Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutNC0020559_Wasteload Allocation_19911121NPDES DOCIMENT SCANNING COVER :MEET NC0020559 Henderson WWTP NPDES Permit: Document Type: Permit Issuance , Wasteload Allocation ) Authorization to Construct (AtC) Permit Modification Complete File - Historical Plan of Action Instream Assessment (67b) Environmental Assessment (EA) Permit History Document Date: November 21, 1991 Thin documeat printed on reuse paper - ignore any coateat on the rezrerse wide NPDES WAS I E LOAD ALLOCATION PERMIT NO.: NC0020559 PERMTITEE NAME: FACILITY NAME: City of Henderson Nutbush Creek WWTP Facility Status: Existing Permit Status: Modification Major Minor Pipe No.: 001 Design Capacity: 6,0 MGD #`f . /44 ►Vii-) (c-u,`sf s„5 Domestic (% of Flow): 94.5 % Industrial (% of Flow): 5.5 % Comments: Pretreatment information attached. Increasing to 6.0 MGD RECEIVING STREAM: Nutbush Creek Class: C Sub -Basin: 03-02-06 Reference USGS Quad: B 25 SW County: Vance Regional Office: Raleigh Regional Office (please attach) Previous Exp. Date: 8/31/94 Treatment Plant Class: Class IV Classification changes within three miles: Requested by: Rosanne Barona Date: 8/22/91 Prepared by:j, Reviewed by: ! ,( ac.r (./s wcz Date: /i// y q 1 Date: !1(w 4( Modeler Date Rec. # f A) Kbr3/o ! V(oo Drainage Area (mi2 ) g" Avg. Streamflow (cfs): •', S- 7Q10 (cfs) (2: Winter 7Q10 (cfs) Day 30Q2 (cfs) p Toxicity Limits: IWC % 7 % Acut r�on c 50 Instream Monitoring: Parameters1)ai pI-I, tem p/C.nr, Upstream Downstream z- s, s Effluent Characteristics s u,�,, �,,; (4. r (`: s `C s j t BOD5 (mg/1) (0 / Cadm►ur,,. d2 NH3-N (mg/1) 3 G(1.a 1,44.,.c.a— ,5Z) D.O. (mg/1) (P N: Lket 5 U TSS (mg/1) 30 j O LeeLcl .2s— F. Col. (/100 ml) a.bv .60 pH (SU) 6 _� -re( ii) /. v* /,S/` ��+, t. ) WLC:M �v'�Z maYv. -rc. p Lain Ei adC" D 1,) ri, Plat(! Secckli Ct. i Location N('_ gj Location �.t Ocwe,z (�( 0, M Mt _ Ct6C CGYA - �� `"�C" 7Crc- cJ Comments: C ec(;ve- '`l /i! q`/ 6,111bm - erri,rl, Coffer, Zinc , S�l��.- (yaya /A A-5 �_ I NPDES WASTE LOAD ALLOCATION PERMIT NO.: NC0020559 PERMITTEE NAME: City of Henderson FACILITY NAME: Nutbush Creek WWTP Facility Status: Existing Permit Status: Modification Major Minor Pipe No.: 001 Design Capacity: 6.0 MGD Domestic (% of Flow): 94.5 % Industrial (% of Flow): 5.5 % Comments: Pretreatment information attached. Increasing to 6.0 MGD RECEIVING STREAM: Nutbush Creek Class: C 6arrvl Yirrf Sub -Basin: 03-02-06 Reference USGS Quad: B 25 SW County: Vance (please attach) Regional Office: Raleigh Regional Office Previous Exp. Date: 8/31/94 Treatment Plant Class: Class IV Classification changes within three miles: Requested by: Rosanne Barona Date: 8/22/91 Prepared by: Date: / Reviewed by: i 5�, %�a Date: 11 Ze 7302),4 /a (a3. sc•) 1 f z( 4 Yates. •.9E- Modeler Date Rec. # � z !/•a 3 / 11 Co t%O(I Drainage Area (mil ) 3, Fr Avg. Slrreamflow (cfs): 3. 5� 7Q10 (cfs) d� Winter 7Q10 (cfs) o, e-/ 30Q2 (cfs) Toxicity Limits: IWC °I % Acut., " onic Instream Monitoring: .* Q-,,,,�e,;-� Parameters Doi ?H Cc t1 �c� t�e Q 5 � C c� �►� s Upstream ✓ Location N C 3 9 Downstream, z .5; s Location el ?c) wee 1 i%t `E�fluent Characteristics 5,�.�,,i,a. �,)„(1, ox i c5 � u � � 3 BOD5 (mg/1) S / a Cad.„:..rr. ,o NH3 N (mg/1) /. ? Ch o.iiiw.r 61 D.O. (mg/1) 7 '% m-Lke 1 10 TSS (mg/1) 3 0 3 D Lead a Co F. Col. (/100 ml) aoD c2fV Cyari:de S, 1 pH (SU) 6 -1 - ! f l€r r ell ---rp 6.751,) oe s 0 : 8°31 12- to-ra el.,- 6.N3 i) 1 7 1 i 0.49A, 5-1 I Comments: Mot. tlb,za coND I Copv 2 Kc , � tveg_ ii7; az3 non C!n torude s a. Facility Name: NPDES No.: Type of Waste: Facility Status: Permit Status: Receiving Stream: Stream Classification: Subbasin: County: Regional Office: Requestor: Date of Request: Topo Quad: FACT SHEET FOR WASTELOAD ALLOCATION Request # City of Henderson - Nutbush Creek WWTP NC0020559 94.5% Domestic / 5.5% Industrial Existing Modification Nutbush Creek (arm of Kerr Lake) C 03-02-06 Vance Raleigh Rosanne Barona 8/22/91 B25SW 6400 RECEIVED UUI 23 19` Raleigh Regional Office Stream Characteristic: USGS # 02.0792.6210 Date: 1988 Drainage Area (mi2): 3.8 Summer 7Q10 (cfs): 0.2 Winter 7Q10 (cfs): 0.4 Average Flow (cfs): 3.5 30Q2 (cfs): 0.5 IWC (%): ,_r98 Wasteload Allocation Summary (approach taken, correspondence with region, EPA, etc.) _ Proposed expansion from 4.14 MGD to 6.0 MGD. A speculative WLA was done in• P990. Limits are based on a QUAL2E modeling study and a nutrient survey of the Nutbush Creek of Kerr Lake. Stringent toxics limits are required due to a dilution of 1.02:1. The WWTP hasziifficulty passing its toxicity tests. There have been instream violations of metals limits and/or action levels. Instream nutrient levels are high with a strong potential for algal blooms; a TP limit of 0.5 mg/1 is required. TN limits may be required in the future. Special Schedule Requirements and additional comments from Reviewers: Recommended by: Date: /4/0/ Reviewed by Instream Assessment: IILW - S 40(1, Date: -X-- Regional Supervisor: ...0 ,z, Date: ////J/S/ Permits & Engineering: P,,,,.? Date: OM (O(IS(RI NOV 2 0 'i3'.� I RETURN TO TECHNICAL SERVICES BY: 6.44 5e5 ; n 5-1-VearY1 inDn: ionn lk);`1-i/1ohs W;+GI ctve i n aCCavdone - 2 CONVENTIONAL PARAMETERS Existing Limits: Wasteflow (MGD): BOD5 (mg/1): NH3N (mg/1): DO (mg/1): TSS (mg/1): Fecal Col. (/100 ml): pH (SU): Residual Chlorine (µg/1): Oil & Grease (mg/1): TP (mg/1): 1* 1.5* TN (mg/l): monitor monitor * TP limit effective April 1, 1994 Recommended Limits: Wasteflow (MGD): BOD5 (mg/1): NH3N (mg/1): DO (mg/1): TSS (mg/1): Fecal Col. (/100 ml): pH (SU): Residual Chlorine (µg/1): Oil & Grease (mg/1): TP (mg/1): TN (mg/1): * TP limit effective April Monthly Average Summer Winter 4.14 4.14 6 12 3 6 6 6 30 30 200 200 6-9 6-9 monitor monitor Monthly Average Summer Winter 4.14 4.14 6 12 3 6 6 6 30 30 200 200 6-9 6-9 monitor monitor 1* 1.5* monitor monitor 1,1994 Summer 6.0 5 1 7 30 200 6-9 17 0.5 monitor Winter 6.0 10 1.9 7 30 200 6-9 17 0.5 monitor Limits Changes Due To: Parameter(s) Affected Change in 7Q10 data Change in stream classification Relocation of discharge Change in wasteflow X BOD5, NH3-N, DO Other (onsite toxicity study, interaction, etc.) Instream data New regulations/standards/procedures New facility information (explanation of any modifications to past modeling analysis including new flows, rates, field data, interacting discharges) (See page 4 for miscellaneous and special conditions, if applicable) 3 Type of Toxicity Test: Existing Limit: Recommended Limit: Monitoring Schedule: Existing Limits Conductivity: Cadmium (ug/1): Chromium (ug/1): Copper (ug/1): Nickel (ug/1): Lead (ug/1): Zinc (ug/1): Cyanide (ug/1): Arsenic (ug/1): Mercury (ug/1): Silver (ug/1): VI1343 090 Recommended Limits TOXICS/METALS Chronic ceriodaphnia, Quarterly 97 9. MAR, JUN, SEP, DEC Daily Conductivity: Cadmium (ug/1): Chromium (ug/1): Copper (ug/l): Nickel (ug/1): Lead (ug/1): Zinc (ug/1): Cyanide (ug/1): Arsenic (ug/1): Mercury (ug/1): Silver (ug/1): Diazinon (ug/1): Fluoride (ug/1): Chlorides (mg/1): 04-9Pc s L eg t c ) Limits Changes Due To: Change in 7Q10 data Change in stream classification Relocation of discharge Change in wasteflow New pretreatment information Failing toxicity test Other (onsite toxicity study, interaction, etc.) Daily Max. monitor 2 50 monitor 50 25 monitor monitor monitor Y4to h.�� Max. 4.14 MGD monitor 2 50 monitor 50 25 monitor monitor monitor W10r►�'T� r 6.0 MGD6) or EL monitor 2 51 monitor 90 26 monitor 5.1 monitor 0.012 monitor monitor 1839 monitor srt Parameter(s) Affected X Parameter(s) are water quality limited. For some parameters, the available load capacity of the immediate receiving water will be consumed. This may affect future water quality based effluent limitations for additional dischargers within this portion of the watershed. 4 INSTREAM MONITORING REQUIREMENTS Upstream Location: NC 39 Downstream Location: 1)at power lines 2) immediately above the confluence of Indian & Crooked ( Parameters: Temp, DO, Cond, pH, Fecal Coliform Special instream monitoring locations or monitoring frequencies: .x- see attachment (schedule applies to both wasteflows) MISCELLANEOUS INFORMATION & SPECIAL CONDITIONS Adequacy of Existing Treatment Has the facility demonstrated the ability to meet the proposed new limits with existing treatment facilities? Yes No X If no, which parameters cannot be met? metals, Would a "phasing in" of the new limits be appropriate? Yes No X If yes, please provide a schedule (and basis for that schedule) with the regional office recommendations: If no, why not? The limits should be met upon expansion which will require a plant upgrade. Special Instructions or Conditions Wasteload sent to EPA? (Major) _Y (Y or N) (If yes, then attach schematic, toxics spreadsheet, copy of model, or, if not modeled, then old assumptions that were made, and description of how it fits into basinwide plan) Additional Information attached? Y (Y or N) If yes, explain with attachments. Schematic Pretreatment Spreadsheet Self -Monitoring Requirements Summer (April - October): DO pH Temp Fecal Coliform Conductivity Secchi Depth Chlorophyll a Total Phosphorus NH3-N TKN NO2-NO3 Frequency/Type a. weekly t/grab b. monthly/profile a. weekly f/grab b. monthly/profile a. weekly #/grab b. monthly/profile We ek y 1/grab Weekly #/grab Winter (November - March): DO pH Temp Fecal Coliform Conductivity monthly/composite monthly/composite monthly/composite monthly/composite monthly/composite monthly/composite Frequency/Type a. mont my/grab a. •• - • .• /grab Wee /grab • / ab t„Jeeicty monthly/grab week \ . monthly/grab Location U,D1,D2 D1,D2 U,D1,D2 D1,D2 U,D1,D2 D 1,D2 U,D1 ) 1>z U,D1) D� D1,D2 D1,D2 D1,D2 D1,D2 D1,D2 D1,D2 Location U,D 1,D2 U,D 1,D2 U,D1,D2 U,D1) - U,D1) D�.. Profiles should be taken at 1 meter intervals. Composites should be taken with a lab line in the photic zone, Samples should be taken mid -morning. Rainfall data shall be the seven consecutive days prior to the day of sampling. Sampling Locations: Nutbush Creek at, U: D1: D2: i.e., 2 x secchi depth. reported for NC 39 at power lines immediately above the confluence of Indian and Crooked Creeks /7Gtders z 4/114d1P Nv/ s-k ee 1 f • 7 -a Q 1317 • Facility Name at/ r1eha€1S0r`. (tXdtl-> Permit # O551 Pipe # 00 CHRONIC TOXICITY PASS/FAIL PERMIT LIMIT (QRTRLY) The effluent discharge shall at no time exhibit chronic toxicity using test procedures outlined in: 1.) The North Carolina Ceriodaphnia chronic effluent bioassay procedure (North Carolina Chronic Bioassay Procedure - Revised *September 1989) or subsequent versions. The effluent concentration at which there may be no observable inhibition of reproduction or significant mortality is °l D % (defined as treatment two in the North Carolina procedure document). The permit holder shall perform quarterly monitoring using this procedure to establish compliance with the permit condition. The first test will be performed after thirty days from the effective date of this permit during the months of Mg J oN 56-P c . Effluent sampling for this testing shall be performed at the NPDES permitted final effluent discharge below all treatment processes. All toxicity testing results required as part of this permit condition will be entered on the Effluent Discharge Monitoring Form (MR-1) for the month in which it was performed, using the parameter code TGP3B. Additionally, DEM Form AT-1 (original) is to be sent to the following address: Attention: Environmental Sciences Branch North Carolina Division of Environmental Management 4401 Reedy Creek Road Raleigh, N.C. 27607 Test data shall be complete and accurate and include all supporting chemical/physical measurements performed in association with the toxicity tests, as well as all dose/response data. Total residual chlorine of the effluent toxicity sample must be measured and reported if chlorine is employed for disinfection of the waste stream. Should any single quarterly monitoring indicate a failure to meet specified limits, then monthly monitoring will begin immediately until such time that a single test is passed. Upon passing, this monthly test requirement will revert to quarterly in the months specified above. Should any test data from this monitoring requirement or tests performed by the North Carolina Division of Environmental Management indicate potential impacts to the receiving stream, this permit may be re -opened and modified to include alternate monitoring requirements or limits. NOTE: Failure to achieve test conditions as specified in the cited document, such as minimum control organism survival and appropriate environmental controls, shall constitute an invalid test and will require immediate retesting(within 30 days of initial monitoring event). Failure to submit suitable test results will constitute noncompliance with monitoring requirements. 7Q10 cfs Permitted Flow Li . I y MGD IWC Basin & Sub -basin 03 — — 0 C� Receiving Stream 4i Sus k, County Va.vIc+2 Recommended by: QCL PIF Version 9/91 Facility Name l.t ice' Permit # 65 S9 Pipec d�. # CHRONIC TOXICITY PASS/FAIL PERMIT LIMIT (QRTRLY) The effluent discharge shall at no time exhibit chronic toxicity using test procedures outlined in: 1.) The North Carolina Ceriodaphnia chronic effluent bioassay procedure (North Carolina Chronic Bioassay Procedure - Revised *September 1989) or subsequent versions. The effluent concentration at which there may be no observable inhibition of reproduction or significant mortality is lb % (defined as treatment two in the North Carolina procedure document). The permit holder shall perform quarterly monitoring using this procedure to establish compliance with the permit condition. The first test will be performed after thirty days from the effective date of this permit during the months of MO- J'J N4 ISP .1)(, . Effluent sampling for this testing shall be performed at the NPDES permitted final effluent discharge below all treatment processes. All toxicity testing results required as part of this permit condition will be entered on the Effluent Discharge Monitoring Form (MR-1) for the month in which it was performed, using the parameter code TGP3B. Additionally, DEM Form AT-1 (original) is to be sent to the following address: Attention: Environmental Sciences Branch North Carolina Division of Environmental Management 4401 Reedy Creek Road Raleigh, N.C. 27607 Test data shall be complete and accurate and include all supporting chemical/physical measurements performed in association with the toxicity tests, as well as all dose/response data. Total residual chlorine of the effluent toxicity sample must be measured and reported if chlorine is employed for disinfection of the waste stream. Should any single quarterly monitoring indicate a failure to meet specified limits, then monthly monitoring will begin immediately until such time that a single test is passed. Upon passing, this monthly test requirement will revert to quarterly in the months specified above. Should any test data from this monitoring requirement or tests performed by the North Carolina Division of Environmental Management indicate potential impacts to the receiving stream, this permit may be re -opened and modified to include alternate monitoring requirements or limits. NOTE: Failure to achieve test conditions as specified in the cited document, such as minimum control organism survival and appropriate environmental controls, shall constitute an invalid test and will require immediate retesting(wit in 30 days of initial monitoring event). Failure to submit suitable test results will constitute noncompliance with monitoring requirements. 7Q10 0• a cfs 'Permitted Flow . D MGD IWC �$ % Basin & Sub -basin 03 - a O h Receiving Stream Nin6iish. i'regk County Vance Recommended by: QCL PIF Version 9191 Henderson WWTP - Nutbush Creek Self -Monitoring Requirements — .6r b o+1,_ 4/. Iy a r2I G, o P96 i) Summer (April - October): Frequency/Type Location DO a. weekly/grab U,D1,D2 b. monthly/profile D1,D2 pH a. weekly/grab U,D1,D2 b. monthly/profile D1,D2 Temp a. weekly /grab U,D 1,D2 b. monthly/profile D1,D2 Fecal Coliform weekly/grab U,D 1,D2 Conductivity weekly/grab U,D 1,D2 Secchi Depth monthly/eenvesite D1,D2 Chlorophyll a monthly/composite D 1,D2 Total Phosphorus monthly/composite D 1,D2 NH3-N monthly/composite D1,D2 TKN monthly/composite D 1,D2 NO2-NO3 monthly/composite D 1,D2 Winter (November - March): Frequency/Type Location DO a. weekly/grab U,D1,D2 pH a. weekly/grab U,D1,D2 Temp a. weekly/grab U,D 1,D2 Fecal Coliform weekly/grab U,D 1,D2 Conductivity weekly/grab U,D 1,D2 Profiles should be taken at 1 meter intervals. Composites should be taken with a lab line in the photic zone, i.e., 2 x secchi depth. Samples should be taken mid -morning. Rainfall data shall be reported for the seven consecutive days prior to the day of sampling. Sampling Locations: Nutbush Creek at, U: NC 39 D 1: at power lines D2: immediately above the confluence of Indian and Crooked Creeks 09/16/91 ver 3.1 T OXICS REVIEW Facility: NPDES Permit No.: Status (E, P, or M): HENDERSON NC0020559 M Permitted Flow: / `4_1 j mgd Actual Average Flow: 2.0 mgd Subbasin: '030206 Receiving Stream: NUTBUSH CREEK I PRETREATMENT DATA I----EFLLUENT DATA ---- Stream Classification: C I ACTUAL PERMITTEDI 7Q10: 0.2 cfs 1 Ind. + Ind. + 1 FREQUENCY IWC: 96.98 % I Domestic PERMITTED Domestic 1 OBSERVED of Chronic Stn'd / Bkg 1 Removal Domestic Act.Ind. Total Industrial Total I Eflluent Criteria Pollutant AL Conc. 1 Eff. Load Load Load Load Load I Conc. Violations (ug/1) (ug/1) 1 % (#/d) (#/d) (#/d) (#/d) (#/d) 1 (ug/1) (#vio/#sam) Cadmium S 2.0 1 44% 0.1 0.0 0.07 0.0 0.090 1 5.0 1 Chromium S 50.0 1 60% 0.4 0.4 0.73 0.6 0.900 1 29.0 I I Copper AL 7.0 1 77% 0.7 0.1 0.78 0.2 0.910 1 63.0 1 N Nickel S 88.0 1 32% 0.5 0.0 0.55 0.2 0.750 1 41.0 1 P Lead S 25.0 1 65% 0.2 0.0 0.19 0.4 0.620 1 14.0 1 U Zinc AL 50.0 1 81% 2.3 0.2 2.45 0.4 2.720 1 34.0 1 T Cyanide S 5.0 1 59% 0.7 0.0 0.70 0.0 0.700 1 26.0 Mercury S 0.012 1 86% 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.0 0.010 1 1 S Silver AL 0.06 1 94% 0.2 0.0 0.18 0.0 0.180 1 1 E Selenium S 5.00 1 90% 1 1 C Arsenic S 50.00 1 40% 0.1 0.0 0.05 0.0 0.050 1 1 T Phenols S NA 1 71% 0.4 0.1 0.40 0.1 0.440 1 1 I NH3-N C 1 0% 1 1 0 T.R.Chlor.AL 17.0 1 0% 1 1 N ALLOWABLE PRDCT'D PRDCT'D PRDCT'D MONITOR/LIMIT I--ADTN'L RECMMDTN'S-- Effluent Effluent Effluent Instream 1 Recomm'd Conc. using using Conc. Based on Based on Based on 1 FREQUENCY INSTREAM Allowable CHRONIC ACTUAL PERMIT using ACTUAL PERMITTED OBSERVED 1 Eff. Mon. Monitor. Pollutant 1 Load Criteria Influent Influent OBSERVED Influent Influent Effluent 1 based on Recomm'd ? (#/d) (ug/l) (ug/1) (ug/1) (ug/1) Loading Loading Data 1 OBSERVED (YES/NO) Cadmium S I 0.06 2.062 2.370 2.975 4.85 Limit Limit Limit 1 NCAC YES 1 A Chromium S I 2.25 51.558 17.315 21.251 28.12 Limit Limit Limit 1 NCAC NO 1 N Copper AL I 0.55 7.218 10.597 12.355 61.10 Monitor Monitor Monitor 1 Weekly YES 1 A Nickel S 1 2.33 90.743 21.933 30.106 39.76 Limit Limit Limit 1 NCAC NO 1 L Lead S I 1.29 25.779 4.019 12.810 13.58 Limit Limit Limit 1 NCAC NO 1 Y Zinc AL 1 4.74 51.558 27.491 30.507 32.97 Monitor Monitor Monitor 1 Monthly NO 1 S Cyanide 5 1 0.22 5.156 16.942 16.942 25.21 Limit Limit Limit 1 NCAC YES 1 I Mercury S 1 0.00 0.012 0.000 0.083 0.00 Limit 1 1 S Silver AL 1 0.02 0.062 0.638 0.638 0.00 Monitor Monitor 1 I Selenium S 1 0.90 5.156 0.000 0.000 0.00 1 1 R Arsenic S 1 1.50 51.558 1.771 1.771 0.00 Monitor Monitor I 1 E Phenols S 1 0.000 6.878 7.532 0.00 Limit Limit 1 1 S NH3-N C 1 0.000 0.00 I 1 U T.R.Chlor.AL 1 17.530 0.00 Limit 1 1 L I I I T I I I S I 08/27/91 ver 3.1 T OXICS REVIEW Facility: NPDES Permit No.: Status (E, P, or M) : Permitted Flow: 6.0 mgd Actual Average Flow: 2.0 mgd Subbasin: '030206 Receiving Stream: NUTBUSH CREEK I PRETREATMENT DATA I----EFLLUENT DATA ---- Stream Classification: C I ACTUAL PERMITTED! 7Q10: 0.2 cfs I Ind. + Ind. + 1 FREQUENCY IWC: 97.89 % I Domestic PERMITTED Domestic 1 OBSERVED of Chronic Stn'd / Bkg 1 Removal Domestic Act.Ind. Total Industrial Total 1 Eflluent Criteria Pollutant AL Conc. 1 Eff. Load Load Load Load Load 1 Conc. Violations (ug/1) (ug/1) 1 % (#/d) (#/d) (#/d) (#/d) (#/d) 1 (ug/1) (#vio/#sam) HENDERSON NC0020559 M Cadmium S 2.0 1 44% 0.1 0.0 0.07 0.0 0.090 1 ( 5.02 >Z Chromium S 50.0 1 60% 0.4 0.4 0.73 0.6 0.900 1 29.0 1 I Copper AL 7.0 I 77% 0.7 0.1 0.78 0.2 0.910 1 63i -01 N Nickel S 88.0 1 32% 0.5 0.0 0.55 0.2 0.750 1 41.0 1 P Lead S 25.0 1 65% 0.2 0.0 0.19 0.4 0.620 1 14.0 1 U Zinc AL 50.0 1 81% 2.3 0.2 2.45 0.4 2.720 1 34.0 I T Cyanide S 5.0 1 59% 0.7 0.0 0.70 0.0 0.700 1 `26.d y 5.1 Mercury S 0.012 1 86% 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.0 0.010 1 1 S Silver AL 0.06 1 94% 0.2 0.0 0.18 0.0 0.180 I I E Selenium S 5.00 1 90% 1 1 C Arsenic S 50.00 I 40% 0.1 0.0 0.05 0.0 0.050 1 1 T Phenols S NA 1 71% 0.4 0.1 0.40 0.1 0.440 1 1 I NH3-N C 1 0% 1 1 0 T.R.Chior.AL 17.0 1 0% 1 1 N Pollutant ALLOWABLE PRDCT'D PRDCT'D PRDCT'D MONITOR/LIMIT I--ADTN'L RECMMDTN'S-- Effluent Effluent Effluent Instream 1 Recomm'd Conc. using using Conc. Based on Based on Based on 1 FREQUENCY INSTREAM Allowable CHRONIC ACTUAL PERMIT using ACTUAL PERMITTED OBSERVED 1 Eff. Mon. Monitor. Load Criteria Influent Influent OBSERVED Influent Influent Effluent 1 based on Recomm'd ? (#/d) (ug/1) (ug/1) (ug/1) (ug/1) Loading Loading Data 1 OBSERVED (YES/NO) Cadmium S 1 0.06 2.043 2.370 2.975 4.89 Limit Limit Limit I NCAC YES 1 A Chromium S 1 2.25 51.075 17.315 21.251 28.39 Limit Limit Limit 1 NCAC NO 1 N Copper AL 1 0.55 7.151 10.597 12.355 61.67 Monitor Monitor Monitor I Weekly YES 1 A Nickel S 1 2.33 89.892 21.933 30.106 40.14 Limit Limit Limit 1 NCAC NO 1 L Lead S 1 1.29 25.538 4.019 12.810 13.71 Limit Limit Limit 1 NCAC NO 1 Y Zinc AL 1 4.74 51.075 27.491 30.507 33.28 Monitor Monitor Monitor I Monthly NO 1 S Cyanide S 1 0.22 5.108 16.942 16.942 25.45 Limit Limit Limit I NCAC YES 1 1 Mercury S 1 0.00 0.012 0.000 0.083 0.00 Limit 1 1 S Silver AL 1 0.02 0.061 0.638 0.638 0.00 Monitor Monitor 1 I Sn S 1 0.90 p f- ' 58 0.000 0.000 0.00 1 1 R Arsenic S I 1.50 51.075 1.771 1.771 0.00 Monitor Monitor 1 1 E Phenols S 1 0.000 6.878 7.532 0.00 Limit Limit 1 1 S NH3-N C 1 0.000 0.00 1 1 U T.R.Chlor.AL 1 17.366 0.00 Limit 1 1 L I I T I I I s NA -bus r Cre.e. L:::Xcs7)N6 4-/ml7S Was lc,,) ..: LI.1`i fad —Csso Do / 3 Ca .r,•/r ` ao o /, oc 1--21 - Jc_II P6 Cd- Cortd as uJc�� ua l l A-5, 2n, C. , M3AS Sc�clh, CLS. a• , 1J a s C91 CT� )C eT., n' . ( 1 07.0192.4,2t0 `scg 7Qlos az cc-5 O3 -o 2 -6 RCo M✓►/EN-J.> ID c UK7.7S Wastr$lo( (o . O M6t 13o-0s- 6 l l c mod! N‘13-i I / 1,9 nit Ts5 3D w��1i -Dv 7 045/ 1 ''e rAJ a 0 0 P 00 m� Cr I C IJ S. l „51 t ccJ C',V 17 v51 ,J, 90 1^43irs 5I/ .)5// Ago 6t l-.r : Cu., �' , 43, As l Q ' c. 5 MG l TN iox,ci +y - Caw« , c umer , �18 + 5.lreou.. 14.0n.rcn� �Lcun 7QI0,,,, ` o. y c 3ock=0.scfs Sfec�14 ue_ LOLA 7/100 - Leaer + Her,d�rsc` 7/i / 9 0 • l 130 ►�S a— a,Mona o-bx;<;a-y —06 7 . roxics Pre f reed -meat- t-LMIT 1094)E, fro) R caeGL• nSf2. C miK,� a *.7COeeQ-r key c►ar,,;..w-- 51 — m6-A&Y jv�z ke ( cG Si Lem - �,cAc Lea.A a — N CJ C Cy a,;de 5.1 Gn6.;.l e 17 I= obs > aUowctble v1 a 12 G,1s p,-ect� cif 1_c2Is l APA std Cw Ztv.c Zo ALso 6„,,,41.-6L 51 ,1 Chtza;k 55,aoo `k11.-3o,ry►k 1^ , 3 3,ijctc{(s' quoYC.Ae. 9 t Soo lIth',k 183`.i m;sc 0i9s ,s}ci ' ea) rA6AS c30 (i.3i), .5 e Sri 10x, c (-y — -%s-t; 45 -3- I ct 3.1c j - err - r PT 1/442xe. i'ir t c� (j.S .Me I 1 recowicr‘u•s,d.¢d Tim 5 s cytnc� Io j I 4- 6 • Z � I I , a.doc o meet `,r�s1+Po�r►� �arc�f C�,�Ca .�va�i ar o� SZ� v51 co 40r _ TNI�� ivt \S 1MQy ��. '�.L.t..tc'2G �. "-aTe .. I si CJ -v— V1AD:LL��'�Y1 C� -tom mite vvit vais Ll �CW,ts}vectrw .x NL_ ct,ba✓e c:,.i-clime ice 1�/LG�`Kw Z Cry 0kacl 1.4-•-1 SK�L • - „t k � K1 W<.ttZ. — ww [y itie /°x7/1 a. _ v olds a y/( sk,e(A 77? Ire"- ,deee,..41-e-ei Gvw71 AL. irocle APels 4,--e a so 42.44Cer Ue .6v e-� — /.S viol .s , rr_u./s 77M dazCs//Qleris ed << <1 b 7v n) 61,0.,s` rey bakA. va 1.G( S - Q 42.4 jP ate, 1 -/�- te6 .J l G‘. ' V tetO _ Cc,nb1C,L_h471/V, v cz. r-5-, Sect or &D Zegtag are / ` 3 << Gike _ -_eAl `l- - _a FIGURE T, ISLAND CREEK RESERVOIR WATER ELEV. 260 co ,St Tungslon .0' 1339 1338 119. Hicks Crossr a s 1303 N .. _ u (^!13 Dc:,ney 7 .4 ncro eP 1.3 h Harris Crossroads Run CR 1 132i 1 t • MECKLENBURG CO. HENDERSON _ POP.13.522 125Z. 1 ' 1.4 / A . LL 1 ii> L{98. 119 �T} Gam] N. ilENDERSON wJ • (UNINC.) POP.1,832 i+OY. a 1 '• • 1364 Drcwri 1.3 1 . �* 1373` :-a. r \ 1563 p 1507 Brookston 15 )• � t '•. .a 1 . fA5 1501 Rai• 151 1517 1607 1.5 1313 DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT December 7, 1990 MEMORANDUM TO: Alan Clark p�� THROUGH: Trevor Clement +\ FROM: Ruth Swanek-, \l SUBJECT: City of Henderson 201 Plan Review Nutbush Creek WWTP (030206) NPDES No. NC0020559 Vance County I have reviewed the 201 plan for the City of Henderson's pro- posed expansion to 6 MGD and offer the following comments: 1. On page VI-B-7, the report states that the winter cadmium limit is 0.005 mg/1. This should be changed to 0.002 mg/1. 2. The report lists the speculative chemical specific toxics limits provided to the City. However, it only addresses how the facility will comply with its chlorine limit. The report should include information on whether the metals limits can be achieved through the current pretreatment program or if it must be modified. In addition, the report omits the speculative chronic toxicity limit (Ceriodaphnia at 98%) . The remainder of the 201 plan looks reasonable to Technical Support. If you have any questions or comments, please contact me at extension 507.