20211665 Ver 1_Sullivan Farm PCN_20211112

WEPG
Preliminary ORM Data Entry Fields for New Actions Wetlands and Environmental Planning Group
Leonard S. Rindner, PLLC.
SAW — 2020 - 01813 BEGIN DATE [Received Date]:
Prepare file folder ❑
1. Project Name [PCN Form A2a]: Sullivan Farm
2. Work Type: Private Fv_1 Institutional ❑
3. Project Description / Purpose [PCN Form 133d and 133e]:
NWP 14 request for residential development
Assign Action ID Number in ORM ❑
Government ❑ Commercial ❑
4. Property Owner / Applicant [PCN Form A3 or A4]:
Lennar (Applicant)
5. Agent / Consultant [PCN Form A5 —or ORM Consultant ID Number]: WEPG, PLLC c/o Heath Caldwell
6. Related Action ID Number(s) [PCN Form 135b]:
7. Project Location - Coordinates, Street Address, and/or Location Description [PCN Form 131b]:
35.8275,-80.8674
North of Glenway Drive
8. Project Location -Tax Parcel ID [PCN Form 131a]: 4746507758
9. Project Location —County [PCN Form A2b]: Iredell
10. Project Location — Nearest Municipality or Town [PCN Form A2c]: Statesville
11. Project Information — Nearest Waterbody [PCN Form 132a]: Fourth Creek
12. watershed / 8-Digit Hydrologic Unit Code [PCN Form 132c]:South Yadkin/ 03040102
Authorization: Section 10 ❑ Section 404
Regulatory Action Type:
❑ Standard Permit
U Nationwide Permit # 14
❑ Regional General Permit #
Jurisdictional Determination Request
�✓ Section 10 & 404 ❑
❑Pre -Application Request
Unauthorized Activity
❑ Compliance
❑ No Permit Required
OaIMeWks] 11[4111 %

Wetlands and Environmental Planning Group
Leonard S. Rindner, PLLC.
November 12, 2021
Ms. Krysta Stygar
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Charlotte Regulatory Field Office
8430 University Executive Park Drive
Charlotte, NC 28262
Mr. Alan Johnson
NCDEQ
Division of Water Resources
610 East Center Street, Suite 301
Mooresville, NC 28115
Mr. Paul Wcjoski
NCDEQ
Division of Water Resources
Wetlands & Storm Water Branch
512 North Salisbury Street
Raleigh, NC 27604
Mr. Byron Hamstead
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
Asheville Field Office
160 Zillicoa St.
Asheville, NC 28801
Subiect: SAW-2020-01813; Pre -Construction Notification for NWP 414 for the Sullivan
Farm site in Statesville, Iredell County, North Carolina
Ms. Stygar, Messrs. Johnson, Wcjoski, and Hamstead,
Enclosed is a request for Nationwide Permit 914 for the Sullivan Farm site on 90 acres west of
James Farm Road, north of the intersection with Glenway Drive in Statesville, NC. The site is a
proposed residential development and consists of seven streams and five wetlands. A
Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Request was authorized in November 2020. Please
refer to the Jurisdictional Determination Information sections for information on onsite surface
waters.
As shown on the attached exhibits, the proposed project will include permanent impacts to two
streams and one wetland for road crossing access. Overall impacts to site surface waters
associated with the proposed development were limited through site selection location, design,
Charlotte Office:
10612-D Providence Rd.
PMB 550
Charlotte, NC 28277
[phone]
len. ri [e-mail]
www.wetiands-epg.com
Asheville Office:
1070 Tunnel Rd., Bldg. I
Suite 10, PM 283
Asheville, NC 28805

Wetlands and Environmental Planning Group
Leonard S. Rindner, PLLC.
and the location/orientation of the proposed lots and access routes. Headwalls are proposed and
3:1 slopes will be implemented to limit impacts to site surface waters. Total permanent impacts
proposed include 269 linear feet of stream impact (Streams B and C) and 0.007 acres of wetland
impacts (Wetland D). This access crossing was necessary due to City of Statesville connectivity
requirements. The City requires connection of the proposed development to the existing
subdivision to the north. This alignment was based on the location of the Coddington Lane stub
to the north and is designed per NCDOT design requirements. The use of a retaining wall to
avoid further impacts to Wetland D is prohibited per NCDOT right-of-way requirements. The
applicant has demonstrated substantial avoidance and minimization efforts in which 86% of the
0.026 acres of onsite wetlands and 73% of the 1,946 linear feet onsite streams will be avoided.
To compensate for the anticipated permanent impacts to onsite wetlands, the applicant is
proposing payment to the North Carolina Division of Mitigation Services In -Lieu Fee Program at
a 1.5:1 ratio due to the reduced quality of the features, including altered geomorphology and
water quality. Please refer to the NCSAM section for additional information.
Historic and Archeological Resources were also evaluated for this site. The State Historic
Preservation Office has reviewed the information and concluded that there would be no effect to
historic resources. Please refer to the Cultural Resources Report section for additional details.
Also enclosed is a copy of our Threatened/Endangered Species Evaluation for the site. No listed
species were identified within the project area and we believe that there will be no effect on
listed species, or their critical habitat as designated under Section 7 of the Endangered Species
Act. Please refer to the Threatened and Endangered Species Evaluation Section for additional
details on the terrestrial species evaluation. This report has been submitted to Fish & Wildlife
Service for concurrence. Thank you for your consideration and please contact me if you have any
questions, [phone] or email at heath. caldwell(cr�,wetlands-epg.com.
Sincerely,
V�Cav
Heath Caldwell Len Rindner, PWS
Environmental Scientist Principal
Charlotte Office: www.wetlands-epg.com Asheville Office:
10612-D Providence Rd. 1070 Tunnel Rd., Bldg. I
PMB 550 Suite 10, PM 283
Charlotte, NC 28277 Asheville, NC 28805
[phone] 2
[e-mail]

C
O
V
d
d
Q
L.
N
CL
Permit Application

c
0
.y
E
a
3
a�
z
o
E
0 w c
LL O
Z a w
V W
d
a
0 W to r
C� y
0 C N
Z W C
•ay. 'O d
C C
0 d w
�+ a d
O O
V v
U) O
= W 3
0 z
V 0 O
LL .d.
V
IL
d
a
X
Q
W
d
a
M
ao
N
0
N
0
li
m
E
12
C
.N
N
V
0
IL
II
z
d
a
N
O
z
z
d
YJ
L
8
m
a
O
z
O
}
M
N
Q a
d _
r
�LD
d d
U
T
is d LO
m d
a 3 3o �
m LO
aL+ W
d d
w
L N d
a
7 N N
m 3 c
Q
Q € .
CL EL a
p V O
CL
0 0
d -
an n
A o ❑

_v
N
c
0
.y
Nl
E
a
N
Z
it
c
O
N
O
3
Y
d
d
N
t
N
3
•o (L
a �
Z a
Q
o @
d
a � a
CL o0
o
3 z N m
Z w N
000
w
Q
O
V
d
aL..
P
9
d
w
d
a
a
E
c
Q
0
0
3
z O
d Z
p
m N
}
O
c
O
r
O
CL
C
m
d
C
J
a
E
z'
z
IL
d
M
.;
0
z
N
zz d
RL
a
E
z
Q
z
z
■ ■'
a �
d
m E
C
N LD
r a
O co
M
E y
N 7
Y o-
d
o f0
3 c
c d
O c
OO
CL a
a ..
m U
� d
G d
d .L.
M N
o �
ID LD
CT
a
f0 0
ID -0
a
c
r
3
d @
3
m
E E
0
LL N
N O
d Z5
7 O
d a
� N
W N
C •0
CD CDa)m
i y
Cco
d
LL Q
EL`
d �
Y
N
c
O
a �
N cf)
CD
m LL
U
T CD
L L_
rq 3
c m
d
CD
c
m P
�8
CL
E m
,Q c
H aa)
L N
rn C V
E
E LL
N
�m
m w
d
0
E
N
d
O
a
a
ai
O
c
O
E
7
it
Cl.
O
O
u
w
�
o
c
o
a
z
u
`o
C
7
coy
Z
d r
rn N
m
5 ti
r
}
w
w
0

v
X
m
Y
co
N
N
-p u
m;
O c
O
w
V
a' a
G.
0 V
W W
c0 c0
'O 'O
Lo Lo
LL LL
0
z
c d
o c
v O
Off, c
10 a
E c
O
Q cc
E
d Co
m c
R C
co T
cc
aL OJ O'
O
X
z0
d
M
�
L
O
a
a
°
O
§
a
ma
L
W
�
J
d
�
n
m
E
v
adi
t
m
cc
0
a
LL
°
E m
J
�
LL
w
c?
w
p
c
> IL
N
CL
£
7
cn
°
"
J
O
a
Sri
d
Q'
C
K
N
C
d
H
;;
0
t
d
?
coz
E
E
c
7
cq
Z
r
U
i+
W
V
d
cc
7 X
r
ca
Z
c
O1
N M
o
c
m
m
c
c
c
0 O
M
d
L c
U
Q
o
z
z
a
d
d
O
3 Q
E
}
aL
W
}
Y O)
O
O
J a
MQ
W
Z
O
V
3
at Co
U
t�
3 Co

v
d
*
d
o
c
o
t
IL
R
p
�
N
t
O
o
V
0
U
c
E
•c
o
�
�
pCO
a
U
y Z U
*
o•
d
o
U
a
a
N
*
y
w
0
E
c
N
d
:°
C
:a
£
P
c
cc
W
v
OI
c
L
p
Q
di
a
m
N
T
rn
w
Cp
p
N
0
3p
a
_
�
C
c
y
m
OL
m
to
N
V
N
C
n
0
L
O
0)
Y
G
d
*w
C
O
v
C
Z`
V
w
5
!
d
O
a
7i
w
t
p5 p
CD
E
L
C �e
aL,+
0
E
C
d
c
•O
cC�
G
0
�
N
CL
ii
CD
a`
3
i
�'
>
O
z
0
o
ci
a
o
2
Y
~
L
U
coC
N
cci
❑
�di
O
N
N
N
N
N
Q
C
a
N
a
E
3
Z
LL
N

_
§
f �
■ &
f z §
U # % U.
I f
co2 U n
U
k
CL
§
ƒ
�
2
E
k
E
_
E
c
E
■
3
0E
S
k
E
2
k
cc
§
f
,§
E
b
\
A
2
I
§
k
c
cc
k
§
k
A
k
Co
0
k
\
\ §
§
\
_
\ k
�
cc
\
/
k
f\/
//
k
j
k\
c!
k
\
n

�o
c
0
.y
Nl
E
N
Z
fd
of
U
C
N
.O
L
it a
O
d N ❑ N to
N c =n
$ �
Q N OO v m
a as— a d
0
of
d �¢5
z X
U � U.
coZ L) a
a)
0
N
L
N
co
N
it
0
U
m
a
N
y
c
cd
N
it
" 3
d �
Q U
E
W
a t
1
i`
i
m
a
E
z'
0
d co
to
0
G. to
a
N4

v
N
m
3
c
0
U
_O
d
L_
3
0
L
c
O
a
d
N
m
a
ai ai
�a U
M
Q a
Q N
a E
m U
fA CD
d a
d d
U y
m `
O. d
fa N
E N
U •�
d .-
d f0
O
N
LO
@ O
N
d
m
d c
P
o
!n O
d O
a
0 U
a)O
E
E
� o
m
Z
o
CDCD
N
U
M M
m m
c E
N
7 U
d -p
m C
7 c
T
N W
N U
d LD
c a
7 -
m
N- O
O) m
U
f0 O
d
c :2
2
CO
F a
a N
a
d
N
7 L_
3
aa)
LDm
aa) o
D LO.
0
Ea�
d
U O
O
do E
d
E
C N
m oE
c
a a
Oo
NN
N
:Z
Lo
c
U CD
d
O
v
CDLL
Q
o
i7 y
U
U
m
d a
N
pp
U c
$
ad+
N
Q �
9
m ai
v
Z.
w
A?N
6 Q
U
a
N
d •O
to
ai N
r
co
CO
J CO
M
it
d
O
a
9
d
O
Q
E
Q
d
v
O
a
Lp
d
c Y
o U
E �
to
Z
0
d LL
M
it
d
i
ad
O Q
d a)
`
d
d O
�e
> $
Q
N
d
M
Q Y
Q J
c
O V
p
c1r)
O
74
V

a
aD
x_
o E
H m
U0
Z Co
N
N
a3 c
_m m
o
C V N
3 .L U
m
rn.E
a�
0
rn��
� (D O
L .y
r
•L
0 0 0
a)
N 0 m
m 0 .0
L 3
Co
rn
O
0 C
12 c
E 2 w
m c m
LL 0 0
E (D
N :3
o E
3 3 �
m Q o
L
c 5 C
Co
N N N
ma
-0 ,0 O
(D O y
N 0
N t
a? QN Co
N cm �
L C. C
0 'Q
` �
o d
Y E
d
m
E
c _
7 �
d
d
_
m
�c
d
O $
Z
aL+
to
d
d
n
a
m
b
O
rn
d
.Q

v
as
c
O
.y
Nl
E
7
3
a�
z
Z
E
0
0
c
r
c
7
0
z
N
E
E
0
V
r0
cM
rn �
rn co
rn
d C)
a � O
E
3 O
N
O N
a d
w a
O- m Q
V w (n
c
0
a�
Z
Z
0
w
E
m
Z
0
d
w
T
m
Q
E
O
0
c
r
U)
c
0
v
0
Q
m
O
0
N
co
c
0
w
U
Q
CO
D
c
�0
C/) aai
0
Y c
�0
co
N
o
N C
c
N
3 �
L
N
H ❑
U)
c
m
IL
v
d
�O
IL
d
7
LL
0

ao
0
c
0
.y
E
a
3
a�
z
O
z
O
4.0
C
C
N
V
m
a
E
d
O
a
0
IL
r-
q
m
E
7
U)
Q.
Lb
m
m
Q.
E
10
C
N
u
d
E O R
*d O o
Ch i p
N d
it
O
9
tl!
O
d
Q N
H EL
N " V
Lo
it >
9
W
LL N
d }
N
d
C
C (d
3 a�
N
t`a
a
ll
O
oc *
3 cc
c
a m
E
H �
ci °
N m
a
m
E
N a
0
N
it
N
m m
E E
c
c
3
3
a
Z`
c
E
c
O
c
Q.
E
�
m
d
ILcm
3
N �
N �
N �

c
0
.y
Nl
E
7
3
a�
z
M
ra
C
C
d
Q
L
m
t
CL
d
d
d
d
- rn
P-
N
M m
N
t
m
m
v
ui
d
d
it
O O
CL
CD
CD
F
M '
EL
U
EL
U
490
.
91
E
_
c
L
c
N
�
d
M V.
a
c
UmCO
LLT
it
R
Q
E
0
HT
M
LL
LL
CL
N
N
CL
co
co
E
M
d
d
it
E
m
m
_
y
y
w
o
0
o
U
U
d
co
co
M
E
0
R
E
E
CL
E
E
t
L
d
M
c
r
c
d
R
R
cc
E
E
CL
E
co
AL
::
0
Q
H �
H
H
CD
M N
M O
M N
UU
Qa
ao
00
O O
c 5 U
E aco s
o .E .E
V , N
M cn cn
C
_C
m
G
C
m
C
_C
m
W
7
7
a.+
V
a
E
W

_
&
k
«
k
B
z
2
�
a o
of 0 \ R
\/»} kk
/\f3 E
' wo , N
/G72
0 ��m
,k/E+ EE
/
\\
k\(// § �k
77&w \C)
\»)/ _@
-0 /% f 2 /
.2 -0 � a 7
§)&)# E�
0_E @�
£(D
E7§ CLo=
§_/]U a/7
2}®!y ° CL
cL -r c Cl) 2
g/\\\ (D(k
£ { 'onf + 2 \ a
SEE%S - 0
��cu � C
CL k:
a\a\; E ■■w
�E»o~ 0 £(§
/\\\ 0.§
a-0 c 0 CL
�D E ■ -S
� 0- 0 w a - E
\§�2 k\§R
;22aoCc§�_
§»§- oafs°°
:-aE
0$§\{$a = tQ
\� D2
•\%2w%.00 c�k
)k] (M ) \ ®
�_°C)co 7 %
'777$`� @»
CL .\G§�(g«
cco
-
]ƒ\/{\/0o
k
U)
k
%
■
�
�
0
0
ƒ
s
&
A
O
k
0
§
2
k
r
EL
§
@
0
N-
IL
■
■
U.
�
�
�
�
�
■
E
�
IL
■
0
£
�
■
�
�
�
�
§
0
U
V
Lo
0
RM
E
E _
s 2
CN

v
c
0
.y
Nl
E
7
N
Z
d Q
d c
c O
i m
c m
o
E
rn v
c
r
R
� d
_R R
Q. d
R V
a a
d
c
d
O
�
c
O
d
O�
W
-
o
E
Q
Lo
C
d
o
d
m
Cc 42
E
c
Q
y
E
c E
m
z U V
L
cr
L
v
C
a
3
O
M
N
t
13
as
0
0
m
c
Cm
C
L
3
E
L
O
a.+
0
z
}
it
{t
N
N
e
C'
_d
CD
LO
N
OCD
-
CD
=
0
v�
o
=
V
z
Z
Q
U
V
C
C
z
d
C
Nco
�p
Q
—
N C�
L m
W
O
C
O c7
IL
0
c
o
d
aai o
o
R
N
9
v O
O
c
d_
N
N
H
O
CL
CC
o a
C
�•
V
Z
c
N
N o
L
d
O f0
Q
c
z N
_�
EL
.Q
� �
d
E
L 0
E
?
V 7
}2
U C
cmV
d
d
ma=i
E
C
d
E d
N
cc
_
t Cc
L
O
pE
N
d
c
3
CL
E E
z
w
z
o E
L
M
«
O
dCD
O
�
0
= N
N
O
N
O
9 lZ

d
i
C4
N
G.
7
0
3 d
z 0
00
E
d
o a) a
A L !n
EL D
O
J
W
N
CO
O
U
r•+
.0
c
N
N
W`
O
c
m
c
fd
a
L
m
3
E
L
O
w
a)
L
y
C
N
a
a
N
U
rt�+
L
c M
O •c
c a)
0 U
= •L
w a)
W y=
ui y
rt+ a)
U N
E
� O
N C
c �
W W
.3 •3
•y �
c y
N
O
�i CO
Co a�
0
c
� E�
L
O V
V � O
c
O
m
E
12
C
a+
AcA,
AW
W
a
a
3
N
Aj
L
r
0
z
c
Lo
.tr
N
c
_m
O
R
3 N
3 a
o z
o z
c
O
•� d
O �
d
m
d c
aL+ �
_Q
N W
0
z

viis
c
0
.y
Nl
E
7
3
a�
z
M
O
z
CD
}
V
o•
d
.Q
Q
w
r
0
a
Lo
ir
d
o
Q z
N 0
v
0 z
d0
N N
aO
Q •
0
'O
'O O'
c to
�Y
N
o�
L 41
E�
c R
E
m z
LO a
t 0
0
m w
v =
c c
{0
a a
O
z
O
z
L
Le!
c
3
0
c
c
7
0
z
it
ODD
N
.9
0
c
3
v
u
0
d
'o
a
O
O z
No
r
N
Ln O
o•
i
0
E
Lo
O
c
c
E
d
rn
v
a
i
i
u
m
.Q
Q
Z Z
w
0 d o
} O ca
O Ln 0

_
§
�
ƒ
■
�
ƒ
■
■
2k
kk
2/
$2
kk
��
\
c
£
% �
k
S @
-
-
k52
\
US
LU
7�
cam°
§/k
ƒ
E
/0
NCO
§
E2ƒ
■
�
'
(D
i
5
a
®
§�E
,
�)
@ 0.0
■
s
0
1
f
.02/0
CL
yc
0cm
f(D
V
s
©
®
�/
(DZ0
f
EDCo
§
°'
c400
°
\
CL
2
=
-0 k
§k
■0_
7m/
§
E
§7
@ E 0
C
CL
D
�0
a
�Mad
B
CD2
«f
�
�O
8Z
1�-
§
/
ƒ
O
�
■
§
�
5
a
�
■
CL
0
�
c
0
�
c
�
■
�
■
c
N
0
0
M
co
CL
cc
�
U.
§
�

v
49
Cl.
a
0
O
R
0
0
v
oLU
•d
9
LU
U.
LL
d
c
U
O
d
.Q
G.
N
aL..
3
d
0
z
d
O
a
N
cq
N
E
tU
N
E
U
y
U
N
c
cc
08
m N
E L
33 ai
3 a
L
2
N
L
U
:d
co
y
CD
m
co
U
fd
d
Z
U
CL
ram+
a)
E g
E
V Q
it
O
U
Q
N
c
_O
15
N
c
LU H
U
'C
O
d
W 0
E z
�a
.E d
7 7
d d
L C
Ol
Lo
N c
D
co
� d
N N
Cd
T
d d
C7 3
z E
d d
i N
d
O C
d
U �n
Q
d
CO �
d c
C1 U
d
L 'O
0 c
d
c
j d
T m
a CD
CD
d
Eye
U CD z
c Y a
o N d
� tLD
r
d
a @ a
c �
c N
O
NU
C
c Q m
N y
N C T
..L-. d f0
c _U
U d C
o
c Y
8 r d
c d
o d o
d E O
rnCD
, aci
d j C
3
iL co
d U
z Co
L _
LL
LO
Lf)
CO
CO

C
O
L
.y
Mn
y
x
E
N
N
E
co
O
�\
�
V
7
a
*
a
3
N
c
m
d
L
m
m
fA
O
0

WEPG
Wetlands and Environmental Planning Group Leonard S. Rindner, PLLC.
Agent Authorization Letter
The purpose of this form is to authorize our firm to act on your behalf in matters related to aquatic
resource (i.e. stream/wetlands) identification/mapping and regulatory permitting. The
undersigned, who are either registered property owners or legally authorized to conduct due
diligence activities on the property as identified below, do hereby authorize associates of
Leonard S. Rindner, PLLC, Wetlands and Environmental Planning Group (WEPG) to act on my
behalf and take all actions necessary for the processing, issuance, and acceptance of applicable
permit(s) and/or certification(s).
Proj ect/Site Name: Turnersburg Highway
Property Address: NW of Glenway Dr and James Farm Rd
Parcel Identification Number (PIN): 4746507758
Select one: I am other
Name: Matt Pannell
Company: Lennar
Mailing Address: 6701 Carmel Road, Ste. 425 Charlotte, NC 28226
Telephone Number: 704.380.7062
Electronic Mail Address: [e-mail]
—DocuSigned by:
haff Pa"& 10/9/2020
Property Owner / Interested Buyer* / Other" Date
* The Interested Buyer/Other acknowledges that an agreement and/or formal contract to purchase and/or conduct
due diligence activities exists between the current property owner and the signatory of this authorization in cases
where the property is not owned by the signatory.
Charlotte Office: www.wetlands-epg.com Asheville Office:
10612-D Providence Rd. 1070 Tunnel Rd., Bldg.
PMB 550 Suite 10, PM 283
Charlotte, NC 28277 Asheville, NC 28805
[phone]
len. [e-mail]

ROY COOPER
Governor
ELIZABETH S. BISER
Secretary
NORTH CAROLINA
Environmental Quality
November 5, 2021
Matt Pannell
Lennar Carolinas, LLC
6701 Carmel Road, Suite 425
Charlotte, NC 28226
Project: Sullivan Farm
Expiration of Acceptance: 5/5/2022
County: Iredell
The purpose of this letter is to notify you that the NCDEQ Division of Mitigation Services (DMS) is willing to
accept payment for compensatory mitigation for impacts associated with the above referenced project as
indicated in the table below. Please note that this decision does not assure that participation in the ❑MS in -
lieu fee mitigation program will be approved by the permit issuing agencies as mitigation for project impacts.
It is the responsibility of the applicant to contact permitting agencies to determine if payment to the DMS will
be approved. You must also comply with all other state, federal or local government permits, regulations or
authorizations associated with the proposed activity including G.S. § 143-214.11.
This acceptance is valid for six months from the date of this letter and is not transferable. If we have not
received a copy of the issued 404 Permit1401 Certification within this time frame, this acceptance will
expire. It is the applicant's responsibility to send copies of the permits to DMS. Once DMS receives a copy
of the permit(s) an invoice will be issued based on the required mitigation in that permit and payment must
be made prior to conducting the authorized work. The amount of the in -lieu fee to be paid by an applicant is
calculated based upon the Fee Schedule and policies listed on the DMS website.
Based on the information supplied by you in your request to use the DMS, the impacts for which you are
requesting compensatory mitigation credit are summarized in the following table. The amount of mitigation
required and assigned to DMS for this impact is determined by permitting agencies and may exceed the
impact amounts shown below.
River Basin
Impact Location
8-di it HL1C
Impact Type
Impact Quantity
Yadkin
03040102
Warm Stream
269
Upon receipt of payment, DMS will take responsibility for providing the compensatory mitigation. The
mitigation will be performed in accordance with the In -Lieu Fee Program instrument dated July 28, 2010.
Thank you for your interest in the DMS in -lieu fee mitigation program. If you have any questions or need
additional information, please contact [e-mail].
Sincerely,
FOR James. B Stanfill
Asset Management Supervisor
cc: Heath Caldwell, agent
D Q§ North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality I Division of Mitigation Services
217 West Jones Street 1 1652 Mail Service Center I Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1652
o mM�wa919.707,8976

N
_05
N
Q
05
10
Maps/Plans

�§
o
0§
##
�
}
�
}
/\
; ®2
0
k
%
®�9a,
F-1
§
\
�
/
\
/
\
�
LL
� kk
fk
,}
\ g
cn
/!E
� a
E
\/
\
.
(
J
CIN
2
tr
} �§
\
2 %LU
Ln
\
§
00
o
/
/
..
CIO
}
J
(
�
6
�
c
Ewa
/
}
/
0
2
/
§
%
LL
k
`z
0
>
uk
J
?
2
/
&
CL
g
E
$
m
E
/
:
%
q _
\
Jd
ivR
c
U_
§
<
/
¢
Q �o
-he
-
�
a
\
gai
\
de
�
<
z
oE
�2
/
\
o/
7
E
2
2
E
E
eeOl
%;
Go
. �
\
&�

v
LLI r,4
LL 00
-4,r a:zv
co
op
<
,71
co
ca
u
LL
z 0
u 2�
2= _E
_k 0
0
CL
CL
Vkf_
u
N
z
m rn 0
---------- LL
V� cr
D
LLI
Ln
-_ _� _ r
LLI 0
Ln 0
LLI
L:
r14
z
CL
z
LLI
r,4 Z
ID
Z Ln r, -, 2
LLI 'o
850 2 r,4OU m 000 4
Lr; co o
0 _j
D
4� .
bio
m C: D 0
o
Q f
Q9.

§ ƒ § [ / 42i [ § §
%
§�
�
§
!
&
�
k
_
0
m
�
§ k
0
�
a
ljj
/
\
7
»
k
�
\
E
2
o
_ §
O
�
_ -Now,
.
r .

77-
z
0
w LU
a-
0
U-

wo.uejaaP SNOUIGNOD 31lS `JNIISIX3 0000
91,ZE'ZEE '60L d SZEO'EEE'bOL :A .# 3aa4S
ZOZ8Z JN'.p I,eyD ea a...S _q-9 N EZZ
2JVNN3P OLIozoI :#3aafad
ON `A1Nnoo -1-13ic iia `3P-11ASIiViS =110 ,kill NMOHSSV :aIeoS
W • a �.. V� N V /\m s IZOZ/SZ/Ol :a3a4
_ JAMES FARMi° ROAD EX7 -OHS
7'50' PUBLIC_ R/w ESMT PER oB an Pc 4�,. 412 aj3on N EHAOVal NOUVOI�ddV
_ —..
VALENCIA L
� � � �a �,—
W u � W
z_
o<
QLo
a s °P
_j o$
W Q ° L1J
� w
O
W
W
M P U �gRd 3Aildi2lU
W
Q z
Q �
w w
www —
i W
U� O
Lo ry
J
Q Q W
z 3
w O
W J
W J
w O
JAMES FARM ROAD EAT
30' PUBLIC F ESMT PER DB 417 PG 4�1, 412
k
\1
0
v
0
v o
O
N
W
J
Q
U
U 0

Sb333f18 HlIM NVId 31lS 7V'd3A0
100 I D
wo.uejaaP
9KE'ZEE 'toL d SZEO'EEE'bOL :A
ZOZ8Z JN'apoII iaa�iS _q-9 N EZZ
:# hays
2JVNN3P
OLIOZOI :#30910Jd
ON `A1Nnoo
�-13ic iiu `3P-11AS31`d1S =10 Ai10
NMOHSSV :9I120S
•
W dV/ Nb//\m IS
IZOZ/SZ/OI :aleG
-OHS
a38Wf1N ONIAOVH J1 NOI VOI�ddH
H IY
w w ry
w LL w
��
JAMES FARM+ROAD
s
Of LL LL
��m LL
-- 0' PUBLIC_ R/W ESMT
EXT
PER DB 417 PG 411,
m
a
—
412 r
w
w
LL c~n
o
LL m
1
m —
JAMES FARM
ROAD EXT
60' PUBLIC RAW ESMT PER DB 417 PC 411, 412
iieg
cn
+
\\\
Q I1 IE
9Locn
1
■
w
r
V)
¢ H
wIJ
_
vnLENan w
} p
LL
w
}
� r 1
a r�
¢ 0
m
}U
\
its
zH
CJ
w
11
■
I�,
i
���
.:dca.�
<
III
of Lu
Lu m LLu
LL Of LL
H
LL D
m U)
LL
gal
Q
�
ILL
z
w
w
zw Dof
IF —
of # 0~
m
of
� il: M U
W
_
w
U
N
U
�
CI18Rd
pp
g,71�i
x
u1
3N1d1dGS
XdMHX�H
tg tdfe
OOneS,�N�d'ddde
_
n1
g D
■ e :� i� w
= 1 �S , �� Q Z'
U
10
,Fi g
• - w w
1LL LL
m m
\N H Q
10
g U
' Q
o
l'
— 0 11,-� N
uU'^ u
G VJ Q
_ W
0 0`v)0
I z M > z
O — II W 0
I 0 wQ��
W
Lu
Lu Ow0
#a U ~ m
U 0 0- U 0- o

wo uejaaP dVW iDV(JWI GNV-l13M zoo I D
9KE'ZEE 'toL d SZEO'EEE'bOL :A .# 3aa4S
ZOZ8Z JN'a � qD iaa�iS _q-9 N EZZ
2JVNN3P 0LIOZOI :#3aafad
JN `A1Nnoo -1-13ic iia `3P-11ASIiViS =/\11O ,kill NMOHSSV :aIeoS
W • a �.. V� N V m IS IZOZ/SZ/Ol :a3a4
-OHS
aj3on N ONIAOVH J1 NOI VOI�ddH
U{
m
I
_
y
0)
z -
K
LOLIJ
I
U U
J
/ \ \ 11 D O Q Lu H
\ I \ \ \ U U I I LL rn Q Z
\ V 1 V A \ Q Q Q LL J O W Q
\ \ ( \ \ \ tl tl N p z I
o (n V N 11 Q j
\ 1 \ \ QC? Q I I I I m Q
\ o U
\, \ \ \� \ Q u g QyinQ Uzi
w 0 w Q Q LL
o i
\\ LLJ
o \ \ � z Q LU L Q QO w i
\ /\ mo = \ O w~ Q Q w 0 i
��� \ \\ 0 U Q Q U m!
LLI
i d J J Q �
O W W H Q a l
a ° Ir
\ \ 0 W
\ \ \\ azl
\\ \\ w Q�
— \ lii >
--�zi
00
z —
cncncn Ww \—
/ W W z W \ —
\ O U LLJ
\ W Q � W \
\\\ \\\\ \\ ��\ 7
854
i,/fill,\\\\� \\��`\\���\\`\
J J// J W\ X I i\ \ \\ \\\\\\\ \\
Q Q Q �` I I \ \\\M
W,
awl I wzzl m Q'\\\\��`\\�\�\\\&
LLJ
°'� wo \ v Q I \J \ 1\
Doe L,
mcnl z�w� Q \zW m oft
_ o F \ _ LI_I w \ \\ \\ \ \
z
W
LU
i
i
r7cn n� > _ \ \��� \ \ � \ a
_ m 77
LO
-------- � � � � ��_� _— LO _

o�u9is adpue�Nuvs
9KE'ZEE 'bOLW i SZEO'EEE'bOL :A
ZOZ8Z JN'a.. � qD '_"S _q-9 N EZZ
♦'
�x
CD
1 \
r
I
� z
iDVdWI ON) Z dVW iDVdWI GNV'113M
(
bJVNN31
ON `A1Nnoo 113ic iiu `3111AS3IiViS AO AiIO
WdV� N` Amns
I D
:# 3aa4S
OL IOZOI :# 3aafad
NMOHS SV :alaaS
l ZOZ/SZ/0l : a3a4
o
-OHS
aj3on N EMACHa1 NOUV01I ddH
JAIJJ�Im�
00
I� 1' I s)s 2I 1/ \ I ) 1 \ l\ Il l I �//
B74 8�8
a7o I \ �19 0�
8
1 1 W
Q
�lilt/�/lii/1i/
zQ
wLLJ
I 11
G%/IIIIII
E I
\ 1 \
jiLL- 1\; \
1 \ \ I /!�% lllllj I (I i �(__----
;0 LLJ 1✓ �1 Q �\ 1
r\ W (n z w
III
/ f JIIIJIII 11 �t�l I I I \\ „\\, \ Q
/ // A// �11v Q,
( Iltl\)/11 I} I Illl J j W C w U)
IIIIIIIp�/IIIIILo
x ��\I\` \\ L o
-
I/ \ J l \ z o
0 j LU
(�Lij

Q
U
Z
N CSAM

NC SAM FIELD ASSESSMENT RESULTS
user rvianuai version d.,i
USACE AID #: SAW-2020-01813 NCDWR #:
INSTRUCTIONS: Attach a sketch of the assessment area and photographs. Attach a copy of the USGS 7.5-minute topographic quadrangle,
and circle the location of the stream reach under evaluation. If multiple stream reaches will be evaluated on the same property, identify and
number all reaches on the attached map, and include a separate form for each reach. See the NC SAM User Manual for detailed descriptions
and explanations of requested information. Record in the "Notes/Sketch" section if supplementary measurements were performed. See the
NC SAM User Manual for examples of additional measurements that may be relevant.
NOTE EVIDENCE OF STRESSORS AFFECTING THE ASSESSMENT AREA (do not need to be within the assessment area).
PROJECT/SITE INFORMATION:
1. Project name (if any): Sullivan Farm 2. Date of evaluation: 9/3/2021
3. Applicant/owner name: Lennar 4. Assessor name/organization: H.Caldwell/WEPG
5. County: Iredell 6. Nearest named water body
7. River basin: Yadkin -Pee Dee on USGS 7.5-minute quad: Fourth Creek
8. Site coordinates (decimal degrees, at lower end of assessment reach): 35.828053N/-80.871371 W
STREAM INFORMATION: (depth and width can be approximations)
9. Site number (show on attached map): Stream B 10. Length of assessment reach evaluated (feet): 200
11. Channel depth from bed (in riffle, if present) to top of bank (feet): 6 ❑Unable to assess channel depth.
12. Channel width at top of bank (feet): 11 13. Is assessment reach a swamp steam? ❑Yes ❑No
14. Feature type: ®Perennial flow ❑Intermittent flow ❑Tidal Marsh Stream
STREAM CATEGORY INFORMATION:
15. NC SAM Zone: ❑ Mountains (M) ® Piedmont (P) ❑ Inner Coastal Plain (1) ❑ Outer Coastal Plain (0)
16. Estimated geomorphic ❑A ®B
valley shape (skip for
Tidal Marsh Stream): (more sinuous stream, flatter valley slope) (less sinuous stream, steeper valley slope)
17. Watershed size: (skip ®Size 1 (< 0.1 mil) ❑Size 2 (0.1 to < 0.5 mil) ❑Size 3 (0.5 to < 5 mil) ❑Size 4 (>_ 5 mil)
for Tidal Marsh Stream)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION:
18. Were regulatory considerations evaluated? ®Yes ❑No If Yes, check all that apply to the assessment area.
❑Section 10 water ❑Classified Trout Waters ❑Water Supply Watershed (❑l ❑II ❑III ❑IV ❑V)
❑Essential Fish Habitat ❑Primary Nursery Area ❑ High Quality Waters/Outstanding Resource Waters
❑Publicly owned property ❑NCDWR Riparian buffer rule in effect ❑Nutrient Sensitive Waters
❑Anadromous fish ❑303(d) List ❑CAMA Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)
❑Documented presence of a federal and/or state listed protected species within the assessment area.
List species:
❑Designated Critical Habitat (list species)
19. Are additional stream information/supplementary measurements included in "Notes/Sketch" section or attached? ®Yes ❑No
1. Channel Water— assessment reach metric (skip for Size 1 streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
®A Water throughout assessment reach.
❑B No flow, water in pools only.
❑C No water in assessment reach.
2. Evidence of Flow Restriction — assessment reach metric
❑A At least 10% of assessment reach in -stream habitat or riffle -pool sequence is severely affected by a flow restriction or fill to the
point of obstructing flow or a channel choked with aquatic macrophytes or ponded water or impoundment on flood or ebb within
the assessment reach (examples: undersized or perched culverts, causeways that constrict the channel, tidal gates, debris jams,
beaver dams).
®B Not
3. Feature Pattern — assessment reach metric
❑A A majority of the assessment reach has altered pattern (examples: straightening, modification above or below culvert).
®B Not
4. Feature Longitudinal Profile — assessment reach metric
®A Majority of assessment reach has a substantially altered stream profile (examples: channel down -cutting, existing damming, over
widening, active aggradation, dredging, and excavation where appropriate channel profile has not reformed from any of these
disturbances).
❑B Not
5. Signs of Active Instability — assessment reach metric
Consider only current instability, not past events from which the stream has currently recovered. Examples of instability include
active bank failure, active channel down -cutting (head -cut), active widening, and artificial hardening (such as concrete, gabion, rip -rap).
❑A < 10% of channel unstable
❑B 10 to 25% of channel unstable
®C > 25% of channel unstable

6. Streamside Area Interaction — streamside area metric
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB).
LB RB
❑A ❑A
Little or no evidence of conditions that adversely affect reference interaction
❑B ❑B
Moderate evidence of conditions (examples: berms, levees, down -cutting, aggradation, dredging) that adversely affect
reference interaction (examples: limited streamside area access, disruption of flood flows through streamside area, leaky
or intermittent bulkheads, causeways with floodplain constriction, minor ditching [including mosquito ditching])
®C ®C
Extensive evidence of conditions that adversely affect reference interaction (little to no floodplain/intertidal zone access
[examples: causeways with floodplain and channel constriction, bulkheads, retaining walls, fill, stream incision, disruption
of flood flows through streamside area] or too much floodplain/intertidal zone access [examples: impoundments, intensive
mosquito ditching]) or floodplain/intertidal zone unnaturally absent or assessment reach is a man-made feature on an
interstream divide
Water Quality Stressors — assessment reach/intertidal zone metric
Check all that apply.
❑A Discolored water in stream or intertidal zone (milky white, blue, unnatural water discoloration, oil sheen, stream foam)
❑B Excessive sedimentation (burying of stream features or intertidal zone)
®C Noticeable evidence of pollutant discharges entering the assessment reach and causing a water quality problem
❑D Odor (not including natural sulfide odors)
❑E Current published or collected data indicating degraded water quality in the assessment reach. Cite source in "Notes/Sketch"
section.
❑F Livestock with access to stream or intertidal zone
❑G Excessive algae in stream or intertidal zone
❑H Degraded marsh vegetation in the intertidal zone (removal, burning, regular mowing, destruction, etc)
®I Other: (explain in "Notes/Sketch" section)
❑J Little to no stressors
8. Recent Weather — watershed metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
For Size 1 or 2 streams, D1 drought or higher is considered a drought; for Size 3 or 4 streams, D2 drought or higher is considered a drought.
❑A Drought conditions and no rainfall or rainfall not exceeding 1 inch within the last 48 hours
❑B Drought conditions and rainfall exceeding 1 inch within the last 48 hours
®C No drought conditions
9. Large or Dangerous Stream — assessment reach metric
❑Yes ®No Is stream is too large or dangerous to assess? If Yes, skip to Metric 13 (Streamside Area Ground Surface Condition).
10. Natural In -stream Habitat Types — assessment reach metric
10a. ❑Yes ❑No Degraded in -stream habitat over majority of the assessment reach (examples of stressors include excessive
sedimentation, mining, excavation, in -stream hardening [for example, rip -rap], recent dredging, and snagging)
(evaluate for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams only, then skip to Metric 12)
10b. Check all that occur (occurs if > 5% coverage of assessment reach) (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams)
❑A Multiple aquatic macrophytes and aquatic mosses F, W ❑F 5% oysters or other natural hard bottoms
(include liverworts, lichens, and algal mats) 2 E ❑G Submerged aquatic vegetation
❑B Multiple sticks and/or leaf packs and/or emergent o w ❑H Low -tide refugia (pools)
vegetation Y U)C ❑I Sand bottom
❑C Multiple snags and logs (including lap trees) r ❑J 5% vertical bank along the marsh
®D 5% undercut banks and/or root mats and/or roots ❑K Little or no habitat
in banks extend to the normal wetted perimeter
❑E Little or no habitat
*********************************REMAINING QUESTIONS ARE NOT APPLICABLE FOR TIDAL MARSH STREAMS****************************
11. Bedform and Substrate —assessment reach metric (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
11a. ❑Yes ®No Is assessment reach in a natural sand -bed stream? (skip for Coastal Plain streams)
11 b. Bedform evaluated. Check the appropriate box(es).
®A Riffle -run section (evaluate 11c)
❑B Pool -glide section (evaluate 11d)
❑C Natural bedform absent (skip to Metric 12, Aquatic Life)
11 c. In riffle sections, check all that occur below the normal wetted perimeter of the assessment reach — whether or not submerged. Check
at least one box in each row (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams). Not Present (NP) = absent, Rare
(R) = present but < 10%, Common (C) _ > 10-40%, Abundant (A) _ > 40-70%, Predominant (P) _ > 70%. Cumulative percentages
should not exceed 100% for each assessment reach.
NP R C A P
❑ ® ❑ ❑ ❑ Bedrock/saprolite
❑ ® ❑ ❑ ❑ Boulder (256 — 4096 mm)
❑ ❑ ® ❑ ❑ Cobble (64 — 256 mm)
❑ ❑ ® ❑ ❑ Gravel (2 — 64 mm)
❑ ❑ ❑ ® ❑ Sand (.062 — 2 mm)
❑ ❑ ❑ ® ❑ Silt/clay (< 0.062 mm)
❑ ❑ ® ❑ ❑ Detritus
❑ ® ❑ ❑ ❑ Artificial (rip -rap, concrete, etc.)
11d. ❑Yes ®No Are pools filled with sediment? (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)

12
Aquatic Life — assessment reach metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
12a. ®Yes ❑No Was an in -stream aquatic life assessment performed as described in the User Manual?
If No, select one of the following reasons and skip to Metric 13. ❑No Water ❑Other:
12b. ®Yes ❑No Are aquatic organisms present in the assessment reach (look in riffles, pools, then snags)? If Yes, check all that
apply. If No, skip to Metric 13.
1 >1 Numbers over columns refer to "individuals" for Size 1 and 2 streams and "taxa" for Size 3 and 4 streams.
® ❑Adult frogs
❑ ❑Aquatic reptiles
❑ ❑Aquatic macrophytes and aquatic mosses (include liverworts, lichens, and algal mats)
❑ ❑Beetles
❑ ❑Caddisfly larvae (T)
❑ ❑Asian clam (Corbicula)
® ❑Crustacean (isopod/amphipod/crayfish/shrimp)
❑ ❑Damselfly and dragonfly larvae
❑ ❑Dipterans
❑ ❑Mayfly larvae (E)
❑ ❑Megaloptera (alderfly, fishfly, dobsonfly larvae)
❑ ®Midges/mosquito larvae
❑ ❑Mosquito fish (Gambusia) or mud minnows (Umbra pygmaea)
❑ ❑Mussels/Clams (not Corbicula)
❑ ❑Other fish
❑ ❑ Sala manders/tad poles
® ❑Snails
❑ ❑Stonefly larvae (P)
❑ ❑Tipulid larvae
❑ ❑Worms/leeches
13. Streamside Area Ground Surface Condition — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams and B valley types)
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB). Consider storage capacity with regard to both overbank flow and upland runoff.
LB RB
❑A ❑A Little or no alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area
®B ®B Moderate alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area
❑C ❑C Severe alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area (examples: ditches, fill, soil compaction,
livestock disturbance, buildings, man-made levees, drainage pipes)
14. Streamside Area Water Storage — streamside area metric (skip for Size 1 streams, Tidal Marsh Streams, and B valley types)
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB) of the streamside area.
LB RB
❑A ❑A Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water >_ 6 inches deep
❑B ❑B Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water 3 to 6 inches deep
®C ®C Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water < 3 inches deep
15. Wetland Presence — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB). Do not consider wetlands outside of the streamside area or within the normal
wetted perimeter of assessment reach.
LB RB
❑Y ®Y Are wetlands present in the streamside area?
®N ❑N
16. Baseflow Contributors — assessment reach metric (skip for Size 4 streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all contributors within the assessment reach or within view of and draining to the assessment reach.
❑A Streams and/or springs (jurisdictional discharges)
❑B Ponds (include wet detention basins; do not include sediment basins or dry detention basins)
❑C Obstruction passing flow during low -flow periods within the assessment area (beaver dam, leaky dam, bottom -release dam, weir)
❑D Evidence of bank seepage or sweating (iron in water indicates seepage)
®E Stream bed or bank soil reduced (dig through deposited sediment if present)
❑F None of the above
17. Baseflow Detractors — assessment area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all that apply.
❑A Evidence of substantial water withdrawals from the assessment reach (includes areas excavated for pump installation)
❑B Obstruction not passing flow during low -flow periods affecting the assessment reach (ex: watertight dam, sediment deposit)
®C Urban stream (>_ 24% impervious surface for watershed)
❑D Evidence that the streamside area has been modified resulting in accelerated drainage into the assessment reach
❑E Assessment reach relocated to valley edge
❑F None of the above
18. Shading — assessment reach metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider aspect. Consider "leaf -on" condition.
®A Stream shading is appropriate for stream category (may include gaps associated with natural processes)
❑B Degraded (example: scattered trees)
❑C Stream shading is gone or largely absent

19. Buffer Width — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider "vegetated buffer" and "wooded buffer" separately for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB) starting at the top of bank out
to the first break.
Vegetated Wooded
LB RB LB RB
®A ®A ❑A ®A >_ 100 feet wide or extends to the edge of the watershed
❑B ❑B ®B ❑B From 50 to < 100 feet wide
❑C ❑C ❑C ❑C From 30 to < 50 feet wide
❑D ❑D ❑D ❑D From 10 to < 30 feet wide
❑E ❑E ❑E ❑E < 10 feet wide or no trees
20. Buffer Structure — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB) for Metric 19 ("Vegetated" Buffer Width).
LB RB
❑A ❑A Mature forest
®B ®B Non -mature woody vegetation or modified vegetation structure
❑C ❑C Herbaceous vegetation with or without a strip of trees < 10 feet wide
❑D ❑D Maintained shrubs
❑E ❑E Little or no vegetation
21. Buffer Stressors — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all appropriate boxes for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB). Indicate if listed stressor abuts stream (Abuts), does not abut but is
within 30 feet of stream (< 30 feet), or is between 30 to 50 feet of stream (30-50 feet).
If none of the following stressors occurs on either bank, check here and skip to Metric 22: ❑
Abuts < 30 feet 30-50 feet
LB RB LB RB LB RB
❑A ❑A ❑A ❑A ®A ❑A Row crops
❑B ❑B ❑B ❑B ❑B ❑B Maintained turf
❑C ❑C ❑C ❑C ❑C ❑C Pasture (no livestock)/commercial horticulture
❑D ❑D ❑D ❑D ❑D ❑D Pasture (active livestock use)
22. Stem Density — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB) for Metric 19 ("Wooded" Buffer Width).
LB RB
®A ®A Medium to high stem density
❑B ❑B Low stem density
❑C ❑C No wooded riparian buffer or predominantly herbaceous species or bare ground
23. Continuity of Vegetated Buffer — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider whether vegetated buffer is continuous along stream (parallel). Breaks are areas lacking vegetation > 10 feet wide.
LB RB
®A ®A The total length of buffer breaks is < 25 percent.
❑B ❑B The total length of buffer breaks is between 25 and 50 percent.
❑C ❑C The total length of buffer breaks is > 50 percent.
24. Vegetative Composition — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Evaluate the dominant vegetation within 100 feet of each bank or to the edge of the watershed (whichever comes first) as it contributes to
assessment reach habitat.
LB RB
❑A ❑A Vegetation is close to undisturbed in species present and their proportions. Lower strata composed of native species,
with non-native invasive species absent or sparse.
®B ®B Vegetation indicates disturbance in terms of species diversity or proportions, but is still largely composed of native
species. This may include communities of weedy native species that develop after clear -cutting or clearing or
communities with non-native invasive species present, but not dominant, over a large portion of the expected strata or
communities missing understory but retaining canopy trees.
❑C ❑C Vegetation is severely disturbed in terms of species diversity or proportions. Mature canopy is absent or communities
with non-native invasive species dominant over a large portion of expected strata or communities composed of planted
stands of non -characteristic species or communities inappropriately composed of a single species or no vegetation.
25. Conductivity — assessment reach metric (skip for all Coastal Plain streams)
25a. ❑Yes ®No Was conductivity measurement recorded?
If No, select one of the following reasons. ❑No Water ❑Other:
25b. Check the box corresponding to the conductivity measurement (units of microsiemens per centimeter).
❑A < 46 ❑B 46 to < 67 ❑C 67 to < 79 ❑D 79 to < 230 ❑E >_ 230
Notes/Sketch:
Very incised stream. Majority of hydrology originationg from storm flows from adjacent residential areas and agricultural fields

Draft NC SAM Stream Rating Sheet
Accompanies User Manual Version 2.1
Stream Site Name Sullivan Farm Date of Assessment 9/3/2021
Stream Category Pb1 Assessor Name/Organization H.Caldwell/WEPG
Notes of Field Assessment Form (Y/N)
YES
Presence of regulatory considerations (Y/N)
NO
Additional stream information/supplementary measurements included (Y/N)
YES
NC SAM feature type (perennial, intermittent, Tidal Marsh Stream)
Perennial
USACE/ NCDWR
Function Class Rating Summary
All Streams Intermittent
(1) Hydrology
LOW
(2) Baseflow
MEDIUM
(2) Flood Flow
LOW
(3) Streamside Area Attenuation
LOW
(4) Floodplain Access
LOW
(4) Wooded Riparian Buffer
HIGH
(4) Microtopography
NA
(3) Stream Stability
LOW
(4) Channel Stability
LOW
(4) Sediment Transport
LOW
(4) Stream Geomorphology
MEDIUM
(2) Stream/Intertidal Zone Interaction
NA
(2) Longitudinal Tidal Flow
NA
(2) Tidal Marsh Stream Stability
NA
(3) Tidal Marsh Channel Stability
NA
(3) Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology
NA
(1) Water Quality
LOW
(2) Baseflow
MEDIUM
(2) Streamside Area Vegetation
HIGH
(3) Upland Pollutant Filtration
HIGH
(3) Thermoregulation
HIGH
(2) Indicators of Stressors
YES
(2) Aquatic Life Tolerance
LOW
(2) Intertidal Zone Filtration
NA
(1) Habitat
MEDIUM
(2) In -stream Habitat
LOW
(3) Baseflow
MEDIUM
(3) Substrate
LOW
(3) Stream Stability
LOW
(3) In -stream Habitat
LOW
(2) Stream -side Habitat
HIGH
(3) Stream -side Habitat
MEDIUM
(3) Thermoregulation
HIGH
(2) Tidal Marsh In -stream Habitat
NA
(3) Flow Restriction
NA
(3) Tidal Marsh Stream Stability
NA
(4) Tidal Marsh Channel Stability
NA
(4) Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology
NA
(3) Tidal Marsh In -stream Habitat
NA
(2) Intertidal Zone
NA
Overall
LOW

NC SAM FIELD ASSESSMENT RESULTS
Accompanies User Manual Version 2.1
USACE AID #: SAW-2020-01813 NCDWR #:
INSTRUCTIONS: Attach a sketch of the assessment area and photographs. Attach a copy of the USGS 7.5-minute topographic quadrangle,
and circle the location of the stream reach under evaluation. If multiple stream reaches will be evaluated on the same property, identify and
number all reaches on the attached map, and include a separate form for each reach. See the NC SAM User Manual for detailed descriptions
and explanations of requested information. Record in the "Notes/Sketch" section if supplementary measurements were performed. See the
NC SAM User Manual for examples of additional measurements that may be relevant.
NOTE EVIDENCE OF STRESSORS AFFECTING THE ASSESSMENT AREA (do not need to be within the assessment area).
PROJECT/SITE INFORMATION:
1. Project name (if any): Sullivan Farm 2. Date of evaluation: 9/3/2021
3. Applicant/owner name: Lennar 4. Assessor name/organization: H.Caldwell/WEPG
5. County: Iredell 6. Nearest named water body
7. River basin: Yadkin-PeeDee on USGS 7.5-minute quad: Fourth Creek
8. Site coordinates (decimal degrees, at lower end of assessment reach): 35.828248N/-80.870664W
STREAM INFORMATION: (depth and width can be approximations)
9. Site number (show on attached map): Stream C 10. Length of assessment reach evaluated (feet): 200
11. Channel depth from bed (in riffle, if present) to top of bank (feet): .5 ❑Unable to assess channel depth.
12. Channel width at top of bank (feet): 4 13. Is assessment reach a swamp steam? ❑Yes ❑No
14. Feature type: ❑Perennial flow ®Intermittent flow ❑Tidal Marsh Stream
STREAM CATEGORY INFORMATION:
15. NC SAM Zone: ❑ Mountains (M) ® Piedmont (P) ❑ Inner Coastal Plain (1) ❑ Outer Coastal Plain (0)
16. Estimated geomorphic ®A El
valley shape (skip for
Tidal Marsh Stream): (more sinuous stream, flatter valley slope) (less sinuous stream, steeper valley slope)
17. Watershed size: (skip ®Size 1 (< 0.1 mil) ❑Size 2 (0.1 to < 0.5 mil) ❑Size 3 (0.5 to < 5 mil) ❑Size 4 (>_ 5 mil)
for Tidal Marsh Stream)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION:
18. Were regulatory considerations evaluated? ®Yes ❑No If Yes, check all that apply to the assessment area.
❑Section 10 water ❑Classified Trout Waters ❑Water Supply Watershed (❑l ❑II ❑III ❑IV ❑V)
❑Essential Fish Habitat ❑Primary Nursery Area ❑ High Quality Waters/Outstanding Resource Waters
❑Publicly owned property ❑NCDWR Riparian buffer rule in effect ❑Nutrient Sensitive Waters
❑Anadromous fish ❑303(d) List ❑CAMA Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)
❑Documented presence of a federal and/or state listed protected species within the assessment area.
List species:
❑Designated Critical Habitat (list species)
19. Are additional stream information/supplementary measurements included in "Notes/Sketch" section or attached? ®Yes ❑No
1. Channel Water -assessment reach metric (skip for Size 1 streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
®A Water throughout assessment reach.
❑B No flow, water in pools only.
❑C No water in assessment reach.
2. Evidence of Flow Restriction - assessment reach metric
❑A At least 10% of assessment reach in -stream habitat or riffle -pool sequence is severely affected by a flow restriction or fill to the
point of obstructing flow or a channel choked with aquatic macrophytes or ponded water or impoundment on flood or ebb within
the assessment reach (examples: undersized or perched culverts, causeways that constrict the channel, tidal gates, debris jams,
beaver dams).
®B Not
3. Feature Pattern - assessment reach metric
®A A majority of the assessment reach has altered pattern (examples: straightening, modification above or below culvert).
❑B Not
4. Feature Longitudinal Profile - assessment reach metric
❑A Majority of assessment reach has a substantially altered stream profile (examples: channel down -cutting, existing damming, over
widening, active aggradation, dredging, and excavation where appropriate channel profile has not reformed from any of these
disturbances).
®B Not
5. Signs of Active Instability - assessment reach metric
Consider only current instability, not past events from which the stream has currently recovered. Examples of instability include
active bank failure, active channel down -cutting (head -cut), active widening, and artificial hardening (such as concrete, gabion, rip -rap).
❑A < 10% of channel unstable
®B 10 to 25% of channel unstable
❑C > 25% of channel unstable

6. Streamside Area Interaction — streamside area metric
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB).
LB RB
®A ®A
Little or no evidence of conditions that adversely affect reference interaction
❑B ❑B
Moderate evidence of conditions (examples: berms, levees, down -cutting, aggradation, dredging) that adversely affect
reference interaction (examples: limited streamside area access, disruption of flood flows through streamside area, leaky
or intermittent bulkheads, causeways with floodplain constriction, minor ditching [including mosquito ditching])
❑C ❑C
Extensive evidence of conditions that adversely affect reference interaction (little to no floodplain/intertidal zone access
[examples: causeways with floodplain and channel constriction, bulkheads, retaining walls, fill, stream incision, disruption
of flood flows through streamside area] or too much floodplain/intertidal zone access [examples: impoundments, intensive
mosquito ditching]) or floodplain/intertidal zone unnaturally absent or assessment reach is a man-made feature on an
interstream divide
Water Quality Stressors — assessment reach/intertidal zone metric
Check all that apply.
❑A Discolored water in stream or intertidal zone (milky white, blue, unnatural water discoloration, oil sheen, stream foam)
❑B Excessive sedimentation (burying of stream features or intertidal zone)
®C Noticeable evidence of pollutant discharges entering the assessment reach and causing a water quality problem
❑D Odor (not including natural sulfide odors)
❑E Current published or collected data indicating degraded water quality in the assessment reach. Cite source in "Notes/Sketch"
section.
❑F Livestock with access to stream or intertidal zone
❑G Excessive algae in stream or intertidal zone
❑H Degraded marsh vegetation in the intertidal zone (removal, burning, regular mowing, destruction, etc)
®I Other: (explain in "Notes/Sketch" section)
❑J Little to no stressors
8. Recent Weather — watershed metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
For Size 1 or 2 streams, D1 drought or higher is considered a drought; for Size 3 or 4 streams, D2 drought or higher is considered a drought.
❑A Drought conditions and no rainfall or rainfall not exceeding 1 inch within the last 48 hours
❑B Drought conditions and rainfall exceeding 1 inch within the last 48 hours
®C No drought conditions
9. Large or Dangerous Stream — assessment reach metric
❑Yes ®No Is stream is too large or dangerous to assess? If Yes, skip to Metric 13 (Streamside Area Ground Surface Condition).
10. Natural In -stream Habitat Types — assessment reach metric
10a. ❑Yes ❑No Degraded in -stream habitat over majority of the assessment reach (examples of stressors include excessive
sedimentation, mining, excavation, in -stream hardening [for example, rip -rap], recent dredging, and snagging)
(evaluate for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams only, then skip to Metric 12)
10b. Check all that occur (occurs if > 5% coverage of assessment reach)
(skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams)
❑A
Multiple aquatic macrophytes and aquatic mosses
W
❑F
5% oysters or other natural hard bottoms
(include liverworts, lichens, and algal mats)
M
❑G
Submerged aquatic vegetation
®B
Multiple sticks and/or leaf packs and/or emergent
o w
❑H
Low -tide refugia (pools)
vegetation
Y r
❑I
Sand bottom
❑C
Multiple snags and logs (including lap trees)
r
❑J
5% vertical bank along the marsh
❑D
5% undercut banks and/or root mats and/or roots
0 :5
❑K
Little or no habitat
in banks extend to the normal wetted perimeter
❑E
Little or no habitat
*********************************REMAINING QUESTIONS ARE NOT APPLICABLE FOR TIDAL MARSH STREAMS****************************
11. Bedform and Substrate —assessment reach metric (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
11a. ❑Yes ®No Is assessment reach in a natural sand -bed stream? (skip for Coastal Plain streams)
11 b. Bedform evaluated. Check the appropriate box(es).
®A Riffle -run section (evaluate 11c)
❑B Pool -glide section (evaluate 11d)
❑C Natural bedform absent (skip to Metric 12, Aquatic Life)
11 c. In riffle sections, check all that occur below the normal wetted perimeter of the assessment reach — whether or not submerged. Check
at least one box in each row (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams). Not Present (NP) = absent, Rare
(R) = present but < 10%, Common (C) _ > 10-40%, Abundant (A) _ > 40-70%, Predominant (P) _ > 70%. Cumulative percentages
should not exceed 100% for each assessment reach.
NP R C A P
® ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Bedrock/saprolite
® ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Boulder (256 — 4096 mm)
® ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Cobble (64 — 256 mm)
❑ ® ❑ ❑ ❑ Gravel (2 — 64 mm)
❑ ® ❑ ❑ ❑ Sand (.062 — 2 mm)
❑ ❑ ❑ ® ❑ Silt/clay (< 0.062 mm)
❑ ❑ ® ❑ ❑ Detritus
❑ ❑ ® ❑ ❑ Artificial (rip -rap, concrete, etc.)
11d. ❑Yes ®No Are pools filled with sediment? (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)

12
Aquatic Life — assessment reach metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
12a. ®Yes ❑No Was an in -stream aquatic life assessment performed as described in the User Manual?
If No, select one of the following reasons and skip to Metric 13. ❑No Water ❑Other:
12b. ®Yes ❑No Are aquatic organisms present in the assessment reach (look in riffles, pools, then snags)? If Yes, check all that
apply. If No, skip to Metric 13.
1 >1 Numbers over columns refer to "individuals" for Size 1 and 2 streams and "taxa" for Size 3 and 4 streams.
❑ ❑Adult frogs
❑ ❑Aquatic reptiles
❑ ❑Aquatic macrophytes and aquatic mosses (include liverworts, lichens, and algal mats)
❑ ❑Beetles
❑ ❑Caddisfly larvae (T)
❑ ❑Asian clam (Corbicula)
❑ ❑Crustacean (isopod/a mph ipod/crayfish/sh ri mp)
❑ ❑Damselfly and dragonfly larvae
❑ ❑Dipterans
❑ ❑Mayfly larvae (E)
❑ ❑Megaloptera (alderfly, fishfly, dobsonfly larvae)
❑ ®Midges/mosquito larvae
❑ ❑Mosquito fish (Gambusia) or mud minnows (Umbra pygmaea)
❑ ❑Mussels/Clams (not Corbicula)
❑ ❑Other fish
❑ ❑ Sala manders/tad poles
❑ ❑Snails
❑ ❑Stonefly larvae (P)
❑ ❑Tipulid larvae
❑ ❑Worms/leeches
13. Streamside Area Ground Surface Condition — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams and B valley types)
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB). Consider storage capacity with regard to both overbank flow and upland runoff.
LB RB
❑A ❑A Little or no alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area
®B ❑B Moderate alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area
❑C ®C Severe alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area (examples: ditches, fill, soil compaction,
livestock disturbance, buildings, man-made levees, drainage pipes)
14. Streamside Area Water Storage — streamside area metric (skip for Size 1 streams, Tidal Marsh Streams, and B valley types)
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB) of the streamside area.
LB RB
❑A ❑A Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water >_ 6 inches deep
❑B ❑B Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water 3 to 6 inches deep
®C ®C Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water < 3 inches deep
15. Wetland Presence — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB). Do not consider wetlands outside of the streamside area or within the normal
wetted perimeter of assessment reach.
LB RB
❑Y ❑Y Are wetlands present in the streamside area?
®N ®N
16. Baseflow Contributors — assessment reach metric (skip for Size 4 streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all contributors within the assessment reach or within view of and draining to the assessment reach.
❑A Streams and/or springs (jurisdictional discharges)
❑B Ponds (include wet detention basins; do not include sediment basins or dry detention basins)
❑C Obstruction passing flow during low -flow periods within the assessment area (beaver dam, leaky dam, bottom -release dam, weir)
❑D Evidence of bank seepage or sweating (iron in water indicates seepage)
®E Stream bed or bank soil reduced (dig through deposited sediment if present)
❑F None of the above
17. Baseflow Detractors — assessment area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all that apply.
❑A Evidence of substantial water withdrawals from the assessment reach (includes areas excavated for pump installation)
❑B Obstruction not passing flow during low -flow periods affecting the assessment reach (ex: watertight dam, sediment deposit)
®C Urban stream (>_ 24% impervious surface for watershed)
®D Evidence that the streamside area has been modified resulting in accelerated drainage into the assessment reach
❑E Assessment reach relocated to valley edge
❑F None of the above
18. Shading — assessment reach metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider aspect. Consider "leaf -on" condition.
❑A Stream shading is appropriate for stream category (may include gaps associated with natural processes)
®B Degraded (example: scattered trees)
❑C Stream shading is gone or largely absent

19. Buffer Width — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider "vegetated buffer" and "wooded buffer" separately for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB) starting at the top of bank out
to the first break.
Vegetated Wooded
LB RB LB RB
®A ®A ®A ❑A >_ 100 feet wide or extends to the edge of the watershed
❑B ❑B ❑B ®B From 50 to < 100 feet wide
❑C ❑C ❑C ❑C From 30 to < 50 feet wide
❑D ❑D ❑D ❑D From 10 to < 30 feet wide
❑E ❑E ❑E ❑E < 10 feet wide or no trees
20. Buffer Structure — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB) for Metric 19 ("Vegetated" Buffer Width).
LB RB
❑A ❑A Mature forest
®B ®B Non -mature woody vegetation or modified vegetation structure
❑C ❑C Herbaceous vegetation with or without a strip of trees < 10 feet wide
❑D ❑D Maintained shrubs
❑E ❑E Little or no vegetation
21. Buffer Stressors — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all appropriate boxes for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB). Indicate if listed stressor abuts stream (Abuts), does not abut but is
within 30 feet of stream (< 30 feet), or is between 30 to 50 feet of stream (30-50 feet).
If none of the following stressors occurs on either bank, check here and skip to Metric 22: ❑
Abuts < 30 feet 30-50 feet
LB RB LB RB LB RB
❑A ❑A ❑A ❑A ®A ❑A Row crops
❑B ❑B ❑B ❑B ❑B ®B Maintained turf
❑C ❑C ❑C ❑C ❑C ❑C Pasture (no livestock)/commercial horticulture
❑D ❑D ❑D ❑D ❑D ❑D Pasture (active livestock use)
22. Stem Density — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB) for Metric 19 ("Wooded" Buffer Width).
LB RB
®A ®A Medium to high stem density
❑B ❑B Low stem density
❑C ❑C No wooded riparian buffer or predominantly herbaceous species or bare ground
23. Continuity of Vegetated Buffer — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider whether vegetated buffer is continuous along stream (parallel). Breaks are areas lacking vegetation > 10 feet wide.
LB RB
®A ®A The total length of buffer breaks is < 25 percent.
❑B ❑B The total length of buffer breaks is between 25 and 50 percent.
❑C ❑C The total length of buffer breaks is > 50 percent.
24. Vegetative Composition — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Evaluate the dominant vegetation within 100 feet of each bank or to the edge of the watershed (whichever comes first) as it contributes to
assessment reach habitat.
LB RB
❑A ❑A Vegetation is close to undisturbed in species present and their proportions. Lower strata composed of native species,
with non-native invasive species absent or sparse.
®B ®B Vegetation indicates disturbance in terms of species diversity or proportions, but is still largely composed of native
species. This may include communities of weedy native species that develop after clear -cutting or clearing or
communities with non-native invasive species present, but not dominant, over a large portion of the expected strata or
communities missing understory but retaining canopy trees.
❑C ❑C Vegetation is severely disturbed in terms of species diversity or proportions. Mature canopy is absent or communities
with non-native invasive species dominant over a large portion of expected strata or communities composed of planted
stands of non -characteristic species or communities inappropriately composed of a single species or no vegetation.
25. Conductivity— assessment reach metric (skip for all Coastal Plain streams)
25a. ❑Yes ®No Was conductivity measurement recorded?
If No, select one of the following reasons. ❑No Water ❑Other:
25b. Check the box corresponding to the conductivity measurement (units of microsiemens per centimeter).
❑A < 46 ❑B 46 to < 67 ❑C 67 to < 79 ❑D 79 to < 230 ❑E >_ 230
Notes/Sketch:
Majority of hydrology originationg from storm flows from adjacent residential areas and agricultural fields.

Draft NC SAM Stream Rating Sheet
Accompanies User Manual Version 2.1
Stream Site Name Sullivan Farm Date of Assessment 9/3/2021
Stream Category Pal Assessor Name/Organization H.Caldwell/WEPG
Notes of Field Assessment Form (Y/N)
YES
Presence of regulatory considerations (Y/N)
NO
Additional stream information/supplementary measurements included (Y/N)
YES
NC SAM feature type (perennial, intermittent, Tidal Marsh Stream)
Intermittent
USACE/
NCDWR
Function Class Rating Summary
All Streams
Intermittent
(1) Hydrology
MEDIUM
MEDIUM
(2) Baseflow
MEDIUM
MEDIUM
(2) Flood Flow
MEDIUM
MEDIUM
(3) Streamside Area Attenuation
HIGH
HIGH
(4) Floodplain Access
HIGH
HIGH
(4) Wooded Riparian Buffer
HIGH
HIGH
(4) Microtopography
LOW
LOW
(3) Stream Stability
LOW
LOW
(4) Channel Stability
MEDIUM
MEDIUM
(4) Sediment Transport
LOW
LOW
(4) Stream Geomorphology
MEDIUM
MEDIUM
(2) Stream/Intertidal Zone Interaction
NA
NA
(2) Longitudinal Tidal Flow
NA
NA
(2) Tidal Marsh Stream Stability
NA
NA
(3) Tidal Marsh Channel Stability
NA
NA
(3) Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology
NA
NA
(1) Water Quality
LOW
LOW
(2) Baseflow
MEDIUM
MEDIUM
(2) Streamside Area Vegetation
MEDIUM
MEDIUM
(3) Upland Pollutant Filtration
MEDIUM
MEDIUM
(3) Thermoregulation
MEDIUM
MEDIUM
(2) Indicators of Stressors
YES
YES
(2) Aquatic Life Tolerance
LOW
NA
(2) Intertidal Zone Filtration
NA
NA
(1) Habitat
LOW
HIGH
(2) In -stream Habitat
LOW
MEDIUM
(3) Baseflow
MEDIUM
MEDIUM
(3) Substrate
LOW
LOW
(3) Stream Stability
MEDIUM
MEDIUM
(3) In -stream Habitat
LOW
HIGH
(2) Stream -side Habitat
HIGH
HIGH
(3) Stream -side Habitat
HIGH
HIGH
(3) Thermoregulation
MEDIUM
MEDIUM
(2) Tidal Marsh In -stream Habitat
NA
NA
(3) Flow Restriction
NA
NA
(3) Tidal Marsh Stream Stability
NA
NA
(4) Tidal Marsh Channel Stability
NA
NA
(4) Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology
NA
NA
(3) Tidal Marsh In -stream Habitat
NA
NA
(2) Intertidal Zone
NA
NA
Overall
LOW
MEDIUM

O
.4-j
co
.E
w
jurisdictional
Determination Information

U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
WILMINGTON DISTRICT
Action Id. SAW-2020-01813 County: Iredell U.S.G.S. Quad: NC- Statesville East
NOTIFICATION OF JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
Requestor: Lennar Homes
Matt Pannell
Address: 6701 Carmel Road, SET 425
Charlotte, NC 28226
Telephone Number: [phone]
E-mail: matt.pannelWlennar.com
Size (acres) 90 Nearest Town Statesville
Nearest Waterway Fourth Creek River Basin Upper Pee Dee
USGS HUC 03040102 Coordinates Latitude: 35.8275
Longitude:-80.8674
Location description: Project is located NW of Glenway Drive and James Farm Road, near the town of Statesville, Iredell
County, North Carolina. Parcel can be identified by PIN 4746507758.
Indicate Which of the Following Apply:
A. Preliminary Determination
® There appear to be waters on the above described project area/property, that may be subject to Section 404 of the Clean Water
Act (CWA)(33 USC § 1344) and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) (33 USC § 403). The waters have been
delineated, and the delineation has been verified by the Corps to be sufficiently accurate and reliable. The approximate boundaries
of these waters are shown on the enclosed delineation map dated 11/17/2020. Therefore this preliminary jurisdiction
determination may be used in the permit evaluation process, including determining compensatory mitigation. For purposes of
computation of impacts, compensatory mitigation requirements, and other resource protection measures, a permit decision made
on the basis of a preliminary JD will treat all waters and wetlands that would be affected in any way by the permitted activity on
the site as if they are jurisdictional waters of the U.S. This preliminary determination is not an appealable action under the
Regulatory Program Administrative Appeal Process (Reference 33 CFR Part 331). However, you may request an approved JD,
which is an appealable action, by contacting the Corps district for further instruction.
❑ There appear to be waters on the above described project area/property, that may be subject to Section 404 of the Clean Water
Act (CWA)(33 USC § 1344) and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) (33 USC § 403). However, since the waters
have not been properly delineated, this preliminary jurisdiction determination may not be used in the permit evaluation process.
Without a verified wetland delineation, this preliminary determination is merely an effective presumption of CWA/RHA
jurisdiction over all of the waters at the project area, which is not sufficiently accurate and reliable to support an enforceable
permit decision. We recommend that you have the waters on your project area/property delineated. As the Corps may not be able
to accomplish this wetland delineation in a timely manner, you may wish to obtain a consultant to conduct a delineation that can
be verified by the Corps.
B. Approved Determination
❑ There are Navigable Waters of the United States within the above described project area/property subject to the permit
requirements of Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) (33 USC § 403) and Section 404 of the Clean Water Act
(CWA)(33 USC § 1344). Unless there is a change in law or our published regulations, this determination may be relied upon for
a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
❑ There are waterson the above described project area/property subject to the permit requirements of Section 404 of the Clean
Water Act (CWA) (33 USC § 1344). Unless there is a change in the law or our published regulations, this determination may be
relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
❑ We recommend you have the waters on your project area/property delineated. As the Corps may not be able to accomplish
this wetland delineation in a timely manner, you may wish to obtain a consultant to conduct a delineation that can be verified by
the Corps.
❑ The waters on your project area/property have been delineated and the delineation has been verified by the Corps. The
approximate boundaries of these waters are shown on the enclosed delineation map dated DATE. We strongly suggest you have
this delineation surveyed. Upon completion, this survey should be reviewed and verified by the Corps. Once verified, this survey

SAW-2020-01813
will provide an accurate depiction of all areas subject to CWA jurisdiction on your property which, provided there is no change in
the law or our published regulations, may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years.
❑ The waters have been delineated and surveyed and are accurately depicted on the plat signed by the Corps Regulatory Official
identified below onDATE. Unless there is a change in the law or our published regulations, this determination may be relied
upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
❑ There are no waters of the U.S., to include wetlands, present on the above described project area/property which are subject to the
permit requirements of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC 1344). Unless there is a change in the law or our published
regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
❑ The property is located in one of the 20 Coastal Counties subject to regulation under the Coastal Area Management Act (LAMA).
You should contact the Division of Coastal Management in Morehead City, NC, at [phone] to determine their
requirements.
Placement of dredged or fill material within waters of the US, including wetlands, without a Department of the Army permit may
constitute a violation of Section 301 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC § 1311). Placement of dredged or fill material, construction or
placement of structures, or work within navigable waters of the United States without a Department of the Army permit may
constitute a violation of Sections 9 and/or 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act (33 USC § 401 and/or 403). If you have any questions
regarding this determination and/or the Corps regulatory program, please contact Krystynka B Stygar at 252-545-0507 or
krystynka.b.stygar(ii)usace. army.mil.
C. Basis For Determination: Basis For Determination: Based on the information submitted by the
applicant and available to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, the property exhibits criteria for waters
of the U.S. as defined in 33 CFR 328, the 1987 Wetland Delineation Manual, and/or the Regional
Supplement to the 1987 Manual: Eastern Piedmont and Mountains v2.0. See the preliminary
jurisdictional determination form dated 11/17/2020 included in the file.
D. Remarks: None.
E. Attention USDA Program Participants
This delineation/determination has been conducted to identify the limits of Corps' Clean Water Act jurisdiction for the particular site
identified in this request. The delineation/determination may not be valid for the wetland conservation provisions of the Food Security
Act of 1985. If you or your tenant are USDA Program participants, or anticipate participation in USDA programs, you should request
a certified wetland determination from the local office of the Natural Resources Conservation Service, prior to starting work.
F. Appeals Information (This information applies only to approved jurisdictional determinations as indicated in B.
above)
This correspondence constitutes an approved jurisdictional determination for the above described site. If you object to this
determination, you may request an administrative appeal under Corps regulations at 33 CFR Part 331. Enclosed you will find a
Notification of Appeal Process (NAP) fact sheet and request for appeal (RFA) form. If you request to appeal this determination you
must submit a completed RFA form to the following address:
US Army Corps of Engineers
South Atlantic Division
Attn: Phillip Shannin, Review Officer
60 Forsyth Street SW, Room 1OM15
Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8801
In order for an RFA to be accepted by the Corps, the Corps must determine that it is complete, that it meets the criteria for appeal
under 33 CFR part 331.5, and that it has been received by the Division Office within 60 days of the date of the NAP. Should you
decide to submit an RFA form, it must be received at the above address by Not applicable.
**It is not necessary to submit an RFA form to the pivision Office if you do not object to the determination in this correspondence.**
Corps Regulatory Official: / I�-,
Date of JD: 11/18/2020 Expiration Date of JD: Not applicable

SAW-2020-01813
The Wilmington District is committed to providing the highest level of support to the public. To help us ensure we
continue to do so, please complete the Customer Satisfaction Survey located at
http: //corpsmapu.usace .army.mil/cm_apex/f?p=13 6:4: 0
Copy furnished:
Agent: Wetlands and Environmental Planning Grout)
Dan Kuefler
Address: 10612-D Providence Road
Charlotte, NC 28277
Telephone Number: [phone]
E-mail: Daniel.kuefler(&wctlands-ct)g.com
Property Owner:
COMPANY NAME
John Logston
Address:
906 main street Suite 101
Wilkesboro, NC 28569
Telephone Number:
(336) 667-*2526
E-mail:
Unsdon()neecefirm.com

w
d' C
--I
0
p w —j
\ Q N
a
N Q Ln
() lj ♦
�r}fpi
F/--r-
ol
LL
00 D —i
m
'ram' �l'•f
j
' � �'�"�•..y�\.I� i/ rr lr� r� ! + f l '? ~ 'SJJ r f
0 J
I+ 4 +I �. ♦ 7 v' IIVVII��rr�v 1 }_ I �' Lu
� LL
/ f r _ �+ 1 i •� C
V� Z
! I C -"• M1 j a ! a
f f F r a- = '..- / r 1. t�rJ x, ^ O
1 W Zto C
�-
m z
CA F-
co
iow
LLI
01
QJ
Cr
Lij
Y
•
�- , _ � - �) - ,`�I� t f � �`��`�� '_ ,ter = �`-� � �, �A
� �
LU
4 r f
w�[` j ; � 15` ! f �� I if 1 I= i
o
v
W
W
4 4��
+
cc
r
Q
wiJ! I j r f % f f�� , . �` \,`, l 44+ LaU j (
II J �y ��r J J,,`�
'0
u �4' .! �'�i ' �'� - y~ ���—�'ti...-._rf j � 111 1 � �'Jf I S/s jj'ii•� _�_
N
.. a
O
f _
W
co ZZ
Qcri
LLJ
_ i i4 fl
`mo t p
l N N a^ w Uy
t _j 4
( Qa
0 +! 1 f Z O ' '_ F LLLLI t- -' j$ Lv
Q - Z -r
Ln
z a �n w_.__ O
z r' rJ o
?? o = w w -
Uj U Q ^
1. O_ - LAuj
y �L

a-J
L
O
Q
oC
r.
Threatened & Endangered Species
Report

Wetlands and Environmental Planning Group
Leonard S. Rindner, PLLC.
Threatened / Endangered / Protected Species
Evaluation
For: Turnersburg Highway
Statesville, Iredell County, North Carolina
By: Lisa R. Gaffney
Biologist
Field investigation conducted October 12, 2020 and October 4, 2021
Charlotte Office: www.wetiands-epg.com
Asheville Office:
10612-D Providence Rd.
1070 Tunnel Rd., Bldg. I
PMB 550
Suite 10, PMB 283
Charlotte, NC 28277
Asheville, NC 28805
[phone]
I en. ri nd ner@wet Ian ds -epg. co nn

Turnersburg Highway - Threatened /Endangered /Protected Species Evaluation
GENERAL LANDSCAPE DESCRIPTION:
The Turnersburg Highway site is located just north and west of James Farm
Road, and just east of Turnersburg Highway, in Statesville, Iredell County, North
Carolina. The (+/- 90 acre) site can be found on the Statesville West USGS
Topographic Quadrangle Map; latitude is 35.8275 ON, longitude is-80.8674 °W.
The topography is moderately sloped with the elevation ranging from 840 to 910
ft. The site is a primarily cropland with a small mixed pine/hardwood slope and
narrow stream buffer of a south flowing unnamed tributary to Fourth Creek.
(Figure 1).
Figure 1:
i11.
y r_�f
4 � �j r�lf �✓ 1 ;i� / ��
PROPERTY BOUNDARY
STUDY LIMITS i t ^� 1 I V �'tr Ta •
J, J:�
cli
r
j
-� FOURTH CREEK
?��
/ LOCATION / E
Lat: 35.8275 N SCALE �' ^ •� r i� r f �~
o * I Long:-80.8674 W 1:24,000 USGS QUAD i
a
N HUC: 03050101 ACRES Statesville W, NC 1 �}� ! s:
I UPPER CATAWBA +t 90.0 1993 v
0
-F�.rf.•' _.r� .. tJ% S»1�� '! : %J< � ,1� - 7 � :a i -� �t ��
Prepared for: TURNER513URG HWY Drawn By: Reviewed By: FIGURE 1
Iredell Co., NC
ELK
USGS MAP 08/25/20
For study purposes only -Subject verfj;c❑tion
Wetlands and Environmental Planning Group Leonard S. Rindner, PLLC

Turnersburg Highway - Threatened /Endangered /Protected Species Evaluation
METHODOLOGY:
The US Fish and Wildlife Service website
https://www.fws.gov/raleigh/species/cntylist/iredeI1.htmI was referenced to
determine the occurrence of Threatened, Endangered and Protected species for
Iredell County North Carolina, the results of which are listed below (Table 1).
Maps and aerial photographs were assembled, and the site was investigated
during the weeks of October 12, 2020 and October 4, 2021.
Table 1: Threatened / Endangered / Protected Species listed for
Iredell County North Carolina
County: Iredell, NC
*Source: US Fish & Wildlife Service
**Data search on October 12, 2020 ***updated October 4, 2021
Group Name Status
Vascular Plants Schweinitz's sunflower (Helianthus
schweinitzii)
Flowering Plants Dwarf -flowered heartleaf (Hexastylis
nanif/ora)
Reptiles Bog (=Muhlenberg) turtle (Clemmys
muhlenbergii)
Mammals Northern long-eared bat (Myotis
septentrionalis)
Birds Bald Eagle (Haliaeetus leucocephalus)
Vascular Plants
Threatened
Threatened
Threatened
Protected under the
Bald and Golden
Eagle Protection Act
Wetlands and Environmental Planning Group
3

Turnersburg Highway - Threatened /Endangered /Protected Species Evaluation
SPECIES DESCRIPTIONS:
Two plant species with federal protection are listed as potentially occurring in
Iredell County:
• Schweinitz's Sunflower (Helianthus schweinitzii), listed as Federally
Endangered, is typically found in open habitats which historically have
been maintained by wildfires and grazing bison and elk herds. Now most
occurrences are limited to roadsides, woodland and field edges, and utility
rights -of -way (ROW).
Dwarf -flowered Heartleaf (Hexastylis nanif/ora), listed as Threatened,
grows in acidic soils along bluffs and adjacent slopes, in boggy areas next
to streams and creek heads, and along the slopes of nearby hillsides and
ravines.
Three animal species with federal protection are listed as potentially occurring in
Iredell County:
Bog Turtle (Clemmys muhlenburgii), listed as Threatened, occurs in bogs,
fens, marshy meadows and other wetlands with emergent vegetation.
Northern Long-eared Bat (Myotis septentrionalis), listed as Federally
Threatened. During summer, northern long-eared bats roost singly or in
colonies underneath bark, in cavities, or in crevices of both live and dead
trees. Males and non -reproductive females may also roost in cooler
places, like caves and mines. It has also been found, rarely, roosting in
structures like barns and sheds. Northern long-eared bats spend winter
hibernating in caves and mines, called hibernacula.
Bald Eagle (Haliaeetus leucocephalus), protected by the Bald and Golden
Eagle Protection Act, typically inhabits forested areas near large bodies of
open water such as lakes, marshes, seacoasts and rivers, where there are
suitable fish populations and tall trees for nesting and roosting.
RESULTS:
The site is a primarily cropland with a small, disturbed mixed pine/hardwood
covered slope and narrow stream buffer of a south flowing unnamed tributary to
Fourth Creek.
Most of the site is covered with large crop fields. At the time of the surveys, it had
most recently been harvested for corn. The fields grade into a mowed turf grass
road shoulder and ditch under a small overhead power line along James Farm
Road.
WEPG#00786 4
Wetlands and Environmental Planning Group Leonard S. Rindner, PLLC.

Turnersburg Highway - Threatened /Endangered /Protected Species Evaluation
The small, wooded slope is covered with disturbed mixed pines and hardwoods.
Tree species occurring are Short -leaf Pine (Pinus echinata), White Ash (Fraxinus
americans), Sweetgum (Liquidambar styraciflua), Tulip Poplar (Liriodendron
tulipifera), White Oak (Quercus a/ba), Red Oak (Q. rubra), Mockernut Hickory
(Carya tomentosa), and Red Maple (Acerrubra). Subcanopy species include
Ironwood (Celtis laevigata), Flowering Dogwood (Corpus florida), Persimmon
(Diospyros virginiana), and American Holly (Ilex opaca). Dominant shrubs are
Russian Olive (E/aeagnus umbellate) and Chinese Privet (Ligustrum sinense).
Vines present are Japanese Honeysuckle (Lonicera japonica), Virginia Creeper
(Parthenocissus quinquefolia), Muscadine (Vitis rotundifolia), and Poison Ivy
(Toxicodendron radicans). Herbs present are Christmas Fern (Po/ystichum
acrostichoides), Ebony Spleenwort (Asplenium platyneuron), Spotted
Wintergreen (Chimaphila macu/ata), Downy Rattlesnake Plantain (Goodyera
pubescens) , Bedstraw (Galium sp.), and wetter areas are dominated by
Japanese Stiltgrass (Microstegium vimineum).
The narrow buffer of the unnamed tributary to Fourth Creek is highly disturbed
and the areas not cultivated are dominated by small trees of Green Ash
(Fraxinus pennsy/vanica), and other riparian species of Cottonwood (Popu/us
deltoides), Black Willow (Salix nigra), Sycamore (Platanus occidentalis), Tag
Alder (A/nus serru/ata), and Black Walnut (Jug/ans nigra).
Threatened / Endangered / Protected Species
• Potential habitat along field edges and roadsides were surveyed for
Schweinitz's Sunflower and the species was not observed. WEPG
concludes Schweinitz's Sunflower (Helianthus schweinitzii) does not occur
on the site.
• Due to disturbance from timbering and farming there is no suitable habitat
for Dwarf Flowered Heartleaf (Hexastylis nanif/ora) on site, and no plants
of the genus Hexastylis were observed. WEPG concludes Dwarf Flowered
Heartleaf (Hexastylis nanif/ora) does not occur on the site.
• Due to disturbance on site from past and present farming practices, there
is no suitable habitat for Bog Turtles (C/emmys muh/enbergii) on site, and
no bog Turtles were observed. WEPG concludes Bog Turtle (C/emmys
muh/enbergii) does not occur on the site.
• Comparing this site location to the USFWS Asheville office's website
(http-//www.fws.gov/asheville/htmis/project_review/NLEB_in_WNC.html)
WEPG concludes the site meets the "exempt" criteria which requires no
further action under section 7 of the Endangered Species Act for the
Northern Long-eared Bat.
WEPG#00786
Wetlands and Environmental Planning Group

Turnersburg Highway - Threatened /Endangered /Protected Species Evaluation
• There is no suitable habitat for bald eagles on the site. No birds or nests
were observed. WEPG concludes Bald Eagle (Haliaeetus leucoceohalus)
does not occur on the site.
RECOMMENDATIONS:
Based on the site investigation and the review of available data, WEPG did not
identify any protected species occurring on the subject property. No further
investigation of the presence of protected species on this site is recommended at
this time.
Respectfully submitted,
041XI # 1*e�l
Lisa R. Gaffney
Biologist
October 19, 2020
October 4, 2021
Wetlands and Environmental Planning Group Leonard S. Rindner, PLLC.

Turnersburg Highway - Threatened /Endangered /Protected Species Evaluation
Curriculum Vitae for:
Lisa R. Gaffney
Biologist / Botanist
B.S. Biology, University of North Carolina at Charlotte
Ms. Gaffney is a classically trained botanist and natural resource biologist and
has conducted field work and investigative studies covering thousands of
cumulative acres in both North and South Carolina since 1996, including:
• Discovered Schweinitz's Sunflower at Redlair Farm in Gaston County, NC.
which led to the purchase of the site by the State of North Carolina Plant
Conservation Program, now called Redlair Preserve. This population has
become a Recovery Site for the species.
• Located and identified numerous previously unreported populations of
Federally Endangered Schweinitz's Sunflower (Helianthus schweinitzii).
• Located and identified numerous previously unreported populations of
Threatened Dwarf Heartleaf (Hexastylis nanif/ora).
• Cabarrus County NC Natural Heritage Inventory. Organized, directed,
and conducted field survey of natural areas in Cabarrus County for the
North Carolina Natural Heritage Program.
• Lincoln County NC Natural Heritage Inventory. Organized, directed, and
conducted field survey of natural areas in Lincoln County for the North
Carolina Natural Heritage Program.
• Threatened and Endangered Species Surveys and Natural Communities
Evaluation for over 55,000 acres in North and South Carolina, 1996 -
present.
• Participated in numerous Piedmont Prairie restoration projects in both
North and South Carolina.
Wetlands and Environmental Planning Group
7
Leonard S. Rindner, PLLC.

a-J
L
O
Q
oC
u
O
V)
oC
c�
Cultural Resources
Report

R.S. Webb & Associates
Cultural Resource Management Consultants
2800 Holly Springs Parkway, Suite 200 • P.O. Drawer 1319
Holly Springs, Georgia 30142
Phone: [phone] • Fax: [phone]
November 11, 2021
Ms. Amber Lipsky
Leonard S. Rindner, PLLC
Wetlands & Environmental Planning Group
3714 Spokeshave Lane
Matthews, North Carolina 28105
Subject: Findings - Cultural Resources Literature Review
Sullivan Farm Development Tract
Statesville, Iredell County, North Carolina
R.S. Webb & Associates No. 21-678-030
Dear Ms. Lipsky:
BACKGROUND
During November 2021, R. S. Webb & Associates (RSWA) conducted a cultural resources literature
review for the Sullivan Farm development tract near Statesville, Iredell County, North Carolina. The
project area is located west of James Farm Road, northeast of the intersection of James Farm Road
(Route 2173) and Sullivan Road (U.S. Highway 21), in central Iredell County (Figure 1).
For this study, a cultural resource is defined as a discrete area of human activity that is at least 50
years old. Cultural resources include, but are not limited to, archeological sites, historic structures,
military earthworks, mines/mining features, historic cemeteries, and historic landscape features. The
purpose of the current study was to determine if previously recorded cultural resources are located
within the project area.
METHODOLOGY
Through the State Historic Preservation Office's (SHPO) HPOWEB database, information was
reviewed regarding National Register of Historic Places (NRHP) properties, Iredell County
surveyed -only historic resources, local landmarks, state study -list sites and historic resources
determined by the SHPO to be eligible for the NRHP. The North Carolina Office of State
Archaeology (OSA) provided RSWA with information via email regarding archeological sites within
1.0 kilometer (km) of the project area. This information included site forms, location maps and
partial or full reports. Historic county maps were examined online through North Carolina Maps,
a collaboration of the University of North Carolina, the State Archives of North Carolina, and the
Outer Banks History Center. Historic aerial photography and additional historic maps were accessed
through Historicaerials.com, Earthexplorer.usgs.gov, Legacy.lib.utexas.edu/maps/, and/or
Alabamamaps.ua. edu.
The following primary sources were found to be useful in searching for historic resources within and
adjacent to the project area:

Findings - Cultural Resources Literature Review, Sullivan Farm Tract, Iredell County, North Carolina Page 2
November 11, 2021
• 1891 Official Military Atlas of the Civil War (Davis et al. reprinted, 1983)
• 1893 USGS Statesville Sheet 30-minute quadrangle
• 1901 USDA Statesville Sheet Soil Map
• 1917 Kenney Map of Iredell County
• 1922 Post Office Department Map of Iredell County
• 1938 and 1968 State Highway and Public Works Commission Maps of Iredell County
• 1956, 1965, 1983 aerial photographs of Iredell County
• 1969 USGS Statesville East, NC 7.5-minute quadrangle
• 1969 USGS Statesville West, NC 7.5-minute quadrangle
• 1993 USGS Statesville East, NC 7.5-minute quadrangle
• 1985-2018 Google Earth aerial photography.
RESULTS
Previous Archeological Investigations: OSA records indicate no fewer than 10 potential previous
cultural resources investigation projects within 1.0 km of the study tract, three of which were within
500 m of the project area (CH-16-1637, ER 21-1464 and ER 21-1470; Figure 1). No reports of
survey findings for any of the nearby projects were provided by OSA. OSA personnel indicated via
follow-up e-mail communication that in 2016 the James Pointe Apartments project or project area,
including the entire current study tract, passed to OSA through North Carolina's State Clearinghouse
for intergovernmental review and it was designated by OSA as CH 16-1637 (Figure 1). Per OSA
personnel, the record for CH 16-1637 includes a letter of caution regarding a nearby cemetery at
Davidsonville Church and the effect of ground -disturbance activities near the cemetery; however,
there was no recommendation for a cultural resources survey of the study tract in the 2016
communication.
Previous Architecturallnvestigations: According to SHPO personnel, the North Carolina HPOWEB
database is the definitive source of all architectural survey information for Iredell County.
National Register of Historic Places: There are no NRHP-listed historic properties located within
1.0 km of the current study tract.
Iredell County Historic Resources: The HPOWEB database indicates no study -list sites, local
landmarks, surveyed -only historic resources, or properties determined eligible for the NRHP within
1.0 km of the study tract.
Recorded Archeological Sites: OSA archeological site records show one recorded archeological site
and two additional recognized historic and/or archeological features within 1.0 km of the project area
(Figure 1). Archeological site 38ID140, a prehistoric artifact scatter not assessed for NRHP-
eligibility, is located approximately 360 m southwest of the study tract. The two recognized features
are cemeteries located 200 m west (Davidsonville Church) and 600 m southwest (Fairview Church)
of the project area, but these cemeteries have not been assigned a state site number (Figure 1).
Revolutionary War Actions/Features: There was one reported Revolutionary War military
engagement in Iredell County at Tarrant's Tavern (February 1, 1781), located more than 30 m km
south of the study tract. The tavern served as a rendezvous point for numerous Patriot militia
companies that scattered in the wake of military actions to the south and southwest. On February

Findings - Cultural Resources Literature Review, Sullivan Farm Tract, Iredell County, North Carolina Page 3
November 11, 2021
2, gathering militia at this location were dispersed by attacking British cavalry and the tavern was
destroyed by British infantry as they marched northeast toward Salisbury (Lewis 2021).
Civil War Actions/Features: A review of The Official Military Atlas of the Civil War (Davis et al.
1983) indicates no major battles or campaign actions in Iredell County. Broad -scale maps of military
movements across the southeastern United States indicate cavalry operations in and around
Statesville during the March -April 1865 pursuit of Confederate President Jefferson Davis, who left
the railroad at Salisbury (38 km southeast) rather than continue on to Statesville. He fled southwest
overland via Charlotte and Yorkville, South Carolina to his eventually capture site in south Georgia
(Davis et al. 1983).
Historic Cemeteries: Reviewed USGS topographic maps show Davidsonville Church Cemetery
associated with Davidsonville Baptist Church, 200 m west of the project area (Figure 1). USGS
maps indicate Fairview Baptist Church approximately 600 m southwest of the project area, but no
mapped cemetery is associated with it. Google Earth aerials photography shows a cemetery present
about 110 m west of the main Fairview church building (Figure 1).
Structures on Historic Maps and Aerial Photographs: The 1893 and 1901 maps show Sullivan Road
passing west of the study tract, but the maps shows no secondary roads or individual buildings in or
near the study tract. The 1917 Kenney map depicts Sullivan Road and the "proposed Statesville Air
Line" railroad located west of the study tract. This map also shows a series of secondary roads to
the east, in or near the project area, that gave access to several tenant or owner residences; however,
the scale of this map is general and precise locations of these features and places could not be
determined. The 193 8 county highway map shows Sullivan Road, the intersection with Fort Dobbs
Road and a church east of the intersection (Davidsonville Baptist Church); this map shows no roads
to the east near the project area and buildings were limited to road corridors west of the study tract.
The aforementioned railroad corridor is not shown on the 193 8 highway map. The county highway
map dating to 1968 shows James Farm Road east and south of the project area with a 90 degree turn
or road intersection southeast of the study tract. All buildings except one were situated near road
corridors, west, south, and east of the study tract (Figure 1). The lone exception was a church
building symbol isolated (no access shown) within the south-central portion of the study tract (Figure
1). Evidence of this church was not observed on any of the other maps or aerials reviewed. The
1968 map depicts no railroad corridor west of the study tract.
The 1969 USGS topographic maps show Sullivan Road and James Farm Road with buildings located
west, south, and east of the study tract. This map shows: a section of an "Old Railroad Grade" along
the course of Statesville Airline railroad northwest of the study tract; Davidsonville Church and
Davidsonville Church Cemetery west of the study tract; a short outlet road southeast of the James
Farm Road intersection (now extended as Glenway Drive); and no buildings located in the project
area. Topographic maps revised in 1993 show an adjustment to the bend of eastern James Farm
Road and two additional buildings at or near the eastern study tract boundaries (Figure 1).
Aerial photographs from 1956 show all except the south-central section of the study tract in
cultivation. The north half of the study tract was sectioned into square and rectangular fields divided
by a series of field roads passing between James Farm Road (east) and a farmstead located west of
the creek that forms the western study tract boundary. A single barn was located at or near the
northwestern study tract boundary (Figure 1). A smaller area of cultivation in the southeastern part

Findings - Cultural Resources Literature Review, Sullivan Farm Tract, Iredell County, North Carolina Page 4
November 11, 2021
of the study tract was located along a road passing west from James Farm Road and a farmstead in
a study tract outparcel. Aerial photographs dating to 1965 show no change in the distribution of
buildings or land use in the project area; the road system was less extensive and open lands appeared
to be in pasture by 1965. Aerial photographs from 1983 indicate that only the section of road
between the farmstead to the west and the barn at the northwestern study tract boundary was active.
All open land was in pasture and a new house appeared north of James Farm Road near the southern
study tract boundary.
CONCLUSIONS
There are no NRHP-listed properties, determined -eligible properties, study -listed resources,
designated local landmarks, cemeteries, or recorded archeological sites located within the study tract.
OSA reviewed a tract of land encompassing the entire study tract in 2016 (CH 16-1637), but no
cultural resources survey appears to have been conducted for this tract. The closest known cultural
resource is historic Davidsonville Church Cemetery located approximately 200 m west of the study
tract. The closest recorded archeological resource is 38ID140, a prehistoric artifact scatter with an
unknown NRHP eligibility status located approximately 360 m southwest of the study tract. Review
of historic maps and aerials indicates extensive cultivation of the study tract through the middle 20'
century, apparently in associated with farm buildings east and west of the project area. A church
symbol is shown in the south-central part of the project tract only on the 1968 highway map;
however, there is no indication of its presence on other maps or aerial photographs.
CLOSING COMMENTS
Ms. Lipsky, we appreciate the opportunity to work with you on this project. If you have any
questions or comments, please contact me at 770-345-0706.
Sincerely,
R.S. WEBB ASSOCIATES
Robert S. (Steve) Webb
President and Senior Principal Archeologist
Attachments: Figure 1
REFERENCES
Davis, G.B., L. J. Perry and J. W. Kirkley, compiled by C. D. Cowles
1983 Atlas to Accompany the Official Records of the Union and Confederate Armies.
Reprint of the 1891-1895 edition. The Fairfax Press, New York.
Lewis, J.D.
2021 The American Revolution in North Carolina. Internet -Online. Found at:
http://www.carolana.comNC/Revolution/home.html. Accessed October 2021.

Lirie`Railroad t+ '
(Abandoneo)�
rr
1,
1 Project Area � '-
1 - : Church Symbol on
/ ' Davidsonville . 0 .,k �
�Baptist Church. Cr- �`
�� f �■ 1968 ay�Map
�� r � Highw
J and Cemetery' �- ■ - ; r • . ,.� ex
70
.Fort Dobbs_
Road = f 1 r �i..i... t.s• V F`.
■ j a
' Pro ect
L, �Pr j ct •• �: -
- CH 16'1637 Glenway 1 +
Drive
R Fairview c l gyp-
(Church ...�,�.�
5'J Cemetery
Fairview. ..I. fY.
r+Baptist i p James Farm
". Church �38ID140, `R`oad
Project
-
�_
A Structure on Historic Maps and Aerials — Project Tract Previously Previewed by State
■ Recorded Historic Resource --- Road on Historic Maps and Aerials
Recorded Archeological Site
Map Reference: 7.5-Minute USGS Quadrangles Scale
Statesville West (1993) and 0 610 meters
Statesville East (1993), NC
0 2000 feet
Figure 1 Project Area and Cultural Resources Location Map