Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20011381 Ver 1_General Correspondence_20000414Mitchell a f ENVIRONMIN 113 West 3rd St. • Greenv N 3975 Market St. Bldg. D Suite A • April 6, 2000 Mrs. Jennifer Frye RECEIVED N.C. Dept. of EHNR APR J4 W Winston -Salem As, InQoionai dates,Office L C NSULTANTS 858 25 2.4077 • Fax: 252.752.7380 n. _.. . 280 •910.254.0602 • Fax: 910.254.0603 Division of Water Quality Department of Environment and Natural Resources 585 Wvghtown Street Wmston- Salem, North Carolina 27107 Dear Mrs. Frye: This letter is in reference to the Notice of Violation and Recommendation for Enforcement Action for a Stream Standard Violation and for Failure to Secure Water Quality Certification letter sent from your office to Mr. Rocky Carter or PTR, Inc., in Kernersville, North Carolina. This letter does not provide any legal representation or other legal service. Mr. Carter asked Mitchell & Associates, Inc., to respond with information on his behalf to explain the series of events surrounding the on -site project. The site is located on the west side of Patterson Avenue approximately 1,400 feet north of the intersection of Motor Road and Patterson Avenue in Winston- Salem, Forsyth County, North Carolina. Mr. Carter hired an engineering firm to provide him with engineering and permit assistance for the project. Mr. Steve Auffinger, P.E., was assigned to the project and has written a letter describmg the series of events as to why Mr. Carter and he, Mr. Auffinger, did not think a 404 permit, and therefore a 401 Certification, was required. Upon notification by the United States Corps of Engineers ( "USACOE ") Regulatory Branch through Mr. John Thomas, Project Manager, that the site was in violation of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act, Mr. Rocky Carter called Mitchell & Associates, Inc., to determine how to address the USACOE's concerns. Although no wetlands were apparently impacted with the project, we indicated a 404 permit was, and still is, required to fill the stream(s) on the project site because a stream is water of the United States. After discussion between Mr. Carter, James Taylor, and Mr. John Thomas, Mr. Rocky Carter requested Mitchell & Associates, Inc., prepare and submit an after the fact permit application for the project in order to obtain all remaining and necessary permits and certifications. 3 - r Y'S Afe S r t ' 1 '� _4� Mr. Carter indicates this project was the first project he was responsible for obtaining all federal, state, and local permits, and he indicates it has been a painful educational experience. Mr. Carter is now aware of the broad scope of the 404 permit program, the associated 401 Certification, and Use Standards. He assures me, and DENR. that he will conduct no future work without contacting an environmental consultant or other qualified individual and before all necessary permits and certifications have been applied for and received. Mr. Carter requests, as do we, the Division's understanding and patience during the 404 permit, and associated 401 Certification, process The engineer, Mr. Auffmger, designed the project with over -sized culverts that are buried 1.5 feet below the original stream bed. Mr. Auffinger indicates this design creates slow moving pools approximately one foot deep for the length of the culverts that provide for sediment trapping the sediment trapping provides sediment removal from the water and improves the stream's water quality —and structure for aquatic wildlife. This stream has been a channelized urban stream for over twenty five years that has been heavily polluted with solid waste, construction and demolition debris, and other wastes. Mr. Carter indicates construction and demolition debris and other solid waste had to be removed from the stream before installation of the culverts could occur. Mr. Carter and Mr. Auffmger indicate they have never observed anyone in the creek (besides their employees and those of Mitchell & Associates, Inc.) and indicate the flow of the stream is such that no boating, canoeing, or rafting occurs in the stream. Therefore, Mr. Carter and Mr. Auffmger indicate they do not believe the stream standards have been violated. Again, this letter in no way provides any legal representation or opinion. Enclosed you will find a letter from NIr. Auffmger, P.E., regarding his recollection and planning of the project. Please call my office if you have any comments or questions Thank you for your assistance with this matter. Sinctely, � 1r l 3ames y o l s 04/07/2000 11 44 3367781670 _ STEVE AUFFINGER PAGE 01 i .ASG Engineering = 4140 Clemmons Road, Suite 102, Clemmons, NC 27012 tel 336 -778 -1111 fax, 336 - 778 -1670 email auffQbellsouth net April 7, 2000 James Taylor Mitchell and Associates, Inc. 113 West Third Street Greenville, NC 27858 Via fax 252- 752 -7380 Re: Mr. Rocky Carter, PTR, Inc. Leak Fork Creek, Winston - Salem, NC Dear James: Per your request I am summarizing to my best recollection the process that we used to develop the construction plans for the project owned by Mr. Rocky Carter. This work was done while I was employed at Geoscience and Technology. I have detailed knowledge of the project as the engineer of record After several conversations with the Geoscience staff, individuals at the City of Winston -Salem / Forsyth County office of Erosion Control, and my client, I developed a list of possible permit requirements These included the following- • Forsyth County Unified Development Ordinances, Environmental Ordinances- Floodway and Floodway Fringe Regulations, and Erosion Control. • FEMA (flood control); • Wetlands, • Zoning, • Site constraints (setbacks, sewer line location, stream location, etc.). Rocky Carter reviewed the zoning and found it to be compatible with the intended use. Rocky and I discussed the potential for wetlands at the site with the City office of Erosion Control. Since the site was heavily wooded and dry, we concluded that the site was not a wetland. The City felt the same way, so Rocky decided that a detailed site Investigation was not warranted. Upon review of the FEMA regulations, I found these to be less restrictive than the County Ordnance. We therefore narrowed down the list of concerns to the City ordinances and the physical site constraints. Patterson Avenue has a very wide (150 feet) wide Right of Way adjacent to the project. This is due to early planning efforts to make Patterson Avenue a major north -south route through the city The construction of Route 52 into a four lane limited access highway de- pnoritlzed that effort Leak Fork Creek was parallel and adjacent to the front lot line, and it was evident from the local topography and its trapezoidal cross section that it had been channeled to its present location with the constriction of Patterson Avenue. The site itself was several feet lower than the adjacent street, but construction projects on the opposite side of Patterson Avenue could yield PRACTICAL CIVIL ENGINEERING SERVICES IN NORTH CAROLINA AND VIRGINIA COMMERCIAL & RESIDENTIAL SITE DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATIONS - GRADING - DRAINAGE - STRUCTURAL - HYDROLOGY - CULVERTS - PONDS - TRANSPORTATION 04/07/2000 11:44 3367781670 STEVE AUFFINGER PAGE 02 James Taylor Page 2 of 2 an inexpensive borrow source. I developed several design alternatives to manage the existing storm water channel. The selected alternative carried the 100 -year design storm through two oversize corrugated metal culverts, and would adhere to the City's requirement of no rise outside of the property line This alternative was drafted and reviewed with the City staff. In order to comply with the City Environmental Ordinances, we would need to perform a HEC analysis to document the hydraulics, and maintain or develop '/2 of the floodway fringe area on the site. At that point I proceeded with the HEC analysis for the culvert, which included a detailed survey of 15 or so cross sections through the project and adjacent areas, site inspection and estimate of Manning's N values at these sections. I also developed detailed grading and erosion control plans and design of new flood fringe areas. I hope this satisfies your requirements for a summary of the process that was used to develop the property If you have any questions please call me Sincerely, ASG Engineenng Stephen Auffinger, P.E. Professional Engineer enc. cc: Mr. Rocky Carter