20180117 Ver 1_MP Addendum_2021_20211112

Mitigation Project Information Upload
ID#* 20180117 Version* 1
.........................................................................................................................................................................
Select Reviewer:*
Erin Davis
Initial Review Completed Date 11/12/2021
Mitigation Project Submittal - 11/12/2021
......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
Is this a Prospectus,Technical Proposal or a New Site?* 0 Yes ® No
Type of Mitigation Project:*
Stream Wetlands Buffer Nutrient Offset
(Select all that apply)
Project Contact Information
Contact Name:* Email Address:*
Paul Wiesner [e-mail]
Project Information
......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
ID#:* 20180117 Version:• * 1
Existing ID# Existing Version
Project Type: • DMS Mitigation Bank
Project Name: Wyant Lands Mitigation Site
County: Lincoln
Document Information
......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
Mitigation Document Type:*
Mitigation Plans
File Upload: Wyant Lands_100595_MP Addendum_2021.pdf 13.24MB
Please upload only one PDF of the complete file that needs to be submitted...
Signature
......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
Print Name:* Paul Wiesner
Signature:*

s t d s ' a 4 d'SfAS,
4% a A
µ
r.
MITIGATION PLAN WYANT LANDS MITIGATION SITE
Lincoln County, NC
ADDENDUM NCDEQ Contract No. 7244
Wyant Lands DMS ID No. 100067
Revised Draft for DMS November 10, 2021 Addendum DMS ID No. 100595
Catawba River Basin
HUC 03050102
(03050103 Expanded Service Area)
USACE Action ID No. SAW-2017-02609
DWR Project No. 2018-0177
PREPARED FOR:
NC Department of Environmental Quality
Division of Mitigation Services
1652 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1652
PREPARED BY:
WILDLANI
Wildlands Engineering, Inc.
167-B Haywood Rd
Asheville, NC 28806
Phone: [phone]

MITIGATION PLAN ADDENDUM
WYANT LANDS MITIGATION SITE
Lincoln County, NC
NCDEQ Contract No. 7244
DMS ID No. 100595
Catawba River Basin
HUC 0305102
(03050103 Expanded Service Area)
USACE Action ID No. SAW-2017-02609
DWR Project No. 18-0177
PREPARED FOR:
NC Department of Environmental Quality
Division of Mitigation Services
1652 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1652
PREPARED BY:
INF
W I LDLANDS
ENGINEvAiNG
Wildlands Engineering, Inc.
167-B Haywood Rd
Asheville, NC 28806
Phone: [phone]
This Mitigation Plan addendum has been written in conformance with the requirements of the
following:
• Federal rule for compensatory mitigation project sites as described in the Federal Register Title
33 Navigation and Navigable Waters Volume 3 Chapter 2 Section §332.8 paragraphs (c)(2)
through (c)(14).
• NCDEQ Division of Mitigation Services In-Lieu Fee Instrument signed and dated July 28, 2010.
These documents govern DMS operations and procedures for the delivery of compensatory mitigation.
Contributing Addendum Staff:
Eric Neuhaus, PE, Project Manager
Shawn Wilkerson, Principal in Charge
Jordan Hessler, Design and Permitting Lead
Brandon Romeo, Lead Scientist
Emily Reinicker, PE, CFM - Quality Assurance

ROY COOPER ':
Governor ;•
ELIZABETH S.BISER .f
Seereta `k cuLivo.
TIM BAUMGARTNER NORTH CAROLINA
Director Environmental Quality
October 22, 2021
Mr. Eric Neuhaus, PE
Wildlands Engineering, Inc.
167-B Haywood Road
Asheville, NC 28806
Subject: Draft As-Built Baseline Monitoring Report(MYO) and Record Drawings &
Mitigation Plan Addendum for the
Wyant Lands Mitigation Site
Catawba River Basin—CU# 03050102 —Lincoln County
DMS Project ID No. 100067
Contract# 7244
Mr. Neuhaus:
On October 13, 2021, the NCDEQ — Division of Mitigation Services (DMS) received the Draft
As-Built Baseline Monitoring Report(MYO), Record Drawings & Mitigation Plan Addendum for
the Wyant Lands Mitigation site from Wildlands Engineering, Inc.
The MY0 report establishes the as-built conditions at the project site. Anticipated mitigation on
the site (MYO) includes 6,238 linear feet of stream restoration; 376 linear feet of stream
enhancement(Level 1); 926 linear feet of stream enhancement(Level 2); 11.0 acres of wetland re-
establishment; and 3.2 acres of wetland rehabilitation for a total of 6,863.700 Stream Mitigation
Units (SMUs) & 13.1 Wetland Mitigation Units (WMUs). The following are our comments on
the draft documents:
As-Built Baseline Monitoring Report(MYO)
General: In the report text, please briefly reference and discuss the 404 project permit condition
#3 and as-built wetland grading. Please reference Record Drawing sheet 2.1 and any additional
sheets necessary to address the USACE issued permit condition in the report text.
General: If available, please provide the soil boring profiles for the monitoring well gauges
installed on the site. This can be included as a separate report appendix.
Section 2.4 Wetlands: Please note that the IRT has indicated that if soil temperature and bud
burst data are utilized to amend the start of the growing season, project data will also need to be
utilized to adjust the end of the growing season. DMS recommends utilizing the North Carolina
WETS table for the project growing season as established in the IRT approved mitigation plan.
Section 3.1.1 Dimension: Table 18 (not Table 19) established the # of cross sections in the IRT
approved mitigation plan. Please update the text accordingly.
_.,0---------A
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality I Division of Mitigation Services
,,,,)D
2l7 West Jones Street 1652 Mail Service Center Raleigh,North Carolina 27699 1652
-rt a Em.H.tdil".,"" e'd 919.707.8976

Section 3.1.4 Photo Reference Points: Based on IRT concerns, feedback and the 10/18/21 IRT
site visit, DMS recommends additional photo points at all project crossing areas (upstream and
downstream); particularly the crossing beneath Wyant Road. These additional photo points can
be added in the MY1 (2021) report.
5.1.12 Fencing: In the report text, please also note the type of fencing installed to exclude
livestock from the project conservation easement. If multiple fencing types were utilized, please
describe in the report text.
Table 1: The As-Built acreage for Wetland Rehabilitation appears to be incorrect (typo). The
Wetland Rehabilitation acreage should be 3.200 acres. Please review, confirm and update the
document accordingly.
Table 7: Cross-section#13 is noted as a pool in Table 7 but is noted as a riffle in the cross-section
plots. This is also the cross-section that was relocated in August 2021. Please review Table 7 and
the cross-section plots and update as necessary to confirm that they are consistent.
Record Drawings:
• Sheet 1.1 notes; "Pools have filled with offsite sediment. Expect sediment to clear as
channel stabilizes." Please also discuss this in the report text.
MY0 -Digital Support File Comments:
• Please include the sealed standalone as-built .DWG file and a .PDF file (Kee Surveying)
with the final digital submission.
• Please submit the mobile vegetation plots as polygons rather than points.
• Wetland Rehabilitation (OID 6), Wetland_Re_Establishment (OID 2), and
Wetland Re Establishement (OID 4) overlap with one another. Also,
Wetland_Rehabilitation (OID 8) and Wetland Re Establishement (OID 4) overlap with
one another. Please review and correct these wetland asset overlaps.
• Wetland_Rehabilitation(OID 1) and Wetland_Re_Establishment(OID 1) are both outside
of the easement. Please exclude these features from the submission.
• UT3_R3_Lower overlaps and extends past the confluence with Wyant Creek R2. Please
use snapping to correct this issue.
• Please confirm that the feature with Name UT3_R3 is in fact UT2_R3 and update the Name
attribute if this is true.
• The Shape Area of the merged features included in Wetland_Re_Establishment is equal
to 11.213 ac, compared to the 11.0 ac reported in the asset table. After correcting the
North Carolina Department of Environmental QualSty I Division of Mitigation Services
`J��IIn 21T West Jones Street 11652 Mail Service Center I Raleigh,North Carolina 27699-1652
el 919.707.8976

overlaps outlined above, please revise these features so that they reflect the reported as-
built condition.
Mitigation Plan Addendum:
• DMS recommends calling the document a Mitigation Plan Addendum on the cover and
remainder of the document and attachments.
• Executive Summary & Section 1.0: The addendum notes; "In March 2021, Wildlands
completed construction of the initial Wyant Lands Mitigation Site(Site)which involved the
restoration and enhancement of approximately 7,558 existing linear feet (LF) of Wyant
Creek and three unnamed tributaries (UT1 UT3), as well as the re-establishment and
rehabilitation of14.8 acres ofwetlands." The MY0 report notes a total of 7,540 linear feet
(LF)of perennial and intermittent stream a total of 14.2 acres of restored riparian wetlands.
Please review and update the addendum so the document is consistent with the MY0 report
and record drawings.
• Section 5.3 Amendment Existing Hydrology: If available, please provide the soil boring
profiles for the four(4)pre-construction monitoring well gauges installed on the site. This
can be included as a separate appendix.
• Table 11: Recommend updating the "Mitigation Plan Footage/ Acreage" cell to
"Mitigation Plan Addendum Footage/Acreage" to avoid confusion.
• Table 11: Please QA/QC and update the Total Stream Mitigation Credit cell to 231.600
SMUs. Please QA/QC and update the Total Wetland Mitigation credit cell to 4.563
WMUs. The most recent DMS mitigation plan asset table should be utilized to avoid
rounding errors that conflict with the DMS asset database (CRM).
• Table 12: Please QA/QC and update the Total Stream Mitigation Credit cell to 7,095.300
SMUs. Please QA/QC and update the Total Wetland Mitigation credit cell to 17.663
WMUs. The most recent DMS mitigation plan asset table should be utilized to avoid
rounding errors that conflict with the DMS asset database (CRM).
• Per the recent IRT site visit on 10/18/2021, please be sure to describe the existing and
proposed vegetation in the addendum text and tables.
• Per the recent IRT site visit on 10/18/2021, please provide a LIDAR map of the additional
wetland area and the initial soil evaluation from the project mitigation plan (S&EC (Kevin
Martin; LSS)). These documents should be referenced in the addendum text as necessary.
• Please reference and update the addendum as necessary to reflect IRT conversations and
meeting notes from the recent 10/18/2021 site visit.
North Carolina Department of Environmental QualSty I Division of Mitigation Services
`J��IIn 21T West Jones Street 11652 Mail Service Center I Raleigh,North Carolina 27699-1652
el 919.707.8976

Mitigation Plan Addendum -Digital Support File Comments:
• The Amendment_Proposed_Stream intersects with the previously submitted mitigation
plan feature for UT1 Reach 1/2 and moves past the confluence. Please use snapping to
connect the endpoint of Ammendment Proposed Stream to UT1 Reach 1/2.
• There are multiple overlapping features both within the
Ammendment Proposed Wetlands shapefile and between the
Ammendment Proposed Wetlands shapefile and the previously submitted mitigation plan
wetland asset features. Please edit to ensure there are no overlaps, and update Table 12 in
the Mitigation Plan Amendment document accordingly.
• Combining the previously submitted mitigation plan wetland re-establishment feature with
the Ammendment Proposed Wetlands features for wetland re-establishment produces a
total area of 14.95 ac, compared to 14.42 in Table 12 of the Mitigation Plan Amendment.
Once overlapping areas are removed, please verify that the reported areas reflect the
combined area of the previously submitted mitigation plan wetland asset features and the
proposed amendment features.
• DMS has attached a shapefile with the overlaps for the addendum features referenced in
the comments above.
At your earliest convenience, please provide a written response letter addressing the DMS
comments provided and the revised/ updated electronic As-Built Baseline Monitoring Report
(MYO), Record Drawings& Mitigation Plan Addendum. Please also provide the revised/updated
final digital support files. The comment response letter should be included in the revised
report after the report cover.
If you have any questions, please contact me at any time at [phone] or email me at
[e-mail]
Sincerely,
Paul Wiesner
Western Regional Supervisor
NCDEQ—Division of Mitigation Services
5 Ravenscroft Dr., Suite 102
Asheville, NC 28801
[phone] Mobile
cc: file
.DE Narth Carolina Department of Environmental Q}zality I gDivision of Mitigation Services
,�J� 217 West Jones Street 11652 Mail Service Center I Raleigh,North Carolina 27699-1652
.....ACON.Lkeparixeset 6_6 �� 919.707.8976

bilkil/111111r
WILDLANDS
ENGINEERING
MEMORANDUM
TO: Paul Wiesner, NC DMS
FROM: Eric Neuhaus, PE
DATE: November 10, 2021
RE: Wyant Lands Mitigation Site Addendum
Lincoln County, NC
Catawba River Basin 03050102
Response to NCDMS Addendum Comments
This memo documents NCDMS's review comments of the Mitigation Plan Addendum for the Wyant
Lands Mitigation Site (in italics) received from Paul Wiesner on 8/22/2021,the project team's responses,
and where the revisions have been included in the associated reports.
Mitigation Plan Addendum:
o General Note: One additional table (Table 9)was added to the mitigation plan
addendum based on NCDMS comment. Subsequently,the following revisions were
made to the Table numbers:
Original Addendum Submittal Revised Addendum Submittal
Table 9: Summary of Performance Standards Table 10: Summary of Performance Standards
Table 10: Monitoring Components Table 11: Monitoring Components
Table 11:Amendment Asset Table Table 12:Addendum Asset Table
Table 12: Revised Asset Table for the Amended Table 13: Revised Asset Table for the Amended
Wyant Lands Mitigation Site (Original plus Wyant Lands Mitigation Site (Original plus
Amendment) Addendum)
• DMS recommends calling the document a Mitigation Plan Addendum on the cover and remainder of
the document and attachments.
o The language in the mitigation plan and supporting documents was updated to replace
amendment with addendum.
• Executive Summary&Section 1.0:The addendum notes; "In March 2021, Wildlands completed
construction of the initial Wyant Lands Mitigation Site(Site) which involved the restoration and
enhancement of approximately 7,558 existing linear feet(LF)of Wyant Creek and three unnamed
tributaries(UT1 —UT3), as well as the re-establishment and rehabilitation of 14.8 acres of wetlands."
The MYO report notes a total of 7,540 linear feet(LF)of perennial and intermittent stream a total of
14.2 acres of restored riparian wetlands. Please review and update the addendum so the document
is consistent with the MYO report and record drawings.

o Linear footages and acreages within the executive summary and introduction within the
addendum were revised to be consistent with the MY0 report, record drawings, and
revisions to proposed wetland areas to remove overlaps per NCDMS comment.
• Section 5.3 Amendment Existing Hydrology:If available,please provide the soil boring profiles for
the four(4)pre-construction monitoring well gauges installed on the site. This can be included as a
separate appendix.
o The four pre-construction monitoring well gage soil boring profiles are provided in
Appendix 6A.
• Table 11:Recommend updating the "Mitigation Plan Footage/Acreage"cell to "Mitigation Plan
Addendum Footage/Acreage"to avoid confusion.
o Table 11 was updated with the suggested language.
• Table 11:Please QA/QC and update the Total Stream Mitigation Credit cell to 231.600 SMUs. Please
QA/QC and update the Total Wetland Mitigation credit cell to 4.563 WMUs. The most recent DMS
mitigation plan asset table should be utilized to avoid rounding errors that conflict with the DMS
asset database(CRM).
o Tables 12 and 13 (formerly Tables 11 and 12)were updated to the asset table format
published to the NCDMS website on 10/20/2021 within the mitigation plan addendum
and within the associated digital submittal files. Stream lengths, wetland acreages, and
associated credit values were revised based on as-built data and/or based on the
revision to remove overlapping areas from the as-built and proposed wetland re-
establishment, rehabilitation, and creation areas based on NCDMS comment.
• Table 12:Please QA/QC and update the Total Stream Mitigation Credit cell to 7,095.300 SMUs.
Please QA/QC and update the Total Wetland Mitigation credit cell to 17.663 WMUs. The most recent
DMS mitigation plan asset table should be utilized to avoid rounding errors that conflict with the
DMS asset database(CRM).
o Tables 12 and 13 (formerly Tables 11 and 12)were updated to the asset table format
published to the NCDMS website on 10/20/2021 within the mitigation plan addendum
and within the associated digital submittal files. Stream lengths, wetland acreages, and
associated credit values were revised based on as-built data and/or based on the
revision to remove overlapping areas from the as-built and proposed wetland re-
establishment, rehabilitation, and creation areas based on NCDMS comment.
• Per the recent IRT site visit on 10/18/2021,please be sure to describe the existing and proposed
vegetation in the addendum text and tables.
o Section 5.5—Addendum Vegetation and Planting Plan was added to the mitigation plan
addendum. Additionally, Table 9 was added to the mitigation plan addendum with
proposed panting.
2

• Per the recent IRT site visit on 10/18/2021,please provide a LIDAR map of the additional wetland
area and the initial soil evaluation from the project mitigation plan (S&EC(Kevin Martin;LSS)). These
documents should be referenced in the addendum text as necessary.
o A LiDAR map of the whole site is now provided with the figures in the mitigation plan
addendum.
• Please reference and update the addendum as necessary to reflect IRT conversations and meeting
notes from the recent 10/18/2021 site visit.
o The mitigation plan addendum was updated based on conversations with the IRT at the
10/18/2021 site visit.
o A LIDAR map (Figure 13) was added to the mitigation plan addendum per IRT request.
o All previous Licensed Soil Scientist information was included with the mitigation plan
addendum per IRT request.
Mitigation Plan Addendum- Digital Support File Comments:
• The Amendment_Proposed Stream intersects with the previously submitted mitigation plan feature
for UT1 Reach 1/2 and moves past the confluence. Please use snapping to connect the endpoint of
Ammendment Proposed Stream to UT1 Reach 1/2.
o The Amendment_Proposed_Stream shapefile was updated to correct the issues with
the proposed and existing features extending beyond confluences.
• There are multiple overlapping features both within the Ammendment Proposed Wetlands
shapefile and between the Ammendment_Proposed Wetlands shapefile and the previously
submitted mitigation plan wetland asset features. Please edit to ensure there are no overlaps, and
update Table 12 in the Mitigation Plan Amendment document accordingly.
o The overlapping features in the addendum mitigation plan wetland asset features were
corrected and Table 12 and Table 13 within the mitigation plan addendum were revised
to correct overlapping area errors.
• Combining the previously submitted mitigation plan wetland re-establishment feature with the
Ammendment_Proposed Wetlands features for wetland re-establishment produces a total area
14.95 ac, compared to 14.42 in Table 12 of the Mitigation Plan Amendment. Once overlapping areas
are removed, please verify that the reported areas reflect the combined area of the previously
submitted mitigation plan wetland asset features and the proposed amendment features.
o The overlapping features in the addendum mitigation plan wetland asset features were
corrected and Table 12 and Table 13 (formerly Tables 11 and 12) within the mitigation
plan addendum were revised to correct overlapping area errors.
• DMS has attached a shapefile with the overlaps for the addendum features referenced in the
comments above.
o Wildlands appreciates NCDMS providing the overlapping shapefile. Overlapping features
within the digital files were corrected and a revised digital package is included with this
comment response memorandum.
3

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Wildlands Engineering was contracted by the North Carolina Department of Mitigation Services (DMS)
to provide stream and wetland credits in the Catawba River Basin HUC 03050103. In March 2021,
Wildlands completed construction of the initial Wyant Lands Mitigation Site (Site)which involved the
restoration and enhancement of approximately 7,540 linear feet (LF) of Wyant Creek and three
unnamed tributaries (UT1—UT3), as well as the re-establishment and rehabilitation of approximately
14.2 acres of wetlands. Restoration of these streams and adjacent wetlands was proposed to provide
6,863.7 stream credits and 13.1 wetland credits within the approved mitigation plan dated April 2020.
A contract addendum and revised mitigation approach was proposed by Wildlands and was approved by
DMS in July 2021.The addendum proposes to restore approximately 396 LF of UT2 Reach 1 which was
proposed as stream enhancement II within the approved mitigation plan.Additionally, the addendum
proposes to restore and create an additional 5.742 acres of wetland features at the Site.This mitigation
plan addendum is proposing an additional 231.600 SMUs and 4.513 WMUs based on the proposed work
at the Site. Upon addendum approval by the North Carolina Interagency Review Team (IRT),total project
assets for the Site will increase to 7,090.667 SMUs and 17.608 WMUs for the entire project.
Wyant Lands Mitigation Addendum Page 1
DMS ID No. 100595

TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.0 Introduction 3
2.0 Addendum Area Baseline and Existing Conditions 3
2.1 Project Description 3
2.2 Addendum Existing Conditions -Wetlands 3
2.2.1 Addendum Area Jurisdictional Wetlands 3
2.3 Addendum Existing Conditions—Streams 5
2.3.1 UT2 Reach 1 5
2.4 Addendum Area Soils 6
3.0 Addendum Regulatory Considerations 6
3.1 Biological and Cultural Resources 7
3.2 Addendum FEMA Floodplain Compliance and Hydrologic Trespass 7
3.3 Addendum 401/404 7
4.0 Mitigation Site Goals and Objectives 8
5.0 Design Approach and Mitigation Work Plan 9
5.1 Design Channel Morphological Parameters 9
5.2 Addendum Wetland Design 10
5.3 Addendum Existing Hydrology 10
5.4 Proposed Best Management Practices (BMPs) 11
5.5 Addendum Vegetation and Planting Plan 11
6.0 Addendum Performance Standards 12
7.0 Addendum Monitoring Plan 13
7.1 Addendum Monitoring Components 13
8.0 Long-Term Management Plan 14
9.0 Adaptive Management Plan 15
10.0 Determination of Credits 15
11.0 References 17
MITIGATION PLAN ADDENDUM FIGURES
Figure 2A Addendum Site Map
Figure 5A Addendum Soils Map
Figure 6.1A Addendum Existing Conditions Map— East Side
Figure 6.2A Addendum Existing Conditions Map—West Side
Figure 7A Addendum FEMA Floodplain Map
Figure 10.1A Addendum Concept Design Map—East Side
Figure 10.2A Addendum Concept Design Map—West Side
Figure 11A Addendum Monitoring Plan
Figure 13 Wyant Lands LIDAR
ADDENDUM APPENDICES
Appendix 3A Addendum PJD& NCWAM Forms
Appendix 6A Addendum Supplementary Design Info
Appendix 8A Addendum Preliminary Design Plans
Wyant Lands Mitigation Addendum Page 2
DMS ID No. 100595

1.0 Introduction
Wildlands Engineering Inc., (Wildlands) is proposing an expansion of project assets at the Wyant Lands
Mitigation Site (Site).The initial Site mitigation plan received IRT and U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
(USACE) approval on December 20, 2019.The original project involved the restoration and
enhancement of approximately 7,540 linear feet of Wyant Creek and three unnamed tributaries (UT1—
UT3), as well as the re-establishment and rehabilitation of 14.147 acres of wetlands. Restoration of
these streams and adjacent wetlands area were approved to provide 6,863.7 stream credits and 13.1
wetland credits within the Catawba basin in the original mitigation plan.The original Site is protected by
a 41.5-acre conservation easement.The proposed mitigation addendum area will include an additional
5.9-acre conservation easement which will abut the existing recorded conservation easement north of
the previously restored wetland area (Figure 2A).The amended project area will provide an additional
5.741 acres of wetland re-establishment, rehabilitation, and creation. In addition to the expanded
wetland area,this addendum proposes a revision of mitigation approach along UT2 Reach 1 from
enhancement II to restoration. Work as part of this mitigation addendum is proposed to provide an
additional 231.600 stream credits and 4.513 wetland credits. Project information for the proposed
addendum is shown in Table 1.
Table 1: Project Attribute Table Part 1
Amended Project Information
Project Name Wyant Lands Mitigation Site
County Lincoln
Project Area(acres) 41.5 (original); 6.0(addendum);47.5 (total)
Project Coordinates(latitude and longitude) 35°32'2.13"N 81° 18'52.82"W
Planted Acreage(acres of woody stems planted) 37.8(original); 7.2(addendum);45.0(total)
L.0 Addendum Area Baseline and Existing Conditions
2.1 Project Description
Construction and planting of the approved mitigation Site assets were completed in spring of 2021 and
the as-built and baseline monitoring report was submitted to DMS in October 2021.This mitigation plan
addendum includes additional conservation easement area to include additional wetlands in the pasture
area north of the original wetland restoration area.Wetlands will be restored and created by removing
the crowned field material, removing side cast berms in the agricultural pasture and filling existing
ditches within the proposed wetland areas. Additionally, UT2 Reach 1 is proposed for restoration with
an appropriate pattern, profile, and dimension. A best management practice (BMP)will be installed
along the reach to stabilize a recently developed water quality stressor from the adjacent agricultural
pasture. A new conservation easement containing the amended wetland area that abuts the original
recorded conservation easement will be acquired as part of the project addendum. UT2 Reach 1 is
currently within the existing recorded conservation easement and no additional easement will be
required based on the revised stream mitigation approach.
2.2 Addendum Existing Conditions-Wetlands
2.2.1 Addendum Area Jurisdictional Wetlands
Wildlands previously delineated wetland waters of the United States within the original project areas
and a Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination (PJD) was issued in August 2019.The issued PJD and
associated NCDWR Stream Classification Forms and USACE Wetland Determination Data Sheets were
Wyant Lands Mitigation Addendum Page 3
DMS ID No. 100595

included in Appendix 3 of the approved mitigation plan. An addendum to the existing PJD was submitted
in August 2021 and included additional assessment area based on this proposed project expansion.
Wildlands received approval of the amended PJD on September 15th, 2021.The amended PJD submittal
and associated approval is included in Appendix 3A of this mitigation plan addendum.The amended PJD
includes an additional four jurisdictional wetland features (Q-T) and one additional open water feature
(Open Water 2) documented within the expanded wetland assessment area which can be seen in Figure
6.1A. On-site wetland features exhibit prolonged saturation within the upper 12 inches of the soil
profile, hydrophytic vegetation, and a depleted matrix or darkened surface horizons. Common
vegetation species present in wetlands include creeping buttercup (Ranunculus repens), marsh
dewflower(Murdannia keisak), and soft rush (Juncus effuses).
Wetlands L, M, and N are associated with UT1 Reach 1 and discussed in the original mitigation plan.
Existing wetlands delineated as part of the project expansion were evaluated using the North Carolina
Wetland Assessment Method (NCWAM)to generate function ratings for specific wetland types. Using
the NCWAM dichotomous key and best professional judgement, existing wetlands in the addendum
area were classified based on the reference wetland type as if the area was not disturbed;therefore,
wetlands were classified as bottomland hardwood forests.The NCWAM ratings of wetlands in the
addendum area is low.The wetlands scored as low functioning systems when compared to reference
conditions as a result of impairments to all three of the primary functions (hydrology, water quality, and
habitat). Hydrology and water quality functions generally received low scores due to ditching and berms
that reduce surface and subsurface water storage and limit hydrologic connectivity with streams.
Habitat quality received low scores due to vegetation composition and structure; most on-site wetlands
are poorly connected to adjacent natural habitats and are actively managed for grazing. NCWAM field
assessment forms and the rating calculator outputs for additional jurisdictional wetlands within the
expanded project area are included in Appendix 4A.Table 2 below outlines the additional jurisdictional
wetlands and open water features identified within the proposed project expansion.
Table 2:Addendum Area Jurisdictional Wetland Features
Wetland Summary Information
Parameter Wetland L Wetland M Wetland N Wetland Q
Size of Wetland within CE(acres) <0.01 0.01 0.04 0.315
Wetland Type(NCWAM Headwater Headwater Headwater Bottomland
Classification) Forest Forest Forest
Hardwood
Forest
Mapped Soil Series Pacolet Pacolet Pacolet Chewacla/
Pacolet
Somewhat
poorly
Drainage Class Well Drained
Well drained Well drained drained/
Well Drained
Soil Hydric Status No No No No
Source of Hydrology Groundwater Groundwater Groundwater Groundwater
Discharge Discharge Discharge Discharge
Restoration or enhancement Enhancement Enhancement Enhancement Restoration
method(hydrologic,vegetative,etc.)
Wyant Lands Mitigation Addendum Page 4
DMS ID No. 100595

Wetland Summary Information
Parameter Wetland R Wetland S Wetland T Open Water 2
Size of Wetland within CE(acres) 0.358 0.208 0.160 0.307
Wetland Type(NCWAM Bottomland Bottomland Bottomland
Classification) Hardwood Hardwood Hardwood N/A(Canal)
Forest Forest Forest
Mapped Soil Series Chewacla Chewacla Chewacla Chewacla
Somewhat Somewhat Somewhat Somewhat
Drainage Class Poorly Poorly Poorly poorly
Drained Drained Drained drained
Soil Hydric Status No No No No
Source of Hydrology Groundwater Groundwater Groundwater Groundwater
Discharge Discharge Discharge Discharge
Restoration or enhancement
method(hydrologic,vegetative,etc.) Restoration Restoration Restoration Restoration
2.3 Addendum Existing Conditions—Streams
The Site included four perennial streams within the approved mitigation plan (Wyant Creek, UT1, UT2,
and UT3) and NC DWR Stream Identification Forms (Version 4.11) were included in previously submitted
Appendix 4. During the initial project evaluation, UT2 was determined to be a perennial stream with a
total score of 38. No major watershed or hydrologic changes have occurred upstream of the project, so
no update was required to the jurisdictional status of UT2. No additional stream resources are included
as part of this mitigation plan addendum.The current condition of UT2 Reach 1 is described in detail
below.Table 3 provides a summary of the existing stream condition.The existing condition alignment
and cross-section data collection locations are illustrated in Figure 6.2A.
2.3.1 UT2 Reach 1 - gt
s� �UT2 Reach 1 is located downstream from an existing farm
pond.The farm pond was fenced for cattle exclusion as part
of the original project. UT2 Reach 1 flows through a ,
" •„,r4 . z Y
moderately sloped and moderately confined alluvial valley
until intersecting with an adjacent parcel owned by4tt ::.
Rutherford Electric Membership Cooperation (REMCO).The 4
reach was previously in active cattle pasture with evidence -
of cattle activityincludingfeces and trampling, as well as •
h 3_.;,
some cattle runs and wallow areas. When the stream was Eroding Outside Bend Along UT2 Reach 1
initially evaluated in October 2017, the primary stream
stressors were invasive vegetation and cattle activity.An assessment of the stream conducted in April
2019 indicated the stream had a moderately stable dimension, moderate bedform diversity, and existing
riffle-pool habitat. However, during the period from April 2019 and August 2021, the Site received
multiple large rain events, and this reach degraded rapidly. Runoff from an upgradient field initiated a
large headcut in the right floodplain which deposited sediment within the stream channel and impacted
bedform. Invasive vegetation stems increased within the floodplain and are outcompeting native
vegetation. Fine sediment loads increased from active bank erosion and the adjacent floodplain
headcut. Common vegetation found throughout the reach include red maple (Acer rubrum), black
Wyant Lands Mitigation Addendum Page 5
tAtifi DMS ID No. 100595

willow (Salix nigra), Chinese privet (Ligustrum sinense), and chickweed (Stellaria media).Table 3 below
shows a summary of channel information.
Table 3: UT2 Reach 1 Existing Stream Summary
Parameter UT2 Reach 1
Existing Length of Reach(LF) 413
Valley Confinement(confined, moderately confined,unconfined) Moderately Confined
Drainage Area (acres) 77
Perennial, Intermittent, Ephemeral P
NCDWR Water Quality Classification WS-IV
Stream Classification C4
Evolutionary Trend(Simon) II/III
Downcutting
FEMA Classification N/A
2.4 Addendum Area Soils
Soil mapping units are based on the U.S. Department of Agriculture(USDA) Natural Resource Conservation
Service (NRCS) Soil Survey of Lincoln County. Soils within the addendum areas are mapped as Chewacla
loam and Pacolet sandy clay loam.These soils are described below in Table 4.A soils map of the addendum
areas is provided in Figure 5A.
Table 4:Addendum Area Soils
Soil Name Description
Chewacla soils are found in Piedmont river valleys.They are somewhat poorly drained
Chewacla loam alluvial soils with a seasonal high water table of 6-24 inches.This soil unit is frequently
flooded or ponded.
Pacolet sandy Pacolet soils are found in hillslopes and ridges with slopes from 0-80%.They are well-
clay loam drained soils weathered from granite and gneiss. Depth to water table is typically greater
than 80 inches.
Source: Lincoln County Web Soil Survey
Addendum Regulatory Considerations
Table 5, below, is a summary of regulatory considerations for the Site.These considerations are
explained in more detail in Sections 6.1-6.2.
Table 5: Regulatory Considerations
Parameters Applicable? Resolved? Supporting Docs?
Water of the United States-Section 404 Yes No PCN1
Water of the United States-Section 401 Yes No PCN1
Endangered Species Act Yes Yes Appendix 53
Historic Preservation Act Yes Yes Appendix 53
Coastal Zone Management Act No N/A N/A
FEMA Floodplain Compliance Yes No N/A
Essential Fisheries Habitat No N/A N/A
1. PCN to be amended as part of project addendum upon preliminary mitigation plan addendum approval.
Wyant Lands Mitigation Addendum Page 6
DMS ID No. 100595

2. An updated floodplain development permit application will be submitted to the local floodplain administrator.
3. See approved mitigation plan
3.1 Biological and Cultural Resources
A Categorical Exclusion for the Wyant Lands Mitigation Site was approved by the Federal Highway
Administration (FHWA) on October 19, 2018.This document included investigation into the presence of
threatened and endangered species on Site protected under The Endangered Species Act of 1973, as
well as any historical resources protected under The National Historic Preservation Act of 1966.The
conclusion for cultural resources per the Categorical Exclusion research and response by the State
Historic Preservation Office is that there are no historic resources that would be affected by this project.
The signed Categorical Exclusion checklist is found in Appendix 5 of the approved mitigation plan.
3.2 Addendum FEMA Floodplain Compliance and Hydrologic Trespass
A Lincoln County floodplain development permit was obtained for the original portions of the Wyant
Lands Mitigation Site in November 2019 in compliance with FEMA floodplain and Lincoln County
ordinances. Work in the addendum area also occurs in the Special Flood Hazard Area (Zone AE) of Pott
Creek mapped on Lincoln County Flood Insurance Rate Map Panel 3604.An amended floodplain
development permit has been requested and a revised hydraulic modeling study has been developed
that includes the addendum area grading.
The proposed design associated with the addendum area has limited risk of potential hydrologic
trespass.The addendum wetland area is graded to provide positive drainage toward the recorded
conservation easement. UT2 Reach 1 has sufficient gradient that the design will not result in backwater
effects upstream of the work area.
3.3 Addendum 401/404
Wildlands incorporated existing stream and wetland stability and/or function into design approaches for
avoidance and minimization measures. Wetlands within the amended conservation easement or limits
of disturbance will be denoted in the final construction plans including the Erosion and Sediment Control
sheets. Proposed protection including safety fencing of these areas where possible will be shown in the
Detail plan sheets as well as specified within the project manual. Floodplain grading will result in
temporary impacts to most existing wetlands while channel realignment and filling open waters will
result in permanent impacts. Wildlands expects a net gain of wetland area and function as a result of
floodplain grading and filling existing open waters.Table 6 estimates the anticipated impacts to
wetlands and open waters.The Pre-Construction Notification, including these data, will be provided
with the final addendum mitigation plan.
Table 6:Amended Area Estimated Impacts to Wetlands and Open Waters
Permanent(P)Impact Temporary(T)Impact
Jurisdictional Classification Acreage
Feature g Type of Activity Impact Area Type of Activity Impact Area
(acres) (acres)
Bottomland
Wetland L Hardwood 0.010 - - Stabilization 0.010
Forest
Bottomland Conversion to Floodplain
Wetland M Hardwood 0.010 0.005 0.005
Forest stream resource Grading
Wyant Lands Mitigation Addendum Page 7
DMS ID No.TBD

Permanent(P)Impact Temporary(T)Impact
Jurisdictional
Feature Classification Acreage Impact Area Impact Area
Type of Activity Type of Activity
(acres) (acres)
Bottomland Conversion to Floodplain
Wetland N Hardwood 0.040 0.010 0.030
Forest stream resource Grading
Headwater Wetland
Wetland Q Forest 0.315 - - Restoration 0.315
Grading
Headwater Wetland
Wetland R 0.358 - - Restoration 0.358
Forest
Grading
Headwater Wetland
Wetland S 0.208 - - Restoration 0.208
Forest
Grading
Bottomland Wetland
Wetland T Hardwood 0.160 - - Restoration 0.160
Forest Grading
Open Water 2 Canal 0.307 Fill 0.307
Total P Impact 0.322 Total T Impact 1.086
Mitigation Site Goals and Objectives
The proposed addendum will improve stream and buffer functions via stream restoration, stabilization
of water quality stressors,treatment of invasive species, and riparian buffer re-vegetation. Wetland
function will be improved at the Site via a reduction in surface drainage features resulting in hydrologic
uplift.The project goals and related objectives and outcomes are described in Table 7. Project goals are
desired project outcomes and are verifiable through measurement and/or visual assessment. Objectives
are activities that will result in the accomplishment of goals.The project will be monitored after
construction to evaluate performance as described in Section 6.0 of this report.
Table 7: Mitigation Goals and Objectives
Goal Objective Expected Outcomes
Exclude livestock Install fencing around conservation easements or Reduce and control sediment inputs; Reduce
from wetland areas. remove cattle from easements adjacent to cattle and manage nutrient inputs; Improve
pastures. agricultural management activities.
Restore UT2 Reach 1 to establish a stable pattern,
Improve the dimension,and profile.Stabilize stream bed and Reduce and control sediment inputs;
stability of stream banks using bank vegetation, bank revetments,and Contribute to protection,or improvement,
channels. in-stream structures to protect the restored
of a Water Supply and Nutrient-Sensitive
channel. Water.
Install habitat features such as constructed riffles,
Improve instream cover logs,and brush toes into UT2 Reach 1.Add Improve aquatic communities in project
habitat. woody materials to channel bed. Construct pools of streams.
varying depth.
Restore wetland Restore and enhance riparian wetlands filling Improve terrestrial habitat; Contribute to
hydrology,soils,and existing ditches, removing berm material over relic protection of or improvement of a Water
plant communities. hydric soils,and planting native wetland species. Supply and Nutrient-Sensitive Water.
Wyant Lands Mitigation Addendum Page 8
DMS ID No. 100595

Goal Objective Expected Outcomes
Reduce and control sediment inputs; Reduce
Restore and and manage nutrient inputs; Provide a
enhance native Plant native tree species in riparian zone were canopy to shade streams and reduce
currently insufficient.Treat invasive species within
floodplain thermal loadings; Contribute to protection,
vegetation. the floodplain of UT2 Reach 1. or improvement,of a Water Supply and
Nutrient-Sensitive Water.
Reduce and control sediment inputs;
Reduce point source
water quality Stabilize the active headcut in the right floodplain Contribute to protection,or improvement,
stressors.
of UT2 Reach 1. of a Water Supply and Nutrient-Sensitive
Water.
Permanently
protect the project Ensure that development and agricultural
Site from harmful Establish conservation easements on the Site. uses that would damage the site or reduce
the benefits of the project are prevented.
uses.
5.0 Design Approach and Mitigation Work Plan
5.1 Design Channel Morphological Parameters
Cross-sectional area, pattern, and profile design parameters and selected and width were based on the
design discharge, stable bank slopes, and width to depth ratios similar to reference conditions. Key
morphological parameters for the UT2 Reach 1 are listed in Table 8. UT2 Reach 1 is proposed for stream
restoration and will be constructed as a Priority 1 restoration.The Priority 1 approach will raise the
stream bed so that the bank full elevation will concede with the existing floodplain.The cross-section
will be constructed to convey the design discharge. UT2 Reach 1 is designed as a Rosgen Bc-type channel
that will meander within the existing narrow valley.The reach is actively eroding from bank erosion and
a floodplain headcut. Bank grading,the installation of in-stream structures,that of invasive species, and
planting to the existing riparian buffer will be performed as part of the proposed restoration.
Table 8:Summary of Morphological Parameters for UT2
Existing Parameters Reference Parameters Proposed Parameters
Parameter Pilot
Magnolia
UT2 Reach 1 Mountain UT2 Reach 1
Tributary
Tributary
Contributing Drainage Area(sq. mi.) 0.2 0.31 0.27 0.2
Channel/Reach Classification C4b B4c B4 C4b
Design Discharge Width(ft) 8.3 15.6 8.6 9.3
Design Discharge Depth(ft) 0.6 1.0 0.7 0.7
Design Discharge Area(ft2) 5.0 16.0 6.0 6.8
Design Discharge Velocity(ft/s) 3.4 4.0 5.3 4.0
Design Discharge(cfs) 16.8 64.0 32.0 26.0
Water Surface Slope(ft/ft) 0.0167 0.0163 0.0378 0.019
Sinuosity 1.24 1.26 1.05 1.1
Width/Depth Ratio 13.8 15.2 12.5 13.0
Bank Height Ratio 2.0 1.6 1.0 1.0-1.1
Entrenchment Ratio 2.4 1.9 1.5 1.4-5.0
Wyant Lands Mitigation Addendum Page 9
DMS ID No. 100595

5.2 Addendum Wetland Design
The proposed wetland design includes the
Area Proposed for Wetland Restoration
re-establishment, rehabilitation, and
creation of a Piedmont bottomland forested
r 'r M f
wetland system.The proposed wetland areas ;.. '
are within the broad floodplain of Pott Creek
and are currently managed as agricultural
pasture used for cattle grazing and/or hay
production. Wildlands evaluated existing
conditions within the proposed wetland
areas to understand existing and potential
hydric soils, current surface drainage
features, existing vegetation, and the
potential for increases in hydrology based on
the proposed Site design.
Proposed wetland areas are currently ditched with three swales and two main perimeter ditches.The
fields are currently in pasture grasses and cattle grazing is the intended future use of the fields if they
are not added to the mitigation project. Figure 10.1A shows approximate areas of proposed wetland
approach including creation, rehabilitation, and re-establishment. Areas proposed for wetland re-
habilitation are currently jurisdictional areas which are impaired by agricultural manipulation and
drainage. Areas of wetland re-establishment have been floodplain riparian wetlands prior to agricultural
manipulation and the installation of drainage features. Similarly, areas of wetland creation are also
believed to have been floodplain riparian wetlands prior to agricultural manipulation, however drainage
features and field crowning has resulted in deep strata of overburden (typically greater than or equal to
12")which will be removed as part of the wetland development. Based on the depth of grading these
areas and lack of current or relic hydric indicators,these areas are propose wetland creation.
Soils within the northern fields are mapped as Chewacla loam.The soils within this area were evaluated
by Wildland personnel in March 2021. Eleven soil borings were taken throughout the proposed wetland
mitigation area and soils were evaluated for hydric indicators as well as potential hydric development.
Generally, soils within low, wet swales have developed current hydric indicators including low chromas
and redox concentrations occurring as pore linings within the top 10" of the soil surface. Soils outside of
low, wet swales, and particularly within crowned areas, exhibited higher chroma within the first 12"
with lower chroma and/or reduced soil features beyond depths of 12". Results from Wildlands' soils
investigation are included in Appendix 6A.
The approach within the amended wetland mitigation area will be to remove the current overburden
from the crowned fields and fill the existing drainage features to restore a natural wetland hydrologic
regime. Pasture grasses will be graded or treated for removal, and the area will be roughened to retain
surface water and increase retention times.A conservation easement will be recorded and will connect
to the existing conservation easement, expanding the floodplain riparian area being protected in
perpetuity.The wetland restoration area will be planted in woody vegetation consistent with a
bottomland hardwood forested wetland system. Fencing will be installed around the additional
conservation easement or cattle will be removed from the easement to prevent any future cattle access.
5.3 Addendum Existing Hydrology
Four groundwater monitoring gauges were installed in the amended wetland area on June 23, 2021
(Appendix 6A).The location of the existing groundwater gauges is shown in Figure 6.1A.The four
groundwater gauges were placed in transects to evaluate the groundwater elevations across the existing
Wyant Lands Mitigation Addendum Page 10
DMS ID No. 100595

agricultural area proposed for wetland crediting. Growing season dates were defined as March 27 to
November 6 (224 days) by the Lincolnton 4W North Carolina WETS table for 50%probability of soil
temperatures greater than 28 degrees Fahrenheit.
Groundwater gauge 102 malfunctioned and did not collect data during the June 23 to September 15
period. The data collected from the remaining three groundwater gauges suggest the wetland areas are
drained by the existing ditch networks.The groundwater levels quickly increase during rain events and
rapidly recede after rain events.The gauges continue to slowly receding overtime until the next rain
event.The average percent consecutive days above 12-inches of soil saturated was 2%for Ground water
gage 101, 103, and 104 the three addendum groundwater gauges located within the proposed re-
establishment area. Gauge data supports the design approach of filling existing ditches to raise
hydrology within the addendum wetland area.
5.4 Proposed Best Management Practices(BMPs)
In addition to the proposed stream design outlined in Section 4.1, one BMP is proposed in the right
floodplain of UT2 Reach 1 as shown in Figure 10.2A.The proposed BMP will be designed as a step-pool
stormwater conveyance (SPSC) consisting of short riffles, rock steps, and pools designed to stabilize the
existing headcut.The BMP is intended to address adjacent water quality stressors and reduce sediment
inputs from adjacent agricultural practices. Maintenance is not anticipated for the proposed BMP. A
basic detail is shown in Sheet 5.6 of the design plans included in Appendix 8A. Specific design
dimensions will be finalized prior to project construction.
5.5 Addendum Vegetation and Planting Plan
The riparian buffer and most wetland areas will be planted with bare root seedlings. Species chosen to be
planted within wetland areas were selected based on community types as well as their ability to handle
wetter ground conditions based on standing water and high groundwater levels observed in wetland areas
at the Site. The stream banks will be planted with live stakes and the channel toe will be planted with
multiple herbaceous species. Permanent herbaceous seed will be spread on streambanks, floodplain
areas,and disturbed areas within the project easement. Bare root seedlings and live stakes will be planted
in the dormant season between November 15 and March 15. Figure 10A illustrates the proposed planting
zones throughout the site. Species chosen for the planting plan are listed on Table 9 below and on sheet
4.0 of the preliminary plans located in appendix A.
Table 9: Planting List
Species Common Name Wetland Indicator
Riparian Planting Zone
Alnus serrulata Tag Alder OBL
Carpinus caroliniana American Hornbeam FAC
Liriodendron tulipifera Tulip Poplar FACU
Platanus occidentalis Sycamore FACW
Betula nigra River Birch FACW
Populus deltoides Eastern Cottonwood FAC
Diospyros virginiana Persimmon FAC
Quercus nigra Water Oak FACW
Quercus phellos Willow Oak FAC
Quercus michauxii Swamp Chestnut Oak FACW
Wyant Lands Mitigation Addendum Page 11
DMS ID No. 100595

Wetland Planting Zone
Plantanus occidentalis Sycamore FACW
Quercus phellos Willow Oak FAC
Betula nigra River Birch FACW
Quercus michauxii Swamp Chestnut Oak FACW
Sambucus canadensis Elderberry FACW
Alnus serrulata Tag Alder OBL
Cephalanthus occidentalis Common Buttonbush OBL
Rosa palustris Swamp rose OBL
Streambank Planting Zone
Cephalanthus occidentalis Common Buttonbush OBL
Salixsericea Silky Willow OBL
Physocarpus opulifolius Ninebark FACW
Sambucus canadensis Elderberry FAC
Juncus effusus Common Rush FACW
Carex crinita Fringed Sedge OBL
Carex lurida Lurid Sedge OBL
Carex alata Broadwing sedge OBL
Scirpus cyperinus Woolgrass FACW
6.0 Addendum Performance Standards
The stream and wetland performance standards for the project will follow approved performance
standards presented in the DMS Mitigation Plan Template (Version 2.3,June 2017),the Annual
Monitoring Template (June 2017), and the Wilmington District Stream and Wetland Compensatory
Mitigation Update issued October 2016 by the USACE and NCIRT. Annual monitoring and routine site
visits will be conducted by a qualified scientist to assess the condition of the finished project. Specific
performance standards that apply to this project are those described in the 2016 Compensatory
Mitigation Update including Vegetation (Section V, B, Items 1 through 3), Stream Channel Stability, and
Stream Hydrology Performance Standards (Section VI, B, Items 1 through 7). Performance standards are
summarized in 10.
Table 10:Summary of Performance Standards
Parameter Monitoring Feature Performance Standard
STREAM SPECIFIC PERFOMANCE STANDARDS1'2'3
Dimension Cross-Section Survey BHR<1.2; ER>2.2 for Bc channel
Pattern and Profile Visual Assessment Should indicate stream stability
Substrate Pebble Counts Coarser material in riffles;finer particles in pools
Photo • Cross-Section Photos No excessive erosion or degradation of banks
Documentation • Photo Points No mid-channel bars,Stable grade control
Hydrology Pressure Transducer
• Streams- Four bankfull events during the 7-year period; in
separate years
Wyant Lands Mitigation Addendum Page 12
DMS ID No. 100595

Parameter Monitoring Feature Performance Standard
• Wetlands—Free groundwater surface within 12 inches of the
ground surface for a minimum of 12% (27 consecutive days)of
the growing season.
SITE PERFOMANCE STANDARDS
MY3 success criteria:320 planted stems per acre,
MY5 success criteria: 260 planted stems per acre, average of 7
Vegetation Vegetation Plots feet in height in each plot
MY7 success criteria:210 planted stems per acre,average of 10
feet in height in each plot
Visual Assessment CCPV Signs of encroachment, instability, invasive species
1:BHR=bank height ratio,ER=entrenchment ratio
2: Riffles may fine over the course of monitoring due to the stabilization of contributing watershed sediment sources.
3:The monitoring period will follow the original mitigation plan monitoring schedule.If required by the NCIRT,Wildlands will
monitor the addendum portion of the project for an additional year.
7.0 Addendum Monitoring Plan
The Site monitoring plan has been developed to ensure that the required performance standards are
met, and project goals and objectives are achieved. Annual monitoring data will be reported using the
DMS Annual Monitoring Reporting Template (April 2015).The monitoring report shall provide project
data chronology that will facilitate an understanding of project status and trends, ease population of
DMS databases for analysis and research purposes and assist in close-out decision making.
Using the DMS As-Built Baseline Monitoring Report Template (June 2017), a baseline monitoring
document and as-built record drawings of the project will be developed within 60 days of the planting
completion and monitoring installation on the restored Site. Monitoring reports will be prepared in the
fall of each monitoring year and submitted to DMS by November 30.These reports will be based on the
DMS Annual Monitoring Template (April 2015) and Closeout Report Template (June 2017). Full
monitoring reports will be submitted to DMS in monitoring years 1, 2, 3, 5, and 7. Abbreviated
monitoring reports will be submitted in monitoring years 4 and 6. Closeout monitoring period will be
seven years beyond completion of construction or until performance standards have been met.
7.1 Addendum Monitoring Components
Project monitoring components are listed in more detail in Table 11. Approximate locations of the
proposed vegetation plots, cross-sections, and stream and groundwater gauge monitoring components
are illustrated in Figure 11A.
Wyant Lands Mitigation Addendum Page 13
DMS ID No. 100595

Table 11: Monitoring Components
Parameter Monitoring Feature Quantity/Length by Reach Frequency Notes
UT2 Reach 1
Riffle
Cross-Sections 1
Dimension Pool Year 1,2,3,5,and 7 1
Cross-Sections 1
Pattern Pattern N/A N/A
2
Profile Longitudinal Profile N/A N/A
Substrate Reach wide(RW) pebble 1 RW Year 1, 2, 3, 5, and 3
count 7
Crest Gauge(CG)/ 1 FG Semi Annual 4
Hydrology Flow Gauge(FG)
Vegetation CVS Level 2 Vegetation 5 Wetland Area Year 1,2,3,5,and 7 5
Plots
Wetlands Groundwater Gauges 4 Quarterly
Visual Y Y Semi Annual
Assessment
Exotic and
nuisance Semi-Annual 6
vegetation
Project
Boundary Semi-Annual 7
Reference Photographs 1 Annual 8
Photos
1.Cross-sections will be permanently marked with rebar to establish location.Surveys will include points measured at all breaks in
slope,including top of bank,bankfull,edge of water,and thalweg.
2.Pattern and profile will be assessed visually during semi-annual site visits.Longitudinal profile will be collected during as-built
baseline monitoring survey only unless observations indicate lack of stability and profile survey is warranted in additional years.
3.Riffle 100-count substrate sampling will be collected for surveyed cross-sections during the baseline monitoring only.Substrate
assessments in subsequent monitoring years will consist of reachwide substrate monitoring.
4.Crest gauges and/or transducers will be inspected quarterly or semi-annually,evidence of bankfull events will be documented
with a photo when possible.Transducers will be set to record stage once every 3 hours.The transducer will be inspected and
downloaded semi-annually.
5.One open planting area vegetation plot was installed in the riparian floodplain of UT2 Reach 1.The plot was installed per the
original mitigation plan monitoring requirements.
6.Locations of exotic and nuisance vegetation will be mapped.
7.Locations of vegetation damage,boundary encroachments,etc.will be mapped.
8.One photo point was installed on UT2 Reach1.The photo point was installed per the original mitigation plan.UT2 Reach 1 will
have a total of 2 photo points.
n Long-Term Management Plan
The Site will be transferred to the North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality (NCDEQ)
Stewardship Program.This party shall serve as conservation easement holder and long-term steward for
the property and will conduct periodic inspection of the Site to ensure that restrictions required in the
conservation easement are upheld. Reference Section 11.0 within the approved mitigation plan for
further information on long-term management.
Wyant Lands Mitigation Addendum Page 14
DMS ID No. 100595

Adaptive Management Plan
Adaptive management within the addendum area will follow techniques and protocol outlined in the
approved mitigation plan.
10.0 Determination of Credits
Proposed addendum stream and wetland credits are listed below in Table 12 and Table 13. Stream
restoration along UT2 Reach 1 is credited at a ratio of 1:1. Proposed addendum credits for the reach
include additional credits generated as part of the approach change along UT2 Reach 1 less the stream
credits generated as part of the original project and approach. Wetland re-establishment, rehabilitation,
and creation are credited at a ratio of 1:1, 1.5:1, and 3:1, respectively.
Table 12:Addendum Asset Table
Mitigation As-Built Mitigation Restoration Mitigation
Project Segment Plan Ft/Ac Category Level Ratio(X:1) Credits
Ft/Ac
Stream
UT2 Reach 1 396.000 N/A1 Warm R 1.000 231.6002
Total: 231.6002
Wetland
Wetland Group 3 3.360 N/A1 R REE 1.000 3.360
Wetland Group 4 1.078 N/A1 R RH 1.500 0.719
Wetland Group 5 1.303 N/A1 R C 3.000 0.434
Total: 4.513
1) As-built survey on addendum area not yet performed.
2) 231.600 additional mitigation credits represent the additional 396.000 stream credits that will be generated by restoration along
UT2 Reach 1 less the 164.400 stream credits in the approved mitigation plan.
Wyant Lands Mitigation Addendum Page 15
DMS ID No. 100595

Table 13: Revised Asset Table for the Amended Wyant Lands Mitigation Site(Original plus Addendum)
Mitigation As-Built Mitigation Restoration Mitigation
Project Segment Plan Ft/Ac Category Level Ratio(X:1) Credits
Ft/Ac
Stream
UT1 604.000 604.000 Warm R 1.000 604.000
UT2 Reach 1 396.000 N/A1 Warm R 1.000 396.000
UT2 Reach 2 515.000 515.000 Warm Ell 2.500 206.000
UT2 Reach 3 1,042.000 1,042.000 Warm R 1.000 1,042.000
UT3 Reach 1 374.000 376.000 Warm El 1.500 250.667
UT3 Reach 2 326.000 328.000 Warm R 1.000 328.000
Wyant Creek Reach 1 1,482.000 1,475.000 Warm R 1.000 1,475.000
Wyant Creek Reach 2 523.000 523.000 Warm R 1.000 523.000
Wyant Creek Reach 3 295.000 295.000 Warm R 1.000 295.000
Wyant Creek Reach 4 1,972.000 1,971.000 Warm R 1.000 1,971.000
Total: 7,090.667
Wetland-14.352
Wetland Group 1 11.000 10.992 R REE 1.000 10.992
Wetland Group 2 3.200 3.155 R RH 1.500 2.103
Wetland Group 3 3.360 N/A1 R REE 1.000 3.360
Wetland Group 4 1.078 N/A1 R RH 1.500 0.719
Wetland Group 5 1.303 N/A1 R C 3.000 0.434
Total: 17.608
1) As-built survey on addendum area not yet performed.
Project Credits
Stream Riparian Non-Rip Coastal
Restoration Level Warm Cool Cold Wetland Wetland Marsh
Restoration 6,634.000 0.000 0.000
Re-Establishment 14.352 0.000 0.000
Rehabilitation 2.822 0.000 0.000
Enhancement 0.000 0.000 0.000
Enhancement I 250.667 0.000 0.000
Enhancement II 206.000 0.000 0.000
Creation 0.434 0.000 0.000
Preservation 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Totals 7,090.667 17.608
Total Stream Credit 7,090.667
Total Wetland Credit 17.608
Wyant Lands Mitigation Addendum Page 16
DMS ID No. 100595

11.0 References
Wildlands Engineering, Inc. 2020. Wyant Lands Finial Mitigation Plan, NCDMS, Raleigh, NC.
Wyant Lands Mitigation Addendum Page 17
DMS ID No. 100595

FIGURES

Project Parcels x, ' YrF .;r
k ' ' Recorded Conservation Easement '' �., WYANT JERRY T ..
t _ _ I 3615172986
Proposed Conservation Easement
L.+ + i ''
Previously Constructed Project Areas ; x '
1 Existing Open Waters ,. ■ ��'
y ■► VVYiANT CREEK R7 . ..... rojir
,' ..
Existing Wetlands r- .� ►► _�,,,� Addendum Area
Project Streams Y-• ■ ► - -- __=��ir'«.... j-
di
Non-Project Streams 1 ' i _ WYAN---T-LAN-
NT LANDS, L z
"' 3615074254+ -�.. -�--Y�rdrr.rat.
fQReachBaks !
,,.. ,,,,, ,A..4,:...„, ,,,,,
t �!
S
■ o
.:
,. )N11..
�: % .. x1LUCA
3615368514
TTROBERTTHOMA �. , : riv../,..1 1 :, :::.. ,,..:i',..6,..,, , .- , : - '.--••7a-.". ,
% 0 % r ,0 1 :i_.._ ,• •
5joiim,r)
► V1IYiANT CREEK R2 m
360587305 �
f/'.
k..- .,t► —sle\
-ate ti;'. ': - "„�__ `.
� :�1.4 4 1%0 I k N.--%"'`fti i....0 0 1...""%■ t. ► 6REEK[;� � JGREEKG -==
1''1 4x,1,1,1 1,1 1io,
l-
'r —. `'t
tANT !HOMI ))
j.:;4,1.r..,:.6-::':::o,...r.*r.,..,:'r••"A,,.r..._.,*,:,l.:'i:LP‘:-.-
i,-I,iI,.i I,i I 1pF-I,iN-T-\-
,NH O i11Oi0i zMr PAaA'S
:I,
:,•i'/4,
• It
_-,,.._.-..__.._...„.,6...,..„_._;_,...,-_-4,
':N,'F
4/1:,,
. ' + 7 f €;
arm.
WYANT LANDS LLC • , .. f .V,, ,I,V- '.
3605959148 .' ,•' r� a [ e- 't1'..-•• i •.
/ -• ...,1 N ki .. : ,, ,..41, , ,),,,,._ _ ,,1% r. ,..._._-,,,
l f z. j .�•r.��.�S h.r I r:
Addendum Area � v
WYANTLANDLLC � l•r• - 'Y• • a, �:�s
1. / $� , • ,.a 3605959148 Y .ff, :.r. .1m,ti r it, :e..,t 4. t.
WT2 R s }
- •
_ i_ RUTHERFI-.,q_ �� 1 - ti`' ►1 44 8'% . .•. _ •
'tw.€...'. "�
• ELEC MEMB r sy� `_ _._:,_ .r y s
F. CORP, i^� �, ' r 1 ,. is
. i. , k
i r.'.
y -di 360585713Y � w. �.s
ifiellri,:'-.1;r: - , ,--, "-..' ..,. .
,.. . - . v4-E-L--- _ix . t.4,A•.,i-, , \---_____. , ,,,, '4p' 4.- V C -,',.„'!e. '' '.. .gr.:. .7 .. ''
L i', iii
illakiika i"J�" ' � 2019 Aerial Imagery
.1W111.11. 111k. -
Figure 2A Addendum Site Map
W I L D L A N D S 0 150 300 Feet Wyant Lands Mitigation Site
ENGINEERING Catawba River Basin 03050102
I I I
(03050103 Expanded Service Area)
N Lincoln County, NC

(Mr,' • _e. 7. °'' n
- Project Parcels "+ ; yit f. r
' Recorded Conservation Easement •* ;441-. .
Pro osed Conservation Easement 4'.,
Previously Constructed Project Areas �'• '°'� - ~ '
♦ ►I z ,1'
Stream Restoration ♦PeC2 "`'
Stream Enhancement I ♦♦ ♦♦ Wil(iANT CREEK R.1 J
Stream Enhancement II ♦♦ ♦♦ , — - .•. Addendum Area '. r 1
♦ ♦
Stream Not For Credit ♦ t1t •
♦ ♦ fl
Proposed Stream Restoration ♦ ♦ .-p '
Non-Project Streams PaD +,
OReach Breaks ♦ '
ChA-Chewacla loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, frequently flooded ♦ '• 0
•
LcD- Lloyd loam, 15 to 25 percent slopes ♦`♦ •♦♦♦.PeC2 PaD • ~
C�
i ;
LdB2- Lloyd sandy clay loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes, moderately eroded ' - - - ♦♦ WANT CREEK R2 ' •m
L
LdC2- Lloyd sandy clay loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes, moderately eroded �' a - - -♦ ♦♦♦ ChA
CPaD- Pacolet sandy clay loam, 15 to 25 percent slopes ♦♦ ♦ -,
PeC2- Pacolet sandy clay loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes, moderately eroded ♦_ ♦ :
♦ ',, W�yANT CREEK G 3 L :
RvA- Riverview loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, occasionally flooded ♦ - - - _ _ • - '
WoA-Worsham fine sandy loam, o to 2 percent slopes • ♦ - •• • Rv
^ i�F .1t1 /cD
■ s;:;
. 404
N.
� U i I.V , .. ; jam,. ..
4 ?g `
iiiiik .
PeC2 .-, a - .c. ,* , 7 . '
v= • -,kt •mac. ,'' c, ,
Addendum Area 4. . . . `�F - " ' ..•• - •• 2019Aerial,h agery
1
nm oils Ma
killgyive
W I L D L A N D S 0 150 300 Feet Wyant5A Addendum Lands Mitigation Site
ENGINEERING
I I I Catawba River Basin 03050102
(03050103 Figure Expandeddu Service
S Area)
Lincoln County, NCp

- Open W .,
Wetland T0
- Project Parcels
Wetland
i• it ■ ■ ■
Y +�// /�� i��' , ■ ■ Recorded Conservation Easement
r. � Proposed Conservation Easement
GVVG 1 eVVG T`03
Previously Constructed Project Areas
�� � Previously Constructed Wetland Re-Establishment
�;,:;:.. ,� Wetland R
Le/A�f�ff / ii
�� _ :. Previously Constructed Wetland Rehabilitation
Wyant Creek Reach 9 ��� Existing Wetlands
Wetland Q i
Existing Open Waters
,, • MPBMP
■
` m G s •■ Project Streams
♦♦♦ ■ Non-Project Streams
.♦ • Groundwater Gage Locations
• �r J ■ Reach Breaks
• ■
•• GWG 4�`• , ii a or, ..• , ,• =- ' , %.. _ _,_ __ sII 4 r�y
• .
. ...1 , 7:„... , ., 'le.t •.0, 3#
■ ♦ E.:* ' GWG 19 -_. • 1.7 j-ram
♦ ♦ GWG 2
♦ ♦ •
n.. GWG 3 ■
_
♦ i Y ..
Vato Creek3218 ♦ GWG • '
G3
♦•
NT CREEK 2'
WYA y '
S•
. , , , , , , , ,
• - • .- ,., 5 NENE. 1.1,1' '1:' - - :,
♦• 1 • - ~, o ffup a=.7 2? ,►.r
• ., ,.: , v...... . - . _._, _
• .
, ,
4....,. .f.t,„..., 14,
._..3 , , x
• ,... , .. 0 .• • _ •_. ,_ . . ... __ • • • . ,-. , A ntriVr,,4::-::‘. , i,_ , -,. .i. .,..--',,,e,-',
,.....Nit;,- , ,/ , • • • ,z..Wr-s. -10_ • -....4 ro-a •• --t- , ..; • 'LL•
•
r , ., ,. .
..., . . _ . . .... .. ...
. .._ _ .. . __ _ _ _ _ . .
. ... , ......
: , .
�a■ Wetland I Y •4 0.!,:.i•- ,-
II
. 001001. ..., Ai . _ . _ __ E----•, .;, ,•44(rpr... ..,- -4.4`" V%:7_,.
limmiiii,
, • WI ....m..... : . - s 2019 Aerial Imagery:]
Figure 6.1A Addendum Existing Conditions Map- East Side
W I L D L A N D S 0 150 300 Feet ` Wyant Lands Mitigation Site 4,411,
ENGINEERING v Catawba River Basin 03050102
I I I
(03050103 Expanded Service Area)
N Lincoln County, NC

I - Project Parcels
. . .
'Recorded Conservation Easement l
Previously Constructed Project Areas
1 Existing Wetlands
— Project Streams /4
Non-Project Streams
Addendum Existing Condtions Cross Sections ,
O Reach Breaks '
3 4
•
/ • ..
f/ • I _
II
Wetland O -.I ` , y��
1.
- 1
,. •
♦
♦
1
} •♦ _ of_,
n1 �y..��.�., ~ k:
VLIG3 L�]ir U � r.•
Wetland L
_ _ fit:
r' i
/
Wetland N t¢ _
Wetland M
•
/
v
Figure 6.2A Addendum Existing Conditions Map-West Side
ilVigipr W I L D L A N D S Wyant Lands Mitigation Site
E N O I N E E R I N G 0 50 1 I Feet \ Catawba River Basin 03050102
I IV (03050103 Expanded Service Area)
N Lincoln County, NC

•1 1,
QProject Parcels
_ ...s,.. , . .,. , . _.. .. . 7
1- I Recorded Conservation Easementdok . ,
`
I - - ilk i +..' .�r i r�
Proposed Conservation Easement Y84- ,r
•' CI ra* -.Fe...0F(
t . v., 085)
.43" 7
:L}ro ♦♦ _` •is - s - • "f, -. _ ww
4' f
I V .'\‘'.-
.i., 7? e• .. ,:,...„4', ,_ �r
i,. , niiiiiiiiir--.i- otr..ii.
'4.1. -
,_
. .. , , ,.
I
- 1,
1
N414 !,_ ... ,. :_..:., _ .,y:, ..,.-,,,,r,!,:.-- .). _:_ ,....,..... . .
. , .... .. -- . , )1
,.. , ,_ .,
14051Liiiii-0.- - - . _ ,-., ,
. .. .it.T ,,, 3... . :;,,ji' •_ 1i : I I:,?li.0_Ili•-•",i,,-4,._-., ._.......0.._:;1 4
IP;
- -•c aft `�TT'' S1 ��{•J/'
ram ' 'r� �' '*01
:Y Y.•. s •t
tip. L�r ' . % ass
• •r
�'. fir' , •+'r,,,,. �.:* — . - :'''' : F •Nry ..
.-
, ,.-4_V.i-irr-"
. -, 7 ' .
. . - 'Ai: *
Lincoln County, NC FIRM Panel 370146, effective on 8-16-2007 - _
K 5t€� - a;. '
Figure 7A Addendum FEMA Floodplain Map
‘i
W I L D L A N D SWyant Lands Mitigation Site livilly
ENGINEERING 0 150 300Feet
I I I I Catawba River Basin 03050102
N Lincoln County, NC

".tip:.:• 'a '. tea:s.; n.7 - i V:,L
' r t' Project Parcels
t� '../ Recorded Conservation Easement
- + r,> '' `"° ' ".� = Proposed Conservation Easement
" - �" "'�-r ` x.::.•
- PreviouslyConstructed Project Areas
, ;�r; - •;-E•. ' �= ... „' ` .•� Previously Constructed Wetland Re-establishment
.. .�. -
`4'w °;= =;�k • PreviouslyConstructed Wetland Rehabilitation
,r X y • '• ,� ` ' s 4r' Proposed Wetland Creation
" •i)A. � i''iL- .:F. ♦ •all"::y. -. \\
�i.• �,.. *�� ., " <� • r � Proposed Wetland Re-establishment
.f ••.+ _ Proposed Wetland Rehabilitation
I. ������1\� i: :�s r •
'N �� = � �;�I';' r•' vii Internal Crossings
a ho.
\ Project Streams
;:. ;N -. :. ? Nii ���\ Non Project Streams
} .# `\\\\ \. \\\ \�\\� te
Reach Breaks
■
f 1. ■ ■ ..
' ■ ■
r.
■ • ■ F L ',, •
.
[: '.•r ■
lr w. ■ ■
' ' ■
} i.
•
•
. it
. . •
. . . . . ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ /�■ •■At
W,yant Creek Reach 4 ■ sa x AtiW ;x r' `.
iZ 7•
•
■ is is ■.
•
♦ WYANT CREEK
Figure 10.1A Addendum Concept Design Map- East Side
ik
W I L D L A N D S 0 150 300 Feet Wyant Lands Mitigation Site tiv4kr
ENGINEERING Catawba River Basin 03050102
I I I
(03050103 Expanded Service Area)
N Lincoln County, NC

r 'F t -
F /� , - Project Parcels
r
` Recorded Conservation Easement
VAr/ g /
Existin Wetlands
Proposed BMP
a ./ r/i
- Internal Crossings
e, ' Proposed Stream Restoration ..
T
i _ - Non-Project Streams
` 1411- - _ 0 Reach Breaks
IF ,,- .rA
tilk 11% , r 4, - -' 7',' . .fffitk:
•.- „..9, . . 4,"
,.. . ..
._, - ,,,.., L, ./., .- • ,... 4 • :, w ' •
. . - ; ."-:, .lip-. '' ... ••'.• .. 411 ;411111P
Wetland • • `• f - • . . .0 fr• r__
`° ° y* ■ X-■ � , ,. — ; . sal ' %�
- % : _ •
• 1.,.
Y
• 4410- ... /Wetland LN i 4 t- 3. 'r ..y f '., s
• tr • n rt
jill
-,. -. • ,. (1 ‘,/ir • ht.., A
a- ►�
- ► Wetland N
t R •► i tqf•
4`�"�t 111111k i.
-Ni
, ,-�w
•
---fi' \ .
019 4 o. •.I Imagery
Figure 10.2A Addendum Concept Design Map-West Side
ty0,' W I L D L A N D S 0 150 300 Feet Wyant Lands Mitigation Site
ENGINEERING I I Catawba River Basin 03050102
(03050103 Expanded Service Area)
N Lincoln County, NC

d Lalr. 45 SW..:.W:415+1 4' illialiS .k !' • 4'.I �I :.i '
• ' ..�. 4 I .,. plf.
...... ..-T" - ,,..,;.:4,/, ,
r
1 - Project Parcels r,' ,�.� �' g K
' Recorded Conservation Easement ~` `' n
Proposed Conservation Easement 4a 4
Internal Crossings . .•`
/
ig
�-
`-' + WANT CREEK R1 `+�,"' -""rr°"
Planting Open : - 1
r Planting-Shaded ` ;
Planting Wetland F g .
Previously Constructed Project Areas ;¢ `f�
Original Mit Plan Permanent Vegetation Plots • a ❑
Stream Restoration ��; ‘ii ''
Stream Enhancement I 2� , 40060, ,
-
Stream Enhancement II ■b p
li Stream Not For Credit '
WJ(iANT CREEK R2 ti':
Non-Project Streams "'Q n1
Original Mit Plan Cross Sections /J � ;:".:i •
,,
Q Reach Breaks Q
krill...1\1.. ,
XS1
Original Mit Plan Groundwater Gauges • w — ;.. �- •7 '
Wil(iANT CREEK R3
Original Mit Plan Stream Gauges ' �_
.,\
l'i) I ❑ �WYANTCiq:
+ Original Mit Plan Photo Points
\—• .-'.., : +to + . .
, o (1)/11 ) •I'Nf I\...1.4kL. CI 4'
Addendum - /1144:_ _Nac: it
Addendum BMP CREEKG}'3 O
Addendum Stream Restoration ;` `^` ' ~'R� \--:-"!...-•
mils'
Addendum Cross Section �� y
❑ Addendum Permanent Vegetation Plotse. :: ,••
/ �� `•
0 Addendum Photo Point �,� � 1 UT3 R1 `' r. „
Addendum Ground Water Gauges ' 49
00, +� 11
•
I : '"
Addendum Stream gage N&�L�3 • +' ,,,.' { '� r -:va y::.`r{
•
fir_,.: .,C: _,. :i :•e4 'Sr "µ.
. )41 . \+qr.,', ...•••• " I'
—' ;i..: '=% ` 2019Aerial Imagery
Figure 11A Addendum Monitoring Plan
02v0,W I L D L A N D S 0 150 300 Feet \ Wyant Lands Mitigation Site
ENGINEERING
v Catawba River Basin 03050102
I I I
(03050103 Expanded Service Area)
N Lincoln County, NC

- Project Parcels .,
- - Recorded Conservation Easement
L- Proposed Conservation Easement g
Elevation(Feet)
- High :900
NMI
- Low :770
4
Amendment Area
a ANT LANDS, LLC
615074254
- ,
a
C, I
I I
RICHA-' LUC,
. 36153:%514
WYANT ROBERT TH AS
3605873054 •- It
UT1 . y
. 1 1
11F,
1
. .14411
. .... .:
.. ..
- - - - - - -
1 1
,.
1 _ •
_ ..
y
YANT ROBER HOMAS
W - - _ _ _ 10
360596484 ANT - - - -
JERRY -►
THOMAS ►
3605959968 ■ '
illiffir
WYAN ' +S LLC
48 0'(`L
h.
11
_ i ( . 11111P
Amendment Area , A LAND LLC
360 59148
RUTHERFORD
ELEC MEMB
• CORP
iti 36058571 ��
r
Figure 13 Wyant Lands LIDAR
W I L D L A N D S 0 200 400 Feet Wyant Lands Mitigation Site
ENGINEERING Catawba River Basin 03050102
I I I
(03050103 Expanded Service Area)
N Lincoln County, NC

APPENDIX 3A
Amendment Jurisdictional Determination and NCWAM Forms

U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
WILMINGTON DISTRICT
Action ID: SAW-2017-02609 County: Lincoln U.S.G.S. Quad: Reepsville
NOTIFICATION OF JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
Property Owner/Applicant: Wildlands Engineering,Inc./Attn.: Ian Eckardt
Address: 1430 S.Mint Street,Suite 104
Charlotte,NC 28203
Telephone Number: 704-332-7754
Email: [e-mail]
Size(acres): 10.2 Nearest Town: Vale
Nearest Waterway: Pott Creek and UTs Pott Creek Coordinates: 35.53072,-81.31928
River Basin/HUC: South Fork Catawba(03050102)
Location description: The project site is located on a tract of land(PIN 3615-07-4254)at 2847 Wyant Road in Vale,
Lincoln County,North Carolina.
Indicate Which of the Following Apply:
A. Preliminary Determination
X There are waters,including wetlands,on the above described project area, that may be subject to Section 404 of the
Clean Water Act(CWA)(33 USC § 1344)and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act(RHA)(33 USC § 403). The
waters,including wetlands, have been delineated, and the delineation has been verified by the Corps to be sufficiently
accurate and reliable. Therefore this preliminary jurisdiction deteunination may be used in the peunit evaluation
process,including deteunining compensatory mitigation. For purposes of computation of impacts,compensatory
mitigation requirements, and other resource protection measures, a peunit decision made on the basis of a preliminary JD
will treat all waters and wetlands that would be affected in any way by the peu,uitted activity on the site as if they are
jurisdictional waters of the U.S. This preliminary deteunination is not an appealable action under the Regulatory
Program Administrative Appeal Process(Reference 33 CFR Part 331). However,you may request an approved JD,
which is an appealable action,by contacting the Corps district for further instruction.
_ There are wetlands on the above described property, that may be subject to Section 404 of the Clean Water Act
(CWA)(33 USC § 1344) and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act(RHA)(33 USC § 403).However, since the
waters,including wetlands, have not been properly delineated,this preliminary jurisdiction deteunination may not be
used in the peunit evaluation process. Without a verified wetland delineation,this preliminary deteunination is merely
an effective presumption of CWA/RHA jurisdiction over all of the waters,including wetlands, at the project area,
which is not sufficiently accurate and reliable to support an enforceable peunit decision. We recommend that you have
the waters of the U.S. on your property delineated. As the Corps may not be able to accomplish this wetland
delineation in a timely manner,you may wish to obtain a consultant to conduct a delineation that can be verified by the
Corps.
B. Approved Determination
_ There are Navigable Waters of the United States within the above described property subject to the peunit requirements
of Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act(RHA) (33 USC § 403) and Section 404 of the Clean Water Act(CWA)(33
USC § 1344). Unless there is a change in law or our published regulations,this deteunination may be relied upon for a
period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
_ There are waters of the U.S.,including wetlands, on the above described project area subject to the permit
requirements of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act(CWA) (33 USC § 1344). Unless there is a change in the law or our
published regulations,this deteunination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this
notification.
_ We recommend you have the waters of the U.S. on your property delineated. As the Corps may not be able to
accomplish this wetland delineation in a timely manner,you may wish to obtain a consultant to conduct a delineation
that can be verified by the Corps.
_ The waters of the U.S.,including wetlands, on your project area have been delineated and the delineation has been
verified by the Corps. We strongly suggest you have this delineation surveyed. Upon completion,this survey should be
reviewed and verified by the Corps. Once verified,this survey will provide an accurate depiction of all areas subject to

CWA jurisdiction on your property which,provided there is no change in the law or our published regulations,may be
relied upon for a period not to exceed five years.
_ The waters of the U.S.,including wetlands, have been delineated and surveyed and are accurately depicted on the
plat signed by the Corps Regulatory Official identified below on . Unless there is a change in the law or
our published regulations,this deteunination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of
this notification.
_ There are no waters of the U.S.,to include wetlands,present on the above described project area which are subject to the
peunit requirements of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act(33 USC 1344). Unless there is a change in the law or our
published regulations,this deteunination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this
notification.
_ The property is located in one of the 20 Coastal Counties subject to regulation under the Coastal Area Management Act
(CAMA). You should contact the Division of Coastal Management in Morehead City,NC, at(252)808-2808 to
deteunine their requirements.
Placement of dredged or fill material within waters of the US,including wetlands,without a Department of the Auny permit
may constitute a violation of Section 301 of the Clean Water Act(33 USC § 1311). Placement of dredged or fill material,
construction or placement of structures,or work within navigable waters of the United States without a Department of the
Auny permit may constitute a violation of Sections 9 and/or 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act(33 USC § 401 and/or 403). If
you have any questions regarding this deteunination and/or the Corps regulatory program,please contact David Brown at
828-271-7980, ext.4232 or [e-mail].
C. Basis for Determination:
See attached preliminary jurisdictional deteunination four.
D. Remarks:
The potential waters of the U.S. at this site were verified by the Corps during a site inspection on September 9,2021, and
are as approximately depicted on the attached Delineation Map,Figures 3.0 and 3.4 submitted by Wildlands
Engineering,Inc. This project area covers an additional 10.2 acres that is being added to the existing NCDMS Wyant
Lands Mitigation Site project area.
E. Attention USDA Program Participants
The delineation included herein has been conducted to identify the location and extent of the aquatic resource boundaries
and/or the jurisdictional status of aquatic resources for purposes of the Clean Water Act for the particular site identified in
this request. This delineation and/or jurisdictional deteunination may not be valid for the Wetland Conservation Provisions of
the Food Security Act of 1985, as amended. If you or your tenant are USDA program participants,or anticipate participation
in USDA programs,you should discuss the applicability of a certified wetland deteunination with the local USDA service
center,prior to starting work.
F. Appeals Information for Approved Jurisdiction Determinations (as indicated in Section B. above)
If you object to this deteunination,you may request an administrative appeal under Corps regulations at 33 CFR Part 331.
Enclosed you will find a Notification of Appeal Process(NAP)fact sheet and Request for Appeal(RFA)four. If you
request to appeal this deteunination you must submit a completed RFA four to the following address:
US Auny Corps of Engineers
South Atlantic Division
Attn: Mr.Philip A. Shannin
Administrative Appeal Review Officer
60 Forsyth Street SW,Floor M9
Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8803
OR
[e-mail]
2

In order for an RFA to be accepted by the Corps,the Corps must deteunine that it is complete,that it meets the criteria for
appeal under 33 CFR part 331.5,and that it has been received by the Division Office within 60 days of the date of the NAP.
Should you decide to submit an RFA foul',it must be received at the above address by,N/A(preliminary jurisdictional
determination).
It is not necessary to submit an RFA form to the Division Office if you do not object to the determination in this
correspondence.
Corps Regulatory Official:
•ar "
David Brown
Issue Date of JD: September 15,2021 Expiration Date: N/A preliminary jurisdictional determination
The Wilmington District is committed to providing the highest level of support to the public. To help us ensure we continue
to do so,please complete our Customer Satisfaction Survey,located online at https://regulatory.ops.usace.ailny.mil/customer-
service-survey/
Copy Furnished(by email):
None
3

lint
NOTIFICATION OF ADMINISTRATIVE APPEAL OPTIONS AND PROCESS AND
REQUEST FOR APPEAL
Applicant: Wildlands Engineering,Inc./Attn.: Ian File Number: SAW-2017-02609 Date: September 15,2021
Eckardt
Attached is: See Section below
❑ INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT (Standard Peunit or Letter of peunission) A
❑ PROFFERED PERMIT(Standard Peunit or Letter of peunission) B
❑ PERMIT DENIAL C
❑ APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION D
N PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION E
SECTION I- The following identifies your rights and options regarding an administrative appeal of the above decision. Additional
infoiuiation may be found at http://www.usace.ailny.mil/Missions/CivilWorks/RegulatoryProgramandPeunits.aspx or Corps regulations
at 33 CFR Part 331.
A: INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT: You may accept or object to the peilnit.
• ACCEPT: If you received a Standard Peunit,you may sign the peilnit document and return it to the district engineer for final
authorization. If you received a Letter of Permission(LOP),you may accept the LOP and your work is authorized. Your signature
on the Standard Peilnit or acceptance of the LOP means that you accept the peilnit in its entirety, and waive all rights to appeal the
peilnit,including its terns and conditions, and approved jurisdictional determinations associated with the peilnit.
• OBJECT: If you object to the peilnit(Standard or LOP)because of certain terms and conditions therein,you may request that the
peilnit be modified accordingly. You must complete Section II of this foul' and return the foul'to the district engineer. Your
objections must be received by the district engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice,or you will forfeit your right to appeal
the peilnit in the future. Upon receipt of your letter,the district engineer will evaluate your objections and may: (a)modify the
peilnit to address all of your concerns, (b)modify the peilnit to address some of your objections,or(c)not modify the peilnit
having deteilnined that the peilnit should be issued as previously written. After evaluating your objections,the district engineer
will send you a proffered permit for your reconsideration, as indicated in Section B below.
B: PROFFERED PERMIT: You may accept or appeal the peilnit
• ACCEPT: If you received a Standard Peunit,you may sign the peilnit document and return it to the district engineer for final
authorization. If you received a Letter of Permission(LOP),you may accept the LOP and your work is authorized. Your signature
on the Standard Peilnit or acceptance of the LOP means that you accept the peilnit in its entirety, and waive all rights to appeal the
peilnit,including its terns and conditions, and approved jurisdictional determinations associated with the peilnit.
• APPEAL: If you choose to decline the proffered permit(Standard or LOP)because of certain terns and conditions therein,you
may appeal the declined peilnit under the Corps of Engineers Administrative Appeal Process by completing Section II of this form
and sending the foul'to the division engineer. This foul'must be received by the division engineer within 60 days of the date of
this notice.
C: PERMIT DENIAL: You may appeal the denial of a peilnit under the Corps of Engineers Administrative Appeal Process by
completing Section II of this foul'and sending the foul'to the division engineer. This form must be received by the division engineer
within 60 days of the date of this notice.
D: APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION: You may accept or appeal the approved JD or provide new information.
• ACCEPT: You do not need to notify the Corps to accept an approved JD. Failure to notify the Corps within 60 days of the date of
this notice means that you accept the approved JD in its entirety, and waive all rights to appeal the approved JD.
• APPEAL: If you disagree with the approved JD,you may appeal the approved JD under the Corps of Engineers Administrative
Appeal Process by completing Section II of this foul'and sending the foul'to the division engineer. This form must be received by
the division engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice.
E: PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION: You do not need to respond to the Corps regarding the preliminary JD.
The Preliminary JD is not appealable. If you wish,you may request an approved JD (which may be appealed),by contacting the Corps
district for further instruction. Also you may provide new infoilnation for further consideration by the Corps to reevaluate the JD.
4

SECTION II-REQUEST FOR APPEAL or OBJECTIONS TO AN INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT
REASONS FOR APPEAL OR OBJECTIONS: (Describe your reasons for appealing the decision or your objections to an initial
proffered peu,uit in clear concise statements. You may attach additional infounation to this four to clarify where your reasons or
objections are addressed in the administrative record.)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: The appeal is limited to a review of the administrative record,the Corps memorandum for the record
of the appeal conference or meeting, and any supplemental infounation that the review officer has deteu,uined is needed to clarify the
administrative record. Neither the appellant nor the Corps may add new infounation or analyses to the record. However,you may
provide additional infounation to clarify the location of information that is already in the administrative record.
POINT OF CONTACT FOR QUESTIONS OR INFORMATION: 1=1-
If you have questions regarding this decision and/or the If you only have questions regarding the appeal process you may also
appeal process you may contact: contact:
District Engineer,Wilmington Regulatory Division, Mr.Philip Shannin,Administrative Appeal Review Officer
Attn: David Brown CESAD-PDO
69 Darlington Avenue U.S.Army Corps of Engineers,South Atlantic Division
Wilmington,North Carolina 28403 60 Forsyth Street,Room 10M15
Atlanta,Georgia 30303-8801
828-271-7980,ext.4232
[e-mail]. Phone: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
RIGHT OF ENTRY: Your signature below grants the right of entry to Corps of Engineers personnel, and any government consultants,
to conduct investigations of the project site during the course of the appeal process. You will be provided a 15 day notice of any site
investigation, and will have the opportunity to participate in all site investigations.
Date: Telephone number:
Signature of appellant or agent.
For appeals on Initial Proffered Permits send this form to:
District Engineer,Wilmington Regulatory Division,Attn: David Brown,69 Darlington Avenue,Wilmington,North
Carolina 28403
For Permit denials,Proffered Permits and approved Jurisdictional Determinations send this form to:
Division Engineer,Commander,U.S.Army Engineer Division,South Atlantic,Attn: Mr.Phillip Shannin,
Administrative Appeal Officer,CESAD-PDO,60 Forsyth Street,Room 10M15,Atlanta,Georgia 30303-8801
Phone: [phone]
5

PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (JD)FORM
U.S.Army Corps of Engineers
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR PRELIMINARY JD: September 15,2021
B. NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERSON REQUESTING PRELIMINARY JD:
Wildlands Engineering,Inc./Attn.: Ian Eckardt
1430 S. Mint Street, Suite 104
Charlotte,NC 28203
C. DISTRICT OFFICE,FILE NAME,AND NUMBER:
CESAW-RG-A, SAW-2017-02609,NCDMS Wyant Lands Mitigation Site Addition
i
D. PROJECT LOCATION(S)AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
The project site is located on a tract of land(PIN 3615-07-4254) at 2847 Wyant Road in Vale,Lincoln County,
North Carolina.
State: NC County/parish/borough: Lincoln City: Vale
Center coordinates of site(lat/long in degree decimal fouinat): 35.53072,-81.31928
Universal Transverse Mercator: N/A
Name of nearestwaterbody: Pott Creek and UTs Pott Creek
E. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
IOffice(Desk)Deteimination. Date: September 15,2021
Field Determination. Date(s): September 9,2021
Use the table below to document aquatic resources and/or aquatic resources at different sites
TABLE OF AQUATIC RESOURCES INREVIEW AREA WHICH"MAY BE"SUBJECT TO REGULATORY
JURISDICTION
Centered Coordinates Estimated Amount of Geographic
Site Number (decimal degrees) Aquatic Resource in Type of Aquatic Authority to Which
Review Area Resources Aquatic Resource
Latitude Longitude (linear feet or acre) "May Be" Subject
Wetland Q 35.533512 -81.315231 0.315 ac Wetland Section 404
Wetland R 35.533793 -81.315231 0.358 ac Wetlalad Section 404
Wetland S 35.534131 -81.314803 0.208 ac Wetland Section 404
Wetland T 35.534279 -81.314393 0.160 ac Wetland Section 404
Open Water 2 35.534184 -81.314218 0.307 ac Non-wetland Waters Section 404
1. The Corps of Engineers believes that there may be jurisdictional aquatic resources in the review
area, and the requestor of this PJD is hereby advised of his or her option to request and obtain an
approved JD (AJD)for that review area based on an informed decision after having discussed the
various types of JDs and their characteristics and circumstances when they may be appropriate.
6

2. In any circumstance where a permit applicant obtains an individual permit, or a Nationwide General
Permit (NWP) or other general peunit verification requiring "pre-construction notification" (PCN),
or requests verification for a non-reporting NWP or other general permit, and the permit applicant
has not requested an AJD for the activity, the permit applicant is hereby made aware that: (1)the
permit applicant has elected to seek a permit authorization based on a PJD,which does not make
an official determination of jurisdictional aquatic resources; (2)the applicant has the option to
request an AJD before accepting the terms and conditions of the permit authorization, and that
basing a permit authorization on an AJD could possibly result in less compensatory mitigation
being required or different special conditions; (3)the applicant has the right to request an individual
permit rather than accepting the terms and conditions of the NWP or other general permit
authorization; (4) the applicant can accept a permit authorization and thereby agree to comply with
all the terms and conditions of that permit, including whatever mitigation requirements the Corps
has determined to be necessary; (5) undertaking any activity in reliance upon the subject permit
authorization without requesting an AJD constitutes the applicant's acceptance of the use of the
PJD; (6) accepting a peunit authorization (e.g., signing a proffered individual permit) or
undertaking any activity in reliance on any form of Corps permit authorization based on a PJD
constitutes agreement that all aquatic resources in the review area affected in any way by that
activity will be treated as jurisdictional, and waives any challenge to such jurisdiction in any
administrative or judicial compliance or enforcement action, or in any administrative appeal or in
any Federal court; and (7)whether the applicant elects to use either an AJD or a PJD,the JD will
be processed as soon as practicable. Further, an AJD, a proffered individual permit (and all terms
and conditions contained therein), or individual permit denial can be administratively appealed
pursuant to 33 C.F.R. Part 331. If,during an administrative appeal, it becomes appropriate to
make an official determination whether geographic jurisdiction exists over aquatic resources in the
review area, or to provide an official delineation of jurisdictional aquatic resources in the review
area, the Corps will provide an AJD to accomplish that result, as soon as is practicable. This PJD
finds that there "may be"waters of the U.S. and/or that there "may be"navigable waters of the U.S.
on the subject review area, and identifies all aquatic features in the review area that could be
affected by the proposed activity, based on the following information:
SUPPORTING DATA
Data reviewed for preliminary JD (check all that apply) - Checked items should be included in subject file.
Appropriately reference sources below where indicated for all checked items:
IMaps,plans,plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of preliminary JD requester: Wildlands Engineering,Inc.
Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of preliminary JD requester. Wildlands Engineering,Inc.
® Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report.
❑ Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report.Rational:
❑ Data sheets prepared by the Corps:
❑ Corps navigable waters' study:
❑U.S. Geological Survey (USGS)Hydrologic Atlas:
❑USGS NHD data.
❑USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps.
IUSGS map(s). Cite scale& quad name: Reepsville.
Natural Resources Conservation Service(MRCS) Soil Survey.
Citation: Lincoln County,NC
❑National wetlands inventory (NWI)map(s). Cite name:
❑ State/Local wetland inventory map(s):
❑ Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA)/Flood Insurance Rate Map(FIRM)maps:
❑ 100-year Floodplain Elevation is: (National Geodectic Vertical Datum of 1929)
❑Photographs: ❑Aerial(Name&Date):
❑ Other(Name&Date):
❑Previous deterrnination(s). File no. and date of response letter:
❑Applicable/supporting scientific literature:
® Other information(please specify): The site contains wetlands as determined by the 1987 Corps of Engineers Wetland
Delineation Manual and the Regional Supplement to the Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual:Eastern
7

Mountain and Piedmont Region(Version 2.0). The site also contains open water(impoundment).The impoundment
receives waters and/or flow directly into associated wetlands and/or stream.
IMPORTANT NOTE: The information recorded on this form has not necessarily been verified by the Corps and
should not be relied upon for later jurisdictional determinations.
David Brown,September 15,2021 In File with submitted JD Request
Signature and date of Regulatory Wildlands Engineering,Inc./Jordan Hessler
staff member completing (signed and dated request preliminary JD per agent
preliminary JD authorization)
Please sign this Preliminary JD Form. Keep a signed copy for your record and return a signed form to the Asheville
Regulatory Field Office by mail or e-mail.
US Army Corps of Engineers-Wilmington District
Asheville Regulatory Field Office
151 Patton Avenue,Room 208
Asheville,NC 28801-5006
1 Districts may establish timeframes for requester to return signed PJD forms. If the requester does not respond within the established time
frame, the district may presume concurrence and no additional follow up is necessary prior to finalizing an action.
8

Assessment Area - , , _.___ \_r `
Expanded Assessment Area 1 ��
t�' r Figure 3.4 711+11+1 r'Y' ` -
::: :rcoInstructl
Project Areas1s ■ . i 4 }';
Original Wetland Waters .0''e31 ■• ■ + ri° ""' `";...,., :, .,..., ,I I I gt.`'' OPENWATER2
°
Aop
MI Original Open Waters . F • ■ .. } _� �r
Expanded Wetlands ■ ■, : , nF„�ri,.l „�,1.,1�,i.,,, 1�„� ' # et i
Expanded Open Water '.. ■•t '• -■ j ,,' yy_�.�Er/_Air"' �.1�_ ` '
■
Non Wetland Waters (Perennial) ■ • Figure 3.3 / j
Non-project Streams _ '-■ •'•.. 1 1 • + ': I I
■
0
qy k ` . _-POTT CREEK
itil
m Ill -i' ' •. . • C -..- '-
-- ■ - - b'EN VV,� •
i r` ■ .
■ i•• •
i''� `` i --. 4/y
�' s
►� .
:. d. ' +'
..• \1 fir, '�'■ I
W:
., IV
„ye-,1, “ 'e'''' ji/
•
1.. '_ `. '
T. - .. ice- rJ, .-1 _
re-.sl l f•,ot 7,i'.-.-
41c,-,.-..-
•
j-r
�+o t}• • 00 i. r r '-` -
� s1, le
. �
N p
_ t fy 2018 Aerial Imagery
Figure 3.0: Delineation Map(Overview)
‘641a11111411r/W I L I] L A N I] S 0 200 400 Feet Wyant Lands Mitigation Site
E N G f N E E R I N G I I I Catawba River Basin 03050102
Map Created: 7/1/21
N
Lincoln County, NC

----,.__..4_.:, -,.; -.,-. :' .• • .i-- • - ...--. -,-,v=VP....•-„-,,.----'..--'7- . . • -i.,,,-, . ., oklite".•t-,
Tr .• r'• -.7- ...--:--,,,,,...r.i4- v-' -.--4': ----'2--L------ --iwohiedaa • • • - ', •..; . -:
• •: •- • --; , ob._Origi nal Assessment Area ..• . - •.'''' — ' . • ••••''4•-- . •
i.i.i.
• • ;,--- . _
z ' ' • - _ - „ •, ,
l Expanded Assessment Area ,,,
=
,
: •:--1,:. . .. •• . '.---"At' -.. •-:-..;.;.--- '•••....-... •
- - -. • ,••
- ...Project Parcels •,. .. ....i
,,_ .;-_•_•-- ' ,.. , . . • , - ' •- - -c,-.A,,:-,,,41,-6__,_:.•::‘,
Previously Constructed Project Areas -- _"L' '- Z,‘+'' ' -- ' '- '- ' ' " . L. ' ' ' ' ' . '''LL'\"4..W.t.:4'..‹*' ' 0.
..L .. ;i.'".Z''4 . • • 4 '. 4 4 4 .•"...""::. ,41i''' ,,L t'' Lr.1 Original Wetland Waters -_•;;:r • .- -- .
• '-L'.. -Ais••• ft v,r4. •._, - -,. ' - '- ''-'' . ., •
. ,
-,- • , __ •
. .
Original Open Waters _ 'ri.,..- , ,,-_.,. •.•---..-i-i.•tk, _ , . , .
•,,
, .
- -e -to...-. p•-,,:• $ • -. ' 1'
1 I Expanded Wetlands • _ . .
v- --•,.. •-. . f•-.. ..• ., ii, ./•••• • . • . • .
,..
. - '"31`4)'• ' • • ' ' ,"•?,--, .Z.,.‘1J--1 - ' -• - _-.. .
r Expanded Open Water
1 •-c•-. ' ., . ,:.<4,
. 0<-. - ' . po. * ;• 4 'I''' ., '
ctii
,,, , . 1:.It . . ,. • t t ' . -
. •
,.•''I :4'-
'11`r.....
— Project Streams . . ''''':'.. , ,..,c •''',...• .' • • '%-,vk''•• : , .. - j .. - • • -
..,,,,v .,. . , .. ••„ • , __,$.,•c• ‘.%.• if ,,,4:. '
, . -:i.•:•.- . i••'. --'r.i -?I',..7.'
Non-Project Streams :'5,-;•-"-?':.- --.,-- ,,_, .r 14`.:'''''' `,-# f'. . . •
7,.i, • . ..,..'• .. •.•'.:•.-F-- - :- , '5?- .
0 Stream Classification Point (SCP#)
. ,k.,,-,-; - . ',. '` . .''.4-•-‘'. .- r 4d..
'i.r.•''' - . . . ` ;.- • ' . .. . .0 Wetland Data Point (DP#) . ....„ .r .„.-
. . •.,. ..
or... .1.. ' .... 'fi •T : .14.'' - .
-.
. ii• ._ . . , ,
r. ' ' 11 li, •"......111.111".."._.. .jl., , . ...,, '
...,„„ . ,45. °qr. • ....4.
. .• , • • . ,, . .,-(146'' 4 • _ ..-- -, '%
09-'- '•;•/4"'Ilte ••' ''lte- j."-Lit l'IAlit4.1‘.14' • ,, , , , , 4k
— v_• -
T(0.160 AC)
AC)\..
iOlai :-...• qt,:t L L. ' ' . . . • . . -.
DP12.'
-.,. . r, .'.;) ,„• • ' a.
.--
APIF
z z.,
dr, _• ..
,:. .
. .... , •.4. ' ' . .#, .
••'. •.`'.1.C.-:4. . *4'6'; . • 0 • , 4r,or,gr irAr•-•
..;,..
r.,.4.0• t. - • ,.. ._ .
=, • . .
_ ...... . . ,,:,..
- III I 1111117:1111*:llllll Ili//HAIM- =
\
' -.. ... ..
.,,,iti.g.s,
Al
.
-.
, _ ._
. . •
' ' ' .4 •.:' = • 4
A- i'''.
.c - • . , .
..
, „. -)
... -,
• ,. .
L . • .-.,. . ,
Q(0315 AC) .:*-7'':,...'-::,....- . , .. „ 1. 4...-L • ‘ i •
4..-
• . . , '4. . \
. „ .
.1.
• .04 ..,Ar -.4.,..„..,.1...-.....,..`').. ' .-1,. , • -4_
...- 4.4! .._1.
.,•
-, ....... • ..,_ ._. .. LW. , .
• - i.,•..-..;r-il '.!yi'..4
,• ..r:;,......., 1..' •'".. _ v •'... • -
..
- L
* :Mier'.,, Li 44 1.''4`''ij.' -'•'.' r.
1,1, , 4, .
. ,.... • ' ..
- '- 4:7, is.• •••• ..,.f.:..r-,•,, ,.,
p
'' •it,'$ L. '"2 LI,L I:Li A LLL 1.1 ett 1;
K t.... -‘,..41 C.:41.:.-./- . ..,
...' - . -,4.1')ri.r L.'' ''• ,.":,•. C.';` 'it k,, 4:''i . ft; ' . 4 • 4 L.
,AJ,k'''''.e.4.''rr..'4:.4•I'' '' .'"''''" j'4'.' L...
t. L
WILDLANDS
Figure 3.4: Delineation Map
o 200 400 Feet
Wyant Lands Mitigation Site Expantion
ib
Catawba River Basin 03050102
ENGINEERING I I I Map Created: 7/1/21
N
Lincoln County, NC

NC WAM WETLAND ASSESSMENT FORM
Accompanies User Manual Version 5
USAGE AID#: NCDWR#:
Project Name Wyant Lands Mitigation Site Date of Evaluation 6/28/21
Applicant/Owner Name Wildlands Engineering Inc.(WEI) Wetland Site Name Wetland Q,R,S,and T
Wetland Type Bottomland Hardwood Forest Assessor Name/Organization J. Hessler(WEI)
Level III Ecoregion Piedmont Nearest Named Water Body Pott Creek
River Basin Catawba USGS 8-Digit Catalogue Unit 03050102
County Lincoln NCDWR Region Mooresville
Yes • No Precipitation within 48 hrs? Latitude/Longitude(deci-degrees) 35.530996/-81.313685
Evidence of stressors affecting the assessment area(may not be within the assessment area)
Please circle and/or make note on last page if evidence of stressors is apparent. Consider departure from reference,if
appropriate,in recent past(for instance,approximately within 10 years). Noteworthy stressors include,but are not limited
to the following.
• Hydrological modifications(examples: ditches,dams,beaver dams,dikes,berms,ponds,etc.)
• Surface and sub-surface discharges into the wetland(examples:discharges containing obvious pollutants,presence of nearby
septic tanks,underground storage tanks(USTs),hog lagoons,etc.)
• Signs of vegetation stress(examples: vegetation mortality,insect damage,disease,storm damage,salt intrusion,etc.)
• Habitat/plant community alteration(examples: mowing,clear-cutting,exotics,etc.)
Is the assessment area intensively managed? a Yes r No
Regulatory Considerations -Were regulatory considerations evaluated? a Yes (''No If Yes,check all that apply to the assessment area.
▪ Anadromous fish
▪ Federally protected species or State endangered or threatened species
NCDWR riparian buffer rule in effect
E Abuts a Primary Nursery Area(PNA)
• Publicly owned property
• N.C. Division of Coastal Management Area of Environmental Concern(AEC)(including buffer)
▪ Abuts a stream with a NCDWQ classification of SA or supplemental classifications of HQW,ORW,or Trout
• Designated NCNHP reference community
• Abuts a 303(d)-listed stream or a tributary to a 303(d)-listed stream
What type of natural stream is associated with the wetland,if any?(check all that apply)
Blackwater
Brownwater
▪ Tidal(if tidal,check one of the following boxes) Lunar Wind Both
Is the assessment area on a coastal island? r Yes is No
Is the assessment area's surface water storage capacity or duration substantially altered by beaver? - Yes . No
Does the assessment area experience overbank flooding during normal rainfall conditions? :Yes - No
1. Ground Surface Condition/Vegetation Condition—assessment area condition metric
Check a box in each column. Consider alteration to the ground surface(GS)in the assessment area and vegetation structure
(VS)in the assessment area. Compare to reference wetland if applicable(see User Manual). If a reference is not applicable,
then rate the assessment area based on evidence of an effect.
GS VS
( A ( A Not severely altered
(i B (i B Severely altered over a majority of the assessment area(ground surface alteration examples: vehicle tracks,excessive
sedimentation,fire-plow lanes,skidder tracks,bedding,fill,soil compaction,obvious pollutants)(vegetation structure
alteration examples: mechanical disturbance,herbicides,salt intrusion[where appropriate],exotic species,grazing,
less diversity[if appropriate],hydrologic alteration)
2. Surface and Sub-Surface Storage Capacity and Duration—assessment area condition metric
Check a box in each column. Consider surface storage capacity and duration(Surf)and sub-surface storage capacity and
duration (Sub). Consider both increase and decrease in hydrology. A ditch<_1 foot deep is considered to affect surface water only,
while a ditch >1 foot deep is expected to affect both surface and sub-surface water.Consider tidal flooding regime,if applicable.
Surf Sub
r A ("A Water storage capacity and duration are not altered.
B (' B Water storage capacity or duration are altered,but not substantially(typically,not sufficient to change vegetation).
is C 6'C Water storage capacity or duration are substantially altered(typically,alteration sufficient to result in vegetation
change)(examples:draining,flooding,soil compaction,filling,excessive sedimentation,underground utility lines).
3. Water Storage/Surface Relief—assessment area/wetland type condition metric(skip for all marshes)
Check a box in each column for each group below. Select the appropriate storage for the assessment area(AA)and the wetland
type(WT).
AA WT
3a. i A (`A Majority of wetland with depressions able to pond water>1 foot deep
("B ("B Majority of wetland with depressions able to pond water 6 inches to 1 foot deep
cc cc Majority of wetland with depressions able to pond water 3 to 6 inches deep
{i D {i D Depressions able to pond water<3 inches deep
3b. C A Evidence that maximum depth of inundation is greater than 2 feet
( B Evidence that maximum depth of inundation is between 1 and 2 feet
6'C Evidence that maximum depth of inundation is less than 1 foot

4. Soil Texture/Structure—assessment area condition metric(skip for all marshes)
Check a box from each of the three soil property groups below. Dig soil profile in the dominant assessment area landscape
feature. Make soil observations within the 12 inches. Use most recent National Technical Committee for Hydric Soils guidance for
regional indicators.
4a. (`A Sandy soil
B Loamy or clayey soils exhibiting redoximorphic features(concentrations,depletions,or rhizospheres)
C Loamy or clayey soils not exhibiting redoximorphic features
{ D Loamy or clayey gleyed soil
C E Histosol or histic epipedon
4b. (T A Soil ribbon<1 inch
C B Soil ribbon>_1 inch
4c. (+A No peat or muck presence
B A peat or muck presence
5. Discharge into Wetland—opportunity metric
Check a box in each column. Consider surface pollutants or discharges(Surf)and sub-surface pollutants or discharges(Sub).
Examples of sub-surface discharges include presence of nearby septic tank,underground storage tank(UST),etc.
Surf Sub
A ti A Little or no evidence of pollutants or discharges entering the assessment area
is B ( B Noticeable evidence of pollutants or discharges entering the wetland and stressing,but not overwhelming the
treatment capacity of the assessment area
cc '^C Noticeable evidence of pollutants or discharges(pathogen,particulate,or soluble)entering the assessment area and
potentially overwhelming the treatment capacity of the wetland(water discoloration,dead vegetation,excessive
sedimentation,odor)
6. Land Use—opportunity metric(skip for non-riparian wetlands)
Check all that apply(at least one box in each column). Evaluation involves a GIS effort with field adjustment. Consider sources
draining to assessment area within entire upstream watershed(WS),within 5 miles and within the watershed draining to the
assessment area(5M),and within 2 miles and within the watershed draining to the assessment area(2M). Effective riparian buffers
are considered to be 50 feet wide in the Coastal Plain and Piedmont ecoregions and 30 feet wide in the Blue Ridge Mountains ecoregion.
WS 5M 2M
r A r A r A >_10%impervious surfaces
r B r B r B Confined animal operations(or other local,concentrated source of pollutants)
r C r C r C >_20%coverage of pasture
r D r D r D >_20%coverage of agricultural land(regularly plowed land)
r E r E r E >_20%coverage of maintained grass/herb
r F r F r F >_20%coverage of clear-cut land
r G r G r G Little or no opportunity to improve water quality. Lack of opportunity may result from little or no disturbance in
the watershed or hydrologic alterations that prevent dainage and/or overbank flow from affectio the
assessment area.
7. Wetland Acting as Vegetated Buffer—assessment area/wetland complex condition metric(skip for non-riparian wetlands)
7a. Is assessment area within 50 feet of a tributary or other open water?
. Yes No If Yes,continue to 7b. If No,skip to Metric 8.
7b. How much of the first 50 feet from the bank is weltand? (Wetland buffer need only be present on one side of the water body. Make
buffer judgment based on the average width of wetland. Record a note if a portion of the buffer has been removed or disturbed.)
(- A >_50 feet
( B From 30 to<50 feet
{i C From 15 to<30 feet
( D From 5 to<15 feet
C E <5 feet or buffer bypassed by ditches
7c. Tributary width. If the tributary is anastomosed,combine widths of channels/braids for a total width.
( <_15-feet wide (" >15-feet wide {+ Other open water(no tributary present)
7d. Do roots of assessment area vegetation extend into the bank of the tributary/open water?
(i Yes (' No
7e. Is tributary or other open water sheltered or exposed?
iT Sheltered—adjacent open water with width<2500 feet and no regular boat traffic.
Exposed—adjacent open water with width>_2500 feet or regular boat traffic.
8. Wetland Width at the Assessment Area—wetland type/wetland complex condition metric(evaluate WT for all marshes
and Estuarine Woody Wetland only;evaluate WC for Bottomland Hardwood Forest, Headwater Forest,and Riverine Swamp
Forest only)
Check a box in each column. Select the average width for the wetland type at the assessment area(WT) and the wetland complex at the
assessment area(WC). See User Manual for WT and WC boundaries.
WT WC
C A i A >_100 feet
("B C B From 80 to<100 feet
( C (''C From 50 to<80 feet
cc cc From 40 to<50 feet
( E C E From 30 to<40 feet
C F F From 15 to<30 feet
("G ("G From 5 to<15 feet
CH CH <5 feet

9. Inundation Duration—assessment area condition metric(skip for non-riparian wetlands)
Answer for assessment area dominant landform.
r-A Evidence of short-duration inundation(<7 consecutive days)
{ B Evidence of saturation,without evidence of inundation
C Evidence of long-duration inundation or very long-duration inundation(7 to 30 consecutive days or more)
10. Indicators of Deposition—assessment area condition metric(skip for non-riparian wetlands and all marshes)
Consider recent deposition only(no plant growth since deposition).
r-A Sediment deposition is not excessive,but at approximately natural levels.
(i B Sediment deposition is excessive,but not overwhelming the wetland.
{ C Sediment deposition is excessive and is overwhelming the wetland.
11. Wetland Size—wetland type/wetland complex condition metric
Check a box in each column. Involves a GIS effort with field adjustment. This metric evaluates three aspects of the wetland area:the
size of the wetland type(WT),the size of the wetland complex(WC),and the size of the forested wetland(FW)(if applicable,see User
Manual). See the User Manual for boundaries of these evaluation areas. If assessment area is clear-cut,select"K"for the FW column.
WT WC FW(if applicable)
(_A A A >_500 acres
(-' B ( B r-B From 100 to<500 acres
• C C ("C From 50 to<100 acres
r- D ( D (-D From 25 to<50 acres
r- E ('E r-E From 10 to<25 acres
F r F (-F From 5 to<10 acres
r-G ('G ("`G From 1 to<5 acres
H 4H (" H From 0.5 to<1 acre
▪ I I (- I From 0.1 to<0.5 acre
• J ( J C J From 0.01 to<0.1 acre
K ( K K <0.01 acre or assessment area is clear-cut
12. Wetland Intactness—wetland type condition metric(evaluate for Pocosins only)
A Pocosin is the full extent(>_90%)of its natural landscape size.
B Pocosin is<90%of the full extent of its natural landscape size.
13. Connectivity to Other Natural Areas—landscape condition metric
13a. Check appropriate box(es)(a box may be checked in each column). Involves a GIS effort with field adjustment. This
evaluates whether the wetland is well connected(Well)and/or loosely connected(Loosely)to the landscape patch,the contiguous
metric naturally vegetated area and open water(if appropriate). Boundaries are formed by four-lane roads,regularly maintained utility
line corridors the width of a four-lane road or wider,urban landscapes,fields(pasture open and agriculture),or water>300 feet wide.
Well Loosely
CA CA >_500 acres
(-13 (-B From 100 to<500 acres
C (-C From 50 to<100 acres
D ( D From 10 to<50 acres
E (:E <10 acres
F (`F Wetland type has a poor or no connection to other natural habitats
13b. Evaluate for marshes only.
Yes i__No Wetland type has a surface hydrology connection to open waters/stream or tidal wetlands.
14. Edge Effect—wetland type condition metric(skip for all marshes and Estuarine Woody Wetland)
May involve a GIS effort with field adjustment. Estimate distance from wetland type boundary to artificial edges. Artificial edges include
non-forested areas >_40 feet wide such as fields,development,roads,regularly maintained utility line corridors and clear-cuts. Consider
the eight main points of the compass. Artificial edge occurs within 150 feet in how many directiions? If the assessment area is clear-cut,
select option"C."
CA 0
C B 1 to 4
(:C 5to8
15. Vegetative Composition—assessment area condition metric(skip for all marshes and Pine Flat)
r-A Vegetation is close to reference condition in species present and their proportions. Lower strata composed of appropriate
species,with exotic plants absent or sparse within the assessment area.
( B Vegetation is different from reference condition in species diversity or proportions,but still largely composed of native species
characteristic of the wetland type. This may include communities of weedy native species that develop after clearcutting or
clearing. It also includes communities with exotics present,but not dominant,over a large portion of the expected strata.
C Vegetation severely altered from reference in composition,or expected species are unnaturally absent(planted stands of non-
characteristic species or at least one stratum inappropriately composed of a single species),or exotic species are dominant in
at least one stratum.
16. Vegetative Diversity—assessment area condition metric(evaluate for Non-tidal Freshwater Marsh only)
( A Vegetation diversity is high and is composed primarily of native species(<10%cover of exotics).
( B Vegetation diversity is low or has>10%to 50%cover of exotics.
( C Vegetation is dominated by exotic species(>50%cover of exotics).

17. Vegetative Structure—assessment area/wetland type condition metric
17a. Is vegetation present?
(: Yes (' No If Yes,continue to 17b. If No,skip to Metric 18.
17b. Evaluate percent coverage of assessment area vegetation for all marshes only. Skip to 17c for non-marsh wetlands.
("A >_25%coverage of vegetation
i c_ B <25%coverage of vegetation
17c. Check a box in each column for each stratum. Evaluate this portion of the metric for non-marsh wetlands. Consider structure
in airspace above the assessment area(AA)and the wetland type(WT)separately.
AA WT
o r`A ('`A Canopy closed,or nearly closed,with natural gaps associated with natural processes
c (' B ( B Canopy present,but opened more than natural gaps
U C ( C Canopy sparse or absent
o t A ( A Dense mid-story/sapling layer
in ("B ("B Moderate density mid-story/sapling layer
2 i':C (+C Mid-story/sapling layer sparse or absent
C A ('`A Dense shrub layer
2 r`B (' B Moderate density shrub layer
• (i C (:C Shrub layer sparse or absent
a A (:A Dense herb layer
• r-B ('`B Moderate density herb layer
C ('`C Herb layer sparse or absent
18. Snags—wetland type condition metric(skip for all marshes)
A Large snags(more than one)are visible(>12-inches DBH,or large relative to species present and landscape stability).
ii B Not A
19. Diameter Class Distribution—wetland type condition metric(skip for all marshes)
A Majority of canopy trees have stems>6 inches in diameter at breast height(DBH);many large trees(>12 inches DBH)are
present.
( B Majority of canopy trees have stems between 6 and 12 inches DBH,few are>12-inch DBH.
(:C Majority of canopy trees are<6 inches DBH or no trees.
20. Large Woody Debris—wetland type condition metric(skip for all marshes)
Include both natural debris and man-placed natural debris.
A Large logs(more than one)are visible(>12 inches in diameter,or large relative to species present and landscape stability).
ii B Not A
21. Vegetation/Open Water Dispersion—wetland type/open water condition metric(evaluate for Non-Tidal Freshwater
Marsh only)
Select the figure that best describes the amount of interspersion between vegetation and open water in the growing season. Patterned
areas indicate vegetated areas,while solid white areas indicate open water.
A B (`C D
22. Hydrologic Connectivity—assessment area condition metric (evaluate for riparian wetlands and Salt/Brackish Marsh only)
Examples of activities that may severely alter hydrologic connectivity include intensive ditching,fill,sedimentation,channelization,
diversion, man-made berms, beaver dams,and stream incision. Documentation required if evaluated as B, C,or D.
( A Overbank and overland flow are not severely altered in the assessment area.
( B Overbank flow is severely altered in the assessment area.
( C Overland flow is severely altered in the assessment area.
D Both overbank and overland flow are severely altered in the assessment area.
Notes
Wetland classification is based on the reference wetland type that on-site wetlands would become if not maintained.

NC WAM Wetland Rating Sheet
Accompanies User Manual Version 5.0
Wetland Site Name Wetland Q,R,S,and T Date 6/28/21
Wetland Type Bottomland Hardwood Forest Assessor Name/Organization J. Hessler(WEI)
Notes on Field Assessment Form(Y/N) YES
Presence of regulatory considerations(Y/N) NO
Wetland is intensively managed(Y/N) YES
Assessment area is located within 50 feet of a natural tributary or other open water (Y/N) YES
Assessment area is substantially altered by beaver(Y/N) NO
Assessment area experiences overbank flooding during normal rainfall conditions (Y/N) YES
Assessment area is on a coastal island (Y/N) NO
Sub-function Rating Summary
Function Sub-function Metrics Rating
Hydrology Surface Storage and Retention Condition LOW
Sub-Surface Storage and Retention Condition MEDIUM
Water Quality Pathogen Change Condition LOW
Condition/Opportunity LOW
Opportunity Presence?(Y/N) NO
Particulate Change Condition LOW
Condition/Opportunity LOW
Opportunity Presence?(Y/N) NO
Soluble Change Condition LOW
Condition/Opportunity LOW
Opportunity Presence?(Y/N) NO
Physical Change Condition LOW
Condition/Opportunity LOW
Opportunity Presence?(Y/N) NO
Pollution Change Condition NA
Condition/Opportunity NA
Opportunity Presence?(Y/N) NA
Habitat Physical Structure Condition LOW
Landscape Patch Structure Condition LOW
Vegetation Composition Condition LOW
Function Rating Summary
Function Metrics/Notes Rating
Hydrology Condition LOW
Water Quality Condition LOW
Condition/Opportunity LOW
Opportunity Presence?(Y/N) NO
Habitat Condition LOW
Overall Wetland Rating LOW

APPENDIX 6 A
Amendment Supplementary Design Info

Cross Section 15,UT2 Reach 1
Riffle
831 —
829
c
., +
w 827
825
0 10 20 30 40
Width(ft)
Existing Conditions —Bankfull —Floodprone Area
Bankfull Dimensions
5.0 x-section area(ft.sq.)
8.3 width(ft)
0.6 mean depth(ft)
0.9 max depth(ft) ;"'�` ?,t,.` l ,i1;
8.6 wetted perimeter(ft) a ; :5:r "
0.6 hyd radi(ft) •`: ='
13.8 width depth ratio t •; rS'' ,
19.6 W flood prone area(ft) 4,..,,,,I;
^ �,+,: ::*� y -.
2.4 entrenchment ratio v : `f ==• f'�� r
2.0 low bank height ratio s<.1;4 rr. , .., :. _4"•: s - - r
"
Survey Date: September 2021 -- ,,:' x� ; - ;' ,• '_ =
Field Crew: Wildlands Engineeringi, Y.n c 1, r► �5 f ‘;1''-v
View Upstream

Cross Section 16 Pool,UT2 Reach 1
Pool
830
$ 828 •
' 826
824
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45
Width(ft)
Existing Conditions —Bankfull
i �F'_ is �"�. '"[. ".�••:• r
Bankfull Dimensions -• ' '3.6 x-section area(ft.sq.) • • _ _
4.8 width(ft) y t" °
•
0.7 mean depth(ft) S�!
1.4 max depth(ft)
6.0 wetted perimeter(ft)
0.6 hyd radi(ft)
6.5 width-depth ratio •
1.8 low bank height ratio :
•
St 4k.
Survey Date: September 2021 .+' -
Field Crew: Wildlands Engineering F' ::ti`• -
View Downstream

Groundwater Gage Plots
Wyant Land Mitigation Site Additional Wetland Credit Area
DMS Project No. 100595
Pre-Construction-2021
Addendum
Wyant Addendum Groundwater Gage#101
0 Pre-Construction-2021 0
(0 0
a.,
5 — Ln , Ln 10
N
N •
N
0 T!_ o - - - - I -- ° \ -- — -- 9
N - o 0 0
m
w —
° ° - 8
t✓
5 m °
N w
- 7
c -10 6
w o
3 -15 5 as
V
-20 , 4 ia
- 3
-25
- 2
-30
I - 1
-35 I I I I I -II ,�- II - ' �II - i I I I 0
C - - T C — Up 0_ > V
Ll Q 5 - a cn o z 0
Daily Precipitation Gage#101 Reference Gage Depth — —Criteria Level o Soil Surface

MONITORING GAUGE INSTALLATION DATA SHEET
Project Name: Wyant Addendum
Project Location: Wyant Lands Mitigation Site
Purpose of Gauge: Water Table Monitoring
Gauge Description:
Gauge ID: 101
Serial Number: 831065
Total Well Casing Length(A): N/A
Well Casing Height Above Ground(B): 1.84'
Distance From Eye Bolt To Probe Sensor 6.87
Material: 2"PVC Well Screen
Type of Measurement: Pressure,Temperature, &Depth
Type of Logger: In-Situ Level Troll 100
Gauge Location: Addendum Wetalnd
Notes:
Free water 1.8'
Soil Profile Description at Location of Well:
Depth Range(in.) Color Redox Texture Notes
0-1.1' 7.5YR 4/6 Silt Loam Oxidized rhizomes
1.1'-2.2' 10YR 3/1 -80% 5YR 7/8-20% Clay Loam
2.2-3.7' 10YR 5/1 -55% 10YR 5/8-45% Clay
3.7'-4.5' 10YR 5/6-60% 10YR 5/1 -40% Sandy Clay
4.5"-5.0' Gley 1 5/10Y-95% 5YR 5/8-5% Sandy Clay
B
A
�/ 1

Groundwater Gage Plots
Wyant Land Mitigation Site Additional Wetland Credit Area
DMS Project No. 100595
Pre-Construction-2021
Addendum
c Wyant Addendum Groundwater Gage#103
o Pre-Construction-2021
m o
N 0
10 OD N N T 10
NI C
N
O 0
o N 3 NI
9
U o
0 — — — w m a o o — — o , — — --
o ,-
t o - 8
CO
w
7
10
6
> oc
3 -20 - 5 as
y ii
V
$11VS411\04:\
`° - 4 Iv
� a
30 -
- 3
- 2
40
I - 1
50 I I I I I I ,I- I I - ' 1 II - i - 1 I I 0
C - - T C — Up 0_ > V
U Q 5 - Q (n 0 z 0
Daily Precipitation Gage#103 — —Criteria Level o Soil Surface

MONITORING GAUGE INSTALLATION DATA SHEET
Project Name: Wyant Addendum
Project Location: Wyant Lands Mitigation Site
Purpose of Gauge: Water Table Monitoring
Gauge Description:
Gauge ID: 103
Serial Number: -
Total Well Casing Length(A): N/A
Well Casing Height Above Ground(B): 1.73
Distance From Eye Bolt To Probe Sensor -
Material: 2"PVC Well Screen
Type of Measurement: Pressure,Temperature, &Depth
Type of Logger: In-Situ Level Troll 100
Gauge Location: Addendum Wetalnd
Notes:
Free water 3.9'
Soil Profile Description at Location of Well:
Depth Range(in.) Color Redox Texture Notes
0-1.95' 7.5YR 5/4 Silt Loam
1.95'-2.6' 10YR 5/1 -90% 2.5YR 4/8-10% Clay Sand
2.6'-3.5' 7.5YR 5/1 -70% 10YR 6/8-30% Sandy Clay
3.5'-4.2' Gley 1 4/N-60% 5YR 4/6-40% Sandy Clay
4.2'-5.2' 10YR 6/8-70% Gley 1 6/N-30% Clay
B
A
�/ 1

Groundwater Gage Plots
Wyant Land Mitigation Site Additional Wetland Credit Area
DMS Project No. 100595
Pre-Construction-2021
Addendum
o Wyant Addendum Groundwater Gage#104
v Pre-Construction-2021 r,
n to N
—
. \ 3 \ 10
o N- o
10 — ( m - w , 9
0 0
c
CO LU - g
cn
0 — — i------ --
i67
w -10 - o
J . 5 as
m - 4 v
-20 a
- 3
)11404:ii\i:IS \A\ Z
30 2
- 1
-40 I I I I I --I ,I- 1 I . - I - . I I I 0
C - - T C — Up 0_ > V
U a) Q 5 -co Q (n 0 z 0
Daily Precipitation Gage#104 — —Criteria Level o Soil Surface

MONITORING GAUGE INSTALLATION DATA SHEET
Project Name: Wyant Addendum
Project Location: Wyant Lands Mitigation Site
Purpose of Gauge: Water Table Monitoring
Gauge Description:
Gauge ID: 104
Serial Number: 831570
Total Well Casing Length(A): N/A
Well Casing Height Above Ground(B): 1.73
Distance From Eye Bolt To Probe Sensor 6.75
Material: 2"PVC Well Screen
Type of Measurement: Pressure,Temperature, &Depth
Type of Logger: In-Situ Level Troll 100
Gauge Location: Addendum Wetalnd
Notes:
Free water 2.8'
Soil Profile Description at Location of Well:
Depth Range(in.) Color Redox Texture Notes
0-1.3' 5YR 5/6 Silt Loam
1.3'-2.0' 10YR 5/3-85% 2.5YR 6/8-15% Clay Loam
2.0'-2.7' 2.5Y 6/3-55% 10YR 6/8-45% Silt Clay
2.7-5.0 Gley 1 5/10Y-50% 7.5YR 7/8-50% Clay
B
A
�/ 1

MONITORING GAUGE INSTALLATION DATA SHEET
Project Name: Wyant Addendum
Project Location: Wyant Lands Mitigation Site
Purpose of Gauge: Water Table Monitoring
Gauge Description:
Gauge ID: 102
Serial Number: -
Total Well Casing Length(A): N/A
Well Casing Height Above Ground(B): 1.94'
Distance From Eye Bolt To Probe Sensor -
Material: 2"PVC Well Screen
Type of Measurement: Pressure,Temperature, &Depth
Type of Logger: In-Situ Level Troll 100
Gauge Location: Addendum Wetalnd
Notes:
Free water 4.0'
Soil Profile Description at Location of Well:
Depth Range(in.) Color Redox Texture Notes
0-1.9' 5Y 4/4 Clay Loam
1.9'-2.8' 5Y 2.5/1 90% 7.5YR-10% Clay Loam
2.8'-3.5' 10YR 4/1 -60% 7.5YR 6/8-40% Clay
3.5'-5.0' 10YR 3/2-55% 10YR 5/8-45% Clay
B
A
�/ 1

=�~
io
Project Parcels
Recorded Conservation Easement
Proposed Conservation Easement
ZQ
Proposed Wetland Creation
Proposed Wetland Reestablishment 6.
Proposed Wetland Rehabilitation
Soil Borings
EN
Is V
BI
91
ov
A. 2015 Aerial Imagery
VVyam Lands Proposed Contract Amendment
Exhibit Soil Boring Map
O 160 300Feet \ VVyamLand, Mitigation Site
WILDLANDS | / | �
.N,,,.°" Catawba River Basin 03050102
�J (03050103 Expanded Service Area)
Lincoln County, NC
/a

WILDLANDS EI'J F_ GIh1fFRINO
Wyant Lands Potential Expansion Limited Hydric Soils Investigation
Anticipated
Grading Depth
Boring Description to Hydric
0 to 0.5' Chroma 3 or less, Likely hydric
BH1 0.5 to 1.0' 10YR 4/5, 15%gleyed inclusions 0"
1.2'+ Fully Gleyed, Reduced, Hydric
BH2 0 to 2' NH 14"
2'+ Hydric Gleyed Layer
BH3 0 to 1.5' NH 8"
1.6'+ Hydric Gleyed Layer
0 to 0.5' Chroma 3 or less, Likely hydric
BH4 0.5 to 1.0' 10YR 4/5, 15%gleyed inclusions 0"
1.5'+ Borderline Hydric, Light Brown non-gleyed lots of mottling
BH5 0.3' Hydric 0"
BH6 0.3' Hydric 0"
0 to 0.5' Hydric/Borderline Hydric
BH7 0.5 to 1.8' Borderline, Silty Clay Loam 11.5"
1.8'+ Hydric, Light Brown non-gleyed lots of mottling, Fat Clay
0 to 0.5' Chroma 3 or less, Likely hydric
BH8 0.5 to 1.5' Borderline, Silty Clay Loam 8"
1.5'+ Borderline Hydric, Light Brown non-gleyed lots of mottling
0 to 0.5' Chroma 3 or less, Likely hydric
BH9 0.5 to 2.3' Borderline, Silty Clay Loam 0"
2.3'+ Hydric, Light Brown non-gleyed lots of mottling
0 to 0.5' Chroma 3 or less, Likely hydric
BH10 0.5 to 2.3' Borderline, Silty Clay Loam 0"
2.3'+ Hydric, Light Brown non-gleyed lots of mottling
0 to 0.5' Chroma 3
BH11 0.5 to 1.7' Borderline, Silty Clay Loam 0"
1.7'+ Borderline Hydric, Light Brown non-gleyed lots of mottling

S&
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
EClimo 1 t ii Ride: R,md • RA.h•t<_°h, North C.troiuu 2'614 • P ith:i'iifi,N4 -,i i3I . f i 011el! ,-Ih-`a4i-'
PRELIMINARY HYDRIC SOIL INVESTIGATION
Wyant Project Site
2847 Wyant Rd., Vale, NC
Piedmont
Catawba River Basin
Catawba County, North Carolina
Prepared for:
Mr. Eric Neuhaus
Wildlands
312 West Milibrook Road, Suite 225
Raleigh, NC 27609 1
EY'01/414 . i> l'
ari,
, ,/ "fly _2i:it •7
', ls , ,:/s /. ..,..,,.:
rvlr
,. ,,,-4-
qtArmili
November 18th,2017
1

INTRODUCTION
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA(S&EC, PA)was retained to perform a preliminary evaluation to
assess the presence and extent of hydric soils onsite. There are a number of field ditches that dissect the
site. Most of the area evaluated is currently planted in soybeans but some of the area is in pasture.
METHODOLOGY
On November 13th, 2017 Kevin Martin (LSS, PWS) of S&EC, PA performed a soil evaluation at the site.
Hand auger borings were advanced on the property at locations as appropriate to approximately estimate
the location and extent of hydric soils within the project area (see attached Approximate Hydric Soil
Locations Map). Each soil boring was evaluated to assess the presence or absence of hydric soil
indicators. Hydric soil indicators were identified utilizing the NRCS Field Indicators of Hydric Soils in the
Unities States-A Guide for Identifying and Delineating Hydric Soils (Version 7.0, 2010).
All areas evaluated are mapped as the Chewacla soil series (Fine-loamy, mixed, active, thermic
Fluvaquentic Dystrudepts) by NRCS. Most hydric soils observed onsite were fine loamy or clayey and are
most like the Wehadkee (Fine-loamy, mixed, active, nonacid, thermic Fluvaquentic Endoaquepts) soil
series.
RESULTS
Numerous soil borings were performed within the study area. Soil characteristics were evaluated
and all areas identified as containing hydric soils met the hydric soil criteria described below.
An X" on the map indicates soil boring location and depth to hydric soil indicators, except in H2
area where the " indicate thickness of the depleted layer from the surface downward.
U-are non hydric soil areas
H- are hydric soils areas containing a depleted matrix.
C- are buried hydric soils due to "crowning' of the fields. Crowned material ranges from 12" to
18" thick in most areas. A depleted matrix is present beneath the material used to crown the
field.
H2- areas have hydric soil indicators (a depleted matrix) but only in the top 2 to 4" of the soil
profile. This area may have been a natural depression in the floodplain or may have been created
over time by manipulation of the area and by ponding caused in part by a man made levee
adjacent to a ditch.
Indicator F3: Depleted Matrix
Technical Description: A layer that has a depleted matrix with 60 percent
or more chroma of 2 or less and that has a minimum thickness of either:
(a) 2 in. (5 cm) if the 2 in. (5 cm) is entirely within the upper 6 in. (15 cm)
of the soil, or
2

(b) 6 in. (15 cm) starting within 10 in. (25 cm) of the soil surface,
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
While all of the borings performed within areas identified as hydric soils on the attached map
exhibited hydric soil indicators, many areas containing hydric soils did not exhibit Primary
Wetland Hydrology or Secondary Wetland Hydrology Indicators. Except that part of the
evaluation area was flooded at the time of the evaluation.
3

--Kw ► ,»,•,..-i
/7
/
- Project Location y
Proposed Conservation Easement(37.8 Acres)
\\ Temporary Construction Easement _ _
Topographic Contour 5' � '`
k
Existing Ditch7 I,
30 + t
I
n Soils Investigation I 1
®0„ I ' 1
- C-Buried Hydric(2.9 Acres) I ®15
F i;
I i
■ H-Hydric(8.6 Acres) , :: f
ii U-Not Hydic(1.7 Acres) 0911 lc\� it '
H2-Shallow Hydric(1.5 Acres) ®1 0�� ®$„ '\ \ \\.\\
® Soil Study Borings
�ti , t
fit•
Y a
t
VII\I) [II,
ro ®4„ 012" ! t
.�
- � ®On gin. _.
®16" '
®2" � I
--"--)
I .P �� 1
i
SiillN\:\:...\ii
i- ,,
®16" i ,\ -i: I. /
.AV, . ..
• _ (1
, \i,;1111 . -,
:- v4tc t.
t . i.. 4i.
lir �1
_ ter .. r r�. e'er,, .�ir �; ,0
a•
la
�~ r \ .
g WYANT CREEK REACH 4 _ _ ,
®4" .
- , • ..11,41„-‘ , ...
\ -'+ \-\\\-k ®2"
\. " . r„. -...„
r7..:. ://;
.go, : r
/ to
..tt ._ : x .1„ „.
y r 2015 Aerial Image
Soils Study Exhibit
�► W I L D L A N D 5 0 50 100 200 300 400 Feet
Wyant Lands Mitigation Site
ENGINEERING \ Catawba River Basin (03050102)
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I V Cat 03 Extended Service Area-Warm NonTLW
N Lincoln County, NC

S& Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
EC Imo RIM Ridge Road • Raleigh. Nardi Carolina 27614 • Phone:[phone] • Fax:(919)N46.94i 7
LLI4'w,$llIlC1 EG.c❑Ill
DETAILED HYDRIC SOIL INVESTIGATION
Wyant Project Site
2847 Wyant Rd., Vale, NC
Piedmont
Catawba River Basin
Catawba County, North Carolina
Prepared for:
Mr. Eric Neuhaus
Wildlands
312 West Millbrook Road, Suite 225
Raleigh, NC 27609 .. �.
SOIL se
-0 .0c.4614,4A
.„„ / —
P W5� Wu.
-u t1 � .
90 xEviN C.MARTIN000851
r
‘#FIVORDiCii
•—wok WET109
March 11th, 2019
1

INTRODUCTION
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA (S&EC, PA) was retained to perform a detailed evaluation to
assess the presence and extent of hydric soils onsite. There are a number of field ditches that dissect the
site. Most of the area evaluated was not planted but some of the area is in pasture.
METHODOLOGY
On February 7th, 2019 Kevin Martin (LSS, PWS) of S&EC, PA performed a soil evaluation at the site. Eighty
five hand auger borings were advanced on the property at locations as appropriate to approximately
estimate the location and extent of hydric soils within the project area(see attached Soil Study Exhibit).
Each soil boring was evaluated to assess the presence or absence of hydric soil indicators. Hydric soil
indicators were identified utilizing the NRCS Field Indicators of Hydric Soils in the Unities States-A Guide
for Identifying and Delineating Hydric Soils(Version 8.1, 2017).
All areas evaluated are mapped as the Chewacla soil series (Fine-loamy, mixed, active, thermic
Fluvaquentic Dystrudepts) by NRCS. Most hydric soils observed onsite were fine loamy or clayey and are
most like the Wehadkee (Fine-loamy, mixed, active, nonacid, thermic Fluvaquentic Endoaquepts) soil
series.
RESULTS
Eighty five soil borings were performed within the study area. Soil characteristics were evaluated
and all areas identified as containing hydric soils met the hydric soil criteria described below.
An "X" with a circle around it on the map indicates soil boring location and the depth below
current land surface to hydric soil indicators.
U- are non hydric soil areas (most like Congaree Series)
H- are hydric soils areas containing a depleted matrix (F3 indicator). Most Like Wehadkee Series)
C- are buried hydric soils due to "crowning" of the fields. Crowned material ranges from 12" to
18" thick in most areas. A depleted matrix is present beneath the material used to crown the
field. (Most like Chewacla Series)
H2- areas have hydric soil indicator F3 (a depleted matrix) but only in the top 2" to 4" of the soil
profile. This area may have been a natural depression in the floodplain or may have been created
over time by manipulation of the area and by ponding caused in part by a man made levee
adjacent to a ditch. (most like Mullers Series).
Indicator F3: Depleted Matrix
Technical Description: A layer that has a depleted matrix with 60 percent
or more chroma of 2 or less and that has a minimum thickness of either:
(a) 2 in. (5 cm) if the 2 in. (5 cm) is entirely within the upper 6 in. (15 cm)
of the soil, or
2

/b\ b in. (15 crn) starting within lO in. /25 onn\ of the SOi| surface.
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
While all of the borings performed within areas identified as hydric soils on the attached map
exhibited hydric soil indicators, most areas containing hydric soils did not exhibit Primary
Wetland Or Secondary Wetland Hydrology Indicators.
3

Typical Soil Profiles
WEHADKEE SERIES
(Actual Location B7 in a H soil area)
The Wehadkee series consists of very deep, poorly drained and very poorly drained
soils on flood plains along streams that drain from the mountains and piedmont.
TAXONOMIC CLASS: Fine-loamy, mixed, active, nonacid, thermic Fluvaquentic
Endoaquepts
A--O to 14 inches; dark grayish brown (10YR 4/2) with 20% reddish brown (5YR 4/4)
redox concentrations occurring as Fe masses, clay loam.
Most Like Mullers SERIES
(Mullers is not mapped in NC but is found in SC, no NC soil series really fits the
description)
(Actual Location B75 in a H2 soil area)
TAXONOMIC CLASS: Fine, kaolinitic, acid, thermic Fluventic Endoaquept
Ap--0 to 3 inches; very dark grayish brown (10YR 4/2). 2 to 5% oxidized rhizospheres
and/or pore linings 7.5YR 4/6, sandy clay loam
Bw1--3 to 16 inches; brown (10YR 5/3), strong brown (7.5YR 4/6) & reddish brown
(5YR 4/4), sandy clay loam
Bw2g-16 to 24+ inches—dark gray (5Y 4/1), 10% strong brown (7.5YR 4/6), clay loam
Most Like Chewacla SERIES
(Actual Location B8 in a C soil area)
TAXONOMIC CLASS: Fine-loamy, mixed, active, thermic Fluvaquentic Dystrudepts
A--O to 15 inches; Brown (10YR 5/3), 30% brown (7.5YR 4/4) clay loam.
Ab--15 to 21+ inches; dark grayish brown (10YR 4/2) with 20% reddish brown (5YR 4/4)
redox concentrations occurring as Fe masses, clay loam.

III f
• •
- Project Location II;.
Proposed Conservation Easement(37.8 Acres) �i
1/2
Temporary Construction Easement • ►��B0-0" �•
•
• ti
54 •
Topographic Contour 5' ►�� ►�� a• = ; r
1/2
Existing DitchP!iiii°1 I II II'
►:�B3-0" 0139-0" IgN 22 : ::
CBuried Hdric(3.OAcres) ®B815" 01323-24" 1110 ►�� ,p •I • •
x ; :::
HHydric(1 .7Acres) .UNot H di (1.7Acres) •
•
•
•
•
- ® - " . . ., . , •
•
H2-Shallow Hydric(1.5 Acres) - ;', : :
® Soil Study Borings y 3
}
►.�B33-0" ®B53-6"
'• ®B32-0" ►:�B34-4" ®B41-6" ®B42-20" ®B52-2" \ �,
®B54 4" :*
®B43-0" ®B51-2"
•
•
®B35-4" ®B40-0" ®B44-8" ®B55-0" ®B62-18"
i ®B49-4" ®B56-10" '.� ti
®B36 0" ®B39 4" ®B45 6" 5
•
®B61 16" ®B65-12"::: J
®B48-18" f
®B37-O®B38-0" ®B57-18" 4
®B46-10"
®B47-8" ®B60-22" ®B66-14"
® II
B73-6" ®B58-18" •• -
®B72-22"
n ®B5918" ®B67-21" '`4' .3
®B7122" ®B70-15"
X
y ®B69-1„ ®B68 30" 1
a s, II
I.
f
PP xx WYANT CREEK REACH 4 ••
•
• ®B75 0" O B76-0" a..
"
.. I . . . • ®B85-0" I, :
. . • •• �i
• • ,• - . . . . . .. • ......., ,• .,111%._?ar.. ..,;,• ..Z %•r r....._, •v .. i_ 1 • ;
" .. _ ®B82-0" ( . . \ ilia"
. _ .4k.% ;,.:\::;•::. • • • . ,....
•
•
It ..), ,::;
- " • 11::,7 . .:, . 41F' 9:: ' • • " '-.' AIP .• -IC'.
.. . .4,.- :
.e :: :,, 1 „,
., ..•,.
.,., , i r. • . .. ._ _, ... _.____
% .. , . 01.00.4,k ®B80 0"+ AL.aliiiii .„.,. J .. ' '. •,.:\ • 015 Aerial Imagery
Soils Study Exhibit
bPkiloiNe W I L D L 11 N D S 0 50 100 200 300 400 Feet
Wyant Lands Mitigation Site
ENGINEERING Catawba River Basin (03050102)
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Cat 03 Extended Service Area-Warm NonTLW
N Lincoln County, NC

r.'"
; ,,,:; Typical Crowned (C) Area Typical Hydric Soil (H) Area
Typical Upland Area

APPENDIX 8A
Amendment Preliminary Design Plans

of V 1
z Want Lands Mitigation Site
Y ,, , ,,
z����mo
Addendum
t)Ili%P
Q6ms-xI
Lincoln County, North Carolina �w 1LLLL
for
NCDEQ
Division of Mitigation Services ti,-,o� $
Sheet Index
Title Sheet 0.1 c_p
Project Overview 0.2
N
x
\ General Notes and Symbols 0.3
A
�'ee` Typical Sections 0.4
��o
as UT2 Reach 1 Plan and Profile 1.0
a 2
AMENDMENT AREAS Wetland Grading 2.0 2.2
ma
k „,,,,.. .,,,,
,ac�o -,� Erosion and Sediment Control 3.0-3.1 0O
f 1` Planting Plan 4.0-4.2 U
•. ,
cn
Details 5.1 -5.9 O a
;: " °
Hi
O
m
'to, .o r ,
' rt O
O i V
3
O ,-I
r
Vicinity Map
Not to Scale
3
Project Directory
PRELIMINARY PLANS Engineering: Owner:
BEFORE YOU DIG! Wildlands Engineering,Inc NCDEQ
CALL NE-CALL CENTER
ISSU ED October 11, 2021 License No.F-0831 Division of Mitigation Services
N.C.ONE-CALL CENTER
IT'S THE LAW! 167-B Haywood Road 1652 Mail Service Center
Asheville,NC 28806 Raleigh,NC 27699-1652
I Eric Neuhaus,PE Paul Wiesner =
828-774-5547 828-273-1673
3 Surveying: ,E
E, Kee Mapping and Surveying,PA
111 Central Avenue
Asheville,NC 28801 USACE Action ID No.SAW-2017-02609
Brad Kee,PLS NCDWR No.20180177 E
x 828-575-9021 0 , d o
/� /

o`l V 1
E
Z
JERRY THOMAS WYANT / Z
to)Q'''1'
1w
om z°,PIN:3605-98-8648
D6:755 PG 535 _�\ Qom
I- Z�QILLE
� H w s
7
V PIN:3 F.R-38-16 7
PIN:3615-38-1627
WYANT LANDS,LLC DB:2291 PG:60&
MATTHEW W.RAZAI PIN:3605-97-0726 PIN:N:3615-5-17-3-3928 DB:2292 P6:584
D6:2500 P6:80 D6:2436 PG:938
DAVID J.WYANT&WIFE ��
;, BRANDI F.WYANT
PIN:3615-07-7619 �0�
DB:2586 PG:738 sHeeT2.o - �ti ��ct��
\ PB:16 PG:350 _ _ _ - - - - - v Q� �� ���
i
i / ADDENDUM WETLAND (P
\ \
3J 3J MITIGATION AREA
V 1\ H
��o �°\ �'� A
1\ \
? � � � dJ
t \
1
-o -}o I I
\...), WYANT LANDS,LLC �iliROBERT THOMAS WYANTPIN:3615-07-4254
PIN:3605-87-3054 I �O DB:2436 PG:926
\ DB:1933 PG:169 _ .9
\Q I
''`'o WYANT LANDS,LLC I ��o7.,
PIN:3605-76-0937 I .\
DB:2436 PG:929
�yO ✓`�,_ \\ PREVIOUSLY CONSTRUCTED
yO I �-.,•`^� I I \ \ PROJECT AREAS CATAWBA LANDS CONSERVANCY •75 E
V O� PIN:3615-25-6566 .--a
\ I \J wo �� I DB:1721 PG:343 0
�yO uT,. - - / - _ _ PB:13 PG:271 cn ( N
l
�y V - ROB IN:360 THOMAS WY,WNT - - U •�
° PIN:3605-96-484
_ DB: PG: - - �
�17
� q
\ ' �- ''m �//�7 N / V
ROBIN:360 MAS WYANT 1 x x / \ •2
'yo PIN:3605-96-4840 " / LANDST
D6:2000 PG:406WYANT 7D CREEK -•WYANTPIN:3605-76-0937DB:2436PG:929WYANT LANDS,LLC \ +'
aili
PIN:3605-65-7869 \ WYANT LANDS,LLC \ PIN:3605-95-9148 \ tt
DB:2702 PG:691 VD6:2339 PG:182
PIN:3605-95-9148 — TRACT 1)PG:182 .0 ( 3Ho
'\ \ '''5,0 ��o (TRACT 1) j/
i
„------------- \ 't \ \
x \ �� JERRY THOMAS WYANT \
/� &WIFE LINDA WYANT
�� I� -ii� PIN:3605-95-9968
��� DB:585 PG:191 \
ONE
WYANT LANDS,LLC S _J ( 1 oNE —
PIN:3605-95-9148 r_ \ /
DB:2339 PG:182 L� \ N
(TRACT1) r' A__ 1 I
C _
_ RUTHERFORD ELECTRIC
MEMBERSHIP COOPERATION
PIN:3605-85-7130
DB:711 PG:666
PB:F PG:268&269 N w X Q
ADDENDUM STREAM
RESTORATION AREA V
0' 200' 400' 800' CD
(HORIZONTAL( -
E
3
X o 4 d o

AP- V
E
z to
i_ z
tilwv�il
w I
z�
z
�w LL
Goo
Existing Features Proposed Features Proposed Structures Erosion Control Features
10+00
Existing Thalweg — —I— Proposed Thalweg Alignment Proposed Constructed Riffles Per Plans
See Detail 1-3.Sheet 5.1 [.i [.i Proposed Silt Fence
•••• •• Proposed Bankfull x x i / See Detail Existing Adjoiner Line P
—CE CE CE Proposed Conservation Easement ;���`I�"WSW LOD LOD Proposed LODca
?-�
Existing Property LineP �j�'V. Proposed Brush Toe
*$ II��I
------100 CE-IX CE-IX Proposed Internal Crossing ✓!&' See Detail2,Sheet 5.3
Existing Major ContourP �„•� (I)Proposed Straw Wattle ' rt 0
•
Existing Minor Contour • Proposed Major Contour .—.—.—.— Proposed SPSC See Detail 3 Sheet 5.2 r ,
CE CE CE Proposed Minor Contour ,—,—,—,— See Detail1,Sheet5.6 V E
Recorded Conservation Easement P '"�
Proposed Haul Road Cn + Cf)
OHE Existing Overhead Utility Easement ioD—Lon Proposed Limits of Disturbance Proposed Wetland Ditch Plug I { L ,�y Q 'd
See Detail 4,Sheet 5.5 _ 0 Z
P
ow ow ow Existing Overhead Electric TCE TCE TCE Proposed Temporary Construction Eeasement y
rop Temporary
Existing Power Pole o o Proposed Fencing See Detailosed 4,Sheet 5.4Rock Sediment Dam .' �
Proposed Log Sill O
n �i
x x Existing Fence See Detail 4,Sheet 5.1 •,—i ,� /-�
/ Proposed Temporary Stream Crossing O ''
Existing Storm Pipe O(-� Proposed Rock Sill Timber Mat r ,
See Detail 1,Sheet 5.2 �� See Detail 1,Sheet 5.9 V
Existing Farm Road
Wetland Rehabilitation ft 0
N., W Existing Wetland NZ � > Proposed Construction Entrance
,I' q' q' See Detail 1,Sheet 5.9
0 0 0 Wetland Reestablishment ft
® � Existing Tree
•' � Proposed Silt Fence Gravel Outlet
��
4 See Detail 3,Sheet 5.9
Existing Spring Head Wetland Creation
Existing Bedrock
Existing Asphalt Road
Existing Debris To Be Removed From Conservation Easement
Existing Riprap
Existing Farm Pond
4'
PROJECT NOTES:
1. Topographic data provided by North Carolina Spatial Data Download.
QL1 Lidar data from September 2016. 5 cx.
2. Lidar data supplemented by topographic survey provided by Kee w.,
E' Mapping and Surveying dated March 2019 and August 2021.
3. Riffle selection may vary based on available materials at the
Engineers'discretion.Field coordination will be required. O
4. All existing fencing and debris are to be removed from the proposed
conservation easement. -
E
3
x o o- d o -,

of V 1
E
z U7
Q
t . w v�mLL
aw �z�mz
o�
Q zm=��v
a= QLLE
�w LL
2.3' -- 4.8' -- 2.3
TIE TO EXISTING TIE TO EXISTING ��
GROUND PER PLANS GROUND PER PLANS GO
0 9, PROPOSED BANKFULL
.g 1 1.0'
25:1
R\\\ PROPOSED GRADE
PROPOSED CENTERLINE
g
UT2 Reach 1 -Riffle
STA: 0+00-4+06
•,
O
cn U - o
o
t
o( ,—I
t 7 N ct
H -
- 12.0' _
H
cn o
U
5.6' -- 3.6' -- 2.8' -
T TIE TO EXISTING
TIE TO EXISTING
GROUND PER PLANS GROUND PER PLANS
PROPOSED BANKFULL �y
4'1 1 4 VARIES T. PROPOSED GRADE
1.4'-2.1'
•l\
4-7If.\ A
_ -- 0.7' 2.2' 0.7' f
PROPOSED CENTERLINE
UT2 Reach 1 -Meander Pool
STA: 0+00-4+06
NW
CD
E
3
X o -4 d o
^

r V
E0' 2' 4' 6'
835 (VERTICAL) V1
STA=0+15 Q CI
STA=0+00 ELEV= 830.79
STA 0' 20' 40' 60' 'Zi�ocmo
-ELEV= 831.00 dim °oromz°
ELEV= 830.53 .411- 1''
zrySTA=0+53 STA=1+28oSTA=0+33ELEV= 829.92-ELEV= 828.73 STA=1+97 vELEV= 830.53 NQ_x,- vL... i STA=0+77ELEV= 827.080 m s.. .
..... ELEV= 829.75 STA=/r+73 EXISTING GRADE• w Q LL E
\ I r-----= ELEV= 28 0 �"
1 /� STA=t+02_
\ / '3.5�� _ LEV,/828.98 STA=2+53
STA=1-F52 ELEV= 826.15
830 \\,, li 1� \�\ r 7 ELEV= 828.10 STA=2+19 STA=2+94
�.
�/ 3.1% ••'1�•• / ELE1= 827.08 ELEV= 825.3$
.... \ I STA=3+42
Z 1 00 `'STA 8 2 74
.15 , ELEV= 824.49
LSTA=0+31 ELEV= 826.15 STA=4+20 L
ELEV= 829.66 ,_STA=0+73 - STA=3+15 STA=3+87 ELEV= 823.05
ELEV= 829.05 4.3 0 , ELEV= 825.27 ELEV= 823.68 STA=4+01 ���
ELEVTA80�+505 i i•, �_ �SL STA=3+64 ELEV= 823.68 �Q4.,�Q÷
STA=1+OS _STA=1+25 F _� ELEV= 824.49 44 �Q '�,�G
_STA=0+24 ELEV= 828.00 -0.0/�
ELEV= 828.00 / ••
ELEV= 829.66 - /_
STA=1+69 i 3'?0 •''I �..,• f l 01�
STA=0+14 STA=1+55 - \
ELEV= 830.09 ELEV= 827.11 STA=2+16 I I I •"I-•.. 1 ^\ /\ GQ
ELEV= 827.11 ELEV= 826.34 1 I .y, / I •• \ /
825 1 I I STA=2+00 /
STA=0+02 STA=2+68 \I I I I �"/'
ELEV= 830.09 ELEV= 826.34 STA=2+55 - Soo \/ _
ELEV= 825.43 ELEV= 825.43 1_/ 3. \ '
STA=2+98 _STA=3+11 ,I 3.3%
ELEV= 824.45 ELEV= 824.45 _STA=3+58
STA=3+45 ELEV= 823.66 I
ELEV= 823.66 I
PROPOSED GRADE STA=3 89 _STA=3+98
ELEV= 822.77 ELEV= 8n.;
820 1 J
0+00 0+50 1+00 1+50 2+00 2+50 3+00 3+50 4+00 4+e �,•I
a)
__
X _ax �
I
-
zHi
: _ -
f -- --- --- - -
. "II(" '"" EXISTING - -- '-- ---- - �---, __ !� O +�
r"-
• � "__ --- --= - ----' --_-_- --
�'° _VEGETATION PLO
1-
i ( ,INV IN:845.65' i - /STA:0+24 START UT2 REACH 1-RESTORATION =-_____ _--"--_ -_------ -_-- ________________________ ________ __
;INV OUT:833.5' irr56'/'' - i` '"- -- - ---- --- Ct
-
_" '-----
,<�/O�%� 4„..:.
�,�ae'r,A \�.;_% _T� -- .,this _-
•
;:.`...Q ��% �� �l O l•cw „ l i'• •
w. -#4 ?A. o ff,p_ _8 -
- Sir ',0,, A�b�.00. �„� i U •��,1' �LG f\•`.� �� ijy0- v i(s 0. =i9"� `-`"'�c Imo?. n A` -
i
!C• A % - l ay." -'/„
`, `, `, �� `., --_ '-_ �, _ ----- -- -_ •• _ _- - -_ _ STA:4+20 END UT2 REACH 1
` '-max_- _APPLY PIPE OUTLET _ �X` 4'_; - - RESTORATION
' ---_ X _____-------- a, ----- ------ ---s� DETAIL ON SHEET 5.4. =` __ _
STORATIO
- '---- - __-- ---- ----- - --- - --- --_' -- - -
I,
tiP
- ---- -----
X
TF-
x
7� _
tir
k- -------------n-''--- REMOVE EXISTING FENCE IN-- SHEET - .- .,,_ ______ --------_ -------"--- - ------_ ------ __----- -- ----------"---' -' SEEBMPDETAILON EET56 � ';"�
THE CONSERVATION EASEMENT
i X
�X
cP f !
X E
° - - �X�EE,�� ------__ '" __- _ _----___ `?y1 V i• _ _CEO --- ---- ------- _ .REMOVE EXISTING FENCE IN _ cz.c'T. cz.
_
X
,
,
- ��,`"i ;Iyi ------ THE CONSERVATION EASEMENT
---- ----y-____
-------- ----
x CE
CE
_ -)(
'
--- - - ---
i/
r
_- X' m
�X X- _X �.,

I
V 1
N Q
�w','',''8,`,',:
a�
0
Z=v
,isiot
I- L�"e
,
,,
,-;_,) ,-,,s-,,,,,, ‘,,\-- --)-„,,----,,-,---,____ _---_-,D it c,s=,,___,_ 7, --,i,--.7, .„,_,,,::fr;_.,_:,,,:,7-.;_z,",,5,-,,,,: :://,;_, ,, / , ; /_,-
s :_. , f
, ,-- 0 4o so 1zo
% `,'�',,
ti
- 76 WETLAND CROSS-SECTION 1
,
9+00 - 10+00 - j�, A
., --' )7+00 - __ ,.�zl .J�i
4+005+00 „ _ - - G
-
o�3
00
- ..� w w - �yr
2 00,
- _ F
0
00
100 �
�0 I
i
rY 1
7�i -"IIi4
,
. .raver 47 �av-: ..`�� `Tr ,e
s
Z � 'NI
sue♦ ��®��������ees����������oses®eo�s�a�s� �s�$cANNos®WV*s:•�e���aa_ .� �o.
�����.�.. o saw♦ o «►♦ w '�^
�.. ---------____ _.-_ _ �����i�A�F. ve-44. � A�������AOO� ♦ 4 ...aka, ,
4j t►�s�J .�.sas.a ll►. pa� )1�r'ai�`A���`
�b
e
. f� ♦ ♦ ® ♦�� ♦♦ ♦♦ ������ ♦ ®®-4•Q♦ ♦ ♦ `
i������� ♦���i ® 4, ,,,,,,
/, /, /, /, ♦ i sus ♦ �►,
i • j
1+ '�k
0, � tP
�i,, -7+- '- 7- 3+00 / WETLAND CROSS-SECTION 2 � ,,,
o0 �1"
'� i i 4 i _ eo -;
� -- - —+ ,,- 00
I _ - " - - DITCH PLUG,TYP. - ''y
�1•
� i i',,, /� 2+00, / I 1h� �����������9>�_ WETLAND CROSSSECTION3 �����������ii bD•\'\,.1-(4:404.4:41:14: 44,7-:
_ =�' ?=f, , _ -4+00 �/ 5+00 a,���.�o��AAO ����A�����������. i :::/11:_,1:1,
's -/. `v' g
+00
® — 10+00 - _k=' , �..+ CD
`` 11+00 �,
� � • _ — -� 2+00
u A-
______ . // /
. r - --- / , , '
1�®1* * i �••�tee?'les�*' - - - -01 .40®i
I.
' 1 4. i *� _ ® � A � 4a4d�4.4�4�4�44 4A4 44 �
(ICI,a& B.*41> �¢6i4**4-4me5eos-42 -4-4k4bi.....l�Ate.4004 4 i. ® 4/
T1/ ',%„i CE C CSC CSC -4,� A '� _
, 77/ :, /
______- 44 „-"'-----' 4/7/7 '---___„,
, ,„ ,,,,, 'ci.
1 ioo z+oo ��� a+ WETLAND CROSS-SECTION 4 ,,,
,/:
I,, i - �� - - 4+00 5+00 +
I, . i i , i ,6 00 7+00� 0
I ii " / /
/ `X/ / / /
/. ✓ Y< /. 1. f. /. /. /. /. f / /. /. `.,
a I /�� CE `----CE—fCV, CEO ZCE �E CE CE CE CE CE—CE—CE—CE CE—CE—CE—CE-- -CE - C€-_- CE CE- CE �CE— CE��
- .. J m\„
I I I f�� 1 \ `l
'C
I II I I
1, d rallyy i % m \� Z x
5' W W
fq II CY �/ 1 ti W
5 O
•
Li ,
I�� m N
w' I
1 4hi

V 1
!C
cn
i
N
785
\
785 \
4011 511!Pa;
\\\\\\
1\1
i - 780
\---
1 I
1
N [*\
11„.............„........ \
\
•,.
-
0' 40' 80' 120'
,
'-.--,_x',,.,._..„...... PROPOSED GRADE I
---
..--
775
V
-\-- EXISTING GRADE \ 1
770 770
C
0÷
765 765
2+00 2+50 3+00 3+50 4+00 4+50 5+00 5+50 6+00 6+50 7+00 7+50 8+00 8+50 9+00 9+50 10+00
WETLAND CROSS-SECTION 1
‘.-------- 44
J_ ---,\,„ '‘ \ 1-s-, '-','-,•,:),_--‘?___)-AL-4-iiikil-6!---1-i"-.":;,==-... . '-i-- '--:-::--"--C-: -":::7=-------=L- - - -.'t ' ---: / 2-\\ ', \ ''S'----- ,!--''''----'-', 1:,`It.-,• )
-,_:-----------------------------------------------------------------------------",7-7.:.'L_.f-ili'";--1-%i'21.4W-4:2; _:------------------------------------------------- _
,,,,- T,:----t=_T --`) 0 ,,,,....4' ",,,''-;., ."? `"---•,‘`; :,;r‘-:;-'‘ a)
,---, 1 - .,.--7).,_,-:,/,_-_;.-- -5,_---,-,--=;--,72-1s,),,,2::::=;- = .,-- / , -- I/ , / , _,---"1 ,--- '--=-L'::-----1----7:-- ------ _____ -- ------ -,„ '•„_A------ „------___ \,`24,)‘1\s'`i\\ ; ;''''' •
` ••;<-;,-;,,,-:0:2\ 't
, / i ; i / / / -- __,\__31(•,,:; : 1 ' \\ \ ' ,
'----__ N„ __------
_.,- ----
, -1,t;t,',,,:,,' '< •El
';--7s .-sc\ ..•\Ys•\ \ '?
c—i
V' '',.., '',.., ,---'..-. ',,Y 1‘;‘-• ')\:\\.-:-!:,'1 '\ (1) 0
„
\ V,, '...'.i, r''''-',„-,' c-•11)1V;-'ik's,'''' -I-) ;..1 tcr)
•,-1
• - - 't`,Y4-,,---.:`.\\1''• S'-- '''''').''`. -- j 's.L "L'i'S3 I'lqiI 2 C.f) rt .5
777
, c
c, U 7i
..../
, tt
Z.,
0 ,• ;—'
/ A
' t,,•,•'s,i
•, (2
I •1/ •1, ''';'4:?{) 10+00
gel WETLAND CROSS-SECTION 1
9+00
czt 0 '-ci
, ) I ,--•.?--__)7+00; 2.`‘,-A,„\ ., •• == - r''' -- - ----7.'p, •;f:c.---' ''', •,-I-C) X c''
6+00
:V;',‘,st \• \ --..' 1 - ..--, mc, '',,,.Z,‘,1 ' ..',. .e ''';
_.----- ,)1- %•-, '. %.\ A \ 4 -•r--1 ') ''',- '''' ', •,--i ,4, (i-'
-----------+Z--- ' -1, 71- _, i ..,- 's ' ‘, ,,3\ \\ \ -(,:-',--;-:'•-- ' --,!' . ''r';, ,„,_„„ :__, ,,
.\‘6\ \\ \
\
,i,., ,,, .1_, j . \ . • . \ -,.; r!,z'.„,-- ,:•?a,,,M• \ os '‘, `-,..-.2,--: 0
_....----- . -----,53.0.-. ..1 -1- i- ,--,..33--._. _.=_ 3 ."---'43 ' • P- ',':77.... ..avk.k \\ ' . '-': C.1)
--r--:-----------
•,-I..,
Ct 1--1
-- '--------:-'1‘-:"-------------;;--------;z---1--- 71:7;::"17:-•T'1":;1 :: 91‘'io\,,:s \ ‘‘ , i'0+;1T: :1-1 ,I i'll 00(
-1-)
-__
.,,
Ct
1
'' \ .°`, ,, \\\ '11.,,s
..-..,
: / "2) 1
' -f =" 3+00 4
-' ,'-- ,— ''-f ' 1 6+00 8+00
4+00 ' .:-- .1' WETLAND SECTION.1'2 7+00 ------ ‘
, ------ tk 's':'' •\ \ 1,-=C,
-1-4=.--4 - I
_,-,
c
\ - 1;1 1 '.; --4, ,A,__.,_ _•,__ ,..-,_ -I
I
__.-----
\ii fi.. ...-,
mIllk _. 1 •
•
''.11.„
s..,_, 's, ‘,,c), L DITCH PLUG,TYP.
MATCHLINE
- -- 14esi'`'ilz,
1 / '‘,
1-' . ' ''. -'":,`‘‘,\>\ n
780---
_,,...--------...; „,
,---, •.' . 7*•;•;,8, \‘1‘',, ‘,, \:V''':
_ -------------775---- ,
1 \
\
780 \
\ 0 40' 80' 120'
‘...
I \
__...
I ,
'-'• /—EXISTING GRADE I
I PROPOSED GRADE f I 0' 5' 10' 15'
775
------ _---
i 775
\ c''
770 770
Ea
g
•
N,-f
765 765
2+00 2+50 3+00 3+50 4+00 4+50 5+00 5+50 6+00 6+50 7+00 7+50 8+00 8+50 9+00 9+50 10+00 10+50 11+00
.c, . ''•'; ,-; ]
WETLAND CROSS-SECTION 2
..1 .. -,
‘....

-V �
~ N —
ns 9
'
���
nm ^. EXISTING GRADE
v ^v *, ox
' ~~�~
775 ---'----_ --_-
--------__________________--- _____ — — ~— v r `v `r
-PROPOSEDnRAo
ov
770
na
2+00 2+50 3+00 3+50 4+00 4+50 5+00 5+50 6+00 6+50 7+00 7+50 8+00 8+50 9+00 9+50 10+00 10+50
WETLAND CROSS-SECTION 3
MATCHLINE
-------------------------
WETLAND CROSS-SECTION 3
2+00
8+00
REMOVE EXISTING FENCE IN
CONSERVATION EASEMENT
--------------
ul
3+00
11+00
------------
nm
EXISTING GRADE
----- --
r� ____---- -------�--- --
--_____ _' ___ ----- --------_ �________— ----- ~~~ v °, ", ��
--------- �
\ ~~�~ �
�-,nn,nssonn*os "' r m' �' -
rm �et �
ro, �
znn z ,n , nn , ,n � nn � ,n � nn � ,n , nn , ,n onn o ,n rnn r ,n onn o ,n snn s ,n znnn
� ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
� WETLAND CROSS-SECTION 4

V V 1
RIPARIAN ZONE + + + + + + +
z / WETLAND PLANTING ZONE V1 m
Species Common Name Spacing Min. Percentage + + + + + +
Caliper + + + + + + + Species Common Name Spacing Min. Percentage Q
- + + + + + + Caliper 'Z 0 m o
Alnus serrulata Tag Alder 12ft x 6ft 0.25" 5% + + + + + + + Platanus occidentalis Sycamore 12ft x 12ft 0.25" 15% z N°'"'
$ o m z°
Carpinus caroliniana American Hornbeam 12ft x 6ft 0.25" 10% - + + + + + + 01'''''''
ry m v
Quercus phellos Willow Oak 12ft x 12ft 0.25" 15% �,o
Liriodendron tulipifera Tulip Poplar 12ft x 6ft 0.25" 5% + + + + + + + z i 2^V
Betula nigra River Birch 12ft x 12ft 0.25" 15% Q 0 m v....
Platanus occidentalis Sycamore 12ft x 6ft 0.25" 20% a z s F LL E
Quercus michauxii Swamp Chestnut Oak 12ft x 12ft 0.25" 15%
Betula nigra River Birch 12ft x 6ft 0.25" 15% w
sambucus canadensis Elderberry 12ft x 12ft 0.25" 10%
Populus deltoides Eastern Cottonwood 12ft x 6ft 0.25" 10% Alnus serrulata Tag Alder 12ft x 12ft 0.25" 10%
Diospyros virginiana Persimmon 12ft x 6ft 0.25" 10%
Cephalanthus Common Buttonbush 12ft x 12ft 0.25" 10%
Quercus nigra Water Oak 12ft x 6ft 0.25" 5% occidentalis
Quercus phellos Willow Oak 12ft x 6ft 0.25" 10% Rosa palustris Swamp rose 12ft x 12ft 0.25" 10%
Quercus michauxii Swamp Chestnut Oak 12ft x 6ft 0.25" 10%
Permanent Riparian Seeding O'S�. �÷
Pure Live Seed(22Ibs/acre mix) � 0+4)
Stabilization Seeding Approved Species Name Common Name Stratum Density Q4 �� . '"
Scientific Name Common Name lb/acre Date (lbs/acre)Festuca arundinacea Tall Fescue 80 All Year Schizachyrium Little Bluestem Herb 4.0 Go÷�
NOTE: scoparium
1. "STABLIZATION SEEDING"IS FOR AREAS OF All Year Rudbeckia hirta Blackeyed Herb 1.0
DISTURBANCE OUTSIDE CONSERVATION EASEMENT. Susan
All Year Carex vulpinoidea Fox Sedge Herb 1.0
All Year Panicum clandestinum Deertongue Herb 3.0
All Year Elymus virginicus Virginia Wild Herb 3.0
Rye
All Year Sorghastrum nutans Indiangrass Herb 3.0
All Year Coreopsis lanceolata Lanceleaf Herb 1.0
coreopsis
All Year Bidens aristosa Bur-marigold Herb 1.0 "i
All Year Panicum rigidulum Redtop Herb 1.0
See Detail 3,Sheet 5.3 for Panicgrass ,..i
STREAM BANK PLANTING ZONE-Live Stakes
Live Staking instructions on streambanks. All Year Helianthus Narrowleaf Herb 1.0 7i p
Species Common Name Indio. Min. Percentage angustifolia sunflower
Spacing Caliper •.-i
All Year Coreopsis tinctoria Plains coreopsis Herb 1.0 .--i
Cephalanthus Common Buttonbush 3-5 ft 0.5" 20%
occidentalis All Year Panicum virgatum Switchgrass Herb 2.0 s�
salixsericea Silky Willow 3-5 ft 0.5" 40% NOTE: r�
Physocarpus opulifolius Ninebark 3-5 ft 0.5" 20% 1. PERMANENT RIPARIAN SEEDING IN ALL DISTURBED AREAS WITHIN V a
CONSERVATION EASEMENT O .-
sambucus canadensis Elderberry 3-5 ft 0.5" 20% •...i, +' pO pp
TEMPORARY SEEDING bt Oj +'
STREAM BANK ZONE-Herbaceous Plugs PLANTING RATE -k '—' Ct ct
Species Common Name Indiv. Percentage APPROVED DATE TYPE (lbs/acre)
Spacing Rye Grain(Secale Cereale) 120 '~
Juncos effusus Common Rush 4 ft 40% Ground Agricultural .� U Carex alata Broadwing Sedge 4 ft 20% Jan 1—May 1 Limestone 2,000
•ti
Carex lurida Lurid Sedge 4 ft 15% 10-10-10 Fertilizer 750 (1 1—J
Scirpus cyperinus Woolgrass 4 ft 15% Straw Mulch 4,000 I—J
Carex crinita Fringed Sedge 4 ft 10% German Millet(Setaria italics) 40
NOTE: Ground Agricultural 2,000 tt
1. TOP SOIL TO BE STOCK PILED AND May 1—Aug 15 Limestone
REAPPLIED TO ALL AREAS. 10-10-10 Fertilizer 750
2. SOIL TEST MAY BE REQUIRED TO Straw Mulch 4,000
DETERMINE FERTILIZER APPLICATION RATE
IF INADEQUATE GROWTH IS VISIBLE. Rye Grain e Cereale) 120
3. LIVE STAKES ARE TO BE INSTALLED IN A Ground Agricultricultural 2,000
SINGLE ROW.SPACING SHALL BE 5 FEET IN Aug 15—Dec 31 Limestone
TANGENT SECTIONS(BOTH BANKS)AND 3 10-10-10 Fertilizer 1,000
FEET IN BENDS(OUTSIDE BANK ONLY).
Straw Mulch 4,000
ct
rl
N w w
O
E
311
x� „ , d o

✓ V
E
N Q
i 401.M
taYi W
iz�mz
_ _ ______ _ - - - - - - -gifeidle 0 ______ _ _____ _ _ - _ -
v o�
qzm>��v
= QLL[ 1--1 w'-' LL
-X-
0' 40' 80' 120'
,1Z.r'S'
,i, ,i, ,i, ,i, \ .\
. I c
o�
./--- -F. + + + + + W+ + -F. + + + + W+ W+ -F. + 'f i + W+
+• '- '1'+ '1'+ 'W- lk +1' +'1' +'1' + '1'+ '1'+ '1'+ - + + + '1' '1'+ '1'\
+ t + \
+ + + + + + `1'+ '1'+ + * +`1' +`1' + `1' + `1'+ `1'+ 'F' 44' + + + `1' +
�/ + + + + + + + + 'v+ v.♦- ' +I' + vb + + + + w-
/ + + + + + + + + + * + + + + + + + + + + + + v+
} + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + ,+
}/ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + W
/ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
} + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + • 'i
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + '1' ',
'; / + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + ,1
/ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + �' +'v +'v `v + --I
} +'1, +'1, +'v + 'v + '1'+ '+ 4- +v +'1, +'1, + 'v + 'v+ '1'+ N+ t +`1, w 'v '1'+ + +
/ + + + + + + r I t +�, +�, +�, + �, + �,+ �,+ ,+ t +�, +, + �, + + + + + + + + + + U y rt
, + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +J•
/b v v v v v v v v v v v v a
+ + + + + + + + + + I + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
' .� + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + '+ +' -1' +' I+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + O to
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +' + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
-i-/ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + H ,_,I
II/41/ / 4 + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + i
/$ +`v + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + O
+�, +�, +' + ', '0 - �, + + + + + + + + + + + + + ,,,+ �,+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + 0
+ + + + + + + + + + �I + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
Ti
rt
/' ' ' + • + + +J + J' + + -+ -+ + T + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + , 1^
, // r CE + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
1 x i '1+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
I W n + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
I 1 + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
ql I I + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + '
n+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
I I + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
n + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
i
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
4 I I CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE
ct X
yl
I m
4i
X
1 I U
1 1 zo I m
/ X
o I U
I m
I
X c
a
c i I
U
X I m N W
I W
U
1-1
Im
W `a 70
0 E

or V 1
E
0' 20' 40' 60' 4 a 1 w m o
o
aW �z� z
thiq
�w LL
ti �oo��o�
X �X God
I _��
h______—X--------
I
x
/
x xx x_x_x_
/
EXISTIN
/
VEGETATION PLOT
x
ii
x7i C/0001:4 ) p
x . o O •2 Al'ill II II III I 4xo
A,
x a._
4w., 1 �' 6 H
I cl
x
t�X _
_ X�
X X X-X-X�X�X�X- X X j�X X-X
._ __-.
__
--x_______x
/ / ,
_____ X X X X X X X X X X /X X X X } I
a
/ 7 i
,,
1
1
1
,,
1 zxz
N w^
N
E
3
x� .. d o

�� SEE PROFILE V
FOR LENGTH OF RIFFLE - SALVAGED ONSITE
-5HEAD OF RIFFLE ELEVATION COBBLE/GRAVEL BED MATERIAL HEAD OF RIFFLE ELEVATION
B POINT PER PROFILE POINT PER PROFILE A
SEE DETAIL 4,SHEET 7.3 FOR
RIFFLE MATERIAL SIZING 3/ Q N
V V THALWEG O) 55°TO 65° z c7 � m o
NORMAL WATER �/ z
TOP OF BANK BURY INTO BANK 3'MIN.(TYP) (TYP)
SURFACE �.,ea ' ozNmz
FLOW 0.5'MAX. 1110a w
HEAD OF RIFFLE I,-. BANKFULL v�;o
TAIL OF RIFFLE ELEVATION ., 1 `•A � 6 ,�v
� -U -U -U -U -U -UU -U -C POINT PER PROFILE - !��.�= Q m v x
HEAD OF RIFFLE ELEVATIONI, \ � 12"DIAMETER OR w N a 12 LL
POINT PER PROFILE �� GREATER(TYP) H LL
A A' RIFFLE BOTTOM \ - INSTALL BRUSH TOE OR I.I \ir
WIDTH PER STONE BANK PROTECTION i
l TYPICAL SECTIONS
FLOW
/ 5'MIN. NONWOVEN .N' •
, ,,, ,,, ,,, ,,, ,,, ,,, ,,, ,,, ,DIY-Y ! (TYP) TER FABRIC - �0,.0,
TOE OF SLOPE(TYP) �,: ' r A
Profile View �riP BED MATERIAL
TAIL OF RIFFLE ELEVATION SALVAGED ONSITE 1•` ,�•�
POINT PER PROFILE A-A' COBBLE/GRAVEL BED MATERIAL ap.%IIII ��
TOP OF BANK(TYP) RIFFLE MATERIAL SIZING SEE DETAIL 2,SHEET 5.2 FOR / IiILI �10�41_ O÷
Plan View _ G
TOP OF BANK TOE OF TAIL OF RIFFLE ELEVATION ��"�II ���
SALVAGED ONSITE SLOPE ���►'�'.,'-
POINT PER PROFILE + GO
COBBLE/GRAVEL BED MATERIAL ���`%,
SEE DETAIL 4,SHEET 7.3 FOR _ _ _ �.��. ��
RIFFLE MATERIAL SIZING - 4�..11�*.
SALVAGED ONSITE j.`. �'
COBBLE/GRAVEL BED MATERIAL .3. + , rearm*rm EXCAVATE LOW FLOW
SEE DETAIL 2,SHEET 5.2 FOR 5'MIN. _ , _ 5'MIN. B ` U^arill THALWEG IN RIFFLE
RIFFLE MATERIAL SIZING (TYP) (TYP) �=
a .'� ..c T'#_ '-A. 0.5'MIN. RIFFLE INVERT PER PROFILE ��.�i�
7 Log Section B-B' •
•
TOP OF BANK(TYP) A'
B
Profile A-A' Section B-B' -t
Plan View
Angled Log Riffle
® -Constructed Riffle ®Not to Scale
Not to Scale lelei lejelel .
NOTE:
1. BOULDER MATERIAL CAN BE O
CR-CR CR-ALR SUBSTITUTED IN PLACE OF ANGLED •r-1-)-I L
LOGS WITH APPROVAL OF ENGINEER. CIS r ,
• V
SEE PROFILE • y
-CLASS 1 STONE
FOR LENGTH OF RIFFLE -I-)
OR SALVAGED PJ} O
ONSITE BOULDERS bA z
MIN 0.5'xVx1.5'
—.-BCR-CH i�
TOP OF BANK(TYP) z
m O
TOE OF SLOPE(TYP) � �y
QUARRIED
HEAD OF RIFFLE TAIL OF RIFFLE BED MATERIAL SILL ELEVATION
ELEVATION POINT PER PROFILE
ELEVATION POINT
PER PROFILE
PER PROFILE y,� EXCAVATED
�� Al M A' STREABED SCOUR POOLft
A FILTER FABRIC ���
TOP OF BANK TYP
SILL ELEVATION WIY• `
PER PROFILE(TYP)
B' TOE OF SLOPE(TYP)
SALVAGED ONSITE
FLOW EXTEND FILTER FABRIC
COBBLE/GRAVEL BED MATERIAL CLASS 1 STONE Plan View ,,,..- 5'MIN.UPSTREAM
SEE DETAIL 2,SHEET 5.2 FOR OR SALVAGED SALVAGED ONSITE
3 RIFFLE MATERIAL SIZING ONSITE BOULDERS COBBLE/GRAVEL BED MATERIAL Profile View
MIN 0.5'x1'x1.5' SEE DETAIL 4,SHEET 7.3 FOR
RIFFLE MATERIAL SIZING
CLASS 1 STONE
OR SALVAGED
RIFFLE INVERT PER PROFILE oa
ONSITE BOULDERS A "dui
3 MAX MIN 0.5'xVx1.5'
1 • ,WA-. VARIES PER TOP OF BANK(TYP) Plan View
BASEFLOW
HEADER LOG
EMBED LOG SILL ELEVATION FOOTER LOG
5'(MIN.) PER PROFILE(TYP)- Section A-A' -
lac
SectionA-A'
Section B-B'
NKII
w
Log Sill •
®Chunky Riffle1-1
L r)
Not to Scale ®Not to Scale • V J
fel-
• 3
ll'x� ..1 .. d o

m
Z LL
W N°Jm
Q O �z °zr�imv
C0 N 12"NOMINAL THICKNESS )aZ r itj3''
a p A OF EQUAL PARTS Q 0 m 5°'r-
p 0 W �� _5 CLASS A,B,AND 1 STONE a w Q F LL E
1'X 1'X 1.5'HEADER
BOULDER MINIMUM.
B B' ..xf
I A' FILTER FABRIC
SILL ELEVATION EXTEND FILTER
PER PROFILE FABRIC 5'MIN. ��
UPSTREAM e
Plan View Profile A-A' � ��-�O-
G0
/TOP OF BANK SILL ELEVATION PER PROFILE
Riffle Materials Table
y��1�Si���'�n { �����n� 1�n' Reach Riffle Riffle Material Stone Size(%of
Thickness(in) Matrix)
UT2 Reach 1 12 Class A(50%),Class B(50%)
EMBED 5'
INTO
Section B-B' BANK(TYP)
®Rock Sill omc) ®Structure Dimensions
rt
Not to Scale Not to Scale 0
r)
1"x1"x24"WOOD STAKE, 0 ,— 4
8-10"DIA.FIBER ROLL y, o 05
OF STRAW&BURLAP bA Z
TWINE MESH
SOIL EXCAVATED IN
TRENCHLINE SHALL BE 6"MIN. 2"FLW :: 10N
I
ECO-STAKE(TYP) TOP OF NK /�\I \ 51
�c y a �
3'MAX.PG6"MIN12
Section View
STAKE(TYP) TOE OF SLOPE
Plan View Eco-Stake
Typical Stake
3
PLACE SOIL EXCAVATED DURING
ia TRENCHING ON UPHILL SIDE OF ROLL
DRIVE STAKES OVERLAP ROLL EDGES 12" EROSION CONTROL
IN ON ALTERNATING AND SECURE TO PROVIDE MATTING(TYP) TOP OF BANK
' SIDES OF ROLL\ A TIGHT JOINT /SECURE MATTING IN
\
J a •• / 6"DEEP TRENCH IF DIRECTED BY THE DESIGNER
6'-0"•99 6'-0„ Jk STAKE(TYP) \ &/,� /�
70 MAX._�MAX.,'+y �' • TOE OF SLOPE \ ti/fi ��"
TYP. 4' y MATTING TO BE BURIED N.
��
- JY4•'•y J J BELOW RIFFLE MATERIAL `�i
a 99 3T� \TAKE(TYP)
�o�
'`� Section View
N w
Li,
NOTES: N
®Straw Wattle 1. FIBER ROLLS MAY PLACED AT LOCATIONS AS In
/
DIRECTED BY THE DESIGNER ®Erosion Control Mattm 2'Not to Scale 2. INSTALL FIBER ROLL ALONG CONTOUR.RUNOFF MUST g
NOT BE ALLOWED TO RUN UNDER OR AROUND ROLL. Not to Scale ; m m
3
x� ..\ d o

MATERIAL SPECIFICATIONS CI)/�
8'MAX.WITH WIRE PHYSICAL PROPERTY TESTS REQUIREMENTS -O �^
�
(6'MAX.WITHOUT WIRE) z z aia
MATERIAL N/A POLYETHYLENE
�� °3zr�imv
RECOMENDED COLOR N/A "INTERNATIONAL ORANGE" a w o
MIDDLE AND VERTICAL WIRES dr z i
i�I
I/SHALL BE 12zGAGE N. QDmsx
/FILTER FABRIC TENSILE YIELD ASTM D638 AVE.2000 LBS.PER 4'WIDE a w N a F LL LL
TOP AND BOTTOM STRAND/ - - ULTIMATE TENSILE STRENGTH ASTM D638 AVE.2900 LBS.PER 4'WIDE
SHALL BE 10 GAUGE MIN. N
ELONGATION AT BREAK(%) ASTM D638 GREATER THAN 1000%
WIRE - CHEMICAL RESISTANCE N/A INERT TO MOST CHEMICALS AND ACIDS
6'MAX.WITH WIRE - ÷o`�.a- �÷
G ATTACH SAFETY FENCE ��ti�0.7V eS
FILTER FABRIC
TO METAL POSTS USING Q 4j' .\
COMPACTED FILL EXISTING GROUND METAL WIRE TIES `.-
()O
ORANGE SAFTY
$ 2STEEL'-0"DEPTH
/FENCEII
2'-0"DEPTH "T"OR"U"POST DRIVEN
--II 4„ MINIMUM OF 18"INTO GROUND
EXTEND FABRIC INTO TRENCH ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ 4'MIN.
NOTES:
1. USE WIRE A MINIMUM OF 32"IN WIDTH AND ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
WITH A MINIMUM OF 6 LINES OF WIRES WITH i\�\/\�\/\�\/\\/\�\/\\/\�\/X. \/\\/i\\/\\/\\/\\/\\/\\/\\/i\\/\�\/\\/\�\/\�\/\\/\�\/\\/. i\\/\�\/\�\/\\/\�%\\//.//.//./ 'd
12"STAY SPACING.
2. USE FILTER FABRIC A MINIMUM OF 36"IN ®Temporary Silt Fence
WIDTH AND FASTEN ADEQUATELY TO THE Not to Scale — — L- rd
WIRES AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER.
3. PROVIDE 5'STEEL POST OF THE SELF-FASTENER 18"MIN. —
ANGLE STEEL TYPE. ®Safety Fence O
4. SEE DETAIL 4,SHEET 7.17 FOR SILT FENCE Not to Scale
GRAVEL OUTLET c.▪nr1
•O
ct O Q
- 3' WIDTH PER TYPICAL SECTIONS
A BACKFILL Cn 0
EROSION CONTROL MATTING � �„
-- I I EROSION CONTROL MATTING i T P OF BANK(BANKFULL) ,�y •,—i
/ \/�\//\\� FILTER FABRIC /\/\/////\/\/\i\i
Q� ELEV.6"ABOVE / /\/\/\\
pQ�PN� RIFFLES INVERT \i` DENSELY PACKED BRUSH,WOODY DEBRIS AND SOIL /�/\\///�%\\//\/ ��
.cOQ ir Ql DENSELY PACKED WOODY DEBRIS %F, \\ . ft
l /////\/j-
pEp / TOE OF SLOPE / \\
-cpE /Ql A' BRUSH MATERIAL TO BE INSTALLED ELEV.6"BELOW J/ NATIVE SOIL
pQgPs FLUSH WITH BANK POOL DEPTH
3
Aa Plan View Section AA'
2-1 NOTES:
1. OVEREXCAVATE 3'OUTSIDE OF TOP OF BANK(BANKFULL).
2. INSTALL A DENSE LAYER OF BRUSH/WOODY DEBRIS,WHICH SHALL
lac CONSIST OF SMALL BRANCHES AND ROOTS COLLECTED ON-SITE AND
i' SOIL TO FILL ANY VOID SPACE. LIGHTLY COMPACT BRUSH/WOODY
Ea DEBRIS LAYER.
3. BRUSH SHOULD BE ALIGNED SO STEMS ARE ROUGHLY PARALLEL AND
IS INSTALLED POINTING SLIGHTLY UPSTREAM. �^o
4. INSTALL FILTER FABRIC OVER BRUSH/WOODY DEBRIS.
®Brush Toe-UT2 5. INSTALL EARTH BACKFILL OVER BRUSH/WOODY LAYER ACCORDING
Not to Scale TO TYPICAL SECTION DIMENSIONS.
6. SEED,MULCH AND INSTALL EROSION CONTROL MATTING AND BANK
STABILIZATION PER PLANS. E
3

p� HIGH STRENGTH V
DOUBLE STITCHED
"1"TYPE SEAMS.
4"INTAKE HOSE
IMPERVIOUS DIKE ( V1
SEE INSET"B' �1 PUMP BAG PLACED ON AGGREGATED OR STRAW DEWATERING BAG PLACED
( ) OUTSIDE OF RECEIVING CHANNEL\ EXISTING TERRAIN DEWATERING
OF RECEIVING CHANNEL Q -o m
\ SEWN IN SPOUT !/ 'Z c7 c q H m o
HIGH STRENGTH STRAPPING . t ) TOP OF BANK di $u `"z0
10' DEWATERING LOHOLDINGHOSESTREAM BED ��a w li m v"oIBAGACE. Q? cv�IlL
__� 4"DISCHARGE HOSE WATER FLOW 0 t Z "x gni
FROM PUMP 8 of CLASS B RIPRAP w LL
�� � 15' FILTER FABRIC I"!
� � FLEXIBLE 15'to IC -
/ i DISCHARGE HOSE Inset°A°
Dewatering Bag
qi. 0
• G
�V'o�����C7( 3'MIN SAND BAG
— Qlo �U 7 CREST (24"X 12"X 6") -..
I�i�o�G���I� ��� + OR STONE. . ,�
��Ormc . , - ,---) / IMPERVIOUS SHEETING STABILIZED OUTLET USING CLASS B \÷�(D. --.\P
��° �o ���a �� NO TALLER RIPRAP TRENCHED INTO EXISTING O �, a
o �a0 � / THAN EXISTING FLOW GROUND A MINIMUM OF 6". SIZE AND Q4 Gj� .\
4 �� � �G� 6 ACTIVE WORK AREA -✓ STREAM DEPTH �„ LOCATION TO BE DETERMINED IN THE `�
hi, !���� ���� �� FIELD BY THE ENGINEER. ��
,�(�(7° a����� t • ,..., • • • • • • • • • • ,...• • • • • FLEXIBLE DISCHARGE HOSE FROM G
�(.--\(7O �� PUMP AROUND PUMP HELD IN PLACE
OUTLET PIPE DIAMETER 24" - , ..,,_)(--1���<7c-) -��-0(7o Inset"B„ 10'MIN. WITH SAND BAGS AS NEEDED.
— �� < INTAKE HOSE Impervious Dike
�����0 ��� IMPERVIOUS DIKE
o ���� DEWATERING (SEE INSET"B")
�� I PUMP
.41.:•If 00
\,a,a , , , � FILTER FABRIC
AN
1/1 ' Inset"C"
Stabilized Outlet
DISCHARGE HOSE 10'X 5'STABILIZED OUTLET rt
DEWATERING BAG USING CLASS B RIPRAP AND
(SEE INSET"A") NCDOT TYPE 2 FILTER FABRIC. a)
(SEE INSET"C") NOTE: rt
1. CONTRACTOR SHALL PERFORM ALL STREAM WORK IN THE DRY, rt ft
Plan View UTILIZING PUMP AROUND SYSTEMS.
®
Outlet Protection ®Pump Around System 2. 4"PUMP SIZE PROPOSED.CONTRACTOR AND ENGINEER TO FIELD O
Not to Scale Not to Scale VERIFY SIZE AND ADJUST AS NEEDED BASED ON FIELD CONDITIONS. ;•-.
3. PROVIDE STABILIZED OUTLET TO STREAM BED. cn (rt
,
• V
o , to
BUFFER WIDTH DIBBLE BAR 3 •- (CI
VARIES
r a ;IiII a a
PLANTING BAR SHALL HAVE A ;!�;I , , NO.57 STONE Z
_ULL •12IN CHANNEL . ‘.. .. ‘.. INCHES WIDE AND 1 INCH • • ;r to O
THICK AT CENTER. i • .•:•••�• •:•••44bb•._.!•�!•�•�. U
ROOTING PRUNING WORK AR:• ���������;: �:�:�:�:�:�:••;:�;:�:�:�:�:�) • '�
SPACING PER _''_"'�.y:�:�:�:�:�:�:�:�:= :- i
PLANTING PLAN ALL ROOTS SHALL BE PRUNED :.:::001P::::�::::::...:�::::::
Section View
TO AN APPORIATE LENGTH �•%'`'••`••'•�•'•'•�•'•••'••��•%' }'
TO PREVENT 1-ROOTING. MININNIPP 0
`"N CLASS B RIPRAP p in—Cr:,
O
O O O O O O 20ft
IC.
INSTALL AND MAINTAIN THREE
Top View 1-
��• •���•�:•�• CHECK DAMS LOCATED AT
�,,,. ,1`,,,, '','''. ��`� °'� . •• •••• •• DOWNSTREAM LIMITS OF PROJECT.
'' �� r N0.57STONEMINIMUM MIN. SPILLWAY CREST
!� i i i i i i .�K•ti ,i e i i i i �••i.••••••••••••.•�•.• 121NCHES ON UPSTREAM FACE „�;� ;
� 0000000000 � -•'"-�'•-�-•'�-�Idd •*::�� CLASS B RIPRAP
/•••••••...i4..
INSERT THE DIBBLE,OR REMOVE THE DIBBLE,OR INSERT THE DIBBLE,OR PUSH THE DIBBLE,OR PULL BACK ON THE REMOVE THE DIBBLE,OR ••tt•e:•ot!.
SHOVEL,STRAIGHT DOWN SHOVEL,AND PUSH THE SHOVEL,SEVERAL INCHES SHOVEL,DOWN TO HANDLE TO CLOSE THE SHOVEL,AND CLOSE AND v
INTO THE SOIL TO THE SEEDLING ROOTS DEEP IN FRONT OF THE THE FULL DEPTH OF BOTTOM OF THE FIRM UP THE OPENING Plan View I 5'MIN.I . E
FULL DEPTH OF THE BLADE INTO THE PLANTING HOLE. SEEDLING AND PUSH THE THE BLADE. PLANTING HOLD. THEN WITH YOUR HEEL. BE u°
AND PULL BACK ON THE PULL THE SEEDLING BACK BLADE HALFWAY INTO PUSH FORWARD TO CLOSE CAREFUL TO AVOID Section A-A' _
HANDLE TO OPEN THE UP TO THE CORRECT THE SOIL. TWIST AND THE TOP,ELIMINATING AIR DAMAGING THE SEEDLING. TOP OF BANK 2 c
PLANTING HOLE. (DO NOT PLANTING DEPTH(THE PUSH THE HANDLE POCKETS AROUND THE I-•.— 20' —..1 z/ STREAM w
ROCK THE SHOVEL BACK ROOT COLLAR SHOULD BE 1 FORWARD TO CLOSE THE ROOT. WORK FLOW 20 WIDTH 1 o v
AND FORTH AS THIS TO 3 INCHES BELOW THE TOP OF THE SLIT TO HOLD AREA ��;fc6„/ _
CAUSES SOIL IN THE SOIL SURFACE). GENTLY THE SEEDLING IN PLACE. ' c,
PLANTING HOLE TO BE SHAKE THE SEEDLING TO
COMPACTED,INHIBITING ALLOW THE ROOTS TO
ROOT GROWTH. STRAIGHTEN OUT. DO NOT CLASS B RIPRAP 3 z x
E TWIST OR SPIN THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REMOVE TOE OF SLOPE w.,
SEEDLING OR LEAVE THE Profile View
ROOTSI-ROOTED. SEDIMENT WHEN DEPTH Section B-B'
NOTES: REACHES 12".
1. ALL SOILS WITHIN THE BUFFER PLANTING 'n
AREA SHALL BE DISKED,AS REQUIRED,PRIOR ®Bare Root Planting ®TemporaryRock Sediment Dam ,_ E u ,
TO PLANTING.
2. ALL PLANTS SHALL BE PROPERLY HANDLED Not to Scale Not to Scale w '°
3
PRIOR TO INSTALLATION TO INSURE SURVIVAL. d o

'" - TRANSPLANTED VEGETATION V
AND ROOTMASS
TRANSPLANTED VEGETATION
AN D ROOTM ASS Z����m o
z
TRANSPLANTED SOD AND ROOTMASS i
' TOP OF BANK2.
S 1- -co- - TOP OF BANK °o z N m z°
\ 4 EROSION CONTROL tda4ILLZ ''v oMATTING(TYP.) T -) s,,°'
TRANSPLANTED SOD AND ROOTMASS a z Q F 2 E
H
TOE OF SLOPE LL 1140
TOP OF BANK \/ - - TOP OF BANK FLOW0011111111
e�e�e�e�'�rr
EROSION CONTROL - - - - - - - Section View r.iiiiiii Meff d.u_
MATTING(TYP.) Riffle Installation Plan View CONSTRUCTED RIFFLE
TOE OF SLOPE Riffle Installation
FLOW
Section View 4�
TRANSPLANTED VEGETATION TOP OF BANK `,
Riffle Installation Plan View CONSTRUCTED RIFFLE AND ROOTMASS 0 �- 0�
Riffle Installation EROSION CONTROL ti����0��
MATTING(TYP.) ��" Q� .��
NOTES: + +1. PREPARE THE BANK WHERE THE SOD MAT WILL BE GO÷��
TRANSPLANTED BY RAKING&FERTILIZING.
2. EXCAVATE TRANSPLANT SOD MATS WITH A WIDE \
BUCKET AND AS MUCH ADDITIONAL SOIL MATERIAL AS
POSSIBLE. Section View
3. PLACE TRANSPLANT ON THE BANK TO BE STABILIZED. Pool Installation
4. SECURE WITH SOD STAPLES. NOTES:
5. FILL IN ANY HOLES AROUND THE TRANSPLANT AND 1. BANK TO BE STABILIZED THAT WILL ACCOMMODATE THE SIZE OF
COMPACT. or TRANSPLANT TO BE PLACED.
6. ANY LOOSE SOIL LEFT IN THE STREAM SHOULD BE oQo�` °'•q- 2. EXCAVATE TRANSPLANT. EXCAVATE THE ENTIRE ROOT MASS
REMOVED. 6, AND AS MUCH ADDITIONAL SOIL MATERIAL AS POSSIBLE. IF
7. PLACE MULTIPLE TRANSPLANTS CLOSE TOGETHER SUCH A.64
�/ ENTIRE ROOT MASS CANNOT BE EXCAVATED IN ONE BUCKET
®Transplanted Sod Mats THAT THEY TOUCH. ��J Plan View LOAD,THE TRANSPLANT IS TOO LARGE AND ANOTHER SHOULD '"t
8. INSTALL EROSION CONTROL MATTING ABOVE Pool Installation BE SELECTED.
Not to Scale TRANSPLANTED SOD MATS. 3. PLACE TRANSPLANT IN THE BANK TO BE STABILIZED SO THATCD
VEGETATION IS ORIENTATED VERTICALLY.
4. FILL IN ANY HOLES AROUND THE TRANSPLANT AND COMPACT.
®Transplanted Vegetation 5. ANY LOOSE SOIL LEFT IN THE STREAM SHOULD BE REMOVED.
Not to Scale 6. PLACE MULTIPLE TRANSPLANTS CLOSE TOGETHER SUCH THAT C) O
THEY TOUCH. •r-1—)-I
r ,
V
•O -
==_ z
CLAY MATERIAL PLACED IN 6"TO 8"LIFTS
EACH LIFT SHOULD BE COMPACTED USING A SHEEP'S FOOT ROLLER OR SIMILAR to O 0
LIVE STAKE(TYP) .,
ALONG TOP OF BANK ft I—�
SEE PLAN VIEW FOR SPACING
EROSION CONTROL NONWOVEN
3'OUTSIDE TOP OF BANK MATTING TRIM FILTER FABRIC BELOW FILTER FABRIC +)
(SEE DETAIL) GRADED SURFACE
ft
i TOP OF BANK DITCH BACKFILL
JUNCUS PLUG(TYP) /** z �l/?�G j��j//��/ �j\ ®- `7`.A\\-�\i
TOE O F SLOPE �p .� \%��\���\%\\\\\\\\ \%\\ \�
�b� / ?'\firm EXISTING DITCH FLOW i\\/\\%\\j\\\ \\\ \\/\\/ 6"TO 8"LIFT
OE OF SLOPE Section View-UT2 \X\�\j\\/\ /\\\�\�\\
3'-5' SPACING FOR 1/2"TO 2" 2'TO 3'LIVE STAKE
LIVE STAKES
SPACINGNG TAPERED AT BOTTOM FOR DIAMETER EXISTING DITCH BOTTOM
JUNCUS PLUGS 8.0'
Plan View-UT2 Profile View
Live Stake Detail
NOTE:lac NOTES:
®Live Staking&Juncus Plugs 1. LIVE STAKES TO BE PLANTED IN AREAS AS F
Not to Scale SHOWN ON PLANS AND DIRECTED BY THEEa • CLAY MATERIAL TO BE APPROVED BY
ENGINEER. ENGINEER OR ON-SITE INSPECTOR.
g • ALL WOODY AND HERBACEOUS N G
VEGETATION MUST BE REMOVED FROM /')
AREA TO BE PLUGGED PRIOR TO u J
INSTALLATION
_ • PLUG SHOULD EXTEND FROM TOP OF LC)
DITCH TO TOP OF DITCH WITHIN THE ®Wetland Ditch Plug
DITCH CROSS SECTION "
Not to Scale e "' m
3
x� /\ d o

,t- 1r 1
2 m
Q
t < w v�mLL
o'r,�o
aw �znmz
o�
gzm=2r v
a= QLL:
�w LL
.. °o.-"s
HEAD OF RIFFLE(TYP.)
VARIES PER ///���/// i'`If C/,--- _-___-- Ol�
VARIES PER VARIES i�aat/
NATIVE ROCK EQUIVALENT TYPICAL SECTION _--- : ,f �.,jj! G
FLOW PROFILE - PER TO CLASS I RIPRAP OR ON SITE STONE ay� " --
FLOW
PROFILE MEETING CLASS I GRADATION CONNECT TO ,), y i
FLOW �� HEAD OF POOL(TYP.) EXISTING ��� �i�
SLOPE VARIES DEPTH VARIES GROUND / �q���'%�f%%% /,
PER PROF/LE 2I PER PROFILE tit �I /pad' )(,)k.(J‘'
'.A, e\\\�_&-` 1 _-1111 c S� \\s\b- 1 -5 \ice « 3oo6
.al �\\ ,-1�1 ra....1_,-\ �-�\\\\� � 1 � �_ ��\�% \\\%\, 1.0'MIN RIFFLE ' __ - ___- __.__
''\\j-. -` 1.1�-\1-\\�---1\�-'-k- ���\ MATERIAL r1 / '
FILL MATERIAL BOULDERS �� J/FILTER FABRIC - a�\\-�\\ Section AA' i3 %i_---- =� -
SPSC Profile ,�/I - ., ___,,
_ VARIES PER _ PROFILE TO BE PROVIDED WITH FINIAL � \;:�-r ----�_`�-- --- -__--_ ;:�, �
TYPICAL SECTION ---y___,l/ �� ;- V.;,,; `Y__ �_
MIX OF NATIVE ROCK � -�-- -- _ _ -
CONSTRUCTION PLANS :_- _ ct
EQUIVALENT TO A B
CLASS I RIP-RAP _-____%--_________- _-__ _ -- `�JI,`�;:1 ,,� - _ ?-I
HEAD OF RIFFLE(TYP.) ---- _-_--- - - ----�``�'�.'-:�..• 1;: O
DEPTH VARIES CONNECT TO - _ -- --_------'- _- _ \,\�, �'•'�--
BOULDERS - _ - _- --_ :q •• '
HEAD OF POOL(TYP.) PER PROFILE EXISTING __--__-____ _" - \ •1--1
�, 1 GROUND - _ _ :___._-�\\;K'.. ' (J) C
t. //
�y•i �� 4i �•� RHO"r 4 V!r it n
0:440.0040
Iti7$iri7$i 414 w�i eeeil, Ri)ir•i)fi7-y, i n
i�,AO,�1N�,�1„ •16 H�'T�w�'T��b • ,,ile ,,,, �<.`. Section B-B' -` - A `\\\0, .- - Z
►4i1�7,'�'�;�i !�+ci}�}44 '�t„ft. ,���`�� Plan View \ ``,?;;•,:,
NOTES: •'ci V
®
Step-Pool Stormwater Conveyance (SPSC) 1.IF NATIVE ROCK IS NOT AVAILABLE,QUARRIED ��,,�
r r r r r ROCK MAY BE SUBSTITUTED IN THE SAME SIZES. Ct i
EXCAVATE POOL Not to Scale
r r r r r PER PROFILE
2.ALL ROCK SHALL BE HETEROGENEOUS AND y
r r r r r A' B' WELL MIXED.
r r r r r SPSC Plan View Profile View 3.BOULDERS SHOULD HAVE A MINIMUM Ct
r r r r r DIMENSION OF 2'x 2'x 1'.
3
c
le
5 G G Q
W^
•
i r /
E
311
x� ..\ d o

Rr
GROUND STABILIZATION AND MATERIALS HANDLING PRACTICES FOR COMPLIANCE WITH EQUIPMENT AND VEHICLE MAINTENANCE ONSITE CONCRETE WASHOUT Q o o m o 0
THE NCGO1 CONSTRUCTION GENERAL PERMIT STRUCTURE WITH LINER z���m LL
1. Maintain vehicles and equipment to prevent discharge of fluids. g z rymz
Implementing the details and specifications on this plan sheet will result in the construction A B °<_ ,..P, v o 2. Provide drip pans under any stored equipment. s,, s°:Wi „ °E„ APES tr}t
zactivity being considered compliant with the Ground Stabilization and Materials Handling °a ,„P E o o '°aM't ° SEE _> ^R
3. Identify leaks and repair as soon as feasible,or remove leaking equipment from the o o "'"'"° c m
°��"'.'
sections of the NCGO1 Construction General Permit(Sections E and F,respectively). The project. [LII °R°'""` o o / of°L 1 w°.,~LL,
permittee shall comply with the Erosion and Sediment Control plan approved by the o o " LL
delegated authority having jurisdiction.All details and specifications shown on this sheet 4. Collect all spent fluids,store in separate containers and properly dispose as o s o„a
hazardous waste(recycle when possible).
may not apply depending on site conditions and the delegated authority having jurisdiction.
�,�oN A-A
5. Remove leaking vehicles and construction equipment from service until the problem rE,�„o:°„o of„ `.:,,�„, F�EL°
�El„a;„�"„E� `�,a�,�a"A�„�
SECTION E:GROUND STABILIZATION has been corrected. �I„„°°I ""°"`CONCRETE
" ° E°"'„`°'„ '`E„„EE ° rvao°ga�oPo.°
2 THE STRUCTURES°APa„.o��° °.
6. Bring used fuels,lubricants,coolants,hydraulic fluids and other petroleum products aEA°„:°'�x°r'„E°'R°°'°RE°° CAPACITY TO PROVIDE ADEQUATE
Required Ground Stabilization Timeframes PLAN aE ,„ ° ,„s°„„°E„°NEEDS TO„°°E„�E PLAN
OOLONG CAPPS,I„CHE„°«EE°°A° "'"'"°""
to a recycling or disposal center that handles these materials. 4�
Stabilize within this SEITcPro;N WASHOUT
`°"'"
many calendar BELOW GRADE WASHOUT STRUCTURE ABOVE GRADE WASHOUT STRUCTURE �.
Site Area Description days after ceasing Timeframe variations LITTER,BUILDING MATERIAL AND LAND CLEARING WASTE NOT °m�E ° �°SC-
days ti\ �00-.6"7
land disturbance 1. Never bury or burn waste. Place litter and debris in approved waste containers. 4� '�5�' •��
(a) Perimeter dikes, 2. Provide a sufficient number and size of waste containers(e.g dumpster,trash CONCRETE WASHOUTS ��
swales,ditches,and 7 None receptacle)on site to contain construction and domestic wastes. 1. Do not discharge concrete or cement slurry from the site. G)
perimeter slopes 3. Locate waste containers at least 50 feet away from storm drain inlets and surface 2. Dispose of,or recycle settled,hardened concrete residue in accordance with local
(b) High Quality Water 7 waters unless no other alternatives are reasonably available. and state solid waste regulations and at an approved facility.
None
(HOW)Zones 4. Locate waste containers on areas that do not receive substantial amounts of runoff 3. Manage washout from mortar mixers in accordance with the above item and in
If slopes are 10'or less in length and are from upland areas and does not drain directly to a storm drain,stream or wetland. addition place the mixer and associated materials on impervious barrier and within
(c) Slopes steeper than p g 3:1 7 not steeper than 2:1,14 days are 5. Cover waste containers at the end of each workday and before storm events or lot perimeter silt fence.
allowed provide secondary containment. Repair or replace damaged waste containers. 4. Install temporary concrete washouts per local requirements,where applicable. If an
-7 days for slopes greater than 50'in 6. Anchor all lightweight items in waste containers during times of high winds. alternate method or product is to be used,contact your approval authority for
length and with slopes steeper than 4:1 7. Empty waste containers as needed to prevent overflow. Clean up immediately if review and approval. If local standard details are not available,use one of the two
-7 days for perimeter dikes,swales, containers overflow. types of temporary concrete washouts provided on this detail.
(d) Slopes 3:1 to 4:1 14 ditches,perimeter slopes and HOW 8. Dispose waste off-site at an approved disposal facility. 5. Do not use concrete washouts for dewatering or storing defective curb or sidewalk Ti
Zones 9. On business days,clean up and dispose of waste in designated waste containers. sections. Stormwater accumulated within the washout may not be pumped into or a)
-10 days for Falls Lake Watershed discharged to the storm drain system or receiving surface waters. Liquid waste must Ti
-7 days for perimeter dikes,swales, PAINT AND OTHER LIQUID WASTE be pumped out and removed from project. Ti
ditches,perimeter slopes and HOW Zones 1. Do not dump6. Locate washouts at least 50 feet from storm drain inlets and surface waters unless it
(e) Areas with slopes p paint and other liquid waste into storm drains,streams or wetlands.
p can be shown that no other alternatives are reasonably available. At a minimum, O
flatter than 4:1 14 -10 days for Falls Lake Watershed unless 2. Locate paint washouts at least 50 feet away from storm drain inlets and surface a--'
there is zero slope waters unless no other alternatives are reasonably available. install protection of storm drain inlet(s)closest to the washout which could receive cr rt
spills or overflow. U
Note:After thepermanent cessation of construction activities,anyareas with temporary 3. Contain liquid wastes in a controlled area. o
p Y 7. Locate washouts in an easily accessible area,on level ground and install a stone O ,. O
ground stabilization shall be converted to permanent ground stabilization as soon as 4. Containment must be labeled,sized and placed appropriately for the needs of site. entrance pad in front of the washout. Additional controls may be required by the . t2iC�
practicable but in no case longer than 90 calendar days after the last land disturbing 5. Prevent the discharge of soaps,solvents,detergents and other liquid wastes from approving authority. O U
activity. Temporary ground stabilization shall be maintained in a manner to render the construction sites. 8. Install at least one sign directing concrete trucks to the washout within the project •bA Z Z
surface stable against accelerated erosion until permanent ground stabilization is achieved. limits. Post signage on the washout itself to identify this location.
PORTABLE TOILETS
GROUND STABILIZATION SPECIFICATION 9. Remove leavings from the washout when at approximately 75%capacity to limit -�
1. Install portable toilets on level ground,at least 50 feet away from storm drains, overflow events. Replace the tarp,sand bags or other temporary structural rn O0
Stabilize the ground sufficiently so that rain will not dislodge the soil. Use one of the streams or wetlands unless there is no alternative reasonably available. If 50 foot components when no longer functional. When utilizing alternative or proprietary "ci
techniques in the table below: offset is not attainable,provide relocation ofportable toilet behind silt fence orplace
products,follow manufacturer's instructions. � �
El Temporary Stabilization ' Permanent Stabilization on a gravel pad and surround with sand bags. 10. At the completion of the concrete work,remove remaining leavings and dispose of
•Temporary grass seed covered with straw or • Permanent grass seed covered with straw or 2. Provide staking or anchoring of portable toilets during periods of high winds or in high
in an approved disposal facility. Fill pit,if applicable,and stabilize any disturbance
other mulches and tackifiers other mulches and tackifiers foot traffic areas. caused by removal of washout.
• Hydroseeding •Geotextile fabrics such as permanent soil 3. Monitor portable toilets for leaking and properly dispose of any leaked material.
• Rolled erosion control products with or reinforcement matting Utilize a licensed sanitary waste hauler to remove leaking portable toilets and replace
without temporary grass seed • Hydroseeding with properly operating unit.
•Appropriately applied straw or other mulch •Shrubs or other permanent plantings covered HERBICIDES,PESTICIDES AND RODENTICIDES
• Plastic sheeting with mulch 1. Store and apply herbicides,pesticides and rodenticides in accordance with label
• Uniform and evenly distributed ground cover EARTHEN STOCKPILE MANAGEMENT restrictions.
sufficient to restrain erosion 1. Show stockpile locations on plans. Locate earthen-material stockpile areas at least 2. Store herbicides,pesticides and rodenticides in their original containers with the
•Structural methods such as concrete,asphalt or 50 feet away from storm drain inlets,sediment basins,perimeter sediment controls
retaining walls label,which lists directions for use,ingredients and first aid steps in case of
and surface waters unless it can be shown no other alternatives are reasonably accidental poisoning.
ia • Rolled erosion control products with grass seed available.
2. Protect stockpile with silt fence installed along toe of slope with a minimum offset of 3. Do not store herbicides,pesticides and rodenticides in areas where flooding is
POLYACRYLAMIDES(PAMS)AND FLOCCULANTS five feet from the toe of stockpile. possible or where they may spill or leak into wells,stormwater drains,ground water
- or surface water. If a spill occurs,clean area immediately.
1. Select flocculants that are appropriate for the soils being exposed during 3. Provide stable stone access point when feasible.la 4. Do not stockpile these materials onsite.
construction,selecting from the NC DWR List of Approved PAMS/Flocculants. 4. Stabilize stockpile within the timeframes provided on this sheet and in accordance
2. Apply flocculants at or before the inlets to Erosion and Sediment Control Measures. with the approved plan and any additional requirements. Soil stabilization is defined
3. Apply flocculants at the concentrations specified in the NC DWR List of Approved as vegetative,physical or chemical coverage techniques that will restrain accelerated HAZARDOUS AND TOXIC WASTE
PAMS/Flocculants and in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions. erosion on disturbed soils for temporary or permanent control needs. _
z 1. Create designated hazardous waste collection areas on-site.
4. Provide ponding area for containment of treated Stormwater before discharging 2. Place hazardous waste containers under cover or in secondary containment.
Ea offsite.
3. Do not store hazardous chemicals,drums or bagged materials directly on the ground. z x
i 5. Store flocculants in leak-proof containers that are kept under storm-resistant cover 5 w K
or surrounded by secondary containment structures.
NCGO1 GROUND STABILIZATION AND MATERIALS HANDLING EFFECTIVE: 04/01/19
E
3
x ..\ d o

m
PART III PART III PART III
SELF-INSPECTION,RECORDKEEPING AND REPORTING SELF-INSPECTION,RECORDKEEPING AND REPORTING SELF-INSPECTION,RECORDKEEPING AND REPORTING Q o o°moo
z���mLL
�� °ozmz
SECTION A:SELF-INSPECTION SECTION B:RECORDKEEPING SECTION C:REPORTING lit}i v c a g
Self-inspections are required duringnormal business hours in accordance with the table Q-, ti
p q 1.E&SC Plan Documentation 1.Occurrences that Must be Reported o m v x
below. When adverse weather or site conditions would cause the safety of the inspection a w a�LL
The approved E&SC plan as well as any approved deviation shall be kept on the site. The Permittees shall report the following occurrences: ._ it
personnel to be in jeopardy,the inspection may be delayed until the next business day on approved E&SC plan must be kept up-to-date throughout the coverage under this permit. (a) Visible sediment deposition in a stream or wetland.
which it is safe to perform the inspection. In addition,when a storm event of equal to or The following items pertaining to the E&SC plan shall be kept on site and available for
greater than 1.0 inch occurs outside of normal business hours,the self-inspection shall be inspection at all times during normal business hours.
performed upon the commencement of the next business day. Any time when inspections (b) Oil spills if:
were delayed shall be noted in the Inspection Record. Item to Document Documentation Requirements • They are 25 gallons or more,
Frequency (a) Each E&SC measure has been installed Initial and date each E&SC measure on a copy • They are less than 25 gallons but cannot be cleaned up within 24 hours, -.L
Inspect (during normal Inspection records must include: and does not significantly deviate from the of the approved E&SC plan or complete,date 4--
business hours) • They cause sheen on surface waters(regardless of volume),or
locations,dimensions and relative elevations and sign an inspection report that lists each �CSo� C1�
(1)Rain gauge Daily Daily rainfall amounts. shown on the approved E&SC plan. E&SC measure shown on the approved E&SC • They are within 100 feet of surface waters(regardless of volume). �,� 0���
maintained in If no daily rain gauge observations are made during weekend or plan. This documentation is required upon the �-
goodworking holiday periods, and no individual-day rainfall information is �0�� .\
order available,record the cumulative rain measurement for those un- initial installation of the E&SC measures or if �-
attended days (and this will determine if a site inspection is the E&SC measures are modified after initial (c) Releases of hazardous substances in excess of reportable quantities under Section 311 C1�
needed). Days on which no rainfall occurred shall be recorded as installation. of the Clean Water Act(Ref:40 CFR 110.3 and 40 CFR 117.3)or Section 102 of CERCLA C
"zero." The permittee may use another rain-monitoring device (Ref:40 CFR 302.4)or G.S.143-215.85.
approved by the Division. (b) A phase of grading has been completed. Initial and date a copy of the approved E&SC
(2) E&SC At least once per 1. Identification of the measures inspected, plan or complete,date and sign an inspection
Measures 7 calendar days 2. Date and time of the inspection, report to indicate completion of the (d) Anticipated bypasses and unanticipated bypasses.
and within 24 3. Name of the person performing the inspection, construction phase.
hours of a rain 4. Indication of whether the measures were operating
event>1.0 inch in properly, (c) Ground cover is located and installed Initial and date a copy of the approved E&SC
24 hours 5. Description of maintenance needs for the measure, in accordance with the approved E&SC plan or complete,date and sign an inspection (e) Noncompliance with the conditions of this permit that may endanger health or the
6. Description,evidence,and date of corrective actions taken. plan. report to indicate compliance with approved environment.
(3)Stormwater At least once per 1. Identification of the discharge outfalls inspected, ground cover specifications.
discharge 7 calendar days 2. Date and time of the inspection,
outfalls(sons) and within 24 3. Name of the person performing the inspection, (d) The maintenance and repair Complete,date and sign an inspection report. 2.Reporting Timeframes and Other Requirements
hours of a rain 4. Evidence of indicators of stormwater pollution such as oil requirements for all E&SC measures Ti
event>1.0 inch in sheen,floating or suspended solids or discoloration, have been performed. After a permittee becomes aware of an occurrence that must be reported,he shall contact
24 hours 5. Indication of visible sediment leaving the site, the appropriate Division regional office within the timeframes and in accordance with the a)
6. Description,evidence,and date of corrective actions taken. (e) Corrective actions have been taken Initial and date a copy of the approved E&SC Ti
other requirements listed below. Occurrences outside normal business hours may also be
(4)Perimeter of At least once per If visible sedimentation is found outside site limits,then a record to E&SC measures. plan or complete,date and sign an inspection
Ti rt
site 7 calendar days of the following shall be made: report to indicate the completion of the reported to the Department's Environmental Emergency Center personnel at(800)
and within 24 1. Actions taken to clean up or stabilize the sediment that has left corrective action. 858-0368. C
hours of a rain the site limits, •r�-I
event>1.0 inch in 2. Description,evidence,and date of corrective actions taken,and 2.Additional Documentation to be Kept on Site !Occurrence Reporting Timeframes(After Discovery)and Other Requirements Cn rt
24 hours 3. An explanation as to the actions taken to control future In addition to the E&SC plan documents above,the following items shall be kept on the (a)Visible sediment • Within 24 hours,an oral or electronic notification. (J
releases. site and available for inspectors at all times during normal business hours,unless the deposition in a • Within 7 calendar days,a report that contains a description of the p a-
(5)Streams or At least once per if the stream or wetland has Increased visible sedimentation or a stream or wetland '- a--r
wetlands onsite 7 calendar days stream has visible increased turbidity from the construction Division provides a site-specific exemption based on unique site conditions that make sediment and actions taken to address the cause c f the deposition. C-)
or offsite and within 24 activity,then a record of the following shall be made: this requirement not practical: Division staff may waive the requirement for a written report on a ct Q U
(where hours of a rain 1. Description,evidence and date of corrective actions taken,and Case-by-case basis. Z Z
accessible) event>1.0 inch in 2. Records of the required reports to the appropriate Division (a) This General Permit as well as the Certificate of Coverage,after it is received. • If the stream is named on the NC 43(0)Ilse as impaired for sediment-
24 hours Regional Office per Part III,Section C,Item(2)(a)of this permit. related causes,the permittee may be required to perform additional
(6)Ground After each phase 1. The phase of grading(installation of perimeter E&SC monitoring,inspections or apply more stringent practices if staff p
stabilization of grading measures,clearing and grubbing,installation of storm (b) Records of inspections made during the previous twelve months. The permittee shall
measures drainage facilities,completion of all land-disturbing record the required observations on the Inspection Record Form provided by the determine that additional requirements are needed to assure compliance
activity,construction or redevelopment,permanent with the federal or state impaired-waters conditions. � •r-I
Division or a similar inspection form that includes all the required elements. Use of
ground cover). �(h)Oil spills and • Within 24 hours,an oral or electronic notification. The notification tt I_
2. Documentation that the required ground stabilization electronically-available records in lieu of the required paper copies will be allowed if release of shall include information about the date,time,nature,volume and ''�
measures have been provided within the required shown to provide equal access and utility as the hard-copy records. ' hazardous location of the spill or release.
timeframe or an assurance that they will be provided as I substances per Item ft
soon as possible. 3.Documentation to be Retained for Three Years 1(h)-[c),above
All data used to complete the e-NOI and all inspection records shall be maintained for a period
NOTE:The rain inspection resets the required 7 calendar dayinspection requirement. of threeyears after project completion and made available upon request. [40 CFR 122.41] . by asses Anticipated • A reportat hasr tenlde anays evaluation
the dote
of the o the bypass,patedIf possible.a ld.
p q � p q p J p p q
bypasses[40 CFR The report shall include an evaluation of anticipated quality and
122.41(m)(3)l effect of the bypass.
PART II,SECTION G,ITEM(4) (di Unanticipated • Within 24 harms,an oral or electronic notification.
bypasses 140 CFR • Within 7 calendar days,a report that includes an evaluation of the
DRAW DOWN OF SEDIMENT BASINS FOR MAINTENANCE OR CLOSE OUT 122.41(m)(3)1 quality and effect of the bypass.
(e)Noncompliance • Wkhhi24 hours,an oral or electronic notification.
Sediment basins and traps that receive runoff from drainage areas of one acre or more shall use outlet structures that withdraw water from the surface when these devices need to be drawn down with the conditions • Within 7 calendar days,a report that contains a description of the
3. for maintenance or close out unless this is infeasible. The circumstances in which it is not feasible to withdraw water from the surface shall be rare(for example,times with extended cold weather). , of this permit that noncompliance,and its causes;the period of noncompliance,
Lu
Non-surface withdrawals from sediment basins shall be allowed only when all of the following criteria have been met: . may endanger including exact dates and times,and if the noncompliance has not
health or the been corrected,the anticipated time noncompliance is expected to
/ (a) The E&SC plan authority has been provided with documentation of the non-surface withdrawal and the specific time periods or conditions in which it will occur. The non-surface withdrawal ' environment[40 continue;and steps taken or planned to reduce,eliminate,and
CFR 122A1(1)(7)1 prevent reoccurrence of the noncompliance.[40 CFR 122.41(1)(6).
shall not commence until the E&SC plan authority has approved these items, • Division staff may waive the requirement fora written report on a
(b) The non-surface withdrawal has been reported as an anticipated bypass in accordance with Part III,Section C,Item(2)(c)and(d)of this permit, I rase-by-case basis.
(c) Dewatering discharges are treated with controls to minimize discharges of pollutants from stormwater that is removed from the sediment basin. Examples of appropriate controls include _ _
.. properly sited,designed and maintained dewatering tanks,weir tanks,and filtration systems, Fa f
(d) Vegetated,upland areas of the sites or a properly designed stone pad is used to the extent feasible at the outlet of the dewatering treatment devices described in Item(c)above,
(e) Velocity dissipation devices such as check dams,sediment traps,and riprap are provided at the discharge points of all dewatering devices,and z x
E (f) Sediment removed from the dewatering treatment devices described in Item(c)above is disposed of in a manner that does not cause deposition of sediment into waters of the United States. w ° M
NCGO1 SELF-INSPECTION, RECORDKEEPING AND REPORTING EFFECTIVE: 04/01/19
E
3

or V NOTES: NOTES:
1. PROVIDE TURNING RADIUS SUFFICIENT TO 1. CONSTRUCT STREAM CROSSING WHEN FLOW IS AT
ACCOMMODATE LARGE TRUCKS. NORMAL BASEFLOW.
5. LOCATE CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE AT ALL POINTS OF 2. MINIMIZE CLEARING AND EXCAVATION OF STREAMBANKS. a
INGRESS AND EGRESS UNTIL SITE IS STABILIZED. DO NOT EXCAVATE CHANNEL BOTTOM. Z 0 o m o
PROVIDE FREQUENT CHECKS OF THE DEVICE AND 3. INSTALL STREAM CROSSING PERPENDICULAR TO THE Z N m LL
TIMELY MAINTENANCE. FLOW. dt3r
� zrymz6. MUST BE MAINTAINED IN A CONDITION WHICH WILL 4. MAINTAIN CROSSING SO THAT RUNOFF IN THE w ''v'^oPREVENT TRACKING OR DIRECT FLOW OF MUD ONTO CONSTRUCTION ROAD DOES NOT ENTER EXISTING 0
O m s..x
E Z�QILL STREETS. PERIODIC TOP DRESSING WITH STONE WILL CHANNEL. w
BE NECESSARY. 5. STABILIZE AN ACCESS RAMP OF CLASS B STONE TO THE 1--1 LL
7. ANY MATERIAL TRACKED ONTO THE ROADWAY MUST EDGE OF THE MUD MAT.
BE CLEANED IMMEDIATELY. 6. CONTRACTOR SHALL DETERMINE AN APPROPRIATE RAMP
8. USE CLASS A STONE OR OTHER COARSE AGGREGATE ANGLE ACCORDING TO EQUIPMENT UTILIZED.
APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER.
9. PLACE FILTER FABRIC BENEATH STONE.
IIIIIIIII��� ��
I��IIIIII Y 7O O��O'
O e'
g •••••••ti,. WATER DIVERSION CHANNEL GO
..•,•;�••,•,�,•.�•t•lieet, 50' TIMBER MATS
�d' i • i i liikieh 10'MIN
AIO'lllll� ••••••••,,••••f \ '' / 7----H—CLAS1S°'B
'I
�� CLASS ASTONE • • • • • �.
n 8"MIN.DEPTH !a•'-:•.:a!,tie!•.•a�^ SUPPORT LOG ER FABRIC
.• • • �� 12"0 MIN.
..il,.•,,,4,.� STONE
!, 12'
a)
®Construction Entrance %• ®Temporary Stream Crossing Timber Mat
Not to Scale •••ri•••%, /--\ Not to Scale O
•
• U
•O -,
STEEL FENCE POST STRUCTURAL STONE rt 05
WIRE FENCE 1'-6"MIN (CLASS"B"STONE) bA z
HARDWARE CLOTH END OF FILTER FABRIC •
FILTER STONE L SILT FENCE
h-2 -j (NO.5 OR NO.57 1'-6' MIN.
STONE) .ti 3'MAX. ,..:.. to O
STONE HEIGHT I ^� U
ba"�'ts3 ',"' FILTER FABRIC
POST ?" ON GROUND ••'
3
if44' SILT FENCE BURY WIRE FENCE a • BURY WIRE FENCE,
AND HARDWARE CLOTH FILTER FABRIC, ft
END OF FILTER FABRIC STEEL FENCE POST AND HARDWARE 't
Plan View Section View SET MAX 2'APART Front View CLOTH IN TRENCH
INSTALLATION: SILT FENCE OUTLET:
REFER TO THE PLANS FOR LOCATIONS AND SPECIFICATIONS.DURING INSTALLATION OF THE SILT BARRIER OR JUST BELOW THE GAP IN THE BARRIER,PLACE A
SILT FENCE,INSPECT THE INSTALLATION TO DETERMINE IF OUTLETS ARE NEEDED ACCORDING TO THE CRITERIA LAYER OF FILTER FABRIC ON THE GROUND TO
SET FORTH IN THE SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE BARRIER AND FENCE.IF THERE ARE QUESTIONS OR PROBLEMS WITH PROTECT THE SOIL FROM EROSION BY OUTFLOW
THE LOCATION,EXTENT,OR METHOD OF INSTALLATION,CONTACT THE ENGINEER,ARCHITECT,OR RESPONSIBLE FROM THE OUTLET;STRUCTURAL STONE WILL
PERSONNEL ON THE SITE FOR ASSISTANCE.EROSION CONTROL PERSONNEL HAVE COPIES OF INSTRUCTIONS AND HOLD IN PLACE.
MAY HAVE PHOTOGRAPHS OF PROPERLY INSTALLED OUTLETS AS AN AID TO INSTALLATION. ALONG THE GAP WHERE THE OUTLET WILL GO,
IF THE SILT FENCE OUTLET IS NOT INSTALLED CORRECTLY THE FIRST TIME,IT WILL HAVE TO BE REBUILT. PLACE ADDITIONAL STEEL FENCE POSTS FOR
DETERMINE THE EXACT LOCATION ON THE GROUND BEFORE COMPLETING INSTALLATION OF THE SILT FENCE, STRENGTH.THE POSTS MUST BE A MAXIMUM OF
TAKING INTO CONSIDERATION: 2 FEET APART AND DRIVEN INTO SOLID GROUND
INSTALL THE OUTLET AT THE LOWEST POINT(S)IN THE BARRIER OR FENCE WHERE WATER WILL POND. AT LEAST 18 INCHES. v E
INSTALL THE OUTLET WHERE IT IS ACCESSIBLE FOR INSTALLATION,MAINTENANCE,AND REMOVAL. PLACE HARDWARE CLOTH(WELDED GALVANIZED E v
ALLOW AT LEAST: SCREEN WITH SQUARE 1/4-1/2-INCH HOLES)ON c u -t c
15 FEET BETWEEN THE BARRIER OR FENCE AND SINGLE-STORY BUILDINGS. THE UPHILL SIDE OF THE POSTS TO HOLD THE -o -
ts
25 FEET FOR FORK LIFTS BETWEEN THE BARRIER OR FENCE AND MULTIPLE-STORY BUILDINGS. WASHED STONE IN PLACE.PUT 6 INCHES OF THE 2 o o
10 FEET BETWEEN THE BARRIER OR FENCE AND THE TOE OF FILL SLOPES. BOTTOM OF THE CLOTH IN THE TRENCH AND ,.u oo
PLACE THE OUTLET SO THAT WATER FLOWING THROUGH IT WILL NOT CREATE AN EROSION HAZARD BELOW: FASTEN IT TO THE POSTS WITH LENGTHS OF o v o 0
AVOID STEEP SLOPES BELOW THE OUTLET AND AREAS WITHOUT PROTECTIVE VEGETATION.USE SLOPE DRAINS WIRE. �`- �`.c
IF NECESSARY. BURY THE BOTTOM OF THE HARDWARE CLOTH, it Li
DETERMINE THE LOCATION OF THE OUTLET:FOR A SILT BARRIER,WHEN THE TRENCH IS DUG TO BURY THE THE UPPER EDGE OF THE FILTER FABRIC BELOW
BOTTOM OF THE FABRIC BECAUSE THE BARRIER WILL BE OMITTED AT THE OUTLET;FOR A SILT FENCE,WHEN THE OUTLET,AND THE WIRE FENCE IN THE
THE WIRE FENCE IS IN PLACE BECAUSE THE FILTER FABRIC WILL BE OMITTED AT THE OUTLET. TRENCH AND COMPACT THE FILL. z x
REFER TO THE ILLUSTRATIONS OF THE OUTLET IN THE PLAN. PLACE CLASS"B"STRUCTURAL STONE ON THE N ^w
CLEAR STUMPS AND ROOTS FROM THE LOCATION OF THE OUTLET.CLEAR ADEQUATE ACCESS FOR THE UPHILL SIDE AND DOWNHILL SIDE OF THE V
EQUIPMENT NEEDED FOR INSTALLATION,MAINTENANCE,AND REMOVAL. OUTLET FENCE. •�
PLACE NO.5 OR NO.57 FILTER STONE ON TOP OF . ^
THE UPHILL STRUCTURAL STONE. u
® Temporary Silt Fence Gravel Outlet = E to o
Not Scale 3
d o j