Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20210046 Ver 1_photos of Hartzog Ford Bridge support removal_20211029 Wanucha, Dave From:Hining, Kevin J Sent:Friday, October 29, 2021 12:46 PM To:Wanucha, Dave Subject:photos of Hartzog Ford Bridge support removal Attachments:Before photo - Just before bridge supports were removed.jpg; Photo 1 - Setting up turbidity curtain for first support removal.jpg; Photo 2 - Curtain in place just before removal of first support.jpg; Photo 3 - turbidity going under curtain during removal.jpg; Photo 4 - first support removal.jpg; Photo 5 - first support removal.jpg; Photo 6 - third support removal.jpg; Photo 7 - third support removal.jpg; Photo 8 - trackhoe moving from third to second support.jpg; Photo 9 - second support removal.jpg; Photo 10 - 300 meters downstream, 1.5 hours after removal started.jpg; Photo 11 - 0.5 miles downstream, 1.5 hours after removal started.jpg; Photo 12 - 1 mile downstream 1.5 hours after removal started.jpg Hey Dave, Sorry for the delay getting these photos to you – the week has flown buy…. Hopefully the photo titles explain everything. We setup and tried a turbidity curtain at first, but it wasn’t really capturing the sediment. Not to say it wouldn’t work in other places, but honestly, we really didn’t have a way of securing it for the middle support and water was probably to swift on the third support as well. We had a tough time as it was, setting it up for the first support given the current, so we pulled it out after the first support was removed. In short, we went in with a trackhoe equipped with a hammer and collapsed all three piers. After the piers were hammered into smaller pieces, we reached what debris we could from both banks with a trackhoe. We then took a trackhoe into the water to retrieve the final large pieces. I plan to go by early next week to see how the removal of the smaller pieces went – they sent a couple folks out in waders with a john boat (no machinery/equipment in the water this time) and filled it full of smaller pieces earlier this week. Our construction supervisor visited yesterday before the rain started and indicated that most of the remaining pieces had been retrieved. Following the recent rain, I’m hoping you won’t even be able to tell the bridge supports were ever there. The entire removal took < 2 hrs. I visited several spots downstream during the removal, but long enough after it started to capture the turbidity levels (meaning the sediment would have had time to travel that far). You could tell something was going on 300 m below the work areas, as there was some turbidity, but very minor. There were little to no signs of turbidity further downstream. As you noticed, the pier drilling probably caused more turbidity than the bridge support removal. I’m confident a causeway installation and removal would have resulted in more turbidity than we observed, at this location. Big thanks for letting us give this a try. I know it won’t work in all cases, but this seemed liked the perfect place to do it. I really think it was way more environmentally friendly than the causeways would have been. I will see if I can email some videos next. If not, I can share them somehow…. Thanks and have a good weekend! Kevin 1 Kevin Hining Division 11 Environmental Supervisor North Carolina Department of Transportation 828-386-7202 cell kjhining@ncdot.gov 801 Statesville Rd. PO Box 250 North Wilkesboro, NC 28659 Email correspondence to and from this address is subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties. _____________________________________________________________ Email correspondence to and from this sender is subject to the N.C. Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties. 2