NC0086550_NPDES Permit Renewal App_20090205

Beverly Eaves Perdue
Governor
BLAKE PROCTOR
TOWN MANAG
TOWN OF
PO BOX 24
FAIRMONT NC 28340
Dear Mr. Proctor:
ATA
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Coleen H. Sullins Dee Freeman
Director Secretary
February 5, 2009 I-F,
,3'11)
B LID �;�'
DWG)
Subject: Receipt of permit renewal application
NPDES Permit NC0086550
Fairmont Regional WWTP
Robeson County
The NPDES Unit acknowledges receipt of the permit renewal application for the above facility on February
2, 2009; however, on initial review it was noted that the required Sludge Management Plan was not included in the
submitted paperwork. Please submit to this unit a Sludge Management Plan. For your convenience, we can accept
a faxed copy at [phone] or you can mail it attention to me at the mail service center address listed below.
Upon receipt, a member of the NPDES Unit will further review your application.and will contact you if additional
information is required.
If you have any additional questions concerning renewal of the subject permit, please contact Ron Berry at
[phone].
Sincerely,
Dina Sprinkle
Point Source Branch
cc: CENTRAL FILES
Fayetteville-Regiona L-Office/Surface Water Protection
NPDES Unit
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
Location: 512 N. Salisbury St Raleigh, North Carolina 27604 •
Phone: [phone] FAX: [phone] Customer Service: 1-877-623-6748
Internet: www.ncwaterquality.org
An Equal Opportunity 1 Affirmative Action Employer
NorthCarolina
Naturally

Hobbs, Upchurch & Associates, P.A.
Consulting Engineers
300 S.W. Broad Street • Post Office Box 1737 • Southern Pines, NC 28388
February 25, 2009
Mr. Dale Lopez
NCDENR -- DWQ
Fayetteville Regional Office
225 Green Street, Suite 714
Fayetteville, NC 28301
RE: Town of Fairmont Regional WWTP
NPDES No. NC0086550
Additional Information
Dear Mr. Lopez:
FEB 2 6 2009 !;
DENR — FAYETTEVILLE REGIONAL OFFICE
Please find enclosed a copy of the information requested during our telephone conversation.
Following is a summary of the information provided:
• WWTP Layout Map
• Biosolids Management Service Agreement
• Water Pollution Control Designation Form
Please note that the flow through the facility is split equally between the treatment trains. If you
have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact this office.
Sincerely,
HOBBS, UPCHI_?RCH & ASSOCIATES, P.A.
Bill Lester, Jr., P.
Enclosures
. Southern Pines, NC • Telephone [phone] • Fax [phone] • e-mail: [e-mail]
Myrtle Beach • Nags Head • Charlotte • Beaufort

FEB - 2 2009
DENR - WATER QUALITY
POINT SOURCE BRANCH
NPDES Permit #NC0086550
Renewal Application
Town of Fairmont
Robeson County
PREPARED FOR
TOWN OF FAIRMONT
J
PREPARED BY
Hobbs, Upchurch & Associates, P.A.
300 S.W. Broad Street
Southern Pines, NC 28387
January 2009

NPDES Permit Renewal Application
(NC0086550)
Town of Fairmont Wastewater Treatment Plant
Serving
Town of Fairmont, North Carolina
January 2009
Table of Contents
NPDES Form 2A
Part A Basic Application Information
Part B Additional Application Information (greater than 100,000 gpd)
Part C Certification
Part D Expanded Effluent Testing Data
Part E Toxicity Test Data
Part F Industrial User Discharges and RCRA/CERCLA (Not Applicable)
Part G Combined Sewer Systems (Not Applicable)
Attachments
Attachment 1 DMR Data Summary (December 2005 through November 2008)
Attachment 2 Expanded Effluent Testing - Priority Pollutant Analyses
Attachment 3 Toxicity Test Results
Attachment 4 Map of River Outfall
Attachment 5 Treatment Plant Location Map & Process Layout
Attachment 6 Current NPDES Permit

NPDES Form 2A
1

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
Town of Fairmont WWTP, NC0086550
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Renewal
RIVER BASIN:
Lumber
FORM
2A
NPDES
APPLICATION OVERVIEW
Form 2A has•been.developed•in a modularformat and consists of a "Basic Application Information" packet
and a "Supplemental Application Information" packet. The Basic Application Information packet is divided
into two parts. All applicants must complete Parts A:and. C. Applicants with a design flow greater than or
equal to 0.1 mgd must also complete Part B. Some applicants must also complete the Supplemental
Application Information packet. The following items explain which parts of Form 2A youmust complete.
BASIC APPLICATION INFORMATION:
A. Basic Application Information for all Applicants. All applicants must complete questions A.1 through A.8. A treatment works
that discharges effluent to surface waters of the United States must also answer questions A.9 through A.12.
B. Additional Application Information for Applicants with a Design Flow a 0.1 mgd. All treatment works that have design flows
greater than or equal to 0.1 million gallons per day must complete questions B.1 through B.6.
C. Certification. All applicants must complete Part C (Certification).
SUPPLEMENTAL APPLICATION INFORMATION:
D. Expanded Effluent Testing Data. A treatment works that discharges effluent to surface waters of the United States and meets
one or more of the following criteria must complete Part D (Expanded Effluent Testing Data):
1. Has a design flow rate greater than or equal to 1 mgd,
2. Is required to have a pretreatment program (or has one in place), or
3. Is otherwise required by the permitting authority to provide the information.
E. Toxicity Testing Data. A treatment works that meets one or more of the following criteria must complete Part E (Toxicity Testing
Data):
1. Has a design flow rate greater than or equal to 1 mgd,
2. Is required to have a pretreatment program (or has one in place), or
3. Is otherwise required by the permitting authority to submit results of toxicity testing.
F. Industrial User Discharges and RCRA/CERCLA Wastes. A treatment works that accepts process wastewater from any
significant industrial users (SlUs) or receives RCRA or CERCLA wastes must complete Part F (Industrial User Discharges
and RCRA/CERCLA Wastes). SlUs are defined as:
1. All industrial users subject to Categorical Pretreatment Standards under 40 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) 403.6 and
40 CFR Chapter I, Subchapter N (see instructions); and
2. Any other industrial user that:
a. Discharges an average of 25,000 gallons per day or more of process wastewater to the treatment works (with certain
exclusions); or
b. Contributes a process wastestream that makes up 5 percent or more of the average dry weather hydraulic or organic
capacity of the treatment plant; or
c. Is designated as an SIU by the control authority.
G. Combined Sewer Systems. A treatment works that has a combined sewer system must complete Part G (Combined Sewer
Systems).
ALL APPLICANTS MUST COMPLETE PART C (CERTIFICATION)
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22.
Page 1 of 22

Part A
Basic Application Information

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
Town of Fairmont WWTP, NC0086550
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Renewal
RIVER BASIN:
Lumber
BASIC APPLICATION INFORMATION;;
PART A. BASIC APPLICATION INFORMATION FOR ALL APPLICANTS
All treatment works must complete questions A.1 through A.8 of this Basic Application Information Packet.
A.1. Facility Information.
Facility Name Town of Fairmont
Mailing Address Post Office Box 248
Fairmont, NC 28340
sue.
Contact Person Johnny Britt
„,, w N. ee.e,
Title Wastewater Superintendent, ORC r C Cl — 9 9(1nq
Telephone Number L910) 628-0064 ,
Facility Address S.R. 2312 near the Town of Boardman E F N R - WATER QUALITY
(not P.O. Box) pr NT SOURCE BRANCH
A.2. Applicant Information. If the applicant is different from the above, provide the following:
Applicant Name Blake Proctor, Town Manager
Mailing Address Post Office Box 248
Fairmont, NC 28340
Contact Person Johnny Britt
Title Wastewater Superintendent and ORC
Telephone Number [phone]
Is the applicant the owner or operator (or both) of the treatment works?
® owner ® operator
Indicate whether correspondence regarding this permit should be directed
❑ facility ® applicant
A.3. Existing Environmental Permits. Provide the permit number of any
(include state -issued permits).
NPDES NC0086550
to the facility or the
existing environmental
PSD
Other
Other
and areas served by
(combined vs. separate)
Type of Collection
Separate - Gravity
applicant.
permits that have been issued to the treatment works
UIC
RCRA
A.4. Collection System Information. Provide information on municipalities
entity and, if known, provide information on the type of collection system
Name Population Served
Town of Fairmont 2,855
the facility. Provide the name and population of each
and its ownership (municipal, private, etc.).
System Ownership
Municipal
Proctorville/Orrum Middle School 572 Separate - Gravity County
Town of Boardman 208 Separate - Gravity Municipal
Town of Cerro Gordo (planned) 218 Separate - Gravity Municipal
Town of Fair Bluff (planned) 1,217 Separate - Gravity Municipal
Total population served 5,070
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22.
Page 2 of 22

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
Town of Fairmont WWTP, NC0086550
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Renewal
RIVER BASIN:
Lumber
A.5. Indian Country.
a. Is the treatment works located in Indian Country?
❑ Yes ® No
b. Does the treatment works discharge to a receiving water that is either in Indian Country or that is upstream from (and eventually flows
through) Indian Country?
❑ Yes ® No
A.6. Flow. Indicate the design flow rate of the treatment plant (Le., the wastewater flow rate that the plant was built to handle). Also provide the
average daily flow rate and maximum daily flow rate for each of the last three years. Each year's data must be based on a 12-month time period
with the 12th month of "this year" occurring no more than three months prior to this application submittal.
a. Design flow rate 1.75 mgd
Two Years Ago Last Year This Year
b. Annual average daily flow rate 0.455 0.411 0.495
c. Maximum daily flow rate 1.840 1.589 1.489
A.7. Collection System. Indicate the type(s) of collection system(s) used by the treatment plant. Check all that apply. Also estimate the percent
contribution (by miles) of each.
® Separate sanitary sewer 100
❑ Combined storm and sanitary sewer
A.S. Discharges and Other Disposal Methods.
a. Does the treatment works discharge effluent to waters of the U.S.? ® Yes ❑ No
If yes, list how many of each of the following types of discharge points the treatment works uses:
i. Discharges of treated effluent 1
ii. Discharges of untreated or partially treated effluent 0
iii. Combined sewer overflow points 0
iv. Constructed emergency overflows (prior to the headworks) 0
v. Other NIA 0
b. Does the treatment works discharge effluent to basins, ponds, or other surface impoundments
that do not have outlets for discharge to waters of the U.S.? 0 Yes
If yes, provide the following for each surface impoundment:
Location: N/A
® No
Annual average daily volume discharge to surface impoundment(s) N/A mgd
Is discharge 0 continuous or 0 intermittent?
c. Does the treatment works land -apply treated wastewater? ❑ Yes ® No
If yes, provide the following for each land application site:
Location:
Number of acres:
Annual average daily volume applied to site:
Is land application
mgd
0 continuous or ❑ intermittent?
d. Does the treatment works discharge or transport treated or untreated wastewater to another
treatment works?
❑ Yes ® No
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22.
Page 3 of 22

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
Town of Fairmont WWTP, NC0086550
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Renewal
RIVER BASIN:
Lumber
e.
If yes, describe the mean(s) by which the wastewater from the treatment works is discharged or transported to the other treatment works
(e.g., tank truck, pipe).
N/A
If transport is by a party other than the applicant, provide:
Transporter Name N/A
Mailing Address
Contact Person
Title
Telephone Number ( )
For each treatment works that receives this discharge, provide the
following:
Name N/A
Mailing Address
Contact Person
Title
Telephone Number ( )
If known, provide the NPDES permit number of the treatment works
Provide the average daily flow rate from the treatment works into
Does the treatment works discharge or dispose of its wastewater
in A.S. through A.8.d above (e.g., underground percolation, well
If yes, provide the following for each disposal method:
that receives this discharge N/A
the receiving facility. N/A mgd
in a manner not included
injection): ❑ Yes ® No
Description of method (including location and size of site(s) if applicable):
N/A
Annual daily volume disposed by this method: N/A
Is disposal through this method ❑ continuous or ❑ intermittent?
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22.
Page 4 of 22

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
Town of Fairmont WWTP, NC0086550
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Renewal
RIVER BASIN:
Lumber
WASTEWATER DISCHARGES:
If you answered "Yes" to question A.8.a, complete questions A.9 through A.12 once for each outfall (including bypass points) through
which effluent is discharged. Do not include information on combined sewer overflows in this section. If you answered "No" to question
A.8.a, go to Part B, "Additional Application Information for Applicants with a Design Flow Greater than or Equal to 0.1 mgd.".
A.9. Description of Outfall.
a. Outfall number 001
b. Location Near the Town of Boardman on Lumber River at US Highway 74
(City or town, if applicable)
Robeson
(Zip Code)
North Carolina
(County) (State)
34° 26' 33" 78° 57' 37"
(Latitude) (Longitude)
c. Distance from shore (if applicable) 10 ft.
d. Depth below surface (if applicable) 3 ft.
e. Average daily flow rate 0.454 mgd
f. Does this outfall have either an intermittent or a periodic discharge? ❑ Yes ® No (go to A.9.g.)
If yes, provide the following information:
Number f times per year discharge occurs:
Average duration of each discharge:
Average flow per discharge: mgd
Months in which discharge occurs:
g. Is outfall equipped with a diffuser? ❑ Yes ® No
A.10. Description of Receiving Waters.
a. Name of receiving water
b. Name of watershed (if known)
United States Soil Conservation Service 14-digit watershed code (if known):
c. Name of State Management/River Basin (if known):
United States Geological Survey 8-digit hydrologic cataloging unit code (if known):
d. Critical low flow of receiving stream (if applicable)
acute cfs chronic cfs
e. Total hardness of receiving stream at critical low flow (if applicable): mg/I of CaCO3
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22.
Page 5 of 22

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
Town of Fairmont WWTP, NC0086550
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Renewal
RIVER BASIN:
Lumber
A.11. Description of Treatment
a. What level of treatment are provided? Check all that apply.
® Primary ® Secondary
❑ Advanced ❑ Other. Describe:
b. Indicate the following removal rates (as applicable):
Design BOD5 removal or Design CBOD5 removal
Design SS removal
Design P removal
Design N removal
Other
92.5
85
N/A
86.7
c. What type of disinfection is used for the effluent from this outfall? If disinfection varies by season, please describe:
Year Round Chlorination
Ok
Ok
%
Ok
If disinfection is by chlorination is dechlorination used for this outfall?
Does the treatment plant have post aeration?
® Yes
® Yes
❑ No
❑ No
A.12. Effluent Testing Information. All Applicants that discharge to waters of the US must provide effluent testing data for the following
parameters. Provide the indicated effluent testing required by the permitting authority for each outfall through which effluent is
discharged. Do not include information on combined sewer overflows in this section. All information reported must be based on data
collected through analysis conducted using 40 CFR Part 136 methods. In addition, this data must comply with QA/QC requirements of
40 CFR Part 136 and other appropriate QA/QC requirements for standard methods for analytes not addressed by 40 CFR Part 136. At a
minimum, effluent testing data must be based on at least three samples and must be no more than four and one-half years apart.
Outfall number: 001
PARAMETER
pH (Minimum)
pH (Maximum)
MAXIMUM DAILY VALUE
AVERAGE DAILY VALUE
Value - ` .Units
6.5
7.1
S.U.
S.U.
Value
Units
Number of Samples
Flow Rate
1.84 MGD
0.454
MGD
36 months
Temperature (Winter)
21.4 °C
14.9
°C
15 months
Temperature (Summer)
30.2 °C
23.4
°C
21 months
For pH please report a minimum and a maximum daily value
MAXIMUM" DAILY
DISCHARGE _ •
AVERAGE DAILY DISCHARGE
Conc...
Units
Conc.
Units
Number of -
Samples
ANALYTICAL
METHOD.
MUMDL
CONVENTIONAL AND NON CONVENTIONAL COMPOUNDS
BIOCHEMICAL OXYGEN
DEMAND (Report one)
BOD5
CBOD5
30.0
mg/I
2.51
mg/l
78
0405
15 mg/I
FECAL COLIFORM
920.0
#1100 ml
4.31
#l100m
78
9222
200/100m 1
TOTAL SUSPENDED SOLIDS (TSS)
31
m g/I
4.34
m g!I
END OFPART' A
REFER TO THE APPLICATION. OVERVIEW (PAGE.1) TO DETERMINE WHICH OTHER PARTS::
OF FORM 2A YOU'MUST COMPLETE
78
0160
30 mg/1
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22.
Page 6 of 22

Part B
Additional Application Information

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
Town of Fairmont WWTP, NC0086550
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Renewal
RIVER BASIN:
Lumber
BASIC APPLICATION INFORMATION
PART B. ADDITIONAL APPLICATION INFORMATION FOR APPLICANTS WITH A DESIGN FLOW GREATER THAN OR
EQUAL TO 0.1 MGD (100,000 gallons.per day)
All applicants with a design flow rate z 0.1 mgd must answer questions B.1 through B.6. All others go to Part C (Certification).
B.1. Inflow and Infiltration. Estimate the average number of gallons per day
55,000 gpd
that flow into the treatment works from inflow and/or infiltration.
Briefly explain any steps underway or planned to minimize inflow and infiltration.
B.2. Topographic Map. Attach to this application a topographic map of the area extending at least one mile beyond facility property boundaries. This
map must show the outline of the facility and the following information. (You may submit more than one map if one map does not show the entire
area.)
a. The area surrounding the treatment plant, including all unit processes.
b. The major pipes or other structures through which wastewater enters the treatment works and the pipes or other structures through which
treated wastewater is discharged from the treatment plant. Include outfalls from bypass piping, if applicable.
c. Each well where wastewater from the treatment plant is injected underground.
d. Wells; springs, other surface water bodies, and drinking water wells that are: 1) within A mile of the property boundaries of the treatment
works, and 2) listed in public record or otherwise known to the applicant.
e. Any areas where the sewage sludge produced by the treatment works is stored, treated, or disposed.
f. If the treatment works receives waste that is classified as hazardous under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) by truck, rail,
or special pipe, show on the map where the hazardous waste enters the treatment works and where it is treated, stored, and/or disposed.
B.3. Process Flow Diagram or Schematic. Provide a diagram showing the processes of the treatment plant, including all bypass piping and all
backup power sources or redunancy in the system. Also provide a water balance showing all treatment units, including disinfection (e.g.,
chlorination and dechlorination). The water balance must show daily average flow rates at influent and discharge points and approximate daily flow
rates between treatment units. Include a brief narrative description of the diagram.
B.4. Operation/Maintenance Performed by Contractor(s).
Are any operational or maintenance aspects (related to wastewater treatment and effluent quality) of the treatment works the responsibility of a
contractor? ❑ Yes ® No
If yes, list the name, address, telephone number, and status of each contractor and describe the contractor's responsibilities (attach additional
pages if necessary).
Name:
Mailing Address:
Telephone Number: ( )
Responsibilities of Contractor:
B.5. ' Scheduled improvements and Schedules of Implementation. Provide information on any uncompleted implementation schedule or
uncompleted plans for improvements that will affect the wastewater treatment, effluent quality, or design capacity of the treatment works. If the
treatment works has several different implementation schedules or is planning several improvements, submit separate responses to question B.5
for each. (If none, go to question B.6.)
a. List the outfall number (assigned in question A.9) for each outfall that is covered by this implementation schedule.
N/A
b. Indicate whether the planned improvements or implementation schedule are required by local, State, or Federal agencies.
❑ Yes ® No
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22.
Page 7 of 22

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
Town of Fairmont WWTP, NC0086550
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Renewal
RIVER BASIN:
Lumber
c. If the answer to B.5.b is "Yes," briefly describe, including new maximum daily inflow rate (if applicable).
d. Provide dates imposed
applicable. For improvements
applicable. Indicate
Implementation Stage
- Begin Construction
- End Construction
- Begin Discharge
- Attain Operational
e. Have appropriate
Describe briefly:
by any compliance schedule
planned independently
dates as accurately as possible.
Level
permits/clearances concerning other
or any actual dates of completion for the implementation steps listed
of local, State, or Federal agencies, indicate planned or actual completion
Schedule Actual Completion
MM/DD/YYYY MM/DD/YYYY
below, as
dates, as
Yes ❑ No
/ / / /
/ / / /
/ / / /
/ / / /
Federal/State requirements been obtained? ❑
B.6. EFFLUENT TESTING DATA (GREATER THAN 0.1 MGD
Applicants that discharge to waters of the US must
effluent testing required by the permitting authority
on combine sewer overflows in this section. All information
using 40 CFR Part 136 methods. In addition, this data
QA/QC requirements for standard methods for analytes
based on at least three pollutant scans and must be
Outfall Number: 001
ONLY).
provide effluent testing data for the following parameters. Provide
for each ouffall through which effluent is discharged. Do not include
the indicated
information
conducted
other appropriate
data must be
reported must be based on data collected through analysis
must comply with QAIQC requirements of 40 CFR Part 136 and
not addressed by 40 CFR Part 136. At a minimum effluent testing
no more than four and on -half years old.
POLLUTANT -
MAXIMUM DAILY
DISCHARGE
AVERAGE DAILY DISCHARGE
ANALYTICAL
METHOD
- ML/MDL
Conc.
Units
Conc.
Units
Number of
Samples
CONVENTIONAL AND NON CONVENTIONAL COMPOUNDS
AMMONIA (as N)
11.0
mg/I
1.00
mg/I
78
0330
4
CHLORINE (TOTAL
RESIDUAL, TRC)
0.0
mg/l
0.00
mg/l
156
0360
28
DISSOLVED OXYGEN
10.3
mg/I
8.80
mg/I
36
0351
5
TOTAL KJELDAHL
NITROGEN (TKN)
15.3
mg/I
4.37
mg/I
6
. monitor
NITRATE PLUS NITRITE
NITROGEN
OIL and GREASE
PHOSPHORUS (Total)
4.0
mg/I
1.79
mgll
6
0356
monitor
TOTAL DISSOLVED SOLIDS
(TDS)
OTHER
END OF PART B
REFER TO THE APPLICATION OVERVIEW (PAGE 1) TO DETERMINE WHICH OTHER PARTS
OF FORM 2A YOU. MUST COMPLETE
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22.
Page 8 of 22

Part D
Expanded Effluent Testing Data

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
Town of Fairmont WWTP, NC0086550
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Renewal
RIVER BASIN:
Lumber
SUPPLEMENTAL APPLICATION INFORMATION
PART D. - EXPANDED EFFLUENT TESTING DATA "
Refer to the directions on the cover page to determine whether this section applies to the treatment works.
Effluent Testing: 1.0 mgd and Pretreatment Works. If the treatment works has a design flow greater than or equal to 1.0 mgd or it has (or is required
to have) a pretreatment program, or is otherwise required by the permitting authority to provide the data, then provide effluent testing data for the following
pollutants. Provide the indicated effluent testing information and any other information required by the permitting authority for each outfall through which
effluent is discharged. Do not include information on combined sewer overflows in this section. All information reported must be based on data collected
through analyses conducted using 40 CFR Part 136 methods. In addition, these data must comply with QA/QC requirements of 40 CFR Part 136 and
other appropriate QA/QC requirements for standard methods for analytes not addressed by 40 CFR Part 136. Indicate in the blank rows provided below
any data you may have on pollutants not specifically listed in this form. At a minimum, effluent testing data must be based on at least three pollutant
scans and must be no more than four and one-half years old.
Outfall number: See Attachment 2 (Complete once for each outfall discharging effluent to waters of the United States.)
POLLUTANT
•
;MAXIMUMDAILY DISCHARGE'
AVERAGE DAILY DISCHARGE
'
ANALYTICAL
METHOD
MUMDL
Conc.
` Units, :
Mass ..:
Units..
Conc.
•;Units
Mass
Units
Number
of
Samples
METALS (TOTAL RECOVERABLE), CYANIDE,
PHENOLS,
AND HARDNESS.
ANTIMONY
ARSENIC
BERYLLIUM
CADMIUM
CHROMIUM
COPPER
LEAD
MERCURY
NICKEL
SELENIUM
SILVER
-
THALLIUM
ZINC
CYANIDE
TOTAL PHENOLIC
COMPOUNDS
HARDNESS (as CaCO3)
Use this space (or a separate sheet) to provide information on other metals reques ed by the permit writer
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22.
Page 10 of 22

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
Town of Fairmont WWTP, NC0086550
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Renewal
RIVER BASIN:
Lumber
Outfall number: (Complete once for each outfall discharging effluent to waters of the United States.)
POLLUTANT
•MAXIMUM DAILY DISCHARGE
AVERAGE DAILY DISCHARGE
ANALYTICAL
METHOD
ML/MDL
Conc.
,
' Units
Mass
Units ,
Conc -
Units
Mass
Units
Number
of
Samples
VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS
ACROLEIN
ACRYLONITRILE
BENZENE
BROMOFORM
CARBON
TETRACHLORIDE
•
CHLOROBENZENE
CHLORODIBROMO-
METHANE
CHLOROETHANE
2-CHLOROETHYLVINYL
ETHER
CHLOROFORM
DICHLOROBROMO-
METHANE
1,1-DICHLOROETHANE
1,2-DICHLOROETHANE
TRANS-1,2-DICHLORO-
ETHYLENE
•
1,1-DICHLORO-
ETHYLENE
1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE
1,3-DICHLORO-
PROPYLENE
ETHYLBENZENE
METHYL BROMIDE
METHYL CHLORIDE
METHYLENE CHLORIDE
1,1,2,2-TETRA-
CHLOROETHANE
TETRACHLORO-
ETHYLENE
TOLUENE
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22.
Page 11 of 22

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
Town of Fairmont WWTP, NC0086550
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Renewal
RIVER BASIN:
Lumber
Outfall number: (Complete once for each outfall discharging effluent to waters of the United States.)
POLLUTANT
MAXIMUM -DAILY' DISCHARGE
AVERAGE DAILY DISCHARGE `
ANALYTICAL
METHOD
MUMDL
Conc.
-Units ,
Mass
Units
.Conc.
,Units
Mass
Units
Number
• ; of
Samples
1,1,1-
TRICHLOROETHANE
1,1,2-
TRICHLOROETHANE
TRICHLOROETHYLENE
VINYL CHLORIDE
Use this space (or a separate sheet) to provide information on other volatile organic compounds requested by the permit writer
ACID -EXTRACTABLE COMPOUNDS
P-CHLORO-M-CRESOL
2-CHLOROPHENOL
2,4-DICHLOROPHENOL
2,4-DIMETHYLPHENOL
4, 6-D I N ITRO-O-C R E SO L
2,4-DINITROPHENOL
2-NITROPHENOL
4-NITROPHENOL
PENTACHLOROPHENOL
PHENOL
2,4,6-
TRICHLOROPHENOL
Use this space (or a separate sheet) to provide information on other acid-extractab e compounds reques ed by the permit writer
BASE -NEUTRAL COMPOUNDS
ACENAPHTHENE
ACENAPHTHYLENE
ANTHRACENE
BENZIDINE
BENZO(A)ANTHRACENE
BENZO(A)PYRENE
'
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22.
Page 12 of 22

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
Town of Fairmont WWTP, NC0086550
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Renewal
RIVER BASIN:
Lumber
Outfall number: (Complete once for each outfall discharging effluent to waters of the United States.)
MAXIMUM DAILY DISCHARGE
AVERAGE DAILY
DISCHARGE
ANALYTICAL
METHOD
ML/MDL
Conc.
:-:Units
Mass
Units
'Conc.
Units
Mass"'
Units
Nu er
Number
of
Samples
3,4 BENZO-
FLUORANTHENE
BENZO(GHI)PERYLENE
BENZO(K)
FLUORANTHENE
BIS (2-CHLOROETHOXY)
METHANE
BIS (2-CHLOROETHYL)-
ETHER
BIS (2-CHLOROISO-
PROPYL)ETHER
-
BIS (2-ETHYLHEXYL)
PHTHALATE
4-BROMOPHENYL
PHENYL ETHER
BUTYL BENZYL
PHTHALATE
2-CHLORO-
NAPHTHALENE
4-CHLORPHENYL
PHENYL ETHER
CHRYSENE
DI-N-BUTYL PHTHALATE
DI-N-OCTYL PHTHALATE
DIBENZO(A,H)
ANTHRACENE
1,2-DICHLOROBENZENE
1,3-DICHLOROBENZENE
1,4-DICHLOROBENZENE
3,3-DICHLORO-
BENZIDINE
DIETHYL PHTHALATE
DIMETHYL PHTHALATE
2,4-DINITROTOLUENE
2,6-DINITROTOLUENE
1,2-DIPHENYL-
HYDRAZINE
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22.
Page 13 of 22

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
Town of Fairmont WWTP, NC0086550
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Renewal
RIVER BASIN:
Lumber
Outfall number: (Complete once for each outfall discharging effluent to waters of the United States.)
POLLUTANT
MAXIMUM DAILY DISCHARGE AVERAGE DAILY DISCHARGE
Conc.
Units
Mass .
Units Conc. ' Units
Mass Units
Number ANALYTICAL
of METHOD
Samples
ML/MDL
FLUORANTHENE
FLUORENE
HEXACHLOROBENZENE
HEXACHLORO-
BUTADIENE
HEXACHLOROCYCLO-
PENTADIENE
HEXACHLOROETHANE
INDENO(1,2,3-CD)
PYRENE
ISOPHORONE
NAPHTHALENE
NITROBENZENE
N-NITROSODI-N-
PROPYLAMINE
N-NITROSODI-
METHYLAMINE
N-NITROSODI-
PHENYLAMINE
PHENANTHRENE
PYRENE
1,2,4-
TRICHLOROBENZENE
Use this space (or a separate sheet) to provide information on other base -neutral compounds requested by the permit writer
Use this space (or a separate sheet) to provide information on other pollutants (e.g , pesticides) requested by the permit writer
END OF PART D.
TO THE APPLICATION OVERVIEW (PAGE 1) TO DETERMINE WHICH OTHER PARTS
OF FORM 2A YOU, MUST COMPLETE
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22.
Page 14 of 22

fl
Part F
Industrial User Discharges
and RCRA/CERCLA Wastes
(Not Applicable)

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
Town of Fairmont WWTP, NC0086550
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Renewal
RIVER BASIN:
Lumber
SUPPLEMENTAL APPLICATION, INFORMATION
PART F.INDUSTRIAL USER DISCHARGES AND RCRAICERCLA WASTES'
All treatment works receiving discharges from significant industrial users
complete part F.
GENERAL INFORMATION:
or which receive RCRA,CERCLA,
ot, an approved pretreatment program?
Users (ClUs). Provide the number
or other remedial wastes must
of each of the following types of
questions F.3 through F.8 and
F.1. Pretreatment program. Does the treatment works have, or is subject
❑ Yes ® No
F.2. Number of Significant Industrial Users (SlUs) and Categorical Industrial
industrial users that discharge to the treatment works.
a. Number of non -categorical Sills. 0
b. Number of CIUs. 0
SIGNIFICANT INDUSTRIAL USER INFORMATION:
to the treatment works, copy
Supply the following information for each SIU. If more than one SIU discharges
provide the information requested for each SIU.
F.3. Significant Industrial User Information. Provide the name and address of each SIU discharging to the treatment works. Submit additional pages
as necessary.
Name:
Mailing Address:
F.4. Industrial Processes. Describe all the industrial processes that affect or contribute to the SIU's discharge.
F.5. Principal Product(s) and Raw Material(s). Describe all of the principal processes and raw materials that affect or contribute to the SIU's
discharge.
Principal product(s):
Raw material(s):
F.6. Flow Rate.
a. Process wastewater flow rate. Indicate the average daily volume of process wastewater discharge into
day (gpd) and whether the discharge is continuous or intermittent.
gpd ( continuous or intermittent)
the collection system in gallons per
into the collection system
.
b. Non -process wastewater flow rate. Indicate the average daily volume of non -process wastewater flow discharged
in gallons per day (gpd) and whether the discharge is continuous or intermittent.
gpd ( continuous or intermittent)
F.7. Pretreatment Standards. Indicate whether the SIU is subject to the following:
a. Local limits ❑ Yes 0 No
b. Categorical pretreatment standards ❑ Yes 0 No
If subject to categorical pretreatment standards, which category and subcategory?
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22.
Page 18 of 22

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
Town of Fairmont WWTP, NC0086550
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Renewal
RIVER BASIN:
Lumber
F.8. Problems at the Treatment Works Attributed to Waste Discharge by the SIU. Has the SIU caused or contributed to any problems (e.g.,
upsets, interference) at the treatment works in the past three years?
❑ Yes EI No
If yes, describe each episode.
RCRA HAZARDOUS WASTE RECEIVED BY TRUCK, RAIL, OR DEDICATED PIPELINE:
F.9. RCRA Waste. Does the treatment works receive or has it in the past three years received RCRA hazardous waste by truck, rail or dedicated pipe?
❑ Yes D No (go to F.12)
F.10. Waste transport. Method by which RCRA waste is received (check all that apply):
❑ Truck
0 Rail 0 Dedicated Pipe
F.11. Waste Description. Give EPA hazardous waste number and amount (volume or mass, specify units).
EPA Hazardous Waste Number Amount
Units
CERCLA (SUPERFUND) WASTEWATER, RCRA REMEDIATION/CORRECTIVE ACTION
WASTEWATER, AND OTHER REMEDIAL ACTIVITY WASTEWATER:
F.12. Remediation Waste. Does the treatment works currently (or has it been notified that it will) receive waste from remedial activities? •
O Yes (complete F.13 through F.15.)
® No
F.13. Waste Origin. Describe the site and type of facility at which the CERCLA/RCRA/or other remedial waste originates (or is excepted to origniate in
the next five years).
F.14. Pollutants. List the hazardous constituents that are received (or are expected to be received). Include data on volume and concentration, if
known. (Attach additional sheets if necessary.)
F.15. Waste Treatment.
a. Is this waste treated (or will be treated) prior to entering the treatment works?
❑ Yes ❑ No
If yes, describe the treatment (provide information about the removal efficiency):
b. Is the discharge (or will the discharge be) continuous or intermittent?
❑ Continuous ❑ Intermittent If intermittent, describe discharge schedule.
END OF PART''
REFER TO THE APPLICATION OVE•RVIEW (PAGE 1)''TO DETERMINE WHICH
OF FORM 2A YOU :MUST COMPLETE ,
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22.
Page 19 of 22

Part G
Combined Sewer Systems
(Not Applicable)

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
Town of Fairmont WWTP, NC0086550
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Renewal
RIVER BASIN:
Lumber
•
SUPPLEMENTAL APPLICATION INFORMATION:.
PART G. COMBINED SEWER SYSTEMS,
If the treatment works has a combined sewer system, complete Part G.
G.1. System Map. Provide a map indicating the following: (may be included with Basic Application Information)
a. All CSO discharge points.
b. Sensitive use areas potentially affected by CSOs (e.g., beaches, drinking water supplies, shellfish beds, sensitive aquatic ecosystems, and
outstanding natural resource waters).
c. Waters that support threatened and endangered species potentially affected by CSOs.
G.2. System Diagram. Provide a diagram, either in the map provided in G.1 or on a separate drawing, of the combined sewer collection system that
includes the following information.
a. Location of major sewer trunk lines, both combined and separate sanitary.
b. Locations of points where separate sanitary sewers feed into the combined sewer system.
c. Locations of in -line and off-line storage structures.
d. Locations of flow -regulating devices.
e. Locations of pump stations.
CSO OUTFALLS:
Complete questions G.3 through G.6 once for each CSO discharge point.
G.3. Description of Outfall.
a. Outfall number
b. Location
(City or town, if applicable) (Zip Code)
(County) (State)
(Latitude) (Longitude)
c. Distance from shore (if applicable)
d. Depth below surface (if applicable)
e. Which of the following were monitored during the last year for this CSO?
❑ Rainfall
❑ CSO flow volume
ft.
ft.
❑ CSO pollutant concentrations ❑ CSO frequency
0 Receiving water quality
f. How many storm events were monitored during the last year?
G.4. CSO Events.
a. Give the number of CSO events in the last year.
events (0 actual or 0 approx.)
b. Give the average duration per CSO event.
hours (0 actual or ❑ approx.)
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22.
Page 20 of 22

1
FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
Town of Fairmont VVWTP, NC0086550
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Renewal
RIVER BASIN:
Lumber
c. Give the average volume per CSO event.
million gallons (❑ actual or ❑ approx.)
d. Give the minimum rainfall that caused a CSO event in the last year
Inches of rainfall
G.5. Description of Receiving Waters.
a. Name of receiving water:
b. Name of watershed/river/stream system:
United State Soil Conservation Service 14-digit watershed code (if known):
c. Name of State Management/River Basin:
United States Geological Survey 8-digit hydrologic cataloging unit code (if known):
G.6. CSO Operations.
Describe any known water quality impacts on the receiving water caused by this CSO (e.g., permanent or intermittent beach closings, permanent or
intermittent shell fish bed closings, fish kills, fish advisories, other recreational loss, or violation of any applicable State water quality standard).
..... ...... ...._......._.............._ ..... .
END OF PART G.
TO' THE APPLICATION OVERVIEW (PAGE 1) TO DETERMINE
OF FORM 2A YOU MUST COMPLETE.
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22. Page 21 of 22

Attachments

Attachment 1
DMR Data Summary
(December 2005 through November 2008)

-_J J _J _J
Town of Fairmont Wastewater Treatment Plant (NC0086550)
Robeson County, North Carolina
DMR Data Summary
Month
Flow (mgd)
Temperature °C
pH
Total Residual Chlorine
BOD5
Ammonia Nitrogen
Average.
' Max.''
Min. 'a
Average
Max.
Mina ,
° ' Max. -"
Min.
Average
`' Max.
' -Min.':
Average
"' Max.
,. Min.
Average `
Max.;
' Min.
December-05
0.685
0.994
0.514
15.5
18.6
13.7
6.9
6.6
<10
<10
<10
<2.0
<2.0
<2.0
0.5
1.4
0.1
January-06
0.691
1.075
0.565
14.8
16.1
13.7
6.8
6.6
0.00
<10
<10
0.94
5.4
<2.0
0.9
4.2
0.1
February-06
0.616
0.875
0.477
13.3
14.7
11.9
7.1
6.7
0.00
<10
<10
0.39
2.5
<2.0
0.4
0.8
0.1
March-06
0.507
0.761
0.357
15.2
17.6
13.9
7.0
6.8
0.00
<10
<10
1.45
3.4
<2.0
0.6
1.0
0.2
April-06
0.317
0.409
0.233
19.0
21.6
16.9
7.1
7.0
0.00
<10
<10
3.28
6.3
<2.0
0.9
2.0
0.2
May-06
0.315
0.516
0.226
21.10
24.20
19.10
7.0
6.8
0.00
<10
<10
3.07
5.9
<2.0
1.4
2.0
0.5
June-06
0.387
0.842
0.220
24.90
26.40
23.40
7.0
6.8
0.00
<10
<10
4.08
6.9
2.3
1.8
3.8
1.2
July-06
0.334
0.614
0.223
27.60
29.10
26.0
7.0
6.9
0.00
<10
<10
5.9
18.0
2.4
3.2
8.5
0.1
August-06
0.315
0.441
0.249
18.60
29.40
0.00
7.0
6.8
0.00
<10
<10
6.0
11.4
2.9
2.4
3.8
1.1
September-06
0.379
0.758
0.234
26.0
28.0
24.70
7.0
6.9
0.00
<10
<10
2.2
3.5
<2.0
0.6
1.6
<0.1
October-06
0.242
0.376
0.196
22.0
24.4
18.2
7.0
7.0
0.00
<10
<10
2.90
6.9
<2.0
0.5
1.2
<0.1
November-06
0.672
1.840
0.216
18.6
20.5
16.9
7.0
6.6
0.00
<10
<10
1.20
5.1
<2.0
0.1
0.2
0.1
December-06
0.730
1.589
0.418
16.0
19.3
14.2
6.9
6.5
0.00
<10
<10
0.6
4.6
<2.0
0.2
0.4
0.1
January-07
0.786
1.164
0.604
13.9
17.8
0.00
6.9
6.5
0.00
<10
<10
0.40
3.0
<2.0
0.4
1.2
<0.1
February-07
0.679
1.125
0.435
12.2
13.1
11.1
6.9
6.6
0.00
<10
<10
2.90
30.0
<2.0
0.5
1.3
0.1
March-07
0.492
0.774
0.358
14.7
17.4
12.4
6.9
6.6
0.00
<10
<10
1.1
5.6
<2.0
3.9
11.0
1.5
April-07
0.418
0.776
0.291
16.7
49.7
14.4
6.9
6.9
0.00
<10
<10
3.0
7.5
<2.0
2.0
6.8
0.3
May-07
0.348
0.557
0.263
20.4
22.2
18.0
6.9
6.8
0.00
<10
<10
3.5
5.0
<2.0
2.3
6.8
0.7
June-07
0.297
0.534
0.236
24.5
26.9
22.2
6.9
6.9
0.00
<10
<10
5.7
8.4
3.5
3.1
5.0
2.6
July-07
0.244
0.314
0.194
26.5
27.6
24.8
7.0
6.9
0.00
<10
<10
4.90
7.1
3.1
2.7
5.1
1.0
August-07
0.269
0.564
0.212
28.8
30.2
27.2
6.9
6.8
0.00
<10
<10
5.00
7.8
2.8
1.0
3.8
0.3
September-07
0.247
0.304
0.212
25.1
28.1
24.2
6.9
6.9
0.00
<10
<10
3.0
3.8
2.1
0.2
0.2
0.1
October-07
0.222
0.312
0.163
24.1
26.0
20.3
6.9
6.8
0.00
<10
<10
1.0
3.8
<2.0
0.2
0.2
0.1
November-07
0.205
0.240
0.179
15.5
21.4
0.0
6.9
6.8
0.00
<10
<10
0.3
3.6
<2.0
0.2
0.2
0.1
December-07
0.266
0.422
0.204
14.1
18.1
0.0
6.8
6.7
0.00
<10
<10
1.2
4.0
<2.0
0.1
0.2
0.1
January-08
0.349
0.794
0.253
13.0
16.5
11.8
6.7
6.6
0.00
<10
<10
0.7
3.8
<2.0
0.1
0.2
<0.1
February-08
0.532
1.094
0.254
14.1
16.3
12.7
6.7
6.6
0.00
<10
<10
2.1
9.2
<2.0
0.9
5.0
0.1
March-08
0.677
0.955
0.470
14.8
16.7
14.5
6.7
6.6
0.00
<10
<10
0.9
4.2
<2.0
0.1
0.4
<0.1
April-08
0.721
1.489
0.464
18.3
20.3
16.5
6.7
6.5
0.00
<10
<10
1.2
5.2
<2.0
0.1
0.4
0.1
May-08
0.423
0.627
0.284
20.3
22.8
0.0
6.7
6.7
0.00
<10
<10
1.3
4.0
<2.0
0.3
0.3
0.1
June-08
0.264
0.408
0.211
25.8
27.0
23.6
6.7
6.7
0.00
<10
<10
2.3
5.2
<2.0
0.4
0.7
0.2
July-08
0.308
0.531
0.200
27.5
28.8
26.3
6.7
6.6
0.00
<10
<10
3.9
5.7
2.5
0.4
1.3
0.2
August-08
0.429
1.218
0.224
27.1
28.9
25.9
7.1
6.5
0.00
<10
<10
3.3
5.8
<2.0
1.1
5.3
0.2
September-08
0.913
1.448
0.380
24.4
27.0
0.0
6.6
6.5
0.00
<10
<10
1.7
4.7
<2.0
0.1
0.3
0.1
October-08
0.464
0.768
0.326
21.7
23.8
18.4
6.7
6.5
0.00
<10
<10
1.98
3.1
<2.0
0.1
0.2
0.1
November-08
0.591
1.394
0.286
17.6
19.2
15.3
6.7
6.5
0.00
<10
<10
4.5
5.9
2.6
0.50
1.3
I
0.1
0.454
1.84
0.163
19.825
30.2
0
7.1
6.5
0.00
0.00
0
_
2.51
30.0
2.1
1.0
11.0
0.1 \

1111
J_J
Town of Fairmont Wastewater Treatment Plant (NC0086550)
Robeson County, North Carolina
DMR Data Summary
Month
Fecal Conform
Dissovled Oxygen
Total Suspended Residue
Total Nitrogen(TKN)
Total Phosphorus
Average
,. Max.
IVRii. '
Average
' , Max
Mrn. '
Average
Max: '''
Min. '
Average
Max.
Min:
Average
', Max.
'''Min.
December-05
2.0
8.4
9.2
8.0
2.2
6.3
0.7
5.12
5.12
5.12
3.60
3.60
3.60
January-06
1.9
9.0
<1.0
8.0
8.2
7.9
2.5
7.0
0.9
3.45
3.45
3.45
0.301
0.301
0.301
February-06
3.0
18.0
<1.0
9.4
10.2
8.4
1.4
4.6
0.4
3.39
3.39
3.39
0.338
0.338
0.338
March-06
1.9
3.6
0.8
9.8
10.1
9.0
1.9
3.6
0.8
13.70
13.70
13.70
2.96
2.96
2.96
April-06
4.0
17.0
1.0
9.0
9.8
8.7
3.0
4.4
1.9
1.19
1.19
1.19
0.620
0.620
0.620
May-06
3.9
38.0
<1.0
9.0
9.2
8.6
3.6
5.6
1.3
2.36
2.36
2.36
0.718
0.718
0.718
June-06
4.6
28.0
1.0
8.7
9.1
8.1
4.6
10.5
2.2
7.27
7.27
7.27
2.00
2.00
2.00
July-06
3.6
8
<1
8.3
8.7
8.0
5.5
10.0
3.0
2.55
2.55
2.55
1.77
1.77
1.77
August-06
13.4
160
1.0
7.8
8.0
7.6
5.6
8.0
2.4
2.77
2.77
2.77
0.252
0.252
0.252
September-06
14.6
77
3.0
8.4
8.9
8.0
3.6
6.8
1.2
1.73
1.73
1.73
1.79
1.79
1.79
October-06
5.5
49
<1.0
9.1
10.0
8.8
4.7
27.0
0.4
2.74
2.74
2.74
3.430
3.430
3.430
November-06
3.6
120
1.0
9.0
9.4
8.7
6.6
17.0
1.5
4.51
4.51
4.51
1.550
1.550
1.550
December-06
5.3
51
<I
9.1
9.2
8.8
4.6
6.7
2.4
2.31
2.31
2.31
2.99
2.99
2.99
January-07
6.8
215
<1
8.9
9.1
8.7
2.9
8.0
0.7
2.39
2.39
2.39
1.24
1.24
1.24
February-07
2.0
9
<1
9.0
9.1
9.0
2.3
5.9
1.3
3.62
3.62
3.62
0.44
0.44
0.44
March-07
1.3
10
<1
8.9
9.3
8.4
3.9
10.2
0.4
2.38
2.38
2.38
0.785
0.785
0.785
April-07
1.3
9
<1
8.8
9.0
8.5
5.4
8.2
3.8
3.13
3.13
3.13
0.751
0.751
0.751
May-07
1.6
7
<1
8.8
9.0
8.5
5.0
7.5
3.2
1.50
1.50
1.50
1.390
1.390
1.390
June-07
2.1
6
<1
8.5
8.9
7.7
3.4
5.5
2.3
3.42
3.42
3.42
1.720
1.720
1.720
July-07
3.8
58
<1
7.9
8.7
7.5
3.7
8.0
2.0
6.19
6.19
6.19
2.510
2.510
2.510
August-07
8.0
92
<1
7.8
8.1
7.7
3.1
5.0
1.8
3.47
3.47
3.47
3.130
3.130
3.130
September-07
12.5
110
<1
8.1
8.7
7.8
3.4
4.9
2.5
5.47
5.47
5.47
1.480
1.480
1.480
October-07
8.8
280
<1
8.1
8.6
7.9
3.1
5.9
1.9
15.30
15.30
15.30
1.560
1.560
1.560
November-07
1.7
6
<1
8.9
9.2
8.2
2.8
6.3
1.2
1.75
1.75
1.75
2.270
2.270
2.270
December-07
2.7
8
<1
9.6
10.0
8.8
3.2
5.8
0.8
14.40
14.40
14.40
1.980
1.980
1.980
January-08
2.1
74
<1
9.8
10.3
9.0
3.7
5.5
2.3
8.23
8.23
8.23
2.550
2.550
2.550
February-08
1.4
3
<1
9.7
10.0
9.0
4.6
9.8
2.4
5.64
5.64
5.64
1.050
1.050
1.050
March-08
4.1
600
<1
9.5
10.0
8.9
1.8
2.8
1.3
3.34
3.34
3.34
0.821
0.821
0.821
April-08
1.8
>777
<1
9.8
9.9
9.7
3.4
13.2
1.6
5.59
5.59
5.59
0.848
0.848
0.848
May-08
1.4
12
<1
9.3
9.8
8.2
2.2
3.8
1.5
1.49
1.49
1.49
0.982
0.982
0.982
June-08
5.0
104
<1
8.2
8.5
8.0
2.3
3.1
1.5
1.23
1.23
1.23
3.210
3.210
3.210
July-08
11.7
920
<1
7.9
8.0
7.7
5.9
9.6
3.5
2.23
2.23
2.23
3.450
3.450
3.450
August-08
1.3
5
<1
7.9
8.3
7.7
9.1
18.0
3.8
1.40
1.40
1.40
3.990
3.990
3.990
September-08
1.9
103
<1
8.4
9.2
7.8
5.5
8.9
3.7
1.29
1.29
1.29
1.460
1.460
1.460
October-08
1.1
4
<1
9.6
9.9
9.2
7.9
13.1
3.4
4.64
4.64
4.64
1.770
1.770
1.770
November-08
3.3
600
<1
9.4
9.2
18.0
31.0
4.3
6.03
6.03
6.03
2.830
2.830
2.830
4.31
920.0
0.8
8.8
10.3
7.5
4.34
31
0.4
4.37
15.3
1.19
1.79
4.0
0.25

Attachment 2
Expanded Effluent Testing
Priority Pollutant Analyses

Permit No: NC0086550
Outfall: 001
Facility Name: Town of Fairmont
Analytical Laboratory:
Annual Monitoring and Pollutant Scan
Town of Fai mont
TB
Month: August
Year: 2007
ORC: Johnny Britt
Phone: [phone]
Sample
Analytical
Quantitation
Sample
Units of
Number of
Parameter
Type
Method
Level
Result
Measurement
Samples
Ammonia (as N)
Composite
SM4500-NH3F
0.1
1
mg/I -
1
Dissolved Oxygen
Grab
SM4500-OG
1.0
7.7
mg/I
1
Nitrate/Nitrite
Composite
EPA. 300.0
0.10
0.62
mg/I
1
Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen
Composite
EPA. 351.4
0.5
2.2
mg/I
1
Total Phosphorus
Composite
4500.PB.5
0.1
3.4
mg/I
1
Total Dissolved Solids
Composite
160.1
10.0
320
mg/I
1
Hardness
Composite
CALC.
30
38
mg/I
1
Chlorine (total residual,TRC)
Grab
SM 4500 CIG
10
<10
ugll
1
Oil and Grease
Grab
SM5520B
5.6
BDL
mg/I
1
Metals (total recoverable), cyanide and total phenols
Antinomy
Composite
200.7
0.020
BDL
mg/I
1
Arsenic
Composite
200.7
0.020
BDL
mg/I
1
Beryllium
Composite
200.7
0.0020
BDL
mg/I
1
Cadium
Composite
200.7
0.0050
BDL
mg/I
1
Chromium
Composite
200.7
0.010
BDL
mg/I
1
Copper
Composite
200.7
0.020
BDL
mg/I
1
Lead
Composite
200.7
0.0050
BDL
mg/I
1
Mercury
Composite
245.1
0.00020
BDL
ng/I
1
Nickel •
Composite
200.7.
0.020
BDL
mg/I
1
Selenium
Composite
200.7
0.020
BDL
mg/I
1
Silver
Composite
200.7
0.010
BDL
mg/I
1
Thallium
Composite
200.7
0.0200
BDL
mg/I
1
Zinc
Composite
200.7
0.030
0.095
mg/I
1
Cyanide
Grab
335.3
0.005
BDL
mg/I
1
Total phenolic compounds
Composite
420.2
0.040
BDL
mg/I
1
_
Volatile organic compounds
Acrolein
Grab
8260B
0.050
BDL
mg/I
1
Acrylonitrile
Grab
8260E
0.010
BDL
mg/I
1
Benzene
Grab
8260B
0.0010
BDL
mg/I
1
Bromoform
Grab
8260E
0.0010
BDL
mg/I
1
Carbon tetrachloride
Grab
8260B
0.0010
BDL
mg/I
1
Chlorobenzene
Grab
8260E
0.0010
BDL
mg/I
1
Chlorodibromomethane
Grab
8260B
0.0010
BDL
mg/I
1
Chloroethane
Grab
.. 8260E
0.0050
BDL
mg/I
1
2-chloroethylvinyl ether
Grab
8260B
0.050
BDL
mg/I
1
Chloroform
Grab
8260E
0.0050
BDL
mg/I
1
Dichlorobromomethane
Grab
8260E
0.0010
BDL
mg/I
1
1,1-dichloroethane
Grab
8260E
0.0010
BDL
mg/I
1
1,2-dichloroethane
Grab
8260B
0.0010
BDL
mg/I
1
Trans-1,2-dichloroethylene
Grab
8260B
0.0010
BDL
mg/I
1
orm-DMR-PPA-1
*Environmental Science Corp
Page 1

Annual Monitoring and Pollutant Scan
Permit No: NC0086550
Outfall: 001
Month: August
•
S
Sample
Analytical
Quantitation
Sample
Units of
Number of
Parameter
Type
Method
Level
Result
Measurement
Samples
Volatile organic compounds (Cont.)
-
1,1-dichloroethylene
Grab
82608
0.0010
BDL
mg/I
1
1,2-dichloropropane
Grab
6260E
0.0010
BDL
mg/I
1
1,3-dichloropropylene cis, trans
Grab
6260E
0.0010
BDL
mg/I
1
Ethylbenzene
Grab
8260B
0.0010
BDL
mg/I
1
Methyl bromide
Grab
8260B
0.0050
BDL
mg/I
1
Methyl Chloride
Grab
9260E
0.0010
BDL
mg/I
1
Methylene Chloride
Grab
8260B
0.0050
BDL
mg/I
1 —
1,1,2,2-tetrachloroethane
Grab
8260B
0.0010
BDL
mg/I
1
Tetrachloroethylene
Grab
8260E
0.0010
BDL
mg/I
1
Toluene
Grab
8260B
0.0050
BDL
mg/I
1
1,1,1-trichloroethane
Grab
8260B
0.0010
BDL
mg/I
1
1,1,2-trichloroethane
Grab
8260B
0.0010
BDL
mg/I
1
Trichloroethylene
Grab
8260B
0.0010
BDL
mg/I
1
Vinyl Chloride
Grab
6260E
0.0010
BDL
mg/I
1
Acid -extractable compounds
_
1
p-chloro-m-creso
Comp
625
0.010
BDL
mg/I
1 '
2-chlorophenol
Comp
625
0.010
BDL
mg/I
1
2,4-dichlorophenol
Comp
625
0.010
BDL
mg/1
1
2,4-dimethylphenol
Comp
625
0.010
BDL
ma/1
1
4,6-dinitro-o-cresol
Comp
625
0.010
BDL
mg/1
1
2,4-dinitrophenol
Comp
625
0.010
BDL
mg/1
1
2-nitrophenol
Comp
625
0.010
BDL
mg/I
1
4-nitrophenol
Comp
625
0.010
BDL
mg/I
1
Pentachlorophenol
Comp
625
0.010
BDL
mg/I
1
Phenol
Comp
625
0.010
BDL
mg/I
1 '
2,4,6-trichlorophenol
Comp
625
0.010
BDL
mg/I
1
Base -neutral compounds
Acenaphthene
Comp
625
0.010
BDL
mg/1
1
Acenaphthylene
Comp
625
0.010
BDL
mg/I
1
Anthracene
Comp
625
0.010
BDL
mg/I
1
Benzidine
Comp
625
0.050
BDL
mg/I
1 -
Benzo(a)anthracene
Comp
625
0.010
BDL
mg/I
1
Benzo(a) pyrene
Comp
625
0.010
BDL
mg/I
1
3,4-benzofluoranthene
Comp
625
0.010
BDL
mg/I
1
Benzo(ghi)perylene
Comp
625
0.010
BDL
mg/1
1
Benzo(k)fluoranthene
Comp
625
0.010
BDL
mg/1
1
Bis(2-chloroethoxy) methane
Comp
625
0.010
BDL
mg/I
1
Bis(2-chloroethyl) ether
Comp
625
0.010
BDL
mg/I
1
Bis(2-chloroisopropyl) ether
Comp
625
0.010
BDL
mg/I
1
Bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate
Comp
625
0.010
BDL
mg/I
1 _
4-bromophenyl phenyl ether
Comp
625
0.010
BDL
mg/I
1
Butyl benzyl phthalate
Comp
625
0.010
BDL
mg/I
1
2-Chloronaphthalene
Comp
625
0.010
BDL
mg/I
1
4- chlorophenyl phenyl ether
i ,,r.,,_ nano DDA 4
Comp
625
0.010
BDL
mg/I
1
Page 2

Annual Monitoring and Pollutant Scan
Permit No: NC0086550
O utfa ll: 001
Month: August
•
S
Sample
Analytical
Quantitation
Sample
. vu.. LVV !
Units of
Number of
Parameter
Type
Method
Level
Result
leasureme
Samples
Base -neutral compounds (Cont.)
Chrysene
Comp
625
0.010
BDL
mg/1
1
Di-n-butyl phthalate
Comp
625
0.010
BDL
mg/1
1
Di-n-octyl phthalate
Comp
625
0.010
BDL
mg/I
1
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
Comp
625
0.010
BDL
mg/I
1
1,2-dichlorobenzene
Comp
8260B
0.001
BDL
mg/I
1
1,3-dichlorobenzene
Comp
8260B
0.001
BDL
mg/I
1
1,4-dichlorobenzene
Comp
8260B
0.001
BDL
mg/I
1
3,3-dichlorobenzidine
Comp
625
0.010
BDL
mg/I
1
Diethyl phthalate
Comp
625
0.010
BDL
mg/I
1
Dimethyl phthalate
Comp
625
0.010
BDL
mg/I
1
2,4-dinitrotoluene
Comp
625
0.010
BDL
mg/I
1
2,6-dinitrotoluene
Comp
625
0.010
BDL
mg/I
1
1,2-diphenylhydrazine
Comp
625
0.010
BDL
mg/I
1
Fluoranthene
Comp
625
0.010
BDL
mg/I
1
Fluorene
Comp
625
0.010
BDL
mg/I
1
Hexachlorobenzene
Comp
625
0.010
BDL
mg/1
1
Hexachlorobutadiene
Comp
625
0.010
BDL
mg/I
1
Hexachlorocyclo-pentadiene
Comp
625
0.010
BDL
mg/I
1
Hexachloroethane
Comp
625
0.010
BDL
mg/I
1
Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene
Comp
625
0.010
BDL
mg/I
1
Isophorone
Comp
625
0.010
BDL
mg/I
1
Naphthalene
Comp
625
0.010
BDL
mg/I
1
Nitrobenzene
Comp
625
0.010
BDL
mg/I
1
N-nitrosodi-n-propylamine
Comp
625
0.010
BDL
mg/1
1
N-nitrosodimethylamine
Comp
625
0.050
BDL
mg/I
1
N-nitrosodiphenylamine
Comp
625
0.010
BDL
mg/I
1
Phenanthrene
Comp
625
0.010
BDL
mg/I
1
Pyrene
Comp
625
0.010
BDL
mg/I
1
1,2,4,-trichlorobenzene
Comp
625
0.010
BDL
mg/I
1
I certify under penalty of law that this document and all attachments were prepared under my
direction and supervision in accordance with a system to design to assure that qualified personnel
properly gather and evaluate the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or
persons that manage the system, or those persons directly responsibility for gathering the
information, the information submitted is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate and
complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information, including
the possibility of fines and imprisonment for ISnowinns.
\c,
Woc r /otc)(A_
Au horized R resentative Name
Signature
Form-DMR-PPA-1
Ar
ro-s v7
Page 3

AMENDED REPORT
Annual Monitoring and Pollutant Scan
Permit No: NC0086550
Outfall: 001
Month: Mav
Year. 2006
Facility Name: Town of Fairmont ORC: Johnny Britt
Date of Sampling: Mav 1- 2, 2006 Phone: [phone] or [phone]
Analytical Laboratory: 1) TBL, 2) Environmental Science Corp.
Sample
Analytical
Quantitation
Sample
Units of
Number of
Parameter
Type
Method
Level
Result
Measurement
Samples
Ammonia (as N)
Composite
SM4500-NH3F
<0.1
1.2
mg/I
1
Dissolved Oxygen
Grab
SM4500-0G
1
9.0
mg/I
1
Nitrate/Nitrite
Composite
EPA 353.2
0.10
1.16
mg/1
1
Total IGeldahl Nitrogen
Composite
EPA 351.1
0.5
1.2
mg/I
1
Total Phosphorus
Composite
EPA 200.7
0.020
0.718
mg/I
1
Total Dissolved Solids
Composite
EPA 160.1
10
240
mg/I
1
Hardness
Composite
CALC.
19
mg/I
1
Chlorine (total residual,TRC)
Grab
SM 4500 CIG
0
<10
ugll
1
Oil and Grease
Grab
EPA 413.1
5
1.7
mg/I
1
Metals (Total Recoverable), Cyanide and Total Phenols
Antinomy
Composite
EPA 200.7
0.010
<0.010 (BDL)
mg/I
1
Arsenic
Composite
EPA 200.7
0.020
<0.020 (BDL)
mg/I
1
Beryllium
Composite
EPA 200.7
0.0020
<0.0020 (BDL)
mg/I
1
Cadium
Composite
EPA 200.7
0.0050
<0.0050 (BDL)
mg/1
1
Chromium
Composite
EPA 200.7
0.010
<0.010 (BDL)
mg/I
1
Copper
Composite
EPA 200.7
0.020
<0.020 (BDL)
mg/I
1
Lead
Composite
EPA 200.7
0.0050
<0.0050 (BDL)
mg/I
.1
Mercury
Composite
EPA 245.1
0.00020
<0.0002 (BDL)
mg/I
1
Nickel
Composite
EPA 200.7
0.020
<0.020 (BDL)
mg/1
1
Selenium
Composite
EPA 200.7
0.020
<0.020 (BDL)
mg/I ._
1
Silver
Composite
EPA 200.7
0.010
<0.010 (BDL)
mgl
1
Thallium
Composite
EPA 200.8
0.0010
<0.0010 (BDL)
mg/1
1
Zinc
Composite
EPA 200.7
0.030
<0.030 (BDL)
mg/i
1
Cyanide
Grab
EPA 335.2
0.0050
<0.0050 (BDL)
mg/I
1
Total phenolic compounds
Composite
EPA 420.2
0.040
<0.040 (BDL)
mg/1
1
Volatile Organic Compounds
Acroiein
Grab
EPA 624
0.0010
<0.0010 (BDL)
`'mgA
1
Acrylonitrile
Grab
EPA 624
0.0010
<0.0010 (BDL)
mg/I
1
Benzene
Grab
EPA 624
0.0010
<0.0010 (BDL)
mg/1
1
Bromoform
Grab
EPA 624
0.0010
<0.0010 (BDL)
mg/I '
1
Carbon tetrachloride
Grab
EPA 624
0.0010
<0.0010 (BDL)
mg/i
1
Chlorobenzene
Grab
EPA 624
0.0010
<0.0010 (BDL)
mg/I
1
Chlorodibromomethane
Grab
EPA 624
0.0010
<0.0010 (BDL)
mg/1
1
Chioroethane
Grab
EPA 624
0.0010
<0.0010 (BDL)
mg/I
1
2-chioroethylvinyl ether
Grab
EPA 624
0.050
<0.050 (BDL)
mgA
1
Chloroform
Grab
. EPA 624
0.0050
<0.0050 (BDL)
mg/I
1
Dichlorobromomethane
Grab
EPA 624
0.0010
<0.0010 (BDL)
mg/I
1
1,1-dichioroethane
Grab
EPA 624
0.0010
<0.0010 (BDL)
mgA
1
1,2-dichloroethane
Grab
EPA 624
0.0010
<0.0010 (BDL)
mgA
1
Trans-1,2-dichioroethyiene
Grab
EPA 624
0.0010
<0.0010 (BDL)
mgA
1
Form-DMR-PPA-1
Page 1

AMENDED REPORT
Annual Monitoring and Pollutant Scan
Permit No: NC0086550
Outfall: 001
Month: May
Year. 2006
Sample
Analytical
Quantltation
Sample
Units of
Number of
Parameter
Type
Method
Level
Result
Measurement
Samples
Volatile Organic Compounds (Cont.)
1,1dichloroethylene
Grab
EPA624
0.0010
<0.0010 (BDL)
mg/I
1
1,2-dichloropropane
Grab
EPA 624
0.0010
<0.0010 (BDL)
mg/I
1
1,3-dichloropropylene cis, trans
Grab
EPA 624
0.0010
<0.0010 (BDL)
Mil
1
Elhylbenzene
Grab
EPA 624
0.0010
<0.0010 (BDL)
mg/I
1
Methyl bromide
Grab
EPA 824
0.0010
<0.0010 (BDL)
mg/I
1
Methyl Chloride
Grab
EPA 624
0.0010
<0.0010 (BDL)
mg/I
1
Methylene Chloride
Grab
EPA 624
0.0050
<0.0050 (BDL)
mg/I
1
1,1,2,2-tetrachloroethane
Grab
EPA624
0.0010
<0.0010 (BDL)
mg/I
1
Tetrachloroethylene
Grab
EPA 624
0.0010
<0.0010 (BDL)
mg/I
1
Toluene
Grab
EPA 624
0.0050
.<0.0050 (BDL)
mg/I
1
1,1,1-trichloroethane
Grab
EPA624
0.0010
<0.0010 (BDL)
mg/I
1
1,1,2-trichloroethane
Grab
EPA624
0.0010
<0.0010 (BDL)
mg/I
1
Trichloroethylene
Grab
EPA 624
0.0010
<0.0010 (BDL)
mg/I
1
Vinyl Chloride
Grab
EPA 624
0.0010
<0.0010 (BDL)
mgA
1
1,2dichlorobenzene
Grab
' EPA 624
0.0010
<0.0010 (BDL)
mg/I
1
1,3dichlorobenzene
Grab
EPA 624
0.0010
<0.0010 (BDL)
mg/I
1
1,4-dichlorobenzene
Grab
EPA 624
0.0010
<0.0010 (BDL)
me
1
Acid -Extractable Compounds
p-chloro-m-creso
Comp
EPA 625
0.010
<0.010 (BDL)
mgA
1
2-chlorophenol
Comp
EPA 625
0.010
<0.010 (BDL)
mgA
1
2,4-dichlorophenol
Comp
EPA 625
0.010
<0.010 (BDL)
mg/I
1
2,4-dimethylphenol
Comp
EPA 625
0.010
<0.010 (BDL)
mg/I
1
4,6-dinitro-o-cresol
Comp
EPA 625
0.010
<0.010 (BDL)
mgA
1
2,4-dinitrophenol
Comp
EPA 625
0.010
<0.010 (BDL)
mg/I
1
2-nitrophenol
Comp
EPA 625
0.010
<0.010 (BDL)
mg/I
1
4-nitroptrenol
Comp
EPA 625
0.010
<0.010 (BDL)
mg/I
1
Pentachlorophenol
Comp
EPA625
0.010
<0.010 (BDL)
mgA
1
Phenol
Comp
EPA 625
0.010
<0.010 (BDL)
mg/I
1
2,4,6-lrichlorophenol
Comp
EPA 625
0.010
<0.010 (BDL)
mg/I
1
Base -Neutral Compounds
Acenaphthene
Comp
EPA625
0.010
<0.010(BDL)
mg/I
1
Acenaphthylene
Comp
EPA 625
0.010
<0.010 (BDL)
mg/I
1
Anthracene
Comp
EPA 625
0.010
<0.010 (BDL)
mg/I
1
Benzidine
Comp
EPA 625
0.050
<0.050 (BDL)
mgA
1
Benzo(a)anthracene
Comp
EPA 625
0.010
<0.010 (BDL)
mg/I
1
Benzo(a) pyrene
Comp
EPA 625
0.010
<0.010 (BDL)
mgA
1
3,4-benzofluoranthene
Comp
EPA 625
0.010
<0.010 (BDL)
mg/I
1
Benzo(ghi)perylene
Comp
EPA 625
0.010
<0.010 (BDL)
mg/I
1
Benzo(k)fluoranthene
Comp
EPA 625
0.010
<0.010 (BDL)
mg/I
1
Bis(2chloroethoxy) methane
Comp
EPA 625
0.010
<0.010 (BDL)
mg/I
1
Bis(2-chloroethyl) ether
Comp
EPA 625
0.010
<0.010 (BDL)
mg/I
1
Bis(2-chloroisopropyi) ether
Comp
EPA 625
0.010
<0.010 (BDL)
mg/I
1
Bis(2-ethythexyl) phthalate
Comp
EPA 625
0.010
<0.010 (BDL)
mg/I
1
4-bromophenyl phenyl ether
Comp
EPA 625
0.010
<0.010 (BDL)
mg/I
1
Butyl benzyl phthalate
Comp
EPA 625
0.010
<0.010 (BDL)
mg/I
1
2-Chloronaphthalene
Comp
EPA 625
0.010
<0.010 (BDL)
mg/I
1
4-Chlorophenyl phenylether
Comp
EPA 625
0.010
50.010 (BDL)
mg/1
1
Form-DMR-PPA-1
Page 2

AMENDED REPORT
Annual Monitoring and Pollutant Scan
Permit No: NC0086550
Duffel!: 001
Month: May
Year: 2006
Sample
Analytical
Quantitation
Sample
Units of
Number of
Parameter
Type
Method
Level
Result
easuremei
Samples
Base -Neutral Compounds (Cont.)
Chrysene
Comp
EPA 625
0.010
<0.010 (BDL)
mg/I
1
Di-n-butyl phthalate
Comp
EPA 625
0.010
<0.010 (BDL)
mg/I
1
Di-n-octyl phthalate
Comp
EPA 625
0.010
<0.010 (BDL)
mg/I
1
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
Comp
EPA 625
0.010
<0.010 (BDL)
mg/I
1
3,3-flchlorobenzidine
Comp
EPA 625
0.010
<0.010 (BDL)
mg/I
1
Diethyl phthalate
Comp
EPA 625
0.010
<0.010 (BDL)
mg/I
1
Dimethyl phthalate
Comp
EPA 625
0.010
<0.010 (BDL)
mg/I
1
2,4-dinitrotoluene
Comp
EPA 625
0.010
<0.010 (BDL)
mg/I
1
2,6-dinitrotoluene
Comp
EPA 625
0.010
<0.010 (BDL)
mg/I
1
1,2-diphenylhydrazine
Comp
EPA 625
0.010
<0.010 t;BDL)
mg/I
1
Fluoranthene
Comp
EPA 625
0.010
<0.010 (BDL)
mg/I
1
Fluorene
Comp
EPA 625
0.010
<0.010 (BDL)
mgA
1
Hexachlorobenzene
Comp
EPA 625
0.010
<0.010 (BDL)
mg/I
1
Hexachloro-1,3-butadiene
Comp
EPA 625
0.010
<0.010 (BDL)
mg/I
1
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene
Comp
EPA 625
0.010
<0.010 (BDL)
mg/I
1
Hexachloroethane
Comp
EPA 625
0.010
<0.010 (BDL)
mg/I
1
Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene
Comp
EPA 625
0.010
<0.010 (BDL)
mgll
1
Isophorone
Comp
EPA 625
0.010
<0.010 (BDL)
mgA
1
Naphthalene
Comp
EPA 625
0.010
<0.010 (BDL)
mg/I
1
Nitrobenzene
Comp
EPA 625
0.010
<0.010 (BDL)
mg/I
1
n-Nitrosodi-n-propylamine
Comp
EPA 625
0.010
<0.010 (BDL)
mg/I
1
n-Nitrosodimethylamine
Comp
EPA 625
0.010
<0.010 (BDL)
mgA
1
n-Nitrosodiphenylamine
Comp
EPA 625
0.010
<0.010 (BDL)
mg/I
1
Phenenthrene
Com
Pyre
Compp
EPA 625
0.010
<0.010 (BDL)
mg/I
1
1,2,4,-trichlorobenzene
Comp
EPA 625
0.010
<0.010 (BDL)
mg/I
1
I certify under penalty of law that this document and all attachments were prepared under my
direction and supervision in accordance with a system to design to assure that qualified personnel
properly gather and evaluate the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or
persons that manage the system, or those persons directly responsibility for gathering the
information, the information submitted is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate and
complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information, including
the possibility of fines and imprisonment for knowing violations.
Blake Proctor, Town Manager
Auutt ri d Re esent tive Name
Si nature
Form-DMR-PPA-1
Page 3

ti
n
Attachment 3
Toxicity Test Results

01/26/2009 11:46 9106718837 TBL PAGE 03
Efflueiit Toxicity R -.. orm-Chronic Fathead Minnow Multi -Concentration Test
Date:1 /19/2009
Facility: Fairmont NPDES # NCOO 86550 Pipe #: County: Robeson
Laboratory: Meritech, Inc.
x
Signature of Operator in Responsible Charge
x
Signature of Laboratory Supervisor
v
Comments
i
MAIL ORIGINAL TO:
Environmental Sciences Branch
Division of Water Quality
NC DENR
1621 Mil Service Center
Raleigh. NC 27699-1621
Test Initiation Date/Time 1/6/2009
% Eff.
(Control I
Repl.
Surviving #
Original #
Wt/original (mg)
r 0.551
Surviving #
Original #
Wt/original (mg)
1.1
Sun/Wing #
Original #
Wt/original (mg)
2.2
Surviving #
Original #
Wt/original (mg)
r. 4,4
Surviving #
Original #
Wt/original (mg)
8.8 Surviving #
Original #
Wt/original (mg)
Water Quality Data
Control
pH (SU) Init/Fin
DO (mg/L) Init/Fin
Temp (C) Init/Fin
High Concentration
pH (SU) Init/Fin
DO (mg/L) Init/Fin
Temp (C) Init/Fin
Sample
Collection Start Date
Grab
Composite (Duration)
Hardness (mg/L)
Alkalinity (mg/L)
Conductivity (umhos/cm)
Chlorine(mg/L)
Temp. at Receipt ("C)
Dilution H2O Batch #
Hardness (mg/L)
Alkalinity (mg/L)
Conductivity (umhos/cm)
1
12:30 PM
2 3
4
Avg Wt/Surv. Control
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
0.755
0.728
0.767
0,854
9
10
9
9
10
10
10
10
0.565
0.851
0.770
0,679
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
0.753
0.685
0.717
0,664
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
0,744
0.737
0.672
0.585
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
0.626
0.746
0.651
0.781
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
0,693
0.819
0,595
0,795
Day
% Survival
Avg Wt (mg)
% Survival
Avg Wt (mg)
% Survival
Avg Wt (mg)
% Survival
Avg Wt (mg)
% Survival
Avg Wt (mg)
% Survival
Avg Wt (mg)
0.776 I
100.0
I 0.776 I
92.5
0.716
100.0 I
0.705
1o0.a I
I 0.685
100.0 I
0.701
100.0 I
I 0,726
Test Organisms
Cultured In -House
Outside Supplier
Hatch Date: 1/5/09
Hatch Time: 3:00 pm CT
0
2
3
1
7.78
8.10 /
7,85
8.07 /
7.71
7,98 /
7,85
8.03 /
7,73
8.09 1
7.72
8.03 /
7.40
L8,01
7,60 /
7.16
7.71 /
7,50
7.84 /
7.12
7,70 /
7.76
7.93 /
7,39
8,04 /
6.90
7.79 /
6.77
24.9 /
25.0
25.1 /
25,0
25.0 /
24.9
24,7 /
25.1
24.9 /
25,0
25.0 /
25.0
24.7 /
25,0
0
7.94 /
7.68
7.95 /
7,78
7,96
/ 7.86
7,95 /
7.89
7.94 /
7.68
7.88 /
7.65
7.92 /
7.37
7.67 _ /
7,29
7.72 /
7.31
7,83
/ 7.02
7.64 /
7.91
8.05 /
7.67
8.03 /
6.73
7.71 /
6.53
24.9 /
25.0
25.1 /
25.0
25,0
r 24.9
24.7 /
25.1
24.9 /
25.0
25.0 /
25.0
24.7 /
25.0
1
3
1/4/2009
1/5/2009
1/8/2009
24.0
24.0
24,0
26
_ 28
28
46
44
49
255
237
270
<0.1
<0.1
<0,1
1.0
1.0
0.1
322
44
60
244
323
324
46
59
44
52
222
211
325
44
52
220
Survival Growth Overall Result
Normal I►"° I PI ChV
Hom, Var. (r i r'I
NOEC 8.8 8.8
LOBO >8.8 >8,8
CM/ >8.8 >8.8
Method Steel's Dunnet's
>8,8
Stars
Conc.
0.55
1,1
2.2
4.4
8.8
Survival
critical Calculated
10 12
10
10
10
10
18
18
18
18
Growth
Critical Calculated
2.41 1.0209
2.41 1.2174
2.41 1.5634
2.41 1.2815
2.41 0.8629
DW Form AT.5 T/04

Effluent Toxicity Report Form -Chronic Fathead Minnow Multi -Concentration Test
Date:11/18/2008
.Facility: Fairmont
NPDES # NCO() 86550
Pipe #:
County: Robeson
x
Lo�atory„Meritech, Inc,
Signature of 0
x
esponsible Charge
Signature of Laboratory Supervisor
Comments
MAIL ORIGINAL TO:
Environmental Sciences Branch
Division of Water Quality
NC DENR
1621 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1621
Test Initiation Date/Time 11/4/2008
Eff.
Control
Repl.
Surviving #
Original #
Wt/original (mg)
0.551
Surviving #
Original #
Wt/original (mg)
Surviving #
Original #
Wt/original (mg)
Surviving #
Original #
Wt//original (mg)
1.1
2.2
4.4
Surviving #
Original #
Wt/original (mg)
8.8
Surviving #
Original #
Wt/original (mg)
Water Quality Data
Control
pH (SU) Init/Fin
DO (mg/L) Init/Fin
Temp (C) Init/Fin
High Concentration
pH (SU) Init/Fin
DO (mg/L) Init/Fin
Temp (C) Init/Fin
Sample
Collection Start Date
Grab
Composite (Duration)
Hardness (mg/L)
Alkalinity (mg/L)
Conductivity (umhos/cm)
Chlorine(mg/L)
Temp. at Receipt ('C)
Dilution H2O Batch #
Hardness (mg/L)
Alkalinity (mg/L)
Conductivity (umhos/cm)
1
2
1:15 PM
3
Avg Wt/Surv. Control
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
0.664
0.572
0.578
0.649
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
0.735
0.533
0.589
0.617
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
0.558
0.540
0.559
0.675
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
0.611
0.578
0.637
0.610
10
10
10
9
10
10 •
•10 •
10
0.509
0.655
0.597
0.590
10
10
. 8
9
10
10
10
10
0.641
0.637
0.533
0.626
• Day
% Survival
Avg Wt (mg)
% Survival
Avg Wt (mg)
% Survival
0.616
I 100.0 I
Avg Wt (mg)
0.616
100.0 I
% Survival
Avg Wt (mg)
% Survival
I 0.619 I
Avg Wt (mg)
100.0
0.583 I
% Survival
Avg Wt (mg)
100.0
0.609
97.5 1
0.588
92.5
0.609
Test Organisms
Cultured In -House
T Outside Supplier
Hatch Date: 11/3/08
Hatch Time: • 3:00 pm. CT
0
2
• 3
4
5
6
7.95 /
7.40
8.01 /
7.85
8.08 /
7.73
7.95 /
7.67
7.94 /
7.46
.7.81 /
7.62
7.99 /
7.54
7.49 /
6.78
7.50 /
7.36
7.75 /
7.22
7.62 /
7.30
7.76 /
6.45
.7.75 /
7.01
7.60 /
7.35
24.8 /
24.9
24.9 /
24.7
25.1 /
24.9
24.7 /
25.0
25.0 /
24.7
24.8 /
24.8
24.5 /
24.9
2
3
4
5
7.87 /
7.42
8.00 /
7.84
8.08 /
7.73
7.93 /
7.70
7.94 /
7.46
7.81 /
7.66
7.94 /
7.59
7.44 /
6.69
7.53 /
7.32
7.69 /
7.13
7.69 /
7.25
7.73 /
6.67
7.88 /
6.95
7.51 /
7.45
24.8 /
24.9
24.9 /
24.7
25.1 /
24.9
24.7 /
25.0
25.0 /
24.7
24.8 /
24.8
24.5 /
24.9
1
2
3
11/2/2008
11/3/2008
11/6/2008
24.0
24.0
24.0
30
30
28
63
64
63
482
475
425
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
1.7
1.9
0.5
299
50
53
205
300
301
48
44
58
59
222
218
302
303
42
42
52
62
198
208
Normal
Horn. Var.
NOEC
LOEC
ChV
Method
>8.8
>8.8
Steel's
Growth
U•I.
8.8
>8.8
>8.8
Dunnet's
Overall Result
ChV
I >8.8 I
Stats
Conc.
0.55
1.1
2.2
4.4
Survival
Critical Calculated
10 18
10
10
10
18
18
16
Growth
Critical Calculated
2.41-0.0671
2.41
2.41
2.41
0.7990
0.1647
0.6831
2.41 0.1586
DWQ Form AT-5 (1/04)
8.8
10
14

• •-Elft tent Toxicity Report Form -Chronic Fathead Minnow Multi -Concentration 1 est
Facility Fairmont '
NPDES # NCO() 86550 P
ipe #: County: Robeson
Labofatory: Meritech, Inc.
of Ope
x
ible Charge r, y
Signature of Laboratory Supervisor
Comments
Dilution water batch 272 not used.
MAIL ORIGINAL TO:
Environmental Sciences Branch
Division of Water Quality
NC DENR
1621 Mail Service Center
Raleigh. NC 27699-1621
_st Initiation DateTme
% Eft.
Control
Repl.
Surviving #
Original #
Wt/original (mg)
0.55
Surviving #
Original #
Wt/original (mg)
1:11
Surviving #
Original #
Wt/original (mg)
2.2
Surviving #
Original #
Wt/original (mg)
4.4 Surviving #
Original #
Wt/original (mg)
8.81
Surviving #
Original #
Wt/original (mg)
-hater Quality Data
Control
pH (SU) Init/Fin
DO (mg/L) Init/Fin
Temp (C) Init/Fin
_IHigh Concentration
. pH (SU) Init/Fin
DO (mg/L) Init/Fin
Temp (C) Init/Fin
ISample
Collection Start Date
Grab
Composite (Duration)
Hardness (mg/L)
Alkalinity (mg/L)
Conductivity (umhos/cm)
Chlorine(mglL)
Temp. at Receipt (°C)
`ilution H2O Batch #
Hardness (mg/L)
Alkalinity (mg/L)
Conductivity (umhoslcm)
8/5/2008
1
2
11:30 AM Avg Wt/Surv. Control' 0.552 I Test Organisms
3
4
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
0.451
0.564
0.505
0.686
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
0.513
0.618
0.571
0.528
10
10 .
9 .
. 10
10
10
10
10
0.458
0.520
0.522
0.590
10
10
10.
10
10
10 .
10
10
0.545
0.616
0.526
0.500
10
9
10
10
10
10
10
•10
0.500
0.531
0.508 . .
0.549
10
10
9
10
10
10
10
10
0.449
0:423
0.580
0.473.
Day
Survival
I 100.0
r Cultured In -House
Fi Outside Supplier
Avg Wt (mg)I 0.552 Hatch Date: 8/4/08
% Survival
Avg Wt (mg)
Vo Survival
I 100.0
Avg Wt (mg)
I 0.558
% Survival
I 97.5
Avg Wt (mg)
I 0.523
100.0
% Survival
Avg Wt (mg)
I 0.547
% Survival
Avg Wt (mg)
I 97.5
I 0.522
I 97.5
I 0.481
Hatch Time: 3:00 pm CT
5
8.06 /
7.88
'8.23 /
8.11
8.21 /
8.04
8.20 /
8.01.
8.16 /
8.30
8.03 /
7.99
8.17 /
8.24
7.30 /
7.07
7.36 /
7.25
7.46 /
7.20
7.41 /
7.26
7.60 /
7.36
7.49 /
7.30
7.49 /
7.36
25.6 /
24.9
25.0 /
24.7.
25.0 /
24.8
25.0 /
24.8
25.1 /
25.0
25.0 /
24.9
24.9 /
25.0
6
8.05
u
l 7.87
8.10
1
/ 8.03
8.15
/ 8.01
8.13
/
8.05
.
8.07 /
8.12
7.98 /
8.09
8.14
18.00
7.44
/ 7.20
7.46
17.29
7.37
17.21
7.36
/
7.22
7.58 /
7.29
7.42 /
7.36
7.51
/ 7.61
25.6
/ 24.9
25.0
/ 24.7
25.0
/ 24.8
25.0
.I
24.8
25.1 /
25.0
25.0 /
24.9
24.9
/ 25.0
1
2
3
8/3/2008
8/4/2008
8/7/2008
24.0
24.0
24.0
30
30
30
78
76
78
390
287
408
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
0.8
1.2
0.3
269
40
55
198
270
271
42
40
64
66
213
218
273
40
54
213
Normal
Horn. Var.
NOEC
LOEC >8.8 >8.8
Growth
(�)
8.8.
Survival
r;
111
8.8
ChV >8.8 >8.8
Method Steel's Dunnet's
Overall Result
ChV
r >8.8
Stats
Conc.
0.55
1.1
2.2
4.4
8.8
Survival
Critical Calculated
10 18
10 16
10 18
10 16
10 16
Growth
Critical Calculated
2.41 -0.1370
2.41 0.6620
2.41 0.1084
2.41 0.6734
2.41 1.6037
DWQ Form AT-5 (1/04)

tttluent 1,G;ocit1(Keport rorm-L.nronic ratneau II/willow IVIUIti-' orleerltr iUUrl I e't
Facility: Fairmont
Laboratory:
Meritech, Inc.
NPDES # NCOO 86550
Pipe #: County: Robeson
Comments
perat& le Charge
Signature of Laboratory Supervisor
MAIL ORIGINAL TO:
Environmental Sciences Branch
Division of Water Quality
NC DENR
1621 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1621
=st Initiation Date/Time 6/24/2008 / 1:15 PM
% Eff.
Control
Repl.
Surviving #
Original #
WUoriginal (mg)
0.55
Surviving #
Original #
WUoriginal (mg)
1.1
Surviving #
Original #
WUoriginal (mg)
2.2
Surviving #
Original #
WUoriginal (mg)
4.4
Surviving #
Original #
WUoriginal (mg)
8.8
Surviving #
Original #
WUoriginal (mg)
Water Quality Data
Control
pH (SU) lnit/Fin
DO (mg/L) IniUFin
Temp (C) IniUFin
High Concentration
pH (SU) IniUFin
1 DO (mg/L) Init/Fin
Temp (C) Init/Fin
1
2
3
4
Avg WUSurv. Control
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
0.538
0.531
0.527
0.506
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
0.540
0.561
0.546
0.549
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
0.568
0.505
0.518
0.542
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
0.544
0.512
0.522
0.516
Sample
-1 Collection Start Date
Grab
Composite (Duration)
Hardness (mg/L)
Alkalinity (mg/L)
Conductivity (umhos/cm)
Chlorine(mg/L)
- , Temp. at Receipt ("C)
Dilution H2O Batch
Hardness (mg/L)
Alkalinity (mg/L)
Conductivity (umhos/cm)
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
0.538
0.576
0.514
0.531
10
10
9
10
10
10
10
10
0.509
0.518
0.453
0.545
Day
% Survival
Avg Wt (mg)
% Survival
Avg Wt(mg)
% Survival
Avg Wt (mg)
% Survival
Avg Wt (mg)
% Survival
Avg Wt(mg)
Vo Survival
Avg Wt (mg)
0.526
100.0
0.526
100.0
0.549
100.0
0.533
100.0
0.524
100.0
0.540
97.5
0.506
0
2
3
4
5
6
8.08 /
7.80
8.00 /
7.80
7.99 /
7.64
7.98 /
7.71
8.00 /
7.72
8.05 /
7.78
8.08 /
7.75
7.38 /
7.08
7.49 /
7.32
7.54 /
6.82
7.31 /
7.14
7.55 /
7.22
7.50 /
7.21
7.45 /
7.45
24.8 /
25.4
24.8 /
25.2
24.9 /
25.1
25.2 /
25.4
25.0 /
25.2
24.9 /
25.0
25.1 /
25.0
0
2
3
4
5
6
7.99 /
7.85
7.98 /
7.78
7.99 /
7.72
8.09 /
7.80
7.97 /
7.81
8.02 /
7.83
8.12 /
7.75
7.44 /
7.07
7.56 /
7.08
7.36 /
6.72
7.30 /
7.20
7.51 /
7.16
7.40 /
7.14
7.40 /
6.90
24.8 /
25.4
24.8 /
25.2
24.9 /
25.1
25.2 /
25.4
25.0 /
25.2
24.9 /
25.0
25.1 /
25.0
2
3
6/22/2008
6/23/2008
6/26/2008
24.0
24.0
24.0
26
28
28
82
79
78
404
385
391
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
1.9
1.1
1.3
255
38
53
192
256
257
38
38
53
51
198
180
258
259
38
36
49
52
193
193
Normal I;
Horn. Var. Ir"I
NOEC 8.8 8.8
LOEC >8.8 >8.8
ChV >8.8 >8.8
Method Steel's Dunnett's
Survival Growth
PI
Test Organisms
r Cultured In -House
Iv Outside Supplier
Hatch Date: 6/23/08
Hatch Time: 3:00 PM CT
Overall Result
ChV
>8.8
Stats Survival - Growth
Conc. Critical Calculated Critical Calculated
0.55 10 18 2.41 -1.3755
1.1 10 18 2.41 -0.4536
2.2 10 18 2.41 0.1171
4.4 10 18 2.41 -0.8341
8.8 10 16 2.41 1.0829
DWQ Form AT-5 (1/04)

01/26/2009 11:46 9106718837
TBL
PAGE 02
Effluent Toxicity Report Form - Chronic Pass/Fail and Acute LC50
Facility: TOWN OF FAIRMONT TiJWTP
Laboratory Performing Test: MERITECH, INC
X
Signature of Operato
Signature or L oratory Supervisor
Date: 01/15/09
NPDES#: NC0086550 Pipe#; County: ROBESON
Comments: Dilution Water Batch
#713 & 714 Used
* PASSED; 5.38% Reduction *
Work Order:
MAIL ORIGINAL TO:
North Carolina Ceriodaphnia
Chronic Pass/Fail Reproduction Toxicity Test
CONTROL ORGANISMS 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
# Young Produced
29
27
26
2.4
28
19
Environmental Sciences Branch
Div. of Water Quality
N.C. DENR
1621 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1621
8 9 10 11 12
27 27 27 28 26 28
Adult (L)ive (D)ead
L L L L L L
1 Effluent %: 2.2t
- TREATMENT 2 ORGANISMS 1
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
# Young Produced
26
24
27
25
26
19
28
25
20
27
28 24
Adult (L)ive (D)ead
pH
Control
Treatment 2
D.O.
1st sample 1st sample 2nd sample
7.90
7.86
7.86
7.91
s
t
a
t
1st
7.92
7.93
7.81
8.00
7.96
7.90
7.96
7.89
s s
e t e t e
n a n a n
d r d r d
t t
sample 1st sample 2nd sample
Control 7.61
Treatment 2
7.53
7.55
7.70
7.75
7.75
7.58
7.59
7.88
7.59
7.76
7.71
LC50/Acute Toxicity Test
(Mortality expressed
L
Chronic Test Results
Calculated t =
Tabular t =
% Reduction = 5.38
$ Mortality
Avg.Reprod.
0.00
Control
26.33
Control
0.00
Treatment 2
24.92
Treatment 2
Control CV
10.025%
% control orgs
producing 3rd
brood
100%
PASS
X
Check One
FAIL
Complete This For Either Test
Test Start Date: 01/07/09
Collection (Start) Date
Sample 1: 01/05/09 Sample 2: 01/08/09
Sample Type/Duration
Sample 1
Sample 2
Grab
Comp.
Duration
24.0 hrs
24.0 hrs
I
L
U
T
2nd
1st P/F
S S
A A
M M
P p
Rardness(mg/1)
Spec. Cond.(µmhos)
Chlorine(mg/1)
Sample temp. at receipt(°C)
a$ %, combining replicates)
a
LC50
95' Confidence f,.ymits
* -- %
Concentration
Mortality
start/end
Method of Determination
Moving Average Probit
Spearman Kerber ` Other
Organism rested: Ceriodaphnia dubia
pH
Duration(hrs) :
Copied from DWO form AT-1 (3/87) rev. 11/95 (DUBIA ver. 4.41)
42
184
245
271
<0.1
<0.1
1.0
0.1.
Note: Please
Complete This
Section Also
Control
High
Conc.
start/end
D.O.

Effluent Toxicity Report Form - Chronic Pass/Fail and Acute LC50
'Date: 11/13/08
Facility: TOWN OF FAIRMONT WWTP
Laborat•, y P
Signature
rf orming
Tes : MEERIITTEECH,
of Laboratory Supervisor
INC
NPDES#: NC0086550 Pipe#: County: ROBESON
Comments: Dilution} Water Batch
#701 & 702 Used
* PASSED: -2.64% Reduction *
Work Order:
MAIL ORIGINAL TO:
North Carolina Ceriodaphnia
Chronic Pass/Fail Reproduction Toxicity Test
CONTROL ORGANISMS
Environmental Sciences Branch
Div. of Water Quality
N.C. DENR
1621 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1621
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
# Young Produced
25
27
24
24
21
28
31
30
27
22
17
27
Adult (L)ive (D)ead
Effluent %: 2.2%
TREATMENT 2 ORGANISMS 1 2
3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
# Young Produced
30
26
25
28
26
25
27
27
24
32
13
28
Adult (L) ive (D) ead
Chronic Test Results
Calculated t = -0.379
Tabular t = 2.508
% Reduction = -2.64
% Mortality
Avg.Reprod.
0.00
Control
25.25
Control
0.00
Treatment
2
25.92
Treatment
2
Control CV
15.672%
% control orgs
producing 3rd
brood
100%
PASS FAIL
Check One
pH
Control
Treatment 2
M D.O.
Control
Treatment'2
1st
sample
7.98
7.93
7.95
7.90
s
t
a
r
t
1st
1st sample 2nd sample
7.79
7.69
7.89
7.91
s
e t e
n a n
d r d
t
sample 1st sample
7.69
7.26
7.68
7.27
7.89
7.50
7.93
7.38
7.94
7.84
7.92
7.77
s
t
a
r
t
2nd
e
n
d
sample
7.84
7.24
7.80
7.05
LC50/Acute
Toxicity Test
(Mortality expressed
as %, combining
Complete This For Either Test.
Test Start Date: 11/05/08
Collection (Start) Date
Sample 1: 11/03/08 Sample 2: 11/06/08
Sample Type/Duration
Sample 1
Sample 2
Sample
replicates
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
. %
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
Grab Comp. Duration
X 24.0 hrs
X 24.0 hrs
D
I
L
U
T
1st
S
A
M
P
2nd
P/F
S
A
M
P
Hardness(mg/1)
Spec. Cond.(pmhos)
Chlorine(mg/1)
temp. at receipt(°C)
40
180
460
425
<0.1
<0.1
1.9
0.5
Concentration'
Mortality
LC50 = %
95% Confidence Limits
Method of Determination
Moving Average _ Probit
Spearman Karber Other -
Note: Please
Complete This
Section Also
start/end start/end
Control
pH
'I Organism Tested: Ceriodaphnia dubia
Duration(hrs):
Copied from DWQ form AT-1 (3/87) rev. 11/95 (DUBIA ver. 4.41)
High
Conc.
D.O.
n

Date: 08/13/08
-,Effluent Toxicity Report Form -
'nacility: TOWN OF FAIRMONT WWTP
)o ato Performing Test: MERITECH INC
X
gna
a re
x
Signature o
pork Order:
lri
i
Ar#
Respon
oratory Supervisor
arge
MAIL ORIGINAL TO:
_forth Carolina Ceriodaphnia
Chronic Pass/Fail Reproduction Toxicity Test
;ONTROL ORGANISMS 1
# Young Produced
Adult (L)ive (D)ead
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9- 10 11 12
14 18
L L
Effluent %: 2.2%
TREATMENT 2 ORGANISMS 1
16
L
19 18
L L
2 3 4 5
## Young Produced 1t20I16116117
Adult (L)ive (D)ead
Control
'Treatment 2
D.O.
Control
Treatment 2
LLLL
21
11
20120
16
16
19
L
19
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
18
14
18 20
L
1st sample 1st sample 2nd sample
8.04 8.23
8.07 7.97
s
t e
a n
✓ d
1st sample
7.46 7.35
7.48 7.24
r7.95 7.79
8.05 7.91
s
t
a
r
t
1st sample
e
n
d
7.42 7.22
7.41 7.36
8.01 7.85
8.01 7.89
s
t e
a n
✓ d
t
2nd sample
r7.68 7.10
7.62 7.13
LC50/Acute Toxicity Test
(Mortality expressed
%
96
as %,
combining
%
%
17
15 9
L D
Chronic Pass/Fail and Acute LC50
NPDES## : NC0086550 Pipe# :
County: ROBESON
Comments: Dilution Water Batch
##683, 684 & 685 Used
* PASSED: 2.43% Reduction *
Environmental Sciences Branch
Div. of Water Quality
N.C. DENR
1621 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1621
Chronic Test Results
Calculated t = 0.344
Tabular t = 2.508
% Reduction = 2.43
% Mortality
0.00
Control
8.33
Treatment 2
Control CV
15.677%
% control orgs
producing 3rd
brood
91.7%
Avg.Reprod.
17.17
Control
16.75
Treatment 2
PASS
FAIL
Check One
Complete This For Either Test
Test Start Date: 08/06/08
Collection (Start) Date
Sample 1: 08/04/08 Sample 2: 08/07/08
Sample Type/Duration
Grab Comp.
Sample 1 X
Sample 2 X
Duration
24.0 hrs
24.0 hrs
Hardness(mg/1)
Spec. Cond.(µmhos)
Chlorine(mg/1)
Sample temp. at receipt(°C)
replicates)
Concentration
Mortality
LC50 = %
95% Confidence Limits
% -- _-_
Method of Determination
Moving Average Probit
Spearman Karber Other
tart/end
D
I
L
U
T
44
182
1st
S
A
M
P
382
<0.1
1.2
Note: Please
Complete This
Section Also
Control
start/end
pH
IOrganism Tested: Ceriodaphnia dubia
Copied from DWQ form AT-1 (3/87) rev. 11/95 (DUBIA ver. 4.41)
Duration(hrs):
High
Conc.
D.O.
2nd
P/F
S
A
M
P
413
<0.1
0.3

Effluent Toxicity Report Form - Chronic Pass/Fail and Acute LC50 Date: 06/06/08
Facility: TOWN OF FAIRMONT WWTP
-aborator_ Perform' g Te d: MERITECH, INC
gna re of •pe t in Res onsib Charge
IX
NPDES#: NC0086550 Pipe#: County: ROBESON
Signature of La oratory Supervis
Comments: dilution water batch
#669 and 670 used in this test.
* PASSED: -6.05% Reduction *
Bork Order:
MAIL ORIGINAL TO:
-Llorth Carolina Ceriodaphnia .
Chronic Pass/Fail Reproduction Toxicity Test
Environmental Sciences Branch
Div. of Water Quality
N.C. DENR
1621 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1621
_:ONTROL ORGANISMS 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
# Young Produced
14
21
22
21
25
23
22
20
23
19
21
17
Adult (L) ive (D) ead
Effluent %: 2.2%
TREATMENT 2 ORGANISMS 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
# Young Produced
26
20
22
20
22
23
23
21
23
22
21
20
Adult (L)ive (D)ead
Chronic Test Results
Calculated t = -1.271
Tabular t = 2.508
% Reduction = -6.05
% Mortality
Avg.Reprod.
0.00
Control
20.67
Control
0.00
Treatment 2
21.92
Treatment
2
Control CV
14.195%
% control orgs
producing 3rd
brood
91.7%
PASS FAIL
Check One
- pH
Control
'Treatment 2
D.O.
Control
--Treatment 2
lst sample 1st sample 2nd sample
7.95
7.88
7.95
7.78
7.94
7.95
7.94
7.95
8.00
7.91
7.95
7.94
s s s
t e t e t e
a n a n a n
✓ d r d r d
t t t
1st sample 1st sample 2nd sample
7.50
7.02
7.35
6.97
7.35
6.92
7.39
6.99
7.55
6.98
7.51
7.10
LC50/Acute Toxicity Test
I(Mortality expressed
Complete This For Either Test
Test Start Date: 05/30/08
Collection (Start) Date
Sample 1: 05/28/08 Sample 2: 06/02/08
Sample Type/Duration 2nd
lst P/F
Grab Comp. Duration D
I S S
Sample 1 X 24 hrs L A A
U M M
Sample 2 X 24 hrs T P P
Hardness(mg/1)
Spec. Cond.(µmhos)
Chlorine(mg/1)
Sample temp. at receipt(°C)
40
168
345
390
<0.1
<0.1
0.7
0.8
as % combining replicates)
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
'',,
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
Concentration
Mortality
LC50 = %
95% Confidence Limits
--
Method of Determination
Moving Average - Probit
Spearman Karber Other
start/end
Note: Please
Complete This
Section Also
start/end
Control
High
O,_ , r,
pH
Organism Tested: Ceriodaphnia dubia
Duration(hrs):
D.O.
Copied from DWQ form AT-1 (3/87) rev. 11/95 (DUBIA ver. 4.41)

Effluent Toxicity Report Form - Chronic Pass/Fail and Acute LC50 Date: 02/15/08
Facility: TOWN OF FAIRMONT WWTP
Laboratory Performing Test: MERITECH, INC
,{ ilk` �; �W
Sign o +. in Responsible C age
Signature of Laboratory Supervisor
NPDES#: NC0086550 Pipe#: County: ROBESON
Comments: Dilution Water Batch
#644 & 645 Used
* PASSED: -3.79% Reduction *
Work Order:
MAIL ORIGINAL TO:
North Carolina Ceriodaphnia
Chronic Pass/Fail Reproduction Toxicity Test
CONTROL ORGANISMS
Environmental Sciences Branch
Div. of Water Quality
N.C. DENR
1621 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1621
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
# Young Produced
27
25
25
22
25
23
17
25
25
24
24
28
Adult (L)ive (D)ead
Effluent %: 2.2%
TREATMENT 2 ORGANISMS 1
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
# Young Produced
27
23
26
23
27
25
25
21
25
25
25
29
Adult (L) ive (D) ead
L
Chronic Test Results
Calculated t = -0.915
Tabular t = 2.508
% Reduction = -3.79
% Mortality
Avg.Reprod.
0.00
Control
24.17
Control
0.00
Treatment
2
25.08
Treatment
2
Control CV
11.412%
% control orgs
producing 3rd
brood
100%
PASS FAIL
Check One
pH
Control
Treatment 2
D.O.
Control
Treatment 2
1st sample
8.02
7.99
8.01
7.94
s
t
a
r
t
1st sample
e
n
d
7.88
7.56
7.79
7.75
1st sample 2nd sample
7.94
7.96
7.95
7.98
s
t
a
r
t
1st
8.05
7.83
8.04
7.92
s
e t
n a
d r
t
sample 2nd sample
7.75
7.47
7.90
7.60
e
n
d
7.25
7.50
7.50
7.47
LC50/Acute Toxicity Test
(Mortality expressed as %, combining replicates
Complete This For Either Test
Test Start Date: 02/06/08
Collection (Start) Date
Sample 1: 02/04/08 Sample 2: 02/07/08
Sample Type/Duration 2nd
1st P/F
Grab Comp. Duration D
I S S
Sample 1 X 24 hrs L A A
U M M
Sample 2 X 24 hrs T P P
Hardness(mg/1)
Spec. Cond.(µmhos)
Chlorine(mg/1)
Sample temp. at receipt(°C)
40
183
352
389
<0.1
<0.1
0.3
0.6
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
Concentration
Mortality
LC50
95% Confidence Limits
% --
Method of Determination
Moving Average _ Probit
Spearman Karber _ Other
start/end
Note: Please
Complete This
Section Also
start
end
Control
High
r,,,,,.
pH
Organism Tested:
Ceriodaphnia dubia
Duration(hrs):
Copied from DWQ form AT-1 (3/87)
rev. 11/95 (DUBIA ver. 4.41)
D.O.

E•.fluent Toxicity Report Form - Chronic Pass/Fail and Acute LC50 Date: 11/15/07
- Facility: TOWN OF FAIRMONT WWTP
Laboratory Performing Test: MERITECH. TNC
Sign tu
IX
NPDES#: NC0086550 Pipe#:
Responsible zarge
' Signature of Laboratory Supervisor
County: ROBESON
Comments: Dilution Water Batch
#624 & 625 Used
* PASSED: 6.69% Reduction *
__"iork Order:
MAIL ORIGINAL TO:
forth Carolina Ceriodaphnia
Chronic Pass/Fail Reproduction Toxicity Test
Environmental Sciences Branch
Div. of Water Quality
N.C. DENR
1621 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1621
'ONTROL ORGANISMS 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
# Young Produced
24
25
22
22
22
22
22
23
25
22
16
24
Adult (L)ive (D)ead
sffluent %: 2.2%
TREATMENT 2 ORGANISMS 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
# Young Produced
21
22
24
21
14
24
22
18
20
18
23
24
Adult (L) ive (D) ead
Chronic Test Results
Calculated t =
Tabular t =
% Reduction = 6.69
% Mortality
Avg.Reprod.
0.00
Control
22.42
Control
0.00
Treatment 2
20.92
Treatment
2
Control CV
10.498%
% control orgs
producing 3rd
brood
100%
PASS FAIL
Check One
__LVLZ
1st sample
Control
!treatment 2
Control
Treatment 2
8.03
7.95
8.03
7.98
s
t
a
r
t
1st sample
e
n
d
7.98
7.55
8.03
7.46
1st sample 2nd sample
7.98
7.88
8.00
7.97
8.00
8.04
7.90
8.08
s s
t e t
a n a
✓ d r
t t
1st sample 2nd sample
7.94
7.66
7.91
7.69
e
n
d
7.92
7.29
7.97
7.51
LC50/Acute Toxicity Test
(Mortality expressed as %, combining replicates
Complete This For Either Test
Test Start Date: 11/07/07
Collection (Start) Date
Sample 1: 11/05/07 Sample 2: 11/08/07
Sample Type/Duration 2nd
1st P/F
Grab Comp. Duration D
I S S
Sample 1 X 24.0 hrs L A A
U M M
Sample 2 X 24.0 hrs T P P
Hardness(mg/1)
Spec. Cond.(µmhos)
Chlorine(mg/1)
Sample temp. at receipt(°C)
48
175
589
577
<0.1
<0.1
0.4
2.3
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
LC50 =
95% Confidence Limits
Concentration
Mortality
Method of Determination
Moving Average Probit _
Spearman Karber _ Other
start/end
Note: Please
Complete This
Section Also
start/end
Control
High
r,,,
pH
- - irganism Tested: Ceriodaphnia dubia
Duration(hrs):
Copied from DWQ form AT-1 (3/87) rev. 11/95 (DUBIA ver. 4.41)
D.O.

Effluent Toxicity Report Form - Chronic Pass/Fail and Acute LC50 Date: 08/16/07
Facility: TOWN OF FAIRMONT WWTP
Labo ory ;erforming Test: MRITECH, INC
NPDES#: NC0086550 Pipe#: County: ROBESON
Comments: DILUTION WATER BATCH
#608, 609, AND 610 USED FOR THIS
TEST
* PASSED: 18.21% Reduction *
Work Order:
MAIL ORIGINAL TO:
North Carolina Ceriodaphnia
Chronic Pass/Fail Reproduction Toxicity Test
CONTROL ORGANISMS
Environmental Sciences Branch
Div. of Water Quality
N.C. DENR
1621 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1621
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
# Young Produced
23
22
25
26
28
26
22
20
27
23
24
25
Adult (L)ive (D)ead
Effluent %: 2.2%
TREATMENT 2 ORGANISMS 1
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
# Young Produced
12
21
19
23
18
21
22
22
14
26
21
19
Adult (L)ive (D)ead
Chronic Test Results
Calculated t = 3.406
Tabular t = 2.508
% Reduction = 18.21
% Mortality
Avg.Reprod.
0.00
Control
24.25
Control
0.00
Treatment 2
19.83
Treatment
2
Control CV
9.651%
% control orgs
producing 3rd
brood
91.7%
PASS FAIL
Check One
pH
Control
Treatment 2
D.O.
Control
Treatment 2
1st sample
7.98
7.89
7.86
7.98
s
t e
a n
r d
t
1st sample
7.76
7.30
7.81
7.41
1st sample 2nd sample
7.90
8.12
8.01
7.96
s
t
a
r
t
lst sample
e
n
d
7.75
7.50
7.86
7.60
8.11
7.92
8.02
7.78
s
t
a
r
t
2nd sample
e
n
d
7.91
7.60
7.90
7.30
LC50/Acute Toxicity Test
(Mortality expressed as % combining replicates
Complete This For Either Test
Test Start Date: 08/08/07
Collection (Start) Date
Sample 1: 08/06/07 Sample 2: 08/09/07
Sample Type/Duration
Sample 1
Sample 2
Grab
Comp.
Duration
24 hrs
24 hrs
D
I
L
U
T
2nd
lst P/F
S
A
M
P
S
A
M
P
Hardness(mg/1)
Spec. Cond.(µmhos)
Chlorine(mg/1)
Sample temp. at receipt(°C)
46
172
530
519
<0.1
<0.1
0.4
1.0
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
Concentration
Mortality
LC50 =
95% Confidence Limits
--
Method of Determination
Moving Average Probit _
Spearman Karber _ Other
start/end
Note: Please
Complete This
Section Also
start/end
Control
High
r,,,
pH
Organism Tested: Ceriodaphnia dubia
Duration(hrs):
Copied from DWQ form AT-1 (3/87) rev. 11/95 (DUBIA ver. 4.41)
D.O.

Effluent Toxicity Report Form - Chronic Pass/Fail and Acute LC50
Date: 05/17/07
Facility: TOWN OF FAIRMONT
NPDES#:
NC0086550 Pipe#: County: ROBESON
Laboratory Performing Test: MERITECH LABS, INC.
X
Signa ure of Opera or onsi e Char e
Signature of Laboratory Supe visor
Comments: "Infant" mortality
observed in sample cups #6 and
#12.
* PASSED: -3.18% Reduction *
- 1 Work Order:
MAIL ORIGINAL TO:
North Carolina Ceriodaphnia
Chronic Pass/Fail Reproduction Toxicity Test
CONTROL ORGANISMS
Environmental Sciences Branch
Div. of Water Quality
N.C. DENR
1621 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1621
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
# Young Produced
18
25
26
24
26
24
20
26
24
24
20
26
Adult (L)ive (D)ead
Effluent %: 2.2%
TREATMENT 2 ORGANISMS 1
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
# Young Produced
26
22
30
28
14
21
25
33
28
26
24
15
Adult (L)ive (D)ead
Chronic Test Results
Calculated t = -0.414
Tabular t = 2.508
% Reduction = -3.18
% Mortality
Avg.Reprod.
0.00
Control
23.58
Control
8.33
Treatment 2
24.33
Treatment
2
Control CV
11.642%
% control orgs
producing 3rd
brood
100%
PASS FAIL
Check One
_'pH
Control
-Treatment 2
D.O.
Control
Treatment 2
1st sample 1st sample
7.94
7.88
7.97
7.83
s
t
a
r
t
1st sample
e
n
d
7.74
7.49
7.76
7.00
7.94
7.97
8.04
7.91
s
t
a
r
t
1st
2nd sample
7.96
8.00
8.01
8.08
s
e t e
n a n
d r d
t
sample 2nd sample
7.73
7.70
7.60
7.43
7.88
7.45
7.92
7.51
LC50/Acute Toxicity Test
(Mortality expressed as %,
combining
replicates
Complete This For Either Test
Test Start Date: 05/09/07
Collection (Start) Date
Sample 1: 05/07/07 Sample 2: 05/10/07
Sample Type/Duration 2nd
1st P/F
Grab Comp. Duration D
I S S
Sample 1 X 24 hrs L A A
U M M
Sample 2 X 24 hrs T P P
Hardness(mg/1)
Spec. Cond.(µmhos)
Chlorine(mg/1)
Sample temp. at receipt(°C)
44
180
519
390
<0.1
<0.1
0.2
0.6
%
%
%
%
%
%
o
%
%
%
;
u
o
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
Concentration
Mortality
LC50 =
95% Confidence Limits
Method of Determination
Moving Average _ Probit _
Spearman Karber Other
start/end
Note: Please
Complete This
Section Also
start/end
Control
High
rnnr
pH
Organism Tested: Ceriodaphnia dubia
Duration(hrs):
Copied from DWQ form AT-1 (3/87) rev. 11/95 (DUBIA ver. 4.41)
D.O.

Effluent Toxicity Report Form - Chronic Pass/Fail and Acute LC50
Date: 02/21/07
-`Facility: TOWN OF FAIRMONT
Laboratory Performing Test: MERITECH LABS, INC.
Y n�
gn re ofi. espor}sible Charge
Signature o La oratory Supervisor
NPDES#: NC0086550 Pipe#: County: ROBESON
Comments:
* PASSED: -1.93% Reduction *
--Work Order:
MAIL ORIGINAL TO:
4orth Carolina Ceriodaphnia
Chronic Pass/Fail Reproduction Toxicity Test
- -CONTROL ORGANISMS
Environmental Sciences Branch
Div. of Water Quality
N.C. DENR
1621 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1621
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
# Young Produced
18
15
15
15
16
20
17
18
22
15
15
21
Adult (L) ive (D) ead
-Effluent %: 2.2%
TREATMENT 2 ORGANISMS 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
# Young Produced
19
11
19
15
18
21
16
18
20
18
19
17
Adult (L)ive (D)ead
Chronic Test Results
Calculated t = -0.314
Tabular t = 2.508
% Reduction = -1.93
% Mortality
Avg.Reprod.
0.00
Control
17.25
Control
0.00
Treatment 2
17.58
Treatment
2
Control CV
14.857%
% control orgs
producing 3rd
brood
91.7%
PASS FAIL
X
Check One
H
Control
- Treatment 2
- D.O.
Control
- Treatment 2
lst sample 1st sample 2nd sample
8.04
8.02
7.95
8.07
7.98
8.12
7.98
7.95
7.96
7.97
7.92
8.01
s s s
t e t e t e
a n a n a n
✓ d r d r d
t t t
1st sample lst sample 2nd sample
8.50
8.20
8.52
8.18
8.50
8.35
8.53
8.16
8.48
8.03
8.45
8.20
LC50/Acute Toxicity Test
(Mortality expressed as %
combining replicates
Complete This For Either Test
Test Start Date: 02/07/07
Collection (Start) Date
Sample 1: 02/05/07 Sample 2: 02/08/07
Sample Type/Duration 2nd
1st P/F
Grab Comp. Duration D
I S S
Sample 1 X 24 hrs L A A
U M M
Sample 2 X 24 hrs T P P
Hardness (mg/1)
Spec. Cond.(µmhos)
Chlorine (mg/1)
Sample temp. at receipt(°C)
40
173
191
235
<0.1
<0.1
0.8
0.5
96
6
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
.
%
5
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
Concentration
Mortality
LC50 =
95% Confidence Limits
%
Method of Determination
Moving Average _ Probit _
Spearman Karber Other
start/end
Note: Please
Complete This
Section Also
start/end
Control
High
r,,,,-.
pH
Organism Tested: Ceriodaphnia dubia Duration(hrs):
Copied from DWQ form AT-1 (3/87).rev. 11/95 (DUBIA ver. 4.41)
D.O.

.at Toxicity Report Form - Chronic Pass/Fail and Acute LC50
Date: 11/27/06
.ty: TOWN OF FAIRMONT
NPDES#: NC0086550 Pipe#:
County: ROBESON
.0oratory Performing Test:
/of Op
IX ✓/
Signature of�Laboratory Supervisor
MERITECH LABS, INC.
Responsible Charge
Comments: ASTERISK (*) DENOTES
MISSING ORGANISM IN THE TEST
CONCENTRAION CUP 5
* PASSED: 1.42% Reduction *
Work Order:
MAIL ORIGINAL TO:
-forth Carolina Ceriodaphnia
Chronic Pass/Fail Reproduction Toxicity Test
CONTROL ORGANISMS
Environmental Sciences Branch
Div. of Water Quality
N.C. DENR
1621 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1621
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
# Young Produced
25
26
21
26
22
28
28
23
24
26
26
26
Adult (L) ive (D) ead
Effluent %: 2.2%
TREATMENT 2 ORGANISMS 1
2 3 4 5. 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
# Young Produced
20
28
26
31
0
17
24
25
25
29
23
24
Adult (L) ive (D) ead
*
Chronic Test Results
Calculated t = 0.270
Tabular t = 2.518
% Reduction = 1.42
% Mortality
Avg.Reprod.
0.00
Control
25.08
Control
0.00
Treatment 2
24.73
Treatment
2
Control CV
8.744%
% control orgs
producing 3rd
brood
100%
PASS FAIL
Check One
Control
---,Treatment 2
D.O.
Control
!Treatment 2
1st sample
8.04
7.99
7.98
7.99
s
t
a
r
t
lst sample
e
n
d
7.99
7.66
7.99
7.81
1st sample 2nd sample
8.18
8.04
8.05
8.10
s
t
a
r
t
lst
8.04
7.98
8.09
8.06
s
e t e
n a n
d r d
t
sample 2nd sample
7.91
7.73
7.96
7.78
7.88
7.70
8.09
7.78
LC50/Acute Toxicity Test
(Mortality expressed as %
combining replicates
Complete This For Either Test
Test Start Date: 11/15/06
Collection (Start) Date
Sample 1: 11/30/6 Sample 2: 11/16/06
Sample Type/Duration
Sample 1
Sample 2
Grab
Comp.
Duration
X 24 hrs
X 24 hrs
D
I
L
U
T
1st
S
A
M
P
2nd
P/F
S
A
M
P
Hardness (mg/1)
Spec. Cond.(µmhos)
Chlorine (mg/1)
Sample temp. at receipt(°C)
44
168
282
302
<0.1
<0.1
0.1
0.7
5
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
96
%
9
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
Concentration
Mortality
LCSO =
95% Confidence Limits
--
Method of Determination
Moving Average _ Probit _
Spearman Karber - Other
start/end
Note: Please
Complete This
Section Also
start/end
Control
High
('ran n
pH
Organism Tested: Ceriodaphnia dubia
Duration(hrs):
Copied from DWQ form AT-1 (3/87) rev. 11/95 (DUBIA ver. 4.41)
D.O.

1K; IL
Effluent Toxicity Report Form - Chronic Pass/Fail and Acute LC50
Date: 08/17/06
Facility: TOWN OF FAIRMONT
NPDES#: NC0086550 Pipe#: County: ROBESON
Labora orv_
\\.
erforming estirITECH LABS INC.
Sig a
e of 0 or y.espo sible Charge
of Laboratory Supervisor
Signature
Comments:
* PASSED: 7.82% Reduction *
_Work Order:
MAIL ORIGINAL TO:
---;North Carolina Ceriodaphnia
Chronic Pass/Fail Reproduction Toxicity Test
Environmental Sciences Branch
Div. of Water Quality
N.C. DENR
1621 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1621
- CONTROL ORGANISMS 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
# Young Produced
34
30
32
34
29
32
33
34
26
19
32
36
Adult (L)ive (D)ead
-,Effluent %: 2.2%
,TREATMENT 2 ORGANISMS 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
# Young Produced
28
30
25
33
30
29
16
30
33
33
29
26
Adult (L)ive (D)ead
Chronic Test Results
Calculated t =
Tabular t =
% Reduction = 7.82
% Mortality
Avg.Reprod.
0.00
Control
30.92
Control
0.00
Treatment 2
28.50
Treatment
2
Control CV
14.884%
% control orgs
producing 3rd
brood
91.7%
PASS FAIL
Check One
Control
- Treatment 2
D.O.
+ Control
Treatment 2
1st sample 1st sample 2nd sample
8.00
7.98
8.02
8.05
8.05
8.16
8.06
8.08
7.98
8.20
7.99
8.08
s s s
t e t e t e
a n a n a n
✓ d r d r d
t t t
1st sample 1st sample 2nd sample
7.98
7.65
7.92
7 .75
8.03
7.98
8.07
7.89
7.85
7.71
7.95
7.80
LC50/Acute Toxicity Test
(Mortality expressed as %
combining replicates
Complete This For Either Test
Test Start Date: 08/09/06
Collection (Start) Date
Sample 1: 08/07/06 Sample 2: 08/10/06
Sample Type/Duration 2nd
1st P/F
Grab Comp. Duration D
I S S
Sample 1 X 24 hrs L A A
U M M
Sample 2 X 24 hrs T P P
Hardness(mg/1)
Spec. Cond.(µmhos)
Chlorine(mg/1)
Sample temp. at receipt(°C)
42
165
363
379
<0.1
<0.1
1.2
0.8
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
s
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
Concentration
Mortality
LC50 = °s
95% Contidence Limits
%
Method of Determination
Moving Average Probit
Spearman Karber Other
start/end
Note: Please
Complete This
Section Also
start/end
Control
High
pH
IOrganism Tested: Ceriodaphnia dubia Duration(hrs):
Copied from DWQ form AT-1 (3/87) rev. 11/95 (DUBIA ver. 4.41)
D.O.

Effluent Toxicity Report Form Chronic Pass/Fail and Acute LC50' Date: 05/10/06
1Fac i r'i ty : TOWN OF FAIRMONT
(Laboratory Performing Test: MERITECH LABS, INC.
1111,
Si $ re �f a or in Responsible Charge
Ix
Signature of Laboratory Supervisor
NPDES#: NC0086550 Pipe#: County: ROBESON
Comments:
* PASSED: 4.14% Reduction *
Work Order:
MAIL ORIGINAL TO:
__North Carolina Ceriodaphnia
Chronic Pass/Fail Reproduction Toxicity Test
Environmental Sciences Branch
Div. of Water Quality
N.C. DENR
1621 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1621
CONTROL ORGANISMS 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
# Young Produced
26
25
24
25
27
27
23
28
28
28
24
29
Adult (L)ive (D)ead
Effluent %: 2.2%
-TREATMENT 2 ORGANISMS 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
# Young Produced
24
25
25
25
31
23
20
29
26
25
22
26
Adult (L)ive (D)ead
Chronic Test Results
Calculated t = 1.073
Tabular t = 2.508
% Reduction = 4.14
% Mortality
Avg.Reprod.
0.00
Control
26.17
Control
0.00
Treatment 2
25.08
Treatment
2
Control CV
7.438%
% control orgs
producing 3rd
brood
100%
PASS FAIL
Check One
Control
Treatment 2
D.O.
Control
Treatment 2
1st sample 1st sample 2nd sample
8.07
8.11
8.04
8.18
8.13
8.09
8.05
8.16
8.19
8.03
8.17
7.98
s s s
t e t e t e
a n a n a n
r d r d r d
t t t
1st sample 1st sample 2nd sample
8.00
7.55
8.03
7.56
7.83
7.80
7.77
7.82
8.08
7.85
8.10
7.71
LC50/Acute Toxicity Test
(Mortality expressed as %
combining replicates
Complete This For Either Test
Test Start Date: 05/03/06
Collection (Start) Date
Sample 1: 05/01/06 Sample 2: 05 A/06
Sample Type/Duration 2nd
1st P/F
Grab Comp. Duration
S S
Sample 1 X 24 hrs L A A
U M M
Sample 2 X 24 hrs T P P
Hardness(mg/1)
Spec. Cond.(µmhos)
Chlorine(mg/1)
Sample temp. at receipt(°C)
42
170
370
371
<0.1
<0.1
0.3
0.7
°
-
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%.
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
Concentration
Mortality
LC50 = %
95% Confidence Limits
--
Method of Determination
Moving Average Probit _
Spearman Karber _ Other
start/end
Note: Please
Complete This
Section Also
start/end
Control
High
reran r
pH
Organism Tested: Ceriodaphnia dubia
Duration(hrs):
Copied from DWQ form AT-1 (3/87) rev. 11/95 (DUBIA ver. 4.41)
D.O.

EffT r* Toxicity Report Form - Chronic Pass/Fail and Acute LC50
Date: 02/15/06
Facility: TOWN OF FAIRMONT
Laboratory Performing Test: MERITECH LABS,
X �tl%ti �ti
Signat
e of Opevt.gg in Responsible
Signature
of Laboraeor Supervisor
NPDES#:
INC.
Charge
NC0086550 Pipe#: County: ROBESON
Comments:
* PASSED: -6.25% Reduction *
Work Order:
MAIL ORIGINAL TO:
,North Carolina Ceriodaphnia
Chronic Pass/Fail Reproduction Toxicity Test
CONTROL ORGANISMS
Environmental Sciences Branch
Div. of Water Quality
N.C. DENR
1621 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1621
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
# Young Produced
17
26
24
25
24
24
22
24
24
20
21
21
Adult (L)ive (D)ead
-,,Effluent %: 2.2%
,TREATMENT 2 ORGANISMS 1
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
# Young Produced
22
22
25
18
26
27
30
26
22
22
23
26
Adult (L)ive (D)ead
Chronic Test Results
Calculated t = -1.208
Tabular t = 2.508
% Reduction = -6.25
% Mortality
Avg.Reprod.
0.00
Control
22.67
Control
0.00
Treatment 2
24.08
Treatment
2
Control CV
11.182W
% control orgs
producing 3rd
brood
100%
PASS FAIL
Check One
_,' pH
Control
,Treatment 2
--, D.O.
Control
Treatment 2
1st sample
7.90
7.98
7.82
7.88
s
t
a
r
t
1st sample
e
n
d
7.98
7.90
8.05
7.30
1st sample 2nd sample
7.96
8.00
7.90
7.95
s
t
a
r
t
1st
7.97
7.92
7.85
7.86
s
e t e
n a n
d r d
t
sample 2nd sample
8.05
7.95
7.93
7.83
8.06
7.65
8.10
7.61
LC50/Acute Toxicity
(Mortality expressed
Test
as %, combining
Complete This For Either Test
Test Start Date: 02/08/06
Collection (Start) Date
Sample 1: 02/06/06 Sample 2: 02/09/06
Sample Type/Duration
Sample
Sample
Sample
replicates
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
1
2
Grab
Comp.
Duration
X 24 hrs
X 24 hrs
D
I
L
U
T
2nd
1st P/F
S S
A A
M M
P P
Hardness(mg/1)
Spec. Cond.(µmhos)
Chlorine(mg/1)
temp. at receipt(°C)
48
190
397
240
<0.1
<0.1
1.4
0.6
Concentration
Mortality
LC50 = %
95% Confidence Limits
% --
Method of Determination
Moving Average _ Probit
Spearman Karber Other -
start/end
Note: Please
Complete This
Section Also
start/end
Control
High
C'nnr
pH
Organism Tested: Ceriodaphnia dubia
Duration(hrs):
Copied from DWQ form AT-1 (3/87) rev. 11/95 (DUBIA ver. 4.41)
D.O.

Effluent Toxicity Report Form - Chronic Pass/Fail and Acute LC50 Date: 11/25/05
Facility: TOWN OF FAIRBLUFF
NPDES#: NC0020729 Pipe#: County: COLUMBUS
Labor-y ,C erforming Test: MERITECH LABS, INC.
nett e or C e atorLL/Responsible Charge
of Laboratory' upervisor
Signature
Comments:
* PASSED: 2.79% Reduction *
- Work Order:
MAIL ORIGINAL TO:
North Carolina Ceriodaphnia
Chronic Pass/Fail Reproduction Toxicity Test
Environmental Sciences Branch
Div. of Water Quality
N.C. DENR
1621 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1621
--. CONTROL ORGANISMS 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
# Young Produced
25 22 21 20 22 16 23 15 28 19 18 22
Adult (L)ive (D)ead
Effluent %: 0.26%
TREATMENT 2 ORGANISMS 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
## Young Produced
26
20
17
22
19
22
20
18
18
18
22
22
Adult (L)ive (D)ead
Chronic Test Results
Calculated t = 0.452
Tabular t = 2.508
% Reduction = 2.79
% Mortality
Avg.Reprod.
0.00
Control
20.92
Control
0.00
Treatment 2
20.33
Treatment 2
Control CV
17.472%
% control orgs
producing 3rd
brood
83.3%
PASS FAIL
Check One
pH
Control
Treatment 2
D.O.
Control
Treatment 2
1st sample 1st sample 2nd sample
7.80
7.77
7.74
7.75
s
t
a
r
t
lst sample
e
n
d
7.82
7.83
7.94
7.68
7.78
7.90
7.80
7.84
7.87
7.90
7.84
7.70
s s
t e t e
a n a n
✓ d r d
t t
lst sample 2nd sample
8.05
7.63
7.78
7.63
7.80
7.70
7.73
7.62
LC50/Acute Toxicity Test
(Mortality expressed as %, combining replicates
Complete This For Either Test
Test Start Date: 11/16/05
Collection (Start) Date
Sample 1: 11/14/05 Sample 2: 11/17/05
Sample Type/Duration
Sample 1
Sample 2
Grab
Comp.
Duration
24 hrs
24 hrs
2nd
1st P/F
D
I S S
L A A
U M M
T P P
Hardness(mg/1)
Spec. Cond.(µmhos)
Chlorine (mg/1)
Sample temp. at receipt(°C)
46
175
590
480
<0.1
<0.1
0.5
0.4
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
Concentration
Mortality
LC50 =
95% Confidence Limits
% --
Method of Determination
Moving Average _ Probit
Spearman Karber _ Other
start/end
Note: Please
Complete This
Section Also
start/end
Control
High
rr,,,,
pH
Organism Tested: Ceriodaphnia dubia Duration(hrs):
Copied from DWQ form AT-1 (3/87) rev. 11/95 (DUBIA ver. 4.41)
D.O.

Attachment 4
Map of River Outfall

-
- -
at
_
. a ozQne
-'�
..
_
-
_
!
! f
�i`�'`
ty
..3 1.-Q _ .
- Y`
- -
jI •[lL r
+ f .
a_ _ ....fi •.r •;.du
+_ 121Frr ... •,� • ...
f ..de 1.- •..k- — . --
r 4. - -: H_ti.
y �LQ7i: -4' •iFP•
/6 •�' 1_, _t'�'•
--y4•. _ • '•
V.
? i r �'
mo:
i
- __ _
-•*• _-• _°- -
r -: - J. ..aj.-
• •i ' - ' pli• �7h�
s - - -.•_
' 1�.'S�;x^.a.r'. _
— �Y".-sue -
•
;�;#1 -IA- •i'"-- la,
.,•.44` -
....-•Y% •''' .- .84-
- ram- -.+.. - i.' -,8•
i}L yam• 'aW ®..
—' ` . r
-, -4-
. f -1�'4 rµ"'= .yam
Y +, J;.. ' s
,
-.0- - ''
-!+•
_ 4 ..z
.'.'.- -?•.
.'_ ,• to _
fir`
•' "-"f7
• 07'1`
ti- 4.-
'NJ' _•if-
-- rim_ .:_
'r?`•- il.
— -,ri-
--ds.•-
--a
.—
- 1-
(,, ce.
`P
�4'' -'
- a
•
.-- ..•-.— ...-.":.---. ;
v-. -,e _ 1.. J . .-Lk.. •ems"• s `•:-,
_ aW. _4c_ s. —0• ''-. _ r
~ --� � ' � �IiN. - ,. ��' --- - - ...
1e - YY n gam- - l
' • • sr '41...cam •IcHc '• .�r
-•-;.1+r - ' '
_;y k. ., &•• sti"' 1,f.
y.. c•1*_ .fir ^o
•
-4.41` '_ •"2• - emu. �...''.'
`�= ,'x-
• -W°' .�.--�,{- :' :• t- _
-4- i .._ -
_--.Ps- ,)
-ri..
�h - 1,\ , a ��' -• 1 �h
-f,=r , •r F t . .
..
7l
.y t
i
fta0
j'
c
1
., ;
it
+
J 45 S
i
i
''.
,r,`;
:
i4-
�_
•
=
` .
• t
f
‘..,
{:
> . ` J
• -
tLT - qa-
-
it
1
Jam,
0
p -� 0
�..�
—
__
` ,�
y i
er
•I
�k,s-.
�'•4 L•
4r -,a�„
y..
r�
1
+:
c� •
1Boardman J
•
(ixx
`� .
•
p,4
'�. qea�
J•
-
•wJC
I''
�•V
rd
fi
r `
Cern
•�'p,
..
.l'
1.
•, i
® r
�
�- - I
-
•,'�
'I /
•
No
,.._._,
%
r- ±"
...
:� tea. •
'.
I C
•4 r ,
-
tom
-W%•-'
i��
";
,
I
41,
!
ry
• 4 ..
=-
'u^
'.YY. �k`�.
- tu„ ��
.. Jt �� .....
' al.... (
�} -
..
V '''•. w-_ _
''•
/
•-
'y'at
..fit._ -6' -
.-.
... . ,
am _.
,b=l
_ yi:.
_r,
-_ -
y..
.. rj • _ -
- 5-"S. '
-
_
"
.,.
_ .. ..
6
\
- .tile
• - 7
0.3 0.6 0.9
1.2
1.5 km
0
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 mi
Map center is 34° 26' 33"N, 78° 57' 37"W (WGS84/NAD83)
Evergreen quadrangle
Projection is UTM Zone 17 NAD83-Datum
M=-8.219
G=1.154
http://www.topozone.com/print.asp?z=17&n=3813122.9999527&e=6873 86.000021121&s... 1/21/2004

Attachment 5
Treatment Plant Location Map &
Process Layout

L UIJJL4U11G - i 11G vY Gu J: i vpu i apiu iviap
ramp1Vi1
Clrik*Ve
White Oak
-, Swaimp
�'�- .+1.•
-r'-iM--
- —!
- , ... -+'_ `
... — . , ,
5
r I
\
,i •t'
ij' ,
�•�� I i
�' 'aw
. _
f-•,
. '
.
,; . a4,,. — .,•
.-— ^- —.�+i..
4
i ' 'v��i.. '_ ~ L •' 1t�s -
"�= '�` �,-_ -6- ,,:. -Nit
.:� ., .— -},.,
-- .LY. ap _l
..-_.:: �.r-
• t—_}�,='
1"-,"" •w-.__ -4.__
_4, �'- — --,_,,.— -4.),,
- MY'.•1 ,_�` 1,
y Jllti ..•
�-,�`
„•.
-
[
-qa.`_,
— . a
;_"a`
- dIy!
W
Y
oGsf
.-m
.. ..
'�...:
-FP `_�•ye-•
_ -`. -,i. -.e_a di. .• _
— -'i=
,b`--YH..
-
Vl
''-1
y [�'y�q
-lam' '- .t�,�
- -ale- tl.,"-
'�..
•.r
•
r 1
�`
4U4
.. .- i +
,J.i
G'•Cr ,r 1 ,�
. 1 j
- T
r.... ,'' . - / J
- -, ...`• — y +.- -
/J "y
.
— � r
~'-�
.cam _.sb -36
-.
.- �'/�
i
is i �,
.- — -
o ,
r, agi , 2
p Location
— ' Y -,4-
1
+
•_
J 1
i�—
- _�.
1\-M��
�'
�.0
'c
/'.
�,•i. rely\5. N^'_^
-�
r ' °�jT_...1�
/.•'
�' }''
_
p f "'.tea,-
-'� -.W �
rp
1
s
i%y�a
J+ Y-�.1 {^~
1*•••-f'
- N
u.' .
off/
'
:•
—." ..� t
•L� —
'.w. —:'- -_
'_. ;„„. ..u.. Y_ 44..♦
,..,
,Gri .a
q• 'th- _ {(
0 0.3 0.6 0.9 1.2
1.5 km
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 mi
Map center is UTM 17 686451E 3813142N (WGS84/NAD83)
Evergreen quadrangle
Projection is UTM Zone 17 NAD83 Datum
M=-8.212
G=1.148
http://www.topozone. com/print. asp?z=17&n=3 813141.99995667&e=686451.000020399&... 1/21/2004

J -
SLUDGE
LOADING STATION
GENERATOR
HEADWOR
BLOWERR
LABORATORY
AND
OPERATIONS BUILDING
SCUM BOX
ACCE55
UDDER
CHLORINE CONTACT
rBASIN 1
1
CLARIFIER /1
�itl
DIGESTER #i EQUIPMENT LAYOUT PLAN
CLARIFIER j2
SCUM BDX
ACCESS
UDDER
GRAPMC SCALE:

100.00 -
98m -
96.00 -
94.00
92m
90.00
68.00
ee.00
84.00
8200
60m
76m
98.88
INFLUENT
FORCE MN
6W SCREEN
101 00
PARSHALL FLUME
96.50
98.00
HEADY.QQKS
WAS. DSCFMFBC
rE� 95.00
96.00
94.00 -
92.00 -
90.00 -
88.00 -
86.00 -
84.00 -
62.00 -
80m -
711.00
90.00 I&
IQ
RA.S.• 96DISCMARGE
.75
00
LIFT DISCHARGE
. 94.75
WEIR GATE
INJECTION CHLORINE
BASINS 1 & 2
e. INORWLLLY =DSEO)
96m
WEIR GATE
BETWEEN CHLORINE
INJECTION BASINS 1 d 2
9.00
TIN ERf LY cw500)
GATE ELEV. 9f'� 94 50
. 95.50 T
GATE ELEV.
. *94.03
PI U X
CHANNFI
8.00
AERATION
Deaui5
±T4.03
93T50
EFFL PIPE
166ff9L 9031
CLARIFIER 11
90.77
CHLORINE
394 m
SI ARTEIFR
93T
EFFL PIPE
29F6E390J7
CLARIFIER 12
78.00
SUPERNATANT TROUGH
TO PLANT UFT STATIONI�
SLOTTED PPE SKINNER
- 96.00
T.WAS. k SCUM
DISCHARGE It . 95.00
94T00
94.00
--
•y.W
94.D0
OPENING 11NER(�'
-
CL93.DOPENING
WEIR F V.
. 94.50
TPRE-MIK
\\\:,
THIC
KEYi KENERICKENER
PRE -MI)
GRAVITY THICKENER
AEROBIC
DIGFSTFR
=i
PRE -MIX
79.00
76.00
78.00
78.00
II
96.00
- 94.00
- 92.00
- 90.00
- 68.00
- 86.00
- 54.00
- 82.00
- 60m
75.00
HYDRAULIC PROFILE
96.00
TRUCK
LAADN6
SLUDGE
LOADING
STATION
.Oe
0077
CHI ORINF
WEIR GTE
e9.00
N6RMNLY OPEN)
93.00
91D0 9T77
WE- ELEV.
CHLORINE
CONTACT
BASINS
89.60
89.03
V-NOTCH
-sem
87.50
DECHI ORINATION
I BASIN I.
7
EFFLUENT
PUMP STATION
50
dj
MANHOI F #2
CASCADE
AEBATOR
LUMBER RIVER
gem
96.00
94.00
92.00
- 90.00
moo
- 66.00
- 64.00
- 52m
-130m
- 76m
- 76m
- 74.00
T5
s9
HYDRAULIC PROFILE
;o
o:
SEPT.2000
u... ecE
DEW
o.am BGL
AS NOTED
G-7
13

Attachment 6
Current NPDES Permit

Honorable Nedward Geddy, Mayor
Town of Fairmont
P.O. Box 248
Fairmont, North Carolina 28340
Michael F. Easley, Governor
State of North Carolina
William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek; P.E., Director
Division of Water Quality
June 23, 2004
Subject: NPDES Draft Permit
Permit No. NC0086550
Fairmont Regional WWTP
Robeson County
Dear Mayor Geddy:
Please find enclosed the DRAFT permit for the subject wastewater treatment plant for
your review and comment. Please provide any comments you have regarding the
draft permit to this office by July 30, 2004. At this time, the Division is also
publishing a notice in the newspapers of general circulation in Robeson County,
inviting public comment on the draft permit. Following the 30-day comment period,
we will review all pertinent comments received and take appropriate action on the
permit renewal.
The draft permit includes the following proposed changes to your existing permit:
• Ammonia Weekly average of 12.0 mg/1 - The Division has been adding weekly
average limits for ammonia to permits with monthly averages since December 2002
in order to conform to Federal NPDES regulations.
Quarterly monitoring for Mercury - The effluent samples collected for Mercury shall
be analyzed by a low level method (EPA Method 1631) beginning three months after
the permit effective date. Currently there are 11 commercial labs certified by the
state to perform Method 1631. Your facility has been added to the list of facilities
subject to Method 1631 because mercury bioaccumulation in fish tissue in the
Lumber River has resulted in fish advisories and impaired water designations, and
a Phase 2 Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) is currently in progress for the
Lumber and Waccamaw watersheds. These TMDLs, scheduled for completion in
Winter 2006, will utilize the low level effluent mercury data to determine current
mercury loadings to surface waters, as determine allowable mercury loadings.
Attached to this draft permit are copies of letters (dated 8/30/02 and 8/12/03)
which were sent to the initial 155 facilities subject to Method 1631. Although some
of the information has changed, the letters provide general background on the low
level method and clean sampling techniques, as well as follow-up contacts.
• Monitoring for Total Zinc and Total Copper - The results of the Effluent Pollutant
Scan show three detections of Total Zinc above the states' action level. Quarterly
monitoring will generate data on these parameters that will help the Division
determine if there is reasonable potential that the discharge will cause an
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer Visit us on the INTERNET @ www.enr.state.nc.us

Permit No. NC0086550
Fairmont Regional WWTP
Page 2
exceedance of water quality standards and criteria in the river. Although Copper
was detected below the action level concentration monitoring requirements were
included to collect data for reasonable potential evaluation. After twelve data points
are collected these data can be submitted to the Division with a request to reduce
or eliminate monitoring requirements if the data shows that there is no reasonable
potential to exceed water quality standards.
• Annual effluent pollutant scan of the effluent - The Division is implementing the
annual monitoring requirement for all POTW with effluent flows greater than 1.0
MGD or with a pretreatment program to comply with federal regulations for
municipal dischargers. The total set of samples collected during the permit cycle
must represent seasonal variations.
• Outfall location - The latitude and longitude were corrected to reflect the actual
location of the outfall.
If you have any questions concerning the draft permit or the other requirements for
your facility, please call me at [phone], extension 553.
Sincerely,
Teresa Rodriguez
NPDES Unit
Cc: NPDES Files
EPA Region 4
Aquatic Toxicology Unit
Fayetteville Regional Office
Bill Lester, P.E. - Hobbs, Upchurch & Associates
P.O. Box 1737
Southern Pines, North Carolina 28388

Permit No. NC0086550
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
PERMIT
TO DISCHARGE WASTEWATER UNDER THE
NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM
In compliance with the provisions of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1, other lawful
standards and regulations promulgated and adopted by the North Carolina Environmental
Management Commission, and the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, as amended, the
Town of Fairmont
is hereby authorized to discharge wastewater from a facility located at the
Fairmont Regional WWTP
S.R. 2312 near the Town of Boardman
Robeson County
to receiving waters designated as Lumber River in the Lumber River Basin in accordance with
effluent limitations, monitoring requirements, and other conditions set forth in Parts I, II, III and
IV hereof.
This permit shall become effective.
This permit and authorization to discharge shall expire at midnight on July 31, 2009.
Signed this day.
1)1..\1-.;.[
Alan W. Klimek, P.E., Director
Division of Water Quality
By Authority of the Environmental Management Commission
Page 1

Permit No. NC0086550
SUPPLEMENT TO PERMIT COVER SHEET
All previous NPDES Permits issued to this facility, whether for operation or discharge are hereby revoked As of
this permit issuance, any previously issued permit bearing this number is no longer effective. Therefore, the exclusive
authority to operate and discharge from this facility arises under the permit conditions, requirements, terms, and
provisions included herein.
Town of Fairmont
is hereby authorized to:
1. Continue to operate an existing 1.75 MGD wastewater treatment facility located on S.R.
2312, Robeson County, and consisting of:
• Mechanical Bar Screen
• Grit Removal
• Influent pump station
• Dual aeration basins
• Secondary and tertiary clarifiers
• Gravity thickener
• Aerobic digesters
• Chlorination
• Dechlorination
• Cascade aerator
2. Discharge from said treatment works, through outfall 001, into the Lumber River, a Class
C-Sw water in the Lumber River Basin, at the location specified on the attached map.
Page 2

. ---
•
. . ,
....• • ;....t. •
- - ft.'-'i..f'•:..;:-,;-i?P'•L-
• :s....N2,,,1"-,,..ti'.'
. • .. .
..v.
-',.
whitO, Oak
.
• Stuffnip , .
.,,,..
'' - ^:
,4..4. ...., 2.t.'':•*=-.. •. , .
, g .2'7....1,`, %,..1.1.1. :, .." : • .
, ,,i,,, • ''',,e;: -,,, :t '': •-,.
'''.--,:",•-.:,,,,.
‘:..i., -,.1.,74„iv.,.- • ' ,
" ' ' - •''. - • Cr
„,
'., •.--*** :• ;4., -: ,,, • '.:•,-..
:.- 4....-:-...!, .:. 7:';:r• -
.
i
-..,
•
1.-. i
, ,.. I' ''.
-
: () i ,.
-
1@:1
.
a
.11. de 7 .......
,..
..,,.:7,.
.-67E'.:,.„
'
ji",:',..''''.
'-714•4: :1",i.!",,
-,‘ ',':,:•:"'.7.•••,r...1
-.:_, . ,
t.'.-
4'.
..{
adi. 1
I
.9-
.144,-,,,
.••"
dt,' - af t, .7 -. :i. ,,,,...T.
-.F.:: 1, '•C::.*,.. ' •
f.--,w-s.--0.4,,,
....P.: l' .aita,'?.11d.,,, I ,i.'; -LI' ..,44
1•-•:-"''.-?.4.;..-IL 6.,•••••••-
•
. ..tr
- .4.-.......
• " Cilie,,,71'..','"'"
- 44..,4*,-._-,..--:,,,,I,.,..,,-„,„1...,--,,,„:„.
-,,...;,,,,„•.- --"7' ...• "," dia."-, ada '
.”, ',-- -4.;:.,-46,.; ll'y • -,0•,, •
• .... • .4... . , _-. . .. --,
....... ,:.... : :;_ :,6, • ;0:-. .,.•--,, L
' -'47,,,i'llii,-.'.16r-',-,..;,;‘,,,.:::',
...iii: ':i.',..'!..-4k."(..Ipt.-749.-;! ., ..
• - '‘• ''- • ' ' -r • ' •• .....'"^7
r.':,..r. --...1.6.. 46;', .7. ,,--'"': '-''' I
• 4L., ,
a.P..' • ' ' ... 2., .
0. -'''...,o -• .4y,-,
1 , . , ' ,... ...:
.4.- ,..
/1 • ...: .;--_,w • '
/ • ,..,..4.,-- 1 •
4.- •I••
, 7 4.-: • '4,41i
.4..,' ..,:P, 1:
-.
P,
,t,•,4-ile......:446,,,,.,
' .. . 4 7,..(:. " ....''''.
••••;,,.... '1'.7...4' 4:•#,:4•4s. •Itt'•4•=: vs-
•••-,••r:,." •,-17,4`.. '.•7.:41;”.; : , . . '
, ; -,, ;,•'.007,.:11.• • • --..• .0,,, • ...i.:.-, ' ••ti-
., •.,. ' -i. - ' - .-.', - -,.:.-gir .-4.. .. ,.. .
,.•...•.;r_.•
.
',:•i• ,1"-:-..1•,•7••,-,
.:
'..'0.'--:.",, -4......:-.
'..,...^a.:i,-..
.
, ...-i
.,17,••;.:,,
! 4'1111W
••- 0
,-.6..-
.
44?"
.,-..."
1
..-.
..
,• 1•-••'
?:•4•. :--4,.1'
7 ",;a ,-!•., •
F .,
I 4,2
. ..i . ,. r/,y.!
i,'...,.-,....,:
:
-'4a,''-l'i6',t.,.-
7
• ,,..-,, •' .
•4,_
....
,;'.4....,.. _
,.....7:::,.....,'..:44- .-1:-
....: .„,.......:-...:
,.. ,-,..„•.,_,....-,,..„,
....-• ..,.....,...-:-,,,-,..,-
....,..,--....,..,:.:....:-...,,,,,,,
,..'-' 4,7:17,.t'..C.74,1,•k :.!!".•
.....-
•,...„-,...
,-
••,.
. .
,,-.
dr —-
A;
.
•
, . -..ir----,-p!• ,., -4;:.:!,,.:-..!F!.. -•••••
•:••••,..4.., - .:-..-,,, • :.„.,:-.; _ ...,4
.._443tit?._...4-•:-.-!;_ ::...
f 41r., g-c: '4.. : ...-:7---_:.,,r; ..b. 4b.:
_ .
,..,,,,.....,-........-4.-,,,....,
„..,.....„,...-..„.....,,,,,,,ii,.,...,_. ,.,
••,-,......,..,,..,,...,,,-: „,,,„,...,...,,,,-
...,-,......„.... :..,........,,.. :
--.
b.. 41.N • ,'
;• '
1
,.
;,..,
... r_,.••••,
•
4)
,, -,-,•:.',:!;:,..
__.„.„.„,
, ..
._ . C.)
,..
ti
'., ''. - s
,,,,
.
......„..:.,,,,
Outfall 001
Al "
1P4' -' .-i'''
.
:,. ....,.,„::.:....,
.
."
jr.,.,:,,,.• ivi.
._,„.,.......' ...., ,
..,..&-.-1.4vg..
pri -. -:,.,..-_::7._11-,,--,...,„_„--___3,.,.„.-:*_..„..,.......-4_,,,,„.4
,... 4-,.,.....„.-16.:.:_.4......::,..„-...„.::t„,.....;-„.
- - ,
4.,N.
•• .
,_
4.
•-•--7.-7.,
.
...:.:‘,,,
'
4.b.-_ •
'
17,,?i I.;
• 4
'
'Yr,' • -. ..,,-A.'..r
•• -.•,.' ,--s • -
..„5-..., ,......„
"air A
. '. 1-
, .,,,:•,, ,_,,
\
• '
s.........
'' ' • ''
•
•
- .
I
• 'P'.1..,70" . ''...lia•-;,..,“.r. - ,
' • At!';'..,, '. „'•.4...... '''. ,•'...:::.;7.13 , ' .
,.. ,,4_41..r"' • ',,•!,i.,,•;?i"'1:::::-••
• -
' .
, ,•
%
11,
- -4,-,1•7' '..,.,11,'".,',.
'' '4,-;.-`4 . \
- ., ,..,,,
;.-.7 ..........,•,,,-,t7.
%;:•,..,.. .,41,
-i,:•.: 4.,..-,....
,;....4:,:--,..:
. ..0.._,°!?: '•
...
ci;m- • -
t . ... ,•'‘:,
'
0.
-
-;:.: '... •:: .
.,..
!.; - i
••••2•1",;", ' / r'•- -
,.• ,,,,, -1,, ,, .
••••••t....:, •;:s -21"1:4', *,.- --
• •
?.! • •
— ._ ,.
.,..
. • : -.
; ' '
•P,
.1-!';', - -
-
.. - •
--.., , . • ;:f
•••4!",` ' -.41- _ • •••,.."'•••.".:••••••• ...--.•i - .
,-,c••,:•-•.< . .•
.•••••:•_•-...•,;-,.......:4,.\
'.;e r ,:."-';• 1.7... .1',,,. S:, ,.• • - .,
'..'
•-;
.;--.•,:
; •
. ;,.. - • , •„•-,.
''.. '. i: ;'',.,,
t :
• '`.4:::-,1"..7,.-:,' i
..•:%, t.-•••"?.• ,!' -,4%.,
:....
, .•,`-'
.3,, •
0,.. •••
... ' ,•1:
I
.: .
..--T: .'
r.i.Lii
„.,,,,,.,,,::..:7„,,,,:.
' 7-.,...1 ;••*,', '' • ...•:::',,.-:••• i•i,..-.,:i;';;' - ..
,t,,iii":,,?I';....r,,:i4...4,4i,,,,i,..•,,.,•" • 1. y„ .,
,,, , ',74,.;',';'•?7,--•,..:4_,.,,•,,,
- . ',O.,. -,;,••,4, -.4.,• :, if •••
•
,
••.
•`,.-... :: ::.•-q-
I 4., ,,,.•
',,.'.2., ',.,-
.
•
.
f
\.•• \ 1
s.
..•.,..,
:. , . /....., i'.• ,
— --- :' ,
,-:,.• ' '- ,.;:',..:-..47?'.7'4,..
.. - • ' ult
,1,,:,:.
•''''''"'
'''
1/4. '..1,
-
•••••
• '''''' ;:"....-
4, „ ..-
' •ick:,.,----•' ;.'r4.,•,,- ' ., 1,....H••.. •
_, , . -,,,••. r•gt,, .. , . - • ..7,.."....,,-.
:,,,.. , ::,,,,.. ,-,
•:,, • '; .,....,1.7:+;,;.+
...i:
'6`..'..
,
,
,,--
0....,.• ..p..- ••....
••••••-,' -
.ev- ,,, , .,•,. • ..,-•i...' ::.'-'
:.•
,c
..
„,- :•.' 7' -1,•-• ., • :- •.:.. ,,• ,,,,,
- -
-0.- rr- e.,..,:,:' fl
1
-:l',
•
.
- --; '
• ' ''''t -.4" ‘-- . - • '--- :,
-- 'eta.,"
4- '
' • •
::...-
-. -:- .-. .•••2'-'
,,:„...,
. i",-. 4-,. 4,..,...;ZE ......,.-- . ,,,z.....
Del- • ,
0-1 J .01.-1.,_ 7.-... '.:. ' .•
..-
. '
' `,."
: .
•
..„ . .
.
..
.. .
'
.. - '
"
-".• .. .
• .
. .
. .._.
. aZ........,
, .. • -....:,, :ad.:" • • , ''','''. • • ..". - . L.'', ''..... -.-.'
-a,' .„,,.7 , ' ...a., 7. .
.....
. „,,
. \ _:•__
.
tr• :.7,..: ‘: 1-------'-'-\___
•
—
f_
• "''' •
__ !..- - t- i -, ,..,--“,1-,••
-7•••
Liirei •'' ' it
..,
1
' • . V3
r—
f
l''..
_
. . .
...... ,_,) ,
• •••, •
:, , .„,t, ,...• .., •-•• , 1- ••• • -•••
_
- -, *..- . • • . - ‘•
.
.,,,,- - —. _- --..... 1: ' \
4. .......`` -
• \ • -\
1 1 r
- (
... 1
• .
•.
•
' • _:" I.:V.'''.
r• • ‘,....
,•
• - ' ' ' '
I ( • '
• . ..
. ___./
r -----1 '
.......
......., ..-
...
•1
1
f",- I •
1 1, : . ' ,
: ---, .,.. '.. •
7.•• --- .-.t • A .,--*-* :"7:7-", '.-, .:'.--..,..•
.....: • ....L.. L _ 0-
" 4-- -6-. '
, ,--r -----i,•-••••••• - ''': • .•-•
. -
C\
0 -
......—,-----.•.,-.- ,
i ., i
''' 1;' • ', "
s• k ,
. \
..,:.:.
,4-,
.-.1.4:. , .7. r .
... • ..
,
...- . .....
,•... - '-':-...-
. ..- -
• \
\•,,., ,,
r
- . .
.....
; - . ,,,,..; •
- t•
1 C"
-- .-:- -
_. _
-, •
•••••," •-•
'''''
•%, \ ''' "-
.. no \ .
.1 \
11 ... ...
•-„,
i ; "t...
// O. '
....- -,• ' • • ..:
,/ ' s
I --
-- f.•, •°' .
.,.. ..
',.. \ ,
1 :
1./ , --.. -
-- -
---- -
;:. 4.• -4.. a
',at. . ... : - ' ''''.•
‘..
•••• --, • . ..!. ' . ' '
- ,
; : , -7-ada, '''‘ ' V- ''' '''' , " 1.
. S.,.........,
..
C.
.........---
4/
,..."•
-`4"::...... : . ..0 :
„ \p
Nas '
....
ed.
ad. ' ' '...., . ;
..-
.
-4
.
.;\ \1/4. s•
/
,;\`--.
7.,.. .../._.
. • O.
•
t' --.‘
,—
"
0
-.g
- '..
*"
•
") '‘. c1
_
- :'"'....-I.
1
7---
't
1
c-
6,1,
\ \
-'"-- --,:‘
Town of Fairmont
State Grid/Quad: J23NW Evergreen Latitude: 34° 26' 33" N
Lonietude: 78° 57' 37" W
Receiving Strewn: Lumber River Drainage Basin: Lumber River Basin
i Stream Class: C-Sw Sub -Basin: 03-07-51
not to scale
NPDES Permit No. NC0086550

Permit No. NC0086550
A. (1.) EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS AND MONITORING REQUIREMENTS
Beginning on the effective date of this permit and lasting until permit expiration, the Permittee is
authorized to discharge treated wastewater from Outfall 001. Such discharges shall be limited and
monitored by the Permittee as specified below:
PARAMETER
EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS
MONITORING REQUIREMENTS
Monthly
Average
Weekly.
Average
Daily
Maximum
Measurement
Frequency
Sample Type
Sample
Location 1
Flow (MGD)
1.75
Continuous
Recording
I or E
BOD5 2
15.0 mg/L
22.5 mg/L
3/Week
Composite
I, E
Total Suspended Solids2
30.0 mg/L
45.0 mg/L
3/Week
Composite
I, E
NH3 as N
4.0 mg/L
12.0 mg/L
3/Week
Composite
E
Dissolved Oxygen
Daily average not less than 5.0 mg/L
3/Week
Grab
E
Fecal Coliform (geometric
mean)
200/100 ml
400/100 ml
3/Week
Grab
E
Total Residual Chlorin&
28 µg/L
3/Week
Grab
E
Temperature °C
Daily
Grab
E
Total Nitrogen
•
Monthly
Composite
E
Total Phosphorus
Monthly
Composite
E
pH
Between 6.0 and 9.0 Standard Units
3/Week
Grab
E
Total Mercurys
Quarterly
Grab
E
Total Zinc
Quarterly
Composite
E
Total Copper
Quarterly
Composite
E
Chronic Toxicity6
Quarterly
Composite
E
Footnotes:
1. I: Influent. E: Effluent. See condition A. (2) of this permit for instream monitoring requirements.
2. The monthly average BOD5 and Total Suspended Solids concentrations shall not exceed 15% of the
respective influent value (85% removal).
3. Effluent monitoring and limitation only apply if chlorine or a chlorine derivative is added to the waste
stream during treatment.
4. For a given wastewater sample, TN = TKN + NO3-N + NO2-N, where TN is total nitrogen, TKN is
Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen, and NO3-N and NO2-N are nitrate and nitrite nitrogen, respectively.
5. Effluent samples collected for mercury must be analyzed by EPA Method 1631, beginning three
months after the permit effective date. The quantitation limit for Mercury shall be 0.0005 µg/L (0.5
ng/1). Levels reported less than 0.0005 µg/L will be considered zero for compliance purposes.
6. Chronic Toxicity (Ceriodaphnia) @ 2.2 %, February; May, August and November, see special
condition A. (3.) of this permit.
THERE SHALL BE NO DISCHARGE OF FLOATING SOLIDS OR VISIBLE FOAM IN OTHER THAN TRACE
AMOUNTS.
Page 4

Permit No. NC0086550
A. (2.) INSTREAM MONITORING REQUIREMENTS
Instream monitoring is required for the following parameters at the locations specified:
EFFLUENT
CHARACTERISTICS
Measurement Frequency '
Sample Type
Sample;
Lbcation1
Fecal Coliform
June -Sept
3/week
Grab
U, D
October -May
1/week
Dissolved Oxygen
June -Sept
3/week
Grab
U, D
October -May
1/week
Temperature
June -Sept
3/week
Grab
U, D
October -May
1/week
Footnotes:
1. U - Upstream at US Highway 74 Bridge, D- Downstream approximately 1,000 yards below Outfall 001.
A. (3.) CHRONIC TOXICITY PERMIT LIMIT (QRTRLY)
The effluent discharge shall at no time exhibit observable inhibition of reproduction or significant
mortality to Ceriodaphnia dubia at an effluent concentration of 2.2 %.
The permit holder shall perform at a minimum, quarterly monitoring using test procedures outlined
in the "North Carolina Ceriodaphnia Chronic Effluent Bioassay Procedure," Revised February
1998, or subsequent versions or "North Carolina Phase II Chronic Whole Effluent Toxicity Test
Procedure" (Revised -February 1998) or subsequent versions. The tests will be performed during the
months of February, May, August and November. Effluent sampling for this testing shall be
performed at the NPDES permitted final effluent discharge below all treatment processes.
If the test procedure performed as the first test of any single quarter results in.a failure or ChV
below the permit limit, then multiple -concentration testing shall be performed at a minimum, in
each of the two following months as described in "North Carolina Phase II Chronic Whole
Effluent Toxicity Test Procedure" (Revised -February 1998) or subsequent versions.
The chronic value for multiple concentration tests will be determined using the geometric mean of
the highest concentration having no detectable impairment of reproduction or survival and the
lowest concentration that does have a detectable impairment of reproduction or survival. The
definition of "detectable impairment," collection methods, exposure regimes, and further
statistical methods are specified in the "North Carolina Phase II Chronic Whole Effluent Toxicity
Test Procedure" (Revised -February 1998) or subsequent versions.
All toxicity testing results required as part of this permit condition will be entered on the Effluent
Discharge Monitoring Form (MR-1) for the months in which tests were performed, using the
parameter code TGP3B for the pass/fail results and THP3B for the Chronic Value. Additionally,
DWQ Form AT-3 (original) is to be sent to the following address:
Page 5

Attention:
Permit No. NC0086550
NC DENR / DWQ / Environmental Sciences Branch
1621 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1621
Completed Aquatic Toxicity Test Forms shall be filed with the Environmental Sciences Branch no
later than 30 days after the end of the reporting period for which the report is made.
Test data shall be complete, accurate, include all supporting chemical/physical measurements and
all concentration/response data, and be certified by laboratory supervisor and ORC or approved
designate signature. Total residual chlorine of the effluent toxicity sample must be measured and
reported if chlorine is employed for disinfection of the waste stream.
Should there be no discharge of flow from the facility during a month in which toxicity
monitoring is required, the permittee will complete the information located at the top of the
aquatic toxicity (AT) test form indicating the facility name, permit number, pipe number, county,
and the month/year of the report with the notation of "No Flow" in the comment area of the
form. The report shall be submitted to the Environmental Sciences Branch at the address cited
above.
Should the permittee fail to monitor during a month in which toxicity monitoring is required,
monitoring will be required during the following month.
Should any test data from this monitoring requirement or tests performed by the North Carolina
Division of Water Quality indicate potential impacts to the receiving stream, this permit may be
re -opened and modified to include alternate monitoring requirements or limits.
NOTE: Failure to achieve test conditions as specified in the cited document, such as minimum
control organism survival, minimum control organism reproduction, and appropriate
environmental controls, shall constitute an invalid test and will require immediate follow-up
testing to be completed no later than the last day of the month following the month of the initial
monitoring.
A. (4.) MERCURY REOPENER
The Division may reopen this permit to require mercury load limitations, mercury minimization
plans, and/or source water characterization following completion of the Phase 2 Mercury TMDL
for the Lumber and Waccamaw River watersheds.
Page 6

Permit No. NC0086550
A. (5.) EFFLUENT POLLUTANT SCAN
The pemlittee shall perform an annual Effluent Pollutant Scan for all parameters listed in the table below (in
accordance with 40 CFR Part 136). The annual effluent pollutant scan samples shall represent seasonal (summer,
winter, fall, spring) variations over the 5-year permit cycle. Unless otherwise indicated, metals shall be analyzed as
"total recoverable." Additionally, the method detection level and the minimum level shall be the most sensitive as
provided by the appropriate analytical procedure.
Ammonia (as N) Trans-1,2-dichloroethylene Bis (2-chloroethyl) ether
Chlorine (total residual, TRC) 1,1-dichloroethylene Bis (2-chloroisopropyl) ether
Dissolved oxygen 1,2-dichloropropane Bis (2-ethylhexyl) phthalate
Nitrate/Nitrite 1,3-dichloropropylene 4-bromophenyl phenyl ether
Total Kjeldahl nitrogen Ethylbenzene Butyl benzyl phthalate
Oil and grease Methyl bromide 2-chloronaphthalene
Total Phosphorus Methyl chloride 4-chlorophenyl phenyl ether
Total dissolved solids Methylene chloride Chrysene
Hardness 1,1,2,2-tetrachloroethane Di-n-butyl phthalate
Antimony Tetrachloroethylene Di-n-octyl phthalate
Arsenic Toluene Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
Beryllium 1,1,1-trichloroethane 1,2-dichlorobenzene
Cadmium 1,1,2-tchloroethane 1,3-dichlorobenzene
Chromium Trichloroethylene 1,4-dichlorobenzene
Copper Vinyl chloride 3,3-dichlorobenzidine
Lead Acid -extractable compounds Diethyl phthalate
Mercury P-chloro-m-cresol Dimethyl phthalate
Nickel 2-chlorophenol 2,4-dinitrotoluene
Selenium 2,4-dichlorophenol 2,6-dinitrotoluene
Silver 2,4-dimethylphenol I ,2-diphenylhydrazine
Thallium 4,6-dinitro-o-cresol Fluoranthene
Zinc 2,4-dinitrophenol Fluorene
Cyanide 2-nitrophenol Hexachlorobenzene
Total phenolic compounds 4-nitrophenol Hexachlorobutadiene
Volatile organic compounds: Pentachlorophenol Hexachlorocyclo-pentadiene
Acrolein Phenol Hexachloroethane
Acrylonitrile 2,4,6-trichlorophenol Indeno( 1,2,3-cd)pyrene
Benzene Base -neutral compounds' lsophorone
Bromoform Acenaphthene Naphthalene
Carbon tetrachloride Acenaphthylene Nitrobenzene
Chlorobenzene Anthracene N-nitrosodi-n-propylamine
Chlorodibromomethane Benzidine N-nitrosodimethylamine
Chloroethane Benzo(a)anthracene N-ni trosodiphenylamine
2-chloroethyl vinyl ether Benzo(a)pyrene Phenanthrene
Chloroform 3,4 benzolluoranthene Pyrene
Dichlorobromomethane Benzo(ghi)perylene 1,2,4-trichlorobenzenc
1,1-dichloroethane Benzo(k)fluoranthene
1 ,2-dichloroethane Bis (2-chloroethoxy) methane
Test results shall be reported to the Division in DWQ Form- DNIR-PPA1 or in a form approved by the Director,
within 90 days of sampling. A copy of the report shall be submitted to Central Files to the following address:
Division of Water Quality, Water Quality Section, 1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617.
Page 7

DENR/DWQ
FACT SHEET FOR NPDES PERMIT DEVELOPMENT
NPDES No. NC0086550
Facility Information
Applicant/Facility Name:
Town of Fairmont / Fairmont Regional WWTP
Applicant Address:
P.O. Box 248, Fairmont, NC 28340
Facility Address:
S. R. 2312 near Town of Boardman
Permitted Flow (MGD):
1.75
Type of Waste:
100 % Domestic
Facility Classification:
III
Permit Status:
Renewal
County:
Robeson
Miscellaneous
Receiving Stream:
Lumber River
Regional Office:
FRO
StreamClassification:
C-Sw
State Grid / USGS Quad:
J23NW / Evergreen_
Teresa Rodriguez
303(d) Listed?
TIVIDL?
Yes
Yes
Permit Writer:
Basin/Subbasin:
03-07-51
Date:
6/16/04
Drainage Area (mi):
.. :..._ ..
1228
.k ���.}��tt T Krg 1
t1. r w *AI?. H'
- ,,. t s �
k . i .5�e_...6.1•:v. :•4„ .:Rigs tt i ',
,
Lat. 34° 26' 33" N Long. 78° 57' 37" W
Summer 7Q10 (cfs)
122
Winter 7Q10 (cfs):
250
30Q2 (cfs)
304
Average Flow (cfs):
1300
IWC (%):
2.2
Summary: The Town of Fairmont submitted a permit application on January 30, 2004. This is a recently
built facility that started service in 2002. The facility has a capacity of 1.75 MGD and consists of a
mechanical bar screen, grit chamber, influent pump station, dual aeration basins, secondary and tertiary
clarifiers, gravity thickener, aerobic digesters, chlorination, dechlorination and cascade aerator. They
received sanitary wastewater from Orrum Middle School and have plans to tie in several schools and smaller
municipalities in the area.
Pre -Treatment: The Town does not have a pretreatment program. Before any industrial flow is accepted the
Town shall developed and implement a pretreatment program.
Receiving Stream: The Lumber River is listed as impaired for mercury. A Phase I TMDL was approved by
EPA in October 2001. NPDES facilities will collect mercury data to assist in the Phase II mercury TMDL
development. The Lumber River is classified as excellent for benthic microinvertebrates upstream of the
discharge. The River will be monitored for mercury fish tissue concentrations as part of the Phase I TMDL.
DIM Review: The facility commenced the discharge in June 2002. Data was reviewed for the period of June
2002 to April 2004. Average flow was 0.501 MGD, BOD averaged 3 mg/1 and TSS averaged 4.5 mg/1. The
facility has met all effluent limitations thus far.
Effluent Toxicity: The permit requires quarterly Chronic Toxicity Testing (Ceriodaphnia) at an effluent
concentration of 2.2 %. They have passed all the toxicity tests since June 2002.
Fact Sheet
NPDES NC0086550

Priority Pollutant Scan: Results of three PPAs were submitted with the application for renewal. The tests
were conducted on three consecutive days in January 2004. The following parameters were detected: Total
Phenolics (20.76 41), Chloroform (8.07 µg/1), Copper (5 µg/1), and Cyanide (7 µg/1). The Division has
established an acceptable detection level for cyanide of 10 µg/1, samples with detections below 10 µg/1 are
considered as < 1014/1. Zinc was detected above the action level standard of 50 µg/1 (145 µg/1, 137 µg/1 &
155 µg/1). Copper was detected just below the action level standard of 7 141. Monitoring for Total Zinc and
Total Copper will be included in the permit.
SUMMARY OF PROPOSED CHANGES
Permit Condition
Proposed Changes
Comments
Ammonia
Weekly Average limit of
12 mg/1
40 CFR 122 Federal requirements and Division
Policy require weekly limits for ammonia.
Mercury
Quarterly monitoring
Mercury Permitting Strategy for the Lumber River
Basin.
Zinc
Quarterly monitoring
Zinc was detected in the PPA in amounts greater
than the action level standard.
Copper
Quarterly monitoring
Monitoring is included to collect data to evaluate
reasonable potential.
Conductivity
Eliminate effluent and
instream monitoring
Facilities discharging only domestic wastewater do
not need to monitor for conductivity.
Effluent Pollutant
Analysis
Yearly testing
This condition is been added to all municipal
facilities above 1 MGD to collect data necessary
for permit renewal.
Outfall location
Corrected latitude and
longitude
Latitude and longitude were changed to reflect the
actual location of the discharge.
PROPOSED SCHEDULE FOR PERMIT ISSUANCE
Draft Permit to Public Notice:
Permit Scheduled to Issue:
June 23, 2004
August 16, 2004
Fact Sheet
NPDES NC0086550

NPDES DIVISION CONTACT
If you have questions regarding any of the above information or on the attached permit, please contact Teresa
Rodriguez at (919) 7333-5083 ext. 553.
NAME: j'G� i DATE: 6/ 5hy
REGIONAL OFFICE COMMENTS
NAME: DATE:
SUPERVISOR: DATE:
Fact Sheet
NPf1FR NrnnsM 1

Part E
Toxicity Test Data

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
Town of Fairmont WWTP, NC0086550
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Renewal
RIVER BASIN:
Lumber
SUPPLEMENTAL APPLICATION INFORMATION
PART E. TOXICITY TESTING DATA
POTWs meeting one or more of the following criteria must provide the results of whole effluent toxicity tests for acute or chronic toxicity for each of the
facility's discharge points: 1) POTWs with a design flow rate greater than or equal to 1.0 mgd; 2) POTWs with a pretreatment program (or those that are
required to have one under 40 CFR Part 403); or 3) POTWs required by the permitting authority to submit data for these parameters.
• At a minimum, these results must include quarterly testing for a 12-month period within the past 1 year using multiple species (minimum of two
species), or the results from four tests performed at least annually in the four and one-half years prior to the application, provided the results
show no appreciable toxicity, and testing for acute and/or chronic toxicity, depending on the range of receiving water dilution. Do not include
information on combined sewer overflows in this section. All information reported must be based on data collected through analysis conducted
using 40 CFR Part 136 methods. In addition, this data must comply with QA/QC requirements of 40 CFR Part 136 and other appropriate QA/QC
requirements for standard methods for analytes not addressed by 40 CFR Part 136.
• In addition, submit the results of any other whole effluent toxicity tests from the past four and one-half years. If a whole effluent toxicity test
conducted during the past four and one-half years revealed toxicity, provide any information on the cause of the toxicity or any results of a
toxicity reduction evaluation, if one was conducted.
• If you have already submitted any of the information requested in Part E, you need not submit it again. Rather, provide the information
requested in question E.4 for previously submitted information. If EPA methods were not used, report the reasons for using alternate methods.
If test summaries are available that contain all of the information requested below, they may be submitted in place of Part E.
If no biomonitoring data is required, do not complete Part E. Refer to the Application Overview for directions on which other sections of the form to
complete.
E.1. Required Tests.
Indicate the number of whole effluent
® chronic 0 acute
E.2. Individual Test Data. Complete the
column per test (where each species
toxicity tests conducted in the past four and one-half years.
following chart for each whole effluent toxicity test conducted in the last four and one-half years. Allow one
constitutes a test). Copy this page
Test number: See Attached
if
more than three tests are being reported.
Test number: See Attached
Test number: See Attached
a. Test information.
Test Species & test method number
Age at initiation of test
Outfall number
Dates sample collected
Date test started
Duration
b. Give toxicity test methods followed.
Manual title
Edition number and year of publication
•
Page number(s)
c. Give the sample collection method(s) used. For multiple grab samples, indicate the number of grab samples used.
24-Hour composite
Grab
d. Indicate where the sample was taken in relation to disinfection. (Check all that apply for each. -
Before disinfection
After disinfection
After dechlorination
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22.
Page 15 of 22

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
Town of Fairmont WWTP, NC0086550
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Renewal
RIVER BASIN:
Lumber
Test number: Test number: Test number:
e. Describe the point in the treatment process at which the sample was collected.
Sample was collected:
f. For each test, include whether the test was intended to assess chronic toxicity, acute toxicity, or both
Chronic toxicity
Acute toxicity
g. Provide the type of test performed.
Static
Static -renewal
Flow -through
h. Source of dilution water. If laboratory water, specify type; if receiving water, specify source.
Laboratory water
Receiving water
i. Type of dilution water. If salt water, specify "natural" or type of artificial sea salts or brine used.
Fresh water
Salt water
j. Give the percentage effluent used for all concentrations in the test series.
k. Parameters measured during he test. (State whether parameter meets test method specifications)
pH
Salinity
Temperature
Ammonia
Dissolved oxygen
I. Test Results.
Acute:
Percent survival in 100%
effluent
o/a
%
LCso
95% C.I.
%
%
Control percent survival
%
%
%
Other (describe)
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22.
Page 16 of 22

i I
--a
FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
Town of Fairmont WWTP, NC0086550
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Renewal
RIVER BASIN:
Lumber
Chronic:
NOEC
0/0
ID25
%
Control percent survival
Other (describe)
m. Quality Control/Quality Assurance.
Is reference toxicant data available?
Was reference toxicant test within
acceptable bounds?
What date was reference toxicant test
run (MM/DD/YYYY)?
Other (describe)
E.3. Toxicity Reduction Evaluation. Is the treatment works involved in a Toxicity Reduction Evaluation?
❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, describe:
E.4. Summary of Submitted Biomonitoring Test Information. If you have submitted biomonitoring test information, or information regarding the
cause of toxicity, within the past four and one-half years, provide the dates the information was submitted to the permitting authority and a summary
of the results.
Date submitted: / / (MM/DD/YYYY)
Summary of results: (see instructions)
END OF PART E.
REFER TO THE APPLICATION OVERVIEW (PAGE 1) TO DETERMINE WHICH OTHER PARTS
OF FORM 2A YOU MUST COMPLETE.
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22. Page 17 of 22

Part C
Certification

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
Town of Fairmont WWTP, NC0086550
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Renewal
RIVER BASIN:
Lumber
BASIC APPLICATION?INFORMATIOI
PART C. CERTIFICATION
All applicants must complete the Certification Section. Refer to instructions to determine who is an officer for the purposes of this
certification. All applicants must complete all applicable sections of Form 2A, as explained in the Application Overview. Indicate below which
parts of Form 2A you have completed and are submitting. By signing this certification statement, applicants confirm that they have reviewed
Form 2A and have completed all sections that apply to the facility for which this application is submitted.
Indicate which parts of Form 2A you have completed and are submitting:
El Basic Application Information packet Supplemental Application Information packet:
® Part D (Expanded Effluent Testing Data)
El Part E (Toxicity Testing: Biomonitoring Data)
❑ Part F (Industrial User Discharges and RCRA/CERCLA Wastes)
❑ Part G (Combined Sewer Systems)
ALL APPLICANTS MUST COMPLETE THE, FOLLOWING CERTIFICATION.
I certify under penalty of law that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance with a system
designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or persons who
manage the system or those persons directly responsible for gathering the information, the information is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true,
accurate, and complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false info m t oc , eJins�tai ,so it : fine .Ad,icap ' ment
for knowing violations.
Name and official title
Signature
Blake Proctor, Town Manager
(
4. tl J 1 ! v---�
Telephone number [phone]
Date signed
F E B - 2 2009
DENR - WATER QUALITY
Upon request of the permitting authority, you must submit any other information necessary to assure wastewater treatment practices at the treatment
works or identify appropriate permitting requirements.
POINT SOURCE BRANCH
SEND COMPLETED FORMS TO:
NCDENR/ DWQ
Attn: NPDES Unit
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22. Page 9 of 22

Attachment 6
Current NPDES Permit

Honorable Nedward Geddy, Mayor
Town of Fairmont
P.O. Box 248
Fairmont, North Carolina 28340
Michael F. Easley, Governor
State of North Carolina
William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E., Director
Division of Water Quality
June 23, 2004
Subject: NPDES Draft Permit
Permit No. NC0086550
Fairmont Regional WWTP
Robeson County
Dear Mayor Geddy:
Please find enclosed the DRAFT permit for the subject wastewater treatment plant for
your review and comment. Please provide any comments you have regarding the
draft permit to this office by July 30, 2004. At this time, the Division is also
publishing a notice in the newspapers of general circulation in Robeson County,
inviting public comment on the draft permit. Following the 30-day comment period,
we will review all pertinent comments received and take appropriate action on the
permit renewal.
The draft permit includes the following proposed changes to your existing permit:
• Ammonia Weekly average of 12.0 mg/1 - The Division has been adding weekly
average limits for ammonia to permits with monthly averages since December 2002
in order to conform to Federal NPDES regulations.
• Quarterly monitoring for Mercury - The effluent samples collected for Mercury shall
be analyzed by a low level method (EPA Method 1631) beginning three months after
the permit effective date. Currently there are 11 commercial labs certified by the
state to perform Method 1631. Your facility has been added to the list of facilities
subject to Method 1631 because mercury bioaccumulation in fish tissue in the
Lumber River has resulted in fish advisories and impaired water designations, and
a Phase 2 Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) is currently in progress for the
Lumber and Waccamaw watersheds. These TMDLs, scheduled for completion in
Winter 2006, will utilize the low level effluent mercury data to determine current
mercury loadings to surface waters, as determine allowable mercury loadings.
Attached to this draft permit are copies of letters (dated 8/30/02 and 8/12/03)
which were sent to the initial 155 facilities subject to Method 1631. Although some
of the information has changed, the letters provide general background on the low
level method and clean sampling techniques, as well as follow-up contacts.
• Monitoring for Total Zinc and Total Copper - The results of the Effluent Pollutant
Scan show three detections of Total Zinc above the states' action level. Quarterly
monitoring will generate data on these parameters that will help the Division
determine if there is reasonable potential that the discharge will cause an
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer Visit us on the INTERNET @ www.enr.state.nc.us

Permit No. NC0086550
Fairmont Regional WWTP
Page 2
exceedance of water quality standards and criteria in the river. Although Copper
was detected below the action level concentration monitoring requirements were
included to collect data for reasonable potential evaluation. After twelve data points
are collected these data can be submitted to the Division with a request to reduce
or eliminate monitoring requirements if the data shows that there is no reasonable
potential to exceed water quality standards.
• Annual effluent pollutant scan of the effluent - The Division is implementing the
annual monitoring requirement for all POTW with effluent flows greater than 1.0
MGD or with a pretreatment program to comply with federal regulations for
municipal dischargers. The total set of samples collected during the permit cycle
must represent seasonal variations.
• Outfall location - The latitude and longitude were corrected to reflect the actual
location of the outfall.
If you have any questions concerning the draft permit or the other requirements for
your facility, please call me at [phone], extension 553.
Sincerely,
Teresa Rodriguez
NPDES Unit
Cc: NPDES Files
EPA Region 4
Aquatic Toxicology Unit
Fayetteville Regional Office
Bill Lester, P.E. - Hobbs, Upchurch & Associates
P.O. Box 1737
Southern Pines, North Carolina 28388

Permit No. NC0086550
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
PERMIT
TO DISCHARGE WASTEWATER UNDER THE
NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM
In compliance with the provisions of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1, other lawful
standards and regulations promulgated and adopted by the North Carolina Environmental
Management Commission, and the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, as amended, the
Town of Fairmont
is hereby authorized to discharge wastewater from a facility located at the
Fairmont Regional WWTP
S.R. 2312 near the Town of Boardman
Robeson County
to receiving waters designated as Lumber River in the Lumber River Basin in accordance with
effluent limitations, monitoring requirements, and other conditions set forth in Parts I, II, III and
IV hereof.
This permit shall become effective.
This permit and authorization to discharge shall expire at midnight on July 31, 2009.
Signed this day.
Alan W. Klimek, P.E., Director
Division of Water Quality
By Authority of the Environmental Management Commission
Page 1

Permit No. NC0086550
SUPPLEMENT TO PERMIT COVER SHEET
All previous NPDES Permits issued to this facility, whether for operation or discharge are hereby revoked As of
this permit issuance, any previously issued permit bearing this number is no longer effective. Therefore, the exclusive
authority to operate and discharge from this facility arises under the permit conditions, requirements, terms, and
provisions included herein.
Town of Fairmont
is hereby authorized to:
1. Continue to operate an existing 1.75 MGD wastewater treatment facility located on S.R.
2312, Robeson County, and consisting of:
• Mechanical Bar Screen
• Grit Removal
• Influent pump station
• Dual aeration basins
• Secondary and tertiary clarifiers
• Gravity thickener
• Aerobic digesters
• Chlorination
• Dechlorination
• Cascade aerator
2. Discharge from said treatment works, through outfall 001, into the Lumber River, a Class
C-Sw water in the Lumber River Basin, at the location specified on the attached map.
-
Page 2

.• . J.F. "i ,
"_�
.. '�
- ~' "' 1
-
117hite Oak
•.ir ..
-�' •iL .:w , r
L
Y' ~ M• _ Y fi� M.'.
.y :!
am
` -
�
,\+
V' �'?
1130
.11 _. •i r •-.
Y•
.\.-
_�.� -)i
! �^
PIP.
\ 1. �. .w
.:--,:',. _ ...•__ :Y. 5`•.�
.. .`�•
{
l 'q' w•. ++ .it r► .Ir•
c -.► M, -.k. ,,.A #,
. tea., ► xT� �" �} �'
�!•
+
M- }: �.•_
+tom ,�. ` a ,a
's' • , r:^�.� • :at•—
A -1-�- ei,.'.- - -'�/7'R
Ii7
'F t µ '� 1 •� ..iF!
�• "7.' L - .� �
"t1V
_
4
j
! �� 4 -
i
314
+.+ • 4
•
1
•?w .In x .A"DJ"".
,
r
•.i• ,. •
\
f} �- -i- . rhxr t .=ar
,' +�` .r-
ar48.
µ ....I.i
} T '., FL. ., "'#• ,. (
�, .,.. w''.;.r
fi "�/ '�/
Q# �".
'�" ice
'- .- _
Outfall 001
--5
�I
i
�
'y
�4
•�
rt +•
_
'
\
` ff
t
\
.'
}i i
.� +4
1:..
`'Y? al
•
+f Y
"-::••.14.7 • •
~ •�
'�
, r, . rt
CD��
. TV;76.
.r. •s
•
. r.,
•�"
'
r
..e,_ r .lw.
- tr ••4
/ u
4•:.i.• .y Ci7JLi "'�
`�• • .�• web
a ..' J4
Ik -� �a•4`
.n: v.-.W, 1
..J.-
/, ` ` :
`•c+ .
s �♦ '
�; c' ^—
/
i'- d �..
fib•
1. _.`J
— - / —(_
=_ _.art=
.-.-
—•
-�!.
.r�''' +' _ �- t
... -.._�...=f�_t�•,
+
(�
ram. ---� '�h
- «''�
•
`''� 1
~__ •' "p -
- �'...� :a V.�,/
U
., ��;.,;
•
3. �•
+ H!
.4r
•
•
r
(�
'-�a`
+
•,
•
( • • -� `
i l . _. \
�\. -`� `�
--•--/—\
/�r, .1." ..yi
�r — '''.. dry•
• ^`111 t t :n.iw,.!
Town of Fairmont
State Grid/Quad: J23NW Evergreen Latitude: 34° 26' 33" N
Longitude: 78° 57' 37" W
Receiving Stream: Lumber River Drainage Basin: Lumber River Basin
Stream Class: C-Sw Sub -Bad: 03-07-51
.. -
NPDES Permit No. NC0086550

Permit No. NC0086550
A. (1.) EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS AND MONITORING REQUIREMENTS
Beginning on the effective dateof this permit and lasting until permit expiration, the Permittee is
authorized to discharge treated wastewater from Outfall 001. Such discharges shall be limited and
monitored by the Permittee as specified below:
PARAMETER
EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS
MONITORING REQUIREMENTS
Monthly
Average
Weekly.
Average
Daily
Maximum
Measurement
Frequency
Sample Type
Sample
Location 1
Flow (MGD)
1.75
Continuous
Recording
I or E
BOD5 2
15.0 mg/L
22.5 mg/L
3/Week
Composite
I, E
Total Suspended Solids2
30.0 mg/L
45.0 mg/L
3/Week
Composite
I, E
NH3 as N
4.0 mg/L
12.0 mg/L
3/Week
Composite
E
Dissolved Oxygen
Daily average not less than 5.0 mg/L
3/Week
Grab
E
Fecal Coliform (geometric
mean)
200/100 ml
400/100 ml
3/Week
Grab
E
Total Residual Chlorines
28 µg/L
3/Week
Grab
E
Temperature °C
Daily
Grab
E
Total Nitrogen
•
Monthly
Composite
E
Total Phosphorus
Monthly
Composite
E
pH
Between 6.0 and 9.0 Standard Units
3/Week
Grab
E
Total Mercurys
Quarterly
Grab
E
Total Zinc
Quarterly
Composite
E
Total Copper
Quarterly
Composite
E
Chronic Toxicity6
Quarterly
Composite
E
Footnotes:
1. I: Influent. E: Effluent. See condition A. (2) of this permit for instream monitoring requirements.
2. The monthly average BOD5 and Total Suspended Solids concentrations shall not exceed 15% of the
respective influent value (85% removal).
3. Effluent monitoring and limitation only apply if chlorine or a chlorine derivative is added to the waste
stream during treatment.
4. For a given wastewater sample, TN = TKN + NO3-N + NO2-N, where TN is total nitrogen, TKN is
Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen, and NO3-N and NO2-N are nitrate and nitrite nitrogen, respectively.
5. Effluent samples collected for mercury must be analyzed by EPA Method 1631, beginning three
months after the permit effective date. The quantitation limit for Mercury shall be 0.0005 µg/L (0.5
ng/1). Levels reported less than 0.0005 µg/L will be considered zero for compliance purposes.
6. Chronic Toxicity (Ceriodaphnia) @ 2.2 %, February; May, August and November, see special
condition A. (3.) of this permit.
THERE SHALL BE NO DISCEIARGE OF FLOATING SOLIDS OR VISIBLE FOAM IN OTHER THAN TRACE
AMOUNTS.
Page 4

Permit No. NC0086550
A. (2.) INSTREAM MONITORING REQUIREMENTS
Instream monitoring is required for the following parameters at the locations specified:
EFFLUENT
CHARACTERISTICS
Measurement Frequency
Sample Type-
Sample.
Locations
Fecal Coliform
June -Sept
3/week
Grab
U, D
October -May
1/week
Dissolved Oxygen
June -Sept
3/week
Grab
U, D
October -May
1/week
Temperature
June -Sept
3/week
Grab
U, D
October -May
1/week
Footnotes:
1. U - Upstream at US Highway 74 Bridge, D- Downstream approximately 1,000 yards below Outfall 001.
A. (3.) CHRONIC TOXICITY PERMIT LIMIT (QRTRLY)
The effluent discharge shall at no time exhibit observable inhibition of reproduction or significant
mortality to Ceriodaphnia dubia at an effluent concentration of 2.2 %.
The permit holder shall perform at a minimum, quarterly monitoring using test procedures outlined
in the "North Carolina Ceriodaphnia Chronic Effluent Bioassay Procedure," Revised February
1998, or subsequent versions or "North Carolina Phase II Chronic Whole Effluent Toxicity Test
Procedure" (Revised -February 1998) or subsequent versions. The tests will be performed during the
months of February, May, August and November. Effluent sampling for this testing shall be
performed at the NPDES permitted final effluent discharge below all treatment processes.
If the test procedure performed as the first test of any single quarter results in a failure or ChV
below the permit limit, then multiple -concentration testing shall be performed at a minimum, in
each of the two following months as described in "North Carolina Phase II Chronic Whole
Effluent Toxicity Test Procedure" (Revised -February 1998) or subsequent versions.
The chronic value for multiple concentration tests will be determined using the geometric mean of
the highest concentration having no detectable impairment of reproduction or survival and the
lowest concentration that does have a detectable impairment of reproduction or survival. The
definition of "detectable impairment," collection methods, exposure regimes, and further
statistical methods are specified in the "North Carolina Phase II Chronic Whole Effluent Toxicity
Test Procedure" (Revised -February 1998) or subsequent versions.
All toxicity testing results required as part of this permit condition will be entered on the Effluent
Discharge Monitoring Form (MR-1) for the months in which tests were performed, using the
parameter code TGP3B for the pass/fail results and THP3B for the Chronic Value. Additionally,
DWQ Form AT-3 (original) is to be sent to the following address:
Page 5

Attention:
Permit No. NC0086550
NC DENR / DWQ / Environmental Sciences Branch
1621 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1621
Completed Aquatic Toxicity Test Forms shall be filed with the Environmental Sciences Branch no
later than 30 days after the end of the reporting period for which the report is made.
Test data shall be complete, accurate, include all supporting chemical/physical measurements and
all concentration/response data, and be certified by laboratory supervisor and ORC or approved
designate signature. Total residual chlorine of the effluent toxicity sample must be measured and
reported if chlorine is employed for disinfection of the waste stream.
Should there be no discharge of flow from the facility during a month in which toxicity
monitoring is required, the permittee will complete the information located at the top of the
aquatic toxicity (Al") test form indicating the facility name, permit number, pipe number, county,
and the month/year of the report with the notation of "No Flow" in the comment area of the
form. The report shall be submitted to the Environmental Sciences Branch at the address cited
above.
Should the permittee fail to monitor during a month in which toxicity monitoring is required,
monitoring will be required during the following month.
Should any test data from this monitoring requirement or tests performed by the North Carolina
Division of Water Quality indicate potential impacts to the receiving stream, this permit may be
re -opened and modified to include alternate monitoring requirements or limits.
NOTE: Failure to achieve test conditions as specified in the cited document, such as minimum
control organism survival, minimum control organism reproduction, and appropriate
environmental controls, shall constitute an invalid test and will require immediate follow-up
testing to be completed no later than the last day of the month following the month of the initial
monitoring.
A. (4.) MERCURY REOPENER
The Division may reopen this permit to require mercury load limitations, mercury minimization
plans, and/or source water characterization following completion of the Phase 2 Mercury TMDL
for the Lumber and Waccamaw River watersheds.
Page 6

Permit No. NC0086550
A. (5.) EFFLUENT POLLUTANT SCAN
The permittee shall perform an annual Effluent Pollutant Scan for all parameters listed in the table below (in
accordance with 40 CFR Part 136). The annual effluent pollutant scan samples shall represent seasonal (summer,
winter, fall, spring) variations over the 5-year permit cycle. Unless otherwise indicated, metals shall be analyzed as
"total recoverable." Additionally, the method detection level and the minimum level shall be the most sensitive as
provided by the appropriate analytical procedure.
Ammonia (as N)
Chlorine (total residual, TRC)
Trans- 1,2-dichlornethylene
1,1-dichloroethylene
Bis (2-chloroethyl) ether
Bis (2-chloroisopropyl) ether
Dissolved oxygen 1 2-dichloropropane Bis (2-ethylhexyl) phthalate
Nitrate/Nitrite 1,3-dichloropropylene 4-bromophenyl phenyl ether
Total Kjeldahl nitrogen Ethylbenzene Butyl benzyl phthalate
Oil and grease Methyl bromide 2-chloronaphthalene
Total Phosphorus Methyl chloride 4-chlorophenyl phenyl ether
Total dissolved solids Methylene chloride Chrysene
Hardness 1,1,2,2-tetrachloroethane Di-n-butyl phthalate
Antimony Tetrachloroethylene Di-n-octyl phthalate
Arsenic Toluene Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
Beryllium 1,1,1-trichloroethane 1,2-dichlorobenzene
Cadmium 1,1,2-trichloroethane 1,3-dichlorobenzene
Chromium Trichloroethylene 1,4-dichlorobenzene
Copper Vinyl chloride 3,3-dichlorobenzidine
Lead Add -extractable compounds: Diethyl phthalate
Mercury P-chloro-m-cresol Dimethyl phthalate
Nickel 2-chlorophenol 2,4-dinitrotoluene
Selenium 2,4-dichlorophenol 2,6-dinitrotoluene
Silver 2,4-dimethylphenol I ,2-diphenylhydrazine
Thallium 4,6-dinitro-o-cresol Fluoranthene
Zinc 2,4-dinitrophenol Fluorene
Cyanide 2-nitrophenol Hexachlorobenzene
Total phenolic compounds 4-nitrophenol Hexachlorobutadiene
Volatile organic compounds: Pentachlorophenol Hexachlorocyclo-pentadiene
Acrolein Phenol Hexachloroethane
Acrylonitrile 2,4,6-trichlorophenol Inden o(1,2,3-cd)pyrene
Benzene Base -neutral compounds lsophorone
Bromoform Acenaphthene Naphthalene
Carbon tetrachloride Acenaphthylene Nitrobenzene
Chlorobenzene Anthracene N-nitrosodi-n-propylamine
Chlorodibromomethane Benzidine N-nitrosodimethylamine
Chloroethane Benzo(a)anthracene N-ni trosodiphenylamine
2-chloroethyl vinyl ether Benzo(a)pyrene Phenanthrene
Chloroform 3,4 benzolluoranthene Pyrene
Dichtorobromomethane Benzo(ghi)perylene 1,2,4-trichlorobenzene
1,1-dichloroethane Benzo(k)tluoranthene
1,2-dichloroethane Bis (2-chloroethoxy) methane
Test results shall be reported to the Division in DWQ Form- DNIR-PPA1 or in a form approved by the Director,
within 90 days of sampling. A copy of the report shall be submitted to Central Files to the following address:
Division of Water Quality, Water Quality Section, 1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617.
Page 7

DENR/DW Q
FACT SHEET FOR NPDES PERMIT DEVELOPMENT
NPDES No. NC0086550
Facility Information
Applicant/Facility Name:
Town of Fairmont / Fairmont Regional WWTP
Applicant Address:
P.O. Box 248, Fairmont, NC 28340
Facility Address:
S. R. 2312 near Town of Boardman
Permitted Flow (MGD):
1.75
Type of Waste:
100 % Domestic
Facility Classification:
III
Permit Status:
Renewal
County::..:... _ ,.:
Robeson
Miscellaneous
Receiving Stream:
Lumber River
Regional Office:
FRO
Stream: Classification:
C-Sw
State. Grid/ USGS Quad:
J23NW / Evergreen
303(d): Listed?
TIVIDL?
Yes
Yes
Permit Writer:
Teresa Rodriguez
Basin/Subbasin:
03-07-51
Date:
6/16/04
Drainage Area (m0):
1228
. k. t -
w �� •4 �` -".4 ,
K.33. 5.Jii)_— sa ` , zY�1
a�h,. "r a..
Lat. 34° 26' 33" N Long. 78° 57' 37" W
Summer 7Q10 (cfs)
...
122
Wtnter 7010 (cfs):
250
30Q2 (cfs)
304
Average Flow (cfs):
1300
IWC (%):
2.2
Summary: The Town of Fairmont submitted a permit application on January 30, 2004. This is a recently
built facility that started service in 2002. The facility has a capacity of 1.75 MGD and consists of a
mechanical bar screen, grit chamber, influent pump station, dual aeration basins, secondary and tertiary
clarifiers, gravity thickener, aerobic digesters, chlorination, dechlorination and cascade aerator. They
received sanitary wastewater from Orrum Middle School and have plans to tie in several schools and smaller
municipalities in the area.
Pre -Treatment: The Town does not have a pretreatment program. Before any industrial flow is accepted the
Town shall developed and implement a pretreatment program.
Receiving Stream: The Lumber River is listed as impaired for mercury. A Phase I TMDL was approved by
EPA in October 2001. NPDES facilities will collect mercury data to assist in the Phase II mercury TMDL
development. The Lumber River is classified as excellent for benthic microinvertebrates upstream of the
discharge. The River will be monitored for mercury fish tissue concentrations as part of the Phase I TMDL.
DMR Review: The facility commenced the discharge in June 2002. Data was reviewed for the period of June
2002 to April 2004. Average flow was 0.501 MGD, BOD averaged 3 mg/1 and TSS averaged 4.5 mg/1. The
facility has met all effluent limitations thus far.
Effluent Toxicity: The permit requires quarterly Chronic Toxicity Testing (Ceriodaphnia) at an effluent
concentration of 2.2 %. They have passed all the toxicity tests since June 2002.
Fact Sheet
NPDES NC0086550

Priority Pollutant Scan: Results of three PPAs were submitted with the application for renewal. The tests
were conducted on three consecutive days in January 2004. The following parameters were detected: Total
Phenolics (20.76 µg/1), Chloroform (8.07 µg/1), Copper (5 µg/1), and Cyanide (7 µg/l). The Division has
established an acceptable detection level for cyanide of 10 µg/1, samples with detections below 10 1.1g/1 are
considered as < 10µg/1. Zinc was detected above the action level standard of 50 µg/1 (145 µg/l, 137 µg/1 &
155 µg/1). Copper was detected just below the action level standard of 7 µg/l. Monitoring for Total Zinc and
Total Copper will be included in the permit.
SUMMARY OF PROPOSED CHANGES
Permit Condition
Proposed Changes
Comments
Ammonia
Weekly Average limit of
12 mg/1
40 CFR 122 Federal requirements and Division
Policy require weekly limits for ammonia.
Mercury
Quarterly monitoring
Mercury Permitting Strategy for the Lumber River
Basin.
Zinc
Quarterly monitoring
Zinc was detected in the PPA in amounts greater
than the action level standard.
Copper
Quarterly monitoring
Monitoring is included to collect data to evaluate
reasonable potential.
Conductivity
Eliminate effluent and
instream monitoring
Facilities discharging only domestic wastewater do
not need to monitor for conductivity.
Effluent Pollutant
Analysis
Yearly testing
This condition is been added to all municipal
facilities above 1 MGD to collect data necessary
for permit renewal.
Outfall location
Corrected latitude and
longitude
Latitude and longitude were changed to reflect the
actual location of the discharge.
PROPOSED SCHEDULE FOR PERMIT ISSUANCE
Draft Permit to Public Notice:
Permit Scheduled to Issue:
June 23, 2004
August 16, 2004
Fact Sheet
NPDES NC0086550

NPDES DIVISION CONTACT
If you have questions regarding any of the above information or on the attached permit, please contact Teresa
Rodriguez at [phone] ext. 553.
NAME:
REGIONAL OFFICE COMMENTS
DATE: / 5/C'
NAME: DATE:
SUPERVISOR: DATE:
Fact Sheet
NPnF.0 MrnnRMMin

02/06/2009 17:09 91062136025 TOWN OF FAIRMONT PAGE 01/12
TOWN OF FArRmoNT
FAIRMONT,
1108211.0004
FAX -
sand tm
n1
�n�
12J; 1( J`L.QC Q—
OM°. imam
Flu nuinfor:
OfIlas
a Urgent a►.AP 0
Total prt/M, bi emir l 9\
Mem

02/06/2009 17:09 9106286025
TOWN OF FAIRMONT PAGE 02/12
BIOSOLIDS MANAGEMENT SERVICE AGREEMENT
This SERVICE AGREEMENT (hereinafter called the AGREEMENT) made and entered into
this 15th day of June 2U07 (the EFFECTIVE DATE) by and between the Town of Fairmont, NC
(hereinafter called CUSTOMER), and Synagro Central, LLC, (hereinafter called CONTRACTOR
which term shall include its successors told assigns).
WITNESSETH:
hi consideration of the following covenants and ACTRF.FM1 NTS, the CUSTOMER and the
CONTRACTOR hereby mutually agree as follows:
1. SCOPE
1.1. The CONTRACTOR shall provide biosol.ids management services that include
removal, transportation, and land application or other beneficial reuse in accordance with the
terms of this A(UREEMEN'1' (hereinafter called SERVICES) of the CUSTOMER'S biosolids
which constitute primarily (liquid semi -solids) residue generated during the treatment of
wastewalu (hereinafter called BIOSOLIDS) at treatment plant located in Ornun, North
Carolina (the PLANT).
2. CONTRACTOR OBLIGATIONS
The CONTRACTOR shall:
2.1. Within four (4) weeks after receipt of notice from CUSTOMER, cause the removal,
transportation, and land 'application of CUSTOMER'S BIOSOLIDS and, in connection
with such activities, maintain AUTHORIZATIONS and landowner AGREEMENTS
required of CONTRACTOR for agricultural land application and/or disturbed land
reclamation in accordance with all applicable LEGAL REQUIREMENTS MENTS which are
currently in effect, or which take effect during the term of this AGREEMENT.
2.2_ At the written request of CUSTOMER, and as applicable, provide any
AUTHORIZATIONS which are issued by applicable GOVERNMENTAL
AUTHORITIES for all land approved for BIOSOLIDS land application.
2.3. Notify the CUSTOMER of any notice of violation, action, suit, claim, or legal
proceeding against CONTRACTOR relating to any aspect of the CUSTOMER'S
BIOSOLIDS managed pursuant to this AGREEMENT.
2.4. For BIOSOLJDS which are land applied, employ land application methods approved
or allowed by applicable GOVERNMENTAL AUTHORITIES:
Town of Fairmont, NC — Ave:mail — 06 15 07
-t-

02/06/2009 17:09 9106286025
TOWN OF FAIRMONT PAGE 03/12
2.5. Develop and implement monitoring, record keeping, and reporting programs as
required by applicable LEGAL REQUIREMENTS, and as set forth in Section 6 of
this AGREEMENT.
2.6. Provide proof of liability insurance, as set forth in Section 4 of this AGREEMENT.
2.7. . Indwiiui.Cy, CUSTOMER, and hold harmless CUSTOMER, its subsidiaries, affiliates,
successors and assigns and their respective directors, officers, employees,
shareholders, representatives and agents (hereinafter referred to collectively in this
section as CUSTOMER INDEMNITEES) from and against any and all claims,
liabilities;lawsuits, and causes of action, together with reasonable costs, expenses, and
attorneys' fees associated therewith and all amounts paid in defense or settlement of
the foregoing, which may be imposed upon or incurred by CUSTOMER
INDEMNITEES or asserted against CUSTOMER INDEMNITEES by any other
person or persons (including GOVERNMENTAL AUTIIORII'IES), to the extent
caused by CONTRACTOR'S breach of its obligations under this AGREEMENT or
violation of applicable LEGAL REQUIREMENTS.
2.8. Comply in all material respects with all LEGAL REQUIREMENTS applicable to
CONTRACTOR'S provision of the SERVICES.
2.0. CONTRACTOR'S obligations to take, receive or beneficially reuse 13TOSOLIDS shall
be suspended during a Force Majeure.
3. CUSTOMER
The CUSTOMER shall:
3.1. Provide to CONTRACTOR for off -site beneficial reuse of 100% of all liquid
BIOSOLIDS generated at the PLANT.
3.2. Provide CONTRACTOR with reasonable access to the CUSTOMER'S BIOS OL D'S
delivery system, except as reasonably required for safety or emergency considerations,
or planned shutdown of the PLANT. It is agreed that when safety, emergency or
shutdown conditions prevent access, that both parties will attempt to resolve such
conditions as expeditiously as possible.
3.3. Provide CONTRACTOR written notice of the concentration oftotal nitrogen (as N on
a dry weight basis) in the BIOSOLIDS which CUSTOMER provides, plus all other
information which CONTRACTOR may request to facilitate its compliance with
applicable LEGAL REQUIREMENTS, including without limitation the requirements
of 40 C.F.R. Part 503. Information which CONTRACTOR may obtain shall include,
without limitation, the monthly average concentrations (in milligrams per kilogram) of
arsenic, cadmium, copper, lead, mercury, nickel, selenium, and zinc or other
Town of Fairmont, NC — Agreement — 06 15 07
-2-

02/06/2009 17:09 9108286025
TOWN OF FAIRMONT PAGE 04/12
potentially Hazardous Materials present in the BIOSOL.IDS, the level of pathogen
reduction which CUSTOMER has achieved, and the method of vector attraction
reduction which CUSTOMER has applied. The methods and procedures by which
CUSTOMER samples and analyzes concentrations of potentially HAZARDOUS
MATERIALS, pathogen reduction, and vector altructiou reduction, shall comply with
methods and procedures prescribed by applicable LEGAL REQUIREMENTS,
including without limitation 40 C.F.R. Part 503. CUSTOMER shall provide
CONTRACTOR with a certification regarding concentrations of HAZARDOUS
MATERIALS, pathogen reduction, and vector attraction reduction, as well as
certification that all methods and procedures used by customer for the sampling and
analysis of 13TOSOLIDS comply with requirements of 40 C.F.R. Part 503, and any
other applicable LEGAL REQUIREMENTS. The forme of certification, and the type
of information which the CONTRACTOR may request from CUSTOMER may
include the form of certification or the type of information which CUSTOMER must
maintain under 40 C.F.R. § 503.17. CONTRACTOR shall have the undisputed right
to rely upon any zntOrmation or certification provided by CUSTOMER, and shall not
have any independent duty to investigate or inquire regarding the subject matter of the
CUSTOMER'S certification or of the information which CUSTOMER provides to
CONTRACTOR.
3.4. Not provide to CONTRACTOR any BIOSOLIDS which contain HAZARDOUS
• MATERIAL or are hazardous in accordance with 40 C.F.R. Part 261, other federal
law, state law, or which contains a concentration of polychlorinated biphenyls equal to
or greater than 50 milligrams per kilogram of total solids (on a dry weight basis).
3.5. Provide CONTRACTOR with at Ieast four (4) weeks advance notice of when
CUSTOMER desires for CONTRACTOR to remove BIOSOLIDS from the PLANT.
3.6. Indemnify, defend, and protect CONTRACTOR from and against all claims, damages,
losses, costs, suits, settlements, causes of action, liabilities (INCLUDING
WITHOUT LIMITATION STRICT LIABILITIES) .fizzes, penalties, costs, and
expenses (including but not limited to, investigation and legal expenses, and costs and
expenses associated with Remedial Work) (collectively, CLAIMS) arising out of or in
connection with any acts or omissions of CUSTOMER, or its employees, officers,
directors, representatives, contractors, subcontractors, agents, or affiliates, or any
licensee or invitee of the PLANT (other than CONTRACTOR), or CUSTOMER'S
breach of any of its ohlizatinns under this AGREEMENT, or any violation of any
applicable LEGAL REQUIREMENT by CUSTOMER or any of its employees,
officers, directors, representatives, agents, contractors, subcontractors, or affiliates, or
its licensees or invitees (other than CONTRACTOR) or any discrepancy in the
character or composition of the BIOSOLIDS from the PLANT compared to analytical
results, certifications or other information provided by CUSTOMER to
CON 1 KACTOR.
Town of Fairmont, NC — agreement — 06 15 07
- 3 -

02,/06/2009 17:09 9106286025
TOWN OF FAIRMONT PAGE 05/12
3.7. From time to time, as requested by CONTRACTOR, review a list of proposed land
application sites at which BIOSOLIDS from the PLANT may be applied, and select
from such sites those sites to which CUSTOMER desires for its BIOSOLIDS to be
applied, and such sites to which it does not desire its BIOSOLIDS to be applied. In
the absence of specific designations by CUSTOMER, CUSTOMER agrees that it shall
have been deemed to select any and/or all of such application as satisfactory locations
for its BIOSOLIDS.
3.8. Notify the CONTRACTOR of operating changes or any other conditions that would
reasonably be expected to affect the BIOSOLIDS handled by CONTRACTOR under
this AGREEMENT.
4. INSURANCE
The CONTRACTOR shall maintain and provide the CUSTOMER evidence of insurance as
follows:
4.1. Worker's Compensation meeting at least thetninirnurn requirements of the laws of the
State of North Carolina, and Employer's Liability with a minimum single limit of
$1,000,000.
4.2. Commercial General Liability and Automobile Liability Insurance to include premises
operations and subcontractors. Completed Operations and Contractual Liability are to
be included under the Commercial General Liability coverage_ The insurance policies
will have limits of no less than $1,000,000.00 per occurrence aid $ 2,009,000.00
aggregate. CUSTOMER shall be named as an additional insured.
5. PAYMENT
The CONTRACTOR shall provide the CUSTOMER with an accounting of the gallons of
BIOSOLIDS removed from the CUSTOMER'S PLANT. CONTRACTOR will utilize a
measurement method based on the number of tanker loads of BIOSOLIDS removed from the
CU STOMERS'S PLANT and the capacity, in gallons, of the tankers. The CUSTOMER will
be provided with truck logs for all loads removed by the CONTRACTOR.
5.1. The CONTRACTOR shall submit invoices once each month for SERVICES provided
by CONTRACTOR, using the rates and the amounts agreed in Section 10 of this
AGREEMENT. The CUSTOMER shall pay all invoices within 30 days after receipt
of the invoice.
5.2. It is agreed that in the event of any dispute concerning invoice amount, CUSTOMER
will pay undisputed invoice amounts within 30 days after receipt of the invoice_
Town of Fairmont, NC — Agreement 06 15 07
-4-

02/06/2009 17:09 9106286025
TOWN OF FAIRMONT PAGE 06/12
6. RECORD KEEPING
The CONTRACTOR shall maintain records and submit summary reports to the
CUSTOMER after each hauling event (as requested by CUSTOMER) and on an annual,
cumulative basis. Reports shall include information regarding, but not be limited to:
6.1. Number ()Clouds trattspoxted and applied with identification of utilization site(s).
6.2. Such other information as will reasonably allow CT ISTOMRR to fulfill its
recordkeeping and reporting requiements under applicable LEGAL
REQUIREMENTS.
7. NOTICES
Except as otherwise provided herein, any notice, demand or other communication shall be in
writing and shall be personally served, sent by commercial courier service or prepaid
registered or certified mail, or sent by telephonic facsimile delivery with confirmation
thereof. Any such notice shall be deemed communicated upon receipt-
7.1. The following address is hereby designated as the legal address of the
CONTRACTOR. Such address inay be changed at any time by notice in writing
delivered to CUSTOMER.
Synagro Central, LLC
7014 E. Baltimore Street
Baltimore, MD 21224
[phone]
Fax: [phone]
Attn: Stephen R. Ton
With a copy to:
Alvin L. Thomas II, General Counsel
Synagro Technologies, Inc.
1800 Bering Drive, Suite 1000
Houston, Texas 77057
[phone]
Fax: [phone]
7.2. The following address is hereby designated as the legal address of the CUSTOMER.
Such address may be changed at any time by notice in writing delivered to
CONTRACTOR.
Name: Town of Fairmont
Street Address: P. 0. Box 248
Town of Fairmont, NC — Agreement — 06 15 07
-5-

02/06/2009 17:09 9106286025
TOWN OF FAIRMONT PAGE 07/12
Mailing Address: Farimont, NC 28340
Phone Number: [phone]
Contact Person: Blake Proctor, Town Manager
Fax: [phone]
8. FORCE MAJEURE
Wherever the word "Force Majeure" is used, it should be understood to mean:
8.1. acts of God, landslides, lightning, earthquakes, hurricanes, tornadoes, blizzards and
other adverse and inclement weather, fires, explosions, floods, ants of a public enemy,
wars, blockades, insurrections, riots or civil disturbances;
8.2. labor disputes, strikes, Work slowdowns, or Work stoppages;
8.3. orders or judgements of any Federal., State or local court, administrative agency or
governmental body, if not the result of willful or negligent action of the party relying
thereon;
8.4. power failure and outages affecting the Premises; and
8.5. any other similar cause or event, including a change in law, regulation, ordinance or
permit, provided that the foregoing is beyond the reasonable control of the party
claiming Force Majcure.
If, because of Force Majeure any party's cost is increased by more than 15% or any party
hereto is rendered unable, wholly or in part, to carry out its obligations under this Contract,
then such party shall give to the other party prompt written notice of the Force Majeure with
reasonable full details concerning it; thereupon the obligation ofthe party giving the notice, so
far as they are affected by the Force Majeure, shall be suspended during, but no longer than,
the continuance oftlie k'orce Majeure. The affected party shall use all possible diligence to
remove the Force majeure as quickly as possible, but his obligation shall not be deemed to
require the settlement of any strike, lockout, or other labor difficulty contrary to the wishes of
the party involved. If, because of. Force Majeure Synagro's cost is increased then
CUSTOMER agrees to increase the price paid to Synagro to.cover those increased costs for
the duration of the Force Majeure_ However, if because of Force Majeure Synagro's cost is
increased by more than 15% then CUSTOMER may suspend performance for the duration of
the Force Majeure.
Town of Fairmont, NC — Agreement— 06 15 07
•6•

02/06/2009 17:09 9106286025
TOWN OF FAIRMONT PAGE 08/12
9. TERM
9.1. This AGREEMENT shall be effective from the EFFECTIVE DATE until the 14th day
of June, 2012 (the INITIAL TERM). At the end of this term, this AGREEMENT
may be extended on a yearly basis as mutually agreed in writing by both parties.
Either party may terminate this AGREEMENT and shall have no further obligations to
other under this AGREEMENT if (i) the other party fails to observe of per.Car.um any
material covenant or agreement contained in this agreement for ten (10) business days
after written notice thereof has been given to such other party or (ii) at any time upon
the insolvency of the other party, or the institution by or against the other party of any
proceeding in bankruptcy or insolvency or for the appointment of a receiver or tnrstee
or for an assignment for the benefit of creditors.
9.2. CONTRACTOR may terminate this AGREEMENT at any time upon written notice to
CUSTOMER and have no further obligation to CUSTOMER if:
9.2.1. The CONTRACTOR is unable toutilize the BIOSOLIDS due to a change in
any LEGAL REQUIREMENTS that renders the SERVICES illegal, or place
such restrictions or requirements thereon so as to make the provision of the
SERVICES cost prohibitive or to otherwise frustrate ait,: conunereial ii 1eut of
this AGREEMENT.
9.2.2. The BIOSOLIDS become unsuitable for land application by the
CONTRACTOR by reason of (i) the act or omission of any third party or
CUSTOMER, and through no fault of CONTRACTOR, or (ii) the condition
of the RTOSOLIDS is materially inconsistent with the description and
analysis, certifications or other information the CUSTOMER has provided to
the CONTRACTOR regarding the BIOSOLIDS, including analytical results
attached in Exhibit A, or (iii) CUSTOMER breaches its obligations
hereunder regarding the quality of the BIOSOLIDS.
9.3. In the event of any change in federal, state or local law or regulation, or any change in
any one of CONTRACTOR'S permits, which is implemented during the Term of this
AGREEMENT and which results in a significant increase or, decrease in the cost of
poi -fowling the SERVICES, the CUSTOMER and CONTRACTOR agree to
negotiate a mutually agreeable adjustment to that payment terms specified in this
AGREEMENT. Should agreement not be reached, either party may terminate this
AGREEMENT as specified in Article 9.
Town of Fairmont, NC - Agreement - 06 15 07
-7-

02/06/2009 17:09 9106286025
TOWN OF FAIRMONT PAGE 09/12
10. PRICE
10.1, Except as otherwise provided in this AGREEMENT, CUSTOMER will pay the
following fixed prices for CONTRACTOR'S SERVICES hereunder for the duration
of the INMAL TERM of this Agreement
Provide ORC and Backup ORC for land application - $1,200.00 per year
Mobilization/Demobilization - $1,500.00 per event
Lime Stabilization — cost plus 150/0
Compliance Sampling — cost plus 15%
Al -lime (if needed) — cost plus 15%
Land permitting (if needed) - $25.00 per acre
Permit Renewal - $750.00lump sum
Liquid land application
Miles one way
0 —10
11 —15
16-20
21-25
Rate per gallon
$0.0395
$0.0425
$0.0455
$0.0485
10.2. Upon increases in CONTRACTOR'S costs due to changes in LEGAL
REQUIREMENTS, CONTRACTOR may no more than once each anniversary year,
request an increase in the fixed prices set forth hereunder, which shall be negotiated
by the parties in good faith and be effective at the beginning of the next anniversary
of the EFFECTIVE DATE. In addition, the CONTRACTOR'S stated prices shall be
increased annually consistent with the Consumer Price Index (CPI) for the closest
metropolitan area to the PLANT. CPI adjustments shall automatically become
effective the anniversary date of the EFFECTIVE DATE.
11. MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS.
11.1. Assignment- The CUSTOMER and/or CONTRACTOR shall havc thc right to assign
this AGREEMENT in writing to any successor in interest, .subject to the written
approval of thc other party, which approval shall not be unreasonably withheld.
However, CONTRACTOR may assign its rights and duties to an affiliate or related
party of CONTRACTOR.
11.2. Governing Law. THIS AGREEMENT AND ALL THE RIGHTS AND DUTIES
OF THE PARTIES ARISING FROM OR RELATING IN ANY WAY TO THE
SUBJECT MATTER OF THIS AGREEMENT OR THE TRANSACTIONS
CONTEMPLATED BY IT, SHALL BE GOVERNED BY, CONSTRUED, AND
ENFORCED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF
NORTH CAROLINA.
Town of Fairmont, NC — Agreement — 06 15 07
-0-

02/06/2009 17:09 9106286025
TOWN OF FAIRMONT PAGE 10/12
11.3. Costs and Fees. The prevailing party in any legal proceeding brought by or against
the other party to enforce any provision or term of this AGREEMENT shall be entitled
to recover against the non -prevailing party the reasonable attorneys' fees, court costs
and other. expenses incurred by the prevailing party.
11.4. Consent to Breach Not Waiver. No term or provision hereof shall be deemed
waived and no breach excused, unless such waiver or consent be in writing and signed
by the party claimed to have waived or consented. No consent by any party to, or
waiver of, a breach by the other party shall constitute a consent to, waiver of, or
excuse of any other different or subsequent breach.
11.5. Severability. If any term or provision of this AGREEMENT should be declared
invalid by a court of competent jurisdiction, (i) the remaining terms and provisions of
this AGREEMENT shall be unimpaired, and (ii) the invalid term or provision shall be
replaced by such valid term or provision as comes'closest to the intention underlying
the invalid term or provision.
11.6. ENTIRE AGREEMENT. THIS AGREEMENT HERETO CONSTITUTE THE
COMPLETE AND EXCLUSIVE STATEMENT OF THE AGREEMENT
BETWEEN THE PARTIES WITH REGARD TO .THE MATTERS SET
FORTH HEREIN, AND IT SUPERSEDES ALL OTHER AGREEMENTS,
PROPOSALS, AND REPRESENTATIONS, ORAL OR WRITTEN, EXPRESS
OR IMPLIED, WITH REGARD THERETO_
11.7. Amendments. This AGREEMENT may be amended from time to time only by an
instrument in writing signed by the parties to this AGREEMENT.
11.8. Counterparts. This AGREEMENT maybe executed in counterparts, which together
shall constitute one and the same contract. The parties may execute more than one
copy of this AGREEMENT, each of which shall constitute an original.
12. DEFINITIONS
12.1. "AUTHORIZATIONS" means all authorizations, permits, applications, notices of
intent, registrations, variances, and exemptions, required for the removal,
transportation and land application ofBIOSOLIDS in compliance with all applicable
LEGAL REQUIREMENTS.
12.2. "BIOSOLIDS" means sewage sludge meeting Class B pathogen requirements, vector
attraction reduction requirements and pollutant concentrations (as defined by 40 Chit
Part 503 and State of North Carolina requirements for land application) that has
been dewatered at CUSTOMER'S expense to a minimum of 20% solids
Town of Fairmont, NC — Agreement— 06 15 07
-y-

0 /06/2009 17:09 9106286025
TOWN OF FAIRMONT PAGE 11/12
concentration. Biosolids do not include any hazardous materials or substance and
must be suitable for land application under the applicable law.
12.3. "ENVIRONMENTAL LAWS" means any AUTHORIZATION and any applicable
federal, state, or local law, rule, regulation, ordinance, order, decision, principle of
common law, consent decree or order, of any GOVERNMENTAL AUTHORITY,
now or hereafter in effect relating to IIAZARDOUS MATERIALS, BIOSOLIDS, or
the protection of the environment, health and safety, or a community's right to know,
including without limitation, the Comprehensive Environmental Response,
Compensation, and Liability Act, the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, the
Safe Drinking Water Act, the Clean Water Act, the Clean Air Act, the Emergency
Planning and Community Right to Know Act, the Hazardous Materials Transportation
Act, the Occupational Safety and Health Act, and any analogous state or local law.
12.4. "GOVERNMENTAL AUTHORITY" means any foreign governmental authority, the
United States of America, any State of the United States of America, any local
authority, and any political subdivision of any of the foregoing, and any agency,
department, commission, board, bureau, court, tribunal or any other governmental
authority having jurisdiction over this AGREEMENT, BIOSOLIDS, or COMPANY,
HAULER, or any of their respective assets, properties, sites, facilities or operations.
12.5. "HAZARDOUS MATERIALS" means any "petroleum," "oil," "hazardous waste,"
• "hazardous substance," "toxic substance," and "extremely hazardous substance" as
such terms are defined, listed, or regulated under ENVIRONMENTAL LAWS, or as
they become defined, listed, or regulated under ENVIRONMENTAL LAWS.
12.6. "LEGAL REQUIREMENT" means any AUTHORIZATION and any applicable
federal, state, or local law, rule, regulation, ordinance, order, decision, principle of
common law, consent decree or order, of any GOVERNMENTAL AUTHORITY,
now or hereafter in effect, including without limitation, ENVIRONMENTAL LAWS.
12.7. "REMEDIAL WORK" means investigation, monitoring, clean-up, containment,
removal, storage, remedial of restoration work associated with HAZARDOUS
MATERIALS or BIOS OLIDS.
Town of Fairmont, NC — Agrccmcnt — 06 15 07
- TO -

034/ 06/ 2009 17: 09
9106286025
TOWN OF FAIRMONT PAGE 12/12
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties of this AGREEMENT have hereunto set their hands and seals,
dated as of the day and year first herein written.
Town of Fairmont, North Carolina ("CUSTOMER")
ByA ALL P,1„
ATTEST
Name & Title:t`t' • `(IL)dow n 1 ` pnu -dame & Title:
Syuagro a1, LLC ("CONTRACTOR")
Bv:
Paucy)
[fin
j c n rK
Name & Title: Robert C. Boucher, President Name & Titre: Sue A. Gregory, Legal Manager
Town of Fairmont, NC — Agreement— 06 15 07
- 11 -