20211268 Ver 1_Email_20211012

FGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZAAABACADAEAFAGAHAIAJAKALAMANAOAPAQARASATAUAVAWAXAYAZBABBBCBDBE
1
NC WAM WETLAND ASSESSMENT FORM
2
Accompanies User Manual Version 4.1
3
Rating Calculator Version 4.1
4
Wetland Site NameDate
Alexander Farms09/19/2018
5
Wetland TypeAssessor Name/Organization
Mary K Murray/Terracon
6
Level III EcoregionNearest Named Water Body
McDowell Creek
7
River BasinUSGS 8-Digit Catalogue Unit
03050101
8
YesNoPrecipitation within 48 hrs?Latitude/Longitude (deci-degrees)
35.463067, -80.886457
9
10
Evidence of stressors affecting the assessment area (may not be within the assessment area)
11
Please circle and/or make note on last page if evidence of stressors is apparent. Consider departure from reference, if
12
appropriate, in recent past (for instance, approximately within 10 years). Noteworthy stressors include, but are not limited
13
to the following.
14
•Hydrological modifications (examples: ditches, dams, beaver dams, dikes, berms, ponds, etc.)
15
•Surface and sub-surface discharges into the wetland (examples: discharges containing obvious pollutants, presence of nearby
16
septic tanks, underground storage tanks (USTs), hog lagoons, etc.)
17
•Signs of vegetation stress (examples: vegetation mortality, insect damage, disease, storm damage, salt intrusion, etc.)
18
•Habitat/plant community alteration (examples: mowing, clear-cutting, exotics, etc.)
19
20
Is the assessment area intensively managed?
YesNo
21
22
Regulatory Considerations (select all that apply to the assessment area)
23
Anadromous fish
24
Federally protected species or State endangered or threatened species
25
NCDWQ riparian buffer rule in effect
26
Abuts a Primary Nursery Area (PNA)
27
Publicly owned property
28
N.C. Division of Coastal Management Area of Environmental Concern (AEC) (including buffer)
29
Abuts a stream with a NCDWQ classification of SA or supplemental classifications of HQW, ORW, or Trout
30
Designated NCNHP reference community
31
Abuts a 303(d)-listed stream or a tributary to a 303(d)-listed stream
32
33
What type of natural stream is associated with the wetland, if any? (check all that apply)
34
Blackwater
35
Brownwater
36
Tidal (if tidal, check one of the following boxes)Lunar LunarWindBoth
37
38
Is the assessment area on a coastal island?
YesNo
39
40
Is the assessment area's surface water storage capacity or duration substantially altered by beaver?
Yes
41
42
Does the assessment area experience overbank flooding during normal rainfall conditions?
YesNo
43
44
1.Ground Surface Condition/Vegetation Condition – assessment area condition metric
45
Check a box in each column.
Consider alteration to the ground surface (GS) in the assessment area and vegetation structure
46
(VS) in the assessment area. Compare to reference wetland if applicable (see User Manual). If a reference is not applicable,
47
then rate the assessment area based on evidence of an effect.
48
GSVS
49
AANot severely altered
50
BBSeverely altered over a majority of the assessment area (ground surface alteration examples: vehicle tracks, excessive
51
sedimentation, fire-plow lanes, skidder tracks, bedding, fill, soil compaction, obvious pollutants) (vegetation structure
52
alteration examples: mechanical disturbance, herbicides, salt intrusion \[where appropriate\], exotic species, grazing,
53
less diversity \[if appropriate\], hydrologic alteration)
54
55
2.Surface and Sub-Surface Storage Capacity and Duration – assessment area condition metric
56
Check a box in each column.
Consider surface storage capacity and duration (Surf) and sub-surface storage capacity and
57
duration (Sub). Consider both increase and decrease in hydrology. Refer to the current NRCS lateral effect of ditching guidance for
58
North Carolina hydric soils (see USACE Wilmington District website) for the zone of influence of ditches in hydric soils. A ditch
59
≤ 1 foot deep is considered to affect surface water only, while a ditch > 1 foot deep is expected to affect both surface and ditch
60
sub-surface water. Consider tidal flooding regime, if applicable.
61
SurfSub
62
AAWater storage capacity and duration are not altered.
63
BBWater storage capacity or duration are altered, but not substantially (typically, not sufficient to change vegetation).
64
CCWater storage capacity or duration are substantially altered (typically, alteration sufficient to result in vegetation
65
change) (examples: draining, flooding, soil compaction, filling, excessive sedimentation, underground utility lines).
66
67
3.Water Storage/Surface Relief – assessment area/wetland type condition metric (answer for non-marsh wetlands only)
68
Check a box in each column for each group below
. Select the appropriate storage for the assessment area (AA) and the wetland

FGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZAAABACADAEAFAGAHAIAJAKALAMANAOAPAQARASATAUAVAWAXAYAZBABBBCBDBE
69
type (WT).
70
AAWT
71
3a.AAMajority of wetland with depressions able to pond water > 1 foot deep
72
BBMajority of wetland with depressions able to pond water 6 inches to 1 foot deep
73
CCMajority of wetland with depressions able to pond water 3 to 6 inches deep
74
DDDepressions able to pond water < 3 inches deep
75
76
3b.AEvidence that maximum depth of inundation is greater than 2 feet
77
BEvidence that maximum depth of inundation is between 1 and 2 feet
78
CEvidence that maximum depth of inundation is less than 1 foot
79

FGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZAAABACADAEAFAGAHAIAJAKALAMANAOAPAQARASATAUAVAWAXAYAZBABBBCBDBE
80
4.Soil Texture/Structure – assessment area condition metric
81
Check a box from each of the three soil property groups below.
Dig soil profile in the dominant assessment area landscape
82
feature. Make soil observations within the 12 inches. Use most recent National Technical Committee for Hydric Soils guidance for
83
regional indicators.
84
4a.ASandy soil
85
BLoamy or clayey soils exhibiting redoximorphic features (concentrations, depletions, or rhizospheres)
86
CLoamy or clayey soils not exhibiting redoximorphic features
87
DLoamy or clayey gleyed soil
88
EHistosol or histic epipedon
89
90
4b.ASoil ribbon < 1 inch
91
BSoil ribbon ≥ 1 inch
92
93
4c.ANo peat or muck presence
94
BA peat or muck presence
95
96
5.Discharge into Wetland – opportunity metric
97
Check a box in each column.
Consider surface pollutants or discharges (Surf) and sub-surface pollutants or discharges (Sub).
98
Examples of sub-surface discharges include presence of nearby septic tank, underground storage tank (UST), etc.
99
SurfSub
100
AALittle or no evidence of pollutants or discharges entering the assessment area
101
BBNoticeable evidence of pollutants or discharges entering the wetland and stressing, but not overwhelming the
102
treatment capacity of the assessment area
103
CCNoticeable evidence of pollutants or discharges (pathogen, particulate, or soluble) entering the assessment area and
104
potentially overwhelming the treatment capacity of the wetland (water discoloration, dead vegetation, excessive
105
sedimentation, odor)
106
107
6.Land Use – opportunity metric
108
Check all that apply (at least one box in each column).
Evaluation involves a GIS effort with field adjustment. Consider sources
109
draining to assessment area within entire upstream watershed (WS), within 5 miles and within the watershed draining to the
110
assessment area (5M), and within 2 miles and within the watershed draining to the assessment area (2M). Effective riparian buffers
111
are considered to be 50 feet wide in the Coastal Plain and Piedmont ecoregions and 30 feet wide in the Blue Ridge Mountains ecoregion.
112
WS5M2M
113
AAA≥ 10% impervious surfaces
114
BBB< 10% impervious surfaces
115
CCCConfined animal operations (or other local, concentrated source of pollutants)
116
DDD≥ 20% coverage of pasture
117
EEE≥ 20% coverage of agricultural land (regularly plowed land)
118
FFF≥ 20% coverage of maintained grass/herb
119
GGG≥ 20% coverage of clear-cut land
120
HHHLittle or no opportunity to improve water quality. Lack of opportunity may result from hydrologic alterations
121
that prevent drainage or overbank flow from affecting the assessment area.
122
123
7.Wetland Acting as Vegetated Buffer – assessment area/wetland complex condition metric
124
7a.Is assessment area within 50 feet of a tributary or other open water?
125
YesNoIf Yes, continue to 7b. If No, skip to Metric 8.
126
Wetland buffer need only be present on one side of the water body. Make buffer judgment based on the average width of the wetland.
127
Record a note if a portion of the buffer has been removed or disturbed.
128
7b.How much of the first 50 feet from the bank is weltand? Descriptor E should be selected if ditches effectively bypass the buffer.
129
A≥ 50 feet
130
BFrom 30 to < 50 feet
131
CFrom 15 to < 30 feet
132
DFrom 5 to < 15 feet
133
< 5 feet or buffer bypassed by ditches
E
134
7c.Tributary width. If the tributary is anastomosed, combine widths of channels/braids for a total width.
135
≤ 15-feet wide> 15-feet wideOther open water (no tributary present)
136
7d.Do roots of assessment area vegetation extend into the bank of the tributary/open water?
137
YesNo
138
7e.Is tributary or other open water sheltered or exposed?
139
Sheltered – adjacent open water with width < 2500 feet and no regular boat traffic.
140
Exposed – adjacent open water with width ≥ 2500 feet or regular boat traffic.
141
142
8.Wetland Width at the Assessment Area – wetland type/wetland complex metric (evaluate for riparian wetlands only)
143
Check a box in each column.
Select the average width for the wetland type at the assessment area (WT)
144
and the wetland complex at the assessment areas (WC). See User Manual for WT and WC boundaries.
145
WTWC
146
AA≥ 100 feet
147
BBFrom 80 to < 100 feet
148
CCFrom 50 to < 80 feet

FGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZAAABACADAEAFAGAHAIAJAKALAMANAOAPAQARASATAUAVAWAXAYAZBABBBCBDBE
149
DDFrom 40 to < 50 feet
150
EEFrom 30 to < 40 feet
151
FFFrom 15 to < 30 feet
152
GGFrom 5 to < 15 feet
153
HH< 5 feet
154

FGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZAAABACADAEAFAGAHAIAJAKALAMANAOAPAQARASATAUAVAWAXAYAZBABBBCBDBE
155
9.Inundation Duration – assessment area condition metric
156
Answer for assessment area dominant landform.
157
AEvidence of short-duration inundation (< 7 consecutive days)
158
BEvidence of saturation, without evidence of inundation
159
CEvidence of long-duration inundation or very long-duration inundation (7 to 30 consecutive days or more)
160
161
10.Indicators of Deposition – assessment area condition metric
162
Consider recent deposition only (no plant growth since deposition).
163
ASediment deposition is not excessive, but at approximately natural levels.
164
BSediment deposition is excessive, but not overwhelming the wetland.
165
CSediment deposition is excessive and is overwhelming the wetland.
166
167
11.Wetland Size – wetland type/wetland complex condition metric
168
Check a box in each column.
Involves a GIS effort with field adjustment. This metric evaluates three aspects of the wetland area: the
169
size of the wetland type (WT), the size of the wetland complex (WC), and the size of the forested wetland (FW) (if applicable, see User
170
Manual). See the User Manual for boundaries of these evaluation areas. If assessment area is clear-cut, select “K” for the FW column.
171
WTWCFW (if applicable)
172
AAA≥ 500 acres
173
BBBFrom 100 to < 500 acres
174
CCCFrom 50 to < 100 acres
175
DDDFrom 25 to < 50 acres
176
EEEFrom 10 to < 25 acres
177
FFFFrom 5 to < 10 acres
178
GGGFrom 1 to < 5 acres
179
HHHFrom 0.5 to < 1 acre
180
IIIFrom 0.1 to < 0.5 acre
181
JJJFrom 0.01 to < 0.1 acre
182
< 0.01 acre or assessment area is clear-cut
KKK
183
184
12.Wetland Intactness – wetland type condition metric (evaluate for Pocosins only)
185
APocosin is the full extent (≥ 90%) of its natural landscape size.
186
BPocosin is < 90% of the full extent of its natural landscape size.
187
188
13.Connectivity to Other Natural Areas – landscape condition metric
189
Check appropriate box(es) (a box may be checked in each column). Involves a GIS effort with field adjustment.
This
13a.
190
evaluates whether the wetland is well connected (Well) and/or loosely connected (Loosely) to the landscape patch, the contiguous
191
metric naturally vegetated area and open water (if appropriate). Boundaries are formed by four-lane roads, regularly maintained utility
192
line corridors the width of a four-lane road or wider, urban landscapes, fields (pasture open and agriculture), or water > 300 feet wide.
193
WellLoosely
194
AA≥ 500 acres
195
BBFrom 100 to < 500 acres
196
CCFrom 50 to < 100 acres
197
DDFrom 10 to < 50 acres
198
EE< 10 acres
199
FFWetland type has a poor or no connection to other natural habitats
200
201
Evaluate for marshes only
.
13b.
202
YesNoWetland type has a surface hydrology connection to open waters/stream or tidal wetlands.
203
204
14.Edge Effect – wetland type condition metric (skip for all marshes)
205
May involve a GIS effort with field adjustment. Estimate distance from wetland type boundary to artificial edges. Artificial edges include
206
non-forested areas ≥ 40 feet wide such as fields, development, roads, regularly maintained utility line corridors and clear-cuts.
207
Consider the eight main points of the compass.
208
ANo artificial edge within 150 feet in all directions
209
BNo artificial edge within 150 feet in four (4) to seven (7) directions
210
An artificial edge occurs within 150 feet in more than four (4) directions or assessment area is clear-cut
C
211
212
15. Vegetative Composition – assessment area condition metric (skip for all marshes and Pine Flat)
213
AVegetation is close to reference condition in species present and their proportions. Lower strata composed of appropriate
214
species, with exotic plants absent or sparse within the assessment area.
215
BVegetation is different from reference condition in species diversity or proportions, but still largely composed of native species
216
characteristic of the wetland type. This may include communities of weedy native species that develop after clearcutting or
217
clearing. It also includes communities with exotics present, but not dominant, over a large portion of the expected strata.
218
CVegetation severely altered from reference in composition. Expected species are unnaturally absent (planted stands of non-
219
characteristic species or at least one stratum inappropriately composed of a single species). Exotic species are dominant in
220
at least one stratum.
221
222
16.Vegetative Diversity – assessment area condition metric (evaluate for Non-tidal Freshwater Marsh only)
223
AVegetation diversity is high and is composed primarily of native species (<10% cover of exotics).
224
BVegetation diversity is low or has > 10% to 50% cover of exotics.

FGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZAAABACADAEAFAGAHAIAJAKALAMANAOAPAQARASATAUAVAWAXAYAZBABBBCBDBE
225
CVegetation is dominated by exotic species (>50% cover of exotics).

FGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZAAABACADAEAFAGAHAIAJAKALAMANAOAPAQARASATAUAVAWAXAYAZBABBBCBDBE
226
227
17.Vegetative Structure – assessment area/wetland type condition metric
228
17a.Is vegetation present?
229
YesNoIf Yes, continue to 17b. If No, skip to Metric 18.
230
231
for all marshes only
Evaluate percent coverage of assessment area vegetation . Skip to 17c for non-marsh wetlands.
17b.
232
A≥ 25% coverage of vegetation
233
B< 25% coverage of vegetation
234
235
Check a box in each column for each stratum for non-marsh wetlands
.Evaluate this portion of the metric. Consider structure
17c.
236
in airspace above the assessment area (AA) and the wetland type (WT) separately.
237
AAWT
238
AACanopy closed, or nearly closed, with natural gaps associated with natural processes
239
BBCanopy present, but opened more than natural gaps
240
CCCanopy sparse or absent
241
Canopy
242
AADense mid-story/sapling layer
243
BBModerate density mid-story/sapling layer
244
CCMid-story/sapling layer sparse or absent
245
Mid-Story
246
AADense shrub layer
247
BBModerate density shrub layer
248
CCShrub layer sparse or absent
249
Shrub
250
AADense herb layer
251
BBModerate density herb layer
252
CCHerb layer sparse or absent
Herb
253
254
18.Snags – wetland type condition metric
255
ALarge snags (more than one) are visible (> 12-inches DBH, or large relative to species present and landscape stability).
256
BNot A
257
258
19.Diameter Class Distribution – wetland type condition metric
259
AMajority of canopy trees have stems > 6 inches in diameter at breast height (DBH); many large trees (> 12 inches DBH) are
260
present.
261
BMajority of canopy trees have stems between 6 and 12 inches DBH, few are > 12-inch DBH.
262
CMajority of canopy trees are < 6 inches DBH or no trees.
263
264
20.Large Woody Debris – wetland type condition metric
265
Include both natural debris and man-placed natural debris.
266
ALarge logs (more than one) are visible (> 12 inches in diameter, or large relative to species present and landscape stability).
267
BNot A
268
269
21.Vegetation/Open Water Dispersion – wetland type/open water condition metric (evaluate for Non-Tidal Freshwater
270
Marsh only)
271
Select the figure that best describes the amount of interspersion between vegetation and open water in the growing season. Patterned
272
areas indicate vegetated areas, while solid white areas indicate open water.
273
ABCD
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
22.Hydrologic Connectivity – assessment area condition metric (evaluate for riparian wetlands only)
282
Examples of activities that may severely alter hydrologic connectivity include intensive
283
ditching, fill, sedimentation, channelization, diversion, man-made berms, beaver dams, and stream incision.
284
Overbank and overland flow are not severely altered in the assessment area.
A
285
BOverbank flow is severely altered in the assessment area.
286
COverland flow is severely altered in the assessment area.
287
Both overbank and overland flow are severely altered in the assessment area.
D
288
289
Notes
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297

BFBGBHBIBJBKBLBMBN
1
NC WAM WETLAND ASSESSMENT FORM
2
Accompanies User Manual Version 4.1
3
Rating Calculator Version 4.1
4
09/19/2018
5
Mary K Murray/Terracon
6
McDowell Creek
7
03050101
8
35.463067, -80.886457
9
10
11
12
13
14
Hydrological modifications (examples: ditches, dams, beaver dams, dikes, berms, ponds, etc.)
15
Surface and sub-surface discharges into the wetland (examples: discharges containing obvious pollutants, presence of nearby
16
septic tanks, underground storage tanks (USTs), hog lagoons, etc.)
17
Signs of vegetation stress (examples: vegetation mortality, insect damage, disease, storm damage, salt intrusion, etc.)
18
Habitat/plant community alteration (examples: mowing, clear-cutting, exotics, etc.)
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
No
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
Severely altered over a majority of the assessment area (ground surface alteration examples: vehicle tracks, excessive
51
sedimentation, fire-plow lanes, skidder tracks, bedding, fill, soil compaction, obvious pollutants) (vegetation structure
52
alteration examples: mechanical disturbance, herbicides, salt intrusion \[where appropriate\], exotic species, grazing,
53
54
55
56
57
duration (Sub). Consider both increase and decrease in hydrology. Refer to the current NRCS lateral effect of ditching guidance for
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
Check a box in each column for each group below
. Select the appropriate storage for the assessment area (AA) and the wetland

BFBGBHBIBJBKBLBMBN
80
81
82
feature. Make soil observations within the 12 inches. Use most recent National Technical Committee for Hydric Soils guidance for
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
Noticeable evidence of pollutants or discharges (pathogen, particulate, or soluble) entering the assessment area and
104
105
106
107
108
Check all that apply (at least one box in each column).
Evaluation involves a GIS effort with field adjustment. Consider sources
109
110
assessment area (5M), and within 2 miles and within the watershed draining to the assessment area (2M). Effective riparian buffers
111
are considered to be 50 feet wide in the Coastal Plain and Piedmont ecoregions and 30 feet wide in the Blue Ridge Mountains ecoregion.
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
Little or no opportunity to improve water quality. Lack of opportunity may result from hydrologic alterations
121
122
123
124
125
126
Wetland buffer need only be present on one side of the water body. Make buffer judgment based on the average width of the wetland.
127
128
How much of the first 50 feet from the bank is weltand? Descriptor E should be selected if ditches effectively bypass the buffer.
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148

BFBGBHBIBJBKBLBMBN
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
Check a box in each column.
Involves a GIS effort with field adjustment. This metric evaluates three aspects of the wetland area: the
169
size of the wetland type (WT), the size of the wetland complex (WC), and the size of the forested wetland (FW) (if applicable, see User
170
Manual). See the User Manual for boundaries of these evaluation areas. If assessment area is clear-cut, select “K” for the FW column.
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
Check appropriate box(es) (a box may be checked in each column). Involves a GIS effort with field adjustment.
This
190
evaluates whether the wetland is well connected (Well) and/or loosely connected (Loosely) to the landscape patch, the contiguous
191
metric naturally vegetated area and open water (if appropriate). Boundaries are formed by four-lane roads, regularly maintained utility
192
line corridors the width of a four-lane road or wider, urban landscapes, fields (pasture open and agriculture), or water > 300 feet wide.
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
May involve a GIS effort with field adjustment. Estimate distance from wetland type boundary to artificial edges. Artificial edges include
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
Vegetation is different from reference condition in species diversity or proportions, but still largely composed of native species
216
characteristic of the wetland type. This may include communities of weedy native species that develop after clearcutting or
217
218
Vegetation severely altered from reference in composition. Expected species are unnaturally absent (planted stands of non-
219
characteristic species or at least one stratum inappropriately composed of a single species). Exotic species are dominant in
220
221
222
223
224

BFBGBHBIBJBKBLBMBN
225

BFBGBHBIBJBKBLBMBN
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
Check a box in each column for each stratum for non-marsh wetlands
.Evaluate this portion of the metric. Consider structure
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
Majority of canopy trees have stems > 6 inches in diameter at breast height (DBH); many large trees (> 12 inches DBH) are
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
Large logs (more than one) are visible (> 12 inches in diameter, or large relative to species present and landscape stability).
267
268
269
270
271
Select the figure that best describes the amount of interspersion between vegetation and open water in the growing season. Patterned
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297

NC WAM Wetland Rating Sheet
Accompanies User Manual Version 4.1
Rating Calculator Version 4.1
Wetland Site NameAlexander FarmsDate09/19/2018
Wetland TypeHeadwater ForestAssessor Name/Organization Mary K Murray/Terracon
Notes on Field Assessment Form (Y/N)NO
Presence of regulatory considerations (Y/N)NO
Wetland is intensively managed (Y/N)YES
Assessment area is located within 50 feet of a natural tributary or other open water (Y/N)YES
Assessment area is substantially altered by beaver (Y/N)NO
Assessment area experiences overbank flooding during normal rainfall conditions (Y/N)NO
Assessment area is on a coastal island (Y/N)NO
Sub-function Rating Summary
FunctionSub-functionMetricsRating
LOW
HydrologySurface Storage and RetentionCondition
LOW
Sub-Surface Storage and RetentionCondition
HIGH
Water QualityPathogen ChangeCondition
HIGH
Condition/Opportunity
YES
Opportunity Presence? (Y/N)
MEDIUM
Particulate ChangeCondition
Condition/OpportunityNA
Opportunity Presence? (Y/N)NA
MEDIUM
Soluble ChangeCondition
HIGH
Condition/Opportunity
YES
Opportunity Presence? (Y/N)
HIGH
Physical ChangeCondition
HIGH
Condition/Opportunity
YES
Opportunity Presence? (Y/N)
Pollution ChangeConditionNA
Condition/OpportunityNA
Opportunity Presence? (Y/N)NA
MEDIUM
HabitatPhysical StructureCondition
LOW
Landscape Patch StructureCondition
LOW
Vegetation CompositionCondition
Function Rating Summary
FunctionMetrics/NotesRating
LOW
HydrologyCondition
HIGH
Water QualityCondition
HIGH
Condition/Opportunity
YES
Opportunity Presence? (Y/N)
LOW
HabitatConditon
Overall Wetland RatingLOW