SW8950317_HISTORICAL FILE_20120405

STORMWATER DIVISION CODING SHEET
POST -CONSTRUCTION PERMITS
PERMIT NO.
SW8 q5 03 �1
DOC TYPE
❑ CURRENT PERMIT
❑ APPROVED PLANS
® HISTORICAL FILE
❑ COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION
DOC DATE
2012oyv5
YYYYMMDD

r�
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Beverly Eaves Perdue Charles Wakild, P. E.
Governor Director
April 5, 2012
Mr. Daniel T. Waller, Sr. Vice President
Onslow Memorial Hospital
241 New River Drive
Jacksonville, NC 28540
Subject: Stormwater Permit No. SW8 950317 Modification 2
Parking - ER & Surgical Services Pavilion - Onslow Memorial Hospital
High Density Project
Onslow County
Dear Mr. Waller:
Dee Freeman
Secretary
The Wilmington Regional Office received a complete Stormwater Management Permit
Application for ER & Surgical Services Pavilion on March 19, 2012. This permit modifies permit
SW8 950317, issued on August 3, 2006, by revising the permit to increase the built -upon area
(BUA) in the high density pocket of an overall 30% low density development; and by reducing
the BUA in the low density section. Staff review of the plans and specifications has determined
that the project, as proposed, will comply with the Stormwater Regulations set forth in Title 15A
NCAC 2H.1000. Therefore, we are forwarding Permit No. SW8 950317 Modification 2 dated
April 5, 2012, for the construction, operation, and maintenance of the subject parking project.
However, this permit represents a temporary approval pending a modification to expand the wet
detention pond In the high density pocket (drainage area DA1) to handle the actual BUA (pre-88
+ newer) plus any future expansion. Presently, for the pocket of high density, the pond is .
designed to handle runoff from 176,410 square feet of BUA. For the future modification the
pond will need to be designed to handle 295,594 (pre-1988 + newer) square feet of BUA
plusany future BUA expansion. Please reference the "BUA Summary' table in the permit for a
summary of the BUA and project area. In order to validate this permit approval, and remain in
compliance with this permit modification, the permittee must submit a new permit modification
with revised plans showing future development to DWQ within 18 months, as stated in the
attached letter dated April 4, 2012 from David Newsom to DWQ. This means that, unless
otherwise notified by the permittee of a new development schedule, a new permit modification
must be received by DWQ by October 5, 2013, otherwise the permittee may be subject to
enforcement action by the Division of Water Quality, in accordance with North Carolina General
Statute 143-215.6A to 143-215.6C.
On August 5, 2009, the Governor signed Session Law 2009-406. This law impacts any
development approval Issued by the Division of Water Quality under Article 21 of Chapter 143 of
the General Statutes, which is current and valid at any point between January 1, 2008, and
December 31, 2010. The law extends the effective period of any stormwater permit that is set to
expire during this time frame to three (3) years from its current expiration date. On August 2,
2010, the Governor signed Session Law 2010-177, which grants an extra year for a total of four
(4) years extension.
Wilmington Regional Office
127 Cardinal Drive Extension, Wilmington, North Carolina 28405
Phone: [phone] FAX: [phone] DENR Assistance 1-877-623-6748
Internet w .ncwaterqualiry org

State Stormwater Management Systems
Permit No. SW8 950317 IVIOD 2
Therefore, this permit shall now be effective from the date of issuance until August 3, 2020
(which includes the 4 year extension), and shall be subject to the conditions and limitations as
specified therein. Please pay special attention to the conditions listed in this permit regarding
the Operation and Maintenance of the BMP(s), recordation of deed restrictions, certification of
the BMP's, procedures for changes of ownership, transferring the permit, and renewing the
permit. Failure to establish an adequate system for operation and maintenance of the
stormwater management system, to record deed restrictions, to certify the BMP's, to transfer the
permit, or to renew the permit, will result in future compliance problems.
If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this permit are unacceptable, you have the
right to request an adjudicatory hearing by filing a written petition with the Office of
Administrative Hearings (OAH). The written petition must conform to Chapter 150B of the North
Carolina General Statutes, and must be filed with the OAH within thirty (30) days of receipt of
this permit. You should contact the OAH with all questions regarding the filing fee (if a filing fee
is required) and/or the details of the filing process at 6714 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NIC
27699-6714, or via telephone at 919-431-3000, or visit their website at www.NCOAH.com.
Unless such demands are made this permit shall be final and binding.
If you have any questions, or need additional information concerning this matter, please contact
Steve Pusey at [phone].
Si/cerely,
,- Charles Wakild, P.E., Director
Division of Water Quality
GDS/sgp:
S:\WQS\STORMWATER\Permits & Projects\1995\ 950317 HD\ 2012 03 permit 950317
cc. David Newsom, PE — Crystal Coast Engineering, PA
John Pierce, PLS - John L. Pierce & Associates, PA
Danny Bryan, City of Jacksonville
Wilmington Regional -Offices

State Stormwater Management Systems
Permit No. SW8 950317 MOD 2
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
STATE STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PERMIT
OVERALL LOW DENSITY SUBDIVISION DEVELOPMENT
WITH POCKETS OF HIGH DENSITY
In accordance with the provisions of Article 21 of Chapter 143, General Statutes of
North Carolina as amended, and other applicable Laws, Rules, and Regulations
PERMISSION IS HEREBY GRANTED TO
Daniel T. Waller and Onslow Memorial Hospital
Parking - ER & Surgical Services Pavilion - Onslow Memorial Hospital
317 Western Blvd., Jacksonville, Onslow County
FOR THE
construction, operation and maintenance of an overall 30% low density development
with one (1) State Stormwater wet detention pond and one (1) City of Jacksonville wet
detention pond to treat the higher density areas, in compliance with the provisions of
Title 15A NCAC 2H .1000 (hereafter referred to as the "stormwaterrules') and the
approved stormwater management plans and specifications and other supporting data
as attached and on file with and approved by the Division of Water Quality and
considered a part of this permit.
This permit modifies Permit No. SW8 950317, issued on August 3, 2006, by revising the
permit to increase the built -upon area (BUA) in the high density pocket of an overall
30% low density development; and by reducing the BUA in the low density section.
This permit represents a temporary approval pending a modification in the future to
expand the wet detention pond in the high density pocket (drainage area DA1) to handle
the actual BUA (pre-88 + newer). In this permit, for the pocket of high density, the pond
is designed to handle runoff from 176,410 square feet of BUA. In the future
modification, the pond will need to be designed to handle 295,594 (pre-1988 + newer)
square feet BUA plus future additional BUA. Please reference the 'BUA Summary"
table on the next page for a summary of BUA and project area. In order to validate this
permit approval, and remain in compliance with this permit modification, the permittee
must submit a new permit modification with revised plans showing future development
to DWQ within 18 months, as stated in the attached letter dated April 4, 2012 from
David Newsom to DWQ. This means that, unless otherwise notified by the permittee of
a new development schedule, a new permit modification must be received by DWQ by
October 5, 2013, otherwise the permittee may be subject to enforcement action by the
Division of Water Quality, in accordance with North Carolina General Statute 143-
215.6A to 143-215.6C.
Page 3 of 10

State Stormwater Management Systems
Permit No. SW8 950317 MOD 2
BUA Summary
SW8 950317
22-Mar-12
Onslow Memorial Hospital MOD 2
Total
DA1
HD Pocket 1
(2006 DWQ)
DA2
HD Pocket 2
(HD Jax)
DA3
LD
As -built in March 2012 with proposed improvements: Impervious (Pre-1988+"new")
Bldg
211,135
84,329
9,824
116,982
parking / streets
437,512
182,504
90,195
164,813
Sidewalk
42,557
23,383
2,508
16,666
pre-88 BUA onsite *
Incl. above
Incl. above
Incl. above
incl. above
pre-88 BUA offsite
5,378
5,378
0
0
Future
41,000
0
41,000
0
BUA Total (Pre1988+"new")
737,582
295,594
143,527
298,461
"New" BUA
469,935
277,349
92,303
100,283
Pre1988 BUA
267,647
18,245
51,224
198,178
Project Area (sf)
1,956,725
594,158
172,945
1,189,622
Project Area (acres)
44.92
13.64
3.97
27.31
' Pre-88 BUA onsite is included in buildings, parking, streets, & sidewalk.
This permit shall be effective from the date of issuance until August 3, 2020 and shall be
subject to the following specified conditions and limitations:
I. DESIGN STANDARDS
This permit is effective only with respect to the nature and volume of stormwater
described in the application and other supporting data.
The overall tract built -upon area percentage for the project must be maintained at
30% per the requirements of Section .1005 of the stormwater rules. This
stormwater system for the high density pocket (drainage area DA1) has been
approved for"the management of stormwater runoff as described in Section 1.6 on
page 5 of this permit. The stormwater control has been designed to handle the
runoff from 176,410 square feet of impervious area that will result from the
increase in BUA for the subject project.
3. The runoff from the design built -upon areas within drainage areas of the pockets
of high density must be directed into the permitted stormwater control systems.
4. The stormwater s stems proposed to treat the runoff generated by the
designated high density areas have been approved for the management of
stormwater runoff as described in Section 1.6 on page 5 of this permit and in the
City of Jacksonville permit.
5. The low density portions of this project will maintain a minimum 30 foot wide
vegetated buffer between all impervious areas and surface waters.
sf
sf
sf
sf
sf
sf
sf
sf
sf
ac
Page 4 of 10

State Stormwater Management Systems
Permit No. SW8 950317 MOD 2
6. The following design criteria have been provided in the wet detention pond and
must
be maintained at design condition:
a.
Drainage Area, 9.cres:
13.64
Onsite, ft .
594,158
Offsite, ftz:
None
b.
Increase in Impervious
Surfaces, ftz:
176,410
OS Buildings,
ftz:
69,313
OS Streets/ParkiPg, ftz:
98,864
OS Sidewalks, ft :
8,233
C.
Design Storm, inches:
1.0
d.
Pond Depth, feet:
4.0
e.
TSS removal efficiency:
90%
f.
Permanent Pool Elevation, FMSL:
27.5
g.
Permanent Pool Surface Area, ftz:
21,884
h.
Permitted Storage Volume, ft3:
24,966
i.
Temporary Storage Elevation, FMSL:
32.6
j.
Controlling Orifice:
2.0" 0 pipe
(Marked, approved plans from TO to TO per Engineer, 8/3/2006)
k.
Permitted Forebay Volume, ft3:
10,175
I.
Receiving Stream/River Basin:
Scales Creek / White Oak
M.
Stream Index Number:
19-16-4
n.
Classification of Water Body:
"SC; HQW, NSW"
il. SCHEDULE OF COMPLIANCE
1. No homeowner/lot owner/developer shall fill in, alter, or pipe any drainage feature
(such as swales) shown on the approved plans as part of the stormwater
management system without submitting a revision to the permit and receiving
approval from the Division.
2. The Director may notify the permittee when the permitted site does not meet one
or more of the minimum requirements of the permit. Within the time frame
specified in the notice, the permittee shall submit a written time schedule to the
Director for modifying the site to meet minimum requirements. The permittee
shall provide copies of revised plans and certification in writing to the Director
that the changes have been made.
3. The stormwater management system shall be constructed in its entirety,
vegetated and operational for its intended use prior to the construction of any
built -upon surface. '
4. Within the low density portions of the permitted project, all roof drains shall
terminate at least 30 feet from the mean high water mark of surface waters.
5. The permittee shall submit to the Director and shall have received approval for
revised plans, specifications, and calculations prior to construction, for any
modification to the approved plans, including, but not limited to those listed
below:
a. Any revision to the approved plans, regardless of size.
b. Project name change.
C. Transfer of ownership.
d. Redesign or addition to the approved amount of built -upon area.
Page 5 of 10

State Stormwater Management Systems
Permit No. SW8 950317 MOD 2
e. Further development, subdivision, acquisition, or sale of any, all or part of
the project area. The project area is defined as all property owned by the
permittee, for which Sedimentation and Erosion Control Plan approval or a
CAMA Major permit was sought.
f. Filling in, altering, or piping of any vegetative conveyance shown on the
approved plan.
6. The Director may determine that other revisions to the project should require a
modification to the permit.
7. All stormwater collection and treatment systems must be located in either
dedicated common areas or recorded easements. The final plats for the project
must be recorded showing all such required easements, in accordance with the
approved plans.
8. During construction, erosion shall be kept to a minimum and any eroded areas of
the system will be repaired immediately.
9. Upon completion of construction, prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy,
and prior to operation of this permitted facility, a certification must be received
from an appropriate designer for the system installed certifying that the permitted
facility has been installed in accordance with this permit, the approved plans and
specifications, and other supporting documentation. Any deviations from the
approved plans and specifications must be noted on the Certification.
10. If the stormwater system was used as an Erosion Control device, it must be
restored to design condition prior to operation as a stormwater treatment device,
and prior to occupancy of the facility.
11. Unless otherwise shown, permanent seeding requirements for the stormwater
control must follow the guidelines established in the North Carolina Erosion and
Sediment Control Planning and Design Manual.
12. This permit shall become void unless the facilities are constructed in accordance
with the conditions of this permit, the approved plans and specifications, and
other supporting data.
13. The permittee shall at all times provide the operation and maintenance
necessary to assure that all components of the permitted stormwater system
function at optimum efficiency. The approved Operation and Maintenance Plan
must be followed in its entirety and maintenance must occur at the scheduled
intervals including, but not limited to:
a. Semiannual scheduled inspections (every 6 months).
b. Sediment removal.
C. Mowing and re -vegetation of side slopes.
d. Immediate repair of eroded areas.
e. Maintenance of side slopes in accordance with approved plans and
specifications.
f. Debris removal and unclogging of structures, orifice, catch basins and
piping.
g. Access to all components of the system must be available at all times.
14. Records of maintenance activities must be kept by the permittee. The records will
indicate the date, activity, name of person performing the work and what actions
were taken.
Page 6 of 10

State Stormwater Management Systems
Permit No. SW8 950317 MOD 2
15. Prior to transfer of the permit, the stormwater facilities will be inspected by DWQ
personnel. The facility must be in compliance with all permit conditions. Any
items not in compliance must be repaired or replaced to design condition prior to
the transfer. Records of maintenance activities performed to date will be
required.
16. Decorative spray fountains will be allowed in the stormwater treatment system,
subject to the following criteria:
a. The fountain must draw its water from less than 2' below the permanent
pool surface.
b. Separated units, where the nozzle, pump and intake are connected by
tubing, may be used only if they draw water from the surface in the deepest
part of the pond.
C. The falling water from the fountain must be centered in the pond, away from
the shoreline.
d. The maximum horsepower for the fountain's pump in this pond is 1/6 hp.
III. GENERAL CONDITIONS
This permit is not transferable to any person or entity except after notice to and
approval by the Director. In the event there is either a desire for the facilities to
change ownership, or there is a name change of the Permittee, a completed
"Name/Ownership Change Form" must be submitted to the Division of Water
Quality, signed by the parties involved, along with the applicable documents as
listed on page 2 of the form. The project must be in good standing with DWQ.
The approval of this request will be considered on its merits and may or may not
be approved.
2. The permittee is responsible for compliance with all of the terms and conditions
of this permit until such time as the Director approves the transfer request.
Neither the sale of the project nor the transfer of common area to a third party,
constitutes an approved transfer of the stormwater permit.
3. Failure to abide by the conditions and limitations contained in this permit may
subject the Permittee to enforcement action by the Division of Water Quality, in
accordance with North Carolina General Statute 143-215.6A to 143-215.6C.
4. The issuance of this permit does not preclude the Permittee from complying with
any and all statutes, rules, regulations, or ordinances, which may be imposed by
other government agencies (local, state, and federal), which have jurisdiction.
5. In the event that the facilities fail to perform satisfactorily, including the creation of
nuisance conditions, the Permittee shall take immediate corrective action,
including those as may be required by this Division, such as the construction of
additional or replacement stormwater management systems.
6. The permit may be modified, revoked and reissued or terminated for cause. The
filing of a request for a permit modification, revocation and re -issuance or
termination does not stay any permit condition.
7. Permittee grants permission to staff of the DWQ to access the property for the
purposes of inspecting the stormwater facilities during normal business hours.
8. Approved plans and specifications for this project are incorporated by reference
and are enforceable parts of the permit.
9. The permittee shall notify the Division in writing of any name, ownership or
mailing address changes at least 30 days prior to making such changes.
Page 7 of 10

State Stormwater Management Systems
Permit No. SW8 950317 MOD 2
10. A copy of the approved plans and specifications shall be maintained on file by
the Permittee at all times. At the time the permit is transferred to a new owner,
the permittee shall forward the approved plans to the new owner.
11. The permittee shall submit a permit renewal request at least 180 days prior to the
expiration date of this permit. The renewal request must include the appropriate
documentation and the processing fee. ,
Permit issued this the 5th day of April, 2012.
CAROLINA ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT COMMISSION
Division of Water Quality
By Authority of the Environmental Management Commission
Permit Number SW8 950317 MOD 2
Page 8 of 10

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PERMIT APPLICATION FORM
This form may be photocopied for use as an original
I. GENERAL INFORMATION
1. Project Name (subdivision, facility, or establishment name - should be consistent with project name on plans,
specifications, letters, operation and maintenance agreements, etc.):
ER & Sureical Services Pavilion - Onslow Memorial Hospital
2. Location of Project (street address):
317 Western Boulevard
City:lacksonville County:Onslow Zip:NC
3. Directions to project (from nearest major intersection):
From the intersection of US 17 and NC 24 in Jacksonville north approximately 2 4 miles to Western Blvd
right on Western Blvd approximately 1.1 miles site on right
4- Latitude:34° 45' 46" N Longitude:77° 23' 07" W of the main entrance to the project.
II. PERMIT INFORMATION:
1. a. Specify whether project is (check one): ❑New ®Modification
b.If this application is being submitted as the result of a modification to an existing permit, list the existing
permit numberSW8 950317 , its issue date (if known)August 3, 2006 , and the status of
construction: ❑Not Started ❑Partially Completed* ® Completed' provide a designer's certification
Specify the type of project (check one):
®Low Density ®High Density []brains to an Offsite Stormwater System ❑Other
3. If this application is being submitted as the result of a previously returned application or a letter from DWQ
requesting a state stormwater management permit application, list the stormwater project number, if
assigned, and the previous name of the project, if different than currently
proposed,
4. a. Additional Project Requirements (check applicable blanks; information on required state permits can be
obtained by contacting the Customer Service Center at 1-877-623-6748):
❑CAMA Major
❑NPDES Industrial Stormwater
❑Sedimentation/Erosion Control: 0.35 ac of Disturbed Area
0404/401 Permit: Proposed Impacts
b.If any of these permits have already been acquired please provide the Project Name, Project/Permit Number,
issue date and the type of each permit:
N0V 2 9 2011
Form SWU-101 Version 07Jun2010 Page I of 6

III. CONTACT INFORMATION
1. a. Print Applicant / Signing Official's name and title (specifically the developer, property owner, lessee,
designated government official, individual, etc. who owns the project):
Applicant/Organization:Onslow Memorial Hospital
Signing Official & Title:Damel T. Waller, Senior Vice President
b. Contact information for person listed in item la above:
Street Address:214 New River Dr.
City:Jacksonville State:NC Zip:28540
Mailing Address (if applicable):same
Phone: (910 ) 577-2345 Fax: (910 ) 577-2465
c. Please check the appropriate box. The applicant listed above is:
® The property owner (Skip to Contact Information, item 3a)
❑ Lessee* (Attach a copy of the lease agreement and complete Contact Information, item 2a and 21a below)
❑ Purchaser* (Attach a copy of the pending sales agreement and complete Contact Information, item 2a and
2b below)
❑ Developer* (Complete Contact Information, item 2a and 2b below.)
2. a. Print Property Owner's name and title below, if you are the lessee, purchaser or developer. (This is the
person who owns the property that the project is located on):
Property
Signing Official &
b. Contact information for person listed in item 2a above:
Street Address:
City:
Mailing Address (if
City:
Phone: (_ _ )_
State:
Fax:
3. a. (Optional) Print the name and title of another contact such as the project's construction supervisor or other
person who can answer questions about the project:
Other Contact
Signing Official &
b. Contact information for person listed in item 3a above:
Mailing
City: Stab
Phone: ( ) Fax:
4. Local jurisdiction for building permits: City of Jacksonville
Zip:
Point of Contact:Danny Bryan Phone #: (910 ) 938-5200
RECEIVED
NOV 2 9 2011
BY:�_
Form SWU-101 Version 07Jun2010 Page 2 of 7

IV. PROJECT INFORMATION
In the space provided below, briefly summarize how the stormwater runoff will be treated.
Current permit is a Low Density permit which includes a 'Pocket of High Density" as more fully described in
permit SW8 950317 This project (Driveway/Parking Improvements Plan) spans both the Low Density and
High Density "zones" of that permit. The portion of the project within the Low Density zone results in less
impervious surface (4,630 sf BUA to be removed) . However, that portion of the project within the High
Density zone results in a net increase of 3,660 sf of impervious surface (7,310 sf BUA to be added & 3,650 sf
BUA to be removed) Calculations are attached which indicate that the existing wet detention pond serving
this Pocket of High Density area is more than adequate to accommodate the marinal increase in BUA
associated with this project.
2. a. If claiming vested rights, identify the supporting documents provided and the date they were approved:
❑ Approval of a Site Specific Development Plan or PUD Approval Date:
1-1 Valid Building Permit Issued Date:
❑ Other: Date:
b.If claiming vested rights, identify the regulation(s) the project has been designed in accordance with:
❑ Coastal SW — 1995 ❑ Ph II — Post Construction
3. Stormwater runoff from this project drains to the
4. Total Property Area: 44.72 acres
River basin.
5. Total Coastal Wetlands Area: -0- acres
6. Total Surface Water Area: -0- acres
7. Total Property Area (4) — Total Coastal Wetlands Area (5) — Total Surface Water Area (6) = Total Project
Area'- 44.72 acres
Total project area shall be calculated to exclude the following the normal pool of impounded structures, the area
between the area
of streams and rivers, the area below the Normal High Water (NUM line or Mean High Water
(MHW) line, and coastal wetlands landward from the NHW (or MHW) line. The resultant project area a used to
calculate overall percent built upon area (BUA). Non -coastal wetlands landward of the NHW (or MHW) line may
be included in the total project area.
8. Project percent of impervious area: (Total Impervious Area / Total Project Area) X 100 = <30 %
9. How many drainage areas does the project have?1 (For high density, count 1 for each proposed engineered
stormwater BMP. For low density and other projects, use 1 for the whole property area)
10. Complete the following information for each drainage area identified in Project Information item 9. If there
are more than four drainage areas in the project, attach an additional sheet with the information for each area
provided in the same format as below.
NOV 2 9 2011
BY
Form SWU-101 Version 07Iun2010 Page 3 of 7

+. Ull k-D. qcar LI
n _ I ,Y D A(PIA
Basin Information
Drainage _Area _
Uramage Area _
Dralliage Area _
Drainage Area _
Receiving Stream Name
Scales reek
a ek
Scales Creek
Stream Class
Stream Index um er
- -
- -
- -
Fotal Drainage Area s
s
s
On -site Drainage Area s
s
s
Off -site Dramage Area s
s
Proposed Impervious Area (sf)
295,594 sf
143,527
298,461 s
Impervious Area (total)
49.67.
°
2b.1%
MIm ervious Surface Area
ramage rea -
ramage rea _
ramage rea _
Drainage Area
-site ur mgsLots s
-site Streets s
- -
- -
- -
-site Parking s
On -site Sidewalks s
Other on -site s
-
uture s
-
-
-site s
- -
- -
-
xtstmg s
s
s
s
ota s
s
St
296,461 s
* Stream Class and Index Number can be determined at: http://portal.ncdenr.org/zoeb/wq/ps/esu/classi cations
*" Impervious area is defined as the built upon area including, but not limited to, buildings, roads, parking areas,
sidewalks, gravel areas, etc.
*** Report only that amount of existing BUA that will remain after development. Do not report any existing BUA that
is to be removed and which will be replaced by new BUA.
11. How was the off -site impervious area listed above determined? Provide documentation.
Projects in Union County: Contact DWQ Central Office staff to check if the project is located within a Threatened &
Endangered Species watershed that may be subject to more stringent stormwater requirements as per NCAC 02B .0600.
V. SUPPLEMENT AND O&M FORMS
The applicable state stormwater management permit supplement and operation and maintenance (O&M) forms
must be submitted for each BMP specified for this project. The latest versions of the forms can be downloaded
from hU://portal.ncdenr.org/web/wq/ws/su/bmp-manual.
VI. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS
Only complete application packages will be accepted and reviewed by the Division of Water Quality (DWQ).
A complete package includes all of the items listed below. A detailed application instruction sheet and BMP
checklists are available from http://portal.ncdenr.org/web/wq/ws/su/statesw/forms_docs. The complete
application package should be submitted to the appropriate DWQ Office. (The appropriate office may be
found by locating project on the interactive online map at http://portal.ncdenr.org/web/wq/ws/su/maps.)
Please indicate that the following required information have been provided by initialing in the space provided
for each item. All original documents MUST be signed and initialed in blue ink. Download the latest versions
for each submitted application package from http://portal.ncdenr.org/web/wq/ws/su/statesw/forms_ does.
Initials
1. Original and one copy of the Stormwater Management Permit Application Form.
2. Original and one copy of the signed and notarized Deed Restrictions & Protective Covenants
Form. (if required as per Part VII below)
3. Original of the applicable Supplement Form(s) (sealed, signed and dated) and O&M
agreement(s) for each BMP.
4. Permit application processing fee of $505 payable to NCDENR. (For an Express review, refer to
http://www.envhelp.org/pages/onestopexpress.html for information on the Express program
and the associated fees. Contact the appropriate regional office Express Pe TjCMA
oradditional information and to schedule the required application meeting.) V
R 0 9 2012
Form SWU-101 Version 07Jun2010 Page 4 of 7 oy:_

5. A detailed narrative (one to two pages) describing the stormwater treatment/managementfor v
the project. This is required in addition to the brief summary provided in the Project
Information, item 1.
6. A USGS map identifying the site location. If the receiving stream is reported as class SA or the
receiving stream drains to class SA waters within h mile of the site boundary, include the tiff
mile radius on the map.
7. Sealed, signed and dated calculations.
8. Two sets of plans folded to 8.5" x 14" (sealed, signed, & dated), including:
a. Development/Project name.
b. Engineer and firm.
c. Location map with named streets and NCSR numbers.
d. Legend.
e. North arrow.
I. Scale.
g. Revision number and dates.
Jr. Identify all surface waters on the plans by delineating the normal pool elevation of
impounded structures, the banks of streams and rivers, the MHW or NHW line of tidal
waters, and any coastal wetlands landward of the MHW or NHW lines.
• Delineate the vegetated buffer landward from the normal pool elevation of impounded
structures, the banks of streams or rivers, and the MHW (or NHW) of tidal waters.
i. Dimensioned property/project boundary with bearings & distances.
j. Site Layout with all BUA identified and dimensioned.
k. Existing contours, proposed contours, spot elevations, finished floor elevations.
1. Details of roads, drainage features, collection systems, and stormwater control measures.
m. Wetlands delineated, or a note on the plans that none exist. (Must be delineated by a
qualified person. Provide documentation of qualifications and identify the person who
made the determination on the plans.
n. Existing drainage (including off -site), drainage easements, pipe sizes, runoff calculations.
o. Drainage areas delineated (included in the main set of plans, not as a separate document).
p. Vegetated buffers (where required).
9. Copy of any applicable soils report with the associated SHWT elevations (Please identify
elevations in addition to depths) as well as a map of the boring locations with the existing
elevations and boring logs. Include an 8.5"xll" copy of the NRCS County Soils map with the
project area clearly delineated. For projects with infiltration BMPs, the report should also
include the soil type, expected infiltration rate, and the method of determining the infiltration rate.
(Infiltration Devices submitted to WiRO: Schedule a site visit for DWQ to verify the SHWT prior
to submittal, [phone].)
10. A copy of the most current property deed. Deed book: Page No:
11. For corporations and limited liability corporations (LLC): Provide documentation from the NC
Secretary of State or other official documentation, which supports the titles and positions held
by the persons listed in Contact Information, item la, 2a, and/or 3a per NCAC 2H.1003(e). The
corporation or LLC must be listed as an active corporation in good standing with the NC
Secretary of State, otherwise the application will be returned.
hn://www.secretga.state.nc.us/CoEporations/CSearch.aspx
VII. DEED RESTRICTIONS AND PROTECTIVE COVENANTS
For all subdivisions, outparcels, and future development, the appropriate property restrictions and protective
covenants are required to be recorded prior to the sale of any lot. If lot sizes vary significantly or the proposed
BUA allocations vary, a table listing each lot number, lot size, and the allowable built -upon area must be provided
as an attachment to the completed and notarized deed restriction form. The appropriate deed restrictions and
protective covenants forms can be downloaded from
http://portal.ncdenr.org/web/wq/ws/su/statesw/fo=s_docs. Download the latest versions for each submittal.
In the instances where the applicant is different than the property owner, it is the responsibility of the property
owner to sign the deed restrictions and protective covenants form while the applicant is responsible for ensuring
that the deed restrictions are recorded.
By the notarized signature(s) below, the permit holder(s) certify that the recorded property restrictions and
protective covenants for this project, if required, shall include all the items required in the permit and listed
on the forms available on the website, that the covenants will be binding on all parties and persons claiming
under them, that they will run with the land, that the required covenants cannot be changed or deleted
without concurrence from the NC DWQ, and that they will be recorded prior to -the -sale -of eny'IR.0
NOV 2 9 2011
Form SWU-101 Version 07Jun2010 Page 5 of 7 �,

VIII. CONSULTANT INFORMATION AND AUTHORIZATION
Applicant: Complete this section if you wish to designate authority to another individual and/or firm (such as a
consulting engineer and/or firm) so that they may provide information on your behalf for this project (such as
addressing requests for additional information).
Consulting Engineer:David K. Newsom, PE
Consulting Firm: Crystal Coast Engineering, PA
Mailing Address:3817-3 Freedom Way
City:Hubert State:NC Zip:28539
Phone: (910 ) 325-0006
Email: crystalcoastengQbizec.rr.com
Fax: (910 ) 325-0060
IX. PROPERTY OWNER AUTHORIZATION (if Contact Information, item 2 has been filled out, complete this
section)
I, (print or type name of person listed in Contact Information, item 2a) Leff Hudson , certify that I
own the property identified in this permit application, and thus give permission to (print or type name of person
listed in Contact Information, item la) Daniel Waller with (print or type name of organization listed in
Contact Information, item la) Onslmv Memorial Hospital to develop the project as currently proposed. A copy of
the lease agreement or pending property sales contract has been provided with the submittal, which indicates the
party responsible for the operation and maintenance of the stormwater system.
As the legal property owner I acknowledge, understand, and agree by my signature below, that if my designated
agent (entity listed in Contact Information, item 1) dissolves their company and/or cancels or defaults on their
lease agreement, or pending sale, responsibility for compliance with the DWQ Stormwater permit reverts back to
me, the property owner. As the property owner, it is my responsibility to notify DWQ immediately and submit a
completed Name/Ownership Change Form within 30 days; otherwise I will be operating a stormwater treatment
facility without a valid permit. I understand that the operation of a stormwater treatment facility without a valid
permit is a violation of NC General Statue 143-215.1 and may result in appropriate enforcement action including
the assessment of ' peI p to 5,000 per day, pursuant to NCGS 143-215.6.
Signature: Date:
a Notary Public for the State of r y'A (Wl./lu, County of
(Q), 8 IA , —do hereby certify that S�-kA-YEc.I P-t.16.SOn personally appeared
before me this 11 day of and acknowledge LIW due execution of the application for
a stormwater permit. Witness my hand and official seal,o
;''p10TAgy:�
n..............
.�'
SEAL
My commission expires A� �d &
NOV 2 9 all
Form SWU-101 Version 07Jun2010 Page 6 of 7

JC. APPLICANT'S CERTIFICATION
I, (print or type name of person listed in Contact Information, item la) Daniel T. Waller
certify that the information included on this permit application form is, to the best of my knowledge, correct and
that the project will be constructed in conformance with the approved plans, that the required deed restrictions
and protective covenants will be recorded, and that the proposed project complies with the requirements of the
applicable storm); tt r gffles under;51 AXAC 2H .1000, SL 2006-246 (Ph. Ii — Post Construction) or SL 2008-211.
Date:
I, rA .0 \ L. S.a,v-L v S'c . a Notary Public for the State of PC— County of
C%i�6� do hereby certify that an...�dl LADOl 2r personally appeared
before me this f7 day of �I�,JQ„ 1}�, �nll , and acknow�he dye �ececu of the application for
\<L��/
a stormwater permit. Witness my hand and official seal,
�7—
```````O µ1CM4,p
M <
�n� 9 CA N�
Z=.
� 9 O
MUM
My commission expires �o.N. 15, ZO 13
Nov � 9 20i1
Form SWU-101 Version 07Jun2010 Page 7 of 7

04/04/2012 14:14 9103250060 CRYSTAL COAST ENG PAGE 01/03
205 Ward Rd. # 3
Swansbo , NC 285a4
Tel: [phone]
Fa [phone]
I In �
7b: e V C. �S From: V i
�7s Pages:
Fom q� D -35o -any Date: Li
co
Rft bN lv� e
❑ Fw YayMeM 0 For ReMsw ❑ Fw your w Cl For ye11►1ecards ❑ 4s mquesfad

34/04✓2012 14:14 9103250060 CRYSTAL COAST ENG PAGE 02/03
J-
C stal Coast Eln i
3817-3 Freedom Way
Hubert, N.C. 28539
Tel: [phone])oo0 Fait (glo) 325.0080
EmaA: Gy9tBJ0GWtM9@bae m.wm
April 4, 2012
Mr. Steve G. Pusey
N.C. Division of Water Quality
127 Cardinal Drive Extension
Wilmington, N.C. 28405
Re: Stormwater Project No. SW8 950317
Onslow Memorial Hospital
Onslow County
Dear Mr. Pusey
In your email of 3/26/12 you requested "a secure date for when the permitttee can
submit a plan of action with a schedule for submittal of a permit modification". In that
regard, I met yesterday with Mr. Michael Holdren, Director of Facilities and
Engineering Mgt. for Onslow Memorial Hospital.
During that meeting, Mr. Holdren shared with me plans for a future building
expansion project that when initiated, would trigger another Stormwater Permit
Modification, and thus would also likely trigger enlargement of the existing Pond
No.1 serving High Density Pocket No. 1.
Specifically, the building expansion is proposed in the existing courtyard area
between the original "main" building and the more recently constructed ER $ Surgical
Pavilion. We have labeled this location "Future Project Area" on the Master
Stormwater Plan (revised copy attached). You will note that this "Future Project
Area" is indeed located within the designated drainage area for High Density Pocket
1, as was previously delineated by Mulkey Engineers & Consultants.
Onslow Memorial Hospital understands and agrees that this future building
expansion would trigger another stormwater permit modification. Furthermore
Onslow Memorial Hospital recognizes that this building expansion would likely
require enlargement of existing Pond 1 and intends to include funding for that
expansion in the building project funding.
The proposed building expansion project is currently In the preliminary planning and
budgeting stages, and a detailed project timeline has not yet been developed.
However, it is anticipated that design and permitting for this project would begin in the
next 12 — 18 months.

E;4/04/21112 14:14
y1UJZbU0bV
UPY8IAL UUASI LNU
HAct
0 Page 2
April4, 2012
We are hopeful that this response addresses all concerns and that the requested
permit modification can be issued in the near future. Should you have questions or
additional concerns, please feel free to contact me.
fC Newsom, PE%� ��
CRYSTAL COAST ENGINEERING

y
Pusey, Steven
From:
David Newsom [[e-mail]]
Sent:
Wednesday, April 04, 2012 9:56 AM
To:
Pusey,Steven
Subject:
RE: Onslow Memorial Hospital
Attachments:
Steve Pusey Onslow Memorial Hospital.doc; Stormwater Master Plan.pdf
You were correct ..... I failed to send it ....... waiting on a review of the letter by Mr. Holdren....
He since ok'd the letter ... so here it is....
I will sign and fax ASAP.
From: Pusey, Steven [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Wednesday, April 04, 2012 9:41 AM
To: David Newsom
Cc: Scott, Georgette
Subject: RE: Onslow Memorial Hospital
Importance: High
Just checking the status of this permit application. Can they give us a secure submittal date for when they can submit a
plan of action with schedule? This is all we need.
Please advise ASAP.
Thanks,
Steve
From: David Newsom [mailto:crystalcoasteng([e-mail]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 27, 2012 8:07 AM
To: Pusey, Steven
Cc: Scott, Georgette; Johnson, Kelly
Subject: RE: Onslow Memorial Hospital
Sounds reasonable....
Let me get with the Hospital.... and see if we can formulate a plan ..... and schedule of implementation.
From: Pusey, Steven[mailto:[e-mail]
Sent: Monday, March 26, 2012 2:32 PM
To: David Newsom
Cc: Scott, Georgette; Johnson, Kelly
Subject: RE: Onslow Memorial Hospital
Importance: High
David,
OK, here's the deal. We can issue this permit as soon as we get a secure date for when the permittee can submit a plan
of action with a schedule for submittal of a permit modification. We will add a line in the permit which reads as follows:

In order to validate this permit approval, and remain in compliance with this permit modification, the permittee
must submit a plan to DWQ by' (DATE) which includes a schedule for the submittal of a permit modification that
includes revised plans for current and future development.
We are holding the permit until we receive your response. Let me know if you have any questions.
Regards,
Steve Pusey
From: David Newsom [mailto:crystalcoasteng(albizec.rr.com]
Sent: Monday, March 19, 2012 10:19 AM
To: Pusey, Steven
Cc: Scott, Georgette; Johnson, Kelly
Subject: RE: Onslow Memorial Hospital
Just let me know if I can help....
Will be glad when/if we can finish this one ....... It seems as if I have been "tortured" with a "slew" of these difficult ones
of late......
Why can't I get any "easy" projects anymore?
From: Pusey, Steven [mailto:steven.pusey(alncdenr.gov]
Sent: Monday, March 19, 2012 10:10 AM
To: David Newsom
Cc: Scott, Georgette; Johnson, Kelly
Subject: RE: Onslow Memorial Hospital
Thanks, David. I will get back with you ASAP after internal discussions here.
Steve
From: David Newsom [mailto:c[ystalcoasteng(a)bizec.rr.com]
Sent: Monday, March 19, 2012 9:24 AM
To: Pusey, Steven
Subject: RE: Onslow Memorial Hospital
No, unfortunately I cannot explain other to say that the original BUA numbers (per 11/16/11) were premised on the
original BUA figures from the 2006 Permit Modification. At the time of those calculations, I did NOT realize the
unorthodox fashion that permit was written (i.e., was written on the basis of ADDITIONAL BUA as opposed to the
customary format of TOTAL BUA). Therefore, we were, in a sense comparing "apples and oranges ....... the very reason
for the most recent accounting of BUA (everything on the same basis).
In short, the most recent calculations I prepared (copy attached) were prepared on the same format as that used in the
Mulkey Calculations. If you will study those (Mulkey) calculations carefully, you will realize that the existing Pond 1 WAS
NOT sized, at least in area, to accommodate all (TOTAL) BUA tributary to it (sized on the basis of ADDITIONAL BUA). A
further study of those calculations reveals that the VOLUME (at least the required storage volume) was adequately sized
based on TOTAL BUA.

' t
In order to validate this permit approval, and remain in compliance with this permit modification, the permittee
must submit a plan to DWQ by'
(DATE) which includes a schedule for the submittal of a permit modification that
includes revised plans for current and future development.
We are holding the permit until we receive your response. Let me know if you have any questions.
Regards,
Steve Pusey
From: David Newsom [mailto:crystalcoastengl7a bizec.rr.com]
Sent: Monday, March 19, 2012 10:19 AM
To: Pusey, Steven
Cc: Scott, Georgette; Johnson, Kelly
Subject: RE: Onslow Memorial Hospital
Just let me know if I can help....
Will be glad when/if we can finish this one ....... It seems as if I have been "tortured" with a "slew" of these difficult ones
of late......
Why can't I get any "easy" projects anymore?
From: Pusey, Steven [mailto:steven.puseyCo ncdenr.gov]
Sent: Monday, March 19, 2012 10:10 AM
To: David Newsom
Cc: Scott, Georgette; Johnson, Kelly
Subject: RE: Onslow Memorial Hospital
Thanks, David. I will get back with you ASAP after internal discussions here.
Steve
From: David Newsom [mailto:crystalcoastengcd)bizec.rr.com]
Sent: Monday, March 19, 2012 9:24 AM
To: Pusey, Steven
Subject: RE: Onslow Memorial Hospital
No, unfortunately I cannot explain other to say that the original BUA numbers (per 11/16/11) were premised on the
original BUA figures from the 2006 Permit Modification. At the time of those calculations, I did NOT realize the
unorthodox fashion that permit was written (i.e., was written on the basis of ADDITIONAL BUA as opposed to the
customary format of TOTAL BUA). Therefore, we were, in a sense comparing "apples and oranges ...... the very reason
for the most recent accounting of BUA (everything on the same basis).
In short, the most recent calculations I prepared (copy attached) were prepared on the same format as that used in the
Mulkey Calculations. If you will study those (Mulkey) calculations carefully, you will realize that the existing Pond 1 WAS
NOT sized, at least in area, to accommodate all (TOTAL) BUA tributary to it (sized on the basis of ADDITIONAL BUA). A
further study of those calculations reveals that the VOLUME (at least the required storage volume) was adequately sized
based on TOTAL BUA.

In short, it appears that the pond was not sized (at least in area) to serve any of the pre-existing (exempt) BUA tributary
to it. Although I understand it is typical to "exempt' such Pre 88 BUA from Low Density permits, I did NOT think (until
this situation anyway) is permissible to exclude such Pre 88 BUA from pond calculations, if said BUA is tributary to said
pond (it is in this case).
Although unorthodox (the only situation I am aware of) I can only presume that DWQ was aware and approved of this
design rationale (i.e., "area" sized on ADDITIONAL / "volume" sized on TOTAL). Therefore, when evaluating the
"adequacy" of the existing pond, I used the same design rationale. Please note, that even using that unorthodox design
rationale, the existing pond DID NOT have capacity (at least in terms of area) to accommodate the additional BUA
associated with this project (parking improvements). However, a subsequent Pond Asbuilt survey reveals that the
existing Pond 1 was actually constructed LARGER (at least in area) than the design/permit conditions. That additional
area is sufficient to accommodate the small amount of BUA associated with this project (parking improvements), USING
THE SAME DESISN RATIONALE AS USED IN THE MULKEY CALCULATIONS (excluding pre-existing BUA).
I think it could be argued, at least in consideration to TODAYS design requirements, that the existing Pond 1 is perhaps
undersized (at least in area) for the TOTAL AMOUNT OF BUA (including Pre -Existing) tributary to it. I have made the
Hospital aware of my opinions/findings in this regard, and informed them they should NOW beginning budgeting for
expansion of this existing pond, as it is NOT, in my opinion, adequate to accommodate any more tributary BUA (at least
beyond the small amount presently proposed).
The hospital indicates that they are already in the planning/budgeting phase of another future parking improvements
project which will likely be under design this summer. They indicate that they will indeed plan on enlarging the existing
Pond 1 at that time. They also indicate that they currently have a serious lack of parking, and very much appreciate the
DWQ's understanding, at that they are hopeful that this project (March 2012 Parking Improvements) can be approved as
submitted with the understanding that the future parking project will include a pond enlargement.
Sorry for being so long winded.... but as you know, this is NOT a simple issue.
From: Pusey, Steven [mailto:steven.puseyCla ncdenr.gov]
Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2012 11:02 AM
To: David Newsom
Cc: Pascal Pandosy
Subject: Onslow Memorial Hospital
Importance: High
David,
I ran the new numbers and it checks out. However, now we need to finalize the numbers for the pond. If I take the total
BUA of 295,594 sf and subtract the previous allowed pre-88 BUA amount of 115,179 sf, I get 180,415 sf BUA to be
treated in the pond.
Previously, you calculated 173,431 sf BUA was to be treated in the pond (reference sealed calcs of 11/16/11). However,
your recent calculations show an additional 6,639 sf on top of the original 169,771 sf BUA, yielding a total of 176,410 sf.
So, the difference between 180,415 and 176,410 is 4,005 sf. Any idea where that difference comes from?
We need your revised calculations (similar to the sealed calcs of 11/16/11) to alleviate this discrepancy. Furthermore,
you will need to submit a revised Wet Detention Pond Supplement form and if the normal pool level needs to be raised,
a new O&M Agreement.
Regards,

205-3 Ward Road
Swanslooro, NC 28584
Tel: [phone] i
Fax: [phone]
I
To: Steve Pusey
CC:
Rs
From: David K. Newsom
Date: March 8, 2012
❑ Urgent ❑ For Review ❑ Please Comment ❑ Please Reply ❑ Please Recycle
Per your email of Y7112, we submit the following:
• Master Stormwater Plan (3 copies)
• BUA Supplement (3 copies)
• BUA Summary Spreadsheet
• Revised Sheet 4 of Application
• Existing Pond Adequacy Calculations
'E C E I V - it',
MAR 6 9 2012
ti,:—

BUA Summary
As of March 2012 (Prior to March 2012 Parking Improvements)
Including March 2012 Improvements
Pre 1988
High
High
Remaining
High High
Remaining
Total Existing
Existing
Density
Density
Low Density
Density Density
Low Density
BUA('I
BUA"'
Pocket 10)
Pocket 214)
Project Area
Pocket 11'II Pocket 2 ")
Project Area(e)
BUA Type
(sf)
(sf)
(sf)
(sf)
(sf)
(sf) (sf)
(sf)
On -site Bldg
211,135
92,675
84,329
9,824
116,982
84,329 9,824
116,982
On -site Streets
0
0
0
0
0
0 0
0
On -site Parking
433,136
169,231
175,865
90,195
167,076
182,504 90,195
164,813
On -site Sidewalks
42,557
2,626
23,383
2,508
16,666
23,383 2,508
16,666
Other on -site
0
0
0
0
0 0
0
Future
0
0
0
41,000
0
0 41,000
0
Offsite
5,378
5,378
5,378
0
0
5,378 0
0
Existing BUA
n/a
n/a
0
incl. above
0
0 incl. above
0
Subtotal
692,206
269,910
288,955
143,527
300,724
295,594 143,527
298,461
Pre 88 BUA
269,910
n/a
18,245
51,2241
200,441
18,245 51,224
198,178
Total BUA NIC Pre 1
422,296
n/a
270,710
92,303
100,283
92,303
100,283
Drain/Project Area
1,956,725
1,956,725
594,158
172,945
1,189,622
594,158 172,945
1,189,622
% Impervious TOTAL a
35.4
n/a
48.6
83.0
25.3
49.8 83.0
25.1
% Impervious Nicvxte
21.6
n/a
n/a
n/a
8.4
n/a n/a
8.4
(')Based on as -built survey of ALL BUA.
1�)Based on Boney "Existing Site Plan of Feb. 1987)
(;)Based upon As -built Survey - Not ADDITIONAL BUA as per permit
14)Based upon COJ SW Permit 09.05.003
(S)Percent BUA coverage on basis of TOTAL BUA (including Pre 1988 BUA)
(6)Percent BUA coverage on basis of TOTAL BUA less exempt Pre 1988 BUA
i'IHigh Density Pocket 1 including March 2012 Parking Improvements (Deduct 6,123 sf / Add 12,762 sf = Net Add 6,639 sf)
(8)Low Density Project Area including March 2012 Parking Improvements (Deduct 2,263 sf (also 2,263 Pre 1988 BUA))
ECEIVE
MAR 0 9 1012
�v:

Crystal Coast Engineering, PA
205-3 Ward Road
Swansboro, N.C. 28584
Business License #G2553 Tel: [phone] Fax: [phone]
Email: crvstalwasteng@b¢ec.a.com
Existing Pond Adequacy Calculations
Pond No. 1 — Onslow Memorial Hospital
1. Confirm Adequacy of Existing Pond Surface Area
Based on Mulkey Calculations dated 8/1/06, pond area was "sized for the increase" in BUA as follows
(Italics indicate verbatim Calculation from Mulkey Calculations):
The proposed project will add 169,771 SF or 3.90 ac of impervious area.
The basin will be sized for this increase:
3.90 ac 113.64 ac = 0. 286 or 28. 6 %
From Table 2.3, SAIDA ratios for 90% TSS and depth of X.
SAIDA = 3.346
SA=(3.3461100) (13.64 ac) (43,560 st) = 19,881 sf
(Design) Surface area of Perm. Pool = 19,930 sf, therefore, OK.
This project (March 2012 Parking Improvements) is adding 6,639 sf of parking BUA, therefore, using the same design
rationale as previously approved and permitted, the above Mulkey Calculations may be updated as follows:
6,639 sf = 0.15 ac
The basin should be sized for the following increase:
(3.90 ac + 0.15 ac) / 13.64 ac = 0.297 or 29.7%
From Table 2.3, SA/DA ratios for 90% TSS and depth of 3.0:
SA/DA = 3.46
SA=(3.46/100) (13.64 ac) (43,560 sf) = 20,594 sf
"Asbuilt" Surface Area of Perm Pool = 21,884, therefore, OK. E C E d EP'
MAR 0 9 2012
k3Y:

' F.
.� ';�,_.
� '�T:'
-., � ..
1 r'; .
J 'Ji ,l
�� =1
• � J

l
2. Confirm Adequacy of Temporary Pool Volume
Based on Mulkey Calculations dated 8/1/06, pond temporary pool was "designed for the 1" storm" as
follows (Italics indicate verbatim Calculation from Mulkey Calculations):
Rv = 0.05 + 0.009(l) / = 6, 54113.63 = 0.48 Rv = a 482
(Rv) (1/12') (13.64 ac) (43560 so = 23,865 cf
Volume of the Temp Pool = 24,966 cf OK
This project (March 2012 Parking Improvements) is adding 6,639 sf of parking BUA, therefore, using the same design
rationale as previously approved and permitted, the above Mulkey Calculations may be updated as follows:
1=(6.54ac+0.15ac) /13.63ac=0.491 Rv=0.492
(0.492) (1/12") (13.64 ac) (43,560 sf) = 24,348 cf
Design Volume of Temp Pool = 24,966 cf, therefore OK.

Pusey, Steven
From: David Newsom [[e-mail]]
Sent: Wednesday, March 07, 2012 10:30 AM
To: 'David Newsom'; Pusey, Steven
Cc: Brian Jarman
Subject: RE: Onslow Memorial Hospital - SW8 950317
Attachments: BUA Summary2.xlsx, BUA Area Matrix - As of March 2012.pdf; BUA Areas - 2012 Parking
Improvements.pdf; Onslow Memorial Master SW Plan.pdf
Steve
I am convinced that at this point it is nearly (if not completely) impossible to reconcile the 2006 BUA figures in the
Mulkey Calculations and the 2006 Permit itself with the TOTAL BUA that actually now exists on the ground.
The ONLY way I know to "reconcile' is to base ALL BUA measurements on the actual recent Asbuilt Survey. Note, the
BUA numbers will NOTjive with the 2006 permit, for various reasons (that permit written on basis of ADDITIONAL BUA
and the Existing BUA used in the calculations does not distinguish between pre and post 1988 BUA).
I have revised the "accounting" so that now EVERYTHING is based on a constant, that being the recently completed AS -
Built Survey which depicts ALL BUA on site, including that within both pockets of high density and the resulting Low
Density Project area.
Attached is a New BUA summary spreadsheet on that basis....
Also attached are the AutoCad "worksheets" where each BUA measurement for each category was
measured/computed.
Take a look at this, and see if this approach makes sense to you ..... I am convinced it is the ONLY way to reconcile
"Permitted BUA" to the ACTUAL BUA on the ground.... which in reality is what I think we are concerned about.
From: David Newsom [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Wednesday, March 07, 2012 8:33 AM
To: 'Pusey, Steven'
Subject: RE: Onslow Memorial Hospital - SW8 950317
That is because DWQ wrote a permit in 2006 on the basis of ADDITIONAL built upon area .... and not on the customary
basis of TOTAL built upon area. (i.e., "apples and oranges").
That 2006 permit indicates NO existing BUA, even though the calculations reflect 115,179 sf of existing BUA. Nor does
the permit account for 5,378 of offsite BUA that is included in the Pond Calculations. Further complicating the situation
is the fact that there is no breakdown for that existing 115,179 sf...some of that BUA was removed and replaced with
new BUA....some was not....
The only way I know to fix this ..... is to go back and measure after the fact... based on the Asbuilt Survey ... the amount of
TOTAL BUA for each category exist within High Density Pocket 1.
From: Pusey, Steven[mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 06, 2012 6:29 PM
To: David Newsom
Subject: RE: Onslow Memorial Hospital - SW8 950317

r
Pusey, Steven
From: David Newsom [[e-mail]]
Sent: Wednesday, March 07, 2012 8:33 AM
To: Pusey, Steven
Subject: RE: Onslow Memorial Hospital - SW8 950317
That is because DWQ wrote a permit in 2006 on the basis of ADDITIONAL built upon area .... and not on the customary
basis of TOTAL built upon area. (i.e., "apples and oranges').
That 2006 permit indicates NO existing BUA, even though the calculations reflect 115,179 sf of existing BUA. Nor does
the permit account for 5,378 of offsite BUA that is included in the Pond Calculations. Further complicating the situation
is the fact that there is no breakdown for that existing 115,179 sf... some of that BUA was removed and replaced with
new BUA .... some was not....
The only way I know to fix this ..... is to go back and measure after the fact... based on the Asbuilt Survey ... the amount of
TOTAL BUA for each category exist within High Densitv Pocket 1.
From: Pusey, Steven [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 06, 2012 6:29 PM
To: David Newsom
Subject: RE: Onslow Memorial Hospital - SW8 950317
David,
I reviewed your BUA summary spreadsheet and the numbers don't make sense. For example, the subtotal BUA adds up
to more than the total existing BUA on the as -built survey. Why is this? You need to work with our spreadsheet or at
least make sure that everything adds up correctly.
We would like to write the permit as follows: Total Area = HD pocket 1 + HD pocket 2 + LD area (reference our
spreadsheet).
Please revise and resubmit.
Thanks,
Steve
From: David Newsom[mailto:crystalcoasteng(albizec.rr.com]
Sent: Monday, March 05, 2012 2:48 PM
To: Pusey, Steven
Subject: RE: Onslow Memorial Hospital - SW8 950317
Please disregard EVERYTHING submitted up to this point, and review the following, prior to our re -submittal.
First, review the attached SW Master Plan. Based upon information obtained from your office, and provided by the
Hospital, we have identified all PRE 1988 BUA, have added the Drainage Area Boundaries for both pockets of High
Density, and have added the BUA for THIS PROJECT (i.e., March 2012 Parking Improvements).
On the basis of the new Master SW Plan, we have prepared a totally new spreadsheet, which clearly identifies the BUA
in the 3 drainage basins (High Density Pocket 1, High Density Pocket 2 and Remaining Low Density Project Area), both
PRIOR TO this project, and INCLUDING THIS PROJECT.

Pusey, Steven
From: David Newsom [[e-mail])
Sent: Monday, March 05, 2012 2:48 PM
To: Pusey, Steven
Subject: RE: Onslow Memorial Hospital - SW8 950317
Attachments: Onslow Memorial Master SW Plan.pdf; BUA Summary.xlsx, revised page 4 of 7 sw app.pdf
Please disregard EVERYTHING submitted up to this point, and review the following, prior to our re -submittal.
First, review the attached SW Master Plan. Based upon information obtained from your office, and provided by the
Hospital, we have identified all PRE 1988 BUA, have added the Drainage Area Boundaries for both pockets of High
Density, and have added the BUA for THIS PROJECT (i.e., March 2012 Parking Improvements).
On the basis of the new Master SW Plan, we have prepared a totally new spreadsheet, which clearly identifies the BUA
in the 3 drainage basins (High Density Pocket 1, High Density Pocket 2 and Remaining Low Density Project Area), both
PRIOR TO this project, and INCLUDING THIS PROJECT.
As you can see, the "magic number" is the % Impervious in the Remaining Low Density Area (exclusive of Pre 88 BUA).
As you can see, that number is 22.3%. In accordance with DWQ policy, no credit has been provided for that Pre 88 BUA
that was removed and subsequently replaced with new BUA.
I have also revised Page 4 of the SW Application accordingly (also attached).
If you are OK with ALL of the above, I am proceeding with additional calculations to demonstrate that Existing Pond No.
1 (High Density Pocket No. 1) can accommodate the additional 6,639 sf (yes, that number also has changed) associated
with these parking improvements.
From: Pusey, Steven [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Tuesday, February 28, 2012 8:30 AM
To: David Newsom
Subject: RE: Onslow Memorial Hospital - SW8 950317
OK. File is ready up at front desk.
Steve
From: David Newsom [mailto:crystalcoasteng(a)bizec.rr com]
Sent: Tuesday, February 28, 2012 7:27 AM
To: Pusey, Steven
Subject: RE: Onslow Memorial Hospital - SW8 950317
She will be there.
Thanks
From: Pusey, Steven [mailto:steven.puseyCalncdenr.gov]
Sent: Monday, February 27, 2012 3:41 PM

To: David Newsom
Subject: RE: Onslow Memorial Hospital - SW8 950317
Ok. I'll set it up from 10 —11 am tomorrow morning. Tell them to try to be on time because someone else is coming in
at 11 am.
Steve
From: David Newsom [mailto:crystalcoastenaCa)bizec.rr.com]
Sent: Monday, February 27, 2012 3:27 PM
To: Pusey, Steven
Cc: Jeanie at CCE
Subject: RE: Onslow Memorial Hospital - SW8 950317
Yes ... anytime after 10.
From: Pusey, Steven [mailto:steven.pusey()a ncdenr.gov]
Sent: Monday, February 27, 2012 3:01 PM
To: David Newsom
Subject: RE: Onslow Memorial Hospital - SW8 950317
Tomorrow looks good all day. What time do you want me to set the appointment for?
Also, FYI, if they need to make copies of the drawings, they will have to go offsite to Allways Graphics, with supervision
by a DWQ employee. Payment will be handled directly between your firm and Allways Graphics for these copies.
Typically, supervision is handled by either Cameron Weaver or Janet Russell. Just ask for their assistance at the front
desk.
Steve
From: David Newsom [mailto:crystalcoasteng(a)bizec.rr.com]
Sent: Monday, February 27, 2012 2:04 PM
To: Pusey, Steven
Subject: RE: Onslow Memorial Hospital - SW8 950317
Yes .... I will send Jeannie or Pascal down there..... Please have that drawing handy so we can get a copy
Thanks
From: Pusey, Steven [mailto:steven.ousey(dncdenr.gov]
Sent: Monday, February 27, 2012 2:00 PM
To: David Newsom
Subject: RE: Onslow Memorial Hospital - SW8 950317
The drawings are size 24 x 36 so you will need to come to Wilmington and make copies if you can't get them directly
from Mulkey. I think Mulkey is located in Raleigh. I can make a file review appointment for you if you wish.
Steve
From: David Newsom [mailto:crystalcoasteng(cbbizec rr.com]
Sent: Monday, February 27, 2012 1:55 PM

To: Pusey, Steven
Subject: RE: Onslow Memorial Hospital - SW8 950317
How best for me to get that info.
From: Pusey, Steven [mailto:steven.pusey(alncdenr.aov]
Sent: Monday, February 27, 2012 1:50 PM
To: David Newsom
Subject: RE: Onslow Memorial Hospital - SW8 950317
Yes, there are drawings that show the drainage area boundaries for pre and post construction, and showing delineation
of BUA such as sidewalks, parking lots, and buildings. They are located in an engineering report booklet sealed on 8-1-06
by Stanley Fortier of Mulkey.
Steve
From: David Newsom [mailto:crystalcoasteng(ubbizec.rr.com]
Sent: Monday, February 27, 2012 11:59 AM
To: Pusey, Steven
Subject: RE: Onslow Memorial Hospital - SW8 950317
Steve
Is there anything in your file that show the Drainage Area for the 2006 pond (Mulkey Pond). Would be nice to have that
drainage area shown on my Master Plan that I am developing.
From: Pusey, Steven [mailto:steven.pusey(d)ncdenr.gov]
Sent: Monday, February 27, 2012 9:16 AM
To: David Newsom
Cc: Johnson, Kelly; 'Brian Jarman'
Subject: RE: Onslow Memorial Hospital - SW8 950317
David,
I checked the calculation sheet from Mulkey that we have in the permit file. Please reference the attached. These
numbers match the permit data and our data sheet. Hopefully, this answers your questions. Give me a call if we need
to discuss.
Thanks,
Steve
From: David Newsom [mailto:crystalcoasteng(a)bizec.rr.com]
Sent: Sunday, February 26, 2012 1:49 PM
To: Pusey, Steven
Cc: Johnson, Kelly; 'Brian Jarman'
Subject: RE: Onslow Memorial Hospital - SW8 950317
As I was not involved in the 2006 application whatsoever, I am a little reluctant to accept figures from that application
(page 2 of 6) that were PREPARED BY OTHERS (I have no absolutely no way of verifying those numbers).
Also, I question the validity of the DA2 (HD Pocket 12006 DWQ) figure for Pre1988 BUA DA2.... I see on sheet 3 of your
spreadsheet where the 115,179 sf appears on Mulkey calculation sheet, however, it does not appear that any of the

other figures on that calc sheet correspond to the actual permit data. That being the case, are we comfortable relying
on that figure?
Is short, I think it difficult if not impossible to "deduct out' pre1988 BUA using only the permit records available to us.
From: Pusey, Steven [mailto:steven.pusey(ancdenr gov]
Sent: Friday, February 24, 2012 10:21 AM
To: David Newsom
Cc: Johnson, Kelly; Brian Jarman
Subject: RE: Onslow Memorial Hospital - SW8 950317
David,
We are using the 2006 permit to define the pre-1988 BUA. See attached page 2/4 of the permit. The amounts are
260,924 sf in DA1 and 115,179 sf in DA2, the HD pocket. Also, it appears that the Jax permit had no pre-1988 BUA. So
the total pre-1988 BUA is the sum of these amounts or 376,103 sf.
Please reference the attached excel spreadsheet which shows the complete breakdown and overall density calculation.
I need you to verify these numbers are correct and send it back with your PE stamp.
Let me know if you have any questions.
Regards,
Steve
From: David Newsom [mailto:crystalcoasteng(albizec.rr.com]
Sent: Friday, February 24, 2012 8:50 AM
To: Pusey, Steven
Cc: Johnson, Kelly; Brian Jarman
Subject: RE: Onslow Memorial Hospital - SW8 950317
Yes... Looks good to me.....
But, I need the Hospitals help to additionally break out the pre 1988 BUA from the Total Existing categories ..... I need to
make them understand that it is to their benefit to do so ...... I think I can do that, but just need their help.
Brian
Any response from the Hospital? Steve might be willing to write this permit modification for the parking now, but the
Hospital really should spend the time/money to differentiate the pre 1988 BUA.
It could be as simple as someone from the hospital "color coding" your asbuilt survey (pre 1988 and post 1988)..... If I get
that info, I can then re -measure all the BUA (quite an undertaking in itself), and differentiate what MAY BE EXEMPT BUA
from the Total BUA. This is certainly in the Hospitals interests, particularly if they ever intend to do additional
development in the future.
From: Pusey, Steven [mailto:steven.pusey(&ncdenr.gov]
Sent: Thursday, February 23, 2012 3:19 PM
To: David Newsom
Cc: Johnson, Kelly
Subject: RE: Onslow Memorial Hospital - SW8 950317
Importance: High

David,
I corrected the "Remaining Low Density" numbers slightly due to math errors. Please confirm that this is now correct.
changed the total BUA for DA1 to be 465,088 sf (including new and pre-88 BUA).
This time, I attached the file.
Steve
From: David Newsom [mailto:crystalcoasteng(abizec.rr.com]
Sent: Thursday, February 23, 2012 1:20 PM
To: Pusey, Steven
Subject: RE: Onslow Memorial Hospital - SW8 950317
Looks fine to me
From: Pusey, Steven [mailto:steven.pusey( ncdenr.gov]
Sent: Wednesday, February 22, 2012 6:56 PM
To: David Newsom
Subject: RE: Onslow Memorial Hospital - SW8 950317
Importance: High
David,
Please confirm that the information in the attached file that I revised is correct. Let me know if you have any questions.
Thanks,
Steve
From: David Newsom [mailto:crystalcoasteng(albizec.rr.com]
Sent: Wednesday, February 22, 2012 1:16 PM
To: Pusey, Steven; 'Brian Jarman'
Cc: Johnson, Kelly; Scott, Georgette; Lewis,Linda; Pat Donovan -Potts
Subject: RE: Onslow Memorial Hospital - SW8 950317
Steve
See the revised Summary, where I added FUTURE BUA as requested.....
Be aware, however, that City of Jacksonville permits (as well as Application Forms) are completely different from DWQ
forms, and the COJ permits do not specifically identify and classify "FUTURE" BUA as does DWQ permits (i.e., "apples
and oranges")
In short, although I designed the pond for the Oncology Center (i.e., the Jax issued permit) to include an allowance for
FUTURE 41,000 sf, the City Permit does not set aside, or even identify for that matter, that "FUTURE" BUA (at least to my
knowledge).
I have, for years now, tried to convince the City to simply adopt the DWQ Application Forms and Permit
formats.... however they did/have not. It would be much simpler for those of us who have to operate in both "realms" if
the formats were the same (or even SIMILAR) for that matter...

Pat
I know you guys like your permit applications forms and Permit Format.... but the fact that they are SO DIFFERENT from
DWQ forms makes "reconciling" projects such as this (Onslow Memorial Hospital) very difficult.......
At the very least, I think your Permit Application package should include a Page 3 of 6 of the DWQ SW application form
(i.e., Drainage Area Chart).... and your Permits themselves I thing ought to include a "Design Criteria" section (including
info such as Drainage Area and a breakdown of BUA) similar to the DWQ permits. Without such documentation, it is
difficult or impossible to "reconcile" BUA after the fact (as I am trying to do now).
Not trying to be critical.... but rather helpful.... Let me know if I can help.
From: Pusey, Steven [mailto:steven.pusey(&ncdenr.gov]
Sent: Wednesday, February 22, 2012 12:08 PM
To: David Newsom; 'Brian Jarman'
Cc: Johnson, Kelly; Scott, Georgette
Subject: RE: Onslow Memorial Hospital - SW8 950317
Importance: High
It appears that my preliminary calculations of overall percent density may not be correct. So, I need for you to double
check and revise your spreadsheet. In order to properly evaluate the BUA for this permit, it looks like you need to add
some things. Here are my questions:
1) Does your column 1 (Total Existing BUA) include Pre-1988 BUA?
2) Does your column 2 (HD pocket) include Pre-1988 BUA?
3) Does your column 1 include the additional 3,660 sf BUA from the HD pocket for this permit? Also, is this
included in your column 2?
4) It appears that you have not included the 41,000 sf future BUA in the Jacksonville permit. You should include
this as BUA since it has already been permitted. Shouldn't it go in your column 3 (Jax permit)?
5) Your overall density calculation should exclude all pre-88 BUA and the DA associated with it. Also, you may want
to exclude the Jacksonville permit from your project area.
Please revise and resubmit by tomorrow. Let me know if you need more time or have any questions.
Thanks,
Steve
From: David Newsom [mailto:crystalcoasteng0bizec.rr.com]
Sent: Thursday, February 16, 2012 1:54 PM
To: Pusey, Steven; 'Brian Jarman'
Cc: Johnson, Kelly
Subject: RE: Onslow Memorial Hospital - SW8 950317
Here are my numbers .... as they stand at this juncture....
Column 1 "Total Existing BUA" is my measurement of ALL BUA that exist on the site, based on the AsBuilt Survey that
John Pierces office has provided.

Pusey, Steven
From: Johnson, Kelly
Sent: Wednesday, February 22, 2012 4:01 PM
To: Pusey, Steven
Cc: Scott, Georgette; Lewis,Linda
Subject: RE: Final Calcs. - Onslow Memorial
Attachments: 950317 MOD 2 worksheet KJ 4 2012 02 22 Short Version2.xlsx
Steve,
I talked with Linda about the methodology for calculating this, and it is in the attached file. We just need to get the
following data finalized. It needs to show what is permitted to be built not just what has been surveyed. He needs to
include the 41,000 future permitted under Jacksonville because they are allowed to build it. He also needs to figure out
what is going on with the 51,224 below. If 51,224 is included in the Jacksonville permit then it needs to be included in
the total and not taken out of the LID DA. (The numbers can't be negative.) Once we have the data in this table we will
be able to move forward.
X
Total DA2 DA3 DA3
HD Pocket 1 HD Jax LD
(2006 DWty
Impervious (Pre1988+"new")
bldg
210,469
69,313
9,824
131,332
street
0
0
0
0
parking
(includes 3,660sf applying for in 2012)
436,796
95,885
38,971
301,940
sidewalk
42,557
8,233
2,508
31,816
other
0
0
1 51,224
-51,224
offsite
0
0
0
0
future
41,000
0
41,000
SUA Total (Pre1988+"new")
730,822
173,431
143,527
413,864
From: Pusey, Steven
Sent: Wednesday, February 22, 2012 3:26 PM
To: Johnson, Kelly
Cc: Scott, Georgette
Subject: Final Calcs. - Onslow Memorial
Kelly,
Here are the final calcs for Onslow Memorial Hospital. I did the best I could with the numbers given by David Newsom.
By these calculations, it passes the 30% rule for the low density section by Option 2 method. Also, the overall % density
is lower than 30•A when you exclude the 115,179 sf pre-88 BUA, which was originally excluded in the pond design for our
HD pocket.
Steve

l��- Y. - v1ti T+-. - S- i_'r o-. .- v ..-� ... tom•.-.: 'i": � }' .3 .. .'u'
.i.r ^[ 1! .- .._ .. .�- -
-_ • ♦ - -. .. v �..
Ll
1
_4
I_-- - - - - .i.,
iK � Q.JI � V!r'i!(J •. .. � l!.'t{'i :::�.-'hb,'C._
tll ,
-�P .. .Y e'°Ili'.. n':j�J :... :'f". � \• s -.1\: �Y,,.�
i91<-

Summary of BUA , lZev, 2-
Onslow Memorial Hospital (Permit No. SW8 950317)
Revised to include new BUA for this permit
22-Feb-12
Total Area =
1,948,003 sf
44.72 AC
Total BUA Presently Existing on Hospital Tract
On -site Bldg
On -site Streets
On -site Parking
On -site Sidewalks
Other on -site
Off -site
Future
Pre-1988
Total Existing
BUAM
210,469
0
436,796
42,557
incl above (4)
incl above
Ir]
41,0001
High Density
Pocket 112)
69,313
0
95,885
8,233
High Density
Pocket 2(3)
9,824
0
38,971
2,508
51,224
0
41,000
0
Remaining
Low Density
131,332
0
301,940
31,816
-51,224
0
Subtotal 730,822I 288,6101 143,5271 I 298,6851 Low Density
Area % BUA =
(1)Based on as -built survey of ALL BUA & includes new BUA for this permit.
(2)Aug 3, 2006 Modification (ER & Surgical Services Pavilion).
(3)City of Jax Permit 09.05.003 (Oncology Pavilion)
(4) Other on -site BUA and Pre-1988 BUA are hidden in the numbers for buildings, parking, and sidewalks.
15.33 %

I
I
�
44:
i

Pusey, Steven
From: David Newsom [[e-mail]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 22, 2012 12:48 PM
To: Pusey, Steven; 'Brian Jarman'
Cc: Johnson, Kelly; Scott, Georgette
Subject: RE: Onslow Memorial Hospital - SW8 950317
See below.... Responses in RED
From: Pusey, Steven [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 22, 2012 12:08 PM
To: David Newsom; 'Brian Jarman'
Cc: Johnson, Kelly; Scott, Georgette
Subject: RE: Onslow Memorial Hospital - SW8 950317
Importance: High
It appears that my preliminary calculations of overall percent density may not be correct. So, I need for you to double
check and revise your spreadsheet. In order to properly evaluate the BUA for this permit, it looks like you need to add
some things. Here are my questions:
1) Does your column 1 (Total Existing BUA) include Pre-1988 BUA?YES... I have no way of knowing what predates
'88.
2) Does your column 2 (HD pocket) include Pre-1988 BUA? I have no way of knowing (those numbers come directly
from the
Aug 3, 2006 Mod which was prepared and permitted by others (Mulkey and Paul Bartlett)
3) Does your column 1 include the additional 3,660 sf BUA from the HD pocket for this permit? Also, is this
included in your column 2? No..not yet ... I excluded that for now.... Regarding Column 2... again no .... the proposed
BUA we are now requesting NOT included.
4) It appears that you have not included the 41,000 sf future BUA in the Jacksonville permit. You should include
this as BUA since it has already been permitted. Shouldn't it go in your column 3 (Jax permit)? If permitted as
FUTURE... yes, we probably should include.
5) Your overall density calculation should exclude all pre-88 BUA and the DA associated with it. Also, you may want
to exclude the Jacksonville permit from your project area. I agree ... but it is impossible for me to know what
predates'88.
Please revise and resubmit by tomorrow (Sorry, probably not going to happen, 1 am also involved in another Permitting
Fiasco (Wellington/Carolina Forest Entrance Road) that is pretty much occupying ALL MY TIME at this point.. Let me
know if you need more time or have any questions.
Thanks,
Steve
From: David Newsom[mailto:crvstalcoasteng@)bizec.rr.com]
Sent: Thursday, February 16, 2012 1:54 PM
To: Pusey, Steven; 'Brian Jarman'
Cc: Johnson, Kelly
Subject: RE: Onslow Memorial Hospital - SW8 950317
Here are my numbers .... as they stand at this juncture....

Y.asi 4�r [A.RK.a I. r. _. .. ...ei •.-. -. ... 4. a Y �_ .. ._.� _.V.: Y, c� u..v u. l--'. ••-r .. Ri_ _ � hc"n.. .
' • .mot. '`.'1 /t ..��
P
0

Column 1 "Total Existing BUA" is my measurement of ALL BUA that exist on the site, based on the AsBuilt Survey that
John Pierces office has provided.
My responses to your below questions are below in red:
From: Pusey, Steven [mailto:steven.Du5gy(alncdenr.00vl
Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2012 10:46 AM
To: David Newsom; 'Brian Jarman'
Cc: Johnson, Kelly
Subject: RE: Onslow Memorial Hospital - SWB 950317
David,
I talked with John Pierce last week about the possibility of expediting this permit. I still need to discuss this with
Georgette Scott who is out sick today. So, just keep working on the BUA calculations for now. We will accept it as long
as it is logical and it sounds like your methodology is on track. Please email me a copy of your calculations as soon as
possible and I will review it and get back with you. We will extend the due date for another week to Feb. 22.
About the 95/96 permit for the Urgent Care facility, this impervious area was permitted as 28,610 sf in a low density
permit dated May 28, 1996 but never built. However, there is another building and parking lot in that general location,
the "Imaging Center for Women", a one-story brick medical office (reference plans by Mulkey Engineers, approved
August'06). This area was counted as impervious in the'06 permit for ER & Surgical Services Pavilion by Mulkey
Engineers. Note that the Mental Health Center was not included in the drainage area of this permit but it may be
considered offite. It is my understanding that the Mental Health Center, although technically part of the Onslow
Memorial tract, is a separate lease, and therefore probably NOT APPROPRIATE to account for it under the Hospital SW
permit. It is my understanding the BUA in that facility pre -dates the Stormwater Rules .... and therefore no SW permit
exists (at least does not exist to my knowledge).
I have combined all the numbers I can find into the spreadsheet attached. These number match the numbers I
submitted in my previous Add Info request letter. Hopefully, we can use this spreadsheet to validate the numbers.
Basically, I need to know two (2) things:
1. Where is the offsite area in the 2006 permit (5,378 so? Is this the Mental Health Center? I have no way of
knowing ..... as 1 believe Mulkey computed/provided those BUA figures.... Do you have a contact for someone at
Mulkey who we can perhaps contact in an effort to answer this question?
2. How does the pre-88 BUA add up to 114,998 sf? Again, I have noway of knowing.....
These items would be best explained in a drawing. If these numbers are incorrect, it would be best to correct them now.
One additional note: the site area in acres appears to have gone from 54.88 in 2006 to 44.72 in 2012. Reasons for this?
Again, I have no idea ... I can't imagine how it could be that large (54,88). GIS shows the total tract area as 47.98.... which
includes the leased area (3.27 ac) to the Mental Health Center. I believe the correct area, for SW permitting purposes,
would be the difference (47.98 Ac — 3.27 Ac = 44.72 Ac).
Please review this info and give me a call tomorrow... so we can figure where we go from here.
Let me know if you have any questions.
Regards,
Steve Pusey

0
9
0
,
0

From: David Newsom fmailto:crvstalcoasteno(a)bizec.rr.com]
Sent: Saturday, February 11, 2012 1:54 PM
To: Pusey, Steven; 'Brian Jarman'
Subject: RE: Onslow Memorial Hospital - SW8 950317
Steve
Despite working on this for days (and weekends), rest assured I will NOT be ready to resubmit by Feb. 15t"....
The is a REAL MESS with all these overlapping permits .... It is difficult, if not impossible, to reconcile all these permits (at
least I don't know how to do it) .... too many different Engineers/permit preparers involved and no way to confirm the
BUA numbers in the various permits.
The only way I know to resolve this mess is to measure ALL EXISTING BUA on site, including the 2 pockets of high
density. Then deduct the BUA in the individual pockets from that total to determine the percentage BUA in the
remaining Low Density area.
I ask that you consider and approve that methodology before I spend any more time. Regardless, I will need more time,
Brian
I need your parking improvements plan .... I need to understand where the add BUA and the deduct BUA come
from .... and I need the drainage area boundary for the ER and Surgical Services Pavilion.
Also, I need a boundary that matches that shown on GIS..... biggest difference is the Onslow County Mental Health
Center ... which show up on the GIS as being on -site, yet our boundary excludes it. Is it IN ... or OUT .... If in, we need to
determine whether there is a separate permit for it .... if not, we need to somehow determine the BUA associated with it.
Also, I need to confirm my understanding that little or no BUA associated with the 1995/1996 permit activity for the
Urgent Care Facility was constructed... That permit required a pond ..... I am aware of no such pond, so I presume that
project was never constructed .... If not, it may be easier to simply VOID that particular permit medication as opposed to
trying to reconcile it in the BUA numbers.
From: Pusey, Steven fmailto:steven.Dusev(@ncdenr.gov]
Sent: Monday, January 23, 2012 4:06 PM
To: David Newsom; Brian Jarman
Subject: RE: Onslow Memorial Hospital - SW8 950317
Importance: High
We will extend the due date by 3 weeks as requested. Therefore, the revised due date will be February 15, 2012.
Regards,
Steve Pusey
DWQ
From: David Newsom [mailto:crystalcoastena(a)bizec rr com]
Sent: Saturday, January 14, 2012 10:09 AM

, , 1 7 C. .1

To: Pusey, Steven
Subject: RE: Onslow Memorial Hospital - SW8 950317
Will have to wait 3 weeks .... I am out of country on business .... I will need an extension, in order to adequately address
your comments.
Thanks
From: Pusey, Steven[mailto:steven.ousey(a)ncdenr.aov]
Sent: Friday, January 13, 2012 5:33 PM
To: David Newsom; 'Pascal Pandosy'
Subject: RE: Onslow Memorial Hospital - SW8 950317
Sorry I wasn't able to meet you today. I was out all day on inspections. I will be glad to discuss it with you next week.
Steve
From: David Newsom fmailto:crystalcoasteno(a)bizec.rr.com1
Sent: Friday, January 13, 2012 10:15 AM
To: 'David Newsom'; Pusey, Steven; 'Pascal Pandosy
Subject: RE: Onslow Memorial Hospital - SW8 950317
Steve...
While I am there today ... can I look at your Onslow Mem file .... and see if there are any old Drainage Area Info or BUA
summaries from those old permits that might be of help to us.
Thanks
From: David Newsom[mailto:crystalcoasteng(a)bizec.rr.com]
Sent: Friday, January 13, 2012 9:50 AM
To: 'Pusey, Steven'; 'Pascal Pandosy
Subject: RE: Onslow Memorial Hospital - SW8 950317
Steve
We are certainly going to ATTEMPT to address the below comment(s), however, I am DOUBTFUL that it is possible (at
least for me .... perhaps I'm just too stupid) to "reconcile" all these BUA figures as you request.
These previous permit applications were prepared and submitted by various Engineers, at differing times, under varying
permitting requirements, and the respective permits issued by various DWQ staff with often varying requirements.
In short, it is difficult, if not impossible, for one to measure and categorize BUA from the pre-existing development .... and
to have those figures "match" those prepared and permitted previously by others as listed in those old permits.
I am currently involved in another situation that is very similar (old Low Density Permits with various Engineers involved)
which is very similar. I have now been "reconciling" those numbers for over 3 weeks (including all the holidays except
Christmas Day itself), and I STILL can't reconcile the figures to exactly match those measured and permitted by others.
In fact, I have a meeting with DWQ today at 1:30 to discuss that project...... if you have a moment, perhaps you could join
us and we can discuss this project (Hospital) in a little more detail.

r
�! � :jf
[" fL: Ji �
�l
�'
.... .I
_
+� Lf�
T+
t
,�
_.
C.
�� i
� i _
fT' a
'y;
_
.�
i' 1� .
� �+
�
r
- _
n
�'� T
f �uf `a
_
.��P
..
nt '- i i �
'��
�_
•� _
�
r
r
..i h:
.�..
ui
;f r-
C..
_ U
�; __
l•}`. i
� J
�' �
y f J
`
�. `, 1
�
!': 1_
_l
��
C J
``
�r
�•
_y

From: Pusey, Steven[mailto:steven.ouseva)ncdenr.aovl
Sent: Thursday, January 05, 2012 4:11 PM
To: David Newsom; 'Pascal Pandosy'
Subject: Onslow Memorial Hospital - SW8 950317
Importance: High
David Newsom, PE
Crystal Coast Engineering
Dear Mr. Newsom:
The Wilmington Regional Office received and accepted a modified State Stormwater Management Permit Application
for Onslow Memorial Hospital on November 29, 2011. A preliminary in-depth review of that information has
determined that the application is not complete. The following information is needed to continue the stormwater
review:
1. Please report all data in square feet for both drainage areas land 2 in the table on the permit application page 4
(similar to the previous 2006 permit). For example, both the 2006 permit and the new permit application should
be stated as follows for drainage areas 1 & 2:
DAl
DA2
Buildings
91,476
82,851 sf
Streets
10,890
0
Parking
130,406
180,431 sf
Sidewalk
8,712
16,290 sf
Offsite
0
5,378 sf
Other
20,038
0
Existing Pre-1988
?
?
TOTAL
2. In reference to the above item, the total existing pre-1988 BUA for DA2 was shown as 114,998 sf in the 2006
application. We need this broken down into subcomponents for both the 2006 permit and the new permit for
both DAl and DA2. In other words, we need to know how the pre-1988 BUA adds up.
3. What does the offsite area in DA2 represent? The pond should be sized such that it can handle the entire DA2
plus the offsite. The previous drainage area map shows a portion of the helipad and a road outside the drainage
area line. Is this the offsite area? Please explain and show how all BUA, including pre-1988, is handled by the
pond. This may require new pond calculations.
4. Please remember that a change to one number may have a domino effect on other numbers. Please check all
plans, calculations and forms and make changes as needed.
Please note that this request for additional information is in response to a preliminary review. The requested
information should be received in this Office prior to January 20, 2012, or the application will be returned as incomplete.
The return of a project will necessitate resubmittal of all required items, including the application fee.
If you need additional time to submit the information, please mail, email or fax your request for a time extension to the
Division at the address and fax number at the bottom of this letter. The request must indicate the date by which you
expect to submit the required information. The Division is allowed 90 days from the receipt of a completed application
to issue the permit.
The construction of any impervious surfaces, other than a construction entrance under an approved Sedimentation
Erosion Control Plan, is a violation of NCGS 143-215.1 and is subject to enforcement action pursuant to NCGS 143-
215.6A.

ANN 0, 2 - Wl j-
wo, wry.
11. i"aw0n: M A a im " FAqvt r" n n I , A n, I I i 0 !T a 3, i,,L to, K, �s ., -, ., ... , _;_. ;C0
Imn -1 u .1 on v lee no, T - ;A '3'.) %,;., "­ ..
w1m,
Au,
cc .: W %w :C
YA 0.
-ir-, 'A'M C ON. A KN G :.in, h Wn 7 jim Q j
ad! Y, , :,to m On, - it q : W& ..
5, Az&.:
I r - a 1 C1, . I).. 'T
, .II.' , . i0"-71Lij
Uv qb - a '0 Q. W r
al suds, b, 901 Awahm 1's can k> k , 1 0 0 QY t%j
.I-. - - I,._ J, , ­. I . 'J V .. *!IV A:. K I. - - ­ I I .I q, .. -. �." , a!!if," ., A I'I ... ... 1,­
0 d -4; hi 40L W, NAMA mr, _, a " 1- :44; 1, Irt 11 r- ji, nl brr - r­1 , ^o­
.­
JIlly., o
;-lwvn01 'A Saw w 'Cow r 1 no" k vw ?0

Please reference the State assigned project number on all correspondence. Any original documents that need to be
revised have been sent to the engineer or agent. All original documents must be returned or new originals must be
provided. Copies are not acceptable. If you have any questions concerning this matter please feel free to call me at
[phone] or email me at the email address above.
Regards,
Steve
GDS/sgp: S:\WQS\Stormwater\Permits & Projects\1995\950317 HD\2012 01 addinfo 950317
cc: David Newsom, PE
Wilmington Regional Office Stormwater File
crf� 47. PM
Environmental Engineer
NCDENR - Div. of Water Quality
Surface Water Protection
Ph [phone] / Fax [phone]
`c7ss' Before printing this email, please consider your budget and the environment
E-mail correspondence to and from this address maybe subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and maybe disclosed to third parties.

r;��j.�!i�r[i :{ry. ;a,, ^. t,;:.: l.l�!, -. .':Ci: •:r.`: `.a �l�q
'�; 'C-f' e.'.i. 'y;;.:(�fra: _ �'..{: 1l _Q •;r;"i..,Y,� J'e ... '�( Ic; ��i� ,�I;'r.J7.,.�;}:...:)iSt; _l. •s ...5
1AaR ;fe(.: PA OnQuid 15:i.+t.t, ,01.

Pusey, Steven
From:
Pusey, Steven
Sent:
Friday, February 17, 2012 11:31 AM
To:
'David Newsom'
Cc:
'Brian Jarman'; Johnson, Kelly; Scott, Georgette
Subject:
RE: Onslow Memorial Hospital
Attachments:
950317 MOD 2 worksheet.xlsx
I had to add 37,344 sf of built -upon area into the low density drainage area to correct our numbers to match yours. I
assume this is due to differences in parking and building areas. However, I am calling it "Other Unknown" in this permit.
You will have to reconcile this amount in the next permit modification.
See worksheet attached.
Regards,
Steve Pusey
From: David Newsom [mailto:crvstalcoastenci a)bizec.rr.com]
Sent: Friday, February 17, 2012 9:40 AM
To: Pusey, Steven
Subject: RE: Onslow Memorial Hospital
Thanks.....
And we will continue to work on getting this permit straightenend out.
From: Pusey, Steven[mailto:[e-mail]
Sent: Friday, February 17, 2012 9:26 AM
To: David Newsom; 'Brian Jarman'
Cc: Johnson, Kelly
Subject: Onslow Memorial Hospital
David,
I just recalculated the percent density for the overall low density permit requirements, including all pre-1988 drainage
area, as stated in my previous email. The new calculation is as follows:
Your calculated as -built BUA is 413,864 sf or 9.5 ac.
Your site area for calculating % density should be 47.98 (total site area) —13.64 (DA in 2006 mod HD pocket) — 3.97 (DA
in Jax permit) + 2.64 (pre-1988 DA in HD pocket) = 33.01 acres.
Therefore, BUA / Site Area = 9.5 / 33.01= 0.288 = 28.8%
This meets the requirements for overall low density limit with as -built BUA.
So, I will proceed with the permit.
Steve

I- I
I

ti
cft.� Q. V"&A .
Environmental Engineer
NCDENR - Div. of Water Quality
Surface Water Protection
Ph [phone] / Fax [phone]
` aWj Before printing this email, please consider your budget and the environment
E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.

d�
NC®ENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Beverly Eaves Perdue
Governor
January 5, 2012
Mr. Daniel T. Waller
Onslow Memorial Hospital
f ­241 New River Drive
Jacksonville, NC 28540
Division of Water Quality
Charles Wakild, P. E.
Director
Subject: Request for Additional Information
Stormwater Project No. SW8 950317 Mod 2
ER & Surgical Services Pavilion
Onslow County
Dear Mr. Waller:
The Wilmington Regional Office received and accepted a modified State Stormwater
Management Permit Application for Onslow Memorial Hospital on November 29, 2011. A
preliminary in-depth review of that information has determined that the application is not
complete. The following information is needed to continue the stormwater review:
Dee Freeman
Secretary
Please report all data in square feet for both drainage areas 1 and 2 in the table on the
permit application page 4 (similar to the previous 2006 permit). For example, both the
2006 permit and the new permit application should be stated as follows for drainage
areas 1 & 2:
DA1
DA2
Buildings
91,476
82,851 sf
Streets
10,890
0
Parking
130,406
180,431 sf
Sidewalk
8,712
16,290 sf
Offsite
0
5,378 sf
Other
20,038
0
Existing Pre-1988
?
?
TOTAL
-------------
?
--------------
?
In reference to the above item, the total existing pre-1988 BUA for DA2 was shown as
114,998 sf in the 2006 application. We need this broken down into subcomponents for
both the 2006 permit and the new permit for both DA1 and DA2. In other words, we need
to know how the pre-1988 BUA adds up for both drainage areas
3. What does the offsite area in DA2 represent? The pond should be, sized such that it can
handle the entire DA2 plus the offsite. The previous drainage area map shows a portion
of the helipad and a road outside the drainage area line. Is this the offsite area? Please
explain and show how all BUA, including pre-1988, is handled by the pond. This may
require new pond calculations.
4. Please remember that a change to one number may have a domino effect on other
numbers. Please check all plans, calculations and forms and make changes as needed
Wilmington Regional Office
127 Cardinal Drive Extension, Wilmington, North Carolina 28405 One
Phone: [phone] FAX [phone] DENR Assistance: 1-877-623-6748 North Carolina
Internet' w nmaterquality.org Va F'/Nn ly
(/ V K`{3 s !i(`

Please note that this request for additional information is in response to a preliminary review.
The requested information should be received in this Office prior to January 20, 2012, or the
application will be returned as incomplete. The return of a project will necessitate resubmittal of
all required items, including the application fee.
If you need additional time to submit the information, please mail, email or fax your request for a
time extension to the Division at the address and fax number at the bottom of this letter. The
request must indicate the date by which you expect to submit the required information. The
Division is allowed 90 days from the receipt of a completed application to issue the permit.
The construction of any impervious surfaces, other than a construction entrance under an
approved Sedimentation Erosion Control Plan, is a violation of NCGS 143-215.1 and is subject
to enforcement action pursuant to NCGS 143-215.6A.
Please reference the State assigned project number on all correspondence. Any original
documents that need to be revised have been sent to the engineer or agent. All original
documents must be returned or new originals must be provided. Copies are not acceptable. If
you have any questions concerning this matter please feel free to call me at [phone] or
email me at the email address above.
Regards,
Steven G. Pusey
Environmental Engineer
NCDENR - Div. of Water Quality
Surface Water Protection
Ph [phone] / Fax [phone]
GDS/sgp. S:\WQS\Stormwater\Permits & Projects\1995\950317 HD\2012 01 addinfo 950317
cc: David Newsom, PE
Wilmington Regional Office Stormwater File
Pave 2 of 2

Pusey, Steven
From:
Pusey, Steven I
Sent:
Thursday, February 16, 2012 5:02 PM
To:
'David Newsom'; 'Brian Jarman'
Cc:
Johnson, Kelly
Subject:
RE: Onslow Memorial Hospital - SW8 950317
David,
I believe you need to subtract out the drainage areas for the high density pockets from the overall site area in your
calculation. Therefore, your site area for calculating the % density would be 44.72 ac. — 13.64 ac. (2006 mod) — 3.97
ac.(Jax permit) = 27.11 ac. So, your overall %density would be 9.5 ac / 27.11 ac = 35%. Or, if you use the previous 54.88
ac. overall site area, it would be 9.5 / 37.27 = 25.5%. Finally, if you use the actual recorded tract area of 47.98 ac., you
would have 9.5 / 30.37 = 31.3%. 1 prefer the latter because we are including all drainage area for pre-88 BUA; this would
include the Mental Health Center. The only thing we are subtracting is the high density pockets (both BUA and drainage
area).
Let me know if you get the same numbers and agree with my math on calculating overall density.
Thanks
Steve
From: David Newsom [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Thursday, February 16, 2012 1:54 PM
To: Pusey, Steven; 'Brian Jarman'
Cc: Johnson, Kelly
Subject: RE: Onslow Memorial Hospital - SW8 950317
Here are my numbers....as they stand at this juncture....
Column 1 'Total Existing BUA" is my measurement of ALL BUA that exist on the site, based on the AsBuilt Survey that
John Pierces office has provided.
My responses to your below questions are below in red:
From: Pusey, Steven [mailto:steven.ousey ncdenr.aovl
Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2012 10:46 AM
To: David Newsom; 'Brian Jarman'
Cc: Johnson, Kelly
Subject: RE: Onslow Memorial Hospital - SW8 950317
David,
I talked with John Pierce last week about the possibility of expediting this permit. I still need to discuss this with
Georgette Scott who is out sick today. So, just keep working on the BUA calculations for now. We will accept it as long
as it is logical and it sounds like your methodology is on track. Please email me a copy of your calculations as soon as
possible and I will review it and get back with you. We will extend the due date for another week to Feb. 22.

inniver. too:
V
^O:)?'',: 03Nq V MC:: tutor - ',�.` -t J•� n• .` _•d'•l :.11

Pusey, Steven
From:
David Newsom ([e-mail]]
Sent:
Thursday, February 16, 2012 1:54 PM
To:
Pusey, Steven; 'Brian Jarman'
Cc:
Johnson, Kelly
Subject:
RE: Onslow Memorial Hospital - SW8 950317
Attachments:
BUA Summary.xlsx
Here are my numbers .... as they stand at this juncture....
Column 1 "Total Existing BUA" is my measurement of ALL BUA that exist on the site, based on the ASBuilt Survey that
John Pierces office has provided.
My responses to your below questions are below in red:
From: Pusey, Steven [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2012 10:46 AM
To: David Newsom; 'Brian Jarman'
Cc: Johnson, Kelly
Subject: RE: Onslow Memorial Hospital - SW8 950317
David,
I talked with John Pierce last week about the possibility of expediting this permit. I still need to discuss this with
Georgette Scott who is out sick today. So, just keep working on the BUA calculations for now. We will accept it as long
as it is logical and it sounds like your methodology is on track. Please email me a copy of your calculations as soon as
possible and I will review it and get back with you. We will extend the due date for another week to Feb. 22.
About the 95/96 permit for the Urgent Care facility, this impervious area was permitted as 28,610 sf in a low density
permit dated May 28, 1996 but never built. However, there is another building and parking lot in that general location,
the "Imaging Center for Women", a one-story brick medical office (reference plans by Mulkey Engineers, approved
August'06). This area was counted as impervious in the'06 permit for ER & Surgical Services Pavilion by Mulkey
Engineers. Note that the Mental Health Center was not included in the drainage area of this permit but it may be
considered offite. It is my understanding that the Mental Health Center, although technically part of the Onslow
Memorial tract, is a separate lease, and therefore probably NOT APPROPRIATE to account for it under the Hospital SW
permit. It is my understanding the BUA in that facility pre -dates the Stormwater Rules .... and therefore no SW permit
exists (at least does not exist to my knowledge). /^ b^ [ jet pre _ 1 4 00Q
I have combined all the numbers I can find into the spreadsheet attached. These number match the numbers I
submitted in my previous Add Info request letter. Hopefully, we can use this spreadsheet to validate the numbers.
Basically, I need to know two (2) things:
1. Where is the offsite area in the 2006 permit (5,378 sf)? Is this the Mental Health Center? I have no way of
knowing ..... as I believe Mulkey computed/provided those BUA figures.... Do you have a contact for someone at
Mulkey who we can perhaps contact in an effort to answer this question? �� /dam J—PG^
2. How does the pre-88 BUA add up to 114,998 sf? Again, I have noway of knowing.....
QK ,i �1 Fo•� Dnrrev,
These items would be best explained in a drawing. If these numbers are incorrect, it would be best to correct them now!
A404M
Newj_%
1 ( 4e .

One additional note: the site area in acres appears to have gone from 54.88 in 2006 to 44.72 in 2012. Reasons for this?
Again, I have no idea ... I can't imagine how it could be that large (54,88). GIS shows the total tract area as 47.98....which
includes the leased area (3.27 ac) to the Mental Health Center. I believe the correct area, for SW permitting purposes,
would be the difference (47.98 Ac — 3.27 Ac = 44.72 Ac). 0 /'
Please review this info and give me a call tomorrow ... so we can figure where we go from here.
Let me know if you have any questions.
Regards,
Steve Pusey
From: David Newsom [mailto:crystalcoasteng(a)bizec.rr.coml
Sent: Saturday, February 11, 2012 1:54 PM
To: Pusey, Steven; 'Brian Jarman'
Subject: RE: Onslow Memorial Hospital - SW8 950317
Steve
Despite working on this for days (and weekends), rest assured I will NOT be ready to resubmit by Feb. 15`n
The is a REAL MESS with all these overlapping permits .... It is difficult, if not impossible, to reconcile all these permits (at
least I don't know how to do it) .... too many different Engineers/permit preparers involved and no way to confirm the
BUA numbers in the various permits.
The only way I know to resolve this mess is to measure ALL EXISTING BUA on site, including the 2 pockets of high
density. Then deduct the BUA in the individual pockets from that total to determine the percentage BUA in the
remaining Low Density area.
I ask that you consider and approve that methodology before I spend any more time. Regardless, I will need more time,
Brian
I need your parking improvements plan .... I need to understand where the add BUA and the deduct BUA come
from .... and I need the drainage area boundary for the ER and Surgical Services Pavilion.
Also, I need a boundary that matches that shown on GIS..... biggest difference is the Onslow County Mental Health
Center ... which show up on the GIS as being on -site, yet our boundary excludes it. Is it IN ... or OUT .... If in, we need to
determine whether there is a separate permit for it .... if not, we need to somehow determine the BUA associated with it.
Also, I need to confirm my understanding that little or no BUA associated with the 1995/1996 permit activity for the
Urgent Care Facility was constructed... That permit required a pond ..... I am aware of no such pond, so I presume that
project was never constructed .... If not, it may be easier to simply VOID that particular permit medication as opposed to
trying to reconcile it in the BUA numbers.
From: Pusey, Steven [mailto:steven.puseyCalncdenr.gov]
Sent: Monday, January 23, 2012 4:06 PM

To: David Newsom; Brian Jarman
Subject: RE: Onslow Memorial Hospital - SW8 950317
Importance: High
We will extend the due date by 3 weeks as requested. Therefore, the revised due date will be February 15, 2012.
Regards,
Steve Pusey
DWQ
From: David Newsom [mailto:crystalcoastengCalbizec.rr.coml
Sent: Saturday, January 14, 2012 10:09 AM
To: Pusey, Steven
Subject: RE: Onslow Memorial Hospital - SW8 950317 -
Will have to wait 3 weeks .... I am out of country on business .... I will need an extension, in order to adequately address
your comments.
Thanks
From: Pusey, Steven [mailto:steven.pusey(a)ncdenr.gov]
Sent: Friday, January 13, 2012 5:33 PM
To: David Newsom; 'Pascal Pandosy'
Subject: RE: Onslow Memorial Hospital - SW8 950317
Sorry I wasn't able to meet you today. I was out all day on inspections. I will be glad to discuss it with you next week.
Steve
From: David Newsom [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Friday, January 13, 2012 10:15 AM
To: 'David Newsom'; Pusey, Steven; 'Pascal Pandosy'
Subject: RE: Onslow Memorial Hospital - SW8 950317
Steve...
While I am there today ... can I look at your Onslow Mem file .... and see if there are any old Drainage Area Info or BUA
summaries from those old permits that might be of help to us.
Thanks
From: David Newsom [mailto:crystalcoasteng(cbbizec.rr.com]
Sent: Friday, January 13, 2012 9:50 AM
To: 'Pusey, Steven'; 'Pascal Pandosy'
Subject: RE: Onslow Memorial Hospital - SW8 950317
Steve
We are certainly going to ATTEMPT to address the below comment(s), however, I am DOUBTFUL that it is possible (at
least for me .... perhaps I'm just too stupid) to "reconcile" all these BUA figures as you request.

These previous permit applications were prepared and submitted by various Engineers, at differing times, under varying
permitting requirements, and the respective permits issued by various DWQ staff with often varying requirements.
In short, it is difficult, if not impossible, for one to measure and categorize BUA from the pre-existing development .... and
to have those figures "match" those prepared and permitted previously by others as listed in those old permits.
I am currently involved in another situation that is very similar (old Low Density Permits with various Engineers involved)
which is very similar. I have now been "reconciling" those numbers for over 3 weeks (including all the holidays except
Christmas Day itself), and I STILL can't reconcile the figures to exactly match those measured and permitted by others.
In fact, I have a meeting with DWQ today at 1:30 to discuss that project...... if you have a moment, perhaps you could join
us and we can discuss this project (Hospital) in a little more detail.
From: Pusey, Steven[mailto:steven.ouseyCalncdenr.gov]
Sent: Thursday, January 05, 2012 4:11 PM
To: David Newsom; 'Pascal Pandosy'
Subject: Onslow Memorial Hospital - SW8 950317
Importance: High
David Newsom, PE
Crystal Coast Engineering
Dear Mr. Newsom:
The Wilmington Regional Office received and accepted a modified State Stormwater Management Permit Application
for Onslow Memorial Hospital on November 29, 2011. A preliminary in-depth review of that information has
determined that the application is not complete. The following information is needed to continue the stormwater
review:
1. Please report all data in square feet for both drainage areas 1 and 2 in the table on the permit application page 4
(similar to the previous 2006 permit). For example, both the 2006 permit and the new permit application should
be stated as follows for drainage areas 1 & 2:
DA1
DA2
Buildings
91,476
82,851 sf
Streets
10,890
0
Parking
130,406
180,431 sf
Sidewalk
8,712
16,290 sf
Offsite
0
5,378 sf
Other
20,038
0
Existing Pre-1988
?
?
TOTAL
2. In reference to the above item, the total existing pre-1988 BUA for DA2 was shown as 114,998 sf in the 2006
application. We need this broken down into subcomponents for both the 2006 permit and the new permit for
both DA1 and DA2. In other words, we need to know how the pre-1988 BUA adds up.
3. What does the offsite area in DA2 represent? The pond should be sized such that it can handle the entire DA2
plus the offsite. The previous drainage area map shows a portion of the helipad and a road outside the drainage
area line. Is this the offsite area? Please explain and show how all BUA, including pre-1988, is handled by the
pond. This may require new pond calculations.
4. Please remember that a change to one number may have a domino effect on other numbers. Please check all
plans, calculations and forms and make changes as needed.

Please note that this request for additional information is in response to a preliminary review. The requested
information should be received in this Office prior to January 20, 2012, or the application will be returned as incomplete.
The return of a project will necessitate resubmittal of all required items, including the application fee.
If you need additional time to submit the information, please mail, email or fax your request for a time extension to the
Division at the address and fax number at the bottom of this letter. The request must indicate the date by which you
expect to submit the required information. The Division is allowed 90 days from the receipt of a completed application
to issue the permit.
The construction of any impervious surfaces, other than a construction entrance under an approved Sedimentation
Erosion Control Plan, is a violation of NCGS 143-215.1 and is subject to enforcement action pursuant to NCGS 143-
215.6A.
Please reference the State assigned project number on all correspondence. Any original documents that need to be
revised have been sent to the engineer or agent. All original documents must be returned or new originals must be
provided. Copies are not acceptable. If you have any questions concerning this matter please feel free to call me at
[phone] or email me at the email address above.
Regards,
Steve
GDS/sgp: S:\WQS\Stormwater\Permits & Projects\1995\950317 HD\2012 01 addinfo 950317
cc: David Newsom, PE
Wilmington Regional Office Stormwater File
ciicvcrc 4G. P
Environmental Engineer
NCDENR - Div. of Water Quality
Surface Water Protection
Ph [phone] / Fax [phone]
`W Before printing this email, please consider your budget and the environment.
E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.

Pusey, Steven
From:
Betty Bullock [BettyBullock ?jlpnc.com]
Sent:
Thursday, February 16, 2012 12:41 PM
To:
Pusey, Steven
Subject:
FW: 215 Memorial Drive - Mental Health
John asked I forward this information to you.
Betty
Betty Bullock, Office Manager
John L. Pierce & Associates, P.A.
P.O. Box 1685
405Johnson Blvd. (28540)
Jacksonville, NC28541
[phone] Fax [phone]
The mental health facility was built in 1977. The address is 215 Memorial Drive.
Sincerely,
Connie Kellum
Engineering Secretary
215 Station Street
Jacksonville, NC 28546
910-577-2410
connie. kel [e-mail]
2 -16 - 17 . I/Pr,A'e-4 -fl'
Sl 1 AIr OnllOW lQr 4e4/ �e�/�•1 C Or.1511 r.
w ass ba, / � ,l-la,,f,n,, ? Sere; cc SJ.
1,377
2 / $
Aforr°fret %><ouse ©pe w<rons
R4: 910-2rp-8000
1

G
a
-
4
�
J
�
k
_
-
� 1
'
-
a
t
m

Pusey, Steven
From: Pusey, Steven
Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2012 10:46 AM
To: 'David Newsom'; 'Brian Jarman'
Cc: Johnson, Kelly
Subject: RE: Onslow Memorial Hospital - SWB 950317
Attachments: 950317 MOD 2 worksheet.xlsx
David,
I talked with John Pierce last week about the possibility of expediting this permit. I still need to discuss this with
Georgette Scott who is out sick today. So, just keep working on the BUA calculations for now. We will accept it as long
as it is logical and it sounds like your methodology is on track. Please email me a copy of your calculations as soon as
possible and I will review it and get back with you. We will extend the due date for another week to Feb. 22.
About the 95/96 permit for the Urgent Care facility, this impervious area was permitted as 28,610 sf in a low density
permit dated May 28, 1996 but never built. However, there is another building and parking lot in that general location,
the "Imaging Center for Women", a one-story brick medical office (reference plans by Mulkey Engineers, approved
August'06). This area was counted as impervious in the'06 permit for ER & Surgical Services Pavilion by Mulkey
Engineers. Note that the Mental Health Center was not included in the drainage area of this permit but it may be
considered offite.
I have combined all the numbers I can find into the spreadsheet attached. These number match the numbers I
submitted in my previous Add Info request letter. Hopefully, we can use this spreadsheet to validate the numbers.
Basically, I need to know two (2) things:
1. Where is the offsite area in the 2006 permit (5,378 sf)? Is this the Mental Health Center?
2. How does the pre-88 BUA add up to 114,998 sf?
These items would be best explained in a drawing. If these numbers are incorrect, it would be best to correct them now.
One additional note: the site area in acres appears to have gone from 54.88 in 2006 to 44.72 in 2012. Reasons for this?
Let me know if you have any questions.
Regards,
Steve Pusey
From: David Newsom [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Saturday, February 11, 2012 1:54 PM
To: Pusey, Steven; 'Brian Jarman'
Subject: RE: Onslow Memorial Hospital - SWEI 950317
Steve
Despite working on this for days (and weekends), rest assured I will NOT be ready to resubmit by Feb. 151h....
The is a REAL MESS with all these overlapping permits .... It is difficult, if not impossible, to reconcile all these permits (at
least I don't know how to do it) .... too many different Engineers/permit preparers involved and no way to confirm the
BUA numbers in the various permits.

4
.. ..:4 � _... _.-.. ... .. .. ..ram.. .� r..• a... _
a

The only way I know to resolve this mess is to measure ALL EXISTING BUA on site, including the 2 pockets of high
density. Then deduct the BUA in the individual pockets from that total to determine the percentage BUA in the
remaining Low Density area.
I ask that you consider and approve that methodology before I spend any more time. Regardless, I will need more time,
Brian
I need your parking improvements plan .... I need to understand where the add BUA and the deduct BUA come
from .... and I need the drainage area boundary for the ER and Surgical Services Pavilion.
Also, I need a boundary that matches that shown on GIS..... biggest difference is the Onslow County Mental Health
Center ... which show up on the GIS as being on -site, yet our boundary excludes it. Is it IN ... or OUT .... If in, we need to
determine whether there is a separate permit for it .... if not, we need to somehow determine the BUA associated with it.
Also, I need to confirm my understanding that little or no BUA associated with the 1995/1996 permit activity for the
Urgent Care Facility was constructed... That permit required a pond ..... I am aware of no such pond, so I presume that
project was never constructed .... If not, it may be easier to simply VOID that particular permit medication as opposed to
trying to reconcile it in the BUA numbers.
From: Pusey, Stevenfmailto:steven.ousey(ancdenr.aov]
Sent: Monday, January 23, 2012 4:06 PM
To: David Newsom; Brian Jarman
Subject: RE: Onslow Memorial Hospital - SW8 950317
Importance: High
We will extend the due date by 3 weeks as requested. Therefore, the revised due date will be February 15, 2012.
Regards,
Steve Pusey
DWQ
From: David Newsom[mailto:crystalcoasteno(a)bizec.rr.com]
Sent: Saturday, January 14, 2012 10:09 AM
To: Pusey, Steven
Subject: RE: Onslow Memorial Hospital - SW8 950317
Will have to wait 3 weeks .... I am out of country on business .... I will need an extension, in order to adequately address
your comments.
Thanks
From: Pusey, Steven [mailto•steven ousev@)ncdenr ci
Sent: Friday, January 13, 2012 5:33 PM
To: David Newsom; 'Pascal Pandosy
Subject: RE: Onslow Memorial Hospital - SW8 950317
Sorry I wasn't able to meet you today. I was out all day on inspections. I will be glad to discuss it with you next week.

I

Steve
From: David Newsom [mailto:crystalcoastengCa)bizec.rr.com]
Sent: Friday, January 13, 2012 10:15 AM
To: 'David Newsom'; Pusey, Steven; 'Pascal Pandosy'
Subject: RE: Onslow Memorial Hospital - SW8 950317
Steve...
While I am there today... can I look at your Onslow Mem file .... and see if there are any old Drainage Area Info or BUA
summaries from those old permits that might be of help to us.
Thanks
From: David Newsom fmailto:crystalcoastena(ulbizec.rr.coml
Sent: Friday, January 13, 2012 9:50 AM
To: 'Pusey, Steven'; 'Pascal Pandosy'
Subject: RE: Onslow Memorial Hospital - SW8 950317
Steve
We are certainly going to ATTEMPT to address the below comment(s), however, I am DOUBTFUL that it is possible (at
least for me .... perhaps I'm just too stupid) to "reconcile" all these BUA figures as you request.
These previous permit applications were prepared and submitted by various Engineers, at differing times, under varying
permitting requirements, and the respective permits issued by various DWQ staff with often varying requirements.
In short, it is difficult, if not impossible, for one to measure and categorize BUA from the pre-existing development....and
to have those figures "match" those prepared and permitted previously by others as listed in those old permits.
I am currently involved in another situation that is very similar (old Low Density Permits with various Engineers involved)
which is very similar. I have now been "reconciling" those numbers for over 3 weeks (including all the holidays except
Christmas Day itself), and I STILL can't reconcile the figures to exactly match those measured and permitted by others.
In fact, I have a meeting with DWQ today at 1:30 to discuss that project...... if you have a moment, perhaps you could join
us and we can discuss this project (Hospital) in a little more detail.
From: Pusey, Steven [mailto:steven.ousev(alncdenr.govl
Sent: Thursday, January 05, 2012 4:11 PM
To: David Newsom; 'Pascal Pandosy'
Subject: Onslow Memorial Hospital - SW8 950317
Importance: High
David Newsom, PE
Crystal Coast Engineering
Dear Mr. Newsom:
The Wilmington Regional Office received and accepted a modified State Stormwater Management Permit Application
for Onslow Memorial Hospital on November 29, 2011. A preliminary in-depth review of that information has
determined that the application is not complete. The following information is needed to continue the stormwater
review:

o7
... ...... .

1. Please report all data in square feet for both drainage areas land 2 in the table on the permit application page 4
(similar to the previous 20G6 permit). For example, both the 20G6 permit and the new permit application should
be stated as follows for drainage areas 1 & 2:
DAl
DA2
Buildings
91,476
82,851 sf
Streets
10,890
0
Parking
130,406
180,431 sf
Sidewalk
8,712
16,290 sf
Offsite
0
5,378 sf
Other
20,038
0
Existing Pre-1988
?
?
TOTAL
2. In reference to the above item, the total existing pre-1988 BUA for DA2 was shown as 114,998 sf in the 2006
application. We need this broken down into subcomponents for both the 2006 permit and the new permit for
both DAl and DA2. In other words, we need to know how the pre-1988 BUA adds up.
3. What does the offsite area in DA2 represent? The pond should be sized such that it can handle the entire DA2
plus the offsite. The previous drainage area map shows a portion of the helipad and a road outside the drainage
area line. Is this the offsite area? Please explain and show how all BUA, including pre-1988, is handled by the
pond. This may require new pond calculations.
4. Please remember that a change to one number may have a domino effect on other numbers. Please check all
plans, calculations and forms and make changes as needed.
Please note that this request for additional information is in response to a preliminary review. The requested
information should be received in this Office prior to January 20, 2012, or the application will be returned as incomplete.
The return of a project will necessitate resubmittal of all required items, including the application fee.
If you need additional time to submit the information, please mail, email or fax your request for a time extension to the
Division at the address and fax number at the bottom of this letter. The request must indicate the date by which you
expect to submit the required information. The Division is allowed 90 days from the receipt of a completed application
to issue the permit.
The construction of any impervious surfaces, other than a construction entrance under an approved Sedimentation
Erosion Control Plan, is a violation of NCGS 143-215.1 and is subject to enforcement action pursuant to NCGS 143-
215.6A.
Please reference the State assigned project number on all correspondence. Any original documents that need to be
revised have been sent to the engineer or agent. All original documents must be returned or new originals must be
provided. Copies are not acceptable. If you have any questions concerning this matter please feel free to call me at
[phone] or email me at the email address above.
Regards,
Steve
GDS/sgp: 5:\WO,S\Stormwater\Permits & Projects\1995\950317 HD\2012 01 addinfo 950317
cc: David Newsom, PE
Wilmington Regional Office Stormwater File
s>a� q. P
Environmental Engineer

Pusey, Steven
From: Betty Bullock [[e-mail]]
Sent: Friday, February 10, 2012 12:30 PM
To: Pusey, Steven
Subject: Onslow Memorial Hospital - Parking Addition
Mr. Pusey:
On November 23, 2011, we submitted an application for a stormwater pond modification' for Onlsow Memorial
Hospital SW8 950317. We would appreciate it if you could process this application as quickly as possible. The
N.C. Department of Transportation has taken over a portion of the parking area for the new roadway and the
hospital is in distress for parking. We are in the process of preparing a complete As -Built survey of the hospital
property along with drainage data (BUA) and will forward to you when complete. The hospital intends on
adding an additional + 80 parking spaces and access road on the hospital grounds. We hope to have the plans
complete and submitted to you within the next 3 months. We would appreciate any help you could give us on
the existing permit submittal.
John L. Pierce
Betty Bullock, Office Manager
John L. Pierce & Associates, P.A.
P.O. Box 1685
405Johnson Blvd. (28540)
Jacksonville, NC28541
[phone] Fox [phone]

,
.��. .t:�... �.. it. I:wW i:v«n i.. ...�.1. ..... Yr .. .. .,n ..: Lam. a.�:S'/.n[...... .... �..ia. .. .. �• �. .ti. ♦ ..lP..�..:`Y.'.Y.f..: n.�v .�..vr.l+'.n. .Y.> 4
n won?
W.M.!t .at.J ,:: /'.:,'�1
... ''iba .Ili t: 1..
.h ia�l, t,
a y JI'.,. .t; li •%n
v 1 a, _
- ". ., ' l
ln� .rlv�rll lv 11
1 .�� t l+Ii.
,. -LI•I
l,il �,1 i � ��1
'�flfl 1.
j ' _� 11 v
r I
..Intl. .1 .J J. a
i Y:Y . l \ . Svp
1
04: { 1
r /
'I l t q �J'
_•.
^q:.hl•'.I,1!:.
..1. 1 Ox, .tl',on1r.
.:I .:,"
:,lTVl;r,.,..it:
.'
1, , .>r.',.
n''i.
!•fJ .i �I 'P:j.L.
L:.'d'� (i'a, '1L, ..>)�,; �: hill
.:i W�!r
9d Y.1' , l:J! ]
� 1Ll it
`<�. �":l �.. 1.`C'"u'
:�4C ,I:`;t•r, _
...,;'S,`l .' 116A
, his, .
i" A.I.

Pusey, Steven
From: Pusey, Steven
Sent: Thursday, January 05, 2012 4:11 PM
To: _'David Newsom'; 'Pascal Pandosy'
Subject: Onslow Memorial Hospital - SW8 950317
Importance: High
David Newsom, PE
Crystal Coast Engineering
Dear Mr. Newsom:
The Wilmington Regional Office received and accepted a modified State Stormwater Management Permit Application
for Onslow Memorial Hospital on November 29, 2011. A preliminary in-depth review of that information has
determined that the application is not complete. The following information is needed to continue the stormwater
review:
1. Please report all data in square feet for both drainage areas 1 and 2 in the table on the permit application page 4
(similar to the previous 2006 permit). For example, both the 2006 permit and the new permit application should
be stated as follows for drainage areas 1 & 2:
DAl
DA2
Buildings
91,476
82,851 sf
Streets
10,890
0
Parking
130,406
180,431 sf
Sidewalk
8,712
16,290sf
Offsite
0
5,378 sf
Other
20,038
0
Existing Pre-1988
?
?
1111.1/n11
�-H��D sk ctMc�re� rr
. 5 FAI
2. In reference to the above item, the total existing pre-1988 BUA for DA2 was shown as 114,998 sf in the 2006
application. We need this broken down into subcomponents for both the 2006 permit and the new permit for
both DA1 and DA2. In other words, we need to know how the pre-1988 BUA adds up.
3. What does the offsite area in DA2 represent? The pond should be sized such that it can handle the entire DA2
plus the offsite. The previous drainage area map shows a portion of the helipad and a road outside the drainage
area line. Is this the offsite area? Please explain and show how all BUA, including pre-1988, is handled by the
pond. This may require new pond calculations.
4. Please remember that a change to one number may have a domino effect on other numbers. Please check all
plans, calculations and forms and make changes as needed.
Please note that this request for additional information is in response to a preliminary review. The requested
information should be received in this Office prior to January 20, 2012, or the application will be returned as incomplete.
The return of a project will necessitate resubmittal of all required items, including the application fee.
If you need additional time to submit the information, please mail, email or fax your request for a time extension to the
Division at the address and fax number at the bottom of this letter. The request must indicate the date by which you
expect to submit the required information. The Division is allowed 90 days from the receipt of a completed application
to issue the permit.

'eThe construction of any impervious surfaces, other than a construction entrance under an approved Sedimentation
Erosion Control Plan, is a violation of NCGS 143-215.1 and is subject to enforcement action pursuant to NCGS 143-
215.6A.
Please reference the State assigned project number on all correspondence. Any original documents that need to be
revised have been sent to the engineer or agent. All original documents must be returned or new originals must be
provided. Copies are not acceptable. If you have any questions concerning this matter please feel free to call me at
[phone] or email me at the email address above.
Regards,
Steve
GDS/sgp: S:\WQS\Stormwater\Permits & Projects\1995\950317 HD\2012 01 addinfo 950317
cc: David Newsom, PE
Wilmington Regional Office Stormwater File
d'tave., 47. P..afty.
Environmental Engineer
NCDENR - Div. of Water Quality
Surface Water Protection
Ph [phone] / Fax [phone]
'*- ' Before printing this email, please consider your budget and the environment
E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.

t.
a
j

Completeness Review Checklist
Project Name: P17 Received Date: ,'(rrJdlll I
Project Location: r Ck Ymu,\\? 1� n A MoQ Accepted Date:
Rule(s) El2008 Coastal 11995 Coastal r❑Phase II (WiRO) Universal F-11988 Coastal
Type of Permit: New or Mod or PR Existing Permit # (Mod or PR): �SO'� s� nPE Cert on File?
Density: Yor AD) Type: Commercial or Residential ONCG:
%: (Yo OK?) Stream�as$,s: 5C, \3u+,Ns� MSA Map nOffsite to SW8
auoarviaeor: �,uoowision or singie Lot) 11 IORW Map I ) )Exempt
Paperwork ��_
7 b
---���� ��' oob 'To r�cV e�, 3�
/j5ypplement(s) (1 original per BMP) (e u-' IMP Type(s): Cn(QAL,_ L_p 'J/ �tA� IN% CPt s TWA-?
��O&M with correct/original signatures (1 original per BMP except LS/VFS and swales) C-4S-7Wh 3'n 9 C-F'11-1
l t� tc rZ
Application with correct/original signatures 110 Y-w
W 1p (_"An 6laU � T
rp or LLC: Sig. Auth. per SoS or letter
(within 6mo)
ils Report with SHWT
KCulations (signed/sealed)
nNo obvious errors
!nsity includes common areas, etc
Restrictions, if subdivided:
& Notarized
Note to Reviewer:
• 4ts gQouC'j Tionl J`f3+�5 In S !S
lt�iy\PC.£-Ie-0 V
n(O1C 5 or) m ItZz Si IX
His \tC7
Plans
Sets Details (roads, cul-de-sacs, curbs, sidewalks, BMPs, Buildings, etc)
Grading Wetlands: Delineated or No Wetlands
Vicinity Map Layout (proposed BUA dimensions)
Legend �DA Maps Project Boundaries
Infiltration
Wet Pod
Off
Soils Rep t
Soils R art
�PE Ce \for Master Lot #:
SHWT:SHWT:
Bottom:
Visited:
PP:
Deed Rest Master Lot # Matches Master
BUA Permitted (Mas sf
BUA Proposed (Offsite): sf
Additional Information:
Permitted Proposed: Proposed: Proposed:
BUA (sf)
DA (sf)
PP (el)
SHWT (el)
Depth (ft)
SA (sf)

I�sV�u( �o� �LI/c��iu�'
(3�\u oa-opj(v NoiL
C Q 060, 5\ Q
nc
z+:� I LL %l
ell L3rvlSvmZ nz L
()%(hge
_9\ I°)C)e
-cwp
Taa
Qe Q
r401LA) Dkrylb , 3UnI
lnN ;
i
CI LL'1o' I )1dn`d NZ
x\a3z-)N-F-j1
LY3d'L. °1-
Qoo�
oHocl Icy CJ'1
— V �l
C-1 bvl
v1ry, s35�w'J e
8AI °C.I �
U' �-Pcu
clNDL. yJv�1 sj-9 cvl-a�g °
bC,% L N\&� o
-�\°a10 \\(De
u I I-

JOHN L. PIERCE & ASSOCIATES, P.A.
LAND SURVEYING — LAND PLANNING —MAPPING
P.O. BOX 1685
JACKSONV ILLE, NC 28541
OFFICE: [phone] FAX: [phone]
E-MAIL: bettvbnilonacom
Or brianjnjl no c.com
TO: Ms. Kelly Johnson
N.C. Department of Environment and Natural
Resources — Department of Stormwater
127 Cardinal Drive Extension
Wilmineton, NC 28405
Letter of Transmittal
DATE:
November 23, 2011
ATTENTION:
Kelly Johnson
Re.
Onslow Memorial Hospital — Parking addition
COPIES DATE NUMBER DESCRIPTION
2 Sets of plans
2 Stormwater applications with calculations
1 Check in the amount of $505.00
2 Narrative
1 Copy of Deed of Record
I
SIGNED:ll>G�.

I
Boa 477 PACE 204
NORTH CAROLINA:
ONSLOW COUNTY:
AGREEMENT
THIS LEASE, made and entered into this 5th day of February, 1973,
by and between Onslow County, a body politic and corporate of the State of
North Carolina, hereinafter called the County, and Onslow County Hospital
Authority, a public body and a body corporate and politic under and ursuant
to Article 13, Chapter 131. of the General Statutes of North Carolina, having
its principal office in the City of Jacksonville, North Carolina, hereinafter
called the Authority;
WITNESSETH:
That whereas, the County is the owner of a tract of land situ a in the
Township of Jacksonville, OnslOW County, North Carolina, and iescribed as
follows:
BEGINNING at an iroi. stake in the western right of way lit,e of
Western Boulevard, State Road 1470 which stake is 1184. 88 feet
from the center line of Carolina Power and Light Company 100
-foot right of way when measured along Western Boulevard right
of way in anorthern 6.rect47n: ;.`.encc fre:a said BEGINNING
South 85 degrees 52 minutes West 250.0 feet to an iron stake;
thence South 4 degree- 08 minutes East 642.10 feet to an iron
stake in the center of ;t 30 foot drainage and utility easement;
thence following the center of the easement South 35 degrees 80
minutes West 174. 47 fF et to 4 point on top of a corrugated metal
pipe in the northern right of way of Oxford Road; thence following
said right of way North 53 degrees 02 minutes West 1350. 61 feet
to an iron stake; thence South 26 degrees 31 minutes West 20.34
feet to an iron stake in the northern right of way line of Carolina
Power and Light Company rig'nt of way; thence following said
right of way North 52 degrees 59 minutes West 610. 50 feet to
an iron stake in the Stiles and White property line; thence fol-
lowing the said line North 26 degrees 31 minutes East 412. 82
feet to'a Railroad iron, Arnold heirs corner; thence following
` the Arnold line North 17 degrees 50 minutes East 628. 80 feet
to an iron stake; thence South 65 degrees 08 minutes East
1207.01 feet to the point of curvature; said curve having a radius
of 411, 97 feet; thence with the curve in a nortneastern direction
Narc distance of 217. 14 feet to the potnL of tangency; thence
orth 84 degrees 40 minutes East 138. 83 feet to an iron stake in
the right of way curve of Western Boulevard; said curve having
a radius of 3111. 46 feet; thence in a southeastern direction with
the right of way an arc distance of 65. 0 feet to the point of
tangency; thence continuing with the right of way South 4 degrees
08 minutes East 735.0 feet to the point of BEGINNING; being a
small portion of the Weyerhaeuser Properties Inc. Land, Parcely0
8, recorded in Map Book 9, Page 49, and Parcel 3, recordedf
Map Book 10, Page 42, Onslow County Registry, st A`b
Subject to a 20 foot easement across the Western Boulevard

BOON 477 % 'PACE205
frontage used jointly by Jones-Onslow Electric Membership
Corporation; Brynn Marr Utility Company, utility easement;
Weyerhaeuser Properties, Inc. , drainage easement.
And whereas, the County has agreed to lease said land and hospital
facilities to the Authority, and the Authority has agreed to maintain and oper
said hospital facilities in order to provide hospital and clinic services to the
people of this County and the general public for the preservation of the public
health;
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and subject to
the terms and conditions hereinafter set forth, the County does hereby lease tc
the Authority for a term endind-September 30, 1983; the premises and hospital
facilities above described.
The terms and conditions of this agreement are as follows;
I. This lease shall commence upon the completion of construction of
the hospital facility presently under construction on the property hereinbefore
described and its acceptance by the North Carolina Medical Care Commission.
2. The Authority agrees to establish, maintain and operate said hos-
pital facilities for the preservation of Public Health and in order to provide
hospital and clinic services to the general public and in all respects to carry
out and per the objects for which .said hospital facility is being construct
3. The hospital facility shall be operated at all times and in every
respect administered as a charitable, non-profit facility; no part of the net
earnings of the Authority shall ever uiure to the benefit of any individual, firm
or corporation.
4. The Authority shall, by regulations, establish a reasonable but
adequate and uniform scale of fees and charges for the use of the facilities and
services of the hospital facility. All persons financially able to do so shall
pay full fees and charges or furnish acceptable security for same. Those
persons not financially able to pay full fees and charges but able to pay or
secure a part or portion of same shall be required to so do according to their
financial ability. Any profits derived from the operation of the hospital
facility shall be used exclusively for the purposes and objectives of the hos
facility, including expansion of facilities,
to be used for patients.
purchase of supplies and equipment

1
BOOT( 477 PACE 206
5. The Authority shall observe the rule of furnishing each person
admitted to the hospital with equal facilities and the same standard of service
and treatment, irrespective of race, color, descent or creed; but this rule
shall not prohibit the assignment of separate rooms, wards or sections for
certain types of diseases. No favoritism or discrim-ination shall be shown or
made because of any person's rank, profession, financial status, or station in
life.
6. The Authority agrees to maintain said hospital facilities and equip-
ment in good repair and modern condition.
7. The Authority agrees to adequatelyt
b.aff the hospital with sufficient
professional personnel or arrange with the members of the Hospital Medical
Staff to provide for a physican on call at all times to handle emergency cases
at the hospital.
8. Upon the commencement of the term of this lease and thereafter,
the Authority agrees to keep the hospital facilities, equipment and contents
insured against loss by fire, explosion and other casualty in reliable insurance
companies in such amounts as the Authority may deem necessary, and the
I
Authority agrees to pay the premiums for such insurance.
9. The Authority agrees to maintain an accounting system in such a
manner as to give a true and accurate accounting of financial transactions of
the hospital facility.
I
10. The Authority agrees to furnish the County an audit report at least
annually by a Certified Public Accountant designated by the County and such
other, information of a fiscal nature as may be required by the County.
11. The County shall have the right, ,after review of the financial status
of the Authority, to require any excess cash in the opinion of the County to be
transferred from the Authority to the County to help cover the hospital bond
commitments for payment of principal and interest.
12, If the Authority fails to comply with any of the terms and condition
of this agreement, said County may re-enter and take possession of said hos-
pital facilities, and use or re -let the same as if this agreement had not been
entered into.

BOOK 477 PAU207
13, The Authority agrees that in the event of its failure at any time to
operate said hospital facilities as herein provided, the Authority shall
deliver and convey all its moneys, properties and other assets to the County
14. Regardless of any other provision hereof, the Authority shall oper
ate pursuant to and under the provisions of Article 12, Chapter 131 of the Gen-
eral Statutes of North Carolina.
15L The County shall be solely responsible for naming the hospital
being constructed upon the leased premises.
16. The Authority shall have the right and option to purchase the prop-
erty herein leased during the term of this lease for a sum to be mutually
agreed upon by the parties hereto at the time of purchase and the County, upor
receipt from the Authority of the purchase price agreed upon, shall transfer
any and all assets of the hospital facility or facilities, both tangible and intan-
gible, including cash, to the Authority.
IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, the County has caused this instrument to
be executed in its corporate name by the Chairman of its Board of Commis-
sioners and attested by the Clerk to said Board, all by authority of the Board
Of Commissioners duly given and the Authority has caused this instrument to
be executed by its Chairman and attested by its Secretary, all by authority of
its Board of Trustees duly given and flies respective corporate seals to be
hereunto affixed this the day and year first above written.
,V
BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS OF
r
ONSLOW COUNTY
BY:�r) n rai n 1hQ—�
!221—CI rk Chairman
ONSLOW COUN^Y HOSPITAL AU': HORITy
By; ,
ecre ary Char an
1
a �

bou 477 ( PACEGVO
NORTH CAROLINA:
ONSLOW COUNTY:
This (_ day of 222 0-7 � _, 1973, personally came before
me Timothy Wood, who, being by me duly sworn, says that he knows the com-
mon seal of the Board of Commissioners of Onslow County, and is acquainted
with Ormond Barbee, who is Chairman of said Board, and that he, Timothy
Wood, is Clerk Ex-Officio to said Board, and saw the said Chairman sign the
foregoing instrument and saw the said common seal of said Board affixed to th
said instrument by the Chairman, and that he, Timothy Wood, signed his name
in attestation of the execution of said instrument in the presence of the Chain .
man.
1973.
Witness my hand and notarial seal, this day offQ,.,,
My commission expires; tk
Notary Pu is
NORTH CAROLINA:
CAROLINA:
ONSLOW COUNTY:
Personally appeared before me Glenn L. Hooper Jr
who, being by me duly, sworn, says that he is Chairman of the Onslow County
Hospital Authority and that saia writing was signed and sealed by him in
behalf of said body by its authority duly given. And the said Chairman
ledged the said writing to be the act and deed of said Onslow County Hospital
Authority.
Witness my hand, and official seal, this day of
1973.
Notary Public
My commission expires:
-ZZ4v al t 19Z�,

BOOK 41 ( PACE�9
NORTH CAROLINA, ONSLOW COUNTY,
The foregoing certificates of Jane T. price and William E. Mann, Jr,
are certified to be correct. This instrument was presented for
-registration and recorded in this office in Book 477, Page 204.
This 20 day of May, 1976 at 11:48 o'clock A.M.
MiYdred M. Thomas, Register of Deeds,

k
o"'In ,, 1. L.:�s :'i�= w.: r: •.t. .<:.
3q_a_ _ ✓:"::., �ii' .k !i�.ik".... )t ,.nF.. ° =aa M„tb. .14, 0..., _. C.,
625
and saw, the said Chairman sign the foregoing instrument and'saw the said common seal
of said Board affixed to the said instrument by the Chairman, and that she, Mildred M.
Thomas, signed her name in attestation of the execution of said instrument in the pre-
sence of the Chairman.
Witness my hand and notarial Beal, this 22nd day of October, 1969.
A111BOD Campers
My commission "expires: 4-14-71 Notary Public
N. P. Seal.
NORTH CAROLINA
ONSLOW COUNTY
The foregoing certificates of Mary Jane Webster and Allison Campen is certified to be
correct..
This 1 day of December, A. D. 1969.
Mildred M. Thomas, Register of Deeds
Filed for registration 3 o'clock P.M. December 1, 1969, and duly recorded Dec, 1, 1969,
Mildred M. Thomas, Register of Deeds
WEYERHAEUSER PROPERTIES, INC.
TO
ONSLOW COUNTY December 1, 1969
M NORTH CAROLINA
�ONSLOW COUNTY DEED
`i THIS DEED, made this 7th day of October, 1969, b Weyerhaeuser Pro
YJk Y Y y parting, Inc., a
corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Washington, euthOriza
to do business in the State of North Carolina, with an office in the City of Tacoma,
(State of Washington, party of the first part, to ONSLOW COUNTY, a body politic and
J corporate under the laws of the State of North Carolina, party o1 the second part: `
WITNESSETH:
i
.,�.' That said party of the first part, in consideration of TEN DOLLARS ($10.00) and other
valuable considerations to it paid by the party of the second part, the receipt of
q - which is hereby acknowledged, has bargained and sold and by these presents does grant,
bargain, sell, and convey to said Onsiow County, party of the second part, its success
and assigns, a certain tract or parcel of land located on the eastern side of Western
Boulevard in Jacksonville Township, Onslow County, North Carolina, said tract of land
being more fully described as follows:
i
Beginning at an iron stake in the western right of way line of Western Boulevard
State Road 1470 which stake is 1184.88 feet from the center line of Carolina Power andl
Light Company 100 foot right of way when measured along Western Boulevard right of wayl
S in a northern direction; thence from said beginning South 85 degrees 52' West 250.0
? JJfeet to an iron stake; thence South 4 degrees 08' East 642.10 feet to an iron stake
Il in the center of a 30 foot drainage and utility easement; thence following the center j
wNN of the easement South 35 degrees 30' West 174.47 feet to a point on top of a corrugateG
metal pipe in the northern right of way of Oxford Road; thence following said right off
way North 53 degrees 02' West 1350.61 feet to an iron stake; thence South 26 degrees
31' West 20.34 feet to an iron stake in the northern right of way line of Carolina
. Power and Light Company right of way; thence following said right of way North 52 de- I
-r grees 59' West 610.50 feet to an iron stake in the Stiles and White property line; l
thence following the said line North 26 degrees 31' East 412.82 feet to a Railroad
iron, Arnold heirs corner; thence following the Arnold line North 17 degrees 50' East
'628.80 feet to an iron stake; thence South 65 degrees 08' East 1207.01 feet to the
.i point of curvature; said curve having a radius of 411.97 feet; thence with the curve
JJJJ1 in a northeastern direction an are distance of 217.14 feet, to the point of tangency;
thence North 84 degrees 40' East 138.83 feet to an iron stake in the right of way curve
of Western Boulevard; as id curve having a radius of 3111.46 feet; thence in a south- I
eastern direction with the right of way an arc distance of 65.0 feet to the point of
3 tangency; thence continuing with the right of way South 4 degrees 08' East 735.0 feet
to the point of beginning; being a small portion of the Weyerhaeuser Properties, Inc.j
Land, Parcel 6, recorded in Map Book 9, Page 45, and Parcel 3, recorded In Hap Book 101
Page 42, Onslow County Registry. ,
Subject to a 20 foot easement across the Western Boulevard frontage used jointly by
Jones-Onslow Electric Membership Corporation; Bryan Marr Utility Company, utility
easement; Weyerhaeuser Properties, Inc., drainage easement.
This Deed is also made subject to the terms conditions and covenants contained i❑
that certain Agreement between the parties hereto dated October 7, 1969, and which
has been duly filed for record with the Register of Deeds for Onslow County, North
l' Carolina.
TO.HAVE AND TO HOLD, the aforesaid tract or parcel of land and all privileges and
appurtenances thereto belonging, to the said Onslow County, party of the second part,
its successors and assigns, to its only use and behoof forever.
7:7UUS.:...tu x >� .. qi, ,7. �
,...-........,.e';:....uhf;�ii4:4:'W..s4i'4' 6: a :+..:.:au:ui,`i "�Cf;.'{((1
a
ti

:qq7• 14 p
^" WACCai ty
390
nn
�.'
F�
And the said party of the first part, for itself and its successors and assigns, covens
is
I,with the said party of the second part,, its successors and assigns, that it ie seized;,
!;
of said premises in fee and has a right to convey, in fee simple; that the same are free
from
and clear all encumbrances, except .for the easements and agreement hereinabove re-
F,'yjr
r%
Mi
yferred to, and that it does hereby forever warrant and will forever defend the sold
t it le to the same against the claims of all persona whomsoever,
F
rPIN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, the said .Weyerhaeuser Properties, Inc., party of the first part
�i'-•�
�
;has caused these presents to be signed in its corporate name by its Vice -President and.
attested by its Assistant Secretary and its corporate seal to be hereunto affixed, the
")• �,.. ('
;day and year first above written.
9 WEYERHAEUSER PROPERTIES, INC,
r
7 BY Lon Varnadore
�('•
Vice President
'ATTEST: Lloyd C. Reed
Assistant Secretary
,CORPORATE
SEAL
STATE OF WASHINGTON
*'
COUNTY OF PIERCE
"
I, Mary Jane Webster, a Notary Public, do hereby certify that Lloyd C. Reed personally
'
appeared before me this day and -acknowledged that he is Assistant Secretary of Weyer-
haeuser Properties, Inc., a corporation, and that by authority duly given and as the
',•:
'act of the corporation, the foregoing instrument was signed in its name by its Vice -
President, sealed with its corporate seal, and attested by himself as its Assistant
Secretary.
(•
Witness my hand and notarial seal, this 22nd day of October, 1889.
Mary Jane Webster
'My commission expires: 2-14-73 Notary Public
�'.
N. P. Seal.
NORTH CAROLINA.
�'•
ONSLOW COUNTY
The foregoing certificate of Mary Jane Webster is certified to be correct.
This I day of December, A. D. 1969.
_
Mildred M. Thomas, Register of Deeds
Filed for registration 3:30 o'clock P.M. December 1, 1969, and duly recorded Dec, 1,
I:
.1969.
r,
Mildred M, Thomas, Register of Deeds
?;
#######################################################################################
# 4
+y�
WEYERHAEUSER PROPERTIES, INC.
TO
DONALD BAYBDON AND WIFE December 1, 1989
f.
NORTH CAROLINA
a".•I
ONSLOW COUNTY DEED
-
THIS DEED, made this 29th day of October, 1969, by WEYERHAEUSER PROPERTIES INC.,
corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Washington, authorized
to do business in the State of North Carolina, with an office in the City of Tacoma,
-
State of Washington, party of the first part, to Donald Baysdon and wife, Ina Bayedon,
of Onslow County, North Carolina, parties of the second part;
"
WITNESSETH: That said party of the first pert, in consideration of ONE HUNDRED DOLLARS
($100,00)
"' �•'
and other valuable considerations to it paid by the parties of the second par
the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, has bargained and sold and by these present,8
does grant, bargain, sell and convey to said Donald Bayedon and wife, Ina Bayedon,
parties of the second part, their heirs and assigns, a certain tract or parcel of land
lying and being in Jacksonville Township, Onslow County, North Carolina, and more parti
`s
cularly bounded and described as follows:
!a
BEGINNING at an iron stake in the right of way of Seaboard Coastline Railroad; which
i
•
stake is 130.0 feet from the center line of Fairway Road when measured along the �f•ail-
'road
right of way in a northeastern direction; said Fairway Road is hewn on a map of
Weyerhaeuser Properties,
-
Inc., Parcel 4, Block A, recorded in Map Book 9, -Page 66,
•Onslow
County Registry, for a more complete reference, thence from said beginning and
•
;following the railroad right of way North 54 degrees 25' East 600.0 feet to Ah iron
"
•
stake; thence following the line South 35 degrees 33' East 400.0 feet to an iron stake'
�in the proposed right of way line of Commerce Road; thence following same proposed righ
Hof
way South 54 degrees 25' West 600.0 feet to an iron stake; thence following the line
North 35
degrees 35' West 400.0 feet to the point of beginning. Subject to the restric
't ive and protective covenants appearing of record in the chain of title.
S
•I
TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the aforesaid tract or c i
enances thereto belonging, to the said Donald Baysdona andwife,Ina Bayed n,o partiesappur
of the second part, their heirs and assigns, to their only use and behoof forever,
And the said party of the first part, for itself and its successors and assigns, covenants
_
'
�rith said parties of the second part, their heirs and assigns, that it is seized of asi
-
remises,in fee and has a right to convey in tee simple, that the some are free and
y'
s'
u

Design Calculations
Existing Wet Detention Pond Capacity Analysis
for
Onslow Memorial ER & Surgical Suite Pavilion
located in
Onslow County
1. PROJECT DESCRIPTION
I
Check the capacity of the existing Wet Detention Pond constructed to accommodate the Pocket of High Density
which includes the ER and Surgical Pavilion, to accommodate this project, proposed Driveway/Parking Improvements-
2. EXISTING AND PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS AREAS/DRAINAGE AREA
a. Compute Percent Impervious:
Impervious Areas:
On -Site Buildings
On -Site Streets
On -Site Parking
On -Site Sidewalks
Other on -site
Off -site
Sub -Total
FUTURE
FUTURE(reserved)
Total
Total Area Drainage to Pond:
Percent Impervious =
2. POND SURFACE AREA ANALYSIS
69,313 -- `
C
_.0
92,225
8,233- :.
L
0
169.771
3,6R
Total
69,313 SF
0 SF
95,885 SF
8,233 SF
0
0
173,431 SF
0SF
0 0 0
169,771 3,660 173,431 SF
0.292 or 29.2 %
a. Compare Required Pond Surface area to that Provided in existing Pond:
Using Surface Area to Drainage Area Ratio Chart for 90% TSS Removal (copy attached) and
assuming foot pond depth: (per existing permit)
sq-T, T5_B1 SF
SA/DA = 2.63 % (interpolated - Select from Highlighted Cell in SA/DA)
Therefore:
Surface Area = SA/DA x Drainage Area
Required Surface Area = 15,609 sfi� :;. 9€;83ik, sf Provided per Permit
Must be > 15,609 sf (OK)

Stormwater Treatment Narrative
ER & Surgical Services Pavilion - Onslow Memorial Hospital
Modification to SW8 950317
Onslow Memorial Hospital currently holds a stormwater permit SW8 950317 authorizing all the existing development and
impervious surfaces located on their 44.72 acre tract located on Western Boulevard. Current permit is a Low Density
permit which includes a "Pocket of High Density"
The Hospital now proposes to construct Driveway and Parking Improvements in the rear (westerly portion) of their site.
This project (Driveway/Parking Improvements Plan) spans both the Low Density and High Density "zones" of that permit.
The portion of the project within the Low Density zone results in less impervious surface (4,630 sf BUA to be removed)
than that currently allowed by the permit. However, that portion of the project within the High Density zone results in a net
increase of 3,660 sf of impervious surface (7,310 sf BUA to be added & 3,650 sf BUA to be removed).
Calculations are attached which indicate that the existing wet detention pond serving this Pocket of High Density area is
more than adequate to accommodate the marinal increase in BUA associated with this project.

1. PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Design Calculations
Stormwater Treatment Facilities
for
Onslow Memorial Radiation Oncology Pavillion
located in
Onslow County
The Project consists of proposed expansion to hospital.
2. COMPUTE POND AREA REQUIRED
a. Compute Percent Impervious:
Impervious Areas
On -Site Buildings
On -Site Streets
On -Site Parking
On -Site Sidewalks
Other on -site
Off -site
Sub -Total
FUTURE
FUTURE(reserved)
Total
Total Area Drainage to Pond:
Percent Impervious =
b. Compute Pond Surface Area
10 `
�p
':50,532 ':.::`:
38s71
692 '`
25©8
4 ...
0
Total
9,824 SF
0 SF
89,503 SF
3,200 SF
0
0
102,527 SF
0 SF
0 41,000 41,000
51,224 92,303 143,527 SF
0.830 or 83.0 %
-17-2-,9-4-51 SF
Using Surface Area to Drainage Area Ratio Chart for 90% TSS Removal (copy attached) and
assuming : ;326 foot pond depth:
SA/DA = 9.01 % (interpolated - Select from Highlighted Cell in SA/DA)
Therefore:
Surface Area = SA/DA x Drainage Area
= 15,589 SF say fS:,:66>"fSF
must be > 15,589 SF

c. Compute Minimum Pond Dimensions
Assume rectangular shape with 3:1 Length (L) to Width (W) Ratio:
Min Length = 216.26 feet
Min Width = 72.09 feet
Site conditions, however, dictate irregular shaped pond:
Hydr. Length = `:377:7784;0 feet
so, Hydr. Width (a% 55.0 feet (avg)
Actual L/W = 5.2 (irregular shape)
3. DETERMINE REQUIRED STORAGE VOLUME
Design Rainfall Depth = 15 inches
Using Schuler "Simple Method":
Rv = 0.05 + 0.009(I) where I = percent impervious
Rv = 0.797 in/in
Control Volume = Design Rainfall x Rv x Drainage Area
'y+ ._
..,...
Control Volume = 17,228 CF say";;j73?77wCF
Must be> 17,228 SF
4. DETERMINE REQUIRED STORAGE DEPTH
Assume: 3:1 side slopes
solving for depth (d) by trial & error:
d = 1.04
5. DETERMINE ORIFICE SIZE
Control Volume must be drawn down over a 2 day - 5 day period.
Using orifice equation, solve for Diameter (D) that results in 3-1/2 day period:
D=(Q/0.026(h)e)"
Where: Q = (Control Volume / 3.5 days x 86,400 sec/day)
0.057 cis
h= D/3
= 0.35

Solving for D:
D = 1.93 Use[`:::'.:'-:;2;tj0 " pipe
Actual Drawdown with actual drawdown pipe diameter (using orifice equation):
Q= 0.061 cfs
Draw Down Period = F�K . - ::,,x ' $days OK, 5.0
6. SELECT OUTLET STRUCTURE SIZE
Size outlet structure such that depth of Q 10 flow < or + to F77T7Feet
Using Rational Formula (Q=CIA) where:
Cimper
Cpery= 0.2
Ccum = 0.69
110 = 716 in/hr
A = 3.97 ac
Q10 = 19.60 cfs
Using Francis Formula (Q=3.OLH"') to solve for L such that H =
Min L = 3.556 Linear Feet
Use —77—, 4 Linear Foot Weir
Use 5 Square Precast Structure
7. DETERMINE 010 STAGE
Q 10 = 19.60 cfs
From Routing Analysis, H10=
B. DETERMINE Q100 STAGE (ELEV. OF EMERGENCY SPILLWAY)
Using Rational Formula (Q=CIA) where:
Cimper=
0.8
Cpery =
0.2
Ccum =
0.69
1100 = 7* ;. `.950 in/hr
A =
3.97 ac
1.5 Feet

Q100= 26.00 cfs
From Routing Analysis, H100
36.53
9. DETERMINE Q100 STAGE OVER EMERGENCY SPILLWAY (TOP BERM ELEV.)
Assume primary spillway blocked (i.e., emergency spillway to accommodate Q100)
Emergency spillway shall be a broad crested earthern weir designed to pass 100 year storm.
Using broad crested weir equation H = (Q/(Cw x L))211
where: Q = Q100 26.00 cfs
Cw = 3.0
Length = . :30 feet
H = 0.44 feet
10. FOREBAY SIZING
Compute Actual Pond Volumes (using average end method)
Avg
Incr. Incr.
Cum.
Main Bay Volume - Elevation Area (SF) Area (SF l Depth
(FT l Vol (CF)
Vol 1CF1
Pond Bottom 27.001';fl56
Bottom Veg Shelf 3,50" ';"" 9;t378 5,367
6.50 34,886
34,886
Normal Pond _y34.66 -°' ,.i2,839 11,159
0.50 5,579
40,465
Main Bay Volume = 40,465 CF
Embabay Volume Elevation Area (SF) Area (SF Dv th (FT) Vol (CF l Vol (CF)
Pond Bottom .29.00 :.1;225
Normal Pond 34.00 ::':.``3;a22 2,124 5.00 10,618 10,618
Forebay Volume = 10,618 CF
Total Pond Volume = 51,082 CF
Total Pond Area = 15,661 SF
ForebaY q Volume equates to '' ''>'y' •<(#-$ % of Total Volume
H>
Must be > 18% and < 22%
Average Pond Depth = 3.26 feet
S
Compare to assumed Depth u��;�;�Fr�feet
Imp.Storage Volume • Elevation Area (SF) Area (SF) Depth (FT) Vol (CF 1 o C
Normal Pond 34.00 15,661
Temp. Pond Level ":35ip0 =`':.18;t�93 17,327 1.00 17.327 17,327

Temporary Level should be 35.04 or greater
Temp. Pool Volume = 17,327 CF
11. SUMMARY
Pond Elevations:
Top Berm (minimum)
Relative
9.91
Actual
35.91
H= 0.44
100-Yr. Storm
9.47
35.47 (emerg. weir elev)
H100 = 1.47
10-Yr. Storm
9.24
35.24
H10 = 1.24
1-inch Storage
8.00
35.00 (primary weir elev)
storage depth = 1.00
Permanent Pool
7.00
34.00 (invert out elev)
pond depth = 7.00
Pond Bottom
0
27.00
12, WET DETENTION BASIN SUPPLEMENT
Site Characteristics
Drainage Area
172,945 sf
Impervious Area
143,527 sf
% Impervious
83.0 %
Design Rainfall Depth
1.5 in
Storage Volume
Min. Volume Required
17,228 cf
Volume Provided
17,327 cf
Peak Flow Calculations
1-yr, 24 hour rainfall depth
3i65
in
Rational C, predevelopment
0:45
Rational C, post development
0.69
Rainfall Intensity 1 yr24 hr
0.15 in/hr
Pre Dev Q1(24 hour)
0.27
Post Dev Q1 (24 hour)
0.42
Pre/Post Flow Control
0.14
Basin Elevations

Basin Bottom Elevation 26.00 feet (Elev)
Sediment Cleanout Elevation 27.00 feet (Elev)
Permanent Pool Elevation 34.00 feet (Elev)
Temporary Pool Elevation 35.00 feet (Elev)
Volume and Surface Area Calculations
SA/DA ratio
9.01
Surface Area Required
15,589 sf
Surface Area Provided
15,661 sf
Permanent Pool Volume
51,082 cf
Average Depth
3.26 feet
Forebay Volume
10,618 cf
Forebay % of Total Volume
20.8 %
Temporary pool Area
18,993 sf
Drawdown Calculations
Drawdown Time 3.28 days
Discharge Rate 0.061 cfs
Pre Dev Q1(24 hour) 0.27 cfs
Post Dev Q1 (24 hour) 0.42 cfs
Additional Information
Diameter of orifice
2.00 in
Design TSS Removal
90 %
Basin Side Slopes
3 :1
Vegetated Shelf Slope
10 :1
Vegetated Shelf Width
10 ft
Length to Width Ratio
5 :1
Trash Rack?
Yes
Freeboard Provided?
Yes
Vegetated Filter Provided?
No
Recorded Easement?
Yes
Captures all Runoff?
Yes
Drain Mechanism
Pump

Simplified Routing Procedure
Project:
;Onslomvtemorjal RatliatioN©ncolog`Pavillion 10 Yr Event
Date:
Increment
"tl °"'""
^,.���1�
minutes
(Must be <
15 minutes)
Time
Time
Inflow(cfs)
Inflow
Stored Volume
'Stage Water Surface
Orifice
Outflow
Weir
Outflow
Pump
Outflow
Total
Outflow
Total
Outflow
(gin)
Wan)
1rw
�4
CFD
(ftl Elevaton
(-QW
(sfsl
(QW
(-QW
(-QD
0
0.0
0.00
0.00
0
0.00
34.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0
1
0.0
0.22
12.98
13
0.00
34.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0
2
0.0
0.86
51.35
64
0.01
34.01
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.01
1
3
0.0
1.89
113.42
177
0.02
34.02
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.01
1
4
0.0
3.27
196.45
373
0.03
34.03
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.02
1
5
0.0
4.95
296.77
668
0.06
34.06
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.02
1
6
0.0
6.83
409.96
1077
0.08
34.08
0.03
0.00
0.00
0.03
2
7
0.0
8.85
531.02
1606
0.12
34.12
0.04
0.00
0.00
0.04
2
8
0.0
10.91
654.62
2258
0.16
34.16
0.04
0.00
0.00
0.04
3
9
0.0
12.92
775.29
3031
0.21
34.21
0.05
0.00
0.00
0.05
3
10
0.0
14.80
887.72
3916
0.27
34.27
0.05
0.00
0.00
0.05
3
11
0.0
16.45
986.94
4900
0.33
34.33
0.06
0.00
0.00
0.06
4
12
0.0
17.81
1068.57
5965
0.39
34.39
0.07
0.00
0.00
0.07
4
13
0.0
18.82
1129.02
7090
0.45
34.45
0.07
0.00
0.00
0.07
4
14
0.0
19.43
1165,61
8251
0.52
34.52
0.08
0.00
0.00
0.08
5
15
0.0
19.61
1176.74
9423
0.58
34.58
0.08
0.00
0.00
0.08
5
16
0.0
19.37
1161.90
10580
0.65
34.65
0.08
0.00
0.00
0.08
5
17
0.0
18.70
1121.76
11697
0.71
34.71
0.09
0.00
0.00
0.09
5
18
0.0
17.63
1058.08
12750
0.76
34.76
0.09
0.00
0.00
0.09
6
19
0.0
16.26
975.73
13720
0.82
34.82
0.09
0.00
0.00
0.09
6
20
0.0
14.91
894.32
14609
0.86
34.86
0.10
0.00
0.00
0.10
6
21
0.0
13.66
819.71
15422
0.91
34.91
0.10
0.00
0.00
0.10
6
22
0.0
12.52
751.32
16168
0.94
34.94
0.10
0.00
0.00
0.10
6
23
0.0
11.48
688.63
16850
0.98
34.98
0.10
0.00
0.00
0.10
6
24
0.0
10.52
631.18
17475
1.01
35.01
0.11
0.02
0.00
0.12
7
25
0.0
9.64
578.52
18046
1.04
35.04
0.11
0.10
0.00
0.21
13

26
0.0
8.84
530.25
18564
1.07
35.07
0.11
0.22
0.00
0.32
19
27
0.0
8.10
486.01
19031
1.09
35.09
0.11
0.34
0.00
0.45
27
28
0.0
7.42
445.47
19449
1.11
35.11
0.11
0.46
0.00
0.57
34
29
0.0
6.80
408.30
19823
1.13
35.13
0.11
0.58
0.00
0.69
42
30
0.0
6.24
374.23
20156
1.15
35.15
0.11
0.69
0.00
0.81
48
31
0.0
5.72
343.01
20451
1.16
35.16
0.11
0.80
0.00
0.91
55
32
0.0
5.24
314.39
20710
1.18
35.18
0.11
0.90
0.00
1.01
61
33
0.0
4.80
288.16
20937
1.19
35.19
0.11
0.99
0.00
1.10
66
34
0.0
4.40
264.12
21135
1.20
35.20
0.11
1.07
0.00
1.18
71
35
0.0
4.03
242.09
21307
1.21
35.21
0.12
1.14
0.00
1.25
75
36
0.0
3.70
221.89
21453
1.22
35.22
0.12
1.20
0.00
1.31
79
37
0.0
3.39
203.38
21578
1.22
35.22
0.12
1.25
0.00
1.37
82
38
0.0
3.11
186.41
21682
1.23
35.23
0.12
1.30
0.00
1.41
85
39
0.0
2.85
170.86
21768
1.23
35.23
0.12
1.33
0.00
1.45
87
40
0.0
2.61
156.60
21838
1.23
35.23
0.12
1.36
0.00
1.48
89
41
0.0
2.39
143.54
21893
1.24
35.24
0.12
1.39
0.00
1.50
90
42
0.0
2.19
131.56
21934
1.24
35.24
0.12
1.41
0.00
1.52
91
43
0.0
2.01
120.58
21963
1.24
35.24
0.12
1.42
0.00
1.54
92
44
0.0
1.84
110.52
21981
1.24
35.24
0.12
1.43
0.00
1.54
93
45
0.0
1.69
101.30
21990
1.24
35.24
0.12
1.43
0.00
1.55
93
46
0.0
1.55
92.85
21990
1.24
35.24
0.12
1.43
0.00
1.55
93
47
0.0
1.42
85.10
21982
1.24
35.24
0.12
1.43
0.00
1.54
93
48
0.0
1.30
78.00
21968
1.24
35.24
0.12
1.42
0.00
1.54
92
49
0.0
1.19
71.50
21947
1.24
35.24
0.12
1.41
0.00
1.53
92
50
0.0
1.09
65.53
21921
1.24
35.24
0.12
1.40
0.00
1.52
91
51
0.0
1.00
60.06
21890
1.24
35.24
0.12
1.39
0.00
1.50
90
52
0.0
0.92
55.05
21855
1.24
35.24
0.12
1.37
0.00
1.49
89
53
0.0
0.84
50.46
21816
1.23
35.23
0.12
1.35
0.00
1.47
88
54
0.0
0.77
46.25
21774
1.23
35.23
0.12
1.34
0.00
1.45
87
55
0.0
0.71
42.39
21729
1.23
35.23
0.12
1.32
0.00
1.43
86
56
0.0
0.65
38.85
21682
1.23
35.23
0.12
1.30
0.00
1.41
85
57
0.0
0.59
35.61
21638
1.22
35.22
0.12
1.27
0.00
1.39
83
58
0.0
0.54
32.64
21582
1.22
35.22
0.12
1.25
0.00
1.37
82
59
0.0
0.50
29.92
21530
1.22
35.22
0.12
1.23
0.00
1.35
81
60
0.0
0.46
27.42
21476
1.22
35.22
0.12
1.21
0.00
1.32
79
61
0.0
0.42
25.13
21422
1.21
35.21
0.12
1.19
0.00
1.30
78

62
63
0.0
0.0
0.38
23.04
21367
1.21
35.21
0.12
1.16
0.00
1.28
77
64
0.0
0.35
0.32
21.11
21311
1.21
35.21
0.12
1.14
0.00
1.25
75
65
0.0
0.30
19.35
17.74
21256
1.21
35.21
0.12
1.12
0.00
1.23
74
66
0.0
0.27
16.26
21199
1.20
35.20
0.12
1.09
0.00
1.21
72
67
0.0
0.25
14.90
21143
1.20
35.20
0.11
1.07
0.00
1.19
71
68
0.0
0.23
13.66
21087
1.20
35.20
0.11
1.05
0.00
1.16
70
69
0.0
0.21
12.52
21031
1.19
35.19
0.11
1.02
0.00
1.14
68
70
0.0
0.19
11.47
20975
1.19
35.19
0.11
1.00
0.00
1.12
67
71
0.0
0.18
10.52
20919
20864
1.19
35.19
0.11
0.98
0.00
1.10
66
72
0.1
0.16
9.64
20809
1.19
1.18
35.19
0.11
0.96
0.00
1.07
64
73
0.1
0.15
8.84
20755
1.18
35.18
0.11
0.94
0.00
1.05
63
74
0.1
0.13
8.10
20701
1.18
35.18
0.11
0.92
0.00
1.03
62
75
0.1
0.12
7.42
20648
1.17
35.18
0.11
0.90
0.00
1.01
61
76
0.1
0.11
6.80
20596
1.17
35.17
0.11
0.88
0.00
0.99
59
77
0.1
0.10
6.24
20544
1.17
35.17
0.11
0.86
0.00
0.97
58
78
0.1
0.10
5.72
20493
1.17
35.17
0.11
0.84
0.00
0.95
57
79
0.1
0.09
5.24
20442
1.16
35.17
0.11
0.82
0.00
0.93
56
80
0.1
0.08
4.80
20392
35.16
0.11
0.80
0.00
0.91
55
81
0.1
0.07
4.40
20343
1.16
1.16
35.16
0.11
0.78
0.00
0.89
54
82
0.1
0.07
4.03
20294
1.16
35.16
0.11
0.76
0.00
0.87
52
83
0.1
0.06
3.70
20247
1.15
35.16
35.15
0.11
0.74
0.00
0.86
51
84
0.1
0.06
3.39
20200
1.15
35.15
0.11
0.11
0.73
0.00
0.84
50
85
0.1
0.05
3.11
20153
1.15
35.15
0.11
0.71
0.69
0.00
0.00
0.82
49
86
87
0.1
0.05
2.85
20108
1.15
35.15
0.11
0.68
0.00
0.81
0.79
48
47
88
0.1
0.1
0.04
0.04
2.61
20063
1.14
35.14
0.11
0.66
0.00
0.77
46
89
0.1
0.04
2.39
2.19
20019
1.14
35.14
0.11
0.65
0.00
0.76
46
90
0.1
0.03
2.01
19976
1.14
35.14
0.11
0.63
0.00
0.74
45
91
0.1
0.03
1.84
19933
1.14
35.14
0.11
0.62
0.00
0.73
44
92
0.1
0.03
1.69
19891
1.14
35.14
0.11
0.60
0.00
0.72
43
93
0.1
0.03
1.55
19850
1.13
35.13
0.11
0.59
0.00
0.70
42
94
0.1
0.02
1.42
19809
1.13
35.13
0.11
0.58
0.00
0.69
41
95
0.1
0.02
1.30
19770
1.13
35.13
0.11
0.56
0.00
0.67
40
96
0.1
0.02
1.19
19730
1.13
35.13
0.11
0.55
0.00
0.66
40
97
0.1
0.02
1.09
19692
1.13
35.13
0.11
0.54
0.00
0.65
39
19654
1.12
35.12
0.11
0.52
0.00
0.64
38

98
99
0.1
0.02
1.00
19617
1.12
35.12
100
0.1
0.1
0.02
0.92
19580
1.12
35.12
101
0.1
0.01
0.84
19544
1.12
35.12
102
0.1
0.01
0.01
0.77
19509
1.12
35.12
103
0.1
0.01
0.71
19475
1.12
35.12
104
0.1
0.01
0.65
19440
1.11
35.11
105
0.1
0.01
0.59
19407
1.11
35.11
106
0.1
0.01
0.54
0.50
19374
1.11
35.11
107
0.1
0.01
0.46
19342
1.11
35.11
108
0.1
0.01
0.42
19
1.11
35.11
109
0.1
0.01
0.38
1927979
1.11
35.11
110
0.1
0.01
0.35
19248
1.10
35.10
111
0.1
0.01
0.32
19218
1.10
35.10
112
0.1
0.00
0.30
19188
1.10
35.10
113
0.1
0.00
0.27
19159
1.10
35.10
114
0.1
0.00
0.25
19130
1.10
35.10
115
0.1
0.00
0.23
19102
1.10
35.10
116
0.1
0.00
0.21
19074
1.09
35.09
117
0.1
0.00
0.19
190
1.09
35.09
118
0.1
0.00
0.18
19020
1.09
35.09
119
0.1
0.00
0.16
18993
1.09
35.09
120
0.1
0.00
0.15
18967
1.09
3509
18942
1.09
35.09
0.11
0.51
0.00
0.62
37
0.11
0.50
0.00
0.61
37
0.11
0.49
0.00
0.60
36
0.11
0.48
0.00
0.59
35
0.11
0.47
0.00
0.58
35
0.11
0.46
0.00
0.57
34
0.11
0.45
0.00
0.56
33
0.11
0.44
0.00
0.55
33
0.11
0.43
0.00
0.54
32
0.11
0.42
0.00
0.53
32
0.11
0.41
0.00
0.52
31
0.11
0.40
0.00
0.51
31
0.11
0.39
0.00
0.50
30
0.11
0.38
0.00
0.49
30
0.11
0.37
0.00
0.48
29
0.11
0.36
0.00
0.47
28
0.11
0.36
0.00
0.47
28
0.11
0.35
0.00
0.46
28
0.11
0.34
0.00
0.45
27
0.11
0.33
0.00
0.44
27
0.11
0.33
0.00
0.44
26
0.11
0.32
0.00
0.43
26
0.11
0.31
0.00
0.42
25

Inflow Hydrograph
C=
; AI-N0?69
(Using Malcolm Step Function)
I =
"; �7;,',1(6) in/hr
A=
tE 3Q7 a
Qpeak
19.6 cfs
tp =
15 minutes
Time Flow (Q)
(min) (cfs)
0 0.00
1 0.22
2 0.86
3 1.89
4 3.27
5 4.95
6 6.83
7 8.85
8 10.91
9 12.92
10 14.80
11 16.45
12 17.81
13 18.82
14 19.43
15 19.61
16 19.37
17 18.70
18 17.63
19 16.26
20 14.91
21 13.66
22 12.52
23 11.48
24 10.52
25 9.64
26 8.84
27 8.10
28 7.42
29 6.80
30 6.24
31 5.72
32 5.24
33 4.80
34 4.40
35 4.03
36 3.70
37 3.39
38 3.11
39 2.85
Length W'shed=RIM
Height W'shed= jX
tc= 15

40 2.61
41 2.39
42 2.19
43 2.01
44 1.84
45 1.69
46 1.55
47 1.42
48 1.30
49 1.19
50 1.09
51 1.00
52 0.92
53 0.84
54 0.77
55 0.71
56 0.65
57 0.59
58 0.54
59 0.50
60 0.46
61 0.42
62 0.38
63 0.35
64 0.32
65 0.30
66 0.27
67 0.25
68 0.23
69 0.21
70 0.19
71 0.18
72 0.16
73 0.15
74 0.13
75 0.12
76 0.11
77 0.10
78 0.10
79 0.09
80 0.08
81 0.07
82 0.07
83 0.06
84 0.06
85 0.05
86 0.05
87 0.04
88 0.04
89 0.04

90
0.03
91
0.03
92
0.03
93
0.03
94
0.02
95
0.02
96
0.02
97
0.02
98
0.02
99
0.02
100
0.01
101
0.01
102
0.01
103
0.01
104
0.01
105
0.01
106
0.01
107
0.01
108
0.01
109
0.01
110
0.01
111
0.01
112
0.00
113
0.00
114
0.00
115
0.00
116
0.00
117
0.00
118
0.00
119
0.00
120
0.00

Accum
Z
Volume
StagQ 1t1S 11 Z
Z2 1 Comment
0
0
Contour at Normal Pond (wet pond) or Basin Bottc
17327
1 46 6Q021='`=zL°°'c "> 0=
1.004911
37220
2 ti51'055246 ,0 6931,472
1.984151
58939
3; ,POF98426a Pi0986.1,231
2.986716
82536.5
4 +' 9`16?321 r1"3862944°
4.030093
108065.5
5 11.59049 1.6094379
5.122162
135578.5
6 11.81731 1.7917595
6.267551 Contour at Berm Top
b = 1.1239005
Ks = 17231.858
,Regression Analysis Y Data Range
Regression Analysis X Data Range
SUMMARY OUTPUT
Regression Statistics
Multiple R 0.9999248
R Square 0.9998495
Adjusted R 0.9997743
Standard E 0.0101518
Observatio 4
ANOVA
df SS MS F ignificance F
Regressior 1 1.369519 1.369519303 13288.78 7.52E-05
Residual 2 0.000206 0.000103058
Total 3 1.369725
Intercept 9.7545151 0.009261 1053.280549 9.01E-07 9.714668 9.794362
X Variable 1.1239005 0.00975 115.2769762 7.52E-05 1.081952 1.16585

Outlet Device 1 (Orifice)
Diameter of Orifice =
Cd =
Cross Sectional Area =
9=
0.021806 sf
32.2 fUsec2
Stage
Head
Q
(feed
aw)
(QW
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.03
0.00
0.00
0.04
0.00
0.00
0.05
0.00
0.00
0.05
0.00
0.00
0.07
0.00
0.00
0.08
0.00
0.00
0.09
0.01
0.01
0.10
0.02
0.01
0.11
0.03
0.02
0.12
0.04
0.02
0.13
0.05
0.02
0.14
0.06
0.02
0.15
0.07
0.03
0.16
0.08
0.03
0.17
0.09
0.03
0.18
0.10
0.03
0.19
0.11
0.03
0.20
0.12
0.04
0.21
0.13
0.04
0.22
0.14
0.04
0.23
0.15
0.04
0.24
0.16
0.04
0.25
0.17
0.04
0.26
0.18
0.04

Outlet Device 2 (Weir)
Weir Length ==t4;feet
Cw= V ?=, 31
Weir Elevations = M.-MM35lfeet
Stage
Head
Q
kiwi)
l4
IQw
0.00
-1.00
0.00
0.01
-0.99
0.00
0.02
-0.98
0.00
0.03
-0.97
0.00
0.04
-0.96
0.00
0.05
-0.95
0.00
0.06
-0.94
0.00
0.07
-0.93
0.00
0.08
-0.92
0.00
0.09
-0.91
0.00
0.10
-0.90
0.00
0.11
-0.89
0.00
0.12
-0.88
0.00
0.13
-0.87
0.00
0.14
-0.86
0.00
0.15
-0.85
0.00
0.16
-0.84
0.00
0.17
-0.83
0.00
0.18
-0.82
0.00
0.19
-0.81
0.00
0.20
-0.80
0.00
0.21
-0.79
0.00
0.22
-0.78
0.00
0.23
-0.77
0.00
0.24
-0.76
0.00
0.25
-0.75
0.00
0.26
-0.74
0.00
0.27
-0.73
0.00
0.28
-0.72
0.00
0.29
-0.71
0.00
0.30
-0.70
0.00
0.31
-0.69
0.00
Use 3.33 for Sharp, 3,00 for Broad or Free

0.32
-0.68
0.00
0.33
-0.67
0.00
0.34
-0.66
0.00
0.35
-0.65
0.00
0.36
-0.64
0.00
0.37
-0.63
0.00
0.38
-0.62
0.00
0.39
-0.61
0.00
0.40
-0.60
0.00
0.41
-0.59
0.00

Simplified Routing Procedure
Project:
I " «+� -
�Q_ sl_ow3Mein_urial R4adiation Oncology+Pavillion 100 Yr Event
Date:
l?F3/L7/260�;
� ���:
Increment
srl
minutes
(Must be <
15
minutes)
Time
Time
Inflow(cfs)
Inflow
Stored Volume
Stage
Water Surface
Orifice
Outflow
eir
Outflow
Pump
Outflow
Total
Outflow
Total
ttnu)
idaYB.)
(r�w
(4
itf,l
(ft)
Elevation
Outflow
0
0.0
0.00
0.00
(QW
iCW
�Qw
(QW
(M
1
0.0
0.29
17.22
0
0.00
34.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0
2
0.0
1.14
68.14
17
0.00
34.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0
3
0.0
2.51
150.49
85
0.01
34.01
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.01
1
4
0.0
4.34
260.65
235
0.02
34.02
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.02
1
5
0.0
6.56
393.76
495
0.04
34.04
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.02
1
6
0.0
9.07
543.94
887
0.07
34.07
0.03
0.00
0.00
0.03
2
7
0.0
1429
0.11
34.11
0.03
0.00
0.00
0.03
2
8
11.74
704.57
2132
0.16
34.16
0.04
0.00
0.00
0.04
2
0.0
14.48
868.56
2998
0.21
34.21
0.05
0.00
0.00
0.05
9
0.0
17.14
1028.67
4024
0.27
34.27
0.05
0.00
0.00
0.05
3
10
0.0
19.63
1177.84
5198
0.34
34.34
0.06
0.00
0.00
0.06
3
11
0.0
21.82
1309.48
6504
0.42
34.42
0.07
0.00
0.00
0.07
4
12
0.0
23.63
1417.80
7918
0.50
34.50
0.07
0.00
0.00
0.07
4
13
0.0
24.97
1498.00
9411
0.58
34.58
0.08
0.00
0.00
4
14
0.0
25.78
1546.55
10953
0.67
34.67
0.09
0.00
0.00
0.08
0.09
5
15
0.0
26.02
1561.31
12509
0.75
34.75
0.09
0.00
0.00
0.09
5
16
0.0
25.69
1541.63
14045
0.83
34.83
0.10
0.00
0.00
0.10
5
6
17
18
0.0
24.81
1488.37
15528
0.91
34.91
0.10
0.00
0.00
0.10
6
19
0.0
23.40
1403.88
16926
0.98
34.98
0.10
0.00
0.00
0.10
6
20
0.0
21.58
1294.61
18214
1.05
35.05
0.11
0.14
0.00
0.24
15
21
0.0
0.0
19.78
1186.60
19386
1.11
35.11
0.11
0.44
0.00
0.55
33
22
18.13
1087.60
20441
1.16
35.16
0.11
0.80
0.00
0.91
55
23
0.0
16.61
996.86
21383
1.21
35.21
0.12
1.17
0.00
1.28
77
0.0
15.23
913.69
22220
1.25
35.25
0.12
1.53
0.00
1.65
99
24
25
0.0
13.96
837.46
22958
1.29
35.29
0.12
1.88
0.00
2.00
120
0.0
12.79
767.59
23605
1.32
35.32
0.12
2.20
0.00
2.33
140

26
27
0.0
11.73
703.55
24169
1.35
35.35
0.12
2.50
0.00
2.62
157
28
0.0
10.75
644.85
24657
1.38
35.38
0.12
2.76
0.00
2.88
173
29
0.0
9.85
591.05
25075
1.40
35.40
0.12
2.99
0.00
3.12
187
30
0.0
9.03
541.74
25430
1.41
35.41
0.12
3.19
0.00
3.32
199
31
0.0
8.28
496.54
25727
1.43
35.43
0.13
3.37
0.00
3.49
209
32
0.0
7.59
455.11
25973
1.44
35.44
0.13
3.51
0.00
3.64
218
33
0.0
6.95
417.14
26172
1.45
35.45
0.13
3.63
0.00
3.75
225
34
0.0
6.37
382.34
26329
1.46
35.46
0.13
3.72
0.00
3.85
231
35
0.0
5.84
350.44
26449
1.46
35.46
0.13
3.79
0.00
3.92
235
36
0.0
5.35
321.20
26534
1.47
35.47
0.13
3.85
0.00
3.97
238
37
0.0
0.0
4.91
294.40
26591
1.47
35.47
0.13
3.88
0.00
4.01
240
38
4.50
269.84
26620
1.47
35.47
0.13
3.90
0.00
4.02
241
39
0.0
4.12
247.33
26626
1.47
35.47
0.13
3.90
0.00
4.03
242
40
0.0
3.78
226.69
26611
1.47
35.47
0.13
3.89
0.00
4.02
241
41
0.0
3.46
207.78
26577
1.47
35.47
0.13
3.87
0.00
4.00
240
42
0.0
3.17
190.44
26528
1.47
35.47
0.13
3.84
0.00
3.97
238
43
0.0
2.91
174.56
26464
1.46
35.46
0.13
3.80
0.00
3.93
236
44
0.0
2.67
159.99
26389
1.46
35.46
0.13
3.76
0.00
3.88
233
45
0.0
2.44
146.64
26302
1.46
35.46
0.13
3.71
0.00
3.83
230
46
0.0
2.24
134.41
26207
1.45
35.45
0.13
3.65
0.00
3.77
226
47
0.0
2.05
123.20
26103
1.45
35.45
0.13
3.59
0.00
3.71
223
48
0.0
1.88
112.92
25993
1.44
35.44
0.13
3.52
0.00
3.65
219
49
0.0
1.72
103.50
25878
1.44
35.44
0.13
3.45
0.00
3.58
215
0.0
1.58
94.86
25758
1.43
35.43
0.13
3.38
0.00
3.51
211
50
0.0
1.45
86.95
25635
1.42
35.42
0.13
3.31
0.00
3.44
206
51
0.0
1.33
79.69
25508
1.42
35.42
0.13
3.24
0.00
3.36
202
52
0.0
1.22
73.04
25379
1.41
35.41
0.12
3.16
0.00
3.29
197
53
0.0
1.12
66.95
25249
1.40
35.40
0.12
3.09
0.00
3.22
193
54
0.0
1.02
61.36
25117
1.40
35.40
0.12
3.02
0.00
3.14
188
55
0.0
0.94
56.24
24985
1.39
35.39
0.12
2.94
0.00
3.07
184
56
0.0
0.86
51.55
24853
1.39
35.39
0.12
2.87
0.00
2.99
180
57
0.0
0.79
47.25
24720
1.38
35.38
0.12
2.80
0.00
2.92
175
58
0.0
0.72
43.31
24589
1.37
35.37
0.12
2.72
0.00
2.85
171
59
0.0
0.66
39.70
24457
1.37
35.37
0.12
2.65
0.00
2.78
167
60
0.0
0.61
36.38
24327
1.36
3536
0.12
2.58
0.00
2.70
162
61
0.0
0.56
33.35
24198
1.35
35.35
0.12
2.51
0.00
2.64
158

62
63
0.0
0.0
0.51
30.57
24071
1.35
35.35
0.12
2.45
0.00
2.57
154
64
0.0
0.47
28.02
23945
1.34
35.34
0.12
2.38
0.00
2.50
150
65
0.0
0.43
25.68
23820
1.33
35.33
0.12
2.32
0.00
2.44
146
66
0.0
0.39
23.54
23698
1.33
35.33
0.12
2.25
0.00
2.37
142
67
0.0
0.36
21.57
23577
1.32
35.32
0.12
2.19
0.00
2.31
139
68
0.0
0.33
19.77
23458
1.32
35.32
0.12
2.13
0.00
2.25
135
69
0.0
0.30
0.28
18.12
23341
1.31
35.31
0.12
2.07
0.00
2.19
131
70
0.0
0.25
16.61
15.22
23226
1.30
35.30
0.12
2.01
0.00
2.13
128
71
0.0
0.23
13.95
23114
1.30
35.30
0.12
1.96
0.00
2.08
125
72
0.1
0.21
12.79
23003
1.29
35.29
0.12
1.90
0.00
2.02
121
73
0.1
0.20
11.72
22894
1.29
35.29
0.12
1.85
0.00
1.97
118
74
0.1
0.18
10.75
22788
1.28
35.28
0.12
1.80
0.00
1.92
115
75
0.1
0.16
9.85
22683
1.28
35.28
0.12
1.75
0.00
1.87
112
76
0.1
0.15
22581
1.27
35.27
0.12
1.70
0.00
1.82
109
77
0.1
9.03
22481
1.27
35.27
0.12
1.65
0.00
1.77
106
78
0.1
0.14
8.27
22383
1.26
35.26
0.12
1.61
0.00
1.73
104
79
0.1
0.13
7.58
22287
1.26
35.26
0.12
1.57
0.00
1.68
101
80
0.1
0.12
6.95
22193
1.25
35.25
0.12
1.52
0.00
1.64
98
81
0.1
0.11
6.37
22101
1.25
35.25
0.12
1.48
0.00
1.60
96
82
0.1
0.10
5.84
22011
1.24
35.24
0.12
1.44
0.00
1.56
93
83
0.1
0.09
5.35
21923
1.24
35.24
0.12
1.40
0.00
1.52
91
84
0.1
0.08
0.07
4.91
21836
1.23
35.23
0.12
1.36
0.00
1.48
89
85
0.1
4.50
21752
1.23
35.23
0.12
1.33
0.00
1.44
87
86
0.1
0.07
4.12
21670
1.23
35.23
0.12
1.29
0.00
1.41
84
87
0.1
0.06
3.78
21589
1.22
35.22
0.12
1.26
0.00
1.37
82
88
0.1
0.06
3.46
21510
1.22
35.22
0.12
1.22
0.00
1.34
80
89
0.1
0.05
3.17
21433
1.21
35.21
0.12
1.19
0.00
1.31
78
90
0.1
0.05
2.91
21358
1.21
35.21
0.12
1.16
0.00
1.27
76
91
0.1
0.04
2.67
21284
1.21
35.21
0.12
1.13
0.00
1.24
75
92
0.04
2.44
21212
1.20
35.20
0.12
1.10
0.00
1.21
73
93
0.1
0.04
2.24
21141
1.20
35.20
0.11
1.07
0.00
1.18
71
94
0.1
0.03
2.05
21072
1.20
35.20
0.11
1.04
0.00
1.16
69
95
0.1
0.03
1.88
21005
1.19
35.19
0.11
1.01
0.00
1.13
68
96
0.1
0.03
1.72
20939
1.19
35.19
0.11
0.99
0.00
1.10
66
97
0.1
0.1
0.03
1.58
20874
1.19
35.19
0.11
0.96
0.00
1.08
65
0.02
1.45
20811
1.18
35.18
0.11
0.94
0.00
1.05
63

98
99
0.1
0.1
0.02
1.33
20749
1.18
100
0.1
0.02
1.22
20689
1.18
101
0.1
0.02
1.12
20629
1.17
102
0.1
0.02
1.02
20571
1.17
103
0.1
0.02
0.94
20515
1.17
104
0.1
0.01
0.86
20459
1.17
105
0.1
0.01
0.79
20405
1.16
106
0.1
0.01
0.72
20352
1.16
107
01
0.01
0.66
20300
1.16
108
0.1
0.01
0.61
20249
1.15
109
0.1
0.01
0.56
20199
1.15
110
0.1
0.01
0.51
20150
1.15
111
0.1
0.01
0.01
0.47
20102
1.15
112
0.1
0.01
0.43
20055
1.14
113
0.1
0.01
0.39
20010
1.14
114
0.1
0.01
0.36
19965
1.14
115
0.1
0.01
0.33
19
1.14
116
0.1
0.00
0.
19877 77
1.14
11
0.1
0.00
0.28
19835
1.13
118
0.1
0.00
0.25
0.23
19793
1.13
119
0.1
0.00
0.21
19753
1.13
120
0.1
0.00
0.20
19713
1.13
19674
1.13
35.18
0.11
0.91
0.00
1.03
62
35.18
35.17
0.11
0.89
0.00
1.00
60
35.17
0.11
0.11
0.87
0.00
0.98
59
35.17
0.11
0.85
0.83
0.00
0.96
58
35.17
0.11
0.80
0.00
0.94
5
35.16
0.11
0.78
0.00
0.00
0.92
55
35.16
0.11
0.77
0.00
0.90
0.88
54
35.16
0.11
0.75
0.00
0.8
53
52
35.15
0.11
0.73
0.00
0.84
50
35.15
0.11
0.71
0.00
0.82
49
35.15
0.11
0.69
0.00
0.81
48
35.15
0.11
0.68
0.00
0.79
47
35.14
0.11
0.66
0.00
0.77
46
35.14
0.11
0.64
0.00
0.76
45
35.14
0.11
0.63
0.00
0.74
44
35.14
0.11
0.61
0.00
0.73
44
35.14
0.11
0.60
0.00
0.71
43
35.13
0.11
0.58
0.00
0.70
42
35.13
0.11
0.57
0.00
0.68
41
35.13
0.11
0.56
0.00
0.67
40
35.13
0.11
0.54
0.00
0.66
39
35.13
0.11
0.53
0.00
0.64
39

Inflow Hydrograph C= 11-V nQx69 Length W'shed=
(Using Malcolm Step Function) I = k,:: 9z5j in/hr Height W'shed=
Qpeak
tp =
Time Flow (Q)
(min) (cfs)
0 0.00
1 0.29
2 1.14
3 2.51
4 4.34
5 6.56
6 9.07
7 11.74
8 14.48
9 17.14
10 19.63
11 21.82
12 23.63
13 24.97
14 25.78
15 26.02
16 25.69
17 24.81
18 23.40
19 21.58
20 19.78
21 18.13
22 16.61
23 15.23
24 13.96
25 12.79
26 11.73
27 10.75
28 9.85
29 9.03
30 8.28
31 7.59
32 6.95
33 6.37
34 5.84
35 5.35
36 4.91
37 4.50
38 4.12
39 3.78
26.0 cfs
15 minutes
tc= 15

40 3.46
41 3.17
42 2.91
43 2.67
44 2.44
45 2.24
46 2.05
47 1.88
48 1.72
49 1.58
50 1.45
51 1.33
52 1.22
53 1.12
54 1.02
55 0.94
56 0.86
57 0.79
58 0.72
59 0.66
60 0.61
61 0.56
62 0.51
63 0.47
64 0.43
65 0.39
66 0.36
67 0.33
68 0.30
69 0.28
70 0.25
71 0.23
72 0.21
73 0.20
74 0.18
75 0.16
76 0.15
77 0.14
78 0.13
79 0.12
80 0.11
81 0.10
82 0.09
83 0.08
84 0.07
85 0.07
86 0.06
87 0.06
88 0.05
89 0.05

90
0.04
91
0.04
92
0.04
93
0.03
94
0.03
95
0.03
96
0.03
97
0.02
98
0.02
99
0.02
100
0.02
101
0.02
102
0.02
103
0.01
104
0.01
105
0.01
106
0.01
107
0.01
108
0.01
109
0.01
110
0.01
111
0.01
112
0.01
113
0.01
114
0.01
115
0.01
116
0.00
117
0.00
118
0.00
119
0.00
120
0.00

Accum
Z
Volume
Stage Ind 1nZ
Zest Comment
0
0
Contour at Normal Pond (wet pond) or Basin Bottc
17327
1 %760021 ", t ' 0=
1.004911
37220
2 %iN O f5246M0 693,,1;472
1.984151
58939
3 ; 10198426-Yr1t'0986123
2.986716
82536.5
4.030093
108065.5
5 11.59049 1.6094379
5.122162
135578.5
6 11.81731 1.7917595
6.267551 Contour at Berm Top
b = 1.1239005
Ks = 17231.858
Regression Analysis Y Data Range
`` Regression Analysis X Data Range
2 _. k! 9 Y 9
SUMMARY OUTPUT
Regression Statistics
Multiple R 0.9999248
R Square 0.9998495
Adjusted R 0.9997743
Standard E 0.0101518
Observatio 4
ANOVA
of SS MS F ionificance F
Regressior 1 1.369519 1.369519303 13288.78 7.52E-05
Residual 2 0.000206 0.000103058
Total 3 1.369725
Intercept 9.7545151 0.009261 1053.280549 9.01E-07 9.714668 9.794362
X Variable 1.1239005 0.00975 115.2769762 7.52E-05 1.081952 1.16585

Outlet Device 1 (Orifice)
Diameter of Orifice =
Cd =
Cross Sectional Area =
9=
+0 a 6"
6SIaV�
0.021806 sf
32.2 ft/sec2
Stage
Head
Q
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.03
0.00
0.00
0.04
0.00
0.00
0.05
0.00
0.00
0.06
0.00
0.00
0.07
0.00
0.00
0.08
0.00
0.00
0.09
0.01
0.01
0.10
0.02
0.01
0.11
0.03
0.02
0.12
0.04
0.02
0.13
0.05
0.02
0.14
0.06
0.02
0.15
0.07
0.03
0.16
0.08
0.03
0.17
0.09
0.03
0.18
0.10
0.03
0.19
0.11
0.03
0.20
0.12
0.04
0.21
0.13
0.04
0.22
0.14
0.04
0.23
0.15
0.04
0.24
0.16
0.04
0.25
0.17
0.04
0.26
0.18
0.04

Outlet Device 2 (Weir)
Weir Length =
-I' feet
Weir Elevations =
ti�M5 feet
Ak-M
Stage
Head
Q
(fDQ0
(feed
ww
0.00
-1.00
0.00
0.01
-0.99
0.00
0.02
-0.98
0.00
0.03
-0.97
0.00
0.04
-0.96
0.00
0.05
-0.95
0.00
0.06
-0.94
0.00
0.07
-0.93
0.00
0.08
-0.92
0.00
0.09
-0.91
0.00
0.10
-0.90
0.00
0.11
-0.89
0.00
0.12
-0.88
0.00
0.13
-0.87
0.00
0.14
-0.86
0.00
0.15
-0.85
0.00
0.16
-0.84
0.00
0.17
-0.83
0.00
0.18
-0.82
0.00
0.19
-0.81
0.00
0.20
-0.80
0.00
0.21
-0.79
0.00
0.22
-0.78
0.00
0.23
-0.77
0.00
0.24
-0.76
0.00
0.25
-0.75
0.00
0.26
-0.74
0.00
0.27
-0.73
0.00
0.28
-0.72
0.00
0.29
-0.71
0.00
0.30
-0.70
0.00
0.31
-0.69
0.00
Use 3.33 for Sharp, 3,00 for Broad or Free

0.32
-0.68
0.00
0.33
-0.67
0.00
0.34
-0.66
0.00
0.35
-0.65
0.00
0.36
-0.64
0.00
0.37
-0.63
0.00
0.38
-0.62
0.00
0.39
-0.61
0.00
0.40
-0.60
0.00
0.41
-0.59
0.00

i 'lei
• (` + '
�
,�_?`
Y x
r r

UM,021%4e,
<F'.l epw,,
Mun'e �fcM N
Proiect Information
5w$g5o3(�
u�"dFOR°OFFICE`175E ONLYv�
Date Received:
Review Fee: 5
Permit No:
City of Jacksonville L
Application for Stormwater Permit
Date Issued:
Project Name: Onslow Memorial Hospital — Radiation/Oncolocry Pavilion
Project Location: Highway/Street: 317 Western Blvd.
Latitude: 3445.74' Longitude: 7723.12'
Property Owner: Onslow County
Property Owner Address: 512 Mill Ave.. Jacksonville, NC 28540
Property Owner Telephone: [phone]
Deed Book: 390147711041 Page No. 62WO41351 respectively
PIN # 438714427532 Lot Acreage 44.72
Purpose of Development: Residential Q Commercial F--1 Other XQ
Existing Impervious Coverage (acres) 14.99 ac
F—IXHighDensity Low Density
Proposed Impervious Coverage (acres) 15.03 ac
Applicant Information (Owner/Developer)
Business Name(s): Onslow County Hospital Authority
Applicant Name(s): Onslow County Hospital Authority
Address: 241 New River Drive, Jacksonville NC
Telephone: [phone] Fax: n/a
Email Address: n/a
Designer Information (Person to contact regarding questions or revisions to the plan
Company: Crystal Coast Engineering PA
Contact Name: David K. Newsom
Address: 3817-3 Freedom Way Hubert NC
Telephone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
Email Address: crvstalcoasteng()bizec.rr.com
ATTACH PERMIT TO THIS APPLICATION
Stormwater Application Page 1 of 18
March 1, 2009

Permit Holder's Name:Ons/ow County Hospital Authority
Stormwater Permit #:
Permit
SECTION 1. APPROVAL: Having reviewed the application and all supporting materials the City of
Jacksonville has determined that the application is complete, and subject to the conditions imposed
below, and the proposed development meets the requirements of the City's Phase II Stormwater
Ordinance.
SECTION 2. CONDITIONS: Therefore, the above referenced site and land used is hereby approved
and subject to all applicable provisions of the City of Jacksonville Phase II Stormwater Ordinance,
Sections 3 and 4 of this permit, and the following condition(s) which the City of Jacksonville finds
necessary for the proposed development to meet the intent of the ordinance:
This permit shall be valid for a period of two years from the date of issuance unless a valid
building permit has been issued and maintained for the site or the permit has been revoked by
the City of Jacksonville. If, after two years the permitted activity has not begun nor a valid
building permit secured, this permit shall expire.
2. All land purchases and transfers necessary to secure the property for development shall be
completed prior to recordation of this permit.
3. The development of the tract shall proceed in conformity to all plans, design features, and
restrictions submitted as part of the stormwater permit application and kept on file by the City
Planning Department except that the City of Jacksonville's Public Services Director may
approve minor changes to such plans as required by field conditions.
4. The petitioner shall complete all required off -site stormwater improvements and receive
approval from the City for such improvements prior to the release of any certificates of
occupancy.
5. The petitioner shall submit a Floodplain Development Permit Application and receive approval
from the City Planning Department prior to any land disturbance or filling of land located within
Special Flood Hazard Areas.
6. The petitioner shall submit a Sedimentation and Erosion Control Plan Application and receive
approval from the City of Jacksonville prior to any land disturbance or filling of land.
SECTION 3. VESTED RIGHTS. Approval of this permit confers upon the property the right to develop
with the type and intensity of use only as such relates to the requirements of the Phase II stormwater
ordinance and in the manner as herein described and as shown on the approved site plan.
Development of the property, however, shall be subject to any and all future amendments to this
ordinance which do not affect such type and intensity of use and shall proceed in full compliance with
all other applicable local, state and federal regulations.
Stormwater Permit Page 2 of 18
March 1, 2009

Permit Holder's Name:Ons/ow County Hospital Authority
Stormwater Permit #:
SECTION 4. DEED RESTRICTION -PROTECTIVE COVENANT. The following deed restrictions and
protective covenants shall be recorded for all subdivisions, outparcels, and future development prior to
the sale of any lot:
ARTICLE
STORMWATER OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE, EASEMENT AND ACCESS AGREEMENT FOR
STRUCTURAL MANAGEMENT OF BMPS AND ESCROW CONTRIBUTION CONTRACT
1. Definitions. As used within this Maintenance Covenant Section, the following words and terms
have the following definitions.
(a) "Maintain", "Maintenance", "Maintaining" or any similar term used herein is
defined to include one or more of the following, as the context requires: acquisition, purchase,
construction, re -construction, installation, maintenance, inspection, examination, upkeep,
cleaning, renewal, alternation, repair, replacement, repainting, remodeling, restoration, removal,
improvement, administration, operation, use, planting, mowing, cutting, trimming, pruning,
fertilizing, watering and preservation.
(b) "Maintenance Covenant" is defined as this Article.
(c) "Structural BMPs" is defined collectively as the stormwater control structures and
other stormwater structural Best Management Practices (BMPs) and associated appurtenances
and vegetation as stipulated on the approved final plat for said Property.
2. Location and Identification of Structural BMPs. A description of the portions of the Property
where all the Structural BMPs are located, as well as a description of the Property in the
Contract executed between the Association and the City of Jacksonville entitled "City of
Jacksonville's Stormwater Operation, Maintenance, Easement and Access Agreement for
Structural Stormwater Management of BMPs and Escrow Contribution Contract" which has
been registered at the Onslow County Register of Deeds to run with said Property.
3. Maintenance of Structural BMPs. Structural BMPs shall be maintained by the Association in
strict compliance with the Stormwater Ordinance and Agreement. At all times, the Structural
BMPs shall comply with all applicable laws, ordinances, regulations, and rules. Membership in
the Association is mandatory for each Owner of a Lot with membership being appurtenant to the
Lot and running with ownership of the Lot. The Association or its Board of Directors shall levy
assessments for the costs and expenses of maintaining the Structural BMPs in further
compliance with the City of Jacksonville Stormwater Ordinance and Agreement. Upon
compliance with the provisions of Chapter 47F of the North Carolina General Statutes (or any
applicable successor provision), all assessments levied against a Lot that remain unpaid for a
period of thirty (30) days or longer shall constitute a lien on that Lot.
Stormwater Permit Page 3 of 18
March 1, 2009

Permit Holder's Name:Onslow County Hospital Authority
Stormwater Permit #:
4. Association Costs and Expenses for Maintenance of Structural BMPs The costs and expenses
of maintaining the Structural BMPs shall be a common expense of the Association and shall
include, without limitation, all contribution payment obligations owed to the City of Jacksonville
under a Stormwater Agreement covering the Property.
5. Establishment of an Escrow Account. The initial construction cost for the Structural BMP will be
used to establish the level to which the escrow account will be funded. The sinking fund budget
is established in the Stormwater Maintenance Agreement. Any funds drawn down from the
escrow account shall be replaced in accordance with the schedule of contributions specified by
the City of Jacksonville prior to the withdrawal of said funds.
6. Penalties Associated with Failure to Maintain Structural BMPs Operation and Maintenance of
the Structural BMPs must comply with all relevant provisions of the Ordinance, as may be
amended from time to time, and the Operation and Maintenance Agreement. Failure to
maintain the Structural BMPs is a violation of the Ordinance and may subject each Lot Owner to
significant daily civil penalties and other enforcement actions by the City of Jacksonville.
7. Grant of Easement. Association hereby dedicates, bargains, sells, grants, and conveys unto
the City of Jacksonville, its successors and assigns, a perpetual, non-exclusive and irrevocable
right and easement over, under, through, and across the Stormwater Areas and access through
the Property to and from the Stormwater Areas for the purpose of permitting City inspection and,
if deemed necessary, as determined by the City, maintenance, replacement, reconstruction, and
repair of the Structural BMPs.
8. Joint and Several Liability. Each Owner shall be jointly and severally responsible for
maintenance and operation of the Structural BMPs, including payment of any unpaid expenses
related to the maintenance of the Structural BMPs and including all interest charges thereon,
together with the costs and expenses of collection incurred, including court costs and
reasonable attorneys' fees actually incurred.
9. Action for Specific Performance. Recognizing the consequences to the City of Jacksonville of
non-compliance with the obligations of this Maintenance Covenant, Association hereby grants
the City of Jacksonville the right to seek, in any court of appropriate jurisdiction, judicial action
for specific performance of any of the obligations established within this Maintenance Covenant.
This right of the City shall not limit any other remedies or enforcement options available to the
City under the Ordinance, any other applicable law, or the Stormwater Agreement.
SECTION 5. SEVERABILITY. Invalidation of any one or more of the conditions set forth herein shall
not adversely affect the balance of said conditions, which shall remain in full force and effect.
Stormwater Permit Page 4 of 18
March 1, 2009

Permit Holder's Name:Ons/ow County Hospital Authority
Stormwater Permit #:
City Manager
NORTH CAROLINA
ONSLOW COUNTY
that
Date
a Notary Public of the aforesaid County and State, certify
ersonally appeared before me and acknowledged that he
is the City Manager for the City of Jacksonville, North Carolina and pursuant to authority duly given,
and as an act of the City; he executed this Agreement for the purpose herein expressed.
WITNESS my hand and Notarial Seal this the _ day of , 20
NOTARY PUBLIC
My Commission Expires:
SEAL
(Seal)
Stomwater Permit Page 5 of 18
March 1, 2009

Permit Holder's Name:
Stormwater Permit #:
I, Daniel T.-Waller, SRVP Support Services For The Onslow County Hospital Authority
subject property, do hereby acknowledge receipt of this Stormwater Permit and agree to he conditions
stated within. I further acknowledge that no work may be done pursuant to this Permit except in
accordance with all of the conditions and requirements listed and that these conditions and
requirements shall be binding upon me and my successors in interest and shall run with the land in
perpetuity.
Owner Name
NORTH CAROLINA
ONSLOW COUNTY
,a Notary Public, do hereby certify that _
[owner Name(s)] personally appeared
before me this day and acknowledged that [he/she/they] [is/are] the owner(s) of [address]
WITNESS my hand and Notarial Seal this the 21 day of
(Seal)
*OTARYUBLIC
��4 My Commission Expires:' 3FL Gy
0
a-
p M SERL.
=z
cp
GeCIC c
Stormwater Permit COUNT
Stormwater
March t. 2009
Page 35 of 49

.�:� •I,�
4
��
� }'� `�J
.: � � � �
O � S a
c, ? �
;., �G .
�. �..
'�ir�,tiit�'iltl;';�

Instrument Prepared By:
Brief Description for Index:
Parcel Identifier:
Mail After Recording To:
City of Jacksonville Attorney's Office
City Attorney's Office
PO Box 128
Jacksonville, NC 28541
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
COUNTY OF ONSLOW
CITY OF JACKSONVILLE'S STORMWATER OPERATION, MAINTENANCE, EASEMENT
AND ACCESS AGREEMENT FOR STRUCTURAL STORMWATER MANAGEMENT OF
BMPS
THE CITY OF JACKSONVILLE'S STORMWATER OPERATION, MAINTENANCE,
EASEMENT AND ACCESS AGREEMENT FOR STRUCTURAL STORMWATER MANAGEMENT
OF BMPS (the "Agreement") made this day of
20
, by and between Onslow County Hospital Authority , whose address and telephone
number are 241 New River Drive Jacksonville N. C 28541, (hereinafter referred to as "Developer")
with, to and for the benefit of the CITY OF JACKSONVILLE, a municipal corporation of the State of
North Carolina, whose address is PO Box 128, Jacksonville, North Carolina 28541 (hereinafter referred
to as the "City"). Developer, or any subsequent successors and assigns are herein referred to
collectively as the "Owners" and individually as "Owner".

WITNESSETH
WHEREAS, the City, under various state and federal laws, is required to regulate the
maintenance of Structural BMPs (as defined herein) constructed to serve new or re -development within
the City's planning jurisdiction to ensure that, following initial construction, the Structural BMPs are
operated, maintained, and to the extent necessary, repaired in accordance with applicable state and
federal laws; and
WHEREAS, the City may be subject to substantial regulatory and financial penalties from the
State of North Carolina and the federal government if the above -referenced rules and regulations are not
applied to new or re -developments occurring within the planning jurisdiction of the City; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Jacksonville has determined that, to maintain the
City of Jacksonville's compliance under applicable state and federal regulations, certain obligations are
to be met by Developers and subsequent owners of Structural BMPs; and
WHEREAS, Developer is the owner in fee simple of that certain "Property" situated in Onslow
County, North Carolina and more particularly described on Exhibit A; and
WHEREAS, the Property is located within the planning jurisdiction of the City and subject to
certain stormwater standards set forth in Jacksonville City Ordinance 2009-07 (the "Ordinance"), as may
be amended from time to time; and
WHEREAS, the Developer has submitted construction drawings depicting the Stormwater Area
and Structural BMPs (both herein defined), for the purpose of establishing a stormwater management
system for the Property, and
WHEREAS, these Structural BMPs are required to comply with the Ordinance and that failure to
maintain the Structural BMPs is a violation of the Ordinance potentially subjecting each lot owner of the
Property to significant daily civil penalties and other enforcement actions; and
WHEREAS, the City also requires that the Developer grant or dedicate to the City an access and
maintenance easement over and across the Property and Stormwater Areas for the purpose of inspecting,
maintaining, repairing, reconstructing and replacing the Structural BMPs set forth in the Ordinance and
this Agreement; and
WHEREAS, this Agreement has been procured in accordance with the requirements of N.C.
General Statutes Chapter 143, Article 21, Part I and Jacksonville City Ordinance 2009-07.
NOW, THEREFORE, for a valuable consideration, including benefits Developer may derive
there from, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, the Owner and City hereby agree as follows:
1. RECITALS. The foregoing recitals shall constitute an integral part of this Agreement,
and this Agreement shall be incorporated herein and made a part thereof.
2. PROPERTY. As required by the City in connection with the development of this
Property, the Developer shall install engineered stormwater control structures and other stormwater
structural Best Management Practices (BMPs) and associated appurtenances and vegetation

(collectively, the "Structural BMPs") as shown on the construction drawings prepared by John L. Pierce
& Associates/Crystal Coast Engineering PA, entitled Radiation/Oncology Pavilion and dated
March 9 2009 on portion of Property as described in Exhibit B (the "Stormwater Areas"), for
purposed of establishing a stormwater management system for the Property, and that Developer assumes
specific maintenance, replacement, reconstruction and repair, responsibilities set forth in the Ordinance
and with respect to the Structural BMPs; and
3. GRANT OF EASEMENT. Developer hereby dedicate, bargain, sell, grant, and convey
unto the City, its successors and assigns, a perpetual, non-exclusive and irrevocable right and easement
over, under, through, and across the Stormwater Areas and access through the Property to and from the
Stormwater Areas for the purpose of permitting City inspection and, if deemed necessary, as determined
by the City, maintenance, replacement, reconstruction, and repair of the Structural BMPs, as more fully
set forth herein and in the Ordinance (the "Protection Easement"). Said easement shall be clearly
identified and labeled on the approved final plat for Property. Said easements shall be permanent and
shall run with the land.
4. CONSTRUCTION AND MAINTENANCE STORMWATER MANAGEMENT
FACILITIES. The Developer shall be responsible for the construction of the Stormwater BMPs; and
prior to conveying control of the Stormwater Area, their appurtenances and vegetation to another Owner
by deed or easement, the Developer will be responsible for maintenance, repair, reconstruction, and
replacement thereof in the manner specified herein and in strict compliance with the Stormwater
Ordinance 2009-07 which is incorporated herein by reference and made a part thereof (the
"Ordinance"). At all times, the Stormwater BMPs shall perform as designed and shall at all times
comply with all applicable laws, ordinances, regulations, rules and directives of governmental
authorities.
5. OWNERSHIP AND/OR TRANSFER OF PROPERTY AND STORMWATER AREAS.
Developer agrees that it shall not transfer ownership and/or control of the Structural BMPs until
construction has been completed in accordance with the Stormwater Permit, as defined in the Ordinance,
approved Stormwater Areas and Structural BMPs plans, and the City hasinspected and approved the
same. In addition, the Developer and any new Owner must request that the Permit for the Structural
BMPs be reissued to any subsequent Owner.
The Developer agrees that it shall not transfer, convey, assign or otherwise relinquish or release
its responsibility for the operation and maintenance of its Structural BMPs until a Permit has been issued
to Developer's successor, or new owner at which time Developer shall be released from any obligations
hereunder arising from events or circumstances occurring after the date the Structural BMPs is
transferred and the Permit is reissued to the new Owner of the Property; and
6. INSPECTION. The Developer, its successors and assigns, shall ensure that the Structural
BMPs are inspected by one of the following professional services: Qualified Registered North Carolina
Professional engineer, surveyor, landscape architect, soil scientist, aquatic biologist, or person certified
by the North Carolina Cooperative Extension Service for Stormwater treatment practice inspection and
maintenance (the "Professional"). The Professional shall submit an annual inspection report, a copy
attached hereto as Exhibit C, which may be amended from time to time, to the City. The inspection
report shall be due annually 30 days from the date of the final structural stormwater BMP construction
inspection approval by the City. The inspection shall cover the entire Stormwater Area as well as any
Structural BMPs.

7. USE OF PROTECTION EASEMENT. The City, its officers, employees, contractors and
agents may access the Property and enter the Stormwater Areas for purposes of exercising City's rights
hereunder. This Agreement shall in no way obligate the City to maintain, replace, reconstruct and repair
the Structural BMPs, and the City shall not be liable to any person, firm, partnership, company,
corporation, governmental agency, or entity for the condition or operation of the Structural BMPs.
Further, this Agreement shall in no way diminish, limit, or restrict the right of the City to enforce any of
its ordinances as permitted by law.
8. DEFAULT. If the Developer, or subsequent Owners shall fail to comply with the
foregoing requirements or any other obligations imposed herein, in the Ordinance as the same may be
amended from time to time, the City, in its sole discretion, may perform such work and recover the costs
thereof from the person who is then responsible for the performance of such requirements and
obligations provided, however, that, except in cases of emergencies, the City will give the Owner
written notification of deadline for correcting the violation and an opportunity to cure the Owner's
default hereunder. If the City exercises its right hereunder and maintains, repairs, reconstructs or
replaces all or a portion of the Structural BMPs, then following acceptance and payment of the work, the
City shall deliver to the Owner written notice of the costs of such work, and the Owner shall pay all such
costs within forty-five (45) days after receipt of such notice.. Any costs not paid by the Owner to the
City within the forty-five (45) day period shall be delinquent, and the Owner shall be considered in
default of this Agreement. In the event of such default, the City may either bring an action at law
against the Owner for the cost of the work, plus interest at the rate of eight percent (8%) per annum,
collection costs, and reasonable attorney fees, or foreclose a lien against the Property, or both.
Any payment required by this Agreement which is not paid to the City within thirty (30) days
after its due date shall be delinquent. In the event of such default, the City may bring an action against
the Owner for nonpayment plus interest at a rate of eight percent (8%) per year, collection costs, a late
payment charge of three hundred dollars ($300) during the first forty five (45) days of default and five
hundred dollars ($500) thereafter and reasonable attorneys' fees.
The remedies set forth herein are cumulative; the City may, for example, bring an action for
collection and foreclose its lien claim.
9. RESERVATION BY RECORD OWNER. The Developer and its successors and assigns
shall in all other respects remain the owner of the Property, subject to the Protection Easement, and may
make all lawful uses of the Property not inconsistent therewith.
10. NO WAIVER OF RIGHT. The City does not waive or forfeit the right to take action to
ensure compliance with the terms, conditions and purposes of this Agreement by a prior failure to act.
11. NOTICE. Written notice as required hereunder shall be provided to the City Manager of
the City of Jacksonville at PO Box 128, Jacksonville, NC 28541, and to the Owner at Onslow
County Hospital Authority, 241 New River Drive Jacksonville NC 28541.
Written notice shall be deemed received four (4) days following its deposit, first class mail, with the
United States postal system. In the event notice to the Owner is returned, the City may notify the Owner
at the mailing address provided by the Onslow County Tax Assessor.

12. SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS. The designation of Developer and Owner shall include
the heirs, assigns, and successors to the Developer and Owner. The designation of City shall include the
assigns and successors to the City.
13. TERM. This Agreement shall continue as a servitude running in perpetuity with the
Property.
14. CONTROLLING LAW. This Agreement is to be governed by the laws of the State of
North Carolina. Any and all applicable laws, rules, and regulations, ordinances, codes, and orders of any
and all governmental bodies, agencies, authorities, and courts will be construed pursuant to the laws of
the State of North Carolina. All claims and disputes arising from any contract shall be construed
pursuant to the laws of the State of North Carolina. The State of North Carolina is the proper jurisdiction
for all claims and disputes arising under any contract and the proper venue is the Onslow County
Superior Court.
15. INDEMNIFICATION. Developer and successors and assigns agree to protect, defend,
indemnify and hold the City, its officers, employees and agents free and harmless from and against any
losses, penalties, damages, settlements, costs, charges, professional fees or other expenses or liabilities in
connection with or arising out of this Agreement and/or the performance hereof that are due to the
negligent acts of the Developer, its officers, employees, or agents.
TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the aforesaid rights, privileges and easements herein to the City, its
successors and assigns forever, and Developer does covenant that Developer are seized of said premises
in fee or by easement and have the right to convey the same, the Developer will warrant and defend such
title to the same against claims of all persons whosoever.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Developer and City have executed this Agreement and under seal
as of the day and year first above written.
DEVELOPER:
0&Q1w County Hospital Authori
By: z �� - ji2/ ' (SEAL)
Name: / • Gfi�'�Fc f�✓f'
Its: -9Ck1l �.eu�crrr (Title)

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
COUNTY OF u
1, the undersigned Notary Public, certify
personally came before me this day and acknow
of S�
DEVELOPER
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
-pGv1.G1 -V. �&)_G\ e
(edged he/she is the (title) Scn:o r ``
SLlO.LeS Cc,( Oncl6J cowyJ l�P:%s, iAswo':Xy
(name of entity) a (circle one) corporation, limited liability company, general partnership and the he/she
as such officer being authorized to do so executed the foregoing instrument on behalf of said entity.
WITNESS my hand and official stamp seal this the 1,_ day of !1_ Ot . ` 20001.
(SEf �aa NOTAq` 9`
N A&SLIG
04,r001U tt, 0����`\
otary Pu lic
My Commission Expires: 1nr. . 15 ZU�3

CITY OF JACKSONVILLE:
By: (SEAL)
Name: Kristoff T. Bauer
Its: City Manager (Title)
ATTEST:
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
COUNTY OF ONSLOW
This is to certify that on the day of
City Clerk
CITY MANAGER
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
20 , before me
personally came , with whom I am personally
acquainted, who, being by me duly swom, says that she is the City Clerk and Kristoff T. Bauer is the
City Manager of the City of Jacksonville, the municipal corporation described in and which executed the
foregoing; that she knows the corporate seal of said municipal corporation; that the seal affixed to the
foregoing instrument is said corporate seal, and the name of the municipal corporation was subscribed
thereto by the said City Clerk and that the said corporate seal was affixed, all by order of the governing
body of said municipal corporation, and that the said instrument is the act and deed of said municipal
corporation.
WITNESS my hand and official stamp seal this the day of , 20
(SEAL) Notary Public
My Commission Expires:
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
City Attorney
Date

CITY OF JACKSONVILLE
Checklist for Stormwater Standards
Plan Requirements (Indicate "NIA" where appropriate):
Yes , I
No 1
N/A I
Sheet No. I Description
Remarks
❑
❑
Development Name
9/
❑
❑
Owner
/
❑
❑
Design Firm
0
❑
Sealed, Signed and Dated
❑
❑
Sheet Number
❑
❑
Date
❑
0
Revision Numbers and Dates along with
a list of all revisions made
❑
❑
Designer's Certification
❑
❑
Owner's/Developer's Certification
qJ
❑
❑
North Arrow
Q/
❑
❑
Property Lines
'-/
❑
❑
Legend
❑
❑
Vicinity Map Rfroject
❑
ElScale
(min at T•=50-
❑
❑
General Descriptio
❑
❑
❑
General Description of Erosion Controls
G✓
❑
0
❑
General Description of Stormwater
Management Facilities
&e-T-7o
0
❑
Project Schedule, Narrative, Sequence
/
of Construction
❑
❑
Adjacent Property Owners
❑
0
Existing Streets, Buildings, etc.
❑
❑
Wooded Limits
0
❑
❑
Wetland Limits
❑
❑
❑
Water Quality Buffers
0
0
❑
Proposed Public Drainage Easements
/
shown
/ff�
❑
❑
Land Use of Surrounding Areas
❑
❑
Original Contours (2-toot intervals)
❑
❑
❑
Proposed contours (2-foot intervals) or
/
sufficient number of spot elevations
C7at/G A�i_
❑
❑
Actual Field Survey
/
❑
❑
City/USGS Topographical Data
12
❑
❑
Existing Streams, Lakes, etc.
V
❑
❑
Size and Location of Existing Culverts
v//
❑
❑
❑
❑
Size and Location of Proposed Culverts
Limits of Drainage Area
Z/
❑
❑
Limits of Construction, Clearing &
Grading
Checklist for Stormwater standards Page 36 of 49
March 1, 2009

0
❑
Existing & Proposed Improvements
(including utilities and protective measures)
D ❑
Delineation of FEMA 100-yr Floodplain
w/i 200 feet of project, 100 year BFE
shown
/
0, ❑
❑
Location and elevation of the lowest
floor in all proposed and existing
buildings
❑
❑
Location of Stormwater Management
Facilities (includes details, plan, profile, and
cross sections)
❑
❑
Maintenance plan for stormwater
management facilities
7
Timsng44/f f
❑
❑
Submitting 7 Set Plans
of
Calculation Requirements
Note: Drainage
structures should be designed to handle all upstream
flow when the basin is
fully built out.
Yes No
N/A Sheet No.
Description
Remarks
Kr ❑
❑
Development Name
❑
0
Owner
] / ❑
❑
Design Firm
y
❑
❑
Sealed, Signed and Dated
❑
D
Capacity of receiving channel
downstream of channel, pipe or basin
system
�j.�/
Ado o/rrLLy f�
0
D
Total area, impervious area, CN, Tc,
QPre and, Q.st for 10-year/25-year/100-
/
year storms as applicable
❑
7
25-year (where required) flows at cross -
street drainage structures
7/ ❑
❑
10-year and 100-year flood routing
analysis through all detention/retention
facilities
❑ ❑
Design flows and velocities in open
channels
❑
^/
4J
Quality control computations
❑ ❑
Soils/Geotechnical Report/Analysis (for
/
infiltration facilities)
0
0
Submit 2 Sets of Calculations
Piped Systems*: (For Residential
Streets) !y I&
f_es I No I N/A I
De cripti n
Remarks
Li ❑
❑
Analyzed and designed for 10-yr Storm
❑
❑
Designed for 25-year (where required)
flows at cross -street drainage structures
❑
❑
Minimum Velocity = 2.5 FPS
❑
0
Headwall or Flared End Sections
❑ ❑
D
Energy Dissipater Calculations
checklist for Stormwater Standards Page 37 of 49
March 1. 2009

❑ ❑ ❑ Capacity of receiving channel
downstream of channel or pipe system
❑ ❑ Gutter spread limited to '/2 lane width
from the face of the curb, for a rainfall
igt��ty of 4 inches per hour
oen Channel Svstems- �� �-#—
❑
❑
Capacity analyzed and designed for 10-
yr Storm
❑
❑
Lining Designed for 2-yr Storm
❑
❑
Side Slopes 3 to 1 or flatter
❑ ❑
❑
Minimum Bottom Width = 3 Feet
❑ ❑
❑
Velocity Check (Liners provided, I needed)
❑
❑
Capacity of receiving downstream
channel
Other Plan Submittals:
The following permits or items may need to be considered by the designer. Check off those that are
applicable to this project. All below shaded items are to be submitted to the City. Other items shall be
Slltlmiit}Prt Itnnn rannact nnhi
❑
❑
Maintenance plan for all stormwater
/
facilities
❑
❑
Landscaping details for stormwater
management BMP's
�j
❑
❑
Name and address of entity responsible
❑
❑
for maintenance
Submit Erosion & Sedimentation Control
Plan to City of Jacksonville
❑
❑
er/
Submit permits to NCDOT for
encroachments and driveways
❑
❑
US Army Corps of Engineers 404
permits
❑
Comply with water supply watershed
protection ordinance
❑
Complete survey of threatened or
endangered species
❑
NCDENR, Water Quality permits
Contact Public Services Director for requirements if other than Residential Streets.
Comments:
MQVr-e1C4!fA0a 70 EW6710(
Checklist for Stormwater Standards Page 38 of 49
March 1, 2009

Submittal Worksheet for Dry Detention, Wet Retention, Extended Detention Wetland Basins, and other
BMP Facilities:
The City of Jacksonville will follow the City Code and the North Carolina Department of
Environment and Natural Resources, Division of Water Quality Stormwater Site Planning
Guidance Manual and the Stormwater Best management Practices Handbook with regard to
Dry Detention, Wet Retention Basin, Extended Detention Wetland Basins and other BMP's
within the City's jurisdiction. Please provide complete documentation and details where
applicable. A complete stormwater management plan submittal includes a worksheet for each
basin, design calculations, plan and specifications showing all basin and outlet structure
details, and a fully executed operation and maintenance agreement. An incomplete submittal
package will result in a request for additional information and will substantially delay final
review and approval of the project. Indicate "Not Applicable" where appropriate if design is a
dry detention basin.
I. Project Information (please complete the following information):
Project Name: Onslow Memorial Hospital — Radiation/Oncology Pavilion
For projects with multiple basins, specify which basin this worksheet applies to
Basin Bottom Elevation
27.00
ft.
(average elevation of the floor of the
basin)
Permanent Pool Elevation
34.00
ft.
(elevation of the orifice invert out)
Temporary Pool Elevation
35.00
ft.
(elevation of the outlet structure invert in)
Permanent Pool Surface
15661
s ft.
(water surface area at permanent pool
Area
,
q'
elevation)
Drainage Area
3.97
ac.
(on -site and off -site drainage to the basin)
Impervious Area
3.29
ac.
(on -site and off -site drainage to the basin)
Permanent Pool Volume 51,082 cu. ft. (combined volume of main basin and
forebay)
Temporary Pool Volume 17,327 cu. ft. (volume detained on top of the permanent
pool)
Forebay Volume 10,618 cu. ft. (volume detained on top of the forebay
pool)
SA/DA used 9.01 (surface area to drainage area ratio)
Diameter of Orifice and 1 2„ (draw down orifice diameter and number
Number of)
Submittal Worksheet Page 10 of 18
March 1, 2009

II. Required Items Checklist
The following checklist outlines design requirements per the North Carolina Stormwater Best
Management Practices Handbook (NCDENR, Division of Water Quality, April, 1999). Initial in
the space provided to indicate the following design requirements have been met and
supporting documentation is attached. If a requirement has not been met, attach an
explanation of why.
Applicant's
Initials Dry Detention Basin (standarddetail 640:01j
Impervious areas used for sizing is based on expected final build out of the
development and any offsite runoff that drains to the pond.
The basin length to width ratio is 3:1 or greater or correctly spaced baffles
D441 placed to lengthen the flow path between the inlet and outlet.
A 20-foot vegetation buffer to the maximum surface water elevation is
provided.
Flood control goal: Pond outflow from principle outlet structure must not
exceed the 10-year storm pre -development flow. or 25 year storm in areas
with a history of localized flooding problems.
Basin side slopes are no steeper than 3:1.
Emergency spillway safely passes the 100-year storm with velocity less than 3
fps across stabilized spillway designed per NCDENR regulations with a
minimum of a 1-foot freeboard.
The basin designed using 2-yr Storm for channel adequacy.
The storage for flood control located above the temporary storage pool.
Outlet structure checked for buoyancy.
Splitter plate and trash rack provided on principle outlet structure.
Anti -seep collar on outlet pipe
Access is provided for maintenance
Design checked an certified f9r s)ructural int Drity a d floodplain impacts for
the 100-yr StormQarc yvgYiP/ �
A site specific operation anr�aintenance (O&M) plan is provided
lkjr�i✓�20.t�/
A vegetation management/mowing schedule is provided in the O&M plan'
A debris check is specified in the O&M plan after every storm event 116
Semi-annual inspections are specified in the O&M plan Y
The Operation & Maintenance checklist is specified in the O&M plan to be
performed after every storm event. 11`�
A responsible party is designated in the O&M plan
Submittal Worksheet
March 1, 2009
Page 40 of 49

Applica'nYs Wet Detention Ponds
Initials; ; (itefns to,,be,added to Dry Detention.�oondT:requirernents,to yield a Wet
Detention Pond)
SA/DA is based on minimum 8fr% TSS removal (based on Coastal Counties
'P&I Tables). a(9
The temporary pool, located above the permanent pool, sized to detain the
runoff volume from the 15f inch aPr�ngf ("first flush"). The 1"inch draws down
f�(/J/j/ in a minimum of 2 to 5 days. CC
Minimum perrnent water quality pool depth is 3 to 6 feet with minimum of 3
feet. AvZ, = & 2L
The forebay volume is approximately equal to a minimum of 20% of the total
basin volume 20,8�0
_ f7lti/ Sediment storage is provided in the permanent pool
/The storage for flood control located above both the permanent and temporary
(1st inch of runoff) water quality pools.
A submerged and vegetated 10' wide perimeter shelf provided (below the
normal pool elevation) at a slope not exceeding 6:1. Inward from edge of
shelf, basin side slopes are no steeper than 3:1
An emergency basin drain with cdate—vafve ispLp&ided to drain the basin
_ sufficient to drain the pond in 24 hours for riser repairs and sediment removal.
A minimum 30-foot vegetated filter is provided at the outlet
(� A specific sediment
� clean -out be chmark7 is listed (eleva�on or depth) in the
O&M plan p'CI At
&W04 M C)o
Applicarit:s - Extended Detention Wetlands (standard. detai1:640Q.0); I �/
Initials (additionalite'ms applicable-foExtended'Detention=WetlandBasins)
Determine the surface areas of the pond using 3 foot depth (this does not
mean the pool depth will be 3 feet deep! It is for pool area computation only)
70% of pool area is designed as a marsh with a depth of 0 to 18" with an
almost equal distribution of area (35% and 35%) between 0 to 9" and 9" to
18"
A small pool (15% of the surface area) is located at the outlet to prevent
sediment form interfering with the outlet structure functions.
15% forebay
Plant specification and installation of plants shown (it is not necessary to plant
cattails as they will volunteer on their own).
Contour pond using 0.5 foot contours.
The shelf from the normal pool elevation contour inward needs to be 6:1 on
the perimeter only. Once away from the shelf areas, contours can vary as
desired. Minimum shelf width = 10 feet.
Submittal Worksheet Page 41 of 49
March 1, 2009

Permit Application and Plan Submittals
Approval of Stormwater Management Plans and Calculations by the City of Jacksonville does not
complete the City of Jacksonville review process. All other applicable City Departments, State, and
Federal agencies must also approve the plan as warranted. It shall be the sole responsibility of the
Owner/Developer/Designer to acquire all applicable approvals.
SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS
Four original permit applications, including checklist, four complete sets of site plan drawings and
four complete sets of calculations shall be submitted to the City of Jacksonville. The following
certifications shall appear on the first Stormwater Management sheet in the plan set.
DESIGNER'S CERTIFICATION
hereby certify that, to the best of my ability, this plan has been prepared in
,ordance with the latest City of Jacksonville Manual of Specifications and
mdard Details and City Code."
Signature:_ 1�
Printed Name and Title:John L. Pierce, P.L.S.
Date: 4/2/09 Registration Number:L-2596
OWNER'S/DEVELOPER'S CERTIFICATION
"I/We hereby certify that all site construction, drainage and grading will be done
pursuant to this plan and that the applicable Stormwater Management conditions and
requirements of the City of Jackso 'Ile, the State of North Carolina and the Federal
Government and its agencies ar a by a pa 1 is plan."
Signature:
Printed Name: Daniel T_ Waller
SRVP
tal Authority
Permit Application and Plan Submittals
March 1, 2009 Page 29 of 49

-MULKEY
ENGINEERS & CONSULTANTS
July 30, 2008
Edward Beck
Regional Supervisor
Surface Water Protection Section
Division of Water Quality
127 Cardinal Drive Extension
Wilmington, NC 28405
Re: Stonnwater Pernvt No. SW8 950317 Modification
ER & Surgical Services Pavilion - Onslow Memorial Hospital
Dear Mr. Beck:
Mulkey Engineers & Consultants has periodically Visited the project site and hereby certify that the
permitted facility has been installed in accordance with the permit and the approved plans. I have
enclosed the designer's certification for your files.
If Von have any questions please do not hesitate to call.
Sincerely,
2le}'1 t order, P.E.
Project Manager
SJF
Attachments:
7/30/08 Designer's Certification
.�CEaVEI�
AUG 0 1 2008
gY:
MULKEY. INC. 4I6 [AY=EVIu[ 9m[[i MALL Runart NC 27601 PQ Boz 33129 RALU.., INC 27636 PH. 919-836 4800 FAY: 919-836-4801 w .uuLKE"NC-Corn