20211636 Ver 1_Forlines Force Main_Updated_PJD_Package_08262021_Flat_20211108

Greenville
Utilities
August 26, 2021
United States Army Corps of Engineers
Washington Regulatory Field Office
ATTN: Emily Thompson
2407 West Fifth Street
Washington, North Carolina 27889
SUBJECT: Updated Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination (PJD) Package for the following Greenville
Utilities Commission Project: Proposed Forlines Force Main Project in Winterville, North Carolina
(Action ID No. SAW-2020-01578).
Ms. Thompson:
The Greenville Utilities Commission is proposing sanitary sewer improvements as part of the Forlines Force Main
project in Winterville, North Carolina. The Commission is proposing improvements to the wastewater system
involving approximately 6,000 linear feet of force main. This project extends along the Swift Creek Canal from
Pump Station No. 2 on SR 1125 (Forlines Road), north to the existing pump station west of Pitt Community College
(along a gravel road off of Sterling Pointe Drive) (Appendix A; Figure 1). Three Oaks Engineering, Inc. (Three
Oaks) has been contracted by the Commission, as a sub -consultant to Highfill Infrastructure Engineering, P.C.
(Highfill), to perform wetland and stream delineations within the approximately 10.7-acre project corridor. The PJD
Package was originally submitted to regulatory agencies on September 8, 2020 and was assigned Action ID No.
SAW-2020-01578. Since that time, Three Oaks has been in correspondence with the United States Army Corps of
Engineers (USACE) to discuss the submittal. Based on these conversations, it was determined that the package
required updates, including revisions to the wetland determination forms and inclusion of four channels as potentially
jurisdictional non -wetland waters (SC -SF below). Below is an updated overview of the project, figures depicting all
features, and appropriate updated forms.
On June 2, 2020, Three Oaks staff members Nathan Howell, James Mason, Nancy Oberle, and Lillian Lovingood
conducted a site investigation (Appendix A, Figures 2 — 4). Fourteen potential jurisdictional features (Four streams,
four channels with a potential Ordinary High Water Mark [OHWM], and six wetlands) were identified within the
area of interest. One potential surface water (i.e., ponds, basins, or tributaries) was identified. This feature,
Pond PA, is just outside of the area of interest, but was included so that its location was shown during the design
process (Tables 1-4). All features are in the Neuse River Basin (United States Geological Survey Hydrologic
Unit Code 03020202).
North Carolina Division of Water Resources (NCDWR) Stream Identification forms were not completed for any
potential streams since all definitive streams (shown on topographic and/or soil survey mapping) exhibited
geomorphological, hydrological, and biological characteristics indicative of perennial streams. Stream Identification
forms were not completed for the four additional channels since all appeared to possess an OHWM indicative of a
potentially jurisdictional feature. North Carolina Stream Assessment Method (NCSAM) forms were also not
completed for potential streams/channels due to their overall quality when considering the surrounding landscape
and the lack of permanent impacts to these features anticipated for the project. USACE Wetland Determination forms
www.guc.com
Your Local
Advantage

(wetland and upland) are included for each potential jurisdictional wetland. North Carolina Wetland Assessment
Method (NCWAM) forms are also provided for wetlands/wetland sections that were disturbed/lower quality
(Appendix B). A USACE ORM Data Entry form, USACE Jurisdictional Determination Request form, USACE PJD
Form, Agent Authorization form, and a USACE Waters Upload spreadsheet are also included with this submittal
(Appendix Q. Please see the following PJD Package:
Table 1. Potentially jurisdictional non -wetland waters in the study area
NCDWR
Best Usage
Bank
Bankfull
Depth
Stream Name
Map ID
Index
Classification
Height
width
(in.)
Number
Swift Creek
Swift Creek
27-97-(0.5)
C; Sw, NSW
6-8
10-20
4-16
Gum Swamp
Gum
27-97-1
C; Sw; NSW
6
12-15
4-12
Swam
Unnamed
Tributary (UT)
SA
27-97-(0.5)
C; Sw, NSW
3
3-4
1
to Swift Creek
UT to Swift
SB
27-97-(0.5)
C; Sw, NSW
3-4
5-6
3-4
Creek
UT to Swift
SC
27-97-(0.5)
C; Sw, NSW
1-3
2-3
2
Creek
UT to Swift
SD
27-97-(0.5)
C; Sw, NSW
1-3
2-3
2
Creek
UT to Swift
SE
27-97-(0.5)
C; Sw, NSW
1-3
2-3
2
Creek
UT to Swift
SF
27-97-(0.5)
C; Sw, NSW
1-3
2-3
3
Creek
Table 2. Characteristics of potentially jurisdictional non -wetland waters in the study area
Length
On Topo orSoil
Map ID
ft.
Classification
NCSAM Rating
Survey?
Swift Creek
150
Perennial
Yes Both
Gum Swamp
11
Perennial
*1
Yes Both
SA
52
Perennial
* 1
Yes Both
SB
42
Perennial
*1
Yes Soil Survey Only)
Unknown (but had
* 1
SC
7
No
OHWM
Unknown (but had
* 1
No
SD
42
OHWM
Unknown (but had
* 1
No
SE
13
OHWM
Unknown (but had
* 1
No
SF
54
OHWM
Total
371
1 NCSAM forms were not completed for these features since they displayed good quality, especially considering the surrounding
landscape. Also, permanent impacts are not anticipated to these features by the project.

Table 3. Characteristics of potentially jurisdictional wetlands in the study area
Map
NCWAM
Hydrologic
Area (ac.) in
NCWAM Rating
ID
Classification
Classification
Study Area
WA
Flood lain Pool
Low
Riparian
0.01
WB
Bottomland Hardwood
Low'
Riparian
0.66
Forest
WC
Bottomland Hardwood
Low'
Riparian
0.89
Forest
WD
Flood lain Pool
Low
Riparian
<0.01
WE
Bottomland Hardwood
Low'
Riparian
0.78
Forest
WF
Bottomland Hardwood
Low'
Riparian
0.96
Forest
'The NCWAM score is only for the disturbed portions of
these wetlands within the mowed sewer line easement. The
Total
3.30
remaining portions of these wetlands are good quality and did
not require NCWAM forms.
Table 4. Potentially jurisdictional non -wetland waters (open water)
in/adjacent to the study area
Map ID of
Surface Water
Area (ac.)
Connection
PA
N/A
0.20
Note: This surface water is entirely outside of the area of interest but was included so that it could be
considered in the design.
If you have any questions, require additional information, or would like to schedule a site visit, please contact me by
email at Sprindw(cr�,guc.com. Alternatively, you can also contact James Mason at Three Oaks, who is the authorized
agent for the PJD for this project, either by phone at [phone] or by email at
james.mason(c�r�,threeoaksengineering.com. This is a request for concurrence with our assessment. We appreciate
your assistance on this project.
Sincerely,
Digitally signed by James
James Mason A9ason For
Date: 2021.0826 152140
-04'00'
David W Springer, P.E.
Assistant Director of Water Resources
Greenville Utilities Commission
PO Box 1847
Greenville, NC 27835
Cc: NCDWR, Washington Regional Office

Appendix A
Figures

Preparetl Far:
,c\g �EERI*e , Greenville Utilities Commission
Forlines Force Main Project
SAW
a Vicinity Map
04
V. Greenville Pitt County, North Carolina
19) Utilities
Data
June 2020
�aa
0 295 590 Ft
I I
Job N.
20-6xx
Drawn By
By
NDH
JSM
Figure
1

0 205 410 820 1,230 1,646
Feet
Legend
Map Sheets
QArea of Interest
Roads
Potentially Jurisdictional Non -wetland Waters
Culvert
Potentially Jurisdictional Non -wetland Waters (Open Water)
Potentially Jurisdictional Wetland Waters
Disturbed
® Undisturbed
•
C Sim
o
Fad ■
1
f 511 t
Ili
1�1`
1`
Oar
r
Ch
' Ce
— 'J,r
g2lational
:© Geo,,a, htocie
P,.p... d Far:
��,,�6WR%,, , Greenville Utilities Commission
d Forlines Force Main Project
r+�
r1 0 Topographic Map Index
- S� Greenville
Ali] 3N\`�\ Utilities Pitt County, North Carolina
Date
August 2021
o
zso soo Ft
Job N.
20-607
maws Dy:
cb-tea Dy:
NDH
I JSM
Figure
2

0 90 180 360 540 720 7
Feet
�H
WC
WC
WC
WC WB
Gum_SwaMP WB * Swift Creek
Forlln�
- i
WA
Legend
Map Sheets _
Area of Interest
Roads
Potentially Jurisdictional Non -wetland Waters IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIM— III
Culvert
Potentially Jurisdictional Non -wetland Waters (Open Water)
Potentially Jurisdictional Wetland Waters
® Disturbed
® Undisturbed
Copyright:© 2013 auto al Geographic - ciet - bed
Rep.,e For:
Greenville Utilities Commission
W Forlines Force Main Project
y`a \ Topographic Map
r ��• S� Greenville
Utilities Pitt County, North Carolina
Date
August 2021
0 115 230 Ft
Job N.
20-607
Drawn Dy:
cnal tl nv:
NDH
JSM
Figure
2
Sheet 2-1

0 75 150 300 450 600 N
Feet
! SD
9 - 4 \
IMM511 �Ftl
WD �f
PA 400
ort F arn`
pavon�
WC
Legend
Map Sheets
Area of Interest
Roads
Potentially Jurisdictional Non -wetland Waters
Culvert
WC Potentially Jurisdictional Non -wetland Waters (Open Water)
Potentially Jurisdictional Wetland Waters
® Disturbed
ad= ®Undisturbed
Copyright:© 2013 National Geographic Softy, i-cubed
Rep, For:
Greenville Utilities Commission
Forlines Force Main Project
`o Topographic Map
Vo.: w,a%� Greenville Utilities
d�33N�Pitt County, North Carolina
I III
`�
Date
August 2021
s<a�
0 90 180 Ft
Job N.
20-607
Drawn By :
cbal tl By
NDH
JSM
Figure
2
Sheet 2-2

0 80 160 320 480 640
Feet
0
_..�
000. WF
WF
_ WF
3
WF
SB aw
SF
7 WE
I w N%446
SD
Legend
Map Sheets
Area of Interest
Roads
Potentially Jurisdictional Non -wetland Waters
Culvert
2 WE Potentially Jurisdictional Non -wetland Waters (Open Water)
Potentially Jurisdictional Wetland Waters
® Disturbed
® Undisturbed
Copyright:© 20 ational Geographic Society, i-cubed
Rep.,e For:
,,\pNEER/y� , Greenville Utilities Commission
Forlines Force Main Project
y` \ Topographic Map
✓. ��• S Greenville
Utilities Pitt County, North Carolina
Dee
August 2021
0 95 190 Ft
Job N.
20-607
Drawn By
By c'-- :
NDH
JSM
Figure
2
Sheet 2-3

205 410' 820 d 1,23 1,640
Feet
Legend
Map Sheets
QArea of Interest
Roads
Potentially Jurisdictional Non -wetland Waters
Culvert
Potentially Jurisdictional Non -wetland Waters (Open Water)
Potentially Jurisdictional Wetland Waters
® Disturbed
® Undisturbed
en_
■ me
A.
n
y f t
Q7
1 �
q �
a Q°�. ::. �� T •:
ECenter for Ggpgraphlc lnfcrmatloq,&A'nalysls
Prep ... d Far:
Greenville Utilities Commission
d Forlines Force Main Project
A
r1 0 Jurisdictional Features Map Index
S� Greenville
Utilities Pitt County, North Carolina
oate
August 2021
o
zso soo Ft
Job No.:
20-e07
D— sy:
cb-tea sy:
NDH
I JSM
Figure
3

Rep.,e For:
,,\pNEER/y� , Greenville Utilities Commission
Forlines Force Main Project
yr` Vct \ Jurisdictional Features Map
��' S Greenville
`'*183W0\--' Utilities Pitt County, North Carolina
Date
August 2021
0 115 230 Ft
Job No.:
20-607
Drawn By
.bale, Dy:
NDH
JSM
Figure
3
Sheet 3-1

Rep.,e For:
,,\pNEER/y� , Greenville Utilities Commission
Forlines Force Main Project
yr` Vct \ Jurisdictional Features Map
��' S Greenville
`'*183W0\--' Utilities Pitt County, North Carolina
Date
August 2021
0 90 180 Ft
Job No.:
20-607
Drawn By
.bale, Dy:
NDH
JSM
Figure
3
Sheet 3-2

Rep.,e For:
,,\pNEER/y� , Greenville Utilities Commission
Forlines Force Main Project
yr` Vct \ Jurisdictional Features Map
��' S Greenville
`'*183W0\--' Utilities Pitt County, North Carolina
Date
August 2021
0 95 190 Ft
Job No.:
20-607
Drawn By
.bale, Dy:
NDH
JSM
Figure
3
Sheet 3-3

0 205 410 820 1,230 1,640
Feet
Legend
Map Sheets
QArea of Interest
Roads
Potentially Jurisdictional Non -wetland Waters
Culvert
Potentially Jurisdictional Non -wetland Waters (Open Water)
Potentially Jurisdictional Wetland Waters
® Disturbed
Undisturbed
Value
—MW High: 79.2085
Aff Low:47.1326
Qo
y
•�F ® �ogrdp f• a g.a s
P,.p... d Far:
Greenville Utilities Commission
d Forlines Force Main Project
A
W 0 LiDAR Map Index
:arl
V.W • S� Greenville
Utilities Pitt County, North Carolina
Dare
August 2021
o
zso soo Ft
Job No.:
20-607
Drawn By
C1-- By
NDH
J S M
Figure
4

0 90 180 360 540 720
F
Legend
Map Sheets
Area of Interest
Roads
Potentially Jurisdictional Non -wetland Waters
Culvert
Potentially Jurisdictional Non -wetland Waters (Open Water)
Potentially Jurisdictional Wetland Waters
® Disturbed
Undisturbed
Value
High :752875
Low :432497
Rep.,e For:
\6\NEER/yC ,
G� r.
Greenville
3WO\--' Utilities
Greenville Utilities Commission
Forlines Force Main Project
LiDAR Map
Pitt County, North Carolina
Creek
Date
August 2021
scar
0 115 230 Ft
Job N.
20-e07
Drawn By
Chala:rtl By
NDH
JSM
DI
Figure
4
Sheet 4-1

0 75 150 300 450 600
Feet
N
SD
WE
Legend
Map Sheets
Area of Interest
Roads
- Potentially Jurisdictional Non -wetland Waters
Culvert
Potentially Jurisdictional Non -wetland Waters (Open Water)
Potentially Jurisdictional Wetland Waters
® Disturbed
® Undisturbed
Value
High : 752875
Low :432497
Rep.,e For:
,,\pNEER/y� V
Greenville Utilities Commission
Forlines Force Main Project
CN AW.--— LiDAR Map
✓. ��• S Greenville
Utilities Pitt County, North Carolina
Dee
August 2021
0 90 180 Ft
Job N.
20-607
Drawn Dy:
Chala:rtl By:
NDH
JSM
&Analysis
Figure
4
Sheet 4-2

0 80 160 320 480 640
Feet
WF
M
WF
SF
.. 4b.' ■ ' 1
DI
Legend
Map Sheets
Area of Interest
SD
Roads
Potentially Jurisdictional Non -wetland Waters
Culvert
�- Potentially Jurisdictional Non -wetland Waters (Open Water)
Potentially Jurisdictional Wetland Waters
® Disturbed
® Undisturbed
Value
WE d - w High: 752875
Low : 432497
NC Center for Geographic Information & Analysis
Rep ,c,J For:
Greenville Utilities Commission
Forlines Force Main Project
` o LiDAR Map
vo.: W,a%� Greenville d�33Utilities Pitt County, North Carolina
N�`�
Date
August 2021
0 95 190 Ft
I��
Job N.
20-607
Drawn By
Chala:rtl By
NDH
JSM
Figure
4
Sheet 4-3

Appendix B
Wetland Data Forms

Wetland WA
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers OMB Control #: 0710-xxxx, Exp: Pending
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT.•
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R (Authority: AR 335-15, paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: Forlines Force Main Project City/County: Pitt Sampling Date: 06/02/2020
Applicant/Owner: Greenville Utilities Comm. State: NC Sampling Point: W1-1 Wet
Investigator(s): Nathan Howell & Lillian Lovingood Section, Township, Range: Greenville
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): Floodplain Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave Slope (%): 0
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR T, MLRA 153A Lat: 35.537550 Long:-77.418673 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: Bibb Complex NWI classification: PFO1Cd
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes No X
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS —Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No within a Wetland? Yes X No_
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
NCWAM: Floodplain Pool. This small wetland depression is located entirely within a utility right-of-way that is periodically mowed
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
Surface Soil Cracks (136)
X Surface Water (Al)
_Aquatic Fauna (1313)
_Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
X High Water Table (A2)
—Marl Deposits (1315) (LRR U)
—Drainage Patterns (1310)
X Saturation (A3)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
_ Moss Trim Lines (B16)
—Water Marks (B1)
—Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
X Sediment Deposits (132)
—Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
—Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Drift Deposits (133)
_ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
X Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_Algal Mat or Crust (134)
_Thin Muck Surface (C7)
X Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Iron Deposits (135)
—Other (Explain in Remarks)
—Shallow Aquitard (D3)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
X FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
X Water -Stained Leaves (139)
Sphagnum Moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes X
No Depth (inches): 1
Water Table Present? Yes X
No Depth (inches): 0
Saturation Present? Yes X No Depth (inches): 0 Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks
ENG FORM 6116-2-SG, JUL 2018 Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain — Version 2.0

Wetland WA
VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: W1-1 wet
Absolute Dominant
Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: W/in wetland)
% Cover Species?
Status
Dominance Test worksheet:
1. Absent
Number of Dominant Species
2.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 2 (A)
3.
Total Number of Dominant
4.
Species Across All Strata: 3 (B)
5.
Percent of Dominant Species
6.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 66.7% (A/B
7.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
8.
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
=Total Cover
OBL species x 1 =
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
FACW species x 2 =
Saplina/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: W/in wetland)
FAC species x 3 =
1. Absent
FACU species x 4 =
2.
UPL species x 5 =
3.
Column Totals: (A) (B
4.
Prevalence Index = B/A =
5.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
6.
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
7.
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
8.
3 - Prevalence Index is :53.0'
=Total Cover
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
Herb Stratum (Plot size: W/in wetland
1. Murdannia keisak
40 Yes
OBL
Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must t
2. Juncus effusus
20 Yes
OBL
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3. Carex spp. 20 Yes
4.
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) c
5.
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless o
6
height.
7.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
8.
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
9.
10.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
11.
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
12.
80 =Total Cover
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
50% of total cover: 40
20% of total cover:
16
height.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: W/in wetland
1. Absent
2.
3.
4.
5.
Hydrophytic
=Total Cover
Vegetation
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
Present? Yes X No
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below.)
Due to the size of the wetland, a 30-foot radius assessment of hydrophytic vegetation was not possible. Therefore, hydrophytic vegetation was assessed
within the wetland boundaries.

SOIL
Wetland WA
Sampling Point: W1-1 Wet
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix
Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) %
Color (moist) % Type' LoC2
Texture Remarks
0-5 10YR 3/1 85
7.5YR 4/6 15 C M
Loamy/Clayey Prominent redox concentrations
5-12 10YR 4/1 80
7.5YR 4/6 20 C M
Loamy/Clayey Prominent redox concentrations
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
_ Histosol (Al)
—Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
_ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
—Barrier Islands 1 cm Muck (S12)
_2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
_ Black Histic (A3)
(MLRA 153B, 153D)
—Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
—Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
(outside MLRA 150A)
—Stratified Layers (A5)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Reduced Vertic (F18)
—Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
X Depleted Matrix (F3)
(outside MLRA 150A, 150B)
_ 5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
X Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, T)
_ Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_Anomalous Bright Floodplain Soils (F20)
_ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
X Redox Depressions (F8)
(MLRA 153B)
X Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1)
_ Marl (F10) (LRR U)
—Red Parent Material (F21)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_ Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
_Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T) (outside MLRA 138, 152A in FL, 154)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
—Barrier Islands Low Chroma Matrix (TS7)
—Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
—Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
(MLRA 153B, 153D)
_Sandy Redox (S5)
Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 150B)
_Other (Explain in Remarks)
—Stripped Matrix (S6)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
_ Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
_Anomalous Bright Floodplain Soils (F20)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8)
(MLRA 149A, 153C9 153D)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
(LRR S, T, U)
_Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
wetland hydrology must be present,
(MLRA 138, 152A in FL, 154)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
Remarks
ENG FORM 6116-2-SG, JUL 2018 Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain — Version 2.0

Wetlands WB and WC
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers OMB Control #: 0710-xxxx, Exp: Pending
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT.,
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R (Authority: AR 335-15, paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: Forlines Force Main Project City/County: Pitt Sampling Date: 06/02/2020
Applicant/Owner: Greenville Utilities Commiss. State: NC Sampling Point: W3-20a Wet
Investigator(s): Nathan Howell and Lillian Lovingood Section, Township, Range: Greenville
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): Floodplain Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave Slope (%): 0
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR T, MLRA 153A Lat: 35.542545 Long:-77.420846 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: Bibb Complex NWI classification: PFO1Cd
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No within a Wetland? Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
NCWAM: Bottomland Hardwood Forest. This wetland is labeled as "WC" on the mapping. Portions of this wetland extend into the adjacent utility
right-of-way. This form was completed just inside the woodsline from the utility corridor. Wetland "WB" possesses a similar landscape position as well
as hydrologic, floristic and soil characteristics. For those reasons, it is also represented by this form.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
Surface Soil Cracks (136)
X Surface Water (Al)
_Aquatic Fauna (1313)
_Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
X High Water Table (A2)
_ Marl Deposits (B15) (LRR U)
—Drainage Patterns (1310)
X Saturation (A3)
—Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
—Moss Trim Lines (1316)
X Water Marks (131)
_Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_Sediment Deposits (132)
_Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
X Crayfish Burrows (C8)
X Drift Deposits (133)
_Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_Algal Mat or Crust (134)
_Thin Muck Surface (C7)
X Geomorphic Position (D2)
_Iron Deposits (135)
_Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ShallowAquitard (D3)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
X FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
X Water -Stained Leaves (139)
Sphagnum Moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes X
No Depth (inches): 2
Water Table Present? Yes X
No Depth (inches): 0
Saturation Present? Yes X No Depth (inches): 0 Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116-2-SG, JUL 2018 Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain — Version 2.0

Wetlands WB and WC
VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: W3-20a Wet
Absolute
Dominant
Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' radius )
% Cover
Species?
Status
Dominance Test worksheet:
1. Nyssa aquatica
20
Yes
OBL
Number of Dominant Species
2. Populus heterophylla
20
Yes
OBL
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 7 (A)
3. Acerrubrum
20
Yes
FAC
Total Number of Dominant
4.
Species Across All Strata: 7 (B)
5.
Percent of Dominant Species
6.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100.0% (A/B
7.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
8.
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
60
=Total Cover
OBL species 95 x 1 = 95
50% of total cover:
30 20%
of total cover:
12
FACW species 25 x 2 = 50
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 30' radius
)
FAC species 50 x 3 = 150
1. Acerrubrum
20
Yes
FAC
FACU species 0 x 4 = 0
2.
UPL species 0 x 5 = 0
3.
Column Totals: 170 (A) 295 (B
4.
Prevalence Index = B/A = 1.74
5.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
6.
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
7.
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
8.
X 3 - Prevalence Index is <_3.01
20
=Total Cover
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
50% of total cover:
10 20%
of total cover:
4
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 30' radius )
1. Saururus cernuus
40
Yes
OBL
Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must t
2. Arundinaria tecta
25
Yes
FACW
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3. Juncus effusus 15 No OBL
4. Carex sp.
15
No
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) c
5.
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless o
6
height.
7.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
8.
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
9.
10.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
11.
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
12.
95
=Total Cover
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
50% of total cover:
48 20%
of total cover:
19
height.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30' radius )
1. Berchemia scandens
10
Yes
FAC
2.
3.
4.
5.
Hydrophytic
10
=Total Cover
Vegetation
50% of total cover:
5 20%
of total cover:
2
Present? Yes X No
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below.)
ENG FORM 6116-2-SG, JUL 2018
Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain - Version 2.0

SOIL
Wetlands WB and WC
Sampling Point: W3-20a Wet
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Types Loc2 Texture Remarks
0-4 10YR 3/2 80 7.5YR 4/6 20 C M Loamy/Clayey Prominent redox concentrations
4-12 10YR 4/1 80 7.5YR 4/6 20 C M Loamy/Clayey
Prominent redox concentrations
Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs,
unless otherwise noted.)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
_ Histosol (Al)
—Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
_ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
—Barrier Islands 1 cm Muck (S12)
_2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
—Black Histic (A3)
(MLRA 15313, 153D)
—Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
—Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
—Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
(outside MLRA 150A)
—Stratified Layers (A5)
—Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Reduced Vertic (F18)
—Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
X Depleted Matrix (F3)
(outside MLRA 150A, 15013)
_ 5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
X Redox Dark Surface (F6)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, T)
—Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_Anomalous Bright Floodplain Soils (F20)
_ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
(MLRA 15313)
X Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1)
—Marl (F10) (LRR U)
—Red Parent Material (F21)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
_Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
—Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T)
(outside MLRA 138, 152A in FL, 154)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
—Barrier Islands Low Chroma Matrix (TS7)
—Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
—Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
(MLRA 15313, 153D)
_Sandy Redox (S5)
Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 15013)
_Other (Explain in Remarks)
—Stripped Matrix (S6)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
_ Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
_Anomalous Bright Floodplain Soils (F20)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8)
(MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
(LRR S, T, U)
_Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
wetland hydrology must be present,
(MLRA 138, 152A in FL, 154)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116-2-SG, JUL 2018 Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain — Version 2.0

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers OMB Control #: 0710-xxxx, Exp: Pending
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT:
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R (Authority: AR 335-15, paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: Forlines Force Main Project City/County: Winterville, Pitt Sampling Date: 6/2/2020
Applicant/Owner: Greenville Utilities Commission State: NC Sampling Point: WD Wet
Investigator(s): Jim Mason, Nancy Oberle Section, Township, Range: ---
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): depression Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope (%): 1-2
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR T, MLRA 153A Lat: 35.54486673 Long:-77.42026887 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: Bibb Complex (Bb) NWI classification: PEM1A
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation X Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No within a Wetland? Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
Wetland WD is a small floodplain pool located in the existed easement. It is mowed regularly, which affects its vegetation composition
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
Surface Soil Cracks (136)
—Surface Water (Al) _Aquatic
Fauna (1313)
—Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
X High Water Table (A2) _
Marl Deposits (B15) (LRR U)
X Drainage Patterns (1310)
X Saturation (A3) —Hydrogen
Sulfide Odor (Cl)
—Moss Trim Lines (1316)
—Water Marks (131) —Oxidized
Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
—Sediment Deposits (132) —Presence
of Reduced Iron (C4)
—Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Drift Deposits (133) —Recent
Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
—Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_Algal Mat or Crust (134) _Thin
Muck Surface (C7)
X Geomorphic Position (D2)
—Iron Deposits (135) —Other
(Explain in Remarks)
—Shallow Aquitard (D3)
—Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
X FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Water -Stained Leaves (139)
Sphagnum Moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches): 0
Water Table Present? Yes X No
Depth (inches): 10
Saturation Present? Yes X No
Depth (inches): 0
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116-2-SG, JUL 2018 Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain —Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata;- Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: WD Wet
Tree Stratum (Plot size:
within wetland)
% Cover Species?
Status
Dominance Test worksheet:
1
Number of Dominant Species
2.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 2 (A)
3.
Total Number of Dominant
4.
Species Across All Strata: 2 (B)
5.
Percent of Dominant Species
6.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100.0% (A/B)
7.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
8.
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
=Total Cover
OBL species x 1 =
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
FACW species x 2 =
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: within wetland)
FAC species x 3 =
1.
FACU species x 4 =
2.
UPL species x 5 =
3.
Column Totals: (A) (B)
4.
Prevalence Index = B/A =
5.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
6.
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
7.
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
8.
3 - Prevalence Index is <_3.01
=Total Cover
-Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
Herb Stratum (Plot size:
within wetland )
1. Juncus effusus
80 Yes
OBL
Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
2. Carex lurida
20 Yes
OBL
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3.
4.
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
5.
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
6
height.
7.
Sapling/Shrub -Woody plants, excluding vines, less
8.
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
9.
10.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
11.
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
12.
100 =Total Cover
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
50% of total cover: 50
20% of total cover:
20
height.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: within wetland )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Hydrophytic
=Total Cover
Vegetation
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
Present? Yes X No
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below.)
Due to the size of the wetland, a 30-foot radius assessment of hydrophytic vegetation was not possible. Therefore, hydrophytic vegetation
was assessed within the wetland boundaries.
ENG FORM 6116-2-SG, JUL 2018 Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain -Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: WD Wet
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix
Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) %
Color (moist) % Type Loc Texture Remarks
0-16 10YR 3/1 95
10YR 4/4 5 C M Loamy/Clayey Distinct redox concentrations
Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
_ Histosol (Al)
—Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
_ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
—Barrier Islands 1 cm Muck (S12)
_2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
—Black Histic (A3)
(MLRA 15313, 153D)
—Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
—Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
—Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
(outside MLRA 150A)
—Stratified Layers (A5)
—Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Reduced Vertic (F18)
—Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
(outside MLRA 150A, 15013)
_5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
X Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, T)
—Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_Anomalous Bright Floodplain Soils (F20)
_ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
(MLRA 15313)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1)
_ Marl (F10) (LRR U)
—Red Parent Material (F21)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
_Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A_
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T)
(outside MLRA 138, 152A in FL, 154)
_Sandy Mucky Mineral (S 1) (LRR O, S)
X Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
_ Barrier Islands Low Chroma Matrix (TS7)
—Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
—Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
(MLRA 15313, 153D)
—Sandy Redox (S5)
—Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 15013)
—Other (Explain in Remarks)
—Stripped Matrix (S6)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
—Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
_Anomalous Bright Floodplain Soils (F20)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8)
(MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
(LRR S, T, U)
_Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
wetland hydrology must be present,
(MLRA 138, 152A in FL, 154)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116-2-SG, JUL 2018 Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain —Version 2.0

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers OMB Control #: 0710-xxxx, Exp: Pending
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT:
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R (Authority: AR 335-15, paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: Forlines Force Main Project City/County: Winterville, Pitt Sampling Date: 6/2/2020
Applicant/Owner: Greenville Utilities Commission State: NC Sampling Point: WE-WF Wet
Investigator(s): Jim Mason, Nancy Oberle Section, Township, Range: ---
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): depression Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR T, MLRA 153A Lat: 35.5511301893 Long:-77.41620745620
Soil Map Unit Name: Bibb Complex (Bb) NWI classification
Slope (%): 1-2
Datum: NAD 83
PF01C
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No within a Wetland? Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
This form is for both WE and WF. A large majority of both wetlands are wooded Bottomland Hardwood Forest; however, there is some disturbed
area due to a power line ROW and an existing sewer easement.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
Surface Soil Cracks (136)
X Surface Water (Al) _Aquatic
Fauna (1313)
_Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
X High Water Table (A2) _
Marl Deposits (B15) (LRR U)
X Drainage Patterns (1310)
X Saturation (A3) —Hydrogen
Sulfide Odor (Cl)
X Moss Trim Lines (1316)
—Water Marks (131) —Oxidized
Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
—Sediment Deposits (132) —Presence
of Reduced Iron (C4)
—Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Drift Deposits (133) —Recent
Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
—Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_Algal Mat or Crust (134) _Thin
Muck Surface (C7)
X Geomorphic Position (D2)
—Iron Deposits (135) —Other
(Explain in Remarks)
—Shallow Aquitard (D3)
—Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
X FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
X Water -Stained Leaves (139)
Sphagnum Moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes X No
Depth (inches): 0.5
Water Table Present? Yes X No
Depth (inches): 0
Saturation Present? Yes X No
Depth (inches): 0
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116-2-SG, JUL 2018 Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain —Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata;- Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: WE-WF Wet
ADSDIUte
uominant
Inaicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft )
% Cover
Species?
Status
Dominance Test worksheet:
1.
Liquidambarstyraciflua
30
Yes
FAC
Number of Dominant Species
2.
Acer rubrum
30
Yes
FAC
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 9 (A)
3.
Salix nigra
20
Yes
OBL
Total Number of Dominant
4.
Species Across All Strata: 9 (B)
5.
Percent of Dominant Species
6.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100.0% (A/B)
7.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
8.
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
80
=Total Cover
OBL species x 1 =
50% of total cover:
40
20% of total cover:
16
FACW species x 2 =
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft
)
FAC species x 3 =
1.
Ligustrum sinense
40
Yes
FAC
FACU species x 4 =
2.
Liquidambarstyraciflua
10
Yes
FAC
UPL species x 5 =
3.
Column Totals: (A) (B)
4.
Prevalence Index = B/A =
5.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
6.
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
7.
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
8.
3 - Prevalence Index is <_3.01
50
=Total Cover
-Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
50% of total cover:
25
20% of total cover:
10
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft )
1.
Saururus cernuus
40
Yes
OBL
Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
2.
Juncus effusus
15
Yes
OBL
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3. Dichanthelium clandestinum 10 No FACW
4.
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
5.
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
6
height.
7.
Sapling/Shrub -Woody plants, excluding vines, less
8.
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
9.
10.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
11.
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
12.
65
=Total Cover
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
50% of total cover:
33
20% of total cover:
13
height.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft )
1.
Campsis radicans
10
Yes
FAC
2.
Vitis rotundifolia
5
Yes
FAC
3.
4.
5.
Hydrophytic
15
=Total Cover
Vegetation
50% of total cover:
8
20% of total cover:
3
Present? Yes X No
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below.)
ENG FORM 6116-2-SG, JUL 2018 Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain -Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: WE-WF Wet
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix
Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) %
Color (moist) % Type Loc Texture Remarks
0-16 10YR 3/1 90
10YR 4/4 10 C M Loamy/Clayey Distinct redox concentrations
Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
_ Histosol (Al)
—Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
_ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
—Barrier Islands 1 cm Muck (S12)
_2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
—Black Histic (A3)
(MLRA 15313, 153D)
—Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
—Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
—Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
(outside MLRA 150A)
—Stratified Layers (A5)
—Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Reduced Vertic (F18)
—Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
(outside MLRA 150A, 15013)
_5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
X Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, T)
—Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_Anomalous Bright Floodplain Soils (F20)
_ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
(MLRA 15313)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1)
_ Marl (F10) (LRR U)
—Red Parent Material (F21)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
_Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A_
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T)
(outside MLRA 138, 152A in FL, 154)
_Sandy Mucky Mineral (S 1) (LRR O, S)
X Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
_ Barrier Islands Low Chroma Matrix (TS7)
—Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
—Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
(MLRA 15313, 153D)
—Sandy Redox (S5)
—Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 15013)
—Other (Explain in Remarks)
—Stripped Matrix (S6)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
—Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
_Anomalous Bright Floodplain Soils (F20)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8)
(MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
(LRR S, T, U)
_Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
wetland hydrology must be present,
(MLRA 138, 152A in FL, 154)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116-2-SG, JUL 2018 Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain —Version 2.0

Wetlands WA-WF Upland
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers OMB Control #: 0710-xxxx, Exp: Pending
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT.,
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R (Authority: AR 335-15, paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: Forlines Force Main Project City/County: Pitt Sampling Date: 06/02/2020
Applicant/Owner: Greenville Utilities Commiss. State: NC Sampling Point: w2-45(wB) Up1
Investigator(s): Nathan Howell & Lillian Lovingood Section, Township, Range: Greenville
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): Streamside Levee Local relief (concave, convex, none): Convex Slope (%): 2
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR T, MLRA 153A Lat: 35.540211 Long:-77.419743 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: Bibb Complex NWI classification: PFO1Cd
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes No X
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No X Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X within a Wetland? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
This upland plot is located within a maintained, streamside, utility right-of-way. This ROW parallels Swift Creek and contains small sections of
wetland from Wetlands WA-WF. Because all of these wetlands creep into the ROW in several areas, and because the ROWS hydrology, flora, and
soils are consistent throughout its length, this form will also cover the upland plots associated wetlands WA, WC, WD-WF.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
Surface Soil Cracks (136)
_Surface Water (Al)
_Aquatic Fauna (1313)
_Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
_ High Water Table (A2)
_ Marl Deposits (B15) (LRR U)
—Drainage Patterns (1310)
—Saturation (A3)
—Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
—Moss Trim Lines (1316)
—Water Marks (131)
—Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
—Sediment Deposits (132)
—Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
—Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Drift Deposits (133)
—Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_Algal Mat or Crust (134)
_Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_Geomorphic Position (D2)
_Iron Deposits (135)
_Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ShallowAquitard (D3)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_ FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Water -Stained Leaves (139)
Sphagnum Moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes
No X Depth (inches): 0
Water Table Present? Yes
No X Depth (inches): 0
Saturation Present? Yes
No X Depth (inches): 0
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116-2-SG, JUL 2018 Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain — Version 2.0

Wetlands WA-WF Upland
VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: W2-45 (WB) Upi
Absolute Dominant
Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' radius )
% Cover Species?
Status
Dominance Test worksheet:
1. Absent
Number of Dominant Species
2.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 1 (A)
3.
Total Number of Dominant
4.
Species Across All Strata: 4 (B)
5.
Percent of Dominant Species
6.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 25.0% (A/B
7.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
8.
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
=Total Cover
OBL species x 1 =
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
FACW species x 2 =
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 30' radius
)
FAC species x 3 =
1. Absent
FACU species x 4 =
2.
UPL species x 5 =
3.
Column Totals: (A) (B
4.
Prevalence Index = B/A =
5.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
6.
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
7.
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
8.
_ 3 - Prevalence Index is <_3.01
=Total Cover
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 30' radius
1. Youngia japonica
10 Yes
FACU
Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must t
2. Lolium arundinaceum
10 Yes
FAC
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3. Lamium purpureum 10 Yes UPL
4.
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) c
5.
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless o
6
height.
7.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
8.
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
9.
10.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
11.
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
12.
30 =Total Cover
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
50% of total cover:
15 20% of total cover:
6
height.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30' radius )
1. Lonicera japonica
20 Yes
FACU
2.
3.
4.
5.
Hydrophytic
20 =Total Cover
Vegetation
50% of total cover:
10 20% of total cover:
4
Present? Yes No X
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below.)
ENG FORM 6116-2-SG, JUL 2018
Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain - Version 2.0

SOIL
Wetlands WA-WF Upland
Sampling Point: W2-45 (WB) Upl
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix
(inches) Color (moist)
Redox Features
Color (moist) % Type' Loc2
Texture
0-4 10YR 6/4 100 Loamy/Clayey
4-12 10YR 4/4 100 Loamy/Clayey
Remarks
Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
_ Histosol (Al)
—Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
_ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
—Barrier Islands 1 cm Muck (S12)
_2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
—Black Histic (A3)
(MLRA 15313, 153D)
—Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
—Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
—Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
(outside MLRA 150A)
—Stratified Layers (A5)
—Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Reduced Vertic (F18)
—Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
(outside MLRA 150A, 15013)
_ 5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, T)
—Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_Anomalous Bright Floodplain Soils (F20)
_ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
(MLRA 15313)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1)
—Marl (F10) (LRR U)
—Red Parent Material (F21)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
_Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
—Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T)
(outside MLRA 138, 152A in FL, 154)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
—Barrier Islands Low Chroma Matrix (TS7)
—Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
—Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
(MLRA 15313, 153D)
_Sandy Redox (S5)
Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 15013)
_Other (Explain in Remarks)
—Stripped Matrix (S6)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
_ Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
_Anomalous Bright Floodplain Soils (F20)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8)
(MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
(LRR S, T, U)
_Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
wetland hydrology must be present,
(MLRA 138, 152A in FL, 154)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
ENG FORM 6116-2-SG, JUL 2018 Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain — Version 2.0

Appendix C
ORM Data Entry Form
JD Request Form
PJD Form
Agent Authorization Form
Waters Upload Spreadsheet

Greenville Utilities Commission - Forlines Force Main Project
AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM
PROPERTY LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
LOT NO. PLAN NO.
PARCEL ID: Multiple PINS
STREET ADDRESS: 354 Forlines Rd, Winterville, NC 28590
Location of Pump Station 2 (start of project)
Please print: City of Greenville
Property Owner:
Property Owner: ATTN: David W. Springer, PE, Assistant Director of Water Resources
The undersigned, registered property owners of the above noted property, do hereby authorize
James Mason of Three Oaks Engineering
(Contractor / Agent) (Name of consulting firm)
to act on my behalf and take all actions necessary for the processing, issuance and acceptance of
this permit or certification and any and all standard and special conditions attached.
Property Owner's Address (if different than property above):
PO Box 1847, Greenville, NC 27835
Telephone:
1-252-551-1553
We hereby certify the above information submitted in this application is true and accurate to the
best of our knowledge.
David W. a °'
Springer
Authorized Signature
Date: 9/3/2020
James
Greenville Utilities Mason °""°'°'"'"" ""°°' Three Oaks Engineering, Inc.
Authorized Signature
Date: 8/25/2020

Preliminary ORM Data Entry Fields for New Actions
SAW — 202 0 - 01578
Prepare file folder
BEGIN DATE [Received Date]:
0
1. Project Name [PCN Form A2a]:
Greenville Utilities Commission- Forlines Force Main Project
2. Work Type: Private
❑
Institutional
❑
Government
FEW
Commercial
❑
3. Project Description / Purpose [PCN Form 133d and 133e]:
The Greenville Utilities Commission is proposing sanitary sewer improvements as part of the Forlines Force Main project. This project extends along the Swift
Creek Canal from Pump Station No. 2 on SR 1125 (Forlines Road), north to the existing pump station west of Pitt Community College (along a gravel road off of
Sterling Pointe Drive)
4. Property Owner / Applicant [PCN Form A3 or A4]: Greenville Utilities Commission
5. Agent / Consultant [PCN Form A5 — or ORM Consultant ID Number]: James Mason, Three Oaks Engineering
6. Related Action ID Number(s) [PCN Form 135b]: N/A
7. Project Location - Coordinates, Street Address, and/or Location Description [PCN Form 131b]:
Corridor between-77.414597, 35.552601 and-77.418404, 35.537102
8. Project Location -Tax Parcel ID [PCN Form 131a]: Multiple PINS
9. Project Location —County [PCN Form A2b]: Pitt County
10. Project Location — Nearest Municipality or Town [PCN Form A2c]: Wlntervllle
11. Project Information — Nearest Waterbody [PCN Form 132a]: Swift Creek
12. Watershed / 8-Digit Hydrologic Unit Code [PCN Form 132c]: 03020202
Authorization: Section 10 ❑ Section 404 FEW Section 10 & 404 ❑
Regulatory Action Type:
eStandard Permit IP
Nationwide Permit #
❑ Regional General Permit #
x❑ Jurisdictional Determination Request
R
Pre-Application Request
Unauthorized Activity
0 Compliance
❑ No Permit Required
Revised 20150602

urisdictional Determination Reauest
U5 Army Corps
of Engineers
Wilmington District
This form is intended for use by anyone requesting a jurisdictional determination (JD) from the
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District (Corps). Please include all supporting
information, as described within each category, with your request. You may submit your request
via mail, electronic mail, or facsimile. Requests should be sent to the appropriate project
manager of the county in which the property is located. A current list of project managers by
assigned counties can be found on-line at:
http://www.saw.usace.aimy.mil/Missions/Re ul�atoiyPermitProf4ram/Contact/CouniyLocator.aspx,
by calling 910-251-4633, or by contacting any of the field offices listed below. Once your
request is received you will be contacted by a Corps project manager.
ASHEVILLE & CHARLOTTE REGULATORY
FIELD OFFICES
US Army Corps of Engineers
151 Patton Avenue, Room 208
Asheville, North Carolina 28801-5006
General Number: [phone]
Fax Number: [phone]
RALEIGH REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587
General Number: [phone]
Fax Number: [phone]
INSTRUCTIONS:
WASHINGTON REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
2407 West Fifth Street
Washington, North Carolina 27889
General Number: [phone]
Fax Number: [phone]
WILMINGTON REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
69 Darlington Avenue
Wilmington, North Carolina 28403
General Number: 910-251-4633
Fax Number: [phone]
All requestors must complete Parts A, B, C, D, E, F and G.
NOTE TO CONSULTANTS AND AGENCIES: If you are requesting a JD on behalf of a
paying client or your agency, please note the specific submittal requirements in Part H.
NOTE ON PART D — PROPERTY OWNER AUTHORIZATION: Please be aware that
all JD requests must include the current property owner authorization for the Corps to
proceed with the determination, which may include inspection of the property when
necessary. This form must be signed by the current property owner(s) or the owner(s)
authorized agent to be considered a complete request.
NOTE ON PART D - NCDOT REQUESTS: Property owner authorization/notification for
JD requests associated with North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT)
projects will be conducted according to the current NCDOT/USACE protocols.
NOTE TO USDA PROGRAM PARTICIPANTS: A Corps approved or preliminary JD
may not be valid for the wetland conservation provisions of the Food Security Act of
1985. If you or your tenant are USDA Program participants, or anticipate participation in
USDA programs, you should also request a certified wetland determination from the local
office of the Natural Resources Conservation Service, prior to starting work.
Version: May 2017 Page 1

Jurisdictional Determination Request
A. PARCEL INFORMATION
Street Address: Multiple Parcels between Forlines Rd and Pitt Community College
City, State:
County:
Winterville, NC
Pitt
Parcel Index Number(s) (PIN): Multiple PIN's
B. REQUESTOR INFORMATION
Name:
James Mason
Mailing Address:
324 Blackwell Street, Suite 1200
Durham, NC 27701
Telephone Number:
[phone]
Electronic Mail Address:
[e-mail]
Select one:
❑ I am the current property owner.
✓❑ I am an Authorized Agent or Environmental Consultanti
❑ Interested Buyer or Under Contract to Purchase
❑ Other, please explain.
C. PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION
Name:
Greenville Utilities Commission, ATTN David Springer, PE
Mailing Address:
PO BOX 1847
Greenville, NC 27835
Telephone Number:
[phone]
Electronic Mail Address:
[e-mail]
1 Must provide completed Agent Authorization Form/Letter.
2 Documentation of ownership also needs to be provided with request (copy of Deed, County GIS/Parcel/Tax Record).
Version: May 2017 Page 2

Jurisdictional Determination Request
D. PROPERTY ACCESS CERTIFICATION',4
By signing below, I authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers (Corps) to enter upon the property herein described for the purpose of conducting on -
site investigations, if necessary, and issuing a jurisdictional determination pursuant to Section
404 of the Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899. I, the
undersigned, am either a duly authorized owner of record of the property identified herein, or
acting as the duly authorized agent of the owner of record of the property.
James Mason
Print Name
Capacity: ❑ Owner
9/8/2020
❑✓ Authorized Agents
Date James Digitally signed by James
Mason
Mason Date:2021.08.26
15:22:43 -04'00'
Signature
E. REASON FOR JD REQUEST: (Check as many as applicable)
❑ I intend to construct/develop a projector perform activities on this parcel which would be
designed to avoid all aquatic resources.
❑ I intend to construct/develop a projector perform activities on this parcel which would be
designed to avoid all jurisdictional aquatic resources under Corps authority.
✓❑ I intend to construct/develop a projector perform activities on this parcel which may
require authorization from the Corps, and the JD would be used to avoid and minimize
impacts to jurisdictional aquatic resources and as an initial step in a future permitting
process.
❑ I intend to construct/develop a projector perform activities on this parcel which may
require authorization from the Corps; this request is accompanied by my permit application
and the JD is to be used in the permitting process.
❑ I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities in a navigable water of the
U.S. which is included on the district Section 10 list and/or is subject to the ebb and flow of
the tide.
A Corps JD is required in order obtain my local/state authorization.
I intend to contest jurisdiction over a particular aquatic resource and request the Corps
confirm that jurisdiction does/does not exist over the aquatic resource on the parcel.
❑ I believe that the site may be comprised entirely of dry land.
❑ Other:
3 For NCDOT requests following the current NCDOT/USACE protocols, skip to Part E.
4 If there are multiple parcels owned by different parties, please provide the following for each additional parcel on a
continuation sheet.
5 Must provide agent authorization form/letter signed by owner(s).
Version: May 2017 Page 3

Jurisdictional Determination Request
F. JURISDICTIONAL DETERNIINATION (JD) TYPE (Select One)
❑✓ I am requesting that the Corps provide a preliminary JD for the property identified herein.
A Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination (PJD) provides an indication that there may
be "waters of the United States" or "navigable waters of the United States"on a property.
PJDs are sufficient as the basis for permit decisions. For the purposes of permitting, all
waters and wetlands on the property will be treated as if they are jurisdictional "waters of
the United States". PJDs cannot be appealed (33 C.F.R. 331.2); however, a PJD is
"preliminary" in the sense that an approved JD can be requested at any time. PJDs do
not expire.
❑ I am requesting that the Corps provide an approved JD for the property identified herein.
An Approved Jurisdictional Determination (AJD) is a determination that
jurisdictional "waters of the United States" or "navigable waters of the United
States" are either present or absent on a site. An approved JD identifies the limits of
waters on a site determined to be jurisdictional under the Clean Water Act and/or
Rivers and Harbors Act. Approved JDs are sufficient as the basis for permit
decisions. AJDs are appealable (33 C.F.R. 331.2). The results of the AJD will be
posted on the Corps website. A landowner, permit applicant, or other "affected
party" (33 C.F.R. 331.2) who receives an AJD may rely upon the AJD for five years
(subject to certain limited exceptions explained in Regulatory Guidance Letter 05-
02).
❑ I am unclear as to which JD I would like to request and require additional information
to inform my decision.
G. ALL REQUESTS
Map of Property or Project Area. This Map must clearly depict the boundaries of the
I I review area.
✓❑ Size of Property or Review Area 1 0.7 acres.
❑ The property boundary (or review area boundary) is clearly physically marked on the site.
Version: May 2017 Page 4

Jurisdictional Determination Request
H. REQUESTS FROM CONSULTANTS
Project Coordinates (Decimal Degrees): Latitude:
35.544383
Longitude:-77.42044
zA legible delineation map depicting the aquatic resources and the property/review area.
Delineation maps must be no larger than 1 Ix 17 and should contain the following: (Corps
signature of submitted survey plats will occur after the submitted delineation map has been
reviewed and approved).6
■ North Arrow
■ Graphical Scale
■ Boundary of Review Area
■ Date
■ Location of data points for each Wetland Determination Data Form or tributary
assessment reach.
For Approved Jurisdictional Determinations:
■ Jurisdictional wetland features should be labeled as Wetland Waters of the US, 404
wetlands, etc. Please include the acreage of these features.
■ Jurisdictional non -wetland features (i.e. tidal/navigable waters, tributaries,
impoundments) should be labeled as Non -Wetland Waters of the US, stream, tributary,
open water, relatively permanent water, pond, etc. Please include the acreage or linear
length of each of these features as appropriate.
■ Isolated waters, waters that lack a significant nexus to navigable waters, or non -
jurisdictional upland features should be identified as Non -Jurisdictional. Please
include a justification in the label regarding why the feature is non jurisdictional (i.e.
"Isolated", "No Significant Nexus", or "Upland Feature"). Please include the acreage
or linear length of these features as appropriate.
For Preliminary Jurisdictional Determinations:
Wetland and non -wetland features should not be identified as Jurisdictional, 404,
Waters of the United States, or anything that implies jurisdiction. These features can be
identified as Potential Waters of the United States, Potential Non -wetland Waters of
the United States, wetland, stream, open water, etc. Please include the acreage and
linear length of these features as appropriate.
Completed Wetland Determination Data Forms for appropriate region
(at least one wetland and one upland form needs to be completed for each wetland type)
6 Please refer to the guidance document titled "Survey Standards for Jurisdictional Determinations" to ensure that the
supplied map meets the necessary mapping standards. http://www.saw.usace.army.mil/Missions/Regulatory-Permit-
Pro gram/Jurisdiction/
Version: May 2017 Page 5

Jurisdictional Determination Request
F4Completed appropriate Jurisdictional Determination form
• PJDs, please complete a Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Form' and include the
Aquatic Resource Table
• AJDS• please complete an Approved Jurisdictional Determination Forma
W1 Vicinity Map
zAerial Photograph
z USGS Topographic Map
Soil Survey Map
zOther Maps, as appropriate (e.g. National Wetland Inventory Map, Proposed Site
Plan, previous delineation maps, LIDAR maps, FEMA floodplain maps)
Landscape Photos (if taken)
0 NCSAM and/or NCWAM Assessment Forms and Rating Sheets
❑ NC Division of Water Resources Stream Identification Forms
�J Other Assessment Forms
' www.saw.usace.army.mil/Portals/59/docs/regulatory/readocs/JD/RGL 08-02_App A Prelim JD_ Form_fillable.pdf
s Please see http://www.saw.usace.4M.mil/Missions/ReaWatory-Permit-Program/Jurisdiction/
Principal Purpose: The information that you provide will be used in evaluating your request to determine
whether there are any aquatic resources within the project area subject to federaljurisdiction under the regulatory
authorities referenced above.
Routine Uses: This information may be shared with the Department of Justice and other federal, state, and local
government agencies, and the public, and may be made available as part of a public notice as required by federal
law. Your name and property location where federal jurisdiction is to be determined will be included in the
approved jurisdictional determination (AJD), which will be made available to the public on the District's website
and on the Headquarters USAGE website.
Disclosure: Submission of requested information is voluntary; however, if information is not provided, the
request for an AJD cannot be evaluated nor can an AJD be issued.
Version: May 2017 Page 6

Appendix 2 - PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (PJD) FORM
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR PJD:
B. NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERSON REQUESTING PJD: James Mason, 324 Blackwell St, Suite 1200, Durham, NC 27701
C. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER: Wilmington, SAW-2020-01578
D. PROJECT LOCATION(S) AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
(USE THE TABLE BELOW TO DOCUMENT MULTIPLE AQUATIC RESOURCES AND/OR
AQUATIC RESOURCES AT DIFFERENT SITES)
State: NC County/parish/borough: Pitt City: Greenville
Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format):
Lat.: 35.544383 Long.:-77.42044
Universal Transverse Mercator: 18
Name of nearest waterbody: Swift Creek
E. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
❑ Office (Desk) Determination. Date:
❑ Field Determination. Date(s):
TABLE OF AQUATIC RESOURCES IN REVIEW AREA WHICH "MAY BE" SUBJECT TO REGULATORY
JURISDICTION.
Site
number
Latitude
(decimal
degrees)
Longitude
(decimal
degrees)
Estimated amount
of aquatic resource
in review area
(acreage and linear
feet, if applicable)
Type of aquatic
resource (i.e., wetland
vs. non -wetland
waters)
Geographic authority
to which the aquatic
resource "may be"
subject (i.e., Section
404 or Section 10/404)
See
Attached
List

Aquatic resources in the review area which "mav be" subiect to rei!ulatory iurisdiction
Estimated
amount of
Geographic
Site Number
Latitude
Longitude
aquatic
Type of aquatic
authority to which
resource in
resource
the aquatic resource
review area (l.f.
"may be" subject
& ac.
Potentially
Swift Creek
35.540859
-77.4420137
1501.E
Jurisdictional Non-
Section 404
wetland Water
Potentially
Gum Swamp
35.54076
-77.420237
11 1.£
Jurisdictional Non-
Section 404
wetland Water
Potentially
SA
35.545306
-77.420012
521.f.
Jurisdictional Non-
Section 404
wetland Water
Potentially
SB
35.549647
-77.417871
42 l.£
Jurisdictional Non-
Section 404
wetland Water
Potentially
SC
35.546349
-77.419117
71.f.
Jurisdictional Non-
Section 404
wetland Water
Potentially
SD
35.548209
-77.41839
421.f.
Jurisdictional Non-
Section 404
wetland Water
Potentially
SE
35.549792
-77.41766
13 l.f.
Jurisdictional Non-
Section 404
wetland Water
Potentially
SF
35.552419
-77.414838
541.f.
Jurisdictional Non-
Section 404
wetland Water
Potentially
WA
35.537550
-77.418673
0.01 ac.
Jurisdictional
Section 404
Wetland Water
Potentially
WB
35.539670
-77.419329
0.66 ac.
Jurisdictional
Section 404
Wetland Water
Potentially
WC
35.542545
-77.420846
0.89 ac.
Jurisdictional
Section 404
Wetland Water
Potentially
WD
35.544867
-77.420269
<0.01 ac.
Jurisdictional
Section 404
Wetland Water
Potentially
WE
35.548089
-77.418474
0.78 ac.
Jurisdictional
Section 404
Wetland Water
Potentially
WF
35.551130
-77.416207
0.96 ac.
Jurisdictional
Section 404
Wetland Water
Potentially
PA
35.544714
-77.420674
0.20 ac.
Jurisdictional Non-
Section 404
wetland Water (Open
Water

1) The Corps of Engineers believes that there may be jurisdictional aquatic resources in
the review area, and the requestor of this PJD is hereby advised of his or her option
to request and obtain an approved JD (AJD) for that review area based on an
informed decision after having discussed the various types of JDs and their
characteristics and circumstances when they may be appropriate.
2) In any circumstance where a permit applicant obtains an individual permit, or a
Nationwide General Permit (NWP) or other general permit verification requiring "pre -
construction notification" (PCN), or requests verification for a non -reporting NWP or
other general permit, and the permit applicant has not requested an AJD for the
activity, the permit applicant is hereby made aware that: (1) the permit applicant has
elected to seek a permit authorization based on a PJD, which does not make an
official determination of jurisdictional aquatic resources; (2) the applicant has the
option to request an AJD before accepting the terms and conditions of the permit
authorization, and that basing a permit authorization on an AJD could possibly result
in less compensatory mitigation being required or different special conditions; (3) the
applicant has the right to request an individual permit rather than accepting the terms
and conditions of the NWP or other general permit authorization; (4) the applicant can
accept a permit authorization and thereby agree to comply with all the terms and
conditions of that permit, including whatever mitigation requirements the Corps has
determined to be necessary; (5) undertaking any activity in reliance upon the subject
permit authorization without requesting an AJD constitutes the applicant's acceptance
of the use of the PJD; (6) accepting a permit authorization (e.g., signing a proffered
individual permit) or undertaking any activity in reliance on any form of Corps permit
authorization based on a PJD constitutes agreement that all aquatic resources in the
review area affected in any way by that activity will be treated as jurisdictional, and
waives any challenge to such jurisdiction in any administrative or judicial compliance
or enforcement action, or in any administrative appeal or in any Federal court; and (7)
whether the applicant elects to use either an AJD or a PJD, the JD will be processed
as soon as practicable. Further, an AJD, a proffered individual permit (and all terms
and conditions contained therein), or individual permit denial can be administratively
appealed pursuant to 33 C.F.R. Part 331. If, during an administrative appeal, it
becomes appropriate to make an official determination whether geographic
jurisdiction exists over aquatic resources in the review area, or to provide an official
delineation of jurisdictional aquatic resources in the review area, the Corps will
provide an AJD to accomplish that result, as soon as is practicable. This PJD finds
that there "may be" waters of the U.S. and/or that there "may be" navigable waters of
the U.S. on the subject review area, and identifies all aquatic features in the review
area that could be affected by the proposed activity, based on the following
information:

SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for PJD (check all that apply)
Checked items should be included in subject file. Appropriately reference sources
below where indicated for all checked items:
■❑ Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor:
Map:Vicinity Map, Topographic Map, Aerial Map, LiDAR Map
0 Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor.
❑ Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report.
❑ Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report. Rationale:
❑ Data sheets prepared by the Corps:
❑ Corps navigable waters' study:
❑ U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas:
❑ USGS NHD data.
❑ USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps.
■❑ U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name: 1:24,000 2019 Greenville SW, North Carolina
■❑ Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation: 1974 Pitt County Soil Survey
❑ National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name:
❑ State/local wetland inventory map(s):
❑ FEMA/FIRM maps:
El
■❑
100-year Floodplain Elevation is:
Photographs: ■❑ Aerial (Name & Date):
or ❑ Other (Name & Date):
.(National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929)
NCOneMap Orthoimagery
❑ Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter:
Other information (please specify): On9lnaI sewer line (Project No.9CP-67) was completed around1999 and received several NWPs In the Past authorizing its construction.
IMPORTANT NOTE: The information recorded on this form has not necessarily
been verified by the Corps and should not be relied upon for later jurisdictional
determinations.
Signature and date of
Regulatory staff member
completing PJD
James Digitally signed by James
Mason
Mason Date:2021.08.26
15:23:56-04'00'
Signature and date of
person requesting PJD
(REQUIRED, unless obtaining
the signature is impracticable)'
' Districts may establish timeframes for requestor to return signed PJD forms. If the requestor does not respond
within the established time frame, the district may presume concurrence and no additional follow up is
necessary prior to finalizing an action.

!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
`.........
((((
rr((((((!((!!(
§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§
!
�\,
cadges