20130802 Ver 1_General Correspondence_20131028

FRAC-OUT REPORT Octoh ®r 2E; 2 013
Eno River,(Feature E) Frac -Out Report,
.PSNC' North Durham Pipeline Project
Durham County,; North Carolina,
.lame and company off'porson reporting frac -out: Chris Simmons (American
Underground Boring_ Project Manager) _, Contractor for PSNC: Cell phone number is
954 -214 -4934.
Responsl6le-party: ,American Underground Boring from, Rockmart, iQeorgia.
Contractor perfonrhing, HOD: American Underground, Boring
Date,andf tinie.ofIrac -out: Saturday, Ottober,26, 2013 4:OO:pm.
Flow was •frac -out detected:° American ,'Underground Boring, personnel noticed,
°turbid�vJater forming iii;two ="small areas at the water4and iriterface in the Eno River.,
Location of the frac -out: Feature 'E,(Eno River) Station',215 +75.'See,attached map.
Type of material: _Bentonite,clay and water slurry'—standard.HDD drilling,-mud.,
Description of frac -out and efforts to protect,sensitive areas: 'The drilling
operation was stopped'immediately uponhoticing the'turbid,water forming in'two,azeas.
T61nTerez;(S&ME Environmental Inspector)�was contacted immediately;, and sand bags
were• brought into dam up the areas an d , provide containment: Walier,Cole (S &ME
Environmental Scientist) reported incident to Cherri Smith of the,North Carolina
Department,of Water Resources,,aV9:15 am on Monday October 28, 2013. WaltevCole
and- Tom ;Perersperformed,an,inspection, together, asses-sing, the, containment measures,
and �d'ocumenting conditions. A vac -truck was, brought,in on Monday, October28`�' and
the turbid watei within,the contaihmentoareas was removed and properly disposed of
R
Estimated size, of ,frac- out,(quantity, and' area): The impacted area 1 measured
approximately30 feet,I- ng and 20 feet;wide and impact'azea 2' measured'1 "5 feet long by
1'S feet wide. The •quantity of drill mud is difficult to estimate'becauseino visible drilling
mud was noticed, "there was only turbid water.
Proposed additional' HDD• activities: 'The initial pilot hole was approximately 520
feet of ,the designed length (920 feet). The drilling, operation will' restart onl October, 29,
201'3: _
Proposed final cleanup'rmethod': On completion °ofHDD,activities; American -
' Underground,Boring will remove any, drilling mudand turbid water within containment.
areas. The, mud may require,removal•by hand orVacuum truck. Upon c_ompletion,of
clean -up activities, sand bags and otheracontairiment materials will•also be removed.

Party.responsibib for cleanup: _American °Underground'Boring:
Cdnersl comments: It,�appears;thai the turbid water (no drilling niud)' has been`.
contained within,the�descr`ibed' area'by the;hay bales. The contractor-stopped drilling
operation, acted'ingood.faith.to contain the turbidwater,.and immediately notified
environmental- monitors: The contractor and inspectors should' remain „afert for rain
events and7should take actions necessary to contain drill mu&turbid water in.impacted' ,
'area. Efforts to cleanup the impacted should.sta_ rt,as soon as practical' following bore
cgmpl_`etiori.
Attachihent:,Frac- Out.geport :Site, Photographs 1 -8:
s

Photo 1: View of frac -out location 1 and sand bag dam
containment measures, no drilling mud detected, only turbid
water.
Photo 3: View of bypass channel out through existing sand bar
to allow water to bypass around frac -out areas.
Photo 2: View of frac -out location 2 and sand bag dam
containment measures.
Photo 4: View of clear running water immediately downstream
of frac-out areas.
Taken by: WC FRAC -OUT CLEAN UP REPORT
SITE PHOTOGRAPHS (10.28.13)
Checked by: WC ME PSNC > Durham Pipeline Project —Eno River
Date: 10.28.13 Oran a County, North Carolina
Project No.: 1356 -13 -019 P8 Photo Page 1 of 2

Photo 5: Close -up View of frac -out location 2 and sand bag
dam containment measures, no drilling mud detected, only
slightly turbid water.
Photo 6: Another view of frac -out location 1, sand bag dam
containment measures and turbid water that is being removed
by a vac - truck.
Photo 7: Overall view of both frac -out locations, sand bag dam Photo 8: View of frac -out location 2 after vac -truck removal.
containment measures, and air pump for vacuuming area.
Taken by: WC FRAC -OUT CLEAN UP REPORT
SITE PHOTOGRAPHS (10.28.13)
Checked by: WC PSNC N. Durham Pipeline Project — Eno River
Date: 10.28.13 Durham County, North Carolina
Project No.: 1356 -13 -019 P8 I Photo Page 2 of 2

FRAC -OUT REPORT Octob6r 25,, 2 ®13
,Stream L- Frac -Out Report PSNC Duke'Pipeline Project
Orange County,'North Carolina
Name and company of,person reporting: frac -out: Tommy Thigpen'(Hi'Tech
Construction Project Manager)— Contractor`for PSNC. Cell phone number is 352 -232-
-5660.
Responsible party:- Hi'Tech Construction.
Contractor' perform! hg,HDD: Hi Tech Construction from'Myrt_le'Beach, South,
Carolina.
Date and time of free =out: 'Friday,, October 25, 2013 at 4:30 pm., _
How was frac-o ut, detected: Hi Tech Construction personnel noticed Wurbid water
forming in existing, °scour pit located below, the outlet end of culvert during drilling,
activities.
Location of the frac -out: Streani,L at.Station 342 +25. See,attached map.
Type ,of material:' Bentonite clay-and water slurry — standard,H'DD drilling mud..
Description offrac -out and efforts to protect,sensitive areas: The drilling,
operation was,st ,poed immediately upon,not.icingthe turbid. water'forming, in, the +scour
pit;and'Tom,Perez (S &ME Environmental,lnspector) was contacted., Hay bales were
,brought_ in to dam up the scour pit aazea providing,a containment area, and, sand 'lbags were
brought'in and placed in.th6- outlet end of the4cufvert to dam the smalL,amount of -flow'
tluough the,culvert: A PVC pipewas;,,btoughtinto temporarily; f]ume,the very small_
amount. of flow through the culvert- over -the containment are bypassing the frac -out area
for clean water coming through °the culvert. Walter Cole (S&ME Environmental
4S6ientist) reported incident to Chem Smith- of the`North Carolina Department of.Water
ResourcesAt'9:15 °am,on Monday October, 28, 2013: Walter Cole and Tom Perez
performed an inspection together, assessing the containment ,'measures and documenting
,conditions! A vac- truck. was brought in on October 28, 30,13 and the-turbid waterdwithin
the containment area' was removed, and properly, disposed.
Estimated size of,frae -out (quantity 'and�area): The4mpacted area measured
approximately 20, feet.long,and ,15 feet wide., The .quantity of-drill' mud is difficult-to
estimate because, no. visible drilling, mud was noticed, there was only turbid,waten
Proposed additional ADD °activities: The =initial pilot hole Was approzimatel'y`580
feet of the designed length.(800 feet).,The drilling,operation °will,restart on',October 28,
2013.

Proposer f nal cleanup method; On i completion of HDD,activities, H Tech
Construction will remove any drilling,mud.and turbid °water°within coniainmenvarea.
The mud.rriayirequire removal by,harid of yacuurn,truck.. 'Upon,,completion of clean -up
'activities, hay bales, sand 'bags, and other containment materials will also be removed:
Party responsiblerfor cleanup:. •Hi Tech,Construction,
General comments :, It appears that1he,tur"bid water (no drilling,,mud)Ias'been
contained within the describe&area by the hay bales. The contractor stopped drilling
operation, acted in :good, faith to contain the, turbid, water -, and immediately - notified
environmental monitors. The contractor and, ingpectots,sliould',remain,alert for rain
events and should take actions necessary to' contain, drill mud/turbid°waterlin impacted'
area Effortslo clean�ugthe impacted,should start asfsoon,as practical following`bore
completion.
Attachment: Frac -Out Repott'Site Photographs 1 -4.
{

.a
s.
_ s
FKAG -OUT GLEAN UP REPOfi
&ME SITE PHOTOGRAPHS (10.28.1
PSNC Duke Pipeline Project — Stream L
A