20131218 Ver 1_401 Application_20131113

20131218
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
8412 Falls of Neuse Road, Suite 104, Raleigh, NC 27615 - Phone: [phone] - Fax: [phone]
sandec.com
PA IT
November 21, 2013
S&EC Project # 10525.W17
To: US Army Corps of Eng' N.C. Div�ion of Water Resources
Raleigh Regulatory Field ice ... SurfaeeWater Protection Section (SWPS)
Attn: James Lastinger Attn: Karen Higgins
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105 Archdale Building —12'h Floor rNOV 0�� Wa ke Forest, NC 27587 512 North Salisbury Street,
Raleigh, NC 27604 From: Bob Zarzecki 2 2'
013
Soil & Environmental Consultants, P.A.
Re: CITY OF RALEIGH — SANFORD CREEK SEWER PUMP STATION REMOVAL. '� 'A
GRAVITY SEWER PROJECT '�•�!
Rolesville, Wake County, NC
On behalf of the applicant, City of Raleigh (COR), please find attached a complete application and supplemental
information requesting written concurrence from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineer, (USACE) and the N.C. Division of
Water Resources (DWR) that the activities proposed below may proceed under Nationwide Permit 12 and General
Water Quality Certification 3884. Please contact me at (919) 846 -5900 if you have any questions or require additional
information.
PRO7F.1^.T S1 1MMARV
Project Name
COR Sanford Creek Sewer Pump Station Removal &
Gravity Sewer Project
Project Type
Sanitary Sewer
Owner / Applicant
City of Raleigh, NC
County
Wake
Nearest Town
Rolesville
Waterbody Name
Sanford Creek
River Basin
Neuse River Basin
Index Number
27 -33 -5
Class
C; NSW
USGS Cataloging Unit
03020201
1MPArT C1IMMARV
Stream Impact (acres):
0.005
Wetland Impact (acres):
0
Open Water Impact (acres):
0
Total Impact to Waters of the U.S. (acres)
0.005
Total Stream Impact (linear feet):
40
Neuse River Buffer — Zone 1 Impacts
2,424
Neuse River Buffer — Zone 2 Impacts
1,617
Attachments: PCN Application / Agent Authorization Forms (City & property owner)
USGS, Soil Survey, SHPO- HPOWEB, & Vicinity- Overall Map (Wake GIS) maps
Site Photos
Impact Exhibits
DWR Application Fee $240.00

`��F WATF,9 G
O
o <
Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.4 January 2009
Pre - Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A. Applicant Information
1. Processing
1 a. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps:
® Section 404 Permit ❑ Section 10 Permit
1 b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number. or General Permit (GP) number.
1c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
® Yes ❑ No
1 d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
® 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non -404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ® Riparian Buffer Authorization
1e. Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWQ
401 Certification:
❑ Yes ® No
For the record only for Corps Permit:
❑ Yes © No
1f. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for
mitigation of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank
or in -lieu fee program.
❑ Yes ® No
1g. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h
below.
❑ Yes ® No
1h. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
❑ Yes ® No
2. Project Information
2a. Name of project:
City of Raleigh Sanford Creek Sewer Pump Station Removal & Gravity Sewer Project
2b. County:
Wake
2c. Nearest municipality / town:
Rolesville
2d. Subdivision name:
n/a
2e. NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state project no:
n/a
3. Owner Information
3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed:
Heritage East Developers, Inc. (location of sewer crossing) - City of Raleigh Project
3b. Deed Book and Page No.
BI 3113/P2184
3c. Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable):
Andy Ammons
3d. Street address:
10405 Ligon Mill Road, Suite G
3e. City, state, zip:
Wake Forest, NC 27587
3f. Telephone no.:
* call Agent
3g. Fax no.:
* fax Agent
3h. Email address:
* email Agent
Page 1 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

4. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a. Applicant is:
❑ Agent ® Other, specify: City of Raleigh - Owner of Sewer System
4b. Name:
City of Raleigh - Robert L. Massengill, PE (Assistant Public Works Director)
4c. Business name
(if applicable):
n/a
4d. Street address:
PO Box 590
4e. City, state, zip:
Raleigh, NC 27602
4f. Telephone no.:
919- 996 -3479
4g. Fax no.:
' fax Agent
4h. Email address:
" email Agent
5. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a. Name:
Bob Zarzecki
5b. Business name
(if applicable):
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
5c. Street address:
8412 Falls of Neuse Road, Suite 104
5d. City, state, zip:
Raleigh, NC 27614
5e. Telephone no.:
919 -846 -5900
5f. Fax no.:
919 -846 -9467
5g. Email address:
bzarzecki @sandec.com
Page 2 of 10

B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID): 11759666069
1b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees): 1
Latitude: 35.9343 Longitude: -78.4714
1c. Property size:
28.2 acres
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water to proposed project:
Sanford Creek (Stream Index No. 27 -33 -5)
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water:
C; NSW
2c. River basin:
Neuse River - 03020201
3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
The site is currently an undisturbed perennial stream with a wooded riparian buffer. The general land use in the vicinity is vacant land and single
family residential subdivisions.
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property: 0.21
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property: 1,389
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
To connect two existing, gravity sewer lines to allow for the removal of an existing, City of Raleigh sewer pump station.
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
Open excavation & re- establishment of pre - existing grades to install a new gravity sewer line. Heavy earth moving equipment/excavators to be used.
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
project (including all prior phases) in the past?
® Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
Comments:
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
of determination was made?
❑ Preliminary © Final
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known): Bob Zarzecki
Agency /Consultant Company:
Other. S &EC, PA
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
Performed as part of the SAW - 2008 -00746 verification and jurisdictional determination for the Stone property development. Note this impact is solely
intended to allow for the removal of an existing pump station, and was not required to develop the Stone property or adjacent developments.
5. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
❑Yes J@ No Unknown
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project?
❑ Yes ® No
6b. If yes, explain.
Page 3 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1 a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
❑ Wetlands ® Streams — tributaries ® Buffers ❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a.
Wetland impact
number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
2b.
Type of impact
2c.
Type of wetland
2d.
Forested
2e.
Type of jurisdiction
Corps (404,10) or
DWQ (401, other)
2f.
Area of
impact
(acres)
W1 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
-
W2 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
-
W3 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
-
W4 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
-
W5 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
-
W6 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
-
2g. Total Wetland Impacts:
0
2h. Comments:
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a.
Stream impact
number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary (T)
3b.
Type of impact
3c.
Stream name
3d.
Perennial (PER) or
intermittent (INT)?
3e.
Type of
jurisdiction
3f.
Average
stream
width
(feet)
3g.
Impact
length
(linear
feet)
S1 T
Excavation
Sanford Creek
PER
Corps
5
40
S2 -
Choose one
-
-
S3 -
Choose one
S4 -
Choose one
-
-
S5 -
Choose one
_
S6 -
Choose one
3h. Total stream and tributary Impacts
40
3i. Comments:
Page 4 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then indiv, ually list all open water impacts below.
4a.
Open water
impact number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
4b.
Name of waterbody
(if applicable)
4c.
Type of impact
4d.
Waterbody
type
4e.
Area of impact (acres)
01 -
Choose one
Choose
02 -
Choose one
Choose
03 -
Choose one
Choose
04 -
Choose one
Choose
4f. Total open water Impacts
0
4g. Comments:
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, the complete the chart below.
5a.
Pond ID number
5b.
Proposed use or
purpose of pond
5c.
Wetland Impacts (acres)
5d.
Stream Impacts (feet)
5e.
Upland
(acres)
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
P1
Choose one
P2
Choose one
5f. Total:
5g. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a. Project is in which protected basin?
® Neuse ❑ Tar - Pamlico ❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman ❑ Other.
6b.
Buffer Impact
number—
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
6c.
Reason for impact
6d.
Stream name
6e.
Buffer
mitigation
required?
6f.
Zone 1
impact
(square
feet )
6g.
Zone 2
impact
(square
feet
B1 T
Sewer - Construction
Sanford Creek
No
600
400
B2 P
Sewer - Maintenance
Sanford Creek
No
1,824
1,217
B3 -
Yes/No
B4 -
Yes/No
B5 -
Yes(No
B6 -
Yes/No
6h. Total Buffer Impacts:
2,424
1,617
61. Comments: impacts 131 & 62 are at the same crossing. B1 impacts are the temporary impacts needed r constru on, while the 82 impacts are
what will be maintained and therefore considered permanent.
Page 5 of 10

D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
The property owner worked with S &EC to delineate all regulated streams, wetlands and buffers on the property at the time the Stone property
subdivision was developed. The City (applicant) worked with the owner and S &EC to identify the best crossing location that would still allow for the
connection of the two existing gravity sewer lines and thereby removal of the pump station. The proposed crossing is located in an area with no
wetlands, within a straight section of stream, and abovelavoiding a 10+ foot high cascading waterfall.
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
Tree protection / silt fencing will be located around the construction corridor prior to installation of the sewer line to avoid non - permitted impacts to the
stream and buffer. The contract will review weather forecast and stream conditions to avoid construction during potentially high flow periods.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
❑ Yes ® No
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
❑ DWQ ❑ Corps
2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
project?
❑ Mitigation bank
❑ Payment to in -lieu fee program
❑ Perrnittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank:
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
Type: Choose one
Type: Choose one
Type: Choose one
Quantity:
Quantity:
Quantity:
3c. Comments:
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached.
❑ Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested:
linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature:
Choose one
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only):
square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4f. Non - riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4h. Comments:
5. Complete if Using a Permittes Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
Page 6 of 10
PION Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
buffer mitigation?
Yes ® No
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
Zone
6c.
Reason for impact
6d.
Total impact
(square feet)
Multiplier
6e.
Required mitigation
(square feet)
Zone 1
3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2
1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
0
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund).
6h. Comments: proposed impacts are classified as "allowable" uses within the Neuse River Buffer rules.
Page 7 of 10

E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified
0 Yes ❑ No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
The project does not involve development or installation of new impervious surfaces or new stormwater
Yes No
conveyances. Proposed impacts are solely for the installation of a new sewer line and disturbed areas
❑ 0
will be returned to pre - existing grades, re- vegetated and diffuse flow maintained.
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project?
0
2b. Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan?
❑ Yes 0 No
2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why:
The project does not involve development or installation of new impervious surfaces or new stormwater conveyances. Proposed impacts are solely
for the installation of a new sewer line and disturbed areas will be returned to pre - existing grades, re- vegetated and diffuse flow maintained.
2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a. In which local government's jurisdiction is this project?
❑ Phase II
❑ NSW
3b. Which of the following locally - implemented stormwater management programs
❑ USMP
apply (check all that apply):
[] Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other.
3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
[]Yes ❑ No
attached?
4. DWQ Stormwater Program Review
❑Coastal counties
❑HQW
4a. Which of the following state - implemented stormwater management programs apply
ORW
(check all that apply):
HSession Law 2006 -246
❑Other.
4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ❑ No
attached?
5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
❑ Yes ❑ No
5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
❑ Yes ❑ No
Page 8 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

F. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federallstate/local) funds or the
® Yes ❑ No
use of public (federal/state) land?
1b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State
❑ Yes ©No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (if so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
❑ Yes ©No
letter.)
Comments: Project to be constructed on private land with private funds, but transferred to City.
2. Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards,
❑Yes ® No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b. Is this an after - the -fact permit application?
❑Yes ® No
2c. If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
❑Yes ® No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b. If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
The project does not involve new development. The project is solely intended to remove an existing City of Raleigh pump station to avoid future
maintenance and energy costs.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non - discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
N/A - No new wastewater will be added associated with this project. The project does involve the City of Raleigh sewer system upgrades to remove
an existing pump station. The City will work with DENR to ensure adequate capacity.
Page 9 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
❑ Yes ® No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
Oyes ❑ No
impacts?
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
-
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
NHP and previously evaluated for SAW - 2008 -00746 verification and Jurisdictional determination for the Stone property development.
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat?
❑ Yes ® No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
NOAA ESH Website
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
❑ Yes ® No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA- designated 100 -year floodplain?
❑ Yes ® No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?
NC Flood Map 8 Wake GIS - The FEMA floodplain does not start on Sanford Creek until below the existing Heritage Gates Drive crossing about 1/2
mile down stream.
Digitally signed by Bob Zarzecid
Bob DN: cn=Bob Zarcecid, o=SBEC, PA,
ou= Wetlands Depaftent,
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
email= [e-mail],
Zarzecki C=ue:
Bob Zarecki
20,3.,,.2 „ -0 4:o2:4a 0
November 21, 2013
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name
Applicant/Agent's Signature
Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization
letter from the applicant is provided.)
Page 10 of 10

Environmental Consultants,
AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM
All Blanks To Be Filled In By The Municipal Official
Name: QX of Raleigh
Address: PO Box 590
Ralei NC 27602
Phone: 919 - 9963479
Name/
Date: September 2013
The Department of the Army
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District
P.O. Box 1890
Wilmington, NC 28402
Attn: James Lastinger
Field Office: Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
Re: Wetlands Related Consulting and Permitting
To Whom It May Concern:
I, the current municipal official hereby designate and authorize Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
to act in my behalf as my agent in the processing of permit applications, to furnish upon request
supplemental information in support of applications, etc. from this day forward. The 150t day of
October, 2013.
This notification supersedes any previous correspondence concerning the agent for this project.
NOTICE- This authorization, for liability and professional courtesy reasons, is valid only for
government officials (with the exception oCfiy ofRaletgh stafll to enter the property when
accompanied by S&EC staff. You should call S&EC to arrange a site meeting prior �o visiting the site.
Robert L. Massengill. PE, Assistant PU Diector
Print Municipal Official's Name unicipal Official's gnature
cc: Ms. Karen Higgins, NCDENR - DWR/ WQP
512 North Salisbury Street
Raleigh, NC 27604
cc: Mr. Bob Zarzecki
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA

Environmental Consultants, PA
Road • Raleigh, North (dolma 27614 • Ffioae: [phone] • Fax: [phone]
www SandBr -con
AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM
All Blanks To Be Filled In By The Current Landowner
Name: Heritage East Developers, Inc. - Attn: Andy L. Ammons
Address: 10405 Ligon Mill Road, Suite G
Wake Forest, NC 27587
Phone: [phone]
Project Name /Description: Stone Property /Heritage Enclave S&EC Project # 10525.W16
Date: May 16, 2012
The Department of the Army
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District
P.O. Box 1890
Wilmington, NC 28402
Attn: James Lastinger
Field Office: Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
Re: Wetlands Related Consulting and Permitting
To Whom It May Concern:
I, the current proper owner, hereby designate and authorize Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA to
act in my behalf as my agent in the processing of permit applications, to furnish upon request
supplemental information in support of applications, etc. from this day forward. The 16 day of May,
2011
This notification supersedes any previous correspondence concerning the agent for this project
NOTICE: This authorization, for liability and professional courtesy reasons, is valid only for
government officials to enter the property when accompanied l S${EC staff. Yo should call S &EC
to arrange a site meeting prior to visiting the site. / / I
Heritage East Developers. Inc. - Andrew L Ammons
Print Property Owner's Name
cc: Ms. Karen Higgins, NCDENR - DWQ
512 North Salisbury Street
Raleigh, NC 27604
k . kes
Owner's Signature
cc: Mr. Bob Zarzecki
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA

City of Raleigh — Sanford Creek Sewer Pump Station Removal & Gravity Sewer Project
November 2013
Rolesville, NC, 2013, USGS 1:24 000 Topographic Map
C57 Can
Proposed Stream Crossing i` f
WATKIMS FARM, R©
G. WM4.OW
Lk
�`✓� E3 J . �o
N_
Sewer Pump Station '° �'�' c`ED W�
to be removed _ �`•- -1,� ,T fps �� '
� rev
o n 8 rRnlesville p
,k.
Cncad ---�

City of Raleigh — Sanford Creek Sewer Pump Station Removal & Gravity Sewer Project
November 2013
Wake County Soil Survey — Sheets 15 & 22

COR Sewer Connection - Pump Station Removal Project
IWW
1' `mil r �,�I �� \..• r '
Proposed • •
0�111 '721 WAM LM
Jr
Existing Pump Station
• be • -•
ME R lh!ii-..fA W4 %'�w�
Zo
o
November 21, 2013
• NR Individual Listing
• NR Listing, Gone
* NRHD Center Point
1:24,466
0 0.2 0.4 0.8 mi
0 0.325 0.65 1.3 km
Copyricjtt©2013 National Geographic Society, i -cubed
S&EC

City of Raleigh — Sanford Creek Sewer Pump Station Removal & Gravity Sewer Project
November 2013
Photo 1 - Location of Proposed Crossing & Exisitng MH
Photo 3 — Cascading Waterfall downstream to be AVOIDED
Photo 2 — View of stream at Proposed Crossing Location
Photo 4 — Existing Pump Station to be Removed

w
0
0
280
N
N 0
to
O N
�o
ti
Terrell House-Dr
ti
'L
0
N
St
Mill
Bridge
Nature
Park
260
Y
a
d
z
Z
O
M
Winslet Dr
�o
ti
�o
ti
p0
Existing
Gravity
Sewer
City of Raleigh - Pump Station Removal Project
ti
77c;
340
.r
�Qo .
i
31 80
Lawson Walk Way J
E.M.-v
.r"rn
Existing
Pump
Station
Existing
Forcemain
j \ .Sewer
i
F 390
�m
m
,3c�0
3180 3y � ROBe�
`po
370
I 00
Existing
Gravity w
Sewer ° ��� Proposed
Connection
Existing
Waterfall Gravity
Sewer
o
rn M
M
a
0
0
�o
0
c
380
I
O C10
n �:
n 1 fP
AOO eP�Oi,
NDisclaimer
0 205 410 820 Feet Maps makes every effort to produce and publish
the most current and accurate information possible.
r r r I r r r I However, the maps are produced for information purposes,
and are NOT surveys. No warranties, expressed or implied,
1 inch = 400 feet are provided for the data therein, its use,or its interpretation.

N/F
EDUCATIONAL INFORMATION
CORPORATION
D.B. 3331 PG. 16
0
N/F
HERITAGE EAST DEVELOPERS
D.B. 12551 PG. 2516
PERENNIAL
STREAM EX. SANITARY
OUTFALL
N/F
CHALKS PROPERTIES LL
D.B. 12362 PG. 755
w
0
JUN 1 P—lUV11 1 1r.IN 1
STREAM
M
\ PERENNIAL
STREAM
N/F
HERITAGE EAST DEVELOPERS
D.B. 12551 PG. 2516
G�.
�s
O�
N/F
CHALKS PROPERTIES LLC
D.B. 12362 PG. 755
WETLAND
(TYPICAL)
RALEIGH
ARY SEWER —
2005 PG. 385
ri
N/F
HERITAGE EAST DEVELOPERS
D.B. 13113 PG. 2184
PERENNIAL
STREAM
PROPOSED IMPACT
SEE SHEET B -200
SANITARY OUTALL
TO PUMP STATION
EXISTING PL
STATION
N/F
LOUISE M ROGERS
TRUSTEE ETAL'
D.B. 11209 PG. 445
N/F
REDUS RALEIGH HOUSING LLC
D.B. 14855 PG. 2303
\yF0
N/F
JAMES M WILLIAMSON
& MARY E HERBERT
D.B. 8958 PG. 1946
N/F
SIMMENTAL VENTURES
D.B. 14365 PG. 322
p
4 _
N/F
SIMMENTAL VENTURES
D.B. 14365 PG. 322
BIG WILLOW WAY
� z
F
z
F
J
° a a
n
92
� aNmz
J�
p N Pa�
Z alla__
° mWO�T
z �(�
W LIM
E�
�zw
whC
�v
w�
w�
MAY 28TH 2013
DRAWING NO.
B -100

�O
F
Z
WF
J
F
Z <tl
U � 4V
JNNW!
n }
A N •P P}
j
W 0
Z xinm F
p OrPP3
Z 13 J<
W dC --
x
�
V
�
O
OHO
V
�
�V
W�
w�
MAY 28TH 2013
DRAWING NO.
B -200

PHASE IV B SEWER EXTENSION PROPOSED GRADE
I � PROPOSED GRADE
EXISTING GROUND /
372
/ MH"30
3 619 / STA: 14 +51.13
OUT =360.00
/ PROPOSED GRADE
3 64 PULTON PLACE
\ DOGHOUSE
MH"25
\ STA: 10 +02.72 STA: 12 +06.83
TOP= 359.77 TOP= 363.76
IN (EX)=47.87 360 \ OUT (NEW) 345.87 / 11N (30)=341.00
/ iN (24)= 341.00
/ OUT= 338.50
EXISTING GROUND /
/ w
z
Cl
P
3,51
340
336
10 +00
11+00
12 +00
13 +00
14 +00
15 +00
�a
h
Z
J
m
v r 4m
� nnmZ
r
m n ua�
Z x=omi
p OYPP
W Lmmc%�:
�zw
N
who
UPLO
� V�
�V
W�
w�w�
as
MAY 28TH 2013
DRAWING N0.
B -300