20141149 Ver 7_Year 4 Monitoring Report_2021 DRAFT (Buffer)_20211112

Mitigation Project Information Upload
ID#* 20141149 Version* 7
.........................................................................................................................................................................
Select Reviewer:*
Katie Merritt
Initial Review Completed Date 11/19/2021
Mitigation Project Submittal - 11/12/2021
......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
Is this a Prospectus,Technical Proposal or a New Site?* 0 Yes O No
Type of Mitigation Project:*
Stream Wetlands Buffer Nutrient Offset
(Select all that apply)
Project Contact Information
Contact Name:* Email Address:*
Raymond Holz [e-mail]
Project Information
......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
ID#:* 20141149 Version:*
Existing ID# Existing Version
Project Type: DMS • Mitigation Bank
Project Name: Orphan Creek
County: Alamance
Document Information
......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
Mitigation Document Type:*
Mitigation Monitoring Report
File Upload: 2014-1149-V7 Draft Orphan Creek Buffer and
2.6MB
NOC_2021 MY4_.pdf
Please upload only one PDF of the complete file that needs to be submitted...
Signature
...................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
Print Name:* Raymond Holz
Signature:*

YEAR 4(2021)
MONITORING REPORT
Orphan Creek Bank Parcel
DWR#20141149 version 7
Pursuant to:
Restoration Systems' Phase One Haw River WS Umbrella Banking Instrument for
Riparian Buffer and Nutrient Offset Mitigation Credits
ip.a'. .y
•
h
AiL.It , �_.
,. '" Via'
i � •,, ' 17,
a
ir
a
a L.,- ri- h .' " ,. rw'j• lea' ..�1,-
� - _ :' aces J
4 47 � ' I ' �:
w ' i �a �y r .fa a �p�)• ki , 6, , r , ,
.
PREPARED BY:
RsRESTORATION SYSTEMS, LLC
1101 HAYNES STREET,SUITE 211
RESTORATION RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27604
SYSTEMS I LLC
AND
,` AXIOM ENVIRONMENTAL, INC.
218 SNOW AVENUE
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27603
Axiom Environmental,Inc.
November 2021

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Restoration Systems, LLC(RS) has established the Orphan Creek Bank Parcel(Parcel), proposed as part of
the Restoration Systems' Phase One Haw River WS Umbrella Banking Instrument (Banking Instrument)
signed October 25, 2017, between Restoration Systems and the North Carolina Division of Water
Resources(DWR). Per the Jordan Lake Water Supply Nutrient Strategy, Consolidated Mitigation Rule, and
Nutrient Offset Payments (15A NCAC 02B .0267, 15A NCAC 02B .0268, 15A NCAC 02B .0295, & 15A NCAC
02B .0240), this Parcel is designed to provide riparian buffer mitigation and nutrient offset credits for
unavoidable impacts due to development within the Haw River Sub-watershed of Jordan Lake in the Cape
Fear River Basin. Supporting figures are included in Appendix B.
The Parcel was evaluated on December 16, 2014, by Virginia Baker of DWR. Ms. Baker's evaluation was
part of an inter-agency review, including the US Army Corps of Engineers,to determine if stream features
located within the Site are applicable to provide compensatory stream mitigation under Restoration
Systems' Cape Fear 02 Phase One Umbrella Banking Instrument (Orphan Creek USACE Action ID SAW-
2015-01698). Riparian areas adjacent to features providing compensatory mitigation for stream impacts
were restored and provide riparian buffer mitigation and nutrient offset credit.
The Parcel was planned and designed according to the Banking Instrument with DWR, 15A NCAC 02B
.0240, and the Consolidated Mitigation Rule 15A NCAC 02B .0295, which became effective on November
1, 2015. The BPDP was designed in concurrence with the Orphan Creek Stream and Wetland Mitigation
Bank(SAW#2015-01698).The mitigation plan for the Orphan Creek Stream and Wetland Mitigation Bank,
along with the Stream and Wetland Umbrella Mitigation Banking Instrument, was approved by the
Interagency Review Team on July, 6th 2017. The Section 404 permit (Clean Water Act, 33 USC 1344) was
granted by the US Army Corps of Engineers on June 30,2017,the corresponding Section 401 Water Quality
Certification was granted on June 28, 2017, and the land quality letter of approval was granted June 20,
2017.
Project construction and planting were completed between October 30, 2017, and December 22, 2017.
Baseline monitoring data was collected between mid-and late March 2018. Site-work involved restoring
and enhancing riparian buffers and other riparian areas adjacent to mitigated streams onsite to reduce
non-point source contaminant discharges to downstream waters in the Haw River sub-watershed of
Jordan Lake. All the riparian areas were assessed by DWR during an onsite visit to determine viability for
buffer mitigation and nutrient offset. During the site visit, all riparian areas were confirmed to have been
in pasture for cattle grazing. Approximately 7.01 acres will be protected with a permanent conservation
easement.Of those 7.01 acres,4.52 acres were restored for Jordan riparian buffer credit,0.22 acres were
restored for nutrient offset credit, and 1.74 acres were enhanced by removing cattle from the streams
riparian areas for Jordan riparian buffer credit.
In general, riparian restoration/enhancement area widths on streams extend out to a maximum of 100
feet from the top of stream banks (TOB)with a minimum width of 30 feet. Riparian buffer enhancement
credits generated on this Bank Parcel are allowed pursuant to 15A NCAC 02B .0295 (o)(6) but cannot be
used to generate nutrient offset credits. Additionally, no riparian restoration areas that are less than 50
feet wide from TOB can be used to generate nutrient offset credit. Therefore, the maximum acreage of
riparian restoration on this Site that can be converted into nutrient offset credits, if needed by RS, is 4.52
acres. Figure 3(Appendix B)shows the Credit Determination Map,and Section 2.0 details the Bank Parcel's
mitigation determination.
Year 4 (2021) vegetation sampling occurred on September 29, 2021. Stem density across the Parcel was
above the required average density,with 665 planted tree stems per acre (excluding livestakes) surviving
Orphan Creek Bank Parcel Year 4(2021)Monitoring Report Executive Summary page i
Phase One Haw River WS Umbrella Bank Restoration Systems,LLC

Orphan Creek Bank Parcel Year 4 (2021) Monitoring Report Executive Summary page ii
Phase One Haw River WS Umbrella Bank Restoration Systems, LLC
in year 4 (2021). Five additional temporary transects were also measured during year 4 (2021). The
transects yielded an average stem density of 810 stems per acre, thus increasing the site average stem
density to 725 stems per acre. In addition, all plots and transects exceeded success criteria. Plot and
transect locations are depicted in Figure 2 (Appendix B), and all vegetation data is located in Appendix C.

The inter-agency review team members did not conduct a site visit as part of the Year 3 (2020) annual
monitoring effort for the 404/401 mitigation activities located within the Parcel. Further, no comments
were provided by the IRT.

2019 Maintenance Summary:
A single herbicide application was performed during the 2019 growing season. The target species was
Japanese Stiltgrass (Microstegium vimineum), and treatment occurred around UT-4 and UT-5. Further
detail about the herbicide application is summarized in Table 7 of Appendix C.

2020 Maintenance Summary:
Invasive Species Work Maintenance Work
May 12, 2020, September 10, 2020, and
September 17, 2020

Japanese Stiltgrass, Cattail, Johnson Grass,
Sweetgum, Multiflora Rose, Privet, Russian Olive
February 20, 2020 - large tree removal from
easement fence and fence repair. No cattle
encroachment.

2021 Maintenance Summary:
Invasive Species Work Maintenance Work
6/30/2021
Privet, Multiflora Rose, Russian Olive, Callery
Pear, Sweetgum, Honeysuckle

07/06/2021
Cattail, Multiflora Rose, Johnson Grass,
Sweetgum, Privet

10/14/2021
Fescue, Multiflora Rose, Privet, Sweetgum,
Autumn Olive, Callery Pear
None

General Notes
• No encroachment was identified in Year 4
• No evidence of nuisance animal activity (i.e., beaver, heavy deer browsing, etc.) was observed.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
1.0 PROJECT GOALS, BACKGROUND,AND ATTRIBUTES 1
1.1 Location and Setting 1
1.2 Project Goals and Objectives 1
2.0 MITIGATION POTENTIAL 1
3.0 MONITORING AND MAINTENANCE PLAN 3
3.1 Monitoring Protocol 3
3.2 Parcel Maintenance 4
4.0 REFERENCES 5
APPENDICES
Appendix A. Background Tables
Table 2. Project Activity and Reporting History
Table 3. Project Contacts Table
Table 4. Project Baseline Information &Attributes
Appendix B. Figures
Figure 1. Site Location &Service Area
Figure 2. Current Conditions Plan View
Figure 3. Credit Determination
Figure 4. Potential Conversion of Wetland Credit to Riparian Buffer Credit
Appendix C.Vegetation Data
Table 5. Planted Bare Root Woody Vegetation
Table 6.Total Planted Stems by Plot and Species
Table 7.Temporary Vegetation Transect Data
Vegetation Plot Photographs
Appendix D. Delivered Credit Yield Table for Jordan Sub Watersheds
Appendix E.Year 4(2021) Planted Stem Height Data
Orphan Creek Bank Parcel Year 4(2021)Monitoring Report Table of Contents page i
Phase One Haw River WS Umbrella Bank Restoration Systems,LLC

1.0 PROJECT GOALS, BACKGROUND, AND ATTRIBUTES
1.1 Location and Setting
Restoration Systems, LLC (RS) established the Orphan Creek Bank Parcel (Parcel) as part of the RS' Phase
One Haw River WS Umbrella Banking Instrument(Banking Instrument)signed October 25, 2017, between
Restoration Systems and the North Carolina Division of Water Resources (DWR).
The Parcel encompasses 7.01 acres of land located 2000 feet north of Payne Road and Salem Church Road.
Before construction, the Site was characterized by hay fields and livestock pasture; livestock had
unrestricted access to the Site's streams resulting in deeply incised streams and direct non-point source
inputs, including livestock waste. A narrow riparian fringe had developed on the stream margins
composed of opportunistic species and a few mature trees. Located in the South Atlantic/Gulf Region
approximately 2 miles north of Saxapahaw, NC and 7 miles southeast of Graham, NC, in eastern Alamance
County (Figure 1, Appendix B), the Parcel is hydrologically situated within the USGS 14-digit HUC and
Targeted Local Watershed 03030002050010 of the Cape Fear River Basin and Jordan Lake's Haw Sub-
Watershed (DWR Subbasin Number 03-06-02). The main hydrologic features include four unnamed
tributaries (UT)to Meadow Creek and adjacent floodplains.
Directions to Parcel (from Saxapahaw):
• From Church Rd. and Jordan Dr. intersection, go north on Jordan Dr.—0.1 mile
• Jordan Dr. becomes Saxapahaw Bethlehem Church Rd.—1.8 miles
• Turn right on Payne Rd.—0.7 mile
• The Site is on the left; access site using the driveway to barn and agriculture fields.
Site Coordinates: 35.978992, -79.315216
1.2 Project Goals and Objectives
According to the Final Cape Fear River Basin Restoration Priorities (NCEEP 2009), this watershed should
be targeted for restoration to protect the nutrient-sensitive waters that ultimately drain into the nutrient-
sensitive water supply of Jordan Lake.Overall,the purpose of the Orphan Creek Buffer and Nutrient Offset
Bank is to restore, enhance, and preserve riparian buffers and other riparian areas adjacent to mitigated
streams onsite. The riparian restoration and enhancement work will improve water quality within the
Parcel and the downstream watershed. The Parcel is located in a region of the state dominated by
agriculture and livestock;restoration of the riparian buffer is expected to result in immediate water quality
benefits within the vicinity of the Parcel through the removal of livestock access to Parcel streams.
Primary goals focus on 1) improving water quality, 2) enhancing flood attenuation and hydrology, 3)
improving aquatic resources, and 4) restoring riparian habitat. Mitigation activities provide floodplain
connectivity/resistance, stream stability, sediment transport, surface/subsurface storage/retention, in-
stream habitat, riparian habitat/structure, thermal regulation, floodplain biogeochemical processing,
pollutant filtration, and pollutant source removal.
2.0 MITIGATION POTENTIAL
The Orphan Creek Bank Parcel provides Jordan buffer mitigation and nutrient offset credits for
development impacts within the Haw River Sub-watershed of Jordan Lake. The width of the credit
generation area begins at the most landward limit of the TOB or the rooted herbaceous vegetation and
extends landward a maximum distance of 200 feet where applicable.A maximum of 4.52 acres of riparian
Orphan Creek Bank Parcel Year 4(2021)Monitoring Report page 1
Phase One Haw River WS Umbrella Bank Restoration Systems,LLC

restoration on this Site can be converted and transferred from Riparian Buffer Credits to Nutrient Offset
Credits and from Nutrient Offset Credit back to Riparian Buffer Credits upon approval and does not include
any of the acreage being mitigated to generate wetland mitigation credit. The Sponsor must submit a
written request and receive written approval from DWR before any credit conversions and transfers to
the buffer and nutrient credit ledgers.All delivery factors shall be applied to nutrient offset credits before
requesting a conversion.
According to the nutrient reduction goals for the Haw River arm of Jordan Lake, the generated nitrogen
credits per acre in the Haw Sub-watershed for riparian restoration on agricultural land is 2249.36 pounds,
and the generated phosphorus credit per acre is 143.81 pounds.The delivery factors applied to this Parcel
are 74 percent for nitrogen and 68 percent for phosphorus (Appendix D). Delivered credits are calculated
by applying the delivery factors and the acreage of riparian restoration to the generated credits per acre
stated above. Based on the asbuilt report, Jordan riparian buffer and nutrient offset (Nitrogen and
Phosphorus) credits for the Orphan Creek Bank Parcel are summarized in Table 1 and the corresponding
Figure 3 (Appendix B).
The Sponsor will maintain 4 credit ledgers for the Parcel under the Banking Instrument and BPDP: (1) for
buffer restoration mitigation credits in both square feet and acres, (1)for buffer enhancement mitigation
credits in square feet and acres, (1) accounting for nitrogen offset credits in pounds and acres, and (1)
accounting for phosphorus offset credits in pounds and acres.
The Sponsor may elect to use riparian areas for either buffer mitigation credit or wetland mitigation credit,
but not both.The Sponsor must submit a written request and receive written approval from DWR before
any credit conversions and transfers to the buffer credit ledger.As part of that request,the Sponsor must
provide DWR with a written acceptance letter from the USACE, accompanied by supporting documents,
for any wetlands that they want removed from the wetland mitigation bank. Only riparian areas that fail
to generate wetland credit may be viable for generating riparian buffer credit. Figure 3 (Appendix B)
depicts riparian areas that could generate riparian buffer credit if they don't qualify for wetland mitigation
credits. Figure 4 (Appendix B) represents the potential conversion of failed wetland mitigation credits to
riparian buffer credits. Any areas proposed for buffer mitigation credit must meet the performance
standards detailed in 15A NCAC 02B .0295.
Table 1.Jordan Lake: Haw River Sub-Watershed Credit Determination Table
14 Digit Watershed ID:03030002050010
Riparian Buffer Mitigation Units
*Buffer
Mitigation Percentage of
Width Credit Type* Total Area Mitigation Units
from TOB Ratio Full Credit
196,725.78 ft2 196,725.78 ft2
TOB-100 ft Restoration 1:1 100%
(4.52 ac) (4.52 ac)
TOB 100 ft Enhancement via Cattle Exclusion 75,686.90 ft2 2:1 100% 37,843.45 ft2
(15A NCAC 02B.0295(o)(6) (1.74 ac) (0.87 ac)
Total Riparian Buffer Mitigation Units 234,660.23 ft2
(5.39 ac)
Orphan Creek Bank Parcel Year 4(2021)Monitoring Report page 2
Phase One Haw River WS Umbrella Bank Restoration Systems,LLC

Table 1.Jordan Lake: Haw River Sub-Watershed Credit Determination Table(continued)
Nutrient Offset Credits
**Buffer Generated
Width Credit Type Mitigation Total Credits per Generated Delivery Delivered Credits
from TOB Type Acreage Acre Credits Factor
101-200 ft Nitrogen Restoration 0.22 2,249.36 lbs/ac 494.86 74% 366.20
Phosphoru 101-200 ft Restoration 0.22 143.81 lbs/ac 31.64 66% 20.88
*TOB-20 ft= Buffer is less than 20 ft from the TOB and therefore qualifies for no credit.
TOB-29 ft= Buffer width is contiguous from TOB, is a minimum of 20 ft from the TOB and a maximum of 29 ft from
the TOB, and qualifies for 75%credit.
TOB-100 ft= Buffer width is contiguous from TOB, is a minimum of 29 ft from the TOB and a maximum of 100 ft
from the TOB,and qualifies for 100%credit.
101-200' = Buffer width is contiguous from TOB, is a minimum of 101 ft from the TOB and a maximum of 200 ft
from the TOB,and qualifies for 33%credit.
**Buffer mitigation credits are sought from TOB to 100'. Beyond buffer credit generating areas, RS is proposing
nutrient offset credits out to a maximum of 200'for a contiguous riparian restoration from TOB to 200'where
possible.
3.0 MONITORING AND MAINTENANCE PLAN
3.1 Monitoring Protocol
Restoration monitoring procedures for riparian vegetation will include periodic visual inspection and
annual plant survival and species diversity survey reports. Quantitative sampling of vegetation will be
performed as outlined in CVS Level 1-2 Protocol for Recording Vegetation, Version 4.2 (Lee et al. 2008).
Photos will be taken from all photo points each monitoring year and provided in the annual reports. All
planted stems in the plots will be marked with flagging tape and recorded. Detailed qualitative and
quantitative monitoring is proposed for vegetated riparian areas. Marsh treatment areas will be visually
inspected periodically and reported qualitatively within the annual monitor report as required. Reporting
will include a photographic record of the Parcel's assets.
Monitoring of the restoration efforts will be performed for five years or until success criteria are fulfilled.
Each monitoring year, RS shall submit an annual monitoring report to DWR no later than December 31.
Quantitative monitoring includes measurements of 7-10x10 meter, permanent vegetation plots (3.2% of
restoration and nutrient offset credit areas). Plots were randomly placed throughout the planted riparian
areas and are representative of credit generating areas. Sampling of vegetation will be performed in the
Fall of each year; monitoring data can be found in Appendix C.
During the first year, planted vegetation received a cursory visual evaluation to ascertain the degree of
overtopping of planted trees by nuisance species. Success criteria within the riparian buffer and nutrient
offset restoration areas will be based on the survival of planted species at a density of 260 stems per acre
after five years of monitoring. A minimum of four native hardwood tree and shrub species must be
present, with no one species representing greater than 50% of the stems. In addition, appropriate
volunteer stems of native hardwood tree and shrub species may be included to meet the final
performance standard of 260 stems per acre upon DWR approval.
Orphan Creek Bank Parcel Year 4(2021)Monitoring Report page 3
Phase One Haw River WS Umbrella Bank Restoration Systems,LLC

A visual assessment of the cattle exclusion and preservation areas within the conservation easement will
also be performed each year to confirm:
• Fencing is in good condition throughout the Site;
• No cattle access within the conservation easement area;
• No encroachment has occurred;
• Diffuse flow is being maintained in the conservations easement area; and
• There has not been any cutting, clearing, filling, grading, or similar activities that would
negatively affect the function of the restored buffer.
3.2 Parcel Maintenance
2019 Maintenance Summary:
A single herbicide application was performed during the 2019 growing season.The target species was
Japanese Stiltgrass(Microstegium vimineum),and treatment occurred around UT-4 and UT-5. Further
detail about the herbicide application is summarized in Table 7 of Appendix C.
2020 Maintenance Summary:
Invasive Species Work Maintenance Work
May 12, 2020,September 10,2020,and
September 17, 2020 February 20,2020-large tree removal from
easement fence and fence repair. No cattle
Japanese Stiltgrass,Cattail,Johnson Grass, encroachment.
Sweetgum, Multiflora Rose, Privet, Russian Olive
2021 Maintenance Summary:
Invasive Species Work Maintenance Work
6/30/2021
Privet, Multiflora Rose, Russian Olive,Callery
Pear,Sweetgum, Honeysuckle
07/06/2021
Cattail, Multiflora Rose,Johnson Grass, None
Sweetgum, Privet
10/14/2021
Fescue, Multiflora Rose, Privet,Sweetgum,
Autumn Olive,Callery Pear
Orphan Creek Bank Parcel Year 4(2021)Monitoring Report page 4
Phase One Haw River WS Umbrella Bank Restoration Systems,LLC

4.0 REFERENCES
Griffith, G.E., JM Omernik, J.A. Comstock, M.P. Schafale, W.H. McNab, D.R. Lenat, T.F. MacPherson, J.B.
Glover, and VB Shelbourne. 2002. Ecoregions of North Carolina and South Carolina. US Geological
Survey, Reston,Virginia.
Jordan Lake Water Supply Watershed Buffer Rules 15A NCAC 02B .0267, 15A NCAC 02B .0268, and 15A
NCAC 02B .0295
Lee, M.T., R.K. Peet, SD. Roberts, and T.R. Wentworth. 2008. CVS-EEP Protocol for Recording Vegetation,
Level 1-2 Plot Version 4.2. Ecosystem Enhancement Program, North Carolina Department of
Environment and Natural Resources.
North Carolina Division of Water Quality (NCDWQ). 2005. Cape Fear River Basinwide Water Quality Plan.
Available: http://portal.ncdenr.org/c/document_library/get_file?uuid=2eddbd59-b382-4b58-
97ed-c4049bf4e8e4&groupld=38364. North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural
Resources, Raleigh, North Carolina.
North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP 2009). Cape Fear River Basin Restoration
Priorities 2009 (online). Available: http://portal.ncdenr.org/c/document_library/get_file?uuid=
864e82e8-725c-415e-8ed9-c72dfcb55012&groupld=60329
Schafale, M.P. and A.S. Weakley. 1990. Classification of the Natural Communities of North Carolina: Third
Approximation. North Carolina Natural Heritage Program, Division of Parks and Recreation, NC
Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources. Raleigh, North Carolina.
Orphan Creek Bank Parcel Year 4(2021)Monitoring Report page 5
Phase One Haw River WS Umbrella Bank Restoration Systems,LLC

Appendix A.
Background Tables
Table 2. Project Activity and Reporting History
Table 3. Project Contacts Table
Table 4. Project Baseline Information &Attributes
Orphan Creek Bank Parcel Year 4(2021)Monitoring Report Appendices
Phase One Haw River WS Umbrella Bank Restoration Systems,LLC

Table 2: Project Activity and Reporting History
Activity/Milestone BPDP Proposed Date Actual Date
BPDP Approved NA January 22,2018
Parcel Protection via conservation easement NA October 18,2016
Easement Assignment to Land Trust NA August 31,2017
Cattle exclusion/fence construction NA March 2018
Planting NA March 14th, 2018
As-Built Data Collection NA March 5th—23rd 2018
As-Built Report Submittal NA July 2018
Year 1 (2018) Monitoring October 2018 December 2018
Year 2 (2019) Monitoring October 2019 December 2019
Year 3 (2020) Monitoring October 2020 November 2020
Year 4(2021) Monitoring October 2021 November 2021
Table 3: Project Contacts Table
Firm POC&Address
1101 Haynes Street,Suite 211
Bank Sponsor Restoration Systems, LLC Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
George Howard and John Preyer
919.755.9490
Designer: Axiom Environmental, Inc. Grant Lewis; 919.215.1693
218 Snow Ave. Raleigh, NC 27603
Lloyd Glover; 919.422.3392
Construction Contractor: Strader Fencing Inc 1780 Landmark Road
Willow Spring, NC 27592-7756
Mary-Margaret McKinney 252.482.8491
Planting Contractor: Carolina Silvics 908 Indian Trail Road
Edenton, NC 27932
Lloyd Glover; 919.422.3392
Seeding Contractor: Land Mechanics, Inc. 780 Landmark Road
Willow Spring, NC 27592-7756
Nursery Stock Suppliers: ArborGen 1.888.888.7158
Baseline Data Collection& Grant Lewis; 919.215.1693
Annual Monitoring Axiom Environmental, Inc. 218 Snow Ave. Raleigh, NC 27603
Orphan Creek Bank Parcel Year 4(2021)Monitoring Report Appendices
Phase One Haw River WS Umbrella Bank Restoration Systems,LLC

Table 4: Project Baseline Information &Attributes Table
Project Information
Project Name Orphan Creek
County Alamance
Project Area (acres) 7.01
Project Coordinates(latitude and longitude) Latitude: 35°58'45.7" N , Longitude:79°19'00.1"W
Project Watershed Summary Information
Physiographic Province Piedmont
River Basin Cape Fear
USGS Hydrologic Unit 8-digit 03030002 USGS Hydrologic Unit 14-digit 03030002050010
DWQ Sub-basin 03-06-02
Project Drainage Area,Total Outfall (miles) 0.20 mi2
Project Drainage Area Percentage of Impervious Area < 1%
CGIA Land Use Classification Pasture and Forest Land
Orphan Creek Bank Parcel Year 4(2021)Monitoring Report Appendices
Phase One Haw River WS Umbrella Bank Restoration Systems,LLC

Appendix B.
Figures
Figure 1. Site Location &Service Area
Figure 2. Current Conditions Plan View
Figure 3. Credit Determination
Figure 4. Potential Conversion of Wetland Credit to Riparian Buffer Credit
Orphan Creek Bank Parcel Year 4(2021)Monitoring Report Appendices
Phase One Haw River WS Umbrella Bank Restoration Systems,LLC

r _ ti .... �YancegaHle' 2
S l Ito, — ... L.: +�/ ass :, orfi,.r F Vim_ .._.aaeuni �s2 ,�rR° �°
o� �I ` N
. . ,.:._
..�reYYY _- abi ' - -...\ e.
• ►� r s t3k I — — • 1 4,,, _ ,_ ,...x,,,
Piri4
Moon�gm F\ k
•
a r @_ 5 13tt f .. rJ - k j. IL
.= im —
Pine Hail it t
•
, Air. i lik
it
Wahrat Cove
� , r
r 72.
* ;' � iir / ,' >• a.so"co . Axiom Eno rOrasenial.lrlc,
'! 1 ■ '
'� _�e urd1e Mills • r .
nr.'Ie7cka e:: i ` a S
Y. __- !rh IL 4t. �� r�• ! -._,,r,.,.s� "�. - Prepared for:
I Bel Croak._ _ + ,... -
UK /r - Stoke ,.I. .. .. .pr + .:'" 4�k a ilk '.
i.
i ' Sbm"'e""'" m° Bank Parcel Location, „....„:„,"/"L 46 �f -CO
�
USGS 14-digit HUC ! r
aeallre,l°wn .k •.k Rid u;:r 'r'� 03030002050010 [
�'-.t 9e �;Frr. 1.::!. ��sra:r - ' �"� Y. RESTORATION
,� , -'�: •- Cedar, B,.nama .. !
L eviev SYSTEMS 1 LLC
La 4823 Salem Church Road "- - '"
r
r _ 3,1:"� Haw River, NC 27258 �;- `''`
Project:
svrlle �I h-r• "town '
__ _ 35.979398°N, 79.315874°W
m" ili. bile r.y?.,�. L agile aih,r•n...e c r.r
- "Ilene 13urling,c war Mebane raj n� ORPHAN CREEK
. . Plag��-- E' . _ . ,..„1 BANK PARCEL
�� - ,Greco wn��1,�" - Graharn _Cu �"lim —
-r.r- seaa::a -aC a 44 --`- -
_ - r _ - rSa'hnlan+� � ej ate- tr. -„y, Alamance County, NC
1 �rr rr •. as `s , s
r
!o., ou• 5•N:,,, �F ,.. 85 i�' • Title:
a ti
Eli r � 1--..pumam SITE LOCATION
L, flik rAlitv#1.4
r�� :� �` _ ! _ AND
*icelifli -
, Iq,;,,,,,3a-ve" F,y` _y-:! S�I' c +J[unlain _ •, SERVICE AREA� y�"ti_+y rd, Cer.e gee _� _
. -• ��i' �1•�' ," � _ `FW!��t ensCa_ i�]li^--3 SaaaPa have �<- �' .
r t a ■ •� A s P 1 I:
z � 1. ( -4 Notes:
1 n' -
[sa �.r1,i _" _/' -arc-`-`'-Pro _, 1.Background Imagery Source:
ar-.fLsr ,,
L c r""`y r Y = E .5nr.vGamv DeLorme World Basemap
..
�F n .71iwn�e,.i11r _ :r`� °` _ .F"iI3 r - ., , -��.. Ra`JH f (2014)
_ry
..,,i .
.. .. , i
4 �_ li 1 f--4 a
_ , J � 1 'v' ^ '- Labe rh'
85
4tE„:'''.. , ,._ • A_ - ' ``Y - `�Main-=11. y,,
;:fitt. ii
. __ - rr- , ,,,,
>1'''''''''''... fg. `,� N.Nra a _ ;s,::
ifit '
.Threetlal •-.. ct Sheph Pa, � 3 t �`, �* ` 4_ -- '�''�- i
. �► � Drawn by: KRJ
Magmata = S
�� `• r �'�;t+ ilfr.I .
;�► °� `�� �' Date: SEPT 2016
" r. 22C6 _ �C sii-c4 Mountain ----_. y` s
w. a Plllstmrn ..A.pea 0
I'■ r=heworo• f �1 ` Scale: 1:3500
r3lrrc, Li
;II;'c..-.r I 16-017
T. # .4 . 421 a Project No.:
I�
Legend �� H IP
r
• iiti1
i 1"Jordan Lake 14-digit USGS HUCs �� r tF`
k°Ity sprig FIGURE
Parcel Service Area Haw River Subwatershed �+ >. . p \-C7
�� < � .1 :Haw River Subwatershed `�. J use �/ ' w, v.a M.�,��..
#ff Graf CrNk J rYieq. r ^ .
s , = r Shearon Harris 1c3_
New Hope Creek Subwatershed � Re;.eno�
fr J .Lee.'.
%1 s V ' 1 Fuqua fn�_ w
0 5 10 20 30 40 � r -zMiles �-,� G.! _) /f ='_,�. .-. .- .: ii
1 _ r'i���t i+�� /1 - .' " - / .. ?__ Copyright:©2014 DeLlorme

4
V. — .
1 ,, ,-7,-:- ._ • ... - -:•-•1','. 4;.vir443. ,.iitit 1..t •',.• ' .'t4114 'it ''' ...._ '-.;-
y. "� 3 i r ; k^'
''-T m . yid, c r• ;gal••'• - t .P .•i,
,,;...,,I ,,. •. „ ..-6+ NY. i''-.4.INtif,,,.. , . -, •. 1:1141k%L'..:. ,;,. "-•• , 1" . 41. *dp i r. li - %,
it
• ,' ' '' ' "4A.- •- .,' —I,i--.7' I-- z '''‘'" - • -i-. -..'•••• I•I ._.1 11' ''.q
-'Y•. , 4 f• ys:!'j' '`1 5,`-".g. � '.r. •S- / k
, Axiom Environmenial,Inc,
.:P IA . ;'• • • Ai+' •. P.. + Prepared for:
Wy �ir
{{ Air
f . `k "• - ' +r e'PI' �'
2
t.* . .. ,
ti �'.
r
r_:• y U;" 7iS ••'t'..t14.. ,- 7.F,]:;. • ' r:•k. 4:0 RESTORATION
. f + -1.n "�:ca _ '. SYSTEMS f LLC
. I.1 . �414I ' ,, z �' " ti Project:
y • eS`. y C..YiY•J:. Fir
ir� : `I - ,�; ► �fi' ORPHAN CREEK
{ BANK;r PARCEL
► i tom'
f Alamance County, NC
5 F ::� _ - gat � • Title:
I . ��' ' r::v zr ' ti
Y shV
_ y- �� �y CURRENT
4 3 _ .; .
*— CONDITIONS
6 PLAN VIEW
ram :.: `
a }� �, 4... n� +
•
{ 1 - i
t , - q1 3 } - - Drawn by:
KRJ/CLF
e 7 Date:
OCT 2021
likl:. ...
,� �J Scale:
•
. ; ` Project No.::V+ M•d � fi'i•Ir i ,� V,• . Y. .. •- .r
16-017Le end
! ' Ti. .._"7--.- 'L.T
_ Orphan Creek Easement=7.0 ac ! - ' -• 7.. - . , as-
Stream Channel(Design) '` • ;F ' ' =F: - • FIGURE
Wetland Enhancement=0.1 ac ►- •_r.; . r
CVS Plots ../! .e '
Temporary Vegetation Transects . : -
•\. •• Nr� 2
,,.1.-
0 75 150 300 450
Feet

# •44
N
t
WA 4
i 4 _r
l
-, 41 Axiom Environmenia Pnc,
jot . 4
„.d-'"'"� 1' :':4.-,fJ�ji�2�� "}�, �. pf �, r r �' o Prepared for:
f �f die - ....c
( _•_ : • is,.,{r.r,', r`4r,. • ,, . . },•�'+ i 7 •,+.. ,..fi •` .Ll• I' • .. • -- !'� y -ma y .T rr r �.
re
r -4-ir, S
' ' • k,.:i 5i r ,.i t �! . '.r' .t t s r'.; F d , w. . .i: t
sy. Y I r-
1. •yyy r!!.„ ..I:yyr,R•1[ E I,'iIl��e�'{p� W•
':�� ` : it '.� !,.y'�' t. .�+ ..Ayes, _
w .. i q r+ 3i 1•. • 'f f '�` +)• �f .�- iy r Y./ a •:J_ -
•
'F •f�; :,$r :.� ., t' t r �, %� 1 °+r,Fy: . _ n. _ +�'�. ' : RESTORATION
+'' ,t. y'1(' :p.:` •awi§1'.. `'a; SYSTEMS I LLC
`` j- ' ..�,;+: .' r .I 44.
; t< _�
1,-• , r:. + } �s 1 /., . h r'' • ., i . , ` s'k x�' Project:
...ft _4,,- -- •,
• , 4 t • •
. , ' 1741 '.4',iiii, •
1. d ;�. � ':TI � I' :�.. i t ' .:.. ,R • �•. �• / r i �Y•• p- -c
0.
ttc,
- * • Lam` ,. ': ; J / ./� • ri r;, �y r i' .,. , ,.., Alamance County, NC
kiFii.?
. ..', .;• 'i ) ' �.� �: ri• Title:
4
• �,.=17 \
Notes:
''''.-------------\---mmnigkill76:-'—.1111111111ht
�- 1.Background Imagery Source:
_ me..µ \- 2014 aerial photography
�_._ �.x provided by the NC OneMap
�• I program (online, provided by
_ e graop�hi
Information
•�� the NC Geographic
' • y '' r , — . IP- l I CoordinationCouncil)
miiiii .--.. - -,--444.fli-- I ' - /
i _ Conservation Easement=7.01 ac ' 'i�' ;• :w —�� \\ • r
Restored Stream Channel=0.43 ac + r 4 \ ••, ' -.
iiiIP Drawn by: KRJ/CLF
_ Nutrient Offset Credit Area(101-200 ft)=0.22 ac(9769.53 sq ft) rir.,_ ,.
Riparian Buffer Restoration Area(TOB-100 ft)=4.52 ac(196,725.78 sq ft) 1 '. Date: MAR 2018
DWR Stream Flags - For purposes of calculating
Riparian Buffer Enhancement via Cattle Exclusion(TOB-100 ft)= 1.74 ac(75,686.90 sq ft) .4
t. � Riparian Buffer and Nutrient Offset credits, these Scale: 1:2000
Wetland Mitigation Credit Area=0.09 ac
•
,♦♦, flags represent stream termini. Project No.: 16-017
��� Constructed BMP Footprint(no credit)=0.02 ac
1 CVS Plots - - -- .
FIGURE
—••— 50 ft from TOB +
--• 100 ft from TOB
--• 200 ft from TOB 1 `
DWR Flags - . _ r. r.=•- _
. ' 3
. .
0 250 500 1,000 '
•
Feet -,,� 4-.. -
aDOGJ

^_
^_
FIGURE
Drawn by:
Date:
Scale:
Project No.:
KRJ/CLF
OCT 2017
1:2000
16-017
Title:
Project:
Prepared for:
Alamance County, NC
ORPHAN CREEKBANK PARCEL
POTENTIAL CONVERSION OF WETLAND CREDIT TO RIPARIAN BUFFER CREDIT
4
Notes:
0 500 1,000250Feet
Legend
Conservation Easement = 7.01 ac
Riparian Buffer Restoration (TOB-100 ft)
Riparian Buffer Restoration (101-200 ft)
Riparian Buffer Enhancement via Cattle Exclusion (TOB-100 ft)
^_DWR Flags
Restored Stream Channel = 0.43 ac
Constructed BMP Footprint (no credit) = 0.02 ac
50 ft from TOB
100 ft from TOB
200 ft from TOB
³
1. Background Imagery Source:
2014 aerial photography
provided by the NC OneMap
program (online, provided by
the NC Geographic Information
Coordination Council)
UT-1
UT-2
UT-3
UT-1A
UT-1B
DWR Stream Flags - For purposes of calculating
Riparian Buffer and Nutrient Offset credits, these
flags represent stream termini.
NOTE: Riparian areas that fail to qualifyto generate wetland mitigation credit may beviable for generating riparian buffer credit. Anyareas proposed for buffer mitigation credit mustmeet standards detailed in 15A NCAC 02B .0295.
UT-3
NOTE ABOUT BUFFER WIDTHS:TOB-20 ft = Buffer is less than 20 ft from the TOB and therefore qualifies for no credit.TOB-29 ft = Buffer width is contiguous from TOB, is a minimum of 20 ft from the TOBand a maximum of 29 ft from the TOB, and qualifies for 75% credit.TOB-100 ft = Buffer width is contiguous from TOB, is a minimum of 29 ft from the TOBand a maximum of 100 ft from the TOB, and qualifies for 100% credit.101-200’ = Buffer width is contiguous from TOB, is a minimum of 101 ft from the TOBand a maximum of 200 ft from the TOB, and qualifies for 33% credit.
14 Digit Watershed ID: 03030002050010
Potential Conversion of Wetland Credits to Riparian Buffer Mitigation Units
*BufferWidth Credit Type Total Area Mitigation Ratio Percentage of Full Credit Mitigation Units
TOB-100 ft Restoration 0.07 ac (2949.49 sq ft) 1:1 100% 0.07 ac (2949.49 sq ft)
101-200 ft Restoration 0.001 ac (51.49 sq ft) 1:1 33% 0.0003 ac (16.99 sq ft)
TOB-100 ft Enhancement via Cattle Exclusion (15A NCAC 02B .0295 (o)(6) 0.02 ac (962.29 sq ft) 2:1 100% 0.01 ac (481.15 sq ft) Total Potential Riparian Buffer Mitigation Units 0.08 ac (3447.63 sq ft)
Appendix C.
Vegetation Data
Table 5. Planted Woody Vegetation
Table 6.Total Planted Stems by Plot and Species
Vegetation Plot Photographs
Orphan Creek Bank Parcel Year 4(2021)Monitoring Report Appendices
Phase One Haw River WS Umbrella Bank Restoration Systems,LLC

Table 5. Planted Bare Root Woody Vegetation
Species Quantity
River birch (Betula nigra) 650
Button bush (Cephalanthus occidentalis) 250
Eastern redbud (Cercis canadensis) 350
Silky dogwood (Corpus amomum) 750
Green ash (Fraxinus pennsylvanica) 1550
Tulip poplar(Liriodendron tulipifera) 225
Syca more(Platanus occidentalis) 1500
Black gum (Nyssa sylvatica var.sylvatica) 250
Water oak(Quercus nigra) 700
Willow oak(Quercus phellos) 1000
Black willow(Salix nigra) 500
Elderberry(Sambucus canadensis) 300
TOTAL 8025
Orphan Creek Bank Parcel Year 4(2021)Monitoring Report Appendices
Phase One Haw River WS Umbrella Bank Restoration Systems,LLC

Table 6. Total Stems by Plot and Species
Project Code 1500704. Project Name:Orphan Creek
Current Plot Data(MY4 2021) Annual Means
1500704-01-0001 1500704-01-0002 1500704-01-0003 1500704-01-0004 1500704-01-0005 1500704-01-0006 1500704-01-0007 MY4(2021) MY3(2020) MY2(2019) MY1(2018) MVO(2018)
Scientific Name Common Name Species Type PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T
Acer rubrum red maple Tree 5 3 8
Betula nigra river birch Tree 2 2 2 1 1 1 3 3 3 4 4 4 4 4 4 7 7 7 10 10 10
Carpinus caroliniana American hornbeam Tree 7 7 7 13 13 13
Cephalanthus occidentalis common buttonbush Shrub 1 1 1 _ 2 2 2 3 3 3 2 2 2 3 3 3 3 3 3
Cercis canadensis eastern redbud Tree 3 3 4 5 5 5 8 8 9 8 8 8 8 8 8 5 5 5 3 3 3
Cornus amomum silky dogwood Shrub 1 1 1 7 7 7 4 4 4 12 12 12 2 2 2 26 26 26 27 27 27 28 28 28 29 29 29 28 28 28
Diospyros virginiana common persimmon Tree 1 2 3 4
Fraxinus pennsylvanica green ash Tree 7 7 10 5 5 7 3 3 6 2 2 3 2 2 3 1 1 2 20 20 31 19 19 35 18 18 19 22 22 36 27 27 27
Juniperus virginiana eastern redcedar Tree 2 2
Liquidambar styraciflua sweetgum Tree 3 7 7 2 2 1 22 24 1
Liriodendron tulipifera tuliptree Tree 4 2 2 2 2 2 6 2 2 6 2 2 9 3 3 5 5 5 5
Nyssa tupelo Tree 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2
Nyssa sylvatica blackgum Tree 3 1 1 1 7 7 7
Pinus taeda loblolly pine Tree 1 1 2
Pinus virginiana Virginia pine Tree 2
Platanus occidentalis American sycamore Tree 2 2 2 2 2 2 10 2 2 4 12 12 14 2 2 3 9 9 11 29 29 46 30 30 36 30 30 34 29 29 29 20 20 20
Platanus occidentalis var.o Sycamore,Plane-tree Tree 1 1 1
Quercus oak Tree 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 3 3 2 2 2 7 7 7 12 12 12
Quercus alba white oak Tree _ 1 1 1
Quercus nigra water oak Tree 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 1 1 5 5 5 6 6 6 6 6 6 5 5 5 6 6 6
Quercus pagoda cherrybark oak Tree 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 3 3 4 4 4 5 5 5 9 9 9 10 10 10
Quercus phellos willow oak Tree 2 2 2 4 4 4 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 3 3 1 1 1 12 12 12 13 13 13 12 12 12 16 16 16 15 15 15
Quercus shumardii Shumard's oak Tree 1 1 1 1 1 1
Rhus copallinum flameleaf sumac shrub 2 2
Robinia pseudoacacia black locust Tree 1 1
Salix caprea goat willow Exotic 1
Sambucus canadensis Common Elderberry Shrub 2 2 2 1 2 2 3 2 2 2 3 3 3 3 3 3 6 6 6
Ulmus elm Tree 1
Ulmus alata winged elm Tree 11 8
Ulmus americana American elm Tree 14 2 16
Unknown Shrub or Tree 2 2 2
Stem count 15 15 18 19 19 33 15 15 38 18 18 33 23 23 30 10 10 31 15 15 22 115 115 205 122 122 186 122 122 137 149 149 179 169 169 169
size(ares) 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 7 7 7 7
size(ACRES) 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.17
Species count 6 6 6 5 5 10 7 7 9 4 4 7 7 7 10 5 5 9 5 5 8 13 13 21 13 13 17 13 13 14 16 16 20 18 18 18
Stems per ACRE 607 607 728.4 768.9 768.9 1335 607 607 1538 728.4 728.4 1335 930.8 930.8 1214 404.7 404.7 1255 607 607 890.3 664.8 664.8 1185 705.3 705.3 1075 705.3 705.3 792 861.4 861.4 1035 977.03 977 977
Color for Density PnoLS=Planted excluding livestakes
Exceeds requirements by 10% P-all=Planting including livestakes
Exceeds requirements,but by less than 10% T=All planted and natural recruits including livestakm
Fails to meet requirements,by less than 10% T includes natural recruits
Fails to meet requirements by more than 10%

Table 7.Temporary Vegetation Transect Data
Species T-1(106°) T-2(144°) T-3 (303°) T-4(271°) T-5(81°)
Betula nigra 1 2
Carya spp. 1 1 2 1
Cercis canadensis 15 7
Cephalanthis occidentalis 1
Cornus ammomum 7 2 7 2
Diospyros virginiana 2 2 3
Fraxinus pennsylvanica 1 1 2 9
Liriodendron tulipifera 1 2
Nyssa sylvatica 1
Platanus occidentalis 3 6 3 5
Quercus nigra 1 1
Quercus phellos 1 5
Ulmus alata 1 1
Total Stems 16 13 22 26 23
Total Stems/Acre 648 526 891 1053 931
Orphan Creek Bank Parcel Year 4(2021)Monitoring Report Appendices
Phase One Haw River WS Umbrella Bank Restoration Systems,LLC

Orphan Creek
MY-04(2021)Vegetation Monitoring Photographs
Taken September 2021
Plot 1 T' .47r ''•.. Plot 2 ,
•
...ti •••''
-r: '.
`ya
• •rtr
Plot 3 • • w•-'� Plot 4 l'r `Sj w. .,.R f fib. r .
• r
�� .t. 7'�• ►v • . /,e • ..' .•,•j ::f•it • , •
.. , _•••._ . ii ,;..,... ... . . ..
•J .�
....-------....,..............4: .' • ,... .7.
Plot 5 Plot 6
k r r�• +K
a.
".'-' : 44, -- •IT -p ...-4.1*.t' •'' "Fr. . .
{
. <`•-„. . . • \ i.
4 Ng Wilt': •
Plot 7 z, _ '3� • �;
T
-- r. a
•
� .�
Orphan Creek Bank Parcel Year 4(2021)Monitoring Report Appendices
Phase One Haw River WS Umbrella Bank Restoration Systems,LLC

Appendix D.
Delivered Credit Yield Table for Jordan Sub Watersheds
Orphan Creek Bank Parcel Year 4(2021)Monitoring Report Appendices
Phase One Haw River WS Umbrella Bank Restoration Systems,LLC

Jordan Water Supply Nutrient Strategy Updated
Delivered Credit Yield Table for Jordan Sub Watersheds 12/20/2012
Attachment B
Delivered credit yields for buffer acres in Jordan small watersheds.
Watershed ID Jordan Delivery Factors TN Credit TP Credit
Subwatershed TN TP (Ibs/30yrs) (Ibs/30yrs)
03030002010010 Haw 25% 10% 562.34 14.38
03030002010020 Haw 37% 36% 832.26 51.77
03030002010030 Haw 44% 40% 989.72 57.52
03030002010040 Haw 49% 44% 1102.19 63.27
03030002010050 Haw 55% 48% 1237.15 69.03
03030002020010 Haw 15% 4% 337.40 5.75
03030002020020 Haw 22% 12% 494.86 17.26
03030002020030 Haw 48% 43% 1079.69 61.84
03030002020040 Haw 32% 33% 719.80 47.46
03030002020050 Haw 32% 32% 719.80 46.02
03030002020060 Haw 47% 42% 1057.20 60.40
03030002020070 Haw 54% 47% 1214.66 67.59
03030002030010 Haw 60% 56% 1349.62 80.53
03030002030020 Haw 44% 31% 989.72 44.58
03030002030030 Haw 25% 8% 562.34 11.50
03030002030040 Haw 42% 30% 944.73 43.14
03030002030050 Haw 64% 62% 1439.59 89.16
03030002030060 Haw 39% 19% 877.25 27.32
03030002030070 Haw 36% 18% 809.77 25.88
03030002030080 Haw 73% 64% 1642.04 92.04
03030002040010 Haw 30% 14% 674.81 20.13
03030002040020 Haw 28% 14% 629.82 20.13
03030002040030 Haw 71% 63% 1597.05 90.60
03030002040040 Haw 32% 15% 719.80 21.57
03030002040050 Haw 52% 50% 1169.67 71.90
03030002040060 Haw 54% 51% 1214.66 73.34
03030002040070 Haw 67% 60% 1507.07 86.28
03030002040080 Haw 53% 51% 1192.16 73.34
03030002040090 Haw 54% 51% 1214.66 73.34
03030002040100 Haw 75% 65% 1687.02 93.47
03030002040110 Haw 66% 60% 1484.58 86.28
03030002050010 Haw 74% 68% 1664.53 97.79
03030002050020 Haw 81% 74% 1821.98 106.42
03030002050030 Haw 42% 17% 944.73 24.45
03030002050040 Haw 80% 73% 1799.49 104.98
Page 1of2

Jordan Water Supply Nutrient Strategy Updated
Delivered Credit Yield Table for Jordan Sub Watersheds 12/20/2012
Watershed ID Jordan Delivery Factors TN Credit TP Credit
Subwatershed TN TP (Ibs/30yrs) (Ibs/30yrs)
03030002050050 Haw 71% 67% 1597.05 96.35
03030002050060 Haw 79% 73% 1777.00 104.98
03030002050070 Haw 78% 72% 1754.50 103.54
03030002050080 Haw 80% 73% 1799.49 104.98
03030002050090 Haw 79% 73% 1777.00 104.98
03030002050100 Haw 81% 75% 1821.98 107.85
03030002060010 Haw 81% 74% 1821.98 106.42
03030002060020 Haw 95% 97% 2136.90 139.49
03030002060030 Haw 88% 91% 1979.44 130.86
03030002060040 Haw 97% 98% 2181.88 140.93
03030002060050 Haw 92% 95% 2069.41 136.61
03030002060062 Haw 98% 99% 2204.38 142.37
03030002060070 UNH 40% 19% 867.70 27.32
03030002060080 UNH 59% 45% 1279.86 64.71
03030002060100 UNH 69% 63% 1496.79 90.60
03030002060110 UNH 61% 58% 1323.25 83.41
03030002060120 UNH 69% 63% 1496.79 90.60
03030002060140 UNH 85% 89% 1843.87 127.99
03030002060130 UNH 69% 63% 1496.79 90.60
03030002060160 LNH 85% 90% 1932.07 131.76
03030002060090* UNH 92% 94% 1995.71 135.18
03030002060090* LNH 92% 94% 2091.18 137.62
03030002060060* UNH 94% 96% 2039.10 138.05
03030002060060* LNH 94% 96% 2136.64 140.54
03030002060150* UNH 88% 91% 1908.94 130.86
03030002060150* LNH 88% 91% 2000.26 133.22
*Watershed is located in both the Upper New Hope(UNH)and Lower New Hope (LNH)Subwatersheds.
Page 2 of 2

Appendix E.
Year 4(2021) Planted Stem Height Data
Orphan Creek Bank Parcel Year 4(2021)Monitoring Report Appendices
Phase One Haw River WS Umbrella Bank Restoration Systems,LLC

Plot Scientific Name X Y Height (cm) DBH (cm) Vigor
1 Quercus nigra 3.9 0.8 92 4
1 Fraxinus pennsylvanica 5.0 2.5 235 1.5 4
1 Fraxinus pennsylvanica 6.0 2.7 335 2 4
1 Cornus amomum 6.3 4.0 175 _ 0.8 _ 4
1 Fraxinus pennsylvanica 8.0 2.5 385 2.1 4
1 Quercus nigra 7.7 0.5 135 _ 4 _
1 Quercus sp. 8.4 4.2 80 4
1 Fraxinus pennsylvanica 9.1 5.5 210 1.2 4
1 Fraxinus pennsylvanica 9.4 7.3 245 1 4
1 Platanus occidentalis 6.2 7.4 205 0.5 4
1 Fraxinus pennsylvanica 5.8 10.0 285 1.1 4
1 Fraxinus pennsylvanica 6.7 8.1 82 _ _ 3
1 Platanus occidentalis 8.2 7.0 385 3 4
1 Quercus phellos 7.0 9.9 105 _ 1
1 Quercus phellos 0.7 5.2 0 0
1 Quercus phellos 2.4 9.9 _ 60 _ 3
2 Cornus amomum 0.1 2.1 100 4
2 Cornus amomum 2.2 2.7 61 3
2 Fraxinus pennsylvanica 4.9 1.8 130 4
2 Quercus phellos 2.3 4.3 70 4
2 Fraxinus pennsylvanica 5.3 4.2 52 4
2 Cornus amomum 7.0 3.5 172 0.8 4
2 Cornus amomum 6.7 1.0 90 3
2 Sambucus canadensis 8.7 3.8 _ 155 _ 0.2 _ 4
2 Cornus amomum 6.9 5.5 105 4
2 Cornus amomum 6.2 7.8 0 _ 0
2 Sambucus canadensis 8.7 6.3 310 2.2 4
2 Fraxinus pennsylvanica 8.4 8.3 255 1 4
2 Cornus amomum 5.8 9.7 105 4
2 Fraxinus pennsylvanica 5.1 6.3 195 1.1 4
2 Cornus amomum 4.9 8.7 109 4
2 Cephalanthus occidentalis 4.0 6.8 85 3
2 Quercus phellos 2.7 6.1 0 0
2 Fraxinus pennsylvanica 2.2 9.0 80 3
2 Quercus phellos 1.7 7.3 50 3
2 Quercus phellos 0.2 7.8 91 4
2 Quercus phellos 1.9 0.3 91 4
3 Cornus amomum 2.5 4.6 265 3.1 4
3 Quercus pagoda 4.8 2.9 0 Missing
3 Platanus occidentalis 2.8 0.6 500 8 4
3 Quercus nigra 5.3 0.5 285 1.8 4
3 Quercus nigra 6.5 2.8 115 4
3 Platanus occidentalis 7.3 0.3 585 7.2 4
3 Quercus pagoda 9.7 0.4 122 4 _
3 Cornus amomum 9.8 4.8 0 0
3 Cornus amomum 6.9 5.0 135 4

Plot Scientific Name X Y Height (cm) DBH (cm) Vigor
3 Betula nigra 9.4 7.2 161 1.5 4
3 Fraxinus pennsylvanica 9.6 9.5 205 1.5 4
3 Cornus amomum 5.0 5.0 255 2.1 4
3 Fraxinus pennsylvanica 3.1 9.2 315 _ 2.5 _ 4
3 Quercus phellos 0.7 6.9 151 0.3 4
3 Fraxinus pennsylvanica 1.0 9.0 285 2.5 4
3 Cornus amomum 0.2 4.8 276 2.1 4
3 Betula nigra 7.7 9.4 165 1.1 4
4 Cercis canadensis 1.3 1.1 290 2 4
4 Cornus amomum 0.5 2.7 325 2 4
4 Cornus amomum 2.7 3.2 345 2.1 4
4 Cornus amomum 4.5 3.3 300 _ 1.9 _ 4
4 Cercis canadensis 4.3 1.1 168 0.2 4
4 Cercis canadensis 9.4 1.5 _ 231 1.5 4
4 Cornus amomum 6.8 3.4 272 2.3 4
4 Cornus amomum 9.1 4.0 _ 60 3
4 Cornus amomum 5.4 5.5 350 2.3 4
4 Platanus occidentalis 6.8 5.8 365 _ 2.5 _ 4
4 Cornus amomum 8.3 8.9 150 0.7 4
4 Cornus amomum 9.8 7.3 190 0.5 4
4 Betula nigra 5.5 8.9 0 Missing
4 Platanus occidentalis 5.6 6.8 240 1.5 3
4 Betula nigra 3.2 9.4 175 0.8 4
4 Cornus amomum 3.3 9.7 _ 228 0.8 4
4 Quercus nigra 1.2 9.7 0 0
4 Cornus amomum 0.8 7.1 _ 220 0.6 4
4 Cornus amomum 3.5 7.0 215 0.3 4
4 Cornus amomum 6.7 9.4 140 0.9 4
5 Platanus occidentalis 2.5 0.2 75 3
5 Platanus occidentalis 2.1 3.5 115 3
5 Platanus occidentalis 0.2 2.8 60 4
5 Platanus occidentalis 3.0 3.1 180 1.5 4
5 Nyssa sp. 4.4 2.1 90 4
5 Quercus pagoda 6.7 3.3 125 3
5 Cercis canadensis 6.3 0.8 164 0.8 4
5 Cercis canadensis 8.8 0.6 80 4
5 Cercis canadensis 9.2 3.0 72 4
5 Quercus nigra 6.6 6.0 120 4
5 Cercis canadensis 9.4 8.3 55 3
5 Quercus phellos 5.7 8.3 170 0.8 4
5 Fraxinus pennsylvanica 5.7 6.0 220 1.5 4
5 Platanus occidentalis 2.6 6.0 72 3
5 Platanus occidentalis 3.9 7.3 170 0.8 4
5 Platanus occidentalis 2.7 8.0 61 3
5 Platanus occidentalis 3.6 9.0 200 1.5 4
5 Platanus occidentalis 2.6 10.0 120 4

Plot Scientific Name X Y Height (cm) DBH (cm) Vigor
5 Platanus occidentalis 0.7 9.5 55 3
5 Platanus occidentalis 0.4 7.3 55 3
5 Fraxinus pennsylvanica 1.3 9.0 40 3
5 Platanus occidentalis 0.6 5.4 82 3
5 Cercis canadensis 9.1 5.9 60 3
5 Nyssa sp. 6.9 7.5 0 _ Missing
6 Cephalanthus occidentalis 1.0 1.8 160 0.5 4
6 Cephalanthus occidentalis 2.9 1.2 240 2 4
6 Fraxinus pennsylvanica 4.6 0.1 300 3.2 4
6 Fraxinus pennsylvanica 1.7 0.3 343 3 4
6 Platanus occidentalis 7.6 0.3 325 2.5 4
6 Quercus phellos 9.1 3.2 230 _ 1 _ 4
6 Quercus sp. 9.0 6.0 0 Missing
6 Quercus pagoda 8.2 8.9 171 _ 0.8 _ 4
6 Platanus occidentalis 4.8 8.4 48 4
6 Quercus phellos 3.0 5.8 50 4
6 Quercus phellos 7.4 5.8 110 4
7 Platanus occidentalis 1.0 2.2 325 2.5 _ 4
7 Platanus occidentalis 2.1 2.5 120 4
7 Fraxinus pennsylvanica 2.5 4.0 200 0.5 4
7 Platanus occidentalis 4.5 4.2 270 2.1 4
7 Platanus occidentalis 3.1 2.9 330 2.8 4
7 Platanus occidentalis 4.7 2.3 285 2.1 4
7 Cornus amomum 6.2 3.0 _ 90 _ _ 4
7 Cornus amomum 9.9 2.8 216 0.4 4
7 Platanus occidentalis 6.8 5.0 215 1 4
7 Liriodendron tulipifera 6.1 7.0 105 4
7 Platanus occidentalis 8.5 7.1 240 1.4 4
7 Platanus occidentalis 9.3 9.8 152 0.8 4
7 Liriodendron tulipifera 3.7 6.1 100 4
7 Quercus phellos 0.7 9.0 79 4
7 Platanus occidentalis 5.0 3.6 275 1.5 4