U6082_JD Request_Revised_07182019_signed

Appendix 2 - PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (PJD) FORM
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR PJD:
B. NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERSON REQUESTING PJD: Masan Herndon;NCooT Div.s;5501 Barbados Blvd,Castle Hayne,NC 28429
C. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER:
D. PROJECT LOCATION(S) AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
(USE THE TABLE BELOW TO DOCUMENT MULTIPLE AQUATIC RESOURCES AND/OR
AQUATIC RESOURCES AT DIFFERENT SITES)
State: North Carolina County/parish/borough: OnsIOW City: Jacksonville
Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format):
Lat.: 34.761505' N Long.: -77.399986' W
Universal Transverse Mercator: 18S 280341 3849220
Name of nearest waterbody: Sandy Run Branch
E. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
❑ Office (Desk) Determination. Date:
❑■ Field Determination. Date(s): July 11, 2019
TABLE OF AQUATIC RESOURCES IN REVIEW AREA WHICH "MAY BE" SUBJECT TO REGULATORY
JURISDICTION.
Site Latitude Longitude Estimated amount Type of aquatic Geographic authority
number (decimal (decimal of aquatic resource resource (i.e.,wetland to which the aquatic
degrees) degrees) in review area vs. non-wetland resource "may be"
(acreage and linear waters) subject (i.e., Section
feet, if applicable) 404 or Section 10/404)
Stream A 34.759951° N -77.402926' W 193 If Non-Wetland Water(RPW) Section 404
Stream B 34.7623920 N -77.401459' W 165 If Non-Wetland Water(RPW) Section 404
Stream C 34.7636210 N -77.399255' W 145 If Non-Wetland Water(RPW) Section 404

1) The Corps of Engineers believes that there may be jurisdictional aquatic resources in
the review area, and the requestor of this PJD is hereby advised of his or her option
to request and obtain an approved JD (AJD) for that review area based on an
informed decision after having discussed the various types of JDs and their
characteristics and circumstances when they may be appropriate.
2) In any circumstance where a permit applicant obtains an individual permit, or a
Nationwide General Permit (NWP) or other general permit verification requiring "pre-
construction notification" (PCN), or requests verification for a non-reporting NWP or
other general permit, and the permit applicant has not requested an AJD for the
activity, the permit applicant is hereby made aware that: (1)the permit applicant has
elected to seek a permit authorization based on a PJD, which does not make an
official determination of jurisdictional aquatic resources; (2) the applicant has the
option to request an AJD before accepting the terms and conditions of the permit
authorization, and that basing a permit authorization on an AJD could possibly result
in less compensatory mitigation being required or different special conditions; (3)the
applicant has the right to request an individual permit rather than accepting the terms
and conditions of the NWP or other general permit authorization; (4) the applicant can
accept a permit authorization and thereby agree to comply with all the terms and
conditions of that permit, including whatever mitigation requirements the Corps has
determined to be necessary; (5) undertaking any activity in reliance upon the subject
permit authorization without requesting an AJD constitutes the applicant's acceptance
of the use of the PJD; (6) accepting a permit authorization (e.g., signing a proffered
individual permit)or undertaking any activity in reliance on any form of Corps permit
authorization based on a PJD constitutes agreement that all aquatic resources in the
review area affected in any way by that activity will be treated as jurisdictional, and
waives any challenge to such jurisdiction in any administrative or judicial compliance
or enforcement action, or in any administrative appeal or in any Federal court; and (7)
whether the applicant elects to use either an AJD or a PJD, the JD will be processed
as soon as practicable. Further, an AJD, a proffered individual permit (and all terms
and conditions contained therein), or individual permit denial can be administratively
appealed pursuant to 33 C.F.R. Part 331. If, during an administrative appeal, it
becomes appropriate to make an official determination whether geographic
jurisdiction exists over aquatic resources in the review area, or to provide an official
delineation of jurisdictional aquatic resources in the review area, the Corps will
provide an AJD to accomplish that result, as soon as is practicable. This PJD finds
that there "may be"waters of the U.S. and/or that there "may be"navigable waters of
the U.S. on the subject review area, and identifies all aquatic features in the review
area that could be affected by the proposed activity, based on the following
information:

SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for PJD (check all that apply)
Checked items should be included in subject file. Appropriately reference sources
below where indicated for all checked items:
❑■ Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor:
Map: Attachment B-Figures 1 through 4,4A,4B
❑■ Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor.
❑ Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report.
❑ Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report. Rationale:
❑ Data sheets prepared by the Corps:
❑ Corps navigable waters' study:
❑ U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas:
❑m USGS NHD data.
❑ USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps.
❑■ U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name: 1:2,400 Jacksonville North (2016)
❑m Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation: ivRcs Soil survey of onsiow county(1992)
❑ National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name:
❑ State/local wetland inventory map(s):
❑ FEMA/FIRM maps:
❑ 100-year Floodplain Elevation is: .(National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929)
❑■ Photographs: ❑■ Aerial (Name & Date): NC OneMap Orthoimagery (2016)
or 0 Other (Name & Date): Representative Photographs (Attachment E)
❑ Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter:
❑ Other information (please specify):
IMPORTANT NOTE: The information recorded on this form has not necessarily
been verified by the Corps and should not be relied upon for later jurisdictional
determinations.
Signature and date of Signature and date of
Regulatory staff member person requesting PJD
completing PJD (REQUIRED, unless obtaining
the signature is impracticable)'
' Districts may establish timeframes for requestor to return signed PJD forms. If the requestor does not respond
within the established time frame, the district may presume concurrence and no additional follow up is
necessary prior to finalizing an action.

Lakewood D`ye �t A` Pumpkin"Cente N
�era�tS°c Cod O`rz s°��� It���
,lOr15 arty�iC
y SUnsetAcres
Aldersgate ��53 It
Z0,f '7.
', Branchwood %
,P �� Foxhorn V Kaye
C ° y 1P
04P Pine Hill
G °Li
LnnCJ Ar• -yb
Ile
i
C
eM* onslow Gardens
College Park
D°fg Awns �tal Country Club
Acres
US 17 I ��'� Coastal e
Sherwood Forest `oc�`� Carolina `fin
Houston Heights Communrry r�t�
CoYege �pJ
i —_
H_iwkside
_
° Acorn Forest ° 102.6 0
1p91°- o Country Club
° Co»ntrY ?° Hdls
° S a
Oak Grove
feet ° S p46
si r x
o
Fo
muff Dove $
ychDrye
1 c
° New Rover A
Z
Bell Fork Homes,
s+
a Brynn Marr ° C*
C, $
\l a
te1 Brynn r
Jacksonville a Brynr7Matrtioad �arROi
a
tetpuoe 8aulev t. NC 53
i� �a�fShOft' 1
Y e8%feyartl �e
Lefeune Bouleyarcl
— F —
0 0.25 0.5 1
mil"
h�os NORTH�q° Onslow County,NC Bell Fork Road(SR 1308)
9
4� Legend > ,- and Country Club Road/
Hargett Street(SR 1403)
O P55 17
Intersection Improvements
Project Study Area (� 58.3 Acres)
OK�ppSQo Jack_ Ile—1 Onslow County,NC
+- Wednesday,July 17,2019
STvj loo =
FIGURE 1
STV Engineers,Inc.Project No.
4019177
Drawu By: Checked By: Approved By: Sources:Open Street Map Vicinity Map
JLK WSB MAI

17
Legend N ST 1ao
Vr�
Project Study Area (- 58.3 acres) S
i
INSTITUTE OF �M - Delineated Perennial Stream
EARNING � , `-.v� � - Client:
-A Delineated Intermittent Stream of KOHTH �
9
acksonville /hQ�
0 500 1,000 2,000
Feet
OF iHRN
Project:
4 4
0 Stream c Bell Fork Road (SR 1308)
51PR C and Country Club Road/
Hargett Street (SR 1403)
Intersection Improvements
- --�` Stream B(Sandy Run Branch) Onslow County,NC
---- ., - =4 Title:
2A
TOPOGRAPHIC MAP
ON DR
�¢ 0 r2L J1 ti Ref. USGS 7.5 Minute Topographic
Quadrangle Map(Jacksonville North,NC)
Stream A �� USGS-The National Map
S w' `�R �.J nsl w C un ,N
d)
�
Q>
� � 5
Li
YpR�, ` f`0 CFtij�, Jacksonville North Qua
S'T Drawn By: Checked By:
o f� s� 1 �f JLK WSB
o O Approved By: Date:
2B \ MAI 7/17/2019
STV Inc. Project No.
4019177
c FIGURE 2

Legend
W E ' STV� 1aa
Project Study Area (- 58.3 acres) S `�
r f
�r- Delineated Perennial Stream , ►
Delineated Intermittent Stream j Client:
0 200 400 800
Feet 7
1 OP iHRN5�
f
Project:
Bell Fork Road (SR 1308)
and Country Club Road/
�► �� Hargett Street (SR 1403)
Intersection Improvements
Onslow County,NC
Title:
AZ
TOPOGRAPHIC MAP
� Ref. USGS 7.5 Minute Topographic
Quadrangle Map(Jacksonville North,NC)
USGS-The National Map
f
/ I f - nsl w C un ,N
C.�
N
� f
i
f Jacksonville North Qua
Drawn By: Checked By:
Stream B(Sandy Run Branch)
-4r M JLK WSB
o
Approved By: Date:
_ MAI 7/17/2019
• , STV Inc. Project No.
4019177
FIGURE 2A

f..- S 100
-lk
Stream A F Client:
OF NOHTy C'�9
g
f ♦ �� m OZ
• 1 � +� Op iHRN5
J
Project:
�+ Bell Fork Road (SR 1308)
_ and Country Club Road/
Hargett Street (SR 1403)
I % % +� _ _ Intersection Improvements
I Onslow County,NC
Title:
r
� :� ; ', � t f~•, TOPOGRAPHIC MAP
.� % 1
Ref. USGS 7.5 Minute Topographic
{ Quadrangle Map(Jacksonville North,NC)
t1 USGS-The National Map
� ~ n nsl w C un ,N
�•� �z_%� n 4 Jacksonville North Qua
Drawn By: Checked By:
JLK WSB
Legend W E _ Joe
�Q
`' Approved By: Date:
Project Study Area 58.3 acres) s ' MAI 7/17/2019
4\, - Delineated Perennial Stream k
STV Inc. Project No.
-M Delineated Intermittent Stream �� 4019177
0 200 400 800
Feet _ _ , ' IV FIGURE 213

I r V
Legend
1 - ' r r' � r ,r 7 I• 4� r��.r ,(\��{'T V 1D
W E 1 ` .`. • {±ti f.�•y
Project Study Area 58.3 acres) y �Fil:}
•� .f I
0 500 1,000 2,000
Client:
Feet },•� • , •.,F # ••J' r F #
1 i..`•+' IV
¢ PROF tyOHTFI C,�9
�'r 1• T- f I 'LF - r t g
10
o z
� ,{y ~ x••. r '4 r �.''r1 i •r } •1' '� b fi
r1 •.1 1 _ '.1 '. ' 1; •r'
Opp
• � # I�r �r .ry r � ••{ •_ y, _ .. � ti•. r.� �r r �r:'� � � � r�L •• f
Op
i •ff •, ram;r �[' r M•r _ L:Y -` r� _ •��_ f
r `� •'•Y��!/,r.1 �S•� • _{ ,•� r +• y 'i•� 1 .{•1� Iti�•. '' r'1ry}�r Project:
�`eJa r " •{• '* - +i'�+ ^•Y•Y r+, r r 1 •ti {.rl r % I*�'
•,il, f' ti, �e� •r,� f, r {r , .•� 's dhr '`-. .1 �;. •�}•may r - r -�'�' {1 - Bell Fork Road (SR 1308)
•' - - r m _ - � '•,�_ y�. . '� and Country Club Road/
1 - •{¢�, �fi ti 0 �.• •r � Lr f. r •• ' ti { l •r•• �.x�
.. y '� r 1 .• -, '.:. ;r � { r�} - Lr Stream- C +� ti,-1•• r.• ••' 'N • ' s r• .r Hargett Street (SR 1403)
Intersection Improvements
{- r r,� V• Y Ste • r•+' y -' �� •1
•; ' •r'v r�4• 4 �.yy�.Y �,r,�, � ?��{:. � �'•�'�.� � 1•� � } � � •ar�}r�'� Onslow County,NC
• } '. •v ,+_r Y��. ` 4 ��, �• ��.�r•, •} .;� rye�•r1,�4�. ,'. 5 , .T' }
++} 4 ref r Stream-B Sand Run Branch) VO r ..k ,} ~'-¢•� sr' Title:
r Y J.
NRCS SOILS
MAP
1992 Soil Survey (Sheet-24)
1 {
• 't, _ r1' '•1� - i+ �S }-� r r ' •ram' L r v 'r ti' F r_ Sources:NRCS Soil Survey of On slow County,NC(1992)
9 r I, �� ti• Stream- A f r r3 r 1 q Onslow County,N
1�¢ ,� -� Y7�h ~#r •� • '- � O�\ �: _ �. 6�,, nn ti tir'rTl} r .`• -ti�'' r L
258
+• � r r r f• � Q�I� ti' J�f � r � •r ti •�j
�Y. ; � •'�• _•1 y_ •� � •���� � Jf 1 y Y _ -..r,��.ti��•• 1 y��� 1�,� •r f ti �.
{'Y•:'-s , 1 r ti r F� I '" .• .' - .r LPip
��'' _ 0� 1 •r ,IrJ ..{
•�• i •C ' ?{ `r
' ' r L 4 •• ' ? - ~�~ ,5•, i• }, � ..1_f 7•- Drawn By: Checked By:
0L. IQL }
'�jt, .� - •''' {• r•r•, * h+ •1 Fp}� r • {1+y L• i ..$ tier•k f•{�'� f J LK WS B
VA
r Y rr}-• y
, •` '
r .r Orr.
� �_ _t F• IP , Approved B Date:
r y - � 4r : ',.t_, MAI 7/17/2019
r Al ti
r-7 L - Fillr._I�
-�•�y •�'• � - +L •,'�,.• -. ••� �'�^- �I- STV Inc. Project No.
Mapped Soil Units Within the PSA r$r �" 'V ti I Ur
'GpB Goldsboro-Urban land complex,0 to 5 percent slopes4019177
Mk Muckalee loam �f t,
r r.r .
Pn Pantego mucky loam - S -f
Ra Rains fine sandy loam,0 to 2 percent slopes,Atlantic Coast Flatwoodsley
Ur Urban land FIGURE 3

c N
Legend W ; E ST 100
Project Study Area (— 58.3 acres) S
F0 �, e
Potential Non-Wetland Waters of the US (Perennial Stream)
Potential Non-Wetland Waters of the US (Intermittent Stream) Client: OF ryOHTFJ V
h L o Pipe/Culvert
�' - • . 17 � .t� D A o z
°°s� '?:, -% ' ` �h� © • ,� �*� o Wetland Determination Data Point
Jlk, Opp M
`, 0 500 1,000 2,000
�'' Feet Project:
: f v
f 4f 7 y
�. 'k; . ��eti5� v� ! v' o Bell Fork Road (SR 1308)
and Country Club Road/
Hargett Street (SR 1403)
oCz ' '' Intersection Improvements
-
+ ca initial Non-Wetland �, Potential Non-Wetland s '_ ` Onslow County,NC
Pote � s: 1
A Waters of the US Waters of the US
s Stream B,Sandy Run Branch(-165 If) cC` Stream C(-145 If) f. •�
(34.762392°N,-77.401459°W) ♦�(a a (34.763621°N,-77.399255°W)
�'7r r 17 ��•�; w
APPROXIMATE
POTENTIAL WATERS
OF THE U.S.
� j AND WETLANDS
¢ 0 o� BOUNDARY MAP
{{Dr W Nuf#D�
_ �tl Source:NC OnelVap-Aerial Imagery(2016),NC
40 Center for Geographic Information and Analysis,NC
ty'elson pr; r a hfF�OS Notes:
1. The boundaries of potential jurisdictional
waters of the U.S.were approximated by STV
Engineers, Inc. during field reviews conducted
Potential Non-Wetland _ r 1 �A on June 12th and 13th, 2018. Potential
Waters of the US jurisdictional boundaries have been marked in
Stream A(—193 If) 14i� S� the field with pink survey tape and mapped
(34.759951° N,-77.402926°W) F' r`, o using a Trimble Geo7X hand-held GPS unit
capable of subfoot accuracy.This map is
p intended for planning purposes only.
St Bryan e� 2. The boundaries ofjurisdictional waters of
ate I i c �✓ the U.S. were verified by the U.S.Army Corps
of Engineers on July 11,2019.
SS Sp �� y
{'•i p ,f Cenre Drawn By: Checked By:
°'�a rst och J L K WS B
+cif �► " ln" '. ♦ r c ++� 7 .
Approved By: Date:
MAI 7/17/2019
or
STV Inc. Project No.
4019177
�.�•�,,a ti` ' a � FIGURE 4
6

Legend N c
W E J j•v ST ■
r 1ao
Project Study Area (� 58.3 acres) S f, '
Potential Non-Wetland Waters of the US Perennial Stream
( ) o } x T
Potential Non-Wetland Waters of the US (Intermittent Stream)
y rJ Client: o r
Pipe/Culvert ,`, V►�af 4 '°`` f r, N PROF N ""
Photograph Location q� r• n, +�
�• , i;
Wetland Determination Data Point
`
0 200 400 8004•
Feet
Project:
Bell Fork Road (SR 1308)
and Country Club Road/
� Hargett Street (SR 1403)
• - - v �'' ? ,' ti ;� a Intersection Improvements
Onslow County,NC
• - t ;� ;ryr:•.., w Title:
Potential Non-Wetland
' Jy Waters of the US APPROXIMATE
,.�; N
Stream C(—1451f) � :.'e. POTENTIAL WATERS
(34.763621°N,-77.399255°W)
mopAND WETLANDS
La .. m� o� �� Monk L� BOUNDARY MAP
U C 0
` Source:NC OnelVap-Aerial Imagery(2016),NC
ts? 4l A • Yr`M Center for Geographic Information and Analysis,NC
�.. Notes:
lry 1. The boundaries of potential jurisdictional
b-w'W's , " waters of the U.S.were approximated by STV
Engineers, Inc. during field reviews conducted
on June 12th and 13th, 2018. Potential
` Vill •, r •,�-, +` jurisdictional boundaries have been marked in
( _ the field with pink survey tape and mapped
_ ' f using a Trimble Geo7X hand-held GPS unit
... k,- capable of subfoot accuracy.This map is
intended for planning purposes only.
2. The boundaries of jurisdictional waters of
.♦ di ��,
. �4 � the U.S. were verified by the U.S.Army Corps
1 ` �r of Engineers on July 11,2019..
Potential Non-Wetland
Waters of the US r` i'�! + ti�
Stream B,Sandy Run Branch( 165 If) ! ��
V ,
(34.762392'N,-77.401459'W) 4 + / ;
- p � �; �� Drawn By: Checked By:
A .. �, +o f JLK WSB
low, /
Approved By: Date:
MAI 7/17/2019
V.
�: �, , � • -} � ,t STV Inc. Protect No.
,., 11N `� ' 4019177
411
Y FIGURE 4A

TVA 100
).
_ r
y y JYY1 '` Client:
71'9 r
Potential Non-WetlandWaters of the USJz
Stream A(—193 If) 4 , 4
+' (34.759951°N,-77.402926°W)
� A � .� A �
4
Project:
Bell Fork Road (SR 1308)
e
and Country Club Road/
�'_ ,� • #"� Hargett Street SR 1403
A- ". Intersection Improvements
Onslow County,NC
� e _ � •,� .,.-,�� �. � � _ R Title:
APPROXIMATE
POTENTIAL WATERS
OF THE U.S.
AND WETLANDS
BOUNDARY MAP
> l r 3
Source:NC OneMap-Aerial Imagery(2016),NC
r'•. r �A ' gym' Center for Geographic Information and Analysis,NC
a �,• Ol A Notes:
Q PO, 1. The boundaries of potential jurisdictional
waters of the U.S.were approximated by STV
l Engineers, Inc. during field reviews conducted
on June 12th and 13th, 2018. Potential
t•. , ,� jurisdictional boundaries have been marked in
rA the field with pink survey tape and mapped
Ile. using a Trimble Geo7X hand-held GPS unit
w r' capable of subfoot accuracy.This map is
intended for planning purposes only.
2. The boundaries of jurisdictional waters of
` the U.S. are subject to change following
N , _ ' verification by the U.S.Army Corps of
7IVLe end • Engineers.
`r W g 4 .`'
Project Study Area (- 58.3 acres) s Drawn By: Checked By:
�- Potential Non-Wetland Waters of the US (Perennial Stream) v, .� `.; �'' i; J
JLK WSB
"ti" Potential Non-Wetland Waters of the US Intermittent Stream ° ' ~ - '�'
( ) '� ; � . Approved By: Date:
Pipe/Culvert �`.i� . r MAI 7/17/2019
F Photograph Location ;; ►4 a ! +' /
STV Inc. Project No.
o Wetland Determination Data Point r` 404 r r . ,y
�• y { ,,. 4019177
0 200 400 800 6
/ • �.
A
Feet ,+tx,, ' r,'' {1r► ' ,� . . FIGURE 413
I ,
�!. Ae °rr

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: 06/12/2018 Project/Site:STIP U-6082 SR 1308/1403 Latitude: 34.759951° N
Intersection Improvements
Evaluator: Steven Busbee County: Onslow Longitude: -77.402926'W
Total Points: Stream Determination (circle one) Other Stream A
Stream is at least intermittent 29.5 Ephemera ntermitten Perennial e.g. Quad Name:
if>_ 19 or perennial if>_30
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = 12 ) Absent Weak Moderate Strong
,a,Continuity of channel bed and bank 0 1 2 3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg 0 1 2 3
3. In-channel structure: ex. riffle-pool, step-pool, 0 O 2 3
ripple-pool sequence
4. Particle size of stream substrate 0 1 2 3
5.Active/relict floodplain 0 1 C= 3
6. Depositional bars or benches 0 1 2 3
7. Recent alluvial deposits 0 1 2 3
8. Headcuts Cm0 1 2 3
9. Grade control 0 0.5 1 1.5
10. Natural valley 0 0.5 1 1.5
11. Second or greater order channel No=0 Yes=3
a artificial ditches are not rated;see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = 7.5 )
12. Presence of Baseflow 0 1 3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria 0 1 2 3
14. Leaf litter 1.5 1 0.5 0
15. Sediment on plants or debris 0 0.5 1 1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles 0 0.5 1 1.5
17. Soil-based evidence of high water table? No=0 es=
C. Biology Subtotal = 10
18. Fibrous roots in streambed 3 <Z 2 1 0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed 0 2 1 0
20. Macrobenthos(note diversity and abundance) 0 1 2 3
21.Aquatic Mollusks 0 1 2 3
22. Fish 0 0.5 1 1.5
23. Crayfish 0 0.5 < 1 1.5
24.Amphibians 0 0.5 1 1.5
25.Algae <7 0 0.5 1 1.5
26.Wetland plants in streambed FACW=0.75; OB = 1.5 her=0
"perennial streams may also be identified using other methods.See p.35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch:

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: 06/13/2018 Project/Site:STIP U-6082 SR 1308/1403 Latitude: 34.763621° N
Intersection Improvements
Evaluator: Steven Busbee County: Onslow Longitude: -77.399255'W
Total Points: Stream Determination (circle one) Other Stream C
Stream is at least intermittent 25.5 Ephemera ntermitten Perennial e.g. Quad Name:
if>_ 19 or perennial if>_30
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = 10 ) Absent Weak Moderate Strong
,a,Continuity of channel bed and bank 0 1 275 3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg 0 1 2 3
3. In-channel structure: ex. riffle-pool, step-pool, 0 O 2 3
ripple-pool sequence
4. Particle size of stream substrate 0 1 2 3
5.Active/relict floodplain 0 1 < 2 3
6. Depositional bars or benches 0 C. 1 2 3
7. Recent alluvial deposits 0 1 2 3
8. Headcuts Cm0 1 2 3
9. Grade control 0 0.5 1 1.5
10. Natural valley 0 0.5 C 1 1.5
11. Second or greater order channel No=0 Yes=3
a artificial ditches are not rated;see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = 6.5 )
12. Presence of Baseflow 0 0 2 3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria 0 1 2 3
14. Leaf litter 1.5 1 0.5 0
15. Sediment on plants or debris 0 0.5 1 1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles 0 0.5 1 1.5
17. Soil-based evidence of high water table? No=0 es=
C. Biology Subtotal = g
18. Fibrous roots in streambed 3 2 1 0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed 0 2 1 0
20. Macrobenthos(note diversity and abundance) 0 C1 2 3
21.Aquatic Mollusks 0 1 2 3
22. Fish 0 0.5 0 1.5
23. Crayfish C= 0.5 1 1.5
24.Amphibians 0 0.5 1 1.5
25.Algae 0 0.5 1 1 1.5
26.Wetland plants in streambed FACW=0.75; OB = 1.5 her=0
"perennial streams may also be identified using other methods.See p.35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch:

NC SAM FIELD ASSESSMENT RESULTS
Accompanies User Manual Version 2.1
USACE AID#: NCDWR#:
INSTRUCTIONS: Attach a sketch of the assessment area and photographs. Attach a copy of the USGS 7.5-minute topographic quadrangle,
and circle the location of the stream reach under evaluation. If multiple stream reaches will be evaluated on the same property, identify and
number all reaches on the attached map,and include a separate form for each reach. See the NC SAM User Manual for detailed descriptions
and explanations of requested information. Record in the "Notes/Sketch"section if supplementary measurements were performed. See the
NC SAM User Manual for examples of additional measurements that may be relevant.
NOTE EVIDENCE OF STRESSORS AFFECTING THE ASSESSMENT AREA(do not need to be within the assessment area).
PROJECT/SITE INFORMATION:
STIP U-6082 SR1308/1403
1. Project name(if any): Improvements 2. Date of evaluation: 6/12/18
3.Applicant/owner name: NCDOT Division 3 4.Assessor name/organization: S. Busbee
5. County: Onslow 6. Nearest named water body
7. River basin: White Oak on USGS 7.5-minute quad: Sandy Run Branch
8. Site coordinates(decimal degrees, at lower end of assessment reach): 34.759951 N; -77.402926 W
STREAM INFORMATION: (depth and width can be approximations)
9. Site number(show on attached map): Stream A 10. Length of assessment reach evaluated(feet): 50
11. Channel depth from bed(in riffle, if present)to top of bank(feet): 2 ❑Unable to assess channel depth.
12. Channel width at top of bank(feet): 5 13. Is assessment reach a swamp steam? ❑Yes ®No
14. Feature type: ❑Perennial flow ®Intermittent flow ❑Tidal Marsh Stream
STREAM CATEGORY INFORMATION:
15. NC SAM Zone: ❑ Mountains(M) ❑ Piedmont(P) ❑ Inner Coastal Plain (1) ® Outer Coastal Plain (0)
16. Estimated geomorphic ®A ❑B
valley shape(skip for
Tidal Marsh Stream): (more sinuous stream,flatter valley slope) (less sinuous stream,steeper valley slope)
17.Watershed size: (skip ®Size 1 (<0.1 mil) ❑Size 2(0.1 to<0.5 mil) ❑Size 3(0.5 to<5 mil) ❑Size 4(>-5 mil)
for Tidal Marsh Stream)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION:
18.Were regulatory considerations evaluated? ®Yes ❑No If Yes, check all that apply to the assessment area.
❑Section 10 water ❑Classified Trout Waters ❑Water Supply Watershed (❑I ❑II ❑III [:]IV ❑V)
❑Essential Fish Habitat ❑Primary Nursery Area ❑ High Quality Waters/Outstanding Resource Waters
❑Publicly owned property ❑NCDWR Riparian buffer rule in effect ®Nutrient Sensitive Waters
❑Anadromous fish ❑303(d)List ❑CAMA Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)
❑Documented presence of a federal and/or state listed protected species within the assessment area.
List species:
❑Designated Critical Habitat(list species)
19.Are additional stream information/supplementary information/supplementary measurements included in"Notes/Sketch"section or attached? ❑Yes ®No
1. Channel Water-assessment reach metric(skip for Size 1 streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
®A Water throughout assessment reach.
❑B No flow,water in pools only.
❑C No water in assessment reach.
2. Evidence of Flow Restriction-assessment reach metric
❑A At least 10% of assessment reach in-stream habitat or riffle-pool sequence is severely affected by a flow restriction or fill to the
point of obstructing flow or a channel choked with aquatic macrophytes or ponded water or impoundment on flood or ebb within
the assessment reach(examples: undersized or perched culverts,causeways that constrict the channel,tidal gates,debris jams,
beaver dams).
®B Not A
3. Feature Pattern-assessment reach metric
®A A majority of the assessment reach has altered pattern (examples:straightening, modification above or below culvert).
❑B Not A
4. Feature Longitudinal Profile-assessment reach metric
®A Majority of assessment reach has a substantially altered stream profile(examples: channel down-cutting, existing damming, over
widening, active aggradation, dredging, and excavation where appropriate channel profile has not reformed from any of these
disturbances).
❑B Not A
5. Signs of Active Instability-assessment reach metric
Consider only current instability, not past events from which the stream has currently recovered. Examples of instability include
active bank failure, active channel down-cutting(head-cut),active widening,and artificial hardening(such as concrete,gabion, rip-rap).
®A < 10%of channel unstable
❑B 10 to 25%of channel unstable
❑C >25%of channel unstable

6. Streamside Area Interaction—streamside area metric
Consider for the Left Bank(LB)and the Right Bank(RB).
LB RB
®A ®A Little or no evidence of conditions that adversely affect reference interaction
❑B ❑B Moderate evidence of conditions (examples: berms, levees, down-cutting, aggradation, dredging)that adversely affect
reference interaction(examples: limited streamside area access,disruption of flood flows through streamside area,leaky
or intermittent bulkheads,causeways with floodplain constriction, minor ditching[including mosquito ditching])
❑C ❑C Extensive evidence of conditions that adversely affect reference interaction (little to no floodplain/intertidal zone access
[examples: causeways with floodplain and channel constriction,bulkheads,retaining walls,fill,stream incision,disruption
of flood flows through streamside area]or too much floodplain/intertidal zone access[examples:impoundments,intensive
mosquito ditching]) or floodplain/intertidal zone unnaturally absent or assessment reach is a man-made feature on an
interstream divide
7. Water Quality Stressors—assessment reach/intertidal zone metric
Check all that apply.
❑A Discolored water in stream or intertidal zone(milky white, blue, unnatural water discoloration, oil sheen, stream foam)
❑B Excessive sedimentation(burying of stream features or intertidal zone)
❑C Noticeable evidence of pollutant discharges entering the assessment reach and causing a water quality problem
❑D Odor(not including natural sulfide odors)
❑E Current published or collected data indicating degraded water quality in the assessment reach. Cite source in "Notes/Sketch"
section.
❑F Livestock with access to stream or intertidal zone
❑G Excessive algae in stream or intertidal zone
❑H Degraded marsh vegetation in the intertidal zone(removal, burning, regular mowing,destruction, etc)
❑I Other: (explain in"Notes/Sketch"section)
®J Little to no stressors
8. Recent Weather—watershed metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
For Size 1 or 2 streams, D1 drought or higher is considered a drought;for Size 3 or 4 streams, D2 drought or higher is considered a drought.
❑A Drought conditions and no rainfall or rainfall not exceeding 1 inch within the last 48 hours
❑B Drought conditions and rainfall exceeding 1 inch within the last 48 hours
®C No drought conditions
9. Large or Dangerous Stream—assessment reach metric
❑Yes ®No Is stream is too large or dangerous to assess? If Yes,skip to Metric 13(Streamside Area Ground Surface Condition).
10. Natural In-stream Habitat Types—assessment reach metric
10a. ®Yes ❑No Degraded in-stream habitat over majority of the assessment reach (examples of stressors include excessive
sedimentation, mining, excavation, in-stream hardening [for example, rip-rap], recent dredging, and snagging)
(evaluate for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams only,then skip to Metric 12)
10b. Check all that occur(occurs if>5%coverage of assessment reach)(skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams)
❑A Multiple aquatic macrophytes and aquatic mosses F, N ❑F 5%oysters or other natural hard bottoms
(include liverworts, lichens, and algal mats) m ❑G Submerged aquatic vegetation
®B Multiple sticks and/or leaf packs and/or emergent o w ❑H Low-tide refugia(pools)
vegetation YC ❑I Sand bottom
❑C Multiple snags and logs(including lap trees) r @ ❑J 5%vertical bank along the marsh
®D 5% undercut banks and/or root mats and/or roots ❑K Little or no habitat
in banks extend to the normal wetted perimeter
❑E Little or no habitat
*********************************REMAINING QUESTIONS ARE NOT APPLICABLE FOR TIDAL MARSH STREAMS****************************
11. Bedform and Substrate—assessment reach metric(skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
11a. ❑Yes ❑No Is assessment reach in a natural sand-bed stream?(skip for Coastal Plain streams)
11 b. Bedform evaluated. Check the appropriate box(es).
®A Riffle-run section(evaluate 11c)
❑B Pool-glide section(evaluate 11d)
❑C Natural bedform absent(skip to Metric 12,Aquatic Life)
11 c. In riffle sections,check all that occur below the normal wetted perimeter of the assessment reach—whether or not submerged. Check
at least one box in each row(skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams). Not Present(NP)=absent, Rare
(R)= present but < 10%, Common (C)_ > 10-40%,Abundant(A) _ >40-70%, Predominant(P)_ > 70%. Cumulative percentages
should not exceed 100%for each assessment reach.
NP R C A P
® ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Bedrock/saprolite
® ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Boulder(256—4096 mm)
® ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Cobble(64—256 mm)
® ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Gravel (2—64 mm)
❑ ❑ ❑ ® ❑ Sand (.062—2 mm)
❑ ❑ ® ❑ ❑ Silt/clay(<0.062 mm)
❑ ® ❑ ❑ ❑ Detritus
® ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Artificial (rip-rap, concrete,etc.)
11d. ❑Yes ❑No Are pools filled with sediment?(skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)

12. Aquatic Life—assessment reach metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
12a. ®Yes ❑No Was an in-stream aquatic life assessment performed as described in the User Manual?
If No,select one of the following reasons and skip to Metric 13. ❑No Water ❑Other:
12b. ®Yes ❑No Are aquatic organisms present in the assessment reach (look in riffles, pools, then snags)? If Yes, check all that
apply. If No, skip to Metric 13.
1 >1 Numbers over columns refer to"individuals"for Size 1 and 2 streams and"taxa"for Size 3 and 4 streams.
❑ ❑Adult frogs
❑ ❑Aquatic reptiles
❑ ❑Aquatic macrophytes and aquatic mosses(include liverworts, lichens, and algal mats)
❑ ❑Beetles
❑ ❑Caddisfly larvae(T)
❑ ®Asian clam (Corbicula)
❑ ®Crustacean(isopod/amphipod/crayfish/shrimp)
❑ ❑Damselfly and dragonfly larvae
❑ ❑Dipterans
❑ ❑Mayfly larvae(E)
❑ ❑Megaloptera(alderfly,fishfly, dobsonfly larvae)
❑ ❑Midges/mosquito larvae
❑ ❑Mosquito fish(Gambusia)or mud minnows(Umbra pygmaea)
❑ ❑Mussels/Clams(not Corbicula)
❑ ❑Other fish
❑ ❑Salamanders/tad poles
❑ ®Snails
❑ ❑Stonefly larvae(P)
❑ ❑Tipulid larvae
❑ ❑Worms/leeches
13. Streamside Area Ground Surface Condition—streamside area metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams and B valley types)
Consider for the Left Bank(LB)and the Right Bank(RB). Consider storage capacity with regard to both overbank flow and upland runoff.
LB RB
❑A ❑A Little or no alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area
®B ®B Moderate alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area
❑C ❑C Severe alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area(examples: ditches,fill,soil compaction,
livestock disturbance, buildings, man-made levees,drainage pipes)
14. Streamside Area Water Storage—streamside area metric(skip for Size 1 streams,Tidal Marsh Streams,and B valley types)
Consider for the Left Bank(LB)and the Right Bank(RB)of the streamside area.
LB RB
❑A ❑A Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water>6 inches deep
❑B ❑B Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water 3 to 6 inches deep
❑C ❑C Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water<3 inches deep
15. Wetland Presence—streamside area metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for the Left Bank(LB)and the Right Bank(RB). Do not consider wetlands outside of the streamside area or within the normal
wetted perimeter of assessment reach.
LB RB
❑Y ❑Y Are wetlands present in the streamside area?
®N ®N
16. Baseflow Contributors—assessment reach metric(skip for Size 4 streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all contributors within the assessment reach or within view of and draining to the assessment reach.
❑A Streams and/or springs(jurisdictional discharges)
❑B Ponds(include wet detention basins;do not include sediment basins or dry detention basins)
❑C Obstruction passing flow during low-flow periods within the assessment area(beaver dam, leaky dam, bottom-release dam,weir)
❑D Evidence of bank seepage or sweating(iron in water indicates seepage)
❑E Stream bed or bank soil reduced (dig through deposited sediment if present)
®F None of the above
17. Baseflow Detractors—assessment area metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all that apply.
❑A Evidence of substantial water withdrawals from the assessment reach(includes areas excavated for pump installation)
❑B Obstruction not passing flow during low-flow periods affecting the assessment reach (ex:watertight dam,sediment deposit)
®C Urban stream(>_24%impervious surface for watershed)
®D Evidence that the streamside area has been modified resulting in accelerated drainage into the assessment reach
❑E Assessment reach relocated to valley edge
❑F None of the above
18. Shading—assessment reach metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider aspect. Consider"leaf-on"condition.
❑A Stream shading is appropriate for stream category(may include gaps associated with natural processes)
®B Degraded (example: scattered trees)
❑C Stream shading is gone or largely absent

19. Buffer Width—streamside area metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider"vegetated buffer"and"wooded buffer"separately for left bank(LB)and right bank(RB)starting at the top of bank out
to the first break.
Vegetated Wooded
LB RB LB RB
❑A ®A ❑A ❑A >_ 100 feet wide or extends to the edge of the watershed
®B ❑B ❑B ❑B From 50 to< 100 feet wide
❑C ❑C ❑C ❑C From 30 to<50 feet wide
❑D ❑D ❑D ®D From 10 to<30 feet wide
❑E ❑E ®E ❑E < 10 feet wide or no trees
20. Buffer Structure—streamside area metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for left bank(LB)and right bank(RB)for Metric 19("Vegetated" Buffer Width).
LB RB
❑A ❑A Mature forest
❑B ❑B Non-mature woody vegetation or modified vegetation structure
®C ®C Herbaceous vegetation with or without a strip of trees< 10 feet wide
❑D ❑D Maintained shrubs
❑E ❑E Little or no vegetation
21. Buffer Stressors—streamside area metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all appropriate boxes for left bank(LB)and right bank(RB). Indicate if listed stressor abuts stream(Abuts),does not abut but is
within 30 feet of stream(<30 feet), or is between 30 to 50 feet of stream (30-50 feet).
If none of the following stressors occurs on either bank,check here and skip to Metric 22: ❑
Abuts <30 feet 30-50 feet
LB RB LB RB LB RB
❑A ❑A ❑A ❑A ❑A ❑A Row crops
❑B ❑B ®B ®B ❑B ❑B Maintained turf
❑C ❑C ❑C ❑C ❑C ❑C Pasture(no livestock)/commercial horticulture
❑D ❑D ❑D ❑D ❑D ❑D Pasture(active livestock use)
22. Stem Density—streamside area metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for left bank(LB)and right bank(RB)for Metric 19("Wooded" Buffer Width).
LB RB
®A ®A Medium to high stem density
❑B ❑B Low stem density
❑C ❑C No wooded riparian buffer or predominantly herbaceous species or bare ground
23. Continuity of Vegetated Buffer—streamside area metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider whether vegetated buffer is continuous along stream (parallel). Breaks are areas lacking vegetation> 10 feet wide.
LB RB
®A ®A The total length of buffer breaks is<25 percent.
❑B ❑B The total length of buffer breaks is between 25 and 50 percent.
❑C ❑C The total length of buffer breaks is>50 percent.
24. Vegetative Composition—streamside area metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Evaluate the dominant vegetation within 100 feet of each bank or to the edge of the watershed (whichever comes first)as it contributes to
assessment reach habitat.
LB RB
❑A ❑A Vegetation is close to undisturbed in species present and their proportions. Lower strata composed of native species,
with non-native invasive species absent or sparse.
❑B ❑B Vegetation indicates disturbance in terms of species diversity or proportions, but is still largely composed of native
species. This may include communities of weedy native species that develop after clear-cutting or clearing or
communities with non-native invasive species present, but not dominant, over a large portion of the expected strata or
communities missing understory but retaining canopy trees.
®C ®C Vegetation is severely disturbed in terms of species diversity or proportions. Mature canopy is absent or communities
with non-native invasive species dominant over a large portion of expected strata or communities composed of planted
stands of non-characteristic species or communities inappropriately composed of a single species or no vegetation.
25. Conductivity—assessment reach metric(skip for all Coastal Plain streams)
25a. ❑Yes ❑No Was conductivity measurement recorded?
If No,select one of the following reasons. []No Water ❑Other:
25b. Check the box corresponding to the conductivity measurement(units of microsiemens per centimeter).
❑A <46 FIB 46 to<67 ❑C 67 to<79 ❑D 79 to<230 FIE >:230
Notes/Sketch:

Draft NC SAM Stream Rating Sheet
Accompanies User Manual Version 2.1
Stream Site Name STIP U-6082 SR1308/1403 Date of Assessment 6/12/18
Improvements
Stream Category Oat Assessor Name/Organization S. Busbee
Notes of Field Assessment Form (Y/N) NO
Presence of regulatory considerations(Y/N) YES
Additional stream information/supplementary measurements included (Y/N) NO
NC SAM feature type(perennial, intermittent, Tidal Marsh Stream) Intermittent
USACE/ NCDWR
Function Class Rating Summary All Streams Intermittent
(1) Hydrology LOW LOW
(2)Baseflow LOW LOW
(2) Flood Flow MEDIUM MEDIUM
(3)Streamside Area Attenuation MEDIUM MEDIUM
(4) Floodplain Access HIGH HIGH
(4)Wooded Riparian Buffer LOW LOW
(4)Microtopography MEDIUM MEDIUM
(3)Stream Stability MEDIUM MEDIUM
(4)Channel Stability HIGH HIGH
(4)Sediment Transport NA NA
(4)Stream Geomorphology LOW LOW
(2)Stream/Intertidal Zone Interaction NA NA
(2)Longitudinal Tidal Flow NA NA
(2)Tidal Marsh Stream Stability NA NA
(3)Tidal Marsh Channel Stability NA NA
(3)Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology NA NA
(1)Water Quality LOW LOW
(2)Baseflow LOW LOW
(2)Streamside Area Vegetation MEDIUM MEDIUM
(3) Upland Pollutant Filtration MEDIUM MEDIUM
(3)Thermoregulation MEDIUM MEDIUM
(2) Indicators of Stressors NO NO
(2)Aquatic Life Tolerance LOW NA
(2) Intertidal Zone Filtration NA NA
(1) Habitat LOW LOW
(2) In-stream Habitat MEDIUM MEDIUM
(3)Baseflow LOW LOW
(3)Substrate HIGH HIGH
(3)Stream Stability MEDIUM MEDIUM
(3) In-stream Habitat MEDIUM HIGH
(2)Stream-side Habitat LOW LOW
(3)Stream-side Habitat LOW LOW
(3)Thermoregulation LOW LOW
(2)Tidal Marsh In-stream Habitat NA NA
(3)Flow Restriction NA NA
(3)Tidal Marsh Stream Stability NA NA
(4)Tidal Marsh Channel Stability NA NA
(4)Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology NA NA
(3)Tidal Marsh In-stream Habitat NA NA
(2) Intertidal Zone NA NA
Overall LOW LOW

NC SAM FIELD ASSESSMENT RESULTS
Accompanies User Manual Version 2.1
USACE AID#: NCDWR#:
INSTRUCTIONS: Attach a sketch of the assessment area and photographs. Attach a copy of the USGS 7.5-minute topographic quadrangle,
and circle the location of the stream reach under evaluation. If multiple stream reaches will be evaluated on the same property, identify and
number all reaches on the attached map,and include a separate form for each reach. See the NC SAM User Manual for detailed descriptions
and explanations of requested information. Record in the "Notes/Sketch"section if supplementary measurements were performed. See the
NC SAM User Manual for examples of additional measurements that may be relevant.
NOTE EVIDENCE OF STRESSORS AFFECTING THE ASSESSMENT AREA(do not need to be within the assessment area).
PROJECT/SITE INFORMATION:
STIP U-6082 SR1308/1403
1. Project name(if any): Improvements 2. Date of evaluation: 6/12/18
3.Applicant/owner name: NCDOT Division 3 4.Assessor name/organization: S. Busbee
5. County: Onslow 6. Nearest named water body
7. River basin: White Oak on USGS 7.5-minute quad: Sandy Run Branch
8. Site coordinates(decimal degrees, at lower end of assessment reach): 34.762392 N; -77.401459 W
STREAM INFORMATION: (depth and width can be approximations)
9. Site number(show on attached map): Stream B 10. Length of assessment reach evaluated(feet): 50
11. Channel depth from bed(in riffle, if present)to top of bank(feet): 4 ❑Unable to assess channel depth.
12. Channel width at top of bank(feet): 10 13. Is assessment reach a swamp steam? ❑Yes ®No
14. Feature type: ®Perennial flow ❑Intermittent flow ❑Tidal Marsh Stream
STREAM CATEGORY INFORMATION:
15. NC SAM Zone: ❑ Mountains(M) ❑ Piedmont(P) ❑ Inner Coastal Plain (1) ® Outer Coastal Plain (0)
16. Estimated geomorphic ®A ❑B
valley shape(skip for
Tidal Marsh Stream): (more sinuous stream,flatter valley slope) (less sinuous stream,steeper valley slope)
17.Watershed size: (skip ❑Size 1 (<0.1 mil) ❑Size 2(0.1 to<0.5 mil) ®Size 3(0.5 to<5 mil) ❑Size 4(>-5 mil)
for Tidal Marsh Stream)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION:
18.Were regulatory considerations evaluated? ®Yes ❑No If Yes, check all that apply to the assessment area.
❑Section 10 water ❑Classified Trout Waters ❑Water Supply Watershed (❑I ❑II ❑III [:]IV ❑V)
❑Essential Fish Habitat ❑Primary Nursery Area ❑ High Quality Waters/Outstanding Resource Waters
❑Publicly owned property ❑NCDWR Riparian buffer rule in effect ®Nutrient Sensitive Waters
❑Anadromous fish ❑303(d)List ❑CAMA Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)
❑Documented presence of a federal and/or state listed protected species within the assessment area.
List species:
❑Designated Critical Habitat(list species)
19.Are additional stream information/supplementary information/supplementary measurements included in"Notes/Sketch"section or attached? ❑Yes ®No
1. Channel Water-assessment reach metric(skip for Size 1 streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
®A Water throughout assessment reach.
❑B No flow,water in pools only.
❑C No water in assessment reach.
2. Evidence of Flow Restriction-assessment reach metric
❑A At least 10% of assessment reach in-stream habitat or riffle-pool sequence is severely affected by a flow restriction or fill to the
point of obstructing flow or a channel choked with aquatic macrophytes or ponded water or impoundment on flood or ebb within
the assessment reach(examples: undersized or perched culverts,causeways that constrict the channel,tidal gates,debris jams,
beaver dams).
®B Not A
3. Feature Pattern-assessment reach metric
®A A majority of the assessment reach has altered pattern (examples:straightening, modification above or below culvert).
❑B Not A
4. Feature Longitudinal Profile-assessment reach metric
®A Majority of assessment reach has a substantially altered stream profile(examples: channel down-cutting, existing damming, over
widening, active aggradation, dredging, and excavation where appropriate channel profile has not reformed from any of these
disturbances).
❑B Not A
5. Signs of Active Instability-assessment reach metric
Consider only current instability, not past events from which the stream has currently recovered. Examples of instability include
active bank failure, active channel down-cutting(head-cut),active widening,and artificial hardening(such as concrete,gabion, rip-rap).
®A < 10%of channel unstable
❑B 10 to 25%of channel unstable
❑C >25%of channel unstable

6. Streamside Area Interaction—streamside area metric
Consider for the Left Bank(LB)and the Right Bank(RB).
LB RB
❑A ❑A Little or no evidence of conditions that adversely affect reference interaction
®B ®B Moderate evidence of conditions (examples: berms, levees, down-cutting, aggradation, dredging)that adversely affect
reference interaction(examples: limited streamside area access,disruption of flood flows through streamside area,leaky
or intermittent bulkheads,causeways with floodplain constriction, minor ditching[including mosquito ditching])
❑C ❑C Extensive evidence of conditions that adversely affect reference interaction (little to no floodplain/intertidal zone access
[examples: causeways with floodplain and channel constriction,bulkheads,retaining walls,fill,stream incision,disruption
of flood flows through streamside area]or too much floodplain/intertidal zone access[examples:impoundments,intensive
mosquito ditching]) or floodplain/intertidal zone unnaturally absent or assessment reach is a man-made feature on an
interstream divide
7. Water Quality Stressors—assessment reach/intertidal zone metric
Check all that apply.
❑A Discolored water in stream or intertidal zone(milky white, blue, unnatural water discoloration, oil sheen, stream foam)
❑B Excessive sedimentation(burying of stream features or intertidal zone)
❑C Noticeable evidence of pollutant discharges entering the assessment reach and causing a water quality problem
❑D Odor(not including natural sulfide odors)
❑E Current published or collected data indicating degraded water quality in the assessment reach. Cite source in "Notes/Sketch"
section.
❑F Livestock with access to stream or intertidal zone
❑G Excessive algae in stream or intertidal zone
❑H Degraded marsh vegetation in the intertidal zone(removal, burning, regular mowing,destruction, etc)
❑I Other: (explain in"Notes/Sketch"section)
®J Little to no stressors
8. Recent Weather—watershed metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
For Size 1 or 2 streams, D1 drought or higher is considered a drought;for Size 3 or 4 streams, D2 drought or higher is considered a drought.
❑A Drought conditions and no rainfall or rainfall not exceeding 1 inch within the last 48 hours
❑B Drought conditions and rainfall exceeding 1 inch within the last 48 hours
®C No drought conditions
9. Large or Dangerous Stream—assessment reach metric
❑Yes ®No Is stream is too large or dangerous to assess? If Yes,skip to Metric 13(Streamside Area Ground Surface Condition).
10. Natural In-stream Habitat Types—assessment reach metric
10a. ®Yes ❑No Degraded in-stream habitat over majority of the assessment reach (examples of stressors include excessive
sedimentation, mining, excavation, in-stream hardening [for example, rip-rap], recent dredging, and snagging)
(evaluate for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams only,then skip to Metric 12)
10b. Check all that occur(occurs if>5%coverage of assessment reach)(skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams)
❑A Multiple aquatic macrophytes and aquatic mosses F, N ❑F 5%oysters or other natural hard bottoms
(include liverworts, lichens, and algal mats) m ❑G Submerged aquatic vegetation
®B Multiple sticks and/or leaf packs and/or emergent o w ❑H Low-tide refugia(pools)
vegetation YC ❑I Sand bottom
❑C Multiple snags and logs(including lap trees) r @ ❑J 5%vertical bank along the marsh
®D 5% undercut banks and/or root mats and/or roots ❑K Little or no habitat
in banks extend to the normal wetted perimeter
❑E Little or no habitat
*********************************REMAINING QUESTIONS ARE NOT APPLICABLE FOR TIDAL MARSH STREAMS****************************
11. Bedform and Substrate—assessment reach metric(skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
11a. ❑Yes ❑No Is assessment reach in a natural sand-bed stream?(skip for Coastal Plain streams)
11 b. Bedform evaluated. Check the appropriate box(es).
®A Riffle-run section(evaluate 11c)
❑B Pool-glide section(evaluate 11d)
❑C Natural bedform absent(skip to Metric 12,Aquatic Life)
11 c. In riffle sections,check all that occur below the normal wetted perimeter of the assessment reach—whether or not submerged. Check
at least one box in each row(skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams). Not Present(NP)=absent, Rare
(R)= present but < 10%, Common (C)_ > 10-40%,Abundant(A) _ >40-70%, Predominant(P)_ > 70%. Cumulative percentages
should not exceed 100%for each assessment reach.
NP R C A P
® ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Bedrock/saprolite
® ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Boulder(256—4096 mm)
® ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Cobble(64—256 mm)
❑ ❑ ® ❑ ❑ Gravel (2—64 mm)
❑ ❑ ❑ ® ❑ Sand (.062—2 mm)
❑ ❑ ® ❑ ❑ Silt/clay(<0.062 mm)
❑ ® ❑ ❑ ❑ Detritus
❑ ❑ ® ❑ ❑ Artificial (rip-rap, concrete,etc.)
11d. ❑Yes ❑No Are pools filled with sediment?(skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)

12. Aquatic Life—assessment reach metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
12a. ®Yes ❑No Was an in-stream aquatic life assessment performed as described in the User Manual?
If No,select one of the following reasons and skip to Metric 13. ❑No Water ❑Other:
12b. ®Yes ❑No Are aquatic organisms present in the assessment reach (look in riffles, pools, then snags)? If Yes, check all that
apply. If No, skip to Metric 13.
1 >1 Numbers over columns refer to"individuals"for Size 1 and 2 streams and"taxa"for Size 3 and 4 streams.
❑ ❑Adult frogs
❑ ❑Aquatic reptiles
❑ ❑Aquatic macrophytes and aquatic mosses(include liverworts, lichens, and algal mats)
❑ ❑Beetles
❑ ❑Caddisfly larvae(T)
® ❑Asian clam (Corbicula)
® ❑Crustacean(isopod/amphipod/crayfish/shrimp)
❑ ❑Damselfly and dragonfly larvae
❑ ❑Dipterans
❑ ❑Mayfly larvae(E)
❑ ❑Megaloptera(alderfly,fishfly, dobsonfly larvae)
❑ ❑Midges/mosquito larvae
® ❑Mosquito fish(Gambusia)or mud minnows(Umbra pygmaea)
❑ ❑Mussels/Clams(not Corbicula)
❑ ❑Other fish
❑ ❑Salamanders/tad poles
® ❑Snails
❑ ❑Stonefly larvae(P)
❑ ❑Tipulid larvae
❑ ❑Worms/leeches
13. Streamside Area Ground Surface Condition—streamside area metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams and B valley types)
Consider for the Left Bank(LB)and the Right Bank(RB). Consider storage capacity with regard to both overbank flow and upland runoff.
LB RB
❑A ❑A Little or no alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area
®B ®B Moderate alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area
❑C ❑C Severe alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area(examples: ditches,fill,soil compaction,
livestock disturbance, buildings, man-made levees,drainage pipes)
14. Streamside Area Water Storage—streamside area metric(skip for Size 1 streams,Tidal Marsh Streams,and B valley types)
Consider for the Left Bank(LB)and the Right Bank(RB)of the streamside area.
LB RB
❑A ❑A Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water>6 inches deep
❑B ❑B Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water 3 to 6 inches deep
®C ®C Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water<3 inches deep
15. Wetland Presence—streamside area metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for the Left Bank(LB)and the Right Bank(RB). Do not consider wetlands outside of the streamside area or within the normal
wetted perimeter of assessment reach.
LB RB
❑Y ❑Y Are wetlands present in the streamside area?
®N ®N
16. Baseflow Contributors—assessment reach metric(skip for Size 4 streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all contributors within the assessment reach or within view of and draining to the assessment reach.
®A Streams and/or springs(jurisdictional discharges)
❑B Ponds(include wet detention basins;do not include sediment basins or dry detention basins)
❑C Obstruction passing flow during low-flow periods within the assessment area(beaver dam, leaky dam, bottom-release dam,weir)
❑D Evidence of bank seepage or sweating(iron in water indicates seepage)
®E Stream bed or bank soil reduced (dig through deposited sediment if present)
❑F None of the above
17. Baseflow Detractors—assessment area metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all that apply.
❑A Evidence of substantial water withdrawals from the assessment reach(includes areas excavated for pump installation)
❑B Obstruction not passing flow during low-flow periods affecting the assessment reach (ex:watertight dam,sediment deposit)
®C Urban stream(>_24%impervious surface for watershed)
®D Evidence that the streamside area has been modified resulting in accelerated drainage into the assessment reach
❑E Assessment reach relocated to valley edge
❑F None of the above
18. Shading—assessment reach metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider aspect. Consider"leaf-on"condition.
❑A Stream shading is appropriate for stream category(may include gaps associated with natural processes)
®B Degraded (example: scattered trees)
❑C Stream shading is gone or largely absent

19. Buffer Width—streamside area metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider"vegetated buffer"and"wooded buffer"separately for left bank(LB)and right bank(RB)starting at the top of bank out
to the first break.
Vegetated Wooded
LB RB LB RB
❑A ❑A ❑A ❑A >_ 100 feet wide or extends to the edge of the watershed
®B ❑B ❑B ❑B From 50 to< 100 feet wide
❑C ❑C ❑C ❑C From 30 to<50 feet wide
❑D ❑D ®D ❑D From 10 to<30 feet wide
❑E ®E ❑E ®E < 10 feet wide or no trees
20. Buffer Structure—streamside area metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for left bank(LB)and right bank(RB)for Metric 19("Vegetated" Buffer Width).
LB RB
❑A ❑A Mature forest
®B ❑B Non-mature woody vegetation or modified vegetation structure
❑C ®C Herbaceous vegetation with or without a strip of trees< 10 feet wide
❑D ❑D Maintained shrubs
❑E ❑E Little or no vegetation
21. Buffer Stressors—streamside area metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all appropriate boxes for left bank(LB)and right bank(RB). Indicate if listed stressor abuts stream(Abuts),does not abut but is
within 30 feet of stream(<30 feet), or is between 30 to 50 feet of stream (30-50 feet).
If none of the following stressors occurs on either bank,check here and skip to Metric 22: ❑
Abuts <30 feet 30-50 feet
LB RB LB RB LB RB
❑A ❑A ❑A ❑A ❑A ❑A Row crops
❑B ❑B ®B ®B ❑B ❑B Maintained turf
❑C ❑C ❑C ❑C ❑C ❑C Pasture(no livestock)/commercial horticulture
❑D ❑D ❑D ❑D ❑D ❑D Pasture(active livestock use)
22. Stem Density—streamside area metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for left bank(LB)and right bank(RB)for Metric 19("Wooded" Buffer Width).
LB RB
®A ®A Medium to high stem density
❑B ❑B Low stem density
❑C ❑C No wooded riparian buffer or predominantly herbaceous species or bare ground
23. Continuity of Vegetated Buffer—streamside area metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider whether vegetated buffer is continuous along stream (parallel). Breaks are areas lacking vegetation> 10 feet wide.
LB RB
®A ®A The total length of buffer breaks is<25 percent.
❑B ❑B The total length of buffer breaks is between 25 and 50 percent.
❑C ❑C The total length of buffer breaks is>50 percent.
24. Vegetative Composition—streamside area metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Evaluate the dominant vegetation within 100 feet of each bank or to the edge of the watershed (whichever comes first)as it contributes to
assessment reach habitat.
LB RB
❑A ❑A Vegetation is close to undisturbed in species present and their proportions. Lower strata composed of native species,
with non-native invasive species absent or sparse.
❑B ❑B Vegetation indicates disturbance in terms of species diversity or proportions, but is still largely composed of native
species. This may include communities of weedy native species that develop after clear-cutting or clearing or
communities with non-native invasive species present, but not dominant, over a large portion of the expected strata or
communities missing understory but retaining canopy trees.
®C ®C Vegetation is severely disturbed in terms of species diversity or proportions. Mature canopy is absent or communities
with non-native invasive species dominant over a large portion of expected strata or communities composed of planted
stands of non-characteristic species or communities inappropriately composed of a single species or no vegetation.
25. Conductivity—assessment reach metric(skip for all Coastal Plain streams)
25a. ❑Yes ❑No Was conductivity measurement recorded?
If No,select one of the following reasons. []No Water ❑Other:
25b. Check the box corresponding to the conductivity measurement(units of microsiemens per centimeter).
❑A <46 FIB 46 to<67 ❑C 67 to<79 ❑D 79 to<230 FIE >:230
Notes/Sketch:

Draft NC SAM Stream Rating Sheet
Accompanies User Manual Version 2.1
Stream Site Name STIP U-6082 SR1308/1403 Date of Assessment 6/12/18
Improvements
Stream Category Oa3 Assessor Name/Organization S. Busbee
Notes of Field Assessment Form (Y/N) NO
Presence of regulatory considerations(Y/N) YES
Additional stream information/supplementary measurements included (Y/N) NO
NC SAM feature type(perennial, intermittent, Tidal Marsh Stream) Perennial
USACE/ NCDWR
Function Class Rating Summary All Streams Intermittent
(1) Hydrology LOW
(2)Baseflow HIGH
(2) Flood Flow LOW
(3)Streamside Area Attenuation LOW
(4) Floodplain Access MEDIUM
(4)Wooded Riparian Buffer LOW
(4)Microtopography LOW
(3)Stream Stability MEDIUM
(4)Channel Stability HIGH
(4)Sediment Transport NA
(4)Stream Geomorphology LOW
(2)Stream/Intertidal Zone Interaction NA
(2)Longitudinal Tidal Flow NA
(2)Tidal Marsh Stream Stability NA
(3)Tidal Marsh Channel Stability NA
(3)Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology NA
(1)Water Quality LOW
(2)Baseflow HIGH
(2)Streamside Area Vegetation LOW
(3) Upland Pollutant Filtration LOW
(3)Thermoregulation MEDIUM
(2) Indicators of Stressors NO
(2)Aquatic Life Tolerance LOW
(2) Intertidal Zone Filtration NA
(1) Habitat MEDIUM
(2) In-stream Habitat HIGH
(3)Baseflow HIGH
(3)Substrate HIGH
(3)Stream Stability MEDIUM
(3) In-stream Habitat MEDIUM
(2)Stream-side Habitat LOW
(3)Stream-side Habitat LOW
(3)Thermoregulation MEDIUM
(2)Tidal Marsh In-stream Habitat NA
(3)Flow Restriction NA
(3)Tidal Marsh Stream Stability NA
(4)Tidal Marsh Channel Stability NA
(4)Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology NA
(3)Tidal Marsh In-stream Habitat NA
(2) Intertidal Zone NA
Overall LOW

NC SAM FIELD ASSESSMENT RESULTS
Accompanies User Manual Version 2.1
USACE AID#: NCDWR#:
INSTRUCTIONS: Attach a sketch of the assessment area and photographs. Attach a copy of the USGS 7.5-minute topographic quadrangle,
and circle the location of the stream reach under evaluation. If multiple stream reaches will be evaluated on the same property, identify and
number all reaches on the attached map,and include a separate form for each reach. See the NC SAM User Manual for detailed descriptions
and explanations of requested information. Record in the "Notes/Sketch"section if supplementary measurements were performed. See the
NC SAM User Manual for examples of additional measurements that may be relevant.
NOTE EVIDENCE OF STRESSORS AFFECTING THE ASSESSMENT AREA(do not need to be within the assessment area).
PROJECT/SITE INFORMATION:
STIP U-6082 SR1308/1403
1. Project name(if any): Improvements 2. Date of evaluation: 6/13/18
3.Applicant/owner name: NCDOT Division 3 4.Assessor name/organization: S. Busbee
5. County: Onslow 6. Nearest named water body
7. River basin: White Oak on USGS 7.5-minute quad: Sandy Run Branch
8. Site coordinates(decimal degrees, at lower end of assessment reach): 34.763621 N; -77.399255 W
STREAM INFORMATION: (depth and width can be approximations)
9. Site number(show on attached map): Stream C 10. Length of assessment reach evaluated(feet): 100
11. Channel depth from bed(in riffle, if present)to top of bank(feet): 2 ❑Unable to assess channel depth.
12. Channel width at top of bank(feet): 4 13. Is assessment reach a swamp steam? ❑Yes ®No
14. Feature type: ❑Perennial flow ®Intermittent flow ❑Tidal Marsh Stream
STREAM CATEGORY INFORMATION:
15. NC SAM Zone: ❑ Mountains(M) ❑ Piedmont(P) ❑ Inner Coastal Plain (1) ® Outer Coastal Plain (0)
16. Estimated geomorphic ®A ❑B
valley shape(skip for
Tidal Marsh Stream): (more sinuous stream,flatter valley slope) (less sinuous stream,steeper valley slope)
17.Watershed size: (skip ❑Size 1 (<0.1 mil) ®Size 2(0.1 to<0.5 mil) ❑Size 3(0.5 to<5 mil) ❑Size 4(>-5 mil)
for Tidal Marsh Stream)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION:
18.Were regulatory considerations evaluated? ®Yes ❑No If Yes, check all that apply to the assessment area.
❑Section 10 water ❑Classified Trout Waters ❑Water Supply Watershed (❑I ❑II ❑III [:]IV ❑V)
❑Essential Fish Habitat ❑Primary Nursery Area ❑ High Quality Waters/Outstanding Resource Waters
❑Publicly owned property ❑NCDWR Riparian buffer rule in effect ®Nutrient Sensitive Waters
❑Anadromous fish ❑303(d)List ❑CAMA Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)
❑Documented presence of a federal and/or state listed protected species within the assessment area.
List species:
❑Designated Critical Habitat(list species)
19.Are additional stream information/supplementary information/supplementary measurements included in"Notes/Sketch"section or attached? ❑Yes ®No
1. Channel Water-assessment reach metric(skip for Size 1 streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
®A Water throughout assessment reach.
❑B No flow,water in pools only.
❑C No water in assessment reach.
2. Evidence of Flow Restriction-assessment reach metric
®A At least 10% of assessment reach in-stream habitat or riffle-pool sequence is severely affected by a flow restriction or fill to the
point of obstructing flow or a channel choked with aquatic macrophytes or ponded water or impoundment on flood or ebb within
the assessment reach(examples: undersized or perched culverts,causeways that constrict the channel,tidal gates,debris jams,
beaver dams).
❑B Not A
3. Feature Pattern-assessment reach metric
®A A majority of the assessment reach has altered pattern (examples:straightening, modification above or below culvert).
❑B Not A
4. Feature Longitudinal Profile-assessment reach metric
®A Majority of assessment reach has a substantially altered stream profile(examples: channel down-cutting, existing damming, over
widening, active aggradation, dredging, and excavation where appropriate channel profile has not reformed from any of these
disturbances).
❑B Not A
5. Signs of Active Instability-assessment reach metric
Consider only current instability, not past events from which the stream has currently recovered. Examples of instability include
active bank failure, active channel down-cutting(head-cut),active widening,and artificial hardening(such as concrete,gabion, rip-rap).
❑A < 10%of channel unstable
®B 10 to 25%of channel unstable
❑C >25%of channel unstable

6. Streamside Area Interaction—streamside area metric
Consider for the Left Bank(LB)and the Right Bank(RB).
LB RB
®A ®A Little or no evidence of conditions that adversely affect reference interaction
❑B ❑B Moderate evidence of conditions (examples: berms, levees, down-cutting, aggradation, dredging)that adversely affect
reference interaction(examples: limited streamside area access,disruption of flood flows through streamside area,leaky
or intermittent bulkheads,causeways with floodplain constriction, minor ditching[including mosquito ditching])
❑C ❑C Extensive evidence of conditions that adversely affect reference interaction (little to no floodplain/intertidal zone access
[examples: causeways with floodplain and channel constriction,bulkheads,retaining walls,fill,stream incision,disruption
of flood flows through streamside area]or too much floodplain/intertidal zone access[examples:impoundments,intensive
mosquito ditching]) or floodplain/intertidal zone unnaturally absent or assessment reach is a man-made feature on an
interstream divide
7. Water Quality Stressors—assessment reach/intertidal zone metric
Check all that apply.
❑A Discolored water in stream or intertidal zone(milky white, blue, unnatural water discoloration, oil sheen, stream foam)
❑B Excessive sedimentation(burying of stream features or intertidal zone)
❑C Noticeable evidence of pollutant discharges entering the assessment reach and causing a water quality problem
❑D Odor(not including natural sulfide odors)
❑E Current published or collected data indicating degraded water quality in the assessment reach. Cite source in "Notes/Sketch"
section.
❑F Livestock with access to stream or intertidal zone
❑G Excessive algae in stream or intertidal zone
❑H Degraded marsh vegetation in the intertidal zone(removal, burning, regular mowing,destruction, etc)
❑I Other: (explain in"Notes/Sketch"section)
®J Little to no stressors
8. Recent Weather—watershed metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
For Size 1 or 2 streams, D1 drought or higher is considered a drought;for Size 3 or 4 streams, D2 drought or higher is considered a drought.
❑A Drought conditions and no rainfall or rainfall not exceeding 1 inch within the last 48 hours
❑B Drought conditions and rainfall exceeding 1 inch within the last 48 hours
®C No drought conditions
9. Large or Dangerous Stream—assessment reach metric
❑Yes ®No Is stream is too large or dangerous to assess? If Yes,skip to Metric 13(Streamside Area Ground Surface Condition).
10. Natural In-stream Habitat Types—assessment reach metric
10a. ®Yes ❑No Degraded in-stream habitat over majority of the assessment reach (examples of stressors include excessive
sedimentation, mining, excavation, in-stream hardening [for example, rip-rap], recent dredging, and snagging)
(evaluate for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams only,then skip to Metric 12)
10b. Check all that occur(occurs if>5%coverage of assessment reach)(skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams)
❑A Multiple aquatic macrophytes and aquatic mosses F, N ❑F 5%oysters or other natural hard bottoms
(include liverworts, lichens, and algal mats) m ❑G Submerged aquatic vegetation
®B Multiple sticks and/or leaf packs and/or emergent o w ❑H Low-tide refugia(pools)
vegetation YC ❑I Sand bottom
❑C Multiple snags and logs(including lap trees) r @ ❑J 5%vertical bank along the marsh
®D 5% undercut banks and/or root mats and/or roots ❑K Little or no habitat
in banks extend to the normal wetted perimeter
❑E Little or no habitat
*********************************REMAINING QUESTIONS ARE NOT APPLICABLE FOR TIDAL MARSH STREAMS****************************
11. Bedform and Substrate—assessment reach metric(skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
11a. ❑Yes ❑No Is assessment reach in a natural sand-bed stream?(skip for Coastal Plain streams)
11 b. Bedform evaluated. Check the appropriate box(es).
®A Riffle-run section(evaluate 11c)
❑B Pool-glide section(evaluate 11d)
❑C Natural bedform absent(skip to Metric 12,Aquatic Life)
11 c. In riffle sections,check all that occur below the normal wetted perimeter of the assessment reach—whether or not submerged. Check
at least one box in each row(skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams). Not Present(NP)=absent, Rare
(R)= present but < 10%, Common (C)_ > 10-40%,Abundant(A) _ >40-70%, Predominant(P)_ > 70%. Cumulative percentages
should not exceed 100%for each assessment reach.
NP R C A P
® ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Bedrock/saprolite
® ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Boulder(256—4096 mm)
® ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Cobble(64—256 mm)
® ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Gravel (2—64 mm)
❑ ❑ ❑ ® ❑ Sand (.062—2 mm)
❑ ❑ ® ❑ ❑ Silt/clay(<0.062 mm)
❑ ® ❑ ❑ ❑ Detritus
® ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Artificial (rip-rap, concrete,etc.)
11d. ❑Yes ❑No Are pools filled with sediment?(skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)

12. Aquatic Life—assessment reach metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
12a. ®Yes ❑No Was an in-stream aquatic life assessment performed as described in the User Manual?
If No,select one of the following reasons and skip to Metric 13. ❑No Water ❑Other:
12b. ®Yes ❑No Are aquatic organisms present in the assessment reach (look in riffles, pools, then snags)? If Yes, check all that
apply. If No, skip to Metric 13.
1 >1 Numbers over columns refer to"individuals"for Size 1 and 2 streams and"taxa"for Size 3 and 4 streams.
❑ ❑Adult frogs
❑ ❑Aquatic reptiles
❑ ❑Aquatic macrophytes and aquatic mosses(include liverworts, lichens, and algal mats)
❑ ❑Beetles
❑ ❑Caddisfly larvae(T)
® ❑Asian clam (Corbicula)
❑ ❑Crustacean(isopod/amphipod/crayfish/shrimp)
❑ ❑Damselfly and dragonfly larvae
❑ ❑Dipterans
❑ ❑Mayfly larvae(E)
❑ ❑Megaloptera(alderfly,fishfly, dobsonfly larvae)
❑ ❑Midges/mosquito larvae
® ❑Mosquito fish(Gambusia)or mud minnows(Umbra pygmaea)
❑ ❑Mussels/Clams(not Corbicula)
® ❑Other fish
❑ ❑Salamanders/tad poles
❑ ❑Snails
❑ ❑Stonefly larvae(P)
❑ ❑Tipulid larvae
❑ ❑Worms/leeches
13. Streamside Area Ground Surface Condition—streamside area metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams and B valley types)
Consider for the Left Bank(LB)and the Right Bank(RB). Consider storage capacity with regard to both overbank flow and upland runoff.
LB RB
❑A ❑A Little or no alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area
®B ®B Moderate alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area
❑C ❑C Severe alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area(examples: ditches,fill,soil compaction,
livestock disturbance, buildings, man-made levees,drainage pipes)
14. Streamside Area Water Storage—streamside area metric(skip for Size 1 streams,Tidal Marsh Streams,and B valley types)
Consider for the Left Bank(LB)and the Right Bank(RB)of the streamside area.
LB RB
❑A ❑A Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water>6 inches deep
❑B ❑B Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water 3 to 6 inches deep
®C ®C Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water<3 inches deep
15. Wetland Presence—streamside area metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for the Left Bank(LB)and the Right Bank(RB). Do not consider wetlands outside of the streamside area or within the normal
wetted perimeter of assessment reach.
LB RB
❑Y ❑Y Are wetlands present in the streamside area?
®N ®N
16. Baseflow Contributors—assessment reach metric(skip for Size 4 streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all contributors within the assessment reach or within view of and draining to the assessment reach.
❑A Streams and/or springs(jurisdictional discharges)
❑B Ponds(include wet detention basins;do not include sediment basins or dry detention basins)
❑C Obstruction passing flow during low-flow periods within the assessment area(beaver dam, leaky dam, bottom-release dam,weir)
❑D Evidence of bank seepage or sweating(iron in water indicates seepage)
®E Stream bed or bank soil reduced (dig through deposited sediment if present)
❑F None of the above
17. Baseflow Detractors—assessment area metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all that apply.
❑A Evidence of substantial water withdrawals from the assessment reach(includes areas excavated for pump installation)
®B Obstruction not passing flow during low-flow periods affecting the assessment reach (ex:watertight dam,sediment deposit)
❑C Urban stream(>_24%impervious surface for watershed)
®D Evidence that the streamside area has been modified resulting in accelerated drainage into the assessment reach
❑E Assessment reach relocated to valley edge
❑F None of the above
18. Shading—assessment reach metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider aspect. Consider"leaf-on"condition.
❑A Stream shading is appropriate for stream category(may include gaps associated with natural processes)
❑B Degraded (example: scattered trees)
®C Stream shading is gone or largely absent

19. Buffer Width—streamside area metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider"vegetated buffer"and"wooded buffer"separately for left bank(LB)and right bank(RB)starting at the top of bank out
to the first break.
Vegetated Wooded
LB RB LB RB
❑A ❑A ❑A ❑A >_ 100 feet wide or extends to the edge of the watershed
❑B ❑B ❑B ❑B From 50 to< 100 feet wide
❑C ❑C ❑C ❑C From 30 to<50 feet wide
❑D ®D ❑D ❑D From 10 to<30 feet wide
®E ❑E ®E ®E < 10 feet wide or no trees
20. Buffer Structure—streamside area metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for left bank(LB)and right bank(RB)for Metric 19("Vegetated" Buffer Width).
LB RB
❑A ❑A Mature forest
❑B ❑B Non-mature woody vegetation or modified vegetation structure
®C ®C Herbaceous vegetation with or without a strip of trees< 10 feet wide
❑D ❑D Maintained shrubs
❑E ❑E Little or no vegetation
21. Buffer Stressors—streamside area metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all appropriate boxes for left bank(LB)and right bank(RB). Indicate if listed stressor abuts stream(Abuts),does not abut but is
within 30 feet of stream(<30 feet), or is between 30 to 50 feet of stream (30-50 feet).
If none of the following stressors occurs on either bank,check here and skip to Metric 22: ❑
Abuts <30 feet 30-50 feet
LB RB LB RB LB RB
❑A ❑A ❑A ❑A ❑A ❑A Row crops
®B ®B ❑B ❑B ❑B ❑B Maintained turf
❑C ❑C ❑C ❑C ❑C ❑C Pasture(no livestock)/commercial horticulture
❑D ❑D ❑D ❑D ❑D ❑D Pasture(active livestock use)
22. Stem Density—streamside area metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for left bank(LB)and right bank(RB)for Metric 19("Wooded" Buffer Width).
LB RB
❑A ❑A Medium to high stem density
❑B ❑B Low stem density
®C ®C No wooded riparian buffer or predominantly herbaceous species or bare ground
23. Continuity of Vegetated Buffer—streamside area metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider whether vegetated buffer is continuous along stream (parallel). Breaks are areas lacking vegetation> 10 feet wide.
LB RB
❑A ❑A The total length of buffer breaks is<25 percent.
❑B ❑B The total length of buffer breaks is between 25 and 50 percent.
®C ®C The total length of buffer breaks is>50 percent.
24. Vegetative Composition—streamside area metric(skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Evaluate the dominant vegetation within 100 feet of each bank or to the edge of the watershed (whichever comes first)as it contributes to
assessment reach habitat.
LB RB
❑A ❑A Vegetation is close to undisturbed in species present and their proportions. Lower strata composed of native species,
with non-native invasive species absent or sparse.
❑B ❑B Vegetation indicates disturbance in terms of species diversity or proportions, but is still largely composed of native
species. This may include communities of weedy native species that develop after clear-cutting or clearing or
communities with non-native invasive species present, but not dominant, over a large portion of the expected strata or
communities missing understory but retaining canopy trees.
®C ®C Vegetation is severely disturbed in terms of species diversity or proportions. Mature canopy is absent or communities
with non-native invasive species dominant over a large portion of expected strata or communities composed of planted
stands of non-characteristic species or communities inappropriately composed of a single species or no vegetation.
25. Conductivity—assessment reach metric(skip for all Coastal Plain streams)
25a. ❑Yes ❑No Was conductivity measurement recorded?
If No,select one of the following reasons. []No Water ❑Other:
25b. Check the box corresponding to the conductivity measurement(units of microsiemens per centimeter).
❑A <46 FIB 46 to<67 ❑C 67 to<79 ❑D 79 to<230 FIE >:230
Notes/Sketch:

Draft NC SAM Stream Rating Sheet
Accompanies User Manual Version 2.1
Stream Site Name STIP U-6082 SR1308/1403 Date of Assessment 6/13/18
Improvements
Stream Category Oa2 Assessor Name/Organization S. Busbee
Notes of Field Assessment Form (Y/N) NO
Presence of regulatory considerations(Y/N) YES
Additional stream information/supplementary measurements included (Y/N) NO
NC SAM feature type(perennial, intermittent, Tidal Marsh Stream) Intermittent
USACE/ NCDWR
Function Class Rating Summary All Streams Intermittent
(1) Hydrology LOW LOW
(2)Baseflow HIGH MEDIUM
(2) Flood Flow LOW LOW
(3)Streamside Area Attenuation MEDIUM MEDIUM
(4) Floodplain Access HIGH HIGH
(4)Wooded Riparian Buffer LOW LOW
(4)Microtopography LOW LOW
(3)Stream Stability LOW LOW
(4)Channel Stability MEDIUM MEDIUM
(4)Sediment Transport NA NA
(4)Stream Geomorphology LOW LOW
(2)Stream/Intertidal Zone Interaction NA NA
(2)Longitudinal Tidal Flow NA NA
(2)Tidal Marsh Stream Stability NA NA
(3)Tidal Marsh Channel Stability NA NA
(3)Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology NA NA
(1)Water Quality LOW LOW
(2)Baseflow HIGH MEDIUM
(2)Streamside Area Vegetation LOW LOW
(3) Upland Pollutant Filtration LOW LOW
(3)Thermoregulation LOW LOW
(2) Indicators of Stressors NO NO
(2)Aquatic Life Tolerance LOW NA
(2) Intertidal Zone Filtration NA NA
(1) Habitat MEDIUM MEDIUM
(2) In-stream Habitat HIGH HIGH
(3)Baseflow HIGH MEDIUM
(3)Substrate HIGH HIGH
(3)Stream Stability MEDIUM MEDIUM
(3) In-stream Habitat MEDIUM MEDIUM
(2)Stream-side Habitat LOW LOW
(3)Stream-side Habitat LOW LOW
(3)Thermoregulation LOW LOW
(2)Tidal Marsh In-stream Habitat NA NA
(3)Flow Restriction NA NA
(3)Tidal Marsh Stream Stability NA NA
(4)Tidal Marsh Channel Stability NA NA
(4)Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology NA NA
(3)Tidal Marsh In-stream Habitat NA NA
(2) Intertidal Zone NA NA
Overall LOW LOW

NCDOT Division 3 STIP U-6082 July 2019
SR 1308 and SR 1403 Intersection Improvements in Onslow County, NC—Request for JD
Attachment D
USACE Wetland Determination Data Forms

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM—Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site: STIP U-6082;SR 1308 and SR 1403 Intersection Improvements City/County: Jacksonville/Onslow Sampling Date: 06-12-18
Applicant/Owner: NCDOT Division 3 State: NC Sampling Point: DP1
Investigator(s): Steven Busbee,PWS Section,Township,Range:
Landform(hillslope,terrace,etc.): terrace Local relief(concave,convex, none): flat to gentle slope Slope(%): 0-1%
Subregion(LRR or MLRA): LRR-T Lat: 34.758931 Long: -77.403441 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: Goldsboro-Urban land complex,0 to 5 percent slopes(GpB) NWI classification: None
Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no,explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are"Normal Circumstances"present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed,explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS- Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes x No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes x No X
within a Wetland? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No x
Remarks:
DP1 was taken in mixed hardwood-pine forest approximately 175 feet east-southeast of the
intersection of Hargett Street (SR 1403) and Enouch Lane; see Att B - Figures 4 and 4B for maps
depicting the location of DP1. DP1 is representative of a non-jurisdictional upland area.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators(minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators(minimum of one is required;check all that apply) ❑ Surface Soil Cracks(136)
❑ Surface Water(Al) 1❑-f Aquatic Fauna(1313) ❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(138)
❑ High Water Table(A2) LJ Marl Deposits(1315)(LRR U) ❑ Drainage Patterns(1310)
❑ Saturation(A3) TII Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(Cl) ❑ Moss Trim Lines(B16)
❑ Water Marks(131) I 1 Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots(C3) ❑ Dry-Season Water Table(C2)
❑ Sediment Deposits(B2) ❑ Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) ❑ Crayfish Burrows(C8)
❑ Drift Deposits(B3) ❑_ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils(C6) ❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery(C9)
Q Algal Mat or Crust(B4) ❑ Thin Muck Surface(C7) ❑ Geomorphic Position(D2)
a Iron Deposits(135) ❑ Other(Explain in Remarks) ❑ Shallow Aquitard(D3)
El Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(137) II FAC-Neutral Test(D5)
a Water-Stained Leaves(69) II Sphagnum moss(D8)(LRR T,U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No X Depth(inches): N/A
Water Table Present? Yes No X Depth(inches): N/A
Saturation Present? Yes No X Depth(inches): '12 Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data(stream gauge, monitoring well,aerial photos,previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
No wetland hydrology indicators are present.
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region-Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata)— Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: DP1
Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30'"30' ) %Cover Species? Status Number of Dominant Species
1 Liquidambar styraciflua 45 yes FAC That Are OBL, FACW,or FAC: 7 (A)
2 Pinus taeda 40 yes FAC
Quercus hemisphaerica 40 yes FACU Total Number of Dominant 9
3• Species Across All Strata: (B)
4 Acer rubrum 25 no FAC
Percent of Dominant Species
5. That Are OBL, FACW,or FAC: 78 (A/B)
6.
7 Prevalence Index worksheet:
8 Total%Cover of: Multiply by:
150 =Total Cover OBL species x 1 =
50%of total cover: 75 20%of total cover: 30 FACW species x 2=
Saplinq/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 30'X 30' ) FAC species x 3=
1 Elaeagnus angustifolia 30 yes FACU FACU species x 4=
2 Ligustrum japonicum 20 yes FAC UPL species x 5=
3. Ligustrum sinense 20 yes FAC Column Totals: (A) (B)
4 Liquidambar styraciflua 10 no FAC
Prevalence Index =B/A=
5. Acer rubrum 10 no FAC
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
6. _ 1 -Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
7. X 2-Dominance Test is>50%
8• _ 3-Prevalence Index is 53.0'
90 =Total Cover
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation (Explain)
50%of total cover: 45 20%of total cover: 18
Herb Stratum Plot size: 30'X 30'
( ) Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
1 Ligustrum sinense 15 yes FAC be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
2. Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3• Tree—Woody plants,excluding vines,3 in.(7.6 cm)or
4. more in diameter at breast height(DBH),regardless of
5 height.
6• Sapling/Shrub—Woody plants,excluding vines, less
7, than 3 in.DBH and greater than 3.28 ft(1 m)tall.
8. Herb—All herbaceous(non-woody)plants,regardless
g• of size,and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
10. Woody vine—All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
11. height.
12.
15 =Total Cover
50%of total cover: 7.5 20%of total cover: 3
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30'X 30' )
1 Toxicodendron radicans 20 yes FAC
2 Smilax bonanox 10 yes FAC
3.
4.
5• Hydrophytic
30 =Total Cover Vegetation
50%of total cover: 15 20%of total cover: 6 Present? Yes x No
Remarks: (If observed,list morphological adaptations below).
A dominance of hydrophytic vegetation is present
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region—Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: DP1
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color(moist) % Color(moist) % Type' Loc2 Texture Remarks
0-5 10YR 2/1 100 fine sandy
loam
5-7 10YR 2/1 50 loam
10YR 6/1 50 loam
7-14+ 10YR 6/2 60 10YR 5/8 10 C M clay loam
10YR 2/1 30 clay loam
'Type: C=Concentration,D=Depletion,RM=Reduced Matrix,MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs,unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
Histosol(Al) ❑ Polyvalue Below Surface(S8)(LRR S,T, U) ❑ 1 cm Muck(A9)(LRR O)
Histic Epipedon(A2) ❑ Thin Dark Surface(S9)(LRR S,T,U) TU 2 cm Muck(A10)(LRR S)
❑ Black Histic(A3) ❑ Loamy Mucky Mineral(F1)(LRR O) � 1 Reduced Vertic(F18)(outside MLRA 150A,B)
Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) ❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) _E1 Piedmont Floodplain Soils(F19)(LRR P,S,T)
Stratified Layers(A5) Q✓ Depleted Matrix(F3) u Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils(F20)
❑ Organic Bodies(A6)(LRR P,T,U) ❑ Redox Dark Surface(F6) (MLRA 1536)
❑ 5 cm Mucky Mineral(A7)(LRR P,T,U) Depleted Dark Surface(F7) ❑ Red Parent Material(TF2)
❑ Muck Presence(A8)(LRR U) Redox Depressions(F8) uI Very Shallow Dark Surface(TF12)
❑ 1 cm Muck(A9)(LRR P,T) ❑ Marl(F10)(LRR U) 0 Other(Explain in Remarks)
❑ Depleted Below Dark Surface(Al 1) ❑ Depleted Ochric(F11)(MLRA 151)
❑ Thick Dark Surface(Al2) ❑ Iron-Manganese Masses(F12)(LRR O,P,T) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
❑ Coast Prairie Redox(A16)(MLRA 150A) ❑ Umbric Surface(F13)(LRR P,T, U) wetland hydrology must be present,
❑ Sandy Mucky Mineral(S1)(LRR O,S) ❑ Delta Ochric(F17)(MLRA 151) unless disturbed or problematic.
❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) ❑ Reduced Vertic(F18)(MLRA 150A,150B)
❑ Sandy Redox(S5) ❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils(F19)(MLRA 149A)
Stripped Matrix(S6) Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils(F20)(MLRA 149A, 153C,153D)
Dark Surface(S7)(LRR P,S,T,U)
Restrictive Layer(if observed):
Type:
Depth(inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
The Depleted Matrix (F3) hydric soil indicator is present.
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region—Version 2.0

NCDOT Division 3 STIP U-6082 July 2019
SR 1308 and SR 1403 Intersection Improvements in Onslow County, NC—Request for JD
Attachment E
Representative Photographs

NCDOT Division 3 STIP U-6082 July 2019
SR 1308 and SR 1403 Intersection Improvements in Onslow County, NC—Request for JD
RN
1.
i-
�`
I.
-cat{' �- —
•M
i
Photograph 1 —View of Stream A looking upstream at its origination at the Hargett Street pipe outfall.
i+u ..3 -e:f: /S. v eAyl?.1
-h� AR a f� ���iii777
i
d r t1 N.
`O I Vic.
ti. 11p"
Photograph 2—View of Stream A looking downstream from its origination.

NCDOT Division 3 STIP U-6082 July 2019
SR 1308 and SR 1403 Intersection Improvements in Onslow County, NC—Request for JD
p
r
4 y
r
�. a
Photograph 3 —View of Stream B (Sandy Run Branch) looking upstream at the Bell Fork Road culvert.
�xa
tI 3��J4 r
Photograph 4y—View of Stream B (Sandy Run Branch) looking downstream from the Bell Fork Road
culvert.

NCDOT Division 3 STIP U-6082 July 2019
SR 1308 and SR 1403 Intersection Improvements in Onslow County, NC—Request for JD
s
_ l
Photograph 5—View of a downstream section of Stream A(Sandy Run Branch) looking upstream.
>y
y
It
14
W010
-
$
��� t"'!� �w4'o-�• of '`ms" '- r 1 �! s
� 4
4r�
r•r R
♦_ t �'ti
Photograph 6—View of the non jurisdictional ephemeral section of Stream C looking upstream at its
origination.

NCDOT Division 3 STIP U-6082 July 2019
SR 1308 and SR 1403 Intersection Improvements in Onslow County, NC—Request for JD
P .
s
4.
pi
7 F7#5 ,��:.d V�, .�.4ti1 `A
pik
�y
t 1_..il
e
Photograph 7—View of the non jurisdictional ephemeral section of Stream C looking downstream at its
crossing with Country Club Road.
1
F
Photograph 8—View of jurisdictional intermittent reach of Stream C looking downstream from its
crossing with Country Club Road.

NCDOT Division 3 STIP U-6082 July 2019
SR 1308 and SR 1403 Intersection Improvements in Onslow County, NC—Request for JD
77
I1
r
Ali
r � o
a
Photograph 9—View of a downstream section of the jurisdictional intermittent reach of Stream C looking
upstream at a piped crossing.
r
4
�M.
w
lrr s
'0IN
'
FS
FV
� 4
Photograph 10—View of a downstream section of Stream C looking downstream from the piped crossing
shown in Photograph 9.

NCDOT Division 3 STIP U-6082 July 2019
SR 1308 and SR 1403 Intersection Improvements in Onslow County, NC—Request for JD
Attachment F
Aquatic Resources Summary Table/ORM Upload Sheet

�Jjjjjjnkwardin Code I HGM_Code I Meas_Type a t it Local Waterway
Stream A NORTH CAROLINA R4 Linear 193 FOOT DELINEATE 34.75995100 -77.40292600
Stream B(Sandy Run Branch) NORTH CAROLINA R3 Linear 165 FOOT DELINEATE 34.76239200 -77.40145900
Stream C NORTH CAROLINA R4 Linear 145 FOOT DELINEATE 34.76362100 -77.39925500