20201865 Ver 1_Technical Propsal (Option 1)_2020_20201231

giV6,11111111
W ILDLANDS
ENGINEERING
March 26, 2020
Ms. Brooke Wells
NC DEQ-Division of Mitigation Services
217 West Jones Street,Suite 3409-I
Raleigh, NC 27603
RE: Wildlands Engineering, Inc. Proposal—Cornbread Valley Mitigation Site
Little Tennessee River Basin Cataloging Unit 06010202; Macon County, NC
In response to RFP 16-20190304- Full Delivery Project
Dear Ms. Wells,
As an authorized representative of Wildlands Engineering, Inc. (Wildlands), I am pleased to present to
the NC Division of Mitigation Services(DMS)the following proposal to provide stream credits in the
Little Tennessee River Basin (Cataloging Unit 06010202) in response to RFP 16-20190304.This proposal
is a firm offer from Wildlands and remains open for acceptance by the NC Department of Environmental
Quality(DEQ) until September 22, 2020,which is 180 days from the closing date of the above-
referenced RFP.
As a fully licensed engineering firm, Wildlands will serve as the contracting entity and lead designer.The
key individuals on the Wildlands Team have worked together on numerous projects over multiple years
and will operate smoothly as a cohesive unit.
Wildlands is committed to creating an excellent ecological restoration project at the Cornbread Valley
Mitigation Site and is proposing two options using a combination of cold stream restoration and
enhancement. Option 1 will develop 4,520 cold stream credits. Option 2 will develop 3,634 cold stream
credits.
The Site is an active cattle farm and includes Jones Creek and its tributaries. Cattle currently have access
to all Site streams. Site streams are typically either severely eroded or aggradational, having cattle and
sediment impacted streambeds.An old farm pond and perched culverts impact aquatic organism
passage and habitat connectivity.This project will improve water quality and ecology uplift in this
watershed through cattle exclusion, buffer reforestation, reconnecting streams to the historic
floodplain, restoring stream dimension and function,and reconnecting fragmented habitats.
Wildlands' Cornbread Valley Mitigation Site submittal includes one signed,original Technical Proposal;
four photocopies of the Technical Proposal;one USB flash drive containing one electronic copy of the
Technical Proposal and the Project Site boundaries in ArcOlS format; one signed,original Cost Proposal;
and one photocopy of the Cost Proposal. All paper contained within this proposal is 100%ti recycled, 30%
post-consumer content.
With our diverse,yet unified team we offer the expertise, understanding,and commitment to ensure
this project's success.
Si cerely,
Shawn Wilkerson, President
wWildlands Engineering,Inc.1P]704.332,7754 • (F)704,332.3306 • 1430 South Mint St,Suite 104 • Charlotte,NC 28203

t‘c 42, loppr AL.-. _ -, ----7 -..-- ,
N.if -err:•
COPY :::
•mom )' .:r , ,'�. {':�.
_?,-.. rr
•
.rY•• ;fin`,,•=' •r i _ , _ —qv=- LI . . -. :y. i
.-- r.a.y Cti - -- eti....
ll `
�k7 ,, k=, i: y a ' :Vr � a ',i� � '
. • {y - '
1 t
Y -�., �: './ ead Tr"� • i j, %
, 44, i
:..z is '.,
• 14.
• - = _ dry:;, �, 7r.. , -\�- :r-. ;9 '6. ''.•
t , ti
CORNBREAD VALLEY MITIGATION SITE
LITTLE TENNESSEE RIVER BASIN 06010202
RFP #16-20190304
TECHNICAL PROPOSAL
PROPOSAL OPENING DATE: MARCH 26, 2020 at 2:00 PM
1‘10111 11411V
WILDLANDS
FNGINEERING
Wildlands Engineering, Inc.
1430 S. Mint Street, Suite 104, Charlotte, NC 28203
PHONE: [phone], FAX:[phone]
Wildlands' Authorized Representative: Shawn Wilkerson
t� This report is printed on recycled paper SUBMITTED TO: it
1

-_4 ••t��,,,,,,
oF. STATE 0,A:% 1
.��\ �pY 20. /77s 0 I,
4
„.. ,...,
+t1IhNNk QuAM VI to-/`.
l'k11 _
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
Request for Proposal #
'16-20190304
For internal State agency processing, including tabulation of proposals in the Interactive Purchasing
System (IPS), please provide your company's Federal Employer Identification Number or alternate
identification number(e.g. Social Security Number). Pursuant to G.S. 132-1.10(b)this identification number
shall not be released to the public. This page will be removed and shredded, or otherwise kept
confidential, before the procurement file is made available for public inspection.
This page is to be filled out and returned with your proposal.
Failure to do so may subject your proposal to rejection.
ID Number:
56-0651376
Federal ID Number or Social Security Number
Midlands Engineering, Inc.
Vendor Name
Sealed, mailed or hand delivered responses ONLY will be accepted for this
solicitation.
Ver:4/2209

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
Department of Environmental Quality
Refer ALL Inquiries regarding this RFP to:
Request for Proposal #: 16-20190304
Brooke Wells
Brooke.weil s@ ncdenr.oav
Proposals will be publicly opened: March 26, 2020
[phone]
Contract Type: Open Market
Using Agency: Division of Mitigation Services
Commodity No. and Description: 962-73
Restoration / Reclamation Services of Land and
other Properties
Requisition No.: N/A
In compliance with this Request for Proposals (RFP), and subject to all the conditions herein, the undersigned Vendor offers and
agrees to furnish and deliver any or all items upon which prices are bid, at the prices set opposite each item within the time
specified herein. By executing this proposal, the undersigned Vendor certifies that this proposal is submitted competitively and
without collusion (G.S. 143-54), that none of its officers, directors, or owners of an unincorporated business entity has been
convicted of any violations of Chapter 78A of the General Statutes, the Securities Act of 1933, or the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 (G.S. 143-59.2), and that it is not an ineligible Vendor as set forth in G.S. 143-59.1. False certification is a Class I felony.
Furthermore, by executing this proposal, the undersigned certifies to the best of Vendor's knowledge and belief, that it and its
principals are not presently debarred, suspended, proposed for debarment, declared ineligible or voluntarily excluded from covered
transactions by any Federal or State department or agency. As required by G.S. 143-48.5, the undersigned Vendor certifies that
it, and each of its sub -Contractors for any Contract awarded as a result of this RFP, complies with the requirements of Article 2 of
Chapter 64 of the NC General Statutes, including the requirement for each employer with more than 25 employees in North
Carolina to verify the work authorization of its employees through the federal E-Verify system. G.S. 133-32 and Executive Order
24 (2009) prohibit the offer to, or acceptance by, any State Employee associated with the preparing plans, specifications, estimates
for public Contract; or awarding or administering public Contracts; or inspecting or supervising delivery of the public Contract of
any gift from anyone with a Contract with the State, or from any person seeking to do business with the State. By execution of this
response to the RFP, the undersigned certifies, for your entire organization and its employees or agents, that you are not aware
that any such gift has been offered, accepted, or promised by any employees ❑f your organization.
Failure to execute/sign proposal prior to submittal shall render proposal invalid and it WILL BE REJECTED.
Late proposals cannot be accepted.
COMPLETE/FORMAL NAME OF VENDOR:
Wildlands Engineering, Inc.
STREET ADDRESS:
1430 S. Mint Street, Suite 104
P.O. BOX:
n/a
ZIP: .
28203
CITY & STATE & ZIP;
Charlotte. NC 28203
TELEPHONE NUMBER:
[phone]
TOLL FREE TEL. NO:
n/a
PRINCIPAL PLACE OF BUSINESS ADDRESS IF DIFFERENT FROM ABOVE (SEE INSTRUCTIONS TO VENDORS ITEM #14
n/a
PRINT]
Sh
NAME & TITLE OF PERSON SIGNING ON BEHALF OF VENDOR:
Lin D. Wilkerson, President
FAX NUMBER:
[phone]
VEN
' AU Ho SIGNATUR `
DATE:
03/2512420
EMAIL:
[e-mail]
Offer valid for at least 180 days from date of proposal opening. After this time, any withdrawal of offer shall be made in writing,
effective upon receipt by the agency issuing this RFP.
ACCEPTANCE OF PROPOSAL
If any or all parts of this proposal are accepted by the State of North Carolina, an authorized representative of the Department of
Environmental Quality shall affix his/her signature hereto and this document and all provisions of this Request for Proposal
along with the Vendor proposal response and the written results of any negotiations shall then constitute the written agreement
between the parties_ A copy of this acceptance will be forwarded to the successful Vendor(s).
FOR STATE USE ONLY: Offer accept and Contract awarded this day of , 2020, as indicated on the
attached certification, by
(Authorized Representative of Department of Environmental Quality)
Ver. 4/22119

•
ROY COOPER NORTH CAROLINA
Governor Environmental Quality
MICHAEL S.REGAN
Secretary
TIM BAUMGARTNER
Director
January 22, 2020
THIS ADDENDUM MUST BE RETURNED WITH YOUR TECHNICAL PROPOSAL
Full Delivery Projects to Provide Stream Mitigation Credits
RFP NO. 16-20190304 RFP TITLE: within the Cataloging Units 06010202; 06010203;
06010204 of the Little Tennessee River Basin as
described in the Scope of Work
ADDENDUM NO. 1 USING
AGENCY: DIVISION OF MITIGATION SERVICES
PURCHASER BROOKE OPENING
WELLS DATEITIME: MARCH 26,2020 @ 2:00 P.M.
This correspondence serves as an addendum to the subject RFP. Your response to this RFP should be governed by the
content of the original RFP and the additional information provided in this addendum notice,
SECTION 1: Responses to Vendors Questions:
Questions and Answers:
Question#1: Section 3.2, Pg. 16; Item 17,Attachment B
Prohibited communication is discussed in Section 3.2 on page 16 and in Item 17 of Attachment B on page
30. At various points discussion is prohibited with any state employee, government employee, or private
individual during periods ranging from the evaluation period to the time the procurement is active. Please
clarify to whom(federal, state, or private)and when communication is prohibited.
Answer:
No discussions may occur within the Department,with anyone connected with the State of NC, or with
other vendors. Prohibited communication doesn't apply to Federal government.
Question#2: Paragraph 7. Non-Discrimination(b),Attachment C
Paragraph 7(b)of Attachment C, General Conditions of Contract requires the Vendor to"take all
necessary action to ensure its employee policies and procedures are consistent with Executive Order
#82..." The order applies to state agency employees. Is there an expectation that Vendors implement
this policy for Vendor's employees or that Vendors are aware that this policy exists for state agency
employees?
Answer:
Any vendor must follow law and regulations that applies to them.
Question#3: Section 5.3,Task 2 of the RFP references the December 4, 2019 Survey
Requirements for Full Delivery Projects document.
aE
North Carolina Department or-Environmental quality I Division olMitigatton Services
217 W.]ones Street 11652 Mail Service Center I Raleigh.North Carolina 27699-4652
919,707.8976

Question #3 A) Section 8 of the Survey and Boundary Marking Requirements states, "Access to the
easement area must be shown, with location and width depicted by a dotted line and note on the
recorded plat."
Answer:
Section 8 of the Survey and Boundary Marking Requirements will be revised to say, "Access to the
easement area must be shown, with location and width depicted by a dotted40e and noted on the
recorded plat."
Question#3 S) if the landowner chooses the General Location Option in Section I1 Access Easement of
the Deed of Conservation Easement dated May 11, 2017, are we still required to show a specific dotted
line on the plat?
Answer:
No.
Question#4: Section 2.7, Part G, Current Ownership and Long-Term Protection, Pg. 10-11
The RFP requires an option prepared in accordance with NCGS Chapter 47G-2. Please confirm the state
wants all the requirements of 47G-2 in a Vendor's option agreement. For example, 47G-2(b)(8) states
the option agreement must contain "[a] statement of the rights of the purchaser to cure a default, including
that the purchaser has the right to cure a default once in any 12-month period during the period of the
covered lease agreement."
Answer:
The RFP requires proof that an option agreement per NCGS Chapter 47G-2 has been recorded in the
county for the time period specified in the RFP.
SECTION 2:
Check ONLY ONE of the following categories and if required, return one properly executed
copy of this addendum prior to bid opening time and date.
❑ Bid has already been mailed. Changes resulting from this addendum are
attached.
❑ Bid has already been mailed. NO CHANGES resulted from this addendum,
Bid has NOT been mailed and ANY CHANGES resulting from this addendum are
included in our offer.
PLEASE NOTE—THIS ADDENDUM MUST BE RETURNED WITH YOUR TECHNICAL PROPOSAL.
.DEQ
,J RTn GAO J','
North Carolina Department of Env ironrnenial Quality I Division of Mitigation Services
217 W.Jones Street 11652 Mail SetviceCenter I Raleigh,North Carolina 27699-1652
919,707.8976

SECTION 3:
Execute Addendum:
BIDDER: Wildlands Engineering, Inc.
ADDRESS (CITY& STATE): 1430 S. Mint Street, Suite 104, Charlotte, NC 28203
AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE: 3 \1042-1 DATE: 03/26/2020
Note: It is the offeror's responsibility to guarantee that the offer is received by the Issuing Agency
by the Opening Date/Time noted in the RFP,
Office Address of delivery by any other method
(special delivery,overnight,or any other carrier)
PROPOSAL NUMBER: 16-20190304
NC DEG-DIVISION OF MITIGATION SERVICES
ATTN: BROOKE WELLS
217 WEST JONES STREET, SUITE 3409-1
RALEIGH, NC 27603
IT IS THE OFFER'S RESPONSIBILITY TO CONTINUOUSLY CHECK FOR ADDENDA UP TO THE
LAST POSTED OPENING DATE/TIME AND TO ASSURE THAT ALL ADDENDA HAVE BEEN
REVIEWED, SIGNED AND RETURNED IF REQUIRED.
ALL OTHER TERMS AND CONDITIONS REMAIN THE SAME.
DE
u.wu.vm m enwvrmwnumou=ii,
North Carolina Department of-Environmental Quality I Division of Mitigation Services
21?W.Jones Street i 1652 Mail Service Center I Raleigh,North Carolina 27699.1652
919.70713976

PART D-Executive Summary
Wildlands Engineering, Inc. (Wildlands) is proposing two options to provide cold stream credits within
the Little Tennessee River Basin Catalog Units 06010202, 06010203, and 06010204 at the Cornbread
Valley Mitigation Site (Site) in Macon County, NC (CU 06010202). Option 1 provides restoration of three
reaches of Jones Creek and several unnamed tributaries to provide 4,520 cold stream credits or Option 2
provides 3,634 cold stream credits. Wildlands has recorded an option to acquire an approximately 15-
acre conservation easement on the Site.
The Site is an active cattle farm with horses, x
and the streams are extensively impacted by ' � ` vi i 1 "
livestock grazing. Livestock currently have
access to all of the Site streams. Site streams
are in various stages of evolution, with some
streams being severely incised but not
widened, and other streams being widened x3 �z
and lacking in bedform features due to
manipulation, livestock access and excessive
sedimentation. Extensive streambank "' -'
erosion is present, including a partially x
breached and failing dam embankment on a
small pond. While instream habitats such as Bank erosion on UT3 at the Cornbread
riffles and pools are present on most Valley Mitigation Site
reaches,they are impacted by
embeddedness from bank erosion. Large woody debris (LWD) is lacking on streams that have little or no
woody vegetation. Riparian buffers, where present,typically consist of a single row of trees. More than
half the length of UT1, UT2, UT3, UT3A, and UT3C, as well as Jones Creek Reaches 1 &3 have no buffer.
Only Jones Creek Reach 2 and UT3B have fairly continuous buffer. Throughout the project fecal
coliform, nutrient, and sediment pollutants enter the stream untreated.
This project will improve water quality and ecology through riparian buffer establishment, stream and
habitat restoration, exclusion of livestock and farm equipment, and enhancement of crossings to reduce
hydrologic impacts and aquatic passage barriers. The project will result in a decrease in fecal coliform,
nutrient and sediment loads from the Site and will improve aquatic and terrestrial habitat.The specific
evaluation criteria outlined in the Division of Mitigation's (DMS's) Request for Proposals will be met as
summarized in Part G of this proposal.
In summary, the mitigation plan for the Site will include the following:
• Livestock exclusion from the Site's streams and riparian buffers;
• Reconnection of incised streams to their historic floodplains;
• Enhancement of habitat functions through in-stream structures and native riparian buffers;
• Protection for stream channels from further channel manipulation and vegetation impacts for
agricultural purposes;
• Reduction of fecal coliform, sediment and nutrient loadings by filtering overland runoff from
agricultural fields and providing treatment through protected buffers;
• Generation of up to 4,520 or 3,634 cold stream credits through restoration; and
• Conservation of approximately 15 acres of restored land in perpetuity.
Cornbread Valley Mitigation Site-PART D
Wildlands Engineering, Inc. Page D.1

PART E-Corporate Background and Experience
1.0 Corporate Background
The Wildlands Team is a multidisciplinary group of professionals that brings together the expertise
necessary to create outstanding ecological restoration projects in a timely and cost-effective manner.
Wildlands, the primary offeror, is headquartered in Charlotte, NC.Wildlands has offices in Charlotte, NC;
Raleigh, NC; Asheville, NC; Charleston, SC; and Fairfax,VA. Our 70 employees dedicated to
environmental restoration have positioned Wildlands as a leader in ecosystem restoration in the
southeastern United States.
Wildlands has teamed with Kee Mapping &Surveying(Kee)for survey and easement services for the
Site. Kee is a well-established professional land surveying firm based out of Asheville, NC. Kee has
worked on a variety of projects with Wildlands staff and their experience includes geomorphic
assessment surveys, Global Positioning System (GPS) control for NC State Plane survey work, boundary
surveys for property net verification, easement platting, legal descriptions, and easement
monumentation. Early coordination and frequent communication ensures that everyone understands
their role in the project and can complete tasks in a timely and efficient manner.
Wildlands will consider one of the following five contractors specializing in
stream work or another qualified contractor: West Fork Linville River,constructed , _
• Baker Grading, based in Old Fort, NC by North State Environmental,Inc.
• Carolina Environmental Contracting, Inc., based in Mount Airy, NC - -
• KBS Earthworks, based in Julian, NC 0'''" --
• Land Mechanic Designs, Inc., based in Willow Spring, NC ,�; ,1�1^r
• North State Environmental, Inc., based in Winston Salem, NC
2.0 Ability to Complete all Phases of the Proposal -`
t'�.�- I vntit
Wildlands' success is owed to the skills and abilities of its diverse and
talented staff.Wildlands' staff expertise includes planning, ecology, biology, economics, civil
engineering, real estate, AutoCAD, Geographic Information System (GIS), land management,
environmental consulting, and habitat construction. Our collection of professionals allows for a seamless
approach to planning, permitting, design, construction, and management of restoration projects. We
fully understand the permitting process at the federal, state, and local level. Wildlands has five NC
Certified Floodplain Managers (CFMs) on staff to address local, state, and FEMA floodplain permitting
requirements. We have extensive experience with categorical exclusions, 401/404 permitting, and
sediment and erosion control plans.
3.0 Similar Projects
Wildlands has completed numerous projects involving stream restoration, wetland restoration, and
mitigation banking. Several of these projects are summarized below
Scaly Bark Creek Mitigation Site,Stanly County, NC-Wildlands
it.. ,.. _,. -., performed ecological restoration work at a site near Albemarle, NC.The
- . Eti ` a4, A full-delivery project delivered 6,415 stream credits on Scaly Bark Creek
"r' ri , j'` and six unnamed tributaries in the Yadkin River basin for DMS.The
a , ; .- project included categorical exclusion documentation, existing
r- `: conditions assessment, landowner coordination, conservation easement
.r i.I" acquisition, restoration design, permitting, construction, and five years
of post-construction monitoring. Wildlands successfully completed
r M CLOMR and LOMR packages for this project.This project was
successfully closed out in 2016.
Cornbread Valley Mitigation Site-PART E
Wildlands Engineering, Inc. Page E.1

::: Lyle Creek Mitigation Site, Catawba County, NC-Wildlands completed
- ecological restoration work at a site northwest of Lake Norman in
p x Catawba County, NC.The project provided 5,571 stream credits and 7.0
_Y � � wetland credits on unnamed tributaries to Lyle Creek in the Catawba
1‘?:*n 1 -� _ river basin.The project included categorical exclusion documentation,
��� existing conditions assessment, landowner coordination, conservation
4i. ,4 easement acquisition, stream and wetland restoration design,
• permitting, construction, and post-construction monitoring.
Construction was completed in 2012.This project was successfully
closed out in 2019.
Big Harris Creek Mitigation Site, Cleveland County, NC-This project will
provide approximately 25,836 stream credits in the Broad River basin.
;
The project includes stream enhancement and restoration design, water
quality Best Management Practices (BMPs) design, permitting,
construction, and five years of post-construction monitoring. Nine
storm water BMPs have been implemented to treat agricultural runoff.
k$ This agricultural watershed is impacted by bank erosion and loss of
riparian buffer. Wildlands negotiated credit development with the IRT
y� , � '" _ to recognize a lighter touch approach directed at distinct functional
stressors within the system. Construction was completed in spring 2018
and the project is now in the third year of post-construction monitoring.
Owl's Den Mitigation Site, Lincoln County, NC-Wildlands is developing
a full-delivery project in Lincoln County on two unnamed tributaries to
Howards Creek.The project is expected to provide 2,400 stream credits
in the Catawba River basin and 8.0 wetland credits via wetland re-
--1 •:X a establishment, rehabilitation, and enhancement.The project includes
:rg, categorical exclusion documentation, existing conditions assessment,
' landowner coordination, conservation easement acquisition, stream
and wetland restoration design, permitting, construction, and seven
- years of post-construction monitoring. Detailed hydrologic modeling
was completed to study wetland-groundwater connections.This project
is in the fifth year of post-construction monitoring.
.Aii*ti(ilr Henry Fork Mitigation Site, Catawba County, NC-This project, which
a � involves the reclamation of a former golf course, will deliver 4,500
f �' M stream credits and 4.0 wetland credits through restoration and
,sue a enhancement of streams and rehabilitation, re-establishment, and
4-1' enhancement of wetlands. In addition, outside of the credited activities,
Wildlands purchased the expansive floodplain of the Henry Fork river,
which was placed in permanent conservation easement at no credit as a
- 4 :, value-added benefit of the project.The project is currently in the fifth
• ._-
year of post-construction monitoring.
Cornbread Valley Mitigation Site-PART E
Wildlands Engineering, Inc. Page E.2

Hopewell Mitigation Site,Randolph County, NC-Wildlands is
performing ecological restoration work for this stream mitigation site,
which includes restoration, enhancement, and preservation of a total of
12,308 existing linear feet (LF) of perennial and intermittent stream. By
°;. closeout,the project will deliver 7,389 stream credits in the Yadkin-Pee
r Dee River Basin within hydrologic unit (HU) 03040104(Yadkin 04).The
project includes categorical exclusion documentation, existing
-. fir; conditions assessment, landowner coordination, conservation easement
acquisition, stream restoration,wetland restoration, permitting,
construction, and seven years of post-construction monitoring.
Construction was completed in 2014.
Norkett Branch Mitigation Site, Union County, NC-Wildlands is
developing a full-delivery project in rural Union County on Norkett
•
t: Branch and four tributaries.The project is expected to provide 10,098
l _ ' stream credits for DMS in the Yadkin River basin.The project includes
•' ) existing site assessment, conservation easement acquisition, permitting,
? stream restoration design, construction, and seven years of post-
s_ construction monitoring of geomorphic stability and vegetation.
' Detailed hydraulic modeling was completed for CLOMR and LOMR
approvals.Two stormwater Best Management Practices (BMPs)were
constructed to treat headwater agricultural runoff and will provide
stream credits.This project is currently in the seventh year of post-
construction monitoring.
• az r a Banner Farm Mitigation Site, Henderson County, NC-Wildlands is
performing ecological restoration work on this project located in Mills
*k ze River, NC.The project will provide 6,294 stream credits and 34.0
,V wetland credits in the French Broad River basin.The project will create
; . a significant ecological improvement through restoration of aquatic and
terrestrial habitats.The project will also decrease nutrient and sediment
loads from the watershed by eliminating severe bank erosion,
connecting the onsite streams to their floodplains, restoring native
riparian buffers, restoring natural wetland hydrology to previously
drained areas, and by increasing filtering of overland runoff from
agricultural fields through wetland areas and protected buffers.The
project is currently in design and construction is expected to begin in
August of 2020.
• _ � � A Shake Rag Mitigation Site,Madison County, NC-The project will
provide 6,656 cold stream credits in the French Broad River basin.The
project is creating significant ecological enhancement within the project
• T =, stream corridors by daylighting multiple reaches that were previously
buried for agricultural purposes. Project activities also include removal
of an inline pond, restoration of aquatic and terrestrial riparian habitats
along headwater streams including the daylighting and protection of
multiple seeps, and the re-establishment of a natural step-pool stream
morphology within project streams.The project will also decrease
nutrient and sediment loads from the watershed by replacing ford
crossings with countersunk culverts that facilitate aquatic passage, and
Cornbread Valley Mitigation Site-PART E
Wildlands Engineering, Inc. Page E.3

through restoring native riparian buffers and creation of a SPSC to treat
upland runoff. Construction was completed in December 2019.
4.0 Lead Consultant and Team Members
Wildlands is a licensed engineering firm in NC and will act as prime consultant for this contract. Staff
from our Charlotte, NC and Asheville, NC offices will complete this project. Wildlands has teamed with
Kee to offer the best possible team to DMS. As indicated above in Section 1.0,Wildlands will select a
specialty stream contractor from our provided list of qualified firms.
LEAD CONSULTANT
Wildlands Engineering, Inc. - Headquarters
Charlotte, NC Office Location
1430 South Mint Street, Suite 104
Charlotte, NC 28203
W ILDLANDS (P) 704.332.7754(F) 704.332.3306
E N C I N E h K I N C
Firm Contact:
Shawn Wilkerson, President;[e-mail]
North Carolina S-Corporation
Federal Identification Number: 56-0651376
Asheville, NC Office Location
Wildlands Engineering, Inc.
167-B Haywood Road
Asheville, NC 28806
TEAM MEMBERS
Kee Mapping and Surveying, PA
P.O. Box 2566
Asheville, NC 28802
r - ee (P) 828.575.9021
MAPPING & SURVEYING Firm Contact:
Phillip Brad Kee, PLS; [e-mail]
Services to be Provided: Professional surveying services
5.0 Project Manager Experience
Mr. McLean has 18 years of experience in ecological restoration, storm water management design,
planning and modeling, floodplain management, and hydrologic/hydraulic analysis. At Wildlands, he is
responsible for managing stream and wetland restoration, storm water management and aquatic
organism passage projects, and performs design, hydrologic and hydraulic modeling, floodplain
management consulting and modeling, and final preparation of construction documents in support of
these efforts. Mr. McLean has experience with municipal, non-profit, state and federal restoration and
stormwater project. He has completed Federal Emergency Management Association (FEMA) flood
studies for dozens of stream and floodplain restoration projects, his experience includes minor project
studies, no-rise and map amendment(CLOMR and LOMR) studies. Additional information on Mr.
McLean's experience is provided below in Section 7.0.
Cornbread Valley Mitigation Site-PART E
Wildlands Engineering, Inc. Page E.4

6.0 Project Approach
The Wildlands Team takes a holistic, integrated approach to site restoration.The following text outlines
some key aspects of our multi-disciplinary project approach. Site-specific project plans are further
described in Part G of this proposal.
6.1 Site Selection
The Wildlands Team carefully selects project sites where ecological -,a
restoration can be maximized. Our sites are reviewed by our 1 "
environmental scientists and engineers during the selection process tr ,,
to ensure that ecological uplift can be achieved within regulatory r
parameters related to flood lain management, protected s , x
species,p g p � �
and existing wetland resources. We consult with the existing x ,
landowners to explain the restoration process and the conservation
�e r
easement conditions. We review the site with our contractor to "° sj } k 4. 4
,T '� ¢-et W r r�R �,t y�
identify potential construction challenges and opportunities. .'„vt
�isro� N�_���, .�y:��� �,,,i,� ,`A
6.2 Property Owner Coordination
Property owner coordination begins during the site selection stage and continues throughout the
project. We meet with families to understand the existing and future land use plans for the site. We
work to fully explain the restoration process and review site plans at the conceptual design stage and
final design stage with the property owners to make sure that their concerns are addressed. Our project
manager is the point of contact throughout the project so that the property owners always know who
can answer any questions that may arise.
6.3 Contractor Coordination
Wildlands draws on our contractor's construction expertise early in the project planning phase. We
consult with our contractor so that the project can be designed and constructed in an efficient and cost-
effective manner. We work to identify on-site materials that are native to the existing ecosystem and
that should be incorporated into the restoration project to best mimic natural systems for the site
locale. For example, cobble material embedded in excavated material on mountain stream sites can be
sorted and used for riffle construction. We also know that coordination and flexibility during
construction is the key to a successful restoration site.
6.4 Site Assessment
Numerous methods of assessment are used to quantify and qualify
the site and upstream watershed's stability, nutrient loads, sediment i
-4_4 ;;gym r
transport, hydrologic and hydraulic properties, plant and animal
habitat, ecology, soil conditions, and functional uplift potential. Our
assessment is carried out by surveyors trained in natural channel b
assessment and by field scientists and engineers trained in stream ,44
and wetland assessment and design who know what characteristics i f - '
to look for that will aid in design. Wildlands looks for predictors off 4- ;
future stability problems, such as upstream development and
concentrated overland flow paths.
6.5 Permitting
A project's schedule can be completely disrupted if the permitting for the project is not performed
correctly.The Wildlands Team understands the critical steps necessary for acquiring these permits in a
Cornbread Valley Mitigation Site-PART E
Wildlands Engineering, Inc. Page E.5

timely and efficient manner. Methods used to ensure a rapid permitting process include on-site
meetings with the various permitting agency representatives prior to design, as well as staying up-to-
date on the regulations associated with ecosystem restoration.These steps allow for the submittal of a
thorough and accurate permitting application for our projects.
6.6 Site Design
Once the existing conditions are documented and evaluated, the preferred alternative selected, and
base-mapping developed, a design discharge range is selected based on the project goals. Natural
channel design parameters will be developed based on reference reach data, hydraulic modeling, and
sediment transport assessment.Wildlands has five CFMs on staff who can evaluate design options to
optimize floodplain function and minimize off-site adverse flood elevation impacts. During the
preliminary design the plan view channel location is set, cross-sections for riffles and pools are designed,
and in-stream habitat and grade control structures are located. General grading limits, details, and
easement locations are included at this stage. Property owner input and contractor coordination help to
assure that the proposed design meets the multi-faceted design goals.
6.7 Construction
The Wildlands Team is familiar with the policies, procedures, and # .41J-7', : F�,, 11
practices necessary to construct natural channel design and wetland „ R
restoration projects.Wildlands has provided construction ° `' 3 '
administration and observation services for over 83 miles of stream
work and 459 acres of wetland work.
6.8 Monitoring
Monitoring is an important component to any stream restoration or
enhancement work.The Wildlands Team has experience in both developing monitoring plans for
mitigation projects and in implementing those plans. Our monitoring plan experience includes as-built
surveys and determining whether the project has met its success criteria after the required time period.
7.0 Key Personnel Resumes (Prime and Subconsultant)
This section provides resumes for the Wildlands project manager and the managing staff for our survey
subcontractor on this project. An additional description of the Wildlands project manager's abilities is
provided in Section 5.0. Resumes for remaining personnel on the team are provided in Part F.
Jake McLean, PE,CFM—Wildlands Project Manager
Mr. McLean has 18 years of experience in ecological restoration, stormwater management design,
planning and modeling, floodplain management, and hydrologic/hydraulic analysis.
JOB CLASSIFICATION: Senior Water Resources Engineer
RESPONSIBILITIES FOR THIS PROJECT: Project Manager; Design; Permitting
PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATIONS: Professional Engineer; Certified Floodplain Manager
TOTAL YEARS OF EXPERIENCE: 18 years
EDUCATION: MS, Civil Engineering, Auburn University, 2002
BS, Civil Engineering, Auburn University, 2000
ADDITIONAL TRAINING: NCSU Department of Biological &Agricultural Engineering:
River Course 1-3, 2005-2006
Stream Restoration Construction Training, 2006
Stormwater BMP Academy, 2005
Bioretention/Stormwater Wetlands, 2005
Cornbread Valley Mitigation Site-PART E
Wildlands Engineering, Inc. Page E.6

Stormwater BMP Inspection and Maintenance, 2012
HEC-RAS Unsteady Flow Modeling, 2011
Geomorphic Assessment Workshop, 2006
Natural Channel Design Workshop, 2006
PROJECT EXPERIENCE AT WILDLANDS PROJECT DETAILS PROJECT ROLE
Shake Rag Mitigation Site
Madison County, NC 6,656 stream credits Project Manager
Henry Fork Mitigation Site 4,500 stream credits; Project Manager
Catawba County, NC 4.0 wetland credits
Oak Hill Dairy Mitigation Site 4,630 stream credits; Project Manager
Gaston County, NC 7.6 wetland credits
Banner Farm Mitigation Site 6,294 stream credits;
Henderson County, NC 34.0 wetland credits Design
Big Harris Creek Mitigation Site 25,836 stream credits;
Cleveland County, NC 9 BM Ps Design
Candy Creek Mitigation Site
Guilford County, NC 15,456 stream credits Design
Western Stream Initiative Multiple projects totaling
Multiple Counties in Western NC 15,000 LF of restoration Design
Brad Kee, PLS—Surveyor Subconsultant
With over 20 years of experience in land surveying, Mr. Kee has been a leader in providing high quality
site surveys for clients ranging from land developers to conservation agencies. Mr. Kee is experienced in
geomorphic assessment surveys, conservation easement surveys, boundary surveys for property net
verification, GPS control for NC State Plane survey work, easement platting, legal descriptions, and
easement monumentation. For projects large and small, Kee Mapping& Surveying uses the same care
and integrity to achieve accurate documentation.
PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATION: Professional Land Surveyor NC L-4647
PROJECT EXPERIENCE(WILDLANDS PROJECTS) PROJECT DETAILS PROJECT ROLE
Henry Fork Mitigation Site 4,500 stream credits; Project Surveyor;
Catawba County, NC 4.0 wetland credits Easement Plats
Banner Farm Mitigation Site 6,294 stream credits; Project Surveyor;
Henderson County, NC 34.0 wetland credits Easement Plats
Shake Rag Mitigation Site Project Surveyor;
Madison County, NC 6,656 stream credits Easement Plats
Candy Creek Mitigation Site Project Surveyor;
Guilford County, NC 15,456 stream credits Easement Plats
Owl's Den Mitigation Site 2,400 stream credits; Project Surveyor;
Lincoln County, NC 8.0 wetland credits Easement Plats
Norkett Branch Mitigation Site Project Surveyor;
Union County, NC 10,098 stream credits Easement Plats
Cornbread Valley Mitigation Site-PART E
Wildlands Engineering, Inc. Page E.7

PROJECT EXPERIENCE(WILDLANDS PROJECTS) PROJECT DETAILS PROJECT ROLE
Henry Fork Mitigation Site 4,500 stream credits; Project Surveyor;
Catawba County, NC i 4.0 wetland credits 1 Easement Plats
1
Banner Farm Mitigation Site 6,294 stream credits; I Project Surveyor;
Henderson County, NC 34.0 wetland credits Easement Plats
Shake Rag Mitigation Site Project Surveyor;
Madison County, NC 6,656 stream credits Easement Plats
Reedy Creek Design-Build Stream Restoration Project Topographic and
Charlotte, NC 25,974 stream credits As-Built Survey
DBE/HUB Participation
Three of our potential contractors are woman-owned businesses: Carolina Environmental Contracting,
Inc., Land Mechanic Designs, Inc., and North State Environmental, Inc.
Cornbread Valley Mitigation Site-PART E
Wildlands Engineering, Inc. Page E.8

PART F- Project Organization
1.0 Organizational Chart
The following illustrates the organization of personnel that will be assigned to this project.
1'1;1
Principal-in-Charge Project Manager QA/QC Manager
Shawn Wilkerson Jake McLean, PE,CFM Emily Reinicker,PE,CFM
Categorical Exclusions Existing Conditions Survey Easements Design
Scott Gregory,GISP,PLS Andrea Eckardt Jake McLean,PE,CFM
Andrea Eckardt
Mimi Caddell Ian Hazelhoff Jacob Wiseman,El,CFM
Jordan Hessler Brad Kee,PLS Jordan Hessler
Brad Kee,PLS
Permitting Construction Monitoring
Ian Eckardt Kristi Suggs
Jake McLean,PE,CFM Jacob Wiseman,El,CFM Mimi Caddell
Jordan Hessler
WILDLANDS Asheville, NC Office
WILDIANDS Charlotte,NC Office
Engineering services will be
performed by employees of
■ KEE MAPPING&SURVEY Asheville,NC Office licensed corporate entities.
2.0 Qualifications and Experience
Brief resumes presenting the qualifications, experience, and assigned project responsibilities of each
project team member are presented on the following pages. Resumes for the Wildlands project
manager, Mr.Jake McLean, and for the project manager for Kee were presented in Part E, Section 7.0.
Cornbread Valley Mitigation Site-PART F
Wild lands Engineering, Inc. Page F.1

Shawn Wilkerson
Mr.Wilkerson has 22 years of professional experience in water resources, focusing on surface water
hydrology and restoration. He has managed and designed a diverse range of projects, including wetland/
Best Management Practice (BMP) construction and monitoring, stream restoration and enhancement,
and watershed planning for flood control and water quality improvements. Mr.Wilkerson plays a key
role in initial site evaluation for mitigation and conservation easement acquisition. In the roles of
principal-in-charge or project manager, Mr. Wilkerson has overseen and managed design and
construction for more than 34 miles of stream restoration projects. Several of his key projects have
involved mitigation banking and turn-key mitigation solutions. In his role at Wildlands, he also serves as
the leader of a 70-person team of scientists and engineers that focuses on ecological restoration and
assessments. Mr.Wilkerson focuses on integrating ecologically responsible projects within the
constraints of impacted landscapes while using his experience and education to manage and create
innovative and successful projects.
JOB CLASSIFICATION: President
RESPONSIBILITIES FOR THIS PROJECT: Principal-in-Charge
PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATIONS: NC Real Estate Broker, 2000
TOTAL YEARS OF EXPERIENCE: 22 years
EDUCATION: MS, Civil Engineering, University of North Carolina at Charlotte,
1998
BA, English Literature, Appalachian State University, 1993
ADDITIONAL TRAINING: Rosgen Levels I through IV, 1998-2003
PSMJ Project Manager Boot Camp, 2004, 2014
Mecklenburg Habitat Assessment Protocol Training, 2000
PROJECT EXPERIENCE AT WILDLANDS PROJECT DETAILS PROJECT ROLE
Shake Rag Mitigation Site
Madison County, NC 6,656 stream credits Principal-in-Charge
Banner Farm Mitigation Site 6,294 stream credits; Principal-in-Charge
Henderson County, NC 34 wetland credits
Big Harris Creek Mitigation Site 25,836 stream credits; Project Manager
Cleveland County, NC 9 BMPs
Henry Fork Mitigation Site 4,500 stream credits; Principal-in-Charge
Catawba County, NC 4.0 wetland credits
Candy Creek Mitigation Site
Guilford County, NC 15,456 stream credits Principal-in-Charge
Norkett Branch Mitigation Site
Union County, NC 10,098 stream credits Principal-in-Charge
Scaly Bark Creek Mitigation Site Principal-in-Charge; Project
Stanly County, NC 6,415 stream credits Manager; Conservation
Easement Acquisition
Principal-in-Charge;
Lyle Creek Mitigation Site 5,571 stream credits; Conservation Easement
Catawba County, NC 7.0 wetland credits
Acquisition
Cornbread Valley Mitigation Site-PART F
Wildlands Engineering, Inc. Page F.2

Emily Reinicker, PE,CFM
Ms. Reinicker currently serves as the director of operations and design for Wildlands Engineering. Her
duties include operations optimization for the ecosystem restoration team, technical review and project
management for ecological restoration projects. She has 20 years of professional experience in water
resources and civil engineering, including hydrologic and hydraulic modeling, natural channel design,
watershed analysis, and storm water management. She has been involved in the design of more than
50,000 LF of stream restoration and enhancement work in urban settings and 100,000 LF of streams in
rural settings of NC.
JOB CLASSIFICATION: Senior Water Resources Engineer
RESPONSIBILITIES FOR THIS PROJECT: QA/QC Manager
PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATIONS: Professional Engineer; Certified Floodplain Manager
TOTAL YEARS OF EXPERIENCE: 20 years
EDUCATION: BS, Biosystems Engineering with a Minor in Environmental
Engineering, Clemson University, 1999
ADDITIONAL TRAINING: Project Principal Training, 2016
Project Manager Training, 2004, 2014
Hydraulic Modeling for Stream Restoration & Sediment
Transport, 2011
Applied Fluvial Geomorphology for Engineers, 2006
Stormwater BMP Academy, 2004
Advanced HEC-RAS Training, 2002
Floodplain Map Revision Workshop, 2001
PROJECT EXPERIENCE AT WILDLANDS PROJECT DETAILS PROJECT ROLE
Scaly Bark Creek Mitigation Site
Stanly County, NC 6,415 stream credits Lead Designer
Norkett Branch Mitigation Site
Union County, NC 10,098 stream credits Project Manager
Big Harris Creek Mitigation Site 25,836 stream credits; 9 BMPs Assistant Project
Cleveland County, NC Manager
Reedy Creek Design-Build Stream 25,974 stream credits Project Manager
Restoration Project, Charlotte, NC
Owl's Den Mitigation Site, Lincoln 2,400 stream credits; 8.0 wetland credits Project Manager
County, NC
Lone Hickory Mitigation Site, 12,900 stream credits; 8.0 wetland credits Project Manager
Cleveland County, NC
Cornbread Valley Mitigation Site-PART F
Wildlands Engineering, Inc. Page F.3

Andrea Eckardt
Ms. Eckardt has 22 years of experience in watershed management, environmental planning, permitting,
and geographic information systems (GIS). She currently serves as a senior environmental planner for
Wildlands. She specializes in environmental permitting, watershed management, project development
and implementation, citizen/agency facilitation, grant writing, conservation easement coordination, and
GIS mapping. Ms. Eckardt has experience with municipal and state improvement projects, school and
university improvement projects, non-profit improvement projects, and private development projects.
Ms. Eckardt has facilitated State Property Office coordination of easements for 484 acres of
conservation easements in NC.
JOB CLASSIFICATION: Senior Environmental Planner
RESPONSIBILITIES FOR THIS PROJECT: Categorical Exclusions; Conservation Easement Acquisition Lead
PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATIONS: none
TOTAL YEARS OF EXPERIENCE: 22 years
EDUCATION: MS, Environmental Science, Applied Ecology, Indiana
University, 1996
BS, Biology, Wake Forest University, 1994
ADDITIONAL TRAINING: Consultant Regulatory Workshop, 2007
Financial Benefits of Conservation Easements: Conservation
Programs and Tax Incentives for NC Landowners, 2006
Project Manager Boot Camp, 2005, 2014
Natural Resource Leadership Institute, 2001
PROJECT EXPERIENCE AT WILDLANDS PROJECT DETAILS PROJECT ROLE
Various Full-Delivery Projects 26 full-delivery Categorical Exclusion;
Multiple Counties in NC projects Conservation
Easement Acquisition
Big Harris Creek Mitigation Site 25,836 stream
Cleveland County, NC credits; 9 BMPs Mitigation Plan Lead
Project Manager
Little Troublesome Creek Mitigation Site 4,900 stream credits; (existing condition
Rockingham County, NC 12.7 wetland credits
and design phase)
Crooked Creek#2 Restoration Project 3,489 stream credits; Project Manager
Union County, NC 8.5 wetland credits (conceptual phase)
Burnetts Chapel Mitigation Site 407,649 riparian
Guilford County, NC buffer credits Project Manager
Box Creek Wilderness Area Stream Mitigation Bank
Rutherford County, NC 42,735 stream credits Project Manager
Lone Oak Mitigation Bank Permitting; Banking
Albemarle County, VA 40,462 stream credits Instrument
Cornbread Valley Mitigation Site-PART F
Wildlands Engineering, Inc. Page F.4

Scott Gregory, GISP, PLS
Mr. Gregory has 18 years of experience in geographic information systems (GIS), watershed and
stormwater management planning, and natural channel design. He currently serves as an environmental
scientist for the Asheville, NC office, using GIS spatial analysis and modeling to provide spatial decision
support solutions for a wide variety of water resource, ecological restoration, and environmental
planning projects. He specializes in mapping, mobile and web-based geospatial applications, and data
visualization. Mr. Gregory's experience includes stream design, watershed and stream geomorphic
assessments, stormwater infrastructure inventories, surveying and GPS, and construction management.
JOB CLASSIFICATION: Environmental Scientist
RESPONSIBILITIES FOR THIS PROJECT: Existing Conditions Assessment
PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATIONS: Certified GIS Professional, Professional Land Surveyor
TOTAL YEARS OF EXPERIENCE: 18 years
EDUCATION: MS, Earth Science, University of North Carolina at Charlotte, NC,
2004
BS, Biology with a Minor in Geography/Chemistry, Radford
University, VA, 1995
ADDITIONAL TRAINING: Project Manager Boot Camp, PSMJ Resources, 2005
Intermittent& Perennial Stream ID for Riparian Buffer Rules,
NCDWQ, 2005
HEC-HMS Training, Dodson, 2001
PROJECT EXPERIENCE AT WILDLANDS PROJECT DETAILS PROJECT ROLE
Existing Conditions
Big Harris Mitigation Site 25,836 stream credits; Assessment; Reference
Cleveland County, NC 9 BMPs
Reach Identification
Shake Rag Mitigation Site
Madison County, NC 6,656 stream credits Lead Scientist
Banner Farm Mitigation Site 6,294 stream credits; Lead Scientist; Design
Henderson County, NC 34.0 wetland credits
Candy Creek Mitigation Site Existing Conditions
Guilford County, NC 15,456 stream credits Assessment
Western Stream Initiative Multiple projects Existing Conditions
Multiple Counties in Western NC totaling 15,000 LF Assessment; Design;
Construction Oversight
Reedy Creek Design-Build Stream Restoration
Project, Charlotte, NC 25,974 stream credits GIS Analysis
Box Creek Wilderness Area Stream Mitigation Existing Conditions
Bank Rutherford County, NC 42,735 stream credits Survey; Construction
Oversight
East Buffalo Stream Mitigation Bank
Graham County, NC 4,051 stream credits Lead Scientist; Design
Cornbread Valley Mitigation Site-PART F
Wildlands Engineering, Inc. Page F.5

Mimi Caddell
Ms. Caddell has five years of experience related to watershed resources. She has assisted with water
quality grant projects such as stormwater best management practices and conservation land monitoring
in Western North Carolina. Additionally, she is experienced with community outreach by working with
volunteer groups on invasive plant species projects and carrying out watershed education programs. Ms.
Caddell's duties at Wildlands include vegetation and geomorphic assessments and data processing, GIS
mapping, and site maintenance.
JOB CLASSIFICATION: Environmental Scientist
RESPONSIBILITIES FOR THIS PROJECT: Existing Conditions Survey; Monitoring
PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATIONS: none
TOTAL YEARS OF EXPERIENCE: 5 years
EDUCATION: BS, Environmental Science, University of North Carolina at
Chapel Hill, 2014
ADDITIONAL TRAINING: NC Stream Assessment Method—Certification Training, NCAEP,
2018
Surface Water Identification Training and Certification, 2018
River Course 201 - Natural Channel Design Principles, 2018
River Course 101: Stream Morphology Assessment, 2017
Stormwater BMP Maintenance & Inspection, 2015
PROJECT EXPERIENCE AT WILDLANDS PROJECT DETAILS PROJECT ROLE
Deep Meadow Mitigation Site 2,746 stream credits; Existing Conditions
Union County, NC 8.1 wetland credits Assessment
Big Harris Creek Mitigation Site 25,836 stream credits; Monitoring
Cleveland County, NC 9 BMPs
Candy Creek Mitigation Site Existing Conditions
Guilford County, NC 15,456 stream credits Assessment; Monitoring
Henry Fork Mitigation Site 4,500 stream credits; Monitoring
Catawba County, NC 4.0 wetland credits
Existing Conditions
Banner Farm Mitigation Site 6,294 stream credits; Assessment; Mitigation
Henderson County, NC 34.0 wetland credits
Development Plan
Shake Rag Mitigation Site
Madison County, NC 6,656 stream credits Monitoring
Existing Conditions
Wyant Lands Mitigation Site 6,800 stream credits; Assessment; Mitigation
Lincoln County, NC 12.0 wetland credits
Development Plan
Hopewell Mitigation Site
Randolph County, NC 7,389 stream credits Monitoring
Crooked Creek#2 Restoration Project 5,672 stream credits; Monitoring
Union County, NC 11.5 wetland credits
Cornbread Valley Mitigation Site-PART F
Wildlands Engineering, Inc. Page F.6

Jordan Hessler
Mr. Hessler currently serves the Asheville office as an Environmental Scientist/Designer. He has four
years of experience in civil engineering, Auto CAD applications, Graphic information systems,
stormwater management, and soil and sediment control measures. Additional skills include wetland
land delineation and permitting, construction quality assurance, landscape design, vegetation surveys,
threatened and endangered species survey. Mr. Hessler is responsible for wetland delineations, post-
construction monitoring, existing geomorphic surveys, regulatory permitting, agency correspondence,
design support, and construction oversight.
JOB CLASSIFICATION: Environmental Scientist/Designer
RESPONSIBILITIES FOR THIS PROJECT: Existing Conditions Survey; Design, Monitoring
PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATIONS: none
TOTAL YEARS OF EXPERIENCE: 4 years
EDUCATION: BS, Biology(concentration in ecology&evolution), Western
Carolina University, 2015
AAS, Horticulture Technology, Haywood Community College,
2011
ADDITIONAL TRAINING: Wetland Delineation & Permitting Training
NC State: River Course 201 Natural Channel Design
NCDOT Level 1 Erosion & Sediment control/stormwater
certification
Southern Appalachian Ephemeroptera, Plecoptera, and
Tricoptera Identification Training
PROJECT EXPERIENCE AT WILDLANDS PROJECT DETAILS PROJECT ROLE
Shake Rag Mitigation Site 6 656 stream credits Existing Conditions
Madison County, NC Assessment
Existing Conditions
Banner Farm Mitigation Site 6,294 stream credits; Assessment; Design
Henderson County, NC 34.0 wetland credits
Assistance
Existing Conditions
Wyant Lands Mitigation Site 6,800 stream credits; Assessment; Design
Lincoln County, NC 12.0 wetland credits
Assistance
Henry Fork Mitigation Site 4,500 stream credits; Monitoring
Catawba County, NC 4.0 wetland credits
Vile Creek Mitigation Site 5,000 stream credits; Monitoring
Alleghany County, NC 5.0 wetland credits
Oak Hill Dairy Mitigation Site 4,630 stream credits; Scientist
Gaston County, NC 7.6 wetland credits
Cornbread Valley Mitigation Site-PART F
Wildlands Engineering, Inc. Page F.7

Ian Hazelhoff
Mr. Hazelhoff is an experienced land manager and conservation planner and is passionate about land
remediation. At Wildlands he is responsible for identification, landowner negotiation, and closure of
conservation easements and land use agreements on riparian corridors in North Carolina, Virginia, and
South Carolina for the purpose of stream, wetland, and buffer mitigation projects. In addition, Mr.
Hazelhoff is responsible for nutrient and buffer credit sales from existing Wildlands-owned mitigation
banks.
JOB CLASSIFICATION: Land Acquisition & Mitigation Development
RESPONSIBILITIES FOR THIS PROJECT: Conservation Easement Acquisitions
PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATIONS: NC Realtor° Broker
TOTAL YEARS OF EXPERIENCE: 6 years
EDUCATION: BS, Biology, Sewanee: The University of the South, 2013
PROJECT EXPERIENCE AT WILDLANDS PROJECT DETAILS i PROJECT ROLE
Wyant Lands Mitigation Site 6,800 stream credits; Conservation Easement
Lincoln County, NC 12.0 wetland credits Acquisition; Broker
Huntsman Mitigation Site ' Conservation Easement
Wilkes County, NC 6,000 stream credits Acquisition; Broker
East Buffalo Mitigation Bank Site Conservation Easement
Graham County, NC 4,051 stream credits Acquisition; Broker
Bug Headwaters Mitigation Site Conservation Easement
Wilkes County, NC 7,608 stream credits Acquisition; Broker
Oak Hill Dairy Mitigation Site 4,630 stream credits; ' Conservation Easement
Gaston County, NC 7.6 wetland credits Acquisition; Broker
Cornbread Valley Mitigation Site-PART F
Wildlands Engineering, Inc. Page F.8

Jacob Wiseman, El,CFM
Mr.Wiseman currently serves as an environmental designer in Wildlands Engineering's Asheville, NC
office. He has nine years of experience in hydrologic and hydraulic modeling, bioengineering, and has an
extensive background in erosion control and stormwater management. As an environmental designer,
Mr.Wiseman assists with planning, hydrologic and hydraulic modeling, design, and monitoring of
ecological restoration and stormwater projects.
JOB CLASSIFICATION: Environmental Designer
RESPONSIBILITIES FOR THIS PROJECT: Construction
PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATIONS: Engineering Intern (NC), Certified Floodplain Manager(NC)
TOTAL YEARS OF EXPERIENCE: 9 years
EDUCATION: MS, Biological and Agricultural Engineering, North Carolina
State University, 2011
BS, Biological and Agricultural Engineering, Environmental
Engineering Concentration, North Carolina State University,
2008
ADDITIONAL TRAINING: Level III Design of Erosion and Sediment Control Plans
Certification, NCDOT, Cert#3530
NCSU Stormwater BMP Inspection and Maintenance
Certification, Cert#2465
PROJECT EXPERIENCE AT WILDLANDS PROJECT DETAILS PROJECT ROLE
Shake Rag Mitigation Site
Madison County, NC 6,472 stream credits Design; Construction Oversight
Britton Creek Stabilization Project 1,500 LF Construction Oversight
City of Hendersonville, NC
White Buffalo Mitigation Site
Surry County, NC 5,045 stream credits Design
Plantation Branch Mitigation Site 5,045 stream credits Existing Conditions Assessment;
Surry County, NC Design
Western Stream Initiative Multiple projects
Multiple Counties in Western NC totaling 15,000 LF Existing Conditions Assessment
Tomahawk Branch Stream Enhancement 1,100 LF Design; Construction Oversight
Black Mountain, NC
Swannanoa Streambank Stabilization 500 LF Design; Construction Oversight
Buncombe County, NC
Cornbread Valley Mitigation Site-PART F
Wildlands Engineering, Inc. Page F.9

Ian Eckardt, Pws
Mr. Eckardt has 15 years of experience in stream geomorphic assessments, stream classification,
wetland delineation, protected species surveys, sediment sampling and analysis, water quality
monitoring, groundwater monitoring, surveying, and vegetation assessment. He currently serves as an
environmental scientist for Wildlands Engineering and is responsible for regulatory permitting, agency
correspondence, wetland delineations, geomorphic surveys and assessments, protected species surveys,
and post-construction monitoring.
JOB CLASSIFICATION: Senior Environmental Scientist
RESPONSIBILITIES FOR THIS PROJECT: Permitting
PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATIONS: Professional Wetland Scientist
TOTAL YEARS OF EXPERIENCE: 15 years
EDUCATION: MS, Earth Science, University of North Carolina at Charlotte,
2007
BA, Geology, NC State University, 2001
ADDITIONAL TRAINING: NC SAM Certificate Training, 2017
Basic Processes in Hydric Soils, 2013
Advanced Problems in Hydric Soil Evaluation, 2013
Rosgen Level I, 2013
Surface Water Identification Training and Certification, 2013
NC WAM Certificate Training, 2010
Management of Invasive and Exotic Vegetation in Riparian
Areas, 2009
North Carolina Rare Plant Identification Workshops, 2007 &
2011
Delineation of Piedmont and Coastal Plain Jurisdictional
Wetlands, 2007
PROJECT EXPERIENCE AT WILDLANDS PROJECT DETAILS PROJECT ROLE
Deep Meadow Mitigation Site 2,746 stream credits; Existing Conditions Assessment
Union County, NC 8.1 wetland credits
Big Harris Creek Mitigation Site 25,836 stream credits;
Cleveland County, NC 9 BMPs Existing Conditions Assessment
Henry Fork Mitigation Site 4,500 stream credits; Existing Conditions Assessment;
Catawba County, NC 4.0 wetland credits Permitting
Hopewell Mitigation Site Existing Conditions Assessment;
Randolph County, NC 7,389 stream credits Categorical Exclusion; Permitting;
Monitoring
Norkett Branch Mitigation Site 10,098 stream credits Categorical Exclusion; Permitting;
Union County, NC Monitoring
lxisting Conditions Assessment;
Owl's Den Mitigation Site 2,400 stream credits; Categorical Exclusion; Permitting;
Lincoln County, NC 8.0 wetland credits Monitoring
Scaly Bark Creek Mitigation Site
Stanly County, NC 6,415 stream credits Monitoring
Cornbread Valley Mitigation Site-PART F
Wildlands Engineering, Inc. Page F.10

Kristi Suggs
Ms. Suggs currently serves as a senior environmental scientist and the monitoring lead coordinator for
Wildlands. She has over 16 years of experience in watershed management, environmental planning and
permitting, and GIS. Her expertise includes geomorphic assessments, stream classification,wetland
delineation, biological and habitat assessment, protected species surveys, sediment sampling and
analysis,water quality monitoring, groundwater monitoring, benthic macroinvertebrate sampling,
vegetation assessment, GIS mapping, and post-construction monitoring.
JOB CLASSIFICATION: Senior Environmental Scientist
RESPONSIBILITIES FOR THIS PROJECT: Monitoring Lead
PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATIONS: none
TOTAL YEARS OF EXPERIENCE: 16 years
EDUCATION: MS, Earth and Environmental Resource Management, University
of South Carolina, 2005
BS, Animal Veterinary Science, West Virginia University, 1995
ADDITIONAL TRAINING: NC Wetland Assessment Method Training Certification, 2016
NC Stream Assessment Method Training Certification, 2016
NC Natural Heritage Data Explorer Training, 2015
Mussel Identification Workshop-Atlantic Slope Species of NC
and SC, 2015
Piedmont Rare Species and Mafic Rock Communities Workshop,
2014
2011 Rare Plant&Community Identification Workshop, 2011
Surface Water Identification and Training Class, V. 4.0, 2010
Wetland Delineation and Jurisdictional Determination: Post
Rapanos-Carabel, 2008
Stream Restoration Design Introduction, Existing Conditions
Analysis, and Preliminary Design, 2007
Intermittent and Perennial Stream Identification for Regulatory
Applications, 2007
PROJECT EXPERIENCE AT WILDLANDS PROJECT DETAILS PROJECT ROLE
Henry Fork Mitigation Site 4,500 stream credits; Monitoring
Catawba County, NC 4.0 wetland credits
Candy Creek Mitigation Site
Guilford County, NC 15,456 stream credits Monitoring
Big Harris Creek Mitigation Site 25,836 stream credits; Monitoring
Cleveland County, NC 9 BMPs
Norkett Branch Mitigation Site
Union County, NC 10,098 stream credits Monitoring
Hopewell Mitigation Site
Randolph County, NC 7,389 stream credits Monitoring
Reedy Creek Design-Build Stream
Restoration Project, Charlotte, NC 25,974 stream credits As-built monitoring report
Cornbread Valley Mitigation Site-PART F
Wild lands Engineering, Inc. Page F.11

Part G -Technical Approach
The Cornbread Valley Mitigation Site (Site) is in Macon County approximately 6 miles southwest of the
Town of Franklin (Figure 1).The project includes restoration and enhancement of project streams.The
project is located within the Cartoogechaye Creek Targeted Local Watershed Hydrologic Unit Code
(HUC) 06010202020030, and this HUC has been identified as a Targeted Resource Areas (TRA)for water
quality, hydrology and habitat (Interactive Map ID
19736155) by the NC Department oft z„g ' '—
Environmental Quality Division of Mitigation ,. , `111 ,
Services (DMS). '' ..
The Site contains Jones Creek(referred to on t, < 'w ~_A , `
cadm
some more recent USGS maps as James Creek) ` ° �;``
and several unnamed tributaries (UTs)to Jones L '. "'44, r
Creek,which have been given names for this -^ ',,
proposal (UT1, UT2, UT3, UT3A, UT3B, UT3C).The ; - :' ,•`•" .-;' ,>,r.
Site is located within DWR Subbasin 04-04-01. Aerial photo of Jones Creek and UT2
Jones Creek is defined as WS-III;Tr waters in the
NCDEQ classification schedule for the Little Tennessee (Stream Index Number 2-19-2).This watershed is
the source of the Town of Franklin's drinking water. WS-III waters are low to moderately developed
watersheds used as sources of water supply where a
more protective WS-I or II classification is not feasible. k .
These waters are also protected for Class C uses for �,-" • E. RV'1 i A '
secondaryrecreation, ishin wildlife, aquatic life ,1 ey# aid
z: � Z`i �` '-
g, q ; ' f' f
propagation, agriculture, and maintenance of biological , , y� „ : 4-(4p , ��
integrity.Jones Creek is a major tributaryto a x ' F' ,. � ty -\,
Cartoogechaye Creek and joins with Allison Creek two � k ;,i w. pg. � ` tmiles downstream to form Cartoogechaye Creek in the A ,IL r r . a
Maidens Chapel area.The aquatic habitat in �,: 4` ,� 1, 4 - { ' .
p q A
Cartoogechaye Creek is designated as a Significant ' ,�, - - �.' 4,
Natural Heritage Area. Actively eroding stream bank at
Cornbread Valley Mitigation Site
1.0 Project Goals and Objectives
The major goals of the proposed stream mitigation ''- + 1qyr,
project are to provide ecological and water quality j ►
enhancements within the broader Little Tennessee River Ati ; ` :,'.
Basin while realizing these same benefits at the site level „il.z �„ s ' ,J,a "'
through activities to enhance the function of stream and 7 `' r. ' -- A .
riparian components of the Site. „' t''� , . •x ' '
Site stressors include livestock access to streams, stream "" , , r;.I<, °• iw; ,Ar-At ,• y
incision and lateral bank erosion, barriers to hydrology y ,,c , :'�
and aquatic organism passage, absent, narrow and poor - °� ` ' '
quality buffers, and areas of low to absent bedform Livestock impacts to buffer at
diversity. Cornbread Valley Mitigation Site
Specific enhancements to water quality, hydrology, and habitat are outlined in Table G.1.Watershed
ecological uplift potential and specific calculations supporting these goals and objectives are located in
Section 3.
Cornbread Valley Mitigation Site-PART G
Wildlands Engineering, Inc. Page G.1

According to the Basinwide Plan, the Cartoogechaye Creek subwatershed has been previously studied in
detail by the Little Tennessee Watershed Association (LTWA). Fish community monitoring efforts at 14
sites within the subwatershed documented a high incidence of blackspot, a parasitic infection often
associated with organic enrichment. LTWA also documented livestock access to streams as a concern in
the upper Cartoogechaye watershed, and in Jones Creek specifically.The Basinwide Plan cites
inadequate riparian buffers in the subwatershed, recommends nutrient and erosion control measures,
and identified the prevalence of stream restoration opportunities in the Cartoogechaye Creek
watershed. It also recommends the use of detailed information provided by LTWA to address the most
significant problems in the watershed.
Beginning two miles downstream of the Site, Cartoogechaye Creek is an Aquatic Significant Natural
Heritage Area of state significance.
Sources:
NC Division of Mitigation Services.2018.Little Tennessee River Basin Restoration Priorities June 2008 Amended July 2018.
https://deq.nc.gov/about/divisions/water-resources/planning/basin-planning/water-resource-plans/little-tennessee-2007.
https://deq.nc.gov/about/divisions/mitigation-services/dms-planning/watershed-planning-documents/little-tennessee-river-basin
http://www.l ittlet.org/wp-content/u ploads/2015/11/2011-State-of-the-Streams.pdf
Table G.1 Water Quality,Hydrology,and Habitat Goals of the Mitigation Project
Site Functional Functional Uplift Potential Site Goal Site Objective
Stressors
Water Quality: High—Approximately 75%of the riparian Restore and • Convert active livestock pasture to
zones on site are not forested. Invasive supplement forested riparian buffers along all
Non- species are present and dense on some native Site streams.
functioning reaches.The project will address these floodplain • Protect and enhance existing buffers.
riparian buffer
conditions. vegetation • Treat invasive species.
Very High—Significant sources of
sediment include severely incised and
eroding streams,a breached and eroding • Restore or enhance stream channels
Water Quality: dam embankment,and erosion from to provide stable dimensions and
Sediment uplands entering streams through narrow geomorphically appropriate form.
or non-existent buffer. Multiple stream • Add bank revetments and instream
reaches are severely incised but have only
begun to widen.Sediment transport is Reduce structures to protect restored/
hindered by prior stream alterations. sediment, enhanced streams during
nutrient,and revegetation process.
Very High—Sediment erosion and fecal coliform • Restore riparian stream corridor
livestock inputs represent significant input from vegetation to slow and filter runoff
nutrient sources.The project is expected adjacent from adjacent agricultural fields.
Water Quality: reduce TN by 776 Ibs/yr and TP by 64 agricultural • Reestablish sediment transport
Nutrients Ibs/yr based on 15.2 acres of new fields. Reduce continuity in aggrading areas.
livestock exclusion. Runoff filtration sediment and • Install/improve fencing and
through buffers and BMPs is expected to nutrient inputs watering as needed to exclude
reduce nutrients.
from livestock from streams and riparian
Very High Exclusion of livestock and land streambank areas,and/or exclude livestock from
conversion will reduce fecal coliform erosion. adjacent fields.
loading by approximately 6.545E+11 • Install BMP above both UT3A&
Water Quality: col/yr.These pollutants will be further UT3B.
reduced by eliminating approximately 10
Fecal coliform acres of pasture, planting vegetated • Repair erosion and buffer lower
buffers on 75%of the site,and uncredited section of Jones Creek.
implementing BMPs to treat agricultural
runoff.
Cornbread Valley Mitigation Site-PART G
Wildlands Engineering, Inc. Page G.2

Site Functional Functional Uplift Potential Site Goal Site Objective
Stressors
Moderate—Severely incised channels are Reconnect
present in some reaches.The existing streams to • Reconnect incised streams to their
pond on UT2 and other undersized floodprone floodplains through restoration and
crossings alter natural watershed areas and enhancement I approaches.
hydrology. Manmade levies confine flood floodplains. • Remove levies to reestablish
Hydrology: Remove floodplain and floodprone area
Peak Flows flows on multiple tributaries. Incised historic functions.
channels will be restored using Priority 1 alterations • Remove the existing breached pond
restoration,the existing partially that adversely and reestablish a natural stream
breached pond will be removed,and impact channel dimension and profile.
culverts will be replaced for increased watershed • Construct BMPs that attenuate
hydrologic function.
hydrology. runoff from pasture areas.
Hydrology: High—Three small diameter and perched Improve • Embed and size new culverted
culverts adversely impacts aquatic instream crossings for bankfull dimensions to
Artificial organism passage.A partially breached habitat allow for aquatic passage.
Barriers pond on UT2 makes passage impossible. connectivity.
Moderate—Barriers are discussed above. Increase the
Furthermore, high quality habitat and level of • Install riparian vegetation that filters
refugia are less common and fragmented runoff,shades and cools streams
Habitat: connectivity
Habitat by widespread stream instability, poor and quality of and adds important carbon inputs.
buffer quality, hydrologic and water • Implement habitat features that
Fragmentation habitat
quality impacts. Project activities will create bedform diversity,cover and
address both physical barriers, habitat available on carbon retention in streams.
quality and continuity. the Site.
Moderate-Bedforms are impacted by • Install grade control step features
sedimentation and livestock impacts. constructed with rock,wood,and
Habitat: Proposed project activities will create brush to create stable and diverse
Limited diverse bedforms including riffles, pools of bedform.
Bedform varying depth, log and/or rock step-pool Improve • Install plunge and constriction
Diversity features along with cover habitat and instream features to induce pool formation in
woody structure. habitat and reaches lacking pools.
incorporate • Add woody materials/LWD as grade
restoration control, revetments,cover,and
Moderate—Multiple project streams lack strategies that hydraulic features to improve pool
large woody debris, leaf packs,and provide short- formation,variability of habitat,and
Habitat: organic debris, particularly in reaches with and long-term to increase retention of coarse
Absence of minimal or no buffer. Restoration carbon organic matter.
Large Woodyactivities will install woody structure for sources. • Reestablish forested riparian
g grade control to enhance bedform
Debris floodplain habitat to create long
stability,and for cover throughout the
term source of woody debris.
project restoration and enhancement I • Install roughness features such as
reaches. brush toes that enhance retention
of carbon within stream reaches.
• Establish a conservation easement
Permanently on the site.
protect the • Restrict livestock access on non-
N/A N/A project site credited streams through existing or
from harmful proposed fencing,and through
uses. inclusion in the easement where
possible.
Cornbread Valley Mitigation Site-PART G
Wildlands Engineering, Inc. Page G.3

2.0 Project Description
The following section describes the existing conditions at the Site in terms of geomorphic condition,
watershed, soils, geology, cultural resources, species of concern, regulated floodplain zones, and site
constraints. Figure 2 provides a Site map.
2.1 Existing Site Conditions
The Site is located approximately 6 miles southwest of Franklin in Macon County, NC. All of the site is
currently maintained for livestock pasture.The Site represents a significant portion of the grazed lands
within the Jones Creek subwatershed, one of two primary subwatersheds to Cartoogechaye Creek.
On March 11, 2020, all Site streams were evaluated and scored;Jones Creek, UT1, UT2, UT3, and UT3A,
UT3B, and UT3C were identified as perennial within the project limits. A short segment of UT3A was
identified as intermittent. Stream forms are included in the appendix. Figure 2 maps the stream
conditions and floodplain alterations on the Site. Details about the existing streams and associated
reaches are provided in Section 2.2 below.
Riparian buffers are typically absent, one-sided or narrow ;+
throughout all project reaches, except UT3B. On Jones Creek • , :,r s
Reaches 1 &2, the proposed enhancement reaches have
narrow buffers that are partially functioning due to the
maturity of woody vegetation within those narrow buffers r :-
along the top of bank. On short reaches (<20%estimated) of � " r
UT2, UT3A, UT3C, and UT3, similar conditions of narrow but � ` �?
moderately effective buffer exist. Invasive species are present Multiflora rose is abundant in pastures
throughout the project area; these species include multiflora along UT3
rose (Rosa multiflora) and Japanese honeysuckle (Lonicera
japonica). Invasive species are particularly dense along UT1,the lower portion of UT2, and are prevalent
along portions of UT3.
Along most of the Site streams,vegetation consists of pasture grass species such as fescue (Festuca spp.)
along with wetland grasses such as soft rush (Juncus effuses) in wetter areas. Where present,woody
vegetation is often a narrow strip of alders (Alnus serrulata) or intermittent trees. In areas where buffers
are narrow,they still provide critical shading of the steam and deep-rooted vegetation for stability.
However, the narrow buffer width leaves streams at significant
risk of undermined trees falling into the stream and major bank
erosion. .41
•..\~' `
In areas with narrow buffer strips and along UT3B,vegetation r
typically consists of bottomland mixed-hardwood forest species,
including tag alder(Alnus serrulata), sycamore (Platanus
occidentalis), red maple (Acer rubrum),tulip poplar(Liriodendron
tulipifera), eastern red cedar (Juniperus virginiana), willow (Salix
spp.), black walnut (Juglans nigra), and American hornbeam +
(Carpinus caroliniana). River cane (Arundinaria gigantaea)was ';x�t•` �� ,r
also observed just off the Site along Jones Creek. tA review of historic aerials from 1954 to 2016 shows the Site ;�# - 4 •streams have existed in their approximate locations over time. �. ::,�
UT1 appears to have been ditched after 1954 but prior to 1964. ' .
The Site use has remained consistent as livestock pasture,
although fields north of UT3 have also been used for row crops in NCDOT aerial imagery 1964
Cornbread Valley Mitigation Site-PART G
Wildlands Engineering, Inc. Page G.4

some years.The pond dam on UT2 has been present prior to 1975—it appears to be visible in the 1975
aerial and is definitively in the 1984 aerial.
2.2 Existing Conditions-Streams
Jones Creek— Reach 1 (Upper Field)
Jones Creek flows onto the Site from the south and is a cobble-gravel stream with occasional boulders. It
is semi-confined with a hybrid of step-pool and meander planform morphology.Jones Creek at the
upstream easement limits has a wooded buffer and is relatively stable for a short length before entering
a reach that lacks a woody buffer on one or both banks. In this reach, outside meander bend erosion
and mid-channel bar formation is present. It is likely that prior manipulation of the stream and valley,
namely stream relocation along with construction of berms along the channel top of bank to prevent
flooding in fields, has resulted in flow conveyance discontinuity (loss of and/or excessive stream power)
and physical irregularities in the flood prone area. Unvegetated banks are subject to erosion and lateral
migration from extreme flood events, or repetitive moderate events, as the channel adjusts as a
response to manmade irregularities. Based on visual observation, bank height ratios are in excess of 1.0
but less than 1.5.
Below this unstable area,Jones Creek returns to relative stability with deep-rooted vegetation on both
banks. Buffer widths, however, are narrow and there is currently livestock access to the creek. UT1
enters from the right bank upstream of Allison Watts Road.
1 r '
h;
•
,�- � �
...
•
Jones Creek-proposed restoration reach Jones Creek above Allison Watts Rd
UT1
UT1 begins at the r , tiAtIry�`' � !."i., ;
southern Site property + ,.. ter _ Y ` (� (
boundary at a piped ,ea"t ��i' `�1� 4 `��� �) I 4,;
outlet delivering flow • - .tri•
from a small drainage of fit: • Y "ri"sf% 1;1 / y
approximately 23 acres. r r +��= ' �� d m
UT1 appears to have
been ditched in the
1960's based on review UT1 comparison of upper and lower segment vegetation and bed conditions
of aerial photography.
The upper portion of the reach has not been allowed to grow up, while the lower half has been allowed
to establish a narrow row of alders.This difference in vegetation results in a difference in bedform with
the shaded area exhibiting a coarser riffle substrate (consisting of sand and gravel)with less grass
growing within the wetted perimeter. Sidecast materials from historic ditching are present along the
Cornbread Valley Mitigation Site-PART G
Wildlands Engineering, Inc. Page G.5

right bank throughout the reach.This material is densely covered with multifora rose. A non-project
stream enters from the right mid-reach and has an existing crossing. Livestock have access to the creek
throughout reach. Some minor bank eroion is present and both the left and right banks are tall,
confining flow within the historically ditched channel.
Jones Creek— Reach 2 (Middle Field) %, ) cam, `- ,
Jones Creek continues below Allison Watts Road through l '�'S
livestock pastures but with relative stability maintained by ,, ,/ A ,
deep-rooted vegetation on both banks.The buffer widths are t- g•• i I .�
narrow and there is currently livestock access to the creek. - -., 4 ,- " 4
There are short segments within this reach that have minor ;, f `' �" W ,.•
bank toe erosion, or that are slightly overwide. Multflora rose is y. .- a, "`•
present within the reach and is locally dense in a couple of 4 s• :
areas.Jones Creek is poorly aligned to the downstream bridge Jones Creek looking downstream from
and as a result has been stabilized by NCDOT with riprap. Allison Watts Rd
UT2
The stream origin for UT2 begins upstream of the pond at a Upper UT2 stream origin at spring box
spring head. The right bank is wooded with no livestock access. =; ., _'
Prior manipulation for water diversion is present. Below the ` ' 4.
source, the stream has tall streambanks with woody vegetation " ,, - ,
but also exhibits alternating erosion. 150 LF downstream, there • _I ,- �;_,
is a small pond—the earthen pond dam has failed (breached)
and is actively eroding, threatening to headcut through the old .." - - - , x`
and bed and export the stored sediment. Significant quantities �" `' ' �- _ ; ` '`
of sediment have already been released and have smothered r; - •" .'';;=--
habitat downstream within the reach. Below the breach, there r - ;, r • _
is a second minor headcut and buffer starts to narrow. Bank
erosion is prevalent for about 150 LF where after the bed i , i 4•• fs, t.
stabilizes and quickly becomes depositional. At this point, the , ,..
w �
narrow buffers end, and both banks are in pasture. s f `ti " t • _
'This depositional area is completely lacking in stream bedform ii "°` _
� ' ,.:y. 4 ,„ il\
and appears likely to grow thick with vegetation due to historic a,, F
.11 r . .
straightening/ditching and excessive sediment supply.The � • � ,� . " . „.
• , , : ,:
reach has discontinuous fencing that is not excluding livestock. r, r ., y ,f
Where present, fencing is immediately abutting the stream ( �' ,•. , '.� ` ' u'
leaving no buffer.There is a culverted crossing mid-reach and Eroding streambank near pond breach
the lower portion of the reach adjacent to the road is
overgrown with multiflora rose and honeysuckle. Sediment deposition in UT2 channel
Water from the spring origin at the top of UT2 serves the ..;.�I.0 vi • d •i ga ;Li,,,y
residence along North Jones Creek Road;the line runs down ` ,, , 4 a
the creek as depicted in the photos and will be relocated as I -"
part of the project.The spring box area has been left out of the _,c,�i •• § .
easement area, but can be included with an exception to allow i Y
the spring box and piping ifpreferred byDMS. i • -
p g p•p• g • .. i ��.
Cornbread Valley Mitigation Site-PART G
Wildlands Engineering, Inc. Page G.6

Jones Creek— Reach 3 (Lower Field)
Jones Creek continues in pasture below Jones Creek Road - aid • ;
nto
(Reach 3). Livestock use the bridge opening for access ti
between the Middle and Lower Field. The buffer widths are sT , .�
�}
narrow or non-existant and there is currently livestock access i
to the creek throughout. Livestock use is extensive / - 1
immediately downstream of the bridge as this is a crossing
area between the larger pasture on the right floodplain and
the barn. Below that, both banks have narrow buffer strips. "` S �� _* "fir
The creek then takes a sweeping left curve before making `� 4 $ ,y
two 90-degree right bends against the Jones Creek Road Valley wall erosion near road on Jones Creek
embankment. Historic road and tributary alignments on old
quad maps indicate this area has been changed over time, and that prior to 1946, UT3 followed a more
perpendicular route to the creek.This is relevant, because in the sweeping bend,Jones Creek becomes
unconfined and is exhibiting signs of aggradation. Erosion in the bends is moderate to severe. Below
these bends, only the right bank is within the project Site. It has a narrow strip of trees adjacent to the
pasture. Runoff from heavy use areas near the barn in this reach appear to follow defined flow paths to
the creek.The lack of adequate left stream buffer allows for unfiltered runoff, nutrients and bacteria to
flow directly into the creek. At the bottom of the reach, the creek flows along the property line to the
confluence of UT3.
UT3 Reach 1
Within the project area, UT3 Reach 1 is accessible to ( �
livestock. UT3C and UT3B enter on the left side of UT3. UT3 �ry � "ef �t r• I
•
rapidly becomes incised and lateral bank erosion is present f +,
upstream of an existing culvert crossing. Downstream of the Y' :c I
culvert, bank height ratios exceed 3 and this segment of the £:'
reach has not widened in most locations due to the presence 9
of large trees on either bank.The majority of the trees are s -
•
undermined and there is a high risk of bank failures and
significant sediment load contribution. In most of this UT3 channel incision and trees holding
segment of the reach, only a narrow row of trees forms the banks together
buffer and there is pasture beyond on both banks. There is a
noticeable crenulation in the valley to the right of the existing
stream location where the stream could be effectively 1r• ,, .,
relocated and raised to its original base level. '
Below its confluence with UT3B, UT3 enters the flatter portion >` " ;
of the valley and the stream is less incised, but still has -' � ' l} '
estimated BHRs of 2-3, and has lateral erosion affecting over
half of the reach. A narrow row of woody vegetation is ,ba :'
-
present along about half of the reach.There are water quality
impacts from multiple livestock crossings throughout this
portion of UT3B. Multiflora rose is common and locally dense. UT3 Reach 1 below UT3B confluence
Cornbread Valley Mitigation Site-PART G
Wildlands Engineering, Inc. Page G.7

UT3 Reach 2
UT3 Reach 2 immediately below UT1A
Below the confluence with UT3A, UT3 Reach 2 begins as a
narrow and incised channel with bank height ratios `^
•
exceeding 2-3.The banks are lined with alders and this has
prevented widening in most locations. Beyond the alders,
,
there is minimal or no additional buffer.Toe erosion is
prevalent throughout the upper half of Reach 2. In the lower
half of Reach 2, the channel is wider with less erosion.A l -f `
manmade levy has been built up along the left bank of this :• ` ;-
portion of the reach.
UT3A
UT3A originates within the Site at a series of small springs in
a wooded area with pasture above and below.There is no •YY �r 4'�`'
fencing around UT3A and there is surface erosion from ' !
livestock trails immediately above the springs. In the upper E- ti ;.
third of UT3A, there is lateral erosion and vertical instability.
Bank height ratios vary but are typically 2-3 or greater. •
Evidence of prior manipulation coupled with livestock access
and poor buffer quality all contribute to this instability. UT3A
a , ,;
exits the wooded area into pasture with intermittent bank
trees, primarily alders, present both on the banks and within
the channel. As it enters the pasture, UT3A has floodplain Wallowed and overly-wide section of UT3A
wetlands on either side of the creek.The stream is no longer
incised, and is instead aggrading from a combination ofs r a k:
upstream sediment supply and livestock access, resulting in a
an overly-wide and grass-choked streambed. r i 4 �
UT3B •
UT3B begins at a spring box within the Site. Above the spring
box,there are steep diches with multiple knickpoints and 3 .
there is evidence of surface erosion as well as impacts from
livestock access. All of UT3B is accessible by livestock. UT3B
flows through a wooded valley that is at a lower level than One of several locations where UT3B flows
the adjacent pastures. Overall, the upper half of reach of against the valley wall
UT3B is predominantly stable. In the lower half of the reach,
the stream pushes into the valley wall and is subject to
impacts of livestock use or prior manipulation.There are some headcuts ranging from stable to
potentially active that include subsurface flow under tree roots, and some locally incised channel
segments.
UT3C
UT3C is a step-pool stream that flows through a culvert onto the property and then through a powerline
easement before entering a short wooded section.The powerline easement is also a natural cattle
crossing. Below the wooded section, the left bank continues as a steep wooded slope, but the right bank
is predominantly pasture with intermittent bank trees.There is minor erosion in the reach resulting
from cattle access and the lack of buffering on the right bank.
Beginning halfway down the reach,the stream becomes aligned tight against the left valley wall and
loses its flood relief benching. Continuing through the lower half of the reach it is confined within an
Cornbread Valley Mitigation Site-PART G
Wildlands Engineering, Inc. Page G.8

incised channel that has bank height ratios in the 2-3 range, and entrenchment ratios that are at or
below 1.4. Livestock have access to UT3C throughout its length. Bank erosion and erosion into the valley
wall are present in this lower reach and there is limited buffer width.
;4,'
\\' t Y `- :$ t :. - i[�,4 �
s q�r""' �Y' g + � Y } j i .-. � .e �.qI Year f, , ,•0 i
# arlS €V d � • lei kN' k;1� rSA'" � � +F � ! ,
ff A.--z
- 1,3k. �' S
-,t M I �w
- 4e9 n , T �t r "`` a' �y I
rieli
`J,��. �. UT3C—lower half of reach
Near top of UT3C looking downstream impinging on valley wall
2.3 Existing Conditions—Watersheds
The Site is located within the Prentiss USGS 7.5-minute Quadrangle map as shown on Figure 3. Valleys
are generally v-shaped confined valleys in the headwater tributary valleys, transitioning to partially to
unconfined within the Jones Creek floodplain.Jones Creek has a valley slope of 1.5-2%.Tributary
reaches UT3B, UT3C, and the upper portions of UT3A and UT2 have typical slopes of 5-10%coming out
of their headwater valleys. UT3 has a slope of approximately 4%in Reach 1. UT3 Reach 2, UT1, and the
lower portions of UT3A and UT2 have slopes in the 2-4% range as they enter and flow within the Jones
Creek valley. Valleys are generally v-shaped in the headwaters, broadening to a wider concave shape
within the Jones Creek valley. Watershed drainage areas and land uses are provided in Table G.2. below
and depicted on the Figure 4.
Table G.2 Drainage Areas and Associated Land Use
NC DWR Stream
Reach Intermittent/ Watershed Watershed
Identification Land Use
Perennial Status Area(acres) Area(sq.mi.)Name
Form Scores
Jones 45.5 Perennial 3164 4.94 3%agricultural,95%forested,
Creek 2%developed
UT1 30.5 Perennial 23 0.036
41%forested, 17%developed,
42%agricultural
UT2 34 Perennial 22 0.034
61%forested,37%agricultural,
2%developed
83%forested, 17%agricultural,
UT3 45 Perennial 181 0.282 <1%developed
UT3A 35/28 Perennial/Intermittent 14 0.022
52%forested, 17%developed,
31%agricultural
UT3B 31.5 Perennial 6 0.010 59%forested,25%agricultural, 16%
shrub/scrub,<1%developed
UT3C 42.5 Perennial 54 0.085 97%forested,3%agricultural
2.4 Soils
The proposed project is mapped by the Web Soil Survey for Macon County.The primary project area
soils are described below in Table G.3. Figure 5 provides a soil map of the Site.
Cornbread Valley Mitigation Site-PART G
Wildlands Engineering, Inc. Page G.9

Table G.3 Project Soil Types and Descriptions
Soil Name Description
Dellwood gravelly fine sandy Dellwood gravelly fine sandy loam soils are found on floodplains.They are
loam shallow with gravel and sand subsoils and are moderately well drained.
Consists of 5%minor components, Nikwasi which is rated as hydric.
Evard consists of deep loamy well drained soils on slopes and interfluves.The
profile consists of 5"of gravelly loam,then clay to sandy loam down to 80".
Cowee consists of shallow loamy soil with underlying bedrock,and is
Evard-Cowee complex characterized as well drained soils occurring on mountaintop and side slope
landscape positions.The profile is 5"of gravelly sandy loam overlying sandy
clay loam to 27"and then bedrock.The series has 20%minor components.
Nikwasi fine sandy loam is found on floodplains and in depressions which
Nikwasi fine sandy loam floods frequently. It is very poorly drained with 10%of the mapped unit
consisting of undrained Nikwasi soils.The profile consists of a sandy loam or
fine sandy loam to 26"depth and then transitions to an extremely gravelly
coarse sand to a depth of 80".
Saunook gravelly loam consists of deep loamy well drained soils on
Saunook gravelly loam drainageways,alluvial fans and coves.The profile consists of a 10"of gravelly
loam,then clay loam from 10 to 35",and cobbly fine sandy loam below to
80". Saunook consists of 20%minor components.
Saunook loam consists of deep loamy well drained soils on drainageways,
alluvial fans and coves.The profile consists of a loam surface layer and
subsoils range progress from clay loam from 10"to 34"of depth and then to
Saunook loam cobbly sandy loam below that,to 80". Farmland of statewide importance.
Consists of 20%minor components,all associated with floodplain settings,
including Dellwood, Reddies,and Nikwasi—Nikwasi is rated as hydric.
Trimont gravelly loam is a deep gravelly and sandy loam to 80". It occurs on
Trimont gravelly loam mountain side slop positions.The typical profile is 9"of gravelly loam
overlying sandy clay loam to 45"and fine sandy loam to 80". It is well drained.
Source:Soil Survey of Macon County,North Carolina, USDA-NRCS,
https://www.n res.usda.gov/wps/porta I/n res/surveylist/soi Is/survey/state/?statel d=NC
2.5 Geology
According to the NC Geologic Survey, the Site is located in the Blue Ridge Belt of the Blue Ridge
physiographic province.The Blue Ridge Belt contains a combination of igneous, sedimentary, and
metamorphic rocks that have been repeatedly heated and deformed through such processes as folding,
faulting, and fracturing.The site is mapped as amphibolite with intrusive and extrusive mafic rock and
may include meta-sedimentary rocks. Shallow bedrock was not noted at the Site.The unit is described
as primarily equigranular, massive to well foliated, interlayered, and rarely discordant. According to the
Geologic Map of North Carolina (1985), the underlying geology of the proposed restoration Site is
mapped as Middle-Late Proterozoic age (roughly 900 million years in age) amphibolite (ZYba).
Source: North Carolina Geological Survey(NCGS),2016.Mineral Resources.http://deq.nc.gov/about/divisions/energy-mineral-
land-resources/north-carolina-geological-survey/ncgs-maps/1985-geologic-map-of-nc,North Carolina Geological Survey
(NCGS), 1985.Geologic map of North Carolina 1:500,000 scale.
2.6 Cultural Resources and Significant Natural Heritage Areas
There is one entry in the State Historic Preservation Office's National Register in the vicinity of the Site,
but none located on the Site parcels or are expected to be impacted by Site activities.The closest
National Register site includes the Dr. Alexander C. Brabson House (site ID MA0007).The archaeological
Cornbread Valley Mitigation Site-PART G
Wildlands Engineering, Inc. Page G.10

site files at the North Carolina Office of State Archaeology(OSA) have not been reviewed at this time. All
appropriate cultural resource agencies will be contacted for their review and comment prior to any land
disturbing activity.
The NC Natural Heritage Program (NHP) Managed Areas reference the Nantahala National Forest,
Needmore Game Land Dedicated Nature Preserve, two Mainspring Conservation Trust Easements, and
one NC Clean Water Management Trust Fund near the Site. Also,the Cartoogechaye Creek Aquatic
Habitat, Little Tennessee River Aquatic Habitat, Appalachian trail, Slagle Farm NC Clean Water
Management Trust fund Project, and seven other Significant Natural Heritage areas are within five miles
of the Site (Figure 1).
2.7 Threatened and Endangered Species
Wildlands searched the US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) and NHP databases for federally protected
plant and animal species in Macon County, NC. Currently the northern long-eared bat, bog turtle, spotfin
chub, noonday globe, Virginia spiraea, swamp pink, and small whorled pogonia plant are federally listed
as threatened.The Appalachian elktoe, littlewing pearlymussel, rusty-patched bumble Bee, mountain
sweet pitcher plant, and rock gnome lichen, are federally listed as endangered.The bald eagle is also
protected under the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act. Pedestrian surveys conducted on March 11,
2020, indicated possible summer roosting habitat for the northern long-eared bat, although no
individuals were seen. Possible habitat was located onsite for the bog turtle, virginia spiraea,
Appalachian elktoe, and littlewing pearlymussel; no individuals of these species were found during the
survey. No suitable habitat is present onsite for the bald eagle, swamp pink, small whorled pogonia,
spotfin chub, rusty-patched bumble bee, mountain sweet pitcher plant, or rock gnome lichen. Species
latin names are provided in the table below. Wildlands will conduct a full review of the Site for
protected species upon award of contract and will coordinate with USFWS and NCWRC as necessary
based on that review.
Cornbread Valley Mitigation Site-PART G
kieP
Wildlands Engineering, Inc. Page G.11

Table G.4 Federally Protected Species in Macon County,NC
Species Federal Status Habitat
Vertebrate
Northern Long-Eared Bat Roost in 3"dbh dead and alive trees with exfoliating bark,crevices or
(Myotis septentrionalis) Threatened hollows during summer months.Caves or mines during winter months.
Bald Eagle(Haliaeetus Bald and Habitat includes estuaries, large lakes, reservoirs, rivers,and some
leucocephalus) Golden Eagle seacoasts. In winter,the birds congregate near open water in tall trees
Protection Act for spotting prey and night roosts for sheltering.
Bog Turtle(Glyptemys Threatened
muhlenbergii) (S/A) Bogs,wet pastures,and wet thickets.
Little Tennessee River;formerly in French Broad drainage.Spotfin
Spotfin Chub (Erimonax chubs inhabit clear water over gravel, boulders,and bedrock in large
Threatened
monachus) creeks and medium-sized rivers having moderate current.This fish is
rarely seen over sand,and appears to avoid silty areas.
Invertebrates
Tennessee drainages.The species has been reported from relatively
shallow, medium-sized creeks and rivers with cool,clean,well-
oxygenated, moderate-to fast-flowing water.The species is most often
found in riffles, runs,and shallow flowing pools with stable,relatively
Appalachian Elktoe silt-free, coarse sand and gravel substrate associated with cobble,
(Alasmidonta raveneliana) Endangered boulders,and/or bedrock.Stability of the substrate appears to be
critical to the Appalachian elktoe,and the species is seldom found in
stream reaches with accumulations of silt or shifting sand,gravel,or
cobble. Individuals that have been encountered in these areas are
believed to have been scoured out of upstream areas during periods of
heavy rain,and have not been found on subsequent surveys.
Little Tennessee River;formerly in Valley River in Cherokee County. It
Littlewing Pearlymussel (Pegias inhabits cool,clear,and relatively high gradient streams(of small to
fabula) Endangered medium size)where it is sometimes found lying on a rocky stream bed
in shallow water. However, it is more often hidden under large rocks.
Noonday Globe(Patera clarki Threatened Nantahala Gorge(endemic to this site)
Nantahala)
Rusty-patched Bumble Bee Endangered Nests in abandoned mammal burrows,gathers nectar and pollen from
(Bombus affinis) a variety of flowering plants found in or near woodlands.
Vascular Plant
Swamp Pink(Helonias bullata) Threatened Bogs
Small Whorled Pogonia (Isotria Threatened Forests,especially with white pine.
medeolodies)
Mountain Sweet Pitcher Plant
Endangered Bogs
(Sarracenia jonesii)
Virginia Spiraea (Spiraea Threatened Riverbanks
virginiana)
Non-Vascular Plants
Rock Gnome Lichen
(Gymnoderma lineare) Endangered High elevation rock outcrops and outcrops in humid gorges.
Source: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp0/reports/species-by-current-range-county?fips=37113
https://www.ncnhp.org/data/species-community-search
Cornbread Valley Mitigation Site-PART G
Wildlands Engineering, Inc. Page G.12

2.8 Floodplain Compliance
The Site is represented on the Macon County Flood Map 3700656200J. None of the project streams are
mapped with FEMA-regulated floodplains.The project will be designed to avoid hydrologic trespass on
adjacent properties.
2.9 Site Constraints and Access
Two external easement breaks are present at existing roads, and twelve internal easement breaks are
proposed to maintain landowner and livestock access to pastures, as well as to accommodate power
utility easements that will be minimized to the extent practicable through relocation. Each crossing is
proposed to be fenced and gated if needed for livestock exclusion. Crossings will be a combination of
fords for Jones Creek crossings and culverted structures in the case of all other tributary crossings.
Crossings will be designed with the restored stream bed profile to allow for aquatic organism passage.
The crossings are summarized and numbered below in Table G.5 and depicted on Figures 6a and 6b.
Livestock currently have access to all streams on the project. After restoration, the landowner may
remove livestock from all or a part of the property. Wildlands will provide fencing along the perimeter of
the easement of any sections of the property where livestock will be present.The landowner would be
required to install fencing if livestock are returned to the property in the future.
Table G.5 Easement Crossings
No. Width(ft) Location Internal or External Crossing Type
1 40 UT1 Internal Culvert Crossing
2 40 Unnamed tributary to UT1 Internal (Existing)Culvert Crossing
(not for credit)
3 30 Jones Creek Reach 1 mid Internal Overhead Utility Easement
reach
4 40 Jones Creek Reach 1 near Internal Overhead Utility Easement
bridge
5 60 Jones Creek Reach 1-2 at External Road ROW/Bridge
Allison Watts Rd
6 40 Jones Creek Reach 2 Internal Ford Crossing&Overhead Utility
Easement
7 40 UT2(Downstream) Internal Culvert Crossing&Overhead
Utility Easement
8 30 UT2/Jones Creek Reach 2 Internal Overhead Utility Easement
9 60 Jones Creek Reach 1-2 at N External Road ROW/Bridge
Jones Creek Rd
10 40 Jones Creek Reach 3 Internal Ford Crossing/Waterline
11 60 UT3C Internal Culvert Crossing&Overhead
Utility Easement
12 40 UT3 Reach 1(Upstream) Internal Culvert Crossing&Overhead
Utility Easement
13 40 UT3 Reach 1 Internal Culvert Crossing
(Downstream)
14 40 UT3 Reach 2 Internal Culvert Crossing
15 30 Jones Creek above Reach 1 Internal Overhead Utility Easement
(not for credit)
Cornbread Valley Mitigation Site-PART G
Wildlands Engineering, Inc. Page G.13

Existing overhead utility lines are being consolidated to the extent possible in order to minimize the
number of utility easements crossing the creek upon completion of the project. No other utilities apart
from those shown on Figures 6a and 6b are known to exist within the conservation easement.
The easement boundaries around all streams proposed for mitigation credit provide the required 30-
foot minimum riparian buffer for Mountain streams.The easement area will be marked per
requirements outlined in RFP 16-20190304.
The entire easement area can be accessed for construction, monitoring, and long-term stewardship
North Jones Creek Road and Allison Watts Road.There are no airports within five miles of the Site.
Macon County Airport and Angel Medical Center have facilities north of the Site outside of the five mile
radius.
3.0 Project Development—Functional Uplift Potential
The Wildlands Team proposes to restore a high quality of ecological function to streams and riparian
corridors on this Site. Floodplain wetlands will benefit from project activities.The project design will be
developed to avoid significant adverse impacts to existing streams,wetland resources, or mature
wooded vegetation. Management strategies for individual resources are tailored to their functional
uplift potential.These activities are discussed below and a summary of uplift is provided in Table G.7.
Figures 6a and 6b illustrates the conceptual design options for the Site.
3.1 Functional Uplift for Water Quality
Riparian buffers range from moderate to absent on Site streams, and often only one row or very narrow
strip of woody buffering is present.
Riparian Vegetation Agrassed filter strip or similar agricultural
Riparian vegetation is non-functioning (absent, narrow, one- BMP is proposed upstream of UT3A
sided and/or sparse)throughout the Site. Invasive species are
present. Planting riparian buffers on project stream corridors ks N
will not only improve terrestrial habitat but will contribute to ` * '" _
water quality improvements as well. Buffer widths will meet or R, } -
exceed the required 30 feet and it is estimated that
approximately 75% of the existing easement area will be -
converted from pasture to forest. Using the estimate of
livestock exclusion areas removing 51.04 lbs of total nitrogen
(TN) per acre per year(DMS 2016), and 4.23 lbs of total
phosphorus (TP) per acre per year, this project may reduce TN
by 776 lbs and TP by 64 lbs annually (based on 15.2 acres of new livestock exclusion). Wildlands has
scored non-functioning riparian buffer uplift as high.
Nutrients and Fecal Coliform
The entire Site is active livestock pasture. Wildlands is proposing BMPs in pastures and downslope of
cattle paths on UT3A and UT3B. Wildlands is also proposing activities not for direct credit: (1) additional
fencing, (2)Jones Creek Reach 3 bank repair, and (3) buffer acquisition to ensure that cattle are fenced
out of Site streams in the upper field (upstream of Allison Watts Road) and along UT3 upstream of the
project area. Wildlands is also proposing uncredited bank repair activities along the lower portion of
Jones Creek Reach 3 to reduce sediment and nutrient impacts from bank erosion; a minimum 30' buffer
is also being established in this area as an uncredited activity (the left bank is not within the project
area).
Cornbread Valley Mitigation Site-PART G
Wildlands Engineering, Inc. Page G.14

Converting that pastureland to forest may reduce the
total nitrogen (TN) contributed by the site by 776 pounds
per year and total phosphorus (TP) by 64 pounds per
GNP
year. Exclusion of livestock and land conversion may also .,, -. J
+-
reduce fecal coliform loading on site by approximately
8.94x1011 colonies annually. Calculations and variables u4
are shown in Table G.6 below. Wildlands has scored t `4k
nutrients functional uplift potential as very high and s
fecal coliform uplift potential as very high. _; '" "
Agricultural BMP
Table G.6 Water Quality Calculations
Estimated Nutrient and Fecal Coliform Reductions for Proposed Project
Input Variables
Acres of livestock exclusion 15.2
LB TN reduction/ac/year 51.04
LB TP reduction/ac/year 4.23
Animal Units(AU)= 1,000lb livestock 35
colonies/AU/day 2.2E+11
%input into streams 0.085
Q-Runoff(in) 2.07
P-Accumulated rainfall 2 year-24 hr(in) * 4.63
S-Potential Maximum retention 3.51
CN -Curve Number** 74
la -Initial Abstraction 0.70
hydrologic soil group B/D
pasture grazed for half of year(col/gal) 329500
runoff volume(gal) 8.56E+05
Nutrient reduction calculations
Total Nitrogen reduction(lb/year) 776
Total Phosphorus reduction(lb/year) 64
Fecal Coliform Direct Input(col) 6.545E+11
Fecal Coliform Reduction from buffer filtration (col) 2.4E+11
Total Fecal Coliform reduction(col) 8.94E+11
* Precipitation using NOAA Atlas 14,Volume 2,Version 3(accessed 3/14/2020),
https://hdsc.nws.noaa.gov
**Curve number assumes a fair condition and B/D soils for pasture
Sediment
A preliminary watershed analysis was performed to evaluate onsite and offsite sediment sources.
Currently, sediment loading in UT1, UT2, UT3A, and UT3B are largely dictated by onsite sources. Each of
these tributaries has their perennial and channel origins onsite. All onsite streams are impacted from
sediment loading from cattle trails, wallows and pastures. In addition, sediment sources to UT1 include
inputs from adjacent berms, channel erosion, and ditches. Berms will be removed as part of project
activities. Channel and ditch erosion will be addressed with grading and revegetation efforts. Sediment
Cornbread Valley Mitigation Site-PART G
Wildlands Engineering, Inc. Page G.15

sources in UT2 are a breached embankment that is actively eroding and impacting downstream habitat.
In addition, head-cutting and minor bank erosion are present in the upper half of UT2, as well as the
downstream limits near the road embankment. Sources will be addressed through stream restoration
and bank grading and revegetation in the upstream enhancement reach. UT3A, UT3B and UT3C receive
sediment from lateral bank erosion. Minor head-cutting is also present in UT3A and UT3C. In addition to
restoration and enhancement efforts, BMPs will be installed at the top of UT3A and UT3B to filter
agricultural runoff from adjacent pasture and cattle trails. Lateral erosion is moderate to severe on UT3.
Jones Creek, UT3 and UT3C may have upstream sources from unpaved roads, minor clearing for
residential construction or other purposes, and upstream channel erosion, but are also both largely
forested in their headwaters (94%, 83%and 97%, respectively). Based on site conditions, erosion due to
absence of riparian buffers and livestock access contribute the majority of sediment volume to these
systems.
Channels onsite show aggradation in areas where they have been manipulated or subject to cattle
wallowing. UT2 and UT3A have segments that are particularly aggradational.The combination of stream
restoration to eliminate significant in-channel sources, and a BMP on UT3A,will reduce sediment
delivery while at the same time enhancing capacity and competency in wallowed areas. Upon
completing project activities, it is anticipated that all Site stream channels will be able to sufficiently
transport existing sediment loads. Additionally, reconnection of channels with flood relief areas will
allow streams to use their floodprone areas for sediment storage. Following restoration of channel
banks and the exclusion of livestock from the channels, sediment supply will be limited to background
levels based on a high percentage of forested watershed conditions. Restoration activities proposed on
Jones Creek Reach 3 are intended to enhance sediment transport by increasing slope and decreasing
form roughness to transport loading from the watershed. Wildlands has scored sediment functional
uplift potential as very high.
Sources:
NCDMS.2016.Quantifying Benefits to Water Quality from Livestock Exclusion and Riparian Buffer Establishment for Stream
Restoration.
NOAA Atlas 14,Volume 2,Version 3
Schwab et al.1993.Soil and Water Conservation Engineering.NY,NY.John Wiley&Sons,Inc.
3.2 Functional Uplift for Hydrology , - , f
Currently, streams throughout the Site range from unincised
to severely incised.Those streams that are moderately to
severely incised (UT3 Reach 1, lower half of UT3C, upper half fi, • -
of UT3 Reach 2) are disconnected from flood relief benches
and floodplains during extreme events. Confining peak flows ,.;14-A5.. '. : ' I
within the channel has led to scour, incision, and mass
wasting of bank material. Restoration activities will be .`
tailored to restore this hydrologic connection between the '" ° " '` '`
stream and floodplain on incised reaches.The Incised reaches Perched undersized culvert on UT3 Reach 1
listed above will be restored using Priority 1 restoration or
enhancement involving Priority 1 techniques. Raising the stream beds will improve floodplain
connectivity, reducing the erosive effects of peak flows and decreasing the drainage effect on
surrounding wetlands.The existing channelized streams will be filled, though some vernal pools will be
established along the intersection of existing channel and areas of concentrated overland flow (such as
existing along UT1 Reach 1). Vernal pools provide longer-term storage of runoff, as well as habitat
variety. Wildlands has scored control of peak flows functional uplift potential as moderate due to the
Cornbread Valley Mitigation Site-PART G
Wildlands Engineering, Inc. Page G.16

fact that streams are partially confined and have limited floodprone areas to provide significant function
uplift.
In-stream barriers within the project include a breached dam on UT2 as well as three culverts on UT1,
UT2, and UT3.The breached dam is a barrier to stream flow and alters hydrology and hydraulics in UT2.
Culverts are generally undersized and do not accommodate bankfull channel widths. Visual assessment
and comparison to similar size streams suggest that they are an impediment to larger flows that
influence channel dynamics in step-pool channels. Overall, barriers are partially inhibiting in-stream
flows and natural hydrologic function and project activities will remove these barriers and upgrade
existing culverts on UT1, UT2, and UT3 to provide for enhanced hydrologic function. Wildlands has
scored the artificial barrier functional uplift potential as high.
3.3 Functional Uplift for Habitat 4 e• :
The three culverts and partially breached pond slated for .;
removal not only impact hydrologic connectivity, but also ; -r,
• ':fit r
fragment habitats. Culverts are small diameter and do not ;. '•
accommodate the bankfull channel width.The culvert on UT3
was found to be perched, restrictingaquatic movement in UT3 ' , "� •
p q • ti p-_ • "- f
Reach 1.The existing farm ponds is a silted lentic environment
that disconnects upstream and downstream habitat. Habitat is _ + Y � f� ''
"also fragmented by agricultural berms with steep slopes that
limit species movement between streams and floodplain Woody debris in restored stream channel
wetlands. Removing the breached dam, upgrading crossings
and removing agricultural berms will increase aquatic organism passage onsite and return longitudinal
connectivity to streams and lateral connectivity between streams and floodplains. In deeply incised
reaches, priority 1 restoration will also enhance connectivity. Proposed culvert crossings will
accommodate wider channel dimensions and be embedded below the stream grade to provide a natural
stream bottom. Wildlands has scored habitat fragmentation functional uplift potential as moderate.
Streams onsite have variable bedform diversity. Some streams, such as UT1, UT2, and UT3A are
smothered by livestock and/or sediment impacts from geomorphic impacts and loss of sediment
transport capacity.This has resulted in a lack of pools, riffles and microhabitat. A diverse bedform will be
created in streams slated for restoration and enhancement to provide habitat for an increased number
of species of insects, fish, and amphibians.The use of both wood and rock step structures, riffles and
bank revetments provides habitat for macroinvertebrates, catches debris for leaf packs, and creates
shelter for fish in undercut banks. Wildlands has scored limited bedform diversity functional uplift
potential as moderate.
Many of the reaches also lack functional buffers and corresponding large woody debris and leaf and
debris packs. Enhancement and restoration efforts will incorporate woody material to seed channels
with sources of carbon and to provide physical roughness to enhance retention of beneficial material.
Planting the riparian buffers with woody vegetation will provide future sources of large woody debris for
the streams. Wildlands has scored absence of large woody debris as moderate.
Table G.7 Functional Uplift Potential Summary Table
Functional Functional Uplift
Category Functional Stressor Potential TRA
Non-functioning riparian buffer/wetland vegetation High X
Water Sediment Very High X
Quality Nutrients Very High X
Fecal Coliform Very High X
Cornbread Valley Mitigation Site-PART G
Wildlands Engineering, Inc. Page G.17

Functional Functional Stressor Functional Uplift TRA
Category Potential
Hydrology Peak flows Moderate X
Artificial Barriers High X
Habitat Fragmentation Moderate X
Habitat Limited Bedform Diversity Moderate X
Absence of Large Woody Debris Moderate X
Source:https://ncdenr.maps.arcgis.com/apps/webappviewer/index.html?id=03e1c13e7f184a09a71ccdc7e25a5b91
4.0 Project Development—Design Approach
Wildlands will begin the project by identifying the best design approach to meet the stated project
objectives and implement the appropriate degree of intervention. A combination of analog, empirical,
and analytical design approaches will potentially be used. All project reaches will be designed to create
stable, functional stream channels and buffers.
4.1 Enhancement II
Multiple reaches on both Jones Creek and its tributaries are slated for Enhancement level II practices.
Most Enhancement II reaches are relatively stable geomorphically, but non-functional buffers and
ongoing livestock access to the streams and buffers threatens water quality, habitat quality and in some
cases stream stability. All Enhancement II reaches will include livestock exclusion through removal of
livestock from the Site or the installation of fencing. Enhancement II reaches may also include the
following practices: removal of agricultural berms, minor bank grading or intermittent structures to
address erosion and habitat issues (notably a lack of pool habitat), physical dispersal of pasture runoff
within the buffer to the extent possible, or stabilization and revegetation of existing ditches entering the
easement. It is anticipated that restored buffers, stabilization, and revegetation of ditches as linear
swales will have significant water quality benefits.The table below summarizes the applicability of
various Enhancement II measures by project stream:
Table G.8 Enhancement II Approaches by Project Site Stream
> to
i N i :1-'« C
O oA ? . « -cam -a
N N N U U fC
U
rO I
fC -a .ymd fl. W 111111
d a \ > HOA d i NCOA it �+ (C
fc
wm i Stream h
Jones Creek Reach 1 X X X X X
UT1 X X X X X X
Jones Creek Reach 2 X X X
UT2 X X X
Jones Creek Reach 3 X X X X
UT3 Reach 2(lower portion) X X X X X
UT3A X X X X X
UT3B X X X X
UT3C X X X
Cornbread Valley Mitigation Site-PART G
Wildlands Engineering, Inc. Page G.18

4.2 Enhancement I
UT3 Reach 1 below the restoration reach, the upper portion of UT3 Reach 2, UT3A, UT3B, and UT3C
have reaches proposed for Enhancement level I practices.These are receiving the same treatment as
adjacent segments of the same streams as specified in Table G.8, but on top of those need additional
intervention to address more significant bank erosion, vertical instability and alignment concerns.These
issues that are present are typically the result of historic channel manipulation, relocation, head-cutting,
or a combination thereof, exacerbated by livestock access and riparian buffer degradation. UT3 Reach 1
will receive extensive bank grading, along with profile adjustments to treat bank erosion throughout the
reach. UT3B requires similar treatment, and minor realignment to move the channel away from the
valley wall. UT3C, likewise, must be moved away from the valley wall in some locations, and required
extensive bank grading in the lower half of the reach. Enhancement I methods will include segments of
priority 1 channel raising to take advantage of existing knick points, or raise grades to match proposed
downstream restoration reaches. Overall, methods will vary from extensive bank grading to adjustments
of pattern and dimension or dimension and profile.
In-stream log structures
4.3 Restoration
Portions of Jones Creek Reach 1, UT2,Jones Creek Reach 3 t
and UT3 Reach 1 are proposed for restoration. Livestock will " ' � �9=- 4,,
be excluded from all restoration reaches. For restoration ,
reaches, dimension and profile will be designed to allow for
access to flood relief benching, to provide stable bank
slopes, entrenchment ratios and vertical energy dissipation
consistent with semi-confined and confined step-pool ,<.
channels, and enable biological lift. Pattern will be adjusted ,
where appropriate to mimic reference reach pattern in step- ,- •
pool channels. Reference streams will be identified and will
serve as one of the primary sources of information on which restoration designs are based. Modeling
and other detailed analyses will be used as appropriate to develop or verify designs. Wildlands has
developed a general approach to be used as the basis for stream restoration design.The design
approach, which is tailored to each site, continues to develop as additional projects are implemented.
Some of the key elements of the methods are described below.
Generally, stream designs will be based on a design discharge range that, in most cases, will
approximate the bankfull discharge but will be selected to meet the objectives of the design.The
discharge will be determined through detailed hydrologic analyses using the best available information
such as local or regional stream gage records, empirical regional stream flow estimates, hydrologic
modeling results, and reference stream flows. Other discharges (such as baseflow or flows to support
instream habitat features)will also be considered during the design process based on the specific
project objectives. For Jones Creek,Wildlands anticipates using sediment transport modeling to
evaluate continuity of transport capacity, as well as competency.This modeling will help guide the
restoration of Jones Creek Reach 3.
4.4 Vegetation Plan and Conservation Easement Establishment
In some cases, restoration of riparian buffers will connect to existing forested areas upstream of the
Site. Native riparian buffers a minimum of 30 feet from the proposed top of bank will be planted along
restored and enhanced stream reaches.
Cornbread Valley Mitigation Site-PART G
Wildlands Engineering, Inc. Page G.19

The Site will be planted following construction of the project.
The planting plan will be based on an appropriate nearby " t;
reference community and past project experience.The plan
will be developed to restore appropriate strata (canopy,
understory, shrub, and herbaceous layers).
The canopy will be restored through planting of bare root
trees.The understory and shrub layers will be restored
through a combination of planting bare root, low growth
species and installing live stake shrub species.The
herbaceous layer will be restored by seeding the disturbed Planted riparian buffer
area with a native seed mix with an emphasis placed on
creating good soil contact to encourage germination.
The conservation easement areas will be marked per DMS guidelines.
4.5 Description of Stream Crossings
Stream crossings will be a combination of fords on Jones 14. c: •"
Creek Reaches 2 and 3, and culverts on smaller streams. For p
culverts, the design approach will be to embed culverts
below grade to allow for simulation of a natural bed, and to ""-
target bankfull width dimensions or wider through the / T
culvert to facilitate aquatic passage. T ; .,
r.
4.6 Description of Other Uncredited Activities
There are several streams that come onto the Site within Stream crossing with bankfull width
NCDOT right-of-way—fences are in place to prevent direct opening
access by livestock. Similarly, above UT2 and UT3 Reach 1,
existing fencing prevents livestock access to streams.All fencing will be mapped and assessed—fencing
that is necessary for cattle exclusion that is missing or in disrepair will be replaced as part of the project.
Jones Creek Reaches 1 and an unnamed tributary along Allison Watts Road run with the parcel boundary
at the top of the project area. Easements are proposed along existing fence lines in the upper field to
protect these streams from livestock access.
On Jones Creek Reach 3 at the bottom of the project site only the right bank is within the project Site
parcel. Bank erosion on the right bank will be addressed with structure placement and/or grading.The
right bank will have a 30-foot buffer to exclude cattle and filter pasture runoff.
BMPs will be placed at the top of UT3A and UT3B. At the top of UT3A, a vegetated filter strip will slow
and treat pasture runoff above the jurisdictional start of the stream.At the top of UT3B, a combination
of planting and physical stabilization through grade control, berms, and/or other surface protection will
be implemented to address surface erosion and upslope livestock trails.
5.0 Proposed Mitigation
The Site will be a combination of stream restoration, enhancement level I, and enhancement level II
stream credits.Two options are proposed: Option 1 includes 4,520 cold stream credits (Table G.9a), and
Option 2 includes 3,634 cold stream credits (Table G.9b). Both options provide the same treatment of
Site streams but differ in that Option 2 does not include the upper field above Allison Watts Road
(Option 2 does not include Jones Creek Reach 1 or UT1). Figures 6a and 6b represent the management
objectives proposed for both options.
Cornbread Valley Mitigation Site-PART G
Wildlands Engineering, Inc. Page G.20

The mitigation credit calculation was derived using the US Army Corps of Engineers' Stream Mitigation
Guidance and was based on Wildlands' conceptual design for maximum ecological uplift. Given the
existing conditions of the stream channels,the disturbance factors, and the constraints, management
objectives for each reach have been established.The management objective, the mitigation type, and
proposed amount of mitigation is presented in the below Tables G.9a and G.9b.
Table G.9a Mitigation Credits Proposed—Cornbread Valley Mitigation Site—OPTION 1
Stream Credits
Type of Length Stream
Reach Management Objectives Mitigation (feet)1 z Ratio Credits
RESTORATION
Jones Creek Reach 1 Restore appropriate dimension, pattern,and 352 1:1 352
Jones Creek Reach 3 profile with Priority 1 restoration. Install habitat 342 1:1 342
UT2 structures,allow bankfull floodplain access. Restoration 848 1:1 848
Establish native riparian buffer and exclude
UT3 Reach 1 livestock. 612 1:1 612
Restoration Subtotal 2,154 2,154
ENHANCEMENT I
UT3 Reach 1 273 1.5:1 182
UT3 Reach 2 Semi-continuous bank and/or channel grading to 207 1.5:1 138
address erosion and headcuts. Establish native
UT3A Enhancement I 160 1.5:1 107
riparian buffer where needed and exclude
UT3B livestock. 283 1.5:1 189
UT3C 214 1.5:1 143
Enhancement I Subtotal 1,137 759
ENHANCEMENT II
Jones Creek Reach 1 341 2.5:1 136
UT1 996 2.5:1 398
Jones Creek Reach 2 793 2.5:1 317
UT2 Spot bank erosion repair.Spot structures for 161 2.5:1 64
UT3 Reach 2 stability or habitat. Establish native riparian Enhancement II 289 2.5:1 116
UT3A buffer where needed and exclude livestock. 339 2.5:1 136
UT3B 140 2.5:1 56
UT3C 216 2.5:1 86
Jones Creek Reach 3 746 2.5:1 298
Enhancement II Subtotal 4,021 1,607
TOTAL: 7,312 4,520
Note 1: Length is approximate based on best professional judgement of channel size and sinuosity.
Note 2:Length excludes proposed easement crossings.
Table G.9b Mitigation Credits Proposed—Cornbread Valley Mitigation Site—OPTION 2
Stream Credits
Type of Length Stream
Reach Management Objectives Mitigation (feet)1 z Ratio Credits
RESTORATION
Jones Creek Reach 3 Restore appropriate dimension, pattern,and 342 1:1 342
UT2 profile with Priority 1 restoration. Install habitat 848 1:1 888
structures,allow bankfull floodplain access. Restoration
UT3 Reach 1 Establish native riparian buffer and exclude 612 1:1 612
livestock.
Restoration Subtotal 1,802 1,802
Cornbread Valley Mitigation Site-PART G
Wildlands Engineering, Inc. Page G.21

Stream Credits
Type of Length Stream
Reach Management Objectives Mitigation (feet)1-2 Ratio Credits
ENHANCEMENT I
UT3 Reach 1 273 1.5:1 182
UT3 Reach 2 Semi-continuous bank and/or channel grading to 207 1.5:1 138
address erosion and knick points. Establish native Enhancement I
UT3A riparian buffer where needed and exclude 160 1.5:1 107
UT3B livestock. 283 1.5:1 189
UT3C 214 1.5:1 143
Enhancement I Subtotal 1,137 759
ENHANCEMENT II
Jones Creek Reach 2 793 2.5:1 317
UT2 161 2.5:1 64
UT3 Reach 2 Spot bank erosion repair.Spot structures for 289 2.5:1 116
UT3A stability or habitat. Establish native riparian Enhancement II 339 2.5:1 136
UT3B buffer where needed and exclude livestock. 140 2.5:1 56
UT3C 216 2.5:1 86
Jones Creek Reach 3 746 2.5:1 298
Enhancement II Subtotal 2,684 1,073
TOTAL: 5,623 3,634
Note 1: Length is approximate based on best professional judgement of channel size and sinuosity.
Note 2:Length excludes proposed easement crossing.
6.0 Current Ownership and Long-Term Protection
The Site is located on two parcels owned by Mrs. WM-Bill Byrd (Rita Byrd) and Steven David Byrd.
Option agreements for the project areas shown on Figures 6a and 6b have been signed by the property
owners and the Memoranda of Option are recorded at the Macon County Register of Deeds. The option
agreement allows Wildlands to purchase a conservation easement on the property.The Memorandum
of Option is valid for a minimum of 6 months from the closing date of RFP 16-20190304. Wildlands will
convey the conservation easement to the State to provide long term protection of the Site.The
conservation easement agreement will ensure the right of entry abilities of Wildlands, its contractors,
and the future easement holder in any future land transactions. A copy of the Memoranda of Option are
included in the appendix.The landowner, parcel identification numbers, and deed book and page
numbers for the Memoranda of Option are summarized in Table G.10.
Table G.10 Property Ownership
Property Owner Parcel ID Number Memorandum of Option Deed Book(DB)and Page(PG)Numbers
Mrs.WM-Bill Byrd 6562715245 DB:CRP U-39
(Rita Byrd) PG: 1059-1062
Steven David Byrd 6562725090 DB: CRP U-39
PG: 1063-1066
7.0 Scope of Work and Project Phasing
Table G.11 describes the tasks and deliverables required by the Scope of Work outlined in RFP 16-
20190304.Table G.12 provides the proposed schedule for accomplishing each Scope of Work task.The
Wildlands Team has experience handling tightly scheduled projects with a number of stakeholders. We
understand the importance of clear communication and adherence to deadlines. We will establish
Cornbread Valley Mitigation Site-PART G
Wildlands Engineering, Inc. Page G.22

additional internal deadlines to keep the project milestones on track. Each task will be staffed with the
appropriate technical and management staff to ensure quality and timely completion.
Table G.11 Summary Scope of Work
Task# Task Name Task Summary DMS Deliverable
• Onsite meeting with the IRT and DMS
to discuss concepts of the mitigation
plan and obtain concurrence on
planned work and crediting. • Approved Categorical Exclusion
• Conduct DMS/FHWA guidelines for document-emailed Adobe PDF.
Environmental and environmental screening to identify • IRT meeting minutes—emailed Adobe
1 threatened/endangered species, PDF.
Project Screening environmental, and/or cultural issues • DMS Full Delivery Landowner
on the Site. Authorization Form (if applicable).
• Secure DMS Full Delivery Landowner • USACE Public Notice (if applicable).
Authorization Form (if applicable).
• Satisfy USACE public notification
process(if applicable).
• 4 preliminary review items outlined in
the RFP,submitted electronically as
defined in Attachment H.
• Create conservation easement • 4 final deliverables outlined in the
documents and plats.
2 Property • Close and record the conservation RFP,submitted electronically and in
hard copy as defined in Attachment H.
easement. • Installation of boundary marking
documented with As-Built survey
during Task 6.
• 2 hard copies and 1 electronic"Draft"
Mitigation Plan and survey.
• 3 hard copies and 1 electronic"Final
Mitigation Plan • Develop a site-specific mitigation plan, „
(Final Draft)and appropriate for the Site. Draft Mitigation Plan and survey.
3 Financial • Revise per DMS and IRT review • Performance Bond (may be retired
after completion of Task 6)
Assurance comments. • 2 Completed PCN forms and 2 hard
copies of the"Final" Mitigation Plan. 1
copy of both submitted electronically.
• Secure all necessary permits and/or • 1 electronic copy of approved permits
4 Permitting and certifications for Site construction. prior to beginning earthwork.
Earthwork • Written notification of earthwork
• Construct the Site. completion.
Mitigation Site
Planting and . Complete planting of Site. • Written notification of planting and
5 Installation of monitoring device installation
• Install monitoring devices.
Monitoring completion.
Devices
• Conduct baseline monitoring. • 1 hard copy and 1 electronic copy of
Baseline • Perform as-built survey. "Draft" Baseline Monitoring Document
Monitoring Report • Prepare baseline monitoring and As-Built drawings. Electronic
6 (Including As-Built
document. copies of surveys.
Drawings) • Prepare as-built survey drawings. • 1 hard copy and 1 electronic copy of
Approved by DMS
• Install easement markers and signage. "Final" Baseline Monitoring Document
Cornbread Valley Mitigation Site-PART G
Wildlands Engineering, Inc. Page G.23

Task# Task Name Task Summary DMS Deliverable
and As-Built drawings. Electronic
copies of surveys.
• Monitor the Site.
7 Monitoring Year 1 • Prepare the monitoring report.
• Monitor the Site.
8 Monitoring Year 2 • Prepare the monitoringreport. •
p p 1 hard copy and 1 electronic copy of
• Monitor the Site. each "Draft"annual monitoring report.
9 Monitoring Year 3 • Prepare the monitoring report. Electronic copy of survey.
• Monitor the Site. • 1 hard copy and 1 electronic copy of
10 Monitoring Year 4 • Prepare the monitoring report. each "Final"annual monitoring report.
• Monitor the Site. Electronic copy of survey.
11 Monitoring Year 5 • Prepare the monitoring report.
• Monitor the Site.
12 Monitoring Year 6 • Prepare the monitoring report.
• 1 hard copy and 1 electronic copy of
the"Draft"annual monitoring report
• Monitor the Site.
Monitoring Year 7 • Prepare the monitoring report. and closeout report. Electronic copy of
survey.
13 and Close-Out • Prepare closeout report. • 1 hard copy and 1 electronic copy of
Process • Attend closeout meetings and present
the"Final"annual monitoring report
final project to IRT. and closeout report. Electronic copy of
survey.
Table G.12 Project Schedule
Proposed Time to Proposed Completion
Project Milestone Completion Date(assuming NTP on
(from date of NTP) September 1,2020)
Task 1. Regulatory Site Visit& Environmental Screening 3 months December 1,2020
Task 2. Submit Recorded Conservation Easement on the Site 1 year,6 months March 1,2022
Task 3. Mitigation Plan Approved by DMS and Financial 1 year,6 months March 1,2022
Assurance
Task 4. Mitigation Site Earthwork Completed 2 years,5 months February 1,2023
Task 5. Mitigation Site Planting& Installation of Monitoring 2 years,7 months April 1,2023
Devices
Task 6. Baseline Monitoring Report(Including As-Built 2 years,9 months June 1,2023
Drawings)Approved by DMS
Task 7.Submit Monitoring Report#1 to DMS* 3 years,3 months December 1,2023
Task 8. Submit Monitoring Report#2 to DMS* 4 years,3 months December 1,2024
Task 9.Submit Monitoring Report#3 to DMS* 5 years,3 months December 1,2025
Task 10. Submit Monitoring Report#4 to DMS* 6 years,3 months December 1,2026
Task 11. Submit Monitoring Report#5 to DMS* 7 years,3 months December 1,2027
Task 12. Submit Monitoring Report#6 to DMS* 8 years,3 months December 1,2028
Task 13. Submit Monitoring Report#7 to DMS* and
complete Close Out Process 9 years,3 months December 1,2029
*Meets success criteria(schedule progression has been developed assuming that the Site meets success criteria each
monitoring year)
Cornbread Valley Mitigation Site-PART G
Wildlands Engineering, Inc. Page G.24

8.0 Performance Standards and Monitoring Plan
The performance criteria for the Site will follow approved performance criteria presented in the DMS
Stream and Wetland Mitigation Plan Template and Guidance (June 2017) and the October 2016 IRT
Mitigation Monitoring Guidance. Annual monitoring and semi-annual site visits will be conducted to
assess the condition of the completed project. Specific performance standard components are proposed
for stream morphology, hydrology, vegetation, and wetland hydrology (if applicable).The stream
restoration and enhancement I reaches of the project will be assigned specific performance criteria
components for hydrology,vegetation, and geomorphology.The enhancement II reaches will be
assigned specific performance criteria components for vegetation only. Performance criteria will be
evaluated throughout the (up to) seven years of post-construction monitoring. If all stream, vegetation,
and hydrologic performance criteria have been successfully met and at least four bankfull events have
occurred during separate years, Wildlands may propose to terminate stream and/or vegetation
monitoring after five years with written approval from the USACE and North Carolina Interagency
Review Team (IRT). An outline of the performance criteria components follows.
8.1 Stream Morphological Parameters and Channel Stability
Dimension
Riffle cross sections on the restoration reaches should be stable and should show little change in
bankfull area, bank height ratio, and width-to-depth ratio. Riffle cross sections should fall within the
parameters defined for channels of the appropriate stream type. If any changes do occur,these changes
will be evaluated to assess whether the stream channel is showing signs of instability. Changes in the
channel that indicate a movement toward stability or enhanced habitat include a decrease in the width-
to-depth ratio in meandering channels or an increase in pool depth. Remedial action would not be taken
if channel changes indicate a movement toward stability.
In order to assess channel dimension performance, permanent
cross sections will be installed on restoration and reaches per the
IRT Mitigation Monitoring Guidelines (October 2016). Each cross
section will be permanently marked with pins to establish its r• -; �, ,�° { '�
location. Cross section surveys will include points measured at all ',__
breaks in slope, including top of bank, bankfull, edge of water, . ;.
and thalweg. Cross section and bank pin surveys (if applicable) ;, . :. .5-;ya :. •
" :=
will be conducted in monitoring years one, two, three, five, and ,,v; f ' : " ..
seven.
Profile and Pattern A`� '" ''
Example of a cross section survey
Longitudinal profile surveys will be conducted during the as-built
survey but will not be conducted during the seven-year
monitoring period unless other indicators during the annual monitoring indicate a trend toward vertical
and lateral instability. If a longitudinal profile is deemed necessary, monitoring will follow standards as
described in the Stream Channel Reference Sites: An Illustrated Guide to Field Technique(Harrelson et.
al., 1994)for the necessary reaches.
Substrate
Gravel bed system
Substrate materials in the restoration and enhancement I reaches should indicate a progression towards
or the maintenance of coarser materials in the riffle features and smaller particles in the pool features.
However, natural variations in pool and riffle substrate is expected as a result of sediment transport
processes in steeper sloped channels. A reach-wide pebble count will be performed in each restoration
and enhancement I reach in monitoring years one, two, three, five, and seven for classification
Cornbread Valley Mitigation Site-PART G
Wildlands Engineering, Inc. Page G.25

purposes. A wetted pebble count will be performed during the baseline survey at surveyed riffles to
characterize the pavement.
8.2 Hydrology
Stream
Four bankfull flow events, occurring in separate years, must be documented on the restoration reaches
within the seven-year monitoring period. Stream monitoring will continue until success criteria in the
form of four bankfull events in separate years have been documented. Bankfull events will be
documented using photographs and either a crest gage or a pressure transducer, as appropriate for Site
conditions.The selected measurement device will be installed in the stream within a surveyed riffle
cross section. Photographs will also be used to document the occurrence of debris lines and sediment
deposition.
Where restoration or enhancement activities are proposed for intermittent streams, monitoring gages
will be installed to track the frequency and duration of stream flow events. Continuous surface water
flow within the tributaries must be documented to occur every year for at least 30 consecutive days
during the seven-year monitoring period.This 30-day period of flow can occur at any point during the
year. Additional monitoring may be required if surface water flow cannot be documented due to
abnormally dry conditions.
8.3 Vegetation
The final vegetative success criteria will be the survival of 210 planted stems per acre in the riparian
corridors at the end of the required monitoring period (year seven).The interim measure of vegetative
success for the Site will be the survival of at least 320 native species stems per acre at the end of the
third monitoring year and at least 260 stems per acre at the end of the fifth year of monitoring. Also,
trees must average six feet in height at the end of the fifth monitoring year, and eight feet in height at
the end of the seventh monitoring year. If this performance standard is met by year five and stem
density is trending towards success (i.e.,vigor), and invasive species are not threatening ecological
success, monitoring of vegetation on the Site may be terminated with written approval by the USACE in
consultation with the IRT.The extent of invasive species coverage will also be monitored and controlled
as necessary throughout the required monitoring period.
Vegetation monitoring quadrants will be installed across the Site to measure the survival of the planted
trees.The number of monitoring quadrants required, and frequency of monitoring will be based on the
October 2016 IRT Mitigation Monitoring Guidance.Vegetation monitoring will occur in the summer and
will follow the CVS-EEP Protocol for Recording Vegetation (2008) or another DMS approved protocol.
8.4 Other Parameters
Photo Reference Stations
Photographs should illustrate the Site's vegetation and morphological stability on an annual basis. Cross
section photos should demonstrate no excessive erosion or degradation of the banks. Longitudinal
photos should indicate the absence of persistent mid-channel bars within the channel or vertical
incision. Grade control structures should remain stable. Deposition of sediment on the bank side of vane
arms is preferable. Maintenance of scour pools on the channel side of vane arms is expected.
Photographs will be taken once a year to visually document stability for seven years following
construction. Permanent markers will be established and located with GPS equipment, so that the same
locations and view directions on the Site are photographed each year. Photos will be used to monitor
restoration and enhancement areas, as well as vegetation plots.
Cornbread Valley Mitigation Site-PART G
Wildlands Engineering, Inc. Page G.26

Longitudinal reference photos will be established at regular intervals along the channel by taking a
photo looking upstream and downstream. Cross sectional photos will be taken of each permanent cross
section looking upstream and downstream. Reference photos will also be taken for each of the
vegetation plots. Representative digital photos of each permanent photo point, cross section, and
vegetation plot will be taken when the stream and vegetation assessments are conducted.The
photographer will make every effort to consistently maintain the same area in each photo over time.
Visual Assessments
Visual assessments should support the specific performance standards for each metric as described
above. Visual assessments will be performed along stream reaches on a semi-annual basis during the
seven-year monitoring period. Problem areas such as channel instability(e.g. lateral and/or vertical
instability, instream structure failure/instability and/or piping, headcuts), vegetation health (e.g. low
stem density,vegetation mortality, invasive species, or encroachment), beaver activity, or livestock
access will be noted. Areas of concern will be mapped and photographed and will be accompanied by a
written description in the annual report. Problem areas will be re-evaluated during each subsequent
visual assessment. Should remedial actions be required, a plan of action will be provided in the annual
monitoring report.
Benthic Macroinvertebrates
If required by DWR as part of the project's permitting process, benthic macroinvertebrate sampling will
be performed on the restored site. Any required sampling will be performed using DWR Standard
Operating Procedures for Benthic Macroinvertebrates (October 2012).
8.5 Reporting Performance Criteria
Using the DMS Baseline Monitoring Report Template (June 2017), a baseline monitoring document and
as-built record drawings of the project will be developed for the constructed Site.Annual monitoring
reports will be prepared in the fall of each year of monitoring and submitted to DMS.These reports will
be based on the DMS Annual Monitoring Template (June 2017) and Closeout Report Template (June
2017). Full monitoring reports will be submitted to DMS in monitoring years 1, 2, 3, 5, and 7.
Abbreviated monitoring reports will be submitted in monitoring years 4 and 6. Closeout monitoring
period will be seven years beyond completion of construction or until performance standards have been
met.
9.0 Quality Control
The Wildlands Team takes pride in the quality of services that we deliver to our clients. We strive to
exceed our clients' expectations.To maintain the highest level of quality,Wildlands has an established
Quality Assurance/Quality Control (QA/QC) protocol that every member of our staff follows.
At the beginning of a project,the necessary level of QA/QC is determined based on the size and
complexity of the project.At a minimum, the project manager and an assigned QA/QC manager will
function to control the quality of the project.The project manager provides day-to-day QA/QC and may
assign task leaders to provide task-specific quality control (QC) functions.The QA/QC manager is a
knowledgeable senior staff member who is not assigned to function in a lead capacity on other areas of
the project.This provides the QA/QC manager objective views of the quality of work.
Cornbread Valley Mitigation Site-PART G
Wildlands Engineering, Inc. Page G.27

Our QC program includes established procedures for processes
performed from project inception through implementation and11
monitoring of the project. For example, Wildlands has developed `.
standardized checklists and pre-defined procedures for activities
191
such as field surveys of stream cross-sections and profiles, pebble "Ww:""�°°"
counts, benthic surveys, bank stability assessments, naturalitagarl
A �.
channel design, permitting, contract document preparation, post- tea
RMI.MM E. 9a
construction baseline survey, and post construction monitoring. �,,"o„-„�
The checklists are largely based on the most current DMS
RpM MI].Ib""Iq 0..91 me•0.1.2.f
guidelines to ensure that all required information is included in the
correct format.Task leaders assigned for each activity train project
team members in the application of these procedures.The task 1..4
Rna.,mtFY uo �
leaders assist the project manager by providing day-to-day QC . c.0.01.
functions, such as establishing clear decisions and directions to ""M.Korn
""
team members in the field, checking the completeness and 'w
accuracy of checklists, constant supervision, and documentation ofa=Er,
d0.0.4 ern
all decisions, assumptions, and recommendations.The role of the ,.turn
�
project manager in QC is to monitor and maintain project schedule RooMQ
and budget, address any concerns the client may have, constantly P..,0R
• Y
assess company resources, and review all of the checklists.
• � �—
During the conceptual and preliminary design stages, the project
manager and the task leader will perform a review of the design data, plans, technical specifications,
and construction estimate for accuracy, correct approach, and general overall quality of the product and
compliance with DMS formats before submission to the client. Sediment sampling, groundwater gage
monitoring, and pressure transducer surface flow monitoring are frequently used during the design
phase to validate the design criteria and analytical models.The project manager will perform a similar
review at final design as will the QA/QC manager. During the construction phase,the project manager
and the construction task manager will regularly meet to provide updates and discuss any issues.The
goal of the QC process is to provide the highest quality product to our client by completing tasks
correctly the first time. By completing procedural processes once, Wildlands helps ensure that we
deliver the best products at a minimum cost to our clients.
QA is performed to confirm that the QC program is effectively practiced, and to provide feedback on
further developments needed in the QC program.The QA/QC manager leads the QA program; however,
the project manager, task leaders, and project team staff also play large roles. It is each person's
responsibility to notify the QA/QC manager whenever discrepancies and inefficiencies are found in the
set of procedural activities that make up the QC process.The objective of QA is the continual
improvement of the total delivery process to enhance quality, productivity, and customer satisfaction.
We are continually improving the QC process so that our latest products and services are better than the
previous ones.
9.1 Deliverables
The project schedule is established during the scoping phases of a project and it is the project manager's
responsibility to maintain the schedule. A work plan is developed at the outset of a project and shared
internally with team members so that milestone deadlines and work requirements are clearly outlined.
Review time is built into this internal schedule to ensure that adequate review takes place.
The QA form, which is maintained by the QA/QC manager, is established at the beginning of the project
and is maintained throughout the life of the project. Reviews of technical data, design parameters,
Cornbread Valley Mitigation Site-PART G
kiev
Wildlands Engineering, Inc. Page G.28

reports, plan sheets, hydraulic models, and supporting calculations are tracked on the form. Included on
this form are requirements that a professional staff member, who is not involved in the project on a
day-to-day basis, review the design calculations, hydraulic models, reports, plans, and all other types of
project deliverables. Conformance with DMS report templates and a final grammar/spelling/formatting
review are also integrated into the QA review process.
9.2 Construction
Wildlands team members are familiar with the policies, procedures, and practices necessary to
construct natural channel design and stream mitigation projects. Wildlands has provided construction
administration and observation services of over 83 miles of stream work and 459 acres of wetland work.
We believe that project implementation is the ultimate key to a successful project and, to achieve this, it
is extremely important to have our most experienced staff members involved on all construction
projects. Our team knows how to oversee construction so that the project is completed on time and in
compliance with all federal, state, and local permits. Several members of the proposed project team
have assisted with construction services for the DMS restoration sites, many of which have performed
successfully for multiple years.
Table G.13 Wildlands Team Member Construction Oversight Experiencecci
Y o
N U E
d
c
Project Details w •
Big Harris Creek Mitigation Site 25,836 stream credits; 9 BMPs x x
Henry Fork Mitigation Site 4,500 stream credits;4.0 wetland credits x
Shake Rag Mitigation Site 6,656 stream credits x
Western Stream Initiative Multiple projects totaling 15,000 LF x
Reedy Creek Design-Build
Stream Restoration Project 25,974 stream credits x
Lyle Creek Mitigation Site 5,571 stream credits; 7.0 wetland credits x
Owl's Den Mitigation Site 2,400 stream credits; 8.0 wetland credits x
Britton Creek Stream Stabilization 1,500 LF x
Cornbread Valley Mitigation Site-PART G
Wildlands Engineering, Inc. Page G.29

Proposal Number: 16-20190304 Vendor: Wildlands Engineering, Inc.
ATTACHMENT B: INSTRUCTIONS TO VENDORS
1. •READ, REVIEW AND COMPLY: It shall be the Vendor's responsibility to read this entire document, review all
enclosures and attachments, and any addenda thereto, and comply with all requirements specified herein,
regardless of whether appearing in these Instructions to Vendors or elsewhere in this RFP document.
2. LATE PROPOSALS: Late proposals, regardless of cause, will not be opened or considered, and will automatically
be disqualified from further consideration. It shall be the Vendor's sole responsibility to ensure the timely submission
of proposals.
3. ACCEPTANCE AND REJECTION: The State reserves the right to reject any and all proposals, to waive any
informality in proposals and, unless otherwise specified by the Vendor, to accept any item in the proposal.
4. BASIS FOR REJECTION: Pursuant to 01 NCAC 05B.0501, the State reserves the right to reject any and all offers,
in whole or in part, by deeming the offer unsatisfactory as to quality or quantity, delivery, price or service offered,
non-compliance with the requirements or intent of this solicitation, lack of competitiveness, error(s) in specifications
or indications that revision would be advantageous to the State,cancellation or other changes in the intended project
or any other determination that the proposed requirement is no longer needed, limitation or lack of available funds,
circumstances that prevent determination of the best offer, or any other determination that rejection would be in the
best interest of the State.
5. EXECUTION: Failure to execute page 1 of the RFP (Execution Page) in the designated space shall render the
proposal non-responsive, and it will be rejected.
6. ORDER OF PRECEDENCE: In cases of conflict between specific provisions in this solicitation or those in any
resulting contract documents, the order of precedence shall be (high to low) (1) any special terms and conditions
specific to this RFP, including any negotiated terms; (2) requirements and specifications and administration
provisions in Sections 4, 5 and 6 of this RFP; (3) North Carolina General Contract Terms and Conditions in
ATTACHMENT C: NORTH CAROLINA GENERAL CONTRACT TERMS AND CONDITIONS; (4) Instructions in
ATTACHMENT B: INSTRUCTIONS TO VENDORS; (5)ATTACHMENT A: PRICING, and(6)Vendor's proposal.
7. INFORMATION AND DESCRIPTIVE LITERATURE: Vendor shall furnish all information requested in the spaces
provided in this document. Further, if required elsewhere in this proposal, each Vendor shall submit with its proposal
any sketches, descriptive literature and/or complete specifications covering the products and Services offered.
Reference to literature submitted with a previous proposal or available elsewhere will not satisfy this provision.
Failure to comply with these requirements shall constitute sufficient cause to reject a proposal without further
consideration.
8. RECYCLING AND SOURCE REDUCTION: It is the policy of the State to encourage and promote the purchase of
products with recycled content to the extent economically practicable,and to purchase items which are reusable,
refillable, repairable, more durable and less toxic to the extent that the purchase or use is practicable and cost-
effective.We also encourage and promote using minimal packaging and the use of recycled/recyclable products in
the packaging of commodities purchased. However, no sacrifice in quality of packaging will be acceptable. The
Vendor remains responsible for providing packaging that will adequately protect the commodity and contain it for its
intended use. Vendors are strongly urged to bring to the attention of purchasers those products or packaging they
offer which have recycled content and that are recyclable.
9. CERTIFICATE TO TRANSACT BUSINESS IN NORTH CAROLINA: As a condition of contract award, each out-of-
State Vendor that is a corporation, limited-liability company or limited-liability partnership shall have received, and
shall maintain throughout the term of The Contract, a Certificate of Authority to Transact Business in North Carolina
from the North Carolina Secretary of State, as required by North Carolina law. A State contract requiring only an
isolated transaction completed within a period of six months, and not in the course of a number of repeated
transactions of like nature, shall not be considered as transacting business in North Carolina and shall not require a
Certificate of Authority to Transact Business.
10. SUSTAINABILITY: To support the sustainability efforts of the State of North Carolina we solicit your cooperation
in this effort. Pursuant to Executive Order 156 (1999), it is desirable that all print responses submitted meet the
Ver:4/22/19 Page 28 of 41

Proposal Number: 16-20190304 Vendor. Midlands Engineering, Inc.
following:
• All copies of the proposal are printed double sided.
• All submittals and copies are printed on recycled paper with a minimum post-consumer content of 30%.
■ Unless absolutely necessary, all proposals and copies should minimize or eliminate use of non-recyclable or
non-reusable materials such as plastic report covers, plastic dividers, vinyl sleeves, and GBC binding. Three-
ringed binders, glued materials, paper clips, and staples are acceptable.
• Materials should be submitted in a format which allows for easy removal, filing and/or recycling of paper and
binder materials. Use of oversized paper is strongly discouraged unless necessary for clarity or legibility.
11. HISTORICALLY UNDERUTILIZED BUSINESSES: The State is committed to retaining Vendors from diverse
backgrounds, and it invites and encourages participation in the procurement process by businesses owned by
minorities, women, disabled, disabled business enterprises and non-profit work centers for the blind and severely
disabled. In particular, the State encourages participation by Vendors certified by the State Office of Historically
Underutilized Businesses, as well as the use of HUB-certified vendors as subcontractors on State contracts.
12. RECIPROCAL PREFERENCE: G.S. 143-59 establishes a reciprocal preference requirement to discourage other
states from favoring their own resident Vendors by applying a percentage increase to the price of any proposal from
a North Carolina resident Vendor. To the extent another state does so, North Carolina applies the same percentage
increase to the proposal of a vendor resident in that state. Residency is determined by a Vendor's"Principal Place
of Business," defined as that principal place from which the overall trade or business of the Vendor is directed or
managed.
13. INELIGIBLE VENDORS: As provided in G.S. 147-86.59 and G.S. 147-86.82, the following companies are
ineligible to contract with the State of North Carolina or any political subdivision of the State: a) any company
identified as engaging in investment activities in Iran, as determined by appearing on the Final Divestment List
created by the State Treasurer pursuant to G.S. 147-86.58, and b) any company identified as engaged in a boycott
of Israel as determined by appearing on the List of restricted companies created by the State Treasurer pursuant
to G.S. 147-86.81. A contract with the State or any of its political subdivisions by any company identified in a)or b)
above shall be void ab initia.
14. CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION: To the extent permitted by applicable statutes and rules, the State will maintain
as confidential trade secrets in its proposal that the Vendor does not wish disclosed. As a condition to confidential
treatment, each page containing trade secret information shall be identified in boldface at the top and bottom as
"CONFIDENTIAL" by the Vendor, with specific trade secret information enclosed in boxes, marked in a distinctive
color or by similar indication. Cost information shall not be deemed confidential under any circumstances.
Regardless of what a Vendor may label as a trade secret,the determination whether it is or is not entitled to protection
will be determined in accordance with G.S. 132-1.2.Any material labeled as confidential constitutes a representation
by the Vendor that it has made a reasonable effort in good faith to determine that such material is, in fact, a trade
secret under G.S. 132-1.2.Vendors are urged and cautioned to limit the marking of information as a trade secret or
as confidential so far as is possible. If a legal action is brought to require the disclosure of any material so marked
as confidential, the State will notify Vendor of such action and allow Vendor to defend the confidential status of its
information.
15. PROTEST PROCEDURES: When a Vendor wishes to protest the award of The Contract awarded by the Division
of Purchase and Contract, or awarded by an agency in an awarded amount of at least $25,000, a Vendor shall
submit a written request addressed to the State Purchasing Officer at: Division of Purchase and Contract, 1305 Mail
Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1305. A protest request related to an award amount of less than$25,000 shall
be sent to the purchasing officer of the agency that issued the award. The protest request must be received in the
proper office within thirty (30) consecutive calendar days from the date of the Contract award. Protest letters shall
contain specific grounds and reasons for the protest, how the protesting party was harmed by the award made and
any documentation providing support for the protesting party's claims. Note: Contract award notices are sent only
to the Vendor actually awarded the Contract, and not to every person or firm responding to a solicitation. Proposal
status and Award notices are posted on the Internet at httos:llwww.ips.state.nc.uslipsl. All protests will be handled
pursuant to the North Carolina Administrative Code,01 NCAC 05B .1519.
16. MISCELLANEOUS: Any gender-specific pronouns used herein, whether masculine or feminine, shall be read and
Ver:4/22/19 Page 29 of 41

Proposal Number; 16-20190304 Vendor Wiidlands Engineering, Inc.
construed as gender neutral, and the singular of any word or phrase shall be read to include the plural and vice
versa.
17. COMMUNICATIONS BY VENDORS: In submitting its proposal, the Vendor agrees not to discuss or otherwise
reveal the contents of its proposal to any source, government or private, outside of the using or issuing agency until
after the award of the Contract or cancellation of this RFP. All Vendors are forbidden from having any
communications with the using or issuing agency,or any other representative of the State concerning the solicitation,
during the evaluation of the proposals (i.e., after the public opening of the proposals and before the award of the
Contract), unless the State directly contacts the Vendor(s) for purposes of seeking clarification or another reason
permitted by the solicitation. A Vendor shall not: (a) transmit to the issuing and/or using agency any information
commenting on the ability or qualifications of any other Vendor to provide the advertised good, equipment,
commodity; (b) identify defects, errors and/or omissions in any other Vendor's proposal and/or prices at any time
during the procurement process; and/or (c) engage in or attempt any other communication or conduct that could
influence the evaluation or award of a Contract related to this RFP. Failure to comply with this requirement shall
constitute sufficient justification to disqualify a Vendor from a Contract award. Only those communications with the
using agency or issuing agency authorized by this RFP are permitted.
18. TABULATIONS: Bid tabulations can be electronically retrieved at the Interactive Purchasing System (IPS),
https://www.ips.state.nc.us/ips/BidNumberSearch.aspx. Click on the IPS BIDS icon, click on Search for Bid, enter
the bid number, and then search. Tabulations will normally be available at this web site not later than one working
day after the bid opening. Lengthy or complex tabulations may be summarized,with other details not made available
on IPS, and requests for additional details or information concerning such tabulations cannot be honored.
19. VENDOR REGISTRATION AND SOLICITATION NOTIFICATION SYSTEM: The North Carolina electronic Vendor
Portal(eVP)allows Vendors to electronically register for free with the State to receive electronic notification of current
procurement opportunities for goods and Services of potential interests to them available on the Interactive
Purchasing System, as well as notifications of status changes to those solicitations. Online registration and other
purchasing information is available at the following website: https.//ncadmin.nc.govlabout-doa/divisions/purchase-
contract.
20. WITHDRAWAL OF PROPOSAL: Proposals submitted electronically may be withdrawn at any time prior to the
date for opening proposals identified on the cover page of this RFP (or such later date included in an Addendum to
the RFP). Proposals that have been delivered by hand, U.S. Postal Service, courier or other delivery service may
be withdrawn only in writing and if receipt is acknowledged by the office issuing the RFP prior to the time for opening
proposals identified on the cover page of this RFP(or such later date included in an Addendum to the RFP). Written
withdrawal requests shall be submitted on the Vendor's letterhead and signed by an official of the Vendor authorized
to make such request. Any withdrawal request made after the opening of proposals shall be allowed only for good
cause shown and in the sole discretion of the Division of Purchase and Contract.
21. INFORMAL COMMENTS: The State shall not be bound by informal explanations, instructions or information
given at any time by anyone on behalf of the State during the competitive process or after award. The State is
bound only by information provided in writing in this RFP and in formal Addenda issued through IPS.
22. COST FOR PROPOSAL PREPARATION: Any costs incurred by Vendor in preparing or submitting offers are the
Vendor's sole responsibility; the State of North Carolina will not reimburse any Vendor for any costs incurred or
associated with the preparation of proposals.
23. VENDOR'S REPRESENTATIVE: Each Vendor shall submit with its proposal the name, address, and telephone
number of the person(s)with authority to bind the firm and answer questions or provide clarification concerning the
firm's proposal.
24. INSPECTION AT VENDOR'S SITE: The State reserves the right to inspect, at a reasonable time, the equipment,
item, plant or other facilities of a prospective Vendor prior to Contract award, and during the Contract term as
necessary for the State's determination that such equipment, item, plant or other facilities conform with the
specifications/requirements and are adequate and suitable for the proper and effective performance of the Contract
Ver:4/22/19 Page 30 of 41

Proposal Number: 16-20190304 Vendor: Wildlands Engineering, Inc.
ATTACHMENT C: NORTH CAROLINA GENERAL CONTRACT TERMS & CONDITIONS
1. PERFORMANCE AND DEFAULT;
a) It is anticipated that the tasks and duties undertaken by- the-Vendor shall include services or-the- -
manufacturing, furnishing, or development of goods and other tangible features or components as
deliverables that are directly correlated and/or ancillary to the services performed. Except as provided
immediately below, and unless otherwise mutually agreed in writing prior to award,any service deliverables
or ancillary services provided by Vendor in performance of the contract shall remain property of the State.
During performance, Vendor may provide proprietary components as part of the service deliverables that
are identified in the solicitation response. Vendor grants the State a personal, permanent, non-transferable
license to use such proprietary components of the service deliverables and other functionalities,as provided
under this Agreement. Any technical and business information owned by Vendor or its suppliers or licensors
made accessible or furnished to the State shall be and remain the property of the Vendor or such other
party, respectively.Vendor agrees to perform its services under the contract in the same or similar manner
provided to comparable users. The State shall notify the Vendor of any defects or deficiencies in
performance of its services or failure of service deliverables to conform to the standards and specifications
provided in this solicitation. Vendor agrees to remedy defective performance or any nonconforming
deliverables upon timely notice provided by the State.
b) Vendor has a limited, non-exclusive license to access and use State Data provided to Vendor, but solely for
performing its obligations under this Agreement and in confidence as may be further provided herein.Vendor
or its suppliers shall at a minimum,and except as otherwise specified and agreed herein, provide assistance
to the State related to all services performed or deliverables procured hereunder during the State's normal
business hours. Vendor warrants that its support, customer service, and assistance will be performed in
accordance with generally accepted and applicable industry standards.
c) If, through any cause, Vendor shall fail to fulfill in a timely and proper manner the obligations under The
Contract,the State shall have the right to terminate The Contract by giving written notice to the Vendor and
specifying the effective date thereof In that event and subject to all other provisions of this contract, all
finished or unfinished deliverable items under this contract prepared by the Vendor shall, at the option of the
State, become its property, and the Vendor shall be entitled to receive compensation for units actually
produced, if any, in an amount determined by reducing the total amount due had the full number of Units
been produced pro rata, such that the ratio of the final compensation actually paid to the original total amount
due in accordance with Attachment A(as amended, if applicable) is equal to the ratio of the Units actually
generated to the total Units identified in Attachment A.
d) In the event of default by the Vendor, the State may procure the goods and services necessary to complete
performance hereunder from other sources and hold the Vendor responsible for any excess cost occasioned
thereby. In addition, in the event of default by the Vendor under The Contract, or upon the Vendor filing a
petition for bankruptcy or the entering of a judgment of bankruptcy by or against the Vendor, the State may
immediately cease doing business with the Vendor,immediately terminate The Contract for cause,and may
take action to debar the Vendor from doing future business with the State.
2. GOVERNMENTAL RESTRICTIONS: In the event any Governmental restrictions are imposed which necessitate
alteration of the goods, material, quality, workmanship or performance of the Services offered prior to acceptance,
it shall be the responsibility of the Vendor to notify the Contract Lead at once, in writing, indicating the specific
regulation which required such alterations.The State reserves the right to accept any such alterations, including any
price adjustments occasioned thereby, or to cancel the Contract.
3. AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS: Any and all payments to the Vendor shall be dependent upon and subject to the
availability of funds to the agency for the purpose set forth in The Contract.
4. TAXES:Any applicable taxes shall be invoiced as a separate item.
a) G.S. 143-59.1 bars the Secretary of Administration from entering into Contracts with Vendors if the Vendor
or its affiliates meet one of the conditions of G.S. 105-164.8(b) and refuses to collect use tax on sales of
tangible personal property to purchasers in North Carolina. Conditions under G.S. 105-164.8(b) include: (1)
Ver:4/22/19 Page 31 of 41

Proposal Number: 16-20190304 Vendor: Wildlands Engineering, Inc.
Maintenance of a retail establishment or office, (2) Presence of representatives in the State that solicit sales
or transact business on behalf of.the Vendor and (3) Systematic exploitation of the market by media-
assisted, media-facilitated, or media-solicited means. By execution of the.proposal document the Vendor
certifies that it and all of its affiliates, (if it has affiliates), collect(s)the appropriate taxes.
b) The agency(ies) participating in The Contract are exempt from Federal Taxes, such as excise and
transportation. Exemption forms submitted by the Vendor will be executed and returned by the using agency.
c) Prices offered are not to include many personal property taxes, nor any sales or use tax (or fees) unless
required by the North Carolina Department of Revenue.
5. SITUS AND GOVERNING LAWS:This Contract is made under and shall be governed and construed in accordance
with the laws of the State of North Carolina, without regard to its conflict of laws rules, and within which State all
matters, whether sounding in Contract or tort or otherwise, relating to its validity, construction, interpretation and
enforcement shall be determined.
6. PAYMENT TERMS: Payment terms are Net not later than 30 days after receipt of a correct invoice or acceptance
of goods, whichever is later. The using agency is responsible for all payments to the Vendor under the Contract.
Payment by some agencies may be made by procurement card, if the Vendor accepts that card(Visa, MasterCard,
etc.)from other customers, and it shall be accepted by the Vendor for payment under the same terms and conditions
as any other method of payment accepted by the Vendor. If payment is made by procurement card, then payment
may be processed immediately by the Vendor.
7. NON-DISCRIMINATION:
a. The Vendor will take necessary action to comply with all Federal and State requirements concerning fair
employment and employment of people with disabilities, and concerning the treatment of all employees
without regard to discrimination on the basis of any prohibited grounds as defined by Federal and State law.
b. The vendor will take necessary action to ensure its internal employee policies and procedures are consistent
with Executive Order #82 (Roy Cooper, December 6, 2018), which extends workplace protections and
accommodations to pregnant employees.
8. CONDITION AND PACKAGING: Unless otherwise provided by special terms and conditions or specifications, it is
understood and agreed that any item offered or shipped has not been sold or used for any purpose and shall be in
first class condition.All containers/packaging shall be suitable for handling, storage or shipment.
9. INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY WARRANTY AND INDEMNITY: Vendor shall hold and save the State, its officers,
agents and employees, harmless from liability of any kind, including costs and expenses,resulting from infringement
of the rights of any third party in any copyrighted material, patented or patent-pending invention, article, device or
appliance delivered in connection with The Contract.
a. Vendor warrants to the best of its knowledge that:
i. Performance under The Contract does not infringe upon any intellectual property rights of any
third party; and
ii. There are no actual or threatened actions arising from,or alleged under, any intellectual property
rights of any third party;
b. Should any deliverables supplied by Vendor become the subject of a claim of infringement of a patent,
copyright,trademark or a trade secret in the United States, the Vendor, shall at its option and expense,
either procure for the State the right to continue using the deliverables, or replace or modify the same to
become non-infringing. If neither of these options can reasonably be taken in Vendor's judgment, or if
further use shall be prevented by injunction, the Vendor agrees to cease provision of any affected
deliverables and refund any sums the State has paid Vendor and make every reasonable effort to assist
the State in procuring substitute deliverables. If, in the sole opinion of the State,the cessation of use by
the State of any such deliverables due to infringement issues makes the retention of other items acquired
from the Vendor under this Agreement impractical, the State shall then have the option of terminating the
Agreement, or applicable portions thereof,without penalty or termination charge;and Vendor agrees to
refund any sums the State paid for unused Services or Deliverables.
c. The Vendor, at its own expense, shall defend any action brought against the State to the extent that such
action is based upon a claim that the deliverables supplied by the Vendor, their use or operation, infringes
Ver:4/22/19 Page 32 of 41

Proposal Number: 16-20190304 Vendor: Wildlands Engineering, Inc.
on a patent, copyright, trademark or violates a trade secret in the United States. The Vendor shall pay
those costs and damages finally awarded or agreed in a settlement against the State in any such action.
Such defense and payment shall be conditioned on the following:
i. That the Vendor shall be notified within a reasonable time in writing by the State of any Such
claim;and
ii. That the Vendor shall have the sole control of the defense of any action on such claim and all
negotiations for its settlement or compromise provided, however, that the State shall have the
option to participate in such action at its own expense.
d. Vendor will not be required to defend or indemnify the State if any claim by a third party against the State
for infringement or misappropriation results from the State's material alteration of any Vendor-branded
deliverables or services, or from the continued use of the deliverable(s)or Services after receiving notice
of infringement on a trade secret of a third party.
10. TERMINATION FOR CONVENIENCE: If this contract contemplates deliveries or performance over a period of time,
the State may terminate this contract at any time by providing 60 days' notice in writing from the State to the Vendor.
In that event, any or all finished or unfinished deliverables prepared by the Vendor under this contract shall, at the
option of the State, become its property. If the contract is terminated by the State as provided in this section, the
State shall pay for those items for which such option is exercised, less any payment or compensation previously
made.
11. ADVERTISING:Vendor agrees not to use the existence of The Contract or the name of the State of North Carolina
as part of any commercial advertising or marketing of products or Services. A Vendor may inquire whether the State
is willing to act as a reference by providing factual information directly to other prospective customers.
12. ACCESS TO PERSONS AND RECORDS: During and after the term hereof, the State Auditor and any using
agency's internal auditors shall have access to persons and records related to The Contract to verify accounts and
data affecting fees or performance under the Contract,as provided in G.S. 143-49(9),
13. ASSIGNMENT: No assignment of the Vendor's obligations nor the Vendor's right to receive payment hereunder
shall be permitted.
However, upon written request approved by the issuing purchasing authority and solely as a convenience to the
Vendor, the State may:
a) Forward the Vendor's payment check directly to any person or entity designated by the Vendor, and
b) Include any person or entity designated by Vendor as a joint payee on the Vendor's payment check.
In no event shall such approval and action obligate the State to anyone other than the Vendor and the Vendor shall
remain responsible for fulfillment of all Contract obligations. Upon advance written request, the State may, in its
unfettered discretion, approve an assignment to the surviving entity of a merger, acquisition or corporate
reorganization, if made as part of the transfer of all or substantially all of the Vendor's assets. Any purported
assignment made in violation of this provision shall be void and a material breach of The Contract.
14. INSURANCE:
COVERAGE - During the term of the Contract, the Vendor at its sole cost and expense shall provide commercial
insurance of such type and with such terms and limits as may be reasonably associated with the Contract. As a
minimum, the Vendor shall provide and maintain the following coverage and limits:
a) Worker's Compensation - The Vendor shall provide and maintain Worker's Compensation Insurance, as
required by the laws of North Carolina, as well as employer's liability coverage with minimum limits of$500,000.00,
covering all of Vendor's employees who are engaged in any work under the Contract in North Carolina. If any work
is sub-contracted,the Vendor shall require the sub-Contractor to provide the same coverage for any of his employees
engaged in any work under the Contract within the State.
b) Commercial General Liability - General Liability Coverage on a Comprehensive Broad Form on an
occurrence basis in the minimum amount of$1,000,000.00 Combined Single Limit. Defense cost shall be in excess
of the limit of liability.
c) Automobile-Automobile Liability Insurance, to include liability coverage, covering all owned, hired and non-
owned vehicles, used within North Carolina in connection with the Contract. The minimum combined single limit
Ver:4/22/19 Page 33 of 41

Proposal Number: 16-20190304 Vendor: Wildlands Engineering, Inc.
shall be $250,000.00 bodily injury and property damage; $250,000.00 uninsured/under insured motorist; and
$2,500.00 medical payment •
REQUIREMENTS- Providing and maintaining adequate insurance coverage is a material obligation of the Vendor
and is of the essence of The Contract. All such insurance shall meet all laws of the State of North Carolina. Such
insurance coverage shall be obtained from companies that are authorized to provide such coverage and that are
authorized by the Commissioner of Insurance to do business in North Carolina.The Vendor shall at all times comply
with the terms of such insurance policies, and all requirements of the insurer under any such insurance policies,
except as they may conflict with existing North Carolina laws or The Contract. The limits of coverage under each
insurance policy maintained by the Vendor shall not be interpreted as limiting the Vendor's liability and obligations
under the Contract.
15. GENERAL INDEMNITY: The Vendor shall hold and save the State, its officers, agents, and employees, harmless
from liability of any kind, including all claims and losses accruing or resulting to any other person,firm,or corporation
furnishing or supplying work, Services, materials, or supplies in connection with the performance of The Contract,
and from any and all claims and losses accruing or resulting to any person, firm, or corporation that may be injured
or damaged by the Vendor in the performance of The Contract and that are attributable to the negligence or
intentionally tortious acts of the Vendor provided that the Vendor is notified in writing within 30 days from the date
that the State has knowledge of such claims.The Vendor represents and warrants that it shall make no claim of any
kind or nature against the State's agents who are involved in the delivery or processing of Vendor deliverables or
Services to the State. The representation and warranty in the preceding sentence shall survive the termination or
expiration of The Contract.
16. ELECTRONIC PROCUREMENT:
a) Purchasing shall be conducted through the Statewide E-Procurement Service. The State's third-party agent shall
serve as the Supplier Manager for this E-Procurement Service. The Vendor shall register for the Statewide E-
Procurement Service within two (2) business days of notification of award in order to receive an electronic purchase
order resulting from award of this contract.
b) THE SUCCESSFUL BIDDER(S) SHALL PAY A TRANSACTION FEE OF 1.75% (.0175) ON THE TOTAL
DOLLAR AMOUNT (EXCLUDING SALES TAXES) OF ALL GOODS INCLUDED ON EACH PURCHASE ORDER
ISSUED THROUGH THE STATEWIDE E-PROCUREMENT SERVICE.This applies to all purchase orders, regardless
of the quantity or dollar amount of the purchase order. The transaction fee shall not be stated or included as a separate
item on the invoice. There are no additional fees or charges to the Vendor for the services rendered by the Supplier
Manager under this contract. Vendor will receive a credit for transaction fees they paid for the purchase of any item(s)
if an item(s) is returned through no fault of the Vendor. Transaction fees are non-refundable when an item is rejected
and returned, or declined, due to the Vendor's failure to perform or comply with specifications or requirements of the
contract.
c)Vendor or its Authorized Reseller,as applicable,will be invoiced monthly for the State's transaction fee by the Supplier
Manager. The transaction fee shall be based on a) purchase activity for the prior month, or b)purchases for which the
supplier invoice has been paid. Unless Supplier Manager receives written notice from the Vendor identifying with
specificity any errors in an invoice for the transaction fee within thirty (30) days of the receipt of invoice, such invoice
shall be deemed to be correct and Vendor shall have waived its right to later dispute the accuracy and completeness of
the invoice. Payment of the transaction fee by the Vendor is due to the account designated by the State within thirty
(30)days after receipt of the invoice for the transaction fee. If payment of the transaction fee is not received by the State
within this payment period, it shall be considered a material breach of contract. Pursuant to G.S. 147-86.23, the Service
will charge interest and late payment penalties on past due balances. Interest shall be charged at the rate set by the
Secretary of Revenue pursuant to G.S. 105-241.21 as of the date the balances are past due.The late-payment penalty
will be ten percent(10%)of the account receivable. Within thirty(30)days of the receipt of invoice,Vendor may dispute
in writing the accuracy of an invoice. No interest shall be charged on disputed and overdue amounts to the extent the
State agrees to reduce or adjust the amount in dispute. The Supplier Manager shall provide, whenever reasonably
requested by the Vendor in writing(including electronic documents), supporting documentation from the E-Procurement
Service that accounts for the amount of the invoice.
d) The Supplier Manager will capture the order from the State approved user, including the shipping and payment
information,and submit the order in accordance with the E-Procurement Service. Subsequently, the Supplier Manager
Ver:4/22/19 Page 34 of 41

Proposal Number: 16-20190304 Vendor: Wildlands Engineering, Inc.
will send those orders to the appropriate Vendor on State Contract. The State or State-approved user, not the Supplier
Manager, shall be responsible for the solicitation, bids received, evaluation of bids received, award of contract, and the
•
payment for goods delivered.
e)_Vendor shall at all times maintain the confidentiality of its user name and password for the Statewide E-Procurement
Services. If Vendor is a corporation, partnership or other legal entity, then the Vendor may authorize its employees to
use its password. Vendor shall be responsible for all activity and all charges by such employees. Vendor agrees not to
permit a third party to use the Statewide E-Procurement Services through its account. If there is a breach of security
through the Vendor's account, Vendor shall immediately change its password and notify the Supplier Manager of the
security breach by email. Vendor shall cooperate with the State and the Supplier Manager to mitigate and correct any
security breach.
17. SUBCONTRACTING: Performance under The Contract by the Vendor shall not be subcontracted without prior
written approval of the State's assigned Contract Lead. Unless otherwise agreed in writing,acceptance of a Vendor's
proposal shall include approval to use the subcontractor(s)that have been specified therein.
18. CONFIDENTIALITY: Any State information, data, instruments, documents, studies or reports given to or prepared
or assembled by or provided to the Vendor under The Contract shall be kept as confidential, used only for the
purpose(s) required to perform The Contract and not divulged or made available to any individual or organization
without the prior written approval of the State.
19. CARE OF STATE DATA AND PROPERTY: The Vendor agrees that it shall be responsible for the proper custody
and care of any data owned and furnished to the Vendor by the State (State Data), or other State property in the
hands of the Vendor, for use in connection with the performance of The Contract or purchased by or for the State
for The Contract.Vendor will reimburse the State for loss or damage of such property while in Vendor's custody.
The State's Data in the hands of the Vendor shall be protected from unauthorized disclosure, loss, damage,
destruction by a natural event or other eventuality.Such State Data shall be returned to the State in a form acceptable
to the State upon the termination or expiration of this Agreement. The Vendor shall notify the State of any security
breaches within 24 hours as required by G.S. 143B-1379. See G.S. 75-60 et seq.
20. OUTSOURCING: Any Vendor or subcontractor providing call or contact center services to the State of North
Carolina or any of its agencies shall disclose to inbound callers the location from which the call or contact center
services are being provided.
If, after award of a contract, the contractor wishes to relocate or outsource any portion of performance to a location
outside the United States, or to contract with a subcontractor for any such performance, which subcontractor and
nature of the work has not previously been disclosed to the State in writing, prior written approval must be obtained
from the State agency responsible for the contract.
Vendor shall give notice to the using agency of any relocation of the Vendor, employees of the Vendor,
subcontractors of the Vendor, or other persons providing performance under a State contract to a location outside
of the United States.
21. COMPLIANCE WITH LAWS: Vendor shall comply with all laws, ordinances, codes, rules, regulations, and
licensing requirements that are applicable to the conduct of its business and its performance in accordance with
The Contract, including those of federal, state, and local agencies having jurisdiction and/or authority.
22. ENTIRE AGREEMENT: This RFP and any documents incorporated specifically by reference represent the entire
agreement between the parties and supersede all prior oral or written statements or agreements. This RFP, any
addenda hereto, and the Vendor's proposal are incorporated herein by reference as though set forth verbatim.
All promises, requirements, terms, conditions,provisions, representations, guarantees, and warranties contained
herein shall survive the contract expiration or termination date unless specifically provided otherwise herein, or
unless superseded by applicable Federal or State statutes of limitation.
23. ELECTRONIC RECORDS: The State will digitize all Vendor responses to this solicitation, if not received
electronically, as well as any awarded contract together with associated procurement-related documents. These
electronic copies shall constitute a preservation record and shall serve as the official record of this procurement
Ver:4/22/19 Page 35 of 41

Proposal Number: 16-20190304 Vendor: Wildlands Engineering, Inc.
with the same force and effect as the original written documents comprising such record. Any electronic copy,
printout or other output readable by sight shown to reflect such record accurately shall constitute an"original."
24. AMENDMENTS: This Contract may be amended only by a written amendment duly executed by the State and the
Vendor.
25. NO WAIVER: Notwithstanding any other language or provision in The Contract, nothing herein is intended nor
shall be interpreted as a waiver of any right or remedy otherwise available to the State under applicable law. The
waiver by the State of any right or remedy on any one occasion or instance shall not constitute or be interpreted
as a waiver of that or any other right or remedy on any other occasion or instance.
26. FORCE MAJEURE: Neither party shall be deemed to be in default of its obligations hereunder if and so long as it
is prevented from performing such obligations as a result of events beyond its reasonable control, including without
limitation, fire, power failures, any act of war, hostile foreign action, nuclear explosion, riot, strikes or failures or
refusals to perform under subcontracts, civil insurrection, earthquake, hurricane, tornado, or other catastrophic
natural event or act of God.
27. SOVEREIGN IMMUNITY: Notwithstanding any other term or provision in The Contract, nothing herein is intended
nor shall be interpreted as waiving any claim or defense based on the principle of sovereign immunity or other State
or federal constitutional provision or principle that otherwise would be available to the State under applicable law.
•
Ver:4/22/19 Page 36 of 41

Proposal Number: 16-20190304 Vendor: . Wildlands Engineering, Inc.
ATTACHMENT D: LOCATION OF WORKERS UTILIZED BY VENDOR
In accordance with NC General Statute 143-59.4,the Vendor shall detail the location(s)at which performance will occur,
as well as the manner in which it intends to utilize resources or workers outside of the United States in the performance
of this Contract. The State will evaluate the additional risks, costs, and other factors associated with such utilization prior
to making an award. Please complete items a, b, and c below.
a) Will any work under this Contract be performed outside the United States? ❑ YES ® NO
If the Vendor answered"YES"above, Vendor must complete items 1 and 2 below:
1. List the location(s) outside the United States where work under this Contract will be performed by the Vendor,
any sub-Contractors, employees, or other persons performing work under the Contract:
n/a
2. Describe the corporate structure and location of corporate employees and activities of the Vendor, its affiliates
or any other sub-Contractors that will perform work outside the U.S.:
n/a
b) The Vendor agrees to provide notice,in writing to the State,of the relocation of the
Vendor,employees of the Vendor,sub-Contractors of the Vendor,or other persons ® YES ❑ NO
performing services under the Contract outside of the United States
NOTE:All Vendor or sub-Contractor personnel providing call or contact center services to
the State of North Carolina under the Contract shall disclose to inbound callers the
location from which the call or contact center services are being provided.
c) Identify all U.S. locations at which performance will occur:
Design:Asheville and Charlotte, NC/Survey: Asheville, NC
Ver:4/22/19 Page 37 of 41

Proposal Number: 16-20190304 Vendor: Wildlands Engineering, Inc.
ATTACHMENT E: CERTIFICATION OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
Name of Vendor: Wildlands Engineering, Inc.
The undersigned hereby certifies that: [check all applicable boxes)
® The Vendor is in sound financial condition and, if applicable, has received an unqualified audit opinion for the
latest audit of its financial statements.
Date of latest audit: nla
▪ The Vendor has no outstanding liabilities, including tax and judgment liens, to the Internal Revenue Service or
any other government entity.
® The Vendor is current in all amounts due for payments of federal and state taxes and required employment-
related contributions and withholdings.
• The Vendor is not the subject of any current litigation or findings of noncompliance under federal or state law.
O The Vendor has not been the subject of any past or current litigation, findings in any past litigation, or findings
of noncompliance under federal or state law that may impact in any way its ability to fulfill the requirements of
this Contract.
• He or she is authorized to make the foregoing statements on behalf of the Vendor.
Note: This is a continuing certification and Vendor shall notify the Contract Lead within 15 days of any material
change to any of the representations made herein.
If any one or more of the foregoing boxes is NOT checked,Vendor shall explain the reason in the space below:
Box#1: Our CPA has recommended that a full audit is not necessary for firm of our size. Our CPA performs an
annual CPA review of our financials for our bonding company, produces quarterly statements for our bonding
company, and is actively involved in reconciliations and our other regular accounting duties on a monthly basis.
Vdildlands is in sound financial condition.
p' 0 3/2 612 0 2 0
S ature Date
Shawn D. Wilkerson President
Printed Name Title
[This Certification must be signed by an individual authorized to speak for the Vendor]
Ver 4/22/19 Page 38 of 41

Proposal Number 16-20190304 Vendor Wildlands Engineering, Inc.
ATTACHMENT F: SUPPLEMENTAL VENDOR INFORMATION
HISTORICALLY UNDERUTILIZED BUSINESSES
Historically Underutilized Businesses {HUBS} consist of minority, women and disabled business firms that are at least
fifty-one percent owned and operated by an individuai(s) of the categories. Also included in this category are disabled
business enterprises and non-profit work centers for the blind and severely disabled.
Pursuant to G.S. 143B-1361(a), 143-48 and 143-128.4, the State invites and encourages participation in this
procurement process by businesses owned by minorities, women, disabled, disabled business enterprises and non-
profit work centers for the blind and severely disabled. This includes utilizing subcontractors to perform the required
functions in this RFP.Any questions concerning NC HUB certification,contact the North Carolina Office of Historically
Underutilized Businesses at [phone]. The Vendor shall respond to question#1 and#2 below.
a) Is Vendor a Historically Underutilized Business? ❑ Yes ® No
CO Is Vendor Certified with North Carolina as a Historically Underutilized Business? ❑ Yes ® No
If so, state HUB classification:
Ver 4/22/19 Page 39 of 41

Proposal Number: 16-20190304 Vendor: Wildlands Engineering, Inc.
ATTACHMENT G: VENDOR'S INFORMATION
Vendors Primary Contact(or Project Manager)
Name: Jake McLean, PE,CFM
Agency: Wildlands Engineering, Inc.
Title: Senior Water Resources Engineer
Address: 167-B Haywood Rd.
City: Asheville State/Zip: NC,28806
Telephone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
Vendors Execution Address(Where the contract should be mailed for signature)
Name: Shawn D.Wilkerson
Agency: Wildlands Engineering, Inc.
Title: President
Address: 1430 S.Mint Street, Suite 104
City: Charlotte State/Zip: NC,28203
Telephone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
Vendors Payment(Remit To)Address(Where the checks should be mailed
(This address should agree with the"Remit-To"address associated with the Vendor's Tax ID.This information
must be verified with the Vendor's Corporate Accounting Office)
Name: Shawn D.Wilkerson
Agency: Wildlands Engineering, Inc.
Title: President
Address: 1430 S. Mint Street, Suite 104
City: Charlotte State/Zip: NC,28203
Telephone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
Ver:4/22/19 Page 40 of 41

Instructions:
1. Immediately save this with your new, desired filename.
2. Fill out all areas highlighted in yellow.
3. Place the letter "x" in appropriate box for multiple choice questions.
Technical Proposal Evaluation Criteria
8-digit CU Rating Form
Offeror: Wildlands Engineering, Inc.
Site Name: Cornbread Valley Mitigation Site (Option 1)
River Basin
/ Catalog Little Tennessee/06010202
Unit:
RFP
Number: #16-20190304
Date of Site
Evaluation:
Type/Amt of
Mitigation Restoration/4,520 Cold Stream Credits
Offered:
Proposal
Review
Committee:
Alternate
Attendees:

Section 1. Minimum Requirements
Yes/No
or N/A
1-For stream mitigation projects,does the Technical Proposal adequately document the historical presence of
stream(s)on the project site, provide the drainage areas(acres)and provide accurate, process-based Yes
descriptionsof all project stream reaches and tributaries?
2-For proposals that include wetland mitigation,does the technical proposal adequately document the
presence of hydric soil indicators(including soil boring logs prepared by a Licensed Soil Scientist and a map N/A
showing soil boring locations and mapped soil series)?
3-For proposals that include wetland mitigation,does the proposed success hydroperiod follow the IRT
Guidance for the project site and soil series?If the proposed hydroperiod differs from the IRT guidance, N/A
justification must beprovided in the RFP.
4-Does the proposal adequately document the physical,chemical and/or biological impairments that
currently exist on the project site? Yes
5-Does DMS agree with the overall mitigation approach (proposed levels of intervention) presented?[The
Technical Proposal must demonstrate that the proposed mitigation activities are appropriate for existing site
conditions and watershed characteristics(e.g.,adjacent land use/land cover),and are optimized to yield
Yes
maximum functional gains.]
6- Does DMS agree with the proposed credit structure(s)described in the proposal? Yes
7- Does the proposed project avoid significant adverse impacts to existing wetlands and/or streams? Yes
8- Does the proposal adequately describe how the project will advance DMS watershed planning goals? Yes
9-For any proposed Priority 2 restoration, is P2 justified and/or limited to"tie-ins"? Yes
An answer of No in this section means the Technical Proposal is rejected. Continue or Reject? Continue

Section 2. Functional Uplift Evaluation
Functional Functional Stressor Functional Uplift Potential Planning Identified Stressor
Category
Complete this section for identified
Place an X below if stressor is
Check boxes below to functional stressors ONLY. Place an X
identified through watershed
identify stressors addressed under the option that best describes the
planning-only count the MOST
by proposal. uplift potential for the majority of the LOCAL plan.
project area.
Low Mod High Very High TRA RWP LWP
Non-functioning
x riparian buffer/ x x
� wetland vegetation
D
x Sediment x x
0
x Nutrients x x
(1)
CO x Fecal Coliform x x
Other
x Peak Flows x x
>-
ttO
_O x Artificial Barriers x x
O
L_
-0 Ditching/Draining
>-
Other: Pond
x Habitat Fragmentation x x
Limited Bedform
(13}' x x
x Diversity
co Absence of Large
= x Woody Debris x x
Other
Total Count Total
0 4 2 3 Count 9 0 0
C 0 Multiplier
co x1 x3 x6 x10 x 2 x4 x6
co D
c v) Count x Function Count X
•0 bD Multiplier Planning
v p 0 12 12 30 Multiplier 18 0 0
c C=
D C
d
Sum of Function A Sum of B
54 Planning 18

Adjusted Risk Factor E Only Applicable if this Box is Checked
Total Restoration Enhancement Total Restoration and Enhancement Feet Risk Adjusted Score
and Enhancement Restoration Feet Enhancement Feet a c
Feet Restoration Feet+( ) (Sum of Function X Factor )
Feet
C D
7,312 2,154 5,158 1.54 83
Risk Adjusted ScoreD+ PlanningB = Total Function and Planning 101
Section 3. General (place an X in the appropriate box)
1pt 3 pts 6 pts 10 pts
What percent of the request does the proposed
wetland project provide?
(if applicable)
What percent of the request does the proposed
stream project provide?
(if applicable)
>5% 2-5% <2% None
Physical constraints or barriers
x
>12 8-12 0-8
Easement Continuity
x
>10 8-10 4-8 <4
Project Density
Total General F
3 0 0 0 3
Section 4. Final Score and Proposal Rating
Total Function and 101 E
Planning
Total General 3 F
Final Score (E + F) 104
Proposal Rating (Final
1.04
Score x 0.01)

Instructions:
1. Immediately save this with your new, desired filename.
2. Fill out all areas highlighted in yellow.
3. Place the letter "x" in appropriate box for multiple choice questions.
Technical Proposal Evaluation Criteria
8-digit CU Rating Form
Offeror: Wildlands Engineering, Inc.
Site Name: Cornbread Valley Mitigation Site (Option 2)
River Basin
/ Catalog Little Tennessee/06010202
Unit:
RFP
Number: #16-20190304
Date of Site
Evaluation:
Type/Amt of
Mitigation Restoration/ 3,634 Cold Stream Credits
Offered:
Proposal
Review
Committee:
Alternate
Attendees:

Section 1. Minimum Requirements
Yes/No
or N/A
1-For stream mitigation projects,does the Technical Proposal adequately document the historical presence of
stream(s)on the project site, provide the drainage areas(acres)and provide accurate, process-based Yes
descriptionsof all project stream reaches and tributaries?
2-For proposals that include wetland mitigation,does the technical proposal adequately document the
presence of hydric soil indicators(including soil boring logs prepared by a Licensed Soil Scientist and a map N/A
showing soil boring locations and mapped soil series)?
3-For proposals that include wetland mitigation,does the proposed success hydroperiod follow the IRT
Guidance for the project site and soil series?If the proposed hydroperiod differs from the IRT guidance, N/A
justification must beprovided in the RFP.
4-Does the proposal adequately document the physical,chemical and/or biological impairments that
currently exist on the project site? Yes
5-Does DMS agree with the overall mitigation approach (proposed levels of intervention) presented?[The
Technical Proposal must demonstrate that the proposed mitigation activities are appropriate for existing site
conditions and watershed characteristics(e.g.,adjacent land use/land cover),and are optimized to yield
Yes
maximum functional gains.]
6- Does DMS agree with the proposed credit structure(s)described in the proposal? Yes
7- Does the proposed project avoid significant adverse impacts to existing wetlands and/or streams? Yes
8- Does the proposal adequately describe how the project will advance DMS watershed planning goals? Yes
9-For any proposed Priority 2 restoration, is P2 justified and/or limited to"tie-ins"? Yes
An answer of No in this section means the Technical Proposal is rejected. Continue or Reject? Continue

Section 2. Functional Uplift Evaluation
Functional Functional Stressor Functional Uplift Potential Planning Identified Stressor
Category
Complete this section for identified
Place an X below if stressor is
Check boxes below to functional stressors ONLY. Place an X
identified through watershed
identify stressors addressed under the option that best describes the
planning-only count the MOST
by proposal. uplift potential for the majority of the LOCAL plan.
project area.
Low Mod High Very High TRA RWP LWP
Non-functioning
x riparian buffer/ x x
� wetland vegetation
D
x Sediment x x
0
x Nutrients x x
(1)
CO x Fecal Coliform x x
Other
x Peak Flows x x
>-
ttO
_O x Artificial Barriers x x
O
L_
-0 Ditching/Draining
>-
Other: Pond
x Habitat Fragmentation x x
Limited Bedform
(13}' x x
x Diversity
co Absence of Large
= x Woody Debris x x
Other
Total Count Total
0 4 2 3 Count 10 0 0
—coC 0 Multiplier
co x1 x3 x6 x10 x 2 x4 x6
co D
c v) Count x Function Count X
0 bD Multiplier Planning
+_+ p 0 12 12 30 Multiplier 20 0 0
v •-
D C
Sum of Function A Sum of B
CL 54 Planning 20

Adjusted Risk Factor E Only Applicable if this Box is Checked
Total Restoration Enhancement Total Restoration and Enhancement Feet Risk Adjusted Score
and Enhancement Restoration Feet Enhancement Feet a c
Feet Restoration Feet+( ) (Sum of Function X Factor )
Feet
C D
5,923 1,802 3,901 1.58 85
Risk Adjusted ScoreD+ PlanningB = Total Function and Planning 105 E
Section 3. General (place an X in the appropriate box)
1pt 3 pts 6 pts 10 pts
What percent of the request does the proposed
wetland project provide?
(if applicable)
What percent of the request does the proposed
stream project provide?
(if applicable)
>5% 2-5% <2% None
Physical constraints or barriers
x
>12 8-12 0-8
Easement Continuity
x
>10 8-10 4-8 <4
Project Density
Total General F
3 0 0 0 3
Section 4. Final Score and Proposal Rating
Total Function and E
105
Planning
Total General F
3
Final Score (E + F) 108
Proposal Rating (Final 1.08
Score x 0.01)

t j— r I — 1 —, .-r
06010202040020 1 s . ,.•'''.. _
T �, - 1 * 06010202040010
,„....•^ ^.." ' . m.•.- - 4 ...y , ,!-- . ob • • • •l•-r).
■ ■ • fPp
.r a ■ • • ■ • ■ . y /• - •06010202040020 , .�-
. • tGillespie-Harrison Fa / ` Slagle'Farm NC Clean Water • -.‘C-' 4AwFQRD CH r`
Management Trust Fund Project // R
1 �yyz
Mainspring Conservation f.■.%_ % l 4�
Trust Easement - �0601020203002U
061; 4 .. NC Clean Water Management / ;;;,,,yyy
i :.- Trust Fund Project4/-"iebrefre:10#' t- ...-', ' ;
Vi
Patton House Ervin y
V . "Illwoiro,"4. /.. 3 \ .
/ / .
,•.: - A*644, ild 4013 Cartoogechaye Creek Aquatic Habitat /f Aff -
i . '
202 20030.. ,
Vrira.MArIktck
�1L! - �''• Virginia Jone- '��')��-•�'}•._• • Knob. , _ �A
_ ,�+ / Relax Inn, 4 0 0
D.'b_son Mountain _f/�
/ ;i j _ f x _ "Union United Methodist ',
h J r
Nantahala National Forest`=. Church Parsonage _ / r
1 Nantahala Ranger District, / • ' r
Project Location r '
r r /.y •�`,_,+ .`- - (Catchment ID 19736155) I
/// I _ Runaway Knob Registers_d + ,9./ . Little Tennessee River Aquatic Habitat
.• Heritage Area - . 1+ - ' Y.
1 ri-
Nantahala National Forest-
1 Foster Knob/Rockyface Mountain /5#4.1"
_
F Nantahala Ranger District j
. ,,,,e,..„ 1 ,.. ... _.
I '- r. 'lir :/X- .Ale VAZipb. ; ir
Appalachian Tray . t Lee Creek Seep The Needmore Game Land or1 � eG 'Dedicated Nature Preserve
Ilk lei
06010202020020 Dr.Alexander C.Brabson House
s
Mainspring Conservation Trust Easement
\ \ Albert Mountain/Pinnacle Mountain
Nantahala River Wetlands ::.>„../............•'•
Otto School /
/;
06010202650010 +
/.....
t )~
Macon 00 I
.00
Clay !....-
Project Location Q Little Tennessee 02 River Basin - NC Historic Preservation Areas __ _ Water Quality TRA
L Five Mile Radius j_,_I Hydrologic Unit Code(14-Digit) Significant Natural Heritage Areas K//] Habitat TRA
o r—"1
41 L_.—pCount Line Water SupplyWatershed NC Natural Heritage Program Managed Areas I Hydrology TRA
_ .
Municipalities Targeted Local Watersheds ® Airports
303d Listed Streams
' Il
killika, Figure 1 Vicinity Map
VLT I L D L A N D 5 0 0.75 1.5 Miles Cornbread Valley Mitigation Site
EN G I N E E R I N G I I I I I N Little Tennessee River Basin (06010202)
Macon County, NC

�t. i ! Proposed Conservation Easement d ' r ,'Y" LIM
nProject Parcels r•' p
t j// Existing Livestock Pasture _:y ;,•:'
Perennial Stream Y j° � • 's . ' ,,
•••—•••— Intermittent Stream -. "
'' _ �Uy3 Reach 1 ��
Q Reach Breaks
Non-Project Stream t, i46•- UT3 R:te i '
}
L Linear Seep -\ +Az � /�/
S` ..'. /
•
Aggradation -r, 0 - 4
e.
Erosion � Q(1 Olt,
Incision �i`'�- -� O �� /
44
Existing Berm
.. 0 Knick Pointq -
fir, ,,/1
❑ Existing Springbox 1 pat, ,, •-Affif _
Existing Culvert p ',
•— Existing Utility Line •
l
.: ,,e 44/A1.4:
7 Existing Utility Pole , � �.. ,m
Livestock Trampled Area , ., _'Jones - ;
S 4•
*.r '?
4.. '„ ' / —; •P 'ki
„ ,...... 4 -4 't ,
a"
1.a�"t�k, '' �N- �"1 '� ? .....
/tf /
/ � III►"
' �,/ j gyp, �� \'
- i JonJkyReach 2
f
>� t -
Q3C §314
. 1401fr,•44,4,?.. 4".0"/J4 : //. .4
(/'
�; jV 1, ® , O. .1
1'
+ 1 fl
:
h2018Aena(•' :• At
Figure 2 Site Map
Oa W I LD LANDS Cornbread Valley Mitigation Site
0 300 Feet , Little Tennessee River Basin 06010202
ENGINEERING I I I N Macon County,NC
Scale Bari"

Proposed Conservation Easement
Project Parcels i/ Il
ki..._ -- , "-N 11-Nrie-s:"'" (7%k...in,'"
4\""\\.4)%c:.
Pikir: -"kr *461 \\
r.
)11)sou
\eve.4,4 ". .01."1 js
' .0/
j ''. .— '
.1r 414, .'• ii / .
k _ • —1.
/161.1
\ S. .• S., , \ . C 1.
't, a..\ i \ \ \•-:: ," . j
'lap
(19 . . A 1
711, • :,%
, 1
i
I ,.... ...... --' , . 14.1"44:47: CGII 44
•
I-.- ' N /' i a
+ 2) " Ter
. -0
~.. _ ice ',i. _ `.01
11
„J.
,....„........„)
.`` 7 /
/I: vi„,
' ....:./
; ' - --�a is.
iii I /
r .e-4
.f r 1
IL *1
• ,..._
., ..av." A .....- 7
Prentiss, NC USGS 7.5 Minute Topographic Quadrangle ri--,- ,..„ .
i _ i
Figure 3 USGS Topographic Map
W I L D L A N D S Cornbread Valley Mitigation Site
41,4111p 0 300 600 Feet Little Tennessee River Basin 06010202
ENGINEERING 11111
Macon County, NC
N

-,�. .lr" 0 o
t t ty ���p,�„'�� A fi:;
{ \� w �7 i , / Ifi
J 'rah � C :°'
0..3.,/.i)_.,
�,: � � om' � ���
U v
:',14,:_4?".,.- '-..t,-1,) , 1 I l'---.1 J-f,,,,, 'w• -_,L,------:-, •'., ') tr, '''• - --.• ' •'. '1," '' -'
' - --.4.L 7 , ,,„.,:',('' -S' '• i ,,,, , _ - _ .. ' 1 , \ \1p H _._ _=
v
r ,,,,,
:_.„..I.,,, .--r- • __-_:=-.1-j% _),' .i, •- •,
r_
,-..;_,F:,,,,__ _. .
1, __ _ _ __ ____ _
\1 1 ,r. �_ \_�\� .III\ \' ,�` `\.
ui
oci., — ,.,__1,,
_._ ,
., ____ ,f_____ ,_ _,__._. . ,_.., r.___...._._.,
>>
___
..
__
, , ..
. .„.. . .
- it (l r
s.
' i
_. ' „ , ._
I - --
t
/
)-
._. 1 rJ
,7 ,.._ ., ,...Jr , .
\ l�
___ \ ,
, _
f - Q; z
Z
I
Q [n V h r)
O H H H H H O
Li
,',-, 431
� ) -i. i

\\\ '1
U
yny
y'
.1014141,
\ ♦ F a
' �71
.41"k ' • ,!,,-, '. -.44111r, .,. , .49*,,41011e. . Evc ,,ep ,
40,
ScC
' EvD r:�ram.
i
'41444,
•
EvD'' '
N kA
EvD
Dgli
SIDD
EJD
r:,
L
r-j y..
• 4= 1 444
L-J 2l.
Sr El '<'`f
ScC Dg Li G.1 L J "4-'✓
(?-;:'
Ifao,, i . Proposed Conservation Easement
." i rt,,t iN.,_ n Project Parcels
,. t
%, /, , t°, Perennial Stream
Dgi
7/Y
---- Intermittent Stream
�- ,1 t — Non-Project Stream
I Soilsr, -
s ce - d '\ - DgB-Dellwood gravelly fine sandy loam,0-5%slopes
9 / sc
i
t .0- - EvC-Evard-Cowee complex,2-8%slopes
/ ��
'�✓ .' - EvD-Evard-Cowee complex,15-30%slopes
/ C
;.�.�o� NkA-Nikwasi fine sandy loam,0-2%slopes
/ '� T ,' `�fCreep�A cre`s�p
,yy r `�. y. - SbD-Saunook gravelly loam,15-30%slopes
- ScB-Saunook loam,2-8%slopes
- ScC-Saunook loam,8-15%slopes
41. -.�� TrE-Trimontgravelly loam,30-50%slopes
2018 Aenal Photography F T
Figure 5 Soils Map
04 WILD LANDS Cornbread Valley Mitigation Site
0 300 600 Feet Little Tennessee River Basin 06010202
ENGINEERING I I I I I Macon County,NC
N

-----, l__--/ „xf
I/ ,
i , Proposed Conservation Easement
Project Parcels
!j ." „ Internal Crossing 1.,Stream Restoration alai? j r
Stream Enhancement I - - Aa
•Stream Enhancement II e T3' . i
yy4
Stream Enhancement II-No Credit
Reach 2
4.
Q Reach Breaks - /."`
Proposed BMP `•i G� �I
Non-Project Stream W �T I
••• Existing Waterline /
Utility Line To Remain w. _ r,t
'Utility Line to Be Removed * O —JL/ • 1
3 G
/ —f Utility Line New Alignment f W - _ •
•
,`P.
O�j O \ Reach 3 / ) :1
Ia
O y
10 '.
wt.,
.:410... .f .„OP 4 :..,, . -...•.
may. ' � 9I i
fi
/ / teed `'
- G
/ ey ,�,�may,
`, o') �> 'r i
Reach 2
i , ''''**4. . ''
o
tee.'
-' � .O g
•
C132
;:i 5 , ff . Plphh,
Oil
111
Zr----N
1
Figure 6a Concept Map-Option 1
41 pillir WI LD LAN D S Cornbread Valley Mitigation Site
0 300 Feet , Little Tennessee River Basin 06010202
ENGINEERING I I I N Macon County,NC
Scale Bar 1"

. °FI \ \ J I \
L__ . Proposed Conservation Easement //// /
nProject Parcels �;;
to ?,...
Y'
Internal Crossing - I
Stream Restoration ' -
Stream Enhancement I
•c
Stream Enhancement II
Stream Enhancement II-No Credit 'rite rjy;�r
.�r..
® Reach Breaks '� F;
Proposed BMP , '
Ye..
Non-Project Stream
Existing Waterline f �I
--ID— Utility Line To Remain
s Utility Line to Be Removed - [350�` /` l�,
.. —� Utility Line New Alignment -- _ // ��' .
I I r;e
ii
'''s4:1:1\ro
,, / ,
Reach 3
) ,‘
1 F
1
A
•
y #� it; '1
....- „ (s)A01), 1.
•
~` \ - - x
/ :� s"
\ �r � 1 v •, III,
i
.14
{yam A
§ aY4� 0. ..
2019 +L - 0 .
Figure 6b Concept Map-Option 2
Olt WI LD LANDS Cornbread Valley Mitigation Site
0 300 Feet , Little Tennessee River Basin 06010202
ENGINEERING tailI I I N Macon County,NC
Scale Bari"

N.
' ' ''s`y�,1i,.,4-4 44ifqq� 144 {•r i..�•lf�r T:F�Y Ad ply
f , .S i�,,• y aF + ' �j , , 7�'•.
1 r 'Sf ti;''1 ,!1 1 ,'.L''i -r `i,1 . !Itt:
: .411.1,
. 1 Y*. ! Si, • 4 i-*' 41 •,• 'I ►
...,?r, • fel,. -' - • :-L• fib(1'..i: 1 '-' tli ii 4.1r / 4....P 1 •11-- ' —•
4' .7''''‘'''l '.140 - . 111 ft1; i? ‘ . r4'i6.41P *- P • ' .. • ' I. L' -...1* ,_ • .j..‘44k,' i' -.,- .., -. ,
•
• , ,4 7. .} ►. p.' _r.-
i,e 4 Ik ', , ti 1.■iTi
• - . 1,, - -, 1. ' •-g.4.4
IS• .1',11)1,t441 \ - A
-tkillift- ;_: .
', t , 1
! (� 1 f is ,
r.s;, E t fr• "
•
,...1..*. ..4.1,.4..,::.,:::),,.,,r_,),(...::...c...,:2,;,1;4.,....r.,,,,:. .,%.,;,,.,'..•4.......1,,,..,,,r.. ..i
lc. • P.-- i „p
. ...41.4.4.‘ ',/•. 0,1.;‘,.144. 4eir!?,j..1;.,43'‘‘,:; .f% .fil.?/'j .'
- ' Z 1.4 iii,'s'!iiPf;. '7.1V i il'..',a 4k0 , 4 , ( i .,,., *...,,,, f.,11,....„ 4 ,
... ,o,,,t, . . .. . .,., , k . ,-i. J. , , )zi,. . . !el(
...3 •,:viii.4 ,:.',..'v..... . -,-... ..,,,Aret .
I;
.fr . ., ,,., .,,,,......,1.4.... ,!.10,..0,...;‘,....t4,4.„:. .14.4;.:i.:Iti '..,11•-•,-14 t.;(),!'t
..4'r 7I\
R: 1
4. -/f, •uf';'IL%!`.1-••4#-•It.'i• jall
" 4 •+. ' 5.. t 1 . , ., y e' tit
I i - i �. . , . .�,. _ WI
t 14, L �' 'yet '` 1 7
JALT im ;fI•; 44 '
14 .0 k
4,tiii,„ ,'"'A.:...411111::111111 -'1111 ' •-.."1' li?
elm-
‘..''t•'PAP:Pf;i::!..01 44.4.t..;f:..--...,:;411kr: ,...4.14-'''''''';1::itt::'.!.11--411.-,.:44'.1k'',.4*•,1,1:11'.::It:itc-'fr.-i t.,' .,.r'#.4,•1 7„c•.p,r 1.,1:,zg,-.it1r•:p,i,,.',i,,-4,"..
%•..;.l r,.t4,P.vA,,,t..
r.
, i .
,; _ v` F k,,.'Iq-:,',,....f.,,rrh,...9....
,4 1.,, - . �j' ' 4 ; , 11 "L'F;
.0v
.it'.,.,z•,',.4),...4.„I,.,
.,,Li.i:to,.:.4.4'1%;,.,,....,."t.,e4:*.•/:,1.;':..7 14‘r..44)i'P'vfvAtFi:tr...144'..,'. :.;,,i_.....!i.gi,
, •• , L '4 • t , 1./:-. ' .,ef;04,-.,- ....
q4' 'i d..' •,f .,: , •,►- Mf� 1 �'i fi�'�I_ 0'4 F, j, L • r% t; r' •+
fe
iS
,.
. I 4 ', • .. . '''''' rill_2,4,, ...
. ..., . , t).,,,i-,,,,,,";,:,,,.,4.. ...i.,. . .,,,„,,. L., . , ?fk ...
s. ft :Tr,ir :,. ,c t;if r/,, 11-: .-g. . c . ... , .;,.4 q: 1. 1414 '. I Ao-k' At.. 1 . 0.•' AV•
I NQU4RY#:5996243.5 '-� •
'y�� ��T+'1 ` i; `;t �r+i �4 5 �, d ,iF ' {kr, L
i N ;� �. zdp• �e t e '1 7 r,' •1
YEAR: 2016 ',,1,, :5 •:F: } ,µ;r`r k,,g ;S "+�' {
y y r'i rr r r L �•'r ,,, k' r t
n R. 'NA�i ‘-.11'•li'r .:w4 i hfl `5 � •;• • 1 ]y I
FOR s. •r• r' 14. h ,r •
, —500' C

..i - ;•-•.••• .4„ : • ,' ' 4-•..% ••.•4 'r: • v.,,A--;.., ;-N. 1,,,44A.• 1,f ."•-•
a: i• v•- ri ', -•:2, •'f, le rt. .,,',..L.!:-3,.' we.64,4- . . 141: 4.a.;•z • Li.`11 •N''4'4,-....lic,,,I.L.• .:-_, .t• •,, , ,, . . , Airz•-s,
,....,n•2,. .....L„.:_ :,.% 4,"4-.., .47:0 by 0,2:Q-,..k.. ',,-,:‘,.•tlav'' .I. .e ,, -4,14..-V 0,_' A? •'-:' _.04 1. Aito +.1*. . . 7g t''.?I- •;te„, •,, 1 ,,,...•,- ,;••• k•
i‘;
v.v4-..,...'•-,,,-,`'.0-7.."-'1%)..-, Irv...14 q1.1.i,,,. ...c. ..1...›.-7 slivzi. ,.-,,,,,, • 0,..• ..:•.r., 1, . , fh,",.%,-..0,0 •At;„,.--.-k., . :•:_it . .. ..i
."'"•r•O' '..--4T"')X.-1't!g.`'..i1-•.A1A.19 4.,v.''4!(Ait 1....4....i.-;"....11 Z.: l'O-. '.i :' • ' ','Pr • .1'4 1 1......lb I: ' .14:•40-: ii,. t:•c4:1 ..e.-,r., ,... -r .,,t'..
• " *•r '..4•.-t4,,V•0-..}i-i •;679: '..4..,411.7- ._,,&" 0. ...1.-c-1,-- ........,:...,v •.,.., , - . te . • 4 " . it-.. t ', ,V I , ..,, .:4:4 .
4-ft .:: 1...r1:=Itt4i. ).3..91 6.-. --tNi-it==I...i-L-A,4=',.. ...,',. . "4' ki?.1 i 4- i. v -4' = • - -
....4p....r. .._O. 1'1- •••t
;:ik.rtif.4.'',1;;L.yfr.:-..,A+ L,'% I.Iiif„00.Pre..; f ripi 74''t141're;Licr lik'c'ir'71k. -. ' J%V ‘, ' ,,_ _it.. .i,...i.-R...... :". -- ..., -...-,
4' 4 i:v'- *t-PArVill''.k..e .-4%, ,.--.,.A,:4,›; ..---,N.15 . ! 4. etts. ". •-• e t-.1 •' ,..);-1,,‘ sq_:•44:- -,„„•4, - ••••4- 4,? *1 Jf.-
-.4i "sw. . - i-'u t.4..• * • '':.,tp-•• r-ir er. v-i.._,A.2,-..-* -,-011W.....164 4 '% V,, Ar. '•-•?..*:',,,, .t..?tif-1•2- e?•-''',••'.• 9.,
iv
... • ..474,to;.! 4 ...• ,.. .,. .4‘. 41, '.'t. ,;,,,*'.4., '1*.t4,_V, t•C‘ji:'-it7,9. 24:,.1.i•%a', :.-?:* 4 1 ..-• IlitioN.itt-..t.;;.• 1111 111..":47-r;ik''''' '64...-t /;%is!...i''* •
-4r V.:+44r. ii'. Ta;',., , 10- •• ' atik,r431:•. 40 4,A..F., .....P, , L, , .43N7 ,..1, . ''' ...bk.' ilS. 11) A... 31.•-.•k•,•••'z.z.,7....!f.i N,
- N."ti-,1,,%-_,..1",:isi__Ii -.;,-T-,..57 . ".‘,#. ---44,-7,,,,,T..,.-.';,,.*-.-.1 i ;,,' _ . .-, ,i -,,„Ii."., . - bk"*%'''.- •• A t144:.:.- 'fi: : ..*,4• 4-'11
1/2"•.'•... . • - #1
- -. 4 A l'''• to.'"4%.°;P. ' t• 4"
'. - . . .., ...„ -004t .;Frrir
- ...= j,- -:44.• 4'.+.$4.4 -4110kt v_.'11/40 . „,'.1117 ' . '--.: . ., a 4.4, _4:,-eii....7,,/,:•:1i.h.,..;'*ie.:.%:..
. •. -.4, 4.3,i, !....k7,•=.;:lb' i -- ,,, .4.• :liff..i,_ r•- .;,7. 30 1.-A....vri, 'I; ' ' 7 te.:Itj,,-;„ 1.. .$:t.A. :`,,,..'2.;t()..i34.`-v,--....A.-
, 1
-.?....:!)-, ;ri-, )4.-..vi:, '.1,,ilt,.,../.,:-,$-,~.., , p...u, -,..t-i,vo- ., • ' %I. . ,i, r 4,...--;,-,..),-, 1:..,4:6,-tip z.,-,,s,....,,li ,...rt.._.
i, -:•:::;pi) :- • isym .tictl: .t, "T.:;61(oVo'4;• '7,. -s• jc`, ?e'v•.7v i.Ni v.r„,%. ,ti.I;:-c,'op.-
;.4.1!,...NI •drie4 . ...t.t::,4:•i,t........v. • q. ,*11. ••_.„.,•,c t .. so
< ' I" ...,• -P.4.4k-4,' il .4.41‘e . ..-..1;L: i 7
€•,,;.,,,,,,. .0.!,4 -- -14;7: t •• 1-1-kiiii-..::;-.1; sit Pt- L . /2.. . -54iti.
h,„,....„_.... ..,...„,..- • • „-,0•,.. '- s''k • ..,..r. .-i• 4..• 1 ..•-•,:if •,,,,,,....‘ • . : .,NII.--• r. ..el'as...../-1,Tt..'AA.4 ?:411Z:::://,---,-;''1
.t-*NZ:,10:,'.,• - • . ' . ..,:ti 1/44-,..„.. - 114.i- "g ;r- '14. '- 4,1,64! •:1 •.. I ' .14 ,r.'t-. tsFi•f. ,. r,-.„4-V' -
4e4`-r ".= • ;•, . •elf, ,,....e,i+.--.v.....Irtii --47.,..-4.• , .•,:=,•-. --• - ., . '•
yo,
'.4,1.i.k'•'4'ii,%:IA "C., .. .t.- 4-.. . °''-44t.:(...,..1;-.,.w,o,t::%. .t. . , 1 . e. - • s, :., 1, .,-,4- i.•t-aiii..• . = , .4„.1.1/4..
4..: 4.`,,,,--:4117:,if •,........',414';•11,4 .. -.4150.411)...411-: :e•-'"141','...4::,:t:'*. ..:1-f• ' ..1•4;;1144"rfler*v-1411''%„,;:t-
1§ .- $4,1 k lyik i- -*•• - -
••;."1‘••••1'e 'r•e.iL:3/ .‘ • ''' - -,' 1.'.1 '1,,..L' 4..„,,,A .4. K', bi,Sk• - •%
. t -'4,41.'4-tisr;s•-..• ,..4.,... , r. ... pit
',N.-v•-.1..,.. ..,,zt.i . ..-...-'..,. : t ..Ni, ...ki, . ,. a• ...„. . • le: ....„-•• i".1.Y. Ila • •"' •2... ..., . „Ir.;
'-‘•!.."i;j•-• ' '..t.,. 4 ‘-.' . .
k.,‘ Ittrii
iitAt
,Ifil\:.-r,. . '•
4.'''A 4-'.•.'1 . - •11 I I i r. ?et.'• 41351,4,..•!4-1:4`• ; 11.a.i. .tri.v. ....-,e-
-Ak: dr.' 04.".5..,Trfr•,-,11/28,..
ir1k1:1,41ilit, . 94711Hk:*-111141
V.‘,.'1'.•'.1,.St• i"k t''- e! .',
?r ,k-'. .,,Vic . .t1.`. .. . -
',.[ ' --to% .4 ' '''4.'
'f ‘1.3•:.t:'',F;..:". !' '..?t.74,• _ ty,,, .L. .q:i:cy- : . %,4L„
01.;• 41.. 5',,,i,'!..'.4.:Lk_,.,14.-5,;-: 11%..„1. -..4., "N,e, ..,,,k .- 2
-.- V' So , •t ',..,"• A V•.=t, ..0Vc1.3/4'•••‘`-.1•%••‘•
.. iii'..f6..,:tiiT',.f?.., ;tr .f^Z.,e r;•Is,4.: • ..i..•',::,.., •‘,.',•••Nii.' 1?,, -.4, k 4-\'''.'- Zr:IVI-Jib - "VP 4--'jffril V sit*-....'4-1,,,t ..r.:, 5.."...v..,.z ,..,,
i•i 4.• .'• ',
!..;,.,k,, ., . ..4 ,.,-, .,.•... .,::4.{.$1••• li'4‘-k11 - ' '';!. .i. lit: r .. -.''LL3' .4t$lat"t:MA14.i,V :1.1$0.444-4.1 "ltri.
' ...- '., .r, -...' • - .10,-. ..i , •,..I •,,-...1,,, ,',....., i. 4
-kJ...j-7-.4' r:"'•%.. '•. . ' •-e. f Aith-v,4:43,1•0;•.ti 10 7 i ANWirtiv • ••at,
,,;,,,. -4., ', ;',..1.. ':L.P• . _k. "iL'r'(::.S4 L'Aa:. '4,,',I.‘.', -, ...Lk. = '''.':. f''''' •P
• • Iv ...t. • .;
...".i. ' 4• - • •ta.11' -. -' l, ,'-ii4 i. .";' • -- , 10'Apc i'..1 r..,.,,.. . . . - !.11• -•• - '
'''.•..11- .t.,:, ...• ....1• irir • ; :^i. '•, ",,(....e„,••L.., •A C. '
•40-7, -1.17, ;It. - :...•., -
• -.•.!--,,t; .„D' 4,,,,. .. ,,. .,, , N : 1-: '''''....c:: ' 4. Voil..V.7.-4:1;,,•.17. 4..kt, •k,:x?4'!
, V" -1.9',4,' .t - '''.'-4r.A...?• leL.A5-•-• .'ir'611'
-:•Lejr t ' :-Y•li IV. .i.' --i."..i..1.. .), -1116-.'7t,„ ''. '• 1\ , 4/CiL...;.' . ._ *.1.141,0"$''..11‘1....,2...III;•ii•O•iiit- '...ir• . :%`',-
I
ii&N 4,....:.. , ......-tt, , •:;._!...,..v;:o..izi.„..7...itiL 4.-j. ••,. L4-.;94:•t- i..
' . : " 94'''j 4(- iii.',It it ...'s,'..''. ',1'-::`,1,,:.1:4\!--• '
f,Lilt" , , :,.‘-...t. -fc%, ,_.,: ,.1••••-d.'44*'..Vilrft,,ii-'1-1-"'%.-'ll:.-
• 41 T f ... AA t -.•''•i• - -- ;$114444,il i•Li.. 4. It
. • • 9v,
J•ro •,. !XL. , •7...,-* t-,,,s-'i,•?(..Iii.'.;• <;•,;q•kt,,, ; LI. -,. .•4't•0'1' Vt..- -j•I:,L f;i1 .414„Iiir .,., "10'S .1%7 .4. r•--.1,,..-:::,.... ..14.tiv: - "..i. ' x 'c at.. : .. .Li . s.i-.,P- ..) ..v'.:•:..1.14;df'1-'fll....k. --,..,,...
. . .. . .
. ,..x. , .4, . -,,..-,,, •“-i'..k: ., '.' -' •t„,• is- . .,'. • . 4 4.h'i ..‘„,IP 04P,'k•A*.•; 1-,'• ,t.,,,A . i- • .4
: 4 . .. !•c r +1., d•• , .. SIVIr....E. , .....''1- .V. , f..:... ‘
' .". - - 91..-6- •L%:$i C.'.A.S`41 r'''P •• • Le,' ',..‘ .. .,-.7.4.:- •v tt,"/ T . , ,,,y. -, 1..i. v -, .-.,v T 4 p r lg.'Mr• "4 •4r,•
. . 4., .6;.....c.,, .._ ...,74.7,91.ill,...,r.';V it.....
1
;;I' ;IN4lipi jii * ..- ,....,
.. • • .... .• .- -••/,. it '?..k,,,,,c,p . ,s4.:---..'Q. '0.i.P. - ir • t -' •
'1.'LI'','/•&t. ii .-.i. t.'"•,y tit irv, .-,,,,J- _. --;„):. -:,, - ' .11.1144 t , - • :.. '''' • t.
illm IL .•to• • .•
,..lt . ........:4,_ • .N41.!,4.Ill:.'k 3:. A ,,:,,f, • t ,,• , '4 it f L.':/.-Lt. '-' ' ' 'A' - 'r - -..!'',4, 1„ r•
- '• Ar•/t4.lr;•L ." . ,-,. , •••••• . . :L., - '
'• •-• • .....1_,,,e$•iii441.. .,";',4,44,(4.i..,7,,. '„ ...N--.
.4,$Lly f olk ' •.' '. .• ., •. . .-
: ' %...;LI•otttt _..e:10;k .. • r-
'''"•T -S{A.V.-r.i.i. ' ' 1 W' %;11Ar'e.$ A rijr*,-*
I Vt • • ,fT...., . . • .
,,,,‘,.••- ,.
',;•:.'. '.-.. ".ss,;* . ..... . . 5 . •1 .
. . if-:•ky,t, . s - . • • . . .,:kfto, fly:0, ? ..„.. .. -411iYit'..
• , Ay .:: .
,'• r.- 441'i •''- . -." Ar. -a-„it',-f,'-, lt,-,. ii...t. 1.,,.
. , • . 0.1.Cr7. ,-0• •dn.,._. :-,- Ir .. . 1. . f . ,.... 4--- .....4. ..0,,,,,,,t,„,,,_,,,.,, . e.„..... ,,,,..,...-,....,
..44.i!4,3„. ,1 :
. ..il• 4
._ 7-). ' 141 . *_ r ••••,.,t „'k
•-- i• • 4 . • r • • 1 ./- .. 4
jint,_, , --‘ - ‘.4;4., 0. . 3 t,,,..g.,,,•* -0 'V 'e.• . \,110 4:,i;,,-;
',7 4 4 •- ' "'A,lit:311 -45,...1.r,e, ._ , . - . ...-!. . ilig.„
•.
....2, . , ",• .1_,-. , _ _ --- •, ' ,, .k %-1 mw.'A # k‘' . ftil.„...4•• *, 73_, .,•-,N,-; .*. -.1 $.,4.1 kV...,-) 1.4... _,
..!.•, ' " I .• -klt ..k. i,.;,'.•NO 4-'.;, .jr 'i: '
IV' '' 11711:.° • 4.17°0.44:il, „t.:-N7',',,-,4•7''..../V,0:11
' • ill' 'c_4^.. . .t. / ,•'. -:. 1.1.1.' -..! '‘.411"/ •5 lit: ','•g 1 '4"4 e .3: ti,;,- v' . '"- r''
' il$ 41 C. • rVC - 4 Ih• . '"il '•1,' ''94-"4.41's;-6.?V'*ir .Ill' r 4 . -;4 1 -4.
' • • .'4.-. ' -41' AV 4to.'J,.. ••:” •'- 4 '&4d-A . a • V4'. %La..) Yi4,N., ely f,"1.1.1.,,,k:' ,-.-•,.-AP,':... . . „ik:'• .. l'N.. 4. , ........,:ir-. *. A-4. i .i.,-('' . .. . .. it, rd. •,1p.,1 ..•-•I'''''t'
. title„A.' e4ke'r-0*".3"..1•1 1.iikki- . 4..---L'i--
.ie• •' 4 . ';• • """ ":", . .4.4,--r . •,-,‘ „,... -. ,,,....44 . .• . ,E.... 1 018'1 4..... IAA 4 4111": S 01,ft ..
. .1.1e .. 14 e E.NA....„.-.."' lot* '-It• . - . .
'‘., 41.41r- '''-.1,• 47...,.•(f +II i:95'*$y'V.'r ,,,,,,41 '1N-.1.,' .),- ''-lair
.,.,,,,.....c,.“ y‘i.14.4p,.,.;.'. ,•lc•-.z.'•:::.iii, • .,L.. • '' -'
it, • • "E,• \- -itrir . .4...-$,.ri-:$.-4,- ,...,NY Nt J-..-41.,q• La . !.% k.:...
,,,-.„5.:•..3,m4..v , .,.. • ..,1 •. . ,..•. !. . ...
1 - . lis. Iv . ''fiP•tRi:;t '",v,,g ,,vii.!fvx,t,,,.?6,HV 1! ,';?,,-;t:
p„„'5., . • .._,,,-.)::. --- it. #1,4,, .- a.- • i,-.Et v.t......itk,,:.,: .,, 4v..t.
•24. •"iii•1/47. 4i '.4 l'•N't.' • ':-.41 .-.1 t 4 t X'2'''''VtIVik-Ybi!: " ill
;') -.''4 'tin.7` , ''' *5' Ai. el• . •-
... de '01'.. di •4 s ' irbi.k. Ji.-4,8, ,-,„,..4.,, - ;.i..el,„ 'it$iitliA,,. di : ,. ..,.. .4..,
f. 41.. ,..- . ili II' 7.. k t. , _. , '-'-.. 0-, ' /.• I e. 2:*-- i .0.(4- - t ...ilso ...t.i.,„13: . ,..
•,,Nti, . .., .._ & ,, , :`,f_E..• wo,.-Cy %./4.1 e.i.,I.0 •ot
11' - V. +a ... . •.4•-r•=i-orP I-t.•Ir• .
. -
. , Pr 4: •'t'irk . ,_., %,4...it'1 q„,o,td*'Gr'' ,.11-.4,.:41.7:74.,_ •
..,.. ._,...!-..: "_,-•'if • • .i• ,_*..0" il,.."4.1...
4
.--7,•
..r.
. .0-;,.."0...A, q' • ii-4 ' Iii, .'• ',-1 . 4 i . .. • v , .0 y,i11.4 ot )..-,tv.- .. "- . ..Ar !IL)0.6..iV >ir,,,.•,,,Z %,l'Aii, .kit-•
-O. -
.1 _ , , . . ... .13,11'4 111., ei: „I'S .!liFINIL"‘$ Vill 4.1:;..Pin .•31414. :..:1
ii,„„ ...., _ l If .t ,..p.... • i';•:14.t..lt:ii "*:.• :%.,„„, .,,,-4 4 ...Lsirrl
.0'.. rr• "sd.,-,,y i ,,, 1.- f„ ir vi 1.,;.‘ •:".1.,- ..p.if.a • e....: t. .41......„,„9•it •.%.1. ."-- le
•, :_ „.4 'ALd".2.'•.t.:, 'f sq,,fix. :-..j r..,A„g.i t,iii*J.r•Wii ii„ (1;:,:!...!gag,'z•ii,!A-:4;,e ,..0.r.
--44-.... ( . ...rt.-f--..i-• ,.;..:-L i -7,4,1, 7.76 IL ire• 1 ay$: L si.„, •'fr.%.4i •.-tt••i3'4'$47/15- ';
.•• ".44444,1 d 1 ' *••
f4,4*.pp.4 Akh. i'A ' ,•:-
g ...., fm,!•Vit, .- gro 4^ ,, . , e, ...•
f
4 It
_ . ...„._.„.• .:.:;,,,,..„ ,,,, „1.;N.,„...-4 i.,.IA. .--0.,,,,k,"1„,: ,... !,.-1:,/..tke"")1*.l'i P..1:k.1.-._. P. 4 t 4);*.e,t le••‘..- • r k 4 6-Vp‘ .i r sqd7-k4fi ..4.11%11.14 V.4‘14•1.$1).,4j -
ti,,:.kiop'sr..i..•,...; .' ..Nk•P' .0 -:••• 7..94k;-0,, ,,,,: lt,;,11.1) !-it.I.- .11( tifi V .)'' .
• I 4.. .--0.. 10,. .? - , niy, •.,.'g.,.` ...s!,. , *,
•47'. 3 AY.. isc9tiiir" t., 0 4*....):', ,N.,,,,r, •x.t.. . u; o.>••$
... 'itf-h. 1 ' :ko.ovi:W.,*10:04.z.lk-,-;, '4,'%-..,,k i ' !-:-4ti 7-..-•-
, .
. - ,L... i.4 t. ffi, th .124,4,..t- •-1.,,),''cr., .4,,,..ttiti..,..v.,-,0,',',:u11..,-:_,1,-1 -...rt,:•.;--#-; A.,,,...! '4,- • l'ioeti(*;1)4-t,54-.."- - ••••• 4'ki .•'Ni i.'•I' gt.4' ,..ti',6.-,,y0..-44§,N-40 _ li) ' 4.•li.•• ..kir•, L .
fNQU1RY#:5996243.5
N •.. ._„..,„.e.V.-,ftiont‘ , ;V-%4Vot:,..4,e1,:i- -..-Iii Nykk:- J-.)-e.k-7WLIAT*4‘,1* A:. ki,,-• 4 .....- - 's-, .-r,.,...f_
- ,.., v-....24 7t? ..„1“.11,'5 L.14•...4:4.• ..Irk. ,...„ OA .r 4.....t..11....114.4e I.• • 0. 4 e, t.• •i j.I. Oil..
44; i'-` •4'-e•'•04 *4',Stf,.,t14 Skv'•'••` •?0*-•*4.,• • * .•'' *t. '4 - •,"t -...
YEAR: 2012 .e.,•,/;itrii...i_szt,A-104,.6.,.....4'01, ' 4 c• .:, -N...•AL..,i irt:•ei.f-,tt.,..t.,.. ii-i-tuSio....- -_. •v...„.4•61,,,ra, ,
• ..444 .',.).5-1r.•.:„--4.•.•.1::,I.q-':-A,Iy*:Loks,"u;'.'• '' .41,,t4A,_,41'7 l'?„.• ,,„,t.s. t:ne,•;.C. •CE DR .ilik' :„,"'I 44:10; c -':1-:!--:.':t.:Y .';- 7-.? -%,.'".it--,i•lx16.IL, 4t5-6-44:t-Nit.ti; * ,nr...,..X•R"6! . VA.- -•.• -.`.1
-500' .-.• * "'o•'-v.•%,•••-,..• - •.5. ..E. ••!....4. L. ',.t t.- •.z..,,••t..,.... „ •.; . • . „ ..

. .,
---..•. ...
r • .1::,:i - 1-. " - - - • • - , r
J • - . .- ' •' - r--' - . ..• • .
. _ ..... . , . _. . .... .... . z.....-•,,.r---.... ..:..t,•-"",n-. .----""....i.,..••••?,.i.- ••-%- - • lg.,4744''t.eit.." 31.- , -
' . ..-.IP*....-.-.-Z.,.Z-,.....'A.:-..... -'I:..4. .-- 4 ' . .....2•••jr. .4.-.,.0.,„ .....,..., - „4..„4.; ...-z.l.p,5 ; 4,/- - 'L.:4.-. • • ....,,cr,40,.,0,-•-,-....-...,-,,. .-.s..„.
,- - - • •
. :- - / 4. • ,, ...-7•0_,..f.`i,Vit.'-', ••'• X--ilis r.'isr: .„...----'''''....0'. - L' / . '17°`tr-•;;Zeillit7;:- . - .-.;-.:- ,. .. -I.-
>.
-",..•• ,-.:-4./ -::-:,'...,'.;. ' )..1•"#-,-4::::r-•.-- 'iv.-v...-. '-`-k . r 11-fitiL- • ' f'11, ''t:"-•- ''.- - .r"" ' . -,., - .. . .
•
--',"1• --..,1W •N;•ja , .." "•IT'''' ' ;- -: ..-'-':,,-4.-' 411.-' '-r.•1••*41'‘'. •: --"'1,4-V-• - .. ,;.-"' • ." r• ''.- .'"- -- .., -
• • ;#0-c, . ,41,›.-.., r. ... •- _,- , . % . •.• ..,,tAr,...-' .yi....- 4., 'I- ';'''rae,,,._.,-i, .„r. - •• .....,.t. - .---(„) -,.-:- -
,k..-„,.......-•.4.4,..., , .: 4._-. „.-......:7..-....„.„1. -_•.:,_, ,,-....:.. - - .,Z1f111, ...,...^..9. . '. .-"-.
P-...'Ejf‘k<41•RIA• • ' -..' '. 1... .. Pfe e.- •4q' ;, •' -' '-4.1E...?-. - `---.! - .-, • •....k.•;-.` .-.'-- •-.;1•••--- .r-' '
-
, '':1/4-1;:-At"-'•2;i-?,-..-n-•-..:•.••••,44 reyie•-,-.-..t. " 7 eeP -'.-,fi.,.•- --etr''''',•$. -..• wie-cfka:qr7-, •-..4.}-•-la ''',.ik i •-:A-4.' -'-' '4,7"401W:i.0-1-:..1:7'41?."."-V- -
..- $.--- : .• -.-. 4...0,,,..4.-Irrf„.--•al • -'44.7.7.....r. -' . -44' ....-t-:., -• 4.--"-ir''''' i7iipilik. :;.1....'.:•"..-.'••,,,
- -.s.ei 4 ile.,r•,..,, '1) 4...ceik.- I' _31.74"'I,- - .r.4";i5171,._••‘...5.-.4.1P.-4..,?;;;Kreirtgimip..t.z.Z.0••:- .• . _e. 7 .r. ',..IrtAte.„•' •... ....,,,,, ...-- ''''':-4..--.V..-. -...N..': •..• . _S•.57.•'7-,,,,. • ._ "r.•. -•-•-0,-;•-ei ,- -04r.•••••---74-',..w)-•,.•#.4,0.-: ' -- . 'V.,or'IA"''''' .,'"- .--ft-
,--' -.; , '41 -'s-0*--,V- .or_:'-i..-._7.••• -.- • ...!. -. ...;„ -1--;„,...w- -----.111kyrpt` ----I---to,.i.• 1---_ • .-..4.,oi,,.."•-•-...;, ..e.c!....--_,"
- -• --•-•- . 4.,.--,.-4,,, L- .?,•-•-,,,,,,Prat. -._-.„.,,v-.7.,_,,,,. , -::..-. -,-;,.....,,,,.--- -.1.--Sgt'..-"r- ,..(--„p - .".)• ' . .'W;eles-s& '-.1 'd(.4r..,AP-'4.
,,,,......414...,
•,,,,, _... „,..„......_.„,,,_iri..: .........., 4,.... . . . :. _ a•••tr-•••••...•-•-lipt-r.,.•-•:7- ''''..00- --t- 04111/`‘•••1.- •
. `:-.'• -'••:'-'•- ra...-.r.-:-4,--..---'f.4•••:‘,- .7..i.n., •.- .=--.a•A•.---7•X`;'• "'Alt r..-4.-•'•-•-•11.".. -. .- - ` .*P.'''' •• ">- • . - .71;44.fc. • - ‘ •14,-•••` /-
- „lie 4•3 ,-......4,. _ • ,i.r-...-
. '!"4•44.;,4-pyy:•'-e---.4.•••••(-_-•:i.id-,i'''•''‘I- t 4:-.-',..,;;;P:s- •-..;.4 -;_!,'7.-:71`1E3' cov4.7i44..:' -'Irs-' •-•-;('- tb---• . ''-: ..i . ' -- 0-4-'.- :Pr .1. •-. - 1
1-,L7:-;t4•3-*,,i,t4 ,'... '''N.:.a_.-- 41)CYZ1.14=-4,----.14.1•r7,---'' r liti:r'1;:t'..."-''ti-r..•,-.rh.-fl:ertr..•7'7' P:I.r'...74,_::.I'L.'-PV'''.; P'Ortr‘?.• - 4.1)Prr.0--4 1Pit-AOLT'rr '.4,1'.Ar. 'Pe..'IP
,4.6•=•:.411.;... .-'. i't '..7%.- -4:(w..r:'''-- . --'7it,P•ii,•::fi'••.e.' '''''....:. ii.P. ,-..1E- 4••v,:.,-ii.•,.!•L-.•, :4 4'.-1.-..- -.. _ .. :4•, _ 9..dit , ,....0".. ... ,,e4g.,.;.. -••44-pg.' ' - ''. ' 1•-.-'1'. fr-,..!...'-t;`--•,. -•,''-'., ..17''- !Fry--' IS. 4:,- • .t•.--.. t:.'' i a. • ' V.:7-..,.;, -..-v --44ri,•.. --L.*- ip.„-
• rwo '.t.NK-T-•'_.., Atc ''''' ' .., -'.. ..---' :'''-. 'I' '-.,..-41,•-, -:r-...,.7.--.1. . c:..4 ..:---= - ,..,•,.1,-..-s'..,....- 4.*-,:-..:•,,.,.. -..•,` ::.. .!.,. . - •
4TA....e. -a-fir,47., k",.•55i.......-•C ..- . -- L'* ' -L. 'L.:_.',-....-..:t 4.-i'f.-- -..--L -''- - .''.-. li.‘v, ......- ' v--..ft-i;;;'7L'Ll- - .-V.. .'.-.-9'76,„"....0,
*,•- r '51, ' ill-65..7- -.7-• ',eq..• -V •...cop. -- •• a.
;..' ...'".. -Z• --, - ..: - .4* -' -414eCikt-. . ..."1- •' - - V ..:,,.. ,-;-%- .4t --A 7 . --
- '2 5 'N'at.j• ';',I#14--• .. - ' - -3,<- ' -5--••!••,..,.." -4.4 •,,,,.f' - ' - --.-4.-'•-$4,k%41':-7- •-, .-.- .'-% '-'••-s7 - ••1;Vv.', F-01
-5.
1.!..... - -.. 4.7,4--.Li., ). - Not,. -,.... .. IA IA .-rii ';'.•-• - - k 0:0.e • . .••-. ' P A
- •• '' t.--P , •••'.': '• j-l'As 4.P. '. t r ,-..r. L• . ' p _...-. 7
;--4,,,-% r. -4•• . ' - r _j, , ..„. . iiig" :-.• - _.--47r- . ,• -‘7.4.t.„--q.-- ,„ it- 'A.'
qk . •__--.......• .- 1.. .y..;1',"1. :,,10.
..... 'Nsp:
....-: 4. - ..- • .‘•
- -.• ----'. '4,-;ork,..:- 'eri. . Nk2 --,...z,.....,,A, _. _ • _.. „. _, ..?..,.. ''' 044: .:I ."- .
---' 'w-Apt -••- -•-- 4:... -4.. ... •
. ipj....x.: :• •
+sr .1i. -.A1.414-'.Ire;••••:. 9.6 ., .. .1••-•11.. .„,e-::
.-::•:44 x-t.*-,..„ _t.,.Ne+I I r.97ii-4'V• -_ ,.. g.L..._1';,1 r- ,' ,..,.. . .
N
1
• •14 / ft•'-' ' '''s• ' 7,.: -fr ..ikiles'-0*- •-k(o• .4'l'L ••:;:',la,.- ,.- vb. .• r".- • ' ' '" • -.L. . •tAiril•*-'00P-*t 4..rii .-fer:•r
-;;•,•*•_74!„,..M:W.•-.1. . la-iw'- ...r.„_'-'1. -.... ""e.....
. _- ' •••iler4if f ._-; le VE*-.1.
--.fir•_7z. .,7 L.-, . ..314. ,:.„....,--,.... . r.,?" ..... ii.-r. - .i.r.-r'4-0.r 4.. -,'-* •:.'rtx-r=-L--ki--.
-...t.....5u-,.... ?...,. -..,.. '''tf•t'• -'-•-".- rv."-"- '' • ''14,-' . "'"`.
„. r. - - r....+ - P••• , .- - . A , .c.-4 •-f. *AC r4 ._ 'A( - -,.i,,,,,- ,.r.,-.. .e,t. !
ioirrIlitaitie ..•.•....2.6.4-'14 - ,..-p,-..ete.,, priL _p•-i..,N-.;...... "rb,.../.,...PV'', .--11
' : ' 4,- -.'f'-%•%';i.e' ''''• r- j!flit-4.•-•--"1- -•'.",.-:-00'' ..., I-i 1",,-;"•,,.* `• _ff.
.. ."--.. .'•*- •..7-' _Ls. ' -.,.01,4_,CV;...-:=‘;'_- _211.1.'.--',.,:iiti : • --.- _
•,••:.z?'...-'7.s_,..-- .1"--..f-'t -: . -- r''''42c,-.-v. - '' -ii .-",:',.:•-• . _ . . w•P::: 4 . ir .,- I/7.- '4•'31640-
- • - .1F, : -
e-1:15- -., • - r, - •-
._.-,•„ r_s...175 I, '..- _g..,.; vr_....;4''..4. :,..,.. 1 -... .pw N.,... I. - - - - v--' '' - ... " .--.44. - r:,-.>
=, _.. 1''''' '5'10‘,0("1".:'-,Zi;r:?. ...,'%,-.'r•••--.•:-':-:-'.- - ., ki:t' ' ?C'-'-.L. .....----fre.•"t;-'.?"
i•;..• , , 1.-.,-'4'--• .4 l=• - -
+1' ,A,ill3S4.-::',, ',. '::: •iilt-- • -,.-44-t
AK' - . • . t -:- -it.: • • :'' - ,.. ,..tfr.-r 7
'...•?. -p.,,.. '-',...,,. -7_9,4..,-, ,...z• .
-lot, ,.. ' i',: - r-',if,2r._,1-: .-Cf•ff-4..e.r.,4414it_d_z_it ,..::..,
-..--.. .e.,-___.--••,.._,-,i,;.--t..6, ---. :P.',._ ,_ ,. - -._ • _- -.!... .-e.
tr.
. .
, .. •.._. ...7.4.07 • . - - ,..."-,..,-..v.,:r--1-1.1;.',e6-f2„.„-,, ,,,;si-t_Ti?,.tfi...,,,,,--ip-,-;.. •!.
--
-.-.
•i - 445.7; 'jr'A,' ' •‘•',... A.'4- -. '4•.:-.!-•;-...,:-"4-..f.2.•:-.• ,,,
II\ IP- - sip.V., .. -C-4/..ff..4 7---.&,:jtle7 -".„-r.,..::-2. ,...;..4.'n.r.,' `,..• . r
'
- -4 -...- 4.•
..,-.... ..,,.. - - - -1--4-- -....-4--•-,,L.'•,-.-1441.....-..... .•••,:-
. ...-‘• •-•'''',W'ti'L‘ kr..... K,-N.- 4.-,▪ 4- ' ,.
,.........', -
-, s-.4r'fi: ,•,.., .-!•,....-gtir .Le--.' 07-,i,-L. .. - 44!...-..,“ ...,-...
L .• ..,...,.......- ..--,,,,,„ A-..1/4_4(....5,. ......;,. _....,ig...,-;.. ..1'
Ayr -,.. , „... -;:rwcii. v.?.• , ,r...*.7;••••:. -.ft. ,, ,,„..
' LP-.. "..!-, •P*Ld.-•' .01E' ......„. - 4.-:4- -^'..r.. - Aie
!JP .. 4 ...."- ..-.• `-.6,411*-"...c.'N"A...,......r. .._ .„• :4..t.,.... -,... 4,4 t...
--. •,.
-4-1C.--tP'.:.-•11VIP.-.'..-;Yr- :4P...A r•• ` ' t- ".41.- ,- ....41C-.. ;.-.20'..-1.7. - ..... _ ,..••',,-.-'.- 71•...,,'.....,.•-‘..._-4..- ?'...-Ve.
•4" ' '-• • ' -1t-.4-- ..-e•-r_--- --. .- -0, el- t4r-'. • '''ifIrri.-- '1__-_,'''''.."'4 . ---
,.. ...
•-. -•1 . ...,%;1;4:"...;.k.----..re,--- • . 04, -...t14.....-.„,..- -- ••••..i..-147,;-•,-` • ,- -11••-'• ,,:'7--4:.'
4., „k. ....-44.,,..,......•4.--,:f.;:x.., ..-i-. -,---- :.,...,„ ", f-- .
•„,„,..,, .,,..._.,. „:-
,.- ..-....- w 4,7-;.;- -...:, - -- *.-,,osk,:,e.. .':- `' '•-----.' '•
. (,....Y" 1: .P%1011t
...* ,_ •L. , ' - •;•,..;:- . NI' -.. •••-•,,e1-... •-%.-„L,..77--' .'• • r : --,
+.-tr.....%,..,0.4-...,,• ' .ort..,. r. , ,ii.,r01,,,,:,..,..,,,,,
-. ,. •'-- -44. ''....7- .. • '..-'L.l'i-:*•••:.k•. .: r•
,. 161441011tv:L - • . ..;.. x . ,*WO"'-__--" .-n--2.' . rP. ..t'•-*„.11._.ar --• - • -r fr..Inovi„?.-t''• . .
-:- • '• -1". • •i:-.. _ -,..- 401 '-..,..',4kr ,.,;,r,----•-k44F-440. %'n _ --... _. -
%.,•-- .• 1
-- ,
• i,"•.,44 - : '--- - --:- - . ..-.7 r'• . . ,y,,,,__ -...e:.1 er-r, ,. , **4••• --..). lk,..,.,*` -' f
- l'e•-,.- , , , , dese? , r
'' u4.111111t„ ..-%010.
'1:--...• ',its....,,,e 7:4-- `1'•..-"-' -- - ''•
. . '. 1.4' -•
.• 41...1W-•.„ rVE I .:'/Illigi".. .:- ''4( -ki...,' it -d--
.. . , - oi • - - '•4"1- tri ••,. ,.._ . _..
.r...,,,t
,... • ---... f.. ..-4K.---._,....,.., . 4.., . . •
?... . • . 1. .' 4 „ .Ivi. ..„.1.7 ..' . ,.
. .
„ - .,jr. .,L. 4• T I.-. . -,...'4
."- •,-=. 1•Z•110.ej j'A.04 ...j6l.' 4...... 1)14 .
_t.....;.;.,. : ' . . '........- ikliti'•.;,74;,r-..,:r P •*A..01 . • -.1 e .4.V,Vr.7:17P-.660.r • : fr.. : 'a4( -
• . -A' .... •-•-- -Te.-ri41.-_-- z• 1 ,..-••••;..f. ..t./.0;$.- ,._ ... ID,L. it, - .--- ' " er• . •-e-tar ',.... .4--4 "•• 'e• •
r. ‘Vr::.4,... 'L r A..L... ---7= , - ''--• 17-•-‘4-t• -• 1.a. Nii... - 1. , . .e.A......./. - 4. . i. 1-,• . ....„. ...T ,
. .• -
. ,_. . - .. ..„ ,,, ,, , ... . , ilior,V;t..7., t i -, le .. . lf, . . .. ... ._ .. • . ,Itt_....11W..•-
'atie„ ' 7- -7e0.-''',-;... - 1-.•. _ ....--.T ••••-. .. .eri- _- : .";,-;..ef. .,i,...;7 -,e --...,.___41,.
1"1-00.mc • - ' •,,LA''-- -'r' - .-41.--17-' ' ' :- -1' "gc.:' irr *!51.- 44--,-..' - 'v,,...• • . ,•i. ,.. - A
No.- ' -,77-ipo -',=•---:- _,4,..1.-:,..e-- ,. _- ' ' 1'4' - ,,..,,t y_. ; ; x i--:-..--,-- _z:-1-"•;Ift, -4..:..-
.
- • • . . -
-.... / 'k.-: '14. :,-.•,Ik•..."lb.- ,,11111,N11,,_.';.-- ve/h..- . .,,•bk ,A , , - 41--,
':-PrA-i - '•-i''' -41
.- 11 c-r - v. . .-. r., -‘,••4.-.. ..1:,,,A.7.7............T.A.,41..r..."..„...t,” :-•-• ..• ille p-.iift-,;.•_: - •fp*:P•
• ..• I' 7 _. ,_...a.,r,, . . -
._ _. .
PI '1'' 'L.*, * • --.z•. ;1-jr...01,feq;,,::-.. • ' = .- ..,_*",.a"72.-:- -; ,_
__,. _. - _.,.."4-.„•.,..,1•-,..-, -".'-• .4,,,1•,'• ''
/. ; .---, 11•4 y el..4k -.-Arottx4-
;., acq..,;-,:c„t.7 _ -.a.:7> • • .._._,..trif.;_i. r-r--ror-g--..,- ...t.,.,..,,,Iir.i;tar
- - !
.N.-...earr„/„.4- ... -,41.'...-.0- ,. •., „-,
..,-1- : / '' tMitrif...•' tt irOi:A. .:•-r:.J.-• ' --_,"-- • .. ,..e..4,gv k - b
. .
_ r ..,-,•-• .. • - ber 71a{ ;t;;Ir'':ait ''..• (:.*„.4,17-ti..4 '‘,..4.,:. -' •'r;1.44. • -•-•_• .'" - ''.. : 9 .-' '•'.ak ... VC 4T ,.}., *.
-0 • 0%. s. .•'-- .,./61- ..r.• ' 1. •.. di,454 t ,#r.4 . -4.Mt I
.14i4 ... .: "-• 1.074'••:'_Atio...4.1jetr4 ./.1'
• . • • . - '
a -. ,dip iv- '-1,-.t
_ ,-•••4 . .:. . • - 4 ,,-;- 1 1.1014-
L. -- ....1.,t,- •,-.-.. • . &AKA... ...I.... ,._...• :ig... ; r • • . ..r.
. ., ; ,'rod*-- ',. _.it 4.414.1,41 6.4....?44-„swile-01 •,-;
i.1$1*.t4Lifer - - •. -'lv -440...- L. - •
'.;. 4- +.. •4'.• .A•4:4 ,.1 r P.• ' -. , • ir'i • ,- .4•11.1• re9 1451.714:•-ilW..rdv".1
1--... - •.20° .- tr--/3-7:-•',..-,i:,-- -''' --yr..., it. 44-• try ...7 A1114.•.la- ,, 4,y,4-4,..- 4" _'• ar.„....-P'" !: .." ',. : - .t •rd,i, .4' - .
• ,r• .'4.04.,:r r,--.4... .••.•-•" ,,_.--eti./.1.4..16 ;_x_.-."-A
J '-lb " .S.:' L-I...4--- -- . "IL: .---- • -4104.011•-•• 4 471-"e: _LW 4-1,s :, ,
c ..atir,l- fc- Av.: ...-,„r"'„-1.t•-• :, 7 .:.-' ,...- ' ' ei - ,:,-,,,•_-- ' ...i. •.- i•V' '...,_.44,55*=44147-k-
..-4'.''L -r-'"--4. '
..ell :110. ,....,• ::, -.1. ..,.,.. • ., i„...4,14.-...,-;.-46:-;-..'.1,-":1.1"7-""t., 1. VI!.:4142.;,/./M-41K 1.?'..
- - -.1--..,.fes;-q L•- 4.'- ' - ' -- k 1-.1 r , .
..- -. - •
.;,. :• '"I.P 114$61 . .' IP r,i,''4F; ' n.• ‘-r i r..1..-". 'A'....".'-r.-. c 4 14%4. A rtrY•r'.4t.Z4N1117 -
-• J 4 ".,..,,. , . P P_, . _ yai. •:".,- ' ,nit , •.._.,+.•... . 0-elf.'
1 0,.
..t. - . -: . -.. ..
Le424, „ -;-v- r ' ':" -•N-- Cr:- 4.,.$7;.,4,,,,,...e'LL • • ._ ;1'4 ,,,A, -- 1.,,,„4. ii•--if -
•--,i
i t
i, N , . _,..... .1,,,,,.„.- ,-:-
YEAR 2009
fNQUIRY#:5996243.5
•-•'<ii4L,_/1^0......,--4„,;•7-...st, r...4. '' - -. ,-- qPF-A R.'•11 ji!.... ..• ..... . j142_,.140• •ii _r:Ild'ilWr- r0'..
?.......4C"- ....':-P,..•-r•P' • AA. -eV .." 9 i....pt..,,, ..,_,....-.7 -,,,-4,00X_ -.0-
4••••1-..4.75.--ritrur -'1'4,1-.t.r.'''- ......".• ••;...-7-.11,-. 1.......;-01-;-f. .ry...._-„_•,: --g., ,-,,, 4 40...A er ai Il.1 .1:1.••
: - • , `. - -.,-"i:-:--i;f-j ,e...--,e 'el'T.=-f:; . - .D-."'" . ' .., --.., .....a--; ., cp. 4'
-r- .:, F,•. .)4 .-1.P',..,.dit;ilk - -.17, ....cgie-4•tW."‘-'7_ ., •tr rAt .I 37.- " I't, ,-.' ---7..?4,.- 4-.4r'-,0`. .'Al--6-1,,• -- ''...•'-
I =500 E DR Nr 1 •••.-2,:.-'5', -..prry-'),..:gL7ke:4-:,!-,:,-.1.77^e-tfr.,••••is!L:,,-.A. ce-,- . • .,;....4,;;:r-Irltitz. ' 'Y f R_'•- •, PO,-.):',.f.....3
'
_ ir:7-Pr,„x./..,•c•sr-or-7:•:.-1.-A.--1 A-1,5--..1„'.9-, .

. a r-" - 4 l'IV-- 'r rN,r.ik• t-• ii.rP 4:' ' 1.A:‘ i•-•
r-..,.-i ,......f,', 1.- .„,,,,I.A.'• ',,•,..i.v: • ..;4:-;.,•'!'41:: .. I *It 4, '..1 . ''... ' f 7-I" a,- 1 '"'i VI'. iv 1•:4'..:7'40! .. ...."1 ' fit •tilf1V.Y.*i 6P: `i -6%.1•117,1- •ir:ilicro 4 ,e If riri--',l';•larl % P.-4 I' ,..; ', . Ir.A• oat . 9,,•1. ! •; • ti-' ' .11.:ddi'. 10 .a p,11,..... 4',.i.',.'.to„.. .p•ie„ to.
..4• 'r•4,gt -d"P-i'ail''!1 .' •; ..y,..-4..1. . tt.. - Alk .1.1.?`-' 4-- r • - •. r,,,, -f.• .- :..." ,s Fir !..A. •r, •-'1--0.-,-I,V,e-1-'1,P-i
:Pi: • j.)',20':it,'04r,rihst..t,' -: .., -060: 1-R :4 ..ts', - ,,-"°4 -4‘:- -, ' ,-., i, i. 4. f ,'", 4,40;e:ipkto...'1-•13 t• •.,i'.,7 0 -,; ''' :-'
,
vlii
'.,df i 7 5/t.",410;:. '.; . igi94-" 'Ic.t•-•*,1,1:-,0 4 :i1.1'et,A1.1ne",j1:;',-k,..- ':3'.‘ 10",, .41",e'ol.f_ .&„ --,„ .t.. '.,,*-,.%;L..3.•;:.•.i.,.,•,14 a -
,
4,,,,„•fi''.'.,. • - .5.).-: - ..•• it ..!.„4111 -4, 4.4t61, "or-: ••i•7 .11y..-1,/: ,, ..g- 1'T f-Afk-- '-'ii;•' '-*Cop"e :'.irte-r• • ! .:::!,•••?..,,,.i.t'., ,..•••, •,,,,..• 4,...,-4. . .1,.-, 1 y ., do;„.•„",, _f, • .Ls. . ,4..:11- ,. ......, 1,0.....,,..._.-...
if .60k),_.6.•. ' .,.,..r e i';: :=.• jr „vs-pi. - -_,.:!,.* st,die .ii.--.•d.. .•,•f. ,, `:4;A: .p 4. I 51.if: • • 'V ' ' .'''', , '-'; '-J:'4 r r-.16 ;144 • - ..i'''b :lt ; :, , ;0-. ... ..„ ,,‘ , ,,, .-..,,,,...7,,,, . . , 4:-. or: ,.03.,.... 4„,$.:,.- ., ,0
t
„,. *
• '1•.•.0. 'cr. v.t ' - ti, / .7 •-•'-.J.6.• ,,, . .•,....Vt 4 , .,. ! •. .,„?.:;.1a,r.f.
. ''.;c r P e. Vi", . .... 0-.. •0 ' .80,-.,14, .,f• IV '... el •..tY d'. .0 •LF, i... 1•.' - ' 0% r • . 4 •' -'' ri.t .f.,e
.. ,• .4•I•.
• ..•oter ; . ' ':, 4 , 0.r., . ....e , % _ ,,f,e% ,1!' - i '. ':i•I, -C •
i . ... ,.. ...."•Y 141.4r : , 4 ..i. ' '
i t ;. - 'n-.4.- •' -e. ;II . .•• ... .);•.N. . 1 4' ^' fi-• • -" -• a. ...;ts:,,;.;,
„,,, .-. , _. .., - fir lir
r. 4•- ic ri -r•.011-e.' '1 f--,..*,
• 1•,- .. ••• . .. •!•• . 60.•
Ci- '• 0 • - .• • ' it 4a:I.1.ftt• I .. .. '. :fr..' •,i ''..4:•.. 6 .:4- •-e- 'I• .,,.r-j•et•,r4..1 1,7r .•. i ,. •.„, . 4
.pitriL i•.,'; l ...g• ' 1-..r14fli,.: A 1:4 . 'f-ir,./p. :,ietr . I .1.f,t'! :. -.g -. r - :11 6.•f•,:r.46' r';'•i_i7V1 :;e4 r.6,- -6,;44•114- P
ir' ...,r 'sji.rr"--.7 ...i-ii• i•o:Pa.„,•H'44. - ..„ •P••14 • "/ • A...ph-,..4110....., .._ 41_,..4.„ a • ...,,:,...., , , .2..;;,,..4 1..../.,....-71; A.0....iir....4.......ro..,s ,
)ell • 51. 4 .ri.e.. ,4 - ,,.?II.. ti. •x;ik.4.-tr:...•..,:r.t.i.4,,.-ii.r,..1, , ., . . , ,. • -. - • • -.. e.i.v:,i,ple..„.21%4•,.„11, ,. ., •
• .4.,4• ''d ji 4. Sr-' •• ' -
' 1,...If • 4. - .11 .'lir,: - i•''.;'' /4.7- • '; t-'"i" .'.. .ilf.: i; ip....:.... '5%li'l tri7„ii) ..47' ••• ;4.117.-P."}:.
.if' •
iiplc.1‘
- •1" • ;-. k ".' . -'- . 4 ' ..dj - -s. l r 4, r-f. ;.2j` _11,40 1•1 g ;
' 11,CV: ' .,!'-.. Iklii 1 P 1. 111 . a P6, . 16.•I `:
P) 04.• -% $.1, .-;;. J 7. =: '7„.-:.;$' ' t f
-IV 1 ' '. 41 •s ... 11.. irk, " •4 fY44° -:a :.'
..... r'...qviy sjr.,,,i,/, 14.. • it.,..... . - 1 ,,..1 i -• , .-' ... .-1- 4 . • 1,,:,1,1.• t le I Si)• 6 • ' r
. , i oriaily.Api 4/„.4.•A- •,4-7,-• !ill. r ‘ i.•• .4?..7 i i' ".
1 ft 4'1;4 .
i
. .- • ei. 1'' .4,
.. 46. '14 L'••iP -.../AVI ,..b... , :19.1`sei.,'. ''
i• .... - ... .0.
....?1., • .e.
i.:Z-i,t. t >.' '..).. - 7 -....." !rig „ ..),-.., . ...,•„.• •,L, : •
• "5„:1:7 7 JP,er,.• ir•- -61. ....• "4 4-4,..... .'41 . • y-'1..%1114 it.'4.''.• .. .r%S. .4 ell s• ai t /"..*:,...-i.,..t"/ :: .•':,•"I , , . • - I et 1.. °..A... ' ?.1.",fi 1 -1! r. . 1 . •
fi4114.,•a• 2. ' 111 iliP,lir,:,fr. • , ,r .Tr-4111; ,., ,..i' -: . e, - 2.7*.t.. • •-.1i i' ,.,t.. •.ir I y I -At.'"if'..,"!4,i.•
t ,i,,. . iiir42 iiii,ic.of',"i ,• ,. Ali ., .'/ .";.•IY.'•1 . ii • - -o' 7i';' '.e),, Z'or..;'.V.
4. • , 'ie. : *. ...,; 0,0 s jrA.,' ,, k ,. , 1 •,'.. ;A-r'' Ff. - -1 :-.1 4.7!...- -.r. sly'lCo II pil 7'1,'•''...t.41.11.' r
e
...., , ,,..1 Aa -4 ,c,•1,1,,1*. 4*ipr Ari. . fi r
1., ...; - . ' .r.• '• • ofg 4,r:.11-7,..."- .1111 ' . •''sk, '''; ..... ' .;:"i:':.'irj:'.);-.1.;.::14•4''11. :::.(1!Ii.:;147,,47::•1-11
i it.. . ..•a'i' it, .,If• ...#-4d... ...7...! SI ...% ...,, ••lin'';_y.tr ''',.ti,.40411,- .. •• iy•...1. •I., A%.„‘„ ..0 siftecf,i "i
4111-... •s,.' ' .. v p kali-F.7a: 0,10.1,-w .7..., • •,•.%- r .1.1 ! A., •,r, ....-:.,;„,....• 4 ; ,- , ,
• '. .P•ittf- 1,1r .4:#P',01ifil'aar •4**,cra.1.vj'f),.14 - . • •Ak. _I W.: • , 1,.. y• . • , r f.d ) ."
IX 411 / 4 • 'la age,.j ,r•"L',,-1:'?
1.01.
- - - ye. .1 . • J-./...e,.. ••.•:......c.. ... ,s, .•.
'. - -# ''-• 1,14.;'#.•tr•Jo:, dfir",-.,ii,.''.4s '-'''.1.:fi:._
' ....e.d,..,:r.,..v .4 ..' p•ofjoi.i.: ; t• l':,,.,to.).7v14%* ' '..' ..f_ '..-0. - 4,1p) le;'''' 1"it:AVO1,14..4tipfie':--11',$
., ..• . '.iit'.':!. ,..", i„' -'4"4/1,3" t6 . . - .7,1„1,1;3b; ... ,.,, _ . . , ; „..i..7... ,,, . • .,, .......'2 j., 1.'? r A- ,i. -.••
b, , i „•.. i .• af , .. .
14., ." .....ei '-':zig lit ti.,r.•%-f. 4.te:iil .A.v•-;:ri,t $.;.
P.I .1,::•.. '. ,v,,.-ril;'itrjr)..-1.ii4.0;,-4 rio,:i I ri,,,t41,3: a, .. w. . • ,,....,.. .. 1,,,,,..• k 1 4.fyli(4 a -,... .71•
. f ,
•ir Le.., . fr..„,P. Lifr ' r c.....6 k r.1. ,. Ir.' • . Ili , ,e4" . i -- ',v.---4. . 0...*,..i.'!,! . ...),1, -___,.- . ., .4..:.. 1 i:,•v'':14 b, ,.•9 _fr. •:wi,4 , , -,,.. ,.. ..„ Jr.'a:,.IC,:, 1,41:tvit -.•"4.1,107. , z 4,:,4, ',_,,,--
4 0. --- 4.0- ' • • 1irit .. . ... ( i . -‘,. Ne," ( - . - •
WS% 4.'" 'il ' 1 :It „*,..:1)''.4E' . .1 J.;;',-•.44`,,V•••iri r,ie 7
, • 4.'.• •OrA .' -.
:.. 1 4V ...3 .!.''' P'11.1'' 'Ot.5 :4;ei;e/i•LP .1-t -dr .....0 .....i.....° ' .11',I
.1 Ni;i, t st., •:,ti:.14 1,,,0107., •••.4'. -r:1;;-. ' . ilit'- 41-44111.-‘ ..t>:: r . r• _.• , ,aa„, ..,. ...... . iti.. . .t., ,
%•Ak! rr i•••"rt. './Iirr•:';‘‘,14X')14'ari44P• ...).1i?; !.St . • 111.7"Ir're ' ' ...\
itiOt
I/ 11 it -' 011 -.. .-•,' " . i•-•;.•• I) .e.14„
•
.
•Ail.fijg
... ,..k.. -... ....t,./:...!....i'.57.11...e....).;:,..).4 ilfr.::.1,:iii • 4 •• ........: 2 4,1•0, .4 . ry
ii. 4 lit r "41 ' Is-' l' ,t• --.. - .. fit : isl'' -•flt•'6-,Allei,v- 0 . 11 ii ' ' "I‘b "I‘ 1' .11 I i 1 '' ' 41i‘ a % t. .t,..._ • ...'. . (.1-
.>11,•*.:', .•-, r , -7..k. ., • ,,.....,...;" lit•• •,:f.ir e." g... ,.•
'fr „16' .6, • 1 or, .4,e7 hiy, ^41. . re . .1J '
i
• -A: - 4 sr r - -I.
.,- •
W'"„r, „'W./ r%Pr-4.9 Y• - f,..1.
' . "Tii ' .4.r.r •-•'-i,...,-'.fr",'te ..... * . % A. i
iii 1.<1•••-,• -' . _ . , !...ttrii 5',' .$. .•:.:„ sit ; .t:Ilt .4k'
.4 i, .1):6 -r` g •4 ' N, .- 4/ •.•..1•.'''- I-' .j ' fi:?=1-ri,v.•?
f- ?.: el.t•• ,i.y ,. i
-Ler 0 •4 - -
A - fi.! 4::... ..!.. le- - 4 - t.._ ,.• k . :. % .1'.-... ''. 1:j•• .• '? 1'.1' - .:'
' .11 1 . ' .'" '3 ',• .,•' ,-. • ..'', ..tr 47...; .4 . v,
441.*' i;• ° Utl%' - f . .....„.. IA •1-- 4 ...'.." 2.• t ,.'• et:4, %.:' i
141#4:•••4. 1 ..r II, a:4' -'. "Pf: ,, • Is ?..,..4%_.,.3!".A.,_ .
41 ' i• ....,..i. „... ade-fr,• ,,,, -......, •,..., ,.. . , .. ,..•-i.,,.1 , ..,
o a, . 3 . . _ • 'ft* ' . .Vtii5*:- IP, 1 V' .•41/
ifAit/ .1 :i.irfi.",.'6.;oi - .• • .,,:, .•.('.. ,....., ''....0:1'. J7.:t ? ,,,,
•..'".1..1:Itz:.11 t.:*•. ...e...,..,;',•1:4 t T.::., . -...i..- ,• 1 I r .•
il " 44 ---
Iltp . rif., It. ., lb-4* • 'r.,,t i,...,.. F. _04.-' ..-4- ,. , s. . r :f1 ' .1 • . - 4. r f:I j?ik' . ''','r• I•r" ''''
e 4 1;7 1
• tr•-•.1.: .':1;:.;.-4..;.'":#4'45.1te Sl'aff:• : .... .1' ' '1' .;- 1
•.1 4).j''P•ft ,2011 ,,•• ....• • • .i,..
...... •• r•,I .A , :
.j it1.1. i :4.. •• le:A.4'2,7'.4' '. VAA, A ••
,Ifp•ortill; i , -.N1-1. -r : ..,.d., ,.1.; ; ..}/ (::;•."•"..,,, ),- ', , . -'
4,- r.
C.•-•;'1-1.1e It ;- Al *".titl 1 -
• . .11 fir 4 '. rICAlt i ''.'' 0 • .I:. - ' - ''"•' 1.
.? A. . . . . . i .;.... - •J`4. ;:%1 ie '',1"-Lt.',..4:'•.t.
Afi ' ' • ' ‘.""14Vir-fi-.' '
1 ''''' ... ,...r.,i....... ::.....„4.-;ii::."....1....
•1••#-..-.•••04:-,..). ,._0" 1,-,,..-.. 44?:,#.y,44. ,•-' .,.i.. . '' •'.
„, • •••1 All.,,l'ai..t,•,,v0i. •11.4, .4.iff 44: , , ,
*1141' • (04 'kli.11:•,41119,"Ail -
)
i
61 1 -'.. 4-''J i dr'r,-,ce _AAP'• J.-'":14,rt ,..,....:' . . • ' ' '
ir-.4 .....,.•
- 240....44' t #.4 1 :44471 . _:.• _... ,,.. w, ...*Li, ..;.:,!i.1 r i' ,. • ; .4.. 1:ilialS. ,. i JA.,."..- .1, • -.. '' ' r;.';-
• 7 , 11'# 1`74-ifj. -Pk'
, ...-1-,,,,i; r.:*: ...r.r4 -, i • ,4 .. • r.
0
p
,.. _ • i, 1,:. 4,;,....ie.Rate.pf- ...f.,,,•:-.,, ......ji:f•' • . ., , - .. '
. ' - ; : ti-j: P.41-4) hiii, . ' r, . _ 0, , : . •
k• -
i. C . A..,.,r„. J . •
sm •.,.-,!. 1. ....,., ,. Ill.,' ,, ):1 •)1 . la„4-412;.‘,4- ' • :-1-16i3r .!'';'.tik- .11`y.k i:.C.f'irri .' ?•"% * L'1.1`-14,:e.-.* '. ' .,...
f f . •.1.e;. . •? ..41*. d' 4u1 *
it
, . k:',..., 4--i• - 4, .,, , .
..e...'e fd.....11";...•.'-•- . 'Ir.- • . . .......-41 ...1••• t i. A,••'. P :4'6 , a0.4:wiP' P_!•44‘4,4"? ". ?..'1!"; 'A.43'.'r; .. , ' ''. ''
.. „„r .4 - or.. .... _ -,. . A 41:;14:17• ;!,r•Ita,1.2. •
r
,,,...1 ".EA.': . ..3,,,:i:;%• •.., , ,. . ,, •
11,:•' . .. .11..... ••,. 1 II; ..••• •••• . . .;041p.•11 44
o.•
... „4" ••
.,frt ,„41 1,.* 4 .. Mjz.,.. !.... -s• •hi?..;-,7 ,'• .,4 -....- , •:.
A 1-11., .- .-4”- - • 'rgi • • 't "" • ,. -•,,-„..tr, -AT - :i sr..7 , ... dr7,. I o .........3 ,iltit....I Ili.',',Al . .. 3 ii.4.' , '.. • .i .
". '. .jg.... ..••A.,it # il• •,, -,..., •,,,,, • . . , •4.• ; 4 • ,isyi ,_f. • .4. , . ., .
. 'hi:. ,-4.r • IA - ••••'- 4 e m ill.w.-.A . '... 1- 'at:t• , i„-.• • .
#NQUIRY#:5996243.5
i N - ,,..., %.•, _..r. .............. ....„.„. .,,,, ,.., ,,.,../...„„ii„,,,,,,.,-..0,.,,,,,,, .. -,•
,.."...,..,• ..,: ,,...., :.... ...), ...,...,... Ad ' ?,-1.,Itv,1);fre:.f,r,I4 .'-,;,..4,sy;;• z• ; . r. .•
• I.-.0 .11 iii :r., ; .- ...-- vii, ••.;,-.01Prrit. sr&w• ' ,, " •".1e'r''. -, ■i '1'0'4
4. • ' ill Ai •-4-''''', t," • lel 4 -41i 4.• e„.r.:1..'. .2i..#.111.1111:r F ••,'••+1 0 •
YEAR: 2006
•
EDR
"4 ,t . .'1,;:!.., ii' ." -,'i Ir .....r - .'fill', ......L.- .1,•i,i1P..4.,....1 r_d,...:." ' .';.....41:ip . . ' . .
Ik'14, ''' •da e'.. fel;".tr.- i p.,.,.....ft; Ilk/rerf Le I i•:•.,.r.) Ill I ilt".i.i.•%.4• - ' ,asr , ,..,..-`-'''.04 IL--i'.•'..,61, • -.4 ,•r ir: • ,',,,f' .' 'A 1.0•. .$ gli"...'..-4 - •
i -500' '4 , . ....3,.-r-1;5: .4. . ; ;.. .,,,• , -„,.• .... 3.•./44,.,.... .• -, !..fr,•,.. : • .0%,, „.• , 0
.• •

.,I .M.Ifir ' .1,,,, .
_ 4. ..
ot .
,.•L ,
- _ .....
.."
, .i.,.
.. . . ....... ., 1, .1,14, 4 toe . iiiiii. ...
•
... •,. • • ... ._ AI • . ... - - Ir
' ' * - L-
I - NH
ti
.. r : N.Ns.,:ir -.1,4., 4-7..... h
.P.::,;!, .•#iiii;. . .kb.:41r........:N4 . .- • . — J.,_._ _ •I•211 A
4..0 jrc . ....
-..P AI."' . Nei/ . :.-- "- .*::
\Iiiiiiiiii.,‘Lii..
Al ri.
:.ipor7,.:10....,4,:.,.miiii.-- ••..-!.-or'N...„:.: IP 41114.)-n4.-; 1)11: .
• :
it: J -!
0,•-•\_.pe. ''. _.1. .-
k.
in•. � �
Jrr ti' - -t
_ i c
f
}
0.
ram ' N. , `y.� _ `*.f `
P r . N-• filit.). . — ._ .L.
4).tit. ..-. 'in'r
. L.-,`• .4. , ' ,1. '..,'..--. F..-. 1 sq -.-24,47jr.l
- • 5
k -. 1..T. .....f. . 4r li. IL,- ).
4F'
r.pr
r '
0:: ' •.-41„1 ' , 1 . , :i...' , •
•
4•w•' '3 -+k - t1- .1
t. ,t
jo,
INQLI4RY#:5996243.5 ti• . < _ . ..,:r .It-,6
N _. _ t .-- -
YEAR: 1998Lilt 'ti 1.0'',.t +' ► •� 5 4 .' .
=750' FOR ., - }. ` "- ,

•
, .
• ..,
f ii: . , ,. • ,
i'
• , . .
-t it%• . , ; '•'• ,, 'i . .'';'''.' , -'•i ., . c':14.":4_ft Pi
i
Me"'— • .. "- - . ' ,f,4"I. '.
....i.
.,_.. '•1'" . ,r.* '4-,1
'• • - ' '+, t'
"•-f #3.
'3'7-. , 14,.. ,,,..4-11L440.5. , •,0410
-4.... -
;• .-•''ri•* ,' 1
. .
.„_
...... .... . ,
i~p ,. .. .
. .
-s,...
. • , t
''I VIP 4t i• . .
• . ,
41011004101114., l', •Ilk* N 1 4.,-,••••• , i -7. "0 'a'
. • ...,-;.....''' .'•1...,..1.1 '1,.: ',/ ,. f' ', , .' .1.. 1 •
' , . : • t. ... :.• %, ..
,'.••, P. •, . . .
,.....1. if .. ..14..-ki • ,4,5•':.,,,) , .,- 1. . ,
14,4.
4k -.: •4`-:v .-,.. '.'3,,..‘,... •i, ., - - •
..., iv
‘ • ..' . :.' . ).•'i...t 4 4":1`.-..'e•-• • '. ..
s. ,••i ".; t.,, •
. '' ''. -1. 4 Y.' •
. ,.1 i, ,.... . •
. . '1,.0,:.• ' • I:I'
. ,
'.'.{: 441Liiii- Arr ..•
1 1.... .•. '
# ^.
, ' .• 4.
..4.. .
. •
• 14.
44.
..... #
4," 4 •
....40X4
. ,
' ...
)1i e
a'
"IP'
tt
1 f Csi ,
.4' .
Ot
..... , ,
4. .
. .
. .
- .
INQL14RY#:5996243.5 . . / ••
- j,•
- ..r . •
YEAR: 1994 i N ' .
-5.. -itli. , ; .7 'A •' ,• .
,. .
' • ,
—500' EDR , P.:21011, .... ,, ,11., . ,,‘• _ r.... ,
• , , .
' • .. '' '

•
" `�" I. f ti.
All 1
�•
•
�r —re
•
•
• + r
. -
f, 4 . f. . ' .. '� _ ;'I. .►i
•, + t
•
•
!� f �' y S
• Akira,. i
it P • 1/4•,• rj +�•
�• j . .a
- r ;.
11.111 %•
+` �w ; - ate ` "-•. a J ,i
+ ' s*.� F i'. 'may'l "`r
�+ •e4. .:Ad i■
. I
r - r.F h
i+- * '• • .' •r� fir. e
.+0. f ; + -T Tir
. , -._ . ••• lir .46 • .41 . • ' • L. .1--%.,fy. . 1
. .4 , ih>1111. e ; e -* - ,
i4 -':.. .x„,
CI'. k 1 ! 4 . N._(4441liej e400A,411 •%"OR _ •.-
4 . 4...ii,P,..P.ii, ... ...
i • I. . , . Gi .
4,11.1/(41/1' dottiv
_ ... 4:14,441„,,ir .
NtiNro:•4, a,' Ile..44f t .._ .
- eY i144 i�
r 4.
I ' 1 - r r r
p 11111101411110 e tir. :.
1
•
t L I)lifit'r r• AP1.OP•• • • . . 1_•
•
•
#NQEJGRY#:5996243.5 i N 1
YEAR: 1984 _4.
{ �• ¢ . s z

'- - i. I . •• r 'A • 'T . ' .r•• ,�`�' } * 1ir� .
L
'e Alt I . . k.4 . j lip . — . .
i . y_ . :
L 441 N • : r ,' G y }- - - Y r - 4..•#1 4 T
1 14 •
`+
• 4 . ..*Y 1 •
• +
` .r y 4 + y . + + 4
•
•
�11iJ� F, III
'� •411 •f
4.10 + • ■ 1
1 ' Rr
•
} A ■ i Y YIt1 1 1
/ .
• J� a i +w 4',#:fi • w
■
ii
•
4 i1
% Air• .
. - +ale. r 6• r s A
' , • L
Y . f 1 n.241P f 4, r
• illi1 ' • y • 1rM ,+ •
•
. ' lI• .� +, ' I � 1 +
, •• I - r 1 • * --
+•y i • • iliel op 1 r 4+ ; 7
hat t
! ' i
4k'I 1 1 1:1 . LI All irohir V%,it..ii: 9. ,,
_ + 4 1
*
' 4
1111191
. 047 ii
r I •
I'1 . . ' 1 4-. Y-1
L f,1
4
f — i C+ 4.
IF
I
. -- Li. I
�1F I - i _
le
- F ' *P _
iir F
. Ilk ' -
•
} .+ ' { 1. • } ,
i+ , g ` +`1
INQUIRY#:5996243.5 i
r
N r .
..*
iYEAR: 1975 V.-
I =500' EDR

\..1._ , uir,,, , ,
. . ,,... - 7 _
. .._
... 4, -"r • . • % r, .
•
�� gyp. • S • . r.
•
fT .. r ar`. • - ti •�-
•
. ►• �• am:. y f .�f,7 - •ti '. .r : ►R�
- -' II?'" le t. r %,* 4 -.4. .r •'''lai'r N-,'
la ..37.1-,,, -is: ,- .n • .• . . -. _T
. , ,..e.‘1,..:,: - a ,. it' kiiiik: 1 *' • . , .
10
•
Alesti,‘ .
lk. .• .•-•,,..„. -.Artir. it ••r•-- low
v 3, .,.,- .--%
` '1 •. _• / NA ,g - ' k . ) fir• , ;4
,4.-0_ . 1: A .
. __
... ....
.,-- ,,,...., . . ., ,
• .., .r. • .• .
1. • ' gi‘411::.'. IS 4.4 lf-.-. . 4. i . •-•'744-'.
1 1 / •
/ _ N r ,•
• .„,&at'lige*le,
I,' dr. rY Agi010110, ,
-4;2 ip•',ie"
'.. it). , , ,
-. i,1f o r
•
04,'.41j:
,-
a....,
.' . ' • ••4 '
N. ; i' ` _ . yr' _ it , t
• • • 1` rAN l''+.-ter .:
INQUIRY#:5996243.5 .■ ; {� +': •` ' •_ 1 a 4 ' ` N ti ;} .r ."r. .
YEAR: N _, . .. 1 w V • . y ? v ,b. , •.#
1954
=500' EDR • . r' - .+#Y►� * r�}w , r ! _ �' w •

r I I-
t5- h
CI ll �r n
`•� �� O ».i n n�n va ea.f-- ✓a .i O.o n a o ��o a m n _ _
c , A �] -
•
CA) p o
n -v c
y
r3 a .O i N.N n `£1 N N n N n f"T'- ��
C L n p
.,
i t* . �_
he g L'
Y mm ii Hann ■ .
V oa �yJ I , cio r{ c nn oo�o d$ f �� 7y
C a.
y .+ ':ig. 4 ti tic r
▪ s- r r f` i t <
Y .
c o EE n ii;
0000000 0 0' 00 .e11000 v.00 e z :
o ■ c if a q -
i p o S n
5
x _ K. ! a
c ■
.o 3 a a
��
fi• C if t = cO :
Qo v
r ma o.E
i f S ■ ` ` . Ei iEc E-
p = 1 O Od U RC -E : -
C C
a E� p t53 a ■ EU ma oIa
-S n r ?
aC
r •_:. tR ciao° w ■ ,o 2 c ` ip� _t- w
E
5
G• � � �■ I �c9uu� a ` ao� o � � a oic s 8i
maOs $ v $ 4 $ 'i w_ '
Z Ig gtatnci3gSmicEw- 2e2 �rtH2s1
s : 31a 0844auag=o2ZI . 29x0Sm2a3ZEncg § :
L
m
O t. e-o32 Q0.-ri.i Ni omeZmoV m (..i e.ciig.�$gn' Z 8
0.^
s a r
.i+ '+ 0:.�6 ci.n n aan.0 V. n c o r n anwn
e o ■
3
7 to 9nn n ntrnnn N NG . r .-NNrrrrn
a �v J
O• a S
1
1 m -
n= .0
iil
: o L
., Sr eo mm ryn� mnmlo ■
d d n c -o o p d
r) oy ..ca 1
O O LL
iS c B ■po ■ -
C 2 0 -
- m p a b-L1 r
cs c 1 E a o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0,0 o n 0,0 o1 u a
— E El -
s 0. V .Ogu df
L
fi e
�n m 116
H c
7 v1 'n w --
r,.]1 9 $a
■ c �- 9` Sr,
- / k : =`9! it. s
a Lf1 w m + aI -'
_ • ' " aaE $ wr EI',
i. , U I f o E c S a g 0 3 w o a E a a it J
' 7Jc,aE `a 'F,gc e g w S 1; e !
'n \ ►R Ow E ao- n; g .S.ppo,3 q w .1=`i art cY . E n
.+7� r F e .c:`�{'u a`o a w 735o. a m E 3 . a y i oo S o,2a s g:i
p �- tf- 1 p1.-,311aoeyeingp $ a • -8 :; WE.2 +s :ey
U . p.q Ec a:t- u `8 3co o` g — Eli 0-02 -El c--
8 : ;m O� $+$ og = L°zSEx n S13o miT¢2$LLseia of c b `g
■ a �!H aE-a¢o¢ aides N a6s.6ma` -X. 5 1
o el Hwx Q�.vei 6.amn �ui m �ea ncvnNne.�' 2 06
i

_f -
Y
a eI tirilli w hQ'�/y5I r wa.Y
il, milimili , . m
' II • -
0
II
iii
v(� �av �v .,—opo '62�l k1... �Jll-- a -
Viiiiiiiiii ,
E.
1= \...0 c ted
Ii
1 L
'Q �' Doc ag z r' 2 . E ' i_
E2_i 9 a ; S_ - T. w o z
3 _ � ■ ;�' ffia 1e; ;moo m 2F ' i7
$E° v o • g i a`a t i e a G n o m e n Ea a C w E
0 •„ �i Z - 2 LL WOMmI�C6E.., _G _
i OE, cj t C � lC 0 "'o . _s _ SO m
C w r Si, Q�i,i ri vi �. r: of� � `' �[) �a+,a n n.M m n' Z m
n n n'io -
a
ii "
i: i::oii
--n n U
as T
1, U h
c
. r o L
ce a1.
_ .,..
I .\
I . , 2.= II ilz r
' '
4
0
•
a a `
I jir I .: )_ a m c E a
VS 1 -n O c c ` = i c ■ c
C/� _ .L+ ; - o0 w a c a.16 w r
c= 015
v o %O do 9 w q = tLI1=1 C iiii
— gwa1n " "Iz � dtx m1=a p 94= a v:= ;-S $�� L7['iYO O LL¢m ZEi.54a 3 ES m
0 w Foi, .4 �e - ■mw m ra-'�+.nftnnipn'2 W

1- " _1
a. 2 aM ']0.0 . FR 0 0 o o 0 0� 4 ;L�
x o
.S _ a r n r r r a = t
3 o iv w IN el n .cinw.+nrnu�r 4r'■('('' �-1-9.
am
J ,J a�'
nt0
o
c! Ii
Li' p - :-O O ��Q.�NC NI 001/1:111 g
n n��0 0 0 10I L� y
+Tj r 11 o S
1 II
s a s In
E
S.-
-el � ti
wa 20000000;000 00 00 0000 0000
C OC fa •, 1-7 `
I11 6 3_
?• 6 0 N W - - - -i I
O y Y - - V
= C E Li• - _ .
E R S 5 7
a o. m g` = r
z ~, s -
o 2 n 3 C
$ rsiG 3 n 2. s
-- • w I L ■ • -
• T 1, flin g E. IA p oza - 8 ° °▪ ..ia 9 AS +
45 N 6 p 3 q . 9
_
"aZg
•
3 �1.. .. c 4`aos5 ofg g� aw ®.5i-2 a- moDr� nE .2 c It.
. 1 • C
Ull) `e O�o o _�Ena;i=6z, EceeIIa H ;IS$.a8wr yr.LI l C�
Z r -Em m ,5 §5n iR :v i $Var a Eq= On`:gw rt of:` u
i 1 1- . �P'm=zn:ao`�=dao3i= a; -_,_018_muoe ga!u_0 a3,'ed.S Y
0 d I-Fa, Q:-ci... v-.o 4 r�mo o,�. 0 6.-r°w n n. oI N' Z 00
I - - �E
r� S 1,. _ t F
a] r..-, c [/_ L - -
L� r 0 roi 011 rl sf o!nin V1 bI;: ae ri0 n`R O0 0rf.4.4+4.1 S r
ry} c ` z i i 4` ��L. .,,,..`�y i
`g f r' J
- C s -r" w 1 P.,nnn- , IKdr - �tfn�vr .` -
- a S' ' • - JfI -
J 7V4V�'
m
� . ��.� .. .-�. n nnnnT lr -a 000o 6 O. i}G M � . f..
C ` 3= n . LL -
,--_▪. I& Y I 0 c
CE IN NN o o o o :l 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a o -0 n 0 0 0 0 0 0
a e w e q
o 2 n !
O - r•
r., _
00l 7 g
R S b.
C16 C-'
a■ - o
U'F L i'" � ac=6 I aS S r 11 t�s p-. S r.-
$
C
E s 7.. -{J .to r n r Eem b `o-5 ■ - r
wwE_ a laa iS
_
g : g - o •
a et
L.w 15=iFt - A 2' -0r3o g tl o23wef.: •m185af W .
� w II
U"tii 8• '�$ � � = r�-® � $4ca � a= E $ o� a c . 4-7
Z . 4sa O-' Za3 : itia- , sa pQa}er0noa�
t
a1 =gw 08,4z os=vz•2 =a Qf.m02mE 3Xa. • 3zm Ye
■1 Fosg 4 e+ vi 4 Ij:d ri o aiO - rri<d CI'
0 G v Cr;rn n'Ndg a
e7

.7.'•tt.
....'.1.- 7....
t t"
1!- '
I
C, . ...
fl. .la
0 413 413 V)va Ca el en, 11111 00...1.1.R.1 . ..C>
"".1▪ .....
tli
1,1
f ........ —.....
o Vil
._•
o S
1111 ,•L
_
0) ii g- 7- .
: -tp 18:
1- i ' S
......1 a•..1-ra- 4,1••1w ....
. . 0
0.-
, n 60 143 0 10 10 60 a
1111111
• . o
....,
'''. ii i; E• III I
.3:0. .c. oc.croopc. VI el 0 0 0 0 0.0
1• a c a a eir' X
a o. o rat •
› .•.,
ir. 1
...._
. —
O 8 1
I 1 !
're ..E .•
0 3-- a. i P-
,.. -1 ----, ; .
= a ‘la 1 3 t 7
1 '
. 2 6 er *
1 -
--li .---
Ara -13,. ]fi
E --C.- E 1'--
EI ,..E....c_ -e cP-2I.a 2 la 3131 '.5 .4.5 " is'," 1 2 ;.-
*. I-, •".E Z 4 ...,,
a 9 aEt02i2.8* •-7.."3: fjP12/1 . ,...„_,
i 4.--, 20-f,E.1,I.;i 11' ... a o La o 1-3 . s V
A2 :3 . • 1.7's' = E . S I L..
E -
fL-Ep.:11:4.7.,.T.g 1.7.Ac': s 51 'fai-vgt r ICI',
0 ---- c e o4'.. ,..w — Eit.lt ..,F,i .IF 8 7,5213,1 >•.-. '4'5 , ..2 'AV:
i ii2. 72,` Eitii:Allifigli:131 tiT.ig?Illr11211 :. E
i 1 .ii?- a i3 arta 8II,5,1 r t Tic IlzoSii2&3ZZOIX fl i
8 it g w Z ..t.•..-,..i...E. .4,.6,6...:4 oi...=-':.-.....•ai T-4 .1!,c-""4.5"P.;,t'g g 7;g P;A z if)
,,..▪ .! •
P
r
. "•
; .Lo
NJ kiN -,i 2 el Al el r,ft el el en,,., e., 4.,o r,r; ommen7'!'l.e C• +.
.--‘. -Z. :‘,. ...•
co .
,_ c...
--- ,
_ . . .i.,
u l ,-...7_ :_:-.. . . , • k. -..- -1- ,---t 3 3 ...61 -
..-
.., . . ... , ...
r 5 .
a s k d •ea ea .'om av es ea ea ea,p-.p-• VA el -.--..- ..-.-el op.p-•-•L.-;-e .
,..... "
*.
•3 8 t i - —
, _.
. _ .._\...
0 r.- .....
77, E
.... :-.. __
E Z. ..a r A a •.:-- -'7.• .
..- c,8 c.) . -,•
0 ..c i.
.E • I 1
z 2 ,
....
-47 1 2
.-
g .
. .. , E 2.0.0 0 o 6 o c:.o a,o 0 0 t22.0 0 .410.14.-W000 ....:_.'
2 a t a a ac
. o. G., a Lal • : 1...
> '
E . i
1 e
1 I -r. 1
1 =— a-
ci
ci
ji.0 .3 • i 1
s_
7._-_, .-,-,(A ig-•,, a B.? :",... E 1 v
5 1 0
: • --c, -- 92-2 1 iE g E
,ES 1171 .3 'gbit; F, ig.•
a T.e....L. :5 a a:tiit fill #tii .
a -•-• s•I'g 1
,,477g.t. ,,,EB-z* tf8" =
Eliigot121•1!,;(-
Z 2E ,.sgas0-; 2ia ; =Ili VIZIga 1 f. a gi o,re''-
g; i.-J g E.- - .i:-... 6Y' g: 1 0

• / • r
MIIIIN
.) %.:___ -
o 13� -
�
. / « / /! ) ,] ® ., �r�,_,(r�• ! 1111111 : \ :
f \ +
/ \
Lii!
_ '2 /
© y! .L !
\ I) - . . k
_ S- � |� � ,§¥� ( err +
; a ;| r-o%_.00 ; -
c,.,
} .. j .. . i, _
6 i -
,
o
Li) ® - % I i .
� !
_ � ` iE :/ � \
[ & - § : /_ . f - ;!
,�a : . -! s= ! !!p
i! • - ,e
/ 2 \all : 1 . \f : .2 ! ' :m . $! 2 ■!-
0- L.
f2$ : 2 2; $ Salt. kkkkkƒit. j «\
-` \- b � 2* la ' : §, 5.l � 4■;fk - k$%
V ) § a)k 2= • 1,1 .1 1f22ff�� §I{ 2 `
z e. | : ! - Paa � � k!°
§ !}m csRa : !I! Z . ■. _.s ` - @,
l . lfz )!■oa_�� fz�l�« ; :
. : «1 _ ; id ,soci# 'ad «^-3''"®aK,k&Pihak#. z !

c.
\ • \ \
§ • k {
/ /
k 2 * 5
72
§ � j \
B j --
o
de j� 111,4
{ § 2 ( t )
en
in
01
_ /,.! )• �tg \
§§ § — f. !
�}� \ \ . \a \ \ \ } \ \
{{ a • 7 cL
d } GB If ®E■ `- P 7 ;3 -
| _ • Z /1- § t r
OE id § | f% - E :k _ { ; @ f
y ! {
= - -
ll o ) j\ )D) } ]) } 7
)
(\ \ \)t = }
; ! . I f [a(
E • \ \ E\2 ! -E / ■a ) /k £ / r
` j �) } z -
� \ J (, e § E5 e / ) _§ \ � -
§ 'ET
§ \ )
/ j ) _ :§a { E E .2} ! ' [§!g !, to . ) \ _ ];§ $ - f§ ) �] ;� # )‹§ ) y ° ! @)/ -\-{ \ [ [ ) { /; k I !

! «
4.
re
j4 ° o
��\
. ) 2 § /
\ § \ �
7 • a ‘a. » {
} { i §
.Z. ) §
{_ }
72 k q ) /
t ,
0 To
- #
/ t ci £
[\ 6{ C, r hi %
\ � � A.
tn 7{
II
"7,.5.
/ \ {
10
01
\ *
/ / fl
00 !
\\/ \ \
§{ kk NI ) 1r []
Hi / } 2
: ! II © _/�0lI ,%
6 . __� 7 - �:
} ) { \
) ) \ \ , 04. 2
0
0 } i« { ; # »
mGm
{ } ) }\ !

ci
•
| / 6
k (
IN
raa
44.1
co
Li— \
W \
\ ■ \\ \
m § 2 [ z ]
o
en
o
In
Li
.a.
! qa
}( \ ) \&r
; -§_[§! = a
= _ cu
�I2 § F.
w
® , } .
2 §q� — CC t ® 2
5gn aV, - - §
.�6%| ® ' T/ _ . r k
§ § |Qtr, ff \ — -, ea ; ! :
k _ _ $- | ƒ a
re., ] f{ ; 2
2 )$ § « 2
k � ` `
§ E § )\ �\ } } ( ®
0 ! : {` { _ E
! -� ° ! 0u 7
\{ \ � � � \ §
I- - . de /
) ! {f iQ i- 0 §
§2 ¥a g | 4 e2 §
§B - ]A i2 \ \
§ } 20 [ \)§ k ni! -
2 re
:§ \ c / }\ §f!§ We _$
z § «\;\ a\ \� a \ co
en §§ /
■; 4k I u }

E ‘
I
j Uk ,
} k
COII - `
o ck Nai
a To
k! { m®a.o
g! , � ?/ \ � v±\ \
e } 49
Z' � +\ k ' - 'fw\ mm.�\ \ a\al
en
al
\}
\§ } ° e
} f,k { \ _
II
UI }
in
0 \ i k « t
\/ / \ \ `
\c
I• II
� ?s
o /) } / \¢ co-
: 0 7
� 2 ® » + �»
in
to
iu o
f$ ) ° - ;4#, 7
i m..
0 2 \ / ) §