20201217 Ver 2_Imapct Table and Maps_20211104

Strickland, Bev
From: Jennifer Burdette <[e-mail]>
Sent: Thursday, November 4, 2021 5:46 PM
To: Cohn, Colleen M; [e-mail]
Cc: Finch, Brandon
Subject: RE: [External] RE: Project Walter/Garner Rock Quarry Substation DWR# 20201217 V2 -
SAW-2018-01747
Attachments: image003.wmz; Walter Wetland Impact Table.pdf; 2021-11-02-DKE20130-Garner Rock
Quarry Impact Maps.pdf
CAUTION: External email. Do not click links or open attachments unless you verify. Send all suspicious email as an attachment to
Report Spam.
Please see the responses below in blue. The impact maps from the original response are also attached for convenience.
Thanks,
Jennifer
Jennifer Burdette
Natural Resource Consultants
10212 Creedmoor Road, Raleigh, NC 27615
[e-mail] — 919.422.3605
Natural Resource
Consultants
From: Cohn, Colleen M <[e-mail]>
Sent: Thursday, November 4, 2021 5:11 PM
To: Jennifer Burdette <[e-mail]>; [e-mail]
Cc: Finch, Brandon <[e-mail]>
Subject: RE: [External] RE: Project Walter/Garner Rock Quarry Substation DWR# 20201217 V2 -SAW-2018-01747
Please see additional comments below.
Colleen Cohn
Environmental Specialist II
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality
Division of Water Resources
Raleigh Regional Office
380o Barrett Drive
Raleigh, NC 27609
Office: 919-791-4258
E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the
North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.
From: Jennifer Burdette [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Tuesday, November 2, 2021 10:58 AM
To: Cohn, Colleen M <[e-mail]>; [e-mail]
i

Cc: Finch, Brandon <[e-mail]>
Subject: [External] RE: Project Walter/Garner Rock Quarry Substation DWR# 20201217 V2 -SAW-2018-01747
CAUTION: External email. Do not click links or open attachments unless you verify. Send all suspicious email as an attachment to
Report Spam.
Colleen,
Thank you for your review. Each item requested is provided below with a response.
1. Per 15A NCAC 02B .0714(11)(e), drainage of a pond subject to the buffer rules is Deemed Allowable provided
that a new riparian buffer is established by natural regeneration or planting within 50 feet of any stream which
naturally forms or is constructed within the drained pond area. Please provide more detail on how this project
plans to meet this requirement.
a. After the pond is drained, the bottom of the pond will be seeded with a native riparian seed mix at a the
suppliers suggested rate. Future T/T Substation and associated transmission lines may be at least 10
years before they are constructed. The 50-foot buffer around the pond will be maintained until a new
riparian buffer is established by natural regeneration along the stream that may form within the
drained pond. A new buffer determination will be requested at least six months after the pond has
been drained and prior to changing the buffer around the former pond.
2. From my understanding of the information provided in Section C, 4i, the application places the Buffer Impacts
labeled as Buffer Impact No. 1 under 15A NCAC 02B .0714(11)(gq) — Utilities- Non -sewer aerial lines- impacts
other than perpendicular crossings of streams. For Zone 1 impacts under this category, a condition states that
"poles or aerial infrastructure are not installed within 10 feet of a waterbody." The Impact Map for Buffer
Impact No. 1 appears to show one of the poles for the structure labeled STR 12A-3 close to the stream and is
unclear if the pole is further than 10 feet from the stream based on the provided graphic scale. Can you please
confirm that all poles and aerial infrastructure are not installed within 10 feet of a waterbody?
a. The pole of structure 12A-9 (formerly 12A-3; labels were inadvertently reversed on previous impact
maps) closest to the stream is approximately 10 feet from the stream. However, we did not account for
the caisson foundations for the poles. The structure has been shifted approximately 5 feet so that
caisson foundations are not within 10 feet of the stream. We also noted that previous, minor shifts in
the pole placement resulted in some caissons shown as not centered on the poles. The caissons have
been adjusted accordingly. A revised impact map set (dated 11-02-2021) is attached. Because the new
location of the structure falls also within the wetland, this does not change the amount of wetland
impact for W5.
3. Per the revised impact maps included in the October 12, 2021 response to additional information requested by
the USACE, 1 see an additional 0.280 acres of wetland impacts listed on the maps. Can you please send an
updated impact table, including type of wetland?
a. The additional 0.280 ac of wetland impact (W7) is permanent conversion of forested wetland to
herbaceous wetland resulting from hand clearing the easement. This wetland impact does not involve
fill, excavation or mechanized land clearing that would require a water quality certification. This impact
amount is provided to the USACE on which to base the amount of compensatory mitigation required for
the permanent conversion.
b. Based on the October 12, 2021 response to additional information requested by the USACE, this 0.28
acres is a permanent wetland impact but not a loss of wetlands and should still be included on the
impact table. Please send an updated impact table, including type of wetland.
2

A revised wetland impact table is attached. Please note that Impacts W4 & W5 were inadvertently
listed as not forested. Impact W7 has been added and the forested status of W4 & W5 have been
corrected.
4. I see the proposed easement and the proposed conversion from forested wetlands in the above referenced email.
Please provide more detail on the width of the permanent maintained access corridor associated the utility lines
within this easement.
a. The proposed transmission easement is 165 wide, and the entire easement will be permanently
maintained.
b. Condition 4 of the Activity Specific Conditions of GC4275 states that "permanent maintained access
corridors in wetlands and across stream channels shall be restricted to the minimum width practicable
and shall not exceed 30 feet wide." Please explain how this is the minimum width practicable for this
project through the wetland and stream in the proposed easement.
The proposed easement contains two sets of transmission lines that must be separated for the Garner
Rocky Quarry Substation to be tied into the system. This is the minimum width practicable for the
configuration required.
5. Your last response included an attachment entitled "image002.wmz". This would not open, and I did not see it
referenced in your response. Was this supplemental information? If so, could you please send again in a different
format?
The company logo in the email sometimes get converted to an attachment. The file is not part of the submittal.
Please let me know if you need any other information for your review.
Thanks,
Jennifer
Jennifer Burdette
Natural Resource Consultants
10212 Creedmoor Road, Raleigh, NC 27615
[e-mail] — 919.422.3605
From: Cohn, Colleen M <[e-mail]>
Sent: Friday, October 29, 2021 3:11 PM
To: Jennifer Burdette <[e-mail]>
Cc: [e-mail]
Subject: Project Walter/Garner Rock Quarry Substation DWR# 20201217 V2 -SAW-2018-01747
Jennifer,
I am reviewing the application for the above referenced project, and in order to complete the review, some additional
information is required:
1. Per 15A NCAC 02B .0714(11)(e), drainage of a pond subject to the buffer rules is Deemed Allowable provided
that a new riparian buffer is established by natural regeneration or planting within 50 feet of any stream which
3

naturally forms or is constructed within the drained pond area. Please provide more detail on how this project
plans to meet this requirement.
2. From my understanding of the information provided in Section C, 4i, the application places the Buffer Impacts
labeled as Buffer Impact No. 1 under 15A NCAC 02B .0714(11)(gq) — Utilities- Non -sewer aerial lines- impacts
other than perpendicular crossings of streams. For Zone 1 impacts under this category, a condition states that
"poles or aerial infrastructure are not installed within 10 feet of a waterbody." The Impact Map for Buffer
Impact No. 1 appears to show one of the poles for the structure labeled STR 12A-3 close to the stream and is
unclear if the pole is further than 10 feet from the stream based on the provided graphic scale. Can you please
confirm that all poles and aerial infrastructure are not installed within 10 feet of a waterbody?
3. Per the revised impact maps included in the October 12, 2021 response to additional information requested by
the USACE, I see an additional 0.280 acres of wetland impacts listed on the maps. Can you please send an
updated impact table, including type of wetland?
4. I see the proposed easement and the proposed conversion from forested wetlands in the above referenced
email. Please provide more detail on the width of the permanent maintained access corridor associated the
utility lines within this easement.
Thanks,
Colleen Cohn
Environmental Specialist II
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality
Division of Water Resources
Raleigh Regional Office
380o Barrett Drive
Raleigh, NC 27609
Office: 919-791-4258
E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the
North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.
4

2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
"W." will be used in the table below to represent the word "wetland".
2a. Site #
2a1. Reason
2b. Impact type
2c. Tytpe of W.
2d. W. name
2e. Forested
2f. Type of
Jurisdiction
2g. Impact area
W1
3-pole electric utility
structure
P
Bottomland Hardwood Forest
W6
No
Both
0.005
W2
1-pole electric utility
structure
P
Bottomland Hardwood Forest
W6
No
Both
0.002
W3
1-pole electric utility
structure
P
Bottomland Hardwood Forest
W6
No
Both
0.002
W4
3-pole electric utility
structure
P
Bottomland Hardwood Forest
W6
Yes
Both
0.004
W5
3-pole electric utility
structure
P
Bottomland Hardwood Forest
W6
Yes
Both
0.005
W6
1-pole electric utility
structure
P
Bottomland Hardwood Forest
W7
No
Both
0.002
W7
power line easement
P
Bottomland Hardwood Forest
W6
Yes
Both
0.28
2g. Total Temporary Wetland Impact
2g. Total Permanent Wetland Impact
2g. Total Wetland Impact

gg
\ss\\
\Ss
DUKE ENERGY PROGRESS, LLC
PIN: 1721866178
D.B. 16877, PG. 2611
B.M. 2018, PG. 929
4401 AUBURN CHURCH ROAD
EXISTING
PROPERTY LINE
(TYP.)
ou o \
GRAPHIC SCALE
0 150 300
1 inch = 300 ft.
600
/ °4n
//
PROJECT
WALTER
PROPOSED
WETLAND IMPACT
AREA NO. 2
/
FUTURE
TRANSMISSION
ROUTES
TRANSMISSION
ROUTES
EXISTING 200' CP&L
TRANSM ISSION
EASEMENT
PROPOSED 165' CP&L
TRANSMISSION
EASEMENT
II\�o
GARNER ROCK
QUARRY
SUBSTATION
BUFFER IMPACT
AREA NO. 1
WETLAND IMPACT
AREA NO. 1
BIG BRANCH CREEK
L /
FUTURE
TRANSMISSION
ROUTES
COMPOSITE
MATTING FOR
TRANSMISSION
LINE ACCESS
EXISTING
FLOODPLAIN
et'aN DUKE
ENERGY.
PROGRESS
•
NC GRID (NAD83)
LEGEND
ou
— EASEMENT LINE
ou OVERHEAD UTILITY LINE
— BUFF— 50 FT. STATE REGULATED BUFFER
— DEP— 20 FT. DEP PROTECTIVE BUFFER
•
•
•
•
•
JURISDICTIONAL WETLAND
GARNER ROCK QUARRY
230kV SUBSTATION
OVERALL IMPACT MAP
LOCATION RALEIGH, NC
SCALE 1" = 300' SCALE RATIO 1: 1
DRAWN SMP CHK. PLC APP. _
DATE 11/02/2021 DWG. NO. TBD SHEET 1 OF 4

AM, Shane Pi
N
O
IM2.dwg, 11/2/2021 1
Cn
0
m
LaJ
0
3.
LaJ
w
1SW 199-3
NC GRID (NAD83)
STR 199-2
PERMANENT WETLAND
IMPACT W3 - 0.002 AC.
(1-POLE STRUCTURE)
PROPOSED 165' CP&L
TRANSMISSION
EASEMENT
ou
PERMANENT WETLAND
MPACT W4 - 0.004 AC.
(3-POLE STRUCTURE)
STR 12A-9
v
•
•
•
•
•
STR 199-1
•
N
N
N
10 ft. DIA. CONCRETE
CAISSON (TYP.)
PERMANENT WETLAND
IMPACT W 1- 0.005 AC.
(3-POLE STRUCTURE)
PERMANENT WETLAND
IMPACT W2 - 0.001 AC.
(1-POLE STRUCTURE)
PERMANENT WETLAND
IMPACT W5 - 0.005 AC.
(3-POLE STRUCTURE)
PERMANENT
CONVERSION WETLAND
IMPACT W7 - 0.28 AC.
LEGEND
EASEMENT LINE
OVERHEAD UTILITY LINE
— BUFF— 50 FT. STATE REGULATED BUFFER
— DEP— 20 FT. DEP PROTECTIVE BUFFER
JURISDICTIONAL WETLAND
COMPOSITE
MATTING FOR
TRANSMISSION Q
LINE ACCESS
EX. STR 12A-1
N
WETLAND IMPACT
NO.
AC.
1
0.005
2
0.002
3
0.002
4
0.004
5
0.005
6
0.002
7
0.280
TOTAL
0.300
0
no
•
00 o EXISTING 200' CP&L �o \0oo o
00 TRANSMISSION
EASEMENT
no
DE -
EXISTING
FLOODPLAIN
GRAPHIC SCALE
25 50 100
1 inch = 50 ft.
�� EDINI� Ys
PROGRESS
GARNER ROCK QUARRY
230kV SUBSTATION
WETLAND IMPACT AREA NO. 1 — CONCRETE FOUNDATIONS
LOCATION RALEIGH, NC
SCALE 1" = 50'
DRAWN SMP
DATE 11/02/2021
SCALE RATIO 1:1
CHK. PLC APP. _
DWG. NO. TBD SHEET 2 OF 4

V/
•
COMPOSITE
MATTING FOR
• TRANSMISSION
LINE ACCESS
Q
" ob
0
O
C0
0
F.
c
U
V
CL
EL
BUFF
BUF
BUFF
GRAPHIC SCALE
0 25 50 100
1 inch = 50 ft.
NC GRID (NAD83)
ou
PERMANENT WETLAND
IMPACT W6 - 0.002 AC.
(1-POLE STRUCTURE)
EXISTING
FLOODPLAIN
\a�
EX. STR 201
�A - PF-
LEGEND
EASEMENT LINE
ou OVERHEAD UTILITY LINE
— BUFF— 50 FT. STATE REGULATED BUFFER
— DEP— 20 FT. DEP PROTECTIVE BUFFER
JURISDICTIONAL WETLAND
10 ft. DIA. CONCRETE
CAISSON (TYP.)
/70
EXISTING 200' CP&L
TRANSM ISSION
EASEMENT
WETLAND IMPACT
NO.
AC.
1
0.005
2
0.002
3
0.002
4
0.004
5
0.005
6
0.002
7
0.280
TOTAL
0.300
BIG BRANCH CREEK
STR 453
00
' RIPARIAN UFFE
�� DUKE Y.
PROGRESS
GARNER ROCK QUARRY
230kV SUBSTATION
WETLAND IMPACT AREA NO. 2 — CONCRETE FOUNDATION
LOCATION RALEIGH, NC
SCALE 1" = 50'
DRAWN SMP
DATE 11/02/2021
SCALE RATIO 1: 1
CHK. PLC APP. _
DWG. NO. TBD SHEET 3 OF 4

r)
0
i
4
i
w
i
/DAM
BREACH
/ /////
/ PUMP
EXISTING
POND
RUFF
GRAPHIC SCALE
0 25 50
1 inch = 50 ft.
NC GRID (NAD83)
ou
PROPOSED 165' CP&L
TRANSMISSION -
EASEMENT
TEMPORARY
TIMBER BRIDGE
50' RIPARIAN BUFFER
ZONE 2
ZONE 1 .ACNe
DISCHARGE
PIPING
SEDIMENT
FILTER
BAG
COMPOSITE MATTING FOR
POND DRAINING ACCESS
LEGEND
EASEMENT LINE
OVERHEAD UTILITY LINE
— BUFF— 50 FT. STATE REGULATED BUFFER
— DEP— 20 FT. DEP PROTECTIVE BUFFER
JURISDICTIONAL WETLAND
10 ft. DIA. CONCRETE
i• CAISSON (TYP.)
STR 12A-2
BUFFER IMPACT
NO.
ZONE 1 SF.
ZONE 2 SF.
1
10,455
7,841
TOTAL
10,455
7,841
�y EDINI� Ys
PROGRESS
GARNER ROCK QUARRY
230kV SUBSTATION
BUFFER IMPACT AREA NO. 1
LOCATION RALEIGH, NC
SCALE 1" = 50' SCALE RATIO 1:
DRAWN SMP CHK. PLC APP. _
DATE 11 /02/2021 DWG. NO. TBD SHEET 4 OF 4