The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About20071427 Ver 1__20131204BIRKHAVEN SUBDIVSION - STREAM RESTORATION 2013 MONITORING REPORT ECS PROJECT NO. 09- 20495B Guilford County, NC USACE Action ID # SAW 2007 - 03001 -201 DWQ # 2007 -1427 Prepared on behalf of: Venn Birkhaven, LLC 243 South Marshall Street Winston - Salem, NC 27101 (336) 749 -1012 Prepared by: 0 ECS Carolinas, LLP 4811 Koger Blvd Greensboro, NC 27407 336- 856 -7150 EeA ECS CAROLINAS, LLP "Setting the Standard for Service" m11111111 _ Ceotechnical . Construction Materials - Environmental . Facilities NCR egi ,teicdEngineerxirgRm'1C78 Mr. Craig Brown Regulatory Project Manager U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Raleigh Regulatory Field Office 3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105 Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587 December 4, 2013 Ms. Sue Homewood NC DENR Winston -Salem Reg. Office Division of Water Resources 585 Waughtown Street Winston - Salem, NC 27107 Reference: 2013 Annual Monitoring Report (Year 2) Birkhaven Subdivision — Stream Restoration Summerfield, North Carolina USACE Action ID # SAW 2007 - 03001 -201 DWQ # 2007 -1427 ECS Project No. 09- 20495B Dear Mr. Brown /Ms. Homewood: Permits for a stream and buffer restoration project at the Birkhaven Subdivision were issued by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers ( USACE Action Id # SAW 2007 - 03001 -201) and the North Carolina Division of Water Quality (NCDWQ # 2007 - 1427). Construction of the project was completed in 2007. High Point Bank acquired the property in 2011 through foreclosure and received a Notice of Violation dated February 16, 2012 for failure to comply with the above referenced permits and water quality certification. High Point Bank contracted ECS Carolinas, LLP (ECS) to assist them in repairing the stream and revegetating the adjacent buffers. The stream repair work was completed in April 2012. Re- planting was completed in January 2013. The first year of annual monitoring was completed in 2012. The information herein represents the 2nd year of annual monitoring of the Birkhaven Subdivision Stream Restoration Site. In 2013, Venn Birkhaven, LLC acquired the property and associated restoration project from High Point Bank. Monitoring efforts in 2013 were completed by ECS on behalf of Venn Birkhaven, LLC. The new ownership contact information is: Andy Dreyfuss Venn Birkhaven, LLC 243 South Marshall Street Winston - Salem, NC 27101 (336) 749 -1012 4811 Koger Blvd., Greensboro, NC 27407 - T 336 -856 -7160 . F: 336 - 366 -716 - w%m,,/.ecshrnfted.com LCS CapitnI Sprvices PLLC « ECS Carolinas, LLP ECS Central, PLLi ECS Florida, LLr_ 4 ECS Mid Atlantic, LLC - ECS r ;d,.re,st, LLC Er,S Su th a Ft, L1 a EC; texas, LLP 2013 Annual Monitoring Report (Year 2) Birkhaven Subdivision — Stream Restoration Summerfield, North Carolina ECS Project No. 09- 204958 If there are questions regarding this report, or a need for further information, please contact us at (336) 856 -7150. Respectfully submitted, ECS CAROLINAS, LLP y David S. Brame Project Manager cc: Ms. Cyndi Karoly, DWQ Mr. Andy Dreyfus, Venn Birkhaven, LLC Michael T. Brame Environmental Department Manager BIRKHAVEN SUBDIVISION 2ND ANNUAL MONITORING REPORT ECS PROJECT No. 09- 204958 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION .............................................................................. ..............................2 2.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION ................................................................. ..............................3 3.0 MONITORING ACTIVITIES ............................................................ ..............................4 4.0 MONITORING RESULTS ................................................................. ..............................4 5.0 RESTORATION SUCCESS CRITERIA ........................................... ..............................4 5.1 Stream Dimension ........................................................................... ..............................4 5.2 Stream Pattern and Profile .............................................................. ..............................4 5.3 Stream Bed Material Analysis ........................................................ ..............................4 5.4 Photograph Reference Sites ............................................................ ..............................5 5.5 Bankfull Events ............................................................................... ..............................5 5.6 Vegetative Sampling ....................................................................... ..............................5 5.7 Benthic Macroinvertebrate Sampling ............................................. ..............................5 6_0 MAINTENANCE AND CONTINGENCY PLANS .......................... ..............................5 6.1 New Development ........................................................................... ..............................5 6.2 Stream and Vegetation Maintenance and Recommendations ......... ..............................6 7_0 COMMENTS AND OBSERVATIONS ............................................. ..............................6 Appendix A: Site Plans Appendix B: Monitoring Cross Sections Appendix C: Monitoring Profile Appendix D: Monitoring Pebble Counts Appendix E: Monitoring Photographs Appendix F: Vegetative Sampling Data ECS Carolinas, LLP BIRKHAVEN SUBDIVISION 2ND ANNUAL MONITORING REPORT ECS PROJECT No. 09- 204958 1.0 INTRODUCTION The Birkhaven Stream Restoration Project was created to offset impacts resulting from two road crossings. The objective of this project is to provide on -site mitigation to offset impacts in the Cape Fear 03030002 hydrologic unit. The mitigation units required are being satisfied through the creation of approximately 633 linear feet of stream channel and the enhancement of approximately 620 linear feet of stream channel. Construction of the project was completed in 2007. High Point Bank acquired the property in 2011 through foreclosure. Monitoring and stream maintenance were not performed between 2007 and 2011. High Point Bank received a Notice of Violation dated February 16, 2012 for failure to comply with the criteria of the permits. Stream repair work was completed in April 2012 to correct the violations. Re- planting was completed in January 2013. In mid -2013, Venn Birkhaven, LLC acquired the site from High Point Bank. The second year of annual monitoring was completed by ECS in 2013 on behalf of Venn Birkhaven, LLC. This report includes the second year of annual monitoring. ECS Carolinas, LLP 2 BIRKHAVEN SUBDIVISION 2ND ANNUAL MONITORING REPORT ECS PROJECT No. 09- 204958 2.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION The Birkhaven Stream Restoration Project is located on an approximate 116 acre tract known as the Birkhaven Subdivision on Birkhaven Drive near Summerfield, Guilford County, North Carolina (Figure 1 and Figure 2). Figure 2: USGS Topographic Map, Summerfield, North Carolina Quadrangle ECS Carolinas, LLP BIRKHAVEN SUBDIVISION 2ND ANNUAL MONITORING REPORT ECS PROJECT No. 09- 204958 3.0 MONITORING ACTIVITIES Year two monitoring was completed for the site. The monitoring was performed in Spetember and October 2013. The data analyzed includes stream channel cross sections (Appendix B) and stream channel profiles (Appendix C) measured with a virtual reference station (VRS), pebble counts (Appendix D) with a gravelometer and photographs (Appendix E) taken with a digital camera. Observations of structures, vegetation and problem areas were made throughout the data collection process and are documented in this report. 4.0 MONITORING RESULTS ECS surveyed the stream restoration reach to evaluate the stream profile and cross sections. Graphs depicting the survey results of stream channel cross sections are included in Appendix B and stream channel profiles are included in Appendix C. The results of the surveying do not reveal significant changes from the as -built survey. The survey data indicates stable cross sections with no significant widening or increases in depth. Based on a comparison of the as -built data, there has been no significant change in the streambed material in the riffles or pools. Graphs of pebble counts at each of the cross sections are included in Appendix D. 5.0 RESTORATION SUCCESS CRITERIA 5.1 Stream Dimension Cross section data was collected at established monitoring locations using a geophysical virtual reference system (VRS). Four cross sections were analyzed using Microsoft Excel software and compared to as -built data. Graphs of the resulting data are included in Appendix B. The cross sectional dimensions of the streams are generally consistent with the as -built data. Based on visual observations, significant erosion is not evident in areas of the stream that were not evaluated by the cross sections. 5.2 Stream Pattern and Profile Stream pattern and profile data was collected for the entire length using a geophysical VRS. Data collected included thalweg depth, inverts of in- stream structures and water surface elevation. This data was analyzed using Microsoft Excel software and compared to as -built data. This data is presented in graphs located in Appendix C. Significant changes were not observed in the thalweg depth or in the stream pattern. Elevation and slope of the riffle and pool sections are consistent with as -built data. Some deepening is apparent in the pool adjacent to cross -vein 4. However, the stream banks, arms of the cross -vein and downstream riffle appear to be stable with no need for corrective actions. 5.3 Stream Bed Material Analysis Stream bed material analysis was done at each permanent cross section. A gravelometer was used to determine pebble size. Based on a comparison of the as -built data, some gravel size material has shifted into the pool cross sectional areas. The gravel is from loose material used to construct the riffles. While some gravel has moved downstream from the constructed riffles, the riffle sections appear stable with an assortment of cobles, gravels, pebbles and sand. Graphs of pebble counts at each of the cross sections are included in Appendix D. ECS Carolinas, LLP 4 BIRKHAVEN SUBDIVISION 2ND ANNUAL MONITORING REPORT ECS PROJECT No. 09- 204958 5.4 Photograph Reference Sites Photographs were taken using a digital camera and are documented in the Photo Log in Appendix E. Photographs were taken at established vegetation plots in October. Photographs were taken at each stream structure as shown in Appendix A in November. 5.5 Bankfull Events No bankfull events have occurred at this time. Due to the height of the banks (approximately 5 to 6 feet) and the size of the stream and stream network, bankful events are not expected. However, two rain events that increased water elevation by approximately 1 to 1.5 feet as evidenced by flattened vegetation and debris wrack lines occurred in the 2012 calendar year. Several significant rainfall events also occurred during 2013. No significant erosion or damage has been observed as a result of these events. 5.6 Vegetative Sampling Vegetation sampling plots were established to monitor the survival success of the vegetative buffer. The locations of these plots are distributed across the planted portions of the site (see photos in Appendix E). The data resulting from the sampling of the vegetative plots can be found in Appendix F. Based on the sampling, vegetation is within the success range for vegetative criteria. Table 1 shows the current stocking levels. 5.7 Benthic Macroinvertebrate Sampling Benthic macro - invertebrates sampling is not required for this site and sampling was not conducted. Crayfish and minnows were observed during our monitoring efforts 6.0 MAINTENANCE AND CONTINGENCY PLANS 6.1 New Development At the end of the second year of monitoring, survey data of the restored stream has indicated no significant changes in stream stability. Additionally, visual observations have not identified areas that need repair. Vegetation requirements have been met for the first year of monitoring. No additional planting is recommended. ECS Carolinas, LLP TREES OBSERVED 15' Radius Plot STOCKING LEVEL (PER ACRE) Plot 1 9 555 Plot 2 11 678 Plot 3 10 617 Plot 4 6 370 Plot 5 9 555 Plot 6 12 740 Plot 7 12 740 Average 10 608 Success criteria at the end of year 5 is 320 trees per acre. 5.7 Benthic Macroinvertebrate Sampling Benthic macro - invertebrates sampling is not required for this site and sampling was not conducted. Crayfish and minnows were observed during our monitoring efforts 6.0 MAINTENANCE AND CONTINGENCY PLANS 6.1 New Development At the end of the second year of monitoring, survey data of the restored stream has indicated no significant changes in stream stability. Additionally, visual observations have not identified areas that need repair. Vegetation requirements have been met for the first year of monitoring. No additional planting is recommended. ECS Carolinas, LLP BIRKHAVEN SUBDIVISION 2ND ANNUAL MONITORING REPORT ECS PROJECT No. 09- 204958 6.2 Stream and Vegetation Maintenance and Recommendations No repairs /maintenance are recommended at this time. 7.0 COMMENTS AND OBSERVATIONS Stream repairs were completed in April 2012. Vegetative buffers were planted in January 2013. Several heavy rain events have occurred since the repairs were completed. The events have not cause damage to the stream. As evidenced by year 1 and year 2 monitoring, the overall nature of the stream is stable. No repairs or maintenance are recommended at this time. Periodic inspections in conjunction with the annual monitoring will be continued to evaluate the streams condition and success of vegetative plantings. Any maintenance requirements and repairs will be reported to the USACE and NC DWR. ECS Carolinas, LLP 6 Channel Mitigation Monitoring Streets I, II, III, AND I{i7 Monitoring Data Record Project Title: Birkhaven Subdivsion — Stream Restoration COE Action ID: 2007- 03001 -201 Stream Name- Unnamed tributary of Reedy Fork DW Q Munber: 2007 -1427 Cite, Courity and other Location Information: Summerfield, Guilford County, NC Date Cf-xistruction Completed: 2007 Repaired April 2012 Monitoring Year ( 2 ) of 5 Ecoiegion] Central Piedmont 8 digit HUC unit 03030002 USES Quad Narne and Coordinates - Summerfield, NC Quad 36, 11' 47.10" N 79, 56' 42.05" W Rosgen Classification: C Length of Projects Apprx. 633 LF Prior 1, 620 LF Prior 3 Urban or R11ral_ Rural Watershed Size: Approx. 70 Acres Mointoring DATA collected by: FCS Carolinas, LLC Date: October/November 2013 Applicant Information- Name: Venn Birkhaven, LLC /Andy Dreyfuss Address: 243 South Marshall Street, NC, 27101 Telephone - Niunber: 336 -881 -3465 Email address: Andy Dreyfuss [Adreyfussra? Section 2. PLAINT SURVIV, AL Attach plan sheet indicating plots and sample area locations and reference photos. Sur-viva] plots: DATE- Area within the easement is- "uea sampled by swi° ival plots: See Report Number of swidval plots sampled: Random or nonrandom site selection- % Coverage within siu-vivat plots is: Photos of reference plots taken. yes/no Range of sm-6val for all plots: Prow ide a written description of specific data or findings and photos as needed for clarity. Live Stake counts: Zone I DATE: ,Area within the easement 1S7 Area sampled for stake slam, ival: See Report Number of plots sampled: Random or nonrandom. site selection: Average number of surviving stakes: Range of sm-6val for all plots: Provide a vrritten description of specific data or findings as needed for clarity- Tree cotuits- Zone 2 DATE- 4u,ea within the easement 1S7 Area. sampled for tree siny'rval: See Report Number of plots sampled: Random or nonrandonn site selection: Average inunber of sin-viving trees: Range of sut-vival for all plots: Provide a vrritten description of specific data or findings as needed for clarity- Bankfidl Events: Dater easured- Method of Verification: COMMENTS- See If required to complete Level 1 and Level 2 monitoring 2!IL stop here; othet-wise, complete section 3. Section 3. C1L--A_N-.S.'EL ST-XBILITY Attach plan sheet(s) indicating the locations of cross-sections and beginning and ending of longitudinal profiles if the entire reach is not profiled. Year to year cluniges in cross-sections- longitudinal profile and bed inaterial should be plotted and submitted. Comparison overlays from previous, years for profile and cross - section inonitoring should be provided. Cross sections. attach plots of each cross-section showing year to year changes. Provide the followin,2 data for each cross-section- Date measured Station, Number Avg slope riffles as- bunt:' resent Station Number Station Number Av,g- slope ppots- as- bunt:' resent See Cross-section being measured >_ See Report Number of pools: as- bunt:' resent Is water piping D16: as- built /present Cross-sectional area- as-biiiltlpresent See Report structitrel D84-. as- built /present Bankffill width- as-built/present Head cut or dowii Flood cone Width- as-built/present Each station has been evaluated and photographed. W'idth/depth: as-built./present Bank- or scour Entrenchment ratio: as-built-'present erosion present' Stream Type: as-buitt/present* Other problems * only, required for riffle cross sections Longitudinal profiles: attach plots of the longitudinal profile sho-wing year to year changes and the locations of installed or naftwal strucnires that affect profile- Date ineasiwed Station, Number Avg slope riffles as- bunt:' resent Station Number Station Number Av,g- slope ppots- as- bunt:' resent See Number of riffles- as-buitt,present >_ See Report Number of pools: as- bunt:' resent Report Pebble counts: Attach a printout of pebble count data and a graphical plot of bed inaterial showni.2 the cumulative % finer than X nullimeters and the nuinber of particles in standard size classes- Year to year changes in bed material should also be plotted and provided. Date ineasui�d Station, Number Station Number Station Number Station Number Station, Number Structure Type Cross-section being Ideas rred >_ See Report Is water piping D16: as- built /present through or around D50: as -built resent structitrel D84-. as- built /present Head cut or dowii Each station has been evaluated and photographed. -Visual Inspection: The entire stream. proj . ect as well as each in-stream stnicture and bank st,,ibilizatioii.,revetiiietit structure inirst be evaluated and problems addressed,. Date Inspected Station, Number Station Number Station Number Station Number Station, Number Structure Type Is water piping through or around structitrel See Report - Head cut or dowii Each station has been evaluated and photographed. out present? Bank- or scour erosion present' Other problems noted') NOTE: Attach separate narrative sheets to each monitoring report describing. discussing the overall monitoring results. Include the identification of specific problem areasr'chuinel failures . estimated cause and proposed-required remedial action. -11-ds should include a brief discussion of any parameter that has changed significantly from as -built (See success criteria discussion in Section 11 -) APPENDIX A SITE PLANS ,________�______�__________ // ---1w ' | ] - / 0 0 � o U U U o � Ct N w � o ct i � t / r I_ l 0 / 0 i U ra"�+* ct V 1 � war � a7rIHi8 zsY ' o Li a 1 � aN H"IdrIIiI £ SX 1 Ci bq Q y0 ?OOd cC N \ .1f ` II "w r", '~f APPENDIX B MONITORING CROSS SECTIONS O 0 CL _ c : v @ � ■ ■ 0 � U . p m 2 � � � � � � � � �y � � 9 \ § e R G p§ \ m ) § § \ d \ ! / R / / § § S / § - / r § \ a \ R & G S S § § - § \ - ) } _� ) 7 .0 m 0 k W k f / m = e e o W M f ƒ ® § « § § 0 5 c 0 e o m E§ u \ 3 Cl) g § \ e = w e _ _ _ = o = § § § § ugmA9l @ k � C4 c 2 U @ m ■ ■ 0 U LO » m CN o e o » e § @ @ § \ @ § § co co UOIIAB913 I 0 § 0 $ g R \ \ I C? LO 0 § e / & / 0 0 00 / ? Q § / — ƒ e / p m 0 0 00 / \ $ § / — ƒ ■ ± o 0 0 9 9 g 9 — j) - G / 9 # } _� 6 7 f a \ j ry §) \ m f & / m = e e t o � f 0 ® § « § § 0 9 f 0 o m E§ u @ k � q c O 2 @ m ■ ■ 0 U ugmA9l / / E § S S § C § § § q- 0 » o » s n 9 0 9 g 2 # g § 2 - ƒ e / e » o e � ) ] § § § ) - ) } _� 6 7 f a $ / ry ) § \ m w & / m = e 2 o f 0 ® ( I § § 2 9 f B o m L 4 u O 0 CL � c 0 2 @ m ■ ■ 0 U P— Q L C _ O O 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 R ugmA9l O LO c1r) O 0 c1r) O LO � O 0 � e § 7 9 9 f \ F § § k Q — m § ¥ 0 LO O 0 O L6 0 / / 7 / 0 \ a e d — e C14 r — \ ■ f \ \ G) \ ] R m § 2 — # \ _�\ 7 : £ $ / ry M) k f k / m = e e o o U) f 0 ® § I § § 0 9 f B o m E 4 u APPENDIX C MONITORING PROFILE Pattern Comparison 1721060 1721110 1721160 1721210 Easting 891650 I, V �A f { 891550 e 891450 u S 891350 Z �u �f 891250 :p 891150 1 As -built 12012 2013 -X- Sections .; Structures A 891050 1721060 1721110 1721160 1721210 Easting 4- O L a c C O J M r O N O O O O O O O O O O O LO O LO O LO O LO O LO ,qt M M N N O O CF) co co co co co co co co co r- UOIIBA013 R 0 0 0 LO 0 0 0 a 0 o � 0 0 M 0 0 0 N O O O r I c O N •L cv Q E O U Q O L a .cm c O J M r O N UOIIBA013 C O CO 0 0 M N ao v m0 0 N N 0 0 m } N 0 V 0 0 N 0 0 `m (1) 4 00 N 0 0 N 0 0 m 0 N Q N N N N O = O D- d E E > > 7 7 Q Q Z Z APPENDIX D MONITORING PEBBLE COUNTS 100% 90% 80% 70% m 60% c c a� U v 50% Q 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% 2013 Bankfull Channel Pebble Count, Cross Section 1 - Pool silt/clay I sand gravel D50 cobble cobble boulder D65 9.8 D84 V V V V V V V 0 V V V V V V V V I V V V V V V V V V D95 53 0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000 particle size (mm) cumulative % -# of particles Size (mm) D16 1 D35 5.3 D50 72% cobble 7.8 D65 9.8 D84 18 D95 53 Size Distribution mean 4.2 dispersion 5.1 skewness 0.24 Type silt/clay 8% sand 17% gravel 72% cobble 3% boulder 0% I 25 20 15 c 3 s m 0 v m 10 N 5 100% 90% 80% 70% c m 60% c c a� U Q 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% 2013 Bankfull Channel Pebble Count, Cross Section 2 - Riffle silt/clay I sand gravel D50 cobble cobble boulder D65 12 D84 23 V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V 75 0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000 particle size (mm) cumulative % # of particles Size (mm) D16 1.7 D35 5.8 D50 76% cobble 8.5 D65 12 D84 23 D95 75 Size Distribution mean 6.3 dispersion 3.9 skewness 0.13 Type silt/clay 5% sand 13% gravel 76% cobble 6% boulder 0% 20 18 16 14 12 c 3 a m 10 ° v n m 8 N 6 4 2 0 10000 100% 90% 80% 70% c m 60% c c a� 50% Q 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% 2013 Bankfull Channel Pebble Count, Cross Section 3 - Riffle silt/clay I sand gravel D50 cobble cobble boulder D65 17 D84 V V V V V V V V V V V V 0 V V D95 30 0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000 particle size (mm) cumulative % -# of particles Size (mm) Size Distribution Type D16 0.73 mean 4.0 D35 8.6 dispersion 9.8 D50 skewness cobble 13 0.42 D65 17 D84 22 D95 30 silt/clay 14% sand 5% gravel 81% cobble 0% boulder 0% 35 30 25 Z) 20 c3 a m 0 v 15 N 10 5 0 10000 100% 90% 80% 70% c m t 60% c c a� U Q 50% .-. — — — -- 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% 0.01 0.1 Size (mm) D16 3.9 D35 9.3 D50 89% cobble 15 D65 19 D84 25 D95 39 2013 Bankfull Channel Pebble Count, Cross Section 4 - Pool sana gravel I c000ie I imiaer 1 10 100 particle size (mm) cumulative % # of particles Size Distribution mean 9.9 dispersion 2.8 skewness 0.20 1000 silt/clay 3% sand 7% gravel 89% cobble 2% boulder 0% 30 25 20 c 3 a m 15 ° v 0' m N 10 5 � 1 111 APPENDIX E MONITORING PHOTOGRAPHS O H MO W z w 0 x E cl on U N r- O U N O O E 0 U N r- O U O O O H MO W z w 0 x E cl on U N N O U N O O E 0 U N N O U O O O H MO W z w 0 x E cl on U N M O U N O O E 0 U N M O U O O O H MO W z w 0 x E cl on U N O U N O O E 0 U N O U O O O H MO W z w 0 x E cl on U N O U N O O E 0 U N O U O O O H MO W z w 0 x E cl on U N O U N O O E 0 U N O U O O O H MO W z w 0 x E cl on U N O U N O O E 0 U N O U O O H M� W rA V F� on U N r- O Q bA O N O O I N O 'C bA U N r- O Q bA O O O I on U N N O Q bA O N O O N O 'C bA U N N O Q bA O ^-i O O H M� W rA V F� on U N M O Q bA O N O O I N O 'C bA U N M O Q bA O O O I on U N O Q bA O N O O N O 'C bA U N O Q bA O ^-i O O I on U U r- O U U O U N O O I U O 'C bA U U r- O U U O U O O I on U U N O U U O U N O O I U O 'C bA U U N O U U O U O O I on U U M O U U O U N O O I U O 'C bA U U M O U U O U O O I on U U O U U O U N O O I U O 'C bA U U O U U O U O O cl cl N on U N r- O to cl cl CA O N to N N O O O bA U N r- O bA O N bA N O O on U N r- O bA cl cl CA O N to N O O O bA U N r- O bA cl CA O N to N M O O cl cl N on U N N O to cl cl CA O N to N N O O O bA U N N O bA O N bA N O O on U N N O bA cl cl CA O N to N O O O bA U N N O bA cl CA O N to N M O O cl cl N on U N M O to cl cl CA O N to N N O O O bA U N M O bA O N bA N O O on U N M O bA cl cl CA O N to N O O O bA U N M O bA cl CA O N to N M O O cl cl N on U N O to cl cl CA O N to N N O O O bA U N O bA O N bA N O O on U N O bA cl cl CA O N to N O O O bA U N O bA cl CA O N to N M O O cl cl N on U N O to cl cl CA O N to N N O O O bA U N O bA O N bA N O O on U N O bA cl cl CA O N to N O O O bA U N O bA cl CA O N to N M O O cl cl N on U N O to cl cl CA O N to N N O O O bA U N O bA O N bA N O O on U N O bA cl cl CA O N to N O O O bA U N O bA cl CA O N to N M O O cl cl N on U N O to cl cl CA O N to N N O O O bA U N O bA O N bA N O O on U N O bA cl cl CA O N to N O O O bA U N O bA cl CA O N to N M O O APPENDIX F VEGETATIVE SAMPLING DATA VEGETATION PLOT 1 # of Living Trees General Notes: status: A= Alive, D =Dead condition: G =Good, F =Fair, P =Poor VEGETATION PLOT 2 # of Living Trees 11 General Notes: status: A= Alive, D =Dead condition: G =Good, F =Fair, P =Poor Iff-1701 or, or, -now Mom Iff-1701 or, or, M-Im • M-Im 00�� • • �0�� • # of Living Trees 11 General Notes: status: A= Alive, D =Dead condition: G =Good, F =Fair, P =Poor VEGETATION PLOT 3 # of Living Trees 10 General Notes: status: A= Alive, D =Dead condition: G =Good, F =Fair, P =Poor VEGETATION PLOT 4 # of Living Trees General Notes: status: A= Alive, D =Dead condition: G =Good, F =Fair, P =Poor My # of Living Trees General Notes: status: A= Alive, D =Dead condition: G =Good, F =Fair, P =Poor VEGETATION PLOT 5 # of Living Trees General Notes: status: A= Alive, D =Dead condition: G =Good, F =Fair, P =Poor Several trees antlered /damaged by deer • M, • M, # of Living Trees General Notes: status: A= Alive, D =Dead condition: G =Good, F =Fair, P =Poor Several trees antlered /damaged by deer VEGETATION PLOT 6 Tree Type Tree Number Date 2013 2014 2015 Southern red oak 1 A G Southern red oak 2 A G Flowering dogwood 3 A G Flowerinq do wood 4 A G Redbud 5 A G Green ash 6 A G Southern red oak 7 A G Southern red oak 8 A G Southern red oak 9 A G Southern red oak 10 A G Southern red oak 11 A G Red maple 12 A G # of Living Trees 12 General Notes: status: A= Alive, D =Dead condition: G =Good, F =Fair, P =Poor Several trees antlered /damaged by deer VEGETATION PLOT 7 Tree Type Tree Number Date 2013 2014 2015 Planted s . Unknown 1 A G Flowering dogwood 2 A G Sweet um 3 A G Sweet um 4 A G Black um 5 A F Black um 6 A F Sycamore 7 A G Sycamore 8 A G Sycamore 9 A G Southern red oak 10 A G Southern red oak 11 A G Southern red oak 12 A G # of Living Trees 12 General Notes: status: A= Alive, D =Dead condition: G =Good, F =Fair, P =Poor Several trees antlered /damaged by deer O N Q U � Q O N LO O ~ N rn o � — rn m � o .? � J O N Q U 0 Q O N � � O ~ N n o � m � o .> � J O Q LO co r— O LO O O co Qp In I— — [�- LO q-* q-* O rn � N N M r a O N rn N o CF) O (D CF) N N CF) — rn (6 � o .? � J co C � _ O L co N O co L — O O L y-+ 1 N N CO LO (O r— N N (2) L 0 ^0 ^0 ^0 ^0 ^0 ^0 ^0 LL LL LL LL LL LL LL L0 L� L co c(2) G O Co d Q U O Q � CO N CO .N - co LO O O FL O 17 O N CQ C co U) N 7 co N N O Z