20131197 Ver 1_Application_20131113

v
MI
Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.4 January 2009
Pre - Construction Notification (PCN) Fora
A. Applicant Information
1. Processing
1a. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps:
© Section 404 Permit ❑ Section 10 Permit
1b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 14 or General Permit (GP) number:
1 c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
® Yes ❑ No
1d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
© 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non -404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ❑X Riparian Buffer Authorization
1 e. Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWQ
401 Certification:
❑ Yes ❑X No
For the record only for Corps Permit:
❑ Yes ❑X No
1f. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for
mitigation of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank
or in -lieu fee program.
❑ Yes © No
1g. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1h
below.
M Yes ❑ No
1 h. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
❑ Yes 0 No
2. Project Information
2a. Name of project:
Beaufort 161
2b. County:
Beaufort
2c. Nearest municipality / town:
Pantego
2d. Subdivision name:
N/A
2e. NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state project no:
17BP.2.R.53
3. Owner Information
3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed:
North Carolina Department of Transportation
3b. Deed Book and Page No.
N/A
3c. Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable):
N/A
3d. Street address:
105 Pactolus Highway NC 33 P.O. Box 1587
3e. City, state, zip.
Greenville, NC 27835
3f. Telephone no.:
252 -439 -2800
3g. Fax no.:
252 -830 -3341
3h. Email address:
jbjohnson @ncdot.gov
Pagel of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

4. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a. Applicant is:
❑ Agent Q Other, specify: Division 2 Environmental Officer
4b. Name:
Jay B. Johnson
4c. Business name
(if applicable):
North Carolina Department of Transportation
4d. Street address:
P.O. Box 1587
4e. City, state, zip:
Greenville, NC 27835
4f. Telephone no.:
252 -439 -2800
4g. Fax no.:
252 - 830 -3341
4h. Email address:
jbjohnson @ncdot.gov
5. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a. Name:
N/A
5b. Business name
(if applicable):
5c. Street address:
5d. City, state, zip:
5e. Telephone no.:
5f. Fax no.:
5g. Email address:
Page 2 of 10

B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID):
Beaufort 161 Bridge to Pipe Replacement
1b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees):
I Latitude: 35.603214 Longitude: - 76.73594
1c. Property size:
acres
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water to proposed project:
Broad Creek Canal
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water:
C; Sw, NSW
2c. River basin:
Tar - Pamlico
3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
SR 1616 Terra Cela Rd is a paved secondary road. Agriculture dominates the landscape.
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property: 0
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property: 92
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
Bridge to pipe replacement; the existing bridge has deteriorated and needs replacing.
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
The existing 52' long timber bridge on timber pilings will be replaced with a 34' -0" x 10'-8" aluminum box culvert.
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
project (including all prior phases) in the past?
❑ Yes © No ❑ Unknown
Comments:
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
of determination was made?
❑ Preliminary ❑ Final
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known):
Agency /Consultant Company:
Other.
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
5. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
❑Yes ® No ❑ Unknown
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project?
❑ Yes ❑X No
6b. If yes, explain.
Page 3 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1 a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
❑ Wetlands ® Streams — tributaries ❑X Buffers ❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a.
Wetland impact
number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary
2b.
Type of impact
2c.
Type of wetland
2d.
Forested
2e.
Type of jurisdiction
Corps (404,10) or
DWQ (401, other)
2f.
Area of
impact
(acres)
W1
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
-
W2 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
-
W3 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
_
W4 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
-
W5 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
-
W6 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
-
2g. Total Wetland Impacts:
2h. Comments:
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a.
Stream impact
number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary m
3b.
Type of impact
3c.
Stream name
3d.
Perennial (PER) or
intermittent (INT)?
3e.
Type of
jurisdiction
3f.
Average
stream
width
(feet)
3g.
Impact
length
(linear
feet)
S1 P
Culvert
Broad Creek Canal
PER
Corps
15
55
S2 T
Culvert
Broad Creek Canal
PER
Corps
15
21
S3 -
Choose one
S4 T
Choose one
Broad Creek Canal
PER
Corps
15
16
S5 -
Choose one
-
-
S6 -
Choose one
-
-
3h. Total stream and tributary
impacts
92
3i. Comments:
S2 impact is actually S1 temporary impact.
Page 4 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individually list all open water impacts below.
4a.
Open water
impact number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary
4b.
Name of waterbody
(if applicable)
4c.
Type of impact
4d.
Waterbody
type
4e.
Area of impact (acres)
01
Choose one
Choose
O2 -
Choose one
Choose
O3
Choose one
Choose
04 -
Choose one
Choose
4f. Total open water impacts
4g. Comments:
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, the complete the chart below.
5a.
Pond ID number
5b.
Proposed use or
purpose of pond
5c.
Wetland Impacts (acres)
5d.
Stream Impacts (feet)
5e.
Upland
(acres)
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
P1
Choose one
P2
Choose one
5f. Total:
5g. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If any impacts require miti anon then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a. Project is in which protected basin?
❑ Neuse ❑X Tar - Pamlico ❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman ❑ Other:
6b.
Buffer Impact
number -
Permanent (P) or
Temporary
6c.
Reason for impact
6d.
Stream name
6e.
Buffer
mitigation
required?
6f.
Zone 1
impact
(square
feet )
6g.
Zone 2
impact
(square
feet
B1 P
Fill
Broad Creek Canal
No
660
204
B2 P
Fill
Broad Creek Canal
No
755
265
B3 P
Fill
Broad Creek Canal
No
651
249
B4 P
Fill
Broad Creek Canal
No
738
188
B5 -
Yes/No
B6 -
Yes/No
6h. Total Buffer Impacts:
2,804
906
61. Comment ..Zone 1 Impacts - 0.0644 Acres, Zone 2 Impacts 0.0208 Acres
Page 6 of 10

D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
There are 92 linear feet of stream impacts along with 2804 sq.ft. of buffer zone 1 impacts and 906 sq.ft of buffer zone 2 impacts due to the installation
of a 34' -0" x 10' -8' aluminum box culvert.
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
Use of existing roadway to operate construction equipment.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
❑ Yes ® No
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
❑ DWQ ❑ Corps
2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
project?
❑ Mitigation bank
El Payment to in -lieu fee program
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank:
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
Type: Choose one
Type: Choose one
Type: Choose one
Quantity:
Quantity:
Quantity:
3c. Comments:
4. Complete if Making a Pa ment to In-lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached.
❑ Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested:
linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature:
Choose one
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only):
square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4f. Non - riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4h. Comments:
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
Page 6 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

S. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
buffer mitigation?
Yes ❑X No
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
Zone
6c.
Reason for impact
6d.
Total impact
(square feet)
Multiplier
6e.
Required mitigation
(square feet)
Zone 1
3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2
1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund).
6h. Comments:
Page 7of10

E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified
❑X Yes ❑ No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
See Stormwater Management Plan
© Yes ❑ No
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project?
%
2b. Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan?
Yes ❑ No
2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why:
2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
- Stormwater will be allowed to sheet flow off grassed roadway shoulders into existing grass ditches. No shoulder berm gutter or storm drainage
systems are proposed on this project, therefore there are no dined discharge points for roadway drainage.
- No ditch work is proposed on this project, therefore, existing ditches were not analyzed for grass swale treatment.
2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
DWQ 401 Unit
3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a. In which local government's jurisdiction is this project?
N/A
❑ Phase II
❑ NSW
3b. Which of the following locally - implemented stormwater management programs
❑ USMP
apply (check all that apply):
❑ Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other:
3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ❑ No
attached?
4. DWQ Stormwater Program Review
❑Coastal counties
❑HQW
4a. Which of the following state - implemented stormwater management programs apply
❑ORW
(check all that apply):
❑Session Law 2006 -246
®Other: NPDES Permit
4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes X❑ No
attached?
5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
❑ Yes ❑ No
5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
❑ Yes ❑ No
Page 8 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

F. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal /state/local) funds or the
0 Yes
❑ No
use of public (federal /state) land?
1 b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State
❑ Yes
©No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
❑ Yes
❑ No
letter.)
Comments:
2. Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H.1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards,
❑ Yes
© No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b. Is this an after - the -fact permit application?
❑Yes
❑X No
2c. If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
❑Yes
® No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b. If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non - discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
Page 9of10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
❑ Yes Q No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
❑ Yes ® No
impacts?
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
-
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
Onsite field investigation by Jay Johnson "No Effect"
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat?
❑ Yes Q No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
Mr. Travis Wilson, NCWRC - See attached document
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
❑ Yes ©No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
NCDOT HEU Historic Architecture and Archaeology - See attached letter
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA- designated 100 -year floodplain?
Q Yes ❑ No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
Designed to no-rise standards
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?
FEMA FIRM Maps
Jay B. Johnson
11 -05 -2013
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name
Date
A is n A nt's Signature
(Agent's nat is lid only if an authorization
letter from the applicant Is provided.)
Page 10 of 10

PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION FORM
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL
DETERMINATION (JD): 10/10/12
B. NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERSON REQUESTING PRELIMINARY JD:
NCDOT
Jay Johnson- Division 2 DEO
Post Office Box 1587
Greenville, North Carolina 27835
C. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER: Wilmington (Washington Field
Office) NCDOT Bridge Beaufort #161 WBS 17BP.2.IL53 Bridge to Pipe replacement
D. PROJECT LOCATION(S) AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION: This project is
located on NCSR 1616 Terra Ceia Rd. over Broad Creek Canal in Beaufort Co.
(IF NECESSARY, USE THE ATTACHED TABLE TO DOCUMENT MULTIPLE
WATERBODIES AT DIFFERENT SITES)
1. State: NC County: Beaufort City: Pantego .
2. Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format):
Lat. 35.603214 /Long. 76.73594
3. Name of nearest waterbody: Broad Creek Canal
4. Identify (estimate) amount of waters in the review area
a. Non - wetland waters: linear feet: 149 and/or acres.
i) Cowardin Class(es): Riverine
ii) Stream Flow: Perennial
b. Wetlands: 2+ acres.
i) Cowardin Class(es): Riverine
7. Name of onsite water bodies identified as Section 10 waters:
❑ Tidal
ER Non -Tidal

.g
E. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT
APPLY):
❑ Office (Desk) Determination / Date:
® Field Determination/ Date(s): 10 /10 /12

•
1. The Corps of Engineers believes that there may be jurisdictional waters of the United States
on the subject site, and the permit applicant or other affected parry who requested this
preliminary JD is hereby advised of his or her option to request and obtain an approved
jurisdictional determination (JD) for that site. Nevertheless, the permit applicant or other person
who requested this preliminary JD has declined to exercise the option to obtain an approved JD
in this instance and at this time.
2. In any circumstance where a permit applicant obtains an individual permit, or a Nationwide
General Permit (NWP) or other general permit verification requiring "pre- construction
notification" (PCN), or requests verification for a non - reporting NWP or other general permit,
and the permit applicant has not requested an approved JD for the activity, the permit applicant is
hereby made aware of the following: (1) the permit applicant has elected to seek a permit
authorization based on a preliminary JD, which does not make an official determination of
jurisdictional waters; (2) that the applicant has the option to request an approved JD before
accepting the terms and conditions of the permit authorization, and that basing a permit
authorization on an approved JD could possibly result in less compensatory mitigation being
required or different special conditions; (3) that the applicant has the right to request an
individual permit rather than accepting the terms and conditions of the NWP or other general
permit authorization; (4) that the applicant can accept a permit authorization and thereby agree to
comply with all the terms and conditions of that permit, including whatever mitigation
requirements the Corps has determined to be necessary; (5) that undertaking any activity in
reliance upon the subject permit authorization without requesting an approved JD constitutes the
applicant's acceptance of the use of the preliminary JD, but that either form of JD will be
processed as soon as is practicable; (6) accepting a permit authorization (e.g., signing a proffered
individual permit) or undertaking any activity in reliance on any form of Corps permit
authorization based'on a preliminary JD constitutes agreement that all wetlands and other water
bodies on the site affected in any way by that activity are jurisdictional waters of the United
States, and precludes any challenge to such jurisdiction in any administrative or judicial
compliance or enforcement action, or in any administrative appeal or in any Federal court, and
(7) whether the applicant elects to use either an approved JD or a preliminary JD, that JD will be
processed as soon as is practicable. Further, an approved JD, a proffered individual permit (and
all terms and conditions contained therein), or individual permit denial can be administratively
appealed pursuant to 33 C.F.R. Part 331, and that in any administrative appeal, jurisdictional
issues can be raised (see 33 C.F.R. 331.5(a)(2)). If, during that administrative appeal, it becomes
necessary to make an official determination whether CWA jurisdiction exists over a site, or to
provide an official delineation of jurisdictional waters on the site, the Corps will provide an
approved JD to accomplish that result, as soon as is practicable.
This preliminary JD finds that there "may be" waters of the United States on the subject project
site, and identifies all aquatic features on the site that could be affected by the proposed activity,
based on the following information: onsite meetings with USACE
F. SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for preliminary JD (check all that apply -
checked items should be included in case file and, where checked and requested,
appropriately reference sources below):

❑ Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the
applicant/consultant:
❑ Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the applicant/consultant.
❑
Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report.
❑ Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report.
❑ Data sheets prepared by the Corps:
❑ Corps navigable waters' study:
❑ U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas:
❑ USGS NHD data.
❑ USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps.
® U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name: Pantego
® USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey.
❑ National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name:
❑ StateUcal wetland inventory map(s):
❑ FEMA/FIRM maps:
❑ 100 -year Floodplain Elevation is: (National Geodectic Vertical Datum of 1929)
❑ Photographs ❑ Aerial (Name & Date):
or ❑ Other (Name & Date):
❑ Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter:
® Other information (please specify): Survey drawing and NCDOT Environmental Officer
conducted on -site JD
EMMRTANT NOTE: The information recorded on this form has not necessarily been
verified by the Corps and should not be relied upon for later jurisdictional determinations.
Signature and date
Regulatory Project Manager
(REQUIRED)
4
(L � (), Z�,
Sign a iate
Pe n r preliminary JD
QUIREDless obtaining the
signature is impracticable) -

Project 71acking No.:
13 -10 -0014
NO ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEY REQUIRED FORM '
aa• This form only pertains to ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES for this project. It is not r "
valid for Historic Architecture and Landscapes. You must consult separately with the
Historic Architecture and Landscapes Group.
PROJECT INFORMATION
Project No: Bridge 161
WBS No: 17BP.2.R.53
F.A. No:
Federal Permit Required?
County:
Document:
Beaufort
MCS
Funding: M State ❑ Federal
M Yes ❑ No Permit Type: NWP14
Project Description: This project proposes to replace Bridge 161, a 52ft long by 25.4ft wide timber bridge,with a
34ft long by 10.8f t aluminum box culvert The existing structure carries SR1616 (Terra Ceia Rd) over Broad
Creek canal in Beaufort County, North Carolina. According to the environmental input request, the undertaking
involves the in place replacement of the structure along the existing alignment, thereby minimizing potential
surface and subsurface disturbances at this location. An off site detour route (SR1616 to SR1623 to SR1621 to
SR1613 to SR1616) is'anticipated. The archaeological Area of Potential Effects (APE) is centered upon Bridge
161 and measures 600ft in length (304ftfrom each bridge endpoint) and 150ft in width (75ftfrom each side of
the SR1616 center- line).
SUMMARY OF CULTURAL RESOURCES REVIEW
Brief description of review activities, results of review, and conclusions:
The project area is located in the northeastern portion of Beaufort, north of the Pamlico River and west of the
Pungo River, within the small community of Gaylord. In the APE, the subject watercourse constitutes a man -made
channelized drainage feature. A short distance to the southeast, the canal empties into Broad Creek, which in turn
joins Pungo Creek. The general project location, as well as the area surrounding it, is characterized by level flatland
and reclaimed marshland situated at 1011 AMSL. This entire area was drained in the late nineteenth /early
twentieth centuries for use as fertile agricultural land. Aerial imagery and topographic maps depict hundreds of
small drainage canals surrounding Gaylord. These drained land surfaces typify the archaeological APE with the area
east of the bridge in agriculture and the area west of the bridge in residence.
First, construction design data and other pertinent project information were examined for determining the
character and extent of potential impacts to the ground surfaces surrounding Bridge 161. Once an APE was
defined, a map review and site file search was conducted at the Office of State Archaeology (OSA) on Friday,
October 25, 2013. This background work determined that no previously documented archaeological sites are
located in the archaeological APE, or within a one mile or more radius of the bridge location.
Examination of National Register of Historic Places (NRHP), State Study Listed (SL), Locally Designated (LD),
Determined Eligible (DE), and Surveyed Site (SS) properties employing resources available on the NCSHPO website
is crucial in establishing the location of noteworthy historic occupations related to a perspective construction
Impact area. A cross -check of these mapped resources concluded that no meaningful historic properties with
potentially contributing archaeological elements were situated inward of the APE limits. However, this work did
locate one (SL) resource located immediately adjacent to the APE in the northeastern quadrant. Documented in
2012 as the Hertford Harris Gravehouse (BF1288), this resource is a small family cemetery plot situated
approximately 25ft north of SR1616. It appears that at least nine graves, possibly more, are present. Seven of these
are characterized by concrete vaults, while another grave locale appears to be protected by a make -shift wooden
"grave- house". This cemetery feature should be avoided during any construction activities related to the
replacement of Bridge No. 161. In general, the cultural resources review confirmed that no existing NRHP listed
properties or pre - existing, unassessed archaeological sites will be impacted by the proposed road improvement
project, and little potential exists for the recovery of meaningful prehistoric or historic deposits in the APE.
"No ARCHAEOLOGY SURVEY REQUIRED "form for Minor Thussportarion NoJectr as Qualyled to the 2007 Programmatic Agreement.
I of 2

Project Tracking No.:
Further, the APE was referenced on topographic, geologic and NRCS soil survey maps (At, To) for the evaluation of
environmental, geomorphological, hydrological, or other correlatives that may have resulted in past occupation at
this location. Finally, aerial photographs (NCDOT Spatial Data Viewer) were examined and the Google Street View
map application was utilized (when amenable) for gaining a virtual, first -hand perspective of the overall study area
and for assessing disturbances, both natural and human induced, which compromise the integrity of potential
archaeological sites /deposits. For the most part, environmental determinants do not suggest a heightened
archaeological site potential within or proximal to the APE.
Brief Explanation of why the available Information provides a reliable basis for reasonably predicting
that there are no unidentified historic properties in the APE:
The project APE contains no NRHP listed historic properties, previously documented archaeological sites, or
cemeteries. Based on soil data and aerial imagery, the majority of the APE is characterized by drained land surfaces
utilized today as agricultural farm land or for residential homesites. As such, the project APE has no potential for
the recovery of prehistoric artifacts or for the documentation of pre - Columbian deposits or features since the area
was too marginal for occupation in prehistory. While some very minor probability exists for uncovering a
historic /modern artifact related to the later settlement and agricultural utilization of these lands, the potential for
documenting intact, significant National Register of Historic Places (NRHP) eligible historic deposits is remote. As
previously related, the Hertford Harris Gravehouse, located a few hundred feet east of the bridge along the
northern side of SR1616, should be avoided. No further archaeological input or work will be necessary for this
rural, state- funded NCDOT Division 2 bridge replacement project.
SUPPORT DOCUMENTATION
See attached: ® Map(s) ® Previous Survey Info ® Photos ❑Correspondence
❑ Photocopy of County Survey Notes Other:
FINDING BY NCDOT ARCHAEOLOGIST
NO ARCHAEOLOGY SUR VEY REQ UIRED
"No ARGIAEOLOOYSURYEY REQUIRED "form for Minor Traruportatton Projects as Qua/Jkd In the 2007 Programmatic Agreement.
2 of 2

Beaufort 161 BEAUFORT 161
SR 1616, TERRA CEIA TRACK ROAD
BROAD CREEK CANAL
PANTEGO USGS QUAD MAP
AND SHEET 9 OF THE SOIL SURVEY
OF BEAUFORT COUNTY
FIRM PANEL 6678 J
MAP NUMBER 3720667800)
PAMLICO 03020104
BROAD CREEK CANAL C;Sw,NSW
TAR - PAMLICO BASIN
r WBS ELEMENT NUMBER 17BPZR.53
SEPTEMBER 23, 2013
Wilki
RW
�tI` 1 t _+ '� ♦,,�yo:` �` B3ehupe'Ct
io
i ' J Kp�d97'JRd 14
1616
. S:• -'gyp:• 'e6r y , r i` i �� ,\ \ •- � '�.,' -�'\ `f; °\ 'J, ,`'y
4' -.._ _ .�. - - - -1.. `: � \/, �' � - ='a% i•" rat, '• /; ^Y'b%''�,'s<.;' �"'r:,a., ",,. _ ' . ,\
— t!/° •,V t • � C / % ' 'fi-'�`'�' - `: �3,::, ` F' ��4 k4�r: ±;.:., ' '.:,�^SF`t�•'�{ _ O j . I � ' �; `� �'" ABM
J
•4-"' '1 X40 .�j 4 % / , "•S: A °S w >r /` '' ",'�°t.',i / �; 't"','�,' ! i.'" , r
6 1 �� :�' � / `t• ��:,> >�y�,� s r-'`'t._ir`b,� \� >��r,.",_� tw Lam`. "�� "• #,,.;�,�_ � j 4
1 .k -Y'` � J / ��X� lY�•J.,i , :p`•• ,.:y,'r /'^"
/� 11 I _� -�• �i3 � r ';tl ..!�y ^'i'i„'!,y ' " ^'p ``-n Y "`, ���• ` "`'+^ -• ° =' '�� / "' '• '
y � I •'. +�, , ' � ; ,, .. : �� , r���•,,. � r °mac" >�».! _ .
,1 � :` �:;�- ,- _��`i<,.�,., "'' "�:> ads %r \� �< 1 -.. -I�r�•�`' ''
-c:" - Cola
- BEAUFORT 161:
N 682143.561 r•:v< :'- y
E 2672943.502 <r.:r.: ' .' •, ;r;y . , „H o
� N 35 -36 -12 -•� -- - ; �:; �•,�,� -�,' 7. �,' 4�+s.: �x��r. � n?'�•�'°u •.e„�..- I - .Y•'��' `_.i•'f.�� -�� >
W 7644
N 35.603214 "� - �,`,,t.s �•':. ,.;.., �:,� rf„ �;�.�, �`�'`'' _
i W 76.735940 - - -= 4 `' :',- ",..;;r ;ttttttF :r: ;,: _ �_° ' •- //
! ,•- �"'^:- 1 - '_ •'____ ___ l��l' �•� >.aR:`�i+7��: ix �..i.- �,��a�R� r.. s�:.'F`_�., - '1"1"ti .. - .. 1
_ i _ -._ i �` .�- _ ._. _ ,. •, _; .°'x,0.5' =, E _. :� ".`� ,'c,: 2" � � ` '•� ��
�, � %' _ _ -_ - =�r_- _,,..,•:•.,:i' ~�. °-�YZ`,f: ^. -; y � .z ' ems' Gj '+. 1
y -- , `,\ ... f:w : %j3Arv,: >,�4�,. ., �__k >•i �._ i,.,h >�?,�' -:,.h z4,�r .2�:'f�,.:s:'s -,. f _yfA�, "% � •%', ,
_ '" : ' :e5 ���'` �'.'7,La'yk"� "<f�:��,�'`,: ,s'r "z'�ii'ix <` ,: ��'°'iq�'�,.y` � >- •r::; - i
- " `- t' - ^- - - � 'i'` �`i '•�s.,Ji.c� 2ii`z ", "�� ,: a _ .y� �L!• �',^%+h , . �" �h['� -
1 _ __ 1 , { »,5.�: � , Y �5,.,,�; e , ��, �„ }, i ` �'.iz�"wt'; : <"�'.,l�ri,' %�.,<::. •c, „�'Fe, i' l .:,;.....�
- : { 1 i ' .Sit.'�,Yn'"4 i..3,. " , R'.u. n'.'T ,. � .'Y-„",. •'r• ' , �?i. @4:: �': , , . � i
�,wa � .,.4 ;. . ^i'. TEAS f- §', %;Yµ_, ^:^j�>. -. )iv' ✓/
t 1 '� , F�tr =tic, a?4w-��:� _x,;f: >S ' .*Sa''* ,,,".tea:•. 5: :1a;% ,fie ,
4 � 1' i��?<•, " ?�,. � "4, .i• "t� «. i•. �,, "rf,??.: ,'tY' ?Qy `�'�$..'~h, r` ,i3�;�4= .i-
} 4 � � j '•i .. >• -.:r� +,ate,.. \ �;~ 1 :` •'1?s�: r � `� :��;..< W ` � ,. .. �' -• ', .rr,:N"
J' 1 - 1 ••,,\ -1 - - i.. __�• "i' -- -� � __ r- N •i ,'1�2e��"M �: �yw.n,``x,S ^'S�L '=. h. :'j es• §X 1` '� \'" .�.�"Y ,i -�R -- •r1�,
i.
?:�.�
2,000 1,000 0 2,000 Feet

a 11
� r �y t • " "'• '-� '� �. _ � �.... �t,-.w "� �N o'er
O
O

8
0
Q
0
N
r
W }
Q
U
Q)
0

fAt—
Augusta fine sandy loam
Map Unit Setting
•
Elevation: 0 to 30 feet
•
Mean annual precipitation: 42 to 58 inches
•
Mean annual air temperature: 61 to 64 degrees F
•
Frost free perlod: 190 to 270 days
Map Unit Composition
•
Augusta, drained, and similar soils: 80 percent
•
Augusta, undrained, and similar soils: 5 percent
Minor components: 8 percent
Description of Augusta, Drained
}
Setting
? •
Landform: Flats on marine terraces, depressions on marine terraces
•
Down -slope shape: Linear
i •
Across -slope shape: Linear
I •
Parent material: Sandy and loamy fluviomarine deposits and /or marine deposits
Properties and qualities
•
Slope: 0 to 2 percent
•
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
•
Drainage class: Somewhat poorly drained
•
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high to high (0.57 to 1.98 in /hr)
•
Depth to water table: About 12 to 24 inches
•
Frequency of flooding: None
•
Frequency of ponding: None
•
Available water capacity: Moderate (about 8.0 inches)
Interpretive groups
•
Farmland classification: Prime farmland if drained
•
Land capability (nonirrigated): 2w

• Hydrologic Soil Group: B/D
Typical profile
• 0 to 5 inches: Fine sandy loam
• 5 to 23 inches: Loam
• 23 to 31 inches: Sandy loam
• 31 to 80 inches: Loamy sand
Description of Augusta, Undrained
Setting
• Landform: Flats on marine terraces, depressions on marine terraces
• Down -slope shape: Linear
• Across -slope shape: Linear
• Parent material: Sandy and loamy fluviomarine deposits and /or marine deposits
Properties and qualities
• Slope: 0 to 2 percent
• Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
• Drainage class: Somewhat poorly drained
• Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high to high (0.57 to 1.98 in /hr)
• Depth to water table: About 12 to 24 Inches
• Frequency of flooding: None
• Frequency of ponding: None
• Available water capacity: Moderate (about 8.0 Inches)
Interpretive groups
• Farmland classification: Prime farmland if drained
• Land capability (nonirrigated): 3w
• Hydrologic Soil Group: B/D
Typical profile
• 0 to 5 inches: Fine sandy loam
• 5 to 23 inches: Loam
• 23 to 31 inches: Sandy loam
• 31 to 80 inches: Loamy sand
To— Tomotley fine sandy loam
Map Unit Setting
• Elevation: 0 to 30 feet
• Mean annual precipitation: 42 to 58 inches
• Mean annual air temperature: 61 to 64 degrees F
• Frost free period: 190 to 270 days
Map Unit Composition
• Tomotley, drained, and similar soils: 75 percent
• Tomotley, undrained, and similar soils: 10 percent
• Minor components: 6 percent
Description of Tomotley, Drained
Setting
• Landform: Depressions on stream terraces, flats on marine terraces
• Down -slope shape: Linear
• Across -slope shape: Linear
• Parent material: Sandy and loamy fluviomarine deposits and /or marine deposits
Properties and qualities
• Slope: 0 to 2 percent
• Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
• Drainage class: Poorly drained
• Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high to high (0.20 to 1.98 in /hr)
• Depth to water table: About 0 to 12 inches

• Frequency of flooding: None
• Frequency of ponding: None
• Available water capacity: Moderate (about 8.1 inches)
Interpretive groups
• Farmland classification: Prime farmland if drained
• Land capability (nonirrigated): 3w
• Hydrologic Soil Group: B/D
Typical profile
• 0 to 7Inches: Fine sandy loam
• 7 to 11 inches: Fine sandy loam
0 11 to 42 inches: Sandy clay loam
0 42 to 50 inches: Sandy loam
• 50 to 80 inches: Loamy sand
Description of Tomotley, Undrained
Setting
• Landform: Depressions on stream terraces, fiats on marine terraces
• Down -slope shape: Linear
• Across -slope shape: Linear
• Parent material: Sandy and loamy fluviomarine deposits and /or marine deposits
Properties and qualities
• Slope: 0 to 2 percent
• Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
• Drainage class: Poorly drained
• Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high to high (0.20 to 1.98 in /hr)
• Depth to water table: About 0 to 12 inches
• Frequency of flooding: None
• Frequency of ponding: None
• Available water capacity. Moderate (about 8.1 inches)
Interpretive groups
• Farmland classification: Prime farmland if drained
• Land capability (nonirrigated): 4w
• Hydrologic Soil Group: B/D
Typical profile
• 0 to 7 inches: Fine sandy loam
• 7 to 12 Inches: Fine sandy loam
• 12 to 42 inches: Sandy clay loam
• 42 to 50 Inches: Sandy loam
• 50 to 80 inches: Loamy sand

Project Tracking No. (Internal Use)
13 -10 -0014
HISTORIC ARCHICTECTURE AND LANDSCAPES
NO HISTORIC PROPERTIES PRESENT OR AFFECTED FORM
i1irill This form only pertains to Historic Architecture and Landscapes for this project. It
is not valid for Archaeological Resources. You must consult separately with the
Archaeology Group.
PROJECT INFORMATION
Project No:
County:
Beaufort
WBS No.:
117BP.2.R.53
Document
Type:
MCC
Fed Aid No:
Funding:
State U Federal
Federal
Permit(s):
Z Yes El No
Permit
Type(s):
Project Description:
Replace Bridge No 161 on SR 1616 (Terra Ceia Rd) over Broad Creek Canal.
SUMMARY OF HISTORIC ARCHICTECTURE AND LANDSCAPES REVIEW
® There are no National Register - listed or Study Listed properties within the project's area of
potential effects.
® There are no properties less than fifty years old which are considered to meet Criteria
Consideration G within the project's area of potential effects.
❑ There are no properties within the project's area of potential effects.
® There are properties over fifty years old within the area of potential effects, but they do not
meet the criteria for listing on the National Register.
® There are no historic properties present or affected by this project. (Attach any notes or
documents as needed.)
Date of field visit: n/a
Description of review activities, results, and conclusions:
On October 8, 2012 a review HPOGIS website revealed that the Hartford Harris Gravehouse (BF
1288), a study - listed resource is near the project area. The parcel that the gravehouse is located
on is within the APE of this bridge; however the gravehouse site is 300 feet outside of the APE
for the bridge replacement project. There are no other structures or landscape features associated
with the gravehouse which are within the APE. The current timber deck bridge is being replaced
by a box culvert and will not have any effect on the historic resource. No other historic properties
are present in APE.
Historic Architecture and Iandreapes NO HISTORIC PROPER77ES PRESENT OR AFFECTED form for Minor Transportation Projects as Qualified to the 2007
Programmatic Agreement.
Page 1 of 3

SUPPORT DOCUMENTATION
®Map(s) Previous Survey Info. - ®Photos ®Correspondence ❑Design Plans
FINDING BY NCDOT ARCHITECTURAL HISTORIAN
Historic Architecture and Landscapes — NO HISTORIC PROPERTIES PRESENT OF AFFECTED
NCDOT Architectural Historian 1 Date
Historic Architecture and Landscapes NO HISTORIC PROPERTIES PRESENT OR AFFECTED form for Minor Transportation Projects at Qualyted in the 2007
Prog —maticAgreement.
Page 2 of 3

S
W
N�
1►
+A�
a
u
O
c
0
N F-.
a�
o, Vl
u�
00
p U
a sa
Co
rt
C_ m
O �
A m
V
L
oa
Z .T.
Historic Architecture and Landscapes NO HISTORIC PROPER77fiS PRESENT OR AFFECT l DJorm jor Minor Transportation Projects as Qualified in the 2007
Programmatic Agreement.
Page 3 of 3
L
i
V
V
rt
YJ
t

` y
1 -
4b
rI r •
ck Y�..
a
1
r

.2 t • +' vLVLVL7Il�HL ours v t r
Hoke I 7 °45; Pike Road
*37-30P 342 E. '313 344 315 4730'
pia+ 64
0
SOUTH
aylord
Y y !
O � -
BM " 1
"A
z
:
F0 T
Pinetown
u -
a
X ±yYiY »•�B OISIIIfl •'�
I. Z;,; lc =ti • ..
LA
• �:
l S 1
39 - —
S
15
N
f! J-
:
�t
I
7

4" 3(r " 33e
1 .
u
_. —_2_� ooa FEE Moke_ 1'41 1
1614,
v
* f
„4Y
a_
....... ...,. ^ '514 �.
I
A f N T E i G
«�� t W
_...Gsiylood�
Terra Ceia
in
3941
SOUTH'_ ^ s.— _ . r a j a
3 _
h
a
a
cxx74A 3.
- — i
f'
I•
s+:. -'- ��Sr•:- '=�`�: a 3., �.: c
• iRl)
35,
Pike Road
Y-Av
Pantego
l
1
<
i
F \
t
u
_. —_2_� ooa FEE Moke_ 1'41 1
1614,
v
* f
„4Y
a_
....... ...,. ^ '514 �.
I
A f N T E i G
«�� t W
_...Gsiylood�
Terra Ceia
in
3941
SOUTH'_ ^ s.— _ . r a j a
3 _
h
a
a
cxx74A 3.
- — i
f'
I•
s+:. -'- ��Sr•:- '=�`�: a 3., �.: c
• iRl)
35,
Pike Road
Y-Av
Pantego

Beaufort 161
BEA UFORT 161
SR 1616, TERRA CEIA TRACK ROAD
BROAD CREEK CANAL
PANTEGO USGS QUAD MAP
-
AND SHEET 9 OF THE SOIL SURVEY
OF BEAUFORT COUNTY
FIRM PANEL 6678 J
MAP NUMBER 3720667800J
+,
PAMLICO 03020104
BROAD CREEK CANAL C;Sw,NSW
TAR - PAMLICO BASIN
»_
WBS ELEMENT NUMBER 17BP.2.R.53
SEPTEMBER 23, 2013
;,fN
a , I \ . AA
. I '�J.^- � 1 i r� � • /: ! / is�' 6 rRN
ol 7! ! tdS 16
1 L- t ;<. '+Rafn 1 S' -.. i• ___ t� ��• � _� mot_
C018 R
- BEAUFORT 161
N 682143.561
' E 2672943.502
N 35 -36 -12 �� "` - %!`', �� pr,,d GroaIk Ch
76 -44 -09
W
t ,
N 35.603214
1 W 76.735940 /
_- _
ol
ti
2,000 1,000 0 2,000 Feet

/, F. I-
00
IN
4�1
�-m
O LJL,
to
0
m 144"l,
LL
IMA I
T 4'
1 14
do,
or
ru
lw= lot is
v to
it
f fl
iIf!
0
14,
tz,-1
A-40

N`�a " a
a
S
�>N °ofl ads
Gp
r
se- Dti
Q
fa
b }o
v
d
0
Tf
C`
cNp
tV
r
p1
O
S
t>
RIMLL
W m
fY
J
t7i
LLLL
K
lap
Da
c
y�
6
a
i
IL'
O
Il--
$t O
aaS Q
W
m
d
3
wg
U
m � ci
4Ln
F .1 s i
.0 % u.
m
�+ 3 A •
o �
o
:g m
C
4
a
v
m

j
w1i
I
r
t.
fill
o )

WWI

. . k
Project Tracking No (Internal Use)
REQUEST FOR CULTURAL
RESOURCES REVIEW FORM
MEMORANDUM TO: Drew Joyner, Human Environment Section
1598 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699 -1598
Send Electronic Submittals to: [e-mail] OCT 2 12013
ATTENTION: Matt Wilkerson, Archaeology Supervisor Lt�VV
Mary Pope Furr, Historic Architecture & Landsca (1j fj(a
FROM: BILL BRAME JR'(�
DIVISION 2 ENVIRONMENTAL SPECIALIST SEP 2 3 2013
DATE: SEPTEMBER 23, 2013
��� +w... �w���sww�f •YMR
PRn_IFCT INFORMATION
Project No:
Beaufort 161
Detour
County:
Beaufort
WBS No
17BP.2.R.53
left onto SR 1623, a left onto
Document
Minimum Criteria Sheet
SR 1621, a left onto SR 1613
Type:
Fey! Aid No:
N/A
60'
Funding:
® State Federal
USGS Quad
Pantego
ROW:
Project
October 2013
Name:
Proposed X-
N/A
Schedule:
Project Description:
Beaufort 161, Replace existing 52'
long by 25.4' wide timber bridge with a proposed 34' by 10'-
8" aluminum box culvert. SR 1616
Terra Ceia Rd over Broad Creek Canal.
** Work cannot begin until a charge number is proviaea tnat can oe omea to oy stari in the human
Environment Section.
DESIGN INFORMATION
Project Length:
250' from each end of
Detour
Traveling E. on SR 1616 take
existing bridge
Route:
left onto SR 1623, a left onto
SR 1621, a left onto SR 1613
to SR 1616.
Existing ROW:
60'
Proposed
60'
ROW:
Existing X-
N/A
Proposed X-
N/A
section:
section:
Structure to be
Timber Floor on Timber
Structure
1960
Replaced:
Joists
Build Date:
Additional Design Information:

r �Y
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
PATRICK L. MC'CRORY ANI I IONY J. 'TA'I'.n
GONTRNOR SFURVIARY
February 27. 2013
Mr. Travis Wilson. Highway Pr(liect Coordinator
North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission
Habitat Conservation Program - Division ofhtland Fisheries
1721 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 2 7699 -1 72 1
RE: Request for comments on NCDOT County Bridge to Pipe Project
Beaufort Co. Bridge No. 161 over Broad Creek Canal on SR 1616
Dear Mr. Wilson:
The North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) is preparing the planning and
environmental studies for the above referenced bridge to pipe project.
'fhe purpose of this letter is to solicit your input concerning the potential impact of the propoised
projects upon social. economic. demographic. land use and environmental conditions near the
project site. A vicinity map is attached illustrating the location of the proiect.
Please note there will be no formal interagency scoping meeting for the project. This letter
constitutes solicitation for scoping comments. To allow us to folly evaluate the impacts of the
proposed projects, please respond in writing by March 22. 2013. to the address below concerning
any beneficial or adverse impacts of the proposed projects relating to the interest of your agency.
If you have any questions or comments concerning the prgiect, please contact me at 439 -2830.
Thank you for your assistance.
Sincerely.
l ;c• i�Z
Maria A. Rogerson, P. E.
Division Bridge Program Manager
MAR
Attachment
MAILING ADDRESS TELEPHONE: [phone] LOCATION:
NC t)PPARTMENTOF TRWSPORT.\71oN FAX: [phone] PA(T01.0%1 1161I AY
D1 VISION OF 1.11611WAYS
DIVISION TWO � , GREENYII.I.I.. NC
P.O. nrn 1587
GIUTNY1t I.E. NC 27835
- I
y

l
Rogerson, Maria A
From: Wilson, Travis W.
Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2013 ].2:06 PM
To: Rogerson, Maria A
Subject: Bridge scoping
Maria in response to your scoping comment request and as discussed during our meeting on the 181h, for Pitt Co Bridge
No. 211, Pitt Co. Bridge No. 223, and Beaufort Co. Bridge No. 161. WRC does not have any specific concerns with the
replacement of these structures.
NOTE: NEW PHONE NUMBER AND MAILING ADDRESS
Travis W. Wilson
Eastern Region Highway Project Coordinator
Habitat Conservation Program
NC Wildlife Resources Commission
1718 Hwy 56 West
Creedmoor, NC 27522
Phone: 919 - 707 -0370
Fax: 919 - 528 -2524
Travis.Wilson @ncwildlife.ort?
Email car, esponoence to and fiom th;s vender is subject to the N.C. Public Recoros Late and may hP disclosed to third parties.

Brame, Bill Jr:
From: Rogerson, Maria A
Sent: Friday, November 01, 2013 1:25 PM
To: Brame, Bill Jr.
Subject: FW: Beaufort Bridge #161 on SR1616
191
From: Lane, Stephen
Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2013 4:28 PM
To: Rogerson, Maria A
Cc: Johnson, Jay B; Steffens, Tom; Ward, Garcy
Subject: Beaufort Bridge #161 on SR1616
Hi Maria,
As per your request for scoping comments in your letter to me dated February 27, 2013, 1 have visited Bridge #161 on
SR1616 over a UT to Broad Creek Canal in Beaufort County. I have determined that the bridge replacement project is
not located within one of the Division of Coastal Management's AECs, therefore, a CAMA permit will not be required for
its replacement. Please let me know if I can be of any further assistance with this project.
Sincerely,
Stephen Lane
Coastal Management Representative
* * * ** Note new E -mail Address is: Stephen.Lane @ncdenr.gov * * * **
E -mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North Carolina Public
Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.
Email correspondence to and from this sender is subject to the N.C. Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.
1

O
(D
D
c
v
v
W
W
0
Z
-0
;u
0
Z-0
2
an
d
(D
0
o
'p
d_
w
A
d
W
o
0
(D
0 oc
;
d
O
7
c
CD
d
�_
°
°
O
`S
o
(D
d
nOi
7
,_,�
A
to
s
7
3
o
-
<'
z
d
0
W
(D
,
o
",
y
,dn.
>
>
N
H
a
O7
o
D
3
°
01
<
d
(D
F
d
m
d
N
V
ci
o
N
S
n
n
N
IV
�•
CL
a
(o
D
d
o
v
m
O.
a
CJ1
w
?
3
o
p
7
d
_
7
A
N
N
O(n N�
O
N
d
V
:03 V
_F n° W
O
(SD O
d
-0
N
n
d
7
fD
S
7
N
0
j Co
W
co
N
a : K)
S
N
-
N
N
-O
3
d
C7
3
O
N
O
7
A<
W
�O
O d
__ X 0
(D O
0
N
.T7
Z3 d [T
(D (D C '�
7
T
S
00
(D
CD
00
S
7
�
CD U1
w
C
d
7
L
co
Z N
V
N
7
W
N O �. `2
CL (D - Co
D
"O
O
C
(D
7
O�
O
N
O a
7 S CD ? d
wr
(D
n
O
�`
O
7
(D
O
7
(D
Z
d
O
V
co
W
0
L'
(i
(O'D d d o
o
°'
<
Oi Z
C7
o
c
�
mCP700
N°
d
w
('
7
7
CD
O n
(D
m
7
(D O w O A O)
N
7
C
FD.
N
.O.
n ° v
7
0
CD
3
c
O:�OO<
n
O
7
° N
f
c
3
(Ni (b
(D S =
O
0
N
d
0
O
X� c m
`°
a
°
0
3
0
O
-a 3 m
a
j
m
y
.-. CD =.
N C d
w
0
�'
Qo
O
7
D7
=r
0 0
(p
g n o. 3 CD
N
(o
CD
°
r
2 d
° 3 (o
S O O co CD
0
N
d
n
7 0)
o_
m S
N d X
lwJ(
N
Q
v
(D
Z D F y
N 0)) F C 0
d
a
y
D m '�
n
y
N
c
°'
g� m
m yam
0
0
(D
o n0 D».
(D
M
o z3
Z
C1
Ci
Ci
"O
n
d d n r
03
in
CN'7
* D y (D
w ��
a
=
�
D
r•
3 -0 °
N fD 7 fl)
o
o
O
A
n
n
m -1
CL
N 3= V
d
°
N
O
(D
N
p
�:
m Z (p y
0 -{
ox CD
n
.
c
7
N
C
7
N
n
O
'6
rdi
an d J
(D
(D
W
O
N
d N
x
° °m
x.
o
o
a..
(D
C) -.
CD CD ��
3
d
CO
m
S
o
O.
m
CAD
3 to CD
7
S
d
N
°-'•
..
(7D
..
N
..
CD Z J
O ON
(°
70
(D
C
O
CD
T
d
(D
%� Cn W
C A
=
� n
d
<
Cl)
W
a
O
- S. w
-{
CD
O y (D
n
0
.(7
p
a
A
S N M
W
7
C S
n d O
N
d
O
(D
N
d
3
W
A
S
A
Z O
O Cf
(D
CD
C7
7
O
m
3
a j CD
(D
N
N
D.
d
N
a
'A
w
m
v O
(D
N
O
C O
d
N
O
3
V
w
O N
CO
CL 0
C)
C N
d
N
7
(o
O
n
(D Nom
Q.
Q
m
° o n
(D
m
x
m
g CD N O
n.
N
rN►
O
p) `
M
S
C
v
Z
3 'R
,
C:
°+
O
n (O
d
CD
CD
N
_
N
-
j
d
N O N
S O
N
N
A
-.
n
�
�'
m °
�
d
-
d
to
fD Q 3
n
O
m
S
(D
N 0,
N N
d
.�
n
o)
3 3
(D
N
d p O
n
Z
O�
m (D q
:
w
a 3 W
Ol c
(D
N
O 7 O
N N Q
O
Mp
(D
4
z n
? §
O O (D
7 CD
CL ;r
As
N
;
4
S N

> m J
=
»
7 I{
a
{{
Ti:
_ =
a
Ir
zr
\ \3
n(D
gn
\
;o §
��a_
\ }\
000
\
/y/
CL C)
3 £
k
@ƒ�
} \
a
IM »
/
3
)
f/0
M,
cn
(
#
_(
(D
CD
�g
\\\
\
�(
\
�\
3 -
2
co
ƒ
° �
°k(
\ -
aQ-
»o#E
-
a
=
(D
\\
®
[
;
\°
[
j \
j
ƒ
J 7
(
§
�
_
\}
{ 7
f)
-
tea >
)
/
k M 2
■
m
E
,
a
m
/
Cn
g m E -0
§
«
_0
,
�§ \
j
\
f
(C
\
/kg\
-
o
x m§
jr
m-
I9
�,m
7 ■-U i
;
\
§
i§
§kd (
��30
#
UT
0
z g
\�
% Cl)
§/\
}
(D
«
.
zk�
))k
(
&\
s
su
Ea
CD
z\/
»
�-
2
o
� /
z

O
m
D
z
r
o
U)
w
C
�
A
O
C
_
x
m
m
o
_
�
N
m
D
m
N
m
O D
O
�l O
w
rn
w
O Z
O
O ;
OD
X
N
Z �
�
O
�
m
o
m
m
�D
D
D D
(� m
-{ m
r
N
Nw
N
O
m
m
m
C
D
r
_
r
x
mo
D
n
N
J
r
m
x o
0
0
>
� >
N
z
m
N
O
i
x z
G1
N
co
m
s o
n
r
m
z
W
r
C
C7 �
m
m
m
m�
M
z
N

O
m
D
Z
z
r
O
T
�O
OZ
m
N
O
CD
1m
Z
C-mi
D
r
D
v
Z
70 D
cn
o
0
0 x
-20 m
Z
Z
N
C
n
m
n
-I
cn
c
E
D
W
y
O O
Cn
m
C
O
< m
��
0 71
m�
Z
O
N
°
N O
Z
x
= Z
OW
C/)
u
T
X
D A
Cn D
rn
�_
O
Z

)
«
f `
e
0/
\
\ \
§
0
\
_
/
_D
/
%
D 3
/
§
$ ƒ
\
/7&2]
,J\
\)
$
a
\
ƒ \_ /3
/
{
/
o
\0/5<
�CL
\
\m
ƒ
/
2
N
/
m
Q-
C)
\ƒ
}5(./
2
�CL (C)
D
®
;
\k0
k
73
:
q
)' 2
$
\
�
� _0
Q
0
`
/
�7 /I
\
] = m E
»am
§]7§
m
(Dcn
H7 /2\
ma)
5§ \®
�_\Q3
°m/
°
ƒ2{
3 R

Beaufort 161
—
d
BEAUFORT 161
SR 1616, TERRA CEIA TRACK ROAD
BROAD CREEK CANAL
PANTEGO USGS QUAD MAP
AND SHEET 9 OF THE SOIL SURVEY
OF BEAUFORT COUNTY
FIRM PANEL 6678 J
MAP NUMBER 3720667800)
PAMLICO 03020104
BROAD CREEK CANAL C;Sw,NSW
TAR— PAMLICO BASIN
WBS ELEMENT NUMBER 17BP.2.R.53
SEPTEMBER 23, 2013
0/v
as
S1162i
1635
Old 97 "SW _ -
1616
_ - --
H�
-
Q' 1A
may �a5�1
O
�
�1
•
hd
m
O.
Terra Ceia RdS 1616
BEAUFORT 161
N 682143.561
E 2672943.502
N 35 -36 -12
W 76 -44 -09
N 35.603214
W 76.735940
J~
Van WYk Rd
2,000 1,000
0 2,000 Feet

LW ee
be
Z Z
0
LLJ
70- 9: R
Li
E E
j&,mvtw owl Jcd lfwww' -N 'a f Mu -N —1 li'W
MUD avovo
.......... ...... ........................................................................................... ...... . .... .
o.
0
R:b!
zo
at:
In
oa�
zjn
Op
x ci�
RO-
1�
................................................. ...................................................................................................................................................
QTR
A A 71
4i
S:
O;
QTR

uW ZQ Qz
j
i
I
N
1
t
F
o i
OS ,;z a .
oW U z [zl g <?! 3
o
3z -
`a
g oW {{a 1-4
0
N
O1
NO
V(O
0 N
a0ca u �n
N i <
h h H
L wUU #
¢t < <
<o «o N p
UI�L2
Q t2
Q
Z: � o
2 Gm
.yo Z� /
A
II U II 4 II II 11 11 4 II II
Q Q W
M _
Lu F.RW� ¢
SOW
Z N
LL•N C
WW222
Ci U,
Ny m
y a�
0000 tr
.O N
2
NN�WWW W W¢O
O
VVVaiaaa o 3¢
Jill W Jill
= yy yy
4 n °[K Z CCW
8 DD
mm 2 mfm
O
cr
WW W W
W
ZZ
O
00 ONO W
SI = e
V
I
x
1
I
O
II F
W o aW<
JW
p
w <
CL
Lu,
LLJ
�*
—�—
0
LL
z i 1 t
o
O
°°
LLLL
VIVI jli I K O yy
+
N
9
1
NN Z I!! o
Jill
m L< n
N
I
C7
V)
I
f
yy Ian I I O yy
aQ.d N
N I M
00 ? a' a I I m
KW I �I
J W
1
O
WW
WW -- I-L o-r ��• � -
OD e .
cc
N I ^N
WW i: R�I WW
Z z ,a' Z
�I 00
1
00 W
1
�
O
I �! a
\
w O j
iS -.
NI II
---
'
5
K CAN N- z
i�
•
\ fo• ro
zo 00
-
I
6o•In- 1no-
WUO-DAU
-191no
qn\
v4v l0 :00 :11
£IOZ /II/6

9/11/2013
11:00:23 AM
... \VOVVIOI
-fl
U_ II- UUI_
—U I
�► -1,Fx-
11, II
��
e - - - -- T .0.3
I I,- G, .0/
_ I
N
O m
I 4
I
.04 t
I �
I
I
NN n m' NN
Z� III L.'r ZZ
cc I.,�I v. ��
I t;ltl CT
�.
✓! III
I' �A
FJO O.'.
Ili I
O
' _
,J�II
nN
�LA
D
N� nn I nn
�„ rn
II II a II ds� � II II
s
I
N
I
1
I
NP Ot 2 NV
wrs
1 I
• ' I I � I I >bi
Z
`-
': -
ro
- y
1 l OZ
-1 C G - _ - r 1.-- CIO
_
+
-$
OD
r
o���'hl
gp
r
qo
H
(�
-
y�
�
}i'm, N
1
zz o0
'+
O
I
mm
N— i 2 •III ; N�
CT
i
rn mm
\� -'ysoa
3 N
D
00
rn II II
a gggwwlO ROi �i
�. N
COW
pI-q
Irk Q
r V1
N V T T - T
Np
rti_r10C2
a �>J A�2
c n = o '➢' `� R'
_
""
022 2 O
�a��
/ 1 omAz
1�bZf1 f�,•7 I•. n. m
'
4 II II II 4 II 11 II II II II
/ 1._ ` Wcc m� o
c,-
Z -0
osoa
or
na�a
� D MOOD
is lam•
r<0
`v
lo ol
1� Vr
N
i
' O
O
u p
0
D
O
ro r �3
r y Z
"

9/11/2013
11:00:42 AM
,I
I .OQ :02 I
I
V I'
2 T,
m
vt I
� � r
m O m
_
1
pow 04
0
-'
Op >Z OZ>Z
Dmz- �A1 '
O
O
i
<Zr4z I 1 <?m-Zj
o v
I _
� iI' I' al � Art'm➢
m
I
Z �a I J m>Z O
ILj�
Z O Z
! I
�A Y
DD -� i �� V„ II ..•x. DD -�
-- ---
I
mr
r 1
O
I
II II :Eg I n
II II �NN
qu�� III
Iv
r
2
ooz ooZ
°
rOh O -f-DA
N
IIp m s IID `
N
I
8
A, _ _ ° p rn
o o I Ih� � _D' o N
ON G m DT
_�.. ._
p
O 0
i
I ItzI T Z
D1 3
O--
``
OZ
s D
�ZZ S
FA x
f
..I, t�
1p
NpO mmmm mmmm
y l5 �OoZ>Z ZA zm
zmz p mzmz
Q
Z
i
P Z m A
z v zv
>nzy N
r)�z'D
�,
II II �v'A II II it �N
O
�pzp m �f ��z
�
TTOp
oo mmaa s
"1
2�(2�
p OOO �i
i pO A�
Pn IS
�Z n, �o irl r"
�rn ~`Cm
"_ o
T
N
C
It 0 II 11 II 11 It It It :1 It
�0
--
O
nDnO N Z1711�
yam m� � Or10D
4 oo mood
M VI f/1 fJ1 fn fA
TK = arc
D A
I VH
� mM
00
m
N
O
qq O
IL
t,is 4 m0i"ll
..
u zz wz
o 0
A
x
ZO
a ZP m
An A Z
fA O

9/11/2013
11:01:01 AM
I
I -- --
/
m
In
h A O m
1 I:
A- A4
r rl,
m I m
3 n
0 >Z O =
+
Z ZDZ
Z Z i•
O
{?mom ;,.. r <?m?
TAn1 A TTr�
Z y}yj
Z Z
1
i
A °� n
�
I
1
33cZi_ _ « `I 3�GZi3
DD
O
1
qq it III
^' I °
ooZX11
I; °Z
TTDn O
T
o
'
51 27
T
BZ
Bi
tt
In
O
O
F z>
y ac
C n
II
I
Rlr
12
v m m
15 �O�oozjz
1 DZNZ
Dm?m
I
I
O
P -1 NNOI<TT I
AyjT Z 11114�'I r pTr�
xz ;oz
r "r) `II Y nnZ> N
'1
Q.
I
I
II II�NIA yl �I - II II�N�
o
aoZ
TToo
NO ^11 �i� TTNO
n goo
41 gM
� �rnmmap)66
-0 -0
1'r n n
:InD�
�N oN o0
rn �2 m
>
ryl
< mrnny�mn2
N °
y�26
II II II It II II II II II II II
o>
>� A� i r No m>
V1 V1 !n V1 to H
m
I
' O
O
o
D
t - O
p
o
,
Z 0