The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About820331_Routine Inspection_20211110Facility Number $livision of Water Resources 0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation 0 Other Agency f/n 5' /1 l z-/ Type of Visit: ...0-Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance Reason for Visit: jaRoutine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access Date of Visit: Farm Name: 5 'c Arrival Time: 'SYZ)h Departure Time: Owner Name: Ste„ c()ii efe..� Mailing Address: Physical Address: Facility Contact: 1/:36'1 Owner Email: Phone: County: Region: Onsite Representative: Certified Operator: Back-up Operator: Location of Farm: 76 -1,, Title: Phone: 1t Latitude: Integrator: Certification Number: Certification Number: Longitude: l ;3q3 Swine Design Current Capacity Pop. Wean to Finish Wean to Feeder eeder to Finish Farrow to Wean Farrow to Feeder Farrow to Finish Gilts Boars Other Design Current Wet Poultry Capacity Pop. Layer Non -Layer Dry Poultry Design Current Capacity Pop'. Layers Non -Layers Pullets Turkeys Turkey Poults Other Cattle Design Current Capacity Pop. Dairy Cow Dairy Calf Dairy Heifer Dry Cow Non -Dairy Beef Stocker Beef Feeder Beef Brood Cow Discharges and Stream Impacts 1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other: a. Was the conveyance man-made? b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR) c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)? d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR) 2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? 3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes __12 No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA 0 NE ❑ Yes.--ffTo 0 NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE Page 1 of 3 5/12/2020 Continued ; 4m�i111:11114 • • „ • • • • . : • • • , • • 4t. if' .2 A 11' -St„„„. ,,„., ; e A N., . A „ • • • • .1 • A - • „,' t .•„.1 • "„ • t- '-7•;-37---, ,„ • 1 • „? • ht's . . reiviO4,t65,84Aita"......NAM4.0,4,404 .• • - • - • • 4. ••• • ' • 44 • • I . • 41.9.(?•--3.! - • !,)11'fffie,--.: , y‘, •i 'Or , , 0 4'f44:'' ri:/,(1? 7 I 1 I S a •J4 4 4 4ill 41.1 •. • • •,- , .i . , • t ,:,.,....- , 4.-, i :'.': ,;;0 -m.• ...ii . , , ,T,0.-,f_. 'i •,).?_ il• ,Ttir -i 1 .-.,,-,:•:. . • ., ',,,,,- ,.., . • ) .7 •• r; '• • . (.• • . •-• : • ; i • : -• • Facility Number: - Date of Inspection: ////) /7- Waste Collection & Treatment 4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? Identifier: Spillway?: Designed Freeboard (in): Observed Freeboard (in): ❑ Yes ,Ei'No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6 5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.) 6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE waste management or closure plan? If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWR 7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes�'No ❑ NA ❑ NE 8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks) 9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or improvement? Waste Application 10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or improvement? 11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ,allo ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes -,IE'No ❑ NA LINE ❑ Yes .,E'No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes - 110 ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes ,Ellco ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.) ❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window 12. Crop Type(s): 13. Soil Type(s): ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area //exe_ eli-e-e-0-/ 6rr.4e L3eri4A)5&& aiwued 14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? 15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? 16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acres determination? 17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? 18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? Required Records & Documents 19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? 20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check the appropriate box. ❑ WUP ❑ Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements 21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ Yes ,,12,No ❑ Yes _2-No ❑ Yes _;1-No ❑ Yes ri:]-No ❑ Yes .E"No ❑ Yes No ❑ Other: ❑NA ❑NE ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑NA ❑NE 0 NA ❑ NE ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ NA ❑ NE ZalCfaste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Weather Code ❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield �I20 Minute Inspections ['Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections ❑ Sludge Survey 22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes.�'No ❑ NA ❑ NE 23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes .e'No ❑ NA ❑ NE Page 2 of 3 5/12/2020 Continued ,Yes ❑ No Facility Number:r,2 - 33 % Date of Inspection: %/// )/ / 24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes „E"No ❑ NA 0 NE 25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes .E`No ❑ NA 0 NE the appropriate box(es) below. ❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels ❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance: 26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes --No ❑ NA ❑ NE 27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE Other Issues 28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes ,ErNo ❑ NA ❑ NE and report mortality rates that were higher than normal? 29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes U 1\l0 ❑ NA ❑ NE If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately. 30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes ifFio ❑ NA ❑ NE permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application) 31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes --if1710 ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other: 32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE 33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative? ❑ Yes frNo ❑ NA ❑ NE 34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes _ No ❑ NA ❑ NE Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments. Use drawings of facility to better explain situations (use additional pages as necessary). /LFzQO ?iv ae7ei . .41:0 1cao 71,ree.,77 4eek Camni*(16 GCi�irr odz:O �"�cr�za*�c% �0�-� c� 7a Cay..t� GrJCLO D d1T7e . rri'Sc).-riC x clen!' (01/ Reviewer/Inspector Name: IO / a t if,e,e/Ofl) Reviewer/Inspector Signature: «/44Gute0-7-1.___ Phone: 96 3S r cl 7S Date: /// / 0 / / Page 3 of 3 5/12/2020 FACILITY #: ,r02--e3% FARM NAME: FREEBOARD ACTUAL LAGOON LEVEL PERMIT (#19) DUE EVERY 5 YEARS - EXPERIATION DATE NUMBER OF ANIMALS �"2"6- - OIC CARD YES OR NO WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN (WUP) (#20) SOIL TYPES CROP TYPES - THE UTLIZATION PLAN SHOULD HAVE A (-) NEGATIVE NUMBER - ODOR CONTROL CHECK LIST OR NO - Irrigation Plan Maps WASTE REPORT (#21) -GOOD FOR 60 DAYS BEFORE OR AFTER DATE 1/4/1 6/��' NITROGEN LEVEL SOIL REPORT (#21) EVERY 3 YEARS: DATE /2-e 2- P-I (NO MORE THEN 400) PH (Note if 4 or Tess) CuIZN (NO MOR E THEN 3000) CU Z (IF PEANUTS NO MORE THEN 300) MENTAL CHECK OF CROP AND FIELD NUMBERS IRR2 (#21) ZONE ACRES PAN CROP TYPE FLOW RATES NITROGEN (N) 120 Min inspection initialed Weather Codes Commercial Fertilizer Chicken Litter CALBRIATION (#24) - EACH REEL SHOULD BE CALIBRATED - DATE DUE EVERY TWO YEARS/ 2- - FLOW RATES RAIN FALL (#21) -INITIAL AFTER 1" RAIN EVENT -LOOK FOR ANY LEVEL THAT IS LESS THEN THE DESIGNED FREEBORED -LOOK FOR BIG NUMBER DIFFERENCES SEE THAT THEY MATCH THE IRR2 FORM pLU GE (#21 & 25) -DUE EVERY YEAR: DATE / 5 o 0: ,3 , f P: . 3 % RATIO OF SLUDGE OTHER FORMS (#22 AND #21) RAIN BREAKER FORM CROP YEILDS MORTALITY 'Il0' 7 VISUAL CHECK FOUNDATION OR PIT LEAKS PIPE LEAKS LAGOON SEEPAGE LAGOON BARE AREAS TREES OR GRASS NEED TO BE REMOVED EROSION DITCHES WINTER CROP(OVERSEEDED) ALIVE CROP HARVESTED FIELDS GOOD HEALTHY CORPS . CORRECT CROPS NO PONDING REELS FEED BINS LAGOON GARBAGE