20180196 Ver 1_Year 2 Monitoring Report_2021_20211203

ID#* 20180196
Select Reviewer:
Erin Davis
Initial Review Completed Date 12/03/2021
Mitigation Project Submittal - 12/3/2021
Version* 1
Is this a Prospectus, Technical Proposal or a New Site?*
Type of Mitigation Project:*
Stream Wetlands Buffer Nutrient Offset
(Select all that apply)
Project Contact Information
Contact Name:*
Jeremiah Dow
Project Information
ID#:* 20180196
Existing ID#
Project Type: • DMS Mitigation Bank
Project Name: Catfish Pond Mitigation Site
County: Durham
Document Information
O Yes O No
Email Address:*
[e-mail]
Version:* 1
Existing Version
Mitigation Document Type:*
Mitigation Monitoring Report
File Upload: CatfishPond_100039_MY2_2021.pdf 11.26MB
Please upload only one PDF of the complete file that needs to be submitted...
Signature
Print Name:* Jeremiah Dow
Signature: *

1
MONITORING YEAR 2
ANNUAL REPORT
FINAL
CATFISH POND MITIGATION SITE
Durham County, NC
NCDEQ Contract No. 007424
DMS Project No. 100039
USACE Action ID No. 2018-00424
NCDWR Project No. 2018-0196
Data Collection Period: January -November 2021
Draft Submission Date: November 8, 2021
Final Submission Date: December 1, 2021
PREPARED FOR:
NC Department of Environmental Quality
Division of Mitigation Services
1652 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1652

PREPARED BY:
W
WILDLANDS
E MC, I N E E R I N G
312 West Millbrook Road, Suite 225
Raleigh, NC 27609
Jason Lorch
[e-mail]
Phone: [phone]

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Wildlands Engineering, Inc. (Wildlands) implemented a full delivery project at the Catfish Pond
Mitigation Site (Site) for the North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality Division of Mitigation
Services (DIMS). A total of 7,140 linear feet of perennial and intermittent streams were restored and
enhanced in Durham County, NC. The Site is expected to generate 3,748.800 stream mitigation units
when calculated along stream centerlines. The Site is located approximately 12 miles north of the City of
Durham and approximately 3 miles east of the Orange/Durham County border (Figure 1). The Site is in
the Neuse River Basin 8-Digit Hydrologic Unit Code 03020201 and NC Division of Water Resources
(NCDWR) Subbasin 03-04-01. The Site contains Catfish Creek and 3 unnamed tributaries. The streams
drain to Mountain Creek, which flows into Little River, the Eno River, and then Falls Lake. Falls Lake is
classified as Water Supply Waters (WS-IV) and Nutrient Sensitive Waters (NSW). The 20.73-acre Site is
protected with a permanent conservation easement.
The Site is located within a DIMS Targeted Local Watershed as discussed in the 2010 Neuse River Basin
Restoration Priorities (RBRP), which highlights the importance of riparian buffers for stream restoration
projects (Breeding, 2010). Past degradation at the Site included an in -line pond, extensive logging,
stream channelization, and livestock access to streams and buffers.
The project goals established in the Catfish Pond Site Mitigation Plan (Mitigation Plan) (Wildlands, 2019)
were completed with consideration of goals and objectives described in the Neuse River RBRP. The
project goals established include:
• Exclude cattle from project streams;
• Reconnect channels with floodplains and riparian wetlands to allow a natural flooding regime;
• Improve the stability of stream channels;
• Improve instream habitat;
• Restore and enhance native floodplain and streambank vegetation; and
• Permanently protect the Site from harmful uses.
The project will contribute to achieving goals for the watershed discussed in the Neuse River RBRP and
provide ecological benefits within the Neuse River Basin. While benefits such as habitat improvement
and geomorphic stability are limited to the Site, others, such as reduced pollutant and sediment loading,
have farther reaching effects.
Site construction, seeding, and tree planting were completed in March and April 2020. As -built surveys
were conducted in March and April 2020. Monitoring Year 2 (MY2) assessments and site visits were
completed in April, September, October, and November 2021 to evaluate the condition of the project.
Overall, the Site has met the required vegetation and stream success criteria for MY2. The average
vegetation plot stem density for the Site is 540 planted stems per acre and is therefore on track to meet
the MY3 interim requirement of 320 planted stems per acre. Sporadic populations of invasive vegetation
were treated with various herbicide application approaches in September 2021. Follow up treatments
are scheduled for winter 2020/2021. Project streams are stable and functioning. Cross -sections 1, 2, 3, 5,
and 6 show limited deviations from as -built due to sediment deposition and vegetation establishment.
An area of erosion around cross-section 7 was identified and repaired in MY2. The riffle material around
cross-section 4 was washed away leaving bedrock. Both cross -sections are stable, but Wildlands will
continue to monitor their condition in MY3. A bankfull event was documented on UT1 Reach 2 during
MY2.
Catfish Pond Mitigation Site
Monitoring Year 2 Annual Report - FINAL

CATFISH POND MITIGATION SITE
Monitoring Year 2 Annual Report
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Section 1:
PROJECT OVERVIEW.......................................................................................................I
1.1
Project Goals and Objectives.....................................................................................................1-1
1.2
Monitoring Year 2 Data Assessment..........................................................................................1-2
1.2.1
Vegetative Assessment......................................................................................................1-2
1.2.2
Vegetation Areas of Concern.............................................................................................1-3
1.2.3
Stream Assessment............................................................................................................1-3
1.2.4
Stream Areas of Concern...................................................................................................1-3
1.2.5
Hydrology Assessment.......................................................................................................1-4
1.2.6
Wetland Assessment..........................................................................................................1-4
1.2.7
Adaptive Management Plan...............................................................................................1-4
1.3
Monitoring Year 2 Summary......................................................................................................1-4
Section 2:
METHODOLOGY.............................................................................................................2-1
Section 3:
REFERENCES...................................................................................................................3-1
APPENDICES
Appendix 1
General Figures and Tables
Figure 1
Project Vicinity Map
Figure 2
Project Component/Asset Map
Table 1
Mitigation Assets and Components
Table 2
Project Activity and Reporting History
Table 3
Project Contact Table
Table 4
Project Information and Attributes
Appendix 2 Visual Assessment Data
Figure 3-3b Integrated Current Condition Plan View Map
Table 5a-d Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment Table
Table 6 Vegetation Condition Assessment Table
Stream Photographs
Stream Areas of Concern Photographs
Vegetation Plot Photographs
Appendix 3
Vegetation Plot Data
Table 7
Vegetation Plot Criteria Attainment Table
Table 8
CVS Vegetation Tables — Metadata
Table 9a
Fixed Plots: Planted and Total Stem Counts
Table 9b
Random Plots: Planted and Total Stem Counts
Appendix 4
Morphological Summary Data and Plots
Table 10a-b
Baseline Stream Data Summary
Table 11
Cross -Section Morphology Monitoring Summary
Table 12a-d
Monitoring Data — Stream Reach Data Summary
Cross -Section Plots
Reachwide Pebble Count Plots
Catfish Pond Mitigation Site
Monitoring Year 2 Annual Report - FINAL ii

Appendix 5 Hydrology Summary Data
Table 13 Verification of Bankfull Events
Monthly Rainfall Data
Table 14 Wetland Gauge Summary
Groundwater Gauge Plots
Catfish Pond Mitigation Site
lilIWO Monitoring Year 2 Annual Report - FINAL

Section 1: PROJECT OVERVIEW
The Catfish Pond Mitigation Site (Site) is located in Durham County approximately 12 miles north of the
City of Durham and approximately 3 miles east of the Orange/Durham County border (Figure 1). The Site
is located within the Falls Lake Water Supply Watershed, which is within the Neuse River Basin. Both the
Neuse River and Falls Lake have been designated as Nutrient Sensitive Water. The Site is within
Hydrologic Unit Code 03020201020040 and is located within the Neuse River Targeted Local Watershed
(Figure 1) as identified in the 2010 Neuse River Basin Priorities (RBRP) (Breeding, 2010). The Site is in the
Carolina Slate Belt of the Piedmont Physiographic Province (USGS, 1998). The project watershed consists
primarily of agricultural and forested land. Approximately 197 acres drain to the downstream end of
Catfish Creek and 30 acres drain to Mountain Tributary for a total Site drainage area of 227 acres.
The project streams consist of Catfish Creek and three unnamed tributaries (UT1, UT2, and Mountain
Tributary). Mitigation work within the Site included restoration and enhancement II of 7,140 linear feet
of intermittent and perennial stream channels (Figure 2 and Table 1). The riparian areas were planted
with native vegetation to improve habitat and protect water quality. The final Mitigation Plan
(Wildlands, 2019) was submitted to and accepted by the North Carolina Department of Environmental
Quality Division of Mitigation Services (DIMS) in July 2019. Construction activities were completed by
Main Stream Earthwork, Inc. in March 2020. Planting and seeding activities were completed by Bruton
Natural Systems, Inc. and Canady's Landscaping and Erosion in March and April 2020. Baseline
monitoring (MYO) was conducted in March and April 2020. Annual monitoring will occur for seven years
with the closeout anticipated to commence in 2027 provided the success criteria are met. Appendix 1
provides additional details on project activity, history, contact information, and background information
for the Site.
The Site is located on 2 parcels under single ownership. A conservation easement was recorded on 20.73
acres. The project is expected to provide 3,748.800 stream mitigation units (SMU) at closeout. A Project
Vicinity Map and directions are provided in Figure 1 and a Project Component/Asset Map is illustrated in
Figure 2.
1.1 Project Goals and Objectives
Prior to construction activities, one of the primary causes of degradation on the Site was the creation of
an in -line pond on Catfish Creek Reach 6 sometime between 1940 and 1955. During that same time
extensive logging and farm road construction took place at the Site. In 1972, aerial photographs suggest
that portions of UT1 had been straightened for agricultural purposes. Catfish Creek above and below the
pond, UT2, and Mountain Tributary showed few signs of channel manipulation, but were impaired due
to historical livestock access. Table 4 in Appendix 1 and Tables 10a-b in Appendix 4 present additional
information on pre -restoration conditions.
The project is intended to provide numerous ecological benefits helping achieve goals for the watershed
discussed in the Neuse River RBRP. While benefits such as habitat improvement and geomorphic
stability are limited to the Site, reduced nutrient and sediment loading have farther reaching effects.
The table below describes expected outcomes to water quality and ecological processes and provides
project goals and objectives. The project goals and objectives were developed as part of the Mitigation
Plan (Wildlands, 2019) considering the goals and objectives listed in the Neuse River RBRP and strive to
maximize ecological and water quality uplift within the watershed.
Catfish Pond Mitigation Site
4111100 Monitoring Year 2 Annual Report - FINAL 1-1

Goals
Objectives
Expected Outcomes
Install fencing around
Reduce and control sediment inputs; reduce and
Exclude cattle from
conservation easements adjacent
manage nutrient inputs; reduce and manage fecal
project streams.
to cattle pastures to remove
coliform inputs. Contribute to protection of or
livestock.
improvement to a Water Supply Waterbody.
Reconnect channels
Reconstruct stream channels for
with floodplains and
bankfull dimensions and depth
Raise water table and hydrate riparian wetlands.
riparian wetlands to
relative to the existing floodplain.
Allow more frequent flood flows to disperse on the
allow a natural
Remove existing berms to re-
floodplain. Support geomorphology and higher -
flooding regime.
connect channel with adjacent
level functions.
wetlands.
Improve the
Construct stream channels that
Significantly reduce sediment inputs from bank
stability of stream
will maintain stable cross -
erosion. Reduce shear stress on channel boundary.
channels.
sections, patterns, and profiles
Support all stream functions above hydrology.
over time.
Install habitat features such as
constructed riffles, cover/lunker
Increase and diversify available habitats for
Improve instream
logs, and brush toes into
macroinvertebrates, fish, and amphibians leading
habitat.
restored/enhanced streams. Add
to colonization and increase in biodiversity over
woody materials to channel beds.
time. Add complexity including LWD to streams.
Construct pools of varying depth.
Restore and
Plant native tree and un ry
Reduce sediment inputs from bank erosion and
enhance native
d plant
npl
species in riparian zone and
runoff. Increase nutrient cycling and storage in
floodplain and
floodplain. Provide riparian habitat. Add a source
streambank
appropriate species on
of LWD and organic material to stream. Support all
vegetation.
streambank.
stream functions.
Permanently
Protect Site from encroachment on the riparian
protect the project
Establish conservation easements
corridor and direct impact to streams and
Site from harmful
on the Site.
wetlands. Support all stream functions.
uses.
1.2 Monitoring Year 2 Data Assessment
Annual monitoring and site visits were conducted during Monitoring Year 2 (MY2) to assess the
condition of the project. The vegetation, stream, and hydrology success criteria for the Site follow the
approved success criteria presented in the Mitigation Plan (Wildlands, 2019).
1.2.1 Vegetative Assessment
Planted woody vegetation is being monitored in accordance with the guidelines and procedures
developed by the Carolina Vegetation Survey-EEP Level 2 Protocol (Lee et al., 2008). During baseline
monitoring (MYO) a total of six standard 10-meter by 10-meter vegetation plots and one 5-meter by 20-
meter vegetation plot were established within the project easement area. An additional two random
vegetation plots are monitored annually, in which a new center point is arbitrarily chosen each year
within the conservation easement.
The final vegetation success criteria at the end of MY7 are the survival of 210 planted stems per acre
averaging 10 feet in height. Interim success criteria are the survival of 320 planted stems per acre at the
Catfish Pond Mitigation Site
460 Monitoring Year 2 Annual Report - FINAL 1-2

end of MY3 and 260 planted stems per acre with an average stem height of 7 feet at the end of MYS. No
one species shall account for more than 50% of the required number of stems within any vegetation plot
at the end of MY7.
The MY2 vegetative survey was completed in September 2021. Vegetation monitoring resulted in an
average stem density of 540 planted stems per acre, which is well above the interim success criteria of
320 stems per acre required at MY3. All nine vegetation plots individually met the interim success
criteria and stem densities for each plot range from 405 to 769 stems per acre. Volunteer stems have
begun to establish themselves and include desirable species such as American persimmon (Diospyros
virginiana), tulip poplar (Liriodendron tulipifera), sycamore (Platanus occidentalis), and green ash
(Fraxinus pennsylvanica). Refer to Appendix 2 for vegetation plot photographs and the vegetation
condition assessment table and Appendix 3 for vegetation data tables.
1.2.2 Vegetation Areas of Concern
Invasive species at Catfish Pond have been greatly reduced by past treatments throughout the site.
However, Wildlands recognizes that multiple treatments are typically needed for effective invasive plant
control. Scattered stems of Chinese Privet (Ligustrum sinensis), Princess tree (Paulownia tomentosa) and
Tree of Heaven (Ailanthus altissima) were treated in September 2021. These areas will be monitored
and retreated as necessary. Additionally, sporadic areas of re -sprouting multiflora rose (Rosa multiflora),
Chinese privet (Ligustrum sinense), and Japanese honeysuckle (Lonicera japonica) will be addressed in
MY3 using a combination of methods including mechanical removal as well as foliar and cut stump
applications.
1.2.3 Stream Assessment
Morphological surveys for MY2 were conducted in April and October 2021. Streams within the Site are
stable and functioning. Most cross -sections at the Site show minimal change in the bankfull cross -
sectional area and width -to -depth ratio. Bank height ratios are 1.2 or less. Entrenchment ratios are over
1.4 for B channels and at least 2.2 for C channels. Cross-section 1, 2, 3, 5, and 6 graphs show slight
deviations from as -built due to sediment deposition and establishment of vegetation. Some sediment
deposition in pools is natural and expected. Cross -sections 4 and 7 are discussed below in Section 1.2.4.
Reachwide substrate measurements indicate the maintenance of coarser materials in the riffle reaches
and finer particles in the pools. Visual inspection does not indicate reachwide vertical instability so
longitudinal profile surveys are not required. Refer to Appendix 2 for the Visual Stability Assessment
Table, Integrated Current Condition Plan View map, and Stream Photographs. Refer to Appendix 4 for
the morphological data and plots.
1.2.4 Stream Areas of Concern
Riffle material along the stream bed in portions of the Catfish Creek Reach 6 was washed downstream
during the winter of 2020/2021. During construction, bedrock was discovered beneath the old pond bed
and adjustments to design were made. The riffle material that was placed on the bedrock did not hold.
However, the bedrock streambed is stable and Wildlands proposes to leave the reach as it is now. The
location is shown in Figure 3a, the length of stream channel affected is shown in Table 5b, and bedrock
photographs are included in Stream Areas of Concern Photographs in Appendix 2.
Additionally, erosion and degradation was noticed in the stream channel around cross-section 7 on UT1
Reach 3 after the 2020/2021 winter rains. A small section of the stream was stabilized and repaired in
July. The cross-section was re -surveyed in October 2021. Cross-section 7 dimensions on the Cross -
Section Plots and in Table 12d in Appendix 4 differ slightly from As -Built and MYO dimensions but this is
to be expected after repairs were made. The stream channel is now stable and functioning, but
Catfish Pond Mitigation Site
460 Monitoring Year 2 Annual Report - FINAL 1-3

Wildlands will continue to observe the area to confirm stability. The location is shown in Figure 3b, the
length of stream repaired is shown in Table 5d, and stream channel photographs from pre and post
repair are included in Stream Areas of Concern Photographs in Appendix 2.
1.2.5 Hydrology Assessment
By the end of MY7, four or more bankfull events must have occurred in separate years within the
restoration reaches. Three bankfull events were recorded on UT1 Reach 2 and no bankfull events were
recorded on Catfish Creek Reach 6 in MY2. The lack of bankfull readings on Catfish Creek Reach 6 may
be due to a combination of factors including fewer large rainfall events in 2021, timing of transducer
readings, and the shape of the channel at the location of the crest gauge. Wildlands intends to install
another crest gauge along Catfish Creek to investigate. Refer to Appendix 5 for hydrologic data.
1.2.6 Wetland Assessment
As requested by NCDWR, four groundwater wells with pressure transducers were installed and
monitored within the existing wetlands zones (one along Catfish Creek Reach 4 and three along UT1
Reach 2). The purpose of these gauges is to assess potential effects to wetland hydrology from the
construction of the restored stream channels. The monitoring results are not tied to performance
standards. All gauges are downloaded and maintained quarterly.
The measured hydroperiod ranged from 19.1% (49 days) to 34.0% (87 days) of the growing season.
Refer to Appendix 5 for wetland hydrology data.
1.2.7 Adaptive Management Plan
Follow up treatments for the scattered Chinese privet, multiflora rose, and Japanese honeysuckle are
scheduled for MY3. Wildlands will continue to monitor and control invasive species at the Site during
subsequent monitoring years.
Trees planted in areas of competition with pasture grasses including tall fescue and Johnston grass are
being observed closely. Trees planted in these areas received herbicide ring sprays around the base of
their stems after planting and appear to be thriving and competing well with the pasture grasses. For
the trees to continue to outcompete the remaining pasture grasses, additional 18"-30" herbicide ring
sprays will be applied around the base of planted stems at the beginning of the MY3 growing season.
Wildlands will continue to monitor sections of Catfish Creek Reach 6 and UT1 Reach 3 for signs of
instability, but no further action is necessary at this time since the areas appear stable.
1.3 Monitoring Year 2 Summary
Vegetation across the Site is exceeding performance standards and is on track to achieve the MY3
interim requirement of 320 planted stems per acre. Monitoring Year 2 data shows an average density of
540 planted stems per acre across vegetation plots. In addition, desirable volunteer species such as
American persimmon (Diospyros virginiana) and tulip poplar (Liriodendron tulipifera) are establishing
themselves. Sporadic invasive vegetation was treated in September 2021 and follow up treatments are
scheduled for Monitoring Year 3. To build on the success of previous herbicide ring sprays, additional
ring sprays will be applied around the base of trees in areas of high competition with herbaceous
vegetation in spring 2022. Project streams are stable and functioning. Cross -sections 1, 2, 3, 5, and 6
show limited deviations from as -built due to sediment deposition and vegetation establishment. An area
of erosion around cross-section 7 was identified and repaired in MY2. The riffle material around cross-
section 4 was washed away leaving bedrock. Both cross -sections are stable but Wildlands will continue
to monitor their condition in MY3. A bankfull event was documented on UT1 Reach 2 during MY2.
Catfish Pond Mitigation Site
Monitoring Year 2 Annual Report - FINAL 1-4

Summary information and data related to the performance of various project and monitoring elements
can be found in the tables and figures in the report appendices. Narrative background and supporting
information formerly found in these reports can be found in the Mitigation Plan (Wildlands, 2019)
available on DMS's website. All raw data supporting the tables and figures in the appendices are
available from DIMS upon request.
Catfish Pond Mitigation Site
lillIIWO Monitoring Year 2 Annual Report - FINAL 1-5

Section 2: METHODOLOGY
Geomorphic data was collected following the standards outlined in The Stream Channel Reference Site:
An Illustrated Guide to Field Techniques (Harrelson et al., 1994) and in Stream Restoration: A Natural
Channel Design Handbook (Doll et al., 2003). Integrated Current Condition View mapping for MY2 was
recorded using a Garmin GLO receiver with 3-meter accuracy and processed using ArcGIS. Pressure
transducers were installed in riffle cross -sections to measure bankfull events and were monitored
throughout the year. Hydraulic monitoring instrument installation and monitoring methods are in
accordance with the Wilmington District Stream and Wetland Compensatory Mitigation Update,
released by the North Carolina Interagency Review Team (NCIRT, 2016). Vegetation monitoring
protocols followed the Carolina Vegetation Survey-EEP Level 2 Protocol (Lee et al., 2008).
Catfish Pond Mitigation Site
lilllWO Monitoring Year 2 Annual Report - FINAL 2-1

Section 3: REFERENCES
Breeding, R. 2010. Neuse River Basin Restoration Priorities. North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement
Program. Accessed at:
https://files.nc.gov/ncdeq/Mitigation%20Services/Watershed_Planning/Neuse_River_Basin/FINAL%
20RBRP% 20Neuse%202010_%2020111207%2000 RRECTED. pdf
Doll, B.A., Grabow, G.L., Hall, K.A., Halley, J., Harman, W.A., Jennings, G.D., and Wise, D.E. 2003. Stream
Restoration A Natural Channel Design Handbook.
Harrelson, C.C; Rawlins, C.L.; Potyondy, John P. 1994. Stream Channel Reference Sites: An Illustrated
Guide to Field Technique. Gen. Tech. Rep. RM-245. Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Department of Agriculture,
Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station. Accessed at:
https://www.fs.fed.us/biology/nsaec/fishxing/fplibrary/Harrelson_1994_Stream_Channel_Reference
_Sites_An_IIIustrated. pdf
Lee, M.T., Peet, R.K., Roberts, S.D., & Wentworth, T.R. 2008. CVS-EEP Protocol for Recording Vegetation
Version 4.2. Accessed at: http://cvs.bio.unc.edu/protocol/cvs-eep-protocol-v4.2-lev1-2.pdf
North Carolina Interagency Review Team (NCIRT). 2016. Wilmington District Stream and Wetland
Compensatory Mitigation Update. Accessed at: https://saw-
reg.usace.army.m i I/PN/2016/Wilmi ngton-District-M itigation-Update.pdf
Rosgen, D.L. 1994. A classification of natural rivers. Catena 22:169-199.
Rosgen, D.L. 1996. Applied River Morphology. Pagosa Springs, CO: Wildland Hydrology Books.
United States Geological Survey. 1998. North Carolina Geology. Accessed at:
http://www.geology.enr.state.nc.us/usgs/carolina.htm
Wildlands Engineering, Inc. 2019. Catfish Pond Mitigation Site Mitigation Plan. DMS, Raleigh, NC.
Catfish Pond Mitigation Site
lilllWO Monitoring Year 2 Annual Report - FINAL 3-1

APPENDIX 1. General Figures and Tables

Project Location
-- —I County Boundary
_ ! Hydrologic Unit Code (14-Digit)
Targeted Local Watershed
Timterlike 1 ��
03020201010010 ; tL.
1 / 1
— —_— — --------.._.._.._.._.._.._�
r
03020201020010
03020201020020
03020201030030
03020201010040
.✓\jc'r
'PERSON
DURHAM..—.
LIB Illi• I i I 03020201010030
l
�!
N. bo r„
1
1
_
03020201020040
03020201020030
The subject project site is an environmental restoration site of the
NCDEQ Division of Mitigation Services (DMS) and is
encompassed by a recorded conservation easement, but is
bordered by land under private ownership. Accessing the site may
require traversing areas near or along the easement boundary and
therefore access by the general public is not permitted. Access by
authorized personnel of state and federal agencies or their
designees/contractors involved in the development, oversight,
and stewardship of the restoration site is permitted within the terms
and timeframes of their defined roles. Any intended site visitation or
activity by any person outside of these previously sanctioned roles
and activites requires prior coordination with DMS.
WILDLANDS
� &V ENGINEERING
r
1
1
1
1
03020101010020
�
I
ter'
j
.......................
•••••
�
03020201040'10
I
I�
I�
03020201010050
J I
I
1
03020201040020
r
i J
I Z
Directions:
From Raleigh, NC, take 1-40 West towards Durham.
Take exit 279B for NC-147 N towards Durham/Downtown.
Travel approximately 8 miles and exit onto Duke Street.
Merge onto South Duke Street and continue 4.3 miles until
South Duke Street merges with US-501 N/N Roxboro Street.
Travel north on US-501 N/N Roxboro Street for 7.5 miles.
Make a U-turn and travel south on N Roxboro Street for 0.2
miles, turn right on the first gravel road. Drive approximately
0.2 miles and take the first right onto another gravel road.
The Site is located at the end of the gravel road.
Figure 1. Project Vicinity Map
0 1 2 Miles Catfish Pond Mitigation Site
I I I I I DMS Project No. 100039
Monitoring Year 2 — 2021
Durham County, NC

F '
Project Location
�— —Conservation Easement
Internal Crossing
® Existing Wetland
—Stream Restoration
Stream Enhancement II
Non-Project/Not for Credit Stream
Fence
0• Reach Break
t 4
4
0� L
1A
"•tip � I � � ��.:.{_� �
4N
try
ft,,WILDLANDS
ENGINEERING
i
4.
`A$
4
Figure 2. Project Component/Asset Map
0 250 500 Feet Catfish Pond Mitigation Site
I i I I I DMS Project No. 100039
Monitoring Year 2 — 2021
Durham County, NC

Table 1. Mitigation Assets and Components
Catfish Pond Mitigation Site
DMS Project No. 100039
Monitoring Year 2 - 2021
Mitigation
Mitigation
Reach ID Existing
Plan
Mitigation
Restoration
Level
Ratio
As-BuPriority
Credits
Comments
Footage
Category
Level
Footage
Footage
(SMU)
Footage
(X.1)
STREAMS
Catfish Creek Reach 1
W115
115
Warm
Ell
N/A
2.5
115
46.000
Invasive Control, Conservation Easement
Invasive Control, Grade Control Structures,
Catfish Creek Reach 2
323
323
Warm
Ell
N/A
2.5
323
129.200
Planted Buffer, Livestock Exclusion
Invasive Control, Grade Control Structures,
Catfish Creek Reach 3
474
473
Warm
Ell
N/A
2.5
474
189.200
Planted Buffer, Livestock Exclusion
Full Channel Restoration, Planted Buffer,
Catfish Creek Reach 4
369
374
Warm
R
Pi
1.0
373
374.000
Livestock Exclusion
Culvert Crossing
Grade Control Structures, Planted Buffer,
Catfish Creek Reach 5
459
460
Warm
Ell
N/A
2.5
460
184.000
Livestock Exclusion, Conservation Easement
Catfish Creek Reach 6
466
454*
Warm
R
PI
1.0
444
454.000
Full Channel Restoration, Planted Buffer,
Livestock Exclusion, Farm Pond Drained
Invasive Control, Grade Control Structures,
Catfish Creek Reach 7
1,087
1,071*
Warm
Ell
N/A
2.5
1,087
428.400
Planted Buffer, Livestock Exclusion
Invasive Control, Planted Buffer, Livestock
307
263
Warm
Ell
N/A
2.5
263
105.200
Exclusion
UT1 Reach 1
Culvert Crossing
Invasive Control, Planted Buffer, Livestock
717
717
Warm
Ell
N/A
2.5
711
286.800
Exclusion
Full Channel Restoration, Planted Buffer,
UTl Reach 2
430
515
Warm
R
PI
1.0
520
515.000
Livestock Exclusion
Culvert Crossing
UT1 Reach 3
154
149
Warm
R
P2
1.0
149
149.000
Full Channel Restoration, Planted Buffer,
Livestock Exclusion
Invasive Control, Planted Buffer, Livestock
UT1 Reach 4
447
446
Warm
Ell
N/A
2.5
446
178.400
Exclusion
Invasive Control, Grade Control Structures,
UT2
412
412
Warm
Ell
N/A
2.5
412
164.800
Livestock Exclusion
Invasive Control, Grade Control Structures,
Mountain Tributary
62
1,362
1 Warm
Ell
N/A
2.5
1,362
544.1007
Planted Buffer, Livestock Exclusion
-Due to a stationing error in the Mitigation Plan, linear feet and associated credits were overestimated on Catfish Creek Reach 6 and underestimated on Reach 7 for a net overage of 10.6 SMUs. Stream credits were calculated using
Mitigation Plan footage because the 10.6 SM Us represent only 0.28% of the total stream credits.
Restoration Level
Stream
Riparian Wetland
Non -Riparian
Wetland
Coastal
Marsh
Warm
Cool
Cold
Riverine
Non-Riverine
Restoration
1,492.000
Enhancement
Enhancement II
2,256.800
Preservation
Re -Establishment
Rehabilitation
Enhancement
Creation
Total-
3,748.800
^Credits have been adjusted to include changes in stream alignment on Catfish Creek Reach 6 due to bedrock in the flood plain.

Table 2. Project Activity and Reporting History
Catfish Pond Mitigation Site
DMS Project No. 100039
Monitoring Year 2 - 2021
Activity or Report
Mitigation Plan
Data Collection Complete
July 2019
Completion or Scheduled Delivery
July 2019
Final Design - Construction Plans
August 2019
August 2019
Construction
February -March 2020
March 2020
Temporary S&E mix applied to entire project areal
March 2020
March 2020
Permanent seed mix applied to reach/segments'
April 2020
April 2020
Bare root and live stake plantings for reach/segments
March 2020
March 2020
Baseline Monitoring Document (Year 0)
Stream Survey
March -April 2020
June 2020
Vegetation Survey
March 2020
Competitive Vegetation Treatment2
April -May 2020
Invasive Vegetation Treatment
May & September 2020
Year 1 Monitoring
Stream Survey
October 2020
December 2020
Vegetation Survey
October 2020
Stream channel repairs on UT1 Reach 3
July 2021
Invasive Vegetation Treatment
September 2021
Year 2 Monitoring
Stream Survey
April & October 2021
December 2021
Vegetation Survey
September 2021
Year 3 Monitoring
Stream Survey
2022
December 2022
Vegetation Survey
2022
Year 4 Monitoring
December 2023
Year 5 Monitoring
Stream Survey
2024
December 2024
Vegetation Survey
2024
Year 6 Monitoring
December 2025
Year 7 Monitoring
Stream Survey
December 2026
Vegetation Survey
'Seed and mulch is added as each section of construction is completed.
Herbicide ring sprays around the base of planted stems.
Table 3. Project Contact Table
Catfish Pond Mitigation Site
DMS Project No. 100039
Monitoring Year 2 - 2021
Wildlands Engineering, Inc.
Designer
497 Bramson Ct, Suite 104
Daniel Johnson, PE
Mt. Pleasant, SC 29464
843.277.6221
Main Stream Earthwork, Inc.
Construction Crew
631 Camp Dan Valley Rd
Reidsville, NC 27320
Bruton Natural Systems, Inc
Planting Contractor
P.O. Box 1197
Fremont, NC 27830
Canady's Landscaping & Erosion
Seeding Contractor
256 Fairview Acres Rd
Lexington, NC 27295
Seed Mix Sources
Garrett Wildflower Seed Farm
1591 Cleveland Rd
Smithfield, NC 27577
Ernst Conservation Seeds, Inc.
8884 Mercer Pike
Meadville, PA 16335
Nursery Stock Suppliers
Dykes and Sons Nursery and Greenhouse
Bare Roots
825 Maude Etter Rd
McMinnville, TN 37110
Live Stakes
Bruton Natural Systems, Inc
Foggy Mountain Nursery
797 Helton Creek Rd
Lansing, NC 28643
Monitoring Performers
Wildlands Engineering, Inc.
Monitoring, POC
Jason Lorch
919.851.9986

Table 4. Project Information and Attributes
Catfish Pond Mitigation Site
DMS Project No. 100039
Monitoring Year 2 - 2021
PROJECT INFORMATION
Project Name lCatfish Pond Mitigation Site
County Durham County
Project Coordinates (latitude and longitude) 36- 9' 48.03" N, 78- 54' 37.66" W
Project Area (acres) 20.73
Planted Acreage (acres of woody stems planted) 8.00
PROJECT WATERSHED SUMMARY INFORMATION
Physiographic Province Carolina Slate Belt of the Piedmont Physiographic Province
River Basin
Neuse River
USGS Hydrologic Unit 8-digit
03020201
USGS Hydrologic Unit 14-digit
03020201020040
DWR Sub -basin
03-04-01
Project Drainiage Area (acres)
227 (Catfish Creek - 197, Mountain Tributary - 30)
Project Drainage Area Percentage of Impervious Area
0.0%
CGIA Land Use Classification
REACH
Parameters
769/6forested, 54.2%cultivated, 0.2%wetland
SUMMARY INFORMATION
Catfish Creek
R1
R2
R3
R4
R5
R6
R7
Length of Reach (linear feet) - Post -Restoration
115
323
474
373
460
444
1,087
Valley Confinement (confined, moderately confined, unconfined)
Confined
Confined
Confined
Unconfined
Moderately
Confined
Moderately
Confined
Moderately
Confined
Drainage Area (acres)
17
17
53
56
61
70
197
Perennial, Intermittent, Ephemeral
I
P
P
P
P
P
P
NCDWR Stream Identification Score
35.00
3FO-0
45.25
---
I ---
---
NCDWR Water Quality Classification
WS-II/HQW/NSW
Morphological Description (stream type) - Pre -Restoration
E5b/E4b
E5b/E4b
E4
Incised E6
C4b
N/A
C4b
Morphological Description (stream type) - Post -Restoration
E5b/E4b
E5b/E4b
E4
C4
C4b
134a
C4b
Evolutionary Trend (Simon's Model) - Pre -Restoration
IV
IV
IV
IV
IV
N/A
V
FEMA Classification
None
Zone AE
Parameters
UTl
UT2
Mountain Tributary
R1
R2
R3
R4
Length of Reach (linear feet) - Post -Restoration
974
520
149
446
412
1,362
Valley Confinement (confined, moderately confined, unconfined)
Unconfined
Moderately
Confined
Moderately
Confined
Confined
Confined
Moderately Confined
Drainage Area (acres)
75
105
107
108
32
30
Perennial, Intermittent, Ephemeral
P
P
P
P
I
I
NCDWR Stream Identification Score
31.50
26.00
26.00
NCDWR Water Quality Classification
WS-II/HQW/NSW
Morphological Description (stream type) - Pre -Restoration
E4
C6
E4b
E4b
C3b/C4b
E4b
Morphological Description (stream type) - Post -Restoration
E4
C4
I 134a
E4b
C3b/C4b
E4b
Evolutionary Trend (Simon's Model) - Pre -Restoration
IV
V
IV
IV
IV
IV
FEMA Classification
REGULATORY•
Regulation
None
• •
Applicable Resolved Supporting Documentation
Waters of the United States - Section 404
Yes
Yes
USACE Nationwide Permit No. 27 and DWQ 401 Water Quality
Certification No. 4134.
Waters of the United States - Section 401
Yes
Yes
Division of Land Quality (Dam Safety)
N/A
N/A
N/A
Endangered Species Act
Yes
Yes
Catfish Pond Mitigation Plan; per the Categorical Exclusion research
and response by US Fish and Wildlife Service the "proposed action
[in this project] is not likely to adversely affect any federally listed
endangered or threatened species, their formally designated critical
habitat, or species currently proposed for listing under the Act."
Historic Preservation Act
Yes
Yes
Correspondence from SHPO on March 5, 2018 stated they were
aware of "no historic resources which would be affected by the
project."
Coastal Zone Management Act (CZMA)/Coastal Area Management
Act (CAMA)
N/A
N/A
N/A
FEMA Floodplain Compliance
Yes
Yes
Durham County Floodplain Development Permit No. 19800041 was
obtained on October 7, 2019.
Essential Fisheries Habitat
N/A
N/A
I N/A
( --- ): Data was not provided.

APPENDIX 2. Visual Assessment Data

on
v
C

r
;1 \
GO
i
r
v
v
-0

a a
v v
� L V
fl o
v �
z°
N a v
N N V > l7
N O E
X u
v a w ._ 3
o o
v i= `m, E C u A O m lY7 a O O
'o °1 - m °1 > °1 v v
a V - w v V E V Z
0 0 I I I v I 0
1 1
1
g;
v
on
v

Table Sa. Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment Table
Catfish Pond Mitigation Site
DMS Project No. 100039
Monitoring year 2 - 2021
Caffish Creek Reach 4 (373 LF)
amnle
Farleg
- or,
1. Bed
Stable, Total Number
PChannel Sub -Category Metric
Performingas inAs-Built
Intended
1. Vertical Stability Aegradation
Number of Amount of S,m
Unstable Unstable Perfor
Segments Footage Intended
0 0 100%
"Woo dy 'A ood, d
(Riffle and Run Units) Degradation
0 0 100%
2. Riffle Condition Texture/Substrate 7
7
100%
100%
3. Meander Pool Depth Sufficient 7
7
Condition Length Appropriate 7
100%
7
100%
Thalweg centering at upstream of 7
7
4. Thalweg Position meander bend Run
7
Thalweg centering at downstream of 7
100%
meander bend Glide
2. Bank
Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting
1.Scoured/Eroded
simply from poor growth and/or scour
0
0
100%
n/a
n/a
n/a
and erosion.
Banks undercut/overhanging to the
extent that mass wasting appears likely.
2. Undercut
Does NOT include undercuts that are
0
0
100%
n/a
n/a
n/a
modest, appear sustainable and are
providing habitat.
3. Mass Wasting
Bank slumping, caving, or collapse.
0
0
100%
n/a
n/a
n/a
Totals
0
0
100%
n/a
n/a
n/a
3. Engineered
Structures'
Structures physically intact with no
1. Overall Integrity
dislodged boulders or logs.
0
0
N/A
2. Grade Control
Grade control structures exhibiting
0
0
N/A
maintenance of grade across the sill.
2a. Piping
Structures lacking any substantial flow
0
0
N/A
underneath sills or arms.
Bank erosion within the structures
3. Bank Protection
extent of influence does not exceed
4
4
100%
15%.
Pool forming structures maintaining
'"Max Pool Depth : Bankfull Depth >_ 1.6
4. Habitat
Rootwads/logs providing some cover at
4
4
100%
baseflow.
'Excludes constructed riffles since they are evaluated in section 1.

Table 5b. Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment Table
Catfish Pond Mitigation Site
DMS Project No. 100039
Monitoring year 2 - 2021
Caffish Creek Reach 6 (444 LF)
amnle
Farleg
1. Bed
Kbannel Sub -Category
1. Vertical Stability
Number
Metric Stable, Total Number
Performing as in A�Built
Aegradation
Number of Amount of Sta 1, �Ine'
Unstable Unstable Pe%for. g.
Segments Footage Intended
0 0 100%
Nurnlerwill F..tage.ith Adjust % for
Stabili,zing Stabilbing StabilWng
V Wood Woody Woody
(Riffle and Run Units)
Degradation
2 100.64 77%
2. Riffle Condition
Texture/Substrate 12
14
66%
100%
3. Meander Pool
Depth Sufficient 15
15
Condition
100%
Length Appropriate 15
15
100%
Thalweg centering at upstream of 14
14
4. Thalweg Position
meander bend Run
Thalweg centering at downstream of 15
15
100%
meander bend Glide
2. Bank
Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting
1.Scoured/Eroded
simply from poor growth and/or scour
0
0
100%
n/a
n/a
n/a
and erosion.
Banks undercut/overhanging to the
extent that mass wasting appears likely.
2. Undercut
Does NOT include undercuts that are
0
0
100%
n/a
n/a
n/a
modest, appear sustainable and are
providing habitat.
3. Mass Wasting
Bank slumping, calving, or collapse
0
0
100%
n/a
n/a
n/a
Totals
0
0
100%
n/a
n/a
n/a
3. Engineered
Structures'
Structures physically intact with no
1. Overall Integrity
dislodged boulders or logs.
1
1
100%
2. Grade Control
Grade control structures exhibiting
1
1
100%
maintenance of grade across the sill.
2a. Piping
Structures lacking any substantial flow
1
1
100%
underneath sills or arms.
Bank erosion within the structures
3. Bank Protection
extent of influence does not exceed
0
0
N/A
15%.
Pool forming structures maintaining
4. Habitat
'"Max Pool Depth : Bankfull Depth >_ 1.6
0
0
N/A
Rootwads/logs providing some cover at
baseflow.
'Excludes constructed riffles since they are evaluated in section 1.

Table Sc. Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment Table
Catfish Pond Mitigation Site
DMS Project No. 100039
Monitoring year 2 - 2021
Ilismt =111rI69Ir71it
I. C
FhamnJelJC
Carle,
1. Bed
Number
hannel Sub -Category Metric Stable Total Number
Performin'g as in As -Built
1. Vertical Stability Aegradation
Number of Amount of . Sr
Unstable Unstable P c"o minj
Segments Footage Intended
0 0 100%
utbe';,with Footage.ith Adjust % for
INS , ing St�bflb ng I St�b., r" n,
V Woody odi o d
(Riffle and Run Units) Degradation
0 0 100%
2. Riffle Condition Texture/Substrate 10
10
100%
100%
3. Meander Pool Depth Sufficient 10
10
Condition Length Appropriate 10
100%
10
100%
Thalweg centering at upstream of 10
10
4. Thalweg Position mender bend Run
10
Thaalweg centering at downstream of 10
100%
meander bend Glide
2. Bank
Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting
1.Scoured/Eroded
simply from poor growth and/or scour
0
0
100%
n/a
n/a
n/a
and erosion.
Banks undercut/overhanging to the
extent that mass wasting appears likely.
2. Undercut
Does NOT include undercuts that are
0
0
100%
n/a
n/a
n/a
modest, appear sustainable and are
providing habitat.
3. Mass Wasting
Bank slumping, calving, or collapse
0
0
100%
n/a
n/a
n/a
Totals
0
0
100%
n/a
n/a
n/a
3. Engineered
Structures'
1. Overall Integrity
Structures physically intact with no
0
0
N/A
dislodged boulders or logs.
2. Grade Control
Grade control structures exhibiting
0
0
N/A
maintenance of grade across the sill.
2a. Piping
Structures lacking any substantial flow
0
0
N/A
underneath sills or arms.
Bank erosion within the structures
3. Bank Protection
extent of influence does not exceed
2
2
100%
15%.
Pool forming structures maintaining
4. Habitat
-Max Pool Depth : Bankfull Depth >_ 1.6
2
2
100%
Rootwads/logs providing some cover at
baseflow.
'Excludes constructed riffles since they are evaluated in section 1.

Table Sd. Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment Table
Catfish Pond Mitigation Site
DIMS Project No. 100039
Monitoring Year 2 - 2021
UTl Reach 3 (149 LF)
11 4aj.,C 7a.nell
Category
1. Bed
Channel Sub -Category Metric
1. Vertical Stability Aggradation
Stable, Total Number
Performing as in As -Built
Intended
mo t 0]
Unstable Unstable
Segments '.0'...
0 0
Performing a
' ' s
Intended
100%
Stabilizing Stabilizing Stabilizin
Woody Woody Woody
Vegetation Vegetation Vegetatio
(Riffle and Run Units) Degradation
1 18.16
88%
2. Riffle Condition Texture/Substrate
2
3
67%
3. Meander Pool Depth Sufficient
4
4
100%
Condition Length Appropriate
4
4
100%
Thalweg centering at upstream of
4. Thalweg Position meander bend Run
Thalweg centering at downstream of
meander bend Glide
4
4
100%
4
4
100%
2. Bank
Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting
1. Scoured/Eroded
simplyfrom poor growth and/or scour
0
0
100%
n/a
n/a
n/a
and erosion.
Banks undercut/overhanging to the
extentthat mass wasting appears likely.
2. Undercut
Does NOT include undercuts that are
0
0
100%
n/a
n/a
n/a
modest, appear sustainable and are
providing habitat.
3. Mass Wasting
Bank slumping, calving, or collapse
0
0
100%
n/a
n/a
n/a
Totals
0
0
100%
n/a
n/a
n/a
3. Engineered
Structures'
1. Overall Integrity
Structures physically intact with no
dislodged boulders or logs.
0
0
N/A
2. Grade Control
Grade control structures exhibiting
maintenance of grade across the sill.
0
0
N/A
2a. Piping
Structures lacking any substantial flow
underneath sills or arms.
0
0
N/A
Bank erosion within the structures
3. Bank Protection
extent of influence does not exceed
0
0
N/A
15%.
Pool forming structures maintaining
4. Habitat
'"Max Pool Depth : Bank -full Depth >_ 1.6
Rootwads/logs providing some cover at
0
0
N/A
baseflow.
'Excludes constructed riffles since they are evaluated in section 1.

Table 6. Vegetation Condition Assessment Table
Catfish Pond Mitigation Site
DMS Project No. 100039
Monitoring Year 2 - 2021
Planted Acreage 8.00
Vegetation Category
Mapping Numberof
Definitions Threshold
Polygons
Combined
Acreage
%of
Planted
Acreage
(Ac)
Very limited cover of both woody and herbaceous
Bare Areas
0.1
0
0
0%
material.
Woody stem densities clearly below target levels
Low Stem Density Areas
0.1
0
0
0%
based on MY3, 4, or 5 stem count criteria.
Total
0
0
0%
Areas of Poor Growth
Areas with woody stems of a size class that are
0.25 Ac
0
0
0%
Rates or Vigor
obviously small given the monitoring year.
Cumulative Total
0
0.0
0%
Easement Acreage 20.73
Areas of points (if too small to render as polygons at
Invasive Areas of Concern 1,000 0 0 0%
map scale).
Areas of points (if too small to render as polygons at
Easement Encroachment Areas none 0 0 0%
map scale).

STREAM PHOTOGRAPHS

PHOTO POINT 1 Catfish Creek R1— upstream (0410212021) 1 PHOTO POINT 1 Catfish Creek 111— downstream (0410212021) 1
PHOTO POINT 2 Catfish Creek R2 — downstream (0410212021)
PHOTO POINT 3 Catfish Creek R3 — downstream (0410212021)
Catfish Pond Mitigation Site
Appendix 2: Visual Assessment Data — Stream Photographs

PHOTO POINT 4 Catfish Creek R4 — upstream (0410212021) I PHOTO POINT 4 Catfish Creek R4 —downstream (0410212021)
PHOTO POINT 5 Catfish Creek R5 — upstream (0410212021)
PHOTO POINT 6 Catfish Creek R6 — upstream (0410212021)
PHOTO POINT 5 Catfish Creek R5 — downstream (0410212021)
PHOTO POINT 6 Catfish Creek R6 — downstream (0410212021)
Catfish Pond Mitigation Site
Appendix 2: Visual Assessment Data — Stream Photographs

PHOTO POINT 7 Catfish Creek R7 — upstream (0410212021)
a
PHOTO POINT 9 Catfish Creek R7 — upstream (0410212021)
PHOTO POINT 7 Catfish Creek R7 — downstream (0410212021)
PHOTO POINT 8 Catfish Creek R7 — downstream (0410212021)
PHOTO POINT 9 Catfish Creek R7 — downstream (0410212021)
Catfish Pond Mitigation Site
Appendix 2: Visual Assessment Data — Stream Photographs

PHOTO POINT 10 UT1 R1— upstream (0410212021)
il
PHOTO POINT 11 UT1 R1— upstream (0410212021)
PHOTO POINT 10 UT1 R1— downstream (0410212021)
PHOTO POINT 11 UT1 R1— downstream 10410212021)
PHOTO POINT 12 UT1 R1— downstream (0410212021) 1
Catfish Pond Mitigation Site
Appendix 2: Visual Assessment Data — Stream Photographs

PHOTO POINT 13 UT1 R2 — upstream (0410212021)
PHOTO POINT 13 UT1 R2 — downstream (0410212021)
PHOTO POINT 14 UT1 R2 — upstream (0410212021) 1 PHOTO POINT 14 UT1 R2 — downstream (0410212021) 1
PHOTO POINT 15 UT1 R3 — upstream (0410212021)
PHOTO POINT 15 UT1 R3 — downstream (0410212021) 1
Catfish Pond Mitigation Site
Appendix 2: Visual Assessment Data — Stream Photographs

PHOTO POINT 16 UT1 R4 — upstream (0410212021) 1 PHOTO POINT 16 UT1 R4 — downstream (0410212021) 1
PHOTO POINT 17 UT2 — upstream (0410212021)
PHOTO POINT 18 Mountain Trib — upstream (0410212021)
PHOTO POINT 17 UT2 — downstream (0410212021)
PHOTO POINT 18 Mountain Trib — downstream (0410212021) 1
Catfish Pond Mitigation Site
Appendix 2: Visual Assessment Data — Stream Photographs

PHOTO POINT 19 Mountain Trib — upstream (0410212021) 1 PHOTO POINT 19 Mountain Trib — downstream (0410212021) 1
PHOTO POINT 20 Mountain Trib — upstream (0410212021) I PHOTO POINT 20 Mountain Trib — downstream (0410212021) I
Catfish Pond Mitigation Site
Appendix 2: Visual Assessment Data — Stream Photographs

STREAM AREAS OF CONCERN PHOTOGRAPHS

Catfish Creek R6 XS4 downstream —
Area of Bedload Movement (Bedrock) (1111812021)
%.QL11J11 Id CCR no AJ'i IdLIII6 I I6IIL UQI IK —
Area of Bedload Movement (Bedrock) (1111812021)
Catfish Pond Mitigation Site
Appendix 2: Visual Assessment Data — Stream Areas of Concern Photographs

UT1 R3 upstream —
Area of Bedload Movement (Pre -Repair) (1012212020)
UT1 R3 upstream —
Area of Bedload Movement (Post -Repair) (1111812021)
Catfish Pond Mitigation Site
Appendix 2: Visual Assessment Data — Stream Areas of Concern Photographs

VEGETATION PLOT PHOTOGRAPHS

FIXED VEG PLOT 1(0912312021)
FIXED VEG PLOT 3 (0912312021)
FIXED VEG PLOT 5 (0912312021)
FIXED VEG PLOT 2 (0912312021)
FIXED VEG PLOT 4 (0912312021)
FIXED VEG PLOT 6 (0912312021)
1 % Catfish Pond Mitigation Site
W`O Appendix 2: Visual Assessment Data — Vegetation Plot Photographs

Ot Catfish Pond Mitigation Site
Appendix 2: Visual Assessment Data — Vegetation Plot Photographs

APPENDIX 3. Vegetation Plot Data

(1)
a
0
O
O
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
00
al
-A
N
M
Ln
lD
r�
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
d
d
GA
GA
GA
GA
GA
GA
GA
• >
>
>
>
>
>
>
E
E
O
O
aJ
aJ
aJ
aJ
aJ
aJ
O
O
LL
LL
U-
U-
U-
U-
U-
cg�
cg�
v
`u
7
v
Q
E
ai
aj
v
ca
Q
0
N
m
0
0
m
r
`o
a
a=
v
E
ai
a`ji
Lo
ca
E

(
/
\
\
�
§\
\}}
\
�\
77)[
2
8rEE«==�¥(\
£$r!))§(s«r
`e42g£(s5ra
?
)§
E-k§)/!§§//
/}(§u�u
F—
_{{�$\[//}\
-
\\�\\\\
\�
6,»g
..�-00
�)
-k®[k//}}
-�
b
\
In
\\
/\{I}/
=fEEEE
-
aeumu7
§
ƒ)))}}3aa<<
§\\w
�
B
;
S
k
;
CL
CL
k
\
r
|
a
=
�2�
0
\■Ja|)
-
J
§
�\��§%&_)
CL
Z]MC
;£o
t
2
��[[�aZ.2
-•2!§k)\$lLL;EEf§B##§E
-
&&&
�,,.�
i22aaE�2££m>>aaa£#�££a=

u
® e -4
j \ )
OD
0
\ 0
Ln 0.
@
9
m
m
q
z
\
>0.
a
m
0"C0.
r
-
m
\
z
w
�
r
=
-
-
®
-
$
_
}
a#
_
@
_
_
_
_
_
_
z
±
>
a
«
k
=
m
±
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
®
rq
\
rlj
re)
m
m
e/
-
w
m
-Im
q
z/
>/
j
)
e
r
c
e
z/
�
�
)
w
m
e�
-
m
q
z
j
a
_
/
#
^
e
^
"1
z
\
>
0.
o
z
CA
0
e
N4
I
JrOI
-
I
z
\
z
Lo
Lo
\
@
«
G
CA
0
I
#
#
e
=
«
/
a.
ui
E
37LU
§ § k
m k m
\
\
\
2 \ CL
9 w
E E
CL
§
�)
e
z
z
e
e
e=
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
z
e
e
k
/
�
J
u
E
&
\\
E
u
u
L
E
2
\\
»
3
»
f
\
\
j
o
e
y
/
/
°
®
/
a
2
E
\
§
§
}
/
\
»
»
e
\
)
.2
\
2
§
J
}
/
}
/
3
\
ƒ
/
&
\
/
\
\
\
j
\
)
rz
E
\
.4
\
(
�
\
\
$
~
%
'e
J
@
\
=
2
t2
,
G
§
/
,
f/
[
�
/
,
§
E
4
\
a
E
}
§
)
G
2
)
f
\
\
3±
E=
m
e
\\\
2\
2
t\)/\\\\
a
t
t
t
t
t±
§-
En2«
2
S
Q
Q
Qz
3
k
K
K
m=
3
=
a
0
0
0
0
0*
) E
0. e

N
N (n -4
c m N
O O N
0OD O1 N
O
U 0 a
rn
m
m
m
r-,o i
1
Ln
c-I
ti
c-I
�
r"
m
o
rl
Ln
O
N
—
m
O
io
O
O
a
m
m
O
r1
Ln
J
O
H
m
1O
m
m
In
O
c
m
mLn
a
H
•--�
Ol
rn
00
N
(O
m
m
�n
c
-.
c�-I
c�-I
c�-I
c�-I
Lo
N
N
—
m
r
m
Lo
m
m
Ln
Lo
m
Ln
m
O
n
m
a
m
m
o
Ln
3
c
J
Q
O
N
rn
1O
m
m
m
Ln
Ln
�
Lo
Lo
mr
c
a
.-I
Ln
N
m
-1
N
NM
rn
N
M
m
m
Ln
Ln
W
N
—
Ln
I"
m
m
N
M
m
W
mCA
Q1
O
N
n
O
c�
C
�--�
Ln
n
m Ln
m
N
Q1
m
Ln
00
Q1
C
a
H
N
i--I
N
-1
Lo
i--I
.--I
M
00
N
O
n
d
-1
N
O
—
f0
c-I
l0
Ln
N
N
>
d
rn
O
Ln
N
J
O
r1
�D
Ln
N
mC
a
Ln
o
rl
1-I
Lo
N
m
N
m
�
00
�
to
a
c
u
d
—
M
�--I
l0
N
m
N
c-I
N
O
m
l0
3
d
O
Ln
U
J
O
ri
Lo
N
m
N
Ln
Lo
C
Ln
v
ui
c in c
Q
7ui7
i U
v
v
v
Cj :6 U (i Q
N
N
4J
Q n L
N
N
H
H
N N
'V Q
CL
Q E
L
L
v
v
v
v
v
v
LJ
LJ
v
v
L
LJ
LJ
V1 N
Ln
Ln
W
Ln
!=
Y
N
O
�
E
O
N
m
Z
v
v
O
U
O
d
�
(6
N
O
Y
3
O
O
£
O_
CO
U
C
N
Q
a
O
C7
O_
O
o
f 6
O°
U
�
-O
C
O
U
D
30
_
Q
m
N
o
O
E
O
E
3
o
E
Y
o
C
OD
N
O_
U
O
U
Ln
Ln
Ln
Ln
m
°
rz
a
z
rzU
o
m
Z
a
s
.a
x
�
u
a
"a,
z-
a
z
°Q'
a
a
o
a
E
a
'a
a
r
c
m
rz
-0
arz
-a
—
E
a
Ln
°tea
o
a?
E
a
a
u
V1
Q
O
O
a
O
i
a
N
O
O
O
O
O
O'
`
°
a
•�
�
a
i
u
U
O
O
�
k
O
�
O
a.,
N
N
N
N
N•
K
w=
o16
'a
a
Q
Q
Q
m
Q
It
J
J
J
C7
C7
C7
C7
C7
Ln
0 0
0 0 0 �
Y
m f0 JL.+ Vl
� y
rL+ L1 >
C m N X
N w w
� N N r' E
g 6n Ea v
L N N .V
N y
N N � m
v v v m
E E v a
o o P
N m J
v o
w i @ > a
Jv+
a 1-

0 e
E / 0 )
E \ o
0 ¥ -
R ) k
g U _
k / \
§ £ / k
e J 0 2
?
k
r
«
-
»
_
_
#
-
\
=
5
Ln
§
r4
_
0
0
§
u
m
«
-
»
_
_
�
#
�Ln
e
\
_
\
m
0
k
N
e
r»_
e
e
r4
r_
\
c
0
w
}
§
\
a
�
)
0
)
§
w
�
e
r
»
_
e
_
r,
r
_
%
q
\
0
r
z
r«
c
e
j
\
rj\
Ln
§
r=
z
q
r«
e/
0
1-1
r
r«
e#
$
e§
_
rq
0)
§
a.
_
m
c
k
k
N
z
N_
r
e
z}
k
®
@
_
\
a
z
N
_
r
$
zCL
}
§
§
§ \ § /
§
®
®
■ g m
7�&CL
f
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
f
G E E
z
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
z
w
�
E
/
3
m
[
0
W
\
E
j
®
kco
\
7
\
}
\
ƒ
\
&
\
(
/
\
§
\
j
j
/
#
�
rz
m
«
E
m
\
2
a
-
•_
j
,
ƒ
\
/
,
)
/
,
\
±
>
k
ƒ
;
j
u
G
,)
\
j
&
\
E
\
\
±
\
±
\
2
\
\
\
}
\
k
§
§
§
§
§
-
/
{
/
(
(
(
(
(
(\
\
/
§
K
m

APPENDIX 4. Morphological Summary Data and Plots

X
O O
M O
m
-
~ L
A
o
o .4
vciv
o ry
no o-
u o
o0
�
" o
o
0
0
-
°'
00 0
0 ci
O
O n
p
Od
n
U
L_
�
O O
N O
N O
N
O
O O
M O
m
m
o o
o
z
o
^p
cD
p
O
a
m
m
x
^
0
m v
o o
M
O
o
o
s
"
U L
K
N O
n
p
N p
A
TTIp
cD
2
�J
Oo
wcD
N O
N
m
v1 O
n
m
O
O t+l
O
b
o
N
X
o
w
o
0 0
O
m
o
r U
c
U
N
O
,,.�
,n
m
v
U
ti
0lw
mm
0
3
o
F
ti
m
o o
m
o
o ry
m
o
0
O
Uo
x
w
cDU
O
r
^ N
N
O O
n6
r
6U
O
O
O
m .n
v n
m
m
6
cio
o
U
0p
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
olz
-z o
H
o mxw
m E
x
o
n-
?
a 3L
noL
l7 m
a
H.>.
mw
a°Ymw
c' w
= aw
mo>nom—
o=
Y
L
--
a
o
m
g
m
-
E
E
E
2m
m
a
Ln Y
y
t
°
c
3
£
`o
o
a

§)\
:;m:;m;:\
\
\\
}}}}};2§)
ci
;§§\
`
k
)
:;c5
;46
,
�zzzz
;
§
°
!
/
m
:
\
3
#
z
z z
§
\
)
�
-
z
z z
z z
/}
_
lo
,JR
/
;
a::m
�E|
:
2
TM
«k
}}}}}
!�
!
,«£«z
««t42«,aI
,
-
-3
}\\(\\{\\\
)2
!-
-
_
-_�-
-/)
-
:
)&;)!
j\k!!�\\
(!/
-
\-k
/
\
�
`�
\
§
_

N
r
r
v�
M
�
R
}
C
O
N
o
m
u
v
r
N0
m
�o
m
m
N
O
V
O
U
}
H
O
V
N
O
N
G1
m
m
v
v
v
O
M
O
M
N
O
CO
7
7
�
C6
G
C
U
C
V
N
1�
p
N
1p
V
l0
N
Cl
N
�
l0
O
N
l0
O
Uc}
N
W
O
Lq
O^
M
V1
C
V
V
V
V
N
m
V
c}c
O
O
M
O
CO
M
Ul
V
H
V
V
H
in
a
a
tt:
tt:
N
�
l0
C
C
O
O
N
O
O
W
m
H
n
N
O
O
to
O
t%1
t^o
V
l�o
'D
W
U
V
H
O
O
m
m
O
M
H
O
O
n
O
M
V1
C}
G
n
t�
H
V
l0
"o
lO
ID
C}
V
V
V
O,
Ca
O^
H
Lo
H
l0
'-I
V
a --I
W
G
t�O
a
v
v
a
v
V
v
r
0
=
0
0
a
a
}
}
O
O
N
Q
Q
H
1p
H
1p
O
M
N
Q
Q
N
Lq
V
N
m
m
U
U
Ln
Z
Z
O
LiM
O
U
�"�
Q
Q
Lo
Lp
lfl
H
Q
Q
N
V1
rn
H
^
N
C
z
Z
V
V
N
m
V
V
V
V
v1
Q
ID
M
CO
C
tO
Z
lD
'D
N
.�-�
C
V
Z
V
V
N
O
a
a
s
a
a
s
N
N
o
o
+•
N
N
O
O
Q
Q
m
m
s
Q
Q
m
m
t
m
~3
~w
N
.75
~w
N
N
O_
N
Y
Y
w
W
Q
Y
Y
W
W
Q
C
C
m
X
6
m
C
C
m
X
°
f6
m
m
3
f6
0
o
m
m
3
f6
0
. o
<
<
J
co
V
Ul
m
Q
m
Q
J
co
V
N
C
O
C
O
O
C
O
C
O
O
J
'n
O
O
O
U
O
U
m
m
m
m
m
m
O
.m
O
.m
0
C
OC
C
aC
O
O
m
s
m
L
N
w
Y
N
W
—
_Lw
N
Y
3 Y
c
m
c
o
m
3
Y
c
m
c
p
m

q
E
E
�
k
\
I
E
§
�
/
§
/
§
/
§
)
»\
cm�mR@R
xx
R
o-
z
Q
K
V
/
k
i
u
\
§
/�
k
_ «
c
m
R
m
m
y
R
x m
R
o-
®Q
K
V
/
k
i
§
q
o z
\
\ j f
rn
$
]
\
]
\
.
-
/
c@@
5
2
R
°
-\ 3»
7
\
R
o
4
e%
3-
u j R
ƒ K
6
\ e/
m
g
m
p °
e a
/
r
�
�
&
@
&
%
/
_
e
4-_
g
2
g
~
~/)
2
g
//
F//©©
Jƒ
\\/)))
f
f
:
x
=
®
/
/
w
j
(
%
/
2
=
-
/
�
\
e
e
ƒ
a
CO
A
\
#
t
\
ƒ
5
A
`
}
k
®
\
o
o
/
3
\
\
f
g
e
/
s
±
:
/
m
x
9
\
-
/
\
g
2
M
-
/
«
\
\
-_
5/
2
y
/
2
3
0/
s-
2
J=\
u
°
\
2
x
q=
°
k
®
»
°
®
:
}
J
S
\
%
$
/
g
E
»
J
ƒ
0
_
2
\
/
/
\
\
{
2
3
0
ma
/
\
/
7
\
/
/)
\
{
m)
ƒ
/
/
a
»
*
e
/
/
¢
_
a
°
k.0
m
)
\
\
§
7
©
)
co%
g
E
0
■
$
o
m
«

f6
E
E
N
v
x
x
x
to
O
m
n
Oo
N
00
o
N
O
O
A
Ul
M
O
00M
�
m
o
oq
�
�0
r`
,�
O
Iq �
O
O
N
m
o
in
oo
m
-1
00
T
o
c>
OO
OO
O
N ko
en
�N-I
cm
-I
j
� N
N
l^ff n
e
O
^ C,4
O
N W
O
N
o
Q1
N
N
O
00 M
m
O
m
v
-1
Ln 4
x
O
O
w
M
O�
`�
00
O
O�
O�
O
.--i
I�
-
M
00
p n
Lr)N
N
o
a
a
a
a
a
T o 0
0
o
O
z
z
z
z
z
m cy O
M m
O
I�
O
n
N
n
N
M
Ln
O lfl
V1 M
I,
M
V1
M
Q 00
rl
lD
O
00
Ln
N
O
0
++
b0
O
00
Q.
-6
7
t
On
i
bD
V1
Q/
Q/
�'
O
In
m
G
Q.
a�
v
o
v
p
3
�_
a�
v
3
o
O
o.
O
c
—
—
Q
t
x
X
N
i
3
N
G�
bD
N
(n
(n
a
s
V
O
7
Y—
C
C
O
C
=
Y
_N
O
O
00
O
m
6
N
y
N
C
O
U
7
\
Oto
O
W
y
C
Q
Y+
�
v
c
z
a
0_
o
v
w
o
w
£
w
3
acr
7
l\Ln
O
s
i
fa
m
'6
O
Y
C
C
m
cn
_
J„m
C
m
m
K
O
a
d
O
O
Y
C
w
m
o
o
�,
3
N
a
m
"
fC
v
fC
m
O
N
m
a
O
m
H
v
cn
°°cr
N
Lnen
s
`o
N
V
\
0
N
C
—
C
t
m
Nko
m
7mJ
s
v
a
o
�
�
�
m
y
c
v
_
Y
17
E
o
1.
0-
a
0

q
§
E
/
�
\
I
E
§
\
k
a
k
)
\
2
/
/
}
/
\
.
/
}
)
/R
\
c@
�
e
o
0
a
o
-
<
/
t
\ §
_
S
/
}
/G
/ /
\
\
\
r,
/
-
\
/
@ @
\
u
/
9 9 m 9
Ln
/
\
C .
@ m ®Q 4
\
tD
R=@@
q®
0
o
- Q@Ln
a
o°,I
cq
o-_
®3
w
u\
a G
G
»
/ 2
_ g
/ 9 e 9«
§
\ & %
m § ® §
&
/
/
yy2\/
2\£a/2/2
\\ %{
E%%««Ln
»
ƒ
f
f:
® /e3
f§
a== k=
_±/«
\/
\
2
.
x§=
f
o\ E
\ E
/ } 9
0
E
E
7
co
\
r
f
g
m
I=
c{°
« / ƒ a
7- >
4{
4
(
f
°
®_
/
£
2
«\
§
_
/
2
2
= 18 / a -
J = ,
•
O /
ƒ
«
q
°
$
M°
t
f
/
«
- ° G
_G
® t $ /
`
t ®
`
$
J
2/
2
4
f
G
8
:
() b
m
G 4
\
`
ƒ}
0
2
f
g 7
I
m
-
2/
U
]
§
} /
§
\
)
2
$
\
7
_/
\
;
/
\
IDa)3
g
0
§
*
co
aj
0
|
§
§
o
a
7

T
f0
E
E
7
m
00
x
\T
n oN
Lnr,j n
O
p
O1
l0
O
.�
Ln
N
m m
o
00
O
ci
I,
m
r,
ci
W N
O
fV
c-I \
U
O
c-�
m
00n
N O
O
p
00
Ln
O
ci
O
O
fV
^\
o
00
O
\ n
C
�p Q1
m
U
VJ
x
O
m00
N m
^ i
O
\ O
Ln
p
00
u1
V
00
m
O
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
NO
M n
o
t6
O
i
Ln
I,
rn
ri
z
z
z
z
z
m ti cy O
^
O
o m
p
ti o
\
O
U
Ln
y
-
7415
O
O
a
a
a
a
a
^
y
y
y
y
C
y
y
y
y
o
o
O
Y
w
L
L
a
K
K
K
L
y
w
L
L
OA
w
L
�J
y�
.�
L
U
L
y
y
w
y
O
O
Q
Q
w
N
w
Q
•u
'O
1
L
OA
L
w
,�
OA
'N
N
V
N
o
C7
o
\
Ln
tw
m
m
Q
n
aJ
v
J
a
v
J
m
O
3
v�
J
0
O
Q
Q\\
o
\
�
4J
cc�
G
(0
N
VJ
x
(n
N
?j
Gl
U
00
cn
VJ
V7
�
G1
y
Y
C
O
Q
7
Y
O
L
U
O
Y
w
N
o
O
O>
O
O
O
m
N
u=
>
(0
N
41
C
EC.7
O
N
3
QJ
U
—
7
o
\
o
00
'O
\
W
L
i
0
co
CO
c
m
U
N
co
CO
O
O
d
d
C
c
O
Y
C
m
�p
pp
v
i
m
O
Ln
O
(0
m
m
N
w
d
co
_
=o
co
m
N
N
cc
m
a
O
cr
H
n
m
'O
\
3
s
`°
u
m
C
G
v
V7
Ln
U
A
N
K
U
~
O
C
Y
O
C
O
m
y
C
C
O
QC:
G
f0
a
a
Q
F
w
m
.Q
Q
z
zz

v
v
Y
3
0
3
nn
E
Y
• � y W
N Q
Gl
C N O_ O_.V N
L
Ci
O _0 "6 N "6 7 N m
a+ Y r '6 N to Y O
u V
�
0 x t04
� "6 "6 \ —
v � N (0 N
x 3 E E 3 t 3 0
m
V
� Y 3
w m O O 00 O w o u
u
o
v
m ,v
N
V
0
0
3
Y
f0
f11
m
N
0
0
N
}
�l
0
a°
�
I
�
rn
o t
�
+
rn
0
0
0
0
0
N
}
O
O
N
O
O
0
(a})
uoi�enal3

ai
`
|
|
|
\
_
|
|
|
\
|
r
\
_
.
|
|
_
j
|
|
|
.
_
o
, \
.
|
\
-
|
|
~
\
\
|
|
|
~
k u�
q,

ai
/
y
)
\
c
\
m
ƒ
ƒ
\
}
\
J
\
_
(
k u�
q,

v
v
Q
0
a
0
0
v
Q
0
o
m
}
�
c
0
v
m
Y
v
m
Y
C
c0
�
m
t--I
N
ci
N
O
O
O
N
�
O
N
CZ)}
O
CZ)�
0
a
CZ)}
(a})
uoiIenal3
�• ''I:.': :`pP.
ig
}.. . .
S�.
- v
7 375
bD
O C
CT
ra O
'
L �! O
a@ E 15 c c .m c
L o y O v L w
E �n
G1 c N a s .� N
_6 � '6 � V C N C
u .� 'O Y r -6 N N Y p i 0C14 '6
N coN N `� 3
E x 3 E E 3- 3 a 80�
m 3 _ Y
7 � lD c-I M � Q) I, 0 cy N co
a 0 Q) c-I N O 00 OM M -4 T u
C N
o co,v
Z LL
� N
V
0

DJ
�f
m
v
C
i 3
0
0
3
a,
{
CD
q.
7t
_ bD
CT
a
w N 3@ @
c
L L
N
Y
@ p_ L N ` O_ �n
L
0 N O_ CL N cy '6
C p -a N "6 7 N @
y
CZ)
O V Y@@ Y oN 6
"6 "6 \
OL
ti
v VI N m N —
E x 3 E E 3 t 3 0
w
co
w m v n 00 v m v
L
ON
O
a
m ,v
Y
LL
In
O
U
3
Y
(0
m
O
�
N
O
N
4
0
N
0
o
a
_
N
O
CZ)
N
N

v
;.
E
r v
3
0
0
3
v
bD
O C
CT ra O v
p co
@ C
Y - -..,
N
E L w
L
O N Q Q.V N L i' cy
c p -p v '6 p N
V
O O c co to
ON M
v m v
ti
3 —
E x 3 E E 3 t 3 a 80�
� N
3 V co V r, cy o N v
00 ti O c4 O ti O 00 .4 '6
L
O
N
m ,v
Y
LL
N
V
O
U
v
Q
0
a
0
0
v
a`
0
o
m
�
�
0
w
m
m
c
v
m
I
I
I
—
3
Y
LO
m
�
N
ti
O
O
O
N
O
`y
N
O
O
N
c}
G
o
0
O
}
�
(a}) uoi�enal3

ai
/
w®`
:
& a . &•{
� E
,
!
. . : / ®
-LU_
}
.}
ƒ
�
�
~��\
�
• \ \.� �
J
`
CZ)
®
bD
%— Hof -
/ » 2 E
o \
\
()L2E
/_
CL
\
/\%/\///2\\
]
k
/$/ E\±$ a E g S\
Q
CD
f w
)
= o w = o e »
u
\
k u
q,
u

O
v �
5 _
V O
O
O' d
� O
w 3
O
V V
N
(v
CL
0
O
O
O
O
O
�
4
�
1
0
E
N
\
v �I
u T
R
a
.y
4
1T�
1
O
0
0
Y
O
v`
m
v
a
0
v
0
C
w
A
U
a
N
0
m
0
00
0
h
(%)
0
tp
anl;elnwn:)
0
of
0
V
0
M
W03Jad
0
N
0
c-I
0
.96.
O�
111
Or
d2
OI
�l
S
2'9F
gS 4
2 �
Ot •
r
8,
r
06,
.9
d Y
G1
Sd
A
92F
OC m
U
w •�
u
VM
8
16
O
a
9
S
d
82
2
�
r q
I
SO
I
S2.
O
Sir
� D
900
O
0 0
m
00
0 0
h
0
tp
0
of
0
V
0
M
0
N
0
c-I
0
IU03JOd
sseli
lenpinlpul
m
m
w
m
m
m
Ln
m
o
to
Ln
c-I
m
o
n
m
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
m
a £
U
E
u
w
�
w
N m
@ C
Op
rl
C
vt
vt
N
�
lD
vt
lD
Ol
lD
W
ti
�
N
ti
O
N
a
o
oo
ci
V
vt
vt
N
a
l0
to
to
m
to
w
rl
N
.--i
o
�
C
o
H
O
U
G
w
u
O.
M
M
N
M
�fl
M
M
�fl
rl
N
N
a
w
M
N
N
rl
N
M
�fl
lD
ti
N
rl
C
Ln
cc
E
x6
p-
LnLq
O
O
o0
O-
N
N
N
E
N
E
O
O
O
O
V
Ln
w
c-I
c-I
N
N
M
V
0
m
c-I
w
c-I
Ln
N
0
M
V/
c-I
p
N
O
^
H
N
1E6
C
O
l0
N
N
V)
O
O
o0
O
l0
O
O
O
l0
N
Ln
V
O
o0
O
Oo
l0
N
N
N
V
O
O
O
O
c-I
O
O
O
c-I
N
N
V
Ln
w
to
N
M
V
l0
m
cN-I
N
M
V/
O
O
w
c
E
o
0
o
E
E
o
o
E
Z
y
U
LL
iz
J
J
U
U
3
u0
U
w
1.1
Y
—
N>
w
w
LL
c
o
U>>>
w
w
w
w
c
LL
w
LL
N
o
U
N
o
U>>
w
w
N
E
V1
f6
E
In
m
J
m
J
@
E
N
m
E
N
w
cc
C
v
m
J
-6
w
CO
0
E
E >
w
"O
5 \
�
t0
l0
V
V1
t0
N
c-I
L
u
�
N
E
oC
w
C II
II
II
II
II
II
L !]
U
!]
!]
!]
!]
0

C
O
v �
V O
O
L
w co
CL
� O
w 3
O
U V
N
N
O
0
O
O
O
O
O
�
o
4
�
o 1
o
'+
E
H
\
u
m
u
R
a
N
4
1T�
1
O
0
0
Y
O
v`
m
m
v
a
a
o-
U
I
v
o
C
w
m
U
a
N
0 0
m 00
0
h
(%)
0
tp
anl;elnwn:)
0
of
0
V
0
M
W03Jad
0
N
0
c-I
0
96•
O�
8�
Or
d2
OI
�l
S
2'9F
gS 4
2 �
Ot •
r
8�
r
06'
�9
d Y
I_
G1
Sd
V
ai
V M
�F
m
N
92F
O m
U
9r o
� f6
■
U
V -0
A 6
O
a
9
S
d
82
2
r q
■
S2.
O
Sir
� D
900
O
0 0
m
00
0 0
h
0
tp
0
of
0
V
0
M
0
N
0
c-I
0
W03JOd
sseli
lenpinlpul
�,
u `-°
J
a
a
a
n
n
n
n
n
m
M
rl
oo
.--I
N
M
m
V
w
l0
m
I�
v
W
I,
Op
n
Op
n
Op
n
Op
n
Op
o
.--I
0
`m
a E
�••I
E
u'
E
N
u
m
N
N
m
y
N
a
C
0
O
U
w
u
Op
a
m
a
w
K
E
l0
O
N
c-I
N
�
0
0
00
O
t0
O
O
c-I
O
l0
N
N
M
Ln
V
a
l0
o
m
N
0
o0
to
V/
N
l0
N
N
a
oo
V
O
E
N
E
O
O
O
Oc-I
c-I
N
N
V
V/
00
c-I
N
M
Ln
c-I
N
A
N
IE6
C
O
to
N
N
V)
O
O
o0
O
l0
O
O
O
l0
N
Ln
V
O
w
O
l0
N
N
N
V
O
O
O
O
O
O
c-I
N
N
V
Ln
o0
c�-I
LD
N
M
V
ko
m
cN-I
oo
N
M
V/
O
O
v
c
E
o
0
o
E
E
o
o
E
Z
y
m
m
-
_J
U
LL
LL
J
J
U
U
J
u0
U
w
1.1
Y
-
N
v
i
LL
c0/
C
U
i
i
i
LL
LL��
U
U
i
i
V1
In
J
J
N
N
c
.
m
J
'O
y
CO
/
�p)�
0
In
heal,O�
m
E
N
p
ry^j
0
9
•3
cm -I
V
A
�
m
L
u
�
N
E
oC
w
C II
II
II
II
II
II
m
L !]
U
!]
!]
!]
!]
0

w
Z Iwo
v c
a o
L C 0
w tN C
O
u o 2
O
O
i+
G1
Y
NILN
N f6
rl C
H 3
V
N
N
0
O
O
O
O
O
�
4
�
1
0
{
a
.y
1T�
1
O
0
0
Y
O
v`
m
v
a
0
uti
w
m
U
a
N
0 0
01 00
0 0 0
h tp of
(%) anl;elnwn:)
0 0
V M
W03Jad
0
N
0
c-I
0
96.
Od
111
Or
d2
OI
�l
S
2'9F
r
gS 4
� �
Ot •
l
8�
l
06.
d9
s a
rF E
V y
w m
N
9�S in
�
K O
�O
U
rl w
a-i
~ >
"a
8
m
O
9 a
S
d
82
2
l q
■
S2.
O
Sal
� D
900
0 0
01
00
0 0
h
0
tp
of
0 0
V
0
M
0
N
0
c-I
0
O
W03JOd
sseli
lenpinlpul
m
a �
E
U
E
u
w
w
a
m
HC
�
o
0
�
O
U
u
O
a
N
N
M
M
M
lD
N
N
rl
N
a
w
ccN
N
rl
N
N
�fl
�fl
lD
(p
ti
N
C
Ln
E
mo��00000aIq000�cNmv�owo$v11
N roH
E
N
E
o
6
0
o
c-I
c-I
N
c-I
c-I
N
M
V/
c-I
N
^
N
1E6
-SE
O
l0
N
N
V)
O
O
o0
O
l0
O
O
O
0 l
N
Ln
V
o
oo
o
to
N
N
N
oo
-SE
O
O
O
O
c-I
O
p
o
c-I
N
N
V
Ln
oo
c�-I
ID
N
M
V
l0
m
cN-I
oo
N
M
Ln
O
O
w
c
E
o
0
o
E
E
o
o
E
Z
y
U
LL
iz
J
J
U
U
d
J
u0
ow
U
Y
—
w
w
LL
c
o
U
w
i
w
i
w
i
w
c
LL
w
LL
N
o
U
N
o
U
w
i
w
i
N
E
m
J
m
J
E
N
E>
N
C
J
CO
m
�
/
�p)�
0
O�
ry
m
E
E
w
-O
\
16 ++
c-I
O
c-I
l6
l0
-
O
O
0�0
3
w
L
u
�
w
E
oC
w
C II
II
II
II
II
II
L !]
U
!]
!]
!]
!]
0

ai
O
Y
y
3 N
L
V w aJ
K �
W1 (a
� a
Y
�
V
aJ
aJ
a
0
~
O
O
O
O
�
i
0
v
O \
u
ai
u
a
'y
l�
I
0
0
0
Y
O
v`
NO
v
a
0
>
w
a
c
U
a
N
0 0
0
(�)
0
ani;einwn:);ua»ad
0
0
0
0
0
0
.96.
Od
d'd
Or
d2
OI
�l
S
2'9F
9S2
08r
8�
r
IL
06,
t a
rF E
E
V N
(a N
■
y
9 n+
aJ ca
2F i%1
9
"O
rr v
e-1
'O
co
S
d
a2
z
r
so
s2.
0
Sir
" D
900
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
~
;ua»ad
ssel:)
lenpmipul
]•
c
d
� J
Ol
N
Ol
N
Ol
N
Ol
N
Ol
N
Ol
N
Ol
N
Ol
N
O
M
O
M
M
M��
N
I�
LD
Ill
�n
lD
O
I�
��
of
Ol
Ol
m
Ol
m
Ol
m
pl
m
pl
m
O
O
O
O
`m
a
�
uJ
E
J
N
m
�
m
U u
N
c-I
m
of
�rl
O
rn
io
O
�
a
io
m
v
a
Cm
of
vl
of
Lo
a
Lo
m
o
c
J
H
~
O
U
w
u_
0
a
Ln
i'
a
y
Ill
Ill
lD
N
V
N
a
E
p
D
�
N
0
0
of
O
D
O
O
O
D
N
n
C
lD
O
m
of
N
N
N
ol
a
OO
O
v
O
O
O
N
N
C
Ill
of
NMC
T
m
M
Ill
N
N
n
Cv
G
t0
O
O
�
N
lD
c
cN-I
In
O
O
O
N
of
N
O
T
lD
O
OJ
O
O
lD
N
M
In
C
T
lD
O
Ol
of
N
O
lD
N
iNy
N
O
T
O
Q
O
O
O
c-I
Ill
N
N
M
Ill
c
E
vOi
o
E
E
vOi
O
vOi
O
E>
m
T
Y
(p
:�
J
N
U
.�
li
LL
J
J
h
U
U
J
U
\
�'
N
t0
i
T
T
N
N
N
t0
i
T
m
m
w
w
m
m
tlOYO
-O
v—'
y
In
v
i
,E
IL
v
�
O
U
v
i
v
i
v
i
,E
IL
E
LL
°J
°'
O
U
O
U
v
i
v
i
E
In
E
N
J
J
E
In
E
N
m
a
>
j
Y
C
N U
Y
D7
lfl
O
C
N
N
C
n
3
v
L
u
�
v
E
aC
y
� II
II
II
II
II
II
�
t0
U
o
0

APPENDIX 5. Hydrology Summary Data

N
O
N
W
7
w
�C
V
o
¢
Z
N
O
O
N
N
O
a
0
O
O
O
(o
N
O
O
O C M N
00 N
N O
O
Z rl
N C m N
m m O 00 N
O
V
=o Q N O
pmp rl N
— bU c-I N
f0 +
•`y Z N
ai
w
Z N
-O >
C
L
lD
N
v N -O %
C
N C
a O
u
m
U L
L tY0
rl L
u
m C
3 T a 'O •_
y L d O
Y K
C
3 ♦+ L d O
r v7 C
f0 m O
t0
U
Y C w to C
O
O m c
F U o 2
O U o
0
Z
O
0
N
O
N
m
Q
Z
O
O
a
0
1'
l
C
�
O
w
� O
L
a
2°
O
I
N
C
>
Y
N
O.
O
O
M
N
�
C
Q
O.
L
U
-
m
n
n
N(ui)
uog.j!dnaldm
N o

Table 14. Wetland Gauge Summary
Catfish Pond Mitigation Site
DMS Project No. 100039
Monitoring Year 2 - 2021
Gauge
Max Consecutive Days During Growing Season (Percentage)
MY1 (2020)
MY2 (2021)
MY3 (2022)
MY4 (2023)
MY5 (2024)
MY6 (2025)
MY7 (2026)
14 Days
49 Days
1
(5.3%)
(19.1%)
100 Days
80 Days
2
(37.6%)
(31.3%)
109 Days
87 Days
3
(41.0%)
(34.0%)
59 Days
80 Days
4
(22.2%)
(31.3%)
*Data collected for informational purposes only, no success criteria is associated with the wetland areas.

a+ N
_O �n m
a +'
rg
r o
xo 0O N
m no r-IO N
Y O m
y Z d
3 U c
-0 a o 0
c s a 0
O +� O
(ui) uoilelidi:)aad
(ui) janal aaIe/VA

a+ N
_O �n m
a +'
rg
r o
xo 0O N
m no r-IO N
Y O m
y Z d
3 U c
-0 a o 0
c s a 0
O +� O
(ui) uoilelidi:)aad
(ui) janal aaIe/VA

a+ N
_O �n m
a +'
rg
r o
xo 0O N
m no r-IO N
Y O m
y Z d
3 U c
-0 a o 0
c s a 0
O +� O
(ui) uoilelidi:)aad
(ui) janal aaIe/VA

a+ N
_O �n m
a +'
rg
r o
xo 0O N
m no r-IO N
Y O m
y Z d
3 U c
-0 a o 0
c s a 0
O +� O
(ui) uoilelidi:)aad
(ui) janal aaIe/VA