Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20140334 Ver 1_Mitigation Site Visit_20210709From: Davis. Erin B To: Baker, Caroline D Subject: FW: [External] RE: Candy Creek DMS Site Visit Date: Monday, November 1, 2021 12:45:40 PM Laserfiche Upload: Email DWR#: 20140334 v.1 Doc Type: Mitigation Site Visit From: Haywood, Casey M CIV (USA) [mailto:Casey.M.Haywood@usace.army.mil] Sent: Friday, July 9, 2021 8:46 AM To: Davis, Erin B <erin.davis@ncdenr.gov>; Kim Browning <Kimberly.D.Brown ing@usace.army.miI>; Tugwell, Todd J CIV USARMY CESAW (US) <Todd.J.Tugwell@usace.army.mil> Cc: Munzer, Olivia <olivia.munzer@ncwildlife.org> Subject: [External] RE: Candy Creek DIMS Site Visit CAUTION: External email. Do not click links or open attachments unless you verify. Send all suspicious email as an attachment to Report Spam. Thanks Erin, I will save these in our files. Casey From: Davis, Erin B <erin.davis(@ncdenr.gov> Sent: Wednesday, July 7, 2021 2:19 PM To: Haywood, Casey M CIV (USA) <Casey.M.Haywood Pusace.army.mil>; Browning, Kimberly D CIV USARMY CESAW (USA) <Kimberly.D.Browningl@usace.army.mil>; Tugwell, Todd J CIV USARMY CESAW (USA) <Todd.J.Tugwelll@usace.army.mil> Cc: Munzer, Olivia <olivia.munzer(@ncwildlife.org> Subject: [Non-DoD Source] Candy Creek DMS Site Visit TKC, The site visit for Candy Creek went well. I'm ok with the proposed credit release. Let me know if you have any questions. Field Notes: • Looked at the three mowing encroachment areas proposed for replanting this fall • CC Reach 1— no concerns (other than encroachment) • CC Reach 2 — previous meander scour repair looked stable, good live stake cover • CC Reach 3 — 20ft meander scour proposed for brush toe repair this fall; a previous scour bend "healed" itself • UT1D — series of structure failures - 5 log sills to be repaired this fall • UT2 Reach 1— old pond bottom area looks good - stable single thread channel within wet floodplain • UT2 Reach 2 — near reach end/confluence channel narrows with veg (flat floodplain area) - watch that channel is maintaining; isolated low cover area in buffer (construction cut area; bedrock exposed) woody growth ok streamside and along CE boundary — plan to reseed/replant this fall • UT5 — excess sediment is present but does not appear to be significantly impacting stream function — riffles and structures visible, pools shallow, banks stable • Overall, the woody and herbaceous veg looks great. Good flow in all reaches walked. Discussed importance of keeping up with invasive treatments and landowner resolutions to encroachments from now until closeout. The proposed planting and repairs will be noted in the next monitoring report. Erin B. Davis, PWS Stream & Wetland Mitigation Coordinator 401 & Buffer Permitting Branch Division of Water Resources Department of Environmental Quality 919-817-0360 cell erin.davis&ncdenr.gov