20131275 Ver 1_401 Application_20131213

20131275
ECS CAROLINAS, LLP "Setting the Standard for Service"
®w Geotechnical • Construction Materials • Environmental • Facilities NC Registered Engineering Firm F -1078
December 9, 2013
Ms. Karen Higgins
NC DWR, 401/Wetlands Unit
512 North Salisbury Street, Archdale Building — 9T" Floor
Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Subject: Pre - Construction Notification Application
Courtesy Copy NWP 12
St. Matthew Catholic Church Sewer Line
Waxhaw, Union County, North Carolina
ECS Project 09 -23568
Dear Ms. Higgins:
Please find the attached Courtesy Copy of the Pre - Construction Notification Application for the
above referenced project. The site is an approximate 22 acre portion of a larger tract that was
delineated by ECS in December 2012. The purpose of the project is to construct an
approximate 16,000 square foot building, utilized as a church sanctuary and classrooms,
parking areas and the installation of associated utilities..
On behalf of the Catholic Diocese of Charlotte, I am providing a Courtesy Copy of the NWP 12
to authorize the temporary impact to 15 linear feet of stream channel. It is our understanding
that written authorization of the 401 Water Quality Certification is not required. The stormwater
management plan has been approved by the NCDENR. Proof of the approval is included as an
attachment to the application.
Please feel free to contact me at (336) 856 -7150 if you have any questions concerning this
project or if additional information is required. Thank you in advance for your timely
consideration of this matter.
Sincerely,
ECS Carolinas, LLP
Bradley S. Luckey Michael T. Brame, PWS
Environmental Project Manager Environmental Principal
Attachment: Pre - Construction Notification Application
cc: Mr. Allan Johnson — NC DWR /401 Wetlands Unit - Mooresville Regional Office (via email)
C k 203
4811 Koger Blvd., Greensboro, NC 27407 • T: 336 - 856 -7150 • F: 336- 856 -71
ECS Capitol Services, PLLC • ECS Carolinas, LLP • ECS Central, PLLC • ECS Florida, LLC • ECS Mid - Atlantic, LLC • ECS Midwest, LLC • ECS Swtheast I. LC • ECS Texas, LLP

aoF w a rFROG
1 � ®� 1 O o T
Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.3 Dec 10 2008
9L95 k_L5Y vL9
LN"R. 203
Page 1 of 13 eBerR. yTM
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December
Pre - Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A. Applicant information
1.
Processing
1 a.
Type(s) of approval sought from the
Corps:
®Section 404 Permit E] Section 10 Permit
1b.
Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: NWP 12 or General Permit (GP) number:
1c.
Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
® Yes
❑ No
1d.
Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non -404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization
1 e.
Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWO 401
Certification:
® Yes ❑ No
, For the record only for Corps Permit:
❑ Yes No
1f.
Is payment into a mitigation bank or in4eu fee program proposed for mitigation
of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in -lieu
fee program.
❑ Yes
® No
1 g.
Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h
below.
❑ Yes
® No
1 h.
2.
Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)? ❑ Yes
Project Information ---------------- _------------ - - - - -- ---------------
® No
.�� - - --
2a.
Name of project:
St. Matthew Catholic Church Sewer Line
2b.
County:
Union
2c.
Nearest municipality / town.
Waxhaw
2d.
Subdivision name:
2e.
NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state
project no:
3.
Owner Information
3a.
Name(s) on Recorded Deed:
Jugis Peter J Bishop of the Roman and Catholic Doicese of Charlotte
NC
3b.
Deed Book and Page No.
5948 -731
3c.
Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable):
Mr. Peter J. Jugis
3d.
Street address:
1123 South Church Street
3e.
City, state, zip:
Charlotte, NC 28203
3f.
Telephone no.:
704 - 370 -6299
3g.
Fax no.:
3h.
Email address:
[e-mail]
9L95 k_L5Y vL9
LN"R. 203
Page 1 of 13 eBerR. yTM
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December

4.
Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a
Applicant is
❑ Agent ❑ Other, specify
4b
Name
4c
Business name
(if applicable)
4d
Street address
4e
City, state, zip
4f
Telephone no
4g
Fax no
4h
Email address
5
Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a
Name
Bradley S Luckey
5b
Business name
(if applicable)
ECS Carolinas, LLP
5c
Street address
4811 Koger Boulevard
5d
City, state, zip
Greensboro, NC 27407
5e
Telephone no
(336) 856 -7150
5f
Fax no
(336) 856 -7160
5g
Email address
bluckey @ecslimited com
Page 2 of 13
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10, 2008 Version

i
B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1 Property Identification
1a Property identification no (tax PIN or parcel ID)
06192003C
Latitude 3d 948d009 Longitude -
1 b Site coordinates (in decimal degrees)
80 773591
(DD DDDDDD) ( -DD DDDDDD)
1c Property size
33 7 acres
2 Surface Waters
2a Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc ) to
Twelvemile Creek
proposed project
2b Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water
C
2c River basin
Catawba
3. Project Description
3a Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application
The site is an approximate 22 acre portion of a larger tract that was delineated by ECS in December 2012 The site
contains wooded land and fields Surrounding properties contain Waxhaw -Marvin Road, single /multi family residences,
wooded land and fields
3b List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property
0 10 acres
3c List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property
1,000 feet
3d Explain the purpose of the proposed project
The purpose of the proposed project is to develop the site with an approximate 16,000 square foot sanctuary and
classroom budding, parking areas and assoicated utilities
3e Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used
i The overall project is to construct an approximate 16,000 square foot building, utdizea as a church sanctuary and
classrooms, parking areas and the installation of assoicated utilities The installation of municipal sewer lines to connect
to the proposed budding will be required An 8 inch DIP sewer line will be buried approximately 18 inches below the
native elevation of a stream bed and temporarily impact 15 linear feet of stream channel Other stream segments and /or
wetlands will not be impacted by the development of the site The temporary impacts to the stream channel, as a result
of the installation of the proposed sewer line, will be restored to similair pre - construction conditions
It will be necessary to clear and grade in the vicinity of the stream crossing Graders, haulers, excavators and cranes will
be used during the clearing /grading and construction activities on the site
4 Jurisdictional Determinations
4a Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
® Yes ❑ No El Unknown
project (including all prior phases) in the past?
Comments Steve Kichefski
4b If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
❑ Preliminary ❑ Final
of determination was made?
4c If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Agency /Consultant Company ECS Carolinas, LLP
Name (if known) David Valentine /Denise Neas
Other
4d If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation
Page 3 of 13
PCN Form —Version 1 3 December 10, 2008 Version

S. Project History
5a Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
this project (including all prior phases) in the past'?
❑ Yes ® No ❑ Unknown
5b If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions
6 Future Project Plans
6a Is this a phased project?
❑ Yes ® No
6b If yes, explain
Additional stream/wetland impacts are not being proposed
Page 4 of 13
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10, 2008 Version

C Proposed Impacts Inventory
1 Impacts Summary
la Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply)
❑ Wetlands ® Streams - tributaries ❑ Buffers
❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2 Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted
2a
2b
2c
2d
2e
2f
Wetland impact
Type of jurisdiction
number —
Type of impact
Type of wetland
Forested
(Corps - 404, 10
Area of impact
Permanent (P) or
(if known)
DWQ — non -404, other)
(acres)
Temporary T
W1 ❑ P [--IT
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W2 [:]PMT
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W3 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W4 [:]PMT
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W5 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ Dk -'VQ
W6 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
2g. Total wetland impacts
2h Comments Wetland impacts are not proposed
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted
3a
3b
3c
3d
3e
3f
3g
Stream impact
Type of impact
Stream name
Perennial
Type of jurisdiction
Average
Impact
number -
(PER) or
(Corps - 404, 10
stream
length
Permanent (P) or
intermittent
DWQ — non -404,
width
(linear
Temporary (T)
(INT)?
other)
(feet)
feet)
S1 [:]POT
Excavation
Unnamed
® PER
❑ INT
® Corps
❑ DWQ
4
15
S2 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S3 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S4 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S5 ❑ P FIT
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S6 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
3h Total stream and tributary impacts
15
31 Comments A total of 15 linear feet of stream channel will be temporarily impacted by the excavation assoicated with the
installation of the proposed sewer line The temporarily impacted stream channel will be restored to similair pre - construction
conditions Mitigation should not be required due to the stream impacts being temporary and less than 150 linear feet
Page 5 of 13
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10, 2008 Version

4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U S then individually list all open water impacts below
4a
4b
4c
4d
4e
Open water
Name of waterbody
impact number—
(if applicable)
Type of impact
Waterbody type
Area of impact (acres)
Permanent (P) or
Temporary
01 []PMT
02 ❑P ❑T
03 ❑P ❑T
04 ❑P ❑T
4E Total open water impacts
4g Comments Open water impacts are not proposed
5 Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, then complete the chart below
5a
5b
5c
5d
5e
Wetland Impacts (acres)
Stream Impacts (feet)
Upland
Pond ID
Proposed use or purpose
(acres)
number
of pond
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
P1
Stormwater
058
P2
5f. Total
5g Comments The stormwater pond has been designed to treat at least 85% TSS The stormwater management plan has
been submitted to NCDENR separate of this application Prccf of Approval of the stormwater management plan is included as
an attachment
5h Is a dam high hazard permit required
❑ Yes ®No If yes, permit ID no
51 Expected pond surface area (acres)
058
5j Size of pond watershed (acres)
12
5k Method of construction
Excavated in high ground
Page 6 of 13
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10, 2008 Version

6 Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form
6a
❑ Neuse ❑ Tar - Pamlico ❑ Other
Project is in which protected basing
® Catawba ❑ Randleman
6b
6c
6d
6e
6f
6g
Buffer impact
number —
Reason
Buffer
Zone 1 impact
Zone 2 impact
Permanent (P) or
for
Stream name
mitigation
(square feet)
(square feet)
Temporary
impact
required
61 ❑P ❑T
El Yes
❑ No
B2 ❑P
El Yes
❑ No
B3 ❑P
❑Yes
❑ No
6h Total buffer impacts
61 Comments Protected riparian buffers will not be impacted by the proposed project The site is located in the Catawba
River Basin However, the stream that is being proposed to be temporarily impacted is not subject to the Catawba River Basin
Riparian Buffer Rules
D Impact Justification and Mitigation
1 Avoidance and Minimization
1a Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project
The approximate 16,000 square foot budding and assoicated parking areas have been designed to avoid impacts to the
jurisdictional pond, streams or wetlands The sewer line has been designed to avoid permanent impacts to streams
Additionally, the sewer line crossing has been designed to cross the stream in a relatively straight portion of the stream as
near to perpendici dar as possible given topographic and construction constraints_
The sewer line crossing has been designed so that excavated sods will be stockpiled in upland areas and used to backfill the
trench /line to a depth of approximately 18 inches below the native stream bed The elevation of the stream channel will be
returned to its natural elevation Rip -rap will not be placed above the normal high water mark Stabilization measures above
the normal high water mark will consist of approvea matting and /or vegetative cover (live stakes) Stream Impact Exhibit D,
prepared by Land Design, shows the stream bank restoration detail
Approximately 0 10 acres of wetland, approximately 1,000 linear feet of stream channel and an approximate 0 50 acre
jurisdictional pond exist on the site Impacts to the pond and wetlands have been avoided The remaining 985 feet of stream
channel will not be impacted by the proposed development Permanent impacts to the 1,000 linear feet of stream channel
have been avoided
lb Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques
The clearing limits will be staked and silt fence will be used The sewer line crossing will stockpile excavated sods in upland
areas and use native material to backfill the trench /line to a depth of approximately 18 inches below the native stream bed
The elevation of the stream channel will be returned to its natural elevation Rip -rap will not be placed above the normal high
water mark Stabilization measures above the normal high water mark will consist of approved matting and /or vegetative cover
(live stakes) Stream Impact Exhibit D, prepared by Land Design, shows the stream bank restoration detail
A temporary coffer dam will be installed upgradient of the proposed stream crossing The temporary coffer dam will be
constructed using sandbag dikes During construction, water will be pumped around the construction area into sediment traps
(or sediment bags) prior to being discharged downgradient of the construction area Upon completion of the sewer line
installation, the temporary coffer dams will be removed The proposed length of temporary stream impact accounts for the foot
print of the temporary coffer dam /sandbag dikes
Page 7 of 13
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10, 2008 Version

2 Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U S or Waters of the State
2a Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
impacts to Waters of the U S or Waters of the State?
❑ Yes ® No
2b If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply)
❑ DWQ ❑ Corps
2c If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
project?
❑ Mitigation bank
❑ Payment to in -lieu fee program
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a Name of Mitigation Bank
3b Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
Type
Quantity
3c Comments
4 Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached
❑ Yes
4b Stream mitigation requested
linear feet
4c If using stream mitigation, stream temperature
❑ warm ❑ cool ❑cold
4d Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only)
square feet
4e Riparian wetland mitigation requested
acres
4f Non - riparian wetland mitigation requested
acres
4g Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested
acres
4h Comments
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan
6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
buffer mitigation?
❑ Yes ® No
6b If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation Calculate the
amount of mitigation required
Zone
6c
Reason for impact
6d
Total impact
(square feet)
Multiplier
6e
Required mitigation
(square feet)
Zone 1
3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2
1 5
6f Total buffer mitigation required"
6g If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e g , payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund)
Page 8 of 13
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10, 2008 Version

6h Comments
Page 9 of 13
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10, 2008 Version

E
Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1
Diffuse Flow Plan
la
Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified
❑ Yes ® No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
lb
If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why
Comments Protected riparian buffers will not be impacted by the proposed project
The site is located in the Catawba River Basin However, the stream that is being
❑ Yes ® No
proposed to be temporarily impacted is not subject to the Catawba River Basin
Riparian Buffer Rules Additionally, stormwater run -off will be discharged directly
into a stormwater retention pond
2.
Stormwater Management Plan
2a
What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project?
13%
2b
Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan?
® Yes ❑ No
2c
If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why
2d
If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative
description of the plan
A 0 58 acre stormwater pond has been designed to treat stormwater runoff The stormwater pond has been designed to
treat at least 85% total suspended solids The stormwater pond has been designed to treat stormwater based on the site
being 13% impervious The stormwater plan has been submitted and approved by NCDENR separate of this application
(attached)
❑ Certified Local Government
2e
Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
❑ DWQ Stormwater Program
❑ DWQ 401 Unit
3.
Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a
In which local government's jurisdiction is this project?
❑ Phase II
❑ NSW
3b
Which of the following locally- implemented stormwater management programs
❑ USMP
apply (check all that apply)
❑ Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other
3c Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ❑ No
attached?
4
DWQ Stormwater Program Review
❑ Coastal counties
❑ HQW
4a
Which of the following state - implemented stormwater management programs apply
❑ ORW
(check all that apply)
® Session Law 2006 -246
I
❑ Other
4b
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
® Yes ❑ No
attached?
5.
DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
Page 10 of 13
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10, 2008 Version

5a Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
® Yes ❑ No
5b Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
® Yes ❑ No
F Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
la Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal /state /local) funds or the
❑ Yes ® No
use of public (federal /state) land?
lb If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State
❑ Yes ® No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)7
1 c If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
❑ Yes ® No
letter )
Comments A NEPA or SEPA is not required as part of this project
2. Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H 0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H 1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards,
❑ Yes ® No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B 0200)
2b Is this an after - the -fact permit application?
❑ Yes ® No
2c If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s)
3 Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
❑ Yes ® No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description
We are not aware of additional development that will result which will impact nearby downstream water quality
4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non - discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility
Wastewater from the proposed building will be disposed of by municipal sewer service provided by the City /County
Utilities Commission No stream or wetland impacts, outside of what is proposed in this permit application, will occur that are
associated with sewage disposal and /or installation of sewage lines
Page 11 of 13
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10, 2008 Version

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
❑ Yes ® No
habitat'?
5b Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
❑ Yes ® No
impacts?
E:] Raleigh
5c If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted
❑ Asheville
5d What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
ECS consulted the Natural Heritage Program Website to determine if federally protected endangered or threatened
species inhabit the Catawba, NC Quadrangle (the quadrangle that contains the site) Schweinitz's sunflower and
Michaux's sumac are identified as federally listed endangered species on the site quadrangle However, limited habitat for
these species exists on the site due to agricultural practices, use of herbicides, tillage, etc associated with the use of the
site for agricultural activities Potential habitat, specifically along roadsides, will not be altered or will still be present
following development of the site
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a Will this protect occur in or rear an area designated as essential fish habitat?
❑ Yes No
6b What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
Based on our knowledge of the site, the site is not located in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat We did
not observe fish inhabiting the stream during our site visits Best management practices and the construction of stormwater
ponds will prevent sediment from entering down gradient waterbodies which may contain fish
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
❑ Yes No
status (e g , National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
We reviewed the SHPO Map (http / /gis ncdcr gov /hpoweb /) to identify historic and /or archaeological resources of the site
The SHPO map did not identify historic and /or cultural resources on the site or in the vicinity of the site A copy of the map
is included as an attachment
8 Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a Will this project occur in a FEMA - designated 100 -year floodplain?
❑ Yes ® No
8b If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements
8c What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? FEMA FIRM Panel 4464J (attached)
Bradley S Luckey
12/9/13
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name
Date
Appli nt/Agent's Signature
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant
Page 12 of 13
PCN Form —Version 1 3 December 10, 2008 Version

is provided
Page 13 of 13
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10, 2008 Version

---------- `� - • -ice
Ax
r T _� � ` G,y , I 1 ! 11 / / / r' ' �' `� Q - , \ r'ii '\ \ \ \ \ 1 1 1 I \ l 1 1 CCC "'000"""111WWW.. / / ♦ ' � � �
IIllfll,ll, r / rte- . , ` /ri )♦ 1 \ 1 l , \ 1
l � m,♦ �` fir,// /// /, / 1 / "Q`.�� � \ \\ .. \ _ V`
p �
♦ ♦`\ \\\\ , 111, / y \' �! . � ♦ \ ♦ ♦ \\\_ ♦ ♦\ � ♦ \ \\ \ \I \ \ � 1
'` __ \ \\ \I \I \ �� � � 11 r , \`\ ``\ \\ \\ \`♦ `� J` ♦\r I` t\ � II \I 1 1 11 � 1
..' r' - 'tI__Q v. ♦1) F \ 1 1 1 / f / 1 y54 `` \ ♦ �- �- = _-w'` ,\" \ \ 1 1 \ \ 1 1 1 \, '1
' �_ ---
`` '' ♦ ` ♦� \ � \ \ \\ H 1 ,' `� ♦` ♦` `�'` `♦` /ter' __ -_ ;; ```` -^ - - � 1 \ 1 \; `� ` � '�� `
- ` ♦`\ 1 \`�♦�`� ,. ♦♦ 555 1 ;
/it I I / / / 6 r / `. ♦ ♦ ♦ `� i ! / '��``.- ! `�-. �.`
` ` -`\♦ \` \ �♦4MY-, . `♦ \ / `/ /f / II I 1 � I \` ��� - - - -- �'Ir'i,r /' - � ♦ �`l♦ 1` ♦fya'.,i�� /�`
'it
`s
If
it
�'• -_ .. � /,'rte -____ _�'I ,'- _ ,r YT /\,a \\ \` ` ♦♦ �1. - _ _ - -_ -__ - -- - �lJ - -.,'�`
r
` r' � r ! ♦ \\ `\ `\ \\ 1 j 1 1 � 1 1 /' /, /' '' / - -_- _ ice, �♦ ` ♦ �,
♦p \
O_
oar , �� ��C,'�• ref �.' �.��I (�
0
L8Y1CiDPS1�T1. ST. MATTHEW CATHOLIC CHURCH
STREAM IMPACT EXHIBIT A
11- 26- 2013J.D01012203
CORPORATE -
��'. SEAL

II 1 (EXIST. WOODS
II III i / 'STREAM
AM I
AI I
SS ,
l
NOTE: I
PROVIDE A 15' PERMANENT
N J MAINTENANCE EASEMENT
FOR PROPOSED SANITARY
SEWER EXTENSION
s
DENUDED LIMITS (TYP) i
(11.9 ACRES) I
PROP. TREE LINE I
15 LF t OF TEMPORARY
,STREAM IMPACT ` EXIST. WOODS \
FOR SEWER CONSTRUCTION
PLAN VIEW: PROPOSED STREAM IMPACTS
f
NOTE:
RESTORE STREAM CHANNEL TO
10' 0' 10' 20' 40'
ORIGINAL SHAPE, LINE BANKS WITH
NORTH AMERICAN GREEN C350 MATT SCALE: I" = 20�
N /
- w -
=v
U
=m
U
U_~
m
J =
O X
= w
Q U
U�
w w
F-
U)
Q
C%)

560
555
550
FE
540
i
535
530
525
52C
51 I
510
NOTE:
RESTORE STREAM CHANNEL TO
ORIGINAL SHAPE, LINE BANKS WITH
NORTH AMERICAN GREEN C350 MATT
560
555
550
545
540
535
530
525
STREAM
520
515
510
0 +50 1+00
PROFILE VIEW: PROPOSED STREAM IMPACTS
LandDesi&m. ST. MATTHEW CATHOLIC CHURCH
STREAM IMPACT EXHIBIT C
SCALE:
HORZ.: 1"=40'
VERT - 1 " =4'
/ 11 - 26- 2v1311ri/7 U�Z[vi
1UUrrrUb
1�p 1111111pb
CORPORATE
S
SEAL
If
tl
li
mom
No
SOME
mom
mor.11ME1111111111111
Mr
M1
SEE
I
FA
i
�I
m
M1
m
ME
M
oil
mill
ME
Room
ME
ME
560
555
550
545
540
535
530
525
STREAM
520
515
510
0 +50 1+00
PROFILE VIEW: PROPOSED STREAM IMPACTS
LandDesi&m. ST. MATTHEW CATHOLIC CHURCH
STREAM IMPACT EXHIBIT C
SCALE:
HORZ.: 1"=40'
VERT - 1 " =4'
/ 11 - 26- 2v1311ri/7 U�Z[vi
1UUrrrUb
1�p 1111111pb
CORPORATE
S
SEAL
If
tl

PLAN VIEW
PLAN VIEW
straw bate dike or berm
- I I I - 1 1.5 It
aPINOVOKi
._
6-ft (1.8 -m) J 0.45 m)
dewatering deAce
0
minimum --
\ _%trearn
� IIIlnnnnnl "`�``�� M
diversion oumps
gluruuullll
/
6-ft (1 8_01)
L - discharge hoses �� -
minimum
- - j P':
dewaterinr pump /
-. _('P
It A-
• 3 R
4: \
W-, A
flow �
� 1. 110w
intake hosca
stone outlet
n water dike __
sediment dike Al i v clear) sumr note
structure
- - -- -t r —. ar f>
TI
SECON A -A
(12° t 18' �3eep
5 it
work area - -- , 2' 61.)
(0.45 m) '
pumps should discharge If'-wh rxA lu exceed
onto a stable Velocity okdwtuch wtu can
in
ab dissipator made of rip rap
or sandbags
tlow
r4to6-4nQ0110
nc
SECI10N A -A
.impervious sheehrK3
15 Cry]) riprap
base I low 4 1 lc A
work area 3 (2 toot minbrium)
rebar or sta cs 'o
straw bates
cr(m section of sandbnp &a
PUMP AROUND DETAIL
;'�
NOTES
_
i PUMP AROUND DIKES SHALL NOT BE SET OUTSIDE OF THE DISTURESEDAMPACT
I_IMII S SHOWN ON THE PLANS
2 INSTALL PUMP-AROUND DVERSSON AND DEWATER THE CONSTRUCTION ZONE
THROUGH THE DEWATFRING DEVICE. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL STAGE. T HE LIMPS OF
THE PUMP- AROUND FLOW DIVERSION TO OEWATER ONLY TI IAT SECTION SCHEDULED
FOR THAT DAY'S WORK AT THE END OF EACH WORK DAY, I HE WORK AREA SHALL BE
DEVJAT`RiNG BASIN DETAIL
STABII 17-ED THE PUMP AROUND PRACTICE REMOVED), AND THE FLOW RESTORED TO
THE CHANNEL. WORK SHALL BE COMPLETED ONLY DURING FORECAST PERIODS Or
EROSION CONTROL
RUTTING
(SEE CETASW
TOE OF SLOPE
Section View
LIVE STAIM OYPI . 70POP BA NL
e/. 5 u o
d
`TOE OF SLOPE
Plan View
LIVE STAKE RESTORATION DETAIL
,1111111111111/IIIIII
r
._
0
� IIIlnnnnnl "`�``�� M
gluruuullll
4: \
n
2
U
OC
2
U
U_ 1=
W
OX
W
Q Q
U °-
W Q
2 w
ry
V)
Q
2
VJ
Z

HPOV EB: NCHPO GIS Service
Page 1 of 1
`Q -
�'
ON MTWwWthrTiyl.W,
A
- "ho -
4 4
Q
81itl ?a� o�ipl�40Ln �acDiA¢ Breach i
a
C Qw�
b
➢ , +' o� �� UNION - -
Pq ' b 84 t
i
d 8M 40
0
u`
Q ➢ 7
D
t
1Y� �'i dpyS'
Rr
!r r
Lttihie.3llf1511 lniblerNJ1NIF2 Sure ! A11L!
http: / /gis.ncdcr.gov/hpoweb/
12/4/2013

A74LA.
RCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Energy, Mineral, and Land Resources
Tracy E Davis, PE, CPM Pat McCrory, Governor
Director John E Skvarla, III, Secretary
October 25, 2013
Bishop Peter J. Jugis
St Matthew Catholic Church
1123 S. Church Street
Charlotte, North Carolina 28203
Subject: Stormwater Permit COC No. SWG06005
St. Matthew Catholic Church - Phase 1
General Permit - Low Density Development
Union County
Dear Bishop Jugis.
On October 11, 2013 the Division of Energy, Mineral, and Land Resources (DEMLR) received your
application for a Low Density Fast Track project to be covered under the State Stormwater General
Permit Number SWG060000. In accordance with your application request we are forwarding
herewith the subject Certificate of Coverage Number SWG06 0005, along with a copy of the General
Permit, for the construction of built -upon area associated with this low density project The
General Permit is issued pursuant to the requirements of North Carolina General Statute 143 - 215.1,
Title 15A NCAC 21-1.1000, SL 2008 -211, and SL 2006 -246, the stormwater management rules
Please pay particular attention to:
Enclosure 1: Permit condition Section B.1 requires the Permittee to notify the Division at
least forty -eight (48) hours in advance of commencing construction of the permitted
project.
Enclosure 2: Permit condition Section B.3 requires that a designer's certification and as-
built drawings for the project be submitted to the Division within 30 days of completion of
the permitted site grading, road construction, sidewalks, and stormwater conveyance
system, and prior to the sale of or construction on any lot.
Enclosure 3. Permit condition Section B 6 requires the Permittee to routinely update the
Master Plan of development and /or the submitted site plan by March 15C of each year,
beginning not later than one (1) year from the COC effective date, and ending when the
project is completely built per the approved plans The Permittee shall submit project BUA
status and all changes to the Division for review using the provided Annual Permittee
Certification Form.
Geological Survey Section - Land Quality Section
16121Mad Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699 - 1612.919- 707 -9200 / FAX 919 - 715 -8801
512 North Salisbury Street, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604 - Internet http #portal ncdenr orq /v.eb /lr/
An Equal Opportunity 1 Affirmative Action Employer - 50% Recycled 110% Post Consumer Paper

Permitting of this project does not constitute an acceptance of any part of the project that does not
meet the stormwater rules unless specifically mentioned herein. Division approval of this project is
based on acceptance of the certification provided by an appropriate North Carolina licensed
professional in the application. It shall be the Permittee's responsibility to ensure that the as-
constructed project meets the appropriate design criteria and rules. Failure to comply may result
in penalties in accordance with North Carolina General Statute §143- 215.6A through §143- 215.6C
and /or referral of the North Carolina licensed professional to the appropriate licensing board.
This permit shall be effective from the date of issuance until rescinded and shall be subject to the
conditions and limitations as specified therein, and does not supersede any other agency permit
that may be required. Please pay special attention to the conditions listed in this permit regarding
the Operation and Maintenance of the BMP(s), recordation of deed restrictions, procedures for
changes of ownership, and transferring the permit. Failure to establish an adequate system for
operation and maintenance of the stormwater management system, to record deed restrictions, and
to follow the procedures for transfer of the permit, will result in future compliance problems. This
cover letter shall be considered part of this permit and is therefore incorporated therein by
reference.
Please take notice that this Certificate of Coverage is not transferable except after notice to and
approval by the DEMLR. The DWQ may require modification or revocation and reissuance of the
Certificate of Coverage.
If you have any questions concerning this permit, or need additional information on this matter,
please contact Mike Randall at 919 - 807 -6374 or mike.randal]Pncdenr.gov.
Sincerely,
for Tracy E. Davis, PE, CPM, Director
cc: SWG060005 File, Mooresville Regional Office
ec: Fred Burrell, Project Manager
Kevin Vogel, LandDesign, Inc.
Ashley Landis, LandDesign, Inc.
Geological Survey Section • Land Quality Section
1612 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699 -1612 - 919 - 707 -92001 FAX: 919 - 715 -8801
512 North Salisbury Street, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604 - Internet: hlt�-./Iportal i cdenr.orglwebllr!
An Equal Opportunity 1 Affirmative Action Employer - 50% Recycled 110% Post Consumer Paper

ECS Carolinas, LLP
AGENT AUTHORIZATION
This form authorizes ECS to act as our agent in stream/wetland matters including U S Army
Corps of Engineers and North Carolina Division of Water Resources field verification and permit
application
Property Address 4116 Waxhaw- Marvin Rd
Waxhaw, NC 28173
Owner Information:
Name Peter J Jugis, Bishop of`the Roman Catholic, Diocese of
Charlotte, NC
Address 1123 S. Church Street
Charlotte, NC 28203
Telephone Number- 704 - 370 -6299
Fax Number,
E -mail Address chancery@charlottediocese org
t Qom•

, rr -
r� ,
+ SITE_
1`
Yi I H
I V
F•
�i'.'J
QL
� � I
i� e',. .. �. _ f_ • � w _: qty F'�_• -
9 •5501 ' _ _ f` - _
f n
1•t II ' _ It _ �1�
SOURCE: ✓lr'� FIGURE 1
►" SITE LOCATION MAP
USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP; ;
CATAWBA NE APPROXIMATE 33.7 ACRE TRACT
NORTH CAROLINA QUADRANGLE 4116 WAXHAW - MARVIN ROAD
DATED 1968 WAXHAW, NORTH CAROLINA
SCALE: 1 " 2,000' ECS PROJECT NO. 08 -8673

A
mss,
y
k
LEGEND !"
Approximate Site Boundary
Union County, North Carolina (NC179)
Map Unit Symbol Map Unit Name Acres In AOI
sac Badin channery silt loam. 8 to 15 percent 4.7
slopes
BdC2 Badin channery silty clay loam. 8 to 15 percent 2.8
slopes, moderately eroded
Tb82 Tarrus gravelly silty clay loam. 2 to 8 percent 25.4
slopes, moderately eroded
Totals for Area of Interest 33.0
N
SOURCE:
s
USDA SOIL SURVEY OF
MEAN URG COUNTY
FROM NRCS WEB SOIL SURVEY
NOT TO SCALE
Percent of AOI
14.3%
8.6%
77.1%
100.0%
FIGURE 2
SOIL MAP
APPROXIMATE 33.7 ACRE TRACT
4116 WAXHAW - MARVIN ROAD
WAXHAW, NORTH CAROLINA
ECS PROJECT NO. 08 -8673
s

THE STREAM, WETLAND AND POND LOCATIONS SHOWN ON THIS MAP ARE APPROXIMATE. THEY HAVE BEEN DELINEATED BY ECS. THEY
HAVE NOT BEEN VERIFIED BY THE U.S ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS OR THE NCDENR DWO.
THEY HAVE NOT BEEN SURVEYED.
LEGEND
zx
Approximate Location of Site Boundary
'..
Approximate Location of Perennial Stream
Approximate Location of Wetland
Approximate Location of Pond
®
Approximate Location of Data Point
Approximate Location of Stream Form
M
It!
SOURCE:
USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP
2010 AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH
FIELD NOTES PREPARED BY ECS
PERSONNEL
SCALE: 1" — 300'
S
• :.r
j FIGURE 4
APPROXIMATE STREAM/WETLAND /POND
LOCATION MAP
APPROXIMATE 33.7 ACRE TRACT
4116 WAXHAW - MARVIN ROAD
WAXHAW, NORTH CAROLINA
ECS PROJECT NO. 08 -8673
v
G
2
9
4
A

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont
1/n��
Project/Site i'1prIk y-ima'k 33 -i " City /County ��ni � VAIM Sampling Date U130 2
Applicant/Owner sw', olic. t L'.VCA. State rSG_ Sampling Point Dp- I
Investigator(s) � VAiC.' 1vt[. 5 Section Township, Range
Landform (hdlslope, terrace, etc) Local relief (concave, convex, none) C MVXY Slope
Subregion (LRR or MLRA) Lat Long Datum
Sod Map Unit Name & &:n c^.Ettir►Hent CIO!, W.►vt NWI classification
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes x No (If no, explain in Remarks )
Are Vegetation , Sod , or Hydrology significantly disturbed9 Are "Normal Circumstances" present2 Yes _X___ No
Are Vegetation , Sod , or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks )
2-
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No
nc Sod Present? X Is the Sampled Area
Hyd
Yes No within a Wetland? Yes No �
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No=
_i c afx v14 Pre,t-%t --rte 5cr"PL�v,) ?of-ti
I) 10CP --k4 t✓t Ctn land
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required, check all that apolv)
_ Surface Sod Cracks (66)
_ Surface Water (Al)
_ True Aquatic Plants (1314)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
_ High Water Table (A2)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
_ Drainage Patterns (1310)
_ Saturation (A3)
_ Oxidized Rhizosnheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Moss Trim Lines (616)
Water Marks (61)
!_
_ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry- Season Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (62)
_ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Sods (C6)
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Drift Deposits (133)
_ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Algal Mat or Crust (134)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
von Deposits (135)
_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
_ Water - Stained Leaves (139)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
_ Aquahc Fauna (B13)
_ FAC- Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations
Surface Water Present? Yes
No Depth (inches)
Water Table Present? Yee
No Depth (inches)
Saturation Present? Yes
No Depth (inches)
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aenal photos, previous inspections), if available
Remarks
VO"'14 ki"Lon
w(tuk.66 Wu)e no+ o65eeveo( .
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Interim Version

VEGETATION (Four Strata) — Use scientific names of plants.
Tree Stratum (Plot size
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Saplrno /Shrub Stratum (Plot size
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Sampling Point DP
Absolute Dominant Indicator
% Cover Species? Status
Dominance Test worksheet•
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC 100 (A/B)
4
5
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata
Tree — Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in (7 6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height
Sapling /Shrub — Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in DBH and greater than 3 28 ft (1 m) tall
Herb —All herbaceous (non - woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3 28 It tall
Woody vine — All woody vines greater than 3 28 it in
6
7
8
Prevalence Index worksheet.
Total % Cover of- MUMMY by
OBL species x 1 =
FACW species x2=
FAC species x3=
FACU species x4=
UPL species x5=
Column Totals (A) (B)
10
= Total Cover
12
= Total Cover
N 3 i = Total Cover
Herb Stratum (Plot size )
1
2
Prevalence Index = B/A = I
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators.
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
_ 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
_ 3 - Prevalence Index is 53 0'
_ 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
3
'Indicators of hydnc sod and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic
4
5
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata
Tree — Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in (7 6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height
Sapling /Shrub — Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in DBH and greater than 3 28 ft (1 m) tall
Herb —All herbaceous (non - woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3 28 It tall
Woody vine — All woody vines greater than 3 28 it in
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
= Total Cover
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size
1
2
3
4
5
6
= Total Cover
photo numbers here or on a separate sheet )
CA(,MtAA11+.
height
Hydrophytic
Vegetation �[
Present? Yes X No
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Interim Version

SOIL
Sampling Point
Profile Description (Describe to the depth needed to document the Indicator or confirm the absence of Indicators )
Depth Matrix
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils'
Redox Features
_ Dark Surface (S7)
(inches) Color moist
%
Color moss Tvoe Loc
Texture Remarks
-►z" 2,
o
I o
_ Hydrogen Su,fide (A4)
'Type C= Concentration, D= Depletion, RM= Reduced Matnx,_MS= Masked Sand Grains 2Location PL =Pore Lining, M =Matnx
Hydric Sol[ Indicators.
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils'
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Dark Surface (S7)
— 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Hishc Epipedon (A2)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
_ Black Histic (A3)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
(MLRA 147, 148)
_ Hydrogen Su,fide (A4)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Piedmont Floodplam Sods (F19)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Red Parent Material (TF2)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
_ Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
_ Iron- Manganese Masses (1`12) (LRR N,
MLRA 147,148)
MLRA 136)
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Umbnc Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122)
'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_ Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Sods (F19) (MLRA 148)
wetland hydrology must be present,
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
unless disturbed of pioblematic
Restrictive Layer (if observed)
Type
Depth (inches)
Hydric Sod Present? Yes No
Remarks
A
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont– Interim Version

Project/Site _.&
Applicant/Owner
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont
SAC City /County lnfG`"�' V►t� °^ Sampling Date Z 3 �-
i rv�dTrfu.J %.i1no ��- Crcl7 State _, Sampling Point p 2--
Investigator(s) I YQP. V0L%&%41Ar- / 5GS Section, Township, Range
Landform (hdislope, terrace, etc) n and &( " Local relief (concave, convex, none) C-04GAr-- Slope
Subregion (LRR or MLRA) f. La``t Long Datum
Soil Map Unit Name iii V'AV%rCnj Sr �i 1 oAM NWI classification
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year's Yes _X No (If no, explain in Remarks )
Are Vegetation , Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes No
Are Vegetation , Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes x No Is the Sampled Area
Hydnc Sod Present? Yes —�7— No within a Wetland? Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ?L No
-1-11e. -f"e- Vk'4 -t4064 C,ri k'j ti ale
?0�4 _is m a w&k6%nd.
HYDROLOGY
Preu-4 , -j"-t
Wetland Hydrology Indicators
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required, check all that aooly)
_ Surface Sod Cracks (136)
_ Surface Water (Al) _
True Aquatic Plants (814)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (68)
High Water Table (A2) —
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
_ Drainage Patterns (B10)
Saturation (A3)
Oxioized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Moss Trim Lines (616)
Water Marks (B7) —
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry- Season Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (62) _
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Sods (C6)
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Drift Deposits (63) _
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_ Algal Mat or Crust (64) _
Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_ Iron Deposits (85)
_ Geomorphic Position (132)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (67)
_ Shallow Aquitard (133)
_ Water - Stained Leaves (69)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
_ Aquatic Fauna (B13)
_ FAC- Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations
Surface Water Present? Yes No X
Depth (inches)
Water Table Present? Yes No
Depth (inches) (oi
--
Saturation Present? Yes X No
Depth (inches) (
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available
Remarks
�Jekt�d hIdeD 100� ►n��ce- mss Gre ��e�r,•��-
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Interim Version

VEGETATION (Four Strata) — Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point DP-2
Tree Stratum (Plot size )
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Saolma /Shrub Stratum (Plot size )
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Absolute Dominant Indicator
% Cover Species? Status
Dominance Test worksheet
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC ' (A)
Total Number of Dominant r
Species Across All Strata ( (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC �� !o (A/B)
2 ►rota
3
4
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata
Tree – Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in (7 6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height
Sapling /Shrub – Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in DBH and greater than 3 28 ft (1 m) tall
Herb –All herbaceous (non - woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3 28 it tall
Woody vine – All woody vines greater than 3 28 ft in
hei ht
5
6
7
Prevalence Index worksheet
Total % Cover of Multioly by
OBL species x 1 =
FACW species x 2 =
FAC species x3=
FACU species x4=
UPL species X5=
Column Totals (A) (B)
9
= Total Cover
11
12
�� =Total Cover
Prevalence Index = B/A =
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophyhc Vegetation
_ 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
_ 3 - Prevalence Index is 53 0'
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supportmg
=
Herb Stratum (Plot size _30 Total Cover
)
1 en r�_e�a a ovu cu e2
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
— Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydnc soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
2 ►rota
3
4
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata
Tree – Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in (7 6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height
Sapling /Shrub – Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in DBH and greater than 3 28 ft (1 m) tall
Herb –All herbaceous (non - woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3 28 it tall
Woody vine – All woody vines greater than 3 28 ft in
hei ht
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
�� =Total Cover
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size ) 9
1
2
3
4
5 Hydrophytrc
Vegetation
6 Present? Yes X No
= Total Cover
Remarks (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet)
t
o � c.
� k� c4owttn4� j h�d�P�
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Interim Version

SOIL
Sampling Point � �-
Profile Description, (Describe to the depth needed to document the Indicator or confirm the absence of Indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color moist % Color moist % Type' Loc Texture Remarks
Hydric Soil Indicators
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Black Hisbc (A3)
_ Hydrogen Suffice (A4)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
_ 2 cm Muck (Al 0) (LRR N)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1)
_ Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
MLRA 147,148)
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Sandy Redox (S5)
i _ Stripped Main.\ (S6)
Type
Depth (inches)
educed Matrix, MS= Masked Sand Grains 2Location PL =Pore Lining, M =Matnx
_ Iron - Manganese Masses (1712) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
Umbric Surface (1713) (MLRA 136,122) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_ Piedmont Floodplam Sods (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present,
unless aisrurbed or problematic
drw Stri� I'AAc'4 -' -s G.-r-
Hydric Soil Present? Yes -,,,\
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Interim Version
Indicators for Problematic Hydnc Sc
_ Dark Surface (S7)
— 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
(MLRA 147, 148)
Loamy Gieyed Matrix (F2)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
_ Piedmont Floodplam Sods (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Red Parent Material (TF2)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Iron - Manganese Masses (1712) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
Umbric Surface (1713) (MLRA 136,122) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_ Piedmont Floodplam Sods (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present,
unless aisrurbed or problematic
drw Stri� I'AAc'4 -' -s G.-r-
Hydric Soil Present? Yes -,,,\
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Interim Version