residential growth. • Clarke Creek has many wetlands associated with it which is also a constraint to development. There are over 200 acres of wetlands in total along the Creek. Cabarrus County owns approximately 35 acres of these wetlands. Local runoff management programs / Phase 11 stormwater regulations: • Cabarrus County is a designated Phase II community. Land protected from development: • Clarke Creek Heron Rookery is a significant natural heritage area in Cabarrus County located off of Cox Mill Road. This area is protected from development. Cabarrus County is interested in expanding this area. Consequently, if needed, the County would be amenable to working with NCDOT to identify opportunities for implementation of mitigation on the Rookery site. Development incentives: • There are development incentives for non-residential (industrial) developments. Voluntary agricultural districts: • There are no voluntary agricultural districts (VADs), enhanced voluntary agricultural districts (EVADs) inside of the Future Land Use Study Area. FEMA buyout properties in study area: • None in the Future Land Use Study Area. Notable features: • Clarke Creek Heron Rookery is a significant natural heritage area and is located off of Cox Mill Road. The Rookery is owned by Cabarrus County. • There is an existing school park at Cox Mill Elementary School, as well as a golf course located at Skybrook. Low income, minority, or ethnic communities: • Local planners indicated low income populations along Cox Mill Road, as well as on Moss Drive off Poplar Tent Road. Page 2 of 3 FINAL Minutes of Cabarrus County Commerce Department Meeting — 04/27/09 (cont'd) STIP Project R -2248E Employment annual growth rate of 1.8% per year between 2006 and 2016 in Mecklenburg County and the 7 - county Centralina Workforce Development Board (Anson County, Cabarrus County, Iredell County, Lincoln County, Rowan County, Stanly County, and Union County): • Mr. Marshall and Ms. Morris feel that it is difficult to comment on employment growth since the economy has changed a great deal over the past year. Additionally, the Phillip Morris Plant has announced that it will be closing one year earlier than intially expected. • The portion of Cabarrus County that is located within the Future Land Use Study Area is good in terms of jobs (retail), but not necessarily in terms of wages. Also, the area is above average in terms of jobs in comparison to the county. Annual population growth rate of 4.8% in Cabarrus County between 2010 and 2030: • The portion of Cabarrus County that is located within the Future Land Use Study Area is a high growth area compared to Cabarrus County as a whole. Also, there is still growth in the developing Christenbury Corners and Winding Walk (residential subdivision) areas. The Highland Creek subdivision is built -out. Anticipated affected land use in area due to STIP Project R -2248E: • Ms. Morris and Mr. Marshall stated that much of the area in Cabarrus County within the Future Land Use Study Area is either already built -out or committed; therefore, the project will not have much of an impact on the land use. • The land at the corner of Poplar Tent Road and Harris Road has been rezoned for office use. • The proposed project will not create new access to jobs in the area as access from 1-85 already exists. Additional comments: • The City of Concord has proposed widening Derita Road, which will enhance access to the outerbelt (1-485) and Concord Regional Airport. The Derita Road corridor is an area that is already extremely active in terms of development (office, industrial, business park). The foregoing constitutes our understanding of the matters discussed and the conclusions reached. If there are any questions, corrections, omissions, or additional comments please advice Adin McCann (HNTB) within five working days after receipt of these minutes. cc: Attendees Project File Page 3 of 3 XNTB Project: STIP Project R -2248E - 1-485 from NC 115 to 1-85 North Subject: Meeting City of Concord Development Services Dept. and Business & Neighborhood Services Department Meeting Date/Time: 4/27/09, 2:00 pm Meeting Location: Concord City Hall Annex Building 2"d Floor Conference Room Present: Jeff Young Business & Neighborhood Services, Director Boyd Stanley Development Services Department, Development Review Administrator Adin McCann HNTB — Charlotte Paige Dixon HNTB — Charlotte Adin McCann began by providing a brief overview of the project. HNTB is working with the North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) in developing an Indirect and Cumulative Effects Screening Report and Land Use Scenario Analysis for State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) Project R -2248E. This project proposed to construct a new location freeway (1-485) between NC 115 and 1-85 North. The 1-485/1-85 interchange will be constructed as a separate project (STIP Project R-2123CE). HNTB provided Mr. Young and Mr. Stanley a Draft Future Land Use Study Area (FLUSA) map to use as a reference during the meeting. No schedules or project timelines were discussed. Other items discussed: Staff Background: • Jeff Young has been with the City of Concord since 1985. Mr. Young also grew up in the area and is therefore very familiar with the Future Land Use Study Area. • Boyd Stanley is originally from Union County and has been with the City of Concord for about 1.5 years. Relevant plans/ ordinances we are missing: • HNTB presented City staff with a list of relevant plans and ordinances from the City of Concord that HNTB has collected for the Future Land Use Study Area. • City staff indicated that it may be helpful to also obtain the NC 73 Transportation and Land Use Plan, Carolina Thread Trail Plan (currently under development), and the Concord Development Ordinance. The Concord Regional Airport Master Plan currently being updated. The Aviation Director is Mr. Richard Lewis and the consultant contact is Mr. Brian Salyers with Talbert & Bright. • Cabarrus County Northwest Area Plan may also be a helpful reference. GIS Data: • Mr. David Whitley is the GIS contact for the City of Concord and Cabarrus County. Extraterritorial jurisdiction (ETJ) / Sphere of Influence: • Concord has a very small remaining ETJ on the east side. Concord's ETJ on its east side does not extend to the county line. Concord does not have ETJ on its west side. Annexation/ Future Annexation Plans: • The City of Concord receives volunteer annexation requests mainly due to water and sewer utility services being provided by the City. • The City Council can approve utility hook-up without annexation if the area requesting utilities/annexation is located too far away from emergency services (i.e., police and fire services). Page 1 of 4 FINAL Minutes of City of Concord Meeting — 04/27/09 (cont'd) STIP Project R -2248E • There has been interest in the possible annexation of land between Christenbury Corners and Christenbury Village. This area would likely be intended for future mixed-use development Proposed local transportation project: • Derita Road is planned to be widened to a four -lane divided section. The project is scheduled for construction in either 2011 or 2013. The City of Concord is partnering with NCDOT on the project. Change in traffic patterns following construction of project: • It is believed that traffic on Derita Road / Odell School Road will increase following the construction of 1-485. Local controversy associated with STIP R -2248E: • There is no known local controversy associated with the project. Growth in study area: • Christenbury Corners is a large development on all four quadrants of the Concord Mills Boulevard/Christenbury Parkway/Derita Road intersection, just past Concord Mills Mall. Development at Christenbury Corners has greatly slowed down. Each corner is planned to be "anchored" by a major retailer, but there is only a Lowe's there now. • The focus for growth in the Corcord area lies within the boundaries of 1-85, NC 73, and the Mecklenburg- Cabarrus county line. • Residential growth is occurring on Poplar Tent Road. Residential growth is also occurring northwest of Christenbury Parkway and Cox Mill Road (Christenbury Village: a master -planned community on approx. 255 acres). This subdivision is slowly developing. • Multi -family residential and commercial growth is occuring near Concord Mills Mall. • The City of Concord area surrounding the Concord Regional Airport is planned for industrial development. Redevelopment • There are pockets of lower income neighborhoods along Poplar Tent Road that were developed around the 1950's or 1960's. The septic tanks at these homes are beginning to fail and some have also requested municipal water service. The County is doing revitalization project work in this area. Characterization of residential, commerical, and industrial market: • All markets have been slow recently due to the economy. • The portion of Concord located inside the Future Land Use Study Area is experiencing high growth compared to the rest of the City. • The northeast corner of the Future Land Use Study Area has become a major focus area for higher -end homes, estate homes, and multi -family residential. Major employment centers / planned employer relocations: • The Concord Regional Airport and the surrounding area are designated as a major employment center. This area includes the West Winds development located across from the airport on the west side of Derita Road. A second business park development (approx. 60 acres) is also planned by the same developer on the east side of Derita Road. • Concord Mills Mall and the area along 1-85 between the interchanges at Exits 49 — 52 are also considered employment center(s). A few years ago, these areas contained over 10,000 jobs. • Carolina Tractor has purchased 55 acres of land and plan to relocate their corporate headquarters from US 21/Harris Boulevard to the southwestern corner of Poplar Tent Road and Derita Road. The development will also include space to lease to external parties. Mr. Kevin Franklin is the contact, as well as the CFO, of Carolina Tractor. Page 2 of 4 FINAL Minutes of City of Concord Meeting — 04/27/09 (cont'd) STIP Project R -2248E Water / sewer: • The City of Concord provides water and sewer services. • There is an annexation agreement between Concord and Charlotte, as well as Concord and Huntersville. This agreement provides some provisions for providing temporary utility service within each other's territory until it is annexed by the other jurisdiction. Concord's City Clerk, Ms. Kim Deason, can provide the annexation agreements, if needed. • Wholesale sewer service is provided by Water and Sewer Service Authority of Cabarrus County (WSACC). WSACC partnered with Charlotte -Mecklenburg Utilities Department (CMUD) to build the Rocky River outfall. In essence, Charlotte-Mecklenburg's need to provide sewer service in northeast Mecklenburg County precipitated a joint agreement. Concord staff indicated that sewer service was available in the City of Concord and Cabarrus County portions of the Future Land Use Study Area. • Concord staff were not aware of any capacity issues with the municipal sewer and water system. Local commitment to development: • The local commitment to development can generally be described as mostly pro -growth for the area of Concord located inside the Future Land Use Study Area. The northwest area of the City did become a focus of investment because of so much development activity. City is also supportive of environmental and natural preservation projects such as the Carolina Thread Trail. • The City of Concord is generally pro -growth, but has adopted and enforced high standards in terms of site and facility design. • In this particular area, it is uncommon for a variance or exception to be granted to a development. However, given the current economy, the local government may choose to do so for economic growth / job development reasons. Major constraints to development in the area: • Constraints to development in the area include wetlands, floodplains, and growing traffic levels. • The City of Concord is coordinating with Charlotte Area Transit Systems (CATS) to commission a feasibility study to evaluate further extension of the Northeast Rapid Transit Corridor. This feasibility study will likely not start until approximately 2012. Buffer regulations/ land use controls: • The airport overlay district limits development. This, as well as other land use controls, is contained in the Development Ordinances. Local runoff management programs / Phase 11 stormwater regulations: • The City of Concord is a Phase II municipality. Land protected from development: • City staff did not think the Carolina Thread Trail planning was far enough along to allow for protection of lands. • City staff thought there might be a Clarke Creek preservation area. However, this area would probably be located in Mecklenburg County and would need to be confirmed with Mecklenburg County staff. Development moratoria / incentives: • There are incentives for industrial and office development in Concord. Voluntary agricultural districts: • There are no known voluntary agricultural districts (VADs) or enhanced voluntary agricultural districts (EVADs) within the Future Land Use Study Area in Concord. Page 3 of 4 FINAL Minutes of City of Concord Meeting — 04/27/09 (cont'd) STIP Project R -2248E FEMA buyout properties in study area: • None in the area. Notable features: Besides greenways, there are no known notable features within the Future Land Use Study Area in Concord. City staff stated that the Carolina Heelsplitter did not impact the development of Concord Regional Airport. Low income, minority, or ethnic communities: • There are a few pockets of low income neighborhoods along Poplar Tent Road. Projected annual employment growth rate of approximately 1.8% per year between 2006 and 2016 in the 7 - County Centralina Workforce Development Board (Anson County, Cabarrus County, Iredell County, Lincoln County, Rowan County, Stanly County, and Union County): • The four Charlotte -are MPOs are partners on the development of the Metrolina Regional Travel Demand Model. The City contracts this transportation planning work out to a consultant. • Mr. Phil Conrad with Mobility Solutions is the contact for MPO socioeconomic data. Mr. Conrad's telephone number is (704) 795-7528. Projected annual population growth rate of approximately 4.8% per year in Cabarrus County between 2010 and 2030: • Mr. Phil Conrad with Mobility Solutions is the contact for socioeconomic data. • Mr. David Whitley, the GIS contact for the City of Concord, may also have population projections. Anticipated affected land use in area due to STIP Project R -2258E: • City staff felt that just the prospect of STIP Project R -2248E affects the land use in the area, especially since it is the last "leg" of the outer loop. City staff felt there would be less of an impact on Concord since I- 85 already exists. • City staff felt the project may accelerate the development of any remaining residentially zoned land. However, City was unsure if any such land still existed in the Future Land Use Study Area. This area is already developing quickly due to the market for development, the accessibility to 1-85 and availability of sewer/water service. Additional comments: • City staff added that they would like to see an effort made to time the completion of the 1-85/1-485 interchange with the completion of STIP Project R -2248E. The foregoing constitutes our understanding of the matters discussed and the conclusions reached. If there are any questions, corrections, omissions, or additional comments please advice Adin McCann (HNTB) within five working days after receipt of these minutes. cc: Attendees Project File Page 4 of 4 XNTB Project: STIP Project R -2248E — 1-485 from NC 115 to 1-85 North Subject: Meeting with Town of Huntersville Meeting Date/Time: 4/27/09, 10:00 am Meeting Location: Huntersville Town Hall Conference Room Present: Bill Coxe Jack Simoneau Zach Gordon Adin McCann Paige Dixon Transportation Planner Planning Director Principal Planner HNTB — Charlotte HNTB — Charlotte Adin McCann began by providing a brief overview of the project. HNTB is working with the North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) in developing an Indirect and Cumulative Effects Screening Report and Land Use Scenario Analysis for State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) Project R -2248E. This project proposed to construct a new location freeway (1-485) between NC 115 and 1-85 North. The 1-485/1-85 interchange will be constructed as a separate project (STIP Project R-2123CE). HNTB provided the Town with a Draft Future Land Use Study Area (FLUSA) map to use as a reference during the meeting. No schedules or project timelines were discussed. Other items discussed: Staff Background: Bill Coxe was born in Charlotte and became Mecklenburg County's Transportation Planner from 1978 through 1998. Bill has participated in and reviewed environmental documents for all segments of the Charlotte Outer Loop. Bill was also part of the 1-485 interchange analysis completed by the MPO. Bill has been with the Town of Huntersville since 1998 and is very familiar with the Future Land Use Study Area. Jack Simoneau has been with the Town of Huntersville Planning Department since 2001 and is familiar with the Future Land Use Study Area. Zach Gordon has been with the Town of Huntersville since 2005 and is also familiar with the Future Land Use Study Area. Relevant plans/ ordinances we are missing: • HNTB presented the Town with a list of plans and ordinances that have been obtained. • Town staff suggested obtaining/referencing the US 21/Gilead Road Small Area Plan, the Greenway/Bikeway/Trail Masterplan (2008), Downtown Huntersville Plan, the Draft EIS for the North Rapid Transit Corridor (which is still under development), Exit 23 Small Area Plan, and the North Rapid Transit Corridor Market Analysis (currently being finalized). The market analysis study will be utilized to modify the trip generation component for the rapid transit corridors contained in the Metrolina Regional Travel Demand Model. The contact for the market analysis is Ms. Kathy Cornett with Charlotte -Mecklenburg Planning Commission. • The Town also suggested referencing the Prosperity Church Road Extension Corridor Study. • The Town has also partnered with the three north Mecklenburg municipalities to complete a broad assessment of land use and potential development along the North Corridor. The purpose was to develop a common language for density and land use along transit corridor. The final product was a series of maps. Page 1 of 5 FINAL Minutes of Town of Huntersville Meeting — 04/27/09 (cont'd) STIP Project R -2248E GIS Data: • Mr. Brian Richards is the GIS contact for the Town of Huntersville. The Town has a Major Features Map on their website which may be beneficial as a reference. Thoroughfares shown in red on the Approved Development & Major Features Map are identified, but no analysis has bee completed to define their alignment. Thoroughfares shown in black have had higher level of environmental analysis. These projects have had a natural resources screening, historic resources screening, and public involvement. Therefore, the Town has a greater level of certainty with regard to their alignment. Extraterritorial jurisdiction (ETJ) /Sphere of Influence: • Huntersville's ETJ begins on the north side of Eastfield Road. There are no holes or gaps between Huntersville and Charlotte's ETJ. Annexation / Future Annexation Plans: • The Town of Huntersville would like to bring everything in their Sphere of Influence into the Town limits. The Town Board explored legislative annexation to accomplish this task. However, there was some opposition at the public hearing meeting which was primarily attributed to the timing of the annexation process. Consequently, the Town Board later decided not to pursue the legislative annexation on its east side. • The Town completes satellite annexations at the request of the development. Forced annexations occur if a development meets certain urban criteria such as density / units per acre. • There is a general expectation and understanding between local elected officials and developers that, as the Town Board approves developments, the developer will petition for satellite annexation. • There is a police protection surcharge for non -incorporated areas and police response time in these areas tends to be very high. This helps to motivate developers to petition for annexation into the Town. Current traffic patterns / problem areas: • NC 115 is also very congested near the 1-485 interchange and around North Mecklenburg High School, Blythe Elementary School, and Alexander Middle School. The congestion problem is exacerbated by the three schools. Over the last three or four years, each of those school were the largest (enrollment) in North Carolina within their classification. • Road improvements in this area are being completed under a synthetic TIF associated with the Bryton development. This will include improving NC 115, part of Alexanderana Road, and Hambright Road. • Eastfield Road is very congested, especially at the intersections of NC 115, Alexanderana Road, Browne Road, Asbury Chapel Road, Highland Creek Parkway, and Prosperity Church Road. In general, Eastfield Road requires widening to alleviate this congestion. According to the MUMPO 2030 LRTP, the widening of Eastfield Road is a 2030 horizon project. • Poplar Tent Road is also very congested. Proposed local transportation projects: • Part of planned realignment of Browne Road and Asbury Chapel Road was constructed within the apartment complex developed on the south side of Eastfield Road. The realignment work was part of the NC Moving Ahead projects, but was never completed. This work should be completed in next two or three years. • The Town of Huntersville feels that it will be necessary for Everett Keith Road to be realigned once STIP Project R -2248E is constructed in order to provide a north -south thoroughfare that bypasses the interchange and provides local access. • The Town does not believe the current NCDOT design of the realigned Eastfield Road/Alexanderana Road bridges will have sufficient horizontal clearance to accommodate the required laneage to serve anticipated future traffic volumes on this facility. Page 2 of 5 FINAL Minutes of Town of Huntersville Meeting — 04/27/09 (cont'd) STIP Project R -2248E • As part of the North Mecklenburg Industrial Park, funding will be provided to bridge Verhoff over NC 115 and the railroad. Change in traffic patterns following construction of project: • Some traffic may split off of Eastfield Road onto Prosperity Church Road to access 1-485. This may relieve some traffic congestion on Eastfield Road between Prosperity Church Road and NC 115. However, this reduction will probably be offset by localized traffic trying to access planned new developments along Eastfield Road. Local controversy associated with STIP Project R -2248E: • There is no known local controversy associated with the project. Growth in study area: • Bryton is a Transit -Oriented Development (TOD) development to be located on NC 115 across from North Mecklenburg High School. This development is approximately 400 acres and is planned to include 2,500 residential units, 1 million square feet of office space, and 1 million square feet of retail. • The Town believes that the Bryton development exists primarily in anticipation of the Outer Loop and the North Transit Corridor. • There is a planned industrial park (North Mecklenburg Industrial Park) on the east side of NC 115 north of North Mecklenburg High School. The plans for this development can be found on the Town of Huntersville website under current planning cases. The industrial park would be approximately 330 acres. There is no formal adopted master plan for the industrial park. • Olmsted is a single-family planned development in the northwest quadrant of Eastfield Road/Prosperity Church Road. Plans for the Olmstead development can be found on the Town of Huntersville website. • Huntersville Village is a recently approved retail center (approximately 120,000 square feet) just east of the Olmstead subdivision on Eastfield Road. This approval followed Charlotte's approval for a shopping center on the opposite corner of Prosperity Church Road and Eastfield Road. • In general, development density decreases as you move further east and west from 1-77, NC 115 and US 21. Redevelopment: • The East Huntersville Area Plan identified a number of areas for residential and office redevelopment/infill. Other than what is discussed in the East Huntersville Area Plan, there is no other redevelopment taking place. Characterization of residential, commercial, and industrial market: • The Town of Huntersville feels its markets are strong, primarily due to its proximity to 1-77, 1-485, and the rail line. In 2006, Huntersville peaked at approximately 1,000 single-family residential building permits in the corporate limits. In 2008, building permits were down to approximately 420 building permits. Currently in 2009, Huntersville is in the single digits for building permits during the first four months of the year. Even though there is a decline in building permits, the Town feels that the markets are still strong because there are more than 4,000 entitled / approved lots in Huntersville. Major employment centers / planned employer relocations: • Bryton will be a major employment center within the Future Land Use Study Area. • North Mecklenburg Industrial Park is anticipated to be a large employment center also. • From a regional perspective, the Town is also interested to see how the Kannapolis biotech campus develops and its influence on NC 73 as a transportation linkage. Page 3 of 5 FINAL Minutes of Town of Huntersville Meeting — 04/27/09 (cont'd) STIP Project R -2248E Water / sewer: • There are no known capacity issues in the Rocky River Basin. • Sewer extensions are planned to Bryton and North Mecklenburg Industrial Park. • Huntersville water and sewer services are provided by Charlotte -Mecklenburg Utilities Department. Local commitment to development: • Huntersville is committed to pro -growth, but in a controlled manner. • According to data compiled by the Town, 2000 US Census indicated Town population was approximately 24,000. In January 2009, the Town estimated the population at approximately 44,500 within the corporate limits. The ETJ is estimated to add approximately 3,000 persons. • The political climate was described as "strained" due to basic philosophical splits among elected officials. • Huntersville adheres pretty closely to their land use plans, zoning ordinance and design standards. Some exceptions are made on certain design standards, but these do not typically influence or change the character of the development. • Huntersville does not allow privates streets. There are no gated communities and all apartments and store fronts must front a public street. Major constraints to development in the area: • The topography of Huntersville limits the intensity of development north of Eastfield Road and east of NC 115. • Huntersville has an Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance (APFO) which constrains development. • The Town of Huntersville has a requirement for Traffic Impact Assessments and has adopted Level of Service (LOS) standards at intersections. A Traffic Impact Assessment (TIA) is required when a new subdivision or development is proposed. The Town utilizes the Intersection Capacity Utilization LOS methodology for the TIA analyses. Local runoff management programs / Phase 11 stormwater regulations: • Huntersville is a Phase II municipality. Land protected from development: • A Major Features Map is available on the Town of Huntersville website, and anything in green (i.e., parks) on the map is protected from development. Development moratoria /incentives: • There are development incentives for industrial development in Huntersville, such as gifted land. • Tax breaks for developments are negotiable. Voluntary agricultural districts: • There are no voluntary agricultural districts within the Future Land Use Study Area in Huntersville. Low income, minority, or ethnic communities: • The Torrence -Lytle area (which is also known as East Town Community and Potts Town) is a predominantly African American community and is located on Holbrooks Road off of NC 115. • There are some pockets of low income housing located along Asbury Chapel Road north of Olmstead. Projected annual employment growth rate of 1.8% per year between 2006 and 2016 in Mecklenburg County: • Huntersville is currently approximately 72% residential and 28% non-residential. • In general, the Town feels that the published State employment numbers are reasonable for the portion of Huntersville within the Future Land Use Study Area. • The Town of Huntersville suggested using the socioeconomic data from the Metrolina Travel Demand Model as supplemental information for comparison to the published State data. Page 4 of 5 FINAL Minutes of Town of Huntersville Meeting — 04/27/09 (cont'd) STIP Project R -2248E Projected annual population growth rate of 4.5% per year in Mecklenburg County between 2010 and 2030: • The Town estimates a build -out population range of approximately 70,000 to 90,000. • The land area within the Town's ETJ is approximately 64 square miles. The land area in the Town's current corporate limits is slightly less than 40 acres. • The Town of Huntersville has developed their own population data trends and projections. The Town projects that the population will grow at a rate of 3.9% from 2010 to 2011 and 4.6% from 2011 to 2012. • In comparison, the population projections published by the North Carolina Office of State Budget and Management (NCOSBM) and the Town of Huntersville are very similar. • The Town of Huntersville suggested using the socioeconomic data from the Metrolina Travel Demand Model as supplemental information for comparison to the published State data. Anticipated effects on land use in study area due to STIP Project R -2248E: • The Town feels that the anticipation of STIP Project R -2248E has already affected land use in the Future Land Use Study Area. Once it is built, the Town anticipates it will affect land use even further. • The Town suggested contacting Mr. Jerry Northway who is the economic development coordinator for the Lake Norman Economic Development Commission for further discussion on this subject. The foregoing constitutes our understanding of the matters discussed and the conclusions reached. If there are any questions, corrections, omissions, or additional comments please advice Adin McCann (HNTB) within five working days after receipt of these minutes. cc: Attendees Project File Page 5 of 5 APPENDIX B Figure 1: Location Map Figure 2: Project Study Map Figure 3: Soils Map Figure 4: USGS Topo Map Figure 5: JD Map �i j Jy f - d ' 1 ' f Y Y ter" e z_ ;r i F. Interstate Prosperity Ridge Road ;� '` - • /+ Y 77 Eastfield Road PROJECT LOCATION E r I - lit t =w Statesville Road Ridge Road, . ,+' • d t y e 0. T. F +k r , y. ' e-' mak' �� - - '�Y . • - ; ��. '.esa REFERENCE: USGS 7.5' QUADRANGLE: DERITA,ti,_ NORTH CAROLINA - — LEGEND FIGURE 1 PROJECT LOCATION PROJECT LOCATION MAP PROSPERITY RIDGE ROAD CONNECTION PROJECT gal consuIta- nts CHARLOTTE MECKLENBURG STORMWATER SERVICES MECKLENBURG COUNTY, 0 2,500 5,000 10,000 DRAWN BY: RGJ DATE: 11/29/2011 Nf)RTH CARni INA Feet CHECKED: APPROVED: dy loam --' Arosper/ty V ``- dew O r �vd0e P ath L� Mecklenburg fine sandy loam 0 0 0 Rom�1 _ s Prosperity Ridge Road Eastfield Road PROJECT LOCATION - zw �. _ FOld Ridge Road =` t ', , �� - '�:- 4- �._ --- �+ _ • *�} -�_�-" � �. ''� '�� -' ~''rte wt�#i: _ a ° e i _ " L REFERENCE: USGS 7.5'; °,4 `• _ ,. ' '� QUADRANGLE: DERITA, NORTH CAROLINA x LEGEND FIGURE 4 � PROJECT LOCATION USGS TOPO MAP PROSPERITY RIDGE ROAD CONNECTION PROJECT gal consuIta- nts CHARLOTTE MECKLENBURG STORMWATER SERVICES MECKLENBURG COUNTY, 0 1,000 2,000 4,000 DRAWN BY: RGJ DATE: 11/29/2011 Nf)RTH C ARni INA Feet CHECKED: APPROVED: Wetland 2 - 0.01 \\Ir Cottage pak APPENDIX C Agency Correspondence r� Ecosystem PROGRAM December 2, 2013 Isaac Hinson City of Charlotte 600 E. 4t` Street Charlotte, NC 28202 Expiration of Acceptance: June 2, 2014 Project: Prosperity Ridge Road Connection Project County: Mecklenburg The purpose of this letter is to notify you that the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) is willing to accept payment for compensatory mitigation for impacts associated with the above referenced project as indicated in the table below. Please note that this decision does not assure that participation in the NCEEP will be approved by the permit issuing agencies as mitigation for project impacts. It is the responsibility of the applicant to contact these agencies to determine if payment to the NCEEP will be approved. You must also comply with all other state, federal or local government permits, regulations or authorizations associated with the proposed activity including SL 2009-337: An Act to Promote the Use of Compensatory Mitigation Banks as amended by S.L. 2011-343. This acceptance is valid for six months from the date of this letter and is not transferable. If we have not received a copy of the issued 404 Permit/401 Certification/CAMA permit within this time frame, this acceptance will expire. It is the applicant's responsibility to send copies of the permits to NCEEP. Once NCEEP receives a copy of the pen-nit(s) an invoice will be issued based on the required mitigation in that permit and payment must be made prior to conducting the authorized work. The amount of the In - Lieu Fee to be paid to NCEEP by an applicant is calculated based upon the Fee Schedule and policies listed at www.nceep.net. Based on the information supplied by you in your request to use the NCEEP, the impacts that may require compensatory mitigation are summarized in the following table. The amount of mitigation required and assigned to NCEEP for this impact is determined by permitting agencies and may exceed the impact amounts shown below. Impact River Basin CU Location Stream (feet) Wetlands (acres) Buffer I Buffer II (Sq. Ft.) (Sq. Ft.) Cold Cool Warm Riparian--F—Non-Riparian Coastal Marsh Yadkin 03040105 0 0 420 0.50 0 0 0 0 Upon receipt of payment, EEP will take responsibility for providing the compensatory mitigation. The mitigation will be performed in accordance with the N.C. Department of Environment and Natural Resources' Ecosystem Enhancement Program In -Lieu Fee Instrument dated July 28, 2010. Thank you for your interest in the NCEEP. If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact Kelly Williams at (919) 707-8915. Sincerely, Q Q Ja . B Stanfill Asset Management Supervisor cc: Karen Higgins, NCDWR Wetlands/401 Unit Steve Kichefski, USAGE -Asheville Jennifer Burdette, NCDWR- Wetlands/401 Unit Tony Nardo, agent File AMt7orj;1G9... E ... Prot" Oar .fti t& NCDENR North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program, 1652 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1652 / 919-707-8976 / www.nceep.net Beverly Eaves Perdue Charles Wakild, P. E. Dee Freeman Governor Director Secretary January 23, 2012 CERTIFIED MAIL 7009 2250 0004 3265 6674 RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED Mr. Isaac Hinson, PWS City of Charlotte 600 East Fourth Street Charlotte, NC 28202 SUBJECT: Return of Water Quality Certification Application, Prosperity Ridge Road Connection Project, City of • - Mecklenburg County,No.12-0007 : Dear -'Mr. Hinson: On January 3, 2012, the NC Division of Water Quality (NCDWQ) received your application dated December 19, 2011. On January 19, 2012, NCDWQ received notification from the US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) that your application was considered "incomplete" and "withdrawn". For this reason, NCDWQ hereby considers your Water Quality Certification application returned. Once you have redesigned your project to address the problems and/or inadequacies with your application to satisfy the USACE, you will need to reapply for NCDWQ approval. This includes submitting a complete application package with the appropriate fee. Please be aware that you have no authorization under Section 401 of the Clean Water Act for this activity and any work done within waters of the State would be a violation of North Carolina General Statutes and Administrative Code. Please call Polly Lespinasse at (704) 235-2190 if you have any questions or concerns. Sincerely, Robert B. Krebs, Regional Office Supervisor Surface Water Protection cc: Liz Hair, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Asheville Regulatory Field Office Sonia Carrillo, DWQ Transportation Permitting Unit File Copy Mooresville Regional Office Location: 610 East Center Ave,, Suite 301 Mooresville, NC 28115 Phone: (704) 663-1699 \ Fax: (704) 663-6040 \ Customer Service: 1-877-623-6748 Internet: http://portal.ncdenr.org/web/wq An Equal Opportunity 1 Affirmative Action Employer g :J tjI �m 1 XI 1; ARMY ;RPS OF ENGINEER Wilmington District 151 Patton Avenue, Room 208 Asheville, NC 28801-5006 Action Id. 2012-00058 County Mecklenburg,_ U.S.G.S. Quad Derita F;,[ t e"' r, -1 ri 11,; 1 Property Owner/Authorized Agent: The City of Charlotte Attn: Mr. Isaac J: Hinson, PWS Address: 600 East Fourth Street Charlotte, NC 28202 0 Location/Description of Proposed Activity: The proposed project is located within waters of the U.S. along Ridge Road, to the north of the future I-485 new location roadway (R-2248 E), in Mecklenburg County, North Carolina. 35.373302 N and -80.779864 W Type of Permit Applied For (check one): IP ( ) 1®1 O GP ( ) Applicable law: Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (X); Section 10, Rivers and Harbor Act ( ) NOTIFICATIONYOUR APPLICATION/PRECONSTRUCTION CANNOT, INFORMATION RECEIVED (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY): Your application/pre-construction notification form has not been completed and/or signed. (see remarks) Under the conditions of Nationwide Permit # , you are required to submit an aquatic resource mitigation plan. The required plan is either insufficient or has not been included with your notification (see remarks). Your application/pre-construction notification did not include information describing measures you have implemented to avoid and minimize losses of Waters of the United States. Your submitted project plans or maps were insufficient, too large, or not legible (see remarks) Your application/pre-construction notification did not include a delineation of affected special aquatic sites, including wetlands, vegetated shallows, and riffle and pool complexes as required. You must submit a copy of your application to the NC Wildlife Resources Commission (WRC) since your proposed work is in a designated trout water county (see remarks section below for the address of your WRC representative) Other (see remarks below) 1) The application states that the purpose of the proposed project is to connect two gaps in Prosperity Ridge Road and Ridge Road in the northeast quadrant of the Prosperity Village Subdivision. The application shows only one proposed road crossing and a gap in between the existing Prosperity Ridge Road and the existing subdivision road which was constructed as a stub -out in both directions. The entire proposed road alignment and any anticipated impacts to jurisdictional waters of the U.S. from the existing Prosperity Ridge Road to Ridge Road should be accounted for as one single and complete project. Additionally, this project is directly associated with the re -alignment of Prosperity Ridge Road in order to connect with the future new location I-485 (TIP R-2248 E) project. For our review purposes, the entire alignment of the proposed Prosperity Ridge Road to the I-485 connection is considered to be one project and will be evaluated as such. Page 2 of the application package states that the proposed connection is necessary to accommodate additional travel from the future I-485 interchange as an `integral part of the roadway system following the completion of I-485'. A portion of the proposed project"was included in the study area for the Federal Categorical Exclusion, dated June 13, 2006 and prepared by Federal Highways Administration for the Prosperity Church Road Interchange Study as a part of the I-485 project. Additional jurisdictional waters of the U.S. were identified in the proposed project study area. 2) Avoidance and Minimization: The application also states that the specific road alignment is necessary to avoid an adjacent structure and to tie into the proposed residential subdivision entrance on the other side of Ridge Road. Based on available information it appears that this section of the Prosperity Village subdivision is currently empty lots and no structures are visible on aerial photography which would dictate the current proposed alignment. Additionally, the Prosperity Village subdivision is connected to Ridge Road via Prosperity View Drive. The 1990 Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) between the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the Department of the Army establishes a mitigation sequencing process. Please be advised that Mitigation is a 3 -step process: Step L Avoid- Adverse impacts to aquatic resources are to be avoided and no discharge shall be permitted if there is a practicable alternative which has less impact. Step 2. Minimize- If impacts cannot be avoided, then all appropriate and practicable steps to minimize adverse impacts must be taken. Step 3. Compensation- Appropriate and practicable compensatory mitigation is required for unavoidable adverse impacts which remain after completing Steps 1 and 2. 3) The proposed compensatory mitigation plan is insufficient: The applicant proposes to mitigate for unavoidable impacts to 0.161 acres of jurisdictional wetlands and 226 linear feet of stream channel at, a 1:1 ratio with no rationale supporting the proposed 1:1 ratio. In accordance with the April 2003 Interagency Stream Mitigation Guidelines developed for use in the Wilmington District (District) provide guidance on acceptable mitigation ratios depending on the quality of the proposed impacted stream channel and type of mitigation provided. According to the Guidelines, basic compensatory mitigation for unavoidable impacts to a good quality stream is 2:1. 4) The proposed project may not be eligible for Department of the Army Authorization under the Nationwide Permitting Program and an Individual Section 404 permit may be required. 5) A portion of the City of Charlotte's Prosperity Ridge Road relocation project was previously incorporated within the I-485 TIP Project No. R-2248, which includes the Prosperity Church Road Interchange (which includes the future Prosperity Ridge Road, Loganville Drive, and the future re- located Prosperity Church Road). Your request is indicative that NCDOT has removed or segmented this portion of the project. In doing so, the Prosperity Ridge Road/Prosperity View Drive component, as proposed, now lacks a logical terminus. Logical termini for project development are defined as (1) rational end points for a transportation improvement, and (2) rational end points for a review of the environmental impacts. The environmental impact review frequently covers a broader geographic area than the strict limits of the transportation improvements. In the past, the most common termini have been points of major traffic generation, especially intersecting roadways. This is due to the fact that in most cases traffic generators determine the size and type of facility being proposed. Terminating this section of Prosperity Ridge Road at Ridge Road does not meet this standard. The Corps requires that related improvements within a transportation facility be evaluated as one project, rather than selecting termini based on what is programmed as short range improvements. Construction may then be "staged," or programmed for shorter sections or discrete construction elements as funding permits. Based on the discussion above, your application is being withdrawn. Please provide the above requested information at your convenience. Thank you for your attention to this matter. Should you have any questions or need additional information, please contact me at (828) 271-7980 extension 225. Date: January 17, 2012 Corps Regulatory Official: Liz HI `e Telephone No.: (828) 271-7980 x225 �-Jcy Copy Furnished: NC DWQ Mooresville Regional Office; 610 East Center Ave., Suite 301 Mooresville, NC 28115 North Carolina Department of Cultural Resources State Historic Preservation Office Ramona M. Bartos, Administrator Beverly Eaves Perdue, Governor Linda A. Carlisle, Secretary Jeffrey J. Crow, Deputy Secretary Office of Archives and History Division of Historical Resources David Brook, Director December 15, 2011 Ron Johnson GAI Consultants Re: Prosperity Ridge Road Connection Project, Charlotte, Mecklenburg County, ER 11-2318 Dear Mr. Johnson: Thank you for your email of December 2, 2011, concerning the above project. We have conducted a review of the project and are aware of no historic resources which would be affected by the project. Therefore, we have no comment on the project as proposed. The above comments are made pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act and the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation's Regulations for Compliance with Section 106 codified at 36 CFR Part 800. Thank you for your cooperation and consideration. If you have questions concerning the above comment, please contact Renee Gledhill -Earley, environmental review coordinator, at 919-807-6579. In all future communication concerning this project, please cite the above -referenced tracking number. Sincerely, (1��dLUAQL%- �"eRamona M. Bartos Location: 109 East Jones Street, Raleigh NC 27601 Mailing Address: 4617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh NC 27699-4617 Telephone/Fax: (919) 807-6570/807-6599 A A Via& NCDENR North Caroline Department of Environment and Natural Resources Office of Conservation. Planning, & Community Affairs Beverly Eaves Pardue, Governof Linda Pearsall, Director 1 ecember 7, 2011 Mr. lion G. Johnson GAI Consultants G 1€ 0 Fairview Road, Suite 616 Charlotte, NSC 25210 Subject Prosperity Ridge Road Connection Project; Charlotte, Mecklenburg County Dear Mr, Johnson: Cee Freeman, retary The Natural Heritage Program has no record .cfi rare species, significant natural communities, significant natural heritace areas, or conservatiDn/managed areas at the project site nor within 0.7 -mile of the project area. Although our maps do not show records of such natural heritage elements in the project area, it does not necessarily mean that they are not present. It may simply mean that the area has not been surveyed. The use of Natural Heritage Program data should not be substituted for actual field surveys, particularly if the project area contains suitable habitat for rare species, significant natural communities, or prionty natural areas. You may wish to check the Natural Heritage Program database website at�A-wwr.ncnhp.org for a listing of rare plants and animals and significant natural communities in the county and on the quad map. Our Prem also has a roe�v website that allows users toobtain information on element occurrences and significant natural heritage areas within two miles of given location. dirt} ';`nhpweb.enr.state.nc.us publielvirtual_�vorkroom pktml>. The user name is "guest" and the password is your e-mail address (see instructions on lag -in screen). You may, want to click "Help" for more information. Please do not hesitate to contact me at 919-707-8603 if you have questions or need further 'information. Sincerely, Harry E. Le rand, Jr., Zoologist Natural Heritage Progmm 1501 Mail Service center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1601 Pf one: 919-7154195 � FAX: 919-715-30160 Internet: www.aneNCNaturally.org Ari Equal Opportunity 3 Affi malive Action E-riploye� — 51)° Recycled ti 10% Post Consumer Paper One NofthCarolina Naturally APPENDIX D 1. Wetland Determination Data Forms 2. Stream Assessment Forms 3. USACE Approved Jurisdictional Determination Form WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Project/Site: Prosperity Ridge Road Connection Project City/County: Mecklenburg Sampling Date: 10/31/2011 Applicant/Owner: Charlotte -Mecklenburg Stormwater Services, Isaac Hinson State: NC Sampling Point: DP1 Investigator(s): Ron Johnson, PWS Section, Township, Range: N/A Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): floodplain Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope (%): 2 Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P Lat: 35.373211 Long: -80.779375 Datum: NAD 83 Soil Map Unit Name: Helena sandy loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes NWI classification: PEM Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes `� No (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes `� No Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No Is the Sampled Area Hydric Soil Present? Yes ✓ No within a Wetland? Yes No Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ✓ No Remarks: Wetland 1 HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required) Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) _ Surface Soil Cracks (136) Surface Water (Al) _ True Aquatic Plants (1314) _ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138) High Water Table (A2) _ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl) ✓ Drainage Patterns (1310) Saturation (A3) _ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) _ Moss Trim Lines (1316) Water Marks (131) _ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) _ Dry -Season Water Table (C2) Sediment Deposits (132) _ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) ✓ Crayfish Burrows (C8) Drift Deposits (133) _ Thin Muck Surface (C7) _ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Algal Mat or Crust (134) _ Other (Explain in Remarks) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) Iron Deposits (135) Geomorphic Position (D2) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137) _ Shallow Aquitard (D3) Water -Stained Leaves (B9) _ Microtopographic Relief (D4) Aquatic Fauna (1313) ✓ FAC -Neutral Test (D5) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth (inches): 0-12 Water Table Present? Yes No Depth (inches): 0 Saturation Present? Yes No Depth (inches): to surface Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ✓ No includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Interim Version VEGETATION (Four Strata) — Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: DP1 Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.) US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Interim Version Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet: Tree Stratum (Plot size: ) % Cover Species? Status Number of Dominant Species 1. That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 2 (A) 2. Total Number of Dominant 3. Species Across All Strata: 2 (B) 4. Percent of Dominant Species 5. That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100 (A/B) 6. Prevalence Index worksheet: 7 8 Total % Cover of: Multiply by: = Total Cover OBL species x 1 = Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 30 ) FACW species x 2 = 1 Alnus serrulata 15 Y FACW+ FAC species x 3 = FACU species x 4= 2 Populus deltoides 2 N FAC+ 3. UPL species x 5 = Column Totals: (A) (B) 4. 5. Prevalence Index = B/A = 6. Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 7. 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 8. _ 2 - Dominance Test is >50% 9. 3 - Prevalence Index is 53.0' 10. 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting 30 17_ = Total Cover data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) Herb Stratum (Plot size: ) Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 1 Juncus effusus 70 Y FACW+ — Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. 2 Ludwigia alternafolia 5 N OBL T ha latifolia 2 N OBL 3. yp q Carex ssp. 5 N Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata: 5. Tree –Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of 6 7. height. 8. Sapling/Shrub – Woody plants, excluding vines, less g. than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall. 10. Herb – All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless 11. of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall. 12. Woody vine – All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in 82 = Total Cover Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: ) height. 1. 2. 3. 4. Hydrophytic 5 Vegetation 6, Present? Yes No = Total Cover Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.) US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Interim Version SOIL Sampling Point: DP1 Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Loc2 Texture Remarks 0-12 2.5Y 4/2 75 7.5YR 4/6 20 C M Silt 7.5YR 4/6 5 C PL Silt 'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix. Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3: Histosol (Al) _ Dark Surface (S7) _ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147) Histic Epipedon (A2) _ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148) _ Coast Prairie Redox (A16) Black Histic (A3) _ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148) (MLRA 147, 148) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) _ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) Stratified Layers (A5) Depleted Matrix (F3) (MLRA 136, 147) 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N) _ Redox Dark Surface (F6) _ Red Parent Material (TF2) Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) _ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) _ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF1 2) Thick Dark Surface (Al2) _ Redox Depressions (F8) _ Other (Explain in Remarks) Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N, _ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N, MLRA 147, 148) MLRA 136) Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) _ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and Sandy Redox (S5) _ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present, _ Stripped Matrix (S6) unless disturbed or problematic. Restrictive Layer (if observed): Type: Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes `� No Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Interim Version WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Project/Site: Prosperity Ridge Road Connection Project City/County: Mecklenburg Sampling Date: 10/31/2011 Applicant/Owner: Charlotte -Mecklenburg Stormwater Services, Isaac Hinson State: NC Sampling Point: DP2 Investigator(s): Ron Johnson, PWS Section, Township, Range: N/A Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): hillslope Local relief (concave, convex, none): convex Slope (%): 5 Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P Lat: 35.373211 Long: -80.779942 Datum: NAD 83 Soil Map Unit Name: Helena sandy loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes NWI classification: UPL Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes `� No (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes `� No Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No Is the Sampled Area ✓ Hydric Soil Present? Yes No V within a Wetland? Yes No Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No Remarks: Upland point for Wetland 1 HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required) Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) _ Surface Soil Cracks (136) Surface Water (Al) _ True Aquatic Plants (1314) _ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138) High Water Table (A2) _ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl) —Drainage Patterns (1310) _ Saturation (A3) _ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) _ Moss Trim Lines (1316) Water Marks (131) _ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) _ Dry -Season Water Table (C2) _ Sediment Deposits (132) _ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) _ Crayfish Burrows (C8) Drift Deposits (133) _ Thin Muck Surface (C7) _ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Algal Mat or Crust (134) _ Other (Explain in Remarks) _ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) Iron Deposits (135) _ Geomorphic Position (D2) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137) _ Shallow Aquitard (D3) Water -Stained Leaves (B9) _ Microtopographic Relief (D4) Aquatic Fauna (1313) _ FAC -Neutral Test (D5) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes No '" Depth (inches): Water Table Present? Yes No ✓ Depth (inches): ✓ Saturation Present? Yes No '/ Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Interim Version VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: DP2 Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.) US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Interim Version Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet: Tree Stratum (Plot size: ) % Cover Species? Status Number of Dominant Species 1. That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 1 (A) 2. Total Number of Dominant 3. Species Across All Strata: 3 (B) 4. Percent of Dominant Species 5. That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 33 (A/B) 6. Prevalence Index worksheet: 7 8 Total % Cover of: Multiply by: OBL species 0 x 1 = 0 = Total Cover Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 30 ) FACW species 0 x 2 = 0 1 Liquidambar styraciflua 2 Y FAC+ FAC species 2 x 3= 6 FACU species 37 x 4 = 148 UPL species 0 x 5 = 0 Column Totals: 39 (A) 154 (B) 2. 3. 4. 5. Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.9 6. Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 7. 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 8. 2 - Dominance Test is >50% 9. 3 - Prevalence Index is 53.0' 10. 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting 30 2- = Total Cover data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) Herb Stratum (Plot size: ) Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 1 Schizachyrium scoparium 2 N FACU - Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must 2 Pueria montana 45 Y NI Solidago 10 N 3 sp. be present, unless disturbed or problematic. 4 Rubus argutus 35 Y FACU+ Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata: 5. Tree -Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of 6 7. height. 8. Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less 9. than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall. 10. Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless 11. of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall. 12. Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in 92 = Total Cover Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: ) height. 1. 2. 3. 4. Hydrophytic 5 Vegetation 6, Present? Yes No = Total Cover Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.) US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Interim Version SOIL Sampling Point: DP2 Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Loc2 Texture Remarks 0-12 10YR 6/6 100 N/A -- -- -- sandy silt 'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix. Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3: Histosol (Al) _ Dark Surface (S7) _ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147) Histic Epipedon (A2) _ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148) _ Coast Prairie Redox (A16) Black Histic (A3) _ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148) (MLRA 147, 148) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) _ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) _ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) Stratified Layers (A5) _ Depleted Matrix (F3) (MLRA 136, 147) 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N) _ Redox Dark Surface (F6) _ Red Parent Material (TF2) Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) _ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) _ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF1 2) Thick Dark Surface (Al2) _ Redox Depressions (F8) _ Other (Explain in Remarks) Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N, _ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N, MLRA 147, 148) MLRA 136) Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) _ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and Sandy Redox (S5) _ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present, _ Stripped Matrix (S6) unless disturbed or problematic. Restrictive Layer (if observed): Type: Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No Remarks: No indicator met. US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Interim Version WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Project/Site: Prosperity Ridge Road Connection Project City/County: Mecklenburg Sampling Date: 10/31/2011 Applicant/Owner: Charlotte -Mecklenburg Stormwater Services, Isaac Hinson State: NC Sampling Point: DP3 Investigator(s): Ron Johnson, PWS Section, Township, Range: N/A Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): floodplain Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope (%): 2-4 Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P Lat: 35.372757 Long: -80.779375 Datum: NAD 83 Soil Map Unit Name: Helena sandy loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes NWI classification: PEM Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes `� No (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes `� No Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No Is the Sampled Area Hydric Soil Present? Yes ✓ No within a Wetland? Yes No Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ✓ No Remarks: Wetland 2 HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required) Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) _ Surface Soil Cracks (136) Surface Water (Al) _ True Aquatic Plants (1314) _ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138) High Water Table (A2) _ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl) ✓ Drainage Patterns (1310) Saturation (A3) _ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) _ Moss Trim Lines (1316) Water Marks (131) _ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) _ Dry -Season Water Table (C2) Sediment Deposits (132) _ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) ✓ Crayfish Burrows (C8) Drift Deposits (133) _ Thin Muck Surface (C7) _ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Algal Mat or Crust (134) _ Other (Explain in Remarks) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) Iron Deposits (135) Geomorphic Position (D2) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137) _ Shallow Aquitard (D3) Water -Stained Leaves (B9) _ Microtopographic Relief (D4) Aquatic Fauna (1313) ✓ FAC -Neutral Test (D5) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth (inches): Water Table Present? Yes No Depth (inches): Saturation Present? Yes ( No Depth (inches): to surface Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes 100, No includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Interim Version VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: DP3 Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.) Wetland was mowed and certain species could not be identified below the Genus level. US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Interim Version Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet: Tree Stratum (Plot size: ) % Cover Species? Status Number of Dominant Species 1. That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 1 (A) 2. Total Number of Dominant 3. Species Across All Strata: 1 (B) 4. Percent of Dominant Species 5. That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100 (A/B) 6. Prevalence Index worksheet: 7 8 Total % Cover of: Multiply by: = Total Cover OBL species x 1 = Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: ) FACW species x 2 = 1. FAC species x 3 = FACU species x 4 = UPL species x 5 = Column Totals: (A) (B) 2. 3. 4. 5. Prevalence Index = B/A = 6. Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 8. _ 2 - Dominance Test is >50% 9. 3 - Prevalence Index is 53.0' 10. 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting 30 = Total Cover _ data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) Herb Stratum (Plot size: ) Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 1 Polygonum sp. 80 Y _ Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must 2 Nasturtium officinale 10 N OBL Carex 5 N 3 sp. be present, unless disturbed or problematic. q Festuca sp. 2 N Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata: 5. Tree -Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of 6 7. height. 8. Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less 9. than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall. 10. Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless 11. of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall. 12. Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in 97 = Total Cover Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: ) height. 1. 2. 3. 4. Hydrophytic 5 Vegetation 6, Present? Yes No = Total Cover Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.) Wetland was mowed and certain species could not be identified below the Genus level. US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Interim Version SOIL Sampling Point: DP3 Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Loc2 Texture Remarks 0-12 2.5Y 4/1 90 7.5YR 4/6 10 C M Silt 'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix. Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3: Histosol (Al) _ Dark Surface (S7) _ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147) Histic Epipedon (A2) _ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148) _ Coast Prairie Redox (A16) Black Histic (A3) _ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148) (MLRA 147, 148) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) _ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) Stratified Layers (A5) Depleted Matrix (F3) (MLRA 136, 147) 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N) _ Redox Dark Surface (F6) _ Red Parent Material (TF2) Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) _ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) _ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF1 2) Thick Dark Surface (Al2) _ Redox Depressions (F8) _ Other (Explain in Remarks) Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N, _ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N, MLRA 147, 148) MLRA 136) Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) _ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and Sandy Redox (S5) _ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present, _ Stripped Matrix (S6) unless disturbed or problematic. Restrictive Layer (if observed): Type: Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes `� No Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Interim Version WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Project/Site: Prosperity Ridge Road Connection Project City/County: Mecklenburg Sampling Date: 10/31/2011 Applicant/Owner: Charlotte -Mecklenburg Stormwater Services, Isaac Hinson State: NC Sampling Point: DP4 Investigator(s): Ron Johnson, PWS Section, Township, Range: N/A Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): hillslope Local relief (concave, convex, none): convex Slope (%): 5 Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P Lat: 35.372757 Long: -80.779375 Datum: NAD 83 Soil Map Unit Name: Helena sandy loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes NWI classification: UPL Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes `� No (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes `� No Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No Is the Sampled Area ✓ Hydric Soil Present? Yes No V within a Wetland? Yes No Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No Remarks: Upland point for Wetland 2 HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required) Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) _ Surface Soil Cracks (136) Surface Water (Al) _ True Aquatic Plants (1314) _ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138) High Water Table (A2) _ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl) —Drainage Patterns (1310) _ Saturation (A3) _ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) _ Moss Trim Lines (1316) Water Marks (131) _ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) _ Dry -Season Water Table (C2) _ Sediment Deposits (132) _ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) _ Crayfish Burrows (C8) Drift Deposits (133) _ Thin Muck Surface (C7) _ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Algal Mat or Crust (134) _ Other (Explain in Remarks) _ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) Iron Deposits (135) _ Geomorphic Position (D2) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137) _ Shallow Aquitard (D3) Water -Stained Leaves (B9) _ Microtopographic Relief (D4) Aquatic Fauna (1313) _ FAC -Neutral Test (D5) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes No '" Depth (inches): Water Table Present? Yes No ✓ Depth (inches): ✓ Saturation Present? Yes No '/ Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Interim Version VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: DP4 Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.) US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Interim Version Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet: Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 ) % Cover Species? Status Number of Dominant Species 1 Pinus taeda 10 Y FAC That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 1 (A) 2. Total Number of Dominant 3. Species Across All Strata: 3 (B) 4. Percent of Dominant Species 5. That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 33 (A/B) 6. Prevalence Index worksheet: 7 8 Total % Cover of: Multiply by: 10 OBL species 0 x 1 = 0 Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 30 = Total Cover ) FACW species 0 x 2 = 0 1 Juniperus virginiana 5 Y FACU- FAC species 10 x 3 = 30 FACU species 5 x 4 = 20 2. 3. UPL species 0 x 5 = 0 Column Totals: 15 (A) 50 (B) 4. 5 Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.33 6. Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 7. 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 8. 2 - Dominance Test is >50% 9. 3 - Prevalence Index is 53.0' 10. 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting 30 5- = Total Cover data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) Herb Stratum (Plot size: ) Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 1 Juniperus communis 10 N NI - Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must 2 Festuca sp. 80 Y 3. be present, unless disturbed or problematic. 4. Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata: 5. Tree -Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of 6 7. height. 8. Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less 9. than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall. 10. Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless 11. of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall. 12. Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in 90 = Total Cover Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: ) height. 1. 2. 3. 4. Hydrophytic 5 Vegetation 6, Present? Yes No = Total Cover Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.) US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Interim Version SOIL Sampling Point: DP4 Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Loc2 Texture Remarks 0-12 7.5 YR 4/4 100 N/A -- -- -- Silt 'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix. Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3: Histosol (Al) _ Dark Surface (S7) _ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147) Histic Epipedon (A2) _ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148) _ Coast Prairie Redox (A16) Black Histic (A3) _ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148) (MLRA 147, 148) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) _ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) _ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) Stratified Layers (A5) _ Depleted Matrix (F3) (MLRA 136, 147) 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N) _ Redox Dark Surface (F6) _ Red Parent Material (TF2) Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) _ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) _ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF1 2) Thick Dark Surface (Al2) _ Redox Depressions (F8) _ Other (Explain in Remarks) Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N, _ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N, MLRA 147, 148) MLRA 136) Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) _ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and Sandy Redox (S5) _ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present, _ Stripped Matrix (S6) unless disturbed or problematic. Restrictive Layer (if observed): Type: Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No Remarks: No indicator met. US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Interim Version NCDWR (formerly DWQ) Stream Assessment Forms NC Division of Water Quality—Methodology for Iderltification of Intermittent and Perennial Streams and Their Origins v" 4"1 NC DWO Stream Identifiientinn Farm Vorcinn d 11 44 . �.' I tate: G j�{ ProjecUSite_ f Latitude: 3, 5F73731k Longitude: ', 77q?26, Evaluator: County: TotaSfw s af;ts: S7+e rri r8 of Jedst rnfe�+�Pftenr Stream Determinatfbrt {c_ir_ fe anp , Other ri_ r ar 19 err nr?W if 30, Ephemeral Interrxtltlenit Ferenni e.y uar� �Jdrre: i A. Geomorphology (subtotal =_L,5 10 Absent Weak Moderate Strong V" Continuity of channel bed and bank . Sinuosity of channel along thaMeg _ 0 0 "l 1 1 2 - 3 3 3. lin channel strui 4Wre: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool, Fipple-PCKA se ueracC D 0 2^ 3 4, Particle size of stream substrate 0 1 K2j, 3 5. ,Activelrelicl floodplain 0 1 1 _ 1.5 B. Dapositional bars or benches 0 No = Q 2 3 7. Recent alluvial deposits 0 1212 3 p 9, Headcuts 0 1) 2 3. 9. Grade control 0 0.5 1 1 e5 1 iaLFf ural valley 0 0.5 (11 '1,5 11- Second or greaier order Channel Yes = 3 a artificial ditches are rat rated; see discussions in manual 8. HYdLgI0gj {Subtotal = 7,97 12, Preseoc+e of Baseflow r7 t 1 3 13. Iran oxidizing bacteria 3 - 2 _. 3 14, Leaf litter 4, 1 0.5 0 15. godirnent on punts or debris 0 1 1.5 16, Q rgan°rC debris Imes or piles 0 .5 1 _ 1.5 17, S+il-based evidence of hlglh wa er table? - 24. ,Amphibians 25. Algae No = Q 0. FA0V4+= 0-75; 1 GBL - 1,5 ether -0 C_ Bioloriv (Aiihintal = 1 _ F,. Vdellarhel plants in streambed _ _ "perennial streams may aIsa he i0enl,fieit using other mathvds. See Notes. Sketch. 18. fibrous roots in streambed 2 1 D 19, Rooted upland plants in streambed 3 2 1 0 20_ Macra"nthcs fnote diversity and abun(lance) D 1 2 � 21_ Aquatic Mo � {f)1 2 22, f=ish U a - 0 0.5 0.5 0, 1 1 1 1.5 1.5 1.5 23, Crayfish _ 24. ,Amphibians 25. Algae 0 j p. 3.5 of manual. 0. FA0V4+= 0-75; 1 GBL - 1,5 ether -0 1.5 _ F,. Vdellarhel plants in streambed _ _ "perennial streams may aIsa he i0enl,fieit using other mathvds. See Notes. Sketch. 41 NC Division of Water Quality—Methodology for Identification of Intermittent and Perennial Streams and Their Origins v. 4.11 NC I)WO Stream Identification on Form Version 4.11 ' "" —,I t ` -* Dat a4 i + Project[Site: Latitude: .7 1 Evaluator., ^,. County: + l`nng i# U de; _ a 77qk' 7 Total Paints: Stream is �esl iolermr'tfent Stream DeterminatiDn (circle one) -- Other ,� et r i9 or sraxrrraadaY t _ p $mer i Intermittent Perennial e.g. Quay' Name. A. Geornor holo S;ubto l T ) 1' Continuity of channel sed and bank 2, Sinuosity of charnel Mang thalweg Absent tr I 1 Weak 1 Moderate 2 2 Strong 3 3 Int -channel strudure: ex. riffle -pool, stop -pod, riple- ocl sequence 2 Cl_ 6 i 2 3 4. Particle size of stream substrate 1 1 22 3 5. Activelrelict'floodplain --. 22, Fish 1 2 3 6, Depositional bars or benches � Q� 1 2 3 7, Recent alluvial deposits b) 1 2 3 8_ Headcaats -- 0'.,, 1 2 3 9, Grade control 'perennial streerns rx ay also be identified using tither methods. 0.5 1 10. Natural valley 11. Second cr greater order channel No - 0 Yes = 3 artFflGlal ditC1'ies ere riot rated: sem di�e�ala�n5,n manual w B. Hydrology (Subtotal = 12_ Presence of Seseilow 1 2 3 13. Iron oxidizing bacteria 1 2 Cl_ 6 3 _ 14. Laaf litter 1.5 1 15. Sediment on plants or debris t} 0. 1 1 i,5 1,5 16.. Organic debris Imes or piles 0,5 17, Sail -based evidence of high watertable? No =UO C_ Biology (Subtotal 18- Fibrosus roots in strearnbed � 2 1 0 19, Rooted upland plants in strearnbed 3 2 1 0 24. Macrobenthos (note diversity end abundance)- -- i 2 21 _ Aquatic Mollusks Q 1 2 3 -- 22, Fish 0,5 1 1,5 23. Crayfish &0.5 1 1,5 24. Amphibians0 �... €l,5 1 1.5 25.I�Jgae ,S 1 1.6 26. Wetland plants n strearnbed FACW 0.76; OBL _ 1,5 Other 0 'perennial streerns rx ay also be identified using tither methods. See p. 35 Df manual. --- - I Sketch: 41 OFFICE USE ONLY: USACE AID# DWQ# STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET Stream 1 ■1 1. Applicant's Name: Charlotte -Mecklenburg — SWS 2. Evaluator's Name: R. Johnson 3. Date of Evaluation: 10/31/2011 4. Time of Evaluation 11:00 5. Name of Stream: Tributary of Stony Creek 6. River Basin: Upper Pee Dee 7. Approximate Drainage Area: 85 acres 8. Stream Order: 1 st 9. Length of Reach Evaluated: 800 feet 10. County: Mecklenburg 11. Location of reach under evaluation (include nearby roads and landmarks): Ridge Road, 0.30 mile east of Prosperity Church Road -Ridge Road intersection. 12. Site Coordinates (if known): Lat: 35.373141 Long: -80.779926 13. Proposed Channel Work (if any): Culvert replacement and extension, stabilization 14. Recent Weather Conditions: Rain within past 48 hours 15. Site conditions at time of visit: 55 degrees, clear 16. Identify any special waterway classifications known: Section 10 Tidal Waters Essential Fisheries Habitat _Trout Waters _Outstanding Resource Waters Nutrient Sensitive Waters _Water Supply Watershed (I-IV) 17. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? YES e If yes, estimate the water surface area: 18. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? YES NO 19. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? YES NO 20. Estimated Watershed Land Use: 90 % Residential % Commercial % Industrial % Agricultural 10 % Forested % Cleared / Logged % Other ( ) 21. Bankfull Width: 23. Channel slope down center of stream: _Flat (0 to 2%) 22. Bank Height (from bed to top of bank): 2 feet X Gentle (2 to 4%) Moderate (4 to 10%) Steep (>10%) 24. Channel Sinuosity: Straight X Occasional Bends _Frequent Meander _Very Sinuous _Braided Channel Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points to each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the characteristics identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the comment section. Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture into a forest), the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each reach. The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the highest quality. Total Score (from reverse): 51 Comments: Evaluator's Signature f- 1 Date 10/31/2011 This channel evaluation form ' ntended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in gathering the data required the United States Army Corps of Engineers in order to make a preliminary assessment of stream quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change — version 05/03. To Comment, please call 919-876-8441 x 26. STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET Stream 1 * These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams. ECOREGION POINT RANGE # CHARACTERISTICS SCORE Coastal Piedmont Mountain 1no Presence of flow / persistent pools in stream 0 - 4 0-5 3 flow or saturation = 0; strongflow = maxpoints)0-5 2 Evidence of past human alteration 0-6 0 - 5 0-5 2 (extensive alteration = 0; no alteration = max points) 3 Riparian zone 0-6 0-4 0-5 2 no buffer = 0; contiguous, wide buffer = maxpoints) 4 Evidence of nutrient or chemical discharges 0 - 4 0-4 2 extensive discharges = 0; no discharges = maxpoints)0-5 5 Groundwater discharge 0-3 0-4 0-4 3 (no discharge = 0; springs, see s, wetlands, etc. = maxpoints) 6 Presence of adjacent floodplain 0-4 0-4 0-2 2 no floodplain = 0; extensive floodplain = maxpoints) Entrenchment / floodplain access 0-5 0-4 0-2 3 (deeply entrenched = 0; frequent flooding = max points 8 Presence of adjacent wetlands 0-6 0-4 0-2 3 (no wetlands = 0; large adjacent wetlands = maxpoints) 9 Channel sinuosity 0-5 0-4 0-3 2 extensive channelization = 0; natural meander = maxpoints) 10 Sediment input 0-5 0-4 0-4 2 extensive deposition= 0; little or no sediment = maxpoints) 11 Size & diversity of channel bed substrate NA* 0 - 4 0-5 2 (fine, homogenous = 0; large, diverse sizes = maxpoints) 12 Evidence of channel incision or widening 0-5 0-4 0-5 3 ya (deeply incised = 0; stable bed & banks = maxpoints) 0 13 Presence of major bank failures 0 - 5 0- 5 0-5 3 0 severe erosion = 0; no erosion, stable banks = maxpoints) 14 Root depth and density on banks 0-3 0-4 0-5 3 (no visible roots = 0; dense roots throughout = maxpoints) 15 Impact by agriculture or livestock production 0-5 0 - 4 0-5 4 (substantial impact =0; no evidence = max points) 16 Presence of riffle-pool/ripple-pool complexes 0-3 0-5 0-6 2 (no riffles/ripples or pools = 0; well-developed = maxpoints) 17 Habitat complexity 0-6 0-6 0-6 3 little or no habitat = 0; frequent, varied habitats = maxpoints) 18 Canopy coverage over streambed 0-5 0-5 0-5 2 no shading vegetation = 0; continuous canopy = maxpoints) 19 Substrate embeddedness NA* 0-4 0-4 2 (deeply embedded = 0; loose structure = max) 20 Presence of stream invertebrates 0-4 0-5 0-5 1 no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = maxpoints) 21 Presence of amphibians 0-4 0-4 0-4 1 O no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = maxpoints) 04 22 Presence of fish 0-4 0 - 4 0-4 0 (no evidence = 0; common, numerous es = max points)Pq 23 Evidence of wildlife use 0-6 0-5 0-5 1 no evidence = 0; abundant evidence = maxpoints) Total Points Possible 100 100 100 TOTAL SCORE (also enter on first page) 51 * These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams. OFFICE USE ONLY: USACE AID# DWQ# STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET Non -Jurisdictional Stream 2 ■1 1. Applicant's Name: Charlotte - Mecklenburg — SWS 2. Evaluator's Name: R. Johnson 3. Date of Evaluation: 10/31/2011 4. Time of Evaluation: 10:45 5. Name of Stream: Unnamed Tributary of Stony Creek 6. River Basin: Upper Pee Dee 7. Approximate Drainage Area: 0.90 acre 8. Stream Order: 1 st 9. Length of Reach Evaluated: 100 feet 10. County: Mecklenburg 11. Location of reach under evaluation (include nearby roads and landmarks): South side of Ridge Road, approximately 0.30 mile east of the Ridge Road -Prosperity Church Road intersection. 12. Site Coordinates (if known): Lat: 35.372773 , Long: -80.779459 13. Proposed Channel Work (if any): none 14. Recent Weather Conditions: Rain within the past 48 hours 15. Site conditions at time of visit: 55 decrees, clear 16. Identify any special waterway classifications known: Section 10 Tidal Waters Essential Fisheries Habitat _Trout Waters _Outstanding Resource Waters Nutrient Sensitive Waters _Water Supply Watershed (I-IV) 17. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? YES e If yes, estimate the water surface area:_ 18. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? YES 100 19. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? YES 20. Estimated Watershed Land Use: 100% Residential % Commercial % Industrial % Agricultural % Forested % Cleared / Logged % Other ( ) 21. Bankfull Width: 1 23. Channel slope down center of stream: _Flat (0 to 2%) 22. Bank Height (from bed to top of bank): <1 foot X Gentle (2 to 4%) Moderate (4 to 10%) Steep (>10%) 24. Channel Sinuosity: X Straight _Occasional Bends _Frequent Meander _Very Sinuous _Braided Channel Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points to each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the characteristics identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the comment section. Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture into a forest), the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each reach. The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the highest quality. Total Score (from reverse): 26 Comments: Evaluator's Signature ['^— Date 10/31/2011 This channel evaluation form *I ntended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in gathering the data required the United States Army Corps of Engineers in order to make a preliminary assessment of stream quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change — version 05/03. To Comment, please call 919-876-8441 x 26. STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET Non -Jurisdictional Stream 2 * These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams. ECOREGION POINT RANGE # CHARACTERISTICS SCORE Coastal Piedmont Mountain 1 Presence of flow / persistent pools in stream 0-5 0-4 0-5 0 (no flow or saturation = 0; strong flow = max points) 2 Evidence of past human alteration 0-6 0-5 0-5 0 (extensive alteration = 0; no alteration = maxpoints) 3 Riparian zone 0-6 0-4 0-5 1 no buffer = 0; contiguous, wide buffer = maxpoints) 4 Evidence of nutrient or chemical discharges 0-5 0-4 0-4 2 extensive discharges = 0; no discharges = max points) 5 Groundwater discharge 0-3 0-4 0-4 0 U (no discharge = 0; springs, see s, wetlands, etc. = maxpoints) 6 Presence of adjacent floodplain 0-4 0-4 0-2 1 no floodplain = 0; extensive floodplain = maxpoints) 7 Entrenchment / floodplain access 0-5 0-4 0-2 3 p' (deeply entrenched = 0; frequent flooding = maxpoints) 8 Presence of adjacent wetlands 0-6 0-4 0-2 1 (no wetlands = 0; large adjacent wetlands = maxpoints) 9 Channel sinuosity 0-5 0-4 0-3 0 extensive channelization = 0; natural meander = max oints 10 Sediment input 0-5 0-4 0-4 3 (extensive deposition- 0; little or no sediment = maxpoints) 11 Size & diversity of channel bed substrate NA* 0-4 0-5 0 (fine, homogenous = 0; large, diverse sizes = maxpoints) 12 Evidence of channel incision or widening 0-5 0-4 0- 5 4 (deeply incised = 0; stable bed & banks = maxpoints) F". 13 Presence of major bank failures 0-5 0-5 0- 5 4 severe erosion = 0; no erosion, stable banks = max points) 14 Root depth and density on banks 0-3 0-4 0-5 2 H (no visible roots = 0; dense roots throughout = maxpoints) 15 Impact by agriculture or livestock production 0-5 0 - 4 0-5 4 substantial impact =0; no evidence = maxpoints) 16 Presence of riffle-pool/ripple-pool complexes 0-3 0-5 0-6 0 (no riffles/ripples or pools = 0; well-developed = max oints t7 Habitat complexity Habitat 0 - 6 0-6 0 or no habitat = 0; frequent, varied habitats = maxpoints)0-6 18 Canopy coverage over streambed 0-5 0-5 0-5 0 no shading vegetation = 0; continuous canopy = maxpoints) 19 Substrate embeddedness NA* 0-4 0-4 1 (deeply embedded = 0; loose structure = max) 20 Presence of stream invertebrates 0-4 0-5 0-5 0 (no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = maxpoints) 21 Presence of amphibians 0-4 0-4 0-4 0 O no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = maxpoints) 22 Presence of fish 0-4 0 - 4 0-4 0 (no evidence = 0; common, numerous es = max points) 23 Evidence of wildlife use 0-6 0-5 0-5 0 (no evidence = 0; abundant evidence = maxpoints) Total Points Possible 100 100 100 TOTAL SCORE (also enter on first page) 26 * These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams. USACE Approved Jurisdictional Determination Form APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION FORM U.S. Army Corps of Engineers This form should be completed by following the instructions provided in Section IV of the JD Form Instructional Guidebook SECTION L• BACKGROUND INFORMATION A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (JD): B. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER: C. PROJECT LOCATION AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION: State: North Carolina County/parish/borough: Mecklenburg County City: Charlotte Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format): Lat. 35.373141° 1, Long. -80.779926° Universal Transverse Mercator: Name of nearest waterbody: Streams 1 and 2 are unnamed tributaries to Stony Creek Name of nearest Traditional Navigable Water (TNW) Into which the aquatic resource flows: Catawba River Name of watershed or Hydrologic Unit Code (HUC): Upper Pee Dee (CU 03040105) Check if map/diagram of review area and/or potential jurisdictional areas is/are available upon request. Check if other sites (e.g., offsite mitigation sites, disposal sites, etc...) are associated with this action and are recorded on a different JD form. D. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY): Office (Desk) Determination. Date: Field Determination. Date(s): 10/31/2011 SECTION II: SUMMARY OF FINDINGS A. RHA SECTION 10 DETERMINATION OF JURISDICTION. There Are no "navigable waters of the U.S." within Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) jurisdiction (as defined by 33 CFR part 329) in the review area. [Required] ❑ Waters subject to the ebb and flow of the tide. ❑ Waters are presently used, or have been used in the past, or may be susceptible for use to transport interstate or foreign commerce. Explain: Waters/wetlands are isolated. B. CWA SECTION 404 DETERMINATION OF JURISDICTION. There M"waters of the U.S." within Clean Water Act (CWA) jurisdiction (as defined by 33 CFR part 328) in the review area. [Required] 1. Waters of the U.S. a. Indicate presence of waters of U.S. in review area (check all that apply): ' TNWs, including territorial seas Wetlands adjacent to TNWs Relatively permanent waters2 (RPWs) that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs Non-RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs Wetlands directly abutting RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs Wetlands adjacent to but not directly abutting RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs Wetlands adjacent to non-RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs Impoundments of jurisdictional waters Isolated (interstate or intrastate) waters, including isolated wetlands b. Identify (estimate) size of waters of the U.S. in the review area: Non -wetland waters: Stream I - 800 feet, Stream 2 - 100 feet linear feet: 1-4 width (ft) and/or acres. Wetlands: acres. c. Limits (boundaries) of jurisdiction based on: Elevation of established OHWM (if known):unknown. Non-regulated waters/wetlands (check if applicable):3 Potentially jurisdictional waters and/or wetlands were assessed within the review area and determined to be not jurisdictional. Explain: 1 Boxes checked below shall be supported by completing the appropriate sections in Section III below. 2 For purposes of this form, an RPW is defined as a tributary that is not a TNW and that typically flows year-round or has continuous flow at least "seasonally" (e.g., typically 3 months). s Supporting documentation is presented in Section III.F. SECTION III: CWA ANALYSIS A. TNWs AND WETLANDS ADJACENT TO TNWs The agencies will assert jurisdiction over TNWs and wetlands adjacent to TNWs. If the aquatic resource is a TNW, complete Section III.A.1 and Section IH.D.l. only; if the aquatic resource is a wetland adjacent to a TNW, complete Sections III.A.1 and 2 and Section IILD.1.; otherwise, see Section IILB below. 1. TNW Identify TNW: Summarize rationale supporting determination: Wetland adjacent to TNW Summarize rationale supporting conclusion that wetland is "adjacent': B. CHARACTERISTICS OF TRIBUTARY (THAT IS NOT A TNW) AND ITS ADJACENT WETLANDS (IF ANY): This section summarizes information regarding characteristics of the tributary and its adjacent wetlands, if any, and it helps determine whether or not the standards for jurisdiction established under Rapanos have been met. The agencies will assert jurisdiction over non -navigable tributaries of TNWs where the tributaries are "relatively permanent waters" (RPWs), i.e. tributaries that typically flow year-round or have continuous flow at least seasonally (e.g., typically 3 months). A wetland that directly abuts an RPW is also jurisdictional. If the aquatic resource is not a TNW, but has year-round (perennial) flow, skip to Section IILD.2. If the aquatic resource is a wetland directly abutting a tributary with perennial flow, skip to Section III.D.4. A wetland that is adjacent to but that does not directly abut an RPW requires a significant nexus evaluation. Corps districts and EPA regions will include in the record any available information that documents the existence of a significant nexus between a relatively permanent tributary that is not perennial (and its adjacent wetlands if any) and a traditional navigable water, even though a significant nexus finding is not required as a matter of law. If the waterbody4 is not an RPW, or a wetland directly abutting an RPW, a JD will require additional data to determine if the waterbody has a significant nexus with a TNW. If the tributary has adjacent wetlands, the significant nexus evaluation must consider the tributary in combination with all of its adjacent wetlands. This significant nexus evaluation that combines, for analytical purposes, the tributary and all of its adjacent wetlands is used whether the review area identified in the JD request is the tributary, or its adjacent wetlands, or both. If the JD covers a tributary with adjacent wetlands, complete Section HI.B.1 for the tributary, Section III.B.2 for any onsite wetlands, and Section III.B.3 for all wetlands adjacent to that tributary, both onsite and offsite. The determination whether a significant nexus exists is determined in Section III.0 below. 1. Characteristics of non-TNWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNW (i) General Area Conditions: Watershed size: 800square miles Drainage area: 10 acres Average annual rainfall: 43 inches Average annual snowfall: 6 inches (ii) Physical Characteristics: (a) Relationship with TNW: ❑ Tributary flows directly into TNW. ® Tributary flows through I tributaries before entering TNW. Project waters are 30 (or more) river miles from TNW. Project waters are 1 (or less) river miles from RPW. Project waters are 30 (or more) aerial (straight) miles from TNW. Project waters are 1 (or less) aerial (straight) miles from RPW. Project waters cross or serve as state boundaries. Explain: N/A. Identify flow route to TNW5: Stream 2 flows into Stream l,which flows into Stony Creek, which flows into Mallard Creek, which flows into the Rocky River, which flows into the Pee Dee River, a TNW. 4 Note that the Instructional Guidebook contains additional information regarding swales, ditches, washes, and erosional features generally and in the and West. 5 Flow route can be described by identifying, e.g., tributary a, which flows through the review area, to flow into tributary b, which then flows into TNW. Tributary stream order, if known: First order. (b) General Tributary Characteristics (check all that apply): Tributary is: ❑ Natural ❑ Artificial (man-made). Explain: ® Manipulated (man -altered). Explain: some culverted, rip rap added. Tributary properties with respect to top of bank (estimate): Average width: 1 feet Average depth: 0-1 feet Average side slopes: E. Primary tributary substrate composition (check all that apply): ® Silts ❑ Sands ❑ Concrete ❑ Cobbles ❑ Gravel ❑ Muck ❑ Bedrock ® Vegetation. Type/% cover: in ephemeral stream, maintained lawn ❑ Other. Explain: Tributary condition/stability [e.g., highly eroding, sloughing banks]. Explain: stable banks. Presence of run/riffle/pool complexes. Explain: weak. Tributary geometry: Relatively straight Tributary gradient (approximate average slope): 2-4 % (c) Flow: Tributary provides for: Ephemeral flow Estimate average number of flow events in review area/year: 11-20 Describe flow regime: Other information on duration and volume: Surface flow is: Discrete a . Characteristics: flows through culverts. Subsurface flow: No. Explain findings: ❑ Dye (or other) test performed: Tributary has (check all that apply): ® Bed and banks ® OHWM6 (check all indicators that apply): ® clear, natural line impressed on the bank ❑ ❑ changes in the character of soil ❑ ❑ shelving ❑ ® vegetation matted down, bent, or absent ❑ ❑ leaf litter disturbed or washed away ❑ sediment deposition ❑ ❑ water staining ❑ other (list): F1Discontinuous OHWM.7 Explain: the presence of litter and debris destruction of terrestrial vegetation the presence of wrack line sediment sorting scour multiple observed or predicted flow events abrupt change in plant community If factors other than the OHWM were used to determine lateral extent of CWA jurisdiction (check all that apply): High Tide Line indicated by: 0 Mean High Water Mark indicated by: ❑ oil or scum line along shore objects ❑ survey to available datum; ❑ fine shell or debris deposits (foreshore) ❑ physical markings; ❑ physical markings/characteristics ❑ vegetation lines/changes in vegetation types. ❑ tidal gauges ❑ other (list): (iii) Chemical Characteristics: Characterize tributary (e.g., water color is clear, discolored, oily film; water quality; general watershed characteristics, etc.). Explain: no water. Identify specific pollutants, if known: potential lawn fertilizer. 6A natural or man-made discontinuity in the OHWM does not necessarily sever jurisdiction (e.g., where the stream temporarily flows underground, or where the OHWM has been removed by development or agricultural practices). Where there is a break in the OHWM that is unrelated to the waterbody's flow regime (e.g., flow over a rock outcrop or through a culvert), the agencies will look for indicators of flow above and below the break. 'Ibid. (iv) Biological Characteristics. Channel supports (check all that apply): ® Riparian corridor. Characteristics (type, average width): 5-10 feet, maintained lawns. ❑ Wetland fringe. Characteristics: ❑ Habitat for: ❑ Federally Listed species. Explain findings: ❑ Fish/spawn areas. Explain findings: ❑ Other environmentally -sensitive species. Explain findings: ❑ Aquatic/wildlife diversity. Explain findings: 2. Characteristics of wetlands adjacent to non-TNW that flow directly or indirectly into TNW (i) Physical Characteristics: (a) General Wetland Characteristics: Properties: Wetland size:Wetland 1 - 0.23 acre, Wedland 2 - 0.01 acres Wetland type. Explain:Wetland 1 - PEM/PFO, Wetland 2 - PEM. Wetland quality. Explain: Wetland 1 - Good quality, Wetland 2 - mowed. Project wetlands cross or serve as state boundaries. Explain: (b) General Flow Relationship with Non-TNW: Flow is: Intermittent flow. Explain: seasonally. Surface flow is: Discrete Characteristics: Subsurface flow: Yes. Explain findings: Hydric soil indicators present. ❑ Dye (or other) test performed: (c) Wetland Adjacency Determination with Non-TNW: ® Directly abutting ❑ Not directly abutting ❑ Discrete wetland hydrologic connection. Explain: ❑ Ecological connection. Explain: ❑ Separated by berm/barrier. Explain: (d) Proximity (Relationship) to TNW Project wetlands are 30 (or more) river miles from TNW. Project waters are 30 (or more) aerial (straight) miles from TNW. Flow is from: Wetland to navigable waters. Estimate approximate location of wetland as within the floodplain. (ii) Chemical Characteristics: Characterize wetland system (e.g., water color is clear, brown, oil film on surface; water quality; general watershed characteristics; etc.). Explain: clear water. Identify specific pollutants, if known: N/A. (iii) Biological Characteristics. Wetland supports (check all that apply): ® Riparian buffer. Characteristics (type, average width):Wetland 1 - wooded buffer 10-20', Stream 2 - lawns 5-10'. ® Vegetation type/percent cover. Explain: 100 percent cover in riparian zone. ❑ Habitat for: ❑ Federally Listed species. Explain findings: ❑ Fish/spawn areas. Explain findings: ❑ Other environmentally -sensitive species. Explain findings: ❑ Aquatic/wildlife diversity. Explain findings: 3. Characteristics of all wetlands adjacent to the tributary (if an All wetland(s) being considered in the cumulative analysis: i Approximately ( 0.24 ) acres in total are being considered in the cumulative analysis. For each wetland, specify the following: Directly abuts? (Y/N) Size (in acres) Directly abuts? (Y/N) Size (in acres) Wetland 1 (Y) 0.23 Wetland 2 (Y) 0.01 Summarize overall biological, chemical and physical functions being performed: both are provided flood storage, wildlife foraging, macrobenthic invertabrate habitat, and nutrient storage and filtration. C. SIGNIFICANT NEXUS DETERMINATION A significant nexus analysis will assess the flow characteristics and functions of the tributary itself and the functions performed by any wetlands adjacent to the tributary to determine if they significantly affect the chemical, physical, and biological integrity of a TNW. For each of the following situations, a significant nexus exists if the tributary, in combination with all of its adjacent wetlands, has more than a speculative or insubstantial effect on the chemical, physical and/or biological integrity of a TNW. Considerations when evaluating significant nexus include, but are not limited to the volume, duration, and frequency of the flow of water in the tributary and its proximity to a TNW, and the functions performed by the tributary and all its adjacent wetlands. It is not appropriate to determine significant nexus based solely on any specific threshold of distance (e.g. between a tributary and its adjacent wetland or between a tributary and the TNW). Similarly, the fact an adjacent wetland lies within or outside of a floodplain is not solely determinative of significant nexus. Draw connections between the features documented and the effects on the TNW, as identified in the Rapanos Guidance and discussed in the Instructional Guidebook. Factors to consider include, for example: • Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), have the capacity to carry pollutants or flood waters to TNWs, or to reduce the amount of pollutants or flood waters reaching a TNW? • Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), provide habitat and lifecycle support functions for fish and other species, such as feeding, nesting, spawning, or rearing young for species that are present in the TNW? • Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), have the capacity to transfer nutrients and organic carbon that support downstream foodwebs? • Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), have other relationships to the physical, chemical, or biological integrity of the TNW? Note: the above list of considerations is not inclusive and other functions observed or known to occur should be documented below: 1. Significant nexus findings for non-RPW that has no adjacent wetlands and flows directly or indirectly into TNWs. Explain findings of presence or absence of significant nexus below, based on the tributary itself, then go to Section IILD: Significant nexus findings for non-RPW and its adjacent wetlands, where the non-RPW flows directly or indirectly into TNWs. Explain findings of presence or absence of significant nexus below, based on the tributary in combination with all of its adjacent wetlands, then go to Section IIID: Significant nexus findings for wetlands adjacent to an RPW but that do not directly abut the RPW. Explain findings of presence or absence of significant nexus below, based on the tributary in combination with all of its adjacent wetlands, then go to Section IILD: D. DETERMINATIONS OF JURISDICTIONAL FINDINGS. THE SUBJECT WATERS/WETLANDS ARE (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY): 1. TNWs and Adjacent Wetlands. Check all that apply and provide size estimates in review area: ❑ TNWs: linear feet width (ft), Or, acres. ❑, Wetlands adjacent to TNWs: acres. RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs. Tributaries of TNWs where tributaries typically flow year-round are jurisdictional. Provide data and rationale indicating that tributary is perennial: Stream 1 was observed in the field as having features characteristic of perennial flow regimes. See Appendix D for stream classification forms. Tributaries of TNW where tributaries have continuous flow "seasonally" (e.g., typically three months each year) are jurisdictional. Data supporting this conclusion is provided at Section III.B. Provide rationale indicating that tributary flows seasonally: Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters in the review area (check all that apply): Tributary waters: 800 linear feet2-4 width (ft). Other non -wetland waters: acres. Identify type(s) of waters: Non-RPWss that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs. ❑ Waterbody that is not a TNW or an RPW, but flows directly or indirectly into a TNW, and it has a significant nexus with a TNW is jurisdictional. Data supporting this conclusion is provided at Section III.C. Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters within the review area (check all that apply): ❑ Tributary waters: linear feet width (ft). ❑ Other non -wetland waters: acres. Identify type(s) of waters: 4. Wetlands directly abutting an RPW that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs. ® Wetlands directly abut RPW and thus are jurisdictional as adjacent wetlands. ® Wetlands directly abutting an RPW where tributaries typically flow year-round. Provide data and rationale indicating that tributary is perennial in Section III.D.2, above. Provide rationale indicating that wetland is directly abutting an RPW: wetland is contiguous with Stream 1. Wetlands directly abutting an RPW where tributaries typically flow "seasonally." Provide data indicating that tributary is seasonal in Section III.13 and rationale in Section III.D.2, above. Provide rationale indicating that wetland is directly abutting an RPW: Provide acreage estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review area: 0.24 acres. 5. Wetlands adjacent to but not directly abutting an RPW that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs. d Wetlands that do not directly abut an RPW, but when considered in combination with the tributary to which they are adjacent and with similarly situated adjacent wetlands, have a significant nexus with a TNW are jurisidictional. Data supporting this conclusion is provided at Section III.C. Provide acreage estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review area: acres. 6. Wetlands adjacent to non-RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs. ❑ Wetlands adjacent to such waters, and have when considered in combination with the tributary to which they are adjacent and with similarly situated adjacent wetlands, have a significant nexus with a TNW are jurisdictional. Data supporting this conclusion is provided at Section M.C. Provide estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review area: acres. Impoundments of jurisdictional waters. Asa general rule, the impoundment of a jurisdictional tributary remains jurisdictional. ❑ Demonstrate that impoundment was created from "waters of the U.S.," or Demonstrate that water meets the criteria for one of the categories presented above (1-6), or Demonstrate that water is isolated with a nexus to commerce (see E below). E. ISOLATED [INTERSTATE OR INTRA -STATE] WATERS, INCLUDING ISOLATED WETLANDS, THE USE, DEGRADATION OR DESTRUCTION OF WHICH COULD AFFECT INTERSTATE COMMERCE, INCLUDING ANY SUCH WATERS (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):10 ❑ which are or could be used by interstate or foreign travelers for recreational or other purposes. ❑ from which fish or shellfish are or could be taken and sold in interstate or foreign commerce. ❑ which are or could be used for industrial purposes by industries in interstate commerce. ❑ Interstate isolated waters. Explain: ❑ Other factors. Explain: $See Footnote # 3. 9 To complete the analysis refer to the key in Section III.D.6 of the Instructional Guidebook. 10 Prior to asserting or declining CWA jurisdiction based solely on this category, Corps Districts will elevate the action to Corps and EPA HQ for review consistent with the process described in the Corps/EPA Memorandum Regarding CWA Act Jurisdiction Following Rapanos. Identify water body and summarize rationale supporting determination: Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters in the review area (check all that apply): ❑ Tributary waters: linear feet width (ft). ❑ Other non -wetland waters: acres. Identify type(s) of waters: ❑ Wetlands: acres. F. NON -JURISDICTIONAL WATERS, INCLUDING WETLANDS (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY): ■ If potential wetlands were assessed within the review area, these areas did not meet the criteria in the 1987 Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual and/or appropriate Regional Supplements. Review area included isolated waters with no substantial nexus to interstate (or foreign) commerce. ❑ Prior to the Jan 2001 Supreme Court decision in "SWANCC," the review area would have been regulated based solely on the "Migratory Bird Rule" (MBR). ®Waters do not meet the "Significant Nexus" standard, where such a finding is required for jurisdiction. Explain: Other: (explain, if not covered above): Stream 2 is a non -jurisdictional roadside ditch through uplands. Provide acreage estimates for non jurisdictional waters in the review area, where the sole potential basis of jurisdiction is the MBR factors (i.e., presence of migratory birds, presence of endangered species, use of water for irrigated agriculture), using best professional judgment (check all that apply): ❑ Non -wetland waters (i.e., rivers, streams): linear feet width (ft). ❑ Lakes/ponds: acres. ❑ Other non -wetland waters: acres. List type of aquatic resource: ❑ Wetlands: acres. Provide acreage estimates for non jurisdictional waters in the review area that do not meet the "Significant Nexus" standard, where such a finding is required for jurisdiction (check all that apply): ❑ Non -wetland waters (i.e., rivers, streams): linear feet, width (ft). ❑ Lakes/ponds: acres. ❑ Other non -wetland waters: acres. List type of aquatic resource: ❑ Wetlands: acres. SECTION IV: DATA SOURCES. A. SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for JD (check all that apply - checked items shall be included in case file and, where checked and requested, appropriately reference sources below): Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the applicant/consultant: Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the applicant/consultant. ❑ Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report. ❑ Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report. Data sheets prepared by the Corps: Corps navigable waters' study: U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas: ❑ USGS NHD data. ❑ USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps. ® U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name: 1:2,000, Derita Quad, 1993. ® USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation: SSURGO. ❑ National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name: ❑ State/Local wetland inventory map(s): ❑ FEMA/FIRM maps: ❑ 100 -year Floodplain Elevation is: (National Geodectic Vertical Datum of 1929) ® Photographs: ® Aerial (Name & Date):unknown. or ❑ Other (Name & Date): ❑ Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter: ❑ Applicable/supporting case law: ❑ Applicable/supporting scientific literature: ❑ Other information (please specify): B. ADDITIONAL COMMENTS TO SUPPORT JD: See Appendix D for Stream Classification data forms. APPENDIX E Site Photographs ,"; r,rrr+u�;;„�rra?ssS4e ►4� �f...�l�� rr `d' ry1n= 4 OL s�`�, c Y gsihy J .. r• ( r Mrd • .� '''� �.�''`J "� � � 4 _ �k w ^ ,f ,nye .: —� 77�� • '�e r p r` �A.tw,{J fi �� r � � � ry- Photograph 7. View of Wetland 2 facing southeast. APPENDIX F 1. Storm Plan and Profile Sheet SD -1 2. Wetlands and Stream Impact Aerial 3. Plan and Profile Sheets 7 through 11 781 78( 77f 77, 76£ 76 B 76( R9+75 ` \ O XX �\� \ 029 311-38 CHARTER PROPERTIES INC DB 23185 PG 651 4925 RIDGE RD \\ \ \ \ \ STA 119+20 SD -I \ BEGIN PROP. IMPROVEMENTS \ -\/ TIE TO EX. CHANNEL \ \ \ RRAIMME ACCUMULATED \ �Ilf �fr¢am 1 S IMENT &DEBRISIS PROP. X26 2 OF \\ \ MAIN CLASS 250 - I \ �\ ENCASEMENT P* E \ ROP 3O BANK �O ' PROP OF K / \ REMO 7 nq J UE � - 01- 029-313-03 / WiL D. BURCH _ OB 5310 WAVERL15384 Y LYNN "L 452 SO\ p. 0.Oi- re Wetland \ 41$`WAT€ MAIN /029-313-02 / Y VAL (TYR) ROBERT LYNCH %manent Impact pROP 100 TY RAIL Sow ,, .a4575 PG 378 CLD P50.04A 08 =A Ll LYNN 028-313'- I / \ANGIETRA OR DB 4774 G 334 v I 24• srEE� , . //f_ .50• THICK) OADWAY E L- J EX. CB ur ///� Nil OF RCP, / . c+: Sd . / J 1 Vy ,17 (OADWftT�ASEbNE Y-1 / by �O? a HARDWOOD 20" HAR/ R9 UT p 4, ` INVE IN 639 J \ INV OUT 63.80' P. 8 P .SEW BSOSAN S 02EX1$t 74- �e UT �3 6 AVAVERL LYNN LN. % '' / A. 12 g 77 SD -1 j.o /RROP. 8 SDI SA /INZe,=] 23 / 'I1 O 350 I - /76350 I _ J \ .�/ NVERT IN- 36324 ssNHT CJ J INVER�OUT ]fi320 RIM 77020' 784 r• .�C 780 • I 776 z 772 768 Wo s � P. �5z 764 G 760 apa SEE ROADWAY PLAN NE NVERT na.5z'r� \ \\l - AND PROFILE SHEET FOR To REMAIN - \- PROP. IMPROVEMENTS m 8"METAL ° _ TO RIDGE ROAD AND PIPE \ ASPHALT /f E DRIVE PROSPERITY RIDGE ROAD � � o — �/ OONC JE y / � DRIVE / - PROP 60 LF+ O MIN 0.5D% ANGULAR GRASS I CHIANNEL SECTION SEE DETAIL SHEET SO FFi'N 2g1 UE 16 `1M 1A MEL i L jq EE%H 029-411-01 E bg REECE EARL UNTZ i/// Approximately 304 LF of existing -1�ry g9 AND LINDA F. UNTZ stream channel to be relocated. \ FE, ��ry DB 2585 PG 286 Z 4902 RIDGE RD QO - / BUILDING OfFE. tiNs''_ - 0 OD 1 OR ADE DITCH TO DRAIN TO STRUCTURE 18 qo \� 0.23 -acre Wetland �— e -e 7 \ \ Permanent Impact e E� 'Pqo woo 3 " - IN M DWOOD 72- GRADE AREA TO DRAIN - -i NI RBW006 12" \ TO PROP CHANNEL $TX tPRSO#VE SD -1 \ \ \� /- FND, PROP IMPR�ViM _ �- IIF ` ARDW 20" \ \ \ \ HARDWOOD }�� _ 1 _ �� ♦ m ARDWDOD �H DWOOD t8" F DWO \ \ HARDWOOD H RDWOOD 1�6"�-� __ OV 16" - - A D C a 4 HA WOOD F � n ¢ _ - = ou ' ---` ROP BOTTOM OF BANK __ 3- ��^�.-�_�.-.�. f 55 ^ Towag" ss 05s, SEWER - - - F C? •" � SS INVERT - 0.98 \6,� INVERI LN=7fi391 12 _. _ -- - SS - - _ } y - NVERT OUl\760\90 q\ a, / / ,Q• / / INVERT OUT -76382 // INVERT 69 43 p{,\ _ -- 4s P. 8• DIP SAN SEWER - O / RIM 775.55. _ _ IN ERT IN -771 59 TO REMAIN . Y O - / NVEP.i'IN 769 66' / \ RE N CHARLOTTE NLEBU g. _ _ - - -- UTILITY DEPARTMENT BURGAS PE ---_ ----___-_ ,��-_�- E• -y RIG1,y,, .�C �`�'<� �i CO J y° _ 2.F'?, /a `\ "\ Q/ ARO \ PROSPERITY ANNEXATION PORCH ROAD AREA'/ 3 W N H\\- 0.' \ z• �� U e� / O• Sp \ \ \SHEET 9 OF 20 029-411-90 p A\ --- CAROLINA STYLE/------ / Er ly q Ge F�Q� \ y PROPERTIES 73' C P7 �V / `. ,�°� ,(/ v </e V A V DB 18489 PG I / `J \ PROSPERITY RIDD • O F' [� a a Q7 •� o� J� 029 -411 -oz = o / \ \ \/ T/2 ' RIM 774.51' \ /1 \ I. / /� / \ J �'°' CAROLINA STYLE INVERT OUT=766.85' P INVER RIM=]75.55' R/ViO \ 02931510 \ O �� g. S`MA/ / %. DB�84 9E P553 \INVERI //2.5450 -]]3.17' RT OUT 772.21' �F \\� \ \ \\ \� _1 SERYL R. LEAMING AND - '`o}// sf N 3 SEE SHEET SD -3 / /y/ ��' 4758 RIDGE RD \\\ ��%Qi�� SEE SHEET SD -2 9a�consWtants / /f - / Aa. �A""I"° -- \ /7 `� ,'/ ` q Markups b GAI Consultants, Inc. - DB -16927 PG 215 \ FOR RIDGE RD. /� i v vv F AA �1 _ o FOR PROSPERITY RIDGE P Y Q A 5305 WAVERLY LYNN LN. IMPROVEMENTS J `° / / T / e s \\ -`\ Qn Qn ` / / / \\ \� RD. IMPROVEMENTS for Permitting Purposes Only --39 LF PipeExtension �■�—��---Ifs---■��_�------ Permanent Impact. ��■gg}.yyp�■��-{{F��ti��l��[��l��yB��■�� ----� L'T.�iii■■� AAI—�[�--� ---,■�I'�,+�■� �—f��■� �— ��■�■rte �111��Ir��A�■■�� iii�i��CIJ��i•I■I��■�1��!� ■��f��7�� ■lim��. 31 ...Stream Channel Grading with Rip Rap Bank. .. a Permanent Impact ®■■li\i■P ■Iii=`wR��1�1�■I�,��■�■��I\�IR#�i•�I■I��■moi■�� ' � I�i1��■_\■��=i�l■ ■ !tea®i1� R9+75 ` \ O XX �\� \ 029 311-38 CHARTER PROPERTIES INC DB 23185 PG 651 4925 RIDGE RD \\ \ \ \ \ STA 119+20 SD -I \ BEGIN PROP. IMPROVEMENTS \ -\/ TIE TO EX. CHANNEL \ \ \ RRAIMME ACCUMULATED \ �Ilf �fr¢am 1 S IMENT &DEBRISIS PROP. X26 2 OF \\ \ MAIN CLASS 250 - I \ �\ ENCASEMENT P* E \ ROP 3O BANK �O ' PROP OF K / \ REMO 7 nq J UE � - 01- 029-313-03 / WiL D. BURCH _ OB 5310 WAVERL15384 Y LYNN "L 452 SO\ p. 0.Oi- re Wetland \ 41$`WAT€ MAIN /029-313-02 / Y VAL (TYR) ROBERT LYNCH %manent Impact pROP 100 TY RAIL Sow ,, .a4575 PG 378 CLD P50.04A 08 =A Ll LYNN 028-313'- I / \ANGIETRA OR DB 4774 G 334 v I 24• srEE� , . //f_ .50• THICK) OADWAY E L- J EX. CB ur ///� Nil OF RCP, / . c+: Sd . / J 1 Vy ,17 (OADWftT�ASEbNE Y-1 / by �O? a HARDWOOD 20" HAR/ R9 UT p 4, ` INVE IN 639 J \ INV OUT 63.80' P. 8 P .SEW BSOSAN S 02EX1$t 74- �e UT �3 6 AVAVERL LYNN LN. % '' / A. 12 g 77 SD -1 j.o /RROP. 8 SDI SA /INZe,=] 23 / 'I1 O 350 I - /76350 I _ J \ .�/ NVERT IN- 36324 ssNHT CJ J INVER�OUT ]fi320 RIM 77020' 784 r• .�C 780 • I 776 z 772 768 Wo s � P. �5z 764 G 760 apa SEE ROADWAY PLAN NE NVERT na.5z'r� \ \\l - AND PROFILE SHEET FOR To REMAIN - \- PROP. IMPROVEMENTS m 8"METAL ° _ TO RIDGE ROAD AND PIPE \ ASPHALT /f E DRIVE PROSPERITY RIDGE ROAD � � o — �/ OONC JE y / � DRIVE / - PROP 60 LF+ O MIN 0.5D% ANGULAR GRASS I CHIANNEL SECTION SEE DETAIL SHEET SO FFi'N 2g1 UE 16 `1M 1A MEL i L jq EE%H 029-411-01 E bg REECE EARL UNTZ i/// Approximately 304 LF of existing -1�ry g9 AND LINDA F. UNTZ stream channel to be relocated. \ FE, ��ry DB 2585 PG 286 Z 4902 RIDGE RD QO - / BUILDING OfFE. tiNs''_ - 0 OD 1 OR ADE DITCH TO DRAIN TO STRUCTURE 18 qo \� 0.23 -acre Wetland �— e -e 7 \ \ Permanent Impact e E� 'Pqo woo 3 " - IN M DWOOD 72- GRADE AREA TO DRAIN - -i NI RBW006 12" \ TO PROP CHANNEL $TX tPRSO#VE SD -1 \ \ \� /- FND, PROP IMPR�ViM _ �- IIF ` ARDW 20" \ \ \ \ HARDWOOD }�� _ 1 _ �� ♦ m ARDWDOD �H DWOOD t8" F DWO \ \ HARDWOOD H RDWOOD 1�6"�-� __ OV 16" - - A D C a 4 HA WOOD F � n ¢ _ - = ou ' ---` ROP BOTTOM OF BANK __ 3- ��^�.-�_�.-.�. f 55 ^ Towag" ss 05s, SEWER - - - F C? •" � SS INVERT - 0.98 \6,� INVERI LN=7fi391 12 _. _ -- - SS - - _ } y - NVERT OUl\760\90 q\ a, / / ,Q• / / INVERT OUT -76382 // INVERT 69 43 p{,\ _ -- 4s P. 8• DIP SAN SEWER - O / RIM 775.55. _ _ IN ERT IN -771 59 TO REMAIN . Y O - / NVEP.i'IN 769 66' / \ RE N CHARLOTTE NLEBU g. _ _ - - -- UTILITY DEPARTMENT BURGAS PE ---_ ----___-_ ,��-_�- E• -y RIG1,y,, .�C �`�'<� �i CO J y° _ 2.F'?, /a `\ "\ Q/ ARO \ PROSPERITY ANNEXATION PORCH ROAD AREA'/ 3 W N H\\- 0.' \ z• �� U e� / O• Sp \ \ \SHEET 9 OF 20 029-411-90 p A\ --- CAROLINA STYLE/------ / Er ly q Ge F�Q� \ y PROPERTIES 73' C P7 �V / `. ,�°� ,(/ v </e V A V DB 18489 PG I / `J \ PROSPERITY RIDD • O F' [� a a Q7 •� o� J� 029 -411 -oz = o / \ \ \/ T/2 ' RIM 774.51' \ /1 \ I. / /� / \ J �'°' CAROLINA STYLE INVERT OUT=766.85' P INVER RIM=]75.55' R/ViO \ 02931510 \ O �� g. S`MA/ / %. DB�84 9E P553 \INVERI //2.5450 -]]3.17' RT OUT 772.21' �F \\� \ \ \\ \� _1 SERYL R. LEAMING AND - '`o}// sf N 3 SEE SHEET SD -3 / /y/ ��' 4758 RIDGE RD \\\ ��%Qi�� SEE SHEET SD -2 9a�consWtants / /f - / Aa. �A""I"° -- \ /7 `� ,'/ ` q Markups b GAI Consultants, Inc. - DB -16927 PG 215 \ FOR RIDGE RD. /� i v vv F AA �1 _ o FOR PROSPERITY RIDGE P Y Q A 5305 WAVERLY LYNN LN. IMPROVEMENTS J `° / / T / e s \\ -`\ Qn Qn ` / / / \\ \� RD. IMPROVEMENTS for Permitting Purposes Only YN ,J Nyt` A .iI EX. CHANNEL 27' PROP. CHANNEL IMPROVEMENTS WITH RIPRAP TOE BEGIN PROP. IMPR EMENTS ` / TIE TO EX/. CHANNEL / 0.02 AC El.. ul-AND 38' 39' STILLING EXTENSION BASIN (8'x3' RCBC) 1 65' EX. CHANNEL 39' rCHANI / �r i[o 75' PROP. PIPE (8'x3' RCBC) 75' EX. PIPE (DUAL 36" R, 219' PROP. PIPE EXTENSION 1 Ih (8'x3' RCBC) ,1 EX. CI J r / r F 4 PROP. SAN SEWER / RELOCATION FILL/ABANDON BREAK 85' PROP.CHANNEL IMPROVEMENTS WITH RIPRAP TOE (NEW) 166' NNEL � \ EX. CHANNEL 52' \ PROP. CHANNEL IMPROVEMENTS WITH RIPRAP TOE END PROP. IMPROVEMENTS \ \ TIE TO EX. CHANNEL 0.18 AC\ (7or PUgt C R R DGE EX. WETLANDS GNT pF wqD� \ NOTE: LENGTHS MEASURED ALONG EXISTING AND PROPOSED CENTERLINE. Prosperity Ridge Connection Design - 8'x3' RCBC 11/2013 Scale 1" = 50' 804 80( 79E 79: 78E 784 78( 77f 77: 76f ❑ 791.89 791.06 790.32 789.63 788.86 787.99 787.02 786.03 785.13 784.26 ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ l� 10+00 10+50 11+G0 1 029-415-39 HAMMOND I �rE 1L 029-415-38 BO ER M R peER7513 PG 349 RIDGE R� 029-415-40 029-415-42 BOBI�Y BOH'SER AND 192NN D6 17564 P RIDGE ftD 5049 PROSPERITY FENTRE85 D. KELLY PG 247 PROSPERITY RIDGE COMMUNITY 50 45 PROSPERITY I DB 17193 15053 PROSPERITY RIDGEI RD ASSOCIATION INC DB 14042 PC 191 PROSPERITY RIDGE RD 12+54 -(Li)- 2 LEFT !)IDE ONLY -(L1)- 80.00' VC NTO EX.IN n10 SW STA E --\ C 37 *INTO 35,801T II TIE INTO EX. G&G O STA. 1G+30.03(L7) 23.50'LT 029-411-10 INC MALLARD AND -TCREEK STEWART pPTIMIST CLUB - + PVA ELEV. - 789.14 A.G._ 1." DB RDGEPRD'83 EG PROSPERITY RI RD. HIGH PI NNT ELEV. - 790.2 HIGH POINT STA. = 11+18. PVI STA. - 1 +70.74 PVI '-01ELEV. = 84.58 K- 65.7 --- - -3 wt + ^• 2.75X FINISHED GROUND PROSPERITY RIDGI PROFILE RD. -2.J4X LJ _ _ = lF OF 18' 'PE 8=DPE ®4.pq IIII I I L� nn <gm n n$ �g F� l� 10+00 10+50 11+G0 1 029-415-39 HAMMOND I �rE 1L 029-415-38 BO ER M R peER7513 PG 349 RIDGE R� 029-415-40 029-415-42 BOBI�Y BOH'SER AND 192NN D6 17564 P RIDGE ftD 5049 PROSPERITY FENTRE85 D. KELLY PG 247 PROSPERITY RIDGE COMMUNITY 50 45 PROSPERITY I DB 17193 15053 PROSPERITY RIDGEI RD ASSOCIATION INC DB 14042 PC 191 PROSPERITY RIDGE RD 12+54 -(Li)- 2 LEFT !)IDE ONLY -(L1)- e e NTO EX.IN n10 SW STA E --\ C 37 *INTO 35,801T II TIE INTO EX. G&G O STA. 11+50 12+00 12+50 _ �y F \ 1 0 _ � F 029-411-10 INC MALLARDAND �rE STEWART MALLARD CREEK c F OPTIMIST CLUB OB 4244 PG 183 e e' e START PROP. C&G TRAI RIDGE RD TE INTO EX. SW O STA. 2 STA 12+24-&G 12+72.10(LI) 3274'LT PROP. RnY PROP. PAVEMENT DTH CHANGES FROM TE INTO EX C&G - REMOVE X. 54LF 35' TO 37' FROM STA. 11+19.96-12+72.46 AT STA 12+72.60 (L1) 18.19'LT 12+54 -(Li)- 2 LEFT !)IDE ONLY -(L1)- e e NTO EX.IN n10 SW STA E --\ C �TIE I TO EX S. SWI) - C C I STA. 10+83i.8TR) 22 C I 1 T C I I I n - PROP. 6' CONC• SYI IP N:598206.61 i 3 E:1469080.43 Ridge �Oad Existing Prosperity _ - / x ' ❑ / 029- MUNIT6 ASSOCIATION IN� PROSPERITY RIDOB IC4p42 PG 191 4930 PROSPERITY RIDGE RD PROP. B' PLANTING I o - L1 - STA.12+43. „ G p 'S0'E PROSPERITY RIDGE RD. ( 92 ,6 35' STA.12+33.62 -(L1)- 10 .84' / L:183.61 PROP. V PLANTING STRIP 30' --/-I 104 100 796 192 788 184 180 76 72 168 13+00 13+5F 14+00 14+50 15+00 15+25 0 2 1lll/ W 11// i 029-411-02 /1 CAROLINA STYLE PROPERTIES LLC ° DB 18489 PG 553 4758 RIDGE RD it / _ a y e G OE %JI LL W / F9fL U /LL ILL Il 13 00 ` (LI) -a _ __ - - _� \aAE�a / / _ - LC 37' -4158'16*y � � �_� � (\ RL -797.1 ° 00' 1-(L7)Sting Pr o _ L - -�16 NCE-69.13'®sperity Ri,��e ROa - R-7355.00' T-384.35' 15 00 " CFD. O157AFDE-7395 'A U F - M - - 30 e e ADJUST -------- �M TIE INTO EX. C&G O STA. -� 12+80(L1) 20.96'RT START PROP. C&GTRANSITION STA. 14+45-(L7)- 21.93'RT \ STA.14+55.56 -(L1)- 17.70' RT. 0 029-411-90 CAROLINA STYLE PROPERTIES LLC DB 18489 PG 553 PROSPERITY RIDGE RD A Li.l z �J S PROP. (..) la' +85.89 -(L1)- 17,70' 17.70' RT. )s) REMOVE 30LF OF EX. C&G & REPAIR EX. PAVE. y gai consultants Markups by GAI Consultants, Inc. for Permitting Purposes Only Tuesday, October O7, 2013 11:30:24 AM PROP• e' CONC. SW _ �y F _ � F �rE e c F E e e' e START PROP. C&G TRAI F e e 2 STA 12+24-&G e 2 PROP. RnY END T RA - REMOVE X. 54LF 12+54 -(Li)- 2 OF GUARDRAIL NTO EX.IN n10 SW STA E 37 *INTO 35,801T I TIE INTO EX. G&G O STA. 1G+30.03(L7) 23.50'LT 029-411-10 INC MALLARD AND -TCREEK STEWART pPTIMIST CLUB DB RDGEPRD'83 30' --/-I 104 100 796 192 788 184 180 76 72 168 13+00 13+5F 14+00 14+50 15+00 15+25 0 2 1lll/ W 11// i 029-411-02 /1 CAROLINA STYLE PROPERTIES LLC ° DB 18489 PG 553 4758 RIDGE RD it / _ a y e G OE %JI LL W / F9fL U /LL ILL Il 13 00 ` (LI) -a _ __ - - _� \aAE�a / / _ - LC 37' -4158'16*y � � �_� � (\ RL -797.1 ° 00' 1-(L7)Sting Pr o _ L - -�16 NCE-69.13'®sperity Ri,��e ROa - R-7355.00' T-384.35' 15 00 " CFD. O157AFDE-7395 'A U F - M - - 30 e e ADJUST -------- �M TIE INTO EX. C&G O STA. -� 12+80(L1) 20.96'RT START PROP. C&GTRANSITION STA. 14+45-(L7)- 21.93'RT \ STA.14+55.56 -(L1)- 17.70' RT. 0 029-411-90 CAROLINA STYLE PROPERTIES LLC DB 18489 PG 553 PROSPERITY RIDGE RD A Li.l z �J S PROP. (..) la' +85.89 -(L1)- 17,70' 17.70' RT. )s) REMOVE 30LF OF EX. C&G & REPAIR EX. PAVE. y gai consultants Markups by GAI Consultants, Inc. for Permitting Purposes Only Tuesday, October O7, 2013 11:30:24 AM LEFT EDP ELEV. RIGHT EDP ELEV. 780 77E 77e' 76E 764 760 F 15+25 775.22 774.74 774.27 773.80 773.37 772.82 772.44 775.01 774.54 774.06 773.60 773.18 772.94 772.38 15+50 16+00 16+50 17+00 20+50 I CAROLINA STYLE PROPERTIES LLC xl RIDGE RD. DB 18489 PG 553 - a LL 305 -a-a�a �3 5 X305 305 :111+46.42 REMOVE EX. 24' CMP PIPE EX EDP EX, C OF F' j W� Cpl \ IIn j1 � 1 � �_ lI 7 y � ll l � • i � / /ftOBn O � 3 UZ I / PN STA. RIDGE RIDGE RD. m M7 v0, T Y'I` S G 6a 14774 PG 334 5306 WAVERLY LYNN LN _ OE FINISH GR ND PROFILE FOR -,SBE PN EIEY. =773.20 45 CSTA.19+45 GSTA. 9+60.41 - 85x PRO ERIN RIDGE RD. K - 9251 EXISTING GROUNDIN PROSPERITY RIDGE RD. -1.99% W. 5T AT PROP. ASP 08TH. 17+04 l \ m -0.7 R - FOR PROSPERITY RIDGE RD.(L7) _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ / EXI TING GROUND / PR SPERITY RIDGE RD. // 754 O 36 EX. RCP 01 1. TO BE REMOVED 7111 nE2(5 -4 -- 01. 0% TO BE REMO D _--- - Z STA. 18+45.69(L1 37.62' LT RIMELEV. 770.20 INV. IN=763.91' FFF1 FF F� �F Frz F F F 15+50 16+00 16+50 17+00 20+50 I CAROLINA STYLE PROPERTIES LLC xl OEX. SDE O 029-411-02 20+50 I CAROLINA STYLE PROPERTIES LLC START OF PROP. HANDRAIL 70LF OSTA� 17+54(L1) PER CMLDS STO.#10.36A-B RIDGE RD. DB 18489 PG 553 - a LL 305 -a-a�a �3 5 X305 305 4758 RIDGE RD REMOVE EX. 24' CMP PIPE I TIE INTO EX. SW 017+06.50 PROP. PRR CL -24.69' LT. - EX, 6' S/W _ TIEINTO EX. aG 017+06.61 PROP. PRR CL-14.0999LT. o - REPLACE EX. CB- PgO�SPEpjTY 16 00 1001 gIDGE -�1� TIE INTO EX. COG 016+70.77 REPLACE EX. CB - PROP. PRR CL -23.78' RT. N 7 R=1413' ADJUST + o ii,.m I=K. SW 016+70.77 WVS Int' o PROP. PRR CL -33.42' RT. / M - M M START OF PROP. HANDRAIL 10GLF OSTA w - M 16+77(L1) PER CMLDS STD./10.36A-0 (� 029-411-90 CAROLINA STYLE Q PROPERTIES LLC /i/ C 18489 553 G PRO0 RI ' SPERITY RIDGE RD F /p' / 4b 101 yy <\ a \ a a 17+50 18+00 18+50 �w END OF PROP. HANDRAIL 170LF OSTA ) 1 18+25.60(L7) PER CMLDS STD./10.36A-B 11 REMOVE EX. HEADWALL ) PROP. "S �. R=1513'1 PROP. PLANING STRIP WIDTH VARIES roposed Prospe S`' MATCH LINE I l I EX. 36" RCP PIPES TO BE REMOVED UTI�ITY POLE @ GUY NARES TO BE RELOCATED BY OTHERS n / H� e 2 0 55 G - 11 780 776 Ii 772 = R c D w 768 - fa 764 p;, z C oa- Q=w m = u :fws 760 m 19+00 19+50 O 20+00 20+50 2HW.42 SEE SHEET 9 I RIDGE RD. CL - Y1 - a LL 305 -a-a�a �3 5 X305 305 30S - - I F' j W� Cpl \ IIn j1 � 1 � �_ lI 7 y � ll l � • i � / /ftOBn O � 3 UZ I / ` 029-313-01 O ANGIE TRAYLOR �sBmiie s308 WAVLRLv Lm1N m M7 v0, T Y'I` S G 6a 14774 PG 334 5306 WAVERLY LYNN LN _ OE -,SBE 21 02.42 / S / F F�n F n244 ll 3\\ \ =1 B,P STN: 21.W. 2 1 infi.87 ♦ '3pS .�- _� Of 75.78 _ a �1 UTILITY POLE THETO BE R=14 �In I \� 0 o C7 ADJUSTED BY ORS O J O END OF PROP. HANDRAIL 10OF OSTA 17+77(L7) PER CMLTD OS S.#10.38A-B 3H A l I �Y N=bM301S 1 m I % / END PROP. SURFACE COURSE 1 ��7.±%_ _ \ 6S TIE INTO EX. (Ll OSTA 20+57.18-(L1) 28.09 LT Dz9-411-01 .\ 1 W a N SAWCUT & REMOVE 2.5' OF F/ \ \ \ \ \ \ PEE EARL UNTZ \ \ m 71 _l AND LINDA F. UNTZ \ \ I vp* N l EX. MONO. COISL ISLAND DB 2585 PG AND REBUILD ISLAND QACC RAMP DURING CONST. 4902 RIDGE RD ` LL I J MATCH LINE STA. 32+48.88 - SEE SHEET 9 RIDGE RD. CL -(Y1)- a� a� gal -sultants Markups by GAI Consultants, Inc. for Permitting Purposes Only NOTE: FOR PROPOSED STORM DRAINAGE INFORMATION SEE _ o .--I SHEET # SD -I TO SD -6 O Z" U1 \ in W� Cpl \ IIn j1 � 1 � �_ Z IL NI I \ _ NT s OO M3 ��- .a I \ I �� =01S � \ o 20DO � It l �1 l I Sar m M7 \ p ADJUST PED. BASE 27 SII Z S G 21 02.42 / S / F F�n F n244 ll 3\\ \ =1 B,P STN: 21.W. 2 1 infi.87 ♦ '3pS .�- _� Of 75.78 _ a �1 UTILITY POLE THETO BE R=14 �In I \� 0 o C7 ADJUSTED BY ORS O J O END OF PROP. HANDRAIL 10OF OSTA 17+77(L7) PER CMLTD OS S.#10.38A-B 3H A l I �Y N=bM301S 1 m I % / END PROP. SURFACE COURSE 1 ��7.±%_ _ \ 6S TIE INTO EX. (Ll OSTA 20+57.18-(L1) 28.09 LT Dz9-411-01 .\ 1 W a N SAWCUT & REMOVE 2.5' OF F/ \ \ \ \ \ \ PEE EARL UNTZ \ \ m 71 _l AND LINDA F. UNTZ \ \ I vp* N l EX. MONO. COISL ISLAND DB 2585 PG AND REBUILD ISLAND QACC RAMP DURING CONST. 4902 RIDGE RD ` LL I J MATCH LINE STA. 32+48.88 - SEE SHEET 9 RIDGE RD. CL -(Y1)- a� a� gal -sultants Markups by GAI Consultants, Inc. for Permitting Purposes Only NOTE: FOR PROPOSED STORM DRAINAGE INFORMATION SEE _ o .--I SHEET # SD -I TO SD -6 LEFT EDP ELEV. F-1 Lino] 790.30 787A5 786.94 784.53 782.59 781.18 779.05 777.67 776.36 775.18 773.91 F --1 LLI LLI LLI L�] 770.86 771.02 771.24 RIGHT EDP ELEV. = = = = = = = = = 777.77 776.25 77539 773.95 770.40 770.57 770.74 770.98 796 796 792 788 784 780 776 772 768 764 760 30+00 30+50 31+00 31+50 32+00 32+50 33+00 33+50 MATCH LINE STA. 18+80-(L1)- 34+00 SE \ SS \ 029 -alt -01 REECE EARL UNTZ v SOP. 15' C9NC. D/W / 6 O SS - - AND LINDA F. UNTZ \ DB 2585 PG 286 4902 RIDGE RD CM S 10.25A) ^` PROP. 2'-6' GONG. C&G O 21LF '0F D/W PIPE 4 STA,.!'32+00(ri) 27.00'LT BE REMOVED \ \- (� - Qp OE m OF UT - - \ SS 120LF OFPH. CURB Q F F e - `o - \PROF PROP. R/W Proposed r erit \ C F ADJUST wu R' Roa N: 595258.07 E:1469118.40 3 �STARLA H. C OU G =Tj ST/ 79na S m I ADJUST SSMH 55 SS 8' PVC 55 55 SS SSG Les S H SS SS 55_ SS w N ` 8<X _ _ UT T T ' _ - _ �T UT- 31 00 - _ cr) Cn LJJ i Z F • ♦. e I- Q END PROP. HANDRAIL 3)X I _II O 029-313-Oi ANGIE 4RAYLOR DB 14774 PG 334 5306 WAVERLV 1 LYNNLN 029 313-02 s wnv[- Jrnn L= - syg F \ \ 8P \ \ \ \ 2 LF OF 15 RCP 3.669, ' .8); \ TO BE RE - OVED--_-_-J \ SOFT DIG LOCATION FOR EX. 6" GAS LI E ST A.34+17. O -2.718 V. 768. 5' .80R a63R EX. SSMH STA, 32 43.39(Yl) 21.671T EG FOR RIDGE ZD. ADJUST HIM ELEV, TO 776:8' INV. IN 769.74' 57LF VC -SS =3.549OF, = 39L PVI SS OE 55 5)FT DIG LOCATION OR EX, 16 WATER VAN �- PPROX. 7.72' OFC'VERw - STA. 33+ 6.16 - APPROX. 8.36' OF COVER STA. 34+50 EV.- 762.66' 30+00 30+50 31+00 31+50 32+00 32+50 33+00 33+50 MATCH LINE STA. 18+80-(L1)- 34+00 SE \ SS \ 029 -alt -01 REECE EARL UNTZ v SOP. 15' C9NC. D/W / 6 O SS - - AND LINDA F. UNTZ \ DB 2585 PG 286 4902 RIDGE RD CM S 10.25A) ^` PROP. 2'-6' GONG. C&G O 21LF '0F D/W PIPE 4 STA,.!'32+00(ri) 27.00'LT BE REMOVED \ \- (� - Qp OE m OF UT - - \ SS 120LF OFPH. CURB Q F F e - `o - \PROF PROP. R/W Proposed r erit \ C F ADJUST wu R' Roa N: 595258.07 E:1469118.40 3 �STARLA H. C OU G =Tj ST/ 79na S m I ADJUST SSMH 55 SS 8' PVC 55 55 SS SSG Les S H SS SS 55_ SS w N T UT UT M UT UT UT T T -- IS UT 11 _ _ UT T T ' _ - _ �T UT- 31 00 - _ _ R-703.48' Ur W L:µg.98 100' TAPER - - - W w =ANCE=148.71 - - - DT w _ _ RIDGE RD. -(Yl)- 1+ i W W W W W W W11' i6' WATER W W W G UT /ii MAIN ur IT UT 3p_ IT urs START ��-�OP.\ MILLING @ RE. ING=pEyyALK - _ - - ,g .G/1� /� Ur OSTA. 30+00(Y1) \ 3O SIDEWALK � \ \ \� V IDEWALN OE OE OE OE/ _ OE OF OE OE OF -f5 T- \ // PROP. PAVT MARKING SEE PM1 ADJUST PED. BASE START PROP. SURFACE COURSE SAWCl1T &REMOVE 2.5' OF THAT TIES INTO EX. C&G EX. MONO. OONC. ISLAND O STA. 32+02.00-(ri) 43.14' RT. AND REBUILD ISLAND & ACC RAMP DURING CONST. START PROP. H DRAIL 029-311-38 1 `\ 1� / / O$TA/3884+09-(YI) 5 .50'RT CHARTER PROPERTIES INC END PROP. SURFACE COURSE DB 23185 PG 651 TO TIE INTO EX. C&G� 4925 RIDGE RD OSTA. 201 TIE INTO EX. 2consultants 21+02.42 Markups by GAI Consultants, Inc. for Permitting Only 27. .4 192 188 184 1ao 176 72 168 164 OE � E UTE OE OE •�� EX. 6'/w ST vT Ss� S 0 760 LJJ L LJ 34+50 35+00 35+25 OE � E UTE OE OE •�� EX. 6'/w ST vT Ss� S 0 LJJ L LJ IT L i - - - � - - 35 00 E�istin Ridge Road i PROP. 8. MOND ISLAND Ln W w w N s w + Ln cr) Cn LJJ i Z F • ♦. e I- Q END PROP. HANDRAIL OSTA. 34+84-(ri) 57.50'R I _II O 029-313-Oi ANGIE 4RAYLOR DB 14774 PG 334 5306 WAVERLV 1 LYNNLN 029 313-02 s wnv[- Jrnn L= - 9 Ho a` kQob- s� S 2�z5 m LEFT EOP ELEV. 771.30 771.82 77235 773.20 773.87 774.72 775.60 776.48 777.36 778.04 778.68 RIGHT EOP ELEV. 766,54 771.52 F - I F - I F - I F - I 775.36 776.81 777.?7 778.30 778.61 796 792 788 784 780 776 772 768 764 760 779.20 779.70 780.17 780.62 781.05 781.50 781.96 78258 779.24 779.66 780.08 780.51 780.95 781.49 781.87 78241 78279 783.2 783.17 783.03 783.27 796 792 788 784 780 776 772 768 764 760 C Ido tJ a2 00 z0 00 35+25 35+50 38+00 36+50 37+00 57+50 38+00 38+50 39+00 39+50 40+00 40+50 C V MULTIPLE ONWERS 4'e I III Q I I I MULLTPLEt ONWERS m PROSPERITY VIEW DR'taPgnR I I III . III PROSPERITY VIEW DR = w O TOWNHOMES pp AG (} m II I I SAG TOWNHOMEB O I IIII A I p°`E 0 I 029-411-02 m..nK II I I CAROLINA STYLE rcmx nx mE FTq ! I III < I I EIGNT AFL PROPERTIES LLC V DB 18489 PG 553rrc p G �/ p E 4758 RIDGE RD ^� OE cb a/GNihT 1IryI� G fTl UTE UTE UTE N UTE UTE UTE n wun.c p� f / \ �/ f 0 p'1G pEAG < END 2'-6' CONC. CSG �� OGE SII 27..35+47:80 � 27.05' LT. - - - - - UT t+ pE0-bE > LLJ 1 GAP OT UT �p n _ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1 J , , / - - W uN` d o o (n - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - UE - -uE - UE - UE UE s -7A Lu 6TfT /TT/77777777/T-TTS/T7T/TT/T7T/T�/T7T/T W ss W a _ -SW 0 RIDGE RD. -(Yl)- Existing R27 ge Road ADJUST GV (% t G G - G G LLJ W o _ o o G 36 00 �- G 37 00 36 00 N70'59'53"E 39 00 40 00 (n O m U N 1381.01' PROP. 6' MONO. CONC. ISLAND STA. 37+ w 11.00'RT00'RT LC)STA.39+32.65(71) 0 9.1 STA. 38 32(71) J 1 6.00' RT. > PROP. PAINTED ISLAND. _ _ _100LF TAPER00'RT 26' WR 0 W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W ADJUST WV W W W W W W 27' _ - - �- - - - - P� 4- I S P H A L T- S N O A I D E e - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - C W W \ / F E E E E F E F E E. F G C.. F C c Q r+ - A O "+ Z / _ '. J o START P, DR. (n T 1 O 36+51.67 (Yl) 28.00' RT. 0) _ W p 7 L, W Fil - a ----- C^ .Fi-I to O � 064 ROP. 3.5' PLANTING IP \ \ I cnulrvc µc - - = S o (� d rO1 e e I ;L7 `^ I I I s os wnvE'LYlLt21H w I MCRgaoLoepiiass va°�. aNc�o cE�, C v r I , 1 JONNaiON MIL C I l L END OF ASPH. VADENING OST. I I I - - a I I rc unNiuNo 5335 T.UNs.oN uiu cr. 11 rsxv}s Pca14a Q %+ O AA /~ C�^ 35+70.36(77) 46.94'RT I s3zs .roNnsron MI ct ' s 3o -To, ulu I I 'I <e zwrvcs.nrvo cTl Q >_• /�/ N a TRANSITION PROP. 2'- kG z 5321 �oNNSTON MILL I. n� �53} a 5 I. 7 I a a Fai FrM TO EX. 2' V Y WRS z ' I oNmous L I I I? I l MN I ol'":� Awa � � ,� - M o Monday, September 30, 2013 3:08:59 PM EG FOR RIDGE RD. 1.93% 165% ------ EX. SSMH STA_ 35+8525(Y1 20.03'l -T RIM ELEV. 772.86" 2 %' INV. IN 762.39 INV. IN 762.52 INV. OUT 762.26' 3. % 3. %- - 3. % - - - EX. DI AIF RIM ELEV. 772.81' INV. OUT 768.41' OF 18" RCPO t.0 °° --------------- r - ------ ---- =- FT 152LF OF 8'PVC SS 00.45% n� ]:2n� 792 788 784 780 776 772 768 764 760 C Ido tJ a2 00 z0 00 35+25 35+50 38+00 36+50 37+00 57+50 38+00 38+50 39+00 39+50 40+00 40+50 C V MULTIPLE ONWERS 4'e I III Q I I I MULLTPLEt ONWERS m PROSPERITY VIEW DR'taPgnR I I III . III PROSPERITY VIEW DR = w O TOWNHOMES pp AG (} m II I I SAG TOWNHOMEB O I IIII A I p°`E 0 I 029-411-02 m..nK II I I CAROLINA STYLE rcmx nx mE FTq ! I III < I I EIGNT AFL PROPERTIES LLC V DB 18489 PG 553rrc p G �/ p E 4758 RIDGE RD ^� OE cb a/GNihT 1IryI� G fTl UTE UTE UTE N UTE UTE UTE n wun.c p� f / \ �/ f 0 p'1G pEAG < END 2'-6' CONC. CSG �� OGE SII 27..35+47:80 � 27.05' LT. - - - - - UT t+ pE0-bE > LLJ 1 GAP OT UT �p n _ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1 J , , / - - W uN` d o o (n - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - UE - -uE - UE - UE UE s -7A Lu 6TfT /TT/77777777/T-TTS/T7T/TT/T7T/T�/T7T/T W ss W a _ -SW 0 RIDGE RD. -(Yl)- Existing R27 ge Road ADJUST GV (% t G G - G G LLJ W o _ o o G 36 00 �- G 37 00 36 00 N70'59'53"E 39 00 40 00 (n O m U N 1381.01' PROP. 6' MONO. CONC. ISLAND STA. 37+ w 11.00'RT00'RT LC)STA.39+32.65(71) 0 9.1 STA. 38 32(71) J 1 6.00' RT. > PROP. PAINTED ISLAND. _ _ _100LF TAPER00'RT 26' WR 0 W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W ADJUST WV W W W W W W 27' _ - - �- - - - - P� 4- I S P H A L T- S N O A I D E e - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - C W W \ / F E E E E F E F E E. F G C.. F C c Q r+ - A O "+ Z / _ '. J o START P, DR. (n T 1 O 36+51.67 (Yl) 28.00' RT. 0) _ W p 7 L, W Fil - a ----- C^ .Fi-I to O � 064 ROP. 3.5' PLANTING IP \ \ I cnulrvc µc - - = S o (� d rO1 e e I ;L7 `^ I I I s os wnvE'LYlLt21H w I MCRgaoLoepiiass va°�. aNc�o cE�, C v r I , 1 JONNaiON MIL C I l L END OF ASPH. VADENING OST. I I I - - a I I rc unNiuNo 5335 T.UNs.oN uiu cr. 11 rsxv}s Pca14a Q %+ O AA /~ C�^ 35+70.36(77) 46.94'RT I s3zs .roNnsron MI ct ' s 3o -To, ulu I I 'I <e zwrvcs.nrvo cTl Q >_• /�/ N a TRANSITION PROP. 2'- kG z 5321 �oNNSTON MILL I. n� �53} a 5 I. 7 I a a Fai FrM TO EX. 2' V Y WRS z ' I oNmous L I I I? I l MN I ol'":� Awa � � ,� - M o Monday, September 30, 2013 3:08:59 PM LEFT EDP ELEV. 771.30 783.53 RIGHT EDP ELEV. 789.54 783.49 80C 79E 79' 78E 784 78C 77E 772 768 40+50 783.27 783.50 782.84 782.35 781.75 781.05 780.27 779.45 778.47 777.50 778.27 783.35 783.21 783.00 782.58 782.03 300 796 792 188 784 780 776 772 768 41+00 41+50 42+00 42+50 43+00 43+50 44+00 44+50 45+00 45+32.15 I 5 5 I \ 029 41C -99I III MULTIPLE ON WERE r��-, PROSPERITY VIEW DR III XIII TOWNHOMES I II r- III Ix REPLACE EX. ASPHALT 41+734j/'g,( T O I IIIN r ^'lll II TIE INTO EX. S/W AT DW AS NEEDED 41+64.98(ri) 029-411-03. I II O1 VIII I _ TRUDY 0. DANIEL (TRUSTEE U/T/D) 41+14.29 (ri) 38.11' LT. PROP. /W 37.89'LT DB 17922 PG 566 1 R �0��^� �� 4706 RIDGE RD I II I� r SII 2 oE�"� � e e - STA. 41+82.72 (ri) , e z 1..% E 28.30' LT. ''" p°.�° e 42(ri) �.•� ADJUST GV BY OTHER e ~ i cy I\ \\ 223WLT 34'LT of e e e e e e_ IF E "/ ` \ F F �Rt E F ,fir - E E T \ \� W T/7T/T�'T/T/T/�/� -JAI oE 30 OE .c -E I \ +30 30 30 " • 3� �� - - \ ��999 0 START OF WIDENING OSTA i - - 30 -T D' '+ w 41+14.19(71) 4.50'LT -- �---I- F F F F F F F16� F F F F Existing Ridge Roa� W 20:1 TAPER _ _G G G G - FX/5 0- - G N 41400 T/T T7T/T/TT7T/T/ 4T T/T/T�/T7 T/T/7T/T/T/74� T/T T/T / O6 G G G45 000 20:1 TAPER N: 595]41.39 ----- __ Z:��43+80.03(Yl) E:1470571.21 41' - _ _ nw a. uaam,.0_ _ - - - O 15.1 TAPER END PROP. .53'LTVADENIG 65TA J 37' � 5.53'LT Lr) 77: W W �PROP. PAINTED ISLAND �� . / END OF PROP. MILLING & ADJUST MH WD 1W -(Yl)- PROP. � )� RESURFACING STA 43+98.82(ri) PROP. 4' ASPHALT SHOULDER Q F c c F E F F F F U C G C _� PROP AT _ BACKRAMPF LLQ �7JRC%'ES",A`N �� END PROP. ASPH. SHOULDER AT Z STA. 41+99.21 (ri) 31.73' RT. -49 CARNED AUDREY A OAKESQ KINGPG 148 rte/ 4622 KINGSLAND CT I029-315-50 \ 029-315-09 / / WILLIAM 8, ALLEN AND SHARON R. ALLEN 1\ •� DWIGHT DAMS DB 23869 PG 469 / /i�� ■� 36 DB 1KING PG 718 I 4670 KINGPCCT 5937 WAVERLY LYNN LN a ` + 9ai consultants WO z� Markups by GAI Consultants, Inc. for Permitting Only CAU/ 00 0.648 -0.49X _ -1.7SX' -2.408 -3.14X �35gx _-4.70 �4. 9X - EC FOR RIDGE RD. m FF F F F F 300 796 792 188 784 780 776 772 768 41+00 41+50 42+00 42+50 43+00 43+50 44+00 44+50 45+00 45+32.15 I 5 5 I \ 029 41C -99I III MULTIPLE ON WERE r��-, PROSPERITY VIEW DR III XIII TOWNHOMES I II r- III Ix REPLACE EX. ASPHALT 41+734j/'g,( T O I IIIN r ^'lll II TIE INTO EX. S/W AT DW AS NEEDED 41+64.98(ri) 029-411-03. I II O1 VIII I _ TRUDY 0. DANIEL (TRUSTEE U/T/D) 41+14.29 (ri) 38.11' LT. PROP. /W 37.89'LT DB 17922 PG 566 1 R �0��^� �� 4706 RIDGE RD I II I� r SII 2 oE�"� � e e - STA. 41+82.72 (ri) , e z 1..% E 28.30' LT. ''" p°.�° e 42(ri) �.•� ADJUST GV BY OTHER e ~ i cy I\ \\ 223WLT 34'LT of e e e e e e_ IF E "/ ` \ F F �Rt E F ,fir - E E T \ \� W T/7T/T�'T/T/T/�/� -JAI oE 30 OE .c -E I \ +30 30 30 " • 3� �� - - \ ��999 0 START OF WIDENING OSTA i - - 30 -T D' '+ w 41+14.19(71) 4.50'LT -- �---I- F F F F F F F16� F F F F Existing Ridge Roa� W 20:1 TAPER _ _G G G G - FX/5 0- - G N 41400 T/T T7T/T/TT7T/T/ 4T T/T/T�/T7 T/T/7T/T/T/74� T/T T/T / O6 G G G45 000 20:1 TAPER N: 595]41.39 ----- __ Z:��43+80.03(Yl) E:1470571.21 41' - _ _ nw a. uaam,.0_ _ - - - O 15.1 TAPER END PROP. .53'LTVADENIG 65TA J 37' � 5.53'LT Lr) 77: W W �PROP. PAINTED ISLAND �� . / END OF PROP. MILLING & ADJUST MH WD 1W -(Yl)- PROP. � )� RESURFACING STA 43+98.82(ri) PROP. 4' ASPHALT SHOULDER Q F c c F E F F F F U C G C _� PROP AT _ BACKRAMPF LLQ �7JRC%'ES",A`N �� END PROP. ASPH. SHOULDER AT Z STA. 41+99.21 (ri) 31.73' RT. -49 CARNED AUDREY A OAKESQ KINGPG 148 rte/ 4622 KINGSLAND CT I029-315-50 \ 029-315-09 / / WILLIAM 8, ALLEN AND SHARON R. ALLEN 1\ •� DWIGHT DAMS DB 23869 PG 469 / /i�� ■� 36 DB 1KING PG 718 I 4670 KINGPCCT 5937 WAVERLY LYNN LN a ` + 9ai consultants WO z� Markups by GAI Consultants, Inc. for Permitting Only JLLLL!j Monday, September 30, 2013 3:02:53 PM �z w� a N M U064 a ` + WO z� CAU/ 00 JLLLL!j Monday, September 30, 2013 3:02:53 PM APPENDIX G Erosion Control Plan Sheets ECP1 and ECP2 GENERAL NOTES: PRG UNDER EMBANKMENT SHALL BE CLEARED. GR VEGETATION AND ROT MATERIAL THE BASIN AREA SHALL BE CLEARED. 2. HE FILL MATERIAL FOR THE EMBANKMENT SHALL BE FREE OF BOMB OR OTHER WOOCYYEGETANON AS WELL AS OVERSIZED STONES ROCKS, OMPACTEO BY TRAVERSING WITH EQUIPMENT WHILE BEING RUCTED. CONSTRSPILLWAYS SHOULDFED HOT BE CONSTRUCTT HROUGH ISECTAL LL IONS. LC SPILLWAYS SHOULD BE LINED AND/OR PPRAPPED. 3. N MHE H SEDIMENT HAS ACCUMULATED iO DEPSHOWN ON STANDARD. HALL1. TED IN AG IINNCHANMANNER THAT IT WILL NOT ERODE. TIE 11 IRE IEAS 5. CONSHUCPON O,EPATIONESHALLABE GPRRIED OUT AIND HAA MANNER THAT EROSION AND WATER. POLL -H IS MNIMIZED. ALL CUT AND FILL SLOPES SHALL BE 2:1 OR RATTER, SUNLESS CERTIRED BY REGISTERED GEOIECHICAL ENGINEER, SEDIKILI BASIN EMBANKMENTS SHOULD DE PROVIDED WITH EROSION CONTROL AND STABILIZATION. S SALSOTORAGE AREA TED AY SUCHOTSART EFl FILTER ANDIN MY MANIDED FLOW MUNINUM WATER AND IS SEDIMENTUME ARERONNUIREMENT IS OPPOST E ENDS ON THETHE �LOINGEROULD ISI N DMENBEONE, HAT E OF N THE LENGTH OF THE STONE OUT- (SPILLWAY) IS TO BE BASED ON A 10 - STORM. 10. WHENEVER TOPOGRAPHY ALLOWS, HE BASIN LENGTH SHOULD BE TWICE (2X) HE BASIN WIDTH, i0 ALLOW FOR SENUNG. BAFFLES.SHALL BE INSTALLED IN ALL BASINS. II. CLEANOUT STAKES SHALL BE PLACED IN ALL SEDIMENT BASINS AT THE LOW POINT IN THE &SIN. THE STAKES SHALL BE MARKED SHOWING LEPNOLT POIPLACED 12. SAFETY FENC NGA3' HIGH SHOULD D AROUND ALL SEDIMENT BASINS, 13. FOR DESIGN OF SEDIMENT BASINS. REFER TO THE NORTH CAEOUNA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES, AND SED, AENT RIL 4. R SLOPS GREATER THAN 10' IN LENGTH AND PROTECT BY SILT F CE AT H TOE OF E SLOPE, SLOPE TERRACING WILL BE REQUIRED. 15. E BE ON SEDMENT BAS NS SHALL BE SEEDED ONCE EPHIL GRADEHASBEEN REACHED, E SILTPENCEMAY BE REMOVED F PERMSSON HAS BEEN GRANTED BY HE Cltt LAND D-LOPMENT INSPECTOR AFTER THE GRASS HAS GERMINATED AND STABLE GROUND HAS BEEN ILPHED IS. $.ONE AND WEE SADKN USED WITH SILT FENCE WHENEVER SLT FEN CE AT THEIS OF A SLOPE >IV VERT OR ALONG CHANNEL OR WATER COURSE WHERE 5 F BUFFER • CITY OF CHARLOTTE � LAND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS GENERAL NOTES -SEDIMENT BASINS G7LIH IS INCLUDES CHARLOTTE ETJ 30.03B 3 GENERAL NOTES DEPRESSID CEM sEVENLTAROUNOTHEMIDDLE, All III G A LEr. PERIMETER OF THE INLET, A MAAI OF , FEET APART FMOWARE CLOT UP. TH RE OER THE 00 G= FOR ANCHORING IS ONE IONp215LOPEO ATHA EIGHTTONCE THE "NOR"' NO OF 16 NCUOT #5 WASHR ED GE HARDWARE MESH OPENINGS) CITY OF MUUTTE I HARDWARE CLOTH AND GRAVEL _IghLIND• DIYELOPIIENT STANDARDS INLET PROTECTION GTED. -T STEEL POST WOMEN ITER FAIR FILTER FABRIC R -- _ WJJ=11 �J=11� �1=111L=L �JIL-ILL=ILLLI JILL=[IN I� JILL =_-_ IIIIII �I� F II�JII-III - II-III=IIGIII-III. VIII 1011=III-HIL-11111=III-II -III 1111=11 L- m H T��II=III II-II=11 �III�II-III=IIHII-X�11=[rlI IS�IIII II IS�I-III=IIE�I�� HII=[EI' IN_ 3�1 rll maT�iT=r '�II�ITI�T�I�EIII: �Tlwll` GENERAL NOTES: 1. WOVEN FILTER FABRIC BE USED WHERE SILT FENCE IS TO REMAIN FOR A PERIOD OF MORE THAN ODIG 2. STEEL POSTS SHALL BE 5'-0' IN HEIGHT AND BE OF HE SELF -FASTENER ANGLE STEEL TYPE. 3. TURN SILT FENCE UP SLOPE AT ENDS, 4. ORAUGE SAO FENCE REOU�IREEDD AT BACK OF SILT NCE WHEN GRADING IS ADJACENT S OR WERANDS FER REF UVIRO N E .THEM LO GE RESERVED FOR VSUAL IDEM FlCATIONUOF ENV RONMENrALLY SE 5 E AREAS. 5, DRAINAGE AREA CA R THAN 1/4 ACRE PER 100 FT OF FENCE 6. SLOPE LENGTHS C NOT GEED CRIERA SHOWN IN TABLE 6 62A NORTH CAROLINA EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PHANN NG AND DESIGN MANUAL T DO T- SEDIMENT AREAS TNS OF CONCENTRATED FFENCE ACROSS STREAMS, DITCHES, WATERWAYS OR OTHER • CITY OF CHARLOTTE card LAND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS CH.ABL0 m INCLUDES CHARLOTTE ETJ MAINTENANCE NOTES: 1. FILTER BARRIERS SHALL BE INSPECTED BY THE FINANCIALLY RESPONSIBLE PARTY OR HIS AGENT IMMEDIATELY AFTER EACH RAINFALL AND AT LEAST DAILY DURING PROLONGED RAINFALL ANY REPAIRS NEEDED SHALL BE MADE IMMEDIATELY. 2 SHOULD THE F BRC OE POSE 0R BECOME NEFFEME PRIOR TO THE END IF HE HE BARRIER STILL 5 NECESSARY THE FABRIC SHALL BE RE CED PROMPTLY 3 BEDMENT DEPOSITS SHOULD BE REMOVED WHEN DEPOSITS REACH APPROX, HALE HE HEIGHT OF THE BARRIER, ANY SEDIMENT DEPOSITS REMAN NG IN PLACE AFTER THE 1111 FEN11 11 EXISTING GRADE. PR"AREDRAND SEEDED. EIGNEI IN -B D SSED i0 CONFORM i0 HE TEMPORARY SILT FENCE GENTLE SLOPES STEEP SLOPES TO SEEDING MIXTURE BO Ibe/Dere of toll fesue T00 lbs/acre tall fescue 30 lbs/acre Sericeo legust spedeza (UnscaWR,d after Au15) 10 lbs/ace Kobe lespedeza 2. DISTURBED AREA = 5.53 ACRES FALL August 25 - October FALL: August 25 - October 15 3. SOIL TYPES: CECIL SANDY CLAY LOAM, MECKLENBURG FINE SANDY LOAM, HELENA SANDY LOAM Late Winter. February 15 - April 15 Lata winter, February 15 - Aprll 15 SEEDING To extend spring seeding into June, add To extend spring Beetling into June, add DATES 15 lbs/acre hulled Bermudagrass 15 lbs/acre hulled Bermudagrass PERMANENT VEGETATIVE EROSION CONTROL MEASURES) WITHIN THE REQUIRED TIME FRAME: OF --ding of Kobe lespedeza over fall-s»eded Overseeding of Kobe lespedeza over fall -seeded PERIMETER DIKES, SWALES, DITCHES AND SLOPES 7 DAYS tall fescue ie very effective, tall fescue is very effective. SEEDING Apply lime and fertilizer per soil tests. or 4000 Apply lime and fertilizer per soil tests, or 4000 AMENDMENTS : lbs/acre limestone and 1000 lbs/acre 10-10-10 fertilizer. lbs/acre limestone dad 1000 lbs/acre 10-10-10 fertilizer. NOTE 1 Ground Cover - PTa1 t ve must be established oaall d sturbed -, w th n 21 calendar dogs after land -t-mg g. pctivty a completed arhae tempororly ce sed NOTE 2 Graded slopes and fills- Protective cover must be established sD all graded slopes a,d fills Wilhlo 21 calendar days after a phase of grading is completed or has temporarily ceased. lm1• ND CITY OF CHARLOTTE LADEVELOPMENT STANDARDS SEEDING SCHEDULE ©fAR[_0U r_ INCLUDES CRAW DM 6Pf 30.17A SECTION NOTES 1. INLET MAINTENANCE SHALL BE DOCUMENTED IN PROJECT LOG BOOK. 2. FILTER TYPES SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE CITY INSPECTOR PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. 3. FILTER BAGS MAY BE REMOVED WHEN SITE IS STABILIZED AT THE DIRECTION OF THE ENGINEER. 4. FILTER BAGS SHALL BE REMOVED PRIOR TO STREET ACCEPTANCE. 5. FILTER BAGS SHALL BE CLEANED OR REPLACED ON A REGULAR BASIS (NOT BE MORE THAN HALF FULL AT ANY TIME). 6. FILTER BAGS SHALL NOT BE ALLOWED IN EXISTING CITY OR ROOST ROADS. GRATE REMOVAL FROM NLET FILTER HAG EFLECTOR DUMP LOOPS CpiCH BASHN CURET INSTAI I ATION • CITY OF CHARLOTTE KYh LAND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS CATCH BASIN INLET PROTECTION CIIAHIATI'F_ HICLUDBS CHARLOTTE 8Td 11vvI MALLARD WATERSHEDS CLASS C, INDEX #11-137-9 MAINTENANCE PLAN 1. ALL TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES WILL BE INSTALLED AS NOTED 2. DISTURBED AREA = 5.53 ACRES ON THE CLDSM DETAILS FOR EROSION CONTROL AND THE EROSION CONTROL PLANS. 3. SOIL TYPES: CECIL SANDY CLAY LOAM, MECKLENBURG FINE SANDY LOAM, HELENA SANDY LOAM 2. TRAPPED SEDIMENT SHALL BE PROMPTLY REMOVED FROM THE EROSION CONTROL MEASURES AND DISPOSED OF. 4. STABILIZATION IS THE BEST FORM OF EROSION CONTROL. ALL DISTURBED AREAS WILL BE STABILIZED WITH THE APPROPRIATE 3. ALL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES MUST BE INSPECTED WEEKLY AND AFTER RAINFALL EVENTS. PERMANENT VEGETATIVE EROSION CONTROL MEASURES) WITHIN THE REQUIRED TIME FRAME: NEEDED REPAIRS MUST BE MADE IMMEDIATELY. PERIMETER DIKES, SWALES, DITCHES AND SLOPES 7 DAYS HIGH QUALITY WATER ZONES 7 DAYS SLOPES STEEPER THAN 3:1 7 DAYS VEGETATIVE PLAN SLOPES GREATER THAN SOFT IN LENGTH REGARDLESS OF SLOPE 7 DAYS 1. ALL DISTURBED AREAS WILL BE STABILIZED BY PERMANENTLY VEGETATING WITH SEED AND MULCH AS SLOPES 3:1 OR FLATTER AND LESS THAN SOFT IN LENGTH 14 DAYS RECOMMENDED BY THE PERMANENT SEEDING SPECIFICATIONS DUE TO THE RESTRAINTS ON THE LENGTH ALL OTHER AREAS WITH SLOPES FLATTER THAN 4:1 14 DAYS OF IMPROVEMENTS AND/OR DURATION OF EXPOSED DISTURBED AREA. 5. ANY GRADING BEYOND THE CONSTRUCTION LIMITS SHOWN ON THE PLANS IS A VIOLATION OF THE NORTH CAROLINA EROSION 2. TO PROMOTE A DENSE VEGETATIVE COVER IN AREAS WHERE RUNOFF CONCENTRATES OR IN AREAS CONTROL ORDINANCE AND IS SUBJECT TO A FINE, WHERE VEGETATION IS HARD TO ESTABLISH, A MATTING FOR EROSION CONTROL SHALL BE USED, THE MATTING TO BE USED WILL BE A MATTING THAT CONSISTS OF 70% STRAW AND 30% COCONUT AND BE 6. NO ON-SITE BURIAL OF VEGETATION OR CONSTRUCTION DEBRIS WILL BE PERMITTED. BACKED (OR APPROVED EQUAL). THE MATTING FOR EROSION CONTROL WILL BE CONSTRUCTED AS PART OF THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS AND SHALL ALSO SERVE FOR VEGETATIVE STABILIZATION PURPOSES. 7. ADDITIONAL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES MAY BE REQUIRED IN THE FIELD BY THE CONSTRUCTION INSPECTOR. 8. ALL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES MUST BE INSPECTED WEEKLY AND AFTER RAINFALL EVENTS. NEEDED REPAIRS CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE MUST BE MADE IMMEDIATELY. 1. OBTAIN PLAN APPROVAL AND OTHER APPLICABLE PERMITS. 9. REFER TO THE CONSTRUCTION PLANS, PROFILES, AND DETAILS FOR SPECIFIC DESIGN INFORMATION FOR THE ROADWAY AND 2. HOLD PRE -CONSTRUCTION CONFERENCE AT LEAST ONE WEEK PRIOR TO BEGINNING CONSTRUCTION.. DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS. 3. FLAG THE CONSTRUCTION LIMITS AND INSTALL TREE PROTECTION. 10. INLET PROTECTION IS REQUIRED. FOR ALL INLETS LOCATED IN THE WORKING AREA AND IS REQUIRED FOR ALL PHASES OF THE PROJECT UNTIL THE DISTURBED AREA IS FULLY STABILIZED. 4. ALL DITCH SECTIONS SHALL BE STABILIZED FOR EROSION CONTROL MEASURES 11. WHEN PLACING EXCAVATED SOIL ON PAVEMENT, FIRST COVER PAVEMENT WITH TARP, SAND, OR SCREENINGS. 5. INSTALL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES REQUIRED FOR THE PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES, 12. THE MAXIMUM LINEAR FEET OF DITCH WORK THAT CAN BE EXCAVATED BEFORE REQUIRED STABILIZATION IS 200 LF. 6. CONSTRUCT THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS AS SHOWN ON THE PLANS AND AS NOTED IN THE CONSTRUCTION PHASING LISTED ON SHEET TCP1. 13. INSTALL STORM DRAINAGE AND OTHER PERMANENTLY STABILIZED DITCHES AND DRIVEWAY PIPES THAT WILL CONVEY SURFACE WATER DOWNSTREAM OF THE SITE, FIRST. 7. DISTURBANCE AREAS SHALL BE LIMITED TO ONE DRAINAGE AREA AT A TIME WHENEVER POSSIBLE. 14. ALL STOCKPILE AREAS DEEMED NECESSARY BY THE CONTRACTOR WILL BE REQUIRED TO HAVE EROSION CONTROL B. AFTER EACH WORKDAY, PROTECT ROADWAY BASE WITH ABC OR BY COMPACTION. MEASURES SURROUNDING THE AREA, THE STOCKPILE AREAS MAY ONLY BE LOCATED WITHIN THE CONSTRUCTION LIMITS. APPROPRIATE EROSION CONTROL MEASURES CONSIST OF TEMPORARY SILT FENCE, TEMPORARY DIVERSION DITCH, SEDIMENT 9, INSPECT THE EROSION CONTROL MEASURES WEEKLY AND AFTER EVERY RAINFALL. MAKE ANY TRAP, ETC. NEEDED REPAIRS. 15. THE CONTRACTOR IS REQUIRED TO PREVENT EROSION AND SEDIMENT FROM DEPOSITION ON LOCAL ROADS BY PROVIDING 10, ONCE THE ENTIRE DRAINAGE AREA IS PERMANENTLY STABILIZED, REMOVE ALL TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE/EXITS. REFER TO CLDSM 30.11A - STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE. EROSION CONTROL MEASURES. EROSION CONTROL NOTES 00 0 0 RG LU T O Tuesday, October 01, 2013 2:42:03 PM • I O \ IIIII'llllll Ilio qll / I� / I / (IIIIIIIIII II Ip IIII � � / / I I l�lllll � I'll 1 h+ r l IIIIIIIIIII illi � I // AI/Illlll/I / }v'✓ I\ � ��/ /(911/lam _ �I�' _:�l//il i -_��1 -=-c =�v'�= = Vl -- �_IS i V� / __--___ __ vrte ' /_ "�'�`#�--- � � -ala= — � /�% a/ /a� + LLI cr / �� Y� � / / % I (III N/' / /-'� / / I Ill 1 // /�/%i/�/"'i' / ' /--• � m { / / / I 1\♦ \\ \ \`Ill I j I` % /� //j /% ji`�i/i%�/% /� �;,; _ \VA\�\�\\ / \\ "X7 MATCH LINE STA.18+65(-L1-) SEE BELOW FOR RIDGE RD (-Y1-) Y 1 �/ 1111 - 77' D. / / / / i / / / o LIj o t Q 2 o w � / In 3 Z __ _ _ _ _ LLj __ i LLI LLI I I r' /� \ \ / \ 1" = ' / / I I I� \\\Z \ :�'\11� -- •�� I I � IIT \\ j j j ! ! I ! { I d o I I I I / Av / / I I• � // �\ /--� 111111 p1 11 11 � `� / I�-v /(I I V � I j } I � � {. I I I I I p /// �/� /�'/ \ // 11 II II{1II � \I/ I I \/ I✓, I \ I j j j I i j i i i o 0 I USE EROSION CONTROL WHEN RING AS NEEDED > / / / / 1 \\� LEGEND o o p "o +a 4� I u, SILT FENCE -- 4,.—'-°_--a•�=--"_-I, --\ –T — CLDSM 30.06A g g- STORM INLET SEDIMENT TRAP ■ ww / / / / i j CLDSM 30.15 FOR CB zw /z OI HEN REGRADING DITCH _-- _ �� \\\.\ 'C \`�I I %t /11 1661 O Z a a � O rx a W N N NU °U Tuesday, October 01, 2013 2:34:39 PM APPENDIX H Schweinitz's Sunflower Assessment Report • gai consultants transforming ideas into reality. November 14, 2013 Mr. Bryan Tompkins US Fish and Wildlife Service 160 Zillicoa Street Asheville, North Carolina 28801 RE: Federally Endangered Species-specific Survey: Schweinitz's Sunflower Charlotte -Mecklenburg Storm Water Services Prosperity Ridge Road Enhancement Project Charlotte, Mecklenburg County, North Carolina Dear Mr. Tompkins: GAI Consultants (GAI), retained by Charlotte -Mecklenburg Storm Water Services (CMSWS), conducted a protected species-specific survey for the Prosperity Ridge Road Enhancement Project (Project). The proposed Project is located in north Charlotte, Mecklenburg County, North Carolina, approximately 0.3 miles east of the intersection of Prosperity Church Road and Ridge Road. See figures 1 and 2 in Attachment A. The survey was specific to the Schweinitz's sunflower (Helianthus schweinitzii), federally listed as endangered on May 7, 1991 (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service [FWS] 1991). The Schweinitz's sunflower is endemic to the piedmont of North Carolina and South Carolina. Known extant populations are within an approximate 60 -mile radius of Charlotte, North Carolina'. The impetus for this investigation arose from a need to assess the presence or absence of the Schweinitz's sunflower within the Project footprint. Schweinitz's sunflower is a perennial herb with a single stem that grows up to approximately 6.5 feet in height. It has thickened roots that are used by the plant to store starch. The stem is purplish in color, and the upper third bears secondary branches at 45 -degree angles. The leaves are arranged in pairs on the lower part of the stem but usually occur singly (or alternate) on the upper parts. Leaves are attached to the stem at right angles, and the tips of the leaves tend to droop. The leaves are thick and stiff, with a rough upper surface. The upper leaf surfaces have broad spiny hairs that are directed toward the tip and soft white hairs cover the underside. The petals of the flowers are yellow and bloom from late August until frost. Habitats for Schweinitz's sunflower include areas in full to partial sun and are found in natural forest openings, grasslands, roadsides, and utility corridors. It occurs in a variety of soil series that vary over the course of the year from wet to very dry, including Badin, Cecil, Cid, Enon, Gaston, Georgeville, Iredell, Mecklenburg, Misenheimer, Secrest, Tatum, Uwharrie, and Zion, among others. It is generally found growing on shallow sandy soils with high gravel content; shallow, poor, clayey hardpans; or shallow rocky soils, especially those derived from mafic rocks. The Project site soils are categorized as Helena sandy loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes (HeB), and is allied to Enon, Iredell and Mecklenburg series. The HeB is moderately well -drained and classified as prime farmland making it less favorable for the Schweinitz's sunflower. Figure 3 in Attachment A depicts the soil classes for the Project site and surrounding areas. The species-specific survey was conducted within the approximate 1.50 -acre non -forested portion of the study area that encompassed the proposed land disturbance of 0.83 acres for the Project. Potential habitat (an approximate 0.20 -acre area) for the Schweinitz's sunflower is located at the terminus of the existing paved Prosperity Ridge Road "split" near an approximate 0.15 -acre detention pond. The study area surveyed is depicted on figure 4 in Attachment A. A pedestrian survey was conducted within the FWS optimal survey window on October 24, 2013. Prior to the survey, the biologist, Mr. Anthony Nardo, ' FWS. April 22, 1994. Schweinitz's Sunflower Recovery Plan. Atlanta, Georgia. 35 pp. gai consultants transforming ideas into reality® Charlotte Mecklenburg Storm Water Services Prosperity Ridge Road Enhancement Project Charlotte, Mecklenburg County, North Carolina Project #: 8110437.08 Page 2 of 3 visited a known population of the sunflower to have a fresh visual of the plant to be surveyed. The survey for the sunflower consisted of a search for purple stemmed, 3-4 feet tall plant having long slender dark green leaves with a soft velvet underside and rough upper surface, and comparatively small heads of yellow flowers. The Schweinitz's sunflower was not observed during the site investigation in the project study area. In fact no specimens of the genus Helianthus were found in the project area. The Project study area consisted of mowed and maintained landscape; open fields; a stream and wetlands; and a detention pond. Vegetation observed for these land covers and features are described below: + Mowed and maintained landscaped areas are dominated by fescue (Festuca sp.), and red maple (Acer rubrum); + Non -maintained open field areas adjacent to the existing roadway are dominated by goldenrod (Solidago sp.), ragweed (Ambrosia artemisiifolia), blackberry (Rubus sp.), lespedeza (Lespedeza cuneata), bluestem (Andropogon Sp.) and fennel (Foenicu/um vu/gare). Sapling species observed include sweetgum (Liquidambar styraciflua) and eastern baccharis (Baccharis halimifolia); + Stream and wetlands are dominated by common rush (Juncus effusus), seedbox (Ludwigia alternifolia), cattail (Typha latifolia), and a sedge species (Carex sp.). Sapling species observed include hazel alder (A/nus serrulata), cottonwood (Popu/us deltoids), sweetgum, and red maple; and + Detention Pond impoundment is dominated by lespedeza, fennel, and bluestem. Representative photographs are in Attachment B. It is GAI's opinion that the proposed CMSWS Prosperity Ridge Road Enhancement Project will have "no effect" on the Schweinitz's sunflower due to the following: 1. No Schweinitz's sunflower were observed in the Project study area; 2. Landscape adjacent to residences are frequently mowed; 3. Open fields contain dense undergrowth that would provide excessive competition for the Schweinitz's sunflower; and 4. The Schweinitz's sunflower sensitivity to shade limits it to small open areas within the Project footprint that are sparsely vegetated. If you have any questions regarding the results of this survey, please contact me at (412) 925-1205 or via email at a.nardo@gaiconsultants.com. Sincerely, GAI Consultants Anthony "Tony" Nardo Project Environmental Specialist Attachments: A — Figures 1 - 4 B - Photographs c. Isaac Hinson, CMSWS Melvin'M Stroble, Sr., REM, CMSCI Senior Environmental Manager/Charlotte Office Lead gai consultants transforming ideas into reality® ATTACHMENT A Figure 1: Project Location Map Figure 2: USGS Topographic Map Figure 3: USDA Soil Survey Map Figure 4: Project Survey Boundary Aerial Map gai consultants transforming ideas into reality, Ill a 71 �t Y'. t r� . �r _ , J _ .!" `f+Ia•+ belt'{ -'rk Prosperity Ridge Road 4 ars Interstate 77 J, Eastfield Road PROJECT LOCATION; F 35.374229°N, -80.780368°W r " - .1-W l _ Statesville Road Ridge Road ` j it ' } w: ]] r ' 6 REFERENCE: USGS 7.5';� QUADRANGLE: DERITA, NORTH CAROLINA LEGEND FIGURE 1 PROJECT LOCATION PROJECT LOCATION MAP PROSPERITY RIDGE ROAD CONNECTION PROJECT gai consultants CHARLOTTE MECKLENBURG STORMWATER SERVICES MECKLENBURG COUNTY, 0 2,500 5,000 10,000 DRAWN BY: RGJ DATE: 11/29/2011 Nf)RTH CARni INA Feet CHECKED: APPROVED: -�, � fes': �r � • ;� ` �` ti�� „�''°F PROJECT LOCATION R v s�'ztY 35.374229°N, —80.7803681W' .far - 1 ` "'lam- -•, - ... Old Ridge Road %S o , e . l ;Jonah,erffie 17em cr r REFERENCE: USGS 7.5' QUADRANGLE: DERITA, NORTH CAROLINA' LEGEND FIGURE 2 PROJECT LOCATION USGS TOPO MAP PROSPERITY RIDGE ROAD CONNECTION PROJECT gai consultants CHARLOTTE MECKLENBURG STORMWATER SERVICES MECKLENBURG COUNTY, 0 1,000 2,000 4,000 DRAWN BY: RGJ DATE: 11/29/2011 Nf)RTH CARni INA Feet CHECKED: APPROVED: ATTACHMENT B Project Study Area Photographs gai consultants transforming ideas into reality, mamma Prosperity Ridge Road Extension Project Schweinitz's Sunflower Survey i f Photograph 3. View of field area looking east Photograph 4. View of stream and wetland area gai consultants Prosperity Ridge Road Extension Project Schweinitz's Sunflower Survey Photograph 5. View of detention basin gai consultants INDEX OF SHEETS CoverSheet....................................................................................... 1 General Notes and Details......................................................... 2-2A TypicalSection............................................................................3-3A Storm Drainage Summary, Plan Sheets & Details ......... SDI -SD -6 Plan& Profile.............................................................................. 7-11 Traffic Control Plan ...................................................... TCP1-TCP2 Pavement Marking Plan............................................................ PM1 Erosion Control Plan ......................................................... EC1-EC2 UBO.......................................................................................... UB01 CrossSections........................................................................ X1 -X10 PROJECT SITE TOTAL SHEETS 28 X7TP-tNTT'V M A p Begin Project Sta. 10+00.00 -Ll- Start Project Stall. 30+00.00 -Yl- PLANS PREPARED BY: 600 East Fourth Street BINGCharlotte, North Carolina 28202 Phone: (704) 336-2291 FOR CHARLOTTE Fax: (704) 336-6586 CITY OF CHARLOTTE ENGINEERING & PROPERTY MANAGEMENT PLANNING & DESIGN GROUP End Project Stall. 21+02.42 -Ll- CHARLOTTES., ENGINEERING &PROPERTY MANAGEMENT Construction Plans of Proposed PROSPERITY RIDGE RD. CONNECTION off; h \ \ LOCATION MAP NTS 512-10-043 Project Features: Curb & Gutter Sidewalk Storm Drainage Grading Pavement Markings Asphalt Pavement GRAPHIC SCALES 0 Plan View ................. PE SEAL PRELIMINARY Do Not Use For Construction Record Drawings End Project Stall. 45+32.15 -Yl- RECOMMENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION Contract Administration Construction Administration Landscape Management Engineering Services Utility Coordinator CDOT - Design 20 40 60 Horz. Profile ............ CDOT - Implementation 4 8 12 CONVENTIONAL SIGNS Proposed Property Line .................................. — — — — — Existing Property Line ................................... Maintained as R/W Line ................................ ExistingStructures ......................................... Railroad Tracks .............................................. Proposed Edge of Pavement .......................... Fence................................................................ X SlopeStake Line ............................................. C F Temporary Construction Easement ............. e e Sidewalk/Utility Easement ............................ SUE SUE Storm Drainage Easement ............................ sDE SDE - Existing Gas Line ........................................... c c Existing Water Line ....................................... W W Existing Sanitary Sewer ................................ ss ss Existing Underground Telecommunications UT UT Existing Underground Electric ..................... UE UE Existing Overhead Electric ........................... of of Existing Storm Drainage ............................... — - - - - Proposed Storm Drainage ............................. Existing Tree ° WM ExistingWater Meter............................................................................. ❑ ExistingWater Valve............................................................................. WV >a ExistingGas Valve................................................................................. e Existing Sanitary Sewer Manhole......................................................... C ProposedSanitary Sewer Manhole....................................................... Existing Storm Drain Manhole.............................................................� Proposed Storm Drain Manhole........................................................... Existing Telephone Manhole................................................................. , Proposed Telephone Manhole T Existing Electric Manhole Proposed Electric ManholeE ................................................................... ExistingCatch Basin.............................................................................. ProposedCatch Basin............................................................................ ExistingLight Pole.................................................................................� ProposedLight Pole................................................................................ ExistingUtility Pole.................................................................................a GuyWire............................................................................................ —< ProposedUtility Pole.............................................................................. .W IronPin.................................................................................................... C� ExistingFire Hydrant............................................................................ ProposedFire Hydrant.......................................................................... ExistingDrop Inlet.................................................................................. 0 ProposedDrop Inlet................................................................................ AccessibleRamp................................................................................... wcR TreeProtection............................................................................. ProposedGuardrail................................................................... SiltFence..................................................................................... Proposed Curb & Gutter, Conc. Drive, Sidewalk ................... ProposedAsphalt Pavement........................................................ Proposed Rip Rap Ditch.............................................................. Proposed Gravel ........................................ Proposed Pavement Removal .................. Proposed Sidewalk Bridging Tree Roots • ax CHARLOTTE_ ENGINEERING & PROPERTY MANAGEMENT Bid Set No. PROJECT LENGTH = 0.2 MILES Vert. Profile CMU s to is Planning APPROVED 2012 STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS Cross Section ........... Storm Water Services CITY ENGINEER DATE Tuesday, October 01, 2013 3:26:58 PM GENERAL NOTES PROPOSED CURB ELEVATIONS: THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SET AND ADJUST PROPOSED CURB ELEVATIONS AS NECESSARY TO ENSURE PROPER LONGITUDINAL GRADE FOR DRAINAGE. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL RETAIN EXISTING PAVEMENT, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. DRIVEWAYS AND SIDEWALKS: PROPOSED DRIVEWAY ENTRANCE DIMENSIONS ARE FROM EXPANSION JOINT TO EXPANSION JOINT. MATCH REPLACEMENT MATERIALS TO THE EXISTING SURFACE ACCORDINGLY: o CONCRETE - SIX INCH PORTLAND CEMENT CONCRETE (3600 PSI). o ASPHALT - (COMMERCIAL) TWO INCH SF9.5B COURSE AND FOUR INCH 119.013 INTERMEDIATE COURSE. (RESIDENTAE) TWO INCH SF9.5B COURSE AND FOUR INCH AGGREGATE BASE (ABC) COURSE. o GRAVEL SIX INCH INCIDENTAL STONE SIDEWALK SHALL BE FOUR INCHES THICK, AND SIX INCHES THICK AT DRIVEWAY CROSSINGS, PER CITY STD. NO. 10.22. DRAINAGE STRUCTURES: GRADES, ELEVATIONS AND LOOATIOHS SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE, AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER, THEY MAY BE ADJUSTED TO ACCOMMODATE UNFORESEEN CONDITIONS. STATIONS, OFFSETS AND ELEVATIONS REFER TO THE CENTER OF DROP INLETS, MANHOLES AND JUNCTION BOXES, AND THE MIDPOINT OF THE LIP FOR CATCH BASINS. ALL PIPES SHALL BE RCP CLASS III, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. WEEPHOLES ARE TO BE CONSTRUCTED IN ALL DRAINAGE STRUCTURES, A MINIMUM OF 1 WEEPHOLE PER STRUCTURE. WEEPHOLES ARE TO BE CONSTRUCTED IN THE BOTTOM 113 OF STRUCTURE AND COVERED ON THE OUTSIDE OF THE STRUCTURE BY A BAG MADE OF FILTER FABRIC AND FILLED W/#78 STONE. THERE WILL BE NO SEPARATE PAYMENT FOR THIS WORK. UTILITIES: UTILITIES ARE ILLUSTRATED FOR INFORMATION PURPOSES ONLY. THE CITY WILL NOT BE HELD RESPONSIBLE FOR THE ACCURACY OF UTILITY LOCATIONS, SIZES, DEPTHS, OR FOR COMPLETENESS OF UTILITY INFORMATION. PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY AND MEET WITH ALL UTILITY OWNERS, THE CITY UTILITY COORDINATOR AND CITY INSPECTOR WHOSE FACILITIES WILL BE AFFECTED TO DETERMINE UTILITY LOCATIONS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT ALL UTILITIES FROM DAMAGE CAUSED BY HIS OPERATIONS OR THOSE OF HIS AGENTS, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL HOED THE CITY HARMLESS FOR ANY THIRD -PARTY INCONVENIENCE CREATED BY WORK OF HIS OWN FORCES OR THAT OF HIS AGENTS. ANY DAMAGES INCURRED SHALL BE THE CONTRACTORS FINANCIAL RESPONSIBILITY. AS NEEDED, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ADJUST/RELOCATE THE SANITARY SEWER AND WATER LINES ONLY. ALL OTHER ADJUSTMENTS/RELOCATIONS WILL BE PERFORMED BY THE VARIOUS UTILITY OWNERS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE WORK WITH UTILITY OWNERS SO AS NOT TO ADVERSELY AFFECT THE PROJECT SCHEDULE. THE CITY WILL NOT BE HELD RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY DELAYS OR DISRUPTIONS TO THE WORK SCHEDULE OF OTHER UTILITY OWNERS. o FOR UTILITY LOCATES CALL NORTH CAROLINA ONE -CALL @ 1800-632-4949. o FOR LOCATES OF UTILITIES NOT MEMBERS OF NORTH CAROLINA ONE -CALL CONTACT PROJECT MANAGER & UTILITY COORDINATOR, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ADJUST ALL WATER VALVES, WATER METER BOXES AND WATER VAULTS TO FINISHED GRADE, WATER METERS LOCATED IN SIDEWALKS OR CONCRETE DRIVEWA T SHALL BE INSTALLED WITHIN CONCRETE BOXES. GAS LINES WILL BE ADJUSTED/RELOCATED AS NEEDED BY PIEDMONT NATURAL GAS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT PIEDMONT NATURAL GAS AT LEAST TWO WEEKS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. EXISTING SANITARY SEWER AND WATER LINE: THE CONTRACTOR SHALE USE CARE WHEN WORKING AROUND SANITARY SEWERS AND WATER LINES. SHOULD THE CONTRACTOR DAMAGE EXISTING SEWER OR WATER LINES, HE SHALL IMMEDIATELY REPLACE THE LINE AT HIS EXPENSE WITH DUCTILE IRON PIPE. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPLACE SANITARY SEWER AND/OR WATER LINE, WITH A MINIMUM TEN FOOT SECTION OF DUCTILE IRON PIPE WHEN DRAINAGE PIPE COMES WITHIN TWO FEET OF SAID LINES, VERTICALLY OR HORIZONTALLY. SUBSURFACE PLANS: NO SUBSURFACE PLANS ARE AVAILABLE ON THIS PROJECT. THE CONTRACTOR MAY MAKE HIS OWN INVESTIGATION TO DETERMINE SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS. MAIL BOXES: THE CONTRACTOR SHALL RELOCATE ALL MAIL BOXES AS REQUIRED BY SECTION 107-12 OF THE NCDOT STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR ROADS AND STRUCTURES, COORDINATE THIS WORK WITH THE U.S. POSTAL SERVICE. FENCES: THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REMOVE AND RESET FENCES AS NOTED ON THE PLANS AND/OR AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER, TREES, SHRUBS, AND HEDGES: THE CONTRACTOR IS REQUIRED TO REMOVE TREES; SHRUBS, AND HEDGES WITHIN THE EASEMENT LINES UNLESS SHOWN ON THE PLANS TO BE PROTECTED. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ALSO PROTECT TREES AND SHRUBS OUTSIDE OF CUT/FILL LINES, IN ADDITION TO THOSE THAT RECEIVE TREES/SHRUB PROTECTION BARRIERS. WHEN ROOT PRUNING IS NECESSARY, CUT ROOTS CLEANLY USING A DISC TRENCHER IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 01000 OF THE CITY OF CHARLOTTE LANDSCAPE CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS. PRUNING SHALL BE PER THE LATEST STANDARD OF THE LANDSCAPE CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS MANUAL (TYP.) USE PLYWOOD FORMS WHEN TREE ROOTS ARE ADJACENT TO PROPOSED CURB & GUTTER OR SIDEWALK. USE CLD STD. 40.11 FOR BRIDGING TREE ROOTS. TREES SPECIFIED BY THE PLANS TO HAVE ASPHALT CURBING MUST USE CLD STD. 40.13. TREE PROTECTION SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH CLD STD. 40.02, WHEN THE TREE IS CLOSE TO THE WORK AREA TREE PROTECTION CLD STD. 40.12 SHALL BE USED. SIDE SLOPES: LIMITS OF PROPOSED SLOPES ARE INDICATED IN THE PLANS, DETAILS AND STANDARD DRAWINGS. THE MAXIMUM SLOPE SHALL NOT EXCEED A 3:1 (HORIZONTAL TO VERTICAL) UNLESS DESIGNATED BY THE ENGINEER. A CUT SLOPE OF 2:1 MAXIMUM WILL BE USED ONLY AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER. GENERAL NOTES EROSION CONTROL: THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN EROSION CONTROL DEVICES IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE APPROPRIATE CITY AND STATE EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL ORDINANCES. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PREVENT STANDING WATER DUE TO CONSTRUCTION. DISTURBED AREAS SHALL BE SEEDED AND MULCHED AT THE DIRECTION OF THE ENGINEER. THE CONTRACTOR SHALE FOI IOW THE EROSION CONTROL MEASURES SHOWN ON SHEETS FC1-EC2 ACCESSIBLE RAMPS AND DEPRESSED CURB: THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONSTRUCT 6 -INCH THICK CONCRETE ACCESSIBLE RAMPS AT INTERSECTIONS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LATEST REVISIONS FOR ACCESSIBLE RAMP DETAILS, CONSTRUCTK'XI PLANS & NCDOT STANDARD DRAWINGS. SAWCU TS: THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SAWCUT EXISTING ASPHALT AND/OR CONCRETE SURFACES PRIOR TO REMOVAL UNLESS OTHERWISE DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER. SAW CUT WIDTH SHALL BE 1 FOOT MINIMUM FROM THE EXISTING EDGE OF PAVEMENT, SAW CUT PAVEMENT SHALL BE REPLACED AS WELL AS ADDITIONAL PAVEMENT REQUIRED TO TIE-IN TO FACE OF PROPOSED CURB AND GUTTER. PAVEMENT DEGRADATION FEE: =SIT HAS DETERMINED THAT NO PAVEMENT DEGRADATION FEE IS TO BE ASSESSED. TRAFFIC CONTROL: TRAFFIC CONTROL SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE 2006 EDITION OF THE "WORK AREA TRAFFIC CONTROL HANDBOOK" (WATCH) AND THE TRAFFIC CONTROL PLANS ON SHEETS TCP1 & TCP2. STANDARDS THE FOLLOWING STANDARDS AND THE LATEST REVISION THERETO ARE APPLICABLE TO THIS PROJECT AND BY REFERENCE ARE CONSIDERED A PART OF THESE PLANS. NCDOT STANDARDS SHALL BE USED. CHARLOTTE LAND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS MAY BE USED IF THERE IS NOT AN APPLICABLE NCDOT STANDARD. NCDOT: BM...................................BENCH MARK D OF INT TITLE: 840.01....._................................................................................BRICK C&G................................CURB CATCH BASIN 840.03........................................................................................FRAME, PROPOSED GRATE & HOOD 840.15........................................................................................BRICK CMP................................CORRUGATED DROP INLET 84016. ....... ........... ............ ....... ............. ............. .....DROP INLET FRAME & GRATE 840.51........................................................................................BRICK DB. ...... ... MANHOLE 840.54. ..... ....... ............. ............. ....... ........... MANHOLE FRAME & COVER 848.01........................................................................................CONCRETE DIA..................................DIAMETER SIDEWALKS 852.01_ ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... .... ............CONCRETE ISLANDS 862.01........................................................................................GUARDRAIL E. . ......... ......... PLACEMENT 862.02___ ..... ........ .... GUARDRAIL INSTALLATION 1251.01.... _ _ _ _ _ _ _ -__ _ _- _ .....PAVEMENT MARKINGS -PAVEMENT MARKERS CHARLOTTE:- ESMT...... ... .... ...EASEMENT D .,..EXISTING TITLE: 10.25A ..... ........_._ .__ _ ......... _ .__ ... _ .__ ..RESIDENTAE DROP CURB TYPE 1 10.31 A ........................... _ _ ....................... _ .........................ACC RAMP WITH 2'-6" C&G 10.31 B.......................................................................................ACC GV...................................GAS RAMP WITH 2'6" C&G 10.3513 .......................................................................................TRUNCATED WIRE DOME 10.36A.... ...............CULVERT CROSSING 10.36B.... ............ .............. ......... .....CULVERT CROSSING 40,02_ ........................ ............. ......................................... ...... TREE PROTECTION DETAIL 50.04A.........................................................................................TYPICAL LEFT SAFETY RAIL 50.04B............................................._............_............................TYPICAL LP...................................LIGHT SAFETY RAIL WARRANTS CDOT 2004 PAVEMENT MARKING STANDARDS ABBREVIATIONS ABAND............................ABANDONED NOT TO SCALE A,D.................................ALGEBRAIC DIFFERENCE ASPH .............................. ASPHALT APPROX....................... _APPROXIMATELY B/C.................................BACK OF CURB BIT__ ........ ........ _ .... BITUMINOUS BM...................................BENCH MARK BRG.................................BEARING OF INT CB...................................CATCH BASIN C&G................................CURB AND GUTTER CL...................................CLEARANCE PROPOSED C/L FENCE.....................CHAIN LINK FENCE CMP................................CORRUGATED MTE PIPE CONC..............................CONCRETE OF VERT INT CON ST ............................. CON STRU CTI ON DB. ...... ... _.DEED BOOK DCB................................DOUBLE CB Dl__ ...... ....... ... .....DROP INLET DIA..................................DIAMETER RELOCATE DW...................................DRIVEWAY OF WAY DIM.....................................DIMENSION ..SOUTH E. . ......... ......... .... EAST/EASTING EA ................................... EACH ELEV................................ELEVATION RAIL FENCE EOP.................................EDGE OF PAVEMENT ESMT...... ... .... ...EASEMENT EXIST.... ... ..... .,..EXISTING E/C.................................FACE OF CURB FES..................................FLARED END SECTION FH. ............. ...... ... ...FIRE HYDRANT FOC.................................FIBER OPTIC CABLE GV...................................GAS VALVE HORIZ..............................HORIZONTAL WIRE INT..................................INTERSECTION TYPICAL INV..................................INVERT GROUND IP....................................IRON PIN SET L...................................... LENGTH LE....................................LINEAR FOOTAGE ET.................................... LEFT Ib....................................POUND METER LP...................................LIGHT POLE MAX.................................MAXIMUM WATER VALVE MIN..................................MINIMUM ...... _SIXTY PENNY NAIL SET MONO..............................MONOLITHIC FOOT mph... ..... ... MILES PER HOUR MTL ................................. M ETAL N....................................NORTH/NORTHING WARRANTS STANDARD SAFETY RAIL (STD. #50.04A) SHALL BE INSTALLED UNDER ANY OF THE FOLLOWING CIRCUMSTANCES IN BOTH NEW CONSTRUCTION AND IN RETROFITTING OR RECONSTRUCTION OF POSTING STINGNG ROADWAYS OR SITES: 1. WHEN THE CULVERT CROSSING DETAIL CSTD. #10.36A -B) APPLIES. 2. IF THERE IS A TWO FOOT OR GREATER DROPOFF WITHIN 2 FEE OF TH EDGE OF THE SIDEWALK (SEE DIAGRAM A), 3. IF THERE IS A 1 -FOOT OR LARGER DROPOFF DIRECTLY ADJACENT TO THE SIDEWALK EDGE (SEE DIAGRAM B). 4, AT THE TOP OF ANY DROPOFF WITHIN THE PEDESTRIAN CLEAR ZONE OR WHERE PEDESTRIANS CAN REASONABLY BE EXPECTED IN THE VICINITY. 5. AT THE DIRECTION OF CDOT OR ENGINEERING & PROPERTY MANAGEMENT STAFF BASED ON FIELD CONDITIONS. DEFINITIONS • DROPOFF -- A SLOPE OF 2:1 OR STEEPER. EXAMPLES INCLUDE HEADWALLS, RETAINING WALLS, AND CULVERTS. • PEDESTRIAN CLEAR ZONE -- 10 FEE OF ANY COMBINATION. OF SIDEWALK, SLOPE, AND SHOULDER SLOPED AT 6:1 OR FLATTER. SIDEWALK DOES NOT NEED TO BE PRESENT. • SIDEWALK -- FOR PURPOSES OF THIS STANDARD, THE TERM "SIDEWALK" IS USED GENERICALLY AND SHALL MEAN ANY PATH OR SURFACE TO BE USED FOR BICYCLE AND/OR PEDESTRIAN TRANSPORTATION. EXAMPLE INCLUDE, BUT ARE NOT LIMITED TO, SIDEWALKS, BIKE PATHS, SHARED -USE PATHS, PEDESTRIAN PATHS, AND GREENWAYS. w�• CITY OF CHARLOTTE ebb LAND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS CRARLOTTIL INCLUDES CHARLOTTE ETJ 2 G4_ NTS__ ....... . NOT TO SCALE 0/H........... _....... ..... OVER HEAD OC ............................ON CENTER PAVT ... .......... ........... PAVEMENT PC............................POINT OF CURVATURE PERM., .............. ..... ..PERMANENT PG............................PAGE PI..................._........POINT OF INT PK ............................PK NAIL SET PP............................POWER POLE PROP ........................ PROPOSED PSE._ ...... ...... ...PERM SW ESMT PT............................POINT OF TANGENCY PVI...........................POINT OF VERT INT POE ..........................PERM UTILITY ESMT r ... .............. .............. RADIUS RT.__ ...... ___ ...... _.RIGHT RCP..........................REINFORCED CONIC PIPE RELOC...................... RELOCATE R/W .............:......:.....RIGHT OF WAY S, ......... ......... ..SOUTH SD............................STORM DRAIN SF___ ....... .... ...SQUARE FOOT S/R FENCE..............SPLIT RAIL FENCE SS_ .... ........ ............ SANITARY SEWER STA .......................... STATION STD._ ......... ........ STANDARD SW_ ............. ............ SIDEWALK TAN_ ....... _ .... ........ ..TANGENT TICE_ .... ...... ...... ..... TEMP CONST ESMT TEMP........................TEMPORARY TP............................TRAVERSE POINT T/W..........................TEST WIRE TYP.......................... TYPICAL U/G..........................UNDER GROUND VC............................VERTICAL CURVE VERT__ W___ ... __ .... ____ .WEST W/.............................WITH WM...........................WATER METER W VAULT..................WATER VAULT WV ........................... WATER VALVE 60p_ ...... ...... _SIXTY PENNY NAIL SET '................................. FOOT >> ..............................INCH V IHh RHIVI H SLOPED DROPOFF AT BACK OF SIDEWALK r IF VERTICAL DROPOFF IS LESS THAN SAFETY RAIL 1 FOOT, SAFETY RAIL MAY NOT BE 50.04A WARRANTED. INSTEAD, THE EDGE OF SIDEWALK MUST BE MARKED WITH 6" ZWIDE YELLOW PAINT LINE, 10' PAST DROPOFF O EACH DIRECTION ALONE' THE SIDEWALK. OFT R F7 SIDEWALK GREAT SEE APPROVED PRESERVATION F REQUIRED RADIO OF TREE BARRIE PLAN VIEW OF ROOT ZONE ONE FOC INCH OF OR 1/2 FOR PRUNING SEE WHICHEV INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY OF ARBORICULTURE SPECS. DEAD TREES AND SCRUB OR Uf GROWTH SHALL BE CUT FLUSH ADJACENT GRADE. NO GRUBBIN ALLOWED UNDER DRIP LINE. 2"x4" STANDARDS + 1"x4" RAILS OR ORANGE SAFETY FENCING MAY BE USED. NOTES: 1. REMOVE ALL BARRIERS UPON COMPLETION OF PROJECT. 2 LANDSCAPING PLANS SHALL SHOW THE LOCATIONS OF ALL TREE PROTECTION FENCES, 3. REFER TO CITY OF CHARLOTTE LANDSCAPE CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS SECTION 01000. FOR GENERAL SPECIFICATION REGARDING TREE PROTECTION. RK MULCH, PLACE BARK I AT AREAS NOT CTED BY BARRIER. • CITY OF CHARLOTTE �_h ILAND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS I TREE PROTECTION DETAIL STD ND REV. CII:\RI.OTTI;. INCLUDES CHARLOTTE ETJ 40.02 rn r SIDEWALK TRANSITION DETAIL Not to scale A B C I n D F� 1. ALL CONCRETE TO BE 3600 P.S.I. COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH. DIAGRAM B 2. TYPE OF PIPE TO BE USED IS 1-5/8" MAX. O.D. BLACK IRON, LOW CARBON PIPE OR GALVANIZED. 3. ALL JOINTS TO HAVE A 1/2" FILLET WELD AT ALL JOINTS. VERTICAL DROPOFF AT BACK OF SIDEWALK 4. AFTER INSTALLATION PAINT ASSMBLY WITH BLACK ALL WEATHER ENAMEL, NOT TO SCALE 5. SEE DETAIL 50,04-B FOR WARRANTS • CITY OF CHARLOTTE SAFETY RAIL WARRANTS LAND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS SAFETY RAIL 50'048 7 CII,\R1.07TIi INCLUDES CHARLOTTE ETJ 0 D R r 0'-2.9' 10' 4' 3'-7.9' 25' 19' 8'+ 50' 44' C/VJ IIINV VF1F\I L. VF`III CJ L VEC FiJJ )IUr-VVHLF\ GROUND 3'-4' 3'-4' 3'1 3••1 LINE WITH MATTING FOR EROSION CONTROL, SEED & MULCH NOTE: EROSION CONTROL MATTING SHALL CONSIST OF 70% STRAW AND 30% COCONUT AND BE BACKED AND INSTALLED ACCORDING TO THE MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATIONS. DITCH DETAIL Not to scale Wednesday, September 25, 2013 8:39:36 AM W O • N N W � N i M N w co 2 w 16 f) 0 U j r o CL C -1z M W CD Lu •• 0 Z W o 0 O W C ca Q x z M Q CCi c a U " }a MIX W y I^ ao �o,,�z 0- U5 F «S W J CC Z ~ 0 0 az�s R V w (7 p" _ u- Wz u ozzz F m �0 w c�a z 0 a u w 0 m ELI E 0 0 O Q = Z N LL W W:3 L Z O w z p w o w � w 00 Q � � o I z a w c� 0 0 o z 0 U : o a m _ 3 N LO 0. 0. �z A O A W W MSI MSI w0 � O w W N o Wednesday, September 25, 2013 8:39:36 AM MATERIAL SCHEDULE Cl PROPOSED APPROX. 3" ASPHALT CONCRETE SURFACE COURSE, TYPE S 9.513 AT AN AVERAGE RATE OF 168 LBS. PER SQ. YD. C2 PROPOSED VARIABLE DEPTH ASPHALT CONCRETE SURFACE COURSE, TYPE S 9.513 AT AN AVERAGE RATE OF 112 LBS. PER SQ. YD. TO BE PLACED IN LAYERS NOT LESS THAN 1.5" OR GREATER THAN 2" D1 PROPOSED APPROX. 4" ASPHALT CONCRETE INTERMEDIATE COURSE, TYPE 119.013 AT AN AVERAGE RATE OF 228 LBS. PER SY. YD. IN EACH OF TWO LAYERS. E1 PROPOSED APPROX. 6" ASPHALT CONCRETE BASE COURSE, TYPE B 25.013 AT AN AVERAGE RATE OF 342 LBS. PER SQ. YD. M PROPOSED MILLING 1.0"-2" R1 2'-6" CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER (NCDOT STD. 846.01) R2 MONOLITHIC CONCRETE ISLAND (NCDOT STD. 852.01) S PROPOSED 4" CONC SIDEWALK T EARTH MATERIAL: COMPACTED TO 95% STANDARD PROCTOR U EXISTING PAVEMENT 2'-0" 6 4-8' VARIES s � O 2% 2% R 70' Right of Way GRADE 14' I OI N T 22' 2'-6" I 2% 061 2% PROSPERITY RIDGE RD. STA. 10+00-10+82 TYPICAL SECTION #1 N.T.S 75' Right of I 2'-6" 14'-16' P "" " ' 21' 2'-6" 8' I I C1 zy 2% PROSPERITY RIDGE RD. -(L1)- STA. 10+82-11+50 (PROP. PAV'T WIDTH 35') STA. 17+46.56-19+06.44 N.T.S 80' Right of I I 8' 2% 6' 2 0 6' S W �. T VARIES l'-22' /.Z —I -I VAKILb 11J.3—ZZ lb I Z —6 1 4-- 'e, 5 I C2 — T C1 M MATCH EX. SLOPE —� — E1 D1 PROP. 1' SAWCUT RIDGE RD. -(Y1)- STA. 30+00.00-31+00.00 N.T.S ..Moor 1% I Wednesday, September 25, 2013 3:41:11 PM W O N O N co � N C N IA C0 U c" 11 Z �� ;.;F W2 so R Z o w7 c Z w .d o° '° X a LL 0 F w� 0.0 w 6 064 0: (D w ~0. F, F 0adw v� C Z O ¢zas a x— Uujz ujz p" u Ozz � }tea 0 c�wa U. z 0 a u w 0 m w F- 0 0 z O �■ v Qi H Z= � V i H W� D w z u Q w o 0 w c L;j 0 z 0. w O U o z O V a 3 J a. N Luo)0. < W � � i ,-, A O O U � � a � M o ..Moor 1% I Wednesday, September 25, 2013 3:41:11 PM MATERIAL SCHEDULE 6' 11'-19' C1 PROPOSED APPROX. 3" ASPHALT CONCRETE SURFACE COURSE, TYPE S 9.513 AT AN AVERAGE RATE OF 168 LBS. PER SQ. YD. C2 PROPOSED VARIABLE DEPTH ASPHALT CONCRETE SURFACE COURSE, TYPE S 9.513 AT AN AVERAGE RATE OF 112 LBS. PER SQ. YD. TO BE PLACED IN LAYERS NOT LESS THAN 1.5" OR GREATER THAN 2" D1 PROPOSED APPROX. 4" ASPHALT CONCRETE INTERMEDIATE COURSE, TYPE 1 19.013 AT AN AVERAGE RATE OF 228 LBS. PER SY. YD. IN EACH OF TWO LAYERS. E1 PROPOSED APPROX. 6" ASPHALT CONCRETE BASE COURSE, TYPE B 25.013 AT AN AVERAGE RATE OF 342 LBS. PER SQ. YD, M PROPOSED MILLING FROM 1.0" —2" R1 2'-6" CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER (NCDOT STD. 846.01) R2 MONOLITHIC CONCRETE ISLAND (NCDOT STD. 852.01) S PROPOSED 4" CONC SIDEWALK T EARTH MATERIAL: COMPACTED TO 95% STANDARD PROCTOR U EXISTING PAVEMENT Right of Way Length Varies CL -(Yl)- GRADE 2'-6" 23'-25' 14'-6' /POINT 19'-25' 19'-25' C1 2% C2 M C2 J D1 PROP. 1' E1 SAWCUT RIDGE RD. -(Y1)- STA. 31+00.00-33+00 TYPICAL SECTION #5 N.T.S _ Right of Way Length Varies CL -(Y1)- I I POINT 27' 11 6' 11'-19' W 8'-16' 2'-6" 8' O 2 G T— C2 M C2 M C1 2X `C R1 J, PROP. 1' D1 T SAWCUT E1 E1 RIDGE RD. —(Y1)— STA. 34+30-35+70 STA. 35+70-36+50 (WAVERLY LYNN LN. INTERSECTION ON RIGHT SIDE) TYPICAL SECTION #6 N.T.S 100' Riaht of Wav 6' 2% -17' RIDGE RD. —(Y1)— STA. 36+50-41+13 TYPICAL SECTION #7 N.T.S TIE INTO 01- —01" CH CL (Y1)- I GRADE I 4.5'-1.5 3.5 6' 22' 4' 4' PROP. 1' C1 M C2 SAWCUT 2% 8% TIE INTO EX. DITCH A Cl D1 E1 E1 RIDGE RD. —(Y1)— STA. 41+13-43+85 TYPICAL SECTION #7 N.T.S 6' 4- .woop' Nam Wednesday, September 25, 2013 8:32:06 AM W O N O N co � N t C0 U CM, '1-01z �� v 2 •• s o to z o WU' Z WX .d o° '° LL a IL 0 C� r-La� U F W 6 i. 064 �w 0 z 0 Z Bozo ¢zas a x— UUjz Ujz p' u Ozz }tea m 0 UWd z O u w D m w F- 0 0 z O v Q H Z= ri V i H W� G Z U w 0 Q �U o z F- 0. w w 0 � m m I z � 0 LLJ 3 Ljj J 0 N LO 0. < W � � AO O w N w w0 �O O a, w o .woop' Nam Wednesday, September 25, 2013 8:32:06 AM 784 io 776 772 m 764 BE 760 1R8+75 119+00 119+50 120+00 120+50 121+00 121+50 O °o 00— \ 17 \\\ \\ 029-311-38 \\ \ \ CHARTER PROPERTIES INC \ \ \ \ \ DB 23185 PG 651 \ \ \\ \ \ 4925 RIDGE RD ODWp B/ A ASELINE Y-1 \ �\ STA. 119+20 SD -1 \ :... �>\ \ \ \ o� \ BEGIN PROP. IMPROVEMENTS2Q�' �� \ \ \ \ TIE TO EX. CHANNEL \ : ;.' J� / Q \ \ \ \ REMOVE ACCUMULATEDa. SEDIMENT & DEBRIS q �h / / ° Q PROP. 26 LF OF 16" DIP W R \ \ MAIN, CLASS 250 WITH 24" STEEL \ \ \\ \ \ ->>0ENCASEMENT P} E (0.250" THICK) / 0 DWA SE E L- \ \ \ \ \ \ R0��0 F BANK O�� / //�T o / ��Q \ ///� /. a PROP BM OF NK T //� I C /// F \ \ mss \ �� \' \ REMOVE EX. CB / / / \ N 1469471.0 A 5 LF OF RCP HARDWOOD 20" I I I �v �\\ �• p _ / / . +49. L- / STA' . 3+ 2 Y-1 \ STA. 0+87.846.13' . S D- 1 DW .hg \\ RtM � F / BARD 36" CPS 34 T I o' / UT UT 029-313-03 1 I III �(( \ \ o c1M=7 �6 pUT 122+00 122+50 123+00 123+50 124+00 SHRUB �G/ \ /INVERT -774.62' m o �— UE V _ Z�ToO REMAIN 6 8"METAL PIPE \ ASPHALT o • \ DRIVE / I _ n v 124+50 784 776 772 764 760 124+ �� CON v� / \ / DRIVE \ PROP 60 LFf ®MIN 0.50% < / I TRIANGULAR GRASS I CHANNEL SECTION #1 \ �/ ✓ / SEE DETAIL SHEET SD -4 J � v 18 + 1 11 1 I 1 I FFA \✓/ rn 029-411-01 Q116 \ .`1$ 9 REECE EARL UNTZ AND LINDA F. UNTZ / DB 2585 PG 286- �< I FFA 4902 RIDGE RD \ / I I 1 I 1, I 1 1 1 *� 1 1 1 1 1 BUILDING - \99 - /- 0\ ° \ GRADE DITCH TO DRAIN - DD 1 TO STRUCTURE 18 e / — / VE IN- e _ e e / WIL D. BURCH 1, I 1 n \ _ O e � o o i /� HARDWO A � I 11 I . �e � DB 15384 PG 452 1 i 1 I I I e \ \ Sp\ \ \ \P �o. / S3 IN R OUT 63.80' J,Q \ \ I I ' 1 I I I I _ 5310 WAVERLY LYNN L I w �l ROP _ - / ROP 8 IP SEWE CLASS 350 po WOOD\3 HARDWOOD 12' 1 I I I GRADE\AREA TO DRAIN �I 8x / �® 0.60�ENT�E D X50 TWI 7 1 STEEL INTERSECTION \ \ I I I I 1 TO PRQP CHANNEL STA. 125>�- SD -1 N 595474'.766 \ ,cam _ - 1 ^� \ _- - - / " E 1 ` 9458.049 ( ��\12" \ 1 I i 1 I [ SND PROP. IMPROVEMENTS / I F �� MJ1(E - �5' ENCASE - I I _ J i 14V _ ,, �� SAN SEWER �� \ o 1 1 I I I I \ /� I� /TFE��O EX. CF�ANNEL MAN, �(%2 / - - RT 64. �� SrA. 18 36.2 L}1> \ HARDWOOD`S / WP �/ � � S .121 5.75, S-1 � ( ARDW 20" \ � - HARDWOOD 16" HARDW 1 ` _� I I I I \ E /029-313-02 1 I 1 I \e/ / UTT (TTP} \ f ( _ 8x4, - 15 o F \ / / / / SO m e ROBERT LYNCH 1 I ! PROP 10 TY R IC �O �� / / RCQC BASELIN b \ o \ / \ I j / DB 14575 PG 378 I COLD 0. 4A HA 24" NARD�ND�D�4 e / 50� o 08 WAVERLY LYNN L.N. 1 I y i / / 1 8 / \ UT / 3 VER HARDWOOD 1�"�H DW00 A 1 III \ / �` INTERSE N �. �/ S ` - \ <HARDWOOD 12" - �0 l I I 1 I \ -029-,313 / / / \ < % N 59581.Q F ° =\ 4t' ,c� \ HARDWOOD 16 E / 1 I 1 I I I ,ANGI A OR / / / iE 146 527. 94� - SO / 4 SDE PROP 100` SAFETY RAIL / A. 120 9.7 D-1 / o - DB � g77�4 ,534' / / �D / TA. 34 8.;30" Y-1 � G � -- _ _ SO-: C�� — o D 16" - y- - LD SdD 5 Q4A D WO o D- y SSE HA WOOD _7C N \- ` 69 � //g sT�ssRa � - HAR/W�� 20" FA� 9— Q' '9/ . HARD woo E / TO BE-RE-MOVED'-E\D' ; o Os/ /ROP BOTTOM O F BANK 3 ROP. 8 I SA SEWER A', oM-770- PROPTOP OFBAN 0 RIM=768.88' - SS q °o ` JN�ERT IN=763.50 _ J / i 0 O +\ H ADW 0" / E i SS SS INVERT IN= X3-2 / (o SS 8" S MIN % ' So w 140 / y \ "� � DwooD/8 0 A T¢ REMA Ss ------ / S / w INVE-'-rOUT=763.20' / NV = 5 ' SS R - - \ / \ / \ - - - \ 05 �� SEWER &MHSSi�dH RIM17 93' �X \ \ / / st mac/ / I Qom/ o �i �C` - RIM=770.20' \ - \ •c` _ _ SS INVERT�IAI- 0.v8' INVERT -1A1=263.91'/ // \ 1� ��` / / /v\ \ \ �\� ` ��---- SS---------�- \!y \ \ Q- / \ t/NVERT 943 INVERT OU 90' \ � � / � / IINVERT OUT=763.82' \ / \ \ � � O � � - � - - - - - - - - - - - PROP: 8" DIP AN SEWER i \ ` \ �o� \ 14 - s_ J �J� S" 2�\ �y !� // / �• Q" / 10 RIM -775.55 -- --- --s-� --_-� TO REMAIN_---- - __------- \ O II�VE T IN=77 5'� --- - - - _ / ----- -_HIIP36"-----------------_--- \ \ /,nnO�y��/\ \� A 3 \\ I/NVE T IN�76 '66' / \ \ APPROXZA-TE-LOCATI•eSN AS �------------------ Q (i \ 5° / / \ 6 VER OU f(--7 9.55' / \ CF+,RLOTTE M Ci4•L-NBURG �\ \ \ a ,Q \ \ % / \ / \ \\ - TILITY DEPAPTMENT / _ - - - - - - - - - - 8' / O �� / p <vQ / �y�, i.�' v O�Oi�l� ANNEXATION -7 091 SEgF(s 3 V / O J a / / / / / \ \ / Q 1 \ PROSPERITY CHURCH ROAD AR \ SHEET 9 OF 20 _ _ 029-411-90 NDN/kv�� \ \ \ \ \ \ / / ��o' OsiO \ \ / — \�� F CAROLINA STYLE/ 7 ��G/� // °\\� \\\ \�\ 13 DBR�8489 PG 55PERTIES 3 I y / /// O _ \ \ \ \ ` 0, O / Q C \ \ \ \ PROSPERITY RIDGE RD / S/ \► / VRIM-774.51' \ \, IQ IQ \ ) \ \ / OFA\, i �� 2� / i `� Ow J� �a� / // / 029-411-02 INVERT OUT=766.85' \ \ \ R 0 i NVER ,�^ IG1 /O \ I \ \ \ - - - - - C� \ ��Q / Tp, V �� / / / / CAROLINA STYLE \ \ i� RIM -775.55' \ \ / ��c/ / 8 s R M Q �� _ / / / PROPERTIES LLC \ \ �O -773.17' �%�O 02931510 \ \ ,t0�/ / / gtiSSgiN O / i / / �/ // / DB 18489 P553 INV�'F\'T '7.2 54' \RT OUT=77 1.21' \ �O -DERYL-R. LEAMING AND \ \ \� \ / / SFS SEE SHEET SD -3 / / / / / 4758 RIDGE RD \\ \ \ \ \� 1 LILA M.'tEAMKG- - / �''9 SEE SHEET SD -2 �DB 16927 PG 215 V °e° // -- \- - -// �� EFOR RIDGE RD. �,� �, / // / vvvvA 1 F \ �� v �. FOR PROSPERITY RIDGE 5305 WAVERLY LYNN LN.--- / / \ IMPROVEMENTS �� J �° // / / / / //� / s s� �\ RD. IMPROVEMENTS W O • 02 o � Nuj 0 00 R- ri ::D cn r � w Of �--� O0 i p = rn LLJ �0 =oU r W C U Lr - I J 0 0 05 (:lr All 01 z 0 1 a. U 0 n N 0 J 0 Z: } En�" l rn U Z I �� I I ONMM�tC .� o a= I B C m i r +I,� 4) co ri C c, 0:A OLz 1- (n�dMp.ai.�i��a a 0 co ��^OOOMN!A xll cn 0) o- 0 0 IX 0 �H Hp I �� W W W w a 0 5 I (n � � ap N n m NM NOS r O �rj M . OO M I� c(n V " M cp = Lj d m 7) 0) W M(0 co^ + m (y N I- O 0) — P O H 00 O r- �Q Qv cdO W + -1 a U) 000.E ULn qt w F1 SO+W c Nip FjOO --W ZZZ QOJ MM 00 OO(00 oc 00 CC a + w a 00 � a w LEO ^ J� ^MM n- ")w ZZZp r-^� Cr HH�ZZZZ Zai' +n c^D cOOj o—ia ,nn Q 3 + XWI-�Wzzzz 0- (n (n (n 0---- (9 CC.)Noco w 6O d 00 (n 6 j (n D j W 0 6 j LL Z EX. TELEPHONE + co LLJ W - M O TO BE RELOCATED BY OTHERS M v Z PROP. GRADE cr d W O (n H r- (n Z W J W WQ J W W W CC WQ J W W a_ a U) N p C ow - W O �- �- N EX. 2" GAS TO BE RELOCATED w (L H H S N N z O=+ O( W nM O O S+ z (n O=+ O(nd BY OTHERS _ PROP. 36" RCPI I EX E � Q � z 0- 0- EX. TELEPHONE \ " PROP. 18 RCP — I I 0- 0 cn a in N � m 0- 0 0 TO BE RELOCATED - _ _ - PROP. 15" RCP BY OTHERS \ \ ----� -- -----� ---- _-- \ I I ----1.50 -_- o _\ - 8'x4' RCBC ® 0. 09� _ _ - - PROP. 36 LF OF / - _ _- _ \ _-- ------ -- BE -- EX. 8 D.I.P. _—� _ - TO EX. DUAL 3 " RCP / I I I— TO REMAIN — _ - - -.50% EX. s" D.I.P. STA. 124+55 SD -1 — - - - - - - - J END PROP. IMPROVEMENTS o o Ex. s=DTP— 0 REMAIN PROP. 2 "RCP CHANNEL IM ROVEMENTS TIE TO CHANNEL SIA. 119+20 IN PROP. IMPROVEMENTS su_ PROP. 18" RCP 16" WATER MAIN TO BE REMOVED SECTION P1 SHE SSD E4 TIE TO EX. CHANNEL) PER MUD AS -BUILT Ex. 8" SAN, SEWER REMOVE ACCUM LATED JOE #300-89-255 SEDIMENT & I EBRIS PROP. 36 LF OF " DIP SAN SEWER, PROP. bt, LF OF CLASS 350 ® 0.60%. WITH 25 LF OF CHAI NEL IMPROVEMENTS PROP. RIP RAP STILLING BASIN 18" STEEL ENCASEMENT PIPE 0.250" THICK SEE TYPICAL CHANNEL SEE DETAIL SHEET SD -4 SEC ON 2 SHEET SD -4 PROP. 26 LF OF 16" DIP WA R MAIN, C ENCASEMENT ITH 24" STEEL PIPE 0°250" THICK) 119+00 119+50 120+00 120+50 121+00 121+50 O °o 00— \ 17 \\\ \\ 029-311-38 \\ \ \ CHARTER PROPERTIES INC \ \ \ \ \ DB 23185 PG 651 \ \ \\ \ \ 4925 RIDGE RD ODWp B/ A ASELINE Y-1 \ �\ STA. 119+20 SD -1 \ :... �>\ \ \ \ o� \ BEGIN PROP. IMPROVEMENTS2Q�' �� \ \ \ \ TIE TO EX. CHANNEL \ : ;.' J� / Q \ \ \ \ REMOVE ACCUMULATEDa. SEDIMENT & DEBRIS q �h / / ° Q PROP. 26 LF OF 16" DIP W R \ \ MAIN, CLASS 250 WITH 24" STEEL \ \ \\ \ \ ->>0ENCASEMENT P} E (0.250" THICK) / 0 DWA SE E L- \ \ \ \ \ \ R0��0 F BANK O�� / //�T o / ��Q \ ///� /. a PROP BM OF NK T //� I C /// F \ \ mss \ �� \' \ REMOVE EX. CB / / / \ N 1469471.0 A 5 LF OF RCP HARDWOOD 20" I I I �v �\\ �• p _ / / . +49. L- / STA' . 3+ 2 Y-1 \ STA. 0+87.846.13' . S D- 1 DW .hg \\ RtM � F / BARD 36" CPS 34 T I o' / UT UT 029-313-03 1 I III �(( \ \ o c1M=7 �6 pUT 122+00 122+50 123+00 123+50 124+00 SHRUB �G/ \ /INVERT -774.62' m o �— UE V _ Z�ToO REMAIN 6 8"METAL PIPE \ ASPHALT o • \ DRIVE / I _ n v 124+50 784 776 772 764 760 124+ �� CON v� / \ / DRIVE \ PROP 60 LFf ®MIN 0.50% < / I TRIANGULAR GRASS I CHANNEL SECTION #1 \ �/ ✓ / SEE DETAIL SHEET SD -4 J � v 18 + 1 11 1 I 1 I FFA \✓/ rn 029-411-01 Q116 \ .`1$ 9 REECE EARL UNTZ AND LINDA F. UNTZ / DB 2585 PG 286- �< I FFA 4902 RIDGE RD \ / I I 1 I 1, I 1 1 1 *� 1 1 1 1 1 BUILDING - \99 - /- 0\ ° \ GRADE DITCH TO DRAIN - DD 1 TO STRUCTURE 18 e / — / VE IN- e _ e e / WIL D. BURCH 1, I 1 n \ _ O e � o o i /� HARDWO A � I 11 I . �e � DB 15384 PG 452 1 i 1 I I I e \ \ Sp\ \ \ \P �o. / S3 IN R OUT 63.80' J,Q \ \ I I ' 1 I I I I _ 5310 WAVERLY LYNN L I w �l ROP _ - / ROP 8 IP SEWE CLASS 350 po WOOD\3 HARDWOOD 12' 1 I I I GRADE\AREA TO DRAIN �I 8x / �® 0.60�ENT�E D X50 TWI 7 1 STEEL INTERSECTION \ \ I I I I 1 TO PRQP CHANNEL STA. 125>�- SD -1 N 595474'.766 \ ,cam _ - 1 ^� \ _- - - / " E 1 ` 9458.049 ( ��\12" \ 1 I i 1 I [ SND PROP. IMPROVEMENTS / I F �� MJ1(E - �5' ENCASE - I I _ J i 14V _ ,, �� SAN SEWER �� \ o 1 1 I I I I \ /� I� /TFE��O EX. CF�ANNEL MAN, �(%2 / - - RT 64. �� SrA. 18 36.2 L}1> \ HARDWOOD`S / WP �/ � � S .121 5.75, S-1 � ( ARDW 20" \ � - HARDWOOD 16" HARDW 1 ` _� I I I I \ E /029-313-02 1 I 1 I \e/ / UTT (TTP} \ f ( _ 8x4, - 15 o F \ / / / / SO m e ROBERT LYNCH 1 I ! PROP 10 TY R IC �O �� / / RCQC BASELIN b \ o \ / \ I j / DB 14575 PG 378 I COLD 0. 4A HA 24" NARD�ND�D�4 e / 50� o 08 WAVERLY LYNN L.N. 1 I y i / / 1 8 / \ UT / 3 VER HARDWOOD 1�"�H DW00 A 1 III \ / �` INTERSE N �. �/ S ` - \ <HARDWOOD 12" - �0 l I I 1 I \ -029-,313 / / / \ < % N 59581.Q F ° =\ 4t' ,c� \ HARDWOOD 16 E / 1 I 1 I I I ,ANGI A OR / / / iE 146 527. 94� - SO / 4 SDE PROP 100` SAFETY RAIL / A. 120 9.7 D-1 / o - DB � g77�4 ,534' / / �D / TA. 34 8.;30" Y-1 � G � -- _ _ SO-: C�� — o D 16" - y- - LD SdD 5 Q4A D WO o D- y SSE HA WOOD _7C N \- ` 69 � //g sT�ssRa � - HAR/W�� 20" FA� 9— Q' '9/ . HARD woo E / TO BE-RE-MOVED'-E\D' ; o Os/ /ROP BOTTOM O F BANK 3 ROP. 8 I SA SEWER A', oM-770- PROPTOP OFBAN 0 RIM=768.88' - SS q °o ` JN�ERT IN=763.50 _ J / i 0 O +\ H ADW 0" / E i SS SS INVERT IN= X3-2 / (o SS 8" S MIN % ' So w 140 / y \ "� � DwooD/8 0 A T¢ REMA Ss ------ / S / w INVE-'-rOUT=763.20' / NV = 5 ' SS R - - \ / \ / \ - - - \ 05 �� SEWER &MHSSi�dH RIM17 93' �X \ \ / / st mac/ / I Qom/ o �i �C` - RIM=770.20' \ - \ •c` _ _ SS INVERT�IAI- 0.v8' INVERT -1A1=263.91'/ // \ 1� ��` / / /v\ \ \ �\� ` ��---- SS---------�- \!y \ \ Q- / \ t/NVERT 943 INVERT OU 90' \ � � / � / IINVERT OUT=763.82' \ / \ \ � � O � � - � - - - - - - - - - - - PROP: 8" DIP AN SEWER i \ ` \ �o� \ 14 - s_ J �J� S" 2�\ �y !� // / �• Q" / 10 RIM -775.55 -- --- --s-� --_-� TO REMAIN_---- - __------- \ O II�VE T IN=77 5'� --- - - - _ / ----- -_HIIP36"-----------------_--- \ \ /,nnO�y��/\ \� A 3 \\ I/NVE T IN�76 '66' / \ \ APPROXZA-TE-LOCATI•eSN AS �------------------ Q (i \ 5° / / \ 6 VER OU f(--7 9.55' / \ CF+,RLOTTE M Ci4•L-NBURG �\ \ \ a ,Q \ \ % / \ / \ \\ - TILITY DEPAPTMENT / _ - - - - - - - - - - 8' / O �� / p <vQ / �y�, i.�' v O�Oi�l� ANNEXATION -7 091 SEgF(s 3 V / O J a / / / / / \ \ / Q 1 \ PROSPERITY CHURCH ROAD AR \ SHEET 9 OF 20 _ _ 029-411-90 NDN/kv�� \ \ \ \ \ \ / / ��o' OsiO \ \ / — \�� F CAROLINA STYLE/ 7 ��G/� // °\\� \\\ \�\ 13 DBR�8489 PG 55PERTIES 3 I y / /// O _ \ \ \ \ ` 0, O / Q C \ \ \ \ PROSPERITY RIDGE RD / S/ \► / VRIM-774.51' \ \, IQ IQ \ ) \ \ / OFA\, i �� 2� / i `� Ow J� �a� / // / 029-411-02 INVERT OUT=766.85' \ \ \ R 0 i NVER ,�^ IG1 /O \ I \ \ \ - - - - - C� \ ��Q / Tp, V �� / / / / CAROLINA STYLE \ \ i� RIM -775.55' \ \ / ��c/ / 8 s R M Q �� _ / / / PROPERTIES LLC \ \ �O -773.17' �%�O 02931510 \ \ ,t0�/ / / gtiSSgiN O / i / / �/ // / DB 18489 P553 INV�'F\'T '7.2 54' \RT OUT=77 1.21' \ �O -DERYL-R. LEAMING AND \ \ \� \ / / SFS SEE SHEET SD -3 / / / / / 4758 RIDGE RD \\ \ \ \ \� 1 LILA M.'tEAMKG- - / �''9 SEE SHEET SD -2 �DB 16927 PG 215 V °e° // -- \- - -// �� EFOR RIDGE RD. �,� �, / // / vvvvA 1 F \ �� v �. FOR PROSPERITY RIDGE 5305 WAVERLY LYNN LN.--- / / \ IMPROVEMENTS �� J �° // / / / / //� / s s� �\ RD. IMPROVEMENTS W O • w o � Nuj 0 00 R- ri ::D cn r � w Of �--� O0 i p = rn LLJ �0 =oU W C U Lr - 0 0 U Z (:lr All z 0 a. U 0 n 0 0 Z: a>m� a= i O m i 4) ra� O � OLz 0 0 xll N L'i 0) o- 0 0 0 3 0 W _I ;3N w a 0 5 I n m O n c(n N= o = Lj d N O m 0 �Q Qv a a + w a 00 0 w LEO ^ ^ N 776 772 764 760 716+50 17+00 17+50 18+50 19+00 0 U m 1 1 029-411 i 02 1 1 CAROLINA/STYLE 1 1 PROPERTIES LLC 1 1 1 1 DB 18489 P553�O 4758 RIDGE RD 1 1 1 PROP. 8" DIP SAN SE R �' I 9 \ 16" WAT R MAIN M I I I I z► o I Q`` v RFLY VAL TYP) 1 I Jam' off,\ I 1 I 1 Io/I / `� /'� � CD � I I I I I ��° ��\ �� //l/ /// // � ��< o III. REMO 11X. I I. 8" qN R00 I _77o-_��I l lel°�1� jai, Pw � � 19+50 �I LDWAY BA�SELII Y-1 TV OVE I II " RC Is I 02 20+00 :o 776 772 764 760 20+726 i a I \ \_ P8 J\ PROP. 2� x *\` 1 1 \w \ REMOVE EX. CB I AND 25 LF OF RCP 1 9 6" WATER \ \ 1STEEL2 �, -311-38R�;" CN 59538 PIP \ 0.2 0" TRIC x TER PROPERTIES INC F I 52 .594\ �` Y DB 23185 PG 651 — —` F F — o- �S 1 I I U STA. 34+28.39I�Y-1 I, y 4925 RIDGE RD m/s<9 X3 �// ¢ q. 00 STA. 120 69.7 Sb / C' I O S3 k6P. 8" DIP AN. SEWER,, (o S 0 ® 0.60%, WITH 25 1 F 6F 18 STE 1 mom D 0 ��' ��^ E SEM NT RI b0.250 .' �_�� / / / 11 ?s `+-o �� J U 3 1 \ —_� I-ROADWA'1-MELNE L-1�P I 1 Z w LNE SD- J yC` cn 1 Q�-z I �� O U I ,/c� co- 1 — �� rnU 11 _ M I ( A� �o`"I h°`' I I �°� l o r 1 / O IN SECTION L�` rn . /� �o°'` �, A SS oo 5954c74.766 ERIiY-MIDGE — ,�� ,� \ �a� e� -� 14�69458.�49 0 �, 1 1 I \ N N PRpSP _ — ,, ��' G r, S1(A� 48+.36:72 L-1 IC RIGHT -OF WAY)o_ �,��j��o� �` t I �..,� _ /,-o / oo L. X121+85.7 `� 0 1 I N 595362. 50 I \V I/ pUBL nI �, 1 W 1469471. 37 I —_—. — �° ° o� E HPDE 3 0 1 1� �TA. 19+4 .55 Ll o I i P a�° 1 I 1 TA. 33+69242 1 A I PRO " RCP -)STA. 120+87.84 13 \f 14 � / / / �� 16 1 I I �= o O ° m –74 Co OY�� i o � o° a — o Pte/ O / �/ / / — — �P� ,/ / � � • �°� i� / —77 \ o / o --ORAPE DITCH 0 DRAIN TO STIR CTURE 18_jl vv PF \ N. \ \ 18 N, ,` ` PROP 60 LFf ® MIN 0.50% TRIANGULAR GRASS \ ` CHANNEL SECTION #1 SEE DETAIL SHEET SD -4 \ \ 029-411-01 �, \ \ . REECE EARL UNTZ \ \ AND LINDA F. UNTZ \ X \ \ N, v v DB 2585 PG 286 � �� v \ \ \ 4902 RIDGE RD • -sem _'7 Cb 1r7 co e. i Q O C I I/ cin I 1 113 00In n 17 \ I or -1 IL \ ! I1 LL I ,\ c J� co / r SEE ROADWAY PLAN AND PROFILE SHEET FOR PROP. IMPROVEMENTS TO RIDGE ROAD AND PROSPERITY RIDGE ROAD W Fmo Fmo O • I W O� N � P4 :� Lj ~C -j cn ~ �� J wo c D i �10=oc� w � Mw 1312 CD Ld Q) F'" r -- O U Z rlr f*&01 �!7j A\ NOz 0 i r U r� 0 r �M 30 r vi `�� J 2 0 15 0 z 04 pM ^p= �J ��r Q_' J �N i Z c m i CO = jcow eh p r�N d_:. S O N^� � uj i co n 04 'ter M t0 c*4 04 r Lo I J N J _j J~ rr a) m0'n WH �Or tf%J� v�c� JOC.4 pn N �Ij M = 0 ,Od d M�`�O _�l��O�sC9 � 13:LIJrn � N o J� Ir) QON tn � �J 0 0 0_ Oo Or HO� Q •Q �� O4 .M� W c6 c" QJ Q+ Q9M co n S �I_I ZS (6 OO^tOtD F �W cocoa IJ J-^ cOnN�M�M`-' cUP'��vv rO 'rCov O ^nr�v MNNvaoa JJ 0_ Z in C9 Z U MON + U NIS r r I I p W apo w w r z O a r+ j I� 1 NOOW �0_ r r Z Z= �— O� M N^ 0 0 to O � ,OOMN� n O N n �"' ^ e �Oco pI�IiMW c pp � to I� CO a OOM pcp O O Q 000 �� N 0 C) r m N a r 0" O OOQQ of L)jjQnof ~ W 0_(nF–(n W O H d OOQQ 0 l'I O_ r` r— j j j I (n C9zZZO M O N W IA (o Co n + _j co Oj co W OMWOI,d IM (A O ++IjI�H +l W -O`�I� W Q (f) V) __0 ~ A PROP. GRADE O-Z(AORzz 04°r°a.�Izzzo U�NO+OI`�nj rr o_O Mri-`IZO'i-I =Jo,gr,o� li IHwjjjj 0_ cncnozzzz o_ �UQQ< j j< 4 Z cncnc0zzc0 ++jo wolml,,l H w � w 0 � 0 a.zcncn -- cr a o_o rW?o odd O_Ucncn�Zz — — — — — — PROP. 100 LF OF EX. GRADE _ 36" RCP ® 1.00% / TO REMAIN 15" RCP STORM \EX. APPROX. LOCATION PROP. 40 LF "PROP EX. 2" GAS LINE 6 LFbF4" ®0.50 o AP EX. ROX. LOCATION TELEPHONE PROP. 16 LF OF roi TO REMAIN 36" RCP ® 0.507.— PROP. 21 L OF EX. TELEPHONE EX. 16" WATERMAIN ILI PROP. 2 t LF OF 24" RCP 00.50% APPROX. LDCATION TO REMAIN PROP. 113 8'X4' RCBC LF OF 0 0.50% EX. TO REMAIN 8" SANITARY SEWER 36" RCP 0 0.50% EX. TE PHONE EX. 8" SAVTARY SEWER 17+00 17+50 18+50 19+00 0 U m 1 1 029-411 i 02 1 1 CAROLINA/STYLE 1 1 PROPERTIES LLC 1 1 1 1 DB 18489 P553�O 4758 RIDGE RD 1 1 1 PROP. 8" DIP SAN SE R �' I 9 \ 16" WAT R MAIN M I I I I z► o I Q`` v RFLY VAL TYP) 1 I Jam' off,\ I 1 I 1 Io/I / `� /'� � CD � I I I I I ��° ��\ �� //l/ /// // � ��< o III. REMO 11X. I I. 8" qN R00 I _77o-_��I l lel°�1� jai, Pw � � 19+50 �I LDWAY BA�SELII Y-1 TV OVE I II " RC Is I 02 20+00 :o 776 772 764 760 20+726 i a I \ \_ P8 J\ PROP. 2� x *\` 1 1 \w \ REMOVE EX. CB I AND 25 LF OF RCP 1 9 6" WATER \ \ 1STEEL2 �, -311-38R�;" CN 59538 PIP \ 0.2 0" TRIC x TER PROPERTIES INC F I 52 .594\ �` Y DB 23185 PG 651 — —` F F — o- �S 1 I I U STA. 34+28.39I�Y-1 I, y 4925 RIDGE RD m/s<9 X3 �// ¢ q. 00 STA. 120 69.7 Sb / C' I O S3 k6P. 8" DIP AN. SEWER,, (o S 0 ® 0.60%, WITH 25 1 F 6F 18 STE 1 mom D 0 ��' ��^ E SEM NT RI b0.250 .' �_�� / / / 11 ?s `+-o �� J U 3 1 \ —_� I-ROADWA'1-MELNE L-1�P I 1 Z w LNE SD- J yC` cn 1 Q�-z I �� O U I ,/c� co- 1 — �� rnU 11 _ M I ( A� �o`"I h°`' I I �°� l o r 1 / O IN SECTION L�` rn . /� �o°'` �, A SS oo 5954c74.766 ERIiY-MIDGE — ,�� ,� \ �a� e� -� 14�69458.�49 0 �, 1 1 I \ N N PRpSP _ — ,, ��' G r, S1(A� 48+.36:72 L-1 IC RIGHT -OF WAY)o_ �,��j��o� �` t I �..,� _ /,-o / oo L. X121+85.7 `� 0 1 I N 595362. 50 I \V I/ pUBL nI �, 1 W 1469471. 37 I —_—. — �° ° o� E HPDE 3 0 1 1� �TA. 19+4 .55 Ll o I i P a�° 1 I 1 TA. 33+69242 1 A I PRO " RCP -)STA. 120+87.84 13 \f 14 � / / / �� 16 1 I I �= o O ° m –74 Co OY�� i o � o° a — o Pte/ O / �/ / / — — �P� ,/ / � � • �°� i� / —77 \ o / o --ORAPE DITCH 0 DRAIN TO STIR CTURE 18_jl vv PF \ N. \ \ 18 N, ,` ` PROP 60 LFf ® MIN 0.50% TRIANGULAR GRASS \ ` CHANNEL SECTION #1 SEE DETAIL SHEET SD -4 \ \ 029-411-01 �, \ \ . REECE EARL UNTZ \ \ AND LINDA F. UNTZ \ X \ \ N, v v DB 2585 PG 286 � �� v \ \ \ 4902 RIDGE RD • -sem _'7 Cb 1r7 co e. i Q O C I I/ cin I 1 113 00In n 17 \ I or -1 IL \ ! I1 LL I ,\ c J� co / r SEE ROADWAY PLAN AND PROFILE SHEET FOR PROP. IMPROVEMENTS TO RIDGE ROAD AND PROSPERITY RIDGE ROAD W Fmo Fmo O • W O� N � P4 :� Lj ~C -j cn ~ �� J wo c D i �10=oc� w � Mw CD Ld Q) F'" W _j U -- O U Z rlr f*&01 �!7j A\ NOz 0 U r� 0 n 2 0 0 z J O i Z c m i J � O CLz a) 0 pn N �Ij G = 0 M II � 13:LIJrn N u o 0 0 0 3 0 % W w:) 0- 0 5� n n O n c (n (n o = o a N 0 C) r m N a r O L Q L J �o o� W Q 1 O ~ A W w � w 0 � 0 cr a 788 784 I 776 772 764 760 7�1+ 00 03 31+50 32+00 32+50 33+00 33+50 34+00 P o4 1 \ - /-7 029-411-01 �F� / �'y / �' a� ) V / REECE EARL LINTZ ��j S l GRADE DITCH TO DRAIN ahJ ��6 \ 'o / AND LINDA F. LINTZ �� t REMATF _ \ 1 \ 6 TO STRUCTURE 18 a .\ DB 2585 PG 286 �� ,$ ME \ / �Z� / U 4902 RIDGE RD °Co��y I o \ o -- W e o Te /e- PROP 60 LFf ® MIN 0.50% \\ TRIANGULAR GRASS y \ V ACHANNEL SECTION #1I, �oby (C<)SEE DETAIL SHEET SD -4 l°s--�— c U \�v 16 o co47 \ oo ac p� 06 0� �\ 09� \ U O \°ooago o � _ �1g 6 30 o F F \ V \ \ e\ a \ \ a P R VE'EX. 8 A EWE \ \ o \ � e \ ` � I I o I o00 �4L �L e \F \ F\ F \ V R'OP-t5" ReP iI 11-\ I ROADWAY BASELINE L-1 ``��6' SSVC S,A, SEWER i 19 I I \ O 17 ! I c 7— Sir SS TO IBE RE g D 3 TO REMAIN irr� �� -� RCP 5' S SS ss SSP SAN. SE ( - - \—� - ISS SS T S - in - -G�G45SI SAN. S - \ / \ -� \-" -� - - - - - WITH 25 F ' o \ o \ — . �-- . o . . mss. — . — . o- ._1�8- EL ENCAS MENT - -7- s \ M j INTERSE TION S C IN 595362.750 �•) EE 1469471.837 JdTER E TION STA. r19+49.55 L-1 I N 595381 950 M STA./ 33+69.42 Y-1 / �E 1469 27. 94 T!_- M - M f M M ( / �q/ M 120+87.84 56.13'LT. SD -1 /REMAIN ST 34+28 39 1 / �, 1 WATER STA. 20+69. 7 SD 34+50 35+00 35+50 I o I P 6 I I II 11 I I CP I 1 I II II INTERSECTION I N 595474.76 \ \ 1 J E 1469458.0 9 �\ o u` STA. 18+36.7$ L 1 \ 0 I TA. 121+85.7�5�S�1� - - 36+00 788 784 780 776 772 764 36+7516 SEE ROADWAY PLAN AND PROFILE SHEET FOR PROP. IMPROVEMENTS TO RIDGE ROAD AND PROSPERITY RIDGE ROAD DETENTIOONN \� POND \ G\ \ \ \ o \ �•ys�ILQ \ 029-411- \ CAROLINA STYLE co cn \ i7, �0 1-PRQPERTIES LLC N � _ \ LF A\ _ DB 18489 P553 w Coo 8 U)z \p,� `C�j �9� \ F� 4758 RIDGt RD rn mD_I \ \ 6' j�i"U'��y � z 3 / 0 :Ks 30S -� ]GS 10s - _ \1-1 _ —�- 31(V/ 31n 31 n 31n 31In \ / 31n 31n —� �in 31n TV 130 30 30 30 30 \ 30 30 _ 0 - � TV TV � 30 \ 30 -_ — _ <v EX. 6 "S,�W SS �1T 30 — \ \ \ O RC _ _ _ - 09 P. 15" RCP 10 TO BE Rw R SS EMOSS S1 /� S'iy �iy / S2 T PROP. 8" DIP SAN SEWER / \ I M 6,- I I \ REMOW ROADWAY BASELINE Y-1wo .3: X. ,3RCS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ! I I . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . M MAIN . . TO BE REMOVED / T- 1= 7/ / / M " M M.I 10I . 30 y \ ��=�- _ PROP. 26 6 DIP W ER \ \ \ ROP. 16" WATER MAIN \ M M M M M\ M — _ OF 1 T - lir - - �' , _ _ - - - MAN, (LASS TH 24 STEEL � �� _—� \ -- �'� —�� _ ENCASEMENT PIPE 0.250" THfCK \�� um:P LY VALVE (TYP) RIDGE RD. Z co \� \ o 30. _ _ 0\---- 30 1 n —� 1 n —Y 1 n ........ — — — — — — — \ ASELI SD- _ _ — — — B� l _ - - V IES) I \ \ \\ In _ _ _ E 1 r \,- _ - (PH C RIGHT OF WAY A S �LLJ�� Z Q " In / \ \ \ m 171 i \��\ . ��Q \ \ �< 'I TO REMAIN \ / \ -tn— o Q w T Ai I ---------- ° -� PS PROP. 15\\ 02 F�, \�\ U� \ - - - - - - - - - - - - - >: X� C fit- 1 I O 0 s o o � TO REM �- 0 I AIN O Tl EX. RCP 18" \ \ I I I I \ PROP. 18" RCP - - - - - --c-ci>- -- I I I I GRAVEL DRIVE 0>) -. I I � 1 I ."..:r_. I I ._=:...:..: \F\ •I I I I I I/ REM VE EX. CB \ \ \ qF I IF �— F AND 25 LF OF RCP \ °d 1 I I I I ) I I I z� \ \� \ I \\\\ I e e e u� I� \ LL X \\ \ I----Og9 313-01---//��i // / z k�^' �I\\ I 0293510 i ��\- -,qN TV_ -- / / TU _ \ Y I DERYL R. LAMING AND O -�CE o - - -DB-1.4724 PG 334- - f / Y w Jam(' wQ LILA M. REAMING--�cn-530fi�VERLY LYNNLIT / DB 16927 \PG 215 029-311-38FEN\ \ - - - - - - QI J J \ CHARTER PROPERTIES INC \ \ o 91 r— / w > J �I I o X5305 WAVERLY\ LYNN LN.' DB 23185 PG 651 �� 0 N V N I \ \ \ 4925 RIDGE RD / �I x W J X w \ \ I / X �w w % w Q/ I I \ \ \ /qoLO / I o \ I \ \ w I LJ r Fmo O } • J W O� N � 1� vri J p. r I ~ �� J wo -H tnr O o=cy) F =oU wz Lj Q) w U Lr- _j -- O U Z a ��, co N^ Oe(Onn J J P704 r \ z 0 co r, a. I U •co(Vi STORM DRAINAGE DETAILS W E-� E� CENTER BOULDER TO TOP ELEVATION POINT • O MEASURE 2' IN WIDTH BOTTOM ELEVATION POINT AND ADJACENT BOULDERS - - \ \ 19'-3" TO BE SET 0.2' ABOVE _ _ 4' STREAM A ��s 0 m; 1 9.-4.. OF BANK_ - - - BOTTOM CENTER BOULDER T P - / ELEVATION. EXCAVATED SCOUR HOLE i // // / \ '=:, .....'....:.....:'::'::':;'::'::'::'::'::':: FLOW >/j//j//j/\// \ O' os 4':..: ::'::'::.:::.::'::'': \\\\\\\ �. :.::.:::::::::::: 77777J ............. . v . v �Lc.........:...........:...........:...........:....:.ii:c.: CD N O) BACKFILL WITH WELL GRADED MIX \ \ Li FILTER FABRIC PROFILE VIEW OF CLASS A AND B RIP RAP \ o v'7VVVVVVVZ TIE BOULDERS 3' INTO BANKS / / �\ \ \\ \ \ FILTER FABRIC KEY IN A MIN. OF 2'-3" FILTER FABRIC UNDER RIP RAP L _ TOP ELEVATION POINT \ \\ \ -L \ S CTION A -A Z � o /\//\//\//\/\//\/\//\/\/\/\/\\ ' /\/\/\/ /\ TOP OF BANK �i \ \ \ 1-1 P 0 0 L U) \ \ \ \ \ \'\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \// iJZa STRUCTURE STATION TOP ELEVATION POINT BOTTOM ELEVATION POINT DROP HEADER BOUDLER DEPTH A 123+65 767.18 766.68 0.5' 1.5' B 124+02 768.18 767.68 0.5' 1.5' C 124+40 769.18 768.68 0.5' 1.5' 13\ \ w z CD .....\ \ \\ \ \\ \\\�\ \ 24-0 BOTTOM OF BANK 1 1 1 1 1 1 M� J - - - 3' TO 8' - -� STREAM - \ V'�' o 0 0 o U o" p p C U2 � ¢ - FILTER FABRIC KEY IN a O z BOTTOM OF BANK _ _ _ I : I I : I : I I : I : I I : I : I I : I : I : I : I A MIN. OF 12" 5a 4'fl `,'-`, �, FILTER FABRIC UNDER RIP RAP EX. GROUND /�\\�\\/\\/�\/��\\� \�/��/\ /\/\/\/\/\/\/\/ SECTION B - B /\l 3) TOP BANK '\\/ APRON BANK PLAN VIEW_ _ - EXISTING AND I - -I �I I PROPOSED STORM 1:::::::::l I 1:::::::::l I Id ................................................ DRAIN PIPE NOTES DOWNSTREAM ELEVATION AT TOP OF ROCK ,�� 1. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR 0� 8'-0" 3'-0 24'-0" 3'-0" DETERMINING THE EXACT LOCATION OF THE !� SOF plop BMX GUL�/Ri.z BOULDERS EXISTING AND PROPOSED PIPES TO INSURE ��p ��P PROPER PLACEMENT OF OPENINGS. ...... 2. CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBMIT "SHOP NOTES: CHANNEL BANK ,•�p/c�� o 1. USE AVERAGE ROCK SIZE 2'x2'x1.5' FOR ..... BOULDERS UNDER HEADER ROCK. SOME VARIATION / FLOW -�-............................................. DRAWINGS" TO THE CITY, FOR APPROVAL -� IN BOULDER HEIGHT IS PERMITTED FOR HEADER � FLOW 1'-0" / FLOW �/ 4 4 v 3. CONTRACTOR'S "SHOP DRAWINGS" SHALL ROCK (MIN. 2'x1'x1'). _ - - - - - - - Z 1= - _ _ _ _ _ =1 BE SIGNED AND SEALED BY A PROFESSIONAL 2. FILTER FABRIC SHALL BE INSTALLED FROM THE `�, i ��, - - < - _ _ = PROP. ENGINEER LICENSED IN THE STATE OF NORTH MIDDLE OF THE HEADER BOULDER AND EXTEND C'� / I O O = I I BOX CULVERT CAROLINA PRIOR TO FABRICATION AND DOWNWARD TO THE DEPTH OF THE BOTTOM FOOTER �`o� j = - - - /� I-1 I I -I j 111-1-1 INSTALLATION. BOULDER, AND THEN UPSTREAM FOR A MINIMUM OF /\/ `II, � \ 1= _ _ �,_I I - 4. CONTRACTOR'S ENGINEER SHALL n SIX FEET. //\//\ N�1 _ � ��j I - - ///\//\ - - 1-- FILTER FABRIC UNDER RIP RAP DETERMINE OPENING SIZE, OPENING 3. A TRENCH SHALL BE EXCAVATED BELOW THE /\\/\\/\\ _ - _ - _ - _ I I -I I _ _ - - I-1 I BED FOR FOOTER BOULDERS. //\\//\\/ I I-1 ' - LOCATION, AND ADDITIONAL REBAR SIZE AND - _ - _ - _ - _ - _ - _ - _ - CLASS I RIP RAP PLACEMENT DUE TO REDUCED STRUCTURAL 4. STARTING AT BANKFULL, FOOTER BOULDERS /\\/\\/\\/\\/ - - - - - - - - \/\/ - - - - - - - - - - _ STILLING BASIN AT STRUCTURE 1 ADDITIONAL REBAR SUPPORT FROM OPENINGS. o SHALL BE PLACED FIRST AND THEN HEADER //\\//\\\\\\ _ .. _ .. _ .. _ .. _ .. _ _ .. _ .. _ .. _ .. _ .. _ - SEE NOTE 4 BOULDERS. - - - - - - / , NOT TO SCALE PIPE TIE-INS TO BOX CULVERT 5. A WELL GRADED MIX OF CLASS A AND B RIP _.._.._.._..______________ /�//�/// NOT TO SCALE RAP WILL BE USED TO FILL UPSTREAM SIDE OF THE / STRUCTURE. /// ___.------..------------- 3 (min.) VARIES /\/\/\/\/\/\/\ .. _ .. _ .. 2.0 2.0 6. AFTER ALL STONE HAS BEEN PLACED, THE /\\/\\/\\/\\/\\/\\/\\/ _-_ - //\//\//\//\//\//\//\//\--_----- 3.0 VARIES UPSTREAM SIDE OF THE STRUCTURE SHALL BE - - - - - - - 4 (min.) VARIES FILLED WITH ON-SITE ALLUVIUM TO THE ELEVATION //// 2.0 2.0 OF THE TOP OF THE HEADER BOULDER. 2.0 2.0 VARIES INSTALLED ACCORDING TO THE AAAKII ICAr TI 1DC:D'C D r(`ohAAACAIf1AT10K1Q a 7. ROCKS SHOULD BE HAND PICKED AND _ INDIVIDUALLY FITTED TO AVOID GAPS. BOULDER STEP STRUCTURE TR i= 8. ALLOWABLE TOLERANCE TO THE SURFACE NOT TO SCALE 1 �1 ELEVATION IS t2 INCHES. NOTE: EROSION CONTROL MATTING SHALL CONSIST CHANNEL B Tw TR ML1 MR1 D1 ML2 MR2 D2 OF 70% STRAW AND 30% COCONUT AND BE (ft.) (ft.) (ft.) (ft.) (ft.) C4 LIJ II �/ BACKED. EROSION CONTROL MATTING SHALL SECTION M L1 M R1 MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE PROJECT SPECIAL PROVISIONS, AND SHALL BE 1 3 (min.) VARIES VARIES 2.0 2.0 2.0 3.0 3.0 VARIES 2 4 (min.) VARIES VARIES 2.0 2.0 3.0 2.0 2.0 VARIES INSTALLED ACCORDING TO THE AAAKII ICAr TI 1DC:D'C D r(`ohAAACAIf1AT10K1Q a Tw = TOP WIDTH OF CHANNEL LINE WITH MATTING FOR TR = TOP WIDTH OF RIP RAP CHANNEL EROSION CONTROL, SEED & D1= DEPTH OF RIPRAP TOE CHANNEL D2= DEPTH OF CHANNEL MULCH AREA FROM TOP OF i CHANNEL TO TOP OF BANK Tw I / ,, a _ -� � 1-1 , j� TR i= 1 �1 O 0 B j-- -j M R 2 D 2 ML2 1 TD 1 1 C4 LIJ II �/ p m = M L1 M R1 o- CLASS I RIPRAP o 12" THK MIN. 0 I FILTER FABRIC UNDER RIP RAP C4 3 0 TYPICAL TRAPEZOIDAL RIP RAP CHANNEL SECTION % W NOT TO SCALE uia w NOTE: a EROSION CONTROL MATTING SHALL CONSIST OF 70% STRAW AND 30% COCONUT AND BE o m CU) BACKED. EROSION CONTROL MATTING SHALL _ a > N LINE WITH MATTING FOR > o� MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE PROJECT a EROSION CONTROL, SEED & U [y �o SPECIAL PROVISIONS, AND SHALL BE MULCH AREA FROM TOP OF �Q INSTALLED ACCORDING TO THE CHANNEL TO TOP OF BANK MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATIONS. A CHANNEL T D1 M R M L SECTION (ft.) (ft.) 1 1 JD1 w 3 6.0 1.0 3 3 M M L R O LINE WITH MATTING FOR o EROSION CONTROL, SEED AND MULCH TYPICAL TRIANGULAR GRASS CHANNEL SECTION z NOT TO SCALE DRAINAGE STRUCTURE SCHEDULE mi 11=Q i Z O v m i a yW� O 0 CLz 0 w C4 LIJ II �/ p m = M o- va) w = o v 0 I C4 3 0 % W uia w a o m CU) 0 V) m _ a > N O o > o� a U [y �o w �Q A w [--I 0 H O O o I:14 z w > w w z 2 U c LL J w Q FRAME, GRATES & HOOD a w Q � w > w > w > c PIPE LENGTH (LF)/SIZE v F (EA)Lu J = ~a p m J J O = a Q D o_ w a _ U a z a oLuLu a' o a' o a' F D Lu N J Z O cn cn F- (n > w O U o - ? O Lu Q STRUCTURE a O > w O > w O > w O w W D U a p w Y v Y v Y v m M a O x Z GRADE M F J a' J 0: J a' a R O w Q g r NUMBER w w a w a w a M CLASS III a m m m o E F G p 2 CONTROL ENDWALL TBJB DCB D w Z J ~ O y M STRUCTURE DETAIL, DETAIL, DETAIL, z N U NCDOT NCDOT NCDOT NCDOT CLD. NCDOT NCDOT DETAIL, SHEET SHEET SHEET w > > > > > > > Q 8'x 4' STD. STD. STD. STD. STD. STD. STD. SHEET SD -4 SD -6 SD -5 SD -5 _ (n Q F cn U. O FROM TO 2 ? ? ? ? ? ? ? O~ F- F w 15" 18" 24" 36" RCBC 840.72 840.01 840.15 840.51 20.03 NCDOT STD. 840.03 840.16 840.54 (EA) (EA) (EA) (EA) COMMENTS SD -1 SD -1 124+40 0.00' C I B - 769.18 768.68 1 SD -1 SD -1 124+02 0.00' B A - 768.18 767.68 1 1 1 1 1 SD -1 SD -1 123+65 0.00' A 5 - 767.18 766.68 1 SD -1 SD -1 123+17.89 0.00' 5 4 772.0 766.39 118 1 SD -1 SD -1 121+99.54 0.00' 4 3 773.5 765.80 5 766.30 11 766.26 15 765.60 7.90 2.90 179 1 1 SD -1 SD -1 120+98.68 0.00' 3 2 - 765.97 9 1 765.10 - 18" OPENING SD -1 SD -1 120+23.33 4.0' RT 2 1 770.5 766.82 8 766.39 7 764.71 4 764.51 5.99 0.99 36 2 1 SD -1 SD -1 119+84.70 0.00' 1 - 770.0 764.32 5.68 0.68 1 SD -3 Y-1 35+78.33 50.08' RT P7 2 - 767.74 2 767.74 135 0.4465 SD -3 Y-1 34+16.33 45.08' RT P8 2 - 767.49 2 767.49 1 27 1 1 0.3990 SD -3 Y-1 35+10.00 27.03' LT 10 9 771.1 767.21 3.89 44 1 1 2 SD -3 Y-1 34+66.00 27.03' LT 9 3 771.1 766.68 10 766.48 4.62 1 43 1 1 1 2 SD -2 L-1 17+13.23 23.87' RT 14 13 775.2 768.70 6.50 1.50 40 1 1 SD -2 L-1 17+14.46 14.20' LT 13 11 775.4 768.30 14 768.10 7.30 2.30 100 1 1 SD -2 L-1 18+09.70 30.76' LT 12 11 774.4 766.60 EX 766.50 7.90 2.90 16 1 1 1 SD -2 L-1 18+13.43 14.42' LT 11 4 773.6 766.42 12 1 767.10 13 766.42 1 7.18 2.18 24 1 1 1 1 SD -3 Y-1 32+02.22 27.03' LT 19 17 778.9 775.66 3.24 95 1 1 1 1 SD -3 Y-1 32+97.22 60.19' LT 18 17 1 771.0 768.25 1 2.75 32 1 1 SD -3 Y-1 32+97.22 27.03' LT 17 16 774.0 770.50 19 767.61 18 767.40 6.60 1.60 1 64 1 1 1 1 Y-1 33+54.84 57.58' LT SD -3 L-1 18+96.36 27.42' RT 1 16 15 772.1 1 767.08 1 17 1 1 766.88 5.22 0.22 61 1 1 SD -2 L-1 18+33.50 24.18' RT 15 4 773.1 766.57 16 766.37 6.73 1.73 21 1 1 TOTALS 166 1 210 1 146 1 180 1 333 1 0.85 1 7 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 6 1 3 1 4 1 1 1 2 1 3 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 0 mi 11=Q i Z O v m i yW� O 0 CLz 0 C4 LIJ II �/ p m = M o- va) w = o v 0 I C4 3 0 % W a o m CU) 0 V) m _ a > N O o > o� a U [y �o �Q A A `� [--I 0 H O O O I:14 z STRUCTURE DETAILS W E� Oa � - 1 2.50 14.50 \ \ PROP. 8'x4' I 0.89' PROP. 8'x4' BOX CULVERT 1.03' PROP. 4' TBMH BOX CULVERT I Lj CN ~ N 0.46' 0.61' NZ PROP. DCB B GRATE TYPE "E" (2) o wOf ^,r M K4 z (nU1-4 0 — v2a w�6' —A PROP. A PROP. i. O SOU p� Z A A 24" RCP 6.50 O w 36" RCP a PROP. 15=' RCP _ _ PROP. 8.50' — — — — ~� wow O o z 18 RCP t� B PROP. 8x4 R BOX CULVERT I B PROP. 8'x4' #5 REBAR—// BOX CULVERT PLAN VIEW PLAN VIEW TOP SLAB 0 VA U PLAN VIEW PLAN VIEW TOP SLAB Lc] Q n 0 0 z RIM ELEV. 773.5± LIP OF GRATE ELEV. 770.5± Q I I I O 15" RCP I PROP. — — PROP. 8'x4' PROP. PROP. 8'x4' 18" RCP I BOX CULVERT I 36" RCP m BOX CULVERT — —' PROP. I O 24" RCP _ INV IN ELEV. 764.71 .„ .:..�.... _. „,. _ R PROP BOX CULVERT Lu 0 L�:e,�.,----------� . .:.:..:.;.r; .. j �''-.•' EV. 763.51 ' BOTTOM EL PROP BOX CULVERT A INV OUT ELEV.765.60 O � Z :! r. q. INV IN ELEV. 765.80 ,` a: BOTTOM V. 7 4. ELEV. 6 60 Q SECTION A—A SECTION A—A N p m� = V) w rn o v 0 I PROP 15" RCP PROP 24" RCP o 0 3 c 4 c U) o V, � m Lj a > PROP. 8'xPROP. 8'x4' \ o m m V) BOX CULVER BOX CULVERT PROP. 8'x4' PROP. 8'x4' ° Q BOX CULVERT 1 1 BOX CULVERT o nU } — — — — a •^• O i` .+ ITI SECTION B B w SECTION B—B z A A N O � a STRUCTURE 02 STRUCTURE 04 z A A NOT TO SCALE NOT TO SCALE 'ook 804 :11 796 792 788 784 780 776 772 r.: tM CD n ❑ 792.03 791.20 790.47 789.78 789.00 788.12 787.15 786.13 785.20 ❑ E 0 0 E E 0 0 0 E ❑ 791.89 791.06 790.32 789.63 788.86 787.99 787.02 786.03 785.13 784.26 E 0 E E E 0 0 0 E 804 796 792 788 784 780 776 772 768 CA C1i n n 10+00 10+50 11+00 11+50 12+00 12+50 13+00 13+50 14+00 14+50 15+00 15+25 029415-39 HAMMOND I O O2 029-415-3 Y ANN BOW ER ROBERT K DB 17513 PG 349 029-415-40 029-415 42 029-411-10 029-411-02 / BOB�Y BOWSER AND MAR 1 DGE RD 5049 PROSPERITY RIDGE RD 247 PROSPERITY RIDGE COMMUNITY REEK DB 17564 PG RI FENTRESS D. KELLY INC MALLARD AND CAROLINA STYLE OSPERI DB 17193 PG ASSOCIATION INC STEWART MALLARD C PROPERTIES LLC 5045 PR 5053 PROSPERITY RIDGE RD DB 14042 PG 191 DB 18489 PG 553 OPTIMIST CLU 4758 RIDGE RD I I I /9 / I PROSPERITY RIDGE RD Dg 4244 PG 183 I III RIDGE RD TIE INTO EX. SW ® STA. I I / / 12+72.10(L1) 32.74'LT I I I I/ PROP. PAVEMENT DTH CHANGES FROM TIE INTO EX. C&G I I 35' TO 37' FROM STA. 11+19.96-12+72.46 AT STA. 12+72.60 I I m00 / LEFT IDE ONLY -(L1)- (L1) 16.19'LT x / / e I W � \� / I I e e / J I // W c F ° / LLJ I TIE INTO EX. SW ® G I I LLL STA. 10+83.21(L1) J 22.83'RT O O C / I C Ld cV \ \� / / LLJ SW \7_ PROP. 6 CONC. - - _- d --- °°� `� �� _ ❑ N \ \ PROP. 8' PLANTING STRIP + p ADJUST WM wM I U - H - � -Lam-,- 0 _ A=�i816" 1400OSTA.12+43.92 -(L1)- R=797.00' -(L1)-� 40'3 '50"E ,�=5'4753" PR®SpERITY RIDE R®' 16.38' RT. L 69.16'Ln N: 596206.61S 35' R=1814.00' STA.12+33.82 -(L1)-D. DIST NCE=69.13' CU 31'4�OgTq' L=183.61,E:1469080.43 -` 100.64 / - R=1355.00' I I / DISTANCE=183.53' WOR . --- T=384.35' 00 Q CHD• -- - ---- - ---- - WCR - - cHo. Disr W S' � (� 30' \ _ ANCE=73952' �� 3p, o NAVES �qN - \ PROP. 8' PLANTING STRIP M� / APER W - M ---F - PROP. 6' CONC. SW - -- --F ---- - ---------- -- - - - - - F __ q e - - �- Nf TgpfR F � F e ADJUST W --- F F e� _-� M �� I I En►o ------ TIE INTO EX. C&G ® STA. e - - � e START PROP. C&G TRANSITION 12+80(L1) 20.96'RT __ � I � STA, ?ROP C&G F F F e e STA. 12+24-(L1)- 21.43'RT 7 M = =1)=.9387 Q e e PROP. R/W START PROP. C&G TRANSITION END PROP. C&G TRANSITION � M STA. 12+54-(L1)- 21.33'RT STA. 14+45-(L1)- 21.93'RT / REMOVE EX. 54LF STA.14+55.56 -(L1)- I" OF GUARDRAIL \ 17.70 STA.14+65.69 -(L1) RT. w TIE INTO EX. SW ®STA. o I 17.70' RT. 10+37.62(L1) 35.80'LTO \ I = I REMOVE 30LF OF EX. TIE INTO EX. C&G ®STA. C&G &REPAIR EX. PAVT. 10+30.03(L1) 23.50'LT 029-411-10 INC MALLARD AND TYATION INC STEWART MALLARD CREEK 02`� 15-B6 ASSOCI/ OPTIMIST CLUB RIMY RIDGE COM PG 191 DB 4244 PG 183 PROSPE Dg 14042IDGE RD RIDGE RD 3 029-411-90 4g30 PROSPERITY CAROLINA STYLE PROPERTIES LLC DB 18489 PG 553 \ PROSPERITY RIDGE RD W O 80.00' VC N O N co C N � t O` L) M 10 F M M d Cl) W l0 t Wz O Q may" O S m ° c X -z = LL Q a a P\fl STA. _11+58.24 t �0 a� ^ ' ISI W pave F J atS W i� rA � N 0- Q Z as mg vw� a U ozz z o 19 0 c-wJa PVI ELEV. = 789.14 U w A.D. _ -1.30% W ca -61.44 0 z O HIGH POINT ELEV. = 790.24 112.00 C Z= HIGH P INT STA. = 11+18.24 PVI STA. = 12+70.74 LL W EG PROSPERITY RIDGE RD. PVI ELEV. = 1784.58 Q n O O W K = 65.17 Ca � N II U 00 O H N d n, Q U 00 N m m o z p f $ U _ 3 Q N u� - + N 1 w A o rn + �•j � t"T , 1 W O 0 -3.3 N U + 00 n -2.759, Nn � n Li W ccCV _ _ - 0° m FINISHED GROUND PROFILE 00 n - PROSPERITY RIDGE' RD. W - U _ -4.059 -------- e w -2.349 -1.96% --_ -=-LF pF ,_HDPE II � g I N III -- _ M d co 00 d n p �A p N p N Lf).� N p� U) � � p� N 00 (0 p V) a) M n P7 � n � Cp p � p lA U) 00 O p d t0 N N cV p nj r, O O) p of p 00 of p 00 00 CA 00 00 00 P, n 00 P, 00 00 00 P6 M 00 C4 M 00 N N 00 N OD 00 O 00 p p 00 of p n cA CA n n n n n n n 0) n n 0) n n 00 n n 00 n n 00 n n 00 n n 00 n n 00 n n 00 n n n n 00 n n 00 n n 00 n n 00 n n 00 n n 00 n n n n n 804 796 792 788 784 780 776 772 768 CA C1i n n 10+00 10+50 11+00 11+50 12+00 12+50 13+00 13+50 14+00 14+50 15+00 15+25 029415-39 HAMMOND I O O2 029-415-3 Y ANN BOW ER ROBERT K DB 17513 PG 349 029-415-40 029-415 42 029-411-10 029-411-02 / BOB�Y BOWSER AND MAR 1 DGE RD 5049 PROSPERITY RIDGE RD 247 PROSPERITY RIDGE COMMUNITY REEK DB 17564 PG RI FENTRESS D. KELLY INC MALLARD AND CAROLINA STYLE OSPERI DB 17193 PG ASSOCIATION INC STEWART MALLARD C PROPERTIES LLC 5045 PR 5053 PROSPERITY RIDGE RD DB 14042 PG 191 DB 18489 PG 553 OPTIMIST CLU 4758 RIDGE RD I I I /9 / I PROSPERITY RIDGE RD Dg 4244 PG 183 I III RIDGE RD TIE INTO EX. SW ® STA. I I / / 12+72.10(L1) 32.74'LT I I I I/ PROP. PAVEMENT DTH CHANGES FROM TIE INTO EX. C&G I I 35' TO 37' FROM STA. 11+19.96-12+72.46 AT STA. 12+72.60 I I m00 / LEFT IDE ONLY -(L1)- (L1) 16.19'LT x / / e I W � \� / I I e e / J I // W c F ° / LLJ I TIE INTO EX. SW ® G I I LLL STA. 10+83.21(L1) J 22.83'RT O O C / I C Ld cV \ \� / / LLJ SW \7_ PROP. 6 CONC. - - _- d --- °°� `� �� _ ❑ N \ \ PROP. 8' PLANTING STRIP + p ADJUST WM wM I U - H - � -Lam-,- 0 _ A=�i816" 1400OSTA.12+43.92 -(L1)- R=797.00' -(L1)-� 40'3 '50"E ,�=5'4753" PR®SpERITY RIDE R®' 16.38' RT. L 69.16'Ln N: 596206.61S 35' R=1814.00' STA.12+33.82 -(L1)-D. DIST NCE=69.13' CU 31'4�OgTq' L=183.61,E:1469080.43 -` 100.64 / - R=1355.00' I I / DISTANCE=183.53' WOR . --- T=384.35' 00 Q CHD• -- - ---- - ---- - WCR - - cHo. Disr W S' � (� 30' \ _ ANCE=73952' �� 3p, o NAVES �qN - \ PROP. 8' PLANTING STRIP M� / APER W - M ---F - PROP. 6' CONC. SW - -- --F ---- - ---------- -- - - - - - F __ q e - - �- Nf TgpfR F � F e ADJUST W --- F F e� _-� M �� I I En►o ------ TIE INTO EX. C&G ® STA. e - - � e START PROP. C&G TRANSITION 12+80(L1) 20.96'RT __ � I � STA, ?ROP C&G F F F e e STA. 12+24-(L1)- 21.43'RT 7 M = =1)=.9387 Q e e PROP. R/W START PROP. C&G TRANSITION END PROP. C&G TRANSITION � M STA. 12+54-(L1)- 21.33'RT STA. 14+45-(L1)- 21.93'RT / REMOVE EX. 54LF STA.14+55.56 -(L1)- I" OF GUARDRAIL \ 17.70 STA.14+65.69 -(L1) RT. w TIE INTO EX. SW ®STA. o I 17.70' RT. 10+37.62(L1) 35.80'LTO \ I = I REMOVE 30LF OF EX. TIE INTO EX. C&G ®STA. C&G &REPAIR EX. PAVT. 10+30.03(L1) 23.50'LT 029-411-10 INC MALLARD AND TYATION INC STEWART MALLARD CREEK 02`� 15-B6 ASSOCI/ OPTIMIST CLUB RIMY RIDGE COM PG 191 DB 4244 PG 183 PROSPE Dg 14042IDGE RD RIDGE RD 3 029-411-90 4g30 PROSPERITY CAROLINA STYLE PROPERTIES LLC DB 18489 PG 553 \ PROSPERITY RIDGE RD .00*1 `%% 1 -01 Tuesday, October 01, 2013 11:30:24 AM W O N O N co C N � t O` L) M 10 F M M d Cl) W l0 t Wz O Q may" O S m ° c X -z = LL Q a a t �0 a� ^ ' ISI W pave F J atS W i� rA � N 0- Q Z as mg vw� a U ozz z o 19 0 c-wJa z 0 U w 0 W ca 0 z O i N Z= O LL W Z Q n O O W Ca � N II U 00 O H n, Q U � m m o z p f $ U _ 3 Q N u� 1 A o + �•j � t"T , 1 W O 0 .00*1 `%% 1 -01 Tuesday, October 01, 2013 11:30:24 AM LEFT EOP ELEV. � � � � � � � � 775.22 774.74 774.27 773.80 773.37 772.82 772.44 RIGHT EOP ELEV. � � � � � � � � 775.01 774.54 774.06 773.60 773.16 772.94 772.38 780 780 776 772 768 764 N Of 776 772 768 764 760 15+25 15+50 16+00 16+50 17+00 17+50 18+00 18+50 19+00 19+50 20+00 20+50 2 2+x.42 I � rn a g RIDGE RD. CL - Y1 MATCH LINE SEE SHEET gas E4S M A as I w I L- gas Sas �- I w �� i - O I 70.81 _ 029-313-02 4+67- / ROBERT LYNCH I s DB 14575 PG 378 I 029-313-01 5308 WAVERLY LYNN LN �w I EX. 36" RCP PIPES 77 08 J O ANGIE TRAYLOR 7i DB 14774 PG 334 z 1 TO BE REMOVEDqj T 57_ �r • \ M i 5306 WAVERLY LYNN LN 2 EX. SDE t2- 1 UTILITY POLE & GUY WIRES TO 0 U T 3 n O 11 BE RELOCATED BY OTHERS 77 �' END OF PROP. HANDRAIL 170LF ®STA 1 / 0 4"6- 2z OE 029-411-02 W 18+25.60 L1 PER CMLDS STD. 10.36A -B 1 �I CAROLINA STYLE START OF PROP. HANDRAIL 70LF ®STA m I� ( ) # I / - 17+54 L1 PER CMLDS STD. 10.36A -B 1 x PROPERTIES LLC ( ) # DB 18489 PG 553 1 oP 4758 RIDGE RD REMOVE EX. 24" CMP PIPE REMOVE EX. HEADWALL j�N/N e / G 1 of iP� i TTIE INTO EX. SW 017+06.50 \ e \� C PROP. PRR CL -24.69' LT. AA v -- EX. 6' S/W PROP. 6' S/W SS - - - -- ITE -INTO EEX. C&G 017+06.61 R=1513' PROP. PLANTING STRIP WIDTH VARIES PROP. PRR CL -14.09 LT. w I L \ REPLACE EX. CB S rs� s� �sr �r 0 1n \ J 1n I 17 00 1800 CURVE DATA SS 38, 19 00 �o - I I I i \ \ �= 301 RITY 16 00 10x1LLJ TAPER I - 0=35 _ _ 1 _ R=13535.0 ,- v E I j �O�p L-!5749.02 Lij 0 I I \ gIDGE �° TIE INTO EX. C&G 016+70.77 REPLACE EX. CB PPE & OVE EX �CHHD. DISTANCE14739'S2E oy�w��Y 20 00 0��„ ` N PROP. PRR CL -23.18 RT. V. WWI - R=1413' ADJUST / / SS PROP. 8' PLA STRIP R=1331' `$ w t� � \ N + K AN TAPER �� NT�EX. SW ®16+70.77 5 / / / / �' oZ ��-'0- 1 �2 � PROP. PRR CL -33.42 RT. k I I EX. PROP. 6 CONC. S/W \ t4 / - a%M M �_ ,� 26 �>>, I I \ ADJUST PED. BASE 21 M �9 � M 21 02.42 _ �0 M i 3+ �- // s n �M START OF PROP. HANDRAIL 10OLF ®STA / / / �`� F F / / F F F 772.64 STA- \ \ \ 1- BP STA. 21+ 2.42 16+77(L1) PER CMLDS STD.#10.36A-B / / / 0S \ _ o� N: 595 10.67 - -►-- OF _ � a � n � - E: 75.78 Z / / / / UTILITY POLE TO BE R=143 ° 773.00A \\� J ADJUSTED BY OTHERS \ pe 33+20 ( ) \�y� o O / / END OF PROP. HANDRAIL 10OLF ®STA m a 17+77(L1) PER CMLDS STD.#10.36A-B a _ ' 0 33+ 0-(s\- (� 029-411-90 / / O n Y \� CAROLINA STYLE Q PROPERTIES LLC 4D N cn C DB 18489 PG 553 / / � � � � � � � N � �, � END PROP. SURFACE COURSE G PROSPERITY RIDGE RD / / / / \ \ O \ \ OF 32+979 )- TO TIE INTO .7 (Ll / � , y ®STA. 20+57.78-(L1) 28.09'LT 029-411-01 SAWCUT &REMOVE 2.5' OF 4D/ / a ` \ REECE EARL UNTZ \ ° a7aa34 _ \ EX. MONO. CONC. ISLAND AND LINDA F. UNTZ V) \ / / AND REBUILD ISLAND & ACC DB 2585 PG 286 U II I / RAMP DURING CONST. 2 \ \ \ 4902 RIDGE RD \ \ \ u- 0 I F \�\BUILDI� ~ I MATCH LINE STA. 32+48.88 - SEE SHEET 9 RIDGE RD. CL -(Yl)- NOTE: Y1 - NOTE: FOR PROPOSED STORM DRAINAGE INFORMATION SEE SHEET # SD -1 TO SD -6 W EX. EOP EX. C OF _1 729 PVI STA. = 18+46.42 N O N RIDGE RD. RIDGE RD. 01 �p G LL t z W O q ^2 .. M o w z w ¢ x z a FINISH GROUND PROFILE FOR C� Ww CL (D pave PVI ELEV. = 773.20 OSTA.19+45 W 06 Lu woo ¢zas @STA. 9+60.43 Q VWV' U Ozz z 0 vwa m PROSPERITY RIDGE RD. ,n K = 92,51 z -I •85X w 0 EXISTING GROUND N N PROSPERITY RIDGE RD. '1.99X a rn v a= U) Z i - W? ii 1.89% QO + II > o g S• m J w M w o .N � U N w U 00 o O w \ 0] � O p L) m G1 � C] 1 z U U w= o¢ w N Lo START PROP.ASPHALT TSTA. 17+04 \ \- W -0'7 % 1 FOR PROSPERITY RIDGE RD.(L1) Q -_\ � N .00% --- ----- ------ --- --- PLO Q� r-� -----___EXISTING GROUND ISI ',^ PROSPERITY RIDGE RD. 75L 0 36" EX. RCP � - - - - - .- � @1.8F8% TO BE REMOVED - - - - - -- - - - @1.90% TO BE REMOVED EX. SSMH - - STA. 18+45.69(Ll) 37.6 2' LT RIM ELEV. 770.20 INV. IN=763.91' 01 (o M 1� M O M O 00 M O � (o in rn 00 O 00 O O) O ^ N rn O to O (n 00 Lo O O N co M C M ^ O 0o O M N co It � O n N In co 00 N aj 00 00 00 06 n ^ r ^ r c6 c0 (6 c0 ui c0 uj C4 ui O 4 00 4 I, M � K) I� � 00 nj 00 CV N CV N ^ N CV cV cV cV cV .14 I ^ n r-^ ^ n ^ n r-^ ^ r r-^ ^ r- ^ r- ^ r-^ ^ � ^ n �^ ^ co � ^ to ^ co n co � ^ co n co r- ^ � r- ^ ^ n n n n n n n ^ n n n 776 772 768 764 760 15+25 15+50 16+00 16+50 17+00 17+50 18+00 18+50 19+00 19+50 20+00 20+50 2 2+x.42 I � rn a g RIDGE RD. CL - Y1 MATCH LINE SEE SHEET gas E4S M A as I w I L- gas Sas �- I w �� i - O I 70.81 _ 029-313-02 4+67- / ROBERT LYNCH I s DB 14575 PG 378 I 029-313-01 5308 WAVERLY LYNN LN �w I EX. 36" RCP PIPES 77 08 J O ANGIE TRAYLOR 7i DB 14774 PG 334 z 1 TO BE REMOVEDqj T 57_ �r • \ M i 5306 WAVERLY LYNN LN 2 EX. SDE t2- 1 UTILITY POLE & GUY WIRES TO 0 U T 3 n O 11 BE RELOCATED BY OTHERS 77 �' END OF PROP. HANDRAIL 170LF ®STA 1 / 0 4"6- 2z OE 029-411-02 W 18+25.60 L1 PER CMLDS STD. 10.36A -B 1 �I CAROLINA STYLE START OF PROP. HANDRAIL 70LF ®STA m I� ( ) # I / - 17+54 L1 PER CMLDS STD. 10.36A -B 1 x PROPERTIES LLC ( ) # DB 18489 PG 553 1 oP 4758 RIDGE RD REMOVE EX. 24" CMP PIPE REMOVE EX. HEADWALL j�N/N e / G 1 of iP� i TTIE INTO EX. SW 017+06.50 \ e \� C PROP. PRR CL -24.69' LT. AA v -- EX. 6' S/W PROP. 6' S/W SS - - - -- ITE -INTO EEX. C&G 017+06.61 R=1513' PROP. PLANTING STRIP WIDTH VARIES PROP. PRR CL -14.09 LT. w I L \ REPLACE EX. CB S rs� s� �sr �r 0 1n \ J 1n I 17 00 1800 CURVE DATA SS 38, 19 00 �o - I I I i \ \ �= 301 RITY 16 00 10x1LLJ TAPER I - 0=35 _ _ 1 _ R=13535.0 ,- v E I j �O�p L-!5749.02 Lij 0 I I \ gIDGE �° TIE INTO EX. C&G 016+70.77 REPLACE EX. CB PPE & OVE EX �CHHD. DISTANCE14739'S2E oy�w��Y 20 00 0��„ ` N PROP. PRR CL -23.18 RT. V. WWI - R=1413' ADJUST / / SS PROP. 8' PLA STRIP R=1331' `$ w t� � \ N + K AN TAPER �� NT�EX. SW ®16+70.77 5 / / / / �' oZ ��-'0- 1 �2 � PROP. PRR CL -33.42 RT. k I I EX. PROP. 6 CONC. S/W \ t4 / - a%M M �_ ,� 26 �>>, I I \ ADJUST PED. BASE 21 M �9 � M 21 02.42 _ �0 M i 3+ �- // s n �M START OF PROP. HANDRAIL 10OLF ®STA / / / �`� F F / / F F F 772.64 STA- \ \ \ 1- BP STA. 21+ 2.42 16+77(L1) PER CMLDS STD.#10.36A-B / / / 0S \ _ o� N: 595 10.67 - -►-- OF _ � a � n � - E: 75.78 Z / / / / UTILITY POLE TO BE R=143 ° 773.00A \\� J ADJUSTED BY OTHERS \ pe 33+20 ( ) \�y� o O / / END OF PROP. HANDRAIL 10OLF ®STA m a 17+77(L1) PER CMLDS STD.#10.36A-B a _ ' 0 33+ 0-(s\- (� 029-411-90 / / O n Y \� CAROLINA STYLE Q PROPERTIES LLC 4D N cn C DB 18489 PG 553 / / � � � � � � � N � �, � END PROP. SURFACE COURSE G PROSPERITY RIDGE RD / / / / \ \ O \ \ OF 32+979 )- TO TIE INTO .7 (Ll / � , y ®STA. 20+57.78-(L1) 28.09'LT 029-411-01 SAWCUT &REMOVE 2.5' OF 4D/ / a ` \ REECE EARL UNTZ \ ° a7aa34 _ \ EX. MONO. CONC. ISLAND AND LINDA F. UNTZ V) \ / / AND REBUILD ISLAND & ACC DB 2585 PG 286 U II I / RAMP DURING CONST. 2 \ \ \ 4902 RIDGE RD \ \ \ u- 0 I F \�\BUILDI� ~ I MATCH LINE STA. 32+48.88 - SEE SHEET 9 RIDGE RD. CL -(Yl)- NOTE: Y1 - NOTE: FOR PROPOSED STORM DRAINAGE INFORMATION SEE SHEET # SD -1 TO SD -6 W O N O N O N 01 �p G LL t z W O q ^2 .. M o w z w ¢ x z a ° U .0 LL a a �O C� Ww CL (D pave a Qn Z _ W 06 Lu woo ¢zas .� a Q VWV' U Ozz z 0 vwa m z a. w 0 O z a v a= U) Z i W? ii QO II > o g S• m J w M w o .N � w U 00 o O w Q � O p L) m G1 � C] 1 z U U w= o¢ w N Lo a� ¢ 1 Q 1 N � N PLO Q� r-� ISI ',^ LEFT EOP ELEV. 791.96 790.30 787.45 786.54 784.53 782.59 781.18 779.05 777.67 776.36 775.18 773.91 �T 770.86 771.02 771.24 RIGHT EOP ELEV. N O N CION � N T �p Lij M CL I- M MM Z W^2 .. Lo LL t o z w Lu w0 O X Z In = LL Q a a C� U �0 W CL a W pave Qn Z �w-.W EMS 792 788 784 780 v 772 768 764 MR 0 O n 30+00 30+50 31+00 31+50 32+00 w 32+50 33+00 MATCH LINE STA. 34+00 34+50 18 + 8 0 - (L 1) - SEE SHEET E E T g 0 SS 029-411-01 \ REECE EARL UNTZ PROP. 15' CON/C. D/W / 6 0 --D AND LINDA F. UNTZ PROP. 2 -6 CONC. C&G S ° CM S 10.25A) �pQ ' '61 \\ DB 2585 PG 286 \ � 21 LF POFD W PIPE �` Q • _ OE 0) OE \ \ SS 4902 RIDGE RD STA. 32+00(Y1) 27.00 LT 4 BE REMOVED PROP 120LF OF ASPH. CURB o o F � F F ° e p �v 01 SS e c Lq PROP. R/W F e F \ �% 0SS71 F ADJUST WM � o 71 ADJUST EX. UT SLA H. C G� ® s s ADJUST SSMH �SSMH N: 595258.07 mA C� -�� STA -30+79.91 (Y1 wM SS SS 8" PVC \ \ :1469118.40 30 00 /�� T UT T U T .}. SS SS B SS SS SS _ - SS - - 5S - - UT UT UT T M T UT � - - - - - --�JT - UT- n� �T UT -( F- 6" G r6ii///iiiiiiiiiiii� ��ii ��ii/6„ GL \ \ 31 Op 3: 00 33 00 4 0 _ . I ° w F\\ � R=703.48' � \ UT W L=148.99' 100 TAPER \ \ W - w A -148.71' - RIDGE RD. -(Y1)- W 1 1 \ W - W - G UT UT //// W W W W W W W W 16" WATER \ UTW r- / / / n0 MAIN W WF W \ \ - Uf _ - UT - - - - - UT UT ul UT UT 17 0 UT UT START -"OP. MILLING & RESURFACING -DEW K � � // O UT � =c -RLP 15_ ®STA. 30+00(Y,) \ o i cv D��VPL �o - - Au /tel � SIDEWALK OE � OE OE OE OE OE OE OF OE 2PPSSS / PROP. PAV'T MARKING SEE PM1 ADJUST PED. BASE START PROP. SURFACE COURSE SAWCUT & REMOVE 2.5' OF THAT TIES INTO EX. C&G i X EX. MONO. CONC. ISND AN ® STA. 32+02.00-(Y,) 43.14' RT. LA \ D REBUILD ISLAND &ACC , ST RT PROP. HANDRAIL 029-311-38 RAMP DURING CONST. \ / / ( ) i/ ®STA. 4+09- Y1 5 .50 RT CHARTER PROPERTIES INC END PROP. SURFACE COURSE DB 23185 PG 651 TO TIE INTO EX. C&G 4925 RIDGE RD ®STA. 20+57.78-(L,) 28.09'LT/// / FENCE X o/ 21+02.42 Ssc y 0 011 G 796 792 788 784 780 776 772 768 764 760 F, r- 35+00 35+25 F E UTE UTE OE OE OE O EX. 6' S/W �T 0 J \6.649° NIP N O N CION � N T �p Lij M CL I- M MM Z W^2 .. Lo LL t o z w Lu w0 O X Z In = LL Q a a C� U �0 W CL a W pave Qn Z �w-.W .� a W 35 OO 'Wn V z 0 In PROP. 6. MONO ISLAND W W W N u Lj Ln Q UT UT 0 m W w \�3�g z_ -SUE �IdE 0 c 0 z = F F U LY C w e e �-- H Q Z= 12 � V END PROP. HANDRAIL i O CSTA. 34+84-(Y,) 57.50'R LL W \ 162g SII N gg�� S m O a NM F- u 0\0 o r a Q `289 u •�� O p m G1 CQ C] of z �O � U c o¢ > J N s 459° W � W � N PLO \ 148CF PLO a LO r 2 1 11: \ 0 F \ \ 8P ,5269°• ss \ \ 2 LF OF 15 RCP 3.66% - -4.81y \ TO BE REMOVED --_--J \ - _ SOFT DIG LOCATION FOR EX. 6" GAS LI E APPROX. 3.1 OF CO ER -2.609; STA. 34+17. 0 -2.71q,EV. 768.15' \ ---- -_ _809a 063% EX. SSMHv:z--J STA. 32 43.39(Y1) 21.67'LT I EG FOR RIDGE RD. ADJUST RIM ELEV. TO 776.8' INV. IN 769.74' 57LF . VC �54q 39LF OF EX. g"PVC SS ©1.55 S FT DIG LOCATION OR EX. 16" WATER AIN -p�- ° APPROX. 7.72' OFC VER W - STA. 33+96.16 SOFT DIG LOCATION FOR EX. WATER MAIN = APPROX. 8.36' OF COVER STA. 34+50 ELEV.= 762.66' 00 N 00 to N r- 00 00 t0 � 0) 00 M O 0) N N O O t0 O N t N O) O t0 0) in � �O t � d 00 r- (0 O O 0) O u� M N� �� M M 0) (0 N (V O N O) 00 O 00 tC) 00 d co 00 M 00 _ rM 00 N Oi 06 Oi r (� r I6 cfl rto d M CV M ^ CV N ^ _ cV ^ (0 M r O) 0) O) 0) 00 00 00 00 00 ^ 1� ^ ^ n n n n ^ n ^ ^ n ^ n n n n n n 30+00 30+50 31+00 31+50 32+00 w 32+50 33+00 MATCH LINE STA. 34+00 34+50 18 + 8 0 - (L 1) - SEE SHEET E E T g 0 SS 029-411-01 \ REECE EARL UNTZ PROP. 15' CON/C. D/W / 6 0 --D AND LINDA F. UNTZ PROP. 2 -6 CONC. C&G S ° CM S 10.25A) �pQ ' '61 \\ DB 2585 PG 286 \ � 21 LF POFD W PIPE �` Q • _ OE 0) OE \ \ SS 4902 RIDGE RD STA. 32+00(Y1) 27.00 LT 4 BE REMOVED PROP 120LF OF ASPH. CURB o o F � F F ° e p �v 01 SS e c Lq PROP. R/W F e F \ �% 0SS71 F ADJUST WM � o 71 ADJUST EX. UT SLA H. C G� ® s s ADJUST SSMH �SSMH N: 595258.07 mA C� -�� STA -30+79.91 (Y1 wM SS SS 8" PVC \ \ :1469118.40 30 00 /�� T UT T U T .}. SS SS B SS SS SS _ - SS - - 5S - - UT UT UT T M T UT � - - - - - --�JT - UT- n� �T UT -( F- 6" G r6ii///iiiiiiiiiiii� ��ii ��ii/6„ GL \ \ 31 Op 3: 00 33 00 4 0 _ . I ° w F\\ � R=703.48' � \ UT W L=148.99' 100 TAPER \ \ W - w A -148.71' - RIDGE RD. -(Y1)- W 1 1 \ W - W - G UT UT //// W W W W W W W W 16" WATER \ UTW r- / / / n0 MAIN W WF W \ \ - Uf _ - UT - - - - - UT UT ul UT UT 17 0 UT UT START -"OP. MILLING & RESURFACING -DEW K � � // O UT � =c -RLP 15_ ®STA. 30+00(Y,) \ o i cv D��VPL �o - - Au /tel � SIDEWALK OE � OE OE OE OE OE OE OF OE 2PPSSS / PROP. PAV'T MARKING SEE PM1 ADJUST PED. BASE START PROP. SURFACE COURSE SAWCUT & REMOVE 2.5' OF THAT TIES INTO EX. C&G i X EX. MONO. CONC. ISND AN ® STA. 32+02.00-(Y,) 43.14' RT. LA \ D REBUILD ISLAND &ACC , ST RT PROP. HANDRAIL 029-311-38 RAMP DURING CONST. \ / / ( ) i/ ®STA. 4+09- Y1 5 .50 RT CHARTER PROPERTIES INC END PROP. SURFACE COURSE DB 23185 PG 651 TO TIE INTO EX. C&G 4925 RIDGE RD ®STA. 20+57.78-(L,) 28.09'LT/// / FENCE X o/ 21+02.42 Ssc y 0 011 G 796 792 788 784 780 776 772 768 764 760 F, r- 35+00 35+25 F E UTE UTE OE OE OE O EX. 6' S/W �T 0 J NIP N O N CION � N T �p Lij M CL I- M MM Z W^2 .. Lo LL t o z w Lu w0 O X Z In = LL Q a a C� U �0 W CL a W pave Qn Z �w-.W .� a W 35 OO 'Wn V z 0 In PROP. 6. MONO ISLAND W W W N u Lj Ln Q UT UT 0 m W w z_ -SUE �IdE 0 c 0 z = F F U LY C w e e �-- H Q Z= 12 � V END PROP. HANDRAIL i O CSTA. 34+84-(Y,) 57.50'R w 0 w O029-313-01 ANGIE TRAYLOR w DB 14774 PG 334 Q) 5306 WAVERLY LYNN LN � v . w N O 029-313-02 ROBERT LYNCH DB 14575 PG 378 w 5308 WAVERLY LYNN LN Tue , Octobe 0 3 53 0 AM W O 001 N O N CION � N T �p Y O` S) M CL I- M MM Z W^2 .. Lo LL t o z O a Lu w0 O X Z In = LL Q a a C� U �0 W CL a W pave Qn Z �w-.W .� a UWO Q uz u OZZ Z � vwa m z 0 r a u Lj 0 m w 0 0 z O H Z= � V i O LL W SII N gg�� S m O a NM F- u 0\0 o r a Q u •�� O p m G1 CQ C] of z �O � U c o¢ > J N W � W � N PLO PLO a LO r 2 1 11: Tue , Octobe 0 3 53 0 AM LEFT EOP ELEV. 771.30 771.82 772.35 773.20 773.87 774.72 775.60 776.46 777.36 778.04 778.68 779.20 779.70 780.17 780.62 781.05 781.50 781.96 (n 782.58 783.02 RIGHT EOP ELEV. 769.54 I 771.52 775.36 776.81 N N N N � N C N IA 777.27 N 1.0 10 � M M U 778.30 778.61 o 779.24 w y 'oo ° (L Z x z LL IL 779.66 780.08 F0 w� a� 780.51 780.95 v� 781.49 '' woo Azad � x - UujO 781.87 PLO 782.41 X ILL U OZZ 99 }tea 782.79 783.03 796 792 788 784 780 776 772 768 764 760 co n n 783.17 783.27 796 35+25 35+50 I cn E 36+00 UTE UTE UTEUTE UTE UTE END 2'-6" CONC. C&G STA.35+47.80 -(Y1)- 27.05' LT. 36+50 0 39+50 029-411-02 40+00 40+50 CAROLINA STYLE I PROPERTIES LLC DB 18489 PG 553 I III 4758 RIDGE RD DECORATIVE TREE MULTIPLE ONWERSoe�oRgr 0 II I I MULTIPLE ONWERS PROSPERITY VIEW DR rReee I I III (n PROSPERITY VIEW DR TOWNHOMES F I I TOWNHOMES N N N N � N C N IA N 1.0 10 � M M U t0 F M W v W LLo s o c C RZ o w y 'oo ° (L Z x z LL IL F0 w� a� (u 6 40 �owLD ow 10 ots W v� '' woo Azad � x - UujO PLO X ILL U OZZ 99 }tea O c�wa z 0 F- a. L) 9) w Q EG FOR RIDGE RD. m w a c� 0 z y _ 0.97% --- 1.96% O ti i H 1.93% 1.65% Z � V EX. SSMH STA. 35+85.25(Y1) RIM ELEV. 772.86' 20.03'LT % 2.21% y INV. IN 762.39' INV. IN 762.52' INV. OUT 762.26' 0 3.03% SII w-1 a _j ww p w d Q 5% 3'2 3.5770 _ % - - _ - - EX. DI STA. 36+44.95 Y1 49.52'RT ±o x F a /1 F OF 18" RCP© 1.0 .a RIM ELEV. 772.81' INV. OUT 768.41' Q a 0 3 _FT - ce a a0. AO 152LF OF EX. 8"PVC SS 00.45% �+ w O M V1 � N n n N n 00 N n n ndn n nOn LO M d n n n N N (n0 n n co(o n N 0) n r O 00 On n n 0) 0n n00 Onn n 7 ) On n n n co 00 °) 0) n a0 On 00 N O ao0 n Nn 00 ana0 r � r a o O 0 . a0 00 00 n nn 00 00 V aoo00 n to n n 000n 00 n 0 N 00 O O)n co '�n 00 n n 35+25 35+50 I cn E 36+00 UTE UTE UTEUTE UTE UTE END 2'-6" CONC. C&G STA.35+47.80 -(Y1)- 27.05' LT. 36+50 0 39+50 029-411-02 40+00 40+50 CAROLINA STYLE I PROPERTIES LLC DB 18489 PG 553 I III 4758 RIDGE RD DECORATIVE TREE MULTIPLE ONWERSoe�oRgr 0 37+00 37+50 DECORATIVE DECORATIVE TREE TREE DECORATIVE DECORATIVE TREE DECORATIVE 05 DECORATIVE TREE DECORATIVE )EVE TREE TREE 38+00 792 788 784 780 776 772 768 764 W -11f, to 0) IM 00 r- 38+50 38+50 39+00 39+50 40+00 40+50 I I 029-41 C-98 I III X I 029-41 C-98 MULTIPLE ONWERSoe�oRgr II I I MULTIPLE ONWERS PROSPERITY VIEW DR rReee I I III (n PROSPERITY VIEW DR TOWNHOMES F I I TOWNHOMES DECORATIVE DECORATIVE TREE REE 0 0 6EC ATIVE DF�C ATIVE EE T EE POS '0 I I m II I p0� 0 III � I I o F 'OZ 4c O I III I G P0L6 O Cly/ < II I yT O �i0yT G M o�icyT '1 �� SIGN Fo P�L� SIGN p��C/�1G EETIVE OSE po`l DE UT �9�y E� pE0 )E _ GAP UT UT ( f) UE U uE LiJ/TT/T%T /TETT/TTITIT�T/TT�TTT/T�TTT/T�TTT/T T/T/T Tl/T/T/l// /T W WSS LLJI Go o RIDGE RD. -(Y 1)- W ADJUST GV (%) 0 27 LLJ u� ADJUST GV G� G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G W Ln 36 00 37 00 38 00 N70'59'53"E 39 00 40100 (f) N j STA. 37+32(Y1) w 1381'01' PROP. 6' MONO. CONC. ISLAND 59' + 11.00'RT STA.39+32.65(Y1) NCDOT STD. 852.01® 9" STA. 38 6300 R1T � 26' � 6.00' RT. PROP. PAINTED ISLAND O 100LF TAPER wV W W W W W W W W - W- - W - W - W - - W W W W W W -w -Lv- W W W W W Ln Q i ADJUST WV + 15' o 27' - - cn cn PROP. 4' ASPHALT SHOULDEB . . . . . . d- _ _ LL] // F F F F F F F F F F C C F F C C Q o F _ F J START PROP. ASPH. SROULDER ®� o (� �/ 36+51.67 -(Y1) 28.00' RT. _ .. X19- EX. RCP 18" .,�� / W i-- t PROP. 6' S/W xisr of z Q ------ ---- ---------- -- - - - - - --------- ---------- - - ---- - - - -- - - _._.-------�---- ---- ---- � ��, _ ___ I _I ROP. 3.5' PLANTING IP D I m 02931510029-315-43 _ 1 I / DERYL R LEAMING AND LILA M LEAMING MICH LE L. DAMS AND LARRY LEE M DB 16927 PG 215 BR NDLE AND JUNE H. BRE DLE I U e e L I 5305 WAVERLY LYNN LN DB 17856 PG 488 I 029-315-45 I 31 JOHNSTON MILL C CHRISTOPHER J. GROUSE 53 I I i DB 13031 PG 935 029-315-48 5335 JOHNSTON MILL CT. TERRY GARRARD 1 END OF ASPH. WIDENING OSTA. 029-315-42 KRISTA L MANNO I I I o29-51 I I I DB 25836 PG 148 AN 35+70.36(Y1) 46.94'RT I 029-315-41 DEBORAH BUTTAR DB 13863 PG 4 I 4622 KINGSLAND CT JORENE R. OWNBEY DB 22014 PG 902 15333 JOHNSTON MILL CT DB 17161 PG 170 5329 JOHNSTON MILL CT 1 TRANSITION PROP. 2'7 " &G I 5321 JOHNSTON MILL CT I I I I I 029-315-47 TO EX. 2' VALLEY CURB I � I BRIDITTE MICHELLE WEAVER +D THOMS SAMUEL WEAVER AND SETRINA f. WEAVER \ I I Z I I I I I I I I DBI 24KINGGS11 LAND 46CT I 1% I l Monday, September 30, 2013 3:08:59 PM W O N N N N � N C N IA N 1.0 10 � M M U t0 F M W v W LLo s o c C RZ o w y 'oo ° (L Z x z LL IL F0 w� a� (u 6 40 �owLD ow 10 ots W v� '' woo Azad � x - UujO PLO X ILL U OZZ 99 }tea O c�wa z 0 F- a. L) 9) w Q m w a c� 0 z O ti i H Z � V i y W� 0 SII w-1 a _j ww p w d Q 0o ±o x F a .a Q a 0 3 N LO 8 ce a a0. AO �+ w O M V1 � PLO PLO 0 C 1% I l Monday, September 30, 2013 3:08:59 PM LEFT EOP ELEV. 771.30 783.53 783.27 783.50 DECORATIVE 41+14.29 (Y1) 38.11' LT. 782.84 782.35 781.75 781.05 780.27 779.45 778.47 777.50 776.27 RIGHT EOP ELEV. 769.54 783.49 783.35 783.21 783.00 782.58 782.03 0 OE - M. 796 792 788 784 780 776 772 CA I'll 00 r- 40+50 41+00 0 029-41 C-99 MULTIPLE ONWERS PROSPERITY VIEW DR TOWNHOMES REPLACE EX. ASPHALT TIE INTO EX. S/W AT DW AS NEEDED DECORATIVE 41+14.29 (Y1) 38.11' LT. PROP. /W TREE DECORATIVE DECORATIVE ECORATIVE DECORATIVE TREE TREE TREE TREE \ \ O e O� - 0 OE - GE LF Wi N O N co � N C N IA 30 V) CEDAR LL s c Z START OF WIDENING ®STA. w 41+14.19(Y1) 4.50 -LT z x Z a LL LLl 20:1 � GTAPER G G G 41t00 v� Z �0o azad � x - QI UujO LL U Ozz }tea � O c�wa U. z 0 CL CL x L) 9) w Q m w c� 0 z 0 i H Z= � V 0.64% -0.49% _ J H W -1.759; Z -2.40% �o -3.14 � Q o N Ew- � Q N v -3.589, 4.709,' zll x a .a 4.699,' r� Ca 0 Inn m oI z O 0 V 0. EG FOR RIDGE RD.. N LO �@• 8 cl� a a 00 00 WO �� O rn O 00 O0) sf C n 4O^! 0000 00O rn�^ COCO C f n C-4 ^ M t2 M CV ^ ao CCV 00 ^ n^ ao 00 ao n 00 O ^ n^ o (3o O r n^ b C� ^ Il n r- 1`1N) ^ ^ n^ I-LO ^ (�6 n � LO � n LO � n LO CV r- n CO 1`11`1b C O n 40+50 41+00 0 029-41 C-99 MULTIPLE ONWERS PROSPERITY VIEW DR TOWNHOMES REPLACE EX. ASPHALT 41' 41+50 41+73.8 (Y1) 34710 LT 41 +64. 8(Y1) 37.89'LT CREAP MYRTL 42+00 42+50 43+00 43+50 44+00 44+50 I 5 I I III � II m �� I I I X I I III ►- III IX X -c I 029-411-03 TRUDY 0. DANIEL (TRUSTEE U/T/D) I DB 17922 PG 566 I R, �y 4706 RIDGE RD III R I 41LT2.72 (Y1) 28.30' 18'HAR0 DWOOD 8 CEDAR e 22.34 42+00.LT5(Y1) ADJUST GV BY OTHERS / iGIN \ J I e e e e e e e ��EDAR e e e � / ASPHALT F Delve F F F F F OE \- OE M RAP DOGWOOD WOOD / I &.ID OE F �_. _ LF D E 0 LO CEDAR L� F F F 16.5' F F F F F F F F G jT/T/tel/T //T 0 7T/T 20:1 TAPER O 15:1 TAPER W w ADJUST MH PROP. PAINTED ISLAND 0 2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . PROP. 4' ASPHALT SHOULDER. Q F C C F F z J ----------- ----------- - - - - - - - - -- -- 029-315-49 -029-315-49 CARNELL S JR OAKES AND AUDREY A OAKES Q DB 25836 PG 148 4622 KINGSLAND CT ' 029-315-50 WILLIAM B. ALLEN AND SHA ' DB 13636 PG 7 4610 KINGSLAND - / 37' 45+00 M 796 792 788 784 780 776 772 768 45+32.15 .45+, 30 -30 ��--- �- --�-_ -- �0 LO --- -- -- -- - ---- -- -- -\� EklsT o Exist of � F F F 7 d Ld � Ob G G G 45 00 � R/W BY MAINTENANCE - END OF PROP. WIDENING ®STA 43+80.03(Y1) 5.53 -LT B O- N: 595741.39 E: 1470571.21 JUDGE "• -(Y 1)- I RESURFACING ®STA 43+98.82(Y1) -- - ----- ---- F F F F F C C C PROP. 5' S/W AT BACK OF RAMP END PROP. ASPH. SHOULDER AT STA. 41+99.21 (Y1) 31.73' RT.FTI 09DWIGHT DAVIS -315-09� \ 2 N R. ALLEN \ DB 23869 PG 469 \ 5937 WAVERLY LYNN LN CID / \ TIE INTO EX. S/W AT DW AS NEEDED DECORATIVE 41+14.29 (Y1) 38.11' LT. PROP. /W TREE DECORATIVE DECORATIVE ECORATIVE DECORATIVE TREE TREE TREE TREE \ \ O e O� - 0 OE - GE LF Wi N O N co � N C N IA 30 V) CEDAR LL s c Z START OF WIDENING ®STA. w 41+14.19(Y1) 4.50 -LT z x Z a LL LLl 20:1 � GTAPER G G G 41t00 v� Z 41' 41+50 41+73.8 (Y1) 34710 LT 41 +64. 8(Y1) 37.89'LT CREAP MYRTL 42+00 42+50 43+00 43+50 44+00 44+50 I 5 I I III � II m �� I I I X I I III ►- III IX X -c I 029-411-03 TRUDY 0. DANIEL (TRUSTEE U/T/D) I DB 17922 PG 566 I R, �y 4706 RIDGE RD III R I 41LT2.72 (Y1) 28.30' 18'HAR0 DWOOD 8 CEDAR e 22.34 42+00.LT5(Y1) ADJUST GV BY OTHERS / iGIN \ J I e e e e e e e ��EDAR e e e � / ASPHALT F Delve F F F F F OE \- OE M RAP DOGWOOD WOOD / I &.ID OE F �_. _ LF D E 0 LO CEDAR L� F F F 16.5' F F F F F F F F G jT/T/tel/T //T 0 7T/T 20:1 TAPER O 15:1 TAPER W w ADJUST MH PROP. PAINTED ISLAND 0 2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . PROP. 4' ASPHALT SHOULDER. Q F C C F F z J ----------- ----------- - - - - - - - - -- -- 029-315-49 -029-315-49 CARNELL S JR OAKES AND AUDREY A OAKES Q DB 25836 PG 148 4622 KINGSLAND CT ' 029-315-50 WILLIAM B. ALLEN AND SHA ' DB 13636 PG 7 4610 KINGSLAND - / 37' 45+00 M 796 792 788 784 780 776 772 768 45+32.15 .45+, 30 -30 ��--- �- --�-_ -- �0 LO --- -- -- -- - ---- -- -- -\� EklsT o Exist of � F F F 7 d Ld � Ob G G G 45 00 � R/W BY MAINTENANCE - END OF PROP. WIDENING ®STA 43+80.03(Y1) 5.53 -LT B O- N: 595741.39 E: 1470571.21 JUDGE "• -(Y 1)- I RESURFACING ®STA 43+98.82(Y1) -- - ----- ---- F F F F F C C C PROP. 5' S/W AT BACK OF RAMP END PROP. ASPH. SHOULDER AT STA. 41+99.21 (Y1) 31.73' RT.FTI 09DWIGHT DAVIS -315-09� \ 2 N R. ALLEN \ DB 23869 PG 469 \ 5937 WAVERLY LYNN LN CID / \ 1% I -w Monday, September 30, 2013 3:02:53 PM W O 0 0 N O N co � N C N IA t 0 M t0 F M M W v W LL s c Z o C o 0 R w y 'oo ° z x Z a LL w� a� 6��(D 9" w ~ay Fad w v� Z �0o azad � x - QI UujO LL U Ozz }tea � O c�wa U. z 0 CL CL x L) 9) w Q m w c� 0 z 0 i H Z= � V J H W Z �o � Q o N Ew- � Q N v O zll x a .a r� Ca 0 Inn m oI z O 0 V 0. _ 3 N LO �@• 8 cl� a a 00 00 WO �� O a LjLzj !� C) 1% I -w Monday, September 30, 2013 3:02:53 PM TRAFFIC CONTROL GENERAL NOTES A) ALL TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES SHALL CONFORM TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE MOST CURRENT EDITIONS OF THE CHARLOTTE DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION(CDOT) WORK AREA TRAFFIC CONTROL HANDBOOK(W.A.T.C.H.), THE MANUAL ON UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES(M.U.T.C.D.), THE NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION(NCDOT) SUPPLEMENT TO THE M.U.T.C.D., THE NCDOT ROADWAY STANDARD DRAWINGS AND THE CURRENT EDITION OF THE NCDOT STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR ROADS AND STRUCTURES. B) THE CONTRACTOR IS TO NOTIFY CDOT IN WRITING 10 WORKING DAYS IN ADVANCE OF ANY ROAD CLOSURE OR 5 WORKING DAYS PRIOR TO CLOSING ONE OR MORE TRAVEL LANES IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 3 OF THE W.A.T.C.H. HANDBOOK. C) ALL SIGNAL REVISIONS OR SHIFTS OF SIGNAL HEADS WILL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF CDOT; PRIOR TO REVISING TRAFFIC LANES WHICH REQUIRE SIGNAL REVISIONS, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE CDOT IMPLEMENTATION SECTION MANAGER (GUS JORDI / 336-7086) A MINIMUM OF 30 CALENDAR DAYS IN ADVANCE. TRAFFIC LANES SHALL NOT BE SHIFTED UNTIL THE REQUIRED SIGNAL REVISION / SHIFT IS COMPLETE AND READY FOR ACTIVATION. FOR NOTICES RELATED TO SIGNAL WORK REQUIRING NEW UTILITIES, REFER TO PROJECT NOTES. D) THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE REQUIRED TO FURNISH, INSTALL, RELOCATE, AND MAINTAIN ALL TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES, SIGNS, BARRICADES, WARNING AND/OR CHANNELIZING DEVICES FOR WORK SITES AND DETOUR ROUTES AS SHOWN IN TRAFFIC CONTROL PLANS UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED BY THE ENGINEER. E) CONSTRUCTION PHASING MAY DICTATE THAT TWO OR MORE TYPICAL W.A.T.C.H. DIAGRAMS OR STANDARDS BE USED IN ONE AREA OF CONSTRUCTION. CHANNELIZING DEVICES ASSOCIATED WITH THESE TYPICALS SHALL BE MOVED, SUPPLEMENTED, CHANGED, OR REMOVED AS NECESSARY TO COMPLY WITH THE CONSTRUCTION PHASING OF THE PLANS. THE LOCATION AND POSITIONING OF THESE DEVICES SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER TO ENSURE THAT THE MOTORIST DOES NOT RECEIVE FALSE INFORMATION WHEN TWO OR MORE TYPICALS AND/OR ROADWAY STANDARD DRAWINGS OVERLAP. F) CONTRACTOR SHOULD BE AWARE THAT WHEN THE CONSTRUCTION AREA IS IN OR NEAR A VERTICAL CREST OR HORIZONTAL CURVE, THE WORK AREA SHALL BE EXTENDED SO THAT LANE CLOSURE BEGINS IN ADVANCE OF THE CURVE AND MINIMUM STOPPING SIGHT DISTANCE IS MET. G) OFF-DUTY POLICE OFFICERS MAY BE REQUIRED AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER TO BE PRESENT FOR CONTROLLING TRAFFIC DURING CONSTRUCTION HOURS. H) THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MARK ALL HAZARDS WITHIN THE LIMITS OF THE PROJECT WITH WELL-MAINTAINED SIGNS, BARRICADES, WARNING AND/OR CHANNELIZING DEVICES. ON CONNECTING ROADS, ALL BARRICADES, SIGNS, WARNING, AND/OR CHANNELIZING DEVICES SHALL BE MOVED, SUPPLEMENTED, CHANGED, OR REMOVED AS REQUIRED DURING THE PROGRESS OF CONSTRUCTION AS APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER. 1) WORK ON THE PROJECT OR ANY SEPARATE ACTIVITY THEREIN SHALL NOT START UNTIL ALL OF THE REQUIRED SIGNS, BARRICADES, WARNING, AND/OR CHANNELIZING DEVICES ARE INSTALLED AND APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER. J) THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT GUS JORDI, IMPLEMENTATION SECTION MANAGER (704-336-7086) WITH THE CITY OF CHARLOTTE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (CDOT) TWO WEEKS PRIOR TO BEGINNING ANY WORK THAT WILL REQUIRE THE RELOCATION OR PLACEMENT OF SIGNS OR OTHER TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES BY THE CITY. K. THE CONTRACTOR MUST MAINTAIN DURING ALL PERIODS OF CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY THE ABILITY TO FLAG TRAFFIC USING QUALIFIED FLAGGERS WHEN NECESSARY OR REQUIRED L. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL TEMPORARY PAVEMENT MARKINGS AND ADDRESS CONFLICTING PAVEMENT MARKINGS IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 17 OF THE W.A.T.C.H. HANDBOOK OR AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN ANY EXISTING PAVEMENT MARKINGS UNLESS OTHERWISE DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER. M) THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN TWO WAY TRAFFIC ON ALL PORTIONS OF THIS PROJECT UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED IN THE PLANS, PROJECT NOTES, OR BY THE ENGINEER, N) CONTRACTOR WILL BE REQUIRED TO PROVIDE PROPERTY OWNERS AND TENANTS ACCESS TO THEIR PROPERTY THROUGHOUT THE PROJECT LIMITS, INCLUDING REASONABLE INGRESS AND EGRESS FOR BUSINESSES. SPECIAL ATTENTION SHALL BE PAID TO FIRE HYDRANTS. 0) THE CONTRACTOR IS TO NOTIFY (BY MAIL) ALL PROPERTY OWNERS AND OCCUPANTS WHO HAVE DIRECT ACCESS TO THE ROADWAY WITHIN THE PROJECT LIMITS A MINIMUM OF 5 AND A MAXIMUM OF 10 WORKING DAYS PRIOR TO INSTALLING TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES IN FRONT OF THOSE PROPERTIES. NOTIFICATIONS SHOULD INCLUDE CONTACT PERSONS NAME, TELEPHONE NUMBER, EMAIL ADDRESS, AND MAILING ADDRESS. P) THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PATROL THE WORK SITE AT THE BEGINNING AND END OF EACH WORK DAY (AT A MINIMUM) TO ENSURE THAT ALL TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES ARE IN PLACE AND FUNCTIONING PROPERLY. CONTRACTOR SHALL ENSURE THAT ALL TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES ARE IN PLACE AND FUNCTIONING AT ALL TIMES DURING PERIODS OF CONSTRUCTION INACTIVITY. Q) DURING PERIODS OF INACTIVITY OR AT NIGHT, EQUIPMENT SHALL NOT BE PARKED IN SUCH A MANNER AS TO BLOCK SIDEWALKS, TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES, OR THE MOTORISTS' VIEW OF TRAFFIC. EQUIPMENT SHALL BE AT LEAST 10 FEET AWAY FROM THE TRAVEL LANE. R) WHENEVER TRAFFIC MUST BE ROUTED ACROSS THE CENTERLINE DURING CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY, THE TWO OPPOSING DIRECTIONS MUST BE PHYSICALLY SEPARATED. TRAFFIC CONES CAN BE USED FOR THIS PURPOSE DURING DAYLIGHT HOURS; REFLECTORIZED CONES OR DRUMS MUST BE USED AT NIGHT. TRAFFIC SHALL NOT BE ROUTED ACROSS THE CENTERLINE DURING CONSTRUCTION INACTIVITY UNLESS PAVEMENT MARKING CONFLICTS ARE APPROPRIATELY ADDRESSED AND AGREEMENT ON REMOVAL OR NOT IS WORKED OUT WITH THE ENGINEER IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 16 OF THE W.A.T.C.H. HANDBOOK. IF THE ENGINEER APPROVES TRAFFIC TO CROSS THE CENTER LINE DURING CONSTRUCTION INACTIVITY, ONLY REFLECTORIZED DRUMS MUST BE USED. S) THE CITY ENGINEER OR DIRECTOR OF THE CHARLOTTE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OR THEIR APPOINTED REPRESENTATIVES ARE AUTHORIZED TO STOP ANY WORK WITHIN PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY THAT DOES NOT FOLLOW THIS TRAFFIC CONTROL PLAN OR REQUIREMENTS OF THE W.A.T.C.H. AND THE M.U.T.C.D. UNTIL SUCH REQUIREMENTS ARE MET. T) ADJACENT LANES TO CONSTRUCTION ZONES MAY REMAIN OPEN IF LATERAL CLEARANCE BETWEEN EDGE OF TRAVEL LANE AND EQUIPMENT IS EQUAL TO OR GREATER THAN 2 FEET (INCLUDING WIDTH OF DRUM). IF A DROPOFF EXISTS WITHIN THE WORK ZONE, CONTRACTOR SHOULD FOLLOW SECTION 10 OF THE W.A.T.C.H. HANDBOOK PERTAINING TO ADJACENT LANE CLOSURES DUE TO DROPOFFS. U) THE CONTRACTOR SHALL FOLLOW THE PHASING AS DESCRIBED HEREIN. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COMPLETE THE REQUIREMENTS OF EACH CONSTRUCTION PHASE IN SEQUENCE. WHEN A CONSTRUCTION PHASE IS DIVIDED INTO STEPS, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COMPLETE THE REQUIREMENTS OF EACH STEP IN SEQUENCE. (EXAMPLE: THE REQUIREMENTS OF PHASE I SHALL BE COMPLETED BEFORE PROCEEDING TO PHASE 11; THE REQUIREMENTS OF STEP 1 OF PHASE I SHALL BE COMPLETED BEFORE PROCEEDING TO STEP 2 OF PHASE 1). ALL WORK DESCRIBED IN THE PROJECT PHASING SHALL BE PERFORMED BY THE CONTRACTOR, EXCEPT WHERE IT IS SPECIFIED FOR CERTAIN WORK TO BE PERFORMED BY OTHERS. V) THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOT BE ALLOWED TO STOP TRAFFIC FOR MORE THAN 5 MINUTES AT A TIME IN ANY ONE DIRECTION. W) CONTRACTOR SHALL NOT BE ALLOWED TO WORK ON BOTH SIDES OF THE ROAD SIMULTANEOUSLY WITHIN THE SAME AREA EXCEPT WHERE THE ROADWAY IS DIVIDED BY A RAISED MEDIAN. IT WILL BE ACCEPTABLE TO CONSTRUCT BORE PITS ON EACH SIDE OF A ROADWAY FOR BORING UTILITIES UNDER THE ROADWAY UNLESS SUPERCEDED BY ENGINEER TO COMPLY WITH PEDESTRIAN REQUIREMENTS OR LATERAL CLEARANCE FROM TRAVEL LANES. X) THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PAY SPECIAL ATTENTION TO SECTION VII (PEDESTRIAN CONSIDERATIONS) OF THE W.A.T.C.H. TRAVELWAY I WORK ZONE DETAIL A PROJECT NOTES 1. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE AND INSTALL ALL FINAL PAVEMENT MARKINGS. CDOT SHALL PROVIDE AND INSTALL ALL FINAL SIGNAGE. (E&PM PM VERIFY WITH CDOT PM ON EVERY PROJECT) 2. CONTRACTOR SHALL ONLY WORK ON ONE CORNER OF AN INTERSECTION AT A TIME. 3. DURING THE HOURS OF 7:00 AM -9:00 AM AND 4:30 PM -6:30 PM MONDAY THRU FRIDAY CONSTRUCTION OR MAINTENANCE WORK WHICH INVOLVES CLOSURE OF A TRAVEL LANE WILL NOT BE ALLOWED ON THOROUGHFARE STREETS EXCEPT FOR EMERGENCY SITUATIONS OR WITH APPROVAL FROM CDOT. 4. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL LIMIT CONSTRUCTION TO ONE STREET AT A TIME, UNLESS OTHERWISE INSTRUCTED BY THE ENGINEER. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL LIMIT CONSTRUCTION TO ONE BLOCK EACH DAY IN ORDER TO DECREASE THE AMOUNT OF BACKFILL. CONSTRUCTION PHASING PHASE I: THE CONTRACTOR SHALE PLACE ALL CONSTRUCTION WARNING SIGNS ONE WEEK PRIOR TO THE BEGINNING OF WORK. THE APPROACH WARNING SIGNS SHALE BE PLACED ON PROSPERITY RIDGE RD, RIDGE RD, PROSPERITY VIEW DR, WAVERLY LYNN LN, AND SHALL REMAIN IN PLACE UNTIL CONSTRUCTION IS COMPLETED. PHASE II: THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CLOSE EXISTING RIDGE RD(Y1) FOR ONE WEEKEND ONLY FROM FRIDAY 6 PM TO MONDAY 6 AM IN ORDER TO CONSTRUCT THE PROPOSED WIDENING ON THE SOUTHERN SIDE OF RIDGE RD- (Y1) AS SHOWN ON TCP2. THE LOWERING OF THE EXISTING WATER EINE, INSTALLING THE DOWNSTREAM PORTION OF THE PROPOSED 10'x4' BOX CULVERT & ANY OTHER WORK SHOWN IN DIAGRAM B ON TCP2 FROM STA.33+50-STA.37+00. PHASE III: STEP 1: THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SHIFT TWO WAY TRAFFIC TO THE NEWLY CONSTRUCTED SOUTH SIDE OF RIDGE RD.(Y1) IN ACCORDANCE WITH W.A.T.C.H. HANDBOOK DIAGRAM 6. STEP 2: ONCE THIS HAS BEEN COMPLETED, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL FINISH THE REMAINING UPSTREAM SECTIONS OF THE PROPOSED 10'X4' BOX CULVERT ALONG RIDGE RD(Y1) & PROSPERITY RIDGE RD.(L1), ADDITIONAL WORK IN THIS STEP WILL INCLUDE THE REMAINING INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS ON THE NORTHERN SIDE OF RIDGE RD.(Y1) & PROSPERITY RIDGE RD(L1) AS SHOWN ON TCP2. THIS WILL INCLUDE SANITARY SEWER & GAS LINE ADJUSTMENTS, STORM DRAINAGE, CURB & GUTTER, SIDEWALK, ETC USING DIAGRAM C ON TCP2 PHASE IV: STEP 1: CONTRACTOR SHALL COMPLETE ADDITIONAL WORK ALONG RIDGE RD.(Y1) FROM STA: 36+51- STA.44+23, THIS WORK INCLUDES ASPHALT WIDENING, SIDEWALK, DRAINAGE, ETC. USING DIAGRAMS 1,3,4,5,6 W.A.T.C.H HANDBOOK. TWO LANES OF TRAVEL SHALL BE OPEN AT ALL TIMES WHEN THE F)'\.'TRACTOR IS NOT PRESENT AND DURING PEAK HOURS DESCRIBED IN PROJECT NOTES#19. PHASE V: STEP 1; THE CONTRACTOR SHALL GRADE, CONSTRUCT NEW PAVEMENT, CURB & GUTTER, STORM DRAINAGE, SIDEWALK, ETC. FROM (E1) STA.10+30-STA.14+75 USING DIAGRAMS 1,3,4,&5 OF THE WATCH HANDBOOK. PHASE VI: STEP 1: CONTRACTOR SHALL COMPLETE FINAL ASPHALT PAVING LAYER FOR ENTIRE PROJECT LIMITS AND THE PLACEMENT OF A MONOLITHIC ISLAND ALONG RIDGE RD -(Y1) FROM STA.34+30-39+47, ADVANCED WARNING SIGNS SHALL BE PLACED ACCORDING TO DIAGRAM 7 OF THE W.A.T.C.H. HANDBOOK. STEP 2: THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COMPLETE ALL PAVEMENT MARKINGS AS SHOWN ON SHEET PM1 FOR THE ENTIRE PROJECT LIMITS. I DIAGRAM 1 SIDEWALK CLOSURE 3N3H S$ON7 .. SIDEWALK- OYIHY wsan >txrlclaw DIAGRAM 2 WORK AREA ON SHOULDER (6' OR MORE FROM PAVEMENT) (40i I 6' MINIMUM NOTES: 1. NO ADVANCE SIGNING REQUIRED IF 5' OR MORE OF CLEARANCE IS MAINTAINED FROM EDGE OF PAVEMENT. 2, TYPE III BARRICADE IS REQUIRED ONLY IF WORK ZONE IS LEFT UNATTENDED OVERNIGHT. 3, SPACING - 35 M.P.H. OR LESS (SPACING) - ABOVE 35 M.P.H. DIAGRAM 4 WORK AREA ON SHOULDER (MINOR ENCROACHMENT ON PAVEMENT) DOWNSTREAM SIGNS TAPER VARIABLE p Y WORK AREA IN CENTER OF STREET 2 50' 100' (5) (2 5) (259) 1 (200') MENT MAR KINGS ARE REVISED, WORK AREA I O Pr I ON A Li WORK AREA IN CENTER OF STREET ISPACING) -ABOVE 35 M.P.H. I U 3. WHEN EXCAVATING WITHIN 4• OF THE EDGE (MAINTAINING 2 -WAY TRAFFIC) Q F-10 �f� BE CLOSED TO TRAFFIC USING OTHER I 6' MINIMUM NOTES: 1. NO ADVANCE SIGNING REQUIRED IF 5' OR MORE OF CLEARANCE IS MAINTAINED FROM EDGE OF PAVEMENT. 2, TYPE III BARRICADE IS REQUIRED ONLY IF WORK ZONE IS LEFT UNATTENDED OVERNIGHT. 3, SPACING - 35 M.P.H. OR LESS (SPACING) - ABOVE 35 M.P.H. DIAGRAM 4 WORK AREA ON SHOULDER (MINOR ENCROACHMENT ON PAVEMENT) DOWNSTREAM SIGNS TAPER VARIABLE BUFFER SHIFT WORK AREA IN CENTER OF STREET TAPER 50' 175' 125' (5) (2 5) (259) 1 ARROW PANEL MENT MAR KINGS ARE REVISED, WORK AREA 1 0 a 00 0 Q v 10' MINIMUM CLEARANCE I- 1 2D4' i (35U) NOTES: 1. IF TRAFFIC ENCROACHES INTO OPPOSING LANES. ADDITIONAL TRAFFIC CONTROLS ARE REQUIRED. SEE DIAGRAM 6 OR DIAGRAM 4. 2. SPACING - 35 M,P,H. OR LESS (SPACING) - ABOVE 35 M.P.H. 3, WHEN EXCAVATING WITHIN 4' OF THE EDGE OF PAVEMENT. THE ADJACENT LANE SHOULD BE CLOSED TO TRAFFIC USING OTHER APPLICABLE DIAGRAMS UNLESS BRACING OR SHORING IS USED. 4. TYPE III BARRICADE REQUIRED ONLY IF WORK ZONE IS LEFT UNATTENDED OVERNIGHT. ARROW PANEL DISPLAY (IF USED) DIAGRAM 18 SIGNS NOTES: TYPE III WORK AREA IN CENTER OF STREET ELARRICAOES CENTERLINE PAVEMENT MARKINGS SHALL BE DIAGRAM 7 (MULTI -LANE ROADWAY) WORK AREA 1 ARROW PANEL MENT MAR KINGS ARE REVISED, WORK AREA 2. SPACING - 35 M.P.H. WORK AREA IN CENTER OF STREET ISPACING) -ABOVE 35 M.P.H. ARROW PANEL 3. WHEN EXCAVATING WITHIN 4• OF THE EDGE (MAINTAINING 2 -WAY TRAFFIC) DOM4TRE" YARIPAI TAPER �f� BE CLOSED TO TRAFFIC USING OTHER {35(Y) IV ,{X7 fi...F.F 125' �� q I_'��'!'��- '2?T 20©' 200' ZC4 �� 4. TYPEIII BARRICADE REQUIRED ONLY IF WORK Dr3w TAPER BUFFER TAPER i 5O ZONE IS LEFT UNATTENDED OVERNIGHT. )500'} [350.) I (3S0' f a -, ,., N O N CO N i 61 E i n - �0' VARIABLE m u u- r `o M v M z w o W M hr m la z LU O :3 10' MINI6}UM CLEARANCE C CO a z R Q pm -' o % T =- o a a o v a ° 0 CL 10' MINIMUM CLEARAINC'E� 0- Lu W p a �n C ` O O ppQC� ~ J0a Lu 0 ® ¢z«s n � � E F 200' 200' 200' 225' 125' 100' rT� TYPE II i (35x1 (350'1 135a) ( I r_zal t 3 BARRICADE IAIEA F=F w f 1 ® TAPEdI DOYMSTREFM o l, V TAPER 47 � WRIP.pI-{ 110-1 xON 510EWALK YC CLOSED �0 _ NOTES: TYPE III BARR ICAOE R€OUIREO 3. IF CLOSURE. IS LONA-TERM ONLY IF WORK ZONE IS LEFT ISEE SECTION 16), PAVEMENT UNATTENDED OVERNIGHT. MARKINGS SHALL BE REVISED TO 2. $PACINQ - 35 NLP.H. OR IES$ MATCH THF. TRAFFIC PATTERN... {SPACINGI- ABOVE 35 M p FI. 0 F FI - - - J - DIAGRAM 6 TYPE II WORK AREA IN TRAVEL LANE BARRICADE a (MAINTAINING 2 -WAY TRAFFIC) I » o 11[ 10� &-CONES 10' -DRUMS OR BARRICADES C4 HGR we onaa slog NOTES: 1. IN HEAVY PEDESTRIAN AREAS THE ADJACENT LANE MAY NEED TO BE CLOSED TO MAINTAIN PEDESTRIAN TRAFFIC. CONES/DRUMS T SIGNS ® WORK AREA LEGEND T SIGNS NOTES: TYPE III 1 IF CLOSURE IS LONG-TERM (SEE SECTION 16), ELARRICAOES CENTERLINE PAVEMENT MARKINGS SHALL BE (OFF NOTE I, REVISEOTO MATCH TRAFFIC PATTERN. DRUMS WORK AREA 1 ARROW PANEL MENT MAR KINGS ARE REVISED, WORK AREA YIBUFFER NSTREAA7 I g PFR i> TAPER iI TAPER 700' VMIABLE 207 200' 176 as (296) (290") 1 [354Y) (359) tl�67 IORTIONALI 1779 0 1 o 010- 0 Q oq rho op" F► E' MINIMUM CLEARANCE 100 200' - 190' 1�5 VhRIA6Lt {2QD'j ,35Cn 13501 '50'1 LEGEND NOTES: CONESIUAUMS 1 IF CLOSURE IS LONG-TERM (SEE SECTION 16), MR W RAN EL CENTERLINE PAVEMENT MARKINGS SHALL BE DISPLAY {IPUSED) REVISEOTO MATCH TRAFFIC PATTERN. DRUMS BARRCA OE ON CENTERLINE ARE NOT REQUIRED IF PAVE- WORKAREA MENT MAR KINGS ARE REVISED, WORK AREA 2. SPACING - 35 M.P.H. ARROW PANEL ISPACING) -ABOVE 35 M.P.H. ARROW PANEL 3. WHEN EXCAVATING WITHIN 4• OF THE EDGE 200 OF PAVEMENT, THE ADJACENT LANE SHOULD (225'1 BE CLOSED TO TRAFFIC USING OTHER {35(Y) APPLICABLE DIAGRAMS UNLESS BRACING OR SHORING IS USED. 4. TYPEIII BARRICADE REQUIRED ONLY IF WORK ZONE IS LEFT UNATTENDED OVERNIGHT. I. o009000 4 �~ 10MINIMUM CLEARANCE. LEGEND C) LEGEND T CONESIUAUMS T SIGNS I -I III HTYPE BARRCA OE }\ WORKAREA 1 I f WORK AREA _ ARROW PANEL I. o009000 4 �~ 10MINIMUM CLEARANCE. LEGEND C) CONES/DRUMS T SIGNS T TYPE III I -I BARRICADE (SEE NOTE 2) }\ WORK AREA ,II WORK AREA �Ir ARROW PANEL <9> <@> 2DO' 240' (350') ARROW PANEL. DISPLAY (IF USED) 200' 2UU I 12$' SD VARIAKF 50' r 135Ci (3501 [140`) �s�o c3 NOTES: 1. PARKING ON BOTH SIDES 3. TYPE III BARRICADE REQUIRED OF STREET MUST BE PROHIE FFED ONLY IF WORK ZONE IS LEFT AS NECESSARY TO PROVIDE UNATTENDED OVERNIGHT. ADEQUATE TRAFFIC LANES. EMERGENCY NO PARKING SIGNS MAY SE OBTAINED FROM THE POLICE DEPARTMENT - 2. SPACING - 35 M,RH. OR LESS (SPACING) - ABOVE 35 M.P.H. SHIFT TAPER 125' 200, (25D) (350') q 2DO' ~ (350r) DIAGRAM 3 WORK AREA ON SHOULDER (2' TO 6' FROM PAVEMENT) o - 104 2' MIN, TO 6' MAX, FROM (200') EDGE OF PAVEMENT (OPTIONAL} I 1F ° Q o 0 a 0 0 20' 14D' I NOTES: 1. IF WORK AREA AND EQUIPMENT ARE CLOSER THAN 2' TO THE EDGE OF PAVEMENT, THEN USE OTHER APPLICABLE DIAGRAMS. 2. SPACING - 35 M.P.H. OR LESS (SPACING") -ABOVE 35 M.P.H. 3. WHEN EXCAVATING WITHIN 4' OF THE EDGE OF PAVEMENT. THE ADJACENT LANE SHCULD 8E CLOSED TO TRAFFIC USING OTHER APPLICABLE DIAGRAMS UNLESS BRACING OR SHORING IS USED. 4. TYPE III BARRICADE REQUIRED ONLY IF WORK ZONE IS LEFT UNATTENDED OVERNIGHT. DIAGRAM 5 WORK AREA ON SHOULDER (MINOR ENCROACHMENT NEAR INTERSECTION) Ot'3HV < > xTIOA T ouoll U MINIMUM (OPTIONA.L, CLEARANCE i II`, L.1 }g 0 Q 020'0 1D' I I I ARROW PANEL DISPLAY (IF USEDI 2W' (3W)' LEGEND Q LEGEND t`} CONES I DRUMS T SIGNS I -I TYPE III BARRICADE }\ (SEE NOTE 41 ><lr WORK AREA �Ir ARROWPANEL _ ARROW PANEL SHIFT TAPER 125' 200, (25D) (350') q 2DO' ~ (350r) DIAGRAM 3 WORK AREA ON SHOULDER (2' TO 6' FROM PAVEMENT) o - 104 2' MIN, TO 6' MAX, FROM (200') EDGE OF PAVEMENT (OPTIONAL} I 1F ° Q o 0 a 0 0 20' 14D' I NOTES: 1. IF WORK AREA AND EQUIPMENT ARE CLOSER THAN 2' TO THE EDGE OF PAVEMENT, THEN USE OTHER APPLICABLE DIAGRAMS. 2. SPACING - 35 M.P.H. OR LESS (SPACING") -ABOVE 35 M.P.H. 3. WHEN EXCAVATING WITHIN 4' OF THE EDGE OF PAVEMENT. THE ADJACENT LANE SHCULD 8E CLOSED TO TRAFFIC USING OTHER APPLICABLE DIAGRAMS UNLESS BRACING OR SHORING IS USED. 4. TYPE III BARRICADE REQUIRED ONLY IF WORK ZONE IS LEFT UNATTENDED OVERNIGHT. DIAGRAM 5 WORK AREA ON SHOULDER (MINOR ENCROACHMENT NEAR INTERSECTION) Ot'3HV < > xTIOA T ouoll U MINIMUM (OPTIONA.L, CLEARANCE i II`, L.1 }g 0 Q 020'0 1D' I I I ARROW PANEL DISPLAY (IF USEDI 2W' (3W)' LEGEND Q CCNESIDRUMS i SIGNS HTYPE III BARRCADE (SEE NOTE 4) }\ WORK AREA ><lr _ ARROWPANEL r owx ARROW PANEL CISPLAY NOTES_ (IF USED1 1. SPACING - 35 M.P.H. OR LESS 3. TYPE III BARRICADE REQUIRED (SPACING) -ABOVE 35 M.P.H- ONLY IF WORK ZONE IS LEFT 2. IF AN EXCAVATION IS TO BE MADE UNATTENDED OVERNIGHT. WITHIN 4' OF THE EDGE OF THE PAVEMENT THE LANE ADJACENT TO THE EXCAVATION SHOULD BE CLOSED USING OTHER APPLICABLE ILLUSTRATIONS. DIAGRAM 13 WORK AREA IN RIGHT LANE (MULTI -LANE ROADWAY) DOWNSTREAM CONES IDRUMS ---- SIGNS TAPER MERGE BARRICADES VARIABLE BUFFIER I TAPER WORK AREA l � 1 100' 125' 225' 20Y 200' 200 (225'1 (500') {35(Y) 20' - Q I - - - 0 O 0-0 O ----- - - 0 CA 10' MINIMUM CLEARANCE - - LEGEND V CONES IDRUMS -j SIGNS TYPE III BARRICADES ISEE NOTE 3) WORK AREA l � 1 r 200' i 350') n N OTE S: 1. ROADWAYS WITH MEDIANS REQUIRE A SECOND SET OF SIGNS C2, C10R, 8 C12H PLACED IN THE MEDIAN. 2. SPACING - 35 M.P.H- OR LESS (SPACING) - 40 - 45 M.P.H. 3. IF CLOSURE IS LONG-TERM (SEE SECTION 16), THE PAVEMENT MARKINGS SHALL BE REVISED TO MATCH THE TRAFFIC PATTERN. 4. TYPE III BARRICADE REQUIRED ONLY IF WORK ZONE IS LEFT UNATTENDED OVERNIGHT. An P 0 W PamEL D15PLAY LEGEND © CONESIDRUMS T SIGNS TYPE III BARRICADE {SEE NOTE 61 WORK AREA l � 1 _ ARROW PANEL Wednesday, September 25, 2013 3:10:28 PM w N O N CO N i 61 E i n - N N 9 -. m u u- r `o M v M z w o W M hr m la z LU O :3 ;; EX O C CO a z R Q o v a LL m r(L o Lu CL 0- Lu W p a �n C ~ J0a Lu 0 ® ¢z«s CC p" Uwo _ U-Wz u Ozz a r0a F- ® clava fly �'Il z 0 1- a c� w r r 0 z QL Z C® A. W� /� L Z O Im m F- ¢ Z A J Q w W N Q x c.� x 0. w w 0 ¢ U 0 0 C) V 4-1 a 3 J� N O Lo a ¢ �z W � CO � A 00O )moi V O a(4.) f� O � W 0 Wednesday, September 25, 2013 3:10:28 PM DIAGRAM A 3 � I III III I CONTRACTOR TO PLACE THE FOLLOWING DURING THIS PHASE: ss I I III III I y% 3 3 3 3 3 —HEADWALL, LF OF BOX CULVERT, AND SD BOX#2 �\ 13 �I III III —INSTALL NEW WV'S FOR EX 16 WL III III I 55 —INSTALL NEW C&G ALONG FROM STA. 34+50-35+75 3 3 A 3 S5 3 _ N / N o N N 00 N t0 \ I o w' 16 M M Z N W N I I L0 r o V.2 o W . • o C C7 Ne Z ai Q W x Z NN II m I to .2 ao Q o c = ILL a I cc ~o _ L = \ • N �+ U W 0 a � Z a \ \ Q• Lu 0«sw 2 =zo R vWZ uozZ \ \\ 0!= W In \ IE E —� E E m \ 8 \ \ — — — — — — L \ —gin ------- ---- ---- — �---- \ gs \ SS Ss — — — — — — — \ sS I I — — ss — — — —_ — — — — — — — — — -- — — — — — — — _ — — — — z SS a 30 � � 59 95 59 I s 00 G 0 SS 59 SS 591—�� SS SS SS 59 55 SS SS - G� _ I G D' W — (Yl)— RIDGE RD. _ tE "E WW48.4 3 33.0 - - - - - - - - W W W W W W W W W W W W W tfi" WATER W W W W W W W W W W W T W W MAIN BIKE LANE N — — SIDEWAEWA=K \ �\ \ /� o / \ ._ DIAGRAM B E LEGEND p� E ® E CONES/BARRELS Q CONTRACTOR TO PLACE THE FOLLOWING DURING THIS PHASE: o \ — —ROAD CLOSURE FOR RIDGE RD — — — —,W Z C —INSTALL 10'x4' BOX CULVERT ACROSS RIDGE RD. EX. S'W — — — — — — — — — — — — — BARRICADES c°i —LOWER 16" WATER LINE — — — — — — — - -ADJUST/LOWER ANY OTHER UTILITIES SHOWN IN DIAGRAM B HATCHING REFERENCES WORK AREA J N 33400 — — pa--- ---- 36 0— -------a7 0-- W W WW WATER W MAIN W W \ W W W T W W W PJ B O - %Ag- 3— Ir- 0 Ew- \ < W I I X' I IWi z a w CONTRACTOR TO PLACE TEMPORARY DIAGRAM C II DOUB STRIPINGca E YELLOWC NTER LINE) od a CONTRACTOR TO PLACE THE FOLLOWING DURING THIS PHASE: - I 3 0 —SHIFT TRAFFIC TO RIGHT SIDE OF RIDGE RD. AS SHOWN IN -= \ m Wa. DIAGRAM C \ _ _ 'o 0. —INSTALL THE REMAINING SECTIONS OF 10'x4' BOX CULVERT AND ANY OTHER ADJACENT STORN DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS \ \ m o —RELOCATE SS LINE e —CONSTRUCT C&G PAVEMENT WIDENING ETC. ALONG LEFT �e�� CONTRACTOR TO PLACE I I III II' SIDE OF RIDGE RD. ' �� TEMPORARY STRIPING (SEE TCP1) I I III E E III 11 � W � ►-� E (DOUBLE YELLOW CENTER LINE) -- -- - - --- - --- \7'i �_- --- - - - - A 3p 00 / I MSI TAPE: BACIf 7p dry O O BIKE LANE _ � SALK IDEW SIDEWA_=K i CONTRACTOR TO GRIND EXISTING �� / PAVEMENT MARKINGS AS NEEDED Wednesday, September 25, 2013 3:07:29 PM i i u J TIE INTO EX. PAV'T MARKINGS AT \ TSTA. 30+00(Y1) \ BIKE LANE R3-17 24" x 18" ENDS R3 -176P 24" x 8" I II I I I II I I I II I I I II I I III I I — TI TB TU rLAR N0 NY AARKING TIME LL R7 -1R T L65TE Till TT TI UA T2 100' @r— F, D — — — — SIDEWALK YIELD \ TD / f W3-9 36" x 36" R1-2 I I�rf 30" x 30" x 30" /I / / TB /$1+02.42 N I 0 M LL Q 18.2' w LL TI Z TELL _ — — — —— — — — — — LL ilii////////ilii/i/////ii ii/✓✓✓iii�iirriiii 0 — - — — — ------ —-------� I PAVEMENT MARKING AND MARKER NOTES: 1. THE WORK COVERED HEREIN SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CURRENT EDITIONS OF NCDOT ROADWAY STANDARD DRAWINGS AND THE MANUAL ON UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES (MUTCD). 2. CONTRACTOR SHALL SUPPLY, INSTALL, AND FURNISH ALL PERMANENT PAVEMENT MARKINGS AS REQUIRED DURING CONSTRUCTION OPERATIONS. 3. CONTRACTOR SHALL SUPPLY AND INSTALL PERMANENT RAISED REFLECTIVE PAVEMENT MARKERS AS DESCRIBED BY NCDOT STDS. 1250.01 AND 1251.01. 4. ALL PROPOSED PERMANENT REGULATORY AND WARNING SIGNS ARE TO BE INSTALLED BY CDOT. ALL EXISTING SIGNS ARE TO BE RELOCATED OR REMOVED BY `CDOT. R7 -11- 12" 7-1L12" x 18" 10.5' ��IJIX — n — — -- — -------------------- ---- N IME R7 -1L MATCH LINE STA.18+65(-L1-) SEE VIEWPORT ABOVE / TD I V SIDEWALK TE TI Ilj ill i i III III Ixl III,: x III IFI IIh � III I I III VIII I I ON/ ll lg"i rr rr A B 1 '11111110- J Lf) J LLJ + W 00 Q CK �0 V) Q- 3.1 LLJ LLJ Z> J LLJ = LLJ U fn RIGHT LAN BEGIN MUST RIGHAN TURN RIGH YBLD TO BIKE li II I I I I II R3 -7R R4-4 W3-9 R4-7 l II II� 30" x 30"36" x 30" 36" x 36" 24" x 30" / �y \ F —— — — — — — — —----------— — — — — — ----- - — — — — — — — — — =1 L _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _� TB TD — — a n o ilo ilo ilo ilo _ UA r n A:24" x B.36" aHSE 4` t !, DETAIL FOR YEILD LINE TRIANGLES FIGURE 3B-14, MUTCD 2003 Edition MUTCD PIANO STYLE CROSSWALK DETAIL Standard: Wh Ik I; d +11, Lane Width (L) Lane Width (L) Lane Width (L) Lane Width (L) L/2 L/2 L/2 L/2 L/2 L/2 TB Gap en Crosswa Ines are use , ey shall consist of solid white lines that mark the crosswalk. They shall be not less than 150 mm (6 in) nor greater than 600 mm (24 in) in width. Guidance: If transverse lines are used to mark a crosswalk, the gap between the lines should not be less than 1.8 m (6 ft). If diagonal or longitudinal lines are used without transverse lines to mark a crosswalk, the crosswalk should not be less than 1.8 m (6 ft) wide. 8" Solid White Guidance: If used, the diagonal or longitudinal th of Sidewalk, lines should be 300 to 600 mm (12 to reater (but not 24 in) wide and spaced 300 to 1500 eyond edge of mm (12 to 60 in) apart. The marking DESCRIPTION 8. TOTAL QUANTITIES TA WHITE EDGE LINE 10' Min. or wid 1,020 LF TB Gap 6" SOLID WHITE LINE (THERMOPLASTIC 90 MILS) 4,145 LF TC whichever is g 4" 10' WHITE SKIP LINE (THERMOPLASTIC 120 MILS) 24" (Typ) 2 FT WHITE MINISKIP 4" X 2' WHITE LANE LINE MINI SKIP (10' GAP) — (THERMOPLASTIC 120 MILS) 1,685 LE more than 1'b WHITE SOLID LANE LINE T P) 1,130 LF TI YELLOW DOUBLE CENTER LINE 4" YELLOW DOUBLE CENTER LINE (THERMOPLASTIC — 120 MILS) ram accessible ra design should avoid the wheel paths, and the spacing should not exceed 2.5 times the line width. CDOT Traffic Safety March 28, 2008 I / I � O ff) LLJ + m — — — — — — Ch Q � H 0 V) LLJ LLJ Z5: J LLJ = LLJ U V) SYMBOL DESCRIPTION PAY ITEM TOTAL QUANTITIES TA WHITE EDGE LINE 4" SOLID WHITE EDGELINE (THERMOPLASTIC 90 MILS) 1,020 LF TB BIKE LANE LINE 6" SOLID WHITE LINE (THERMOPLASTIC 90 MILS) 4,145 LF TC 10 FT WHITE SKIP 4" 10' WHITE SKIP LINE (THERMOPLASTIC 120 MILS) 525 LF TD 2 FT WHITE MINISKIP 4" X 2' WHITE LANE LINE MINI SKIP (10' GAP) — (THERMOPLASTIC 120 MILS) 1,685 LE TE WHITE SOLID LANE LINE 4" SOLID WHITE LANE LINE (THERMOPLASTIC — 120 MILS) 1,130 LF TI YELLOW DOUBLE CENTER LINE 4" YELLOW DOUBLE CENTER LINE (THERMOPLASTIC — 120 MILS) 2,145 LF TT YELLOW DIAGONAL LINE 12" YELLOW DIAGONAL LINE (THERMOPLASTIC — 90 MILS) 375 LE TU WHITE DIAGONAL 8" SOLID WHITE LINE @45° (THERMOPLASTIC —90 MILS) 100 LF TV WHITE CROSSWALK LINE 8" SOLID WHITE LINE (THERMOPLASTIC 120 MILS) 1,560 LF T2 WHITE STOP BAR 24" SOLID WHITE STOP BAR (THERMOPLASTIC — 120 MILS) 65 LE U BIKE SYMBOL BIKE SYMBOL (THERMOPLASTIC — 90 MILS) 10 EA UA LEFT TURN ARROW LEFT WHITE TURN ARROW (THERMOPLASTIC — 90 MILS) 12 EA UB RIGHT TURN ARROW RIGHT WHITE TURN ARROW (THERMOPLASTIC — 90 MILS) 7 EA PAVEMENT MARKER CRYSTAL/RED PAVEMENT MARKER 68 EA ♦ PAVEMENT MARKER YELLOW/YELLOW PAVEMENT MARKER 12 EA WOOFt 1 Tuesday, October 01, 2013 3:41:53 PM W O � N N N CIO � N Q1 p L i0 op tD F R �� <� Z LL "O W U, M. Iw o " Z Q W % O Z o +% m Q to .2 a0. �0. r �o U LL' Q+ ~ jL F -r ��sw CA ii Z p 0 Q Z atS ly a UWZ 2 LL OWZ V Z 0 L�w0. m z 0 r 0. U to m D O z 0 Zo �0 i O L16 O W� Z IL QO o ^, � J "I � O N w E^ U o F- 0. -P LTJ IL) Q U O Q O m C i 0 C4 C� N J to 0. Q w u� � w t� a w � w O WOOFt 1 Tuesday, October 01, 2013 3:41:53 PM GENERAL NOTES: 1. AREA UNDER EMBANKMENT SHALL BE CLEARED, GRUBBED, AND STRIPPED OF ANY VEGETATION AND ROOT MATERIAL. THE BASIN AREA SHALL BE CLEARED. 2. THE FILL MATERIAL FOR THE EMBANKMENT SHALL BE FREE OF ROOTS OR OTHER WOODY VEGETATION AS WELL AS OVERSIZED STONES, ROCKS, ORGANIC MATERIAL OR OTHER OBJECTIONABLE MATERIAL. THE EMBANKMENT SHALL BE COMPACTED BY TRAVERSING WITH EQUIPMENT WHILE BEING CONSTRUCTED. SPILLWAYS SHOULD NOT BE CONSTRUCTED THROUGH FILL SECTIONS. ALL SPILLWAYS SHOULD BE LINED AND/OR RIPRAPPED. 3. SEDIMENT SHALL BE REMOVED AND TRAP RESTORED TO ITS ORIGINAL DIMENSIONS WHEN THE SEDIMENT HAS ACCUMULATED TO DEPTH SHOWN ON STANDARD. REMOVED SEDIMENT SHALL BE DEPOSITED IN A SUITABLE AREA IN SUCH A MANNER THAT IT WILL NOT ERODE. 4. THE TRAP SHALL BE INSPECTED AFTER EACH RAIN AND REPAIRS MADE AS NECESSARY. 5. CONSTRUCTION OPERATION SHALL BE CARRIED OUT IN SUCH A MANNER THAT EROSION AND WATER POLLUTION IS MINIMIZED. 6. ALL CUT AND FILL SLOPES SHALL BE 2:1 OR FLATTER, UNLESS CERTIFIED BY REGISTERED GEOTECHICAL ENGINEER. 7. SEDIMENT BASIN EMBANKMENTS SHOULD BE PROVIDED WITH EROSION CONTROL AND STABILIZATION. 8. STORAGE AREA MAY BE CONSTRUCTED IN ANY SHAPE PROVIDED THE MINIMUM STORAGE VOLUME REQUIREMENT IS MET. THE BASIN SHOULD ALSO BE ORIENTED SUCH THAT THE FILTER AND THE MAIN FLOW OF WATER AND SEDIMENT ARE ON OPPOSITE ENDS ON THE LONGER BASIN DIMENSIONS. 9. THE LENGTH OF THE STONE OUTLET (SPILLWAY) IS TO BE BASED ON A 10 YEAR STORM. 10. WHENEVER TOPOGRAPHY ALLOWS, THE BASIN LENGTH SHOULD BE TWICE (2X) THE BASIN WIDTH, TO ALLOW FOR SETTLING. BAFFLES SHALL BE INSTALLED IN ALL BASINS. 11. CLEANOUT STAKES SHALL BE PLACED IN ALL SEDIMENT BASINS AT THE LOW POINT IN THE BASIN. THE STAKES SHALL BE MARKED SHOWING THE HALF FULL, CLEANOUT POINT, OF THE BASIN. 12. SAFETY FENCING 3' HIGH SHOULD BE PLACED AROUND ALL SEDIMENT BASINS. 13. FOR DESIGN OF SEDIMENT BASINS, REFER TO THE NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES, EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLANNING AND DESIGN MANUAL. 14. FOR SLOPES GREATER THAN 10' IN LENGTH AND PROTECTED BY SILT FENCE AT THE TOE OF THE SLOPE, SLOPE TERRACING WILL BE REQUIRED. 15. THE BERM ON SEDIMENT BASINS SHALL BE SEEDED ONCE FINAL GRADE HAS BEEN REACHED. THE SILT FENCE MAY BE REMOVED IF PERMISSION HAS BEEN GRANTED BY THE CITY LAND DEVELOPMENT INSPECTOR AFTER THE GRASS HAS GERMINATED AND STABLE GROUND HAS BEEN ESTABLISHED. 16. WASHED STONE AND WIRE BACKING SHALL BE USED WITH SILT FENCE WHENEVER SILT FENCE IS PLACE AT THE TOE OF A SLOPE >10' VERTICAL OR ALONG ANY CHANNEL OR WATER COURSE WHERE 50' OF BUFFER IS NOT PROVIDED. • CITY OF CHARLOTTE LAND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS C[LIRLOTTE. INCLUDES CHARLOTTE ETJ GENERAL NOTES: 1. UNIFORMLY GRADE A SHALLOW DEPRESSION APPROACHING THE INLET. 2. DRIVE 5 -FOOT STEEL POSTS 2 FEET INTO THE GROUND SURROUNDING THE INLET. SPACE POSTS EVENLY AROUND THE PERIMETER OF THE INLET, A MAXIMUM OF 4 FEET APART. 3. SURROUND THE POSTS WITH WIRE MESH HARDWARE CLOTH. SECURE THE WIRE MESH TO THE STEEL POSTS AT THE TOP, MIDDLE, AND BOTTOM. PLACING A 2 -FOOT FLAP OF THE WIRE MESH UNDER THE GRAVEL FOR ANCHORING IS RECOMMENDED. 4. PLACE CLEAN GRAVEL (NC DOT #5 OR #57 STONE) ON A 2:1 SLOPE WITH A HEIGHT OF 16 INCHES AROUND THE WIRE, AND SMOOTH TO AN EVEN GRADE. 5. ONCE THE CONTRIBUTING DRAINAGE AREA HAS BEEN STABILIZED, REMOVE ACCUMULATED SEDIMENT, AND ESTABLISH FINAL GRADING ELEVATIONS. 6. COMPACT THE AREA PROPERLY AND STABILIZED IT WITH GROUNDCOVER. GENERAL NOTES SEDIMENT BASINS NCDOT #5 OR WASHED S NCDOT #5 OR WASHED S ex CITY OF CHARLOTTE LAND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS CHARLOTTE. I INCLUDES CHARLOTTE ETJ 4' MAX. HARDWARE CLOTH AND GRAVEL INLET PROTECTION 30.03B 1 3 19 -GAUGE HARDWARE CLOTH (J" MESH OPENINGS) NOT TO SCALE 30.09 1 1 0 STE^ ^^ ' 6' MAX. WOVEN FILTER FABRIC GENERAL NOTES: 1. WOVEN FILTER FABRIC BE USED WHERE SILT FENCE IS TO REMAIN FOR A PERIOD OF MORE THAN 30 DAYS. 2. STEEL POSTS SHALL BE 5'-0" IN HEIGHT AND BE OF THE SELF -FASTENER ANGLE STEEL TYPE. 3. TURN SILT FENCE UP SLOPE AT ENDS. 4. ORANGE SAFETY FENCE IS REQUIRED AT BACK OF SILT FENCE WHEN GRADING IS ADJACENT TO SWIM BUFFERS, STREAMS OR WETLANDS (REFER TO SWIM BUFFER GUIDELINES). THE COLOR ORANGE IS RESERVED FOR VISUAL IDENTIFICATION OF ENVIRONMENTALLY SENSITIVE AREAS. 5. DRAINAGE AREA CAN NOT BE GREATER THAN 1/4 ACRE PER 100 FT OF FENCE. 6. SLOPE LENGTHS CAN NOT EXCEED CRITERIA SHOWN IN TABLE 6.62A NORTH CAROLINA EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLANNING AND DESIGN MANUAL. 7. DO NOT INSTALL SEDIMENT FENCE ACROSS STREAMS, DITCHES, WATERWAYS OR OTHER AREAS OF CONCENTRATED FLOW. STEEL POST z FILTER FABRIC w J U Q o a FLOW 1L- 1T(I � z I I I III III=� III 111�� III 1T �= I�I�I I IIIA III -III II Ilr I -1i III R= A, 03 74°MIN. MAINTENANCE NOTES: 1. FILTER BARRIERS SHALL BE INSPECTED BY THE FINANCIALLY RESPONSIBLE PARTY OR HIS AGENT IMMEDIATELY AFTER EACH RAINFALL AND AT LEAST DAILY DURING PROLONGED RAINFALL. ANY REPAIRS NEEDED SHALL BE MADE IMMEDIATELY. 2. SHOULD THE FABRIC DECOMPOSE OR BECOME INEFFECTIVE PRIOR TO THE END OF THE EXPECTED USABLE LIFE AND THE BARRIER STILL IS NECESSARY, THE FABRIC SHALL BE REPLACED PROMPTLY. 3. SEDIMENT DEPOSITS SHOULD BE REMOVED WHEN DEPOSITS REACH APPROX. HALF THE HEIGHT OF THE BARRIER. ANY SEDIMENT DEPOSITS REMAINING IN PLACE AFTER THE SILT FENCE IS REMOVED SHALL BE DRESSED TO CONFORM TO THE EXISTING GRADE, PREPARED AND SEEDED. SECT ON NOT TO SCARF • CITY OF CHARLOTTE o • CITY OF CHARLOTTE LAND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS TEMPORARY SET E E N C ESTD. No. REV. LAND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS CHARLOTTE_ INCLUDES CHARLOTTE ETJ 30.06A 4 CHARLOTTE. INCLUDES CHARLOTTE ETJ NOTES 1. INLET MAINTENANCE SHALL BE DOCUMENTED IN PROJECT LOG BOOK. FILTER TYPES SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE CITY INSPECTOR PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. 3: FILTER BAGS MAY BE REMOVED WHEN SITE IS STABILIZED AT THE DIRECTION OF THE ENGINEER. 4. FILTER BAGS SHALL BE REMOVED PRIOR TO STREET ACCEPTANCE. 5. FILTER BAGS SHALL BE CLEANED OR REPLACED ON A REGULAR HOOD BASIS (NOT BE MORE THAN HALE FULL AT ANY TIME). 6. FILTER BAGS SHALL NOT BE ALLOWED IN EXISTING CITY OR NCDOT ROADS. GRATE 1" REBAR FOR REMOVAL FROM FILTER E DUMP LC CATCH BAS DEFLECTOR DUTLET N S TA L- EAT 0 N NOT TO SCALE CATCH BAS N N PET PROTECT ON NOTES MAINTENANCE PLAN 1. MALLARD WATERSHEDS CLASS C, INDEX X11-137-9 1. ALL TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES WILL BE INSTALLED AS NOTED ON THE CLDSM DETAILS FOR EROSION CONTROL AND THE EROSION CONTROL PLANS. 2. DISTURBED AREA - 5.5t ACRES 3. SOIL TYPES: CECIL SANDY CLAY LOAM, MECKLENBURG FINE SANDY LOAM, HELENA SANDY LOAM 2. TRAPPED SEDIMENT SHALL BE PROMPTLY REMOVED FROM THE EROSION CONTROL MEASURES AND DISPOSED OF. 4. STABILIZATION IS THE BEST FORM OF EROSION CONTROL. ALL DISTURBED AREAS WILL BE STABILIZED WITH THE APPROPRIATE 3. PERMANENT VEGETATIVE EROSION CONTROL MEASURE(S) WITHIN THE REQUIRED TIME FRAME: ALL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES MUST BE INSPECTED WEEKLY AND AFTER RAINFALL EVENTS. NEEDED REPAIRS MUST BE MADE IMMEDIATELY. PERIMETER DIKES, SWALES, DITCHES AND SLOPES 7 DAYS HIGH QUALITY WATER ZONES 7 DAYS SLOPES STEEPER THAN 3:1 7 DAYS VEGETATIVE PLAN SLOPES GREATER THAN 50FT IN LENGTH REGARDLESS OF SLOPE 7 DAYS 1. ALL DISTURBED AREAS WILL BE STABILIZED BY PERMANENTLY VEGETATING WITH SEED AND MULCH AS SLOPES 3:1 OR FLATTER AND LESS THAN 50FT IN LENGTH 14 DAYS RECOMMENDED BY THE PERMANENT SEEDING SPECIFICATIONS DUE TO THE RESTRAINTS ON THE LENGTH ALL OTHER AREAS WITH SLOPES FLATTER THAN 4:1 14 DAYS OF IMPROVEMENTS AND/OR DURATION OF EXPOSED DISTURBED AREA. 5. ANY GRADING BEYOND THE CONSTRUCTION LIMITS SHOWN ON THE PLANS IS A VIOLATION OF THE NORTH CAROLINA EROSION 2. TO PROMOTE A DENSE VEGETATIVE COVER IN AREAS WHERE RUNOFF CONCENTRATES OR IN AREAS CONTROL ORDINANCE AND IS SUBJECT TO A FINE. WHERE VEGETATION IS HARD TO ESTABLISH, A MATTING FOR EROSION CONTROL SHALL BE USED. THE MATTING TO BE USED WILL BE A MATTING THAT CONSISTS OF 70% STRAW AND 30% COCONUT AND BE 6. NO ON-SITE BURIAL OF VEGETATION OR CONSTRUCTION DEBRIS WILL BE PERMITTED. BACKED (OR APPROVED EQUAL). THE MATTING FOR EROSION CONTROL WILL BE CONSTRUCTED AS PART OF THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS AND SHALL ALSO SERVE FOR VEGETATIVE STABILIZATION PURPOSES. 7. ADDITIONAL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES MAY BE REQUIRED IN THE FIELD BY THE CONSTRUCTION INSPECTOR. 8. ALL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES MUST BE INSPECTED WEEKLY AND AFTER RAINFALL EVENTS. NEEDED REPAIRS CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE MUST BE MADE IMMEDIATELY. 1. OBTAIN PLAN APPROVAL AND OTHER APPLICABLE PERMITS. 9. REFER TO THE CONSTRUCTION PLANS, PROFILES, AND DETAILS FOR SPECIFIC DESIGN INFORMATION FOR THE ROADWAY AND 2. HOLD PRE -CONSTRUCTION CONFERENCE AT LEAST ONE WEEK PRIOR TO BEGINNING CONSTRUCTION. DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS. 3. FLAG THE CONSTRUCTION LIMITS AND INSTALL TREE PROTECTION. 10. INLET PROTECTION IS REQUIRED FOR ALL INLETS LOCATED IN THE WORKING AREA AND IS REQUIRED FOR ALL PHASES OF THE PROJECT UNTIL THE DISTURBED AREA IS FULLY STABILIZED. 4. ALL DITCH SECTIONS SHALL BE STABILIZED FOR EROSION CONTROL MEASURES 11. WHEN PLACING EXCAVATED SOIL ON PAVEMENT, FIRST COVER PAVEMENT WITH TARP, SAND, OR SCREENINGS. 5. INSTALL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES REQUIRED FOR THE PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES. 12. THE MAXIMUM LINEAR FEET OF DITCH WORK THAT CAN BE EXCAVATED BEFORE REQUIRED STABILIZATION IS 200 LF. 6. CONSTRUCT THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS AS SHOWN ON THE PLANS AND AS NOTED IN THE � CONSTRUCTION PHASING LISTED ON SHEET TCP1. 13. INSTALL STORM DRAINAGE AND OTHER PERMANENTLY STABILIZED DITCHES AND DRIVEWAY PIPES THAT WILL CONVEY m SURFACE WATER DOWNSTREAM OF THE SITE, FIRST. 7. DISTURBANCE AREAS SHALL BE LIMITED TO ONE DRAINAGE AREA AT A TIME WHENEVER POSSIBLE. 14. ALL STOCKPILE AREAS DEEMED NECESSARY BY THE CONTRACTOR WILL BE REQUIRED TO HAVE EROSION CONTROL 8. AFTER EACH WORKDAY, PROTECT ROADWAY BASE WITH ABC OR BY COMPACTION. MEASURES SURROUNDING THE AREA. THE STOCKPILE AREAS MAY ONLY BE LOCATED WITHIN THE CONSTRUCTION LIMITS. APPROPRIATE EROSION CONTROL MEASURES CONSIST OF TEMPORARY SILT FENCE, TEMPORARY DIVERSION DITCH, SEDIMENT 9. INSPECT THE EROSION CONTROL MEASURES WEEKLY AND AFTER EVERY RAINFALL. MAKE ANY TRAP, ETC. NEEDED REPAIRS. 15. THE CONTRACTOR IS REQUIRED TO PREVENT EROSION AND SEDIMENT FROM DEPOSITION ON LOCAL ROADS BY PROVIDING 10. ONCE THE ENTIRE DRAINAGE AREA IS PERMANENTLY STABILIZED, REMOVE ALL TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE/EXITS. REFER TO CLDSM 30.11A - STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE. EROSION CONTROL MEASURES. EROSION CONTROL NOTES 30.15 N O N O N 01 2, r O` Ml0 I- M M M z LLG t o v o t9 .. W Z Q C X z 0 A Q c a ILLL H0 C� U W a� a W 0 U) ai W Qn 2 Q z ca .� Q VWZ a v Ozz Z RE6, �(D< vwa04 O z H z O i H Z= � V i H W :3 /� o L O 0 m M ¢ J N o U 0 Tuesday, October 01, 2013 2:42:03 PM x r a w Q L) m m 0 0 C6 z c 0 � 3 m L0 Tuesday, October 01, 2013 2:42:03 PM A II 3O— OE� OE pF DE p l l �IIIYI / ..lool—_ _—---- — iii I I III — _�_ _ _ -------------ool — — — — — — — _ 1 _ J'00, 1,01113 _-- r �,___ _ --C \ —�— — _ ,,00 \16100 MATCH LINE STA.18+65(—L1—) SEE BELOW FOR RIDGE RD (—Y1—) USE EROSION CONTROL I IIII I III IXC MATTING AS NEEDED II I x111 _ WHEN RE Di G DITCH .-. � I — F 1-1 > F ' J m O� 1 OE —/ F _ v T- Ali .Y / OE 30— 3 F 30 •, _moo- - - �D_ - - - -30_ 3O �\ ,_ -_ 3 _ ___�— �r / -------- \ _------`-- —__— —c QG F - _r F` IF I `fes O G �T��T�T�� rT4 T�7�� n T� T��4 G G 45 1 WW i / Z> _ � I W �iiiiiiiii _ — — C F F % / F F c� HEN REGRADING DITCH CL 7681 o \ i N, BUILD /61", a 0 /W m W W V) e--\ QOf �O cf)CL 3-1 W W z_> J W = W U N Tuesday, October 01, 2013 2:34:39 PM W O N 0 N 0 N ` 01 -w C N � y C R �"� M " Z .. w LL L O w OV' F+I lZ Q C X Z O w O m Q (0C d LL C� H 0 w w aJoz� a W pave Qn Z icaw 2 m< Oz arc moxwzo .� a U ozz Z 9�0 vwa m 71 s w O w ¢ 0 z O SIM v Qi H Z= � v 2 i 0 III mJ 0 W �o L o 0 o o II ¢ } m o C)w N F- S U `— r a w Q e} U z p C N L) U 0� w= W w 1.0 Q O ¢ W a O A � �A O� AI O � a W wO � V1 O O N N w o C� C� Tuesday, October 01, 2013 2:34:39 PM Utility Owner Duke Energy No. 33+40 (Y1) Description Utility Pole Height ft. ❑Duke Energy Attachment [:]Duke Energy ft. O Time Warner—ft. El AT&T Heights ❑AT&T ft. ❑Other _ ft. ft. ❑ Other ❑ CDOT ft. ❑ Other _ ft. Cross Arms ❑ No ❑ Yes Proposed Grade ft. CUT Propposed Urade ft. CUT ft. FILL ADJUST DURING CONST. Remarks Adiust Ex. Pole Anchor ❑ N o ❑ Yes Utility Owner Duke Energy No. 33+04 (Y1) Description Utility Pole Height ft. ❑Duke Energy Attachment ❑Duke Energy ft. ❑Time Warner—ft. El AT&T Heights ❑ AT&T ft. ❑ Other _ ft. ft. ❑ Other ❑ CDOT ft. ❑ Other _ ft. Cross Arms ❑ No ❑ Yes Proposed Grade ft. CUT Proposed tirade ft. CUT 2.91 ft. FILL ADJUST DURING CONST. Remarks Prop. Duke Pole and Anchor ❑ N o ❑ Yes O - i NO 1 029-411-01 REECE EARL UNTZ ' 33+86 Y1) \ ` AND LINDA F. UNTZ Utility Owner Duke Energy No. DB 2585 PG 286 Description Utility Pole Height ft.--:: 4902 RIDGE RD o ow Attachment ❑Duke Energy ft. ❑Time Warner—it. Heights ❑ AT&T ft. ❑ Other _ ft. g¢ ❑ CDOT ft. ❑Other _ f . \ e e Cross Arms ❑ No ❑ Yes e �� Proposed e `` Grade ft. CUT ft. FILL Remarks Ex. Pole and Anchors to be Removed o o /J ® � F \ / / / U / X\ O �— 0 e \ F F F e F � e F . .................... 'S SS SS SS 8„ PVC SS SS� s SS SS UT E- — UT UT UT UT T UT UT OU 32 00 W W W UT _— UT - OE OE 029-311-38 CHARTER PROPERTIES INC DB 23185 PG 651 4925 RIDGE RD OE W W W / W �O 0 SS SS SS 1 I "u- 0 UT UT UT UT 0i�-//� 0 OE OE e ye SS T W —� 16" WATER I W MAIN W W� W BI L T LANE UT UT U ~ _ CRfP L5' - - SIDEWALK OE OE x x / x FENCE x II E U TE — \ OE RO OE OE OE SSS T _A'S o c�r*t -� UT Utility Owner AT&T No. STA. VARIES Description EX. UT Height ft. Attachment ❑Duke Energy ft. ❑Time Warner—ft. ft. ❑Time Warner—ft. Heights El AT&T ft. ❑Other _ ft. ft. ❑ CDOT ft. ❑ Other _ ft. Cross Arms ❑No ❑Yes ft. ❑ Other _ Proposed Grade ft. CUT ft. FILL ❑ CDOT Remarks ADJUST DURING CONST. AS NEEDED - E / Utility Owner Duke Energy Ex. Utility Pole No. 34+47 (Y1) ft. Description Utility Pole Remarks Height ft. ft. ❑Time Warner—ft. Attachment ❑Duke Energy ft. ❑Time Warner—ft. ft. Heights ❑ AT&T ft. ❑ Other _ ft. ❑ CDOT ft. ❑ Other _ ft. Cross Arms ❑ N o ❑ Yes N N N co � N C N IA Pro�oasdede 1.5, ft. CUT ft. FILL R Z w y Remarks Prop. Duke Pole & Anchor to '° U a LL �0 (To Placed On Ex. Ground) W 0.0 Q0.- w 0 a to F _jadW v� Z -0 woo <Zcd uiO Uuiz QI U OUzi Z }aa m M X. SD EASEMENT z 0 r �n E OE O 029-411-02 CAROLINA STYLE PROPERTIES LLC DB 18489 PG 553 4758 RIDGE RD DECORATIVE TREE f' UTE UTE UTE 11 UTE UTE UTE OE OE OE OE OE OE U _t_'rT o r� __7i __7 _>�s-7777777=7/T/TETT /T/�l�T/T/TT /TETT—T��TTlT SS 0 r_� � G 00� � G � 36 00 � V � G X37 00 0 GW W W W W W W W VV VV o VV VV VV RT UT IF o F in - - �—EX. RCP 18" — — — — — ten-- --FkisTDI SUE tUE < I 02931510 F F F F F \ I I IT DERYL R LEAMING AND LILA M LEAMING w DB 16927 PG 215 e e e e 5305 WAVERLY LYNN LN J w Z G'NGIE 029 313-0 TRAYLO \ I I 6B 147-4 PC 3 4 53 WAV RLY LY N LN Utility Owner Duke Energy No. 34+29 (Y1) Cross Arms ❑ No O Yes Description Ex. Utility Pole Height ft. Remarks Attachment ❑Duke Energy ft. ❑Time Warner—ft. Heights OAT&T ft. ❑ Other _ ft. ❑ CDOT ft. ❑ Other _ ft. Cross Arms ❑ No O Yes ."Or ` ' l Monday, September 30, 2013 2:23:22 PM Prosedsed tir ft. CUT 2' ft. FILL Remarks Prop. Guy Wire to be Installed with New OE Line ."Or ` ' l Monday, September 30, 2013 2:23:22 PM W O N N N co � N C N IA t O` OM U 0sc M t0 f M � - W o v W2 R Z w y C o Z c x a to '° U a LL �0 C� W 0.0 Q0.- w 0 a to F _jadW v� Z -0 woo <Zcd uiO Uuiz QI U OUzi Z }aa m O c�wa z 0 a L) 9) w n m w F- C� 0 z >M O li v aC' Z i L. W� O O D N ¢ II �' _j Q o N Ew- Q 4 x F a w .a ri Q U 0 of z 0 V W 0. _ 3 Nper. LOA 8 a a0. Q PLO W H M w O O C) ."Or ` ' l Monday, September 30, 2013 2:23:22 PM 796 792 788 784 780 796 792 788 784 780 800 796 792 788 784 800 796 792 788 784 11+50 -(1 1)- 11+25 —(I 1)- W O 00 'Z o 0) Uso N N N coN i f0 C N � N IA � 00 2% M t0 F M {1 �� W o .. LL s Wa=� Z v 2 Z N eEO X a LL 2 0 O 0 2% W 064 �woz F ad 2 o Z - - ,2 nn7- O 2% 0 c�wa z 0 a u w —F— I 50 —40 —30 —20 —10 0 10 20 30 40 5 20 50 —40 —30 —20 —10 50 —40 —30 —20 —10 0 10 0 10 20 30 40 5 11+25 —(I 1)- 11+00 -(I l)- 2r. ) - W O 00 °' N N N coN i f0 C N � N IA cfl a' 2% M t0 F M {1 �� W o .. LL s Wa=� Z v 2 Z N eEO X a LL 2 0 O 0 2% W 064 �woz F ad 2 o Z - - ,2 nn7- O 2% 0 c�wa z 0 a u w 50 —40 —30 —20 —10 0 10 20 30 40 5 20 50 —40 —30 —20 —10 m 0 10 20 30 40 5 11+00 -(I l)- 2r. ) - 10+75 —(I 1)— W O N N N coN i f0 C N � N IA CD t o U M t0 F M {1 �� W o .. LL s Wa=� Z v 2 Z N eEO X a LL 2 0 O 0 2% W 064 �woz F ad 2 o Z - - ,2 nn7- O 2% 0 c�wa z 0 a u w 50 —40 —30 —20 —10 0 10 20 30 40 5 10+75 —(I 1)— -50 800 796 792 788 784 -40 -30 -20 -10 10 20 30 40 796 792 788 784 a80 796 792 788 784 a80 800 796 792 788 a84 800 796 792 788 5x84 W O N N N coN i f0 C N � N IA CD t o U M t0 F M {1 �� W o .. LL s Wa=� Z v 2 Z N eEO X a LL 2 0 O 0 2% W 064 �woz F ad 4n C Z O �az as �o Ag x— UujU — u OZZ - 0 } 0 c�wa z 0 a u w D 50 -40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30 40 5 m -50 800 796 792 788 784 -40 -30 -20 -10 10 20 30 40 796 792 788 784 a80 796 792 788 784 a80 800 796 792 788 a84 800 796 792 788 5x84 800 796 792 788 Cf -784 W O N N N coN i f0 C N � N IA CD t o U M t0 F M {1 �� W o .. LL s Wa=� Z v 2 Z 3 rn w .d 'oo ° X a LL 2 0 rn 2% W 064 �woz F ad 4n C Z O �az as �o Ag x— UujU p" u OZZ - 0 } m 0 c�wa z 0 a u w D 50 -40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30 40 5 800 796 792 788 Cf -784 000" N Friday, September 27, 2013 9:51:51 AM W O N N N coN i f0 C N � N IA t o U M t0 F M {1 �� W o .. LL s Wa=� Z v 2 Z w .d 'oo ° X a LL 2 0 F w� a0 W 064 �woz F ad 4n C Z O �az as �o Ag x— UujU p" u OZZ - 0 } m 0 c�wa z 0 a u w D m w F- 0 0 z O v Q H Z= � v i H W:3 D .� m J W M O CO x a .a n � Z3 U m �w m Z pw m N O cD U a Q. LLI 3 0 J z a. LO 0. W O w O w O � O 000" N Friday, September 27, 2013 9:51:51 AM 792 788 784 780 776 796 792 788 784 780 776 796 792 788 784 780 796 792 788 784 780 796 792 788 784 780 12+75 —(I 1)— 12+50 —(I l) - W O O 00 — N �34 oc N O N co � N C N N 00 — co M M M W LL s o R Z o v W 0 Z 00 r` -9 nn7. X L 2 d LLIL 0 000 2%- �w0 Lu 0 Co -jadw C N — — O`� 1 0 c�wa z 0 a u 0 50 —40 —30 —20 —10 50 —40 —30 —20 —10 0 10 0 10 20 30 40 5 12+50 —(I l) - 12+25 —(I 1)— W O O 00 — N N O N co � N C N 2 ° 00 — co M M M W LL s o R Z o v W 0 Z � cc. X L 2 d LLIL 0 N F a� wCL� �w0 Lu 0 Co -jadw C N — — O`� 1 0 c�wa z 0 a u 0 50 —40 —30 —20 —10 0 10 20 30 40 5 50 —40 —30 —20 —10 w 0 10 20 30 40 5 50 —40 —30 —20 —10 0 10 20 30 40 5 12+25 —(I 1)— 12+00 —(1 1)— W O O 00 — N N O N co � N C N 2 ° 00 — co M M M W LL s o R Z o v W 0 Z � cc. X L 2 d LLIL 0 N F a� wCL� �w0 Lu 0 Co -jadw C co a0 - — — CO pp r` 2% 0 c�wa z 0 a u 0 50 —40 —30 —20 —10 0 10 20 30 40 5 12+00 —(1 1)— 11+75 —(1 1)- W O O 00 — N N O N co � N C N 2 ° 00 — co M M M W LL s o R Z o v W 0 Z rn cc. X L 2 d LLIL 0 O r` F a� wCL� �w0 Lu 0 Co -jadw C ZF —nnT.— p' I 0 c�wa z 0 a u 0 m 50 —40 —30 —20 —10 w 0 10 20 30 40 5 11+75 —(1 1)- —50 —40 —30 —20 —10 C 10 20 30 40 792 788 784 780 J76 796 792 788 784 780 J76 796 792 788 784 J80 796 792 788 784 J80 796 792 788 784 5x80 W O O 00 — N N O N co � N C N 2 ° 00 — co M M M W LL s o R Z o v W 0 Z w .CD d to ° X L 2 d LLIL 0 F a� wCL� �w0 Lu 0 Co -jadw C ZF O ¢zad � x— UujU p' u 0 }tea 09 0 c�wa z 0 —50 —40 —30 —20 —10 C 10 20 30 40 792 788 784 780 J76 796 792 788 784 780 J76 796 792 788 784 J80 796 792 788 784 J80 796 792 788 784 5x80 Ole N 1 ..00017 Friday, September 27, 2013 9:53:40 AM W O N O N co � N C N o U co M M M W LL s o R Z o v W 0 Z w .CD d to ° X L 2 d LLIL 0 F a� wCL� �w0 Lu 0 Co -jadw C ZF O ¢zad � x— UujU p' u 0 }tea 09 0 c�wa z 0 a u 0 m w 0 0 z O />/sm 1�■ v a' H Z L H W� D _'o m -J CO L) x a w .a Q U � 0 II Z 3 U m �w m Z pw om ND is (.D3 V 0. J LO a Q rW AO � WO W� V1 V1 0 1 Ole N 1 ..00017 Friday, September 27, 2013 9:53:40 AM 780 776 772 768 764 780 776 772 768 764 780 776 772 768 764 780 776 772 768 764 780 776 772 768 18+00 —(Ll) - 17+50 —(I i)- 2% Ld Lq )— W 0 Lr (.0 % i — -� -9 nnox cD I 2% N O N co � N i f0 C N N IA i � � O M M LL s o Z o v � cw7 Z w .d 'O° ° d X LL CL �0 w� 0.0 64 w0: w ~ay F � ots W TA Z 0 <Zcd � x— UujO QI 294, LL U OZZ } 'M 3a m O c�wa z 0 50 —40 —30 —20 —10 0 10 20 30 40 50 6 a u w 50 -40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30 40 50 6 m 50 -40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30 40 50 6 17+50 —(I i)- 2% Ld Lq )— W r`tr N Lr (.0 % i — -� -9 nnox 2% N O N co � N i f0 C N N IA i � � O M M LL s o Z o v � cw7 Z w .d 'O° ° d X LL CL �0 w� 0.0 64 w0: w ~ay F � ots W TA Z 0 <Zcd � x— UujO QI 294, LL U OZZ } 'M 3a m O c�wa z 0 50 —40 —30 —20 —10 0 10 20 30 40 50 6 a u w 50 -40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30 40 50 6 17+50 —(I i)- 2% Ld Lq )— 17+25 —(I 1)— W N � O Lq % i -nn7.-nn7.r` N O N co � N i f0 C N N IA i � � O M M LL s o Z o v � cw7 Z w .d 'O° ° d X LL CL �0 w� 0.0 64 w0: w ~ay F � ots W TA Z 0 <Zcd � x— UujO QI 294, LL U OZZ } 'M 3a m O c�wa z 0 50 —40 —30 —20 —10 0 10 20 30 40 50 6 a u w 50 -40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30 40 50 6 17+25 —(I 1)— 780 776 772 768 364 780 776 772 768 364 780 776 772 768 364 780 776 772 768 364 780 776 772 368 W N � O O LCj % N O N co � N i f0 C N N IA � � O M M LL s o Z o v � cw7 Z w .d 'O° ° d X LL CL �0 w� 0.0 64 w0: w ~ay F � ots W TA Z 0 <Zcd � x— UujO QI 294, LL U OZZ } 'M 3a m O c�wa z 0 50 —40 —30 —20 —10 0 10 20 30 40 50 6 a u w D m 50 -40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30 40 50 6 780 776 772 768 364 780 776 772 768 364 780 776 772 768 364 780 776 772 768 364 780 776 772 368 W O % N O N co � N i f0 C N N IA � � O M M LL s o Z o v � cw7 Z w .d 'O° ° d X LL CL �0 w� 0.0 64 w0: w ~ay F � ots W TA Z 0 <Zcd � x— UujO QI 294, LL U OZZ } 'M 3a m O c�wa z 0 50 —40 —30 —20 —10 0 10 20 30 40 50 6 780 776 772 768 364 780 776 772 768 364 780 776 772 768 364 780 776 772 768 364 780 776 772 368 Moor I%ft Monday, September 30, 2013 1:40:41 PM W O N O N co � N i f0 C N N IA � � O M M LL s o Z o v � cw7 Z w .d 'O° ° d X LL CL �0 w� 0.0 64 w0: w ~ay F � ots W TA Z 0 <Zcd � x— UujO QI 294, LL U OZZ } 'M 3a m O c�wa z 0 a u w D m w F- 0 0 z li v a= W Zo � v y LL. W� �o z° _Lo L'i m Q o w < U CO x F- a w .a Q U z v z NO� 13 c- U a a 3 C J Q� LO 0. W AO O o w O O con M O 0 1 Moor I%ft Monday, September 30, 2013 1:40:41 PM 784 780 776 772 784 780 776 772 768 32+50 —(Y1 i— -50 -40 -30 -20 -10 0 32+25 -(Y11- 10 20 30 40 50 784 780 776 772 68 7a w O Ln � � rnvi r` to G r- cfl r7 N rn N O 00 N O r` nIC!00 LL s o Z o W v c7 Z Ln N 00 00 CL r` r- r` — r- _ rl Ln r` r` _ — woo <Zcd x— USO r r` r` U OZZ }3a 0 c�wa -2007, P. o C a -_ u w D m w F - 70 -60 -50 -40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 7 0 z -50 -40 -30 -20 -10 0 32+25 -(Y11- 10 20 30 40 50 784 780 776 772 68 7a 800 796 792 788 788 784 780 776 772 32+00 w O Ln � � rnvi r` to G r- O O M N rn N t C U LO nIC!00 LL s o Z o W v c7 Z 00 00 CL r` O r` 0) � Ln r` r` _ r -— woo <Zcd x— USO QI U OZZ }3a 0 c�wa -2007, P. o C a -_ u w D m w F - 70 -60 -50 -40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 7 800 796 792 788 788 784 780 776 772 32+00 -50 -40 788 784 780 776 -30 -20 -10 0 31+50 10 20 30 40 50 784 780 776 a72 788 784 780 776 72 7a 788 w O Ln � � rnvi G O rn N O O M N rn N t C U LO LL s o Z o W v c7 Z 00 9.. Qn7- CL r` O r` 0) � � a; r` woo <Zcd x— USO QI U OZZ }3a 0 c�wa -2007, P. o C a -_ u w D m w F - Q 0 z -50 -40 788 784 780 776 -30 -20 -10 0 31+50 10 20 30 40 50 784 780 776 a72 788 784 780 776 72 7a 788 w O Ln � � rnvi G O rn N O O M N rn N t C U M t0 F M M M W 9 LL s o Z o W v c7 Z 00 9.. Qn7- CL r` - 1 91 r- O K) M � 00 00 o woo <Zcd x— USO QI U OZZ }3a 0 c�wa z O P. o C a -_ u w D m w F - 788 784 780 -40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 7476 31+00 792 - Y1 - 788 784 780 776 -40 -30 -20 -10 0 30+50 -(Y1)- 10 20 30 40 50 60 w O Ln � � rnvi N N N co � N i f0 C N N In t C U M t0 F M M M W 9 LL s o Z o W v c7 Z W .d 'o° ° C X a CL w� a� O K) M � 00 00 o woo <Zcd x— USO QI U OZZ }3a 0 c�wa z O O r- o C a -_ u w D m w F - Q -40 -30 -20 -10 0 30+50 -(Y1)- 10 20 30 40 50 60 -60 -50 -40 -30 -20 -10 10 20 30 40 50 800 796 792 788 792 788 784 780 76 7a w O N N N co � N i f0 C N N In t C U M t0 F M M M W 9 LL s o Z o W v c7 Z W .d 'o° ° C X a CL w� a� O K) M � 00 00 o woo <Zcd x— USO QI U OZZ }3a 0 c�wa z O O r- o C a -_ u w D m w F - Q 0 z -60 -50 -40 -30 -20 -10 10 20 30 40 50 800 796 792 788 792 788 784 780 76 7a Monday, September 30, 2013 1:37:10 PM w O N N N co � N i f0 C N N In t C U M t0 F M M M W 9 LL s o Z o W v c7 Z W .d 'o° ° C X a CL w� a� ,azo o W F �adv� � Z woo <Zcd x— USO QI U OZZ }3a 0 c�wa z O a u w D m w F - Q 0 z >M o I= v Q H Zo V i H W� a Z Y■ O D _LO m Q o w 00 x a w Q � OI z 3 U m �w m Z pw o mcD N D V w 0. 3 J I� O 1 f4 w0 HM O 1 Monday, September 30, 2013 1:37:10 PM 780 776 772 768 764 780 776 772 768 764 760 31Y1+10 - 780 776 772 768 764 760 34+00 780 776 772 768 764 60 -40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30 40 50 33+50 780 -( 1)- 776 772 768 764 W loci 0 N N N coN i f0 C N � N IA M � 04 M t0 F M M aW M o a WU' Z W w to ° X L 2 a LLIL 0 cl CL r` - 6 i. CN r- �wo(D w ~ °- wo TA Z 2% QI PROP. INTERSECTION SEE SHEET 9 rn o — m n o -— 0 a _ i — o % D m w F- 0 0 z O v Q H Zo i 50 —40 —30 —20 —10 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 780 776 772 768 764 760 34+00 780 776 772 768 764 60 -40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30 40 50 33+50 780 -( 1)- 776 772 768 764 — 40 -30 —20 —10 0 33+00 -(Y1)- 10 20 30 40 780 776 772 768 5464 W loci 0 N N N coN i f0 C N � N IA M � 04 M t0 F M M aW M o a WU' Z W w to ° X L 2 a LLIL 0 cl CL r` - 6 i. CN r- �wo(D w ~ °- wo TA Z 2% QI r- � X LL U OZZ 99 }(Da — m O c�wa z 0 -— a i u w D m — 40 -30 —20 —10 0 33+00 -(Y1)- 10 20 30 40 780 776 772 768 5464 —70 .e IW —30 —20 —10 u 10 20 30 40 780 776 772 768 5464 W loci 0 N N N coN i f0 C N � N IA 0 t C U M t0 F M M aW LL s o R Z o a WU' Z W w to ° X L 2 a LLIL 0 cl CL U F W 0. (D 6 i. LO �wo(D w ~ °- wo TA Z 2% QI r- � X LL U OZZ 99 }(Da — m O c�wa z 0 -— a i u w D m w F- 0 0 z O v —70 .e IW —30 —20 —10 u 10 20 30 40 780 776 772 768 5464 .0001V N% Monday, September 30, 2013 11:50:11 AM W loci 0 N N N coN i f0 C N � N IA 0 t C U M t0 F M M aW LL s o R Z o a WU' Z W w to ° X L 2 a LLIL 0 cl CL U F W 0. (D 6 i. �wo(D w ~ °- wo TA Z f- wi0a <Z06 � x- uiO Uuiz QI X LL U OZZ 99 }(Da m O c�wa z 0 a u w D m w F- 0 0 z O v Q H Zo i H W:) Z Y■ O D �in,R m a O o w Uco x C� x F a .a n O z Q Q O m O V cD V x 0. = 3 J C N L0 Q ¢ rW O � O �M CIVA) w0 NM � a .0001V N% Monday, September 30, 2013 11:50:11 AM 784 780 776 772 768 764 36+50 —(Y1)— 784 780 776 772 768 64 -50 -40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 36+00 784 -( Y1 - 780 776 772 768 76 rn W O N N N co � N i f0 C N N IA t C M t0 F M M W �• LL s o R Z o v W 0 w y to � • CL N0 P 6 Li LO TIE IN TO EX. GROUND AT O N QI r` X LL U OZZ gm }aa - M r7 - 4. 4:1 AS SHOWN N O00 - 6. LYNN LN AT 60 AS SHOWN r` r`1 nnox-- N N _ - -_ - — r` r` m w a 0 0 z > O 1�■ v Q H 784 780 776 772 768 64 -50 -40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 36+00 784 -( Y1 - 780 776 772 768 76 rn 450 784 780 776 772 768 764 -40 -30 -20 -10 0 35+50 -(Y1)- 10 20 30 40 50 784 780 776 772 768 6x64 W O N N N co � N i f0 C N N IA t C M t0 F M M W �• LL s o R Z o v W 0 w y to X Z CL LL CL �' w� 0.0 6 N O V� Z O N QI N X LL U OZZ gm }aa M r7 z O Lq TIE IN TO EX. WAVERLY N O00 - 6. LYNN LN AT 60 AS SHOWN r` r`1 nnox-- N N _ - -_ - — r` r` m w a 0 0 z > O 1�■ v Q H 450 784 780 776 772 768 764 -40 -30 -20 -10 0 35+50 -(Y1)- 10 20 30 40 50 784 780 776 772 768 6x64 784 780 776 772 768 -50 -40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 8464 35+00 780 -( 1)- 776 772 768 764 760 W O N N N co � N i f0 C N N IA t C M t0 F M M W �• LL s o R Z o v W 0 w y to X Z CL LL CL �' w� 0.0 6 N O V� Z O N QI p X LL U OZZ gm }aa m O ca z O N O00 - r4 u w r`1 nnox-- N N _ - -_ - — r` r` m w a 0 0 z > O 1�■ v Q H z � v 784 780 776 772 768 -50 -40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 8464 35+00 780 -( 1)- 776 772 768 764 760 780 776 772 768 764 J60 W O N N N co � N i f0 C N N IA t C M t0 F M M W �• LL s o R Z o v W 0 w y to X Z CL LL CL �' w� 0.0 6 N O V� Z O N QI p X LL U OZZ gm }aa m O ca z O a - r4 u w 0 m w a 0 0 z > O 1�■ v Q H z � v i H 50 —40 —30 —20 —10 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 8 780 776 772 768 764 J60 .0001V N Monday, September 30, 2013 11:43:51 AM W O N N N co � N i f0 C N N IA t C M t0 F M M W �• LL s o R Z o v W 0 w y to X Z CL LL CL �' w� 0.0 6 ��LD 64 w ~ay F ad w V� Z 0 woo aZcd � x— ujO Uujz QI X LL U OZZ gm }aa m O ca z O a r4 u w 0 m w a 0 0 z > O 1�■ v Q H z � v i H W:) zo 0■ o 0 LO oa J Q 0 w 00 z a. 0 a u 0 0 o z o L _ L'i N V as 3 rW O � O w0 NM O .0001V N Monday, September 30, 2013 11:43:51 AM 792 788 784 780 776 772 38+50 —(Y1)— 792 788 784 780 776 —50 —40 —30 —20 —10 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 72 38+00 792 _( Y1 — 788 784 780 776 W O N O N co � N i f0 C N N IA 0 t CM U O M t0 F M W •• 0 s o m z o v�� 2 " o W Z wd . o° '° X LL a IL O= w� 0.0 6 064 Wzo w ~°-in F _jadw V� Z 0 BOG Azad � x— ujO Uujz QI �0 X LL U OZZ 99 }tea 00 O c�wa � `) O N CD Oc � — O r` — O 00 00 D r- m w F- 0 0 z O v 792 788 784 780 776 —50 —40 —30 —20 —10 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 72 38+00 792 _( Y1 — 788 784 780 776 792 788 784 780 776 7 72 —50 -40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 37+50 792 _( Y1 - 788 784 780 776 772 W O N O N co � N i f0 C N N IA 0 t CM U O M t0 F M W •• 0 s o m z o v�� 2 " o W Z wd . o° '° X LL a IL O= w� 0.0 6 064 Wzo w ~°-in F _jadw V� Z 0 BOG Azad � x— ujO Uujz QI X LL U OZZ 99 }tea 00 O c�wa co O� c0 p oPA rn � — 0) 1 00 D r- m w F- 0 0 z O v Q H 792 788 784 780 776 7 72 —50 -40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 37+50 792 _( Y1 - 788 784 780 776 772 792 788 784 780 776 -50 -40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 72 37+00 788 _( Y1 - 784 780 776 772 768 W O N O N co � N i f0 C N N IA 0 t CM U O M t0 F M W •• 0 s o m z o v�� 2 " o W Z wd . o° '° X LL a IL O= w� 0.0 6 064 Wzo w ~°-in F _jadw V� Z 0 BOG Azad � x— ujO Uujz QI X LL U OZZ 99 }tea O O c�wa co O� c0 p a 0 00 00 00 — L 1 00 D r- m w F- 0 0 z O v Q H 792 788 784 780 776 -50 -40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 72 37+00 788 _( Y1 - 784 780 776 772 768 788 784 780 776 772 a68 W O N O N co � N i f0 C N N IA 0 t CM U O M t0 F M W •• 0 s o m z o v�� 2 " o W Z wd . o° '° X LL a IL O= w� 0.0 6 064 Wzo w ~°-in F _jadw V� Z 0 BOG Azad � x— ujO Uujz QI X LL U OZZ 99 }tea O O c�wa co O� c0 p a r — r — 1 D m w F- 0 0 z O v Q H 50 —40 —30 —20 —10 0 10 90 30 40 50 6 788 784 780 776 772 a68 .00000" N I _ff Monday, September 30, 2013 11:32:20 AM W O N O N co � N i f0 C N N IA 0 t CM U O M t0 F M W •• 0 s o m z o v�� 2 " o W Z wd . o° '° X LL a IL O= w� 0.0 6 064 Wzo w ~°-in F _jadw V� Z 0 BOG Azad � x— ujO Uujz QI X LL U OZZ 99 }tea O c�wa z 0 a r4 u w D m w F- 0 0 z O v Q H Zo V i H W:) zo 0■ o 0 LO L'_j u m u C� _ w00 x a w w Q 0 o z D 0 V 0. _ Ll 3 N LO a Q Q rW O � O �M CIVA) w0 NM �con � a O 1 .00000" N I _ff Monday, September 30, 2013 11:32:20 AM 796 792 788 784 780 776 40+ 50 —(Yl)— 796 792 788 784 780 -50 -40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30 40 50 6d76 40+00 796 - - 792 788 784 780 776 W O N O N co � N C N IA t C U O N00 N N 00 00 r,- i / o v W2 0 Z �p X a LL 2 0 CL F w� 0.0 6 64 I- ��ado Azad � x - UuiO — X LL U OZZ LC O c=wa z 0 O r7 Oc Lq 00 Iq 00 co _ rl — co I- _ r` 3• w F- 0 O z O v Q H 796 792 788 784 780 -50 -40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30 40 50 6d76 40+00 796 - - 792 788 784 780 776 796 792 788 784 780 -50 -40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30 40 50 6d76 39+50 792 -( 1)- 788 784 780 776 772 W O N O N co � N C N IA t C U O N00 N N 00 00 r,- i / o v W2 0 Z �p X a LL 2 0 CL F w� 0.0 6 64 I- ��ado Azad � x - UuiO — X LL U OZZ O c=wa z 0 O O O N � co _ rl — co I- _ r` 3• w F- 0 O z O v Q H 796 792 788 784 780 -50 -40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30 40 50 6d76 39+50 792 -( 1)- 788 784 780 776 772 792 788 784 780 776 -50 -40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30 40 50 6d72 39+00 792 788 784 780 776 -50 -40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30 40 50 792 788 784 780 776 6d72 W O N O N co � N C N IA t C U O N00 N N 00 00 r,- i / o v W2 0 Z �p X a LL 2 0 CL F w� 0.0 6 64 I- ��ado Azad � x - UuiO — X LL U OZZ O c=wa z 0 a r4 u w D m w F- 0 792 788 784 780 776 -50 -40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30 40 50 6d72 39+00 792 788 784 780 776 -50 -40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30 40 50 792 788 784 780 776 6d72 .0001V N% Monday, September 30, 2013 11:24:35 AM W O N O N co � N C N IA t C U M t0 F M M �� W LL s o R Z o v W2 0 Z w .d 'o° ° X a LL 2 0 CL F w� 0.0 6 64 �0L3 w ~ay W F �adZ o ��ado Azad � x - UuiO QI X LL U OZZ O c=wa z 0 a r4 u w D m w F- 0 O z O v Q H Z � v i H W� zo 0■ o 0 sLO C] O w C� w CO x a w n O i z o � D 4 U� c� V � 0. _ Ll 3 � J N rW O � O � a .0001V N% Monday, September 30, 2013 11:24:35 AM 792 788 784 780 776 72 42+50 —(Y11— 792 788 784 780 776 7 —50 —40 —30 —20 —10 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 72 42+00 792 —( Y1 — 788 784 780 776 772 W O N O N co � N C N IA t 0 M t0 F M {1 W LL s o R Z o v W WU' Z W .d o° '° X LL d IL 0 C� 00 00 0 W 064 6W w�0 Lu ~0. (q F 0 ots v� Z . WOG Azad � x— UujO QI 2% EX. D W Ln O) N 00 00 _ 00 p _ r` r`— ffm 00 00 _ N 3� 0 m w F- 0 O z > O 1�■ v Q H 792 788 784 780 776 7 —50 —40 —30 —20 —10 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 72 42+00 792 —( Y1 — 788 784 780 776 772 792 788 784 780 776 72 —50 —40 —30 —20 —10 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 41+50 796 —( Y1 — 792 788 784 780 76 W O N O N co � N C N IA t 0 M t0 F M {1 W LL s o R Z o v W WU' Z W .d o° '° X LL d IL 0 C� 00 00 0 W 064 6W w�0 Lu ~0. (q F 0 ots v� Z . WOG Azad � x— UujO QI 2% EX. D W 00 00 r` r` 0000 r` _ 00 N 00 r` _ 00 00 00 00 N LO 0 m w F- 0 O z 792 788 784 780 776 72 —50 —40 —30 —20 —10 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 41+50 796 —( Y1 — 792 788 784 780 76 796 792 788 784 780 7 —50 —40 —30 —20 —10 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 76 41+00 796 —( Y1 — 792 788 784 780 776 W O N O N co � N C N IA t 0 M t0 F M {1 W LL s o R Z o v W WU' Z W .d o° '° X LL d IL 0 C� U F W a� W 064 6W w�0 Lu ~0. (q F 0 ots v� Z . WOG Azad � x— UujO QI TIE INT EX. D W O c�wa 00 _ 00 00 00 00 N LO 0 m w F- 0 O z > O 1�■ v 796 792 788 784 780 7 —50 —40 —30 —20 —10 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 76 41+00 796 —( Y1 — 792 788 784 780 776 —50 —40 —30 —20 —10 L We 20 30 40 50 796 792 788 784 780 6476 W O N O N co � N C N IA t 0 M t0 F M {1 W LL s o R Z o v W WU' Z W .d o° '° X LL d IL 0 C� U F W a� W 064 6W w�0 Lu ~0. (q F 0 ots v� Z . WOG Azad � x— UujO QI LL U OZZ � }tea O c�wa 00 P6 00 Oc 00 000o 0 00 ao / 0 m w F- 0 O z —50 —40 —30 —20 —10 L We 20 30 40 50 796 792 788 784 780 6476 .0001V N Monday, September 30, 2013 11:09:35 AM W O N O N co � N C N IA t 0 M t0 F M {1 W LL s o R Z o v W WU' Z W .d o° '° X LL d IL 0 C� U F W a� W 064 6W w�0 Lu ~0. (q F 0 ots v� Z . WOG Azad � x— UujO QI LL U OZZ � }tea O c�wa z 0 a w 0 m w F- 0 O z > O 1�■ v Q H Z � v i H W:) Z Y■ O D In w � J Q LUQ w x 00 x F a w w Q O o z O 0 V 0. _ L'i 3 N LOAt LLI a ¢ A rW 0 � O Fil 4w) � O .0001V N Monday, September 30, 2013 11:09:35 AM 788 784 780 776 772 768 43+50 -(Y1)- 788 784 780 776 772 —50 —40 —30 —20 —10 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 68 43+00 792 — — 788 784 780 776 772 W O N O N co � N C N IA U C M M Z M 0so R Z W2 o ;.;F w7 c Z w .d o° '° X LL a IL 0 CL rn w 6w 064 0: (D ~°-F, F 0adw v� C Z �0o O ¢z as a x— Uujz ujz p" u Ozz � }tea 0 c�wa U. z _O F- a Oi ofOi r` r` 00 8:1 •1 D _ � 1 m w F- 0 O z O v --------------- 788 784 780 776 772 —50 —40 —30 —20 —10 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 68 43+00 792 — — 788 784 780 776 772 -50 —40 —30 —20 MH U 10 W NEI at 50 792 788 784 780 776 6x72 W O N O N co � N C N IA U C M M Z M 0so R Z W2 o ;.;F w7 c Z w .d o° '° X LL a IL 0 CL F w� 0.0 w 6w 064 0: (D ~°-F, F 0adw v� C Z �0o O ¢z as a x— Uujz ujz p" u Ozz � }tea 0 c�wa U. z _O F- a Oi ofOi r` r` 00 u w D _ � 1 m w F- 0 O z O v --------------- -50 —40 —30 —20 MH U 10 W NEI at 50 792 788 784 780 776 6x72 ..O*P' � I Monday, September 30, 2013 10:18:15 AM W O N O N co � N C N IA U C M M Z M 0so R Z W2 o ;.;F w7 c Z w .d o° '° X LL a IL 0 CL F w� 0.0 w 6w 064 0: (D ~°-F, F 0adw v� C Z �0o O ¢z as a x— Uujz ujz p" u Ozz � }tea 0 c�wa U. z _O F- a u w D m w F- 0 O z O v Q H Z � V i H W� Z Y■ O D Ln r jg m Q O U00 o w C� x x F a w w Q O o z O V 0. _ 3 N �@• � a AAt rW 0 � O O O ..O*P' � I Monday, September 30, 2013 10:18:15 AM