NC0004308_Wasteload Allocation_19800715

NPDES DOCUMENT SCANNIN. COVER SHEET
NC0004308
ALCOA — Badin Works
NPDES Permit:
Document Type:
Permit Issuance
Wasteload Allocation
Authorization to Construct (AtC)
Permit Modification
Complete File - Historical
Correspondence
Instream Assessment (67b)
Environmental Assessment (EA)
Permit
History
Document Date:
July 15, 1980
This document is printed on reuse paper -ignore any
content on the reYerse side

MEMORANDUM
TO:
North Carolina Department of Natural
Resources &Community Development
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor Howard N. Lee, Secretary
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
July 15, 1980
Dave Adkins
Mooresville Regional Office
r ,
Jennifer Buzun, Environmental Engineer '
Technical Services Branch
THRU: Forrest Westall, Head
Technical Services Branch
SUBJECT: BOD5 and D.O. Limits for Discharge Pipe 11003 -
Alcoa, Permit No. NC0004308
The BPT limits for Subpart B of Non -Ferrous Metals Manufacture (Primary
Aluminum Smelting) do not include any BOD limits. However, the original
permit for this discharge pipe limited BOD5 as follows:
Daily Avg. = 58 lbs. 30 mg/1
Daily Max. = 86 lbs. = 45 mg/1
for a daily average flow of 0.23 MGD and a daily maximum flow of 0.45 MGD.
Dissolved oxygen in the effluent was not limited.
We do not know the rationale under which the original BOD5 limits were
given; however, monitoring records show a significant amount of BOD5
in the effluent for pipe 4#003. Taking into account the cooling waters
from pipes 004 and 005, a water quality analysis for a design flow of
0.18 MGD (for pipe 003) yields limits of BOD5 = 101 mg/1 = 152 lbs/day
and D.O. = 0 mg/1 (no D.O. limit). These are less stringent than the
original limitations. However, we feel that the original limits should
be maintained since the monitoring records show the treatment facility
has been achieving these limits.
P. O. Box 27687 Raleigh, North Carolina 27611
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer

NPDES WASTE LOAD ALLOCATION
Routing on Reverse Side
Facility Name: Reo4'
County: 5'7']C
Receiving Stream: G; - /%,„,74,, (i t•. /c'
Date: li//,�?
Permit No.: / / &,?Ol.) 1i O8 Pipe No.: 1)03
Class :
Design Capacity (1 D): n.180 Design Temp.: Requestor: 4v /,/ yy,/es
Sub -basin: OS-0'7-O8 Drainage Area: 7Q,1.0: ; ; ,
Class:
Limits ts (circle one) : Effluent or Water Quality Avg. Stream Flow: DO Sag Pt. (mi. )
C*57// 4 /4m,,in/..--%Af,;-„ L✓ ., Za
Other Stream Affected:
�. -
Effluent
1
, Month]y, Avery
.,
, Weekly Average
Max. INly Avg,
Max
mum
Minimum
Conc.
_
Load,
Characteristics
Conc.
Load.
Conc,
Load,
Conc. i Load.
Conc.
Load.
BOD5
s� E
cN ,\ r o cI
n
Fccel Col.iferm
Disolved Oxygen
sL
i't sc�-, <�
h
_
_
Total SS
, 1 o6c),
11<az:, �?j
l 00 ,
_
)J,-)._. 4 —
gP1"
1s0, � r
`
I ---N
pH (range)
(o -?
SA),
-
6P1
.,,
2.Wa l.,
16 r'll
i 1 I
1 5 rA.'
3/ i
1.b/rt›u
,
u.).,--i-f-J
1,---1
-2-17,-,4
tup.x.4
j _i 1
OTTED
P
..
,
Prepared by:
nn
. %0 Reviewed by:
Date: rl/ 11 Jew
IS -3/78

For Industrial Dischargers List BPT Below
ovAs 17.- r I oc>U our,as
Effluent
Monthly Average
Weekly Averaged
v e_ • _
Maxi=
Minimum
Characteristics
Conc.
Load.
Conc.
Load.
Conc.
Load.
Conc.
Load.
Conc.
Load.
GODS
Fecal Coliform
_
Disolved Oxygen
_
_
Total SS
�• 5 I b�
,
_
3, o I �sl.
NH3
_
_
_
pH (range)
9,
_
_
fluor -lc -LC-
I, U th;
._a_ UK;
_
_ ._
,
_
,
_
1
_
Industrial SIC Code: J'33 ;/
Effluent Guideline Reference: Sib
`i00, ooc,
me,w!
Type of Waste: GUCJ '/.�.�c- l�c,y�c.. ���t.,.�nz<-w c;�.✓
n` N_r-sct - c€7 I. c): M 0 h T e>('-l_r) 1 S.
Fab 26 ism
INFORMATION SERVICE
To
Q
Routing
Information Services
Modeling and Alloc.
Regional Office
Initial

NPDES WASTE LOAD ALLOCATION
Rousing on R- erse
4,2
Facility Name : 44 C'‘24
Date : rid .�_�.�=; /� ) )Z.,
County: 57).1.7V4y Permit No.: /1 ek9t) 430 8 Pipe No.: D v /
Receiving Stream:
Class : /' / -7
Design Capacity (I3D): 0, D 73- Design Temp.: Requestor: 4/Lit - rY.1ry
Sub -basin: Q,3 - o % O
Other Stream Affected:
Drainage Area: 7Q10: 0, 3
Class:
Limits (circle one): Effluent or Water Quality Avg. Stream Flow: DO Sag Pt. (mi. )
Effluent
Characteristics
Monthly Average
Weejtly Average
Max. Daily
Conc.
Avg.
Load.
Max
mum
Minimum
Conc.
Load,
Conc.
Load,
. Conc.
Load.
Conc.
Load.
BM,.
,
,
,
_
1
Fecal Coliform
Disolved Oxygen
Total SS
NH3-N f''
( - cI S.
(1,
pH (range)
> ,5\. --- I\
r,n3r c'a-US_--
rg-(&
i v i n
L:.),��k-r
4-F-11,
! I rA ur`
,
ncrLr -Iv 11..c J"
,
IC.
Fx C E±r1
,a,,,
4�
C - C�O�f-
4\-
- ,n��`)r
r 1 icy
4,c-r
4F- m`` '
AA-
7- '-
rv-1
Tx r\
lc-4-f-
S] r, r� l<
{
> I'
1
r ri Ls.
F 41-1F
r1 rs i `
r-. r+ ' -
IV `-1`?(_
J
Lm)e.1f_«
_
4c�
F
&xc-r.
-24' 4'4-1,
j
.
pLOTTED
. /....----
Prepared by:
IS -3/78
uziin
A(A)
Reviewed by:
Date: 5 -R c�

NPDES WASTE LOAD ALLOCATION
Rowing on Reverse ide
Facility Name: Id 60 A%
County: 71.4-"iC `/
Receiving Stream: 4;',04.,/ 4/4--
Date: 11c//�'')
Permit No.: ,,J(OOOS4iOg Pipe No.: Q(iZ
Class:
Design Capacity (IJD) : (O. O '4 Design Temp.: Requestor: c Q .; -
Sub -basin: 493-6)/ - t9t3 Drainage Area: 7Q10:
Other Stream Affected: Class:
Limits (circle one) : Effluent or wars Quality Avg. Stream Flow: DO Sag Pt. (mi.)
3o,leri 3\a ,ci�< nlo.s F .,� �� �c:a� ' t
.u.
Effluent
Characteristics
U ,
Monthiv,Ayerage
_. _ _
Weekly Averaee
Max. Da.ijy Avg.
Maximum_
mum
Conc.
Load,
Conc,
Load,
Conc. ,
Load,
Conc.,
Load,
Conc.
Load.
BOD5
_
_
,
,
_
Fecal Coliform
_
i
Disolved Oxygen
Total SS
rnn BPT
h rr,"i-kc
-Pc
++
bdi I�"
,
lint(
,--I vturt
NH3N
,
'pH (range)
(r, _11c
ee-itip? C
,
R k l
cy a
1,F - r
=C' Fit) t) in a
'4�., A"--
`
r —V t- rY
f ? ` utk
�o F
? r,F. �- ct
2 , Q
�f refer
0
Al-NI�Jf
-1-11t`
Yv,A4_1(,..1
L
2�Ff
Gfrn
rAV(E
wn d1
nr-4
I',T
II``
\)A
rv..t St
tt
L
fECE1v
t'>r taj.
( 4<<r\
F-r
4-t1(-
-)r1
-k(, FKOY-
11
-c_
_.2q°("
.
J
_
_
PLOTTE
.
Prepared by:
/ „It;
Reviewed by:
Date: 6 — 8 i?d
IS -3/78

NPDES WASTE LOAD ALLOCATION
Routing on Reverse Side
Facility Name : ,( OD 4-
Date:
County: ,5773>,/c i Permit No.: /i/eoce '..?a4' Pipe No.: &Ds/
Receiving Stream: l fc'/e;r✓�„� L;l�
Class :
Design Capacity (NOD)2.5 " Design Temp. _ Requestor: /77ie:a
Sub -basin: C?,' D - a.") Y' Drainage Area: 7Q10: 0,30c
Other Stream Affected: Class:
Limits (circle one): Effluent or Water Quality Avg. Stream Flow: DO Sag Pt. (mi. )
Effluent
Characteristics
Monthly Average
Weekly Average
Marc. Daily Avf;.
Ma
mum
Nti.nlmum
Conc.
Load,
Conc,
Load,
Conc,
Load.
Conc.
Load,
Conc.
_
Load.
BOD5
Fecal Coliform
_
Disolved Oxygen
Total SS
NH3 N
(0 `�
S U .
-
pH (range) p.
hzki
r'ic1 02.
uS€
r.cc,1V
r,
`�
r � s�n
Y
•7�)-4; �-,. (,,,,,--
I
P xr
rF-r1
.. , 91
OF etr-Fs-;
0 �Itic
1.Lr
k trL,*:I
,r , I t
l)2-1P•r
= i poi nc
-Is- v"Yl •
ri t 4 a U"f
r�c4
i r,
n t)') n Z.
si,a
11
C a
4 i4F
I' ECir
w ? r
s
�t-tAlE
�a1
-}(3
rl,
['!1• ,Cr
t
.
,.01G[T2_,
LO
..
•
Prepared by:
p-nr1�I�C �Uzur,
Reviewed by:
Date: `J .g - so
IS -3/78

NPDES WASTE LOAD ALLOCATION
Roufl ng on Reverse ide
Other Stream Affected:
Facility Name: /�C•a--
County: J i'��e y
Receiving Stream: L,r
Permit No.: A/ )OC j226; '
Design Capacity (NED): 0.07d Design Temp.: Requestor:
Date: ‘;//9/%'
Pipe No.: COY -
Class: C
Sub -basin: C3-07 - OS' Drainage Area: 7Q10: G . 3 c�5
Class:
Limits (circle one): Effluent or Water Quality Avg. Stream Flow: DO Sag Pt. (mi.)
J
Effluent
Characteristics
Monthly Average
Weekly Average
Max. DaLlv
Conc,
Ava.
Load,
i t. i•
vi t
mien
Conc.
Load,
Conc.
Load.
. Conc,
Load.
Conc.
Load.
GODS
_
,
.
_
Fecal Coliform
Disolved Oxygen
,
Potal SS
NH3-N
(. -1 ct
if,
q
�H (range)
`
VICA rP-
r -
4-
5 fr-c`f=isrir
`t
‘.1_:^�f
r �v)
1
r,>"�u{
`
JeShTtt
c W1,06-1. • iW 6' J
}�
\ 9. X C` F-
� ri
r
`
cl
Y F_F s �
C
� L t7
.Jfi +
,
Y\ ?4u
r e.1
t t ; a-� - r
-'-mill p're_.4
tIr
r'cl
1r
�r1LZ c+'Z.S
`r
SLfl
C�
.S_
��
r>:cAtI.
iY19
V
1
to?T i
c-
.
tt
(. i11
IC>
xfFF
t1
r-1
•a 90C.
,
_
_
p
0
ED
_.
Prepared by:
Jf- r i1►-t f"
U? Le%
Reviewed by:
T-/ri/e)
Date: 5
IS -3/78

NPDES WASTE LOAD ALLOCATION
Routing on Reverse Side
Facility Name: Me04
Date:
County: {� 7 .?rt/ Zti Permit No.: /�'� (O 2<?0±' Pipe No.: O1:9 4
Receiving Stream: Mi X„u dC , veYL
Class: %'ZZ'71-g'
Design Capacity (IUD): 0, 'j.3 V Design Temp.:. - Requestor: -, Lve- © c L.
Sub —basin: Drainage Area: 7QLO:
Other Stream Affected: Class:
Limits (circle one): Effluent or Water Quality Avg. Stream Flow: DO Sag Pt. (mi.)
e!,G,d.,,., GJL1h.- j L.c.,
Effluent
Characteristics
0
Mgntbly Average
Weekly Average
Max. Dal1.v
AvR.
Maxpum
Minim
Conc. _
Load;
Conc,
Load,
Conc.
Load,
Conc.
Load,
—
Conc.
Load.
IEOD5
Fecal Coliform
Disolved Oxygen
~
Total SS
pH3(range) r;
1'7
s A
C1el
C, ir
t./'SE,
T 1<-
'Y
I, Ic'I-
pc- t_ 11 117
�L
w-
re% rr1
liir ,
4,y?
.���=y►4���i
��1V
� ��
6"
fit,
-
-4 5- m E
rz -1 kit
_ v
Lin
Y1r'
�
J+ e�
�� � 1
2� Z
tt 4 lei
rcl`rs
�
1 V 1
. 1 4,1,T f .
'iT-- 1-
) ,
f -l_. a
i-
1km
7
o f .
.-
n s'
_..
.
_ PLOTTED
_,
,
_..,
.
.
Prepared by: j Fn 11'1-4 ?-( R J z O f
[KW
Reviewed by:
Date: Sj -a — 4?)O
IS -3/78

NPDES WASTE LOAD ALLOCATION
Routing on Reverse Side
Facility Name: A'62,1g
Date: �2 5//h`
County: -5-7) /eL / Permit No.: /✓e!1oD</3O8 Pipe No.: 7a'7
Receiving Stream:
Class: 43-74e
Design Capacity (M3D) : /. RO Design Temp.: Requestor: r .Prl4:
Sub -basin: C3 D1- 0 S Drainage Area: 7Q10:
Other Stream Affected: Class:
Limits (circle one): Effluent or Water Quality Avg. Stream Flow: DO Sag Pt. (mi.)
•
Effluent
Characteristics
Monthly Avegage
Weekly Average
Max. Duly
Avg,
dam
Man,,mum
Conc.
Load;
Conc.
Load,
Conc,
Load,
Conc.
Load,
Conc.
Load.
BOD5
Fecal Coliform
_-
Disolved Oxygen
Total SS
NH.3-N j'i
-9 Si
U •
pH (range) (OVA
1
1(1
n c li- r,
-
}1
-f t,,
t.� y
-, ,
c�
„,_,,..
f'
1
7
`ee
i..
yi?F �: �'�/7;rt E1
t0
f XC P
F
`s
1'6%9
f irk
C-
2
./E.
10\
-Lac
r) a--
`
tr ?1
~ w p
- r
.1k. jl � r a`r-1
C , i i_c
z V1\
i r)
n E.)
[+
0"
. �
ll
s^
i•U SE.-
:11
E GC
i v l n
s�-) -t4-r
-
r ,- LA
r-
-I c,
k�` F�
`�',
�
°�'
C
I_
c_
,
_
pLorrED
Prepared by: Jr-r)'I
v7Ur)
Reviewed by:
•ru
Date: 5 -? - 8d
IS -3/78

NPDES WASTE LOAD ALLOCATION
Routing on Reverse Side
Facility Name:
County:
c5 ;'j?r✓"C
Receiving Stream: yid,), &J t, verc.
Permit No.: /+/C o S/) 0(J1
Date: /46
Pipe No.: 708
Class: i 2Z t€
Design Capacity (MGD) : e2. 'O) Design Temp.: Requestor: - r72i 4
Sub —basin: C.S r;) ? - G e Drainage Area: 7Q10:
Other Stream Affected: Class:
Limits (circle one): Effluent or Water Quality Avg. Stream Flow: DO Sag Pt. (mi. )
Effluent
Characteristics
6 v
Monthly Average
, Weekly Average
Max, -idly Avg.
mum
7.1111Z
Conc.
Load;
Conc.
Load
Conc.
Load,
Conc._
Load,
Conc.
Load,
BOD5
Fecal Coliform
Disolved Oxygen
Total SS
NH3—N
(o —el .S
, LA •
_77
pH (range)
� � � 1(
nest r.�
11 ii
Thy
rFc
F L � i
``
k 0 . -61
11
(-1 ' iur
71Yr11'G-1 ivvU:.
EX r P- -
P .D.__
rf- ..
C -, 1, )_r ,
_ _tatr fF
I
4
I
\.)_[ =
r wl
i r1 r o
eN a-
.� I-) A
Qs� tJ..Scc'
4-t"1z
cr-C' Pi
di_ ci
li)7si-i
J
-I4--n1Iv-
[att1F-
-1c.
FXf'F,c-1
,
,
.D9oc
PL
_
.
_
_.
. .
,
,
Prepared by:
Ph (4-. ( BV-z-uh
Reviewed by:
Date: 5-e-so
IS -3/78

NPDES WASTE LOAD ALLOCATION
Routing on Reverse Side
Facility Name:
Aodyk
County:
Receiving Stream: ?
Design Capacity (IUD): a 0g
Z4/c-'
Permit No.: i ✓CQ22 4,; O/
Date: ////,1')
Pipe No.: ��
Class : 2z-7Le
Design Temp.: Requestor: iw'G' ��� - l 2/ in
Sub —basin: 03-61- O
Other Stream Affected:
Limits (circle one): Effluent
[ 2°-
L£v:
Drainage Area: 7Q1O:
Class:
or Water Quality Avg. Stream Flow: DO Sag Pt. (mi. )
Effluent
Characteristics
Monthly Average
Weeklv Average
Max, Dai].v ova.
Maxmum
Minimum
Conc.
Load
Conc.
Load
Conc,
Load,
Conc,
-4
Load.
Conc.
Load.
BOD5
_
Fecal Coliform
_
_
_
Disolved Oxygen
Total SS
N143 N
C) —q
S.'
_
pH (range)
.c\,al\
r c c
e. -�15-
r -
..4,r,--,�
LO h4E(
t
r Litt
T-hirVil.ir7v4Li .
1CP
XCf-('1
1 Qs
AC- Cf�F'S_
1c147_ f
4 i
,
t- ur 0
I `Uc>A
A- i (-ft
to F-,
r,rl
i -1 r
th
,ram-
ram,
+k
ri-i
r_x
r
_
-4-5-tnrri-1.-'341/4.40-
-ka
_C%
EXCF-r-Art
27,
''C
f,.v
,
,, .,
P IiimaTTED
,
Prepared by:
jEn fEr , W2,-tir1
Reviewed by:
Date: 5 - g -,o
r�
IS -3/78

33°' 3' M/
i5 1C 57E ]7►)8 rest, iuN
/.TI...�,.�w
^G' ‘ I—�rZ'—'.' � zi••-•.-:.A, �
' �
\� \ ••a;pts}• ail jami`)��-�\�`—- . 6- oc/_\� da 'iYr )��7y; _i'
moti�-.�
^ [ �� or Pam,
4\ =ate
bw
49
:a
is
DonnS Grove
Ch
1114
awn
'74.`rttF
S ,r f (ft,
•
C ,9
c.wsr•
•
..
V
N.
�. Mtn=u �� .tsiilltK�rv�
�C �S
eater vp
ll•
tea; •I
•

•
•
P,P 6 oo -
_ Drw..h rcia 0C -
Cask-i l un-ir Um
Cr
t 1 co a
ountarcr
1 Z36. a°/ )7Z
fJR = 6,1 mnc,2
G)n % 6).0 eTs
300a. %o-70.1cis
aS �s
R 3 Gy
1, nci
Li+1 6- Nkounln
P(cCES Loa -I -Er om
jnc+
Plzn4' = O, 13 1l
Esl- AR ICI,3 m(2
" 7Qio= 0.7?ct3
R2r.
O,(omi
QW =0►8 ; O,3 t 0,07
E as+ �ac�in
P 0.Brno)
. a 3G,3095 '76
Lame Der
Q� = 3,9 ccs
. i3(4,3. 5" )76
7/to I,e•
Oft 3 mz2
Q(..= a3ce
CCnre ft nz( s'�s
n W - E34
rea.. loas4
or<-
LuE1/44-::
wW T P. 5, 7 rn
z LO€,s 4 n LO LOT P -417.8
3 Wrca
I), 2- 3 :13/rn
g3 3 %, C�rn4
Ry - is, W}/m,
Wssf B zc i t w T P=
. a t

Ro
Corn Con n i E . aeki n&C'S r)a Sis;
0,615 °/
/rni,
a
..RD L 0-1 `J /Yr.c
cis .
)23= 0 358
G ► O clq/rti1c
v atcc.i� t ES.
Ra_c4-N 1 = o
Rsch.- a =
Reeci-) 41 -.7
BPS
O. ia7 •
CTrcr6
Conn6-0
Co,8+.C-13+.-410-i,55 - G.0(75Y 6.a.79
(6.0
rs
0 p_ (0. 6 (LW) 1. 56 0. I
'.y
`P.
7)°'
6i6
0 ► I .1 Cosa-8 0. 77 -� 0-,15) 1..6-5 } a ,_ I 8) (9 3 aY.
(a 3)
o•
fi
. ..owin DO = C.) c�r. i 1.kC�p3� 2.h� ASS QM it
';14-NZ ei'tJfi*S Worn 1 {{DE,,S 001 _.O 0.5._ ._ _ a ra .
a+ 70 sz vra i dry Ca# 0.5°c.- 7, 5 '3/1
).
0 Po( 7 r,--i ua-n1 l _. D.
m + O. _m _. '7,5.6.?1 /J
o, l� m p � ��_ CO . �3
11, 7a5 rn3/1

4sl 0 ,aQ, cG
1D( 5.7 rn � z
4-17
T-= r)5 °C
Doso, Si rn3/
yvboss;
RI
L ,5
PCOV
__10 ,.13_Tc-ju
mi.
c‘rs
001. S "/i 21a7S
1c- 5 15
S (v e_ 3 a, 7 .4'7rnC. 3 ,..L 7
)41 . (�0 3.5137 0.5416 -7
G
c) ,--],%sc)). 1,o3a3
o 315 %rni, a , cA S
n,
ss 5. 'VI 5
ss i-ts
ODu.=3.8r611
R3
1,7 1, a
G, 1i o, 17
o c 6a G., 5
7, 56.
15 o
0.,5768 6,567,a
6,�qa.5 7,0)297
O.o5a
G 0

S-i nce. -, �s cl isChzi .is no rmi 4-Eci or- I�( �
+\ BOO 5 I M� _ -. C3 v u l ,_ - 38 m5/ti
S rIcL 4\--) E l oEn4- rim i- CS03 i 5 dIuJ
van cf corn !s 005_}LLt
-�
zl l o �bl Coneti4 rebil -� . _� . Oo 3 fz3 ups
5
is c t --7611uas �-
-l� l OD - 38me/f ' -�6-1f 4 - G1 8m D
�
(O5 _ Cor Goa)
riioa 3 - it 0)
B()D5 -For F-1.8- cos ----m
al I8mlo
10 I.

1
11 ss . b,i zhcvr
W
13"`
oQ a o — o, cos.. 1� u s ct s t-
usti O,C6c
G
ciou1 -r, (3 risT E.S coo 3 ) oc��4 zrCI vo5
o V r c D f o,.23 IlmciL) 1 a,of m1-
0 , 7+41 c'•
(c.).o5 tcs 4 0,711 0P) ` I,rr j/I = 0,I`6 mc-o ' 1,55 ` ?
clutiv-,J = 5. la ' `3/1
7, C9 7 I t wig
� v � 0 1- .24" 01 E. 64' k
- - 3 PT cony Po.oc a)T�� � _ (;

d
North Carolina Department of Natural
Resources &Community Development
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor Howard N. Lee, Secretary
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
TECHNICAL SERVICES BRANCH
May 7, 1980
Mr. David Jessup
Moore, Gardner & Assoc.
P. 0. Box 14327
Baton Rouge, La. 70898
Dear Dave,
Here is the allocation limit information for the two facilities
which we talked about: Greater Badin Wastewater Treatment Plant -
East and Greater Badin Wastewater Treatment Plant - West. The
allocations reflect the case of both plants discharging into Little
Mountain Creek, as shown on the attached map. The 7-day 10-year low
flow for the USGS station at Hwy. 740 is 0.3 cfs.
Greater Badin - West
Design flow = 0.13 MGD
BOD-ultimate..,= 45 mg/1
BOD5 = 17 mg/I
NH3-N = 7 mg/1
DO -effluent = 5 mg/1
TSS = 30 mg/1
Fecal Coliform = 1000/100 m1
pH = 6-9
Greater Badin - East
Design flow = 0.58 MGD
BOD-ultimate = 45 mg/1
BODS = 17 mg/1
NH3-N = 7 mg/1
DO -effluent = 5 mg/1
TSS = 30 mg/1
Fecal Coliform = 1000/100 ml
pH = 6-9
I hope this will be of use to you, and be sure to let me know if
you need anything more.
JB/afs
-c6d r,an
Uw 1 s -1(513,5 .
.sctLsll liccd
Yours truly,
cil
Jennifer 1'tttzun
Environmental Engineer
P. O. Box 27687 Raleigh, North Carolina 2761 1
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer

MOORE, GARDNER & ASSOCIATES. INC. - CONSULTING ENGINEERS
SUITES 7 & B
4521 JAMESTOWN AVENUE
BATON ROUGE. LOUISIANA 70898
May 1, 1980
Mr. Randy Williams
NC-NRCD
Technical Services Branch
P.O. Box 27687
Raleigh, NC 27611
TELEPHONE [phone]
P. O. BOX 14327
Dear Randy,
I have been placed in charge of a sanitary sewer evaluation survey (SSES)
for the towns of Badin and West Badin located in Stanly County. This
is a request for a stream assimulation capacity and required limits
for the treatment plants in both Badin and West Badin. West Badin
discharges into Little Mountain Creek and Badin discharges into Honey
Creek which eventually confluences with Little Mountain Creek. This
information is necessary to develop the cost-effectiveness between
renovating the collection systems or requiring additional treatment.
Please send this information as soon as possible.
How are things going in the Point Source Modeling Group? I heard that
Mark got placed in charge of the Intensive Monitoring Unit which
should leave a promotion in line for you. I hope things work out
for you. Please say hello to your family and our mutual friends for
me.
Looking forward to hearing from you in the next couple of weeks.
Sincerely,
Moore, Gardner and Associates, Inc.
David J. Jessup
DJJ/gd