HomeMy WebLinkAbout20131248 Ver 2_Application_20131210
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
PAT L. MCCRORY ANTHONY J. TATA
GOVERNOR SECRETARY
MAILING ADDRESS:
NC DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
PROJECT DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS
NATURAL ENVIRONMENT SECTION
1598 MAIL SERVICE CENTER
RALEIGH NC 27699-1598
TELEPHONE: 919-707-6100
FAX: 919-212-5785
WEBSITE: WWW.NCDOT.ORG
PHYSICAL ADDRESS:
Century Center - Building B
1020 Birch Ridge Dr
Raleigh, NC 27610-4328
December 10, 2013
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Regulatory Field Office
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, NC 27587
ATTN: Mr. Eric Alsmeyer
NCDOT Division 5 Project Coordinator
SUBJECT: Application for Section 404 Nationwide Permits 13, 23, and 33; Section 401 Water
Quality Certification; and Neuse River Riparian Buffer Authorization for the I-40/440
Pavement Reconstruction – Area 3 Project, Wake County, North Carolina. Federal Aid
Project Nos. IMS-040-4(147)298 and IMS-0440(13), TIP Nos. I-5338 and I-5311.
Debit $570.00 from WBS Element No. 46265.3.1
Dear Sir:
The North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) proposes pavement reconstruction of I-
40/440, beginning at the I-40/US 64/US 1 interchange west of SR 1319 (Jones Franklin Road), continuing
east along I-40/440 and onto I-440/US 64, and terminating north of the I-440 interchange with US 64/US
264. This construction project is comprised of three smaller projects, each of which will be permitted
separately. The three smaller projects include: 1) the initial 3-lane maintenance of traffic (MOT)
temporary widening project, 2) the Area 3 project, which begins near the I-40/440 interchange (Station
444+00) and continues northeast to the end of the project, just north of the I-440 interchange with US
64/US 264 (Station 628+60), and 3) the final project consisting of Areas 1, 2A, and 2B, beginning at
Station 19+02 near the I-40/US 64/US 1 interchange and continuing east to Station 444+00, just west of
the I-40/440 interchange.
A Neuse River Riparian Buffer Authorization and North Carolina State General Permit for Impacts to
Isolated and Other Non-404 Jurisdictional Wetlands and Waters were previously requested for the initial
MOT project in an application dated December 2, 2013. This Section 404/401 permit application and
Neuse River Riparian Buffer Authorization request are for the Area 3 project. Subsequent
applications/modifications will be submitted for Areas 1, 2A, and 2B as project design progresses.
Please find enclosed the Pre-construction Notification (PCN), Jeffrey’s Warehouse Mitigation Site Debit
Ledger, Stormwater Management Plan, permit drawings, buffer drawings, and roadway design plans for
Pre-Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A. Applicant Information
1. Processing
1a. Type(s) of approval sought from the
Corps: Section 404 Permit Section 10 Permit
1b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 13 23 33 or General Permit (GP) number:
1c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps? Yes No
1d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
401 Water Quality Certification – Regular Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
401 Water Quality Certification – Express Riparian Buffer Authorization
1e. Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWQ 401
Certification:
Yes No
For the record only for Corps Permit:
Yes No
1f. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in-lieu fee program proposed for mitigation
of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in-lieu
fee program.
Yes No
1g. Is the project located in any of NC’s twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1h
below.
Yes No
1h. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)? Yes No
2. Project Information
2a. Name of project: I-40/440 Pavement Reconstruction - Area 3 Project
2b. County: Wake
2c. Nearest municipality / town: Raleigh
2d. Subdivision name: not applicable
2e. NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state
project no: TIP# I-5338 and TIP# I-5311
3. Owner Information
3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed: North Carolina Department of Transportation
3b. Deed Book and Page No. not applicable
3c. Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable): not applicable
3d. Street address: 1598 Mail Service Center
3e. City, state, zip: Raleigh, NC 27699-1598
3f. Telephone no.: (919) 707-6136
3g. Fax no.: (919) 212-5785
3h. Email address: jsmason@ncdot.gov
Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no. _____________
DWQ project no. _______________
Form Version 1.3 Dec 10 2008
1
4. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a. Applicant is: Agent Other, specify:
4b. Name: not applicable
4c. Business name
(if applicable):
4d. Street address:
4e. City, state, zip:
4f. Telephone no.:
4g. Fax no.:
4h. Email address:
5. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a. Name: not applicable
5b. Business name
(if applicable):
5c. Street address:
5d. City, state, zip:
5e. Telephone no.:
5f. Fax no.:
5g. Email address:
2
B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID): not applicable
1b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees): Latitude: 35.767816 Longitude: - 78.574221
(DD.DDDDDD) (-DD.DDDDDD)
1c. Property size: 680 acres
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc.) to
proposed project: Crabtree Creek and Walnut Creek
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water: C;NSW
2c. River basin: Neuse
3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
Both I-40 and I-440 are classified as Interstate based on the North Carolina Functional Classification System. The project
area consists of maintained NCDOT right-of-way along I-40/440 and is primarily composed of maintained fill slopes,
paved shoulders and interchanges, and forested edges adjacent to the roadway. Land use within the vicinity includes
forested, commercial, industrial, medium- to high-density residential, agricultural, recreational, and infrastructure-related.
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
4.9 acres jurisdictional wetland; 0.27 acre non-jurisdictional, isolated wetland
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property:
12,248 LF
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
The purpose of the pavement reconstruction project is to address deteriorating road conditions by replacing deficient
pavement and road-bed material in order to improve the quality of the road along the project corridor, while still
maintaining traffic during project construction. The purpose of the Area 3 project is to reconstruct pavement within the
Area 3 footprint, while also improving the stormwater drainage and overall hydraulic drainage system.
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
The North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) proposes pavement reconstruction of I-40/440, beginning at
the I-40/US 64/US 1 interchange west of SR 1319 (Jones Franklin Road), continuing east along I-40/440 and onto I-
440/US 64, and terminating north of the I-440 interchange with US 64/US 264. The Area 3 project begins near the I-
40/440 interchange (Station 444+00) and continues northeast to the end of the project, just north of the I-440 interchange
with US 64/US 264 (Station 628+60). Construction activities associated with the Area 3 project include pavement
reconstruction, minor modifications to existing fill slopes associated with the pavement reconstruction, storm drain system
pipe replacement, maintenance and protection of existing drainage structures, culvert preservation/slip lining, sediment
removal from culverts and streams, temporary stream dewatering, and stream bank stabilization. All practical alternatives
will be utilized to minimize the project footprint associated with the pavement reconstruction project. Standard road
building equipment such as trucks, dozers, backhoes, and cranes will be used.
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
project (including all prior phases) in the past?
Comments:
Yes No Unknown
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
of determination was made? Preliminary Final
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known): Jim Mason (I-5311); Elizabeth Workman-
Maurer (I-5338)
Agency/Consultant Company: NCDOT (I-5311); RK&K (I-
5338)
Other:
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
I-5311 Preliminary JD issued April 19, 2013 and updated on October 2, 2013; I-5338 Approved JD issued on April 1,
2013. JDs were provided with the previously-submitted MOT permit application.
3
5. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
this project (including all prior phases) in the past? Yes No Unknown
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to “help file” instructions.
A Neuse River Riparian Buffer Authorization and North Carolina State General Permit for Impacts to Isolated and Other
Non-404 Jurisdictional Wetlands and Waters have been requested for the initial Maintenance of Traffic (MOT) project.
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project? Yes No
6b. If yes, explain.
This reconstruction project is comprised of three smaller projects, each of which will be permitted separately. The three
smaller projects include: 1) the initial 3-lane maintenance of traffic (MOT) temporary widening project, 2) the Area 3
project, which begins near the I-40/440 interchange (Station 444+00) and continues northeast to the end of the project,
just north of the I-440 interchange with US 64/US 264 (Station 628+60), and 3) the final project consisting of Areas 1, 2A,
and 2B, beginning at Station 19+02 near the I-40/US 64/US 1 interchange and continuing east to Station 444+00, just
west of the I-40/440 interchange. A Neuse River Riparian Buffer Authorization and North Carolina State General Permit
for Impacts to Isolated and Other Non-404 Jurisdictional Wetlands and Waters were previously requested for the initial
MOT project. The current Section 404/401 permit application and Neuse River Riparian Buffer Authorization request are
for the Area 3 project. Subsequent applications/modifications will be submitted for Areas 1, 2A, and 2B as project design
progresses.
4
C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
Wetlands Streams - tributaries Buffers
Open Waters Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a.
Wetland impact
number –
Permanent (P) or
Temporary (T)
2b.
Type of impact
2c.
Type of wetland
(if known)
2d.
Forested
2e.
Type of jurisdiction
(Corps - 404, 10
DWQ – non-404, other)
2f.
Area of impact
(acres)
Site 1 P T Yes
No
Corps
DWQ
Site 2 P T Yes
No
Corps
DWQ
Site 3 P T Yes
No
Corps
DWQ
Site 4 P T Yes
No
Corps
DWQ
Site 5 P T Yes
No
Corps
DWQ
Site 6 P T Yes
No
Corps
DWQ
2g. Total wetland impacts Perm.: 0 ac.
Temp.: 0 ac.
2h. Comments: A total of 0.05 acres of hand clearing will occur at Site 3202 within riparian wetland WGH. Work in this area
will occur on mats.
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a.
Stream impact
number -
Permanent (P) or
Temporary (T)
3b.
Type of impact
3c.
Stream name
3d.
Perennial
(PER) or
intermittent
(INT)?
3e.
Type of
jurisdiction
(Corps - 404, 10
DWQ – non-404,
other)
3f.
Average
stream
width
(feet)
3g.
Impact length
(linear feet)
Site 1 P T PER
INT
Corps
DWQ
Site 2 P T PER
INT
Corps
DWQ
Site 3 P T PER
INT
Corps
DWQ
Site 4 P T PER
INT
Corps
DWQ
Site 5 P T PER
INT
Corps
DWQ
Site 6 P T PER
INT
Corps
DWQ
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts Perm:45 LF
Temp:831 LF
3i. Comments: See the attached stream impact table for site-by-site impacts.
5
4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individually list all open water impacts below.
4a.
Open water
impact number –
Permanent (P) or
Temporary (T)
4b.
Name of
waterbody
(if applicable)
4c.
Type of impact
4d.
Waterbody type
4e.
Area of impact (acres)
O1 P T
O2 P T
O3 P T
O4 P T
4f. Total open water impacts Perm.: 0
Temp.: 0
4g. Comments: No open water impacts will result from the Area 3 project.
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, then complete the chart below.
5a.
Pond ID
number
5b.
Proposed use or
purpose of pond
5c.
Wetland Impacts (acres)
5d.
Stream Impacts (feet)
5e.
Upland
(acres)
Flooded Filled Excavat
ed Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded
P1
P2
5f. Total
5g. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
Yes No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
6
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer
impacts below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a.
Project is in which protected basin?
Neuse Tar-Pamlico Other:
Catawba Randleman
6b.
Buffer impact
number –
Permanent (P) or
Temporary (T)
6c.
Reason for impact
6d.
Stream name
6e.
Buffer
mitigation
required?
6f.
Zone 1 impact
(square feet)
6g.
Zone 2 impact
(square feet)
B1 P T Yes
No
B2 P T Yes
No
B3 P T Yes
No
6h. Total buffer impacts 45,826 23,905
6i. Comments: See the attached buffer impact table for site-by-site impacts.
7
D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
For the Area 3 project, jurisdictional impacts to wetlands have been avoided. Jurisdictional stream impacts have been
minimized to only those impacts associated with the maintenance and protection of existing drainage structures and to
areas requiring bank stabilization. Sediment removal within the culverts and streams has been limited only to the areas
required to achieve positive drainage. A majority of buffer impacts have also been minimized to affect only those areas
where maintenance and protection of existing structures will occur.
1b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
Best Management Practices (BMP) and measures will be used to reduce stormwater impacts to receiving waters and
minimize erosion and runoff from the construction sites. Where feasible, all equipment and material staging areas will be
located outside of protected riparian buffers, wetlands, and streams and will be located within uplands.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
Yes No
If no, explain:
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply): DWQ Corps
2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
project?
Mitigation bank
Payment to in-lieu fee program
Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank: not applicable
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter) Type Quantity
3c. Comments:
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In-lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in-lieu fee program is attached. Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested: 0 linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature: warm cool cold
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only): 0 square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested: 0 acres
4f. Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested: 0 acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested: 0 acres
4h. Comments: The Jeffrey's Warehouse Mitigation Site will be used to offset mitigable stream impacts (10 lin. ft. @ 2:1 = 20
lin. ft. of mitigation) and buffer impacts (see impacts below) associated with these projects.
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
Please see the attached Jeffrey's Warehouse Mitigation Site Debit Ledger
8
6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) – required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
buffer mitigation?
Yes No
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
Zone
6c.
Reason for impact
6d.
Total impact
(square feet)
Multiplier
6e.
Required mitigation
(square feet)
Zone 1 N/A 0 3 (2 for Catawba) 0
Zone 2 Parallel Impacts 2,574 1.5 3,861
6f. Total buffer mitigation required: 3,861
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in-lieu fee fund).
Permittee responsible mitigation will be used to offset mitigable buffer impacts for this project. Please see the Jeffrey's
Warehouse Mitigation Site Debit Ledger.
6h. Comments:
9
E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
Yes No
1b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If not, explain why.
Comments: See attached permit drawings. Yes No
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project? N/A
2b. Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan? Yes No
2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why:
2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
See attached Stormwater Management Plan.
2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
Certified Local Government
DWQ Stormwater Program
DWQ 401 Unit
3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a. In which local government’s jurisdiction is this project? not applicable
3b. Which of the following locally-implemented stormwater management programs
apply (check all that apply):
Phase II
NSW
USMP
Water Supply Watershed
Other:
3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
attached?
Yes No
4. DWQ Stormwater Program Review
4a. Which of the following state-implemented stormwater management programs apply
(check all that apply):
Coastal counties
HQW
ORW
Session Law 2006-246
Other:
4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
attached? Yes No n/a
5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements? Yes No N/A
5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met? Yes No N/A
10
F. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the
use of public (federal/state) land? Yes No
1b. If you answered “yes” to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Yes No
1c. If you answered “yes” to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
letter.)
Comments:
Yes No
2. Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards,
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
Yes No
2b. Is this an after-the-fact permit application? Yes No
2c. If you answered “yes” to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s): n/a
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
Yes
No
3b. If you answered “yes” to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered “no,” provide a short narrative description.
The proposed pavement reconstruction project will modernize and improve existing transportation facilities but will not
increase traffic volumes or result in additional development. Therefore, a detailed indirect or cumulative effects study will
not be necessary.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
n/a
11
3a.3b.3c.3d.3e.3f.3g.
Site
Number
TIP #Stream Impact
Permanent (P) or
Temporary (T)
Type of Impact Stream Name Perennial
(PER) or
Intermittent
(INT)?
Type of jurisdiction
(Corps-404, 10
DWQ-non-404,
other
Average
Stream
Width
(feet)
Impact
Length
(linear
feet)
3201 I-5338 T Dewatering UT Walnut Creek
(SZ)INT Corps - 404 7 224
3202 I-5338 T Dewatering UT Walnut Creek
(SBB)INT Corps - 404 3 73
3301 I-5338 T Dewatering UT Walnut Creek
(SAA)PER Corps - 404 4 28
3301 I-5338 P Permanent Fill UT Walnut Creek
(SAA)PER Corps - 404 4 10
3701 I-5311 T Dewatering UT Walnut Creek
(SI)INT Corps - 404 5 240
3701 I-5311 P Bank Stabilization UT Walnut Creek
(SI)INT Corps - 404 5 10
3702 I-5311 T Dewatering UT Walnut Creek
(SH)INT Corps - 404 5 60
3702 I-5311 P Bank Stabilization UT Walnut Creek
(SH)INT Corps - 404 5 10
3801 I-5311 T Dewatering UT Walnut Creek
(SM)PER Corps - 404 5 70
3801 I-5311 P Bank Stabilization UT Walnut Creek
(SM)PER Corps - 404 5 5
3802 I-5311 T Dewatering UT Crabtree Creek
(SG)INT Corps - 404 4 22
3901 I-5311 T Dewatering UT Crabtree Creek
(SF)PER Corps - 404 2 40
4001 I-5311 T Dewatering UT Crabtree Creek
(SE)PER Corps - 404 4 56
4001 I-5311 P Bank Stabilization UT Crabtree Creek
(SE)PER Corps - 404 4 10
Temp:813
Perm:45
3i. Comments:Temporary dewatering is required for the maintenance and protection of existing drainage structures and sediment
removal within the culverts and streams to achieve positive drainage.
Stream Impact Table
3h.Total Stream and Tributary Impacts
6b.6c.6d.6e.6f.6g.
Site
Number
TIP #Buffer Impact
Permanent (P) or
Temporary (T)
Reason for Impact Stream name Buffer
mitigation
required?
Zone 1
impact
(square
feet)
Zone 2
impact
(square
feet
3201 I-5338 P Protection of Existing
Structure
Unnamed Trib to Walnut
Creek (SZ)No 7490 2324
3202 I-5338 P Protection of Existing
Structure
Unnamed Trib to Walnut
Creek (SBB)No 3321 2566
3301 I-5338 P Protection of Existing
Structure
Unnamed Trib to Walnut
Creek (SAA)No 4232 3991
3601 I-5311 P Road Crossing Walnut Creek No 2848 2014
3602 I-5311 P Parallel Unnamed Trib to Walnut
Creek (SJ)Yes 0 2574
3701 I-5311 P Protection of Existing
Structure
Unnamed Trib to Walnut
Creek (SI)No 8599 1188
3702 I-5311 P Protection of Existing
Structure
Unnamed Trib to Walnut
Creek (SH)No 3001 429
3801 I-5311 P Protection of Existing
Structure
Unnamed Trib to Walnut
Creek (SM)No 6066 3186
3802 I-5311 P Protection of Existing
Structure
Unnamed Trib to Crabtree
Creek (SG)No 3356 2078
3901 I-5311 P Protection of Existing
Structure
Unnamed Trib to Crabtree
Creek (SF)No 782 560
4001 I-5311 P Protection of Existing
Structure
Unnamed Trib to Crabtree
Creek (SE)No 5525 2897
4101 I-5311 P Bridge Crabtree Creek No 606 98
4582623905
6i. Comments
6h.Total Buffer Impacts
Buffer Impacts Table
COMPENSATORY MITIGATION
The Jeffrey’s Warehouse Mitigation Site is located in HUC 03020201 and was originally
constructed as on-site mitigation for R-1030 (US 117 from south of NC 581 in Goldsboro to the
US 264 Bypass in Wilson). There are two parcels associated with this mitigation site. The west
parcel (approximately 50.2 acres) is bounded on the northwest by the Little River and on the
southeast by the US 117 right-of-way. The east parcel (approximately 37.5 acres) is bounded
on the northwest by the US 117 right-of-way, on the northeast by a Wayne County Board of
Education school bus maintenance shop, and on the east and southeast by private property.
The site was constructed in 2006 and has undergone five years of hydrologic and vegetative
monitoring.
Mitigation for this project is proposed to be provided by the North Carolina Department of
Transportation, which is an allowable option per the Federal Mitigation Rule, 33 CFR chapter II
332.3 (b) (1)-(6). The NCDOT has been providing mitigation for road projects for almost 20 years
and has established a record of acquiring, designing, and constructing successful mitigation
sites with over 225 closed out sites protected in perpetuity either through fee-simple
ownership or conservation easements throughout the state. Remaining, available credits on
these and other post-construction mitigation sites are tracked on the NCDOT’s On-site Debit
Ledger (ODL). Therefore, ODL mitigation proposals involve sites that are constructed and
functioning prior to the impacts resulting in a reduced temporal lag and reduced uncertainty
about project success. In addition to location and availability, the cost of the compensatory
mitigation project is another general consideration when determining the most appropriate
mitigation option. Acquiring advance mitigation from EEP would not be fiscally responsible
when the Department has available assets on the ODL.
NCDOT proposes the use of Jeffrey’s Warehouse Mitigation Site as environmentally preferable
to other options, which is consistent with the criteria set forth in 332.3(a) (1) of the Rule.
Jeffrey’s Warehouse Mitigation site will be debited 20 linear stream feet and 3,861 sq. ft. of
buffer mitigation for I-5311/I-5338 Area 3.
JEFFREYS WAREHOUSE ONSITE DEBIT LEDGER
HUC Mitigation Type Starting Amount Additional Notes
3020201 Stream Restoration 3731 Linear Feet
3020201 Riverine Wetland
Restoration
3.66 Acres
3020201 Riverine Wetland
Preservation
12.36 Acres
3020201 Buffer Restoration 316507 Square Feet
3020201 Non Riverine
Wetland Restoration
16.23 Acres
Mitigation Type Debit Amount
(Linear Feet) Site TIP Action ID#
Stream Restoration 452 B-3528 262ft@2:1 2008-00153
Stream Restoration 61 U-4011 2005-20914
Stream Restoration 25 U-3344A 2003-20445
Stream Restoration 279 EB-4993 2011-00602
Stream Restoration 174 R-3825a 2011-01695
Stream Restoration 63 B-4785 2013-01010
Stream Restoration 20 I-5311/I-5338 Area 3 (2:1 ratio)
Mitigation Type Debit Amount
(Acres) Site TIP Action ID#
Riverine Wetland
Restoration
2.49 R-2814A&B 2008-01316
Riverine Wetland
Restoration
0.21 R-2554A
Mitigation Type Debit Amount
(Acres) Site TIP Action ID#
Riverine Wetland
Preservation
3.05 R-2814A&B 2008-01316
Riverine Wetland
Preservation
8.61 R-2554A 2008-00252
Mitigation Type Debit Amount
(Acres) Site TIP Action ID#
Non Riverine Wetland
Restoration
2.76 R-2719A 2008-02460
Non Riverine Wetland
Restoration
0.92 B-4304 2004-20510
Non Riverine Wetland
Restoration
1.96 R-2814A&B 2008-01316
Mitigation Type
Debit Amount
(Square
Feet)
Site TIP Action ID#
Buffer Restoration 38648 B-4300 2004-20705
Buffer Restoration 161453 R-2719A 2008-02460
Buffer Restoration 3653 B-4304 2004-20510
Buffer Restoration 16398 B-4592 2008-02056
Buffer Restoration 24458 U-4703 2005-20126
Buffer Restoration 45558 U-3344A 2003-20445
Buffer Restoration 11393 Div Proj. SR 1340 2C.054015 2010-00420
Buffer Restoration 2199 DIV Proj SR1204 WBS # 4C.096071
Buffer Restoration 3,861 I-5311/I5338 Area 3 (1.5:1 ratio)
(Version 1.2; Released September 2011)
I-5338/I/5311 County(ies):Wake Page 1 of 4
Project Type:Date:
Phone:Phone:
Email:Email:
County(ies):
CAMA County?
Design/Future:Existing:
Supplemental:See Environmental Summary
Primary:
See Environmental Summary
Neuse
See Environmental Summary
dan.robinson@kimley-horn.com
-L3- (after I40/440 interchange): 4 @ 12' lanes divided by a retained existing median barrier and 10' to 11'
interior shoulders and 14' outside shoulders with lateral and cut ditches where necessary
-L3- (after I40/440 interchange): 4 @ 12' lanes divided by median barrier and 10' to 11' interior shoulder and
11' outside shoulders with lateral and cut ditches
Neuse
NCDWQ Stream Index No.:
Project/TIP No.:
NCDOT Contact:
Project No.:I-5338/I/5311
Contractor / Designer:
lbrooks@ncdot.gov
Raleigh, NC 27610
General Project Information
Address:
11/22/2013
3001 Weston Parkway
1020 Birch Ridge Road Cary, NC 27513
North Carolina Department of Transportation
Highway Stormwater Program
STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN
FOR LINEAR ROADWAY PROJECTS
Lonnie Brooks
Roadway Widening
ac.
General Project Narrative:The Design-Build project combining I5338 and I5311 consists of pavement reconstruction of I-40/440 from the I-40/US 64 Interchange west of SR 1319 (Jones Franklin Road)
continuing along I-440/US 64 to north of US 64/US 264. This Storm Water Management Plan pertains to Area 3 of the project and is located in Wake County. Area 3 begins
from Sta. 444+00 -L1- (immediately before the I40/440 interchange) and continues northeast to the end of the project just north of US 64/US 264 interchange. The majority of
Area 3 is the replacement of the road surface with very little increase in total impervious area and storm drain systems to be replaced at the same location with the same size
pipes as the existing storm drain system. BMPs were used where ever possible to minimize the effects of stormwater runoff from the project. Although the majority of the
project consists of replacing existing storm drain system in place, any new pipe system outfalls were stategically located to not outlet into wetlands/buffers and incorporated
BMPs for treatment where practical.
Typical Cross Section Description:
References
126,025
64.40
Average Daily Traffic (veh/hr/day):
ac.
Other Stream Classification:
Kimley-Horn and Associates
City/Town:
919-677-2000
NCDOT - Transportation Program Management Unit Address:
Raleigh
919-707-6619
Wake
No
See Environmental Summary
NCDWQ Surface Water Classification for Primary Receiving Water
303(d) Impairments:
River Basin(s):
Primary Receiving Water:
See Environmental Summary
Buffer Rules in Effect
Project Description
See Environmental Summary
Surrounding Land Use:Urban3.496 mi. (Area 3 only)
184,600
62.60Project Built-Upon Area (ac.)
Proposed Project Existing Site
Project Length (lin. Miles or feet):
(Version 1.2; Released September 2011)
I-5338/I/5311 County(ies):Wake Page 2 of 4
Sheet
No.
Station
(From / To)
Feature
Impacted
Water / Wetland /
Buffer Type
Receiving Surface
Water Name
NRTR Map
ID
NCDWQ Stream
Index
NCDWQ Surface
Water Classification
303(d)
Impairments Type of Impact
Existing
SCM
460+68 -L2LT-
462+81 -L2LT-
460+26 -L2LT-
462+96 -L2LT-
469+75 -L2LT-
470+58 -L2LT-
469+75 -L2LT-
470+57 -L2LT-
469+42 -L2LT-
470+88 -L2LT-
485+60 -L2LT-
485+70 -L2LT-
484+80 -L2LT-
485+76 -L2LT-
525+87 -L3-
527+45 -L3-
527+99 -L3-
530+91 -L3-
539+49 -L3-
539+90 -L3-
539+66 -L3-
540+43 -L3-
550+87 -L3-
552+24 -L3-
550+77 -L3-
552+40 -L3-
561+10 -L3-
564+09 -L3-
13+82 -RP15B-
19+50 -RP15C-
577+44 -L3-
577+81 -L3-
18+80 -RP15A-
17+81 -RP15A-
Unnamed Trib to
Crabtree Creek
C, NSW
C, NSW
C, NSW
C, NSW
C, NSW
C, NSW
C, NSW
C, NSW
C, NSW
C, NSW
C, NSW
C, NSW
C, NSW
C, NSW
Surface Water Impacts
3301
Unnamed Trib to
Walnut Creek
Unnamed Trib to
Walnut Creek
Unnamed Trib to
Walnut Creek
Unnamed Trib to
Walnut Creek
Neuse
Neuse
Intermittent
Non-Tidal
Freshwater Marsh
Unnamed Trib to
Walnut Creek
Unnamed Trib to
Walnut Creek
Unnamed Trib to
Walnut Creek
3201 Intermittent Aquatic life, Fish
consumption
Buffer
N/A
Clearing
Aquatic life, Fish
consumption
Dewatering/ Bank
stabilization
Buffer3201
Neuse
Walnut Creek
Aquatic life, Fish
consumption
Aquatic life, Fish
consumption
Wetland
27-33-(10)
3202
Perennial
Dewatering
N/A
Buffer3801
Buffer
27-33-(10)
C, NSW
C, NSW
C, NSW
Description of Minimization of Impacts or Mitigation
Neuse
All proposed SCMs listed must also be listed under Swales, Preformed Sour Holes and other Energy Dissipators, or Other Stormwater Control Measures.
3802
27-34-(4)
27-34-(4)
Aquatic life, Fish
consumption
Aquatic life, Fish
consumption
Dewatering/ Bank
stabilization
Unnamed Trib to
Walnut Creek
Unnamed Trib to
Walnut Creek
Aquatic life, Fish
consumption
Clearing
27-34-(4)
Aquatic life, Fish
consumption
Aquatic life, Fish
consumption
Unnamed Trib to
Walnut Creek
Proposed
SCM
N/A
N/A
N/A
North Carolina Department of Transportation
Highway Stormwater Program
27-34-(4)Aquatic life, Fish
consumption Clearing3301
Clearing27-34-(4)
27-34-(4)
27-34-(4)
27-34-(4)
N/A27-34-(4)
Unnamed Trib to
Walnut Creek
Unnamed Trib to
Walnut Creek
Unnamed Trib to
Walnut Creek
Unnamed Trib to
Crabtree Creek
N/A
Dewatering/ Bank
stabilization
27-34-(4)
Clearing
Aquatic life, Fish
consumption
Unnamed Trib to
Walnut Creek
3702
3701
3601 Neuse
3701 Neuse
Buffer
Stream
Buffer
Intermittent
Stream
27-34-(4)
27-34-(4)Dewatering
Aquatic life, Fish
consumption
3702 Buffer Neuse
3202
Buffer
Stream Intermittent
3802
Stream
Stream
Perennial
Intermittent
Neuse
Clearing
Clearing27-34-(4)
Aquatic life, Fish
consumption Clearing
Aquatic life, Fish
consumption
Clearing
27-34-(4)Aquatic life, Fish
consumption
Dewatering/ Bank
stabilization
Stream
Aquatic life, Fish
consumption Fill3602BufferNeuse27-34-(4)
3202 Dewatering
Aquatic life, Fish
consumption
Project/TIP No.:
* List all stream and surface water impact locations regardless of jurisdiction or size.
Project Environmental Summary
Stream
3801
Equalizer Pipes to be noted as a minimization of impacts.
References
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN
FOR LINEAR ROADWAY PROJECTS
(Version 1.2; Released September 2011)
I-5338/I/5311 County(ies):Wake Page 3 of 4
Sheet
No.
Station
(From / To)
Feature
Impacted
Water / Wetland /
Buffer Type
Receiving Surface
Water Name
NRTR Map
ID
NCDWQ Stream
Index
NCDWQ Surface
Water Classification
303(d)
Impairments Type of Impact
Existing
SCM
589+25 -L3-
589+50 -L3-
589+31 -L3-
590+10 -L3-
599+36 -L3-
599+47 -L3-
599+03 -L3-
14+60 -RP16B-
622+18 -L3-
622+69 -L3-
Unnamed Trib to
Crabtree Creek
Unnamed Trib to
Crabtree Creek
North Carolina Department of Transportation
3901 Clearing
Description of Minimization of Impacts or Mitigation
References
Equalizer Pipes to be noted as a minimization of impacts.
All proposed SCMs listed must also be listed under Swales, Preformed Sour Holes and other Energy Dissipators, or Other Stormwater Control Measures.
C, NSW
C, NSW
C, NSW
Buffer
Stream
Neuse
Project Environmental Summary
C, NSW
4001
Buffer Neuse
Unnamed Trib to
Crabtree Creek
Aquatic life, Fish
consumption
4001
Project/TIP No.:
Stream Dewatering/ Bank
stabilization
Aquatic life, Fish
consumption
C, NSW
ClearingAquatic life, Fish
consumptionCrabtree Creek4101
DewateringAquatic life, Fish
consumption27-33-(10)
Highway Stormwater Program
27-33-(10)
Perennial
N/A
N/A
Unnamed Trib to
Crabtree Creek
27-33-(10)
27-33-(10)
Surface Water Impacts
N/A
Aquatic life, Fish
consumption
N/A
Clearing
3901
* List all stream and surface water impact locations regardless of jurisdiction or size.
27-33-(10)
Buffer Neuse N/A
Proposed
SCM
Perennial
STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN
FOR LINEAR ROADWAY PROJECTS
(Version 1.2; Released September 2011)
I-5338/I/5311 County(ies):Wake Page4 of 4
Sheet
No.Station
Energy Dissipator
Type Riprap Type
Drainage Area
(ac)
Q10
(cfs)
V10
(fps)
* Refer to the NCDOT Best Management Practices Toolbox, Version 1 (March 2008), NCDOT Standard Details, the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) Hydraulic Engineering Circular No. 14 (HEC-14),
Third Edition, Hydraulic Design of Energy Dissipators for Culverts and Channels (July 2006), as applicable, for design guidance and criteria.
35
North Carolina Department of Transportation
Highway Stormwater Program
1.28Class 'B'7.2
Preformed Scour Holes and Energy Dissipators
3.3 1.40.59
Pipe/Structure
Dimensions
(in)
Pipe
Conveyance Structure
15
Project/TIP No.:
PFSH
Class 'B'
518+38 -L3-1.818
Pipe39593+00 -L3-PFSH
Additional Comments
Have minimum design criteria, as presented in the NCDOT Best Management Practices Toolbox (2008), NCDOT Standard Details, or FHWA
HEC-14 (July 2006), been met and verified, as applicable? If No, provide further explanantion of why design criteria was not met.
STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN
FOR LINEAR ROADWAY PROJECTS
YES NO
Copyright (C) 2009 MyTopo
07
8
°
4
4
'
0
0
.
0
0
"
W
07
8
°
4
4
'
0
0
.
0
0
"
W
07
8
°
4
0
'
0
0
.
0
0
"
W
07
8
°
4
0
'
0
0
.
0
0
"
W
078° 36' 00.00" W 078° 36' 00.00" W
035°49'00.00"N
035°49'00.00"N
035°48'00.00"N
035°48'00.00"N
035°47'00.00"N
035°47'00.00"N
035°46'00.00"N
035°46'00.00"N
035°45'00.00"N
035°45'00.00"N
00.00"N
00.00"N
SC
A
L
E
1
:
5
0
0
0
0
0
10
0
0
0
20
0
0
0
30
0
0
0
FE
E
T
NS
BE
G
I
N
A
R
E
A
3
44
4
+
0
0
-
L
1
-
END AREA 3 628+60 -L3-
Ha
n
d
Ex
i
s
t
i
n
g
E
x
i
s
t
i
n
g
Pe
r
m
a
n
e
n
t
T
e
m
p
.
E
x
c
a
v
a
t
i
o
n
M
e
c
h
a
n
i
z
e
d
C
l
e
a
r
i
n
g
P
e
r
m
a
n
e
n
t
T
e
m
p
.
C
h
a
n
n
e
l
C
h
a
n
n
e
l
N
a
t
u
r
a
l
Si
t
e
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
St
r
u
c
t
u
r
e
Fi
l
l
I
n
F
i
l
l
I
n
i
n
C
l
e
a
r
i
n
g
i
n
S
W
S
W
I
m
p
a
c
t
s
I
m
p
a
c
t
s
S
t
r
e
a
m
No
.
(
F
r
o
m
/
T
o
)
Si
z
e
/
T
y
p
e
W
e
t
l
a
n
d
s
W
e
t
l
a
n
d
s
W
e
t
l
a
n
d
s
i
n
W
e
t
l
a
n
d
s
W
e
t
l
a
n
d
s
i
m
p
a
c
t
s
i
m
p
a
c
t
s
P
e
r
m
a
n
e
n
t
T
e
m
p
.
D
e
s
i
g
n
(a
c
)
(
a
c
)
(
a
c
)
(
a
c
)
(
a
c
)
(
a
c
)
(
a
c
)
(
f
t
)
(
f
t
)
(
f
t
)
32
0
1
46
0
+
6
8
/
4
6
1
+
6
7
-
L
2
L
T
-
46
2
+
5
2
/
4
6
2
+
8
1
-
L
2
L
T
-
30
"
R
C
P
/
2
@
4
2
"
R
C
P
0.
0
4
2
2
4
32
0
2
46
9
+
7
5
/
4
7
0
+
5
8
-
L
2
L
T
-
54
"
R
C
P
0.
0
5
<0
.
0
1
73
33
0
1
4
8
5
+
6
0
/
4
8
5
+
7
0
-
L
2
L
T
-
48
"
R
C
P
<0
.
0
1
<
0
.
0
1
1
0
2
8
37
0
1
53
9
+
4
9
/
5
3
9
+
9
0
-
L
3
-
48
"
R
C
P
0.
0
3
2
4
0
37
0
1
53
9
+
4
9
/
5
3
9
+
9
0
-
L
3
-
BA
N
K
S
T
A
B
I
L
I
Z
A
T
I
O
N
<0
.
0
1
10
37
0
2
55
0
+
8
7
/
5
5
1
+
0
1
-
L
3
-
55
2
+
0
3
/
5
5
2
+
2
4
-
L
3
-
24
"
R
C
P
/
C
M
P
<0
.
0
1
6
0
37
0
2
55
0
+
8
7
/
5
5
1
+
0
1
-
L
3
-
BA
N
K
S
T
A
B
I
L
I
Z
A
T
I
O
N
<0
.
0
1
10
38
0
1
56
1
+
1
0
/
5
6
1
+
3
0
-
L
3
-
56
3
+
9
4
/
5
6
4
+
0
9
-
L
3
-
48
"
/
4
2
"
C
M
P
<0
.
0
1
7
0
38
0
1
56
1
+
1
0
/
5
6
1
+
3
0
-
L
3
-
BA
N
K
S
T
A
B
I
L
I
Z
A
T
I
O
N
<0
.
0
1
5
38
0
2
57
7
+
4
4
/
5
7
7
+
8
1
-
L
3
-
TW
O
3
0
"
C
M
P
<0
.
0
1
2
2
39
0
1
58
9
+
2
5
/
5
8
9
+
5
0
-
L
3
-
48
"
C
M
P
<0
.
0
1
4
0
40
0
1
59
9
+
4
1
/
5
9
9
+
4
7
-
L
3
-
59
9
+
3
6
/
5
9
9
+
4
6
-
L
3
-
54
"
C
M
P
<0
.
0
1
5
6
40
0
1
59
9
+
4
1
/
5
9
9
+
4
7
-
L
3
-
BA
N
K
S
T
A
B
I
L
I
Z
A
T
I
O
N
<0
.
0
1
10
TO
T
A
L
S
:
0.
0
5
<
0
.
0
1
0
.
0
9
4
5
8
1
3
AT
N
R
e
v
i
s
e
d
3
/
3
1
/
0
5
SH
E
E
T
1
o
f
1
12/6/2013
DI
V
I
S
I
O
N
O
F
H
I
G
H
W
A
Y
S
WAKE COUNTY
WB
S
-
4
6
2
6
5
.
3
.
1
(
I
-
5
3
3
8
/
I
-
5
3
1
1
)
W
E
T
L
A
N
D
P
E
R
M
I
T
I
M
P
A
C
T
S
U
M
M
A
R
Y
WE
T
L
A
N
D
I
M
P
A
C
T
S
SU
R
F
A
C
E
W
A
T
E
R
I
M
P
A
C
T
S
NC
D
E
P
A
R
T
M
E
N
T
O
F
T
R
A
N
S
P
O
R
T
A
T
I
O
N
Copyright (C) 2009 MyTopo
07
8
°
4
4
'
0
0
.
0
0
"
W
07
8
°
4
4
'
0
0
.
0
0
"
W
07
8
°
4
0
'
0
0
.
0
0
"
W
07
8
°
4
0
'
0
0
.
0
0
"
W
078° 36' 00.00" W 078° 36' 00.00" W
035°49'00.00"N
035°49'00.00"N
035°48'00.00"N
035°48'00.00"N
035°47'00.00"N
035°47'00.00"N
035°46'00.00"N
035°46'00.00"N
035°45'00.00"N
035°45'00.00"N
00.00"N
00.00"N
SC
A
L
E
1
:
5
0
0
0
0
0
10
0
0
0
20
0
0
0
30
0
0
0
FE
E
T
NS
BE
G
I
N
A
R
E
A
3
44
4
+
0
0
-
L
1
-
END AREA 3 628+60 -L3-
RO
A
D
CR
O
S
S
I
N
G
B
R
I
D
G
E
PA
R
A
L
L
E
L
IM
P
A
C
T
ZO
N
E
1
(f
t
2)
ZO
N
E
2
(f
t
2)
TO
T
A
L
(f
t
2)
ZO
N
E
1
(f
t
2)
ZONE 2 (ft2)TOTAL (ft2)ZONE 1 (ft2)ZONE 2 (ft2)
32
0
1
R
O
A
D
W
A
Y
46
0
+
2
6
t
o
4
6
2
+
9
6
-
L
2
L
T
-
74
9
0
2
3
2
4
9
8
1
4
32
0
1
R
O
A
D
W
A
Y
45
7
+
5
0
t
o
4
5
8
+
2
9
-
L
2
R
T
-
X
0
1
0
1
9
*
1
0
1
9
*
32
0
2
R
O
A
D
W
A
Y
46
9
+
4
2
t
o
4
7
0
+
8
8
-
L
2
L
T
-
33
2
1
2
5
6
6
5
8
8
7
33
0
1
R
O
A
D
W
A
Y
48
4
+
8
0
t
o
4
8
5
+
9
4
-
L
2
L
T
-
42
3
2
3
9
9
1
8
2
2
3
36
0
1
R
O
A
D
W
A
Y
52
5
+
8
7
t
o
5
2
7
+
4
5
-
L
3
-
X
28
4
8
2
0
1
4
4
8
6
2
36
0
2
R
O
A
D
W
A
Y
52
7
+
9
9
t
o
5
3
0
+
9
1
-
L
3
-
X
0
2
5
7
4
2
5
7
4
37
0
1
R
O
A
D
W
A
Y
53
9
+
6
6
t
o
5
4
0
+
4
3
-
L
3
-
85
9
9
1
1
8
8
9
7
8
7
37
0
2
R
O
A
D
W
A
Y
55
0
+
7
7
t
o
5
5
2
+
4
0
-
L
3
-
30
0
1
4
2
9
3
4
3
0
38
0
1
R
O
A
D
W
A
Y
13
+
8
2
t
o
1
4
+
9
3
-
R
P
1
5
B
-
18
+
9
2
t
o
1
9
+
5
0
-
R
P
1
5
C
-
60
6
6
3
1
8
6
9
2
5
2
38
0
2
R
O
A
D
W
A
Y
18
+
8
0
t
o
1
7
+
8
1
-
R
P
1
5
A
-
33
5
6
2
0
7
8
5
4
3
4
39
0
1
R
O
A
D
W
A
Y
58
9
+
3
1
t
o
5
9
0
+
1
0
-
L
3
-
78
2
5
6
0
1
3
4
2
40
0
1
R
O
A
D
W
A
Y
59
9
+
0
3
t
o
5
9
9
+
5
8
-
L
3
-
13
+
6
1
t
o
1
4
+
6
0
-
R
P
1
6
B
-
55
2
5
2
8
9
7
8
4
2
2
41
0
1
R
O
A
D
W
A
Y
62
2
+
1
8
t
o
6
2
2
+
6
9
-
L
3
-
X
60
6
9
8
7
0
4
TO
T
A
L
:
45
8
2
6
2
1
3
3
1
6
7
1
5
7
0
2
5
7
4
2
5
7
4
*I
m
p
a
c
t
s
s
h
o
w
n
w
e
r
e
p
r
e
v
i
o
u
s
l
y
p
e
r
m
i
t
t
e
d
o
n
M
O
T
(
M
a
i
n
t
e
n
a
n
c
e
o
f
T
r
a
f
f
i
c
)
B
u
f
f
e
r
P
e
r
m
i
t
an
d
a
r
e
n
o
t
i
n
c
l
u
d
e
d
i
n
t
h
e
t
o
t
a
l
i
m
p
a
c
t
s
f
o
r
A
r
e
a
3
SHEET 1 OF 1PROJECT: 46265.3.1 (I5338/I5311)12/6/2013N.C. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS WAKE COUNTY
IM
P
A
C
T
BU
F
F
E
R
I
M
P
A
C
T
S
S
U
M
M
A
R
Y
TY
P
E
SI
T
E
N
O
.
ST
R
U
C
T
U
R
E
S
I
Z
E
/
TY
P
E
ST
A
T
I
O
N
(F
R
O
M
/
T
O
)
AL
L
O
W
A
B
L
E
MITIGABLEBUFFERREPLACEMENT
PR
O
T
E
C
T
I
O
N
O
F
E
X
I
S
T
I
N
G
S
T
R
U
C
T
U
R
E
PR
O
T
E
C
T
I
O
N
O
F
E
X
I
S
T
I
N
G
S
T
R
U
C
T
U
R
E
PR
O
T
E
C
T
I
O
N
O
F
E
X
I
S
T
I
N
G
S
T
R
U
C
T
U
R
E
PR
O
T
E
C
T
I
O
N
O
F
E
X
I
S
T
I
N
G
S
T
R
U
C
T
U
R
E
PR
O
T
E
C
T
I
O
N
O
F
E
X
I
S
T
I
N
G
S
T
R
U
C
T
U
R
E
PR
O
T
E
C
T
I
O
N
O
F
E
X
I
S
T
I
N
G
S
T
R
U
C
T
U
R
E
PR
O
T
E
C
T
I
O
N
O
F
E
X
I
S
T
I
N
G
S
T
R
U
C
T
U
R
E
PR
O
T
E
C
T
I
O
N
O
F
E
X
I
S
T
I
N
G
S
T
R
U
C
T
U
R
E
PR
O
T
E
C
T
I
O
N
O
F
E
X
I
S
T
I
N
G
S
T
R
U
C
T
U
R
E
Rev. May 2006
ZO
N
E
1
(f
t
2)
ZO
N
E
2
(f
t
2)
32
0
2
46
9
+
7
5
/
4
7
0
+
5
7
-
L
2
L
T
-
17
8
0
28
TO
T
A
L
:
17
8
0
28
WE
T
L
A
N
D
S
I
N
B
U
F
F
E
R
I
M
P
A
C
T
S
S
U
M
M
A
R
Y
SHEET 1 OF 1WBS - 46265.3.1 (I-5338/I-5311)11/14/2013N.C. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS WAKE COUNTY
WE
T
L
A
N
D
S
I
N
BU
F
F
E
R
S
SI
T
E
N
O
.
ST
A
T
I
O
N
(F
R
O
M
/
T
O
)
Rev. Jan 2009