090034_Routine Inspection_20211117

Type of Visit: , Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: QRoutine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit:
Farm Name:
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Arrival Time:
Departure Time:
/;c'
Owner Email:
Phone:
County:
Region: ie
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
z77.6 /6117hee
Title:
Phone:
Latitude:
Integrator:
Certification Number: 54-17
Certification Number:
Longitude:
Wean to Finish
W an to Feeder
/Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Boars
Othe
Other
Design Current
Capacity P
!HIP 3SaD
Layers
Non -Layers
Pullets
Turkeys
Turkey Poults
Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
of the State other than from a discharge?
0 Yes dNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑No ❑NA ❑NE
ErNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
�No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 1 of 3
2/4/2015 Continued

Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate'? ❑ Yes ,®1 o ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
Identifier: !
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
❑ Yes
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the peiniit?
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
ErNo ❑NA El NE
io El NA NE
s ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑-1Qo ❑ NA ❑ NE
[Yes
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes n No ❑ NA ❑ NE
n Yes /21 o ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window
12. Crop Type(s):
13. Soil Type(s):
/
❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
l)
4 1 -7x,e9dos
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes [E No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes la< ❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes Er o ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? n Yes 10 ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑ WUP n Checklists ri Design n Maps n Lease Agreements ❑ Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. n Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ri 120 Minute Inspections ri Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections ❑ Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
Page 2 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued
❑ Yes 2‹) ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes Q ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes I"No D NA ❑ NE

Facility Number: - y
Date of Inspection: /7//7/?/
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes IFKo ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification?
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
❑ Yes ErKo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes I.10 ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes h10 ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ErNo ❑ NA El NE
❑ Yes 131\l0 ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes Ko ❑ NA ❑ NE
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑Yes []No ❑NA ❑NE
❑ Yes I2Ko ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes I310 ❑NA ❑NE
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other Qom
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations (use additional pages as necessary),
6(/ t» B-�-L�j�,r�s ��'s� ✓� �'-�i�S 2 "7;je-.
/I-Y-1/747J 0/.5 /27 A/r/C?- pi7-c 41/104-,-- r "04.0.7
°AID g"r �� r�
ry � a�Y'' � � �
111
14al 7411-71-;,5
4.--.74/-z_ 7
4.1-10X Know 74) is x•eal.
tte,./Zee_ele:6 ///12-2 hi g
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Page 3 of 3
1/2/sekd 3rekt-c thty
Phone: i,)
Date: /' /i 7/2/
2/4/2015

FACILITY #: 7 -, FARM NAME: 1
FREEBOARD ACTUAL LAGOON LE EL
PERMIT (#19)
- DUE EVERY 5 YEARS
EXPERIATION DATE 1(
- OIC CARD YES OR NO
,r,A
4/60
NUMBER OF ANIMALS
WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN (WUP) (#20)
SOIL TYPES n
CROP TYPES t NEGATIVE NUMBER
THE UTLIZATION PLAN SHOULOHAVE A (-) N
ODOR CONTROL CHECK LIS YES° OR NO
Irrigation Plan Maps
WASTE REPORT (#21)
-GOOD FOR 60 DAYS BEFORE OR AFTER
DATE -' NITROGEN LEVEL
�--
• / 3) ',1
SOIL REPORT (#21)
EVERY 3 YEARS:
SATE 1 //4-//,;a
P-I (NO MORE THEN 400) PH (Note if 4 or Tess)
CuIZN (NO MORE THEN r 0 ) CU ZN
(IF PEANUTS NO MORE THEN 300)
MENTAL CHECK OF CROP AND FIELD NUMBERS
IRR2 (#21)
ZONE ACRES PAN CROP TYPE
FLOW RATES NITROGEN (N)
120 Min inspection initialed Weather Codes
Commercial Fertilizer
Chicken Litter

CALBRIATION (#24)
- EACH REEL SHOULD BE CALIBRATED
- DATE DUE EVERY TWO YEARS / / /,
- FLOW RATES / 7 0
RAIN FALL (#21)
-INITIAL AFTER 1" RAIN EVENT e•
-LOOK FOR ANY LEVEL THAT IS LESS THEN THE DESIGNED FREEBORED
-LOOK FOR BIG NUMBER DIFFERENCES SEE THAT THEY MATCH THE IRR2
FORM
SLUDGE (#21 & 25)
-DUE EVERY YEAR: DATE 5 0I.,1
0: 3P: 3. y % RATIO OF SLUDGE Y /
OTHER FORMS (#22 AND #21)
RAIN BREAKER FORM � CROP YEILDS ,� '` MORTALITY _--'
VISUAL CHECK
FOUNDATION OR PIT LEAKS PIPE LEAKS LAGOON
SEEPAGE LAGOON BARE AREAS TREES OR GRASS NEED TO
BE REMOVED EROSION DITCHES
WINTER CROP(OVERSEEDED) ALIVE CROP HARVESTED
FIELDS GOOD HEALTHY CORPS . CORRECT
CROPS NO PONDING REELS FEED
BINS LAGOON GARBAGE