20211637 Ver 1_401 Application_20211108

Staff Review
Does this application have all the attachments needed to accept it into the review process?*
Yes No
ID# *
20211637
Version* 1
Is this project a public transportation project?* Yes
• No
Reviewer List: * Sue Homewood:eads\slhomewood
Select Reviewing Office: * Winston-Salem Regional Office - [phone]
Submittal Type:* 401 Application
Does this project require a request for payment to be sent?*
Yes
No
How much is owed?* $240.00
$570.00

Project Submittal Form
Please note: fields marked with a red asterisk below are required. You will not be able to submit the form until all
mandatory questions are answered.
Project Type: * For the Record Only (Courtesy Copy)
New Project
Modification/New Project with Existing ID
More Information Response
Other Agency Comments
Pre -Application Submittal
Re-Issuance\Renewal Request
Stream or Buffer Appeal
Project Contact Information
Name: Heather LaGamba
Who is submitting the information?
Email Address: [e-mail]
Project Information
Project Name: Clevon Woods WWTP
Is this a public transportation project?
Yes
No
Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
Yes No Unknown
County (ies)
Watauga
Please upload all files that need to be submited.
Click the upload button or drag and drop files here to attach document
Pilot Project 7372_Clevon Woods WWTP_PCN
8.14MB
Application_11.8.2021.pdf
Only pdf or kmz files are accepted.
Describe the attachments or
comments:
PCN for 401 WQC
Sign and Submit
By checking the box and signing box below, I certify that:
• I, the project proponent, hereby certifies that all information contained herein is true, accurate, and complete to the
best of my knowledge and belief.
• I, the project proponent, hereby requests that the certifying authority review and take action on this CWA 401
certification request within the applicable reasonable period of time.

• I agree that submission of this online form is a "transaction" subject to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General
Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act');
• I agree to conduct this transaction by electronic means pursuant to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General
Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act');
• I understand that an electronic signature has the same legal effect and can be enforced in the same way as a
written signature; AND
• I intend to electronically sign and submit the online form.
Signature:
Submittal Date: Is filled in automatically.

Preliminary ORM Data Entry Fields for New Actions
ACTION ID 9: SAW- Begin Date (Date Received): 11.8.2021
Prepare file folder ❑ Assign Action ID Number in ORM ❑
1. Project Name [PCN Form A2a]: Clevon Woods WWTP
2. Work Type: ❑✓ Private ❑Institutional ❑Government ❑ Commercial
3. Project Description / Purpose [PCN Form B3d and B3e]:
The site is proposed for development with a wastewater treatment plant.
4. Property Owner/ Applicant [PCN Form A3 orA4]: Williams General Contracting, Inc.
5. Agent / Consultant [PNC Form A5 — or ORM Consultant ID Number]:
Pilot Environmental, Inc.
6. Related Action ID Number(s) [PCN Form 135b]: Unknown
7. Project Location —Coordinates, Street Address, and/or Location Description [PCN Form Blb]:
Aldridge Road
36.1467560,-81.7918260
8. Project Location —Tax Parcel ID [PCN Form Bla]: 1678-53-7991-000
9. Project Location — County [PCN Form A2b]: Watauga
10. Project Location — Nearest Municipality or Town [PCN Form A2c]: Foscoe
11. Project Information — Nearest Waterbody [PCN Form 132a]: Watauga River
12. Watershed / 8-Digit Hydrologic Unit Code [PCN Form 132c]: 06010103
Authorization: Section 10 ❑ Section 404 ✓❑
Regulatory Action Type:
❑ Standard Permit
✓ Nationwide Permit 9
Regional General Permit 9
Jurisdictional Determination Request
Section 10 and 404 ❑
❑ Pre -Application Request
::]Unauthorized Activity
❑ Compliance
❑ No Permit Required
Revised 20150602

Environmental Services Proposal
Pilot Proposal7372
October 26, 2021
AGENT AUTHORIZATION
This form authorizes Pilot to act as our agent in stream/wetland matters including U.S. Army
Corps of Engineers and North Carolina Division of Water Resources field verification and
permitting.
Property Address: /G• C !�/ /
Owner Information: ('Grr/D,i/ Gf�QQos ��SJoClTFS� LL C
Address: e Z_ 224
L r /jiiYlG�f%I �C 2I1.2.
Telephone Number: lv - Z dZZZ IV
-
Fax Number:
E-mail Address: ,F_4 36;' 41J 41,19h1f �'i,i&A?94 G0drllAendq • &/n
JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION REQUEST
D. PROPERTY ACCESS CERTIFICATION
By signing below, I authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers (Corps) to enter upon the property herein described for the purpose of conducting on -
site investigations, if necessary, and issuing a jurisdictional determination pursuant to Section
404 of the Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899. I, the
undersigned, am either a duly authorized owner of record of the property identified herein, or
acting as the duly authorized agent of the owner of record of the property.
D'
Print Name
Capacity: _ Owner /Authorized Agent
Date _ a- a '03
Signature
5

DGa4Gf tP
& Ea Y Imo++ 9m Lfb
•M—h
Frnn Porn i000 ALo
IIgGg¢udrr�gln
� � lIC1Wp Preek
1 � C[rd MEwi�sICOFI Pemss
�I` Mgr l.M Aaa�<e Nns
Snwtnen
N25 Lwk B+.M! Rakd ANnn1tlE._
• � HC 1h4p Prceis-10.11.19
• T 6153-Menwk Pd,WQaev aJC1a_
u�rAlfevlkf�,.K
• � 3 A�w�gn.m i,.s.w�
awwva. cmrar �r
uwiwfenv¢^
• • �o wawne.y_le.e,e1
,
3 wlz_m ka� ia�sa-wow ��
1 Ll-•f
+� •a.n l,nnlvry
:193_Rudd irci 011Y�SR-W11y
• ._I� -01 Awmdary
yryA4d PNlfmf�
Carkon Aoad Sne
w P.4 o
¢km AAe
� � lmP¢r•ry Wces
■ la NO Aes_ IS Clutledf �) NC SI .- [I V
i
fre9esel .g�harp!L 75MKIL Map12021_ MIM2021— ' ss•F € 1a E r ■ A a uy W V „ti', ■

SYA T;
�:=�,. _.
a �'
;3 y
�7-
NORTH CAROLINA
Environmental Quality
Water Resources
Office Use Only
Corps Action ID no. [Click to enter.] Date received: 11/8/2021
DWR project no. Date received: 11/8/2021
Site Coordinates:
Latitude (DD.DDDDDD): 36.146756'
Longitude (DD.DDDDDD):-81.791826'
Form Version 1.5, September 2020
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
(Ver. 1.5, September 2020)
For Nationwide Permits and Regional General Permits and corresponding Water Quality Certifications
Please note: fields marked with a red asterisk are required. The form is not considered complete until all mandatory
questions are answered.
The online help file may be found at this link:
https:Hedocs.deg.nc.gov/WaterResources/0/edocl6247041PCN%2OHelp%2OFile%202018-1-30.pdf
The help document may be found at this link:
http://www.saw. usace.army. mil/Missions/Regulatory-Permit-Program/Permits/2017-Nationwide-Permits/Pre-
construction-Notification/
Before submitting this form, please ensure you have submitted the Pre -Filing Meeting Request Form as DWR will not be
able to accept your application without this important first step. The Pre -Filing Meeting Request Form is used to satisfy 40
C.F.R. Section 121.4(a) which states "At least 30 days prior to submitting a certification request, the project proponent shall
request a pre -filing meeting with the certifying agency." In accordance with 40 C.F.R. Section 121.5(b)(7), and (c)(5), all
certification requests must include documentation that a pre -filing meeting request was submitted to the certifying authority
at least 30 days prior to submitting the certification request.
Attach documentation of Pre -Filing Meeting Request to this Application.
Date of Pre -filing Meeting Request (MM/DD/YYYY) *: Click or tap to enter a date.
DWR ID # Click to enter. Version Click to enter. (If applicable)
A. Processing Information
County (counties) where project is located:
Watauga Additional (if needed).
Is this a public transportation project?
(Publicly funded municipal, state, or federal road, rail,
❑ Yes ❑x No
or airport project)
Is this a NCDOT project?
❑ Yes ❑x No
If yes, NCDOT TIP or state project number:
Click to enter.
If yes, NCDOT WBS number:
Click to enter.
❑x Section 404 Permit (wetlands, streams, waters,
Clean Water Act)
la. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps:
❑ Section 10 Permit (navigable waters, tidal
waters, Rivers and Harbors Act)
Pagel of 21 PCN Form - Version 1.5, September 2020

❑x Nationwide Permit (NWP)
1 b. Permit type(s)?
❑ Regional General Permit (RGP)
❑ Standard (IP)
This form may be used to initiate the standard/ individual permit process with the USACE. Please contact your Corps
representative concerning submittals for standard permits. All required items can be included as separate attachments
and submitted with this form.
1 c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
❑ Yes ❑x No
NWP number(s):
NWP 18
RGP number(s):
Click to enter.
1 d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWR (check all that apply):
❑x 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ 401 Water Quality Certification— Express
❑ Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization
❑ Individual 401 Water Quality Certification
1e. Is this notification solely for the record because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWR 401 Certification: *
❑ Yes ❑x No
For the record only for Corps Permit: *
❑ Yes ❑x No
1f. Is this an after -the -fact permit/certification application?
❑ Yes ❑x No
1 g. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for
mitigation of impacts?
❑ Yes ❑x No
If yes, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program.
1 h. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties?
❑ Yes ❑x No
1 i. Is the project located within an NC DCM Area of Environmental
Concern (AEC)?
❑ Yes ❑x No ❑ Unknown
1j. Is the project located in a designated trout watershed?
❑ Yes ❑x No
If yes, you must attach a copy of the approval letter from the appropriate Wildlife Resource Commission Office.
Trout information may be found at this link: http://www.saw.usace.army.mil/Missions/Regulatory-Permit-
Program/Agency-Coordination/Trout.aspx
Page 2 of 21 PCN Form - Version 1.5, September 2020

B. Applicant Information
1 a.
Who is the primary contact?
Bob Hodges
1 b.
Primary Contact Email:
[e-mail]
1 c.
Primary Contact Phone: (###)###-####
[phone]
1 d.
Who is applying for the permit/certification? (check
all that apply)
❑ Owner ❑x Applicant (other than owner)
1 e.
Is there an agent/consultant for this project?
® Yes ❑ No
2.
Landowner Information
2a.
Name(s) on Recorded Deed:
Clevon Woods Associates, LLC
2b.
Deed Book and Page No.:
2169/615
2c.
Responsible Party (for corporations):
Click to enter.
2d.
Address
Street Address:
PO Box 32
Address line 2:
�licktu 1Z;1Rer.
City:
Boone
State/ Province/ Region:
North Carolina
Postal/ Zip Code:
28607
Country:
US
2e.
Telephone Number: * (###)###-####
Click to enter.
2f.
Fax Number: (###)###-####
Click to enter.
2g.
Email Address: *
Click to enter.
3.
Applicant Information (if different from owner)
3a.
Name:
Bob Hodges
3b.
Business Name (if applicable):
Williams General Contracting, Inc.
3c.
Address:
Street Address:
PO Box 1686
Address line 2:
Clicktu MILM.
City:
Clemmons
State/ Province/ Region:
NC
Postal/ Zip Code:
27012
Country
US
3d.
Telephone Number: (###)###-####
[phone]
3e
Fax Number: (###)###-####
UICK io enter.
Page 3 of 21 PCN Form - Version 1.5, September 2020

3f. Email Address: [e-mail]
4. Agent/ Consultant (if applicable)
4a. Name: *
Michael T. Brame
4b. Business Name:
Pilot Environmental, Inc.
4c. Address: *
Street Address:
743 Park Lawn Court
Address line 2:
Click to enter.
City:
Kernersville
State/ Province/ Region:
NC
Postal/ Zip Code:
27284
Country:
U.S.
4d. Telephone Number: (###)###-####
[phone]
4e Fax Number: (###)###-####
Click to enter.
4f. Email Address: *
[e-mail]
Agent Authorization Letter:
Attach a completed/signed agent authorization form or letter. A sample form may be found at this link:
https://www.saw. usace.army. mil/Missions/Regulatory-Permit-Program/Permits/2017-Nationwide-Permits/Pre-
construction-Notification/
Page 4 of 21 PCN Form - Version 1.5, September 2020

C. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Project Information
1 a. Name of project:
Clevon Woods OSWW Plant
1 b. Subdivision name (if appropriate):
Click to enter.
1 c. Nearest municipality/town: *
Foscoe, NC
2.
Project Identification
2a.
Property identification number (tax PIN or parcel ID):
1878-53-7991-000
2b.
Property size (in acres):
0.576
2c.
Project Address:
Street Address:
Aldridge Road
Address line 2:
Click to enter
City:
Foscoe
State/ Province/ Region:
NC
Postal/ Zip Code:
28604
Country:
U.S.
2d.
Site coordinates in decimal degrees (using 4-6 digits
after the decimal point): *
Latitude (DD.DDDDDD): 36.146756'
Longitude (-DD.DDDDDD):--81.791826°
3. Surface Waters
3a. Name of nearest body of water to proposed project:
Watauga River
3b. Water Resources Classification of nearest receiving
Class B; Trout, High Quality Waters
water:
The Surface Water Classification map may be found at this link:
https://ncdenr.maps.arcqis.com/apps/webappviewer/index.html?id=6e125ad7628f494694e259c80dd64265
Watauga
3c. In what river basin(s) is your project located? *
Choose additional (if needed)
3d. Please provide the 12-digit HUC in which the project is
060101030301
located:
The Find Your HUC map may be found at this link:
https://ncdenr.maps.arcgis.com/apps/Publiclnformation/index.html?appid=ad3a85aOc6d644aOb97cdO69db238ac3
Page 5 of 21 PCN Form - Version 1.5, September 2020

4.
Project Description and History
4a.
Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of
this application:
The site contains undeveloped, wooded land. The site is located in a mixed residential/commercial area of
Foscoe.
4b.
Have Corps permits or DWR certifications been obtained for this
❑ Yes ❑x No ❑ Unknown
project (including all prior phases) in the past?
4c.
If yes, please give the DWR Certification number and/or Corps
[Click to enter.]
Action ID (ex. SAW-0000-00000):
jClick to enter.]
Attach any pertinent project history documentation
4d.
Attach an 8'h x 11" excerpt from the most recent version of the USGS topographic map indicating the location of
the project site.
4e.
Attach an 8'h x 11" excerpt from the most recent version of the published County NRCS Soil Survey map
depicting the project site.
4f.
List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the
0.094 acres
property:
4g.
List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent
0 linear feet
and perennial) on the property:
4g1.
List the total estimated acreage of all existing open waters on the
0 acres
property:
4h.
Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
The purpose of the proposed project is to construct a Clevon Woods OSWW Plant.
4i.
Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
The overall project includes the construction of wastewater plant including a proposed building and associated access
ways/parking areas. In order to facilitate the proposed development, it is necessary to impact the wetland on the site.
To facilitate the development of the site, clearing and grading the site is necessary. Graders, haulers, excavators and
other heavy equipment will be used during grading and construction of the site.
4j.
Attach project drawings/site diagrams/depictions of impact areas for the proposed project.
5. Jurisdictional Determinations
5a. Have the wetlands or streams been delineated on
the property or in
® Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
proposed impact areas?
Comments:
The site was delineated by Brushy Fork Environmental Consulting, Inc. (Report Dated February 21, 2018). To our
knowledge, the delineation has not been verified.
Name (if known): Adam Williams/Peter Smith
5b. If 5a is yes, who delineated the jurisdictional
Agency/Consultant Company: Brushy Fork Environmental
areas?
Consulting, Inc.
Other: ^,lick to enter
5c. If the Corps made a jurisdictional determination,
❑ Preliminary ❑ Approved ❑ Emailed Concurrence
what type of determination was made?
❑ Not Verified ❑x Unknown
Corps AID number (ex. SAW-0000-00000):
Click to enter.
Page 6 of 21 PCN Form - Version 1.5, September 2020

5d. List the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determination or State determination if a determination was made by
either agency.
'lick to PntP,r
5d1. Attach jurisdictional determinations.
Page 7 of 21 PCN Form - Version 1.5, September 2020

6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project?
❑ Yes ❑x No
6b. If yes, explain.
'lick to enter.
Are any other NWP(s), regional general permit(s), or individual permit(s) used, or intended to be used, to authorize
any part of the proposed project or related activity? This includes other separate and distant crossings for linear
projects that require Department of the Army authorization but don't require pre -construction notification.
We are not aware of other permits that are intended to be used.
Page 8 of 21 PCN Form - Version 1.5, September 2020

D. Proposed Impacts Inventory
Impacts Summary
❑x Wetlands
1 a. Where are the impacts associated with your project ❑ Buffers
(check all that apply):
❑ Pond Construction
❑ Streams - tributaries
❑ Open Waters
2.
Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, complete this table for each wetland area impacted.
2a.
2a1.
2b.
2c.
2d.
2e.
2f.
2g.
Site #
Impact
Impact
Wetland Name
Wetland Type
Forested
Jurisdiction
Impact Area
Reason/Type
Duration
?
Type*
(ac)
W1
Fill (Incl.
Permanent
Unnamed
Headwater
Yes
Both
0.094
Riprap)
Forest
W2
Choose one
Temp/
Click to enter
Choose one
Choose one
Click to
Perm
enter
W3
Choose one
Temp/
Click to enter
Choose one
Y/N
Choose one
Click to
Perm
enter
W4
Choose one
Temp/
Click to enter
Choose one
Y/N
Choose one
Click to
Perm
enter
W5
Choose one
Temp/
Click to enter
Choose one
Y/N
Choose one
Click to
Perm
enter
W6
Choose one
Temp/
Click to enter
Choose one
Y/N
Choose one
Click to
Perm
enter
2g1.
Total temporary wetland impacts
Click to enter. ac
2g2.
Total permanent wetland impacts
0.094 ac
2g3.
Total wetland impacts
0.094 ac
2h.
Comments:
Wetland Impacts are associated with building and access
road/parking areas on the site.
The site is small
and in order
to use it as a wastewater treatment plant, it is necessary to develop the entire site. It is necessary to impact a 0.094
acre wetland on the northeastern portion of the site. The wetland is a small portion of a much
larger wetland
that is
located on adjacent property east of the site.
Page 9 of 21 PCN Form - Version 1.5, September 2020

3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream/ tributary impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site,
complete this table for all stream/ tributary sites impacted.
** All Perennial or Intermittent streams must be verified by DWR or delegated local government
Site #
3a.
Impact Reason/
Type
3b.
Impact
Duration
3d.
Stream Name
3e.
Stream
Type
3f.
Jurisdiction
Type
3g.
Stream Width
(avg ft)
3h.
Impact length
(linear ft)
S1
Choose one
Temp/ Perm
Click to enter
Per/Int
Choose one
Click to enter
Click to enter
S2
Choose one
Temp/ Perm
Click to enter
Per/Int
Choose one
Click to enter
Click to enter
S3
Choose one
Temp/ Perm
Click to enter
Per/Int
Choose one
Click to enter
Click to enter
S4
Choose one
Temp/ Perm
Click to enter
Per/Int
Choose one
Click to enter
Click to enter
S5
Choose one
Temp/ Perm
Click to enter
Per/Int
Choose one
Click to enter
Click to enter
S6
Choose one
Temp/ Perm
Click to enter
Per/Int
Choose one
Click to enter
Click to enter
S7
Choose one
Temp/ Perm
Click to enter
Per/Int
Choose one
Click to enter
Click to enter
S8
Choose one
Temp/ Perm
Click to enter
Per/Int
Choose one
Click to enter
Click to enter
S9
Choose one
Temp/ Perm
Click to enter
Per/Int
Choose one
Click to enter
Click to enter
S10
Choose one
Temp/ Perm
Click to enter
Per/Int
Choose one
Click to enter
Click to enter
S11
Choose one
Temp/ Perm
Click to enter
Per/Int
Choose one
Click to enter
Click to enter
S12
Choose one
Temp/ Perm
Click to enter
Per/Int
Choose one
Click to enter
Click to enter
S13
Choose one
Temp/ Perm
Click to enter
Per/Int
Choose one
Click to enter
Click to enter
S14
Choose one
Temp/ Perm
Click to enter
Per/Int
Choose one
Click to enter
Click to enter
S15
Choose one
Temp/ Perm
Click to enter
Per/Int
Choose one
Click to enter
Click to enter
3i1. Total jurisdictional ditch impact:
Click to enter. linear ft
3i2. Total permanent stream impacts:
Click to enter. linear ft
36. Total temporary stream impacts:
Click to enter. linear ft
3i4. Total stream and ditch impacts:
Click to enter. linear ft
3j. Comments:
Stream impacts are not proposed.
Page 10 of 21 PCN Form - Version 1.5, September 2020

4.
Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries,
sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other
open water of the U.S., individually list all open water impacts in the table below.
4a.
4b.
4c.
4d.
4e.
4e1.
4f.
Site #
Impact Reason/
Impact
Waterbody Name
Waterbody
Jurisdiction
Impact area (ac)'
Type
Duration
Type*
Type
01
Choose one
Temp/
Click to enter.
Choose one
Choose one
Click to enter.
Perm
02
Choose one
Temp/
Click to enter.
Choose one
Choose one
Click to enter.
Perm
03
Choose one
Temp/
Click to enter.
Choose one
Choose one
Click to enter.
Perm
04
Choose one
Temp/
Click to enter.
Choose one
Choose one
Click to enter.
Perm
4g.
Total temporary open water impacts
Click to enter. ac
4g.
Total permanent open water impacts
Click to enter. ac
4g.
Total open water impacts
Click to enter. ac
4h.
Comments:
Open water impacts are not proposed.
5.
Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction is proposed, complete
the table
below. (*This
does NOT include ofFline stormwater
management ponds.)
5a.
5b.
5c.
5d.
5e.
Pond ID
Proposed use or
Wetland Impacts
(ac)
Stream
Impacts (ft)
Upland
#
purpose of pond
Impacts (ac)
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
P1
Choose one
Click to
Click tL
Click to
Click to
Click to
Click to
Click to
enter.
enter.
enter.
enter.
enter.
enter.
enter.
P2
Choose one
Click to
Click to
Click to
Click to
Click to
Click to
Click to
enter.
enter.
enter.
enter.
enter.
enter.
enter.
5f.
Total
Click to
Click to
Click to
Click to
Click to
Click to
Click to
enter.
enter.
enter.
enter.
enter.
enter.
enter.
5g.
Comments:
Pond or lake construction is not proposed.
5h.
Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes ❑ No
If yes, permit ID no.:
Click to enter.
5i.
Expected pond surface area (acres):
Click to enter.
5j.
Size of pond watershed (acres):
Click to enter.
5k.
Method of construction:
Click to enter.
Page 11 of 21 PCN Form - Version 1.5, September 2020

6. Buffer Impacts (DWR requirement)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. Individually list all buffer impacts.
6a. Project is in which protected basin(s)?
(Check all that apply.)
❑ Neuse ❑ Tar -Pamlico ❑ Catawba
❑ Jordan ❑ Goose Creek ❑ Randleman
❑ Other: Click to enter.
Site #*
6b.
Impact Type*
6c.
Impact Duration*
6d.
Stream Name*
6e.
Buffer
Mitigation
Required?*
6f.
Zone 1 Impact*
(sq ft)
6g.
Zone 2 Impact*
(sq ft)
B1
Choose one
Temp/ Perm
Click to enter.
Y/N
Click to enter.
Click to enter.
B2
Choose one
Temp/ Perm
Click to enter.
Y/N
Click to enter.
Click to enter.
B3
Choose one
Temp/ Perm
Click to enter.
Y/N
Click to enter.
Click to enter.
B4
Choose one
Temp/ Perm
Click to enter.
Y/N
Click to enter.
Click to enter.
B5
Choose one
Temp/ Perm
Click to enter.
Y/N
Click to enter.
Click to enter.
B6
Choose one
Temp/ Perm
Click to enter.
Y/N
Click to enter
Click to enter.
B7
Choose one
Temp/ Perm
Click to enter.
Y/N
Click to enter
Click to enter.
B8
Choose one
Temp/ Perm
Click to enter.
Y/N
Click to enter
Click to enter.
B9
Choose one
Temp/ Perm
Click to enter.
Y/N
Click to enter
Click to enter.
B10
Choose one
Temp/ Perm
Click to enter.
Y/N
Click to enter
Click to enter.
6h. Total temporary impacts:
Zone 1: Click to enter. sq ft
Zone 2: Click to enter. sq ft
6h. Total permanent impacts:
Zone 1: Click to enter. sq ft
Zone 2: Click to enter. sq ft
6h. Total combined buffer impacts:
Zone 1: Click to enter. sq ft
Zone 2: Click to enter. sq ft
6i. Comments:
Please attach supporting documentation (impact maps, plan sheets, etc.) for the proposed project.
Page 12 of 21 PCN Form - Version 1.5, September 2020

E. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1 a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through project design:
The applicant has designed the proposed development to avoid impacts to other streams and wetlands. The project
has been designed on the smallest available lot that can contain the WWTP.
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize proposed impacts through construction techniques:
The clearing limits will be surveyed, staked and silt fencing and clearing limit fencing will be used. Disturbed areas will
be seeded and mulched to limit sediment from entering downgradient waters. Slope matting will be used on steep
slopes.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S., Waters of the State, or Riparian Buffers
2a. If compensatory mitigation is required, by whom is it required? ❑ DWR ❑ Corps
(check all that apply)
2b. If yes, which mitigation option(s) will be used for this ❑ Mitigation Bank
project? (check all that apply) ❑ In Lieu Fee Program
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if using a Mitigation Bank
(Must satisfy NC General Statute143-214.11 (d1).)
3a. Name of mitigation bank:
Click to enter.
3b. Credits purchased/requested:
Type: Choose one
Quantity Click to enter.
Type: Choose one
Quantity Click to enter.
Type: Choose one
Quantity Click to enter.
Attach receipt and/or approval letter.
3c. Comments:
Mitigation is not required or proposed.
4.
Complete if Using an In Lieu Fee Program
4a.
Attach approval letter from in lieu fee program.
4b.
Stream mitigation requested:
Click to enter. linear feet
4c.
If using stream mitigation, what is the stream temperature:
Choose one
NC Stream Temperature Classification Maps can be found under the Mitigation Concepts tab on the Wilmington
District's RIBITS website: (Please use the filter and select Wilmington district)
https://ribits.usace.army.mil/ribits apex/f?p=107:27:2734709611497::NO: RP: P27 BUTTON KEY:O
4d.
Buffer mitigation requested (DWR only):
Click to enter. square feet
4e.
Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
Click to enter. acres
4f.
Non -riparian wetland mitigation requested:
Click to enter. acres
4g.
Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested:
Click to enter. acres
Page 13 of 21 PCN Form - Version 1.5, September 2020

4h. Comments:
Click to enter.
5. Complete if Providing a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If proposing a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan,
including the amount of mitigation proposed.
Click to enter
5b. Attach mitigation plan/documentation.
6.
Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — DWR requirement
6a.
Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer
❑ Yes ❑x No
that requires buffer mitigation?
If yes, please complete this entire section — please contact DWR for more information.
6b.
If yes, identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires
mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required in the table below.
6c.
6d.
6e.
Zone
Reason for impact
Total impact (square
Multiplier
Required mitigation
feet)
(square feet)
Zone 1
Click to enter.
Click to enter.
:,hoose one
Click to enter.
Zone 2
;lick to enter.
Click fo enter
" hnnca nna
Click to enter.
6f. Total buffer mitigation required
Click to enter.
6g.
If buffer mitigation is required, is payment to a mitigation bank or
❑ Yes ❑ No
NC Division of Mitigation Services proposed?
6h.
If yes, attach the acceptance letter from the mitigation bank or NC Division of Mitigation Services.
6i.
Comments:
Buffer mitigation is not required or proposed.
Page 14 of 21 PCN Form - Version 1.5, September 2020

F. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (DWR requirement)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1 a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers
❑ Yes ❑x No
identified within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b. All buffer impacts and high ground impacts require diffuse flow or other forms of stormwater treatment. If the
project is subject to a state implemented riparian buffer protection program, include a plan that fully documents
how diffuse flow will be maintained.
All Stormwater Control Measures (SCM) must be designed in accordance with the NC Stormwater Design
Manual (https://deg.nc.gov/about/divisions/energv-mineral-land-resources/energv-mineral-land-permit-
guidance/stormwater-bmp-manual).
Associated supplement forms and other documentation must be provided.
❑ Level Spreader
What Type of SCM are you
❑ Vegetated Conveyance (lower seasonal high water table- SHWT)
providing?
❑ Wetland Swale (higher SHWT)
(Check all that apply)
❑ Other SCM that removes minimum 30% nitrogen
❑ Proposed project will not create concentrated stormwater flow through the
buffer
For a list of options to meet the diffuse flow requirements, click here:
Attach diffuse flow documentation.
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. Is this an NCDOT project subject to compliance with NCDOT's
Individual NPDES permit NCS000250?
El Yes ❑x No
2b. Does this project meet the requirements for low density projects as
defined in 15A NCAC 02H .1003(2)?
❑ Yes ❑x No
To look up low density requirements, click here:
http://reports.oah.state.nc.us/ncac/title%2015a%20-%20environmental%20guality/chapter%2002%20-
%20environmental%20management/subchapter%20h/15a%20ncac%2002h%20.1003.pdf
2c. IS the project over an acre?
❑ Yes ❑x No
2d. Does this project have a stormwater management plan (SMP)
reviewed and approved under a state stormwater program or state-
❑ Yes ❑x No
approved local government stormwater program?
Note: Projects that have vested rights, exemptions, or grandfathering from state or locally implemented
stormwater programs or projects that satisfy state or locally -implemented stormwater programs through use of
community in -lieu programs should answer "no" to this question.
2e. Which of the following stormwater management program(s) apply?
❑x Local Government
(Check all that apply)
❑ State
If you have local government approval, please include the SMP on their overall impact map.
Page 15 of 21 PCN Form - Version 1.5, September 2020

❑ Phase II ❑ USMP
Local Government Stormwater Programs
❑ NSW ❑ Water Supply
Please identify which local government stormwater program you are using.
Watauga County
❑ Phase II ❑x HQW or ORW
State Stormwater Programs
❑ Coastal Counties ❑ Other
Comments:
Watauga County does not require a stormwater plan because the site is less than an acre.
Page 16 of 21 PCN Form - Version 1.5, September 2020

G. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation
1 a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local)
❑ Yes ❑x No
funds or the use of public (federal/state) land?
1 b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require
preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or State (North Carolina) Environmental
❑ Yes ❑ No
Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1 c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been
finalized by the State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the
❑ Yes ❑ No
NEPA or SEPA final approval letter.)
Comments:
A NEPA or SEPA is not required.
2. Violations (DWR Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWR Water Quality Certification Rules (15A
NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300),
DR Surface Water or Wetland Standards or Riparian Buffer Rules El Yes ❑x No
W
(15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b. If you answered "yes" to the above question, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
Click to enter.
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWR Requirement)
3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future
impacts) result in additional development, which could impact nearby
❑ Yes ❑x No
downstream water quality?
3b. If you answered "no", provide a short narrative description:
Additional development as a result of the proposed development is not anticipated.
3c. If yes, attach a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis (.pdo in accordance with the most recent
DWR policy.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWR Requirement)
4a. Is sewage disposal required by DWR for this project? I ® Yes ❑ No ❑ N/A
4b. If yes, describe in detail the treatment methods and dispositions (non -discharge or discharge) of wastewater
generated from the proposed project. If the wastewater will be treated at a treatment plant, list the capacity
available at that plant.
The NPDES Permit has been issued by the NCDEQ. Final engineering plans are being submitted for the Authorization
to Construct. Wastewater will be treated in an activated sludge package treatment plant, treated to tertiary treatment
limits and discharged in to the Watauga River per the NPDES Permit NC0070408.
Page 17 of 21 PCN Form - Version 1.5, September 2020

5.
Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a.
Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected
® Yes ❑ No
species or habitat? (IPAC weblink: https://www.fws.gov/ipac/ Ifws.govl)
5b.
Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species
❑ Yes ❑x No
Act impacts?
5c.
If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
:,hoose one
5d.
Is another federal agency involved?
❑ Yes ❑x No ❑ Unknown
If yes, which federal agency?
Click to enter.
5e.
Is this a DOT project located within Divisions 1-8?
❑ Yes ❑x No
5f.
Will you cut any trees in order to conduct the work in waters of the
U.S.?
®Yes ElNo
5g.
Does this project involve bridge maintenance or removal? *
❑ Yes ❑x No
Link to NLEB SLOPES document: http://saw-reg.usace. army. mil/NLEB/1-30-17-signed NLEB-
SLOPES&apps.pdf
5h.
Does this project involve the construction/ installation of a wind
turbine(s)?
❑ Yes ❑x No
If yes, please show the location of the wind turbine(s) on the permit drawings/ project plans (attach .pdo
5i.
Does this project involve blasting and /or other percussive activities
that will be conducted by machines, such as jackhammers,
❑ Yes ❑x No
mechanized pile drivers, etc.?
If yes, please provide details to include type of percussive activity, purpose, duration, and specific location of this
activity on the property (attach .pdo
5j.
What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated
Critical Habitat?
US Department of the Interior — Fish and Wildlife Service Official Species List from IPaC
6 listed species are identified on the IPaC report (attached). Gray bat, Northern Long-eared bat, Virginia Big -eared bat,
Bog turtle, Monarch butterfly and Hellers blazingstar are federally listed species included in the report.
Gray bats and Virginia long-eared bats live in caves year around. Suitable habitat for these species is not located on
the site. Bog turtle is listed due to similarity in appearance. Turtles that may be similar in appearance to the protected
turtle, should they be encountered on the site, will not be transported from the site. Suitable habitat for Monarch
butterfly and Hellers blazingstar was not observed on the site.
Wooded areas on the site could afford suitable summer roosting habitat for northern long-eared bats. Similar habitat
was observed on surrounding properties. Therefore, tree clearing outside of the pup season (June 1 to July 31) is not
likely to adversely affect the NLEB. If tree clearing activities cannot be conducted outside of the pup season, then the
applicant will rely on the final 4(d) rule and any take will be considered exempt from the ESA.
Attach consultation documentation.
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
Page 18 of 21 PCN Form - Version 1.5, September 2020

6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as
an Essential Fish Habitat?
❑ Yes
❑x No
Are there submerged aquatic vegetation (SAV) around
the project vicinity?
El Yes
❑x No El Unknown
Will this project affect submerged aquatic vegetation?
❑ Yes
❑x No ❑ Unknown
Explain:
Dlick to enter.
6b. What data source(s) did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
Essential Fish Habitat Mapper— NOAA Fisheries
Page 19 of 21 PCN Form - Version 1.5, September 2020

7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
Link to the State Historic Preservation Office Historic Properties Map (does not include archaeological data):
http://gis.ncdcr.gov/hpoweb/
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural
preservation status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or
❑ Yes ❑x No
properties significant in North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data source(s) did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological
resources?
NC Historic Preservation Office's HPOWEB 2.0. Historic properties were not identified on the site. A surveyed only
property is identified approximately 500 feet from the site. Other properties are located more than 2,000 feet from the
site. A copy of the SHPO Map is included as an attachment.
7c. Attach historic or prehistoric documentation.
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
Link to the FEMA Floodplain Maps: https://msc.fema.gov/portal/search
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain? *
® Yes ❑ No
8b. If yes, explain how the project meets FEMA requirements.
The building site is to be raised above the base flood elevation with fill.
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?
National Flood Hazard Layer froom FEMA Web Map Service — Drawing 4 (Attached)
Page 20 of 21 PCN Form - Version 1.5, September 2020

H. Miscellaneous
Comments:
Please let Pilot know if you need additional information in order to issue the PCN.
Attach pertinent documentation or attachments not previously requested
I. Signature *
❑x By checking the box and signing below, I, as the project proponent, certify to the following:
• The project proponent hereby certifies that all information contained herein is true, accurate, and complete, to
the best of my knowledge and belief;
• The project proponent hereby requests that the certifying authority review and take action on this CWA 401
certification request within the applicable reasonable period of time;
• The project proponent hereby agrees that submission of this PCN form is a "transaction" subject to Chapter
66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act");
• The project proponent hereby agrees to conduct this transaction by electronic means pursuant to Chapter 66,
Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act");
• The project proponent hereby understands that an electronic signature has the same legal effect and can be
enforced in the same way as a written signature; AND
• As the project proponent, I intend to electronically sign and submit the PCN/online form.
Full Name: Michael T. Brame
Signature:
Michael
Brame
11 /8/2021
Page 21 of 21 PCN Form - Version 1.5, September 2020

NO=iSNOae a3eda ioN
—,°°,q MMM
TECTZCZ — T -
• saowaS 114uawuonnu3•
inOAVI 31IS d11NM 43SOdOldd
Adss�dz dMn IAA
abOd-9NIMVaG, I-
oocdz¢--T -111
BuiAomnS. BuuaauiBu3. Buiuuuld
euil euiMe�o
7,•� �" ,,,�
P soC
TOIK IN'aiil°avv
INIIIII- 11 Ay bV�JVM
—S 11
aoa�ab
1TV LT
eNw
V■
[(
SNVld ONLLLIWb3d D1V
j N
�
z
o-3ioN sv
_
wvo
\M\ / �
s V
Lz0z6zU
wiiiwens eiv
-� "
N -�oN,re
1NVld MMSO Sa00M NOn3l:
TZ666S
even
sNni—Ii ienssNrncinaN
oN
., ern
,,, ",,,•' O�
eNw
.,2.a�b.�
°'°
w
oN nero�d
zpp�m ids `N o`gk3oNi
- 0,1
I 4
oW ,Ili I
i
i
i•
Dili III °�i
°
°
o
o
� aF
d
16,
J
- m
lo
°
o
°
o
g
�z
_
• o
�w
o
8
8
80
0 8w
8 8
F,
8
8
8
8
86.w
♦ �
�
0
0 �
0
0
� �
0 0
�
�
0
�
�
0
�• SO
1 i-t
sm
Of
�4���,•,��i�q��iiYi�1 ��J��,. r
•y' ,�•� r., v���l � r1;•, r�iili,{ ��• p•
Ir�,�.r�l�rli��� •��,��r�7jt1iD1���'i•�, r���h(�
•��i • i1i� ��•��i,.•�ir,Ci�•,r. •1. 1• r i��
11 ��•Y•�• R i► iiK` ��. •1�� tt�'r it i• •�i �•¢�
•{it�4iii i'���i{i4C cf li•it��i •�,p� �11
�i, r�iiii, t ti •� � .1 � °� ��1 i�;r •ha
1i��,��rlx�i� ,�•�li gi. r��j{ii i�1��ri
"t''��• 11i�i�{ {i�a �0�i �8
1 � lid •�,�,���K�
, 06, :{i�,r ti •�1•1�
• , • �pc�� ��. r
.Hid ��•��, 1 . •��, r'�iilii ��
��,. • ipti, t tp�•r• ,�: ti • �•will
A
�,, • i yt�, t tip• �, ► � •�• i t
O�i,t ti1•��, 1 it i► r��r ��i•��y�.�
,i��, r iKi,t •1• �,�♦ •i• �, 1 i;t�
��i����ir11�1 i�G*��� ��i�i•�'p•,�i' r�
P • O y. yy,.,�r 1 • ¢•�l,
1�,v� �K•l.as
� i��� �• Ai� �ti
1�i i

Jurisdictional Determination Report
BBR Enterprises, LLC WWTP Site
Watauga County, North Carolina
Prepared By:
Brushy Fork Environmental Consulting, Inc.
5902 Highway 421 South
Mountain City, Tennessee 37683
[phone]
www.bfec.org
Date
February 21, 2018
Prepared For:
8BR Enterprises, LLC

Table of Contents
I. INTRODUCTION AND LOCATION
2. REGULATORY DEFINITIONS
3. TECHNICAL DEFINITIONS
4. SITE DESCRIPTION
4.1.. General
4.2. Solis 4
4.3. Wetlands 5
4.4. Streams
APPENDICES
A. Location Map
B. USDA Soils Map (Project Site)
C. Jurisdictional Site Map (Project Site)
D. Wetland Determination Data Forms (01)
E. Stream Identification Data Forms JUT 3, UT 2, UT Laurel Fork)
F, USACE Preliminary Jurisdictional Forms)
G. Project Site Photosheets

1. INTRODUCTION AND LOCATION
Brushy Fork Environmental Consulting, Inc. conducted a United States Army Corps of Engineers (USACE)
jurisdictional delineation on four (4) property parcels {Watauga County, NC) for BBR Enterprises, LLC on
February 61h and 7rl' 2018, This report presents the findings of "waters of the United States" Including
jurisdictional streams and wetlands, and "waters of the.S'tate". The property borders Highway 105 to the
southeast, northwest and the north side of Aldridge Road. A site map with aerial photography and USGS
location map for the property are given In Appendix A.
The jurisdictional wetland delineation was conducted according to guidelines set forth in the USACE
"Regional Supplement to the Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual: Eastern Mountains and
Piedmont Region (Version 2,G)" (April 2012). As the regulating authority of Section 404/4D1 of the
Clean Water Act, the USACE and state of North Carolina must make the final determination as to the
jurisdictional status of this site.
Wetlands were determined to be present at the BBR Enterprises, LLC site due to the presence of wetland
hydrology, hydric soils, and hydrophytic vegetation. One f 1) streams was identified and delineated on -site. The
stream Is referred to as unnamed tributary a (UT a), unnamed tributary b (UT b). UTa Is located on the
northwest side of NC Highway 105. UTa flows downstream under NC Highway 105 to the southeast side of the
highway continuing as UTb, The Ordinary High Water Mark (OHWM) was delineated, flagged, and surveyed for
the stream and is presented in the Site Map In Appendix C.
2. REGULATORY DEFINITIONS
"Waters of the United States" are regulated by the Corps of Engineers based on authority from Section 404 of
the Clean Water Act. They include waters that are or could be used for interstate commerce such as rivers,
wetlands, lakes, territorial seas and ponds, as well as streams, waterways and ditches below the "Ordinary
High Water Mark (OHWM)", Manmade water bodies and farmed wetlands may also be considered
Jurisdictional depending on their connection to other "waters of the U,5 " if they are not actively mined,
farmed or otherwise managed for five (5) years. A specific detailed definition of "waters of the United States"
can be found in the Federal Register (33 CFR 328.3), Activities in these areas will require a Corps of Engineers
permit if they include the discharge of dredged of fill material Into "waters of the U.S.".
"Waters of the State" are "any stream, river, brook, swamp, lake, sound, tidal estuary, bay, creek, reservoir,
waterway, or other body or accumulation of water, They can be surface or underground, public or private,
natural or artificial. Finally, they must be contained In, flow through, or border upon any portion of this State
(North Carolina) (including any portion of the Atlantic Ocean over which the State has jurisdiction)." This
definition is provided by the North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources, Division of
Water Resources, 401 Buffer Permitting Unit.
3. TECHNICAL DEFINITIONS
Wetlands are defined as areas that are inundated or saturated by surface or ground water at a frequency and
duration sufficient to support, and that under normal circumstances do support, a prevalence of vegetation
typically adapted for life In saturated soil conditions. They are identified based on the three -parameter
approach outlined in the Corps of Engineers "Regional Supplement to the Corps of Engineers Wetland

Delineation Manual: Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Reglonal` (2012). The three criteria Include
hydrophytic vegetation, hydric soils and wetland hydrology. Generally, all three criteria must be present to
make a positive wetland determination. The criteria are defined as follows;
Hydrophytle vegetation, due to morphological, physiological and/or reproductive adaptation(s), has the ability
to grow, effectively compete, reproduce, and/or persist In anaerobic soil conditions, individual species have
been assignod Indicator status by the USFWS .. National Wetland Inventory and the National Plant List Panel.
Vegetation is considered hydric when more than 50%of the dominant species froth all strata are OBL, FACW,
FAC+ or FAC. Secondary vegetation rules Include the species Prevalence Index which takes non -dominant
species Into consideration, observed plant morphological and physiological adaptations, and certain
problematic wetland situations.
Indicator Status
Probability of Occurrence In Wetlands
Obligate Wetland - OBL
> 99%P
Facultative Wetland - FACW _
67-99%
Facultative - FAC
34-66% µ
Facultative Upland - FACU
1-33%
obligate Upland- UPL
<1%
Hydric so€Is are present If they have been class'sfled as hydric or when they possess characteristics associated
with reducing soil conditions known as hydric indicators. Wetland soils were evaluated for hydric indicators
with the USDA/MRCS report "Field Indicators of Hydric Soils In the United States, A guide for Indentlfying and
Delineating Hydric Sails, Version 7.0, 2010". Hydric soils in this report are those where an Indicator for "All" or
"Loamy and Clayey" soils (USDA Land Resource Region "P") is present. Colors were determined using the
Munsell soil color chart.
Hydrology In wetlands occurs in areas Inundated permanently or periodically at mean water depths of <6.6
feet, or if the soil is saturated to the surface for approximately nine (9) days consecutively during the growing
season of the prevalent vegetation. Wetland hydrology Indicators may be present above or below the surface.
Primary indicators include inundation, saturation in the upper 12 inches, watermarks on standing structure,
sediment deposits and hydrogen sulfide odor. A minimum of one primary Indicator Is required for the
presence of a wetland. Secondary indicators (two or more required) Include drainage patterns, moss trim
lines, crayfish burrows, and the FAC-neutral test.
In general, an area must meet all three criteria to he classified as a wetland. In certain "naturally problematic"
areas such as seasonal wetlands which are not wet at all times, or in recently disturbed situations, an area may
be considered a wetland if only two criteria are met.
Perennial stream means a well-defined channel that contains water year round during a year of normal
rainfall with the aquatic bed located below the water table for most of the year. Groundwater is the primary
source of water for a perennial stream, but it also carries stormwater runoff. A perennial stream exhibits the
typical biological, hydrological, and physical characteristics commonly associated with the continuous
conveyance of water,115A NCAC 028.0233(2)(1))
Intermittent stream means a well-defined channel that contains water for only part of the year, typically
during winter and spring when the aquatic bed is below the water table. The flow may be heavily

supplemented by stormwater runoff. An Intermittent stream often lacks the biological and hydrological
characteristics commonly associated with the conveyance of water. [15A NCAC 028.0233(2)(g)]
Ephemeral (stormwater) stream means a feature that carries only stormwater in direct response to
precipitation with water flowing only during and shortly after large precipitation events. An ephemeral stream
may or may not have a well-defined channel, the aquatic bed Is always above the water table, and stormwater
runoff Is the primary source of water. An ephemeral stream typically lacks the biological, hydrological, and
physical characteristics commonly associated with the continuous or intermittent conveyance of water. [15A
NCAC 02B .0233(2)(d))
4. SITE DESCRIPTION
4.1. General
The Subject area (-36.147404,-81.793194) is comprised of four (4) tracts in southwest Watauga County
immediately southeast of the town of Seven Devils, NC (Appendix A). The areas to be impacted include a
portions of the following tracts., Tract 1 Is 9.2t acre parcel, Tract 2, a 1.36# acre parcel, Tract 3, a 1.01 ± acre
parcel, and Tract 4 a 0.576± acre parcel . The project review area was evaluated for aquatic resources subject
to federal and state jurisdiction. Elevations on site is approximately 3200 feet above mean sea level
(Appendix A). The OUR Enterprises, LLC delineation site is located In the Watauga River Watershed; Hydrologic
Unit Code IHUC) 061010303030. The entirety of the area drains primarily southeast Into the Watauga River.
4.2. Solis
Two (2) soil types are mapped on the Area of interest (AO1), (USDA Web Soil Survey, accessed 02/2018).
Appendix B presents a soils map of the area, The approximate percent I%) of each soil type In the A01 is listed
In Table 1 below. Dellwood cobbfy sandy loam (DeB) Is the dominant soil present at the ADI (61.D%). Deg is
found on floodplains. it usually occurs on 1-5% slopes and Is considered moderately well -drained with
occasional mapped frequency of flooding, Culfasaja very cobbfy loam (CsC) is mapped on the remainder of
the property (39.0%). CsC usually occurs on coves of mountain slopes, drainageways on mountain slopes, and
fans on mountain slopes. it is generally found on B-15% slopes, Is well drained, and has no mapped frequency
of flooding. The soil types which occur on the subject property are listed and described in detall below:
Table 1.
Project Soils Information
% of
Area of
Interest
Frequency of
Soil Type _ _ _
(A01)
Landform
Drainage Class
Flooding
Dellwood cobbfy
Moderately
sandy loam (DeB)
61.0%
Floodplains
well -Drained
Occasional
Cullasaja very cobbly
Coves, fans, drainbge ways
loam (CSC)
39.0%
of mountain slopes
Wall -Drained
None

4.3 Wetlands
As previously stated, wetlands were located in the Subject Property. The wetland sampling point W1
(Appendix C and D) is located at the northwest corner of Tract 4. Typical vegatatlon Include luncus effusus
(Common Rush), dominant In small pockets over the sampling area, ScIrpus cypertnus (woolgrass) , Packera
aurea (Golden Ragwort), Solidago spp. (goldenrods), Arlsoema triphyllum (Jack In the pulpit), Ru6u5 sp.
(blackberry), Rosa multiflora (multiflora rose), Dryopteris Intermedia (Intermediate woodfern) and additional
representatives of the family Asteracae. Due to the time of year the vegetation sampling took place It was
difficult to identify some taxa to the species level. A small, linear, (-1235 sq. ft.), offsite moist area was
delineated below an outlet pipe that exists along the tract up -valley of Highway 105,
4.4 Streams
One (1) stream feature Is located on the Subject Parcels (Appendix Q. The first order, perennial, stream is
referred to as Unnamed Tributary a (UTa), and Unnamed Tributary b (UTb). UTa is located up -slope of
Highway 105 and on the northwest side of NC Highway 105. UTa flows in a south and east direction but
turning flow direction to the southeast as it flows under NC Highway 105 to the southeast side (down slope)
of the highway continuing as UTb. The stream Is approximately 3-4 feet wide throughout the delineated
length, Bed material is a diverse mix of cobble. UTa supports in- channel woody debris and rooted upland
flora. UTb Is managed to waters edge through mechanical means. Rooted fibrous vegetation is present In
UTb. Benthlc sampling identified a single macro -invertebrate in the order Trichoptera (Cadd€sflies) .

APPENDIX A
Site Location Map

OBI 8081333' VI
081.8000000. W
081.7916666` W OB1.Y833333" W
031 7750000' VV
r
BBR Enterprises, LLC
O°
Wastewater Project
nob
m
o�
5
_
g
_
•
Mifl
-
-
-
Ridge.
z
z
-
/- giiR �rtNCr�S?S.. LLC
1'f11/7 S•11
f
rete�n
b,
1
1';
J
n
JULIAN Pit
M
j
O
f
1 I.
Zk �Vinue"'b�Y
�1
681.8083333' W 031.8000000' W
031.7916686` W OB 3. 7633333' W
OB1,7750000'iM
SCALE 1:24000
tope moo aoor, 4000 soon 6=
FEET

APPENDIX B
USDA/NRCS WEB SURVEY SOILS MAW

z
.- A.
'x i

z
E
LD
z a
IN'
r w E A ui ;= ❑ G raf
w
r
LU
13
rn

Custonn Soil Resource Report
Map Unit Legend
Map Unit symbol Mop Unit Namo - Acres in Act percent of AOI
CSC ! Cutlasale very cobbly loam, B to 1,7 40.6%
15 porcent elapes, very stony
Don kCelWood mbbly Randy loam, 1 2.6 61),4k
li# to 6 percent slopes. I
occaslonally flooded
iorala for Area of interest 4.3 i 100A%
Map Unit Descriptions
The map units delineated on the detailed soil, maps In a soil survey represent the
sofas or miscellaneous areas in the survey area. The map unit descriptions, along
with the maps, can be used to determine the', composition and properties of a unit
A map unit delineation on a soil map represents an area dominated by one or more
major kinds of soil or miscellaneous areas. A map unit is identified and named
according to the taxonomic classification of the dominant soils. lNithln a taxonomic
class there are precisely defined limfte for the properties of the soils. On the
landscape, however, the soils are natural phenomena, and they have the
characteristic variability of all natural phenomena. Thus, the range of some
observed properties may extend beyond the limits defined for a taxonomic class.
Areas of sails of a single taxonomic class rarely, If ever, can be mapped without
Including areas of other taxonomic classes, Consequently, every map unit is made
up of the soils or miscellaneous areas for which It is named and some minor
components that belong to taxonomlc classes; outer than those of the major soils.
Most minor sails have properties slmflar to those of the dominant soil or soils In the
map unit, and thus they do not affect use and management, These are tailed
noncontreating, or similar, components. They may or may not be mentioned In a
partfcufar map unit description. Other minor components, however, have properties
and behavioral characteriatks divergent enough to affect use or to require different
management. These are called contrasting, or dlsslmilar, components. They
generally are In small areas and could not be trapped separately because of the
scale used. Some small areas of strongly contrasting soils or miscellaneous areas
are Identified by a special symbol on the maps. If included In the database for a
givon area, the contrasting minor components, are Identified in the map unit
descriptions along with some characteristics of each. A few areas of minor
components may not have been observed, and consequently they are not
mentioned In the descriptions, especially where the pattern was so complex that it
was impractical to make enough observations to Identify all the soils and
miscellaneous areas on the landscape,
The presence of minor components in a map unit In no way diminishes the
usefulness or accuracy of the data. The objective of mapping is not to delineate
pure taxonomic classes but rather to separate the landscape, Into landforms or
fand£orm segments that have similar use and management requirements, The
delineation of such segments on the map provides sufficient information for the

Custom Soil Resource Report
development of resource plans. If Intensive use of small areas is planned, however,
onslte Investigation Is needed to define and locate the soils and miscellaneous
areas.
An identifying symbol precedes the map unit name in the map unit descriptions.
Each description Includes general facts about the unit and gives important soil
properties and qualities.
Soils that have profiles that are almost alike make up a soli series. Except for
differences In texture of the surface layer, all,the soils of a series have major
horizons that are similar In composllion, thickness, and arrangement.
Sails of one series can differ in texture of the surface layer, slope, stoniness,
salinity, degree of erosion, and other characteristics that affect their use. On the
basis of such differences, a sail series Is divided into soil phases. Most of the areas
shown on the detailed soil maps are phases of soil aeries. The name of a soil phase
commonly Indicates a feature that affects use or management. For example, Alpha
silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is a phase of, the Alpha series.
Some map units are made up of two or more major soils or miscellaneous areas.
These map units are complexes, associations, or undifferentiated groups.
A complex consists oftwo or more soils or miscellaneous areas In such an Intricate
pattern or In such small areas that they cannot be shown separately on the maps.
The pattern and proportion of the sails or miscellaneous areas are somewhat similar
In all areas. Alpha -Beta complex, 0 to 6 percent slopes, is an example.
An association Is made up of two or more geographically associated soils or
miscellaneous areas that are shown as one unit on the maps. Because of present
or anticipated uses of the map units in the suirvey area. It was not considered
practical or necessary to map the soils or miscellaneous areas separately. The
pattern and relative proportion of the soils or miscellaneous areas are somewhat
similar. Alpha -Beta association, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is an example,
An undiffarendated group is made up of two or more soils or miscellaneous areas
that could be mapped Individually but are mapped as one unit because similar
interpretations can be made for use and management. The pattern and proportion
of the soils or miscellaneous areas In a mapped area are not uniform. An area can
be made up of only one of the major soils or ml,acellaneous areas, or it can be made
up of all of them. Alpha and Beta soils, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is an example.
Some surveys Include miscWtaneous areas. Such areas have littie or no soil
material and support little or no vegetation. Rack outcrop Is an example.

Custom Soli Resource Report
Watauga County, North Carolina
CsC—Cullasaja very cobbly loam, 8 to 16 percent slopes, very stony
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: ix5c
Elevation: 1,500 to 4,600 feet
Mean annual precipllotion: 40 to 80 Inches
Mean annual air temperature: 46 to 57 degrees F
Ftust-frea period. 100 to 150 days
Farmland dassiffoation: Not prima farmland
Map Unit Composition
CulMsala, very stony, and similarsoils: 85 percent
Estlmates are based on observations, descriptions, and hansects of the mapunit.
Description of Cullasala, Very Stony
Setting
Landfomr: Coves on mountain slopes, drainageways on mountain slopes, fans on
mountain slopes
Landform position (two-dlmensionalj: Footstope, toealape
Landform position (threa•dimansfonsJ}: Mountalnbass, bass slope
Down -slope shapa: Concave
Across -slope shape: Concave
Parent material: Cobbly and stony coliuvlum derived from igneous and
metamorphic rack
Typical profile
A - 0 to 11 Inches: very cobbly loam
Bw- 11 to 60lnches: very cobbly loam
Properties and qualities
Slope: 8 to 15 percent
Percent of area covered with surface fragments: 1.$ percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Natural drainage class: Well drained
Runoff class: Low
Capacity of the most fimillng laorto transmit water (Ksat): Nigh (1.98 to 5.95
Inlhr)
Depth to water table: More than. 80 inches
Frequancyofffooding: Nona
Frequancyofponding: None
Available water storage in profile: Low (about 5.6 Inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (Irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonitrigated): 6s
Hydrologic Soil Group: A
Hydric soil rating: No
10

Custom Sail Resource Report
DeB—Bellwood cobbly sandy loam, 1 to 5 percent slopes, occasionally
flooded
Map Unit Setting
Natlonal map unit symbol: ks74
Elevation: 1,200 to 2,000 feet
Mean annual precipitaflon: 45 to 70 Inches
Mean annual s1r temperature: 46 to 57 degrees F
Frost -free pedcaf 116 to 170 days
Farmland classification: Farmland of local Importance
Map Unit composition
Dogwood, occasionally flooded, and similar soils: 90 percent
Minor components: 5 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mopunit,
Description of Dellwood, Occasionally Flooded
Solving
Landform: Flood plains
Down -slope shape: Linear
Across -slope shape: Convex
Parent material: Gravelly and gobbly sandy alluvium
Typical profile
Ap - 0 to 8 inches: cobbly sandy loam
A - 8 to 16 inches: extremely gravelly sand
C - 1610 80lnchos: extremely gravelly coarse sand
Proporiles and qualities
Slope: 1 to 5 percent
Depth to restriotive feature., 8 to 20 inches to strongly contrasting textural
stratificallon
Natural drainage class: Moderately well drained
Runoffcless: Very low
Capacity of the most 8miflng layorto tmnsmff water (Ksat): High (1.98 to 5,95
In/fir)
Depth to water table: About 24 to48 inches
Prequenoyofflooding; Occaslonal
Frequencyofponding: None
Available water storage In profile: Very low (about 1,1 Inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 3s
Hydrologic Soil Group: B
Nydric soft rating: No

Custom Sall Resource Report
Minor Components
Nlkwasi, undralned
Percent of mep unit: 5 percent
Landform: Depressions on flood plains
Down -slope shape: Concave, linear
Across -slope shape: Concave
Hydric soil retingr Yes

Efflueht
NPIDES: PERMIT NO. _ N=3769 Olsoharp No _ _ _001
Padlhy Named ANIIA Mill F'aslival UVYVT.
Operator In Responelble ChEslge (ORO):
C"odLaboratory (1): W—aja Tech
CHECK BOX IF ORO HAS CHAHGED
I= PERSON(5
Mall ORIGINAL and ONE COPY to
X
ATTN: CENTRAL FILES
(SIGNATURE- OF I
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
BY THS HIRNATURE,1
IOU MAIL 8KRMCE CENTER
ACCURATs ANDOOMF
RAWOK NO 2NOO-1011
MOO: January Years - . 2011
class: it Ownly: —,— Wn&re-
farads II ... phone 76A 499-F?4tl4
(2)
;0i,bONG SAMPLES Operators r
FY THAT THIS REPORT M
TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE.
MIMI
OWN
among
EaRMOd0000
�1001000001
NONE
on
IMEMEMINOMM
NOUN
Nona
�
�m"0����������
wii
MINE
INUMEM
���NMIMN
NONE

NPOESPORMITNO.
FaWRY Name: hm
Operator in Responsible Charge
CertNed Laboratory i1fi ,!Qi!
OHEOKBOX IP ORO HA3 ORANG90
VlscharOallo,-.----9D4Month: Fabruaru .. Yew. ' 2bi4_
rsIWWTP Class: It County: _ _ _maddadwo—
_ ..- Qrada: � _ Phone: - 7,QM4&94049AD4
(2? -
© PERSON( I COLLECTWO SAMPLES Operators
a r
c ♦ a•
•- -iy •e
�.
RW�aLL1'i T
���iL".i3��L7
L'LmLLJLL'fL7�a11d1'>iR:r"Su�:1.7
m m mmR'f�l'!a
mm-m-�-�
©m-®
mp�
�
�mmlmm�mm_
"m="iSl•mm
m
I��i-��
m �n � �r ems
®�
e�rrrr
� i■�■
� ■�
��s
�
®ran���m��■rr�
�r��srr�
_
©�ir������rrw�a■w��r�r���rs
L'8+"Yl'J imam
=idA��®®�_

Effluent
NPI9ES PERMIT NO. _-- - N00=109 rXecharge Na: gQ Month: AAph_ _ _. ... Year: 2014_ - -
Faolli(y Name: Mint HAI Festival wwTP Class: - 11 Courdr. Mecklei]t]u[g
Operator In Responsible Charge (ORO): - Grade: 8 Pb j% 7 i-A -94b4
CartMed Laboratm (1); r I o (2}
ON90K EOX 1F ORO HAS ONAN060 1M PERSOperators
Mall ORIGINAL and ONE COPY to X \�
ATTN; CENTRAL PILES {81GNATURE OF O $RA 11N RES 0 I LE CHARGE) OAT
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY BYTH79alONATUR9,I0 RTIF1•TNAFTHIeRBPORTIa
1917MAIL SERVICE CENTLR ADCURATEANDOOMA TETOTHERMOFMYIINOWI.RDOE
RALEIGH, NC 27699+1317
3
30060 DOD10 00400 80080 ooma
F1,OW
L
L" Oi p
!NF 0
tY'
mlo emol Blois
OD000
00000
L'IL
[ll
!!lggq
BNTRRPAWAffMRCODeABOVE
NAME AND (Wn HELM
HRe
HR& WRIM Mod OC 1 UNITS I UWL I M01
Moll I MWL f11001141.
rton.
MtK
I MG&
1
4.007
2
p,ODD
'
9
12661
0.8 1 B 01006 f0
a
194$
A 1 0 a004 7
$
139$
1 @ 4200 7 74<20
19A
a
t91a
1 I a moo 7 216
<0,2 4a8 41
7
1970
1 @ 0.021 tl 40
3
0.010
B
0.009
14
191E
9 B 0.007 1t
91
1130
1 a 0.0m 10 7.a 00
D,9
12
i136
9 @ 0.008 13 4.4
sv0.2 10.0 of
93
1230
!
10.
1246
1 9 0,007 14 e20
99
0.007
6
0,013
17
14$
1 a 0.012 10
99
9120
1 a 01010 0 7.7 e20
11.0
10
1126
D.6 n 0.009 0 40 $.7
40.2 �h e1
20
1230
1 @ a000 1 10
21
1496
1 S 0,007 1 11
22
0.008
#
29
D--wo -
24
13$0
-
1 a 0.0as 99
28
ilia
1 0 0.001 10
20
11Pa
2 a 0,006 a �20 2,8
KA2 Va ,l
27
1410
1 S 0.007 D 7A 420
11,4
26
140D
9 a 0.007 11
20
0 00D
30
0.000
31
1480
1 B OM7 93
AVERAOS
OA09 90
0.00 7,,
1
f0.0
MNUMUM 0.021 13 7.7 Ct0 8.7
4.2 10[0
R1
11.9
MINIMUM coo$ 6 1.3 40 2,8
' 0.2 6,
e1
Cm . q G 4 G a
C d
d
q
q
R
M IAnN 0 sta NL 0 10.1)
4.0 ea 200
N
NL
rwv mmdmum 17 1&0
20.0 46.
400
�a.0

Effluent
NPDES PERMIT NO. NCM63789
Discharge No..,Q
Facility Name: Mint Hill Fast1V8I WWrP
operator In FRosponaiblo charge (ORC).
Certified Laborelory (1): WaterTQch Laba
Inc
CHECK BOX W Oft HAS GIIANaeO
I= PEASCD
MaN ORIGINAL and ONE COPY lo:
X
ATTN: QERTRAL FILES
(SIGNATURE 0
DIVI814N OF WATER WALITY
9Y VI8 SIONATUR
181T MAIL 8 ERVICE CENTER
ACCURATBANO Cc
RALEIGH, NC R1899.1817
Month: AM Yew. 0
Cues:-_____If_County: �na�
Grade: . II p
SAMPLES Ongretors
'erlm //t/
I CERTIFY TNAT Till& REPORT 16
PLEfE TO THE BeaT OF MY KNOWLwas,
MOMr11 if li , 11: i ,�
h
If kV
11:11
■
mr�mImLmm
o�mom
®mmwr��ir�■mi■w�■irrrwr�
mmma,:
mmrww
�r■ww�■�
amm"=mmmwrmm�wr�■■��w�■wir�rwr
mmw
� f1: ®w
rr■�inw�rmww�w�w.r
m=wm,
r■r'ww�■■�ww�w�rw�r�
oww�r
f 11! wr�rwrl�wlwriwrw�rr
dmra�o�miwrrr��■u�rw�m�wNr�rr■w�
mwo
mwww�w�w�m
MEw.w•w•
Im0
m=
;;;�
i�irrIrMEr�r■�i�
s�rw�■■r
„ ww
ww■wwiwMM1r�w■
�mwwwur■■IMEMMUM
�■rrwtMMEM
■�■w�r
mm
■wrr■wr
MIM
os
11m.a■"
, f,, m........�w11M
s
mm
mww�■■r�r■w�w
N..w...r,.�
M1iwrrww
mwww�rmwrw�rww�r�iw�
�w=M
1= wmw��■■��■�wrrrw
m
amdImm
irw�ii�r
11■�
m©mw�,til�r�r�rw�i■r�i�
mwr
210111
u�■�
�wsw�rr
r
mmow
1 !!: m
e�r�ww�u■�rw
i
omor
Emnamw■wsru�
�■■ww■r�r�r
m�mm�wmw�■�rM�r
orw■w�w■�wwi■
®
mw�wriwrr�r��r■M�rrrw�ww�ww
m�
A�mmw�w�wn��ri�iw���■�iiwrii�rir
,
■mow
1Vi: mmwe��r�mw_ww��iw�r

NPDES PERMIT N(
Facitfty Name; MI
Operator In Responsible Ch erg
Cepiffled Laboratory {1): W
CHEOR BOX IF ORO rfAS CHANGED
Mall ORIGINAL and ONE COPY V
ATTNr CENTRAL FILL-8
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
1017 MAIL SERVICE OWER
RALEIGH, NO 2789DA017
Effluent
Discharge No., 001 momti;--9ev__ _ , Year: 2914
valYlflM1rIA Class: 11 Counly: - MAddtI
Grade: TIl phsrne,_.7f14489.9A0A
Operators
9YTHIS SIGNATURE..UE T9FY"TTwill REPORTIS
A"URATR ANDCOMPILE ETWME DEST OR W NNOWLEVaP.
•
•
.,.,lti.!�1._Y� I�MM����+'�•��
®A
IW>LJ r y
Ij
In � 1
�
11' 1 I
11 : 1 I
11::.
���
}
L
n
�AJr•:iW
t 1 ����
1.i1�::L7�Rui:a1-7®
���
�l�llll�l•I��
1 11 �
���
����
�=����
mi�l�0
©ill
�
ONE
1 11: Il�lii�

Effluent
NPDES PERMIT NO, MCCO63789 Discharge No,: 001 Manih: Jyr�Year;
Faclllly Name; Mint Bill Festival NlWTP �— CIBDs; - County
Operator In Responsible Charge (ORC): _ Grade: „ „ II T� p
Cerfilied Labaralory(1): Ydtller Tech Labs ino _ (2)
CHGcA BOX IF ORC NAB CnANOED / PER$ •. COLLECTING SAMPLES _ OaerBlors
Mei=ORIGINALandONLCOPYlo: ); •,,�. %r/1
OilTH: CENTRAL FILES (BIGNATI1l<C OF OP TOR IN RESIK'14>SIALE CHARGE)
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY 1 BYTHIBSIGNATURL� tCfTIPYTIfA7THIS REPORT IS l,1
'1017 MAIL SERVICE CENTER ACCURATE AND COM Eft T* THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE,
RALEIGH, NC 270a0.1017
o
y
a
LOT%
'
60060 00010 00400
FLbW W
EFF 1wI N T
INS
50C•5D DD310 D08 D
p
P C1'
G°_'
OO630
3i816
00300
098tlD
00684
$ Pyy
Q
SNTSR PARAMETEn CODE ABOYE
NAMEANO UNITs BELOW
HRS
HR9
YIR;N
I MOD OC
UNITS
VQ&
MWL
MGrII
I MG1L
(040ML
MG&
MG/L
I JAWL
1
D.00p
l
2
1216
1
a
0,4108 22
0
1120
2
a
0,006 21
<20
4
1120
1
B
O.DDB 22
6X
420
42,0
4D.2
42.e
41
6,9
• 6
1160
1
B
DAD$ 20
8
1210
1
B
01007
23
Y
D,ptls
. s
aolD
0
12,15
2
B
0.0D8
24
10
Ills
2
B
0.008
25
420
11
1126
2
B
0.000
28
7.0
420
<2.0
1 <0.2
12A
41
7.7
12
1006
2
0
01010
26
13
1400
-1 ..
13
0.009
24
14
0.003
16
D,Das
18
1710
1
a
0009
25
17
1126
1
D
0,007
25
420
_
18
1120
1
B
NODS
20
0.1
420
4.0
_
40.2
42.0
41
9.2
_
0
lt40
1
B
0.000
26
_
20
0630
2
D
0.000
75
21
0,009
22
0,0i0
23
1230
1
B
ODDS
26
24
112D
1
B
0,006
26
<2p
26
112E
1 T
B
D,D00
2e
9.2
<20
42,0
40,2
42.6
<1
0.6
26
1340
1
D
D.008
28
_27
1818
1
B
_0,014
27
2e
D,000
00
137D
l
B
0.006
20
91
AVERAGE
MAXIMUM
O,pBe
QW4
28
27
9.2
0
00
0.0
<2.0
0.00
<0,2
OA 1 8.3�
8.0
MINIMUM
0,007
21
7.4
Qr
<2.0
40.2
42.6
41
7.7
eom . ClGrab Gj
G
Q
B
C
C_
C
0
_
MonlhA�+Amil
1
0,0860
NI
s!0
0.0
2.0
00.0
200
- NL
f1L
Ddy Msxh,am __
_
_
1 1
_40D
>s.D

.wa
Effluent
NPDES PERM17 NO, NCOM37S8 olacharge No,: A01
Paciply Now. . Mlnt HIII Poollvnl WWTP
Operalor in Re9ponallale Charge (ORC): .
CorUlled Lahoratory (1); W t_aC Tech Labe ln0
GHRCX BOX IF ORG HAS CHANGED PERSONS)
A /r - L.
July yaw, 203A
�-11 Counly: ManLLanh,ir
II PhmQL- ZQ4.409-0404
SAMPLES _ aperelorc-- ��
Mail ORIGINAL and ONE COPY to;
ATTN:OONTRAL XILUS
DIVISION OF WATER QUALRY
161YVAILSERVICECONTER
itALEIbH,HC 87998�f817
X
�
{ 10 TORE O F oPE
13Y Me WONATURF. I CEU
ACCURATE ANDRomPum
i
GS 3
OR IN RESPONSIBLE CHAROQ
IV YNAY WID,REPORT 18
rQTHEBEST OFMYKNOWW00%
DATE
60060 00D10 DOW SOD041 003f0 00010
011
80 1 31018
100300 ON06 00006
PLQW
EFF IN Ss ' p
INF 0 �X
..
EMRPARAMETORCODE AOOVE
MWANDU"TMOELOW
Has HRS 118
ASWD''
`06
u11 lJOIL
MWL
Mal-L
UliaO�IL MqR '1�10D A34VL'
l
11id' 1 8
d:D'osE'
2D" .
a
7120 f B
i aDO
27
,0
1 <2Q'
r2,0
40.2
6
5
1400 1 E
4.000
28
4
<talldk
O.tlU6
.
6
'0.000
8
009
7
1440 1 1 Y
0.009
2a
f
0
1116 1 Y
0.000
2a
r20
1)
_LLD 2 Y
0,00a
20
7.7
<0
2, 0'
<0,2
c4
<1
BA
10
late 2 V
0,000
28
11
1460 1 Y ,
D,D10
20
'
12
0,008
13
DAia
14
.1320 1 Y
0,009
27
16
1210 2 Y
0.010
27
r2O
18
1W 2 Y
0.000
20
7.9
d0
r2,0
*.2
42.
<1
8.2
17
1260 1 Y
0,000
20
19
1406 1 Y
OADB
20.
'
10
0.100
20
0.009
21
7330 1 Y
0.014
24
22
1125 2 V
0.00
24
r20
23
1190 . 2 V
0.000
20.
to
-zu
4.2
4.8
<l
0.6
24
1246 2 Y
0,000•
26
20
1400 2 Y
OAOY
29,
26
amoo
27
D.OfO
29
,010
27
'
2B
0,048
24a0
0.007
24
6,0
<2D
+2,0
<0.2
4.3
<1
0.6
31
VVERAGED.02
,011
24D.012
20
0
G.0
0.00
1.7
0.2
.100
28
&0
t20
r2.0
e0,2
43
.
G1
0.6
.008
24
7.7
<20
G2,0
iO.2
r2.6
ri
8.0
comp, C mh f3
0
, 13
G
C
O
C
i3
p C tl
MalOh 0mR 0.0366
NL
am
6.0
2A
80.0
200
NL NIL
Oai MmdmOm I I
1
17
7,61.
10.0 1
44.0
1qp0
a84

E lUetit
NFOES P5RM1[T NO, _____f%C
t%trvlllly Narm, li
Operatorin R69p Ie Gharp
Cerillfed Laboratory (1): .iA'r.
CHS:OX BOX IF Oita HAS CHANGED
Mall ORIGINAf and ONE COPY to:
ATTN: CENTRAL FILES
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
1617 MAIL SERVICE CENTER
NALEioH, NO 21600.1017
Month: Auggat Year: ZQ14
Clara: U Counly: _--Macklenbiv-
Grade: it p
_ aperalors ��
9Y THIS SIGNATUREIr dERTIFY THAT THIe REFORT IS
ACCURATL AND GOMAI.�T6 TO THE BEET QF MY HNOWLV DMS.
�i1�C,tl
�a1FF7A
1flJ:iikllf .E 1 �.`1��ii�:L`=1a{[i�l:i1�R'L1i�171
j1�1�.iL7�G:YSi'1�i13�1S�]%/�L:L�1�4i=�71�®
rem
zar�r■■■■���

NPDES PERMIT NO. _ ....%
F8011Ry mama: _ MI
Operator In Responsible Oherge
CeNIWed Laborelory (1): ,L
CH40K BOX 3F ORC HAS CHANGED
MaH ORIGINAL end ONE COPY to:
MTN3 CENTRAL FILE$
DIVIMN OF WATER WALITY
1617 MAIL SERVICE CENTER
RALEIOIi, NO 21000d617
Effluent
DWhpgeNo: Month: SarrtembeT Year: 1
ValIARNmp Class: - A Counly: .n�aeti�enhucg_
31�t/ gttoyaU Grade: It ♦phone 70448rd 94t74
CM PERSQIV(S){COLf_EGTING SAMPLES Operators
X
{SIGNATURE 010
F QIt71F E TOR IN RESPON IBL CF
BY TIRI eN3NATURR, I e "WATTHW&PORT le
ACCURATEAMDOOMPL 7E707rmm'r6FMYKNOWId!A0I3,
a
a'L'l1arrS
L1l'lLlMMIM 'm
MOM
it i h
Il
a
+
r,
>Utif
a
°I
�saurr.re.rxui7lEivatlsw:iaiiuur��
mmum
MIM
om,mm
'
m�■r��iirIMMOMMm.mm
mmmm�m
� �IMIM
OMME
Ommm
' Mmmm
IMMMMV�
m•
mmmmlommmmm
MOM
mmmmm
MW
Big"�
mm3mmmimmm
�mo
�m��mmmmmtm�m
mmimi
gym•
mmm"Immm
m ��€m�■�
��
mmmmR�mm
m�mE�mmm��mM
mmmmramm■MmMmM11M
r
�■��■�w�
mim
Rm
lima
mmm0MImmmimE
m=R'=
MNMMM��rmrt�w
mW"mm
m m y man
mmm�m�m�
mmmmommm
mmIMMI
■�■■
mmd
'r■�m•�r�■rw
mm
mrmmIM�■rm��m
esmm
mmMmm�iiMIMMIm��mi�
mmm�
.II!
�■
mimmma
m�m♦�
"M
111��=m
-m
_--_
mmmm
fmmmmmv
mEms
m9mm"
�immw
mm
mm;smr�mmmmm�u
mm����w■
�mrmmmramrMEmmm■u�m�=mmrmrr�
miRm"mram
mommm iiiiu�wr=�m�r■�w�
fmmmmrmmmmm
�mmm•m•mi�
mmmmmtm�■m�m�■■w
mm
MN
� m��mmm�mr
mmm0�mi�■�■

Effluent
NPDES PERMIT NO. NCOg�3 a' Dlsohorge Na,,. pg j,_ MonOal th; obar. . .Year.: 0
Fealllty Name:. Mlnt H II o'611vat_IRWTb I Class. —1L-Caunty: .—...---..Meaklonburg-
Operator In Responstsle Charge (ORO): Gla n a. QWYRY `T Oracle 11_ _ Plk> I W -481MQ
Certlfled1,6orslory (1): Water'Tenh Labs Ina (2)
CHECK BOX IF ORO HAS CNANLGGb PE R,40N( ) COLLECTING SAMPLES. Operators
Mall ORIGINAL and ONE COPY to: X j' 1
ATTH! CENTRAL FILES (S NATURE OF PERA R IN RESPONSIBLE CHARGE) DATE
DIWI)ION OF WATER QUALITY HYTW61ONATi1RE, OkiiTIFYTIrgTTNf9013FONTIs
1517 MAIL SERVICE CENTER ACCURATRANOCON Ltl7ETOTNae69lCpM1iWUWLLCd2
IRALUIGH, NO 270904017
Jim
,.,. rmLi��nm
,.„
,,:,,■m�.v
Jim
y
rr
j
a
�'
�RJ1+Ly�mmMIJ::iilt
an
wx
Kmmm
E
rmmmmrrl•mMwr
y
m
mm-�mm
mmmlmmmm�m♦�m♦
mi:l'JJ�d:ammmmmmm���
mmmomsnrmmmm
m�_m_Im�m♦m�
i!C'fimmilLll:,tamm
m
�1�11MM
nrmcmm�rs�
,,�rr��r®®'

f 1
Effiuent
A fFF NO. "CO0037B9
VsohaMo Nm: Mj
AN, m lot HUI FaStivnl WWTP
.r In Responsible Charge {ORC}:
,ed Laboratory (1): Water Dog
IBg�_
.CK BOX IP ORO HAS CHM0140
PER5ON{9
Mall ORIGINAL and ONE COPY to:
X
ATTNr CENTRAL FILRB
81ONATU 0 OF pl
UIVisION OF WATER QUAL. TY
aY MO SIONATURE,1 ai
MY MAIL SIUMC9 CENTER
AOCURATQ ANO COMM
RALEIQHI NC 2YO0461T
NomWimm _ Year: 20114 .. , .
rl_ - County; Meckl��,h. ,_uro—
_ II Pbaoe. 704•dR8.94t14B�itl4
(2)
TING SAMPLES Ooeralors
THAT THIS RVORT la
THM NOT OF MY KNOWLADGIII.
YIIrN
-
i
, e
, � �log
MEN
flltl+slM
M3
�
L'
�L`T,L�
`1.
lot1
mmmmmmmm
"gn
"
��iii■r�
111:
"ro©m
1 r 1
umlmwmmmmmm
man
mwmmm���=fir
I li©0
WIN
mwm
m
=M■■■�wr�■�w��w
am
=am
vm�
m���■�
M
M
�momMM
�
����-

Effluent
NPIDES PERMIT NO, N00003789 Woharg'a No.: 201 Month: Year.
Fao!!Ky Name: _ Mlnt HOf fT Lvhl91IWTP ... _. . - Class: County: ____mwklenbur0_
Operator In Responsible Ohar$e (ORC): G II Grade: 11 Phons:. 704-A&94at
Carifllefi Laboratory (1): Waler T (2)
omeuli Box IP RRC HAS ONANOW [:3 PERSON($) COLLE TING SAMPLE$ O erators
Mall ORIGINAL and ONE COPY to; X
ATTN; 4911rRAL FI1.E3 (3 A R9 OF O E TOR IN RESPONSIBLE CHARGE) .'DATE
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY BYTH13SlaNATllRE,IC RTiFY7HATiNI$REPARTIa
1617 MAIL SERVIUE CENTER AOCGRATO AND COMPL T-Yp 1YIB Ba -rOp MY KNOWLHP0F.
RALE10H, NO 27899-1647
y ,
��■-'
a
■�y•�y�y�
rL•iLlli:Af:.L`:L7y71`:L7
�Ly.y��yiy�uly:Jiy
"m
mmm>rmmMIMMI
MOM
MW!
IMMIMM
ME
IMIMMM
m�mm�r
,,,:
�nrmw�mmu��mm��■i■�
oe�m>QmmmmmMIMIMMmmM��r
mmd■r�mmmo
mmw
mm
ME
mmmm
mmmm>•MMOMMMEM
EMM■
®m"=vn"mM
AMMMIM
r
MEmr
■mrmMm
mmw
m,mi■rNMr
ME
MM
m
F
mm�cw
rerrr�w�r�
m+��M■m
se�r�m�
; ;::
mm
■wmu��■N■wmCimw�lm��
mmma�■mi�rmu�rw■�
"MM�1�
mm�>mt
mmmi■�rmi�■>•la�wrm�m�wmMm•�
m�mrms�r�nmoti■�rmm�■�m�mm����■■�
mmmm�mmc�mm�m�mm�m��m•
mmm�ar
mmmme��mmmmrm•mrEM
mm
oMMMMIMUMMIM
m
�
m�r�■�r
, ,,: 1�■�w�rmml.■�im.ml��a�rmrl�w
mms�rt��mmmr■rrm�r�mm�m�■�r
m•
m�rmm'��mrmm�■■���mrmmmrm•�i■im•
mmo©
, , ,
mmmmm�■�m
■■■m•m•mr
m
omra��ma
MEME
rmrme
IMEMEM
gym•
r�mm�r�rm
mMOMME
mmomm��mm�ME
■i�i
�mmrr��rmm�m,rrm
ME�■■rrm■
,:
�mmmm»mrm�rm��m•�

Effluent
RMIT NO. NCW6378D
D1pohgrge No,;QD1
AMD: MR Rill Pastivai VmTP
.t In Respomlbla Charge (ORC):
Glen A t:W
ad L"raiary (1): 1Ngler Tooh La
_
JK 5OX IF 0110 HAS CIIAN1300
Mail bRIGIW'ond ONE CQPY, W: ,
X
ATTNI CENTRAL FILES
(6 [3NATURE CIF OI
DIV1310H 0P WATER QUALITY
BY TFRS SIONATURE,10
10711WL SMAW GANTOK
ACCURATBAND OOTApI.
RALEIGH,NO 2Y6SS+IS17
JRRUaFV _,Year:
? Counip &OW44babucg_.
11 Pbotw' --- U d89�9A0d
REST 0P MY KNOWMGK
Y
YEWR
it
11
d
-
r
+
ji.
n
• � �...:
U1ti.J
0�4'1m�:�mm'mmrlmlmm��m��
mmm'SmA�m�.
KEm
m
'mm�
mmlm
dmmmmimmrmmml
mm�m•mr�
O9mAOmmmmmmrm�mmmr���;
Omm�i
, rr:
R�mR�mmmlm�mmmrm�
MKM
m�,
©mmm•m•mKMmmmmmmmmmmm�mImm0mommmmmmm
mw=xvm�
mmm�mr
mmmm
r r I
mm--��
mmmm�mmm�a��mmmN��mr,
m"M
m
�®...�..
m �mmm.�m•Im�
mm'mM�
�mm
ffm�m
MMIE
�Il��!1mR�l�mmma�m�mmm•�m•m��
mRC�d�7
l�
mt�mmf
m
mrm��mr
mrm��mmm�Aml�mm�ml��
��mm�dmrmmm�m�mmm��m�mr
�#
�d
'IC�7f���mm�m�mm�m•�m.
OEmm�Emm
fmmmmmm�'m�.MOM
m
mmmmm=mmmmm
mml
mm��mA�
WE
Emmm
m��im�mml�lC�7l�Am
m�mmm�m•��
mmm©�mmmlm/�
mtmmm�m�mw�
�
m
m
im��rrmr�
Im
m
mmmm2nmAm
mm
m��■
WNW-M,
, • 1
ma■
MEME

APPENDIX E
Stream Identification Data Forms (UT1a, UTlb)

NC DWO Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: 02/0612018
Project/Sita: BBR Enterprises
Latitude: 36,147289
Evaluator: Adam VYlliants Peter Smith
County: VYatauga
Longitude:-81.794049
Total Points:
Stream Determination (circle one)
Dther
Stream rs at least lnrermitient 31.75
Ephemeral Intermittent Perennial
e.g. Quad Name: Ufa
it 2 19 ar erznn+al it z 30'
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = 15
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1' Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2 Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
3 In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool. step -pool.
n ie- ool s uence
0
1
2
3
4, Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
5, Activelrelict Boodplain
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
';
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0;(
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
'1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0 5
.1
1 5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
11 Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes = 3
FI Flvdroloov !Subtotal = 9
12_ Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
13_ Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
14- Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
05
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.5
1
1,5
17- Soil -based evidence of high water labie7
No = 0
Yes =
C_ Bioloov rSubtotal = r.ro
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
20. Maerobenlhos mote diversity and abundance}
0
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
t_5
24 Amphibians
1 0
0.5
1
1.5
25, Algae
0
1 0,5
1 1
1.5
26. Watiand plants in streambed
j
FACW = 0.75; GEL = 15 Other = 0
'perennial streams may also tie identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual
Notes:
Sketch:

Nf'. nWCI Stranrn idpntifirntinn Form 1lnrcinn 4.11
Date: 02/06120113
Project/Site; BBR Enterprises
Latitude: 36,147162
Evaluator: Adam Williams Peter Slnith
County Watauga
Longitude: _81.793060
Total Points:
Stream Determination (circle one)
Other
58eamiearleastrntermRtenr 20.25
Ephemeral intermittent Perennial
eg.Qua[I1Vame: UT I
i(� i9 or erennial it 2 3{)'
A. Geornor holo (Subtotal a 13.5
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1' Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
❑
'1
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex, rfle,peul, step pool,
r ie aol sequence
0
1
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
S. Activelrelict iloodplafn
0
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or tenches
0
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
1 0
1 1
2
3
9, Headcuts
0
1
2
3
B. Grade control
U
0"
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
1 0.5
1
1 1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes - 1
R , Hvdrolo❑v (Subtotal
12. Presence of Basetlow
0
1
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
❑
1
2
3
14. Leaf titter
1.5
1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
❑.5
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.5
1
1.6
17. Sail -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes = 3
C_ Rinlnnv f5uhintal = 5• /]
1 H. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
❑
1 a. Rooted upjand plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
20. Macrobenlhos (note diversity and abundance)
0
'T
2
3
21. Aquatic Mailusks
A
1
2
3
72. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
73. Cra ish
0
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
❑
11.5
1
1.5
25, Algae
n
❑.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW - 0.75; OBL - 1.5 Other= 0
'perennial streams may also be Identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual,
Notes:
Sketch:

APPENDIX F
Preliminary Jurisdictional Forms

Appendix 2 - PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (PJD) FORM
BACK(' INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR PJD: 2/6/2018
B, NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERSON REQUESTING PJD: Adam whams, PW,510565 HIphway 421 $outh Trade IN 37691
C. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER: Wilmington District - Asheville Office
D, PROJECT LOCATION(S) AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
(USE THE TABLE BELOW TO DOCUMENT MULTIPLE AQUATIC RESOURCES AND10R
AQUATIC RESOURCES AT DIFFERENT SITES)
State: NC County/parishlbarough, Watauga City: Flow!
Center coordinates of site (fat/long in degree decimal format):
Lat.: 36.146934 Long.:-81.191623
Universal Transverse Mercator;
Name of nearest waterbody: Watauga River
E. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
❑ Office (Desk) Determination. Date:
W Field Determination, Date(s); 2/6120/8
TA131.E OF AQUATIC RESOURCES IN REVIEW AREA WHICH "MAY BE" SUBJECT TO REGULATORY
JURISDICTION.
Site
number
Latitude
{decimal
degrees)
Longitude
(decline]
degrees)
Estimated amount
of aquatic resource
In review area
(acreage and linear
feet, if applicable)
Type cf aquatic
resource (i,e., wetland
vs, non -wetland
waters)
Geographic authority
to which the aquatic
resource "may be"
subject (i.e., Section
404 or Section 101404)
UTa
36.147289
-81.794049
-200 L.F
stream
404
UTb
36.147162
-81.793060
-100 LF
stream
404
W1
36.146934
-81,791623
0.093 aC
wetland
404

The Corps of Engineers believes that there may be Jurisdictional aquatic resources in
the review area, and the requestor of this PJ D is hereby advised of his or her option
to request and obtain an approved JD (AJD) for that review area based on an
Informed decision after having discussed the various types of JDs and their
characteristics and circumstances when they may be appropriate,
In any circumstance where a permit applicant obtains an Individual permit, or a
Nationwide General Permit (NWP) or other general permit verification requiring "pre -
construction notification" (PCN), or requests verification for a non -reporting NWP or
other general permit, and the permit applicant has not requested an AJD for the
activity, the permit applicant is hereby made aware that: (1) the permit applicant has
elected to seek a permit authorization based on a PJD, which does not make an
official determination of Jurisdictional aquatic resources; (2) the applicant has the
option to request an AJD before accepting the terms and conditions of the permit
authorizalion, and that basing a permit authorization on an AJD could possibly result
in less compensatory mitigation being required or different special conditions; (3) the
applicant has the right to request an individual permit rather than accepting the terms
and conditions of the NWP or other general permit authorization; (A) the applicant can
accept a permit authorization and thereby agree to comply with ail the terms and
conditions of that permit, including whatever mitigation requirements the Corps has
determined to be necessary; (5) undertaking any activity in reliance upon the subject
permit authorization without requesting an AJD constitutes the applicant's acceptance
of the use of the PJD; (6) accepting a permit authorization (e,g„ signing a proffered
individual permit) or undertaking any activity in reliance on any form or Corps permit
authorization based on a PJD constitutes agreement that all aquatic resources In the
review area affected In any way by that activity will be treated as jurisdictional, and
waives any challenge to such Jurisdiction in any administrative or judicial compliance
or enforcement action, or in any administrative appeal or in any Federal court; and Q)
whether the applicant elects to use either an AJD or a PJD, the JD will be processed
as soon as practicable. Further, an AJD, a proffered Individual permit (and all terms
and conditions contained therein), or individual permit denial can be administratively
appealed pursuant to 33 C.F.R. Part 331, If, during an administrative appeal, it
becomes appropriate to make an official determination whether geographic
jur€sdiction exists over aquatic resources in the review area, or to provide an official
delineation of jurisd€ctional aquatic resources in the review area, the Corps will
provide an AJD to accomplish that result, as soon as Is practicable. This PJD finds
that there may be"waters of the U.S. andlor that there "may be"navigable waters of
the U.S. on the subject review area, and Identifies all aquatic features in the review
area that could be affected by the proposed activity, based on the following
Information;

SUPPORTING DATA, Data reviewed for PJD (check all that apply)
Checked items should be Included in subject file, Appropriately reference sources
below whore indicated for all checked items:
[M-1 Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requester:
Map;USGS map, Appendix C JD Map
FW� Data sheets prepared/submitted by or oii behalf of the PJD requestor.
Office concurs with data sheetsldellneation report.
Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report, Rationale;
❑ Data sheets prepared by the Corps:
❑ Corps navigable waters' study; .._
❑ U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas:
❑ USGS NHD data,
❑ USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps,
U,S, Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name: Valle Cruc[s
❑ Natural Resources Conservation Service Sol[ Survey. Citation: _
❑ National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name: T
❑ State/local wetland Inventory map(s):
❑ FEMAIFIRM maps:
❑ 100•year Floodplaln Elevation is: —_.(National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929)
© Photographs: ® Aerial (Name & Date): S011s map w/ aerial
or Q Other (Name & Date); Photosheets
❑ Previous determimllon(s). File no, and date of response fetter: _
❑ Other information (please specify):
IMPORTANT NOTE: The inforrnation recardeil on this form has not necessarily
e n veriaed ky the QL)rl2§ aIjd should not be relied upon for later lurisdictional
determ[nations.
Signature and date of
Regulatory staff member
completing PJD
Adam W[Iliamsn;;,�ge
Signature and date of
person requesting PJD
(REQUIRED, unless obtaining
the signature is Impracticable) t
t Districts may eslablish timeframes for requestor to returrl signed PJD forms, If the requestor does not respond
within the established time frame, the district may presume concurrence and no additional follow up Is
necessary prior to finalizing an action.

APPENDIX G
Project Site Photosheets

Brushy Fork Environmental Consulting
BBR Enterprises, LLC WWTP Site
Site Photosheets
Photographed by BFEC on 02/06/2018, 02/08/2018,
02/15/2018

Photosheet 1
W1 soil core
WI Soil Core; auger reference

Photosheet2
f N,
W1 Habitat
01 soil core

Phatosheet 3
� 11 I.Ws
ly ASO
1k 4,
AwA,
ir
-.,i: : A i .ice
01 soil core: auger reference
01 habitat

Photosheet b
02 soil core
02 soil core; auger reference

Photosheet5
.1 .
t4l'
+i
MUTa stream channel

Photosheet 6
Piped stream outlet are SE side of NC Hwy 105
UTb stream charnel

1
5
� •� �Qf •�J" • r n � _��
Yam
o
rl� Dr
kw
VIr-
g LEGEND j
1, - . �� ,; : � .. r� „•?:._:_� .. _ - .._ .. - - — � I� Site Boundary
Drawing 1 '` USGS Topographic Map
USGS Topographic Map t. 4 Approximate 0.576-Acre Tract
Valley Crucis & Grandfather Mt -- Aldridge Road
NC Quadrangles F1��_��' ' Foscoe, Watauga County, NC
Scale: 1"=2,000' FIL0T ENVIK0NMENTAL.INC Pilot Project7372

i m•'

D
Drawing 2A
USDA Soil Survey
of Watauga County, NC
Published 2005, Sheet 24
Not to Scale
PILGI
P I L O T E N V I R 0 N M E N 7 A L. I N C
f
1
LEGEND
�# Site Boundary a
Published Soil Map
Approximate 0.576-Acre Tract
Aldridge Road
Foscoe, Watauga County, NC
Pilot Project 7372

I
sm
� i
i
G Gi. W ■ •
I
■ 4N
.,W I
- T LEGEND
+ Site Boundary
■ Freshwater Emergent
i i I Freshwater Forested/Shrub
P Estuarine and Marine Deepwate
Estuarine and Marine
Freshwater Pond
Lake
� ■ � Riverine
Other
NWI Map
Drawing 3
USFWS NWI Approximate 0.576-Acre Tract
Aldridge Road
Wetlands Mapper P11.131v A% -
Foscoe, Watauga County, NC
Scale: 1"=200' RIL0TENVIR0NMENTAL.INC Pilot Project7372

12
i
40
_�•L �* _
ir
4
rJ -
40
LEGEND
r, Site Boundary
0196.Annual Chance Flood Hazard
ORegulatory Floodvay
Sped al Floodvay
Area of Undetermined Flood Hazard
0.29(oAnnual Chance Flood Hazard
r' F tture Conditions 1 ''¢ Annual Chance Fl ood Hazard
PFArea with Reduced Risk Due to Levee
Drawing 4 FEMA FIRM
FEMA FIRM Panels i 3710560100J, 3710560000J, Approximate 0.576-Acre Tract
- -"
- Aldridge Road
3710561100J and 3710561000J, PILE) T ,w,
Foscoe, Watauga County, NC
Effective 11.5.08 PILOT ENVIRONMENTAL•INO Pilot Project7372
Scale: 1" = 2,000'

vfso-1 ax'unut't:
United States Department of the Interior
FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
Asheville Ecological Services Field Office
160 Zillicoa Street
Asheville, NC 28801-1082
Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
http://www.fws.p,ov/nc-es/es/countyfr.html
In Reply Refer To: November 03, 2021
Consultation Code: 04EN1000-2022-SLI-0072
Event Code: 04EN1000-2022-E-00198
Project Name: Clevon Woods WWTP
Subject: List of threatened and endangered species that may occur in your proposed project
location or may be affected by your proposed project
To Whom It May Concern:
The attached species list identifies threatened, endangered, proposed and candidate species, as
well as proposed and final designated critical habitat, that may occur within the boundary of your
proposed project and/or may be affected by your proposed project. Although not required by
section 7, many agencies request species lists to start the informal consultation process and begin
their fulfillment of the requirements under section 7(c) of the Endangered Species Act (Act) of
1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.).
This list, along with other helpful resources, is also available on the U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service (Service) —Asheville Field Office's (AFO) website: https://www.fws.gov/raleigh/species/
cntylist/nc counties.html. The AFO website list includes "species of concern" — species that
could potentially be placed on the federal list of threatened and endangered species in the future.
Also available are:
Design and Construction Recommendations
https://www.fws.gov/asheville/htmis/project review/Recommendations.html
Optimal Survey Times for Federally Listed Plants
https://www.fws.gov/nc-es/plant/plant survey.html
Northern long-eared bat Guidance
https://www.fws.gov/asheville/htmis/project review/NLEB in WNC.html
Predictive Habitat Model for Aquatic Species
https://www.fws.gov/asheville/htmls/Maxent/Maxent.html
New information based on updated surveys, changes in the abundance and distribution of
species, changed habitat conditions, or other factors could require modifications of these lists.

11/03/2021 Event Code: 04EN1000-2022-E-00198
Please note that under 50 CFR 402.12(e) of the regulations implementing section 7 of the Act,
the accuracy of the species lists should be verified after 90 days. This verification can be
completed formally or informally as desired. The Service recommends that verification be
completed by visiting the ECOS-IPaC website or the AFO website (the AFO website dates each
county list with the day of the most recent update/change) at regular intervals during project
planning and implementation for updates to species lists and information. An updated list may
be requested through the ECOS-IPaC system by completing the same process used to receive the
enclosed list or by going to the AFO website.
The purpose of the Act is to provide a means whereby threatened and endangered species and the
ecosystems upon which they depend may be conserved. Under sections 7(a)(1) and 7(a)(2) of
the Act and its implementing regulations (50 CFR 402 et seq.), Federal agencies are required to
utilize their authorities to carry out programs for the conservation of threatened and endangered
species and to determine whether projects may affect threatened and endangered species and/or
designated critical habitat.
A Biological Assessment is required for construction projects (or other undertakings having
similar physical impacts) that are major Federal actions significantly affecting the quality of the
human environment as defined in the National Environmental Policy Act (42 U.S.C. 4332(2)
(c)). For projects other than major construction activities, the Service suggests that a Biological
Evaluation similar to a Biological Assessment be prepared to determine whether the project may
affect listed or proposed species and/or designated or proposed critical habitat. Recommended
contents of a Biological Assessment are described at 50 CFR 402.12 and on our office's website
at https://www.fws.gov/ashevilleihtmis/project review/assessment guidance.html.
If a Federal agency (or their non-federal representative) determines, based on the Biological
Assessment or Biological Evaluation, that listed species and/or designated critical habitat may be
affected by the proposed project, the agency is required to consult with the Service pursuant to
50 CFR 402. In addition, the Service recommends that candidate species, proposed species, and
proposed critical habitat be addressed within the consultation. More information on the
regulations and procedures for section 7 consultation, including the role of permit or license
applicants, can be found in the "Endangered Species Consultation Handbook" at: http://
www.fws.gov/endangered/esa-library/pdf/TOC-GLOS.PDF.
Though the bald eagle is no longer protected under the Endangered Species Act, please be aware
that bald and golden eagles are protected under the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act (16
U.S.C. 668 et seq.), and projects affecting these species may require additional consultation (see
https://www.fws.gov/southeast/our-services/permits/eagles/). Wind energy projects should
follow the wind energy guidelines (http://www.fws.gov/windenergy/) for minimizing impacts to
migratory birds (including bald and golden eagles) and bats.
Guidance for minimizing impacts to migratory birds for projects including communications
towers (e.g., cellular, digital television, radio, and emergency broadcast) can be found at: http://
www.fws. gov/migratorybirds/CurrentBirdlssues/Hazards/towers/towers.htm;
http://www.towerkill.com; and http://www.fws.gov/migratorybirds/CurrentBirdlssues/Hazards/
towers/comtow.html.

11/03/2021 Event Code: 04EN1000-2022-E-00198
We appreciate your concern for threatened and endangered species. The Service encourages
Federal agencies to include conservation of threatened and endangered species into their project
planning to further the purposes of the Act. Please include the Consultation Tracking Number in
the header of this letter with any request for consultation or correspondence about your project
that you submit to our office.
Attachment(s):
■ Official Species List
• Migratory Birds
■ Wetlands

11/03/2021 Event Code: 04EN1000-2022-E-00198
Official Species List
This list is provided pursuant to Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act, and fulfills the
requirement for Federal agencies to "request of the Secretary of the Interior information whether
any species which is listed or proposed to be listed may be present in the area of a proposed
action".
This species list is provided by:
Asheville Ecological Services Field Office
160 Zillicoa Street
Asheville, NC 28801-1082
[phone]

11/03/2021 Event Code: 04EN1000-2022-E-00198
Project Summary
Consultation Code: 04EN1000-2022-SLI-0072
Event Code: Some(04EN1000-2022-E-00198)
Project Name: Clevon Woods WWTP
Project Type: WASTEWATER FACILITY
Project Description: The site is proposed for development with a wastewater treatment facility.
Project Location:
Approximate location of the project can be viewed in Google Maps: https://
www.google.com/maps/036.1467642,-81.79181698686007,14z
Counties: Watauga County, North Carolina

11/03/2021
Event Code: 04EN1000-2022-E-00198
Endangered Species Act Species
There is a total of 6 threatened, endangered, or candidate species on this species list.
Species on this list should be considered in an effects analysis for your project and could include
species that exist in another geographic area. For example, certain fish may appear on the species
list because a project could affect downstream species.
IPaC does not display listed species or critical habitats under the sole jurisdiction of NOAA
Fisheriesl, as USFWS does not have the authority to speak on behalf of NOAA and the
Department of Commerce.
See the "Critical habitats" section below for those critical habitats that lie wholly or partially
within your project area under this office's jurisdiction. Please contact the designated FWS office
if you have questions.
NOAA Fisheries, also known as the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), is an
office of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration within the Department of
Commerce.
Mammals
NAME
STATUS
Gray Bat Myotis grisescens
Endangered
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/6329
Northern Long-eared Bat Myotis septentrionalis
Threatened
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9045
Virginia Big -eared Bat Corynorhinus (=Plecotus) townsendii virginionus
Endangered
There is final critical habitat for this species. The location of the critical habitat is not available.
Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/8369
Reptiles
NAME
STATUS
Bog Turtle Clemmys muhlenbergii
Similarity of
Population: U.S.A. (GA, NC, SC, TN, VA)
Appearance
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
(Threatened)
Species profile: https://ecos.fws. ov/ecp/species/6962

11/03/2021 Event Code: 04EN1000-2022-E-00198 4
Insects
NAME
Monarch Butterfly Danaus plexippus
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9743
Flowering Plants
NAME
Heller's Blazingstar Liatris helleri
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/5962
STATUS
Candidate
STATUS
Threatened
Critical habitats
THERE ARE NO CRITICAL HABITATS WITHIN YOUR PROJECT AREA UNDER THIS OFFICE'S
JURISDICTION.

11/03/2021 Event Code: 04EN1000-2022-E-00198
Migratory Birds
Certain birds are protected under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act! and the Bald and Golden Eagle
Protection Act2.
Any person or organization who plans or conducts activities that may result in impacts to
migratory birds, eagles, and their habitats should follow appropriate regulations and consider
implementing appropriate conservation measures, as described below.
1. The Migratory Birds Treaty Act of 1918.
2. The Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act of 1940.
3. 50 C.F.R. Sec. 10.12 and 16 U.S.C. Sec. 668(a)
The birds listed below are birds of particular concern either because they occur on the USFWS
Birds of Conservation Concern (BCC) list or warrant special attention in your project location.
To learn more about the levels of concern for birds on your list and how this list is generated, see
the FAQ below. This is not a list of every bird you may find in this location, nor a guarantee that
every bird on this list will be found in your project area. To see exact locations of where birders
and the general public have sighted birds in and around your project area, visit the E-bird data
mapping tool (Tip: enter your location, desired date range and a species on your list). For
projects that occur off the Atlantic Coast, additional maps and models detailing the relative
occurrence and abundance of bird species on your list are available. Links to additional
information about Atlantic Coast birds, and other important information about your migratory
bird list, including how to properly interpret and use your migratory bird report, can be found
hPl nw_
For guidance on when to schedule activities or implement avoidance and minimization measures
to reduce impacts to migratory birds on your list, click on the PROBABILITY OF PRESENCE
SUMMARY at the top of your list to see when these birds are most likely to be present and
breeding in your project area.
NAME BREEDING SEASON
Bobolink Dolichonyx oryzivorus Breeds May 20 to
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental Jul 31
USA and Alaska.
Eastern Whip -poor -will Antrostomus voci ferus Breeds May 1 to
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental Aug 20
USA and Alaska.
Northern Saw -whet Owl Aegolius acadicus acadicus Breeds Mar 1 to Jul
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) only in particular Bird Conservation 31
Regions (BCRs) in the continental USA

11/03/2021
Event Code: 04EN1000-2022-E-00198
NAME
BREEDING SEASON
Prairie Warbler Dendroica discolor Breeds May 1 to Jul
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental 31
USA and Alaska.
Red-headed Woodpecker Melanerpes erythrocephalus Breeds May 10 to
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental Sep 10
USA and Alaska.
Rusty Blackbird Euphagus carolinus Breeds elsewhere
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) only in particular Bird Conservation
Regions (BCRs) in the continental USA
Wood Thrush Hylocichla mustelina Breeds May 10 to
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental Aug 31
USA and Alaska.
Probability Of Presence Summary
The graphs below provide our best understanding of when birds of concern are most likely to be
present in your project area. This information can be used to tailor and schedule your project
activities to avoid or minimize impacts to birds. Please make sure you read and understand the
FAQ "Proper Interpretation and Use of Your Migratory Bird Report" before using or attempting
to interpret this report.
Probability of Presence (■)
Each green bar represents the bird's relative probability of presence in the 10km grid cell(s) your
project overlaps during a particular week of the year. (A year is represented as 12 4-week
months.) A taller bar indicates a higher probability of species presence. The survey effort (see
below) can be used to establish a level of confidence in the presence score. One can have higher
confidence in the presence score if the corresponding survey effort is also high.
How is the probability of presence score calculated? The calculation is done in three steps:
The probability of presence for each week is calculated as the number of survey events in
the week where the species was detected divided by the total number of survey events for
that week. For example, if in week 12 there were 20 survey events and the Spotted Towhee
was found in 5 of them, the probability of presence of the Spotted Towhee in week 12 is
0.25.
2. To properly present the pattern of presence across the year, the relative probability of
presence is calculated. This is the probability of presence divided by the maximum
probability of presence across all weeks. For example, imagine the probability of presence
in week 20 for the Spotted Towhee is 0.05, and that the probability of presence at week 12
(0.25) is the maximum of any week of the year. The relative probability of presence on
week 12 is 0.25/0.25 = 1; at week 20 it is 0.05/0.25 = 0.2.
3. The relative probability of presence calculated in the previous step undergoes a statistical
conversion so that all possible values fall between 0 and 10, inclusive. This is the
probability of presence score.

11/03/2021 Event Code: 04EN1000-2022-E-00198 3
Breeding Season( )
Yellow bars denote a very liberal estimate of the time -frame inside which the bird breeds across
its entire range. If there are no yellow bars shown for a bird, it does not breed in your project
area.
Survey Effort (1)
Vertical black lines superimposed on probability of presence bars indicate the number of surveys
performed for that species in the 10km grid cell(s) your project area overlaps. The number of
surveys is expressed as a range, for example, 33 to 64 surveys.
No Data (—)
A week is marked as having no data if there were no survey events for that week.
Survey Timeframe
Surveys from only the last 10 years are used in order to ensure delivery of currently relevant
information. The exception to this is areas off the Atlantic coast, where bird returns are based on
all years of available data, since data in these areas is currently much more sparse.
'R probability of presence breeding season I survey effort — no data
SPECIES
JAN FEB MAR APR
MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
Bobolink
BCC Rangewide
- - - - - - - - - - - - -
+ + - - - - ---I - - - - - - - - - - -
(CON)
Eastern Whip -poor-
will
— — — — — — — — — — — — -
- - -
- - - -
- - - -
Jill Jill Jill III- - - - -
BCC Rangewide
(CON)
Northern Saw -whet
Owl
— — — -
- - - -Jill Jill
- - - -
- - - -
- - -
- - - -
Jill Jill Jill - - - -
BCC -BCR
Prairie warbler
BCC Rangewide
---- ---- ---- -
+--- ---- ---- ---- ---
Jillr1+1Jill-
(CON)
Woodpecker
— — — — — — — — — — — — -
—III Jill Jill Jill II-- - - - - - - - - ---
BCC Rangewide
(CON)
Rusty Blackbird — — — — — — — +--- --+— +—+ +— —
BCC -BCR
Wood Thrush
BCOCRangewide — — — — --------+—_— —III Jill Jill Jill --- - - - - - - -

11/03/2021 Event Code: 04EN1000-2022-E-00198 4
Additional information can be found using the following links:
■ Birds of Conservation Concern http://www.fws.gov/birds/management/managed-species/
birds-of-conservation-concern.php
■ Measures for avoiding and minimizing impacts to birds http://www.fws.gov/bird5/
management/project-assessment-tools-and-guidance/
conservation-measures.php
■ Nationwide conservation measures for birds http://www.fws.gov/migratorybirds/pdf/
management/nationwidestandardconservationmeasures.pdf
Migratory Birds FAQ
Tell me more about conservation measures I can implement to avoid or minimize impacts
to migratory birds.
Nationwide Conservation Measures describes measures that can help avoid and minimize
impacts to all birds at any location year round. Implementation of these measures is particularly
important when birds are most likely to occur in the project area. When birds may be breeding in
the area, identifying the locations of any active nests and avoiding their destruction is a very
helpful impact minimization measure. To see when birds are most likely to occur and be breeding
in your project area, view the Probability of Presence Summary. Additional measures or permits
may be advisable depending on the type of activity you are conducting and the type of
infrastructure or bird species present on your project site.
What does IPaC use to generate the migratory birds potentially occurring in my specified
location?
The Migratory Bird Resource List is comprised of USFWS Birds of Conservation Concern
(BCQ and other species that may warrant special attention in your project location.
The migratory bird list generated for your project is derived from data provided by the Avian
Knowledge Network (AKN). The AKN data is based on a growing collection of survey, banding_,
and citizen science datasets and is queried and filtered to return a list of those birds reported as
occurring in the 10km grid cell(s) which your project intersects, and that have been identified as
warranting special attention because they are a BCC species in that area, an eagle (Eagle Act
requirements may apply), or a species that has a particular vulnerability to offshore activities or
development.
Again, the Migratory Bird Resource list includes only a subset of birds that may occur in your
project area. It is not representative of all birds that may occur in your project area. To get a list
of all birds potentially present in your project area, please visit the AKN Phenology Tool.
What does IPaC use to generate the probability of presence graphs for the migratory birds
potentially occurring in my specified location?
The probability of presence graphs associated with your migratory bird list are based on data
provided by the Avian Knowledge Network (AKN). This data is derived from a growing
collection of survey, banding, and citizen science datasets .

11/03/2021 Event Code: 04EN1000-2022-E-00198
Probability of presence data is continuously being updated as new and better information
becomes available. To learn more about how the probability of presence graphs are produced and
how to interpret them, go the Probability of Presence Summary and then click on the "Tell me
about these graphs" link.
How do I know if a bird is breeding, wintering, migrating or present year-round in my
project area?
To see what part of a particular bird's range your project area falls within (i.e. breeding,
wintering, migrating or year-round), you may refer to the following resources: The Cornell Lab
of Ornithology All About Birds Bird Guide, or (if you are unsuccessful in locating the bird of
interest there), the Cornell Lab of Ornithology Neotropical Birds guide. If a bird on your
migratory bird species list has a breeding season associated with it, if that bird does occur in your
project area, there may be nests present at some point within the timeframe specified. If "Breeds
elsewhere" is indicated, then the bird likely does not breed in your project area.
What are the levels of concern for migratory birds?
Migratory birds delivered through IPaC fall into the following distinct categories of concern:
1. "BCC Rangewide" birds are Birds of Conservation Concern (BCC) that are of concern
throughout their range anywhere within the USA (including Hawaii, the Pacific Islands,
Puerto Rico, and the Virgin Islands);
2. "BCC - SCR" birds are BCCs that are of concern only in particular Bird Conservation
Regions (SCRs) in the continental USA; and
3. "Non -BCC - Vulnerable" birds are not BCC species in your project area, but appear on
your list either because of the Eagle Act requirements (for eagles) or (for non -eagles)
potential susceptibilities in offshore areas from certain types of development or activities
(e.g. offshore energy development or longline fishing).
Although it is important to try to avoid and minimize impacts to all birds, efforts should be made,
in particular, to avoid and minimize impacts to the birds on this list, especially eagles and BCC
species of rangewide concern. For more information on conservation measures you can
implement to help avoid and minimize migratory bird impacts and requirements for eagles,
please see the FAQs for these topics.
Details about birds that are potentially affected by offshore projects
For additional details about the relative occurrence and abundance of both individual bird species
and groups of bird species within your project area off the Atlantic Coast, please visit the
Northeast Ocean Data Portal. The Portal also offers data and information about other taxa besides
birds that may be helpful to you in your project review. Alternately, you may download the bird
model results files underlying the portal maps through the NOAA NCCOS Integrative Statistical
Modeling and Predictive Mapping of Marine Bird Distributions and Abundance on the Atlantic
Outer Continental Shelf project webpage.
Bird tracking data can also provide additional details about occurrence and habitat use
throughout the year, including migration. Models relying on survey data may not include this
information. For additional information on marine bird tracking data, see the Diving Bird Study
and the nanotag studies or contact Caleb Spiegel or Pam Loring.

11/03/2021 Event Code: 04EN1000-2022-E-00198
What if I have eagles on my list?
If your project has the potential to disturb or kill eagles, you may need to obtain a permit to avoid
violating the Eagle Act should such impacts occur.
Proper Interpretation and Use of Your Migratory Bird Report
The migratory bird list generated is not a list of all birds in your project area, only a subset of
birds of priority concern. To learn more about how your list is generated, and see options for
identifying what other birds may be in your project area, please see the FAQ "What does IPaC
use to generate the migratory birds potentially occurring in my specified location". Please be
aware this report provides the "probability of presence" of birds within the 10 km grid cell(s) that
overlap your project; not your exact project footprint. On the graphs provided, please also look
carefully at the survey effort (indicated by the black vertical bar) and for the existence of the "no
data" indicator (a red horizontal bar). A high survey effort is the key component. If the survey
effort is high, then the probability of presence score can be viewed as more dependable. In
contrast, a low survey effort bar or no data bar means a lack of data and, therefore, a lack of
certainty about presence of the species. This list is not perfect; it is simply a starting point for
identifying what birds of concern have the potential to be in your project area, when they might
be there, and if they might be breeding (which means nests might be present). The list helps you
know what to look for to confirm presence, and helps guide you in knowing when to implement
conservation measures to avoid or minimize potential impacts from your project activities,
should presence be confirmed. To learn more about conservation measures, visit the FAQ "Tell
me about conservation measures I can implement to avoid or minimize impacts to migratory
birds" at the bottom of your migratory bird trust resources page.

11/03/2021 Event Code: 04EN1000-2022-E-00198
Wetlands
Impacts to NWI wetlands and other aquatic habitats may be subject to regulation under Section
404 of the Clean Water Act, or other State/Federal statutes.
For more information please contact the Regulatory Program of the local U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers District.
Please note that the NWI data being shown may be out of date. We are currently working to
update our NWI data set. We recommend you verify these results with a site visit to determine
the actual extent of wetlands on site.
THERE ARE NO WETLANDS WITHIN YOUR PROJECT AREA.

• r y�. •
HPOWEB 2.0 General Audience
or
.:; �• .err - .z.
• � 7-� r� _— ;t N; � _� _ a art:•- .. .�
o
• NI.]Rfi03516, [4031]fli4iixs ,M '�
: V-.f
esri