The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About20131162 Ver 1_Application_20131101� ��o� � STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA DEPAR'I'MENT OF 'TRANSPORTATTON PaT L. MCCxoxY GOVERNOR November 1, 2013 Mr. Stephen Kichefski Asheville Regulatory Field Office US Army Corp of Engineers 151 Patton Avenue Asheville, NC 28801-5006 ANTHONYJ.TATA SECRETARY SUBJECT: Bridge #465 Replacement on SR 1810 (Mitch Road), Iredell County Dear Mr. Kichefski: The North Cazolina Department of Transportation requests authorization to replace a deteriorating timber bridge on SR 1810 (Mitch Road) in Iredell County. NCDOT proposes to replace Bridge #465 with a 48-foot, 14-ft x 5-ft bottomless azch culvert on new alignment. Approximately 128 feet of new cha�mel will be constructed following natural channel design principles. (This includas the stream section where the 48-ft bottomless culvert is located). A total of 127 feet of old channel will be filled. Due to the transition from the old channel to new channel being located 'm a meander bend, approximately 30 feet of the upstream section of newly constructed bank will be riprapped to provide additional armoring at the "plug" of the old channel. Riprap will also be utilized at the downstream "plug" of the old ohannel; however, the armoring will be done at the back of the construcYed floodplain bench and will be above average high water. Natural streambed material will be salvaged from the old bed to be utilized in the new coir fiber lined constructed channel. The stream flow to be maintained in old channel during new channel construction. Temporary cofferdams/bypass pumping to be ufilized in fmal stages when tie in to e�sting channel occurs. All areas affected by temporary cofferdam system will be restored to pre-project conditions. The scope of the work involves an unnamed tributary to Hunting Creek, which is classified as W5-III Waters by the Division of Water Quality. A survey was conducted Apri12012 for federally listed species for Iredell County (USFWS listed dated September 22, 2010), which include the dwatf-flowered heartleaf (Hexastylis naniflora) and the bog turtle (Clemmys muhdenbergii). Suitable habitat for the bog turtle does not exist in the project study area. 5uitable habitat for the dwarf-flowered heartleaf was determined to be present within the project study area and a heaztleaf species (Hexastylis virganica) was found adjacent to the study area. Due to the absence of the species within the project area and the presence of a closely related species adjacent to the project area, it was determined that there will be no effect on the federally listed heartleaf species. Bridge # 465, SR 1810 Page 2 November 1, 2013 A cukural resources review of the area of potential impact was conducted. There aze no archaeological sites or historic properties wluch would be affected by the project. (Project Tracking No. 11-10-0022). The project area is not located within'/� mile of any critical watershed azea. SR 1810 is not a rural or urban arterial; therefore, hazazdous spill basins are not required. Enclosed is the hazazdous spill basin checklist. I have enclosed a pre-construcfion notificafion for a NW#14, sketches of planned activifies and location maps relative to the project. Project information for the 401 Automated Payment Procedure is as follows: • Work order number: 150461-55120005-17BP.12R.6-3372 • TIP#: NA • Project Category: $240.00 Fee If you have any questions or concerns please feel free to contact me at (704) 480-9044. Thank you for your time and consideraYion on this matter. Respectfully yours, M.L. Holder, P.E. Division Engineer Twelfth Division BY: ! �.�a/� <�Gr Trish Beam Division 12 Environmental Supervisor Enclosures cc: Alan Johnson, Division of Water Q�ality, Mooresville Regional Office � 4 WATFpP � �r > o c Office Use Only: Corps action ID no. DWQ project no. Form Version 1.3 Dec 10 2008 Pre-Construction Notification PC Form A. A licant Informafion 1. Processing 1 a. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps: � Section 404 Permit ❑ Section 10 Permit 1b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 14 or General Permit (GP) number: 1 c. Has the N WP or GP number been verified by the Corps? ❑ Yes � No 1d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply): � 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit ❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization 1 e. Is this notification solely for the record For the record only for DWQ 401 For the record only for Corps Permit: because written approval is not required? Certifcation: ❑ Yes � No ❑ Yes � No 1f. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in-lieu fee program proposed for mitigation � yes � No of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in-lieu fee program. 1g. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h ❑ Yes � No below. 1 h. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concem (AEC)? ❑ Yes � No 2. Project Information 2a. Name of project: SR 1810 (Mitch Road) 2b. County: Iredell 2c. Nearest municipality / town: Statesville 2d. Subdivision name: 2e. NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state 17BP.12R.6 project no: 3. Owner Information 3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed: NC DOT Right of Way 3b. Deed Book and Page No. 3c. Responsible Party (for LLC i f applicable): 3d. Street address: 3e. City, state, zip: 3f. Telephone no.: 3g. Fax no.: 3h. Email address: Page 1 of 11 PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version 4. Applicant Information (if different from owner) 4a. Applicant is: ❑ Agent ❑ Other, specify: 4b. Name: Mike Holder 4c. Busines s name N.C. Department of Transportation, Division 12 (if applicable): 4d. Street address: 1710 East Marion Street 4e. City, state, zip: Shelby, NC 28151 4f. Telephone no.: 704-480-9020 4g. Fax no.: 704-480-5401 4h. Email address: mholder@ncdot.gov 5. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable) 5a. Name: Trish Beam 5b. Business name N.C. Department of Transportation, Division 12 (if applicable): Sc. Street address: 1710 East Marion Street 5d. City, state, zip: Shelby, NC 28151 5e. Telephone no.: 704-480-9044 5f. Fax no.: 704-480-5401 5g. Email address: pdbeam@ncdot.gov Page 2 of 11 PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version B. Project Information and Prior Project History 1. Property Identification 1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID): NA 1 b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees): Latitude: 36.0371 Longitude: - 80.8640 (DD.DDDDDD) (-DD.DDDDDD) 1 c. Property size: <.10 acres 2. Surface Waters 2a. Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc.) to Ut to Hunting Creek proposed project: 2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water: WS-III 2c. River basin: Yadkin 3. Project Description 3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this application: Existing 19-foot timber deck span bridge on paved secondary road. Surrounding land use is designated forested and cropland/pasture. 3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property: 0 3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property: 200 feet 3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project: The purpose of the proposed work is to replace the deteriorating bridge for the safety of the travelling public. 3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used: The North Carolina Department of Transportation requests authorization to replace a deteriorating bridge on SR 1810 (Mitch Road) in Iredell County. NCDOT proposes to replace the existing 19-foot span timber deck bridge with a 48-foot, 14-ft x 5 ft Bottomless arch culvert on new alignment. Approximately 128 feet of new channel will be constructed (this includes the section which the 48 ft bottomless culvert will cover) following natural channel design principles. A total of 127 feet of old channel will be filled. Due to the transition from the old channel to new channel being located in a meander bend, approximately 30 feet of the upstream section of newly constructed bank will be riprapped to provide additional armoring at the "plug" of the old channel. A riprap plug will be utilized at the downstream end of the old channel; however, the armoring will be done at the back of the constructed floodplain bench and will be above average high water. Natural streambed material will be salvaged from the old bed to be utilized in the coir fber lined constructed channel. A temporary cofferdam pumping system will be used to divert the stream around the construction site as needed. Area affected by temporary cofferdam system will be graded and restored back to pre-project conditions. All Best Management Practices will be utilized during the course of the project. The Project will be constructed using typical heavy equipment (trackhoe, backhoe, etc.) 4. Jurisdictional Determinations 4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property ! project (including all prior phases) in the past? ❑ Yes � No ❑ Unknown Comments: Jurisdictional stream determination made by Division 12 DEO. 4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type of determination was made? ❑ Preliminary 0 Final 4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas? Agency/Consultant Company: Name (if known): Other: 4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation. Page 3 of 11 PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version 5. Project History 5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for � yes � No ❑ Unknown this project (including all prior phases) in the past? 5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions. 6. Future Project Plans 6a. Is this a phased project? ❑ Yes � No 6b. If yes, explain. Page 4 of 11 PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version C. Proposed Impacts Inventory 1. Impacts Summary 1 a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply): ❑ Wetlands � Streams - tributaries ❑ Buffers ❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction 2. Wetland Impacts If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted. 2a. 2b. 2c. 2d. 2e. 2f. Wetland impact Type ofjurisdiction number— Type of impact Type of wetland Forested (Corps - 404, 10 Area of impact Permanent (P) (if known) DWQ — non-404, other) (acres) orTem ora W1 ❑ P❑ T ❑ Yes ❑ Corps ❑ No ❑ DWQ W2 � P � T ❑ Yes ❑ Corps ❑ No ❑ DWQ W3 ❑ P❑ T ❑ Yes ❑ Corps ❑ No ❑ DWQ W4 ❑ P❑ T ❑ Yes ❑ Corps ❑ No ❑ DWQ W5 ❑ P 0 T ❑ Yes ❑ Corps ❑ No ❑ DWQ W6 ❑ P❑ T ❑ Yes ❑ Corps ❑ No ❑ DWQ 2g. Total wetland impacts 2h. Comments: 3. Stream Impacts If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this question for all stream sites impacted. 3a. 3b. 3c. 3d. 3e. 3f. 3g. Stream impact Type of impact Stream name Perennial Type ofjurisdiction Average Impact number - (PER) or (Corps - 404, 10 stream length Perma�ent (P) intermittent DWQ — non-404, width (linear orTemporary(T) (INT)? other) (feet) feet) New channel S1 � P❑ T C 48 foottbottol mless s Ut tC eekting � PER � Corps 10 128 ❑ INT � DWQ culvert on footings) S2 � P❑ T Old channel filled Ut to Hunting � PER � Corps 10 127 Creek ❑ INT � DWQ Riprap bank Ut to Hunting � PER � Corps S3 � P � T stabilization at'plug' of Creek ❑ INT � p�/�/(� 10 30 old channel S4 ❑ P� T Cofferdams/Temporary Ut to Hunting � PER � Corps g 40 bypass pumping Creek ❑ INT � DWQ S5 ❑ P❑ T ❑ PER ❑ Corps ❑ INT ❑ DWQ S6 ❑ P❑ T ❑ PER ❑ Corps ❑ INT ❑ DWQ 36. Total stream and tributary impacYS 30` 3i. Comments: Old channel length lost (127 feet) - New channel construction including 48 foot section of new stream which the bottomless arch culvert covers (128 feet) = 0 feet. " Permanent Riprap impacts at plug of old channel = 30 feet. Page 5 of 11 PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version 4. Open Water Impacts If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of the U.S. then individually list all open water impacts below. 4a. 4b. 4c. 4d. 4e. Open water Name of waterbody impact number (if applicable) Type of impact Waterbody type Area of impact (acres) — Permanent (P) or Tem ora T 01 ❑P❑T 02 ❑P❑T 03 ❑P❑T 04 ❑P❑T 4f. Total open water impacts � 4g. Comments: 5. Pond or Lake Construction If ond or lake construction ro osed, then com lete the chart below. Sa. 5b. 5c. Sd. 5e. Wetland Impacts (acres) Stream Impacts (feet) Upland Pond ID Proposed use or purpose of (acres) number pond Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded P1 P2 Sf. Total 5g. Comments: Sh. Is a dam high hazard permit required? ❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no: Si_ Expected pond surface area (acres): 5j. Size of pond watershed (acres): Sk. Method of construction: Page 6 of 11 PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version 6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ) If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts below. If an im acts re uire miti ation, then ou MUST fill out Section D of this form. 6a. ❑ Neuse ❑ Tar-Pamlico ❑ Other: Project is in which protected basin? ❑ Cataw6a ❑ Randleman 6b. 6c. 6d. 6e. 6f. 6g. Buffer impact number— Reason Buffer Zone 1 impact Zone 2 impact Permanent (P) for Stream name mitigation (square feet) (square feet) orTemporary impact required? T B1 ❑P❑T ❑Yes ❑ No B2 ❑P❑T ❑Yes ❑ No B3 ❑P❑T ❑Yes ❑ No 6h. Total buffer impacts 6i. Comments: D. Impact Justification and Mitigation 7. Avoidance and Minimization 1a. Specifcally describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project. New channel to be constructed following natural channel design principles. New channel and banks to be stabilized with coir fiber matting and salvage streambed material from old channel to be utilized in the new channel. 1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques. Stream flow to be maintained in old channel during new channel constructio�. Bypass pumping to be utilized in final stages when tie in to existing channel occurs. 2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State 2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for ❑ Yes � No impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State? 2b. If yes, mirigation is required by (check all that apply): ❑ DWQ ❑ Corps ❑ Mitigation bank 2c. If yes, which mitigat ion option will be used for this project? ❑ Payment to in-lieu fee program ❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation 3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank 3a. Name of Mitigation Bank: 3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter) Type Quantity Page 7 of 11 PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version 3c. Comments: 4. Complete if Making a Payment to In-lieu Fee Program 4a. Approval letter from in-lieu fee program is attached. ❑ Yes 4b. Stream mitigation requested: linearfeet 4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature: ❑ warm ❑ cool ❑cold 4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only): square feet 4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres 4f. Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres 4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested: acres 4h. Comments: 5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan 5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan. 6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ 6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires ❑ Yes � No buffer mitigation? 6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the amount of mitigation required. 6c. 6d. 6e. Zone Reason for impact Total impact Multiplier Required mitigation (square feet) (square feet) Zone 1 3(2 for Catawba) Zone 2 1.5 6f. Total buffer mitigation required: 6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank, permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in-lieu fee fund). 6h. Comments: Page 8 of 11 PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ) 1. Diffuse Flow Plan 1 a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified � yes � No within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules? 1 b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why. Comments: ❑ Yes ❑ No 2. Stormwater Mana ement Plan 2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project? 0% 2b. Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan? ❑ Yes � No 2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why: Complies with NCDOT's individual NPDES permit NCS000250. 2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan: ❑ Certified Local Government 2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan? ❑ DWQ Stormwater Program ❑ DWQ 401 Unit 3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review 3a. In which local governmenYs jurisdiction is this project? NA ❑ Phase II 3b. Which of the following locally-implemented stormwater management programs ❑ NSW apply (check all that apply): ❑ USMP ❑ Water Supply Watershed ❑ Other: 3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been ❑ Yes ❑ No attached? 4. DWQ Stormwater Pro ram Review ❑ Coastal counties ❑ HQW 4a. Which of the following state-implemented stormwater management programs apply � ORW (check all that apply): ❑ Session Law 2006-246 ❑ Other: 4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been attached? ❑ Yes ❑ No 5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review 5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements? ❑ Yes ❑ No 5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met? ❑ Yes ❑ No Page 9 of 11 PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version F. Supplementary Information 1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement) 1 a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the � Yes ❑ No use of public (federal/state) land? 1 b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State ❑ Yes � No (North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)? 1 c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter.) ❑ Yes ❑ No Comments: 2. Violations (DWQ Requirement) 2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surtace Water or Wetland Standards, ❑ Yes � No or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)? 2b. Is this an after-the-fact permit application? ❑ Yes � No 2c. If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s): 3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement) 3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in � yes � No additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality? 3b. If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description. The project is a minimum criteria project which has low potential for cumulative/indirect impacts and will not result in additional development which could impact water quality. 4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement) 4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility. No sewage generated from project. Page 10 of 11 PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version 5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement) 5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federaily protected species or � Yes � No habitat? Sb. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act � Yes � No impacts? ❑ Raleigh 5c. If yes, ind icate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted. ❑ Asheville 5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical Habitat? NC Natural Heritage Program database and on site field investigation. 6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement) 6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat? ❑ Yes � No 6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat? No salt marshes, oyster reefs, or seagrass beds in the vicinity of the project. 7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement) 7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation � yes � No status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in North Carolina history and archaeology)? 7b. What data sources did you use to determine whe[her your site would impact historic or archeological resources? Cultural Resources review (11-10-0022) HistoricArchitecture (10/20/11); Archaeological (11/3/11). 8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement) 8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain? ❑ Yes � No 8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements: 8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? FEMA FIRM panal number: 3710484300J i ��l .. � :1-I�o I � �-' ��% , - ��,� �� ° 1l �/ -l�3 ApplicanUAgenYs Printed Name ApplicanUAgent's Signature Date (Agenfs signature is valid only rf an authorization letter from the applicant is rovided.) Page 11 of 11 PCN Form — Versio� 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version Bridge #465 Replacement Mitch Road (SR 1810) Iredell County Vicinity Map N 0 0.5 1 2 Miles I i i i I i i i I � , � � � � � � , , -. 'r, . `� ' � , . . � ,� � � ; �� `�' � _ `��' � �`�� ; , . � r ,� ,. . � , , , ;i 3, `fiYC} `_.` T �." _. �'�i�1�iIN� `f,"�{) y . _-___ � -.... _ , _ � -�- - , I��k',�i�� l3-� T -�-=�, -:..�.� _ ' � ��,� � � . .� �c,l• ` � ,. �� , . ,, . . ; '.. °> : : �� , _ ��, - .... � , = _ ,�:_. _ _ . � � �, � ; � _ �,,.� �.'- ° v �, ,-� _,. . ^_y „ � .- ;,, .�..;, , �1 ^ � ' s I� ± .. � � . .. . f t . - . t' .. _ I. . � • <. � e � — _ • r� f•��, . � . ,. � . . . �. � 3 _ � .. �•'}iT'�ill�S:if� . . � .. `�_—E.... s • I"� . � � � �' �.C,T]� ,, � ��il7��t _ ° ' ` � �� -�- AR 9v8':'-" � _ � . �illy � ' � � . �i3t�� .`J , � . :` � �... � ., ' .9 , . �� , 7" � , '� .�\. ." ,�„ .. . � �2�:Pic"�C2iilE`,i,� � � _ rv . n: �.r ,� .� ,� , �, � � °� _ . . .�� '-r, . �,. . � �;� _ �... . 7 '�..�s , - ��. , . , - �. � . _.. , . � � . ,,.. '+ , .§ , ,. . , � .. , � � . . r ` � �, � � � � ° t � � �"6�� r � i . .. . - . i :::y;J '� e _ � > ., ; , . �.� . . . _ �,. ., . .i . ,' . _. . . � �..� � ,. ., . "I.. f f_... � �h �e � � n: ' +� Y • � .. . � � . . .. . . . . ... .I.� : 1. _ 1 . � � � �� + { a � I � � . U � I. ��. � �'. . � i �� tv.',=1 : . i�`: � : 7]'�.: � . •� .. � ,� .', � � . i • • +�KKt'-� _ �'> � . � . � ' rt. ...: �; � i � ,:� , y., . ; . , . . . y t � � ��nia�ai (;�+�r� � � , � ,- , - ; ., �.r v , $ � ,7 �� "�� . - � � ,��. � �°� _ � . � ., .�r - _ � �e,N . `u ., . �� . ;, . ., ... Name: BROOKS CROSSROADS Location: 036.0418074° N 080.8640329° W Date: 6/5/2013 Caption: Bridge #465 Replacement, SR 1510 (Mitch Rd), Iredell County, Scale: 1 inch equals 1333 feet UT to Hunting Creek, WS-III, Yadkin River Basin NCDOT HA7,ARDOUS SPILL BASIN CHECKLIST Division: 1� County: r,-e�tell Project ID: 17BP.12.R.6 River Basin: Yadkin Bridge No: 465 Route: SR 1810 Water Qualitv Criteria: Stream: Ut to Hunting Creek Stream Crossing Blue Line On USGS ORW WSI WS II,III OR IV, Crossing Within O.Smi of W.S. Critical Area Roadway Criteria: Route Designation- Arterial Urban Arterial Rural Additional Site Information: Is a Hazardous Spill Basin Required? Yes No W i� Yes No ! iJ Criteria Based Upon NCDOT "Best Management Practices for the Protection of Surface Waters" (March, 1997). Yes No y _. !J .. � � + + GUAR�RAIL RAIL RYP.1 RAODWAY FILL SLOPE VARIES � WING WALL �i� ROCK ft0A0WAY WIDTH = 20'-0" 74._0. �y._�. � SURVEY -L- � � I I I 0•�z � � TOP OF FOOTING !�EL909.6'c1. � I � CUWERT SLOPE = 0.0169YFT. � . (ALONG CHANNEU CULVERT SECTION NORMAL TO ROADWAY fY FILL VARIES � WING WALL � , ` � i� �RAWN BY : J�A pATE : 5/13 CHELkE� 8Y : RT,I DATE : 5/li PLAN asvs*IDEmu nssocxssssn.sss..s.ssa.sssss tssNSERHeuESSCS�� L POST PaCING �RAWING OF 12. END ELEVATION � CULVERT � � TOP OF FOOTING EL. 909.6' fJ � RIGHT ANGLE SECTION OF CON-SPAN ARCH CULVERT PRELIMINARY PLANS °"".°`° °, 145 EMLd[L0.S DO NOT USE FOR CONSTRUCITON 10�' °1u .vcxu[ YOP4�XIOX.X[ }i655 R Gl1NR�RAIL POST PACING E STAN�ARD DRnWING 2.01 SHT 10 OF ]2, TOP OF i'OOTING EL. 909.6' cil � PROJECT N0. 17BP.12.R.6 IREDELL COUNTY STATION: 12+00.50-L- 1EET 2 OF 2 SI�IE of xoPlx [1POtx1 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION PaLEGx 48'-0" x 5'-0" CON-SPAN ARCH CLILVERT OLtE� s-z FLOW SWll.L BE MAW7AINED IN EXISCING CHANNEL THROUGHOUT CONSTRUCTION OF THE PROPOSED Cl1LyERT. ANY COMAMINATED WATER WiMIN THE CONSTRUC110N SITE IYTO BE PUMPED INTO A SPECIAL STILLWG BASIN. SILT PENCE IS TO 6E PIACED AROUND STOCKPILE AND PROJECi AS WORK ALLOWS. UPON COMPLETION OF THE PROJECT ALL SRT FENCE IS TO BE PUaCED AS NEEDEB. SEED AND MULCH ALL DISTUkflED AREAS. EXISTING STRFAMBED MATERIAL TO BE EXCAVATED AN� STORED WR USE ALONG PROPOSED CHANNEL. COIR FIBEA MATI'ING TO BE PLP.CED ALONG PROPOSED STRFAMBEO AND PROPOSED BANKS.IXISTiNG STREAMBED MATERIAL EXCAVATED SHALL BE PLACED ON TOP OF COIR MATTING IN PROPOSED STREAM6ED. PROPOSED 2'SFANDARD BASE DITCH WITH � CLASS B RIPRAP LINER AND GEOTEXTILE EXISTING STREAM TO BE FILLED Td EXISTING TOP OF 6ANK ELEVATtON - APPROX. 127LF CLASS II R1P RAP TO FACE THE EDGE OF THE PROPOSED CHANNEL, EMBED TFiE ROCK INTO THE EXISTING STREAM6ED. SLOPE THE BAIdKS TO TIE INTO THE EXISTING CONTOURS. APPROX. 30LF � 9 UNNAMED TRIBUTARY TO HUNTING CREEK , PRQFOSEQ 24" DRAINAGE PIPE / 'L PROPOSED TOP OF � BANK PRqPOSED 1 @ 14'X5' BY 48' LONG CON-SPAN 70 DEG SKEW 30' 60' �o �'�'?� Co1R FIBER MATfING. �"J"JTjJ�FLOOD PW�1 BENCH LWED WITH ��J//aCOIR FIBER MATTING. EXISTING BRIDGE TO BE REMOVELI 7 EXI571NG STREAM TO BE FItLED TO EXISTING TOP OF BANK ELEVATION PROPOSED TOP OF BANK EXISTING TdP OF BANK Z v � � Z A �N N O J IXISTING TOP OF BANK TOTAL PROPOSED STREAM UPSTREAM OF CUIVERT 35LF TOTAL PROPOSED STREAM DOWNSTREAM Of CULVERT 45LF PROPOSED TOP OF BANK PROPOSED 2' STANDARD BASE D1TCH l2th DlV NCDOT REr"LACE BRIDGE WlTH CULVERT,BRIDGE ' 465 MITCN ROAD If7EDELL COUNTY WBS: l78PJ2.R.6 SR !8/0 /0// ��- 916' 915' 9.92' 914' 413' �• fll' na• v s• ia �s aa• �v am CROSS SECTION TAKEN APPROX BO' UPSTREAM FROM THE CENTERLINf OP THE CON-SPAN � ARCH. COIR FIBER MPSCING IXCAVATIOtJ — FILL e��'o FLOOD PLAIN � BENCFI [fYP.) � 50:7 ��>y� ��hr •°'i��l E `Y� ti :� f �7 �V 70. ' TYPICAL CHANNEL �{pNOT 70 SCALE)�R�� NG �� r Sa1L �� p14' 919' 10.0.9' T]' 911' 910' 909' 9U9' a• s' yo' �e' aa ss� aa• CROSS SEC170N TAKEN APPROX. tt0' DOWNSTREAM FROM THE CEMERLINE OF itiE CON-SPAN ARCH. GE6TEXTiLE CROSS SEG710N {HORtZONTAL] CftOSS SEGSION (VER7ICAL FILL CiASS ii RIP RAP � IXISTING 5TREAMBm OR � FLOODPWN BENCH iz° TYPICAL SIOPE PROTECTION AT EXISTfNG STREAM PLUG (NOT TO bCALE) 2l�� 0� � lp' 10' 0` �� 920 916 915 914 � 913 � 912 � 911 a"`° 910 909 908 90%122.5 916•. 915� 914! 913 912 911 910 909 908 907 EXSIT STREAM GRADIENT -- � i EXISTING BRIDGE 910.9 i I TO BE REMOVED i -909.1 I i EXSIT STREAM GRADIENT EXSIT STREAM GRADIENT 1.8/102.8 =1.75% � 909.1 908.2 q ! -908.2 -908.0 ------ q'�$ _ I 1 I i 0.9N0.7=0.99% 0.2/39.9=0.50% q' Iq. q. MATCH PT A _--�� q�Qb��._._ °'OQ�� O � , Q ----Q�� q��y Qp�� . _--_ `L o`�' � ----- --------q i-�---------- 95.5' S6.8' 35.9' 19J' ! 18.0' 36.9' S9.2' 90J' MATCH PT B 130.6' 913.�ti�` ��' �,�ti �: 912Q�--�'--�-°.�.__q��_ 911 �'-- EXSIT STREAM GRADIENT 912.4 -910.9 1.5/68.5 =2.19% 191.0' 176.0' 165.0' 156.0' w Z J � a �Q 122.5' PROP STREAM GRADIENT 910.9 �: -909.6 1ry� °j �__ o o. 7.3�3.5=2.43% _q�_I' -_ MATCH PT A -----_� q 124.0' 115.0' EXSIT STREAM GRADIENT 912.4 -910.9 1.5/68.5=2.19% 81.5' 74.9' z 28.0' J H 913 q1ti°` ,,y/'� �`ti 912 �--�-- 1ry 911 150.0' 135.0' 124.0' EXISTING STREAM PROFILE ROAD PROPOSED � � 1@ 14'X5' i CON-SPAN '�.� 70 DEG SKEW �` PROP STREAM GRADIENT EXSIT STREAM GRADIENT � e°� 908J i o`` -908.2 -908.0 �,�oe " O.r1/82=0.61% 0.2/40.0=0.50% i oa1 � ------�-__ a o�y � c � ---------- � • ------------ PROPOSED CUNERT MnrCH PT B GRADIENT = 1.69% 2s.o� PROPOSED STREAM PROFILE PROFILE �HORI20MAL) PROFILE (VERTICAL) 65.7' 3 O' O' � 15� 6' O' � 3' 110.0' 150.0' �ULVERT CQNSTRUCTIC.�1� SEQUENCE STA. 12 + 0 0. 5 0-L- PHASE I l. Close SR 1870 (MITCH ROAD) 10 traffic as shown in the iraffic manogemeni plans. 2. Ins}all perimeter erosion control devices as shown on EC-4. Place spec�pl stilling basins as directed by the Engineer. 3. Remove existing bridga #460465 over TribuTary to Hunting Creek. 4. Construct impervious dikes to prevent s}ream from in}ruding into work area. 5. Consiruct ofF lina the proposed pipe arch wlvert foundations and install culved. 6. Construct new stream6ed alignment. 7. Remove impervious dikes and move flow info new creek channel. i PROP. FDPS J O PAULETTA REID PARKEA J�GR C�7 40 LF OF M�T ES`Hf.A�DEL IMPZRO�VECYENT E5T.60 SY GSEOTEXTILERIP RAP �Q.O �. , / p� \ i +w.o� ` w.oa• �i (. SEE �EfAIL A -L-Pr r2+oe.is O-G- CURVE DArA PfSta IItRA7 p = b4'39'055'fK(! JAMES M REIU D= 3�SB'IA5' [ = 20875' T = 117D7' R = f85A0' SE = 0.04 DS = 25 AIPH SEE DETAIL B o�� S2 �� /� �p'� c ___ PHASE II 8. Gonsfruct laferal basa ditch from -L- Sta. 11+97 to Sto. 72+66 and tie into new stream alignment. 9. Construct impervious dikes To prevent stream from intruding infa existing channel. 70. Fili in existing channel. 11. Remove impervious dikes and completa any necessary InIeHUuflei channel improvements. 12. Remove special stilling 6asins. 13. Complete roadway cons}roction. � „3 PROP. + PROP.SOIL o°�'ss/ DRI �E ' t= °w a3 F1JP5 �^— ' N 3EOb'295Eb �zoW � -- c�_ -------t--'---�_ I � ' � Sd :�..:—n.�,.,•.-.W .--. �... "s � � � END DPS � _i�� O ,,� awocE .� . 0 RT ,-- e% •a55 : .- �' a /�� t��- r '��PROP.SOIL R 50'7APE � ^ � �� ORIVE °� °2 G r r9xoo � sa aa w EXISTING TOP OF &4NK \ a � °j'�� '� C�\ -� ' 6D0 ' \ , ,\ Fr - - �..., �e. o� : PpF ._� \ . . � — �_._ p 60.OQ vzoo OF WLE7 \' �EL IMP30OOVECYENT �\TO� ��.. tie.se ave i SY�NGWTIXSTILERIP ItAP ` \�-iy� ' -L' PC �°i�Fr��``t� � O PAfILETTA REID PARKER �� > C 40 LF Of INLET CHANNELIMPROVEMENT EST. DDE 200 CY EST. 25 TONS CIASS II RIP R4P E5T.60 SY GEOTEXTILE � SEEDETAILA-1 -L-PT IZ+0875 O-L- CURVE DATA P/5io IIt17A1 0= 69'35055'fRTJ JAMES M REI� p= 3?58'r45' L = 20875' T = !(/A7' SEtl I0� OS = 25 IAPN pp'l Sry //[�� 7 � aPo SEE �EfAli B / � �� BB.90 � Poe , zaz• , �y , . T-1'"—' <- �.�— � �' — wa� .__ ._ _' ,.-Flvl-- + PR � .SDIL o N zo'ssr DR E --.--...---.; N 3606' \ a�`\ '_�` "�v EXISTING TOP OF BANK \�.\E q �~�... c \ � �� oo � R�k ... ra. �F " \.., 0. �., ., � , ao � �2 �� IMPROVEMENT �\ s4 \ n;�" y �NS3C�A55 II RIP ItAP G� �' - f GEQTEXTILE � \�� BE57 MANAGEMENT PRACTICES FOR