SW4210901_Wetland Determination/Report_20211117

P I 11WLJ
P I L O T E N V I R 0 N M E N T A L. I N C
January 22, 2020
Mr. Kevin Sasser
Gerringer Mill Road, LLC
P.O. Box 10
Whitsett, North Carolina 27214
Reference: Wetland Delineation
Kernodle Landing
Approximate 224-Acre Tract
Gerringer Mill Road
Burlington, Alamance County, North Carolina
Pilot Project 3166.1
Dear Mr. Sasser:
Pilot Environmental, Inc. (Pilot) is pleased to submit this report of the wetland delineation for the
approximate 224-acre tract located north and south of Gerringer Mill Road in Burlington,
Alamance County, North Carolina.
Background
Wetlands are defined by the United States Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) and the United
States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) as "those areas that are inundated or saturated
by surface or groundwater at a frequency and duration sufficient to support, and under normal
circumstances, do support a prevalence of vegetation typically adapted for life in saturated soil
conditions." In order for an area to be classified as wetland, hydrophytic vegetation, hydric soils,
and wetland hydrology indicators must be present.
Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (CWA) regulates the discharge of dredge and fill materials
into waters of the United States (lakes, rivers, ponds, streams, etc.), including wetlands. Waters
of the United States include the territorial seas, navigable coastal and inland lakes, rivers and
streams, intermittent streams, and wetlands. The EPA and the USACE jointly administer the
Section 404 program. Section 401 of the Clean Water Act grants each state the authority to
approve, condition, or deny any Federal permits that could result in a discharge to State waters.
Jurisdictional features include wetlands, open waters, ponds, lakes, and perennial/intermittent
streams. Jurisdictional features are regulated by the USACE and North Carolina Department of
Environmental Quality -Division of Water Resources (NCDEQ-DWR). Permits are required priorto
impacting any jurisdictional feature. The type of permit required is specific to the type, location,
and amount of impacts. Stormwater management plans and/or mitigation for proposed impacts
could be a requirement of the permit approval process.
PO Box 128, Kernersville, NC 27285
www.pilotenviro.com

Wetland Delineation
Pilot Project 3166.1
January 22, 2020
The findings and conclusions in this report are our opinions based on field conditions
encountered at the time of the site visit. Changes including, but not limited to, regulations,
weather, timber/vegetation removal, and usage/development of the site or nearby properties
can alter the findings and opinions presented in this report. We recommend that this report only
be used for preliminary planning purposes. Agency verifications, followed by a survey of
jurisdictional features, are required to determine the exact extent and locations of jurisdictional
features and are valid for a period of up to five years following issuance of a USACE Jurisdictional
Determination (JD) and/or NCDEQ-DWR Site Determination Letter.
Scope of Services
Pilot was contracted to perform a wetland delineation for the approximate 224-acre tract located
along Gerringer Mill Road in Burlington, Alamance County, North Carolina. The site includes the
parcels identified by the Alamance County Geographical Information System (GIS) as Parcel
Identification Numbers (PINS) 8857858413, 8857734670, 8857836360, 8857734670,
8857530103, 8857427886, and 8857426595. The scope of services included a delineation of
jurisdictional features (streams, wetlands, and other surface waters) on the site.
Literature Review
We reviewed the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) Topographic Map, the U.S. Department of
Agriculture (USDA) Soil Survey of Alamance County, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS)
National Wetland Inventory (NWI) Map, and the Federal Emergency Management Agency
(FEMA) Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM).
• The USGS Topographic Map (Drawing 1) depicts unnamed tributaries to the Haw River on the
northern, eastern, and southern portions of the site. A pond is depicted on the eastern portion
of the site. The Haw River is depicted along the western site boundary. Additional drainage
swales that could contain surface waters or wetlands are located on the site.
• The USDA Web Soil Survey of Alamance County (Drawing 2) identifies the following mapping
units on the site: Chewacla loam (ChA), Cullen clay loam (CnB2, CnC2, and CnD2), Enon sandy
loam (EnB, EnC, and EnD), Enon clay loam (EoB2), Helena sandy loam (HeB and HeQ Riverview
loam (RvA), and Water (W). The Chewacla series consists of somewhat poorly drained,
moderately permeable soils that occur on floodplains. The Cullen series consists of well drained,
moderately permeable soils that occur on upland ridgetops and side slopes. The Enon series
consists of well drained, slowly permeable soils that occur on ridgetops and side slopes. The
Helena series consists of moderately well drained, slowly permeable soils that occur on ridges
and hill slopes. The Riverview series consists of well drained, moderately permeable soils that
occur on floodplains. The Chewacla loam (ChA) soil mapping unit is identified on the Alamance
County Hydric Soils List. The remaining soil mapping units are not identified on the list.
iA

Wetland Delineation
Pilot Project 3166.1
January 22, 2020
Pilot also reviewed the last published USDA Soil Survey of Alamance County (Drawing 2A). The
published soil survey depicts unnamed tributaries to the Haw River generally consistent with
those depicted on the USGS topographic map, and additional unnamed tributaries within
drainage swales on the southern and eastern portions of the site.
• The USFWS NWI Map (Drawing 3) depicts a freshwater pond and riverine features generally
consistent with the those depicted on the USGS Topographic Map.
• The FEMA FIRM (Drawing 4) identifies the western portion of the site along the Haw River within
a regulatory floodway and the 100-year and 500-year floodplains. The remainder of the site is
located in Zone X, an area of minimal flood hazard.
Field Delineation
Pilot conducted the field delineations on November 15-16, 2017 and January 20, 2020. Several
dilapidated structures are located on the northern portion of the site. The remainder of the site
contains fields and wooded land. The northeastern portion of the site south of Gerringer Mill
Road is currently under construction with a residential development.
A pond is located on the eastern portion of the site. The pond is hydrologically connected to up
and downgradient streams and wetlands. Based on our observations, the pond is jurisdictional
and regulated by the USACE. The ordinary high water mark of the pond was marked in the field
with blue and white striped surveyor flagging and geolocated with a handheld Trimble GPS Unit.
Several streams are located on the site. The streams have well-defined channels and evidence of
ordinary high water marks. Streams ISB and SG exhibited weaker stream characteristics and
contained pools of stagnant water and areas with dry stream beds. Based on our observations,
these streams are intermittent. The remainder of the streams have sinuosity, substrate sorting,
riffle -pool complexes, evidence of aquatic fauna, and contained flowing water during our site
visits. Based on our observations, these streams are perennial. The centerlines of the majority of
the streams were marked in the field with blue and white striped surveyor flagging. The
remaining streams (Haw River, SD, and MSA) have clearly defined limits and were flagged at their
origins and approximate intersections with site boundaries. The streams were geolocated with a
handheld Trimble GPS Unit.
Wetlands are located adjacent to and upgradient of the pond and streams and within drainage
swales on the site. The wetlands are separated from surrounding uplands by distinct breaks in
topography, vegetation, hydrology, and/or soils. USACE Wetland Determination Data Forms,
supporting our opinions, are included as attachments. The wetland boundaries were marked in
the field with red and white striped surveyor flagging and geolocated with a handheld Trimble
GPS Unit.
3

Wetland Delineation
Pilot Project 3166.1
January 22, 2020
Drawing 5 shows the approximate locations of the pond, streams, wetlands, and data points, as
well as our flag numbers. Drawing 5 is subject to change during agency verifications of the
delineation.
Watershed Classification
According to the NCDEQ-DWR, the site is located in the Cape Fear River Basin. Several unnamed
tributaries to the Haw River are located on the site. The Haw River is located along the western site
boundary. The NCDEQ-DWR has classified the Haw River, the receiving waters, as Water Supply V
(WS-V); nutrient sensitive waters (NSW).
Additionally, the site is located in the Jordan Lake Watershed. State Regulated Riparian Buffers are
required adjacent to the pond and streams on the site as depicted on the most recent versions of
the USGS Topographic Map (Drawing 1) and the Published USDA Soil Survey (Drawing 2A). There are
discrepancies between several of the features identified on the maps and those delineated in the
field. We recommend consultation with NCDEQ-DWR, Alamance County, and/or the local zoning
authority to determine local buffer/stormwater setback requirements.
Agency Verification
The site has not been verified by the USACE or the NCDEQ-DWR. We understand that our flags
will be surveyed to determine the exact extent and locations of jurisdictional features and
applicable surface water buffers. The delineation, including locations and designations of
features, is subject to change during agency verifications.
Closing
We appreciate the opportunity to provide our services to you. Please contact us at (336) 310-
4527 if you have questions or require additional information.
Sincerely,
Seren M. Homer
Project Manager
ILL'.1 7 4w.-
Michael T. Brame, PWS
Principal
Attachments: Drawing 1— USGS Topographic Map
Drawing 2 — Web Soil Map
Drawing 2A — Published Soil Map
Drawing 3 — NWI Map
Drawing 4 — FEMA FIRM
Drawings 5, 5.1, and 5.2 — Wetland Map
USACE Wetland Determination Data Forms
lH

1 r
Pv
ODA
Is
RIC CA
co
s _{ L.5 iJI
Q, } {r s LEGEND . n
,+ - Site Boundary
Drawing 1 USGS Topographic Map
r f.
' "' Kernodle Landing
USGS Topographic Map �;p,r:�-�;.;.; i �:.,.,-�;-:.,;::';a;,<;:. g
Ossipee and Lake Burlington, =a :' Approximate 224-Acre Tract
NC Quadrangles PIL01. A% Burlington, Alamance County, NC
Scale: 1"=2,000' PLOT 6HVIRONMINTAL,I14i Pilot Project3166.1

C�
dim i
CCU
ROW
A
y 1
JAI Jt2l
4 _
Y
J _ i
R� R
e
�a LEGEND
Site Boundary
Drawing 2 Web Soil Map
USDA Web Soil Survey f,.
Kernodle Landing
of Alamance County, NC - =�NP
Approximate 224-Acre Tract
Scale: 1" - 800''La'Burlington, Alamance County, NC
0T eHY1R0NMeXTAL,IXi Pilot Project3166.1

Drawing 2A
USDA Soil Survey
of Alamance County, NC
Published 1960, Sheets 9 and 10
Not to Scale
P I L O T 9 H Y I A 0 N M I X T A L. I X L
Published Soil Map
Kernodle Landing
Approximate 224-Acre Tract
Burlington, Alamance County, NC
Pilot Project 3166.1

v "
+4
-f i.
i al. +7Yi.1T •.t ..
7 7A, ,i
.4 Illl
i
4 ,,
Drawing 3
USFWS NWI
.P
Wetlands Mapper
Scale: 1" = 800' p'LQ''
IPIL O T ENV R O NMI X T A L, I X L
4
F
ll LEGEND
Site Boundary
Freshwater Emergent
Freshwater Forested/Shrub
Estuarine and Marine Deepwater
Estuarine and Marine
Freshwater Pond
Lake
Riverine
Other
NWI Map
Kernodle Landing
Approximate 224-Acre Tract
Burlington, Alamance County, NC
Pilot Project 3166.1

I
Jaif j 1 �� .iti
..... - - - - - . . . . . .
"
yw
•! � '- .., .� :r ..i -ram— ;... r.. ,
0► W. F'-1
1 mil + RAN
.. 1 •�. ^':�- i � .R•.� pl.:. R.
N-31
4 r�� �;. =Z�r " ' � FLEA + lV9.IIV�11~•r1HL,FL�_ _�C� Hri�;�F,C�r.� :...
YJ
11 'Mc
N.i 5r r�
r ,W.
tj � icy
' `C Y
r " x
o
Yr
LEGEND
050 7 ' o02
�# Site Boundary
1 ��Annual Chance Flood Hazard
Regulatory Floodway
1 Sped @I Floo
:f Area of Undetermined Flood Hazard
�� �;� �� �' .�,s►� �.. � 0.2V.Annual Ghanoe Flood Hazard
F uture Conditions 1 %Annual Chance FI ood Hazard
tt' .` ' ► Area with Reduced Risk Due to Levee
Drawing 4 _ FEMA FIRM
' Kernodle Landin
National Flood Hazard Layer t. r n=i, ..f' g
From FEMA Web Map Service .... 4 - � Approximate 224-Acre Tract
Scale: 1" = 800' PIL01IF Ja Burlington, Alamance County, NC
PILOT 6HYIRONMINTAL,IXL Pilot Project3166.1

Drawing 5.2
Drawing 5.1
FLAG NUMBERS/INFO
WETLAND FLAGS =
STREAM FLAGS =
Stream Flags = 226
Wetland Flags = 304
Total Flags = 530
a*k
Site Boundary
Pond
Stream
Wetland
Data Point
Flag Number/Feature ID
Culvert
THE LOCATIONS OF FEATURES SHOWN ON THIS MAP ARE PRELIMINARY. THEY HAVE NOT BEEN VERIFIED BY THE USACE AND/OR NCDEQ-
DWR. THIS EXHIBIT INCLUDES GPS LOCATIONS OF DELINEATED FEATURES. DELINEATION CONDUCTED BY PILOT PERSONNEL NOVEMBER
15-16, 2017 (TRACT A) AND JANUARY 20, 2020 (TRACTS B AND C).
!� _ M . .4
Drawing 5 f
Wetland Map
Satellite Imagery from ESRI '" Kernodle Landing
and Pilot GPS DataApproximate 224-Acre Tract
Scale: 1" - 900' 'La'Burlington, Alamance County, NC
Date:1.22.20 OT EHYIA0NMIXTAL.IXL Pilot Project3166.1

r
y
SD- WELL DEFINED
(SURVEYOR LOCATE)
SC 1-30
SD
LEGEND
_POMP NOW Site Boundary
FLAG NUMBERS/INFO
Pond
Stream
WETLAND FLAGS = Wetland
STREAM FLAGS = I DP-1 O Data Point
Stream Flags = 226
Wetland Flags - 304 WA 1-5 Flag Number/Feature ID
Total Flags = 530 ■ Culvert
THE LOCATIONS OF FEATURES SHOWN ON THIS MAP ARE PRELIMINARY. THEY HAVE NOT BEEN VERIFIED BY THE USACE AND/OR NCDEQ-
DWR. THIS EXHIBIT INCLUDES GPS LOCATIONS OF DELINEATED FEATURES. DELINEATION CONDUCTED BY PILOT PERSONNEL NOVEMBER
15-16, 2017 (TRACT A) AND JANUARY 20, 2020 (TRACTS B AND C).
� 7
Drawing 5.1 Wetland Map
Kernodle Landing
Satellite Imagery from ESRI
-
Approximate 224-Acre
and Pilot GPS Data Tract
Scale: 1" = 450' PIL01' "' Burlington, Alamance County, NC
Date:1.22.20 1 PILOT 9HYIA0NMIXTAL,IXL Pilot Project3166.1

SF 1-15
SA 1-6
WE 1-112
MSA
(SURVEYOR
LOCATE)
MW/A1-13
DP-5 Q O DP-4 /
DP-3
WEB 1-15
SEB 1-5
WEA 64-82
PE
(SURVEYOR
1 nr ATF)
It ilr .+',
WEA32-54 l/ 4i eKyjL,+r•
� a
1
YI �i
Al-
.Y f
.I
WEA 1-31/ FLAG NUMBERS/INFO
WEA 55-63
WETLAND FLAGS =
STREAM FLAGS =
Stream Flags = 226
Wetland Flags = 304
Total Flags = 530
LEGEND
-22 Site Boundary
Pond
Stream
Wetland
DP-1 Q Data Point
/ WA 1-5 Flag Number/Feature ID
SE 1-95 ■ Culvert
HE LOCATIONS OF FEATURES SHOWN ON THIS MAP ARE PRELIMINARY. THEY HAVE NOT BEEN VERIFIED BY THE USACE AND/OR NCDEQ-
D
TWR. THIS EXHIBIT INCLUDES GPS LOCATIONS OF DELINEATED FEATURES. DELINEATION CONDUCTED BY PILOT PERSONNEL ON NNOVEMBER 15-16, 2017 (TRACT A) AND JANUARY 20, 2020 (TRACTS B AND C).
Drawing 5.2 fPILCT
Wetland Map
Satellite Imagery from ESRIKernodle Landing
and Pilot GPS DataApproximate 224-Acre Tract
Scale: 1" = 450' 'La'' "' Burlington, Alamance County, NC
Date:1.22.20 EHYIRONMINTAL.IXL Pilot Project3166.1

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont
Project/Site: 1664 Gerringer Mill Road (Kernodle Landing) City/County: Burlington/Alamance Sampling Date: 11.15.17
Applicant/Owner: State: NC Sampling Point: DP-1
Investigator(s): M. Brame/D. Brame/Homer/Carston (Pilot Environmental) Section, Township, Range: N/A
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.) Swale Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave
Slope (%): 1 Lat: 36.149593' Long:-79.488880' Datum: WGS 84
Soil Map Unit Name: Enon sandy loan (EnD) NWI Classification: Upland
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology_ significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDING5 — Attacn site map snowing Sampiing point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
within a Wetland? Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Remarks
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
Surface Soil Cracks (136)
Surface Water (Al)
_
True Aquatic Plants (1314)
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
_ High Water Table (A2)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl) _
Drainage Patterns (1310)
X Saturation (A3)
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
Moss Trim Lines (1316)
Water Marks (131)
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (132)
_ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) _
Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Drift Deposits (133)
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Algal Mat or Crust (134)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks) _
Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
Iron Deposits (135)
X
Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_
Shallow Aquitard (D3)
X Water -Stained Leaves (139)
Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
_
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes _ No X
Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No X
Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Saturation Present? Yes X No
Depth (inches): 8
_
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point DP-1
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
1. Platanus occidentalis
Absolute
% Cover
20
Dominant
Species?
Y
Indicator
Status
FACW
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 5 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 7 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
2. Liquidambar styraciflua 15 Y FAC
3.
4
5.
6
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 71% (A/B)
7.
8. Prevalence Index worksheet:
35 = Total Cover Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species x 1 =
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15' ) FACW species X 2 =
1. Liriodendron tulipifera 10 Y FACU FAC species X 3 =
2. Carpinus caroliniana 20 Y FAC
3.
FACU species X 4 =
4 UPL species X 5 =
5. Column Totals: (A) (B)
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
30
= Total Cover
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5' )
1. Microstegium vimineum
60
Y
FAC
2. Carex intumescens
5
N
FACW
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
65
= Total Cover
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
1. Smilax rotundifolia
5
Y
FAC
2. Lonicera japonica
5
Y
FACU
3.
4.
5.
6.
10
= Total Cover
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
ydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
X_2 - Dominance Test is > 50%
_ 3 - Prevalence Test is <_ 3.0'
_4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present. unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm)
or more in diameter at breast height (DBH),
regardless of height.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
Herb -All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes X No

SOIL
Sampling Point: DP-1
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix
Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) %
Color (moist) % Type' Loc2 Texture Remarks
0-4 7.5YR 3/3 100
CL
4-14 10YR 5/2 95
7.5YR 3/4 5 C M CL
'Type: C=Concentration, D=De letion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains.
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric 801ls3:
Histosol (Al)
Dark Surface (S7)
2 cm Muck (A10) (IVILRA 147)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (IVILRA 147, 148)
Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
Black Histic (A3)
Thin Dark Suface (S9) (IVILRA 147, 148)
(IVILRA 147, 148)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
Stratified Layers (A5)
X Depleted Matrix (F3)
(IVILRA 136, 147)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Red Parent Material (TF2)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Redox Depressions (F8)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
Iron Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
IVILRA 147, 148)
IVILRA 136)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (s4)
Sandy Redox (S5)
Umbric Surface (F13) (IVILRA 136, 122) 3Indicators
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (IVILRA 148)
of Hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present, unless
Stripped Matrix (S6)
disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present?
Yes X No
Remarks:

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont
Project/Site: 1664 Gerringer Mill Road (Kernodle Landing) City/County: Burlington/Alamance Sampling Date: 11.15.17
Applicant/Owner: State: NC Sampling Point: DP-2
Investigator(s): M. Brame/D. Brame/Homer/Carston (Pilot Environmental) Section, Township, Range: N/A
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.) Swale Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave
Slope (%): 2 Lat: 36.149829' Long:-79.489044' Datum: WGS 84
Soil Map Unit Name: Cullen clay loam (CnD2) NWI Classification: Upland
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology_ significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
iUMMAKY OF FINDING5 — Attacn site map snowing Sampiing point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No X
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X Is the Sampled Area
within a Wetland? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Remarks
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply) _
Surface Soil Cracks (136)
Surface Water (Al)
True Aquatic Plants (1314)
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
High Water Table (A2)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl) _
Drainage Patterns (1310)
Saturation (A3)
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
Moss Trim Lines (1316)
Water Marks (131)
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (132)
_ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) _
Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Drift Deposits (133)
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Algal Mat or Crust (134)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks) _
Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
Iron Deposits (135)
Geomorphic Position (D2)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_
Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Water -Stained Leaves (139)
_
Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes _ No X
Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No X
Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Saturation Present? Yes No X
Depth (inches):
_
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point DP-2
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
1. Quercus falcata
Absolute
% Cover
15
Dominant
Species?
Y
Indicator
Status
FACU
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 1 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 9 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
2. Fagus grandifolia 15 Y FACU
3.
4
5.
6
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
11% (A/B)
7.
8.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
30
= Total Cover
Total % Cover of:
Multiply by:
OBL species
x 1 =
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15' )
FACW species
X 2 =
1. Juniperus virginiana
5
Y
FACU
FAC species 5
X 3 = 15
2. Carpinus caroliniana
5
Y
FAC
FACU species 59
X 4 = 236
3. Quercus alba
5
Y
FACU
4. Ilex opaca
5
Y
FACU
UPL species
X 5 =
5.
Column Totals: 64
(A) 251 (B)
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
20 = Total Cover
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5' )
1. Allium canadense 2 Y FACU
2. Polystichum acrostichoides 2 Y FACU
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
4 = Total Cover
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
1. Lonicera japonica 10 Y FACU
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
10 = Total Cover
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.92
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
2 - Dominance Test is > 50%
3 - Prevalence Test is <_ 3.0'
_4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present. unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm)
or more in diameter at breast height (DBH),
regardless of height.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
Herb -All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes No X

SOIL
Sampling Point: DP-2
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type, Loc2 Texture Remarks
0-14 5YR 4/6 100 CL
C=Concentration. D=Depletion. RM=Reduced Matrix. CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol (Al)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Black Histic (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Stratified Layers (A5)
2 cm Muck (A10) (I -RR N)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (I -RR N,
IVILRA 147, 148)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (s4)
Sandy Redox (S5)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Type:
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
Dark Surface (S7)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (IVILRA 147, 148)
Thin Dark Suface (S9) (IVILRA 147, 148)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Redox Depressions(F8)
Iron Manganese Masses (F12) (I -RR N,
IVILRA 136)
Umbric Surface (F13) (IVILRA 136, 122)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (IVILRA 148)
Hydric Soil Present?
2Location: PL=Pore Linina. M=Matrix.
Indicators for Problematic Hydric 801ls3:
2 cm Muck (A10) (IVILRA 147)
Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
(IVILRA 147, 148)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(IVILRA 136, 147)
Red Parent Material (TF2)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
3Indicators of Hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present, unless
disturbed or problematic.
Yes No X

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Requiiementcon&VISymbol
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region EXEMPT
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R /Auihoiily. AR 335-15,p8ra9r8ph 5-28/
Project/Site: Kernodle Landing City/County: Burlington/Alamance Sampling Date: 1/20/20
Applicant/Owner: State: NC Sampling Point: DP-3
Investigator(s): Pilot Environmental Section, Township, Range: Ossipee
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): Depression Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave Slope (%): 1
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 36.154377' Long:-79.477991 ° Datum: WGS 84
Soil Map Unit Name: Enon sandy loam (EnC) NWI classification: Riverine
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No within a Wetland? Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
Above average rainfall occurred over the several weeks prior to sampling date
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply) _Surface
Soil Cracks (136)
X Surface Water (Al)
_True Aquatic Plants (1314) X
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
X High Water Table (A2)
—Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl) X
Drainage Patterns (B10)
_Saturation (A3)
_Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) _Moss
Trim Lines (B16)
—Water Marks (B 1)
—Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) _
Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_Sediment Deposits (132)
_Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) _Crayfish
Burrows (C8)
—Drift Deposits (133)
_Thin Muck Surface (C7) _Saturation
Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_Algal Mat or Crust (134)
_Other (Explain in Remarks) _Stunted
or Stressed Plants (D1)
_Iron Deposits (135)
_Geomorphic
Position (D2)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_Shallow
Aquitard (D3)
X Water -Stained Leaves (139)
_
Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
X
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes X
No Depth (inches): 2
Water Table Present? Yes X
No Depth (inches): 0
Saturation Present? Yes X
No Depth (inches): 0
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: DP-3
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 )
1. P/afalms occidenfa/is
2. Befu/a nigra
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
50% of total cover: 20
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15 )
1. P/afalms occidenfa/is
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
50% of total cover: 3
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5 )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
50% of total cover:
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30 )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Absolute
Dominant
Indicator
% Cover
Species?
Status
Dominance Test worksheet:
20
Yes
FACW
Number of Dominant Species
20
Yes
FACW
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata:
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
Prevalence Index worksheet:
40
=Total Cover
Total % Cover of:
20% of total cover:
5 Yes
5 =Total Cover
20% of total cover:
=Total Cover
20% of total cover:
=Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
3 (A)
3 (B)
100.0% (A/B)
Multiply by:
8
OBL species
0
x 1 =
FACW species
45
x 2 =
FACW
FAC species
0
x 3 =
FACU species
0
x 4 =
UPL species
0
x 5 =
Column Totals:
45
(A)
Prevalence Index
= B/A =
0
90
0
0
0
90 (B)
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
X 3 - Prevalence Index is 53.0'
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
1 data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft (1
m) tall.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless of
size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes X No
FORM 6116-4SG, JUL 2018
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.(

SOIL Sampling Point: DP-3
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Types Loc2 Texture Remarks
0-18 10YR 5/2 90 5YR 4/6 10 C M Loamy/Clayey Prominent redox concentrations
Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric 801ls3:
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
—Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
—Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
_ Black Histic (A3)
_ Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
(MLRA 147, 148)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
X Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
—Red Parent Material (F21)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
(outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
X Redox Depressions (F8)
_Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
—Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
—Other (Explain in Remarks)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
MLRA 136)
_
_ Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
wetland hydrology must be present,
Dark Surface (S7)
Red Parent Material (F21) (IVILRA 127, 147, 148)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
Remarks

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Requiiementcon&VISymbol
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region EXEMPT
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R /Auihoiily. AR 335-15,p8ra9r8ph 5-28/
Project/Site: Kernodle Landing City/County: Burlington/Alamance Sampling Date: 1/20/20
Applicant/Owner: State: NC Sampling Point: DP-4
Investigator(s): Pilot Environmental Section, Township, Range: Ossipee
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): Hillside Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave Slope (%): 7
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 36.154527' Long:-79.478091 ° Datum: WGS 84
Soil Map Unit Name: Enon sandy loam (EnC) NWI classification: None
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No X Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X within a Wetland? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
Above average rainfall occurred over the several weeks prior to sampling date
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply) _Surface
Soil Cracks (136)
_Surface Water (Al)
_True Aquatic Plants (1314) _Sparsely
Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
_ High Water Table (A2)
—Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl) —Drainage
Patterns (B10)
_Saturation (A3)
_Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) _Moss
Trim Lines (B16)
—Water Marks (B 1)
—Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) _
Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_Sediment Deposits (132)
_Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) _Crayfish
Burrows (C8)
—Drift Deposits (133)
_Thin Muck Surface (C7) _Saturation
Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_Algal Mat or Crust (134)
_Other (Explain in Remarks) _Stunted
or Stressed Plants (D1)
_Iron Deposits (135)
_Geomorphic
Position (D2)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_Shallow
Aquitard (D3)
—Water-Stained Leaves (139)
_
Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes
No X Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes
No X Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes
No X Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: DP-4
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 )
1. P/afanus occidenfa/is
2. ✓amperus w1g1mana
3. Acerrubrum
4. Pin as faeda
5.
6.
7.
50% of total cover: 25
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15 )
1. P/afanus occidenfa/is
2. ✓amperus w1g1mana
3. Acerrubrum
4. Ilex opaca
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
50% of total cover: 4
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5 )
1. Microsfegium uimineum
2. A//ium canadense
3. Lonicera japonica
4. Smi/axrofundifo/ia
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
50% of total cover: 43
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30 )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Absolute
Dominant
Indicator
% Cover
Species?
Status
20
Yes
FACW
20
Yes
FACU
5
No
FAC
5
No
FAC
20% of total cover:
2 Yes
2 Yes
2 Yes
2 Yes
8 =Total Cover
20% of total cover:
10 No
5 No
85 =Total Cover
20% of total cover:
=Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
4 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata:
8 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
50.0% (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of:
Multiply by:
10
OBL species
0
x 1 =
FACW species
22
x 2 =
FACW
FAC species
67
x 3 =
FACU
FACU species
54
x 4 =
FAC
UPL species
0
x 5 =
FACU
Column Totals:
143
(A)
Prevalence
Index
= B/A =
0
44
201
216
0
461 (B)
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
3 - Prevalence Index is 53.0'
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
2
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
FAC
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
FACU
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
FACU
FAC
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft (1
m) tall.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless of
size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
17
height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes No X
FORM 6116-4SG, JUL 2018
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.(

SOIL Sampling Point: DP-4
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Types Loc2 Texture Remarks
0-18 10YR 5/4 100 Loamy/Clayey
Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric 801ls3:
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
—Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
—Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
_ Black Histic (A3)
_ Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
(MLRA 147, 148)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
—Red Parent Material (F21)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
(outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
—Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
—Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
—Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
—Other (Explain in Remarks)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
MLRA 136)
_
_ Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
wetland hydrology must be present,
Dark Surface (S7)
Red Parent Material (F21) (IVILRA 127, 147, 148)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
Remarks

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Requirementcon&VISymbol
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region F-tHA °T
(Authority,• AR 335-15,
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R p8ra9r8ph5-28)
Project/Site: Kernodle Landing City/County: Burlington/Alamance Sampling Date: 1/20/20
Applicant/Owner: State: NC Sampling Point: DP-5
Investigator(s): Pilot Environmental Section, Township, Range: Ossipee
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): Swale Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave Slope (%): 7
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 36.154589' Long:-79.478717' Datum: WGS 84
Soil Map Unit Name: Enon sandy loam (EnC) NWI classification: Riverine
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X within a Wetland? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
Above average rainfall occurred over the several weeks prior to sampling date
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) _Surface
Soil Cracks (136)
_Surface Water (Al)
_True Aquatic Plants (B14) _Sparsely
Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
X High Water Table (A2)
—Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl) X
Drainage Patterns (1310)
_Saturation (A3)
_Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) _Moss
Trim Lines (B16)
—Water Marks (B 1)
—Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) _
Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_Sediment Deposits (132)
_Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) _Crayfish
Burrows (C8)
_ Drift Deposits (133)
_Thin Muck Surface (C7) _Saturation
Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_Algal Mat or Crust (134)
_Other (Explain in Remarks) _Stunted
or Stressed Plants (D1)
_Iron Deposits (135)
_Geomorphic
Position (D2)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_Shallow
Aquitard (D3)
X Water -Stained Leaves (139)
_
Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes
No X Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes X
No Depth (inches): 4
Saturation Present? Yes X
No Depth (inches): 4
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
LFORM 61164SG JUL 2018
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: DP-5
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 )
1. L11 odendron fu/ipifera
2. Acerrubrum
3. Quercus sfe//afa
4. Quercus a/ba
5.
6.
7.
50% of total cover: 33
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15 )
1. Liquidambarsfyraciflua
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
50% of total cover: 3
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5 )
1. Microsfegium uimineum
2. A//ium canadense
3. Lonicera japonica
4. Smi/axrofundifo/ia
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
50% of total cover: 45
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30 )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Absolute
Dominant
Indicator
% Cover
Species?
Status
25
Yes
FACU
20
Yes
FAC
10
No
UPL
10
No
FACU
20% of total cover:
5 Yes
5 =Total Cover
20% of total cover:
10 No
5 No
90 =Total Cover
20% of total cover:
=Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
3 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata:
4 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
75.0% (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of:
Multiply by:
13
FAC
OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
FACW species 0 x 2 = 0
FAC species 95 x 3 = 285
FACU species 55 x 4 = 220
UPL species 10 x 5 = 50
Column Totals: 160 (A) 555 (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.47
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
3 - Prevalence Index is 53.0'
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
1
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
FAC
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
FACU
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
FACU
FAC
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft (1
m) tall.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless of
size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
18
height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes X No
FORM 6116-4SG, JUL 2018
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.(

SOIL Sampling Point: DP-5
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Types Loc2 Texture Remarks
0-8 10YR 5/4 100 Loamy/Clayey
8-18 10YR 5/3 90 5YR 4/6 10 C M Loamy/Clayey Prominent redox concentrations
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion,
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol (Al)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Black Histic (A3)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11:
—Thick Dark Surface (Al 2)
—Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
Dark Surface (S7)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
RM=Reduced Matrix. MS=Masked Sand Grains.
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (IVILRA 147, 148)
—Thin Dark Surface (S9) (IVILRA 147, 148)
_ Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (IVILRA 136)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Redox Depressions(F8)
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
IVILRA 136)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (IVILRA 122, 136)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (IVILRA 148)
Red Parent Material (F21) (IVILRA 127, 147, 148)
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soil
2 cm Muck (A10) (IVILRA 147)
—Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
(IVILRA 147, 148)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(IVILRA 136, 147)
_Red Parent Material (F21)
(outside IVILRA 127, 147, 148)
_Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X