20210415 Ver 1_More Info Received_20211027

October 11, 2021
To: Stephanie Goss
NC Division of Water Resources
Fr: Wyatt Brown
Brown's Environmental Group, Inc.
Re: Daniel Farm Subdivison
Benson, NC Johnston County
Revision to Original PCN submitted June 2021
SAW# 2020-00395 DWR# 20200285 v.1
Stephanie,
Attached is Information for the revised Daniel Fam subdivision.
Information originally submitted with no revisions has been omitted (USFWS, NC SHPO, etc).
The PCN Info sheet contains the updated info, with revised sections highlighted as Revised from Original
PCN.
Revisions include the total parcels, site plans/impact maps, subdivision plans, JD Request (included is the
Approved JD Request Form), and one additional wetland impact.
Briefly:
Initial delineation conducted 2015, verbal concurrence provided by USACE (David Shaeffer).
Two ponds determined to be upland (excluded) by USACE (Samantha Daley).
Construction begun 2017, without authorization. After the fact impacts are included.
PCN submitted June 2021 requesting authorization for ATF impacts. Future impacts were planned at the
time, but USACE requested permitting of ATF prior to moving forward with additional phases.
Additional Parcel (Parcel #3 Buffkin Tract) added July 2021, post submittal.
USACE Request for entire subdivision to be included in PCN Request.
This Addlnfo submittal is complete for the entire Daniel Farm Subdivison.

Daniel Farm
PCN Permitting Information
Revised Oct 2021

Daniel Farm Subdivision
PCN Info Sheet
Section A. Process Information
Processing Info
Prior AID: SAW-2015-01037 DWQ# 20210415
Section B. Applicant/Owner Information
Primary Contact Information (no change)
Wyatt Brown Brown's Environmental Group, Inc. 242 Batten Farm Rd Selma 27576
Owner Information (no change)
Daniel -Lan Development, LLC 1075 Country Club Rd Smithfield 27577
Applicant Information (no change)
Same as Owner
Agent/Consultant Information (no change)
Wyatt Brown Brown's Environmental Group, Inc. 242 Batten Farm Rd Selma 27576
• Attachment: Agent Authorization
Section C. Project Information and Prior Project History
Instructions
1, Project Name (no change)
Daniel Farm Subdivision Benson
2. Property Identification (New Lots added from Original PCN)
Parcel1: 162400-84-4154 Bk 05073
Pg
0079
Parcel2: 162400-74-5161 Bk 05073
Pg
0079
Parcel3: 162400-64-8374 Bk 05468
Pg
0950
Parcel4: 162400-71-1041 Bk 05073
Pg
0079
Parcel5: 162400-81-3495 Bk 05069
Pg
0379
Parcel6: 162400-82-5470 Bk 05267
Pg
0792
1
13.27 Ac
14.46 Ac
30.31 Ac
68.89 Ac
15.31 Ac
4.88 Ac
147.12 Ac

Daniel Farm Subdivision
PCN Info Sheet
12700 A NC Hwy 210 Benson 27504
Lat: 35.51930 N Long:-78.56867 W
• Attachment: Property ID Exhibit,
• Attachments: 1) Location 2) 2016Aerial
3. Surface Waters (no change)
Beaverdam Branch
Pole Branch (South Tracts — Open Space)
2018 Aerial 3) USGS
Class C; NSW 0302020109 03
Class C; NSW 03020201 09 03
Neuse Basin
4. Project Description and History (revised from Original PCN)
4) NRCS Soils
The Daniel Farm subdivision is multi -phase single family residential subdivision, located on NC Hwy 210
in Johnston County, NC. The subdivision consists of 6 separate parcels. The northern three parcels,
which are situated north of Hwy 210, will be developed as housing. The southern three parcels, situated
south of Hwy 210, will be undeveloped and designated as Open Space.
Two of the northern parcels have been cleared and are currently under construction as the Daniel Farm
Subdivision.
Prior to clearing and grading, the property was agricultural use. Adjacent properties are comprised
primarily of single-family residential subdivisions and/or agricultural use.
Total Wetland Acres: 13.558 Total Stream LF: 4,827
Project Purpose:
To construct a single-family residential subdivision with required infrastructure, utilities, and amenities,
to meet high demand in the western Johnston County area.
Project Detail
This submittal is requesting after -the -fact authorization for impacts associated with construction of the
initial phases of the Daniel Farm project. Also included are proposed impacts for additional phases on
Parcel 3, adjacent to the west.
After the fact impacts include two permanent wetland impacts for lot fill, and 4 temporary stream
and/or wetland sewer crossings.
Three of Daniel Farm parcels — 2 north and 1 south - were originally delineated in 2015. Potentially
jurisdictional features included 2 wetlands, 2 streams, and 2 farm ponds on the two northern parcels
where development has already occurred. The JD Info for these three parcels is included with this
submittal.
2

Daniel Farm Subdivision
PCN Info Sheet
Subdivision plans including lot layouts, utilities, stormwater, and erosion & sediment control were
prepared and approved by Johnston County Public Utilities in 2017. Roadway and utility construction
began in 2018 and have been completed. Lots were recorded beginning in 2019. Early phases of the
subdivision have been completed, houses have been constructed and are presently occupied.
During construction of Daniel Farm, the following impacts inadvertently occurred:
• Permanent wetland impacts occurred during construction of Street B (as shown on attached
E&SC plans), which extends along the western boundary throughout the subdivision.
Construction of this roadway will permanently impact and remove 0.10 acres of wetlands,
situated near the headwaters of an intermittent stream (Wetland I and Stream 2 on the JD
delineation map). This impact will allow the roadway to continue into developable uplands and
provide access to at least 16 additional lots.
• Temporary stream and wetland impacts occurred Stream 2 and Wetland I during the
construction of a sewer collection line. This construction also required permanent conversion of
forested wetland to herbaceous wetland within a permanently maintained utility corridor
(Stream 2). The temporary impacts have been completed and restored.
Two farm ponds on the site were determined to be isolated and have been converted to stormwater
management ponds. Verification of the isolated determination is included in the JD Packet.
Parcel 3 (the Buffkin Tract) was delineated in 2020 and included as part of the subdivision. Potentially
jurisdictional features include 5 Wetlands and 2 streams. This parcel is currently undeveloped. The JD
Info for Parcel 3 is included with this submittal.
• Attachments: Site Plans
5. Jurisdictional Determinations
• Attachments: 1) Approved JD Packet 2) Preliminary JD Packet
6. Future Project Plans (revised from Original PCN)
The Daniel Farm Subdivision will be constructed on the three northern parcels in different phases (some
of which have been completed); however, the project is considered whole for permitting purposes. The
three southern parcels will remain undeveloped and be designated as Open Space.
3

Daniel Farm Subdivision
PCN Info Sheet
Section D. Proposed Impacts Inventory Instructions
Impacts Summary
Wetland Impacts (revised from Original PCN)
Site #
Reason
Impact
Type of
Wetland
Forested
Type of
Impact
Type
Wetland
ID
Jurisdiction
Acres
1*
Road Fill
P
Headwater
Wetland I
Yes
Both
0.099
Forest
2*
Sewer
T
Headwater
Wetland I
Yes
Both
0.053
Corridor
Forest
3*
Sewer
T
Headwater
Wetland I
Yes
Both
0.064
Corridor
Forest
4*
Sewer
T
Headwater
Wetland I
Yes
Both
0.001
Corridor
Forest
5*
Sewer
T
Headwater
Wetland I
Yes
Both
0.039
Corridor
Forest
6
Lot Fill
P
Headwater
Wetland C
Yes
Both
0.042
Forest
*= After the Fact Permitting Request
Stream Impacts (no change)
Site #
Reason
Impact
Type of
Stream
Stream
Type of
Stream
Impact
for
Type
Impact
Name
Type
Jurisdiction
Width
Length
Impact
1
Sewer
Temporary
Other
Stream
Intermittent
Both
2 ft
25
2
2
Sewer
Temporary
Other
Stream
Intermittent
Both
2 ft
25 ft
3
Buffer Impacts (Authorized through Johnston County).
All sewer crossing impacts are considered 'Allowable')
4

Daniel Farm Subdivision
PCN Info Sheet
Section E. Impact Justification and Mitigation Instructions
Avoidance and Minimization (revised from Original PCN)
Prior to site design, streams, wetlands, and riparian buffers were delineated to identify potential
resource areas to avoid where practical. Impacts have been avoided where possible, while allowing
access to developable uplands.
Permanent Wetland Impact #1 is required for the construction of a roadway which provides access to 16
developable upland lots.
The sewer corridor is located to provide access for the subdivision while avoiding the main bottomland
hardwood forest along Stream 1.
Permanent Wetland Impact #6 is required for the construction of a residential lot. This fill is required to
clip a small portion of the wetland and provide stable for upland construction.
Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts (revised from Original PCN)
The applicant is proposing to pay mitigation at 2:1 ratio for two permanent wetland impacts, 1:1 ratio
for sewer corridor conversion impacts
Payment will be through Private Mitigation bank.
• Attachments: SOA Letter
No other revisions have been made to Original PCN
5

Parcel Information
Revised Oct 2021

* * * DISCLAIMER * * *
Johnston County assumes no legal responsibility for the information represented here.
N T
♦ L ON ' GREE
D
Jr
♦ ♦ ♦
♦
Result 0
B K R N PH 4
♦♦
id:
13EO4003A
♦
♦
♦
Tag:
13EO4003A
Y
♦
Owner Name 1:
DANIEL-LAN DEVELOPMENT,
CROSSROADS N H PH ♦
♦
LLC
♦ HARRIS POINTE PH 1
Owner Name 2:
♦ ♦
♦
Mail Address 1:
1075 COUNTRY CLUB RD
FAIRINGTON ♦
Mail Address 2:
W IN
Mail Address 3:
SMITHFIELD, NC 27577-8310
Book:
05073
Page:
0079
♦ H3
WELLINGTON SUBDIVISION .
IA
Result 0
♦
♦ MtRRISON 4ANOR
♦
Aid:
13EO4003B
GREENLEAF WO
Tag:
13EO4003B
REENLEAF WOOA S/D P II LEWOOD
♦ ♦
Owner Name 1:
DANIEL-LAN DEVELOPMENT,
♦
LLC
♦ SANDY WIND S
Owner Name 2:
ALM HARBOR S/D ♦ ♦
Mail Address 1:
1075 COUNTRY CLUB RD
RBAItTERRACE
Mail Address 2:
♦
MA SON LA ING P
Mail Address 3:
SMITHFIELD, NC 27577-8310
Book:
05073
Page:
0079
PIN S
J ACR SEC.2
SPRIN
RAN H
REST, PHA
ONE
N
Scale:
1:40240 - 1 in. = 3353.32 feet
Johnston County GIS
(The scale is only accurate when printed landscape on a 8 1/2 x 11 size sheet with no page scaling.)
September 27, 2021

* * * DISCLAIMER * * *
Johnston County assumes no legal responsibility for the information represented here.
Result 0
id:
13EO5003K
Tag:
13EO5003K
Owner Name 1:
DANIEL-LAN DEVELOPMENT,
LLC
Owner Name 2:
Mail Address 1:
1075 COUNTRY CLUB RD
Mail Address 2:
Mail Address 3:
SMITHFIELD, NC 27577-8310
Book:
05468
Page:
0950
Result 0
Result 0
id:
13EO4003I
Tag:
13EO4003I
Owner Name 1:
DANIEL-LAN DEVELOPMENT,
LLC
Owner Name 2:
Mail Address 1:
1075 COUNTRY CLUB RD
Mail Address 2:
Mail Address 3:
SMITHFIELD, NC 27577-8310
Book:
05267
Page:
0792
Result 0
id:
13EO5007D
id:
13EO5003C
Tag:
13EO5007D
Tag:
13EO5003C
Owner Name 1:
DANIEL-LAN DEVELOPMENT,
Owner Name 1:
DANIEL-LAN DEVELOPMENT,
LLC
LLC
Owner Name 2:
Owner Name 2:
Mail Address 1:
1075 COUNTRY CLUB RD
Mail Address 1:
1075 COUNTRY CLUB RD
Mail Address 2:
Mail Address 2:
Mail Address 3:
SMITHFIELD, NC 27577-8310
Mail Address 3:
SMITHFIELD, NC 27577-8310
Book:
05069
Book:
05073
Page:
0379
Page:
0079

March 20, 2019
US Army Corps of Engineers
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587
Mr. Ross Sullivan
Re: Daniels Farm , Johnston County
I, the undersigned, a duly authorized owner of record of the property/properties identified herein, do
authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) to enter upon
the property herein described for the purpose of conducting on -site investigations and issuing a
determination associated with Waters of the U.S. subject to Federal jurisdiction under Section 404 of
the Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899. The property's PIN
numbers are: 162400-74-5061, 162400-83-2985, 162400-83-4257, 162400-93-0696, 162400-71-1041
and 163400-73-6001..
Also, Mr. Wyatt Brown of Brown's Environmental Group, Inc. has my permission to act as my agent on
this property concerning wetlands and streams.
Lanny Clifton
Daniel -Lan Development, LLC

Site Maps
Revised Oct 2021
1.Location Map
2. Aerial Photo
3. USGS Topographic Map
4. NRCS Soil Survey Map
5.Site Plans/Impact Map

Legend CO Daniel Farm Subdivision
•. Jlf•:. ..c. .. ,. �[: •r I ..:\.' ��:.,i: P•�i �. �� -.. -... wry'"\�-� may.
,: pry •.
n[[ _ f�
Jim
/�.• (''
CT
�--- lJ11
-ti fir`~�.
V - -� r� -I
c , -
� � - -
_
�~
- l Mc(:cr Cr adS.. � I I
L ossri)ad f
- '. ` - ,' -'' , -� .fir]•.. '.
��.--" 1 C41 Ml'YS
G
1-1 I 7L�,11
r 'y j� I ��,�� � �Z...• / -titer -�`- i �,. .�
\AA
Yl
y� {1 _ /i- l `• � �� III ��"
Wei
Hard—
\-, \� \ \ iL��l. �7 .Y: +.�� 111 . •� �\ z�,� 1•� - -. _ ��
®Figure
By: MRR
1
Location Map
Daniel Farm Subdivision
NC Hwy 210, Benson NC
Pleasant Grove Township, Johnston County
Scale
NTS
6/25/21

oo
f
Parcel 3 1w, I
'DANIEL-LAN DEVELOPMENT, LLC Parcel 2 T
00-64-8374 DANIEL-LAN DEVELOPMENT, LLC
M.31 ws
PIN# 162400-74-5161
14.46 Acres
Parcel 1
DANIEL-LAN DEVELOPMENT, LLC
PIN# 162400-84-4154
13.27 Acres
`4
A
- qL . . - - . I
'A'
Parcel 6
DANIEL-LAN DEVELOPMENT, LLC
PIN# 162400-82-5470
4.88 Acres
Z
Parcel 5
DANIEL-LAN DEVELOPMENT, LLC
Parcel 4 PIN# 162400-81-3495
15.31 Acres
Ir DANIEL-LAN DEVELOPMENT, LLC
• PIN# 162400-71-1041
69.49 Acre
14 - ------
I *kl loll
or
I '
'.7m I
�11

Legend
0 Daniel Farm u.„o�
McGee Cr s hd�s
t
e Br
50 �
�Nf.OR�
®
o���sroo��ow°9�.MaP
By: MRR
Figure
3
USGS Topographic Map
Edmondson Quadrangle
Source: USGS Mapping Services
oa��e�Fa,m.wo�;:��o�
Daniel Farm Subdivision
NC Hwy zio, Benson NC
Pleasant Grove Township, Johnston County
Scale
NTS
o❑�
allow"�-
9/28/21
�

Legend
r _ Daniel Farm Subdivision
lRbGe
'
Wr
Y—
to N.
ds.
Y + N kB
r
__WAB
GOD
N kO
08
U
Gen
U -
®Figure
4
NRCS Soil Survey Map
Soil Survey of Johnston County, 1994
Map Sheet 5
Daniel Farm Subdivision
NC Hwy 210, Benson NC
Pleasant Grove Township, Johnston County
Scale
NTSR`ul�
g�28/21
- • •••••
By: MRR

WETLAND IMPACTS
M PACT AREA #
AREA
1
0.0994 AC.
2
0.0528 AC.
3
0.0644 AC.
4
0.0002 AC.
5
0.0389 AC.
6
0.0419 AC.
TOTAL
0.2976 AC.
TEMPORARY STREAM IMPACTS
IMPACT AREA #
LENGTH
1
31 L.F.
2
26 L.F.
TOTAL
57 L.F.
W W
W W �
W W W
W W W
`Y W
W W W
wwv
IV
//././ 111
his
32 IV y y
31
"'��' "/'�♦` "\ \\ `\ \`"'''%'T4' W ' /; WETLAND IMPACT AREA #2 (SEWER
//'%%/\\\��';\��\`\%„�!'s�f.::::: W __;;, ♦`, 30 \' LINE CONSTRUCTION) — 0.0528 AC.
,,���///�/////f ////�//�/i^ ♦�\\♦`�♦\\ \IIIIII %l//%I/%l�r :.:.:::::�:_:::: •-:•.-• � � � ��- j ♦ ♦ lI � \ I'----- y \ �Y y
/\\\\\\, I\lill)Ijlly. ...:x.y.:i�: .::iv:: :. \ ��/ ♦♦ \♦/, I �Y \ y �Y
0%/9af'' /,,rV \::: �\\,\l,l;,l;ll�;//r,/ � ..'T 'af.. ,;.':.:•YCC:CIII�'C:•' W \\ _ ----- -;- //;;,/ 29
♦ �� \ ,�' �` �\ \ TEMPORARY STREAM IMPACT 1
f/' \\..�\ 111'1'/; //%�,' :�.�:::::• '..�: ;:'::::: \ ' (STREAM 2) — 31 L.F.
-----II{pV/q/I';; uo411gr'Iq ��� Y\�/�"//�/,'�/////,/ ri•:;;•i:•i:•: iii::(::j? j::;,' \ i ''�", / /p 34
WETLAND IMPACT AREA 6 �mlllll IIII (♦f 'may, ?crr.::::•• . `---------
_ ^yrIIp/YIII�j I�Illlllllll��y •.c \ �/ /l% /;fir \ '�♦ 0�
# � % � r:i':i:i::::iir'. a..:::a �� \ 28 ♦ / �Y �Y y �
_ - - -�i� \\ `\�� \ �� �.� /......:::::::... .^�iv �:it(•i.••.•."¢.:•: _ - ' f // •ram ♦
(LOT GRADING) — 0.0419 AC. r ---- "\:;`.� �::::::::::: _---------_-______- 35 i� \
27
r::::..:•::::::
36
..
h.../ \ --J I 26 37:49
i7.:.:.:....:.'::.`:..:...:.:.:..t,.....W.F......:.:.:...•:...:;...: ...:..:....:.'..v....:..•..:.
.:.'.:..:..:..:....�...'..:...:. ..:..:..:..:..:.. �.�:.':........,...•....:. .:.:.:.':.�..:..':..:..::.::.:.::.::..:..:..
:.•;.::..:.:.'.:..:.....,.�...-:.:.: ii:':.•ia?:"�:1::.�'c::.. \...... .:.:.:`.:.:.:.:.:.:.\.:..:..:.e...:...:..v..:::..:..:... . .':..:..:..:..:.:..:...:..:..:. .•:..:.......W.y W /WW'260
�
\♦. ...T8_x
/\ \kv107
/ -___-
\\
\\\
�
WETLAND IMPACT AREA #3 SEWER
...........................
J�/.r.:::14/ir':i'::'tTJ;:r•i•"rif1.i:••�.:i :/:Z:::..:..:.i.: i.��•:• .i..:i/::.i.::f +is.2 •a, rte.Wi.:.T::♦'•::nt:.:^•:.:1cr:::.::i•i:::::::r:•=::::::.i.il_•:yt.�:.t..:\...;ia. ;r;::-\ii•i-!:.r::: -:iv/:s •:::a.�.ti.�✓.,.x. c= .�:::3:.1.L{:t:':.:::::/-_:::..r:;::.:\:\ :::.C�' -♦ i` \♦ ,- \ \ =\1� \�y 0\\ \ .\-i \ \`T\ NX I' �\�/° W/ /,dW,,.- I-/- //,/ / ;, / // ./ / / /, , '// .,/ ,�,//,' i, j ' 2-/ l��o'' ,_-2'/4- 7fi ' ---- _ - —�' — -_ 1�_-���'. ,�-�'-� //,-/ ,,_J /.III,IIIIIIII,II;II1„II1I,11I11,III-11I1II,1 L;1-I ------ ---II -/�i', ,II1II UIIII1III1IIII/
1,I'I II//,IIIl'IIlI/(hII1 I,/ i /r y yy yy yy "/ ', ' , f \\ \, \\♦\ y```♦, ♦__g/ g /-\\' dr I/I / ,/ \` o\\\ o\
y -\W
yy
y
0.0644 AC.LINE CONSTRUCTION)l06 108........-------E:::iiiiii•
,.....i.. 39 TEMPORARY STREAM IMPACT 2 ;__246-- 1 24 (STREAM 3) 26 L.F. ...
109
....... '.41
?.„ 60 /2 5--J41 105
...
.......... • \ \- _ / / \ `. `� 1 \� _ , , / i / / / �,1 - J - _ �- - ' - Ih III'1 II I I I I I 40 / /%/IIIII ` `\ , • , \ \\ /
f• �... � \ -s}�.� - '/ , \ \ \ \ '�, � ' ' / I I I ' - - - - -_� l� ,II IIIIII 23
IL
I � •'-______ ��''/i%�/ �\ \\ \ \�� �Y o
^�:�• - - - \ \ \ S \ � � � it ''I - \\ 1 III I L-----_I1 � _ _ - i'iU� \ � \ ✓''/ /// p\ \
\\� }\S 23 ' I`i �i 7� ✓ �' / ��4fk/ 253 111 1 _// y-------� `\`i\
r _ / ---------------------
r .... --'� '� \ I ` I /1 (. o I /:*Y Y 241/' " — (n, i it i--------IIII h - - -- --- 1 �__ ///
\I �•:: i:•ir" \ / I �� / ,''l \ `\ \ \ \� 1 �� `\ `--J I ' �/` -/�" / / / / / II, I I 1 �1 I1 / // / / /_/, �/ �/ -/_ I I I l 1 \ /7\ 1 \ r.\ �\\ \ \ \\ \ \\ \ �\ \\ 1\ 1 \ ----\ .--✓ =' �T- -___/ � -�/�// , f�/'' ./ �, >�, k-�l/�'I //'�//'/.�.. /' // / -/G /,—/ /2i4/— 2/ �/� �� �,/' Ii, i/ /�` 254
/ /%4j1 I / I \ I ' II+ IIII IIIIIIII�II'IIIIIIII III 22
1\I\\II�\\1III1I�IIIIq1I1I I
I � \ 1 \,•-_- 1 1 1 _'III
\ \ \ y \ \ \.� `L• yy .�yy yy.I� `y� f'—�y� _ �IV
.y
'' - II I j11\ �--- 1l `
442 1 67 OND 2 ,4
245 NOT 21 DICTI%231 68 II 10
J b' Z yy y y.I• y •I• .� .,b,, .-� -. I, y ,b ,V ,I, ,I, y ,/Y,,
112
/
/
I II III I III II y y y y y II �y y y�y \ y y y y
1 23
h 23$�26 iy, k 222 8 227 I 2�5 224I j�L�1 I2265
I -\ ♦ \ \ \_ _ - //'/ L%/ ; -_ �/Jy / II % \ \/ , _\ \ I / �� J\_� I � �-JT 1LI r- �I -I --'1I -J-/I I II --�L1J II hI'-1 � / ./ / f� r -�I//1 '_- //-/-�-�_�',./r' '�','/��I b'/ � f/-' /�-� J' I 1�'�---� ��+ ---_-- 2_--_-1-$-- '--�/ + 1 '/ / rIi'XI' / //- 21l-\7 `\ ` / iI / i'I I II1�IIL ,II -T�,\ �/'- /IL\ 1 I II1 1� -IIIIIIIuIIIII •= --- =--r---117II •,I I1 � I.IN . - --'-�II 1 rIIII ---- - �--\� .l I 1i � /•(�� '� 1IIIIII1I I1 I IIII I II � _1,"1 1 11 1. 1I '..��,I
12 4
y `Y
w
WETLAND IMPACT AREA 4 (SEWER
)�
90 20 66 71 102 113 LINE CONSTRUCTION) 0.0002 AC .
\ , I I I •f ' ' "/ __ / / / - - II y��J\\=`\�\ (�,�\\\`\o\ �`-��: /\-;�''�' --'-� /— �-' ' �/' /'/ / ,, / / /// % I / /// / i/ I % / /I / , %rI\' I iII I I III // // / 'j //l / / / / ; ,�/ /// / / ; ,/\ / /\l/��1\\ \ \i \\/r\ I- \ ``-. �-♦- ' �;`/�\ \ \/1 I ' /, 1 / , i// // ; // / //''// _ \\ \\ \ _ \ \- N _, I \IIIIIir -- - -// ---_- ^ -- �J- ,,IIII I \ I \ //I1L� I-\---1-9 I II �I1 l .iIIii \ II•.'II,i I+I _--_--_--_--_--_4-_4 7-2---- ,IIIII�IIoIlIII I uIIIIIlIIIIIIIII, lIIIIIIIII� III`lI �IIII _---I�I \1\\\ \,2
51 p�,1 65 101 1 114
� I I ,'14I 12121/6 1R2 18 45 64 73 100 126
1 5 127--J L---------- -----------I II L----------
____— 12o- - --- jv --------_WETLAND IMPACT AREA #1 (ROADWAY 214 r------ �____---_CONSTRUCTION) 0.0994 AC. 6 128//— ,—L —/ 46 63 99 ./
r
'(94
lyj' � 116 ;rf ri I
16 I I I I� I I 62 \y 75 yll IIIIIII I \y 'I ------ I'rl n1
y' 47 •i III II 98 ; I 1 1 9 1 /. y
A29 ,r
h I' `��� ' \ ♦/ , / / i / , / / , / / / / / / / / , , / / / / / \ \1 /I II I I I / l/ / / / /YII - /T 2'1/2' '- /' I, ' -�\\/
J//It
9748 61 �' 76
196 1 ' I11III
,I
WETLAND IMPACT AREA #5 (SEWER
It \`_"------------ 2 ----------„ 3-------------------- 15 117
_----------\ . , -- _ ' LINE CONSTRUCTION) — 0.0389 AC.
- I,-----------1 r----------
/ � I ��-\
/21 V / I ' , II I 77 IIIIII
1�9-7___/ �i 14 I, ' `n 49 I I 60 �� iili ii li , 96
I\
POND 1 /
\ I � I 111 III I I � /' \ ` ♦ /,' /
T I I � IIIII I
1,1 I I I III II I I ' _ \
209 \ \��\ 198 "' 13 IY 50 I I 59 , I •I 78 IIII,II IIII I T /. 1 \ \ , � V I I IIIII \ /,/, NOT JURISDICTIONAL � I
' I III� iI I I I y I 95
- \ \�-J 1 1'i I I ' 111 h 11 IIII I i ��__� _ 132
-_�\ ♦\ \ \ �\` / , " / / / // /, / , , I / I I 1 1 rl� - - �\ i - �� `I r=------ 11 ✓ I I i I II IIII 1 IIIII / � I I
♦ \ \ �� / / / / / / / I \ 1 I I I , \ � �I \ � n , � I II j11 I I I/' IIII / , I I
r,. \ \\ \ \ \ \ \\ \ \\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \\ . `\.\___--�' �-� -- '- //- �'/-�'-'�',///�/ -_�,��,/, /// / //./ / , /__,/ /�' /' / , /� / // //' , / , /,,// / ,/ / / // , � ,/'/ , � // ,/ // / II I Il NI'nI \ ,\ I \ \I II,\ 1 \ \ \ II II \\ \ \ ,1 I 1 \\ \I I \1 \ \. \ \\ nh` T-1II _ � \ \�\20♦-- `,-l-S - -J�- - -' II, �-_ �\��'� -�\- �,2 9�9S- -\�/� J iI Fl�\/ II�{9I --_----11 --21 -- 5521 -JIIII 1II IIIII 58 iJ 1i I•ir-----7-9- ----- IIIIIiIIY�IIIViiIIIIIlII„IIlIi IIIIIIIIIIIIIII III 1Ii IiLI 94 I1 1--3---I3
L---------------------I 00 J 134
----------
------ III ----------J
207----- 200, 1+r13557 80 93
) ,/-I ��`)_1) \ �\ j \ ♦'/' i/,/. //i/ce 1� /5/'/ 7/// .���-�_/
\ \
4 IIII
III
111 I, i I =,___ \� �♦ \ / \� I I .
\ . `�__ - - /_/'/,' / -/- ---''// / / ,% // //''�''� �/, /// /'/''/���/'�/._' -----/ __ \`` � \ \ �\.`\ \\ ` \\\\ ♦` \♦ `�\ \\ \\♦ \\ \\\� . \. �``\� �� , ThIII om�, ----2 --_ /�/1 _- --_--_--_' I-- �--- � �\__L-- -�8--J I 1 1 1 1 'i I i llI1IIIII '----T,I1I1h
-`_♦- \�`]/� �/ -,/- . --�/ / /��' 15-810 53 56 81 92 1136 II 1 4 II I I I146
--------- 80- piL
__ --- 11, If I y-----0- 4 /
82 91 \\�\\-\\\\\`/\,♦
\// `\♦\ `\
`♦
\
167
IF j IIII I I � 137
/ �/ - - - - \ \ `♦ �♦ \ ,1_ / --_ \ 1 /// I
J /�� ,/ / / - � ` ♦\ ♦ ♦ �� \ I --- - /L----------JJ -----------J I IIIII L--------- ♦04--- - 1--------- ' I1 ---------P+/ / II y \ / I !' \\\ `• , I 9. _
/------\\ \ \ �\ \`\ �`� !• '285 - - _203 \ I -� ��I, rr- _�7 r ____---_-__ II -------_ , _ I 4 j" vi"C'I/11
_ N I I L__ h�---------�---^ F� I \ I \\\ I II \ \�
I Ihhl "` ---I Iji, r---------7 V /- / i,1 159 I lilu 166
\ I I --------- 1 1 1 i I II� I III IIII I I - I
I -_/ / / '' /. ,/ ,' "/'' - \\I U' L - - - - - _ - - _ II IIjI1I II 1 11911\\,,1\11,\\ II /(, - Ii I III ; ,• ; li�l 15583
168
$ 138 144
1
I Ir Ihl I I 148 411 , II --------- N
' .,� ---- - ' IIII I I \ - — — - ` I 1 /r /) 1
\\l I r1 I IIII I `r -,{n� L__-- - --------------- i n, \\\\� I 1y11 r-------- - /
a 160 II „
i 89 I' — — _ — = - ---"'
4 --- --- \� II �I-------- I I 154 'i----------- )ii 165 i
I 84 I III I _- --- -� 1 iii _ J I I
l \\ \\ I 139 I 111 '------___ -- III / 169
\ I / \ 1 1\, I I-----------J IIII L----------� I \ I I \\
\ 1\1\\ � ' �I � III \ - �=-----------
'----------\ I ---
" \ I I \ I 1 r---------Z� II 143 �I
\111 � I I \ I I � I
149
�III85 I I I ` ------ I I I I Ir-------- \ I ------- -- -----
h , 1 , IIII / \\ 161_--
` I 1j1 , 88 I ' I I r r IIII) 1 \\ - \,
140 :'----''' --- __-•`-�-_-- II IIIiII \\• \\ 6 \ \\\\\\�\\�,.. \` .an ��\ �``F�1_+I � ' ' \ I'' � , II IIII1II1II II Ii I IIIIII III I 1_53
I
\
'
} 170
I150 164
f86 I 162
87 142
I \ , \\\\\• \ r=-=�- I i\I 141 ' / / /'' - / /----- III IIII I , \/\/ ,\ �\...\ � , ,/\_• - � ./� I • /\\ / _T�� ----- � I/ .\ __.�I�- II tII =� III II III IIIII, II1IIIIIIII II 152 --151 \\ \
/
/
171
5 its.
SOME WATER, SANITARY SEWER, ELECTRIC, TELEPHONE AND CABLE
SERVICES COULD EXIST ALONG THE CONSTRUCTION ROUTE THAT
MAY NOT BE SHOWN ON THE PLANS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE
RESPONSIBLE FOR NOTIFYING THE PROPER UTILITY IN ADVANCE TO
LOCATE THESE SERVICES.
4
-----------_-- --
---
' . IIlI 1
,' II•I' I I I I i I 1 Ii I I
_
1 Ir-----I
Ii
'
\ 1 ' • I
-•
--
- —,1-
-7-
2 3 2 189 �------'1188 �1 187
t 118------ 173
1 1 5
----- ------ - - --- — 184 18 18 181
- 180111
- 179 174
- 7------ - 177 I
176
NC
, HWy210 i I\60'PUBL� /V------
------ ----- ----
__ - - -
-
„
_-------------
---------7
-----------------_� -- ---
SCALE: 1 " = 120'
60 1 0 240
WETLAND IMPACT MAP
FOR THE
DANIEL FARM SUBDIVISION
PLEASANT GROVE TOWNSHIP - JOHNSTON COUNTY, N.C.

JD Request Packet

JD Packet
1. Approved JD Summary
2. Preliminary JD Request

Approved JD
• Delineation Map with Isolated Ponds
Highlighted
• JD Request Summary with Timeline
• eMail fm USACE to Brown's Environmental
Group, Inc.

U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
REGULATORY PROGRAM
APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION FORM (INTERIM)
NAVIGABLE WATERS PROTECTION RULE
I. ADMINISTRATIVE INFORMATION
Completion Date of Approved Jurisdictional Determination (AJD): Select.
ORM Number: SAW-2015-01037
Associated JDs: SAW-2015-01037 NCDWR# 20210415
Review Area Location': State/Territory: NC City: Benson County/Parish/Borough: Johnston County
Center Coordinates of Review Area: Latitude 35.51930 Longitude-78.56867
II. FINDINGS
A. Summary: Check all that apply. At least one box from the following list MUST be selected. Complete the
corresponding sections/tables and summarize data sources.
❑ The review area is comprised entirely of dry land (i.e., there are no waters or water features, including
wetlands, of any kind in the entire review area). Rationale: N/A or describe rationale.
❑ There are "navigable waters of the United States" within Rivers and Harbors Act jurisdiction within the
review area (complete table in Section II.B).
❑ There are "waters of the United States" within Clean Water Act jurisdiction within the review area
(complete appropriate tables in Section II.C).
❑x There are waters or water features excluded from Clean Water Act jurisdiction within the review area
(complete table in Section II.D).
B. Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899 Section 10 (§ 10)2
10 Name
§ 10 Size
§ 10 Criteria
Rationale for § 10 Determination
N/A.
N/A. I N/A
N/A.
N/A.
C. Clean Water Act Section 404
Territorial Seas and Traditional Navigable Waters a 1 waters):'
a 1 Name
a 1 Size
a 1 Criteria
Rationale fora 1 Determination
N/A.
N/A. I N/A.
N/A.
N/A.
Tributaries a 2 waters):
a 2 Name
a 2 Size
a 2 Criteria
Rationale fora 2 Determination
N/A.
N/A. I N/A.
I N/A.
I N/A.
Lakes and ponds, and impoundments of jurisdictional waters ((a)(3) waters):
(a)(3) Name
(a)(3) Size
(a)(3) Criteria
Rationale fora 3 Determination
N/A.
N/A. I N/A.
N/A.
N/A.
Adjacent wetlands a 4 waters):
a 4 Name
a 4 Size
a 4 Criteria
Rationale fora 4 Determination
N/A.
N/A. I N/A.
N/A.
N/A.
Map(s)/figure(s) are attached to the AJD provided to the requestor
2 If the navigable water is not subject to the ebb and flow of the tide or included on the District's list of Rivers and Harbors Act Section 10 navigable
waters list, do NOT use this document to make the determination. The District must continue to follow the procedure outlined in 33 CFR part 329.14 to
make a Rivers and Harbors Act Section 10 navigability determination.
3 A stand-alone TNW determination is completed independently of a request for an AJD. A stand-alone TNW determination is conducted for a specific
segment of river or stream or other type of waterbody, such as a lake, where upstream or downstream limits or lake borders are established. A stand-
alone TNW determination should be completed following applicable guidance and should NOT be documented on the AJD Form.
Page 1 of 3 Form Version 29 July 2020updated

U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
REGULATORY PROGRAM
APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION FORM (INTERIM)
NAVIGABLE WATERS PROTECTION RULE
D. Excluded Waters or Features
Excluded waters b)(1) — (b)(1 2:4
Exclusion Name
Exclusion Size
Exclusion'
Rationale for Exclusion Determination
Pond 01 and
0.22
acre(s)
(b)(8) Artificial
No connecting waters; Pond is surrounded by
Pond 02
(Pond
lake/pond
Uplands
01) and
constructed or
0.95
excavated in
(Pond
upland or a non-
02)
jurisdictional
water, so long as
the artificial lake
or pond is not an
impoundment of
a jurisdictional
water that meets
(c)(6).
III. SUPPORTING INFORMATION
A. Select/enter all resources that were used to aid in this determination and attach data/maps to this
document and/or references/citations in the administrative record, as appropriate.
❑x Information submitted by, or on behalf of, the applicant/consultant: eMail with Corps, June 6, 2017
This information Select. sufficient for purposes of this AJD.
Rationale: N/A or describe rationale for insufficiency (including partial insufficiency).
❑ Data sheets prepared by the Corps: Title(s) and/or date(s).
❑ Photographs: Select. Title(s) and/or date(s).
❑x Corps site visit(s) conducted on: Date(s).
❑x Previous Jurisdictional Determinations (AJDs or PJDs): SAW-2015-01037
❑ Antecedent Precipitation Tool: provide detailed discussion in Section 111.B.
❑ USDA NRCS Soil Survey: Title(s) and/or date(s).
❑ USFWS NWI maps: Title(s) and/or date(s).
❑ USGS topographic maps: Title(s) and/or date(s).
Other data sources used to aid in this determination:
Data Source select
Name and/or date and other relevant information
USGS Sources
N/A.
USDA Sources
N/A.
NOAA Sources
N/A.
USACE Sources
eMail with Corps, June 6, 2017
State/Local/Tribal Sources
N/A.
Other Sources
N/A.
B. Typical year assessment(s): N/A
4 Some excluded waters, such as (b)(2) and (b)(4), may not be specifically identified on the AJD form unless a requestor specifically asks a Corps district
to do so. Corps districts may, in case -by -case instances, choose to identify some or all of these waters within the review area.
5 Because of the broad nature of the (b)(1) exclusion and in an effort to collect data on specific types of waters that would be covered by the (b)(1)
exclusion, four sub -categories of (b)(1) exclusions were administratively created for the purposes of the AJD Form. These four sub -categories are not
new exclusions, but are simply administrative distinctions and remain (b)(1) exclusions as defined by the NWPR.
Page 2 of 3 Form Version 29 July 2020updated

U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
REGULATORY PROGRAM
APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION FORM (INTERIM)
NAVIGABLE WATERS PROTECTION RULE
C. Additional comments to support AJD: Both Pond 01 and Pond 02 were verified as constructed in
uplands by USACE in 2015 and again in 2017. Email with confirmation are included with this request.
Page 3 of 3 Form Version 29 July 2020updated

Pond 01
0.22 Acres
Excluded
A.PPROFVED JD
REVIEW AREA
POND 01
Jkk
ro
U—
C) 0
-E
(a U
C)
hag
Pond 02
U.!O.'j Acres
Excluded
<
APPRO E.
REVIEW AREA rn ca
C:
POND 02
C:)
<

Daniel Farm Subdivision
SAW-2015-01037
JD Request Timeline and Summary
May 2021
2015
• Delineation of streams and wetlands was conducted on both Daniel Farm North and Daniel Farm
South by Wyatt Brown, Brown's Environmental Group, Inc.
• During site meeting, USACE David Shaeffer agreed with the delineation. No written
confirmation was issued.
• Subdivision planning began.
2017
• During site meeting, USACE Samantha Daley agreed the two farm ponds located on north side
were constructed in uplands and not jurisdictional. The ponds are not shown as jurisdictional on
the original 2015 delineation.
• The Non -Jurisdictional status was verified this in email 7/6/17. USACE asked for amended JD
Request to include Approved for the ponds and Preliminary for all jurisdictional features.
• In late 2017, the county approved site plans, utility, ESC, and stormwater plans and site work
began.
2019
• Planning began for Daniel Farm South. Wyatt Brown checked with USACE Samantha Daley
regarding the JD status.
• USACE noted that the original delineation info was 4 years old, land had been cleared, and asked
for revised exhibits, PJD forms, etc. for both north and south sides, revised tables and acreages,
and info on the ponds for the Approved portion.
Current status:
There is still no written Preliminary and Approved JD for the project, north or south side.

[e-mail]
From: wyatt brown <[e-mail]>
Sent: Wednesday, April 8, 2020 7:22 PM
To: Martin Richmond
Subject: Fwd: [Non-DoD Source] Re: SAW-2015-01037 Johnston County Pond
Attachments: Daniels Farm Agent letter.docx; aerial owner 1.pdf, Preliminary JD.pdf; Continued
Aquatic Resource Table from Preliminary JD Form.docx; SAW_JD_Request_12-2013
_fillable_form (1) (1).pdf; Stream, wetland map.pdf, Wet data form A.doc; Wet data form
B.doc; Wet data form C, D, Edoc; Wet data form Fdoc; Wet data form G.doc; Wet data
form J line.doc; Dry data form 1doc
Lets talk about this before you go. I can talk tonight if you can.
---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: wyatt brown <[e-mail]>
Date: Sun, Apr 21, 2019 at 4:38 PM
Subject: Re: [Non-DoD Source] Re: SAW-2015-01037 Johnston County Pond
To: Dailey, Samantha J CIV USARMY CESAW (USA) <[e-mail]>
Sam
I have attached the Preliminary JD package as we discussed, I reworked everything and it took a lot longer than I
thought. All is combined under one name and it accurately represents what was approved in the field. Please contact me
if any questions and I appreciate your time and help with this. I hope you are doing well.
Wyatt
On Wed, Mar 20, 2019 at 8:55 AM Dailey, Samantha J CIV USARMY CESAW (USA) <[e-mail]>
wrote:
Hey Wyatt,
I'm finally getting around to these and given the information was submitted almost 4 years ago, and they've already
done some major earth moving out there, I need you to provide a revised aerial map that shows all of the features, for
both sites. If the project is being done as a whole, the nomenclature is the same for both sites, so the feature
nomenclature should be revised so there are no duplicate names. Please also provide a revised table to reflect those
changes. In addition, please provide the acreage for the ponds so that I can complete the approved JD for those. If you
have any additional questions please do not hesitate to contact me.
Thank you,
Sam
Samantha Dailey
Regulatory Project Manager
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Regulatory Division
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, NC 27587
[phone], Ext. 22
[e-mail]

-----Original Message -----
From: wyatt brown [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Monday, February 18, 2019 8:15 PM
To: Dailey, Samantha J CIV USARMY CESAW (USA) <[e-mail]>
Subject: [Non-DoD Source] Re: SAW-2015-01037 Johnston County Pond
Sam
I hope you are well and are I'm sure you have been walking in water like I have with all the rain this winter. I hate to
bother you but I've noticed I havent received the preliminary JD's we discussed. We are soon beginning work on one of
the parcels. Don't hesitate to call me and we'll discuss this.
thanks
Wyatt
On Thu, Jul 6, 2017 at 1:13 PM Wyatt Brown <[e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]> > wrote:
Sam
Thank you, we will use the large pond for sediment/stormwater without an impact. For the JD's I would say soon as
possible, let me know what you need.
Wyatt
Wyatt Brown, LSS, CPESC
Pres., Brown's Environmental Group, Inc.
[phone]
> On Jul 6, 2017, at 12:54 PM, Dailey, Samantha J CIV USARMY CESAW (US) <[e-mail]
<mailto:[e-mail]> > wrote:
> Wyatt,
> Both ponds appear to have been constructed in uplands, outside of waters of the U.S. The spillway draining the
pond does have an ordinary high water mark, but resembles more of an ephemeral channel. I would like to move
forward with a preliminary JD for all areas except the ponds, which will need to be done under an approved JD. Please
let me know the timeframe for needing this documentation.
> Thank you,
> Sam
> Samantha Dailey
> Regulatory Project Manager
> U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
> Regulatory Division
> 3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
> Wake Forest, NC 27587
> [phone], Ext. Ext. 22
> [e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]>

Wyatt Brown, LSS, CPESC
Brown's Environmental Group, Inc
919-524-5956
Wyatt Brown, LSS, CPESC
Brown's Environmental Group, Inc
919-524-5956
Wyatt Brown, LSS, CPESC
Brown's Environmental Group, Inc
919-524-5956

Preliminary JD

Preliminary ORM Data Entry Fields for New Actions
ACTION ID #: SAW- 2015-01037
Prepare file folder ❑
1. Project Name [PCN Form A2a]: Daniel Farm
Begin Date (Date Received):
Assign Action ID Number in ORM ❑
2. Work Type: ✓❑Private ❑ Institutional ❑ Government ❑ Commercial
3. Project Description / Purpose [PCN Form B3d and B3e]:
Daniel Farm is a multi -phased single-family residential subdivision located on Hwy 210 near McGees Crossroads in Johnston County,
NC.
4. Property Owner / Applicant [PCN Form A3 or A41: Daniel -Lan Development Co. LLC
5. Agent / Consultant [PNC Form A5 — or ORM Consultant ID Number]:
Wyatt Brown, Brown's Environmental Group, Inc.
6. Related Action ID Number(s) [PCN Form 135b]: Prior AID# SAW-2015-01037
7. Project Location— Coordinates, Street Address, and/or Location Description [PCN Form Blb]:
Site address: 12714 Hwy 210; Benson, NC
Lat: 35.51340 N;-78.57139
8. Project Location— Tax Parcel ID [PCN Form Bla]: See Attached Property Table
9. Project Location — County [PCN Form A2b]: Johnston
10. Project Location — Nearest Municipality or Town [PCN Form A2c]: Benson, NC
11. Project Information — Nearest Waterbody [PCN Form 132a]: Pole Branch; Beaverdam Branch
12. Watershed / 8-Digit Hydrologic Unit Code [PCN Form 132c]: 03020201
Authorization: Section 10 ❑ Section 404 ❑✓
Regulatory Action Type:
❑ Standard Permit
❑✓ Nationwide Permit #
❑Regional General Permit #
✓ Jurisdictional Determination Request
Section 10 and 404 ❑
❑ Pre -Application Request
❑ Unauthorized Activity
❑ Compliance
❑ No Permit Required
Revised 20150602

Jurisdictional Determination Request
a]
US Army Corps
of Engineers.
Wilmington District
This form is intended for use by anyone requesting a jurisdictional determination (JD) from the
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District (Corps). Please include all supporting
information, as described within each category, with your request. You may submit your request
to the appropriate Corps Field Office (or project manager, if known) via mail, electronic mail, or
facsimile. A current list of county assignments by Field Office and project manager can be
found on-line at: http://www.saw.usace.army.mil/Missions/RegulatoryPermitPro rg am.aspx , by
telephoning: 910-251-4633, or by contacting any of the field offices listed below:
ASHEVILLE REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
151 Patton Avenue, Room 208
Asheville, North Carolina 28801-5006
General Number: [phone]
Fax Number: [phone]
RALEIGH REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587
General Number: [phone]
Fax Number: [phone]
WASHINGTON REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
2407 West Fifth Street
Washington, North Carolina 27889
General Number: [phone]
Fax Number: [phone]
WILMINGTON REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
69 Darlington Avenue
Wilmington, North Carolina 28403
General Number: 910-251-4633
Fax Number: [phone]
Version: December 2013 Page 1

Jurisdictional Determination Request
INSTRUCTIONS:
All requestors must complete Parts A, B, C, D, E and F.
NOTE TO CONSULTANTS AND AGENCIES: If you are requesting a JD on behalf of a
paying client or your agency, please note the specific submittal requirements in Part G.
NOTE ON PART D — PROPERTY OWNER AUTHORIZATION: Please be aware that all JD
requests must include the current property owner authorization for the Corps to proceed with the
determination, which may include inspection of the property when necessary. This form must be
signed by the current property owner to be considered a complete request.
NOTE ON PART D - NCDOT REQUESTS: Property owner authorization/notification for JD
requests associated with North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) projects will be
conducted according to the current NCDOT/USACE protocols.
NOTE TO USDA PROGRAM PARTICIPANTS: A Corps approved or preliminary JD may not
be valid for the wetland conservation provisions of the Food Security Act of 1985. If you or
your tenant are USDA Program participants, or anticipate participation in USDA programs, you
should also request a certified wetland determination from the local office of the Natural
Resources Conservation Service, prior to starting work.
Version: December 2013 Page 2

Jurisdictional Determination Request
A. PARCEL INFORMATION
Street Address:
City, State:
County:
Directions:
12700 A NC HWY 210
Benson, NC 27504
Johnston
1-40 east to 210, head south on 210, property - 2 miles on right and left
Parcel Index Number(s) (PIN):
B. REQUESTOR INFORMATION
Name:
Mailing Address:
Telephone Number:
Electronic Mail Addresst:
See Attached Property Table
Wyatt Brown, Brown's Env Group, Inc
242 Batten Farm Road, Selma NC 27576
919-524-5956
[e-mail]
Select one:
❑ I am the current property owner.
❑✓ I am an Authorized Agent or Environmental Consultant
❑ Interested Buyer or Under Contract to Purchase
❑ Other, please explain.
C. PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION
Name: Daniels -Lan Development Co. LLC
Mailing Address: 2701 Polenta Road
Clayton, NC 27520
Telephone Number:
Electronic Mail Address3:
0 Proof of Ownership Attached (e.g. a copy of Deed, County GIS/Parcel/Tax Record data)
1 If available
Z Must attach completed Agent Authorization Form
3 If available
Version: December 2013 Page 3

Jurisdictional Determination Request
D. PROPERTY OWNER CERTIFICATION
I, the undersigned, a duly authorized owner of record of the property/properties identified herein,
do authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps)
to enter upon the property herein described for the purpose of conducting on -site investigations
and issuing a determination associated with Waters of the U.S. subject to Federal jurisdiction
under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of
1899.
see attached letter
Property Owner (please print)
Property Owner Signature
E. JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION TYPE
Select One:
Date
❑✓ I am requesting that the Corps provide a preliminarX JD for the property identified herein.
This request does include a delineation.
❑ I am requesting that the Corps provide a preliminarX JD for the property identified herein.
This request does NOT include a delineation.
❑ I am requesting that the Corps investigate the property/project area for the presence or
absence of WOUS5 and provide an approved JD for the property identified herein. This
request does NOT include a request for a verified delineation.
❑ I am requesting that the Corps delineate the boundaries of all WoUS on a property/project
area and provide an approved JD (this may or may not include a survey plat).
❑✓ I am requesting that the Corps evaluate and approve a delineation of WoUS (conducted
by others) on a property/project area and provide an approved JD (may or may not
include a survey plat).
4 For NCDOT requests following the current NCDOT/USACE protocols, skip to Part E.
5 Waters of the United States
Version: December 2013 Page 4

Jurisdictional Determination Request
F. ALL REQUESTS
❑✓ Map of Property or Project Area (attached). This Map must clearly depict the boundaries
of the area of evaluation.
❑✓ Size of Property or Project Area -127
acres
✓Q I verify that the property (or project) boundaries have recently been surveyed and marked
by a licensed land surveyor OR are otherwise clearly marked or distinguishable.
G. JD REQUESTS FROM CONSULTANTS OR AGENCIES
(1) Preliminary JD Requests:
❑✓ Completed and signed Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Form6.
❑✓
Project Coordinates: 35.51340
Latitude-78.57139
Maps (no larger than I Ix17) with Project Boundary Overlay:
Longitude
❑✓ Large and small scale maps that depict, at minimum: streets, intersections, towns
❑✓ Aerial Photography of the project area
❑✓ USGS Topographic Map
❑✓ Soil Survey Map
Other Maps, as appropriate (e.g. National Wetland Inventory Map, Proposed Site
Plan, previous delineation maps, LIDAR maps, FEMA floodplain maps)
6 See Appendix A of this Form. From Regulatory Guidance Letter No. 08-02, dated June 26, 2008
Version: December 2013 Page 5

Jurisdictional Determination Request
Delineation Information (when applicable):
Wetlands:
❑✓ Wetland Data Sheets
Tributaries:
❑ USACE Assessment Forms
Upland Data Sheets Other Assessment Forms
(when appropriate)
Landscape Photos, if taken
✓❑ Field Sketch overlain on legible Map that includes:
■ All aquatic resources (for sites with multiple resources, label and identify)
■ Locations of wetland data points and/or tributary assessment reaches
■ Locations of photo stations
■ Approximate acreage/linear footage of aquatic resources
(2) Approved JDs including Verification of a Delineation:
7 Project Coordinates: 35.51783 Latitude-78.56760 Longitude
Maps (no larger than I Ix17) with Project Boundary Overlay:
❑✓ Large and small scale maps that depict, at minimum: streets, intersections, towns
❑✓ Aerial Photography of the project area
❑✓ USGS Topographic Map
❑✓ Soil Survey Map
❑✓ Other Maps, as appropriate (e.g. National Wetland Inventory Map, Proposed Site Plan,
previous delineation maps)
1987 Manual Regional Supplements and Data forms can be found at:
http://www.usace.army.miI/Missions/CivilWorks/RegulatoryProgramandPermits/ree supp.aspx
Wetland and Stream Assessment Methodologies can be found at:
http://Portal.ncdenr.orp/c/document library/get file?uuid=76f3c58b-dab8-4960-ba43-45b7faf06f4c&groupld=38364and,
http://www.saw.usace.army.mil/Portals/59/docs/regulatory/publicnotices/2013/NCSAM Draft User Manual 130318.pdf
8 Delineation information must include, at minimum, one wetland data sheet for each wetland/community type.
Version: December 2013 Page 6

Jurisdictional Determination Request
Delineation Information (when applicable):
Wetlands:
❑ Wetland Data Sheets
Tributaries:
❑ USACE Assessment Forms
❑ Upland Data Sheets ❑ Other Assessment Forms
(when appropriate)
❑ Landscape Photos, if taken
❑✓ Field Sketch overlain on legible Map that includes:
• All aquatic resources (for sites with multiple resources, label and identify)
• Locations of wetland data points and/or tributary assessment reaches
• Locations of photo stations
• Approximate acreage/linear footage of aquatic resources
Supporting Jurisdictional Information (for Approved JDs only)
❑ Approved Jurisdictional Determination Form(s) (also known as "Rapanos
Form(s)")
Map(s) depicting the potential (or lack of potential) hydrologic connection(s),
adjacency, etc. to navigable waters.
9 Delineation information must include, at minimum, one wetland data sheet for each wetland/community type.
Version: December 2013 Page 7

Jurisdictional Determination Request
I. REQUESTS FOR CORPS APPROVAL OF SURVEY PLAT
Prior to final production of a Plat, the Wilmington District recommends that the Land
Surveyor electronically submit a draft of a Survey Plat to the Corps project manager for
review.
Due to storage limitations of our administrative records, the Corps requires that all hard -
copy submittals include at least one original Plat (to scale) that is no larger than 11"x17"
(the use of match lines for larger tracts acceptable). Additional copies of a plat, including
those larger than 11"x17", may also be submitted for Corps signature as needed. The
Corps also accepts electronic submittals of plats, such as those transmitted as a Portable
Document Format (PDF) file. Upon verification, the Corps can electronically sign these
plats and return them via e-mail to the requestor.
(1) PLATS SUBMITTED FOR APPROVAL
❑ Must be sealed and signed by a licensed professional land surveyor
❑ Must be to scale (all maps must include both a graphic scale and a verbal scale)
❑ Must be legible
❑ Must include a North Arrow, Scale(s), Title, Property Information
❑ Must include a legible WoUS Delineation Table of distances and bearings/metes
and bounds/GPS coordinates of all surveyed delineation points
❑ Must clearly depict surveyed property or project boundaries
❑ Must clearly identify the known surveyed point(s) used as reference (e.g. property
corner, USGS monument)
❑ When wetlands are depicted:
• Must include acreage (or square footage) of wetland polygons
• Must identify each wetland polygon using an alphanumeric system
Version: December 2013 Page 8

Jurisdictional Determination Request
❑ When tributaries are depicted:
• Must include either a surveyed, approximate centerline of tributary with
approximate width of tributary OR surveyed Ordinary High Water Marks
(OHWM) of tributary
• Must identify each tributary using an alphanumeric system
• Must include linear footage of tributaries and calculated area (using approximate
widths or surveyed OHWM)
• Must include name of tributary (based on the most recent USGS topographic
map) or, when no USGS name exists, identify as "unnamed tributary"
❑ all depicted WoUS (wetland polygons and tributary lines) must intersect or tie -to
surveyed project/property boundaries
❑ Must include the location of wetland data points and/or tributary assessment
reaches
❑ Must include, label accordingly, and depict acreage of all waters not currently
subject to the requirements of the CWA (e.g. "isolated wetlands", "non -
jurisdictional waters"). NOTE: An approved JD must be conducted in order to
make an official Corps determination that a particular waterbody or wetland is not
jurisdictional.
❑ Must include and survey all existing conveyances (pipes, culverts, etc.) that
transport WoUS
Version: December 2013 Page 9

Jurisdictional Determination Request
(2) CERTIFICATION LANGUAGE
❑ When the entire actual Jurisdictional Boundary is depicted:
include the following Corps Certification language:
"This certifies that this copy of this plat accurately depicts the boundary of the jurisdiction
of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act as determined by the undersigned on this date.
Unless there is a change in the law or our published regulations, the determination of
Section 404 jurisdiction may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five (5) years from
this date. The undersigned completed this determination utilizing the appropriate Regional
Supplement to the 1987 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual."
Regulatory Official:
Title:
Date:
USACE Action ID No.:
❑ When uplands may be present within a depicted Jurisdictional Boundary
include the following Corps Certification language:
"This certifies that this copy of this plat identifies all areas of waters of the United States
regulated pursuant to Section 404 of the Clean Water Act as determined by the
undersigned on this date. Unless there is change in the law or our published regulations,
this determination of Section 404 jurisdiction may be relied upon for a period not to exceed
five years from this date. The undersigned completed this determination utilizing the
appropriate Regional Supplement to the 1987 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Wetlands
Delineation Manual."
Regulatory Official:
Title:
Date:
USACE Action ID No.:
Version: December 2013 Page 10

Jurisdictional Determination Request
(3) GPS SURVEYS
For Surveys prepared using a Global Positioning System (GPS), the Survey must include
all of the above, as well as:
❑ be at sub -meter accuracy at each survey point.
❑ include an accuracy verification:
One or more known points (property corner, monument) shall be located with the
GPS and cross-referenced with the existing traditional property survey (metes and
bounds).
❑ include a brief description of the GPS equipment utilized.
Version: December 2013 Page 11

Appendix 2 - PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (PJD) FORM
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR PJD: 3/25/19
B. NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERSON REQUESTING PJD: Wyatt Brown, Brown's Environmental Group, Inc
C. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER: SAW-2015-01037
D. PROJECT LOCATION(S) AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
(USE THE TABLE BELOW TO DOCUMENT MULTIPLE AQUATIC RESOURCES AND/OR
AQUATIC RESOURCES AT DIFFERENT SITES)
State: NC County/parish/borough: Johnston City: Benson
Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format):
Lat.: 35.52340 Long.:-78.51739
Universal Transverse Mercator: NAD83
Name of nearest waterbody: Pole Branch, Beaverdam Branch
E. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
❑ Office (Desk) Determination. Date:
❑ Field Determination. Date(s):
TABLE OF AQUATIC RESOURCES IN REVIEW AREA WHICH "MAY BE" SUBJECT TO REGULATORY
JURISDICTION.
Site
number
Latitude
(decimal
degrees)
Longitude
(decimal
degrees)
Estimated amount
of aquatic resource
in review area
(acreage and linear
feet, if applicable)
Type of aquatic
resource (i.e., wetland
vs. non -wetland
waters)
Geographic authority
to which the aquatic
resource "may be"
subject (i.e., Section
404 or Section 10/404)
Stream 1
35.51991
-78.56722
1458 ft
non -wetland
404
Stream 2
35.51851
-78.56722
452 ft
non -wetland
404
Stream 3
35.51586
-78.56613
367 ft
non -wetland
404
Stream 4
35.50898
-78.56889
239 ft
non -wetland
404
Stream 5
35.51150
-78.58287
886 ft
non -wetland
404
Stream 6
35.51383
-78.57097
1425 ft
non -wetland
404

TABLE OF AQUATIC RESOURCES IN REVIEW AREA WHICH "MAY BE" SUBJECT TO REGULATORY JURISDICTION
Site Number
Lot
Long
Estimated
amount of
aquatic resource
in Review Area
(LF/AC)
Type of Aquatic resource
Geographic
authority to
which the aquatic
resouorce "may
be" subject
Stream 1
35.51991
-78.56722
1,458
Potential Non -wetland Waters
4041401
Stream 2
35.51851
-78.56722
452
Potential Non -wetland Waters
4041401
Stream 3
35.51586
-78.56613
367
Potential Non -wetland Waters
4041401
Stream 4
35.50898
-78.56889
239
Potential Non -wetland Waters
4041401
Stream 5
35.51150
-78.58287
886
Potential Non -wetland Waters
4041401
Stream 6
35.51383
-78.57097
1425
Potential Non -wetland Waters
4041401
4,827
Wetland A
35.51394
-78.57181
0.25
Potential Wetland
4041401
Wetland 8
35.51256
-78.57121
0.2
Potential Wetland
4041401
Wetland C
35.5116
-78.57532
0.27
Potential Wetland
4041401
Wetland D
35.51017
-78.57484
0.45
Potential Wetland
4041401
Wetland E
35.51101
-78.57326
0.04
Potential Wetland
4041401
Wetland F
35.51416
-78.57083
0.32
Potential Wetland
4041401
Wetland G
35.50913
-78.57169
0.02
Potential Wetland
4041401
Wetland 1
35.52000
-78.56945
12
Potential Wetland
4041401
Wetland J
35.51812
-78.56652
0.008
Potential Wetland
4041401
13.558

1) The Corps of Engineers believes that there may be jurisdictional aquatic resources in
the review area, and the requestor of this PJD is hereby advised of his or her option
to request and obtain an approved JD (AJD) for that review area based on an
informed decision after having discussed the various types of JDs and their
characteristics and circumstances when they may be appropriate.
2) In any circumstance where a permit applicant obtains an individual permit, or a
Nationwide General Permit (NWP) or other general permit verification requiring "pre -
construction notification" (PCN), or requests verification for a non -reporting NWP or
other general permit, and the permit applicant has not requested an AJD for the
activity, the permit applicant is hereby made aware that: (1) the permit applicant has
elected to seek a permit authorization based on a PJD, which does not make an
official determination of jurisdictional aquatic resources; (2) the applicant has the
option to request an AJD before accepting the terms and conditions of the permit
authorization, and that basing a permit authorization on an AJD could possibly result
in less compensatory mitigation being required or different special conditions; (3) the
applicant has the right to request an individual permit rather than accepting the terms
and conditions of the NWP or other general permit authorization; (4) the applicant can
accept a permit authorization and thereby agree to comply with all the terms and
conditions of that permit, including whatever mitigation requirements the Corps has
determined to be necessary; (5) undertaking any activity in reliance upon the subject
permit authorization without requesting an AJD constitutes the applicant's acceptance
of the use of the PJD; (6) accepting a permit authorization (e.g., signing a proffered
individual permit) or undertaking any activity in reliance on any form of Corps permit
authorization based on a PJD constitutes agreement that all aquatic resources in the
review area affected in any way by that activity will be treated as jurisdictional, and
waives any challenge to such jurisdiction in any administrative or judicial compliance
or enforcement action, or in any administrative appeal or in any Federal court; and (7)
whether the applicant elects to use either an AJD or a PJD, the JD will be processed
as soon as practicable. Further, an AJD, a proffered individual permit (and all terms
and conditions contained therein), or individual permit denial can be administratively
appealed pursuant to 33 C.F.R. Part 331. If, during an administrative appeal, it
becomes appropriate to make an official determination whether geographic
jurisdiction exists over aquatic resources in the review area, or to provide an official
delineation of jurisdictional aquatic resources in the review area, the Corps will
provide an AJD to accomplish that result, as soon as is practicable. This PJD finds
that there "may be"waters of the U.S. and/or that there "may be" navigable waters of
the U.S. on the subject review area, and identifies all aquatic features in the review
area that could be affected by the proposed activity, based on the following
information:

SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for PJD (check all that apply)
Checked items should be included in subject file. Appropriately reference sources
below where indicated for all checked items:
❑■ Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor:
Map:
0 Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor.
❑ Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report.
❑ Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report. Rationale:
❑ Data sheets prepared by the Corps:
❑ Corps navigable waters' study:
❑ U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas:
❑ USGS NHD data.
❑ USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps.
❑■ U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name: 1:24K Benson Quadrangle, 2016
0 Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation: Johnston County, NC Map Sheet 5
❑ National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name:
❑ State/local wetland inventory map(s):
❑ FEMA/FIRM maps:
❑ 100-year Floodplain Elevation is: .(National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929)
❑■ Photographs: ❑■ Aerial (Name & Date): NCOneMap 2017; Google Earth 2018
or ❑ Other (Name & Date):
❑ Previous determination (s). File no. and date of response letter:
❑ Other information (please specify):
IMPORTANT NOTE: The information recorded on this form has not necessarily
been verified by the Corps and should not be relied upon for later jurisdictional
determinations.
Signature and date of
Regulatory staff member
completing PJD
yatt own
Wyatt Brown Datle: tally 20119.04.14Y1�33:12r04'00'
Signature and date of
person requesting PJD
(REQUIRED, unless obtaining
the signature is impracticable)'
' Districts may establish timeframes for requestor to return signed PJD forms. If the requestor does not respond
within the established time frame, the district may presume concurrence and no additional follow up is
necessary prior to finalizing an action.

March 20, 2019
US Army Corps of Engineers
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587
Mr. Ross Sullivan
Re: Daniels Farm , Johnston County
I, the undersigned, a duly authorized owner of record of the property/properties identified herein, do
authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) to enter upon
the property herein described for the purpose of conducting on -site investigations and issuing a
determination associated with Waters of the U.S. subject to Federal jurisdiction under Section 404 of
the Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899. The property's PIN
numbers are: 162400-74-5061, 162400-83-2985, 162400-83-4257, 162400-93-0696, 162400-71-1041
and 163400-73-6001..
Also, Mr. Wyatt Brown of Brown's Environmental Group, Inc. has my permission to act as my agent on
this property concerning wetlands and streams.
Lanny Clifton
Daniel -Lan Development, LLC

* * * DISCLAIMER * * *
Johnston County assumes no legal responsibility for the information represented here.
Result 1
id: 13EO4003A
MC G,EE'R-D`
Tag: 13E04003A
N C P i n: 162400-84-4154
Mapsheet No: 1624
Owner Name 1: DANIEL-LAN DEVELOPMENT,
LLC
Owner Name 2:
Mail Address 1: 1075 COUNTRY CLUB RD
❑
Mail Address 2:
Mail Address 3: SMITHFIELD, NC 27577-8310
Site Address 1: 12700 A NC HWY 210
❑
Site Address 2: BENSON, NC 27504-
Book: 05073
Page: 0079
D
Market Value: 107820
QO
Assessed Acreage: 13.270
Calc. Acreage: 13.270
Sales Price: 2174000
Sale Date: 2017-12-13
PH 1
N
Scale: 1:10060 - 1 in. = 838.33 feet
Johnston County GIS
(The scale is only accurate when printed landscape on a 8 1/2 x 11 size sheet with no page scaling.) February 3, 2021

* * * DISCLAIMER * * *
Johnston County assumes no legal responsibility for the information represented here.
Result 2
id:
13EO4003A
Tag:
13EO4003A
N C P i n:
162400-84-4154
Mapsheet No:
1624
Owner Name 1:
DANIEL-LAN DEVELOPMENT,
LLC
Owner Name 2:
Mail Address 1:
1075 COUNTRY CLUB RD
Mail Address 2:
Mail Address 3:
SMITHFIELD, NC 27577-8310
Site Address 1:
12741 NC HWY 210
Site Address 2:
BENSON, NC 27504-
Book:
05073
Page:
0079
Market Value:
107820
Assessed Acreage:
13.270
Calc. Acreage:
13.270
Sales Price:
2174000
Sale Date:
2017-12-13

Iff ?L L k
\J V
KIMFOd
RP 4ZE RP q
Xv
'G�fn
13
I g.r.
�l
®
Figure
Location Map
Daniel Farm Subdivision
NC Hwy 210
Johnston County, NC
Scale
NTS
03/19/21
By: MRR

FQFigure
2A
Aerial Photograph
Image Date: 2016
Daniel Farm North
NC Hwy 210
IM
�3
aaown
By: MRR
Source: NCOneMap Imagery
Johnston County, NC
05/24/21

FalFigure
2B
Aerial Photograph
Image Date: 2018
Daniel Farm North
NC Hwy 210
Scale
aaown 5
By: MRR
Source: NCOneMap Imagery
Johnston County, NC
05/24/21

Legend
Q Daniel Farm North Review Boundary
os
roads_
0
FeFigure
By: MRR
3
USGS Topographic Map
Edmondson Quadrangle
Source: TNM/USGS Mapping Services
Daniel Farm North
NC Hwy 210
Johnston County, NC
care
NTS
BROWN'S
05/24/21

Legend
Q Daniel Farm North Review Boundary
'Or'l U
:�
R
®Figure
By: MRR
4
NRCS Soil Survey Map
Soil Survey of Johnston County
Map Sheet 5
Daniel Farm North
NC Hwy 210
Johnston County, NC
Scale
NTS
aaown 5
05/24/21

Wetland I, 12.0 ac.
* * * DISCLAIMER * * *
John ton County assumes no legal responsibility for the information represented here.
-- �!1!lit
KW
- Stream 1, 1458 ft.
Stream 2, 452 ft. y
Z Stream 3, 367 ft.
r `
Stream 5, 886 ft.
Stream 6, 1425 ft. '+
Wetland C.27 ac —
Wetland E, .40 ac
Wetland D .45 ac
Wetland F, .320
Wetland B, .20 ac
Wetland A,.25 ac
Wetland J, .008 ac
Stream 4, 239 ft
M �
Wetland G .02 ac
x
Scale: 1:9864 - 1 in. = 821.97 feet
(The scale is only accurate when printed landscape on a 8 1/2 x 11 size sheet with no page scaling.)
l:•
Johnston County GIS
April 15, 2019

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site: Matthews
Applicant/Owner: Daniels -Lan Dev, LLC
Investigator(s): Wyatt Brown
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Wet flat
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P
City/County: Johnston
State: NC
Section, Township, Range: Cleveland
Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave
Lat: 35.51255
Long:-78.57180
3/12/15
Sampling Date:
Sampling Point: A
Slope (%): 1
Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: Bibb NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes ® No ❑ (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation ❑ , Soil ❑ , or Hydrology ❑ significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes ® No ❑
Are Vegetation ❑ , Soil ❑ , or Hydrology ❑ naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes F� No D
Is the Sampled Area
ICI
Hydric Soil Present? Wetland Yes �II�OII No D within a Wetland? Yes DI No
Hydrology Present? Yes —DI No
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
X Surface Water (Al)
❑ Aquatic Fauna (1313)
High Water Table (A2)
❑ Marl Deposits (B15) (LRR U)
Saturation (A3)
❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
Water Marks (131)
❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
❑ Sediment Deposits (132)
❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
Drift Deposits (63)
❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
❑ Algal Mat or Crust (134)
❑ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
❑ Iron Deposits (135)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (67)
IQ Water -Stained Leaves (139)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes X No Q Depth (inches): 12 in
Water Table Present? Yes M No F� Depth (inches): 4 in
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
Drainage Patterns (1310)
Il Moss Trim Lines (B16)
El Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
❑ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
El Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Geomorphic Position (D2)
Shallow Aquitard (D3)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
n Sphaanum moss 08) (LRR T. U)
Saturation Present? Yes M No F� Depth (inches): 4 in I Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes M No
gauge, mon
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region —Version 2.0

Remarks:
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 5 (A)
Total Number of Dominant 5
Species Across All Strata: (B)
Percent of Dominant Species 100
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species x 1 =
FACW species x 2 =
FAC species x 3 =
FACU species x 4 =
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals: (A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
L_I 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
3 - Prevalence Index is 53.0'
L_I Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree — Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
larger in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub — Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft. (1 m) tall.
Herb —All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody vine — All woody vines, greater than 3.28 ft. in
height.
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region —Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) — Use scientific names of plants.
Absolute Dominant
Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft radius )
% Cover Species?
Status
1 Liquidambar styraciflua
30
Fac
2 Salix alba
50
Fac W
3.
❑
4.
❑
5.
❑
6.
❑
7.
❑
8.
F-1
80 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20
20% of total cover: 16
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft radius )
1 Acer rubum
40
Fac
2 Liquidambar styraciflua
10
Fac
3.-
❑
4.
❑
5.
❑
6.
❑
7.
❑
8.
50 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 25
20% of total cover 10
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft raadius )
1 Juncus
10
Fac W
2.
❑
3.
❑
4.
❑
5.
❑
6.
❑
7.
❑
8.
❑
9.
❑
10.
❑
11.
❑
12.
❑
10 = Total Cover
50% of total cover:—5—
20% of total cover:-2—
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
❑
2.
❑
3.
❑
4.
❑
5.
❑
= Total Cover
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below)
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present?
Sampling Point:
Yes M No El
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region —Version 2.0

OUIL Sampling roint:
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Loc2 Texture Remarks
0-12 10YR 2/1 100 sl
12=14 10YR 4 /1 100 CS scl
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. zLocation: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
El Histosol (Al)
❑ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U)
II 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
❑ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
Il 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
Ej Black Histic (A3)
❑ Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
Stratified Layers (A5)
M Depleted Matrix (F3)
n Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 15313)
El Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
❑ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
II Red Parent Material (TF2)
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
❑ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
II Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
❑ Redox Depressions (F8)
II Other (Explain in Remarks)
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
❑ Marl (F10) (LRR U)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (All 1)
❑ Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
❑ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T)
'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A) ❑ Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
must be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
El Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S)
❑ Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
❑ Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 150B)
EJ Sandy Redox (S5)
❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
El Stripped Matrix (S6)
❑ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
El Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
Hydric Soil Present? Yes M No
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region —Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site: Matthews
Applicant/Owner: Daniels -Lan Dev, LLC
Investigator(s): Wyatt Brown
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Wet flat
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P
City/County: Johnston
State: NC
Section, Township, Range: Cleveland
Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave
Lat: 35.51269
Long:-78.57121
3/12/15
Sampling Date:
Sampling Point: B
Slope (%): 1
Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: Gilead NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes ® No ❑ (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation ❑ , Soil ❑ , or Hydrology ❑ significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes ® No ❑
Are Vegetation ❑ , Soil ❑ , or Hydrology ❑ naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes F� No D
Is the Sampled Area
ICI
Hydric Soil Present? Wetland Yes �II�OII No D within a Wetland? Yes DI No
Hydrology Present? Yes —DI No
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
Surface Water (Al)
❑ Aquatic Fauna (1313)
❑ High Water Table (A2)
❑ Marl Deposits (B15) (LRR U)
❑ Saturation (A3)
❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
Water Marks (131)
❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
❑ Sediment Deposits (132)
❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
Drift Deposits (63)
❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
❑ Algal Mat or Crust (134)
❑ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
❑ Iron Deposits (135)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (67)
M Water -Stained Leaves (139)
Field Observations:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
Drainage Patterns (1310)
Il Moss Trim Lines (B16)
El Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
❑ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
El Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Geomorphic Position (D2)
Shallow Aquitard (D3)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
n Sphaanum moss 08) (LRR T. U)
Surface Water Present? Yes No _1I�0I1 Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes F] No _1I�0I1 Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes M No Depth (inches): 8 in Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes V No D
(includes caoillary frinae)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region —Version 2.0

Remarks:
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 5 (A)
Total Number of Dominant 5
Species Across All Strata: (B)
Percent of Dominant Species 100
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species x 1 =
FACW species x 2 =
FAC species x 3 =
FACU species x 4 =
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals: (A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
L_I 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
3 - Prevalence Index is 53.0'
L_I Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree — Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
larger in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub — Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft. (1 m) tall.
Herb —All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody vine — All woody vines, greater than 3.28 ft. in
height.
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region —Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) — Use scientific names of plants.
Absolute Dominant
Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft radius )
% Cover Species?
Status
1 Liquidambar styraciflua
50
Fac
2 Salix alba
20
Fac W
3.
❑
4.
❑
5.
❑
6.
❑
7.
❑
8.
F-1
70 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 35
20% of total cover: 14
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft radius )
1 Acer rubum
30
Fac
2 Liquidambar styraciflua
10
Fac
3.-
❑
4.
❑
5.
❑
6.
❑
7.
❑
8.
40 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 10
20% of total cover 8
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft raadius )
1 Juncus
10
Fac W
2.
❑
3.
❑
4.
❑
5.
❑
6.
❑
7.
❑
8.
❑
9.
❑
10.
❑
11.
❑
12.
❑
10 = Total Cover
50% of total cover:—5—
20% of total cover:-2—
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
❑
2.
❑
3.
❑
4.
❑
5.
❑
= Total Cover
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below)
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present?
Sampling Point:
Yes M No El
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region —Version 2.0

OUIL Sampling roint:
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Loc2 Texture Remarks
0-3 10YR 3/1 100 sl
4-12 10YR 7/1 100 CS scl
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. zLocation: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
El Histosol (Al)
❑ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U)
II 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
❑ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
Il 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
Ej Black Histic (A3)
❑ Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
Stratified Layers (A5)
M Depleted Matrix (F3)
n Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 15313)
El Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
❑ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
II Red Parent Material (TF2)
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
❑ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
II Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
❑ Redox Depressions (F8)
II Other (Explain in Remarks)
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
❑ Marl (F10) (LRR U)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (All 1)
❑ Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
❑ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T)
'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A) ❑ Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
must be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
El Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S)
❑ Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
❑ Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 150B)
EJ Sandy Redox (S5)
❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
El Stripped Matrix (S6)
❑ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
El Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
Hydric Soil Present? Yes M No
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region —Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site: Matthews
Applicant/Owner: Daniels -Lan Dev, LLC
Investigator(s): Wyatt Brown
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Wet flat
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P
City/County: Johnston
State: NC
Section, Township, Range: Cleveland
Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave
Lat: 35.51012
Long:-78.57491
3/12/15
Sampling Date:
Sampling Point: C, D, E
Slope (%): 1
Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: Gilead D slope NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes ® No ❑ (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation ❑ , Soil ❑ , or Hydrology ❑ significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes ® No ❑
Are Vegetation ❑ , Soil ❑ , or Hydrology ❑ naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes F� No D
Is the Sampled Area
ICI
Hydric Soil Present? Wetland Yes �II�OII No D within a Wetland? Yes DI No
Hydrology Present? Yes —DI No
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
Surface Water (Al)
❑ Aquatic Fauna (1313)
High Water Table (A2)
❑ Marl Deposits (B15) (LRR U)
Saturation (A3)
❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
❑ Water Marks (131)
❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
❑ Sediment Deposits (132)
❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
❑ Drift Deposits (63)
❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
❑ Algal Mat or Crust (134)
❑ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
❑ Iron Deposits (135)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (67)
M Water -Stained Leaves (139)
Field Observations: ICI
Surface Water Present? Yes M No F� Depth (inches): 1 inch
Water Table Present? Yes M No F� Depth (inches): surface
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
Drainage Patterns (1310)
Il Moss Trim Lines (B16)
El Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
❑ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Geomorphic Position (D2)
Shallow Aquitard (D3)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
n Sphaanum moss 08) (LRR T. U)
Saturation Present? Yes M No F� Depth (inches): surface I Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes M No
gauge, mon
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region —Version 2.0

Remarks:
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 6 (A)
Total Number of Dominant 6
Species Across All Strata: (B)
Percent of Dominant Species 100
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species x 1 =
FACW species x 2 =
FAC species x 3 =
FACU species x 4 =
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals: (A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
L_I 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
3 - Prevalence Index is 53.0'
L_I Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree — Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
larger in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub — Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft. (1 m) tall.
Herb —All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody vine — All woody vines, greater than 3.28 ft. in
height.
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region —Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) — Use scientific names of plants.
Absolute
Dominant
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft radius )
% Cover
Species?
1 Liquidambar styraciflua
40
2 Salix alba
10
3.
❑
4.
❑
5.
❑
6.
❑
7.
❑
8.
F-1
50
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 27.5
20% of total cover: 11
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft radius )
1 Acer rubum
40
2 Liquidambar styraciflua
10
3 Rubus spp.
30
4.
❑
5.
❑
6.
❑
7.
❑
8.
80
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 40
20% of total cover 16
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft raadius )
1 Juncus
10
2.
❑
3.
❑
4.
❑
5.
❑
6.
❑
7.
❑
8.
❑
9.
❑
10.
❑
11.
❑
12.
❑
10
= Total Cover
50% of total cover:—5—
20% of total cover:-2—
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
❑
2.
❑
3.
❑
4.
❑
5.
❑
= Total Cover
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below).
Indicator
Status
Fac
Fac W
Fac
Fac
Fac
Fac W
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present?
Sampling Point:
Yes M No El
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region —Version 2.0

OUIL Sampling roint:
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Loc2 Texture Remarks
0-3 10YR 2/1 100 sl
3-11 10YR 5/1 100 CS scl
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. zLocation: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
El Histosol (Al)
❑ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U)
II 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
❑ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
Il 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
Ej Black Histic (A3)
❑ Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
Stratified Layers (A5)
M Depleted Matrix (F3)
n Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 15313)
El Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
❑ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
II Red Parent Material (TF2)
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
❑ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
II Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
❑ Redox Depressions (F8)
II Other (Explain in Remarks)
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
❑ Marl (F10) (LRR U)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (All 1)
❑ Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
❑ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T)
'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A) ❑ Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
must be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
El Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S)
❑ Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
❑ Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 150B)
EJ Sandy Redox (S5)
❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
El Stripped Matrix (S6)
❑ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
El Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
Hydric Soil Present? Yes M No
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region —Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site: Matthews
Applicant/Owner: Daniels -Lan Dev, LLC
Investigator(s): Wyatt Brown
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Wet flat
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P
City/County: Johnston
State: NC
Section, Township, Range: Cleveland
Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave
Lat: 35.51416
Long:-78.57083
3/12/15
Sampling Date:
Sampling Point: Wet F
Slope (%): 0
Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: Gilead NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes ® No ❑ (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation ❑ , Soil ❑ , or Hydrology ❑ significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes ® No ❑
Are Vegetation ❑ , Soil ❑ , or Hydrology ❑ naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes F� No D
Is the Sampled Area
ICI
Hydric Soil Present? Wetland Yes �II�OII No D within a Wetland? Yes DI No
Hydrology Present? Yes —DI No
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
Surface Water (Al)
❑ Aquatic Fauna (1313)
❑ High Water Table (A2)
❑ Marl Deposits (B15) (LRR U)
❑ Saturation (A3)
❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
Water Marks (131)
❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
❑ Sediment Deposits (132)
❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
Drift Deposits (63)
❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
❑ Algal Mat or Crust (134)
❑ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
❑ Iron Deposits (135)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (67)
M Water -Stained Leaves (139)
Field Observations:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
Drainage Patterns (1310)
❑ Moss Trim Lines (B16)
El Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
❑ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Geomorphic Position (D2)
Shallow Aquitard (D3)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
moss 08) (LRR T
Surface Water Present? Yes No _1I�0I1 Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes F] No _1I�0I1 Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes M No Depth (inches): 4 in Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes V No D
(includes caoillary frinae)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region —Version 2.0

Remarks:
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 3 (A)
Total Number of Dominant 3
Species Across All Strata: (B)
Percent of Dominant Species 100
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species x 1 =
FACW species x 2 =
FAC species x 3 =
FACU species x 4 =
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals: (A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
L_I 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
3 - Prevalence Index is 53.0'
L_I Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree — Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
larger in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub — Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft. (1 m) tall.
Herb —All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody vine — All woody vines, greater than 3.28 ft. in
height.
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region —Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Absolute Dominant
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft radius )
% Cover Species?
1.
❑
2.
❑
3.
❑
4.
❑
5.
❑
6.
❑
7.
❑
8.
F-1
= Total Cover
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft radius )
1 Acer rubum
20
2. Liquidambar styraciflua
60
3.-
❑
4.
❑
5.
❑
6.
❑
7.
❑
8.
80 = Total Cover
50% of total cover 40 20% of total cover 6
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft raadius )
1 Juncus
10
2.
❑
3.
❑
4.
❑
5.
❑
6.
❑
7.
❑
8.
❑
9.
❑
10.
❑
11.
❑
12.
❑
10 = Total Cover
50% of total cover:-5-
20% of total cover:-2-
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
❑
2.
❑
3.
❑
4.
❑
5.
❑
= Total Cover
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below).
Indicator
Status
Fac
Fac
Fac W
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present?
Sampling Point:
Yes M No El
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region -Version 2.0

501L
Sampling Point:
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix
Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) %
Color (moist) % Type' Loc2
Texture Remarks
0-3 10YR 3/2 100
sl
4-12 10YR 6/1 100
scl
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
El Histosol (Al)
❑ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U)
II 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
❑ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
Il 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
Ej Black Histic (A3)
❑ Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
Stratified Layers (A5)
M Depleted Matrix (F3)
n Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 15313)
El Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
❑ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
II Red Parent Material (TF2)
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
❑ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
II Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
❑ Redox Depressions (F8)
II Other (Explain in Remarks)
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
❑ Marl (F10) (LRR U)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (All 1)
❑ Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
❑ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T)
'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A) ❑ Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
must be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
El Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S)
❑ Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
❑ Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 150B)
EJ Sandy Redox (S5)
❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
El Stripped Matrix (S6)
❑ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No =
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region —Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site: Matthews
Applicant/Owner: Daniels -Lan Dev, LLC
Investigator(s): Wyatt Brown
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Wet flat
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P
City/County: Johnston
State: NC
Section, Township, Range: Cleveland
Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave
Lat: 35.50906
Long:-78.57174
3/12/15
Sampling Date:
Sampling Point: Wet G
Slope (%): 0
Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: Gilead NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes ® No ❑ (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation ❑ , Soil ❑ , or Hydrology ❑ significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes ® No ❑
Are Vegetation ❑ , Soil ❑ , or Hydrology ❑ naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes F� No D
Is the Sampled Area
ICI
Hydric Soil Present? Wetland Yes �II�OII No D within a Wetland? Yes DI No
Hydrology Present? Yes —DI No
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
Surface Water (Al)
❑ Aquatic Fauna (1313)
❑ High Water Table (A2)
❑ Marl Deposits (B15) (LRR U)
❑ Saturation (A3)
❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
Water Marks (131)
❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
❑ Sediment Deposits (132)
❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
Drift Deposits (63)
❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
❑ Algal Mat or Crust (134)
❑ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
❑ Iron Deposits (135)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (67)
M Water -Stained Leaves (139)
Field Observations:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
Drainage Patterns (1310)
❑ Moss Trim Lines (B16)
El Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
❑ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Geomorphic Position (D2)
Shallow Aquitard (D3)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
moss 08) (LRR T
Surface Water Present? Yes No _1I�0I1 Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes F] No _1I�0I1 Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes M No Depth (inches): 9in Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes V No D
(includes caoillary frinae)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region —Version 2.0

Remarks:
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 3 (A)
Total Number of Dominant 3
Species Across All Strata: (B)
Percent of Dominant Species 100
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species x 1 =
FACW species x 2 =
FAC species x 3 =
FACU species x 4 =
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals: (A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
L_I 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
3 - Prevalence Index is 53.0'
L_I Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree — Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
larger in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub — Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft. (1 m) tall.
Herb —All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody vine — All woody vines, greater than 3.28 ft. in
height.
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region —Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) — Use scientific names of plants.
Absolute Dominant
Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft radius )
% Cover Species?
Status
1 Liquidambar styraciflua
50
Fac
2 Pinus taeda
20 ❑
3.
❑
4.
❑
5.
❑
6.
❑
7.
❑
8.
F-1
70 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 35
20% of total cover: 14
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft radius )
1 Acer rubum
30
Fac
2.
❑
3.-
❑
4.
❑
5.
❑
6.
❑
7.
❑
8.
30 = Total Cover
50% of total cover 15 20% of total cover 6
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft raadius )
1 Juncus
10
Fac W
2.
❑
3.
❑
4.
❑
5.
❑
6.
❑
7.
❑
8.
❑
9.
❑
10.
❑
11.
❑
12.
❑
10 = Total Cover
50% of total cover:—5—
20% of total cover:-2—
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
❑
2.
❑
3.
❑
4.
❑
5.
❑
= Total Cover
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below)
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present?
Sampling Point:
Yes M No El
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region —Version 2.0

501L
Sampling Point:
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix
Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) %
Color (moist) % Type' Loc2
Texture Remarks
0-3 10YR 3/2 100
sl
4-12 10YR 6/2 100
scl
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
El Histosol (Al)
❑ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U)
II 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
❑ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
Il 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
Ej Black Histic (A3)
❑ Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
Stratified Layers (A5)
M Depleted Matrix (F3)
n Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 15313)
El Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
❑ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
II Red Parent Material (TF2)
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
❑ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
II Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
❑ Redox Depressions (F8)
II Other (Explain in Remarks)
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
❑ Marl (F10) (LRR U)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (All 1)
❑ Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
❑ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T)
'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A) ❑ Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
must be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
El Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S)
❑ Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
❑ Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 150B)
EJ Sandy Redox (S5)
❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
El Stripped Matrix (S6)
❑ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No =
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region —Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site: Matthews Property North
Applicant/Owner: Daniels -Lan Dev, LLC
Investigator(s): Wyatt Brown
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Wet flat
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P
City/County: Johnston
Clifton State: NC
Section, Township, Range: Cleveland
Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave
Lat: 35.51812
Long:-78.56652
3/12/15
Sampling Date:
Sampling Point: J
Slope (%): 2
Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: Gilead NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes ® No ❑ (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation ❑ , Soil ❑ , or Hydrology ❑ significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes ® No ❑
Are Vegetation ❑ , Soil ❑ , or Hydrology ❑ naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes F� No D
Is the Sampled Area
ICI
Hydric Soil Present? Wetland Yes �II�OII No D within a Wetland? Yes DI No
Hydrology Present? Yes —DI No
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
Surface Water (Al)
❑ Aquatic Fauna (1313)
High Water Table (A2)
❑ Marl Deposits (B15) (LRR U)
Saturation (A3)
❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
❑ Water Marks (131)
❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
❑ Sediment Deposits (132)
❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
❑ Drift Deposits (63)
❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
❑ Algal Mat or Crust (134)
❑ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
❑ Iron Deposits (135)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (67)
M Water -Stained Leaves (139)
Field Observations: ICI
Surface Water Present? Yes M No F� Depth (inches): 3 inches
Water Table Present? Yes M No F� Depth (inches): surface
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
Drainage Patterns (1310)
Il Moss Trim Lines (B16)
El Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
❑ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Geomorphic Position (D2)
Shallow Aquitard (D3)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
n Sphaanum moss 08) (LRR T. U)
Saturation Present? Yes M No F� Depth (inches): surface I Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes M No
gauge, mon
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region —Version 2.0

Remarks:
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 3 (A)
Total Number of Dominant 3
Species Across All Strata: (B)
Percent of Dominant Species 100
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species x 1 =
FACW species x 2 =
FAC species x 3 =
FACU species x 4 =
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals: (A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
L_I 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
3 - Prevalence Index is 53.0'
L_I Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree — Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
larger in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub — Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft. (1 m) tall.
Herb —All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody vine — All woody vines, greater than 3.28 ft. in
height.
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region —Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) — Use scientific names of plants.
Absolute Dominant
Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft radius )
% Cover Species?
Status
1 Liquidambar styraciflua
20 II
Fac
2.
❑
3 Pinus taeda
60
Fac
4.
❑
5.
❑
6.
❑
7.
❑
8.
F-1
80 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 40
20% of total cover: 16
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft radius )
1 Acer rubum
30
Fac
4.
❑
5.
❑
6.
❑
7.
❑
8.
30 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 15
20% of total cover 6
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft raadius )
1 Juncus
10
Fac W
2.
❑
3.
❑
4.
❑
5.
❑
6.
❑
7.
❑
8.
❑
9.
❑
10.
❑
11.
❑
12.
❑
10 = Total Cover
50% of total cover:—5—
20% of total cover:-2—
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
❑
2.
❑
3.
❑
4.
❑
5.
❑
= Total Cover
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below)
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present?
Sampling Point:
Yes M No El
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region —Version 2.0

501L
Sampling Point:
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix
Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) %
Color (moist) % Type' Loc2
Texture Remarks
0-6 10YR 3/1 100
sl
6-12 10YR 6/1 100
scl
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
El Histosol (Al)
❑ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U)
II 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
❑ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
Il 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
Ej Black Histic (A3)
❑ Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
Stratified Layers (A5)
M Depleted Matrix (F3)
n Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 15313)
El Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
❑ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
II Red Parent Material (TF2)
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
❑ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
II Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
❑ Redox Depressions (F8)
II Other (Explain in Remarks)
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
❑ Marl (F10) (LRR U)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (All 1)
❑ Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
❑ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T)
'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A) ❑ Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
must be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
El Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S)
❑ Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
❑ Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 150B)
EJ Sandy Redox (S5)
❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
El Stripped Matrix (S6)
❑ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No =
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region —Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site: Matthews
Applicant/Owner: Daniel G Daniels -Lan Dev, LLC
Investigator(s): Wyatt Brown
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Hill sl
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P
City/County: Johnston
Clifton State: NC
Section, Township, Range: Cleveland
Local relief (concave, convex, none): convex
Lat: 35.50949
Long:-78.57321
3/12/15
Sampling Date:
Sampling Point: Dry North
Slope (%): 4
Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: Nankin NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes ® No ❑ (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation ❑ , Soil ❑ , or Hydrology ❑ significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes ® No ❑
Are Vegetation ❑ , Soil ❑ , or Hydrology ❑ naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes El No
ICI Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Wetland Yes El
No within a Wetland? Yes F-] No DI
Hydrology Present? Yes = No
Remarks:
Sample taken in yellow pine forest.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
❑ Surface Water (Al)
❑ Aquatic Fauna (1313)
❑ High Water Table (A2)
❑ Marl Deposits (B15) (LRR U)
❑ Saturation (A3)
❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
❑ Water Marks (131)
❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
❑ Sediment Deposits (132)
❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
❑ Drift Deposits (63)
❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
❑ Algal Mat or Crust (134)
❑ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
❑ Iron Deposits (135)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (67)
❑ Water -Stained Leaves (139)
Field Observations: ICI
Surface Water Present? Yes f1 No Toll Depth (inches)
Water Table Present? Yes f1 No M Depth (inches)
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
Drainage Patterns (1310)
Il Moss Trim Lines (B16)
El Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
❑ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Geomorphic Position (D2)
Shallow Aquitard (D3)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
n SDhaanum moss 08) (LRR T. U)
Saturation Present? Yes f1 No M Depth (inches): I Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes E] No M
gauge, mon
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region —Version 2.0

Remarks:
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 2 (A)
Total Number of Dominant 2
Species Across All Strata: (B)
Percent of Dominant Species 100
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species x 1 =
FACW species x 2 =
FAC species x 3 =
FACU species x 4 =
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals: (A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
L_I 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
3 - Prevalence Index is 53.0'
L_I Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree — Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
larger in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub — Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft. (1 m) tall.
Herb —All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody vine — All woody vines, greater than 3.28 ft. in
height.
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region —Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Absolute Dominant
Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft radius )
% Cover Species?
Status
1 Pinus tadea
90
Fac
2.
❑
3.
❑
4.
❑
5.
❑
6.
❑
7.
❑
8.
F-1
90 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 45
20% of total cover: 18
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft radius )
1. Liquidambar styraciflua
15
Fac
2.
❑
3.
❑
4.
❑
5.
❑
6.
❑
7.
❑
8.
F-1
15 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 7.5
20% of total cover 3
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft raadius )
1.
❑
2.
❑
3.
❑
4.
❑
5.
❑
6.
❑
7.
❑
8.
❑
9.
❑
10.
❑
11.
❑
12.
❑
100 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 50
20% of total cover: 20
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
❑
2.
❑
3.
❑
4.
❑
5.
❑
= Total Cover
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present?
Sampling Point:
Yes M No
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region -Version 2.0

Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below).
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region —Version 2.0

501L
Sampling Point:
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix
Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) %
Color (moist) % Type' Loc2
Texture Remarks
0-7 10YR 6/2 100
sl
7-15 5YR 5/6 100
scl
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
El Histosol (Al)
❑ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U)
II 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
❑ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
Il 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
Ej Black Histic (A3)
❑ Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
Stratified Layers (A5)
❑ Depleted Matrix (F3)
Il Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 15313)
El Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
❑ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
II Red Parent Material (TF2)
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
❑ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
II Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
❑ Redox Depressions (F8)
II Other (Explain in Remarks)
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
❑ Marl (F10) (LRR U)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (All 1)
❑ Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
❑ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T)
'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A) ❑ Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
must be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
El Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S)
❑ Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
❑ Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 150B)
EJ Sandy Redox (S5)
❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
El Stripped Matrix (S6)
❑ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region —Version 2.0