20160366 Ver 1_Year 4 Monitoring Report_2021_20211203

ID#* 20160366
Select Reviewer:
Erin Davis
Initial Review Completed Date 12/03/2021
Mitigation Project Submittal - 12/3/2021
Version* 1
Is this a Prospectus, Technical Proposal or a New Site?*
Type of Mitigation Project:*
Stream Wetlands Buffer Nutrient Offset
(Select all that apply)
Project Contact Information
Contact Name:*
Jeremiah Dow
Project Information
ID#:* 20160366
Existing ID#
Project Type: • DMS Mitigation Bank
Project Name: Martin Dairy Mitigation Site
County: Orange
Document Information
O Yes O No
Email Address:*
[e-mail]
Version:* 1
Existing Version
Mitigation Document Type:*
Mitigation Monitoring Report
File Upload: Martin Dairy_97087_MY4_2021.pdf 5.29MB
Please upload only one PDF of the complete file that needs to be submitted...
Signature
Print Name:* Jeremiah Dow
Signature: *

ai&
MONITORING YEAR 4
ANNUAL REPORT
FINAL
MARTIN DAIRY MITIGATION SITE
Orange County, NC
NCDEQ Contract No. 006831
DMS Project No. 97087
USACE Action ID No. 2016-00874
NCDWR Project No. 2016-0366
Data Collection Period: January- October 2021
Draft Submission Date: November 2021
Final Submission Date: November 23, 2021
PREPARED FOR:
NC Department of Environmental Quality
Division of Mitigation Services
1652 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1652

PREPARED BY:
W
WILDLANDS
ENCI N E E R I N G
Wildlands Engineering, Inc.
312 West Millbrook Road, Suite 225
Raleigh, NC 27609
Jason Lorch
[e-mail]
Phone: [phone]
Martin Dairy Mitigation Site
Monitoring Year 4 Annual Report — FINAL

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Wildlands Engineering, Inc. (Wildlands) implemented a full delivery project at the Martin Dairy
Mitigation Site (Site) for the North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality Division of Mitigation
Services (DMS) to restore a total of 2,135 linear feet (LF) of perennial streams in Orange County, NC. The
Site is expected to generate 2,135 stream credits. All stream lengths were measured along the stream
centerline for stream credit calculations. The Site is located approximately eight miles northeast of
Hillsborough, NC and eight miles south of Caldwell, NC (Figure 1) in the Neuse River Basin 8-Digit
Hydrologic Unit Code 03020201. The project is located within the Neuse River Basin Hydrologic Unit
Code 03020201030030 and NC Division of Water Resources (DWR) Subbasin 03-04-01. There are two
unnamed streams on the Site, Martin Dairy Creek and UT1 with a downstream drainage area of 526
acres. The Site drains to the Eno River which flows to Falls Lake and is classified as water supply waters
(WS-IV). The 11.155-acre Site is protected with a permanent conservation easement.
The Site is located within the Neuse River Targeted Local Watershed as presented in the 2010 Neuse
River Basin Restoration Priorities (RBRP) (Breeding, 2010), which highlights the importance of riparian
buffers for stream restoration projects. The Site was an active dairy farm until 2014 when livestock were
removed.
The project goals established in the Mitigation Plan (Wildlands, 2017) were developed considering the
goals and objectives listed in the Neuse River RBRP plan. The project goals include:
• Reconnect channels with floodplains and riparian wetlands to allow a natural flooding regime;
• Improve the stability of stream channels;
• Restore and enhance native floodplain and streambank vegetation;
• Improve instream habitat; and
• Permanently protect the Site from harmful land uses.
The project will contribute to achieving the goals for the watershed listed in the Neuse River RBRP and
provide ecological benefits within the Neuse River Basin. While benefits such as habitat improvement
and geomorphic stability are limited to the Site, reduced nutrient and sediment loading have farther
reaching effects. In addition, planned and implemented projects in the same watershed and basin as this
Site will realize cumulative benefits.
The Site construction and as -built surveys were completed between July 2017 and January 2018.
Monitoring Year 4 (MY4) assessments and site visits were completed between January and October
2021 to visually assess the conditions of the project and collect stream hydrology data. Per North
Carolina Interagency Review Team (NCIRT) guidelines, detailed monitoring and analysis of vegetation,
substrate, and channel cross -sectional dimensions did not occur during MY4. Visual observations,
hydrology data, and management practices are included in this report. To preserve the clarity and
continuity of reporting structure, this report maintains section and appendix numbering from previous
monitoring reports. Omitted sections are denoted in the Table of Contents.
Site performance for vegetation, stream geomorphology, and hydrology appear to be successful based
on visual assessments and are expected to exceed success criteria for MY5. Vegetation density and
diversity have noticeably improved from MY3 and appear to be performing adequately to attain the
interim success criteria of 260 stems per acre at the end of MY5. Visual observation indicated that
stream channels have remained geomorphically stable and multiple bankfull events were recorded on
both Martin Dairy and UT1.
Martin Dairy Mitigation Site
Monitoring Year 4 Annual Report — FINAL iii

MARTIN DAIRY MITIGATION SITE
Monitoring Year 4 Annual Report
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Section 1:
PROJECT OVERVIEW.......................................................................................................1-1
1.1
Project Goals and Objectives.....................................................................................................1-1
1.2
Monitoring Year 4 Data Assessment..........................................................................................1-2
1.2.1
Vegetative Assessment......................................................................................................1-2
1.2.2
Vegetation Areas of Concern.............................................................................................1-3
1.2.3
Stream Assessment............................................................................................................1-3
1.2.4
Stream Areas of Concern...................................................................................................1-3
1.2.5
Hydrology Assessment.......................................................................................................1-3
1.3
Monitoring Year 4 Summary......................................................................................................1-3
Section2:
METHODOLOGY.............................................................................................................2-1
Section 3:
REFERENCES...................................................................................................................3-1
APPENDICES
Appendix 1
General Tables and Figures
Figure 1
Project Vicinity Map
Figure 2
Project Component/Asset Map
Table 1
Project Components and Mitigation Credits
Table 2
Project Activity and Reporting History
Table 3
Project Contacts Table
Table 4
Project Information and Attributes
Appendix 2
Visual Assessment Data
Figure 3
Integrated Current Condition Plan View
Table 5a-d
Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment Table
Table 6
Vegetation Condition Assessment Table
Stream Photographs
Vegetation Plot Photographs
Appendix 3
Vegetation Plot Data' -
Table 7
Vegetation Plot Criteria Attainment
Table 8
CVS Vegetation Plot Metadata
Table 9
Planted and Total Stem Counts
Table 9a
Supplemental Planting Tree Species
Appendix 4 Morphological Summary Data and Plots*
Table 10a-b Baseline Stream Data Summary
Table 11 Morphology and Hydraulic Summary (Dimensional Parameters — Cross Section)
Table 12a-d Monitoring Data — Stream Reach Data Summary
Cross Section Plots
Reachwide and Cross Section Pebble Count Plots
Appendix 5 Hydrology Summary Data and Plots
Table 13 Verification of Bankfull Events and Monthly Rainfall Data
30-Day Cumulative Total Rainfall Data
*Content omitted from Monitoring Year 4 Reporl
Martin Dairy Mitigation Site
Monitoring Year 4 Annual Report — FINAL iv

Section 1: PROJECT OVERVIEW
The Martin Dairy Mitigation Site (Site) is located in central Orange County, approximately eight miles
northeast of Hillsborough, NC and eight miles south of Caldwell, NC off of Schley Road (Figure 1). The
Site is located in the Neuse River Basin and within the Falls Lake Water Supply Watershed, which has
been designated a Nutrient Sensitive Water. The project streams drain to the Eno River and eventually
to the Falls Lake Reservoir. The Site is within Hydrologic Unit Code 03020201030030, which is a Targeted
Local Watershed (Figure 1) as identified in the 2010 Neuse River Basin Restoration Priorities (RBRP)
(Breeding, 2010). The Site is in in the Carolina Slate Belt of the Piedmont Physiographic Province (USGS,
1998). The project watershed consists primarily of agricultural and wooded land and the drainage area
for project site is 526 acres (0.82 square miles).
The project streams consist of Martin Dairy Creek and one unnamed tributary (UT1). Mitigation work
within the Site included restoration of 2,135 linear feet (LF) of perennial stream channels. The riparian
areas were planted with native vegetation to improve habitat and protect water quality. The final
Mitigation Plan (Wildlands, 2017) was submitted to and accepted by DMS in March 2017. Construction
activities were completed by Land Mechanic Designs, Inc. in July 2017. Planting and seeding activities
were completed by Bruton Natural Systems, Inc. in December 2017. Baseline monitoring (MYO) was
conducted between August 2017 and January 2018. Monitoring Year 4 was conducted in 2021. Annual
monitoring will occur for seven years with the close-out anticipated to occur in 2025 given the success
criteria are met. Appendix 1 provides additional details on project activity, history, contact information,
and watershed/background information for the Site.
The Site is located on two tracts under the ownership of Ted H. Martin (PIN 9896-83-0483 & 9896-83-
9111). A conservation easement was recorded on 11.155 acres (Deed Book 6218, Pages 270 - 289). The
project is expected to provide 2,135 stream credits by closeout.
A project vicinity map and directions are provided in Figure 1 and project components/assets are
illustrated in Figure 2.
1.1 Project Goals and Objectives
Prior to construction activities, the primary degradation at the Site was the clearing of vegetation and
channelization of Martin Dairy Creek and UT1. Channelization, as indicated by dredge spoil in the
floodplain, involved straightening and deepening of the stream. Historic livestock grazing and hay
cultivation on the Site further contributed to degradation of the riparian corridor and stream channel.
Table 4 in Appendix 1 and Tables 10a and 10b found in Appendix 4 of the MY3 report present the pre -
restoration conditions in detail.
The project is intended to provide numerous ecological benefits within the Neuse River Basin. While
benefits such as habitat improvement and geomorphic stability are limited to the project site, reduced
nutrient and sediment loading have farther reaching effects. The table below, describes expected
outcomes to water quality and ecological processes are provided with project goals and objectives. The
project goals and objectives were developed as part of the Mitigation Plan considering the goals and
objectives listed in the Neuse River RBRP plan and strive to maximize ecological and water quality uplift
within the watershed.
The following project goals and related objectives established in the Mitigation Plan (Wildlands, 2017)
include:
Martin Dairy Mitigation Site
Monitoring Year 4 Annual Report — FINAL 1-1

Goal
Objective
Expected Outcomes
Reconstruct stream channels with
Raise water table and hydrate riparian
Reconnect channels with
designed bankfull dimensions and
floodplains and riparian
depth based on reference reach
wetlands. Allow more frequent flood
wetlands to allow a natural
data. Remove existing dredge
flows to disperse on the floodplain.
flooding regime.
spoil to reconnect channel with
Support geomorphology and higher level
adjacent wetlands.
functions.
Construct stream channels that
Reduce sediment inputs from bank
Improve the stability of
will maintain stable cross-
erosion. Reduce shear stress on channel
stream channels.
sections, patterns, and profiles
boundary. Support all stream functions
over time.
above hydrology.
Plant native tree and understory
Reduce sediment inputs from bank
Restore and enhance native
species in riparian zones and
erosion and runoff. Increase nutrient
cycling and storage in floodplain. Provide
floodplain and streambank
plant native shrub and
riparian habitat. Add a source of LWD
vegetation.
herbaceous species on
and organic material to the streams.
streambanks.
Support all stream functions.
Install habitat features such as
Increase and diversify available habitats
constructed riffles, lunker logs,
for macroinvertebrates, fish, and
Improve instream habitat.
and brush toes into restored
amphibians leading to colonization and
streams. Add woody materials to
increase in biodiversity over time. Add
channel beds. Construct pools of
complexity including LWD to the streams.
varying depth.
i
Protect the Site from encroachment on
Permanently protect the Site
Establish a conservation
the riparian corridor and direct impact to
from harmful uses.
easement on the Site.
streams and wetlands. Support all stream
functions.
1.2 Monitoring Year 4 Data Assessment
Annual monitoring and quarterly site visits were conducted during monitoring year 4 (MY4) to visually
assess the condition of the project and collect hydrology data. Per NCIRT guidelines, detailed monitoring
and analysis of vegetation, substrate, and channel cross -sectional dimensions did not occur during MY4.
1.2.1 Vegetative Assessment
Detailed vegetation inventory and analysis is not required during MY4. Visual assessment during MY4
indicated that vegetation is performing adequately to attain interim success criteria of 260 planted
stems per acre at the end of MY5 and terminal success criteria of 210 planted stems per acre averaging
ten feet in height at the end of MY7.
Tree vigor and vegetative cover along UT1 has vastly improved from MY3. Container trees and tublings
planted in MY3 have thrived and vegetative and herbaceous cover has benefited from the addition of
soil amendments. The effects of the supplemental planting done during the prior year can be seen
through improvements in stem density across the Site.
Martin Dairy Mitigation Site
Monitoring Year 4 Annual Report — FINAL 1-2

1.2.2 Vegetation Areas of Concern
No Vegetative Areas of Concern were identified during MY4.
1.2.3 Stream Assessment
Detailed dimensional survey and analysis is not required during MY4. Visual monitoring indicated that
the stream channel is performing as designed. No deposition or erosion exceeding approximate natural
levels or indicators of channel instability were observed.
1.2.4 Stream Areas of Concern
No Stream Areas of Concern were identified during MY4.
1.2.5 Hydrology Assessment
At the end of the MY7, two or more bankfull events must have occurred in separate years within the
restoration reaches. Multiple bankfull events were recorded on both Martin Dairy Creek and UT1 with
automated crest gages during MY4 data collection. Both Martin Dairy Creek and UT1 recorded bankfull
events during MY1, MY2, MY3, and MY4 (Table 13); therefore, the Site has met the bankfull frequency
success criteria for the seven year monitoring period.
1.3 Monitoring Year 4 Summary
Visual assessment indicated that all stream reaches within the Site are geomorphically stable and
functioning as designed. Vegetation has become well established along the stream banks providing
shade, stability, and a source of organic material. Survival and growth of planted trees appear to be on
track meet interim success criteria. The effects of the supplemental planting completed the prior year
can be seen across the Site. Herbaceous vegetation is thriving, and species diversity and abundance
appears to have increased. Bankfull event frequency criteria have been satisfied for the duration of the
monitoring period.
Martin Dairy Mitigation Site
Monitoring Year 4 Annual Report — FINAL 1-3

Section 2: METHODOLOGY
All data collected for the Integrated Current Condition Mapping was recorded using a Trimble handheld
GPS with sub -meter accuracy and processed using Pathfinder and ArcGIS software. Crest gages and
pressure transducers were installed in surveyed riffle cross sections and monitored quarterly. Hydrology
attainment installation and monitoring methods are in accordance with the USACE (2003) standards.
Vegetation monitoring protocols followed the Carolina Vegetation Survey-NCDMS Level 2 Protocol (Lee
et al., 2008). Summary information and data related to the success of various project and monitoring
elements can be found in the tables and figures in the report appendices. Narrative background and
supporting information formerly found in these reports can be found in the Mitigation Plan documents
available on DMS's website. All raw data supporting the tables and figures in the appendices are
available from DMS upon request.
Martin Dairy Mitigation Site
Monitoring Year 4 Annual Report — FINAL 2-1

Section 3: REFERENCES
Breeding, R. 2010. Neuse River Basin Restoration Priorities 2010. NCEEP, NC
Doll, B.A., Grabow, G.L., Hall, K.A., Halley, J., Harman, W.A., Jennings, G.D., and Wise, D.E. 2003. Stream
Restoration A Natural Channel Design Handbook.
Harrelson, C.C., Rawlins, C.L., Potyondy, J.P. 1994. Stream Channel Reference Sites: An Illustrated Guide
to Field Technique. Gen. Tech. Rep. RM-245. Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest
Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station. 61 p.
Lee, M.T., Peet, R.K., S.D., Wentworth, T.R. 2008. CVS-EEP Protocol for Recording Vegetation Version
4.2. Retrieved from http://cvs.bio.unc.edu/protocol/cvs-eep-protocol-v4.2-lev1-5.pdf.
Rosgen, D. L. 1994. A classification of natural rivers. Catena 22:169-199.
Rosgen, D.L. 1996. Applied River Morphology. Pagosa Springs, CO: Wildland Hydrology Books.
Rosgen, D.L. 1997. A Geomorphological Approach to Restoration of Incised Rivers. Proceedings of the
Conference on Management of Landscapes Disturbed by Channel Incision. Center For
Computational Hydroscience and Bioengineering, Oxford Campus, University of Mississippi, Pages
12-22.
United States Army Corps of Engineers. 2003. Stream Mitigation Guidelines. USACE, NCDENR-DWQ,
USEPA, NCWRC.
United States Geological Survey. 1998. North Carolina Geology.
http://www.geology.enr.state.nc.us/usgs/carolina.htm
Wildlands Engineering, Inc. 2018. Martin Dairy Mitigation Site Baseline Monitoring Document and As -
Built Baseline Report. DMS, Raleigh, NC.
Wildlands Engineering, Inc. 2017. Martin Dairy Mitigation Project Mitigation Plan. DMS, Raleigh, NC.
Martin Dairy Mitigation Site
Monitoring Year 4 Annual Report — FINAL 3-1

APPENDIX 1. General Tables and Figures

j•�•�� Hydrologic Unit Code (14)
- Project Area
DIMS Targeted Local Watersheds i..E
•�• �•�.� 03020201020010
i
1 f'1
03020201Q20020
.gr [. r rck
hyy. Ik
03020201030030
The subject project site is an environmental restoration site of the
NCDEQ Division of Mitigation Services (DIMS) and is
encompassed by a recorded conservation easement, but is
bordered by land under private ownership. Accessing the site may
require traversing areas near or along the easement boundary and
therefore access by the general public is not permitted. Access by
authorized personnel of state and federal agencies or their
designees/contractors involved in the development, oversight,
and stewardship of the restoration site is permitted within the terms
and timeframes of their defined roles. Any intended site visitation or
activity by any person outside of these previously sanctioned roles
and activites requires prior coordination with DIMS.
tvv
WILDLANDS
ENGINEERING
120030
0
1r !
�{ f
f
-
- � f
i -
Y
03020201030040
1
Directions:
From Raleigh, NC, take 1-40 West towards Durham.
Take exit 279B for NC-147 N towards Durham/Downtown.
Travel approximately 13 miles and merge onto 1-85 S. Travel
approximately 2 miles, take exit 170 for US-70 W.
In 0.2 miles turn right onto Pleasant Green Road. Travel 5.8
miles and stay straight through the intersection with
St. Mary Road onto Schley Rd. In 0.7 miles, the parking area
is on the left in a powerline R/W 200 feet
south of Lipscomb Grove Church Road.
Figure 1. Project Vicinity Map
Martin Dairy Mitigation Site
"k, 0 0.5 1 Miles DMS Project No. 97087
I I I I I Monitoring Year 4- 2021
Orange County, NC

Figure 2. Project Component/Asset Map
W I L D L A N D S 0 100 200 Feet Martin Dairy Mitigation Site
ENGINEERING DMS Project No. 97087
I I I
Monitoring Year 4 - 2021
Orange County, NC

Table 2. Project Activity and Reporting History
Martin Dairy Mitigation Site
DMS Project No. 97087
Monitoring Year 4 - 2021
Activity or Report
Mitigation Plan
Mata Collection Complete
March 2017
Completion o =�
March 2017
Final Design - Construction Plans
March 2017
March 2017
Construction
June 2017 -July 2017
July 2017
Temporary S&E mix applied to entire project area'
June 2017 -July 2017
July 2017
Permanent seed mix applied to reach/segments'
June 2017 -July 2017
July 2017
Bare root and live stake plantings for reach/segments
December 2017
December 2017
Baseline Monitoring Document (Year 0)
Stream Survey
August 2017
January 2018
Vegetation Survey
January 2018
Year 1 Monitoring
Stream Survey
June 2018
December 2018
Vegetation Survey
September 2018
Year 2 Monitoring
Stream Survey
May 2019
December 2019
Vegetation Survey
September 2019
Supplemental Planting
January 2020
Year 3 Monitoring
Stream Survey
March 2020
December 2020
Vegetation Survey
September 2020
Year 4 Monitoring
December 2021
Year 5 Monitoring
Stream Survey
2022
December 2022
Vegetation Surve,,
2022
Year 6 Monitoring
December 2023
Year 7 Monitoring
Stream Sury
2024
December 2024
Vegetation Su
2024
'Seed and mulch is added as each section of construction is completed.
Table 3. Project Contact Table
Martin Dairy Mitigation Site
DMS Project No. 97087
Monitoring Year 4 - 2021
Wildlands Engineering, Inc.
Designer
312 West Millbrook Road, Suite 225
Angela Allen, PE
Raleigh, NC 27609
919.851.9986
Land Mechanic Designs, Inc.
Construction Contractor
126 Circle G Lane
Willow Spring, NC 27592
Bruton Natural Systems, Inc
Planting Contractor
P.O. Box 1197
Fremont, NC 27830
Land Mechanic Designs, Inc.
Seeding Contractor
126 Circle G Lane
Willow Spring, NC 27592
Seed Mix Sources
Green Resource, LLC
Nursery Stock Suppliers
Dykes and Sons Nursery and Greenhouse
Bare Roots
Live Stakes
Bruton Natural Systems, Inc
Monitoring Performers
Wildlands Engineering, Inc.
Jason Lorch
Monitoring, POC
919.851.9986

Table 4. Project Information and Attributes
Martin Dairy Mitigation Site
DIMS Project No. 97087
Monitoring Year 4 - 2021
PROJECT•
•
Project Name
Martin Dairy Mitigation Site
County
Orange County
Project Area (acres)
11.155
Planted Area (acres)
10.139
Project Coordinates (latitude and longitude)
PROJECT•
36- 7' 25.76" N, 79- 0' 14.26" W
SUMMARY INFORMATION
Physiographic Province
Carolina Slate Belt of the Piedmont Physiographic Province
River Basin
Neuse River
USGS Hydrologic Unit 8-digit
03020201
USGS Hydrologic Unit 14-digit
03020201030030
D W R Sub -basin
03-04-01
Project Drainiage Area (acres)
526
Project Drainage Area Percentage of Impervious Area
0.4%
CGIA Land Use Classification
REACH
59.0%forested, 40.6%cultivated, 0.4%impervious
SUMMARY INFORMATION
Parameters
Martin Dairy UT1
Length of Reach (linear feet) - Post -Restoration
1,918 217
Drainage Area (acres)
526 141
NCDWR Stream Identification Score
36.75 30.75
NCDWR Water Quality Classification
WS-IV
Morphological Desnption (stream type)
Perennial
Evolutionary Trend (Simon's Model) - Pre -Restoration
IV: Degradation and Widening
Underlying Mapped Soils
Chewacla loam, Herndon silt loam, Tatum silt loam
Drainage Class
-
-
Soil Hydric Status
-
-
Slope
FEMA Classification
N/A
Native Vegetation Community
Piedmont Bottomland Forest
Percent Composition Exotic Invasive Vegetation - Post -Restoration
REGULATORY•
0%
• •
Regulation
Applicable?
Resolved?
Supporting Documentation
Waters of the United States -Section 404
Yes
Yes
USACE Nationwide Permit No. 27 and DWQ 401 Water Quality Certification
No. 4087.
Waters of the United States -Section 401
Yes
Yes
Division of Land Quality (Dam Safety)
N/A
N/A
N/A
Endangered Species Act
Yes
Yes
Martin Diary Mitigation Plan; Wildlands determined "no effect" on Orange
County listed endangered species. The USFWS responded on June 3, 2016 and
concurred with NCWRC stating that "the proposed action is not likely to
adversely affect any federally -listed endangered or threatened species, their
formally designated critical habitat, or species currently proposed for listing
under the Act."
Historic Preservation Act
Yes
Yes
Correspondence from SHPO on June 3, 2016 indicating they were not aware
of any historic resources that would be affected by the project.
Coastal Zone Management Act(CZMA)/Coastal Area Management Act
(CAMA)
N/A
N/A
N/A
FEMA Floodplain Compliance
N/A
N/A
N/A
Essential Fisheries Habitat
N/A
N/A
N/A

APPENDIX 2. Visual Assessment Data

Figure 3. Intergrated Current Condition Plan View
W I L D L A N D S 0 100 200 Feet Martin Dairy Mitigation Site
ENGINEERING I I DMSProject No. 97087
Monitoring Year 4 - 2021
Orange County, NC

Table Sa. Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment Table
Martin Dairy Mitigation Project
DMS Project No. 97087
Monitoring Year 4 - 2021
Martin Dairy Reach 1
M1
1. Bed
Stable, Total Number
hannel Sub -Category Metric Pe s
rfor.ing a in As -Built
Intended =NEW
1. Vertical Stability Aegradation
[u rriberl,.of Amount of % Stable, Stabilizing Stabilizing Stabilizing
Un table Performing as Woody Woody
Seg..n Footage Intended V Woody
egetation Vegetation Vegetation
0 0 100%
(Riffle and Run Units) Degradation
0 0 100%
2. Riffle Condition Texture/Substrate 8
8
100%
100%
3. Meander Pool Depth Sufficient 9
9
Condition Length Appropriate 9
9
100%
100%
Thalweg centering at upstream of 8
8
4. Thalweg Position meander bend
9
Thalweg rinRun
centeg at downstream of 9
100%
meander bend Glide
2. Bank
Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting
1. Scoured/Eroded
simply from poor growth and/or scour
0
0
100%
ri/a
n/a
n/a
and erosion.
Banks undercut/overhanging to the
extent that mass wasting appears likely.
2. Undercut
Does NOT include undercuts that are
0
0
100%
n/a
n/a
n/a
modest, appear sustainable and are
providing habitat.
3. Mass Wasting
Bank slumping, calving, or collapse.
0
0
100%
n/a
n/a
n/a
Totals
0
0
100%
n/a
n/a
n/a
3. Engineered
Structures'
Structures physically intact with no
1. Overall Integrity
dislodged boulders or logs.
5
5
100%
2. Grade Control
Grade control structures exhibiting
5
5
100%
maintenance of grade across the sill.
Structures lacking any substantial flow
2a. Piping
underneath sills or arms.
5
5
100%
Bank erosion within the structures
3. Bank Protection
extent of influence does not exceed
5
5
100%
15%.
Pool forming structures maintaining
4. Habitat
—Max Pool Depth : Bankfull Depth >_ 1.6
6
6
100%
Rootwads/logs providing some cover at
baseflow.
'Excludes constructed riffles since they are evaluated in section 1.

Table Sb. Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment Table
Martin Dairy Mitigation Project
DMS Project No. 97087
Monitoring Year 4 - 2021
Martin Dairy Reach 2
M1
1. Bed
Stable, Total Number
hannel Sub -Category Metric Pe s
rfor.ing a in As -Built
Intended =NEW
1. Vertical Stability Aegradation
[u rriberl,.of Amount of % Stable, Stabilizing Stabilizing Stabilizing
Un table Performing as Woody Woody
Seg..n Footage Intended V Woody
egetation Vegetation Vegetation
0 0 100%
(Riffle and Run Units) Degradation
0 0 100%
2. Riffle Condition Texture/Substrate 13
13
100%
100%
3. Meander Pool Depth Sufficient 13
13
Condition Length Appropriate 13
13
100%
100%
Thalweg centering at upstream of 13
13
4. Thalweg Position meander bend
13
Thalweg rinRun
centeg at downstream of 13
100%
meander bend Glide
2. Bank
Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting
1. Scoured/Eroded
simply from poor growth and/or scour
0
0
100%
ri/a
n/a
n/a
and erosion.
Banks undercut/overhanging to the
extent that mass wasting appears likely.
2. Undercut
Does NOT include undercuts that are
0
0
100%
n/a
n/a
n/a
modest, appear sustainable and are
providing habitat.
3. Mass Wasting
Bank slumping, calving, or collapse
0
0
100%
n/a
n/a
n/a
Totals
0
0
100%
n/a
n/a
n/a
3. Engineered
Structures'
Structures physically intact with no
1. Overall Integrity
dislodged boulders or logs.
8
8
100%
Grade control structures exhibiting
2. Grade Control
maintenance of grade across the sill.
8
8
100%
Structures lacking any substantial flow
2a. Piping
underneath sills or arms.
8
8
100%
Bank erosion within the structures
3. Bank Protection
extent of influence does not exceed
8
8
100%
15%.
Pool forming structures maintaining
4. Habitat
—Max Pool Depth : Bankfull Depth >_ 1.6
4
4
100%
Rootwads/logs providing some cover at
baseflow.
'Excludes constructed riffles since they are evaluated in section 1.

Table Sc. Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment Table
Martin Dairy Mitigation Project
DMS Project No. 97087
Monitoring Year 4 - 2021
UTl
Number
MajorChannel Stable, Total Number
Category Channel Sub -Category Metric Performing as in As -Built
Intended =NEW
1. Bed Aegradation
1. Vertical Stability
[umberleof Amo Number.ith Footagewith Adjust%for
Unst b unt of % Stable, Stabilizing Stabilizing Stabilizing
Segmen s Unstable Performing as Woody Woody Woody
Footage Intended Vegetation Vegetation Vegetation
0 0 100%
(Riffle and Run Units) Degradation
0 0 100%
2. Riffle Condition Texture/Substrate 4 4
100%
100%
3. Meander Pool Depth Sufficient 4
4
Condition Length Appropriate 4
4
100%
100%
Thalweg centering at upstream of 4
4
4. Thalweg Position meander bend Run
4
Thalweg centering at downstream of 4
100%
meander bend Glide
2. Bank
Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting
1. Scoured/Eroded
simply from poor growth and/or scour
0
0
100%
ri/a
n/a
n/a
and erosion.
Banks undercut/overhanging to the
extent that mass wasting appears likely.
2. Undercut
Does NOT include undercuts that are
0
0
100%
n/a
n/a
n/a
modest, appear sustainable and are
providing habitat.
3. Mass Wasting
Bank slumping, calving, or collapse
0
0
100%
n/a
n/a
n/a
Totals
0
0
100%
n/a
n/a
n/a
3. Engineered
Structures'
Structures physically intact with no
1. Overall Integrity
dislodged boulders or logs.
1
1
100%
Grade control structures exhibiting
2. Grade Control
maintenance of grade across the sill.
1
1
100%
Structures lacking any substantial flow
2a. Piping
underneath sills or arms.
1
1
100%
Bank erosion within the structures
3. Bank Protection
extent of influence does not exceed
1
1
100%
15%.
Pool forming structures maintaining
4. Habitat
—Max Pool Depth : Bankfull Depth >_ 1.6
2
2
100%
Rootwads/logs providing some cover at
baseflow.
'Excludes constructed riffles since they are evaluated in section 1.

Table 6. Vegetation Condition Assessment Table
Martin Dairy Mitigation Site
DMS Project No. 97087
Monitoring Year 4 - 2021
Planted Acreage 10.139
Vegetation Category DefinitionsMapping
A L (Ac)
ined
rAcreage
%of Planted
Acreage
Very limited cover of both woody and herbaceous
Bare Areas 0
0
0
0%
material
Low Stem Density Woody stem densities clearly below target levels based
0
0
0
0%
Areas on MY3, 4, or 5 stem count criteria.
Total
0
0
0%
Areas of Poor Growth
Areas with woody stems of a size class that are obviously
0
0
0
0%
Rates or Vigor
small given the monitoring year.
Cumulative Total
0
0.00
0%
Easement Acreage 11.155
or:
Invasive Areas of Areas of points (if too small to render as polygons at map
Concern scale). 1,000 0 0% 0
Easement Areas of points (if too small to render as polygons at map
none
Encroachment Areas scale). 0 0 0%

STREAM PHOTOGRAPHS

PHOTO POINT 1 Martin Dairy Ill — upstream (41912021) 1 PHOTO POINT 1 Martin Dairy Ill — downstream (41912021) 1
PHOTO POINT 2 Martin Dairy Ill — upstream (41912021) 1 PHOTO POINT 2 Martin Dairy Ill — downstream (41912021) 1
PHOTO POINT 3 Martin Dairy Ill — upstream (41912021)
PHOTO POINT 3 Martin Dairy Ill — downstream (41912021)

PHOTO POINT 4 Martin Dairy R2 — upstream (41912021) 1 PHOTO POINT 4 Martin Dairy R2 — downstream (41912021) 1
PHOTO POINT 5 Martin Dairy R2 — upstream (41912021)
PHOTO POINT 6 Martin Dairy R2 — upstream (41912021)
PHOTO POINT 5 Martin Dairy R2 — downstream (41912021)
PHOTO POINT 6 Martin Dairy R2 — downstream (41912021)

VEGETATION PLOT PHOTOGRAPHS

VEG PLOT 7 (0912412021) 1 VEG PLOT 8 (0912412021) 1

APPENDIX 3. Vegetation Plot Data
Vegetation inventory and analysis not required during MY4

APPENDIX 4. Morphological Summary Data and Plots
Morphological survey and analysis not required during MY4

APPENDIX 5. Hydrology Summary Data and Plots

O m CO
m
a
s
z
E
;
r
0
N
O
N
-
C
w
r
CL
v
v
v
"
a
a
0
0
m
T
C
cf0
C
�
n
LL
O
K
O
I
(ui)
uoilelfdl3BJd

m
m
m
0
NO pe;uiea
7 M N c-I O
O CO �0 7 N
N
(ui) uoile3idi:)aJd ani3elnw n:) AeQ OE
unr
Aew
AV
Jew
qaj
uer
O
0
1