20080213 Ver 2_401 Application_20131113

Environmental Consultants,
8412 Falls of Neuse Road, Suite 104, Raleigh, NC 27615 • Phone: [phone] •
sandec.com
To: US Army Corps of Engineers
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
Attn: James Lastinger
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, NC 27587
From: Deborah Edwards Shirley
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
Re: Powerhouse Church of Jesus Christ
Raleigh, Wake County, NC
November 7, 2013
S &EC Project # 9715.P1
NC DWR, 401 & Buffer Permitting Unit
Attn: Karen Higgins
Archdale Building — 9`s Floor
512 North Salisbury Street
Raleigh, NC 27604
zo-
On behalf of the applicant, Powerhouse Church of Jesus Christ (Attn: Ron Lucas), please find attached a complete
application and supplemental information requesting written concurrence from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
( USACE) and the N.C. Division of Water Resources (DWR) that the activities proposed below may proceed under
Nationwide Permit 39 and General Water Quality Certification 3890. Please contact me at (919) 846 -5900 if you have
any questions or require additional information.
PROJECT SUMMARY
Project Name
Powerhouse Church of Jesus Christ
Project Type
Commercial Development
Owner / Applicant
Powerhouse Church of Jesus Christ
County
Wake
Nearest Town
Raleigh
Waterbody Name
UT to Beamon Lake Marsh Creek
Basin
Neuse
Index Number
27- 33 -20 -1
Class
C, NSW
IMPACT SUMMARY
Stream Impact (acres):
0.013
Wetland Impact (acres):
0
Open Water Impact (acres):
0
Total Impact to Waters of the U.S. (acres)
0.013
Total Stream Impact (linear feet):
140
Attachments:
Pre - construction Notification (PCN) Application Form
Agent Authorization Form
NRCS Soil Survey Map & USGS Topographic Map
DWQ Buffer Determination letters (DWQ Project #04 -2014)
401 Water Quality Certification Approval (DWQ Project # 08 -0213)
USACE Statutory Notification letter
Existing Conditions & Site Plan (24x36 -DWR; 11x17- USACE)
Impact Exhibit
Stormwater Calculations & BMP O &M Manual (DWR only)
Construction Drawings- sheets C3.1, C3.3, C3.4, C3.5 & C3.6 (DWR only)
$240 DWR Application Fee
D @tr-Z�@U v
i';n E'tmn EOU4LL1rV
D MR ds ...

`O�ot W ATC19
o �
Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.3 Dec 10 2008
Pre - Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A. Applicant Information
1. Processing
1 a. Type(s) of approval sought from the
Corps:
®Section 404 Permit ❑Section 10 Permit
1b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 39 or General Permit (GP) number: WA
1c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
® Yes
❑ No
1d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
® 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non -404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ® Riparian Buffer Authorization
le. Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWQ 401
Certification:
❑ Yes ® No
For the record only for Corps Permit:
❑ Yes ® No
1f. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation
of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in -lieu
fee program.
❑ Yes
® No
1g. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h
below.
❑ Yes
® No
1 h. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
❑ Yes
® No
2. Project Information
2a. Name of project:
Powerhouse Church of Jesus Christ
2b. County:
Wake
2c. Nearest municipality / town:
Raleigh
2d. Subdivision name:
WA
2e. NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state
project no:
WA
3. Owner Information
3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed:
Powerhouse Church of Jesus Christ
3b. Deed Book and Page No.
D.B. 15471 Pg. 334
3c. Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable):
Ron Lucas
3d. Street address:
1130 North Blount Street
3e. City, state, zip:
Raleigh, NC 27611
3f. Telephone no.:
919 - 389 -2787
3g. Fax no.:
WA
3h. Email address:
WA
Page 1 of 14
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

4. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a. Applicant is:
❑ Agent ® Other, specify: Owner-please send correspondence to both owner
and agent.
4b. Name:
Ron Lucas
4c. Business name
(if applicable):
Powerhouse Church of Jesus Christ
4d. Street address:
1130 North Blount Street
4e. City, state, zip:
Raleigh, NC 27611
4f. Telephone no.:
919 - 389 -2787
4g. Fax no.:
N/A
4h. Email address:
N/A
5. Agent/Consultant Information (If applicable)
5a. Name:
Deborah Edwards Shirley
5b. Business name
(if applicable):
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
5c. Street address:
8412 Falls of Neuse Road, Suite 104
5d. City, state, zip:
Raleigh, NC 27615
5e. Telephone no.:
919 - 846 -5900
5f. Fax no.:
919 -846 -9467
5g. Email address:
DShirley @SandEC.com
Page 2 of 14

B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
la. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID):
Parcel ID: 1725 -15 -6935
1b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees):
Latitude: 35.8264 Longitude: - 78.5895
(DD.DDDDDD) (- DD.DDDDDD)
1c. Property size:
t 6.5 acres
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc.) to
UT to Beamon Lake (Marsh Creek) 27- 33 -20 -1
proposed project:
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water:
C; NSW
2c. River basin:
Neuse 03 -04-02; Hydrologic Unit Code 03020201
3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application: The existing conditions on site are wooded with a pond and concrete slab. The general land use in the
vicinity of the project is commercial and high density residential.
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
Approximately 0. 02 acres, Pond = approximately 0. 55 acres
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property:
Approximately 359 linear feet
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
The purpose of the proposed project is to provide access to the property.
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
The overall project consists of constructing a road to access lot. Development on the lot would include a 20,530 SF
building, parking, sidewalks, drive and stormwater BMP's. Equipment such as bull dozers, bucket loaders,
excavators and other typical equipment used for land disturbance and construction will be utilized for this project.
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
® Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
project (including all prior phases) in the past?
Comments:
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
of determination was made?
®Preliminary Final
Comments: S &EC will be requesting a signed JD under a
separate cover.
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Agency /Consultant Company: Soil & Environmental
Name (if known): Steven Ball
Consultants, PA Other:
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
Property was previously delineated by a different consultant. In 2011 and 2013 the streams and wetlands were re-
delineated by Steven Ball of S &EC. USACE site visit verifying jurisdictional areas conducted on July 19, 2011 and again
on October 25, 2013 with James Lastinger. The NCDWQ buffer determination letter confirming the Neuse River Riparian
Buffers was completed by a different consultant and is attached (DWQ Project #04- 2014).
5. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
® Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
In 2008, Nationwide Permit 29 and Water Quality Certification 3705 were requested. The 401 Approval was issued on
February 20, 2008 (see attached), the 404 Verification went statutory. The authorized Impacts were never constructed.
Page 3 of 14
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

B. Project Information and Prior Project History
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project? ❑ Yes ® No
6b. if yes, explain.
N/A
Page 4 of 14

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1 a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
❑ Wetlands ® Streams - tributaries ® Buffers
❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a.
2b.
2c.
2d.
2e.
2f.
Wetland impact number —
Type of jurisdiction
Permanent (P) or
Type of
Type of wetland
Forested
(Corps - 404, 10
Area of impact
Temporary T
impact
if known
DWQ — non -404, other
acres
W1 ❑ P [:IT
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W2 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W3 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W4 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W5 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
2g. Total wetland impacts
0
2h. Comments:
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a.
3b.
3c.
3d.
3e.
3f.
3g.
Stream impact number -
Type of
Stream name
Perennial
Type of jurisdiction
Average
Impact
Permanent (P) or
impact
(PER) or
(Corps - 404, 10
stream
length
Temporary (T)
intermittent
DWQ — non -404,
width
(linear
(INT)?
other)
(feet)
feet)
S1 ®P ❑ T
Road
UT to Beaman
❑ PER
® Corps
4
140
Crossing
Lake
® INT
❑ DWQ
S2 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S3 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S4 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts
140
3i. Comments:
Page 5 of 14
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individ ally list all open water im acts below.
4a.
4b.
4c.
4d.
4e.
Open water impact
Name of waterbody
number —
(if applicable)
Type of impact
Waterbody type
Area of impact (acres)
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
01 ❑P ❑T
02 ❑P ❑T
4f. Total open water impacts
4g. Comments:
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, then com lets the chart below.
5a.
5b.
5c.
5d.
5e.
Wetland Impacts (acres)
Stream Impacts (feet)
Upland
Pond ID
Proposed use or purpose of
(acres)
number
pond
Flood
ed
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
P1
P2
5f. Total
5g. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
Page 6 of 14

6. Buffer Impacts (for DWO)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a.
® Neuse ❑ Tar - Pamlico ❑ Other:
Project is in which protected basin?
❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman
6b.
6c.
6d.
6e.
6f.
6g.
Buffer impact
number —
Reason for impact
Buffer
Zone 1 Impact
Zone 2 impact
Permanent (P) or
Stream name
mitigation
(square feet)
(square feet)
Temporary T
required?
131 ®P ❑ T
Road Crossing
UT to Beamon
Lake
® Yes
6,929
3,959
B2 ❑P ❑T
El Yes
❑ No
B3 ❑P ❑T
❑Yes
❑ No
B4 ❑P ❑T
El Yes
❑ No
6h. Total buffer impacts
6,929
3,959
6i. Comments:
Page 7 of 14

D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
S &EC completed a wetland delineation and Neuse River Buffer evaluation for the entire property in order to identify
natural resources so that the project engineer could design a site plan that would minimize impacts to the maximum
extent practicable. The proposed project includes one impact area. The proposed impact includes 140 linear feet of
permanent stream impacts to an intermittent stream and associated riparian buffers. This road extension is being
required by the City of Raleigh. This extension would complete the connection of the Pine Knoll Drive which is a
collector road on the City's transportation plan. In addition, this extension would provide access to the property and
provide two points of ingress and egress in the event of an emergency.
Furthermore, the applicant is aware of the regional conditions associated with the Nationwide Permits 39. With
respect to commercial development conditions (NWP 39- Regional Conditions section 4.0) the applicant does not
anticipate any impacts to streams or wetlands associated with stormwater facilities, there are no impacts associated
with single - family recreation facilities, there are no permanent wetland or stream fills proposed within the
floodway/floodplain and the stream classification for this project is C, NSW (i.e. not Outstanding Resource Waters,
High Quality Waters, Coastal Wetlands or wetland adjacent to these waters).
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
Per the project engineer: Provide 2:1 side slopes on the road embankments for Pine Knoll Drive to minimize
impact to channel and buffer. Recess the 48" culvert to 8" below existing channel bottom elevation at both inverts to
promote conveyance of small aquatic life. All proposed on -site impervious, as well as a portion of off -site
impervious from the proposed Pine Knoll Drive, will be treated through a 90% TSS reduction wetpond, which also
detains stormwater and reduces nutrients.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
❑ Yes ® No
The proposed impacts to streams are below 150 linear
feet. As such, the applicant is not proposing
compensatory mitigation in the form of a mitigation
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
payment but by minimizing impacts. If however, after
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
review of this application the USACE/NCDWQ determines
compensatory mitigation is required in the form of a
payment, the applicant will utilize a private mitigation bank
or the Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP).
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
❑ DWQ ❑ Corps
❑ Mitigation bank
2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
❑Payment to in -lieu fee program
project?
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank:
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
Type
Quantity
Page 8 of 14
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

3c. Comments:
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached.
❑ Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested:
0 linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature:
❑ warm ❑ cool Elcold
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only):
0 square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
0 acres
4f. Non - riparian wetland mitigation requested:
0 acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested:
0 acres
4h. Comments:
S. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
buffer mitigation?
❑ Yes ® No
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
Zone
6c.
Reason for impact
6d.
Total impact
(square feet)
Multiplier
6e.
Required mitigation
(square feet)
Zone 1
3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2
1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund).
6h. Comments:
Page 9 of 14

E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified
® Yes ❑ No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
Comments: The Stormwater Management Plan device is designed to meet the City
❑ Yes ® No
of Raleigh and the D WQ's requirements will provide the necessary nutrient removal.
The Approved SMP will be submitted to the DWQ once received.
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project?
38%
2b. Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan?
® Yes ❑ No
2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why:
2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
The existing 278,620 SF (6.40 acre) project site is currently vacant, and is located at 3411 Pine Knoll Drive,
Raleigh, NC. A 20,530 SF church is proposed with associated parking, sidewalks and drive, totaling 100, 357 SF of
proposed impervious area. The project also includes the connection of a 41' b -b street section of Pine Knoll Drive,
including the addition of a 5 R wide concrete sidewalk. Initially, a portion of the site currently drains from to an
existing pond in the northwest corner of the property, and the rest of the site drains to the southwest corner of the
property. A wetpond is proposed to both detain the 2 and 107yr, 24 -hr design storms as well as reduce the nitrogen
export from the site. The wetpond also provides 90% TSS removal from the runoff associated with the project. The
wet and has a drainage area of 184,879 SF, of which 119,191 SF is impervious area.
® Certified Local Government
2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
❑ DWQ Stormwater Program
❑ DWQ 401 Unit
3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a. In which local government's jurisdiction is this project?
City of Raleigh
® Phase II
3b. Which of the following locally- implemented stormwater management programs
® NSW
❑ USMP
apply (check all that apply):
❑ Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other:
3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ® No
attached?
4. DWQ Stormwater Program Review
❑ Coastal counties
❑ HOW
4a. Which of the following state - implemented stormwater management programs apply
❑ ORW
(check all that apply):
❑ Session Law 2006 -246
❑ Other:
4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ❑ No
attached?
5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
Page 10 of 14
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
❑ Yes
❑ No
5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
❑ Yes
❑ No
Page 11 of 14

F. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal /statefiocal) funds or the
❑ Yes ® No
use of public (federal /state) land?
1b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State
❑ Yes ❑ No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1c. If you answered "yes' to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
❑ Yes ❑ No
letter.) Comments:
2. Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards,
❑ Yes ® No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 213 .0200)?
2b. Is this an after -the -fact permit application?
❑ Yes ® No
2c. If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
❑ Yes ® No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b. If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
We have reviewed the "Draft Internal Policy, Cumulative impacts and the 401 Water Quality Certification and
Isolated Wetlands Programs" document prepared by the NC Division of Water Quality on April 10, 2004, version
2.1. The draft states that many private developments are unlikely to cause cumulative impacts, including projects
such as urban in -fill, most residential subdivisions and small commercial developments as well as agricultural and
silvicultural operations. The Powerhouse Church of Jesus Christ project will be a small scale development.
Additionally, the project is located within the City of Raleigh's jurisdiction, therefore the adjacent properties that
have potential for development will have the following regulations to protect downstream waters: 1) the Phase 11
NPDES Stormwater Permit Program, this program includes permitting requirements for Municipal Separate Storm
Sewer Systems (MS4s) in addition to post - construction stormwater management requirements, and 2) the Neuse
River Basin Riparian Buffer Protection regulations, these regulations require limited development within the riparian
buffer area in addition to "diffuse flow" requirements at a minimum and could require Best Management Practices
that control nitrogen if diffuse flow cannot be achieved. We anticipate that the DWQ will advise us if any additional
information is needed.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non -discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility. This property will be connected to the City of Raleigh's
Sewer System. The City will ensure that capacity of their treatment facility will not be exceeded.
Page 12 of 14
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
® Yes ❑ No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
❑ Yes ® No
impacts?
❑ Raleigh
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
❑ Asheville
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat? The NC- Natural Heritage Programs Data Search was used to search for elemental occurrences of federally protected
species listed within the Raleigh East Topographic Quadrangle map. It was determined based on the search that there are six
elemental occurrences that are listed within the Raleigh East Quad map. Two of the six are listed as Federally Endangered or
Threatened. See table below.
tate Federal
Scient#ic Common Topo Map
'Habitat Commetatus
[rot
Name Name Status Potion
� S
Alasmidonta Dwarf Historical E E Tar and Neuse drainages, mainly near Fall Line
heterodon Wedgemussel
Fusconaia most Atlantic drainages, in lower Piedmont and
Atlantic Pigtoe Historical E FSC upper Coastal Plain; also in Black River in
masoni
lower Coastal Plain
Lasmigona Tar, Neuse, Roanoke, and Yadkin/Pee Dee
subviddis Green Floater Current E FSC systems downstate; New and Watauga
systems in mountains
Myotis Northern Myotis Historical SR PE roosts in hollow trees and buildings (warmer
septentrionalis months), in caves and mines (winter)
Noturus furiosus Carolina Historical T FSC Tar and Neuse drainages (endemic to North
Madtom Carolina)
Rhus michauxii Michawes Current E E sandhills, sandy forests, woodland, woodland
Sumac edges
References. North Carolina Natural Heritage Program Online Database Search [November 1, 2013] DENR, Office of Conservation,
Planning, and Community Affairs, Raleigh, NC.
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat?
❑ Yes ® No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat? The NOAH Habitat
Conservation/Habitat Protection: National Marine Fish Service; Essential Fish Habitat Mapper website was referenced.
No Essential Fish Habitat was identified near the project.
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
❑ Yes ® No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
Records checks at the State Historic Preservation Office or the Office of State Archeology were not performed. No
structures were observed during the wetland evaluation.
Page 13 of 14

S. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA- designated 100 -year floodplain?
❑ Yes ® No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements: N/A
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? NC Floodplain Mapping Program & project engineer
November 7,
Deborah E. Shirley
2013
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name
Applicant/Agen s Signature
Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter frorpe applicant
is provided.)
Page 14 of 14

ioi1 & Environmental Consultants, PA
8i1? Falls of \eurr Road, Cuilr 1111, RnleipJ�, \!: 37G 13. 1'honr. (hNfj it•1(�59(iU • 1'.tx: (91'1} A- K••91rs7
AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM
All Blanks To Be Filled In By The Current Landowner
Nam a Powerhouse Church of Jesus Christ
Address: 110 North Blount Street
Bel gh. NC 27611
Phone: _91q -'igq -7787
Project Namer' Desaiption: Powerhouse Church of Jesus Chri EC Project #__ vl )
Date; 11/4/13
The Department of the Army
US Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District
P.O. Box 1890
Wilmington, NC 28402
Attn: 1 {'.,Mnn C Cpl S 1 V1< -F �i Field —L�Ll l C I..
Re: Wetlands Related Consulting and Permitting .
To Whom It May Concern:
I, the current rD operty owner. hereby des ignateand authorize Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA to
act In my behalf as my agent In the processing of permit applications, to furnish upon request
supplemental Information in support of applications, etc. from thisday forward. The 4th day of
This notification supersedes any previous correspondenoe conoerning the agent for this project.
NOTICE: This authorization, for liability and professional courtesy reasons, lsvalld only for
government off Idalsto enter the property when a000mpanled by S& EC staff. You should call S&EC
to arrange a site meeting prior to visiting the site
Rnn Taira¢
Print Property Owners Name Property OwnertsSignature
CC: Ms. Karen Higgins oc: Ms. Deborah EdwardsShirley
NCDENR —DWR Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
512 N. Sal €sbury St.
Raleigh, N C 27804

• • " 11 s9sn m3 tomaiem . 1 1
r r • . r.
' • • 0069-902 (6 W
111
deW op4dejBodo.L
000,17 111 111
PV
kL
/iii ■. �r�� Mal
lowl
IWA
f

A6
A,. ,
644L
vfilm.j�r

pills
I
�ti' t
�yfs,-' J I t ,mow `..!✓ '. �
yyet�. � �. J :., � "F � '^ � t —^ r �n X`� t ''C � r_•.
CS Q: t f'Lt

JLJN-d*tJ-eUd5 11:02 FROM:DWO- WETLANDS 9197336893
70:98469467 P:3/3
Habitat for Humanity of Wake County, Inc.
Page 2 of 2
December 17, 2004
"A" - I determin that a pond and stream exists in'thd location of surface water "A" that
are subject to the euse Buffer Rule. The pond and stream and their associated buffers
should be identifi on any future plans for this property.
'13" - I determine that an ephemeral (stormwater) stream exists in the approximate
location of surf water "B" that is exempt (,_not subject) from the Neuse Buffer Rule.
The owner (or future ow*s) should notify the DWQ (and other relevant agencies) of this
decision in any future c "pondences concerning this property. This determination only
applies to the surface wat rs located on the subject property. Surface waters subject to the buffer
rules may exist within th same drainage ways beyond the property boundaries. This on -site
determination shall ex pi five (5) years-from the data of this letter.
I.andowners or affected pes that dispute a determination made by the DWQ or Delegated
Local Authority that a surface water exists and that it is subject to the buffer rule may request a
determination by the Dire tor. A request for a determination by the Director shall be referred to
the Director in writing4c Cpdi Earoiy, DWQ WctlandsMl Unit, 2321 Crabtree Blvd.,
Raleigh. NC 27604 -2260. Individbals that dispute a determination by the DWQ or Delegated
Local Authority that "exe pts" a surface water from thkbuffer rule may ask for an adjudieatory
hearing. You must act wi�hin 60 days of the date that yo receive this letter. Applicants are
hereby notified that the 6 day statutory appeal time dt, s �oiotstartt until the affected party
(including downstream adjacent landowners) is notify f this decision. DWQ recommends
that the applicant conduct this notification in order to be eeitain that third party appeals are made
in a timely manner. To k for a hearing, send a written petition, which conforms to Chapter
150B of the North Caroli General Statutes to the Office of Administrative Hearings. 6714 Mail
Service Center, Raleigh, .C. 27699 -6714. This*deternninstion is final and binding unless you
ask for a hearing within days.
This letter only addresses �he applicability to the buffer rules and does not approve any activity
within the buffers. Nord this letter approve any activity within Waters of the United States
or Waters of the State. If rou have any additional questions or require additional information
Please call me at [phone].
Sincerely,
Bob 7arcecki,
IDWQ, Wetlands 1401 Unit
cc: Laura Lombardo, I TOU Water Quality Group, Box 7637, Raleigh, NC 27695 -7637
Bill Brower, City c f Raleigh, Inspections Dept., 222 W. Hargett St., Raleigh, NC 27602
Sean Clark, S&EC Inc., 11010 Raven Ridge Rd., Raleigh, NC 27614
Mike Horan, DW Raleigh Regional Office
File Copy I
Central Files
Filename: 042014

O�O� WAjF9 ©G
c C
>_ y
Habitat for Humanity of Wake County
Attn: Mr. John L. Cramer
2420 Raleigh Blvd.
Raleigh, NC 27604
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
February 20, 2008
Subject Property: Capital Pines
UT to Beamon Lake (030402,27-33-20- 1, C, NSW)
Coleen H. Sullins, Director
Division of Water Quality
DWQ EXP No. 0 8-0213
Wake County
FEB 2 2 2008 ; #'
f Oy:1ai� ii c anr,_:d °! C. ^ „wi�llnnis, PA !
Approval of 401 Water Quality Certification and Authorization Certification per the Neuse River
Buffer Protection Rules (15A NCAC 2B.0233) with Additional Conditions
Dear Nft. Cramer:
You have our approval, in accordance with the attached conditions and those listed below, to place fill
within or otherwise impact 146 linear feet of intermittent stream, 7,080 f of Zone 1 and 3,967 ft of Zone
2 of the protected riparian buffers for the purpose of constructing the proposed subdivision, as described
within your Pre- construction Notification Application dated February 18, 2008. The impacts are covered
by: General Water Quality Certification Number 3705 (GC3705). General Certification 3705 allows you
to use Nationwide Permit NW29 when issued by the US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE). In
addition, you should obtain or otherwise comply with any other required federal, state or local permits
before you go ahead with your project including (but not limited to) Erosion and Sediment Control, and
Non - discharge regulations. Also, this approval to proceed with your proposed impacts or to conduct
impacts to waters as depicted in your application shall expire upon expiration of the 404 Permit.
This approval is for the purpose and design that you described in your PCN application (February 18,
2008). If you change your project, you must notify us and you may be required to send us a new
application. If total fills for this project (now or in the future) exceed one acre of wetland or 150 linear
feet of stream, compensatory mitigation may be required as described in 15A NCAC 211.0506 (h). This
approval requires you to follow the conditions listed in the attached Water Quality Certification
(GC 3705) and any additional conditions listed below.
401 Oversight/Express Review Permitting UnitQjlll>!!l[(�
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699 -1650
2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Phone: [phone] / FAX 919 - 733 -6893 / Internet: hip:/ /h2o.enr.state.nc.ush►cwetlands
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer — 50% Recycled/l MA Post Consumer Paper

Habitat for Humanity of Wake County
EXP 08 -0213
Page 2 of S
February 20, 2008
The Additional Conditions of the Certification are:
1. Impacts Approved
The following impacts are hereby approved as long as all of the other specific and general
conditions of this Certification (and Isolated Wetland Permit) are met. No other impacts are
approved including incidental impacts:
Impact Type
Amount A roved its
Plan Location or Reference
Stream intermittent
146 linear feet
February 18 2008 PCN Me 4
Riparian buffer Zone 1
7,080(s uare feet
February 18, 2008 PCN Me 7
Riparian buffer Zone 2
3,967 (square feet
February 18 2008 PCN page 7
2. No Waste, Spoil, Solids, or Fill of Any Kind
No waste, spoil, solids, or fill of any kind shall occur in wetlands, waters, or riparian areas beyond
the footprint of the impacts depicted in the Pre- Construction Notification and authorized by this
approval letter. All construction activities, including the design, installation, operation, and
maintenance of sediment and erosion control Best Management Practices, shall be performed so
that no violations of state water quality standards, statutes, or rules occur.
3. Erosion and sediment control practices must be in full compliance with all specifications governing
the proper design, installation and operation and maintenance of such Best Management Practices in
order to protect surface waters standards:
a. The design, installation; operation, and maintenance of the sediment and erosion control
measures must be such that they equal, or exceed, the requirements specified in the most
recent version of the North Carolina Sediment and Erosion Control Manual. The devices
shall be maintained on all construction sites, borrow sites, and waste pile (spoil) projects,
including contractor -owned or leased borrow pits associated with the project.
b. Sufficient materials required for stabilization and/or repair of erosion control measures and
stormwater routing and treatment shall be on site at all times.
4. Construction Stonmwater Permit NCGO10000
Upon the approval of an Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan issued by the Division of Land
Resources (DLR) or a DLR delegated local erosion and sedimentation control program, an
NPDES General stormwater permit (NCGO10000) administered by DWQ is automatically issued
to the project. This General Permit allows stormwater to be discharged during land disturbing
construction activities as stipulated by conditions in the permit. If your project is covered by this
permit [applicable to construction projects that disturb one (1) or more acres], full compliance
with permit conditions including the sedimentation control plan, self - monitoring, record keeping
and reporting requirements are required. A copy of this permit and monitoring report forms may
be found at http: / /h2 o.ennstate.nc.us/su/Forms Documents.htm.
5. Sediment and Erosion Control Measures
Sediment and erosion control measures shall not be placed in wetlands or waters without prior
written approval by DWQ. If placement of sediment and erosion control devices in wetlands and
waters is unavoidable, then design and placement of temporary erosion control measures shall not
be conducted in a manner that may result in dis- equilibrium of wetlands or stream beds or banks,
adjacent to or upstream and down stream of the above structures. All devices shall be removed and
the natural grade restored within two (2) months of the date that the Division of Land Resources has
released the project.

Habitat for Humanity of Wake County
EXP 08 -0213
Page 3 of 5
February 20, 2008
6. Stormwater Management Plan and Diffuse Flow Provisions
One (1) copy of the City of Raleigh approved Stormwater Management Plan (Febraary 14,
2008) for this project must be submitted to this office before any impacts authorized by this
certification may occur.
All stormwater shall be directed as diffuse flow at non - erosive velocities through the protected
stream buffers and will not re- concgntmte before discharging into the stream as identified within
15A NCAC 2B.0233(5)
If diffuse flow as per 15A NCAC 02B .0233(5) has not been achieved, then the DWQ shall be
notified and corrective actions to restore diffuse flow shall be taken if necessary to impede the
formation of erosion gullies. At no time shall stormwater from the proposed development be
piped directly through the buffer without prior written authorization by DWQ.
The structural stormwater practices as approved by the City of Raleigh, as well as drainage
patterns, must be maintained in perpetuity. No changes to the structural stormwater practices
shall be made without written authorization from the Division of Water Quality. Stormwater
easements shall be recorded for a distance of at least 10 feet on each side of all stormwater
conveyances, and on all lots containing these structures including future access for maintenance.
The stormwater easements shall allow for the ability to maintain the structures, perform
corrective actions as described above and shall provide protection of the structures from potential
alternations by fixture property owners.
7. Work in the Dry
All work in or adjacent to stream waters shall be conducted in a dry work area. Approved best
management practices from the most current version of the NC Sediment and Erosion Control
Manual, or the NCDOT Construction and Maintenance Activities Manual, such as sandbags, rock
berms, cofferdams, and other diversion structures shall be used to minimize excavation in flowing
water.
8. If concrete is used during the construction, then a dry work area should be maintained to prevent
direct contact prevent direct contact between curing concrete and stream water. Water that
inadvertently contacts uncured concrete should not be discharged to surface waters due to the
potential for elevated pH and possible aquatic life/fish kills.
9. Culvert Installation
Culverts required for this project shall be installed in such a manner that the original stream profiles
are not altered. Existing stream dimensions (including the cross section dimensions, pattern, and
longitudinal profile) must be maintained above and below locations of each culvert. Culverts shall
be designed and installed to allow for aquatic life movement as well as to prevent head cutting of
the streams. If any of the existing pipes are or become perched, the appropriate stream grade shall
be re- established or, if the pipes installed in a perched manner, the pipes shall be removed and re-
installed correctly.
Culvert(s) shall not be installed in such a manner that will cause aggradation or erosion of the
stream up or down stream of the culvert(s). Installation of culverts in wetlands must ensure
continuity of water movement and be designed to adequately accommodate high water or flood
conditions. Existing stream dimensions (including the cross section dimensions, pattern and
longitudinal profile) shall be maintained above and below locations of each culvert. Placement of
culverts and other structures in waters, streams, and wetlands must be placed below the elevation of
the str+eambed by one foot for all culverts with a diameter greater than 48 inches, and 20 percent of

Habitat for Humanity of Wake County
EXP 08 -0213
Page 4 of 5
February 20, 2008
the culvert diameter for culverts having a diameter less than 48 inches, to allow low flow passage of
water and aquatic life. The applicant is required to provide evidence that the equilibrium shall be
maintained- if requested in writing by DWQ.
The establishment of native, woody vegetation and other soft stream bank stabilization techniques
must be used where practicable instead of riprap or other bank hardening methods. If ripmp is
necessary, it shall not be placed in the streambed, unless specifically approved by the Division of
Water Quality.
10. Certificate of Completion
Upon completion of all work approved within the 401 Water Quality Certification or applicable
Buffer Rules, and any subsequent modifications, the applicant is required to return the attached
certificate of completion to the 401 Oversight/Express Review Permitting Unit, North Carolina
Division of Water Quality, 1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC, 27699 -1650.
11. Protective Fencing
The outside buffer, wetland or water boundary and along the construction corridor within these
boundaries approved under this authorization shall be clearly marked with orange warning fencing
(or similar high visibility material) for the areas that have been approved to infringe within the
buffer, wetland or water prior to any land disturbing activities to ensure compliance with 15A
NCAC 2B.0233 and GC 3705.
12. Deed Notifications
Deed notifications or similar mechanisms shall be placed on all retained jurisdictional wetlands,
waters and riparian buffers in order to assure compliance for future wetland, water and riparian
buffer impact. These mechanisms shall be put in place prior to impacting any wetlands and/or
waters approved for impact under this Certification Approval.
13. Notification of Construction
The applicant and/or authorized agent shall contact the DWQ Express Review Program in writing
at the letterhead address within ten (10) days of the commencement of construction.
The applicant/permittee and their authorized agents shall conduct all activities in a manner consistent with
State water quality standards (including any requirements resulting from compliance with §303(d) of the
Clean Water Act), and any other appropriate requirements of State and Federal Law. If the Division
,determines that such standards or laws are not being met, including failure to sustain a- designated or
achieved use, or that State or Federal law is being violated, or that further conditions are necessary to
assure compliance, then the Division may reevaluate and modify this General Water Quality Certification.
Violations of any condition herein set forth may result in revocation of this Certification and may result in
criminal and/or civil penalties. The authorization to proceed with your proposed impacts or to conduct
impacts to waters as depicted in your application and as authorized by this Certification, shall expire upon
expiration of the 404 or CAMA Permit.
If you do not accept any of the conditions of this Certification (associated with the approved wetland or
stream impacts), you may ask for an adjudicatory hearing. You must act within 60 days of the date that
you receive this letter. To ask for a hearing, send a written petition, which conforms to Chapter 150B of
the North Carolina General Statutes to the Office of Administrative Hearings, 6714 Mail Service Center,
Raleigh, N.C. 27699 -6714. This certification and its conditions are final and binding unless you ask for a
hearing.

Habitat for Humanity of Wake County
EXP 08 -0213
Page 5 of 5
February 20, 2008
Any disputes over determinations regarding this Authorization Certificate (associated with the approved
buffer impacts) shall be referred in writing to the Director for a decision. The Director's decision is
subject to review as provided in Articles 3 and 4 of G.S. 150B.
This letter completes the review of the Division of Water Quality under Section 401 of the Clean Water
Act and the Neuse River riparian buffer protection rule -as described within 15A NCAC 2B .0233. If you
have any questions, please telephone Lia Myott or Joseph Gyamfi at 919 - 733 -1786.
Sincerely,
oleen H. Sullins
CHSIcbkllem
cc: James Shern, USACE Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
Lauren Witherspoon, DWQ Raleigh Regional Office
File Copy
Central Files
Debbie Edwards, Soil & Environmental Cons., PA, 11010 Raven Ridge Rd, Raleigh, NC 27614
File: 080213CapitalPines (Wah)EXP+401 +MRAuth

Environmental Consultants, PA
Road • Raleigh, N"- Carolina 27614 • Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
viww.SandEC.corn
April 7, 2008
S &EC Project # 9715.W2
US Army Corps of Engineers
Attn: Jamie Shern , -
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, NC 27587
RE: Notification of,Statutory Status'of Request for NWP #29,
Capital Pines'
Raleigh, Wake County, North Carolina
Dear Mr. Shern:
On February 19, 2008, S &EC requested authorization-from the US Army- Corps
of Engineers ( USACE). to utilize Nationwide'Permit (NWP) 29 to provide at%rdable
housing within Wake County. T he, proposed- impact to a jurisdictional streain is being
required,by the City of- Raleigh,in order;to.provide the necessary access to the property:
Proposed permanent impacts include 146 -linear feet of intermittent stream channel and no
wetland impacts. At this time, 48 days have lapsed since the-US Army Corps of
Engineei,'s receipt of the complete preconstruction notification. To paraphrase the
Federal Register (Vol. 67, No: •10, section• 13:a.1), the pelmittee may begin ,the proposed
work if the USACE has not -sent any written'imdtices (i.e. the'permit itself ovany notice of
an incomplete submittal, etc.) within 45 days of the District or Division Office of the
USACE receiving the complete:permit application therefore, according to the
aforementioned regulation the client may proceed with the proposed' activity as depicted
in the submitted permit application and in compliance with the NC- Division of Water
Quality'. s 401 - Appr6val.
Sincerely, S
Debbie Edwards
Environmental Specialist
cc: Mr. Travis Crissmann (BNK, Inc.)
Mr. John L. Cramer (Habitat for Humanity of Wake County)
Attachments
1. Copy of NWP General Conditions, Section 13
2. Copy of USACE signed receipt of the completed PCN application
Charlotte office: Greensboro office:
236 LePhillip Court, Suite C 3817 -E Lawndale Drive
Concord, NC 28025 Greensboro, NC 27455
Phone: [phone] Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone] Fax: [phone]

2090 Federal RegisterlVol. 67, No. 30 /Tuesd
ay, January 15, 2002 /Notices
mana em t
g en requirements). Another
Important component of water quality
management is the establishment and
maintenance of vegetated buffers next to
open waters, including streams (refer to
General Condition 19 for vegetated
buffer requirements for the NWPsj.
This condition is only applicable to
Projects that have the potential to affect
water quality. While appropriate
measures must be taken, in most cam
it is not necessary to conduct detailed
studies to Identify such measures or to
require monitoring.
10. coastal Zone Management. in
certain stales, an individual state coastal
zone management consistency
concurrence must be obtained or waived
(see Section 330.4(4))•
31. Bhdangered Species. (a) No
activity is authorised under any NWp
which Is likely to jeopardize the
continued existence of a threatened at
endangered species or a species
Proposed for such designation. as
Identified under the Federal Endangered
Species Act (ESA). or which will
destroy or advarsely modify the critical
habitat of such spades. Non - federal
petmittees 211011 notify the District
Engineer if any listed species or
designated critical habitat might be
affected or is In the vicinity of the
Project, or is located In the designated
critical habitat and shall not begin work
on the activity until notified by the
of
District the
have been satisfied that
the activity is authorized. For activities
chat may affect Federally- listed
endangered or threatened species or
designated critical habitat, the
noti fication must include the name(s) of
the endangered or threatened spades
that may be affected by the proposed
work or that utilize the designated
critical habitat that may be affected by
the proposed work As a result of formal
or informal oon2ultation with the FWS
or NMFS the DisUrid Bngine�r may add
spode$ - specific regi=eUndan"ed
Species conditions to the NWPi
(b) Authorization of an activity by a
NWP does not authorize the 'take" of a
threatened or endangered spades as
defined under the ESA. In the absence
of separate authorization (e g.. an ESA
Section 10 Permit. a Biological Opinion
with "incidental take" provisions, etc.)
from the USFWS or the NMFS, both
lethal and non - lethal "takes -- of
Protected species are in violation of the
ESA. Information on the location of
threatened and endangered species and
their critical habitat can be obtained
directly from the offices of the USFWS
and NMFS or their world wide web
pages at httX11www.fws,gov/rgendspp1
endspp.html and http#www.nfmsgovl
pmt-reslesohome html respectively.
12. Historic properties. No activity
Which may affect historic properties
listed, or eligible for listing, in the
National Register of Historic Places is
authorized. until the District Engineer
has complied with the provisions of 33
CFR part 325, Appendix C, The
�P Ve permittee must notify the
i y may affect any historic
actiivvit
Properties listed, determined to be
eligible, or which the prospective
Petmittee has reason to believe may be
eligible for listing on the National •
Register of Historic Planes. and shall ant
begin the-activity until notified by the
District Engineer that the requirements
of the National Histotc Preservation Act
have been satisfied and that the activity
'U authorized, information on the
location and existence ofbistoric
resources can be obtained from the State
Historic preservation Off m and the
National Register of Historic Places (see
33 CFR 330.4(g)). For activities that may
affect historic properties listed in. or
eligible for lis$ag In, the National the
nnotifcation Mud state which historic
Property tray be affected by the
Proposed work or include a vicinity
map indicating the location of the
historic property.
13. WNotlfication.
(a) riming: where required by the
terms of the NWP. the prospective
n�ee must notify &a District
with a precoaetnrction
The District (PCN1 as � as possible.
the notification �mmli>� within 30 if
days of the date of receipt and can
request additional fniormatfon
necessary to make the PCN complete
only once. However, if the prospective
Pecmittee does not provI& all of the
requested informationt)ien the District
Engineer will notify the prospective
penuittee that the notification is still
incomplete and the PM review process
will not commence unto all of the
requested Information has been received
by the District Engineer, bl�e
prospective ttee g -Ennot begip
ea
1 ) VR_6FnOtiflad in writing by the
District Engineer that the activity may
proceed under the NWP with any
Special conditions imposed by the
District or Division Eneinew.. or
(2) If notified in wnhng by the District
or Division Engineer that an Individual
Permit is required; or
A (3) Unless 45 da have passed from
the District Engineer's receipt of the
complete notification and the
Prospective permittee has not received
written notice from the District or
Division Engineer. Subsequently, the
permittee's right to proceed under the
NWP may be modified, suspended, or
revoked only in accordance with the
procedure set forth in 33 CFR
330.5(dx2).
(b) Contents of Notification ; The
notification must be in writing and
include the following information;
(1) Name, address and telephone
numbers of the prospective permittee;
(2) Location of the proposed project;
(3) Brief description of the proposed
project; the project's purpose; direct and
indiredadverse environmental effects
the project would cause; any other
NWP(s). Regional General Parmit(s), or
Individual Permits) used at intended to
be used to authorize any part of the
Proposed or any related activity.
Sketches s be provided when
necessary to show that the activity
complies with the terms of the NWP
(Sketches usually clarity lie project and
when provided result in &Tamer
decision.);
(4) For NWPs 7.12,14,18, 21.34.38,
39,41.42. and 43, the PM must also
include a delineation of affected special
aquatic 'sites. including wetlands,
vegetated shallows (a.&. submerged
aaqquuaatic vegetation, seagrou beds), and
ritila and pool complexes (see paragraph
130;
(5) For NWP 7 (Outfall Structures and
Maintenance). the PCN must include
information regarding the original
design capacities and canBgurabons of
those areas of the facility where
maintenance dredging or excavation is
pied;
(6) For NWP 14 (linear
Transportation Owsings), the PCH
must include a compensatory mitigation
proposal to offset permanent losses of
waters of the US and a statement
describing how temporary losses of
waters of the US will be minimized to
the maximum extent predicable;
(7) For NWP 21 (Surface Coal Mining
Activities), the PCN must include an
Office of Surface Mining (OSM) or state -
approved mitigation plan, if applicable.
To be authorized by this IdWP. the
District Engineer must determine that
the activity complies with the terms and
conditions of the NWP and that the
adverse environmental effects are
minimal both individually and
cumulatively and must notify the
project sponsor of this determination in
writing;
(8) For NWP 27 (Stream and Wetland
Restoration), the PCN must include
documentation of the prior condition of
the site that will be reverted by the
permittee;
07

11742 ---- ...__..._. ............. . � VAN 0
(F� ___w__ -- --
AST lA E. TOLL FREE 866-727', a
SAME DAY
RALEIGH, NC 99.9.828.0303
BY SPM t
PIOKUP DATE . ���kq PICKUP TIME `
ESL, DRRIER # OF PIECES I WEIGHT
ABCE?(PRE&SCOURIFRS COM , MILEAGE DARED VALUE IF OVER $60.00
BILL 70 t A PPER ECENER 30 PAM
FROM TO
COMPANY NAME COMPANY NAME Ll. I .1.
STREET ADDRESS STREET ADDRESS„ i 14 11 .4,-
CITY ST ZIP CRY wAltd 61yJ 8T &IZIP A7m
PROJECT NAME CONTACT NAME C k#,wr,. Ae.-, %
PHONED - PHONE q y5---i4.4lb
SIGNATURE J DELIVERY DATE D- DELIVERY TIME
y 7/
$= Of" 9®IfIAOA000MR10554FOOMACr oxeeW=

mnmso;.q wfflm a. w ..*— s .amnoa1samgM-b.wa.,»..
—6—
AN
$fib 1 Ali EyYA t�t� Iy �
,t
8Rg1 01 ,\ ,�� ,
I --
o�m�i
pt
A:$
aBVg�f I//
o�7 1
to�gil \
a
f
O�
Q=
o
mA
a
�g
4.
�l $
zj
I-A
r A ;,R31
Ot
aaLZ l \
FDA
a Q R � eg I
yp�A�ga Rj1 I
/ I
14ti1Y°'r !D°?7 'I a
Sig �tr p$8og � iRN •�FA� •/ � i —' L �= `_ �` ��� \` ` �r ¢°'� ��i �� �1 � �y
-_
N
fit-
-oil Nil YX �
gr"
I�
I \ I
n
e
*N
0.
0
e o�
n
.� 111111III I11II111111111111 .111111111 III
� � �iRR�7��RR8���IRB €elSSii�bgp$�84496�R91R�b g
g 8
M
n
Z
8
0
CO
V,
W
SHM
C1.0
2 OF 20
POWERHOUSE
®CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST
3411 PINE KNOLL DRIVE
CITY OP RALEIGH, WAKE COWM, NONIN CAROLINA
M12"so 00-2&13 RAs
BASS, NIXON & KENNEDY, INC.
CONSULTING ENC;INEERS
TELL M44n OR OM =M �X �
CERTIflQATOfN I W8ER87 N06E (C-01' 10);FNCM A (C-0Mn
©©
.IOBNO. Dare DRAYIN9Y
©aSnNGCONDITIONS
AND DEMOLITION PLAN
,
,,,,.,s
PERC.OBCommo 6
goo ns
P COYMENTB
�
SCALL T . 40 CM W DLM
REYI&ONB
NOT RELEASED FOR CONSTRUCTION OR BID SOLICITATION

I! 1> m,. 0�.l. I, f/• 000Y.. i.. u, 1. 1.. 01N.• 11101w110. Irb�etlNh ,ll�Op.....i.11..,07!/!m,>t „OM....1..., OmY..°
Q_I I
Jill
VU All
01-
TR
1 3— E�1 �P�3 \ T • \ q'�•�
� I I ` ::iii 8a� 6 �Y1� R �� .. •1 7��j, (yyq( \ 1 I
yy I , Sp
Nos )s I I
G c
( 232••' 1 A • • . I I Y
C
4 I I Y
_ 2Q
4PW3' I I rZ �jJ g t l FIQ CE
1 �
' 3Y
is A
It
ap1 „_4
°,•SP $ 1.!77'13 -IY IJ2W 9 S IJW'12-M 01717 y '�- T Q +11 • $`•• — — — — — 'Y 'J
Y�l N yyy 4 ii
a A 4A
q i$ Pi yy�P °yC
VIP I � �— Q � � '1 1 I ' 1 IRE , • - 6 I I �� �'+RP•`YJ��
4
y� 1:11:1 El El
gg i i i I Tl�2L 13' • l3 21' 13' 13' Z• le' IV 2a'
ios� y}}1 I -
� ° 1 1 1 1 I 1 `may • ® ® ® � � 77 a7
q
g[{� Q I
5Y-' ?I
IFFTX11 11® ® 1 - -- _ 1
J
J —ILL I I - 1 I 1 _
----------- - -- - - -- — -
_ -- ------ - - - - --
p R qu° a —� ) —
�v
�$ • I o gill pgy-'i , R4 o
m
z�I ;zir
Dig Mo F = y
❑ II ors
n
MAO Q 3� $
o O Rg
�� R
m
G1 O
�_ = z e a
�.' °
cup 000
° s
91 0
-n �� >I Asa g� z §
NA P Y
ni a 4
l��� S4i 8
__ �.
Qa > 6i>g � S £P Ps g k
IT! F 1 asaa - - ay faa a
$ 0 9a t�j N w
Z
O M12130 062 &,3 MB
y SHEET POWERHOUSE aoeNO. DATE omvm BASS, NIXON & KENNEDY, INC.
CONSULTING ENGINEERS
(��•� =CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST SITE PLAN 2 ,62,.,3 PER COncCUMENM MOCH14M HILL �SUMI25%RMEIGKNC27M �
4► 3411 PINE KNOLL DRIVE + +oo, -,a Penaoac4 D TRM0NE
3 OF 20 urr or nA+aw,, wave eouHrr, rronn, ea,aw,u sca e r ° •o aac er ow No. DATE oe3aemaoN Nn ��a �•PAx ��
W CEiNi1RCAT10N NUINSERS: NCOMS 1 NCBOW
NOT RELEASED FOR CONSTRUCTION OR SID SOLICITATION