The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About20131283 Ver 1_Application_20131212 STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION PAT MCCRORY ANTHONY J. TATA GOVERNOR SECRETARY 716 West Main Street, Albemarle, NC 28001 Office (704) 983-4400  Fax (704) 982-3146 December 12, 2013 U. S. Army Corps of Engineers Asheville Regulatory Field Office Attention: Ms. Amanda Fuemmeler 151 Patton Avenue, Room 208 Asheville, NC 28801-5006 Subject: Bridge No. 890262 SR 1524 (Stevens Mill Road) - Union County WBS Element Number 17BP.10.R.50 Dear Ms. Fuemmeler: The North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) proposes to replace an Bridge No. 262 on SR 1524 (Stevens Mill Road) in Union County. This project cannot be constructed without impacts to waters of the United States. The NCDOT proposes to replace the existing (41’ L x 24’ W) bridge and replace it with a new (80’ L x 33’ W) pre-stressed cored slab bridge. This crossing carries an unnamed tributary to North Fork Crooked Creek, a Class C water, located in the Yadkin River Basin, Hydrologic Unit 03040105. The total length of permanent stream impacts for this project is 65 linear feet. There will also be 0.005 acre of wetland impacts associated with the project. The NCDOT would like to request authorization to construct the project under a Section 404 Nationwide Permit No. 14 and the Section 401 Water Quality Certification GC3886 based upon the enclosed information. If you have any questions or need any additional information regarding this request, please contact Mr. Larry Thompson, Division Environmental Supervisor, at (704) 983- 4437. Thank you for your assistance with this request. Sincerely, Larry B. Thompson, Jr. Division Environmental Supervisor LLM/LBT 716 West Main Street, Albemarle, NC 28001 Office (704) 983-4400  Fax (704) 982-3146 cc: Mr. Alan Johnson, NCDWR Mr. Garland Haywood, BME Mr. Phil Suggs, FOE Mr. Larry Thompson, DES File 1 ATTACHMENT PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION FORM BACKGROUND INFORMATION A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (JD): December 9, 2013 B. NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERSON REQUESTING PRELIMINARY JD: Larry Thompson NC Department of Transportation 716 W. Main Street Albemarle, NC 28001 C. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER: D. PROJECT LOCATION(S) AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION: Bridge No. 262 - Stevens Mill Road (East of 5325 Stevens Mill Road) Unnamed Tributary to N. Fork Crooked Creek (USE THE ATTACHED TABLE TO DOCUMENT MULTIPLE WATERBODIES AT DIFFERENT SITES) State:NC County/parish/borough: Union City: Stallings Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format): Lat. 35.130671° N, Long. -80.631217° W Universal Transverse Mercator: 17 Name of nearest waterbody: N. Fork Crooked Creek Identify (estimate) amount of waters in the review area: Non-wetland waters: 60 linear feet: 24 width (ft) and/or acres. Cowardin Class: Riverine Stream Flow: Perennial Wetlands: 0.005 acres. Cowardin Class: Riverine Name of any water bodies on the site that have been identified as Section 10 waters: Tidal: Non-Tidal: 2 E. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY): Office (Desk) Determination. Date: Field Determination. Date(s): 1. The Corps of Engineers believes that there may be jurisdictional waters of the United States on the subject site, and the permit applicant or other affected party who requested this preliminary JD is hereby advised of his or her option to request and obtain an approved jurisdictional determination (JD) for that site. Nevertheless, the permit applicant or other person who requested this preliminary JD has declined to exercise the option to obtain an approved JD in this instance and at this time. 2. In any circumstance where a permit applicant obtains an individual permit, or a Nationwide General Permit (NWP) or other general permit verification requiring “pre-construction notification” (PCN), or requests verification for a non-reporting NWP or other general permit, and the permit applicant has not requested an approved JD for the activity, the permit applicant is hereby made aware of the following: (1) the permit applicant has elected to seek a permit authorization based on a preliminary JD, which does not make an official determination of jurisdictional waters; (2) that the applicant has the option to request an approved JD before accepting the terms and conditions of the permit authorization, and that basing a permit authorization on an approved JD could possibly result in less compensatory mitigation being required or different special conditions; (3) that the applicant has the right to request an individual permit rather than accepting the terms and conditions of the NWP or other general permit authorization; (4) that the applicant can accept a permit authorization and thereby agree to comply with all the terms and conditions of that permit, including whatever mitigation requirements the Corps has determined to be necessary; (5) that undertaking any activity in reliance upon the subject permit authorization without requesting an approved JD constitutes the applicant’s acceptance of the use of the preliminary JD, but that either form of JD will be processed as soon as is practicable; (6) accepting a permit authorization (e.g., signing a proffered individual permit) or undertaking any activity in reliance on any form of Corps permit authorization based on a preliminary JD constitutes agreement that all wetlands and other water bodies on the site affected in any way by that activity are jurisdictional waters of the United States, and precludes any challenge to such jurisdiction in any administrative or judicial compliance or enforcement action, or in any administrative appeal or in any Federal court; and (7) whether the applicant elects to use either an approved JD or a preliminary JD, that JD will be processed as soon as is practicable. Further, an approved JD, a proffered individual permit (and all terms and conditions contained therein), or individual permit denial can be administratively appealed pursuant to 33 C.F.R. Part 331, and that in any administrative appeal, jurisdictional issues can be raised (see 33 C.F.R. 331.5(a)(2)). If, during that administrative appeal, it becomes necessary to make an official determination whether CWA jurisdiction exists over a site, or 3 to provide an official delineation of jurisdictional waters on the site, the Corps will provide an approved JD to accomplish that result, as soon as is practicable. This preliminary JD finds that there “may be” waters of the United States on the subject project site, and identifies all aquatic features on the site that could be affected by the proposed activity, based on the following information: SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for preliminary JD (check all that apply - checked items should be included in case file and, where checked and requested, appropriately reference sources below): Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the applicant/consultant: Larry Thompson - NCDOT. Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the applicant/consultant. Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report. Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report. Data sheets prepared by the Corps: . Corps navigable waters’ study: . U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas: . USGS NHD data. USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps. U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name: Matthews – 1 inch equals 1200 feet. USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation: National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name: . State/Local wetland inventory map(s): . FEMA/FIRM maps: . 100-year Floodplain Elevation is: (National Geodectic Vertical Datum of 1929) Photographs: Aerial (Name & Date):Union - 2010. or Other (Name & Date): . Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter: . Other information (please specify): Liz Hair involved with original scoping of project. IMPORTANT NOTE: The information recorded on this form has not necessarily been verified by the Corps and should not be relied upon for later jurisdictional determinations. _________________________ __________________________ Signature and date of Signature and date of Regulatory Project Manager person requesting preliminary JD December 9, 2013 4 SAMPLE Site number Latitude Longitude Cowardin Class Estimated amount of aquatic resource in review area Class of aquatic resource 1 35.130671°N -80.631217°W Riverine 60 linear feet Non-Section 10 Non- Wetland 2 35.130671°N -80.631217°W Riverine 0.005 acre Non-Section 10 Wetland Page 1 of 12 PCN Form – Version 1.0 November 2008 Version Pre-Construction Notification (PCN) Form A. Applicant Information 1. Processing 1a. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps: Section 404 Permit Section 10 Permit 1b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 14 or General Permit (GP) number: 1c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps? Yes No 1d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply): 401 Water Quality Certification – Regular Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit 401 Water Quality Certification – Express Riparian Buffer Authorization 1e. Is this notification solely for the record because written approval is not required? For the record only for DWQ 401 Certification: Yes No For the record only for Corps Permit: Yes No 1f. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in-lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in-lieu fee program. Yes No 1g. Is the project located in any of NC’s twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1h below. Yes No 1h. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)? Yes No 2. Project Information 2a. Name of project: Bridge 262 - SR 1524 (Stevens Mill Road) 2b. County: Union 2c. Nearest municipality / town: Stallings 2d. Subdivision name: 2e. NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state project no: 17BP.10.R.50 3. Owner Information 3a. Name on Recorded Deed: 3b. Deed Book and Page No. 3c. Responsible Party (for LLC if applicable): 3d. Street address: 3e. City, state, zip: 3f. Telephone no.: 3g. Fax no.: 3h. Email address: Office Use Only: Corps action ID no. _____________ DWQ project no. _______________ Form Version 1.0 November 2008 Section A. Applicant Information, continued Page 2 of 12 PCN Form – November 2008 Version 4. Applicant Information (if different from owner) 4a. Applicant is: Agent Other, specify: 4b. Name: Larry Thompson 4c. Business name (if applicable): NC Department of Transportation 4d. Street address: 716 W. Main Street 4e. City, state, zip: Albemarle, NC 28001 4f. Telephone no.: 704-982-0101 4g. Fax no.: 704-982-3146 4h. Email address: lthompson@ncdot.gov 5. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable) 5a. Name: 5b. Business name (if applicable): 5c. Street address: 5d. City, state, zip: 5e. Telephone no.: 5f. Fax no.: 5g. Email address: Page 3 of 12 PCN Form – Version 1.0 November 2008 Version B. Project Information and Prior Project History 1. Property Identification 1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID): 1b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees): 35.130671‘N - 80.631217‘W 1c. Property size: .523 (60' maintained ROW area) acres 2. Surface Waters 2a. Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc.) to proposed project: North Fork Crooked Creek 2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water: C 2c. River basin: Yadkin (03040105) 3. Project Description 3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this application: SR 1524 (Stevens Mill Road) is a paved secondary road in Union County . The general land use in the area of the project is a mix of agricultural and residential. 3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property: .005 3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property: There is 85 linear feet of stream associated with this project. 65 of which will be impacted due to a stream reloctation 3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project: To improve the safety of the existing roadway, NCDOT proposes to remove a substandard ( 41' L x 24' W) bridge and replace it with a new (80 'L x 33' W) prestressed cored slab bridge that will span the creek. 3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used: Erosion control devices will be installed along with an impervious dike and bypass pipe to allow for dewatering. (This will allow all work to be completed in the dry.) The contractor will remove any vegitation that will need to be cleared for the construction of the new bridge. The existing bridge will be removed and dismantled according to NCDOT's Best Management Practices for bridge removal. The new bridge will be constructed with the addition of new drainage pipes, asphalt, curve and gutter. Shoulders will be constructed along both sides of the road with appropriate erosion control measures staying in place until vegitation is established.. The equipment that will be required to construct this project will include: dewatering pump, trackhoe, crane, dumptrucks, vibratory roller, motor grader and paving equipment. 4. Jurisdictional Determinations 4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property / project (including all prior phases) in the past? Yes No Unknown 4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type of determination was made? Preliminary Final 4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas? Name (if known): Liz Hair/Polly Lespinessie Agency/Consultant Company: USACOE Other: NCDWR 4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation. Fall of 2011 5. Project History 5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for this project (including all prior phases) in the past? Yes No Unknown 5b. If yes, explain in detail according to “help file” instructions. B. Project Information and Prior Project History Page 4 of 12 PCN Form – November 2008 Version 6. Future Project Plans 6a. Is this a phased project? Yes No 6b. If yes, explain. Page 5 of 12 PCN Form – Version 1.0 November 2008 Version C. Proposed Impacts Inventory 1. Impacts Summary 1a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply): Wetlands Streams - tributaries Buffers Open Waters Pond Construction 2. Wetland Impacts If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted. 2a. Wetland impact number – Permanent (P) or Temporary (T) 2b. Type of impact 2c. Type of wetland (if known) 2d. Forested 2e. Type of jurisdiction (Corps - 404, DWQ – non-404, other) 2f. Area of impact (acres) W1 P T Fill Riparian Yes No Corps DWQ .005 W2 P T Yes No Corps DWQ W3 P T Yes No Corps DWQ W4 P T Yes No Corps DWQ W5 P T Yes No Corps DWQ W6 P T Yes No Corps DWQ 2g. Total wetland impacts 2h. Comments: 3. Stream Impacts If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this question for all stream sites impacted. 3a. Stream impact number - Permanent (P) or Temporary (T) 3b. Type of impact 3c. Stream name 3d. Perennial (PER) or intermittent (INT)? 3e. Average stream width (feet) 3f. Impact length (linear feet) S1 P T Relocate existing Stream Channel UT to North Fork Crooked Creek PER INT 2 Feet 65 Feet S2 P T Dewater UT to North Fork Crooked Creek PER INT 24 Feet 33 Feet S3 P T PER INT S4 P T PER INT S5 P T PER INT S6 P T PER INT 3g. Total stream and tributary impacts 65 Feet Permanent 3h. Comments: The 65' of permanent impact is due to the relocation of an existing stream that runs adjacent to Stevens Mill Road on the north side of the project. The temporary impacts are to allow for dewatering the work area. C. Proposed Impacts Inventory, continued Page 6 of 12 PCN Form – November 2008 Version 4. Open Water Impacts If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of the U.S. then individually list all open water impacts below. 4a. Open water impact number – Permanent (P) or Temporary (T) 4b. Name of waterbody (if applicable) 4c. Type of impact 4d. Waterbody type 4e. Area of impact (acres) O1 P T O2 P T O3 P T O4 P T 4f. Total open water impacts 4g. Comments: C. Proposed Impacts Inventory, continued Page 7 of 12 PCN Form – November 2008 Version 5. Pond or Lake Construction If pond or lake construction proposed, then complete the chart below. 5a. Pond ID number 5b. Proposed use or purpose of pond 5c. Wetland Impacts (acres) 5d. Stream Impacts (feet) 5e. Upland (acres) Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded P1 P2 5f. Total 5g. Comments: 5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required? Yes No If yes, permit ID no: 5i. Expected pond surface area (acres): 5j. Size of pond watershed (acres): 5k. Method of construction: 6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ) If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form. 6a. Project is in which protected basin? Neuse Tar-Pamlico Other: Catawba Randleman 6b. Buffer impact number – Permanent (P) or Temporary (T) 6c. Reason for impact 6d. Stream name 6e. Buffer mitigation required? 6f. Zone 1 impact (square feet) 6g. Zone 2 impact (square feet) B1 P T Yes No B2 P T Yes No B3 P T Yes No 6h. Total buffer impacts 6i. Comments: Page 8 of 12 PCN Form – Version 1.0 November 2008 Version D. Impact Justification and Mitigation 1. Avoidance and Minimization 1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project. NCDOT has limited the amount of permanent impacts by designing a structure that will span the creek. The work area will be dewatered as needed throughout the construction process in an effort to minimize sediment loss. NPDES inspections will be performed weekly and records will be kept throughout the life of the project. 1b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques. Impacts will be minimized by installing appropriate erosion control measures and keeping the site dewatered throughout the construction process. 2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State 2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State? Yes No 2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply): DWQ Corps 2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this project? Mitigation bank Payment to in-lieu fee program Permittee Responsible Mitigation 3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank 3a. Name of Mitigation Bank: 3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter) Type Quantity 3c. Comments: 4. Complete if Making a Payment to In-lieu Fee Program 4a. Approval letter from in-lieu fee program is attached. Yes 4b. Stream mitigation requested: 65 linear feet 4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature: warm warm, cool, cold 4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only): square feet 4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested: 0.005 acres 4f. Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres 4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested: acres 4h.. Comments: 5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan 5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan. D. Impact Justification and Mitigation, continued Page 9 of 12 PCN Form – November 2008 Version 6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) – required by DWQ 6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires buffer mitigation? Yes No 6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the amount of mitigation required. Zone Reason for impact Total impact (square feet) Multiplier Required mitigation (square feet) Zone 1 3 (2 for Catawba) Zone 2 1.5 Total buffer mitigation required: 6c. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank, permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in-lieu fee fund). 6d. Comments: Page 10 of 12 PCN Form – Version 1.0 November 2008 Version E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ) 1. Diffuse Flow Plan 1a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules? Yes No 1b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? Yes No 2. Determination if the Project Requires a Stormwater Management Plan 2a. Does the project require a Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit? Yes No 2b. Is the project subject to General Certification 3704 or 3705? Yes No 3. Determination of Stormwater Review Jurisdiction 3a. Is this project subject to any of the following state-implemented stormwater management programs (check all that apply)? If so, attach one copy of the approval letter from the DWQ and one copy of the approved stormwater management plan. Coastal counties HQW ORW Session Law 2006-246 Other: NCDOT NCS000250 3b. In which local government’s jurisdiction is this project? Union County 3c. Is this local government certified to implement a state stormwater program? If so, attach one copy of the approval letter from the local government and one copy of the approved stormwater management plan (or one copy of the approved Stormwater management plan stamped as approved). Yes No 4. Information Required for DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review 4a. What is the overall percent imperviousness according to the most current site plan? .19 ac 4b. Does this project contain any areas that meet the criteria for “high density” per General Certifications 3704 and 3705? Yes No 4c. If the site is over 24% impervious and/or contains high density areas, then provide a brief narrative description of the stormwater management plan. The proposed road windening will increase the existing impervious area from .19 acres to .28 acres, an increase of 0.09 acres. 4d. Has a completed BMP Supplement Form with all required items been submitted for each stormwater BMP? Yes No Page 11 of 12 PCN Form – Version 1.0 November 2008 Version F. Supplementary Information 1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement) 1a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of public (federal/state) land? Yes No 1b. If you answered “yes” to the above, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State (North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)? Yes No 1c. If you answered “yes” to the above, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter.) Comments: Yes No 2. Violations (DWQ Requirement) 2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards, or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)? Yes No 2b. Is this an after-the-fact permit application? Yes No 2c. If you answered “yes” to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s): 3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement) 3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality? Yes No 3b. If you answered “yes” to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the most recent DWQ policy. If you answered “no,” provide a short narrative description. 4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement) 4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility. F. Supplementary Information, continued Page 12 of 12 PCN Form – November 2008 Version 5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement) 5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or habitat? Yes No 5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act impacts? Yes No 5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted. Raleigh Asheville 5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical Habitat? Natural Heritage GIS data layer and a field review conducted by NCDOT biologists. USFWS was given project information during the initial scoping process for the 17BP.10.R.50 projects. 6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement) 6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat? Yes No 6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat? South Atlantic Fishery Management Council 7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement) 7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in North Carolina history and archaeology)? Yes No 7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources? National Register of Historic Places and NC State Historic Preservation Office 8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement) 8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain? Yes No 8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements: 8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? NCDOT GIS data layer Larry Thompson Applicant/Agent's Printed Name _______________________________ Applicant/Agent's Signature (Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.) 12/04/2013 Date T V = = =MPH ADT INCOMPLETE PLANS DO NOT USE FOR R/W ACQUISITION DO NOT USE FOR CONSTRUCTION PRELIMINARY PLANS 0 0 0 PROFILE (HORIZONTAL) 17BP.10.R.50 PE, UTIL., R/W CONST. PROJECT LENGTH STATE STATE PROJECT REFERENCE NO. STATE PROJ. NO.F. A. PROJ. NO.DESCRIPTION NO. TOTAL SHEETS N.C. SHEET 1 DESIGN DATA SIGNATURE: SIGNATURE: P.E. P.E. PLANS PROFILE (VERTICAL) HYDRAULICS ENGINEER ENGINEER ROADWAY DESIGN LOCATION: TYPE OF WORK: 0 9 / 0 8 / 9 9 DB10-890262DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA 0 00 See Sheet 1-A For Index of Sheets 12 : 3 5 : 3 6 P M R : \ H y d r a u li c s \ P E R M IT S _ E n v i r o n m e n t a l\ D r a w i n g s \ D B 10 _ 8 9 0 2 6 2 _ R d y _ t s h . d g n r e m y r C O N T R A C T : T I P P R O J E C T : D B 10 - 8 9 0 2 6 2 A R T MEN N A S O H D E P T O F TRA SPORT T IO N T A TEOFN RT CAR O LI N A UNION COUNTY BRIDGE NO. 890262 OVER BRANCH CREEK ON SR 1524 (STEVENS MILL RD.) GRADING, DRAINAGE, PAVING & STRUCTURE 50 25 50 100 50 25 50 100 10 5 10 20 2012 4000 45 FUNC CLASS = LOCAL SUBREGIONAL TIER 6 % TOTAL LENGTH TIP PROJECT DB10-890262 LENGTH STRUCTURE TIP PROJECT DB10-890262 LENGTH ROADWAY TIP PROJECR DB10-890262 RIGHT OF WAY DATE: LETTING DATE: PROJECT ENGINEER PROJECT DESIGN ENGINEER ENGINEERING ETHERILLW Raleigh, N.C. 27606 Bus: 919 851 8077 Fax: 919 851 8107 SUITE 164 559 JONES FRANKLIN ROAD Liscense No. F-0377 NCDOT CONTACT: DESIGN-BUILD ENGINEER EDWARD G. WETHERILL, PE 2012 STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS in the Office of: Prepared for Dane Construction Inc. GREG S. PURVIS, PE MAY 15, 2012 MAY 15, 2012 VIRGINIA MABRY VICINITY MAP OFF-SITE DETOUR MECKLENBURG COUNTY UNION COUNTY 1524 1524 1365 2396 23953081 3008 3176 1552 1365 Light Briga d e Dr 3175 3174 5233 5229 5230 1501 3253 5231 1501 1524 2347 PROPOSED CONSTRUCTIO N MONROE BYPASS PROJECT SITE NSRS 2007NAD 83/ CLEARING ON THIS PROJECT SHALL BE PERFORMED TO THE LIMITS ESTABLISHED BY METHOD II. A PORTION OF THIS PROJECT IS WITHIN THE MUNICIPAL BOUNDARIES OF THE TOWNS OF HEMBY BRIDGE AND STALLINGS. TO W N O F H EM BY BRID G E TO W N O F STA LLIN G S TOWN OF HEMBY BRIDGE TOWN OF STALLINGS 4 BEGIN BRIDGE END BRIDGE BEGIN TIP PROJECT DB10-890262 END TIP PROJECT DB10-890262 -L-SR 1524 STEVENS MILL RD. TO SR 1365 TO SR 1501 -L- STA. 11+80.00 -L- STA. 15+60.00 -L- STA. 13+30.00 -L- STA. 14+10.00 = 0.072 MILES = 0.015 MILES = 0.057 MILES PROPOSED CONSTRUCTIO N MONROE BYPASS PROPOSED CONSTRUCTIO N MONROE BYPASS PROPOSED CONSTRUCTIO N MONROE BYPASS 485 485 WETLAND AND SURFACE WATER IMPACTS PERMIT C RO O KED C REEK TRIB N O RTH FO RK 15" RCP-IV 15" CSP CB TB 2GI GEOTEXTILE EST 7 SY EST 2 TONS CL B RIP RAP 15" ( Not to Scale) SPECIAL LATERAL ’V’ DITCH 2: 1 D FROM STA. 14+10 -L- TO STA. 14+50 -L- LT Min. D=1.0 Ft. DETAIL 4 Ground Natural Flatter2:1 or Slope Fill B 2:12: 1 D ( Not to Scale) STANDARD BASE DITCH FROM STA. 13+30 -L- TO STA. 13+60 -L- LT DETAIL 2 B=2.0 Ft. Min. D=1.5 Ft. Ground Natural Ground Natural 2: 1 D B ( Not to Scale) Flatter2:1 or SPECIAL LATERAL BASE DITCH FROM STA.12+65 -L- TO STA. 13+30 -L- LT DETAIL 1 B=2.0 Ft. Min. D=1.5 Ft. Ground Natural Slope Fill 2: 1 2:1 D ( Not to Scale) STANDARD ’V’ DITCH FROM STA 13+90 TO STA 14+10 -L- LT Min. D=1.0 Ft. DETAIL 3 Ground Natural Ground Natural SEE DETAIL 1 SPECIAL LATERAL BASE DITCH SEE DETAIL 2 STANDARD BASE DITCH REMOVE 0401 0403 0404 SEE DETAIL 4 SPECIAL LATERAL ’V’ DITCH SEE DETAIL 3 STANDARD ’V’ DITCH 0402 CB 15" RCP-IV O 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 600 610 620 630 640 650 660 600 610 620 630 640 650 660 - L - S T A . 11+ 8 0 .0 0 B E G I N G R A D E - L - S T A . 15 + 6 0 .0 0 E N D G R A D E E L = 6 4 4 .9 6 E L = 6 4 3 .8 8 V = >45 MPHV = >45 MPHDES DES -L- - L - S T A . 13 + 3 0 .0 0 B E G IN B R ID G E - L - S T A . 14 + 10 .0 0 E N D B R I D G E PI = 12+80.50 EL = 643.58’ (-)0.3000%(+)0.4000% VC = 70’ K = 100 (+)0.4000%(+)1.1750% PI = 15+26.00 EL = 644.56’ VC = 65’ K = 84 (-) 0.3077% (+) 4.0000%(+) 0.5000% EL = 638.20 STA 12+65 -L- BEGIN DITCH LT EL = 638.00 STA 13+30 -L- VPI DITCH LT EST = 120 CY NATURAL GROUND ROAD FILL TO EXCAVATE EXISTING CLASS II RIP RAP (TYP) NWS = WS(12/19/12) = 639.4’ EL = 639.40 STA 14+50 -L- END DITCH LT El = 637.40 PI =14+00.000 EL = 637.35 STA 13+90 -L- BEGIN DITCH LT (TYP) 3.5’ TO CAP (TYP) 1.5:1 NORMAL GP ELEV = 643.94’ SKEW = 90 W/ 2’-6" END CAP 1@25’; 1@55’ CL STA 13+70 -L- DESIGN DISCHARGE DESIGN FREQUENCY BASE DISCHARGE CFS YRS YRS BASE FREQUENCY OVERTOPPING ELEVATION OVERTOPPING FREQUENCY OVERTOPPING DISCHARGE CFS CFS YRS FT FT FT DESIGN HW ELEVATION BASE HW ELEVATION BRIDGE HYDRAULIC DATA DATE OF SURVEY W.S. ELEVATION AT DATE OF SURVEY FT = 100 DESIGN DISCHARGE DESIGN FREQUENCY BASE DISCHARGE CFS YRS YRS BASE FREQUENCY OVERTOPPING ELEVATION OVERTOPPING FREQUENCY OVERTOPPING DISCHARGE CFS CFS YRS FT FT FT DESIGN HW ELEVATION BASE HW ELEVATION BRIDGE HYDRAULIC DATA DATE OF SURVEY W.S. ELEVATION AT DATE OF SURVEY FT = 100 = 642.3 = 642.84 = 100+ = 643.64 = 639.4 = 950 = 1429 = 12-19-2012 = 25 = 1540 (-) 0.20% EL = 637.94 STA 13+60 -L- END DITCH LT EL. 641.05 15.25’ RT. -L- STA. 13+53.55 BM BL-2 12" CMP 15" RCP CONC S OIL S O I L S OIL INV=645.34’INV=645.00’ SR 1524 STEVENS MILL RD 20’BST GUY GUY GUY GUY GUY GUY T O WN O F S T A L L IN G S TOWN OF STALLINGS TOWN OF HEMBY BRIDGE T O WN O F H E M B Y B R ID G E T T T METER ELEC 12 " D I 12" DI 12" DI12" DI 12" DI UNK SIZE & TYPEUNK SIZE & TYPE BOX SPLICE 12 " D IP 48" WD RAIL & WW NC GRID NAD 83/NSRS 2007 16.36’ RT. -L- STA. 10+14.13 BL-1 27.16’ RT. -L- STA. 17+43.46 BL-3 EL. 641.05 15.25’ RT. -L- STA. 13+53.55 BL-2 N OR T H F OR K CR OOKE D CR E E K T R IB . 6 0 . 0 0 ’ EXISTING R/W EXISTING R/WEXISTING R/W EXISTING R/W N 3 5 0 0 ’0 2 " W 3 4 2 .4 0 ’ NAILPK VANN D. PRESSLEY DB 5375 PG 865 JANE H. VICKERY NO DEED FOUND TOWN OF STALLINGS DB 5334 PG 332 TOWN OF STALLINGS DB 5334 PG 332 RE V IS IO N S DO NOT USE FOR CONSTRUCTION PRELIMINARY PLANS ENGINEERING ETHERILLW Raleigh, N.C. 27606 Bus: 919 851 8077 Fax: 919 851 8107 CIVIL/SITE DESIGN - GIS/GPS - CONSTRUCTION OBSERVATION TRANSPORTATION PLANNING/DESIGN - BRIDGE/STRUCTURE DESIGN 559 Jones Franklin Rd. Suite 164 Liscense No. F-0377 SHEET NO.PROJECT REFERENCE NO. HYDRAULICSROADWAY DESIGN ENGINEER ENGINEER 4DB10-890262 R/W SHEET NO.8 / 1 7 / 9 9 1: 2 8 : 15 P M Q : \ 6 0 2 8 3 6 7 0 \ 4 0 0 _ T e c h n i c a l _ I n f o r m a t i o n _ D i s c _ F i l e s \ 4 5 0 _ N C D O T S t d T e c h D e s i g n F i l e s \ 8 9 0 2 6 2 \ H y d r a u l i c s \ P E R M I T S _ E n v i r o n m e n t a l \ D r a w i n g s \ D B 1 0 _ 8 9 0 2 6 2 _ R d y _ p s h . d g n r e m y r IMPACTS IN SURFACE WATER DENOTES PERMANENT SS IN WETLANDS DENOTES FILL TO SURFACE WATER DENOTES IMPACTS WETLAND DENOTES FILL INFF P O T S t a . 10 + 0 0 .0 0 10 P C S t a . 10 + 3 2 .2 3 P T S t a . 13 + 2 8 .3 5 15 P O T S t a . 17 + 5 2 .4 2 EX E X 11’ 11’ BEGIN TIP PROJECT DB10-890262 -L- STA. 11+80.00 50’ TAPER END TIP PROJECT DB10-890262 -L- STA. 15+60.00 PI Sta 11+80.29 D L = 296.12’ T = 148.07’ R = 20,000.00’ -L- SE = NC 50’ TAPER 11’ 11’ E X E X 8:1 0 3 0 2 0 2 23’ + 2 1.4 0 0 2 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 5 0 4 0 3 + 4 1.6 0 23’ TYPTYP 11’ 11’ 11’ 11’ 11’ 11’ 5 ’- 6 " S W 3 9 ’- 0 " -L-0 2 0 2 BEGIN APPROACH SLAB END APPROACH SLABBEGIN BRIDGE END BRIDGE -L- STA. 13+30.00 -L- STA. 13+19.00 -L- STA. 14+10.00 -L- STA. 14+21.00 SKETCH SHOWING BRIDGE/PAVEMENT RELATIONSHIP SEE SHEET S-1 THRU S-__ FOR STRUCTURE PLANS TYPE-III TYPE-III TYPE-III DR 16’ A T - 1 GRAU 350 TL-2 GRAU 350 TL-2 AT-1 + 3 0 . 0 0 TYPE-III 4 ’P . S . 4 ’P . S . 4 ’P .S . 4 ’P . S . + 10 . 0 0 4 ’- 8 1/4 " 4 ’- 2 1/4 " 3 0 ’- 10 1/2 " S W RT. B EG IN 4 " C O N C . + 7 1. 0 0 BEG IN C &G RT. + 6 6 . 0 0 DR 20’ S W RT. E N D 4 " C O N C . + 7 5 . 0 0 EN D C &G RT. + 8 0 . 0 0 890262-1 EX.R/W +56.75 EX.R/W +30.00 EX.R/W +95.00 890262-1 890262-2 890262-3 EX.R/W +05.31 47.84’ RT +22.60 47.56’ +39.19 45.00’ LT +28.35 45.00’ LT +10.00 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 600 610 620 630 640 650 660 600 610 620 630 640 650 660 - L - S T A . 11+ 8 0 .0 0 B E G I N G R A D E - L - S T A . 15 + 6 0 .0 0 E N D G R A D E E L = 6 4 4 .9 6 E L = 6 4 3 .8 8 V = >45 MPHV = >45 MPHDES DES -L- - L - S T A . 13 + 3 0 .0 0 B E G IN B R ID G E - L - S T A . 14 + 10 .0 0 E N D B R I D G E PI = 12+80.50 EL = 643.58’ (-)0.3000%(+)0.4000% VC = 70’ K = 100 (+)0.4000%(+)1.1750% PI = 15+26.00 EL = 644.56’ VC = 65’ K = 84 (-) 0.3077% (+) 4.0000%(+) 0.5000% EL = 638.20 STA 12+65 -L- BEGIN DITCH LT EL = 638.00 STA 13+30 -L- VPI DITCH LT EST = 120 CY NATURAL GROUND ROAD FILL TO EXCAVATE EXISTING CLASS II RIP RAP (TYP) NWS = WS(12/19/12) = 639.4’ EL = 639.40 STA 14+50 -L- END DITCH LT El = 637.40 PI =14+00.000 EL = 637.35 STA 13+90 -L- BEGIN DITCH LT (TYP) 3.5’ TO CAP (TYP) 1.5:1 NORMAL GP ELEV = 643.94’ SKEW = 90 W/ 2’-6" END CAP 1@25’; 1@55’ CL STA 13+70 -L- DESIGN DISCHARGE DESIGN FREQUENCY BASE DISCHARGE CFS YRS YRS BASE FREQUENCY OVERTOPPING ELEVATION OVERTOPPING FREQUENCY OVERTOPPING DISCHARGE CFS CFS YRS FT FT FT DESIGN HW ELEVATION BASE HW ELEVATION BRIDGE HYDRAULIC DATA DATE OF SURVEY W.S. ELEVATION AT DATE OF SURVEY FT = 100 DESIGN DISCHARGE DESIGN FREQUENCY BASE DISCHARGE CFS YRS YRS BASE FREQUENCY OVERTOPPING ELEVATION OVERTOPPING FREQUENCY OVERTOPPING DISCHARGE CFS CFS YRS FT FT FT DESIGN HW ELEVATION BASE HW ELEVATION BRIDGE HYDRAULIC DATA DATE OF SURVEY W.S. ELEVATION AT DATE OF SURVEY FT = 100 = 642.3 = 642.84 = 100+ = 643.64 = 639.4 = 950 = 1429 = 12-19-2012 = 25 = 1540 (-) 0.20% EL = 637.94 STA 13+60 -L- END DITCH LT EL. 641.05 15.25’ RT. -L- STA. 13+53.55 BM BL-2 SHEET 3 OF 5 PROFILE DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS UNION COUNTY PROJECT: DB10-890262 NORTH FORK CROOKED CREEK TRIB ON SR 1524 BRIDGE NO. 262 NCDOT (+)0.4000%(-)0.3000%(+)0.4000%(+)1.1750% 10+00 11+00 12+00 13+00 14+00 15+00 16+00 EXISTING GRADE PROPOSED GRADE NG RT NG LT NORMAL CROWN - LOWEST CHORD NWS = WS(12/19/12) = 639.4’ TO CAP (TYP) 1.5:1 NORMAL (TYP) 3.5’ 100 YR SCOUR CLASS II RIP RAP (TYP) EST = 120 CY NATURAL GROUND ROAD FILL TO EXCAVATE EXISTING GP ELEV = 643.94’ SKEW = 90 W/ 2’-6" END CAP 1@25’; 1@55’ CL STA 13+70 -L- 620 630 640 650 660 10/07/13 PROP 50 YR WSEL = 643.3’ PROP 100 YR WSEL = 644.00’ 890262-1 NAMES AND ADDRESSES PARCEL NO.ADDRESSESNAMES PROPERTY OWNERS SHEET 5 OF 5 10/07/13 DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS UNION COUNTY PROJECT: DB10-890262 NORTH FORK CROOKED CREEK TRIB ON SR 1524 BRIDGE NO. 262 NCDOT 890262-2 TOWN OF STALLINGS VANN D. PRESSLEY 890262-3 JANE H. VICKERY 315 STALLINGS ROAD STALLINGS, NC 28104 5325 STEVENS MILL ROAD MATTHEWS, NC 28104 131 LUMBERJACK CT BASTROP, TX 78602 S t e v e n s M ill R d Idlewild Rd Quarter Horse Ln B utter n ut L n Idlewild Rd N orth Fork Crooked Creek Bridge 262 - Union CountyStevens Mill Road 0 520 1,040 1,560 2,080260Feet Figure 1 ³ !A S t e v e n s M ill R d Idlewild Rd Quarter Horse Ln B utter n ut L n Idlewild Rd N orth Fork Crooked Creek Bridge 262 - Union CountyStevens Mill Road 0 520 1,040 1,560 2,080260Feet Figure 2 ³ !A ScA TbB2 GfB2 ChA ScA TbB2 ScA TbB2 TbB2 TbB2 TbB2 TbB2 TbB2 CeB2 TbB2 TbB2 CeB2 TbC2 HeB TuB TbC2 TbB2 S t e v e n s M ill R d Idlewild Rd Quarter Horse Ln B utter n ut L n Idlewild Rd N orth Fork Crooked Creek Bridge 262 - Union CountyStevens Mill Road 0 520 1,040 1,560 2,080260Feet Figure 3 ³ !A Ou t l e t SR 1 5 2 4 ( S t e v e n s M i l l R o a d ) U n i o n C o u n t y Channel Impacts