WQCSD0090_Flow Reduction Request_20211122

• ,1,J�''�' < MUNICIPAL ENGINEERING , INC .
� �
6n�ineeraty Excellence.•Aire vatis,e 4 aeAes/rasta dle Solatirs
C/N E Ems\
November 22,2021
Mr.Michael Montebello
Supervisor RECEIVED
NC Dept. of Environmental Quality
Municipal Permitting Unit " '/ 2 2 2021
Pretreatment&Collection Systems
512 N. Salisbury Street NCDEQ/DWRINr�tS
Archdale Building,9th Floor
Raleigh,NC 27604 VIA UPS GROUND
RE: Town of Micro
Residential Sanitary Sewer
Flow Reduction Request
Dear.Mr.Montebello,
I am attaching two (2) copies of the "Town of Micro-Residential Sanitary Sewer Flow Reduction Study"
on behalf of the Town.They have a new 83-lot subdivision coming in next year,which will maximize their
sewer allocation with the Town of Kenly.Therefore they are requesting a reduction from the standard 120-
GPD per bedroom to reserve some of their existing capacity for others.
They are requesting the same reduction granted to Johnston County Public Utilities,which serves the area
around them. We believe the attached Flow Reduction Study justifies the request to reduce the flow to 80-
GPD per bedroom with a minimum of 160-GPD for one and two-bedroom dwellings.
If you have any questions or need additional information,please don't hesitate to contact Mayor Warren or
me with the Town of Micro.
Sincerely,
MUNICIPAL ENGINEERING,INC.
fi/c-4/ / "--
Michael L. McAllister,M-ASCE
Principal Project Manager
CC: Bobby Blowe,PE
Hon.Jay Warren,Mayor
Town of Micro
P.O. Box 9
Micro,NC 27555
MESCO.COM
License No. F-0812
1 GARNER PH: [phone] Q 68 SHIPWASH DR., GARNER, NC 27529 GARNER Fx: (919) 772-1 1 76
BOONE PH: [phone] 820 STATE FARM RD., BOONE, NC 28607 BOONE Fx: [phone]

DI
TOWN OF MICRO,
NORTH CAROLINA
OF t=j
,
fix
Coto
RESIDENTIAL SANITARY SEWER
FLOW REDUCTION STUDY
November 2021
•♦♦♦t�7.i969,�a��B
N_.," . Sii�/��y'"�. '''
ifs(, 44%1
Ntc�,p It V
SEAL . =
4.J '4< t 19677oc
/11 E.
oO'
'le 4008E ��•.```zozl
� -�•. •nor±��e �b►�`� BSI
CIN/EERA
Municipal Engineering, Inc.
68 Shipwash Drive, Garner, NC 27529
Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
Corporate License No. F-0812 & C-586

Town of Micro, North Carolina
Residential Flow Reduction Study
NOTICE
This copyrighted material represents the proprietary work product of Municipal Engineering, Inc. This
material was prepared for the specific purpose of securing a contract with the Town of Micro, North
Carolina. No other use, reproduction, or distribution of this material or the approaches it contains is
authorized without the prior express written consent of Municipal Engineering Inc.However,the recipient
may make as many copies of this document as deemed necessary for the sole purpose of evaluating this
document for final selection and award.
©Copyright,2021
Municipal Engineering Inc.
All Rights Reserved

TOWN OF MICRO I FLOW REDUCTION STUDY
1.0—EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 2
1.1 —INTRODUCTION AND PURPOSE 2
2.0—EXISTING WATER & SEWER SYSTEMS 3
2.1 WATER SYSTEM 3
2.2 SANITARY SEWER COLLECTION System 3
3.0 Evaluation of The data 3
3.1 METHODOLOGY 3
3.1.1 ACQUISITION OF DATA 4
3.1.2 MICRO RESIDENTIAL FLOW DATA 4
3.1.3 MICRO NON-RESIDENTIAL FLOW 5
3.1.4 TOTAL MICRO FLOW 6
3.1.5 KENLY DATA 7
3.1.6 COMPARISON OF KENLY AND MICRO 7
3.1.7 RAINFALL DATA 8
3.1.8 RAINFALL VS FLOW 9
4.0 Conclusion & Recommendations 10
4.1 CONCLUSIONS 10
4.2 RECOMMENDATIONS 10
5.0 Acknowledgement and References 11
5.1 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 11
5.2 REFERENCES 11
Table of Figures
FIGURE 1-RESIDENTIAL FLOW 5
FIGURE 2-NON-RESIDENTIAL FLOW 6
FIGURE 3-MICRO TOTAL FLOW 6
FIGURE 4-KENLY TOTAL FLOW 7
FIGURE 5-MICRO VS KENLY FLOW 8
FIGURE 6-DISCHARGE VS KENLY FLOW 8
FIGURE 7-RAIN DATA 9
FIGURE 8-MICRO VS RAIN DATA 9
FIGURE 9-KENLY FLOW VS RAIN DATA 10
Appendices:
A. Paper "Retrofitting Residential Fixtures"
B. Micro Local Water Supply Plan
C. Johnston County Public Utilities-Residential Flow Reduction Approval Letter.
D. Residential Flow Data
1 Final:
Municipal Engineering,Inc.

TOWN OF MICRO I FLOW REDUCTION STUDY
1.0 — EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
1.1 —INTRODUCTION AND PURPOSE
The Town of Micro has contracted with Municipal Engineering,Inc.(ME)to analyze the township's
residential sewer flows to seek a flow allocation reduction from the current flow allocation per bedroom of
120-Gallons per Day (GPD) per bedroom as defined in §15A NCAC 2T 0.0114 (c). The purpose of the
reduction request is to maximize its current 60,000 GPD flow allocation from the Town of Kenly. The
reduction study herein supports the request is in accordance with §15A NCAC 2T 0.0114 (a).
According to the latest data available from the North Carolina Office of State Budget and
Management, the Town of Micro population of 672 people (2019 estimate). The estimated growth rate is
11.44% (2015-2019), and 30.3% of the households fall below the Median Household Income (MHI) of
$31,875. According to the Carolina Demography [4], Johnston County is the 7th fastest growing county in
the State of North Carolina. Most of the growth has occurred near the Town of Clayton. However, due to
the recent rise in housing costs, the growth has spread east of Clayton.
The Town of Micro has discussed purchasing additional capacity with the Town of Kenly at their
wastewater treatment facility; however, the Kenly facility's hydraulic flow is averaging 0.489 MGD from
January 2021 through September 2021 average daily flow is 77.6% of its NPDES permitted capacity of
0.63 MGD. The average hydraulic flow of 0.489 according to the Discharge Monitoring Reports (DMRs)
for the period. Once the Town of Kenly reaches 80% for this calendar year, it is likely they will be under
a moratorium.The Town of Kenly is currently working on an Asset Inventory Assessment(AIA)to identify
areas of their sanitary sewer collection system, which need immediate attention to address
inflow/infiltration (I/I). Kenly is looking at the possibility of expanding its permitted capacity; however,
Johnston County is currently seeking an Engineer to perform a comprehensive regionalization study for
northern Johnston County, which will include the Towns of Princeton, Pine Level, Kenly, and Micro. The
preparation of a regional plan,and subsequent siting,permitting,acquisition of nutrient credits,and funding
of a new treatment facility is most likely at least 5-years or more into the future, which does not cover the
immediate need.
The Town of Micro has also discussed the potential of constructing a Land Application Treatment
System. However,considering finding available land with soils capable of sustaining a spray field,lagoons,
and treatment system will take time, and unless the Town were to receive grant funds for such a project,
the Town does not have the user base to pay for the substantial debt service.
2 Final:
Municipal Engineering,Inc. 0.

TOWN OF MICRO I FLOW REDUCTION STUDY
2.0 — EXISTING WATER & SEWER SYSTEMS
2.1 WATER SYSTEM
The Town of Micro, located in northeast Johnston County, NC, currently has about 5 miles of
distribution system lines. It conveys its sanitary sewer flow to the Town of Kenly for treatment at its
wastewater treatment facility. According to the 2020 Local Water Supply Plan on file with the NCDEQ
[1], the Town has 260 residential, 20 commercial, and 10 institutional metered connections.
2.2 SANITARY SEWER COLLECTION SYSTEM
The sanitary sewer collection system within the Town of Micro is unique in its design and function.
The system installed in the mid-1980s consists of individual 1,500-gallon concrete tanks at each residence,
similar to a septic tank. The effluent flow from the tank is discharged as decant (no solids) near the top,
identical to the operation of a conventional septic tank. The effluent septage is conveyed via a network of
4-inch and 6-inch pipes with clean-out to one of the pump stations. The Town of Micro pumps the solids
from the tanks periodically. We believe this system was funded and installed via the EPA Innovative
Technology program that existed at that time. All new sanitary sewer collection components will be
installed conforming to the current design standards used for fast-track applications.
The average daily flow to the Town of Kenly for 2020 was 0.03475 million gallons per day(MGD).
The Town of Micro has recently renewed its contractual agreement with Kenly to treat a maximum of
60,000 GPD. Due to recent anticipated growth, the Town desires to keep the maximum amount at 60,000
GPD of the allocation in reserve by performing an engineering study and requesting a reduction in the
allocated flows per residential unit.
3.0 EVALUATION OF THE DATA
3.1 METHODOLOGY
The Town of Kenly measures flows from the Town of Micro via a magnetic flow meter located
along U.S. Hwy. 301, which is read monthly for billing purposes. The Town of Kenly provided the
Monthly flow data from February 2019 to October 2021. The Town of Micro provided water meter data
from its customers from September 2020 to September 2021. ME requested three years of data from the
Town,but only the data from September 2020 to September 2021 is available due to an accounting software
change.
3 Final:
Municipal Engineering,Inc. /IIE

TOWN OF MICRO I FLOW REDUCTION STUDY
3.1.1 ACQUISITION OF DATA
Wastewater water flows for the Town of Micro were analyzed based upon data provided by the
Town as defined in §15A NCAC 2T 0.0114 (f). The information was compiled in a spreadsheet that details
the type of customer, customer name and address,number of bedrooms per customer,monthly water usage
per customer, and rainfall data. ME were provided the following data:
1. Monthly flow data from the Town of Kenly from February 2019- September 2021
2. Monthly billing data from all customers served by the Town of Micro from September 2020
to September 2021
3. Monthly rainfall data from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
(NOAA) [2].
4. Bedrooms for each residential customer served by the Town from the Johnston County
GIS and Tax office [3].
3.1.2 MICRO RESIDENTIAL FLOW DATA
Each customer's name, address, number of bedrooms, and monthly billing data were entered into
the spreadsheet for residential flows. The monthly billing data was added together to equal each customer's
total water usage and the total water usage per month.The monthly residential flow can is shown in Figure-
1. The total residential water use from September 2020 to September 2021 was 8,751,279 Gallons. The
month with the highest water usage was September 2021, with 864,460 gallons. The lowest month was
March 2021, with 558,523 gallons.
The total discharge per customer was divided by the total number of days over which the water
usage from the customer was recorded to equal their average flow per day. The average flow per day per
customer was 97.6 GPD. The maximum flow per day was 515.8 GPD, and the minimum was 1.5 GPD.
The average flow per day was used to calculate the average daily flow per bedroom by dividing the average
flow per day by the number of bedrooms for each residence.
The average daily flow per bedroom was 40.9 GPD. The maximum daily flow per bedroom was
257.9 GPD, and the minimum was 0.7 GPD. According to the Johnston County GIS, the Town Micro
currently has 113 three-bedroom houses, 67 two-bedroom houses, and 26 one-bedroom houses.
4 Final:
Municipal Engineering,Inc. /nE

TOWN OF MICRO I FLOW REDUCTION STUDY
RESIDENTIAL MICRO DISCHARGE
1000000
900000
800000
ZO 700000 r\oj
600000
500000
400000
O 300000
200000
100000
0
0 LO LO ,LO LN. L1 LN LN. LN. LN. .N tit LN
�eQ Oc �o� Oe� Nao <<e9 4;o QQ= 4\aJ ��o Ns, �� c4e9
MONTH
Figure 1-Residential Flow
3.1.3 MICRO NON-RESIDENTIAL FLOW
For non-residential flows, including commercial and institutional, each customer's name, address,
and monthly billing data were added to the spreadsheet. The monthly data per customer was then totaled
to obtain each customer's total water usage and the total water usage per month for all non-residential
customers.
The total water use for non-residential customers from September 2020 to September 2021 was
1,788,296 gallons. The month with the highest flow was September 2021, with 271,082 gallons, as shown
in Figure 2. The month with the least flow was July 2021, with 82,107 Gallons. The average flow per day
per non-residential customer was 167.7 GPD. The highest average flow per day was 1643.3 Gallons, and
the lowest average flow per day was 0.04 gallons.
5 Final:
Municipal Engineering,Inc. /RE
1

TOWN OF MICRO I FLOW REDUCTION STUDY
MICRO NON-RESIDENTIAL MONTHLY FLOW
300000
250000
p 200000
0 150000
100000
J
LL 50000
0
-cy- o& o N2' <(e4 C1`a� V `Sad N \ V- c,
MONTH
Figure 2- Non-Residential Flow
3.1.4 TOTAL MICRO FLOW
Micro's total water use was found by adding the residential data to the non-residential data. The
total flow from Micro from September 2020 to September 2021 was 10,539,575 gallons. The month with
the most significant total flow was September 2021,with 1,135,542 gallons. The month with the least flow
was March 2021, with 661,524 gallons, as shown in Figure 3.
TOTAL MICRO FLOW 2020-2021
1200000
1000000
z
0 800000
J
Cal 600000
cc
H 400000
Q
200000
0
MONTH
Figure 3- Micro Total Flow
6 Final:
Municipal Engineering,Inc. ®,

TOWN OF MICRO I FLOW REDUCTION STUDY
3.1.5 KENLY DATA
The Town of Kenly provided billing data for every month from February 2019 to September 2021.
Because Micro only provided data from September 2020 to September 2021,the data being analyzed from
Kenly will also fall between those months. From September 2020 to September 2021, Kenly's total water
usage was 12,716,115 gallons. The month with the highest flow was November 2020, with 1,901,007
gallons. The month with the lowest flow was December 2020, with 116,617 gallons, as shown in Figure 4.
The data was included since it was available and furnished to provide a snapshot of the Town of Micro's
Inflow/Infiltration.
TOTAL KENLY FLOW 2020-2021
2000000
1800000
I
1600000
600000
400000
200000
0
° ° ° ° N. N. N N. NN N N.
QL L ,L L oti ti ti cti J o \ Qti
5e00 �° cpa <(e4aPQ4,a ,.� .Jti ,s, c4e MONTH
Figure 4-Kenly Total Flow
3.1.6 COMPARISON OF KENLY AND MICRO
In Figure 3, Kenly's flow is compared to Micro's total flow. Kenly has a lower flow than Micro in
December 2020, May 2021, June 2021, and September 2021. We believe this to be an error in the meter
reading or an error in data recording. In Figure 5,the total discharge(residential flow)from Micro to Kenly
can be seen. The discharge from Micro to Kenly is found by subtracting Micro's industrial and commercial
flows from the total flow. Figure 6 shows the discharge from Micro compared to Kenly's flow.
7 Final:
Municipal Engineering,Inc. 0

TOWN OF MICRO I FLOW REDUCTION STUDY
MICRO VS KENLY 2020-2021
2000000
O 1500000
J
J
O 1000000
cc
W
Q So000o
3
0
MONTH
-Micro -Kenly
Figure 5-Micro vs. Kenly Flow
Micro Residential Discharge vs Kenly Flow
2000000
t 500000
0
eQ c,c oc e� at` e`o aA Q„ 2
1 oc NO o6 e9
5 O + O N Q ‘S` P �` N P �i
Month
Micro Residential -Kenly
Figure 6-Discharge vs. Kenly Flow
3.1.7 RAINFALL DATA
Rainfall data were collected from January 2019 to September 2021 using NOAA's Climate data
online tool. Because Micro only provided data from September 2020 to September 2021, the rain data
being analyzed will also fall between those months. The total amount of rain from September 2020 to
September 2021 was 67.58 inches. The month with the most rainfall was June 2021, with 11.88 inches.
The month with the least rain was September 2021, with 1.9 inches, as shown in Figure 7.
8 Final:
Municipal Engineering,Inc. 0

TOWN OF MICRO I FLOW REDUCTION STUDY
RAIN 2020-2021
14
12
N 10
u
8
6
4
2
0
yo yo ti° do ti'). titi ,yti ti� titi ti~ by titi titi
SeQ OC, °, ¢� ac (<ee 4,7§ ,z!:t
MONTH
Figure 7-Rain Data
3.1.8 RAINFALL VS FLOW
The rainfall data were compared to the Micro total flow data, Micro residential data, and Kenly
data, as seen in Figures 7 and 8.
MICRO VS RAIN DATA
1200000 14
z 1000000 12
O 800000 10 L.,
8 z
0 600000 6 _
w400000 4 Q
200000 2
0 0
'L° 19' 'L° 'L>' 1>' 51> tit' Lti 71> .,'Lti 'L~ ;1>
5eQ o�� �°, O` >a° <KV lac PQ �?" >,° >J %°% 5eQ
MONTH
Micro rain
Figure 8-Micro vs. Rainfall Data
9 Final:
Municipal Engineering,Inc. AlE

TOWN OF MICRO I FLOW REDUCTION STUDY
RAIN VS KENLY
2000000 14
in 12
ZO 1500000 10 4.
J
J $ u
(.'I 1000000 *11*
I ce
6
Q 500000 4 3
2
0 0
'10 ,O 'V ti0 N. 'l1 'V L'S N. L1 1y 1. '1,
Oec, Nac fie° 4,1; PQc 4,,sk 0* S�Q
MONTH
Kenly rain
Figure 9- KenlyFlow vs. Rain Data
g
4.0 CONCLUSION & RECOMMENDATIONS
4.1 CONCLUSIONS
Based on the data collected and analyzed,the average gallons per day/bedroom is 40.9 GPD,which
is well below the GPD/Bedroom stated in the North Carolina Administrative Code. Most of the existing
housing within the Micro service area was constructed well before 1995. The water closet alone would
(GPF) 6 (Vickers). Water closets are typically contributingto the
contribute 3.5 to 5-gallons-per-flush [ ] ( ) yp y
majority of flows from residential units. According to a paper entitled "Retrofitting Residential Fixtures—
Ultra Low Flow Toilet Program,"referenced on the NCDEQ website.
Presently there are plans to construct an 83-lot subdivision in Micro. The new subdivision will
consist of all 3-bedroom single-family dwellings. Based upon the current flow allocations found in the
NCAC,each house would contribute 360 GPD or 120 GPD/Bedroom. However, low flow fixtures are now
required based on the current NC Plumbing Code (Table 604-3). All new residential siphon-type water
closets are now required to utilize 1.6 gallons per flush. According to the above-referenced paper, the
reduction in water usage per household by at least 25%.
4.2 RECOMMENDATIONS
Based on the billing data collected, which shows 40.9 GPD/Bedroom, and the papers referenced as
5 and [6], we respectfully request a reduction of the flow per bedroom for new residential housing to 80-
10� � � � p Y q
Final:
Municipal Engineering,Inc. Eli)

TOWN OF MICRO I FLOW REDUCTION STUDY
GPD/Bedroom or bedroom 160-GPD/Bedroom minimum for one and two-bedroom dwellings. The
requested reduction would allocate 240-GPD per three-bedroom dwelling unit or a 33% reduction
The above reduction of 33.3%for each three-bedroom dwelling will be consistent with the sanitary
sewer service area outside the Town of Micro's extraterritorial jurisdiction (ETJ) served by Johnston
County Public Utilities (JCPU), which was granted the same requested reduction in 2005 (Appendix 3).
5.0 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT AND REFERENCES
5.1 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
We wish to acknowledge the following individuals for their assistance by providing advice and
the data necessary for this study:
Terra Collier, Town Clerk-Micro
Lisa Lee, Asst. Town Clerk-Micro
Sharon Evans, Asst. Manager/Town Clerk-Kenly
Kimberly Rineer, PE, Engineering Manager-JCPU
Jay Zimmerman, PG, Project Manager, ME
Brianna Osborne, Designer-ME
5.2 REFERENCES
[1] NCDEQ Division of Water Resources Local Water Supply Planning
https://www.ncwater.org/WUDC/app/LWSP/report.php?pwsid=03-51-045&year=2020
[2] National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA): Climate Data Online
https://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/cdo-web/datatools/findstation
[3] Johnston County Geographic Information Systems
https://www.johnstonnc.com/gis2/content.cfm?PD=searches
[4] Carolina Demography—University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
https://www.ncdemography.org/2019/10/24/where-are-ncs-fastest-growing-municipalities/
[5] Retrofitting Residential Fixtures—Ultra Low Flow Toilet Program
https://files.nc.gov/ncdeq/water%20Resources/files/planning/bmp/Retrofitting Residential_Fixtures =
Ultra Low-Flow Toilet Programs.pdf
[6] Handbook of Water Use and Conservation, Amy Vickers, Waterplow Press, May 2001.
11 Final:
Municipal Engineering,Inc. 0,

TOWN OF MICRO I FLOW REDUCTION STUDY
Appendix A
Paper
Retrofitting Residential Fixtures
12 Final:
Municipal Engineering,Inc. 0

Retrofitting Residential Fixtures - Ultra Low Flow Toilet Programs
Applicability
Water use by toilets is typically the largest source of indoor residential water demand,
averaging 26.7 percent of indoor water use (Vickers, 2001). The residential toilet
replacement program seeks to replace higher flush volume toilets with ultra-low flush
toilets that use 1.6 gallons per flush or less in order to decrease water use. These toilets
can either be installed directly by the utility, a contractor for the utility, or by the resident
or housing management.
This BMP is intended for a water system ("utility") that has at least 20 percent of its
homes and apartment units in its service area constructed prior to 1995, and for which
there has not been an active retrofit program to replace high flush volume toilets with
1.6 gallons per flush toilets, or Ultra Low Flow Toilets (ULFT). This BMP is often
implemented in conjunction with the Retrofitting Residential Fixtures — Showerhead,
Aerator, and Toilet Flapper Program BMP.
Description
ULFT replacement programs are an effective method of achieving water efficiency in
the residential sector. ULFTs are toilets that use 1.6 gallons per flush (gpf) or less
including dual flush toilets that can flush either 1.6 gpf or 0.8 to 1 gpf. Federal
requirements prohibit installation of new toilets using more than 1.6 gpf. Under this
BMP, the utility would develop and implement a program to replace existing toilets using
3.5 gpf or more in single-family and multi-family residences.
According to Vickers, successful toilet rebate and replacement programs must include:
• Identification of potential participants, potential water savings, program benefits
and costs, schedule, and program budget and human resource requirements.
• Program outreach and marketing strategies targeted to specific customer groups
and subgroups.
• Attractive financial incentives — a rebate, water bill credit, or fixture giveaway, for
example.
• Installation guidance (e.g. printed instructions, call-in technical assistance,
referrals to certified plumbers) or assistance (e.g. direct installation service,
particularly for the elderly and disabled).
• Purchasing information about 1.6 gpf toilets, such as a description of types
available for various applications, along with the names and model numbers of
fixtures reported to be reliable in consumer surveys and technical studies.
• Rebate application forms.
• A convenient inspection process.
• Timely rebate processing and payment.
• Evaluation and reporting of program results.
(Source: Water Use and Conservation, Amy Vickers, 2001, p. 42.)
January 15, 2013 30

Implementation
The ULFT replacement programs should offer free toilets or rebates for toilet
replacement. If offering rebates, the utility needs to provide a list of eligible toilet models
(i.e. WaterSense models). Incentives and promotion of the program should be sufficient
to retrofit at least five percent of eligible homes per year. In addition, ULFT models that
are used in retrofit programs should maintain 2 gpf or less, regardless of what
replacement flapper is used.
Identify the number of single-family and multi-family residences constructed prior to
1995. If there is no data of single-family homes existing at the end of 1994 readily
available, U.S. Census data can be used. For the most accurate estimate of single-
family and multi-family residents, census data from 1990 and 2000, which includes the
number of housing units by type, can be used. This data can be used to estimate single-
family units at the end of 1994, assuming linear growth. Refer to calculation box in the
Retrofitting Residential Fixtures - Showerhead, Aerator and Toilet Flapper Programs
BMP to estimate residences.
Schedule
In the first 12 months: Plan a program including customer involvement as needed.
Identify plumbing contractors or retrofit companies who may be interested in bidding on
this program if applicable. Develop a plan for educating homeowners, apartment owners
and managers, plumbers and realtors about the program. Solicit bids if using outside
contractors and initiate the program. Include inspections by utility personnel or a third
party to verify installation. In order to effectively implement this program, five percent of
eligible single-family homes and five percent of eligible multi-family units should be
retrofitted every year.
In the second year and after: Each year, target five percent of identified eligible single-
family homes and multi-family units to be retrofitted. Continue the program until 50
percent of eligible single-family homes and multi-family units are retrofitted in order to
achieve reasonable water efficiency benefits.
Scope
Annually, the ULFT replacement program should replace at least five percent of the
estimated number of eligible toilets within the service area.
In order to accomplish this BMP, the utility should:
• Develop and implement a plan to distribute or directly install high quality ULFTs
to eligible single-family and multi-family units;
• Implement the distribution or installation programs to achieve ULFT retrofits on at
least five percent of eligible single-family units and five percent of the multi-family
January 15, 2013 31

units each year. Utilities with more than 100,000 eligible connections should
retrofit at least 5,000 eligible homes and units each year.
• Within 10 years of implementing the program, retrofit at least 50 percent of
eligible single-family homes and multi-family units with ULFTs. For utilities with
more than 100,000 eligible connections, at least 50,000 eligible homes and units
should be retrofitted within 10 years.
Documentation
To track this BMP, the utility should collect the following information:
• The eligible number of single-family residences and multi-family units in the
service area.
• The average number of toilets per single-family residence; the average number
of toilets per multi-family unit.
• The average persons per household for single-family residences; the average
persons per household for multi-family units.
• The number of ULFT installations credited to the replacement program, by year,
including brand and model of toilets installed.
• A description of the ULFT replacement program, if applicable.
• The estimated cost per ULFT replacement, if applicable.
• The estimated water savings per ULFT replacement.
Determination of Water Savings
Average Daily Savings = SF x ((10.5 x Hs)/Ts) + MF x ((10.5 xHm)/Tm)
SF= Number of SF toilets retrofitted
MF = Number of MF toilets retrofitted
Hs = Number of people in average single family household
Ts = Average number of toilets per SF house
Tm = Average number of toilet per MF unit
For Single-family homes:
10.5 = gallons saved per capita per day if all toilets replaced in each household
Dual flush ULFTs increases savings by 25 percent
For Multi-Family Units:
10.5 = gallons saved per capita per day if all toilets replaced in each unit
Dual flush ULFTs increase savings by 25 percent
V
January 15, 2013 32

Cost-effectiveness
The rebates to the customers for installation of ULFT toilets are the most significant
costs of this program. If the rebate cost for the toilet is set too low, only those customers
already planning to retrofit will do so. If the rebate is set too high, the utility will be
overpaying for customers to retrofit. Most utilities have found a rebate to work effectively
if set between $70 and $100. Some utilities find it is more effective to provide the toilets
free of charge to their customers. Toilets can be purchased from wholesalers by the
truckload for $50 to $70. There may be additional costs for storage and distribution of
the toilets.
Administration of the program can be conducted by utility staff or contracted out. There
will be labor costs for application processing and inspections to verify installation, to
determine if the tank is properly set and to discourage fraud. Inspection costs will be
lower per toilet per multi-family retrofit due to the higher volume of toilets per
application, but generally, labor costs range from $10 to $40 per toilet. Marketing and
outreach range from $5 to $20 per toilet. Administrative and overhead costs range from
10 percent to 20 percent of labor costs. If this program is combined with the
showerhead, aerator, and flapper retrofit BMP, there will be efficiencies in these costs.
To calculate the total cost per unit, total all costs and divide by the number of units
being retrofitted.
For comments or questions regarding the Retrofitting Residential Ultra Low Flow Toilets
BMP, please contact the water efficiency specialist of the Water Supply Planning
Branch at 919-707-9009.
References:
• Handbook of Water Use and Conservation, Amy Vickers, Waterplow Press, May
2001.
• Tampa Bay Water Potable Water Conservation BMPs, January 2010.
• Texas Water Development Board Report 362, Water Conservation Best
Management Practices Guide, November 2004.
I
January 15, 2013 33

TOWN OF MICRO I FLOW REDUCTION STUDY
Appendix B
Micro Local Water Supply Plan
13 Final:
Municipal Engineering,Inc. /DE

Micro 2020
The Division of Water Resources(DWR)provides the data contained within this Local Water Supply Plan(LWSP)as a courtesy and service to our
customers.DWR staff does not field verify data.Neither DWR,nor any other party involved in the preparation of this LWSP attests that the data is
completely free of errors and omissions.Furthermore,data users are cautioned that LWSPs labeled PROVISIONAL have yet to be reviewed by DWR
staff.Subsequent review may result in significant revision.Questions regarding the accuracy or limitations of usage of this data should be directed to the
water system and/or DWR.
1. System Information
�;byyt�ad'.$laa?t��i'9i23tic'v
Water System Name: Micro PWSID: 03-51-045 Complete
Mailing Address: PO BOX 56 Ownership: Municipality
Micro,NC 27555
Contact Person: Johnny Dixon Title: Public Works Director
Phone: [phone] Cell/Mobile: --
liStriibtiiior :`y :5tc'i7a
Line Type Size Range(Inches) Estimated%of lines
Asbestos Cement 3-8 55.00%
Cast Iron 4-8 15.00%
Ductile Iron 4-8 5.00%
Galvanized Iron 1-2 10.00%
Polyvinyl Chloride 2-8 15.00%
What are the estimated total miles of distribution system lines? 5 Miles
How many feet of distribution lines were replaced during 2020? 0 Feet
How many feet of new water mains were added during 2020? 0 Feet
How many meters were replaced in 2020? 4
How old are the oldest meters in this system? 2 Year(s)
How many meters for outdoor water use,such as irrigation,are not billed for sewer services? 0
What is this system's finished water storage capacity? 0.1000 Million Gallons
Has water pressure been inadequate in any part of the system since last update?Line breaks that were repaired quickly should not be included. No
Does this system have a program to work or flush hydrants? Yes,Semi-Annually
Does this system have a valve exercise program? No
Does this system have a cross-connection program? No
Does this system have a program to replace meters? No
Does this system have a plumbing retrofit program? No
Does this system have an active water conservation public education program? Yes
Does this system have a leak detection program? Yes
Wnt.or Cones,ation
What type of rate structure is used? Flat/Fixed,Increasing Block
How much reclaimed water does this system use? 0.0000 MGD For how many connections? 0

' Does this system have an interconnection with another system capable of providing water in an emergency? Yes
2. Water Use Information
Sub-Basin(s) %of Service Population County(s) %of Service Population
Neuse River(10-1) 100% Johnston 100%
What was the year-round population served in 2020? 460
Has this system acquired another system since last report? No
a'l,)Rei tl s;? `f Typo
Type of Use Metered Metered Non-Metered Non-Metered
Connections Average Use(MGD) Connections Estimated Use(MGD)
Residential 260 0.0230 0 0.0000
Commercial 20 0.0010 0 0.0000
Industrial 0 0.0000 0 0.0000
Institutional 10 0.0090 0 0.0000
How much water was used for system processes(backwash,line cleaning,flushing,etc.)? 0.0010 MGD
3. Water Supply Sources
Nic,iroo.hiv liviithdrAtifi.,k,, ai +:iiEvw::,
Average Daily Max Day Average Daily Max Day Average Daily Max Day
Use(MGD) Use(MGD) Use(MGD) Use(MGD) Use(MGD) Use(MGD)
Jan 0.0370 May 0.0430 Sep 0.0290
Feb 0.0350 Jun 0.0310 Oct 0.0320
Mar 0.0440 Jul 0.0310 Nov 0.0340
Apr 0.0310 Aug 0.0400 Dec 0.0300
;11
C.rs.mrd tiktat u fioaBArce:
Average Daily Withdrawal 12-Hour
Name or (MGD) Max Day Withdrawal Su I CUA Year Use Type
Number (MGD) (MGD) Reduction Offline yp
MGD Days Used
WELL#1 0.0170 365 0.0550 Regular
WELL#3 0.0190 365 0.1200 Regular
r%rokaaid State ar a (s ontintl ti)
Casing Depth Screen Depth(Feet)
Name or Number Well Depth(Feet) (Feet) Well Diameter(Inches) Pump Intake Depth(Feet) Metered?
Top Bottom
WELL#1 210 90 0 0 6 190 Yes
WELL#3 340 90 0 0 6 190 Yes
Are ground water levels monitored? Yes,Weekly
Does this system have a wellhead protection program? Yes
Wz1S"w Ptivii ha3 From Other 3yitea
Average Days Contract Required to Pipe Size(s) Use
Seller PWSID Daily Purchased comply with water
Used (Inches) Type
(MGD) MGD Expiration Recurring use restrictions?
JOHNSTON 03-51-070 0.0000 Yes Yes 16 Emergency
4. Wastewater Information

i.i(1,s4lil!,;,li-,hf;)u Fy::_'.
Average Daily Average Daily Average Daily
Discharge(MGD) Discharge(MGD) Discharge(MGD)
Jan 0.0330 May 0.0280 Sep 0.0290
Feb 0.0340 Jun 0.0310 Oct 0.0340
Mar 0.0340 Jul 0.0290 Nov 0.0640
Apr 0.0290 Aug 0.0290 Dec 0.0040
Micro's 2020 Monthly Discharges
1 -
e IN Avg Daily
t7
r
0
0
v
a
in
c
a
m
t7
c
a
7 0 IIIIMINIiinillmiew
How many sewer connections does this system have? 278
How many water service connections with septic systems does this system have? 24
Are there plans to build or expand wastewater treatment facilities in the next 10 years? No
Irk1:110;wuiC".a loot,h'f:oili3fifshi,
Average Daily Amount Contract
Water System PWSID Type
MGD Days Used Maximum(MGD)
Kenly 03-51-030 Discharging 0.0310 366 0.0000
5. Planning
fto o..ii.ar"es
2020 2030 2040 2050 2060 2070
Year-Round Population 460 629 816 1,059 1,375 1,740
Seasonal Population 0 0 0 0 0 0
Residential 0.0230 0.0371 0,0481 0.0625 0.0811 0.1027
Commercial 0.0010 0.0013 0.0017 0.0022 0.0029 0.0037
Industrial 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Institutional 0.0090 0.0100 0.0120 0.0144 0.0173 0.0207
System Process 0.0010 0.0011 0.0012 0.0013 0.0014 0.0015
Unaccounted-for 0.0019 0.0024 0.0026 0.0028 0.0030 0.0032
ilernririilids Fcr{e R43e" eataf?I„
2020 2030 2040 2050 2060 2070
Surface Water Supply 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Ground Water Supply 0.1750 0.1750 0.1750 0.1750 0.1750 0.1750
Purchases 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Future Supplies 0.0000 0.0000 0,0000 0.0000 0.0000
Total Available Supply(MGD) 0.1750 0.1750 0.1750 0.1750 0.1750 0.1750
Service Area Demand 0.0359 0.0519 0.0656 0.0832 0.1057 0.1318

Sales 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Future Sales 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Total Demand(MGD) 0.0359 0.0519 0.0656 0.0832 0.1057 0.1318
Demand as Percent of Supply 21% 30% 37% 48% 60% 75%
:i
The purpose of the above chart is to show a general indication of how the long-term per capita water demand changes over time.The per capita water demand
may actually be different than indicated due to seasonal populations and the accuracy of data submitted.Water systems that have calculated long-term per
capita water demand based on a methodology that produces different results may submit their information in the notes field.
Your long-term water demand is 50 gallons per capita per day.What demand management practices do you plan to implement to reduce the per capita water
demand(i.e.conduct regular water audits,implement a plumbing retrofit program,employ practices such as rainwater harvesting or reclaimed water)?If these
practices are covered elsewhere in your plan,indicate where the practices are discussed here.
Are there other demand management practices you will implement to reduce your future supply needs?
What supplies other than the ones listed in future supplies are being considered to meet your future supply needs?
How does the water system intend to implement the demand management and supply planning components above?
Has this system participated in regional water supply or water use planning? No
What major water supply reports or studies were used for planning?
Please describe any other needs or issues regarding your water supply sources,any water system deficiencies or needed improvements(storage,treatment,
etc.)or your ability to meet present and future water needs.Include both quantity and quality considerations,as well as financial,technical,managerial,
permitting,and compliance issues:
The Division of Water Resources(DWR)provides the data contained within this Local Water Supply Plan(LWSP)as a courtesy and service to our
customers.DWR staff does not field verify data.Neither DWR,nor any other party involved in the preparation of this LWSP attests that the data is
completely free of errors and omissions.Furthermore,data users are cautioned that LWSPs labeled PROVISIONAL have yet to be reviewed by DWR
staff.Subsequent review may result in significant revision.Questions regarding the accuracy or limitations of usage of this data should be directed to the
water system and/or DWR.

TOWN OF MICRO I FLOW REDUCTION STUDY
Appendix C
Johnston County Public Utilities
Residential Flow Reduction Approval Letter
14 Final:
Municipal Engineering,Inc. AIE

1
`�OF WATF9pG Michael F.Easley,Governor 6
o
William G.Ross Jr.,Secretary p
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources P
II
p -. Alan W.Klimek,P.E.,Director
Division of Water Quality i
1
.
May 18, 2005 1
Timothy Broome, PE, Director of Infrastructure and Engineering
Johnston County Public Utilities
PO Box 2263 r
Smithfield, NC 27577
• Subject: Johnston County li
Residential Flow Reduction Approval t
Johnston County
Dear Mr. Broome: ii
i
On February 22, 2005, the Division of Water Quality received a flow reduction request for. 1
residences in Johnston County. The letter requests an allowable flow rate of 80 GPD per residential
bedroom based on the evaluated data for three similar existing subdivisions,
The water use data provided between November 2003 and October 2004 with daily readings
taken during November 2004 was analyzed by central office and regional office staff with additional i
information requested. Based upon this data and the County response to our additional information t
requests, the Division hereby approves the use of 80 GPD per residential bedroom,with a minimum 1
of 160 gpd for one and two bedroom units in all applicable non-discharge permit applications.
Flow shall be incremented by 80/gpd for each bedroom above two.,Regardless of the adjusted f
design daily wastewater flow rate, at no time shall the wastewater flows exceed the effluent limits 4
defined in the NPDES permit for the treatment facility or exceed the capacity of the sewers
downstream of any new sewer extension or service connection(s). A permit modification and fee is
required to apply this flow reduction to any existing permits where flows have been allocated. il
1
If you have any questions or comments regarding this matter, please contact Marie Doklovic
at(919)733-5083 ext. 371. •
Sincerely,
r°
,�K Alan W. Klimek, P.E.
cc: Ken Schuster, Raleigh Regional Office 11
Barry Herzberg, Raleigh Regional Office
•
Mark McIntire, NPDES East Program I
Kimberly Rineer, PE, Johnston County Public Utilities 1,1
PERCS Flow Reduction File
1
I
One Pretreatment,Emergency Response and Collection Systems Unit Internet http://h2o.enr.nc.state.us/ndpu
NorthCarohna 1617 Mail Service Center,Raleigh,NC 27699-1617 An Equal Opportunity Action Employer II
Naturally Telephone [phone] Fax [phone] 50%recycled/10%post-consumer paper
P.
1
1

TOWN OF MICRO I FLOW REDUCTION STUDY
Appendix D
Residential Flow Data
15 Final:
Municipal Engineering,Inc. Al

Town of Micro
Residential
Sanitary Sewer Flows
ADDRESS/DATE Sep-20 Oct-20 Nov-20 Dec-20'Jan-21 Feb-21 Mar-21 Apr-21 May-21 Jun-21 Jul-21 Aug-21 Sep-21 Total AVG GPO BEDS Avg daily flow/bed NAMES 3 beds 2 beds 1 bed
101 B N DAVIS ST 2,010 3,353 2,657 2,466 3,253 2,420 2,500 2,367 2,215 2,677 , 1,890 2,303 2,828 32,939 83.4 3 27.8 Y-_ COY STANLEY 1 0 0
101 DWIGHT DR 1,240 1,506 1,136 904 464 838 822 852 1,047 988 819 942 772 12,330 31.2 3 10.4 JAMIE MCCRAY 1 0 0
101 E WILSON ST 1,660 1,859 1,590 1,992 1,926 1,630 1,391 1,748 1,785 3,529 1,604 2,517 5,345 28,576 72.3 2 36.2 NINA P.DAVIS -_- 0 1 0
101 FIELD ST 170 550 1,178 168 623 245 519 996 T9,121 12,313 2,014 1,183 42,373 71,453 180.9 2 - 90.4 RUSSELL CREECH 0 1 0
101 GERI ST , 4,120 4,082 3,075 2,776 3,106 3,088 2,861 2,820 2,819 3,530 3,546_3,318 7,041 46,182 116.9 3 39.0 DONNELL AND LELIA SHERROD -10 0
101 HINNANT ST 1,400 1,600 1,633 1,294 1,391 1,230 1,356 1,560 1,514 1,354 1,189 1,377 1,645 18,543 46.9 2 23.5 --�-� WANDA BARBER 0 1 0
101 N DAVIS ST 1 500 11,975 2,538 2641 1591 1420 1152 1454 4,306 3,766 870 1,340 1,981 2653467.2 3 22.4 _-_..- CHARUE YOUNG 1 0 0
,�--_ 101 PITTMAN LN�------ 11650 2,100`1,764 1,466_11942�/321. 2,255 2,1%_31152_ 5,263__ 6,874�2,618-_-21491 ---39,092---- --_99.0 4 24.7 WILBERT SIMS 0--_�0 .--0---
-- 101 S DAVIS ST 0 0 0 0 0 338 597 566 674 584 557 774 757 41847 12.3 3 4.1 -_--__ 1 C MUNOZ .,. .---`1-�_--0 _-0 -
101 SECOND ST __----1,330 1_217 1,561 -1y219 -11951 1,547 2,605 11-590 2,930 3173_ 1,799 2,235 _5270 -- 26,427 66.9 3 22.3 REBECCA BARTZ -__ _---�1 0 0
101 W FAYETTEVILLE _1,370 1,642 2,424 1,321 2,091 2,340 1284 1,793 11582 1,935 1,304 5,384 1,859 26,329 66.7 3 22.2 _ NANCY HINTON 1 0 0
102 A W GOLDSBORO ST 1,640 2,040 1,498 2,213 2,917 1,809 1,489 2,281 1,749 2,315 2,143 1,609 2,231 25,934 65.7 3 21.9 RICHARD ARMSTRONG JR_ 1 0 0
102 B WEST GOLDSBORO ST 7,810 2,810 2,657 2,858 2,945 2,036 2,171 2,726 4,375 3,605 1,934 1,664 3,422 41,013 103.8 3 34.6 MIKE AND DEANNA MINICK 1 0 0
102 C W GOLDSBORO ST 1,800 2,134 1,934 1,287 1,479 1,883 1,512 1,518 2,456 1,549 1,039 1,210 1,626 21,427 54.2 3 18.1 AMBERLY SMITH 1 0 0
102 D W GOLDBORO ST 2,310 2,749 2,242 2,076 2,723 2,460 2,161 2,745 2,416 2,506 2,358 2,660 2,787 32,193 81.5 3 27.2 DONNELL CEGERS AND SONYA HINES 1 0 0
102 DAVIS ST B 1,880 2,812 3,915 2,732 2,183 1,662 2,214 2,326 5,702 3,784 3,800_5_473 7,373 45,856 116.1 3 38.7 - KEVIN WORLEY 1 0 0
102 DWIGHT DR 5,020 6,968 5,831 6,670 7,386 5,532 5,101 6,241 5,705 6,345 5,161 6,555 5,938 78,453 198.6 4 49.7 JENNIFER RUNYPN 0 0 0
102 E WILSON ST 1,590 1,794 1,623 1,615 1,916 1,697 1,582 1,753 1,646 1,867 1,204 1,598 2,047 21,932 55.5 3 18.5 BILLY WORLEY __ 1 0 0
102 FIELDS ST 5,470 2,840 1,617 1,359 1,818 1,810 1,553 1,555 6,739 39,089 23,638 1,631 1,816 90,935 230.2 2 115.1 .-.�� TERRY TURNER 0 1 0
-_�- 102 GERRI ST 1,280 874 339 412 1,030 996 258 310 240 471 143 572 3,080 10,005 25.3 3 ��- 8.4 DANA STRICKLAND -�-� 1 0 0
102 N DAVIS ST 660 823 946 1,095 824 810 702 891 941 974 651 985 891 11,193 28.3 3 9.4 BARBARA WORLEY 1 0 0
------_102 SECOND ST_-� 2,410 2,340 2,233_2,474 11616 2,522 21-144-��21-503 962 2,4662,173-_-1,490 21289,-�-27,622-_--Y-699 4 17.5 JOHN SCHULLERY 0 0 0
102 W WILSON ST 2,080 13,504 10,181 648 1,082 612 614 757 636 _11228 624 688 698_�-33.352 84.4 3 28.1 LINDA DAVIS 1 0 0
103 DWIGHT DR___3,520 6,429 5,948 5,885 7,158 5,951 6,764 7,451 11,454 14,211 6,580 2,667 0 84,018 212.7 2 106.4 _ JOYCE BEASLEY 0 1 0
103 E FAYETTEVILLE ST 370 1,872 8,402 391 403 308 460 394 343 398 1,442 2,193 2,053 19,029 48.2 3 16.1 YATES POOLE -_ 1 0 0
103 E WILSON ST 3,050 2,334 2,297 4,239 3,541 1,237 1,272 1,455 1,510 5,049 2,321 1,653 2,173 32,131 81.3 3 27.1 DEBORAH HAMMANN 1 0 0
103 GERRI ST 2,630 3,009 2,747 2,551 3,219 2,709 3,583 2,894 2,507 3,100 2,446 2,773 3,165 37,333 94.5 3 31.5 JOHNNIE HARRIS 1 0 0
103 HINNANT ST 340 373 319 201 238 268 185 228 236 260 293 431 20,236 23,608 59.8 3 19.9 CONNIE BOYETTE 1 0 0
103 N DAVIS ST 4,050 3,658 3,834 2,728 3,911 2,995 2,876 2,797 1,976 2,458 1,906 1,937 2,494 37,620 95.2 2 47.6 _* MARTY PARNELL 0 1 0
103 PITTMAN LANE 1,230 1,174 1,097 1,037 1,197 1,039 1,007 1,203 1,949 2,175 1,103 1,275 1,608 17,094 43.3 4 10.8 - DORIS SIMS 0 0 0
103 S DAVIS ST 2,600 2,217 4,581 4,716 3,961 2,185 2,199 2,713 2,070 2,561 2,139 1,555 2,565 36,062 91.3 3 30.4 ANNIE THOMPSON 1 0 0
103 SECOND ST 2,650 3,123 2,932_2 653 3,004 2,542 2,659 3,764 4,190 5,560 2,527 2,239 3,253 41,096 104.0 2 ^ 52.0 CHARLES AND KAREN FASOLINO 0 1 0
103 W FAYETTEVILLE ST 2,220 2,728 2,4430_2,053,2,311 2,034 1,917 2,425 2-1276 6,832 1,981 2,791 4396 3 6,394---y-_ 9221 3 30.7 ---�_-�T MIGUEL ANGEL REYES 1 0 0�
___ 103 W WILSON ST_ 890 1,416__1,094__1L003 -11239 _1,527 .425-_--885^-11399 _11352_-1,0044 662 1,091 15 027 38.0 3__ _12.7 PATSY VANN 1 0 0
1033 OAK GROVE INN RD__2,860 66,7877 2,841 3,559 4,419 4,570 6,179 3,036 2,643 3,279 3,208 3,704 9,714 56,799 143.8 3 ^��� 47.9 ._� LLOYD HOLLOMAN 1 0 0_
104 A W FAYETTEVILLE ST 3,380 3,6602 3,310 3,2495675 3,255 3,063 3,5793,683 3581 .3,201 3,963Y 4,540 46,081 116.7 3 38.9 ANNSAVON WILLIAMS 1 0_ 0
104 8 W FAYETTEVILLE ST 1770 1,414 2,253 1,095 2,190 1,764 1,854 1,910 2,254 1,740 2,789 2,916 3,501 27,450 69.5 3 23.2 DANA MOORE 1 0 0
104 DWIGHT DR . 1,070 550 551 487 625 730 1,693 405 197 76 54 31 236 6,705 17.0 3 5.7 DOROTHY DUNN 1 0 0
104 E WILSON ST 1,110 2,179 1,380 1,242 1,581 1,469 1,003 1,424 1,124 1,292 1,112 1,291 1,661 17,868 45.2 3 15.1 CAROLYN LEE 1 0 0
104 FIELD ST 1,660 1,972 1,774 2,074 2,087 1,987 1,797 2,236 7,249 2,006 1,722 2,148 2,315 31,027 78.5 3 26.2 MICHELLE HOLLOWAY 1 0 0
104 GERRI ST 5,370 4,935 4,403 4,556 4,105 4,177 4,321 5,199 4,872 0 1,676 1,396 1,480 46,490 117.7 3 39.2 JOHN AND ASHLEIGH ANDERSON 1 0 0
104 S DAVIS ST 1,750 1,645 1,231 0 0 0 0 0 0 900 3,851 4,866 6,160 20,403 51.7 3 17.2 TIMOTHY HORNE 1 0 0
104 US 301 SOUTH 2,920 3,485 2,677 2,916 2,769 3,030 3,479 3,882 3,980 4,350 3,084 3,467 3,848 43,887 111.1 3 37.0 DIANE MESSER 1 0 0
104 W GOLDSBOROR ST 4,790 4,545 4,714 4,220 5,229 4,631 4,791 4,979 4,809 5,186 5,172 6,076 5,761 64,903 164.3 3 54.8 JESSE LAMB 1 0 0
104 W WILSON ST 0 0 0 0---_._ 0 0 0 0 0 0 332 4,149 3,558 8,039 204 3 6.8 MARY ANN WARREN 1 0 0
-� 105 DWIGHT DR 4,900 5,865 5,071 4409 4,918 44_508 4,577 5,555 5,050 61087 4,88315,1466312 67229 170_2 3 56.7 --�.STEVE WILSON -�- 1 0 0
105 E FAYETTEVILLE ST 1,010 1,145 1,335 1,026 1,319 1,126 916 830 847 ` 970 1E8 1,651 1,909 15,302---�-�38.2 2 19.1 MARYLIN LEE-_- 0 1 0
---� 105 E GOLDSBORO 400 -- 39 23 58 31 3 3 1 5 5 0 5_-_-- 6 579 1.5 2 0.7 DEANNA JERNIGAN --W 0 1 0
105 E MAIN ST 5,160 5,993 5,613 5,450 6,133 5,867 5,399 7,441 7,102- 6,473 _ 5,447 5,073 5,519 76,670 194.1 2 97.1 GARY EVANS 0 1 0
105 SECOND ST 3,970 5,814 4,163 3001 4,049 4,215 3,597 3,411 2,982 3,994 2,531 2,784 3,536 48,047 121.6 2 60.8 WALTER POWELL 0 1 0
105 W FAYETTEVILLE ST 1,350 79 519 0 38 781 407 3,384 4,010 4,989 2,704 5,526 5,778 29,565 74.8 3 24.9 MARIAN HAIL 1 0 0
106 W FAYTTEVILLE ST 660 1 192 920 967 1,165 1,011 677 920 726 1,152 1,218 1,013 1,150 12,771 32.3 2 16.2 _ DONNA A.BAKER 0 1 0
106 DWIGHT DR 2,480 3,022 2,784 2,384 2,918 2,833 2,485 2,662 2,469 2,585 1,984 3,073 2,640 34,319 86.9 3 29.0 TIM EARP 1 0 0
106E GOLDSBORO 3,610 4,298 3,508 1,515 3,028 2,365 1,867 2,236 1,983 3,399 3,481 3,633 5,240 40,163 101.7 3 33.9 RUSSELL CREECH 1 0 0
106 E WILSON ST 2,220 2,464 2,594 2,823 2,880 2,830 2,164 2,345 2,222 2,633 1,833 2,408 3,139 32,555 82.4 2 41.2 MAYRA REYES 0 1 0
106 S US 301 HWY 3,660 5,386 9241 21,688 3,706 3,038 3,442 3,678 3,251 4,535 3,628 6,177 3,800 75,230 190.5 2 95.2 - PAULA URQUIDI 0 1 0
106 W GOLDSBORO ST 960 1,293 1,070 1,275 1,274 996 965 1,381 2,238 1,741 1,817 1,188 1,193 12291 44.0 3 14.7 JANICE PATE 1 0 0
107 DWIGHT DR_ 4,080 4,905 4,756 4,522 4,730 41108 3,530 .1328 5,035 41914 4,201 4,252 41255 _59,216 149.9 3 50.0 SHANNON RAY 1 0 0�
-�107 E GOLDSBORO ST 4,690 4,803 5,210 4-1,33341956 6988 9197214,4765,189__51064-_-3-1973 4,594 Sy841 _79189--�- 200.5 3 66.8 ERIC AND SHEILA CHRISTIANSEN------_1 0 0
307E MAIN ST 4230 1,734 1,493-_-11409 1,630 4275 ;244 4820-�--519 59 0 0 508 12,921--^--.32.7 3 10.9-��- WAYNE EVANS 1 0 0
--_-�107 US 301 N�-_�- 3450 3-1731-_-3228-_-33 271 0 0 0 0 0 0_ 0 0 0 13,680 34.6---�_3 -W__ 11.5 KATHY COUNCEL 1 0 0
108 S US HWY 301 3,540 4,689 4,356 3,671 7,038 4,323 3,841 3,558 3,262 4,068 6,656 6,650 3,971 59,623 150.9 2 75.5 J9IS RAY 0 1 0 _
108 DWIGHT DR 2,220 2,045 1,860 3,154 3,425 1,931 2,874 2,799 2,685 4,554 3,850 3,727 2,125 37,249 94.3 3 31.4 BILLY BRITT -�-�-1 0 0

Town of Mao
Residential
Sankary Sewer Flows
ADDRESS/DATE Sep-2O Oct-20 Nov-20 Dec-20 Jan-21 Feb-21 Mar-21 Apr-21 May-21 Jun-21 Jul-21 Aug-21 Sep-21 Total AVG GPD BEDS Avg daily flow/bed NAMES 3 beds 2 beds 1 bed
108 E MAIN ST 1010 1,015 1,081 876 1,035 1,019 852 1,107 980 1,107 652 594 1,170 _11498 31.6 2 15.8 - LINDA HALES 0 1 0
108 W GOLDSBOROR ST 1,470 1,597 1,348 1,234 1,045 1,295 998 1,158 1,824 1,966 1,427 1,629 1,400 18,391 46.6 3 15.5 KATHY REITZEL 1 0 0
109 A DWIGHT DR 90 13 24 12 1,244 1,280 1,044 1,280 1,317 53 31 227 50 6,665 16.9 4 4.2 __--, TERESA DAUGHTRY 0 0 0
109 B DWIGHT DR 1,310 142 1,004 988 1,124 1,309 1,327 1,351 1,181 1,408 1,270 1,789 1,124 15,327 38.8 4 9.7 SHAKARI WOOD 0 0 0
109 C DWIGHT DRIVE 880 _ 2,084 4,566 3,364 3,377 3,362 3,513 3,340 3,111 3,792 3,541 3,832 4,308 43,070 109.0 4 27.3 MATT PRICE JR 0 0 0
109 E MAIN ST 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4,050 4,869 8,919 22.6 3 7.5 LADARRIS HOUP 1 _ 0 0
109 US 301 N 2,610 3,222 3,071 2,917 3,107 2,881 2,803 3,406 2,736 2,500 2,952 2,836 2,763 37,804 95.7 3 31.9 LESLIE WALL JR.
1 0 0
1092 OAK GROVE INN RD 5,390 17,301 49,609 80,931 47,769 381 309 1,021 160 260 168 182 248 203,729 515.8 2 257.9 BILLY MOORE 0 _--1 0
110 DWIGHT DR 5,840,7282 6,451 6,019 9,973 5331 4,004 5,355 4,378 1488 405 5,549 6,928 77,393 195.9 3 65_3 APRIL HALL 1 __ 0 - 0
130E MAIN ST 900 1,328 3,314 1,963 1,853 2594 1682 1,714 1,012 795 607 639 944 19,345 49.0 3 __ 16.3 UNDA WOODRUFF 1 0 0
1101 OAK ROVE INN RD 1,540 2,140_1,8829 1,849 1,900 1,682 2,021_--21260 3,0013,034__-1,5801,999 2,686 281121 _--�71.2 3 23.7 TIMOTHY BOURQUE 1 0 0
111 DWIGHT DR 2,100 4,711 5,265 3,788 5,781 4,224 ^41614 5,087 5170 6453_ 1,6471,640 0 »-_501480_ 127.8 3 ---_42.6 -_-_�KEVIN MOZINGO 1 0 0
111 E FAYETTEVILLE S_T__ 2,120 2,169_1,885 1,873 2,037 1,913 2,153 2,222 0 0 0 0 0 .._16i372 41A 2 20.7 ELIZABETH RIDLEY 0 1 0
111 E MAIN ST -3 720 5,704 5,577 4,799 3,527 5,095 4,491 3,658 3,421 2,851 3,349 3,193 3,406 52,791 133.6 2 66.8 YY DEBORA HOUSE 0 1 0
111 JOHNSON FARM LANE 3,090 3,117 2,729 2,446 2,751 2,717 1,165 1,023 677 703 538 590 1,098 22,644 57.3 3 19.1 JAMES COLE 1 0 0
112 DWIGHT DR 2,730 3,001 2,704 2,524 2,728 3,180 3,250 3,370 2,983 2,448 2,036 2,307 2,964 36,225 91.7 4 22.9 SHIRLEY GIBBONS 0 0 0
112 E MAIN ST 670 798 649 2,727 693 922 997 2,460 708 772 688 590 830 13,504 34.2 2 17.1 BROOKE CREECH 0 1 0
113 DWIGHT DR 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18,048 4,654 4,467 4,954 32,123 81.3 3 27.1 BENNY LANGSTON 1 0 0
113 E FAYETTEVILLE ST 1,650 2,309 2,165 1,979 2,246 2,126 1,773 2,264 1,803 2,308 692 1,149 3,488 25,952 65.7 3 21.9 MARK POOLE 1 0 0
.__. 113 E MAIN ST 5,080 31,680 8,108 4,117 4,660 4,098 3,947 6,996 8,513 9,264 6,976 6,315 9,175 108,929 275.8 3 91.9 VIRGIL ALLEN 1 0 0
114 DWIGHT DR 3,990 7,499 3,873 4,933 5,060 3,943 0 5,817 1,001 1,940 1,716 1,782 2,069 43,623 110.4 3 36.8 SHANNON HAMILTON 1 0 0V
�_--_116 DWIGHT DR 2820 3,234 3,765 2,833 2,135 2810 44497,201.__3308_4,312_ 2,7243_647 41429 471667 120.7 3 40.2 VERNON WOODWARD 1 0 0
118 DWIGHT DR 1,290 1611 1 645 1_345 1,524 11290 1y353 11,629 11727 _1L957 1441 1,619 12.07 20137 51.0 3 17.0 FRANKIE PARRISH 1 0 0
120 DWIGHT DR 40 24 21 30 82 106 66 28 42 82 109 663 1,015 2,308 5.8 2 2.9 ROBERT HALE 0 1 0
122 DWIGHT DR 500 1,131 1,106 823 1,192 _1y546 11_446 11631 1,303 1481 1064 4,579 2,576 20,378 51.6 3 17.2 SHARON ATKINSON 1 0 0
124 DWIGHT DR 1,640 1,817 1,808 1,727 1,650 1738 1,496 1,600 2,089 4_1157 897 782 _2,892 _ 24,293 61.5 3 20.5 BRENDA BENSON 1 0 0
126 DWIGHT DR 1,060 1,037 982 1,238 968 966 818 888 863 848 1,045 760 833 12,306 31.2 3 10.4 - JOSE JOSE GOMEZ �1 0 0
128 BALLPARK RD 2,910 3,473 3,291 3,296 3,724 3,147 3,062 4,075 9,583 3,412 9,851 4,702 16,867 71,393 180.7 2 90.4 KIMBERLY MONTGOMERY 0 1 0
128 DWIGHT DRIVE 3,710 4,812 28,007 3,126 4,268 3,210 3,447 4,602 4,115 4,186 3,514 3,929 4,524 75,450 191.0 3 63.7 CORAL AND MITCHELL HURLEY 1 0 0
180 EWING DR 4,320 4,067 4,866 4,988 4,887 4,425 4,543 3,717 2,232 1,745 1,641 2,800 4,535 48,766 123.5 3 41.2 MICHALE ANTOSZEWKSI 1 0 0
181 EWING DR 4,250 4,471 6,474 5,935 6,458 5,583 5,745 7,053 5,993 8,492 4,643 3,514 4,584 73,195 185.3 3 61.8 - LAWRENCE AND LAURA GRADY 1 0 0
201 E GOLDSBORO ST 1,360 2,326 1,565 1,574 1,934 1,763 1,447 1,552 1,821 1,806 651 1,249 1,203 20,251 51.3 3 17.1 - BUDDY JONES 1 0 0
201 E MAIN ST 20 59 101 245 715 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 524 1,666 4.2 2 2.1 MARK AND CINDY PEELE 0 1 0
201 HINNANT ST I 5,550 5,475 0 3,341 0 0 0 16,523 2,499 1,662 4,359 9,866 7,892 57,167 144.7 2 _.._ 72.4 CHRISTIAN REYES - -_ 0 1 0
201 N DAMS ST 4,160 4,471 6,394 4,985 3,954 3 952 4148 7 462 6 348 8,411 8 062 6,800 11,040 80,187 203.0 3 67.7 WILMA GARRISON 1 0 0
201 N RAILROAD ST2,640 3,982 2,162 1294 1,692 1,412 15503 1 940 1,918-__1,699 1,354 1,373 2,179 25,148 63.7 3 ---�21.2 JESSICA PRICE 1 0 0
201 W FAYE I I EVILLE ST 5,070 6,328 5,996 5,298 6,879 61954 51-442�-6,1396,398_-6,575 6,143 7,044 9,216 83,482 211.3 3 70 4 SUE DOHM 1 - 0 0
201 W MAIN ST 6,460_7,054 5,865 5_110 5,420 5,030 5,502 6,837 7,019 7,475 6,495 6,488 7,394 82,149 208.0 2 104.0 - -_MARIA GUTIERREZ 0 1 0
201 W WILSON ST 2,730 2,937 2,362 1,849 2,209 2,165 2,128 2,550 2,683 2,293 2,000 1,715 2,046 29,667 75.1 2 37.6 CYNTHIA PAUL 0 1 0
202HINNANT ST 1,530 473 861 390 559 544 425 478 458 707 560 640 252 7,877 19.9 3 6.6 BONNIE JONES 1 0 0
202 N RAILROAS ST 3,320 3,940 3,649 2,269 2,868 2,690 2,938 4,671 6,097 4,477 2,859 2,638 3,106 45,522 115.2 2 57.6 JAY WARREN 0 1 0
202 S US HWY 301 2,670 1,478 1,512 1,480 1,917 3,596 2,065 1,297 582 549 776 11,470 689 30,081 76.2 3 25.4 JEFF JACKSON 1 0 0
202 W FAYETTEVILLE ST 4,570 5,311 5,423 5,350 5,522 5,207 4,651 5,537 5,345 5,220 4,275 5,128 7,009 68,548 173.5 3 57.8 JUAN GOMEZ - 1 0 0
202 W MAIN ST 3,040 2,992 4,113 2,996 1,912 1,509 1,517 1,906 1,474 1,869 716 0 0 24,044 60.9 2 30.4 EDNA SANCHEZ 0 1 0
203 W MAIN ST 2,710 2,739 2,668 2,437 3,700 2,580 2,642 2,805 2,241 2,868 9,826 6,767 4,191 48,174 122.0 2 61.0 JASON BANKS 0 1 0
203 E MAIN ST 4,120 5,006 5,861 7,128 28,153 8,174 4,265 51128 4,733 5,442 5,008 4,657 5,613 93,288 236.2 3 78.7 - CARRIE BAKER - 1 0 0
203 EAST GOLDSBORO ST 5,130 7,031 8 625 8,315 7,862 7,081 5,929 _7 2-1_05 5,347 7,324 6,533 5,342 6,145 87,869 222.5 4 55.6 KEVIN MITCHELL 0 0 0
203 N RAILROAD ST 4,910 5,784 5,183 4,392 5,998 4,659 5,004- 5,4175,230 6,036 3,880 2,169 6,100 64262�» 164.0 4 » 41.0 DARREN ELLIOTT 0 0 0
203 US 301 N3,760 4,281 3,962 3,285 3,908 3,455 21_694 3,273 3,0164,237-__3,467 4,04941473 471860--�_-121.22 ___---_-_60_6 -----ANDREW METCALF 0 1 0
203 W FAYETTEVILLE ST 3,880 4,4941356»4,900 4,326 3,680 3 214 _4 13.1_ 731745 3933_ 3,371 5,670_7,897, 56,603 143.3 2 71.6 _--_ CODY FINN -_»_- 0 1 0
�_-- 203 WILSON ST 2,770 3,242 3,298 3,856 3,099 21559 3,517 3,116 3,035 5,641 5,774 1,191 1,917 43,015 108.9 3 36.3 _-_-___ STANLEY STELL 1 0 0
204 E MAIN ST 13,710 16,600 18,891 10,477 10,605 11,191 11,764 15,927 19,599 33,539 24,940 6,427__-6404 200,074 506.5 3 168.8 ----_ ANTHONY BRAILSFORD 1 0 0
204 HINNANT ST 5,640 6,006 6,155 5,250 6,114 4,800 5,289 6,261 61103 6,718 4,343 5,994 7,875 76,548 193.8 3 64.6 HUGO PACHECO 1 0 0
204 N RAILROAD ST 2,270 2,847 2,162 1,627 1,777 1,397 1,399 2,041 2,275 2,930 2,229 2,943 2,853 28,750 72.8 3 24.3 WANDA WARREN 1 0 0
204 S301 HWY 2,620 2,838 4,415 2,596 2,584 3,049 1,883 2,937 2,898 2,735 1,970 2,270 2,491 35,286 89.3 3 29.8 AARON TRIPP 1 0 0
204 W FAYETTEVILLE ST 5,970 6,900 7,048 9,534 4,463 3,390 3,873 3,674 3,390 5,439 3,914 4,160 1,978 63,733 161.3 2 80.7 RODRIGO VAZQUEZ 0 1 0
205 EWING DR 2,540 3,198 2,660 2,082 3,032 3,314 2,360 2,664 1,615 2,306 2,617 3,923 2,896 35,207 89.1 3 29.7 REBECCA BETTERTON 1 0 0
205 W FAYETTEVILLE ST 4,400 4,843 5,485 5,112 3,344 5,393 5,380 5,621 5,697 6,113 3 545 5,012 5,214 65,159 165.0 3 55.0 -- VANESSA VAZQUEZ 1 0 0
---- 206 E MAIN ST 110 73 0 391 175 87 610 1,138 833 1,297 1,204 1,079 1,133 8,130 20.6 3 6.9 EMILINE BURGESS 1 0 0
206 1.JS301S 3,370 3,876 3,304 3,244 3,111 3,027 3,402 4,147 3,082 3,922 3,127 3,063 3,903 44,578 112.9 3 37.6 PHILLIP JONES 1 0 0
206W FAYETEVILLE ST A __21880_ 3 008 3,279 2,824 3,719 2,260 2,083 3,410 2,461 2,451__224416 4,176_-2835 _37802 95.7 4 23.9 ---� ANIEUCA MARTINEZ 0 0 0
206 W FAYETEVILLE ST B 1,770 2,058 2,002 1,632 1,685 1,225 1,759 21272 1,446 1,767 1,284 1,537 1,713_ 23,550 59.6 4 -_-_-14.9 TIARA HORTON 0 0 0
206 W MAIN ST--- - _1 750__--11 779 1,849�1,564^-2,394_.2 285 2,153 21-310_21195 1 807 _11659__-1,773 1,854_ 251372 .._64.2 _2 32.1 �______.___ EDNA RENFROW _�_�_ 0 1 0
_ 207E MAIN ST 2,310 2,412»2_`_2,330 1,746 _1,882 11494 11976 21076 _ 2,047 1,904 _5,786 3,382_W�32,309 81.8 3 27.3 FAYE HAGE 1 0 0 _
207 W FAYETTEVILLE ST _2 610 2,211_ 2,376 2,968 3,661 3,141 21507- 2,425 1,869 21389 1,507 2,587 2,335-32,586 82.5--»_- 2 41.2 MICHAEL PATTERSON 0 1 0

Town of Mlao
Residential
Sanitary Sewer Flows
ADDRESS/DATE Sep-2O Oct-20 Nov-20 Dec-20 Jan-21 Feb-21 Mar-21 Apr-21 May-21 Jun-21 Jul-21 Aug-21 Sep-21 Total AVG GPD BEDS Avg daily flow/bed NAMES 3 beds 2 beds 1 bed
208E MAIN ST 2,270 0 0 101493 6,567 5,731 5y602 5_498 12,513 5_-�629_4,377 4,594 7,243 700 517 178.5 2 89.3 SHIRLEY GUPTON __---_ 0 1 0
208 W FAYETTEVILLE ST A 3,910 5,036 3,199 2,601 3,618 2,542 2,714 ,2.8392,766 2,807 3,491 3,326 4,527 43,376 109.8 4 27.5 VERONICA TAYLOR �.^ 0 0 0 _
208W FAYETTEVILLE STB _21790_.33242 2,807 2,806 3,918 2,906 2,708 _2,927 2,784_ 3,218 2,771 4,992 9,318 47,187 119.5 4 29.9 IESHA SMITH -�-0 0 0
._ 209 W FAYETTEVILLE_ST _9__ 0_0 2,414 2,065 2,074 1,822 1,752 1,675 1,813 1,118 529 0 15,291 38.7 ^2 19.4 LYNNETTE PERKINS 0 1 0 _
��^210 EWING DR „3L010 3,376 3,501 2,859 3,647 3,375 3,182 3,261 2,082 21790 1 132 1,395 1,934 35,544 90.0 3 30.0 CHRISTOPHER CREECH --y-1 0 0
210 W FAYETTEVILLE ST A 3,560 2337 2,038 2,174 2,406 1,520 1,479 1,960 1,3341985_ 1,935 5,599 2234 31,161 78.9 4 19.7 JEFFERY POOLE 0 0 0
210 W FAYEI I tVILLE ST B 1,290 694 17 48 0 0 0 0 0 394 338 266 -464- W 3i511-�- 8.9 4- -- --_-2.2 CALVIN JACKSON 0 0 0
211 S RAILROAD ST._---- 650 424 35-^-0 0 1,806 372 212 303 195 148 5,133 123 9401-�- 23.8 2 11.9 CHARLES DAWES 0 1 0
211 W FAYETTEVILLE ST 2290- 2,322 1,482 1,638 4,205 2,712 2,894 3,467 5,139 3_197 1,802 1,316 2,343 _ 34,807 88.1 2 44.1 JASMINE HUNTER 0 1 0
238 SWING DR 520 2,880 2,583 2,199 3381 308088 2,316 .3286 2827 3,491 3,122 2,792 3,160 38,645 97.8 3 32.6 BRYCE TRUJILLO 1 0 0
301 HINNANT ST 70 208 ` 122 359 332 252 136 123 301 242 323 192 204 2,864 7.3 3 2.4 JERRY C BANTY 1 0 0
__ 301 N US 301 HWY___-_- 51710 6,851_.6,432 4,913_--6,782__6,111 5155, 5398 4,676 5396_4507 5,302 5 394 72,627 183.9 3 61.3 BRITTANIE KYLE ----_-�1_�- 0 0
301 S JS HWY 3 210 4 865 3,578 3 992 4557 41_301. 3,886 4,644 4y349 41148 3,192 3,582 5,621 ---53,925�-- 136 5 3 45.5 RUSSELL CREECH 1�-_ 0 0
. 302 HINNANT ST 0 973 1,649 1,808 1,782--11438 1,229 ,11269 1,385 1,478 1308 1,644 2,240 18203_-� 46.1 3 15.4-_---- --_BRANDON AND HOLLY MATTHEWS 1 0 0
302W MAIN ST 41_630-_-6,563 6,907 5,164 7,30361889 5830 87158y898 7,094 8,200 7,881 10746--�94,800---�- 240.0 2 --_----�1200 STEPHANIE MITCHELL O^-_ 1 0
303 N US HWY 301 --� 920 _ 1 372_1 378 1031 1,357 1,067 1,105 1,1971y023 1218 1,351 1,216 1,147 15,,382 38.99 3 �_-- 13.0--�- -------GLORIA DANIELS 1 0 0
303 US 301S 910;1308 1,022 9413 1047 814--�1,439 926 999 954. 1122 912 11_426 ---13,827---- 35.0-�,- 3 117 JESSIE PITTMAN �,- 1 0 0
303 W MAIN ST --� 800�_-1d79, 824--_-1_131 1y012 861 837 1,210 1214 31704 4,368 3,419 41355 25,,114------63.6 3 21.2 EDDI MCDARIS --_10 0
304 W MAIN ST 5,140 4,362 3,285 3 428 31759 3,085 2,719 3,355 3,116 3724 3,177 3,258 4130 46,538 117.8 2 58.9 ANNA PATE 0 1 0
--- 305 US 301 N_--�_---�3,210 3,110 2,8493_732 21-729 4313 2226 32943,310 3,795_-1,621__-4,200 41711-,---43,100�--_-_124_3 3 -_---411A ----BELISARIO PADILLA 1 0 0
305 W MAIN ST 930 1,716 1,490 1,494 1,300 11-051 11484 1,441 1,339 1,399 1,473 1,929 2,930 19,976-��--50.6-��-�2-�. 25.3 MATTHEW MASSEY-_.-_-_-� 0�-_�-1 0
306SUS301 2 700 2519 2,308 1081 2,458 _21-169 1864�2,5996y001 16,292 2,182 1,7697,370 _ 52,312_____ 132A 4 33.1 --���-��-B.L.WIWAMS 0 0 0
306 W MAIN ST 370 286 398 324 326 299 347 206 277 224 353 249 348 4007 10.1 3 3A HILMONT VILLAGE 1 0 0
306 W MAIN ST APT 6 780 977 1,205 1,1105 992 932 1,044 1,551 1,325 1,828 1,518 1,343 1,653_ 16,253 41.1 1 41.1 SANDRA KAY DIXON ��--� 0 0 1 -_
307 HINNANT ST 2,120_ 1,842_3,341_3,762 3,428 3,003 2,370 2,356 1,777 2,288 1,420 2,138 3,421 33,26684.22 3 28.1 -�--W PAULETTE BRYANT 1 0 0
307 N US 301 HWY 5,980 7,332 8,813 5,983 10,011 8700---12902 7,438 10,524 13,451 5,861 11,316 12,628 120,939 306.2 2 153.1 FAYE LANGSTON TT� 0 1 0
307 W MAIN ST 3,080 3,763 3,317 3,170 3,136 2,398 2,407 _2,718 2y660 3,352__2,469 2,545 3,113 38,128 96.5 _ 2 48.3 _---_ USA SUWVAN ---� 0--� 1 0
309 HINNANT ST 620
591 1,034 744 475 473 1,428 525 413 325 38 526 710 7,902 20.0 3 6.7 PAULETTE BRYANT 1 0 0
309 W MAIN ST , 1,130 1,155 5 135 1 _ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2,426 6.1 2 3.1 _ C S DIXON 0 1 0
311 W MAIN ST 850 1,012 622 775 625 882 1,161 846 6,635 387 319 220 718 15,052 38.1 3 T--- 12.7 ��Y--- ALFRD PRICE 1 0 0
395 HINNANT ST 410 4,695 4,332 4,032 3,973 3,839 4,012 4,387 4,635 5,665 4,940 4,579 5,289 54,788 138.7 3 46.2 STEVEN WHEELER 1 0 0
_-_ 401 N US 301 HWY 11,810 14,265 16,702 14,282 18,484 15,038 12,996 14,123 15,747 15,603 13,808 15,852 21,899 200,609 507.9 2 253.9 DEREK AND BRANDY WALKER 0 1 0
401 W MAIN ST 510 616 1,734 1,467 672 536 536 516 480 538 394 457 651 9,107 23.1 2 11.5 ROBERY WAYNE MARTIN 0 1 0
402 US 301 N 4,080 18,516 4,213 3,224 3,834 3,331 3,353 4,180 4,407 2,868 2,444 4,767 3,991 63,208 160.0 3 53.3 _ AUDRYTHORTON 1 0 0
402 W MAIN ST 3 880 6,894 7,290 7,199 8,565 14,494 6,261 5,205 20 16 4 0 49 59,877 151.6 1 151.6 JUNE NARRON 0 0 1
403 US 301 N 4,270 5,030 5,239 5,008 5,449 6,174 6,235 6,782 8,249 6,744 4,368 4,628 3,944 72,120 182.6 4 45.6 JONATHAN FLEMER 0 0 0
403 W MAIN ST 2,030 2,683 2,440 1,996 2,260 1,723 1,768 2,233 2,619 2,779 1,761 2,678 3,633 30,603 77.5 2 38.7 STEPHEN PATE 0 1 0
404 B W MAIN ST 0 11 8 20 18 7 7 9 4 8 1,514 103 111 1,820 4.6 5 0.9 FRANCES CAMPBELL 0 0 0
404 N US 301 HWY 580 1,026 1,489 853 2,077 1,516 1,633 1,243 1,743 2,024 2,471 2,119 2,816 21,590 54.7 2 27.3 LASASHA MCKOY AND JOSHUA SCOTT 0 1 0
406 N US 301 HWY 7,850 5,820 4,415 3,697 4,403 4,347 4,440 8,616 6,969 5,041 11,359 9,557 14,823 91,337 231.2 4 57.8 NOEL PARKER 0 0 0 -
406 W MAIN ST 1,890 1,967 1,752 1,649 1,820 1,480 1,496 1,891 1,663 1,853 1,571 1,855 2,409 23,296 59.0 2 29.5 LLOYD HOLT 0 1 0
408 W MAIN ST 3,560 4,673 3,937 3,744 3,634 3,172 2,419 5,072 5,689 6,618 3,697 3,694 2,429 52,338 132.5 2 66.3 BARBARA CAISON 0 1 0
409 W MAIN ST 1,340 1,653 1,621 1,667 1,829 1,650 1,643 4,961 20,059 5,025 1,825 2,346 4,320 49,939 126.4 2 63.2 FRANK HOLLAND 0 1 0
410 N HWY 301 2,590 3,799 3,293 2,192 3,495 2,843 2,954 3,035 2,693 5,075 2,479 5,980 16,958 57,386 145.3 3 48.4 JANEY LANE 1 0 0
410 W MAIN ST 2,310 2,512 2,171 2,054 2,916 4,039 6,813 2,502 2,689 2,693 2,122 2,389 3,902 39,112 99.0 2 49.5 BETTY WATSON 0 1 0 _
411 W MAIN 2,080 2,517 2,082 2,278 2,619 2,494 2,197 2,634 2,158 2,575 2,082 2,097 2,790 30,603 77.5 3 25.8 DONALD HOLLAND 1 0 0
412 N US 301 A 12 255 457 501 1,219 1,114 1,122 1,118 923 1,131 1,255 1,629 1,428 12,164 30.8 2 15.4 BRANDON HARPER 0 1 0
412 N US 301 B 4,330 4,662 4,774 3,163 3,028 2,496 2,407 2,302 2,402 14,727 2,956 3,789 5,462 56,498 143.0 2 71.5 - MARINA SOLACHE 0 1 0
412 W MAIN ST 2,100 2,115 1,258 1,860 1,795 1,275 1,256 1,649 2,334 1,875 3,525 1,598 2,402 25,042 63.4 3 21.1 LARRY HOLLAND 1 0 0
413 W MAIN 2,260 1,430 2,193 1,020 2,284 1,661 1,718 1,854 1,690 2,139 1,894 1,806 2,720 24,669 62.5 2 31.2 JUSTIN LEE HOLLAND 0 1 0
414 W MAIN ST 5,570 5,945 7,197 6,277 6,817 6,961 5,440 5,843 4,967 5,803 8,487 6,474 4,011 79,792 202.0 4 50.5 JASON HOLLAND 0 0 0
4660 US 3015 1,830 2,156 2,694 858 2,315 3,078 2,496 2,663 1,414 1,713 1,060 2,728 5,446 30,451 77.1 2 38.5 DONALD AND PATRICE MARTIN 0 1 0
502 W MAIN ST 910 726 472 727 618 403 656 241 383 650 587 193 592 7,158 18.1 3 6.0 PEARL HOLLAND 1 0 0
503 W MAIN ST 2,300 7,861 11,573 4,710 1,117 832 1,187 876 888 1,224 1,296 9,359 55,804 99,027 250.7 2 125.4 NANCY BISCHOFF 0 1 0
504 W MAIN 51 9,150 8,247 7,578 6,280 8,195 7,872 6,561 8,170 8,360 8,225 5,927 5,435 6,329 96,329 243.9 3 81.3 AMANDA HILL _ 1 0 0
505 W MAIN ST 2,190 2,599 2,067 1,998 2,332 1,972 12,316 3,179 1,876 2,276 1,988 1,979 2,599 39,371 99.7 2 49.8 KAREN BOWLEY 0 1 0
506 W MAIN ST 510 688 889 749 1,016 983 663 823 705 866 622 716 744 9,974 25.3 2 12.6 SHEILA JONES 0 1 0
507 W MAIN ST 2,940 3,676 3,497 3,305 3,441 2,705 3,087 3,708 3,756 3,697 3,101 2,658 3,526 43,097 109.1 2 54.6 DEBORA MYERS 0 1 0
508 W MAIN ST 1,090 776 834 657 1,121 1,043 824 954 975 989 952 1,160 1,661 13,036 33.0 3 11.0 ANTHONY E CAPPS 1 0 0
509 W MAIN ST 6,010 7,296 6,267 6,543 6,710 4,930 4,944 6,576 5,121 7,887 7,361 9,622 10,909 90,176 228.3 2 114.1 SUSAN MILLIGAN 0 1 0
510 W MAIN ST 5,130 5,216 4,523 4,101 4,438 3,856 3,489 4,613 6,289 5,727 4,723 5,103 5,774 62,982 159.4 3 _ 53.1 GREGORY COLEY 1 0 0
T 511 W MAIN ST 13,520 20,237 25,869 18,754 15,158 14,831 15,385 5,087 4,698 5,071 4,666 4,492 4,855 152,623 386.4 2 193.2 NARKISE GREEN 0 1 0
515 W MAIN ST 450 803 572 742 726 673 645 795 634 974 479 492 1,103 9,088 23.0 2 11.5 STEPHANIE WEST 0 1 0
517 W MAIN ST 1,250 1,593 1,3348 1,529 1,726 1,614 1,309 1264 1,335 1,523 821_1,032 1,538 18,082 45.8 3 15.3 CHARITY BRYANT 1 0 0
__- 5204 US301N __� 6,160 7,267-�7,2263 6,804 7,632 7,371 7,155 �6,9913 6,613 7,664 6,854 7,275 9,973 95,029 240.6 3 80.2 BRISTOL WHITFIELD JR. 1 0 0

TOWN OF MICRO 1 RESIDENTIAL FLOW REDUCTION STUDY
Appendix E
Non-Residential Flow Data
17 Final:
Municipal Engineering,Inc. (0/

Micro Non-Residential Water Usage
ADDRESS/DATE Sep-20 Oct-20 Nov-20 Dec-20 Jan-21 Feb-21 Mar-21 Apr-21 May-2lJun_21- Jul-21u�2_A1_ Se_p-21 TOTAL AVG flow/DAY NAME
101 E FAYETTEVILLE ST 2,150 1,171 774 4,261 1,080 906 638 746 996 965 925 752 614 15,978 ---------41_____ QUALITY TRUCK SERICE
101 S RAILROAD ST 630 2,960 401 401 355 265 339 482 539 648 693 773 590 9,076 23 MICRO POST OFFICE
101 N US HWY 301 0 108 74 10 0 42 104 633 156 147 677 9 0 1,960 ___ 5 __ __________ FRANKIE HOUSE
6,3 102 E MAIN ST 4,770 6,891 5,497 4,995 5,787 5,153 6,136 5,460 66 5,724 5,130 7,279 0 69,188 _-_176-__ _OLDS TOWNS AKH STEOUSE __
102 S RAILROAD ST 0 17 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17 -_ 0_ BB&T#6070702
102 US 301 SOUTH 4,400 5,198 4,374 4,222 7,947 4,291 4,046 6,323 5,216 6,723 5,099 6,789 9,593 74,221 188 AMIN SALEH
102 W MAIN ST 200 856 764- 715 659 608 809 736 702 899 520 731 896 9,095 23_- -_-_____HINNANT OUTREACH CENTER
103 5 RAILROAD 300 404 795 272 307 324 257 315 305 345 299 303 514 4,740 12 NC PAPER COMPANY
104 B HWY 301 N 1,180- 614 553 568 438 691 411 2,035 1,198 962 914 647 904 _11,115 w_- 28 MFWB CHURCH FAMILY LIFE
104 US 301 N 490 1,101 3,102 1,124 811 613 224 597 846 754 1,030 760 6,477 17,929 46 MICRO FREE WILL BAPTIST
106 E MAIN ST 1,240 370 0 0 0 2,902 2,577 2,696 2,474 2,825 2,307 2,407 2,959 22,757 58 ____ JOHNNY AND KYM DIXON
106 W WILSON ST 840 2,007 558 697 465 648 716 661 581 966 566 808 923 10,436 26 FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH
107 E FAYETTEVILLE ST 300 743 419 411 464 580 3,281 1,288 4,723 2,229 1,296 10,079 4,634 30,447 77 FARO DE ESPERANZA
108 W FAYETTEVILLE 120 167 221 194 335 128 111 125 234 209 156 345 8,036 10,381 26 METHODIST CHURCH
109 W MAIN ST 90 211 149 217 245 175 224 275 240 221 240 313 116 _2,716_ 7 _ CHURCH OF OUR LIVING GOD
111 W MAIN ST 830 5,062 360 1,133 274 620 526 8,006 282 392 241 298 235 18_259 46 CARRIE LINDER WILLIAMS
--------- -- ------
201 N HWY 301 2,160 2,179 1,167 1,232 1,370 1,282 970 1,174 1,328 1,116 971 1,044 1,446 17,439 44 HOE HYBERG
203 S RAILROAD 0 15,328 27,594 14,486 12,264 15,342 15,071 16,812 16,018 20,542 .1-1,2-87 23,538 15,661 ^203,940 518 MICRO SUMIT PROCESSORS
-
301 E MAIN ST 430 786 11,370 17,764 1,303 0 1,269 1,524 2,192 1,503 _14324__ 223 34,778 74,466 _ 189 MICRO ELEMENTARY S-
CHOOL
302 5 US 301 HWY 1,250 1,703 1,301 1,398 862 1,372 1,257 1,355 83,342 1,200 2,233 2,445 3,193 102,911 261 HAIR GALLERY
302 B HIGHWAY 301 S 200 246 474 442 161 102 83 262 5 165 23 176 132 2,471 6-_ RITCHIE CREECH
317 S US 301 6,680 8,061 7,703 4,918 4,888 4,232 0 4,067 5,388 5,433 3,557 4,579 5,250 64,756_ 164 JAKES
319 US 301 S 950 1,020 13,300 7,686 10,722 5,863 1,804 6,408 7,905 2,325 3,526 3,637 1,937 67,083 170 DOLLAR GENERAL tf 135
435 OIL COMPANY RD 12,160 19,893 20,636 18,147 7,373 -24e438- 23,344 22,829 36,783 29,129 16,630 7,417�51,969 290,748 • 738 NORTH JOHNSTON MIDDLE SCHOOL
5226 US 301 N 50 26 4 25 0 0 49 13 86 62 26 99 136 576 1 WHITE ROCK CHURCH
5270 US 301 N 20 43 1,449 1,791 537 23 8 3 2 169 957 1,308 164 6,474 16 WARREN CHAPPEL CHURCH
5915 US 301 N 54,960 54,480 37,184 34,540 35,292 35,961 38,747 45,620 57,671 88,920 21,483 24,334 119,925 649,117 1,648 NORTH JOHNSTON HIGH SCHOOL
MONTHY TOTALS 96,400 131,645 140,223 121,649 93,939 106,561 103,001 130,445 235,578 174,573 82,107 101,093 271,082 1,788,296
Avg.Gallons per Day 4,539 t
J