NC0026913_wasteload allocation_19820816

Facility Name:
'a Existing
Proposed
NPDES WASTE LOAD ALLOCATION
Date: �C24 7 F/
Permit No.: it!nfh0 2‘913 Pipe No.: eV/ County: •�/����}�v
eu
Design Capacity (MGD): .25 Industrial of Flow): �+— (%Domestic (% of. Flow) :
Receiving Stream: L/7i�/E r'Gy
Class: Sub -Basin: QS D7 so2
wN
Reference USGS Quad: 314 1.1e, (Please attach) Requestor: .4a%'l,�l-
q �' Regional
(Guideline limitations, if applicable, are to be listed on the back of this form.)
Design Temp •
7Q10:. r7 cf.,
au
oLocation of D.O.minimum (miles below outfall):
2 • c
0
w
0
N
a)
1
Drainage Area: 3 101,14' Z"' Avg. Streamflow: 5-S
Winter 7Q10: 30Q2 • -"--°'
t1 Slope • .��
Velocity (fps) : 01"l -7 Kl (base e, per day, 20°C) : _ . SVZ 1 K2 (base e, per day, 20°C) : ®q► Rs
Effluent
Characteristics
-Monthly
Average
Comments
.$ D Ps
30„�►
TSS
�
30 /L
Original Allocation
--,Revised Allocation
Prepared By: , 2 104.4/
Effluent '
Characteristics
Monthly
Average
Comments
Date(s) of Revision(s)
(Please attach previous allocation)
• 4r-f--1--
PA)
Reviewed By:
Date:

EQLlES T NO, 4-38
DRAINAGE AREA
4*:? :**********:******* WA TEL.O .ii ALLOCATION APPROVAL FORM ***MVO* _ , :».*#:s:
FACILITY NAME SF•ARTA ww'rP
TYPE OF WASTE E DOMES r I ::
COUNTY r1LL.E6Herr-!Y
REGIONAL L OFFICE W1NSTON—SALEM
RECEIVING STREAM LITTLE Re
0i0 : 17 CFS Wi701.0 e
34.00 SGariI
C E S
RECEIVED
North Piedmont
Regional Office
JUL 27 1982
WATER QUALITY DIV. -
RE( UES `OR : R. BAIRD
SUBBASIN a 05_..07...03
306.2 .
STREAM CLASS
CPS
4*#***** :.***** ::**#*# RECOMMENDED E F'L.JEi T LIMITS * ****** .:.:i�:: : **..r*4*4
HiiS 1 Er• L.OW (. a) (MGD ) e 0.2b
bi iD —5 t 31G:' L) f 3(.
NH -N , MiG L.) e NR
tfL ++••e 1 L r r_+1 t_i e ! 1 F
� .. R
PH
,U) aa c—
l': w (MG/ ) e 30
PLEASE SEE ATTACHED MEMO WHICH
DISCUSSES OMISSION OF F',I C#L
L.I.r IT.
**.4.*4** 4*4 *4:*4 ******4**:€.*:: *:********4*:4*4#..4***#44:44******4444.44*:4::*:444:;t::44:*
FACILITY IS : PROPOSED ( ;; EXISTING (' NEW ( )
LIMITS A R E REVISION
REVIEWED AND RECOMMENDED BY,
CONFIRMATION ( i OF THOSE PS'EVIGUSL. ISSUED
MODELER / I L , t____DATE4 > 7 Z
L s
SIJF'ERVISOR MOIIELING GROUP «... __� �. DATE �a P
REGIONAL. SUPERVISOR i _....[�.:... - __DATE s_
_
PERMITS MANAGE; _,� ��. G__...__._.;tAf
APPROVED BY a
DIVISION DIRECTOR
.ATE 1�.

DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
July 21, 1982
MEMORANDUM
TO: Reggie Baird
FROM: Mark Lewis ba:•
SUBJECT: Wasteload Allocation
Town of Sparta
North Piedmont
Regional OffQ,s
JUL 27 19
WATER QUALITY DIY,
The Town of Sparta has requested that the fecal coliform limit be
deleted from their present permit which was issued on February 26, 1982.
There is very little data on which to asses the impact of a nondisinfected
effluent on the Little River. The monthly self -monitoring reports
contain no fecal coliform values.
Using the highest range of the upstream 7Q10 estimate, the requirement
of a fecal coliform limit for Sparta becomes questionable. It is not
clear as to whether or not water quality violations will occur.
It is recommended that at this time the fecal coliform limit be
omitted from the present permit. However, it is requested that weekly
monitoring of fecal coliform at upstream, downstream and effluent be
included. This additional data will aid us in conducting a future analysis
of the impact that this nondisinfected discharge has on the Little River.
Attached is a approval form reflecting the requested change.
ML:cs
Attachment

5 UV, D 7 . /l - 2%-$,
For*#001 ' #I79
WASTE LOAD ALLOCATION APPROVAL FORM
Facility Name: Town of Sparta WWTP
County: Alleghany Sub -basin: 05.07-03 4 �;
Regional Office: .Winston-Salem Requestor: Abdul Ha$ TA ', '`
Type of Wastewater: Industrial %
Domestic y
If industrial, specify type(s) of industry:
d,
Receiving stream: Little River r—,„-- Class: C
Other stream(s) affected: Class:
7Q10 flow at point of discharge: _ 17 cis
30Q2 flow at point of discharge:
Natural stream drainage area at discharge point:
34 s4. mi..
Recommended Effluent Limitations
Qw = 0.25 MGD
BOD5 = 3(1 mg/1
TSS = 30_ mg/1
pFi = 6-9 S.U.
Fecal Coliform = 1000/100 ml
As dilution is approximately 44 to 1 the fecal limits can be dropped.
l.. 7 -e
YY 2r
This allocation is: / / for proposed facility
t / for a new (existing) facility
r/ a revision of existing limitations
/171 a confirmation of existing limitations
Recommended and reviewed by:
Head, Techncial Services Branch , I)
Reviewed by: y ��
Regional Supervisor
Permits Manager Ct, . C L.
Approved by:
Division Director
/A/ Date: //—/o--q1
Date: /1"
Date://
Date:
Date: /